alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors of
Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the
accompanying Management's Report on the Effectiveness of the
Internal Control Structure Relative to the Servicing of Automobile
Loan Receivables, that Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B. (the "Bank")
maintained an effective internal control structure over financial
reporting relative to the servicing of automobile loan receivables
owned by Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trusts Series  1997-3, 1997-4,
1998-1, 1998-2, 2000-1, 2000-2, 2001-1 and 2001-2 (collectively
referred to as the "Trusts" herein) as of September 30, 2001.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of the internal
control structure over financial reporting, testing, and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of the internal control structure,
and such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control structure,
errors or irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also,
projections of any evaluation of the internal control structure over
financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the
internal control structure may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank maintained an
effective internal control structure over financial reporting relative to
the servicing of automobile receivables owned by the Bank's
automobile loan Trusts as of September 30, 2001, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based upon criteria established in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the
board of directors and management of the Bank, MBIA Insurance
Corporation, U.S. Bank National Association, AMBAC Indemnity
Corporation, Fitch IBCA, Moody's Investment Services, Standard &
Poor's and Financial Guaranty Insurance Company, and should not
be used for any other purpose.


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Vienna, VA
October 17, 2001
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Dennis J. Simonis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-K of M. L. Macadamia Orchards, L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(efor theregistrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlsover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  April 12, 2007
| /s/                                    | Dennis J.  Simonis |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                                   |
| Dennis J.  Simonis                     |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Norman C. Darling, Appellant, v Christine M. Darling, Respondent.

— Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to Ontario County Family Court, Cribb J., to make findings pursuant to CPLR 4213 and section 165 of the Family Court Act. (Appeal from order of Ontario County Family Court — custody.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Reimagining School Safety: A Guide for Schools and Districts      

# Resource: Reimagining School Safety: A Guide for Schools and Districts

This guide (PDF, 41 pages) helps education professionals reimagine and redefine school safety such that safety is not the absence of a negative but rather the existence of positive elements like interconnection, belonging, voice, and agency. The guide centers the lived experiences of students and families—especially those who have been kept furthest from institutional power. It provides educators, school leaders, and district administrators with mindsets, strategies, and grounded examples of what is possible by reimagining school safety. **Learn more.**
Exhibit 32


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





In connection with the quarterly report of Andain, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: August 21, 2011

/s/ Sam Shlomo ElimelechSam Shlomo Elimelech, President(principal executive officer)
 Dated: August 21, 2011

/s/ Gai Mar-ChaimGai Mar-Chaim, Secretary/Treasurer(principal financial and accounting officer)
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Spansion Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



| | (i.) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 28, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii.) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 28, 2010



/s/ John H. KispertJohn H. KispertPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1855 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1855

To require the Secretary of Defense to establish a process to determine 
whether individuals claiming certain service in the Philippines during 
World War II are eligible for certain benefits despite not being on the 
                 Missouri List, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2013

 Ms. Hanabusa (for herself, Ms. Chu, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Rangel, Mr. 
  Moran, Ms. Norton, Ms. Gabbard, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Brady of 
  Pennsylvania, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Heck of Nevada, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. 
    Honda, Mr. Peters of California, and Mr. Takano) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
  Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Defense to establish a process to determine 
whether individuals claiming certain service in the Philippines during 
World War II are eligible for certain benefits despite not being on the 
                 Missouri List, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF CERTAIN SERVICE IN PHILIPPINES DURING WORLD 
              WAR II.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs and such military historians as the 
Secretary of Defense considers appropriate, shall establish a process 
to determine whether a covered individual served as described in 
subsection (a) or (b) of section 107 of title 38, United States Code, 
for purposes of determining whether such covered individual is eligible 
for benefits described in such subsections.
    (b) Covered Individuals.--For purposes of this section, a covered 
individual is any individual who--
            (1) claims service described in subsection (a) or (b) of 
        section 107 of title 38, United States Code; and
            (2) is not included in the Approved Revised Reconstructed 
        Guerilla Roster of 1948, known as the ``Missouri List''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1826 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for real property or for a project 

or program named for an individual then serving as a Member of Congress, including a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to Congress, or 

as President. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2013 

Mr. MCCAUL (for himself, Mr. AMASH, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. MCKINLEY, and 

Mr. BRADY of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for real property or 

for a project or program named for an individual then 

serving as a Member of Congress, including a Delegate 

or Resident Commissioner to Congress, or as President. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Monuments to Me 

5 Act of 2013’’. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1826 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN FEDERAL FUNDS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—No Federal funds may be used 

3 for real property (including structures, buildings, or other 

4 infrastructure) or for a project or program named for an 

5 individual then serving as a Member of Congress, includ6 ing a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress, 

7 or as President. 

8 (b) EXCEPTION.—This section shall not apply with 

9 respect to any Presidential library. 

10 SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY. 

11 Section 2 shall not apply with respect to any project 

12 or program commenced, or any real property named, prior 

13 to the date of the enactment of this Act, regardless of 

14 whether the authorization for such project or program or 

15 for the use of such real property has expired. 

Æ 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Tommy Chou, Respondent, v Pan-Chin Chou, Appellant.

