alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2 Termination of Employment Agreement








Exhibit 10.2
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
TERMINATION AGREEMENT
This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of the ___ day of April, 2013, is entered into by and between The Wet Seal, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Steven H. Benrubi (“Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of August 3, 2010 (the “Employment Agreement”);
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to terminate the Employment Agreement as of the date hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree as follows:
1.Termination.  The Employment Agreement is terminated effective as of the date hereof.  The Executive’s employment with the Company is intended to continue on an “at will” basis after the date of this Agreement.
2.    Survival of Obligations.  Except for the obligation under the Employment Agreement to pay base compensation pursuant to Section 3 that was due, and not paid, prior to the date hereof, and the stock option and restricted stock awards granted pursuant to Sections 3.3 and 3.4, no covenants, terms or conditions of the Employment Agreement shall survive the termination specified in paragraph 1 above.  
3.    Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be construed under and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to its principles of conflicts of laws.
4.    Counterparts.  This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts and by facsimile or other electronic means each of which shall be deemed an original and shall have the same effect as if the signatures hereto and thereto were on the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
THE WET SEAL, INC.  
 
By:      
Name:     
Title:     
 
EXECUTIVE: 
 
/s/ Steven H. Benrubi     
Steven H. Benrubi
§ 15a.405 Housing. ( a ) *Generally.* A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, apply different rules or regulations, impose different fees or requirements, or offer different services or benefits related to housing, except as provided in this section (including housing provided only to married students).
( b ) *Housing provided by recipient.* ( 1 ) A recipient may provide separate housing on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) Housing provided by a recipient to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, shall be as a whole: ( i ) Proportionate in quantity to the number of students of that sex applying for such housing; and
( ii ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( c ) *Other housing.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, administer different policies or practices concerning occupancy by its students of housing other than that provided by such recipient.
( 2 ) ( i ) A recipient which, through solicitation, listing, approval of housing, or otherwise, assists any agency, organization, or person in making housing available to any of its students, shall take such reasonable action as may be necessary to assure itself that such housing as is provided to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, is as a whole: ( A ) Proportionate in quantity; and
( B ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( ii ) A recipient may render such assistance to any agency, organization, or person that provides all or part of such housing to students of only one sex.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Parental Incarceration and Children in Nonparental Care      

# Report: Parental Incarceration and Children in Nonparental Care

This brief compares children in nonparental care as a result of parental incarceration with those who experienced parental incarceration but not as a reason for nonparental care, and those with no experience of parental incarceration. 

http://aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/parental-incarceration-and-children-nonparental-care?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports
#### § 1780.8 [Reserved]
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, David Shaw, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the report based on such evaluation;and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: November 10, 2006   /s/ David Shaw   David Shaw  Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, James F. Cleary, Jr.and Mary Patricia B. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto our knowledge:

 
|        |   | (1) |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                    |
|--------|--------|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | (2) |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in  the Report. |

 

 

May 1, 2008

 

 

 
| /s/ James F. Cleary, Jr. |     |
|-------------------------------|----------|
| James F. Cleary, Jr.     |     |
| *Chief Executive Officer*     | * * |
|                          |     |
|                          |     |
| /s/ Mary Patricia B. Thompson |     |
| Mary Patricia B. Thompson     |     |
| *Chief Financial Officer*     | * * |

 

----
July 28, 2011 

Mr. Edward J. Bennett 

School Director 

Teterboro School of Aeronautics 

80 Moonachie Avenue 

Teterboro, NJ 07608 

Dear Mr. Bennett: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t 

process your request and tells you what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can’t Process Your Request

We entered your June 14, 2011, exemption request for Teterboro School of Aeronautics 

(Teterboro) into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0638), but we are unable to process your 

request any further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 

14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us 

all of the following: 

 The reasons granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would 

provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an 

exemption. 

 Any more information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 
2 

If We Don’t Hear From You 

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without telling you further. 

If you have any questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft and 

 Airports Rules Division

Enclosure
M. P. No. 79-411.

#### Burt A. Jordan *v.*Ann Jordan.

*Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Alfred Factor,*for defendant-petitioner, *Robert J. Fallon,*Legal Counsel, Child Welfare Services, *James A. Farrell, Jr.,*Guardian Ad Litem for Arthur and Emily Jordan.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. *Aram A. Arabian,*for plaintiff-respondent.
#### §§ 1737.43-1737.49 [Reserved]
§ 1493.340 Proof of entry. ( a ) *Diversion.* The diversion of goods covered by an FGP payment guarantee to a destination country other than that shown on the payment guarantee is prohibited, unless expressly authorized in writing by the Director.
( b ) *Records of proof of entry.* ( 1 ) Sellers must obtain and maintain records of an official or customary commercial nature that demonstrate the arrival of the goods sold in connection with the FGP in the destination country. At the Director's request, the seller must submit to CCC records demonstrating proof of entry. Records demonstrating proof of entry must be in English or be accompanied by a certified or other translation acceptable to CCC. Records acceptable to meet this requirement include an original certification of entry signed by a duly authorized customs or port official of the destination country, by an agent or representative of the vessel or shipline that delivered the goods to the destination country, or by a private surveyor in the destination country, or other documentation deemed acceptable by the Director showing: ( i ) That the good(s) entered the destination country;
( ii ) The identification of the export carrier;
( iii ) The quantity of the good(s);
( iv ) A description of the good(s); and
( v ) The date(s) and place(s) of unloading of the good(s) in the destination country.
( 2 ) Where shipping documents (*e.g.,* bills of lading) clearly demonstrate that the goods were shipped to the destination country, proof of entry verification may be provided by the buyer.
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Fitmedia Inc. for the three months ended November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yichun Jiang, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, certify that:

