alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# ACTION:

Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# Time and Place: 

Thursday, February 11, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

# Open Agenda Items:

Item No. 1: Ex-Im Bank Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee for 2010.

# Public Participation:

 The meeting will be open to public observation for Item No. 1 only.

# Further Information: 

For further information, contact: Office of the Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (202) 565-3957.

Jonathan J. Cordone,

Senior Vice President, and General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-2848 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 9- 14 80

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Pet er R. Wrig ht
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Ju dg e Fra nk Mag il l; Henn ep in Co un ty 4th Dis tri ct Co ur t
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lDefe nd

an ts - App el le es

__

__ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta

__

__ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Octo be r 2, 2 01 9 Fi le d: Octo be r 7, 2 01 9 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re GRUENDER, STRAS, an d KOBES, Ci rcu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Pet er Wrig ht ap pe al s th e di st r i c t c o u rt’s di sm is sa l of hi s ci vi l act io n rai si ng 1 cl ai ms r e l at ed to an un su cces sf ul act io n he br ou gh t in st at e co ur t. Afte r care fu l

rev ie w of th e reco rd an d th e pa rti es ’ arg um en ts on ap pe al , we co nc lu de th at di sm is sa l

was pr op er. Se e Mir el es v. W ac o , 50 2 U.S. 9, 11 -1 2 (1 99 1) (p er cu ria m ) (d is cu ss in g jud ic ia l imm

un it y ); H a r r i s v. Mo. Co ur t of App ea ls , 78 7 F.2 d 42 7, 42 9 (8 th Ci r. 19 86 ) (s ta ti ng th at st at e co ur ts po ss es s Elev en th Am en dm en t imm un i ty). Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm
. Se e 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Jo hn R. Tun he im , Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d St ate s D ist ric t Co ur t fo r 1 th e Dis tri ct of Mi nn es ot a, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco m m en da ti on s of th e Hon or ab le St ev en E. Rau, Un it edSta te s M ag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct of M in ne so ta

. -2

-
#### May Cummings, appellee, v. Maggie C. Windham, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,645.

Opinion filed December 31, 1929.

Rehearing denied January 10, 1930.

Henry C. Ferguson, for appellant; A. G. Rosenbaum, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIndependent Orbiter Assessment (IOA): Assessment of the nose wheel steering subsystemThe results of the Independent Orbiter Assessment (IOA) of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Critical Items List (CIL) are presented. The IOA effort first completed an analysis of the Nose Wheel Steering (NWS) hardware, generating draft failure modes and potential critical items. To preserve independence, this analysis was accomplished without reliance upon the results contained within the NASA FMEA/CIL documentation. The IOA results were then compared to the proposed NASA post 51-L FMEA/CIL baseline. A resolution of each discrepancy from the comparison is provided through additional analysis as required. This report documents the results of that comparison for the Orbiter NWS hardware.Document ID19900001631Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMediavilla, Anthony Scott*(McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 11, 1988Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberREPT-1.0-WP-VA88003-22NASA-CR-185533NAS 1.26:185533Accession Number90N10947Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17650Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900001631.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification Pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Jeffrey L. Gregg, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Riddell BellHoldings, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluations; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: November 15, 2005 /s/ Jeffrey L. Gregg             Jeffrey L. Gregg    Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
§ 1738.208 Award determinations. ( a ) If the loan or loan/grant combination application meets all statutory and regulatory requirements and the feasibility study demonstrates that the Net worth and TIER, CR, or DSCR requirements in § 1738.206(b)(2)(i) can be satisfied and the business plan is sustainable, the application will be submitted to the Agency's credit committees for consideration according to the priorities in § 1738.105. Such submission of an application to the Agency's credit committees does not guarantee that a loan or loan/grant combination will be approved. In making a loan and/or loan/grant combination Award determination, the Administrator shall consider the recommendations of the credit committees.
( b ) The Applicant will be notified of the Agency's decision in writing. If the Agency does not approve the loan or loan/grant combination, a rejection letter will be sent to the Applicant, and the application will be returned with an explanation of the reasons for the rejection.
|  | Networking...
The lobby area of the Hotel Inter-continental was a popularmeeting spot for Weed and Seed conference participants.  This document was last update on November 24, 2000 |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i.) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 25, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii.) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                        | 
|Date: February 23, 2012 |  | /s/ John H. Kispert                  
|                        |  | John H. Kispert                      
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1709.20 Member delegate clause.

Each grant agreement under this part shall provide that no member of Congress shall be admitted to any share or part of a grant program or any benefit that may arise there from, but this provision shall not be construed to bar as a contractor under a grant a publicly held corporation whose ownership might include a member of Congress.
(115 App. Div. 117)

#### APPELBAUM v. STAR FIRE INS. CO. OF LOUISVILLE. KY.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 19, 1906.

1. Insurance—Foreign Corporations—Service oe Process.

Laws 1892, p. 1945, c. 690, § 30, prohibits any foreign insurance company from transacting business in the state until it shall have appointed the superintendent of insurance its attorney, upon whom process may be served. *Held,*that where, in an action against a foreign insurance company, the superintendent of insurance admitted on behalf of defendant due service of process, defendant could not attack the service on the ground that it was not personally made on the superintendent.

