alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1709.120 Evaluation of applications. ( a ) The Agency will establish one or more rating panels to review and rate the grant applications. The panels may include persons not employed by the Agency.
( b ) All timely and complete applications that meet the eligibility requirements will be referred to the rating panel. The rating panel will evaluate and rate all referred applications according to the evaluation criteria and weights established in the grant announcement. Panel members may make recommendations for conditions on grant awards to promote successful performance of the grant or to assure compliance with other Federal requirements.
( c ) After the rating panel has evaluated and scored all proposals, in accordance with the point allocation specified in the grant announcement, the panel will prepare a list of all applications in rank order, together with funding level recommendations and recommendations for conditions, if any.
( d ) The list of ranked projects and rating panel recommendations will be forwarded to the Administrator for review and selection.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Annual report**** 
SuDocNumber:I1.117/2:
ItemNumber:0603-B-06(online)
CGPsystem Number:000589306
 
2003
2004
 **
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Our Revolution      

# Our Revolution

Developed by the Idaho Coalition Against Sexual & Domestic Violence, the Our Revolution campaign engages young people in a social movement to prevent and reduce teen dating violence. The Our Revolution website provides information and resources, including posters, brochures, and a conversation guide, that can help youth-serving professionals engage youth in the campaign

http://ncfy.acf.hhs.gov/news/2014/02/new-guide-can-help-you-get-teens-involved-preventing-dating-violence?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ncfynews
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                 5
       

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                            DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                              NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                                     4,864,900
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              3,170,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 300,000
<INVENTORY>                                                3,617,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          14,396,900
<PP&E>                                                     9,033,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                             5,875,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            17,689,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      7,873,600
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                     465,500
<OTHER-SE>                                                11,154,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              17,689,200
<SALES>                                                   43,057,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          43,057,300
<CGS>                                                     37,363,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             37,363,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           992,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (9,802,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   9,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (9,811,900)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (2.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0
        


<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 176 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 176

  To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile service 
                     through the Lifeline program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2013

   Mr. Griffin of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit universal service support of commercial mobile service 
                     through the Lifeline program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Taxpayer Funded Cell Phones Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIFELINE SUPPORT FOR COMMERCIAL MOBILE SERVICE.

