August 2010

A. How to Use 

the Guide

D. TMP Template 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts

E. Sample TMP 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts 

C. TMP Template 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts

F. Sample TMP 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts 

B. TMP 

Tips and Tools

SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION 

MANAGEMENT PLANS AND 

TEMPLATES

U.S. Department of 

Transportation

Federal Highway Administration

Office of Operations

MPLE TRANSPORTATION 

MANAGEMENT PLAN I
Notice 

The Federal Highway Administration provides high-quality information to serve 

Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. 

Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, 

and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its 

programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement.

.
Technical Report Documentation Page 

1. Report No. 

FHWA-HOP-11-003

2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 

4. Title and Subtitle 

Sample Transportation Management Plans and Templates

5. Report Date 

August 2010

6. Performing Organization Code

7. Author(s)

Leverson Boodlal, P.E. – KLS Engineering

Tintu Abraham – KLS Engineering

8. Performing Organization Report 

No. 

9. Performing Organization Name and Address 

KLS Engineering, LLC

45155 Research Pl, Suite 200

Ashburn, VA 20147

10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 

11. Contract or Grant No. 

DTFH61-06-D-00005

12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

Office of Transportation Operations

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

www.fhwa.dot.gov/workzones

13. Type of Report and Period 

Covered 

14. Sponsoring Agency Code 

HOTO

15. Supplementary Notes 

FHWA Project Leader-Tracy Scriba

Valuable assistance in the development of the guide was provided by FHWA Resource Center- Illinois, 

FHWA Division Office-Missouri, and various State Department of Transportations including Arizona,

California, Maryland, Michigan, Rhode Island, Virginia, Oregon, and Wisconsin. We also acknowledge the 

District of Columbia and the Michigan Departments of Transportation for providing the information in

developing the sample TMPs.

16. Abstract 

This Guide consisting of samples, templates, and tips is designed to help transportation agencies with the 

development and implementation of their own Transportation Management Plans (TMPs). Understanding 

the work zone impacts is critical to developing effective work zone TMPs that provide for adequate safety and 

mobility for the traveling public and construction workers. The primary intended audience for this guide is 

transportation agency staff, including technical staff, (planners, designers, traffic engineers, highway/safety 

engineers, etc); management and executive-level staff responsible for setting policy and program direction; 

field staff responsible for building projects and managing work zones; and staff responsible for assessing 

performance in these areas. The TMP samples and templates presented in the guide represent two projects 

with different levels of impacts.

 Template 1 and Sample 1— Projects with minor-to-moderate level of impacts.

 Template 2 and Sample 2— Projects with moderate-to-major level of impacts.

17. Key Words

Work zone, safety, mobility, transportation 

management plan sample, transportation 

management plan template

18. Distribution Statement 

No restrictions. This document is available to the 

public.

19. Security Classif. (of this 

report) 

Unclassified 

20. Security Classif. (of this page) 

Unclassified 

21. No. of 

Pages 

254

22. Price 

Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized 

SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION 

MANAGEMENT PLANS AND TEMPLATES

August 2010

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Highway Administration

Office of Operations

List of Acronyms

ADA — Americans with Disability Act

ADOT — Arizona Department of Transportation

ADT — Average Daily Traffic

AFAD — Automatic Flagger Assistance Devices

CALTRANS — California Department of Transportation

CCTV — Closed Circuit Television

CO3 — Construction Congestion Cost Program

CPM — Capital Preventive Maintenance

CS — Control Section

DC HSEMA —

District of Columbia Homeland Security and Emergency Management 

Agency

DDOT — District Department of Transportation

DOH — Department of Health

DOT — Department of Transportation

EB — Eastbound

FEMS — Fire and Emergency Medical Services

HAR — Highway Advisory Radio

HMA — Hot-Mix Asphalt

ITS — Intelligent Transportation Systems

IWZ — Intelligent Work Zones

JN — Job Number

LCAP — Lane Closure Analysis Program

LOS — Level of Service

MTA — Mass Transit Authority

WMATA — Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

MDOT — Michigan Department of Transportation

MdSHA — Maryland State Highway Administration

Mn/DOT — Minnesota Department of Transportation

MoDOT — Missouri Department of Transportation

MOE — Measure of Effectiveness

MOT — Maintenance of Traffic

MPD — Metropolitan Police Department

NE — Northeast Quadrant

PCMS — Portable Changeable Message Signs

PD — Police Department

PHV — Peak Hourly Volume
List of Acronyms

PI&O — Public Information and Outreach Plan

PIP — Public Information Plan 

POB — Point of Beginning 

POE — Point of End

RIDOT — Rhode Island Department of Transportation

SMPT — Safety and Mobility Peer Team

TMC — Transportation Management Center

TMP — Transportation Management Plan

TO — Transportation Operations

TOP — Transportation Operations Plan

TSC — Transportation Service Center

TMS — Transportation Management System

TTC — Temporary Traffic Control

TTCP — Temporary Traffic Control Plan

V/C — Volume/Capacity

VPD — Vehicles Per Day

WB — Westbound
Table of Contents

How to Use the Guide A 

TMP Tips and Tools B 

TMP Template 1 Minor-to-Moderate Impacts C 

TMP Template 2 Moderate-to-Major Impacts D 

Sample TMP 1 Minor-to-Moderate Impacts 

with Appendices 

E 

Sample TMP 2 Moderate-to-Major Impacts 

with Appendices 

F 

 

A. HOW TO USE THE GUIDE

A. How to Use 

the Guide 

D. TMP Template 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts 

E. Sample TMP 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts 

 

F. Sample TMP 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts 

SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION 

MANAGEMENT PLANS (TMPs) 

AND TEMPLATES 

C. TMP Template 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts 

August 2010 

B. TMP 

Tips and Tools 

 

A-1

How to Use the Guide 

This document is intended to provide assistance to transportation agencies in developing 

transportation management plans (TMPs) for their road projects. A TMP lays out a set of 

strategies for managing the work zone impacts of a project and is required by the Work Zone 

Safety and Mobility Rule. Because work zone objectives, needs, and issues vary from project to 

project, the scope, content, and detail in a TMP will also vary from project to project. It is 

ultimately up to the agency to establish and implement TMPs that best serve the mobility and 

safety needs of the motoring public, construction workers, businesses, and the community. To 

assist transportation agencies in developing TMPs, this document provides example templates 

and samples for two different levels of impacts: 

 Template 1 and Sample 1— Projects with minor-to-moderate level of impacts. 

 Template 2 and Sample 2— Projects with moderate-to-major level of impacts. 

Depending on the level of expected impacts of an upcoming project, transportation agencies can 

use either Template 1 or Template 2 as a guide to develop their own TMPs. For each template, a 

sample TMP is included that was developed based on information provided by the State/agency 

where the project is located. These templates and samples are intended only as resources to 

transportation agencies and are not the only possible/acceptable format for a TMP.

1. Project Description 

2. TMP Team—Roles and 

Responsibilities 

3. Preliminary Work Zone Impact 

Assessment 

4. Work Zone Impact Management 

Strategies 

5. Notes 

6. TMP Implementation/ Monitoring 

7. TMP Review/Approvals 

8. Appendices 

Refer to Sample TMP 1*—Rehabilitation of 

Benning Road, Washington, D.C. 

Template 1 

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts 

1. Project Description 

2. TMP Team—Roles and Responsibilities 

3. Preliminary Work Zone Impact 

Assessment 

4. Existing Conditions 

5. Operational Analysis 

 5.1. Safety Analysis 

 5.2. Traffic Analysis 

6. Work Zone Impact Management 

Strategies 

7. Notes 

8. TMP Implementation/ Monitoring 

9. TMP Review/Approvals 

10. Appendices 

Refer to Sample TMP 2*—Reconstruction of 

I-94 bridges over Riverside Drive, Battle 

Creek, Michigan. 

Template 2 

Moderate-to-Major Impacts 

Agency Process to Determine Impact Level 

*Footnotes in the samples are intended to provide additional information for users. Real 

TMPs may not include such information.

B. TMP DEVELOPMENT 

AND IMPLEMENTATION 

TIPS AND TOOLS

A. How to Use 

the Guide

D. TMP Template 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts

E. Sample TMP 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts

F. Sample TMP 2

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts

SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION 

MANAGEMENT PLANS (TMPs)

AND TEMPLATES

C. TMP Template 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts

B. TMP 

Tips and Tools

August 2010

B-1

TMP Development Tips and Considerations 

 Early TMP Development—Conducting TMP analyses early in a project’s development 

helps ensure that TMP development and implementation costs are included in the project 

budget and that agencies consider work zone impacts in evaluation and selection of design 

alternatives. 

 Early Project Coordination—Coordinating among multiple projects in the same corridor 

or region is important to effectively manage overall work zone impacts and maximize use 

of resources. When coordination across projects is not done early in the process, it can lead 

to conflicts in roles and responsibilities, TTC plans, and other strategies in the future and 

can result in additional cost. Some agencies have found to helpful to create a regional TMP 

or corridor TMP to help coordinate individual project TMPs and address overarching issues 

in an integrated way when there are several projects in an area at the same time. Such 

coordination may also bring to light opportunities for sharing resources, such as dynamic 

message signs or motorist assist patrols, potentially leading to cost efficiencies. 

 Stakeholder Coordination—Stakeholder coordination is invaluable for successful 

completion of any project as it helps keep the stakeholders informed, provides an avenue to 

seek their input on and knowledge of local/regional issues, and improves interagency 

coordination and response to work zone issues. Good, early coordination with stakeholders 

can help identify additional solutions to work zone concerns and eliminate later surprises. 

 TMP Costs—Estimating the work zone management strategy implementation cost of the 

TMP and including these costs within the overall project budget is crucial, as it may be 

difficult to obtain additional funding at a later time. 

 Multi-Jurisdictional Communication and Buy-In—Early communication and 

coordination with surrounding DOTs and other relevant agencies will help in planning 

mitigation strategies and provide the basis for better support and solutions. This is 

particularly important for projects where impacts are expected to extend beyond State lines. 

 Viability of Alternate Routes, Including Pedestrian Detours—Consider and include 

proposed alternate/detour routes in the traffic analysis to assess how viable the proposed 

routes are in addressing the safety and mobility issues that may arise for all road users. Also 

assess any proposed pedestrian/bicycle detour routes to determine any safety or 

accessibility issues. 

 Contract Documents—Specify in contract documents which requirements supersede 

others to avoid any conflicts between TMP guidelines and any other contract documents. It 

is also desirable to include any specific TMP requirements (including the potential need for 

TMP modifications as the project develops) in contract documents for projects when a 

contractor will develop the TMP (e.g., design-build project). 

 Summary Tables—When possible, use summary tables in the TMP document to help 

increase the clarity of information. Some transportation agencies include a summary table 

in the TMP to provide a quick overview of the operational characteristics for the existing 

and proposed conditions. 
B-2

 TMP Updates—Revise the TMP and its appendices/attachments periodically as major 

changes are made to the proposed improvements and schedules. Specify the requirement of 

TMP updates (if needed frequency of updates can also be included) in contract documents 

for a contractor-developed TMP.

 TMP Uniqueness and Flexibility in Development—Because each project is unique, these 

TMP Samples and Templates are not intended to be restrictive; agencies should use them as 

resources to assist in the TMP development process.

 TMP Training—It is important to provide TMP Training to all involved in the 

development and implementation of TMPs. Training will help the staff to understand work 

zone impacts issues, and the process involved and options available in developing, 

implementing, and monitoring TMPs and help improve the consistency of TMPs within an 

agency.

TMP Development and Implementation Tools 

FHWA has developed a guide, Developing and Implementing Transportation Management Plans 

for Work Zones, to assist practitioners with TMPs. The guide discusses TMP development 

processes and considerations, and include a work zone management strategies matrix. This 

guide, and more information on the below tools, are available on the FHWA Work Zone website 

at http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/wz/resources/final_rule/tmp_examples/tmp_dev_resources.htm. 

Many States have developed tools to assist their work zone practitioners through the TMP 

development process. A sampling of these tools include: 

 Red Flag Summary—The Maryland State Highway Administration (MdSHA) has 

developed a red flag summary to assist its agency personnel in making a preliminary 

determination on some of the major issues that could arise during project development. 

The checklist flags any major construction issues during the early planning stage to avoid 

costly and complex conflicts or changes in the future. 

 TMP Data Sheets—The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) prepares TMP 

data sheets for all projects during the conceptual planning and design stages of a project to 

gather and summarize TMP-related information as the project develops. The data sheets 

include preliminary TMP strategies and costs, a work description, the work areas, and 

available information about traffic patterns. 

 TMP Templates— Rhode Island DOT (RIDOT) has developed four templates depending 

on the impact level of projects, with levels 1 and 2 designated as significant. The templates 

help to ensure that key steps are completed during TMP development and that TMPs do not 

overlook key items. The templates also provide consistency, which can aid in TMP review, 

approval, and evaluation. 

― RIDOT TMP Templates also includes a Post-Construction Work Zone Performance 

Assessment to be completed by the RIDOT TMP Implementation Manager at the 

completion of the work. This assessment helps document lessons learned and 

successes/failures of the TMP itself and its requirements, and provides 

recommendations on how to improve the TMP process and/or modify guidelines. 

 Work Zone Impact Assessment Decision Tree— The Minnesota Department of 

Transportation (Mn/DOT) has developed a work zone impact assessment decision tree and 
B-3

an impacts consideration worksheet to help identify the potential project work zone 

mobility impacts and provide guidelines for developing strategies to mitigate the impacts. 

 Intelligent Work Zone (IWZ) Toolbox— Mn/DOT developed an IWZ Toolbox that 

contains preliminary illustrations of IWZ Systems that are typically deployed and provides 

guidelines for selecting an appropriate IWZ System for existing work zone traffic issues 

and to mitigate anticipated issues on scheduled projects. The IWZ systems illustrated in the 

toolbox can be combined, modified, enhanced or simplified as necessary to suit the project 

needs. 

 TMP Workbook— The Tennessee Department of Transportation developed a TMP 

Workbook to aid DOT staff in developing TMPs. The Workbook serves as a decisionmaking platform for the TMP and also helps document TMP development. The first part of 

the Workbook (Project Significance Determination) is filled in by the planning staff, and 

then passed to designers to complete the sections on TMP strategies during project design. 

 TMP Strategy Database— The Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) 

developed a TMP Strategy Database program that returns possible appropriate work zone 

management strategies based on user inputs or various project characteristics. The program 

helps planners and designers select work zone management strategies and develop TMPs in 

a more systematic way, beginning at work zone planning, with re-evaluation occurring in 

the design stage. Construction personnel can use the program to find a solution should 

concerns arise while the work zone is in operation. 

 Work Zone Design Checklist— MdSHA developed a work zone design checklist, which 

provides a list of potential work zone impacts, design options, and management strategies. 

The Checklist helps designers identify work zone impacts that need to be assessed, and 

helps ensure that appropriate work zone options have been considered and strategies have 

been chosen before going forward. 

 Transportation Systems Management Meetings (TSMs) - The Arizona Department of 

Transportation (ADOT) Communications and Community Partnerships Division is 

involved throughout the design, construction, and maintenance process of a project to 

ensure that all stakeholders are involved. During construction, ADOT conducts frequent 

TSM meetings with all stakeholders, including contractors and political subdivisions. 

 TMP Training— The Wisconsin Department of Transportation developed and 

implemented a TMP training course that explains specific components of a TMP within the 

context of Wisconsin practice, requirements, and project development. 

August 2010

C. MINOR-TO-MODERATE 

IMPACTS PROJECT 

TEMPLATE 

A. How to Use 

the Guide 

D. TMP Template 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts 

E. Sample TMP 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts 

C. TMP Template 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts 

F. Sample TMP 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts 

TRANSPORTATION 

MANAGEMENT PLAN (TMP) 

TEMPLATE 1 

August 2010 

B. TMP 

Tips and Tools 

C-ii 

Table of Contents 

1.0 Project Description................................................................................................................ C-1 

2.0 TMP Team—Roles and Responsibilities.............................................................................. C-1 

3.0 Preliminary Work Zone Impact Assessment ........................................................................ C-2 

4.0 Work Zone Impact Management Strategies ......................................................................... C-4 

5.0 Notes ..................................................................................................................................... C-9 

6.0 TMP Implementation/Monitoring......................................................................................... C-9 

7.0 TMP Review/Approvals ....................................................................................................... C-9 

8.0 Appendices............................................................................................................................ C-9 

Transportation Management Plan Template 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

C-1 

1.0 Project Description 

This section provides an overview of the project, which generally includes: 

 Work zone limits (if possible, include a map showing the limits of the work) 

 Project background information 

 Overview of roadways directly affected by project work zones 

 Specific traffic restrictions expected on major roadways during the work 

(e.g., shoulder closures, lane closures, lane shifts) 

 Regional projects that may impact each other 

 Project Schedule. 

2.0 TMP Team—Roles and Responsibilities 

This section includes contact information and roles and responsibilities of major personnel 

involved in the project such as: 

 TMP Development Managers—Agency/Contractor personnel who have primary 

responsibility for developing the TMP. 

 TMP Implementation/Monitoring Managers—Agency/Contractor personnel who have 

primary responsibility for implementing and monitoring the TMP. 

 TMP Implementation Task Leaders—Responsible for managing, completing, overseeing, 

or assisting in specific transportation management tasks during the work. 

 Emergency Contacts—Public and semi-public agencies, such as hospitals, schools, health 

clinics, etc., who must be kept informed about the work zone activities, especially in case of 

a road closure. 

The following tables can be used to list the contact information and roles and responsibilities for 

major personnel involved in the project. Tables can be modified depending on agency needs. 

TMP Development Managers 

Department Of Transportation (DOT) Consultant 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Roles and Responsibilities: 

TMP Implementation/Monitoring Managers 

DOT Consultant 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Roles and Responsibilities: 
Transportation Management Plan Template 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

C-2 

TMP Implementation Task Leaders 

DOT Consultant 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Roles and Responsibilities: 

Emergency Service Contacts 

Fire and Emergency Medical Services (FEMS) Police Department (PD) 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Roles and Responsibilities: 

3.0 Preliminary Work Zone Impact Assessment 

As challenges vary greatly from one project to another, a preliminary assessment of work zone 

impacts developed in the early planning stages of the project will help identify issues or uncover 

problem areas that should be considered during project development. Agency guidelines apply 

on determining the impact levels and how extensive the preliminary assessment should be. Some 

agencies use decision-support tools, while others have developed checklists/flowcharts to assist 

in the decision-making process. 

Some of the potential questions that could help in the preliminary assessment of work zone 

impacts include: 

Does the project includes a long-term closure and/or extended weekend closure? 

If Yes, what is/are the applicable type of facility(ies)? 

 Freeway 

 Principal Arterial 

 Minor Arterial 

 Collector 

 Local 

Can traffic be detoured? 

 Is the local alternate detour route in good condition? 

 Will the detour route have a detrimental impact on emergency vehicles, school buses, or 

other sensitive traffic? 

 Are there load limit restrictions on the detour? 

 Are there bridge/culvert height or width restrictions on the detour? 

Is the existing shoulder sufficient to support traffic during construction? 
Transportation Management Plan Template 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

C-3 

Is additional width required on culverts or bridges to maintain traffic? 

Is there a pedestrian/bicycle facility that must be maintained? 

Would a temporary structure(s) be required? 

Would a median crossover be needed? 

Would there be a need to maintain railroad traffic? 

Could maintenance of traffic have an impact on existing or proposed utilities? 

Does it appear that maintenance of traffic will require additional right-of-way? 

Can the contractor restrict the roadway during the time periods listed? 

 a.m. peak hours, one direction 

 p.m. peak hours, one direction 

 a.m. peak hours, both directions 

 p.m. peak hours, both directions 

 Overnight 

 Local celebrations 

 Holidays or weekends 

 Sporting events/other special events 

Will project timing (for example, start or end date) be affected by special events: 

 School closings or openings? 

 Holidays? 

 Sporting events? 

Are there any projects to be considered along the corridor or in the region? 

 Roadwork in the immediate area that may affect traffic or the contractor’s operations? 

 Roadwork on other roads that may affect the use of alternate routes? 

Are there other maintenance of traffic issues? If so, specify. 

Some projects (e.g., on low volume rural roads) may need only a simple screening tool such as a 

checklist, while others (e.g., in congested urban areas) may need quantitative analysis (level of 

service analysis, signal timing, etc) to determine the impact levels. Quantitative analysis may 

indicate the need for some additional analysis and/or strategies to assess and manage the impacts, 

or it may indicate that impacts are relatively low and few strategies are required beyond the 

temporary traffic control (TTC) plan. 

NOTE: If the project is expected to create moderate-to-major impacts, use Template 2. For 

lower impacts projects, continue with this template. 
Transportation Management Plan Template 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

C-4 

4.0 Work Zone Impact Management Strategies 

This section provides an overview of various strategies employed to improve the safety and 

mobility of work zones and reduce the work zone impacts on communities and businesses. The 

strategies are grouped according to the following categories: 

1. Temporary Traffic Control (TTC) 

2. Transportation Operations (TO) 

3. Public Information and Outreach (PI&O). 

Additional Considerations 

TMP Details—Many agencies have the details of proposed work zone strategies in TTC plans 

(e.g., PCMS message content) and strategies listed in the TMP document. In such cases, it will 

be useful to include the detailed plans (e.g., TTC Plan) as attachments to the TMP. 

TMP Costs—Agency guidelines apply regarding whether cost should be shown in the TMP 

document. If the TMP is to be a contract document, it typically does not show cost items. 

However, estimating the work zone management strategy implementation costs and including 

these within the overall project budget is crucial, as it may be difficult to obtain additional 

funding at a later time. This potentially avoids under-allocation of funds. Where feasible, it is 

helpful to itemize the cost estimates for the various management strategies and document them in 

the TMP, and specify cost responsibilities, opportunities for sharing or coordinating with other 

projects, and funding sources. TMP components can be funded as part of the construction 

contract and/or in separate agreements.

The sample tables below provide a summary of various work zone management strategies. They 

can be modified by agencies to suit their needs. 

Temporary Traffic Control √ Cost 

Control Strategies 

1. Construction phasing/staging 

2. Full roadway closures

3. Lane shifts or closures

4. One-lane, two-way controlled operation 

5. Two-way, one-lane traffic/reversible lanes 

6. Ramp closures/relocation

7. Freeway-to-freeway interchange closures

8. Night work

9. Weekend work

10. Work hour restrictions for peak travel

11. Pedestrian/bicycle access improvements

12. Business access improvements
Transportation Management Plan Template 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

C-5 

Temporary Traffic Control √ Cost 

13. Off-site detours/use of alternate routes

Traffic Control Devices 

14. Temporary signs 

15. Arrow boards 

16. Channelizing devices 

17. Temporary pavement markings 

18. Flaggers and uniformed traffic control officers 

19. Temporary traffic signals 

20. Lighting devices 

Project Coordination Strategies 

21. Other area projects 

22. Utilities 

23. Right-of-Way 

24. Other transportation infrastructure 

Innovative Contracting Strategies 

25. Design-Build 

26. A+B Bidding 

27. Incentive/Disincentive clauses 

28. Lane rental 

29. Performance specifications 

Innovative or Accelerated Construction Techniques 

30. Prefabricated/precast elements 

31. Rapid cure materials 

Transportation Operations √ Cost 

Demand Management Strategies

1. Transit service improvements 

2. Transit incentives 

3. Shuttle services 

4. Parking supply management 

5. Variable work hours 

6. Telecommuting 

7. Ridesharing/carpooling incentives 

8. Park-and-Ride promotion 
Transportation Management Plan Template 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

C-6 

Transportation Operations √ Cost 

Corridor/Network Management Strategies 

9. Signal timing/coordination improvements 

10. Temporary traffic signals 

11. Street/intersection improvements 

12. Bus turnouts 

13. Turn restrictions 

14. Parking restrictions 

15. Truck/heavy vehicle restrictions 

16. Reversible lanes 

17. Dynamic lane closure system 

18. Ramp closures 

19. Railroad crossing controls 

20. Coordination with adjacent construction site(s) 

Work Zone ITS Strategies 

21. Late lane merge 

22. PCMS with speed display 

23. Travel time estimation system 

24. Advanced speed information system 

25. Advanced congestion warning system 

26. Conflict warning system (e.g., construction vehicles entering roadway) 

27. Travel time monitor system 

28. Freeway queue monitor system 

29. CCTV monitoring 

30. Real-time detour 

Work Zone Safety Management Strategies

31. Speed limit reduction/variable speed limits 

32. Temporary traffic signals 

33. Temporary traffic barrier 

34. Movable traffic barrier systems 

35. Crash cushions 

36. Temporary rumble strips 

37. Intrusion alarms 

38. Warning lights 

39. Automated flagger assistance devices (AFADs) 
Transportation Management Plan Template 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

C-7 

Transportation Operations √ Cost 

40. Project task force/committee 

41. Construction safety supervisors/inspectors 

42. Road safety audits 

43. TMP monitor/inspection team 

Incident Management and Enforcement Strategies 

44. ITS for traffic monitoring/management 

45. TMC 

46. Surveillance (e.g., CCTV) 

47. Helicopter for aerial surveillance 

48. Traffic Screens 

49. Call boxes 

50. Mile-post markers 

51. Tow/freeway service patrol 

52. Total station units 

53. Photogrammetry 

54. Media coordination 

55. Local detour routes 

56. Contract support for Incident Management 

57. Incident/Emergency management coordination 

58. Incident/Emergency response plan 

59. Dedicated (paid) police enforcement 

60. Cooperative police enforcement 

61. Automated enforcement 

62. Increased penalties for work zone violations 

63. Emergency pull-offs 

Public Information and Outreach √ Cost 

Public Awareness Strategies 

1. Branding 

2. Press kits 

3. Brochures and mailers 

4. Press releases/media alerts 

5. Mass media (earned and/or paid) 

6. Paid advertisements 

7. Project Information Center 
Transportation Management Plan Template 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

C-8 

Public Information and Outreach √ Cost 

8. Telephone hotline 

9. Planned lane closure website 

10. Project website 

11. Public meetings/hearings, workshops 

12. Community task forces 

13.Coordination with media/schools/business/emergency services 

14.Work zone education and safety campaigns 

15.Work zone safety highway signs 

16.Rideshare promotions 

17.Visual information 

Motorist Information Strategies 

18.Radio traffic news 

19.Changeable message signs 

20.Temporary motorist information signs 

21.Dynamic speed message sign 

22.Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) 

23.Extinguishable Signs 

24.Highway information network (web-based) 

25.Traveler information systems(wireless, handheld) 

26.Transportation Management Center (TMC) 

27.Live traffic camera(s) on a website 

28.Project information hotline 

29.Email alerts 
Transportation Management Plan Template 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

C-9 

5.0 Notes 

Any additional notes on selected strategies, the TMP in general, or any item requiring special 

attention for the project can be provided in this section. 

6.0 TMP Implementation/Monitoring 

Monitoring performance of the TMP during the construction phase is important in establishing 

whether the predicted impacts closely resemble the actual conditions in the field, and whether the 

TMP strategies are effective in managing the impacts. According to 23 CFR 630 Subpart J -

§630.1012(e), the State/Agency and the contractor shall each designate a trained person at the 

project level who has the primary responsibility and sufficient authority for implementing the 

TMP and other safety and mobility aspects of the project. 

7.0 TMP Review/Approvals 

TMPs, and changes to TMPs, must be approved by the DOT before they are implemented. A 

sample TMP Approval Template is given below which can be modified by agencies according to 

their practice/needs. 

Chief Engineer Project Engineer 

All approvals must be obtained prior to start of work 

Signature: 

Name: 

Date: 

Signature: 

Name: 

Date: 

Revision# Initials Date Revision# Initials Date 

1 1 

2 2 

8.0 Appendices 

A. Traffic Analysis Reports (if applicable) 

B. Temporary Traffic Control Plans 

C. Public Information and Outreach Plan (if applicable) 

D. Post Project Evaluation Report 

Agency requirements for TMP implementation and monitoring can be included here. The 

responsible personnel for TMP implementation and monitoring can be identified in Section 

2.0—Roles and Responsibilities. 

 

 

August 2010

D. TMP Template 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts 

F. Sample TMP 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts 

C. TMP Template 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts 

A. How to Use 

the Guide 

D. MODERATE-TO-MAJOR 

IMPACTS PROJECT 

TEMPLATE 

E. Sample TMP 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts 

August 2010 

B. TMP 

Tips and Tools 

TRANSPORTATION 

MANAGEMENT PLAN (TMP) 

TEMPLATE 2 

 

 

D-ii 

Table of Contents 

1.0 Project Description ............................................................................................................... D-1 

2.0 TMP Team—Roles and Responsibilities.............................................................................. D-1 

3.0 Preliminary Work Zone Impact Assessment ........................................................................ D-3 

4.0 Existing Conditions............................................................................................................... D-4 

5.0 Operational Analysis............................................................................................................. D-5 

5.1. Safety Analysis................................................................................................................. D-5 

5.2. Traffic Analysis ................................................................................................................ D-6 

6.0 Work Zone Impact Management Strategies ......................................................................... D-8 

7.0 Notes ................................................................................................................................... D-13 

8.0 TMP Implementation/Monitoring....................................................................................... D-13 

9.0 TMP Review/Approvals ..................................................................................................... D-14 

10.0 Appendices........................................................................................................................ D-15 

 

August 2010

Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-1 

1.0 Project Description 

This section provides an overview of the project, which generally includes: 

 Work zone limits (if possible, include a map showing the limits of the work). 

 Project background information. 

 Specific traffic restrictions expected on major roadways during the work (e.g., shoulder 

closures, lane closures, lane shifts). 

 Specific roadways that will be directly affected by the project work zones. 

 Regional projects that may impact each other. 

 Project schedule. 

2.0 TMP Team—Roles and Responsibilities 

Defining roles and responsibilities from the initial 

stages of a project helps to coordinate all the activities 

related to TMP development, implementation, and 

monitoring. This section includes contact information 

and roles and responsibilities for major personnel 

involved in the project, such as: 

 TMP Development Managers—

Agency/Contractor personnel with the primary 

responsibility for developing the TMP. 

 TMP Implementation Managers—

Agency/Contractor personnel primarily 

responsible for implementing the TMP. 

 TMP Implementation Task Leaders—Agency 

personnel/Contractor personnel who manage, 

complete, oversee, or assist in specific transportation management tasks (examples include 

TTC inspection/supervision, PI Officer, etc.) during the work. 

 Public Information Officer—Agency personnel who provide real-time public awareness of 

the work zone, including detection, prevention, and response to incidents. 

 Emergency Contacts—Public or semi-public agencies (e.g., hospitals, schools) that need to 

be kept informed about work zone activities, especially in case of a road closures. 

The following tables can be used to list contact information and roles and responsibilities of 

major personnel involved in the project. The tables can be modified to meet agency needs. 

Additional Considerations 

 Some TMPs may not have all the 

information at the early stages of 

the project. Information can be 

added as the project progresses. 

 When multiple sections of an 

agency or different agencies, 

consultants, or contractors are 

involved, this would be a good 

place to include their contact 

information to help with 

coordination across 

agencies/projects. 

TMP Development Managers 

Department of Transportation (DOT) Consultant 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Roles and Responsibilities: 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-2 

TMP Implementation Task Leaders 

DOT Consultant 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Roles and Responsibilities: 

Public Information Officer 

DOT Consultant 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Roles and Responsibilities: 

Emergency Service Contacts 

Fire and Emergency Medical Services (FEMS) Police Department (PD) 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Roles and Responsibilities: 

TMP Implementation/Monitoring Managers 

DOT Consultant 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Name/Title: 

Unit: 

Phone: 

Email: 

Roles and Responsibilities: 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-3 

3.0 Preliminary Work Zone Impact Assessment 

As challenges vary greatly from one project to another, a preliminary assessment of work zone 

impacts developed in the early planning stages of the project will help identify issues or uncover 

problem areas that should be considered during project development. Agency guidelines apply 

on determining the impact levels and how extensive the preliminary assessment should be. Some 

agencies use decision-support tools, while others have developed checklists/flowcharts to assist 

in the decision-making process. For projects where major impacts are readily apparent, agencies 

may choose to conduct a detailed analysis directly (skip to Section 4.0), rather than go through a 

preliminary assessment. 

Some of the potential questions that could help in a preliminary assessment of work zone 

impacts include: 

Does the project includes a long-term closure and/or extended weekend closure? 

If Yes, what is/are the applicable type of facility(ies)? 

 Freeway 

 Principal Arterial 

 Minor Arterial 

 Collector 

 Local 

Can traffic be detoured? 

 Is the local alternate detour route in good condition? 

 Will the detour route have a detrimental impact on emergency vehicles, school buses, or 

other sensitive traffic? 

 Are there load limit restrictions on the detour? 

 Are there bridge/culvert height or width restrictions on the detour? 

Is the existing shoulder sufficient to support traffic during construction? 

Is additional width required on culverts or bridges to maintain traffic? 

Is there a pedestrian/bicycle facility that must be maintained? 

Would a temporary structure(s) be required? 

Would a median crossover be needed? 

Would there be a need to maintain railroad traffic? 

Could maintenance of traffic have an impact on existing or proposed utilities? 

Does it appear that maintenance of traffic will require additional right-of-way? 

Can the contractor restrict the roadway during the time periods listed? 

 a.m. peak hours, one direction 

 p.m. peak hours, one direction 

 a.m. peak hours, both directions 

 p.m. peak hours, both directions 

 Overnight 

 Local celebrations 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-4 

 Holidays or weekends 

 Sporting events/other special events 

Will project timing (for example, start or end date) be affected by special events: 

 School closings or openings? 

 Holidays? 

 Sporting events? 

Are there any projects to be considered along the corridor or in the region? 

 Roadwork in the immediate area that may affect traffic or the contractor’s operations? 

 Roadwork on other roads that may affect the use of alternate routes? 

Are there other maintenance of traffic issues? If so, specify. 

Some projects (e.g., on low volume rural roads) may need only a simple screening tool such as a 

checklist, while others (e.g., in congested urban areas) may need quantitative analysis (level of 

service analysis, signal timing, etc) to determine the impact levels. Quantitative analysis may 

indicate the need for some additional analysis and/or strategies to assess and manage the impacts, 

or it may indicate that impacts are relatively low and few strategies are required beyond the 

temporary traffic control (TTC) plan. 

NOTE: If the project is expected to create moderate-to-major impacts, continue with this 

template. For lower impacts projects, use Template 1.

4.0 Existing Conditions 

This section provides an overview of the existing conditions within the study area. The existing 

conditions generally include: 

 Roadway characteristics (history, roadway classification, number of lanes, geometrics, 

urban/suburban/rural). 

 Historical traffic data (volumes, speed, capacity, volume/capacity, percent trucks, queue 

length, peak traffic hours). 

 Traffic operations (signal timing, traffic controls). 

 Crash data. 

 Pedestrian/bicycle facilities. 

 Transit facilities. 

 Truck routes. 

 Local community and business concerns/issues. 

― Comments/concerns regarding traffic operations, delays, access/egress, etc., that 

have been received from community, business representatives, and stakeholders 

during the planning and design stages of the project development. 

― Specific concerns on pedestrian, bicycle, transit facilities, etc. This will help in 

assessing the impacts and assist in developing appropriate strategies to alleviate the 

identified issues and concerns. 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-5 

The sample table below summarizes pertinent project information. Agencies can modify the 

table to meet their needs. 

5.0 Operational Analysis 

This section is intended to provide information on safety and mobility aspects within the project 

influence area, including traffic safety, data collection and modeling approach, traffic analysis, 

and other issues and concerns. This operational analysis will help identify potential work zone 

impacts and guide selection of TMP strategies. 

5.1. Safety Analysis 

A safety analysis will help identify the potential locations for monitoring and/or other strategy 

deployments during construction to help manage work zone safety. Ongoing monitoring of the 

potential locations for any increase in crashes is important while the TTC, TOP, and PI&O are 

implemented. 

The table, below can be used to summarize crash data (at least for the previous three years) by 

intersection or control section. The table can be modified depending on agency needs/standards. 

Crash data may include: 

 Number of crashes by location. 

 Percentage of crashes by type or contributory factors. 

 Crashes per million vehicles, etc. 

