alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of M.L. Macadamia Orchards, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned management of the Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
| /s/   Dennis J. Simonis                 |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   |
| Dennis   J. Simonis                     |   |
| President   and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| March 15,   2011                   |   |

 

----
2006-0682.

#### Showalter v. Jeffreys.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Derek Showalter. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-22-0000370

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

MARISA MADISON, fka MARISA M. PROVOST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

CHARLETON J. PROVOST, Defendant-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 2DV181000378)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Chan, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Defendant-Appellee Charleton J.

Provost's (Provost) January 4, 2023 Motion to Dismiss [PlaintiffAppellant Marisa Madison's (Madison)] Appeal From the Order on

[Madison's] Motion and Affidavit for Post-Decree Relief Filed on

April 27, 2022 (Motion), the papers in support, the record, and

there being no opposition, it appears that:

(1) Madison defaulted on the original deadlines for the

statement of jurisdiction and opening brief; 

(2) On August 11, 2022, the appellate clerk entered a

default notice informing Madison that the time for filing the

statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the

matter would be called to the court's attention on August 22,

2022, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of

the appeal, under Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP)

Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Madison could request relief from

default by motion;

(3) On September 8, 2022, the court granted Madison's

August 18, 2022 motion for relief from default and extended the

deadline to file the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000370

10-MAY-2023

07:52 AM

Dkt. 37 OGMD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

to October 3, 2022. The order states, "Any further default of

the statement of jurisdiction or opening brief may result in

sanctions authorized by HRAP 12.1(e) and 30, including, without

limitation, monetary sanctions, the appeal being dismissed, or

both"; 

(4) On September 27, 2022, Madison filed a motion for a

second extension of time for the opening brief. Madison did not

file the statement of jurisdiction or seek a corresponding

extension of time;

(5) On September 29, 2022, the court granted in part

the September 27, 2022 motion and extended the deadline for

filing of the opening brief to November 2, 2022; 

(6) Madison did not submit any additional filings after

the court's order of September 29, 2022;

(7) In the Motion, Provost seeks to dismiss the appeal

for failure to file the statement of jurisdiction and opening

brief. Madison did not file a response; and 

(8) Dismissal of this appeal is authorized under HRAP

Rules 12.1(e) and 30.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is

granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 10, 2023.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

2
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Roy EATON, Respondent. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Genevieve H. EATON, Respondent.

No. 13806.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 10, 1954.

EL Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson, Joseph F. Goetten, Meyer Rothwacks, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Charles W. Davis, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Milton Cades, Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades, J. Russell Cades, Eugene H. Beebe, Honolulu, Hawaii, for respondents.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue seeks review of two decisions of the Tax Court — a decision redetermining the income tax liability of Roy Eaton for the calendar years 1943, 1944, 1945 and 1946 and a decision redetermining the income tax liability of Genevieve H. Eaton for the calendar years 1945 and 1946. The decisions are affirmed on the authority of Commissioner v. Sultan, 9 Cir., 210 F.2d 652, affirming Sultan v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 715; Commissioner v. Brodhead, 9 Cir., 210 F.2d 652, affirming Brodhead v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 726.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Douglas E. Barnett, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of UGS Corp.;
2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b.  Omitted as permitted;  c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
 b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 16, 2005    /s/ Douglas E. Barnett   Douglas E. Barnett Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
38
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

              Consent of UHY Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp CPAs, LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-38606) of Blue Dolphin Energy Company and in the related Prospectus
of our report dated March 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) of Blue Dolphin Energy
Company for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ UHY Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp CPAs, LLP
Houston, Texas
July 5, 2005
#### CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HARWEIAN CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

Action by the city of New York against the Harweian Company. S. Rothschild, for appellant T. Connoly, fdr respondent

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
#### SCHNECK, Respondent, v. DANZIGER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by George Schneck against Lena Danziger.

No opinion. Motion to vacate judgment granted, without costs, on the authority of Mahon v. Mahon, 64 App. Div. 262, 72 N. Y. Supp. 102, and order dismissing appeal amended, so as to explicitly provide that said dismissal is with $10 costs.
EXHIBIT 23-1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM CONSENT

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
The Navigators Group, Inc.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 33-51608, No. 333-97183 and No. 333-106317 on
Form S-8 of The Navigators Group, Inc. and subsidiaries, our report dated February 28, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of The Navigators
Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and related financial statements schedules, Management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31,
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Navigators Group, Inc. and subsidiaries.

/s/
KPMG LLP

New
York, New York
February 28, 2005

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Annual Report of GreenestoneHealthcare Corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Shawn E. Leon, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify tothe best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
§ 1710.301 Financial forecasts—distribution borrowers. ( a ) Financial forecasts prepared by distribution borrowers shall cover at least a ten-year period, unless a shorter period is authorized by other RUS regulations.
( b ) In addition to the requirements set forth in § 1710.300 of this part, financial forecasts prepared by distribution borrowers in support of a loan application shall: ( 1 ) Include expenditures for any maintenance determined to be needed in the current system's operation and maintenance review and evaluation in order to comply with mortgage covenants and prudent utility practice;
( 2 ) Fully explain the basis for the power cost projections used. Generally, the power supplier's most recent forecasted rates shall be used; and
( 3 ) Use RUS Form 325 or computer-generated equivalent reports.
#### §§ 1737.62-1737.69 [Reserved]
#### § 1910.52 [Reserved]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: When Your Child Is Missing: A Family Survival Guide      

