alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA).

# ACTION:

Notice of PRB membership.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of DTRA's PRB membership. The publication of the PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB shall provide fair and impartial review of Senior Executive Service performance appraisals and makes recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance scores to the Director, Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         The effective date of service for the appointees of the DTRA PRB is on or about November 1, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tana Farrell at (703) 767-5759 or Lisa Shipe at (703) 767-0425, Human Capital Office, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Stop 6201, Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060-6201.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the officials appointed to serve as members of the DTRA PRB are set forth below:

*PRB Chair:*                     Major General John Howlett.                

*Member:*                     Mr. Douglas Bruder.                

*Member:*                     Ms. Shari Durand.                

*Member:*                     Mr. Kevin Flanagan.                

Executives listed will serve a one-year term, effective November 1, 2010.

Dated: November 2, 2010.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-28642 Filed 11-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 32.2 - Director Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of My Quote Zone, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, Mark Theis, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark Theis
-------------------
    Mark Theis
    Director


Date  May 11, 2006
      ------------


<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withAmendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of M.L. Macadamia Orchards, L.P. (the“Partnership”) for the period ended December 31, 2008 on Form 10-K/Aas filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),we, the undersigned management of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Partnership.

 
| /s/ Wayne W. Roumagoux  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| Wayne W. Roumagoux      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| June XX, 2009      |   |

 

----
Exhibit 13.1

Annual Certification  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Tele2 AB (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date: June 21, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/LARS-JOHAN JARNHEIMER
|------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------
|                    |  | Name:  |  | Lars-Johan Jarnheimer   
|                    |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer 
|Date: June 21, 2005 |  | By:    |  | /s/HÅKAN ZADLER         
|                    |  | Name:  |  | Håkan Zadler            
|                    |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer 

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

** PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

** AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

I,Raymond J. Spencer, Chief Executive Officer of Kanbay International, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify that:

(1)             TheCompany’s annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the period endedDecember 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)             Theinformation contained in the Form 10-K, as amended, fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany for the periods presented therein.
| /s/ RAYMOND J. SPENCER    |     |
|---------------------------|----------|
| Raymond J. Spencer        |     |
| *Chief Executive Officer* | * * |
| September 22, 2006        |     |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1758 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1758

To increase the portion of community development block grants that may 
      be used to provide public services, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2013

Ms. Ros-Lehtinen (for herself, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, 
 Ms. Wilson of Florida, and Mr. Garcia) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To increase the portion of community development block grants that may 
      be used to provide public services, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CDBG Public Services Flexibility Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PUBLIC SERVICES CAP.

