alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1216.52 Programs, plans, and projects. ( a ) The Board shall receive and evaluate, or on its own initiative develop, and submit to the Secretary for approval any program, plan, or project authorized under this subpart. Such programs, plans, or projects shall provide for: ( 1 ) The establishment, issuance, effectuation, and administration of appropriate programs for promotion, research, and information, including producer and consumer information, with respect to peanuts; and
( 2 ) The establishment and conduct of research with respect to the use, nutritional value, sale, distribution, and marketing of peanuts and peanut products, and the creation of new products thereof, to the end that marketing and use of peanuts may be encouraged, expanded, improved, or made more acceptable and to advance the image, desirability, or quality of peanuts.
( b ) No program, plan, or project shall be implemented prior to its approval by the Secretary. Once a program, plan, or project is so approved, the Board shall take appropriate steps to implement it.
( c ) Each program, plan, or project implemented under this subpart shall be reviewed or evaluated periodically by the Board to ensure that it contributes to an effective program of promotion, research, or consumer information. If it is found by the Board that any such program, plan, or project does not contribute to an effective program of promotion, research, or consumer information, then the Board shall terminate such program, plan, or project.
( d ) No program, plan, or project shall make any false claims on behalf of peanuts or use unfair or deceptive acts or practices with respect to the quality, value, or use of any competing product. Peanuts of all domestic origins shall be treated equally.
#### §§ 1709.602-1709.999 [Reserved]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2003 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require the label 

of drugs intended for human use to contain a parenthetical statement 

identifying the source of any ingredient constituting or derived from 

a grain or starch-containing ingredient. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2013 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio (for himself and Mrs. LOWEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

require the label of drugs intended for human use to 

contain a parenthetical statement identifying the source 

of any ingredient constituting or derived from a grain 

or starch-containing ingredient. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gluten in Medicine 

5 Disclosure Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2003 IH

1 SEC. 2. LABELING OF SOURCE OF HUMAN DRUG INGREDI2 ENTS CONSTITUTING OR DERIVED FROM A 

3 GRAIN OR STARCH-CONTAINING INGRE4 DIENT. 

5 (a) MISBRANDING.—Section 502 of the Federal 

6 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 352) is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(bb) If it is a drug— 

9 ‘‘(1) that is intended for human use; 

10 ‘‘(2) that contains an ingredient (other than a 

11 polyol) that constitutes or is derived from a grain or 

12 starch-containing ingredient; and 

13 ‘‘(3) whose label fails to include a parenthetical 

14 statement identifying the source of the ingredient so 

15 constituted or derived.’’. 

16 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Section 502(bb) of the Federal 

17 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by subsection 

18 (a) of this section, shall apply beginning on the sooner 

19 of— 

20 (1) a date to be determined by the Secretary of 

21 Health and Human Services; and 

22 (2) the date that is 2 years after the date of the 

23 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David Zinberg, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bidz.com, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant ismade known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 12, 2007 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    | /s/ David Zinberg |   |
|                    | David Zinberg |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### § 1780.55 Preliminary engineering reports and environmental review documentation.

Preliminary engineering reports (PERs) must conform to customary professional standards. PER guidelines for water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and storm sewer are available from the Agency. Environmental review documentation must comply with the environmental review requirements in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970.

[81 FR 11028, Mar. 2, 2016]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1425.25 Appeals.

Parts 11 and 780 of this title apply to this part.

[67 FR 64459, Oct. 18, 2002]
#### § 1709.116 Application package.

The requirements for the application package will be established in the grant announcement. A complete application package will consist of the standard application for federal assistance (SF-424 series), as applicable, a narrative project proposal prepared in accordance with the grant announcement, an RUS environmental profile, and such other supporting documentation, forms, and certifications as required in the grant announcement and this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000792986
<NAME>                        Computer Power, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         68,519
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,608,846
<ALLOWANCES>                                   253,956
<INVENTORY>                                  1,538,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,385
<PP&E>                                       1,403,651
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,140,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,300,635
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,502,341
<BONDS>                                      1,732,854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,027
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,908,533)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,300,635
<SALES>                                     10,838,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,838,816
<CGS>                                        9,600,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,600,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,726,537
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             403,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,891,651)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,891,651)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,891,651)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.73)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jay Gray, Appellant.

by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, rendered October 31,1978, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Appeal dismissed. Defendant made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence (see *People v Williams,*36 NY2d 829; *People v Coscia,*56 AD2d 851). Cohalan, J. P., Hargett, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
98-1368.

#### Lakewood v. Hartman.

Cuyahoga App. No. 72622.

