alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1730.26 Certification. ( a ) *Engineer's certification.* Where provided for in the borrower's loan documents, RUS may require the borrower to provide an “Engineer's Certification” as to the condition of the borrower's system (including, but not limited to, all mortgaged property.) Such certification shall be in form and substance satisfactory to RUS and shall be prepared by a professional engineer satisfactory to RUS. If RUS determines that the Engineer's Certification discloses a need for improvements to the condition of its system or any other operations of the borrower, the borrower shall, upon notification by RUS, promptly undertake to accomplish such improvements.
( b ) *Emergency Restoration Plan certification.* The borrower's Manager or Chief Executive Officer shall provide written certification to RUS stating that a VRA has been satisfactorily completed that meets the criteria of § 1730.27 (a), (b), (c), or (d), as applicable and § 1730.27(e)(1) through (e)(8), and that the borrower has an ERP that meets the criteria of § 1730.28 (a), (b), (c), or (d), as applicable, and § 1730.28 (e), (f), and (g). The written certification shall be in letter form. Applicants for new RUS electric loans, loan guarantees or grants shall include the written certification in the application package submitted to RUS. If the self-certification of an ERP and VRA are not received as set forth in this section, approval of the loan, loan guarantees or grants will not be considered until the certifications are received by RUS.
[63 FR 3450, Jan. 23, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 60541, Oct. 12, 2004]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Addressing the Mental Health Needs of Racial and Ethnic Minority Youth: A Guide for Practitioners      

# Resource: Addressing the Mental Health Needs of Racial and Ethnic Minority Youth: A Guide for Practitioners

This guide (PDF, 28 pages) addresses reasons for differences in mental health etiology and outcomes among youth. While some racial and ethnic minority youth experience lower rates of lifetime mental health disorders, their disorders tend to have a more chronic course. **Learn more (PDF, 28 pages).**
#### § 15.94 Disability of hearing officer.

In the case of death, illness, disqualification, or unavailability of the designated hearing officer, another hearing officer may be designated by the Secretary to take his place. If such death, illness, disqualification or unavailability occurs during the course of a hearing, the hearing will be either continued under a substitute hearing officer, or terminated and tried de novo in the discretion of the Secretary. In the absence of the designated hearing officer any hearing examiner may rule on motions and other interlocutory papers.
#### § 160.48 Form of certificate.

The certificates issued under this part by licensed inspectors shall be on forms approved by the Administrator.
FORM 8-K





SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549





Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  October 22, 2003





NOLAND COMPANY





A Virginia Corporation            IRS Identification #54-0320170





Commission File No. #2-27393





80 29th Street

Newport News, VA 23607

Telephone:  (757) 928-9000

Item 7.  Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits

(c)  Exhibit 99.1 - Noland Company Press Release dated October 22, 2003.

Item 9.  Regulation FD Disclosure

On October 22, 2003, Noland Company issued a press release reporting its financial results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003.  A copy of the release is being furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is hereby incorporated by reference.

In addition to being furnished pursuant to "Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure" ("Item 9") of Form 8-K, the information contained in this Form 8-K is being furnished pursuant to "Item 12. Results of Operations and Financial Condition," under Item 9 of Form 8-K, as directed by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission release No. 34-47583.

The information in this Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.

|Exhibit |                                                              
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Number  | Description                                                  
|99.1    | Press release dated October 22, 2003 issued by Noland Company

SIGNATURE



Pursuant of the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

The Noland Company

Date:October 23, 2003			By:Arthur P. Henderson, Jr.

Arthur P. Henderson, Jr.

Vice President - Finance
#### Emily Flynn, Plaintiff, v Stephen J. Flynn et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Stephen J. Flynn, Plaintiff, v New *664York City Transit Authority et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.) Kenneth Turner, Appellant, v Stephen J. Flynn et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 3.) Michael Burden, Plaintiff, v City of New York et al., Defendants. (Action No. 4.) Victor Lopez, Appellant, v Stephen J. Flynn, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. New York City Transit Authority et al., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (Action No. 5.)

