T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T C HA R L E S MAR K R OU S S E AU , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71587 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 356- 454 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M a y15, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , G R A B E R , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C ha r l e s M a rk R ous s e au, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve 

# FI LED MA Y23 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2 09- 71587

j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f ors ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e the agency ’ s f

ac tual fi nd i ng s, and w e r evi ew de no vo the agency’ s l egal d et erm i n at i o n s. W

akkaryv. H

older , 5 5 8 F .3 d1 0 4 9 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . W e d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatR ou ss eau est abl i shed c h a n g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s to e x c u s e h is u n tim e lya s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 C. F. R. § 1 2 0 8 . 4 (a)(4 ). A cco rd i n g l y, h i s asyl u m cl ai m fai l s. T h e r e c o r dd o e s n o t c o m p e l th e c o n c lu s io n th a t R o u s s e au ’s e x p e r ie n c e s w ith m i l i t a ntM us l i m s a nd the I ndone s i a n pol i c e , c um ul a t i ve l yc ons i de r e d, r i s e t o the le v e l o f p e r s e c u tio n . See Zehat ye v. G on zales , 453 F . 3d 1182, 1186 ( 9th C i r . 2006) ( E r i tr e a n gove rnm e nt ’ s s e i z ur e of f a the r ’ s bus i ne s s , a l ong w i th s om e de gr e e of soci alostra ci sm , di d n otri se t o the l evelof pers ec ut i on ); H al i m v. H older , 590 F . 3d 971, 975- 76 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( in c id e n ts s u f f e r e db ye th n ic C h in e s e p e titio n e rin Indo nesi a, consi dere d i n the aggregat e, di d n otam ou ntt o p er se cut i on ). F urther, e ve n unde radi s f

a vor e d gr oup a na l y s i s , the r e c or d doe s notc om pe l the c onc l us i on tha tR ous s e au e s t abl i s he d ac l e a rpr obabi l i tyof pe r s e c ut i on, be c aus e he di d not d e m o n s tr a te s u f

f ic ie n t in d iv idu a liz e dr is k . Se e H a lim , 590 F . 3d a t977- 80; W a kka ry , 55 8 F . 3d at10 66 (“ [a ] n app l i cantfor w i thh ol di ng of re m ov alw i l l need3 09- 71587

to a d du c e ac o n s id e r ab lylar g e rq u a n tu m o f in d iv idu a liz e d - r is ke v id e n c e ” ) . A cco rd i n g l y, R o u sseau ’ s w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m fai l s. F i nal l y, subst ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s deni alof C A T re l i ef b e c au s e R o u s s e au f

a ile dto s h o w it is m o r e lik e lyth a n n o t h e w ill b e to rtu r e dw ith th e c o n s e n t o ra c q u ie s c e n c e o f th e g o v e rn m e n t if

r e tu rn e dto I n d o n e s ia . See W a kka ry , 558 F . 3d a t1067- 68. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.