alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 196 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 196

To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2013

    Mr. Latta (for himself, Mrs. Black, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Miller of 
    Florida, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Lance, Mr. Nugent, Mr. Wittman, Mr. 
 Marchant, and Mr. Loebsack) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 
 the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31(2)) is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 601(a)(1) of such Act is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a)(1)'' and inserting ``(a)'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
            (3) by striking ``, as adjusted by paragraph (2) of this 
        subsection''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
****The ****EOWSCommunity Training Series Schedule****
home

| Weed and Seed is excited to offerthe �EOWS Community Training Broadcast Series� -  a series of one-hourlong satellite broadcasts down-linked from LETN�s production facility,Primedia Workplace Learning in Dallas, Texas.  The broadcasts cover a range of topics of interest to Weed and Seed sites and communitiesacross the country.  Tapes of previous broadcasts are available toWeed and Seed sites at no charge. Requesttapes for your site.        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**SEPTEMBER16, 1999*Schools: Danger Zone/SafetyZone?*NOVEMBER18, 1999*Communities of the New Millennium:Sharing Success*FEBRUARY17, 2000 *Domestic Abuse and Family Violence* **Recipientof the 1999 Telly Award!!** APRIL20, 2000*Community Policing: Experts SpeakOut*JUNE 29,2000*Moving Beyond the Prison Gates*  November 30, 2000Environmental Justice and Weed and Seed**
Frequently AskedQuestions
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: August 27, 2015 D-60-15 

___________________________________

In the Matter of RICHARD P.

URDA, an Attorney.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STANDARDS, ON MOTION

Petitioner;

RICHARD P. URDA,

Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 2209062)

___________________________________

Calendar Date: August 10, 2015

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,

Albany (Michael K. Creaser of counsel), for petitioner.

Richard P. Urda, Ithaca, respondent pro se.

__________

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1988. 

He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of

Ithaca, Tompkins County.

By decision dated October 25, 2012, this Court suspended

respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year,

which suspension was conditionally stayed (99 AD3d 1165 [2012]). 

Respondent now moves for termination of the stayed suspension and

he has provided a supporting affidavit indicating that the

conditions of the stay have been fully complied with. Petitioner
-2- D-60-15 

does not oppose the motion, which we now grant.

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted, and the stayed

suspension imposed by this Court's decision dated October 25,

2012 is terminated, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
§ 1786.54 Eligibility criteria. To be eligible to prepay RUS Notes at the Discounted Present Value a borrower must comply with the following criteria: ( a ) The borrower must be current on all payments due on its outstanding RUS Notes and all other payment obligations owed to RUS and the Rural Telephone Bank.
( b ) The borrower must agree to prepay all of its outstanding RUS Notes.
( c ) The borrower must identify the source of private financing that will be used to refinance its outstanding RUS Notes, which financing may not include obligations the income of which is exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
( d ) The borrower must have expended all funds advanced on account of the RUS Notes for the purposes for which such funds were advanced.
( e ) The borrower must agree to a rescission of the unadvanced balance of the RUS Notes.
( f ) The borrower must agree that the borrower, its successors or assigns, shall pay to the Government, as a condition of receiving additional loans or loan guarantees pursuant to Titles I, II and III of the Act, an amount equal to the aggregate of the difference with respect to each of the RUS Notes between the amount outstanding on the RUS Note and the Discounted Present Value of the RUS Note upon prepayment with interest accruing quarterly; the interest rates shall be the rates provided in the respective RUS Notes.
( g ) If the borrower is a party to a wholesale power contract with a power supplier financed pursuant to the Act, the borrower must provide the Administrator with such assurances as the Administrator may request that it will meet its obligations to the power supplier.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Paul A. Kruger, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K/A of Boundless Motor Sports Racing, Inc. 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresas of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.   Date:March 2, 2005 /s/ Paul A. Kruger   Paul A. Kruger, Chairman of the Board Chief Executive Officer and President
#### In the Matter of Nyack Hospital, as Attorney-in-Fact for Albert Izzo, Respondent, v Noah Weinberg, as Commissioner of the Rockland County Department of Social Services, Respondent, and Carmen Shang, as Acting Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the State of New York, Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State Commissioner of Social Services, dated June 15, 1977 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency denying in part petitioner’s application for medical assistance, the State commissioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered November 27, 1978, which granted the petition and remanded the matter to the local agency for reconsideration. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, determination reinstated and confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits (see *Matter of Rickenbacker v Toia,*68 AD2d 871; *Matter of Poulos v D’Elia,*66 AD2d 820). Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
#### Warthell B. ILES, Plaintiff—Appellant, and Monroe Roosevelt Parker, Jr., Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FINANCE AUTHORITY, Defendant—Appellee. In Re: Warthell B. Iles, Debtor. Warthell B. Iles, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Cendant Mortgage Corporation, d/b/a PHH Mortgage Services; North Carolina Agricultural Finance Authority, Defendants—Appellees.

Nos. 06-1549, 06-1550.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 19, 2007.

Decided: Sept. 27, 2007.

