alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 24.01**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

(Form 10-K)

 

Theundersigned, a Director of Ceridian Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),does hereby make, nominate and appoint RONALD L. TURNER and GARY M. NELSON, andeach of them, to be my attorney-in-fact for three months from the date hereof,with full power and authority to execute for and on behalf of the undersignedthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2004, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; provided that such Form 10-Kis first reviewed by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of theCompany and by my attorney-in-fact, and his name, when thus signed, shall havethe same force and effect as though I had manually signed such Form 10-K.

 

I havesigned this Power of Attorney as of January 21, 2005.

 

 
|   | /s/ William J. Cadogan         |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   | William J. Cadogan             |
|   |                           |
|   | /s/ Nicholas D. Chabraja       |   |
|   | Nicholas D. Chabraja           |
|   |                           |
|   | /s/ Ronald T. LeMay            |   |
|   | Ronald T. LeMay                |
|   |                           |
|   | /s/ George R. Lewis            |   |
|   | George R. Lewis                |
|   |                           |
|   | /s/ Carole J. Uhrich Shapazian |   |
|   | Carole J. Uhrich Shapazian     |
|   |                           |
|   | /s/ Alan F. White              |   |
|   | Alan F. White                  |

 

----
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46250

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

CORY L. ALVARADO ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: March 19, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Washington County. Hon. Susan E. Wiebe , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for malicious injury to or destruction of a jail

, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before HUSKEY, Judge; LORELLO, Judge; and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Cory L. Alvarado pleaded guilty to felony malicious injury to or destruction of jail , Idaho

Code § 18

- 7018 . The district court imposed a unified five

- year sentence, with three years

determinate

. Alvarado appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

fact ors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2 d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing2 the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Alvarado ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21-1


                           THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       JURISDICTION IN
     NAME                                              WHICH ORGANIZED
     ------------------------------------------------  -------------------
     <S>                                               <C>
     Navigators Insurance Company                        New York
     NIC Insurance Company                               New York
     Somerset Marine, Inc.                               New York
     Somerset of Georgia, Inc.                           Georgia
     Somerset Insurance Services of Texas, Inc.          Texas
     Somerset Insurance Services of California, Inc.     California
     Somerset Insurance Services of Washington, Inc.     Washington
     Somerset Property, Inc.                             New York
     Somerset Re Management, Inc.                        Delaware
     Navigators Management Corporation                   New York
     Somerset Casualty Agency, Inc.                      New York
     Somerset Marine Aviation Property Managers, Inc.    New Jersey
     Somerset Asia Pacific Pty Limited                   Sydney, Australia
     Somerset Marine (UK) Limited                        London, UK
     Navigators Corporate Underwriters, Ltd.             London, UK
</TABLE>
Exhibit 21

 

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

       Certain of Phosphate Resource Partners Limited Partnership's subsidiaries are listed below.  These subsidiaries are all included in the Company's consolidated financial statements, and collectively, together withPhosphate Resource Partners Limited Partnership, account for more than 90 percent of consolidated net sales, earnings (loss) before income taxes, extraordinary items and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principal, and total assets.

 

| * *               | *State of Organization* | *Name Under Which it Does Business* |
|------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| IMC Phosphates Company | Delaware                | Same                                |
| IMC Phosphates MP Inc. | Delaware                | Same                                |

 

 

*Return to Phosphate Resource Partners Limited PartnershipForm 10-K*
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the amended quarterly report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated:  August 20, 2007 | s/Richard Smith_______________________

Richard Smith, Chief Financial Officer |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certifications

I, Shouren Zhao, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Fitmedia Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the Registrant's board of directors (performing the functions of an audit committee):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls (all of which do not apply); and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls, (all of which do not apply).

