p. 1



# OAR Box 1170
Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 88 ) F

. R

. Marc h 1 , 199 0
Docket Number: 

# A-88-2 4

Printed 4/30/200810:49:06

AM Sheet 88of 182P. 2 

# V 057 0 

# &-Z2-2 +

Federa l Registe r

/ Vol

. 54 , No

. 3 9 /

Wednesday , Marc h1 , 19B 9 / Propose dRule s appl y to source s that : (1 ) Remove C0 2 or 0 2 throughprocesse s othe r

than combustion , (2

) ad dO j (e.g. , oxyge n enrichment) an dN 2 in proportion s different

fro mthat o f air , (3 ) ad d C0 2 (e.g. , cement

or lim e kilns) , or

(4 ) hav e on fue l factor , F 0 , value s obtainabl e (e.g. , extremel y variabl e wast e mixtures)

. Thi s metho dvalidate s th e measure dproportion s o f C0 2 an d0 2 fo

r fue l type , bu t the metho d doe s no t detec t sampl e dilutio n resultin g fro m leak s durin g o r

after sampl e collection

. Th e metho di s applicabl e fo

r sample s collecte d downstrea mo

f mos t lim e or limeston e flue

ga s desulfurizatio n unit s a s th e C0 2 adde dor remove dfro

mth e ga s streami s no t significant i n relatio n to the total C0 2 concentration

. Th e C0 2 concentration s fro m • othe r type s o f scrubber s usin g only wate r o r basi c slurr

y can b e significantl y affecte dan d woul drende r

th e F 0 check

minimally useful

. 3.4.1. 1 Calculat e afue

l factor

. F „ usin g th e following equation :

F. = 20. 9 —

%Q*, %CO a Eq

. 3B- 1

where : %0 2 = Percen t

0 2 b y volume , dr y basis

. %C0 2 =Percen t

C0 2 b y volume , dr y basis

. 20. 9 = Percen t

0 2 b y volum e i n ambien t air

. I f C O i s presen t

i n quantitie s measurabl e b y thi s method , adjus t

th e 0 2 an dCO * value s befor e performin g th e calculatio n fo r F„ a s follows : %C0 2 = (adj ) = %C0 2 + %C O %O , = (adj)=%O.-0. 5 %C O where : SC O = Percen t

C O b y volume , dr y basis

. 3.4.1. 2 Compar e th e calculate dF „ facto r wit hth e expecte dF „ values

. Th e followin g tabl e ma y b e use di n establishin g acceptabl e range s fo r

th e expecte dF 0 i

f th e fue l bein g burne di s known

. Whe n fuels ar e burne di n combinations , calculat e th e combine dfue l F d an dF c factor s (a s define di n Metho d19 ) accordin g t o th e procedur e i n Metho d19 , Sectio n 5.2.3

. The n calcuat e th e F 0 facto r a s follows :
F„ = 0.209F, , Eq

. 3B- 2

Fue l typ e Coal :
Oil : Distillat e Gas :

Woo d : F„rang e

1.016-1.13 0 1.083-1.23 0 1.260-1.41 3 1.210-1.37 0 1,600-1.83 6 1.434-158 6 1.405-1.55 3 1 000-1.12 0 1.003-1.13 0 3.4. 1 Calculate dF „ values , beyon dth e acceptabl e range s show n i n thi s tabie

. shoul d b e investigate dbefor e acceptin g th e tes t results

. Fo r

example , th e strengt ho f th e solution s i n th e ga s analyze r an dth e analyzin g techniqu e shoul db e checke db y samplin g an danalyzin g aknow n concentration , suc ha s air ; th e fue l facto r shoul db e reviewe dan dverified

. A n acceptabilit y rang e o f ±1 2 percen t

i s appropriat e fo r

th e F 0 facto r

o f mixe dfuels wit hvariabl e fue l ratios

. Th e leve l o f th e emissio n rat e relativ e t o th e complianc e leve l shoul db e considere di n determinin g if a retes t i s appropriate , i.e. ; i

f th e measure d emission s ar e muc hlowe r o r muc hgreate r tha n th e complianc e limit , repetitio n o f th e tes t woul dno t

significantl y chang e th e complianc e statu s o f

th e sourc e an dwoul db e unnecessaril y tim e consumin g an dcostly

. 4

. Calculation s 4. 1 Nomenclature

. Sam e a s Sectio n 5 o f Metho d3 wit hth e additio n o f th e following : %E A = Percen t

exces s air

. 0.264=Rati o o f

O * t o N 2 i n air , v/v

. 4. 2 Percen t

Exces s Air

. Calculat e th e presen t exces s ai r

(i f applicable ) b y substitutin g th e appropriat e value s o f percen t Oa , CO , an dN

» (obtaine dfro mSectio n 3.1. 3 o r 3.2.4 ) int o Equatio n 3B-3

.

%E A = SSOa-0. 5 C O

0.26 4 %N 2 -{%0 2 -0. 5 %CO ) X10 0 Eq

. 3&- 3

Note.—Th e equatio n abov e assume s tha t ambien t ai r i s use da s th e sourc e o f 0 2 an d tha t th e fue l doe s no t

contai n appreciabl e amount s o f

N 2 (a s d o cok e ove n o r blas t furanc e gases)

. Fo r

thos e case s whe n appreciabl e amount s o f N 2 ar e presen t

(coal , oil , an dnatura l ga s d o no t contai n appreciabl e amount s o f N 2 ) o r whe n oxyge n enrichmen t

i s used , alternativ e methods , subjec t t o approva l o f

th e Administrator , ar e required

. 4

. Bibliography Sam e a s Metho d3

. (F RDoc

. 89-572 2 File d2-28-89 ; 8:4 5 am ) BILLING COOE 6560-50- M

4 0 CF R Par t 6 0 [AD-FRL-3530-5 ] Standard s o f Performanc e fo r Ne w Stationar y Source s AGENCY : Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y (EPA)

