Janice K. Brewer Governor



### July 3, 2014 

## ARIZONA DEPARTMENT
OF 

## ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

1110 West Washington Street• Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 771-2300 • www.azdeq.gov



### Meredith Kurpius, Manager Air Quality Analysis Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 7 5 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

Re: State of Arizona Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan

Dear Ms. Kurpius: Henry R. Darwin Director



### Please find the enclosed document "State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan: For the Year 2014". Submissio.n of this report satisfies the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality's (ADEQ) obligation under 40 CFR 58.lO(a), to complete and submit to the EPA an annual plan for the State ambient air monitoring network. This letter, along with ADEQ's 2014 Monitoring Network Plan, is also being distributed in electronic format. ·

As required by 40 CFR 58.lO(a), ADEQ made the document available for public review through the Agency Webpage. A copy of the public notice·. document is attached for your review and information.

No public comments were received concerning the plan.

If 

### you have any questions or comments regarding the document, please contact Theresa Rigney
at (602) 771-2274, Heather Colson at (602) 771-4488, or Mark Carrel at (602) 771-2359.

# ~Y·~ ..

# k~~,r·"··. Eric 

## C

..**~** 

## ...**~** 

## , · irector Air**Qu~** 

### ivision 

# /

' 

### cc: Jennifer Williams, US EPA, Region 9 Theresa Rigney, ADEQ Heather Colson, ADEQ Mark Carrel, ADEQ Craig Pearson, ADEQ

Southern Regional Office 400 West Congress Street• Suite 433 •Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 628-6733

Printed on recycled paper

# State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan

For the Year 201 4

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Air Quality Division

Air Assessment Section

July 1, 2014

Final

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 1

## Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 4
2.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS

................................ ................................ ... 6

2.1 NAAQS C OMPLIANCE 

### N ETWORK



### ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 6

2.2 S TATE 

### I MPLEMENTATION 

### P LAN 

### (SIP) AND 

### M AINTENANCE 

### A REA 

### N ETWORK



### ................................ ..... 6

2.3 S OURCE



### - O RIENTED 

### N ETWORK



### ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 7

2.4 NC ORE 

### N ETWORK



### ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 7

2.5 M ETEOROLOGICAL 

### N ETWORK



### ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 7

2.6 P HOTOCHEMICAL 

### A SSESSMENT 

### M ONITORING 

### S TATIONS 

### (PAMS)

................................ ..................... 8

2.7 N ATIONAL 

### A IR 

### T OXICS 

### T REND 

### S ITES 

### (NATTS)

................................ ................................ ................ 8

2.8 C HEMICAL 

### S PECIATION 

### N ETWORK 

### (CSN)

................................ ................................ ......................... 8

2.9 C LASS 

### 1 A REA 

### N ETWORK AND 

### IMPROVE P ROGRAM



### ................................ ................................ ....... 9

2.10 A IR 

### N OW 

### R EPORTING



### ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 9

2.11 U RBAN 

### H AZE 

### N ETWORK



### ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 9

2.12 E

- BAM N ETWORK OF 

### PM 2.5 

### S PECIAL 

### P URPOSE 

### M ONITORS



### ................................ ............................. 9

2.13 A RIZONA 

### / M EXICO 

### B ORDER 

### N ETWORK



### ................................ ................................ ......................... 10

3.0 MONITORING NE TWORK EVALUATION

................................ ................................ ................... 11

3.1 SITE CLOSURES

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 11

3.2 N EW 

### S ITES 

### P LANNED



### ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 11

3.3 N ETWORK 

### C HANGES



### – C URRENT AND 

### P LANNED



### ................................ ................................ ............. 11

4.0 ADEQ MO NITORING NETWORKS

................................ ................................ ............................... 15

4.1 PM 2.5 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................ ................................ ............... 15

4.2 PM 10 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................ ................................ ............... 18

4.3 O 3 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................ ................................ .................... 21

4.4 P B 

### M ONITORI NG 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................ ................................ ................... 22

4.5 SO 2 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................ ................................ ................. 23

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 2

### 4.6 NO 2 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................ ................................ ................. 24

4.7 C ARBON MONOXIDE 

### (CO) M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................ ............... 25

4.8 PAMS M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................ ................................ ............. 26

4.9 NC ORE 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................ ................................ ............ 28

4.10 SIP M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................ ................................ ................ 29

N OTE 

### : S ITES IN ITALICS ARE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRE D IN 

### SIP ; OTHERS MEET THE GENE RAL 

### SIP
REQUIREMENT THAT REP RESENTATIVE MONITORI NG BE CONDUCTED 

### ( NO SPECIFIC MONITORI NG SITES

ARE NAMED IN 

### SIP).

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 30

4.11 S OURCE 

### C OMPLIANCE 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK 

### R EQUIREMENTS



### ................................ ................... 30

4.12 C LASS 

### 1 V ISIBILITY 

### N ETWORK



### ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 32

4.13 U RBAN 

### H AZE 

### M ONIT ORING 

### N ETWORK



### ................................ ................................ .......................... 33

4.14 M ETEOROLOGY 

### M ONITORING 

### N ETWORK



### ................................ ................................ ....................... 34

5.0 QUALITY ASSURANC E

................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 36

5.1 ADEQ Q UALITY 

### A SSURANCE 

### P ROGRAM AND 

### P ROJECT 

### P LANS



### ................................ ....................... 37

5 .2 EPA QA R EPORTS AND 

### N ETWORK 

### P ERFORMANCE



### ................................ ................................ .......... 38

APPENDIX A DEFINITION S AND ABBREVIATIONS

................................ ................................ ..... 39

APPENDIX B NETWORK MAPS

................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 4 3

APPENDIX C SITE INFORMATION DATA TABLES

................................ ................................ ...... 5 4

APPENDIX D SITE INFORMATION DATA TABLES

................................ ................................ ....... 8 4

APPENDIX E MINIMUM REQUIREM ENTS FOR CRITERIA POLLUTANTS

............................. 13 6

APPENDIX F REQUEST FOR SITING WAIVER......

........................................... ....... ........ 1 40

APPE NDIX G INTERAGENCY AIR QUAL ITY MONITORING FOR ARIZONA

............. ....... ... 14 3

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 31.0 INTRODUCTION

This document fulfills the obligation, under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, § 58.10(a), requiring the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to complete and submit to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) an annual monitoring network plan for the year 201 4

.

This plan informs EPA Region 9 of the monitoring activities ADEQ has implemented since July 201 3 , as well as activities ADEQ will un dertake through December 201 5 . However, some changes may occur after the plan is published and approved due to unforeseen events at monitoring sites, funding changes, or changes in EPA monitoring requirements. Data from ADEQ's monitors are reported to EPA' s Air Quality System (AQS) database and to A ir Now. In 40 CFR Part 51, EPA requires states to create, submit, and adopt State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to address the various issues and responsibilities involved with creating and implementing air quality
programs. 40 CFR Part 51 Subpart J specifies that 40 CFR Part 58 Subpart

- C contain the requirements for establishing air quality surveillance systems to monitor ambient air quality.

Air quality surveillance systems consist of networks of monitors locate d at carefully selected physical locations referred to as sites or stations

. Some of the networks, sites, and monitors include :

• State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS)

• National Core multipollutant monitoring stations (NCore)

• Photochemical Assessme nt Monitoring Stations (PAMS)

• Chemical Speciation Network (CSN)

• National Air Toxics Trends Sites (NATTS)

• Special Purpose Monitors (SPM)

• Urban Haze monitoring sites

• I nteragency M onitoring of PRO tected V isual E nvironments (IMPROVE)

• Air Now information sites

• Source

- oriented monitoring sites operated independently by permittees (Industry)

• Meteorological sites

This Annual Monitoring Network Plan identifies the purpose(s) of each monitor and provides evidence that both the siting and the operation of each monitor meet s the requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 A ppendices A, C, D, and E as follows:



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 4• Appendix A

– Quality Assurance Requirements for SLAMS, SPMs, and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Air Monitoring

• Appendix C

– Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Method ology

• Appendix D

– Network Design Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

• Appendix E

– Probe and Monitoring Path Siting Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

The results of the annual network review and planning are used to determine how well the networks are achieving their required air monitoring objectives, how well they meet data users’ needs, and how they should be modified to continue meeting their objectives and data needs

. M odifications can include the termination of existing stations, re location of stations, establishment of new stations, monitoring of additional parameters, and/or changes to the sampling schedule

. The annual network review and planning are performed for the purpose of improving the monitoring networks and ensuring that they provide adequate, representative, and regulatory compliant air quality data.



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 52.0 ADEQ PROGRAM AND NETWORK DESCRIPTIONS

ADEQ operates ambient air quality equipment for a variety of Federal and State monitoring programs

. Detailed descriptions of the e quipment deployed for each monitoring program are presented in Appendix C of this Network Plan . The equipment is grouped by monitoring program or network to easily compare instrument specifics

. Appendix D of this Network Plan lists information on each of ADEQ's current and recently closed monitoring sites

, including those sites which ADEQ shares with other agencies or serves as the local site operator

. General information about the monitoring programs in which ADEQ participates is described in the followi ng sections.

2.1 NAAQS Compliance Network

ADEQ’s compliance network consists of monitoring sites operated for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for the “criteria” pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO ), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), ozone (O 3 ), particulate matter (PM 10 and PM 2.5 ), and lead (Pb)

. For each of these pollutants, EPA has established national air quality sta ndards to protect public health

. The criteria pollutants are measur ed using instruments designated by EPA as Federal Reference Methods (FRM) or Federal Equivalent Methods (FEM)

. 40 CFR Part 58 specifies the minimum requirements for determining NAAQS compliance including the following network and site criteria:

• Number and types of monitors required per Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) by pollutant

• Objectives and spatial scales

• Sampling frequency

• Collocation

• Special NCore

- related requirements

• Meteorology

• Probe location and other restrictions within a site

• Periodic perfor mance evaluations

• Quality Assurance

• Data reporting

2.2 State Implementation Plan (SIP) and Maintenance Area Network

ADEQ maintains several air monitoring sites for the purpose of tracking compliance in areas that are currently in

no n

- attain ment for one or more of the NAAQS

, and in areas where the NAAQS have been met but on

- g oing demonstration of maintenance is required

. Specific m onitoring requirements for each of these areas are described in their respective SIPs and/ or Maintenance Plans

.



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 62.3 Source

- Ori ented Network

Several major point sources in the state are required to conduct ambient monitoring for criteria pollutants, primarily PM 10 and SO 2 , as part of their air quality permit

. Some of the source

- generated data from these sites have b een submitted to AQS

. As indicated in the 2012 Network Plan, ADEQ met with Freeport

- McMoRan Copper and Gold

, Inc

. (FMMI ) to discuss the role of Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO) for the Miami Golf Course PM 10 , Miami Townsite SO 2 , and Miami Jones Ranch SO 2 monitors

. ADEQ collocated instruments at these sites to meet the PQAO requirements for submit tal of these data to AQS

. ADEQ installed the
PM 10 monitor at the Miami Golf Course site in fall 2012, and the SO 2 monitors at the Miami Jones Ran ch site and Miami Townsite in early 2013

. Data are bein g collected from both the FMMI and ADEQ monitors at these sites for at least one year for comparability analysis and preparation of the comparative data analysis review for submittal to EPA . After data comparison of the PM10 at Miami Golf Course, the data were found to be reasonably comparable and FMMI has stoppe d monitoring at the site. The data comparison for the SO2 will be completed in the near future an d if found to be comparable, FMMI will have t he option to stop monitoring at these sites as well. Discussions with American Smelting and Refining Company ( ASA R CO ) are ongoing to have ADEQ c ollocate SO 2 at sites in and around Hayden, AZ

.

2.4 NCore Network

EPA describes the nationwide NCore network , whic h is composed of approximately 70 urban and 20 rural sites

, as a multipollutant network that integrates several advanced measurement systems for particles, pollutant gases, and meteorology

. Some objectives of the NCore network include :

• Tracking long

- term trends of criteria and non

- criteria pollutants;

• Support for long

- term health assessments which contribute to ongoing reviews of the NAAQS;

• Support to scientific studies ranging across technological, health, and atmospheric process disciplines

• S upport to ec osystem assessments recognizing that national air quality networks benefit ecosystem assessments and, in turn, benefit from data specifically designed to address ecosystem analyses.

As required by 40 CFR Part 58.13, ADEQ’s NCore site

, JLG Supersite

, was op erational by January 1, 2011

. In addition to the above missions and the NCore monitoring requirements set forth in the 40 CFR Part 58.13 , ADEQ will use the JLG Supersite to test new technologies in various ADEQ monitoring networks

. Examples include advan ced communications and serial data collection, remote zero/ span /precision (Z/S/P) checks and calibrations, high sensitivity instruments, and instruments that monitor additional pollutants that may be added to current CFR requirements

. Additional NCore inf ormation is available from the EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/ncore/index.html

2.5 Meteorological Network

ADEQ collects meteorological data at sites throughout the state to support the analysis of ambient air quality data and to provide support for exceptional event reporting

. Meteorological measurements are also required for the NCore and PAMS networks

. ADEQ continues to add meteorological instrumentation to most of ADEQ’s monitor ing sites that were not previously eq uipped

, and for which there are adequate facilities to support the



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 7meteorological tower and equipment

. ADEQ currently meets the meteorological monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS networks.

2.6 Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS)

Section 182(c)(1) of the 1990 Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments requires the Administrator to promulgate rules for enhanced monitoring of O 3 that includes concurrent monitoring of O 3 , oxides of nitrogen (NOx), total react ive nitrogen (NOy ) , speciated volatile organic compounds (VOC), carbonyls, CO, and meteorology to obtain comprehensive and representative O 3 data

. Immediately following the promulgation of those rules, ADEQ began to implement a program to improve ambient monitoring activities related to the precursors of O 3 . The subsequent revisions to 40 CFR Part 58 (1993) required states to establish PAMS as part of their monitoring networks in O 3 nonattainment areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme

. The princ ipal reasons for requiring the collection of additional ambient air pollutants and meteorological data are the widespread nonattainment of the O 3 NAAQS and the need for a more comprehensive air quality database for O 3 and its precursors

. ADEQ operates thr ee PAMS sites to represent the Phoenix metropolitan area: JLG Supersite (type 2), Queen Valley (type 3), and VEI (meteorological)

. EPA assembled a workgroup to evaluate the current PAMS program and to consider the possible re

- invention of the PAMS program

. The scope of the evaluation was extensive and included PAMS objectives, methods, network design, and quality assurance

. ADEQ participate s in the PAMS re

- engineering process and will continue to follow its activity closely to be aware of possible future implications for the ADEQ network.

2.7 National Air Toxics Trend Sites (NATTS)

The NATTS network was designed to monitor a nd record the concentrations of EPA identified air toxics on a national scale. Data from EPA’s national monitoring activities are used to estimate national average concentrations for these air toxics compounds and to detect trends. Using this information, EPA, states, and local agencies can estimate changes to the human exposure from air toxics . Detection of increased human toxicity risk can then be used to support changes in environmental policy. As part of the National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) process, ambient air quality data are used to assess the national toxics inventory and long

- term hazardous air pollutant (HAP) trends

. A DEQ ’ s JLG Supersite is the designated NATTS site for the Phoenix M SA.

2.8 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN)

The CSN was established to meet the regulatory requirements for monitoring speciated PM 2.5 to determine the chemical composition of thes e particles

. The purpose of the CSN is to determine, over a period of several years, trends in concentration levels of selected ions, metals, carbon species, and organic compounds in the PM 2.5 samples collected at select sites throughout the country

. The program began in 1999 with 54 Speciation Trends Network (STN) sites across the nation located primarily in or near larger MSAs

. The network has increased to around 200 sites nationwide

. PM 2.5 speciation m onitoring at JLG Supersite includes two CSN PM 2.5 speciation samplers

. The collocated IMPROVE samplers provide precision and bias information for the IMPROVE network and the data are reasonably comparable to the CSN speciation data

. In 2009, the URG 3000N sampler was added at JLG for collecting the car bon sample in lieu of the Met One SuperSASS, which had been used to collect all three types of filter samples e.g. Quartz, Teflon, and Nylon

. The laboratory analysis method for carbon samples collected by the URG also changed

. These changes to the CSN pr ogram’s monitoring and analytical design were



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 8geared toward more closely matching the carbon analytes from the CSN sampler to those collected via the IMPROVE network.

2.9 Class 1 Area Network and IMPROVE Program

The rural v isibility monitoring networks tr ack impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas

. These parks and wilderness areas are called federally mandatory Class 1 a reas and were designated based on an evaluation required by Congress in the 1977 F ederal CAA Amendments

. The evaluat ion, performed by the United States Forest Service (USFS) and National Park Service (NPS), reviewed the areas of parks and national forests

, which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were larger than 6,000 acres, and to which visual air

w as an impor tant resource for the visitor experience

. Of the 156 Class 1 a reas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona

. Nine Class 1 areas are located in USFS land and three in NPS land

. EPA initiated the nationally

- operated IMPROVE monitoring netwo rk in 1987

, whose purpose is to characterize broad regional trends and visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class 1 w ilderness a reas across the United States

. Ten Class 1 IMPROVE sites were originally placed in and around these Class 1 areas. One of these sites, Grand Canyon National Park

- Indian Gardens, has been shut down recently. Additionally, ADEQ added six other IMPROVE sites identified as Protocol sites. Refer to section 4.12 and the map in Appendix B for additional det ails regarding ADEQ’s Class 1 Visibility and IMPROVE networks.

2.10 Air Now Reporting

ADEQ rep orts near real

- time data for of its continuous air quality monitors to the AirNow system. The AirNow system is a set of near real

- time public maps which report a n Air Quality Index (AQI) for the five major air pollutants regulated by the Clean Air Act. These pollutants are: ground

- le vel O 3 , PM
, CO

, SO 2 , and NO 2 . The purpose of the AQI is to help understand what local air quality means to your health. To make it easier to understand, the AQI is divided into six color coded categories : Good, Moderate, Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups, Unhealthy, Very Unhealthy and Hazardous. ADEQ will continue to expand ef forts for data submission to A ir Now to support the collectio n and nationwide dissemination of consistently provided air quality data in the AQI . The AQI format is used by local weather forecasters, medical facilities, schools and the general public to make health

- related activity decisions based on the reported lo cal AQI.

2.11 Urban Haze Network

The purpose of the Urban Haze Network is to provide State and Local policy

- makers and the public with information regarding the urban haze levels, track short

- term and long

- term trends, assess source contributions, and bett er evaluate the effectiveness of air pollution control strategies

. A DEQ utilizes transmissometers, particulate monitors, and/or digital camera systems to evaluate urban visibility

. More than a decade of urban visibility data has been collected for the Ph oenix and Tucson area

. Currently, only the Phoenix metropolitan area urban visibility is monitored using high resolution cameras

. Additional details regarding ADEQ’s Urban Haze Network can be found in section 4.13

.

2.12 E

- BAM Network of PM 2.5 Special P urpose Monitors

E

- BAM monitors are special purpose monitors which provide continuous, real

- time particulate concentration data that is useful for making informed smoke management decisions related to prescribed burns and wildfire



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 9monitoring

. The current n etwork of special purpose continuous particulate monitors (listed in Table 2.12

- 1) is composed of lightweight, portable E

- BAM monitors typically in self

- contained, environmentally sealed enclosures

. They can be battery or solar powered for operation at si tes without fixed electrical power

. Data are sampled every second and concentrations are calculated and recorded every minute

. E

- BAM monitors have been used by many agencies, particularly in the western United States

. They are not classified as FRMs or FEMs and may not be used to demonstrate NAAQS compliance

. ADEQ uses these monitors primarily in populated areas that could be impacted by smoke from prescribed burns and wildfires

. I n 2011 ADEQ configured the E

- BAM monitors to measure PM 2.5 to be consist ent with the National Forest Service monitors

. Hourly PM 2.5 data from the
E

- BAM monitors can be viewed at: http://www.phoenixvis.net/PPMmain.aspx

.

Table 2.12

- 1 Current Locations of E

- BAM Monitors

S ite Name Address

Flagstaff Middle School 755 N. Bonito, Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Payson Well 204 W. Aero Dr., Payson, AZ 85541

Prescott College AQD 22 6 Grove Ave., Prescott, AZ 86301

Sedona Fire Station AQD 310 Forest Road, Sedona, AZ, 86336

Show Low 561 E . Deuce of Clubs, Show Low, AZ 85901

Springerville 323 S. Mountain Ave., Springerville, AZ 85936

Verde Ranger Station 300 E. Highway 260, Camp Verde, AZ 86322

2.13 Arizona / Mexico Border Network

ADEQ work s with the EPA Border Program as part of the U.S

. – Mexico Border Air Monitoring Working Group

. This working group ’s primary priority is review ing the air quality monitoring data and air monitoring networks in rural and urban areas along the border and evaluat ing the adequacy of these networks

. The se cond ary priority of this group is to identify operational and maintenance needs, plan for future capabilities

, and develop recommendations to resolve any inadequacies

. Through this effort, relationships between EPA, ADEQ, Secretariat of Environment and Na tural Resources (SEMARNAT), and Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development (CEDES) are expected to develop, such that data are shared across the border and capacity is built to meet the needs of the air monitoring program objectives.



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 103.0 MONITORI NG NETWORK EVALUATION

This section provides a summary of changes to ADEQ's monitoring networks completed since the 201 3 Network Plan submission

, as well as changes planned for July 201 4 through December 201 5

. Any occurrence of unplanned changes due to em erging need s , budget constraints , or other circumstances will be documented in next year’s Air Monitoring Network Plan

, and ADEQ will communicate with EPA Region 9 regarding any significant changes on a case

- by

- case basis

. Below is a summary of the planne d network changes

. D etails regarding these changes can be found in Section 4 of this Monitoring Network Plan

.

3.1 Site Closures

Prescott Valley

– Although monitoring in Prescott Valley began in 2007, the MSA population does not require
PM 10 or PM 2.5 mo nitoring there

. Statistical analysis shows that these monitors are reporting concentrations significantly below the NAAQS

. ADEQ shut down both PM 10 and PM 2.5 m onitors at th is sit e on Jan uary 1, 2014

. Instruments were removed on January 16, 2013.

3.2 Ne w Sites Planned

Lake Havasu City, AZ

– A DEQ plans to add monitoring in Lake Havasu City due to it being recently designated

a n MSA

. As there are no data from this area, modeling will be utilized to determine the area of highest concentration

. The data wi ll be used for regulatory purposes as part of the NAAQS Compliance Network and will be used to determine if monitoring will be needed in the future

. An O 3 , PM 10 , and PM 2.5 monitor is planned to be added by Jan uary 2016.

Sierra Vista, AZ

– ADEQ plans to a dd O 3 monitoring in Sierra Vista due to it being recently designated an MSA

. As there is no data from this area, modeling will be utilized to determine the area of highest concentration

. The data will be used for regulatory purposes as part of the NAAQS Compliance Network

, and will be used to determine if monitoring will be needed in the future

. Currently the Sierra Vista MSA has a PM 10 monitor and a
PM 2.5 monitor in Douglas, AZ

. These are located in the area of highest concentration and will used to sa tisfy the requirement s for PM 10 and PM 2.5 monitoring for the MSA

. The O 3 monitor is planned to be added by Jan uary 2016.

