alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1773.1 General. ( a ) This part implements the standards for audits required by the loan contracts and grant agreements of Rural Utilities Service (RUS) electric and telecommunications awardees. The provisions in this part require auditees to prepare and furnish to RUS, at least once during each 12-month period, a full and complete report of its financial condition, operations, and cash flows, in form and substance satisfactory to RUS, audited by an independent auditor that meets the requirements of § 1773.5, and performed in accordance with auditing standards issued by generally accepted Government auditing standards (GAGAS) and the requirements of § 1773.7.
( b ) This part is based on the requirements of GAGAS in effect at the time of the audit and applicable RUS regulations and subpart F (Audit Requirements) of 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards) (2 CFR 200.500-200.521).
( c ) This part further sets forth the criteria that an auditee should use to select an auditor and certain audit procedures and audit documentation that must be performed and prepared by the auditor.
( d ) Failure of an auditee to provide an audit in compliance with this part is a serious violation of the RUS security agreement. RUS relies on audited financial statements in order to assess and monitor the financial condition of its awardees and to fulfill its fiduciary responsibilities.
( e ) RUS reserves the right to suspend its acceptance of audits performed by auditors who, in the opinion of RUS, are not meeting the requirements of this part or with unresolved disputes or issues until such time that the matter can be resolved to RUS' satisfaction.
[83 FR 19907, May 7, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 7562, Feb. 6, 2023]
PD-0319-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 8/19/2015 3:29:23 PM

Accepted 8/20/2015 1:50:47 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Personal Competencies for College & Career Success      

# Resource: Personal Competencies for College & Career Success

This guide describes strategies postsecondary professionals can use to assist all students, including those with disabilities, to develop personal competencies that will increase their chances of success. 

http://www.ncwd-youth.info/PersonalCompetencies?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links
{"@context": "https://wayback.archive-it.org/16698/20210520143729/http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "item": {"@id": "https:\/\/wayback.archive-it.org\/16698\/20210520143729\/http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/nuclearvault", "name": "Nuclear Vault"}}]}

















© 2021 Google LLC
EX-10.6(b)



 Exhibit 10.6(b) 
 June 1, 2012 
 PGR Capital LLP 
 Gilmora House 
 57-61 Mortimer Street 
 London W1W 8HS, 
 UK 
 Attention: Casey Grylls 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Grylls: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below
(the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 



	 	•	 	 CTA Capital LLC 



	 	•	 	 PGR Master Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Spectrum Strategic 


 Please
acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290.

 Very truly yours, 
  

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian Centner
		 	Brian Centner
		 	Chief Financial Officer and Director
	
	PGR CAPITAL LLP
		
	By:        	 	/s/ Casey Grylls
		
	 Print Name:
	 	Casey Grylls
	 BC/sr
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 2920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-880]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6875]

Designations of Foreign Terrorist Organizations; In the Matter of 
the Designation of: al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), Also 
Known as al-Qa'ida of Jihad Organization in the Arabian Peninsula, Also 
Known as Tanzim Qa'idat al-Jihad fi Jazirat al-Arab, Also Known as al-
Qa'ida Organization in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), Also Known as al-
Qa'ida in Yemen (AQY), Also Known as al-Qa'ida in the South Arabian 
Peninsula, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Section 219 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended.

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary 
of the Treasury, I conclude that there is a sufficient factual basis to 
find that the relevant circumstances described in section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (hereinafter ``INA'') (8 
U.S.C. 1189), exist with respect to al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula 
(AQAP), also known as al-Qa'ida of Jihad Organization in the Arabian 
Peninsula, also known as Tanzim Qa'idat al-Jihad fi Jazirat al-Arab, 
also known as al-Qa'ida Organization in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), 
also known as al-Qa'ida in Yemen (AQY), also known as al-Qa'ida in the 
South Arabian Peninsula.
    Therefore, I hereby designate the aforementioned organization and 
its aliases as a foreign terrorist organization pursuant to section 219 
of the INA.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    December 14, 2009.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-880 Filed 1-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
#### § 160.86 Prohibited use of United States Standards.

