alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title
18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Kraton Polymers LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (each, the Registrant), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (Form
10-Q) of the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Kraton.

Date: August 4, 2010



By:

/S/    KEVIN M.
FOGARTYKevin M. Fogarty
President and Chief Executive Officer




By:

/S/    STEPHEN E.
TREMBLAYStephen E. Tremblay
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kraton Performance Polymers, Inc. and
Kraton Polymers LLC and will be retained by them and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Lopez, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 861]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James Yates, J.), rendered May 31, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 21⁄2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s *Sandoval*ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion *(see People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203 [2002]; *People v Walker,*83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]; *People v Pavao,*59 NY2d 282, 292 [1983]). Defendant’s theft-related convictions were highly relevant to his credibility, notwithstanding their similarity to the present charges. Furthermore, the court only permitted inquiry into a portion of defendant’s very extensive record, and precluded elicitation of any underlying facts.

The court properly denied defendant’s challenges for cause to two prospective jurors. The mere fact that one prospective juror was a police officer is not ground for a challenge for cause, and the officer said nothing to indicate that he could not be impartial *(see People v Webb,*285 AD2d 659, 660 [2001]). Furthermore, his statement that he “believed” he would do his best to be impartial was not disqualifying *(see People v Chambers,*97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]). He also unequivocally stated that his impartiality would not be affected by any “outlandish” statements that defense counsel might make during cross-examination, and that he could acquit defendant if he did not believe a testifying police officer. Although the other panelist brought up her feelings of sympathy for a friend who recently had been the victim of a *351theft, upon being told by the court that the case must be decided on the evidence alone, without any sympathy for either side, she unequivocally stated that there was no reason she could not be fair and impartial. The record, viewed as a whole, establishes that she gave unequivocal assurances of impartiality *(see People v Johnson,*94 NY2d 600, 614 [2000]; *see also People v Nicholas,*98 NY2d 749 [2002]; *People v Arnold,*96 NY2d 358, 362-363 [2001]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-73,170]

                    By application dated July 16, 2010, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on June 21, 2010. The Notice of Determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 7, 2010 (75 FR 39049).                

Workers are engaged in employment related to the production of telephone directories. The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the findings that worker separations are not attributable to increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with telephone directories or a shift/acquisition of these articles to a foreign country by the workers' firm.

In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided additional information pertaining to a shift in production abroad.

The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of August, 2010.

Del Min Amy Chen,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-28486 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT EDWARD HELLIWELL, DOC #T94318, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2486 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed May 2, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Mark R. Wolfe, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and William L. Sharwell, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Investment Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on thedate hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,2019 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: February 4, 2020/s/ David GladstoneDavid Gladstone*Chief Executive Officer and**Chairman of the Board of Directors***
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12373 and #12374]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of California dated 11/05/2010. *Incident:*
                         Roseville Galleria Mall Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         10/21/2010 through 10/22/2010.
 Effective Date: 11/05/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/04/2011. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         08/05/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Placer. *Contiguous Counties:* California: El Dorado, Nevada, Sacramento, Sutter, Yuba. Nevada: Carson City, Douglas, Washoe. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere*
4.500*Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
2.250*Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere*
6.000*Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
4.000*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere*
3.250*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
3.000*For Economic Injury**Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
4.000*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere*
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12373 5 and for economic injury is 12374 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California; Nevada. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: November 5, 2010. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2010-28587 Filed 11-12-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50177 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus IVORY WHITFIELD, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-01-CR-198-2

