NASA Technical Memorandum 104566, Vol. 24

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series

Stanford B. Hooker and

Elaine R. Firestone, Editors

Volume 24, SeaWiFS Technical Report Series

Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

Elaine R. Firestone and Stanford B. Hooker

June 1995
NASA Technical Memorandum 104566, Vol. 24

SeaWiFS Technical Report Series

Stanford B. Hooker, Editor

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Greenbelt, Maryland

Elaine R. Firestone, Technical Editor

General Sciences Corporation

Laurel, Maryland

Volume 24, SeaWiFS Technical Report Series

Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

Elaine R. Firestone

General Sciences Corporation

Laurel, Maryland

Stanford B. Hooker

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Greenbelt, Maryland

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Goddard Space Flight Center

Greenbelt, Maryland 20771

1995
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

Abstract

The Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) is the follow-on ocean color instrument to the Coastal

Zone Color Scanner (CZCS), which ceased operations in 1986, after an eight-year mission. SeaWiFS is expected

to be launched in 1995, on the SeaStar satellite, being built by Orbital Sciences Corporation (OSC). The

SeaWiFS Project at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center

(GSFC), has undertaken the responsibility of documenting all aspects of this mission, which is critical to the

ocean color and marine science communities. This documentation, entitled the SeaWiFS Technical Report

Series, is in the form of NASA Technical Memorandum Number 104566. All reports published are volumes

within the series. This particular volume serves as a reference, or guidebook, to the previous 23 volumes and

consists of 6 sections including: an errata, an addendum (summaries of various SeaWiFS Working Group Biooptical Algorithm and Protocols Subgroups Workshops, and other auxiliary information), an index to key words

and phrases, a list of all references cited, and lists of acronyms and symbols used. It is the editors’ intention

to publish a cumulative index of this type after every five volumes in the series. Each index covers the topics

published in all previous editions, that is, each new index will include all of the information contained in the

preceeding indices.

1. INTRODUCTION

This is the fourth in a series of indices, published as

a separate volume in the Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view

(SeaWiFS) Technical Report Series, and covers information found in the first 23 volumes of the series. The Report Series is written under the National Aeronautics and

Space Administration’s (NASA) Technical Memorandum

(TM) Number 104566. The volume numbers, authors, and

titles are as follows:

Vol. 1: S.B. Hooker, W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman,

W.W. Gregg, and C.R. McClain, An Overview of SeaWiFS and Ocean Color.

Vol. 2: W.W. Gregg, Analysis of Orbit Selection for

SeaWiFS: Ascendingvs. DescendingNode.

Vol. 3: C.R. McClain, W.E. Esaias, W. Barnes, B.

Guenther, D. Endres, S.B. Hooker, B.G.

Mitchell, and R. Barnes, SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation Plan.

Vol. 4: C.R. McClain, E. Yeh, and G. Fu, An Analysis of GAC SamplingAlgorithms: A Case

Study.

Vol. 5: J.L. Mueller and R.W. Austin, Ocean Optics

Protocols for SeaWiFS Validation.

Vol. 6: E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker, SeaWiFS

Technical Report Series Cumulative Index:

Volumes 1–5.

Vol. 7: M. Darzi, Cloud Screeningfor Polar Orbiting

Visible and IR Satellite Sensors.

Vol. 8: S.B. Hooker, W.E. Esaias, and L.A. Rexrode, Proceedings of the First SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting.

Vol. 9: W.W. Gregg, F. Chen, A. Mezaache, J.

Chen, and J. Whiting, The Simulated SeaWiFS Data Set.

Vol. 10: R.H. Woodward, R.A. Barnes, W.E. Esaias,

W.L. Barnes, A.T. Mecherikunnel, Modeling

of the SeaWiFS Solar and Lunar Observations.

Vol. 11: F.S. Patt, C.M. Hoisington, W.W. Gregg, and

P.L. Coronado, Analysis of Selected Orbit

Propagation Models.

Vol. 12: E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker, SeaWiFS

Technical Report Series Cumulative Index:

Volumes 1–11.

Vol. 13: C.R. McClain, J.C. Comiso, R.S. Fraser, J.K.

Firestone, B.D. Schieber, E-n. Yeh, K.R. Arrigo, and C.W. Sullivan, Case Studies for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 1.

Vol. 14: J.L. Mueller, The First SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin Experiment, SIRREX-1,

July 1992.

Vol. 15: W.W. Gregg, F.S. Patt, and R.H. Woodward,

The Simulated SeaWiFS Data Set, Version 2.

Vol. 16: Mueller, J.L., B.C. Johnson, C.L. Cromer,

J.W. Cooper, J.T. McLean, S.B. Hooker, and

T.L. Westphal, The Second SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin Experiment, SIRREX-2, June 1993.

Vol. 17: Abbott, M.R., O.B. Brown, H.R. Gordon,

K.L. Carder, R.E. Evans, F.E. Muller-Karger,

and W.E. Esaias, Ocean Color in the 21st

Century: A Strategy for a 20 -Year Time Series.

1
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

Vol. 18: Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker, SeaWiFS

Technical Report Series Summary Index: Volumes 1–17.

Vol. 19: McClain, C.R., R.S. Fraser, J.T. McLean, M.

Darzi, J.K. Firestone, F.S. Patt, B.D. Schieber, R.H. Woodward, E-n. Yeh, S. Mattoo,

S.F. Biggar, P.N. Slater, K.J. Thome, A.W.

Holmes, R.A. Barnes, and K.J. Voss, Case

Studies for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 2.

Vol. 20: Hooker, S.B., C.R. McClain, J.K. Firestone,

T.L. Westphal, E-n. Yeh, and Y. Ge, The SeaWiFS Bio-Optical Archive and Storage System (SeaBASS), Part 1.

Vol. 21: Acker, J.G., The Heritage of SeaWiFS: A Retrospective on the CZCS NIMBUS Experiment

Team (NET) Program.

Vol. 22: Barnes, R.A., W.L. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, and

C.R. McClain, Prelaunch Acceptance Report

for the SeaWiFS Radiometer.

Vol. 23: Barnes, R.A., A.W. Holmes, W.L. Barnes,

W.E. Esaias, C.R. McClain, and T. Svitek,

SeaWiFS Prelaunch Radiometric Calibration

and Spectral Characterization.

This volume within the series serves as a reference, or

guidebook, to the aforementioned volumes. It consists of

the four main sections included with the first two indices

published, Volumes 6 and 12, in the series: a cumulative

index to key words and phrases, a glossary of acronyms,

a list of symbols used, and a bibliography of all references

cited in the series. In addition, as in Volumes 12 and 18,

errata and addenda sections have been added to address issues and needed corrections that have come to the editors’

attention since the volumes were first published.

The nomenclature of the index is a familiar one, in the

sense that it is a sequence of alphabetical entries, but it utilizes a unique format since multiple volumes are involved.

Unless indicated otherwise, the index entries refer to some

aspect of the SeaWiFS instrument or project, for example,

the mission overview index entry refers to an overview of

the SeaWiFS mission. An index entry is composed of a

keyword or phrase followed by an entry field that directs

the reader to the possible locations where a discussion of

the keyword can be found. The entry field is normally

made up of a volume identifier shown in bold face, followed by a pages identifier, which is always enclosed in

parentheses:

keyword, volume(pages).

If an entry is the subject of an entire volume, the volume

field is shown in slanted type without a page field:

keyword, Vol. #.

An entry can also be the subject of a complete chapter, as

in Volumes 13 and 19 (to name a few). In this instance,

both the volume number and chapter number appear without a page field:

keyword, Vol. # ch. #.

Figures or tables that provide particularly important summary information are also indicated as separate entries in

the page field. In this case, the figure or table number is

given with the page number on which it appears.

2. ERRATA

1. In Volume 23, Table 19, the headers entitled Radiance

and Counts should be switched.

3. ADDENDA

This section presents a summary of the Fifth SeaWIFS

Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Protocols Workshop

(BAOPW-5) held on 21 February 1995 at the Rosenstiel

School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences in Miami, Florida; submitted by C. McClain.

The primary workshop objectives were to:

1) finalize the initial operational SeaWiFS pigment,

K(490), and chlorophyll a algorithms;

2) review the field programs and bio-optical data

sets; and

3) discuss proposed changes in standard data products.

The team members and invited guests are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Team members and invited guests to the

BAOPW-5, held 21 February, 1995 at the Rosenstiel

School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences (RSMAS) in Miami, Florida. The subgroup memberships are as listed in Hooker et al. (1993). Attendees

are identified with a checkmark ().

Team Present Team Present

Members Members

J. Aiken O. Kopelevich

(G. Moore)  M. Lewis 

W. Balch  C. McClain 

K. Carder  G. Mitchell 

D. Clark  A. Morel

G. Cota  J. Mueller 

C. Davis  F. Muller- 

R. Doerffer  Karger

W. Esaias  D. Siegel 

H. Gordon  R. Smith

F. Hoge  C. Trees 

S. Hooker  C. Yentsch

D. Kamykowski J. Yoder 

M. Kishino  R. Zaneveld 

Other Attendees

R. Arnone S. Gallegos

J. Campbell S. Hawes

R. Evans N. Maynard

R. Frouin J. Morrow

H. Fukushima

2
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

3.1 BAOPW-5

1. Introduction (C. McClain):

A. Workshop Objectives and Agenda

B. Review of Action Items from the November Workshop

C. SeaStar/SeaWiFS Update

2. Data Set Development for Algorithm Evaluation (J.

Campbell): At the last bio-optical algorithm workshop

in November, it was agreed that investigators would

submit data for the verification of certain components

of the operational chlorophyll algorithm, as well as evaluate the final chlorophyll retrievals. Campbell agreed

to be the point of contact for the data submissions and

will provide a status report. She gave a brief summary

of what she personally has received [others have sent

data directly to the SeaWiFS Bio-Optical Archive and

Storage System (SeaBASS)]. She received data from A.

Bricaud, C. Yentsch, and M. Kishino. She will provide

these data to the SeaWiFS Project after some editing

and reformatting. Also, permission is being sought to

release Bricaud’s data to the SeaBASS archive.

3. Operational Chlorophyll a Algorithm (K. Carder): Only minor modifications have been made to the algorithm since the November 1994 meeting. Preliminary

analyses of Arabian Sea data and results from airborne

oceanographic lidar (AOL) data obtained from the MidAtlantic Bight compare well with the algorithm. Initial

analyses of California Cooperative Fisheries Institute

(CalCoFI) data, by G. Mitchell, indicate that the algorithm underestimates chlorophyll by a factor of 2–5.

Mitchell’s analysis, however, was based on the ratios

of subsurface upwelling radiance to subsurface downwelling irradiance and not remote sensing reflectances.

D. Siegel made a recommendation that should improve

the chlorophyll retrieval at low concentrations and will

provide the details to Carder later.

4. CZCS Pigment Algorithm (G. Moore): At the November workshop, G. Moore presented a draft document

for the bio-optics group to review and made a recommendation on a radiance ratio algorithm. The group

suggested that the algorithm should include a band ratio in the green. Moore has incorporated this suggestion and others and has submitted a revised version of

the document to the SeaWiFS Project for publication

in the SeaWiFS Technical Report Series.

5. K(490) Algorithm (J. Mueller): The results of Mueller’s analysis of the effect of the 5 nm shift in the 555 nm

SeaWiFS band from the 550 nm CZCS band indicates

the effect is small and that no change in the prelaunch

algorithm [the Austin-Petzold CZCS K(490) algorithm]

is required. The analysis was based on 44 optical profiles provided by C. Trees, D. Siegel, and G. Mitchell.

6. Final Results from the First Data Analysis RoundRobin (DARR-1) (D. Siegel): Siegel reviewed the results of the first data analysis round-robin, which had

not changed since the November meeting. For Case1 water, all the methods worked equally well below

600 nm, but diverged in the near-infrared. Turbid water cases were not considered. The summary document

has also been submitted to the SeaWiFS Project for

publication in the series.

7. Second Data Analysis Round-Robin (DARR-2) Planning (D. Siegel): Two topics of interest were discussed,

turbid water and the extrapolation of values to the surface from observations at discrete levels only as is the

case for moorings and drifters. C. Davis volunteered to

hold a workshop to discuss measurement protocols for

Case-2 waters, but thought it was premature to hold

a data analysis round-robin. D. Clark volunteered to

host DARR-2 to evaluate the analysis issue associated

with moorings and drifters. The dates for these events

will not be scheduled until the SeaWiFS launch schedule is clarified in April.

8. 18-Month Time Series of MER-2040/2041 Calibration

(G. Mitchell): The time series of the Scripps Photobiology Group’s MER-2040/2041 instrument calibration

for 18 months was presented. During this time, radiometric calibrations at Biospherical Instruments, Inc.

(BSI) and the San Diego State University (SDSU) Center for Hydro-Optics and Remote Sensing (CHORS)

have been completed with both integrating spheres and

reflectance plaques at each facility (total of three separate spheres and three separate plaques). Immersion

coefficients have been determined as well. The CHORS

and BSI calibrations are in good agreement for most

wavelengths. The calibrations are particularly consistent over the past three calibrations, the UV bands

being a notable exception. These results are tangible

evidence that the calibration round-robins are helping

to improve the reliability, consistency, and traceability

of the ocean color community’s instrument calibrations.

9. Protocol for Determining Algorithm Accuracy (J.

Campbell): In reporting the accuracy of a model or

algorithm, it is important to distinguish between systematic errors and random errors. A statement such as

“This algorithm is accurate to within 30%,” is very ambiguous. It says nothing about whether errors are random or systematic, and whether the range is 1 σ or 3 σ.

A protocol is presented here for determining the accuracy of an algorithm, and for testing and reporting both

systematic and random errors. Campbell distributed a

document describing the protocol and analysis based

on the CZCS NET algorithm data set.

10. Band-to-Band Correlation Analysis (J. Mueller): The

issue of instrumental band center wavelength differences was discussed at the May 1994 workshop (Firestone and Hooker 1995) and remains unresolved. Mueller has performed further empirical orthogonal function

3
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

(EOF) analyses on the NET data from D. Clark. The

analysis showed that in order to obtain a meaningful

result, the radiances had to be extrapolated to a common depth, e.g., the surface. For the irradiance fields,

the variance was contained in the first few EOFs, but

for upwelling radiance, a large number were required.

His conclusion was that the data was too noisy for this

analysis and that more recent data from higher quality

spectrometers should be used. Such data exists from a

number of sources and he will pursue this work further.

11. Field Program Reports: The intent of these reports is

not to present results, but activities. Updates should

review recent and future cruise plans, numbers of stations, data collected, status of analysis and data delivery to the SeaWiFS Project, etc. Each presentation

should be no longer than 15 minutes.

A. Bermuda Bio-Optical Time Series (D. Siegel): The

bio-optical data collection will continue until at least

December 1995. After that time, Siegel is unclear

how the time-series will be supported. It appears

unlikely, at this time, that the National Science

Foundation (NSF) will support the program in fiscal year (FY) 1996 and he is not optimistic about

NSF support in FY97.

B. CalCoFI Bio-Optical Data Set (G. Mitchell): Mitchell has cruises planned in April, July, and October 1995. During each cruise, about 70 bio-optical

stations will be taken.

C. Navy Field Program Update (C. Davis): The Navy,

NASA, and NSF will support a total of eight cruises

with optics in the Arabian Sea. During the last

cruise, much of the time was spent towing an instrument array. Nonetheless, 20 bio-optical stations were collected. Their bio-optical measurement

suite included radiometer profiles, remote sensing

reflectance measurements, and Q measurements.

D. United Kingdom Field Program Update (G. Moore):

The British have a fair number of cruises scheduled for 1995 and 1996. Of particular interest is the

Antarctic Survey’s transects of the Atlantic during

May and September of each year. These cruises

have many berths available and will stop daily for

bio-optical casts (2 hours maximum station time).

The Falkland Islands would be the point of departure for the September leg and the point of embarkation for the May leg.

E. Japanese Field Program Update (M. Kishino): The

Japanese have an impressive manifest of bio-optical

cruises scheduled in the Pacific (from the Bering Sea

to Antarctica) during 1995 and 1996. (The manifest is too long to recite here.) The Yamato Bank

Optical Mooring (YBOM) will be deployed during

April–July 1996 [Ocean Color Temperature Sensor

(OCTS) check-out] and again in September 1996 after refurbishment. YBOMwill be in a year-long cycle whereby it will be in the water for nine months,

and then out of the water for three months, for refurbishment.

F. German Field Program Update (R. Doerffer): The

Germans will be in the Arabian Sea during July and

will collect in-water bio-optical and remote sensing reflectance data. Doerffer described the Picasso

Program proposal to put four optical platforms in

place. Picasso participants include the Joint Research Center (JRC) and the British. The platform

sites are the northern Adriatic, Baltic, and North

Seas.

12. Proposed Scheme for Variable QualityLevel-3 Products (R. Evans): Evans described his proposal for incorporating variable quality data into the level-3 products. The scheme allows for level-2 data, which is

deemed less accurate or reliable, to be binned when

no higher quality data is available for a particular binning cell. The scheme can be applied in either space or

time binning. Before the scheme can be accepted, the

Science Working Group (SWG) must approve it. The

bio-optics group voice general support for the concept.

A more detailed description will be circulated to the

SWG for comment.

13. Proposed Revisions in the Level-3 Products (C. McClain): The present set of quality masks and flags used

as exclusion criteria in the level-3 binning process are

defined so as to yield high quality pigment and K(490)

level-3 products; all other parameters binned in the

level-3 product are subject to the same criteria. At the

present time, there is only one level-3 product containing several binned quantities. As a result, the level-3

product eliminates useful information on some quantities of interest, e.g., coccolithophore blooms and high

aerosol radiances. Defining additional level-3 products, using exclusion criteria appropriate to each product while eliminating parameters of limited utility from

the present level-3 product, would extend the applications for SeaWiFS, but not substantially increase the

number of data granules or volumes submitted to the

Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC). Examples of this might

be a pigment product, a coccolithophore product, or

an aerosol product. The bio-optics group endorsed the

idea of smaller, but more numerous level-3 products

and McClain will circulate a strawman to the SWG for

comment.

3.1.1 Action Items

The following are the action items, and people responsible for them, that arose from the meeting.

4
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

1. J. Campbell will submit the Bricaud and Morel

absorption data and the Yentsch pigment data

to the SeaWiFS Project for inclusion in the SeaBASS database.

2. K. Carder will submit the data set he is using

for the chlorophyll algorithm.

3. D. Clark will organize and host DARR-2.

4. C. Davis will organize and host a workshop on

turbid Case-2 data collection and analysis.

5. D. Siegel will work with K. Carder on a modification to the chlorophyll a algorithm to improve

estimates at low values.

6. J. Mueller will pursue higher quality spectral

data for the EOF analysis. Possible sources of

this are D. Clark and C. Davis.

7. C. McClain and R. Evans will draft strawmen

proposals for revisions in the level-3 products.

These will be circulated together for comment

by the SWG.

5
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

Cumulative Index

Unless indicated otherwise, the index entries that follow refer to some aspect of the SeaWiFS instrument or

project. For example, the mission overview index entry

refers to an overview of the SeaWiFS mission.

–A–

absorption study:

pressure and oxygen, 13(ch. 3).

absorption correction, 13(19–20).

acceptance report:

prelaunch, see SeaWiFS instrument.

addenda, 12(3–8); 18(3–22).

Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer, see AVHRR.

aerosol models, 8(17).

airborne spectral radiometry, 5(7–8).

aircraft calibration technique, 3(Fig. 19 p. 27).

algorithms, 1(3, 17); 4(2).

atmospheric correction, 1(19); 3(1–2, Fig. 4 p. 5, 16, 23,

27–28, 31, 32–34); 8(4, Table 1 p. 14, 17, Table 4 p. 21);

13(1, 4, 9, 27); 17(16); 18(11–12); 21(19–20).

bio-optical, Vol. 5; 12(3–5); 20(ch. 3).

data, 9(1); 12(3–4).

database development, 3(28).

derived products, 3(27–28); 13(1).

development, 1(5); 3(23, 27–35, Fig. 22 p. 33); 5(Table 4

p. 11); 8(4, 10).

field studies, 3(30–32, Fig. 22 p. 33, 34–35).

input values, 13(Table 16 p. 44).

linearity and stability, 5(12).

optical measurements, Vol. 5.

pigment, 3(28, 29); 8(24); 13(1, 12); 18(3, 4, 14).

validation of, 1(3); 8(16, Table 4 p. 21).

see also bio-optical, algorithm.

see also GAC.

see also Protocols Workshop.

along-track, 3(38).

see also propagation model.

ancillary:

data climatologies, 13(2, ch. 7, and Plates 16–18).

data sets, 8(7); 15(7); 19(ch. 6, ch. 7).

measurements, 5(8, 9, 20, 27–28, 30, 33).

see also data, ancillary.

animation:

meteorological data sets, 13(41–42).

ozone data sets, 13(41–42).

ascending node, Vol. 2.

computation methods, 2(1–2).

tilt strategy, 2(Table 1 p. 2).

atmospheric conditions, 9(6–7).

atmospheric contributions, 9(4–6).

atmospheric correction, 1(3, 5, 7); 3(1, 2, Fig. 4 p. 5, 8, 13, 23,

24, 27, 28–29, 31, 32–34); 4(1); 5(1, 3, 6, 7, 10, 13); 8(4,

6, 7, 26–27, 30–31, 36–37, 42); 14(1); 17(6, 16); 18(13);

19(ch. 1, Fig. 1 p. 11); 21(19–20).

subgroup, 18(11–12).

atmospheric correction cont.

see also algorithms, atmospheric correction.

atmospheric measurements, 5(2, 28–29).

at-satellite radiances, 15(7–13, Table 10 p. 11).

