alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T APRI L 7, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
N o

. 0 8

- 1 1 6 4 5 N o n

- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 0

- 0 0 0 5 6

- C R

- H L M

- 4

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A
,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

A U T R Y J A M E S F O S T E R , a

. k

. a

. A r c h i e F o s t e r ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f G e o r g i a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( A p r i l 7 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e B L A C K , B A R K E T T a n d P R Y O R , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.

P E R C U R I A M :

A u t r y J a m e s F o s t e r a p p e a l s t h e d e n i a l o f h i s m o t i o n t o r e d u c e h i s s e n t e n c e

.1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 )

. T h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t r u l e d t h a t F o s t e r w a s i n e l i g i b l e f o r r e l i e f

u n d e r A m e n d m e n t 7 0 6 b e c a u s e h e w a s s e n t e n c e d a s a c a r e e r o f f e n d e r

. W e a f

f i r m

.

T h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t d i d n o t e r r b y d e n y i n g F o s t e r ’ s m o t i o n

. F o s t e r a r g u e s t h a t

t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t w a s e n t i t l e d t o r e d u c e h i s s e n t e n c e b e c a u s e t h e b a s e o f f e n s e l e v e l

f o r h i s u n d e r l y i n g c r a c k c o c a i n e o f f e n s e s h a s b e e n a l t e r e d b y A m e n d m e n t 7 0 6
, b u t

h i s a r g u m e n t i s f

o r e c l o s e d b y o u r d e c i s i o n i n U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. M o o r e , 5 4 1 F

. 3 d

1 3 2 3
, 1 3 3 0 ( 1 1 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 8 )
, b e c a u s e F o s t e r w a s s e n t e n c e d a s a c a r e e r o f f e n d e r

.

F o s t e r a l s o a r g u e s t h a t t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t h a d d i s c r e t i o n t o r e d u c e h i s s e n t e n c e b e l o w

t h e a m e n d e d r a n g e u n d e r U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. B o o k e r , 5 4 3 U

. S

. 2 2 0
, 1 2 5 S

. C t

. 7 3 8

( 2 0 0 5 )
, b u t B o o k e r c a n n o t b e u s e d a s a n i n d e p e n d e n t b a s i s t o r e d u c e a s e n t e n c e

.

S e e U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. J o n e s , 5 4 8 F

. 3 d 1 3 6 6
, 1 3 6 9 ( 1 1 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 8 )

.

T h e d e n i a l o f F o s t e r ’ s m o t i o n f o r a r e d u c e d s e n t e n c e i s A F F I R M E D

.

2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1928 

To clarify the calculation of cohort default rates for proprietary institutions 

of higher education under the Higher Education Act of 1965. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 9, 2013 

Ms. DELAURO (for herself, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. SCHWARTZ, and Mr. TAKANO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To clarify the calculation of cohort default rates for proprietary institutions of higher education under the Higher 

Education Act of 1965. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Proprietary Institution 

5 of Higher Education Accountability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF COHORT DEFAULT RATE. 

7 Section 435(m)(1) of the Higher Education Act of 

8 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1085(m)(1)) is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1928 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting after the 

2 first sentence the following: ‘‘In calculating the co3 hort default rate for a proprietary institution of 

4 higher education, the Secretary shall treat current 

5 and former students at the institution who have 

6 been granted, on loans made under part D and re7 ceived for attendance at the institution, a forbear8 ance or deferment described in subparagraph (D) for 

9 any period exceeding 6-months after entering repay10 ment on such loans and before the end of the second 

11 fiscal year following the fiscal year in which such 

12 students entered such repayment, as students who 

13 have defaulted on such loans before the end of such 

14 second fiscal year.’’; and 

15 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub16 paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(D) For purposes of subparagraph (B)— 

18 ‘‘(i) the term ‘forbearance’ means a 

19 forbearance granted for a reason described 

20 in subparagraph (A)(i)(II) or subpara21 graph (B) of section 428(c)(3); and 

22 ‘‘(ii) the term ‘deferment’ means a 

23 deferment granted for a reason described 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1928 IH

1 in subparagraph (B) or (D) of section 

2 455(f)(2).’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### §§ 1778.32-1778.33 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 169 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 169

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of 
     initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2013

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Labor Relations Act to require the arbitration of 
     initial contract negotiation disputes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Labor Relations First Contract 
Negotiations Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. INITIAL CONTRACT DISPUTES.

    Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h)(1) If, not later than 60 days after the certification of a 
new representative of employees for the purpose of collective 
bargaining, the employer of the employees and the representative have 
not reached a collective bargaining agreement with respect to the terms 
and conditions of employment, the employer and the representative shall 
jointly select a mediator to mediate those issues on which the employer 
and the representative cannot agree.
    ``(2) If the employer and the representative are unable to agree 
upon a mediator, either party may request the Federal Mediation and 
Conciliation Service to select a mediator and the Federal Mediation and 
Conciliation Service shall upon the request select a person to serve as 
mediator.
    ``(3) If, not later than 30 days after the date of the selection of 
a mediator under paragraph (1) or (2), the employer and the 
representative have not reached an agreement, the employer or the 
representative may transfer the matters remaining in controversy to the 
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service for binding arbitration.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Nova Natural Resources Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, David Putnam, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge
      that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods shown in such report.









Date:  October
      14,
      2007                                                        By:     /s/
      David Putnam


David
      Putman, Chief
      Executive


Officer
#### § 1780.82 [Reserved]
#### § 1789.162 Indemnification agreement.

As a condition of approving Borrower funding, the government will require the Borrower to enter into an Indemnification Agreement, in form and substance satisfactory to RUS, providing that the Borrower will indemnify and hold harmless the government and any officers, agents or employees of the government from any and all liability, including costs, fees, and settlements arising out of, or in any way connected with the payment of the Consultant's fee pursuant to the Consultant Contract. The Indemnification Agreement may recognize, as a condition of liability thereunder, the rights of the borrower to prompt notice, to use of counsel of its own choosing, and to participation in any settlement of a claim against which indemnification is sought.
Exhibit 21-1
The Navigators Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries of the Registrant at December 31, 2006

|Name                                                                                              |  | Jurisdiction in
which organized
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Navigators Insurance Company                                                                      |  | New York                       
|NIC Insurance Company (name changed on January 4, 2007 to Navigators Specialty Insurance Company) |  | New York                       
|Navigators Management Company, Inc.                                                               |  | New York                       
|Navigators Insurance Services of Texas, Inc.                                                      |  | Texas                          
|Navigators Special Risk, Inc.                                                                     |  | Texas                          
|Navigators California Insurance Services, Inc.                                                    |  | California                     
|Navigators Insurance Services of Washington, Inc.                                                 |  | Washington                     
|Navigators Management (UK) Ltd.                                                                   |  | United Kingdom                 
|Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd.                                                            |  | United Kingdom                 
|Navigators Holdings (UK) Ltd.                                                                     |  | United Kingdom                 
|Navigators Underwriting Agency Ltd.                                                               |  | United Kingdom                 
|Millennium Underwriting Ltd.                                                                      |  | United Kingdom                 
|Navigators Underwriting Limited                                                                   |  | United Kingdom                 
|Navigators NV                                                                                     |  | Belgium                        

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                 KENT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                         (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIO)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Fiscal years ended
                                        ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           April 1,          March 30,         March 29,          March 28,         April 3,
                                             1995              1996             1997(1)             1998              1999
                                        ---------------   ---------------   ----------------   ---------------   ---------------
<S>                                     <C>               <C>               <C>                <C>               <C>
Earnings before income taxes                    $23,511           $49,095           $45,100            $58,167           $   294
Add fixed charges                                 1,085             1,857             2,363              6,647            12,009
                                                -------           -------           -------            -------           -------
Earnings as adjusted                             24,596            50,952            47,463             64,814            12,303
                                                =======           =======           =======            =======           =======
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                  340               898             1,192              5,272            10,495
  Interest portion of rental                        745               959             1,171              1,375             1,514
    expense(2)                                  -------           -------           -------            -------           -------
Total fixed charges                             $ 1,085           $ 1,857           $ 2,363            $ 6,647           $12,009
                                                =======           =======           =======            =======           =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                22.7x             27.4x             20.1x               9.8x              1.0x
                                                =======           =======           =======            =======           =======
</TABLE>

(1)  Includes non-recurring merger and integration charges of $5.5 million, pre-
     tax, in fiscal year 1997.  Exclusive of such charges, the ratio of earnings
     to fixed charges for fiscal year 1997 was 22.4.

(2)  The interest factor of rental expense is estimated at one-third of total
     rental expense, which the Company believes to be a reasonable
     approximation.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Life Sciences Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2007 (the “Report”),I, Michael T. Flavin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934to the extent applicable; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|        | Date:  November 14, 2007               |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |                                        |
|   |                                        |
|   | /s/  Michael T. Flavin                      |
|   | Michael  T. Flavin                          |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer                    |
|   | Advanced  Life Sciences Holdings, Inc. |

 

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1950 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent discriminatory misconduct 

against taxpayers by Federal officers and employees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 13, 2013 

Mr. TURNER (for himself, Mr. MICA, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. BONNER, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. 

