alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1465.21 Contract requirements. ( a ) In order for a participant to receive payments, the participant will enter into a contract agreeing to implement one or more eligible conservation practices. Costs for technical services may be included in the contract.
( b ) An AMA contract will: ( 1 ) Encompass all portions of an agricultural operation receiving AMA assistance;
( 2 ) Be for a duration of not more than 10 years;
( 3 ) Incorporate all provisions required by law or statute, including participant requirements to: ( i ) Not conduct any practices on the agricultural operation that would tend to defeat the purposes of the contract according to § 1465.25;
( ii ) Refund any AMA payments received with interest, and forfeit any future payments under AMA, on the violation of a term or condition of the contract, consistent with the provisions of § 1465.25;
( iii ) Refund all AMA payments received on the transfer of the right and interest of the producer in land subject to the contract, unless the transferee of the right and interest agrees to assume all obligations, including operation and maintenance of the AMA contract's conservation practices, consistent with the provisions of § 1465.24; and
( iv ) Supply information as required by NRCS to determine compliance with the contract and requirements of AMA.
( 4 ) Specify the participant's requirements for operation and maintenance of the applied conservation practices consistent with the provisions of § 1465.22; and
( 5 ) Specify any other provision determined necessary or appropriate by NRCS.
( c ) The participant must apply the practice(s) according to the schedule set out in the APO.
[74 FR 64595, Dec. 8, 2009, as amended at 79 FR 44641, Aug. 1, 2014]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8120 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus HARRY LEON SMITH, III, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

-------------------------- (Opinion December 5, 1996 , 11th Cir., 1996, F.2d ) (April 24, 1997) Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.*
B Y T H E C O U R T : A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

____________________ *Senior U. S. Circuit Judge James C. Hill may participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).
#### § 1775.2 Definitions.

The following definitions apply to subparts A through D of this part.

*Association.* An entity, including a small city or town, that is eligible for RUS Water and Waste Disposal financial assistance in accordance with 7 CFR 1780.7 (a).

*Approval official.* Any individual with administrative and legal responsibility for Rural Development programs.

*Grant agreement.* RUS Guide 1775-1. The agreement outlines the terms and conditions of the grant awards and establishes the guidelines for administering the grant awards.

*Grantee.* The entity or organization receiving financial assistance directly from the RUS to carry out the project or program under these programs.

*Low Income.* Median household income (MHI) below 100 percent of the statewide non-metropolitan median household income (SNMHI).

*Regional.* A multi-State area or any multi-jurisdictional area within a State.

*Rural area.* Any area not in a city or town with a population in excess of 10,000, according to the most recent decennial Census of the United States, and which excludes certain populations pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 1991(a)(13)(H) and (I). If the applicable population figure cannot be obtained from the most recent decennial Census, RD will determine the applicable population figure based on available population data.

*RUS.* The Rural Utilities Service, an Agency of the United States Department of Agriculture.

*Solid Waste Management.* Refers to the operations, maintenance and the recycling of materials disposed of in landfills.

*State.* Any of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Territory of Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of Palau, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

*Technical Assistance.* Supervision, oversight, or training by an organization for the practical solution of a problem or need of an association as defined in this section.

[70 FR 70878, Jan. 7, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 9862, Feb. 24, 2015; 87 FR 38643, June 29, 2022; 89 FR 34958, May 1, 2024]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# ACTION:

Notification of Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee November 19, 2010 Public Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to United States Code, Title 31, section 5135(b)(8)(C), the United States Mint announces the Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee (CCAC) public meeting scheduled for November 19, 2010.

*Date:*                         November 19, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Location:*                         8th Floor Board Room, United States Mint, 801 9th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220.                    

*Subject:*                         Review and discuss reverse candidate designs for the 2011 American Eagle Platinum Coin program, reverse candidate designs for the 2011 First Spouse Coins and Medals honoring Eliza Johnson and Lucy Hayes, and the proposed theme for the 2012 Native American $1 Coin Reverse.                              ( print page 70364)    

*Interested persons should call 202-354-7502 for the latest update on meeting time and room location.*

In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 5135, the CCAC:

■ Advises the Secretary of the Treasury on any theme or design proposals relating to circulating coinage, bullion coinage, Congressional Gold Medals, and national and other medals.

