alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Maidenform Brands, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended October 2, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Christopher W. Vieth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Christopher W. ViethChristopher
      W. ViethExecutive
      Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial
              Officer(principal
      financial officer)





November
10, 2010





This certification shall not be
deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the reference to our firm in the Financial Highlights and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Legal Counsel in this Registration Statement
(Form N-1A) of Nicholas Fund, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 57 to the Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 (File No. 002-30447).



|/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|---------------------



|Chicago, IllinoisJuly 30, 2009
|------------------------------

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 23, 2016

No. 04-16-00688-CR

Frank Deon PHILLIPS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR9117

Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on November 23, 2016.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of November, 2016.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1971 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide certain TRICARE beneficiaries 

with the opportunity to retain access to TRICARE Prime. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2013 

Mr. KLINE (for himself and Mr. THORNBERRY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide certain 

TRICARE beneficiaries with the opportunity to retain 

access to TRICARE Prime. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FUTURE AVAILABILITY OF TRICARE PRIME 

4 FOR CERTAIN BENEFICIARIES ENROLLED IN 

5 TRICARE PRIME. 

6 Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization 

7 Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 

8 1816) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub10 section (c); and 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1971 IH

1 (2) by inserting the following new subsection: 

2 ‘‘(b) ACCESS TO TRICARE PRIME.— 

3 ‘‘(1) ONE-TIME ELECTION.—Subject to para4 graph (3), the Secretary shall ensure that each af5 fected eligible beneficiary who is enrolled in 

6 TRICARE Prime as of September 30, 2013, may 

7 make a one-time election to continue such enroll8 ment in TRICARE Prime, notwithstanding that a 

9 contract described in subsection (a)(2)(A) does not 

10 allow for such enrollment based on the location in 

11 which such beneficiary resides. The beneficiary may 

12 continue such enrollment in TRICARE Prime so 

13 long as the beneficiary resides in the same ZIP code 

14 as the ZIP Code in which the beneficiary resided at 

15 the time of such election. 

16 ‘‘(2) ENROLLMENT IN TRICARE STANDARD.—If 

17 an affected eligible beneficiary makes the one-time 

18 election under paragraph (1), the beneficiary may 

19 thereafter elect to enroll in TRICARE Standard at 

20 any time in accordance with a contract described in 

21 subsection (a)(2)(A). 

22 ‘‘(3) RESIDENCE AT TIME OF ELECTION.—An 

23 affected eligible beneficiary may not make the one24 time election under paragraph (1) if, at the time of 

25 such election, the beneficiary does not reside in a 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1971 IH

1 ZIP code that is in a region described in subsection 

2 (c)(1)(B).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
August 8, 2016

Mr. Jason Boucher

Simple Computers 101

428 Evangeline Street

Madawaska, ME 04756

Re: FAA–2016–3214

Dear Mr. Boucher:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
Exhibit 31.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I , Richard Kelley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10K-SB of Clixtix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4.The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed such
disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this annual report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 25, 2004


/s/ Richard Kelley
Richard Kelley, Vice President
(principal financial officer, principal accounting officer)


                                       37
#### § 1786.52 Prepayment.

Through September 30, 1987, the Administrator may, pursuant to this subpart, permit eligible electric and telephone borrowers to prepay all outstanding RUS Notes issued or assumed by such borrowers and held in the Fund, upon paying the lesser of the outstanding balance or the Discounted Present Value.
**Exhibit23.01**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-59098 of NorthernStates Power Company - Minnesota on Form S-3 of our report dated March 3, 2005,relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, appearingin this Annual Report on Form 10-K for Northern States Power Company -Minnesota for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 
| /S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Minneapolis, Minnesota         |
| March 3, 2005                  |

 

1

----
#### Ernest L. COX, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2007-7106.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 3, 2007.

Ernest L. Cox, pro se.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and DYE, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and to dismiss Ernest L. Cox’s appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ judgment in *Cox v. Nicholson,*04-0558, 2006 WL 3007536 (Vet.App.2006), for lack of jurisdiction. Cox has not responded.

Cox, through counsel, sought review by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims of a Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision that denied reopening his service-connection claim for a back disorder. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims stated that the sole argument on appeal was whether the Board afforded Cox notice in compliance with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000. The court held that the Board properly determined that a May 2002 letter provided the necessary notice. Cox appeals to this court.

Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court has limited jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. *See Forshey v. Principi,*284 F.3d 1335, 1338 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en banc). This court “may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case.” 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2).

In his brief, Cox argues that the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims did not accurately consider his medical records, which is a factual issue not within our jurisdiction. Further, Cox does not challenge the sole issue decided by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which was in any event a factual determination over which we would not have jurisdiction. *Mayfield v. Nicholson,*444 F.3d 1328, 1335 (Fed.Cir.2006) (noting that whether a letter satisfied the VCAA notice requirements presents a factual issue). Because Cox fails to raise an issue within our jurisdiction, we must dismiss this appeal.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary’s motions are granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
#### § 1730.66 Administrative waiver.

The Administrator may waive in all or part, for good cause, the requirements and procedures of this subpart.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Share With Youth: Job Corps Voices: Kevin and Green Career Training — Career Training and Education Program

Job Corps provides students the opportunity to meet new people, earn a GED or equivalency credentials, and learn a new trade. Kevin hopes to improve the environment through "Green Training," focusing on advanced solar panel training.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXh4T0TKg3g&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=share-with-youth
Per information provided in the 3/10/05 revision of the e ngineering report for P040587,

Page 1 of 2

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P040587 Assessor: Wormell

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites:

Release Activity: MFG

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT Page 2 of

2

CASE NUMBER:P040587
120 STAT. 308 PUBLIC LAW 109–200—MAR. 20, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4107:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): Dec. 13, considered and passed House.