    Section 105(a)(8) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305(a)(8)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``15 per centum'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``25 percent''; and
            (2) by striking ``amount, except'' and all that follows 
        through the semicolon at the end and inserting ``amount;''.
                                 <all>
```
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, William D. Markert, Chief Financial Officer of Securus Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/WILLIAM D. MARKERT       |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | William D. Markert          |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer*** |
|   | November 14, 2008           |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLNM920000 L13100000 FI0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of reinstatement of terminated oil and gas leases.

# SUMMARY:

Under the Class II provisions of Title IV, Public Law 97-451, the Bureau of Land Management received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas leases NMNM 110795, NMNM 110797, and NMNM 110802 from the lessee, David Petroleum Corporation et al, for lands in Guadalupe County, New Mexico. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Margie Dupre, Bureau of Land Management, New Mexico State Office, P.O. Box 27115, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502 or at (505) 954-2142.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    No valid lease has been issued that affects the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10 per acre or fraction thereof, per year, and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500 administrative fee for the reinstatement of the leases and the $166 cost for publishing this Notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    . The lessee met all the requirements for reinstatement of the leases as set out in Section 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). The BLM is proposing to reinstate leases NMNM 110795, NMNM 110797, and NMNM 110802 effective back to the date of termination, September 1, 2009, under the original terms and conditions of the lease except for the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                

Margie Dupre,

Land Law Examiner, Fluids Adjudication Team.

[FR Doc. 2010-2852 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
§ 1719.12 Reporting. ( a ) *General.* RESP borrowers must file periodic performance and financial reports as provided in the loan documents.
( b ) *Frequency of reporting.* Performance and financial reports will be filed semiannually for the first 10 years of the RESP loan and annually thereafter through the term of the loan. However, RUS may require additional, or more frequent, reporting when necessary to preserve the quality and integrity of the program portfolio or advance policy goals.
( c ) *Reporting elements.* RUS will identify the reporting requirements, in form and substance, in the loan documents based on the RESP borrower and EE Program profile. The RESP borrower's reports to RUS will include, but will not be limited to, the following information: ( 1 ) Number and amount of loans to qualified consumers.
( 2 ) Types of investments in EE measures and eligible activities.
( 3 ) EE Program portfolio performance.
( 4 ) Evidence of compliance with Multi-Tier Action Environmental Compliance Agreement.
( 5 ) Status and amount of Loan Loss Reserve (when applicable).
#### § 1781.13 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT
99.1
 
 
 
 Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 To the
Stockholders of
 Alba
Plant LLC
 
 
 In our
opinion, the balance sheets and the related statements of income, statements of
stockholders’ equity, and statements of cash flows present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial positionof Alba Plant LLC
(the “Company”) at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.  These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.  We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
 
 
 /s/
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 
 Houston,
TX
 February
13, 2009
  1
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending  June 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, D.
Bruce Horton,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: August 17, 2007



                                        By: /s/ D. BRUCE HORTON
                                            _________________________________
                                                D. Bruce Horton
                                                Chief Financial Officer
#### Pogue vs. Richardson, &c.

Chancery. Case 67.

Error- to (he Mercer ’ ircuit; Kelly Judge.

*Bill, dismissal of. Error, assignment of.*

When a bill is dismissed for want of necessary parties, the dismissal should be “wi'hout prejudice” 'ind an *absolute*dismissal on such ground is error. Assignment oí error in general terms “that the court below erred in dismissing complainant’s bill” decided to embrace an error committed in the *manner*of the dismissal of the bill. This court will, to reach the justice of a ca=e, give liberal constructions to assignments of error.

April 19.

Judge Underwood

delivered (he opinion of the court.

The personal representative of Daniel Richardson, if he had any, was a necessary party. When the suit was abated by the death of said Daniel, it should have been revived against his administrator or executor, or it should have been shown by an amended bill that he had none. This matter was not suggested by counsel in the original argument, and it was overlooked by the court. For want of proper parties, the bill should have been dismissed without prejudice, and the court erred in dismissing the bill absolutely.

It is contended, however, that there can be no reversal for this cause, as it is not reached by any assignment of error. It is assigned for error in general terms, that the “court below erred in dismissing the complainant’s bill.” We are disposed to be liberal and not critically nice in construing assignments of error, for the purpose of reaching the justice of the case; and therefore we think such an assignment as the above is sufficient to embrace an error committed by the court in the *manner*of dismissing a bill. We have been referred to the case of Shockly vs. Niess’ heirs, 3 J. J. Marshall 96 as ruling this. We are not willing to apply that case to this, because in that there was no equity in the bill, and the decision iirthat did not turn upon the question now made.

The decree of the circuit is reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions to permit the appellant Pogue to amend his. bill, and to bring the proper parties before the court, which if he fails to do within reasonable time, the bill must be dismissed without prejudice. If the appellant amends, the court will take such other steps as may be proper to bring the cause to trial. We shall abstain from discussing the merits of the controversy, because we cannot foresee what new aspect the case may assume. The former opinion is set aside, and *241this substituted. Neither party shall recover costs in this court. <

< Daviess, for plaintiff; Owsley, for defendant.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kevin M. Shook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2008 |  | /s/ Kevin M. Shook                   
|                     |  | Kevin M. Shook                       
|                     |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
F ORP UB L I C AT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J E S US AN T ON I O RAMOS CERV A N TES, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 50521 D . C . N o. 2: 09 -c r- 00 35 8-JF W -1 C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f

C a lif o rn ia , L os A ng el es OR DE RAME ND ING OP INI ON

B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , D . W . N E L S O N , an dIK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T h e o p i n i o n fi l edM ay 1 6 , 2 0 1 2 , i s am en d edas fo l l o w s: T he att a c he d phot ogr aph s ha l lbe i ns e rt e d atthe e nd of S l ip O p. 5215 an de n title d“A p p e n d ix A .” 

# FI LED MA Y17 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA reliable multicast for XTPMulticast services needed for current distributed applications on LAN's fall generally into one of three categories: datagram, semi-reliable, and reliable. Transport layer multicast datagrams represent unreliable service in which the transmitting context 'fires and forgets'. XTP executes these semantics when the MULTI and NOERR mode bits are both set. Distributing sensor data and other applications in which application-level error recovery strategies are appropriate benefit from the efficiency in multidestination delivery offered by datagram service. Semi-reliable service refers to multicasting in which the control algorithms of the transport layer--error, flow, and rate control--are used in transferring the multicast distribution to the set of receiving contexts, the multicast group. The multicast defined in XTP provides semi-reliable service. Since, under a semi-reliable service, joining a multicast group means listening on the group address and entails no coordination with other members, a semi-reliable facility can be used for communication between a client and a server group as well as true peer-to-peer group communication. Resource location in a LAN is an important application domain. The term 'semi-reliable' refers to the fact that group membership changes go undetected. No attempt is made to assess the current membership of the group at any time--before, during, or after--the data transfer.Document ID19920024864Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDempsey, Bert J.*(Digital Technology, Inc., Champaign IL., United States)*Weaver, Alfred C.*(Digital Technology, Inc., Champaign IL., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryComputer SystemsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:190632NASA-CR-190632Accession Number92N34108Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC9-16PROJECT: RICIS PROJ. SE-31Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920024864.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024