alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Blue Dolphin Energy Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ivar
Siem, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Ivar Siem
-------------------------------------
Ivar Siem
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

March 30, 2006


                                       67
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option and Restricted Performance Unit Agreements



 Exhibit 10.11(1) 
  

			
	Account No.	  	Option No.
	 «TAXID»
 «NQ_OPTION_NO»
	  	 

  
 UNITED PARCEL
SERVICE, INC. 
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT 
 (Not Transferable) 
  
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT «EE_NAME2» has been granted a non-qualified stock option to purchase «NQ_SHARES_AWARDED» shares of the Class A common stock of UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a Delaware corporation, at
a price of «STRIKE_PRICE» per share. 
  
 This option is granted
under and pursuant to the United Parcel Service, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan, (the “Plan”), and is subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in the Plan Document as the same may be amended from time to time. All of the terms
and provisions of the Plan, as set forth in the Plan Document and the Participant Brochure/Prospectus (“Governing Documents”), are incorporated herein by reference and shall govern with respect to the specific terms and conditions under
which this option is granted. 
  
 THIS OPTION SHALL EXPIRE AND BE VOID AND SHALL
NOT BE EXERCISABLE AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE HEREOF, AND MAY BE EXERCISED ONLY IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN THE GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. 
  
 This option is not transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. has caused this Stock Option to be issued as of May 3, 2004. 
  

					
	 ATTEST:
	 	 	 	 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

			
	  	 	 	 	  
	Secretary	 	 	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

  
 «RRDD»

 «DEPT» 
  










			
	Account No.	 	RPU No.
	 «TAXID».
	 	 «RPU_NO».


  
 UNITED PARCEL
SERVICE, INC. 
 RESTRICTED PERFORMANCE UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT 
 (Not Transferable) 
  
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT «EE_NAME2» has been granted «RPU_INITIAL_SHARES_AWARDED» Restricted Performance Units. Each performance unit has a value which equals the value of one share of the Class A common
stock of UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a Delaware corporation. 
  
 This award is
granted under and pursuant to the United Parcel Service, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), and is subject to the conditions and limitations set forth in the Plan document as the same may be amended from time to time. All of
the terms and provisions of the Plan, as set forth in the Plan document and the Participant Brochure/Prospectus (“Governing Documents”), are incorporated herein by reference and shall govern with respect to the specific terms and
conditions under which this award is granted. 
  
 This award is not transferable
except by will or the laws of descent and distribution. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. has caused this Restricted Performance Unit Award to be issued as of May 3, 2004. 
  

					
	 ATTEST:
	 	 	 	 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

			
	  	 	 	 	  
	Secretary	 	 	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

  
 «RRDD»

 «DEPT»
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended May 31, 2009 (the  "Report") by Futura
Pictures, Inc. ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.




July 15, 2009                     By:  /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                       ---------------------------------
                                       Buddy Young
                                       Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                       Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1437.309 Turfgrass sod. ( a ) Turfgrass sod is a value loss crop and is the upper stratum of soil bound by mature grass and plant roots into a thick mat produced in commercial quantities for sale.
( b ) Specific species, types or varieties of grass intended for turfgrass sod will be considered a separate crop without regard to other intended uses.
( c ) The unit of measure for all turfgrass sod is a square yard.
( d ) Turfgrass sod having any value will be considered as worth full value.
( e ) In addition to the records required in § 1437.8, producers seeking payment must provide information to FSA regarding the average number of square yards per acre and all unharvested areas.
[67 FR 12448, Mar. 19, 2002, as amended at 79 FR 74582, 74583, Dec. 15, 2014]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1518

EVODIA KAH TABOH,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. 

Submitted: March 17, 2008 Decided: July 14, 2008

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Nkwenti, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner.

Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Barry J. Pettinato,

Assistant Director, Kristin A. Moresi, Office of Immigration

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Evodia Kah Taboh, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“Board”) dismissing her appeal from the immigration

judge’s order finding her removable and denying her applications

for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

Convention Against Torture. We deny the petition for review. 

We have reviewed the administrative record, the

immigration judge’s decision, and the Board’s affirmance thereof,

and find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s ruling that

Taboh failed to establish a nexus between the alleged persecution

and a protected ground. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2007) (stating

that burden of proof is on alien to establish eligibility for

asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same).

Such a causal nexus is required to support the grant of asylum. 8

U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (2000); Saldarriaga v. Gonzales, 402 F.3d

461, 466 (4th Cir. 2005). 

Moreover, as Taboh cannot sustain her burden on the

asylum claim, she cannot establish her entitlement to withholding

of removal. See Camara v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir.

