alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Nicor Inc.
                                          Birdsall, Inc.
                                          Retirement
                                             Savings Plan
                                          Form 11-K
                                          Exhibit 23.03



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


Nicor Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-28579 of Nicor, Inc. Form S-8 of our report dated June 18, 2002 on the
financial statements of the Birdsall, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2001, included in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of
Nicor Companies Savings Investment Plan, Nicor Companies Thrift Plan and
Birdsall, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan for the year ended December 31, 2001.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP

June 26, 2002
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
#### In re EDWARDS.

(Supreme Court Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

In the matter of the application of William H. Edwards for admission to the bar.

No opinion. Application granted.
#### § 160.14 Opaque rosin.

The term “opaque rosin” shall apply to the article resulting when rosin undergoes internal modification indicated by a turbid, clouded, or opaque appearance, that is, loss of transparency, brought about by the occlusion of moisture or the formation of an excessive quantity of resin acid crystals in the rosin.
Exhibit 31.1





RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION





I, Sam Shlomo Elimelech, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Andain, Inc.;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for the small business issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Dated: January 12, 2011
/s/ Sam Shlomo Elimelech
Sam Shlomo Elimelech, President
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6254

ELBERT MAURICE MAYFIELD , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:15

- hc

- 02170

- BO )

Submitted : June 20, 2017 Decided: June 23, 2017

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Elbert Maurice Mayfield , Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Elbert Maurice Mayfield, a federal priso n er, appeals the district court’ s order and judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons st ated by the district court. Mayfield v. Andrews , No.
5:15

- hc

- 02170

- BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 1 0 , 201 7 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit (10)(X)



Non-Employee Director Compensation



|                                                      |               
|----------------------------------------------------- | --------------
|Type of Compensation                                  | Amount        
|Annual Retainer                                       | $25,000       
|Additional Monthly Retainer for Non-Employee Chairman | $  8,333      
|Board Attendance Fee per Meeting                      | $  1,500      
|Committee Attendance Fee per Meeting                  | $  1,000      
|Annual Retainer for Committee Chair (1)               | $  6,000/9,000
|Deferred Stock Units (2)                              | $50,000       
|Other Compensation                                    | (3)           



______________



(1)

The chair of the Audit Committee and the chair of the Compensation and Personnel Development Committee receive an annual retainer of $9,000; the chairs of the other committees receive an annual retainer of $6,000.



(2)

Each non-employee director continuing to serve on the Board of Directors of the Registrant after each annual meeting of stockholders receives an automatic grant of Deferred Stock Units under the Directors Deferred Stock Unit Plan equal to a value of $50,000 on the date of grant.  A Deferred Stock Unit is the right to receive, without payment to the Company, one share of common stock of the Company.  The Deferred Stock Units have a dividend equivalent feature, which provides for payment of cash dividends when and if cash dividends are paid on the outstanding common stock.



(3)

Directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses.  A non-employee director who serves on both the Harleysville Group and Harleysville Mutual boards receives only one retainer and, if the boards or the same committees of Harleysville Group and Harleysville Mutual meet on the same day, the non-employee director receives only one attendance fee.  In either situation, the retainer or attendance fee is allocated equally to Harleysville Group and Harleysville Mutual.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Answering the Call      

# Resource: Answering the Call

This nine-segment podcast series seeks to examine the roles and perspectives of first responders, marginalized communities, legal systems, and the role of OJJDP in the opioid crisis. The podcast series is a product of the Opioid Affected Youth Initiative (OAYI), which supports juvenile and criminal justice systems to address the needs of youth impacted by opioids and reduce juvenile justice and foster care system involvement.**Learn more.**
#### § 1773.45 Regulatory liabilities.

The auditor's audit documentation shall support that all regulatory liabilities comply with the requirements of ASC 980. For electric auditees only, the auditor's audit documentation shall document whether all regulatory liabilities have received RUS approval.
Exhibit 31.1**Rule 15d-14(a) Certification**  I, Gerald K. Carlson, Chief Executive Officer of PAHC Holdings Corporation, certify that: (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PAHC Holdings Corporation; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2005/s/ Gerald K. Carlson
§ 1753.46 General. ( a ) This subpart implements and explains the provisions of the loan documents setting forth the requirements and procedures to be followed by borrowers when outside plant major construction by contract is financed by loan funds. Terms used in this subpart are defined in § 1753.2 and RUS Contract Form 515.
( b ) The contract method for major construction is described in § 1753.5(b).
( c ) The two contract forms which may be used for major outside plant construction are Form 515 and Form 773. Limitations on the applicability of these forms shall be as follows: ( 1 ) Form 515 shall be used for major outside plant construction projects which will be competitively bid. The contract contains plans and specifications and has no dollar limitation. See §§ 1753.47, 1753.48 and 1753.49.
( 2 ) Contract Form 515, which is for $250,000 or less, may, at the borrower's option, be negotiated. See § 1753.48(b).
( 3 ) RUS Form 773 may be used for minor outside plant projects which are not competitively bid because they cannot be designed and staked at the time of contract execution. Projects of this nature include routine line extensions and placement of subscriber drops. See subpart I of this part.
[54 FR 39267, Sept. 25, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39397, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 43717, Aug. 25, 1994; 64 FR 16608, Apr. 6, 1999]
**Exhibit 32.1**

**AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.**

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I,Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer of Affinity GroupHolding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify asfollows:

1.                                       This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Periodic Report”);

2.                                       The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

3.                                       The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.
| Date: May 9, 2007 |
|-------------------|
|              |
|              |
|              | /s/ Michael A. Schneider |   |
|              |  Michael A.  Schneider |
|              |  President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or such otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of the writtenstatement as required by Section 906, has been provided to Affinity GroupHolding, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group Holding, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

1

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

              Consent of UHY Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp CPAs, LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-38606) of Blue Dolphin Energy Company and in the related Prospectus
of our report dated March 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) of Blue Dolphin Energy
Company for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ UHY Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp CPAs, LLP
Houston, Texas
March 25, 2005
#### § 1222.61 Independent evaluation.

At least once every five years, the Board shall authorize and fund from funds otherwise available to the Board, an independent evaluation of the effectiveness of the Order and the programs conducted by the Board pursuant to the Act. The Board shall submit to the Secretary, and make available to the public, the results of each periodic independent evaluation conducted under this section.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1412.61 Contract violations.

Violations of contract or application requirements will result in the termination or cancellation of the ARC or PLC contract. Upon such termination or cancellation, all producers that signed the contract or application forfeit all rights to receive payments for the ARC or PLC contract and are required to refund all payments received, plus interest as specified in § 1412.1(d) of this part, as determined in accordance with part 1403 of this chapter.

[79 FR 46339, Aug. 8, 2014, as amended at 83 FR 40659, Aug. 16, 2018]
No. 89-6043.

#### Williams *v.*McCarthy et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
§ 1717.150 General. ( a ) This subpart establishes RUS policies and procedures for mergers of electric borrowers. These policies and procedures are intended to provide borrowers with the flexibility to negotiate and enter into mergers that offer advantages to the borrowers and to rural communities, and adequately protect the integrity and credit quality of RUS loans and loan guarantees.
( b ) Consistent with prudent lending practices, the maintenance of adequate security for RUS loans and loan guarantees, and the objectives of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as amended, (7 U.S.C. 901 *et seq.*) (RE Act), RUS encourages electric borrowers to consider mergers when such action is likely to contribute, in the long-term, to greater operating efficiency and financial soundness. Borrowers are specifically encouraged to explore mergers that are likely to enhance the ability of the successor to provide reliable electric service at reasonable cost to RE Act beneficiaries.
( c ) Pursuant to the loan documents and RUS regulations, certain mergers are subject to RUS approval. See § 1717.615.
( d ) Since RUS must take action in order to advance funds and otherwise conduct business with a successor, RUS encourages borrowers to consult RUS early in the process regardless of whether RUS approval of the merger is required. RUS will provide technical assistance and guidance to borrowers to help expedite the processing of their requests and to help resolve potential problems early in the process.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1304

KATHRYN DUVALL, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (2:06-cv-03544-CWH) Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 23, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kathryn Duvall, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret League Boylston, PETERS, MURDAUGH, PARKER, ELTZROTH & DETRICK, PA, Hampton, South Carolina, Benjamin Phillip Glass, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.*Although Duvall summarily requests an order redacting all of her personal information and work history from the court’s records, as well as an order se aling the court’s records, because she has not established she is entitled to this relief, we deny Duvall’s requests. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Kathryn Duvall appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her defamation claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. * See Duvall v. Honeywell Tech. Solutions, Inc. , No. 2:06-cv-03544-CWH (D.S.C. filed Feb. 6, 2008; entered Feb. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51136 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CRISPIN BUENROSTRO-IBARRA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-213-1-WWJ

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Crispin Buenrostro-Ibarra appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Buenrostro contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Buenrostro maintains that heNo. 02-51136 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Buenrostro acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.