Douglas, Resnick and Cook, JJ., dissent.
Editorial Note on Part 1951
Editorial Notes: 1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1951.240 State Director's additional authorizations and guidance. ( a ) *Promote financing purposes and improve or maintain collectibility.* The State Director is authorized to perform the following functions when the action is determined likely to promote the loan or grant purposes without jeopardizing collectibility of the loan or imparing the adequacy of the security; will strengthen the security; or will facilitate, improve, or maintain the orderly collection of the loan: ( 1 ) Approve requests for permission to modify bylaws, articles of incorporation, or other rules and regulations of recipients, including changes in rate or fee schedules. Changes affecting the recipient's legal organizational structure must be approved by OGC.
( 2 ) Consent to requests by the recipient to incur additional indebtedness, subject to applicable Rural Development instructions and covenants in the loan or grant agreement.
( 3 ) Renew existing security instruments.
( 4 ) Approve the extension or expansion of facilities and services.
( 5 ) Require additional security when: ( i ) Existing security is inadequate and the loan or security instruments obligate the borrower to give additional security; or
( ii ) The loan is in default and additional security is acceptable in lieu of other servicing actions.
( 6 ) Release properties being sold by the borrower from mortgages securing Rural Renewal loans if the amount of the notes and mortgages given by the purchaser to the borrower equal the present market value and are assigned and pledged to Rural Development, and any money payable to the borrower is applied as an extra payment on the Rural Renewal loan.
( 7 ) Approve requests for rights-of-way and easements and any subordination necessary in connection with such requests.
( b ) *Referrals to National Office.* All proposed servicing actions which the State Director is not authorized by this subpart to approve will be referred to the National Office.
( c ) *Defeasance of Rural Development indebtedness.* Defeasance is the use of invested proceeds from a new bond issue to repay outstanding bonds in accordance with the repayment schedule of the outstanding bonds. The new issue supersedes the contractual agreements the borrower agreed to in the prior issue. Defeasance, or amending outstanding loan instruments and agreements to permit defeasance, of Rural Development debt instruments is not authorized, since defeasance limits, or eliminates entirely, the borrower's ability to comply with statutory refinancing requirements implemented by subpart F of part 1951 of this chapter.
#### Vanessa Derrell, an Infant, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Lucy Derrell, et al., Respondents, v Nassau County Medical Center et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 18, 1979, which (1) granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and (2) directed a trial on the issue of damages. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In this *res ipsa loquitur*case, plaintiffs’ proof, unrebutted by the defendants, is so convincing that the inferences arising therefrom, that defendants were negligent and the infant plaintiff was free from contributory negligence, are inescapable. Accordingly, the order granting summary judgment should be affirmed. (See *Horowitz v Kevah Konner, Inc.,*67 AD2d 38; *Richard Equip. Corp. v Manhattan Bid. Contr. Co.,*9 AD2d 691.) Mollen, P. J., Titone, Rabin, Gulotta and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
#### Douglas P. Hall, Conservator (Estate of Julie P. Revson) *v.*Town of Weston

*L. Paul Sullivan,*in support of the motion.

Submitted April 15

decided April 20, 1971

The plaintiff’s “Motion to the Supreme Court to Reconsider its Order of April 8, 1971, Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Review an Order Terminating a Stay of Execution” in the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is denied.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(No. 33-13793) and in the related Prospectus and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-103677,333-55556, 333-88295, and 333-15113) pertaining to various stock option andstock purchase plans of Candela Corporation of our report dated September 2,2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofCandela Corporation as of June 28, 2003 and for the year then endedincluded in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended July 2,2005.

 

 
|                    | /s/  Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                    |
|                    |
| Boston, Massachusetts   |
| September 23, 2005 |

 

----
#### SMITH, Appellant, v. LONG ISLAND R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15 1906.)

Action by Gertrude Smith, as administratrix of Harry A. Smith, deceased, against the Long Island Railroad Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

HOOKER, J., dissents.
### AITORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS

Mr. C. P. Lockhart, Chairman Board of InsuranceCotiissioners Austin, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. o-.4596 Re: Merger of Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company and Texas State Life InsuranceCompanyYou have submitted to us for approval certain documentsdesigned to effect a merger of the TeachersAnnuity Life InsuranceCompany and the Texas State Life InsuranceCompany. We refuse to approve said documents for the following reason: Article 5040,Vernon's Revised Civil Statutes, authorizes, under certain conditions, the consolidationor merger of two or more insurancecompanies "previouslyorganized under the laws of this State." In the opini~on of this Department, the privilege of consolidetin g or merging is extended only to insurance companies lawfully organized under the laws of Texas. In our opinionNo. O-4237, we advised you that real estate, encumbered or not, couldnot underArticle 4720 constitute the cap-ltal stock in whole or in part of a life insurance companyupon orl.ginalincorporation; that the capital stock of the company at that time must consist of “cash or securities"of the class inwhich such corporationsare authorizedby Article 4723 to invest their funds. At the time of the charteringand the issuanceof first certificate of authority to do business to the TeachersAnnuity Life Insurance Company, its capital stock consisted of mortgaged real estate. A suit by the State against the TeachersAnnuity Life Insurance Company is presently pending in the 53rd District Court of Travis County, wherein this fact is alleged and the court requested to declare the charter of such company to be void. Under these circumstances,we are of opinton that the law does not authorize the TeachersAnnuity Life InsuranceCompany, not lawfully organized -underthe laws of Texas, to consolidateor mergewith another insurance company.Mr. 0. P. Lockhart, Page 2 O-4:96