3.3 Network Changes

– Current and Planned

Ajo

– A temperature and R H probe was added on February 11, 2014 to match the ADEQ’s meteo rological setup as found at all other sites.

Alamo Lake

– This site is currently the transport/ background site for the O 3 network

. The site is sufficiently remote that it is being configured to be the designated background site for several pollutants

. A DEQ installed a Met One PM 10 FEM BAM 1020 at Alamo Lake on October 30, 2013, a Met One PM 2.5 FEM BAM 1020 on November 15 , 2013, and an Ecotech SO 2 9850T on January 14, 2014. A n Ecotech NO x 9841 , A CO analyzer, and meteorological instruments will be installe d in the next year

. The SO 2 , NO x , and CO analyzers are designated as



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 11SPM for the purpose of providing background data as a part of Arizona’s permitting process, SIP development

, and for modeling

. This will allow permit applicants to use same background d ata throughout the entire state

. The plan is to di scontinue these monitors after two years of monitoring

. Flagstaff PM 10 and PM 2.5 – The s tatistical analysis for Flagstaff shows that PM 10 and PM 2.5 concentrations are significantly below the NAAQS and m onitors are not required for this area based o n MSA population

. ADEQ shut down both the PM 10 and PM 2

. m onitors on January 1, 2014

. Instruments were removed on January 2, 2014

. See Section 3.5 for the statistical analysis in accordance with 40 CFR § 58.14 (c)(1).

Payson Well Site PM 10 – Part of the network planning process is to assess the representativeness of the monitors for sampling ambient air

. There have been several structural changes at the Payson Well Site that are limiting airflow around this mon itor

. These include construction of new buildings and growth of trees

. ADEQ met with the site manager to defin e a more suitable location

. On December 2, 2013

, ADEQ received delivery of a shelter to house a PM 10 FEM BAM 1020

. I n May 2014 electrical power was established to the shelter at Payson Well Site and on XX, 2014 the PM 10 FEM BAM 1020 was thereby replacing the collocated Thermo Partisol PM 10 FRM monitors starting July 1, 2014

. As a result, t his site will no longer be collocated for PM 10, as there i s no collocation requirement for PM 10 FEM monitors

. Prescott College O 3 – In 2013, the administration at Prescott College contacted ADEQ with plans to renovate the building where the O 3 analyzer was located

. The renovation was aligned so that the full 201 3 O 3 season was monitored

, and then the instrument was shut down and removed

. The l ocation of the analyzer did not meet siting requirements pertaining to the proximity of a roadway

. With Grove Ave nue having a daily traffic count of 17,650, a minimum dist ance of 30m is required

. The distance to the roadway of the old location was only 8m, thus requiring ADEQ to submit a yearly waiver to EPA Region 9. The new location is still located at Prescott College, (See Figure 3.3

- 3) but now meets the siting requir ements and is 45m from the roadway

. The new location is located 180m to the south west of the previous site and is free of any obstructions from trees or other buildings

. The site change resulted in an address change from 336 Grove Ave

. to 226 Grove Ave

. Since the site is so close in proximity to the old site, and is now meeting siting requirements, the AQS ID will remain the same

. The analyzer was shut off due to the end of O 3 season on November 1, 2013

, and was removed from the previous location

. Th e instrument was shut off during O 3 season and o n January 16, 2014 a Teledyne 400e analyzer was install ed , replacing the Thermo 49c analyze r for continuous monitoring of O 3 . Data recovery started March 1, 2014 at the beginning of O 3 season.



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 12Figur e 3.3 1 Google Earth Image of the New and Old Location of the Prescott College O 3 Analyzer

Prescott Valley

- The statistical analysis for Prescott Valley shows that PM 10 and PM 2.5 concentrations are significantly below the NAAQS and th at monitors are not required for this area based on MSA population

. ADEQ shut down both the PM 10 and PM 2

. m onitors on January 1, 2014 and i nstruments were removed on January 2, 2014

.

Table 3.3

- 1 Instruments Changes Made from July 201 3 thru June 201 4

Site Name Monitors Date of Change Description

Ajo Temp and R H 11

- Feb

- 2014 A temperature and R H sensor were installed for for e casting purposes.

Alamo Lake PM 10 30

- Oct

- 2013 A Met One FEM BAM 1020 PM 10 w as deployed to the site in October 2013 and designated as Background

.

Ala mo Lake PM 2.5 15

- Nov

- 2013 A Met O ne FEM BAM 1020 PM 2.5 was deployed to the site in November 2013 and designated as Background.

Alamo Lake SO 2 14

- Jan

- 2014 An Ecotech SO 2 9850T was installed in January 2014 and designated as a special purpose monitor.



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 13Site Name Monitors Date of Change Description

Ajo Temp and R H 11

- Feb

- 2014 A temperature and R H sensor were installed for for e casting purposes.

Fl agstaff Middle School PM 10 , PM 2.5 1

- Jan

- 2014 Monitors were discontinued as of January 1, 2014 since multiple years of data shows that the site is significantly below the NAAQS

. A special purpose PM 2.5 monitor (E

- BAM) will continue to be used for smoke

man agement, population exposure monitoring and reporting to the website

. Ozone monitoring will continue at this site.

Payson Well Site PM 10 X

- Mar

- 2014 Currently collocated Partisol FRM PM 10 monitors were replaced with a
PM 10 FEM BAM 1020 starting on July 1, 2014

. Collocation is not required at this site

. Monitoring to be relocated within site property.

Prescott Valley PM 10 , PM 2.5 1

- Jan

- 2014 Monitors were discontinued as of January 1, 2014 since multiple years of data shows that the site is significantly b elow the NAAQS

. System modification (closure) is being made in compliance with 40CFR 58.14(C)(1)

. A special purpose PM 2.5 monitor (E

- BAM) will continue to be used for smoke management, population exposure monitoring and reporting to the website.

Prescot t College O 3 1

- Nov

- 2013 Prescott College O 3 analyzer was moved to a new location on campus due to renovation of previous location

. A Teledyne 400e replaced the Thermo 49c at this time

. AQS ID remains the same

.

Table 3.4

- 2 Instrument Changes Planned f or July 201 4 to December 201 5

Site Name Monitors Date of Change Description

Alamo Lake CO 1

- Jan

- 201 5 A CO monitor will be deployed to the site as a SPM for background data
purposes

.

Alamo Lake NO x 1

- Jan

- 2015 An Ecotech NO x 9841 will be deployed to thi s site as a SPM for background data purposes by 1

- Jan

- 2015.

Alamo Lake Temp, RH, and Wind 1

- Jan

- 2015 Full meteorological equipment will be deployed to this site by 1

- Jan

2015.

Lake Havasu City PM 10 , PM 2.5

, O 3 1

- Jan

- 201 6 Monitors will be planned for inst allation at new site starting Jan. 2016.

Sierra Vista O 3 1

- Jan

- 201 6 Monitor will be planned for installation at new site starting Jan. 2016.



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 144.0 ADEQ MONITORING NETWORKS

The minimum monitoring requirements for each pollutant are described in 40 CFR P art 58 Appendix D and are typically based on the population of urban areas

. Current minimum monitoring requirements are only associated with MSAs, and there are no minimum monitoring requirements for Micropolitan Statistical Areas. Tables 4.0

- 1 and 4.0

- 2 outline metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas in Arizona as identified by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Table 4.0

- 1 Metropolitan Statistical Areas as of the 2010 Census

Metropolitan Statistical Area Area included Population

Flagstaff Coconino Count y 134,421

Lake Havasu City

– Kingman Mohave County 200,186

Phoenix

– Mesa

– Scottsdale Maricopa & Pinal Counties 4,192,887

Prescott Yavapai County 211,033

Sierra Vista

- Douglas Cochise 131,346

Tucson Pima County 980,263

Yuma Yuma County 195,751

Tab le 4.0

- 2 Micropolitan Statistical Areas as of the 2010 Census

Micropolitan Statistical Area County Population

Nogales Santa Cruz 47,420

Payson Gila 53,597

Safford Graham & Greenlee Counties 37,220

Show Low Navajo 107,449

4.1 PM 2.5 Monitoring Network Requirements

The number of PM 2.5 samplers required in urban areas is based on population (see Table 4.0

- 1) and design values for PM 2.5 concentrations (see Table 4.1

- 1).



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 15Table 4.1

- 1 Minimum Number of PM 2.5 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D)

Populat ion (MSA) Most recent 3

- Yr design value ≥ 85% of any

PM 2.5 NAAQS * Most recent 3

- Yr design value <85% any PM 2.5 NAAQS * or no Design Value Available

>1,000,000 3 2

500,000

– <1,000,000 2 1

50,000

– <500,000 1 0

* 85% Annual NAAQS (12 μg/m 3 ) = 10.2 μg/m 3 ; 85% 24

- Hour NAAQS (35 μg/m 3 ) = 29.75 μg/m 3

The required sample collection frequency is based on the type of sampler and the design value calculated from data collected at each FRM (filter

- based) or FEM (continuous) sampler (see Table 4.1

- 2)

. 40 CFR § 5 8.12 (d)(1) states the m anual PM 2.5 sample collection frequency requirement at required SLAMS stations as every third day at sites without a collocated continuously operating PM 2.5 monitor.

Table 4.1

- 2 PM 2.5 Design Values and Sampling Frequencies at ADEQ Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 201 1

- 201 3

24

- Hour Design

Value (μg/m 3 ) 201 1

- 201 3

Annual Design

Value (μg/m 3 ) Sample

Frequency

04

- 003

- 1005 Douglas Red Cross 1 2 6.7 Continuous

04

- 012

- 8000 Alamo Lake 1 N/A 1 N/A 1 Continuous

04

- 013

- 9997 JLG Supersite 2 2 8. 5 Continuous

04

- 023

- 0004 Nogales Post Office 26 9.6 1 in 6 Day

04

- 027

- 8011 Yuma Supersite 2 16 7.8 Continuous

1 PM 2.5 monitoring will beg an on Nov ember 5 , 201 3 and be designated as the Background site for the
PM 2.5 Network

2 Designated Transport site in the PM 2.5 Network



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 16ADEQ currently operates EPA

- approved FEM monitors at six PM 2.5 monitoring sites

. An EPA

- approved FEM monitor w as deployed to the Alamo Lake site in January 2014 ; this site is the designated as the PM 2.5 monitoring network’s Background site

. Yuma Supersite is designated as the required PM 2.5 Tr ansport site

. ADEQ operates both an EPA

- approved FEM continuous monitor and a Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 FRM at the JLG Supersite fulfilling an NCore collocation requirement

. The EPA

- approved FEM sampler is designated the primary PM 2.5 monitor for NAAQS complia nce purposes.

Several non

- FEM continuous PM 2.5 monitors are also in operation throughout the state, most of which are associated with the Smoke Management E

- BAM network

. See Section 2.12 for additional details on the E

- BAM network.

4.1.1 PM 2.5 Collocati on Requirements

For the ADEQ PM 2.5 network, one site is required to have collocated monitoring

. The Nogales Post Office site has the highest PM 2.5 design value in ADEQ’s PM 2.5 network and is therefore the designated PM 2.5 collocated site

. ADEQ operates b oth an EPA

- approved FEM continuous instrument and two Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 FRM instrument s at the Nogales Post Office site

. The FEM BAM 1020 is designated as the primary PM 2.5 monitor for this site , thus enabling ADEQ to exceed the required 1

- in

- 3 day moni toring frequency

. This combination of instruments also fulfills the collocation requirement of the PM 2.5 network for ADEQ

. The QA collocated Partisol
PM 2.5 FRM operates on a 1

- in

- 6 day monitoring frequency rather than the required 1

- in

- 12 day monitoring frequency.

Additionally, ADEQ operates one Partisol 2000 PM 2.5 FRM instrument and one continuous PM 2.5 FEM monitor at the JLG Supersite

. This PM 2.5 FEM is designated the primary instrument as required by NCore

. The PM 2.5 FEM monitor is also labeled as an NCore PM coarse paired monitor

. The PM 2.5 FRM instrument is labeled as a QA collocated instrument for the site

. Table 4.1

- 3 summarizes ADEQ’s PM 2.5 collocation requirements.



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 17Table 4.1

- 3 PM 2.5 FRM/FEM Collocation Details

Method Code (Instrument Type) # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors

143 (Partisol 2000) 2 0 0 0

170 (Met One BAM 1020) 5 5 1 2

4.1.2 Relocating Any Violating PM 2.5 Monitors

ADEQ does not have any violating PM 2.5 monitors th at are being considered for relocation. A process for relocating violating PM 2.5 monitors is required and described in 40 CFR Part 58.10 (c). It requires the annual monitoring network plan to document how state and local agencies provide for the review of changes to a PM 2.5 monitoring network that impact the location of a violating PM 2.5 monitor or the creation/change to a community monitoring zone. The analysis includes a description of the proposed use of spatial averaging for purposes of making comparis ons to the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS as set forth in Appendix N to Part 50. The affected agency must document the process for obtaining public comment and include any comments received through the public notification process within their submitted plan. ADEQ does not intend to establish community monitoring zones as described in the rule or utilize spatial averaging for comparison to the PM 2.5 NAAQS. A public comment procedure is required prior to relocation of a violating monitor and ADEQ will utilize the followi ng procedure:

1. Evaluation of the potential replacement site will include review and comparison of available pollutant data, meteorology, climatology, terrain, and siting characteristics. This information will be documented in a brief report.

2. Make notice of such a change in the annual monitoring network plan.

3. If the change must be accomplished prior to annual monitoring network plan submittal, ADEQ will make appropriate notice via the agency Web page and invite participation from the public prior to relocatio n of the affected site.

4. Relocation of the monitor.

4.2 PM 10 Monitoring Network Requirements

The number of PM 10 samplers required in urban areas is based on the population of the area (see Table 4.2

- 1) and design values for PM 10 24

- hour concentrations (see Table 4.2

- 2)

. Maricopa, Pinal, and Pima Counties have delegated authority for their monitoring networks and AQS reporting

. ADEQ's PM 10 monitoring network includes the MSAs in all other Arizona counties, as well as the PM 10 nonattainment areas in those co unties

. JLG Supersite PM 10 concentrations for NCore are provided by the PM 10 FEM BAM 1020.



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 18Table 4.2

- 1 Minimum Number of PM 10 Monitors Required (40 CFR 58 Appendix D)

MSA Population High Concentration

Exceeds 24

- Hour

NAAQS by 20% or

more (>180μg/m 3 ) Me dium

Concentration

Exceeds 80% of

24

- Hour NAAQS

(>120μg/m 3 ) Low Concentration

Less than 80% of

24

- Hour NAAQS

(<120 μg/m 3 ) or no Design Value

A vailable

>1,000,000 6

- 10 4

- 8 2

- 4

500,000

– <1,000,000 4

- 8 2

- 4 1

- 2

250,000

– <500,000 3

- 4 1

- 2 0

- 1

100,000

– <25 0,000 1

- 2 0

- 1 0

The monitoring rule in 40 CFR Part 58.12(e) states that for PM 10 sites, “...the minimum monitoring schedule for the site in the area of expected maximum concentration shall be based on the relative level of that monitoring site concentration with respect to the 24

- hour standard.” ADEQ has transitioned most PM 10 monitors from filter

- based methods to continuous methods

. By J uly 1, 2014 all the primary PM 10 monitors in the ADEQ PM 10 network will be continuous methods

. Payson Well Site will cont inue as the PM10 collocated filter

- based monitoring station until July 1, 2014

. Table 4.2

- 2 lists the PM 10 network site Design Values and Annual Means

Table 4.2

- 2 PM 10 Design Values (Est imated Exceedances) and Annual Means for ADEQ Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 201 1

- 201 3 Average Estimated Days PM 10 >150 μg/m 3 Including Events 201 1

– 201 3 Average Estimated

Days PM 10 >150 μg/m 3 Excluding Events 201 3 Annual Mean Concentration (μg/m 3 )

04

- 003

- 0011 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 1.0 0 .7 2 0.6

04

- 003

- 1005 Douglas Red Cross 2.0 0 .7 3 7.3

04

- 007

- 0008 Payson We ll Site 0 0 19.1

04

- 007

- 1001 Hayden Old Jail 1.046 1.4 4 2.5

04

- 007

- 8000 Miami Golf Course 0 0* 2 2.6

04

- 012

- 8000 Alamo Lake N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 1



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 1904

- 013

- 9997 JLG Supersite 2.0 0 .7 3 0.5

04

- 015

- 1003 Bullhead City 1.0 0.7 2 0.6

04

- 019

- 0001 Ajo 1.0 1. 7 28.6

04

- 019

- 0020 Rillito 5.044 3.7 4 0.4

04

- 023

- 0004 Nogales Post Office 0* 0* 3 5.8

04

- 023

- 0004 Nogales Post Office 2 1.7 43.7

04

- 027

- 8011 Yuma Supersite 5.011 5.7 4 1.0

* Annual values not meeting completeness criteria

1 Monitoring at Alamo Lake beg a n on Oct.

. 30 , 201 3

4.2.1 PM 10 Collocation Requirements

There are no collocation requirements for EPA

- approved PM 10 FEM monitors

. ADEQ has transitioned the PM 10 network to continuous FEM monitors

. ADEQ does operate an additional Partisol 2000 FRM at the Nogales Post Office site

. While the FEM is designated as the primary PM 10 monitor, the Partisol 2000 monitor is designated a QA collocated PM 10 instrument

. Table 4.2

- 3 summarizes ADEQ’s PM 10 collocation requirements.

Table 4.2

- 3 PM 10 FRM/FEM Collocatio n Details

Method Code # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors

126 (Partisol 2000) 1 0 * 0 * 0 *

079 (TEOM) 8 8 0 0

122 (BAM) 4 4 0 0

* The Partisol 2000 monitors at the Payson Well Site will b e replaced with a single FEM BAM 1020 beginning J uly 2014



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 204.3 O 3 Monitoring Network Requirements

Table 4.3

- 1 Minimum Number of O 3 Monitors Required (40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D)

Population (MSA) Most recent 3 year 8

- hour Design Value ≥ 85% of NAAQS (0.06375 ppm) Most recent 3 year 8

- hour Design Value <85% NAAQS (0.06375 ppm) or no Design Value available

>10 Million 4 2

4

– <10 Million 3 1

350,000

– <4 Million 2 1

50,000

– <350,000 1 0

The mi nimum monitoring requirements for O 3 are shown above in Table 4.3

- 1

. ADEQ operates a network of seven O 3 monitors throughout Arizona (see Table 4.3

- 2)

. ADEQ is updating the O 3 network with remote zero/span/precision checks utilizing the Teledyne T703 UV Photometric O 3 Calibrator with Internal Zero Air Pump and External Zero Air Shut

- Off Valve

. This will allow a ir m onitoring s taff to more efficiently maintain the O 3 network while minimizing travel time during the O 3 season , and avoiding calibration during the peak hours of the day when O 3 levels are highest

. A dditionally, Maricopa, Pima

, and Pinal C ounties operate O 3 monitors

.

Table 4.3

- 2 ADEQ O 3 Sites and Design Values

AQS Site ID Site Current Operating Schedule 201 1

- 201 3 Design Value (ppm)

04

- 005

- 1008 Flagstaff Middle School March

- October 0.069

04

- 007

- 0010 Tonto National Monument March

- October 0.07 5

04

- 012

- 8000 Alamo Lake March

- October 0.072

04

- 013

- 9997 JLG Supersite January

- December 0.07 7

04

- 021

- 8001 Queen Valley March

- October 0.076

04

- 0 25

- 8033 Prescott College AQD March

- October 0.069

04

- 027

- 8011 Yuma Supersite March

- October 0.07 6



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 214.3.1 O 3 Season

In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, Paragraph 4.1(i), “Deviation from the [January

- to

- December] O 3 monitoring season must b e approved by the EPA Regional Administrator, documented in the annual network plan, and updated in AQS

. Information on how to analyze O 3 data to support a change to the O 3 season in support of the 8

- hour standard for a specific state can be found in refe rence 8 to this appendix”

. Reference 8 refers to the Guideline for Selecting and Modifying the Ozone Monitoring Season Based on an 8

- hour Ozone Standard

. In compliance with this document, ADEQ analyzed the most recent seven years of O 3 data (2007

- 201 3 O 3 data from ADEQ sites) to create the chart in Figure 4.3

- 1, which is the basis of ADEQ’s request for modifying the O 3 season to March through October

. The only two days in October > 75 ppb occurred in 2009, which included an unusually high number of excee dance days

. The O 3 season was extended in 2012 to include March because some parts of Arizona begin experiencing low concentrations of O 3 in March

. ADEQ does additional monitoring in the off

- season of November

– February for its own purposes; however, th ose data are not being reported to the AQS database

. The JLG Supersite will continue to operate on a January to December schedule.

Figure 4.3

- 1 Average Number of Days O 3 > 75 ppb all ADEQ Sites Combined

4.4 Pb Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ has op erated three source

- oriented TSP Hi

- Vol Pb monitors between the Globe Highway site (collocated) and the Miami Golf Course site since January 2011

. 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D states that at a minimum, there must be one source

- oriented SLAMS site located to measure the maximum Pb concentration in ambient air

re sulting from each non

- airport source which emits 0.50 or more tons per year and each airport source which emits 1.0 or more tons per year

. Per the National Emissions Inventory (NEI) 2011, there are no non

- airport sources in the 0.5

- 1.0 ton per year category

. For the NCore

- Pb requirement, ADEQ uses the same PM 10 metals speciation sample that is used for the NATTS program

. Eastern Research Group (ERG) currently analyzes these samples and on June 1, 2012 received EPA approval for the ICP

- MS analysis method for lead in PM 10 . No



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 22changes in the actual monitoring or analysis method will occur for Pb

- PM 10 data collected at JLG Supersite; however, parameter code 85129 and method code 202 are now associated wit h these data in AQS.

4.4.1 Pb Collocation Requirements

ADEQ’s Pb network requires only one collocated site

. The Globe Highway site located in Hayden, AZ has the highest design value in the Pb network and is therefore the collocated site

. Although ADEQ mo nitors NCore

- Pb at the JLG Supersite, collocated NCore

- Pb sites are determined by the EPA and JLG Supersite is not a designated NCore

- Pb collocated site

. Table 4.4

- 1 summarizes ADEQ’s Pb collocation requirements.

