alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Characteristics of 2020–21 Public and Private K–12 School Principals in the United States: Results From the National Teacher and Principal Survey      

# Report: Characteristics of 2020–21 Public and Private K–12 School Principals in the United States: Results From the National Teacher and Principal Survey

This report (PDF, 71 pages) provides new information about public and private K–12 school principals. The report also provides information on principals’ race, sex, age, average time spent on different activities, and influence on decisions. **Learn more.**
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Affinity Group Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify as follows:

 

1.     This statement is providedpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2009 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.     The Periodic Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.     The information contained inthe Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of dates and for theperiods indicated therein.

 

 

Date:  November 12, 2009

 

 
|   | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe       |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Thomas F. Wolfe           |
|   | Senior Vice President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity GroupHolding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

1

----
§ 1710.51 Direct loans. RUS makes direct loans under section 4 of the RE Act. ( a ) *General.* Except as otherwise modified by this section, RUS will make loans under the direct Treasury rate loan program in the same manner that it makes loans under the municipal rate program. The general and pre-loan policies and procedures for municipal rate electric loans made by RUS may be found in this part and 7 CFR part 1714. Treasury rate electric loans are also governed by such municipal rate policies and procedures, except as follows: ( 1 ) *Interest rates.* The standard interest rate on direct Treasury rate loans will be established daily by the United States Treasury. The borrower will select interest rate terms for each advance of funds. The minimum interest rate term shall be one year. Interest rate terms will be limited to terms published by the Treasury (i.e. 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 20, and 30). Interest rate terms to final maturity date, if other than published by Treasury, will be determined by RUS. Interest rates for terms greater than 30 years will be at the 30-year rate. There will be no interest rate cap on Treasury rate loans.
( 2 ) *Prepayment.* A Treasury rate direct electric loan may be repaid at par on its rollover maturity date if there is one. Such a loan, or portion thereof, may also be prepaid after it has been advanced for not less than two years, at any time prior to its rollover or final maturity date at its “net present value” (NPV) as determined by RUS.
( 3 ) *Supplemental financing.* Supplemental financing will not be required in connection with Treasury rate direct electric loans.
( 4 ) *Transitional assistance.* A Treasury rate direct loan is not available to provide transitional assistance to borrowers.
( b ) *Loan documents.* Successful applicants will be required to execute and deliver to RUS a promissory note evidencing the borrower's obligation to repay the loan. The note must be in form and substance satisfactory to RUS. RUS will require a form of note substantially in the form that it currently accepts for direct municipal rate electric loans, with such revisions as may be necessary or appropriate to reflect the different interest setting provisions and the terms of paragraphs (a) (1) and (2) of this section. All notes will be secured in accordance with the terms of 7 CFR part 1718.
[66 FR 66294, Dec. 26, 2001]
#### § 15f.11 Where must I file a hearing request and what happens to it?

If you desire a hearing, you must file a request for a hearing with the Docketing Clerk, citing the docket number assigned to your Section 741 Complaint Request. When the Docketing Clerk receives your request for a hearing, your Section 741 Complaint Request will be assigned to an ALJ. The Docketing Clerk will send a notice of your hearing request to OCR and the agency, notifying them of the docket number and the assigned ALJ. The Docketing Clerk also will send you a notice of receipt of the hearing request that will inform you of the name of the assigned ALJ.
p. 1


# OAR Box 1171 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 29 ) INDEX Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 5

Printed 4/29/20083:05:55PM

Sheet 29of 47P. 2 

## A-87-1 5

Docke t Numbe r A-87-1 5 Categor y II- F Interagenc y

Revie w Material s
Documen t Numbe r Descriptio n /ll-F- 1 Draf t Federa l Registe r notic e sen t t o OMB , proposa l

package .

(inr .

Arr \P. 3



### Docke t Numbe r A-87-1 5 Categor y III- A Amendment s an

dCorrection s t o Tes t Method s an dProcedure s Section s o f 4 0 CFRPar t 6 0 / . 

### Documen t Numbe r III-A- 1 

# X Descriptio nj

Notic e o f propose drulemaking : Standard s o f Performanc e fo r Ne w Stationary

Sources ; Amendment s t o Tes t Method s andProcedures , 5 3 F

R5082 , Februar y

19 , 1988 . !

, ..•,;•...•;-: -^CV-LCViO N ••,n= r ;C

v 

## APR" 5 198 8NUMBE

R P. 4

DOCKET : A-87-1 5 CATEGORY : IV- D

DAT EREC' D I NCD S Additiona lComments Receive d

CCMMENTE R etc . DAT E Q F DOC . IV-D-0 1 04-27-8 8 PENELEC , Pennsylvani a Electri c Company , Vincen t J . 04-21-8 8 Brisini ; Lette r w/attachmen t IV-D-0 2 05-04-8 8 Hunto n & Williams , Me l S . Schulz e (Counse l fo r 05-04-8 8 Utilit yAi r RegulatoryGroup ) Lette r w/attachmen t

' IV-D-0 3 05-05-8 8 Texac o Inc. , U.V . Henderson , Jr . 05-04-8 8P. 5



### Docke t Numbe r A-87-1 5 Category IV- H Interagenc y

Review Material s Documen t Numbe r (V-H- l Descriptio n Draf t Federa l Registe r notic e sen t t o OMB , promulgatio npackag e date d Octobe r 11 , 1988 .P. 6

Docke t Numbe r A-87-1 5 Categor y V- A Notic e o f Rulemakin g
Documen t Numbe r 

### I/-A- l

•A- 2

V-A- 3 Descriptio n Notic e o f fina l rulemaking : Standard s o f Performanc e fo r New

Stationar y

Sources ; Amendment s t o Tes t Method s an dProcedures , 5 4 F R6660 , Februar y

14 , 1989 . Correctio nnotice : Standard s o f Performanc e fo r New Stationar y

Sources ; Amendment s t o Tes t Method s an

dProcedures , 5 4 F

R21344 , Ma y 17 , 1989 . Technica l Amendment : Standard s o f Performanc e fo r New

Stationar y

Sources ; Amendment s t o Tes t Method s an dProcedures , 5 4 F R27015 , Jun e 27 , 1989 . 

