alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Johnson *v.*The State.

*Indictment for Resisting an Officer,.*

1. *Warrant of arrest; when sufficient.*— A warrant of arrest issued by a justice of the peace for an assault and battery, which is signed by the justice with his name and the initials of his office, is directed “to any constable of the county,” states the county in which it was issued, the defendant’s name, and the offense charged by its general designation, conforms substantially to the requirements of the statute (Code of 1876, §§ 4651-2), and constitutes on its face a legal warrant.

2. *Smne.*— The omission from such, a warrant of the pronoun *me*after the word “before,” in stating before whom the complaint was made, is a mere clerical misprision, and does not vitiate the warrant-.

*22Appeal from Marengo Circuit Court.

Tried before ílon. wm. E. Clarke.

The indictment in this cause contains two counts, one charging the defendant with an assault and battery on George Carrington, and the other with resisting said Oai’rington, a constable of said comity, while attempting to execute a warrant of arrest issued by Leon Napier, a justice of the peace, for an assault and battery. The cause was tried, and the defendant convicted of the offense charged in the second count. On' the trial the prosecution was allowed to read in evidence, against the defendant’s objection, a warrant of arrest in the following language:

“ State of Ala., 1 Marengo Co. (

To any constable of the county: Complaint on oath having been made before — , that the offense of an assault and battery has been committed, and accusing Wiley Johnson [the defendant] thereof: You are, therefore, hereby commanded to arrest Wiley Johnson and bring him before me.

Nov. 1st, 1882. L. Napier, J. P.”

The court'also instructed the jury that said paper was, on its-face, a legal warrant, and authorized the said Carrington to arrest the defendant. To the ruling of the court in allowing the warrant to be read in evidence, and to the charge given, the defendant duly excepted.

E. MoCaa, for appellant.

H. C. Tompkins, Attorney-General; for the' State.

SOMERVILLE, J.

— There was no error in admitting in evidence the justice’s warrant, to which exception was taken, nor in the charge of the court, ruling that the instrument -was on its face a legal warrant. It substantially conforms to the requirements of sections 4651 and 4652 of the Code of 1876. It contains the *name of the defendant;*a statement of *the offense*charged *l>y name; the county*in which it was issued ; and was *signed*by the justice with *his name*and *initials of office;*and was directed “ to any constable of the county,” who must necessarily be a *lawful officer of the State,*within the meaning of the statute. — Code, 1876, §§ 4651-2; *Murphy's case, 55*Ala. 252; *Brown's case,*63 Ala. 97.

The omission-of the pronoun we, after the word “ before,” is a mere clerical misprision, which, being readily supplied by inspection, does not vitiate the instrument. It must, therefore, be construed to be understood.

Affirmed.
§ 1491.21 Funding. ( a ) Subject to the statutory limits, the State Conservationist, in coordination with the eligible entity, will determine the NRCS share of the cost of purchasing a conservation easement or other interest in the land.
( b ) NRCS may provide up to 50 percent of the appraised fair market value of the conservation easement consistent with § 1491.4(g). An eligible entity will share in the cost of purchasing a conservation easement in accordance with the limitations of this part.
( c ) A landowner may make donations toward the acquisition of the conservation easement.
( d ) The eligible entity must provide a minimum of 25 percent of the purchase price of the conservation easement.
( e ) FRPP funds may not be used for expenditures such as appraisals, surveys, title insurance, legal fees, costs of easement monitoring, and other related administrative and transaction costs incurred by the eligible entity.
( f ) NRCS will conduct its technical and administrative review of appraisals and its hazardous materials reviews with FRPP funds.
( g ) If the State Conservationist determines that the purchase of two or more conservation easements are comparable in achieving FRPP goals, the State Conservationist will not assign a higher priority to any one of these conservation easements solely on the basis of lesser cost to FRPP.
( h ) Environmental Services Credits: ( 1 ) NRCS asserts no direct or indirect interest in environmental credits that may result from or be associated with an FRPP easement;
( 2 ) NRCS retains the authority to ensure that the requirements for FRPP-funded easements are met and maintained consistent with this part; and
( 3 ) If activities required under an environmental credit agreement may affect land covered under a FRPP easement, landowners are encouraged to request a compatibility assessment from the eligible entity prior to entering into such agreements.
#### Frank H. Dickey *et al. v.*The City of Chicago.

*Opinion filed February 22, 1899*

*Rehearing denied April 7, 1899.*

This case is controlled by the decision in *Holden v. City of Chicago,*172 Ill. 263.

Writ of Error to the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Orrin R Carter, Judge presiding.