Table 4.4

- 1 Pb FRM/FEM Collocation Details

Method Code # of Sites # of Primary Monitors # of Required Collocated Monitors # of Active Collocated Monitors

191 (Pb

- TSP ICP/MS) 2 2 1 1

202 (Pb

- PM 10 ICP/MS) 1 1 0 * 0

* Pb

- PM 10 monitor is located at an NCore site and does not require collocation

T abl e 4.4

- 2 Pb Design Values at ADEQ Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 201 1

- 201 3 Design Value (μg/m 3 )

04

- 007

- 1002 Globe Highway 0.27

04

- 007

- 8000 Miami Golf Course 0.06

04

- 013

- 9997 JLG Supersite

-- *

* Design Value not available

4.5 SO 2 Monitoring Network Requi rements

ADEQ operates a network of six SO 2 monitors throughout Arizona

. Authority to operate SO 2 monitors has also been delegated to Maricopa and Pima C ounties

. Additionally, t wo s ources , ASARCO and FMMI
, operate SO 2 monitoring networks in Gila County fo r permit compliance and to support SIP rule requirements

. ADEQ is currently negotiating with both sources to ensure that the monitors are operated under the required quality assurance requirements

. In Miami, ADEQ runs the Miami Ridgeline site and added SO 2 monitors at the Miami Townsite and Jones Ranch sites

, which FMMI has been monitoring

. For Hayden, ADEQ currently operate s a n SO 2 monitor at Hayden Old Jail

. ADEQ initiated discussions with ASARCO regarding Globe Highway and Montgomery Ranch on the be st means to meet the PQAO requirements

. ADEQ also operates a trace

- level SO 2



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 23monitor at its NCore site (JLG Supersite), as required by 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D

. An SO 2 monitor was placed at Alamo Lake in February 2014 and is designated as the background SPM monitor.

The SO 2 monitoring requirements in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a Population Weighted Emissions Index (PWEI) calculated for each CBSA

. CBSAs with PWEIs greater than 5,000 require at least one SO 2 monitor, PWEIs greater than 100,00 0 require a minimum of two SO 2 monitors, and PWEIs greater than 1,000,000 require three SO 2 monitors

. There are no PWEI greater than 5,000 in Arizona, but there are other SO 2 monitors in Arizona

, which are operated by Maricopa County and Pima County.

Ta ble 4.5

- 1 SO 2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 201 1

- 201 3 1

- Hour Design Value (ppb)

04

- 012

- 8000 Alamo Lake N/A

04

- 007

- 0011 Miami Jones Ranch N/A

04

- 007

- 0009 Miami Ridgeline 10 5

04

- 007

- 0012 Miami Townsite N/A

04

- 007

- 1001 Hayden Old Jail 2 66

04

- 013

- 9997 JLG Supersite 6

4.6 NO 2 Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ currently operates only one NO 2 monitor throughout the state of Arizona with one planned to be deployed this year . Th e s e NO 2 monitor s are located at the JLG Supersite and Alam o Lake. JLG is operated to fulfill a PAMS requirement and Alamo Lake is designated as a background SPM site

.

The NO 2 monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D are based on a combination of CBSA population and Annual Average Daily Tr affic (AADT) counts

. The first requirement to be considered is the CBSA population

. CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 are required to operate one near

- roadway monitor, while CBSAs with populations greater than 2.5 million are required to operat e two near

- roadway monitors

. Additionally, CBSAs with populations greater than 500,000 and contain ing roadway segments with 250,000 or greater AADT require two near

- roadway monitors

. As can be seen in table 4.0

- 1, two CBSAs within Arizona (Phoenix and Tu cson Metro areas) contain populations greater than 500,000

, and therefore

, require at least one NO 2 near

- roadway monitor

. The Phoenix CBSA exceeds 2.5 million in population; therefore, two near

roadway monitors are needed in the Phoenix CBSA

. Pima and Ma ricopa Counties will operate the required near

roadway monitors in Tucson and Phoenix

, respectively.

In addition to the near

- roadway monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, there is also a requirement for area

- wide NO 2 monitoring

. CBSAs with populations of one million or more require one NO 2 monitor to measure NO 2 concentrations that represent neighborhood or larger spatial scales

. The Phoenix



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 24metropolitan area is the only area within the state of Arizona that requires ambient mon itoring of NO 2 . The current NO 2 monitors operated by Maricopa and Pima C ounties are meet ing the current monitoring requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D

. ADEQ will continue to monitor NO 2 at JLG Supersite as part of the NO x measurements req uired by the PAMS program

. S ee Table 4.6

- 1 for design values

.

Table 4.6

- 1 NO 2 Design Values at ADEQ Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 201 1

- 201 3

1

- Hour Design

Value (ppb) 201 3 Annual Mean (ppb)

04

- 013

- 9997 JLG Supersite 55 1 6.98

04

- 012

- 8000 Alamo Lake NA NA

4.7 Carbon monoxide ( CO ) Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ operates only one CO monitor throughout Arizona

, with plans to operate a second at Alamo Lake as a background SPM

. Th e current CO monitor is located at the JLG Supersite and has sufficient sens itivity to monitor trace levels

. This CO monitor fulfills NCore as well as PAMS monitoring requirements

. Maricopa and Pima C ounties operate the other required CO monitors within the State of Arizona

. The Phoenix population exceeds the one million popula tion requirement set forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D, therefore one CO monitor is required to be collocated with a near

- road NO 2 monitor

. The required near

- roadway monitor in Phoenix will be operated by Maricopa County

. The most recent census data sho w the Tucson MSA is below one million and therefore near

- road CO monitoring is not required

. The Trace

- Level CO (COTL) analyzer that is currently operated by ADEQ exceeds the minimum monitoring requirements for the NCore and PAMS network design criteria s et forth in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix D

. Due to the low range at which the JLG COTL analyzer operates, ADEQ urges some caution be exercised when utilizing these data for the purpose of NAAQS compliance

. U nder most circumstances

, the data would be used to d etermine compliance with the CO NAAQS

. However, due to the consistently low ambient concentrations, the trace

- level analyzer’s operating range is set at 0

- 5 ppm, which is the range most frequently measured at JLG

. This operating range is well below the CO NAAQS of 9 ppm

, t herefore

, when/if under certain rare circumstances

, the CO concentrations are > 5 ppm , determining compliance with the CO NAAQS may not be possible , because measurement uncertainty increases and becomes challenging to statistically qua ntify

. Table 4.7

- 1 contains the most recent Design Values for CO at JLG Supersite.

Table 4.7

- 1 CO Design Values at ADEQ Sites

AQS Site ID Site Name 201 3 CO 1

- Hour Max. Value (ppm) 201 3 CO 8

- Hour Max. Value (ppm)

04

- 013

- 9997 JLG Supersite 3.239 2.0



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 254.8 PAMS Monitoring Network Requirements

Network design and monitoring requirements for PAMS stations are provided in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D for areas classified as serious, severe, or extreme nonattainment for O 3 . Two sites are required for each area, providi ng all chemical measurements are made

. Measurements include speciated VOCs, Carbonyls, NO x , trace

- level reactive oxides of nitrogen (NO y ), CO, O 3 , surface meteorology, and upper air meteorology

. In 2008, EPA shortened the PAMS monitoring season to June t hrough August.

ADEQ's PAMS network consists of two ambient air monitoring sites in the Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale MSA and a meteorological site for the collection of upper air meteorological data and solar radiation data.

JLG Supersite

– Type 2 PAMS Site

The JLG Supersite was designated a PAMS site in 1999

. Since the required manual method of eight three

- hour canisters running daily is impractical due to increased expenses for staff, shipping, and analysis, ADEQ returned in 2008 to the 2006 monitoring schedu le of a 24

- hour canister sample every sixth day at the JLG Supersite during PAMS season for VOCs

. This will be reviewed when the final results of the PAMS re

- engineering program are available which is anticipated to include recommendations for changes to monitoring and new types of instruments

. ADEQ also operates carbonyl, O 3 , CO, NOx, and surface meteorological monitoring equipment at JLG Supersite (see Table 4.8

- 1)

. Carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite is not currently required for PAMS

, but because ca rbonyls are considered important for PAMS, there are no current plans to discontinue carbonyl monitoring at JLG Supersite.

Table 4.8

- 1 JLG Supersite PAMS Instrumentation

Parameter Period of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration

VOC * Jan

- Dec Canister Sampler Every 6th day, 24 hrs.

Carbonyl * Jan

- Dec Multi

- port Carbonyl Sampler Every 6 th day, 1

- 24 hr sample (Dec

Jan). Every 6 th day, 3

– 3 hr samples (0500

- 0800, 0800

- 1100, 1100

- 1400) (June

- August)

CO Jan

– Dec Trace CO Hourly average

O 3 Jan

– Dec O 3 Analyzer Hourly average

NOx Jan

– Dec NOx Analyzer Hourly average

Meteorology Jan

– Dec • Wind speed/direction

• Temperature

• Relative humidity Hourly average

* 24

- hour VOC and Carbonyl measurements are also part of the NATTS program and collected y ear

- round.



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 26Queen Valley

– Type 3 PAMS Site

Queen Valley was designated a PAMS site in 2001

. The site is located near the southeastern edge of the photochemical modeling grid domain and is considered to be downwind of the source of maximum precursor emiss ions in the Phoenix metropolitan area

. Pollutants collected at the site include speciated PAMS VOCs, O 3 , total reactive NO y , and surface meteorology measurements

. ADEQ’s Five

- Year Network Assessment identified the Queen Valley site as not meeting PAMS mo nitoring requirements due to the lack of meteorological

measurements

. Meteorological instrumentation was added during the second quarter of 2011 and c arbonyl samples are not required at Type 3 sites

. Table 4.8

- 2 lists the instrumentation and monitoring s chedule at the Queen Valley site.

Table 4.8

- 2 Queen Valley PAMS Instrumentation

Parameter Period of Operation Collection Method Frequency and Duration

VOC June

– August Multi

- port sampler Every 6 th day, 24 hrs, and 3

– 3 hr samples (0500

- 0800, 1300

- 1600, 1600

- 1900)

O 3 March

– October O 3 Analyzer Hourly average

NOy June

– August NOy Analyzer Hourly average

Meteorology Jan

– Dec • Wind speed/direction

• Temperature

• Relative humidity Hourly average

Vehicle Emissions Laboratory

– Upper Air Meteorology Site

This site is intended to be a meteorological ‘supersite’ and includes a pyranometer to measure total solar radiation, UV solar radiation, wind speed, wind direction, differential temperature (2 meters and 10 meters), and relative humidity

. The National W eather Service (NWS) site at nearby Sky Harbor Airport collects barometric pressure and precipitation measurements

. A Radio Acoustic Sounding System (RASS) and a W ind P rofiler had also been collecting continuous upper air meteorological data for determina tion of mixing heights since 1998 until July 2012

. The PAMS re

- engineering workgroup noted the high maintenance cost and very l imited use of the RASS and W ind P rofiler data and unofficially recommended against its continued use

– particularly if usable da ta is available from other sources

. ADEQ considered the high o perational cost and very limited data use when deciding to discontinu e its operation

. EPA is currently exploring the possibility of using mixing height data from some of the 1,000 ceilometers recently placed in use by NOAA.



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 27Table 4.8

- 3 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory PAMS Instrumentation

Parameter Period of Operation Method Duration

Meteorology Jan

– Dec • Pyranometer (total solar radiation)

• Ultra

- violet (UV solar)

• Wind speed/direction

• Temperatu re

• Relative humidity Hourly average

4.9 NCore Monitoring Network Requirements

EPA has identified JLG Supersite as the required NCore site for the Phoenix metropolitan area

. JLG Supersite has been a multipollutant monitoring site since its establishment i n 1993

. Currently, several monitoring programs are supported at this site , including: SLAMS, PAMS, NATTS, CSN

, and meteorology

. The required NCore parameters are listed in Table 4.9

- 1

. The r equired NCore monitors were operational by January 1, 2011

. . The NCore

- Pb requirement is being met by using the current Partisol 2000 PM 10 sample filte r) for metals speciation

. ADEQ recently received notice that the ERG analysis method for PM 10 metals speciation was approved as a Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) fo r the analysis of Pb

. While there will be no physical changes to the instrumentation or analysis method for Pb at the NCore site, the parameter code 85129 and method code 202 are

now associated with Pb

- PM 10 data in AQS.

Table 4.9

- 1 JLG Supersite NCore Ins trumentation Required Measurement Frequency/Duration Status



### PM 2.5 

### FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair, designated primary

PM 2.5 

### FRM mass 24 hour average every 3rd day Thermo Partisol 2000 is current instrument; PM 2.5 

### samples collected since 1999

P M 10 

### FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair

PM coarse 

### FEM mass Hourly Met One BAM 1020 FEM pair, difference method

PM 2.5 

### speciation

- organic and elemental carbon, major ions, and trace metals 24 hour average; every 3rd day Met One SuperSASS with URG mo dule is current instrument; STN /CSN samples collected since 1999



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 28

### Pb 24 hour average; every 6th day Currently Pb measurements are from the NATTS PM 10 

### metals sampler. EPA recently approved ERG’s ICP

- MS analysis method as an FEM.

O 3 

### Hourly API Teledyne 400E

CO (Trace Level) Hourly Ecotech EC9830T

SO 2 

### (Trace Level) Hourly Ecotech EC9850T

NO/NO 2 

### /NOx Hourly Ecotech EC9841

NO/NOy Hourly Ecotech EC9843

Surface meteorology Hourly RM Young anemometer, Vaisala temperature/relative humidity probe currently in op eration

4.10 SIP Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ , along with other delegated agencies

, is responsible for the preparation and submittal of SIPs for nonattainment and maintenance areas in Arizona

. ADEQ is responsible for conducting ambient air monito ring for

areas not included with in Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal C ounties or tribal lands

. Permitted sources are also responsible for monitoring air quality, if it is included in their air quality permit

. Some monitoring sites are specifically named in the a rea’s SIP; other monitoring sites are not specifically named, but are representative of the air quality in that SIP area

. Table 4.10

- 1 lists the ADEQ and source

- operated monitors used to determine SIP compliance.

Table 4.10

- 1 SIP Network Monitoring Requi rements

Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites

Phoenix, Maricopa CO Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite

Phoenix, Maricopa O 3 1

- hr Maintenance/Attainment JLG Supersite, Tonto National Monument

Phoenix

- Apache Junction, Maricopa and Pina l O 3 8

- hr “Basic” Nonattainment Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite , Queen Valley, Tonto National Monument

Ajo, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Ajo

Bullhead City, Mohave PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Bullhead City (Post Office)

Douglas

- Paul Spur, Cochise PM 10 Mode rate Nonattainment Douglas Red Cross , Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant

Hayden, Gila and Pinal PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Hayden Old Jail

Miami, Gila PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Freeport McMoRan sites: Golf Course & Miami Ridgeline



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 29Area and County Pollutant Classification ADEQ SIP Sites

Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Nogales Post Office

Payson, Gila PM 10 Maintenance/Attainment Payson Well Site

Phoenix, Maricopa, and Pinal (Apache Junction portion) Phoenix (Salt River Area) PM 10 Serious Nonattainment JLG Supersite

Rillito, Pima PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Rillito

Yuma, Yuma PM 10 Moderate Nonattainment Yuma Supersite

Nogales, Santa Cruz PM 2.5 Nonattainment Nogales Post Office

Ajo, Pima SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment

Douglas, Cochise SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No networ k or commitment

Hayden, Gila and Pinal SO 2 Nonattainment

– Primary ADEQ (SO 2 , MET): Hayden Old Jail

ASARCO (5 SO 2 , 3 MET [no met at Jail or Garfield]): Globe Hwy, Garfield Ave., Montgomery Ranch, Hayden Old Jail, Hayden Junction

Miami, Gila SO 2 Maintenan ce/Attainment ADEQ: Miami Ridgeline

, Miami Jones Ranch, Miami
Townsite

Freeport McMoRan (SO 2 , MET) Miami Jones Ranch,
Miami Townsite

Morenci, Greenlee SO 2 Maintenance/Attainment No network or commitment

San Manuel, Pima and Pinal SO 2 Maintenance/Attainme nt No network or commitment

Regional Haze, 12 Class 1

areas Visibility

Impairing pollutants (VOC, NOx, SO 2 , PM 10 , PM 2.5 , PM 2.5 species) Statewide

– IMPROVE monitors ADEQ Protocol sites: Douglas Red Cross, Organ Pipe
Nat iona l Monument, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley, Saguaro West Nat iona l Monument, Meadview

NPS / USFS sites: Chiricahua Entrance Station, Greer Water Treatment Plant, Grand Canyon

- Indian Gardens, Grand Canyon

- Hance Camp, Ike’s Backbone, Meadview, Petrified Forest National Park, Pleasant Valle y Ranger Station, Saguaro National Park

East, Sycamore Canyon, Tonto National Monument

Note: Sites in italics are specifically required in SIP ; others meet the general SIP requirement that representative monitoring be conducted (no specific monitoring sit es are named in SIP).

4.11 Source Compliance Monitoring Network Requirements

ADEQ requires select major and minor point sources in the state to conduct ambient monitoring for selected pollutants in and around the i r sources

. Some requirements are for preve ntion of significant deterioration (PSD)



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 30monitoring prior to operation of the facility

. Other monitoring requirements are for the duration of the permit or timeframe specified therein

. ADEQ activities have been limited to regular performance audits of in struments at some of these sites and review of ambient monitoring data submitted according to the permit requirements

. Sources are required to review and validate their data and submit quality assurance documents to ADEQ with the data

. Table 4.11

- 1 list s the monitors operated by ADEQ permitted sources.

Any data submitted to AQS needs to be approved by a PQAO that meets EPA’s QA requirements

. Data from the A SARCO and FMMI monitors are being use d for regulatory decisions and will need to be submitted to A QS

. In spring 2012, ADEQ sen t letters to ASARCO and FMMI discuss ing the PQAO requirements and suggesting that they meet with ADEQ to discuss options

. FMMI representatives met with ADEQ, and in January 2013, ADEQ established monitors at the existing FMMI ’s Miami Jones Ranch and Miami Townsite sites in the Miami, AZ

area

.

Table 4.11

- 1 Source Compliance Monitoring Network

Site Name City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal

Globe Highway Winkelman SO 2 No

ASARCO

– Hayden

– Garfield Ave. Hayden SO 2 No

ASARCO

– Montgo mery Ranch Hayden SO 2 No

ASARCO

– Hayden Junction Hayden Junction SO 2 No

Hayden Old Jail 1 Hayden SO 2 No

Chemical Lime Plant Nelson Meteorology No

Drake Cement Sycamore Canyon PM 10 , PM 2.5 mass and ammonium speciation, Meteorology No

FMMI

- Miami Ridge line Miami PM 10 mass and metals speciation Yes (PM 10 mass only)

FMMI

- Miami Golf Course Miami PM 10 mass and metals speciation, collocated Yes (PM 10 mass only)

FMMI

- Miami Jones Ranch 1 Miami SO 2 No

FMMI

- Miami Townsite 1 Miami SO 2 No



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 31Site Name City Pollutant(s) AQS Submittal

PCC

– Clarkdale NW Clarkdale PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology No

PCC

– Clarkdale SE Clarkdale PM 10 mass and metals speciation, Meteorology No

Carlota Mine

– Sanctuary Globe PM 10 , H 2 SO 4 , Meteorology No

1 ADEQ also operates an SO 2 monitor at this site

. The ADEQ data are submitted to AQS while the facility data are not.

4.12 Class 1 Visibility Network

As stated previously, v isibility monitoring networks track impairment in specified national parks and wilderness areas called Class 1 areas based on designat io ns made by the 1977 CAA Amendments

. The evaluation s, performed by the USFS and NPS

, reviewed the wilderness areas of parks and national forests which were designated as wilderness before 1977, were more than 6,000 acres in size, and ha d visual air quality as an important resource for visitors

. Of the 156 Class 1 areas designated across the nation, 12 are located in Arizona.

For the Class 1 area designations, EPA initiated a nationally operated monitoring network in 1987 called the
I nteragency M onitoring of PRO tected V isual E nvironments (IMPROVE) program

. The purpose of th is network is to characterize broad regional trends in visibility conditions using monitoring data collected in or near Class 1

areas across the United States

. Originally, the national IMPROVE network was made up of approximately 30 sites at Class 1 areas

. During 1999

- 2000 the number of sites increased to approximately 110

. ADEQ, Pima County, and federal land managers at Arizona's Class 1 areas cooperatively operate the visibility moni toring network in Arizona

. The current network is described in Table 4.12

- 1

. In addition to the Class 1 IMPROVE monitors listed in Table 4.12

- 1, ADEQ also operates one IMPROVE monitor at the Douglas Red Cross site, and two collocated IMPROVE monitors at the JLG Supersite

. The JLG Supersite serves as an urban IMPROVE monitor and has been used to provide comparative analysis with data from the CSN network

. The Douglas Red Cross site may serve multiple objectives

. In 2012, a review of the data from the D ouglas Red Cross site was prepared by Air Resource Specialists and provided to ADEQ

. These data will be used to evaluate if this site should be continued or if it could be better utilized at another location

. See the IMPROVE map in Appendix B for a spati al representation of the IMPROVE monitoring network and Class 1 areas within the state of Arizona.

Table 4.12

- 1 201 4 Arizona Class 1 Visibility Monitoring Network

Geographic Area Represented Monitoring Location

Background Meadview, Organ Pipe National Mon ument



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 32Chiricahua National Monument, Chiricahua Wilderness Area and Galiuro USFS Wilderness Chiricahua Entrance Station

Grand Canyon National Park Hance Camp

Mazatzal and Pine Mountain USFS Wilderness Ike’s Backbone

Mount Baldy Greer Water Treatment Pl ant

Petrified Forest National Park Petrified Forest

Saguaro National Park East Unit and West Unit

Sierra Ancha USFS Wilderness Pleasant Valley Ranger Station

Superstition USFS Wilderness Tonto National Monument, Queen Valley

Sycamore Canyon USFS Wilde rness Sycamore Canyon (Camp Raymond)

4.13 Urban Haze Monitoring Network

ADEQ began studying the nature and causes of urban haze by conducting studies during the winter of 1989

- 90 in Phoenix and during the winter of 1992

- 93 in Tucson

. These studies recomm ended long

- term, year

- round monitoring of visibility in both areas

. In 1993, ADEQ began deploying visibility monitoring equipment in Phoenix and Tucson

. Executive Order 2000

- 3 directed by the Governor’s Brown Cloud Summit was to establish options for a v isibility standard or other method to track progress in improving visibility in the Phoenix area

. The Summit concluded that a daily visibility index for the metropolitan area should have its characteristics defined through a public survey process

. This p rocess called for a representative cross

- section of residents of Area A (as described in House Bill 2538 , roughly the Phoenix metropolitan area), to determine what visual air qualities are desirable, what visual range is acceptable, and how often the combination of acceptable visual range and air quality is preferred

. Through a series of meetings in 2002 and early 2003, ADEQ and the Visibility Index Oversight Commit tee designed the visibility survey, selected a contractor to conduct the survey, oversaw the completion of the field portion of the survey, and defined a recommended visibility index

. The Visibility Index Oversight Committee Final Report was issued in early 2003 summarizing the visibility index.

Equipment currently used to evaluate urban visibility includes transmissometers, nephelometers, and digital camera systems

. The Phoenix urban haze network consists of a transmissometer for measuring light extinction along a fixed path length of four and a half kilometers, three nephelometers for measuring light scattering, and five digital camera systems to record visual characteristics o f the urban area.