. ACTION : Propose drul e an dnotic e of publi c hearing

. SUMMARY : Th e purpos e of thi s propose d rul e i s five-fold : (1 ) Requir e (a s oppose d t o bein g a n option ) th e monitorin g o f sulfu r dioxid e (SO2 ) i n gase s discharge d int o th e atmospher e fro mth e combustio n o f

fue l gase s or , a s a n alternative , th e monitorin g o f hydroge n sulfid e H 2 S ) i n fue l gases ; (2 ) delet e th e mentio n of

controllin g SO 2 afte r combustio n o

f fue l gases ; (3 ) delet e th e monitorin g requiremen t of H2 S i n gase s discharge dint o th e atmospher e fro m Clau s sulfu r

recover y plants , bu t

requir e th e monitorin g o f

tota l reduce dsulfu r (TRS ) compound s usin g TR S continuou s emissio n monitorin g system s (CEM's ) o r S0 2 CEMS' s afte r

oxidizin g th e TR S compound s t o SO2 ; (4 ) ad dPerformanc e Specificatio n (PS ) 7 fo r H 2 S CEMS' s t o Appendi x B of

thi s part ; an d(5 ) clarif y ambiguitie s i n th e existin g regulations

. Al l affecte dfue l ga s combustio n device s an dClau s plant s i n petroleu mrefinerie s subjec t t o Subpar t

J of 4 0 CFRPar t

6 0 wil l b e require dt o instal l an doperat e CEMS' s withi n 1 yea r

of th e promulgatio n date

. Thes e monitorin g requirement s ar e no t

new , bu t

previou s H 2 S an dTR S CEM S installation s wer e

contingen t

upo n th e Agency' s promulgatio n o f

PS's

. A publi c hearin g wil l b e held , if requested , t o provid e intereste dperson s a n opportunit y fo r

ora l presentatio n of dsta , views , o r

argument s concernin g th e propose drule

. DATES : Comments. Comment s mus t b e receive do n o r

befor e Ma y 15,1989

. Public Hearing. I

f anyon e contact s EP A requestin g t o spea k a t apubli c hearin g b y Marc h22,1989 , apubli c hearin g wil l b e hel do n Apri l 17,1989

. beginnin g a t

10:0 0 a.m . Person s intereste di n attendin g th e hearin g shoul dcal l Fosto n Curti s a t (919 ) 541

- 106 3 t o verif

y tha t ahearin g wil l b e held

. Request to Speak

at Hearing. Person s wishin g t o presen t

ora l testimon y mus t contac t EP A b y Marc h22,1989

. ADDRESSES : Comments. Comment s shoul db e submitte dfi n duplicat e i f possible ) to : Centra l Docke t Sectio n (LE-131) , Attention : Docke t Numbe r A

88-24 , U.S

. Enviionmenta l Protectio n Agency , Sout hConferenc e Center , Roo mP. 3



### "Federal •-•Refflster;/- 3 Vd

^ .:.r'.X-r?°S- ' 

### 4,401 M Street , SW. , Washington , DC 20460

. Public Hearing. I

f anyon e contact s EP A requestin g apubli c hearing , it wil l b e hel da t EPA' s Emissio n Measuremen t Laboratory , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolina

. Person s intereste di n attendin g th e hearin g o r

wishin g t o presen t ora l testimon y shoul dnotif y Fosto n Curtis , Emissio n Measuremen t Branc h(MD-19) , Technica l Suppor t Division , U.S

. Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a27711 , telephon e numbe r (919 ) 541-1083.

. ~ M Docket Docke t No

. A-88r-24

. containin g material s relevan t t o thi s rulemaking , i s availabl e fo r publi c

, inspectio n an dcopyin g betwee n 8:0 0 a.m . an d3:3 0 p.m. , Monday throug h Friday , a t EPA' s Centra l Docke t

Section

. Sout hConferenc e Center , Room4,401 M Street , SW.

. Washington , D C 20460

. A reasonabl e fe e may b e charge dfo r copying

. FO RFURTHE RINFORMATIO N CONTACT : 

### Fosto n Curti s o r

Roge r T

. Shigehara , Emissio n Measuremen t

Branc h(MD-19) , Technica l Support

Division , U.S

. Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a 27711 , telephon e numbe r

(919 ) 541-1063

. SUPPLEMENTAR

YINFORMATION : 

### LTh e Rulemakin g Th e presen t

monitorin g requirement s for

. fue l ga s combustio n device s unde r § 60.105(a ) (3 ) an d(4) allo w th e option s of monitorin g SCf

e after fue l gase s ar e combuste do r

monitorin g H 2 

### S in th e fue l gases . Sinc e Octobe r

6,197 5 (40 F

R 46250) , affecte dfacilitie s choosin g t o monito r H2 S in th e fue

l gase s hav e bee n exempte dfro

mth e monitorin g requirement s o

f § 60.105(a)(4) becaus e PS' s fo r H2 S CEMS' s ha dno t

bee n established

. Thi s rulemakin g propose s t o amen dth e emissio n monitorin g requirement s t o en dthi s exemption

. Th e effect o f thi s rulemakin g wil l b e t o requir e affecte dfacilitie s t o monito r SO 2 after fue l ga s combustio n or , a s a n alternative , H2

S i n th e fuel gas . Whe n fue l gase s ar e burne di n a combustio n device , th e H2 S i s converte d t o SOj

. Th e resultin g SO

2 concentratio n i s substantiall y les s tha n th e • correspondin g Hs S i n th e fue l ga s du e t o dilutio n fro

madde dcombustio n air

. Th e amoun t o f dilutio n ai r

require dfo

r complete fue

l ga s combustio n hinge s upo n th e makeu p o

f fuel ga s component s (primaril y hydroge n an dhydrocarbons ) an dthei r stochiometri c nee dfo

r oxygen . Th e EP A investigate danumbe r

o f typica l fue

l ga s composition s an dthei r combustio n product s an ddetermine d that , at zer o percen t

exces s air , th e concentratio n o f SO 2 forme dfro

m; 

### combustin g fue

l ga s containin g Hi S a t th e standar dleve l (162 ppm) range d fro m9 t o 2 5 pp mwithth e majorit

y of values betwee n 1 5 an d2

0 ppm ; Thi s agree s wit

hth e 15

- t o 20-ppmSO

2 leve l riotedi n ih e Backgroun dDocument t o th e propose dpetroleu mrefinerie s standard

. Realizin g th e complexity o f establishin g th e SO2/H2 S equivalenc y ; 