William F. Carroll, for plaintiffs in error.

Charles S. Thornton, Corporation Counsel, John A. May, and Armand F. Teefy, for defendant in error.

Per Curiam:

This is a writ of error to reverse a judgment of the county court of Cook county confirming" a special assessment. The ordinance providing for the improvement fails to state the height of the curb required to. be constructed on each side of the street, and on account of this defect it is claimed that the ordinance is invalid. The ordinance involved, as respects the height of the curb, is substantially like an ordinance held to be invalid in *Holden*v. *City of Chicago,*172 Ill. 263, and the ruling in that case must control here.

As to the property set out and 'described in the assignment of errors in the record the judgment of confirmation will be reversed and the cause will be remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7901

JIBRIL LUQMAN IBRAHIM, a/k/a Grant Anderson,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-95-676-R)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 29, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jibril Luqman Ibrahim, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motions for recusal and for leave to file a complaint for failing

to comply with a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Ibrahim v. United States,

No. CA-95-676-R (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NRIS-OKLAHOMA 

Oil and Gas • Wells 

Scale1:1,000,000 

NatJJral Resources Information System 

Your scwce tot OIU.Phom~ d.t• •rni•PPiicflionJ 

l'liiS !!'NIP Clfpi<W$ iPOIOXI!ni!$Y ZW,OOO" Oll"'lr.d SB;OOO~at MI COII'ICIItOCIM. N std ot' Pl.lllk rtcords tn.l Mtt b1Ci'to thf!. ttf:ly t900'1. Olg.ut otPI\I'I'!«A (091U Oft~en ~"'Ord t are lia!* e11 re~ut " a1!f.IVII'tVGEO.OtJ.EDO 

llt!dDnd etrt.ttd. from &ta P"'\116!<1 

byTopogttf)tlic Mtp.plf'IO Comp.any 

Oklillnma City. OK 

For ol:ddltiOtl<l'l an.lonlla~~on . co~ct. 

Goo Information Systems 

U~ ~tyol 0~1Al"uxn3 

t8J~ W t,;·u:l$,y1 $to~ 1ct\ 

N(II'I'I)IWt.. OK 7306Q.-A160 

Pb«<e: (~325-3131 

Tulsa-1\tluskogee-B<utlesville ~ 

'Mayes Com1ty 

CSA 

,-

Caddo County 

Oklahoma
§ 1714.9 Prepayment of insured loans. This section sets out provisions for prepayment of insured electric loans at face value. Provisions for discounted prepayment of RUS loans are set out in 7 CFR part 1786. ( a ) *Municipal rate loans.* Loan documents for municipal rate loans shall provide for the following: ( 1 ) *Prepayment on a rollover maturity date.* All, or a portion of, the outstanding balance on any advance from a municipal rate loan may be prepaid on any rollover maturity date pursuant to § 1714.6(a)(4).
( 2 ) *Prepayment on a date other than a rollover maturity date.* A borrower may elect at the time of loan approval to include a prepayment option (call provision) that will allow the borrower to prepay all, or a portion of, the outstanding balance on any advance on a date other than a rollover maturity date. Interest rates on advances from loans with a prepayment provision will be increased as set forth in § 1714.4(a).
( b ) *Hardship rate loans.* Loan documents for hardship loans shall provide that the loan may be prepaid at face value at any time without penalty.
#### § 160.57 Fees for licensed inspection permits.

Each accredited processor shall pay to the Department annually such permit fee for each eligible processing plant for which a permit has been issued, as may be prescribed by the Administrator.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Child Exploitation in Special Areas and Populations      

# Report: Child Exploitation in Special Areas and Populations

This report (PDF, 33 pages) explores the dynamics of combating child exploitation in these unique federal jurisdiction settings: Indian country, military installations, unaccompanied noncitizen minors entering the United States, cruise ships, and commercial flights. **Learn more** (PDF, 33 pages).
#### Rollin Coleman, appellee, v. Michael Wrobel et al., defendants, on appeal of Builders Bond & Mortgage Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,960.

Opinion filed December 31, 1929.

Joseph Rosenberg, for certain appellant; Philip R. Toomin, A. L. Stein and Everett Lewy, of counsel. Pritzker & Pritzker, for appellee; R. L. Freeman, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Joseph Di Russo, Respondent, v. Daniel Kravitz, Appellant.

[11443.]