T he Tucson urban haze network was shut down in September 2010

. In early 2011, a draft summary report was written which summarizes the nephelometer and transmissometer data that were collected since 1997

. The report provides summaries a nd trends in urban visibility data, as well as meteorological data summaries in the form of wind roses

. This report is meant to serve as a final data summary for the Tucson Urban Haze network

. Information from this report may be utilized in the future if further modifications are needed to the Urban Haze Network.



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 33The current Phoenix urban haze sites (and their status) are described in Table 4.13

- 1

. ADEQ continues to evaluate the Urban Haze program

. The high

- resolution images from these cameras can be v iewed online at http://www.phoenixvis.net

.

Table 4.13

- 1 Urban Haze Monitoring Network

Site Name Parameter(s) Measured

Phoenix Network

– Operational

ADEQ Building High Resolution Digital Camera

Banner Mesa Medic al Center High Resolution Digital Camera

Dysart Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer

Estrella Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer

Estrella Mountain Community College High Resolution Digital Cameras

JLG Supersite IMPROVE

North Mountain Summit 2 High Resolution Digital Cameras

Phoenix Transmissometer

(Phoenix Baptist Hospital to Holiday Inn Hotel) Transmissometer (Bext)

Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Light Scattering (Bscat) Nephelometer

4.14 Meteorology Monitoring Network

ADEQ operates meteorologic al equipment at selected sites throughout its network; see Table 4.14

- 1

. Some sites were originally established because other meteorology networks (NWS, AZMet, etc.) were not located near ADEQ's ambient air quality sites

. As recommended in ADEQ’s Five

- Ye ar Network Assessment, ADEQ has begun to expand the meteorology monitoring network and standardize the meteorological measurements so that all sites collect measurements of wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and relative humidity

. Currently, Alamo i s the only meteorological site that do es not have the full suite of meteorological instruments

. A temperature and/or RH probe may be added to th is site within the next year to compliment the current measurements of wind speed and wind direction.

Except fo r the items mentioned above

, ADEQ does not have any specific plans to make changes to the meteorological network, but may add additional meteorological equipment at existing SLAMS sites as resources permit

. At this time, ADEQ plans to only submit meteorol ogical data that are required by 40 CFR Part 58.16 to EPA’s AQS database

. If future resources allow additional meteorological data submittals to the AQS database,



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 34ADEQ may do so on a voluntary basis

. A spatial representation of ADEQ’s meteorological moni toring network can be found in Appendix B.

Table 4.14

- 1 Meteorology Monitoring Network

Site Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Wind Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Report to AQS Comments

Alamo Lake X X X No

Ajo X X X No

Douglas Red Cross X X X No

Globe Highway X X X No

Hayden Old Jail X X X No

JLG Supersite X X X Yes For NCore / PAMS support

Miami Golf Course X X X No

Nogales Post Office X X X No

Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant X X X No

Payson Well Site X X X No

Queen Valley X X X Yes For PAMS support

Rillito X X X No

Vehicle Emissions X X X X X X Solar only For PAMS support



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 35Site Temp. Temp. Lapse Rate System Relative Humidity Wind Total Horizontal Solar Radiation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Report to AQS Comments

Laboratory

Yuma Supersite X X X No

5.0 Quality Assurance

To ensure high qualit y data are produced that meet the users’ needs, ADEQ sustains a “quality system” as required by EPA. The U.S. EPA primarily specifies the quality assurance (QA) requirements for operating SLAMS, SPM, CSN, NCore, NATTS, PAMS, and PSD air monitors in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A , the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume II: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program , technical assurance documents (TADs), and other supporting guidance documents. In response, ADEQ develops quality a ssurance plans for air monitoring networks, which provide detailed information regarding the specifics of each air monitoring network and how data will be managed. Components of ADEQ’s quality system include, but are not limited to:

• ADEQ being establish ed as the primary quality assurance organization (PQAO) for the criteria and non

criteria pollutant air monitoring data collected and reported to AQS.

• An agency

- level Quality Management Plan (QMP), which is an “umbrella” document that details, in broad

ter ms, the strategies used to carry out QA/QC in environmental data collection activities

.

• Division

- level quality assurance program plans (QAPPs) with supporting standard operating procedures (SOPs) for each major, ongoing air monitoring network. Each QAPP d escribes:

o Health effects of a specific pollutant and

o Purpose for operating the monitoring station or network

o Data quality objectives (DQOs) and/or measurement quality objectives (MQO) along with data quality indicators (DQIs) that specify the amount of t olerable error in the data using statistical metrics

 ADEQ’s precision and bias results from QC checks such as verifications and performance evaluation (PE) audits apply to ADEQ’s data only while some metrics obtained by the EPA National Performance Evaluat ion Program (NPEP) apply to a specific network at the nationwide level.

o Variety of regularly occurring quality control (QC) checks along with pass/fail criteria

o Types of QA assessments and reports needed from the network,

o Data validation processes and da ta reporting requirements,



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 36o Additional items such as preventative measures taken to reduce data loss, corrective actions, and document control and management.

In addition to QAPP requirements and/or recommendations from the U.S. EPA QA Office and/or OAQPS, the EPA Region 9 QA Office provides additional QAPP requirements for agencies under their jurisdiction that distinguish between the scope of a “program” versus “project” plan. As per EPA Region 9 guidance:

o “Program Plans” describe major air monitoring ne tworks that are essentially “permanent” with no known end dates, and

o “Project Plans” describe the specifications for special air monitoring projects of limited in scope and duration.

Per EPA Region 9 guidance, a draft comprehensive program plan was submitt ed to EPA Region 9 in November 2001, but this document was never approved. This document provided a broad overview of all air monitoring programs AAS operates. This document is being replaced by individual program plans, which provide more details for each major air monitoring program, or network.

All environmental data operations (EDOs) contain some level of uncertainty or error. The total measure of uncertainty is the sum of measurement and population uncertainty. Measurement uncertainty relates to how

ac curately a pollutant’s concentration was measured, or sampled, and occurs during the data collection process. The measurement uncertainty among ADEQ stations monitoring for the same pollutant is expected to be reasonably homogeneous because such stations o perate under a set of common factors needed to effectively operate as a PQAO. Common factors typically include:

• Stations being operated by a common team of field operators and according to a common set of field standard operating procedures (SOPs),

• Common calibration facilities and standards,

• Use of a common quality assurance program/project plan (QAPPs),

• Oversight by a common quality assurance organization, and

• Support by a common management, laboratory, or headquarters.

Population uncertainty relates to h ow well the measurements of a pollutant from a particular air monitoring station represent the population deemed at risk. Population uncertainty is kept within tolerable limits by establishing monitoring sites at the best possible location to achieve the m onitoring objective. The annual network review helps to ensure air monitoring stations remain sited correctly and target the intended population.

5.1 ADEQ Quality Assurance Program and Project Plans

EPA requires PQAOs to update their QAPPs every five year s so they remain current. For specific QA/QC information regarding pollutant measurements, please reference the appropriate QAPP for this information. ADEQ plans on using the pollutant

- specific QAPPs for each parameter measured at the NCore station.

For criteria pollutants, ADEQ has the following QAPPs in

- place:



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 37• A Final Pb QAPP that was approved by Region 9 in January 2013.

• A Final PM QAPP that was approved by Region 9 in August 2013.

o The EPA produces a QAPP for the Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) PM 2. 5 monitoring program and ADEQ plans on adding any supplemental PM speciation air monitoring information as an addendum in 2015.

• A Final O 3 , QAPP that was approved by EPA Region 9 in December 2013.

• A Final SO 2 QAPP that received condition approval by EPA Reg ion 9 in December 2013. ADEQ has been addressing EPA’s comments on this document and the revised Final QAPP will be submitted for approval in May 2014.

• A Final Draft NO 2 QAPP was submitted to EPA Region 9 in March 2014 and approval is outstanding.

• A Fin al Draft CO QAPP is near completion and will be submitted to EPA Region 9 in May or June 2014.

For non

- criteria pollutants, ADEQ has the following QAPPs in

- place:

• A Final National Air Toxics Trends Stations (NATTS), (Urban) Air Toxics Monitoring Program ( ATMP), & Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) QAPP that was approved EPA Region 9 in February 2008

.

o ADEQ is in the process of updating this QAPP and the plan is to separate it into two QAPPs: one for the air toxics network, and one for the P AMS network. ADEQ plan on submitting these revised QAPPs to EPA Region 9 in late 2014 and/or early 2015.

• ADEQ plans on developing a QAPP for the meteorological network and submit it for approval to EPA Region 9 in 2014.

For special projects, ADEQ does not have any active project plans in

- place at this time.

5.2 EPA QA Reports and Network Performance Periodically, EPA publishes reports for some of the criteria pollutant networks, and potentially non

- criteria pollutant networks, that rate and/or rank monito ring organizations’ performance over a three year period. The QA Team, as well as other personnel in DM&QA, review these reports to gauge how well our networks are performing with those across the nation. If needed, corrective actions are taken to ensure d ata of the highest quality possible are collected. ADEQ is monitoring the PM 2.5 network to see how it performs nationally based on the results published in the most recent EPA report, the 3

- Year Quality Assurance Report Calendar Years 2005, 2006, and 2007 The SLAMS PM2.5 Ambient Air Monitoring Program (February 2009).



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 38

## Appendix A

– Definitions and Abbreviations

AAAD Air Assessment Ambient Database

AAS Air Assessment Section

AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic

ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

AFL Air Filter Lab

AMU Air Monitoring Unit

ASARCO American Smelting and Refining Company, LLC

ATEC Atmospheric Technologies, Inc.

Auto GC/MS Automated Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer

AQS Air Quality System (EPA database)

BAM Beta Attenuation Monitor

Be xt Total Light Extinction

Bscat Light Scattering

CAA Clean Air Act

CBSA Core Based Statistical Area

CEDES Commission for Ecology and Sustainable Development

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CO Carbon Monoxide

CSN Chemical Speciation Network

DCS Data Collect ion System

DM&QA Data Management & Quality Assurance Unit

DQO Data Quality Objective

E

- BAM Environment Proof

- Beta Attenuation Monitor

EDO Environmental Data Operation

EPA Environmental Protection Agency



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 39ERG Eastern Research Group, Inc.

FEM Federal Equiva lent Method

FMMI Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc.

FRM Federal Reference Method

HAP Hazardous Air Pollutant

ICP

- MS Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry

IMPROVE I nteragency M onitoring of PRO tected V isual E nvironments

MCAQD Maricopa County Air Qu ality Department

MET Meteorological Measurements (wind, temperature, relative humidity)

MQO Measurement Quality Objective

MSA Metropolitan Statistical Area

μg/m 3 Micrograms per Cubic Meter

NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard

NAREL National Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory

NATA National Air Toxics Assessment

NATTS National Air Toxics Trends Station

NCore National Core multipollutant monitorin g stations

NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology

NM National Monument

NO 2 Nitrogen Dioxide

NOx Nitrogen oxides

NOy Reactive Nitrogen Oxides

NPAP National Performance Audit Program

NPEP National Performance Evaluation Program

NPS National Par k Service

NWS National Weather Service



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 40O 3 Ozone

OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

PAHs Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

PAMS Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station

Pb Lead

PCAQCD Pinal County Air Quality Control District

PDEQ Pima Cou nty Department of Environmental Quality

PE Performance Evaluation

PEP Performance Evaluation Program

PM Particulate Matter

PM 10 Particulate Matter ≤ 10 microns

PM coarse Coarse Particulate Matter between 2.5 to 10 micrometers aerodynamic diameter, may also be denoted as PM 10

- 2.5

PM 2.5 Particulate Matter ≤ 2.5 microns

POC Parameter Occurrence Code

ppb Parts Per Billion

ppm Parts Per Million

PQAO Primary Quality Assurance Organization

PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration

PWEI Populated Weighted Emission s Index

QA Quality Assurance

QAPP Quality Assurance Program Plan

QC Quality Control

QMP Quality Management Plan

RASS Radar Acoustic Sounding System

SEMARNAT Secretariat of Environment and Natural Resources

SIP State Implementation Plan



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 41SLAMS State and Loca l Air Monitoring Stations

SO 2 Sulfur Dioxide

SOP Standard Operating Procedure

SPM Special Purpose Monitor

SRO Southern Regional Office

STN Speciation Trends Network

TAD Technical Assistance Document

TEOM Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance

TSA Technic al System Audit

USFS United States Forest Service

VOC Volatile Organic Compound



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 42

## Appendix B

– Network Maps

There are ten maps in this section illustrating the location of ADEQ and Source monitors:

• CO Network

• NO 2 

### Network

• O 3 

### Network

• SO 2 

### Network

• Pb Network

• PM 10 

### Network

• PM 2.5 

### Network

• Meteorological Network

• Urban Visibility Network

• IMPROVE Network & Class I Wilderness areas

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 43

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 44

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 45

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 46

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 47

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 48

### t

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 49

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 50

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 51

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 52

### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 53

## Appendix C

– Current Monitors by Program or Network

This appendix contains detailed information about monitors that are operated by ADEQ, or monitors that ADEQ has a strong association with (e.g. IMPROVE monitors) . Only those monitors that are in operati o n at the time that this network plan was created are included in this appendix. Monitors that are proposed to be installed or those that were discontinued prior to the creation of this network plan are not included in this appendix. Since individual pollut ants or networks have specific monitoring or siting criteria, this appendix was created so that siting criteria can be easily identified and evaluated throughout a program or network. See Appendix D f or detailed information on specific monitoring sites.

N ON

- REGULATORY NETWORKS Mete o ro logy Temp/RH

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 5 7 Wind

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 59 S pecial P urpose M onitors (SPM)

................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 6 1

NAAQS

- RELATED NETWORKS S tate & L ocal A ir M onitoring S tations (SLAMS) CO

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 6 2 NO 2 ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 6 3 O 3 ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 6 4 SO 2 ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 6 5 Pb

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . 6 6 PM 10 ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 6 7 PM 2.5 ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 69 Chemical Speciation Network (CSN)

................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 7 0 National Core Multi

- Polluta n t Monitoring Stations (NCore)

................................ ................................ ............ 7 1 Photochemical Assessme nt Monitoring Stations (PAMS)

................................ ................................ ................ 7 3

AIR TOXICS N ational A ir T oxics T rends S ites (NATTS)

................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 7 6 U rban A ir T oxics M onitoring P rogram (UATMP)

................................ ................................ ............................ 7 7

VISIBILITY Urban Haze Camera

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 7 8 Nephelometer

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 79 Transmissometer

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 8 0 Temp/RH

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 8 1 I nteragency M onitoring of Protected V isual E nvironments (IMPROVE)

................................ ......................... 8 2



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014 , Page 54

### Definitions for Appendix C

– Current Monitors by Program or Network

Local Site Name Official name for the site as writt en in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD database Pollutant (POC) The pollutant(s) or parameter(s) being collected or measured at the site and the POC is the Primary Occurrence Code for the instrument , as it is in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD Parameter c ode The AQS code rep resenting a specific pollutant being measured or monitored Basic m onitoring o bjective Purpose of monitoring for the parameter at the site ( Public Information, NAAQS Comparison

, or Research) Site type(s) A brief description of the intended purpose of the monitor’s measurements ( E xtreme D ownwind, H ighest Concentration, M ax O zone C oncentration, M ax P recursor I mpact, Population E xposure, Source O riented, U pwind B ackground, General / Background, Regional Transport, Welfare

- Related Impacts, Quality Assurance, o r Other ) Monitor t ype(s) The associated monitoring network for the monitor ( IMPROVE, Index S ite, Industrial, NATTS, NCore, N on

- EPA Federal, PAMS, Proposed NCore, QA Collocated, SLAMS, Special Purpose, Supplemental Speciation, Trends Speciation, Tribal Mon itor, Unofficial PAMS) Instrument manufacturer and model The specific make and model of the monitor or instrument used in the network

Method code The AQS code representing the particular method for collecting samples of the specified instrument FRM/FEM/ ARM/other Denotes if the instrument is a Federal Reference Method, Federal Equivalency Method, Approved Regional Method (for continuous PM 2.5 only) , or other

ac cording to the Federal Registry Collecting Agency Name of agency collecting data Analytical La b (weight, toxics, other) Name of laboratory performing sample analysis

Reporting Agency Name of agency reporting the data Spatial scale (micro, neighborhood) Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0

– 100 m, middle scale: 0.1

– 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5

– 4 km, urban: 4

– 50 km, regional: ~50

– 500 km, or national/global) Monitor ing start date (MM/DD/YYYY) Date that the monitor was started at the site

Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous ) Frequency the instrument collects sample s or measurements (e.g. hourly, daily, 1 : 3, 1 : 6, etc.) Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) Theoretical frequency for p articular m atter instrument based on Ratio to Standard Figure in 40CFR Part 58.12 (e.g. hourly, daily, 1 : 3, 1 : 6) Sampling season ( MM/DD

MM/DD) Period that the instrument collects samples or measurements throughout a given year (expressed as a range of months) Probe height (meters) Distance the probe is from the ground in meters (O 3 and SO 2 probes must be between 2 and 15 meters; oth ers pollutants must be between 2 to 7 meters; meteorology typically 2 or 10 meters) Distance from supporting structure (meters) For rooftop probe (s) only. The separation distance is in reference to walls, parapets , or penthouses located on roof Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) Distance the instrument inlet is from the closest obstruction on the roof in meters (probes and inlets must be at least 1 meter from obstructions) Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) Distance the instrument i nlet is from the closest obstruction not on the roof in meters (probes and inlets must be at least 1 meter from obstructions) Distance from trees (meters) Distance the instrument inlet is from the nearest tree in meters (must be a



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014 , Page 55minimum of 10 meters fro m drip line) Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) Height the obstruction is above the inlet (distance from the obstruction to the inlet must be at least 2x the height that the obstacle protrudes above the inlet)

. Trees can be considered obstructions de pending on density of foliage, therefore the same obstruction requirements apply to trees Tree Height above Probe (meters) Height the tree is above the inlet. Trees that are within 10 meters of inlet may not cause issue if the tree height is at or belo w the inlet height. Furthermore, as trees grow they may become obstructions, therefore it is important to capture the height of trees Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) Distance the instrument inlet is from the nearest furnace or incinerat or flue in meters ( for Pb and SO 2 ; designed to avoid undue influences from minor

sources ) Distance between collocated monitors (meters) Distance between the centers of collocated instruments in meters (must be between 1 and 4 meters) Unrestricted airflow (degrees) Angular measure (in degrees) of the area around an instrument that is free from obstructions (minimum of 180°) Restricted airflow (degrees) Direction the airflow is restricted in degrees as they are associated with the cardinal directions (i.e. 90o = E) (must not be in the direction of the prevailing winds) Prevailing wind direction (degrees) Direction the wind predominately comes from in degrees during the season of greatest pollutant concentration . Used to determine if restricted airflow is in the direction of the prevailing wind. Probe material for reactive
gases Type of material probe is made of (SO 2 , NO 2 , O 3 must have FEP Teflon or borosilicate glass; PAMS and VOCs must be borosilicate glass or stainless steel) Residence time for reacti ve gases (seconds) Number of seconds it takes a sample of air to travel from the inlet to the instrument (reactive gases must be less than 20 seconds) Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Are there any planned changes to the monitoring in the next 18 months? ( Y or N ) Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Are the data being compared against the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS standards? ( Y or N) Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Frequency at which flow rate verifications occur for manual particulate matter and lead instrument s (daily, weekly, bi

- weekly, monthly)

Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Frequency at which flow rate verifications occur for automated particulate
matter instrument (daily, weekly, bi

- w eekly, monthly)

Frequency of one

- point QC check gaseous instruments Frequency at which zero/span/precision checks occur for gaseous instruments (daily, weekly, bi

- weekly, monthly) Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters Date the last Performance Eva luation audit was performed on the gaseous instrument. (SO 2 , NO 2 , O 3 , CO, etc.) (MM/DD/YYYY) Last two semi

- annual flow rate audits PM and Pb Dates of the last two audits on the p articulate m atter and lead instrument s flow
rate. (MM/DD/YYYY, MM/DD/YYYY)



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014 , Page 56State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 57 Local Site Name Ajo Douglas Red Cross Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course Nogales Post Office
Pollutant (POC) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Parameter code 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 Basic monitoring objective

-- -- -- -- -- -- --

Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Highest Concentration, Source Oriented Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure
Monitor type(s)

-- -- -- -- -- -- --

Instrument manufacturer and model Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Method code 040 040 040 040 040 040 040 FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 02/11/2014 08/16/2012 04/15/2011 02/02/2011 07/01/1993 06/08/2011 08/11/2011 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 2.3 2 2 2.1 2 2 5.2 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.2

-- -- 0.5

-- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- 4

-- -- Distance from trees (meters) 14 13 3.6 12 4 6 5 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- 5.5

-- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 270 150 330 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- 250-340 140-350 310-350

-- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Temp/RHState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 58 Local Site Name Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Queen Valley Rillito Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Yuma Supersite

Pollutant (POC) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp/RH (1) Temp R/H (1) Temp/RH (1)
Parameter code 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 Basic monitoring objective

-- -- -- -- -- --

Site type(s) Source Oriented Population Exposure Downwind Source Oriented Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- -- -- -- -- --

Instrument manufacturer and model Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 45C Probe Vaisala HMP 45C Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe
Method code 040 040 040 040 040 040
FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- -- -- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Middle Neighborhood Regional Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 12/01/2011 05/30/1991 06/23/2003 03/30/2010 05/11/1999 03/17/2010 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 2 2 2.6 2.4 4.5 2 Distance from supporting structure (meters)

-- -- 1/0/1900

-- -- 1 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- 5

-- -- -- 1 Distance from trees (meters) 9 1 1.2 19 10

-- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 250 180 290 360 270 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- 90-270 35-105

-- 0-90 Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- --

Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments

-- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- -- -- -- -- -- Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Temp/RH continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 59 Local Site Name Ajo Douglas Red Cross Globe Highway Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course Nogales Post Office
Pollutant (POC) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Parameter code 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 Basic monitoring objective

-- -- -- -- -- -- --

Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Highest Concentration, Source Oriented Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure
Monitor type(s)

-- -- -- -- -- -- --

Instrument manufacturer and model RM Young 5305 Anemometer RM Young 5305 Anemometer RM Young 5305 Anemometer RM Young 5305 Anemometer RM Young 5305 Anemometer RM Young 5305 Anemometer RM Young 5305 Anemometer Method code 020 020 020 020 020 020 020 FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1969 08/06/2012 04/15/2011 02/02/2011 07/01/1993 06/08/2011 01/01/1980 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 10 10 10 10 11.5 10.5 12 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) 14 13

-- -- -- -- -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - WindState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 60 Local Site Name Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Queen Valley Rillito Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Yuma Supersite

Pollutant (POC) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Wind (1) Parameter code 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 61103, 61104 Basic monitoring objective

-- -- -- -- -- --

Site type(s) Source Oriented Population Exposure Downwind Source Oriented Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- -- -- -- -- --

Instrument manufacturer and model RM Young 5305 Anemometer RM Young 5103 Anemometer RM Young 5103 Anemometer RM Young 5305 Anemometer RM Young 5305 Anemometer RM Young 5305 Anemometer Method code 020 020 020 020 020 020 FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- -- -- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Middle Neighborhood Regional Middle Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 12/01/2011 05/30/1991 06/23/2003 01/08/2004 05/11/1999 03/17/2010 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/32 Probe height (meters) 10 10 9 10.4 10 10 Distance from supporting structure (meters)

-- -- 6.5

-- -- 6.3 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- 30

-- Distance from trees (meters) 35 2

-- 20 50

-- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 270 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- -- -- -- -- -- Non-Regulatory - Meteorology - Wind continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 61 Local Site Name Flagstaff Middle School Payson Well Site Prescott College AQD Sedona Fire Station AQD Pollutant (POC) PM 2.5 (1) PM 2.5 (1) PM 2.5 (1) PM 2.5 (1)
Parameter code

-- -- -- -- Basic monitoring objective Public Information Public Information Public Information Public Information

Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Population E xposure Population E xposure Monitor type(s) Special Purpose Special Purpose Special Purpose Special Purpose
Instrument manufacturer and model Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM Met One E-BAM
Method code

-- -- -- -- FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 09/09/1999 05/16/2012 07/13/2011 12/16/2011 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 6 2 6 3.6 Distance from supporting structure (meters)

-- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 15

-- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- 6

-- 3 Distance from trees (meters) 15 4

-- -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 270 90 360 300 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) N N N N Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- -- -- -- Non-Regulatory - SPMState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 62 Local Site Name JLG Supersite Pollutant (POC) CO (1)
Parameter code 42101

Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison

Site type(s) Highest Concentration

Monitor type(s) SLAMS, NCore, PAMS
Instrument manufacturer and model Ecotech EC9830T
Method code 588
FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM Collecting Agency ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- Reporting Agency ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4.1 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 Distance from trees (meters) 10 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- Probe material for reactive gases Glass, Teflon Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) 1.94 Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Bi-Weekly
Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters 02/28/2014
Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- NAAQS - SLAMS - COState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 63 Local Site Name JLG Supersite Pollutant (POC) NO 2 (1)

Parameter code 42602

Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison

Site type(s) Highest Concentration Monitor type(s) SLAMS
Instrument manufacturer and model Ecotech EC9841B
Method code 074
FRM/FEM/ARM/other FRM Collecting Agency ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- Reporting Agency ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4.1 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 Distance from trees (meters) 10 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- Probe material for reactive gases Glass, Teflon Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) 1.94 Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Bi-Weekly
Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters 02/27/2014
Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- NAAQS - SLAMS - NO 2State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 64 Local Site Name Alamo Lake Flagstaff Middle School JLG Supersite Prescott College AQD Queen Valley Tonto National Monument Yuma Supersite
Pollutant (POC) O 3 (1) O 3 (1) O 3 (1) O 3 (1) O 3 (1) O 3 (1) O 3 (1)
Parameter code 44201 44201 44201 44201 44201 44201 44201

Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison

Site type(s) Regional Transport Max O 3 Concentration Max O 3 Concentration Max O 3 Concentration Downwind Downwind Max O 3 Concentration

Monitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS, NCore, PAMS SLAMS SLAMS, PAMS SLAMS SLAMS

Instrument manufacturer and model Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E Teledyne API 400E

Method code 087 087 087 087 087 087 087 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Regional Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 05/20/2005 03/13/2008 07/01/1993 03/25/2008 01/01/1998 05/22/2002 05/06/2008 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 01/01-12/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 03/01-10/31 Probe height (meters) 5.5 10 4.1 6 4.5 5 4.3 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2 2 1.2 1.5 2 2 1.6 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- 4

-- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- 10 17

-- -- Distance from trees (meters) 12 15 10

-- -- 6 -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- 3.4

-- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- 3.4

-- -- 0

-- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases Teflon Teflon Glass, Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) 2.91 8.66 1.94 3.87 3.56 3.53 2.98 Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly
Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters 08/20/2013 06/19/2013 03/21/2014 06/04/2013 08/21/2013 07/24/2013 05/09/2013
Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- NAAQS - SLAMS - O 3State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 65 Local Site Name Alamo Lake Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Jones Ranch Miami Ridgeline Miami Townsite Pollutant (POC) SO 2 (1) SO 2 (1) SO 2 (1) SO 2 (1) SO 2 (1) SO 2 (1)
Parameter code 42401 42401 42401 42401 42401 42401

Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS C omparison NAAQS C omparison NAAQS C omparison NAAQS C omparison NAAQS C omparison

Site type(s) Background Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented Source Oriented Source Oriented
Monitor type(s) SPM SLAMS SLAMS, NCore SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS
Instrument manufacturer and model Ecotech EC9850T Ecotech EC9850T Ecotech EC9850T Ecotech EC9850T Thermo 43C Ecotech EC9850T
Method code 592 592 592 592 060 592 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/14/2014 01/01/1975 03/03/2005 02/01/2013 10/05/1995 02/01/2013 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 5.5 4.7 4.1 3.5 3.5 3.7 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2 2.1 1.2 1 1.1 1 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- -- 10 -- 10 26.4 Distance from trees (meters)

-- 12 10 -- -- 10.9 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- 3.4

-- 1.5 14 Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- 3.4

-- -- 7 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- 280

-- 3081 1411 2300 Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases Teflon Teflon Glass, Teflon Teflon Teflon Teflon Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) 3.72 4.75 1.94 4.08 4.88 3.96 Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly
Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters 02/19/2014 02/04/2014 03/07/2014 08/27/2013 05/15/2013 12/10/2013
Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- -- -- -- -- -- NAAQS - SLAMS - SO 2State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 66 Local Site Name Globe Highway Globe Highway JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course Pollutant (POC) Pb (1) Pb (2) Pb-PM10 (1) Pb (1)
Parameter code 14129 14129 85129 14129

Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison

Site type(s) Highest Concentration, Source Oriented Highest Concentration, Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented

Monitor type(s) SLAMS QA Collocated SLAMS, NCore SLAMS

Instrument manufacturer and model Tisch TE-8550-BL TSP Tisch TE-8550-BL TSP Thermo Partisol 2000 Tisch TE-8550-BL TSP
Method code 191 191 202 191 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) PCRWRD PCRWRD ERG PCRWRD Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ERG ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 10/01/2010 10/01/2010 01/01/2005 10/01/2010 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) 1:6 1:6 1:6 1:6 Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 2 2 4.7 3 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.1 1.1 2 1.1 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 65 65 9.1

-- Distance from trees (meters) 3 3 9.1 7 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 23 23 2.8

-- Tree Height above Probe (meters) -1 -1 2.8 1 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters) 1043 1043

-- 2635 Distance between collocated monitors (meters) 2.7 2.7

-- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters -- -- -- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb 11/05/2013, 02/07/2014 11/05/2013, 02/07/2014 02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 11/05/2013, 02/26/2014 NAAQS - SLAMS - PbState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 67 Local Site Name Ajo Alamo Lake Bullhead City Douglas Red Cross Hayden Old Jail JLG Supersite Miami Golf Course

Pollutant (POC) PM 10 (3) PM 10 (3) PM 10 (3) PM 10 (3) PM 10 (3) PM 10 (3) PM 10 (3)
Parameter code 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102

Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison

Site type(s) Population Exposure Background Population Exposure Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented
Monitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS

Instrument manufacturer and model Thermo TEOM 1400AB Met One BAM 1020 Thermo TEOM 1400AB Thermo TEOM 1400AB Thermo TEOM 1400AB Met One BAM 1020 Thermo TEOM 1400AB
Method code 079 122 079 079 079 122 079
FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 02/11/1991 10/30/2013 11/05/1997 09/02/1998 01/06/1981 07/01/1993 7/26/2012 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:6 1:6 1:2 1:6 Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 2.9 4.7 5 3 4.6 4.9 4 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.8 2.1 2 2 2 2.5 2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- -- 10

-- 7

-- Distance from trees (meters) 12

-- 23 11 12 7 6 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- 1

-- 2.6

-- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- 2.9 0 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb 05/08/2013, 10/22/2013 02/19/2014, - 06/04/2013, 12/11/2013 07/31/2013, 01/29/2014 08/07/2013, 02/04/2014 02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 07/26/2013, 02/26/2014 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM 10State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 68 Local Site Name Nogales Post Office Nogales Post Office Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant Payson Well Site Rillito Yuma Supersite

Pollutant (POC) PM 10 (3) PM 10 (1) PM 10 (3) PM 10 (3) PM 10 (3) PM 10 (3)
Parameter code 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102 81102

Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison

Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure Source Oriented Population Exposure Monitor type(s) SLAMS QA Collocated SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS

Instrument manufacturer and model Met One BAM 1020 Thermo Partisol 2000 Thermo TEOM 1400AB Met One BAM 1020 Thermo TEOM 1400AB Thermo TEOM 1400AB
Method code 122 126 079 122 079 079
FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FRM FEM FRM FEM FEM Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- ADEQ AFL

-- ADEQ AFL

-- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Middle Neighborhood Middle Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/01/1980 01/01/1980 01/06/1991 01/01/1991 01/03/1985 12/01/2009 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous 1:6 Continuous Continous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) 1:1 1:1 1:2 1:6 1:6 1:6 Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 8 7.3 3 4.75 4.3 4.5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2.7 2 2 2.1 2 1.8 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 11 15

-- -- -- --

Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) -- -- 3

-- Distance from trees (meters) 10 10 35 17.4 20

-- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 2 2.7

-- -- 0

-- Tree Height above Probe (meters) 0 0

-- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters) 3 3

-- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N Y N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- Monthly

-- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Monthly

-- Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb 08/10/2013, 01/28/2014 08/10/2013, 01/28/2014 07/31/2013, 01/29/2014 05/22/2014, - 06/12/2013, 11/26/2013 05/09/2013, 10/22/2013 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM 10 continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 69 Local Site Name Alamo Lake Douglas Red Cross JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Nogales Post Office Nogales Post Office Nogales Post Office Yuma Supersite
Pollutant (POC) PM 2.5 (3) PM 2.5 (3) PM 2.5 (3) PM 2.5 (1) PM 2.5 (3) PM 2.5 (1) PM 2.5 (2) PM 2.5 (3)
Parameter code 88101 88101 88101 88101 88101 88101 88101 88101

Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison

Site type(s) Background Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Highest Concentration Highest Concentration Highest Concentration Regional Transport
Monitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS, NCore SLAMS, NCore SLAMS QA Collocated QA Collocated SLAMS

Instrument manufacturer and model Met One BAM 1020 Met One BAM 1020 Met One BAM 1020 Thermo Partisol 2000 Met One BAM 1020 Thermo Partisol 2000 Thermo Partisol 2000 Met One BAM 1020

Method code 170 170 170 143 170 143 143 170 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FRM FEM FRM FRM FEM Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- ADEQ AFL

-- ADEQ AFL ADEQ AFL

-- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 11/15/2013 11/02/2000 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 04/01/1999 04/01/1999 04/01/1999 01/01/2010 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:3 Continuous 1:6 1:6 Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4.8 3 5 4.7 8.3 7.3 7.3 4.6 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2.2 2.5 2.5 2 3 2 2 1.9 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- 12 9 8 -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- 10 8 7.6 -- Distance from trees (meters)

-- 11 8 7.6 10 10 10

-- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- 2.5 2.8 1.7 2.7 2.7

-- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- 2.5 2.8 0 0 0

-- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- 3 3, 2 2

-- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- 180 180 180

-- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- Monthly

-- Monthly Monthly

-- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Monthly Monthly Monthly

-- Monthly

-- -- Monthly
Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb 02/19/2014, - 07/31/2013, 01/29/2014 05/29/2013, 11/19/2013 02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 08/01/2013, 01/28/2014 08/01/2013, 01/28/2014 08/01/2013, 01/28/2014 05/29/2013, 10/22/2013 NAAQS - SLAMS - PM 2.5State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 70 Local Site Name JLG Supersite JLG Supersite

Pollutant (POC) PM 2.5 Speciation (7) PM 2.5 Speciation (7)

Parameter code Multiple Multiple Basic monitoring objective Research Research

Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure

Monitor type(s) Supplemental Speciation, NCore Supplemental Speciation, NCore

Instrument manufacturer and model Met One SuperSASS URG 3000N

Method code Various Various FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) RTI RTI Reporting Agency RTI RTI Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) 1:3 1:3 Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4.7 4.9 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2 2.2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 11 12 Distance from trees (meters) 11 12 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 2.6 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 2.6 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers Monthly Monthly
Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb 09/18/2013, 11/19/2013 09/12/2013, 11/19/2013 NAAQS - CSNState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 71 Local Site Name JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Pollutant (POC) CO (1) NOy (1) O 3 (1) SO 2 (1) Pb-PM10 (1) PM 10-2.5 (1)
Parameter code 42101 42600 44201 42401 85129 86101

Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS C omparison NAAQS C omparison NAAQS C omparison NAAQS C omparison Research

Site type(s) Highest Concentration Population Exposure Max O 3 Concentration Population Exposure Population Exposure Population E xposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS, NCore, PAMS NCore SLAMS, NCore, PAMS SLAMS, NCore SLAMS, NCore NCore

Instrument manufacturer and model Ecotech EC9830T Ecotech 9843 Teledyne API 400E Ecotech EC9850T Thermo Partisol 2000 Met One BAM 1020

Method code 588 591 087 592 202 185
FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- ERG

-- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ERG ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 01/01/2011 07/01/1993 03/03/2005 01/01/2005 11/10/2010 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4.1 10 4.1 4.1 4.7 4.9 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.2 7 1.2 1.2 2 2.5 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10

-- 10 10 9.1 7.6 Distance from trees (meters) 10 10 10 9.1 7.6 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 3.4

-- 3.4 3.4 2.8 2.6 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 3.4

-- 3.4 3.4 2.8 2.6 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon

-- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) 1.94 14.39 1.94 1.94

-- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- Monthly
Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly

-- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters 02/28/2014 02/27/2014 03/21/2014 02/27/2014

--

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- -- -- 02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 NAAQS - NCoreState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 72 Local Site Name JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite

Pollutant (POC) PM 2.5 (3) PM 2.5 (1) PM 2.5 Speciation (7) PM 2.5 Speciation (7) Temp/RH (1) Wind (1)

Parameter code 88101 88101 Multiple Multiple 62101, 62201 61103, 61104

Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS C omparison Research Research

-- --

Site type(s) Population Exposure Population E xposure Population E xposure Population E xposure Population E xposure Population E xposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS, NCore SLAMS, NCore Supplemental Speciation, NCore Supplemental Speciation, NCore -- --

Instrument manufacturer and model Met One BAM 1020 Thermo Partisol 2000 Met One SuperSASS URG 3000N Vaisala HMP 155 Probe RM Young 5305 Anemometer
Method code 170 143 Various Various 040 020
FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FRM

-- -- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- ADEQ AFL RTI RTI

-- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ RTI RTI ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous 1:3 1:3 1:3 Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1) 1:3 1:3

-- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 5 4.7 4.7 4.9 2 11.5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2.5 2 2 2 1 7 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 8 7.6 11 12 4

-- Distance from trees (meters) 8 7.6 11 12 4 4 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.6 5.5

-- Tree Height above Probe (meters) 2.5 2.8 2.8 2.6 5.5

-- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 150 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) Y Y

-- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- Monthly Monthly Monthly

-- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers Monthly

-- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb 5/13/2013, 11/19/2013 02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 11/19/2013, 03/13/2014 11/19/2013, 03/13/2014 -- -- NAAQS - NCore continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 73 Local Site Name JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Pollutant (POC) CO (1) NOx (1) O 3 (1) Carbonyl (30,31) Carbonyl (32) VOC (6)
Parameter code 42101 42603 44201 Multiple Multiple Multiple

Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison Research NAAQS Comparison Research Research Research

Site type(s) Highest Concentration Population Exposure Max O 3 Concentration Max Precursor Impact QA Collocated Max Precursor Impact

Monitor type(s) SLAMS, NCore, PAMS PAMS SLAMS, NCore, PAMS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS

Instrument manufacturer and model Ecotech EC9830T Ecotech EC9841B Teledyne API 400E ATEC 8000 ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200

Method code 588 090 087 202 202 126 FRM/FEM/ARM/other FEM FEM FEM

-- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- ERG ERG ERG Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ERG ERG ERG Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 NATTS not PAMS 1:6 Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31 Probe height (meters) 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.7 4.7 4.7 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.2 1.2 1.2 2 2 2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 10 10 6 6 6 Distance from trees (meters) 10 10 10 6 6 6 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 3.4 3.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 3.4 3.4 3.4 2.8 2.8 2.8 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Residence time for reactive gases (seconds) 1.94 1.94 1.94

-- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly

-- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters 02/28/2014 02/27/2014 03/21/2014

-- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- -- -- -- -- -- NAAQS - PAMSState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 74 Local Site Name JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Queen Valley Queen Valley Queen Valley Pollutant (POC) VOC (7) Temp/RH (1) Wind (1) O 3 (1) NOy (1) VOC (6)
Parameter code Multiple 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 44201 42600 Multiple

Basic monitoring objective Research

-- -- NAAQS Comparison Research Research

Site type(s) QA Collocated Population Exposure Population Exposure Downwind Downwind Downwind
Monitor type(s) PAMS, NATTS

-- -- SLAMS, PAMS PAMS PAMS

Instrument manufacturer and model ATEC 2200 Vaisala HMP 155 Probe RM Young 5305 Anemometer Teledyne API 400E Thermo 42C TL Reactive ATEC 8001

Method code 126 040 020 087 574 126 FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- -- FEM FEM

-- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) ERG

-- -- -- -- ERG Reporting Agency ERG ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Regional Regional Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 05/15/1999 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 01/01/1998 01/01/1998 05/20/2001 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) NATTS not PAMS Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous 1:6 Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 06/01 - 08/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 03/01-10/31 06/01-08/31 06/01-08/31 Probe height (meters) 4.7 2 11.5 4.5 5.1 4.5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2 1 7 2 2.6 2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 6 4

-- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) 6 4 4

-- -- -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 5.5

-- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 5.5

-- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 150 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- 140-350

-- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases Stainless Steel

-- -- Glass, Teflon Glass, Teflon Stainless Steel Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- 3.56 13.8

-- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- Bi-Weekly Bi-Weekly

-- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- 08/21/2013 08/21/2013

-- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- -- -- -- -- -- NAAQS - PAMS continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 75 Local Site Name Queen Valley Queen Valley Vehicle Emissions Lab Vehicle Emissions Lab Vehicle Emissions Lab Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Vehicle Emissions Laboratory

Pollutant (POC) Temp/RH (1) Wind (1) Delta Temp (1) Horizontal Solar Raditation (1) Ultraviolet Solar Radiation (1) Temp R/H (1) Wind (1)

Parameter code 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 62101, 61202 63301 63302, 63304 62101, 62201 61103, 61104 Basic monitoring objective

-- -- Research Research Research

-- --

Site type(s) Downwind Downwind Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- -- PAMS PAMS PAMS

-- --

Instrument manufacturer and model Vaisala HMP 45C Probe RM Young 5103 Anemometer RM Young 7627 Li-Cor 200S2 Epply TUVR UV Rotronics MP101A Probe RM Young 5305 Anemometer Method code 040 020 810 011 011 040 020 FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 06/23/2003 06/23/2003 08/20/2004 06/18/1999 08/20/2004 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 2.6 9 2.5 - 10 5 5 4.5 10 Distance from supporting structure (meters) .5 6.5 .5

-- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- 30 Distance from trees (meters)

-- -- 10 10 10 10 50 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 180 360 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- -- -- -- -- -- NAAQS - PAMS continuedState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 76 Local Site Name JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite JLG Supersite

Pollutant (POC) Carbonyl (6) Carbonyl (7) VOC (6) VOC (7) SVOC (6) PM 10 metals speciation (1) Parameter code Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Basic monitoring objective Research Research Research Research Research Research

Site type(s) Population Exposure QA Collocated Population Exposure QA Collocated Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s) PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS NATTS NATTS

Instrument manufacturer and model ATEC 8000 ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200 ATEC 2200 Tisch PUF+ Thermo Partisol 2000
Method code 202 202 101 101 118 202
FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- -- -- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG Reporting Agency ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG ERG Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 06/06/2001 06/06/2001 07/08/2007 01/01/2005 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) 1:6 Every other month 1:6 Every other month 1:6 1:6 Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.1 4.7 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 2 2 2 2 1.1 2 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 6 6 6 6 4.5 9.1 Distance from trees (meters) 6 6 6 6 4.5 9.1 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.4 2.8 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 3.4 2.8 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360 320 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- 150-190

-- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- 250-260

-- Probe material for reactive gases Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel

-- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- Monthly
Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- -- -- -- 02/07/2013, 08/13/2013 Air Toxics -NATTSState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 77 Local Site Name South Phoenix Pollutant (POC) VOC (6)
Parameter code Multiple Basic monitoring objective Research

Site type(s) Population Exposure Monitor type(s) UATMP
Instrument manufacturer and model ATEC 8001
Method code 101
FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- Collecting Agency ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other) ERG Reporting Agency ERG Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Neighborhood Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 8/5/2001 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) 1:12 Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4.6 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.6 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 8.0 Distance from trees (meters) 4.8 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters) 8.0 Tree Height above Probe (meters) 8.0 Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 335 Restricted airflow (degrees) 240-265 Prevailing wind direction (degrees) 250-260 Probe material for reactive gases Stainless Steel Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- Air Toxics - UATMPState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 78 Local Site Name ADEQ Building Banner Mesa Medical Center Estrella Mountain Community College North Mountain Summit North Mountain Summit Pollutant (POC) Visibility (1) Visibility (1) Visibility (1) Visibility (1) Visibility (2)
Parameter code

-- -- -- -- -- Basic monitoring objective Public Information Public Information Public Information Public Information Public Information

Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- -- -- -- --

Instrument manufacturer and model CANON EOS Rebel T2i CANON EOS Rebel T2i CANON EOS Rebel T2i CANON EOS Rebel T2i CANON EOS Rebel T2i
Method code

-- -- -- -- -- FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- -- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Urban Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/01/2002 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 01/01/1993 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- Distance from supporting structure (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb

-- -- -- -- -- Visibility - Urban Haze - CameraState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 79 Local Site Name Dysart Estrella Vehicle Emissions Laboratory Pollutant (POC) Bscat/PM2.5 (1) Bscat/PM2.5 (1) Bscat/PM2.5 (1)
Parameter code

-- -- -- Basic monitoring objective Public Information Public Information Public Information

Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exp osure Population Exp osure Monitor type(s)

-- -- --

Instrument manufacturer and model Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer
Method code

-- -- -- FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/01/2003 01/01/2003 06/25/2003 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Every 5 min. Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 5 5 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters)

-- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- -- -- Distance from trees (meters)

-- 5 10 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- -- Visibility - Urban Haze - NephelometerState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 80 Local Site Name Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer

Transmitter Pollutant (POC) Bext (1) Bext (1)
Parameter code

-- -- Basic monitoring objective Public Information Public Information

Site type(s) Population Exposure Population E xposure Monitor type(s)

-- --

Instrument manufacturer and model Optec LVP-2 Transmissometer Receiver Optec LVP-2 Transmissometer