### o n acase-by-cas e basis , EP A ha s selecte d2 0 pp mt o represen t

th e . complianc e leve l fo

r SO2 ; I n addition , rathe r tha n requirin g monitorin g ofth e . effluen t after eac hcombustio n device , EP A i s allowin g th e monitorin g o f SC v after onl y on e o

f th e combustio n device s a s lon g a s tha t

on e locatio n accuratel y represent s th e fuel ga s bein g burne db y al l of th e combustio n devices

. Durin g 197 8 an d1982 , EP

A conducte d evaluation s o

f H 2 

### S CEMS' s an d conclude dtha t

acceptabl e H 2 

### S CEMS' s wer e no t availabl e (se e Sectio n 4 o f P S 7)

. However , aStat e agenc y an daloca l agenc y reporte dtha t

H 2 

### S CEMS' s hav e bee n installe dunde r

thei r jurisdictio n tha t ar e operatin g satisfactorily

. Certificatio n tes t

report s tha t

hav e bee n submitte dfo

r Agenc y revie w indicat e that , a t leas t i n thes e cases , acceptabl e CEM S accurac y an dcalibratio n drif t ar e attainable

. Othe r

dat afro mregulatory agencie s hav e show n varyin g degree s o f succes s i n certifyin g an dauditin g H 2 

### S CEMS's

. Mos t

o f thes e dat awer e take n fro mH a 

### S CEMS' s o

f th e sam e type ; an d instrumen t

performanc e appear s t o b e linke dt o operato r

an dmaintenanc e proficiency

. Thus , EP

A ha ddecide dt o allo w th e us e o

f H, S CEMS' s fo

r fue l gase s a s a n alternativ e t o SO i CEMS' s fo r combuste dfue

l gases . For

thi s purpose , P S 7 i s bein g proposed

. In reviewin g th e regulations , EP A determine dtha t

th e optio n o

f controllin g S0 2 

### after combustin g th e fue

l gase s wa s no t bein g used

. Also , thi s optio n doe s no t appea r t o b e a n economicall y feasibl e alternativ e fo

r future consideration

. Therefore , mentio n o f thi s contro l optio n i s bein g delete dfro mth e regulation

. Thi s action , however , doe s no t prohibi t th e us e o f suc hcontro l devices

. I n th e future , source s tha t desir e t o burn fue

l gase s containin g H 2 

### S i n exces s o

f 23 0 mg/dsc man dcontro l th e resultin g SO

2 emission s may petitio n th e Administratio n fo

r a n alternativ e complianc e demonstration

. Hydroge n sulfide an dTR S emitte d fro mClau s plant s ar e regulate db y standard s se t

at 1 0 an d30

0 ppm , respectively

. Tota l reduce dsuflur compounds , thoug hdetermine d separatel y fro

mTRS , ar e als o inclusiv e o f H 2 

### S b y definition

. Th e Agenc y ha s determine dtha t

it i s difficul t t o monito r th e disproportionat e concentration s p f M :i 

### * *H 2 

### S an dTR S o n acontinua l ba'sis',' A ' M''M' - 

### ' ' especiall y a t

level s nea r

th e standards

. A separat e determinatio n o f H»S apar t

, fro mTR S will therefor e riot

b e required , bu t onl y th e continuou s moriitoriri g of' ' '•'•'•: TRS

. Performanc e Specificatio n 5 an d" Metho d1 5 o

f 15 A ar e bein g propose da s th e mean s t o evaluat e th e TR S CEM S M performance;

- ••

• ;



### ---. •••••: • •;.:•':MMsv'-'''' ; 

### '"-" : 

### ' Fo r greate r flexibility , .EP

A i s als o j ; 

### \fjA'\r_ proposin g t o allo w theus e 6 f a^CEMS^-fM tha t oxidize s th e TR S compound s t o SOJ'' ; 

### 5 an danalyze s th e concentratio n of.the' ' A re^{dting:SOt. : 

### Rather'than^ti^ing'1d''^^.^'.^'^ determin e th e concentratio n o f SOi^^M M M equivalen t

t o th e TR S concentration;:? ; : ? 

### M •.-:. - EPA i s proposin g t o us e th e leve l df25 0 pp mSO a

### (dr

y basis , zer o percen t

exces s M ! 

### .' ; air ) t o represen t

th e SO s 

### complianc e ;;i;jf;-M ^ level

. Thi s concentratio n i s consistentMl, : M withth e contro l optio n o

f combustin g •'"'•• th e effluent

gase s unde r

§ 60;i02(a)(2)(i)

. I n additio n t o th e abov e changes , EP A i s proposin g t o clarif

y ambiguitie s in th e existin g regulation s b y correctin g inconsistencie s an db y specifyin g : pertinen t testin g procedure s tha t originall y wer e onl y implied ; Thi s rulemakin g doe s no t impos e , M emissio n measuremen t

requirement s ' beyon dthos e specifie di n th e curren t - regulations , no r

doe s i t chang e any . ' emissio n standar do r

rhake i t riiore"" stringent

. Rather , th e rulemakin g wil l facilitat e th e us e o

f acceptabl e CEMS' s an dallo w affecte dfacilitie s t o compl y - withmonitorin g requirement s t o which " the y ar e alread y subject

. | HI

. Administrativ e Requirement s A. Public Hearing A publi c hearin g wil l b e held , if requested , t o discus s th e propose d revision s i n accordanc e withsectio n 307(d)(5 ) of

th e Clean Ai r

Act

. Person s wishin g t o mak e ora l presentations , .;: „ shoul dcontrac t

EP A a t th e address. ; :•..'.:. •:.-

. give n i n th e ADDRESSES section'o f thi s preamble

. Ora l presentation s wil l b e • ; limite dt o 1 5 minute s each

. An y member of th e publi c ma y file awritte n A:"-.- statemen t withEP A before , during , o r withi n 3 0 day s after

th e hearing

. Writte n statement s shoul db e addresse dt o th e Centra l Docke t

Sectio n addres s give n i n th e ADDRESSE S 

### sectio n o

f thi s preamble

. A verbati mtranscrip t

o f th e hearin g • an dwritte n statement s wil l b e availabl e fo r publi c inspectio n an dcopyin g durin g norma l workin g hour s a t

EPA' s Centra l Docke t Sectio n in Washington , DC (se e ADDRESSE

S sectio n o

f thi s preamble)

