alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Thomas J.                Ward                                   Thomas                J. WardChief                  Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board(principal                  executive officer) |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

*This      certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that      section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing      under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except      to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by      reference.*

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF FRANK AIELLO


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

     In connection with the Periodic Report of Cal Alta Auto Glass, Inc.,(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 14, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank
Aiello, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 14, 2007                By: /s/ Frank Aiello
                                          ------------------
                                           Frank Aiello
                              President/CEO/Principal Accounting Officer/ Dir.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Janet Grace, Deceased. Michael P. Grace, II, Appellant; Joseph P. Grace, Jr., Respondent.

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 11, 1966, modified so as to deny respondent’s cross motion to dismiss appellant’s objections insofar as it relates to the portion of the fourth objection which objects, on the ground of excessiveness, to the allowance for legal fees requested by respondent. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In this proceeding by respondent as surviving trustee of an express trust to settle his second supplemental account, appellant filed five objections to the account and moved to take the depositions of respondent and his attorney with respect thereto. Respondent cross-moved to dismiss the objections and for denial of appellant’s motion. By the order under review, respondent’s cross motion was granted and appellant’s motion was denied. In our opinion that determination was proper, on the record presented (cf. *Matter of Grace,*5 A D 2d 845; *Matter of Grace,*20 A D 2d 970), except as to the dismissal of the part of the fourth objection which was based on the ground that the legal fees requested by respondent were excessive. Appellant is entitled to a hearing on that issue (cf. *Matter of O’Malley,*286 App. Div. 869); and either party may move to place this proceeding on the Special Term, Part I, Calendar of the court below for such a hearing. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 10.28
 ONE VIPER WAY
SECOND AMENDMENT TO INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT
SINGLE TENANT  NET
 Second Amendment Landlord Tenant
 RECITALS
 Lease
    AGREEMENT
 Title
    Term
 Premises Second Expansion Area Exhibit B
 1




---



##### 



Base Rent Second Expansion Date
 Year of Term
    
    Base Rent/Mo.Second Expansion Date - 12/31/06
    
    $
    161,073Year 1
    
    $
    161,073Year 2
    
    $
    165,905Year 3
    
    $
    170,882Year 4
    
    $
    176,009Year 5
    
    $
    181,289Year 6
    
    $
    186,728Year 7
    
    $
    192,330Year 8
    
    $
    198,099Year 9
    
    $
    202,042Year 10
    
    $
    210,164
  Vehicle Parking Spaces
 Security Deposit
 Leaseback of Space Exhibit B Leaseback Space
 2




---



##### 



Year of Term
    
    Monthly Base Rent CreditSecond Expansion Date - 12/31/06
    
    $7,495Year 1
    
    $7,495Year 2
    
    $7,720Year 3
    
    $7,952Year 4
    
    $8,190Year 5
    
    $8,436Year 6
    
    $8,689Year 7
    
    $8,950Year 8
    
    $9,218Year 9
    
    $9,495Year 10
    
    $9,780
  Tenant Certification
 Confirmation
 LANDLORD
    
    
    
    TENANTGREENE PROPERTIES, INC.,
a California corporation
    
    
    
    DIRECTED ELECTRONICS, INC.,
a California corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Darrell E. Issa
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ James E. MinarikName:
    
    Darrell E. Issa
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    James E. MinarikTitle:
    
    President
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
 3
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA study on the sensitivity and simultaneous adjustment of a hoop-column antenna surfaceThe results of a recent surface adjustment of the 15-meter diameter hoop-column antenna are presented. A least-squares differential algorithm is used to adjust the surface shape as close as possible to a perfect parabola. Since the desired perfect parabola is not uniquely known a priori, parameters of the perfect parabola are included in the design vector along with the cable length changes. As an extension to an earlier study, lateral sensitivity is included in the least-squares adjustment procedure. In addition, the effect of cable length uncertainties on the surface RMS error is considered and an error bound is derived. The results in this study indicate an improvement over earlier studies. The sensitivity analysis provided a quantitative measure of the needed accuracy of the cable adjustments in the laboratory. Recommendations are included to further enhance shape adjustment.Document ID19900004491Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLim, Kyong Been*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Juang, Jer-Nan*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Maghami, Peiman*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-101538NAS 1.15:101538Accession Number90N13807Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 585-01-21-08Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004491.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### OLIVER v. ELLIS.

No. 14797.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

March 5, 1954.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1954.

*824Bernard H. Oliver, Jr., in pro. per.