[776 NYS2d 516]

In related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, Kenneth Turner, the plaintiff in Action No. 3, and Victor Lopez, the plaintiff in Action No. 5, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Ponterio, J.), dated May 7, 2003, which granted the motion of Stephen J. Flynn, a defendant in those actions, and the motion of Kevin McRae and the New York City Transit Authority, defendants in Action No. 3 and third-party defendants in Action No. 5, for summary judgment dismissing the complaints in those actions on the ground that the plaintiffs in those actions did not sustain serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The moving parties (hereinafter the defendants) made a prima facie showing that the plaintiffs in Action Nos. 3 and 5 (hereinafter the plaintiffs) did not sustain serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). The affirmations of the plaintiffs’ physicians submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motions failed to establish that any of the alleged injuries or limitations in movement were of a significant nature *(see Trotter v Hart, 285*AD2d 772 [2001]; *Williams v Ciaramella,*250 AD2d 763 [1998]; *Cabri v Myung Soo Park,*260 AD2d 525 [1999]; *Waldman v Dong Kook Chang,*175 AD2d 204 [1991]; *Medina v Zalmen Reis & Assoc., 239*AD2d 394 [1997]).

Moreover, the plaintiffs failed to submit any competent medical evidence supporting their claim that they were unable to perform substantially all of their daily activities for not less than 90 of the first 180 days following the accident as a result of it *(see Sainte-Aime v Ho,*274 AD2d 569 [2000]; *Jackson v New York City Tr. Auth.,*273 AD2d 200 [2000]; *Greene v Miranda,*272 AD2d 441 [2000]; *Arshad v Gomer,*268 AD2d 450 [2000]; *Bennett v Reed,*263 AD2d 800 [1999]; *DiNunzio v County of Suffolk,*256 AD2d 498, 499 [1998]).

Accordingly, the defendants were properly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint in Action Nos. 3 and 5. Santucci, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28673]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12368 and <greek-i>12369]


Puerto Rico Disaster <greek-i>PR-00012

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION:  Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of 
Puerto Rico (FEMA-1946-DR), dated 10/26/2010.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Mudslides, and Landslides 
associated with Tropical Storm Otto.
    Incident Period: 10/04/2010 through 10/08/2010.

DATES: Effective Date: 11/05/2010.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/27/2010.
    Economic Injury (Eidl) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/26/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Puerto 
Rico, dated 10/26/2010, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Adjuntas; Morovis; Orocovis; Villalba.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-28673 Filed 11-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7502

RAYMOND PILKINGTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-98-335) Submitted: December 8, 1998 Decided: December 29, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Pilkington, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Raymond Pilkington seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pilkington v. Angelone , No. CA-98-335 (E.D. Va. Sept. 17, 1998).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 1560.1 Scope.

This part outlines the procedures that will be used by the Administrator of the Foreign Agricultural Service to monitor and inform the Secretary of Agriculture of data regarding the importation of fresh fruits and vegetables from Canada.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THECHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OFGLOBAL PARTNERS LPPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

** **

** **

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2009 of Global Partners LP (the “Partnership”)and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Thomas J. Hollister, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofGlobal GP LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
| Dated:  May 8,  2009 | By:                                                                                                                                |  /s/ Thomas J. Hollister |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                |              Thomas  J. Hollister                                 |
|                                |              Chief  Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                |              of  Global GP LLC, general partner                   |
|                                |              of  Global Partners LP                               |

 

----
Patrizio
      & Zhao, LLCCertified
      Public Accountants and Consultants
              
              322
      Route 46 WestParsippany,
      NJ 07054Tel:  (973)
      882-8810Fax:
      (973) 882-0788www.pzcpa.com




December
22, 2008





U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission


Division
of Corporate Finance


100 F.
Street, N.E.


Washington,
D.C. 20549








To Whom
It May Concern:





We are
aware that JPAK Group, Inc. has included our report dated November 4, 2008, in
its 10Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. We are also aware of our
responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.








Yours
truly,








/s/
Patrizio & Zhao, LLC




PATRIZIO
& ZHAO, LLC


Certified
Public Accountants and Consultants





Parsippany,
New Jersey
Exhibit 32.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Sophocles Zoullas, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: May 9, 2007


  /s/ Sophocles Zoullas
------------------------
Sophocles Zoullas
Chief Executive Officer
State of California 

AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

EXECUTIVE ORDER R-08-007 

Relating to the Adoption of Regulations to Reduce Emissions from Diesel 

Engines on Commercial Harbor Craft Operated Within California Waters and 24 

Nautical Miles of the California Baseline 

WHEREAS, on October 26, 2007, and November 15, 2007, the Air Resources Board 

(the Board or ARB) conducted public hearings to consider adoption of regulations to 

reduce emissions from diesel engines on commercial harbor craft operated within 

California waters and 24 nautical miles of the California baseline, as set forth in the 

