alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.25 

**AMENDMENT TO THE**

**HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.**

**2006 OUTSIDE DIRECTOR RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD PLAN**

WHEREAS, Health Management Associates, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted and maintains that certain 2006 Outside Director Restricted Stock Award Plan (the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, in connection with the recapitalization of the Company which took place in March 2007 and pursuant to Section 11 of the Plan,the number of shares under the Annual Grant provisions set forth in Section 5(b) of the Plan was previously increased from 3,500 to 12,000; and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to increase the number of shares subject to the Annual Grant provision from 12,000 to 20,000, effective January 1, 2010; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of January 1, 2010, as follows: 

1. Section 5(b) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows: 

“(b) Annual Grants. Commencing January 1, 2010, each person who is an Outside Director on January 1stof each year will automatically be granted a Restricted Stock Award with respect to 20,000 shares of Common Stock, and the Grant Date with respect to each such Restricted Stock Award will be the date on which the award is granted. If onJanuary 1 of any year there is not a sufficient number of shares of Common Stock necessary for all Outside Directors to receive a Restricted Stock Award pursuant to this Section 5(b), no grants shall be made for such year under thePlan.” 

2. Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

***This Amendment was authorized, approved and adopted in accordance with the terms of the Plan on December 1, 2009.***
#### Mart K. Halpern et al., Respondents, v. Niagara Frontier Transit System, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied, upon condition that appellant comply with the terms of the order entered hereon. Memorandum: Special Term and counsel for respondents have construed too broadly the language contained in our prior order modifying the order of October 19, 1965. Reports and statements were to be limited to those “made and submitted” by employees. Photographs “taken and submitted” were also to be made available. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term striking answer conditionally.) Present— Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1930-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for State of Iowa (FEMA-1930-DR), dated July 29, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         November 3, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, John E. Long, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Thomas A. Hall as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-28838 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 1956

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1956.148 Exception authority.

The Administrator may make an exception to any requirement or provision of this subpart which is not inconsistent with the authorizing statute or other applicable law if the Administrator determines that application of the requirement or provision would adversely affect the Government's interest. Requests for exceptions must be made in writing by the State Director and supported with documentation to explain the adverse effect on the Government's interest, propose alternative courses of action, and show how the adverse effect will be eliminated or minimized if the exception is granted. Any settlement actions approved by the Administrator under this section will be documented on Form RD 1956-1 and returned to the State Office for submission to the Finance Office.
§ 1738.106 Public notice. ( a ) The Agency will publish a public notice of each application requesting assistance under this part. The application must provide a summary of the information required for such public notice including all of the following information: ( 1 ) The identity of the Applicant;
( 2 ) A map of each proposed funded service area showing the rural area boundaries and the areas without broadband service using the Agency's mapping tool;
( 3 ) The amount and type of support requested;
( 4 ) The estimated number of households in each proposed funded service area without broadband service, excluding mobile and satellite service; and
( 5 ) A description of all the types of services that the Applicant proposes to offer in each proposed funded service area.
( b ) The public notice will remain available for 45 calendar days on the Agency's website, and will request existing service providers to submit to the Agency, within the same period, the following information: ( 1 ) The number of residential and business customers within the Applicant's proposed funded service area that are currently offered, and that are purchasing, broadband service by the existing service provider, and the cost of each level of broadband service charged by the existing service provider;
( 2 ) The number of residential and business customers within the Applicant's proposed funded service area that receive non-broadband services from the existing service provider, and the associated rates for these other services; and
( 3 ) A map showing where the existing service provider's services coincide with the Applicant's proposed funded service area using the Agency's mapping tool.
( c ) For purposes of 5 U.S.C. 552, information received from existing service providers under paragraph (b) of this section shall be exempt from disclosure.
( d ) If an application is approved, an additional notice will be published on the Agency's website that will include the following information: ( 1 ) The name of the entity receiving the financial assistance;
( 2 ) The amount and type of assistance being received;
( 3 ) The purpose of the assistance; and
( 4 ) Each annual report submitted under § 1738.107, redacted as appropriate to protect any proprietary information in the report.
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>



   In connection with the Annual Report of Quantum MRI, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Kelly Fielder, the President and the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                    By: /s/ Kelly Fielder
                                       -----------------------------------
                                        Kelly Fielder, President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer


December 2, 2005
#### In the Matter of Yolanda McCombs, Appellant, v Alice Sachs et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Earley B. Viverette, Respondent. In the Matter of Earley B. Viverette, Respondent, v Yolanda McCombs, Appellant, and Frank X. Gargiulo et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents.

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County, each entered on April 3, 1980, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Ross, J. P., Markewich, Lupiano, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
#### GAGE, Respondent, v. BLOOMQUIST, et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 16, 1906.)

Action by Marcus D. Gage against Otto L. Bloomquist and another.

PER OTJRIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

NASH, J., dissents, on authority of Dillon v. National Coal Tar Company, 181 N. Y. 215, 73 N. E. 978.
p100005.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: Yes

PMN: 10-0005

Focus Ready Draft 12/17/2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 1
p100005.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 2
p100005.eng

 

 

 

Page 3
p100005.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 4
p100005.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 5
p100005.eng

Page 6
p100005.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 7
p100005.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 8
p100005.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 9
p100005.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 10
p100005.eng

 

 

Page 11
p100005.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 12
p100005.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 13
p100005.eng

 

 

 

 

 

Page 14
p100005.eng

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 15
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# Time and Date:

 Wednesday, November 17, 2010; 2 p.m.-3 p.m.

# Place:

 Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# Status:

 Closed to the Public.

# Matter To Be Considered:

## Compliance Status Report

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: November 9, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-28785 Filed 11-10-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1430.424 Violations of highly erodible and wetland conservation provisions.