AVHRR:

deriving vegetation index, 7(2).

GAC data, 7(3–4).

LAC data, 7(2–4).

LDTNLR test, 7(4).

nighttime IR data, 7(5).

thermal IR channels, 7(1).

azimuth:

angles at equinox, 2(2, 10, 16).

angles at solstice, 2(Fig. 5 p. 7, 10, 16).

satellite angle, 13(46).

solar angle, 2(2, 16); 7(1); 13(Table 11 p. 29, 46).

spacecraft angle, 2(2, Fig. 6 p. 8, 16); 13(Table 11 p. 29).

relative angle, 2(2, Fig. 7 p. 9, 10, Fig. 10 p. 13, 16).

–B–

baselines, 8(6–13).

algorithms, 8(6–7).

ancillary data, 8(7).

data archive and delivery, 8(9–10).

data for bio-optical algorithms, 8(10).

data for vicarious calibration, 8(10–11).

data processing and software, 8(8–9).

data products, 8(12–13).

data quality and acceptance, 8(7–8).

detector failure contingency, 8(11).

equator crossing contingency, 8(12).

ground station support, 8(11).

in situ data policy, 8(13).

launch slip contingency, 8(11).

level-2 masks and flags, 18(Table 9 p. 18).

level-2 products, 18(Table 7 p. 17).

level-3 binned products, 18(Table 8 p. 17).

level-3 binning, 8(8, 16).

loss of tilt contingency, 8(11).

navigation accuracy contingency, 8(11).

optical protocols, 8(12).

orbit contingency, 8(12).

orbital altitude contingency, 8(11).

power limitation contingency, 8(11).

products, 3(27–28); 5(1).

real-time data access, 8(12).

recommendations, 8(13–19).

revised product list, 18(16–18).

see also data.

basin-scale processes, 1(4, 6–7).

biogeochemical, 1(2, 19); 8(1).

properties, 5(6–7).

see also Science Team Meeting, Abstracts.

bio-optical:

algorithm working group members, 8(Table 1 p. 14); 12(Table 1 p. 3, 3); 18(Table 1 p. 3, Table 5 p. 12, Table 6 p. 14).

6
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

bio-optical cont.

Algorithm Workshop, 12(3–5, 6–8); 18(3–7, 12–16, 10).

algorithms, 1(19); 3( 1–2, 6, 8, 11–12, 13, 16, 23, 28–29,

Fig. 20 p. 29, 29, 30–31, 32, Fig. 22 p. 33, 34); 4(3); Vol. 5;

8(6, 10); 13(27).

data 12(Table 2 p. 4).

data set, 3(8, 13, 16, 29, 30); 18(4, Table 2 p. 5).

data system 20(ch. 2).

see also algorithm.

see also algorithm development.

bio-optics, 1(3, 5, 7, 19); 8(10).

algorithm, 13(1, ch. 1, 27).

bright target recovery, 15(Fig. 8 p. 15).

Brouwer-Lyddane model, 11(2–5, 11, 15–16, Figs. 5–8 pp. 8–9,

Fig. 13 p. 12); 15(2–3).

see also models.

buoy:

see MOBY.

see optical buoy.

see optical mooring.

–C–

calibration, 5(2); 10(Tables 1–2 p. 4, Fig. 3 p. 6, Fig. 20 p. 23,

Fig. 21 p. 24); Vol. 14; Vol. 16.

background on, 10(2–3).

equations, 23(8–14, 18).

experiment, 19(Fig. 14 p. 29; Table 16 p. 30; Figs. 15–17

pp. 31–32).

initialization, 5(4–6).

in situ instruments, 14(2).

lunar, 1(11, 18); 3(Fig. 15 p. 22); 10(1–3, 7, 10, Table 3 p. 10,

Fig. 9 p. 11, Figs. 12–15 pp. 14–17, Fig. 16 p. 20, Fig. 19

p. 22, Table 4–5 p. 19, 25); 15(Fig. 2 p. 5, Table 5 p. 7,

Figs. 22–23 pp. 34–35).

onboard, 3(21); 5(2–3); 10(1–2).

pigment, 5(24).

preflight solar-based, 19(ch. 3).

quality control, 10(25).

round-robin, 8(4, 17, Table 4 p. 21); Vol. 14; Vol. 16; 18(3, 9,

13–14, 15).

sensor, 1(11); 5(2–3); 17(2, 3).

solar, 1(11, 18); 3(24); 10(1–7, Fig. 2 p. 5, Fig. 4 p. 6, Figs. 5–

8 pp. 8–9, Figs. 10–11 pp. 12–13, 18); 15(Fig. 3 p. 6, Table 5

p. 7, Fig. 20 p. 32).

solar diffuser, 10(3–5, 7); 23(10).

spectral, 5(24).

sphere test, 14(Fig. B2 p. 48, Table B2 p. 49).

subgroup meeting, 18(11).

sun photometers, 5(24).

system test, 14(Fig. B1 p. 48).

trend analysis, 10(25).

vicarious, 5(2–4); 8(10–11).

working group members, 8(Table 1 p. 14).

see also calibration and validation.

see also round-robin.

see also SeaStar.

see also SIRREX.

calibration cont.

see also sphere.

calibration and validation, 1(3, 8, 14, 18–22); Vol. 3; 17(3, 5–6,

10–14, 15).

baselines, 3(17); 8(3).

case studies, Vol. 13; Vol. 19.

cruises, 17(15–17).

field deployment, 8(17, Table 2 p. 18, Table 4 p. 20); 18(Fig. 1

p. 6).

on board, 3(21–23).

post-launch, 3(23–27).

prelaunch program, 3(17–21).

program milestones, 3(Fig. 12 p. 14).

program schematic, 3(Fig. 11 p. 14).

team (CVT), 13(1).

see also baselines.

see also calibration.

see also CVT.

see also initialization.

see also round-robin.

CDF, 13(35, Table 14 p. 36); 19(ch. 5).

characterization:

collector cosine response, 5(18–19).

immersion factors, 5(19–20).

pressure effects, 5(21).

radiance field-of-view, 5(18).

radiometric, 5(15–17).

spectral bandpass, 5(15).

temperature, 5(20–21).

temporal response, 5(17).

chlorophyll concentration, 1(4–5, 15); 3(27, 34); 4(2); 7(1);

8(14, 24, 30, 36); 9(1, 3, 9); 14(1); 15(7); 17(2, 5); 19

(Fig. 7 p. 17, Fig. 11 p. 20).

climatology generation, 13(40–41).

cloud detection, 7(1, 5).

MODIS, 7(1).

see also MODIS-N.

cloud screening, Vol. 7.

determining thresholds, 7(2–3).

direct thresholds, 7(1–4).

evaluating methods, 7(5–6).

more complex methods, 7(4–5).

spatial coherence, 7(3–4).

see also AVHRR GAC data.

COADS:

data, 13(Plates 16–18).

time series, 13(36–40).

Coastal Zone Color Scanner, see CZCS.

command:

schedules, 15(3–7, Table 3 p. 4, Table 4 p. 6).

sequence, 15(Tables 7–8 p. 11).

commercial applications, 1(7).

Common Data Format, see CDF.

Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set, see COADS.

contingencies:

detector failure, 8(11).

7
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

contingencies cont.

equator crossing, 8(12).

launch slip, 8(11).

loss of tilt, 8(11).

navigation accuracy, 8(11).

orbit, 8(12).

orbital altitude, 8(11).

power limitation, 8(11).

correction study:

pressure and oxygen, 13(ch. 4).

cross-track, see propagation model.

cross-track scan, see SeaWiFS instrument.

cumulative:

index, 6(1–3); 12(9–13); 18(23–28).

CVT, 13(1).

CZCS, 1(1, 5, 6–7, 19); 3(1).

algorithms, 3(1–11, 23); 13(ch. 1); 19(ch. 1).

application of data, 9(7–9).

calibration and validation, 17(10–11).

channels, 7(1, 5).

data collection, 3(6, Fig. 5 p. 5, 21, 30), 7(1).

global sampling, 3(Fig. 9 p. 10).

level-2 products, 4(1).

level-2 processing parameters, 4(Table 2 p. 2).

modeling compared to SeaWiFS, 3(Fig. 4 p. 5).

orbit, 3(2).

orbital characteristics, 9(Table 2 p. 3).

overlapping scenes study, 13(ch. 5).

parameters and characteristics, 1(Table 2 p. 5), 3(Table 1

p. 1).

pigment algorithm, 13(Tables 12–13 p. 31).

pigment concentration, 1(5–6); 3(1–2, 8, 27); 13(1, 2, ch. 1,

Figs. 1–5 pp. 5–8, 9, Figs. 8–9 p. 11, 15, Figs. 14–16 pp. 17–

18, 22, Figs. 18–19 p. 26, Fig. 20 p. 28, Table 10 p. 29, ch. 6,

Table 18 p. 45, and Plates: 1–14, and 19–20); 17(6–7).

quality control, 3(Fig. 7 p. 8, Fig. 8 p. 9, 32, 35).

ringing mask comparison, 13(2, ch. 8, and Plate 19).

sensor, 1(5); 3(8).

sensor degradation, 3(23).

time of launch, 2(1).

vicarious calibration, 3(Fig. 6 p. 7, 11, 23, 24–27); 5(3–4).

see also bio-optical, algorithms.

see also NET.

–D–

dark level, see SeaWiFS instrument.

data:

access of, 8(12); 17(17).

acquisition, 19(21–22).

ancillary, 3(24, 35); 5(3); 7(5); 8(7); 13(2, Fig. 23 p. 36);

19(ch. 6, ch. 7).

archive and delivery, 5(2); 8(9–10).

collection, 3(24); 8(4).

distribution, 1(16); 8(2, 4, 16, 17).

format, 3(32); 8(43–44); 12(5); 15(16–20, Fig. 9 p. 17); 19

(ch. 5).

interpolation, 13(22).

data cont.

management, 1(3, 11–18); 3(32).

policy, 3(37–38); 8(13, Table 4 p. 21, 41–42).

processing, 1(3, Fig. 2 p. 4, 11–16, Fig. 10 p. 20, 22); 3(13,

32); 7(5); 8(4, 8–9); 13(16, 21, 35); 17(3); 20(17–18).

products, 4(20); 8(8, 12–13, 15–17, Table 4 pp. 20–21, 42–43);

15(2).

quality and acceptance, 8(7–8).

requirements, 5(4–6).

standard format, 19(ch. 5).

subsampling, 4(1).

system, 17(3–4, 12–14); 20(ch. 2).

using SEAPAK with, 4(1–2).

data sets, 1(3); 5(3–4, 6, 8, 14, 33, 34, 35); 8(23, 33); Vol. 9;

Vol. 15; 17(2, 5).

animation of, 13(41–42).

atmospheric conditions, 9(6–7).

atmospheric contributions, 9(4–6).

availability of, 9(9–13); 15(40).

code for simulating, 9(13–15).

currently held, 20(Table 2 p. 10).

external, 15(Table 9 p. 11).

gridded wind, 19(ch. 8).

meteorological, 13(35, Table 14 p. 36); 19(43, 47).

meteorological animation, 13(41–42).

methods for simulating, 9(2–7).

normalized water-leaving radiances, 9(2–3).

orbit model, 9(3–4).

ozone, 13(35, Fig. 31 p. 42); 19(43, 47).

ozone animation, 13(41–42).

simulated total radiances, 9(Figs. 2–4 pp. 10–12).

start and stop times, 9(Table 6 p. 9).

ten-bit words and data structures, 9(7).

viewing and solar geometries, 9(4–6).

see also bio-optical.

see also SIRREX.

see also storage.

descending node, Vol. 2.

see also ascending node.

detector failure contingency, see contingencies.

–E–

EOS-Color, 17(3, 9–10, 11, 13–17).

EOSDIS, 17(3, 13, 17).

equator crossing time, 2(10, 16); 9(Tables 6–7 p. 9).

contingency, 8(12).

equinox:

see azimuth.

see sun glint.

see zenith.

errata, 12(2); 18(2–3).

–F–

field deployment, see calibration and validation.

field-of-view, see SeaWiFS instrument.

field program, 18(5, 15).

8
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

field program cont.

computing network, 3(Fig. 21 p. 31).

instrumentation, 3(34–35).

filter radiometer, 14(Table B9 p. 56).

flags, 18(4–5).

algorithm, 8(3, 4, 17).

level-2, 18(Table 9 p. 18).

level-2 processing, 8(7); 12(4, Table 3 p. 4).

format:

conventions, 20(4–5).

standard data, 8(15); 19(ch. 5).

–G–

GAC, 1(3, 16); 15(4); 17(5, 12).

algorithms, Vol. 4.

AVHRR data, 7(3).

data, 15(2, 21–27, Figs. 11–14 pp. 22–25, and Plates 1–2).

generation mechanisms, 4(Table 1 p. 1).

generation methods, Vol. 4.

resolution, 4(Plates 1–8).

sampling techniques, Vol. 4.

see also AVHRR.

geometry, 2(1).

derived parameters, 2(1).

solar, 2(1, 10, 16).

sun glint, 2(1).

viewing, 2(1, 10, 16).

see also azimuth.

see also zenith.

glint correction, 3(23); 8(17); 19(ch. 1, Fig. 1 p. 11).

see also sun glint.

global area coverage, see GAC.

global-scale processes, 1(6–7).

glossary:

cumulative, 6(3–5); 12(14–17); 18(29–33).

ground coverage, 2(2, Fig. 1 p. 3).

ground station support, 8(11).

ground systems and support, 1(14–15).

–H–

Hierarchical Data Format, see HDF.

HDF, 8(7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15); 13(ch. 7); 19(ch. 5).

HRPT:

data, 1(14, 19); 8(8–9, 19); 15(2, 4, 27, Figs. 24–27 pp. 36–39,

and Plates 4–6).

policies, 8(17, Table 4 p. 20).

–I–

index, Vol. 6; Vol. 12; Vol. 18.

infrared radiometers, 7(1).

initialization, 5(4–6, Table 1 p. 5).

sampling, 5(31–32).

intercalibration, Vol. 14; Vol. 16.

data archive 14(56–57, Tables C1 and C2 p. 57).

sources, 14(Table 1 p. 4).

– J, K –

joint commercial aspects, 1(8).

–L–

LAC, 1(3).

data, 1(8, 11); 15(2, 4, 27, Figs. 16–19 pp. 28–31, and Plate

3).

lamps, Vol. 14; Vol. 16.

apparent drift, 14(Fig. 6 p. 13).

calibration setup, 14(Fig. B7 p. 53).

GSFC reference, 14(Table 3 p. 12).

irradiance, 14(Fig. B4 p. 50, Table B5 p. 52, Fig. B8 p. 53,

Table B7 p. 55).

operating currents, 14(Table 8 p. 28).

standards, 16(3–23).

see also calibration.

see also spectral irradiance.

see also spectral radiance.

see also sphere.

see also transfer.

look-up tables, 8(4); 19(5–9).

lunar observations, Vol. 10.

lunar reflectance, 3(23); 10(2–3, 7–25); 19(ch. 2); 23(9).

–M–

marine optical buoy:

see MOBY.

see optical buoy.

mask, 18(4–5).

algorithm, 8(3, 4, 17).

level-2, 18(Table 9 p. 18).

level-2 processing, 3(6); 8(7); 12(4, Table 3 p. 4).

Miami edge, 13(29).

see also sun glint.

measurement protocols, 5(26–33).

meeting agenda, see Science Team Meeting.

mesoscale processes, 1(6).

Miami edge mask, 13(29).

mission:

operations, 1(14–18); 11(1–2, 15).

overlap, 17(12).

overview, Vol. 1; 8(1).

MOBY, 1(3); 8(3, 4).

review attendees, 18(Table 4 p. 10).

review summary, 18(9–11).

system schematic, 3(Fig. 17 p. 25).

see also optical buoy.

see also optical mooring.

modeling, 10(1, 10, 18, 25).

models:

aerosol, 19(5–7, Tables 1–2 p. 6, Fig. 6 p. 17).

chlorophyll concentration, 19(Fig. 7 p. 17, Fig. 11 p. 20).

orbital prediction, 1(17).

see also Brouwer-Lyddane models.

see also modeling.

see also perturbation models.

9
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

models cont.

see also propagation models.

MODIS or MODIS-N, 1(19); 17(3, 5, 6–7, 8, 11, 13–15).

instrument characteristics, 3(Table 4 p. 12).

presentations, 8(3–5).

modulation transfer function, see SeaWiFS instrument, MTF.

–N–

navigation, 8(11); 9(4); 11(2); 15(3).

of pixels, 9(4).

NET, 3(2, Figs. 1–3 pp. 2–4, 23, 27, 28, 29–30); 8(16); 12(4);

Vol. 21.

areas of responsibility, 21(2–3).

atmospheric correction algorithm, 21(19–20).

chronology of events, 21(3–11).

pigment algorithm, 3(Fig. 3 p. 3, Fig. 20 p. 29).

research methods, 21(11, 16, 19).

sea-truth program, 21(11, Fig. 1 p. 12, Tables 2–6 pp. 13–14,

Figs. 2–6 pp. 15–18).

team members, 21(Table 1 p. 3).

netCDF, 19(ch. 5).

NIMBUS Experiment Team, see NET.

normalized water-leaving radiances, 1(15); 3(2, 6, 24, 28–29,

37–38); 4(1–3, 20); 5(1, 3–4, 6, 8, 13, 31–32, 37–38); 8(16,

42); 9(2–3).

non-research uses, 1(7–8).

–O–

ocean color, 1(1–4, 8, 10); 8(1–3, 22–43); 13(1, ch. 4); Vol. 17.

future missions, 3(Fig. 10 p. 12).

requirements, 1(2).

see also algorithm development.

ocean optics protocols, Vol. 5; 8(12, 14–15, Table 4 p. 20).

see also Protocols Workshop.

OCTS, 1(2); 3(11); 17(4, 10, 13, 17).

instrument characteristics, 3(Table 3 p. 11).

operational applications, 1(7–8).

optical buoy, 3(Fig. 17 p. 25).

drifting, 5(9, 31).

mooring, 3(Fig. 18 p. 26); 5(8, 30–31).

see also MOBY.

optical instruments, Vol. 5; 10(Figs. 17–19 pp. 21–22).

optical measurements, 5(1).

accuracy specifications, 5(9–15).

analysis methods, 5(33–39).

science community, role of, 5(3).

sensor characterization, 5(15–25, Tables 2–4 pp. 10–11).

see also MOBY.

see also optical buoy.

optical thickness, 8(17); 19(5, 7, Tables 3–4 p. 7, Tables 8–11

p. 10).

Rayleigh, 3(34); 9(4–6, Table 4 p. 5); 13(ch. 3, ch. 4).

orbit, 3(23).

characteristics, 9(Table 2 p. 3).

contingency, 8(12).

distribution of local time, 2(Fig. 2 p. 4).

orbit cont.

downlink, 15(4, Table 3 p. 4).

parameters, 1(18); 2(2).

propagation, 15(3, Table 3 p. 3).

see also propagation model.

orbital:

altitude contingency, 8(11).

characteristics, 9(1, Table 3 p. 3); 15(Table 1b p. 3).

elements, 11(2).

overview, Vol. 1.

see also index.

oxygen absorption band, 13(16, 19, Fig. 17 p. 19).

ozone:

absorption, 13(9, 21).

concentration, 8(7); 9(5); 13(9, Figs. 6–7 p. 10, Figs. 11–12

p. 13, 30, and Plate 15); 16(7, 8).

control point value, 13(Tables 7–9 pp. 24–25).

correction, 13(ch. 4, and Plates 7–13).

data analysis, 13(1, ch. 2).

images, 13(Plates 7–13).

optical thickness, 13(Fig. 10 p. 12).

see also data set, ozone.

–P–

perturbations model:

general, 11(2–3).

special, 11(2).

photodetector measurements, 14(Table A1 p. 47).

pigment, 17(7).

algorithm, 3(28, 29); 8(24).

data, 9(2).

database, 20(ch. 3).

data sets, 20(18, Table 5 pp. 20–21, 21).

concentration, 1(Plates 1–5); 3(1, 2, 6, 8, 13, 23, 27, 28,

31–32, 35); 4(Table 1 p. 1, 2, Table 3 p. 3, Figs. 5–11

pp. 6–9, 20, and Plates 1–8); 5(2); 7(1); 8(4, 14, 24, 30,

36, 40); 13(ch. 2, ch. 3); 17(7, 11, 15–16).

mean, 13(Tables 1–2 p. 8).

values, 4(Fig. 26 p. 15, Figs. 31–33 pp. 18–19).

see also algorithm, pigment.

see also calibration.

see also CZCS, pigment concentration.

pixel size, 3(Fig. C1 p. 39).