Method code

-- -- FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 12/01/1992 12/01/1992 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 30 27 Distance from supporting structure (meters)

-- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters) 5

-- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- -- Distance from trees (meters)

-- -- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 240 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- Visibility - Urban Haze - TransmissometerState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 81 Local Site Name Dysart Estrella Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Pollutant (POC) Temp R/H (1) Temp R/H (1) Temp R/H (1)
Parameter code 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 62101, 62201 Basic monitoring objective

-- -- --

Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- -- --

Instrument manufacturer and model Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Method code 040 040 040 FRM/FEM/ARM/other

-- -- -- Collecting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- Reporting Agency ADEQ ADEQ ADEQ Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Urban Urban Urban Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 07/16/2003 02/11/2003 01/01/1994 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) Continuous Continuous Continuous Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 5 5 32 Distance from supporting structure (meters)

-- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- 10 Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- -- -- Distance from trees (meters)

-- 5

-- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) Y Y Y Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N)

-- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- -- -- Visibility - Urban Haze - Temp/RHState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 82 Local Site Name Chiricahua Entrance Station Douglas Red Cross Grand Canyon National Park - Hance Camp Greer Water Treatment Plant Ike's Backbone JLG Supersite JLG Supersite Meadview

Pollutant (POC) IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE
Parameter code Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Basic monitoring objective Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Site type(s) Background Other Background Other Other Other Other Background Monitor type(s) IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE
Instrument manufacturer and model

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Method code Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various
FRM/FEM/ARM/other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Collecting Agency NPS ADEQ NPS NFS UC Davis ADEQ ADEQ NFS Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reporting Agency UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Neighborhood Neighborhood Regional Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 03/02/1988 06/02/2004 09/24/1997 02/29/2000 04/02/2000 04/25/2001 04/25/2001 09/04/1991 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 4 3

-- 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) -- -- -- 1.5 1

-- -- -- Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters) 10 8

-- -- 5 10 10

-- Distance from trees (meters) 10 6

-- 50 23 10 10

-- Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- 4 4

-- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360

-- 360 360 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) N N N N N N N N Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb -- 01/28/2014

-- 08/28/2013 10/23/2013 12/02/2013 12/02/2013 06/05/2013 Visibility - IMPROVEState of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 83 Local Site Name Organ Pipe National Monument Petrified Forest National Park Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Queen Valley Saguaro National Park East Saguaro National Park West Sycamore Canyon Tonto National Monument
Pollutant (POC) IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE
Parameter code Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Multiple Basic monitoring objective Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Research Site type(s) Other Background Other Other Background Other Background Background Monitor type(s) IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE IMPROVE
Instrument manufacturer and model

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Method code Various Various Various Various Various Various Various Various
FRM/FEM/ARM/other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Collecting Agency NPS NPS NFS ADEQ NPS NPS ADEQ / UC Davis NPS Analytical Lab (weight, toxics, other)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reporting Agency UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis UC Davis Spatial Scale (micro, neighborhood) Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Regional Monitoring start date (MM/DD/YYYY) 01/15/2003 03/02/1988 02/10/2000 04/30/2001 06/04/1988 04/19/2001 09/11/1991 04/23/1988 Current sampling frequency (1:3, continuous) 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 1:3 Calculated sampling frequency (1:3 / 1:1)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Sampling season (MM/DD-MM/DD) 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 01/01-12/31 Probe height (meters) 3.4 4 5 5.2

-- 4 4 5 Distance from supporting structure (meters) 1.4

-- 1.5 2.2

-- 1.5 1.5 1.5 Distance from obstructions on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from obstructions not on roof (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance from trees (meters) 13

-- 20

-- -- 15 15 8 Obstruction Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Tree Height above Probe (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance to furnace or incinerator flue (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Distance between collocated monitors (meters)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Unrestricted airflow (degrees) 360 360 360 360

-- 360 360 360 Restricted airflow (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Prevailing wind direction (degrees)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Probe material for reactive gases

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Residence time for reactive gases (seconds)

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Changes within the next 18 months? (Y/N) N N N N N N N N Comparison against the annual PM2.5? (Y/N) N N N N N N N N Frequency of flow rate verification manual PM and Pb samplers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of flow rate verification automated PM analyzers -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Frequency of one-point QC check gaseous instruments -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Last Annual PE audit for gaseous parameters

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Last two semi-annual flow rate audits PM and Pb 05/08/2013

-- 03/07/2013 01/22/2014

-- 07/10/2013 09/11/2013 06/11/2013 Visibility - IMPROVE - continued

## Appendix D

– Site Information Data Tables
Note: So me measurements are rounded and/or estimations

This appendix contains detailed information about sites that are fully or partially operated by ADEQ, as well as sites that ADEQ has a strong association with (e.g. IMPROVE sites). All current sites and those closed after July 1, 201 4 are included in th is appendix. S ites that were closed after July 1, 201 4 contain a note indicating so in the site summary section

. This appendix also contains general information about the air quality monitors at each site. See Appendix C for more detailed information on specific monitor s and networks

. 

### AQS ID ADEQ ID SITE NAME PAGE 21737 ADEQ Building 87 04

- 019

- 0001 16316 Ajo 88 04

- 012

- 8000 34961 Alamo Lake 89 19489 Banner M esa Medical Center 90 04

- 015

- 1003 16365 Bullhead City 91 04

- 003

- 8001 16679 Chiricahua Entrance Station 9 2 04

- 003

- 1005 16503 Douglas Red Cross 93 04

- 013

- 4010 19550 Dysart 95 04

- 013

- 8005 16506 Estrella 96 21736 Estrella Mountain Community College 97 04

- 005

- 1008 16707 Flagstaff Middle School 98 04

- 007

- 1002 16593 Globe Highway 99 04

- 005

- 8102 16682 Grand Canyon National Park

– Hance Camp 100 04

- 001

- 8001 16323 Greer Water Treatment Plant 101 04

- 007

- 1001 16326 Hayden Old Jail 102 04

- 025

- 8104 16421 Ike ’s Backbone 103 04

- 013

- 9997 16328 JLG Supersite 104 04

- 015

- 9000 21298 Meadview 107 04

- 007

- 8000 16629 Miami Golf Course 108 04

- 007

- 0011 16631 Miami Jones Ranch 109 04

- 007

- 0009 16382 Miami Ridgeline 110 04

- 007

- 0012 16632 Miami Townsite 111 04

- 023

- 000 4 16511 Nogales Post Office 112 16480 North Mountain Summit 114 04

- 019

- 0005 16681 Organ Pipe National Monument 115 04

- 003

- 0011 16391 Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant 116 04

- 007

- 0008 16317 Payson Well Site 117 04

- 001

- 0012 16473 Petrified Forest National Park 118 16829 Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver 119 16330 Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter 120 04

- 007

- 8100 16446 Pleasant Valley Ranger Station 121 04

- 025

- 8033 133011 Prescott College AQD 122 04

- 021

- 8001 16394 Queen Valley 123 04

- 019

- 0020 16499 Rillito 125 04

- 019

- 0021 16474 Saguaro National Park East 126 04

- 019

- 9000 16475 Saguaro National Park West 127 142818 Sedona Fire Station AQD 128 04

- 013

- 4003 16377 South Phoenix 129 04

- 005

- 8103 16476 Sycamore Canyon 130 04

- 007

- 0010 16447 Tonto Nation al Monument 131 04

- 013

- 9998 16363 Vehicle Emissions Laboratory 132 04

- 027

- 8011 11319 Yuma Supersite 134



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 84

### Definitions for Appendix D

– Site Information Data Tables

Local Site Name Official name for the site as written in ADEQ’s AZURITE / AAAD datab ase Site Narrative Brief summary of the site location and surroundings

Site Information AQS ID Unique identifier from EPA’s Air Quality System database ADEQ ID Unique identifier from the AZURITE / AAAD database for each monitoring site Street Address Physical Street Address or cross streets of the monitoring site County Arizona county the monitor is located within CBSA Core Based Statistical Area that the site is located within. A CBSA is a U.S. geographic area defined by the Office of Management and Budget based around an urban center of at least 10,000 people and adjacent areas that are socioeconomically tied to the urban center by commuting. Surrounding Area Description of area around monitoring site (residential, commercial, industrial, agricult ural, desert, forest, mobile, blighted area, and military reservation) Distance to Road way Distance and direction from the edge of the nearest roadway to the instrument in meters Traffic Count of Nearest Major Roadway ADOT supplied traffic count for the nearest major roadway . Includes distance and direction of roadway if differs from the nearest roa dway.

Groundcover Type of surface at the base of the instrument (e.g. sand, cement, rooftop, metal, asphalt, etc.) Latitude The North/South geographic locat ion of a site in decimal degrees Longitude The East/West geographic location of a site in decimal degrees Elevation The vertical distance above sea level of the site in meters Site Established Date Date site was first used as a monitoring site

Monitor ing Information Pollutant The pollutant(s) or parameter(s) being collected or measured at the site Basic monitoring objective Purpose of monitoring for the parameter at the site (Public Information, NAAQS Comparison, or Research.) Site type(s) A brief de scription of the intended purpose of the monitor’s measurements (Extreme Downwind, Highest Concentration, Max Ozone Concentration, Max Precursor Impact, Population Exposure, Source Oriented, Upwind Background, General / Background, Regional Transport, Welf are

- Related Impacts, Quality Assurance, or Other) Monitor type(s) The associated monitoring network for the monitor (IMPROVE, Index Site, Industrial, NATTS, NCore, Non

- EPA Federal, PAMS, Proposed NCore, QA Collocated, SLAMS,Special Purpose, Supplemental S peciation, Trends Speciation, Tribal Monitor, Unofficial PAMS) Spatial scale Area represented by an air quality monitor (microscale: 0

– 100 m, middle scale: 0.1

– 0.5 km, neighborhood: 0.5

– 4 km, urban: 4

– 50 km, regional: ~50

– 500 km, or national/glo bal) Monitor Start Date Date that a pollutant, parameter, or measurement was started at the site Instrument manufacture and The specific make and model of the monitor or instrument used in the network
State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 85

### model

Site Photos Aerial View Image of site and the surrounding area (using Google Earth) Site View Most current photo of monitors at the site

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 86

### ADEQ Building The high

- resolution digital camera sits on the northeast corner of the building and points
to ward Camelback Mountain, which lies 13

. 4 km to the northeast. The pictures of the local view are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet
at http://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx

. The area between the site and Camelback Mountain is primarily resi dential with some commercial areas.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 21737 Street Address 1110 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 33.4483 Surrounding Area Residential /Com mercial Longitude

- 112.0878 Distance to roadway 84 m

– S

– Washington St. Elevation 329 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 10,852

– Washington St. Site Established Date 07/01/2002

Monitoring Information Pollutant Visibility Basic monitoring objective Public Information Site type(s) Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- Instrument manufacture and model CANON EOS Rebel T2i Spatial scale Urban Monitor Start Date 07/01/2002

Site Photos

Aerial view of ADEQ Building Camera on r ooftop of ADEQ Building

– 4/2010

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 87

### Ajo The site is located at the Pima County Maintenance Y ard, with the wind system mounted to the north of the instrument s

. The closest structure to the site is an east

- west oriented ADOT office/trailer to the south. To the east lie the stabilized tailings pile associated with the Ajo mining operation that closed in 1985

.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 019

- 0001 ADEQ ID 16316 Street Address 1211 Well R d

. Ajo, AZ 85321 County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.3820 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude

- 112.8575 Distance to roadway 109 m

– E

– Ajo Well Rd. 1 Elevation 515 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 500

– Ajo Well Rd

. 1 Site Established Date 07/01/1969

Monitoring Inform ation Pollutant PM 10 

### Wind Temp/RH Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison -- -- Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s) SLAMS

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Thermo TEOM 1400AB RM Young 5305 Anemometer Vaisala HMP 155 Probe

Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 02/11/1991 07/01/1969 02/11/2014

Site Photos

Aerial view of Ajo Ajo fenced area and meteorological tower

– 0 /201 4 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 88

### Alamo Lake The s ite was established to replace the Hillside site and is located in Alamo Lake State Park, which is approximately 49 km north of Wenden, AZ. The surrounding area consists of mostly desert, with a lake about 1 km to the northeast. A small water pump/storage tank (1,000 gallon) lies 7 meters to the east of the shelter

. More monitors will be added at this site over the next year as it becomes a designated background site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 012

- 8000 ADEQ ID 34961 Street Address Alamo Lake State Park County La Paz Groundcover Gravel

CBSA None Latitude 34.2439 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude

- 113.5586 Distance to roadway 80 m

– N E

– Alamo Rd. Elevation 403 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 230

– Alamo Rd. Site Established Date 05/20/2005

Monitoring Information Pollutant O 3 

### SO 2 

### PM 10 

### PM 2.5 

### Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison Site type(s) Regional Transport General / Background General / Background General / Background Monitor t ype(s) SLAMS S PM SLAMS SLAMS Instrument manufacture and model Teledyne API 400E Ecotech EC9850T Met One BAM 1020 Met One BAM 1020 Spatial scale Regional Regional Regional Regional Monitor Start Date 05/20/2005 01/14/2014 10/30/2013 11/05/2013

Site Ph otos

Regional view of Alamo Lake Alamo Lake shelter with PM inlets

– 12/2013

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 89

### Banner Mesa Medical Center The high

- resolution digital camera points to the Superstition Mountains, which lie 32 km east of the site. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx

. The area between the site and the mountains is primarily residential with some commercial areas.

Site Informa tion AQS ID None ADEQ ID 19489 Street Address 525 W. Brown Rd. Mesa, AZ 85201 County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 33.4335 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude

- 111.8428 Distance to roadway 170 m

– N

– W Brown S t. Elevation 454 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 32,760

– Country Club Dr

. – 260m

– E Site Established Date 01/01/1993

Monitoring Information Pollutant Visibility Basic monitoring objective Public Information Site type(s) Population E xposure Monitor type(s)

-- Instrument manufacture and model CANON EOS Rebel T2i Spatial scale Urban Monitor Start Date 01/01/1993

Site Photos

Aerial view of Banner Mesa Medical Center Banner Mesa Medical Center Camera

– 05/2013

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 90

### Bullhead City The site is located on the rooftop of the U. S . Post Office Building, northeast of SR 95 and 7 th


### Street

. The surrounding area is commercial and res idential to the west and south. The Colorado River lies to the west less than 400 meters

. To the northeast /east

, about 575 meter s , is the Bullhead City Airport

.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 015

- 1003 ADEQ ID 16365 Street Address 990 Highway 95 Bullhead City, AZ 86429 County Mohave Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Lake Havasu City

- Kingman Latitude 35.15 39 Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude

- 11 4.5661 Distance to roadway 30 m

– W

– SR 95 Elevation 156 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 25,500

– SR 95 Site Established Date 11/01/1997

Monitoring Information Pollutant PM 10 

### Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison Site type(s) Population Exposure Monitor type(s) SLAMS Instrument manufacture and model Thermo TEOM 1400AB Spatial scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 11/05/1997

Site Photos

Aerial view of Bullhead City Roof of Bullhe ad City Post Office

– 0 6 /2012
State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 91

### Chiricahua Entrance Station The site is operated by the N PS

. The surrounding area is wilderness and desert. The Chiricahua National Monument lies 3. 8 km to the northeast.

Site Informatio n AQS ID 04

- 003

- 8001 ADEQ ID 16679 Street Address 13063 E. Bonita Canyon Rd. Wilcox, AZ 85643 County Cochise Groundcover Dirt/ R ocks

CBSA Sierra Vista

- Douglas Latitude 32.0094 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude

- 109.3891

Distance to roadway 99 m

– E

– Bonita Canyon Rd. Elevation 1

, 5 7 0 m
Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 216

– Bonita Canyon Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/1988

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective Research Site type(s) Background Monitor type(s) IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model -- Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 03/02/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Chiricahua Entrance Station Chiricahua Entrance Station shelter and IMPROVE

– 07/2008

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 92

### Douglas Red Cross The site is located at the Red Cross building on the south side of 15 th 

### Street

. The surrounding area is a mix of residential and commercial land use

. The site is about 1,6 85 me ters from the Arizona/Mexico bo rder. Due to an oversight when loading IMPROVE data to the AQS database, a second AQS ID was created ( 04

- 003

- 9000 ) for IMPROVE data. This is an IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 003

- 1005 ADEQ ID 16503 Street Address 1445 E. 15 th 

### St. Douglas, AZ 85607 County Cochise Ground cover Dirt/ G rass

CBSA Sierra Vista

- Douglas Latitude 31.3492 Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude

- 109.5396 Distance to roadway 30 m

– N

– 14 th 

### St. Elevation 1

, 231 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 2,474

– 14 th 

### St. Site Established D ate 09/01/1998

Monitoring Information Pollutant PM 10 

### PM 2.5 

### Temp/RH Wind Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison -- -- Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s) SL AMS SLAMS

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Thermo TEOM 1400AB Met One BAM 1020 Vaisala HMP 155 Probe RM Young 5305 Anemometer Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 09/02/1998 11/02/2000 08/16/2012 08 /06/2012

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective Research Site type(s) Other Monitor type(s) IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model -- Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 06/02/2004

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 93

### Site Photos

Aerial view of Douglas Red Cross Douglas Red Cross fenced site

– 0 4 /20 1 3

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 94

### Dysart The site is located in the Marico pa County Facility Maintenance Y ard at the southeast corner of Bell Road and Dysart Road and is shared with MCAQD

. The surro unding area is commercial and residential

.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 013

- 4010 ADEQ ID 19550 Street Address 16825 N. Dysart Rd. Surprise, AZ 85374 County Maricopa Groundcover G ravel

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 33.637 0 Surrounding Area Com mercial /Residential Longitude

- 112.3 39 3 Distance to roadway 14 m

– W

– Dysart Rd Elevation 3 57 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 51,673

– Bell Rd

. – 150m

– N Site Established Date 01/01/2003

Monitoring Information Pollutant Bscat/PM2.5 Temp R/H Basic monitoring objective Public Information -- Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer Vaisala HMP155

Probe Spatial scale Urban Urban Monitor Start Date 01/01/2003 07/16/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Dysart Dysart ADEQ Nephelometer tower attached to county shelter

– 0 3/2013

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 95

### Estrella The site is located in the southeast corner of the Maricopa County Mai ntenance Yard at Estrella P ark. The surrounding area consist of the Estrella Mountains to the east, south, and west; a golf course 256 meters to the west; and a mixture of open land, agricultural lands, residential, and commercial activity to the north.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 013

- 8005 ADEQ ID 16506 Street Address 15099 W. Casey Abbott Rd. Goodyear, AZ 85338 County Maricopa Groundcover Grass/ G ravel

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 33.3833 Surrounding Area Desert/R ecreation Area Longitude

- 112.3728

Distance to roadway 258 m

– N

– W. Vineyard Ave. Elevation 277 m
Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 910

– W

. Vineyard Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1995

Monitoring Information Pollutant Bscat/PM2.5 Temp R/H Basic monitoring objective Public Information -- Sit e type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer Vaisala HMP155

Probe Spatial scale Urban Urban Monitor Start Date 01/01/2003 02/11/2003

Site Photos

Aerial view of Estrella Estrella Nephelometer tower

– 0 6/2012 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 96

### Estrella Mountain Community College One high

- resolution digital camera points to the Estrella Mountains, which lies 1 1 km to the southwest

, and the other camera points to the White Ta nks mountai n range which is 20 km to the northeast

. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet at http://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx

. The area between the site and the m ountain ranges is a mixture of residential, commercial, and agricul tural uses.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 21736 Street Address 3000 N. Dysart Rd. Avondale, AZ 85323 County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 3 3.4836 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude

- 112.3503 Distance to roadway 155 m

– S

– Thomas Rd. Elevation 305 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 9,798

– Thomas Rd. Site Established Date 01/01/1993

Monitoring Information Pollutant Visibility Basic monitoring objective Public Information Site type(s) Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- Instrument manufacture and model CANON EOS Rebel T2i Spatial scale Urban Monitor Start Date 01/01/1993

Site Photos

Aerial vie w of Estrella Mountain Community College No photo

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 97

### Flagstaff Middle School The site is west of Bonito Road on the rooftop of a Flagstaff Middle School building. The surrounding area is generally residential

, with Thorpe Park located about 800 meters to t he
west , and US Route 180 approximately 415 meters to the east

. At the end of 2013 the O 3 

### , and the PM 10 

### , and PM 2.5 

### Partisols , will be removed from this site. Only the PM 2.5 

### E

- BAM unit will remain at the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 005

- 1008 ADEQ ID 16707 Street Address 755 N. Bonito St. Flagstaff, AZ 86001 County Coconino Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.2061 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude

- 111.6528 Distance to roadway 8 0 m

– E

– N. Bonito St. Elevation 2

, 120 m Traffic cou nt of

Nearest Major Roadway 3,2 00

– N. Bonito St

. Site Established Date 10/29/1996

Monitoring Information Pollutant O 3 

### PM 2.5 

### Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison Public Information Site type(s) Max O 3 

### Concentration Population Exposure Mo nitor type(s) SLAMS Special Purpose

Instrument manufacture and model Teledyne API 400E Met One E

- BAM Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 03/13/2008 09/09/1999

Site Photos

Aerial view of Flagstaff Middle School O 3 

### sample cane at Flagstaff

– 11/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 98

### Globe Highway This site is the l ocation of the collocated TSP Pb monitors in Hayden, AZ . ASARCO mine also maintains a SO 2 

### analyzer

, Pb sampler, PM sampler, wind monitor, rain gage, and temp/RH at the site. The site is located on the southwest end of a small canyon and may be influenced by both broad and local meteorological conditions. The Site is located approximately 1 km to the east/southeast of the ASARCO smelting facility. Surrounding trees are below inlet height a nd have no vegetation.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16593 Street Address SR 77 Winkelman, AZ 85292 County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.002 Surrounding Area Desert/ Residential Longitude

- 110.765 Distance to roadway 10 m

– W

– SR 77 Elevation 602 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 2,700

– SR 77 Site Established Date 01/01/1975

Monitoring Information Pollutant Pb Pb Temp/RH Wind Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison -- -- Site type(s) Highe st Concentration, Source Oriented Highest Concentration, Source Oriented Highest Concentration, Source Oriented Highest Concentration, Source Oriented Monitor type(s) SLAMS QA Collocated

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Tisch TE

8550

- BL TSP Tisch T E

8550

- BL TSP Vaisala HMP 155 Probe RM Young 5305 Anemometer Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 10/01/2010 10/01/2010 04/15/2011 04/15/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Globe Highway Shelter, towers , and T SP monitors at Globe Highway

– 07/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 99

### Grand Canyon National Park

- Hance Camp Th e site is operated by the N PS

. The site is 183 meters south of East Rim Drive and 1,931 meters south of Gra n dview Point turnoff. The site is in a clearing surrounded by forest.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 005

- 810 2 ADEQ ID 16682 Street Address West of SR 64

- Grand Canyon, AZ 86023 County Coconino Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.9731 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude

- 111.9841 Distance to roadway 20 0 m

– E

– SR64 Elevation 2

, 2 35 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 6,579

– SR 64 Site Established Date 09/24/1997

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective Research Site type(s) Background Monitor type(s) IMPR OVE Instrument manufacture and model -- Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 09/24/1997

Site Photos

Regional view of Grand Canyon NP

- Hance Camp Grand Canyon NP

- Hance Camp shelter

– date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 100

### Greer Water Treatment Pla nt The site is located in the Apache National Forest and is operated the USFS

. The surrounding area is forest with the town of Greer approximately 4 km to the south/ southwest

.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 001

- 8001 ADEQ ID 16323 Street Address SR 260 & SR 373 Greer, AZ 85927 County Apache Groundcover Grass

CBSA None Latitude 34.0583 Surrounding Area Forest Longitude

- 109.44 00 Distance to roadway 1,600 m

– N

– SR 373 Elevation 2

, 503 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 1, 0 44

– SR 373 Site Establi shed Date 01/01/2000

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective Research Site type(s) Other Monitor type(s) IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model -- Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 02/29/2000

Site Photos

Aerial view of Greer Water Treatment Plant Shelter at Greer Water Treatment Plant

– 09/20 12

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 101

### Hayden Old Jail The site is located in a shelter next to the old Hayden Jail bu ilding near the center of town. The instruments were pre viously located in the jail building and were moved to a shelter next to the jail due to safety and siting concerns

. The surrounding area consists mainly of residential and

co mmercial . The site is located approximately 1 km to the west of the ASARCO smelti ng facility. ASARCO mine also maintains a sulfur dioxide analyze r at the site

.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 007

- 1001 ADEQ ID 16326 Street Address Canyon Dr. & Kennecott Ave. Hayden, AZ 85235 County Gila Groundcover Shelter

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.006 2 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude

- 110.786 4 Distance to roadway 10 m

– E

– Canyon Dr. Elevation 625 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 1,790

– Velasco Ave.