# Resource: When Your Child Is Missing: A Family Survival Guide

This guide (PDF, 95 pages) is designed to help families take necessary steps, contact the right people, and know how to move forward when their child is missing. This fifth edition contains checklists with critical information to help parents and caretakers work with law enforcement, the media, search and rescue professionals, and volunteers. The guide also suggests ways for families to maintain their financial, physical, and emotional well-being and provides a framework for understanding the different types of missing persons cases and related terminology.**Learn more** (PDF, 95 pages).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                         179,907
<SECURITIES>                                    29,946
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,206
<INVENTORY>                                    115,092
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               436,831
<PP&E>                                         163,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 591,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,349
<BONDS>                                        207,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,480
<OTHER-SE>                                     258,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   591,710
<SALES>                                        659,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               659,400
<CGS>                                          512,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  512,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (50)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,167
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,741
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             35,426
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,426
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
        

</TABLE>
SCAD-19-0000849

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

In re: Application for the Reinstatement of 

ANDREW A. AGARD

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(Prior Supreme Court No. SCAD-13-0006297;

Prior ODC Case No. 13-063-9133)

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Report, Findings, and

Recommendation for the Reinstatement of Petitioner Andrew A.

Agard to the practice of law, submitted to this court on 

December 11, 2019 by the Disciplinary Board of the Hawai#i

Supreme Court, the record in this matter and in SCAD-13-0006297,

and the lack of opposition from the Office of Disciplinary

Counsel,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Andrew A. Agard’s petition

for reinstatement is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 2.17(b) of the

Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), that

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCAD-19-0000849

23-DEC-2019

01:25 PM
Andrew A. Agard is reinstated to the practice of law in this

jurisdiction. This order is effective upon filing, subject to

the conditions of RSCH Rule 17(d) concerning proper registration

with the Hawai#i State Bar Association and the payment of

required dues.

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that, pursuant to RSCH Rule

2.17(d), Petitioner Agard shall bear the costs of the

reinstatement proceedings, upon the timely submission of a

verified bill of costs, within 60 days of the date of entry of

this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 23, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
§ 1901.505 Certificates of beneficial ownership in Rural Development loans. ( a ) *Special trust of loans* — ( 1 ) *Establishment of special trusts.* From time to Rural Development will place in special trusts unmature loans evidenced by notes or other instruments. Loans may be placed into or removed from a special trust, but there will always be maintained in such trusts loans on which the unpaid amount is at least equal to the face value of the outstanding unmature certificates evidencing beneficial ownership in such special trust as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) *Beneficial ownership of special trusts.* To permit interested persons to acquire a beneficial ownership of loans comprising a special trust established under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, Rural Development will sell certificates which will evidence beneficial ownership of an interest in the special trust to the extent of the face value of such certificates. Rural Development will own an interest in special trusts equal to the amount by which the unpaid principal amount of loans comprising the trusts exceeds the face value of all outstanding certificates evidencing beneficial ownership in such trusts.
( b ) *Sale of certificates.* Rural Development will offer certificates for sale from time to time on such terms and conditions it may deem appropriate. Sales made by the Finance Office shall be made by its Director. No sale in excess of $1 million will be made to any one investor without prior approval of the Associate Administrator or his designee. The terms and limitations of sales are subject to change from time to time, and may be obtained from the Finance Office. ( 1 ) *Form of certificates.* The certificates may be interest-bearing or non-interest-bearing. The certificates may be made payable to the bearer or registered holder thereof, and will be negotiable. The certificates will be issued in denominations specified in the invitations for bid or other announcement of sale.
( 2 ) *Issue date and maturity date of certificates.* The certificates will be issued on such dates and mature on such dates as specified in the invitation for bids or other announcement of sale. Such dates will appear on the face of the certificates.
[41 FR 51799, Nov. 24, 1976, as amended at 80 FR 9868, Feb. 24, 2015]
§ 1738.52 Eligible projects. To be eligible for assistance under this part, the Applicant must: ( a ) Agree to complete the build-out of the broadband system described in the application within 5 years from the day the Applicant is notified that funds are available. Under the terms of the Award documents, this 5-year period will commence from the date that the legal documents are cleared, and funds are made available to the Awardee. The application must demonstrate that all proposed construction can be completed within this 5-year period with the exception of CPE;
( b ) Demonstrate an ability to provide service at the broadband lending speed to all premises in the proposed funded service area; and
( c ) Provide additional equity, if necessary, to ensure financial feasibility (see § 1738.204) as determined by the Administrator.
( d ) For loan guarantees, the underlying loan must be issued on a project that meets all eligibility requirements required in this part.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Candela Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard E. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ GERARD E.  PUORRO     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Gerard E. Puorro          |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |   |
| September 11,  2006  |   |

 

----
|Nicholas Company, Inc.700 North Water StreetMilwaukee, WI 53202
|---------------------------------------------------------------



|August 5, 2009
|--------------



|VIA EDGAR
|---------



|U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission100 F Street, NEWashington, D.C. 20549
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

|RE: |  | Nicholas Fund, Inc. (the "Fund")     
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|    |  | Registration Nos. 002-30447/811-01728



|Ladies and Gentlemen:
|---------------------

Pursuant to Rule 497(j) under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "1933 Act"), as amended, the Fund hereby certifies that the forms of Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information that would
have been filed under Rule 497(b) or (c) under the 1933 Act would not have differed from those contained in the Fund's most recent Registration Statement on Form N-1A which was filed electronically on July 30, 2009 as Amendment No. 57 under the 1933
Act to the Fund's Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the 1933 Act.

If you have any questions or require further information, do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (414) 272-4650 or Marcia Y. Lucas of Michael Best & Friedrich LLP at (414)
270-2739.



|Sincerely,
|----------



|/s/ Jeffrey T. May
|------------------



|Jeffrey T. MayNicholas Company, Inc.
|------------------------------------

---