alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1828 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

extend public safety officers’ death benefits to fire police officers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2013 

Mr. COURTNEY (for himself, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. HIMES, 

Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. TONKO, and Ms. ESTY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to extend public safety officers’ death benefits to fire police officers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fire Police Fairness 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENDING PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER DEATH BENE7 FITS TO FIRE POLICE. 

8 Section 1204 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

9 Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b) is amended— 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1828 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (5) through 

2 (9) as paragraphs (6) through (10), respectively; 

3 (2) in paragraph (10)(A) (as so redesignated by 

4 paragraph (1) of this section), by inserting ‘‘as a 

5 fire police officer,’’ after ‘‘firefighter,’’; and 

6 (3) by inserting after paragraph (4) the fol7 lowing new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(5) ‘fire police officer’ includes an individual 

9 who— 

10 ‘‘(A) is serving in accordance with State or 

11 local law as an officially recognized or des12 ignated member of a legally organized public 

13 safety agency but is not a law enforcement offi14 cer, a firefighter, a chaplain, or a member of a 

15 rescue squad or ambulance crew described in 

16 paragraph (10)(A); and 

17 ‘‘(B) provides scene security or directs 

18 traffic— 

19 ‘‘(i) in response to any fire drill, fire 

20 call, or other fire, rescue, or police emer21 gency; or 

22 ‘‘(ii) at a planned special event;’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 1767.68 Designation of a supervisory official.

Each borrower shall designate one or more officials to supervise the preservation of its records.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.6
 AMENDMENT TO  CONSULTING AGREEMENT
 Amendment
 Agreement
 Section 6.6
  1.
    
    The recital in Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:Duties and Obligations of Consultant. Consultant shall (i) provide advice and
counsel on business planning and strategy, including, among other things, (a) monitoring
merger and acquisition activity, (b) identifying potential acquisition targets, (c) advising
on the structure of potential transactions, and (d) providing negotiating assistance; and
(ii) provide reports to Colemans Board of Directors regarding these activities.2.
    
    The recital in Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:Consulting Fees. In consideration of the Consultant providing the designated services
for Coleman as set forth herein, Coleman agrees to pay the Consultant an annual fee in the amount
of $175,000, payable quarterly, beginning July 1, 2006.3.
    
    The recital in Section 5.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety
and replaced with the following:Term. The engagement of the Consultant shall continue for a term commencing on July
1, 2006 and ending on June 30, 2007 (the Term).4.
    
    The recital in Section 5.2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety
and replaced with the following:Termination. Beginning on July 1, 2006, the term of this Agreement shall be extended
automatically from year to year, subject to termination by either party upon thirty (30)




---



##### 



days written notice. Upon termination, all sections of this Agreement (other than sections
1.3 and 6.10) shall terminate, unless both parties mutually agree otherwise in writing.5.
    
    The provisions of the Agreement that have not been amended hereby shall remain in full
force and effect. The provisions of the Agreement amended hereby shall remain in full
force and effect as amended.6.
    
    This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
 Signature Page Follows
 2




---



##### 



CONSULTANT/s/ Nachum SteinNachum SteinCOLEMAN CABLE, INC./s/ Richard N. BurgerRichard N. BurgerExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 10.7

                       ISRAEL TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION CORP.




                                                     ______________, 2005

A.F. Services Ltd.
23 Karlibach St.
Tel Aviv 67132
Israel

Gentlemen:

         This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the
effective date ("Effective Date") of the registration statement for the initial
public offering ("IPO") of the securities of Israel Technology Acquisition Corp.
("ITAC") and continuing until (the "Termination Date") the earlier of the
consummation by ITAC of a "Business Combination" or ITAC's liquidation (as
described in ITAC's IPO prospectus), A.F. Services Ltd. shall make available to
ITAC certain office and secretarial services as may be required by ITAC from
time to time, situated at 23 Karlibach St., Tel Aviv 67132, Israel. In exchange
therefore, ITAC shall pay A.F. Services Ltd. the sum of $7,500 per month on the
Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date.

                                       Very truly yours,


                                       ISRAEL TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION CORP.



                                       By:  ________________________________
                                            Name:  Israel Frieder
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer

AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

A.F. SERVICES LTD.


By:  _________________
     Name:
     Title:
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10919.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10919.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### MOLITERNO, Appellant, v. VAUGHN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by Pietro Molitemo, as administrator, etc., against Jehiel Vaughn.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
§ 1900.102 Applicable law. Loans made by Rural Development are authorized and executed pursuant to Federal programs adopted by Congress to achieve national purposes of the U.S. Government. ( a ) Instruments evidencing or securing a loan payable to or held by the Rural Development, such as promissory notes, bonds, guaranty agreements, mortgages, deeds of trust, financing statements, security agreements, and other evidences of debt or security shall be construed and enforced in accordance with applicable Federal law.
( b ) Instruments evidencing a guarantee, conditional commitment to guarantee, or a grant, such as contracts of guarantee, grant agreements or other evidences of an obligation to guarantee or make a grant, executed by the Rural Development, shall be construed and enforced in accordance with applicable Federal law.
( c ) In order to implement and facilitate these Federal loan programs, the application of local procedures, especially for recordation and notification purposes, may be utilized to the fullest extent feasible and practicable. However, the use of local procedures shall not be deemed or construed to be any waiver by Rural Development of Federal immunity from any local control, penalty, or liability, or to subject Rural Development to any State required acts or actions subsequent to the delivery by Rural Development officials of the instrument to the appropriate local or State official.
( d ) Any person, corporation, or organization that applies for and receives any benefit or assistance from Rural Development that offers any assurance or security upon which Rural Development relies for the granting of such benefit or assistance, shall not be entitled to claim or assert any local immunity, privilege, or exemption to defeat the obligation such party incurred in obtaining or assuring such Federal benefit or assistance.
( e ) The liability of an auctioneer for conversion of personal property mortgaged to Rural Development shall be determined and enforced in acceptance with the applicable Federal law. “Auctioneer” for the purposes of this subpart includes a commission merchant, market agency, factor or agent. In all cases in which there has been a disposition without authorization by Rural Development of personal property mortgaged to that agency, any auctioneer involved in said disposition shall be liable to the Government for conversion—notwithstanding any State statute or decisional rule to the contrary.
[44 FR 10979, Feb. 26, 1979, as amended at 80 FR 9867, Feb. 24, 2015]
1 Mears, Gilbert

