alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Robert Schlicht et al., Doing Business as Hudson Bay, Petitioners, v. William S. Hults, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.

Proceeding under CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of the respondent Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, which suspended for 10 days petitioner’s automobile dealer’s license. By order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated July 6, 1965, the proceeding was transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, with costs. Although we find the evidence insufficient to support the determination of a violation of section 415 (subd. 9, par. c) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law with respect to replacement of the idler arm, the evidence is more than sufficient to sustain the determination as to the other charges. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# SUMMARY:

                        The Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 105-121, November 26, 1997, to advise the Board of Directors on the development and implementation of policies and programs designed to support the expansion of the Bank's                               ( print page 70260)                            financial commitments in Sub-Saharan Africa under the loan, guarantee, and insurance programs of the Bank. Further, the committee shall make recommendations on how the Bank can facilitate greater support by U.S. commercial banks for trade with Sub-Saharan Africa.                    

*Time and Place:*                         December 2, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Export-Import Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.                    

*Agenda:*                         Presentation on recent developments in Sub-Saharan Africa markets by Export Import Bank staff; an update on the Bank's on-going business development initiatives in the region; and Committee discussion of current challenges and opportunities for U.S. exporters.                    

*Public Participation:*                         The meeting will be open to public participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) before or after the meeting. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, prior to December 2, 2010, Richard Thelen, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3515 or TDD (202) 565-3377.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, contact Richard Thelen, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3515.

Jonathon Cordone,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-28728 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
§ 15b.35 Nonacademic services. ( a ) *Physical education and athletics.* ( 1 ) In providing physical education courses and athletics and similar aid, benefits, or services to any of its students, a recipient to which this subpart applies may not discriminate on the basis of handicap. A recipient that offers physical education courses or that operates or sponsors intercollegiate, club, or intramural athletics shall provide to qualified handicapped students an equal opportunity for participation in these activities.
( 2 ) A recipient may offer to handicapped students physical education and athletic activities that are separate or different only if separation or differentiation is consistent with the requirements of § 15b.31(d) and only of no qualified handicapped student is denied the opportunity to compete for teams or to participate in courses that are not separate or different.
( b ) *Counseling and placement services.* A recipient to which this subpart applies that provides personal, academic, or vocational counseling, guidance, or placement services to its students shall provide these services without discrimination on the basis of handicap. The recipient shall ensure that qualified handicapped students are not counseled toward more restrictive career objectives than are nonhandcapped students with similar interests and abilities. This requirement does not preclude a recipient from providing factual information about licensing and certification requirements that may present obstacles to handicapped persons in their pursuit of particular careers.
( c ) *Social organizations.* A recipient that provides significant assistance to fraternities, sororities, or similar organizations shall assure itself that the membership practices of such organizations do not permit discrimination otherwise prohibited by this subpart.
[47 FR 25470, June 11, 1982, as amended at 68 FR 51343, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### § 1775.13 Grant agreement.

Applicants selected for funding will complete a grant agreement, RUS Guide 1775-1, which outlines the terms and conditions of the grant award.
#### §§ 1755.4-1755.25 [Reserved]
Exhibit 4.16

 

Summary of Syndicate Loan Agreement dated March 23, 2012, between Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Beijing) Corporation, Semiconductor Manufacturing

International Corporation, as guarantor, and China Development Bank, The Export-Import Bank Of China, China Construction Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Beijing

 

On March 23, 2012, Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Beijing) Corporation (“SMIC Beijing”) entered into a seven-year loan agreement with an aggregate principal amount of US$600 million with a syndicate of banks based in the People’s Republic of China, including China Development Bank and the Export-Import Bank of China , China Construction Bank, Bank of Shanghai, Bank of Beijing.

 

The draw-down period under the loan is one year and nine months. The loan is repayable in six semi-annual installments beginning in March 2014. The Registrant has guaranteed SMIC Beijing’s obligations under the loan, which is also secured by the manufacturing equipment located in the SMIC Beijing and Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Tianjin) Corporation (“SMIC Tianjin”) fabs, and 100% equity pledge of SMIC Beijing and SMIC Tianjin.

