alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFlare stars at radio wavelengthsThe radio emission from dMe flare stars is discussed using Very Large Array and Arecibo observations as examples. Active flare stars emit weak, unpolarized, quiescent radio radiation that may be always present. Although thermal bremsstrahlung and/or thermal gyroresonance radiation account for the slowly-varying, quiescent radio radiation of solar active regions, these processes cannot account for the long-wavelength quiescent radiation observed from nearby dMe flare stars. It has been attributed to nonthermal gyrosynchrotron radiation, but some as yet unexplained mechanism must be continually producing the energetic electrons. Long duration, narrow-band radiation is also emitted from some nearby dMe stars at 20 cm wavelength. Such radiation may be attributed to coherent plasma radiation or to coherent electron-cyclotron masers. Impulsive stellar flares exhibit rapid variations that require radio sources that are smaller than the star in size, and high brightness temperatures greater than 10(exp 15) K that are also explained by coherent radiation processes. Quasi-periodic temporal fluctuations suggest pulsations during some radio flares. Evidence for frequency structure and positive or negative frequency drifts during radio flares from dMe stars is also presented.Document ID19900012403Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLang, Kenneth R.*(Tufts Univ. Medford, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategorySpace RadiationReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186539NAS 1.26:186539Meeting InformationMeeting: IAU Symposium on Flare StarsLocation: Byurakan, ArmeniaCountry: USSRStart Date: October 23, 1989End Date: October 27, 1989Accession Number90N21719Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-501CONTRACT_GRANT: AF-AFOSR-0147-89Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900012403.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Carl J. Pasquantino et al., Respondents, v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Broughton, J. (And see *Buy For Less Wine & Liqs. v Commercial Union Ins. Co.,*63 AD2d 976.) (Appeal from *826order of Niagara Supreme Court—discovery.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Witmer and Moule, JJ.
Office of Adolescent Health | Website: http://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/TAG @TeenHealthGov Email: TAGTEAM@hhs.gov 

TAG in Action: Colorado 9to25

As part of its national call to action, Adolescent Health, Think, Act, GrowSM (TAG), the Office of Adolescent 

Health, in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service has identified a number of successful strategies

for improving adolescent health throughout the country. 

The Goal

Colorado 9to25 is a collective, action-oriented group of Colorado youth and adults working 

in partnership to align efforts and achieve positive outcomes for all youth, ages 9-25, so 

they can reach their full potential.

The Game 

Plan

Since 2010, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment has used federal 

Maternal and Child Health (MCH) block grant funding to build a youth system now known 

as Colorado 9to25 (CO9to25). In 2013, state legislation in Colorado directed the Colorado 

Department of Human Services to create a statewide youth development plan. Having 

partnered on CO9to25 since its inception, staff identified alignment between the legislative 

requirements and CO9to25’s existing work. 

With CO9to25 serving as the foundation of the legislated plan, community and state youth 

initiatives were reviewed across the state. CO9to25 then identified gaps and barriers to 

services, including: missing connections to adults, behavioral health needs, homelessness, 

disparities and stigma experienced by various populations, and a need for cross-systems 

coordination and collaboration. A nonprofit organization, The Civic Canopy, worked to 

maintain and enhance the CO9to25 infrastructure to align youth-serving programs, 

practices and policies across Colorado to address these gaps and promote positive youth 

development.

The 

Winning 

Plays

CO9to25 representatives modeled a positive youth development approach as they 

designed a plan for the entire state. Two key practices for engaging young people stood 

out: building upon the inherent interests and strengths of youth participants through 

preparation and debriefing to enhance their capacity to sit at the table, and facilitating 

meaningful engagement of youth in decision-making roles including changing meeting 

norms to make them more inclusive of young people’s needs. As one young woman said 

about the process, “It’s when there is give and take, and respect for diverse opinions that

we change the world. The Colorado Statewide Youth Development Plan gives us, the 

youth, a chance to be heard.”