. B. Docket 

### Th e docke t

i s an organize dan d complet e file o

f al l th e informatio nP. 4



### ,857 2 *-.-.

—* Federa

l Register/Vol . 54 , No . 3 9 / Wednesday , Marc

h 1 , 198 9 /Propose d Ride s submittedt

o o r otherwis e consideredby EP A in th e developmen t

o f thi s propose d rulemaking

. Th e principa l purpose s o f th e docke t

ar e to : (1 ) allo w intereste d partie s t o identif

y an dlocat e document s s o tha t the y ca n effectively participat e in th e rulemakin g process , an d(2 ) serv e a s th e recor di n cas e of

judicia l revie w (excep t fo r interagenc y revie w materials ) (Sectio n 307(d)(7)(A))

. C. Office of

Management

and Budget Review • ' , ' Executiv e Orde r

1229 1 Review

. Unde r Executiv e Orde r

12291 , EP

A mus t judg e whethe r aregulatio n i s "major " and , therefore , subjec t

t o th e requiremen t

o f a regulatory impac t

analysis

. Thi s rulemakin g woul dno t

resul t i n an y o f th e advers e economi c effect s se t fort hi n sectio n 1 of

th e Orde r

a s ground s fo

r findin g a"majo r

rule. " I t wil l no t hav e a n annua l effect

o n th e economy o

f $10 0 millio n o r more , no r

wil l i t resul t in a major increas e i n cost s o r

prices

. Ther e wil l b e n o significant

advers e effect s o n competition , employment , investment , productivity , innovation , or o n th e abilit y o f U.S.-base denterprise s t o compete withforeign-base denterprise s in domesti c o r

export markets

. Thi s regulatio n wa s submitte dt o th e Office o f Managemen t

an dBudget

(OMB ) fo r revie w a s require db y Executiv e Orde r 12291

. D. Regulatory Flexibility Act Compliance Pursuan t t o th e provision s o

f 5 U.S.C

. 605(b) , I hereb y certif

y tha t thi s attache d rule , i f promulgated , wil l no t

hav e an y economi c impac t

o n smal l entitie s becaus e n o additiona l cost s wil l b e incurred

. Thi s rul e doe s no t

chang e an y - informatio n collectio n requirement s currentl y approve db y OM B unde r th e Paperwork

Reductio n Ac t

o f 1980,4 4 U.S.C

. 350 1 et

seg. Informatio n requirement s containe din"4 0 CF RPart 60 , Subpart

J ar e cleare dunde r

OM B contro l numbe r

2060-0022

. Lis t o f Subject s i n 40 CF

RPart 60 Ai r pollutio n control , Intergovernmenta l relations , Reportin g an drecordkeepin g requirements

. Incorporatio n b y reference , an d Petroleu mrefineries

. Date : Februar

y 19,1989

. Do n R

. Clay , Acting Assistant

Administrator

for Air and Radiation. It i s propose dtha t

40 CF RPar t 6 0 b e amende da s follows : PAR T60—[AMENDED

] 1

. Th e authority fo

r 40 CF RPart 60 continue s t o read : Authority : Section s 101 , 111 , 114,116 , an d 30 1 o f the Clea n Ai r Act, a s amende

d(4 2 IIS.C

. 7401 , 7411 , 7414

, 7416 , 7601)

. § 60.103 [Amended] 2

. In § 60.103(a) , th e phras e "gase s whic hcontai n carbo n monoxid e i n exces s of 0.05 0 percen t

b y volume. " i s revise dt o rea d"gase s tha t contai n carbo n monoxid e (CO ) i n exces s o f 50 0 pp mb y volume (dr

y basis). " 3

. I n S 60.104

. paragraph s (a)(1) , (2)(i) , an d(2)(ii ) ar e revise dt o rea da s follows : § 60.10 4 Standardfo

r sulfu r dioxide

. (a ) * * * 

### (1 ) Bu mi n an y fuel ga s combustio n devic e an y fuel ga s tha t

contain s : 

### hydroge n sulfid e (HbS ) i n exces s of 23 0 mg/dsc m(0.1 0 gr/dscf)

. Unde r emergenc y malfunctio n situations , th e combustio n in aflare o

f proces s upse t gase s or fue l ga s tha t i s release dt o th e flare a s aresul t

of relie f valv e leakag e i s exemp t fro mthi s paragraph

. (2 J * * * (ly^o j a n oxidatio n contro l syste mo r areoaarJo n control.syste mfollowe db y melioration , 25 0 pp mb y volum e (dry basis ) of sulfu r dioxid e (SO2

) a t zer o percen t exces s air

. (ii ) For areductio n contro l syste mno t followe db y incineration , 30 0 pp mb y volume of tota l reduce dsulfu

r (TRS ) compound s an d1 0 pp mb y volume o f hydroge n sulfid e (H2S) , eac hcalculate d a s pp mSO

2 b y volume (dry basis ) a t zer o percen t

exces s air

. 4

. In § 60.105 , paragraph s (a) , (d) , an d (e) ar e revise dto rea da s follows : §60.10 5 Emissio

n monitoring

. (a j Th e owne r

or operato r o f th e affecte dfacilit

y subjec t t o th e provision s o f thi s subpar t

shal l install , calibrate,'

. maintain , an doperat e continuou s emissio n monitorin g system s (CEMS's ) an dcontinuou s opacity monitorin g system s (COMS's ) a s follows : (1 ) For flui dcatalyti c crackin g uni t catalys t regenerator s subjec t

t o § 60.102(a)(2) , aCOM S fo r continuousl y measurin g an drecordin g th e opacit y o f emission s int o th e atmosphere

. Th e COM S shal l b e spanne da t 60 , 70

. o r 8 0 percen t opacity

. (2 ) For flui dcatalyti c crackin g uni t catalys t regenerator s subjec t

to § 60.103(a) , aCEMS fo

r continuousl y measurin g an drecordin g th e concentratio n b y volum e (dry basis ) of C O emission s int o th e atmosphere , excep t a s provide din paragrap h(ii ) below

. (i ) Th e spa n valu e for thi s CEM S i s t> ".[ 

# 1.00 0 pp mco . \Jrrj• (ii ) A C O CEM S nee dno t

b e installe d i f th e owne r

o r operato r demonstrate s tha t th e averag e C O emission s ar e les s tha n 5 0 pp m(dry basis ) an dals o file s a• writte n reques t

fo r exemptio n t o th e '•

" Administrato r

an dreceive s suc ha n "v

. exemption

. Th e demonstratio n shal l consis t o f continuousl y monitorin g C O emission s fo

r 3 0 day s usin g an '

. instrumen t

tha t shal l mee t

th e V A ••'..• requirement s of

Performanc e M - v'^-yy: '••-.

