alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1626 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit the Securities 

and Exchange Commission from issuing rules requiring the disclosure 

of an issuer’s expenditures for political activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2013 

Mrs. WAGNER (for herself and Mr. GARRETT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit 

the Securities and Exchange Commission from issuing 

rules requiring the disclosure of an issuer’s expenditures 

for political activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Focusing the SEC on 

5 Its Mission Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1626 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING DISCLOSURE OF PO2 LITICAL EXPENDITURES. 

3 Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

4 (78m) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(s) PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING DISCLOSURE OF

6 POLITICAL EXPENDITURES.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Commission shall not 

8 require the disclosure by an issuer of any political 

9 expenditure. 

10 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—The term ‘political expendi11 ture’ means— 

12 ‘‘(A) an independent expenditure, as such 

13 term is defined in section 301(17) of the Fed14 eral Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 

15 431(17)); 

16 ‘‘(B) an electioneering communication, as 

17 such term is defined in section 304(f)(3) of 

18 such Act (2 U.S.C. 434(f)(3)) and any other 

19 public communication (as such term is defined 

20 in section 301(22) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 

21 431(22))) that would be an electioneering com22 munication if it were a broadcast, cable, or sat23 ellite communication; or 

24 ‘‘(C) dues or other payments to trade asso25 ciations or organizations described in section 

26 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1626 IH

1 and exempt from tax under section 501(a) of 

2 such Code that are, or could reasonably be an3 ticipated to be, used or transferred to another 

4 association or organization for the purposes de5 scribed in clauses (i) or (ii).’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     The following is a list of the subsidiaries of the Company:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        PLACE OF
           SUBSIDIARY                                INCORPORATION
  <S>                                               <C>
     1)    Candela Iberica, S.A.                     Spain

     2)    Candela France SARL                       France

     3)    Candela KK                                Japan

     4)    Candela Laser (Deutschland) GmbH          Germany

     5)    Candela Skin Care Centers, Inc.           Massachusetts
</TABLE>





                                       2
#### Anna D. KOEPGE, Appellant, v. Carl V. KROMER and Wilbert G. Schwer, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Walter H. Reiger, Deceased, Appellees.

No. 11862.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 1953.

Ritter, Boesel & Lord, Toledo, Ohio, for appellant.

Schwer *&*Moore, Murray & Murray, Sandusky, Ohio, for appellees.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case was heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and the arguments of counsel in open court, and upon due consideration it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and is hereby affirmed upon the opinion and the findings of fact and con-elusions of law of the district court, 118 F.Supp. 571, with the exception of the findings and conclusions with respect to the answer to the seventh question submitted to the court by appellees in their petition for a declaratory judgment, which answer was unnecessary for the court to make in entering the judgment appealed from.
Order entered March 6, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01530-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

WARALEE DUARTE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-10019-Q

ORDER

On February 17, 2014, we received the clerk’s record in this appeal. The record does not 

contain a copy of the trial court’s written order granting appellee’s motion to suppress, which is 

the subject of this State’s appeal.

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the trial court to prepare a written order 

memorializing the court’s ruling on appellee’s motion to suppress and to file a supplemental 

record containing the order within TWENTY-ONE DAYS of the date of this order.

The State’s brief is due within SIXTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Lena Levario, Presiding Judge, 204th Judicial District Court; Monica Davis, Court 

Coordinator, 204th Judicial District Court; Cynthia Bailey, Chief Clerk, 204th Judicial District 
Court; Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s 

Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
#### § 1822.262 Objective.

The basic objective of RHS loans is to assist public or private nonprofit organizations interested in providing sites for housing, to acquire and develop land in rural areas. This land will be subdivided into adequate building sites and sold on a nonprofit basis to (a) families eligible for low and moderate income section 502 Rural Housing (RH) loans, including self-help housing; (b) cooperative Rural Cooperative Housing (RCH) applicants and broadly based nonprofit Rural Rental Housing (RRH) applicants; and (c) applicants eligible for Housing and Urban Development (HUD) sections 235 and 236 insured mortgages.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Sports Safety      

# Resource: Sports Safety

This webpage from the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control provides parents with resources and key prevention tips for helping children and youth avoid sports- and recreation-related injuries. **Learn more.**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Inconnection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Life SciencesHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2006 (the“Report”), I, Michael T. Flavin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)                           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 to the extent applicable; and

(2)                           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | Date: August 14, 2006                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ Michael T. Flavin                 |
|   | Michael T. Flavin                     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer               |
|   | Advanced Life Sciences Holdings, Inc. |

 

1

----
#### § 15e.140 Employment.