-------------------- December 23, 2002 Before REAVLEY, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ivory Whitfield appeals his conviction and sentence for aiding and abetting and in possession with intent to distribute in excess of 100 kilograms of marijuana. R. 1, 5-6. Whitfield asserts that the district court abused its discretion in admitting hearsay testimony, expert testimony, and a Western Union receipt. See United States v. Hernandez-Guevara , 162 F.3d 863, 869 (5th Cir. 1998). If an abuse of discretion is found, we review the error under the harmless error doctrine. UnitedNo. 02-50177 -2- States v. Skipper , 74 F.3d 608, 612 (5th Cir. 1996). Whitfield has not shown that the district court abused it discretion in admitting any of the challenged evidence. Bourjaily v. United
States , 483 U.S. 171, 181 (1987); United States v. Washington , 44 F.3d 1271, 1283 (5th Cir. 1995). Additionally, Whitfield confirms in his brief that he confessed to possessing the marijuana at the time of his arrest. The evidence of Whitfield’s guilt is overwhelming and, if there had been any error in admitting the evidence in question, it was harmless. Whitfield argues that the district court erred by failing to decrease his offense level for acceptance of responsibility because he confessed his involvement at the time of his arrest. This argument is unpersuasive because part of his defense at trial was the suggestion that he made no such confession. The district court did not err in denying a reduction. See United States v. Nguyen , 190 F.3d 656, 659 (5th Cir. 1999). Whitfield argues that the district court erred by not reducing his offense level for a minimal role in the offense of conviction. Whitfield was trusted with sole custody of the large and valuable shipment of marijuana. Based on this fact, the district court was not clearly erroneous in denying the offense level reduction. United States v. Becerra , 155 F.3d 740, 757 (5th Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1425.18 Distribution of proceeds. ( a ) ( 1 ) If CCC makes loans or LDP's for any quantity in a loan pool, the related proceeds must be distributed or otherwise made available to the members account: ( i ) Based on the quantity and quality of the commodity delivered by each member;
( ii ) Less any authorized charges for services performed or paid by the CMA necessary to condition or otherwise make the commodity eligible for MALs or LDPs, according to the marketing agreement provided for in § 1425.13;
( iii ) Within 15 work days from the date the CMA receives MAL or LDP proceeds from CCC, or held according to the terms of a deferred payment agreement if requested by the member.
( 2 ) CMA's may credit advances to its members made before loans and LDP's are obtained against the distribution of MAL and LDP proceeds requirement in paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, loan pool proceeds must not be combined with non-loan pool proceeds and the CMA must distribute loan pool proceeds according to the information it provided CCC in accordance with § 1425.4(a)(5).
( 2 ) Sales proceeds from a loan pool may be combined with sales proceeds from other pools if the proceeds from such pools are allocated among the pools according to the quantity and quality of the commodity included in the pools.
( 3 ) MAL and LDP proceeds shall only be issued to members involved in pools used for MALs or LDP's.
( 4 ) When notified by CCC that MAL and LDP distributions to a member are required to be reduced for a program year, farm, or crop, a CMA must not make subsequent pool distributions and must reimburse CCC for distributions previously issued, if applicable.
( c ) CMAs must apply market loan gains to the payment limit that is earned on date of redemption for their members when the CMA distributes the pool funds.
[63 FR 17312, Apr. 9, 1998, as amended at 71 FR 42750, July 28, 2006; 80 FR 131, Jan. 2, 2015]
Exhibit
32.2





PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly report
of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Ginsberg, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date:
May 7, 2009





/s/
Alan
Ginsberg


Alan
Ginsberg


Principal
Financial Officer
#### RODNEY KYLES *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(AC 23539)

Foti, Bishop and McLachlan, Js.

Submitted on briefs October 30

officially released December 2, 2003

Per Curiam.

The habeas court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petitioner certification to appeal from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The appeal is dismissed.
#### § 1402.5 Late payments.

If payment is not received by CCC within the period specified in the sales contract, interest will be assessed by CCC. If a buyer fails to make arrangements for payment according to the provisions of the contract, CCC retains the right to terminate the sales contract. If CCC terminates the sales contract for default in whole or in part, CCC may offer the commodity for sale and the original party will be liable to CCC for any losses incurred and damages sustained as a result of the party's failure to timely remit payment for the commodity.
Exhibit 31.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I , Richard Kelley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K-SB of Clixtix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 30, 2004


/s/ "Richard Kelley"
Richard Kelley,
Vice President
(principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer)
§ 1280.628 Counting ballots. ( a ) Form LS-86 shall be counted by county FSA offices on the same day as the ballots are canvassed if there are no ineligibility determinations to resolve. For those county FSA offices that do have ineligibility determinations, the requests shall be counted no later than the 14th business day following the final day of the voting period.
( b ) Ballots shall be counted as follows: ( 1 ) Number of valid ballots cast;
( 2 ) Number of persons favoring the Order;
( 3 ) Number of persons not favoring the Order;
( 4 ) Volume of production voted favoring the continuation of the Order;
( 5 ) Volume of production voted not favoring the continuation of the Order; and
( 6 ) Number of invalid ballots.
Exhibit 32




SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





In connection with the quarterly report of Andain, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 23, 2011





/s/ Sam Shlomo ElimelechSam Shlomo Elimelech, PresidentDated: May 23, 2011





/s/ Gai Mar-ChaimGai Mar-Chaim, Secretary/Treasurer

(principal financial officer)