2004) (“Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is

higher than for asylum — even though the facts that must be proved

are the same — an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is

necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8
- 3 -

U.S.C.A.] § 1231(b)(3) [(West 2005)].”). In addition, we uphold

the finding that Taboh failed to establish that it was more likely

than not that she would be tortured if removed to Cameroon. See 8

C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2007).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
§ 1735.51 Required findings. ( a ) *Feasibility of and security for the Loan.* The borrower shall provide RUS with satisfactory evidence to enable the Administrator to determine that the security for the loan is reasonably adequate and the loan will be repaid on time. This finding is based on the following factors: ( 1 ) Self-liquidation of the loan within the loan amortization period; this requires that there be sufficient revenues from the borrower's system, in excess of operating expenditures (including maintenance and replacement), to repay the loan with interest.
( 2 ) Reasonable assurance of achieving the telephone market projections upon which the loan is based.
( 3 ) Economic feasibility (based on projected revenues, expenses, net income, maximum debt service, and rate of return on investment) for the proposed system using local service rate schedules appropriate for the area served.
( 4 ) Impact of the proposed loan and construction on the ratio of the borrower's secured debt to assets.
( 5 ) Projected growth in the borrower's equity.
( 6 ) Satisfactory experience and reputation of the system's principal owners and manager.
( 7 ) A first lien on the borrower's total system or other adequate security.
( 8 ) Fair market value of the borrower's assets as represented in its financial reports to RUS.
( 9 ) Appropriate financial and managerial controls included in the loan documents.
( 10 ) Other factors determined to be relevant by RUS.
( b ) *Area coverage.* The borrower shall provide RUS with satisfactory evidence to enable the Administrator to determine that adequate telephone service will be made available to the widest practical number of rural users during the life of the loan.
( c ) *Nonduplication or certificate requirement.* The borrower shall provide RUS with satisfactory evidence to enable the Administrator to determine that no duplication of telephone service shall result from a particular loan.
[54 FR 13351, Apr. 3, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39395, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 26598, June 10, 1991; 86 FR 50609, Sept. 10, 2021]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Principal Attrition and Mobility: Results From the 2021–22 Principal Follow-up Survey to the National Teacher and Principal Survey      

# Report: Principal Attrition and Mobility: Results From the 2021–22 Principal Follow-up Survey to the National Teacher and Principal Survey

This report (PDF, 65 pages) provides new information from the 2021–22 Principal Follow-up Survey (PFS) about attrition and mobility of public and private K–12 school principals during the 2021-22 school year. The report also provides information on principal attrition and mobility by selected principal and school characteristics, plans to remain a principal, working conditions, school climate, and principals’ perceived influence on decisions at their school. **Learn more.**
§ 1786.60 Closing. ( a ) The borrower shall be responsible for obtaining all approvals necessary to consummate the transaction as required by the prepayment agreement including such approvals as may be required by regulatory bodies and other lenders.
( b ) The RUS Notes shall be prepaid at a closing to be held in accordance with the prepayment agreement; *Provided, however,* That no closing may be scheduled for after September 30, 1987. At closing, a borrower shall prepay the RUS Notes by paying to the Government an amount equal to the Discounted Present Value of the RUS Notes. The closing shall otherwise be conducted as prescribed in the prepayment agreement.
#### § 1717.1207 RUS obligations under loan guarantees.

Nothing in this subpart affects the obligations of RUS under loan guarantee commitments it has made to the Federal Financing Bank or other lenders.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1421.306 Refunds; joint and several liability. ( a ) In the event there is a failure to comply with any term, requirement, or condition for payment arising under this application, of this subpart, and if any refund of a payment to CCC becomes due for that or other reason in connection with the application, of this subpart, all payments made under this subpart to any producer are to be refunded to CCC together with interest as determined in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section and late-payment charges as provided for in part 1402 of this chapter.
( b ) All persons listed on an application are jointly and severally liable for any refund due in connection with that application and for any related charges which may be determined to be due for any reason.
( c ) Interest is applicable to refunds required from the producer. Interest will be charged at the rate of interest which the United States Treasury charges CCC for funds, as of the date CCC made such benefits available. Interest will accrue from the date such benefits were made available to the date of repayment but the interest rate will increase to reflect any increase in the rate charged to CCC by Treasury for any percent of time for which the interest assessment is collected. CCC may waive the accrual of interest if CCC determines that the cause of the erroneous determination was not due to any action of the producer.
( d ) Late payment interest will be assessed on refunds in accordance with the provisions of, and subject to the rates in part 1403 of this chapter.
( e ) Producers must refund to CCC any excess payments made by CCC with respect to any application in which they have an interest. Such refund will be subject to interest at the same rate that applies to other refunds.
[66 FR 13404, Mar. 6, 2001. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 15656, Apr. 7, 2009; 80 FR 128, 130, Jan. 2, 2015]
M. P. No. 79-462.