• Specificatio n 4 of

Appendi x B of

thi s '-••• • part
. Th e spa n valu e shal l b e 100 pp m"'•• C O instea dp

f 1,00 0 ppm , an dth e M > relativ e accurac y limi t

shal l b e 1 0 percen t of th e averag e C O emission s o r 5 pp mCO , whicheve r

i s greater
. Fo r

••' CEMS' s tha t

ar e identica l t o Metho d1 0 an demplo y th e sampl e conditionin g - • syste mof Metho d10A , th e alternativ e ; ! 

### relativ e accurac y tes t

procedur e i n Sectio n 10. 1 o

f Performanc e Specificatio n 2 may b e use din plac e o f th e relativ e accurac y test
. (3 ) Fo r fue l ga s combustio n device s subjec t t o § 60.104(a)(1) , aCEM S for continuousl y measurin g an drecordin g th e concentratio n b y volum e (dry basis , zer o percen t

exces s air ) o

f SO z emission s int o th e atmospher e (excep t wher e a n Hs S CEM S i s installe dunde r paragrap h(a)(4 ) o

f thi s section)

. Th e CEM S shal l includ e a n oxyge n monito r fo r correctin g th e dat afo

r exces s air

. (i ) Th e spa n value s fo

r thi s CEM S ar e 5 0 pp mSO

2 an d1 0 percen t

oxyge n (Oj)

. (ii ) Th e SO

2 monitorin g leve l equivalen t

t o th e H2S standar dunde r § 60.104(a)(1 ) shal l b e 2

0 pp m(dry basis , zer o percen t

exces s air)

. (iii ) Th e performanc e evaluation s fo r thi s SO 2 CEMS unde r

§ 60.13(c ) shal l us e Performanc e Specificatio n 2

. Method s 6 an d3 shal l b e use dfo

r conductin g th e relativ e accurac y evaluations

. Metho d6 sample s shal l b e take n a t aflo w rat e o

f 2 liters/mi n fo

r a t leas t 3 0 minutes

. Th e relativ e accurac y limi t

shal l b e 2

0 percen t o r 4 ppm , whicheve r

i s greater , an dtli e calibratio n drif

t limi t shal l b e 5 percen t o f th e establishe dspa n value

. (iv ) Fue l ga s combustio n device s havin g acommo n sourc e o f fue l ga s ma y b e monitore da t

onl y on e locatio n (i.e. , after on e o f th e combustio n devices) , i f monitorin g at

thi s locatio n accuratel y represent s th e SO

aemission s int o th e atmospher e fro

meac ho f th e combustio n devices

. (4)T n plac e o f th e SO aCEM S i n paragrap h(a)(3 ) o

f thi s section , aCEM S fo r continuousl y measurin g an d recordin g th e concentratio n (dr y basis ) o f H2 S in fue l gase s before bein g burne d in an y fue l ga s combustio n device

.P. 5

~«ri j 

### .•:federal ; Registe r

/ ¥61/54 , NoJdd

)NWednesday\ ; 

### M^ ^ (i ) Th e spa n valu e fo rthi s CEM S i s 42 5 mg/dsc m HaS . (ii ) Fue l ga s combustio n device s havin g acommo n sourc e o f fue l ga s ma y b e monitore d a tonl y on e location , i f monitorin g a tthi s locatio n accuratel y represent s th e concentratio n o f H2S i n , th e fue l ga s bein g burned . (iii ) Th e performanc e evaluation s fo r thi s HaS CEM S unde r§ 60.13(c ) shal l us e Performanc e Specificatio n 7. Metho d 1 1 shal l b e use d fo rconductin g th e relativ e accurac y evaluations . (5 ) Fo rClau s sulfu rrecover y plant s wit h oxidatio n contro l system s o r• reductio n contro l system s foli o we d b y incineratio n subjec tt o § 60.104(a)(2)(i) , a CEM S fo rcontinuousl y measurin g an d recordin g th e concentratio n (dry basis , . zer o percen texces s air ) o f SO 2 emission s int o th e atmosphere.Th e CEM S shal l includ e a n oxyge n monito r fo rcorrectin g th e dat afo rexces s air . (i ) Th e spa n value s fo rthi s CEM S ar e 50 0 pp m SO 2 an d 1 0 percen tO2 . ' (ii ) Th e performanc e evaluation s fo r thi s SO aCEM S unde r§ 60.13(c ) shal l us e Performanc e Specificatio n 2 . Method s 6 an d 3 shal l b e use d fo rconductin g th e relativ e accurac y evaluations . (6 ) Fo rClau s sulfu rrecover y plant s wit h reductio n contro l systein s ho t followe d b y incineratio n subjec tt o . § 60404(a)(2)(ii) , aGEMS.fo r continuousl y measurin g an d recordin g th e concentratio n o f

TR S an d O

a ' emission s int o th e atmosphere . Th e TR S emission s shal l b e calculate d a s SO aM (dr y basis , zer o percen texces s air) . (i ) Th e spa n value s fo rthi s CEM S ar e 45 0 ppi n TR S an d 1 0 percen tO2 ; (ii ) Th e performanc e evaluation s fo r thi s TR S (an d Oa

) CEM S unde r§ 60.13(c ) shal l us e Performanc e Specificatio n 5 , excep tth e calibratio n drif tspecificatio n i s 2. 5 percen to f

th e spa n valu e rathe r tha n 5 percent . Method s 1 5 o r15 A an d Metho d 3 shal l b e use d fo rconductin g th e relativ e accurac y evaluations . I f Metho d 3 yield s O

aconcentration s belo w 0.2 5 percen tdurin g th e performanc e specificatio n test , th e C v concentratio n ma y b e assume d t o b e zer o an d th e TR S CEM S nee d no t includ e a n O

amonitor . (7 ) I n plac e o f

th e TR S CEM S unde r paragrap h (a)(6 ) o f

thi s section , aCEM S usin g a n ai ro rO

adilutio n an d oxidatio n syste m t o conver tth e TR S t o SOafo r continuousl y measurin g an d recordin g th e concentratio n (dr y basis , zer o percen texces s air ) o f

th e resultan tSOa. Th e CEM S shal l includ e a n oxyge n monito rfo rcorrectin g th e dat afo r exces s oxygen . (i ) Th e spa n value s fo rthi s CEM S ar e 37 5 pp m SO