— In a divorce action, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 20, 1978, as corrected by an order dated November 28, 1978, as denied her motion to vacate a default judgment of divorce granted to the plaintiff on October 27, 1978, or to stay implementation of its provisions. Order, as corrected, reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, motion granted, and judgment vacated. The action shall be consolidated with the action commenced by the defendant entitled Pan-Chin Chou v Tommy Sha-Sen Chou. The interests of justice require that the order, as corrected, be reversed insofar as appealed from and the defendant’s motion granted (see *Munkacsi v Munkacsi,*4 AD2d 854; *Vanderhorst v Vanderhorst,*282 App Div 312). We would be remiss in this case if we did not condemn the conduct of defendant’s former attorney in defaulting and creating a situation in which his client’s right to a trial on the merits of her cause could be salvaged only by our resort to interests of justice analysis. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ., concur.
§ 1710.603 Sequence of advances. ( a ) Except as set forth in paragraph (b) of this section, concurrent loan funds will be advanced in the following order: ( 1 ) Fifty (50) percent of the RUS insured loan funds.
( 2 ) One hundred (100) percent of the supplemental loan funds.
( 3 ) The remaining amount of the RUS insured loan funds.
( b ) At the borrower's request and with RUS approval, all or part of the supplemental loan funds may be advanced before funds in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T22:54:17-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
§ 1738.301 General. ( a ) To be eligible for a loan guarantee, the Applicant must submit an application that meets the requirements in this part along with the requirements as stated in 7 CFR part 4279, subparts A and B, as well as any additional requirements published in the Federal Register.
( b ) The Agency may approve Rural Broadband Program loan guarantees in excess of $10 million but less than $25 million when the project meets one of the priorities in § 1738.105(a)(3)(i).
( c ) The lender will service the loan in accordance with 7 CFR part 4287, subpart B.
( d ) Any reference to priorities in 7 CFR part 4279 or 4287 shall have the meaning as stated in § 1738.105 and any reference to Administrator or Agency shall have the meaning as defined in § 1738.2.
#### §§ 1740.29-1740.41 [Reserved]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCompact finite volume methods for the diffusion equationAn approach to treating initial-boundary value problems by finite volume methods is described, in which the parallel between differential and difference arguments is closely maintained. By using intrinsic geometrical properties of the volume elements, it is possible to describe discrete versions of the div, curl, and grad operators which lead, using summation-by-parts techniques, to familiar energy equations as well as the div curl = 0 and curl grad = 0 identities. For the diffusion equation, these operators describe compact schemes whose convergence is assured by the energy equations and which yield both the potential and the flux vector with second order accuracy. A simplified potential form is especially useful for obtaining numerical results by multigrid and alternating direction implicit (ADI) methods. The treatment of general curvilinear coordinates is shown to result from a specialization of these general results.Document ID19900012252Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRose, Milton E.*(North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State Univ. Greensboro, NC, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 16, 1989Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186477NASA-CR-186477JCP-4406Accession Number90N21568Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-812Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900012252.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### William C. Parrott *v.*Charles T. Meacham

*Francis A. Smith, Jr.,*for the appellee (defendant).

*Thomas D. Clifford,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

Argued May 4

decided May 4, 1971

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is denied.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1759 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to submit to Congress quarterly reports on the timeliness in 

which the Department of Veterans Affairs receives certain information 

from other departments or agencies of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2013 

Mr. RUIZ (for himself, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Mr. BARBER, Mrs. 

NEGRETE MCLEOD, Mr. TAKANO, and Mr. COOK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit to Congress quarterly reports on the timeliness in which the Department 

of Veterans Affairs receives certain information from 

other departments or agencies of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. QUARTERLY REPORTS TO CONGRESS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 77 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new section: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1759 IH

1 ‘‘§ 7735. Quarterly reports to Congress 

2 ‘‘(a) REPORTS.—Not later than 30 days after the end 

3 of each fiscal quarter, the Secretary shall submit to Con4 gress a report on covered requests. 

5 ‘‘(b) MATTERS INCLUDED.—Each report under sub6 section (a) shall include— 

7 ‘‘(1) the number of covered requests made dur8 ing the fiscal quarter covered by the report; and 

9 ‘‘(2) the average response time for such covered 

10 requests made during each month of such fiscal 

11 quarter, as determined based on the period begin12 ning on the date on which the Secretary made the 

13 request and ending on the date on which the Sec14 retary determines that the request is completed. 

15 ‘‘(c) COVERED REQUEST DEFINED.—In this section, 

16 the term ‘covered request’ means a request by the Sec17 retary to the head of another department or agency of the 

18 United States for information required by the Secretary 

19 in adjudicating a claim for disability compensation under 

20 chapter 11 of this title.’’. 

21 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

22 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

23 after the item relating to section 7734 the following new 

24 item: 

‘‘7735. Quarterly reports to Congress.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Nicor
Inc.


Form
10-K


Exhibit
32.01





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Nicor Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)           the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the twelve
month period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  February
      25, 2009
            
            /s/
      RUSS M. STROBELRuss
      M. StrobelChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer
M. P. No. 79-322.

#### Town of South Kingstown *v.*Rhode Island Oil Co., Inc. *et al.*

*Mark S. Spangler,*for petitioner. *Hogan ir Hogan, Donald J. Packer, Thomas*S. *Packer,*for respondents.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.