alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1781.2 Policy. ( a ) Rural Utilities Service (RUS), is an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture established pursuant to section 232 of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-354, 108 Stat. 3178). Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), is an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture established pursuant to section 232 of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-354, 108 Stat. 3178), successor to the Soil Conservation Service. RUS will make WS and RCD loans available to sponsoring local public bodies, agencies, and nonprofit organizations to assist them in obtaining the local cost of WS works of improvement and RCD measures. Any processing or servicing activity conducted pursuant to this part involving authorized assistance to RUS employees, members of their families, known close relatives, or business or close personal associates, is subject to the provisions of subpart D of part 1900 of this title. Applicants for this assistance are required to identify any known relationship or association with an RUS employee. RUS will assist the local sponsors and the NRCS in making loans from NRCS construction funds as WS advances when needed for the development of future water supplies or for site preservation.
( b ) Rural Development State and local offices will administer these programs on behalf of RUS and will coordinate application processing with the NRCS and other appropriate State and Federal agencies.
[62 FR 33500, June 19, 1997, as amended at 80 FR 9864, Feb. 24, 2015]
Docket Management System 

400 7th Street SW, Plaza 401 

Washington, DC 20590-0001 

Re: Exemption 8118, Docket Number FM-2003-15439 

Ladies/Gentlemen: 

In accordance with Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14CFR) § 11 .61, United Parcel Service 

(UPS), Operating Certificate IPXA097B, petitions the Administrator for an extension of Exemption No. 

8118, Docket FM-2003-15439. This exemption was originally granted on August 26, 2003. Extensions 

were granted on August 17, 2005, June 22, 2007, August 31 , 2009, June 7, 2011 and July 11, 2013. 

The current extension is scheduled to expire on August 31, 2015. 

Exemption No. 8118 provides relief to the extent necessary permitting UPS to substitute a qualified and 

authorized check airman or aircrew program designee for an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot 

in command (PIC) who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in 121.424(1 )(ii). 

The conditions and circumstances, in regard to public interest and equivalent levels of safety, which 

warranted the original grant of exemption, continue to exist. This petition does not seek to change the 

conditions and limitations of the current exemption. This exemption is not a compromiser of safety. 

The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. For this reason, and the reasons stated 

above, UPS requests that a finding of good cause be made for waiving publication in the Federal 

Register (14 CFR §11 .87). Granting the requested relief will set no precedents. The existence of the 

exemption is well known and widely accepted. 

A summary of this petition as required by 14 CFR § 11.25 is attached. 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact either myself or Andrew 

Newcomer, UPS Flight Operations Compliance, at (502) 395-5713 or anewcomer@ups.com . 

Sincerely, 

Christopher A. Williams 

Director of Operations 

Attachment 

cc: Mr. Larry A. Ortkiese I SPOI ACE-LOU-UPS-CM0-25 

Mr. William H. King I APOI ACE-LOU-UPS-CM0-25 
121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and landing, subject · 

to certain conditions and limitations.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIndependent Orbiter Assessment (IOA): Analysis of the electrical power distribution and control/remote manipulator system subsystemThe results of the Independent Orbiter Assessment (IOA) of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Critical Items List (CIL) are presented. The IOA approach features a top-down analysis of the Electrical Power Distribution and Control (EPD and C)/Remote Manipulator System (RMS) hardware to determine failure modes, criticality, and potential critical items. To preserve independence, this analysis was accomplished without reliance upon the results contained in the NASA FMEA/CIL documentation. This report documents the results of the independent analysis of the EPD and C/RMS (both port and starboard) hardware. The EPD and C/RMS subsystem hardware provides the electrical power and power control circuitry required to safely deploy, operate, control, and stow or guillotine and jettison two (one port and one starboard) RMSs. The EPD and C/RMS subsystem is subdivided into the four following functional divisions: Remote Manipulator Arm; Manipulator Deploy Control; Manipulator Latch Control; Manipulator Arm Shoulder Jettison; and Retention Arm Jettison. The IOA analysis process utilized available EPD and C/RMS hardware drawings and schematics for defining hardware assemblies, components, and hardware items. Each level of hardware was evaluated and analyzed for possible failure modes and effects. Criticality was assigned based on the severity of the effect for each failure mode.Document ID19900001620Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRobinson, W. W.*(McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 17, 1987Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:185526NASA-CR-185526REPT-1.0-WP-VA86001-26Accession Number90N10936Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17650Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900001620.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3452

_____________________________ C ARL B LACKMON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Es cambia County

. W. Joel Boles , Judge

. November 15, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R AY , K ELSEY , and J AY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

______ _______________________2 Carl Blackmon, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Research Frontiers Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Seth L. Van Voorhees, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Seth L. Van Voorhees Seth L. Van Voorhees Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
March 11, 2011




---
#### Smith *vs.*McGlasson.

Motion. Case 38

Error to the Campbell Circuit; H. O. Brown, Judge

*Bervice of Process. Pleading.*

Service of writ on party convicted felon valid, H. Dig. 1223.

If any extraneous fact to render service of a writ illegal, it should he pleaded, so that its truth might bo Cried.

*iDenny,*for plaintiff; *Haggin,*for defendant.

April 7.

Chief Justice Robers ton,

delivered (he Opinion of the Court.

