alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1717.658 Records, reports and audits. ( a ) Every borrower shall maintain accurate records concerning all investments, loans and guarantees made by it. Such records shall be kept in a manner that will enable RUS to readily determine: ( 1 ) The nature and source of all income, expenses and losses generated from the borrower's loans, guarantees and investments;
( 2 ) The location, identity and lien priority of any loan collateral resulting from activities permitted by this subpart; and
( 3 ) The effects, if any, which such activities may have on the feasibility of loans made, guaranteed or lien accommodated by RUS.
( b ) In determining the aggregate amount of investments, loans and guarantees made by a borrower, the borrower shall use the recorded value of each investment, loan or guarantee as reflected on its books and records for the next preceding end-of-month, except for the end-of-year report which shall be based on December 31 information. Every borrower shall also report annually to RUS, in the manner and on the form specified by the Administrator, the current status of each investment, outstanding loan and outstanding guarantee which it has made pursuant to this subpart.
( c ) The records of borrowers shall be subject to the auditing procedures prescribed in part 1773 of this chapter. RUS reserves the right to review the financial records of any subsidiaries of the borrower to determine if the borrower is in compliance with this subpart, and to ascertain if the debts, guarantees (as defined in this subpart), or other obligations of the subsidiaries could adversely affect the ability of the borrower to repay its debts to the Government.
( d ) RUS will monitor borrower compliance with this subpart based primarily on the annual financial and statistical report submitted by the borrower to RUS and the annual auditor's report on the borrower's operations. However, RUS may inspect the borrower's records at any time during the year to determine borrower compliance. If a borrower's most recent annual financial and statistical report shows the aggregate of the borrower's investments, loans and guarantees to be below the 15 percent level, that in no way relieves the borrower of its obligation to comply with its RUS mortgage, RUS loan contract, and this subpart with respect to Administrator approval of any additional investment, loan or guarantee that would cause the aggregate to exceed the 15 percent level.
C(\USfc. Ub. W-lVtoSeo-CR* LkteWbA\^K-EMie •3^X«e;s^^^^^^:'.^wcw^APP^ THE COURT OF V. $£ MAR 112015 cmiWM KPPEC*_s TttE. *ST&,T&
.QF TE>kKS £ Of TExkP-EDIN 

## AbelAcosta,Clerk ^TOFCRIMINALAPPEAl Pft.o S£ NAoT\OKi R>«\ (LxT&kA*s\om or TihMAR 112015 TO FlU- PET\T\ON\ PO»L ft\SC\lE.TtON ^^ \1EV lEW AbelAcosta,Clerk To THE V\o^oa^a^£ CouaT e>F G.&\m\m*a. M*PE.fcLV. 

### rxumbece<^ eau«S£ cu\c\ CtSpecAGUM^ monies +V\\i> Wocvora.me 

### ccaar\.-V« «.x+ervdi +Ke 4n(v\e &r Pv'Ua<^ -VV\e appeAVcuvVs p^Vi-Viurv 

### UKsuAcl sYmxo +ke COUCV VW $>Uqu}\cv^'. I. T\\€ SV^\e O/vd AU«"\Vv^jC oP "VW\> CLO^\k*><L \rv.-We touc4 ts/T app^.cV*s \*>i Loik«txNd<r\G.V. EL<xr\ laccV*^ v. TV\e SVevV*. o-C* Ttxa* * ap£«&A r\o. m-iVoo^oo-ca. 

### ••-.•; 2, TKe "5^W c*\^ rwjuwVver ts£ -VKs case \r\AV "W>q\ CtiUirA.; i's-'.- TKe
."SAoA* oP Te*cxs V. LaWvtdftdc ExxrV 3o.toh5 cau-s* rso. ISl^^WU &o<w VW Vi<k-Wv ftteV\cA Couc* ' of"Warp's


### uPPwse. oP CapCVaA Pr\urdier>

St The eorwnG/V>D<\ was Q^a^a \<s 4-kV Ceuu-v

### (c. TV\* cAec\aVvf\e ft>rr*¥vUrt^ \\\% afjp\vccM\\v*i peA\V\o^ &>«• cXt*scre.-V(ofscvfvA r«.\/v«.vo C«\ ArhH Cams* ~\«» r<\<xf<L\\ V^.^-OVS,
dau^ ">fi cecuxe«*Ve.A VKaA uiauAd <v\alc€ VKc du.« dak :3i>o«\^t3ms $V Mo pr»ur request V\)t or\ eTcV«r\^o<N o-P \\rc\a. H^s betr\ rtsccde * 