It shall be deemed unlawful under any condition to sell, under or by reference to any United States Standard for naval stores, as provided by the act and defined in the regulations in this part, any article which fails to conform with such standard in all respects: *Provided,* That the phrase “under or by reference to United States Standards” as it appears in the act and the regulations in this part, shall include the use of any words, letters, brands, labels, or marks constituting any of the United States Standards for naval stores on any container of naval stores, on anything attached to or supplied therewith on delivery, or on any inspection, sale, or shipping record or invoice, in describing the kind, classification, or grade of the naval stores covered thereby.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00798-CR

Jacquelyn Marie Aguillon, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 70042, THE HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Jacquelyn Marie Aguillon has filed a document with this Court that we

construe as a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 42.2(a).

__________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: August 7, 2014

Do Not Publish
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1437.307 Mushrooms. ( a ) Eligible mushrooms is a value loss crop and is only compensable in accord with the restrictions of this section. To be eligible, the mushrooms must be grown as a commercial crop in a facility with a controlled environment utilizing good mushroom growing practices. The facility must be located on private property either owned or leased by the producer.
( b ) The controlled environment for eligible mushrooms must include primary and backup systems for: ( 1 ) Temperature and humidity controls;
( 2 ) Proper and adequate lighting; and
( 3 ) Positive air pressurization and filtration.
( c ) The growing medium must consist of a substrate (a habitat and nutrient base) sterilized by heat treatment.
( d ) Good mushroom growing practices must be used, and they consist of proper and adequate insect and disease control and the maintenance of a sterile environment. Maintaining a sterile environment includes at a minimum: ( 1 ) Adequate hygiene;
( 2 ) Overall cleanliness;
( 3 ) Isolation or minimum contact procedures;
( 4 ) Use of footpaths; and
( 5 ) Availability and frequent utilization of wash-down facilities.
( e ) In the crop year in which a notice of loss is filed, producers may be required, at the discretion of FSA, to provide evidence the mushrooms are maintained in accordance with this section.
[67 FR 12448, Mar. 19, 2002, as amended at 79 FR 74583, Dec. 15, 2014]
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1430.210 MILC agents. ( a ) MILC benefits may be disbursed by a dairy marketing cooperative that serves special groups or communities, such as an Amish or Mennonite community. Producers in such groups in a dairy operation may authorize an agent of a dairy cooperative or milk handler affiliated with such cooperative to obtain and disburse MILC benefits to the dairy operation.
( b ) The authorized MILC agent must on behalf of the dairy operation do the following: ( 1 ) Obtain an acceptable power of attorney or acceptable equivalent for the producers of the dairy operation that authorizes the agent to enter into an MILC contract;
( 2 ) Enter into a written agreement with CCC for approval to act as a MILC agent on a form prescribed by CCC;
( 3 ) Provide the dairy operation's monthly production evidence to the appropriate FSA office;
( 4 ) Disburse payment to the dairy operation in the producer's monthly milk check or in an otherwise approved manner.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel Stephens, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered November 22, 1963, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny and assault (both in the second degree), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Action remitted to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Part of the People’s proof consisted of a statement made by defendant after his arrest and prior to arraignment. The issue of the voluntariness of that statement was submitted by the trial court to the jury for determination ‘together with the other issues. This procedure has been held to be in violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights; defendant was entitled to a separate trial by the court alone of the issue of the voluntariness of his confession *(Jackson*v. *Denno,*378 U. S. 368; *People*v. *Huntley,*15 N Y 2d 72). Accordingly, this action is remitted to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with *People*v. *Huntley (supra).*The procedure prescribed in *People*v. *Korda*(24 A D 2d 577) should *be*followed. In the interim, the pending appeal in this court will be held in abeyance. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
C HIEF J USTICE

