alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY

FEBRUARY 1993

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAl.

SENIOR ASST.

ATTORNEY GENERAl.

JIM PHARRIS

BEV JOLLEY

459-6159

r- --

DIRECTOR

MARY RIVELtoND

TONY MONTOYA

459-6168

DEPUTY DIRECTOR

TERRY HUS8EMAN

DIANNE PASTORE

459-6170

ECOlOGICAl

COMMISSION

CHAIR

_ - 1 FRED SHIOSAKI

NUCLEAR

WASTE ADVISOR

COUNCIL CHAIR

BETTY TABBUn

EDUCAlIONAND

PUBLIC INFORMA nON

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

KIMBERLY CONTRIS

SANDY FAL TER

45lUl839

FINANCIAL, PERSONNEL

& SUPPORT SERVICES

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

JIM MARliN

DIANE CDl..LlNS

438·7447

BUDGET, ACCOUNTING

SUPPORT SERVICES

PROGRAM MANAGER

BILL WHEELER

CHARLENE NELSON

459-617P

LEGISLtoTIVE &

INTERGOVERNMENTAL . RELtoTIONS

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

IllLLALKlRE

BRENOA KANE . 459-6030 "U

Q)

<0

11l

a> CENTRAL PROGRAMS AND ENFORCEMENT

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

D. J. PATIN

KA THIE ROUSH

459-6012

CENTRAL

REGIONAL OFFICE REGIONAL DIRECTOR

PAT SPURGIN

JUDY WESTON

(509) 457·7120

EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE

REGIONAL DIRECTOR

CLAUDE SAPPINGTON

MARIL YN NELSON

(509) 456-6149

QUAliTY CONTROL

INFORMATION MGMT.

COMPo PlANNING Ml$lSTANT DIRECTOR

MIKE REED

JULIE RUSTER

451Hi69O

WATER & SHORElANOS

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

LINDA CRERAR

VACANT

438·7494

PERSONNEL SERVICES

MANAGER

LtoRRY KELLER

JOYCE BEEBE

45lHi218

WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

OANSILVER

JANICE JACKSON

459-6029

AIR PROGRAMS

PROGAAM MANAGER

JOE WILLIAMS

GERRY KliNKEL

459-6255

CENTAALPROGRAMS

PROGRAM MANAGER

GREG SORLIE

PEGGY NOBLE

459-6037

NORTHWEST REGIONAL OFFICE

REGIONAL DIRECTOR

MIKE RUNOLETI

KRIS JESSETT

649-7010

~OUTHWEST

REGIONAL OFFICE REGIONAL DIRECTOR

PAT LEE

SARAH BARRIE

753-2707

SHORE lANDS AND

COASTAL ZONE MGT

PROGRAM MANAGER

ROO MACK

LEILA ANDERSON

459-6777

WATER QUALITY

PAOOAAM MANAGER

MIKE LLEWELYN

LOUISE TABOR-KRAMER

438-7090

. TOXICS CLEANUP

PROGAAM MANAGER

CAROl FLESKES

CAROL PEREZ

438-3007

NUCLEAAAND

MIXED WASTE PAOOAAM MANAGER

VACANT

LlBBIE Me CI.AFUN

438-7020

.'._'.._.".-".__.'~'-"

• •

WASTE MGMT GRANTS

SECTION

DAN SWENSON

CHERGORD

438-7474

s:

zr

.....

(0

(0

w

ENVIRONMENTAl

INVESTIGATIONS &

LABORATORY SERVICES

PROGRAM MANAGER

LYNN SINGLETON

GA YLA DIAMOND

753:2834

WATER OUALITY FINANCIAl ASSISTANCE

PROGRAM MANAGER

CHERYLSTAANGE

BONNIE SIMS

459-610/

WATER RESOURCES PAOOAAM MANAGER

HEClA ADELSMAN

KITTY SLA TER

4~

WASTE REDUCTION

RECYCLING & LITTER CONTROl

PROGRAM MANAGER

MIKE WILSON <AClING)

HELEN FOX

438-7/45

SOLiDANO HAZARDOUS WASTE

PROGRAM MANAGER

TOM EATON

VICKIE VAN NESS

459-6316
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kodiak
Oil & Gas Corp. (the Registrant) for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James P. Henderson, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 9, 2007



|    |  |                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ James P. Henderson       
|    |  | James P. Henderson           
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|    |  | (principal financial officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1832 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1832

