alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                      HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
               STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                     (In thousands, except per share data)


                                               Year ended September 30,
                                              --------------------------
                                                1997     1996     1995
                                              -------- -------- --------
 

Net income................................... $108,322 $ 84,086 $ 63,331
                                              ======== ======== ========


                  PRIMARY
                  -------
 
 
Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding during the period...............  160,979  157,796  155,409
 
Exercise of options net of assumed purchase
 of treasury shares with proceeds therefrom..    6,819    7,878    6,717
                                              -------- -------- --------
 
Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding during the period, as adjusted..  167,798  165,674  162,126
                                              ======== ======== ========
 

Net income per share......................... $    .65 $    .51 $    .39
                                              ======== ======== ========

              FULLY DILUTED
              -------------
 
Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding during the period...............  160,979  157,796  155,409
 
Exercise of options net of assumed purchase
 of treasury shares with proceeds therefrom..    7,564    8,783    7,491
                                              -------- -------- --------
 
Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding during the period, as adjusted..  168,543  166,579  162,900
                                              ======== ======== ========
 

Net income per share......................... $    .64 $    .50 $    .39
                                              ======== ======== ========


                                      58
#### §§ 1735.81-1735.89 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Data Call Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Larry Mosley, CFO and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Larry Mosley

Larry MosleyCFO and DirectorDated: November 15, 2010

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Data Call Technologies, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.201 Purposes.

This subpart prescribes the Rural Development mission area policies, authorizations, and procedures for servicing the following programs: Community Facility loans and grants, Rural Business Enterprise/Television Demonstration grants; Association Recreation loans; Direct Business loans; Economic Opportunity Cooperative loans; Rural Renewal loans; Energy Impacted Area Development Assistance Program grants; National Nonprofit Corporation grants; System for Delivery of Certain Rural Development Programs panel grants; in part 4284 of this title, Rural and Cooperative Development Grants, Value-Added Producer Grants, and Agriculture Innovation Center Grants. Rural Development State Offices act on behalf of the Rural Business-Cooperative Service and the Rural Housing Service as to loan and grant programs formerly administered by the Farmers Home Administration and the Rural Development Administration. Loans sold without insurance to the private sector will be serviced in the private sector and will not be serviced under this subpart. The provisions of this subpart are not applicable to such loans. Future changes to this subpart will not be made applicable to such loans. This subpart does not apply to Water and Waste Programs of the Rural Utilities Service, Watershed loans, and Resource Conservation and Development Loans, which are serviced under part 1782 of this title.
PUBLIC LAW 109–185—MAR. 20, 2006 120 STAT. 293

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2113:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): July 13, considered and passed House.

Vol. 152 (2006): Mar. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–185

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2000

McDonough Street in Joliet, Illinois, as the ‘‘John F. Whiteside Joliet Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

2000 McDonough Street in Joliet, Illinois, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘John F. Whiteside Joliet Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John F.

Whiteside Joliet Post Office Building’’.

Approved March 20, 2006.

Mar. 20, 2006

[H.R. 2113]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Castle Arch Real Estate Investment Company, L.L.C. a California limited liability company (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I, Kirby D. Cochran, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:



a.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



b.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material

respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Kirby D. Cochran

Kirby D. Cochran, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



Dated May 12, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28671]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12379 and <greek-i>12380]


U.S. Virgin Islands Disaster <greek-i>VI-00005

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Territory of the U.S. 
Virgin Islands (FEMA-1948-DR), dated 11/05/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Mudslides, and Landslides 
associated with Tropical Storm Otto.
    Incident Period: 10/01/2010 through 10/08/2010.

DATES: Effective Date: 11/05/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/04/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/05/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 11/05/2010, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Islands: Saint Croix; Saint John; Saint Thomas, Including Water 
Island.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12379B 
and for economic injury is 12380B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-28671 Filed 11-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Iver Gardea Ramirez

, * From the 385 th District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR41936

.