### ^. TKe Ve^S ceAveci AA.por\ Vo *s\\uo cxood cause fur W\£ reouesAed exA-^siivn. are as ftoWoui^.t 7T\\e appeWa^* / p<2_V>Vbjve-r ojq^ r€.pires^\\edi h\x Coucc\ apposed course\ 

### dafiMj appeaA aP A-K\s case V& -Wive Fv>ock£*vW\ Ct>uA of ftrpp&.l'S a?W AW CorvvOcA:ii'o<\ UJaS aPPvcnr>e<Jl
. Tk<*. TfvaV CjLiur\ CeVuSec) 

### hs appoint Cjowns«.V V» PvW a peAvV\0(\ Pir c^v^cteAvooasv^ CevKe*o. 

### TV\^rc(or«.) addi-V\o<\oA V\tf\.e vs r>«.ed«c)i P»<- -VK« appeWcavV K 

### e.C-W\«- prepare, arsck PvW -VW peA\\U* ProSe of seefc IcoclA
WKe.c«Wtj Pre.cr\'t<ie<i £ic\<ivde£ed >-VK<2 <Appellar\\ Ipe+C4no«ver 

### C^'^pecA&AAV'A reau.es4 -VKcl\ "VK\S U«<\oraAa\*-.CouxV /:e*Wy©\ Time;

### presetU\^ \r\carecLfdW cx\ \\\z. ^crcv^TcYQjfdi UicviV , Tna-\0 oA W^uj\€. Qou*v\\yT«.xq"S x v/ec-cvl^ or\d. d«tc\acc u^dcr VKe 

### p^al-Vv^ uP pec]\xr\^ > -VKaA We Q»r€c^oif\^ ^VaA^rrv€nV<> axe 

### Ex-ectx^ ga V\\\s LAV\ da^ oP ft\occk ,00VS.

f%rVil,rrvW fs0 Sg ru>r p 

## The AppeA\ar\\/ PcVvVxorse^ WfeV>v^ ceAvP\*es VWxA 5Wt ^o 4-Wc oPCVcul dP C.Piy\Cr\ai duvWVcA aAWae^ 0>c 4-Wrv<i (1oua"V»oi orveX rwcuWcL v/'ra LX."S. Of\cLv\ W 4-Ke 9WW (ifOSecuArOrva

LAK dctu oP (TWqX Aox'b,
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Datawatch Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kenneth
P. Bero, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










/s/ Kenneth P. Bero
              Kenneth
      P. Bero
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              December
      21,2009
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**The undersigned officer of **Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.**hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to such officer’s knowledge that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc. for the quarterended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.Date: November 10, 2006         By: /s/ David Shaw           Name: David Shaw    Title: Chief Executive Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2





PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly report
of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Ginsberg, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date:
November 6, 2009





/s/
Alan Ginsberg


Alan
Ginsberg


Principal
Financial Officer
§ 15b.31 Treatment of students. ( a ) *General.* No qualified handicapped student shall, on the basis of handicap, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any academic, research, occupational training, housing, health, insurance, counseling, financial aid, physical education, athletics, recreation, transportation, other extracurricular, other postsecondary education aid, benefits, or services to which this subpart applies.
( b ) A recipient to which this subpart applies that considers participation by students in education programs or activities not operated wholly by the recipient as part of, or equivalent to, an education program or activity operated by the recipient shall assure itself that the other education program or activity, as a whole, provides an equal opportunity for the participation of qualified handicapped persons.
( c ) A recipient to which this subpart applies may not, on the basis of handicap, exclude any qualified handicapped student from any course, course of study, or other part of its education program or activity.
( d ) A recipient to which this subpart applies shall operate its programs or activities in the most integrated setting appropriate.
[47 FR 25470, June 11, 1982, as amended at 68 FR 51343, Aug. 26, 2003]
1] ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0063 

JOE LEE, 

Plaintiff and Appellant, 

v. 

DEAN SKINNER, 

Defendant and Appellee. 

CHRIS SKINNER, 

Defendant. 