2 an d 1 0 percen tOa

. (ii ) Fo rreportin g purposes , tthe'SO a

exceedanc e leve l fo rthi s CEM S i s 25 0 pp m (dr y basis , zer o percen texces s air) . (iii ) Tri e performanc e evaluation s fo r thi s SO a(an d Oa

) CEM S unde r§ 60.13(c ) shal l us e Performanc e Specificatio n 5 . Method s 1 5 o r15 A an d Metho d 3 shal l b e use d fo rconductin g th e relative.''.. . accurac y evaluations . _ f (d ) Fo rari y flui d catalyti ccrackin g uni tcatalys tregenerato runde r§ 60.10 2 tha tuse s a n incinerator-wast e heat ; '* : ' boile rt o combus tth e exhaus tgase s >; M from th e catalys tregenerator] : th e owne r o roperato rshal l recor d dail y th e rateo f combustio n o f

liqui d o rsoli d fossil-fuel s (litere/h ro rkg/hr ) an d m e hour s o f M- M operatio n durin g whic h liqui d o rsoli d r>

- fossil-fuel s ar e combuste d mtheM. ; - incinerator-wast e hea tboiler . ' M M (e ) Fo rth e purpose s o f

report s unde r § 60.7(c) , period s o f

exces s emission s tha tshal l b e determine d an d reporte d ar e define d a s follow s (Note : Al l ; averages , excep tfo ropacity , shal l b e determine d a s th e arithmeti caverag e o f th e applicabl e 1-hou raverages , e.g. , th e rollin g 3-hou raverag e shal l b e determine d a s th e arithmeti caverag e o f . 3 contiguou s 1-hou raverages) : "'."; " AJ "' (1) Opacity : Al l 1-hourperiod s tha t coritaintw o o rmor e 6-itiinutfeperibd s y ; durin g whic h th e averag e opacit y a s ; measure d b y th e COMS urider " M M -'4 ;''-' § 60.105(a)(1 ) exceed s 3 0 percent . J' (2 ) CarbonmonbJdde. Al l l-houiM ; 'M " period s durin g whic^juie"ayerage!lb0 ! concentrationasmeasure d jbyitheC O CEM S unde r§ 60.105(a)(2 ) exceed s 50 0 ppm . '• • '••;.;_, (3 ) Sulfurdioxide from fuel gas combustion. (i ) Al l rollin g 3-hou rperiod s durin g whic h th e averag e concentratio n o f SO a a s measure d b y th e SO2 CEM S unde r § 60.105(a)(3 ) exceed s 2 0 pp m (dr y basis , zer o percen texces s air) ; or . ; . (ii ) Al l rollin g 3-hou rperiod s durin g whic h th e averag e concentratio n o f Ha S a s measure d b y th e HaS CEM S unde r § 60.105(a)(4 ) exceed s 23 0 mg/dsc m (0.1 0 gr/dscf) . •' : M : ; .••: . , (4 ) Sulfurdioxide from Claus sulfur, recovery plants. (i ) Al l 12-hou rperiod s dinin g whic h th e averag e concentration , o f SO2 a s . measure d b y th e SO

aCEM S unde r § 60.105(a)(5 ) exceed s 25 0 pp m (dr y basis , zer o percen texces s air) ; o r (ii ) Al l 12-hou rperiod s durin g whic h th e averag e concentratio n o f TR S (a s SOa) a s measure d b y th e TR S CEM S unde r§ 60.105(a)(6 ) exceed s 30 0 ppm ; o r (iii ) Al l 12-hou rperiod s durin g whic h th e averag e concentratio n o f SOaa s measure d b y th e SO

aCEM S unde r § 60.105(a)(7 ) exceeds25 0 j#fo;$jrj^vj / basis , zer o percen texces s air);:6r>l;;;V r §60.10 6 Tes t method s an d procedures..
- (a ) I n conductin g th e performance*" ) - test s require d i n % 60.8 , th e owne rorM M operato rshal l us e a s referenc e methods, " v an d procedure s th e tes tmethod s ins^MM";-: • Appendi x A'o f

thi s pa rto r6ther-M##r £ M ' method s an d procedure s as i specifiedi n • : 0 , thi s section , excep ta s provided*in;VbVfei ; > - ' . § 60.8(b) . . .-. ; >• MM.M «• .?:MM5# : ^M : M M -. ' (b ) Th e dWne ro roperat<&Miyi^fif?&? M \'• determinecomplianc e withtih e ^|f/|^M, : ' particulat e mattef(PM ) stahllardsHnv).?'^r:. . §60;102(a

j a s follows:-:M^^rf^^lM M -(1 ) Th e eiriissibr i rate'^ofM'1ih^| A A <becomputed.fo r'Saih-i^-w^'ttie^*^;''- 1 followiri g equiatidri: " VM? ^AJfrh:'ijTiAA- : ;

K-(cs'QJ^. : •'"•':?••: R « where:', ; '•' . M . M':'."""?:. ' E=Emissio n rat e o f

PM , kg/lOOO k g (lb/100 0 lb ) o f

cok e burn-of

t,4 ^ ; £

. C„=Concentratio n o f

PM , g/dscm;(lb / •dscf).'••••:.'., ;'•: ; 'A.J\, : J,J\\ A.yy -A.y G^ ^ VPlifinetri cflow rat e o f effluent. • gas , dscm/h r(dscf/hrJM' M 'M ' M * M " [. •'. Rc^Gok e bito-off,"fate, ' k g cpke/h r(l b cpke/hr).; ^ ^v: ; ;••••>-.-'.'• Jyvv.irrAAJ

A "' • • ' '•• iC=Gottversi6 h factor]1; 0 k g Vg)/(100 0

. kgj.llO^lb/flOM^lM^^ii^i^ ^ : • : (2)Method5shallbe;used:tp^MM M determin e th e concentation/(c s ) o f PM; 1 an d voluinetri cflo w rat e (Q„i ) o f th e j effluen tgas . Th e samplin g tim e an d sampl e volum e fo reac h ru n shal l b e a t leas t6 0 minute s an d 0.9 0 dsc m (31. 8

