alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1992 

AN ACT 

To amend the requirements relating to assessment of Israel’s 

qualitative military edge over military threats, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1992 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Israel QME Enhance3 ment Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO 

5 ASSESSMENT OF ISRAEL’S QUALITATIVE 

6 MILITARY EDGE OVER MILITARY THREATS. 

7 (a) ASSESSMENT REQUIRED; REPORTS.—Section 

8 201 of Public Law 110–429 (122 Stat. 4843; 22 U.S.C. 

9 2776 note) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘an ongoing 

11 basis’’ and inserting ‘‘a biennial basis’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (c)(2)— 

13 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘QUADREN14 NIAL’’ and inserting ‘‘BIENNIAL’’; and 

15 (B) in the text, by striking ‘‘Not later than 

16 four years after the date on which the President 

17 transmits the initial report under paragraph 

18 (1), and every four years thereafter,’’ and in19 serting ‘‘Not later than one year after the date 

20 of the enactment of the Israel QME Enhance21 ment Act, and biennially thereafter,’’. 

22 (b) REPORT.— 

23 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after 

24 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

25 of State shall submit to the appropriate congres26 sional committees a report on— 
3 

•HR 1992 EH

1 (A) the range of cyber and asymmetric 

2 threats posed to Israel by state and non-state 

3 actors; and 

4 (B) the joint efforts of the United States 

5 and Israel to address the threats identified in 

6 subparagraph (A). 

7 (2) FORM.—The report required under para8 graph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, 

9 but may contain a classified annex. 

10 (3) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMIT11 TEES DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘ap12 propriate congressional committees’’ means the 

13 Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Rep14 resentatives and the Committee on Foreign Rela15 tions of the Senate. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1992 

AN ACT 

To amend the requirements relating to assessment 

threats, and for other purposes. of Israel’s qualitative military edge over military
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1951.17-1951.24 [Reserved]
#### § 1773.39 [Reserved]
§ 1781.1 Purpose. This part prescribes the policies and procedures for making: ( a ) Watershed (WS) loans and Watershed (WS) advances for works of improvement in a watershed project; and
( b ) Resource Conservation and Development (RCD) loans for measures or projects needed to implement the RCD area plan to achieve objectives in an RCD area.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEvaluation of bearing configurations using the single bearing tester in liquid nitrogenVarious bearing configurations were tested using the Marshall Space Flight Center single bearing tester with LN2 as the cryogenic coolant. The baseline was one Rocketdyne phase one high pressure oxidizer turbopump (HPOTP) pump end 45-mm bore bearing. The bearing configurations that were tested included a Salox/M cage configuration, a silicon nitride ball configuration, an elongated cage configuration, and a Bray 601 grease configuration.Document ID19910012219Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJett, T.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Hall, P.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Thom, R.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1991Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-103527NAS 1.15:103527Accession Number91N21532Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012219.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.3 Authorities and responsibilities.

County Supervisors and District Directors are responsible for servicing all Agency accounts serviced by the County and District Offices as prescribed by this subpart under the general guidance and supervision of District Directors and State Office personnel. Full use will be made of the County Office Management System in account servicing. For the purposes of this Subpart, all references to “County Supervisor” shall be construed to mean “District Director” for all loans serviced by the District Office.
#### Industrial Credit Company, Respondent, v. J. A. D. Construction Corp., Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, made on resettlement and dated September 13, 1966, modified by (1) striking out the provisions granting plaintiff partial summary judgment and (2) providing that plaintiff’s motion is denied in all respects. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. Appeal from order of said court, dated May 18, 1966, dismissed, without costs. That order was superseded by the later order of September 13, 1966. In our opinion, there are triable fact issues barring summary judgment. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
#### Phil W. Foster, appellant, v. Ward Perry et al., appellees.

Gen. No. 33,866.

Opinion filed January 27, 1930.

J. E. Beach and Wheaton Augur, for appellant. Campbell & Fischer, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
98-2012.

#### State ex rel. McGilvery v. Caltrider.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,

*1467IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### § 1726.13 Waivers.

The Administrator may waive, for good cause on a case by case basis, certain requirements and procedures of this part. RUS reserves the right, as a condition of providing loans, loan guarantees, or other assistance, to require any borrower to make any specification, contract, or contract amendment subject to the approval of the Administrator.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIndependent Orbiter Assessment (IOA): Assessment of the pyrotechnics subsystemThe results of the Independent Orbiter Assessment (IOA) of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Critical Items List (CIL) are presented. The IOA effort first completed an analysis of the Pyrotechnics (PYRO) hardware, generating draft failure modes and potential critical items. To preserve independence, this analysis was accomplished without reliance upon the results contained within the NASA FMEA/CIL documentation. The IOA results were then compared to the NASA FMEA/CIL baseline with proposed Post 51-L updates included. A resolution of each discrepancy from the comparison is provided through additional analysis as required. This report documents the results of that comparison for the Orbiter Pyrotechnics hardware.Document ID19900001630Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRobinson, W. M.*(McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 5, 1988Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-185531NAS 1.26:185531REPT-1.0-WP-VA88005-05Accession Number90N10946Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17650Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900001630.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Nicor Inc.
                                                        Nicor Gas Thrift Plan
                                                        Form 11-K
                                                        Exhibit 23.02






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-74402 of Nicor Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated June 13, 2003, on the
financial statements of the Nicor Gas Thrift Plan as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2001, included in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of Nicor
Companies Savings Investment Plan and Nicor Gas Thrift Plan for the year ended
December 31, 2002.







DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois

June 27, 2003
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0006192

26-AUG-2014

08:11 AM
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1987 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the amount of benefits 

payable for the burial and funeral expenses of certain veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2013 

Ms. SINEMA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

amount of benefits payable for the burial and funeral 

expenses of certain veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Dignity and 

5 Honor Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF BURIAL AND FUNERAL 

7 BENEFITS FOR VETERANS. 

8 (a) FUNERAL EXPENSES.—Section 2302(a) of title 

9 38, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘$300’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘$1918’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1987 IH

1 (b) PLOT ALLOWANCE.—Section 2303(b) of such 

2 title is amended by striking ‘‘$700’’ both places it appears 

3 and inserting ‘‘$1150’’. 

4 (c) DEATH FROM SERVICE-CONNECTED DIS5 ABILITY.—Section 2307 of such title is amended by strik6 ing ‘‘$2,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$6160’’. 

7 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply with respect to deaths occurring 

9 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         146,232
<SECURITIES>                                    12,790
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,410
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    339,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               641,370
<PP&E>                                       3,942,694
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,343,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,613,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          394,531
<BONDS>                                      1,179,410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,671
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,695,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,613,982
<SALES>                                      1,572,757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,627,992
<CGS>                                          800,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,065,810
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               353,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              77,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,915
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             72,933
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,933
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
Nicor Inc.
                                                   Birdsall, Inc. Retirement
                                                      Savings Plan
                                                   Form 11-K
                                                   Exhibit 23.01



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement No.
333-28579 of Nicor, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated June 18, 2003,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of Birdsall, Inc. Retirement
Savings Plan for the year ended December 31, 2002.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP

June 27, 2003
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.401 Objective.

This subpart sets forth the policies and procedures and delegates authority for providing Technical Assistance (TA) funds to eligible applicants to finance programs of technical and supervisory assistance for self-help housing, as authorized under section 523 of the Housing Act of 1949. Any processing or servicing activity conducted pursuant to this subpart involving authorized assistance to Rural Development employees, members of their families, known close relatives, or business or close personal associates, is subject to the provisions of subpart D of part 1900 of this chapter. Applicants for this assistance are required to identify any known relationship or association with a Rural Development employee. This financial assistance may pay part or all of the cost of developing, administering, or coordinating programs of technical and supervisory assistance to aid needy very low- and low-income families in carrying out self-help housing efforts in rural areas. Very low-income families must receive a priority for recruitment and participation and may not comprise less than the percentage stated in subpart L of part 1940 of this chapter of those assisted in any grant. The primary purpose is to fund organizations that are willing to locate and work with families that otherwise do not qualify as homeowners. Generally, these are families below 50 percent of median incomes, living in substandard housing, and/or lacking the skills to be good homeowners. Grantees will comply with the nondiscrimination regulation subpart E of part 1901 of this chapter which states that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, marital status, mental or physical handicap, or age, be excluded from participating in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination in connection with the use of grant funds and all provisions of the Fair Housing Act of 1988.

[55 FR 41833, Oct. 16, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 227, Jan. 5, 1993]
§ 1744.204 Rural development investments that do not meet the ratio requirements. ( a ) Each borrower is authorized to make investments other than qualified investments only in accordance with the provisions of the borrower's mortgage with RUS. Without RUS's approval, the portion of any investment of funds or commitment to invest funds for any rural development investment that will exceed the borrower's maximum investment ratio or cause the borrower to fall below the minimum total assets ratio, must comply with the provisions of the RUS mortgage.
( b ) RUS will consider, on a case-by-case basis, requests for approval of rural development investments not constituting qualified investments. RUS may condition such approval, if granted, on such requirements and restrictions as RUS may determine to be in the best interests of the Government, including, without limitation, the borrower's agreement to limit dividends or distributions of capital by an amount specified by RUS. Requests for such approvals must be submitted in writing to the relevant RUS regional office and shall include: ( 1 ) A description of the rural development project and the type of investment to be made, such as a loan, guarantee, stock purchase or equity investment;
( 2 ) A reasonable estimate of the amount the borrower is committed to provide to the rural development project including investments that may be required in the future; and
( 3 ) A pro forma balance sheet and cash flow statement for the period covering the borrower's future commitments to the rural development project.
( c ) In determining whether to approve a rural development investment that may cause the borrower to exceed the maximum investment ratio or to fall below the minimum total assets ratio in the future, RUS will consider annual increases to the borrower's net worth and total assets as might be reasonably anticipated from the borrower's normal operations.
**Exhibit 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Directed Electronics, Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Minarik, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                 /s/ James E. Minarik   James E. Minarik  Date: May 10, 2007 Chief Executive Officer
| **Consolidated Statements of Equity (Parenthetical) - $ / shares** | 6 Months Ended |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                   |           |   |
| Cash Dividends per share (in dollars per share)                    | $ 0.21         | $ 0.1 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends paid during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=27012166&loc=d3e187085-122770
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareCashPaid**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of American Tire Distributors Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his best knowledge:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2006 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                          |  | 
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 16, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ RICHARD P. JOHNSON
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Name: Richard P. Johnson                                
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer             
|                    |  |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ DAVID L. DYCKMAN  
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Name: David L. Dyckman                                  
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer