alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer ofAffinity Group Holding, Inc., certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofAffinity Group Holding, Inc.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures, (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:

 

(a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: November 14,  2008 | /s/ Michael A. Schneider               |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                          | Michael A. Schneider                   |
|                          | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.225 Liquidation of security.

When the District Director believes that continued servicing will not accomplish the objectives of the loan, he or she will complete Exhibit A of this subpart (available in any Rural Development office), and submit it with the District Office file to the State Office. If the State Director determines the account should be liquidated, he or she will encourage the borrower to dispose of the Rural Development security voluntarily through a sale or transfer and assumption, and establish a specified period, not to exceed 180 days, to accomplish the action. If a transfer or voluntary sale is not carried out, the loan will be liquidated according to subpart A of part 1955 of this chapter.
EXHIBIT
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Datawatch Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Murray P. Fish, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










/s/ Murray P. Fish
              Murray
      P. Fish
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              December
      21,
      2009
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1464.20 Proposal procedures. ( a ) NRCS will: ( 1 ) Periodically announce opportunities through a simplified competitive process for eligible partners to submit proposals for partnership agreements; and
( 2 ) Make public the criteria that will be used to evaluate proposals for partnership agreements in each announced project selection opportunity, which may include whether NRCS will consider alternative funding arrangements or grant agreements during the selection opportunity or whether proposals seeking alternative funding arrangements or grant agreements will have a separate selection opportunity. These criteria will relate to four principle categories: Impact, partner cash and in-kind contribution, innovation, and project management.
( b ) A partnership agreement proposal submitted by the eligible partner must include the following: ( 1 ) The scope of the proposed project, including one or more conservation benefits that the project must achieve;
( 2 ) A plan for monitoring, evaluating, and reporting on progress made toward achieving the project's conservation objectives;
( 3 ) The estimated RCPP funding and other program resources requested for the project including any advance technical assistance for outreach in the project area;
( 4 ) Whether the eligible partner is requesting NRCS to consider the proposal for funding under an alternative funding arrangement or grant agreement under § 1464.25;
( 5 ) Each eligible partner collaborating to achieve project objectives, including their roles, responsibilities, capabilities, and contribution; and
( 6 ) Other information NRCS may identify as necessary to evaluate and select proposals.
[85 FR 8137, Feb. 13, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 3744, Jan. 15, 2021]
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: __2011________-NM-___275______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### § 1709.203 Definitions.

As used in this subpart, the following definitions apply:

*Eligible area* means any area that is primarily dependent on delivery of fuel by water or air for a significant part of the year and where fuel cannot be shipped routinely by means of surface transportation either because of absolute physical constraints or because surface transportation is not practical or is prohibitively expensive.

*Fuel means* oil, diesel fuel, gasoline and other petroleum products, coal, and any other material that can be burned to make energy.

*State entity* means a department, agency, or instrumentality of any State.

*Surface transportation* means transportation by road, rail or pipeline.
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United      States Code)**

***Company***

***Form 10-Q/A***

| Dated: | January                12, 2007 |                                                         |   | /s/                Howard S. Balter |   |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                            |                                                         |   | Howard                S. Balter     |   |
|   |                            | Chief                Executive Officer                       |   |
|   |                            | (Principal                Executive Officer )                |   |
|   |                            |                                                         |   |
| Dated: | January                12, 2007 |                                                         |   | /s/                Ilan M. Slasky   |   |
|   |                            |                                                         |   | Ilan                M. Slasky       |   |
|   |                            | President                                                    |   |
|   |                            | (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer ) |   |
| D      |                            |                                                         |   |
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted July 25, 2008∗

Decided July 29, 2008

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

No. 07-3255

DANIEL FONTUS, 

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the 

United States,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an 

Order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals.

No. A73-033-399

Order

Four months after the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed an order 

requiring Daniel Fontus’s removal to his native Haiti, he filed a motion to reopen. The 

motion argued that Fontus would be persecuted should he return to Haiti, and that he 

therefore is entitled to asylum or withholding of removal. The Board denied this 

motion as untimely (the limit is three months). Although a motion may be submitted 

 ∗ After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is 

unnecessary. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with 

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 07-3255 Page 2

beyond three months if country conditions have deteriorated materially, the Board 

observed that Fontus does not argue that country conditions have changed since the 

time of the Board’s initial decision or his hearing before an immigration judge.

Fontus argues in this court that the Board abused its discretion by denying his 

motion to reopen. Claims of abuse of discretion in dealing with motions to reopen are 

outside this court’s jurisdiction. Kucana v. Mukasey, No. 07-1002 (7th Cir. July 7, 2008); Li 

Fang Huang v. Mukasey, No. 07-2961 (7th Cir. July 15, 2008).

Fontus also argues that the Board violated the due process clause by refusing to 

allow him to seek asylum. Constitutional contentions are within our jurisdiction. 8 

U.S.C. §1252(a)(2)(D). But an opportunity for a hearing was provided. Fontus could 

have applied for asylum years ago: he entered the United States in 1993 but did not 

raise the possibility of asylum until 2007, after the order of removal had become final. 

No case holds that the Constitution requires the agency to entertain belated claims by 

aliens who had, but did not use, ample opportunity to seek asylum and withholding of 

removal. Fontus’s constitutional argument is frivolous, nothing but the abuse-ofdiscretion argument with different verbiage.

