alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLORP00000.L10200000.PI0000; HAG11-0061]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Meeting notice for the John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council (JDSRAC) will meet as indicated below.

# DATES:

The JDSRAC meeting will begin at 8 a.m. (Pacific) on November 30, 2010.

# ADDRESSES:

The JDSRAC will meet at the Umatilla National Forest Headquarters located at 2517 SW Hailey Avenue, Pendleton, Oregon 97801. For a copy of material to be discussed or the conference call number, please contact the BLM Prineville District at the address below.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The JDSRAC will conduct a public meeting to discuss several topics, including the Blue Mountain Forest Plan Revision alternatives, recent information on Sage-grouse and wolf management; set goals for 2011 in a strategic planning session, and hear a presentation by Portland General Electric on the proposed Cascade Crossing Transmission Project. Public comment is scheduled from 1 p.m. to 1:15 p.m. (Pacific) November 30, 2010, during the Council Meeting. For a copy of information distributed to JDSRAC members, please contact the BLM Prineville District Office at (541) 416-6700 or at the address listed below.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Christina Lilienthal, Public Affairs Specialist, BLM Prineville District Office, 3050 NE Third, Prineville, Oregon 97754, (541) 416-6889 or e-mail:                         *christina_lilienthal@blm.gov.*

Stephen R. Robertson,

Associate District Manager, BLM Prineville District Office.

[FR Doc. 2010-28602 Filed 11-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
**IN THE SUPREME COURT**  **FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA**  No. DA 23
- 0137 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee , v. GRANT WEST , Defendant and Appellant
. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Defendant and Appellant ’s Motion For Extension Of Time , and with good cause shown, Defendant and Appellant Grant West is hereby granted an extension of time until October 25, 2024 in which to prepare, file and
serve Defendant and Appellant ’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 5 2024

10/07/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0137
§ 1753.11 Contract amendments. ( a ) The borrower must obtain RUS approval before execution of any amendment to a contract if ( 1 ) The amendment alters the terms and conditions of the contract or changes the scope of the project covered by the contract regardless of the amount of the contract before amendment,
( 2 ) The amendment increases the amount to be paid under the contract by 20% or more, or
( 3 ) The amendment causes an unbonded contract to require a contractor's performance bond. This would occur when a contract that is executed in an amount below that requiring a performance bond by 7 CFR part 1788, subpart C, is amended to an amount above that amount.
( b ) Advance RUS approval to execute other contract amendments is not required. These amendments may be submitted to RUS at any time prior to closeout. If a borrower wishes to receive an advance of funds based on an amended contract amount (i.e., amendments that increase a contract by less than 20%), the borrower may initiate an increase in the amount approved for advance by submitting three copies of the amendment to RUS for approval.
( c ) For each amendment executed, the borrower shall make certain that: ( 1 ) The contractor's bond covers the additional work to be performed. If the amendment by itself (or together with preceding amendments) increases the original contract price by 20% or more, a bond extension will be required to bring the penal sum of the bond to the total amended contract price.
( 2 ) If an amendment covers construction in a county or state not included in the original contract, the borrower and contractor are licensed to do business in that location.
( d ) Upon execution of any amendment that causes the amended contract amount to exceed the original contract amount by 20% or more, three copies of the amendment shall be submitted to RUS for approval.
[54 FR 39267, Sept. 25, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39396, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 64 FR 16605, Apr. 6, 1999]
#### §§ 1726.28-1726.34 [Reserved]
## Other Youth Topics

## Breadcrumb

            -  Youth Topics 
            -  Violence Prevention 
            -  National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Communities: Boston 
            -           City of Boston's Youth Violence Prevention Plan      

# City of Boston's Youth Violence Prevention Plan

## Background

The City of Boston was selected by President Barack Obama's Administration to participate in a National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention. Under the strong leadership of Mayor Thomas M. Menino, Boston has a long and rich history of collaboration, community involvement, and innovation to address youth violence. This planning process has clarified for partners what our strengths are, what challenges remain, and what our focus areas need to be for the next three years to achieve sustainable long-term reductions in youth violence.