  To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
 fathers of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be 
  included with mothers of such veterans as preference eligibles for 
                    treatment in the civil service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2013

   Mr. Bishop of New York (for himself and Mr. Jones) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 21 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
 fathers of certain permanently disabled or deceased veterans shall be 
  included with mothers of such veterans as preference eligibles for 
                    treatment in the civil service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gold Star Fathers Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PREFERENCE ELIGIBLE TREATMENT FOR FATHERS OF CERTAIN 
              PERMANENTLY DISABLED OR DECEASED VETERANS.

    Section 2108(3) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subparagraphs (F) and (G) and inserting the following:
                    ``(F) the parent of an individual who lost his or 
                her life under honorable conditions while serving in 
                the armed forces during a period named by paragraph 
                (1)(A) of this section, if--
                            ``(i) the spouse of that parent is totally 
                        and permanently disabled; or
                            ``(ii) that parent, when preference is 
                        claimed, is unmarried or, if married, legally 
                        separated from his or her spouse;
                    ``(G) the parent of a service-connected permanently 
                and totally disabled veteran, if--
                            ``(i) the spouse of that parent is totally 
                        and permanently disabled; or
                            ``(ii) that parent, when preference is 
                        claimed, is unmarried or, if married, legally 
                        separated from his or her spouse; and''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 90 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### HOCH, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN BOROUGH GAS CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 22, 1906.)

Action by Martha F. Hoch against Brooklyn Borough Gas Company.

No opinion. Motion denied.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Black History Month Fact Sheet and Teaching Guide      

# Resource: Black History Month Fact Sheet and Teaching Guide

This resource contains an overview of Black History Month’s origins in addition to two valuable handouts for educators. The Fun Facts fact sheet (PDF, 1 page) offers a compilation of statistics on Black/African American populations, occupations, and educational attainment. The Teaching Guide (PDF, 2 pages) provides a list of ideas for using the fact sheet with young people in all grade levels.
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/ssi/spotlights/spot-student-earned-income.htm**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/ssi/spotlights/spot-student-earned-income.htm**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Editorial Note on Part 1948
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1948.94 Reporting requirements. ( a ) For planning grants, SF-270 shall be submitted by grantees on an as-needed basis but not more frequently that once every 30 days. SF-269, “Financial Status Report,” and a project performance activity report will be required of all grantees on a quarterly basis. SF-269 and a final project performance report will also be required. These final reports may serve as the last quarterly reports. Grantees shall constantly monitor performance to ensure that time schedules are being met, projected work by time periods is being accomplished, and other performance objectives are being achieved. All grantees except States should submit an original of each report and one copy to the appropriate Rural Development District Office. When the grantee is a State, an original should be submitted to the appropriate Rural Development State Office. The project performance reports shall include, but need not be limited to the following: ( 1 ) A comparison of actual accomplishments to the objectives established for that period;
( 2 ) Reasons why established objectives were not met;
( 3 ) Problems, delays, or adverse conditions which will materially affect attainment of planned project objectives, prevent the meeting of time schedules or objectives, or preclude the attainment of project work elements during established time periods. This disclosure shall be accompanied by a statement of the action taken or contemplated and any Federal assistance needed to resolve the situation; and
( 4 ) Objectives established for the next reporting period.
( b ) For site development and land acquisition grants, grantees shall submit Form SF-271 for payment of site development costs. Multiple advances will be made in accordance with RD Instruction 1902-A (available in any Rural Development office) and will be made as needed to cover required disbursements for not less than 30 day periods. Advances will be requested for the next 30 day period by the grantee on Form SF-272, “Report of Federal Cash Transactions.” Each payment estimate must be approved by the grantee. A final Form SF-272 will be submitted to Rural Development to include the final advance not later than 90 days after the final advance.
§ 1737.1 General statement. ( a ) This part prescribes policies, procedures and responsibilities relating to applications for RUS loans to finance the improvement and extension of telephone service in rural areas. Requirements for both initial and subsequent loans are discussed, with differences pointed out.
( b ) This part sets forth the policies, procedures, and requirements of RUS during the period from the receipt of a completed loan application until the advance of funds. This part sets forth the factors RUS considers in determining the characteristics of a loan, such as the amount of the loan, and conditions to the advance of funds. Involved in this determination are: A loan budget, feasibility study, characteristics letter, loan recommendation, and release of funds. This CFR part supersedes all RUS Bulletins that are in conflict with it.
( c ) See 7 CFR part 1735 on general loan policies, 7 CFR part 1737 for details on submitting a loan application, and 7 CFR part 1744 on the advance of funds.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                        INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

