alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
​

| ​ |
|---------|

​

​

NL INDUSTRIES ANNOUNCES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND

FOR THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2023 AT $.07 PER SHARE

​

​

DALLAS, TEXAS – August 2, 2023 –  NL Industries, Inc. (NYSE: NL) today announced that its board of directors has declared a quarterly dividend of seven cents ($0.07) per share on its common stock, payable on September 19, 2023 to shareholders of record at the close of business on September 1, 2023.  

​

NL Industries, Inc. is engaged in the component products (security products and recreational marine components) and chemicals (TiO2) businesses.

​

​

​

* * * * *

​

**Investor Relations Contact**

​

Bryan A. Hanley

Senior Vice President and Treasurer

Tel. 972-233-1700

----
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vermont Pure Holdings,
Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended October 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best
knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ Bruce S. MacDonald
-------------------------------------
Bruce S. MacDonald
Chief Financial Officer

Date: January 30, 2005
2/11/05 Final INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Case Number: P050186 Assessor: Delpire ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Manufacturing Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:

Consumer use expected? No, consumer use is not expected.INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P050186INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER: P050186INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P050186INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P050186INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Num ber: P050186 Assessor: Delpire ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 2 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Processing Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P050186INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER: P050186INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P050186INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Num ber: P050186 Assessor: Delpire ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES Scenario#: 3 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: Use Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE Total Releases: (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) Release Days/yr: Per Site Release: (kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day) Remarks:INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P050186INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER: P050186INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P050186INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT CASE NUMBER:P050186
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i.) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii.) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Bertrand F. Cambou               
|                  |  |  |  | Bertrand F. Cambou                   
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 23


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports included in this Form 10-K/A, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements File Nos. 033-21995,033-29317,033-62867, 033-62865, 
033-62877, 033-62879, 033-62881, 033-62883, 333-03643, 333-18477 and 333-21927.




/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
 April 30, 1997
Exhibit 32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Maidenform Brands, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended July 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher W.
Vieth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Christopher W. ViethChristopher
      W. ViethExecutive
      Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief
  FinancialOfficer(principal
      financial officer)





August
11, 2010





This certification shall not be
deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis of a six-component, flow-through, strain-gage, force balance used for hypersonic wind tunnel models with scramjet exhaust flow simulationThe thermal effects of simulant gas injection and aerodynamic heating at the model's surface on the measurements of a non-watercooled, flow through balance were investigated. A stainless steel model of a hypersonic air breathing propulsion cruise missile concept (HAPCM-50) was used to evaluate this balance. The tests were conducted in the 20-inch Mach 6 wind tunnel at NASA-Langley. The balance thermal effects were evaluated at freestream Reynolds numbers ranging from .5 to 7 x 10(exp 6) ft and angles of attack between -3.5 to 5 deg at Mach 6. The injection gases considered included cold air, hot air, and a mixture of 50 percent Argon and 50 percent Freon-12. The stagnation temperatures of the cold air, hot air, and Ar-Fr(12) reached 111, 214, and 283 F, respectively within the balance. A bakelite sleeve was inserted into the inner tube of the balance to minimize the thermal effects of these injection gases. Throughout the tests, the normal force, side force, yaw moment, roll moment, and pitching moment balance measurements were unaffected by the balance thermal effects of the injection gases and the wind tunnel flow. However, the axial force (AF) measurement was significantly affected by balance heating. The average zero shifts in the AF measurements were 1.9, 3.8, and 5.9 percent for cold air, hot air, and Ar-Fr(12) injection, respectively. The AF measurements decreased throughout these tests which lasted from 70 to 110 seconds. During the cold air injection tests, the AF measurements were accurate up to at least ten seconds after the model was injected into the wind tunnel test section. For the hot air and Ar-Fr(12) tests, the AF measurements were accurate up to at least five seconds after model injection.Document ID19900012459Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeThesis/DissertationAuthorsKniskern, Marc W.*(North Carolina State Univ. Raleigh, NC, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186585NAS 1.26:186585Accession Number90N21775Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC1-129Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900012459.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i.) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii.) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2007 |  | /s/ Bertrand F. Cambou               
|                       |  | Bertrand F. Cambou                   
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT (23)









Independent Auditors Consent and Report on Schedules





The Board of Directors

Harleysville Group Inc.:



The audits referred to in our report dated February 13, 2004 included the related financial statement schedules as of December 31, 2003, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, included in the annual report on Form 10-K.  These financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statement schedules based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-03127, 33-84348, 33-91726, 333-85941, 333-37386, 333-37212) on Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 333-104437, 33-78372, 33-90810) on Form S-3 of Harleysville Group Inc. of our report dated February 13, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Harleysville Group as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, and all related financial statement schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Harleysville Group Inc., and of our report dated March 11, 2004 with respect to the statements of financial condition of the Harleysville Group Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of income and changes in plan equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the Harleysville Group Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan annual report on Form 11-K.





/s/ KPMG LLP





Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 11, 2004
#### §§ 1784.24-1784.25 [Reserved]
Ja~jEA TFS. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 2 

290 BROADWAY 

NEW YORK, NY 10007-1866 

+T", PROS"G 

JUN - 4 2009 

Mr. Mark N. Mauriello, Commissioner 

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection 

P.O. Box 402 

Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0402 

Dear Commissioner Mauriello: 

On April 21, 2009, we received your request to amend New Jersey's State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) for ozone. The revision involves New Jersey's recently adopted rules for Reasonably 

Available Control Technology (RACT) requirements and providing other SIP emission reduction 

measures for fourteen (14) source categories, as well as related changes to other rules . The 

specific rules are Subchapter 19, "Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution from Oxides of 

Nitrogen (NOx)," Subchapter 16, "Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution by Volatile Organic 

Compounds," Subchapter 4, "Control and Prohibition of Particles from Combustion of Fuel," 

Subchapter 10, "Sulfur in Solid Fuels," Subchapter 21, "Emission Statements," and Subchapter 

8, "Permits and Certificates for Minor Facilities (and Major Facilities Without an Operating 

Permit)." 

We have determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and are 

reviewing it to prepare a notice of Proposed Rulemaking. In addition, we request that your staff 

forward copies of the codified versions of each amended rule as soon as they become available. 

We appreciate the great effort it took to get these important rules adopted and I believe they will 

go a long way to help protect the public health and the environment . 

Sincerely, 

Ronaljl'J. Borsellino, Acting Director 

Di~.ision of Environmental Planning and Protection 

cc: W. O'Sullivan, NJDEP 

C. Salmi, NJDEP 

Internet Address (URL) " http ://www .epa .gov 

Recycled/Recyclable " Printed with Vegetable ON Based inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
#### McGill’s Administrator *vs.*Burnett.

Case 189.

Error fo hi-Bourbon Circuit; French, Judge.

*Contract to procure remission of a forfeiture -is illegal.*

November 1.

Gontrrct to paya person *641^ management or a petition mission of a forfeiture, *provided he** *remission 6 of it,*will not enforced, contracts'1011 tend to obstruct a cor. Nation oMhe government

*640Judge Underwood

delivered th« opinion of the court.

The plaintiffs intestate agreed to pay Burnett 100 dollars, in property, “ in consideration of his services and laoor to be performed in and *641about the management of a petition to the Govern- or, in case a certain forfeiture (described in the contract) was remitted by him.”

*Talbot*and *G.*Davis, for plaintiff; Denny, for defendant.

The declaration, upon its face, fully sets out the agreement, and we are of opinion that the court, upon the demurrer to the pleas, should have given judgment against the declaration, because the con tract is such that no recovery cap be permitted upon if. The contract is in effect to pay the plaintiff for his management, whether fair or foul, in inducing the governor to remit a forfeiture. Such contracts tend to obstruct a correct administration of the government. He who labors for the reward promised, will be induced to use his influence for the money he is to obtain ; when, as a patriot and a citizen, he should only act for the good of his country, and under an impartial sense of justice, tempered with mercy. We can readily imagine the dangers likely to result from the corrupt artifices of mercenary managers in procuring pardons and remissions.