Roadways Affected By MOT Plans—Summary 

Roadway/Street Name Classification ADT Capacity Peak Hour 

Volume 

Existing 

LOS 

Proposed 

LOS 

Summary of Crashes 

Intersection Name/ Control Section Type of Crashes Total Injuries Fatalities Work Zone Pedestrian Bicycle Rear-End Right 

Angle 

Left-Turn 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-6 

5.2. Traffic Analysis 

5.2.1. Data Collection and Traffic Modeling 

Based on the type and complexity of the analysis to be 

conducted, data collection/gathering may include: 

 Traffic counts (vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, 

trucks). 

 Speed survey (counts, posted and 85th percentile 

speeds, etc). 

 Intersection control. 

 Land use. 

Measures of effectiveness (MOEs) are usually 

determined for the primary/critical roadway segments. 

The type of analysis greatly depends on agency 

policies and practices, and complexity of the project. 

MOEs can include: 

 Delays 

 Queue Lengths 

 LOS 

 Travel Time 

 V/C Ratio 

 Congestion/User cost 

The use of traffic analysis tools depends on the roadway classification (corridor/freeway/freeway 

surface street interchange) and level of complexity of the project. Specific tools available for use 

in modeling include the following: 

 SYNCHRO 

 HCS 

 Quick Zone 

 QUEWZ 

 CA4PRS 

 DYNASMART- P 

 Lane Closure Analysis Program 

(LCAP)/Charts 

 VISSIM 

 CORSIM 

 Quadro 

A single tool may be used in modeling, or for some projects a combination of tools may be 

helpful. 

5.2.2. Alternatives/Impact Assessment 

A work zone impact assessment is the process of understanding the safety and mobility impacts 

of a road construction, rehabilitation, or maintenance projects. The analysis compares and 

documents various work zone options and associated maintenance of traffic constraints, 

including staging/phasing options as well as temporary traffic control options, for each project 

and work zone design alternative. Performing an alternatives analysis during the preliminary 

stages of the project helps in selecting the best option going forward. 

Additional Considerations 

 Model adjacent roadways 

impacted by the construction in the 

overall analysis, as traffic can 

detour from a congested 

construction route. 

 The FHWA Traffic Analysis Tools 

program provides information on 

traffic analysis tools. 

(http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficanal

ysistools/index.htm)

Additional Considerations 

Many States have developed/modified various spreadsheet programs and other tools, such as 

web-based work zone safety analysis, lane closure analysis programs, lane closure requirement 

charts or maps, etc., to assist in work zone impact analysis. 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-7 

An alternative assessment may involve a high-level qualitative analysis or a detailed quantitative 

analysis using various models, as described in section 5.2.1. It involves a comparison between 

existing and future traffic operations for different alternatives. These comparisons should be 

evaluated in conjunction with agency thresholds to determine whether the impacts are acceptable 

or not. For unacceptable impacts, agencies should follow their safety and mobility policy 

guidelines for reducing the impacts. 

To assess the impacts, traffic analysis is usually conducted for 

existing conditions and proposed work zone alternatives, and 

the results compared. Traffic analysis helps to: 

 Provide a baseline to compare with future work zone 

alternatives. 

 Identify the extent of possible traffic backups, which can 

then be used to determine potential detour routes or where 

traffic may naturally reroute itself, or locations that may 

need additional monitoring. 

The sample table template below provides an easy comparison of MOEs for different 

alternatives. Agencies can modify the table to meet their needs. 

This section can also include a brief review of the impact assessment of the selected construction 

alternative in different areas such as: 

 Community Accessibility—Impact on access/egress of the community and businesses 

around the work zones (if any). 

 Pedestrians and Bicyclists—Safety and accessibility of pedestrians with respect to 

sidewalk/crosswalk closures, ADA compliance, feasibility, safety of pedestrian detours, 

temporary crosswalks, etc. 

 Public Transportation—Work zone impact on the existing bus routes and bus stops. If any 

alternate bus stops are provided, are the routes to, as well as the bus stops ADA compliant? 

 Commercial Vehicles—Measures considered to reduce/detour the commercial vehicles (in 

case of significant impact operating in and around the work zones). 

 Utilities—Major utility projects could impact the roadway traffic. It is important to identify 

the utility projects scheduled to take place during the construction period and consider them 

while developing the TMP. 

Additional Considerations 

If the MOT alternative 

analysis is prepared during 

the design process, and is 

referenced in the TMP, 

consider including it as an 

appendix for easy reference 

and access. 

Summary Of MOEs For Alternatives – Exiting with Construction Conditions

MOEs Existing Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 

 

Legend 

Indicates Selected Alternative 

Additional 

Considerations 

It is recommended to 

include a short 

narrative on the 

reason for the 

selected alternative. 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-8 

6.0 Work Zone Impact Management Strategies 

This section provides an overview of various strategies deployed to improve the safety and 

mobility of work zones and reduce the work zone impacts on the road users, community, and 

businesses. 

The strategies are grouped according to the following three categories. 

1. Temporary Traffic Control (TTC) 

2. Transportation Operations (TO) 

3. Public Information and Outreach (PI&O). 

In addition to traditional TTC strategies, TO and PI mitigation measures must be used for 

significant projects. Some examples of TO and PI strategies include: 

 Motorist assist patrols. 

 Enhanced sign and pavement markings. 

 Increased police enforcement. 

 Real-time traffic information and updates on project delays. 

Additional Considerations 

TMP Details—For traditional design-bid-build project, many agencies have details of the 

proposed work zone strategies in TTC plans (e.g., PCMS message content) and list of strategies 

in the TMP document. In such cases it is useful to include the TTC Plan as an attachment to the 

TMP. In case of design-build projects, work zone strategies based on preliminary TTC concept 

plans would be included in the TMP document. 

TMP Costs—Agency guidelines apply on whether cost should be listed in the TMP document. 

When the TMP is a contract document, the cost items are typically not listed. However, 

estimating the work zone management strategy implementation costs and including these within 

the overall project budget is crucial, as it may be difficult to obtain additional funding at a later 

time for needed strategies. This potentially avoids under-allocation of funds. Where feasible, it 

is helpful to itemize the cost estimates for the various management strategies and document 

them in the TMP, with cost responsibilities, opportunities for sharing or coordinating with other 

projects, and funding sources specified. TMP components can be funded as part of the 

construction contract and/or in separate agreements. 

Contingency/Incident Management Plans—Consider developing a contingency plan that 

addresses specific actions that will be taken to restore or minimize impacts on traffic when the 

congestion or delay exceeds original estimates due to unforeseen events. This includes workzone crashes, traffic volumes higher than predicted traffic demand, delayed pick-up of lane 

closures, etc. 

It is best to develop the Contingency/Incident Management plan as a collaborative effort with 

the emergency response and the public safety community. Development of such a plan is 

crucial in the early phases to properly integrate the concerns of the first responder personnel. It 

is recommended that agencies consider key components, such as the following six items, in 

developing the plan: 

(1) Incident Detection and Verification; (2) Incident Classification and Response; (3) Site 

Management; (4) Site Clearance; (5) Motorist Information; (6) Evaluation.
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-9 

The sample tables below provide a summary of various work zone management strategies. The 

tables can be modified by agencies to suit their needs. 

Temporary Traffic Control √ Cost 

Control Strategies 

1. Construction phasing/staging 

2. Full roadway closures

3. Lane shifts or closures

4. One-lane, two-way controlled operation 

5. Two-way, one-lane traffic/reversible lanes 

6. Ramp closures/relocation

7. Freeway-to-freeway interchange closures

8. Night work

9. Weekend work

10. Work hour restrictions for peak travel

11. Pedestrian/bicycle access improvements

12. Business access improvements

13. Off-site detours/use of alternate routes

Traffic Control Devices 

14. Temporary signs 

15. Arrow boards 

16. Channelizing devices 

17. Temporary pavement markings 

18. Flaggers and uniformed traffic control officers 

19. Temporary traffic signals 

20. Lighting devices 

Project Coordination Strategies 

21. Other area projects 

22. Utilities 

23. Right-of-Way 

24. Other transportation infrastructure 

Innovative Contracting Strategies 

25. Design-Build 

26. A+B Bidding 

27. Incentive/Disincentive clauses 

28. Lane rental 

29. Performance specifications 

Innovative or Accelerated Construction Techniques 

30. Prefabricated/precast elements 

31. Rapid cure materials 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-10 

Transportation Operations √ Cost 

Demand Management Strategies

1. Transit service improvements 

2. Transit incentives 

3. Shuttle services 

4. Parking supply management 

5. Variable work hours 

6. Telecommuting 

7. Ridesharing/carpooling incentives 

8. Park-and-Ride promotion 

Corridor/Network Management Strategies 

9. Signal timing/coordination improvements 

10. Temporary traffic signals 

11. Street/intersection improvements 

12. Bus turnouts 

13. Turn restrictions 

14. Parking restrictions 

15. Truck/heavy vehicle restrictions 

16. Reversible lanes 

17. Dynamic lane closure system 

18. Ramp closures 

19. Railroad crossing controls 

20. Coordination with adjacent construction site(s) 

Work Zone ITS Strategies 

21. Late lane merge 

22. PCMS with speed display 

23. Travel time estimation system 

24. Advanced speed information system 

25. Advanced congestion warning system 

26. Conflict warning system (e.g., construction vehicles entering roadway) 

27. Travel time monitor system 

28. Freeway queue monitor system 

29. CCTV monitoring 

30. Real-time detour 

Work Zone Safety Management Strategies

31. Speed limit reduction/variable speed limits 

32. Temporary traffic signals 

33. Temporary traffic barrier 

34. Movable traffic barrier systems 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-11 

Transportation Operations √ Cost 

35. Crash cushions 

36. Temporary rumble strips 

37. Intrusion alarms 

38. Warning lights 

39. Automated flagger assistance devices (AFADs) 

40. Project task force/committee 

41. Construction safety supervisors/inspectors 

42. Road safety audits 

43. TMP monitor/inspection team 

Incident Management and Enforcement Strategies 

44. ITS for traffic monitoring/management 

45. TMC 

46. Surveillance (e.g., CCTV) 

47. Helicopter for aerial surveillance 

48. Traffic Screens 

49. Call boxes 

50. Mile-post markers 

51. Tow/freeway service patrol 

52. Total station units 

53. Photogrammetry 

54. Media coordination 

55. Local detour routes 

56. Contract support for incident management 

57. Incident/Emergency management coordination 

58. Incident/Emergency response plan 

59. Dedicated (paid) police enforcement 

60. Cooperative police enforcement 

61. Automated enforcement 

62. Increased penalties for work zone violations 

63. Emergency pull-offs 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-12 

Public Information and Outreach √ Cost 

Public Awareness Strategies 

1. Branding 

2. Press kits 

3. Brochures and mailers 

4. Press releases/media alerts 

5. Mass media (earned and/or paid) 

6. Paid advertisements 

7. Project Information Center 

8. Telephone hotline 

9. Planned lane closure website 

10. Project website 

11. Public meetings/hearings, workshops 

12. Community task forces 

13. Coordination with media/schools/business/emergency services 

14. Work zone education and safety campaigns 

15. Work zone safety highway signs 

16. Rideshare promotions 

17. Visual information 

Motorist Information Strategies 

18. Radio traffic news 

19. Changeable message signs 

20. Temporary motorist information signs 

21. Dynamic speed message sign 

22. Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) 

23. Extinguishable Signs 

24. Highway information network (web-based) 

25. Traveler information systems(wireless, handheld) 

26. Transportation Management Center (TMC) 

27. Live traffic camera(s) on a website 

28. Project information hotline 

29. Email alerts 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-13 

7.0 Notes 

Any additional notes on selected strategies, the TMP in general, or any item requiring special 

attention for the project can be provided in this section. 

8.0 TMP Implementation/Monitoring 

The TMP needs to be implemented in the field, as specified, unless any changes have been 

approved by the agency. To help ensure appropriate implementation, 23 CFR 630 Subpart J 

§630.1012(e) requires that the State/Agency and the contractor each designate a trained person at 

the project level who has the primary responsibility and sufficient authority for implementing the 

TMP and other safety and mobility aspects of the project. 

Monitoring the performance of the TMP during the construction phase is important to establish 

whether the predicted impacts closely resemble the actual conditions in the field, and whether the 

TMP strategies are effective in managing the impacts. TMP monitoring is needed for both 

oversight and evaluation purposes, such as: 

 Monitoring and documenting TMP changes during construction. 

 Preparing an evaluation of the TMP, including lessons learned. 

 Refining work zone impact analysis processes and models based on outcomes. 

TMP monitoring includes details of any specific observational, logging, and/or recording 

activities conducted during the project for work zone performance measurement purposes.

Examples of possible performance measures for TMP monitoring include: 

 Volume 

 LOS 

 Queue length 

 Delay 

 Travel time 

 Number of crashes/incidents 

 Incident response and clearance times 

 Type and frequency of legitimate complaints 

received. 

It is helpful for the TMP Implementation/Monitoring Managers to meet with the Project 

Manager on a regular basis to discuss and assess the safety and mobility impacts of the project 

work zone to date. This helps to assess how well the TMP is managing the project impacts, and 

can help identify and address issues before they become problems. It also provides the 

opportunity to verify that all key stakeholders and project officials have been receiving timely 

notifications where required. 

Additional Considerations 

Agencies use different methods to 

monitor and assess performance, 

such as portable sensors or 

floating car methods to measure 

queues and travel times, and video 

cameras with detection 

capabilities for real time 

measurements. 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-14 

9.0 TMP Review/Approvals 

TMPs, and changes to TMPs, must be approved by the 

DOT before they are implemented. As part of this 

process, many agencies conduct a TMP review, either by 

a designated individual or a team. A TMP review is 

particularly important for higher impact projects, and 

will help with future revisions of the TMP and 

performance monitoring. The TMP approval is then 

based on the TMP review. 

It is ideal to have a specific person, such as the Chief 

Engineer and/or a designate, approve the final TMP 

design document before implementation. It is 

recommended that major updates also be approved by 

Chief Engineer or designate. 

A sample TMP Approval Template is given below which can be modified by agencies according 

to their practice/needs. 

Additional Considerations 

Peer Review – Some agencies have 

found it helpful to use a TMP peer 

review process for significant 

projects that involves a team not 

directly involved with the project 

(e.g., staff from DOT central office 

and other regions/districts). The 

TMP may go through peer review at 

various stages of the project, at 

which the TMP is assessed and 

comments are provided, including 

how to proceed. 

Additional Considerations 

Following are some State/agency practices relating to TMP review and approval: 

 Michigan—has a statewide Safety and Mobility Peer Review Team for projects exceeding 

thresholds set in the Michigan Work Zone Safety and Mobility Manual. 

 Oregon—each region has it own TMP reviews. 

 Montana—TMP approval is conducted as part of the PS&E checklist 

 California—has a signature line for the TMP Manager on the project “ready to list” form so 

that the TMP is signed off right before the project is put to bid. 

 Maryland—District/relevant central office managers and the Public information Officer 

sign off on the TMP. 

 Rhode Island—requires that the Chief Engineer, State Traffic Engineer, and Traffic 

Management Chief sign off on the TMP as part of the PS&E review and process. 

 Wisconsin—has signoffs on the TMP worksheet checklist in the regions. 

Chief Engineer Project Engineer 

All approvals must be obtained prior to the start of work 

Signature: 

Name: 

Date: 

Signature: 

Name: 

Date: 

Revision# Initials Date Revision# Initials Date 

1 

2 
Transportation Management Plan Template 2

Moderate- to-Major Impacts

 

 

D-15 

10.0 Appendices 

Appendices may include: 

 Traffic Counts 

 Traffic Analysis (Existing compared with future) 

 Temporary Traffic Control Plans 

 Public Information and Outreach Plan 

 TMP Review Notes 

 Project Monitoring Form or Post-Project Evaluation Form. 

The information/data used in this sample TMP is for demonstration purposes only. 

E. MINOR-TO-MODERATE 

IMPACTS PROJECT 

SAMPLE

A. How to Use 

the Guide 

D. TMP Template 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts 

E. Sample TMP 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts 

C. TMP Template 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts 

F. Sample TMP 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts 

SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION 

MANAGEMENT PLAN (TMP) 1 

August 2010 

B. TMP 

Tips and Tools 

E-ii 

Table of Contents 

1.0 Project Description.................................................................................................................E-1 

2.0 TMP Team—Roles and Responsibilities...............................................................................E-2 

3.0 Work Zone Impact Assessment .............................................................................................E-4

4.0 Work Zone Impact Management Strategies ..........................................................................E-5 

5.0 Notes ....................................................................................................................................E-10 

6.0 TMP Implementation/Monitoring........................................................................................E-10 

7.0 TMP Review/Approvals ......................................................................................................E-11 

8.0 Appendices...........................................................................................................................E-11 

E-iii 

Project Name: 

Rehabilitation of Benning Road, NE 

from Anacostia Avenue to 42nd Street 

Washington, D.C. 

Sample Transportation Management Plan 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

E-1 

The project mainly consists of reconstruction of Benning Road, NE from Anacostia Avenue 

to 42nd Street, NE, Washington, D.C. The study area (figure below) considered for analysis is 

bounded by: 

 Benning Road, NE on the north and northeast side 

 Independence Avenue/E. Capitol Street, NE on the south side 

 17th Street, NE on the west side. 

Benning Road is a principal arterial and, as such, the project is defined as a significant project 

according to District Department of Transportation (DDOT). Therefore, the TMP must 

comprise of: 

 Temporary Traffic Control (TTC) 

 Transportation Operation (TO) 

 Public Information and Outreach (PI&O). 

1.0 Project Description 

Expected Construction Schedule: 

Months 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Phase 1 

Phase 2 

Phase 3 

Phase 4 

Phase 5 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

E-2 

2.0 TMP Team—Roles and Responsibilities 

TMP Approval Contacts

District Department of 

Transportation 

Name: John Xxxxx1

Phone: 202-671-xxxx 

Email: johnx@dc.gov 

Roles and Responsibilities: Responsible for the review and approval of the TMP.

TMP Management

Program Manager Name: Thomas Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-671-xxxx 

Email: thomasx@dc.gov 

Project Manager 

and TMP Manager 

Name: David Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-741-xxxx 

Email: davidx@dc.gov 

TMP Manager/Traffic Name: Brian Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-671-xxxx 

Email: brianx@dc.gov 

TMP Manger/ Monitoring Name: Karen Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-671-xxxx 

Email: karenx@dc.gov 

TMP Manager/ Contractor Name: Susan Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-671-xxxx 

Email: susanx@dc.gov 

Roles and Responsibilities: • Perform quality control and assurance of work zone 

policies to promote consistency and ensure compliance 

with contract documents, policies, and guidelines. 

• Coordinate implementation of the TMP. 

• Provide input and/or review each project phase regarding 

timeframe for completion of construction; sequence of 

construction; innovative, accelerated, or unusual 

construction methods; and constructability. 

TMP Stakeholder Contacts 

Mass Transit Administration 

(MTA) 

Temporary Bus Stop 

Relocation 

Name: Isaac Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-673-xxxx 

Email: isaacx@dc.gov 

Service/Route Changes Name: William Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-741-xxxx 

Email: williamx@dc.gov 

Washington Metropolitan 

Area Transit Authority 

(WMATA) 

Temporary Bus Stop Name: Sunny Xxxxx 

 

1

 Team member information is omitted. The information shown is for demonstration purposes only. 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

E-3 

TMP Stakeholder Contacts 

Relocation Phone: 202-962-xxxx 

Email: sunnyx@dc.gov 

District Engineer Name: David Xxxxx 

Phone: 301-513-xxxx 

Email: davidx@md.gov 

Maryland State Highway 

Administration (MdSHA), 

District 3 

Assistant District Engineer–

Traffic 

Name: Brian Xxxxx 

Phone: 301-513-xxxx 

Email:brianx@md.gov 

Additional Stakeholders Name: Levon Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-741-xxxx 

Email: levon@xx.xxx 

Name: Michael Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-741-xxxx 

Email: michaelx@dc.gov 

Roles and Responsibilities: TMP stakeholders must be consulted/coordinated with during the 

project in order to keep them informed and to: 

• Seek their input on and knowledge of local/regional issues 

• Improve interagency coordination and response to work 

zone issues. 

TMP Implementation Task Leaders

Public Information & Outreach 

DDOT Press Officer Name: Paul Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-298-xxxx 

Email: paulx@dc.gov 

Communication Specialist 

(IPMA) 

Name: William Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-671-xxxx 

Email: williamx@dc.gov 

Roles and Responsibilities: Responsible for providing real-time public awareness of this work 

zone. 

Monitoring 

TMP Monitoring Name: Wendy Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-741-xxxx 

Email: wendyx@dc.gov 

Roles and Responsibilities: • Conduct periodic inspections including windshield surveys 

and site visits during construction to assess effectiveness of 

staging plans and TMP strategies. 

• Conduct periodic review and evaluation of both traffic 

operations and safety conditions during construction, in 

coordination with TMP management personnel. 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

E-4 

Emergency Service Contacts

Metropolitan Police 

Department (MPD) 

Name: Faye Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-741-xxxx 

Email: fayex@dc.gov 

Roles and 

Responsibilities

• Provide active and passive law enforcement, as necessary, to 

promote safety and mobility in the work zone. 

• Identify unsafe conditions. 

• Take appropriate measures to clear work zone incidents 

efficiently. 

Fire and Emergency 

Medical Services

(FEMS) 

Name: Smith Xxxxx 

Phone: 202-741-xxxx 

Email: smithx@dc.gov 

Roles and 

Responsibilities:

Be informed of ongoing construction activities and detours to 

improve coordination and response to emergency issues in, around, 

and through work zones. 

3.0 Work Zone Impact Assessment 

An analysis using Synchro was conducted to estimate the work zone impacts. This was 

warranted due to the location of the project in an urban corridor with moderate traffic. The 

impacts analysis indicates that this is a significant project, with limited impacts as shown below. 

A summary of operational analysis is provided in the Appendix A. 

A. Does the project include long-term 

closures/extended weekend closures? 

 Yes 

 No 

If Yes, 

Check all applicable types of facilities: 

 Freeway 

 Principal Arterial 

 Minor Arterial 

 Collector 

 Local 

B. Significant Rating: 

 Not significant 

 Significant with few impacts 

 Significant with moderate impacts 

 Significant with high impacts 

C. Does the project need operational analysis to assess impacts? 

 Yes 

 No 

If Yes, check all applicable MOEs 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

E-5 

1. Expected additional travel time: 

 Less than 15 minutes 

 Between 15–30 minutes 

 Greater than 30 minutes

2. Expected queue: 

 Less than 1,500 ft 

 Between 1,500–3,000 ft 

 Greater than 3,000 ft

D. Are additional analyses/strategies needed to assess impacts? 

 Yes 

 No 

E. TMP Components Included Location/Contact (at DOT) Appendix # (if included) 

 Traffic Operational Analysis 

(TOA) 

TMP Report A (Traffic Analysis 

Report) 

 TOA Alternative Assessment 

 Other Impact Assessment 

 Temporary Traffic Control TMP Report B (MOT Plans) 

 TO Strategies TMP Report 

 PI&O TMP Report 

 Incident Management Plan 

4.0 Work Zone Impact Management Strategies 

Work zone impact management strategies are intended to provide mobility and access in and/or 

around the construction area without compromising public safety. The strategies are grouped 

according to the following three categories: 

1. Temporary Traffic Control (TTC) 

2. Transportation Operations (TO) 

3. Public Information and Outreach (PI&O). 

Table 1 provides a summary of the work zone impact management strategies that will be used. 

Appendix B contains the TTC plan sheets. 

Table 1: Summary of Work Zone Impact Management Strategies2

 

2

 The strategies and sample cost shown are for demonstration purposes only. Cost items are typically not shown 

when the TMP is a contract document. 

Temporary Traffic Control √ Cost 

Control Strategies 

1. Construction phasing/staging √

2. Full roadway closures

3. Lane shifts or closures √

4. One-lane, two-way controlled operation 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

E-6 

Temporary Traffic Control √ Cost 

5. Two-way, one-lane traffic/Reversible lanes 

6. Ramp closures/relocation

7. Freeway-to-freeway interchange closures

8. Night work

9. Weekend work

10. Work hour restrictions for peak travel

11. Pedestrian/Bicycle access improvements √

12. Business access improvements

13. Off-site detours/use of alternate routes

Traffic Control Devices 

14. Temporary signs √ $10,000/each 

15. Arrow panels √

16. Channelizing devices √

17. Temporary pavement markings √

18. Flaggers and uniformed traffic control officers √

19. Temporary traffic signals √

20. Lighting devices 

Project Coordination Strategies

21. Other area projects 

22. Utilities 

23. Right-of-Way 

24. Other transportation infrastructure 

Innovative Contracting Strategies 

25. Design-Build 

26. A+B Bidding 

27. Incentive/Disincentive clauses 

28. Lane rental 

29. Performance specifications 

Innovative or Accelerated Construction Techniques 

30. Prefabricated/Precast elements 

31. Rapid cure materials 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

E-7 

Transportation Operations √ Cost 

Demand Management Strategies 

1. Transit service improvements 

2. Transit incentives 

3. Shuttle services 

4. Parking supply management 

5. Variable work hours 

6. Telecommuting 

7. Ridesharing/Carpooling incentives 

8. Park-and-Ride promotion 

 Corridor/Network Management Strategies 

9. Signal timing/coordination improvements 

10. Temporary traffic signals 

11. Street/Intersection improvements 

12. Bus turnouts 

13. Turn restrictions √

14. Parking restrictions √

15. Truck/heavy vehicle restrictions 

16. Reversible lanes 

17. Dynamic lane closure system 

18. Ramp closures 

19. Railroad crossing controls 

20. Coordination with adjacent construction site(s) 

Work Zone ITS Strategies 

21. Late lane merge 

22. PCMS with speed display √ $20,000/each 

23. Travel time estimation system 

24. Advanced speed information system 

25. Advanced congestion warning system 

26. Conflict warning system (e.g., construction vehicles entering 

roadway) 

27. Travel time monitor system 

28. Freeway queue monitor system 

29. CCTV monitoring 

30. Real-time detour 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

E-8 

Transportation Operations √ Cost 

Work Zone Safety Management Strategies

31. Speed limit reduction/variable speed limits 

32. Temporary traffic signals 

33. Temporary traffic barrier √

34. Movable traffic barrier systems 

35. Crash cushions 

36. Temporary rumble strips 

37. Intrusion alarms 

38. Warning lights 

39. Automated flagger assistance devices (AFADs) 

40. Project task force/committee 

41. Construction safety supervisors/inspectors 

42. Road safety audits 

43. TMP monitor/inspection team 

Incident Management and Enforcement Strategies 

44. ITS for traffic monitoring/management 

45. Traffic Cameras linked to TMC √ $5,000–7,000/each 

46. Surveillance (e.g., CCTV) 

47. Helicopter for aerial surveillance 

48. Traffic Screens 

49. Call boxes 

50. Milepost markers 

51. Tow/Freeway service patrol 

52. Total station units 

53. Photogrammetry 

54. Media coordination 

55. Local detour routes 

56. Contract support for Incident Management 

57. Incident/Emergency management coordination 

58. Incident/Emergency response plan 

59. Dedicated (paid) police enforcement √ 25,000/year 

60. Cooperative police enforcement 

61. Automated enforcement 

62. Increased penalties for work zone violations √

63. Emergency pull-offs 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

E-9 

Public Information and Outreach √ Cost 

Public Awareness Strategies 

1. Branding 

2. Press kits 

3. Brochures and mailers 

4. Press releases/media alerts √

5. Mass media (earned and/or paid) 

6. Paid advertisements 

7. Project Information Center 

8. Telephone hotline √ $20,000–25,000/initial 

setup 

9. Planned lane closure website 

10. Project website 

11. Public meetings/hearings, workshops 

12. Community task forces 

13. Coordination with media/schools/business/emergency services 

14. Work zone education and safety campaigns 

15. Work zone safety highway signs 

16. Rideshare promotions 

17. Visual information √

Motorist information strategies 

18. Radio traffic news 

19. Changeable message signs √

20. Temporary motorist information signs 

21. Dynamic speed message sign 

22. Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) 

23. Extinguishable Signs 

24. Highway information network (web-based) 

25. Traveler information systems(wireless, handheld) 

26. Transportation management Center (TMC) √

27. Live traffic camera(s) on a website 

28. Project information hotline 

29. Email alerts 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

E-10 

5.0 Notes 

6.0 TMP Implementation/Monitoring 

Both DDOT and the Contractor must designate a trained person at the project level to implement 

the TMP (see Section 2 for Roles and Responsibilities) and other safety and mobility aspects of 

the project. For the Contractor, this person will be the Traffic Safety Officer (TSO), as specified 

in the DDOT Standard Specifications for Highways and Structures, 2005 or later, Section 

616.02(B1). These persons are responsible for efficiently and appropriately implementing the 

TMP. 

Both DDOT and the Contractor-designated trained person are responsible for reviewing traffic 

operations throughout the project limits on a regular basis, including the condition of all traffic 

control devices. DDOT will monitor the TMP for both oversight and evaluation purposes. DDOT 

will (as practical): 

1. Monitor and document TMP changes during construction. 

2. Prepare an evaluation report of the TMP, including lessons learned. (Appendix C contains 

the DDOT Post Project Evaluation Report template).

1. Portable Changeable Message Signs (PCMS) on either end of the construction zone to alert 

drivers of any lane shifts/closures, reduced speed limits, and expected behaviors. 

Recommended locations are: 

 EB Benning Road, NE west of Anacostia Avenue, NE. 

 WB Benning Road, NE east of 42nd Street, NE. 

2. Paid Police Enforcement at intersections along Benning Road with Oklahoma Avenue, NE, 

Anacostia Avenue, NE, 34th Street, NE, Minnesota Avenue, NE, and E. Capitol Street, NE. 

3. Contractor should install traffic cameras linked to the TMC at following locations. 

 Benning Road, NE at Minnesota Avenue, NE 

 Benning Road, NE at 36th Street, NE 

The TMC can coordinate and manage traffic as necessary. The existing TMC for the District 

can be used and may be staffed by either contract staff and/or agency personnel as per DDOT 

regulations. 

4. Benning Road, NE is an evacuation route and in case of any incident resulting in full 

closure other agencies should be informed, including: 

 D.C. Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency (HSEMA). 

 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA). 

 D.C. Fire and Emergency Medical Services (FEMS). 

 Department of Health (DOH). 

 Metropolitan Police Department (MPD). 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 1

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts

E-11 

7.0 TMP Review/Approvals 

In accordance with the DDOT Work Zone Safety and Mobility Policy, the designated DDOT 

Chief Engineer/Deputy Chief Engineer approves the final TMP design document before 

implementation. 

Chief Engineer 

All approvals must be obtained prior to start of work 

Signature: 

Name: Dawn Xxxxxx3

Date: xx/xx/xxxx 

Revision# Initials Date Revision# Initials Date 

1 1 

2 2 

8.0 Appendices 

A. Operational Analysis Summary 

B. Temporary Traffic Control Plan4

C. Post Project Evaluation Report. 

 

3

Team member information is omitted. 

4

 Appendix B contains a sample plan sheet from the full TTC Plan for this TMP. To limit file size to enable 

downloading, the full TTC Plan has not been included. 

Sample Appendices 

Minor-to-Moderate Impacts (Sample TMP 1) 

A. Operational Analysis Summary 

B. Temporary Traffic Control Plans (Sample) 

C. Post Project Evaluation Report 

A. Operational Analysis Summary 
1

Operational Analysis 

Data Collection and Modeling Approach The study team collected a wide range of 

geometric, traffic flow, traffic control, and operational data elements. Annual Average Daily 

Traffic (AADT) values were obtained from DDOT 2007 Traffic Volumes Map. This data was 

projected by using 1 percent growth factor to obtain the future conditions, 2008 AADT. Turning 

movement counts were conducted at five locations (shown in Figure: 1) to understand the traffic 

flow characteristics. 

Benning Road/Minnesota Avenue, NE. 

Benning Road/E. Capitol Street, NE. 

Minnesota Avenue/E. Capitol Street/Ames Street, NE. 

17th Street SE /Independence Avenue, SE. 

21st Street NE/C Street, NE.

Existing Traffic Operations There are 33 signalized intersections (see below) within the 

study area. The Synchro file for the influence area was obtained from DDOT. 

17th Street/ Benning Road, NE.

17th Street/Gales Street, NE.

17th Street/D Street, NE. 

17th Street/ C Street, NE. 

17th Street/Constitution Avenue, NE. 

17th Street/E. Capitol Street, NE/SE. 

17th Street/ Independence Avenue 

SE.

18th Street/C Street, NE. 

19th Street/ Benning Road, NE.

19th Street/E Street, NE. 

19th Street/C Street, NE. 

19th Street/E Capitol Street, NE.

19th Street/Independence Avenue, 

SE.

E. Capitol Street/22nd Street/ RFK 

Stadium, NE. 

E. Capitol Street/22nd Street/ RFK 

Stadium, SE. 

21st Street/ Benning Road, NE.

21st Street/ C Street, NE. 

24th Street/ Benning Road, NE.

26th Street/Benning Road, NE.

Oklahoma Avenue/ Benning Road, 

NE.

Minnesota Avenue/Benning Road, 

NE.

Minnesota Avenue/Grant Road, NE.

Minnesota Avenue/Ames Street/E. 

Capitol Street, NE.

Minnesota Avenue/Ridge Road, NE.

Minnesota Avenue/B Street, SE.

E. Capitol Street/ Stoddert Place, SE. 

Minnesota Avenue/Dix Street, NE.

Benning Road/Anacostia Avenue, 

NE.

Benning Road/34th Street, NE.

Benning Road/42nd Street, NE.

Benning Road/44th Street, NE.

Benning Road/E. Capitol 

Street/Central Avenue, NE. 

E Capitol Street/Texas Avenue, SE.
2

Crash History Crash history of the influence area indicates a very high percentage of rearend and sideswipe crashes, followed by right-angle crashes. Table 2, below, provides a summary 

of crashes for the period 2004 to 2006. 

Table 1: Summary of Crashes for the Period 2004 to 2006 

CRASH COUNT PERCENTAGE CRASH COUNT PERCENTAGE 

CRASH TYPE Benning Road NE from Anacostia 

Avenue NE to E. Capitol Street, NE

Influence Area, 

Shown in Figure 1

Right Angle 58 11.46 157 9.78 

Left Turn, Hit Vehicle 47 9.29 124 7.73 

Right Turn, Hit Vehicle 9 1.78 32 1.99 

Rear End 174 34.39 449 27.98 

Sideswipe 131 25.89 410 25.55 

Head On 10 1.98 47 2.93 

Parked Vehicle 11 2.17 97 6.04 

Fixed Object 14 2.77 74 4.61 

Run-Off-Road 0 0.00 8 0.50 

Left Turn, Hit Pedestrian 3 0.59 8 0.50 

Right Turn, Hit Pedestrian 2 0.40 8 0.50 

Backing, Hit Pedestrian 2 0.40 5 0.31 

Straight, Hit Pedestrian 15 2.96 64 3.99 

Backing, Hit Parked Vehicle 3 0.59 16 1.00 

Backing, Hit Moving Vehicle 3 0.59 11 0.69 

Backing, Hit Stopped Vehicle 5 0.99 14 0.87 

Non-Collision Accident 4 0.79 5 0.31 

Other 15 2.96 76 4.74 

Based on the crash history, it is recommended that all intersections be monitored throughout 

construction for an increase in crashes resulting from work zone implementation. In particular, 

special attention should be paid to Benning Road where it intersects with: 

1. Oklahoma Avenue, NE. 

2. Anacostia Avenue, NE. 

3. 34th Street, NE. 

4. Minnesota Avenue, NE. 

5. 42nd Street, NE. 

6. E. Capitol Street, NE. 
3

Figure 4: Synchro Network of the Influence Area

Figure 1: Crash Map of the Influence Area
4

Work Zone Impact Assessment 

The following assessment includes a brief discussion about how the project is expected to affect 

the work zone vicinity. This provides an estimate of how traffic demand and traffic patterns are 

expected to change because of the construction. Also, it gives an idea of areas of potential 

concerns.

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

The traffic analysis detailed below helps to assess the impact of the construction phasing on 

motorists delay and queues.

The Study Team used the DDOT Synchro Model as a basis for developing the traffic model of 

the project influence area. Traffic analysis was performed for existing and proposed construction 

conditions. The construction is proposed to take place in five phases, each of which was 

analyzed independently. The analysis did not consider the sub-phases of any phase. Measures of 

effectiveness (MOEs) such as level of service (LOS), delays, and queue lengths were reported. 

