alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report of Blue Dolphin
Energy Company (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Ivar Siem, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/Ivar Siem
------------------------------------

Ivar Siem

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

July 5, 2005
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.511 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Myron Steinberg, Appellant, v. Town Board of the Town of Oyster Bay, Respondent.

Motion by appellant for a preference in the hearing of the appeal and for other relief denied. On the court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs. The judgment appealed from is intermediate and no appeal lies as of light from such, judgment (cf. *Matter of Soros*v. *Board of Appeals of Vil. of*Southampton, 24 A D 2d 705, 706). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Babin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
#### § 1780.56 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1872 

CLEVEN LEWIS ROBERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social

Security Administration,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA05-408-JFM)

Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 26, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cleven Lewis Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Cleven Lewis Roberson appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on Roberson’s complaint filed under the Social Security Act.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Roberson v. Barnhart, No. CA-05-408-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 3,

2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.151 Purpose.

This subpart prescribes authorizations, policies, and procedures of theRural Housing Service (RHS), and Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS), herein referred to as “Agency,” for processing final payment on all loans. This subpart does not apply to Direct Single Family Housing customers or to the Rural Rental Housing, Rural Cooperative Housing, or Farm Labor Housing Program of the RHS. This subpart does not apply to Water and Waste Programs of the Rural Utilities Service, Watershed loans, and Resource Conservation and Development loans, which are serviced under part 1782 of this title. In addition, this subpart is inapplicable to Farm Service Agency, Farm Loan Programs.

[72 FR 55018, Sept. 28, 2007, as amended at 72 FR 64123, Nov. 15, 2007]
#### §§ 1709.23-1709.99 [Reserved]
## {)(^'Os>T'mT"Utt

Marc h 5 , 201 0 Mr

. Chuc k

Howell , CE O Mr

. Dou g Voss , Presiden t Grea t Lake s Aviation , Ltd

. B yemail : chowell@flygreatlakes.co m Dea rChuck : d I a m sorryt o fin d mysel fagai n writin g t o yo u unde rthes e circumstances

. Grea t Lakes ' servic e t o Moa b ha s deteriorate d sharpl ythi s winte ri n spit e ofassurance s tha t th e syste m an d schedul e change s yo u wer e makin g woul d resul t i n improve d service

. Durin g Januaryan d Februaryi n additio n t o th e 5 0 flight s cancelle d du e t o weather , 2 7 (17% ) wer e cancelle d du e t o cre wunavailabilit yo r othe rSNAFUs

. Ofth e 8 8 flight s tha t di d operate , 3 2 (36% ) wer e no t o n schedule

. Thi s continue d poo rperformanc e i s encouragin g a cynica l attitud e o n th e par t o ftouris t businesses , count ypolic ymaker s an d th e Airport Boar d i n regar d t o Grea t Lake s Aviation

. W e woul d greatl yappreciat e hearin g fro m yo u concernin g th e circumstance s tha t le d t o thi s poo r performanc e an d wha t step s Grea t Lake s i s takin g t o remediat e it

. W e woul d b e happ yt o schedul e tim e fo ryo u o rDou g t o presen t a t a n airport boar d meeting

. Sincerely ,

Bo b Greenberg , Chai r Gran d Count yAirport Boar d C cDou g Voss , President , Grea t Lake s Aviatio n Kell yBraun , Airport Manage r Audre yGraham , Chair , Gran d Count yCounci l Melind a Brimhall , Gran d Count yCounci l Administrato r Denni s Devany , Chief , EA S Program , USDO T
#### § 1787.8 Purchase of nondomestic products.

An RUS Borrower may only use loan funds to purchase a nondomestic product if a waiver pursuant to § 1787.10 has been received by the Administrator before entering into a contract with the vendor. Should the Administrator deny the waiver request, the RUS Borrower must use its own funds for the expenditure.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Datawatch Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert W. Hagger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuanT to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Robert W. Hagger
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     Robert W. Hagger
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     December 24, 2002
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6409
WILLIAM LEE SWANN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SEWALL SMITH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-98- 387-L) Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 18, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Lee Swann, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Swann v. Smith , No. CA-98-387-L (D. Md. Feb. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer****Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended **March 31, 2006**(the“Report”) of **Patriot Capital Funding, Inc.**(the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, **William E. Alvarez, Jr.,**the Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of myknowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theRegistrant.     /s/ William E. Alvarez, Jr.     Name: William E. Alvarez, Jr.  Date: May 15, 2006
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