The Board of Directors
Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Assertion, that Wells Fargo Bank N.A. as servicer for the First Security Auto
Grantor Trusts 1997-B, and 1998-A, the First Security Auto Owner Trust 1998-1,
1999-1, 1999-2, 2000-1, and 2000-2, the First Security Auto Conduit 2000-A and
2000-B, and Wells Fargo Auto Owner Trust 2001-A complied in all material
respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers, as applicable, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Management is responsible for Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s compliance with those
minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Wells Fargo
Bank N.A.'s compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on Wells
Fargo Bank N.A.'s compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Wells Fargo Bank N.A. as servicer
for the First Security Auto Grantor Trusts 1997-B, and 1998-A, the First
Security Auto Owner Trust 1998-1, 1999-1, 1999-2, 2000-1, and 2000-2, the First
Security Auto Conduit 2000-A and 2000-B, and Wells Fargo Auto Owner Trust
2001-A complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards,
as applicable, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 is fairly stated,
in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG LLP

March 15, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ralph Valvano, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 12, 1978, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him as a "predicate felon”. Case remitted to Criminal Term to hear and report on defendant’s claim that his predicate felony conviction had been obtained in violation of his constitutional rights (see CPL 400.21, subd 7, par [b]) and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Criminal Term is to file its report *654with all convenient speed. Defendant’s statement that although he admitted the "actions entailed” in his prior felony conviction, he did not admit his guilt and that he thought "it was unconstitutional”, required further inquiry. A hearing will allow the court to examine the claim (see *People v Owens,*58 AD2d 587). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDetermination of the gaseous hydrogen ductile-brittle transition in copper-nickel alloysA series of copper-nickel alloys were fabricated, notched tensile specimens machined for each alloy, and the specimens tested in 34.5 MPa hydrogen and in air. A notched tensile ratio was determined for each alloy and the hydrogen environment embrittlement (HEE) determined for the alloys of 47.7 weight percent nickel to 73.5 weight percent nickel. Stacking fault probability and stacking fault energies were determined for each alloy using the x ray diffraction line shift and line profiles technique. Hydrogen environment embrittlement was determined to be influenced by stacking fault energies; however, the correlation is believed to be indirect and only partially responsible for the HEE behavior of these alloys.Document ID19900003399Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsParr, R. A.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL., United States)*Johnston, M. H.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL., United States)*Davis, J. H.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL., United States)*Oh, T. K.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1985Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:86494NASA-TM-86494Accession Number90N12715Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900003399.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

MARCUS D. NELSON, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 18-0788 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2002-093846

The Honorable Ronda R. Fisk, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Marcus D. Nelson, Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop, Judge Maria Elena Cruz, and 

Judge Kenton D. Jones delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 4-4-2019
STATE v. NELSON

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Marcus D. Nelson seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s third 

successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction 

relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s 

burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying 

the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 

538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of 

discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the 

petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse 

of discretion.

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-65786 of Datawatch  Corporation  on Form S-8 of our report dated November 25,
1996  (which  expresses  an  unqualified  opinion and  includes  an  explanatory
paragraph relating to the merger of Datawatch  Corporation and WorkGroup Systems
Limited, which has been accounted for as a  pooling-of-interests),  appearing in
the  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Datawatch  Corporation  for the year  ended
September 30, 1996.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
December 26, 1996
#### § 1740.81 Default and de-obligation.

RUS reserves the right to deobligate awards to Awardees under this part that demonstrate an insufficient level of performance, wasteful or fraudulent spending, or noncompliance with environmental and historic preservation requirements.
Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brampton Crest International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Brad Hacker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


                                 By: /s/ Brad Hacker
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     Brad Hacker
                                     Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 11, 2006
#### § 1260.520 Responsibility for administration of regulations.

The Livestock and Seed Division shall have the responsibility for administering the provisions of this subpart.