Table 2 shows the MOEs for the projected construction traffic for each phase as compared 

against existing conditions. 

Results While the LOS decrease on some segments, the overall LOS remained acceptable, as 

Table 2 shows. The analysis also indicates significant delay at Benning Road and Minnesota 

Avenue for Phase 1, NE (see Table 2 for WB movement information). It is recommended that 

DDOT review/modify the signal timing as shown below and monitor the intersection throughout 

the project. 

As the projected impacts are below DDOT allowable thresholds(1) for arterials, the proposed 

TMP (MOT, TO, PI&O) may be implemented in line with the recommendation of this analysis. 

Figure 2 provides an estimate of travel time (Benning Road from 21st Street to E. Capitol Road) 

by work zone phasing considering unforeseen conditions.

1

According to DDOT Work Zone Safety and Mobility Policy, for arterials, unacceptable travel delays are those longer than 15 

minutes or a traffic queue extending more than 1500 ft on the mainline, beyond what are considered normal for the affected 

roadway segment.
5

Table 2: Traffic Analysis Summary (Comparison of Existing with Proposed Phasing 1-V) 

Existing Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 

Locations 

Approach 

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay (sec) 

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

EB 0.38 18.5 146 B 0.38 18.5 146 B 0.69 24.9 315 C 0.38 18.5 146 B 0.38 18.5 146 B 0.38 18.5 146 B 

WB 0.45 17.4 200 B 0.45 17.4 200 B 0.73 19.8 394 B 0.45 17.4 200 B 0.45 17.4 200 B 0.45 17.4 200 B

NB 0.31 17.0 132 B 0.31 17.0 132 B 0.31 17.0 132 B 0.31 17.0 132 B 0.31 17.0 132 B 0.31 17.0 132 B

SB 0.04 11.3 23 B 0.04 11.3 23 B 0.04 11.3 23 B 0.04 11.3 23 B 0.04 11.3 23 B 0.04 11.3 23 B

Benning Road 

and 21st Street 

Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS -B Intersection LOS - B 

EB 0.31 3.2 19 A 0.31 4.3 31 A 0.58 5.0 30 A 0.31 3.1 17 A 0.31 3.1 17 A 0.31 3.1 17 A

WB 0.38 12.7 136 B 0.38 12.7 136 B 0.74 19.8 340 B 0.38 12.7 136 B 0.38 12.7 136 B 0.38 12.7 136 B

NB 0.25 23.0 107 C 0.25 23.0 107 C 0.25 23.0 107 C 0.25 23.0 107 C 0.25 23.0 107 C 0.25 23.0 107 C

Benning Road 

and Oklahoma 

Avenue

Intersection LOS - A Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - A Intersection LOS - A Intersection LOS - A 

EB 0.17 12.0 84 B 0.18 12.3 102 B 0.57 20.0 395 B 0.26 13.9 146 B 0.18 11.6 97 B 0.18 11.6 97 B 

WB 0.19 12.2 94 B 0.25 12.9 126 B 0.66 22.5 426 C 0.50 13.5 186 B 0.25 12.2 117 B 0.20 11.6 89 B

NB 0.16 26.8 73 C 0.16 26.8 73 C 0.21 24.1 85 C 0.16 26.8 73 C 0.16 26.8 73 C 0.16 26.8 73 C 

SB 0.43 43.2 38 D 0.43 42.7 38 D 0.57 57.8 95 E 0.30 33.0 38 C 0.30 33.0 38 C 0.30 32.9 38 C

Benning Road 

and Anacostia 

Avenue

Intersection LOS - A Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - A 

EB 0.28 (L- .34) 14.7 68 (L-85) B (L-0.41) 0.36 (R- 0.20) 36.2 (L-144) 249 (R-98) D 0.57 (L- 0.36) 23.4 172 (L-98) C 0.40 (L-0.40) 25.7 170 (L-117) C 0.57 (L- 0.40) 25.0 267 (L-95) C 0.57 (L -0.40) 46.4 346 (L-151) D

WB 0.56 24.2 166 C 1.04 93.7 454* F 0.23 38.2 146 D 0.23 (R-21) 45.5 316* (R-34) D (L -0.10) 0.70 (R-0.25) 31.2 (L- 28) 185 (R-22) C (L-0.10) 0.70 (R-0.25) 31.2 (L- 28) 185 (R-22) C

NB 0.17 (L-0.26) 11.6 70 (L-68) B 0.17 (L-0.26) 11.6 70 (L-68) B 0.54 L-0.54 11.6 70 (L-68) B 0.17 (L-0.26) 11.6 70 (L-68) B (L -0.30) 0.28 (R-0.04) 12.7 (L-68) 142 (R- 15) B (L -0.26) 017 11.6 (L-68), 70 B

SB 0.40 (R-0.08) 21.3 161 (R-19) C 0.38 (L-0.10) 22.5 161 (L-40) C 0.38 (L-0.38) 22.5 161 (L-40) C 0.38 (L-0.10) 22.5 161 (L-40) C 0.48 (L-0.10) 21.6 191 (L-40) C 0.38 (L-0.10) 22.5 161 (L-40) C

Benning Road 

and

Minnesota

Avenue

Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - D Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS - C 

EB 0.19 5.5 46 A 0.36 4.8 84 A 0.36 10.8 163 B 0.36 10.7 163 B 0.20 5.3 49 A 0.20 4.0 45 A 

WB 0.27 1.9 18 A 0.50 7.3 275 A 0.50 7.5 256 A 0.50 7.3 271 A 0.28 2.3 21 A 0.28 2.3 21 A

NB 0.12 22.1 50 C 0.12 22.1 50 C 0.12 22.1 50 C 0.12 22.1 50 C 0.12 22.1 50 C 0.12 22.1 50 C 

SB 0.12 14.9 43 B 0.12 14.9 43 B 0.12 14.9 43 B 0.12 14.9 43 B 0.12 14.9 43 B 0.12 14.9 43 B

Benning Road 

and 42nd 

Street

Intersection LOS - A Intersection LOS - A Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - A Intersection LOS - A Intersection LOS - A 

EB 0.21 9.5 62 A 0.21 18.0 113 B 0.21 11.7 82 B 0.21 11.4 81 B 0.21 15.8 106 B 0.21 16.8 108 B 

WB 0.23 4.9 51 A 0.22 5.0 51 A 0.23 5.0 51 A 0.23 4.9 51 A 0.23 5.0 51 A 0.23 5.0 51 A

SB 0.12 15.1 40 B 0.12 15.1 40 B 0.12 15.1 40 B 0.12 15.1 40 B 0.12 15.1 40 B 0.12 15.1 40 B

Benning Road 

and 44th 

Street

Intersection LOS - A Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - A Intersection LOS - A Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - B 

WB 0.57 35.1 173 D 0.57 35.1 173 D 0.57 35.1 173 D 0.57 35.1 173 D 0.57 35.1 173 D 0.57 35.1 173 D 

NB 0.14 (L-0.49) 11.9 0 (L-74) B 0.14 (L-.45) 10.6 0 L-75 B 0.14 (L-0.49) 10.2 0 (L-97) B 0.14 (L-0.49) 11.9 0 (L-79) B 0.14 (L-0.49) 10.2 0 (L-97) B 0.14 (L-0.48) 9.5 0 (L-95) A

SB 0.32 23.9 58 C 0.28 24.7 52 C 0.32 31.8 72 C 0.32 32.2 73 C 0.32 22.2 53 C 0.32 20.3 52 C

Benning Road 

and E. Capitol 

Street (WB) 

Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS - C 

EB 0.34 (L-0.23) 1.2 0 (L-2) A 0.34 (L-0.23) 1.2 0 (L-2) A 0.34 (L-0.23) 1.2 0 (L-2) A 0.34 (L-0.23) 1.2 0 (L-2) A 0.34 (L-0.23) 1.6 1 (L-4) A 0.34 (L-0.23) 1.2 0 (L-2) A Benning Road and E. Capitol 

Street (EB) NB 0.67 42.5 195 D 0.64 41.5 194 D 0.55 39.2 165 D 0.64 41.6 194 D 0.55 39.2 165 D 0.55 39.2 165 D
6

Travel Time Comparison

Benning Road from 21st St to E. Capitol St Existing - 7.2 min Phase 1 - 10.0 min

Phase 2 - 9.4 minPhase 3 - 9.4 minPhase 4 - 9.5 minPhase 5 - 10.0 min

Existing - 7.4 minPhase 1 - 11.3 minPhase 2 - 9.7 minPhase 3 - 10.1 minPhase 4 - 10.0 minPhase 5 - 9.6 min

EB

WB

Existing Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 

Locations 

Approach 

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay (sec) 

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

V/C ratio 

Control 

delay

Queue 

Length 95th 

( ft) 

LOS

SB .09 (L-.14) 2.6 2 (L-4) A 0.09 (L-0.14) 2.5 0 (L-1) A 0.09 (L-0.14) 2.6 2 (L-4) A 0.09 (L-0.14) 2.6 2 (L-4) A 0.09 (L-0.14) 2.6 2 (L-4) A 0.09 (L-0.14) 142.3 2 (L-4) A

Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - B 

EB

(L0.22),

(R-0.14) 

(L-20.9),

(R-16.5) 

(L-39),

(R-57) 

(L-C),

(R-B) 

(L-0..22,

R-0.14)

(L-12.2,

R-8.3)

(L-20),

(R-20) 

(L-B),

(R-A) 

(L-0.22),

(R-0.14) 

(L-12.2,

(R-8.3) 

(L-20),

(R-20) 

(L-B),

(R-A) 

(L-0.22),

(R-0.14) 

(L-12.2),

(R-8.3) 

(L-20),

(R-20) 

(L-B),

(R-A) 

(L-0.22),

(R-0.14) 

(L-12.2),

(R-8.3) 

(L-20),

(R-20) 

(L-B),

(R-A) 

(L-0.22),

(R-0.14) 

(L-12.2),

(R-8.3) 

(L-20),

(R-20) 

(L-B),

(R-A) 

WB 0.45 18.1 182 B 0.45 18.1 182 B 0.45 18.1 182 B 0.45 18.1 182 A 0.45 18.1 182 B 0.45 18.1 182 B

NB 0.01 13.2 9 B 0.01 13.2 9 B 0.01 13.2 9 B 0.01 13.2 9 B 0.01 13.2 9 B 0.01 13.2 9 B

SB 0.24 11.3 84 B 0.24 11.3 84 B 0.24 11.3 84 B 0.24 11.3 84 B 0.24 11.3 84 B 0.24 11.3 84 B

21st Street 

and C Street 

Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS -B Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - C Intersection LOS - B Intersection LOS - B 

Existing -Travel time (LOS) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 

EB 430.7 seconds (B) 497.0 seconds (C) 467.6 seconds (C) 467.7 seconds (C) 475.7 seconds (C) 496.0 seconds (C) Benning Road from 21st 

Street to E. 

Capitol Street WB 446.6 seconds (C) 563.1 seconds (D) 485.6 seconds (C) 505.7 seconds (C) 498.6 seconds (C) 479.0 seconds (C) 

Existing -Travel time (LOS) Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 

Figure 2: Travel Time Comparison - Benning Road from 21st Street to E. Capitol Street
7

ANTICIPATED WORK ZONE IMPACTS

Public Transportation – The MOT Plans show bus stop locations affected by lane closures. 

These and other similarly affected locations must be monitored to minimize public 

inconvenience and ensure full accessibility. While all bus routes are maintained, they also must 

be monitored to ensure scheduled viability. 

Community Accessibility The Contractor shall advise residents affected by alley access 

resulting from temporary closures in writing to take alternative alley egress and ingress. 

Residents affected by driveway access resulting from temporary closure shall be advised in 

writing by the contractor to park their vehicles in nearby parking zones. Community meetings 

are suggested during various stages of the project

Non-motorized Assessment – Temporary crosswalks and all other affected crosswalks and 

sidewalks, as shown in the MOT plans, must be monitored throughout the construction for safety 

and full accessibility. All pedestrian temporary provisions must comply with ADA and other 

District requirements.

Utility Utility impacts were not included in this analysis. 
B. Temporary Traffic Control Plans 

Only sample TTC plan is included here for reference, to manage the file download size. 

Generally all the TTC plans are included in TMP. 
...\155-mot-subph-v_minnave_022.dgn 7/21/2009 10:18:49 AM
C. Post-Project Evaluation Report 
POST PROJECT EVALUATION

Describe Areas of the TMP that were Most Successfully Implemented & Why 

Describe Areas of the TMP that were Least Successfully Implemented & Why 

Summarize/Describe all Changes Necessary to Correct Oversight of the Original TMP 

Summarize the Effectiveness of Each Change Made to the TMP 

Summarize the Type and Frequency of Legitimate Complaints Received 

Describe/Summarize Road User Mobility Impacts Observed During Work 
Describe/Summarize Crashes and Incidents that Occurred During the Work 

Describe/Summarize Road Safety Impacts Observed During Work 

Suggested TMP Improvements or Changes for Future Similar Projects 

This completed assessment shall be forwarded to the Project manager and Team Leader following approval below.

DDOT PROJECT MANGER DDOT TEAM LEADER 

Signature: 

Name: 

Date: 

Signature: 

Name: 

Date: 

Information/data used in this sample TMP is for demonstration purposes only. 

F. MODERATE-TO-MAJOR 

IMPACTS PROJECT 

SAMPLE 

A. How to Use 

the Guide 

D. TMP Template 2 

 Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts 

E. Sample TMP 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts 

C. TMP Template 1 

Minor-to-Moderate 

Impacts 

F. Sample TMP 2 

Moderate-to-Major 

Impacts 

SAMPLE TRANSPORTATION 

MANAGEMENT PLAN (TMP) 2 

August 2010 

B. TMP 

Tips and Tools 

F-ii 

Table of Contents 

Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................F-1 

1.0 Project Description.................................................................................................................F-2 

2.0 TMP Team—Roles and Responsibilities...............................................................................F-3 

3.0 Existing Conditions................................................................................................................F-5 

4.0 Operational Analysis—Existing ............................................................................................F-5 

4.1. Safety Analysis..................................................................................................................F-5 

4.2. Traffic Analysis .................................................................................................................F-6 

5.0 Work Zone Impact Management Strategies ..........................................................................F-9 

5.1. Temporary Traffic Control Plan........................................................................................F-9 

5.2. Transportation Operations Plan.........................................................................................F-9

5.3. Public Information Plan...................................................................................................F-11 

6.0 TMP Implementation/Monitoring........................................................................................F-16 

7.0 TMP Review/Approvals ......................................................................................................F-16 

8.0 Appendices...........................................................................................................................F-16 

 

F-iii 

Project Name: 

Replacement of 1-94 Bridges 

over Riverside Drive 

Battle Creek, Michigan 

Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-1 

Executive Summary 

This sample was developed based on the Transportation Management Plan (TMP) created for the 

replacement of I-94 bridges over Riverside Drive in Battle Creek, Michigan. Replacement of the 

I-94 bridges is expected to create significant impacts in the vicinity of the project. This TMP 

shows the analysis of alternate traffic control schemes, the anticipated impacts of the 

construction, and the strategies that will be deployed to mitigate the impacts. 1

 

1

 The scope, content, and level of detail of a TMP should vary based on the size, location, complexity, and expected level and 

range of impacts of a project. Depending on these project characteristics, a TMP for a moderate-to-major impact project may 

have more or less analysis and detail than this sample. 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-2 

Vicinity Map

1.0 Project Description

The proposed project consists of two projects combined because of location. The first is the 

replacement of the two I-94 bridges over Riverside Drive. The second project is a capital 

preventive maintenance (CPM) cold mill and single course hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlay of I94 EB and WB from Helmer Road to 6 1⁄2 Mile Road, including ramps and rest area repairs. 

This is a significant project based on the criteria specified in the Michigan Work Zone Safety and 

Mobility Manual2. Thus, the TMP is comprised of all three components: 

1. Temporary Traffic Control Plan (TTCP) 

2. Transportation Operations Plan (TOP) 

3. Public Information Plan (PIP). 

 

2

 A non-traffic regulating operation project in Michigan is to be considered potentially significant if any of the following apply: 

 Any project that occupies a specific location for more than three days, with either intermittent or continuous lane closures; 

 Any project that, alone or in combination with other nearby or concurrent projects, is anticipated to cause sustained work 

zone impacts that are greater than what is considered tolerable. This will be based on an assessment of work zone safety 

and mobility impacts (volume/capacity, travel time, and level of service); 

 Any project defined as “potentially significant” or” critical” by region staff.

All potentially significant projects in Michigan are to be further evaluated for possible mobility impacts to the transportation 

system by comparison with the thresholds for the following critical evaluation criteria: 

 Volume to Capacity: Threshold—greater than 0.80. 

 Travel Time: Threshold—greater than 10 minutes. 

 Level of Service: Threshold—level of service drops 2 or more levels. For example, level of service A to C or C to E. 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-3 

Project Schedule: The proposed construction phasing consists of four stages, as illustrated by 

the schedule below: 

Proposed Schedule—I-94 Bridge Replacement 

ACTIVITY/WEEKS 2 4 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32

LETTING DATE 

STAGE 1 

STAGE 2 

STAGE 3 

STAGE 4 

BRIDGES OPEN 

TO TRAFFIC 

2.0 TMP Team—Roles and Responsibilities 

Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Project Engineer

Name: Daniel Xxxxx3

Unit: MDOT 

Phone: 517-242-XXXX 

Email: danielx@michigan.gov 

Roles and Responsibilities: Ensure TMP Compliance with the Work Zone Safety and Mobility 

Policy. Coordinate the PIP completion with the communication representative. 

Transportation Service Center (TSC) Staff 

Name (TSC Staff Lead): Leslie Xxxxx 

Unit: TSC 

Phone: 517-242-XXXX 

Email: lesliex@michigan.gov 

Roles and Responsibilities: Identify and propose mitigation activities to be included in the TMP 

in subsequent project development phases. Develop the project-level TMP, Temporary Traffic 

Control Plan (TTCP), Transportation Operations Plan (TOP), and Public Information Plan (PIP) 

for significant projects. Conduct capacity analysis using the CO3 (Construction, congestion, 

Cost) program or comparable project-level models. 

 

3

 Team member information is omitted. The information shown is for demonstration purposes only.
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-4 

TSC Delivery Engineer

Name: George Xxxxx 

Unit: TSC 

Phone: 517-242-XXXX 

Email: georgex@michigan.gov

Roles and Responsibilities: Ensure all aspects of TMP comply with the Work Zone Safety and 

Mobility Policy during the construction, which includes monitoring, analyzing, and documenting 

mobility criteria in the TMP and crash numbers once implemented.

Region/TSC Maintenance Supervisor/Coordinator

Name: Marshall Xxxxx 

Unit: TSC 

Phone: 517-242-XXXX 

Email: marshallx@michigan.gov 

Roles and Responsibilities: Ensure all State and contract maintenance activity is conducted in 

accordance with the Work Zone Safety and Mobility Policy. 

Public Information Officer 

MDOT Consultant 

Name: William Xxxxx 

Unit: MDOT 

Phone: 517-242-XXXX 

Email: williamx@michigan.gov 

Name: Mesfin Xxxxx 

Phone: 517-242-XXXX 

Email: mesfinx@eng.com 

Roles and Responsibilities: Provide real-time public awareness of the work zone. 

Emergency Service Contacts 

Name: Greer xxxxx 

Unit: TSC (Delivery Engineer) 

Phone: 517-242-XXXX 

Email: greerx@ michigan.gov 

Roles and Responsibilities: Respond in case of an emergency or unexpected event such as 

accidents, major traffic delays, etc. 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-5 

3.0 Existing Conditions 

I-94 is a multilane freeway with two lanes in each direction. Table 1 provides a summary of the 

roadway characteristics. Appendix A provides hourly count reports. 

Table 1: Summary of Roadways Affected by Construction 

Control Section, Roadway 13081, I-94 Bridges over 

Riverside Drive 

(Bridge Replacement) 

13081, I-94 by Riverside 

bridges 

(CPM Mill and Fill) 

13082, I-94 East of I194/M66 

(CPM Mill and Fill) 

Road Type 4 Lane Freeway 4 Lane Freeway 4 Lane freeway 

Existing Lane 

Configuration 

2 Lanes Eastbound & 

2 Lanes Westbound 

2 Lanes Eastbound & 

2 Lanes Westbound 

2 Lanes Eastbound & 

2 Lanes Westbound 

Proposed Lane 

Configuration 

2 1 (for nonrestricted 

hours only) 

1 (for nonrestricted 

hours only) 

ADT 55,800 55,800 50,400 

% Commercial 25% 25% 24% 

Expected % Diversion 5% 0% 0% 

Existing PHV (V/C) 0.90 0.90 0.75 

Existing PHV LOS D E C 

4.0 Operational Analysis—Existing 

This section analyzes the existing safety and traffic conditions within the project influence area. 

4.1. Safety Analysis 

A Crash Analysis & Safety Review was conducted for I-94 EB & WB (from Helmer Road to 61⁄2 

Mile Road), for the 3-year period (January 1, 2005—December 31, 2007), using the MDOT 

Transportation Management System (TMS) database. The segment analyzed was approximately 

0.25 miles before and after the point of beginning (POB) and point of end (POE). Table 2 below 

provides a summary of crashes. Fixed object, animal crashes, and rear-end crashes are the 

predominant crash types. Additional details on the analysis are provided in Appendix B. 

Table 2: Summary of Crashes (January 1, 2005—December 31, 2007, I-94 EB & WB)

Crash Type Crash Count Percentage 

Fixed Object 97 28.28 

Animal 56 16.33 

Rear-End Straight 52 15.16 

Sideswipe Same 38 11.08 

Miscellaneous One Vehicle 28 8.16 

Overturn 28 8.16 

Other Object 21 6.12 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-6 

4.2. Traffic Analysis 

4.2.1. Data Collection and Traffic Modeling Approach 

The CO3 model4 was used to model traffic delay, user cost, and construction cost for 

construction and maintenance operations. In addition, LOS charts were generated based on 

Highway Capacity Manual. 

The traffic data for analyses was obtained from hourly count reports provided by the MDOT 

Bureau of Transportation Planning. Appendix B provides the traffic counts and Appendix C 

shows the detailed reports. 

Output data from the CO3 software and LOS Charts were used to describe the operation of the 

control sections 13081 (I-94 bridges over Riverside Drive) and 13082 (I-94 East of I-194/M66). 

Measures of Effectiveness considered are: 

1. Vehicle delay (in minutes) 

2. V/C ratio 

3. Level of Service 

4. Maximum backup length (in miles). 

4.2.2. Alternatives/Impact Assessment 

The project team considered different alternatives on how to balance cost and mobility. CO3 

models were run based on these alternatives. The selection of alternatives was based on a 

combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis. 

 

4 The CO3 Model is a tool that engineers can use to estimate the magnitude and impacts of traffic congestion, 

including its cost impact on road users, that can be expected during a construction project. CO3 enables engineers to 

include construction congestion and its costs to users as an important variable in all project decisions, and helps in 

selecting among alternative methods of maintaining traffic during construction.

Crash Type Crash Count Percentage 

Angle Straight 9 2.62 

Rear-End Right Turn 4 1.17 

Head-On 3 0.87 

Sideswipe Opposite 3 0.87 

Rear-End Left Turn 1 0.29 

Angle Turn 1 0.29 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-7 

Alternatives Considered 

To possibly minimize the impact on user mobility, the following alternative traffic control 

schemes were evaluated for replacing the I-94 bridges over Riverside Drive project: 

1. Detour existing I-94 traffic to other routes: I-94 has an average daily traffic (ADT) of 

55,800 vehicles per day (VPD). This alternative was not feasible because detouring high 

volumes to existing routes would result in unacceptable delays and congestion on the 

surrounding road network. 

2. Construct a temporary bridge: This alternative was cost-prohibitive because of the steep 

grades and existing interchanges close to the bridge. 

3. One lane with alternating traffic on Riverside Drive during construction: This alternative 

would potentially increase project construction duration to two construction seasons. 

4. Part-width Construction: Construction would be performed as part-width to maintain two 

11-ft lanes with 1-ft shy distance in each direction (EB & WB) at all times for I-94. 

Riverside Drive would be closed and detoured. 

Selected Traffic Control Scheme for I-94 Bridge Replacement over Riverside Drive 

The selected alternative provides a project solution that not only meets and exceeds the final 

goals of the project, but one that could also be constructed with minimal impact to the 

surrounding roadway network and the roadways within the project limits. Part-width 

construction as detailed in alternative 4 above was selected. Traffic staging for this alternative 

includes: 

1. Stage 1: Shift two lanes of traffic in each direction (EB &WB) to the outside lane of the 

existing bridges. Remove inside portion of each bridge. 

2. Stage 2: Traffic remains shifted to the outside lanes of the existing bridges. Construct the 

new inside portion of bridge wide enough for two lanes of traffic in Stage 3. 

3. Stage 3: Shift two lanes of traffic to the inside lanes of the newly constructed bridges. 

Remove the outside portion of each existing bridge. 

4. Stage 4: Traffic remains shifted to inside of newly constructed bridge. Construct new 

outside portion of the bridge. 

Riverside Drive Detour 

The proposed detour route is Minges Road to Capital 

Avenue to Beckley Road. The travel time along the 

existing route is 1.98 minutes and the travel time of the 

detour route is 3.97 minutes, a difference of only 1.99 

minutes. The detour route will be reviewed to 

determine the need for new/additional signing and 

pavement markings, including detour guide signs, 

detour ramp gore signs, and two portable changeable 

message signs providing warning messages one week 

prior to and during the detour. The City of Battle Creek 

approved the detour route. During construction, access to all business and residential drives will 

be maintained. 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-8 

Selected Traffic Control Scheme for I-94 CPM Project from Helmer Road 

to M-66 

The CPM paving operations will be performed at night (Sunday through Thursday). During 

certain periods while paving operations are under way, roadway performance will decrease to 

LOS D and E due to time needed for constructability/production each night. The time restrictions 

for this project only permit an 11 hour work period for temporary traffic control setup, paving, 

stripping of temporary pavement markings, and removal of temporary traffic control. The 

contractor will pave one lane and a shoulder with a tapered overlapping centerline longitudinal 

joint. The following night the contractor will pave the adjacent lane. Table 3 provides a summary 

of Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) for existing and proposed construction conditions for the 

affected roadways. 

Table 3: Summary of MOEs for Existing Conditions and Proposed Construction Conditions 

Hourly 

Capacity 

Peak Hourly Volume 

(PHV) 

PHV V/C PHV LOS 

Existing 

Proposed 

Existing 

Proposed 

Existing 

Proposed 

Existing 

Proposed 

Control Section, Roadway 

WD WE WD WE 

13081, I-94 by Riverside 

Bridge 

 (Bridge Replacement) 

3,424 2,732 3,090 3,090 2,485 0.90 1.13 0.91 D E 

13081, I-94 by Riverside 

Bridge 

(CPM Mill and Fill) 

3,424 1,387 3,090 2,176 1,855 0.90 1.57 1.34 D E 

13082, I-94 East of I194/M66 

(CPM Mill and Fill) 

3,424 1,387 2,581 1,950 - 0.75 1.41 - C E 

Average Delay Peak Hour Delay Maximum Back Up Length 

Control Section, Roadway Proposed (minutes) Proposed (minutes) Proposed (miles) 

WD WE WD WE WD WE 

13081, I-94 by Riverside 

Bridge 

(Bridge Replacement) 

0.9 1.0 1.4 1.4 0.0 0.0 

13081, I-94 by Riverside 

Bridge (CPM Mill and Fill) 

1.4 3.9 18.4 40.5 2.2 5.1 

13082, I-94 East of I194/M66 

(CPM Mill and Fill) 

1.4 - 18.4 - 2.2 - 

 I-94 Bridge Replacement 

• Maintain two lanes in each direction with part-width construction. 

• WD—Weekday; WE—Weekend 

 I-94 CPM Mill and Fill 

• Maintain one lane in each direction during non-restricted hours (paving only Sun–Thu Nights) 

• WD—Weekday; WE—Weekend 

Appendix C presents detailed analysis reports. 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-9 

5.0 Work Zone Impact Management Strategies 

Work zone impact management strategies are intended to provide mobility and access in and 

around the construction area without compromising public safety. The strategies are grouped 

according to the following three categories: 

1. Maintenance of Traffic (MOT)/Temporary Traffic Control Plan (TTCP) 

2. Transportation Operations Plan (TOP) 

3. Public Information Plan (PIP). 

5.1. Temporary Traffic Control Plan 

The MOT concept described recommends the use of the following measures to maximize work 

zone safety and minimize impacts on user mobility: 

 Conduct an initial Plan Review meeting for the I-94 Bridges over Riverside Road project. 

 Provide adequate lateral and longitudinal buffers during active work periods to maximize 

user mobility and worker safety. 

 Provide positive separation between traffic and the work area using temporary concrete 

barrier, with attenuator. 

Notes: 

 Appendix D provides information on contracting clauses. 

 Appendix E provides the MOT plans and detour plan sheet. 

 Appendix F provides design plans/typical. 

 See section 4.2.2 for selected traffic control schemes for Riverside Bridge Project and the 

CPM Project. 

5.2. Transportation Operations Plan 

The general strategies for operations and management of the work zones include: 

 Air traffic will not be affected. 

 Work will be suspended during holiday periods, as defined by the project engineer. All 

work shall be coordinated around local festivals. 

 Custom signs, (RUMBLE STRIPS) and (ATTENTION MOTORCYCLISTS) signs 

included in the quantities should be placed as the lead signs in the sign sequence when 

traffic is shifted. These signs will be placed on both sides of the roadway. 

 W20-15b (WATCH FOR TRAFFIC BACKUPS/BE PREPARED TO STOP) signs should 

be placed at the Point of Beginning (POB) for WB and POB for EB and 5 miles in advance 

of each POB on the right and left of the roadway. 

 A minimum of two R11-4MOD (OVERWIDTH VEHICLES PROHIBITED/10-FOOT 

MAXIMUM WIDTH) signs should be placed (1) at 1⁄2 mile before the interchange of I94BL/M-37/Columbia Ave/Skyline/Martin Luther King Blvd/Exit 92 (eastbound) and (2) 

in advance of the interchange of M-294/Beadle Lake Road/Exit 100 (westbound). 

 Portable Changeable Message Signs (PCMS) will be used to warn traffic of upcoming work 

and changing traffic control during the life of the project. The PCMS will be installed and 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-10 

operational a minimum of 7 calendar days prior to the start of work. The proposed PCMS 

message sequence to be used is given below: 

 Notify the Battle Creek Area Transit Authority in advance of any roadway maintaining 

traffic changes to decrease any impacts to normal transit routes. 

 Law enforcement will be asked to provide patrol of the work zone. 

 Restrict access for construction vehicles between traveled lanes and work areas to specific 

locations. The number of access points and their locations require prior approval from the 

Engineer. 

The strategies for operations and management of the I-94 CPM Project are as follows: 

 Maintain two lanes of traffic on I-94 during the following hours: 

― Monday through Thursday, 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 

― Friday, 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 

― Saturday, 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. 

― Sunday, noon to 9:00 p.m. 

 Remove all signs and traffic control devices during the hours of the above lane restrictions, 

according to the special provision for temporary removal of portable signs. If the signs are 

displayed during the restricted hours, then the contractor is charged liquidated damages of 

$333 for every 15 minutes the signs are displayed. 

Riverside Bridge Project 

Advance Notice for Road Work Notice for Road Work 

BRIDGE 

WORK 

XX/XX/XX 

2 LANES 

WILL 

BE OPEN 

 BRIDGE 

WORK 

2 LANE 

TRAFFIC 

SHIFT 

Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 1 Sequence 2 

I-94 CPM Project 

Advance Notice for Road Work Notice for Road Work 

ROAD WORK 

BEGINS 

XX/XX/XX 

NIGHT 

WORK 

UTILIZED 

 

NIGHT 

LANE 

CLOSURES 

Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 1 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-11 

 Provide transverse and longitudinal HMA tapers at all grade changes caused by cold 

milling and overlays. Pave all cold-milled areas the same day as the cold milling operation 

is performed. Allow no traffic on the cold-milled surface, unless otherwise approved by the 

Engineer. 

 Place lighted plastic drums for the WHOLE length of the project on BOTH sides of the EB 

and WB I-94. 

 When not in use, store the lighted plastic drums along the edge of the shoulders. Do not 

drag drums across open lanes of traffic on a routine basis. 

 During the paving operation, when the lap joint will be exposed to traffic, place a solid 

white lane line on the tapered portion of the joint, in addition to the solid white edgeline. 

Within the following work period, after the contractor has paved the adjacent lane to 

previous paving length, place a dashed white lane and 4-ft strips on 50-ft centers to 

delineate the center line, in addition to the solid yellow edgeline. 

 Place temporary pavement markings, Type NR paint, 4-inch white at 4-ft skips on 50-ft 

centers to delineate the centerline, prior to opening to traffic, at the end of each work night. 

 Place Temporary Paint (Type NR paint, 4-inch white and 4-inch yellow) to delineate the 

edge of the roadway lanes after each HMA course at the end of EACH working night, prior 

to opening to traffic. 

Incident Management Plan 

 Install permanent emergency routes signs along the I-94 corridor in the project limits to 

provide motorist guidance in the event of a traffic incident. 

 Maintain access for emergency vehicles at all times through coordination with the MDOT 

construction staff. 

5.3. Public Information Plan 

The following strategies will be used to inform the public and stakeholders about the project: 

 Circulate a project brochure detailing the type of project, the traffic control required to 

construct the job, and the time the project is expected to last. 

 Issue a press release before the project begins detailing the type of project, the traffic 

control required to construct the job, and the time the project is expected to last. 

 Keep the MDOT lane closure website up to date. 

 Attend Neighborhood Planning Counsel Meeting(s) to describe the upcoming project, 

provide status, and receive feedback. 

 Use portable changeable message signs (PCMS) to notify road users of upcoming work and 

changing traffic control throughout the life of the project. Install the PCMS and keep 

operational a minimum of 7 calendar days prior to the start of work. 

Table 4 provides a summary of work zone impact management strategies. 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-12 

Table 4: Summary of Work Zone Impact Management Strategies5

 

5

 The strategies and sample cost shown are for demonstration purposes only. When the TMP is incorporated in the 

contract documents, the cost items typically are not shown.