SCHWEIKERT, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. 

FITZPATRICK, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. LANCE, 

Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. FINCHER, Mr. 

FARENTHOLD, Mr. ROSS, Mr. SALMON, and Mr. MEEHAN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, 

and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent discriminatory misconduct against taxpayers by Federal officers 

and employees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Non5 discrimination & Protection Act of 2013’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1950 IH

1 SEC. 2. MISCONDUCT AGAINST TAXPAYERS BY INTERNAL 

2 REVENUE SERVICE EMPLOYEES. 

3 (a) CRIMINAL LIABILITY.—Chapter 13 of title 18, 

4 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘§ 250. Misconduct against taxpayers by Internal Rev7 enue Service employees 

8 ‘‘Whoever being an employee of the Internal Revenue 

9 Service, engages, during the performance of that employ10 ee’s official duties, in an act or omission described in sec11 tion 1203(b) of the Internal Revenue Service Restruc12 turing and Reform Act of 1998 shall be fined under this 

13 title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.’’. 

14 (b) CLARIFICATION OF ACTS AND OMISSION CONSTI15 TUTING MISCONDUCT.—For purposes of section 1203 of 

16 the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform 

17 Act of 1998 and section 250 of title 18, United States 

18 Code (as added by this section) the protections and guar19 antees afforded under the First Amendment of the Con20 stitution of the United States to political speech and polit21 ical expression shall not fail to be treated as rights under 

22 the Constitution of the United States referred to in section 

23 1203(b) of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring 

24 and Reform Act of 1998. 

25 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

26 for chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1950 IH

1 by adding after the item relating to section 249 the fol2 lowing: 

‘‘250. Discriminatory misconduct against taxpayers by Federal officers and employees.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 1400.402 Notification. ( a ) Any legal entity, whether foreign or domestic, that executes a program contract or agreement under which a payment, loan, or benefit may be available must provide written notification to the county committee in the county where the legal entity conducts its farming operation if: ( 1 ) Any person, group of persons, legal entity, or group of legal entities holds more than a 10 percent interest in the legal entity; and
( 2 ) The person, group of persons, legal entity, or group of legal entities, in accordance with § 1400.401, are ineligible to receive a payment, loan, or benefit.
( b ) Written notification must include the name and social security number or taxpayer identification number of the a person or legal entity, if known, and of all persons and legal entities that hold an interest in the legal entity.
( c ) The failure of the legal entity to provide this information will result in the ineligibility of the legal entity to receive any payment, loan, or benefit.
[73 FR 79273, Dec. 29, 2008, as amended at 85 FR 52040, Aug. 24, 2020]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1993 

To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from hiring new employees to 

enforce the Federal Government’s invasion into the health care lives 

of American citizens. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2013 

Mr. FORBES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from hiring new 

employees to enforce the Federal Government’s invasion 

into the health care lives of American citizens. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevent IRS Overreach 

5 Act of 2013’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1993 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IRS FROM HIRING NEW EMPLOY2 EES TO ENFORCE PATIENT PROTECTION AND 

3 AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND HEALTH CARE 

4 AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF 

5 2010. 

6 No position within the Internal Revenue Service may 

7 be filled, by transfer or any other appointment taking ef8 fect on or after the date of enactment of this Act, if the 

9 duties and responsibilities of such position include the en10 forcement of any provision of, or amendment made by, the 

11 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or the Health 

12 Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-17-00790-CR

Style: Frank Gill v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: February 21, 2018

Type of motion: Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant’s appointed counsel Danny K. Easterling

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: December 11, 2017

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due Date: February 9, 2018

Date Requested: April 9, 2018 (119 days from original due date)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: April 9, 2018.

 No further extensions of time will be granted.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

The Clerk of this Court’s February 20, 2018 notice warned counsel that because his 

brief had not been timely filed, if the Court does not receive a motion or brief within 10 

days of that notice, it would abate this case for a late-brief hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(b)(2). Because appellant’s counsel’s request was timely and states that he has 

been busy with several court appearances and other appeals, it is granted, but counsel 

is warned that no further extensions will be granted due to the total length requested.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(B), (C), 38.6(d). Accordingly, if appellant’s brief is not

filed by April 9, 2018, this Court may abate this case. See id. 38.8(b)(2).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

  Acting for the Court

Date: February 27, 2018
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 24, 2012

s0917

Order 

September 24, 2012

144648

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144648

COA: 305915

Tuscola CC: 07-010484-FH

DWAYNE ANTONY ROCCA, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).