Prelaunch Science Working Group, see SPSWG.

pressure:

surface, see surface pressure.

pressure and oxygen:

absorption study, 13(ch. 3).

correction study, 13(ch. 4, and Plates: 8, 10, and 12).

primary productivity, 1(1); 5(7); 8(1, 15, 22–41); 17(8–9).

working group members, 8(Table 1 p. 14).

proceedings:

Science Team Meeting, Vol. 8.

see also Science Team Meeting.

Project, 1(3); 3(1, 13, 16, 23–24, 32, 34, 38).

goals, 1(2–3).

10
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

Project cont.

objectives, 1(3).

organization and personnel, 1(Table 4 p. 22); 3(Fig. 13 p. 15).

presentations, 8(3–5).

responsibilities, 12(3–4).

schematic, 1(Fig. 8 p. 12, Fig. 9 p. 13).

structure, 3(13–16).

propagation model:

along-track, 11(5, Figs. 1–8 pp. 6–9, Fig. 11 p. 11, Figs. 12–14

pp. 12–13, Fig. 16 p. 14).

cross-track, 11(5, Fig. 9 p. 10, Fig. 15 p. 13, Fig. 17 p. 14).

orbit, Vol. 11.

radial, 11(4, 5, Fig. 10 p. 10).

Protocols Workshop, (ocean optics), 12(3, 5–8).

attendees addresses, 12(6–8).

Subgroup Workshop, 18(3, 7–9, 12–13, 14–16).

team members and guests, 12(Table 1 p. 3); 18(Table 1 p. 3,

Table 3 p. 7, Table 5 p. 12, Table 6 p. 14); 18(19–22).

see also ocean optics.

–Q–

quality control, 3(29–30, 35–36); 10(Fig. 20 p. 23): 12(5).

flags, 12(3–4).

level-1 screening, 3(35).

level-2 product screening, 3(35–36).

level-2 quality control, 3(35); 8(4).

level-3 product screening, 3(36).

masks, 12(4).

see also bio-optical algorithm workshop.

–R–

radial, see propagation model.

radiance measurements, 14(Table 9 pp. 29–30, Table 10 p. 31,

Fig. 15 p. 32, Table 11 pp. 33–35, 44); 16(Table 6–7 pp. 37–

44); 19(Figs. 2–6 pp. 14–15, 23).

calibration factors, 16(Fig. 18 p. 46).

output, 14(Table 12–14 pp. 38–41).

see also spectral irradiance.

see also spectral radiance.

radiometer, see SeaWiFS instrument.

radiometric calibration, Vol. 23.

see also SeaWiFS instrument.

radiometric profiles, 5(33–39).

radiometric specifications, 3(36–37, Table A1 p. 36); 8(4).

references:

cumulative, 6(5–9); 12(21–28); 18(38–46).

CZCS data, 21(23–41).

reflectance:

gradients, 10(2–3); 19(Tables 6–7 p. 8, 8).

plaque, 5(15–17); 14(5, 31, 41); 16(111).

research:

applications, 1(3–5).

cruises, 3(30–32).

round-robin, Vol. 14; Vol. 16.

calibration, 8(4, 17, Table 4 p. 21); 12(4).

protocols working group, 8(Table 1 p. 14); 18(Table 3 p. 7).

see also calibration, round-robin.

–S–

satellite remote sensing, 7(1).

saturation radiances, 3(Tables A2 through A4 pp. 36–37); 15

(Table 11 p. 13); 19(Table 5 p. 8).

SBRC database, see SIRREX, SBRC database.

scale, Vol. 14.

see also transfer.

scanning characteristics, 9(1).

science mission goals, 3(12–13).

Science Team Meeting, Vol. 8.

abstracts, 8(22–41).

agenda, 8(5–6).

attendees, 8(51–59).

executive committee, 8(22).

invited presentations, 8(1–3).

questionnaire, 8(19–22, 44–51).

SeaBASS, Vol. 20.

file architecture, 20(ch. 1).

SEAPAK, 4(1–2, 20).

SeaStar, 1(1, 3, 8); 2(1–2); 3(21); 10(3,7).

launch sequence, 1(Fig. 4 p. 9).

operational system, 1(Fig. 6 p. 10).

orbital simulation parameters, 2(Table 1 p. 2); 11(Table 1

p. 1).

pitch rate, 10(7).

satellite, 1(Fig. 5 p. 9).

spacecraft description, 1(8–10).

SeaWiFS instrument, 1(1, 5–6, 8, 10–11); 4(1); 5(6, 9–14);

8(7–8, 17).

absolute accuracy, 22(19–20).

acceptance report, prelaunch, Vol. 22.

acceptance testing, 8(4, 13–14, Table 4 p. 20).

band co-registration, 22(10–11, Fig. 5 p. 12, Tables 12–13

p. 12).

band edge wavelengths, 23(51, Table 13 p. 52).

band tolerances, 22(7–8, Tables 5–7 p. 9).

bandwidths, 1(Table 1 p. 1, Fig. 2 p. 2, 11).

bilinear gains, 23(2, 4, Fig. 4 p. 5, Tables 1–4 p. 6, 6–7, Fig. 5

p. 8, 18).

calibration and characterization, 3(Fig. 14 p. 18); 8(4).

calibration constants, 23(17–18, Table 9 p. 19).

calibration equations, 23(8–14, 18).

characteristics, 2(Table 1 p. 2); 3(Table 2 p. 11, 13).

cross-track scan, 22(4, Figs. 3–4 p. 6, 7).

dark level, 22(7).

description of, 1(10–11); 23(2, Figs. 1–3 pp. 3–4).

dynamic range, 22(14, Tables 16–18 p. 17).

field-of-view, 1(11); 5(1, 10, 12–18, 20–24, 28–29, 31, 38);

22(2, Fig. 1 p. 3, 4, Fig. 2 p. 5, Table 3 p. 4).

fore-and-aft pointing, 22(7, Table 4 p. 7).

gains, 22(18, Table 21 p. 19); 23(14–17).

in-flight data, 22(29).

launch time, 2(1).

major milestones, 3(Table 7 p. 21); 22(Table 1 p. 2).

mirror sides, 23(7–8, Table 5 p. 9).

monitoring of, 1(18).

11
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

SeaWiFS instrument cont.

MTF, 22(14, Tables 19–20 pp. 18–19).

operations schedules, 1(17–18).

out-of-band response, 22(8, Tables 8–11 pp. 10–11); 23(51,

Table 14 p. 53).

pointing knowledge, 22(24, 28).

polarization, 22(12–14, Table 15 p. 13, Figs. 6–7 pp. 15–16).

radiometric calibration, Vol. 23.

scanner, 1(11, Fig. 7 p. 14).

sensitivities, 1(5, Fig. 3 p. 6); 5(Table 4 p. 11, 14); 22(11–12,

Table 14 p. 13).

spectral bands, 1(11); 9(1, Table 1 p. 2).

spectral characterization, Vol. 23.

spectral differences, 22(8, 10).

spectral response, 23(21–43).

stability and repeatability, 22(28–29).

stray light response, 23(2, 13).

system level response, 23(43–51).

telemetry parameters, 3(Table 8 p. 23).

temperature factors, 23(18–21).

testing and design, 22(1–2).

test plan summary, 3(Table 6 pp. 19–20).

transient response, 22(18–19, Tables 22–23 p. 20).

vicarious calibration, 5(3–4, 33).

see also optical instruments.

see also solar diffuser.

sensor:

calibration, 5(2–3).

characterization, 5(15–25); 9(Table 2 p. 3); 15(13).

CZCS, see CZCS.

monitoring, 1(18).

operations schedules, 1(17).

ringing, 4(2).

ringing mask, 13(2, 27, and Plate 19).

saturation response, 15(13, 27–39).

SeaWiFS, see SeaWiFS instrument.

tilt, 15(Fig. 1 p. 5).

see also characterization.

see also CZCS, ring mask comparison.

see also SeaWiFS instrument.

see also solar diffuser.

ship shadow avoidance, 5(25–26).

shunt, 16(111–116).

tests, 14(41–42).

SIRREX:

database, 20(ch. 4).

SBRC database, 20(ch. 5).

see also SIRREX-1.

see also SIRREX-2.

SIRREX-1, Vol. 14; 18(9).

attendees, 14(57–58).

equipment and tests, 14(Table B1 p. 49).

participants, 14(Table 1 p. 4).

validation process, 14(Fig. 1 p. 3).

SIRREX-2, Vol. 16; 18(9).

attendees, 16(116–118).

SIRREX-2 cont.

equipment and tests, 16(Table A1 p. 117).

participants, 16(Table A1 p. 117).

SIRREX-3, 18(9, 13, 16).

solar diffuser, 3(11, 13, 21, 23, 24, 38); 5(2, 17, 19, 22); 8(13,

36); Vol. 10; 15(7, Table 8 p. 11, 27, Figs. 20–21 pp. 32–33);

17(13); 19(26–32, Figs. 11–12 p. 28); 23(9–10).

solar irradiance measurements, 3(Fig. 16 p. 22).

solar observations, Vol. 10.

see also calibration.

solstice:

see azimuth.

see sun glint.

see zenith.

spectral bands, 1(1–2); 5(Table 2 p. 10, 17); 9(1, Table 1 p. 2);

15(Table 1a p. 2).

spectral characterization, Vol. 23.

see also SeaWiFS instrument.

spectral differences, see SeaWiFS instrument.

spectral irradiance, 5(13, 16, 25–27); 8(25); 14(Figs. 2–5 pp. 8–

11, Figs. 7–14 pp. 20–27, Fig. 18 p. 43); 16(Figs. 2–5 pp. 6–

9, Tables 1–5 pp. 10–23, Figs. 6–16 pp. 25–35); 19(7).

and radiance measurements, 3(2); 5(13, 16, 21–23, 25–27).

calibration geometry, 14(Fig. B3 p. 50).

see also lamps.

spectral radiance, 5(21–23, 25–27); 8(25); 14(Figs. 16–17

pp. 36–37, 45–47, Fig. A2 p. 46, 47, 52, 55–56); 19(ch. 4).

spectral reflectance, 5(37, 38); 8(27, 29–30, 35, 49); 16(2–3,

Table 20 pp. 112–113, Fig. 31 p. 114); 19(ch. 2).

BSI sphere, 16(62, Fig. 22 p. 73, Table 14 pp. 79–81).

CHORS sphere, 16(62, Figs. 23–27 pp. 74–78, Tables 15–16

pp. 82–90).

calibration, 14(Fig. A1 p. 46).

GSFC sphere, 16(36, Fig. 17 p. 45, Figs. 19–20 pp. 47–48, Tables 8–10 pp. 49–61, Fig. 21 p. 63, Tables 11–13 pp. 64–72,

118–119, Figs. C1 and C2 p. 119).

NOAA sphere, 16(81, Table 19 pp. 106–109, Fig. 30 p. 110).

UCSB sphere, 16(62, 81, Table 17 pp. 91–95, Fig. 28 p. 96).

WFF sphere, 16(81, Table 18 pp. 97–103, Fig. 29 p. 104).

see also sphere sources.

spectral response, 23(21–43).

sphere, Vol. 14.

calibration setup, 14(Fig. B5 p. 51, Fig. B9 p. 54).

integrating, 5(15); 14(28–31, 45); 16(2); 19(ch. 4); 23(13).

measurements, 14(Table B8 p. 55).

radiances, 14(Table B3 p. 49, Fig. B6 p. 51, Table B4 p. 52,

Table B6 p. 52).

source comparisons, 14(42–44).

sources, 16(23–111); 19(25, 33).

see also spectral reflectance.

SPSWG, 1(1); 3(Table 5 p. 16, 27–28).

stability tests, 14(42).

standard data format, see format, standard data.

storage:

data sets, 19(Table 19 p. 44, Figs. 19–20 pp. 44–45, Table 20

p. 48); 20(Table 1 p. 9).

stray light response, 15(Fig. 7 p. 14); 23(2, 13).

12
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

summary, see index.

sun glint, 1(18); 2(1, 10, 14); 3(6, 34); 9(2, 4–5, 6, 7, 9); 15(3,

4, 21, 27).

at equinox, 2(10).

at solstice, 2(10, 16).

flag sensitivity study, 13(ch. 9, and Plate 20).

radiance distribution, 2(Fig. 8 p. 11, Fig. 11 p. 14).

surface pressure, 8(4, 7); 13(Table 3 p. 16, Fig. 13 p. 17, 19–22,

Tables 4–6 pp. 23–24, and Plates: 6–7, and 17).

surface wind products, 19(ch. 8).

symbols:

cumulative, 6(5); 12(18–20); 18(34–37).

– T, U –

telemetry, 1(10, 14); 8(11); 9(1, 2, 7, Fig. 1 p. 8, 9); 10(1,

Figs. 20–21 pp. 23–24, 25); 15(2, 13–20, Figs. 9–10 pp. 17–

18, Tables 12–13 pp. 19–20, Table 14 p. 21).

transfer, Vol. 14.

irradiance scale, 14(Table 2 pp. 6–7, Tables 4–7 pp. 14–19,

28).

–V–

validation, 19(9–20).

algorithm, 8(16).

product, 8(10, 16).

sampling, 5(2, 31–33).

see also algorithms.

validation cont.

see also calibration.

see also calibration and validation.

viewing and solar geometries, 9(4–6); 13(3, 46).

visible radiometers, 7(1).

see also AVHRR.

see also CZCS.

see also MODIS.

see also SeaWiFS instrument.

voltmeter, 16(111–116).

tests, 14(41–42).

–W, X, Y –

wind:

see surface wind products.

see data sets, gridded wind.

–Z–

zenith, 2(10).

angles at equinox, 2(2, 16).

angles at solstice, 2(10, 16).

satellite angle, 13(15, 19, 46).

solar angle, 2(2, Fig. 3 p. 5, 10, Fig. 9 p. 12, Fig. 12 p. 15,

Table 3 p. 16, 16); 3(2, 8, 23); 7(1, 4); 9(Table 6 p. 9);

13(Table 11 p. 29, 46).

spacecraft angle, 2(2, Fig. 4 p. 6, 10, 16); 13(Table 11 p. 29).

13
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

Glossary

–A–

A/D Analog-to-Digital; also written as: AD

A&M (Texas) Agriculture and Mechanics (University)

AC Alternating Current

ACC Antarctic Circumpolar Current

ACRIM Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor

ACS Attitude Control System

ADC Analog-to-Digital Converter

ADEOS Advanced Earth Observation Satellite (Japan)

AE  ̊Angstr ̈om Exponent

ALSCAT ALPHA and Scattering Meter (Note: the symbol α corresponds to c(λ), the beam attenuation coefficient, in present usage).

AM-1 Not an acronym, used to designate the morning

platform of EOS.

AMC Angular Momentum Compensation

AOCI Airborne Ocean Color Imager

AOL Airborne Oceanographic Lidar

AOP Apparent Optical Property

AOS/LOS Acquisition of Signal/Loss of Signal

APL Applied Physics Laboratory

ARGOS Not an acronym, but the name given to the

data collection and location system on the

NOAA Operational Satellites.

ARI Accelerated Research Initiative

ASCII American Standard Code for Information Interchange

ASI Italian Space Agency

ASR Absolute Spectral Response

AT Along-Track

AU Astronomical Unit

AVHRR Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer

AVIRIS Advanced Visible and Infrared Imaging Spectrometer

AXBT Airborne Expendable Bathythermograph

–B–

BAOPW-1 First Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Protocols Workshop

BAOPW-2 Second Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Protocols Workshop

BAOPW-3 Third Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Protocols Workshop

BAOPW-4 Fourth Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Protocols Workshop

BAOPW-5 Fifth Bio-optical Algorithm and Optical Protocols Workshop

BAS British Antarctic Survey

BATS Bermuda Atlantic Time-Series Station

BBOP Bermuda Bio-Optical Profiler

BBR Band-to-Band Registration

BCRS Dutch Remote Sensing Board

BEP Benguela Ecology Programme

BER Bit Error Rate

BMFT Minister for Research and Technology (Germany)

BOFS British Ocean Flux Study

BOMS Bio-Optical Moored Systems

bpi bits per inch

BRDFBidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function

BSI Biospherical Instruments, Incorporated

BSIXR BSI’s Transfer Radiometer

BTR Bright Target Recovery

BUV Backscatter Ultraviolet Spectrometer

BWI Baltimore-Washington International (airport)

–C–

CalCoFI California Cooperative Fisheries Institute

Cal/Val Calibration and Validation

CALVAL Calibration and Validation

Case-1 Water whose reflectance is determined solely by

absorption.

Case-2 Water whose reflectance is significantly influenced by scattering.

CCD Charge Coupled Device

CCPO Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography (Old

Dominion University)

CDF(NASA) Common Data Format

CDOM Colored Dissolved Organic Material

CD-ROM Compact Disk-Read Only Memory

CDR Critial Design Review

CEC Commission of the European Communities

CENR Committee on Environment and Natural Resources

CHORS Center for Hydro-Optics and Remote Sensing

(San Diego State University)

CICESE Centro de Investigaci ́on Cient ́ifica y de Educaci ́on Superior de Ensenada (Mexico)

CIRES Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences

COADS Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set

COOP Coastal Ocean Optics Program

COTS Commercial Off-The-Shelf (software)

CPR Continuous Plankton Recorder

cpu Central Processing Unit

CRM Contrast Reduction Meter

CRN Italian Research Council

CRSEO Center for Remote Sensing and Environmental

Optics (University of California at Santa Barbara)

CRT Calibrated Radiance Tapes; or Cathode Ray

Tube.

CRTT CZCS Radiation and Temperature Tape

CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (of Australia)

CSC Computer Sciences Corporation

CSL Computer Systems Laboratory

CT Cross-Track

CTD Conductivity, Temperature, and Depth

CVT Calibration and Validation Team

CW Continuous Wave

CWR Clear Water Radiance

CZCS Coastal Zone Color Scanner

–D–

DAAC Distributed Active Archive Center

DAO Data Assimilation Office

DARR-1 First Data Analysis Round-Robin

DARR-2 Second Data Analysis Round-Robin

DAT Digital Audio Tape

DC Direct Current

DCFData Capture Facility

DCOM Dissolved Colored Organic Material

DCP Data Collection Platform

14
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

DEC Digital Equipment Corporation

DMS dimethyl sulfide

DOC Dissolved Organic Carbon

DoD Department of Defense

DOM Dissolved Organic Matter

DOS Disk Operating System

DSP Not an acronym, but an image display and analysis package developed at RSMAS University of

Miami.

DU Dobson Units

DXW Not an acronym, but a lamp designator.

–E–

E-mail Electronic Mail

EAFB Edwards Air Force Base

ECEFEarth-Centered Earth-Fixed

ECMWFEuropean Centre for Medium Range Weather

Forecasts

ECT Equator Crossing Time

EDT Eastern Daylight Time

EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone

ENSO El Ni ̃no Southern Oscillation

ENVISAT Environmental Satellite

EOFEmpirical Orthogonal Function

EOS Earth Observing System

EOSAT Earth Observation Satellite Company

EOSDIS EOS Data Information System

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

EP-TOMS Earth Probe-Total Ozone Mapping Spectroradiometer

EqPac Equatorial Pacific (Process Study)

ER-2 Earth Resources-2

ERBE Earth Radiation Budget Experiment

ERBS Earth Radiation Budget Sensor

ERL (NOAA) Environmental Research Laboratories

ERS Earth Resources Satellite

ESA European Space Agency

EST Eastern Standard Time

EURASEP European Association of Scientists in Environmental Pollution

EUVE Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer

–F–

FASCAL Fast Calibration (Facility)

FDDI Fiber Data Distribution Interface

FEL Not an acronym, but a lamp designator.

FGGE First GARP Global Experiment

FLUPAC (Geochemical) Fluxes in the Pacific (Ocean)

FNOC Fleet Numerical Oceanography Center

FORTRAN Formula Translation (computer language)

FOV Field-of-View

FPA Focal Point Assembly

FRD Federal Republic of Deutschland (Germany)

FTP File Transfer Protocol

FWHM Full-Width at Half-Maximum

FY Fiscal Year

–G–

GAC Global Area Coverage, coarse resolution satellite data with a nominal ground resolution at

nadir of approximately 4 km.