No qualified individual with handicaps shall, on the basis of handicap, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1614, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 13-382V 

(Not to be published) 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

 * 

KAREN G. SCHMIDT, * 

 * Filed: July 30, 2015 

 Petitioner, * 

 * Decision by Stipulation; Attorney’s 

 v. * Fees & Costs 

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * 

HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Diana L. Stadelnikas Sedar, Maglio Christopher and Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for Petitioner 

Justine Walters, U.S. Dep’t of Washington, DC, for Respondent 

ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS DECISION1

On June 7, 2013, Karen Schmidt filed a petition seeking compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. On January 12, 2015, Petitioner’s counsel moved for a 

decision on the record. On January 28, 2015, Respondent responded, arguing that the case be 

dismissed. I then issued a decision dismissing the case for insufficient proof on March 11, 2015. 

The parties have now filed a stipulation on July 30, 2015, in which they jointly propose 

that Petitioner’s counsel receive a lump sum of $20,469.00, in the form of a check payable to 

Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel. In addition, and in compliance with General Order No. 9, 

Petitioner has represented that she did incur any reimbursable costs in proceeding on this petition. 

 

1

 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my actions in this case, I will post it on the United States 

Court of Federal Claims website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 

Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002) (current version at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2014)). As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the published decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential 

information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction 

“of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is 

privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute 

a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole decision will be available to 

the public. Id. 
I approve the requested amount for attorney’s fees and costs as reasonable. Accordingly, 

an award should be made in the form of a check in the amount of $20,469.00 payable jointly to 

Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Diana L. Stadelnikas Sedar, Esq. In the absence of a motion 

for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER 

JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.2

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Brian H. Corcoran

 Brian H. Corcoran 

 Special Master 

 

2

 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing their

right to seek review.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I, Bertrand F. Cambou, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spansion Inc. (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c)
disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The
Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.



|                  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/ BERTRAND F. CAMBOU               
|                  |  |  |  | Bertrand F. Cambou                   
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



53
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1827 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1827

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend through fiscal year 
2018 the authorization for certain health care workforce loan repayment 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2013

Mr. Courtney (for himself, Mr. Tonko, and Mr. McDermott) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend through fiscal year 
2018 the authorization for certain health care workforce loan repayment 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pediatric Subspecialty and Mental 
Health Workforce Reauthorization Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN HEALTH CARE WORKFORCE LOAN REPAYMENT 
              PROGRAMS THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2018.