Vol. 152 (2006): Mar. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–200

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1826 Pennsylvania Avenue in Baltimore, Maryland, as the ‘‘Maryland State Delegate Lena

K. Lee Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

1826 Pennsylvania Avenue in Baltimore, Maryland, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Maryland State Delegate Lena K. Lee Post

Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Maryland

State Delegate Lena K. Lee Post Office Building’’.

Approved March 20, 2006.

Mar. 20, 2006

[H.R. 4107]
#### §§ 1735.63-1735.69 [Reserved]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDynamics of vegetation and soils of oak/saw palmetto scrub after fire: Observations from permanent transectsTen permanent 15 m transects previously established in two oak/saw palmetto scrub stands burned in December 1986, while two transects remained unburned. Vegetation in the greater than 0.5 m and the less than 0.5 m layers on these transects was sampled at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months postburn and determined structural features of the vegetation (height, percent bare ground, total cover). The vegetation data were analyzed from each sampling by height layer using detrended correspondence analysis ordination. Vegetation data for the greater than 0.5 m layer for the entire time sequence were combined and analyzed using detrended correspondence analysis ordination. Soils were sampled at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postburn and analyzed for pH, conductivity, organic matter, exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, K, Na), NO3-N, NH4-N, Al, available metals (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn), and PO4-P. Shrub species recovered at different rates postfire with saw palmetto reestablishing cover greater than 0.5 m within one year, but the scrub oaks had not returned to preburn cover greater than 0.5 m in 3 years after the fire. These differences in growth rates resulted in dominance shifts after the fire with saw palmetto increasing relative to the scrub oaks. Overall changes in species richness were minor, although changes occurred in species richness by height layers due to different growth rates. Soils of well drained and poorly drained sites differed markedly. Soil responses to the fire appeared minor. Soil pH increased at 6 and 12 months postfire; calcium increased at 6 months postburn. Nitrate-nitrogen increased at 12 months postburn. Low values of conductivity, PO4-P, Mg, K, Na, and Fe at 12 months postburn may be related to heavy rainfall the preceding month. Seasonal variability in some soil parameters appeared to occur.Document ID19910012322Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSchmalzer, Paul A.*(Bionetics Corp. Cocoa Beach, FL., United States)*Hinkle, G. Ross*(Bionetics Corp. Cocoa Beach, FL., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 25, 1991Subject CategoryEnvironment PollutionReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103817NAS 1.15:103817Accession Number91N21635Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS10-11624Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012322.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 1493.3 Restrictions on programs and cargo preference statement. ( a ) *Restrictions on use of Payment Guarantees.* ( 1 ) Payment Guarantees authorized under these regulations shall not be used for foreign aid, foreign policy, or debt rescheduling purposes.
( 2 ) CCC shall not make Payment Guarantees available in connection with sales of U.S. Agricultural Commodities to any country that the Secretary determines cannot adequately service the debt associated with such sale.
( 3 ) CCC shall not make Payment Guarantees available in connection with sales of U.S. Agricultural Commodities financed by any Foreign Financial Institution that CCC determines cannot adequately service the debt associated with such sale.
( b ) *Cargo preference laws.* The provisions of the cargo preference laws do not apply to export sales with respect to which Payment Guarantees are issued under these programs.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of American Tire Distributors Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his best knowledge:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |        |  |                                                     
|---------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2007 |  | By:    |  | /s/    RICHARD P.
JOHNSON                           
|                       |  | Name:  |  | Richard P. Johnson                                  
|                       |  | Title: |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                
|                       |  |       
|                       |  | By:    |  | /s/    DAVID L.
DYCKMAN                             
|                       |  | Name:  |  | David L. Dyckman                                    
|                       |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Adivision ofthe American Chemical Society 

# lnventoryExpertService Phone: 800:-631-1884, 614-447-3870 Fax: 614-447-3747 · E-mail: answers@oas.org Web: \WM'.cas.org/productsJother·cas-productslclient--servlcesJ 

# I ! ' 

# I

**··-··---------.::1.--------~----·~--** --- ·- ------------------------·------ --------------·----!. **-~--~----,--~----·---------------·-·--·-----------------------·······-·····-··········------** 

# INVENTORY EXPERTSERVICE REPORT IES Order Number: 386622-1 Registry 

### Number:~ CA Index Name:



### CAS 

# D )

Please printthe above CA Index Name on the appropriate page ofyour PMN. Ifthis box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. Please make the same corrections toyour PMN before submitting itto the EPA. 

### 2540 Olentangy 

### River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, OH 43210-0334 .. 

### :::· --



### USA 

# l I

# I I -1·· I_ i. 

# i ! :'<;' L

I 

## ., 

# f 

# I 

# I J

# lnventoryExpertService Adivision of the American Chemical Society Phone:BOD-631-1884,614-447-3670 Fax:614-447-3747 E-mail: answers@cas.org Web: www.cas.org/products/other-cas-productslclient-services! 

# INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT IES Order Number: 387425 Registry

**Number:~** 

### CA Index Name:

CAS 

# DPlease print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page ofyour PMN. Ifthis box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. Please makethe same corrections to your PMN before submitting it tothe EPA. 2540 

### Olentangy River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, OH 4321 0-0334 .,.,



### USA
-90 -88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 32

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL