alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Phantom Pre

- flight Checklist

Version 1.0.1 of 18

-

Jan

- 2014

The following checklist is to be completed prior to each flight to ensure the safety of the pilot, bystanders,

property, and equipment.

Privacy Review

□ For aerial photography, pilot agrees to ethical photography practices:

o Permission has been granted to photograph people or they are in a public area with no expectation of privacy.

o No inappropriate or voyeuristic photograph y.

o No spying.

o Respect the privacy of others.

Flight Area Survey

□ Flight area not near major airport.

□ Flight area not near a helipad (i.e., hospital). If so, pilot has be given clearance by o perator or controller of the helipad.

□ Not near large crowds.

□ No flying over people not directly involved in the flight.

□ Permissions or authorization obtained by event or locale authorities.

□ Bystanders alerted to flight as appropriate.

□ Overhead obstacles such as trees, antennas, towers, and power lines have been identified.

□ UAS a ircraft could be located in the event of an un controlled or unexpected landing.

Weather Check

□ Wind s are at or below 12 mph (10 knots). Current wind speed: _________ Source of wind speed information:

__________________________ □ No rain or other precipitation.

□ Visibility at least 3 miles.

□ Forecast or direct observation indicates no significant weather change during flight.Before Inserting Battery in Aircraft

□ Transmitter batteries have been checked and are charged.

□ Propellers are tight and secured.

□ Aircraft battery is sufficiently charged for planned flight duration. Expected flight duration __________ minutes.

□ If performing aerial photography:

□ Camera battery is charged.

□ Memory card in place as required.

□ Camera settings appropriate for planned usage (stills or video).

□ Camera mount angle adjusted for expected altitude and posit ion relative to target.

□ Camera is securely mounted to aircraft.

□ Transmitter is turned on.

After Inserting Battery in Aircraft

□ Battery door shut, or battery locked in place

□ IMU reports warm

- up.

□ IMU does not report poor compass calibration (alternating red and yellow LED blinks).

□ IMU reports take

- off location recorded (6 rapid successive green LED blinks). NOTE: This is a critical flight safety item.

□ IMU reports six (6) or more satellite s for GPS lock (1 blinking green LED with control sticks centered).

Prior to Starting Motors

□ If performing aerial photography:

□ Camera is activated.

□ All persons are at least 15 feet away from aircraft.

Prior to Take

- off

□ Final check for clear take

- off area.

□ Start motors.

□ Throttle motors to take

- off speed.

Prior to Flight

□ Take off to low hover, less than 20 feet.

□ Check for aircraft stability.

□ Check for GPS lock, compass calibration.

□ Check for transmitter control of aircraft.

□ Begin flight.
#### § 1710.150 General.

The RE Act and prudent lending practice require that the Administrator make certain findings before approving an electric loan or loan guarantee. The borrower shall provide the evidence determined by the Administrator to be necessary to make these findings.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-41382

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff–Appellee, 

versus 

JAIME ADRIAN HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, 

Also Known as Jaime Adrian Amaro Hernandez-Hernandez, 

Defendant–Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:15-CR-1745-1 

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jaime Hernandez-Hernandez pleaded guilty of illegal reentry and was 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 2, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-41382 Document: 00513975635 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/02/2017
No. 16-41382

2 

sentenced to a 41-month term of imprisonment. On appeal, he renews his 

challenge to application of the eight-level aggravated-felony enhancement of 

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). The gravamen of his position is that, in light of 

Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), the definition of a crime of 

violence (“COV”) in 18 U.S.C, § 16(b) is unconstitutionally vague on its face. 

Therefore, he contends, his Texas conviction of evading arrest with a motor 

vehicle does not qualify as a COV under § 16(b) and thus is not an aggravated 

felony for purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F) and § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). 

Hernandez-Hernandez concedes that his argument is foreclosed by 

United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d 670, 672–77 (5th Cir. 2016) 

(en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16-6259), in which we 

rejected a constitutional challenge to § 16(b) as facially vague. Moreover, the 

Supreme Court recently decided Beckles v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 886, 890 

(2017), wherein it declined to extend Johnson and held that “the advisory 

Guidelines are not subject to vagueness challenges under the Due Process 

Clause.” 

In view of the foregoing, Hernandez-Hernandez’s unopposed motion for 

summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment is AFFIRMED. 

 Case: 16-41382 Document: 00513975635 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/02/2017
#### § 1777.30 Individual loans and grants—Making, processing, and servicing loans and grants.

Funding appropriated, designated, or otherwise approved to be delivered in accordance with the individual provisions of this part may be awarded directly to the individual(s) by this Agency or another designated Agency, such as United States Department of Agriculture's Rural Housing Service (RHS), or to the public water supply system and/or waste disposal facility for administration, including Tribes and Tribal organizations. When loan or grant funding is transferred to RHS, funding will be administered in accordance with subpart C of 7 CFR 3550 and other applicable provisions.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 176 

To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile service through 

the Lifeline program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile 

service through the Lifeline program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Taxpayer Funded 

5 Cell Phones Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIFELINE SUPPORT FOR COM7 MERCIAL MOBILE SERVICE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—A provider of commercial mobile 

9 service may not receive universal service support under 

10 sections 214(e) and 254 of the Communications Act of 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 176 IH

1 1934 (47 U.S.C. 214(e); 254) for the provision of such 

2 service through the Lifeline program of the Federal Com3 munications Commission. 

4 (b) COMMERCIAL MOBILE SERVICE DEFINED.—In 

5 this section, the term ‘‘commercial mobile service’’ has the 

6 meaning given such term in section 332(d)(1) of the Com7 munications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(d)(1)). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
#### §§ 1773.41-1773.44 [Reserved]
Official	Meeting	of	the

National	and	Governmental	Advisory	Committees	to	the	

U.S.	Representative	to	the	Commission	for	Environmental	Cooperation

April 10-11, 2014

U.S. EPA WJC South

1201 Constitution Ave. NW 

Washington, DC 20460

Tel: 202-564-2294 fax: 202-564-8129

3/26/14 - DRAFT

AGENDA

~EPA Conference Room 2138~

Thursday, April 10, 2014

9:00 am Registration

9:30 am Call to Order and Introductions

Oscar Carrillo, Designated Federal Officer, EPA

9:35 am Welcome and Overview of Agenda

Brian Houseal, Chair of the National Advisory Committee

Octaviana Trujillo, Chair of the Governmental Advisory Committee 

9:45 am Opening Remarks

Denise Sirmons, Director, Office of Diversity, Advisory Committee Management 

& Outreach, (ODACMO) EPA

10:00 am Update on U.S. Priorities & Guidance

(20th Anniversary, Council Session, U.S. Chairmanship & Strategic Plan)

Jane Nishida, Acting Assistant Administrator, International & Tribal Affairs, EPA (20 min)

 NAC/GAC Report-out on Communication & Outreach (10min) 

Question & Answer Period (30min)

11:00 am BREAK

11:15 am Update on Tribal Issues

JoAnn Chase, Director, American Indian Environmental Office, OITA 

Question & Answer Period

12:00pm Public Comments Period

12:30pm LUNCH
Thursday, April 10, 2014 Continued...

1:30 pm CEC Operational Plan Progress Report

Irasema Coronado, Executive Director, CEC Secretariat 

Question & Answer Period

2:30pm Update on White House State, Local, & Tribal Leaders Taskforce on 

Climate Preparedness and Resilience

Salud Carbajal, Member of White House Taskforce, California (30 min.) 

Question & Answer Period (30 min.)

3:30pm BREAK

3:45pm JPAC Report-out

Bob Varney, Chair, Joint Public Advisory Committee

Question & Answer Period

4:15 pm Summary & Next Steps Discussion

NAC/GAC Chairs

5:00 pm ADJOURN
Friday April 11, 2014

BUSINESS	MEETING:

8:30 am Registration

9:00 am Call to Order

Oscar Carrillo, Designated Federal Officer, EPA

9:05 am Plenary: Joint Committee Meeting 

Brian Houseal, Chair of the National Advisory Committee

Octaviana Trujillo, Chair of the Governmental Advisory Committee 

 Discussion of October meeting & July Council Session Dates

9:30 am Public Comment Period

9:45am Committees Meet Separately

GAC stays in “2138” Conference Room

NAC meets in “1132” Conference Room

12:45 pm LUNCH

1:45 pm Committees Reconvene in Plenary Session

Report-outs from NAC/GAC Chairs

3:00 pm ADJOURN
#### § 15b.11 Applicability.

This subpart applies to all programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance provided by the Department of Agriculture after the effective date of this part.

[47 FR 25470, June 11, 1982, as amended at 55 FR 52139, Dec. 19, 1990; 68 FR 51342, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### § 1726.26 Interest on overdue accounts.

