alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1822.270 Technical, legal, and other services. ( a ) *Appraisals.* The property will be appraised by an RD employee authorized to make real estate appraisals. The appraisal will consist of a narrative statement prepared and signed by the authorized employee describing in detail the items considered in arriving at the value of the property. Two values will be established by the appraiser: ( 1 ) The fair market value of the total property “as is”.
( 2 ) The aggregate fair market value of the building sites after development. ( i ) In determining the value of the property, the appraiser will consider the value and selling prices of similar building sites in the area. The selling prices of similar sites must be fully documented.
( ii ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Title clearance and legal services.* For a loan to a public nonprofit organization, title clearance and legal services will be obtained in accordance with instructions from the OGC, observing the provisions of subpart B of part 1927 of this chapter to the extent feasible. For a loan to a private nonprofit organization, the provisions of subpart B of part 1927 of this chapter regarding title clearance and legal services will apply. The applicant will be encouraged to have the same approved closing agent, where practical, perform the title clearance work in connection with the purchase of the land and the sale of the individual sites.
( c ) *Contracts for legal services.* On projects requiring more legal services than are customarily required for title clearance alone, the applicant will be required to have a written contract when loan funds will be used for legal services. All such contracts will be subject to review and approval by the State director and therefore should be submitted to the State Director before execution by the applicant. Contracts will provide for the types of service to be performed and the amount of fees to be paid either in lump sum on the completion of all services or in installments as services are performed.
( d ) *Engineering services.* On projects requiring engineering services, a written contract will be required between the engineer and the borrower. All such contracts will be subject to review and approval by the State director and therefore should be submitted to the State Director before execution by the applicant. The form of contract must conform with standard professional practices and describe the types of services to be performed and fees to be paid.
[35 FR 16087, July 1, 1970, as amended at 51 FR 6733, Feb. 26, 1986; 56 FR 67471, Dec. 31, 1991; 80 FR 9866, Feb. 24, 2015]
§ 1902.2 Policies concerning disbursement of funds. ( a ) Generally, loan and grant disbursements may be requested on an as needed basis, thereby reducing the need for supervised bank accounts. For all construction loans and those loans using multiple advances, only the actual amount to be disbursed at loan closing will be requested through the automated systems. Subsequent disbursements will be ordered as needed. However, supervised bank accounts may be used in certain circumstances. For example: ( 1 ) When a construction loan is made and the construction is substantially completed, but a small amount is being withheld pending completion of landscaping or some similar item. In this case, funds not disbursed may be placed in a supervised bank account for future disbursement as appropriate.
( 2 ) When a large number of checks will be issued in the construction of a dwelling or other development. In such cases, loan and grant disbursements will be requested in accordance with 7 CFR part 2018, subpart D as necessary, deposited in a supervised bank account, and disbursed as necessary to suppliers, sub-contractors, etc.
( 3 ) Association loan and grant funds made on a multiple advance basis may be deposited in a supervised bank account when required by State statutes or when determined necessary by the loan approval official.
( 4 ) Supervised bank accounts may be used when needed as defined in paragraph (a)(5) of this section to ensure the correct expenditures of all or a part of loan and grant funds, borrower contributions, and borrower income. Such accounts will be limited in amount and duration to the extent feasible through the prudent disbursement of funds and the prompt termination of the interests of Rural Development and other lenders when the accounts are no longer required.
( 5 ) When it is determined by the Servicing Official that special supervision is needed in the management of the borrower's finances, funds may be deposited in a supervised bank account. This supervisory technique will be used for a temporary period to help the borrower learn to properly manage his/her finances. Such a period will not exceed 1 year unless extended by the Servicing Official.
( b ) Program instructions provide information as to the type of note to be utilized and the method of handling advances and the interest accrued.
( c ) The debt instruments executed at the time of loan closing constitute an obligation on the part of the Government to disburse all funds at one time or in multiple advances, provided the funds are for purposes authorized by the Government at the time of loan closing. This obligatory commitment takes priority over any intervening liens or advances by other creditors, regardless of the provisions of the State laws involved.
[70 FR 59225, Oct. 12, 2005]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Ziff Davis Holdings Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark D.
Moyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        By: /s/ MARK D. MOYER
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                MARK D. MOYER
                                                CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