In view of our decision in No. 11442, the appeal from the order

entered on November 29, 1963 is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements to either party. Concur—Steuer, Rabin and McNally, JJ.; Eager, J. P., and Capozzoli, J., concur on constraint of the determination of appeal No. 11442, decided herewith.
f10k2012ex10xxvii_yewbio.htm


Exhibit 10.27


 


Lease Contract







Lessor (Party A): Wang Zhiguo


Lessee (Party B): Heilongjiang JSJ Bio-Technology Development Co., Ltd







This Contract is enacted according to "Economic Contract Law of the People's Republic of China", in order to clarify both Parties’ rights and obligations through voluntary negotiation on the basis of equality and consensus, the Parties hereby agreed as follows:








	
1.  

	
Lease Property 

Party A agreed to lease the property located on 5th Floor, Zone B, Far East Building, No. 18 Hengshan Road, Xiangfang District with a usable area of 30 m2to Party B, and rent is RMB 10,000 per year.















	
2.  

	
Term of Lease 

The lease term shall be 3 years, from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2015.















	
3.  

	
Modification and Termination of Lease 

This Contract can be modified or terminated when both parties agree. Otherwise, any modification and termination will be deemed as breach of contract.















	
4.  

	
If the negotiation fails to resolve the controversy, each party or both parties may submit the outstanding issue to court in accordance with “Contract Law of the People's Republic of China”.












This agreement is in duplicate, each party will hold one copy.


 




	 	

Lessor: (Sign or Chop) Wang Zhiguo

	 
	 	 	 
	
 

	
Lessee: (Sign or Chop)

	 
	 	
Heilongjiang JSJ Bio-Technology Development Co. , Ltd

	 
	 	
Qi Guifang

	 
	 	 	 
	 	

July 1, 2012
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Apps Help Prevent Teen Pregnancy and Promote Youth Sexual Health      

# Resource: Apps Help Prevent Teen Pregnancy and Promote Youth Sexual Health

This slideshow highlights six free apps that can help youth avoid pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.

http://ncfy.acf.hhs.gov/media-center/slideshows/apps-help-prevent-teen-pregnancy-and-promote-youth-sexual-health?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1464.42 Access to agricultural operation or tract.

Any authorized NRCS representative will have the right to enter an agricultural operation or tract of land for the purposes of determining eligibility, conducting ranking and due diligence activities, and for ascertaining the accuracy of any representations related to agreement or contract performance. Access will include the right to provide technical assistance, determine eligibility, conduct ranking and onsite inspections prior to execution of an agreement or contract, inspect any actions undertaken under the agreement or contract, and collect information necessary to evaluate agreement or contract performance, as specified in the agreement or contract. The NRCS representative will attempt to contact the applicant or participant prior to exercising this provision.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Tom Spanier, certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the three months ended March 31, 2007 (the Report);



(2)

Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; and



(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods represented in the Report.



(4)

The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this Report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



(5)

The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):



(i)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(ii)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:  September 10, 2007



By:

/s/ Tom Spanier

Tom Spanier
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28619]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
    Title: Foreign Availability Procedures.
    OMB Control Number: 0694-0004.
    Form Number(s): N/A.
    Type of Request: Regular submission (extension of a currently 
approved information collection).
    Burden Hours: 510.
    Number of Respondents: 2.
    Average Hours per Response: 255.
    Needs and Uses: BIS's Office of Technology Evaluation (OTE) 
responds to requests by Congress and industry to make foreign 
availability determinations. OTE identifies foreign goods and 
technology analogous to American equipment subject to export controls. 
The U.S. and foreign equipment, however, must demonstrate a similarity 
of design or approach to the technical problems as well as exhibit 
similar performance and reliability characteristics. If the information 
merits an assessment, then it is used in that specific study of foreign 
availability. Continued restrictions on U.S. exports when comparable 
items are available from uncontrollable sources decreases U.S. 
competitiveness in high technology industries and undermines U.S. 
national security interests.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations; not-
for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Jasmeet Seehra, (202) 395-3123.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#32567a4b5c575972565d511c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="74103c0d1a111f34101b175a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB Desk Officer, via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#024863716f6767765d492c5d5167676a7063426d6f602c676d722c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9e3c8dac4ccccddf6e287f6faccccc1dbc8e9c6c4cb87ccc6d987cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>, or Fax to (202) 395-5167.

    Dated: November 9, 2010.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-28619 Filed 11-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Mary H. Clarey, defendant in error, v. Wilbur J. Hudler, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 8,040.

*642Opinion filed January 3, 1930.

Hyer & Gill, for plaintiff in error. Knight *&*Swenson, for defendant in error; James A. Penny, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Jett

delivered the opinion of the court.