. dscf) . MM M ; . • .-.- . • .„.,. ;.--, . (3 ) Th e cok e burn-of

f rat e (R J shal l b e compute d fo reac h ru n usin g th e ^M" • • followin g equation : M v M:, - V-M^-MMM / 

### Rc=k i Or (*cc%+%c6a)+k

aQ D 

### -ki Q, ' [(%qo/2j+^cpa+%o,j; : 

### ; ; \yy.;y-r where:.-- ' .^ : '••••a-••--;•;• <•'•-•• • • ->-•..-£ y-j^ , R,=Cok e bunwif

f rate,kg/h r(lb/hr);' ; M. : ; Q , ^Volumetri c flow rat e o f exhaus tga s -

* fro m catalys tregenerato rbefor e enterin g the 1 emissio n contro l system ; dscm/mi n (dscf/M- ; 'min). : . '•'.. '..'.. • •

' ;./;.-• • a : . ;.';v.; : *'-»i - • A'• -rA••:-."'> Q.=Volumetri c flow faite o f ai rtp'FCCU : ; regenerator , a s determine d from th e flui d catalyti c crackin g uni tcontro l roo m • • instrumentation , dscm/mi n (dscf/min) . ' %COt=Carbo n dioxid e concentration , percen tb y volum e (dr y basis) . %CO=Carbo n monoxid e concentration , percen tb y volume.(dr y basis) . %Oa=Oxyge n concentration , percen tb y volum e (dr y basis) . Ki=Materia l balanc e an d conversio n factor , 0.298 2 (kg-min)/(hr-dscm-% ) (0.018 6 (lb-min)/(hr-dscf-%)] .P, 6



### .-•.Federal,.Register ; /

Mo\.)-4yN6.> 39,7.Wedjiesdayir March y^,il9S9r/i^pppsedJ^ale s . ..;MM : "'MMJ£ M K2=Materia

l balanc e an

dconversio

n • factor, 2.088 (kg-min)/fhr-dscm-%) , (0.130 3 (lb

min)/(hr-dscf-%)]

. K3=Materia

l balanc e an

dconversio

n factor, 0.099

4 (kg-min)/(hr-dscm-% ) [0.006 2 (lb-min)/(h«tscMS)]

. ''••••_yr-...'•••• (i) Metho d2 shal l b e use dt o - determin e th e volumetri c flow rat e (Q r )

.

- - (ii ) Th e emissio n correctio n factor , integrate dsamplin g an danalysi s procedur e o f

Metho d3 shal l b e use dt o determineCOi,;CO?andC£^ M M-''' ' concentrations

. -

M M•*.£•>"•

.-'••>-A -• • (4) Metho d9 an dth e procedure s of ' : § eo.ll.shal l b e use dt o determine:';.r , -opacity , ^y 'srwMf^MiK/M^-^M ^ aA. (c ) I f auxiliar y liqui do r

soli dfossil- , •; fuel s ar e burne di n a n incinerator-wast e hea t boiler , th e owne r

o r operato r shal l determin e th e emissio n rat e of.PM : permitte di n § 60.102(b ) a s follows : : . (1 ) Th e allowabl e emissio n rat e (Eo ) of P M shal l b e compute dfo

r eac hru n usin g th e following equation :

E„=1.0+A(H/RJK ' where : E„=Emissio

n rat e o f P M allowed , kg/10

0 k g (lb/100 0 lb ) o f cok e burn-of f i n catalys t regenerator
. . 1.0=Emi88io

n standard , k

g coke/100 0 k g fi b coke/1080 lb)

. .. . ..' • A=Allowable incrementa

l rat e o f P M emissions , 0.1 8 g/millio

n ca l (6.1 0 lb/million Btu)

. H=Heat inpu t rate fro msolido r liqui d fossi l fuel, millio

n cal/hr (millio n Btu/hr)

. Re=Cok e burn-of f rate , k g coke/h r (l b coke/hr)

. '• ' K'=Conversion facto

r t o units o f standard , •IJ O fkg E /g)/(10t} 0 kg

) (10 s lb/(100

0 lb)]

. (2 ) Procedure s subjec t

t o th e approva l o f th e Administrato r

shal l b e use dt o determin e th e hea t

inpu t rate. ' ' - (3 ) Th e procedur e i n paragrap h(b)(3 ) o f thi s sectio n shal l b e use dt o determin e th e cok e burn-of f rat e (RJ

. (d ) Th e owne r

o r operato r shal l determin e complianc e withth e C O standar di n § 60.103(a

) b y usin g th e integrate dsamplin g techniqu e of Metho d1 0 t o determin e th e GO concentratio n (dr

y basis)

. Th e samplin g time fo r eac hru n shal l b e 60 minutes

. (e) Th e owne r

o r operato r shal l

. determin e compUanc e withth e Ha S standar di n § 60.104(a)(1 ) a s follows : Metho d1 1 shal l b e use df o determin e th e Ha S concentration

. Th e gase s enterin g th e samplin g trai n shoul db e a t abou t atmospheri c pressure . I

f th e pressur e i n th e refiner

y fuel ga s line s i s relativel y high , aflow contro l valv e may b e use dt o reduc e th e pressure . I f th e lin e pressur e i s highenoug ht o operat e th e samplin g trai n withou t avacuu m pump , th e pum

p ma y b e eliminate dfro

m th e samplin g train

. Th e sampl e shal l b e draw n fro mapoin t nea r th e centroi do

f th e fuel ga s line

. Th e samplin g tim e an d sampl e volume shal l b e a t leas t 1 0 minute s an d0.01 0 dsc m(0.3 5 dscf)

. Tw o

sample s o f

equa l samplin g time s shal l

.. - b e take n a t

abou t 1-hou r intervals

. Th e arithmeti c averag e o

f thes e tw o sample s shal l constitut e arun . Fo r mos t fuel

. gases,'samplin g time s exceedin g 2 0

. A

minute s niay resul t

i n depletio n o

f thi e collectio n solution ; althoug hfuel gase s containin g lo w concentration s of.HaS may necessitat e s_amplin

g fo r longer period s of

time

. *. ; (f j Theownero r

operato r shal l 'AA determin e complianc e withth e SOaan d th e HaSl.^ndTR S standard s m*-J&yX- : § 60.104(a)(2) a s follows : M ; -rxM • Oi j K (1 ) Metho d® shal l b e use dt o Av A determin e theiSC

