alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          33,171
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                95,221
<PP&E>                                           7,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,731
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,626
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (698,704)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,156,928)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**The undersigned officers of **Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.**hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 1. the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Standard AeroHoldings, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of United Components, Inc.     Date:May 12, 2006           By: /s/ David Shaw      Name: David Shaw  Title: Chief Executive Officer     Date:May 12, 2006           By: /s/ Bradley Bertouille      Name: Bradley Bertouille  Title: Chief Financial OfficerThe foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
.

^



# ^Cangre gg of tfje 'Eniteb *tate!5

^)ouoe ot Repreantatibeg Maoingtott, IDC 20515 December 10, 2013

The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 Dear Administrator McCarthy: We are writing regarding the proposed 2014 renewable volume obligations (RVOs) under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). When Congress expanded the RFS in 2007, it committed to advancing our nation's alternative fuel industry to promote energy independence and increase consurner choice, while understanding that program targets need to reflect market realities. Because it is imperative RFS regulations be guided by sound science and transparent analysis, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was given statutory authority to adjust RVOs or waive RFS requirements if biofuels production would be less than the minimum volume established by statute or severely harm the economy. To facilitate further advances, federal policy should complement innovation, and recognize the important role renewable sources play in helping to meet our nation's energy needs. This means ensuring regulations are based on sound science and encouraging the deployment of infrastructure needed to get innovative fuels to the marketplace. Only then will consumers and a competitive market be the driving force behind economic success. When reviewing comments on the proposed levels, as well as testimony which officials will hear over coming months, we hope the EPA recognizes producers are the principal stewards of our natural resources and modern on-farm and manufacturing practices are allowing for rnore food, fiber, and fuel production using fewer resources. For instance, over the last thirty years, corn producers have decreased per bushel land use by thirty percent, soil erosion by sixty-seven percent, irrigation use by fifty-three percent, and overall energy use by forty-three percent. Knowing the forward-thinking nature of and ongoing innovation in agriculture, we are confident the industry can achieve levels the world demands. We welcome continued opportunities to work with you to continue diversifying our energy portfolio, ultimately helping our nation achieve energy independence. As the EPA reviews comments submitted on the

PRINTED ON REGYOLEQ PAPERproposed changes, we trust the analysis of sound science will be a prevailing determinant of policy outcomes. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely,

s ADRIAN SWIITH Member of Congress

O ENBERR Member of Congress TERRY Member of Congress
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-0811-CR

EX PARTE JESSICA NICOLE MAUCK, Appellant

Appeal from the 174th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1342193-A).

TO THE 174TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 27th day of August 2015, the case upon appeal to revise 

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final order signed by 

the trial court on September 4, 2014. After submitting the 

case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s 

order contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court 

affirms the trial court’s order.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered August 27, 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Jennings.
WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

November 6, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Order entered August 31, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00536-CV

IN RE PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC., RELATOR

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-05255

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we CONDITIONALLY GRANT 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, in part. We ORDER the trial court to vacate 

the portion of its April 29, 2020 Order compelling relator to produce documents 

responsive to Request for Production numbers 1, 21, 22, and 23 and to respond to 

Interrogatory numbers 1 and 8. We further ORDER the trial court to file with this 

Court, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order, a certified copy of its order 

issued in compliance with this order. Should the trial judgment fail to comply with 

the order, the writ will issue. 

We lift the stay issued by this Court on May 14, 2020.
/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2009 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2009

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from enforcing the Patient 
 Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education 
                      Reconciliation Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep the IRS Off Your Health Care 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) On May 10, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service admitted 
        that it singled out advocacy groups, based on ideology, seeking 
        tax-exempt status.
            (2) This action raises pertinent questions about the 
        agency's ability to implement and oversee Public Law 111-148 
        and Public Law 111-152.
            (3) This action could be an indication of future Internal 
        Revenue Service abuses in relation to Public Law 111-148 and 
        Public Law 111-152 given that it is their responsibility to 
        enforce a key provision, the individual mandate.
            (4) Americans accept the principle that patients, families, 
        and doctors should be making medical decisions, not the Federal 
        Government.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITING ENFORCEMENT OF PPACA AND HCERA.

