T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J AME S P . C AMP B E L L ; C HE R I A. STA D TLA N D ER, P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. I N D Y M A C M O R T G A G E S E R V I C E S , a d i v i s i o n o f

O n e W e s tBa n k , FSB; M O R T G A G E E L E C T R O N IC REG I STRA TI O N SERV I CES, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 35826 D . C. N o . 2 : 1 1 - c v - 0 0 8 6 7 - RSL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R obe rtS . L a s ni k, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 16, 2013 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , IK U T A , an dW A T F O R D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jam es P . C am pb el l and C heri A . S t adt l ander appealpro se f rom the di stri ct 

# FI LED APR23 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 35826 2 court ’ s j ud gm entdi sm i ss i ng thei r a ct i on al l egi ng vi ol at i on s of the R ac ket ee r I n f lu e n c e da n dC o rru p t O r g a n iz a tio n s A c t ( “R I C O ” ) in c o n n e c tio n w ith f o r e c lo s u r e p r o c e e d in g s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e vi e w de novo adi s m i s s a l f orf a i l ur e t o s t a t e ac l a i m a nd f ora n abus e of d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f

le a v e to a m e n d . C erva n tes v. C o u n tryw i de H o m e L o a n s, Inc. , 656 F . 3d 1034, 1040- 41 ( 9th C i r . 2011) . W e m a ya f f i rm on a nygr ound s u p p o rte db yth e r e c o r d , T hom ps on v . P aul , 54 7 F . 3d 10 55 , 10 58 -59 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ) , a n dw e a f

f i rm. D i sm i ssal o f C am p b el l ’ s an dS t ad t l an d er’ s R IC O cl ai m s w as p ro p er b ecau se the s pe c i f

i c a l l e ga t i ons i n the i rc om pl a i ntdi d nots e tf orth f a c t s de m ons tr a t i ng the r e q u is ite p a tte rn o f

r a c k e te e r in g a c tiv ityin v o lv in g m o r e th a n o n e tr a n s a c tio n , se e Se v e rv . A las ka P ul

p C or p. , 97 8 F . 2d 15 29 , 15 35 (9th C i r. 19 92 ) ( patt ern requi re s m ore than o ne sc hem e w i th a “ si ng l e purpo se w hi ch happ en[s ] t o i nv ol ve m ore than o ne ac tt aken t o achi eve thatpu rpose” ), and thei r r em ai ni ng concl usory a lle g a tio n s f

a ile dto a lle g e f

r au dw ith th e r e q u ir e dp a rtic u la r ity , se e Fe d . R. Ci v . P. 9(b) (a l l egat i on s of f

raud m ustbe “ st at e[ d] w i th p art i cul ar i ty” ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on byde ny i ng l e a ve t o a m e nd the c o m p la in t to a d dR e g io n a l T ru s te e S e rv ic e s C o rp o r a tio n a s ad e f e n d a n t. See C ervantes , 6 5 6 F .3 da t 1 0 4 1 ( “A lth o u g h le a v e to a m e n ds h o u ldb e g iv e n f r e e ly , a11- 35826 3 d is tr ic t c o u rt m a yd is m is s w ith o u t le a v e w h e r e ap la in tif f’s p r o p o s e da m e n d m e n ts w ou l d fai l t o cure the pl ea di ng defi ci enci es and am endm entw ou l d b e f ut i l e. ”) . AF F I RME D.