alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit
Fund VI, L.P., Series 14 (the  "Partnership") for the quarter ended December 31,
2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  I,  Thomas  J.  Riha,  Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
July 26, 2006
§ 1738.152 Interest rates. ( a ) Direct cost-of-money loans shall bear interest at a rate equal to the cost of borrowing to the Department of Treasury for obligations of comparable maturity unless the project qualifies for a reduced interest rate as detailed in § 1738.102. The applicable interest rate will be set at the time of each advance.
( b ) The interest rate for Applicants receiving payment assistance or Substantially Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA) consideration will be set at the time of the Award.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of HOMASSIST CORPORATION (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Irene Braham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Irene Braham

Date: June 14, 2006               Irene Braham

Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Good Behavior Game      

# Resource: Good Behavior Game

This report (PDF, 21 pages) summarizes the available evidence on the effects of Good Behavior Game on student and teacher outcomes. The Good Behavior Game is a classroom management strategy that aims to improve social skills, minimize disruptive behaviors, and create a positive learning environment. **Learn more.**
#### State Division of Human Rights on the Complaint of Dolores Hierl and Others, Respondents, v Sweet Home Education Association, Petitioner. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Determination of appeal board unanimously confirmed, without costs. Same memorandum as in *State Div. of Human Rights v Sweet Home Cent. School Dist. Bd. of Educ.*(73 AD2d 823). (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present—Simons, J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
§ 15d.4 Compliance. ( a ) *Compliance program.* OASCR shall evaluate each agency's efforts to comply with this part and shall make recommendations for improving such efforts. ( 1 ) OASCR shall oversee the compliance reviews and evaluations, and issue compliance reports that monitor compliance efforts to ensure that there is equitable and fair treatment in conducted programs.
( 2 ) OASCR shall monitor all settlement agreements pertaining to program complaints for compliance to ensure full implementation and enforcement.
( 3 ) OASCR shall oversee Agency Head Assessments to ensure that Agency Heads are in compliance with civil rights laws and regulations.
( 4 ) OASCR shall monitor all findings of non-compliance to ensure that compliance is achieved.
( 5 ) OASCR shall require agencies to collect the race, ethnicity and gender of applicants and program participants, who choose to provide such information on a voluntary basis, in USDA-conducted programs, for purposes of civil rights compliance oversight, and evaluation.
( b ) *Agency data collection and compliance reports.* ( 1 ) Each Agency shall, for civil rights compliance, collect, maintain and annually compile data on all program applicants and participants in conducted programs by county and State, including but not limited to, application and participation rate data regarding socially disadvantaged and limited resources applicants and participants. At a minimum, the data should include: ( i ) Numbers of applicants and participants by race, ethnicity, and gender, subject to appropriate privacy protections, as determined by the Secretary and in accordance with law; and
( ii ) The application and participation rate, by race, ethnicity, and gender, as a percentage of the total participation rate.
( 2 ) Each Agency shall submit to the OASCR timely, complete and accurate program application and participation reports containing the information described in § 15d.4(b)(1), on an annual basis, and upon the request of the OASCR independently of the annual requirement.
( c ) *Complaint reporting compliance.* OASCR shall ensure compliance with mandated complaint reporting requirements, such as those required by section 14006 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-246).
[79 FR 41411, July 16, 2014]
§ 1717.653 Borrowers in default. Any borrower not in compliance with all provisions of its mortgage, loan contract, or any other agreements with RUS must, unless the borrower's mortgage, loan contract, or other agreement with RUS specifically provides otherwise with respect to such a borrower: ( a ) Obtain prior written approval from the Administrator to invest its own funds or to make loans or guarantees regardless of the aggregate amount of such investments, loans, or guarantees; and
( b ) If requested by the Administrator, restructure or reduce the amount of its investments, loans, and guarantees to a level determined by the Administrator, in his or her sole discretion, to be in the financial interest of the government with respect to loan security and/or repayment. If the borrower does not so restructure or reduce its portfolio within a reasonable period of time determined by the Administrator, which shall not exceed 12 months from the date the borrower was notified of the required action, then, upon written notice from RUS, the borrower shall be in default of its RUS loan contract and mortgage.
#### § 160.15 New standards.