2. Judgment—Default—Vacation.

Where, in an action against a foreign insurance company, the commissioner of insurance sent the summons and complaint to defendant, at its home office, but the papers were mislaid, whereby defendant failed to enter its appearance in time, it was proper for the court to open defendant’s default.

Appeal from Special Term, New York County.

Action by Philip Appelbaum against the Star Fire Insurance Company of Louisville, ICy. From an order opening defendant’s default, and allowing it to come in and defend the action, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before O’BRIEN, P. J., and INGRAHAM, CLARKE, HOUGHTON, and SCOTT, JJ.

James A. Douglas, for appellant.

S. J. Rosenblum, for respondent.

INGRAHAM, J.

This action was commenced against a foreign insurance company to recover for a loss covered by a policy of insurance. Process was served upon the superintendent of insurance at Albany on the 1st day of June, 1906, and service of process was duly admitted by him under section 30 of the"insurance law (chapter 690, p. 1945, of the Laws of 1892). It appears that the commissioner of insurance sent the summons and complaint served on him to the defendant at its home office which was duly received, but mislaid; and, in consequence of that mistake appearance was not entered in time. The defendant claims that the service was irregular because it was not made personally upon the superintendent of insurance, but the superintendent admitted, on behalf of the defendant, due service of the summons and complaint, and we think there can be no question but that the service was regular. The motion to set aside the judgment on account of irregular service should not have been granted. The relief asked for by the defendant. was also to open his default and allow him to come in and defend, and, as the court imposed terms as a condition for allowing the defendant to answer, it is quite apparent that the' *748motion that was granted was to open the default, and not to set aside the judgment, upon the ground that the service of process was irregular. We think it was quite proper for the court to open the default under the circumstances. There was no question as to the solvency of the defendant, and that the terms imposed by the court were sufficiently onerous.

It follows that the order appealed from opening the default, and allowing the defendant to come and defend the action, should be affirmed,, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
#### Harold Fandorf, by Walter Fandorf, his father and next friend, defendant in error, v. Lawrence Quirici and The Whistle Bottling Company, defendants, on writ of error of Lawrence Quirici, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 33,689.

Opinion filed January 6, 1930.

Meek & McDonald, for plaintiff in error. Daniel M. Dever and James T. Moore, for defendant in error; Daniel V. Gallery, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1735 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1735

To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide for 
  participation in the Exchange of the President, Vice President, and 
 Executive cabinet officials in same manner as Members of Congress and 
                          Congressional staff.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2013

 Mr. Cassidy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to provide for 
  participation in the Exchange of the President, Vice President, and 
 Executive cabinet officials in same manner as Members of Congress and 
                          Congressional staff.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``In It All Together Act''.

SEC. 2. PARTICIPATION OF PRESIDENT, VICE PRESIDENT, AND EXECUTIVE 
              CABINET OFFICIALS IN THE EXCHANGE IN SAME MANNER AS 
              MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND CONGRESSIONAL STAFF.

    (a) In General.--Section 1312(d)(3)(D) of the Patient Protection 
and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18032(d)(3)(D)) is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by inserting ``; application to 
        president, vice president, and executive cabinet officials'' 
        after ``in the exchange''; and
    (b) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                            ``(iii) Application to president, vice 
                        president, and executive cabinet officials.--
                        Clause (i) shall apply to the President, Vice 
                        President, and an individual occupying a 
                        position listed in section 5312 of title 5, 
                        United States Code, in the same manner as it 
                        applies to a Member of Congress.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in enactment of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act.
                                 <all>
```
namg_ex102.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2


 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  




 





 




  





3











  




 





 




  





4











  










 





 




  





5











  






 





 




  





6











  




 





 




  





7











  








 





 


 


 8
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 17

- 00850

- CR Jordan Christopher GARCIA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR11931 Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 21, 2018
DIS MISSED The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain

case, an d the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the underlying case is a plea

- bargain case. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part04

- 17

- 00850

- CR

- 2

- of the record under these rules.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d). On February 8, 2018, we ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that the appella nt has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by March 9, 2018. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). No response was filed. In the absence of an amended trial court certification showing that the appellant has the right of appeal, rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit
32.1




Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)




I, Paul
J. Crecca, President and Chief Executive Officer of Haights Cross
Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code) that,




(1) The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Form
10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
      May 29, 2009
              
              /s/ Paul
      J. CreccaPaul
      J. CreccaPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer




A SIGNED
ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO HAIGHTS CROSS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND WILL BE
RETAINED BY HAIGHTS CROSS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1423.12 Application, inspection, and annual agreement fees.

Each warehouse operator not licensed under USWA shall pay to CCC a fee or fees, including an application fee, inspection fee, and an annual agreement fee for each warehouse approved by CCC or for which approval is sought. The terms and conditions of such fees will be set forth in the applicable agreement.