alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1703.313 Compliance with other regulations. ( a ) Investments in a rural economic development project made by an electric borrower under this subpart are subject to the provisions of 7 CFR part 1717, Subpart N, Investments, Loans and Guarantees by Electric Borrowers.
( b ) Investments in a rural economic development project made by a telephone borrower under this subpart are subject to the provisions of 7 CFR Part 1744, Post Loan Policies and Procedures Common to Guaranteed and Insured Loans.
§ 1774.15 Selection Criteria. Projects will be selected based primarily on the funding priorities in 7 CFR 1780.17. The Program Official discretionary points stated in 7 CFR1780.17 (e) can also include consideration of the following criteria: ( a ) Systems with limited resources.
( b ) Smallest systems with lowest incomes.
( c ) Funds availability.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6096
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM B. HALL, a/k/a Bill, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-87-100-N) Submitted: September 17, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996 Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William B. Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant seeks to appeal the district's order denying his motions for production of grand jury documents, production of arrest records and associated documents, and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court, United States v. Hall , No. CR-87-100-N (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 1996), and we conclude that the appeal is frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 21.1

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


     Certain of Phosphate Resource Partners Limited Partnership's
subsidiaries are listed below.  These subsidiaries are all included in the
Company's consolidated financial statements, and collectively, together
with Phosphate Resource Partners Limited Partnership, account for more than
90 percent of consolidated net sales, earnings (loss) before income taxes,
extraordinary items and cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principal, and total assets.


                            State of           Name Under Which
                          Organization         It Does Business
                          ---------------      ----------------

Agrico Chemical Company    Delaware                 Same
IMC-Agrico Company         Delaware                 Same
IMC-Agrico MP, Inc.        Delaware                 Same
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel Research Centers in Trauma, Burn and Peri-Operative Injury.                    

*Date:*                         December 3, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Residence Inn By Marriott-Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brian R. Pike, PhD Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-594-3907.                         *pikbr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

                        Dated:                         *November 3, 2010.*

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 2010-28300 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
§ 1735.46 Loan security documents. ( a ) Loans are to be repaid according to their terms. RUS generally obtains a first lien on all assets of the borrower. This lien shall be in the form of a mortgage by the borrower to the Government or a deed of trust made by and between the borrower and a trustee, satisfactory to the Administrator, together with such security agreements, financing statements, or other security documents as RUS may deem necessary in a particular case. Where a borrower is unable by reason of pre-existing encumbrances, or otherwise, to furnish a first mortgage lien on its entire system the Administrator may, if he determines such security to be reasonably adequate and the form and nature thereof otherwise appropriate, accept other forms of security. See RUS Bulletins 320-4, 320-22, 321-2, 322-2, 323-1, and 326-1 for details. See 7 CFR part 1744, subpart B for information on lien accommodations and subordinations.
( b ) Loan security documents of borrowers with loans approved after October 6, 1997 will provide limits on allowable cash distributions in any calendar year as follows: ( 1 ) No more than 25 percent of the prior calendar year's net earnings or margins if the borrower's net worth is at least 1 percent of its total assets after the distribution is made;
( 2 ) No more than 50 percent of the prior calendar year's net earnings or margins if the borrower's net worth is at least 20 percent of its total assets after the distribution is made;
( 3 ) No more than 75 percent of the prior calendar year's net earnings or margins if the borrower's net worth is at least 30 percent of its total assets after the distribution is made; or
( 4 ) No limit on distributions if the borrower's net worth is at least 40 percent of its total assets after the distribution is made.
( c ) Borrowers that have not received a loan after October 6, 1997 may request the Administrator to apply these requirements to them. Borrowers may request in writing that RUS substitute the new requirements described in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(4) of this section. Upon request by the borrower, the provisions of the borrower's loan documents restricting cash distributions or investments shall not be enforced to the extent that such provisions are inconsistent with this section.
( d ) Rural development investments meeting the criteria set forth in 7 CFR part 1744, subpart D, will not be counted against a borrower's allowable cash distributions in any calendar year (7 U.S.C. 926).
( e ) References to a borrower's mortgage in this section include deeds of trust and any other loan document applying the same requirements to a borrower.
( f ) This section does not limit the rights of any parties to the mortgage other than RUS.
[54 FR 13351, Apr. 3, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39395, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 29537, June 8, 1994; 62 FR 46871, Sept. 5, 1997; 84 FR 59922, Nov. 7, 2019]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Candela Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gerard E. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Gerard E. Puorro
----------------------------
Gerard E. Puorro
Chief Executive Officer
September 23, 2002





