alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit10_1.htm






  





  











  



Romantique Ltd.


64 W 48th St Ste 1107


New York, NY 10036-1708






























 


 


 


 


September 30, 2012


 


 


 


 


This agreement is entered into between Romantique LTD, hereinafter referred to as “The Company” and Yitzchok Gurary hereinafter referred to as “The Salesman”.


 


The Company agrees to engage the services of the Salesman for a period of 12 months beginning Oct 1, 2012.


 


The salesman agrees to utilize his knowledge, contacts and sales skills on behalf of the Company, to promote the Company’s products and maximize its sales.


 


The Salesman’s compensation will be 3% of Net Sales.


 


 


 


/s/                                 10/1/2012                                  /s/                              10/1/2012


-------------------------     ---------                                     -----------------------     -----------


Romantique LTD            Date                                          Yitzchok Gurary            Date


 


 







64th W 48th Street, Ste 1107 New York, NY 10036    PH 212-840-8477 FAX 212-840-8478
#### § 1773.33 [Reserved]
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14

- 749 V

Filed: June 16, 2015

Not for P ublication

*************************************

SUSAN CHARBONNEAU

, *

*

Petitioner

, *

*

* Damages decision based on stipulation;

v. * influenza (flu) vaccine; shoulder injury

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Amber D. Wilson

, Washington, DC

, for petitioner

. Justine E. Walters , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On June 15 , 2015 , the parties filed the attached stipulati on in which they agreed to settle

this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner allege s that she suffered a shoulder injury

that w as caused by her Septem ber 2 1, 2011 receipt of influenza (“flu ”) vaccine

. Respondent

denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s shoulder injury, any other injury, or her current

condition

. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned exp lanation for the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercia l or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to de lete such information prior to the document ’ s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

delete such material from public access.2

The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby

adopts the parties ’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and

o n the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of

$8 0 ,000.00

, repre senting reimbursement for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa

- 15(a) (2006). The award shall be in the form of a check payable to petitioner in the

amount of $8 0 ,000.00.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 16, 2015 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Specia l Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
- U.S. Mint /
- FOIA

# The Freedom of Information Act

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) enables anyone to request United States Mint records. Currently, the United States Mint offers these online resources:

- The FOIA Handbook
- Submit an Online Request
- The Electronic Reading Room

## About FOIA

FOIA established a presumption that records of the Executive Branch of the United States government are accessible to the public. However, this was not always the policy regarding federal information disclosure. Before the FOIA in 1966, individuals had to prove their right to examine these government records.

When the FOIA passed, the burden of proof shifted from the individual to the government. In the past, the public was required to show a need for government information. FOIA replaced the “need to know” standard with the “right to know” standard.

Now, the government must justify its need for secrecy. The FOIA sets standards for determining which records must be made available to the public and which records can be withheld from disclosure. Additionally, if you are denied access to records, FOIA allows you to appeal that decision.

Above all, the statute requires federal agencies to provide as much information as possible to the public.
**CERTIFICATIONS      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT**

**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 20,                2008 |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |   | /s/                Julio Cesar                Alonso                               |
|                                             |   | Julio                Cesar Alonso                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|                                             |   | Chief                Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                   |

----
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                 FORM 10-KSB/A1

(Mark One)

[X]  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [Fee Required]
         For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [No Fee Required]
        For the transition period from____________to_____________

                         Commission file number 0-15927

                               COMPUTER POWER INC.

                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)

New Jersey                                       22-1981869
(State or other jurisdiction of                  (I.R.S. Employer
 Incorporation organization)                     Identification No.)

124 West Main Street, High Bridge, NJ              08829
(Address of principal executive offices)         (Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number:  908-638-8000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Exchange act: None




      Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
                     Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
                                (Title of Class)


Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No __

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent  filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure  will be contained,  to
the  best  of  registrant's   knowledge,  in  definitive  proxy  or  information
statements  incorporated  by  reference  in Part III of this Form  10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [x ]

       State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $8,443,473

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by  non-affiliates  computed
by  reference  to the price at which the stock was sold,  or the average bid and
asked prices of such stock as of March 29,  1999:  $349,094 The number of shares
outstanding  of each of the issuer's  classes of common  equity,  as of March 2,
1999, was 2,828,300.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one)
Yes_______        No    X




<PAGE>





                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the  requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
Act of 1934,  the Registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB
for December 31, 1998 to be signed on its behalf by the  undersigned,  thereunto
duly authorized.

                                     COMPUTER POWER, INC.


                                     By:_s/John M. Perry___
                                     John M. Perry, President

Dated: April 1, 1999





2

cpi-10k.98A




<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           18549
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 19045
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     123911
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          123911
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            123911
<LOANS>                                         407042
<ALLOWANCE>                                       5850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  585869
<DEPOSITS>                                      512183
<SHORT-TERM>                                      2916
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               4180
<LONG-TERM>                                      11240
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         12677
<OTHER-SE>                                       42673
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  585869
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  36335
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 5722
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   831
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 42888
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               21182
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 903
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            20803
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      892
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  12867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  11070
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       11070
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      7657
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.85
<LOANS-NON>                                       6455
<LOANS-PAST>                                      1988
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   8443
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  5850
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     1774
<RECOVERIES>                                       882
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 5850
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              5850
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1822.272 Approval or disapproval of a loan.