GARP Global Atmospheric Research Program

GASM General Angle Scattering Meter

GF/F Not an acronym; a specific type of glass fiber

filter manufactured by Whatman

GIN Greenland, Iceland, and Norwegian Seas

GISS Goddard Institute for Space Studies

GLI Global Imager

GLOBEC Global Ocean Ecosystems dynamics

GMT Greenwich Mean Time

GOES Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite

GOFS Global Ocean Flux Study

GOMEX Gulf of Mexico Experiment

GP Global Processing (algorithm)

GPM General Perturbations Model

GPS Global Positioning System

GRGS Groupe de Recherche de Geodesie Spatial

GRIB Gridded Binary

GRIDTOMS Gridded TOMS (data set)

GSFC Goddard Space Flight Center

GSO Graduate School of Oceanography (University

of Rhode Island)

G/T System Gain/Total System Noise Temperature

GUI Graphical User Interface

–H–

HDFHierarchical Data Format

HEI Hoffman Engineering, Incorporated

HeNe Helium-Neon

HHCRM Hand-Held Contrast Reduction Meter

HIRIS High Resolution Imaging Spectrometer

HN (Polaroid) Not an acronym; a linear sheet polarizer used to check the polarization sensitivity

of bands 7 and 8.

HOTS Hawaiian Optical Time Series

HP Hewlett Packard

HPGL Hewlett Packard Graphics Language

HPLC High Performance Liquid Chromatography

HQ Headquarters

HR (Polaroid) Not an acronym; a linear sheet polarizer used to check the polarization sensitivity

of bands 1–6.

HRPT High Resolution Picture Transmission

HST Hawaii Standard Time

HYDRA Hydrographic Data Reduction and Analysis

–I–

I/O Input/Output

IAPSO International Association for the Physical Sciences of the Ocean

IAU International Astrophysical Union

IBM International Business Machines

ICD Interface Control Document

ICES International Council on Exploration of the

Seas

IDL Interactive Data Language

IFOV Instantaneous Field-of-View

IMS Information Management System

IOP Inherent Optical Property

IP Internet Protocol

IPD Image Processing Division

IR Infrared

ISCCP International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project

ISIC Integrating Sphere Irradiance Collector

ISTP International Solar Terrestrial Program

IUCRM Inter-Union Commission on Radio Meteorology

IUE International Ultraviolet Explorer

15
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

–J–

JAM JYACC Application Manager

JARE Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition

JGOFS Joint Global Ocean Flux Study

JHU Johns Hopkins University

JOI Joint Oceanographic Institute

JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory

JRC Joint Research Center

– K, L –

L&N Leeds & Northrup

LAC Local Area Coverage, fine resolution satellite

data with a nominal ground resolution at nadir

of approximately 1 km.

LANDSAT Land Resources Satellite

LDEO Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (Columbia

University)

LDGO Lamon-Doherty Geological Observatory (Columbia University)

LDTNLR Local Dynamic Threshold Nonlinear Raleigh

Level-0 Raw data.

Level-1 Calibrated radiances.

Level-2 Derived products.

Level-3 Gridded and averaged derived products.

LMCE Laboratoire de Modelisation du climat et de

l’Environment (France)

LOC Local Time

LODYC Laboratoire d’Oc ́eanographie et de Dynamique

du climat (France)

LOICZ Land Ocean Interaction in the Coastal Zone

LPCM Laboratoire de Physique et Chimie Marines

(France)

LRER Long-Range Ecological Research

LSB Least Significant Bits

LSFLine Spread Function

–M–

MAREX Marine Resources Experiment Program

MARS Multispectral Airborne Radiometer System

MASSS Multi-Agency Ship-Scheduling for SeaWiFS

MBARI Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

MEM Maximum Entropy Method

MER Marine Environmental Radiometer

MERIS Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer

METEOSAT Meteorological Satellite

MFMajor Frame

mFMinor Frame

MIPS Millions of Instructions Per Second

MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology

MIZ Marginal Ice Zone

MLE Maximum Likelihood Estimator

MLML Moss Landing Marine Laboratory (San Jose

State University)

MO Magneto-Optical

MOBY Marine Optical Buoy

MOCE Marine Optical Characterization Experiment

MODARCH MODIS Document Archive

MODIS Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

MODIS-N Nadir-viewing MODIS instrument

MODIS-T Tilted MODIS instrument to minimize sun glint

MOS Marine Optical Spectroradiometer

MOU Memorandum of Understanding

MSB Most Significant Bits

MS/DOS MicroSoft/Disk Operating System

MTFModulation Transfer Function

–N–

NABE North Atlantic Bloom Experiment

NAS National Academy of Science

NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASCOM NASA Communications

NASDA National Space Development Agency (Japan)

NASIC NASA Aircraft/Satellite Instrument Calibration

NAVSPASUR Naval Space Surface Surveillance

NCAR National Center for Atmospheric Research

NCCOSC Navy Command, Control, and Ocean Surveillance Center

NCDC (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center

NCDS NASA Climate Data System

NCSA National Center for Supercomputing Applications

NCSU North Carolina State University

NDBC National Data Buoy Center

NDVI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index

NEdL Noise Equivalent Differential Spectral Radiance

NE∆T Noise Equivalent Delta Temperature

NEδL Noise Equivalent delta Radiance

NER Noise Equivalent Radiance

NERC Natural Environment Research Council

NESDIS National Environmental Satellite Data Information Service

NESS National Environmental Satellite Service

NET NIMBUS Experiment Team

netCDF(NASA) Network Common Data Format

NFS Network File System

NGDC National Geophysical Data Center

NIMBUS Not an acronym, but a series of NASA experimental weather satellites containing a wide variety of atmosphere, ice, and ocean sensors.

NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology

NMC National Meteorological Center

NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NOARL Naval Oceanographic and Atmospheric Research Laboratory

NODC National Oceanographic Data Center

NORAD North American Air Defense (Command)

NOPS NIMBUS Observation Processing System

NOS National Ocean Service

NRA NASA Research Announcement

NRaD Naval Research and Development

NRIFSF National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries (Japan)

NRL Naval Research Laboratory

NRT Near-Real Time

NSCAT NASA Scatterometer

NSFNational Science Foundation

NSSDC National Space Science Data Center

–O–

OAM Optically Active Materials

OCDM Ocean Color Data Mission

OCEAN Ocean Colour European Archive Network

OCS Ocean Color Scanner

OCTS Ocean Color Temperature Sensor (Japan)

16
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

ODAS Ocean Data Acquisition System

ODEX Optical Dynamics Experiment

ODU Old Dominion University

OFFI Optical Free-Fall Instrument

OI Original Irradiance

OLIPAC Oligotrophy in the Pacific (Ocean)

OMEX Ocean Marine Exchange

ONR Office of Naval Research

OPT Ozone Processing Team

OS Operating System

OSC Orbital Sciences Corporation

OSFI Optical Surface Floating Instrument

OSSA Office of Space Science and Applications

OSU Oregon State University

–P–

PAR Photosynthetically Available Radiation

PC (IBM) Personal Computer

PDR Preliminary Design Review

PDT Pacific Daylight Time

PFF Programmable Frame Formatter

PI Principal Investigator

PIKE Phased Illuminated Knife Edge

PM-1 Not an acronym, used to designate the afternoon.

PMEL Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory

PML Plymouth Marine Laboratory

POC Particulate Organic Carbon

POLDER Polarization Detecting Environmental Radiometer (France) or Polarization and Directionality of the Earth’s Reflectances (depending on

usage).

PON Particulate Organic Nitrogen

PR Photo Research

PRIME Plankton Reactivity in the Marine Environment

PST Pacific Standard Time

PSU Practical Salinity Units

PTFE Polytetrafluoroethylene

PUR Photosynthetically Usable Radiation

–Q–

QC Quality Control

QED Quantum Efficient Device

–R–

R&A Research and Applications

R&D Research and Development

R/V Research Vessel

RACER Research on Antarctic Coastal Ecosystem Rates

RDBMS Relational Database Management System

RDFRadio Direction Finder

RFRadio Frequency

RFP Request for Proposals

RISC Reduced Instruction Set Computer

rms root mean squared

ROSIS Remote Sensing Imaging Spectrometer, also

known as the Reflective Optics System Imaging

Spectrometer (Germany)

RR Round-Robin

RSMAS Rosenstiel School for Marine and Atmospheric

Sciences (University of Miami)

RSS Remote Sensing Systems (Inc.)

RTOP Research and Technology Operation Plan

–S–

S/C Spacecraft

S/N Serial Number

SAC Satellite Applications Centre

SARSAT Search and Rescue Satellite

SBRC (Hughes) Santa Barbara Research Center

SBUV Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet Radiometer

SBUV-2 Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet Radiometer–2

SCADP SeaWiFS Calibration and Acceptance Data

Package

SCOR Scientific Committee on Oceanographic Research

SDPS SeaWiFS Data Processing System

SDS Scientific Data Set

SDSU San Diego State University

SeaBASS SeaWiFS Bio-Optical Archive and Storage System

SEAPAK Not an acronym, but an image display and analysis package developed at GSFC.

SeaSCOPE SeaWiFS Study of Climate, Ocean Productivity, and Environmental Change

SeaWiFS Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor

SES Shelf Edge Study

SGI Silicon Graphics, Incorporated

SI Syst`eme International d’ Unit`es or International

System of Units

SIG Special Interest Group

SIO Scripps Institution of Oceanography

SIO/MPL Scripps Institution of Oceanography/Marine

Physical Laboratory

SIRREX SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin Experiment

SIRREX-1 The First SIRREX (July 1992)

SIRREX-2 The Second SIRREX (June 1993)

SIRREX-3 The Third SIRREX (September 1994)

SIS Spherical Integrating Source

SISSR Submerged In Situ Spectral Radiometer

SJSU San Jose State University

SMM Solar Maximum Mission

SNR Signal-to-Noise Ratio

SO Southern Ocean (algorithm)

SOC Simulation Operations Center

SOGS SeaStar Operations Ground Subsystem

SOH State of Health

SOW Statement of Work

SPM Suspended Particulate Material or Special Perturbations Model (depending on usage).

SPO SeaWiFS Project Office

SPOT Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre

(France)

SPSWG SeaWiFS Prelaunch Science Working Group

SQL Sequential Query Language

SRC Satellite Receiving Station (NERC)

SRT Sigma Research Technology, Incorporated

SSM/I Special Sensor for Microwave/Imaging

SST Sea Surface Temperature or SeaWiFS Science

Team (depending on usage).

ST Science Team

STM Science Team Member

SUN Sun Microsystems

SWAP Sylter Wattenmeer Austausch-prozesse

SWG Science Working Group

SXR SeaWiFS Transfer Radiometer

17
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

–T–

T-S Temperature-Salinity

TAE Transportable Applications Executive

TAO Thermal Array for the Ocean or more recently,

Tropical Atmosphere-Ocean

TBD To Be Determined

TBUS Not an acronym, but a NOAA orbit prediction

TDI Time-Delay and Integration

TDRSS Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System

TIROS Television Infrared Observation Satellite

TLM Telemetry

TM Technical Memorandum

TOA Top of the Atmosphere

TOGA Tropical Ocean Global Atmosphere program

TOMS Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer

TOPEX Topography Experiment

TOVS TIROS Operational Vertical Sounder

TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission

TSM Total Suspended Material

TV Thermal Vacuum

–U–

UA University of Arizona

UARS Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite

UAXR University of Arizona’s Transfer Radiometer

UCAR University Consortium for Atmospheric Research

UCMBO University of California Marine Bio-Optics

UCSB University of California at Santa Barbara

UCSD University of California at San Diego

UH University of Hawaii

UIM/X User Interface Management/X-Windows

UM University of Miami

UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific, and

Cultural Organizations

UNIX Not an acronym, a computer operating system.

UPS Uninterruptable Power System

URI University of Rhode Island

USC University of Southern California

USFUniversity of South Florida

UTM Universal Transverse Mercator (projection)

UV Ultraviolet

UVB Ultraviolet-B

UWG User Working Group

–V–

V0 Version 0

V1 Version 1

VAX Virtual Address Extension

VCS Version Control Software

VDC Volts Direct Current

VHFVery High Frequency

VI Virtual Instrument

VISLAB Visibility Laboratory (Scripps Institution of

Oceanography)

VISNIR Visible and Near Infrared

VMS Virtual Memory System

VSFVolume Scattering Function

–W–

WFF Wallops Flight Facility

WHOI Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute

WMO World Meteorological Organization

WOCE World Ocean Circulation Experiment

WORM Write-Once Read-Many (times)

WVS World Vector Shoreline

–X–

XDR External Data Representation

– Y, Z –

YBOM Yamato Bank Optical Mooring

18
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

Symbols

–A–

a The semi-major axis of the Earth’s orbit, a formulation constant, a constant equal to 0.983, a constant

equal to −20/tanh(2) or an exponential value in the

expression relating the radiance of scattered light to

wavelength (depending on usage).

a(z, λ) Spectral absorption coefficient.

a≤ Oxygen absorption coefficient.

aox Coefficient for oxygen absorption.

aoz Coefficient for ozone absorption.

awv Coefficient for water vapor absorption.

A0 Coefficient for the linear term in the scan modulation correction equation.

Ad The detector aperture.

Af The foam reflectance.

Ai The intersection area.

A(k) Absorptivity.

A(λ) Coefficient for calculating bb(λ).

–B–

b Formulation coefficient or a constant equal to 1/3

(depending on usage).

b(z, λ) Total scattering coefficient.

b(θ, z, λ0) Volume scattering coefficient.

bb(z, λ) Spectral backscattering coefficient.

bbc(λ) Spectral backscattering coefficient for phytoplankton.

br(λ) Total Raman scattering coefficient.

bw(λ) Total scattering coefficient for pure seawater.

b1(k) Input data for polarization calculations for SeaWiFS

band 1.

b7(k) Input data for polarization calculations for SeaWiFS

band 7.

B Excess target radiance.

B0 Coefficient for the power term in the scan modulation correction equation.

B(λ) Coefficient for calculating bb(λ).

–C–

c(z, λ) Spectral beam attenuation coefficient .

c(z, 660) Red beam attenuation (at 660 nm).

[chl. a]/K Concentration of chlorophyll a over K, the diffuse

attenuation coefficient.

C Chlorophyll a pigment, or just pigment concentration.

C1 Measured value for the flight diffuser on a given scan

line, in counts.

C13 Pigment concentration derived using CZCS bands 1

and 3.

C2 Measured value of the flight diffuser for the scan line

immediately sequential to the first scan line used to

measure the flight diffuser, i.e., S1, in counts.

C23 Pigment concentration derived using CZCS bands 2

and 3.

Cdark Instrument dark restore value, in counts.

Cext Average total extinction cross-section of a particle.

CF The calibration factor.

Cout Instrument output, in counts.

Cref Reference chlorophyll value (0.5).

Ctemp Temperature sensor output, in counts, represented

by an 8-bit digital word in the SeaStar telemetry.

[C + P] Pigment concentration defined as mg chlorophyll a

plus phaeopigments m−3.

–D–

d The distance between source and detector apertures.

di Distance from the ith observation point to the point

of interest.

dj Distance from the jth observation point to the point

of interest.

d(I(λ)) An increment in detector current.

dλ An increment in wavelength.

ds Detector configuration datum.

D Sequential day of the year.

D Orbit position difference vector.

Dat Along-track position difference.

Dct Cross-track position difference.

Drad Radial position difference.

DC Digital count (value) or direct current (depending

on usage).

DC10 Digital counts at 10-bit digitization.

DCmeas The digital counts measured unshadowed.

DCscat The digital counts due to scattered sunlight.

DCTOA The digital counts measured at the top of the atmosphere.

–E–

e Orbit eccentricity of the Earth.

E(λ) Spectral irradiance.

Ea(λ) Irradiance in air.

Ebeg Beginning irradiance value.

Ecal Calibration source irradiance.

Ed Incident downwelling irradiance.

Ed(0−, λ) Incident spectral irradiance.

Ed(z, λ) Downwelled spectral irradiance.

Eend Ending irradiance value.

Emeas(λ) Measured radiance.

Eref (λ) Reference radiance.

Es(λ) Surface irradiance.

Erem Percentage of energy removed from a wavelength

band.

Esky(λ) Spectral sky irradiance distribution.

Esun(z, λ) Spectral sun irradiance distribution.

Eu(z, λ) Upwelled spectral irradiance.

Ew(z, λ) Irradiance in water.

–F–

f The fraction of the surface covered by foam.

fi Filter number, i=0–11.

f-ratio The ratio of new to total production.

F ̄ Arithmetic average.

F(λ) A mean conversion factor.

F(λ) Calibration factor.

F(λ) A conversion factor to convert PR714 readings to

the GSFC sphere radiance scale.

F  ̄(λ) Average of calibration factors.

F0 Extraterrestrial irradiance corrected for Earth-sun

distance.

F0 The scalar value of the solar spectral irradiance at

the top of the atmosphere, multiplied by a columnar

matrix of the four Stokes parameters (1/2, 1/2, 0,

0).

F0 Mean solar irradiance.

F

0 Extraterrestrial irradiance corrected for the atmosphere.

F0(λ) Mean extraterrestrial spectral irradiance.

F0(λ) Mean extraterrestrial irradiance.

19
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

Fa Forward scattering probability of the aerosol.

Fd The total flux incident on the surface if it did not

reflect light.

F

d The total flux incident on the surface, corrected for

surface reflection.

F

d The scalar value of the total flux incident on the

surface, corrected for surface reflection, multiplied

by a columnar matrix of the four Stokes parameters.

Fi A correction factor.

–G–

g1 A constant equal to 0.82.

g2 A constant equal to −0.55.

gs Gain selection datum.

G Gain factor.

G1 Gain setting 1.

G2 Gain setting 2.

G3 Gain setting 3.

G4 Gain setting 4.

G(λ) R`a(λi)/R`a(670) = (670/λ)

γ T2r(670)/T2r(λi).

Ge Gravitational constant of the Earth (398,600.5 km3

s−2).

Gn Gain factor at gain setting n.

–H–

h(k) Residual values without the calculated sinusoidal response.

HGMT GMT in hours.

HM The measured moon irradiance.

Hs Altitude of the spacecraft (for SeaStar 705 km).

–I–

i Inclination angle or interval index (depending on

usage).

i

 Inclination angle minus 90◦.

I Rayleigh intensity.

I0 Surface downwelling irradiance.

I1 Radiant intensity after traversing through an absorbing medium.

I2 Reflected radiant energy received by the satellite

sensor.

Imax Recorded maximum instrument output in response

to linearly polarized light.

Imin Recorded minimum instrument output in response

to linearly polarized light.

I(λ) Detector current.

ICS Current from the current source diode.

–J–

j Interval index.

J2 The J2 gravity field term (0.0010863).

J3 The J3 gravity field term (−0.0000254).

J4 The J4 gravity field term (−0.0000161).

J5 The J5 gravity field term.

–K–

k Wavenumber of light (1/λ).

k1 Beginning wavenumber.

k2 Ending wavenumber.

kc(λ) Spectral fit coefficient weighted over the SeaWiFS

bands; k

c(λ) also used.

K(z, λ) Diffuse attenuation coefficient.

K(490) Diffuse attenuation coefficient of seawater measured

at 490 nm.

K0(λ) Diffuse attenuation coefficient at z = 0.

K1 Primary instrument sensitivity factor.

K2 Gain factor.

K3 Temperature dependence of detector output.

K4 Scan modulation correction factor.

K5 Spacecraft analog to digital conversion factor.

K6 Analog-to-digital offset in spacecraft conversion.

K7 Current from the diode at 20◦C.

Kc(λ) Attenuation coefficients for phytoplankton.

KE(λ) Attenuation coefficient downwelled irradiance.

Kg(λ) Attenuation coefficients for Gelbstoff.

KL(z, λ) Attenuation coefficient upwelled radiance.

Kw(λ) Attenuation coefficients for pure seawater.

–L–

L(λ) Spectral radiance.

L(λm) The radiance of a calibration sphere at the nominal

peak wavelength of a filter.

L(z, θ, φ) Submerged upwelled radiance distribution.

L0 The radiance of the atmosphere.

La Aerosol radiance.

Lc(λ) Cloud radiance threshold.

Lcal Calibration source radiance.

Ld A matrix of the four Stokes parameters for radiance

incident on the surface.

Lcloud Maximum radiance from reflected light off of clouds.

Lg(λ) Sun glint radiance.

Li(λ) Spectral radiance for run number i, or radiance,

where i may represent any of the following: m for

measured; LU for look-up table; 0 for light scattered by the atmosphere; sfc for reflection from the

sea surface; and w for water-leaving radiance.

LLU The radiance calculated for the look-up tables.

Lm The radiance of the ocean-atmosphere system measured at a satellite.

LM The radiance of the moon.

Lmax Maximum saturation radiance.

Lnadir Measured radiance at nadir.

LNERλ) Noise equivalent radiance.

Lr(λ) Rayleigh radiance.

Lr0(λ) Rayleigh radiance at standard atmospheric pressure,

P0.

Ls(λ) Subsurface water radiance.

Lsa L0 + Lsfc.

Lsat(λ) Saturation radiance for the sensor.

Lscan Measured radiance at any pixel in a scan.

Lsfc The radiance of the light reflected from the sea surface.

Lsfc The columnar matrix of the four Stokes parameters

(Lu,1, Lu,2, Lu,3, Lu,4).

Lsky(λ) Spectral sky radiance distribution.

Lt(λ) Total radiance at the sensor.

Ltypical Expected radiance from the ocean measured on orbit.

Lu(z, λ) Upwelled spectral radiance.