# JJJ J j U L

### 181989 EPAAI R DOCKE T
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Investment Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2012 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 28, 2013



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David Gladstone                                           
|David Gladstone                                               
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
#### § 1404.9 OMB Control Numbers assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 35 and have been assigned OMB control number 0560-0004.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-118099) pertaining to the Stock Incentive Plan of
Kanbay International, Inc. of our report dated February 2, 2005 (except for Note 15, as to which the date is March 3, 2005), with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Kanbay International, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

|Chicago, Illinois |  | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|----------------- |  | ---------------------
|March 28, 2005    |  |                      

---



QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TREVOR YARDLEY WATSON,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-19-00026-CR

Appeal from the

372nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1557330R) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2020.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Joseph J. Kinslow, an Attorney.

Motion for reinstatement to the Bar granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and McNally, J J.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i.) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 27, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii.) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 4, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    Randy W. Furr                                
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Randy W. Furr                                       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Benson Dorsey v. State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-18-00520-CR, 01-18-00521-CR, 01-18-00522-CR

Trial court case numbers: 1569925, 1570348, 1570349

Trial court: 185th District Court of Harris County, Texas

Appellant Benson Dorsey filed a motion for en banc reconsideration of this Court’s 

December 12, 2019 opinion. The motion for en banc reconsideration is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Peter Kelly_______

Acting individually  Acting for the Court

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack, and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, 

Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams.

Justice Goodman, dissenting. 

Date: September 1, 2020
#### In the Matter of Rudolph M. Klenosky, Respondent, v New York City Police Department, et al., Appellants.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 25, 1979, which granted petition and directed respondents to issue a pistol carrying permit to petitioner, unanimously reversed, on the law, the application denied and the petition dismissed, without costs and disbursements. On this record it is clear that the administrative determination denying petitioner’s application for a pistol carrying permit (as distinct from an on-premises license) on the basis of failure to demonstrate "proper cause * * * for the issuance thereof’ is supported by substantial evidence and is not arbitrary or capricious. Petitioner, a 52-year-old attorney engaged in matrimonial and criminal law practice, did not sufficiently demonstrate a special need for self-protection distinguishable from that of the general community or of persons engaged in the same profession. The receipt of cash and checks (not in unusually high amounts) in the ordinary course of business for services rendered, which must be subsequently deposited in a bank, and threats from dissatisfied clients involved with the criminal law or threats related to the matrimonial practice, are not uncommon occurrences sufficient to distinguish petitioner from other attorneys engaged in similar practice. Further, petitioner’s disability (an artificial right leg which necessitates walking with a limp) does not, of itself, amount to such an unusual circumstance as to *794warrant issuance of a permit to carry a concealed pistol. Finally, petitioner’s professed fear of burglary in his home and office would be satisifed by issuance of an "on-premises” license, which type of license was, in fact, offered to petitioner, but refused. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sullivan, Lupiano, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Doris Allen, Respondent, and New York State et al., Appellants. Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., as Party in Interest.

In a proceeding, *inter alia,*to vacate an arbitration award, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated April 12, 1979, which granted the application. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, arbitrator’s award reinstated and proceeding dismissed. The arbitrator did not exceed his powers in permitting the State, at the outset of the hearing, to amend *964the penalty sought to be imposed. Although the collective bargaining agreement did not specifically empower the arbitrator to permit amendment of the proposed penalty, it did provide the arbitrator with broad discretion in fashioning the appropriate penalty once a finding of misconduct was made. Since the arbitrator could have imposed the penalty of termination at the conclusion of the hearing, it cannot be said that by allowing such amendment at the commencement of the hearing, he construed the contractual provisions in such an irrational manner as to warrant our setting aside the award. Furthermore, the statements which were submitted to the arbitrator after the close of the hearing were at most corroborative and cumulative. While prejudice is claimed, none has been shown. Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Hargett, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 21, 2022
No. 04-22-00418-CR Johnny GONZALES , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-CR-0573 Honorable Melisa C. Skinner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on May 21, 2022. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed July 1, 2022. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on July 15, 2022. T EX
. R. A PP . P. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on July 1, 2022, but he did not file a motion for extension of time. A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. See id . Having reviewed the record, it appears that the notice of appeal was untimely filed, and no motion for extension of time was filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing no later than August 5, 2022 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See id .; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). If appellant does not respond by August 5, 2022, this appeal will be dismissed. All appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of the court._________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of July, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 99



WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Microlog Corporation and
Subsidiaries (the Company), hereby certifies that on the date hereof:



|(a) |  | the annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2002, filed on the date
hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JOHN C. MEARSJohn C. Mears President and Chief Executive Officer (Duly Authorized Officer)




The undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of Microlog Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Company), hereby certifies that on the date hereof:



|(a) |  | the annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2002, filed on the date
hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    CHARLES B. FORD, JR.Charles B. Ford, Jr. Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)