alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNon-linear dynamic analysis of geared systems, part 2A good understanding of the steady state dynamic behavior of a geared system is required in order to design reliable and quiet transmissions. This study focuses on a system containing a spur gear pair with backlash and periodically time-varying mesh stiffness, and rolling element bearings with clearance type non-linearities. A dynamic finite element model of the linear time-invariant (LTI) system is developed. Effects of several system parameters, such as torsional and transverse flexibilities of the shafts and prime mover/load inertias, on free and force vibration characteristics are investigated. Several reduced order LTI models are developed and validated by comparing their eigen solution with the finite element model results. Several key system parameters such as mean load and damping ratio are identified and their effects on the non-linear frequency response are evaluated quantitatively. Other fundamental issues such as the dynamic coupling between non-linear modes, dynamic interactions between component non-linearities and time-varying mesh stiffness, and the existence of subharmonic and chaotic solutions including routes to chaos have also been examined in depth.Document ID19900014416Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSingh, Rajendra*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Houser, Donald R.*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Kahraman, Ahmet*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1990Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-180495NAS 1.26:180495Accession Number90N23732Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-773Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014416.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsImplementation of Sensor and Control Designs for Bioregenerative SystemsThe goal of the Spring 1990 EGM 4001 Design class was to design, fabricate, and test sensors and control systems for a closed loop life support system (CLLSS). The designs investigated were to contribute to the development of NASA's Controlled Ecological Life Support System (CELSS) at Kennedy Space Center (KSC). Designs included a seed moisture content sensor, a porous medium wetness sensor, a plant health sensor, and a neural network control system. The seed group focused on the design and implementation of a sensor that could detect the moisture content of a seed batch. The porous medium wetness group concentrated on the development of a sensor to monitor the amount of nutrient solution within a porous plate incorporating either infrared reflectance or thermal conductance properties. The plant health group examined the possibility of remotely monitoring the health of the plants within the Biomass Production Chamber (BPC) using infrared reflectance properties. Finally, the neural network group concentrated on the ability to use parallel processing in order to control a robot arm and analyze the data from the health sensor to detect regions of a plant.Document ID19900017163Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRodriguez, Pedro R.*(Florida Univ. Gainesville, FL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategoryLife Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186655NAS 1.26:186655Accession Number90N26479Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4435Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017163.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 1726.302 Notice and publication of listed contract forms. ( a ) *Notice.* Upon initially entering into a loan agreement with RUS, borrowers will be provided with all listed contract forms. Thereafter, new or revised listed contract forms promulgated by RUS, including RUS approved exceptions and alternatives, will be sent by regular or electronic mail to the address of the borrower as identified in its loan agreement with RUS.
( b ) *Availability.* Listed standard forms of contract are available from: Rural Utilities Service, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stop 1522, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington DC 20250-1522, telephone number (202) 720-8674. The listed standard forms of contract are also available on the RUS Web site at: *http://www.usda.gov/rus/electric/forms/index.htm .* The listed standard forms of contract can be found in § 1724.304(c), List of Required Contract Forms.
[63 FR 58287, Oct. 30, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 7110, Feb. 13, 2004]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1656 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1656

   To amend the Wagner-Peyser Act to include the Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands in the employment services provided under that 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2013

  Mr. Sablan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Wagner-Peyser Act to include the Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands in the employment services provided under that 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA 
              ISLANDS IN THE WAGNER-PEYSER ACT.

    The Wagner-Peyser Act is amended--
            (1) in section 2(5) (29 U.S.C. 49a(5)), by inserting ``the 
        Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,'' after 
        ``Guam,'';
            (2) in section 5(b)(1) (29 U.S.C. 49d(b)(1)), by inserting 
        ``and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands'' after 
        ``Guam''; and
            (3) in section 6(a) (29 U.S.C. 49e(a))--
                    (A) by striking ``allot to Guam'' and inserting 
                ``allot to--
            ``(1) Guam'';
                    (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands an 
        amount which, in relation to the total amount available for the 
        fiscal year, is equal to the allotment percentage that Guam 
        received of amounts available under this Act in fiscal year 
        1983.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1961 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1961

To amend title 46, United States Code, to extend the exemption from the 
fire-retardant materials construction requirement for vessels operating 
                       within the Boundary Line.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2013

   Mr. Chabot (for himself, Mr. Clay, Mr. Wenstrup, and Mr. Massie) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 46, United States Code, to extend the exemption from the 
fire-retardant materials construction requirement for vessels operating 
                       within the Boundary Line.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXEMPTION.