– 242m

– E Site Established Date 01/01/1969

Monitoring Information Pollutant SO 2 

### PM 10 

### Temp/RH Wind Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison -- -- Site type(s) Source Oriented Source Oriented Source Oriented Source Oriented Monitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Ecotech EC9850T Thermo TEOM 1400AB Vaisala HMP 155 Probe RM Young 5305 Anemometer Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/1975 01/06/1981 02/02/2011 02/02/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Hayden Old Jail Hayden Old Jai l shelter , PM inlet and meteorological tower

– 0 5 /20 1 4
State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 102

### Ike’s Backbone The site is operated by the USFS

. The surrounding area is Tonto National Forest, which includes Mazatzal and Pine Mountain Wilderness areas . The site is located on a small ridge with the Verde River and mountains nearby.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 025

- 8104 ADEQ ID 16421 Street Address Fossil Creek Rd

. and Childs Rd. Strawberry, AZ 85544 County Coconino Groundcover Roc ks/Plants

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 34.3406 Surrounding Area Fo rest Longitude

- 111.6825 Distance to roadway 1000m

– N

– Childs Rd Elevation 1

, 303 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 475

– Fossil Creek Rd.

– 6500m

– NE Site Established Date 04/02/2000

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitor ing objective Research Site type(s) Other Monitor type(s) IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model -- Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 04/02/2000

Site Photos

Regional view of Ike’s Backbone IMPROVE at Ike’s Backbone

– 2011

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 103

### JLG Supersite The site was established to represent air quality in the central core of the Phoenix metropolitan

area. The surrounding area is prima rily residential neighborhoods , with I

- 1 7 approximately 1.6 km to the west

. This is also an IMPR OVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 013

- 9997 ADEQ ID 16328 Street Address 4530 N. 17 th 

### Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85015 County Maricopa Groundcover G ravel

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 33.5038 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude

- 112.0957 Distance to roadway 10 m

– E

– 17 th 

### Ave. Elevation 354 m
Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 1,557

– Campbell Ave.

– 158m

– S 17,639

– N 19 th 

### Ave.

– 367m

– W Site Established Date 07/01/1993

Monitoring Information Pollutant CO NO 2 

### / NOx NOy O 3 

### Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison

.

Research NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison Site type(s) Highest Concentration Highest Concentration

,

Population Exposure Population Exposure Max O 3 

### Concentration

Monitor type(s) SLAMS, NCore , PAMS SLAMS, PAMS NCore SLAMS, NCore, PAMS Instrument manufacture and model Ecotech EC9830T Ecotech EC9841 B Ecotech 9843 Teledyne API 400E Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 01/01/ 2011 07/01/1993

Monitoring Information Pollutant SO 2 

### Carbonyl VOC SVOC Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison Research Research Research Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure , Max Precursor

Impact Population Exposure, Max Precurso r

Impact Population Exposure

Monitor type(s) SLAMS, NCore PAMS, NATTS PAMS, NATTS NATTS

Instrument manufacture and model Ecotech EC9850T ATEC 8000 ATEC 2200 Tisch TE

1000BL Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 03/03/2005 05/15/1999 05/15/1999 07/08/2007 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 104

### Monitoring Information Pollutant Pb

- PM 10 

### / PM 10 

### metals

speciation PM 10 

### PM 10

- 2.5 

### PM 2.5


### Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison,

Research NAAQS Comparison Research NAAQS Comparison Site type(s) Popul ation Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s) SLAMS, NCore, NATTS SLAMS NCore SLAMS, NCore

Instrument manufacture and model Thermo Partisol 2000 Met One BAM 1020 Met One BAM 1020 Met One BAM 1020 Spatial sca le Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/2005 07/01/1993 11/10/2010 07/01/2003

Monitoring Information Pollutant PM 2.5 

### PM 2.5 

### Speciation PM 2.5 

### Speciation Temp/RH Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison Research Research

-- Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s) SLAMS, NCore Supplemental Speciation, NCore Supplemental Speciation, NCore --

Instrument manufacture and model Thermo Partisol 2000 Met One SuperSASS URG 3000N Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 07/01/2003 02/21/2000 02/21/2000 07/01/1993

Monitoring Information Pollutant Wind IMPROVE IMPROVE Basic monitorin g objective -- Research Research Site type(s) Population Exposure Other Other Monitor type(s)

-- IMPROVE IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model RM Young 5305 Anemometer -- --
Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Da te 07/01/1993 04/25/2001 04/25/2001

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 105

### Site Photos

Aerial view of JLG Supersite Eastern side of JLG Supersite two shelters, roof top, and meteorological tower

– 08/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 106

### Meadview The site is located within the Lake Mead National Recreation Ar ea on the north end of Meadview, AZ

, where the Grand Canyon meets Lake Mead

. The surrounding area is primarily desert

. To the southwest 64.4 km is US 93, which is the closest highway to the site and about 96.5 km to the southeast is downtown Kingman

. This is an IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 015

- 9000 ADEQ ID 21298 Street Address Pierce Ferry Rd. Meadview, AZ 86444 County Mohave Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Lake Havasu City

- Kingman Latitude 36.0193 Surrounding Area Desert /Residential Lon gitude

- 114.06 84 Distance to roadway 100 m

– E

– Pierce Ferry Rd Elevation 902 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 0

– Pierce Ferry Rd

. Site Established Date 09/04/1991

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective Resea rch Site type(s) Background Monitor type(s) IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model -- Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 09/04/1991

Site Photos

Regional view of Meadview Photo of Meadview shelter

– 11/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 107

### Miami Golf Course This site is the location of the TSP

- Pb monitor in Miami , AZ . Freeport McMoR an Copper and Gold Inc also maintain ed two particulate matter monitors at the site but were removed as of January 2014

. The site is located near the Cobre Valley Count ry Club with residential areas to the south and east and the Freeport McMoRan facility approximately 2 km to the west/southwest

. Surrounding trees are below inlet height and have no vegetation.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 007

- 8000 ADEQ ID 16629 Street Address SR 188 and US 60 Miami, AZ 85539 County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.4190 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude

- 110.8296 Distance to roadway 220

– S E

– SR 188 Elevation 1000 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 3,300

– SR 188 Site Established Date 01/01/1997

Monitoring Information Pollutant Pb PM 10 

### Temp/RH Wind Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison -- -- Site type(s) Source Oriented Source Oriented Source Oriented Source Oriented Monitor ty pe(s) SLAMS SLAMS

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Tisch TE

8550

- BL TSP Thermo TEOM 1400AB Vaisala HMP 155 Probe RM Young 5305 Anemometer Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 10/01/2010 7/26/2012 0 6/08/2011 06/08/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Golf Course Fenced Miami Golf Course site

– 0 5 /201 4

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 108

### Miami Jones Ranch This site is one of three SO 2 

### sites in the Miami area. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc operate a SO 2 

### instrument at this site as well. The site is located south of the town of Miami and is over 3 km south/southwest of the smelter. The site located in the desert hills over looking the town and is off a gravel/dirt road.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 007

- 0011 ADEQ ID 1663 1 Street Address Cherry Flats Rd. Miami, AZ 85539 County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.3853 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude

- 110.8673 Distance to roadway 15m

– SE

– Cherry Flats Rd. Elevation 1 ,242 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway n/a Site Established Date 01/01/1997

Monitoring Information Pollutant SO 2 

### Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison Site type(s) Source Oriented Monitor type(s) SLAMS Instrument manufacture and model Ecotech EC9850T Spatial scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 0 2 /01/2013

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Jones Ranch Fenced Miami Jones Ranch site

– 03/2013

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 109

### Miami Ridgeline This is one of three SO 2 

### site in the Miami area. The site is located inside on private property off of Linden Road and sits on the side of a north

- south oriented ridge

, which slopes in a northerly direction toward the town of Miami. The surrounding area is desert. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. also maintain a PM 10 

### monitor at the site. The Freeport McMoRan smelter is 1.6 km to the north of the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 007

- 0009 ADEQ ID 16382 Street Address 4030 Linden St. Miami, AZ 85539 County Gila Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.3992 Surrounding Area Re sidential Longitude

- 110.8589 Distance to roadway 40 m

– N

– Linden St. Elevation 1

, 085 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 510

– Loomis Ave.

– 230m

– W Site Established Date 0 1 /01/199 3

Monitoring Information Pollutant SO 2 

### Basic monitori ng objective NAAQS Comparison Site type(s) Source Oriented Monitor type(s) SLAMS Instrument manufacture and model Thermo 43C Spatial scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 10/05/1995

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Ridgeline Fenced Mi a mi Ridgeline site

– 0 5/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 110

### Miami Townsite This site is one of three SO 2 

### sites in the Miami area. Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc

run a SO 2 

### instrument at this site as well. This site is located on the western side of Miami , near the cen ter of the town . There is a church to the west and a Police Station to the west with residential to the north and south. The road is located to the south of the site. The smelter is over 2 km to the northwest of the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 007

- 0012 ADEQ ID 16382 Street Address Sullivan ST & Davis Canyon Miami, AZ 85539 County Gila Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.3973 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude

- 110.8744 Distance to roadway 16.5 m

– SE

– Sullivan St. Elevation 1,042 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 470

– Sullivan St

. Site Established Date 0/01/199 7

Monitoring Information Pollutant SO 2 

### Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison Site type(s) Source Oriented Monitor type(s) SLAMS Instrument

ma nufacture and model Ecotech EC9850T Spatial scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 0 2 /01/2013

Site Photos

Aerial view of Miami Townsite Fenced Miami Townsite

– 05/2013

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 111

### Nogales Post Office The site is located on the rooftop of the U.S

. Post Office b uilding , which lies approximately 670 meters north from the Arizona/Mexico Border. The surrounding area is a mixture of commercial and residential land use

. This site is used to meet the PM 2.5 

### collocation requirement.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 023

- 0004 ADEQ ID 16511 Street Address 300 N. Morley Ave. Nogales, AZ 85621 County Santa Cruz Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Nogales Latitude 31.3372 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude

- 110.9367 Distance to roadway 37.6 m

– NW

– Morley Ave. Elevation 1

, 176 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 7,199

– Morley Ave. Site Established Date 01/01/1980

Monitoring Information Pollutant PM 10 

### PM 10 

### PM 2.5 

### PM 2.5 

### Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAA QS Comparison Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Highest Concentration Highest Concentration Monitor type(s) SLAMS QA Collocated SLAMS QA Collocated Instrument manufacture and model Met One BAM 1020 Thermo Partisol 2000 Met One BAM 10 20 Thermo Partisol 2000 Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/1980 01/01/1980 04/01/1999 04/01/1999

Monitoring Information Pollutant Temp/RH Wind Basic monitoring objective -- -- Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Vaisala HMP 155 Probe RM Young 5305 Anemometer Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 08/11/2011 01/01/1980

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 112

### Site Photos

Aerial view of Nogales Post Office Particulate and meteorological monitors on roof of Nogales Post Office

– 0 4 /20 13

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 113

### North Mountain Summit The site is located on a mountaintop in the North Mountain Recreation Area of Phoenix

. The high

- resolution digital camera faces South Mountain , which lies 27 km to the south. The pictures of the local views are updated every 5 minutes and can be viewed on the internet
at http://phoenixvis.net/index.aspx

. The surrounding area is desert recreation area to the north and west and residential with some commercial activity to the south and east.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16480 Street Address West side of 7 th 

### St

. in North Mountain Recreation Area Phoenix, AZ County Maricopa Groundcover Dirt/Desert

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 33. 5855 Surrounding Area Residential /Desert Longitude

- 112.0 722 Distance to roadway 850 m

– E

– 7 th 

### St. Elevation 625 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 28,210

– 7 th 

### St. Site Established Date 01/01/1993

Monitoring Information Pollutant Visibility Visibility Basic monitoring objective Public Information Public Information Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- -- Inst rument manufacture and model CANON EOS Rebel T2i CANON EOS Rebel T2i Spatial scale Urban Urban Monitor Start Date 01/01/1993 01/01/1993

Site Photos

Aerial view of North Mountain Summit Camera located on tower at North Mountain Summit

– 04/ 2013

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 1 14

### Organ Pipe N ational M onument The site is owned by the NPS, who operates the monitor at the site

. The site is located 1 km south/southwest of the national monument visitor center , which is about 35.4 km south of Why, AZ

. The site is about seven met ers from a water pump house and lies about 540 meters

e ast of a small mountain range. The surrounding area is predominately desert. This is an IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 019

- 0005 ADEQ ID 16681 Street Address SR 85 & Puerto Blanco Rd. Ajo, AZ 85321 County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 31.949 9 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude

- 112.801 0 Distance to roadway 400 m

– E

– SR 85 Elevation 50 5 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 1,52 5

– SR 85 Site Established Dat e 0 1/01/19 71

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective Research Site type(s) Other Monitor type(s) IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model -- Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 01/15/2003

Si te Photos

Regional view of Organ Pipe NM Shelter at Organ Pipe NM

– 0 4 /201 4

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 115

### Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant The site is located approximately 1 km to the northeast of the Chemical Lime Plant, just south of SR 80 between Bisbee and Douglas , and 3.5 km north of the Arizona/Mexico border

. In 2011 the meteorological instruments were re

- located to this site when the Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant South site was closed. Other than the nearby Chemical Lime Plant, t he surrounding area is predominately deser t. The Chemical Lime Plant is no t operation al at this time.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 003

- 0011 ADEQ ID 16391 Street Address SR 80 & Paul Spur Rd. Paul Spur, AZ 85603 County Cochise Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Sierra Vista

- Douglas Latitude 31.3658 Surroun ding Area Desert Longitude

- 109.73 09 Distance to roadway 107 m

– S

– Paul Spur Rd. Elevation 1

, 278 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 4,920

– SR 80

– 230m

– N Site Established Date 01/01 /1985

Monitoring Information Pollutant PM 10 

### Temp/RH Wind Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison -- -- Site type(s) Source Oriented Source Oriented Source Oriented Monitor type(s) SLAMS

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Thermo TEOM 1400AB Vaisala HMP 155 Probe RM Young 5305 Anemometer Spatial scale Middle Middle Middle Monitor Start Date 01/06/1991 12/01/2011 12/01/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Paul Spur CLP Particulate monitors and m eteorological t ower at Paul Spur CLP

– 0 3 /201 3
State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 116

### Payson Well Site The site is located in the sou thern area of Payson, in a field at a well water site. To the south of the site are two tanks. In general, the surrounding area is commercial with some residential land use and 200 meters to the south east is SR 87. Site was moved 90m NE on the same parcel to meet siting requirements. The Thermo Partisol 2000 will be replaced with a continuous Met One B AM 1020 starting July 1, 2014

.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 007

- 0008 ADEQ ID 16317 Street Address 204 W. Aero Dr. Payson, AZ 85541 County Gila Groundcov er Gravel

CBSA Payson Latitude 34.229 7 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude

- 111.329 5 Distance to roadway 134 m

– S

– Aero Dr. Elevation 1

, 501 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 1,724

– Aero Dr. Site Established Date 01/01/1991

Mon itoring Information Pollutant PM 10 

### PM2.5 Temp/RH Wind Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison Public Information -- -- Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s) SLAMS Special Purpos e

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Met One BAM 1020 Met One E

- BAM Vaisala HMP 45C Probe RM Young 5103 Anemometer Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 01/01/1991 05/16/2012 05/30/1991 05/30/1991

Sit e Photos

Aerial view of Payson Well Site Payson Well Site continuous part iculate monitor probe and shelter

– 5/2014 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 117

### Petrified Forest N ational P ark The site i s operated by the N PS and is located 1.6 km north of park headquarters

. The p ark sits along I

- 40 and t he surrounding area is desert.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 001

- 0012 ADEQ ID 16473 Street Address I

- 40 & Petrified Forest Rd. Petrified Forest National Park, AZ County Apache Groundcover Dirt

CBSA None Latitude 35.0 770 Surrounding Area Des ert Longitude

- 109. 76 90 Distance to roadway 1,05 0 m

– SW

– I

- 40 Elevation 1

, 766 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 15,246

– I

- 40 Site Established Date 03/02/1988

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective Research Site type(s) Background Monitor type(s) IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model -- Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 03/02/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Petrified Forest NP Photo of Petrified Forest NP taken from IMPROVE website

– date unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 118

### Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver The si te is located in downtown Phoenix on the rooftop of the Holiday Inn H otel near 2 nd 

### Avenue and Osborn Road

. The transmitter is located on top of the Phoenix Baptist Hospital 4.5 km to the northwest. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16829 Str eet Address 3600 N. 2 nd 

### Ave. Phoenix, AZ 85013 County Maricopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 33.4901 Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude

- 112.0767 Distance to roadway 25 m

– E

– Central Ave. Elevation 337 m Tr affic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 1,5470

– Central Ave

. Site Established Date 1 2 /01/1992

Monitoring Information Pollutant Bext Temp R/H Basic monitoring objective Public Information -- Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Mon itor type(s)

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Optec LVP

- 2 Transmissometer Receiver Vaisala HMP155

Probe Spatial scale Urban Urban Monitor Start Date 12/01/1992 01/01/1994

Site Photos

Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Receiver Phoenix Transmissometer Rece iver on hotel rooftop

– 12/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 119

### Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter The transmitter is located on the rooftop of Phoenix Baptist Hospital at 19 th 

### Avenue and Bethany Home Road

. The receiver is located at the Holiday Inn H otel 4.5 km to the southeast. The area between the two sites is a mix of residential and commercial

. A new LED bulb was installed in May 2014.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 16330 Street Address 2000 W. Bethany Home Rd. Phoenix, AZ 85015 County Mar icopa Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 33.5253 Surrounding Area Commercial/ Residential Longitude

- 112.1019 Distance to roadway 120 m

– S

– Beth. Home Rd. Elevation 340 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 40,950

– Bethany H ome Rd

. Site Established Date 12/01/1992

Monitoring Information Pollutant Bext Basic monitoring objective Public Information Site type(s) Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- Instrument manufacture and model Optec LVP

- 2 Transmissometer Spatial scale Urban Monitor Start Date 12/01/1992

Site Photos

Aerial view of Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Phoenix Transmissometer Transmitter Pathway

– 2005 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 120

### Pleasant Valley Ranger Station The site is operated by USFS . The si te is located on a hilltop s outh of Young, AZ , within the Sierra Ancha Wilderness and Tonto National Forest

. The surrounding area is a transitional zone between desert and forest

. The site lies 1, 16 0 meters to the south of SR 288

.

Site Information AQS I D 04

- 007

- 8100 ADEQ ID 16446 Street Address SR 288 & Old Cherry Rd. Young, AZ 85541 County Gila Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Payson Latitude 34.0908 Surrounding Area Desert/Forest Longitude

- 110.9419 Distance to roadway 250 m

– N

– SR288 Elevation 1

, 587 m Tr affic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 143

– SR 288 Site Established Date 01/01/2000

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective Research Site type(s) Other Monitor type(s) IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model - - Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 02/10/2000

Site Photos

Regional view of Pleasant Valley Ranger Station Shelter at Pleasant Valley Ranger Station

– 0 9/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 121

### Prescott College AQD The site was re located at Prescott College f rom the Mogollon Building to the Penstemon Building due to Mogollon Building’s renovation and to meet siting requirements

. The surrounding area is residential and commercial, with a high traffic street approximately 45
meters to the east.

Site Informati on AQS ID 04

- 025

- 8033 ADEQ ID 133011 Street Address 330 Grove Ave

. , Prescott, AZ 86301 County Yavapai Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Prescott Latitude 34.5467 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude

- 112.4761 Distance to roadway 45 m

– E

– Grove Ave. Elevation 1

, 591 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 13,300

– Grove Ave. Site Established Date 12/05/2006

Monitoring Information Pollutant O 3 

### PM 2.5 

### Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison Public Information Site type(s) Max O 3 

### Conce ntration Population Exposure Monitor type(s) SLAMS Special Purpose Instrument manufacture and model Teledyne 400e Met One E

- BAM Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 03/25/2008 07/13/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Prescott College AQD New Location of Prescott College AQD

– 10/2013 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 122

### Queen Valley The site is located in northern Pinal County on the far east/southeastern outskirts of the Phoenix metropolitan area. It is located 635 meters southeast of the small tow n of Queen Valley, A Z and the surrounding area is primarily desert

. Th is is a downwind PAMS type 3 site

. This is also an IMPORVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 021

- 8001 ADEQ ID 16394 Street Address 10 S. Queen Anne Dr. Queen Valley, AZ 85219 County Pinal Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 33.2938 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude

- 111.2857 Distance to roadway 87 m

– E

– Queen Anne Dr. Elevation 668 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 1,284

– Queen Anne Dr. Site Established Date 01/01/1998

Monitoring Information Pollutant O 3 

### NOy VOC Temp/RH Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison Research Research

-- Site type(s) Downwind Downwind Downwind Downwind Monitor type(s) SLAMS, PAMS PAMS PAMS

--
Instrument

ma nufacture and model Teledyne API 400E Thermo 42C TL Reactive ATEC 8001 Vaisala HMP 45C Probe Spatial scale Regional Regional Regional Regional Monitor Start Date 01/01/1998 01/01/1998 05/20/2001 06/23/2003

Monitoring Information Pollutant Wind IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective -- Research Site type(s) Downwind Other Monitor type(s)

-- IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model RM Young 5103 Anemometer --
Spatial scale Regional Regional Monitor Start Date 06/23/2003 04/30/2001

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 123

### Site Photos

Regional view of Queen Valley Shelter and meteorological tower at Queen Valley site

– 02 /201 2

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 124

### Rillito In February of 2007 the site was moved from the Water St. location 91 meters southwest to its current location at a city water pu mping station

. The surrounding area is primarily residential and industrial, with I

- 10 approximately 2 6 0 meters to the north east

. The site is located within the small town of Rillito, AZ and is approximately 500 meters to the north/northwest of the Cal Por tland Rillito Cement Plant.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 019

- 0020 ADEQ ID 16499 Street Address 8840 W. Robinson St. Rillito, AZ 85653 County Pima Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.4143 Surrounding Area Residential Longitude

- 111.1545 Distance to roadway 10 m

– S

– Robinson St. Elevation 626 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 2,634

– I

- 10 Front age Rd.