Date: January 21, 2008
     
     /s/ Shouren ZhaoShouren Zhao 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


---
#### §§ 1767.72-1767.85 [Reserved]
§ 1752.13 Reamortization of or rescheduling of the debt payments. A reamortization or rescheduling of debt payments may be approved subject to the conditions set forth in this section. In order to request a reamortization or rescheduling of debt payments, the Borrower must make a showing that the Borrower does not have access to other sources of capital or alternatives for resolving the delinquency, and that the reamortization or rescheduling of debt payment will cure any existing or projected delinquency. Reamortizations or rescheduling of debt will be limited to 10 years beyond the original maturity date. Additionally, the following requirements must be met, as determined by RUS: ( a ) The Borrower has cooperated with RUS in exploring alternative servicing options and has acted in good faith with regard to eliminating the delinquency and complying with its loan agreements and Agency regulations;
( b ) Any management deficiencies identified by RUS have been corrected or the Borrower has submitted a plan acceptable to RUS to correct any deficiencies;
( c ) The Borrower has presented a budget which clearly indicates that it is able to meet the proposed payment schedule and the reamortization or rescheduling of debt payments will ensure the continued financial viability of the Borrower;
( d ) The Agency will consider the useful life of the facilities along with the level of debt service payments that the Borrower can contribute when determining the appropriate term to place on any reamortized loan; and
( e ) Such other conditions as may be imposed by the Agency on a case-by-case basis, as determined by RUS.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to American Packaging Corporation of Rochester, New York, an exclusive license to U.S. Patent No. 7,387,205, “Packaging System for Preserving Perishable Items”, issued on June 17, 2008.

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before December 16, 2010.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        June Blalock of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above;                         *telephone:*                         301-504-5989.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Government's patent rights in this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public interest to so license this invention as American Packaging Corporation of Rochester, New York has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,

Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2010-28809 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
120 STAT. 312 PUBLIC LAW 109–204—MAR. 20, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2320:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Mar. 2, 3, 6, 7, considered and passed Senate.

Mar. 15, 16, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–204

109th Congress

An Act

To make available funds included in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 for the

Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program for fiscal year 2006, and for other

purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDS FOR LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE

PROGRAM.

Section 9001 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 is amended—

(1) in subsection (a)—

(A) by striking ‘‘for a 1-time only obligation and

expenditure’’;

(B) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘$250,000,000 for

fiscal year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘$500,000,000 for fiscal

year 2006’’; and

(C) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘$750,000,000 for

fiscal year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘$500,000,000 for fiscal

year 2006’’;

(2) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c);

(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:

‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—None of the funds made available under this

section may be used for the planning and administering described

in section 2605(b)(9) of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance

Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 8624(b)(9)).’’; and

(4) in subsection (c) (as redesignated by paragraph (2)),

by striking ‘‘September 30, 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘September

30, 2006’’.

Approved March 20, 2006.

Ante, p. 183.

Mar. 20, 2006

[S. 2320]
#### §§ 1737.4-1737.9 [Reserved]
STATE OF RHODE ISLANDAND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE OF AIR RESOURCES
I PUBLIC HEARING IN RE: RI REGIONAL HAZE STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVISION

JULY 30, 2009 10:00A.M

. 235 PROMENADE STREET PROVIDENCE, RI
HEARING OFFICER: DOUGLAS McVAY, Acting Chief BARBARA MORIN, Supervising Environmental Scientist



# COPY

IRONS &ASSOCIATES ~ ~----- Certified Professional Stenographers Cfd,r'aC);

31 Harris Avenue - Portsmouth, RI 02871 

### (401) 683-1930 FAX (401) 683-52952 1 ~II HEARING OFFICER: Good morning
. Today is 2 IIIII Thursday, July 30, 2000
. My name is Douglas McVay
. 3 I'mthe Acting Chief of DEMOffice of Air Resources
. I I 4 I, will be the hearing officer for today's public hearing
. 5 With me on the hearing panel is Barbara Morin, 6,I Supervising Environmental Scientist with DEM's Office of Air Resources
. I' We're here today regarding a public hearing 91II concerning the adoption of the proposed Rhode Island 10 Iii Regional Haze State Implementation Plan Revision
. This 11 IIIIII~ SIP revision addresses EPA requirements that states 12 IIII that contribute to visibility impairment in one or more 13 !I federal class 1 areas prepare plans consistent with the 14 IIII national goal of restoring visibility in those areas to 15 '' natural conditions
. Although Rhode Island does not 16have any class 1 areas, EPA has determined that 17 emissions fromsources in the state contribute to 18 'I1i visibility impairment in Class 1 areas in nearby '~ 19~ states. 20 This hearing is being conducted under the , 21 : authority of Chapters 23-23 and 42-17.1 of the General 22 II Laws of Rhode Island and in accordance with the 23'IIi requirements for preparation, adoption and submittal of 24 i',, state implementation plans in 40 CFR Part 51.102 and3 1 j 51.302
. I I 2 ~ In accordance with these procedures, a public , 3 I notice of this hearing was published in The Providence I 4 Journal on 30 June 2009
. The purpose of the hearing is 5 to afford interested parties an opportunity to submit 6 comments orally and/or in writing on the proposed , 7 II,