Certain RUS contract forms contain a provision concerning payment of interest on overdue accounts. Prior to issuing the invitation to bidders, the borrower must insert an interest rate equal to the lowest “Prime Rate” listed in the “Money Rates” section of the Wall Street Journal on the date such invitation to bid is issued. If no prime rate is published on that date, the last such rate published prior to that date must be used. The rate must not, however, exceed the maximum rate allowed by any applicable state law.

[63 FR 58286, Oct. 30, 1998]
#### § 1776.1 Purpose.

This part sets forth the policies and procedures for Rural Utilities Service making grants to private nonprofit organizations for the purpose of providing loans and subgrants to eligible individuals for the construction, refurbishing, and servicing of individually owned household water well systems and individually owned decentralized wastewater systems in rural areas that are or will be owned by the eligible individuals.

[85 FR 23211, Apr. 27, 2020]
NLNK-20130405-8K-EX01






Exhibit 10.1
 
2013 Target Bonus Awards 
 
	
								
	 
	 
	2013
 Target
 Bonus
	 

	Name and Title
	 
	Percentage of 2013 Base Salary
	 
	 Total Target Bonus
	 

	Charles J. Link, Jr., M.D. 
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive and Scientific Officer
	 
	55%
	 
	$
	297,440
	

	 

	Nicholas N. Vahanian, M.D. 
President and Chief Medical Officer
	 
	45%
	 
	$
	189,000
	

	 

	Gordon H. Link, Jr.  
Chief Financial Officer
	 
	35%
	 
	$
	100,310
	

	 

	W. Jay Ramsey, M.D., Ph.D. 
Quality Assurance Officer
	 
	30%
	 
	$
	85,140
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.652 Policy. ( a ) The policy of RHS is to provide HPG's to grantees to operate a program which finances repair and rehabilitation activities to individual housing, rental properties, or co-ops for very low- and low-income persons. Individual housing that is owner occupied may qualify for replacement housing when it is determined by the grantee that the housing is not economically feasible for repair or rehabilitation. Grantees are expected to: ( 1 ) Coordinate and leverage funding for repair and rehabilitation activities, as well as replacement housing, with housing and community development organizations or activities operating in the same geographic area; and
( 2 ) Focus the program on rural areas and smaller communities so that it serves very low and low-income persons.
( b ) RHS intends to permit grantees considerable latitude in program design and administration. The forms or types of assistance must provide the greatest long-term benefit to the greatest number of persons residing in individual housing, rental properties, or co-ops needing repair and rehabilitation or replacement of individual housing.
( c ) Repairs and rehabilitation or replacement activities affecting properties on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places will be accomplished in a manner that supports national historic preservation objectives as specified in § 1944.673.
[62 FR 26208, May 13, 1997]
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

September 17, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00425

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.M., A.M., A.M., J.M., AND J.M.M

., From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 02128 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s final order terminating appellant’s parental rights. Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief and motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. See In re RR , No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 21157944 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio, May 21, 2003, order) (holding that Anders procedures apply to appeals from orders term inating parental rights), disp. on merits , 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio, Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.).

When counsel “cannot, in good faith, advance any arguable grounds of error,” counsel’s Anders brief must “contain a professional eval uation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.” High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)

. The brief must: refer the court to anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal; d iscuss the evidence adduced at trial; supply the court with ready references to the record; and supply the court with appropriate citations to legal authorities. Id. , at 812

- 13. The Anders brief must “demonstrate that counsel has conscientiously examined the record and determined that the appeal is so frivolous that the appellant is not entitled to counsel on appeal.” Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.).

The brief filed by appointed counsel on behalf of appellant C.M

. does not meet these requirements. Specifically, the brief does not discuss the evidence adduced at trial and it does not contain any legal analysis of anything in the record that might arguably support the appeal. In sum, the brief does not contain a pr ofessional evaluation of the record and does not demonstrate there are no arguable grounds for appeal.We therefore strike counsel’s Anders brief and order appellant’s brief redrawn. We order the redrawn brief due October 2, 2015

. We further order counse l to notify appellant that the Anders brief has been stricken and there is no current deadline for filing a pro se brief.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of September, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Office of Justice Programs

          - [OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1526]

# AGENCY:

National Institute of Justice.

# ACTION:

Notice of Draft NIJ Law Enforcement Duty Holster Selection and Application Guide.