Such contracts are denounced by most if not all the elementary writers on contracts as illegal and against public policy. We think the language of Lord Eldon, to be found in II Comyns on Contracts, 127, applicable to this case.

Wherefore, the judgment’is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for judgment upon the demurrer against the declaration.
Editorial Note on Part 1924
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1924 appear at 80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1924.12 Warranty of development work. ( a ) Form RD 1924-19, “Builder's Warranty,” or an insured 10-year home warranty as described in exhibit L of this subpart, and normal trade warranties on items of equipment will be issued to the borrower at the completion of new building construction, dwelling rehabilitation by the contract method, all cases of newly completed and previously unoccupied dwellings or construction under conditional commitments issued to builders and sellers.
( b ) If the warranty is not an insured 10-year warranty, a completed Form RD 1924-19, with warranty protection for 1 year, must be provided by the builder upon final acceptance of the work by the owner and the Agency. If an insured 10-year warranty is provided, the requirements of exhibit L of this subpart apply, and a copy of the warranty insurance policy or a binder must have been received by the Agency prior to disbursement of the final payment to the builder.
( c ) If, for some reason, the warranty insurance policy cannot be issued, the contractor will be required to execute Form RD 1924-19 and the case will be forwarded to the State Director for consideration of debarment under the provisions of subpart M of part 1940 (available in any Agency office). The County Supervisor will assist the borrower to the extent necessary under the provisions of the warranty and subpart F of part 1924 of this chapter.
( d ) The County Supervisor will take the following action prior to the expiration of the first year of the warranty period: ( 1 ) As soon as the warranty has been executed, the follow-up date for sending Form RD 1924-21, “Notice of Expiration of First Year of Warranty,” which will be used for the 1 year warranty or the first year of the insured 10-year warranty, will be posted to the “Servicing and Supervision” section of the Management System card.
( 2 ) Form RD 1924-21 is provided for use in notifying the borrower of the expiration date of the first year of the warranty. This letter will be mailed to the borrower early in the second month preceding the expiration date of the first year of the warranty period.
( 3 ) If the County Supervisor or District Director does not hear from the borrower within 30 days, it can reasonably be assumed that no complaint exists or that any complaint has been satisfied unless information to the contrary has been received.
( 4 ) If the borrower notifies the Agency that any complaint has not been satisfied, an onsite inspection shall be made as early as possible, but not later than 1 month preceding the expiration date of the first year of the warranty. The results of the inspection will be recorded on Form RD 1924-12. If the borrower has complaints, the case should be handled in accordance with the provisions of subpart F of part 1924 of this chapter, or as otherwise provided in this subpart.
[52 FR 8002, Mar. 13, 1987, as amended at 54 FR 14334, Apr. 11, 1989]
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D 20 2 3

- 0691 Lower Tribunal No. C F19

- 0 1 0 147

- XX

_____________________________
A SHLEY S COTT G UY , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County

.

Dennis P. Maloney , Judge.

July 9, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.
NARDELLA
, WOZNIAK and WHITE , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig , II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
#### § 1778.37 Forms, Instructions and Bulletins.

Bulletins, instructions and forms referenced are for use in administering grants made under this part and are available from any USDA/Rural Development office or the Rural Utilities Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250-1500.
§ 1570.20 Criteria. The criteria considered by FAS in reviewing proposals for SOAP and COAP initiatives will include, but not be limited to, the following: ( a ) The expected contribution which initiatives will make toward realizing U.S. agricultural export goals and, in particular, in developing, expanding, or maintaining markets for U.S. sunflowerseed and/or cottonseed oil;
( b ) The subsidy requirements of proposed initiatives in relation to the sums made available to operate the programs in any given fiscal year; and
( c ) The likelihood that sales facilitated by initiatives would have the unintended effect of displacing normal commercial sales of sunflowerseed and/or cottonseed oil.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7622
DAVID KEITH SUMRELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-304-2) Submitted: January 31, 2002 Decided: February 8, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Keith Sumrell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David Keith Sumrell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sumrell v. Virginia , No. CA-01-304-2 (E.D. Va. July 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Brown, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on November 17, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 378; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Fein, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.