C AROLYN W RIGHT

J USTICES

D AVID L. B RIDGES

M OLLY F RANCIS

D OUGLAS S. L ANG

E LIZABETH L ANG

- M IERS

R OBERT M. F ILLMORE

L

ANA M YERS

D AVID E VANS

D AVID L EWIS

A DA B ROW N

C RAIG S TODDART

B ILL W HITEHILL

D AVID J. S CHENCK 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 C OMMERCE S TREET

, S UITE 200

D ALLAS

, T EXAS 75202

(214) 712

- 3400 L ISA M ATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712

- 3450

lisa.matz@ 5th.txcourts.gov

G AYLE H UMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRAT OR

(214) 712

- 3434

gayle.humpa@ 5th.txcourts.gov

F ACSIMILE

(214) 745

- 1083

I NTERNET

HTTP :// 5 TH

. TXCOURTS

. GOV



## August 5, 2015

Nanette Hendrickson

Dallas County Public Defender’s Office

Frank Crowley Courts Building

133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB

- 2

Dallas, TX 75207

RE: 05

- 14

- 01479/01480

- CR

Marcus McClarity v. The State of Texas

Counsel:

Appellant filed a pro se motion to dismiss his appeal in cause no. 05

- 14

- 01479

- CR. It

does not appear to reference the appeal in cause no. 05

- 14

- 01480

- CR. A copy of the motion is

attached. Because the m otion is not signed by counsel, the Court cannot take any action on it at

this time. If you concur in appellant’s decision, please sign the enclosed copy and return it to

the Court within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this letter. Additionally, please conf irm that

appellant desires to continue his appeal in cause no. 05

- 14

- 01480

- CR. We appreciate your

attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

/s/ Lisa Matz, Clerk of the Court

Enclosure

ltr:mrh
#### Frances Reyes, Individually and as Guardian ad Litem of Maria Reyes, an Infant, Appellant, v. Burton Sternberg, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

Judgment for defendant entered upon dismissal of complaint by trial court at close of the ease, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to abide the event, and a new trial directed. The proof of defendant’s ownership of the motor vehicle which struck the plaintiffs created a presumption that the driver, a garage mechanic, was using the vehicle with the defendant’s permission, express or implied. (See Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 59, now § 388.) This presumption was rebuttable but, even in the case of substantial evidence "to the contrary, the question of consent and authority ordinarily presents an issue of fact. Upon the record here, the presumption was not rebutted as a matter of law by the testimony of the defendant (owner) that he had given the ear to the mechanic for repair work to correct a difficulty in starting the engine and that he had not given the mechanic permission to drive the car. The issues, including questions of credibility, should have been submitted to the jury. ( See *May*v. *Heiney,*12 N Y 2d 683; *Leotta*v. *Plessinger,*
      *8298 N Y 2d 449; *Cosimo*v. *Hollenbeck,*19 A D 2d 921; *Brindley*v. *Krizsan,*18 A D 2d 971.) Concur—Eager, J. P., Steuer, Capozzoli, Tilzer and Staley, Jr., JJ.
#### In re PAUL JONES & CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 27, 1906.)

In the matter of the application of Paul Jones & Co. to compel the payment by their attorney, Frederick L. Gilbert, of money received by him as such.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed by default, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Partnership's audited financial
statements for the year ended September 30, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         1,362
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    920
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      124
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,024
<PP&E>                                        30,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                (9,733)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                23,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,426
<BONDS>                                       42,388
<COMMON>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (20,191)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  23,623
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,649
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 577
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               6,369
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,389
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (9,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (9,534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (9,534)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.27)
        


</TABLE>
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________
N O . 09

- 2 2

- 00 229

- CR

__________________

IN RE RODERIC DEMOND JAMES

__________________________________________________________________ Original Proceeding Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 21

- 38216

__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Roderic Demond James seeks to compel the trial court to rule on

motions , which he filed in the trial court pro se. 1 When the trial court

failed to do so, James filed a petition for mandamus in this Court, also

1 James’ petition is procedurally defective. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3. Additionally, he failed to certify that he served a copy of the petition on the Respondent and on the State , which is the real party in interest. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5. We will look beyond these deficiencies under Rule 2, however, in order to expedite the result. See Tex. R. App. P. 2.2 pro se. In his petition, James states that an attorney is representing him

in the court below

.

To be entitled to relief on a writ of mandamus, the relator must

d emonstrate (1) there is no adequate remedy at law, and (2) there is a

clear and indisputable right to the relief sought. 2 “[W]hen a motion is

properly filed and pending before a trial court, the act of considering and

resolving it is ministerial.” Ex part e Bates , 65 S.W.3d 133, 134

- 35 (Tex.

App.

— Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding). Yet a trial court has no duty to

consider and rule upon a defendant’s pro se motions when the defendant

is represented by counsel since defendant s in criminal cases are not

entitle d to hybrid representation

. 3

For these reasons, James’ petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 23, 2022 Opinion Delivered August 24, 2022 Do Not Publish

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.

2 See State v. Patrick , 86 S.W.3d 592, 594 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002).

3 See Robinson v. State , 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) ( “[A] trial court is free to disregard any pro se motions presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel.” )

.
n m

o

r

e

?

ty home

ew the

rulemakings,

of the regu

ns, and

d

o

t.g

o

v

sportation

s Materials

tion

, PHH-50

0590

t.gov

42

F

u

m

i

g

a

n

t

M

a

r

k

i

n

g

R

e

q

u

i

r

e

m

e

n

t

s

Marking Requirements for a transport vehicle orfreight container in which the lading has been fumigated

U.S. Department

of Transportation

Pipeline and

Hazardous Materials

Safety Administration

PHH-50

400 Seventh St., S.W.

Washington, DC 20590

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION

Compliance Basics Series

U.S. Department of TransportationPipeline and Hazardous MaterialsSafety Administration

.gov
You may not affix or display the

FUMIGANT marking on a transportvehicle, freight container or railcarunless it contains lading which hasbeen fumigated or is undergoingfumigation.The FUMIGANT marking must:Q have red letters on a white background at least 30 cm (11.8 inches) wide and at least 25 cm (9.8

inches) high; The “*” is replacedwith the technical name of thefumigant (see sample marking,reverse side.)

Q be prominently displayed so that

it can be seen by any personattempting to enter the interior ofthe vehicle or container; and

Q remain on the transport vehicle,

container or railcar until the fumigated lading is unloaded, andthe vehicle or container hasundergone sufficient aeration sothat it does not pose an unreasonable risk to healthand safety.

For domestic transportation, a hazard warning label authorized by EPAunder 40 CFR Part 156 may be used

as an alternative to the FUMIGANTmarking.For international shipments, transportdocuments must indicate the dateof fumigation, type and amount offumigant used, and instructions fordisposal of any residual fumigant,including fumigation devices.Any person subject to the regulations solely due to the fumigatedlading, must be informed of therequirements and the safety precautions necessary to protect themselves and others in the event of anincident or accident involving thefumigated lading.If you offer for transportation or transport a freight container, railcar, ortransport vehicle that is subject to theHMR solely because it contains ladingwhich has been fumigated or isundergoing fumigation (i.e., no otherhazardous materials are being transported), you are not subject to any other requirements of the HMR. 

This brochure’sreverse side providesa sample FUMIGANTSmarking.

erials 

freight 

ransport

g has 

ergoing

a package

aterial 

02 and

 specify a

to identify

f trans

a transport

trailer),

car, in

een fumi

 fumiga

ational

 container,

ng has

rgoing

ial, is con

ining a

s it has

o that it

nable risk