# SUMMARY:

                        In an effort to obtain comments from interested parties, the                               ( print page 69459)                            U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice (NIJ) will make available to the general public the draft “NIJ Law Enforcement Duty Holster Selection and Application Guide.” The opportunity to provide comments on this document is open to industry technical representatives, law enforcement agencies and organizations, research, development and scientific communities, and all other stakeholders and interested parties. Those individuals wishing to obtain and provide comments on the draft document under consideration are directed to the following Web site:                         *http://www.justnet.org.*

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before December 13, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Vanessa Castellanos, by telephone at 202-514-5272 [                        **Note:**                         This is not a toll-free telephone number], or by e-mail at                         *vanessa.castellanos@usdoj.gov.*

John H. Laub,

Director, National Institute of Justice.

[FR Doc. 2010-28431 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
#### SCHROEDER, Respondent, v. MEYER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by George J. Schroeder against Elder Meyer.

'PEB CUBIAM.

Motion granted and order resettled by inserting a recital that the appeal was argued before five justices of this court, and the decision concurred in by four; the remaining justice„having, prior to the decision, been appointed a member of the Court of Appeals. See Town of North Hempstead v. El*1142dridge (decided by this court March 2, 1906), 98 N. Y. Supp. 157.
§ 1778.10 Restrictions on use of grant funds. ( a ) Grant funds may not be used to: ( 1 ) Assist any city or town with a population in excess of 10,000 inhabitants. The population figure is obtained from the most recent decennial Census. If the applicable population figure cannot be obtained from the most recent decennial Census, RD will determine the applicable population figure based on available population data. Facilities financed by RUS may be located in non-rural areas. However, loan and grant funds may be used to finance only that portion of the facility serving rural areas, regardless of facility location.
( 2 ) Assist a rural area that has a median household income in excess of the statewide nonmetropolitan median household income as determined by 5-year income data from the American Community Survey (ACS) or, if needed, other Census Bureau data. If there is reason to believe that the ACS or other Census Bureau data does not accurately represent the median household income of the rural area, the reasons will be documented and the applicant may furnish, or RD may obtain, additional information regarding such median household income data. Information must consist of reliable data from local, regional, State or Federal sources or from a survey conducted by a reliable impartial source.
( 3 ) Finance facilities which are not modest in size, design, cost, and are not directly related to correcting the potable water quantity or quality problem.
( 4 ) Pay loan or grant finder's fees.
( 5 ) Pay any annual recurring costs that are considered to be operational expenses.
( 6 ) Pay rental for the use of equipment or machinery owned by the rural community.
( 7 ) Purchase existing systems.
( 8 ) Refinance existing indebtedness, except for short-term debt incurred in accordance with § 1778.9(h).
( 9 ) Make reimbursement for projects developed with other grant funds.
( 10 ) Finance facilities that are not for public use.
( b ) Nothing in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall preclude rural areas from submitting joint proposals for assistance under this part. Each entity applying for financial assistance under this part to fund their share of a joint project will be considered individually.
[68 FR 46078, Aug. 5, 2003, as amended at 80 FR 9863, Feb. 24, 2015]
#### SMITH, Appellant, v. ERWIN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by Arnold E. Smith, as trustee of the estate of Cyrus W. Erwin, a bankrupt, against Cyrus W. Erwin and Emma E. Erwin.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### § 1783.4 [Reserved]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1923 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the eligibility 

of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for designation for 

participation in the visa waiver program for certain visitors to the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2013 

Mr. AMODEI (for himself, Ms. CHU, Ms. TITUS, Mr. HECK of Nevada, Mr. 

HORSFORD, Mr. GRIMM, Ms. GABBARD, Mr. SCHOCK, and Mrs. NAPOLITANO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

for the eligibility of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for designation for participation in the visa 

waiver program for certain visitors to the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1923 IH

1 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMIN2 ISTRATIVE REGION FOR DESIGNATION FOR 

3 PARTICIPATION IN VISA WAIVER PROGRAM 

4 FOR CERTAIN VISITORS TO THE UNITED 

5 STATES. 

6 Section 217(c) of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(c)) is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(12) ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN REGION FOR

10 DESIGNATION AS PROGRAM COUNTRY.—The Hong 

11 Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s 

12 Republic of China— 

13 ‘‘(A) shall be eligible for designation as a 

14 program country for purposes of this sub15 section; and 

16 ‘‘(B) may be designated as a program 

17 country for purposes of this subsection if such 

18 region meets requirements applicable for such 

19 designation in this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS