alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of American Tire Distributors Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his best
knowledge:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 1, 2005 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                         |  |     |  |                                                                                                              
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    RICHARD P.
JOHNSON                                                                                    
|                         |  |     |  | Name: Richard P. Johnson Title:
  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                                       
|                         |  |    
|                         |  | By: |  | /s/    WILLIAM E.
BERRY                                                                                      
|                         |  |     |  | Name: William E. Berry Title:
  President, Chief Operating Officer and Principal            Financial Officer
#### § 1735.76 Acquisition of affiliates.

A borrower shall not use RUS loan funds to acquire any stock or any telephone plant of an affiliate.

[54 FR 14626, Apr. 12, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39395, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 62 FR 46871, Sept. 5, 1997]
<PAGE>
                       FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC.


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Farmers & Merchants
Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Joe E. Crossgrove, Chief Executive
Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1.     The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and;

       2.     To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
              presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
              results of operations of the Company as of and for the period
              covered by the Report.


Date: March 28, 2003              /s/ Joe E. Crossgrove
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                  Joe E. Crossgrove, Chief Executive Officer





                                       77
Editorial Note on Part 1951
Editorial Notes: 1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1951.16 Other servicing actions on real estate type loan accounts. ( a ) *Installment on note and other charges* — ( 1 ) *Direct loan accounts.* For a borrower with a direct loan, the term “installation on note and other charges,” as used in this Subpart, will be the sum of the following: ( i ) Annual installment for the year as provided in the promissory note(s).
( ii ) Any recoverable cost charges paid for the borrower during the year. (“Recoverable costs” is defined in § 1951.10(a) of this Subpart.)
( 2 ) *Insured loan accounts.* “Loan insurance charge” means a separate insurance charge applying to FO and SW insured loans evidenced by promissory note forms bearing a form date before January 8, 1959. For all insured loans evidenced by note forms bearing a form date of January 8, 1959, or later, the insurance charge is called “annual charge” and is included in the interest position of the annual installment in the note. For a borrower with an insured loan, the term “Installment on note and other charge” means the sum of the following: ( i ) Annual installment for the year as provided in the promissory note.
( ii ) Amounts owed the Agricultural Credit Insurance Fund. These amounts are covered by the general term “Insurance Account” and consist of the following: ( A ) Unpaid loan insurance charges from prior years.
( B ) Loan insurance charge for the current year. The loan insurance charge is computed on the basis of the amount of the unpaid principal obligation as of the installment due date and is due and payable on or before the next installment due date.
( C ) Any unpaid balance on advances from the insurance fund, including any recoverable cost charges paid for the borrower during the year.
( D ) Any accrued interest on advances from the insurance fund.
( iii ) The amounts owned on the insurance account must be paid by regular payments each year whether or not the note account is ahead of schedule.
( b ) *Schedule status.* For direct and insured loans, a borrower will be on schedule when the sum of regular payments through the last preceding due date of the note equals the sum of installments on the note and other charges due through the same date. Such a borrower will be ahead of schedule or behind schedule when the sum of such regular payments is larger or smaller, respectively, than the sum of such installments on the note and other charges.
( c ) *Real estate payments.* A borrower may make regular payments ahead of schedule at any time and use them later to forego payments or to supplement the amount available during any year for payment on the annual installment on the note and other charges. Refunds and extra payments will not be used in this way.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1705 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1705

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for certain forms of 
              physical therapy under the TRICARE program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2013

Mr. Burgess (for himself and Mr. Cotton) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for certain forms of 
              physical therapy under the TRICARE program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rehabilitative Therapy Parity for 
Military Beneficiaries Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF CERTAIN FORMS OF PHYSICAL THERAPY UNDER TRICARE.

    Section 1077 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(17), by inserting ``In accordance 
        with subsection (g),'' before ``Any''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Rehabilitative therapy provided pursuant to subsection 
(a)(17) may include additional therapeutic exercises or therapeutic 
activities if such exercises or activities are included in the 
authorized individual plan of care of the individual receiving such 
therapy. Such exercises or activities may include, in addition to other 
therapeutic exercises or therapeutic activities, therapies provided on 
a horse, balance board, ball, bolster, and bench.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Campbell *vs.*Threlkeld.

Case.

Statement of the sase‘

An action for Prose?nt'ng a malicious suit, is not sustained !’/'*Ti?rei*>ro£«' that the plaintiff in the suit complained of, was defeated : the malice and want of probable cause, must also be shown. The defendant, of course, may introduce evidence, conducing to show, that there was no malice, and that there was probable cause.

{Messrs. Sanders and Depew for Plaintiff; no appearance for Defendant.]

From the Circuit Court for Owen Countt.

*November*10.

