alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
TERRANCE LEE KING , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 2 3

- 015 6 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2018

- 127326

- 001 The Honorable Geoffrey H. Fish , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , P hoenix By Robert E. Prather Counsel for Respondent Terrance Lee King, San Luis Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge David D. Weinzweig , Judge Michael S. Catlett , and Judge Maria Elena Cruz delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 11-02-2023STATE v. KING Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Terrance Lee King seeks review of the superior court’s order denying h is petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is petitioner’s second successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
#### § 1786.56 Approval of applications.

The applications will ordinarily be reviewed and, if satisfactory, approved, and closing schedule based on the order in which executed prepayment agreements are received. The Administrator may limit the number of applications approved and closings scheduled from time to time taking into account, among other matters, the financial interests and administrative considerations of the Government.
#### Baptist Hardy, executor of the last will and testament of Zuleika Hardy, deceased et al., appellants, v. Clement v. Hardy et al., appellees.

Gen. No. 8,255.

Opinion filed January 24, 1929.

O’Harra, O’Harra *&*O’Harra, for appellants. Charles J. Scofield, *pro se,*and Earl N. Bell, for certain appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 31.1

I, Lloyd U. Noland, III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Noland Company.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 5, 2004

Lloyd U. Noland, III

Lloyd U. Noland, III	

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual Report of NL  Industries,  Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harold C. Simmons, Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  and I, Gregory M. Swalwell,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Harold C. Simmons
----------------------
Harold C. Simmons
 Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Gregory M. Swalwell
------------------------
Gregory M. Swalwell
 Chief Financial Officer


March 8, 2004


Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 ofchapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as anofficer of Bidz.com, Inc. (“Bidz.com”), that, to his knowledge, theQuarterly Report of Bidz.com on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of Bidz.com.

 
| Date:  August 9,  2010 | By     | /s/  David Zinberg       |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                                  |   | David  Zinberg           |
|                                  |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                                  |   |                     |
| Date:  August 9,  2010 | By     | /s/  Lawrence Kong       |
|                                  |   | Lawrence  Kong           |
|                                  |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
August 3, 1979.

M. P. No. 78-401.

#### In re: Petition of Rhode Island Broadcasters Association.

The Rhode Island Broadcasters Association (the Association) filed this petition on November 9,1978, asking that we modify our Provisional Order No. 11, which sets forth temporary guidelines for members of the *876Rhode Island Bar who elect to advertise their services. Specifically, the Association asks that we remove the ban against advertising on radio and television in light of certain constitutional predicates.1

*Edwards & Angell, James J. Skeffington, George W. Shuster, William P. Robinson III,*for petitioner. *Letts, Quinn 6- Licht, Daniel J. Murray, Richard A. Licht,*for respondent.

The petitioner, in mounting its constitutional attack, raises substantial questions. Rather than rest our conclusion on the validity of the petitioner’s claim of violations of its first-amendment and equal-protection guarantees, we believe, after much reflection, that the use of the electronic media by attorneys seeking to advertise their services should be regulated, not proscribed.

Accordingly, the petition to modify is granted, and the attorneys for the petitioner are directed to submit to this court and the attorneys representing the Rhode Island Bar Association, within 20 days of the issuance of this order, copies of the proposed draft of the modified rule. The Bar Association shall deliver its comments on the draft to us within 10 days following its receipt of the draft.

1

Provisional Order No. 11 provides, in relevant part, that “[advertisements should be placed only in newspapers, periodicals and the yellow pages of telephone directories” and that “[n]o advertising should be conducted on radio or television.”
#### §§ 1734.38-1734.39 [Reserved]
MEDIATION REFERRALS

2006-0267.

#### Roth, Blair, Roberts, Strasfeld & Lodge v. Wilkins.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-M-1092.

The following cases have been referred to mediation pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 5, 2020

a0129

Order 

Clerk

February 5, 2020

160213

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160213

COA: 348612

Muskegon CC: 17-006190-FH;

PHILIP CHARLES SWIFT, 17-006389-FC; 17-006390-FH

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 15, 2019 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE defendant’s sentence and REMAND this case to 

the Muskegon Circuit Court. Offense Variable 4 appears to have been scored based 

solely on the prosecutor’s assertion. However, an attorney’s statements are not evidence, 

People v Ison, 132 Mich App 61, 68 (1984), and offense variables must be scored based 

on a preponderance of the evidence, People v Hardy, 494 Mich 430, 438 (2013). 

Because a 10-point reduction for Offense Variable 4 would result in a lower sentencing 

range, defendant is entitled to resentencing. People v Francisco, 474 Mich 82 (2006). 

We do not retain jurisdiction.
#### § 1786.152 Prepayments of RUS loans.

An electric loan made under the RE Act shall not be sold or prepaid at a value that is less than the outstanding principal balance, except that, on request of a borrower, an electric loan made under the RE Act, or a portion of such a loan, that was advanced before May 1, 1992, or has been advanced for not less than 2 years, shall be prepaid by the borrower at the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the loan or the discounted present value thereof.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Back to School Resources      

# Resource: Back to School Resources

This infographic presents common elements that schools should consider in creating and sustaining a safe learning environment. These span from planning and prevention activities to protection and mitigation measures to response and recovery actions during and after an actual incident. **Learn more.**
#### §§ 1789.164-1789.165 [Reserved]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated August 13, 2010, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on                           ( print page 69462)                        September 1, 2010 (75 FR 53719), Noramco Inc., 1440 Olympic Drive, Athens, Georgia 30601, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Poppy Straw Concentrate (9670), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.                

The company plans to import the listed controlled substance in bulk to manufacture other controlled substances solely in bulk for distribution to the company's customers.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the registration of Noramco Inc. to import the basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest, and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. DEA has investigated Noramco Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

Dated: November 1, 2010.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010-28513 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Exhibit 32-1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Navigators Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley A. Galanski, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/STANLEY A. GALANSKIStanley A. Galanski
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 22, 2007 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---
##### 



Exhibit 10.67
 Amendment No. 1 to
OEM Supply and Purchase Agreement
     1. Prices
  2. CSI Product Changes
   3. Out of warranty service




---



##### 



4. Spare Parts
   5. Forecast
  6. Acceptance upon shipment
   7. Non-conforming Products




---



##### 



8. Product and Battery Warranty
 9. Addition of AED models 9131, 9231 and substitute models for discontinuation
Products




---



##### 



Cardiac Science Inc.
    
    Ninon Kohden CorporationSignature:
    
    /s/ Raymond W. Cohen
    
    Signature:
    
    /s/ Kohei OnoName:
    
    Raymond W. Cohen
    
    Name:
    
    Kohei OnoTitle:
    
    Chairman & CEO
    
    Title
    
    Corporate DirectorGeneral ManagerEngineering OperationsDate: 3/16/2005
    
    Date: 3/16/2005




---



##### 



APPENDIX 2
 (Revised per Amendment No.1)
   Nihon Kohden branded Product
    
    Transfer PriceAED model 9100G-299 (includes
display) G3 platform with
display with 5 years shelf
life battery
    
    
    [*]AED model 9200G (includes display) biphasic G3 platform with
display with 5 years shelf life battery
    
    
    [*]AED model 9131G3 standard version with 5 years shelf life battery
    
    
    [*]AED model 9231
    
    
    [*]G3 standard version biphasic with 5 years shelf life battery
    
    
    [*]NK branded AED Electrodes
    
    
    [*]USB to RS-232 Plug in Adaptor
    
    
    [*]All prices are in US Dollars (USD). Any quantity can be ordered
    
    
    [*]
 AED Products package includes:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1925

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1925 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1925.1 General.

This Instruction applies to borrowers with Rural Rental Housing (RRH), Rural Cooperative Housing (RCH), Labor Housing (LH),and Non-Program (NP) loans secured by real estate. It also applies to section 502 and section 504 Rural Housing borrowers (Single Family Housing (SFH)) who also have a Farmer Program loan. It does not apply to borrowers who have a SFH loan only; those will be serviced under 7 CFR part 3550. Borrowers are responsible for paying taxes on the real estate security to the proper taxing authorities before taxes become delinquent. This obligation is set forth in the security instrument securing the loan. This subpart is inapplicable to Farm Service Agency, Farm Loan Programs.

[57 FR 36590, Aug. 14, 1992, as amended at 67 FR 78327, Dec. 24, 2002; 72 FR 64122, Nov. 15, 2007]
#### BURNETT et al., Respondents, v. SCHMITZ, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

Action by George B. Burnett and another against Frederick Schmitz. T. Hansen, for appellant. M. 5. Guiterman, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.255 Nondiscrimination.

All loan servicing actions described in this subpart will be conducted without regard to race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, age, or physical or mental handicap.
EXHIBIT 23.1





                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the:

      (i)   Registration Statement No. 2-98713 on Form S-8 and related
            Prospectus with respect to the 1985 Long Term Performance Incentive
            Plan of NL Industries, Inc.; and

      (ii)  Registration   Statement  No.  33-25913  on  Form  S-8  and  related
            Prospectus  with  respect to the Savings  Plan for  Employees  of NL
            Industries, Inc.; and

      (iii) Registration Statement No. 333-65817 on Form S-8 and related
            Prospectus with respect to the NL Industries, Inc. 1998 Long-Term
            Incentive Plan; and

      (iv)  Registration Statement No. 33-48145 on Form S-8 and related
            Prospectus with respect to the NL Industries, Inc. 1992 Non-Employee
            Directors Stock Option Plan.

of our report dated February 10, 1999,  which includes an explanatory  paragraph
for the  1997  change  in  accounting  for  environmental  remediation  costs in
accordance  with Statement of Position  96-1, on our audits of the  consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedules of NL Industries, Inc. as
of  December  31,  1997 and 1998,  and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1998,  which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.





                                    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Houston, Texas
March 22, 1999
<PAGE>


The significant subsidiaries of New Skies Satellites N.V. as of December 31,
2003 were:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME                                            LOCATION                            % OWNERSHIP
----------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------   -------------------
<S>                                             <C>                                        <C>
New Skies Networks, Inc.                        Delaware, U.S.A                            100%
New Skies Satellites, Inc.                      Delaware, U.S.A                            100%
New Skies Satellites Asset Holding, Inc.        Delaware, U.S.A                            100%
New Skies Networks Pty Ltd.                     New South Wales, Australia                 100%
New Skies Networks (UK) Ltd.                    London, United Kingdom                     100%
New Skies Satellites (UK) Ltd.                  London, United Kingdom                     100%
New Skies Satellites MAR B.V.                   The Hague, The Netherlands                 100%
New Skies Satellites Kazakhstan B.V.            The Hague, The Netherlands                 100%
New Skies Satellites Argentina B.V.             The Hague, The Netherlands                 100%
New Skies Satellites Singapore B.V.             The Hague, The Netherlands                 100%
New Skies Satellites India B.V.                 The Hague, The Netherlands                 100%
New Skies Satellites Brazil Ltda.               Sao Paulo, Brazil                          100%
</TABLE>