alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
      in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






/s/
      Richard
      Rappaport


Richard
      Rappaport


President
      (Principal Executive Officer)






/s/
      Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos


Anthony
      C. Pintsopoulos


Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)





November
      13, 2007




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      SRKP 2, Inc. and will be retained by SRKP 2, Inc. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In re GILROY, Com'r.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

In the matter of the application of Thomas F. Gilroy, commissioner, for the appointment of commissioners of appraisal.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.677 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Cathleen Miller, Respondent, v Garry Loewenberg, as Superintendent of Schools of the Carmel Central School District, et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination discharging petitioner as a school bus driver, the appeal (by permission) is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, dated December 26, 1978 and entered in Putnam County, as denied appellants’ application to dismiss the petition on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to entitle petitioner to the relief sought. Order reversed insofar as appealed from on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion to dismiss is granted. Since petitioner was not entitled to a hearing prior to her discharge, she cannot be heard to complain about defects in the informal hearing granted her as a matter of grace. (See *Matter of Brown v North Syracuse Cent. School Dist.,*55 AD2d 813; *Matter of Greenfield v Moses,*169 Misc 389, affd 257 App Div 809; *People ex rel. Lion v Murray,*5 App Div 288.) The petition, the motion papers, and the accompanying exhibits show that the determination was not arbitrary or capricious. (See *Matter of Talamo v Murphy,*38 NY2d 637.) The claim that petitioner is entitled to a due process hearing because her dismissal was of a stigmatizing nature has not been considered. This allegation had not been previously raised and will not be considered for the first time on appeal (see *Matter of Glazer*v *Hankin,*50 AD2d 924, mot to dismiss app granted 39 NY2d 743). In any event, we note that the generalized determination of the board of education to dismiss petitioner, who could have been terminated at will, was not based on any particularized stigmatic factual determinations. Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the amended quarterly report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated:  August 20, 2007 | s/Gordon Laschinger___________________

Gordon Laschinger, Chief Executive Officer |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 10.12

       Credit Facility Letter dated as of August 11, 2004 between Ardent
                 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bioaccelerate, Inc.


                               BIOACCELERATE INC.

                                712 Fifth Avenue

                            New York, New York 10019

                                                                 August 11, 2004

Ardent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
631 United Drive, Suite 200

Durham, NC  27713

Gentlemen:

      Reference is hereby made to that certain proposed Agreement and Plan of
Merger by and among Enhance Biotech, Inc. ("Enhance"), Enhance Merger Corp. and
Ardent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Ardent") (the "Merger Agreement") whereby Enhance
Merger Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Enhance, will merge with and into
Ardent (the "Merger").

      Bioaccelerate  Inc.  ("Bioaccelerate")  hereby  acknowledges  that  in its
capacity as a stockholder of, and a lender to, Enhance, it will receive a direct
and material  benefit as a result of the Merger.  Therefore,  in order to induce
Ardent  to  execute  the  Merger   Agreement  and  consummate  the  transactions
contemplated thereby, Bioaccelerate hereby covenants and agrees to provide up to
a $2  million  credit  facility  (the  "Facility")  to  Ardent  on the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth. Subject to prior consummation of the Merger in
accordance  with the Merger  Agreement,  the Facility will be available for draw
down in six  installments  of $333,333  starting on January 1st, 2005 and on the
first day of each of the  succeeding  five (5) months  thereafter  in accordance
with the applicable budget referred to in the succeeding paragraph.

      The  terms  and  conditions  of the  Facility  will  mirror  the terms and
conditions of the Facility  provided by  Bioaccelerate  to Enhance on August 11,
2004  (including,  without  limitation,  provisions  for  security  in  Ardent's
business and assets,  the terms and conditions of the secured grid note, and the
terms and  conditions  of a warrant for shares of Enhance) and will require that
Ardent  use such  Facility  for  working  capital  according  to a budget  to be
mutually  agreed upon by the  parties at the time of  initiating  the  Facility.
However,  warrants will not be issued  pursuant to the Facility unless and until
Ardent draws the first installment of financing under the Facility.

                                    Very truly yours,

                                    Bioaccelerate Inc.

                                    By: /s/ Lee Cole
                                        --------------
                                        Name: Lee Cole
                                        Title:   CEO

Accepted and agreed as of the date first appearing above

Ardent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

By: /s/ Kwen-Jen Chang
    ------------------------
    Name: Kwen-Jen Chang
    Title: President and CEO


                                      -1-
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.254 Program costs. ( a ) *Allowable costs.* ( 1 ) Allowable costs for direct provision of supportive services includes the provision of supportive services and others approved by the Secretary concerned for: ( i ) Direct hiring of staff, including a service coordinator;
( ii ) Supportive service contracts with third parties;
( iii ) Equipment and supplies (including food) necessary to provide services;
( iv ) Operational costs of a transportation service (e.g., mileage, insurance, gasoline and maintenance, driver wages, taxi or bus vouchers);
( v ) Purchase or leasing of vehicles;
( vi ) Direct and indirect administrative expenses for administrative costs such as annual fiscal review and audit, telephones, postage, travel, professional education, furniture and equipment, and costs associated with self evaluation or assessment (not to exceed one percent of the total budget for the activities approved); and
( vii ) States, Indian tribes and units of general local government with more than one project included in the grant may receive up to 1% of the total cost of the grant for monitoring the projects.
( 2 ) Allowable costs shall be reasonable, necessary and recognized as expenditures in compliance with OMB Cost Policies, *i.e.*, OMB Circular A-87, 24 CFR 85.36, and OMB Circular A-128.
( b ) *Nonallowable costs.* ( 1 ) CHSP funds may not be used to cover expenses related to any grantee program, service, or activity existing at the time of application to CHSP.
( 2 ) Examples of nonallowable costs under the program are: ( i ) Capital funding (such as purchase of buildings, related facilities or land and certain major kitchen items such as stoves, refrigerators, freezers, dishwashers, trash compactors or sinks);
( ii ) Administrative costs that represent a non-proportional share of costs charged to the Congregate Housing Services Program for rent or lease, utilities, staff time;
( iii ) Cost of supportive services other than those approved by the Secretary concerned;
( iv ) Modernization, renovation or new construction of a building or facility, including kitchens;
( v ) Any costs related to the development of the application and plan of operations before the effective date of CHSP grant award;
( vi ) Emergency medical services and ongoing and regular care from doctors and nurses, including but not limited to administering medication, purchase of medical supplies, equipment and medications, overnight nursing services, and other institutional forms of service, care or support;
( vii ) Occupational therapy and vocational rehabilitation services; or
( viii ) Other items defined as unallowable costs elsewhere in this subpart, in CHSP grant agreement, and OMB Circular A-87 or 122.
( c ) *Administrative cost limitation.* Grantees are subject to the limitation in section 802(j)(4).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Investment Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2011 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 1, 2012



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David Gladstone                                           
|David Gladstone                                               
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

# SUMMARY:

                        The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will be meeting at the time and location listed above. The BBG will be considering resolutions regarding protection of journalists and the Agency's Ethics Program, report from the Board's Governance Committee, a report from the International Broadcasting Bureau Coordinating Committee, and research presentations by InterMedia and Gallup. The meeting is open to the public—but                               ( print page 69398)                            due to space limitations via webcast only—and will be streamed live on the BBG's public Web site at                         *http://www.bbg.gov.*                         The meeting will also be made available on the BBG's public Web site for on-demand viewing.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-28617 Filed 11-9-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
#### John T. Elfvin, Individually as a Citizen, Resident and Taxpayer of the City of Buffalo and as a Member of the Common Council of the City of Buffalo, Appellant, v. City of Buffalo et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

-Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party, with leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Memorandum: In *902affirming, we accept and adopt the determination and declaration of the Special Term Justice that section 411 of the Charter of the City of Buffalo is valid. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Special Term dismissing complaint in an action to enjoin referendum on city sales tax.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Veeehio and Harsh, JJ. (Order entered March 9, 1967.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 1940

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1940 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1940.594-1940.600 [Reserved]
#### §§ 1784.32-1784.34 [Reserved]
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theaccompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 of GlobalPartners LP (the “Partnership”) and filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Hollister, ExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer of Global GP LLC, the generalpartner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.               the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| Dated:   August 14, 2006 |   | By:    |     /s/Thomas J. Hollister |                              |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                          |   |   |                                           | Thomas J. Hollister               |
|                          |   |   |                                           | Executive Vice President and      |
|                          |   |   |                                           | Chief Financial Officer           |
|                          |   |   |                                           | of Global GP LLC, general partner |
|                          |   |   |                                           | of Global Partners LP             |
|                               |        |        |                                                |                                   |  |  |

 

----
Exhibit 10.35
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Agreement th Company Executive
 Recitals
 Business
  Agreement
  ARTICLE I  INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT
 Defined Terms
 Affiliate
 Base Salary
 Board
 Cause
 Change of Control




---



##### 



provided, however,
 Company
 Company Information
 Confidential Information
 Disability
 " Employment Period
 Executive
 Good Reason
 Material Adverse Effect
 Non-Solicitation Period
 Notice of Termination
 2




---



##### 



Person
 Significant Competitor
 Significant Customer
 Subsidiary
 Termination Date
 Trade Secrets
 Welfare Plan Benefits
 Interpretation herein hereof hereunder
 ARTICLE II  EMPLOYMENT
 Duration termination without Cause Employment Period Termination Date Notice of Termination
 Salary and Benefits
 3




---



##### 



Base Salary
  provided, however,
    Services
 Severance Pay
 other than
 4




---



##### 



Severance Period Welfare Plan Benefits provided, however,
 Code
 Incentive Compensation
 Equity Participation provided however
 ARTICLE III  PROPERTY AND BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
 Nondisclosure
 5




---



##### 



Books and Records
 Inventions and Patents
 Other Businesses
 Non-Solicitation of Employees
 Non-Solicitation of Customers Significant
Customer Significant Competitor
 6




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV  MISCELLANEOUS
 Notices
  
  
  
  Severability
 7




---



##### 



Complete Agreement
 Counterparts
 Successors and Assigns
 Equitable Remedies
 Choice of Law
 Dispute Resolution
 8




---



##### 



Amendments and Waivers
 Business Days
 No Third Party Beneficiary
  9




---



##### 



DEI HOLDINGS, INC.By:
    /s/ James E. MinarikJames E. MinarikPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Kevin P. DuffyKevin P. Duffy 10
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ciarin
Griffin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                             /s/ Ciaran Griffin
                             -----------------------------
                             Ciaran Griffin
                             Principal Financial Officer
                             May 23, 2006
#### Elizabeth O’Mara, Appellant, v. James P. Ranalli, Respondent.

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the Memorandum and as modified affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Petitioner petitioned Family Court under article 4 of the Family Court Act, alleging failure on the part of the respondent to comply with the support provisions of a Mexican divorce decree incorporating a separation agreement by reference without merging the same, and asking their enforcement. -On his appearance before the court respondent asked for a hearing and made a cross motion to modify the support provisions on the ground of a change of circumstances. Following a hearing the court made no finding of a change in circumstances, and the ordered reduction of payments from $100 a week to $65 a week plus dental and *697medical care and hospitalization would indicate the court did not consider any substantial change to have been established. In view of the lack of any showing of any change in the respondent’s situation or in the petitioner’s requirements on the children’s behalf, and also in view of the ample resources of the respondent to meet the obligation for support imposed by the decree, no proper basis was established for the modification of the support provisions of the decree. While the appellant challenges the adequacy of the award for attorney’s fees, there is nothing presented in the record which provides a basis for review. The order of Family Court should be modified by directing that the respondent pay to the petitioner, for the children’s support, the sum of $100 a week, such payments to commence as of March 2, 1966 and there to be credited thereon such payments as have been made since that date, and by deleting the provision for payment by the respondent of medical and dental expenses, and hospitalization. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Family Court, directing support of children.) Present—'Williams, P J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RICHARD CLYDE ALTHOUSE,

Appellant,

v.

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-21

[October 13, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; John S. Kastrenakes, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502021CA009746.

Richard Clyde Althouse, Sebring, pro se.

Anthony M. Stella, Assistant City Attorney II, Office of the City Attorney,

City of West Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1425.13 Uniform marketing agreement. ( a ) A CMA must enter into a uniform marketing agreement with each member who delivers a commodity to a loan pool.
( b ) The identification number used by the member to report acreage on applicable farms to FSA must appear on the marketing agreement.