John Ben Shepperd, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Willis E. Gresham, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an attempt to appeal from an order refusing to issue the writ of habeas corpus, sued out by a prisoner seeking release from State custody, in which he is held pursuant to State process. The district judge permitted the appeal in forma pauperis, but declined to issue a certificate of probable cause.

Our examination of the record to determine whether such a certificate should be issued and the appeal allowed discloses that the contentions made are without merit. We, therefore, decline to issue a certificate of probable cause, and accordingly dismiss the appeal.

Dismissed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1295** 

THOMAS A. HOLLEY, In the matter of: Realy Novalla White: Deceased , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MICHAEL J. MCARTHUR, Superior Clerk of Court; BLAIR FUNERAL SERVICE; J ESSIE HOLLEY , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:10

- cv
- 00001

- REP )

Submitted : May 20, 2010 Decided: May 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Thomas A. Holley, Appellant Pro Se. Robert L. O’Donnell, VANDEVENTER BLACK, LLP, Norfolk , Virginia, for Appellee; Jessie Holley, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Thomas A. Holley appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction
and improper venue . We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Holley v. McArthur , No. 3:10

- cv
- 00001

- REP (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the quarterly report of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Sophocles Zoullas, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: May 9, 2006

/s/ Sophocles Zoullas
-----------------------
   Sophocles Zoullas
   Chief Executive Officer

25083.0001 #668643
#### § 1775.34 Source of funds.

Grants will be made from not less than 1 percent or not more than 3 percent of any appropriations for grants under Section 306(a)(2) of the CONACT. Funds not obligated by September 1 of each fiscal year will be used for water and waste disposal grants made in accordance with part 1780 of this chapter.
Order entered May 10 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00985
- CV ALAA MOHAMAMD WEISS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County C riminal Court of Appeals No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. M0474358



### O RDER Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c)(1), we ORDER Dallas County
Clerk John F. Warren to file , no later than May 20, 2019 , either a supplemental cler k’s record containing a copy of the order on the petition for non disclosure, signed on or about May 4, 2018 , or written verification no order exists

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(c)(1). The supplemental clerk’s record shall also contain a copy of the trial c ourt’s docket sheet or case summary.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Mr. Warren and the parties.
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
August 8, 2016

Mr. Paul Pritchett Unmanned System Services, LLC Representative for Ironclad Construction and Holding Company, LLC
3707 Delachaise Street
New Orleans

, LA 7 0125

Re: FAA

– 2016

– 4765

Dear Mr. Pritchett :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request

. We have determined that

y our request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption

.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/
Brenda Robeson Program A nalyst
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Castle Arch Real Estate Investment Company, L.L.C. a California limited liability company (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I, Kirby D. Cochran, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:



a.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



b.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Kirby D. Cochran

Kirby D. Cochran, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



Dated March 15, 2006
§ 1484.70 Reports. ( a ) Cooperators are required to submit regular financial and performance reports in accordance with their agreement. Reporting requirements and formats for the required financial and performance reports will be specified in the agreement between CCC and the Cooperator.
( b ) ( 1 ) In addition to the information required in 2 CFR 200.329(c)(2), a Cooperator's performance reports must include pertinent information regarding the Cooperator's progress, measured against established indicators, baselines, and targets, towards achieving the expected results specified in the agreement. This reporting must include, for each performance indicator, a comparison of actual accomplishments with the baseline and the targets established for the period. When actual accomplishments deviate significantly from targeted goals, the Cooperator must provide an explanation in the report.
( 2 ) A Cooperator must ensure the accuracy and reliability of the performance data submitted to FAS in performance reports. At any time during the period of performance of the agreement, FAS may review the Cooperator's performance data to determine whether it is accurate and reliable. The Cooperator must comply with all requests made by FAS or an entity designated by FAS in relation to such reviews.
( c ) All final performance reports will be made available to the public.
( d ) Not later than 45 calendar days after the completion of travel (other than local travel), a Cooperator shall submit a trip report. The report must be submitted to the appropriate Attaché/Counselor(s) and must include the name(s) of the traveler(s), purpose of travel, itinerary, names and affiliations of contacts, and a brief summary of findings, conclusions, recommendations, and specific accomplishments.
( e ) Not later than 90 calendar days after the end of its program year, a Cooperator shall submit a report on any research conducted pursuant to the approved FMD program.
( f ) If requested by FAS, a Cooperator must provide to FAS additional information or reports relating to the agreement.
( g ) If a Cooperator requires an extension of a reporting deadline, it must ensure that FAS receives an extension request at least five business days prior to the reporting deadline. FAS may decline to consider a request for an extension that it receives after this time period. FAS will consider requests for reporting deadline extensions on a case by case basis and will make a decision based on the merits of each request. FAS will consider factors such as unforeseen or extenuating circumstances and past performance history when evaluating requests for extensions.
[85 FR 1084, Jan. 9, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 68882, Dec. 6, 2021]
§ 1787.10 Applications for specific waivers. RUS borrowers may request a specific waiver of the Buy American requirement through a written, detailed explanation showing that: ( a ) The cost between the nondomestic product and domestic product is unreasonable;
( b ) There is a non-availability of domestic products; or
( c ) It is not in the public interest or impractical for the RUS Borrower to purchase a domestic product.
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Mr. Marc W. Atwood 

