alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2I, Gregory W. Starks, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Blue Dolphin Energy Company (the“Registrant”). 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiods covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to Securities Exchange Commission Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors:  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2007   /s/ Gregory W. Starks Gregory W. Starks  Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 12.2  CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  I, Paul DAlton, certify that:  (1)I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 20-F of Waterford Wedgwood plc and Waterford Wedgwood UK plc;  (2)Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  (3)Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the companies as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;  (4)The companies other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
companies and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrants, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the
companies disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure control and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and  (c)Disclosed in this report any change in
the companies internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the companies internal control over
financial reporting;  (5)The companies other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the companies auditors and the audit committee of
the companies boards of directors:  (a)All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which could adversely affect the companies ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companies internal control over financial reporting.   Date:
  September 30, 2004Signature:
  /s/ PAUL
  M. DALTONTitle:
  Chief Financial Officer
§ 1778.1 General. ( a ) This part outlines policies and procedures for making Emergency Community Water Assistance Grants (ECWAG) authorized under Section 306A of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, (7 U.S.C. 1926(a)), as amended. Any processing or servicing activity conducted pursuant to this part involving authorized assistance to Agency employees, members of their families, known close relatives, or business or close personal associates, is subject to the provisions of subpart D of part 1900 of this title. Applicants for this assistance are required to identify any known relationship or association with an Agency employee.
( b ) Agency officials will maintain liaison with officials of other Federal, State, regional and local development agencies to coordinate related programs to achieve rural development objectives.
( c ) Agency officials shall cooperate with appropriate State agencies in making grants that support State strategies for rural area development.
( d ) Funds allocated for use in accordance with this part are also to be considered for use by Indian tribes within the State regardless of whether State development strategies include Indian reservations within the State's boundaries. Indians residing on such reservations must have an equal opportunity along with other rural residents to participate in the benefits of this program. This includes equal application of outreach activities of Field Offices.
( e ) Federal statutes provide for extending the Agency financial programs without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, marital status, age, or physical/mental handicap (provided the participant possesses the capacity to enter into legal contracts).
#### § 15.140 Service of decisions.

All final decisions shall be promptly served on all parties and the complainant.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApplication of a self-adaptive grid method to complex flowsA directional-split, modular, user-friendly grid point distribution code is applied to several test problems. The code is self-adaptive in the sense that grid point spacing is determined by user-specified constants denoting maximum and minimum grid spacings and constants relating the relative influence of smoothness and orthogonality. Estimates of truncation error, in terms of flow-field gradients and/or geometric features, are used to determine the point distribution. Points are redistributed along grid lines in a specified direction in an elliptic manner over a user-specified subdomain, while orthogonality and smoothness are controlled in a parabolic (marching) manner in the remaining directions. Multidirectional adaption is achieved by sequential application of the method in each coordinate direction. The flow-field solution is redistributed onto the newly distributed grid points after each unidirectional adaption by a simple one-dimensional interpolation scheme. For time-accurate schemes such interpolation is not necessary and time-dependent metrics are carried in the fluid dynamic equations to account for grid movement.Document ID19900004008Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDeiwert, G. S.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Venkatapathy, E.*(Eloret Corp. Sunnyvale, CA., United States)*Davies, C.*(Sterling Software Palo Alto, CA., United States)*Djomehri, J.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Abrahamson, K.*(Boeing Military Airplane Development Wichita, KS., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1989Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberA-89172NASA-TM-102223NAS 1.15:102223Accession Number90N13324Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-40-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004008.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Daniel Grosso, Respondent, v. Marjorie Senf, Appellant.

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order sought to be reviewed is not an appealable order. (Cf. CPLR 5703, subd. [b].) (Appeal from order of Erie County Court, affirming an order of Buffalo City Court, granting plaintiff’s motion to vacate an order of preclusion.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.
#### § 15.122 Offer of proof.

An offer of proof made in connection with an objection taken to any ruling of the hearing officer rejecting or excluding proposed oral testimony shall consist of a statement for the record of the substance of the evidence which counsel contends would be adduced by such testimony; and, if the excluded evidence consists of evidence in documentary or written form or of reference to documents or records, a copy of such evidence shall be marked for identification and shall accompany the record as an offer of proof.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER**I, Steven Westberg, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of 180 Connect Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: November 14, 2007                                      /s/ Steven Westberg   Steven Westberg   Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
#### § 1599.20 Paperwork Reduction Act.

The information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, and have been assigned OMB control number 0551-0035. A person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7830
EUGENE JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, and CHUCK FALCONE, Plaintiff, versus GEORGE TRENT, Warden, Mt. Olive CorrectionalComplex; NICHOLAS HUN, Commissioner of Division of Corrections; TEREAS WAID, Associate Warden of Treatment; TONY LEMASTERS, Chief of Security; TEREAS AMICK, Correctional Officer I; MIKE OHM, Jobs Coordinator, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-97-430-5) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Eugene Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Leslie K. Kiser, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order declining to reconsider the dismissal of one of Appellant's two constitutional claims in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). We dismiss theappeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Report of China Runji Cement Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xiangfei Zeng, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:








1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.







/s/Xiangfei
Zeng


Xiangfei
Zeng


Chief
Financial Officer





January
14, 2009
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. (the “Registrant”) for the period ended March 31,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,I, Lynn A. Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | May 8, 2008              |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                          |
|   |                          |
| By:    | /s/ Lynn A. Peterson     |   |
|   |                          |   |
|   | Lynn A Peterson               |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|   |                          |   |
|   | (principal executive officer) |   |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)            The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|        | By:                                   | /s/ Arthur F. Helf |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|   | Arthur F. Helf                        |
|   | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   | Dated: November 13,  2006             |

 

----
#### §§ 1780.96-1780.100 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Datawatch Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alan R. MacDougall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuanT to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Alan R. MacDougall
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Alan R. MacDougall
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     December 24, 2002
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1469.9 Technical assistance. ( a ) NRCS may use the services of NRCS-approved or certified Technical Service Providers in performing its responsibilities for technical assistance.
( b ) Technical assistance may include, but is not limited to: Assisting applicants during sign-up, processing and assessing applications, assisting the participant in developing the conservation stewardship plan; conservation practice survey, layout, design, installation, and certification; information, education, and training for producers; and quality assurance activities.
( c ) NRCS retains approval authority over the certification of technical assistance done by non-NRCS personnel.
( d ) NRCS retains approval authority of the conservation stewardship contracts and contract payments.
( e ) Conservation stewardship plans will be developed by NRCS certified conservation planners.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Norman Jones, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on April 5, 1979, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Lupiano, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
Appeal No. 79-269.

#### Smithfield Peat Co., Inc. *v.*Scott-Lee Construction Co., Inc. *et al.*

This case came before us on March 6, 1980 on defendants’ motion under Rule 16(g) to affirm the judgment below vacating a lis pen-dens which plaintiff had placed upon land owned by certain *923of the defendants.

Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.

*Oster, Groff 6- Prescott, George M. Prescott,*for plaintiff, *Letts, Quinn ó- Licht, Robert N. Huseby, Sr.*(for Citizens Savings Bank), *Abedon, Michaelson, Stanzler, Biener, Skolnik ér Lipsey, Carol E. Najarían*(for Ralph Camuso and Marion Camuso), for defendants.

After hearing arguments of counsel and considering plaintiffs brief, we are of the opinion that the Superior Court justice correctly determined that the nature of plaintiff s action here did not justify the filing of a lis pendens. Therefore, the motion to affirm the judgment below is hereby granted.