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 0004 5

- CR * April 3, 2014

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has considered Iver Gardea Ramirez’s motion to dismiss his appeal and

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
§ 1786.203 Special considerations. Generally all FFB borrowers with loans guaranteed by RUS whose FFB notes have not been accelerated are eligible to prepay or refinance under this part. All requests for prepayment or refinancing will be processed in accordance with this subpart except that some requests for refinancing and prepayments are more complicated and thus will involve special considerations. These requests will have to be handled on a case by case basis and include: ( a ) Telephone borrowers who are required to meet certain terms of their indenture;
( b ) Borrowers who have amended their old form note or have already repriced prior to September 30, 1993;
( c ) Borrowers that have been involved in a merger or consolidation;
( d ) Borrowers whose obligations to RUS, FFB notes, or security instruments differ from those normally used;
( e ) A request to prepay or refinance an amount of less than $100,000 or an amount of less than the full amount of an advance outstanding; or
( f ) A request to prepay or refinance a note that includes unadvanced loan funds.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Warp Technology Holding, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                             |  |                                                
|---------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Dated:    September 28, 2005 |  | /s/    Rodney A. Bienvenu, Jr.                 
|                             |  | Rodney A. Bienvenu, Jr. Chief Executive Officer



|                             |  |                                    
|---------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|Dated:    September 28, 2005 |  | /s/    Jeff Bailey                 
|                             |  | Jeff Bailey Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1424.5 Agreement process. ( a ) To participate, an eligible producer must submit a signed agreement during the FY sign-up period. Agreements may be for single or multiple FY's. However, multiple FY agreements require producers to submit annual production estimate reports during each applicable FY sign-up period. Such reports must comply with the terms of the agreement and this part. In all cases, the accounting for compliance will be made on a per FY basis.
( b ) Sign-up each FY will be held for 30 calendar days beginning for: ( 1 ) FY 2003 on the date of publication of this rule;
( 2 ) FY 2004 and beyond on August 1 of the FY before the applicable FY.
( c ) After agreements are submitted: ( 1 ) If determined eligible by KCCO, an agreement number will be assigned, and a notification will be mailed to the producer;
( 2 ) If additional information is needed for KCCO to determine eligibility, the producer will be contacted as soon as practicable and requested to provide additional supporting documentation;
( 3 ) If determined ineligible by KCCO, producers will be notified in writing that their agreement was rejected and the reason for the determination.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TennesseeCommerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|        | (1)    | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | (2)    | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

 
|        |   | By:                                  | /s/ Arthur F. Helf |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Arthur F. Helf                       |               |   |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |               |   |
|   |   |                                 |               |   |
|   |   | Dated: May 14, 2007                  |               |   |

 

----
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/ssi/spotlights/spot-medicaid.htm**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/ssi/spotlights/spot-medicaid.htm**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 223]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ223.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 374]]

Public Law 109-223
109th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 To memorialize and honor the contribution of Chief Justice William H. 
          Rehnquist. <<NOTE: May 18, 2006 -  [H.J. Res. 83]>> 

Whereas President Richard M. Nixon nominated William H. Rehnquist to 
    replace Associate Justice John Marshall Harlan on the Supreme Court 
    on October 21, 1971, he was confirmed by the United States Senate on 
    December 10, 1971, and served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme 
    Court of the United States from January 1972 through September 1986;

Whereas President Ronald W. Reagan nominated Associate Justice William 
    H. Rehnquist to replace Chief Justice Warren E. Burger as the 
    Sixteenth Chief Justice of the United States on June 20, 1986, and 
    he was confirmed by the United States Senate on September 17, 1986;

Whereas William Rehnquist presided as Chief Justice from September 1986 
    until September 2005 for a total of 19 years, making him the fourth-
    longest-serving Chief Justice after Melville W. Fuller, Roger B. 
    Taney, and John Marshall, and the longest-serving Chief Justice who 
    had previously served as an Associate Justice;

Whereas Chief Justice Rehnquist ably presided as chief administrator of 
    the United States courts to insure the due administration of justice 
    during times of rising caseloads and fiscal constraints;

Whereas Chief Justice Rehnquist was respected for his intellect, 
    fairness, and humor by his fellow Justices and by members of the 
    other branches of government; and

Whereas despite the debilitating effects of thyroid cancer, Chief 
    Justice Rehnquist continued his service to the court and the 
    country, and administered the oath of office to President George W. 
    Bush at his second inauguration on January 20, 2005: Now, therefore, 
    be it

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND HONOR.