■ Advises the Secretary of the Treasury with regard to the events, persons, or places to be commemorated by the issuance of commemorative coins in each of the five calendar years succeeding the year in which a commemorative coin designation is made.

■ Makes recommendations with respect to the mintage level for any commemorative coin recommended.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cliff Northup, United States Mint Liaison to the CCAC; 801 9th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7200.

Any member of the public interested in submitting matters for the CCAC's consideration is invited to submit them by fax to the following number: 202-756-6830.

Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5135(b)(8)(C).

Dated: November 10, 2010.

Edmund C. Moy,

Director, United States Mint.

[FR Doc. 2010-28862 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 23.1

                          Consent of Grant Thornton LLP

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated December 13, 1999, accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements and have  incorporated  herein by reference or included in
the Annual  Report of  Microlog  Corporation,  on Form 10-K,  for the year ended
October 31, 1999. We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference of said
reports in the Registration  Statement of Microlog  Corporation on Form S-8 (No.
333-84375  dated August 3, 1999,  333-69025  dated December 16, 1998,  333-07981
dated July 11,  1996,  333-34094  dated  March 30,  1990,  and  333-30956  dated
September 11, 1989).

GRANT THORNTON LLP

Vienna, Virginia
January 31, 2000
#### § 1786.37 Application of regulation to previous prepayments.

Nothing contained in this subpart shall affect the validity of prepayments made or guarantees issued pursuant to previous regulations. Those borrowers, however, that completed a prepayment pursuant to section 306(A) of the RE Act and closed loans prior to February 27, 1988, may, in their discretion request RUS approval and if required by prior regulations the concurrence of the Secretary of the Treasury, of any amendments necessary to make the terms and conditions of such loans consistent with, or to consolidate such loans with, loans guaranteed under these regulations.
<PAGE>


                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                        INFINITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION
                               DEFERRED SHARE PLAN


         The Infinity Broadcasting Corporation Deferred Share Plan (the "Plan"),
as amended and  restated as of August 16,  1993,  and amended as of November 19,
1993,   is  hereby   further   amended  as  follows  to  reflect  the  Company's
three-for-two  stock split in the form of a stock dividend,  effective as of May
19, 1995:

         Section 3 of the Plan is  amended  so that the first  sentence  thereof
reads in its entirety as follows:

         "Subject to Section 4.4, the maximum number of Class A Deferred  Shares
         which may be granted pursuant to the terms of the Plan shall be 360,962
         and the maximum number of Class B Deferred  Shares which may be granted
         pursuant to the terms of the Plan shall be 1,174,454."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the Company has caused its duly authorized officer
to execute this Amendment as of the 15th day of June, 1995.


                                       INFINITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION


                                       By:_____________________________________
                                              Name:  Farid Suleman
                                              Title:  VP of Finance
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: R.L.C.

- E. A/K/A

R.C.

- E., A MINOR

PETITION OF: J.C., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 83 EM 2018

IN THE INTEREST OF: G.J.C.

- E. A/K/A G.C.E., A MINOR

PETITION OF: J.C., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 84 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of August , 2018, the Application for Leave to F ile Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is directed to file the

already

- prepared Petition for Allowance of A p peal within five days.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1902 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for timely access 

to post-mastectomy items under Medicare. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2013 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself and Ms. MOORE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for timely access to post-mastectomy items under Medicare. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Breast Cancer Recov5 ery Improvement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TIMELY ACCESS TO POST-MASTECTOMY ITEMS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1834(h)(1) of the Social 

8 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1902 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (H) as sub2 paragraph (I); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the fol4 lowing new subparagraph: 

5 ‘‘(H) SPECIAL PAYMENT RULE FOR POST6 MASTECTOMY EXTERNAL BREAST PROSTHESIS

7 GARMENTS.—Payment for post-mastectomy ex8 ternal breast prosthesis garments shall be made 

9 regardless of whether such items are supplied to 

10 the beneficiary prior to or after the mastectomy 

11 procedure or other breast cancer surgical proce12 dure. The Secretary shall develop policies to en13 sure appropriate beneficiary access and utiliza14 tion safeguards for such items supplied to a 

15 beneficiary prior to the mastectomy or other 

16 breast cancer surgical procedure.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 subsection (a) shall take effect as of the date of the enact19 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Roger J. Madigan, as Father of Aprile Madigan, an Infant, et al., Respondents-Appellants, v State of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

(Claim No. 59035.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to claimants, for the reasons stated at the Court of Claims, Lowery, J. (Appeals from judgment of Court of Claims—negligence.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
#### §§ 1737.93-1737.99 [Reserved]
#### § 1755.400 RUS standard for acceptance tests and measurements of telecommunications plant.