May 31, 2006



                                       4
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1429.102 Administration. ( a ) The Asparagus Revenue Market Loss Assistance Payment Program will be administered under the general supervision of the Executive Vice President, CCC (Administrator, Farm Service Administration (FSA)), or a designee, and will be carried out in the field by FSA State and county committees and FSA employees.
( b ) FSA State and county committees, and representatives and employees of those committees, do not have the authority to modify or waive any of the provisions of this part, except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section.
( c ) The FSA State committee will take any action required by this part that has not been taken by the FSA county committee. The FSA State committee will also: ( 1 ) Correct or require correction of an action taken by an FSA county committee that is not in compliance with this part; and
( 2 ) Require an FSA county committee to not take an action or implement a decision that is not in compliance with the regulations of this part.
( d ) No delegation in this part to an FSA State or county committee will preclude the Executive Vice President, CCC, or a designee, from determining any question for the Asparagus Revenue Marketing Loss Assistance Payment Program, or from reversing or modifying any determination made by a State or county committee.
( e ) The Deputy Administrator for Farm Programs, FSA, may authorize FSA State and county committees to waive or modify program requirements that are not statutory in cases where failure to meet such requirements does not adversely affect the operation of the Asparagus Revenue Market Loss Assistance Payment Program.
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

  Nevada

> - Las Vegas
- Reno

----
| Other State Department Archive Sites |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |
|                                      |
|                                      |
|                                      |
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1430.201 Administration. ( a ) This program is administered under the general supervision of the Executive Vice President, CCC, or a designee, and shall be carried out by Farm Service Agency (FSA) State and county committees and employees.
( b ) State and county committees, and their employees may not waive or modify any requirement of this subpart, except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section.
( c ) The State committee shall take any action required when not taken by the county committee, require correction of actions not in compliance, or require the withholding of any action that is not in compliance with this subpart.
( d ) The Executive Vice President, CCC, or a designee, may determine any question arising under the program or reverse or modify any decision of the State or county committee.
( e ) The Deputy Administrator, Farm Programs, FSA, may waive or modify program requirements where failure to meet such requirements does not adversely affect the operation of the Milk Income Loss Contract Program.
( f ) A representative of CCC may execute Milk Income Loss Contracts and related documents under the terms and conditions determined and announced by CCC. Any document not under such terms and conditions, including any purported execution before the date authorized by CCC, shall be null and void.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone InvestmentCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2008 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrentlyherewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Dated: November 4, 2008

 
| /s/ Mark Perrigo          |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Mark Perrigo              |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
#### §§ 1726.126-1726.149 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>              MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                          1,894
<SECURITIES>                   46,437
<RECEIVABLES>                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 50,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                          447
<OTHER-SE>                    (25,966)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   50,138
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    0
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,038
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (464)
<INCOME-TAX>                       55
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (519)
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                     (519)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.01)

        

</TABLE>
#### HARTMANN v. SCHNUGG et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 20, 1906.)

Action by George V. Hartmann against Francis J. Schnugg and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAirplane Upset Training Evaluation ReportAirplane upset accidents are a leading factor in hull losses and fatalities. This study compared five types of airplane-upset training. Each group was composed of eight, non-military pilots flying in their probationary year for airlines operating in the United States. The first group, 'No aero / no upset,' was made up of pilots without any airplane upset training or aerobatic flight experience; the second group, 'Aero/no upset,' of pilots without any airplane-upset training but with aerobatic experience; the third group, 'No aero/upset,' of pilots who had received airplane-upset training in both ground school and in the simulator; the fourth group, 'Aero/upset,' received the same training as Group Three but in addition had aerobatic flight experience; and the fifth group, 'In-flight' received in-flight airplane upset training using an instrumented in-flight simulator. Recovery performance indicated that clearly training works - specifically, all 40 pilots recovered from the windshear upset. However few pilots were trained or understood the use of bank to change the direction of the lift vector to recover from nose high upsets. Further, very few thought of, or used differential thrust to recover from rudder or aileron induced roll upsets. In addition, recovery from icing-induced stalls was inadequate.Document ID20020068969Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsGawron, Valerie J.*(Veridian Engineering, Inc. Buffalo, NY United States)*Jones, Patricia M.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 2002Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberRPT-FLTR-8590-0001-Y00NASA/CR-2002-211405NAS 1.26:211405Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS2-99070PROJECT: RTOP 728-20-30Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020068969.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 1709.201 Purpose.

This subpart establishes policies and procedures for the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) State Bulk Fuel Revolving Fund Grants. The purpose of this grant program is to assist State entities in establishing and supporting a revolving fund to provide a more cost-effective means of purchasing fuel for communities where the fuel cannot be shipped by means of surface transportation.
#### § 1780.40 [Reserved]
Appeal No. 79-354.

#### Ann Santelle *et al. v.*Miriam Hospital *et al.*

This case came before the court on March 4, 1980, on the defendants’ motion under Rule 16(g) to affirm the judgment below which dismissed the complaint for failure to file this action for wrongful death within two years after decedent’s death.