## The Plan:

                        - Builds on the strong foundation already in place
                        - Takes a broad, comprehensive approach to problem-solving
                        - Articulates key principles, goals and objectives
                        - Identifies challenges and needs
                        - Incorporates input from a broad array of partners, stakeholders, community members and youth
                        - Acknowledges resource constraints
                        - Lays out a framework and blueprint for achieving success in reducing and preventing youth violence
                        - Includes an accountability process for measuring outcomes
                        - Incorporates national best practices and important lessons learned, but it also aligns and equips the unique collaborations already in existence

## Challenges identified during the process:

                      - Citywide coordination across various sectors
                      - Information sharing and communication across systems and neighborhoods
                      - Gaps in programming/ services/ coverage in some areas – employment, education, family support and strengthening, mental health/trauma
                      - Availability and use of firearms, which is being addressed in part by Mayors Against Illegal Guns legislation and advocacy work

## Strategic goals:

                      - Facilitate interagency communication and information sharing
                      - Promote citywide civic engagement focused on youth violence reduction
                      - Enhance and coordinate multi-disciplinary, and data-driven: PREVENTION, INTERVENTION, ENFORCEMENT, and REENTRY

## Vision

*Youth and families thriving in safe and healthy neighborhoods, vibrant with opportunities for personal, spiritual, educational and economic growth*

## Activities:

Examples of activities to be undertaken over the next three years include:

Ongoing, coordinated resource development and advocacy in support of plan components will be critical to success.

## Main navigation

- National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Communities: Boston
- Boston Reentry Initiative
- The Circle of Promise
- Safe Street Teams
- Youth Options Unlimited Boston
§ 1710.104 Service to non-RE Act beneficiaries. ( a ) To the greatest extent practical, loans are limited to providing and improving electric facilities to serve consumers that are RE Act beneficiaries. When it is determined by the Administrator to be necessary in order to furnish or improve electric service in rural areas, loans may, under certain circumstances, be made to finance electric facilities to serve consumers that are not RE Act beneficiaries.
( b ) Loan funds may be approved for facilities to serve non-RE Act beneficiaries only if: ( 1 ) The primary purpose of the loan is to furnish or improve service for RE Act beneficiaries; and
( 2 ) The use of loan funds to serve non-RE Act beneficiaries is necessary and incidental to the primary purpose of the loan.
[57 FR 1053, Jan. 9, 1992; 57 FR 4513, Feb. 5, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 66264, Dec. 20, 1993]
#### § 1720.15 Equal opportunity requirements.

*Executive Order 12898, “Environmental Justice.”* To comply with Executive Order 12898, RUS will conduct a Civil Rights Analysis for each guarantee prior to approval. Rural Development Form 2006-28, “Civil Rights Impact Analysis”, will be used to document compliance in regards to environmental justice. The Civil Rights Impact Analysis will be conducted prior to application approval or a conditional commitment of guarantee.
#### City of Little Falls, Respondent-Appellant, v. R. Greene Real Estate Corporation, Appellant-Respondent.

Order insofar as appealed from by R. Greene Real Estate Corporation unanimously reversed and application for additional allowance of 5% of the amount of the award granted; and otherwise order insofar as appealed from by the City of Little Falls affirmed, without costs *641of these appeals to either party. Memorandum: In the exercise of a proper discretion the application for additional allowance should have been granted. *(Power Auth. of State of N. Y.*v. *Wustrack,*10 N Y 2d 730; *Matter of Dodge*v. *Kelley,*19 A D 2d 797.) (Appeal by defendant from part of an order of Herkimer Special Term, denying motion for additional allowance of costs. Cross appeal by plaintiff from part of same order in favor of defendant.) Present•— Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Veeehio, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TennesseeCommerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|        | By:                         | /s/ George W. Fort |   |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|   | George W. Fort              |
|   | Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |                        |
|   | Dated: August 14, 2006 |

 

----
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                        | October      29, 2008 |
|------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                         |                  |
| /s/      CHRIS TONG          |
| CHRIS      TONG              |
| Chief      Financial Officer |