In view of this situation,we do not find it necessary to express an opinion upon other questions relatin, 0 to the proposedmerger or consolidation. The documents enclosedwith your letter are returnedherewith. Yours very truly ATTORNEY GENERALOF TEXAS s/ R. W. Fairchild

BY R. W. Fairchild

Assistant RWF:L&l/ldw ENCMSURE APPROVEzD

JUN 2, 1942 s/ Gerald.

C. Mann ATTORNEX GENERAL OF TEXAS APPROVED OPINION COMMIYXE BY B. W. B. CHAIRMAN
§ 1782.17 Parity lien. In order for the Agency to agree to a parity lien position, the borrower must submit a written request to the servicing office. ( a ) The written request for parity must contain the following items: ( 1 ) An explanation of the purpose of the request for parity; amount of loan for which parity is requested; description of security property; type of security instrument; name and address of financial institution requesting the transaction; and other information determined necessary by the servicing official to evaluate the request.
( 2 ) Current financial statements or an audit, if available or determined necessary by the servicing official.
( 3 ) An annual operating budget which projects income and expenses for a typical year's operation. If construction is involved, the budget must be projected through the first full year of operation following completion of the planned improvements.
( 4 ) A copy of the proposed security instrument.
( 5 ) A certification from the borrower that the Agency debt cannot be refinanced at reasonable rates and terms.
( 6 ) An appraisal, when the primary security is real estate or determined necessary by the servicing official in order to determine the adequacy of loan security or repayment ability.
( 7 ) A certification that any development work will comply with subpart C of part 1780 of this chapter.
( b ) Requests for parity must comply with requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, requirements as specified in the bond or loan documents, the requirements as specified in 7 CFR part 1780, subpart D, and as provided in applicable State law.
( c ) If the borrower has met all of the requirements in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section and the proposal is determined to be in the Government's interest, the Agency will then grant approval of the borrower's request for parity. The following factors will be considered in assessing whether the request is in the Government's interest: ( 1 ) The value of the added assets compared with the amount of new debt to be secured;
( 2 ) The value of the assets already pledged under the security documents, and any effects of the proposed transaction on the value of those assets;
( 3 ) The ratio of the total outstanding debt secured under the security documents to the value of all assets pledged as security under the security documents;
( 4 ) The borrower's ability to repay its debt owed to the Government;
( 5 ) The overall financial viability of the borrower;
( 6 ) The borrower's current relationship with the Agency (i.e. no defaults under the loan documents);
( 7 ) Such other factors that may be relevant in individual cases, as determined by the Agency.
Editorial Note on Part 1924
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1924 appear at 80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1924.108 Grading and drainage. ( a ) *General.* Soil and geologic conditions must be suitable for the type of construction proposed. In questionable or unsurveyed areas, the applicant or developer will provide an engineering report with supporting data sufficient to identify all pertinent subsurface conditions which could adversely affect the structure and show proposed solutions. Grading will promote drainage of surface water away from buildings and foundations, minimize earth settlement and erosion, and assure that drainage from adjacent properties onto the development or from the development to adjacent properties does not create a health hazard or other undesirable conditions. Grading and drainage will comply with exhibit B, paragraphs III and IV, of this subpart.
( b ) *Cuts and fills.* Development requiring extensive earthwork, cuts and fills of 4 feet or more shall be designed by a professional engineer. Where topography requires fills or extensive earthwork that must support structures and building foundations, these must be controlled fills designed, supervised, and tested by a qualified soils engineer.
( c ) *Slope protection.* All slopes must be protected from erosion by planting or other means. Slopes may require temporary cover if exposed for long periods during construction.
( d ) *Storm water systems.* The design of storm water systems must consider convenience and property protection both at the individual site level and the drainage basin level. Storm water systems should be compatible with the natural features of the site. In areas with inadequate drainage systems, permanent or temporary storm water storage shall be an integral part of the overall development plan. Design of these facilities shall consider safety, appearance, and economical maintenance operations.