                                       4
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 22

- 00107

- CV

IN RE JBS CARRIERS, INC. and Alicia Faye Roberts

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 6, 2022

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

On February 2 1 , 2022, relat or s filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for

temporary relief requesting a stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the

petition for writ of mandamus. The real par t y in interest filed a response to which relator s replie d.

On March 24, 2022 , relator s filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the petition for writ of

mandamus. We grant the motion and dismiss the original proceeding. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1)

– (2). Relators’ motion for temporary relief is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020CI07282 , styled Elizabeth Serrano v. Alicia Faye Roberts and JBS

Carriers, Inc. , pending in the 225th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales

presiding.
# Billings Flying Service, Inc. 6309 Jellison Road Billings, MT 59101 Hangar Phone: 406

- 252

- 6937 **Owners:** Facsimile: 406

- 259

- 4166 Al Blain Al Blain’s Cell: 406

- 698

- 4419 Gary Blain Gary Blain’s Cell: 406

- 671

- 2789 **Email: billingsflyingser** **v @usadig.com**  Website: bi llingsflyings ervice inc .com 

### To whom it may concern, Billings Flying Service , Inc. is the holder of exemption number 11180. In that exemption the FAA recognizes that it is reasonable and safe to train pilots in restricted category aircraft. As support for our exemption we used exemption number 10863. Under that exemption the FAA allowed Sikorsky helicopters to train pilots that are not employed by them. The BFS exemption is limited to company employed pilots because we did not request to train non - company employed pilots. I am writing to request this be added back into our e xemption so we are allowed to train both company employed and non - company pilots in our restricted category aircraft. Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you. Jeff Cook Jeffcook13@gmai l.com 406 - 579 - 1195
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Common Questions About Vaccines      

# Resource: Common Questions About Vaccines

This webpage provides parents with answers to common questions about vaccines. The page covers questions related to vaccine safety, side effects, schedule for vaccines, and protection from diseases. **Learn more.**
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 11


                  SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              for the years ending December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             1995               1994              1993
                                                             ----               ----              ----

<S>                                                         <C>               <C>                 <C>       
Net (loss)                                                  $(4,126,115)      $(1,540,644)      $  (179,816)

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year                                   2,157,253         2,157,253         2,157,253

Net (loss) per common share                                 $     (1.91)      $      (.71)      $      (.08)

                  PRIMARY (1)


Net (loss)                                                  $(4,126,115)      $(1,540,644)      $  (179,816)

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year                                    2,157,253        2,157,253         2,157,253

Net (loss) per common share                                 $      (1.91)     $      (.71)      $      (.08)
                                                                                    

                  FULLY DILUTED (1)


Net (loss)                                                  $(4,126,115)      $(1,540,644)      $  (179,816)

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year                                    2,157,253        2,157,253         2,157,253

Net (loss) per common share                                 $      (1.91)     $      (.71)      $      (.08)


</TABLE>




(1)  This calculation is submitted in accordance with the regulations of the
     Securities and Exchange although not required by APB Opinion No. 15 because
     it results in dilution of less than 3%.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-02T15:12:21-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### BRECHTLEIN, Respondent, v. GREENWOOD CEMETERY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Mary Brechtlein against the Greenwood Cemetery.

No opinion, judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
#### In re LONG ISLAND R. CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 5, 1906.)

In the matter of the application of the Long Island Railroad Company and another for the construction of an electric railroad on portions of Atlantic avenue in the borough of Brooklyn, etc.