    The Secretary of the Treasury, or any delegate of the Secretary, 
shall not implement or enforce any provisions of or amendments made by 
Public Law 111-148 or 111-152.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2009

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from enforcing the Patient 
 Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education 
                      Reconciliation Act of 2010.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|   | By:                                   | /s/  Arthur F. Helf |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   | Arthur  F. Helf                       |
|   | Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |                |
|   | Dated:  November 14, 2007             |

 

----
§ 1778.34 Grant servicing. ( a ) Grants will be serviced in accordance with § 1951.215 of subpart E of part 1951 of this title and subpart O of part 1951 of this title.
( b ) The grantee will provide an audit report in accordance with § 1780.47 of part 1780 of this chapter.
Appeal No. 79-119.

#### Raymond A. Turcotte *v.*Paul J. Bento *et al.*

*Paul M. Chappell,*for plaintiff. *Corcoran, Peckham é- Hayes, Patrick O’N. Hayes, Jr., Kathleen Managhan,*for defendants.

The plaintiff appeared before us on November 7, 1979 in response to our order to show why defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure of plaintiff to file his brief should not be granted and, further to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed in light of this court’s ruling that there is no appeal from a Superior Court judgment rendered pursuant to the provisions of §45-20-1.1. *Kurbiec*v. *Bastien,*120 R.I. 111, 385 A.2d 667 (1978).

The plaintiff conceded that the appeal be dismissed. Accordingly plaintiffs appeal is hereby dismissed.
#### § 1735.100 Use of loan funds.

An acquisition of toll line facilities financed with loan funds must be necessary and incidental, as determined by the Administrator, to furnishing or improving telephone service in rural areas. The borrower shall submit to RUS the acquisition agreement, the original cost less depreciation of the facilities, any concurrences with the connecting companies involved, and a detailed inventory of the facilities to be purchased. The borrower must submit to RUS evidence, satisfactory to the Administrator, of the borrower's ownership of the toll line facilities before loan funds for improvement of those facilities will be advanced.

[54 FR 14626, Apr. 12, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39395, Sept. 27, 1990]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, as Principal Executive Officer and as Principal Financial Officer of Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. (the Company),
respectively, certify that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2010, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated therein. The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be relied upon
for any other purpose.



/s/ Paul E. HarringtonPaul E. HarringtonPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)May 18, 2010/s/ Mark A. TrippMark A. TrippChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)May 18, 2010