Judge Nicholas

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Campbell sued Threlkeld, in detinue, for a slave; and also filed her bill against him, ajleging her apprehension that he would remove the slave out of the state; upon which she obtained an order requiring the sheriff to take the slave into custody, to abide the event of the action of detinue, unless Threlkeld would give bond and security to have the slave forthcoming. Threlkeld failing to give the bond, the sheriff took the slave into custody, and kept him until the termination of the suit, about two years thereafter. Campbell failed to recover in the action of detinue, and her- injunction was ultimately dissolved, and her bill dismissed. Threlkeld then brought this action on the case, against Campbell', for the malicious prosecution of the bill in chancery, whereby he alleges, that he sustained damage in the loss of the use and hire of the slave.

On the trial, he adduced nothing but the facts above stated, conducing to show that the suit was maliciously prosecuted ; and the defendant thereupon moved an instruction as in case of-a nonsuit, which was overruled. The court, also, refused to permit the defendant to prove facts conducing to show, that the suit had not been instituted through malice.

The motion for a nonsuit should have prevailed. It appears to be well established, that it is not sufficient lor the plaintiff, in this kind of action, to show that the suit has terminated in his favor; but he must further- ’ more sustain, by additional proof, the essential allega*426tion-, that the suit was *maliciously*prosecuted, without probable cause. Of course, it is competent for the defendant to prove,. there was no malice, and that there was probable cause.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and cause remanded with instructions for a new trial, and further proceedings consistent herewith.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Recovery Planning for Schools and Institutions of Higher Education in the Immediate Aftermath of a Significant or Federally Declared Natural Disaster       

# Resource: Recovery Planning for Schools and Institutions of Higher Education in the Immediate Aftermath of a Significant or Federally Declared Natural Disaster 

This fact sheet (PDF, 3 pages) outlines information and resources to support schools and institutions of higher education in their recovery planning efforts in the immediate aftermath of a community-wide disaster.**Learn more**(PDF, 3 pages).
#### § 1734.9 Grant and loan administration.

RUS will conduct reviews as necessary to determine whether the financial assistance was expended for approved purposes. The recipient is responsible for ensuring that the project complies with all applicable regulations, and that the grants and loans are expended only for approved purposes. The recipient is responsible for ensuring that disbursements and expenditures of funds are properly supported by invoices, contracts, bills of sale, canceled checks, or other appropriate forms of evidence, and that such supporting material is provided to RUS, upon request, and is otherwise made available, at the recipient's premises, for review by the RUS representatives, the recipient's certified public accountant, the Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Agriculture, the General Accounting Office, and any other official conducting an audit of the recipient's financial statements or records, and program performance for the grants and loans made under this subpart. The recipient shall permit RUS to inspect and copy any records and documents that pertain to the project.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 26, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135234 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135234 

 COA: 269574 

Macomb CC: 2005-003245-FC 

ANTHONY JEROME DELEON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 18, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0319 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 26, 2008 

 Clerk
§ 1773.5 Qualifications of the auditor. Auditors must meet the qualifications criteria of this section and enter into an audit engagement with the auditee that complies with § 1773.6 to be considered satisfactory to RUS. ( a ) *Licensing.* Auditors that audit the financial statements of an RUS auditee must be licensed to perform attestation engagements in the United States of America. Auditors do not have to be licensed by the state in which the auditee is located; however, auditors must abide by the rules and regulations of professional conduct promulgated by the accountancy board of the state in which the auditee is located.
( b ) *Independence.* Auditors must be independent as determined by the standards for independence in the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and in GAGAS in effect at the time of the audit.
( c ) *Peer review requirement.* Auditors must be enrolled in and comply with the requirements of an approved peer review program and must have undergone a satisfactory peer review of their accounting and audit practice. The peer review must be in effect at the date of the audit report opinion.
( d ) *Peer review reports.* RUS or its designated representative reserves the right to request peer review reports from selected auditors, including evidence indicating actions taken to correct deficiencies identified in the peer review report, if applicable.
[83 FR 19907, May 7, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 7564, Feb. 6, 2023]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Robert W. Hagger,certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Datawatch Corporation;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   [Paragraphomitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release34-47986.]

 

(c)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: December 12, 2005

 
|   | /s/ Robert W. Hagger                |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert W. Hagger                    |
|   | President, Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | and Director                        |

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS HYP-8 DEM Data Over The NSA-MSA and SSA-MSA in The AEAC ProjectionThese data were derived from the original Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) produced by the Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) Hydrology (HYD)-8 team. The original DEMs were in the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection, while this product is projected in the Albers Equal-Area Conic (AEAC) projection. The pixel size of the data is 100 meters, which is appropriate for the 1:50,000-scale contours from which the DEMs were made. The original data were compiled from information available in the 1970s and 1980s. This data set covers the two Modeling Sub-Areas (MSAs) that are contained within the Southern Study Area (SSA) and the Northern Study Area (NSA). The data are stored in binary, image format files. The DEM data over the NSA-MSA and SSA-MSA in the AEAC projection are available from the Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC). The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884).Document ID20000116634Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKnapp, David E.*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Hall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Wang, Xue-Wen*(Toronto Univ. Ontario Canada)*Band, L. E.*(Toronto Univ. Ontario Canada)*Smith, David E.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL37NAS 1.15:209891/VOL37Rept-2000-03136-0/VOL37Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000116634.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024