V concentration/Th e : concentratio n i s mg/dsc m(lb/dscf ) v obtaine db y Metho d6 i s multiplie db y , 0.3754 t o obtai n th e concentratio n i n : ppm . Th e samplin g poin t

i n th e duc t

') shal l b e th e centroi do f

th e cros s sectio n i f th e cross-sectiona l are ai s les s tha n 5.0 0 m 2 (54ft

2) o r a t apoin t n o close r t o th e wall s tha n 1.0

0 m(3 9 in. ) if

th e cross sectiona l are ai s 5.0

0 m 2 o r mor e an dth e centroi di s mor e tha n 1 mfro mth e wall

. Th e samplin g time an dsampl e volume shal l b e a t

leas t 1 0 minute s an d0.01 0 dsc m(0.3 5 dscf

) fo r eac hsample

. Eigh

t sample s o f equa l samplin g time s shal l b e take n a t

abou t 30-minute intervals

. Th e arithmeti c averag e of thes e 8 sample s shal l constitut e arun . Metho d4 shal l b e use dt o determin e th e moistur e conten t o f th e gases . Th e samplin g poin t fo r Metho d4 shal l b e adjacen t t o th e . samplin g poin t

for Metho d6

. Th e samplin g tim e fo r

eac hsampl e shal l b e equa l t o th e time i t

take s fo r tw o Metho d 6 samples

. Th e moistur e conten t fro m thi s sampl e shal l b e use dt o correc t th e correspondin g Metho d6 sample s for moisture

. Fo r

documentin g th e oxidatio n efficienc y o

f th e contro l devic e fo

r tota l reduce dsulfu

r compounds , Metho d1 5 shal l b e use dfollowin g th e procedure s o f paragrap h(f)(2) o

f thi s section

. (2) Metho d1 5 shal l b e use dt o determin e th e TR S an dHa S concentrations

. Eac hru n shal l consist s o f 1 6 sample s take n ove r

aminimumo

f 3 hours

. Th e samplin g poin t shal l b e th e sam e a s tha t

describe dfo

r Metho d6 i n paragrap h(f)(1 ) o

f thi s section

. Th e ensur e minimumresidenc e tim e fo r th e sampl e insid e th e sampl e lines , th e samplin g rat e shal l b e a t

leas t 3. 0 lp m (0.1 0 cfm)

. Th e SOaequivalen t for eac h ru n shal l b e calculate dafter bein g correcte dfo

r moistur e an doxyge n a s th e arithmeti c averag e o f th e SOa equivalen t

fo r eac hsampl e durin g th e run . Metho d4 shal l b e use dt o determin e th e mositur e conten t

of th e gase s a s i n paragrap h(f)(1 ) of

thi s section

. Th e samplin g time fo

r eac hsampl e shal l b e equa l t o th e tim e i t

take s fo r fou r Metho d1 5 samples

. (3 ) Th e oxyge n concentratio n use dt o correc t th e emissio n rat e fo r

exces s air : shal l b e obtaine db y th e integrate d samplin g aii danalysi s procedur e of - , .•* ; Metho d3

. Th e sample s shal l b e take n •/ : simultaneousl y withth e SCvTR S an d; HaS , o f moistur e samples/TheJJOiiv , „;- , TRS , an dHa

S sample s shal l b e correcte d t o zer o percen t

exces s ai r

usin g th e , M foUoiwn g equation: '"AAA-

- MMMMV^ M '

- !-...'.

. .J<-iTV°

. ./ * >.*,<•-».; • :•,.-'-

. ..... . •:.- ? ?....'•:£•?•{•''"<••*:,


### c c 

### = c M : M20.9'^i%OaJ,

Wl-.'

. where:. , . .,/•. .-..;

• ? . r,-, ... - •-' ' ',., .-•• ;..•.-. : '•;.- • M Ct=Cprrecte' dconcentration o f poUutant ; , . pp mby-volum

e (dr y basis). :

. .; '

. 'AAyyJr. C"<= MeasuKfdconcientration'b f pbliutanifM?

. pp mbyvolum

e (dr y IwRlsJ-^r-'^-^'-^-^r^V;^;

- %Os=Oxyge

n concentration , percen

t by:».

- > ' volum e (dr y basis)

. .--'-,- M [F RDoc

. 89-472 1 File

dZ-28T89 ; 8:4

5 am ]
BILLING COD E 6S8ft-50-( 3
DEPARTMEN

T O FTOE INTERIOR..

. Fis han dWildlif

e Servic e ' ' "

. 5 0 CF RPar t H ? •*.- • ••••'• ( • • • Endangere dan dIThiirsaSene dWildlif e - an dPlants ; Propose dEmudamgeredl

. ' Statu s tor

Quee n Alexandra' s Btirdwlng
AGEMCV : Fis han dWildif e Service, Interior

. , : . . .. ; -.«•>
. - i flCimOM: Propose drule..

. - :•. . ' SUMMARY

: Th e Servic e propose s t o . determin e endangere dstatu s for Quee n Alexandra' s birdwin g butterfl y [Troides (= OmithopteraJ

alexandrae). Thi s species , th e world' s larges t butterfly , . occur s onl y i hasmal l par t o f Papu a Ne w Guinea , wher e i t

i s rar e an di s losin g it s restrictedfores t habita t t o logging an dagricultura l activity

. Thi s proposal , i

f mad e final , woul d implemen t

th e protectio n of

th e Endangere dSpecie s Ac t

o f 1973 , a s amended , fo

r thi s butterfly

. Th e Servic e seek s relevan t

dat aan dcomment s from th e public

. DATES : Comment s mus t

b e receive db y Ma y 1,1989

. Publi c hearin g request s mus t b e receivedb y Apri l 17,1989

. ADDRESSES : Comment s an dmaterial s concernin g thi s proposa l shoul db e sen t t o Chief , Offic e o f

Scientifi c Authority ; Mai l Stop : Roo m527 , Matomi c Building ; U.S

. Fis han dWildlif

e Service ; Washington , DC 20240

. Comment s an d material s receive dwil l b e availabl e fo r publi c inspectio n fro

m8:0 0 a.m . t o 4:0

0