Lup The columnar matrix of light leaving the surface

containing the values Lup,1, Lup,2, Lup,3, and Lup,4.

Lup,i The RADTRAN radiance parameters (for i = 1, 4).

LW The water-leaving radiance of light scattered from

beneath the surface and penetrating it.

LW (443) Water-leaving radiance at 443 nm.

20
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

LW (520) Water-leaving radiance at 520 nm.

LW (550) Water-leaving radiance at 550 nm.

LW (670) Water-leaving radiance at 670 nm.

Lw The scalar value of the water-leaving radiance multiplied by a columnar matrix of the four Stokes parameters.

LWN (λ) Normalized water-leaving radiance.

LS1 Measured radiance for mirror side 1.

LS2 Measured radiance for mirror side 2.

–M–

m Index of refraction.

M Path length through the atmosphere.

M

m The corrected mean orbit anomaly of the Earth,

which is a function of date, and refers to an imaginary moon in a circular orbit.

Moz Path length for ozone transmittance.

–N–

n The index of refraction, the mean orbital motion in

revolutions per day, or the gain setting (depending

on usage).

n(λ) An exponent conceptually similar to the  ̊Angstr ̈om

exponent.

nw(λ) Index of refraction of water.

N The total number of something.

ND The compensation factor for a 4 log neutral density

filter.

N Total number density.

Ni Total number density of either the first or second

aerosol model when i = 1 or 2, respectively.

–O–

O P × V .

–P–

pa A factor to account for the probability of scattering

to the spacecraft for three different paths from the

sun.

pa/(4π) Aerosol albedo of the scattering phase function.

pw The probability of seeing sun glitter in the direction

θ, Φ given the sun in position θ0, Φ0 as a function of

wind speed (W).

P Nodal period, phaeopigment concentration or local

surface pressure (depending on usage).

P Orbit position vector.

P(θ+) Phase function for forward scattering.

P(θ−) Phase function for backward scattering.

P0 Standard atmospheric pressure (1,013.25 mb).

Pa Probability of scattering to the spacecraft.

Pi PR714 raw radiance.

Pσ Phaeopigment concentration.

P F Polarization factor.

Pxl Pixel number, i.e., the numerical designation of a

pixel in a scan line.

–Q–

q Water transmittance factor.

Q(λ) Lu(0−, λ) to Eu(0−, λ) relation factor (theoretically

equal to π).

–R–

r Water-air reflectance for totally diffuse irradiance.

r1 The radius of circle one or source aperture (depending on usage).

r2 The radius of circle two or detector aperture (depending on usage).

ri The geometric mean radii of either the first or second aerosol model when i = 1 or 2, respectively.

R Reflectance.

R The reflection matrix.

R2 The square of the linear correlation coefficient.

R(0−, λ) Irradiance reflectance just below the sea surface.

R1 Multiplier for mirror side 1.

R2 Multiplier for mirror side 2.

Ra Aerosol reflectance.

R`a Ra/(qT2r).

Re Mean Earth radius (6,378.137 km).

RE Effective resistance for the thermistor-resistor pair.

RL(z, λ) Spectral reflectance.

Rr Rayleigh reflectance.

Rrs Remote sensing reflectance.

Rs Subsurface reflectance.

Rt Total reflectance at the sensor.

R`t (Rt − Rr)/(qT2r).

RT Resistance of the thermistor.

Rz Sunspot number.

–S–

s The reflectance of the atmosphere for isotropic radiance incident at its base.

s(λ) Slope for the range 0–1,023.

S Solar constant.

Si Initial detector signal.

Sn Detector signal with gain.

S(λ) La(λ)/La(670).

– T, U –

t Time variable or the transmission of Lsfc through

the atmosphere (depending on usage).

t

 The transmission of LW through the atmosphere.

t(k) Spectral transmission as a function of wavenumber.

t(λ) Diffuse transmittance of the atmosphere.

t0 The sum of the direct and diffuse transmission of

sunlight through the atmosphere.

t1 First observation time.

t2 Second observation time.

t0 Initial time.

taa Aerosol transmittance after absorption.

tas Aerosol transmittance after scattering.

td Direct component of transmittance after absorption

by the gaseous components of the atmosphere, scattering and absorption by aerosols, and scattering by

Rayleigh.

te Time difference in hours between present position

and most recent equator crossing.

tEC Equator crossing time.

toz Transmittance after absorption by ozone.

tr Transmittance after Rayleigh scattering.

ts Diffuse component of transmittance after absorption by the gaseous components of the atmosphere,

scattering and absorption by aerosols, and scattering by Rayleigh.

twv Transmittance after absorption by water vapor.

21
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

T Tilt position.

T(λ) The transmittance along the slant path to the sun.

Ts(λ) Transmittance through the surface.

T(λ, θ) Total transmittance (direct plus diffuse) from the

ocean through the atmosphere to the spacecraft

along the path determined by the spacecraft zenith

angle θ.

T2r Two-way diffuse transmittance for Rayleigh attenuation.

T0(λ, θ0) Total downward transmittance of irradiance.

Te Equation of time.

Tox Transmittance of oxygen (O2).

Toz Transmittance of ozone (O3).

Ts(λ) Transmittance through the surface.

Tw(λ) Transmittance through a water path.

Twv Transmittance of water vapor (H2O).

–V–

V Orbit velocity vector.

Vi(tj ) The ith spatial location at observation time tj .

VM The radiance detector voltage while viewing the

moon.

VS The irradiance detector voltage while viewing the

sun.

VT Focal plane temperature sensor voltage output.

–W–

W Wind speed.

Wd Direct irradiance divided by the total irradiance at

the surface.

Ws Diffuse irradiance divided by the total irradiance.

–X–

x Abscissa or longitudinal coordinate, or the pixel

number within a scan line (depending on usage).

X ECEF x component of orbit position.

X ̇ ECEF X component of orbit velocity.

–Y–

y Ordinate or meridional coordinate.

Y ECEF y component of orbit position.

Y ̇ ECEF Y component of orbit velocity.

–Z–

Z ECEF z component of orbit position.

Z ̇ ECEF Z component of orbit velocity.

– Greek –

α Percent albedo, tilt angle, formulation coefficient

(intercept), the power constant in the  ̊Angstr ̈om formulation, or the exponential value in the expression

relating the extinction coefficient to wavelength (depending on usage).

β A formulation coefficent (slope) or a constant in the

 ̊Angstr ̈om formulation (depending on usage).

βi The extinction coefficient of either the first or second aerosol model when i = 1 or 2, respectively.

β(z, λ, θ) Spectral volume scattering function.

γ The  ̊Angstr ̈om exponent.

γ(λ) The ratio of the aerosol optical thickness at wavelength λ to the aerosol optical thickness at 670 nm.

δ The great circle distance from Ψs(t0) to Ψs(t − t0),

the departure of each individual conversion factor

from the mean, a relative difference, or the absorption coefficient (depending on usage).

∆k Equivalent bandwidth.

∆LW (670) The error in the water-leaving radiance for the red

channel.

∆pCO2 Partial pressure difference of CO2 between air and

sea water.

∆P The difference in successive pixels or the pressure

deviation from standard pressure, P0 (depending on

usage).

∆t Time difference.

∆T(λ) The error in transmittance.

∆θs The error (in radians) in the knowledge of θs.

∆λ An interval in wavelength.

∆ρw(λ) The error in the water-leaving reflectance for the

red channel.

∆σ(λ) The absolute error in spectral optical depth.

∆τa The error in the aerosol optical thickness.

∆ω The longitude difference from the sub-satellite point

to the pixel.

∆ωs Longitude difference.

η Bearing from the sub-satellite point to the pixel

along the direction of motion of the satellite.

θ Spacecraft zenith angle, spacecraft pitch, or polar

angle of the line-of-sight at a spacecraft (depending

on usage).

 ̇

θ Pitch rate.

θ0 Polar angle of the direct sunlight.

θ1 The intersection angle of circle one.

θ2 The intersection angle of circle two.

θ0 Solar zenith angle.

θn The zenith angle of the vector normal to the surface

vector for which glint will be observed.

θN The angle with respect to nadir that the sea surface

slopes to produce a reflection angle to the spacecraft.

θs Scan angle of sensor or the solar zenith angle (depending on usage).

θ

s Scan angle of sensor adjusted for tilt.

κ An integration constant: κ = Adπr2

1(r21+r22+d2)

−1.

λ Wavelength of light.

λ1 Starting wavelength.

λ2 Ending wavelength.

λm Nominal center wavelength.

μ Mean value or cosine of the satellite zenith angle

(depending on usage).

μ0 Cosine of the solar zenith angle.

μd(0+, λ) Spectral mean cosine for downwelling radiance at

the sea surface.

μs The reciprocal of the effective optical length to the

top of the atmosphere, along the line of sight to the

sun.

νj The jth temporal weighting factor.

ξEM The distance between the Earth and the moon.

22
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

ρ The Fresnel reflectivity, the weighted direct plus diffuse reflectance, or the average reflectance of the sea

(depending on usage).

ρ(θ) Fresnel reflectance for viewing geometry.

ρ(θ0) Fresnel reflectance for solar geometry.

ρc,i Reflectance of clouds and ice.

ρn Sea surface reflectance for direct irradiance at normal incidence for a flat sea.

ρi The reflectance of the sea of either the first or second

aerosol model when i = 1 or 2, respectively.

ρi(λ) The reflectance where i may represent any of the

following: m for measured; LU for look-up table; o

for light scattered by the atmosphere; sfc for reflection from the sea surface; and w for water-leaving

radiance.

ρN Reflectance for diffuse irradiance.

σ One standard deviation of a set of data values.

σ2 The mean square surface slope distribution.

σ(λ) The spectral optical depth.

σ2

i σ2i = (log r − log ri)

2.

τ (z, λ) Spectral optical depth.

τa Aerosol optical thickness.

τox Oxygen optical thickness at 750 nm.

τoz The optical thickness of ozone.

τr Rayleigh optical thickness (due to scattering by the

standard molecular atmosphere).

τ 

r Pressure corrected Rayleigh optical thickness.

τr0 Rayleigh optical thickness at standard atmospheric

pressure, P0.

τro Rayleigh optical thickness weighted by the SeaWiFS

spectral response.

τs(λ) Spectral solar atmospheric transmission.

τwv The absorption optical thickness of water vapor.

φ Azimuth angle of the line-of-sight at a spacecraft.

φ0 Azimuth angle of the direct sunlight.

Φ Spacecraft azimuth angle or roll (depending on usage).

Φ Roll rate.  ̇

ΦD The detector solid angle.

ΦM The solid angle subtended by the moon at the measuring instrument.

Φ0 Solar azimuth angle.

Ψ Pixel latitude or yaw (depending on usage).

Ψ Yaw rate.  ̇

Ψd Solar declination latitude.

Ψs(t) Sub-satellite latitude as a function of time.

ω Longitude variable or the surface reflection angle

(depending on usage).

ω0 Old longitude value.

ωa Single scattering albedo of the aerosol.

ωe Equator crossing longitude.

ωi Spatial weighting factor.

ωs Longitude variable.

Ω Solar hour angle or the amount of ozone in Dobson

units (depending on usage).

23
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

References

–A–

Abbott, M.R., and P.M. Zion, 1985: Satellite observations of

phytoplankton variability during an upwelling event. Cont.

Shelf Res., 4, 661–680.

, and D.B. Chelton, 1991: Advances in passive remote sensing of the ocean. U. S. National Report to the International

Union of Geodesy and Geophysics 1987–1990, Contributions in Oceanography, Am. Geophys. Union, Washington,

DC, 571–589.

Abel, P., G.R. Smith, R.H. Levin, and H. Jacobowitz, 1988: Results from aircraft measurements over White Sands, New

Mexico, to calibrate the visible channels of spacecraft instruments. SPIE, 924, 208–214.

, B. Guenther, R. Galimore, and J. Cooper, 1993: Calibration results for NOAA-11 AVHRR channels 1 and 2 from

congruent aircraft observations. J. Atmos. and Ocean.

Technol., 10, 493–508.

Ahmad, Z., and R.S. Fraser, 1982: An iterative radiative transfer code for ocean-atmosphere systems. J. Atmos. Sci., 39,

656–665.

Allen, C.W., 1973: Astrophysical Quantities, 3rd Edition. Athalone Press London, 310 pp.

Andersen J.H., 1991: CZCS level-2 generation. OCEAN Technical Series, Nos. 1–8, Ocean Colour European Archive

Network, 49 pp.

Anderson, R.F., 1992: Southern Ocean processes study. U.S.

JGOFS Planning Report Number 16, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 114 pp.

Andr ́e, J.-M. and A. Morel, 1989: Simulated effects of barometric pressure and ozone content upon the estimate of

marine phytoplankton from space. J. Geophys. Res., 94,

1,029–1,037.

, and , 1991: Atmospheric corrections and interpretation of marine radiances in CZCS imagery, revisited.

Oceanol. Acta, 14, 3–22.

 ̊Angstr ̈om , A., 1964: The parameters of atmospheric turbidity.

Tellus, 16, 64–75.

Arking, A., and J.D. Childs, 1985: Retrieval of cloud cover

parameters from multispectral satellite images. J. Climate

Appl. Meteor., 24, 322–333.

Austin, R.W., 1974: The remote sensing of spectral radiance

from below the ocean surface. Optical Aspects of Oceanography, N.G. Jerlov and E. Steemann-Nielsen, Eds., Academic Press, 317–344.

, 1976: Air-Water Radiance Calibration Factor. Tech.

Memo. ML–76–004t, Vis. Lab., Scripps Inst. of Oceanogr.,

La Jolla, California, 8 pp.

, 1980: Gulf of Mexico, ocean-color surface-truth measurements. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 18, 269–285.

, 1993: Optical remote sensing of the oceans: BC (Before

CZCS) and AC (After CZCS). Ocean Colour: Theory and

Applications in a Decade of CZCS Experience, V. Barale

and P. Schlittenhardt, Eds., ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels

and Luxembourg, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell,

Massachusetts, 1–15.

, and T.J. Petzold, 1975: An instrument for the measurement of spectral attenuation coefficient and narrow-angle

volume scattering function of ocean waters. Visibility Laboratory of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Report,

SIO Ref. 75–25, 12 pp.

, and G. Halikas, 1976: The index of refraction of seawater.

SIO Ref. 76–1, Vis. Lab., Scripps Inst. of Oceanogr., La

Jolla, California, 64 pp.

, and T.J. Petzold, 1981: The determination of diffuse attenuation coefficient of sea water using the Coastal Zone

Color Scanner. Oceanography from Space, J.F.R. Gower,

Ed., Plenum Press, 239–256.

, and B.L. McGlamery, 1983: Passive remote sensing of

ocean optical propagation parameters. 32nd Symp.,

AGARD Electromagnetic Wave Propagation Panel on

Propagation Factors Affecting Remote Sensing by Radio

Waves, Oberammergau, Germany, 45-1–45-10.

–B–

Baker, K.S., and R.C. Smith, 1982: Bio-optical classification

and model of natural waters, 2. Limnol. Oceanogr., 27,

500–509.

, and , 1990: Irradiance transmittance through the

air/water interface. Ocean Optics X, R.W. Spinrad, Ed.,

SPIE, 1302, 556–565.

Balch, W.M., 1993: Reply. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 16,585-16,587.

, R. Evans, J. Brown, G. Feldman, C. McClain, and W.

Esaias, 1992: The remote sensing of ocean primary productivity–use of a new data compilation to test satellite algorithms. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 2,279–2,293.

Ball Aerospace Systems Division, 1979: Development of the

Coastal Zone Color Scanner for Nimbus-7, Test and Performance Data. Final Report F78-11, Rev. A, Vol. 2, Boulder, Colorado, 94 pp.

Barale, V., C.R. McClain, and P. Malanotte-Rizzoli, 1986:

Space and time variability of the surface color field in the

northern Adriatic Sea. J. Geophys. Res., 91, 12,957–

12,974.

, and R. Wittenburg-Fay, 1986: Variability of the ocean

surface color field in central California near-coastal waters

as observed in seasonal analysis of CZCS imagery. J. Mar.

Res., 44, 291–316.

, and P. Schlittenhardt, 1993: Ocean Colour: Theory and

Applications in a Decade of CZCS Experience, ECSC, EEC,

EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, 367 pp.

Barnes, R.A., and A.W. Holmes, 1993: Overview of the SeaWiFS Ocean Sensor. Proc. SPIE, 1,939, 224–232.

, W.L. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, and C.L. McClain, 1994a:

Prelaunch Acceptance Report for the SeaWiFS Radiometer. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 22, S.B. Hooker, E.R. Firestone, and J.G. Acker, Eds., NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 32 pp.

24
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

, A.W. Holmes, W.L. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, and C.R. McClain, 1994b: The SeaWiFS Prelaunch Radiometeric Calibration and Spectral Characterization. NASA Tech. Memo.

104566, Vol. 23, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 55 pp.

Berger, W.H., 1989: Productivity of the Ocean: Present and

Past. V.S. Smetacek and G. Wefer, Eds., John Wiley &

Sons, 471 pp.

Berk, A., L.S. Bernstein, and D.C. Robertson, 1989: MODTRAN: A moderate resolution model for LOWTRAN 7.

GL-TR-89-0122, Geophysics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, 38 pp.

Bernstein, R.L., 1982: Sea surface temperature estimation using the NOAA-6 satellite Advanced Very High Resolution

Radiometer. J. Geophys. Res., 87, 9,455–9,465.

Biggar, S.F., D.I. Gellman, and P.N. Slater, 1990: Improved

evaluation of optical depth components from Langley plot

data. Remote Sens. Environ., 32, 91–101.

, P.N. Slater, K.J. Thome, A.W. Holmes, and R.A. Barnes,

1993: Preflight solar-based calibration of SeaWiFS. Proc.

SPIE, Vol. 1,939, 233–242.

Bird, R.E., and C. Riordan, 1986: Simple solar spectral model

for direct and diffuse irradiance on horizontal and tilted

planes at the Earth’s surface for cloudless atmospheres. J.

of Climate and Appl. Meteor., 25, 87–97.

Booth, C.R.B. and R.C. Smith, 1988: Moorable spectroradiometer in the Biowatt Experiment. Ocean Optics IX,

SPIE 925, 176–188.

Bowman, K.P., and A.J. Krueger, 1985: A global climatology

of total ozone from the Nimbus 7 Total Ozone Mapping

Spectrometer. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 7,967–7,976.

Boyd, R.A., 1951: The development of prismatic glass block

and the daylight laboratory. Eng. Res. Bull. No. 32, Eng.

Res. Inst., Univ. of Mich., Ann Arbor, Michigan, 88 pp.

Bricaud, A., A. Morel, and L. Prieur, 1981: Absorption by

dissolved organic matter of the sea (yellow substance) in

the UV and visible domains. Limnol. Oceanogr., 26, 43–

53.

, and , 1987: Atmospheric corrections and interpretation of marine radiances in CZCS imagery: use of a reflectance model. Oceanol. Acta, 7, 33–50.

Brock, J.C., C.R. McClain, M.E. Luther, and W.W. Hay, 1991:

The phytoplankton bloom in the northwest Arabian Sea

during the southwest monsoon of 1979. J. Geophys. Res.,

96, 20,623–20,642.

, and , 1992: Interannual variability in phytoplankton

blooms observed in the northwestern Arabian Sea during

the southwest monsoon. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 733–750.

Brouwer, D., 1959: Solution of the problem of artificial satellite

theory without drag. Astron. J., 64(1274), 378–397.

Brown, C.W., and J.A. Yoder, 1994: Coccolithophorid blooms

in the global ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 99(C4), 7,467–

7,482.

Brown, O.B., and R.H. Evans, 1985: Calibration of Advanced

Very High Resolution Radiometer infrared observations. J.

Geophys. Res., 90, 11,667–11,677.

Bruegge, C.J., V.G. Duval, N.L. Chrien, and D.J. Diner, 1993:

Calibration plans for the Multi-angle Imaging Spectroradiometer (MISR). Metrologia, 30(4), 213–221.

Bruening, R.J., 1987: Spectral irradiance scales based on filtered absolute silicon photodetectors. Appl. Opt., 26,

1,051–1,057.

Burlov-Vasiljev, K.A., E.A. Gurtovenko, and Y.B. Matvejev,

1992: The Solar Radiation Between 310–680 nm. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Solar Electromagnetic Radiation Study for Solar Cycle 22, R.E. Donnelly, Ed., U.S.

DOC NOAA Environmental Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, 49–53.

–C–

Campbell, J.W., and J.E. O’Reilly, 1988: Role of satellites in

estimating primary productivity on the northwest Atlantic

continental shelf. Cont. Shelf Res., 8, 179–204.

Capellari, J.O., C.E. Velez, and A.J. Fuchs, 1976: Mathematical Theory of the Goddard Trajectory Determination System. GSFC X-582-76-77, NASA Goddard Space Flight

Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 596 pp.

Caraux, D., and R.W. Austin, 1983: Delineation of Seasonal

Changes of Chlorophyll Frontal Boundaries in Mediterranean Coastal Waters with NIMBUS-7 Coastal Zone Color

Scanner Data. Rem. Sens. Environ., 13, 239–249.