The provisions of 7 CFR part 12 apply to this part.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of William J. Hurley, Respondent, v. E. R. Wolcott, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board granting claimant an award for 100% loss of vision in his right eye. Claimant sustained a work-connected injury to his right eye which required surgery, as a result of which all of the experts agree claimant suffered a 100% loss of vision. There is also unanimity by said experts, however, that, except for a partial loss of binocular vision which loss is clearly not compensable *(Matter of Gainey*v. *Warren Nash Motor Corp.,*231 App. Div. 768) by the use of a corrective lens claimant’s vision was at least substantially restored. (The experts were divided as to the extent of loss if any but were unanimous that such loss was less than the 80% loss required by Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 3, par. p, for total loss.) As a general rule, a loss of vision which can be corrected to normal with glasses is not compensable as a scheduled award *(Matter of McNamara*v. *McHarg, Barton Co.,*200 App. Div. 188). Where the correction possible is less than 100%, the extent thereof, without undue discomfort, is determinative of the amount of the award *(Matter of Walton*v. *Leach Steel Corp.,*15 A D 2d 975). The board, apparently recognizing these rules, held that claimant was, nevertheless, entitled to a 100% award because of the discomfort he experienced in wearing contact lenses on the job. We cannot accept the applicability of this position in the instant case. It is true that claimant testified that because of the dust created in his work on road construction, his eye would become irritated and he would have to remove the contact lens; that as an estimate he wore the lens only about 50% of the time on the job; and that he could not as an alternative use his glasses on the job because he would “fall all over everything.” However, there is absolutely no indication that claimant because he was unable to wear the corrective lenses provided was prevented from performing his job or suffering any diminution in earnings as a result thereof. In fact, the record reveals that on the day prior to the hearing before the Referee claimant worked 11 hours, 7 without aid of corrective lenses. As this court in *Matter of McNamara*v. *McHarg, Barton Co. (supra)*noted, the wearing of glasses always brings some inconvenience. Mere inconvenience, however, without an effect on earning capacity is not enough to support an award whereas here there is no question that off the job his sight has been substantially restored, without undue discomfort. Accordingly, the case must be returned to the board to determine the extent of partial loss sustained, if any. Decision reversed, and matter remitted for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith, with costs to appellants against the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in memorandum decision by Reynolds, J.; Aulisi, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
Exhibit 10.14 Summary of Policy of Directors fees



Exhibit
10.14




Heartland
Financial USA, Inc.

POLICY
ON DIRECTOR FEES




ADOPTED
BY HEARTLAND BOARD OF DIRECTORS JANUARY 18, 2005




Heartland
Financial USA, Inc. will pay fees under the following schedule to its
non-employee directors for each board of directors and committee meetings
attended:




Regular
board meeting $800.00

Committee
meeting $500.00

 

The
director acting as Chairman of the board of directors or committee meeting will
be paid an additional $250.00 for the meeting chaired.




Non-employee
directors are also eligible to receive incentive stock awards under the 2003
Stock Option Plan. 

 

POLICY
ON EXPENSE REIMBURSMENT FOR DIRECTORS




ADOPTED
BY HEARTLAND BOARD OF DIRECTORS JULY 20, 2004




Heartland
Financial USA, Inc. will reimburse its non-employee directors for reasonable
expenses incurred for board of directors’ and committee meetings and for
traveling on other Heartland business. This policy contains guidelines that
explain the types of expenses that are reimbursable and instructions for
requesting reimbursement. 

 

TRANSPORTATION

Directors
traveling for a Heartland board of directors’ or committee meeting will be
reimbursed at the allowable cents per mile as established by the Internal
Revenue Service based on mileage from their home to the meeting location. If the
director travels by any other means of transportation (bus, train, air),
submission of the receipt will be required. The director will also be reimbursed
for parking fees, tolls and/or cab fares incurred while attending Heartland
board of directors’ and committee meetings.




LODGING
& MEALS

Lodging
- The cost
of overnight accommodations incurred in connection with Heartland board of
directors’ or committee meetings will be reimbursed. Submission of a hotel
invoice or credit card slip with the hotel name stated will be required.


 

Meals - All
interim meals and restaurant gratuities incurred in the course of travel to the
Heartland board of directors’ or committee meetings will be reimbursed. The meal
reimbursement will be limited to normal and reasonable meal costs. Heartland’s
president and CEO will make the final decision on the reasonableness of the meal
costs submitted for reimbursement.

 

Telephone -
Charges for telephone calls made in conjunction with a Heartland board of
directors’ or committee meeting may be submitted for reimbursement. A copy of
the phone bill delineating the specific charges will be required.

 

REIMBURSEMENT

All
requests for reimbursement of allowable expenses shall be submitted in writing
to the Heartland Financial USA, Inc. Administration Department, who will process
and submit the request to the Accounts Payable Department. Expenses submitted
for reimbursement must be supported with detailed documentation as specified
above.
#### §§ 1230.501-1230.512 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70030-70031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28559]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open SystemC Initiative

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 14, 2010, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open SystemC Initiative 
(``OSCI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Kasura Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore, INDIA, 
has been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and OSCI intends

[[Page 70031]]

to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On October 9, 2001, OSCI filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
January 3, 2002 (67 FR 350).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 4, 
2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 14, 2010 (75 FR 40852)

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-28559 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**EXHIBIT** **32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION** **906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Lynn A. Peterson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: | May 10, 2007 |  
By:

/s/ Lynn A. Peterson

 
 

______________________________________

 

Lynn A Peterson

 
 

Chief Executive Officer and

 
 

Principal Financial Officer

 
 

  |
|-------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|