*921
      *Lynch 6- Coleman, John D. Lynch,*for plaintiffs, *Roberts, Carroll, Feldstein <b- Tucker, David W. Carroll, R. Kelly Sheridan, Jr., Hugh L. Moore, Jr., Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury 6- Parsons, Thomas D. Gidley,*for defendants.

After hearing arguments of counsel and considering plaintiffs’ brief, we are of the opinion that in a wrongful death action, the two year period within which the action must be brought constitutes a condition or limitation upon the created right itself and not merely a limitation affecting the remedy. The statute permits of no exception to this requirement. *Short*v. *Flynn,*118 R.I. 441, 374 A.2d 787 (1977); *Tillinghast*v. *Reed,*70 R.I. 259, 38 A.2d 782 (1944). Therefore, the motion to affirm the judgment below is hereby granted.
§ 1730.22 Borrower analysis. ( a ) Each borrower shall periodically analyze and document its security, operations and maintenance policies, practices, and procedures to determine if they are appropriate and if they are being followed. The records of inspections and tests are also to be reviewed and analyzed to identify any trends which could indicate deterioration in the physical or cyber condition or the operational effectiveness of the system or suggest a need for changes in security, operations or maintenance policies, practices and procedures. For portions of the borrower's system that are not operated by the borrower, if any, the borrower's written analysis would also include a review of the operator's performance under the operating agreement.
( b ) When a borrower's security, operations and maintenance policies, practices, and procedures are to be reviewed and evaluated by RUS, the borrower shall: ( 1 ) Conduct the analysis required by paragraph (a) of this section not more than 90 days prior to the scheduled RUS review;
( 2 ) Complete RUS Form 300, Review Rating Summary, and other related forms, prior to RUS' review and evaluation; and
( 3 ) Make available to RUS the borrower's completed RUS Form 300 (including a written explanation of the basis for each rating) and records related to the operations and maintenance of the borrower's system.
( c ) For those facilities not included on the RUS Form 300 (e.g., generating plants), the borrower shall prepare and complete an appropriate supplemental form for such facilities.
[63 FR 3450, Jan. 23, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 60541, Oct. 12, 2004]
EXHIBIT 32.1

The following statement is being made to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful misrepresentation.

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20549

Re: Coleman Cable, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(i) this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the period ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(ii) the information
contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coleman Cable, Inc.

Dated as of this 4th day of November 2010.



|                                                     |  |  |  |                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. Gary Yetman                                   |  |  |  | /s/ Richard N. Burger                                                                       
|G. Gary Yetman Chief Executive
Officer and President |  |  |  | Richard N. Burger Chief
Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Thomas J. Hollister, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Global GP LLC, the general partner of Global Partners LP, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010 of Global Partners LP;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 
| Dated:   January 20, 2011 | By     | /s/   Thomas J. Hollister                             |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Thomas   J. Hollister                                 |
|                      |   | Chief   Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                      |   | of   Global GP LLC, general partner                   |
|                      |   | of   Global Partners LP                               |

 

----
§ 1710.303 Power cost studies—power supply borrowers. ( a ) All applications for financing of additional generation capacity and the associated bulk transmission facilities shall be supported by a power cost study to demonstrate that the proposed generation and associated transmission facilities are the most economical and effective means of meeting the borrower's power requirements. This study usually is a separate study but it may be integrated with the financial forecast required by § 1710.302.
( b ) A power cost study shall include the following basic elements: ( 1 ) A study of all reasonably available self-generation, purchased-power, load management, and energy conservation alternatives as set forth in §§ 1710.253 and 1710.254;
( 2 ) A present-value analysis of the costs of the alternatives and their effects on total power costs, covering a period of at least 10 years beyond the projected in-service date of the facilities;
( 3 ) A description of proposed new power-purchase contracts or revisions to existing contracts, and an analysis of the effects on power costs;
( 4 ) Use of sensitivity analyses to determine the vulnerability of the alternatives to a reasonable range of assumptions about fuel costs, failure to achieve projected load growth, changes in operating and financing costs, and other major factors, if the financial forecast is used in support of a loan or loan guarantee that exceeds the smaller of $25 million or 10 percent of the borrower's total utility plant. Individual sensitivity analyses need not be duplicated if they have been included in other materials submitted to RUS; and
( 5 ) Assessment of the financial risks of the various alternatives, especially as between capital-intensive and non-capital-intensive alternatives, under the range of assumptions set forth in paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( c ) Power cost studies must use current, RUS-approved power requirements data, and all major assumptions are subject to RUS approval. Alternative assumptions about projected power requirements may be used, however, in conjunction with the sensitivity analyses required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0572-0032)
#### §§ 1700.110-1700.149 [Reserved]