The provisions of 7 CFR part 3560, subpart B will be followed.

[69 FR 69103, Nov. 26, 2004]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPlanning for Space Station Freedom laboratory payload integrationSpace Station Freedom is being developed to support extensive missions involving microgravity research and applications. Requirements for on-orbit payload integration and the simultaneous payload integration of multiple mission increments will provide the stimulus to develop new streamlined integration procedures in order to take advantage of the increased capabilities offered by Freedom. The United States Laboratory and its user accommodations are described. The process of integrating users' experiments and equipment into the United States Laboratory and the Pressurized Logistics Modules is described. This process includes the strategic and tactical phases of Space Station utilization planning. The support that the Work Package 01 Utilization office will provide to the users and hardware developers, in the form of Experiment Integration Engineers, early accommodation assessments, and physical integration of experiment equipment, is described. Plans for integrated payload analytical integration are also described.Document ID19900016731Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsWillenberg, Harvey J.*(Boeing Aerospace Co. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Torre, Larry P.*(Boeing Aerospace Co. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186751NAS 1.26:186751Accession Number90N26047Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-50000Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016731.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 10.17


 


Marten Transport, Ltd.


2005 Non-employee Director
Compensation Summary


 


The Board of
Directors of Marten Transport, Ltd. approved the following fee schedule for
non-employee directors for fiscal year 2005:


 


	
  Annual Retainer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  15,000

  	
   

  
	
  Audit Committee chair

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  20,000

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation Committee chair

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  5,000

  	
   

  
	
  Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee chair

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,500

  	
   

  



 


The company generally pays non-employee directors a fee of $500 for
each Board or committee meeting attended, and reimburses them for out-of-pocket
expenses of attending meetings.
#### Marie Smith, as Administratrix of the Estate of Paul L. Smith, Deceased, Respondent, v Delta D & I Corp. et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Delta D & I Corp., Appellant, v Marie Smith, as Administratrix of the Estate of Paul L. Smith, Deceased, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

(1) from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered March 21, 1979 in Albany County, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in Action No. 1, and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint in Action No. *10102, and (2) from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Hughes at Special Term. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Coyne, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 12, 1978, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and a new trial ordered. Defendant argues that the prosecutor’s summation exceeded the permissible bounds of fair comment and operated to deprive him of a fair trial, citing, *inter alia,*his comments (1) asserting (ostensibly on the issue of defendant’s credibility) that the defendant had, in the past, broken into homes, like those of the jurors; (2) opining that there is nothing so violative of an individual’s right to privacy as finding that a burglar had broken into his home; (3) arguing that the defendant was so desperate for money that he had used his deceased father’s credit cards in order to obtain goods and services, thus refusing to let "his own dead father’s reputation rest in peace”; and (4) urging the jurors to find the defendant guilty so that the 75-year-old complainant could sleep at night. We agree. In combination these remarks may have obscured from the jury the fact that the only real issue before them was that of defendant’s guilt or innocence of the crime charged, and, in our opinion, their cumulative effect was so prejudicial as to necessitate a new trial (see *People v Burnside,*52 AD2d 626; *People v Brown,*60 AD2d 917). We note in passing that the prosecutor was improperly permitted to cross-examine the defendant with respect to the fact of certain arrests and indictments (see *People v Morrison,*195 NY 116), and that the foregoing contributed to the need for a new trial. Mangano, J. P., Gulotta and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Cohalan, J.,

dissents and votes to affirm the judgment with the following memorandum: Even if under normal circumstances it could be said that the District Attorney exceeded the bounds of propriety in his cross-examination and summation, under the circumstances presented here his remarks were justified in that they were provoked by the remarks of defense counsel. Further, in several of the instances alluded to no objection was made. Hence, the items were not preserved for appellate review.
§ 1200.202 Proposals. ( a ) An order may be proposed by any association of producers of an agricultural commodity, by any person that may be affected by the issuance of an order with respect to an agricultural commodity, or by the Secretary. Any person or organization other than the Secretary proposing an order shall file with the Administrator a written proposal.
( b ) Upon receipt of a proposal, the Administrator shall investigate and evaluate the proposal.
( c ) If the proposal is submitted by an association of producers of the agricultural commodity or by any person that may be affected by the issuance of an order, and the investigation and consideration lead the Administrator to conclude that the proposed order will not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act, the Administrator shall deny the proposal. The Administrator will promptly notify the proponent(s) of such denial, which will be accompanied by a brief statement of the grounds for the denial.
( d ) If the proposal was submitted by an association of producers of the agricultural commodity or by any person that may be affected by the issuance of an order and the investigation and consideration lead the Administrator to conclude that an order will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act, the Administrator will promptly notify the proponent(s) of such conclusion, and the proponent(s) will be required to post a bond or other collateral in accordance with § 1200.204.
( e ) If the Administrator concludes that an order will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act, the Administrator shall publish the proposed order in the Federal Register and give due notice and opportunity for public comment on the proposed order.
#### §§ 1773.11-1773.19 [Reserved]
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. CORBALIS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York against Thomas F. Corbalis.

No opinion. Judgment of conviction affirmed.