– 240m

– NE Site Established Date 01/01/1985

Monitoring Information Pollutant PM 10 

### Temp/RH Wind Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Compa rison -- -- Site type(s) Source Oriented Source Oriented Source Oriented Monitor type(s) SLAMS

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Thermo TEOM 1400AB Vaisala HMP 45C Probe RM Young 5103 Anemometer Spatial scale Middle Middle Middle Monitor St art Date 01/03/1985 03/30/2010 01/08/2004

Site Photos

Aerial view of Rillito Rillito m eteorological tower and particulate monitors on platform

– 0 4 /20 13
State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 125

### Saguaro National Park East The site is located within the Saguaro National Park East
, 805 meters south of park headquarters and is operated jointly by PDEQ and NPS. The area surrounding the site is scattered residential to the west and desert to the east

.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 019

- 0021 ADEQ ID 16474 Street Address 3905 S

. Old Spanish T rail Tucson, AZ 85730 County Pima Groundcover Dirt

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.174 0 Surrounding Area Residential/ Desert Longitude

- 110.73 60 Distance to roadway 82 m

– W

– Old Spanish Tr. Elevation 9 38 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 6,198

– Old S panish T r ail Site Established Date 06/04/1988

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective Research Site type(s) Background Monitor type(s) IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model -- Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 06/04/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Saguaro NP East Photo of Saguaro NP East taken from IMPROVE webs ite

– d ate unknown

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 126

### Saguaro National Park West The site is located within the Saguaro National Park West

. The site is operated by the NPS. The area s urrounding the site is residential to the northwest and south/southeast and desert to the northeast

. Th e site lies approximately 17 km south west of I

- 10

. This is an IMPROVE protocol site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 019

- 9000 ADEQ ID 16475 Street Address N

. Sandario Rd

. and W

. Mile Wide Rd

. Tucson, AZ County Pima Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Tucson Latitude 32.248 5 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude

- 111.217 5 Distance to roadway 27 m

– W

– Mile Wide Rd. Elevation 718 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 1,889

– Mile Wide Rd. Site Established Date 12/29/1996

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective Research Site type(s) Other Monitor type(s) IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model -- Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 04/19/2001

Site Photos

Regional view of Saguaro NP West Shelters at Saguaro NP West site

– 0 7 /20 12

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 127

### Sedona Fire Station AQD In 2011

, the EBAM instrument in Sedona was moved from the Sedona Post Office site to the Sedona Fire Station site due to concerns about local emissions affecting the monitor

. The Sedona Fire Sta tion site is located approximately 300 meters to the northeast of the Sedona Post Office site. The surrounding area is composed of residential and commercial use.

Site Information AQS ID None ADEQ ID 142818 Street Address 310 Forest Rd, Sedona, AZ 86 336 County Coconino Groundcover Rooftop

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 34.86 83 Surrounding Area Commercial/Residential Longitude

- 111.7633 Distance to roadway 50m

– N

– Forest Rd Elevation 1,326 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 5,689

– SR89A

– 150m

– E n/a Site Established Date 12/16/2011

Monitoring Information Pollutant PM 2.5 

### Basic monitoring objective Public Information Site type(s) Population Exposure Monitor type(s) Special Purpose Instrument manufacture and model Met One E

- BAM Spatial scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 12/16/2011

Site Photos

Aerial view of Sedona Fire Station E

- BAM on roof at Sedona Fire Station

– 3/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 128

### South Phoenix Th e site is owned by MCAQD. ADEQ operates t he toxics sampler at th e site. Th e site is situated in South Phoenix, at the edge of a high population area, bordering a mixture of resident ial and commercial properties. Two high population areas are locat ed north and west of the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 013

- 4003 ADEQ ID 16377 Street Address 33 W. Tamarisk St. Phoenix, AZ 85041 County Maricopa Groundcover Asphalt

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 33.403 0 Surrounding Area Residential/Commercial Longitude

- 112.07 50 Distance to roadway 83 m

– N

– Tamarisk St. Elev ation 330 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 19,110

– Central Ave

. – 165m

– E Site Established Date 01/01/1997

Monitoring Information Pollutant VOC Basic monitoring objective Research Site type(s) Population Exposure Monitor type(s) U ATMP Instrument manufacture and model ATEC 8001 Spatial scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 8/5/2001

Site Photos

Aerial view of South Phoenix Shelter and meteorological tower at South Phoenix site

– 04/2005 State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 129

### Sycamore Canyon The site is located near the entrance to Camp Raymond Boy Scout Camp

. Minimal obstructions exist in the area surrounding the site and no routine human activity occurs in the area surrounding the site. Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Area is 800 meters south of the site.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 005

- 8103 ADEQ ID 16476 Street Address Camp Kimball Rd. Flagstaff, AZ (Camp Raymond) County Coconino Groundcover Dirt/Grass

CBSA Flagstaff Latitude 35.1406 Surrounding Area Forest Longitude

- 111.96 9 2

Distance to road way 33 m

– NW

– Boy Scout Camp Rd Elevation 2

, 046 m
Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 15,048

– I

- 40

– 12km

– N Site Established Date 09/ 11/1991

Monitoring Information Pollutant IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective Research Site type( s) Background Monitor type(s) IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model -- Spatial scale Regional Monitor Start Date 09/11/1991

Site Photos

Regional view of Sycamore Canyon Shelter at Sycamore Canyon site

– 11/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 130

### Tonto N atio nal M onument Th e site is jointly operated by ADEQ and USFS. The site is located within the Tonto National Forest at the base of Tonto National Monument, about 40 meters south of SR 188. The area surrounding the site is d esert with Roosevelt Lake about 1 k m to the north

.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 007

- 0010 ADEQ ID 16447 Street Address South of SR 1 88 Roosevelt, AZ 85545 County Gila Groundcover Dirt/Rock

CBSA Payson Latitude 33.6 547 Surrounding Area Desert Longitude

- 111.10 74 Distance to roadway 17 m

– NE

– SR 188 Elevation 7 86 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 800

– SR 188 Site Established Date 04/23/1988

Monitoring Information Pollutant O 3 

### IMPROVE Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison Research Site type(s) Downwind Background Monitor type(s) SLAMS IMPROVE Instrument manufacture and model Teledyne API 400E -- Spatial scale Regional Regional Monitor Start Date 05/22/2002 04/23/1988

Site Photos

Regional view of Tonto NM Shelter at Tonto NM site

– 0 8 /201 3

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 131

### Vehicle Emissions Laboratory The site is located in the northwest corner of the Vehicle Emissions Laboratory property

. The surrounding area is a both residential and commercial , with an open field directly to the northwest

. The site is about 41 5 meters s outh of Red Mountain Freeway (Loop 202).

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 013

- 9998 ADEQ ID 16363 Street Address 600 N. 40 th 

### St. Phoenix, AZ 85008 County Maricopa Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale Latitude 33.4553 Surrounding Area Residential /Commercial Longitude

- 111.9961 Distance to roadway 66 m

– E

– 40 th 

### St. Elevation 35 6 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 10 ,740

– 40 th 

### St. Site Established Date 04/0 1/1987

Monitoring Information Pollutant Bscat/PM2.5 Delta Temp Horizontal Solar Raditation Ultraviolet Solar Radiation Basic monitoring objective Public Information Research Research Research Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- PAMS PAMS PAMS Instrument

ma nufacture and model Optec NGN 2 Nephelometer RM Young 7627 Li

- Cor 200S2 Epply TUVR UV Spatial scale Urban Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 06/25/2003 08/20/2004 06/18/1999 08/20/2004

Monitoring Information Pollutant Temp R/H W ind Basic monitoring objective -- -- Site type(s) Population Exposure Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- -- Instrument manufacture and model Rotronics MP101A

Probe Vaisala HMP155

Probe Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor S tart Date 05/11/1999 05/11/1999

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 132

### Site Photos

Aerial view of Vehicle Emissions Laboratory M eteorol ogical tower, and shelter at VEL

– 12/2012

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 133

### Yuma Supersite The site was reopened in 2008 and has been used to consolidate air quality monitors in the Yuma area to one site

. The site is located on the southeast corner of the Rural Metro Adm inistration Facility property. The surrounding area is commercial and industrial, with a dirt lot adjacent to the south and I

- 8 1 km to the northeast

. In additi on to NAAQS compliance, the site is also used to help understand transport of PM and Ozone.

Site Information AQS ID 04

- 027

- 8011 ADEQ ID 113219 Street Address 2323 S. Arizona Ave. Yuma, AZ 85364 County Yuma Groundcover Gravel

CBSA Yuma Latitude 32.690 3 Surrounding Area Commercial/Industrial Longitude

- 114.6144 Distance to roadway 91 m

– W

– Arizona Ave. Elevation 60 m Traffic count of

Nearest Major Roadway 12,302

– Arizona Ave. Site Established Date 02/01/2006

Monitoring Information Pollutant O 3 

### PM 10 

### PM 2.5 

### Temp/RH Basic monitoring objective NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison NAAQS Comparison -- Site type(s) Max O 3 

### Concentration Population Exposure Regional Transport Population Exposure Monitor type(s) SLAMS SLAMS SLAMS

-- Instrument manufactur e and model Teledyne API 400E Thermo TEOM 1400AB Met One BAM 1020 Vaisala HMP 155 Probe Spatial scale Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 05/06/2008 12/01/2009 01/01/2010 03/17/2010

Monitoring Information Pollutant W ind Basic monitoring objective -- Site type(s) Population Exposure Monitor type(s)

-- Instrument manufacture and model RM Young 5305 Anemometer Spatial scale Neighborhood Monitor Start Date 03/17/2010

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 134

### Site Photos

Aeria l view of Yuma Supersite Shelter and Meteorological Tower at Yuma Supersite

– 4 /201 4

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 135

## Appendix E

– Criteria Pollutant Minimum Monitoring Requirements

This a ppendix contains tables that summarize the criteria pollutant minimum monitoring requirements for each MSA or CBSA that ADEQ is designated as the Primary Quality Assurance Organization (PQAO). Minimum monitoring requirements for the Phoenix

- Mesa

- Scottsdale and Tucson MSAs are not include d within this appendix as ADEQ is not the PQAO for these MSAs.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 136O 3 (Note: Refer to section 4.1 and Table D

- 2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 1. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for O 3 .

MSA County 2010 Census Population 2011

- 2013 8

- hr Design Value (ppb) Design Value S ite # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 6 9 Flagstaff Middle Sc hool 1 1 0 Prescott Yavapai 211,033 6 9 Prescott College AQD 1 1 0 Yuma Yuma 195,751 7 6 Yuma Supersite 1 1 0 Lake Havasu

- Kingman Mohave 200,186 N/A N/A 0 0 0 Sierra Vista

- Douglas Cochise 131,346 N/A N/A 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Alamo Lake, JLG Supersite, Queen Valley , and Tonto Na tional Monument.

_______________________________________________________________________ __
PM 2.5 (Note: Refer to sections 4.7.1, 4.7.2 and Table D

- 5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 2a Mi nimum Monitoring Requirements for PM 2.5 SLAMS . ( FRM/ FEM/ARM

, see 40CFR 58 App D Se ction 4.7.1 and Table D

- 5 )

MSA County 2010 Census Population 2011

- 2013 Annual Design Value ( μg/m 3 ) Annual Design Value S ite 2011

- 2013 Daily Design Value (μg/m 3 ) Daily Design Value S ite # of Required Continuous Monitors # of Active Continuous Monitors # of Additional Continuous Monitors Needed Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5. 3 Flagstaff Middle Schoo l 12 Flagstaff Middle School 0 0 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4. 2 Prescott Valley 10 Prescott Valley 0 0 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.8 Yuma Supersite 1 6 Yuma Supersite 1 1 0

Lake Havasu

Kingman Mohave 200,186 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0

Sierra Vista

- Douglas Cochis e 131,346 6.7 Douglas Red Cross 12 Douglas Red Cross 1 1 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Nogales Post Office.

Table 2 b Minimum Monitoring Requirements for continuous PM 2.5 monitors. (FEM/ARM and non

- FEM, see 40CFR 58 App D Section 4.7. 2)

MSA County 2010 Census Population 2011

- 2013 Annual Design Value (μg/m 3 ) Annual Design Value S ite 2011

- 2013 Daily Design Value (μg/m 3 ) Daily Design Value S ite # of Required Continuous Monitors # of Active Continuous Monitors # of Additional Continuous Mo nitors Needed Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 5.2 Flagstaff Middle School 12 Flagstaff Middle School 0 1* 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 4. 0 Prescott Valley 9 Prescott Valley 0 1 * 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 7.8 Yuma Supersite 15 Yuma Supersite 0 1 0

Lake Havasu

Ki ngman Mohave 200,186 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0

Sierra Vista

- Douglas Cochise 131,346 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0
* Continuous monitors are not FRMs, FEMs, or ARMs Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Nogales Post Office

.

________________________________ _______________________________________ __



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 137PM 10 (Note: Refer to section 4.6 and Table D

- 4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 3. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for PM 10 . MSA County 2010 Census Population 2011

- 2013 Max Concentration [μg/m 3 ] Max Conc entration S ite # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 61 Flagstaff Middle School 0 1 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 90 Prescott Valley 0 1 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 274 Yuma Supersite 1

- 2 1 0

Lake Havasu

- Kingman Mohave 200,186 185 Bullhead City 0

- 1 1 0
Sierra Vista

- Douglas Cochise 131,346 251 Douglas Red Cross 0

- 1 2 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Ajo, Bullhead City, Douglas R ed Cross, Hayden Old Jail, JLG Supersite, Miami Golf Course, Miami Ridgeline, Nogales Post Office, Paul Spur Chemical Lime Plant, Payson Well Site, Rillito, and Yuma Supersite

.

_______________________________________________________________________ __
NO 2 (Note: Refer to section 4.3 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 4. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for NO 2 . CBSA 2010 Census Population 20 10 Max AADT C ounts # of Required Near

- road Monitors # of Active Near

- road Monitors # of Additional Near

- road Monitors Needed # of Required Area

- wide Monitors # of Ac tive Area

- wide Monitors # of Additional Area

- wide Monitors Needed Flagstaff 134,421 40,500 0 0 0 0 0 0

Prescott 211,033 38,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Yuma 195,751 37,000 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lake Havasu

– Kingman 200,186 34,500 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sierra Vista

- Douglas 131,34 6 32,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: None Monitors required for PAMS: JLG Supersite EPA Regional Administrator

- required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.3.4: None

_____________________________________________________________ __________ __
SO 2 (Note: Refer to section 4.4 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 5. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for SO 2 . CBSA County 2010 Census Population 20 11 Total SO 2 1 [tons/year] Population Weighted Emissions Index 2 [million persons

- tons pe r year] # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed Flagstaff Coconino 134,421 10 1.34 0 0 0

Prescott Yavapai 211,033 2000 422 0 0 0

Yuma Yuma 195,751 12.6 2.40 0 0 0

Lake Havasu

– Kingman Mohave 200,186 14.44 2.89 0 0 0

Sierra Vista

- Douglas Cochise 131,346 3922 515 0 0 0

1 Using NEI data
2 Calculated by multiplying CBSA population and total SO 2 and dividing product by one million

Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: Hayden Old Jail and Miami Ridgeline

. EPA Regional Administrator

- required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.4.3: None

_______________________________________________________________________ __



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 138CO (Note: Refer to section 4.2 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 6. Minimum Monitoring Requireme nts for CO. CBSA 2010 Census Population # of Required Near

- Road Monitors # of Active Near

- Road Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed

Flagstaff 134,421 0 0 0

Prescott 211,033 0 0 0

Yuma 195,751 0 0 0

Lake Havasu

– Kingman 200,186 0 0 0

Sierra Vis ta

- Douglas 131,346 0 0 0 Monitors required for SIP or Maintenance Plan: JLG Supersite EPA Regional Administrator

- required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App.D 4.2.2: None

_____________________________________________________________________________
Pb (Note: Refer to section 4.5 of Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58)

Table 7a. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Pb at NCore. NCore Site CBSA 2010 Census Population # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed

JLG Supersite State

- wi de Requirement 4,192,887 1 1 0

Table 7b. Minimum Source

- Oriented Pb Monitoring above 0.5 Tons Per Year (including airports) 1

Source Name Address Pb Emissions (tons per

year) Emission Inventory Source & Data Year Max 3

- Month Design Value* [μg/m 3 ] Design Value D ate (third month, year) # of Required Monitors # of Active Monitors # of Additional Monitors Needed

ASARCO LLC

-- 3.8 7 ADEQ 201 1 0.27 June, 2011 1 1 0
Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. -- 4

. 8 7 ADEQ 201 1 0.06 April , 2011 1 1 0

Ernest A. Love Field -- 0.89 NEI 2011

-- -- 0 0 0

Falcon Field

-- 0.77 NEI 2011

-- -- 0 0 0
Chandler Municipal -- 0.58 NEI 2011

-- -- 0 0 0
Phoenix Goodyear

-- 0.50 NEI 2011

-- -- 0 0 0
Phoenix Deer Valley 2 -- 1.16 NEI 2011

- - -- 0 0 0 *consider data from the past 3 years.
1 Monitoring Required on all non

- airport sources above 0.5 TPY and on Airports above 1.0 TPY
2 Phoenix Deer Valley is not on the list of Airports to be monitored for Pb Monitors required for SIP or Maintenan ce Plan: None EPA Regional Administrator

- required monitors per 40 CFR 58, App. D 4.5(c): None



### State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 139

## Appendix F

– Letter to EPA

This appendix contains one letter to EPA. The letter is ADEQ ’s Request for Siting Criteria Waiver at the JLG Supersite

.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4 , Page 140

### July 1, 2014

Deborah Jordan, Air Division Director U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 Air

- 1 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

Subject : A DEQ Request for Siting Criteria Waiver JLG Supersite

Dear Ms. Jordan:

The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) is submitting the Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 201 4

. There is one site that do es not meet the distance from the nearest road or distance from trees requirements as specified in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix E

. This letter is to request EPA to waive the monitoring site requirements for the JLG Supersite

. . Below is information that ADEQ has considered in the determination that this monitoring site is as representative as it would be if the siting criteria were being met.

JLG Supers it e The JLG Supersite was est ablished in 1993 in a central Phoenix neighborhood. Today, after 2 1
years , the site remains largely the same. Monitors and inlets are located on the roof of the shelters, while temperature sensitive analyzers and data loggers are in side the air

- conditioned shelter s. The neighboring houses remain largely the same except for the trees in the yards adjacent to the site

. The required distance from trees to probe is >10 meters. There is now a tree drip line within 10
meters on 1 sides of the site shelter

. The PM10

, PM2.5 (continuous and filter

- based) , Carbonyl, VOC, SVOC, and Pb inlets are <10 meters from the closest tree drip line. The SO2, O3, NO2, and CO inlets are currently exactly 10 meters from the close t tree drip line. This has the potential to be < 10 meters as the tree grows. The tree is located i n the SSE direction from the inlet whereas the prevailing wind di rection comes from the SW during the season of highest concentration (summer) , therefore the tree has negligible im pact on monitoring at the site. ADEQ has found that these monitor probes cannot reasonably be re located so as to meet the siting criteria bec ause of the physical constraints of the site

.

### Page 2 of 2

The JLG Supersite has monitors for NAAQS (CO, NO 2 

### , O 3 

### , SO 2 

### , Pb, PM 10 

### , PM 2.5 

### ), NCore, PAMS, NATTS, Toxics, IMPROVE, and meteorology. The cost of site relocation would be substantial.

ADEQ has reviewed sev eral options

. Based on the long standing historical trends , the lack of cost benefit for moving the site, the constraints o f the site for modification of the probes, the low ADT of the adjacent road, the prevailing wind direction coming from the SW, and that the probes location s are just shy of the required distances for trees

, ADEQ is requesting a siting criteria waiver from EPA for the placement of the PM 2.5 

### continuous PM 2.5 

### filter

- based, and PM 10 

### continuous , Carbonyl, VOC, SVOC, and Pb instruments located at JLG Supersite regarding the distance from tree line siting criteria listed in 40CFR Part 58 Appendix E.

We appreciate the effort by EPA in the review of this waiver request for air monitoring siting. If you have any questions, please contact Theresa Rigney at (602) 771

- 2274.

Sincerely,

Eric C. Massey, Director Air Quality Division

c

c: Meredith Kurpius , USEPA, Region 9 Michael Flagg, USEPA, Region 9 Theresa Rigney, ADEQ

## Appendix G

– Interagency Air Quality Monitoring for Arizona

This appendix contains a proposed document between State and local air monitoring agencies in Arizona

to outline the responsibilities delineated to each agency

. As it s tands, this document is not in

- place and has not been approved by each State or local agency. Each State or local agency will receive forthcoming guidance from the EPA for this document in t he following year after the 2014 Network Plan has been published. This is only intend ed for informational purposes and is included per the request of EPA Region 9.

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 143

### Interagency Air Quality Monitoring for the State of Arizona

Purpose :
40 CFR Part 58 App endix D(e) states that “ Full monitoring requirements apply separately to each affected State or local agency in the absence of an agreement between the affected agencies and the EPA Regional Administrator.” EPA Region 9 indicated in their response to the 2 013 Network Plan that an interagency document should be in place to delineate the share d monitoring requirements by overlapping agencies

. This document is to fulfill this CFR requirement

, to clarify the monitoring requirements being met by each agency

, and to support requirements for the monitoring networ ks in Arizona.

The following table outlines Minimum Monitoring Requirements in the State of Arizona as required in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D . This does not take into account the breadth of monitoring that is required by the EPA Regional Administrator for the design of a complet e monitoring program

. Each State or local agency must work with the EPA Regional Administrator to dev elop a monitoring program for their area.

This document illustrates the minimum mo nitoring requirements as outlined in Table 1 between all agencies in Arizona. Each agency is responsible for all other monitoring requirements not listed in Table 1 as stated in 40 CFR Part 58 for their area. Each area is defined as a specific Metropolitan Statistical Area or as a State

- wide area.

Agencies involved :
Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD)

Pinal County Air Quality Control District (PCAQCD)

Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ)

Arizona Depa rtment of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 144Table 1: Minimum Monitoring Requirements in Arizona

State of Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2014, Page 145