Cozen O'Connor 

1627 I St., NW, Ste. 1100 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

$or 

Issue date: September 18, 2014 

Authority expires: October 27, 2014 

~------------------------------~ 

NOTICE OF CONSISTENCY 

Kalitta Air, L.L.C. 

is a properly certificated carrier that holds authority to conduct charter operations to and from China. Based on 

a proposal submitted by the carrier, we have determined that the operations comply with the applicable 

Department regulations and the provisions of the 2014-2015 U.S.-China Protocol. 

Number of Flights: three (3) one-way charters1 

Flight Date(s): October 11, 18, 25, 2014 

Points: Shanghai (PVG)- Anchorage (ANC)*- Chicago (ORD) 

Equipment: B747-400 BCF 

The U.S. carrier operating the above charter flight should report, in writing, to the U.S. Air Carrier Licensing 

Division (X-44), Office oflntemational Aviation, Department of Transportation, on its operation for the 

preceding month by the tenth of each month whether the flights operated. 

This notice is valid only for the flight contained in the above program. 

*Denotes technical stop only. 

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at: 

www. regulations.gov 

1 Following our grant ofKalitta Air L.L.C.'s request for three (3) one-way charter allocations 66 one-way charter allocations remain 

available in the Zone I charter pool for the 2014/15-charter year.
p. 1



# OAR Box 1778 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 259 ) IV-C-5 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/20089:51:04

AM Sheet 259of 276P. 2

<w, * UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y I S5/ X? P fflc e o fAi rQualit vP| annin g an d Standard s *<i^A Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a2771 1 

## IV-C-- T

'-« < PPO^ 0 FIL E00_E> Y nr_ 

## 165 ! I 2 10 0 | s 

## j j Honorabl e Davi d L . Hobso n, ' Hous e o f Representative s ',; '
_ „ Washington , D.C . 2051 5 • * ;; • [ | f j 5 ) Dea r Mr . Hobson : Thi s i s i nrespons e t o you r lette r o f Septembe r 3 , 1991 , regardin g th e Environmenta l Protectio nAgency' s (EPA's ) interpretatio no f th e definitio no f "repowering. " Sectio n402(12 ) o f th e Clea nAi r Ac t Amendment s o f 199 0 define s repowerin g a s th e "replacemen t o f a nexistin g coal-fire dboiler " wit hon e o f severa l specifie dclea ncoa l technologies
. Th e definitio nals o includes , a s qualifyin g technologies , othe r technologie s whic har e derivative s o f "on e o r mor e o f th e [specified ] technologies , an dan yothe r technolog ycapabl e o f controllin g multipl e combustio nemission s simultaneousl ywit h improve d boile r o r generatio nefficienc yan dwit hsignificantl y greate r wast e reductio nrelativ e t o th e performanc e o f technolog y i nwidesprea d commercia l use. " A s yo u hav e correctl ypointe d out , thi s definition , a s written , coul db e interprete da s limitin g technologie s whic hwoul db e considere drepowerin g project s t o thos e tha t onl yinvolv e th e replacemen t o f th e boiler
. A s yo u ma yknow , a s par t o f th e rulemakin g process , EP Ai s currentl ytakin g comment s o nit s proposa l t o amen dregulation s implementin g ne wsourc e requirement s governin g modification s a t electri c utilit ygeneratin g units
. Th e propose drul e incorporate s th e statutor ydefinitio no f repowerin g withou t change . You r commen t i s bein g give ncarefu l consideration , an d EP Awil l b e addressin g thi s issu e i nth e fina l rulemaking
. I appreciat e thi s opportunit yt o b e o f servic e an dtrus t tha t thi s informatio nwil l b e helpfu l t o you . Sincerely , 

## AJ Willia mG . Rosenber g assistan t Administrato i fo r Ai r an dRadiatio n