     <<NOTE: Supreme Court.>> The United States, acting through 
Congress, authorizes and directs the Curator of the Supreme Court, 
subject to the direction and approval of the Chief Justice of the United 
States, to procure a marble bust, including pedestal, of the late Chief 
Justice William H. Rehnquist, and to cause them to be placed in the 
Supreme Court building to honor his memory and legacy to the Supreme 
Court of the United States.

[[Page 120 STAT. 375]]

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated $50,000 to carry out this 
Act.

    Approved May 18, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 83:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Apr. 25, considered and passed House.
            May 4, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Investment Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on thedate hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2020 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: November 3, 2020 

 
/s/ David GladstoneDavid Gladstone*Chief Executive Officer and**Chairman of the Board of Directors***
#### § 1717.650 Purpose.

This subpart sets forth general regulations for implementing and interpreting provisions of the RUS mortgage and loan contract regarding investments, loans, and guarantees made by electric borrowers, as well as the provisions of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as amended, including section 312 (7 U.S.C. 901 *et seq.*) (RE Act), permitting, in certain circumstances, that electric borrowers under the RE Act may, without restriction or prior approval of the Administrator of the Rural Utilities Service (RUS), invest their own funds and make loans or guarantees.
#### In re: Gregory A. THOMPSON and Suzanne A. Thompson, Debtors-Appellees, Appeal of: Nancy J. Gargula, United States Trustee.

No. 07-1240.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued Sept. 10, 2007.

Decided Oct. 2, 2007.

Stephanie R. Marcus, Department of Justice Civil Division, Appellate Staff, Washington, DC, for Trustee-Appellant.

Gregory A. Thompson, Lizton, IN, pro se.

Suzanne A. Thompson, Lizton, IN, pro se.

Before Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge, Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Although it takes two to tango, it only takes one to make an appeal. And so it is in this ease where the appeal is unopposed. And one would think that the chances of winning an appeal are pretty good when no one is arguing in opposition. But, as this case proves, even unopposed appeals are sometimes losers.

The facts are simple. On March 15, 2006, Gregory and Suzanne Thompson filed a joint petition under Chapter 13 of the bankruptcy code. The next day, the bankruptcy court determined that the Thompsons failed to comply with the pre-filing “credit counseling requirement” set out in § 109(h) of the recently enacted Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Con*476sumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) which took effect on October 17, 2005. Upon that determination, the court struck the petition and closed the case.

The U.S. Trustee then filed a motion to reconsider, contending that the court erred by “striking the petition.” Instead, the Trustee said the case should have been dismissed. The bankruptcy court denied reconsideration and the Trustee appealed to the district court which, in a 4-page order signed by Chief Judge Larry J. McKinney on April 4, 2006, affirmed. This appeal followed.

We heard arguments on this case on September 10, 2007. Subsequently, we entered an order directing the Trustee to file a statement “explaining why her appeal is not moot.” She has done so, but we are unconvinced — this appeal is moot.

The difference between what the bankruptcy court (backed by the district court) did — strike the petition — and what the Trustee wants — a dismissal of the petition — is found in an amended section (362) of the BAPCPA which limits the application of the code’s “automatic stay,” where, in a previous year, a debtor’s case has been “dismissed.” So, if the bankruptcy court had “dismissed” the Thompson’s petition on March 16, 2006, rather than strike it as it did, they would be precluded from obtaining an automatic stay for a subsequent filing until March 16, 2007. Because that period has passed, we conclude that this appeal is moot.

Accordingly, the judgment must be VACATED and the case REMANDED to the district court with instructions to dismiss as moot. The unreviewable decision of the district court will have no collateral consequences. *See Department of the Treasury v. Galioto,*477 U.S. 556, 106 S.Ct. 2683, 91 L.Ed.2d 459 (1986); *United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.,*340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).

SO ORDERED.