No opinion. Application granted, newspapers designated, and order signed.
PUBLIC LAW 109–208—MAR. 23, 2006 120 STAT. 317

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2275:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Feb. 10, considered and passed Senate.

Feb. 15, considered and passed House, amended.

Mar. 16, Senate concurred in House amendment.

Æ

Public Law 109–208

109th Congress

An Act

An Act to temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency

Management Agency for carrying out the national flood insurance program.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Flood Insurance Program Enhanced Borrowing Authority Act of 2006’’.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN BORROWING AUTHORITY.

The first sentence of subsection (a) of section 1309 of the

National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)), as

amended by the National Flood Insurance Program Further

Enhanced Borrowing Authority Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–106;

119 Stat. 2288), is amended by striking ‘‘$18,500,000,000’’ and

inserting ‘‘$20,775,000,000’’.

SEC. 3. EMERGENCY SPENDING.

Amendments made pursuant to this Act are designated as

emergency spending, as provided under section 402 of H. Con.

Res. 95 (109th Congress).

Approved March 23, 2006.

National Flood

Insurance

Program

Enhanced

Borrowing

Authority Act

of 2006.

42 USC 4001

note.

Mar. 23, 2006

[S. 2275]
----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |

| Dated:      August 4, 2008                                                                         |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|  /s/      Yijun Wang                                                                          |   |   |   |
| Yijun      WangChief      Executive Officer, President, Director(Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
#### §§ 1788.7-1788.10 [Reserved]
§ 1776.17 Revolving loan fund maintenance. As long as any part of the DWS grant remains available for lending, and loans made from the revolving loan fund have an outstanding balance due, the grant recipient must maintain the revolving loan fund for the purposes set forth in § 1776.13. ( a ) All DWS grant funds received by a grant recipient must be deposited into the revolving loan fund.
( b ) The grant recipient may transfer additional assets into the revolving loan fund.
( c ) All cash and other assets of the revolving loan fund shall be deposited in a separate bank account or accounts.
( d ) No cash or other assets of any other fund maintained by the grant recipient shall be commingled with the cash and other assets of the revolving loan fund.
( e ) All moneys deposited in such bank account or accounts shall be money of the revolving loan fund.
( f ) Loans to loan recipients are advanced from the revolving loan fund.
( g ) The revolving loan fund will consist of receivables created by making loans, the grant recipient's security interest in collateral pledged by loan recipients, collections on the receivables, interest, fees, and any other income or assets derived from the operation of the revolving loan fund.
( h ) The portion of the revolving loan fund that consists of DWS grant funds, on a last-in-first-out basis, may be used for only those purposes set forth in this part.
( i ) The grant recipient must submit an annual budget of proposed administrative costs for RUS approval. The amount removed from the revolving loan fund for administrative costs in any year must be reasonable; must not exceed the actual cost of operating the revolving loan fund, including loan servicing and providing technical assistance; and must not exceed the amount approved by RUS in the grant recipient's annual budget.
( j ) A reasonable amount of revolved funds must be used to create a reserve for bad debts. Reserves should be accumulated over a period of years. The total amount should not exceed maximum expected losses, considering the quality of the grant recipient's portfolio of loans. Unless the grant recipient provides loss and delinquency records that, in the opinion of RUS, justifies different amounts, a reserve for bad debts of 6 percent of outstanding loans must be accumulated over three years and then maintained as set forth in the grant agreement.
( k ) Any cash in the revolving loan fund from any source that is not needed for debt service, approved administrative costs, or reasonable reserves must be available for additional loans to loan recipients.
( l ) All reserves and other cash in the revolving loan fund not immediately needed for loans to loan recipients or other authorized uses must be deposited in accounts in banks or other financial institutions. Such accounts must be fully covered by Federal deposit insurance or fully collateralized with U.S. Government obligations, and must be interest bearing. Any interest earned thereon remains a part of the revolving loan fund.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Adonis Bolling, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on December 15, 1978, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sullivan, Lupiano, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.