F" 

APR 1 1 2023 

BOW 11 G 'ood 

clew, ct s,: Trc,r, :.3 court 

state of montane 

ORDER 

Appellant Joe Lees has filed a motion for extension of time to file his opening brief. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant has until May 11, 2023, to file his 

opening brief. 

No further extensions will be granted unless Appellant notifies the Court that 

Appellee's counsel has been contacted concerning the motion and whether there is an 

objection to the motion. 

The Clerk is directed to obtain any late filings that were not provided with the 

District Court record. 

DATED this L r day of April, 2023. 

For the Court, 

Chief Justice 

04/11/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0063
§ 1776.12 Use of DWS Grant proceeds. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in the next paragraph. The DWS grant process shall be used solely for the purpose of providing loans to eligible individuals for the construction, refurbishing, and servicing of individual decentralized water systems in rural areas that are or will be owned by the eligible individuals.
( b ) A grant recipient may use DWS grant funds to pay administrative expenses associated with providing the assistance described in the immediately preceding paragraph.
( c ) A grant recipient may not use grant funds in any manner inconsistent with the terms of the grant agreement.
( d ) In the event of ground well water contamination, the Secretary shall allow a loan or subgrant to be made with grant funds under this section for the installation of water treatment where needed beyond the point of entry, with or without the installation of a new water well system.
( e ) Any entities responsible for fouling a drinking water supply are not eligible to be the recipients of an award for this program.
[70 FR 28788, May 19, 2005, as amended at 85 FR 23211, Apr. 27, 2020]
§ 1786.157 Approval of applications. ( a ) Ordinarily, within 30 days of receipt, an application will be reviewed and the borrower will be notified as to whether the application has been approved. If the application has not been approved, the borrower will be informed as to the reasons. If the application is approved the borrower shall thereafter be provided with a prepayment agreement for execution.
( b ) The Administrator may limit the number of applications approved and closings scheduled from time to time, taking into account, among other matters, administrative considerations of the RUS.
#### § 1717.153 Transitional assistance.

RUS recognizes that short-term financial stresses can follow even the most beneficial mergers. To help stabilize electric rates, enhance the credit quality of outstanding loans made or guaranteed by the Government, and otherwise ease the transition period before the long-term efficiencies and economies of a merger can be realized, RUS may approve one or more types of transitional assistance to a successor under the conditions set forth in this part.
#### § 1774.1 General.

The purpose of the Special Evaluation Assistance for Rural Communities and Household (SEARCH) Grant program is to provide financial assistance to the neediest, eligible communities, who lack financial resources to pay for feasibility studies, design assistance and technical assistance. This subpart sets forth the general policies and procedures for making and processing predevelopment planning SEARCH grants for water and waste projects.
#### Smith's Executors *vs.*Bryant’s Executors.

OHARffERY. Case 126.

Error to the Garrard Circuit; Bridges, Judge.

*Chancery practice. Revivor.*

In chancery oaiiics (ho record should shew every thing n cessary to sustain the decree.

Order *to*revive in name of an executor, without stating that it was at his instance, the record not shewing that he had notice eamvt support a decree against him.

*Owsley,*for plaintiffs ; Crittenden,- for defendants.

May 12.

Judge Underwood

delivered the opinion ol toe Court.

'1 HE rule m chancery causes is, that the record must shew *every*thing necessary to sustain the decree. Upon Smith’s death, regularly, the suit should have been revived by bill ol revivor in the name of the executor. Instead of doing so, an order to this effect was entered : u ordered, on motion, that this suit be revived, and prosecuted in the name of Isaac M. Myers, executor &c.”

It no where appears who made the motion, nor is there any thing in the record shewing that Myers thereatter had notice of the existence of the order, li the defendant caused the entry to be made, and the executor of Smith had no knowledge of-it, all. subsequent proceedings were *ex parte,*and the decree ought not to be sustained, because it would bar layers, il he be executor, so long as it remains in force.

As the order does not appear to have been made on the motion of Myers, we think it too vague and uncertain to permit the decree to stand.

Wherefore, it is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for a regular revivor of the suit in the circuit court, or for an abatement thereof by the death of Smith.
#### Thomas *v.*The State.