Temporary Traffic Control √ Cost ($) 

Control Strategies 

1. Construction phasing/staging √

2. Full roadway closures 

3. Lane shifts or closures √

4. One-lane, two-way controlled operation 

5. Two-way traffic on one side of facility. Reversible lanes 

6. Ramp closures/relocation 

7. Freeway-to-freeway interchange closures 

8. Night work √

9. Weekend work 

10. Work hour restrictions for peak travel √

11. Pedestrian/Bicycle access improvements 

12. Business access improvements 

13. Off-site detours/use of alternate routes √

Traffic Control Devices

14. Temporary signs √ 300-500

15. Arrow panels √ 5,000-10,000

16. Channelizing devices √

17. Temporary pavement markings √

18. Flaggers and uniformed traffic control officers √

19. Temporary traffic signals √ 100,000-250,000

20. Lighting devices √

Project Coordination Strategies

21. Other area projects √

22. Utilities √

23. Right-of-Way 

24. Other transportation infrastructure 

Innovative Contracting Strategies 

25. Design-Build 

26. A+B Bidding 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-13 

 

Temporary Traffic Control √ Cost ($) 

27. Incentive/Disincentive clauses 

28. Lane rental 

29. Performance specifications 

Innovative or Accelerated Construction Techniques 

30. Prefabricated/Precast elements 

31. Rapid cure materials 

Transportation Operations √ Cost ($) 

Demand Management Strategies 

1. Transit service improvements 

2. Transit incentives 

3. Shuttle services 

4. Parking supply management 

5. Variable work hours 

6. Telecommuting 

7. Ridesharing/carpooling incentives 

8. Park-and-Ride promotion 

Corridor/Network Management Strategies 

9. Signal timing/coordination improvements 

10. Temporary traffic signals 

11. Street/Intersection improvements 

12. Bus turnouts 

13. Turn restrictions 

14. Parking restrictions 

15. Truck/Heavy vehicle restrictions 

16. Reversible lanes 

17. Dynamic lane closure system 

18. Ramp closures 

19. Railroad crossing controls 

20. Coordination with adjacent construction site(s) 

Work Zone ITS Strategies 

21. Late lane merge 

22. PCMS with speed display √ 20,000/each 

23. Travel time estimation system 
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-14 

Transportation Operations √ Cost ($) 

24. Advanced speed information system 

25. Advanced congestion warning system 

26. Conflict warning system (e.g., construction vehicles 

entering roadway) 

27. Travel time monitor system 

28. Freeway queue monitor system 

29. CCTV monitoring 

30. Real-time detour 

Work Zone Safety Management Strategies 

31. Speed limit reduction/variable speed limits 

32. Temporary traffic signals 

33. Temporary traffic barrier √

34. Movable traffic barrier systems √

35. Crash cushions √

36. Temporary rumble strips 

37. Intrusion alarms 

38. Warning lights 

39. Automated flagger assistance devices (AFADs) 

40. Project task force/committee √

41. Construction safety supervisors/inspectors 

42. Road safety audits 

43. TMP monitor/inspection team 

Incident Management and Enforcement Strategies 

44. ITS for traffic monitoring/management √

45. TMC √

46. Surveillance (e.g., CCTV) √ 5,000-7,000 /each 

47. Helicopter for aerial surveillance 

48. Traffic Screens 

49. Call boxes 

50. Milepost markers 

51. Tow/Freeway service patrol √

52. Total station units 

53. Photogrammetry 

54. Media coordination √ 250,000-500,000/year 

55. Local detour routes √
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-15 

Transportation Operations √ Cost ($) 

56. Contract support for incident management 

57. Incident/Emergency management coordination 

58. Incident/Emergency response plan 

59. Dedicated (paid) police enforcement 

60. Cooperative police enforcement 

61. Automated enforcement 

62. Increased penalties for work zone violations √

63. Emergency pull-offs 

Public Information √ Cost ($) 

Public Awareness Strategies 

1. Branding 

2. Press kits 

3. Brochures and mailers √ 2,000–5,000/each

4. Press releases/media alerts √

5. Mass media (earned and/or paid) 

6. Paid advertisements √ 3,000–5,000/15 seconds 

7. Project Information Center/Kiosk √

8. Telephone hotline 

9. Planned lane closure website 

10. Project website √ 20,000-25,000/ initial setup 

11. Public meetings/hearings, workshops √

12. Community task forces 

13. Coordination with media/schools/business/emergency 

services 

14. Work zone education and safety campaigns 

15. Work zone safety highway signs √

16. Rideshare promotions 

17. Visual information 

Motorist Information Strategies 

18. Radio traffic news √

19. Changeable message signs √ 18,000-20,000/each

20. Temporary motorist information signs 

21. Dynamic speed message sign √ 6,000-8,000/each 

22. Highway Advisory Radio (HAR) √
Sample Transportation Management Plan 2

Moderate-to-Major Impacts

F-16 

6.0 TMP Implementation/Monitoring 

In accordance with the MDOT Work Zone Safety and Mobility Manual, work zone monitoring 

will be completed by the region/TSC traffic and safety engineer. After initial implementation of 

the TMP, traffic delay monitoring, analysis and documentation are required during the life of the 

project. In addition, work zone crashes are to be documented and an analysis should be 

conducted to ensure that crash numbers have not increased. If monitoring of the work zone 

indicates that the actual delay times have exceeded the threshold limits anticipated or crash 

numbers have increased, then the need for adjustments in the TOP is to be considered. 

7.0 TMP Review/Approvals 

Note: In Michigan, the region engineer and region system manager are notified if after all 

mitigation measures have been applied, the project is still expected to exceed the mobility 

threshold limits (see footnote 2, page 1), or the TMP costs exceed 25% of the projects costs. The 

region is then responsible for contacting the Safety and Mobility Peer Team (SMPT) for a 

project review. The purpose of the SMPT is to conduct independent reviews and/or inspections 

of projects and provide recommendations to the Chief Operations Officer for approval before 

any implementations are made. See Appendix G for a sample Safety and Mobility Peer Team 

Review for this project. 

8.0 Appendices 

A. Hourly Count Reports 

B. Crash Analysis & Safety Review 

C. Traffic Analysis Reports 

D. Clauses 

E. Maintenance of Traffic Concept/Typical 

F. Design Plans/Typical 

G. Safety and Mobility Peer Team Review 

Public Information √ Cost ($) 

23. Extinguishable Signs 

24. Highway information network (web-based) 

25. Traveler information systems(wireless, handheld) 

26. Transportation Management Center (TMC) √

27. Live traffic camera(s) on a website 

28. Project information hotline 

29. Email alerts 
Sample Appendices 

Moderate-to-Major Impacts (Sample TMP 2) 

A. Hourly Count Reports 

B. Crash Analysis & Safety Review 

C. Traffic Analysis Reports 

D. Clauses 

E. Maintenance of Traffic Concept/Typical 

F. Design Plans/Typical 

G. Safety and Mobility Peer Team Review 

A. Hourly Count Reports 
	



	




 	 	

  











 

!! !!! 

	 "
#





	&'
(#	$%

	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (

)    ! ! )  !)  

 )()!
*

)) ("$$

+, +, , ,  !!#$  - &-

!! ! ! ! )      )!  !   !  ! ) ) ))  

 )")!.
*

*

! (#&%(

+, +, , , !!'! !( &- &-

)! !) !! !    )!    ))   )! !  )) !    

 )#)!,*

 (#"$$

+, +, , , !!  !(# &- %-

)! !)  !!    !  !   ) !   

 )$)!/*

&# "

+, +, , , ! (# ((' &- $-
	



	




 	 	

  











 

!! )!! 

	 "
#





	&'
(#$%

	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (

) ! !     )!!

 )()!
*

 (""'&

+, +, , ,  !#('  - %-

!! )     )       ) )) !!)  ) 

 )")!.
*

*

! (#%!"

+, +, , ,  ' $ !$( - &-

! !! ) ) !) ) )!  )) )      !   ! ! ! )

 )#)!,*

! ("' %

+, +, , ,  '%( !"(# !- &-

) ! ! )   )! ) )   ) ! )  )) 

 )$)!/*

  $(

+, +, , ,  ' ' (!%% !- %-
	



	




 	 	

  











 

!! !!! 

	 "
#





	&'
(#	$%

	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (

 )) !  ! !! !  !! ) ))

%)!()!!
*

) ($%%$

+, +, , ,  '!" !##$ !- %-

) ! )) ! )!  !  )  )  !  ! !)! ! !  

%)!")!!.
*

*

) (&#&&

+, +, , , !&% !$ ! !- %-

)  ! ! ! !   )  ) ) 

%)!#)!!,*

)) "( "

+, +, , , ! (' ! '% - (-
	



	




 	 	

  











 

!! )!! 

	 "
#





	&'
(#$%

	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (

! )    ! )   !   )

%)!()!!
*

! (&##!

+, +, , , ! # !$% !- &-

) ! ! ! !) )) )) !!  ! ) ) ) !) ! ! !  !   ! 

%)!")!!.
*

*

) (&'''

+, +, , , !!%' !$# !- &-

) !  ! ! )) !  )! !) !  

%)!#)!!,*

))) ""!$

+, +, , , ! (# !!' !- (-
	



	
!



 	 	

  











 

!! !!! 

	 "
#





	&'
(#	$%

	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (

! )   !!  !    

$)!!)!"
*

)) (%##"

+, +, , ,  !$ &  - %-

))!  !) )!      )! ! !  )) ! ! )  !)) ) )

$)!()!".
*

*

! ('!""

+, +, , , !!!& !$#' &- &-

 )!  !  )) ) )  )    ) !! ! ) )!)! 

$)!")!",*

! ('"%%

+, +, , , !!"% !$# &- $-

)  ) !! ! )   !  ) )) !  ))! ) )!  !)  

$)!#)!"/*

!) (%&#

+, +, , , !!#! !'& - %-

) !   ) )      ) !  ) )  ))     )

$)!$)!"*

 !$!$%

+, +, , , !"% ! # !- (-

)  !  !  )  ) ! ! )! )   ) ! ) !  )) !) !

$)!%)!"
*

) (&'%

+, +, , ,  %#" !"&# !- %-

) !   ! ))  )    ! )! ) 

$)!&)!"
*

 '#"

+, +, , ,  &$ !(%' '- %-
	



	




 	 	

  











 

!! !!! 

	 "
#





	&'
(#	$%

	



 








	



	
)



 	 	

  











 

!! )!! 

	 "
#





	&'
(#$%

	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (

   ! )  )! ! )  

$)!!)!"
*

) (&(!"

+, +, , ,  !%  - &-

) !)  ! !!  !  )  !     )  !! )) )  ! 

$)!()!".
*

*

! ('!!$

+, +, , , ! &' !#! !- &-

! ! !  ! )! !) )  ) !!     !! )  )    

$)!")!",*

! "&(&

+, +, , , !!## !'%$ - %-

) !!   !)!!      )  )  ) !! ) !   )

$)!#)!"/*

) ('( $

+, +, , , !" % (' !- $-

!  ! !! )  ! )       )  )   ! 

$)!$)!"*

!$("!

+, +, , , ! $! !"& !- "-

! ! )    )  ) ! )       !! ! 

$)!%)!"
*

(%"( 

+, +, , ,  &'% !!( !- &-

 ))  )   )  )    !   

$)!&)!"
*

!) '!'"

+, +, , , !!($ !" & !- %-
	



	




 	 	

  











 

!! )!! 

	 "
#





	&'
(#$%

	



 








	



	




 	 	

  











		 
 

	


	
 

	 




 
	

	
 	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (


        

 )()!
*


 ( $"

+, +, , ,  !''  - %-

  
   
 
 
 
 
      
 
 

 )")!.
*

*

 ( ##

+, +, , ,  $'$ ! (( &- &-


 

 

   

 
  
 
 
    
 

 )#)!,*


  '$

+, +, , ,  $#' !!" !- %-
	



	




 	 	

  











		 
 

	

	
 

	 




 


	
 	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (

 
 
   
  

 )()!
*

( &!

+, +, , ,  !!(#  - %-


  
   
   
    

   
    

 )")!.
*

*


 (!$$ 

+, +, , ,  %&$ !((% - %-


    
 
   
       
 

 )#)!,*

  $%'

+, +, , ,  & ' ! !% !- &-
	



	




 	 	

  











		 
 

	


	
 

	 




 
	

	
 	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (

 

    
 
   
   

%)!()!!
*


 (# %&

+, +, , ,  &## !"#( !- %-

 
  

     
   
  
   

   


%)!")!!.
*

*

 (%!%$

+, +, , ,  '% !#& !- %-

   
  
   

%)!#)!!,*

 " #

+, +, , , !'  -
	



	




 	 	

  











		 
 

	

	
 

	 




 


	
 	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (

  

  
 
  
 

%)!()!!
*


 (#%%&

+, +, , , !&& !"# !- $-

  
     
    
 
 
 
  

%)!")!!.
*

*


 (%!(#

+, +, , , ! &# !#$% !- %-

  
 

  
    
 

%)!#)!!,*

 ""#&

+, +, , , !(!#  !-
	



	





 	 	

  











		 
 

	


	
 

	 




 
	

	
 	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (

 
   

   


$) %)!",*


(# "&

+, +, , ,  !#!  - %-


 
  
    
    
   

   

$) &)!"/*


 ($ %#

+, +, , ,  &%$ !(&" - %-

  

 

     
  
  

 
 

$) ')!"*

 #% 

+, +, , ,  && !(!( - $-
	



	




 	 	

  











		 
 

	

	
 

	 




 


	
 	



 









   ! " # $ % & '   ! ( " # $ % & ' ! !  !! !" !( !" (

  

 

  

$) %)!",*


 (%"%'

+, +, , ,  !!(  - &-

 
  
 
  
  
 
 
  
 

 
 
 
 

$) &)!"/*


 ('!'(

+, +, , , !"&' !"'# '- (-


 

  


 
  
  

 
 
  
 

$) ')!"*


 $'((

+, +, , , !"  !## !- (-
0123456712896:;<139

*+,*-,.**/0123454674/

=9>9?18 7=6@ 7=6AB

B:6@ B:6AB :129;6C;DE

=9>9?186C;DE

4-*

89-+

54:8;<4=><>4?@4:9AA

4B>+A 45.-AC*A45>5C 45D*/.

7?95 =6E3

C?3;E9?18 =6FG9<1G

16E 712895

F;>3 4.**.

ACGH6I6J23;>261K6H3>8D<139>9?186B4>88?8L

C>5 M MM M!MM M"MM M#MM M$MM M%MM M&MM M'MM MMM MM !MM (MM "MM #MM $MM %MM &MM 'MM !MMM ! MM !!MM !"MM !(MM !"601236H19>4 M(MM

4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 5BDD 5/CC 5//- 5-/- 4.5.5 4.DC. 4.+CD ..+5 45//. 5C*- 5++5 45DA* 55D+ 4-5A

M%)!()!MM!6H2;D*>5

.+/BC 6(# %&

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6 &## 6!"#( !-MM %-MM

4B5B 4CBB 4+/+ 4CCD 4A*+ 4B-B 45DDD 5AB- 5BC* 45/*- 5-.B 5-B5 5-CA .55A 4..*. 4.+++ 4.C/5 .+DD 4.*D- 5ACC 5+-5 45DD+ 55A* 5*/C

M%)!")!MM!6.;*8;D*>5

DAA-B 6(%!%$

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6 '% 6!#& !-MM %-MM

4B+5 4A*B 4A*D 4C+5 4B*5 4/BA 45DD* 5/5A 5/CB 45/5* .*-5 .*5+ 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4*

M%)!#)!MM!6H,23D*>5

5+-/B 6" M#

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6!M' 6M -MM
0123456712896:;<139

*+,*-,.**/01234.4674/

=9>9?18 7=6@ 7=6AB

B:6@ B:6AB :129;6C;DE

=9>9?186C;DE

4-*

89-+

54:8;<4=><>4?@4:9AA

4B>+A 45.-B**-45>5C 45D*/.

7?95 =6E3

C?3;E9?18 6G93G

16E 712895

F;>3 4.**.

ACGH6I6J23;>261K6H3>8D<139>9?186B4>88?8L

C>5 M MM M!MM M"MM M#MM M$MM M%MM M&MM M'MM MMM MM !MM (MM "MM #MM $MM %MM &MM 'MM !MMM ! MM !!MM !"MM !(MM !"601236H19>4 M(MM

4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* .*AB .*// .*A* .*CC 4..5. 4.+*C 4.DC* .D/- 45/5* 5+-. 5./* 45DC* 5*+D 4//B

M%)!()!MM!6H2;D*>5

.C+// 6(#%%&

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6!M&& 6!"M# !-MM $-MM

4AB/ 4+BA 4+.. 4+BC 4+/D 4A-* 45./B 5-5+ 5//A 45-B- .**A .5/C .5DA .5-/ 4../B 4.DD- 4.CAB .CD/ 45-C* 5ABD 5+AA 45DC/ 55A5 4-**

M%)!")!MM!6.;*8;D*>5

DB*C+ 6(%!(#

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6! &# 6!#$% !-MM %-MM

4A-* 4+/5 4+++ 4C*/ 4C+* 4BC5 45D++ 5BC5 5-5D 4.*+- .5DD .D.C 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4*

M%)!#)!MM!6H,23D*>5

5+-.- 6""#&

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6!(!# 6M !-MM
0123456712896:;<139

*+,*-,.**/01234B4674/

=9>9?18 7=6@ 7=6AB

B:6@ B:6AB :129;6C;DE

=9>9?186C;DE

4-*

89-+

54:8;<4=><>4?@4:9AA

4B>+A 45.-AC*A45>5C 45D*/.

7?95 =6E3

C?3;E9?18 =6FG9<1G

16E 712895

F;>3 4.**+

ACGH6I6J23;>261K6H3>8D<139>9?186B4>88?8L

C>5 M MM M!MM M"MM M#MM M$MM M%MM M&MM M'MM MMM MM !MM (MM "MM #MM $MM %MM &MM 'MM !MMM ! MM !!MM !"MM !(MM !"601236H19>4 M(MM

4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4..AB 4.C*. .D5D 45//. 5C5C 5+-. 45.A+ 5*+A 4/DC

M$) %)!MM"6H,23D*>5

5C55A 6(# "&

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6M 6!#M! M -MM %-MM

4/D* 4CA* 4+-+ 4C+B 4AA. 4//C 45D5B 5B.- 5/*. 45/*A 5/BA 5/AC 5BD/ 5/-. 4.*.- 4.DC- 4.D/+ .DA* 45//B 5CD* 5+/C 45D-/ 5.+- 4-D*

M$) &)!MM"6/3?*>5

DCA5+ 6($ %#

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6 &%$ 6!(&" -MM %-MM

4/DD 4AA5 4C+* 4C*B 4ABA 4/CC 45D.D 5/+5 5B/5 45//5 5/CA 5BBB 5/// .55A 4.*C/ 4.D.D 45/CC 5C.D 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4*

M$) ')!MM"6=>923*>5

.A.-+ 6#%M 

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6 && 6!(!( M-MM $-MM
0123456712896:;<139

*+,*-,.**/01234/4674/

=9>9?18 7=6@ 7=6AB

B:6@ B:6AB :129;6C;DE

=9>9?186C;DE

4-*

89-+

54:8;<4=><>4?@4:9AA

4B>+A 45.-B**-45>5C 45D*/.

7?95 =6E3

C?3;E9?18 6G93G

16E 712895

F;>3 4.**+

ACGH6I6J23;>261K6H3>8D<139>9?186B4>88?8L

C>5 M MM M!MM M"MM M#MM M$MM M%MM M&MM M'MM MMM MM !MM (MM "MM #MM $MM %MM &MM 'MM !MMM ! MM !!MM !"MM !(MM !"601236H19>4 M(MM

4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4.*5* 4.5/* ..*D 45B+- 5CCD 5DCC 45.5A 4--5 4B-+

M$) %)!MM"6H,23D*>5

5+*C5 6(%"%'

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6M 6!!M( M -MM &-MM

4AD- 4+BA 4C5. 4+/- 4CD* 4AB. 45+C- ..A* .+/- 4.+5C .D-- ..-* .+-C .5C/ 4.5+C 4.D** 4..+/ .D/C 4.DCC 5-DC 5C.D 45D*C 55.* 4-*.

M$) &)!MM"6/3?*>5

D-C*5 6('!'(

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6!"&' 6!"'# M'-MM (-MM

4B.C 4C5* 4C*5 4+-. 4C5* 4ACC 45+/C .5*A .+*. 4.D+C ..B5 .+5* .C*C .5C/ 4.5+C 4.D** 4..+/ .D/C 4* 4* 4* 4* 4* 4*

M$) ')!MM"6=>923*>5

D*5CD 6$'((

+A60?L, +A60?L,60123 BA60?L, BA60?L,60123 6!" M 6!#M# !-MM (-MM
CS MP

Route Desc PR MPCounty

I-94

5.455.45

CS #PR #

Calhoun 13081

1296506

91 Station

03/21/2007 HOURLY COUNT REPORT

0100 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 0200 0300 0400 2300 2400 24HourTotal DAY

East Direction Year 20040.3 MI E OF CAPITAL AV (0.8 MI W OF M-66) Station Desc City None

2618 17:00 01:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2045 2217 2314 2618 2553 1969 1598 1412 1321

AM High: 0

1101

37554

20077

929

Tuesday 06/22/2004

2659 18:00 08:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

770 521 430 418 517 725 1402 2228 2221 2109 2002 2075 2059 2154 2318 2377 2596 2659 2067 1663 1577 1273

AM High: 2228

1170

39244

38542

1211

Wednesday 06/23/2004

2650 16:00 08:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

864 765 482 459 633 787 1420 2247 2197 2192 2072 1992 2069 2101 2397 2650 2546 2635 2071 1740 1580 1375

AM High: 2247

1200

39477

39534

1060

Thursday 06/24/2004

2981 17:00 11:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

764 614 478 490 556 805 1327 2002 2223 2110 2252 2222 2279 2630 2727 2895 2981 2775 2371 2075 1882 1572

AM High: 2252

1293

37850

42357

1034

Friday 06/25/2004

2151 13:00 12:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

729 465 412 333 376 417 618 1049 1428 1628 1962 2047 2151 2048 1979 1837 1842 1778 1696 1441 1200 1102

AM High: 2047

944

26267

30202

720

Saturday 06/26/2004

2485 17:00 12:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

487 321 254 203 195 198 373 439 769 1156 1453 1754 2078 2261 2282 2147 2485 2380 2274 1952 2293 1771

AM High: 1754

1357

38097

31987

1105

Sunday 06/27/2004

2379 17:00 09:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

703 526 422 449 511 790 1287 1846 1860 1792 1803 1833 1968 2051 2270 2354 2379 0 0 0 0 0

AM High: 1860

0

9054

24844

0

Monday 06/28/2004
CS MP

Route Desc PR MPCounty

I-94

5.455.45

CS #PR #

Calhoun 13081

1297009

91 Station

03/21/2007 HOURLY COUNT REPORT

0100 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 0200 0300 0400 2300 2400 24HourTotal DAY

West Direction Year 20040.3 MI E OF CAPITAL AV (0.8 MI W OF M-66) Station Desc City None

2701 18:00 01:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2326 2196 2449 2542 2701 1939 1765 1536 1271

AM High: 0

1184

38324

20878

969

Tuesday 06/22/2004

2520 18:00 12:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

671 517 462 435 535 822 1506 2114 1997 2069 1985 2189 2144 2248 2343 2497 2496 2520 2165 1677 1667 1436

AM High: 2189

1153

39226

38582

934

Wednesday 06/23/2004

2976 17:00 11:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

651 495 539 482 548 875 1567 2097 2048 2097 2255 2228 2208 2361 2331 2553 2976 2943 2176 1910 1692 1493

AM High: 2255

1186

40838

40659

948

Thursday 06/24/2004

3090 16:00 12:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

667 505 431 434 560 755 1461 1942 2044 2109 2336 2417 2608 2703 3086 3090 3020 2879 2585 2272 1985 1662

AM High: 2417

1248

39316

43746

947

Friday 06/25/2004

2048 14:00 12:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

590 446 361 259 255 440 742 1148 1458 1874 2113 2162 1991 2048 1962 1990 1811 1748 1642 1372 1201 1103

AM High: 2162

925

26342

30330

689

Saturday 06/26/2004

2230 18:00 12:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

495 315 237 128 139 188 337 461 817 1180 1541 1897 2116 2116 2182 2204 2184 2230 2133 2090 1855 1600

AM High: 1897

1235

37431

30600

920

Sunday 06/27/2004

2418 17:00 12:00 PM High Hour: PM High: AM High Hour:

601 470 390 376 484 732 1443 1929 1784 1861 2087 2236 2289 2298 2256 2322 2418 0 0 0 0 0

AM High: 2236

0

9294

25976

0

Monday 06/28/2004
B. Crash Analysis & Safety Review 
DATE: March 4, 2008 

TO: Raja Jildeh, Supervising Engineer, Lansing Bridge Design Unit 

FROM: Angie Kremer, Traffic & Safety Engineer, Marshall TSC 

SUBJECT: Crash Analysis & Safety Review 

CS 13081 JN 75047 

I-94 Structures S05-3 & S05-4 of 13081, Riverside Drive Bridges 

I have conducted a crash analysis and safety review for a three year period (January 1, 2005 – 

December 31, 2007) of the following locations. 

I-94 Structures S05-3 & S05-04 of 13081, Riverside Drive Bridges 

The proposed project consists of a total structure replacement for both structures. The structures 

are in a horizontal curve and the super elevation will be built to current standards. The following 

table describes the roadway, ADT and level-of-service: 

Control Section Bound BMP to EMP Type of Road way ADT LOS

13081 East 0.642 4L-2W 27,900 C

13081 West 0.640 4L-2W 27,900 C

Crash Analysis & Safety Review I-94 Eastbound 

Three year period (January 1, 2005 – December 31, 2007) were reviewed for this location using 

the TMS database. The segment analyzed was 0.2 miles east and west of S05-3 of 13081. Eight 

(8) crashes occurred at this location in the three year study period. The crashes are as 

summarized in the table below. 

Crash Type Crash Count Percentage

Fixed Object 3 37.5

Sideswipe Same 2 25.0

Miscellaneous Vehicle 1 12.5

Overturn 1 12.5

Other Object 1 12.5

No fatalities or disabling injuries occurred from any of the crashes. One crash was alcohol 

related, a fixed object crash. Driver hit guardrail and was cited for OWI. 

Four crashes were due to weather conditions either being icy, snowy or wet. The wet crash the 

officer noted on the crash report that driver needed to replace tires. 
Two crashes were either due to passing or quick lane changes that caused swerving. 

The remaining crash was road debris that fell off a trailer the driver was behind. 

No correctable crash patterns exist at this location on I-94 eastbound for which safety 

countermeasures will be necessary beyond the current scope of work. 

Crash Analysis & Safety Review I-94 Westbound 

Three year period (January 1, 2005 – December 31, 2007) were reviewed for this location using 

the TMS database. The segment analyzed was 0.2 miles east and west of S05-4 of 13081. Eight 

(8) crashes occurred at this location in the three year study period. The crashes are as 

summarized in the table below. 

Crash Type Crash Count Percentage

Animal 2 25.0

Sideswipe Same 2 25.0

Rear-end Straight 1 12.5

Angle Straight 1 12.5

Miscellaneous Vehicle 1 12.5

Fixed Object 1 12.5

No fatalities or disabling injuries occurred from any of the crashes. Also no crashes were alcohol 

related. 

The animal and sideswipe crashes were the predominate crash pattern for this area. The animal 

crashes were not deer crashes. One crash involved a turkey and the other a dog.

Two crashes (sideswipe same and angle straight crash) were due to the ramp merge area. One of 

the crashes the driver lost control of a trailer and the other crash the roadway was marked as 

“icy”.

One crash was construction related. The vehicle was stopped due to construction and one of the 

vehicles then started to roll back and stuck the vehicle behind. 

The remaining three crashes were either due to weather conditions or quick lane changes that 

caused swerving. 

No correctable crash patterns exist at this location on I-94 westbound for which safety 

countermeasures will be necessary beyond the current scope of work. 

Crash Analysis & Safety Review Riverside Drive 

Three year period (January 1, 2005 – December 31, 2007) were reviewed for this location using 

the TMS database. The segment analyzed was 0.076 miles north and south of I-94 on Riverside 

 





















































E I 94

W I 94

niM

seg

orB

ko

W I 94/Helmer

E I 94/Helmer

H

e

l

m

e

r

He me l r W/ I 94

He ml er E/ I 94

Beck el y

Watkins 

0 .02 .04 .06

Miles

Crash code

Multiple (205)Animal (17)An-St (3)An-Tn (1)Du-Rt(1)Fxobj (51)

 Hd-On (1) Msc-Mlt (6) Msc-Sng (6) O-Obj (7) Oturn (11) Prkng (1) Re-Rt (2) Re-St (16) Ss-Op (1) Ss-Sm (14)

JN102807 CS 13081 & 13082

Crashes 1/1/05 - 12/31/08

3 Fxobj, 2 Re-St, Animal, An-St, & O-Obj

2 Animal

2 Fxobj, Msc-Sng, Oturn, Re-St

Re-St & Ss-Sm

2 Animal & Msc-Sng

Oturn, Fxobj, & Re-St

Fxobj & Re-St

2 Ss-Sm, 2Re-St, An-St, Fxobj, & Msc-Mlt

2 Animal & 2 Oturn

Animal, Fxobj, Msc-Mlt, O-Obj, & Re-St

3 Re-St Animal & Fxobj

Fxobj & Oturn

3 Ss-Sm, 2 Fxobj, O-Obj, & Oturn

2 Re-St, Ss-Sm, & Animal

4 Re-St






 







94 

Watkins

E I 94

W I 94

Nichols

Minges Brook

Beckley

Summit

Battle Creek Rest Area

M

i

nge

s

Knapp

S

o

n

o

m

a

Peachtree

T

h

o

rn

a

p

p

l

e

ar

ol

F

Timothy

Wildrose

W

o

o

d

b

i

n

e

Co

l

u

m

b

i

n

e

B

i

r

c

h

w

o

o

d

L

oi

s

Ha

m

i

l

t

o



0 .04 .08 .12

Miles

Crash code

Multiple (205)Animal (17)An-St (3)An-Tn (1)Du-Rt(1)Fxobj (51)

 Hd-On (1) Msc-Mlt (6) Msc-Sng (6) O-Obj (7) Oturn (11) Prkng (1) Re-Rt (2) Re-St (16) Ss-Op (1) Ss-Sm (14)

urn

JN102807 CS 13081 & 13082

Crashes 1/1/05 - 12/31/08

2 Fxobj, Msc-Mlt, Re-St, & Ss-Sm

3 Ss-Sm, 2 Animal, Msc-Mlt, O-Obj

Fxobj, O-Obj, Re-St & Ss-Op

Fxobj & Msc-Mlt

4 Animal, An-St, Hd-On, & Oturn






 













 











  



















94 

E I 94

Christy

W I 94 W I 94/5 Mile

rB i

kc

ay

dr

rC

ee k

Ca

p

i

t

a

l

Beckley

e

d

i

s

r

ev

i

R

E I 94/Beckley

5 Mi el W/ I 94

Beck el y E/ I 94

Shortr di ge

Mason

s

i

o

L

H

a

m

i

l

t

o

n

D

u

n

h

a

m

k

r

a

m

t

i

W

M

i

n

g

e

s

Cr

e

e

k

Hi

l

l

Brookf ei dl

Knapp



0 .03 .06 .09

Miles

Crash code

Multiple (205)Animal (17)An-St (3)An-Tn (1)Du-Rt(1)Fxobj (51)

 Hd-On (1) Msc-Mlt (6) Msc-Sng (6) O-Obj (7) Oturn (11) Prkng (1) Re-Rt (2) Re-St (16) Ss-Op (1) Ss-Sm (14)

JN102807 CS 13081 & 13082

Crashes 1/1/05 - 12/31/08

Fxobj, Msc-Sng, & Re-St O-Obj, Animal, & Re-St 2 Ss-Sm, Animal, Fx-Obj, & Re-St

Fx-Obj, Oturn, & Ss-Sm

Fx-Obj & Msc-Mlt

Fxobj & Re-Lt

2 Re-St & An-St

Animal, O-Obj, & Ss-Sm

2 Fxobj, O-Obj, & Ss-Sm

2 Animal & Re-St

2 Ss-Sm, Fxobj, & An-St














































 







































































N 1I 49 E I / 49

rB ci yk ra d rC ee k

E I 94 N/ I 194

W I 94 S/ I 194

W I 94

W/ 491I N 49I

E I 94

Reyn

66 M

S 1I 49 E/ 9I 4

a H i m otl n

Brookf ei dl

491I N

491I S

49I W/ 491I S

49I E S/ 491I

Minges Brook



0 .02 .04 .06

Miles

Crash code

Multiple (205)Animal (17)An-St (3)An-Tn (1)Du-Rt(1)Fxobj (51)

 Hd-On (1) Msc-Mlt (6) Msc-Sng (6) O-Obj (7) Oturn (11) Prkng (1) Re-Rt (2) Re-St (16) Ss-Op (1) Ss-Sm (14)

St

JN102807 CS 13081 & 13082

Crashes 1/1/05 - 12/31/08

Re-St, Msc-Mlt, & Animal

Fxobj & Oturn

Fxobj & Animal

Ss-Sm & Re-St

Fxobj & Msc-Mlt

2 Ss-Sm

3 Animal, 2 Oturn, Fxobj

2 Re-St

Fxobj & Oturn

An-St & Ss-Sm

Re-St & Fxobj

2 Fxobj, 2 O-Obj, Animal, Ss-Op

4 Fxobj








































94 

94 

W I 94

E I 94

D

L

a

d

y

J

e

s

s

i

c

a

H

a

r

p

e

r

C

re

e

k

Harper

Creek

E I 94 B/ ead el Lake

Beadle

Lake

Bach

E

m

b

u

ry

Lamson

6

1

/

2

M

i

l

e

Hoover

W I 94 N/ I 194

iM

gn

se

rB

oo k

Ryans Chr si t ai n

Be E



0 .04 .08 .12

Miles

Crash code

Multiple (205)Animal (17)An-St (3)An-Tn (1)Du-Rt(1)Fxobj (51)

 Hd-On (1) Msc-Mlt (6) Msc-Sng (6) O-Obj (7) Oturn (11) Prkng (1) Re-Rt (2) Re-St (16) Ss-Op (1) Ss-Sm (14)

JN102807 CS 13081 & 13082

Crashes 1/1/05 - 12/31/08

Animal & Oturn

Fxobj & Oturn

Animal & Fxobj

2 O-Obj, Oturn & Ss-Sm

Animal & Ss-Sm

Fxobj, Msc-Mlt, Msc-Sng, & Re-St

2 Animal, Msc-Sng, & O-Obj

Fxobj & Re-St
C. Traffic Analysis Reports 
I-94 WB by Riverside Bridge: Existing

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 6/22/04 V/C LOS 6/23/04 V/C LOS 6/24/04 V/C LOS 6/25/04 V/C LOS 6/26/04 V/C LOS 6/27/04 V/C LOS 6/28/04 V/C LOS

1:00 AM 671 0.20 A 651 0.19 A 667 0.19 A 590 0.17 A 495 0.14 A 601 0.18 A2:00 AM 517 0.15 A 495 0.14 A 505 0.15 A 446 0.13 A 315 0.09 A 470 0.14 A3:00 AM 462 0.13 A 539 0.16 A 431 0.13 A 361 0.11 A 237 0.07 A 390 0.11 A4:00 AM 435 0.13 A 482 0.14 A 434 0.13 A 259 0.08 A 128 0.04 A 376 0.11 A5:00 AM 535 0.16 A 548 0.16 A 560 0.16 A 255 0.07 A 139 0.04 A 484 0.14 A6:00 AM 822 0.24 A 875 0.26 A 755 0.22 A 440 0.13 A 188 0.05 A 732 0.21 A7:00 AM 1,506 0.44 A 1,567 0.46 A 1,461 0.43 A 742 0.22 A 337 0.10 A 1,443 0.42 A8:00 AM 2,114 0.62 A 2,097 0.61 A 1,942 0.57 A 1,148 0.34 A 461 0.13 A 1,929 0.56 A9:00 AM 1,997 0.58 A 2,048 0.60 A 2,044 0.60 A 1,458 0.43 A 817 0.24 A 1,784 0.52 A

10:00 AM 2,069 0.60 A 2,097 0.61 A 2,109 0.62 A 1,874 0.55 A 1,180 0.34 A 1,861 0.54 A11:00 AM 1,985 0.58 A 2,255 0.66 B 2,336 0.68 B 2,113 0.62 A 1,541 0.45 A 2,087 0.61 A12:00 PM 2,189 0.64 B 2,228 0.65 B 2,417 0.71 B 2,162 0.63 B 1,897 0.55 A 2,236 0.65 B

1:00 PM 2,144 0.63 A 2,208 0.64 B 2,608 0.76 C 1,991 0.58 A 2,116 0.62 A 2,289 0.67 B2:00 PM 2,326 0.68 B 2,248 0.66 B 2,361 0.69 B 2,703 0.79 C 2,048 0.60 A 2,116 0.62 A 2,298 0.67 B3:00 PM 2,196 0.64 B 2,343 0.68 B 2,331 0.68 B 3,086 0.90 D 1,962 0.57 A 2,182 0.64 B 2,256 0.66 B4:00 PM 2,449 0.72 B 2,497 0.73 B 2,553 0.75 B 3,090 0.90 D 1,990 0.58 A 2,204 0.64 B 2,322 0.68 B5:00 PM 2,542 0.74 B 2,496 0.73 B 2,976 0.87 D 3,020 0.88 D 1,811 0.53 A 2,184 0.64 B 2,418 0.71 B6:00 PM 2,701 0.79 C 2,520 0.74 B 2,943 0.86 D 2,879 0.84 D 1,748 0.51 A 2,230 0.65 B7:00 PM 1,939 0.57 A 2,165 0.63 B 2,176 0.64 B 2,585 0.76 B 1,642 0.48 A 2,133 0.62 A8:00 PM 1,765 0.52 A 1,677 0.49 A 1,910 0.56 A 2,272 0.66 B 1,372 0.40 A 2,090 0.61 A9:00 PM 1,536 0.45 A 1,667 0.49 A 1,692 0.49 A 1,985 0.58 A 1,201 0.35 A 1,855 0.54 A