29–011 2004

108th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 108–210 

CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC 

OF CHINA OF THE SPECIFIED ITEMS IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO 

THE UNITED STATES SPACE LAUNCH INDUSTRY AND THAT THE 

MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ANY INDIRECT TECHNICAL BENEFIT THAT COULD BE DERIVED FROM SUCH EXPORTS, WILL NOT MEASURABLY IMPROVE THE MISSILE OR 

SPACE LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105–261, SEC. 1512 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2004.—Referred to the Committee on International 

Relations and ordered to be printed 


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 6, 2004. 

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: In accordance with the provisions of section 

1512 of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261), I hereby certify that the 

export to the People’s Republic of China of the following items is 

not detrimental to the United States space launch industry and 

that the material and equipment, including any indirect technical 

benefit that could be derived from such exports, will not measurably improve the missile or space launch capabilities of the People’s 

Republic of China. 

1. One linear accelerator for Huanggang Customs, for inspection 

of cargo entering the Port of Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China. 

2. Fifty-thousand pounds of fine-grained graphite, for Shanghai 

Carbone Lorraine Chemical, located in Shanghai, People’s Republic 

of China, to use in manufacturing temperature-resistant industrial 

machinery components. 

3. One linear accelerator for Harbin Boiler Company, Ltd., located in Harbin, People’s Republic of China, to use in nondestructive testing and inspection of utility boilers and valves for 

conventional power and auxiliary equipment. 

4. One hot isostatic press, for Guizhou Anji Foundry Company, 

located in Anshun City, Guizhou Province, People’s Republic of 

China, to use in consolidation of titanium and aluminum castings 

for chemical equipment parts. 

5. Two environmental test chambers, for Flextronics Industrial 

Company, Ltd., located in Jingan, Doumen Zhuhai, People’s Republic of China, to test Xbox game consoles for the Microsoft Corporation. 

6. One environmental test chamber, for Hon Hai Precision Industries Company, Ltd., located in Guangdong, People’s Republic of 

China, to test personal computers and peripheral equipment for 

Apple, Compaq, and Dell. 

7. One filament winding machine, for Weifang Dongming Extinguisher Equipment, located in Weifang, Shandong, People’s Republic of China, to use in manufacturing 600,000 carbon dioxide fire 

extinguisher bottles per year. 

Sincerely, 

GEORGE W. BUSH. 

Æ
Order entered July 2 4 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 15

- 00779

- CV

CAS, LTD, Appellant

V.

TM AVIATION PARTNERS , LP, TM AVIATION EN TERPRISES, LLC, AND TIMOTHY THOMPSON, Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 004

- 01101

- 2014



### O RDER

We GRANT court reporter Claudia Webb’s July 2 2 , 2015 request for extension of time

to file the record and ORDER the reporter’s record be filed no later than August 4, 2015

.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
#### § 1786.50 Purpose.

This subpart sets forth the policies and procedures of RUS whereby electric and telephone borrowers may prepay outstanding RUS Notes at the Discounted Present Value of the RUS Notes with private financing.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1642 

To protect the eligibility for Federal employment and access to classified 

information for Department of Defense civilian employees who may incur 

financial hardships as a result of furloughs dictated by sequestration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2013 

Mr. KILMER (for himself, Ms. HANABUSA, and Mr. HECK of Washington) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To protect the eligibility for Federal employment and access 

to classified information for Department of Defense civilian employees who may incur financial hardships as a 

result of furloughs dictated by sequestration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Security Clearance 

5 Protection Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1642 IH

1 (1) On March 1, 2013, pursuant to the Budget 

2 Control Act of 2011, across-the-board spending cuts 

3 went into effect, triggering a massive cut in Federal 

4 discretionary spending across each Federal depart5 ment and agency until $1.2 trillion in savings is 

6 achieved. 

7 (2) The impact of the cuts from sequestration 

8 will be significant and will affect many civilian em9 ployees who work for the Federal Government, some 

10 of whom handle classified materials to protect na11 tional security. 

12 (3) To absorb such budget cuts, Federal de13 partment and agencies will furlough many civilian 

14 employees for up to 22 days a year. 

