alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1485.22 Reports. ( a ) Participants are required to submit regular financial and performance reports in accordance with their agreement. Reporting requirements and formats for the required financial and performance reports will be specified in the agreement between CCC and the Participant.
( b ) ( 1 ) In addition to the information required in 2 CFR 200.329(c)(2), a Participant's performance reports must include pertinent information regarding the Participant's progress, measured against established indicators, baselines, and targets, towards achieving the expected results specified in the agreement. This reporting must include, for each performance indicator, a comparison of actual accomplishments with the baseline and the targets established for the period. When actual accomplishments deviate significantly from targeted goals, the Participant must provide an explanation in the report.
( 2 ) A Participant must ensure the accuracy and reliability of the performance data submitted to FAS in performance reports. At any time during the period of performance of the agreement, FAS may review the Participant's performance data to determine whether it is accurate and reliable. The Participant must comply with all requests made by FAS or an entity designated by FAS in relation to such reviews.
( c ) All final performance reports will be made available to the public.
( d ) Not later than 45 calendar days after the completion of travel (other than local travel), a MAP Participant shall submit a trip report. The report must be submitted to the appropriate Attaché/Counselor(s) and must include the name(s) of the traveler(s), purpose of travel, itinerary, names and affiliations of contacts, and a brief summary of findings, conclusions, recommendations, and specific accomplishments.
( e ) Not later than 90 calendar days after the end of its program year, a MAP Participant shall submit a report on any research conducted pursuant to the approved MAP program.
( f ) If requested by FAS, a Participant must provide to FAS additional information or reports relating to the agreement.
( g ) If a Participant requires an extension of a reporting deadline, it must ensure that FAS receives an extension request at least five business days prior to the reporting deadline. FAS may decline to consider a request for an extension that it receives after this time period. FAS will consider requests for reporting deadline extensions on a case by case basis and will make a decision based on the merits of each request. FAS will consider factors such as unforeseen or extenuating circumstances and past performance history when evaluating requests for extensions.
[85 FR 1732, Jan. 13, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 68884, Dec. 6, 2021]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1942

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1942.11 [Reserved]
§ 1744.210 Effect of this subpart on RUS loan contract and mortgage. ( a ) Except as expressly provided in this subpart, the borrower shall comply with all provisions of its loan contract with RUS, its notes issued to RUS, and the RUS mortgage, including all provisions thereof relating to investments not covered by this subpart.
( b ) Nothing in this subpart shall affect any rights of supplemental lenders under the RUS mortgage, or other creditors of the borrower, to limit a borrower's investments, loans and guarantees to levels below those permitted in § 1744.202.
( c ) As used in paragraph (b) of this section, supplemental lender means a creditor of the borrower, other than RUS, whose loan to the borrower is secured by the RUS mortgage.
#### § 1784.31 Exception authority.

The Administrator may, in individual cases, make an exception to any requirement or provision of this part which is not inconsistent with the authorizing statute or other applicable law and is determined to be in the Government's best interest.
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2006-0104.

#### C.R. Green, L.P. v. Mayfield Hts.

Cuyahoga App. No. 85853, 2005-Ohio-6359. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would also accept on all other Propositions of Law.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
CLEAN AIR ACT ADVISORY COMMITTEE February 2 and 3, 2010
Double Tree Hotel
AGENDA

February 2, 2010 - Clean Air Act Advisory Committee Subcommittee Meetings

9:30 – 11:30 Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovation

12:30 – 5:00 Permits, New Source Reviews and Toxics

February 3, 2010 – Clean Air Act Advisory Committee Meeting

8:00 - 8:30 Registration

8:30 – 9:20 Opening Remarks – Gina McCart hy, Assistant Administrator, Office of
Air and Radiation

9:20 – 9:50 Update on EPA Budget – Beth Cr aig, Deputy Assistant Administrator,
Office of Air and Radiation

9:50 – 10:30 Subcommittee Report outs Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovations – Rob Brenner Permits, New Source Reviews and Toxics – Bill Harnett
10:30 – 10:45 Break

10:45 – 11:45 Background Presentations GHG/BACT workgroup
Brian Doster – EPA OGC
Don Neal – CALPINE

11:45 – 1:00 Lunch

1:00 – 3:30 BACT/GHG Report Review and Deliberation Eric Svenson, PSEG MarkMacleod, EDF Peter Tsirigotis, EPA