Frederick Hope Marsh, Hill, Tucker & Marsh, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Jennifer Jo West, Spotts Fain, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Jeffrey L. Marks, Kaufman & Cañóles, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

*305Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Warthell B. lies appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion to set aside a settlement agreement, dismissing as untimely her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing her Chapter 13 petition, and awarding attorneys’ fees and costs to the Appellees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, *Iles v. N.C. Agric. Fin. Auth.,*Nos. 4:04-cv-00079-WDK; 4:05-cv-00011-WDK (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 31, 2006 & entered Apr. 3, 2006; Apr. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1903 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1903

  To direct that certain coal mine safety grant funds be directed to 
       study the prevention and treatment of Black Lung Disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2013

  Mr. McKinley (for himself and Mr. Enyart) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct that certain coal mine safety grant funds be directed to 
       study the prevention and treatment of Black Lung Disease.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRANT FUNDS TO STUDY THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF BLACK 
              LUNG DISEASE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Labor shall award competitive 
grants under the Brookwood-Sago Mine Safety Grants established by 
section 14 of the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 
2006 to entities eligible to receive grants under such section for 
research and outreach related to the prevention and treatment of Black 
Lung Disease.
    (b) Funding.--
            (1) Establishment of fund.--There is established in the 
        Treasury of the United States a separate account for the 
        deposit of penalties described in paragraph (2) to be known as 
        the Mine Safety Grant Fund.
            (2) Deposit of civil penalties.--The Secretary of Labor 
        shall deposit amounts determined by the Secretary that are 
        collected as penalties under section 110 of the Federal Mine 
        Safety and Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 820) into the Mine 
        Safety Grant Fund established by paragraph (1).
            (3) Availability of funds.--Amounts in the Mine Safety 
        Grant Fund shall be available to the Secretary of Labor, as 
        provided in subsection (c), to award grants under the 
        Brookwood-Sago Mine Safety Grants established by section 14 of 
        the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006. 
        $10,000,000 of such amounts (or a greater amount as determined 
        by the Secretary based on the availability of funds) shall be 
        used by the Secretary to award grants for the purposes 
        described in subsection (a).
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--In addition to funds 
appropriated under section 114 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health 
Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 824), there is authorized to be appropriated 
from the Mine Safety Grant Fund to the Secretary of Labor an amount 
equal to the total amount deposited into the fund pursuant to 
subsection (b)(2) during the previous fiscal year. Such amounts are 
authorized to remain available until expended.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.1**

**AFFINITYGROUP HOLDING, INC.**

**STATEMENTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I, Michael A. Schneider,President and Chief Executive Officer of Affinity Group Holding, Inc., aDelaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify as follows:

1.                                       Thisstatement is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”);

2.                                       ThePeriodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

3.                                       Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company asof dates and for the periods indicated therein.

Date:  August 14, 2006
|   | /s/ Michael A. Schneider              |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael A. Schneider                  |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or such other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of the written statement asrequired by Section 906, has been provided to Affinity Group Holding, Inc. andwill be retained by Affinity Group Holding, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
M. P. No. 79-421.

#### David LaRoche *et al. v.*Commerce Oil Refining Corporation.

*Thomas H. Quinn, Jr.,*for petitioners. *Letts, Quinn é- Licht, Daniel J. Murray,*for respondent.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
EXHIBIT 21





SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



Certain of Phosphate Resource Partners Limited Partnership's subsidiaries are listed below. These subsidiaries are all included in the Company's consolidated financial statements, and collectively,
together with Phosphate Resource Partners Limited Partnership, account for more than 90 percent of consolidated net sales, earnings (loss) before income taxes, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principal, and total assets.





|                        | State of
Organization | Name Under 
Which it
Does Business
|----------------------- | --------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                        |                       |                                   
|Agrico Chemical Company | Delaware              | Same                              
|IMC Phosphates Company  | Delaware              | Same                              
|IMC Phosphates MP, Inc. | Delaware              | Same
§ 1724.50 Compliance with National Electrical Safety Code (NESC). The provisions of this section apply to all borrower electric system facilities regardless of the source of financing. ( a ) A borrower shall ensure that its electric system, including all electric distribution, transmission, and generating facilities, is designed, constructed, operated, and maintained in accordance with all applicable provisions of the most current and accepted criteria of the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) and all applicable and current electrical and safety requirements of any State or local governmental entity. Copies of the NESC may be obtained from the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, Inc., 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08855. This requirement applies to the borrower's electric system regardless of the source of financing.
( b ) Any electrical standard requirements established by RUS are in addition to, and not in substitution for or a modification of, the most current and accepted criteria of the NESC and any applicable electrical or safety requirements of any State or local governmental entity.
( c ) Overhead distribution circuits shall be constructed with not less than the Grade C strength requirements as described in Section 26, Strength Requirements, of the NESC when subjected to the loads specified in NESC Section 25, Loadings for Grades B and C. Overhead transmission circuits shall be constructed with not less than the Grade B strength requirements as described in NESC Section 26.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Affinity Group Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statementis provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2009 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.                                       The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.                                       The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of dates andfor the periods indicated therein.

 

 
| Date: June 5, 2009 |                      |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    |                      |
|                    |                      |
|                    | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe       |
|                    | Thomas F. Wolfe           |
|                    | Senior Vice President and |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity GroupHolding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 47513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19151]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8821]

In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of Asbat al-Ansar, 
(and other aliases), as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to 
Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled pursuant 
to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as 
amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in consultation with 
the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that 
the circumstances that were the basis for the 2009 decision to maintain 
the designation of the aforementioned organization as a Foreign 
Terrorist Organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant 
revocation of the designation and that the national security of the 
United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 1, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-19151 Filed 8-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```