10:00 PM 1,271 0.37 A 1,436 0.42 A 1,493 0.44 A 1,662 0.49 A 1,103 0.32 A 1,600 0.47 A11:00 PM 1,184 0.35 A 1,153 0.34 A 1,186 0.35 A 1,248 0.36 A 925 0.27 A 1,235 0.36 A12:00 AM 969 0.28 A 934 0.27 A 948 0.28 A 947 0.28 A 689 0.20 A 920 0.27 A

Total 20,878 38,582 40,659 43,746 30,330 30,600 25,976

Capacity LOS E

3,424 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors100% Lane Widths to 12 Feet100% Side Clearance on Both Sides 90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade
I-94 EB by Riverside Bridge:Existing

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 6/22/04 V/C LOS 6/23/04 V/C LOS 6/24/04 V/C LOS 6/25/04 V/C LOS 6/26/04 V/C LOS 6/27/04 V/C LOS 6/28/04 V/C LOS

1:00 AM 770 0.22 A 864 0.25 A 764 0.22 A 729 0.21 A 487 0.14 A 703 0.21 A2:00 AM 521 0.15 A 765 0.22 A 614 0.18 A 465 0.14 A 321 0.09 A 526 0.15 A3:00 AM 430 0.13 A 482 0.14 A 478 0.14 A 412 0.12 A 254 0.07 A 422 0.12 A4:00 AM 418 0.12 A 459 0.13 A 490 0.14 A 333 0.10 A 203 0.06 A 449 0.13 A5:00 AM 517 0.15 A 633 0.18 A 556 0.16 A 376 0.11 A 195 0.06 A 511 0.15 A6:00 AM 725 0.21 A 787 0.23 A 805 0.24 A 417 0.12 A 198 0.06 A 790 0.23 A7:00 AM 1,402 0.41 A 1,420 0.41 A 1,327 0.39 A 618 0.18 A 373 0.11 A 1,287 0.38 A8:00 AM 2,228 0.65 B 2,247 0.66 B 2,002 0.58 A 1,049 0.31 A 439 0.13 A 1,846 0.54 A9:00 AM 2,221 0.65 B 2,197 0.64 B 2,223 0.65 B 1,428 0.42 A 769 0.22 A 1,860 0.54 A

10:00 AM 2,109 0.62 A 2,192 0.64 B 2,110 0.62 A 1,628 0.48 A 1,156 0.34 A 1,792 0.52 A11:00 AM 2,002 0.58 A 2,072 0.61 A 2,252 0.66 B 1,962 0.57 A 1,453 0.42 A 1,803 0.53 A12:00 PM 2,075 0.61 A 1,992 0.58 A 2,222 0.65 B 2,047 0.60 A 1,754 0.51 A 1,833 0.54 A

1:00 PM 2,059 0.60 A 2,069 0.60 A 2,279 0.67 B 2,151 0.63 A 2,078 0.61 A 1,968 0.57 A2:00 PM 2,045 0.60 A 2,154 0.63 A 2,101 0.61 A 2,630 0.77 C 2,048 0.60 A 2,261 0.66 B 2,051 0.60 A3:00 PM 2,217 0.65 B 2,318 0.68 B 2,397 0.70 B 2,727 0.80 C 1,979 0.58 A 2,282 0.67 B 2,270 0.66 B4:00 PM 2,314 0.68 B 2,377 0.69 B 2,650 0.77 C 2,895 0.85 D 1,837 0.54 A 2,147 0.63 A 2,354 0.69 B5:00 PM 2,618 0.76 C 2,596 0.76 B 2,546 0.74 B 2,981 0.87 D 1,842 0.54 A 2,485 0.73 B 2,379 0.69 B6:00 PM 2,553 0.75 B 2,659 0.78 C 2,635 0.77 C 2,775 0.81 C 1,778 0.52 A 2,380 0.70 B7:00 PM 1,969 0.58 A 2,067 0.60 A 2,071 0.60 A 2,371 0.69 B 1,696 0.50 A 2,274 0.66 B8:00 PM 1,598 0.47 A 1,663 0.49 A 1,740 0.51 A 2,075 0.61 A 1,441 0.42 A 1,952 0.57 A9:00 PM 1,412 0.41 A 1,577 0.46 A 1,580 0.46 A 1,882 0.55 A 1,200 0.35 A 2,293 0.67 B

10:00 PM 1,321 0.39 A 1,273 0.37 A 1,375 0.40 A 1,572 0.46 A 1,102 0.32 A 1,771 0.52 A11:00 PM 1,101 0.32 A 1,170 0.34 A 1,200 0.35 A 1,293 0.38 A 944 0.28 A 1,357 0.40 A12:00 AM 929 0.27 A 1,211 0.35 A 1,060 0.31 A 1,034 0.30 A 720 0.21 A 1,105 0.32 A

Total 20,077 38,542 39,534 42,357 30,202 31,987 24,844

Capacity LOS E

3,424 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors100% Lane Widths to 12 Feet100% Side Clearance on Both Sides90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade
I-94 EB East of I-194/M-66:Exisiting

Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

Time 6/17/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS 6/19/04 V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 830 0.24 A 833 0.24 A

2:00 AM 560 0.16 A 661 0.19 A3:00 AM 494 0.14 A 540 0.16 A4:00 AM 547 0.16 A 507 0.15 A5:00 AM 662 0.19 A 676 0.20 A6:00 AM 885 0.26 A 855 0.25 A7:00 AM 1317 0.38 A 1323 0.39 A8:00 AM 1729 0.50 B 1841 0.54 B9:00 AM 1802 0.53 B 1781 0.52 B

10:00 AM 1806 0.53 B 1881 0.55 B11:00 AM 1876 0.55 B 1856 0.54 B12:00 PM 1865 0.54 B 1777 0.52 B

1:00 PM 1738 0.51 B 1888 0.55 B2:00 PM 1892 0.55 B 2116 0.62 B3:00 PM 2029 0.59 B 2058 0.60 B4:00 PM 2267 0.66 C 2359 0.69 C 2323 0.68 C5:00 PM 2502 0.73 C 2384 0.70 C 1855 0.54 B6:00 PM 2313 0.68 C 2360 0.69 C 1523 0.44 B7:00 PM 1882 0.55 B 1887 0.55 B

8:00 PM 1515 0.44 B 1530 0.45 B9:00 PM 1492 0.44 B 1485 0.43 B

10:00 PM 1264 0.37 A 1398 0.41 A11:00 PM 1046 0.31 A 1249 0.36 A12:00 AM 835 0.24 A 930 0.27 A

Total 15,116 35,614 26,294 0

Capacity LOS E

3,424

Reduction Factors100% Lane Widths to 12 Feet100% Side Clearance on Both Sides 90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade
I-94 WB East of I-194/M-66: Existing

Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday

Time 6/17/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 639 0.19 A 725 0.21 A

2:00 AM 476 0.14 A 510 0.15 A3:00 AM 512 0.15 A 501 0.15 A4:00 AM 489 0.14 A 492 0.14 A5:00 AM 530 0.15 A 510 0.15 A6:00 AM 672 0.20 A 655 0.19 A7:00 AM 1459 0.43 A 1485 0.43 B8:00 AM 2260 0.66 C 2106 0.62 B9:00 AM 2489 0.73 C 2402 0.70 C

10:00 AM 2415 0.71 C 2345 0.68 C11:00 AM 2399 0.70 C 2271 0.66 C12:00 PM 2290 0.67 C 2410 0.70 C

1:00 PM 2495 0.73 C 2505 0.73 C2:00 PM 2158 0.63 C 2158 0.63 C3:00 PM 2145 0.63 B 2145 0.63 B4:00 PM 2010 0.59 B 2300 0.67 C 2300 0.67 C5:00 PM 2180 0.64 C 2248 0.66 C 2248 0.66 C6:00 PM 2203 0.64 C 2385 0.70 C 2385 0.70 C7:00 PM 1749 0.51 B 2355 0.69 C

8:00 PM 1553 0.45 B 1935 0.57 B9:00 PM 1355 0.40 A 1523 0.44 B

10:00 PM 1216 0.36 A 1305 0.38 A11:00 PM 991 0.29 A 1120 0.33 A12:00 AM 794 0.23 A 902 0.26 A

Total 14,051 39,501 30,153 0

Capacity LOS E

3,424

Reduction Factors100% Lane Widths to 12 Feet100% Side Clearance on Both Sides 90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade
I-94 EB by Riverside Bridge

MOT: Maintain 2 Lanes Each Direction with Part-Width Construction

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 6/22/04 V/C LOS 6/23/04 V/C LOS 6/24/04 V/C LOS 6/25/04 V/C LOS 6/26/04 V/C LOS 6/27/04 V/C LOS 6/28/04 V/C LOS

1:00 AM 770 0.28 A 864 0.32 A 764 0.28 A 729 0.27 A 487 0.18 A 703 0.26 A2:00 AM 521 0.19 A 765 0.28 A 614 0.22 A 465 0.17 A 321 0.12 A 526 0.19 A3:00 AM 430 0.16 A 482 0.18 A 478 0.17 A 412 0.15 A 254 0.09 A 422 0.15 A4:00 AM 418 0.15 A 459 0.17 A 490 0.18 A 333 0.12 A 203 0.07 A 449 0.16 A5:00 AM 517 0.19 A 633 0.23 A 556 0.20 A 376 0.14 A 195 0.07 A 511 0.19 A6:00 AM 725 0.27 A 787 0.29 A 805 0.29 A 417 0.15 A 198 0.07 A 790 0.29 A7:00 AM 1,402 0.51 B 1,420 0.52 B 1,327 0.49 B 618 0.23 A 373 0.14 A 1,287 0.47 B8:00 AM 2,228 0.82 D 2,247 0.82 E 2,002 0.73 C 1,049 0.38 A 439 0.16 A 1,846 0.68 C9:00 AM 2,221 0.81 D 2,197 0.80 D 2,223 0.81 D 1,428 0.52 B 769 0.28 A 1,860 0.68 C

10:00 AM 2,109 0.77 D 2,192 0.80 D 2,110 0.77 D 1,628 0.60 B 1,156 0.42 A 1,792 0.66 C11:00 AM 2,002 0.73 C 2,072 0.76 C 2,252 0.82 E 1,962 0.72 C 1,453 0.53 B 1,803 0.66 C12:00 PM 2,075 0.76 C 1,992 0.73 C 2,222 0.81 D 2,047 0.75 C 1,754 0.64 C 1,833 0.67 C

1:00 PM 2,059 0.75 C 2,069 0.76 C 2,279 0.83 E 2,151 0.79 D 2,078 0.76 D 1,968 0.72 C2:00 PM 2,045 0.75 C 2,154 0.79 D 2,101 0.77 D 2,630 0.96 E 2,048 0.75 C 2,261 0.83 E 2,051 0.75 C3:00 PM 2,217 0.81 D 2,318 0.85 E 2,397 0.88 E 2,727 1.00 E 1,979 0.72 C 2,282 0.84 E 2,270 0.83 E4:00 PM 2,314 0.85 E 2,377 0.87 E 2,650 0.97 E 2,895 1.06 E 1,837 0.67 C 2,147 0.79 D 2,354 0.86 E5:00 PM 2,618 0.96 E 2,596 0.95 E 2,546 0.93 E 2,981 1.09 E 1,842 0.67 C 2,485 0.91 E 2,379 0.87 E6:00 PM 2,553 0.93 E 2,659 0.97 E 2,635 0.96 E 2,775 1.02 E 1,778 0.65 C 2,380 0.87 E7:00 PM 1,969 0.72 C 2,067 0.76 C 2,071 0.76 C 2,371 0.87 E 1,696 0.62 B 2,274 0.83 E8:00 PM 1,598 0.58 B 1,663 0.61 B 1,740 0.64 C 2,075 0.76 C 1,441 0.53 B 1,952 0.71 C9:00 PM 1,412 0.52 B 1,577 0.58 B 1,580 0.58 B 1,882 0.69 C 1,200 0.44 B 2,293 0.84 E

10:00 PM 1,321 0.48 B 1,273 0.47 B 1,375 0.50 B 1,572 0.58 B 1,102 0.40 A 1,771 0.65 C11:00 PM 1,101 0.40 A 1,170 0.43 A 1,200 0.44 B 1,293 0.47 B 944 0.35 A 1,357 0.50 B12:00 AM 929 0.34 A 1,211 0.44 B 1,060 0.39 A 1,034 0.38 A 720 0.26 A 1,105 0.40 A

Total 20,077 38,542 39,534 42,357 30,202 31,987 24,844

Capacity LOS E

2,732 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors95% Lane Widths to 11 Feet84% Side Clearance on Both Sides90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade
I-94 WB by Riverside Bridge

MOT: Maintain 2 Lanes Each Direction with Part-Width Construction

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 6/22/04 V/C LOS 6/23/04 V/C LOS 6/24/04 V/C LOS 6/25/04 V/C LOS 6/26/04 V/C LOS 6/27/04 V/C LOS 6/28/04 V/C LOS

1:00 AM 671 0.25 A 651 0.24 A 667 0.24 A 590 0.22 A 495 0.18 A 601 0.22 A2:00 AM 517 0.19 A 495 0.18 A 505 0.18 A 446 0.16 A 315 0.12 A 470 0.17 A3:00 AM 462 0.17 A 539 0.20 A 431 0.16 A 361 0.13 A 237 0.09 A 390 0.14 A4:00 AM 435 0.16 A 482 0.18 A 434 0.16 A 259 0.09 A 128 0.05 A 376 0.14 A5:00 AM 535 0.20 A 548 0.20 A 560 0.20 A 255 0.09 A 139 0.05 A 484 0.18 A6:00 AM 822 0.30 A 875 0.32 A 755 0.28 A 440 0.16 A 188 0.07 A 732 0.27 A7:00 AM 1,506 0.55 B 1,567 0.57 B 1,461 0.53 B 742 0.27 A 337 0.12 A 1,443 0.53 B8:00 AM 2,114 0.77 D 2,097 0.77 D 1,942 0.71 C 1,148 0.42 A 461 0.17 A 1,929 0.71 C9:00 AM 1,997 0.73 C 2,048 0.75 C 2,044 0.75 C 1,458 0.53 B 817 0.30 A 1,784 0.65 C

10:00 AM 2,069 0.76 C 2,097 0.77 D 2,109 0.77 D 1,874 0.69 C 1,180 0.43 B 1,861 0.68 C11:00 AM 1,985 0.73 C 2,255 0.83 E 2,336 0.85 E 2,113 0.77 D 1,541 0.56 B 2,087 0.76 D12:00 PM 2,189 0.80 D 2,228 0.82 D 2,417 0.88 E 2,162 0.79 D 1,897 0.69 C 2,236 0.82 D

1:00 PM 2,144 0.78 D 2,208 0.81 D 2,608 0.95 E 1,991 0.73 C 2,116 0.77 D 2,289 0.84 E2:00 PM 2,326 0.85 E 2,248 0.82 E 2,361 0.86 E 2,703 0.99 E 2,048 0.75 C 2,116 0.77 D 2,298 0.84 E3:00 PM 2,196 0.80 D 2,343 0.86 E 2,331 0.85 E 3,086 1.13 E 1,962 0.72 C 2,182 0.80 D 2,256 0.83 E4:00 PM 2,449 0.90 E 2,497 0.91 E 2,553 0.93 E 3,090 1.13 E 1,990 0.73 C 2,204 0.81 D 2,322 0.85 E5:00 PM 2,542 0.93 E 2,496 0.91 E 2,976 1.09 E 3,020 1.11 E 1,811 0.66 C 2,184 0.80 D 2,418 0.89 E6:00 PM 2,701 0.99 E 2,520 0.92 E 2,943 1.08 E 2,879 1.05 E 1,748 0.64 C 2,230 0.82 D7:00 PM 1,939 0.71 C 2,165 0.79 D 2,176 0.80 D 2,585 0.95 E 1,642 0.60 B 2,133 0.78 D8:00 PM 1,765 0.65 C 1,677 0.61 B 1,910 0.70 C 2,272 0.83 E 1,372 0.50 B 2,090 0.76 D9:00 PM 1,536 0.56 B 1,667 0.61 B 1,692 0.62 B 1,985 0.73 C 1,201 0.44 B 1,855 0.68 C

10:00 PM 1,271 0.47 B 1,436 0.53 B 1,493 0.55 B 1,662 0.61 B 1,103 0.40 A 1,600 0.59 B11:00 PM 1,184 0.43 B 1,153 0.42 A 1,186 0.43 B 1,248 0.46 B 925 0.34 A 1,235 0.45 B12:00 AM 969 0.35 A 934 0.34 A 948 0.35 A 947 0.35 A 689 0.25 A 920 0.34 A

Total 20,878 38,582 40,659 43,746 30,330 30,600 25,976

Capacity LOS E

2,732 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors95% Lane Widths to 11 Feet84% Side Clearance on Both Sides90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade
I-94 WB East of I-194/M-66

MOT: Maintain 2 Lanes Each Direction with Part-Width Construction

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time V/C LOS V/C LOS 6/17/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 639 0.23 A 725 0.27 A

2:00 AM 476 0.17 A 510 0.19 A3:00 AM 512 0.19 A 501 0.18 A4:00 AM 489 0.18 A 492 0.18 A5:00 AM 530 0.19 A 510 0.19 A6:00 AM 672 0.25 A 655 0.24 A7:00 AM 1459 0.53 B 1485 0.54 B8:00 AM 2260 0.83 E 2106 0.77 D9:00 AM 2489 0.91 E 2402 0.88 E

10:00 AM 2415 0.88 E 2345 0.86 E11:00 AM 2399 0.88 E 2271 0.83 E12:00 PM 2290 0.84 E 2410 0.88 E

1:00 PM 2495 0.91 E 2505 0.92 E2:00 PM 2158 0.79 D 2158 0.79 D3:00 PM 2145 0.79 D 2145 0.79 D4:00 PM 2010 0.74 C 2300 0.84 E 2300 0.84 E5:00 PM 2180 0.80 D 2248 0.82 E 2248 0.82 E6:00 PM 2203 0.81 D 2385 0.87 E 2385 0.87 E7:00 PM 1749 0.64 C 2355 0.86 E

8:00 PM 1553 0.57 B 1935 0.71 C9:00 PM 1355 0.50 B 1523 0.56 B

10:00 PM 1216 0.45 B 1305 0.48 B11:00 PM 991 0.36 A 1120 0.41 A12:00 AM 794 0.29 A 902 0.33 A

Total 0 0 14,051 39,501 30,153 0 0

Capacity LOS E

2,732 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors95% Lane Widths to 11 Feet84% Side Clearance on Both Sides90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade
I-94 EB East of I-194/M-66

MOT: Maintain 2 Lanes Each Direction with Part-Width Construction

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time V/C LOS V/C LOS 6/17/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS 6/19/04 V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 830 0.30 A 833 0.30 A

2:00 AM 560 0.20 A 661 0.24 A3:00 AM 494 0.18 A 540 0.20 A4:00 AM 547 0.20 A 507 0.19 A5:00 AM 662 0.24 A 676 0.25 A6:00 AM 885 0.32 A 855 0.31 A7:00 AM 1317 0.48 B 1323 0.48 B8:00 AM 1729 0.63 C 1841 0.67 C9:00 AM 1802 0.66 C 1781 0.65 C

10:00 AM 1806 0.66 C 1881 0.69 C11:00 AM 1876 0.69 C 1856 0.68 C12:00 PM 1865 0.68 C 1777 0.65 C

1:00 PM 1738 0.64 C 1888 0.69 C2:00 PM 1892 0.69 C 2116 0.77 D3:00 PM 2029 0.74 C 2058 0.75 C4:00 PM 2267 0.83 E 2359 0.86 E 2323 0.85 E5:00 PM 2502 0.92 E 2384 0.87 E 1855 0.68 C6:00 PM 2313 0.85 E 2360 0.86 E 1523 0.56 B7:00 PM 1882 0.69 C 1887 0.69 C

8:00 PM 1515 0.55 B 1530 0.56 B9:00 PM 1492 0.55 B 1485 0.54 B

10:00 PM 1264 0.46 B 1398 0.51 B11:00 PM 1046 0.38 A 1249 0.46 B12:00 AM 835 0.31 A 930 0.34 A

Total 0 0 15,116 35,614 26,294 0 0

Capacity LOS E

2,732 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors95% Lane Widths to 11 Feet84% Side Clearance on Both Sides90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade
Average I-94 EB LOS

Time V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C

1:00 AM 0.28 0.32 0.28 0.27 0.18 0.26 0.30 0.302:00 AM 0.19 0.28 0.22 0.17 0.12 0.19 0.20 0.243:00 AM 0.16 0.18 0.17 0.15 0.09 0.15 0.18 0.204:00 AM 0.15 0.17 0.18 0.12 0.07 0.16 0.20 0.195:00 AM 0.19 0.23 0.20 0.14 0.07 0.19 0.24 0.256:00 AM 0.27 0.29 0.29 0.15 0.07 0.29 0.32 0.317:00 AM 0.51 0.52 0.49 0.23 0.14 0.47 0.48 0.488:00 AM 0.82 0.82 0.73 0.38 0.16 0.68 0.63 0.679:00 AM 0.81 0.80 0.81 0.52 0.28 0.68 0.66 0.65

10:00 AM 0.77 0.80 0.77 0.60 0.42 0.66 0.66 0.6911:00 AM 0.73 0.76 0.82 0.72 0.53 0.66 0.69 0.6812:00 PM 0.76 0.73 0.81 0.75 0.64 0.67 0.68 0.65

1:00 PM 0.75 0.76 0.83 0.79 0.76 0.72 0.64 0.692:00 PM 0.75 0.79 0.77 0.96 0.75 0.83 0.75 0.69 0.773:00 PM 0.81 0.85 0.88 1.00 0.72 0.84 0.83 0.74 0.754:00 PM 0.85 0.87 0.97 1.06 0.67 0.79 0.86 0.83 0.86 0.855:00 PM 0.96 0.95 0.93 1.09 0.67 0.91 0.87 0.92 0.87 0.686:00 PM 0.93 0.97 0.96 1.02 0.65 0.87 0.85 0.86 0.567:00 PM 0.72 0.76 0.76 0.87 0.62 0.83 0.69 0.698:00 PM 0.58 0.61 0.64 0.76 0.53 0.71 0.55 0.569:00 PM 0.52 0.58 0.58 0.69 0.44 0.84 0.55 0.54

10:00 PM 0.48 0.47 0.50 0.58 0.40 0.65 0.46 0.5111:00 PM 0.40 0.43 0.44 0.47 0.35 0.50 0.38 0.4612:00 AM 0.34 0.44 0.39 0.38 0.26 0.40 0.31 0.34

Total 7.35 14.11 14.47 15.50 11.05 11.71 9.09 5.53 13.03 9.62

Avg 0.67 0.59 0.60 0.65 0.46 0.49 0.53 0.61 0.54 0.53

Overall Avg V/C 0.56 =B
Average I-94 WB LOS

Time V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C

1:00 AM 0.25 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.22 0.23 0.272:00 AM 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.193:00 AM 0.17 0.20 0.16 0.13 0.09 0.14 0.19 0.184:00 AM 0.16 0.18 0.16 0.09 0.05 0.14 0.18 0.185:00 AM 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.09 0.05 0.18 0.19 0.196:00 AM 0.30 0.32 0.28 0.16 0.07 0.27 0.25 0.247:00 AM 0.55 0.57 0.53 0.27 0.12 0.53 0.53 0.548:00 AM 0.77 0.77 0.71 0.42 0.17 0.71 0.83 0.779:00 AM 0.73 0.75 0.75 0.53 0.30 0.65 0.91 0.88

10:00 AM 0.76 0.77 0.77 0.69 0.43 0.68 0.88 0.8611:00 AM 0.73 0.83 0.85 0.77 0.56 0.76 0.88 0.8312:00 PM 0.80 0.82 0.88 0.79 0.69 0.82 0.84 0.88

1:00 PM 0.78 0.81 0.95 0.73 0.77 0.84 0.91 0.922:00 PM 0.85 0.82 0.86 0.99 0.75 0.77 0.84 0.79 0.793:00 PM 0.80 0.86 0.85 1.13 0.72 0.80 0.83 0.79 0.794:00 PM 0.90 0.91 0.93 1.13 0.73 0.81 0.85 0.74 0.84 0.845:00 PM 0.93 0.91 1.09 1.11 0.66 0.80 0.89 0.80 0.82 0.826:00 PM 0.99 0.92 1.08 1.05 0.64 0.82 0.81 0.87 0.877:00 PM 0.71 0.79 0.80 0.95 0.60 0.78 0.64 0.868:00 PM 0.65 0.61 0.70 0.83 0.50 0.76 0.57 0.719:00 PM 0.56 0.61 0.62 0.73 0.44 0.68 0.50 0.56

10:00 PM 0.47 0.53 0.55 0.61 0.40 0.59 0.45 0.4811:00 PM 0.43 0.42 0.43 0.46 0.34 0.45 0.36 0.4112:00 AM 0.35 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.25 0.34 0.29 0.33

Total 7.64 14.12 14.88 16.01 11.10 11.20 9.51 5.14 14.46 11.04

Avg 0.69 0.59 0.62 0.67 0.46 0.47 0.56 0.57 0.60 0.61

Overall Avg V/C 0.578 =B
I-94 WB by Riverside Bridge:Existing

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 6/22/04 V/C LOS 6/23/04 V/C LOS 6/24/04 V/C LOS 6/25/04 V/C LOS 6/26/04 V/C LOS 6/27/04 V/C LOS 6/28/04 V/C LOS

1:00 AM 671 0.20 A 651 0.19 A 667 0.19 A 590 0.17 A 495 0.14 A 601 0.18 A2:00 AM 517 0.15 A 495 0.14 A 505 0.15 A 446 0.13 A 315 0.09 A 470 0.14 A3:00 AM 462 0.13 A 539 0.16 A 431 0.13 A 361 0.11 A 237 0.07 A 390 0.11 A4:00 AM 435 0.13 A 482 0.14 A 434 0.13 A 259 0.08 A 128 0.04 A 376 0.11 A5:00 AM 535 0.16 A 548 0.16 A 560 0.16 A 255 0.07 A 139 0.04 A 484 0.14 A6:00 AM 822 0.24 A 875 0.26 A 755 0.22 A 440 0.13 A 188 0.05 A 732 0.21 A7:00 AM 1,506 0.44 B 1,567 0.46 B 1,461 0.43 A 742 0.22 A 337 0.10 A 1,443 0.42 A8:00 AM 2,114 0.62 B 2,097 0.61 B 1,942 0.57 B 1,148 0.34 A 461 0.13 A 1,929 0.56 B9:00 AM 1,997 0.58 B 2,048 0.60 B 2,044 0.60 B 1,458 0.43 A 817 0.24 A 1,784 0.52 B

10:00 AM 2,069 0.60 B 2,097 0.61 B 2,109 0.62 B 1,874 0.55 B 1,180 0.34 A 1,861 0.54 B11:00 AM 1,985 0.58 B 2,255 0.66 C 2,336 0.68 C 2,113 0.62 B 1,541 0.45 B 2,087 0.61 B12:00 PM 2,189 0.64 C 2,228 0.65 C 2,417 0.71 C 2,162 0.63 C 1,897 0.55 B 2,236 0.65 C

1:00 PM 2,144 0.63 B 2,208 0.64 C 2,608 0.76 D 1,991 0.58 B 2,116 0.62 B 2,289 0.67 C2:00 PM 2,326 0.68 C 2,248 0.66 C 2,361 0.69 C 2,703 0.79 D 2,048 0.60 B 2,116 0.62 B 2,298 0.67 C3:00 PM 2,196 0.64 C 2,343 0.68 C 2,331 0.68 C 3,086 0.90 E 1,962 0.57 B 2,182 0.64 C 2,256 0.66 C4:00 PM 2,449 0.72 C 2,497 0.73 C 2,553 0.75 C 3,090 0.90 E 1,990 0.58 B 2,204 0.64 C 2,322 0.68 C5:00 PM 2,542 0.74 C 2,496 0.73 C 2,976 0.87 E 3,020 0.88 E 1,811 0.53 B 2,184 0.64 C 2,418 0.71 C6:00 PM 2,701 0.79 D 2,520 0.74 C 2,943 0.86 E 2,879 0.84 E 1,748 0.51 B 2,230 0.65 C7:00 PM 1,939 0.57 B 2,165 0.63 C 2,176 0.64 C 2,585 0.76 C 1,642 0.48 B 2,133 0.62 B8:00 PM 1,765 0.52 B 1,677 0.49 B 1,910 0.56 B 2,272 0.66 C 1,372 0.40 A 2,090 0.61 B9:00 PM 1,536 0.45 B 1,667 0.49 B 1,692 0.49 B 1,985 0.58 B 1,201 0.35 A 1,855 0.54 B

10:00 PM 1,271 0.37 A 1,436 0.42 A 1,493 0.44 B 1,662 0.49 B 1,103 0.32 A 1,600 0.47 B11:00 PM 1,184 0.35 A 1,153 0.34 A 1,186 0.35 A 1,248 0.36 A 925 0.27 A 1,235 0.36 A12:00 AM 969 0.28 A 934 0.27 A 948 0.28 A 947 0.28 A 689 0.20 A 920 0.27 A

Total 20,878 38,582 40,659 43,746 30,330 30,600 25,976

Capacity LOS E

3,424 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors100% Lane Widths to 12 Feet100% Side Clearance No Side Restrictions90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
I-94 EB by Riverside Bridge: Existing

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 6/22/04 V/C LOS 6/23/04 V/C LOS 6/24/04 V/C LOS 6/25/04 V/C LOS 6/26/04 V/C LOS 6/27/04 V/C LOS 6/28/04 V/C LOS

1:00 AM 770 0.22 A 864 0.25 A 764 0.22 A 729 0.21 A 487 0.14 A 703 0.21 A2:00 AM 521 0.15 A 765 0.22 A 614 0.18 A 465 0.14 A 321 0.09 A 526 0.15 A3:00 AM 430 0.13 A 482 0.14 A 478 0.14 A 412 0.12 A 254 0.07 A 422 0.12 A4:00 AM 418 0.12 A 459 0.13 A 490 0.14 A 333 0.10 A 203 0.06 A 449 0.13 A5:00 AM 517 0.15 A 633 0.18 A 556 0.16 A 376 0.11 A 195 0.06 A 511 0.15 A6:00 AM 725 0.21 A 787 0.23 A 805 0.24 A 417 0.12 A 198 0.06 A 790 0.23 A7:00 AM 1,402 0.41 A 1,420 0.41 A 1,327 0.39 A 618 0.18 A 373 0.11 A 1,287 0.38 A8:00 AM 2,228 0.65 C 2,247 0.66 C 2,002 0.58 B 1,049 0.31 A 439 0.13 A 1,846 0.54 B9:00 AM 2,221 0.65 C 2,197 0.64 C 2,223 0.65 C 1,428 0.42 A 769 0.22 A 1,860 0.54 B

10:00 AM 2,109 0.62 B 2,192 0.64 C 2,110 0.62 B 1,628 0.48 B 1,156 0.34 A 1,792 0.52 B11:00 AM 2,002 0.58 B 2,072 0.61 B 2,252 0.66 C 1,962 0.57 B 1,453 0.42 A 1,803 0.53 B12:00 PM 2,075 0.61 B 1,992 0.58 B 2,222 0.65 C 2,047 0.60 B 1,754 0.51 B 1,833 0.54 B

1:00 PM 2,059 0.60 B 2,069 0.60 B 2,279 0.67 C 2,151 0.63 B 2,078 0.61 B 1,968 0.57 B2:00 PM 2,045 0.60 B 2,154 0.63 B 2,101 0.61 B 2,630 0.77 D 2,048 0.60 B 2,261 0.66 C 2,051 0.60 B3:00 PM 2,217 0.65 C 2,318 0.68 C 2,397 0.70 C 2,727 0.80 D 1,979 0.58 B 2,282 0.67 C 2,270 0.66 C4:00 PM 2,314 0.68 C 2,377 0.69 C 2,650 0.77 D 2,895 0.85 E 1,837 0.54 B 2,147 0.63 B 2,354 0.69 C5:00 PM 2,618 0.76 D 2,596 0.76 C 2,546 0.74 C 2,981 0.87 E 1,842 0.54 B 2,485 0.73 C 2,379 0.69 C6:00 PM 2,553 0.75 C 2,659 0.78 D 2,635 0.77 D 2,775 0.81 D 1,778 0.52 B 2,380 0.70 C7:00 PM 1,969 0.58 B 2,067 0.60 B 2,071 0.60 B 2,371 0.69 C 1,696 0.50 B 2,274 0.66 C8:00 PM 1,598 0.47 B 1,663 0.49 B 1,740 0.51 B 2,075 0.61 B 1,441 0.42 A 1,952 0.57 B9:00 PM 1,412 0.41 A 1,577 0.46 B 1,580 0.46 B 1,882 0.55 B 1,200 0.35 A 2,293 0.67 C

10:00 PM 1,321 0.39 A 1,273 0.37 A 1,375 0.40 A 1,572 0.46 B 1,102 0.32 A 1,771 0.52 B11:00 PM 1,101 0.32 A 1,170 0.34 A 1,200 0.35 A 1,293 0.38 A 944 0.28 A 1,357 0.40 A12:00 AM 929 0.27 A 1,211 0.35 A 1,060 0.31 A 1,034 0.30 A 720 0.21 A 1,105 0.32 A

Total 20,077 38,542 39,534 42,357 30,202 31,987 24,844

Capacity LOS E

3,424 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors100% Lane Widths to 12 Feet100% Side Clearance No Side Restrictions90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
I-94 WB East of I-194/M-66:Existing

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 7/23/02 V/C LOS 7/24/02 V/C LOS 7/25/02 V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 678 0.20 A 690 0.20 A

2:00 AM 476 0.14 A 481 0.14 A3:00 AM 422 0.12 A 444 0.13 A4:00 AM 475 0.14 A 508 0.15 A5:00 AM 483 0.14 A 540 0.16 A6:00 AM 690 0.20 A 751 0.22 A7:00 AM 1287 0.38 A 1344 0.39 A8:00 AM 1914 0.56 B 1751 0.51 B9:00 AM 1886 0.55 B 1913 0.56 B

10:00 AM 1979 0.58 B 2049 0.60 B11:00 AM 2067 0.60 B 2006 0.59 B 2133 0.62 B12:00 PM 2088 0.61 B 2185 0.64 C 2325 0.68 C

1:00 PM 2060 0.60 B 2136 0.62 B

2:00 PM 2055 0.60 B 2198 0.64 C3:00 PM 2212 0.65 C 2287 0.67 C4:00 PM 2405 0.70 C 2339 0.68 C5:00 PM 2350 0.69 C 2567 0.75 C6:00 PM 2389 0.70 C 2538 0.74 C7:00 PM 1810 0.53 B 1950 0.57 B8:00 PM 1492 0.44 B 1673 0.49 B9:00 PM 1280 0.37 A 1466 0.43 A

10:00 PM 1350 0.39 A 1358 0.40 A11:00 PM 1043 0.30 A 1161 0.34 A12:00 AM 887 0.26 A 900 0.26 A

Total 19,273 37,054 14,929 0 0 0 0

Capacity LOS E

3,424 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors100% Lane Widths to 12 Feet100% Side Clearance No Side Restrictions90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
I-94 EB East of I-194/M-66: Existing

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 7/23/02 V/C LOS 7/24/02 V/C LOS 7/25/02 V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 717 0.21 A 741 0.22 A

2:00 AM 577 0.17 A 607 0.18 A3:00 AM 484 0.14 A 603 0.18 A4:00 AM 553 0.16 A 541 0.16 A5:00 AM 604 0.18 A 701 0.20 A6:00 AM 797 0.23 A 876 0.26 A7:00 AM 1333 0.39 A 1330 0.39 A8:00 AM 1679 0.49 B 1816 0.53 B9:00 AM 1750 0.51 B 1857 0.54 B