3:30 – 3:45 Public Comments

3:45 – 4:15 Clean Air Excellence Awards/Next meeting

4:15 Adjourn
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                       MAUNA LOA MACADAMIA PARTNERS, L.P.
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER CLASS A UNIT
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER UNIT DATA)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  1995       1994       1993
                                 ------     ------     ------  
<S>                               <C>        <C>        <C>
Net income                       $1,192        486      1,512
                                 
Class A Unitholders'             
 percentage of ownership          x 99%      x 99%      x 99%
                                 ------     ------     ------
Net income allocable             
 to Class A Unitholders          $1,180        481      1,497
                                 ======     ======     ======
                                 
                                 
                                 
Class A Units outstanding         7,500      7,500      7,500
                                 ======     ======     ======
                                 
                                 
                                 
Net income per Class A Unit       $0.16       0.06       0.20
                                 ======     ======     ======
</TABLE>                         
                                 






                                       69
§ 1751.101 General. ( a ) It is the policy of RUS that every State have a Modernization Plan which provides for the improvement of the State's telecommunications network.
( b ) A proposed Modernization Plan must be submitted to RUS for approval. RUS will approve the proposed Modernization Plan if it conforms to the provisions of this subpart. Once obtained, RUS's approval of a Modernization Plan cannot be rescinded.
( c ) The Modernization Plan shall not interfere with RUS's authority to issue such other telecommunications standards, specifications, requirements, and procurement rules as may be promulgated from time to time by RUS including, without limitation, those set forth in 7 CFR part 1755.
( d ) The Modernization Plan must, at a minimum, apply to RUS Borrowers' wireline service areas. If a Modernization Plan is developed by the PUC, RUS encourages, but does not require, that the Modernization Plan's requirements apply to the rural service areas of all providers of telecommunications services in the State. A PUC's decision not to include non-RUS Borrowers will not prejudice RUS approval of that PUC's Modernization Plan. The PUC may also, at its option, extend coverage of the Modernization Plan to all service areas of all providers of telecommunications services in the State. In addition, while the requirements and goals contained in § 1751.106 apply only to wireline services, the PUC, at its discretion, may extend coverage of Modernization Plans to wireless or other communications services in the State as it deems appropriate. Borrower-developed Modernization Plans apply only to Borrowers.
#### § 1786.34 Access to records of lenders, servicers, and trustees.

The lender, the servicer, or the trustee will permit representatives of RUS (or other agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture authorized by that Department) to inspect and make copies of any of their records pertaining to RUS guaranteed loans. Such inspection and copying may be made during regular office hours of the respective party or any other time the party and RUS find convenient.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN
ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000792984
<NAME> RADVA CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          23,625
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,862,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                   172,560
<INVENTORY>                                    908,968
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,786,632
<PP&E>                                       5,564,578
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,067,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,773,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,915,891
<BONDS>                                      2,678,127
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,047
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,511,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,773,778
<SALES>                                      9,432,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,720,108
<CGS>                                        7,302,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,404,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             322,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    393
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                393
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       393
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.9(b)
 (KRATON LOGO)STRICTLY
CONFIDENTIAL
 TO:
    
    David BradleyFROM:
    
    Richard OttDATE:
    
    January 1, 2008
    A. Bonus A. Vesting Date A
 B. Bonus B. Vesting Date B
   provided,
 www.kraton.com




---



##### 



provided
  Kraton Polymers LLC
    
    Acknowledged and Agreed to:By:
    /s/ Richard Ott
    
By:
    /s/ David BradleyRichard Ott
    
    
    David BradleyDate: 01/10/08
 www.kraton.com
EX-10.19



 Exhibit 10.19 
 First Amendment to the Exclusive IP License Agreement for RQ-00000005 

between Aratana Therapeutics Inc. and RaQualia Pharma Inc. 
 This is the First Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Exclusive IP License Agreement for RQ-00000005 dated December 27, 2010 (the “Agreement”) between Aratana
Therapeutics Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Licensee”) and RaQualia Pharma Inc., a Japanese corporation (“Licensor”), and is made and entered into between Licensee and Licensor on July 12, 2012 (the
“Amendment Effective Date”). Licensee and Licensor are referred to herein individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. 

RECITALS 

WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into the Agreement, pursuant to which Licensor granted Licensee an exclusive worldwide license to RQ-00000005
Technology (as defined in the Agreement); 
 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the provision regarding development and supply of the
API; and 
 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as set forth below: 

AMENDMENT 
  

	A.	Amendment. The Parties agree to delete Section 7 of the Agreement in its entirety. The Parties further agree that neither Party has claims and/or
liabilities arising out of or in relation to the performance of or failure to perform the rights and obligations stipulated under Section 7 of the Agreement prior to Amendment Effective Date. 