#### In the Matter of Norma M.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

*901Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.

*Stephen C. Bridge,*Assistant Public Defender, for petitioner, *Chester Lupton,*Legal Counsel, Child Welfare Services, for respondents.
**Exhibit 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Directed Electronics, Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald F. Dutt, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                 /s/ Ronald F. Dutt   Ronald F. Dutt  Date: May 10, 2007 Chief Financial Officer
§ 1900.56 Non-appealable decisions. The following are examples of decisions which are not appealable: ( a ) Decisions which do not fall within the scope of this subpart as set out in § 1900.53.
( b ) Decisions that do not meet the definition of an “adverse decision” under 7 CFR part 11.
( c ) Decisions involving parties who do not meet the definition of “participant” under 7 CFR part 11.
( d ) Decisions with subject matters not covered by 7 CFR part 11.
( e ) Interest rates as set forth in agency procedures, except for appeals alleging application of an incorrect interest rate.
( f ) The State RECD Director's refusal to request an administrative waiver provided for in agency program regulations.
( g ) Denials of assistance due to lack of funds or authority to guarantee.
#### § 160.70 Rendition of claims.

As soon as practicable after the end of each month, or sooner if deemed advisable, there shall be mailed to each interested person at whose request any services have been performed, a claim for payment of moneys due the United States for the services rendered or for the loan or repair of any standards.

[11 FR 14665, Dec. 27, 1946, as amended at 17 FR 221, Jan. 9, 1952; 20 FR 6433, Sept. 1, 1955. Redesignated at 46 FR 47055, Sept. 24, 1981, as amended at 47 FR 3345, Jan. 25, 1982]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1855 

To require the Secretary of Defense to establish a process to determine 

whether individuals claiming certain service in the Philippines during 

World War II are eligible for certain benefits despite not being on 

the Missouri List, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2013 

Ms. HANABUSA (for herself, Ms. CHU, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. 

MORAN, Ms. NORTON, Ms. GABBARD, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. BRADY

of Pennsylvania, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. HECK of Nevada, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, Mr. HONDA, Mr. PETERS of California, and Mr. TAKANO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to establish a process 

to determine whether individuals claiming certain service 

in the Philippines during World War II are eligible for 

certain benefits despite not being on the Missouri List, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1855 IH

1 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF CERTAIN SERVICE IN 

2 PHILIPPINES DURING WORLD WAR II. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, in con4 sultation with the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and such 

5 military historians as the Secretary of Defense considers 

6 appropriate, shall establish a process to determine whether 

7 a covered individual served as described in subsection (a) 

8 or (b) of section 107 of title 38, United States Code, for 

9 purposes of determining whether such covered individual 

10 is eligible for benefits described in such subsections. 

11 (b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS.—For purposes of this 

12 section, a covered individual is any individual who— 

13 (1) claims service described in subsection (a) or 

14 (b) of section 107 of title 38, United States Code; 

15 and 

16 (2) is not included in the Approved Revised Re17 constructed Guerilla Roster of 1948, known as the 

18 ‘‘Missouri List’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Errata for SP 800-60 – Volume II 

Appendixes to Guide for Mapping Types of Information and 

Information Systems to Security Categories 

Date Section, Page Change 

3/20/06 Table 3, Pg.21 Correct the Confidentiality impact level to “Low”, for the 

“IT Infrastructure Maintenance” Information Type 

3/20/06 Table 3, Pg. 21 Correct the Confidentiality impact level to “Low” for the 

“Information Management” Information Type 

3/20/06 C.3.5.4, Pg 109 Correct the Confidentiality impact level to “Low” in the 

security category equation for the “IT infrastructure 

maintenance” information type 

3/20/06 c.3.5.4, Pg 110 §2 Replace the last sentence of the “Recommended 

Confidentiality Impact Level” with: “Although an 

individual organization’s IT Infrastructure maintenance 

information type base may include data elements that will 

require a higher rating, the recommended provisional 

impact level is “low” 

3/20/06 C.3.5.7, Pg 113 Correct the Confidentiality impact level to “Low” in the 

security category equation for the “Information 

Management” information type 

3/20/06 C.3.5.7, Pg 114 §4 Replace the last sentence of the “Recommended 

Confidentiality Impact Level” with: “Although an 

individual organization’s Information Management 

information type base may include data elements that will 

require a higher rating, the recommended provisional 

impact level is “low”