    Section 3503(a) of title 46, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2008'' and inserting ``2028''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 15.101 Form and content. ( a ) *General.* Motions shall state the relief sought and the authority relied upon. If made before or after the hearing, the motion shall be in writing and filed with the hearing clerk with a copy to all parties. If made at the hearing, they should be stated orally but the hearing officer may require that any motion be reduced to writing and filed and served on all parties in the same manner as a formal motion.
( b ) *Extension of time or postponement.* A request for an extention of time should be filed and served on all parties and should set forth the reasons for the request and may be granted upon a showing of good cause. Answers to such requests are permitted, if made promptly.
§ 1775.11 Priority. The application and supporting information will be used to determine the applicant's priority for available funds. All applications will be reviewed and scored for funding priority in accordance with RUS Guide 1775-2. Points will be given only for factors that are well documented in the application package and, in the opinion of the RUS, meet the objective outlined under each factor. The following is a listing of the criteria that will be used to select the applications that meet the objectives of the technical assistance program. ( a ) Projects proposing to give priority for available services to rural communities having a population less than 5,500 and/or below 2,500.
( b ) Projects proposing to give priority for available services to low income communities.
( c ) Projects that will provide assistance in a multi-State area.
( d ) Points will be awarded for work plans that clearly describe the goals and objectives of the project, how they will be accomplished in targeted communities, and what measurement of accomplishment will be used.
( e ) Projects containing needs assessment (i.e. actual issue or problem being addressed) clearly defined and supported by data.
( f ) Projects containing evaluation methods that are specific to the activity, clearly defined, measurable, and with projected outcomes.
( g ) Applicants proposing to use at least 75 percent of the total grant amount for their own staff, or the staff of an affiliated organization to provide services for a project instead of contracting with an outside organization for the services.
( h ) Projects providing technical assistance/training that accomplish the objective within a 12-month or less timeframe.
( i ) Projects primarily providing “hands on” technical assistance and training, *i.e.,* on-site assistance as opposed to preparation and distribution of printed material, to communities with existing water and waste systems which are experiencing operation and maintenance or management problems; and/or provide technical assistance and training to water supply systems or waste facilities that are unhealthful (*i.e.,* emerging contaminants detected in drinking water and surface water supplies.)
( j ) Cash or in kind support of project from non-federal sources.
( k ) Ability to demonstrate sustainability of project without Federal financial support.
[70 FR 70878, Jan. 7, 2004, as amended at 85 FR 23210, Apr. 27, 2020]
#### § 1730.24 RUS review and evaluation.

RUS will initiate and conduct a periodic review and evaluation of the operations and maintenance practices of each borrower for the purpose of assessing loan security and determining borrower compliance with RUS policy as outlined in this part. This review will normally be done at least once every four years for all Borrowers. The borrower will make available to RUS the borrower's policies, procedures, and records related to the operations and maintenance of its complete system. Reports made by other inspectors (*e.g.,* other Federal agencies, State inspectors, etc.) will also be made available, as applicable. RUS will not duplicate these other reviews but will use their reports to supplement its own review. RUS may inspect facilities, as well as records, and may also observe construction and maintenance work in the field. Key borrower personnel responsible for the facilities being inspected are to accompany RUS during such inspections, unless otherwise determined by RUS. RUS personnel may prepare an independent summary of the operations and maintenance practices of the borrower. The borrower's management will discuss this review and evaluation with its Board of Directors.