 

	B.	Other Terms: All other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. To the extent that any provision of the Agreement conflicts with any
provision of this Amendment, this Amendment will take priority. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to the Agreement to be executed by their
authorized representatives. 
  

									
	Aratana Therapeutics Inc.	 		 	RaQualia Pharma Inc.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ David K. Rosen
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Atsushi Nagahisa

					
	Name:	 	 David K. Rosen
	 		 	Name:	 	 Atsushi Nagahisa

					
	Title:	 	 President & COO
	 		 	Title:	 	 President & CEO

					
	Date:	 	 12 July 12
	 		 	Date:	 	 July 23, 2012
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,014-01

EX PARTE KENNETH BROUSSARD, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1451074-A IN THE 178 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of delivery of less

than one gram of cocaine, and was sentenced to eight months in state jail. He did not appeal his

conviction. 

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and that his conviction violates due process

because the evidence in his case was tested and found not to contain any cocaine, even though the

lab test shows that the evidence contained methamphetamine, a different controlled substance.
2

The parties have entered agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the trial court

determined that Applicant’s decision to plead guilty in this case was not a voluntary and intelligent

choice. 

In Mable, this Court held that a guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance was

involuntary when the Applicant did not know that the seized substances contained no illicit

materials. Ex parte Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). We order that this application

be filed and set for submission to determine whetherApplicant’s plea of guiltywas involuntarywhen

the substances seized and tested contained illicit materials other than those alleged, but which are

within the same penalty group under the Health and Safety Code. The parties shall brief the issue. 

It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If he is not, the trial court shall determine

whether he is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and desires to be represented by counsel, the trial

court shall appoint an attorney to represent them. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art 26.04. The trial court

shall send to this Court, within 30 days of the date of this order, a supplemental transcript containing:

a confirmation that Applicant is represented by counsel; the order appointing counsel; or a statement

that Applicant is not indigent. All briefs shall be filed with this Court within 60 days of the date of

this order. 

Delivered: March 9, 2016

Do not publish
**Exhibit 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Directed Electronics, Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Minarik, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                 /s/ James E. Minarik   James E. Minarik  Date: May 8, 2008 Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 1924

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1924 appear at 80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1924.267-1924.270 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69953-69956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 10-57]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a copy of a letter to the 
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-57 with 
attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of 
Technology.

    Dated: November 9, 2010.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[[Page 69954]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.052


[[Page 69955]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.053

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.054


[[Page 69956]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.055

[FR Doc. 2010-28771 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.655 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70048]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, 
November 18, 2010 at 3 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session, and determined that 
no earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
November 18, 2010 will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Consideration of amicus participation; and other matters relating 
to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

     November 10, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-28924 Filed 11-12-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Jack Brusk, defendant in error, v. Irving Royack et al., plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 33,663.

Opinion filed December 31, 1929.

Gallagher, Shulman & Abrams, for plaintiffs in error. Haffenberg, Kopald & Burns, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 31 , 202 3

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 2 2

- 00 5 42

- CV

AAF AUTO GROUP, INC. D/B/A AMERICA’S AUT O FINANCIAL , Appellant

V.

DORIAN HALE , Appelle e

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1171099

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is from a final judgment signed April 25
, 20 22

. On July 26, 2022, the court reporter indicated that there was no reporter’s record. The clerk’s record
was filed October 10 , 20 22 . No brief was filed.

On October 17 , 20 22 , this court issued an order stating that unless appellant
filed a brief on or before December 19 , 2022, the appeal was subject to dismissal
without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P

. 4.1(a), 42.3(b).2

Appellant filed no brief or ot her response. We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Wilson.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsScience and applications on the space station: A strategic visionThe central themes relating to science and applications on the Space Station for fiscal year 1989 are discussed. Materials science research is proposed in a wide variety of subfields including protein crystal growth, metallurgy, and properties of fluids. Also proposed are the U.S. Polar Platform, an Extended Duration Crew Operations Project, and a long-range Space Biology Research Project to investigate plant and animal physiology, gravitational biology, life support systems, and exobiology. The exterior of the Space Station will provide attachment points for payloads to study subjects such as the earth and its environment, the sun, other bodies in the solar system, and cosmic objects. Examples of such attached payloads are given. They include a plasma interaction monitoring system, observation of solar features and properties, studies of particle radiation from the sun, cosmic dust collection and analysis, surveys of various cosmic and solar rays, measurements of rainfall and wind and the study of global changes on earth.Document ID19900004177Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1988Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:101863NASA-TM-101863Accession Number90N13493Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004177.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024