10:00 AM 1809 0.53 B 1810 0.53 B11:00 AM 1733 0.51 B 1927 0.56 B 2091 0.61 B12:00 PM 1855 0.54 B 1971 0.58 B 2014 0.59 B

1:00 PM 1889 0.55 B 1956 0.57 B

2:00 PM 1989 0.58 B 2116 0.62 B3:00 PM 2121 0.62 B 2202 0.64 C4:00 PM 2352 0.69 C 2444 0.71 C5:00 PM 2453 0.72 C 2581 0.75 C6:00 PM 2241 0.65 C 2433 0.71 C7:00 PM 1882 0.55 B 2039 0.60 B8:00 PM 1509 0.44 B 1655 0.48 B9:00 PM 1441 0.42 A 1491 0.44 B

10:00 PM 1360 0.40 A 1334 0.39 A11:00 PM 1134 0.33 A 1160 0.34 A12:00 AM 916 0.27 A 1085 0.32 A

Total 17,409 36,697 14,987 0 0 0 0

Capacity LOS E

3,424 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors100% Lane Widths to 12 Feet100% Side Clearance No Side Restrictions90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
I-94 EB East of I-194/M-66: Existing

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time V/C LOS V/C LOS 6/17/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS 6/19/04 V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 830 0.24 A 833 0.24 A

2:00 AM 560 0.16 A 661 0.19 A3:00 AM 494 0.14 A 540 0.16 A4:00 AM 547 0.16 A 507 0.15 A5:00 AM 662 0.19 A 676 0.20 A6:00 AM 885 0.26 A 855 0.25 A7:00 AM 1317 0.38 A 1323 0.39 A8:00 AM 1729 0.50 B 1841 0.54 B9:00 AM 1802 0.53 B 1781 0.52 B

10:00 AM 1806 0.53 B 1881 0.55 B11:00 AM 1876 0.55 B 1856 0.54 B12:00 PM 1865 0.54 B 1777 0.52 B

1:00 PM 1738 0.51 B 1888 0.55 B2:00 PM 1892 0.55 B 2116 0.62 B3:00 PM 2029 0.59 B 2058 0.60 B4:00 PM 2267 0.66 C 2359 0.69 C 2323 0.68 C5:00 PM 2502 0.73 C 2384 0.70 C 1855 0.54 B6:00 PM 2313 0.68 C 2360 0.69 C 1523 0.44 B7:00 PM 1882 0.55 B 1887 0.55 B

8:00 PM 1515 0.44 B 1530 0.45 B9:00 PM 1492 0.44 B 1485 0.43 B

10:00 PM 1264 0.37 A 1398 0.41 A11:00 PM 1046 0.31 A 1249 0.36 A12:00 AM 835 0.24 A 930 0.27 A

Total 0 0 15,116 35,614 26,294 0 0

Capacity LOS E

3,424 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors100% Lane Widths to 12 Feet100% Side Clearance No Side Restrictions90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
I-94 WB East of I-194/M-66: Existing

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time V/C LOS V/C LOS 6/17/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 639 0.19 A 725 0.21 A

2:00 AM 476 0.14 A 510 0.15 A3:00 AM 512 0.15 A 501 0.15 A4:00 AM 489 0.14 A 492 0.14 A5:00 AM 530 0.15 A 510 0.15 A6:00 AM 0.00 A 672 0.20 A 655 0.19 A7:00 AM 0.00 A 1459 0.43 A 1485 0.43 B8:00 AM 0.00 A 2260 0.66 C 2106 0.62 B9:00 AM 0.00 A 2489 0.73 C 2402 0.70 C

10:00 AM 0.00 A 2415 0.71 C 2345 0.68 C11:00 AM 0.00 A 2399 0.70 C 2271 0.66 C12:00 PM 0.00 A 2290 0.67 C 2410 0.70 C

1:00 PM 0.00 A 2495 0.73 C 2505 0.73 C2:00 PM 0.00 A 2158 0.63 C 2158 0.63 C3:00 PM 0.00 A 2145 0.63 B 2145 0.63 B4:00 PM 2010 0.59 B 2300 0.67 C 2300 0.67 C5:00 PM 2180 0.64 C 2248 0.66 C 2248 0.66 C6:00 PM 2203 0.64 C 2385 0.70 C 2385 0.70 C7:00 PM 1749 0.51 B 2355 0.69 C

8:00 PM 1553 0.45 B 1935 0.57 B9:00 PM 1355 0.40 A 1523 0.44 B

10:00 PM 1216 0.36 A 1305 0.38 A11:00 PM 991 0.29 A 1120 0.33 A12:00 AM 794 0.23 A 902 0.26 A

Total 0 0 14,051 39,501 30,153 0 0

Capacity LOS E

3,424 Veh/hr for 2 lanes

Reduction Factors100% Lane Widths to 12 Feet100% Side Clearance No Side Restrictions90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
I-94 EB by Riverside Bridge

MOT: Maintain 1 Lanes Each Direction During Non-Restricted Hours (Paving Only Sun -Thur Nights)

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 6/22/04 V/C LOS 6/23/04 V/C LOS 6/24/04 V/C LOS 6/25/04 V/C LOS 6/26/04 V/C LOS 6/27/04 V/C LOS 6/28/04 V/C LOS

1:00 AM 770 0.56 B 864 0.62 B 764 0.55 B 729 0.53 B 487 0.35 A 703 0.51 B2:00 AM 521 0.38 A 765 0.55 B 614 0.44 B 465 0.34 A 321 0.23 A 526 0.38 A3:00 AM 430 0.31 A 482 0.35 A 478 0.34 A 412 0.30 A 254 0.18 A 422 0.30 A4:00 AM 418 0.30 A 459 0.33 A 490 0.35 A 333 0.24 A 203 0.15 A 449 0.32 A5:00 AM 517 0.37 A 633 0.46 B 556 0.40 A 376 0.27 A 195 0.14 A 511 0.37 A6:00 AM 725 0.52 B 787 0.57 B 805 0.58 B 417 0.30 A 198 0.14 A 790 0.57 B7:00 AM 1,402 1.01 E 1,420 1.02 E 1,327 0.96 E 618 0.45 B 373 0.27 A 1,287 0.93 E8:00 AM 2,228 1.61 E 2,247 1.62 E 2,002 1.44 E 1,049 0.76 C 439 0.32 A 1,846 1.33 E9:00 AM 2,221 1.60 E 2,197 1.58 E 2,223 1.60 E 1,428 1.03 E 769 0.55 B 1,860 1.34 E

10:00 AM 2,109 1.52 E 2,192 1.58 E 2,110 1.52 E 1,628 1.17 E 1,156 0.83 E 1,792 1.29 E11:00 AM 2,002 1.44 E 2,072 1.49 E 2,252 1.62 E 1,962 1.41 E 1,453 1.05 E 1,803 1.30 E12:00 PM 2,075 1.50 E 1,992 1.44 E 2,222 1.60 E 2,047 1.48 E 1,754 1.26 E 1,833 1.32 E

1:00 PM 2,059 1.48 E 2,069 1.49 E 2,279 1.64 E 2,151 1.55 E 2,078 1.50 E 1,968 1.42 E2:00 PM 2,045 1.47 E 2,154 1.55 E 2,101 1.52 E 2,630 1.90 E 2,048 1.48 E 2,261 1.63 E 2,051 1.48 E3:00 PM 2,217 1.60 E 2,318 1.67 E 2,397 1.73 E 2,727 1.97 E 1,979 1.43 E 2,282 1.65 E 2,270 1.64 E4:00 PM 2,314 1.67 E 2,377 1.71 E 2,650 1.91 E 2,895 2.09 E 1,837 1.32 E 2,147 1.55 E 2,354 1.70 E5:00 PM 2,618 1.89 E 2,596 1.87 E 2,546 1.84 E 2,981 2.15 E 1,842 1.33 E 2,485 1.79 E 2,379 1.72 E6:00 PM 2,553 1.84 E 2,659 1.92 E 2,635 1.90 E 2,775 2.00 E 1,778 1.28 E 2,380 1.72 E7:00 PM 1,969 1.42 E 2,067 1.49 E 2,071 1.49 E 2,371 1.71 E 1,696 1.22 E 2,274 1.64 E8:00 PM 1,598 1.15 E 1,663 1.20 E 1,740 1.25 E 2,075 1.50 E 1,441 1.04 E 1,952 1.41 E9:00 PM 1,412 1.02 E 1,577 1.14 E 1,580 1.14 E 1,882 1.36 E 1,200 0.87 E 2,293 1.65 E

10:00 PM 1,321 0.95 E 1,273 0.92 E 1,375 0.99 E 1,572 1.13 E 1,102 0.79 D 1,771 1.28 E11:00 PM 1,101 0.79 D 1,170 0.84 E 1,200 0.87 E 1,293 0.93 E 944 0.68 C 1,357 0.98 E12:00 AM 929 0.67 C 1,211 0.87 E 1,060 0.76 D 1,034 0.75 C 720 0.52 B 1,105 0.80 D

Total 20,077 38,542 39,534 42,357 30,202 31,987 24,844

Capacity LOS E

1,387 Veh/hr for 1 lanes

Reduction Factors90% Lane Widths to 10 Feet90% Side Clearance on One Side90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
I-94 WB by Riverside Bridge

MOT: Maintain 1 Lanes Each Direction During Non-Restricted Hours (Paving Only Sun -Thur Nights)

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 6/22/04 V/C LOS 6/23/04 V/C LOS 6/24/04 V/C LOS 6/25/04 V/C LOS 6/26/04 V/C LOS 6/27/04 V/C LOS 6/28/04 V/C LOS

1:00 AM 671 0.48 B 651 0.47 B 667 0.48 B 590 0.43 A 495 0.36 A 601 0.43 B2:00 AM 517 0.37 A 495 0.36 A 505 0.36 A 446 0.32 A 315 0.23 A 470 0.34 A3:00 AM 462 0.33 A 539 0.39 A 431 0.31 A 361 0.26 A 237 0.17 A 390 0.28 A4:00 AM 435 0.31 A 482 0.35 A 434 0.31 A 259 0.19 A 128 0.09 A 376 0.27 A5:00 AM 535 0.39 A 548 0.40 A 560 0.40 A 255 0.18 A 139 0.10 A 484 0.35 A6:00 AM 822 0.59 B 875 0.63 C 755 0.54 B 440 0.32 A 188 0.14 A 732 0.53 B7:00 AM 1,506 1.09 E 1,567 1.13 E 1,461 1.05 E 742 0.54 B 337 0.24 A 1,443 1.04 E8:00 AM 2,114 1.52 E 2,097 1.51 E 1,942 1.40 E 1,148 0.83 E 461 0.33 A 1,929 1.39 E9:00 AM 1,997 1.44 E 2,048 1.48 E 2,044 1.47 E 1,458 1.05 E 817 0.59 B 1,784 1.29 E

10:00 AM 2,069 1.49 E 2,097 1.51 E 2,109 1.52 E 1,874 1.35 E 1,180 0.85 E 1,861 1.34 E11:00 AM 1,985 1.43 E 2,255 1.63 E 2,336 1.68 E 2,113 1.52 E 1,541 1.11 E 2,087 1.51 E12:00 PM 2,189 1.58 E 2,228 1.61 E 2,417 1.74 E 2,162 1.56 E 1,897 1.37 E 2,236 1.61 E

1:00 PM 2,144 1.55 E 2,208 1.59 E 2,608 1.88 E 1,991 1.44 E 2,116 1.53 E 2,289 1.65 E2:00 PM 2,326 1.68 E 2,248 1.62 E 2,361 1.70 E 2,703 1.95 E 2,048 1.48 E 2,116 1.53 E 2,298 1.66 E3:00 PM 2,196 1.58 E 2,343 1.69 E 2,331 1.68 E 3,086 2.23 E 1,962 1.41 E 2,182 1.57 E 2,256 1.63 E4:00 PM 2,449 1.77 E 2,497 1.80 E 2,553 1.84 E 3,090 2.23 E 1,990 1.44 E 2,204 1.59 E 2,322 1.67 E5:00 PM 2,542 1.83 E 2,496 1.80 E 2,976 2.15 E 3,020 2.18 E 1,811 1.31 E 2,184 1.58 E 2,418 1.74 E6:00 PM 2,701 1.95 E 2,520 1.82 E 2,943 2.12 E 2,879 2.08 E 1,748 1.26 E 2,230 1.61 E7:00 PM 1,939 1.40 E 2,165 1.56 E 2,176 1.57 E 2,585 1.86 E 1,642 1.18 E 2,133 1.54 E8:00 PM 1,765 1.27 E 1,677 1.21 E 1,910 1.38 E 2,272 1.64 E 1,372 0.99 E 2,090 1.51 E9:00 PM 1,536 1.11 E 1,667 1.20 E 1,692 1.22 E 1,985 1.43 E 1,201 0.87 E 1,855 1.34 E

10:00 PM 1,271 0.92 E 1,436 1.04 E 1,493 1.08 E 1,662 1.20 E 1,103 0.80 D 1,600 1.15 E11:00 PM 1,184 0.85 E 1,153 0.83 E 1,186 0.86 E 1,248 0.90 E 925 0.67 C 1,235 0.89 E12:00 AM 969 0.70 C 934 0.67 C 948 0.68 C 947 0.68 C 689 0.50 B 920 0.66 C

Total 20,878 38,582 40,659 43,746 30,330 30,600 25,976

Capacity LOS E

1,387 Veh/hr for 1 lanes

Reduction Factors90% Lane Widths to 10 Feet90% Side Clearance on One Side90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
I-94 WB East of I-194/M-66

MOT: Maintain 1 Lanes Each Direction During Non-Restricted Hours (Paving Only Sun -Thur Nights)

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time V/C LOS V/C LOS 6/17/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 639 0.46 B 725 0.52 B

2:00 AM 476 0.34 A 510 0.37 A3:00 AM 512 0.37 A 501 0.36 A4:00 AM 489 0.35 A 492 0.35 A5:00 AM 530 0.38 A 510 0.37 A6:00 AM 0.00 A 672 0.48 B 655 0.47 B7:00 AM 0.00 A 1459 1.05 E 1485 1.07 E8:00 AM 0.00 A 2260 1.63 E 2106 1.52 E9:00 AM 0.00 A 2489 1.79 E 2402 1.73 E

10:00 AM 0.00 A 2415 1.74 E 2345 1.69 E11:00 AM 0.00 A 2399 1.73 E 2271 1.64 E12:00 PM 0.00 A 2290 1.65 E 2410 1.74 E

1:00 PM 0.00 A 2495 1.80 E 2505 1.81 E2:00 PM 0.00 A 2158 1.56 E 2158 1.56 E3:00 PM 0.00 A 2145 1.55 E 2145 1.55 E4:00 PM 2010 1.45 E 2300 1.66 E 2300 1.66 E5:00 PM 2180 1.57 E 2248 1.62 E 2248 1.62 E6:00 PM 2203 1.59 E 2385 1.72 E 2385 1.72 E7:00 PM 1749 1.26 E 2355 1.70 E

8:00 PM 1553 1.12 E 1935 1.40 E9:00 PM 1355 0.98 E 1523 1.10 E

10:00 PM 1216 0.88 E 1305 0.94 E11:00 PM 991 0.71 C 1120 0.81 D12:00 AM 794 0.57 B 902 0.65 C

Total 0 0 14,051 39,501 30,153 0 0

Capacity LOS E

1,387 Veh/hr for 1 lanes

Reduction Factors90% Lane Widths to 10 Feet90% Side Clearance on One Side90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
I-94 EB East of I-194/M-66

MOT: Maintain 1 Lanes Each Direction During Non-Restricted Hours (Paving Only Sun -Thur Nights)

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time V/C LOS V/C LOS 6/17/04 V/C LOS 6/18/04 V/C LOS 6/19/04 V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 830 0.60 B 833 0.60 B

2:00 AM 560 0.40 A 661 0.48 B3:00 AM 494 0.36 A 540 0.39 A4:00 AM 547 0.39 A 507 0.37 A5:00 AM 662 0.48 B 676 0.49 B6:00 AM 885 0.64 C 855 0.62 B7:00 AM 1317 0.95 E 1323 0.95 E8:00 AM 1729 1.25 E 1841 1.33 E9:00 AM 1802 1.30 E 1781 1.28 E

10:00 AM 1806 1.30 E 1881 1.36 E11:00 AM 1876 1.35 E 1856 1.34 E12:00 PM 1865 1.34 E 1777 1.28 E

1:00 PM 1738 1.25 E 1888 1.36 E2:00 PM 1892 1.36 E 2116 1.53 E3:00 PM 2029 1.46 E 2058 1.48 E4:00 PM 2267 1.63 E 2359 1.70 E 2323 1.68 E5:00 PM 2502 1.80 E 2384 1.72 E 1855 1.34 E6:00 PM 2313 1.67 E 2360 1.70 E 1523 1.10 E7:00 PM 1882 1.36 E 1887 1.36 E

8:00 PM 1515 1.09 E 1530 1.10 E9:00 PM 1492 1.08 E 1485 1.07 E

10:00 PM 1264 0.91 E 1398 1.01 E11:00 PM 1046 0.75 C 1249 0.90 E12:00 AM 835 0.60 B 930 0.67 C

Total 0 0 15,116 35,614 26,294 0 0

Capacity LOS E

1,387 Veh/hr for 1 lanes

Reduction Factors90% Lane Widths to 10 Feet90% Side Clearance on One Side90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
I-94 WB East of I-194/M-66

MOT: Maintain 1 Lanes Each Direction During Non-Restricted Hours (Paving Only Sun -Thur Nights)

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 7/23/02 V/C LOS 7/24/02 V/C LOS 7/25/02 V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 678 0.49 B 690 0.50 B

2:00 AM 476 0.34 A 481 0.35 A3:00 AM 422 0.30 A 444 0.32 A4:00 AM 475 0.34 A 508 0.37 A5:00 AM 483 0.35 A 540 0.39 A6:00 AM 690 0.50 B 751 0.54 B7:00 AM 1287 0.93 E 1344 0.97 E8:00 AM 1914 1.38 E 1751 1.26 E9:00 AM 1886 1.36 E 1913 1.38 E

10:00 AM 1979 1.43 E 2049 1.48 E11:00 AM 2067 1.49 E 2006 1.45 E 2133 1.54 E12:00 PM 2088 1.51 E 2185 1.58 E 2325 1.68 E

1:00 PM 2060 1.49 E 2136 1.54 E

2:00 PM 2055 1.48 E 2198 1.59 E3:00 PM 2212 1.60 E 2287 1.65 E4:00 PM 2405 1.73 E 2339 1.69 E5:00 PM 2350 1.69 E 2567 1.85 E6:00 PM 2389 1.72 E 2538 1.83 E7:00 PM 1810 1.31 E 1950 1.41 E8:00 PM 1492 1.08 E 1673 1.21 E9:00 PM 1280 0.92 E 1466 1.06 E

10:00 PM 1350 0.97 E 1358 0.98 E11:00 PM 1043 0.75 C 1161 0.84 E12:00 AM 887 0.64 C 900 0.65 C

Total 19,273 37,054 14,929 0 0 0 0

Capacity LOS E

1,387 Veh/hr for 1 lanes

Reduction Factors90% Lane Widths to 10 Feet90% Side Clearance on One Side90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
I-94 EB East of I-194/M-66

MOT: Maintain 1 Lanes Each Direction During Non-Restricted Hours (Paving Only Sun -Thur Nights)

Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday

Time 7/23/02 V/C LOS 7/24/02 V/C LOS 7/25/02 V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS

1:00 AM 717 0.52 B 741 0.53 B

2:00 AM 577 0.42 A 607 0.44 B3:00 AM 484 0.35 A 603 0.43 B4:00 AM 553 0.40 A 541 0.39 A5:00 AM 604 0.44 B 701 0.51 B6:00 AM 797 0.57 B 876 0.63 C7:00 AM 1333 0.96 E 1330 0.96 E8:00 AM 1679 1.21 E 1816 1.31 E9:00 AM 1750 1.26 E 1857 1.34 E

10:00 AM 1809 1.30 E 1810 1.31 E11:00 AM 1733 1.25 E 1927 1.39 E 2091 1.51 E12:00 PM 1855 1.34 E 1971 1.42 E 2014 1.45 E

1:00 PM 1889 1.36 E 1956 1.41 E

2:00 PM 1989 1.43 E 2116 1.53 E3:00 PM 2121 1.53 E 2202 1.59 E4:00 PM 2352 1.70 E 2444 1.76 E5:00 PM 2453 1.77 E 2581 1.86 E6:00 PM 2241 1.62 E 2433 1.75 E7:00 PM 1882 1.36 E 2039 1.47 E8:00 PM 1509 1.09 E 1655 1.19 E9:00 PM 1441 1.04 E 1491 1.08 E

10:00 PM 1360 0.98 E 1334 0.96 E11:00 PM 1134 0.82 D 1160 0.84 E12:00 AM 916 0.66 C 1085 0.78 D

Total 17,409 36,697 14,987 0 0 0 0

Capacity LOS E

1,387 Veh/hr for 1 lanes

Reduction Factors90% Lane Widths to 10 Feet90% Side Clearance on One Side90.1% Truck Factor for 22% Truck and 2% grade

= Restricted Hours= Non Paving Hours
Avg WB I-94 LOS

Time V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C

1:00 AM 0.48 0.47 0.48 0.17 0.14 0.43 0.49 0.50 0.19 0.212:00 AM 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.13 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.14 0.153:00 AM 0.33 0.39 0.31 0.11 0.07 0.28 0.30 0.32 0.15 0.154:00 AM 0.31 0.35 0.31 0.08 0.04 0.27 0.34 0.37 0.14 0.145:00 AM 0.39 0.40 0.40 0.07 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.39 0.15 0.156:00 AM 0.24 0.26 0.22 0.13 0.05 0.21 0.20 0.22 0.20 0.197:00 AM 0.44 0.46 0.43 0.22 0.10 0.42 0.38 0.39 0.43 0.438:00 AM 0.62 0.61 0.57 0.34 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.51 0.66 0.629:00 AM 0.58 0.60 0.60 0.43 0.24 0.52 0.55 0.56 0.73 0.70

10:00 AM 0.60 0.61 0.62 0.55 0.34 0.54 0.58 0.60 0.71 0.6811:00 AM 0.58 0.66 0.68 0.62 0.45 0.61 0.60 0.59 0.62 0.70 0.6612:00 PM 0.64 0.65 0.71 0.63 0.55 0.65 0.61 0.64 0.68 0.67 0.70

1:00 PM 0.63 0.64 0.76 0.58 0.62 0.67 0.60 0.62 0.73 0.732:00 PM 0.68 0.66 0.69 0.79 0.60 0.62 0.67 0.60 0.64 0.63 0.633:00 PM 0.64 0.68 0.68 0.90 0.57 0.64 0.66 0.65 0.67 0.63 0.634:00 PM 0.72 0.73 0.75 0.90 0.58 0.64 0.68 0.70 0.68 0.59 0.67 0.675:00 PM 0.74 0.73 0.87 0.88 0.53 0.64 0.71 0.69 0.75 0.64 0.66 0.666:00 PM 0.79 0.74 0.86 0.84 0.51 0.65 0.70 0.74 0.64 0.70 0.707:00 PM 1.40 1.56 1.57 0.76 0.48 0.62 1.31 1.41 1.26 0.698:00 PM 1.27 1.21 1.38 0.66 0.40 0.61 1.08 1.21 1.12 0.579:00 PM 1.11 1.20 1.22 0.58 0.35 1.34 0.92 1.06 0.98 0.44

10:00 PM 0.92 1.04 1.08 0.49 0.32 1.15 0.97 0.98 0.88 0.3811:00 PM 0.85 0.83 0.86 0.36 0.27 0.89 0.75 0.84 0.71 0.3312:00 AM 0.70 0.67 0.68 0.28 0.20 0.66 0.64 0.65 0.57 0.26

Total 9.82 16.27 17.08 13.89 8.86 11.34 8.58 10.82 15.56 5.50 7.39 11.54 8.81

Avg 0.89 0.68 0.71 0.58 0.37 0.47 0.50 0.77 0.65 0.46 0.82 0.48 0.49

Overall Avg V/C 0.584 =B
Avg EB I-94 LOS

Time V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C V/C

1:00 AM 0.56 0.62 0.55 0.21 0.14 0.51 0.52 0.53 0.60 0.242:00 AM 0.38 0.55 0.44 0.14 0.09 0.38 0.42 0.44 0.40 0.193:00 AM 0.31 0.35 0.34 0.12 0.07 0.30 0.35 0.43 0.36 0.164:00 AM 0.30 0.33 0.35 0.10 0.06 0.32 0.40 0.39 0.39 0.155:00 AM 0.37 0.46 0.40 0.11 0.06 0.37 0.44 0.51 0.48 0.206:00 AM 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.12 0.06 0.23 0.23 0.26 0.26 0.257:00 AM 0.41 0.41 0.39 0.18 0.11 0.38 0.39 0.39 0.38 0.398:00 AM 0.65 0.66 0.58 0.31 0.13 0.54 0.49 0.53 0.50 0.549:00 AM 0.65 0.64 0.65 0.42 0.22 0.54 0.51 0.54 0.53 0.52

10:00 AM 0.62 0.64 0.62 0.48 0.34 0.52 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.5511:00 AM 0.58 0.61 0.66 0.57 0.42 0.53 0.51 0.56 0.61 0.55 0.5412:00 PM 0.61 0.58 0.65 0.60 0.51 0.54 0.54 0.58 0.59 0.54 0.52

1:00 PM 0.60 0.60 0.67 0.63 0.61 0.57 0.55 0.57 0.51 0.552:00 PM 0.60 0.63 0.61 0.77 0.60 0.66 0.60 0.58 0.62 0.55 0.623:00 PM 0.65 0.68 0.70 0.80 0.58 0.67 0.66 0.62 0.64 0.59 0.604:00 PM 0.68 0.69 0.77 0.85 0.54 0.63 0.69 0.69 0.71 0.66 0.69 0.685:00 PM 0.76 0.76 0.74 0.87 0.54 0.73 0.69 0.72 0.75 0.73 0.70 0.546:00 PM 0.75 0.78 0.77 0.81 0.52 0.70 0.65 0.71 0.68 0.69 0.447:00 PM 1.42 1.49 1.49 0.69 0.50 0.66 1.36 1.47 1.36 0.558:00 PM 1.15 1.20 1.25 0.61 0.42 0.57 1.09 1.19 1.09 0.459:00 PM 1.02 1.14 1.14 0.55 0.35 0.67 1.04 1.08 1.08 0.43

10:00 PM 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.46 0.32 1.28 0.98 0.96 0.91 0.4111:00 PM 0.79 0.84 0.87 0.38 0.28 0.98 0.82 0.84 0.75 0.3612:00 AM 0.67 0.87 0.76 0.30 0.21 0.80 0.66 0.78 0.60 0.27

Total 9.44 16.24 16.79 13.62 8.82 11.16 8.38 10.80 15.74 5.75 7.86 11.73 7.68

Avg 0.86 0.68 0.70 0.57 0.37 0.46 0.49 0.77 0.66 0.48 0.87 0.49 0.43

Overall Avg V/C 0.578 =B
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 WB by Riverside Bridge REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 5 TITLE Bridge Replacement TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 75.0% 25.0% JOB # 75047 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 2732

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 2732

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min) 5.0%

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 934 994 0 2732

1 A 671 714 0 2732

2 A 517 550 0 2732

3 A 462 492 0 2732

4 A 435 463 0 2732

5 A 535 569 0 2732

6 A 822 875 0 2732

7 A 1,506 1603 0 2732

8 A 2,114 2249 0 2732

9 A 1,997 2125 0 2732

10 A 2,069 2202 0 2732

11 A 1,985 2112 0 2732

12 P 2,189 2329 0 2732

1 P 2,144 2281 0 2732

2 P 2,248 2392 0 2732

3 P 2,343 2493 0 2732

4 P 2,497 2657 0 2732

5 P 2,496 2656 0 2732

6 P 2,520 2681 0 2732

7 P 2,165 2304 0 2732

8 P 1,677 1784 0 2732

9 P 1,667 1774 0 2732

10 P 1,436 1528 0 2732

11 P 1,153 1227 0 2732

Total 38582 0 41054 0 65568 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $11,321 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $11,321 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 1.3 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 617 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 1443 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 1443 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 617 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.28 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.29 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 WB 4-10-08 Weekday 13081.xls traffic 3:10 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 EB East of I-194/M-66 REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 7 TITLE Bridge Replacement TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 75.0% 25.0% JOB # 75047 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 2732

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 2732

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min) 5.0%

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 1085 1184 0 2732

1 A 717 782 0 2732

2 A 577 629 0 2732

3 A 484 528 0 2732

4 A 553 603 0 2732

5 A 604 659 0 2732

6 A 797 869 0 2732

7 A 1333 1454 0 2732

8 A 1679 1832 0 2732

9 A 1750 1909 0 2732

10 A 1809 1973 0 2732

11 A 1927 2102 0 2732

12 P 1971 2150 0 2732

1 P 1956 2134 0 2732

2 P 2116 2308 0 2732

3 P 2202 2402 0 2732

4 P 2444 2666 0 2732

5 P 2581 2815 0 2732

6 P 2433 2654 0 2732

7 P 2039 2224 0 2732

8 P 1655 1805 0 2732

9 P 1491 1626 0 2732

10 P 1334 1455 0 2732

11 P 1160 1265 0 2732

Total 36697 0 40031 0 65568 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $10,493 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $10,493 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 1.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 572 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 1336 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 1336 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 572 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.26 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 EB 4-10-08 Weekday 13082.xls traffic 3:06 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 EB by Riverside Bridge REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 5 TITLE Bridge Replacement TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 75.0% 25.0% JOB # 75047 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 2732

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 2732

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min) 5.0%

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 1211 1289 0 2732

1 A 770 819 0 2732

2 A 521 554 0 2732

3 A 430 458 0 2732

4 A 418 445 0 2732

5 A 517 550 0 2732

6 A 725 771 0 2732

7 A 1,402 1492 0 2732

8 A 2,228 2371 0 2732

9 A 2,221 2363 0 2732

10 A 2,109 2244 0 2732

11 A 2,002 2130 0 2732

12 P 2,075 2208 0 2732

1 P 2,059 2191 0 2732

2 P 2,154 2292 0 2732

3 P 2,318 2467 0 2732

4 P 2,377 2529 0 2732

5 P 2,596 2762 0 2732

6 P 2,659 2829 0 2732

7 P 2,067 2199 0 2732

8 P 1,663 1770 0 2732

9 P 1,577 1678 0 2732

10 P 1,273 1355 0 2732

11 P 1,170 1245 0 2732

Total 38542 0 41012 0 65568 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $11,342 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $11,342 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 1.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 618 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 1447 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 1447 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 618 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.28 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.29 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 EB 4-10-08 Weekday 13081.xls traffic 2:59 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 WB East of I-194/M-66 REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 7 TITLE Bridge Replacement TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 75.0% 25.0% JOB # 75047 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 3732

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 2732

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min) 5.0%

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 900 982 0 2732

1 A 678 740 0 2732

2 A 476 519 0 2732

3 A 422 460 0 2732

4 A 475 518 0 2732

5 A 483 527 0 2732

6 A 690 753 0 2732

7 A 1287 1404 0 2732

8 A 1914 2088 0 2732

9 A 1886 2057 0 2732

10 A 1979 2159 0 2732

11 A 2006 2188 0 2732

12 P 2185 2384 0 2732

1 P 2136 2330 0 2732

2 P 2198 2398 0 2732

3 P 2287 2495 0 2732

4 P 2339 2551 0 2732

5 P 2567 2800 0 2732

6 P 2538 2769 0 2732

7 P 1950 2127 0 2732

8 P 1673 1825 0 2732

9 P 1466 1599 0 2732

10 P 1358 1481 0 2732

11 P 1161 1266 0 2732

Total 37054 0 40420 0 65568 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $11,115 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $11,115 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 1.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 606 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 1417 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 1417 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 606 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.28 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 WB 4-10-08 Weekday 13082.xls traffic 3:13 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 WB by Riverside Bridge REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 5 TITLE Bridge Replacement TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 88.6% 11.4% JOB # 75047 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 2732

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 2732

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min)

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 920 0 979 2732

1 A 495 0 527 2732

2 A 315 0 335 2732

3 A 237 0 252 2732

4 A 128 0 136 2732

5 A 139 0 148 2732

6 A 188 0 200 2732

7 A 337 0 359 2732

8 A 461 0 491 2732

9 A 817 0 869 2732

10 A 1,180 0 1256 2732

11 A 1,541 0 1640 2732

12 P 1,897 0 2019 2732

1 P 2,116 0 2252 2732

2 P 2,116 0 2252 2732

3 P 2,182 0 2322 2732

4 P 2,204 0 2345 2732

5 P 2,184 0 2324 2732

6 P 2,230 0 2373 2732

7 P 2,133 0 2270 2732

8 P 2,090 0 2224 2732

9 P 1,855 0 1974 2732

10 P 1,600 0 1703 2732

11 P 1,235 0 1314 2732

Total 0 30600 0 32561 0 65568 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $0 $8,101 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $0 $8,101 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 0 487 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 0 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 0 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 0 487 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.00 $0.25 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.00 $0.25 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output NOT VALID VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 WB 4-10-08 Sun 13081.xls traffic 3:07 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 EB by Riverside Bridge REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 5 TITLE Bridge Replacement TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 88.6% 11.4% JOB # 74956 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 2732

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 2732

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min)

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 487 0 518 2732

1 A 321 0 342 2732

2 A 254 0 270 2732

3 A 203 0 216 2732

4 A 195 0 207 2732

5 A 198 0 211 2732

6 A 373 0 397 2732

7 A 439 0 467 2732

8 A 769 0 818 2732

9 A 1,156 0 1230 2732

10 A 1,453 0 1546 2732

11 A 1,754 0 1866 2732

12 P 2,078 0 2211 2732

1 P 2,261 0 2406 2732

2 P 2,282 0 2428 2732

3 P 2,147 0 2285 2732

4 P 2,485 0 2644 2732

5 P 2,380 0 2533 2732

6 P 2,274 0 2420 2732

7 P 1,952 0 2077 2732

8 P 2,293 0 2440 2732

9 P 1,771 0 1884 2732

10 P 1,357 0 1444 2732

11 P 1,105 0 1176 2732

Total 0 31987 0 34037 0 65568 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $0 $9,051 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $0 $9,051 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 0.0 1.4 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 0 544 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 0 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 0 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 0 544 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.00 $0.27 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.00 $0.27 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output NOT VALID VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 EB 4-10-08 Sun 13081.xls traffic 2:50 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 EB by Riverside Bridge REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 5 TITLE Bridge Replacement TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 88.6% 11.4% JOB # 74956 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 2732

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 2732

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min)

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 729 0 776 2732

1 A 465 0 495 2732

2 A 412 0 438 2732

3 A 333 0 354 2732

4 A 376 0 400 2732

5 A 417 0 444 2732

6 A 618 0 658 2732

7 A 1,049 0 1116 2732

8 A 1,428 0 1520 2732

9 A 1,628 0 1732 2732

10 A 1,962 0 2088 2732

11 A 2,047 0 2178 2732

12 P 2,151 0 2289 2732

1 P 2,048 0 2179 2732

2 P 1,979 0 2106 2732

3 P 1,837 0 1955 2732

4 P 1,842 0 1960 2732

5 P 1,778 0 1892 2732

6 P 1,696 0 1805 2732

7 P 1,441 0 1533 2732

8 P 1,200 0 1277 2732

9 P 1,102 0 1173 2732

10 P 944 0 1004 2732

11 P 720 0 766 2732

Total 0 30202 0 32137 0 65568 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday

total user cost $0 $6,796 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $0 $6,796 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 0.0 1.1 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 0 408 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 0 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 0 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 0 408 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.00 $0.21 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.00 $0.21 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output NOT VALID VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 EB 4-10-08 Sat 13081.xls traffic 3:25 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 WB by Riverside Bridge REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 5 TITLE Bridge Replacement TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 88.6% 11.4% JOB # 75047 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 2732

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 2732

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min)