A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and will be retained by Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
/*     FILE ARCHIVED ON 20:42:01 Jun 15, 2006 AND RETRIEVED FROM THE     INTERNET ARCHIVE ON 14:44:35 Mar 5, 2012.     JAVASCRIPT APPENDED BY WAYBACK MACHINE, COPYRIGHT INTERNET ARCHIVE.     ALL OTHER CONTENT MAY ALSO BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT (17 U.S.C.     SECTION 108(a)(3)).*//*   Stylesheet for buyusa.gov featuring 25th anniversary logo   $Id: buyusa2005.css 288 2005-05-25 11:55:42Z cmil $*/@import "http://web.archive.org/web/20060615204201/http://www.buyusa.gov/style/include/base.css";@import "http://web.archive.org/web/20060615204201/http://www.buyusa.gov/style/include/layout.css";@import "http://web.archive.org/web/20060615204201/http://www.buyusa.gov/style/include/ui.css";@import "http://web.archive.org/web/20060615204201/http://www.buyusa.gov/style/include/forms.css";@import "http://web.archive.org/web/20060615204201/http://www.buyusa.gov/style/include/contents.css";@import "http://web.archive.org/web/20060615204201/http://www.buyusa.gov/style/include/site_buyusa2005.css";
Editorial Note on Part 1956
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1956.138 Processing. ( a ) *Approval.* When a debt settlement application is approved, the State Director will: ( 1 ) Send the original approved Form RD 1956-1 to the Finance Office.
( 2 ) Notify debtors in writing of settlement approval, including the specific amount and terms of the offer that were accepted, for compromise and adjustment offers under § 1956.124 and cancellations with application under § 1956.130(a) of this subpart.
( 3 ) Not be required to notify debtors of settlement approval when debts are cancelled without application under § 1956.130(b) or charged off under § 1956.136 of this subpart.
( b ) *Requesting additional information.* When rejection appears to be necessary either because of lack of information or because the amount of a compromise or adjustment offer is inadequate, the State Director may request the servicing official to obtain the additional information or make an effort to obtain a more acceptable offer, as the circumstances justify. Notice of rejection of an offer will be withheld in such cases until sufficient time has elapsed to enable the debtor to present further information or a new offer.
( c ) *Rejection.* When a debt settlement application is rejected, the State Director will: ( 1 ) Insert the reasons for rejection on the Form FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 1956-1.
( 2 ) Retain the original Form RD 1956-1 in the State Office and return case files and copies of Form RD 1956-1 to the servicing official.
( 3 ) Request the Finance Office to return any adjustment or compromise payment held by the Finance Office to the borrower, in care of the servicing official.
( 4 ) Return any adjustment or compromise payment held by the State Office to the borrower, in care of the servicing official.
( 5 ) Notify the debtor in writing of the reasons for the rejection for compromise and adjustment offers under § 1956.124 and cancellations with application under § 1956.130(a) of this subpart.
( d ) *Appeal rights.* In accordance with subpart B of part 1900 of this chapter, the debtor will be given the right to appeal the rejection of any debt settlement offer made by the debtor under this subpart.
§ 1752.11 Consent to additional, unsecured debt. ( a ) An additional, unsecured loan from another lender to the Borrower may be approved subject to the conditions set forth in this section. In order to request assistance under this section, the Borrower must make a showing that the additional debt will cure any existing or projected delinquency. Additionally, the following requirements must be met, as determined by RUS: ( 1 ) The additional debt will not disadvantage RUS's standing or lien on any of the collateral already pledged to RUS;
( 2 ) The additional debt will not adversely impact the continued financial viability of the Borrower or the Borrower's ability to carry out the purposes of the RUS loan;
( 3 ) The debt is needed to resolve short-term, negative cashflow problems; and
( 4 ) The Borrower is in good standing with the Agency or will become so with the additional debt.
( b ) In the case where all assets of the Borrower are not secured by the Government's debt, the Borrower may request additional debt that is secured by collateral that is not subject to the Government's security interest.
EXHIBIT 31.2                         CERTIFICATION

    I, Joseph M. Harary, President, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and
Chief Accounting Officer of Research Frontiers Incorporated ("RFI"
or the "Registrant") certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of RFI;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's  internal
control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's  most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's  auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's  board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrant's  ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 19, 2004               /s/ Joseph M. Harary
                                      Joseph M. Harary, President, Treasurer
                                      and Chief Accounting Officer
§ 1560.4 Calculation of data to support imposition of temporary duty. The Administrator will inform the Secretary when the following conditions are met with respect to a particular fresh fruit or vegetable imported into the United States from Canada: ( a ) If for each of five consecutive working days the import price of the fresh fruit or vegetable is below ninety percent of the corresponding five-year average monthly import price for such fresh fruit or vegetable excluding the years with the highest and lowest corresponding monthly import price; and
( b ) The planted acreage in the United States for such fresh fruit or vegetable based on the most recent data available is no higher than the average planted acreage over the preceding five years excluding the years with the highest and lowest planted acreages. For the purposes of calculating any planted acreage increase attributed directly to a reduction in wine grape planted acreage existing on October 4, 1987 shall be excluded.