Sections 1755.400 through 1755.407 cover the requirements for acceptance tests and measurements on installed copper and fiber optic telecommunications plant and equipment.

[62 FR 23960, May 2, 1997]
The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western *

District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-1430EA

_____________

Frances Birmingham, *

*

Appellant, *

*

Louisiana Cotton Association *

Agricultural Compensation Self- *

Insurance Fund, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

Intervenor, * District of Arkansas.

*

v. * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Union Pacific Railroad Company, a *

Utah Corporation, *

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: November 16, 1998

Filed: November 27, 1998 

_____________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and DAWSON, District *

Judge.

_____________

PER CURIAM.
-2-

Frances Birmingham appeals from an adverse jury verdict in this personal injury

action. Birmingham raises several contentions related to the admissibility of evidence

offered by Union Pacific Railroad Company and the rulings and instructions of the

district court. Because the parties' submissions show they are thoroughly familiar with

the issues before the court, we conclude that an extensive discussion would serve no

useful purpose. Having considered the record, the briefs, and the relevant state law,

we reject Birmingham's contentions of reversible error. We thus affirm the judgment

of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,Dennis J. Simonis, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of M. L. Macadamia Orchards,L.P.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annualreport (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date;

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annualreport whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or inother factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions withregard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
| Date:  March  23, 2005            |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   |
| /s/ Dennis J. Simonis                  |   |   |
|                                   |   |
| Dennis J. Simonis                      |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                        |        |  |

 

1

----
#### Ira Blutreich et al., Respondents, v Amalgamated Dwellings, Inc., Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 530]

*270Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered October 23, 2003, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to hold defendant in contempt insofar as to refer the matter for a hearing on the issue of legal fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The order was clearly a contempt finding against defendant for failure to comply with a prior unconditional court order to issue privatized stock to plaintiffs *(see Blutreich v Amalgamated Dwellings,*298 AD2d 185 [2002], *lv denied*100 NY2d 501 [2003]). Accordingly, legal fees were properly recoverable by plaintiffs pursuant to Judiciary Law § 773 *(see Holskin v 22 Prince St. Assoc.,*178 AD2d 347 [1991]).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Ellerin, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe insertion of human dynamics models in the flight control loops of V/STOL research aircraft. Appendix 2: The optimal control model of a pilot in V/STOL aircraft control loopsAn overview is presented of research work focussed on the design and insertion of classical models of human pilot dynamics within the flight control loops of V/STOL aircraft. The pilots were designed and configured for use in integrated control system research and design. The models of human behavior that were considered are: McRuer-Krendel (a single variable transfer function model); and Optimal Control Model (a multi-variable approach based on optimal control and stochastic estimation theory). These models attempt to predict human control response characteristics when confronted with compensatory tracking and state regulation tasks. An overview, mathematical description, and discussion of predictive limitations of the pilot models is presented. Design strategies and closed loop insertion configurations are introduced and considered for various flight control scenarios. Models of aircraft dynamics (both transfer function and state space based) are developed and discussed for their use in pilot design and application. Pilot design and insertion are illustrated for various flight control objectives. Results of pilot insertion within the control loops of two V/STOL research aricraft (Sikorski Black Hawk UH-60A, McDonnell Douglas Harrier II AV-8B) are presented and compared against actual pilot flight data. Conclusions are reached on the ability of the pilot models to adequately predict human behavior when confronted with similar control objectives.Document ID19900012460Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsZipf, Mark E.*(Pittsburgh Univ. Pittsburgh, PA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186598NASA-CR-186598Accession Number90N21776Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-729Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900012460.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024