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 590 0 628 2732

1 A 446 0 475 2732

2 A 361 0 384 2732

3 A 259 0 276 2732

4 A 255 0 271 2732

5 A 440 0 468 2732

6 A 742 0 790 2732

7 A 1,148 0 1222 2732

8 A 1,458 0 1551 2732

9 A 1,874 0 1994 2732

10 A 2,113 0 2248 2732

11 A 2,162 0 2301 2732

12 P 1,991 0 2119 2732

1 P 2,048 0 2179 2732

2 P 1,962 0 2088 2732

3 P 1,990 0 2118 2732

4 P 1,811 0 1927 2732

5 P 1,748 0 1860 2732

6 P 1,642 0 1747 2732

7 P 1,372 0 1460 2732

8 P 1,201 0 1278 2732

9 P 1,103 0 1174 2732

10 P 925 0 984 2732

11 P 689 0 733 2732

Total 0 30330 0 32274 0 65568 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday Weekday Saturday

total user cost $0 $8,101 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $0 $8,101 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 0 487 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 0 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 0 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 0 487 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.00 $0.25 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.00 $0.25 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 WB 4-10-08 Sat 13081.xls traffic 3:24 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 WB by Riverside Bridge REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 5 TITLE CPM Mill & Fill TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 & 13082 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 75.0% 25.0% JOB # 102807 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 1387

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 1387

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min) 5.0%

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 934 994 0 1387

1 A 671 714 0 1387

2 A 517 550 0 1387

3 A 462 492 0 1387

4 A 435 463 0 1387

5 A 535 569 0 1387

6 A 822 875 0 3000

7 A 1,506 1603 0 3000

8 A 2,114 2249 0 3000

9 A 1,997 2125 0 3000

10 A 2,069 2202 0 3000

11 A 1,985 2112 0 3000

12 P 2,189 2329 0 3000

1 P 2,144 2281 0 3000

2 P 2,248 2392 0 3000

3 P 2,343 2493 0 3000

4 P 2,497 2657 0 3000

5 P 2,496 2656 0 3000

6 P 2,520 2681 0 3000

7 P 2,165 2304 0 1387

8 P 1,677 1784 0 1387

9 P 1,667 1774 0 1387

10 P 1,436 1528 0 1387

11 P 1,153 1227 0 1387

Total 38582 0 41054 0 54257 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $12,563 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $12,563 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 276 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 13.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 654 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 1962 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 1962 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 654 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.31 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 WB 4-10-08 Weekday 13081.xls traffic 2:54 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 WB by Riverside Bridge REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 5 TITLE CPM Mill & Fill TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 & 13082 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 88.6% 11.4% JOB # 102807 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 1387

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 1387

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min)

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 920 0 979 3000

1 A 495 0 527 3000

2 A 315 0 335 3000

3 A 237 0 252 3000

4 A 128 0 136 3000

5 A 139 0 148 3000

6 A 188 0 200 3000

7 A 337 0 359 3000

8 A 461 0 491 3000

9 A 817 0 869 3000

10 A 1,180 0 1256 3000

11 A 1,541 0 1640 3000

12 P 1,897 0 2019 3000

1 P 2,116 0 2252 3000

2 P 2,116 0 2252 3000

3 P 2,182 0 2322 3000

4 P 2,204 0 2345 3000

5 P 2,184 0 2324 3000

6 P 2,230 0 2373 3000

7 P 2,133 0 2270 3000

8 P 2,090 0 2224 3000

9 P 1,855 0 1974 1387

10 P 1,600 0 1703 1387

11 P 1,235 0 1314 1387

Total 0 30600 0 32561 0 67161 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $0 $35,258 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $0 $35,258 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 0 902 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 0.0 40.5 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 0 2119 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 0 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 0 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 0 2119 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.00 $1.08 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.00 $1.08 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output NOT VALID VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 WB 4-10-08 Sun 13081.xls traffic 2:53 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 EB by Riverside Bridge REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 5 TITLE CPM Mill & Fill TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 & 13082 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 88.6% 11.4% JOB # 102807 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 1387

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 1387

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min)

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 487 0 518 3000

1 A 321 0 342 3000

2 A 254 0 270 3000

3 A 203 0 216 3000

4 A 195 0 207 3000

5 A 198 0 211 3000

6 A 373 0 397 3000

7 A 439 0 467 3000

8 A 769 0 818 3000

9 A 1,156 0 1230 3000

10 A 1,453 0 1546 3000

11 A 1,754 0 1866 3000

12 P 2,078 0 2211 3000

1 P 2,261 0 2406 3000

2 P 2,282 0 2428 3000

3 P 2,147 0 2285 3000

4 P 2,485 0 2644 3000

5 P 2,380 0 2533 3000

6 P 2,274 0 2420 3000

7 P 1,952 0 2077 3000

8 P 2,293 0 2440 3000

9 P 1,771 0 1884 1387

10 P 1,357 0 1444 1387

11 P 1,105 0 1176 1387

Total 0 31987 0 34037 0 67161 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $0 $16,048 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $0 $16,048 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 0 406 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 0.0 19.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 0 964 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 0 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 0 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 0 964 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 EB 4-10-08 Sun 13081.xls traffic 2:51 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 EB East of I-194/M-66 REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 7 TITLE CPM Mill & Fill TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 & 13082 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 75.0% 25.0% JOB # 102807 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 1387

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 1387

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min) 5.0%

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 1085 1184 0 1387

1 A 717 782 0 1387

2 A 577 629 0 1387

3 A 484 528 0 1387

4 A 553 603 0 1387

5 A 604 659 0 1387

6 A 797 869 0 3000

7 A 1333 1454 0 3000

8 A 1679 1832 0 3000

9 A 1750 1909 0 3000

10 A 1809 1973 0 3000

11 A 1927 2102 0 3000

12 P 1971 2150 0 3000

1 P 1956 2134 0 3000

2 P 2116 2308 0 3000

3 P 2202 2402 0 3000

4 P 2444 2666 0 3000

5 P 2581 2815 0 3000

6 P 2433 2654 0 3000

7 P 2039 2224 0 1387

8 P 1655 1805 0 1387

9 P 1491 1626 0 1387

10 P 1334 1455 0 1387

11 P 1160 1265 0 1387

Total 36697 0 40031 0 54257 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $18,006 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $18,006 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 388 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 18.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 910 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 3129 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 3129 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 910 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 EB 4-10-08 Weekday 13082.xls traffic 2:52 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 EB by Riverside Bridge REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 5 TITLE CPM Mill & Fill TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 & 13082 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 75.0% 25.0% JOB # 102807 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 1387

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 1387

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min) 5.0%

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 1211 1289 0 1387

1 A 770 819 0 1387

2 A 521 554 0 1387

3 A 430 458 0 1387

4 A 418 445 0 1387

5 A 517 550 0 1387

6 A 725 771 0 3000

7 A 1,402 1492 0 3000

8 A 2,228 2371 0 3000

9 A 2,221 2363 0 3000

10 A 2,109 2244 0 3000

11 A 2,002 2130 0 3000

12 P 2,075 2208 0 3000

1 P 2,059 2191 0 3000

2 P 2,154 2292 0 3000

3 P 2,318 2467 0 3000

4 P 2,377 2529 0 3000

5 P 2,596 2762 0 3000

6 P 2,659 2829 0 1387

7 P 2,067 2199 0 1387

8 P 1,663 1770 0 1387

9 P 1,577 1678 0 1387

10 P 1,273 1355 0 1387

11 P 1,170 1245 0 1387

Total 38542 0 41012 0 52644 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $18,006 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $18,006 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 388 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 18.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 910 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 3129 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 3129 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 7.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 910 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.44 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 EB 4-10-08 Weekday 13081.xls traffic 2:52 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 WB East of I-194/M-66 REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 7 TITLE CPM Mill & Fill TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 & 13082 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 75.0% 25.0% JOB # 102807 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/10/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Night work 

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 1387

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 1387

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min) 5.0%

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 900 982 0 1387

1 A 678 740 0 1387

2 A 476 519 0 1387

3 A 422 460 0 1387

4 A 475 518 0 1387

5 A 483 527 0 1387

6 A 690 753 0 3000

7 A 1287 1404 0 3000

8 A 1914 2088 0 3000

9 A 1886 2057 0 3000

10 A 1979 2159 0 3000

11 A 2006 2188 0 3000

12 P 2185 2384 0 3000

1 P 2136 2330 0 3000

2 P 2198 2398 0 3000

3 P 2287 2495 0 3000

4 P 2339 2551 0 3000

5 P 2567 2800 0 3000

6 P 2538 2769 0 3000

7 P 1950 2127 0 1387

8 P 1673 1825 0 1387

9 P 1466 1599 0 1387

10 P 1358 1481 0 1387

11 P 1161 1266 0 1387

Total 37054 0 40420 0 54257 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $10,644 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $10,644 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 229 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 11.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 558 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 1618 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 1618 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 558 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.26 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.27 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 WB 4-10-08 Weekday 13082.xls traffic 2:54 PM 4/10/2008
SummaryView

period length (min) 60 PROJECT INFORMATION REPORT INFORMATION

annual traffic growth (%) 1.25% PROJECT I-94 EB East of I-194/M-66 REPORT DETAILED USER COST REPORT

years of growth 5 TITLE CPM Mill & Fill TITLE SUMMARY SHEET

VEHICLE INPUT cars trucks C.S. 13081 & 13082 DIVISION Marshall

design demand (%) 75.0% 25.0% JOB # 102807 REPORT BY AMK

user cost per hour ($/V hr) $15.31 $27.02 START DATE Summer 09 REPORT DATE 4/22/2008

 user cost per mile, ($/V mi) $0.45 $1.59 NOTES: Night Paving Sunday Night through Thur Night

user cost per cancellation, ($/V) Morning Fine Amount

METHOD INPUT METHOD 1 METHOD 2 METHOD 3 METHOD 4

method title

DISTANCE AND SPEED (mi) (mph) distance speed distance speed distance speed distance speed

work zone method travel 2.0 see delay see delay see delay see delay

normal travel 2.0 70.0

diversion method travel

normal travel

SPEED DELAY threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for speed delay (V/period) 1387

speed (when D~0) (mph) 60

 speed (when D=C) (mph) 38

DECREASE TO DEMAND threshold range threshold range threshold range threshold range

capacity for decreases to design demand (V/period) 1387

 canceled cars (with no delay) (%)

canceled trucks (with no delay) (%)

canceled cars (with delay) (%/min)

canceled trucks (with delay) (%/min)

 diverted cars (with no delay) (%)

diverted trucks (with no delay) (%)

diverted cars (with delay) (%/min) 5.0%

diverted trucks (with delay) (%/min)

OTHER USER COST INPUT cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks cars trucks

other user cost per actual demand ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

user cost per diversion ($/V) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

PERIOD INPUT backup at start (V) 0 0 00 00 00

direction: Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Saturday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

period historical demand design demand capacity capacity capacity capacity

(hr) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period) (V/period)

12 A 830 883 0 1387

1 A 560 596 0 1387

2 A 494 526 0 1387

3 A 574 611 0 1387

4 A 662 704 0 1387

5 A 885 942 0 1387

6 A 1317 1401 0 1387

7 A 1729 1840 0 3000

8 A 1802 1917 0 3000

9 A 1806 1922 0 3000

10 A 1876 1996 0 3000

11 A 1865 1985 0 3000

12 P 1738 1849 0 3000

1 P 1892 2013 0 3000

2 P 2029 2159 0 3000

3 P 2359 2510 0 3000

4 P 2384 2537 0 3000

5 P 2360 2511 0 3000

6 P 1887 2008 0 3000

7 P 1530 1628 0 3000

8 P 1485 1580 0 3000

9 P 1398 1488 0 3000

10 P 1249 1329 0 3000

11 P 930 990 0 3000

Total 35641 0 37925 0 60709 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SUMMARY OUTPUT traffic method Weekday & Sun

direction Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday Weekday Sunday

total user cost $1,333 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of delays $1,333 $0 $0 $1,694 $0 $0 $0 $0

user cost of decreases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

maximum backup (V) 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 0

maximum backup length (lane mi) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

maximum delay (min.) 1.4 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

average delay, except diversions (min) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, except diversions (V hr) 73 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

total vehicles canceled(V) 0 0 00 00 00

total vehicles diverted (V) 169 0 00 00 00

total decrease in demand (V) 169 0 00 00 00

% decrease in demand 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

delay per diverted vehicle (min) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total diversion delay (V hr) 0 0 00 00 00

average delay, including diversions (min) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

total delay, including diversions (V hr) 73 0 0 94 0 0 0 0

user cost / design demand $0.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

delay cost / actual demand $0.04 $0.00 $0.00 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Auto: OK ON Print: ON Now: OK validity of output VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID NOT VALID

I-94CO3 EB 4-22-08 Weekday Fine.xls traffic 2:28 PM 4/22/2008
D. Clauses 
 13081-75047A 

 

PROGRESS CLAUSE: After receiving Notice of Award, start work on 4-13-09. 

No work shall be commenced prior to receipt of formal notice of award by the Department. 

The contract shall be open to traffic on or before 11-13-09. 

All work shall be completed on or before 11-13-09 except maintenance of soil erosion and 

sedimentation control items. 

This contract shall be completed on or before 5-30-10. 

The low bidder(s) for the work covered by this proposal will be required to meet with 

Department representatives to work out a detailed Progress Schedule. 

The named subcontractor(s) for Designated and/or Specialty Items, as shown in the proposal is 

recommended to be at the scheduled meeting if such items materially affect the work schedule. 

The Delivery Engineer will arrange the time and place for the meeting. 

The Progress Schedule shall include, as a minimum, the controlling work items for the 

completion of the project and the planned dates (or work day for a work day project) that these 

work items will be controlling operations. When specified in the Bidding proposal, the date the 

project is to be opened to traffic as well as the final project completion date shall also be 

included in the Progress Schedule. 

If the Bidding Proposal specified other controlling dates, these shall also be included in the 

Progress Schedule. 

Failure on the part of the Contractor to carry out the provisions of the Progress Schedule, as 

established, may be considered sufficient cause to prevent bidding future projects until a 

satisfactory rate of progress is again established. 

The low bidder(s) for the work covered by this proposal may be required to meet with 

department representatives for a post-construction review meeting, as directed by the Engineer. 

The MDOT Delivery Engineer will schedule the meetings. 
COORDINATION CLAUSE FOR 

 OTHER CONTRACTS IN VICINITY

 

 CS 13081 - JN 75047A

The contractor shall coordinate their construction and traffic maintenance with the following project: 

CS 13082 (13083) – JN 74956A: This project is a HMA overlay, concrete pavement repairs under 

the structures, ramp improvements, and guardrail upgrades on I-94 in Calhoun County. The 

construction completion is anticipated for xx/xx/2009 

CS 13081 (13082) – JN 102807A: This project is a capital preventative maintenance HMA overlay 

on I-94 in Calhoun County. The construction completion is anticipated for xx/xx/2009. 

The contractor's attention is called to the requirements of cooperation with others as covered in 

Article 104.07 of the 2003 Standard Specifications Construction. 

No claim for extra compensation or adjustments in contract unit prices will be allowed due to delay 

caused by other projects. 
E. Maintenance of Traffic 
 MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

 SPECIAL PROVISION 

 FOR 

MAINTAINING TRAFFIC, 

PERMANENT SIGNING, AND PAVEMENT MARKING

MAR:SJRF 1 of 12 T&S:APPR:INITIALS:00-00-00 

a. Description. This work consists of all labor, materials and equipment required to maintain 

traffic in accordance with this special provision for the work on I-94 and Riverside Drive, in 

the city of Battle Creek, Calhoun County. 

b. General. Maintain traffic according to subsections 103.05, 103.06, 812 and sections 922 of 

the Standard Specifications for Construction, including any Supplemental Specifications, 

and as specified herein. 

1. Notify the Project Engineer a minimum of 24 hours prior to the implementation of any 

detours, road closures, bridge closures, ramp closures or lane closures and major traffic 

shifts.

2. Coordinate operations with Contractors performing work on other projects within or 

adjacent to the Construction Influence Area (CIA). 

3. MDOT maintenance crews and/or contract maintenance agencies may perform 

maintenance work within or adjacent to the Construction Influence Area (CIA). The 

Maintenance Division of MDOT and/or contract maintenance agency will coordinate their 

operations with the Delivery Engineer to minimize the interference. All additional costs 

for joint use of traffic control items will be borne by the Contractor 

c. Construction Influence Area (CIA). The CIA includes the right-of-way of the following 

roadways, within the approximate limits described below: 

1. On I-94, from approximately * feet east of the east reference line to * feet west of the 

west reference line. 

 On Riverside Drive, from approximately Beckly Road to Shrotridge Road. 

Include in the CIA the rights-of-way of any intersecting roads and ramps adjacent to the 

work zone for a distance of approximately 550 feet in advance of the state trunkline and 

700 feet in advance of ramps. 

d. Traffic Restrictions. 

1. Cease work prior to the Memorial Day, July 4th, or Labor Day holiday periods, as 

defined by the Engineer.

2. Perform work during daytime hours only. Allow night work only at the discretion of the 

Engineer. Any additional cost for maintaining traffic will be borne by the Contractor. 

3. Maintain a minimum of 2 lane(s) of traffic in each direction at all times on I-94. 

MOT Concept at Plan Review

Stage

* f * f

Minimum lane widths 11 feet
MAR:SJRF 2 of 7 3/24/08

4. Do not occupy any part of the active traffic lane when utilizing a shoulder closure with 

personnel or equipment. 

5. Notify the Engineer at least 24 hours in advance of erection or removal of overlays on 

existing signs. 

6. Cover existing regulatory, warning and construction signs that are not applicable during 

construction. 

7. Continue work that is initiated that includes any lane restrictions until completed. A lack 

of work activity for more than one week requires the removal and replacement of lane 

restrictions with all the costs borne by the Contractor. 

8. Provide access for pedestrians as shown on attached typical *. Construct no more than 

one sidewalk on either side of the road at one time. 

9. Maintain the non-motorized path crossing * on a paved surface, at all times, during the 

construction. 

10. Restrict access for construction vehicles between traveled lanes and work areas to 

specific locations. The number of access points and their locations requires the 

approval of the Engineer. 

11. Restore undercuts or excavations in the widening area immediately adjacent to active 

traffic lanes to no less than a one-on-four slope at the end of each working period unless 

otherwise approved by the Engineer. Require and provide fencing to protect open 

trenches during non-working hours as part of the trenching item utilized. 

12. Restrict undercuts or excavations in the HMA shoulder work areas immediately adjacent 

to active traffic lanes to a 1 on 4 slope from the edge of the roadway at the end of each 

working period unless otherwise approved by the Engineer 

13. Complete, inspect and approve all proposed work on the detour route prior to its use. 

Place pavement markings on the detour route in accordance with the attached convoy 

details PM* and PM*. 

14. Remove and replace guardrail so that exposure to the area protected by it is reduced to 

a minimum. Use a shoulder closure during non-working periods when there is a guardrail 

work site with incomplete work. Refer to the Standard Specifications for Construction 

Section 807.03. 

15. Complete the embankment operation up to the bottom of the proposed sand subbase 

prior to the removal of any portion of the shoulder. (This is a good note for passing flare 

projects.)

e. Work Zone Speeds. 

1. Set work zone speeds according to the 2006 Guidelines to Establish Speed Limits in 

Work Zones. 

May not be possible with construction staging.
MAR:SJRF 3 of 7 3/24/08

2. Post additional “WHEN WORKERS PRESENT 45” mph speed limit signs at one mile 

intervals throughout the work zone. 

f. Stage Construction. Base the traffic control required by this Special Provision for work on * 

and adjacent roadways on the suggested sequence of operations contained in the staging 

plans. Use an alternate traffic control plan, subject to review and approval by the Engineer. 

Require the following brief description of traffic control detailed on the plans during each 

construction stage. 

1. Stage I. 

2. Stage II. 

3. Stage III. 

g. Traffic Control Devices.

1. General. 

A. Conform all traffic control devices and their usage to Part 6 of the Michigan Manual 

of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). This document can be found at the 

following website:

http://mdotwas1.mdot.state.mi.us/public/tands/plans.cfm

B. Place advance signs (W20-1 - "Road Work Ahead") and lighted plastic drums at any 

work site with uncompleted work during non-working periods as the Engineer directs. 

All costs associated with this work will be borne by the Contractor. 

C. Perform barrier operations such as slip forming or placing temporary concrete 

barriers with the flow of the traffic. 

D. During construction, maintain access to all business and residential drives. 

E. Erect all signs on the * detour route and properly orient prior to closure. Erect all 

advance signs on the * detour route and cover prior to the closure of the * bridge.

2. Temporary Signs. 

A. Place temporary sign spacing and taper lengths as shown on attached Typical 

M000e.

B. Place ground driven sign supports as shown on attached Traffic and Safety Standard 

Plan Special Detail WZD-100-A. Refer to Traffic and Safety Standard Plan WZD125-D for portable supports. 

C. Place signing for the beginning and ending of the work zone as shown on attached 

Typical M0080a.

I-94 and

Riverside

Drive

Riverside Drive will be detoured for the duration of the project. Utilizing Minges Road to Capital Avenue, to Beckley Road (B

Drive North).

Part Width Construction on each Bridge for Eastbound and Westbound I-94.

Stage 1: Shift 2 lanes of traffic for each bound to the outside of existing bridge. Remove inside portion of each bridge.

Stage 2: Traffic remain shifted to outside of existing bridge. Construct new inside portion of bridge wide enough for 2 lanes of

traffic in Stage 3.

Stage 3: Shift 2 lanes of traffic to inside of newly constructed bridge. Remove outside portion of each bridge.

Stage 4: Traffic remain shifted to inside of newly constructed bridge. Construct new outside portion of bridge.

Riverside Drive

Road

M0020a

M0070a
MAR:SJRF 4 of 7 3/24/08

D. Place signing for a traffic shift as shown on attached Typical *. 

E. Place signing for the * detour route as shown in the Maintaining Traffic Special 

Provision and on the plans. 

F. Place signing for * on attached Typical *. 

G. Include (#) W20-1 ("ROAD WORK AHEAD") signs in the quantities, to place on 

ramps or intersecting roads in advance of construction areas as the Engineer directs. 

(The required amount of side street (“ROAD WORK AHEAD”) signs can be found 

using the Traffic Regulator Matrix spreadsheet found at the following location: 

pwname://MDOTProjectWise/Documents/~Southwest Region/Regionwide Traffic 

and Safety/Maintaining Traffic/Work Zone Mobility/Flagger Matrix.xls ) 

H. Place (#) W20-15b (WATCH FOR TRAFFIC BACKUPS/BE PREPARED TO STOP) 

signs at locations designated by the Engineer. 

I. Place (#) “ROAD WORK STARTS **/**/** signs, a minimum of seven days prior to 

the start of work and remove it within seven days of the start of construction. 

J. Mount all temporary signs at a five-foot minimum bottom height in uncurbed areas 

and seven-foot minimum bottom height in curbed or pedestrian areas. 

K. Consider distances shown between construction warning, regulatory and guide signs 

shown on the typicals as approximate. Signs may require field adjustment, as the 

Engineer directs. 

L. Fabricate all temporary signs with legends and symbols flush to the signs face and 

do not extend beyond the sign borders or edges. 

M. Mount all temporary signs that will be in place for more than 14 days on driven posts. 

N. Refer to Traffic and Safety Standard Plan WZD-125-D when installing temporary 

diamond signs with portable supports. Note that the Type A Warning Light is 

required.

O.When a portable construction sign is no longer applicable, remove it or lay it down on 

its non-reflective side with its feet off. 

P.Use Portable Changeable Message Signs (PCMS) to warn traffic of upcoming work 

and changing traffic control during the life of the project. Deploy the PCMS’s a 

minimum of seven calendar days prior to the start of work. Secure the PCMS’s by 

elevating the tires above the ground or through the use of wheel chocks or 

sandbags. Obtain approval from the Engineer for all sign locations and all messages 

placed on the sign prior to displaying the message. 

Q.Use Type C Lighted Arrows (min 48 inch x 98 inch) to merge traffic and secure by 

Use typical M081b - MOD2

Riverside Drive

Enough for

each ramp

on Capital

and I-194/

M-66

Interchanges

Use PCMB's

instead

Rumble Strip Filler

needed for stage 1 & 2

or Rumble Strip

Warning signs
MAR:SJRF 5 of 7 3/24/08

elevating the tires above the ground, or use wheel chocks or sandbags. 

R.The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires all signs to be NCHRP 350 

crashworthy. For design and configuration refer to their website: 

http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/road_hardware/workzone_pdmenu.cfm

3. Permanent Signs. 

A. Fabricate and place all permanent signing according to the Michigan Manual of 

Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD), Standard Highway Signs Manual and 

Sign Support Typicals, published by the Michigan Department of Transportation. 

B. Mount all permanent signs at a seven-foot bottom height. 

C. Fabricate all new permanent signs provided for this job with High-Intensity Reflective 

sheeting.

D. Use the sign fabrication details included for permanent signs. Prior to fabricating 

non-standard permanent signs, provide shop drawings similar to the Standard 

Highway Signs Standards and deliver the drawings to the Project Engineer for review 

and approval. Do not construe Materials and Technology Division certification of 

signs as an MDOT approval of sign legend and layout. 

4. Channelizing Devices. 

A. Use 42” channelizing devices on Riverside Drive. 

B. Use lighted plastic drums with high intensity sheeting for required channelizing 

devices on I-94. 

C. Use only tubular markers for required channelizing devices. 

D. Use only 42” cones meeting Special Provision requirements for channelizing 

devices.

E. Use channelizing devices to delineate the edgelines of right shoulders exceeding six 

inches in width until the edgelines are painted. Use channelizing devices to delineate 

all left shoulder edgelines regardless of width until the edgelines are painted. 

F. Use eight-foot Barricade, Type III, High Intensity, Lighted to block off Riverside Drive. 

G. Place temporary concrete barrier on I-94 as shown in the construction plans. Note: 

Place yellow & crystal reflectors back-to-back at ten-foot spacing on the temporary 

concrete barriers or as directed by the Engineer and include in the payment for 

"Concrete Barrier, Temporary, Furnished". 

5. Temporary Pavement Markings. 

Using Barrels if room

Adding Note for Attenuator ending for concrete barrier wall
MAR:SJRF 6 of 7 3/24/08

A. Temporary pavement markings shall consist of: 

Pavt Mrkg, Type R, Tape, 6 inch, Grey, Temp 

 Pavt Mrkg, Type R, 4 inch, White, Temp 

Pavt Mrkg, Type R, 4 inch, Yellow, Temp 

B. Place temporary pavement markings, Type R, on existing pavement areas that will 

remain after construction and on new pavement for interim traffic control at locations 

the Engineer specifies. Offset material four inches from the permanent marking 

location on new surfaces where Type R is used for temporary lane lines. 

C. During paving operations, base quantities for temporary tape placed on four-inch 

strips, four-feet long, spaced at 50 feet center to center for lane lines and centerline. 

Double that for centerline marked for no passing, and mark solid for edgeline. For 

severe curvature, use four-inch strips, four-feet long at 25 feet center to center. 

D. Ensure that all temporary pavement markings adhere to the pavement surface until 

permanent markings are installed when using Type R or NR tape. Include all cost for 

any additional adhesives or other materials are included with these Pay Items. 

E. Replace all existing pavement markings that are removed for traffic control or 

obliterated during construction operations with waterborne paint. 

6. Permanent Pavement Markings. 

A. Permanent pavement markings consist of the following: 

 4 inch white recessed wet retroflective preformed tape for lane lines on I-94 

 4 inch yellow waterborne for lane lines on Riverside Drive 

 6 inch white and 6 inch yellow waterborne for edgelines on I-94 and Riverside Drive 

B. Use white coldplastic pavement markings for all symbols and legends. 

C. Apply the second application of waterborne pavement markings only if the first 

application was properly applied and deteriorated prematurely. 

D. Plan quantities include one application of permanent pavement markings for the 

detour route. 

E. Fabricate all pavement markings per MDOT Pavement Marking Typicals VIII 900E 

through VIII 990E. 

h. Measurement and Payment. The estimate of quantities for maintaining traffic is based on 

signing and related traffic control devices.

1. Measure and pay for all traffic control items in accordance with Section 812.04 of the 

Standard Specifications of Construction. 

2. Payment for temporary signs will be made based on the maximum square foot of 

dissimilar sign legends in use at any one time during the project.

Waterborne quantity too small

PAVE-900

PAVE-990
MAR:SJRF 7 of 7 3/24/08

3. Payment for temporary and permanent pavement markings will be made by the foot. 

4. All cost of additional signing or maintaining traffic devices required to expedite the 

construction will be borne by the Contractor.

Will list each sign used in MOT






5.5 8

4.1 12.9 8 20.9 4.1

4.5

18

50

1.5" Radius, 0.8" Border, 0.4" Indent, Black on Orange; 

“ON I-94” D; 

4.1

11.6

25.0

28.1

33.140.0

O N I -9 4

SF-1
4.5 6

16.1 33.8

3 6

6.3 53.4

16.1

6.3

4.5

24

66

1.6" Radius, 0.9" Border, 0.6" Indent, Black on Orange; 

“ATTENTION” C; “MOTORCYCLISTS” C; 

25 8

15.8 34.4

4.5 8

18.9 28.2

16.3

19.4

21

66.5

66.5

48.0" across sides 1.6" Radius, 0.9" Border, 0.6" Indent, Black on Orange; 

“RUMBLE” C; “STRIPS” C 75‰ spacing; 

S S

S S
12 8

23.3 58.1 8 49.3

6 8

50.9 60.2

6 8

12.7 9.5 8 25.5 8 47.3 8 30.3

23.3

50.9

12.7

12

60

162

9.0" Radius, 2.0" Border, Black on White; 

“OVERWIDTH VEHICLES” D; “PROHIBITED” D; “10 FOOT MAXIMUM WIDTH” D; 

23.3

30.4

37.9

44.3

51.2

59.7

62.8

69.7

76.1

89.4

96.9

103.3

110.6

113.7

120.6

126.9

133.3

50.9

58.2

65.1

72.6

79.8

82.9

90.292.9

99.3

105.7

12.7

16.5

30.2

36.5

43.7

50.8

63.7

71.3

79.5

86.4

89.5

97.6

104.8

119.0

127.5

130.7

137.5

143.9

O I I

O I I

O O I I

R 1 1-4 M O D
94



94



4 

94



66



iM gn se rB oo k

E I 94

Brickyard Creek

a H pr r e i V all eg

Beachfie dl

N I 194 E/ I 94

Hamilton

6 Mile

Buck el y

Lynwood

E I 94/N I 194

W I 94 S/ I 194

49I W/ 491I S

6 1/2 Mile

Edgebrook

D

W I 94

Deer Path

Beckley B

E I 94 S/ I 194

Christy

Knapp

Lois

keer Csegni M

Lady Jessica

Country C ul b

Fairway

6 M 6

segni M

W I 94/N I 194

Moorland

Watkins

W I 94/5 Mile

Hickory

kr a mti W

W/ 491I N 49I

Wealthy

Briar Hill

Summit

Beckwith

Christian

Riverside

Pheasant Run

Orchard

Fuller

Rebecca

Rambl ni g

Reyn

Dunham

S I 194/E I 94

N I 194

Capital

Edgehill

491I S

t ser oF segni M Bach

Brookf ei dl

Battle Creek Rest Area

E I 94/Beckley

Hoyt

blli H oor k

5 Mi el W/ I 94

Beck el y E/ I 94

Wah Wah Tay See

Bridgewood

Hills

Park

Greentree

Oakland

Eas wt ay

Embury

Abram

Lamson

E sl ni ore

Parkway

Will ai ms

Devon

Shortr di ge

Hoover

Oakbrook

Oakside

r ehpot sir hC

Long el y

Adam

Lincoln Hill

Mason

F ar nc si

Forestview

Ridgeway

a H vr se t

Country Pine

Val el yv ei w

Pinegrove

nl ocni L

Peachtree

East

t se W

Thornapple ar ol F

T mi othy

ya R sn

Woodbine

ena D

Crestwood

yrr ehC

Birchwood

Wyncrest

Prospect

Woodbri

Perry

Wes

Harper C

pA

N ci ho sl



0 .1 .2 .3

Miles

Normal Route 1.98 Minutes

Detour Route 3.97 Minutes

 Structures S05-3 & S05-4 of 13081

JN75047 CS13081

Minges

Beckley

Capital

Riverside
 MICHIGAN 

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

 SPECIAL PROVISION 

 FOR 

MAINTAINING TRAFFIC

AND PAVEMENT MARKING

SWR:DLL 1 of 18 T&S:APPR:AMK:04-21-08 

a. Description. This work consists of all labor, materials and equipment required to 

maintain traffic in accordance with this special provision for the Cold milling and Hot 

Mix Asphalt (HMA) overlay of mainline and ramps at the following Locations: 

1. Location A: I-94 (WB & EB) from west of M-311 (11 Mile Road) to approximately 

one mile east of M-311 (11 Mile Road), in Emmett Township, in Calhoun County. 

2. Location B: M-89 from Naomi Street to Hicks Street in the City of Plainwell, in 

Allegan County. 

3. Location C: M-60 from North Locust Street to Congress Street in the Village of 

Mendon, in St. Joseph County. 

4. Location D: I-196Bl from Blue Star Highway to Aylworth Avenue in South Haven 

Township, in Van Buren County. 

5. Location E: US-31 (SB) at four locations, starting at the Indiana/Michigan State 

Line in Bertrand Township, in Berrien County. This location includes the milling of 

concrete pavement. 

b. General. Maintain traffic according to subsections 103.05 & 103.06 and sections 

812 & 922 of the Standard Specifications for Construction, including any 

Supplemental Specifications, and as specified herein. 

1. Notify the Project Engineer a minimum of 24 hours prior to the implementation of 

any detours, lane closures on bridges, ramp narrowing, ramp closures, shoulder 

closures, lane closures or major traffic shifts on mainline.

2. Coordinate operations with Contractors performing work on other projects within 

or adjacent to the Construction Influence Area (CIA). See Coordination Clause

for projects on Location A: I-94 and Location C: M-60. 

3. MDOT maintenance crews and/or contract maintenance agencies may perform 

maintenance work within or adjacent to the Construction Influence Area (CIA). 

The Maintenance Division of MDOT and/or contract maintenance agency will 

coordinate their operations with the Delivery Engineer to minimize the 

interference. All additional costs for joint use of traffic control items will be borne 

by the Contractor. 

4. Changes and/or adjustments to the Maintaining traffic plans and standards may 

be applied as approved by the Engineer. 

Helmer Road

6 1/2 Mile Road

2009 CPM Project Just Approved: MOT Concept will be

very similar to this project. Items crossed out that do not

apply.

Battle Creek and
SWR:DLL 2 of 18 04-21-08

c. Construction Influence Area (CIA). The CIA includes the right-of-way of the 

following roadways, within the approximate limits described below: 

Location A: I-94

On I-94 WB, the CIA shall be from approximately 2.41 miles (12,700 feet) east of 

POB to 0.40 miles (2,100 feet) west of POE. 

On I-94 EB, the CIA shall be from approximately 2.41 miles (12,700 feet) west of 

POB to 0.40 miles (2,100 feet) east of POE. 

On Ramps, the CIA shall be from approximately 0.21 miles (1,100 feet) prior to 

and after ramp on cross road. 

Location B: M-89 

On M-89, the CIA shall be from approximately 0.55 miles (2,900 feet) in advance 

of the POB to 0.55 miles (2,900 feet) beyond the POE. 

The CIA shall also include 150 feet in each direction on all intersecting roads 

within the work area:

Naomi Street (Rt) 

Fairlane Street (Lt) 

Prince Street (Rt) 

Michigan Avenue (Lt) 

Dwight Street (Rt) 

Prospect Avenue (Lt) 

Warrant Street (Rt) 

Cedar Street (Lt) 

Scott Street (Lt) 

Church Street (Rt) 

Bridge Street (Rt) 

Main Street (Rt & Lt) 

Anderson Street (Rt & Lt) 

Woodhams Street (Rt & Lt) 

Hicks Street (Rt). 

Location C: M-60 

On M-60, the CIA shall be from approximately 0.53 miles (2,800 feet) in advance 

of the POB and 0.53 miles (2,800 feet) beyond the POE. 

The CIA shall also include 150 feet in each direction on all intersecting roads 

within the work area:

Plainfield Dr (Rt) 

Locust Street (Rt & Lt) 

Greenwood Street (Rt) 

Railroad Street (Rt & Lt) 

Mill Street (Rt) 

Lake Street (Lt) 

Burr Oak Street (Lt) 

Portage Street (Lt) 

Nottawa Rd (Rt & Lt) 

East Street (Lt) 

Pleasant Street (Rt & Lt) 

Congress Street (Lt). 