    (a) In General.--A provider of commercial mobile service may not 
receive universal service support under sections 214(e) and 254 of the 
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 214(e); 254) for the provision of 
such service through the Lifeline program of the Federal Communications 
Commission.
    (b) Commercial Mobile Service Defined.--In this section, the term 
``commercial mobile service'' has the meaning given such term in 
section 332(d)(1) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 
332(d)(1)).
                                 <all>
```
§ 1737.80 Description of characteristics letter. ( a ) After all of the studies and exhibits for the proposed loan have been prepared, but before the loan is recommended, RUS shall inform the borrower, in writing, of the characteristics of the proposed loan. The purpose of the characteristics letter is to inform the borrower and obtain its concurrence, before further consideration by RUS of the loan approval and the preparation of legal documents relating to the loan, in such matters as the amount of the proposed loan, its purposes, rate of interest, loan security requirements, and other prerequisites to the advance of loan funds. The letter, whether or not concurred in by the borrower, does not commit RUS to approve the loan on these or any other terms.
( b ) The Forecast of Revenues and Expenses and a copy of RUS Form 493, “Telephone Loan Budget,” shall be enclosed with the characteristics letter. This copy of the budget shall be subject to change by RUS with the borrower's agreement.
[54 FR 13356, Apr. 3, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39396, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 26600, June 10, 1991]
Editorial Note on Part 1940
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1940 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1940.560 Guarantee Rural Rental Housing Program. When funding levels are under $100,000,000, all funds will be held in a National Office reserve and made available administratively in accordance with the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) and program regulations. When program levels are sufficient for a nationwide program, funds are allocated based upon the following criteria and weights. ( a ) *Amount available for allocations.* See § 1940.552(a) of this subpart.
( b ) *Basic formula criteria, data source and weight.* See § 1940.552(b) of this subpart . Each factor will receive a weight respectively of 40%, 40% and 20%. The criteria used in the basic formula are: ( 1 ) State's percentage of National rural population,
( 2 ) State's percentage of the National number of rural households between 50 and 115 percent of the area median income, and
( 3 ) State's percentage of National average cost per unit. The data source for the criterion specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section is the most recent decennial Census of the United States (decennial Census). The data source for the criterion specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section is 5-year income data from the American Community Survey (ACS) or, if needed, other Census Bureau data. The data source for the criterion specified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section is the cost per unit data using the applicable maximum per unit dollar amount limitations under section 207(c) of the National Housing Act, which can be obtained from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The percentage representing each criterion is multiplied by the weight assigned and totaled to arrive at a State factor. State Factor = (criterion No. 1 × weight of 40%) + (criterion No. 1 × weight of 40%) + (criterion No. 1 × weight of 20%)
( c ) *Basic formula allocation.* See § 1940.552(c).
( d ) *Transition formula.* See § 1940.552(d).
( e ) *Base allocation.* See § 1940.552(e). Jurisdictions receiving administrative allocations do not receive base allocations.
( f ) *Administrative allocations.* See § 1940.552(f). Jurisdictions receiving formula allocations do not receive administrative allocations.
( g ) *Reserve.* See § 1940.552(g).
( h ) *Pooling of funds.* See § 1940.552(h).
( i ) *Availability of the allocation.* See § 1940.552(i).
( j ) *Suballocation by the State Director.* See § 1940.552(j).
( k ) *Other documentation.* Not applicable.
[63 FR 39458, July 22, 1998, as amended at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015]
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED UNDER §302.12

BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

)

In The Matter of )

)

)

Agreement Adopted by the )

Passenger Services Conference )

Of the International Air )

Transport Association as)

Resolution 787 )

----------)

Docket No. OST-2013-0048

MOTION OF SABRE INC. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT

Sabre Inc. ("Sabre") hereby requests confidential treatment under §302.12 for the

that section of the attached Answer appearing under the heading, "Sabre Future (in

2013 and by end of 2014) Merchandizing Capabilities" found at pages 14-15 of the

Answer and for slide numbers 28-43 of the Exhibit 1 that accompanies the Answer.

The material for which Sabre requests confidential treatment will be very useful

for the Department to evaluate assertions about the imminent merchandizing

capabilities of Sabre on behalf of Sabre-participating carriers. However, public

disclosure of Sabre's future technology plans that will be implemented later in 2013 and

in 2014 would cause Sabre substantial commercial harm. Such disclosure would

enable Sabre's competitors to copy early on Sabre's plans and thus would deprive

Sabre of the rightful first-mover advantages that should flow from its innovations.

The limited material in the Answer and Exhibit 1 for which Sabre seeks

confidential treatment are trade secrets and commercial information of Sabre's that is

confidential. That material is therefore exempt from disclosure under 5 U.S.C. §

1
552(b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act. Nor is the disclosure of these trade

secrets and confidential information of Sabre's required in any way in the interest of the

public.

Sabre would accept access to these confidential materials for representative of

parties interested in this proceeding upon their execution of the customary nondisclosure agreements.

Respectfully submitted,

~Il~

David A. Schwarte

Special Counsel for Sabre Inc.

May 1,2013

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

V.A.P.,

Petitioner

v.

J.K.H.-G. AND CYS,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 223 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted July 25, 2008 ∗

Decided July 29 , 2008



### Before

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK

, Chief Judge

M ICHAEL S. K ANNE

, Circuit Judge

D IANE P. W OOD

, Circuit Judge



### No

. 07

- 3255

D ANIEL F ONTUS

, Petitioner

,

v.

M ICHAEL B. M UKASEY

, Attorney General of the

United States

, Respondent

. Petition for Review of an

Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

No. A73

- 033

- 399

Order

Four months after the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed a n order requiring Daniel Fontus ’ s removal to his native Haiti, he filed a motion to reopen. The motion argued that Fon tus would be persecuted should he return to Haiti, and that he therefore is entitled to asylum or withholding of removal. The Board denied this motion as untimely (the limit is three months). Although a motion may be submitted