* the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

* information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial condition and results of operations.

/s/ Yichun JiangYichun JiangChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer



|January 21, 2008
|----------------

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---
M. P. No. 79-444.

#### State *v.*Joseph E. Roque.

Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.

*Dennis J. Roberts II,*Attorney General, *Stephen Lichatin III,*Special Assistant Attorney General, Chief, Appellate Division, for plaintiff-respondent, *Lynch b Coleman, John D. Lynch,*for defendant-petitioner.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
#### § 15a.200 Application.

Except as provided in §§ 15a.205 through 15a.235(a), this part applies to every recipient and to each education program or activity operated by such recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 10, 2011
    By:
    /s/    Edward J. WhalenEdward J. Whalen,President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 10, 2011
    By:
    /s/   Joseph E. McNeelyJoseph E. McNeely,Vice President, Finance,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of H-Lines Finance Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Charles G. Raymond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    CHARLES G.
RAYMOND                                                             
|Charles G. Raymond President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

October 30, 2006
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 78



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I No. E-13-692 TNT CABLE CONTRACTORS, INC. APPELLANT V. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, AND CHRIS SINGLETON APPELLEES Opinion Delivered FEBRUARY 11, 2015 APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS BOARD OF REVIEW [NO. 2013-BR-01144]

REBRIEFING ORDERED

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge Appellant TNT Cable Contractors, Inc. (TNT), appeals the Board of Review’s decision to award unemployment benefits to appellee Chris Singleton. On appeal, TNT contends that Singleton was an independent contractor rather than an employee, and therefore not eligible for unemployment benefits; that Singleton committed misconduct associated with his work; and that Singleton refused to accept alternative suitable jobs rather than be discharged. For the reasons discussed below, this case must be remanded for rebriefing. TNT’s abstract of Singleton’s testimony consisted of six sentences: My name is Chris Singleton. I performed work for TNT. I took my Form 1099s and receipts or my business expenses to my tax preparer. I used my personal vehicle to perform work for TNT. TNT did not reimburse me for expenses associated with that vehicle. I could no longer perform services for Suddenlink in Oklahoma because I made an unprofessional joke to a dispatcher.Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 78

In contrast, the record reflects that Singleton’s testimony spanned thirty-five pages and, in some instances, it was diametrically opposed to testimony from TNT’s president, Tony Hagedorn. Rule 4-2(a)(5) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals of the State of Arkansas provides: The appellant shall create an abstract of the material parts of all the transcripts (stenographically reported material) in the record. Information in a transcript is material if the information is essential for the appellate courts to confirm its jurisdiction, to understand the case, and to decide the issues on appeal. Singleton’s testimony was clearly persuasive to the Appeal Tribunal and to the Board of Review, which adopted part of the Appeal Tribunal’s opinion as its own. Therefore, the entirety of Singleton’s testimony, not just the testimony that tends to support TNT’s argument, is material to the understanding of this case and to decide the issues on appeal. See Trucks For You, Inc. v. Director , 2014 Ark. App. 622, 447 S.W.3d 148. We remand for rebriefing. TNT’s substituted abstract, addendum, and brief shall be due no more than fifteen days from the date of this opinion. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3). Rebriefing ordered. ABRAMSON and H ARRISON , JJ., agree. K & L Gates LLP , by: John M. Farrell ; and Kutak Rock LLP , by: James M. Gary , for appellant. Phyllis A. Edwards , for appellee.

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                   22
<SECURITIES>                              2
<RECEIVABLES>                         5,459
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                          39,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     76,900
<PP&E>                               20,305
<DEPRECIATION>                       17,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      172,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               429,649
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            499,951
<OTHER-SE>                         (756,659)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        172,941
<SALES>                             121,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    121,310
<CGS>                                18,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        18,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    407,893
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   25,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (330,440)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (330,440)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (330,440)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.03)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


EXCHANGE ACT RULE 15d-14(b)
AND


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350




In
connection with the Annual Report of Primal Solutions, Inc. (the ”Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph
R. Simrell, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:




i.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




ii.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Primal Solutions, Inc. and will be retained
by Primal Solutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/
      Joseph R. SimrellJoseph
      R. SimrellChief
      Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial
    OfficerPrimal
      Solutions, Inc.April
      15, 2008