Smith, having declared against Mc-Glasson for trespass, and the Writ having been executed, August 6th, 1829 — afterwards, at the April term, 1830, of the circuit court, the parties having appeared by their attorneys, the court, on motion made‘by the defendant, dismissed the suit: because, as appeared by theexhibition of a copy of the record of conviction, lie had been convicted, July 31st, 1829, of felony, and *slated,*that, when, the writ was. executed, he was in the custody of the sheriff, as a convict.

The authority for the judgment of the circuit court is not perceived. McGlasson was .as subject *afier*conviction as before, to a civil suit; and the notificatien (by the service of *the*writ) of the suit against him, was as effectual as it would have been if he had never been convicted. Such should be ■deemed to be the object and effect of the 5th section of an act of 1802. II. Digt. ir““

But if any extraneous fact existed, which rendered the writ, or the service of it, illegal, or which could have the effect of abating it, such fact should have been pleaded, so that an issue as to its truth might have been made tip and properly tried.

The plaintiff objected to the *motion, and-to the*•dismission of the suit by the court — and it does not appear that the judgment is sustained by any thing ■in the record.

Wherefore, the judgment of circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded.
#### SHEFTS, Respondent, v. OTTENS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by William Shefts against Annie Ottens.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1882 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1882

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to prohibit the Department 
of Agriculture from entering into partnerships with foreign governments 
to promote enrollment in the supplemental nutrition assistance program 
   and to terminate the current Partnership for Nutrition Assistance 
            Initiative between the United States and Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2013

  Mrs. Black introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign 
Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to prohibit the Department 
of Agriculture from entering into partnerships with foreign governments 
to promote enrollment in the supplemental nutrition assistance program 
   and to terminate the current Partnership for Nutrition Assistance 
            Initiative between the United States and Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safety Net Abuse Prevention (SNAP) 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS AUTHORIZED TO BE 
              APPROPRIATED UNDER FOOD AND NUTRITION ACT OF 2008.

    (a) Prohibition on Promotion Agreements With Foreign Governments.--
Section 18 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2027) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Funds appropriated pursuant to any authorization of 
appropriations in this Act may not be used by the Secretary for any 
agreement with a foreign government intended to promote enrollment in 
the program and the availability of program benefits.''.
    (b) Termination of Existing Agreement.--Effective on the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the memorandum of understanding entered into 
on July 22, 2004, by the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States 
Department of Agriculture and the Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the 
Republic of Mexico and known as the ``Partnership for Nutrition 
Assistance Initiative'' is null and void.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


         /s/ Richard Rappaport
         --------------------------------------
         Richard Rappaport
         President (Principal Executive Officer)


         /s/ Anthony C. Pintsopoulos
         --------------------------------------
         Anthony C. Pintsopoulos
         Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

September 22, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SRKP 2, Inc. and will be retained by SRKP 2, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 160.68 Collection of fees.

Beginning October 1, 1981, all fees and charges assessed to interested parties for services rendered under the Naval Stores Act shall be collected by the Director, Tobacco Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, to cover insofar as practicable, all costs of providing such services. Such fees shall be credited to the Division in accordance with fiscal regulations of the Department.

[47 FR 3345, Jan. 25, 1982]
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1470.28 Grassland conservation initiative contracts. ( a ) The purpose of the grassland conservation initiative (GCI) is to assist producers in protecting grazing uses, conserving and improving soil, water, and wildlife resources, and achieving related conservation values by conserving eligible land through grassland conservation contracts.
( b ) The GCI is applicable on eligible cropland for which base acres have been maintained by the FSA under section 1112(d)(3) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9012(d)(3)).
( c ) Producers with eligible land will have one-time election to enroll in the GCI during fiscal years 2019 through 2023. A producer may elect to enroll eligible acres in the GCI or under a general CSP contract. A producer with land eligible for the GCI may not have the same land enrolled under both a GCI and general CSP contract at the same time.
( d ) Participants enrolled in the GCI must agree to meet or exceed the stewardship threshold for at least one priority resource concern before the end of the contract.
( e ) A GCI plan shall: ( 1 ) Encompass all enrolled land;
( 2 ) Require adoption of conservation activities to address grassland resource concerns; and
( 3 ) If crops are grown, require adoption of conservation activities that achieve conservation stewardship levels analogous to the land being planted or maintained in grass.
( f ) The GCI contract will be for one 5-year term and will not be subject to renewal.
( g ) GCI annual payments will be $18 per acre, not to exceed the acres enrolled in the GCI contract. ( 1 ) GCI contracts are not subject to the payment limitations or contract limits provided in § 1470.24(f) and (g).
( 2 ) GCI contracts are not eligible for supplemental payments as provided in § 1470.24(b).
( h ) The participant may request to terminate their GCI contract at any time and retain payments already received under the contract.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Kirby D. Cochran certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Castle Arch Real Estate Investment Company, L.L.C.



2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Kirby D. Cochran

Kirby D. Cochran, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

August 15, 2005
Order entered April 2 2 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00019

- CR

VICTORIA STUART, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F

- 1062404

- I



### O RDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any

other reason.

 The trial court shall first d etermine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute th e appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determ ine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the repo rter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact,
any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS o f the date

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal
shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.1








STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of China Runji Cement Inc.
for the three  and nine months ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shouren
Zhao, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:








·
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





·
            information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our
      financial condition and results of
operations.








/s/ Shouren
Zhao


Shouren
Zhao


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer








July 11,
2008








This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.