Learn 

More 

Colorado 9to25

http://co9to25.org/
Report of Management on Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.'s Internal
Control Over the Preparation of Monthly Servicer's Certificates
Relative to the Servicing of Automobile Loan Receivables

December 1, 2004

We, as members of management of Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B., (the
Bank) are responsible for establishing and maintaining effective
internal control over the preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates
relative to the servicing of automobile loan receivables owned by Chevy
Chase Auto Receivables Trusts Series 2000-2, 2001-1 and 2001-2
(collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein).  Internal
control is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Bank's
management and board of directors regarding the preparation of reliable
monthly Servicer's Certificates.  Internal control over the preparation of
monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing of automobile
loan receivables owned by the Trusts includes self-monitoring
mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are
identified. Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, no
matter how well-designed, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur
and not be detected, including the possibility of the circumvention or
overriding of controls.  Accordingly, even effective internal control over
the preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing
of automobile loan receivables owned by the Trusts can provide only
reasonable assurance with respect to the monthly Servicer's Certificates
preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, internal control
effectiveness may vary over time.

The Bank assessed its internal control as of September 30, 2004 based on
criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described
in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, we assert that the Bank maintained effective internal
control over the preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to
the servicing of automobile loan receivables owned by the Trusts as of
September 30, 2004 based on the specified criteria.




  /s/  Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.         /s/ Mark A. Holles
------------------------------       ----------------------------
Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.			Mark A. Holles
Executive Vice President and Chief 	Group Vice President
Financial Officer

 /s/  Joel A. Friedman                /s/  Thomas E. Uglietta
------------------------------       ----------------------------
Joel A. Friedman			Thomas E. Uglietta
Senior Vice President and Controller 	Vice President
§ 1499.18 Audit requirements. ( a ) Subpart F, Audit Requirements, of 2 CFR part 200 applies to recipients and subrecipients under this part other than those that are for-profit entities, foreign public entities, or foreign organizations.
( b ) A recipient or subrecipient that is a for-profit entity or a foreign organization, and that expends, during its fiscal year, a total of at least the audit requirement threshold in 2 CFR 200.501 in Federal awards, is required to obtain an audit. Such a recipient or subrecipient has the following two options to satisfy this requirement: ( 1 ) ( i ) A financial audit of the agreement or subagreement, in accordance with the Government Auditing Standards issued by the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), if the recipient or subrecipient expends Federal awards under only one CCC program during such fiscal year; or
( ii ) A financial audit of all Federal awards from CCC, in accordance with GAO's Government Auditing Standards, if the recipient or subrecipient expends Federal awards under multiple CCC programs during such fiscal year; or
( 2 ) An audit that meets the requirements contained in subpart F of 2 CFR part 200.
( c ) A recipient or subrecipient that is a for-profit entity or a foreign organization, and that expends, during its fiscal year, a total that is less than the audit requirement threshold in 2 CFR 200.501 in Federal awards, is exempt from requirements under this section for an audit for that year, except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (f) of this section, but it must make records available for review by appropriate officials of Federal agencies.
( d ) CCC may require an annual financial audit of an agreement or subagreement when the audit requirement threshold in 2 CFR 200.501 is not met. In that case, CCC must provide funds under the agreement for this purpose, and the recipient or subrecipient, as applicable, must arrange for such audit and submit it to CCC.
( e ) When a recipient or subrecipient that is a for-profit entity or a foreign organization is required to obtain a financial audit under this section, it must provide a copy of the audit to CCC within 60 days after the end of its fiscal year.
( f ) CCC, the USDA Office of Inspector General, or GAO may conduct or arrange for additional audits of any recipients or subrecipients, including for-profit entities and foreign organizations. Recipients and subrecipients must promptly comply with all requests related to such audits. If CCC conducts or arranges for an additional audit, such as an audit with respect to a particular agreement, CCC will fund the full cost of such an audit, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.503(d).
#### § 160.30 Contents of containers to be designated.

Prior to inspection at the request of the producer, containers of naval stores, other than tank cars, shall have marked thereon a designation by such producer of the kind or identity of the product in accordance with the standard of identity provided therefor by or under the act.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1826 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1826

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for real property or for a project 
    or program named for an individual then serving as a Member of 
Congress, including a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to Congress, or 
                             as President.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2013

Mr. McCaul (for himself, Mr. Amash, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. McKinley, and Mr. 
 Brady of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of Federal funds for real property or for a project 
    or program named for an individual then serving as a Member of 
Congress, including a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to Congress, or 
                             as President.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Monuments to Me Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN FEDERAL FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--No Federal funds may be used for real property 
(including structures, buildings, or other infrastructure) or for a 
project or program named for an individual then serving as a Member of 
Congress, including a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the 
Congress, or as President.
    (b) Exception.--This section shall not apply with respect to any 
Presidential library.

SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY.

    Section 2 shall not apply with respect to any project or program 
commenced, or any real property named, prior to the date of the 
enactment of this Act, regardless of whether the authorization for such 
project or program or for the use of such real property has expired.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Annual Report of NL  Industries,  Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended  December  31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, Harold C. Simmons,
Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  and I,  Gregory M.  Swalwell,  Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Harold C. Simmons
    ----------------------------------
    Harold C. Simmons
    Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Gregory M. Swalwell
    ----------------------------------
    Gregory M. Swalwell
    Chief Financial Officer



May 31, 2005



Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
{"@context": "https://wayback.archive-it.org/16698/20210520143808/http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "item": {"@id": "https:\/\/wayback.archive-it.org\/16698\/20210520143808\/http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/usnationalarchives", "name": "US National Archives"}}]}

















© 2021 Google LLC
NO. 07-11-00085-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 23, 2011

CESAR DAN HERNANDEZ-SANDOVAL, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE 291ST DISTRICT COURT OF DALLAS COUNTY;

NO. F-0954675-U; HONORABLE SUSAN LYNN HAWK, JUDGE

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND**

Appellant, Cesar Dan Hernandez-Sandoval, appeals from conviction for the offense of murder, and sentence of life imprisonment.[footnoteRef:1]  Appellant filed notice of appeal on December 14, 2010.  The appellate record was due to be filed by December 17, 2010. [1:  Because no clerk’s record has been filed in this case, the identification of the offense for which appellant was convicted is as reflected in a partial copy of the judgment that was attached to appellant’s notice of appeal.] 

On February 17, 2011, by order of the Texas Supreme Court, this appeal was transferred from the Fifth District Court of Appeals to this Court.  See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2005).  By separate letters, both dated March 1, 2011, this Court notified the district clerk and official court reporter that the appellate record in this case had been due to be filed no later than December 17, 2010, and directed the clerk and reporter to advise this Court of the status of the records on or before March 11, 2011.  We received a request for extension of time to file the reporter’s record on March 1, 2011.  This request was granted.  However, to date, we have neither received the clerk’s record nor any response to this Court’s March 1, 2011 directive.  

Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c).  Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the status of the preparation of the clerk’s record, and to enter any order necessary under the present circumstances to ensure that the clerk’s record is filed as soon as practicable.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed.  In addition, the trial court shall (1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, (2) cause a supplemental clerks record to be developed containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and any orders it may issue relating to this matter, and (3) cause a reporters record to be developed transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing.  The trial court shall then file the supplemental clerks record and any reporters record transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this Court on or before April 22, 2011.  Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, same must be requested before April 22, 2011.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.  

2
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           John H. Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood      

# John H. Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood

The John H. Chafee Foster Care Program for Successful Transition to Adulthood (the Chafee program) provides funding to support youth/ young adults in or formerly in foster care in their transition to adulthood. The program is funded through formula grants awarded to child welfare agencies in States (including the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands) and participating Tribes. Chafee funds are used to assist youth/ young adults in a wide variety of areas designed to support a successful transition to adulthood. Activities and programs include, but are not limited to, help with education, employment, financial management, housing, emotional support and assured connections to caring adults. Specific services and supports are determined by the child welfare agency, vary by State, locality and agency, and are often based on the individual needs of the young person. Many State or local agencies contract with private organizations to deliver services to young people.

https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/grant-funding/john-h-chafee-foster-care-independence-program
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk January 25, 2013

d0122 

# Order

January 25, 2013

145002(112)

U.S. MOTORS, PRAHA MOTORS, L.L.C.,

BRATISLAVA MOTORS, L.L.C., U.S.

MOTORS (SK), and JOSEPH LEVIN,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 145002

COA: 299901

Wayne CC: 10

- 001791

- CZ

GENERAL MOTORS EUROPE,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 4,

2012 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
#### Wallace System, Inc., appellee, v. David Riordan, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,392.

Opinion filed January 2, 1930.

Rehearing denied January 15, 1930.

Clark & Clark, for appellant; Russell S. Clark, of counsel. Charles Daniels, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Ryner

delivered the opinion of the court.