Carder, K.L., G.R. Harvey, R.G. Steward, and P.B. Ortner,

1989: Marine humic and fulvic acids: their effects on remote sensing of ocean chlorophyll. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34,

68–81.

, W.W. Gregg, D.K. Costello, K. Haddad, and J.M. Prospero, 1991: Determination of Saharan dust radiance and

chlorophyll a from CZCS imagery. J. Geophys. Res., 96,

5,369–5,378.

, P. Reinersman, R.F. Chen, F. M ̈uller-Karger, C.O. Davis,

and M. Hamilton, 1993a: AVIRIS calibration and application in coastal oceanic environments. Remote Sens. Environ., 44, 205–216.

, R.G. Steward, R.F. Chen, S. Hawes, Z. Lee, and C.O.

Davis, 1993b: AVIRIS calibration and application in coastal oceanic environments: Tracers of soluble and particulate constituents of the Tampa Bay coastal plume. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens, 59(3), 339–344.

Cardone, V.J., J.G. Greenwood, and M.A. Cane, 1990: On

trends in historical marine wind data. J. Climate, 3, 113–

127.

Cebula, R.P., H. Park, and D.F. Heath, 1988: Characterization

of the Nimbus-7 SBUV radiometer for the long term monitoring of stratospheric ozone. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol.,

5, 215–227.

Chamberlin, W.S., C.R. Booth, D.A. Kiefer, J.H. Morrow, and

R.C. Murphy, 1989: Evidence for a simple relationship

between natural fluorescence, photosynthesis, and chlorophyll a in the sea. Deep Sea Res., 37, 951–973.

Chelton, D.B., and M.G. Schlax, 1991: Estimation of time averages from irregularly spaced observations: With application to coastal zone color scanner estimates of chlorophyll a

concentrations. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 14,669–14,692.

25
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

Chin, R.T., C. Jau, and J.A. Weinman, 1987: The application

of time series models to cloud field morphology analysis.

J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 26, 363–373.

Clark, D.K., 1981: Phytoplankton pigment algorithms for the

Nimbus-7 CZCS. Oceanography from Space, J.F.R. Gower,

Ed., Plenum Press, 227–238.

, E.T. Baker, and A.E. Strong, 1980: Upwelled spectral

radiance distributions in relation to particulate matter in

sea water. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 18, 287-298.

Coakley, J.A., Jr., and F.P. Bretherton, 1982: Cloud cover from

high resolution scanner data: Detecting and allowing for

partially filled fields of view. J. Geophys. Res., 87, 4,917–

4,932.

Comiso, J.C., N.G. Maynard, W.O. Smith, Jr., and C.W. Sullivan, 1990: Satellite ocean color studies of Antarctic ice

edges in summer and autumn. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 9,481–

9,496.

, C.R. McClain, C.W. Sullivan, J.P. Ryan, and C.L. Leonard, 1993: Coastal zone color scanner pigment concentrations in the Southern Ocean and relationships to geophysical surface features. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 2,419–2,451.

Corredera, P., A. Corr ́ons, A. Pons, and J. Campos, 1990: Absolute spectral Irradiance scale in the 700–2400 nm spectral

range. Appl. Opt., 29, 3,530–3,534.

Cox, C., and W. Munk, 1954a: Measurement of the roughness

of the sea surface from photographs of the sun’s glitter. J.

Opt. Soc. Am., 44, 838–850.

, and , 1954b: Statistics of the sea surface derived from

sun glitter. J. Mar. Res., 13, 198–277.

, and , 1955: Some Problems in Optical Oceanography.

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, LaJolla, California,

63–77.

Crane, R.J., and M.R. Anderson, 1984: Satellite discrimination

of snow/cloud surfaces. Int. J. Remote Sens., 5, 213–223.

Curran, R.J., 1972: Ocean color determination through a scattering atmosphere. Appl. Opt., 11, 1,857–1,866.

, H.L. Kyle, L.R. Blaine, J. Smith, and T.D. Clem, 1981:

Multichannel scanning radiometer for remote sensing cloud

physical parameters. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 52, 1,546–1,555.

–D–

Darzi, M., 1992: Cloud Screening for Polar Orbiting Visible

and IR Satellite Sensors. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol.

7, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 7 pp.

, J. Chen, J. Firestone, and C.R. McClain, 1989: SEAPAK: A satellite image analysis system for oceanographic

research. Proc. FifthIntl. Conf. Interactive Information

Processing Systems for Meteorol., Oceanogr., and Hydrol.,

Am. Meteorol. Soc., Atlanta, Georgia, 26–32.

Dave, J.V., 1972a: Development of programs for computing

characteristics of ultraviolet radiation. Technical Report—

Vector Case, Program IV, FSC-72-0013, IBM Federal Systems Division, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 138 pp.

, 1972b: Development of programs for computing characteristics of ultraviolet radiation. Technical Report—Scalar

Case, Program II, FSC-72-0011, IBM Federal Systems Division, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 38 pp.

Denman, K.L., and M.R. Abbott, 1988: Time evolution of surface chlorophyll patterns from cross spectrum analysis of

satellite color images. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 6,789–6,798.

Detwiler, A., 1990: Analysis of cloud imagery using box counting. Int. J. Remote Sens., 11, 887–898.

Deuser, W.G., F.E. Muller-Karger, and C. Hemleben, 1988:

Temporal variations of particle fluxes in the deep subtropical and tropical North Atlantic: Eulerian versus Lagrangian effects. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 6,857–6,862.

, , R.H. Evans, O.B. Brown, W.E. Esaias, and G.C.

Feldman, 1990: Surface-ocean color and deep-sea carbon

flux: how close a connection? Deep-Sea Res., 37, 1,331–

1,343.

Dickey, T., J. Marra, T. Granata, C. Langdon, M. Hamilton, J.

Wiggert, D. Siegel, and A. Bratkovich, 1991: Concurrent

high-resolution bio-optical and physical time series observations in the Sargasso Sea during the spring of 1987. J.

Geophys. Res., 96, 8,643–8,663.

Duffett-Smith, P., 1979: Practical Astronomy WithYour Calculator. Cambridge University Press, 129 pp.

–E–

Ebert, E.E., 1992: Pattern recognition analysis of polar clouds

during summer and winter. Int. J. Remote Sens., 13, 97–

109.

Eck, T.F., and V.L. Kalb, 1991: Cloud-screening for Africa using a geographically and seasonally variable infrared

threshold. Int. J. Remote Sens., 12, 1,205–1,221.

Eckstein, B.A., and J.J. Simpson, 1991: Cloud screening Coastal Zone Color Scanner images using channel 5. Int. J.

Remote Sens., 12, 2,359–2,377.

England, C.F., and G.E. Hunt, 1985: A bispectral method

for the automatic determination of parameters for use in

imaging satellite cloud retrievals. Int. J. Remote Sens., 6,

1,545–1,553.

Eppley, R.W., 1984: Relations between primary productivity

and ocean chlorophyll determined by satellites. Global

Ocean Flux Study: Proceedings of a Workshop, National

Academy Press, Washington, DC, 85–102.

Esaias, W., G. Feldman, C.R. McClain, and J. Elrod, 1986:

Satellite observations of oceanic primary productivity. Eos,

Trans. AGU, 67, 835–837.

Evans, R.H., and H.R. Gordon, 1994: CZCS “system calibration:” A retrospective examination. J. Geophys. Res., 99,

7,293–7,307.

–F–

Feldman, G., 1986: Variability of the productive habitat in the

eastern equatorial Pacific. Eos, Trans. AGU, 67, 106–108.

, D. Clark, and D. Halpern, 1984: Satellite color observations of the phytoplankton distribution in the eastern

equatorial Pacific during the 1982–1983 El Ni ̃no. Science,

226, 1,069–1,071.

26
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

, N. Kuring, C. Ng, W. Esaias, C. McClain, J. Elrod, N.

Maynard, D. Endres, R. Evans, J. Brown, S. Walsh, M.

Carle, and G. Podesta, 1989: Ocean Color: Availability of

the global data set. Eos, Trans. AGU, 70, 634.

Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker 1992: SeaWiFS Technical

Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–5. NASA

Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 6, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 9 pp.

, and S.B. Hooker 1993: SeaWiFS Technical Report Series

Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–11. NASA Tech. Memo.

104566, Vol. 12, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 28 pp.

, and S.B. Hooker 1995: SeaWiFS Technical Report Series

Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–17. NASA Tech. Memo.

104566, Vol. 18, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 47 pp.

Firestone, J.K., G. Fu, M. Darzi, and C.R. McClain, 1990:

NASA’s SEAPAK software for oceanographic data analysis: An update. Proc. SixthInt. Conf. Interactive Information Processing Systems for Meteor., Oceanogr., and

Hydrol., Am. Meteor. Soc., Anaheim, California, 260–267.

, and B.D. Scheiber, 1994: “The Generation of Ancillary Data Climatologies.” In: McClain, C.R., K.R. Arrigo, J. Comiso, R. Fraser, M. Darzi, J.K. Firestone, B.

Schieber, E-n. Yeh, and C.W. Sullivan, 1994: Case Studies

for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 1. NASA

Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 13, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 35–42.

Flierl, G., D. Glover, J. Bishop, and S. Paranjpe, 1993: The

JGOFS Distributed Object Oriented Data System User

Guide. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,

Massachusetts, 90 pp.

Flittner, D.E., and P.N. Slater, 1991: Stability of narrow-band

filter radiometers in the solar-reflective range. Photogramm.

Eng. Remote Sens., 57, 165–171.

Fofonoff, N.P., and R.C. Millard, Jr., 1983: Algorithms for

Computation of Fundamental Properties of Seawater. UNESCO Tech. Papers in Mar. Sci., 44, UNESCO, 53 pp.

Fraser, R.S., 1993: Optical thickness of atmospheric dust over

Tadjhikistan. Atmos. Envir., 27A, 2,533–2,538.

, R.A. Ferrare, Y.J. Kaufman, B.L. Markham, and S. Mattoo, 1992: Algorithm for atmospheric corrections of aircraft and satellite imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens., 13, 541–

557.

Frederick, J.E., R.P. Cebula, and D.F. Heath, 1986: Instrument characterization for detection of long-term changes in

stratospheric ozone: An analysis of the SBUV/2 radiometer. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 3, 472–480.

Frohlich, C., 1979: WMO/PMOD Sunphotometer: Instructions for Manufacture. World Meteor. Org., Geneva, Switzerland, 3 pp., (plus tables and drawings).

Frost, B.W., 1991: The role of grazing in nutrient rich areas of

the open seas. Limnol. Oceanogr., 36, 1,616–1,630.

Fukuchi, M., 1980: Phytoplankton chlorophyll stocks in the

Antarctic ocean. J. Oceanogr. Soc. Japan, 36, 73–84.

–G–

Gallaudet, T.C., and J.J. Simpson, 1991: Automated cloud

screening of AVHRR imagery using split-and-merge clustering. Remote Sens. Environ., 38, 77–121.

Garand, L., 1986: Automated Recognition of Oceanic Cloud

Patterns and Its Application to Remote Sensing of Meteorological Parameters. Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Meteorology, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.

General Sciences Corp., 1991: SeaWiFS Science Data and Information System Architecture Report. GSC-TR-21-91-006,

General Sciences Corp., Laurel, Maryland, 133 pp.

Gieskes, W.W.C., and G.W. Kraay, 1986: Analysis of phytoplankton pigments by HPLC before, during, and after

mass occurrence of the microflagellate corymbellus during

the spring bloom in the open north North Sea in 1983.

Mar. Biol., 92, 45–52.

Gleason, J.F., P.K. Bhartia, J.R. Herman, R. McPeters, P.

Newman, R.S. Stolarski, L. Flynn, G. Labow, D. Larko,

C. Seftor, C. Wellemeyer, W.D. Komhyr, A.J. Miller, and

W. Planet, 1993: Record low global ozone in 1992. Science,

260, 523–526.

Gordon, H.R., 1978: Removal of atmospheric effects from satellite imagery of the oceans. Appl. Opt., 17, 1,631–1,636.

, 1981a: Reduction of error introduced in the processing

of coastal zone color scanner-type imagery resulting from

sensor calibration and solar irradiance uncertainty. Appl.

Opt., 20, 207–210.

, 1981b: A preliminary assessment of the Nimbus-7 CZCS

atmospheric correction algorithm in a horizontally inhomogeneous atmosphere. Oceanography from Space, J.F.R.

Gower, Ed., Plenum Press, 257–266.

, 1985: Ship perturbations of irradiance measurements at

sea, 1: Monte Carlo simulations. Appl. Opt., 24, 4,172–

4,182.

, 1987a: Calibration requirements and methodology for

remote sensors viewing the ocean in the visible. Remote

Sens. Environ., 22, 103–126.

, 1987b: Visible calibration of ocean-viewing sensors. Remote Sens. of Environ., 22, 103–126.

, 1988: Ocean color remote sensing systems: radiometric

requirements. Recent Advances in Sensors, Radiometry,

and Data Processing for Remote Sensing, P.N. Slater, Ed.,

SPIE, 924, 151–167.

, 1989: Can the Lambert-Beer law be applied to the diffuse

attenuation coefficient of ocean water? Limnol. Oceanogr.,

34, 1,389–1,409.

, 1990: Radiometric considerations for ocean color remote

sensors. Appl. Opt., 29, 3,228–3,236.

, 1991: Absorption and scattering estimates from irradiance measurements: Monte Carlo simulations. Limnol.

Oceanogr., 36, 769–777.

, and D.K. Clark, 1980: Remote sensing optical properties

of a stratified ocean: an improved interpretation. Appl.

Opt., 19, 3,428–3,430.

27
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

, , J.L. Mueller, and W.A. Hovis, 1980: Phytoplankton

pigments from the NIMBUS-7 Coastal Zone Color Scanner: Comparisons with surface measurements. Science,

210, 63–66.

, and , 1981: Clear water radiances for atmospheric

correction of coastal zone color scanner imagery. Appl.

Opt., 20, 4,175–4,180.

, , J.W. Brown, O.B. Brown, and R.H. Evans, 1982:

Satellite measurements of phytoplankton pigment concentration in the surface waters of a warm core Gulf Stream

ring. J. Mar. Res., 40, 491–502.

, , , , , and W.W. Broenkow, 1983a: Phytoplankton pigment concentrations in the Middle Atlantic

Bight: Comparison of ship determinations and CZCS estimates. Appl. Opt., 22, 20–36.

, J.W. Brown, O.B. Brown, R.H. Evans, and D.K. Clark,

1983b: Nimbus 7 CZCS: reduction of its radiometric sensitivity with time. Appl. Opt., 24, 3,929–3,931.

, and D.J. Casta ̃no, 1987: Coastal Zone Color Scanner atmospheric correction algorithm: multiple scattering effects.

Appl. Opt., 26, 2,111–2,122.

, O.B. Brown, R.H. Evans, J.W. Brown, R.C. Smith, K.S.

Baker, and D.K. Clark, 1988a. A semianalytic radiance

model of ocean color. J. of Geophys. Res., 93, 10,909–

10,924.

, J.W. Brown, and R.H. Evans, 1988b: Exact Rayleigh

scattering calculations for use with the Nimbus-7 Coastal

Zone Color Scanner. Appl. Opt., 27, 5, 862–871.

, and D.J. Casta ̃no, 1989: Aerosol analysis with Coastal

Zone Color Scanner: A simple method for including multiple scattering effects. Appl. Opt., 28, 1,320–1,326.

, and K. Ding, 1991: Self shading of in-water optical instruments. Limnol. Oceanogr., 37, 491–500.

, and M. Wang, 1994: Retrieval of water-leaving radiances

and aerosol optical thickness over the oceans with SeaWiFS: a preliminary algorithm, Appl. Opt., 33, 443–452.

Gower, J.F.R., 1985: Reduction of the effect of clouds on satellite thermal imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens., 6, 1,419–1,434.

Gregg, W.W., 1992: Analysis of Orbit Selection for SeaWiFS:

Ascending vs. Descending Node. NASA Tech. Memo.

104566, Vol. 2, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 16 pp.

, 1993: The Simulated SeaWiFS Data Set, Version 1.

NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 9, S.B. Hooker and E.R.

Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,

Greenbelt, Maryland, 17 pp.

, and K.L. Carder, 1990: A simple spectral solar irradiance model for cloudless maritime atmospheres. Limnol.

Oceanogr., 35, 1,657–1,675.

, and F.S. Patt, 1994: Assessment of tilt capability for

spaceborne global ocean color sensors. IEEE Trans. Geosci.

Remote Sens., 32, 866–877.

Griggs, M., 1968: Absorption coefficients of ozone in the ultraviolet and visible regions. J. Chem. Phys., 49, 857.

Groom, S.B., and P.M. Holligan, 1987: Remote sensing of coccolithophorid blooms. Adv. Space Res., 7, 73–78.

Guenther, B., 1991: Accuracy and precisions actually achieved

for large aperture sources for aircraft and space investigations. Metrologia, 28, 229–232.

Gutman, G., D. Tarpley, and G. Ohring, 1987: Cloud screening for determination of land surface characteristics in a

reduced resolution satellite data set. Int. J. Remote Sens.,

8, 859–870.

–H–

Habermann, T., 1991: Freeform—A Flexible System of Format

Specifications For Data Access. National Geophysical Data

Center, NOAA, 37 pp.

Haury, L.R., J.J. Simpson, J. Pelaez, C. Koblinsky, and D.

Wiesenhahn, 1986: Biological consequences of a recurrent

eddy off Point Conception, California. J. Geophys. Res.,

91, 12,937–12,956.

Hay, B.J., C.R. McClain, and M. Petzold, 1993: An assessment

of the NIMBUS-7 CZCS calibration for May 1986 using

satellite and in situ data from the Arabian Sea. Remote

Sens. Environ., 43, 35–46.

Hayes, S.P., L.J. Mangum, J. Picaut, A. Sumi, and K. Takeuchi,

1991: TOGA-TAO: A moored array for real-time measurements in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Bull. Am. Meteor.

Soc., 72, 339–347.

Helliwell, W.S., G.N. Sullivan, B. MacDonald, and K.J. Voss,

1990: Ship shadowing: model and data comparison. Ocean

Optics X, R.W. Spinrad, Ed., SPIE, 1302, 55–71.

Herman, J.R., R.D. Hudson, and G.N. Serafino, 1990: An

analysis of the 8 year trend in ozone depletion from alternate models of SBUV instrument degradation. J. Geophys.

Res., 95, 7,403–7,416.

Hoge, F.E., and R.N. Swift, 1990: Phytoplankton accessory

pigments: Evidence for the influence of phycoerythrin on

the submarine light field. Remote Sens. Environ., 34, 19–

25.

Holm-Hansen, O., C.J. Lorenzen, R.W. Holmes, and J.D.H.

Strickland, 1965: Fluorometric determination of chlorophyll. J. du Cons. Int’l. pour l’Explor. de la Mer, 30,

3–15.

Hooker, S.B., P.L. Coronado, W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman,

W.W. Gregg, C.R. McClain, B.W. Meeson, L.M. Olsen,

R.A. Barnes, and E.F. Del-Colle, 1992a: Baselines and

Background Documentation, SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting, January, 1993, Volume 1, S.B. Hooker and W.E. Esaias, Eds., SeaWiFS Proj. Office, NASA Goddard Space

Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 244 pp.

, W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman, W.W. Gregg, and C.R. McClain, 1992b: An Overview of SeaWiFS and Ocean Color.

NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 1, S.B. Hooker and E.R.

Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,

Greenbelt, Maryland, 24 pp., plus color plates.

, W.L. Barnes W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman, W.W. Gregg,

R.G. Kirk, C.R. McClain, C.H. Vermillion, D.J. Zukor,

R.A. Barnes, 1993a: SeaWiFS Project Presentations, SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting, January, 1993, Volume 2.

S.B. Hooker and W.E. Esaias, Eds., SeaWiFS Proj. Office,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,

Maryland, 235 pp.

28
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

, W.E. Esaias, and L.A. Rexrode, 1993b: Proceedings of

the First SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting. NASA Tech.

Memo. 104566, Vol. 8, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone,

Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,

Maryland, 61 pp.

, C.R. McClain, and A. Holmes, 1993c: Ocean color imaging: CZCS to SeaWiFS. Mar. Tech. Soc. J., 27, 3–15.

Hoots, F.R., and R.L. Roehrich, 1980: Models for Propagation

of NORAD Element Sets. Project Spacetrack Report No.

3, 100 pp.

Hoppel, W.A., J.W. Fitzgerald, G.M. Frick, and R.E. Larson, 1990: Aerosol size distributions and optical properties found in the marine boundary layer over the Atlantic

Ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 3,659–3,686.

Hovis, W.A., 1981: The Nimbus-7 Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS) program. Oceanography from Space, J.F.R.

Gower, Ed., Plenum Press, 213–225.

, and K.C. Leung, 1977: Remote sensing of ocean color.

Optical Eng., 16, 158–166.