    Section 775(e) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295f(e)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2014'' and inserting ``2018''; and
            (2) by striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2018''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1435.308 New entrants. ( a ) The Secretary may assign a new entrant sugarcane processor an allocation that provides a fair, efficient, and equitable distribution of allocations: ( 1 ) Applicants must demonstrate their ability to process, produce, and market sugar for the applicable crop year,
( 2 ) CCC will consider any adverse effects of the allocation upon existing processors and producers,
( 3 ) CCC will conduct a hearing on a new entrant application if an interested processor or grower requests a hearing,
( 4 ) A new entrant's allocation is limited to no more than 50,000 short tons, raw value, for the first crop year, and
( 5 ) A new entrant will be provided, as determined by CCC: ( i ) A share of its State's cane allotment if the processor is located in Hawaii, Florida, Louisiana, or Texas or
( ii ) A share of the overall mainland cane allotment if the processor is located in any mainland State not listed in paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section.
( b ) For proportionate share States, CCC will establish proportionate shares for the sugarcane required to fill the allocation.
( c ) If a new entrant beet processor constructs a new facility or reopens a facility that currently has no allocation, but last produced beet sugar from sugar beets and sugar beet molasses prior to the 1998 crop year, CCC will: ( 1 ) Assign an allocation to the new entrant to enable it to achieve a facility utilization rate comparable to other similarly-situated sugar beet processors and
( 2 ) Reduce all other beet processor allocations by a like amount on a pro rata basis.
( d ) If a new entrant acquires an existing facility with production history that processed sugar beets for the 1998 or subsequent crop year, CCC will: ( 1 ) Assign the allocation to the buyer to reflect the historical contribution of the sold facilities, unless the buyer and seller have agreed upon a different allocation amount, or
( 2 ) If the new entrant and the processor holding the allocation of the existing facility cannot agree on an allocation amount, the new entrant will be denied a beet sugar allocation.
[74 FR 15366, Apr. 6, 2009]
§ 1773.6 Auditor communication. ( a ) Under GAGAS and AICPA professional auditing standards, the auditor should agree upon the terms of the engagement with management or those charged with governance, as appropriate. The agreed-upon terms of the engagement should be documented in an audit engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement. RUS requires the auditor's communication to take the form of an audit engagement letter prepared by the auditor and that it be formally accepted by the auditee's governance board or an audit committee representing the governance board. In addition to the requirements of the AICPA's professional auditing standards and GAGAS, the engagement letter must also include the following: ( 1 ) The nature of planned work and level of assurance to be provided related to internal control over financial reporting and compliance with laws, regulation, and provision of contracts or grant agreements;
( 2 ) That the auditee and auditor acknowledge that the audit is being performed and that the reporting package is being issued to enable the auditee to comply with the provisions of RUS's security instrument which requires compliance with this part;
( 3 ) That the auditor acknowledges the mandatory reporting requirements for fraud, illegal acts, or noncompliance with provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements in § 1773.9. Acceptance of the engagement letter by the auditee is required, thus granting the auditor permission to directly notify the appropriate officials which may include but is not limited to the governance board, RUS, and OIG;
( 4 ) That the auditor acknowledges that it is required under § 1773.7 to contact RUS if the auditor is unable to resolve scope limitations imposed by the auditee, or if such limitations in scope violate this part. Acceptance of the engagement letter by the auditee is required, thus granting the auditor permission to directly notify RUS as needed;
( 5 ) That the auditee and auditor acknowledge that RUS will consider the auditee to be in violation of its RUS Security Agreement and this part if the auditee fails to have an audit performed and documented in compliance with GAGAS and this part;
( 6 ) That the auditor represents that it meets the requirements under this part to perform the audit;
( 7 ) That the auditor will perform the audit and will issue the required reports and the auditee will prepare and submit the reporting package in accordance with the requirements of this part;
( 8 ) That the auditor will document the audit work performed in accordance with GAGAS, and the requirements of this part; and
( 9 ) That the auditor will make all audit documentation available to RUS or its representatives (including but not limited to OIG and GAO), upon request, and will permit the photocopying or imaging of all such audit documentation.
( b ) A copy of the audit engagement letter must be retained by both the auditee and auditor. The engagement letter must be available at the auditee's office for inspection by RUS personnel or its designated representatives.
[83 FR 19907, May 7, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 7564, Feb. 6, 2023]
§ 1.646 What sanctions may the ALJ impose for failure to comply with discovery? ( a ) Upon motion of a party, the ALJ may impose sanctions under paragraph (b) of this section if any party: ( 1 ) Fails to comply with an order approving discovery; or
( 2 ) Fails to supplement or amend a response to discovery under § 1.642(a).
( b ) The ALJ may impose one or more of the following sanctions: ( 1 ) Infer that the information, testimony, document, or other evidence withheld would have been adverse to the party;
( 2 ) Order that, for the purposes of the hearing, designated facts are established;
( 3 ) Order that the party not introduce into evidence, or otherwise rely on to support its case, any information, testimony, document, or other evidence: ( i ) That the party improperly withheld; or
( ii ) That the party obtained from another party in discovery;
( 4 ) Allow another party to use secondary evidence to show what the information, testimony, document, or other evidence withheld would have shown; or
( 5 ) Take other appropriate action to remedy the party's failure to comply.
#### § 1717.610 RUS approval of compensation of the board of directors.

If a borrower's mortgage or loan contract requires the borrower to obtain approval from RUS for compensation provided to members of the borrower's board of directors, such requirement is hereby waived.