15 (4) Some civilian employees will incur financial 

16 hardships and may not be able to meet their finan17 cial obligations due to loss of pay. 

18 (5) Sequestration and employee furloughs are a 

19 result of circumstances outside of the control of Fed20 eral employees and no fault of their own. 

21 SEC. 3. NO EFFECT ON ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMA22 TION DUE TO SEQUESTRATION. 

23 The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that, if any 

24 financial hardship is incurred by a civilian employee of the 

25 Department of Defense due to a furlough as a result of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1642 IH

1 sequestration under section 251A of the Balanced Budget 

2 and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, that financial 

3 hardship will not affect the employee’s— 

4 (1) eligibility for continued suitability for em5 ployment by the Department; 

6 (2) access to classified information; or 

7 (3) suitability to hold a position critical to na8 tional security. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 1783.12 What are eligible uses of grant proceeds? ( a ) Grant proceeds shall be used solely for the purpose of establishing the revolving loan fund to provide loans to eligible entities for: ( 1 ) Pre-development costs associated with proposed water and wastewater projects or with existing water and wastewater systems, and
( 2 ) Short-term costs incurred for replacement equipment, small-scale extension of services, or other small capital projects that are not part of the regular operations and maintenance activities of existing water and wastewater systems.
( b ) A grant recipient may not use grant funds in any manner inconsistent with the terms of the grant agreement.
#### §§ 1744.22-1744.29 [Reserved]
§ 1540.21 Definition. *Perishable product* means: ( a ) Live plants provided for in subpart A of part 6 of schedule 1 of the 1985 Tariff Schedules of the United States (the “TSUS”);
( b ) Fresh or chilled vegetables provided for in items 135.03 through 138.46 of the TSUS;
( c ) Fresh mushrooms provided for in item 144.10 of the TSUS;
( d ) Fresh fruits provided for in items 146.10, 146.20, 146.30, 146.50 through 146.62, 146.90, 146.91, 147.03 through 147.44, 147.50 through 149.21 and 149.50 of the TSUS;
( e ) Fresh cut flowers provided for in items 192.17, 192.18, and 192.21 of the TSUS; and
( f ) Concentrated citrus fruit juice provided for in items 165.25, 165.29 and 165.36 of the TSUS.
M. P. No. 78-255.

#### Umberto Lisi *et al. v.*Michael Marra.

Mr. Justice Weisberger did not participate.

*W. Slater Allen, Jr.,*for plaintiff, *Richard A. Ciccone, Albert R. Ciullo,*for defendant.

The defendant’s petition for reinstatement of this

appeal is granted. The clerk of the Superior Court is directed to transmit the record in this case to this court forthwith.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Research
Frontiers Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph M. Harary, President, Treasurer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.

/s/ Joseph M. Harary
Joseph M. Harary
President, Treasurer
and Principal Accounting Officer
March 13, 2008
§ 1784.11 Restrictions. Grant funds may *not* be used to: ( a ) Pay any annual recurring costs that are considered to be operational expenses of a facility.
( b ) Pay basic/rental fee or depreciation for the use of the recipient community's equipment.
( c ) Purchase existing systems.
( d ) Pay for items not associated with Rural Utilities Service's approved scope of work. This includes projects developed from other funding sources.
( e ) Except as provided in this part, finance any public or commercial facility.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN
ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                       113
<INVENTORY>                                        933
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,972
<PP&E>                                           8,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,921
<BONDS>                                          3,989
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,845
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,890
<SALES>                                         13,173
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,221
<CGS>                                            8,732
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,517
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,517
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Bennie Jones, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CV1701025.

Vs. No. 11-21-00011-CV * April 8, 2021

Cecil Salazar, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Bennie Jones’s motion to dismiss his appeal and 

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal 

are taxed against Bennie Jones.
§ 1753.82 Minor construction closeout. ( a ) For minor construction inspected by the borrower's engineer, an original and two copies of Form 771 shall be sent to the GFR. The GFR will initial and return the original and one copy.
( b ) When funds are requested for minor construction, the original Form 771 signed or initialed by the GFR, shall be submitted with the FRS. Forms 771 should be submitted only with the FRS which they support. RUS does not encumber funds pursuant to Forms 771 unless an advance is made to the borrower. (See 7 CFR part 1744 subpart C).