, D.K. Clark, F. Anderson, R.W. Austin, W.H. Wilson,

E.T. Baker, D. Ball, H.R. Gordon, J.L. Mueller, S. ElSayed, B. Sturm, R.C. Wrigley, and C.S. Yentsch, 1980:

NIMBUS-7 Coastal Zone Color Scanner: System description and initial imagery. Science, 210, 60–63.

, J.S. Knoll, and G.R. Smith, 1985: Aircraft measurements

for calibration of an orbiting spacecraft sensor. Appl. Opt.

24, 407–410.

Hughes, C.G., III, 1982: Silicon photodiode absolute spectral

self-calibration using a filtered tungsten source. Appl. Opt.,

21, 2,129–2,132.

–I–

Inn, E.C.Y., and Y. Tanaka, 1953: Absorption coefficient of

ozone in the ultraviolet and visible regions. J. Opt. Soc.

Amer., 43, 870–873.

Iqbal, M., 1983: An Introduction to Solar Radiation. Academic

Press, 390 pp.

Ishizaka, J., 1990a: Coupling of Coastal Zone Color Scanner

data to physical-biological model of the southeastern U.S.

continental shelf ecosystem, 1. CZCS data description and

Lagrangian particle tracing experiments. J. Geophys. Res.,

95, 10,167–10,181.

, 1990b: Coupling of Coastal Zone Color Scanner data to

physical-biological model of the southeastern U.S. continental shelf ecosystem, 2. an Eulerian model. J. Geophys.

Res., 95, 10,183–10,199.

, 1990c: Coupling of Coastal Zone Color Scanner data

to physical-biological model of the southeastern U.S. continental shelf ecosystem, 3. nutrient and phytoplankton

fluxes and CZCS data assimilation. J. Geophys. Res., 95,

10,201–10,212.

–J–

Jerlov, N.G., 1976: Marine Optics, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., 231 pp.

Joint EOSAT–NASA SeaWiFS Working Group, 1987: System

concept for wide-field-of-view observations of ocean phenomena from space. Report of the Joint EOSAT/NASA

SeaWiFS Working Group, Earth Observation Satellite Co.,

Lanham, Maryland, 92 pp.

Joint Global Ocean Flux Study, 1991: JGOFS Core Measurements Protocols. JGOFS Report No. 6, Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research, 40 pp.

Joseph, J.H., 1985: The morphology of fair weather cumulus

cloud fields as remotely sensed from satellites and some

applications. Adv. Space Res., 5, 213–216.

Jursa, A.S., 1985: Handbook of Geophysics and the Space Environment. Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, 18-11–18-24.

Justice, J.O., B.L. Markham, J.R.G. Townshend, and R.L.

Kennard, 1989: Spatial degradation of satellite data. Int.

J. Remote Sens., 10, 1,539–1,561.

Justus, C.G., and M.V. Paris, 1985: A model for solar spectral

irradiance and radiance at the bottom and top of a cloudless atmosphere, J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 24, 193–205.

–K–

Kasten, F., 1966: A new table and approximate formula for

relative optical air mass. Geophys. Biokimatol., B14, 206–

223.

Kaufman, Y.J., 1987: The effect of subpixel clouds on remote

sensing. Int. J. Remote Sens., 8, 839–857.

Kelly, K.A., 1985: Separating clouds from ocean in infrared

images. Remote Sensing Environ., 17, 67–83.

Kerr, R.A., 1993: Ozone takes a nose dive after the eruption of

Mt. Pinatubo. Science, 260, 490–491.

Key, J.R., and R.G. Barry, 1989: Cloud cover analysis with

Arctic AVHRR data. 1. Cloud detection. J. Geophys. Res.,

94, 18,521–18,535.

, J.A. Maslanik, and R.G. Barry, 1989: Cloud classification

from satellite data using a fuzzy sets algorithm: A polar

example. Int. J. Remote Sens., 10, 1,823–1,842.

Kidwell, K.B., 1991: NOAA Polar Orbiter User’s Guide. NOAA

NESDIS, Washington D.C., 279 pp.

Kiefer, D.A., and R.A. Reynolds, 1992: Advances in understanding phytoplankton fluorescence and photosynthesis.

Primary Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea,

P.G. Falkowski and A.D. Woodhead, Eds., Plenum Press,

155–174.

King, M.D., Y.J. Kaufman, W.P. Menzel, and D. Tanre, 1992:

Remote sensing of cloud, aerosol, and water vapor properties from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer

(MODIS). IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 30, 2–27.

Kneizys, F.X., E.P. Shettle, W.O. Gallery, J.H. Chetwynd,

L.W. Abreu, J.E.A. Selby, S.A. Clough, and R.W. Fenn,

1983: Atmospheric transmittance/ radiance: computer code

LOWTRAN 6. AFGL-TR-83-0187, Air Force Geophysics

Lab, Hanscom AFB, Massachusetts, 200 pp.

Koepke, P., 1985: The reflectance factors of a rough ocean with

foam. Comment on “Remote sensing of sea state using the

0.8–1.1 m spectral band” by L. Wald and M. Monget. Int.

J. Remote Sens., 6, 787–799.

29
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

Kohler, R., R. Pello, and J. Bonhoure, 1990: Temperature dependent nonlinearity effects of a QED-200 detector in the

visible. Appl. Opt., 29, 4,212–4,215.

Kuring, N., M.R. Lewis, T. Platt, and J.E. O’Reilly, 1990:

Satellite-derived estimates of primary production on the

northwest Atlantic continental shelf. Cont. Shelf Res., 10,

461–484.

–L–

Lee, Z., K.L. Carder, S.K. Hawes, R.G. Steward, T.G. Peacock

and C.O. Davis, 1992: An interpretation of high spectral

resolution remote sensing reflectance. Optics of the Air-Sea

Interface: Theory and Measurement, L. Estep, Ed., SPIE,

1749, 49–64.

Lyddane, R.H., 1963: Small eccentricities or inclinations in the

Brouwer theory of the artificial satellite. Astron. J., 68,

555–558.

Lynnes, C., B. Vollmer, H. Griffioen, and P. King, 1992: Metadata Submission Guide, version 0.9. NASA Goddard Space

Flight Center DAAC, Oct. 2, 1992, NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland, 11 pp.

–M–

Mantoura, R.F.C., and C.A. Llewellyn, 1983: The rapid determination of algal chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments

and their breakdown products in natural waters by reversephase high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal.

Chim. Acta, 151, 297–314.

Marshall, B.R., and R.C. Smith, 1990: Raman scattering and

in-water optical properties. Appl. Opt., 29, 71–84.

McClain, C.R., and L.P. Atkinson, 1985: A note on the Charleston Gyre. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 11,857–11,861.

, S.-Y. Chao, L. Atkinson, J. Blanton, and F. de Castillejo,

1986: Wind-driven upwelling in the vicinity of Cape Finisterre, Spain. J. Geophys. Res., 91, 8,470–8,486.

, J.A. Yoder, L.P. Atkinson, J.O. Blanton, T.N. Lee, J.J.

Singer, and F. Muller-Karger, 1988: Variability of Surface

Pigment Concentrations in the South Atlantic Bight. J.

Geophys. Res., 93, 10,675–10,697.

, J. Ishizaka, and E. Hofmann, 1990a: Estimation of phytoplankton pigment changes on the Southeastern U.S. continental shelf from a sequence of CZCS images and a coupled

physical-biological model. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 20,213–

20,235.

, W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman, J. Elrod, D. Endres, J. Firestone, M. Darzi, R. Evans, and J. Brown, 1990b: Physical

and biological processes in the North Atlantic during the

First Global GARP Experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 95,

18,027–18,048.

, M. Darzi, J. Firestone, E.-n. Yeh, G. Fu, and D. Endres,

1991a: SEAPAK Users Guide, Version 2.0, Vol. I—System

Description. NASA Tech. Mem. 100728, NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 158 pp.

, , , , , and , 1991b: SEAPAK Users

Guide, Version 2.0, Vol. II—Descriptions of Programs.

NASA Tech. Mem. 100728, NASA Goddard Space Flight

Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 586 pp.

, C.J. Koblinsky, J. Firestone, M. Darzi, E-n. Yeh, and B.

Beckley, 1991c: An examination of some Southern Ocean

data sets, EOS Trans. AGU, 72, 345–351.

, W.E. Esaias, W. Barnes, B. Guenther, D. Endres, S.B.

Hooker, G. Mitchell, and R. Barnes, 1992a: Calibration

and Validation Plan for SeaWiFS. NASA Tech. Memo.

104566, Vol. 3, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 41 pp.

, G. Fu., M. Darzi, and J.K. Firestone, 1992b: PC-SEAPAK

User’s Guide, Version 4.0. NASA Technical Memorandum

104557, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,

Maryland, 408 pp.

, E-n. Yeh, and G. Fu, 1992c: An Analysis of GAC Sampling Algorithms: A Case Study. NASA Tech. Memo.

104566, Vol. 4, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 20 pp., plus color plates.

, G. Feldman, and W. Esaias, 1993: Oceanic primary production. Global Change Atlas, C. Parkinson, J. Foster, and

R. Gurney, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 251–263.

, and E-n. Yeh, 1994: “CZCS Bio-Optical Algorithm Comparison.” In: McClain, C.R., J.C. Comiso, R.S. Fraser,

J.K. Firestone, B.D. Scheiber, E-n. Yeh, K.R. Arrigo, and

C.W. Sullivan, 1994: Case Studies for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 1. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566,

Vol. 13, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 3–8.

, and , 1994: “Sun glint flag sensitivity study.” In:

C.R. McClain, J.C. Comiso, R.S. Fraser, J.K. Firestone,

B.D. Schieber, E-n. Yeh, K.R. Arrigo, and C.W. Sullivan,

1994: Case Studies for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 1. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 13, S.B.

Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space

Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 46–47.

McClain, E.P., 1989: Global sea surface temperatures and cloud

clearing for aerosol optical depth estimates. Int. J. Remote

Sens., 10, 763–769.

, W.G. Pichel, and C.C. Walton, 1985: Comparative performance of AVHRR-based multichannel sea surface temperatures. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 11,587–11,601.

McLean, J.T., and B.W. Guenther, 1989: Radiance calibration

of spherical integrators. Optical Radiation Measurements

II, SPIE, 1109, 114–121.

Mecherikunnel, A.T., and H.L. Kyle, 1991: Eleven-year cycle

of solar constant variation from spacecraft measurements:

1978 to 1990. Science, (withdrawn).

Meindl, E.A., and G.D. Hamilton, 1992: Programs of the National Data Buoy Center, Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 73, 985–

993.

Michaelsen, J., X. Zhang, and R.C. Smith, 1988: Variability

of pigment biomass in the California Current system as

determined by satellite imagery, 2. temporal variability. J.

Geophys. Res., 93, 10,883–10,896.

Mitchell, B.G., 1990: Algorithms for determining the absorption coefficient for aquatic particulates using the quantitative filter technique. Ocean Optics X, R.W. Spinrad, Ed.,

SPIE, 1302, 137–148.

30
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

, and D.A. Kiefer, 1984: Determination of absorption and

fluorescence excitation spectra for phytoplankton. Marine

Phytoplankton and Productivity, O. Holm-Hansen, L. Bolis,

and R. Gilles, Eds., Springer-Verlag, 157–169.

, and , 1988: Chlorophyll–a specific absorption and fluorescence excitation spectra for light-limited phytoplankton. Deep-Sea Res., 35, 639–663.

, and O. Holm-Hansen, 1991: Bio-optical properties of

Antarctic Peninsula waters: differentiation from temperate ocean models. Deep-Sea Res., 39, 1,009–1,028.

Morel, A., 1980: In-water and remote measurements of ocean

color. Bound.-layer Meteor., 18, 178–201.

, and L. Prieur, 1977: Analysis of variations in ocean color.

Limnol. Oceanogr., 22, 709–722.

, and R.C. Smith, 1982: Terminology and units in optical

oceanography. Mar. Geod., 5, 335–349.

Mueller, J.L., 1985: Nimbus–7 CZCS: confirmation of its radiometric sensitivity decay rate through 1982. Appl. Opt.,

24, 1,043–1,047.

, 1988: Nimbus-7 CZCS: electronic overshoot due to cloud

reflectance. Appl. Opt., 27, 438–440.

, 1991: Integral Method for Irradiance Profile Analysis.

CHORS Tech. Memo. 007-91, San Diego State Univ., San

Diego, California, 10 pp.

, 1993: The First SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin

Experiment, SIRREX-1, July 1992. NASA Tech. Memo.

104566, Vol. 14, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 60 pp.

, and R.E. Lang, 1989: Bio-optical provinces of the northeast Pacific Ocean: a provisional analysis. Limnol. Oceanogr., 34, 1,572–1,586.

, and R.W. Austin, 1992: Ocean Optics Protocols. NASA

Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 5, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 45 pp.

, B.C. Johnson, C.L. Cromer, J.W. Cooper, J.T. McLean,

S.B. Hooker, and T.L. Westphal, 1994: The Second SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin Experiment, SIRREX-2, June 1993. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 16,

S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 121 pp.

Muller-Karger, F., C.R. McClain, and P. Richardson, 1988:

The dispersal of the Amazon water. Nature, 333, 56–59.

, , T.R. Fisher, W.E. Esaias, and R. Varela, 1989:

Pigment distribution in the Caribbean Sea: Observations

from space. Prog. Oceanogr., 23, 23–64.

, , R.N. Sambrotto, and G.C. Ray, 1990: A comparison

of ship and CZCS-mapped distributions of phytoplankton

in the Southeastern Bering Sea. J. Geophys. Res., 95,

11,483–11,499.

, J.J. Walsh, R.H. Evans, and M.B. Meyers, 1991: On

the seasonal phytoplankton concentration and sea surface

temperature cycles of the Gulf of Mexico as determined by

satellites. J. Geophys. Res., 96, 12,645–12,665.

–N–

National Academy of Sciences, 1984: Global Ocean Flux Study,

Proceedings of a Workshop, National Acad. Press, 360 pp.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1982: The

marine resources experiment program (MAREX). Report

of the Ocean Color Science Working Group, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 107 pp.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

1990: NDBC Data Availability Summary, 1801-24-02 Rev.

E, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Data Buoy Center,

Stennis Space Center, 88 pp.

National Research Council, 1990: TOGA, A Review of Progress

and Future Opportunities. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 66 pp.

National Space Science Data Center, 1991: NSSDC CDFUser’s

Guide for UNIX Systems, version 2.1. Publication NSSDCWDC-A-R&S 91-30, 245 pp.

, 1993: NODIS (NSSDC’s On-line Data and Information

Service) [database on-line] Master Directory [cited July

1993] Data Set Information Search; identifier: Multiple

Key Word Search—TOMS and COADS.

Neckel, H., and D. Labs, 1984: The solar radiation between

3300 and 12500  ̊A. Sol. Phys., 90, 205–258.

–O–

Olesen, F.-S., and H. Grassel, 1985: Cloud detection and classification over the oceans at night with NOAA-7. Int. J.

Remote Sens., 6, 1,435–1,444.

Olsen, L.M., and C.R. McClain, 1992: Cooperative efforts in

support of ocean research through NASA’s Climate Data

System. Proc. Eighth Int. Conf. on Interactive Inform. and

Processing Systems for Meteor., Oceanogr., and Hydrol.,

Am. Meteor. Soc., 206–211.

– P, Q –

Pagano, T.S., and R.M. Durham, 1993: Moderate resolution

imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS). Proc. SPIE, 1,939,

2–17.

Palmer, J.M., 1988: Use of self-calibrated detectors in radiometric instruments. Recent Advances in Sensors, Radiometry, and Data Processing for Remote Sensing. P.N. Slater,

Ed., SPIE, 924, 224–231.

Paltridge, G.W., and C.M.R. Platt, 1976: Radiative processes

in meteorology and climatology. Developments in Atmospheric Science, Vol. 5. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co.,

318 pp.

Parikh, J.A., 1977: A comparative study of cloud classification

techniques. Remote Sens. Environ., 6, 67–81.

Patt, F.S., C.W. Hoisington, W.W. Gregg, and P.L. Coronado,

1993: Analysis of Selected Orbit Propagation Models for

the SeaWiFS Mission. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol.

11, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 16 pp.

31
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

, and W.W. Gregg, 1994: Exact closed-form geolocation

algorithm for Earth survey sensors. Inter. J. Remote Sens.,

15, 3,719–3,734.

Petzold, T.J., 1988: A Method for Obtaining Analytical Curve

Fits to Underwater Radiometric Measurements. Tech.

Memo. Oc Op/TJP–88–06t, Scripps Inst. of Oceanogr., La

Jolla, California, 20 pp.

, and R.W. Austin, 1988: Characterization of MER-1032.

Tech. Memo. EV–001–88t, Vis. Lab., Scripps Inst. of Ocean

ogr., La Jolla, California, 56 pp.

Pinder, G.F., and W.G. Gray, 1977: Finite Element Simulation in Surface and Subsurface Hydrology. Academic Press,

295 pp.

Phulpin, T., M. Derrien, and A. Brard, 1983: A two-dimensional histogram procedure to analyze cloud cover from NOAA

satellite high-resolution imagery. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,

22 1,332–1,345.

Platt, T., and S. Sathyendranath, 1988: Oceanic primary production: estimation by remote sensing at local and regional

scales. Science, 241, 1,613–1,620.

, , C.M. Caverhill, and M.R. Lewis, 1988: Ocean primary production and available light: further algorithms for

remote sensing. Deep-Sea Res., 35, 855–879.

, and , 1993: Comment on “The remote sensing of

ocean primary productivity: Use of a new data compilation

to test satellite algorithms,” by, William Balch et al., J.

Geophys. Res., 98, 16,583–16,584.

–R–

Raschke, E., P. Bauer, and H.J. Lutz, 1992: Remote sensing

of clouds and surface radiation budget over polar regions.

Int. J. Remote Sens., 13, 13–22.

Research Systems, Inc., 1992a: Interactive Data Language

(IDL) User’s Guide, Ver. 3.0. Boulder, Colorado, 356 pp.

, 1992b: Interactive Data Language (IDL) Reference Guide,

Version 3.0. Boulder, Colorado, 424 pp.

Reynolds, D.W., and T.H. Vonder Haar, 1977: A bispectral

method for cloud parameter determination. Mon. Wea.

Rev., 105, 446–457.

Reynolds, R.W., 1988: A real-time global sea surface temperature analysis. J. Climate, 1, 75–86.

Rossow, W.B., L.C. Garder, P.-J. Lu, and A. Walker, 1988:

International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP)

Documentation of Cloud Data. WMO/TD-No. 266, World

Meteor. Org., Geneva.

, L.C. Garder, and A.A. Lacis, 1989: Global, seasonal cloud

variations from satellite radiance measurements. Part I:

Sensitivity of analysis. J. Climate, 2, 419–458.

, and R.A. Schiffer, 1991: ISCCP cloud data products.

Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 72, 2–20.

–S–

Saunders, R.W., 1986: An automated scheme for the removal

of cloud contamination for AVHRR radiances over western

Europe. Int. J. Remote Sens., 7, 867–888.

, 1989: A comparison of satellite-retrieved parameters with

mesoscale model results. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 115,

551–572.

, and K.T. Kriebel, 1988: An improved method for detecting clear sky and cloudy radiances from AVHRR data. Int.

J. Remote Sens., 9, 123–150, Errata, ibid., 9, 1,393–1,394.

Shaw, G.E., 1976: Error analysis of multiwavelength sun photometry. Pure Appl. Geophys., 114, 1–14.

Simpson, J.J., and C. Humphrey, 1990: An automated cloud

screening algorithm for daytime Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer imagery. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 13,459–

13,481.

Slater, P.N., and J.M. Palmer, 1991: Solar-diffuser panel and

ratioing radiometer approach to satellite sensor on-board

calibration. Proc. SPIE, 1,493, 100–105.

Slutz, R.J., S.J. Lubker, J.D. Hiscox, S.D. Woodruff, R.L. Jenne,

P.M. Steurer, and J.D. Elms, 1985: Comprehensive OceanAtmosphere Data Set; Release 1. Climate Research Program, Boulder, Colorado, 263 pp.

Smith, R.C., and K.S. Baker, 1981: Optical properties of the

clearest natural waters (200–800 nm). Appl. Opt., 20, 177–

184.

, , and P. Dustan, 1981: Fluorometric techniques for

the measurement of oceanic chlorophyll in the support of

remote sensing. SIO Ref. 81–17, Scripps Inst. of Oceanogr., La Jolla, California 14 pp.

, and W.H. Wilson, 1981: Ship and satellite bio-optical

research in the California Bight. Oceanography from Space,

J.F.R. Gower, Ed., Plenum Press, 281–294.

, and K.S. Baker, 1984: Analysis of ocean optical data.

Ocean Optics VII, M. Blizard, Ed., SPIE 478, 119–126.

, and , 1985: Spatial and temporal patterns in pigment biomass in Gulf Stream Warm-Core Ring 82B and

its environs. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 8,859–8,870.

, and , 1986: Analysis of ocean optical data. Ocean

Optics VIII, P.N. Slater, Ed., SPIE, 637, 95–107.