From: Dwaltersrn@aol.com

Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 5:19 PM

To: Mears, Gilbert Subject: Importance of reporting toxins

Docket #: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281

Dear Mr mears

How am I to test my water before fracking if I don't know what to test for? How can I monitor my cistern water from air pollutants if I don't know what to test for?

It is stupid to allow them to dump carcinogens and who know what into the ground water..If it is ok why can't they say what it is...or why can't yo u seize it and test it..loopholes to make me pay the consequence and clean up while they reap the profits..

Please make them prove and disclose wh at they are doing to my water and air.

Dianne Walters Irwin, Penna.
**EXHIBIT 31.01**
CERTIFICATION
I, Ronald L. Turner, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CeridianCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date:  March 15, 2004 /s/ Ronald L. Turner   Ronald L. Turner   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1468.7 Transfer of land. ( a ) *Offers voided.* Any transfer of the property prior to recording the easement in the applicable land records or executing the 30-year contract may void the availability of ACEP funding for that transaction, unless the new landowner is determined eligible, the transfer is approved by NRCS, and the new landowner is willing to comply with ACEP requirements.
( b ) *Payments to participants.* For wetland reserve easements with annual installment payments, any remaining easement payments will be made to the original participants unless NRCS receives an assignment of proceeds.
( c ) *Claims to payments.* With respect to any and all payments owed to participants, NRCS will bear no responsibility for any full payments or partial distributions of funds between the original participant and the participant's successor. In the event of a dispute or claim on the distribution of payments, NRCS may withhold payments without the accrual of interest pending an agreement or adjudication on the rights to the funds.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28374]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
USC, as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Clinical Treatment and Health 
Services Research Review Subcommittee.
    Date: March 15-16, 2011.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Katrina Foster, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 2019, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-443-4032, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7dcd6c3c5ded9d6d1f7dad6dedb99d9dedf99d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="254e4451574c4b44436548444c490b4b4c4d0b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: November 3, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-28374 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| **Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Parenthetical) - $ / shares** | 6 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                 |           |   |
| Cash Dividends per share (in dollars per share)                                  | $ 0.20         | $ 0.36 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends paid during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=27012166&loc=d3e187085-122770
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareCashPaid**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
#### § 1775.31 Authorization.

This subpart sets forth additional policies and procedures for making Technical Assistance and Training (TAT) grants authorized under Section 306(a)(14)(A) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (CONACT) (7 U.S.C. 1921 *et seq.,* as amended.
#### Horace HOUSTON, Jr., Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2007-7098.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 4, 2007.

Horace Houston, Jr., pro se.

Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and PROST, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) and to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Horace Houston, Jr.’s appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Houston did not respond.

Houston appealed to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims from an April 15, 2005, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals that denied him entitlement to (1) an increased disability rating for his service-connected residuals of fracture, right patella, status post open reduction and internal fixation, currently rated at 30%; (2) an increased initial disability rating in excess of 10% for his service-connected patel-lo-femoral syndrome of the left knee; and (3) an increased initial disability rating in excess of 10% for his service-connected degenerative joint disease of the left hip. The court held that the Board’s degree of disability determinations were factual and plausible in light of the record on appeal.

The Secretary argues that Houston’s informal brief does not raise an issue that falls within this court’s jurisdiction. We agree. Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court has limited jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. *See Forshey v. Principi,*284 F.3d 1335, 1338 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en banc). This court “may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case.” 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2).

*990In his brief, Houston does not raise a constitutional, statutory or regulatory issue. Williams challenges only the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ review of the Board’s factual determinations. Thus, this court does not have jurisdiction over the appeal. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Secretary’s motion to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir. R. 27(f) is granted.

(2) The Secretary’s motion to dismiss is granted.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-13-00559-CV

Style: Automation Wash Ltd.

v Harris County Appraisal District

Dates motions filed*: June 28, 2013

Type of motion: Motion to extend time to file notice of appeal

Party filing motion: Appellant 

Document to be filed: Notice of Appeal

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: June 13, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Current Due date: June 13, 2013

Date Requested: June 27, 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: June 27, 2013

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: July 16, 2013
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Raymond J.Spencer, Chief Executive Officer of Kanbay International, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify that:

(1)             TheCompany’s annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the period endedDecember 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)             The informationcontained in the Form 10-K, as amended, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company forthe periods presented therein.
| /s/ RAYMOND J. SPENCER    |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Raymond J. Spencer        |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |
| November 28, 2006         |

 

----
Unable to locate a United States Sentencing Commission "Guide to Publications & Resources" for 2008 - 2009. May not have been created as it appears that publication has stopped being annual.