The petition for review is denied to the extent it asserts that the Board violated 

the Constitution and otherwise is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1956

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1956.119-1956.123 [Reserved]
USING A 

GROUND STATION

 Mission Planner

3DROBOTICS.COM

1 Set up your ground station

After you’ve installed Mission Planner on your ground station laptop, follow 

these instructions to connect IRIS and view live data in flight. To download 

Mission Planner, visit 3drobotics.com/iris/info.

Connect the 3DR Radio to the micro-USB cable, and connect to your ground 

station laptop.

+

3DR Radio micro-usb cable

Orient antenna vertically.

When you’re ready to fly, power IRIS according to the preflight steps on the 

Flight Checklist, and open Mission Planner.

2 Connect IRIS to Mission Planner

In the top-right corner of Mission Planner, select the available COM port from 

the drop-down menu, set the rate to 57600, and select Connect.

3 View IRIS’ status in flight

Once IRIS is connected to Mission Planner, use the Flight Data screen to view 

location and status information.

Attitude

1 Heading direction

2 Bank angle

3 Altitude (black) and rate of climb (blue bar)

4 Ground speed

1

2

3

4

Status

4 Distance to current waypoint > current 

 waypoint number

5 GPS status

6 Battery status

1 Telemetry signal

2 GPS time

3 Currently enabled mode

1

2

3

4

5

6

Location

1 Current heading

2 Direct path to current waypoint (during missions)

3 GPS-reported direction of travel

4 Actual flight path

5 Latitude & longitude

6 Altitude

1

2

3

4

5

6
#### NEHILL, Respondent, v. CRONIN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by Mary J. Nehill against John H. Cronin.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### § 1726.12 Applicability.

The requirements of this part apply to the procurement of materials and equipment for use by electric borrowers in their electric systems and to the construction of their electric systems if such materials, equipment, and construction are financed, in whole or in part, with loans made or guaranteed by RUS, including reimbursable projects. In order for general fund expenditures for procurement or construction to be eligible for reimbursement from loan funds, the borrower must comply with the procedures required by this part. In the case of jointly owned projects, RUS will determine on a case by case basis the applicability of the requirements of this part.
§ 1744.203 Establishing amount of rural development investment. For purposes of determining whether a rural development investment is within the limits of the borrower's maximum investment ratio or the minimum total assets ratio, the amount of the qualified investment shall be the total amount of funds committed to the rural development project as of the date of determination. The total amount of funds committed to the rural development project includes: ( a ) The principal amount of loans and advances made by the borrower;
( b ) Guarantees made by the borrower; and
( c ) A reasonable estimate of the amount the borrower is committed to provide to the rural development project in future years.
### Hillside materials and slopes of the San Francisco Bay region, California

By: S. D. EllenC. M. Wentworth**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1357

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (22361 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (12868 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (14441 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (21236 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 4**                            (15094 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 5**                            (18262 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 6**                            (24273 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 7**                            (10570 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

This report describes the various bedrock and soil materials and slope gradients that constitute hillsides in the San Francisco Bay region. Distribution of materials and slopes is shown on 1:125,000-scale maps of the region. Approximately 360 materials units are described by bedrock composition, physical properties of bedrock (rock hardness, spacing of fractures and partings, and bed thickness), texture of the soil cover, expansivity, permeability, and stratigraphic thickness. Materials map units are based on compilations of geologic mapping of the region; descriptions are based on systematic field observations, free-swell tests for expansivity, examination of aerial photographs, and the literature.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.01
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------
                                   (Form 10-K)



     The undersigned, a Director of Ceridian Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby make, nominate and appoint JOHN R. EICKHOFF and
GARY M. NELSON, and each of them, to be my attorney-in-fact for three months
from the date hereof, with full power and authority to execute for and on behalf
of the undersigned the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; provided that such
Form 10-K is first reviewed by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Company and by my attorney-in-fact, and his name, when thus signed, shall
have the same force and effect as though I had manually signed such Form 10-K.

     I have signed this Power of Attorney as of February 28, 2003.



                                            /s/ William J. Cadogan
                                            ----------------------------
                                            William J. Cadogan

                                            /s/ Nicholas D. Chabraja
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Nicholas D. Chabraja

                                            /s/ Robert H. Ewald
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Robert H. Ewald

                                            /s/ Ronald T. LeMay
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Ronald T. LeMay

                                            /s/ George R. Lewis
                                            ----------------------------
                                            George R. Lewis

                                            /s/ Ronald L. Turner
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Ronald L. Turner

                                            /s/ Carole J. Uhrich
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Carole J. Uhrich
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

          - [AC-54: OTS No. H-4752]

                    Notice is hereby given that on November 10, 2010, the Office of Thrift Supervision approved the application of Alliance Mutual Holding Company and Greater Delaware Valley Savings Bank, dba Alliance Bank, Broomall, Pennsylvania, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail                     *Public.Info@OTS.Treas.gov*) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Northeast Regional Office, Harborside Financial Center Plaza Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City, New Jersey 07311.                

Dated: November 10, 2010.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-28952 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.213 Debt settlement.

Subpart C of part 1956 of this chapter prescribes policies and procedures for debt settlement actions for loans covered under this subpart when it is determined that a debt is eligible for settlement except as provided in §§ 1951.216 and 1951.231.