10j 11 12 13,, 14 15 iI 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Regional Haze Plan
.

Making note that there are no people in attendance II for this hearing, I declare the hearing closed
. I,ill

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND ) COUNTY OF PROVIDENCE ) 4

I, Francine I
. Brelsford, Certified 4 I Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public, County of 5 ,I Providence, State of Rhode Island, do hereby certify 6 I~ that the foregoing Hearing was taken before me at the 7 II'i time and place hereinbefore set forth
. 8 ~~II~I I further certify that said hearing was 9 ;i reported by me stenographically; subsequently with 10 computer-aided transcription, produced under my 11 direction and supervision; and that the foregoing is a 12 IIII full, true, and correct transcript of my original 13 III~' shorthand notes
. 14 I INWITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my 15 II~ hand and seal this day of 2001
. 16 17 I 

### 18 l Francine I
. Brelsford, CSR 19Certified Shorthand Reporter Notary Public, County of Providenc 20 ; State of Rhode Island
. 21 I',I My Commission Expires: 6/27/ 22II 23 II',I~I

, 24
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Radva Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:


1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:             March 22, 2004                 /s/ Luther I. Dickens
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Luther I. Dickens
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

Date:             March 22, 2004                 /s/ William F. Fry
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 William F. Fry
                                                 Vice President-
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
2006-0767.

#### Floss v. Culver.

Ashtabula App. No. 2004-A-0014, 2006-Ohio-197. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 2005-2399 and 2006-0249, *Mid-Am. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Heasley,*Lake App. No. 2004-L-115, 2005-Ohio-6072; cause consolidated with 2006-0505, *Floss v. Culver,*Ashtabula App. No. 2004-A-0014, 2006-Ohio-197; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
EXHIBIT 99.1



INNOVA PURE WATER, INC.

SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS

CODE OF ETHICS



GENERAL PHILOSOPHY



The chief executive officer and the chief financial officer (collectively "Senior Financial Officers") are responsible for the integrity of Innova, Inc. ("Innova") financial reporting and system of internal accounting and controls.  The honesty, integrity and sound judgment of each Senior Financial Officer is fundamental to the reputation and success of Innova.



While all employees, officers, and directors are required to adhere to the Innova Code of Ethics, the professional and ethical conduct of Senior Financial Officers is essential to the proper function and success of Innova.



SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS CODE OF ETHICS



To the best of their knowledge, each Senior Financial Officer of Innova must:



(i)

Act with honesty and integrity, avoid actual or apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships.



(ii)

Not put their personal interests ahead of the interests of Innova or its shareholders.



(iii)

Provide colleagues with information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable.



(iv)

Comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations of federal, state and local governments (both United States and foreign) and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies.



(v)

Act in good faith, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing independent judgment to be subordinated.



(vi)

Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of employment.



(vii)

Share knowledge and maintain skills necessary and relevant to Innova's needs.



(viii)

Proactively promote ethical and honest behavior within the Innova environment.



(ix)

Assure responsible use of and control of all assets, resources and information of Innova.



Each Senior Financial Officer is expected to adhere to the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers at all times.  The board of directors shall have the sole and absolute authority to approve any deviation or waiver from the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers.  Any waiver and the grounds for such waiver for a Senior Financial Officer shall be promptly disclosed through a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K.  Additionally, any change of this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers shall be promptly disclosed to shareholders.





#355949 v1 - INNOVA PURE 10K