Location D: I-196BL 

On I-196BL, the CIA shall be from approximately 0.53 miles (2,800 feet) in 

advance of the POB and 0.53 miles (2,800 feet) beyond the POE. 
SWR:DLL 3 of 18 04-21-08

 Location E: US-31 SB 

On US-31 SB, from approximately 1.73 miles (9,120 feet) north of POB to 0.27 

miles (1,400 feet) south of POE. 

Include in the CIA the rights-of-way of any intersecting roads and ramps adjacent to 

the work zone for a distance of approximately 700 feet in advance of ramps. 

d. Traffic Restrictions. 

1. Work or lane closures will not be allowed during the Memorial Day, July 4th, or 

Labor Day holiday periods, or as defined by the Engineer. All work shall be 

coordinated around local festivals. 

2. MAINLINE CLOSURES ON Location A: I-94 

A. Maintain two lanes of traffic on I-94 during the following hours: 

7:00 am to 7:00 pm Monday through Thursday 

7:00 am to 8:00 pm Friday 

9:00 am to 7:00 pm Saturday 

11:00 am to 9:00 pm Sunday 

B. A pay item for Ltg for Night Work has be included. 

C. Cold milling and paving operations shall be conducted on I-94 mainline 

Sunday through Thursday at night. The Contractor shall cold mill and pave 

one lane and a shoulder with a tapered overlapping centerline longitudinal 

joint on one night. Then the following night, the Contractor shall cold mill and 

pave the adjacent lane. When traffic is driving in a section of pavement with 

the tapered overlapping longitudinal centerline joint, the centerline taper shall 

have a solid 4 inch white painted line, and UNEVEN LANES signs (W8-11), 

DO NOT PASS signs (R4-1), and STAY IN LANE signs (R4-9). The signs 

shall be placed left and right at the beginning and at 0.5 mile intervals before 

both lanes open to traffic each day. 

D. HMA paving for I-94 mainline, acceleration lanes and deceleration lanes shall

only be constructed at night, Sunday through Thursday.

E. All signs and traffic control devices shall be taken down during the hours of 

the above lane restrictions pertaining to any lane closure or traffic shift 

according to the Special Provision for the “TEMPORARY REMOVAL OF 

PORTABLE SIGNS” (03SP812K). If the signs are up during the restricted 

hours the Contractor will pay liquidated damages of $ 350 for every 15 

minutes the signs are still up. 

6:00am

6:00am to 9:00pm

8:00am

noon

$333
SWR:DLL 4 of 18 04-21-08

3. Location B: M-89 in Plainwell 

A. Work at Location B shall start after July 20th, due to Plainwell’s Island Festival 

July 18th and July 19th.

B. Perform work during night hours only: 

7:00 PM and 6:00 AM Monday through Thursday 

8:00 PM Friday through 11:00 AM Saturday 

6:00 PM Saturday through 6:00 AM Monday. 

C. A pay item for Ltg for Night Work has been included.

D. Any Lane open to traffic shall have a minimum lane width of 11 feet. 

E. The maximum length for a traffic regulator operation shall be 0.87 miles 

(4,600 feet) or as approved by the Engineer. Signing for traffic regulator 

operation is shown in this proposal. 

F. During construction of the entire project, adjacent roads shall remain open to 

traffic at all times except as approved by the Engineer. Access to residences 

and commercial businesses shall be maintained at all times unless approved 

by the Engineer. 

G. A traffic regulator operation shall be utilized with a minimum of two traffic 

regulators. If necessary, intermediate traffic regulators shall be provided by 

the Contractor at intersecting roads to prevent conflicting traffic from entering 

the operation as approved by the Engineer. The cost of all traffic regulators 

shall be included in the pay item Flag Control. 

H. The work of a traffic regulator operation includes furnishing and operating the 

personnel and equipment for regulating moving traffic with traffic regulators 

and radio communication systems. Traffic regulators shall be equipped with 

two-way radios, stop/slow paddles, warning garments that are both 

fluorescent orange and reflectorized. Refer to the Michigan Manual on 

Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 6, for other requirements for the traffic 

regulator operation. 

I. Traffic regulators shall be trained as required and shall be conducted in a 

manner consistent with the methods in the “Traffic Regulators Instruction 

Manual”.
SWR:DLL 5 of 18 04-21-08

4. Location C: M-60 in Mendon 

A. Work at Location C, shall be completed prior to Mendon’s River Festival, on 

August 15th.

B. All work shall be restricted to daylight hours only. No work shall be done on 

Sundays unless approved by the Engineer. 

C. Any Lane open to traffic shall have a minimum lane width of 11 feet. 

D. The maximum length for a traffic regulator operation shall be 0.95 miles 

(5,000 feet) or as approved by the Engineer. Signing for traffic regulator 

operation is shown in this proposal. 

E. During construction of the entire project, adjacent roads shall remain open to 

traffic at all times except as approved by the Engineer. Access to residences 

and commercial businesses shall be maintained at all times unless approved 

by the Engineer. 

F. A traffic regulator operation shall be utilized with a minimum of two traffic 

regulators. If necessary, intermediate traffic regulators shall be provided by 

the Contractor at intersecting roads to prevent conflicting traffic from entering 

the operation as approved by the Engineer. The cost of all traffic regulators 

shall be included in the pay item Flag Control. 

G. The work of a traffic regulator operation includes furnishing and operating the 

personnel and equipment for regulating moving traffic with traffic regulators 

and radio communication systems. Traffic regulators shall be equipped with 

two-way radios, stop/slow paddles, warning garments that are both 

fluorescent orange and reflectorized. Refer to the Michigan Manual on 

Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 6, for other requirements for the traffic 

regulator operation. 

H. Traffic regulators shall be trained as required and shall be conducted in a 

manner consistent with the methods in the “Traffic Regulators Instruction 

Manual”.

5. Location D: I-196BL 

A. Work at Location D, shall be completed prior to/after the National Blueberry 

Festival, on August 7th-10th.

B. All work shall be restricted to daylight hours only. No work shall be done on 

Sundays unless approved by the Engineer. 
SWR:DLL 6 of 18 04-21-08

C. Any Lane open to traffic shall have a minimum lane width of 11 feet. 

D. The maximum length for a traffic regulator operation shall be 0.95 miles 

(5,000 feet) or as approved by the Engineer. Signing for traffic regulator 

operation is shown in this proposal. 

E. During construction of the entire project, adjacent roads shall remain open to 

traffic at all times except as approved by the Engineer. Access to residences 

and commercial businesses shall be maintained at all times unless approved 

by the Engineer. 

F. A traffic regulator operation shall be utilized with a minimum of two traffic 

regulators. If necessary, intermediate traffic regulators shall be provided by 

the Contractor at intersecting roads to prevent conflicting traffic from entering 

the operation as approved by the Engineer. The cost of all traffic regulators 

shall be included in the pay item Flag Control. 

G. The work of a traffic regulator operation includes furnishing and operating the 

personnel and equipment for regulating moving traffic with traffic regulators 

and radio communication systems. Traffic regulators shall be equipped with 

two-way radios, stop/slow paddles, warning garments that are both 

fluorescent orange and reflectorized. Refer to the Michigan Manual on 

Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Part 6, for other requirements for the traffic 

regulator operation. 

H. Traffic regulators shall be trained as required and shall be conducted in a 

manner consistent with the methods in the “Traffic Regulators Instruction 

Manual”.

6. Location E: US-31 Lane and Ramp Closures

A. The ramp detour will utilize the median turn around along US-12; traffic will be 

turned in the opposite bound and then use the alternate ramp to access US31 SB as shown in Log of Project Part 2. Traffic will be detour onto state 

trunkline routes. 

B. Detour routes will have detour guide signs, two portable changeable message 

board warning of the detour one week prior and messages during the detour. 

7. During the work (non-restricted hours) no more than 1 single lane closure and/or 

shoulder closures each of approximately 2.0 miles in length shall be permitted in 

each direction of travel. No more than 1 ramp/shoulder closure, each of 

approximately 2.0 miles in length shall be permitted for the daytime work. 

8. No lane closure sequences will be allowed where the Contractor can accomplish 
SWR:DLL 7 of 18 04-21-08

the work utilizing a shoulder closure. 

9. When utilizing a shoulder closure, the Contractor’s personnel and equipment 

shall not occupy any part of the active traffic lane. If this situation cannot be 

avoided, then a lane closure sequence shall be used. A 24 hour shoulder closure 

is allowed it the Contractor does not encroach on the active lanes. During a lane 

closure the Contractor may not have a shoulder closure opposite the lane 

closure.

10. Sign Covers shall be placed over existing regulatory, warning and construction 

signs that are not applicable during construction. 

11. Once work is initiated that includes any lane restrictions, that work shall be 

continuous until completed. A lack of work activity for more than (1) one week 

requires the removal and replacement of lane restrictions with all the costs borne 

by the Contractor. 

12. Restrict access for construction vehicles between traveled lanes and work areas 

to specific locations. The number of access points and their locations requires 

the approval of the Engineer. 

13. Transverse and longitudinal HMA tapers shall be provided at all grade changes 

caused by cold milling and overlays. All cold milled areas shall be paved the 

same day as the cold milling operation. No traffic shall be allowed on the cold 

milled surface, unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. 

d. Work Zone Speeds. 

1. Set work zone speeds according to the 2006 Guidelines to Establish Speed 

Limits in Work Zones. 

2. Post additional “WHERE WORKERS PRESENT 45” mph speed limit signs at 

one mile intervals throughout the work zone. 

e. Traffic Control Devices.

1. General. 

A. All traffic control devices and their usage shall conform to Part 6 of the 

Michigan Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). This 

document can be found at the following website: 

http://mdotwas1.mdot.state.mi.us/public/tands/plans.cfm

B. During non-working periods, place advance signs (W20-1 - "ROAD WORK 

AHEAD") and lighted plastic drums at any work site with uncompleted work as 

the Engineer directs. All costs associated with this work will be borne by the 

Contractor.
SWR:DLL 8 of 18 04-21-08

2. Temporary Signs. 

A. At all locations use temporary sign spacing and taper lengths as shall be as 

shown on attached Typical M0020a. 

B. Refer to Traffic and Safety Standard Plan WZD-125-D for portable supports.

C. Signing for the beginning and ending of the work zone shall be as shown on 

attached Typicals: 

 Location A & E: M0080a 

 Locations B, C, & D: M0050a 

D. Signing for traffic regulator operation shall be as shown on attached Typicals: 

Location B & C: M0140a MOD 

Location D: M0140a 

E. Signing for a one-lane shift within a lane closure on a freeway using a 

reduced speed shall be as shown on attached Typicals: 

Location A: M081b-MOD 1 

Location E: M081a MOD 

F. Signing for a one-lane closure on a freeway using a reduced speed limit 

where workers present shall be as shown on attached Typical: 

Locations A & E: M0990a 

G. Show signing for one-lane closure on roadway in advance of a gore area at a 

minor divergence using a reduced speed limit where workers present shall be 

as shown on attached Typical: 

Location A: M099e MOD 

H. Signing for a shoulder closure on an exit ramp using an advisory speed shall 

be as shown in attached Typicals: 

 Location A: M0940a or M0950a 

I. Signing for an entrance ramp to a mainline right lane closure shall be as 

shown on attached Typicals: 

 Location A: M081e-MOD 1 or M081e-MOD 2 

 Location E: M44BMOD 

J. Signing for a one-lane closure on a freeway with an exit ramp reducing speed 

limit where workers present shall be as shown on attached Typical: 

Location A: M0950a-MOD. 

K. Signing for a one-lane closure on a freeway with an entrance ramp reducing 

speed limit where workers present shall be as shown on attached Typicals: 

 Location A: M0960a-MOD 1 or M0960a-MOD 2
SWR:DLL 9 of 18 04-21-08

L. Signing for a typical entrance ramp treatment for a shoulder closure on an 

entrance ramp with no speed reduction shall be as shown on attached 

Typical:

Location A: M0960a 

M. Supplemental speed limit treatment on limited access roadways where 

workers are present shall be as shown on attached Typical: 

Location A: M0100a 

N. W20-1 (ROAD WORK AHEAD) signs in the quantities: 

Locations A, C, D & E: Place on ramps or intersecting roads in advance of 

construction areas as the Engineer directs. 

Location B: (ON M-89) (G20-Type) sign 150 feet in advance of the 

intersection with M-89 as directed by the Engineer and on the following: 

Naomi Street (Rt) 

Fairlane Street (Lt) 

Prince Street (Rt) 

Michigan Avenue (Lt) 

Dwight Street (Rt) 

Prospect Avenue (Lt) 

Warrant Street (Rt) 

Cedar Street (Lt) 

Scott Street (Lt) 

Church Street (Rt) 

Bridge Street (Rt) 

Main Street (Rt & Lt) 

Anderson Street (Rt & Lt) 

Woodhams Street (Rt & Lt) 

Hicks Street (Rt) 

Location C: (ON M-60) (G20-Type) sign 150 feet in advance of the 

intersection with M-60 as directed by the Engineer and on the following: 

Plainfield Drive (Rt) 

Locust Street (Rt & Lt) 

Greenwood Street (Rt) 

Railroad Street (Rt & Lt) 

Mill Street (Rt) 

Lake Street (Lt) 

Burr Oak Street (Lt) 

Portage Street (Lt) 

Nottawa Rd (Rt & Lt) 

East Street (Lt) 

Pleasant Street (Rt & Lt) 

Congress Street (Lt) 

O. Place at locations that the Engineer designates W20-15b (WATCH FOR 

TRAFFIC BACKUPS/BE PREPARED TO STOP) signs included in the 

quantities.

Location A: I-94 at the POB for westbound and the POB for eastbound, 5 

miles in advance of each CIA.
SWR:DLL 10 of 18 04-21-08

P. Place SF-1: 

Location A: (ON I-94) signs, included in the quantities, shall be placed with 

the W20-15b (WATCH FOR TRAFFIC BACKUPS/BE PREPARED TO 

STOP) signs. 

Location D: (ON I-196BL) signs, included in the quantities 

Location E: (ON US-31) and (ON SB US-31) signs, included in the 

quantities

Q. Place W8-11 (UNEVEN LANES) signs, included in the quantities, every onehalf mile during paving operations described on Page 3, 2.B.MAINLINE 

CLOSURES ON I-94 or as directed by the Engineer. 

R. Place R4-1 (DO NOT PASS) signs, included in the quantities, every one-half 

mile during paving operations described on Page 3, 2.B.MAINLINE 

CLOSURES ON I-94 or as directed by the Engineer. 

S. Place R4-9 (STAY IN LANE) signs, included in the quantities, every one-half 

mile during paving operations described on Page 3, 2.B.MAINLINE 

CLOSURES ON I-94 or as directed by the Engineer. 

T. Custom signs, (RUMBLE STRIPS) and (ATTENTION MOTORCYCLISTS) 

signs, included in the quantities to be placed, during the lead in sign 

sequence when traffic is shifted. These signs will be placed on both sides of 

the roadway. 

U. Place a R8-3A (NO PARKING) sign and cover existing PARKING signs when 

working in the existing parking areas on Location C. 

V. Consider distances shown between construction warning, regulatory and 

guide signs shown on the typicals as approximate. Signs may require field 

adjustment, as the Engineer directs. 

W.Construct all temporary signs with legends and symbols flush to the signs face 

and do not extend beyond the sign borders or edges. 

X. Refer to Traffic and Safety Standard Plan WZD-125-D when installing 

temporary diamond signs with portable supports. Note that the Type A 

Warning Light is required. 

Y. When a portable construction sign is no longer applicable, remove it or lay it 

down on its non-reflective side with its feet off. Refer to Special Provision for 

“TEMPORARY REMOVAL OF PORTABLE SIGNS.” (03SP812K) 

Z. Two (2) Portable Changeable Message Signs (PCMS) to warn traffic of 

upcoming work and changing traffic control shall be used during the life of the 

project. Install and make operational a minimum of seven (7) calendar days 
SWR:DLL 11 of 18 04-21-08

prior to the start of work and secure by elevating the tires above the ground or 

through the use of wheel chocks or sandbags. Obtain approval from the 

Engineer for all sign locations and all messages placed on the sign prior to 

displaying the message. Use on Locations A & E. 

Location A: 

Advance Notice for Road Work Notice for Road Work 

 Seq 1 Seq 2 Seq 1 

Location E: 

Notice for Road Work 

 Seq 1 Seq 2 

AA.Use Type C Lighted Arrows (min 48 inch x 98 inch) to merge traffic and 

secure by elevating the tires no more than three (3) inches above the ground, 

or through the of wheel chocks or sandbags that are no higher than twelve 

(12) inches above the ground.

BB.The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires all signs to be NCHRP 

350 crashworthy. For design and configuration refer to their website: 

http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/road_hardware/workzone_pdmenu.cfm

CC.All temporary signs that will be in place for more than 14 days shall be 

mounted on driven posts. Ground driven sign supports shall be as shown on 

attached Figure WZD-100-A. Refer to Standard Plan WZD-125-D for portable 

supports.

3. Permanent Signs 

A. Any signs that are damaged during construction by the Contractor shall be 

replaced at the Contractor’s expense. 

4. Channelizing Devices. 

A. Use lighted plastic drums with high intensity sheeting for required 

channelizing devices on Location A, D, & E as approved by the Engineer. 

B. 42 Inch Channelizing Devices shall be used as specified in the Special 

ROAD WRK 

BEGINS

(DATE)

NIGHT WK 

WILL BE 

UTILIZED

NIGHT

LANE

CLOSURES 

RAMP

DETOUR

AHEAD

US-31SB

TURN

LEFT
SWR:DLL 12 of 18 04-21-08

Provision, and as approved by the Engineer on Locations B & C. 

C. Use high intensity plastic drums to delineate the edgelines of right shoulders 

exceeding six (6) foot in width until the edgelines are painted. Use high 

intensity plastic drums to delineate all left shoulder edgelines regardless of 

width until the edgelines are painted. 

D. Lighted plastic drums shall be placed for the WHOLE length of the project on 

BOTH sides of the roadway on Location A: I-94 WB and EB. Lighted plastic 

drums shall be dragged, all the way out to the edge of the shoulders on areas 

where no work is utilized. Drums shall not be dragged across live lanes of 

traffic on a routine basis. 

F. Channelizing devices shall be placed as described in the Special Provision for 

42 inch Channelizing Devices. Payment shall be included in the pay items 

“Channelizing Device, 42 inch, Oper” and “Channelizing Device, 42 inch, 

Furn” (Ea) on Locations B & C. 

G Use two (2) eight-foot Barricade, Type III, High Intensity, Lighted to block off 

ends of work zone during Ramp closure on Location E: US-31 (SB). 

5. Temporary Pavement Markings. 

A. Temporary pavement markings shall consist of: 

Pavt Mrkg, Type NR, Paint, 4 inch, White, Temp

Pavt Mrkg, Type NR, Paint, 4 inch, Yellow, Temp 

Pavt Mrkg, Type R, 4 inch, White, Temp

Pavt Mrkg, Type R, 4 inch, Yellow, Temp

Pavt Mrkg, Type R, 6 inch, Black, Temp 

Pavt Mrkg, Type R, 6 inch, Gray, Temp 

B. The Contractor shall place temporary pavement markings, Type R, 6 inch, 

Black/Gray, Temp to cover the skip lines in the night time lane closure tapers. 

This tape shall be removed prior to opening the lane to traffic. The Contractor 

shall be responsible to ensure that all temporary pavement markings adhere 

to the pavement surface until permanent markings are installed. All cost for 

any additional adhesives or other materials is included with these Pay Items. 

C. Place temporary pavement markings, Type NR, at locations on pavement 

areas that are removed or covered during construction for interim traffic 

control as the Engineer specifies. 

D. During paving operations, base quantities for temporary paint placed on four 

(4)-inch strips, four (4)-feet long, spaced at 50 feet center to center for lane 

lines and centerline.

E. The Contractor shall place temporary pavement marking, type NR paint, 4 

inch white and 4 inch yellow, as stated in the proposal and as directed by the 
SWR:DLL 13 of 18 04-21-08

Engineer.

F. On Location A: I-94, during the paving operation, when the lap joint will be 

exposed to traffic, the Contractor SHALL place a solid white lane line on the 

tapered portion of the joint in addition to the solid white edge line. Within the 

following work period, after the Contractor has paved the adjacent lane even 

to previous paving length, place dashed white lane and four (4) foot strips on 

fifty (50) foot centers, to delineate the center line, in addition to the solid 

yellow edge line.

G. On Location A: I-94, the Contractor shall place temporary pavement 

markings, Type NR paint, 4 inch white at four (4) foot skips on fifty (50) foot 

centers, to delineate the center line, prior to opening to traffic, at the end of 

EACH work night.

H. On Location A: I-94, the Contractor shall place Temporary Paint (Type NR 

paint, 4 inch, White and 4 inch, Yellow) to delineate the edge of the roadway 

lanes after each HMA course at the end of EACH working night, prior to 

opening to traffic. 

I. Any additional adhesives or other materials used shall be includes with these 

pay items. 

J. All required temporary pavement markings shall be placed at the end of each 

work shift. 

K. Pavt Mrkg, Type NR, Paint, 4 inch, Yellow, Temp shall be placed on 

centerline at 4 ft skips at 50 ft intervals and Pavt Mrkg, Type NR, Paint, 4 

inch, White, Temp shall be placed on lane lines at 4 ft skips at 50 ft intervals 

on the milled and paved surface, allowing for a tolerance of 4 inch +/- (center 

to center) between temporary and permanent markings.

L. Temporary markings which are installed outside the specified lateral tolerance 

shall be removed, as directed by the Engineer, at the Contractor’s expense. 

6. Permanent Pavement Markings. 

A. Permanent pavement markings consist of the following: 

On Locations A, B, C, D, & E: 

4 inch white waterborne for lane lines 

6 inch white and 6 inch yellow waterborne for edge lines 

6 inch white and 6 inch yellow waterborne on ramps 

12 inch white (gore) waterborne on ramps 

B. All permanent pavement markings shall conform to MDOT Pavement Marking 

Typicals PAVE-900 through PAVE-990. 

C. The Contractor is responsible for verifying the existing pavement marking 
SWR:DLL 14 of 18 04-21-08

locations and patterns. Replace the pavement markings as they existed prior 

to construction, unless otherwise directed by the Engineer. 

f. Measurement and Payment. The estimate of quantities for maintaining traffic is 

based on signing and related traffic control devices for 1 shoulder closure, 1 single 

lane closure, 1 ramp closure & detour, 2 Portable Changeable Message Signs, and 

10 "ROAD WORK AHEAD" (W20-1) signs. 2 "WATCH FOR TRAFFIC 

BACKUPS/BE PREPARED TO STOP" signs, 2 “UNEVEN LANES” signs, 2 “STAY 

IN LANE” signs, and 1 Traffic Regulator Operation. This estimate also includes a 

maximum of 2 Type C lighted arrows (min 48in by 96in) to be in use at any one time.

1. Measure and pay for all traffic control items in accordance with Section 812.04 of 

the Standard Specifications of Construction.

2. Payment for temporary signs will be made based on the maximum square foot of 

dissimilar sign legends in use at any Location A thru E, the Contractor is 

responsible to move all signs at no extra cost to Maintaining of traffic.

3. All cost of additional signing or maintaining traffic devices required to expedite 

the construction shall be borne by the Contractor. 

ESTIMATE OF TEMPORARY SIGN QUANTITIES

(For Information Only) 

SIGN, TYPE A,TEMPORARY, PRISMATIC:

SIGN MESSAGE QTY. IN. x IN. FT2

R1-2 YIELD 4 48 x 48 32 

Subtotal, Sign, Type A, Temporary, Prismatic, Furn: Ft2 32
SWR:DLL 15 of 18 04-21-08

ESTIMATE OF TEMPORARY SIGN QUANTITIES CONTINUED:

(For Information Only) 

SIGN, TYPE B, TEMPORARY, PRISMATIC: 

SIGN MESSAGE QTY. IN. x IN. FT2

SF-1 ON I-94 4 50 x 18 25

G20-TYPE ON M-89 18 48 x 12 

72

G20-TYPE ON M-60 16 48 x 12 

64

SF-1 ON I-196BL 4 50 x 18 25

SF-1 ON US-31 2 50 x 18 13

SF-1 ON SB US-31 1 50 x 18 6

W20-15b WATCH FOR TRAFFIC 

BACKUPS/BE PREPARED 

TO STOP 

2 96 x 72 96 

R5-18b INJURE/KILL A 

WORKER

$7500 + 15 YEARS 

4 48 x 60 80 

R5-18 TRAFFIC FINES DOUBLED 

IN WORK ZONES 

2 48 x 60 40 

W20-1 ROAD WORK AHEAD 18 48 x 48 288 

W20-1 (MOD) RAMP WORK AHEAD 4 48 x 48 64 

W20-4 ONE LANE ROAD AHEAD 2 48 x 48 32 

W20-7a Traffic Regulator Symbol 2 48 x 48 32 

W20-15 BE PREPARED TO STOP 2 48 x 48 32 

W4-2L Lane Merge Left Symbol 2 48 x 48 32 

W4-2R Lane Merge Right Symbol 2 48 x 48 32 

R5-18c WORK ZONE BEGINS 4 48 x 48 64 

W1-4L Reverse Curve Symbol 2 48 x 48 32 

W1-4R Reverse Curve Symbol 2 48 x 48 32 

W1-4bR Reverse Curve Symbol, 2 or 

more Lanes 

2 48 x 48 32 

W1-4bL Reverse Curve Symbol, 2 or 

more Lanes 

2 48 x 48 32 

W1-6L One Directional Arrow Symbol 3 48 x 24 24 

W1-6R One Directional Arrow Symbol 3 48 x 24 24 
SWR:DLL 16 of 18 04-21-08

ESTIMATE OF TEMPORARY SIGN QUANTITIES CONTINUED:

(For Information Only) 

SIGN, TYPE B, TEMPORARY, PRISMATIC: 

SIGN MESSAGE QTY. IN. x IN. FT2

W3-2a Yield Ahead Symbol 4 48 x 48 64 

W4-1 Merge Symbol 2 48 x 48 32 

W4-3 Through Lane and Ramp 

Merge Symbol 

2 48 x 48 32 

W20-2 DETOUR AHEAD 1 48 x 48 16 

W20-5R

(MOD)

RIGHT LANE CLOSED 

AHEAD

2 48 x 48 32 

W20-5L

(MOD)

LEFT LANE CLOSED AHEAD 2 48 x 48 32 

W21-4 RAMP CLOSED AHEAD 2 48 x 48 32 

R11-2 RAMP CLOSED 2 48 x 30 20 

W21-5bL LEFT SHOULDER CLOSED 

AHEAD

2 48 x 48 32 

W21-5bR RIGHT SHOULDER CLOSED 

AHEAD

2 48 x 48 32 

W21-5aR RIGHT SHOULDER CLOSED 2 48 x 48 32 

W21-5aL LEFT SHOULDER CLOSED 2 48 x 48 32 

W20-1a NEXT __ MILES 2 48 x 36 24 

W3-5b REDUCED SPEED ZONE 

AHEAD

2 48 x 48 32 

E5-1 EXIT Arrow 2 48 x 48 32

E5-2 Exit Number Symbol 2 24 x 24 8

R2-1 SPEED LIMIT 30 2 48 x 60 40

R2-1 SPEED LIMIT 35 2 48 x 60 40

R2-1 SPEED LIMIT 40 4 48 x 60 80

R2-1 SPEED LIMIT 60 12 48 x 60 240 

W11-16 WATCH FOR RAMP TRAFFIC 2 48 x 48 32 

R2-1a WHERE WORKERS 

PRESENT 45 

10 48 x 60 200 

W8-11 UNEVEN LANES 2 48 x 48 32 

CUSTOM RUMBLE 

 STRIPS 

2 48 x 48 32 

CUSTOM ATTENTION 

MOTORISTS 

2 66 x 24 22 
SWR:DLL 17 of 18 04-21-08

ESTIMATE OF TEMPORARY SIGN QUANTITIES CONTINUED:

(For Information Only) 

SIGN, TYPE B, TEMPORARY, PRISMATIC:

SIGN MESSAGE QTY. IN. x IN. FT2

R4-1 DO NOT PASS 2 48 x 60 40 

R4-9 STAY IN LANE 2 48 x 60 40 

R2-1 SPEED LIMIT 70 2 48 x 60 40 

R8-3a NO PARKING 9 24 x 24 36 

M1-4 Interstate Route Marker (31) 7 24 x 24 28 

M3-3 SOUTH 7 24 x 12 14 

M4-8 DETOUR 6 24 x 12 12 

M-4-8a DETOUR ENDS 1 24 x 18 3 

M5-1aL Up and Left Arrow 1 21 x 15 2 

M6-1aL Left Arrow 2 21 x 15 4 

M6-3a Up Arrow 2 21 x 15 4 

M6-2aR Diagonal Right Arrow 1 21 x 15 2 

G20-2 END ROAD WORK 2 48 x 24 16 

Subtotal, Sign, Type B, Temporary, Prismatic, Furn: Ft2 1020
5.5 8

4.1 12.9 8 20.9 4.1

4.5

18

50

1.5" Radius, 0.8" Border, 0.4" Indent, Black on Orange; 

“ON I-94” D; 

4.1

11.6

25.0

28.1

33.140.0

O N I -9 4

- 1
4.5 6

16.1 33.8

3 6

6.3 53.4

16.1

6.3

4.5

24

66

1.6" Radius, 0.9" Border, 0.6" Indent, Black on Orange; 

“ATTENTION” C; “MOTORCYCLISTS” C; 

25 8

15.8 34.4

4.5 8

18.9 28.2

16.3

19.4

21

66.5

66.5

48.0" across sides 1.6" Radius, 0.9" Border, 0.6" Indent, Black on Orange; 

“RUMBLE” C; “STRIPS” C 75‰ spacing; 

R M

R

O

MO OR
16.2 7

20.2 25

6 7

20.1 25.2

6 7

17.4 30.6

20.2

20.1

17.4

16.2

65.4

65.4

48.0" across sides 3.0" Radius, 1.3" Border, 0.8" Indent, Black on Orange; 

“RAMP” D; “WORK” D; “AHEAD” D; 

Table of letter and object lefts.

20.2 26.2 33.4 40.5

20.1

O

27.6 34.1 40.5

17.4 24.6 30.9 36.1 43.3

O

- O
9 6

6.2 11.6 6.2

9

24

24

1.5" Radius, 0.5" Border, Black on Orange; 

“XX” E; 

6.2

12.6

E5-2
4.1 8

4.1 27.7

6 13.8

8.1 19.8

4.2

8.1

4.1

36

36

3.0" Radius, 0.8" Border, 0.8" Indent, Black on Orange; 

“EXIT” ClearviewHwy-6-W; Arrow B-13 - 21.5" 30°; 

4.1

11.6

21.4

25.7

8.1


























F.Design Plans/Typical 

Shoulders will be paved wider for a 2-3 foot paved

shoulder while maintaining traffic,
Shoulders will be paved wider for a 2-3 foot paved

shoulder while maintaining traffic,


PCMB's

2

2













G. Safety and Mobility Peer Team Review 
DATE: May 9, 2008 

To Brett Xxxx1

Manager

TSC

FROM: Greg Xxxx 

Statewide Operations Engineer 

Operations Division 

SUBJECT: Safety and Mobility Peer Team Review (Statewide) 

Transportation management Plan (TMP) Submittals 

The May 2008 SPRT review of 2009 projects has been completed. Included with this memo is a copy of 

the completed review form(s) for each project listed below submitted by your office. Please review these 

forms and take any appropriate actions to enhance your projects. 

Proiect CS Project JN Status

13082 103063 Green 

13082,13083 75047,102807 Green 

13082, 13083, 13073 74956,81723 Green

If your project(s) was rated as green, feedback to my office is not necessary. Please thoroughly consider 

any suggestions/comments on the review forms and file the review forms in the project files. 

If your project(s) was rated as yellow, feedback to my office is required. Please thoroughly consider any 

suggestions/comments and provide feedback on what safety and mobility items were implemented in your 

respective TMP(s) based on the SPRT review. This information will be compiled and provided to MDOT 

Executive Staff and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 

If your project(s) was rated as red, re-submittal of the TMP to this office is required. Please address all 

critical issues and resubmit a revised TMP within the next 30 days. 

If you have any questions or concerns with the review of your project(s), the review process or with this 

memorandum please contact me at your earliest convenience at 517-636-0463. 

Statewide Operations Engineer

Attachment 

cc: Richard Xxxx 

Jason Xxxxx 

James Xxxx 

1

 Team member information is omitted 
Safety and Mobility Peer Team (SMPT) Review 

Project Identification Control Section: 1308 & 13083 Job Number: 75047 & 102807 Route: I-94 

 Location I-94 EB & WB from Helmer Road to 61/2 Mile Road 

Work Description Replacement of two bridges over Riverside Drive. 

CPM COLDMILL and HMA Overlay 

Contact Name: Jason Xxxxx Phone: 555-555-5555 

Review Team Members Bill Xxxx, Bruhat Xxxxx, Heather Xxxx, Bil Xxxx, Dean Xxx, Sean Xxxxxxx 

 Review Date: 05/06/08

Operational Parameters V/C LOS Average Delay (Minutes) 

Existing 0.9, 0.9, 0.75 D, E, C N/A

Work Zone 1.13, 1.57, 1.41 E, E, E 0.9, 1.4, 1.4 

TMP Package Complete X YES NO X TTC

Let Date October 3, 2008 X TOP 

Construction Start Date April 13, 2009 X PIP

Construction End Date May 30, 2010 X Vicinity Map

SMPT Recommendation 

Red Light: Not OK to Proceed

Review SPRT Comments; 

Region Engineer to Discuss with COO 

 Yellow Light: OK to Proceed 

Review SPRT Comments; Region/TSC 

Incorporate Changes As Appropriate 

SMPT Summary Comments: 

X Green Light: OK to Proceed 

Traffic Mobility Analysis 

Item Comments 

X YES

NO

Traffic data source(s) is appropriate and reasonable 

X YES

NO

Traffic analysis methodology is appropriate and 

reasonable for the scope/complexity of the job location. 

The results are clear and understandable 

X YES

NO

The delay assumptions and calculations are reasonable 

and the approach is consistent with current practice and 

policy
Temporary Traffic Control 

Item Comments 

X YES

NO

The TTC concept seems responsible and logical given 

the type of work, the system level, the duration of the 

project, and the traffic volumes 

X YES

NO

Staging and constructability is well thought out and 

seems responsible. 

X YES

NO

There is evidence of analysis with respect to similar 

projects and job specific characteristics (shy distance, 

slopes, attenuation, and horizontal/vertical sight 

distances); the work zone is designed accordingly. 

X YES

NO

There is analysis of the alternatives considered, with an 

appropriate comparison of benefits and costs. 

What is cost of widening 

bridge structure vs. user delay 

cost for one lane operation? 

X YES

NO

There is a work zone crash analysis and comparison to 

crash statistics for similar project types/locations. There 

are no elements of unacceptable risk for the public or 

highway workers. 

Nice to see crash analysis 

included with packet 

X YES

NO

There is guidance on the development of an internal 

work zone (contractor’s operation) traffic control plan 

for contractor ingress and egress. 

X YES

NO

There is an appropriate plan to monitor safety and 

mobility and adjust the work zone/project during 

construction as needed. 

Transportation Operations 

Item Comments 

X YES

NO

TOP is complete and reasonable. It includes necessary 

provisions for pedestrians, emergency response, 

commercial vehicles, transit operations, etc., if necessary 

X YES

NO

Delay mitigation techniques are evident and are applied 

appropriately. Are there any techniques that you would 

recommend be added to the project at this stage that the 

Region/TSC should consider? 

No additional techniques are 

recommended 

X YES

NO

If applicable, is there adequate discussion of projects 

packaged or bundled with this project, an explanation of 

mobility influences beyond the project area? 

N/A

Public Information Plan 

X YES

NO

The Public Information Plan is appropriate for the scope 

of the Project 
General TMP Comments 

X YES

NO

These are best practices in the area of mobility analysis, 

mitigation techniques, TTCP or TOP development 

evident in this TMP that should be shared with others. 

YES

X NO

These are recommended areas of focus for further review 

by the Region/TSC 

YES

X NO

There are areas of concern that the team feels should be 

documented for review by either the Region Engineer or 

Chief Operations Officer 

www.fhwa.dot.gov/workzones

Office of Transportation Operations 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

FHWA-HOP-11-003