alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Frederick Deutsch et al., Plaintiffs, and National Surety Corporation, Respondent, v Leo H. Fleischman et al., Appellants.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on August 4, 1978, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Williams, J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — Birns, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bryant Hall, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 884]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), rendered May 24, 2002, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, rape in the first degree (two counts), attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the second degree, and assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made because he was not informed that he would be subject to a mandatory period of postrelease supervision is not preserved for appellate review. The defendant did not move to withdraw his plea of guilty or vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground (see *People v Chapman,*2 AD3d 647 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 596 [2004]; *People v Mapp,*308 AD2d 462 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 575 [2003]; *People v Higgins,*304 AD2d 773 [2003]; *People v Vatore,*303 AD2d 607 [2003]; *People v Curry,*301 AD2d 658, 659 [2003]; *People v Velez,*301 AD2d 619 [2003]; *People v Wilson,*296 AD2d 430 [2002]; *cf. People v Melio,*304 AD2d 247 [2003] [issue preserved by CPL 440.10 motion made in Supreme Court]). Further, we decline to review the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

In view of the foregoing, we do not reach the defendant’s remaining contentions. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted 
from Freeport-McMoRan Resource Partners, Limited Partnership 
financial statements at December 31, 1995 and for the 12 months 
then ended, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to 
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000793421
<NAME> FREEPORT-MCMORAN RESOURCE PARTNERS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          22,508
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,047
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    119,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               226,311
<PP&E>                                       1,829,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                 880,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,229,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,020
<BONDS>                                        384,241
<COMMON>                                       404,466
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,229,105
<SALES>                                        995,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               995,112
<CGS>                                          732,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  732,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                161,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            161,408
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   161,408
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 8, 2010, Noramco Inc., 1440 Olympic Dr., Athens, Georgia 30601, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
ScheduleCodeine-N-Oxide (9053)
IMorphine-N-Oxide (9307)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIOripavine (9330)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IINoroxymorphone (9668)
IIAlfentanil (9737)
IISufentanil (9740)
IICarfentanil (9743)
IITapentadol (9780)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than January 11, 2011. Dated: November 1, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-28524 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Blue Dolphin Energy Company (the
Registrant).2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
periods covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and we have:
     5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors:
    /s/ Ivar SiemIvar SiemChairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                           ML MACADAMIA ORCHARDS, L.P.
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER CLASS A UNIT
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        1998          1997            1996
                                                      -------        -------        -------
   <S>                                                <C>            <C>            <C>
   Net income                                         $   963        $15,581        $ 3,033


   Class A Unitholders' percentage of ownership            99%            99%            99%
                                                      -------        -------        -------


   Net income allocable to Class A Unitholders        $   953        $15,425        $ 3,003
                                                      -------        -------        -------
                                                      -------        -------        -------


   Class A Units outstanding                            7,500          7,500          7,500
                                                      -------        -------        -------
                                                      -------        -------        -------


   Net income per Class A Unit                        $  0.13        $  2.06        $  0.40
                                                      -------        -------        -------
                                                      -------        -------        -------
</TABLE>
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 1 6 0 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. W I L B E R M E N D O Z A

- C O R T E Z , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 2 : 0 9

- C R

- 7 6 6

- 2

B e f o r e H I G G I N B O T H A M , G A R Z A , a n d E L R O D , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t W i l b e r M e n d o z a - C o r t e z h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. M e n d o z a - C o r t e z h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 15 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40160 Document: 00511382074 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1813 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 162 Northeast Avenue in Tallmadge, Ohio, 

as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Daniel Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1813 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL DANIEL NATHAN DEYARMIN, 

2 JR., POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The facility of the United 

4 States Postal Service located at 162 Northeast Avenue in 

5 Tallmadge, Ohio, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Lance Corporal Daniel Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., Post Of7 fice Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Daniel 

12 Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0003297

13-FEB-2014

08:34 AM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-2358

THOMASINA C. LACEY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District 

Judge. (2:11-cv-00521-AWA-DEM)

Submitted: April 23, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomasina C. Lacey, Appellant Pro Se. Hope B. Eastman, Arthur 

G. House, PALEY, ROTHMAN, GOLDSTEIN, ROSENBERG, EIG & COOPER, 

CHTD, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomasina C. Lacey seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing without prejudice her employment 

discrimination complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction 

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292 

(2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan 

Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because Lacey could amend 

her complaint to cure the defects identified by the district 

court, the order she seeks to appeal is interlocutory and not 

appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 

392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
2005-2294.

#### State v. Henley.

Montgomery App. No. 20789, 2005-Ohio-6142. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1489, 2006-Ohio-962, 843 N.E.2d 795. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
March
      31,
      2008








Mr.
      Joshua L. Tosteson


347
      3 rd Street


Apt.
      5A


Brooklyn,
      NY 11215








Dear
      Joshua:





As
      you
      know, your employment agreement with HydroGen, L.L.C. (the “Company”), dated
      April 8, 2005 and effective April 1, 2005, is due to terminate on April 1,
      2008.





It
      is the
      Company’s current intention to continue your employment with the Company and to
      enter into a new letter agreement with you. To that end, the Company would
      like
      to continue your current employment agreement in full force and effect (the
      “Extension”) until the earlier of (1) May 1, 2008 and (2) the date on which you
      and the company enter into a new letter agreement. Please understand that
      neither this letter nor the Extension is a guarantee of continued employment
      with the Company.





In
      connection with the acceptance of this Extension, you hereby waive notice by
      the
      Company that your current employment agreement will not be renewed. As
      previously stated, the Company currently intends to enter into a new letter
      agreement with you.





If
      you
      agree to the terms of the Extension, please sign below and return the signed
      letter to me.





Sincerely,





/s/
      John
      J. Freeh





John
      J.
      Freeh


Chief
      Executive Officer








Agreed
      and accepted:










s/
                Joshua L. Tosteson
            Date:
                March 31, 2008Joshua
                L. Tosteson