Whenever in the opinion of the Administrator a new standard for any naval stores is necessary in the interest of the trade, he shall announce a hearing thereon, to be held not less than 3 months subsequent to such announcement. Notice of the hearing stating the terms or description of the proposed new standard, or a summary thereof, shall be given by publication in the Federal Register and by such other means as may be practicable. The hearing shall be conducted by an official designated by the Administrator, and reasonable opportunity shall be afforded at the hearing to all interested persons to present their views, arguments and data, verbally or in writing, in favor of or in opposition to the proposed new standard. All relevant material presented at said hearing, or a summary thereof, and a recommendation as to adoption or rejection of the proposed new standard shall be transmitted to the Administrator for his consideration. A new standard established and promulgated by the Administrator shall become effective not less than 3 months after the promulgation thereof.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 30, 2012 

y0123 

Order 

 

January 30, 2012 

143880 

DAVID YOUMANS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143880 

 COA: 297275 

Wayne CC: 09-018409-NI 

BWA PROPERTIES, L.L.C., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
§ 1734.42 Non-approved purposes for loans. ( a ) Loans made under this subpart will not be provided to pay the costs of recurring or operating expenses incurred after two years from approval of the project except for leases (see § 1734.41).
( b ) Loans made under this subpart will not be provided for any of the following costs: ( 1 ) To purchase equipment that will be owned by the local exchange carrier or another telecommunications service provider, unless the applicant is the local exchange carrier or other telecommunications service provider;
( 2 ) To duplicate facilities providing distance learning or telemedicine services in place or to reimburse the applicant or others for costs incurred prior to RUS' receipt of the completed application;
( 3 ) For projects located in areas covered by the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*); or
( 4 ) To pay for salaries, wages, or administrative expenses; or
( 5 ) For any purpose that the Administrator has not specifically approved.
( c ) Except as otherwise provided in § 1734.12, funds shall not be used to finance a project, in part, when the success of the project is dependent upon the receipt of additional financial assistance under this subpart D or is dependent upon the receipt of other funding that is not assured.
Order entered April 30, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00380-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.M., A CHILD,

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-12986

ORDER

Appellant’s brief in this case was due on March 27, 2013. On March 28, 2013, appellant 

tendered her brief to the Court. By postcard dated the same day, we notified appellant that her 

brief had been received but had not been filed because the brief had been tendered to the Court 

after the due date. We directed appellant to file an extension motion within ten days so that the 

Court could consider the brief. To date, appellant has not filed an extension motion. Further, 

after reviewing the brief appellant tendered to the Court, we have determined it does not meet the 

general requirements of rule 38 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

Accordingly, appellant is ORDERED to file, within ten days of the date of this order, 

both (1) an amended brief that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1, and (2) an 

extension motion that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a) and 10.5(b). We 

expressly CAUTION appellant that if the amended brief and extension motion are not timely 
filed, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTheory of biaxial graded-index optical fiberA biaxial graded-index fiber with a homogeneous cladding is studied. Two methods, wave equation and matrix differential equation, of formulating the problem and their respective solutions are discussed. For the wave equation formulation of the problem it is shown that for the case of a diagonal permittivity tensor the longitudinal electric and magnetic fields satisfy a pair of coupled second-order differential equations. Also, a generalized dispersion relation is derived in terms of the solutions for the longitudinal electric and magnetic fields. For the case of a step-index fiber, either isotropic or uniaxial, these differential equations can be solved exactly in terms of Bessel functions. For the cases of an istropic graded-index and a uniaxial graded-index fiber, a solution using the Wentzel, Krammers and Brillouin (WKB) approximation technique is shown. Results for some particular permittivity profiles are presented. Also the WKB solutions is compared with the vector solution found by Kurtz and Streifer. For the matrix formulation it is shown that the tangential components of the electric and magnetic fields satisfy a system of four first-order differential equations which can be conveniently written in matrix form. For the special case of meridional modes, the system of equations splits into two systems of two equations. A general iterative technique, asymptotic partitioning of systems of equations, for solving systems of differential equations is presented. As a simple example, Bessel's differential equation is written in matrix form and is solved using this asymptotic technique. Low order solutions for particular examples of a biaxial and uniaxial graded-index fiber are presented. Finally numerical results obtained using the asymptotic technique are presented for particular examples of isotropic and uniaxial step-index fibers and isotropic, uniaxial and biaxial graded-index fibers.Document ID19900017336Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeThesis/DissertationAuthorsKawalko, Stephen F.*(Chicago Univ. Chicago, IL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186882NASA-CR-186882Accession Number90N26652Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG2-544Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017336.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Appeal No. 80-49.

