This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains regulatory documents having general

applicability and legal effect, most of which

are keyed to and codified in the Code of

Federal Regulations, which is published under

50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by

the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of

new books are listed in the first FEDERAL

REGISTER issue of each week.

Rules and Regulations Federal Register

24063

Vol. 69, No. 85

Monday, May 3, 2004

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2003–NM–47–AD; Amendment 

39–13566; AD 2004–07–22] 

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing 

Model 747 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This document corrects a 

typographical error that appeared in 

airworthiness directive (AD) 2004–07–

22 that was published in the Federal 

Register on April 7, 2004 (69 FR 18250). 

The typographical error resulted in 

reference to an incorrect paragraph 

number. This AD is applicable to all 

Boeing Model 747 series airplanes. This 

AD requires that the FAA-approved 

maintenance inspection program be 

revised to include inspections that will 

give no less than the required damage 

tolerance rating for each structural 

significant item, and repair of cracked 

structure.

DATES: Effective May 12, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tamara L. Anderson, Aerospace 

Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, 

FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98055–4056; telephone 

(425) 917–6421; fax (425) 917–6590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2004–07–

22, amendment 39–13566, applicable to 

all Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, 

was published in the Federal Register

on April 7, 2004 (69 FR 18250). That AD 

requires that the FAA-approved 

maintenance inspection program be 

revised to include inspections that will 

give no less than the required damage 

tolerance rating for each structural 

significant item, and repair of cracked 

structure. 

As published, Note 1 of the AD has 

a typographical error in the paragraph 

reference of the sentence ‘‘requesting 

approval for an alternative method of 

compliance per paragraph (h)(1) of this 

AD.’’ The correct reference is paragraph 

(g)(1) of this AD. 

Since no other part of the regulatory 

information has been changed, the final 

rule is not being republished in the 

Federal Register. 

The effective date of this AD remains 

May 12, 2004.

§ 39.13 [Corrected]

■ On page 18254, in the first column, 

Note 1 of AD 2004–07–22 is corrected to 

read as follows:

* * * * *

Note 1: * * * For airplanes that have been 

modified, altered, or repaired so that the 

performance of the requirements of this AD 

is affected, the owner/operator must request 

approval for an alternative method of 

compliance per paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. 

***

* * * * *

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 21, 

2004. 

Kalene C. Yanamura, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 04–9899 Filed 4–30–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA–2004–17148; Airspace 

Docket No. 04–ACE–14] 

Modification of Class E Airspace; 

Festus, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: This document confirms the 

effective date of the direct final rule 

which revises Class E airspace at Festus, 

MO.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, June 

10, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 

Airspace Branch, ACE–520A, DOT 

Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 

Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, 

Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 

(816) 329–2524.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

published this direct final rule with a 

request for comments in the Federal 

Register on March 8, 2004 (69 FR 

10606). The FAA uses the direct final 

rulemaking procedure for a noncontroversial rule where the FAA 

believes that there will be no adverse 

public comment. This direct final rule 

advised the public that no adverse 

comments were anticipated, and that 

unless a written adverse comment, or a 

written notice of intent to submit such 

an adverse comment, were received 

within the comment period, the 

regulation would become effective on 

June 10, 2004. No adverse comments 

were received, and thus this notice 

confirms that this direct final rule will 

become effective on that date.

Issued in Kansas City, MO, on April 19, 

2004. 

Elizabeth S. Wallis, 

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central 

Region.

[FR Doc. 04–9920 Filed 4–30–04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA–2004–17149; Airspace 

Docket No. 04–ACE–15] 

Modification of Class E Airspace; 

Fulton, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of 

effective date. 

SUMMARY: This document confirms the 

effective date of the direct final rule 

which revises Class E airspace at Fulton, 

MO.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, June 10, 

2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brenda Mumper, Air Traffic Division, 

Airspace Branch, ACE–520A, DOT 

Regional Headquarters Building, Federal