----
§ 1493.110 Guarantee fees. ( a ) *Guarantee fee rates.* Payment Guarantee fee rates charged may be one of the following two types: ( 1 ) Those that are announced on the USDA Web site and are based upon the length of the payment terms provided for in the Firm Export Sales Contract, the degree of risk that CCC assumes, as determined by CCC, and any other factors which CCC determines appropriate for consideration.
( 2 ) Those where Exporters are invited to submit a competitive bid for coverage. If CCC determines to offer coverage on a competitive fee bid basis, instructions for bidding, and minimum fee rates, if applicable, will be made available on the USDA Web site.
( b ) *Calculation of fee.* The guarantee fee will be computed by multiplying the Guaranteed Value by the guarantee fee rate.
( c ) *Payment of fee.* The Exporter shall remit, with his application, the full amount of the guarantee fee. Applications will not be accepted until the guarantee fee has been received by CCC. The Exporter's wire transfer or check for the guarantee fee shall be made payable to CCC and be submitted in the manner specified on the USDA Web site.
( d ) *Refunds of fee.* Guarantee fees paid in connection with applications that are accepted by CCC will ordinarily not be refundable. Once CCC notifies an Exporter of acceptance of an application, the fee for that application will not be refunded unless the Director determines that such refund will be in the best interest of CCC, even if the Exporter withdraws the application prior to CCC's issuance of the Payment Guarantee. If CCC does not accept an application for a Payment Guarantee or accepts only part of the guarantee coverage requested, a full or pro rata refund of the fee will be made.
#### Kurdistan Democratic Party, Respondent, v Shakeeb Akrawy, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 7, 1979 denying defendant’s motion to dismiss complaint on ground that plaintiff does not have the capacity to sue, affirmed, without costs. The complaint leaves in doubt the legal character of the plaintiff, thus presenting a question as to plaintiff’s capacity to sue in addition to those litigated at Special Term. (Cf. General Associations Law, § 12; Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, § 1202, subd [a], par [4]; CPLR 3015, subd [b].) The factual issues critical to a determination of plaintiffs capacity to sue require a full evidentiary exploration. The nature of the issue may justify a separate, preliminary trial. (CPLR 603.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Fein, Sandler and Silverman, JJ.
#### § 1740.94 Confidentiality of Applicant information.

Applicants are encouraged to identify and label any confidential and proprietary information contained in their applications. The Agency will protect confidential and proprietary information from public disclosure to the fullest extent authorized by applicable law, including the Freedom of Information Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552), the Trade Secrets Act, as amended (18 U.S.C. 1905), the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (18 U.S.C. 1831 *et seq.*), and CALEA (47 U.S.C. 1001 *et seq.*). Applicants should be aware, however, that this program requires substantial transparency. For example, RUS is required to make publicly available on the internet a list of each entity that has applied for a loan or grant, a description of each application, the status of each application, the name of each entity receiving funds, and the purpose for which the entity is receiving the funds.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Guiding Principles and Best Practices in School Discipline to Support Students’ Social, Emotional, Behavioral, and Academic Needs      

# Resource: Guiding Principles and Best Practices in School Discipline to Support Students’ Social, Emotional, Behavioral, and Academic Needs

This webpage features a series of four fact sheets that describe best practices and approaches to help support and respond to students’ social, emotional, behavioral, and academic needs, including practices to reduce the use of exclusionary discipline in schools. Each of these fact sheets is tailored to a specific audience at the school or district level: 
                  -  Creating and Sustaining Discipline Policies That Support Students’ Social, Emotional, Behavioral, and Academic Well-Being and Success: Strategies for School and District Leaders (PDF, 7 pages)  
                  -  Supporting Students’ Social, Emotional, Behavioral, and Academic Well-Being and Success: Strategies for Student and Teacher Support Teams (PDF, 5 pages)  
                  -  Supporting Students’ Social, Emotional, Behavioral, and Academic Well-Being and Success: Strategies for Educators and School-Based Staff (PDF, 5 pages)  
                  -  Supporting Students’ Social, Emotional, Behavioral, and Academic Well-Being and Success: Strategies for Schools to Enhance Relationships With Families (PDF, 6 pages)  

**Learn more.**
----

Exhibit 32 

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 In connection with the Annual Report of K-Tronik International  Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2003 as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge: 

|   | 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        |
|--------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |     |                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | 2.       | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation        of the Company. |

| Dated: Decemeber 31, 2003 | By:    | /s/ Robert Kim                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|---------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |   Robert Kim, President, Treasurer and Director    Dated: Decemeber 31, 2003By:/s/ Kenneth Edwards    Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer |
#### DRISCOLL, Respondent, v. LONG ISLAND R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by Johanna Driscoll, as administratrix, etc., of Jeremiah P. Driscoll, deceased, against the Long Island Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Nicor Inc.
                                                         Nicor Companies Savings
                                                                 Investment Plan
                                                                       Form 11-K
                                                                   Exhibit 23.01






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-74402 of Nicor Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated June 13, 2003, on the
financial statements of the Nicor Companies Savings Investment Plan as of and
for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, included in this Annual Report
on Form 11-K of Nicor Companies Savings Investment Plan and Nicor Gas Thrift
Plan for the year ended December 31, 2002.







DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois

June 27, 2003
#### In the Matter of Americus Mitchell.

Memorandum by the Court. Application for admission to practice as an attorney and counselor at law without examination pursuant to rule VII of the Rules of the Court of Appeals for *679Admission of Attorneys and Counselors at Law denied on the ground that the application does not meet the requirements of paragraph b of subdivision 1 and paragraph b of subdivision 2 of said rule. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.