, O.B. Brown, F.E. Hoge, K.S. Baker, R.H. Evans, R.N.

Swift, and W.E. Esaias, 1987: Multiplatform sampling

(ship, aircraft, and satellite) of a Gulf Stream warm core

ring. Appl. Optics, 26, 2,068–2,081.

, X. Zhang, and J. Michaelsen, 1988: Variability of pigment

biomass in the California Current system as determined by

satellite imagery, 1. Spatial variability. J. Geophys. Res.,

93, 10,863–10,882.

, and K.S. and Baker, 1989: Stratospheric ozone, middle ultraviolet radiation and phytoplankton productivity.

Oceanography, 2, 4–10.

, K.J. Waters, and K.S. Baker, 1991: Optical variability

and pigment biomass in the Sargasso Sea as determined

using deep-sea optical mooring data. J. Geophys. Res.,

96, 8,665–8,686.

, B.B. Pr ́ezelin, K.S. Baker, R.R. Bidigare, N.P. Boucher,

T. Coley, D. Karentz, S. MacIntyre, H.A. Matlick, D. Menzies, M. Ondrusek, Z. Wan and K.J. Waters, 1992: Ozone

depletion: Ultraviolet radiation and phytoplankton biology

in Antarctic waters. Science, 255, 952–959.

32
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

Smith, S.L., W. Balch, K. Banse, W. Berelson, P. Brewer, O.

Brown, K. Cochran, H. Livingston, M. Luther, C. McClain, D. Olson, L. Peterson, W. Peterson, W. Prell, L.

Codispoti, A. Devol, H. Ducklow, R. Fine, G. Hitchcock,

D. Lal, D. Repeta, E. Sherr, N. Surgi, J. Swallow, S.

Wakeham, and K. Wishner, 1991: U.S. JGOFS: Arabian

Sea Process Study. U.S. JGOFS Planning Report No. 13,

Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 164 pp.

Smith, W.L., P.K. Rao, R. Koffler, and W.P. Curtis, 1970:

The determination of sea surface temperature from satellite

high-resolution infrared window radiation measurements.

Mon. Wea. Rev., 98, 604–611.

Sørensen, B., 1981: Recommendations of the 2nd international

workshop on atmospheric correction of satellite observation

of sea water colour. March 30–April 1, Ispra, Italy, 49 pp.

Stackpole, J.D., 1990: GRIB and BUFR: The only codes you

will ever need. SixthIntl. Conf. on Interactive Information and Processing Systems for Meteorol., Oceanogr., and

Hydrol., Am. Meteorol. Soc., Anaheim, California, 23–30.

Stone, R.S., G.L. Stephens, C.M.R. Platt, and S. Banks, 1990:

The remote sensing of thin cirrus cloud using satellites,

lidar and radiative transfer theory. J. Appl. Meteor., 29,

353–366.

Stowe, L.L., C.G. Wellemeyer, T.F. Eck, H.Y.M. Yeh, and the

Nimbus-7 Cloud Data Processing Team, 1988: Nimbus-7

global cloud climatology. J. Climate, 1, 445–470.

, E.P. McClain, R. Carey, P. Pellegrino, G. Gutman, P.

Davis, C. Long, and S. Hart, 1991: Global distribution

of cloud cover derived from NOAA/AVHRR operational

satellite data. Adv. Space Phys., 11(3), 51–54.

Stramski, D., 1990: Artifacts in measuring absorption spectra

of phytoplankton collected on a filter. Limnol. Oceanogr.,

35, 1,804–1,809.

Strickland, J.D.H., and T.R. Parsons, 1972: A Practical Handbook of Sea Water Analysis. Fish. Res. Board. Canada,

310 pp.

Strub, P.T., C. James, A.C. Thomas, and M.R. Abbott, 1990:

Seasonal and nonseasonal variability of satellite-derived

surface pigment concentration in the California Current.

J. Geophys. Res., 95, 11,501–11,530.

Sturm, B., 1981: The atmospheric correction of remotely sensed

data and the quantitative determination of suspended matter in marine water surface layers. Rem. Sens. in Meteor.,

Oceanogr., and Hydrol., A.P. Cracknell, Ed., John Wiley

& Sons, 163–197.

, 1993: CZCS data processing algorithms. Ocean Colour:

Theory and Applications in a Decade of CZCS Experience,

V. Barale and P.M. Schlittenhardt (Eds.), ECSC, EEC,

EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, 95–116.

Sullivan, C.W., C.R. McClain, J.C. Comiso, and W.O. Smith,

Jr., 1988: Phytoplankton standing crops within an Antarctic ice edge assessed by satellite remote sensing. J. Geophys. Res., 93, 12,487–12,498.

–T–

Thiermann, V., and E. Ruprecht, 1992: A method for the detection of clouds using AVHRR infrared observations. Int.

J. Remote Sens., 13, 1,829–1,841.

Toll, R.F., Jr., and W.M. Clune, 1985: An operational evaluation of the Navy Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction System (NOGAPS): 48-hour surface pressure forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 113, 1,433–1,440.

Traganza, E., V. Silva, D. Austin, W. Hanson, and S. Bronsink, 1983: Nutrient mapping and recurrence of coastal upwelling centers by satellite remote sensing: Its implication

to primary production and the sediment record. Coastal

Upwelling, E. Suess and J. Thiede, Ed., Plenum Press, 61–

83.

Trees, C.C., M.C. Kennicutt, II, and J.M. Brooks, 1985: Errors

associated with the standard fluorometric determination of

chlorophylls and phaeopigments. Mar. Chem., 17, 1–12.

Trenberth, K.E., and J.G. Olson, 1988: An evaluation and intercomparison of global analyses from the National Meteorological Center and the European Centre for Me-dium

Range Weather Forecasts. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 69,

1,047–1,057.

, W.G. Large, and J.G. Olson, 1990: The mean annual cycle in global ocean wind stress. J. Phys. Ocean

ogr., 20, 1,742–1,760.

Tucker, C.J., and L.D. Miller, 1977: Soil spectra contributions

to grass canopy spectral reflectance. Photogrammetry, Engineering, and Remote Sens., 721–726.

Tyler, J.E., and R.C. Smith, 1970: Measurements of Spectral

Irradiance Underwater. Gordon and Breach, 103 pp.

–U–

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1989: NCSA HDF

Specification. 43 pp.

, 1993: NCSA HDF Calling Interfaces and Utilities, Version 3.2. 121 pp.

–V–

Viollier, M., 1982: Radiance calibration of the Coastal Zone

Color Scanner: a proposed adjustment. Appl. Opt., 21,

1,142–1,145.

Viollier, M., D. Tanr ́e, and P.Y. Deschamps, 1980: An algorithm for remote sensing of water color from space. Bound.-

Layer Meteor., 18, 247–267.

Voss, K.J., J.W. Nolten, and G.D. Edwards, 1986: Ship shadow

effects on apparent optical properties. Ocean Optics VIII,

M. Blizard, Ed., SPIE, 637, 186–190.

, and G. Zibordi, 1989: Radiometric and geometric calibration of a spectral electro-optic “fisheye” camera radiance

distribution system. J. of Atmos. and Ocean. Technol., 6,

652–662.

–W–

Walker, J.H., R.D. Saunders, J.K. Jackson, and D.A. McSparron, 1987: Spectral Irradiance Calibrations. NBS Special

Publication 250–20, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 37 pp. plus appendices.

33
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

., C.L. Cromer, and J.T. McLean, 1991: Technique for improving the calibration of large-area sphere sources. Ocean

Optics, B.W. Guenther, Ed., SPIE, 1493, 224–230.

Walsh, J.J., G.T. Rowe, R.L. Iverson, and C.P. McRoy, 1981:

Biological export of shelf carbon is a sink of the global CO2

cycle. Nature, 291, 196–201.

Walters, N.M., 1983: Coastal zone colour scanner (CZCS) algorithm description for the South African coastal waters.

Internal report, NPRL Div. of Optical Sciences, Pretoria,

S. Africa, 30 pp.

Warneck, P., 1988: Chemistry of the Natural Atmosphere. Academic Press, 757 pp.

Waters, K.J., R.C. Smith, and M.R. Lewis, 1990: Avoiding

ship induced light field perturbation in the determination

of oceanic optical properties. Oceanogr., 3, 18–21.

Weare, B.C., 1992: A comparison of the ISCCP C1 cloud

amounts with those derived from high resolution AVHRR

images. Int. J. Remote Sens., 13, 1,965–1,980.

Weinreb, M.P., G. Hamilton, S. Brown, and R.J. Koczor, 1990:

Nonlinear corrections in calibration of Advanced Very High

Resolution Radiometer infrared channels. J. Geophys.

Res., 95, 7,381–7,388.

Weller, M. and U. Leiterer, 1988: Experimental data on spectral aerosol optical thickness and its global distribution.

Beitr. Phys. Atmosph., 61, 1–9.

Wertz, J.R. (Ed.), 1978: Spacecraft Attitude Determination and

Control. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 858 pp.

Williams, S.P., E.F. Szajna, and W.A. Hovis, 1985a: Nimbus 7

Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS) Level 1 Data Product

Users’ Guide. NASA Tech. Memo. 86203, NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 49 pp.

, , and , 1985b: Nimbus 7 Coastal Zone Color

Scanner (CZCS), Level 2 Data Product Users’ Guide.

NASA Tech. Memo. 86202, NASA Goddard Space Flight

Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 57 pp.

Wilson, W.H., R.C. Smith, and J.W. Nolten, 1981: The CZCS

Geolocation Algorithms. SIO Ref. 81-32, Scripps Inst. of

Oceanogr., La Jolla, California, 37 pp.

Woodruff, S.D., R.J. Slutz, R.L. Jenne, and P.M. Steurer, 1987:

A comprehensive ocean-atmosphere data set. Bull. Am.

Meteor. Soc., 68, 1,239–1,250.

Woodward, R.H., J. Firestone, and C.R. McClain, 1992: Progress report on AVHRR/Pathfinder activities. Internal document submitted to Pathfinder Project, NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 14 pp.

, R.A. Barnes, C.R. McClain, W.E. Esaias, W.L. Barnes,

and A.T. Mecherikunnel, 1993: Modeling of the SeaWiFS

Solar and Lunar Observations. NASA Tech. Memo.

104566, Vol. 10, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 26 pp.

World Meteorological Organization, 1990: Report of the International Ozone Trends Panel, 1988: World Meteorological

Organization Global Ozone Researchand Monitoring Project, Report No. 18, 2 Vols., Geneva, Switzerland.

Wroblewski, J.S., J.L. Sarmiento, and G.R. Flierl, 1988: An

ocean basin scale model of plankton dynamics in the North

Atlantic 1. solutions for the climatological oceanographic

conditions in May. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 2, 199–218.

Wu, R., J.A. Weinman, and R.T. Chin, 1985: Determination

of rainfall rates from GOES satellite images by a pattern

recognition technique. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 2, 314–

330.

Wyatt, C.L., 1978: Radiometric Calibration: Theory and Methods. Academic Press, 200 pp.

– X, Y –

Yamanouchi, T., and S. Kawaguchi, 1992: Cloud distribution

in the Antarctic from AVHRR data and radiation measurements at the surface. Int. J. Remote Sens., 13, 111–

127.

Yentsch, C.S., 1983: Remote Sensing of Biological Substances.

Remote Sensing Applications in Marine Science and Technology, A.P. Cracknell, Ed., D. Reidel Publishing Co., 263–

297.

, and D.W. Menzel, 1963: A method for the determination

of phytoplankton, chlorophyll, and phaeophytin by fluorescence. Deep-Sea Res., 10, 221–231.

, and D.A. Phinney, 1985: Rotary motion and convection

as a means of regulating primary production in warm core

rings. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 3,237–3,248.

Yoder, J.A., C.R. McClain, J.O. Blanton, and L.-Y. Oey, 1987:

Spatial scales in CZCS-chlorophyll imagery of the southeastern U.S. continental shelf. Limnol. Oceanogr., 32, 929–

941.

–Z–

Zalewski, E.F., and C.R. Duda, 1983: Silicon photodiode device

with 100% external quantum efficiency. Appl. Opt., 22,

2,867–2,873.

34
E.R. Firestone and S.B. Hooker

The SeaWiFS Technical Report Series

Vol. 1

Hooker, S.B., W.E. Esaias, G.C. Feldman, W.W. Gregg, and

C.R. McClain, 1992: An Overview of SeaWiFS and Ocean

Color. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 1, S.B. Hooker

and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight

Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 24 pp., plus color plates.

Vol. 2

Gregg, W.W., 1992: Analysis of Orbit Selection for SeaWiFS:

Ascending vs. Descending Node. NASA Tech. Memo.

104566, Vol. 2, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 16 pp.

Vol. 3

McClain, C.R., W.E. Esaias, W. Barnes, B. Guenther, D. Endres, S. Hooker, G. Mitchell, and R. Barnes, 1992: Calibration and Validation Plan for SeaWiFS. NASA Tech.

Memo. 104566, Vol. 3, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone,

Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,

Maryland, 41 pp.

Vol. 4

McClain, C.R., E. Yeh, and G. Fu, 1992: An Analysis of GAC

Sampling Algorithms: A Case Study. NASA Tech. Memo.

104566, Vol. 4, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 22 pp., plus color plates.

Vol. 5

Mueller, J.L., and R.W. Austin, 1992: Ocean Optics Protocols. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 5, S.B. Hooker and

E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,

Greenbelt, Maryland, 43 pp.

Vol. 6

Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker, 1992: SeaWiFS Technical

Report Series Summary Index: Volumes 1–5. NASA Tech.

Memo. 104566, Vol. 6, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone,

Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,

Maryland, 9 pp.

Vol. 7

Darzi, M., 1992: Cloud Screening for Polar Orbiting Visible

and IR Satellite Sensors. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol.

7, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 7 pp.

Vol. 8

Hooker, S.B., W.E. Esaias, and L.A. Rexrode, 1993: Proceedings of the First SeaWiFS Science Team Meeting. NASA

Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 8, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 61 pp.

Vol. 9

Gregg, W.W., F.C. Chen, A.L. Mezaache, J.D. Chen, J.A.

Whiting, 1993: The Simulated SeaWiFS Data Set, Version 1. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 9, S.B. Hooker

and E.R. Firestone, and A.W. Indest, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 17 pp.

Vol. 10

Woodward, R.H., R.A. Barnes, C.R. McClain, W.E. Esaias,

W.L. Barnes, and A.T. Mecherikunnel, 1993: Modeling of

the SeaWiFS Solar and Lunar Observations. NASA Tech.

Memo. 104566, Vol. 10, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone,

Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,

Maryland, 26 pp.

Vol. 11

Patt, F.S., C.M. Hoisington, W.W. Gregg, and P.L. Coronado,

1993: Analysis of Selected Orbit Propagation Models for

the SeaWiFS Mission. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol.

11, S.B. Hooker, E.R. Firestone, and A.W. Indest, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 16 pp.

Vol. 12

Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker, 1993: SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Summary Index: Volumes 1–11. NASA Tech.

Memo. 104566, Vol. 12, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone,

Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,

Maryland, 28 pp.

Vol. 13

McClain, C.R., K.R. Arrigo, J. Comiso, R. Fraser, M. Darzi,

J.K. Firestone, B. Schieber, E-n. Yeh, and C.W. Sullivan, 1994: Case Studies for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 1. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 13,

S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 52 pp., plus

color plates.

Vol. 14

Mueller, J.L., 1993: The First SeaWiFS Intercalibration RoundRobin Experiment, SIRREX-1, July 1992. NASA Tech.

Memo. 104566, Vol. 14, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone,

Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,

Maryland, 60 pp.

Vol. 15

Gregg, W.W., F.S. Patt, R.H. Woodward, 1994: The Simulated SeaWiFS Data Set, Version 2. NASA Tech. Memo.

104566, Vol. 15, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds.,

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 42 pp., plus color plates.

Vol. 16

Mueller, J.L., B.C. Johnson, C.L. Cromer, J.W. Cooper, J.T.

McLean, S.B. Hooker, and T.L. Westphal, 1994: The Second SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin Experiment,

SIRREX-2, June 1993. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol.

16, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 121 pp.

Vol. 17

Abbott, M.R., O.B. Brown, H.R. Gordon, K.L. Carder, R.E.

Evans, F.E. Muller-Karger, and W.E. Esaias, 1994: Ocean

color in the 21st century: a strategy for a 20-year time

series. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 17, S.B. Hooker

and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight

Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 20 pp.

Vol. 18

Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker, 1995: SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Summary Index: Volumes 1–17. NASA Tech.

Memo. 104566, Vol. 18, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone,

Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,

Maryland, 46 pages.

35
SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23

Vol. 19

McClain, C.R., R.S. Fraser, J.T. McLean, M. Darzi, J.K. Firestone, F.S. Patt, B.D. Schieber, R.H. Woodward, E-n. Yeh,

S. Mattoo, S.F. Biggar, P.N. Slater, K.J. Thome, A.W.

Holmes, R.A. Barnes, and K.J. Voss, 1994: Case Studies

for SeaWiFS Calibration and Validation, Part 2. NASA

Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 19, S.B. Hooker, E.R. Firestone,

and J.G. Acker, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,

Greenbelt, Maryland, 73 pp.

Vol. 20

Hooker, S.B., C.R. McClain, J.K. Firestone, T.L. Westphal,

E-n. Yeh, and Y. Ge, 1994: The SeaWiFS Bio-Optical

Archive and Storage System (SeaBASS), Part 1. NASA

Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 20, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 40 pp.

Vol. 21

Acker, J.G., 1994: The Heritage of SeaWiFS: A Retrospective on the CZCS NIMBUS Experiment Team (NET) Program. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 21, S.B. Hooker

and E.R. Firestone, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight

Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 43 pp.

Vol. 22

Barnes, R.A., W.L. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, and C.R. McClain,

1994: Prelaunch Acceptance Report for the SeaWiFS Radiometer. NASA Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 22, S.B. Hooker, E.R. Firestone, and J.G. Acker, Eds., NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 32 pp.

Vol. 23

Barnes, R.A., A.W. Holmes, W.L. Barnes, W.E. Esaias, C.R.

McClain, and T. Svitek, 1994: SeaWiFS Prelaunch Radiometric Calibration and Spectral Characterization. NASA

Tech. Memo. 104566, Vol. 23, S.B. Hooker, E.R. Firestone,

and J.G. Acker, Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,

Greenbelt, Maryland, 55 pp.

Vol. 24

Firestone, E.R., and S.B. Hooker, 1995: SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Summary Index: Volumes 1–23. NASA Tech.

Memo. 104566, Vol. 24, S.B. Hooker and E.R. Firestone,

Eds., NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt,

Maryland, 36 pp.

36
 Form Approved

 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering

 and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of

 information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite

 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.

 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS

Laboratory for Hydrospheric Processes

Goddard Space Flight Center 95B00092

Greenbelt, Maryland 20771

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING

 AGENCY REPORT NUMBER

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Washington, D.C. 20546–0001 TM–104566, Vol. 24

11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)

14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES

 16. PRICE CODE

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT

 OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION

 REPORT NUMBER

Unclassified–Unlimited

Subject Category 48

 -

SeaWiFS, Oceanography, Cumulative, Index, Summary, Overview, Errata, Addendum, 36

Glossary, Symbols, References, Bio-optical, Algorithm Workshop, Protocols Subgroup

Workshop

Report is available from the Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI),

7121 Standard Drive, Hanover, MD 21076–1320; (301)621-0390

 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188

 SeaWiFS Technical Report Series

Volume 24–SeaWiFS Technical Report Series Cumulative Index: Volumes 1–23 Code 970.2

 June 1995 Technical Memorandum

6. AUTHOR(S)

 Elaine R. Firestone and Stanford B. Hooker

 Series Editors: Stanford B. Hooker and Elaine R. Firestone

 Elaine R. Firestone: General Sciences Corporation, Laurel, Maryland

The Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) is the follow-on ocean color instrument to the Coastal Zone Color

Scanner (CZCS), which ceased operations in 1986, after an eight-year mission. SeaWiFS is expected to be launched in 1995,

on the SeaStar satellite, being built by Orbital Sciences Corporation (OSC). The SeaWiFS Project at the National Aeronautics

and Space Administration's (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), has undertaken the responsibility of documenting

all aspects of this mission, which is critical to the ocean color and marine science communities. This documentation, entitled

the SeaWiFS Technical Report Series, is in the form of NASA Technical Memorandum Number 104566. All reports published

are volumes within the series. This particular volume serves as a reference, or guidebook, to the previous 23 volumes and

consists of 6 sections including: an errata, an addendum (summaries of various SeaWiFS Working Group Bio-optical Algorithm and Protocols Subgroups Workshops, and other auxiliary information), an index to key words and phrases, a list of all

references cited, and lists of acronyms and symbols used. It is the editors' intention to publish a cumulative index of this type

after every five volumes in the series. Each index covers the topics published in all previous editions, that is, each new index

will include all of the information contained in the preceeding indices.

NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)

 Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18, 298-102

 Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified Unlimited