*Indictment for Grand larceny.*

1. *«S'ettimj aside siibmission,for amendment of bill of exceptions.*— When a criminal case has been regularly submitted, the submission will *60not be set aside on motion, in order to enable the appellant to correct or amend the bill of exceptions, when the amendment, if made and allowed, would not have entitled him to the general charge on the evidence, the refusal of which is the only matter excepted to and presented for revision.

From the Circuit Court of Butler.

Tried before the Hou. John P. FIurbard.

The defendant in this case was indicted for the larceny of a mule, was convicted, and sentenced to the penitentiary for the term of four years. The bill of exceptions purports to set out all the evidence introduced on the trial, and shows that the only exception reserved by the defendant was to the refusal of the general charge, asked by him in writing. After the submission of the case in this court, the defendant entered a motion to set aside the submission, in order to give him an opportunity to amend the bill of exceptions, by correcting its statements as to the testimony of witnesses tending to identity the mule. The following opinion was delivered in response to the motion.

Jno. Gindrat Winter, for appellant.

Wm. L. Martin, Attorney-General, for the State.

CLOPTON, J.

This 'cause was submitted December 18, 1890. Appellant subsequently moved to set aside the submission, in order to allow him an opportunity to move to correct the bill of exceptions. We will not pass upon the sufficiency óf the showing to set aside the submission for the purpose mentioned. If the bill of exceptions were corrected, by striking out the portions which appellant insists are improperly inserted, and incorporating in lieu thereof the evidence as he states it was given on the trial, it is evident that the testimony, which would be shown by the bill of exceptions as thus corrected, would be of such character as to dis-entitle appellant to the general affirmative charge, the refusal to give which is the only error complained of. Setting aside the submission, and correcting the bill of exceptions, would not avail a reversal of the judgment.

The motion is overruled, and judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code**

 

            I, Robert M. Qualls, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of PRP-GP LLC, which is the Administrative Managing General Partner of PhosphateResource Partners Limited Partnership ("PLP"), and in that capacity also the chief financial officer of PLP, certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2003 of PLP fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PLP.

 

March 12, 2004

 

     Robert M.Qualls           Robert M. Qualls

****

*Return to PhosphateResource Partners Limited Partnership Form 10-K*

****
#### Walter W. McDANIEL, Claimant-Appellee, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 2007-7025.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 15, 2007.

Martin F. Hockey, Jr., Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent Appellant.

Allan T. Fenley, Fenley Law Offices, Schenectady, NY, for Claimant-Appellee.

RANDALL R. RADER, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves without opposition to stay proceedings in this appeal pending the court’s disposition of *Mlechick v. Nicholson,*2006-7362. The court considers whether the parties should be directed to respond concerning whether the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims should be summarily affirmed.

In *Mayfield v. Nicholson,*444 F.3d 1328, 1333 (Fed.Cir.2006), we held that:

> [T]he duty of affirmative notification [as to the evidence that is needed and who shall be responsible for providing it] is not satisfied by various post-decisional communications from which a claimant might have been able to infer what evidence the VA found lacking in the claimant’s presentation.... [S]ection 5103 requires the VCAA notification to be issued prior to the initial decision on the claim, not afterwards.

In the decision on appeal, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims remanded to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, determining that “the Board relied on decisional and post decisional documents to support its conclusion that VA had satisfied its duty-to-notify obligations.” It appears that the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims correctly determined that remand was required pursuant to *Mayfield.*

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to stay is held in abeyance.

*980(2) The parties are directed to respond concerning whether the decision of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims should be summarily affirmed.

(3) The briefing schedule is temporarily stayed.
§ 1734.11 Grant and loan termination. ( a ) The financial assistance may be terminated when RUS and the recipient agree upon the conditions of the termination, the effective date of the termination, and, in the case of a partial termination of the financial assistance, any unadvanced portion of the financial assistance to be terminated and any advanced portion of the financial assistance to be returned.
( b ) The recipient may terminate the financial assistance by written notification to RUS, providing the reasons for such termination, the effective date, and, in the case of a partial termination, the portion of the financial assistance to be terminated. In the case of a partial termination, if RUS believes that the remaining portion of the financial assistance will not accomplish the approved purposes, then RUS may terminate the financial assistance in its entirety, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cardiac Science Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael
K. Matysik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                             /s/ Michael K. Matysik
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Michael K. Matysik
                                             Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 10, 2006