 

Any of the following in respect of SMIB would constitute an event of default during the term of the loan agreement:

 

1.   Total Liabilities/Total Assets is more than 65% (Total Liabilities exclude Shareholder’s loans); or

 

2.   (Net Profit + Depreciation + Amortization + Interest Expenses + Cash flow from Financing)/(Principal + Interest Expenses) is less than 100%.
#### DEMING, Respondent, v. THOMSEN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 5, 1906.)

Action by Macy F. Deming, as executor, etc., against Thomas H. Thomsen.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
**EXHIBIT 10.7**
**TABLE OF 2005 BASE SALARIES FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY**
**EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2005**     **Name and Position** **2005 Base Salary** I. Jon Brumley, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer $500,000      Jon S. Brumley, President $375,000      Roy W. Jageman, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Corporate Secretary $250,000      Tom H. Olle, Senior Vice President — Asset Management $235,000      Robert S. Jacobs, Senior Vice President — Business Development and Planning $215,000      Donald P. Gann, Jr., Senior Vice President — Operations $215,000
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Peter L. Van Camp

*Stephen B. Beitman,*in support of the petition.

Submitted July 22

decided August 13, 1971

The petition by the defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
## Other Youth Topics

## Breadcrumb

            -  Youth Topics 
            -  Opportunity Youth 
            -  Performance Partnership Pilots for Disconnected Youth (P3) 
            -           Round 3 Bidders Conference      

# Round 3 Bidders Conference

### **REGISTRATION IS NOW CLOSED.**

On August 25, 2016, representatives from Federal agencies presented details of the **Notice Inviting Applications (NIA)** for the third round (FY 2016) of the Performance Partnership Pilots for Disconnected Youth (P3), including application requirements and selection criteria for potential applicants. **Access the webinar recording archive link.** The webinar recording will remain available at the given **link** for future viewing.

## Re-Connect Menu

-  Overview 
-  Evaluation 
-  Round 5 (FY 2021) 
-  Round 4 (FY 2018 and FY 2019) 
-  Round 3 (FY 2016)    -  Round 3 Pilot Site Orientation 
  -  Round 3 NIA FAQs 
  -  Round 3 Bidders Conference 
  -  Round 3 Bidders Conference Recording 
  -  Round 3 Program List 
  -  Round 3 Blog Post (2016) 
-  Round 2 (FY 2015) 
-  Round 1 (FY 2014) 
-  Background
Exhibit 10.16


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EQUITY RESIDENTIAL 2002 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (“First Amendment”) TO EQUITY RESIDENTIAL 2002
SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN  (“Plan”)
is made as of the 7th day of February 2003.


 


Recitals:


 


1.       The Board of Trustees of
Equity Residential (the “Company”) has determined to adopt an amendment to the
Plan, which does not require shareholder approval as permitted under Section 16
(c).


 


2.       Terms used in this First
Amendment which are defined in the Plan have the meanings given them in the
Plan.


 


1.       AMENDMENTS.  Section 3 (b) of the Plan is hereby deleted
and the following Section 3 (b) is substituted therefore:


 


(b)        Board of Trustees. Each member of the Board of Trustees will
receive an annual award of Share Awards and Options equal to $50,000 in value
on the same day as the annual grant of Share Awards and Options to the Company’s
executive officers.  The annual $50,000
award will be allocated between Options (valued by using the same valuation
criteria utilized by the Committee in its employee option grants made as of the
same date) and Share Awards (valued at the closing price of the Company’s
common shares on the date of grant), in the same ratio as approved by the
Committee for the annual long term incentive awards to the Company’s executive
officers.  The Share Award will vest in
full on the third anniversary of the Grant Date.  The Options will vest in equal installments
six months, twelve months and twenty-four months from the Grant Date.