∗ After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is
unnecessary. Se e Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f). NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 07

- 3255 Page 2

beyond three months if countr y conditions have deteriorated materially, the Board observed that Fontus does not argue that country conditions have chan ged since the

time of the Board ’ s initial decision or his hearing before an immigration judge.

Fontus argues in this court that the B oard abused its discretion by denying his motion to reopen. Claims of abuse of discretion in dealing with motions t o reopen are outside this court ’ s jurisdiction. Kucana v. Mukasey , No. 07

- 1002 (7th Cir. July 7, 2008); Li Fang Huang v. Mukasey , No. 07

- 2961 (7th Cir. July 15, 2008).

Fontus also argues that the Board violated the due process clause by refusing to allow him to seek asylum. Constitutional contentions are within our jurisdiction. 8

U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). But an opportunity for a hearing was pro vided. Fontus could have applied for asylum years ago: he entered the United States in 1993 but did not raise the possibility of asylum until 2007, after the order of removal had become final. No case holds that the Constitution requires the agency to ente rtain belated claims by aliens who had, but did not use, ample opportunity to seek asylum and withholding of

removal. Fontus ’ s constitutional argument is frivolous, nothing but the abuse

- of

discretion argument with different verbiage.

The petition for rev iew is denied to the extent it asserts that the Board violated the Constitution and otherwise is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
null

424.2441
Editorial Note on Part 1951
Editorial Notes: 1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1951.263 Graduation of non-Farm Credit programs borrowers. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *The thorough review.* Borrowers are required to supply such financial information as the Agency deems necessary to determine whether they are able to graduate to other credit. At a minimum, the financial statements requested from the borrower must include a balance sheet and a statement of income and expenses. Ordinarily, the financial statements will be those normally required at the end of the particular borrower's fiscal year. For borrowers who are not requested to furnish audited financial statements, the balance sheet and statement of income and expenses may be of the borrower's own format if the borrower's financial situation is accurately reflected. The borrower has 60 days for group type loans and 30 days for individual type loans to supply the financial information requested.
( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) *Requesting the borrower to graduate.* ( 1 ) The Agency will send written notice to borrowers found able to graduate requesting them to graduate. The borrower must seek a loan only in the amount necessary to repay the unpaid balance.
( 2 ) Borrowers must provide evidence of their ability or inability to graduate within 30 days for RH borrowers, and 90 days for group type borrowers, after the date of the request. The Agency may allow additional time for good cause, for example when a borrower expects to receive income in the near future for the payment of accounts which would substantially reduce the amount required for refinancing, or when a borrower is a public body and must issue bonds to accomplish graduation.
( 3 ) If a borrower is unable to graduate the full amount of the loan, the borrower must furnish evidence to the Agency, showing: ( i ) The names of other lenders contacted;
( ii ) The amount of loan requested by the borrower and the amount, if any, offered by the lenders;
( iii ) The rates and terms offered by the lenders or the specific reasons why other credit is not available; and
( iv ) The purpose of the loan request.
( 4 ) The difference in interest rates between the Agency and other lenders will not be sufficient reason for failure to graduate if the other credit is available at rates and terms which the borrower can reasonably be expected to pay. An exception is made where there is an interest rate ceiling imposed by Federal law or contained in the note or mortgage.
( 5 ) The Agency will notify the borrower in writing if it determines that the borrower can graduate. The borrower must take positive steps to graduate within 15 days for individual loans and 60 days for group loans from such notice to avoid legal action. The servicing official may grant a longer period where warranted.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1918 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1918

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the tax on beer to 
              its pre-1991 level, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2013

Mr. Latham (for himself, Mr. Kind, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Marino, Mr. 
Hinojosa, Mr. Dent, Mr. Holt, Mr. Loebsack, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Bishop of 
Georgia, Mr. Clay, Mr. Bonner, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, Mr. 
 Hastings of Florida, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Roskam, Mr. Schrader, 
    Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Gardner, Mrs. 
 Napolitano, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Graves of 
Missouri, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Griffin of Arkansas, Ms. Moore, Mr. Polis, 
Mr. Simpson, Mr. Bishop of New York, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Long, Mr. Lance, 
 and Mr. Massie) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the tax on beer to 
              its pre-1991 level, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Brewers Excise and Economic Relief 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF 1990 TAX INCREASE ON BEER.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 5051(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to imposition and rate of tax on beer) 
is amended by striking ``$18'' and inserting ``$9''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. TAX RELIEF FOR SMALL BREWERIES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 5051(a)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to a reduced rate of tax for 
certain domestic production) is amended by striking ``shall be'' and 
all that follows and inserting ``shall be--
                    ``(i) 0 on the first 15,000 barrels of beer which 
                are removed in such year for consumption or sale and 
                which have been brewed or produced by such brewer at 
                qualified breweries in the United States, and
                    ``(ii) $3.50 on so much of such beer as exceeds 
                15,000 barrels but does not exceed 60,000 barrels.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subparagraph (B) of such section is 
amended by striking ``the 60,000 barrel quantity'' and inserting ``the 
15,000 and 60,000 barrel quantities''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to calendar years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### SPRAGUE, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by John T. Sprague against the i city of New York and the department of health of the city of New York.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.