#### Star Street Area Neighborhood Ass’n *v.*City of Pawtucket Board of Zoning Appeals.

*Stone, Clifton*¿r *Clifton, Walter R. Stone,*for plaintiff.

The plaintiff herein has appealed from an order of the Superior Court upholding a ruling of the Pawtucket Board of Zoning Appeals. There is no right of appeal from such an order. *Bassi*v. *Zoning Board of Review,*107 R.I. 702, 271 A.2d 210 (1970).

Therefore, the plaintiffs appeal is denied and dismissed and the papers are remanded to the Superior Court.
1 Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no pre cedential value and merely decide particular cases on

the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-20714 Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

MARIA MARTA CISNEROS,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(CR-H-95-195-4)

______________________________________________________ (October 10, 1995) Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Appellant, Maria Marta Cisneros, challenges the conditions

fixed by the district court for her r elease by having filed a

notice of appeal from that order and by filing in this Court an

Emergency Motion For Release Pending Trial. The motion is denied

and the order appealed from affirmed.

Cisneros was indicted for conspiracy to assist and attempting

to assist the escape of certain convicted felons from two Texas

county jails, and for assisting two of them to prevent or hinder2

their punishment. At her initial appearance the magistrate judge

set her bond at $5,000,000 and ordered detention until the bond was

posted. Appellant moved for review. The district court granted

the motion, held a hearing and thereafter conditioned her release

upon posting a cash or surety bond of $5,000,000. He found that,

considering the charges, the proximity to the border and the fact

that conviction w ould carry a substantial prison sentence, there

was substantial risk that Appellant would flee, and that she was a

danger to the community.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence

supporting her detention and the factual findings of the district

court. Appellant has not furnished a transcript of the detention

hearing. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 9(a) requires that an

appellant who questions the factual basis for the district court's

order file a transcript of any release proceedings in the district

court or an explanation of why a transcript has not been obtained.

Rule 9.3 of this Court implements the Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure. Cisneros' counsel, in a letter to this Court, states

that obtaining a transcript of the hearing would cause undue delay

and asks this Court to proceed without a transcript. We are

obviously unable to reexamine the sufficiency of the evidence and

whether or not it supports the factual findings of the district

court without a t ranscript. Accordingly, Appellant's motion for

release pending trial is DENIED and the decision of the district

court is AFFIRMED.3
§ 15a.425 Counseling and use of appraisal and counseling materials. ( a ) *Counseling.* A recipient shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of sex in the counseling or guidance of students or applicants for admission.
( b ) *Use of appraisal and counseling materials.* A recipient that uses testing or other materials for appraising or counseling students shall not use different materials for students on the basis of their sex or use materials that permit or require different treatment of students on such basis unless such different materials cover the same occupations and interest areas and the use of such different materials is shown to be essential to eliminate sex bias. Recipients shall develop and use internal procedures for ensuring that such materials do not discriminate on the basis of sex. Where the use of a counseling test or other instrument results in a substantially disproportionate number of members of one sex in any particular course of study or classification, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination in the instrument or its application.
( c ) *Disproportion in classes.* Where a recipient finds that a particular class contains a substantially disproportionate number of individuals of one sex, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination on the basis of sex in counseling or appraisal materials or by counselors.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1775 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1775

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  issue an order with respect to secondary cockpit barriers, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2013

 Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself, Ms. Schwartz, Mr. Marino, Mr. Brady of 
   Pennsylvania, Mr. Grimm, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Barletta, Mr. 
 Fattah, and Mr. Cartwright) introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  issue an order with respect to secondary cockpit barriers, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saracini Aviation Safety Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall issue an 
order that--
            (1) requires, on each commercial aircraft operating under 
        part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, the 
        installation of a barrier, other than the cockpit door, that 
        prevents access to the flight deck of an aircraft; and
            (2) requires, for an aircraft--
                    (A) that is equipped with a cockpit door, that the 
                barrier required under paragraph (1) remain locked 
                while--
                            (i) the aircraft is in flight; and
                            (ii) the cockpit door separating the flight 
                        deck and the passenger area is open; and
                    (B) that is not equipped with a cockpit door, that 
                the barrier required under paragraph (1) remain locked 
                as determined appropriate by the pilot in command.
                                 <all>
```