 


2.       PLAN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.  After giving effect to this First Amendment,
the Plan remains in full force and effect.
Exhibit 31.2**Rule 15d-14(a) Certification**  I, Jack C. Bendheim, Chairman of the Board of PAHC Holdings Corporation, certify that: (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PAHC Holdings Corporation; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2005/s/ Jack C. BendheimJack C. Bendheim,Chairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer)
§ 1730.27 Vulnerability and Risk Assessment (VRA). ( a ) Each borrower with an approved RUS electric program loan shall perform an initial VRA of its electric system. Additional or periodic VRA's may be necessary if significant changes occur in the borrower's system, and records of such additional assessments shall be maintained by the borrower.
( b ) Each applicant that submits an application for an RUS electric program loan or grant shall include with its application package a letter certification that such applicant has performed an initial VRA of its electric system. Additional or periodic VRA's may be necessary if significant changes occur in the borrower's system, and records of such additional assessments shall be maintained by the borrower.
( c ) The VRA shall include identifying: ( 1 ) Critical assets or facilities considered necessary for the reliability and security of the electric power grid as described in § 1730.21(c);
( 2 ) Facilities that if damaged or destroyed would cause significant risk to the safety and health of the public;
( 3 ) Critical assets or infrastructure owned or served by the borrower's electric system that are determined, identified and communicated as elements of national security by the consumer, State or Federal government;
( 4 ) External system impacts (interdependency) with loss of identified system components;
( 5 ) Threats to facilities and assets identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this section;
( 6 ) Criticality and risk level of the borrower's system;
( 7 ) Critical asset components and elements unique to the RUS borrower's system; and
( 8 ) Other threats, if any, identified by an individual borrower.
[69 FR 60541, Oct. 12, 2004, as amended at 87 FR 73443, Nov. 30, 2022]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child Model      

# Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child Model

The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and CDC, in collaboration with key leaders from the education, public health, and school health fields, have developed and released the new Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) model, which is recommended as a strategy for improving students’ health and learning in schools. The WSCC model, which builds on elements of the traditional coordinated school health approach and the whole child framework, will be integrated into CDC’s school health initiatives.

http://www.ascd.org/programs/learning-and-health/wscc-model.aspx
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Thad Trent, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation for the year ended December 29, 2019; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: April 15, 2020 | By: | /s/ Thad Trent                                                                            
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |     | Thad TrentExecutive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
#### Williams *et al. vs.*Hall.

Motion,

A replevin bond —to have the force of a judgment, must to acknowledged before an officer— otherwise it is but a common law bond, on which no execution can legally issue.

A constable is not liable for any failure to act upon an execution issuedupon a mere common law bond, not having the force of a judgment. Where a replev inbonddoesnot purport to have been acknowledged before an officer,evidence is admissible to show that a private person took the acknowledgment. —An obligor is a competent wit ness to prove that fact, in a trial between the obligee, and an officer charged with a failure to return an ex’on founded on tlie bond,

The measure of responsibility of an officer for failing to return, in due time, commonwealth’s notes, is the value of the notes at the return day, with interest and damages, And there must be proof of the value of the notes, or the judgment will be erroneous. an execution

[Messrs. Sanders and Depew for Plaintiffs : Mr. Monroe and Mr. McCann for Defendant.]

From the Circuit Court for Grant County.

*April*18.

Chief Justice 'Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This writ of error is prosecuted *to*reverse a judgment, on motion, against a constable and his sureties, for his failure to return, within twenty clays after the return day, *» fieri facias*which had been delivered to him.

There are many irregularities in the proceedings; but we shall notice only two objections to the judgment.

*First.*The execution having been issued on a bond described as a *replevin bond,*but which did not purport to have been acknowledged before any constable, the plaintiffs in error offered to prove, by one of the obligors in the bond, that it was not taken by ,an officer, but was, in fact, acknowledged before a private individual. The circuit court refused to admit the offered testimony.

If there was no judgment authorizing the execution, the constable was not bound to levy, or to return it, and could not be held liable for any penalty for failing to do either, or both. If the bond was not taken as a statutory obligation, it could not be deemed a judgment, but could have the effect only of a common law obligation. Waiving the question whether, as it does not appear on its face to have been officially taken, it should therefore be deemed not to have the effect of a judgment, we are clearly of the opinion, that the testimony which was offered was competent. It would not contradict the bond, and the witness had no interest in the event of this suit; no testimony which he could give in this case, could impair his liability as an obligor in the bond.

*98
      *Second.*The execution was for notes of the bank of the commonwealth. The judgment against the plaintiffs in error, is for specie; and there was no proof of the value of notes of the bank of the commonwealth.— In this respect, also, the judgment, is erroneous. The value of the paper when the execution should have been returned, together with interest and damages, is the legal measure of responsibility, if any liability at all be established.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.