[89 FR 17276, Mar. 11, 2024]
§ 1209.62 Confidential treatment. All information obtained from books, records, or reports under the Act, this subpart, and the rules and regulations issued thereunder shall be kept confidential by all persons, including all employees and former employees of the Council, all officers and employees and former officers and employees of the Department, and all officers and employees and former officers and employees of contracting and subcontracting agencies or agreeing parties having access to such information. Such information shall not be available to Council members, producers, importers, or first handlers. Only those persons having a specific need for such information to effectively administer the provisions of this subpart shall have access to such information. Only such information so obtained as the Secretary deems relevant shall be disclosed by them, and then only in a suit or administrative hearing brought at the direction, or on the request, of the Secretary, or to which the Secretary or any officer of the United States is a party, and involving this subpart. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to prohibit: ( a ) The issuance of general statements based upon the reports of the number of persons subject to this subpart or statistical data collected therefrom, which statements do not identify the information furnished by any person; and
( b ) The publication, by direction of the Secretary, of the name of any person who has been adjudged to have violated this subpart, together with a statement of the particular provisions of this subpart violated by such person.
EXHIBIT 15




MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.




Meridian, Idaho







We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and subsidiaries for the three-month periods ended December 31, 2010, and 2009, as indicated in our report dated February 3, 2011; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.




We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-127879, 333-127880, and 333-149275 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-141078 on Form S-3.




We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.









/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPBoise, Idaho


February 3, 2011
#### W. A. Sutton, administrator of the estate of Curtis Sutton, deceased, appellee, v. Village of Rankin, appellant.

Gen. No. 8,269.

Opinion filed January 24, 1929.

Hall *&*Holaday and Acton, Acton & Snyder, for appellant; William M. Acton, of counsel. Bewman & Carter, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46250

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

CORY L. ALVARADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: March 19, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Washington County. Hon. Susan E. Wiebe, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum period of 

confinement of three years, for malicious injury to or destruction of a jail, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before HUSKEY, Judge; LORELLO, Judge;

and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Cory L. Alvarado pleaded guilty to felony malicious injury to or destruction of jail, Idaho 

Code § 18-7018. The district court imposed a unified five-year sentence, with three years 

determinate. Alvarado appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 
2

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Alvarado’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Research
Frontiers Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph M. Harary, President, Treasurer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.

/s/ Joseph M. Harary
Joseph M. Harary
President, Treasurer
and Principal Accounting Officer
March 15, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28857]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR FR-5415-C-25A]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) NOFA for the Choice Neighborhoods Initiative--
Round 1 NOFA Grant Program; Second Technical Correction and Extension 
of Deadline Date

AGENCY: Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 22, 2010, HUD posted a technical correction and 
extended the application deadline date for the Notice of Funding 
Availability (NOFA) for HUD's FY2010 Choice Neighborhoods Initiative--
Round 1. In the October 22, 2010, HUD extended the deadline for 
applications in order to makes changes to the Mapping Tool used to 
determine neighborhood eligibility and stated that a subsequent notice 
would be posted once the Mapping Tool had been revamped and a new 
deadline date would be established. Today's notice announces that HUD 
has posted a notice on Grants.gov that describes changes to the NOFA 
and sets December 9, 2010, as the new deadline date.
    The technical correction which establishes the new deadline date 
can be found using the Department of Housing and Urban Development 
agency link on the Grants.gov/Find Web site at http://www.grants.gov/search/agency.do. A link to Grants.gov is also available on the HUD Web 
site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The 
Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for the Choice 
Neighborhood Initiative Program is 14.889. Applications must be 
submitted electronically through Grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding specific program 
requirements should be directed to the agency contact identified in the 
program NOFA. Questions regarding the 2010 General Section should be 
directed to the Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight 
at 202-708-0667 (this is not a toll-free number) or the NOFA 
Information Center at 1-800-HUD-8929 (toll-free). Persons with hearing 
or speech impairments may access these numbers via TTY by calling the 
Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.

    Dated: November 9, 2010.
Barbara S. Dorf,
Director, Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight, 
Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-28857 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1412.84 Impact of CTAP application on ARC or PLC. ( a ) Applications for CTAP do not establish eligibility for ARC or PLC. Interested producers are required to file documents that are specifically required for CTAP as specified on the CTAP application. An application for CTAP will not be considered an intent to participate in ARC or PLC and, conversely, an election or enrollment in ARC or PLC will not establish eligibility for CTAP.
( b ) [Reserved]