Initial Statement of Reasons released to the public on September 7, 2007; 

WHEREAS, following the public hearing on November 15, 2007, the Board adopted 

Resolution 07-47, in which the Board approved for adoption new section 2299.5 of 

chapter 5.1 of division 3, title 13, CCR, and new section 93118.5 of subchapter 7.5, 

chapter 1, division 3, title 17, CCR, as set forth in Attachment A thereto, with the 

modifications shown in Attachment B and Attachment C thereto; 

WHEREAS, in Resolution 07-47, the Board directed the Executive Officer to adopt the 

regulations, after making the modified regulatory language and additional supporting 

documents and information available for public comment for a period of 15 days, 

provided that the Executive Officer shall consider such written comments regarding the 

modified text as may be submitted during this period, shall make modifications as may 

be appropriate in light of the comments received, and shall present the regulations to 

the Board for further consideration if he determines that this is warranted; 

WHEREAS, on June 18, 2008, the modified regulations, reflecting the amendments 

approved by the Board and other changes made to best reflect the intent of the Board at 

the hearing, were made available for public comment for a period of at least 15 days, 

with the changes to the originally proposed text clearly indicated, in accordance with the 

provisions of title 1, California Code of Regulations, section 44; 

WHEREAS, a number of written comment letters were received during the 15-day 

comment period and those comments have been considered by the Executive Officer; 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the recitals and findings contained in 

Resolution 07-47 are incorporated by reference herein. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED in accordance with Resolution 07-47, the adoption new 

section 2299.5 of chapter 5.1 of division 3, title 13, CCR, and new section 93118.5 of 

subchapter 7.5, chapter 1, division 3, title 17, CCR, are adopted as set forth in 

Attachment 1 hereto. 
Executive Order R-08-007 2

Executed this __2nd _day of _September , 2008, at Sacramento, California. 

 ___________/s/___________ 

 James N. Goldstene 

 Executive Officer 

Attachment
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1427.173 Foreclosure.

Any seed cotton pledged as collateral for a loan that is abandoned or has not been ginned and pledged as collateral for a nonrecourse loan under subpart A of this part by the seed cotton loan maturity date may be removed from storage by CCC and ginned and the resulting lint cotton warehoused for the account of CCC. The lint cotton and cottonseed may be sold at such time, in such manner and upon such terms as CCC may determine, at public or private sale. CCC may become the purchaser of the whole or any part of such cotton and cottonseed. If the proceeds received from the sales of the cotton are less than the amount due on the loan (including principal, interest, ginning charges, and any other charges incurred by CCC), the producer is liable for such difference. If the proceeds received from sale of the cotton are greater than the sum of the amount due plus any cost incurred by CCC in conducting the sale of the cotton, the amount of such excess will be paid to the producer or, if applicable, to any secured creditor of the producer.

[80 FR 137, Jan. 2, 2015]
Exhibit 10.30

Health Management Associates, Inc.

Certain Executive Officer Compensation Information

Effective February 24, 2009, Health Management Associates, Inc. (the Company) finalized the determination of cash
bonuses to certain of its named executive officers. Those bonuses, which pertain to the Companys annual and long-term incentive compensation programs for the year ended December 31, 2008, were approved by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company. The table below summarizes those bonuses.



|                                                                                |  |                  |         |                                           |   |       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ------- | ----------------------------------------- | - | ------
|Executive Officer                                                               |  | Annual CashBonus |         | Long-Term IncentiveCompensation CashBonus
|Robert E. Farnham,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer             |  | $                | 235,000 |                                           | $ | 14,583
|                                                                                |  |                 
|Kelly E. Curry,Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer        |  | $                | 396,563 |                                           | $ | 35,156
|                                                                                |  |                 
|Timothy R. Parry,Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |  | $                | 205,625 |                                           | $ | 9,115 

The cash bonuses described above were made under the Companys Amended and Restated 1996
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (the EICP), a comprehensive executive compensation plan in which the Companys named executive officers, among others, may participate. A summary of the EICP is contained in the Companys
definitive proxy statement dated March 31, 2008 under the heading Proposal Two: Proposal to Amend and Restate the Health Management Associates, Inc. 1996 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan  Summary of the EIPC, which
summary is incorporated herein by reference. Such description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual EICP, which can be found at Exhibit A to the Companys definitive proxy statement dated March 31, 2008. Additionally, the
form of Cash Performance Award under the EICP relating to the long-term incentive compensation cash bonuses disclosed in the above table can be found at Exhibit 10.26 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.