alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
970.1504-5 Solicitation provision and contract clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 970.5215-1, Total Available Fee: Base Fee Amount and Performance Fee Amount, in management and operating contracts, and other contracts determined by the Senior Procurement Executive, or designee, that include cost-plus-award-fee arrangements. ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall include the clause with its Alternate I when the award fee cycle consists of two or more evaluation periods.
( 2 ) The contracting officer shall include the clause with its Alternate II when the award fee cycle consists of one evaluation period.
( 3 ) The contracting officer shall include the clause with its Alternate III when the DOE Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, requires the contractor to submit a self-assessment.
( 4 ) The contracting officer shall include the clause with its Alternate IV when the DOE Operations/Field Office Manager, or designee, permits the contractor to submit a self-assessment at the contractor's option.
( b ) ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 970.5215-3, Conditional Payment of Fee, Profit, and Other Incentives—Facility Management Contracts, in all DOE management and operating contracts and other contracts determined by the Senior Procurement Executive, or designee.
( 2 ) The contracting officer shall include the clause with its Alternate I in contracts that do not contain the clause at 952.204-2, Security.
( 3 ) The contracting officer shall include the clause with its Alternate II in contracts that are awarded on a cost-plus-award-fee basis. The contracting officer should consider including the clause with its Alternate II in contracts that are awarded on a multiple fee basis if the cost-plus-award-fee portion of the contract is significant.
( c ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 970.5215-4, Cost Reduction, in management and operating contracts, and other contracts determined by the Senior Procurement Executive, or designee, if cost savings programs are contemplated.
( d ) The Contracting officer shall insert the provision at 970.5215-5, Limitation on Fee, in solicitations for management and operating contracts, and other contracts determined by the Senior Procurement Executive, or designee.
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 69 FR 68781, Dec. 10, 2003; 71 FR 16243, Mar. 31, 2006; 74 FR 36372, 36378, July 22, 2009]
§ 15b.38 Health care facilities. ( a ) *Communications.* A recipient that provides notice concerning benefits or services or written material concerning waivers of rights or consent to treatment shall take such steps as are necessary to ensure that qualified handicapped persons, including those with impaired sensory or speaking skills, are not denied effective notice because of their handicap.
( b ) *Emergency treatment for the hearing impaired.* A recipient hospital that provides health services or benefits shall establish a procedure for effective communication with persons with impaired hearing for the purpose of providing emergency health care.
( c ) *Drug and alcohol addicts.* A recipient to which this subpart applies that operates a general hospital or outpatient facility may not discriminate in admission or treatment against a drug or alcohol abuser or alcoholic who is suffering from a medical condition, because of the person's drug or alcohol abuse or alcoholism.
§ 1599.3 Eligibility and conflicts of interest. ( a ) A private voluntary organization, a cooperative, or another organization that is not an intergovernmental organization is eligible to submit an application under this part to become a recipient under the McGovern-Dole Program. FAS will set forth specific eligibility information, including any factors or priorities that will affect the eligibility of an applicant or application for selection, in the full text of the applicable notice of funding opportunity posted on the U.S. Government website for grant opportunities.
( b ) Applicants, recipients, and subrecipients must comply with policies established by FAS pursuant to 2 CFR 400.2(a), and with the requirements in 2 CFR 400.2(b), regarding conflicts of interest.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Improving Youth Defense      

# Resource: Improving Youth Defense

This fact sheet (PDF, 1 page) describes programs, training, and technical assistance for juvenile public defenders. Research shows that barriers to juveniles’ receipt of proper counsel include juvenile defenders’ excessive caseloads, inadequate compensation for public defenders, and a lack of juvenile-specific training for lawyers. **Learn more.**
#### Motes *v.*Carter.

*Statutory Seal Action in the Nature of Ejectment.*

1. *Conveyance of homestead; when wife’s acknowledgment insufficient.*A certificate of the acknowledgment of the wife to a conveyance of the homestead, executed in 1881, that “ she signed the same of her own free will and accord, without fear, constraint, or persuasion of her husband,” omitting the words “or threats,” required by the amendatory act of February 9th, 1877 (Pamph. Acts, 1876-7, p. 33), is insufficient to divest the title to the homestead.

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

Tried before Hon John P. Hubbard.

This was a statutory real action in the nature of ejectment, brought by P. D. Motes against "William Carter, and was commenced on 10th February, 1883. The plaintiff claimed title under a mortgage executed by the defendant and his wife on 9th February, 1881; the land conveyed thereby, and sought to be recovered in this action, constituting, at the time of the execution of the mortgage, and of the institution of the suit, the defendant’s homestead. The plaintiff having offered in evidence the mortgage, the defendant objected thereto, on the ground that the certificate of his wife’s acknowledgment did not conform to the statute. The court sustained the objection, refused to allow the mortgage to be read to the jury; and to this ruling the plaintiff excepted, and took a nonsuit. The language of the certificate is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

The ruling above noted is here assigned as error.

Parks & Son, for appellant.

*554Gardner & Wiley, *contra.*

STONE, J.-

— The present statutory real action rests its right of recovery on a mortgage of the homestead, made by husband and wife. The sufficiency of the certificate of the wife’s acknowledgment is the question for our consideration. The mortgage was executed and acknowledged in February, 1881. The language of the certificate is, that she acknowledged “ she signed the same of her own free will and accord, without fear, constraint or persuasion of her husband.” This is the exact language of the act, approved April 23, 1873. — Pampli. Acts, 65-G. The law remained without change, until the later statute was enacted on the subject, approved - February 9, 1877. — Pampli. Acts, 33-é. The form of acknowledgment prescribed by that statute is, “that she signed the same of her own free will and accord, and without fear, constraint, or threats on the part of the husband.” The sufficiency of the certificate before us, it will be observed, must be tested by the later statute.

Ordinarily, it would seem, the absence of fear and constraint would imply that there had been no threats, which could have influenced the wife’s conduct. The history of this legislation, however, forces us to a different interpretation. The- act of 1873 contained the words fear and constraint. The act of 1877 snperadded the word threats, and we must presume the legislature had some object in doing so. It would violate all rules of interpretation to hold that- the added word had no purpose. The certificate was insufficient to divest the title of the home*stead.*— Scott *v. Simms,*70 Ala. 352.

Affirmed.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 19, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-875

Lower Tribunal No. 15-16487

________________

Progressive Waste Solutions of FL., Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Tavares Britt,

Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge.

Baker & Hostetler LLP, and Robert W. Thielhelm, Jr., and Robert D. Sowell

(Orlando), for appellant.

Goldberg and Hirsh, P.A., and Jeffrey S. Hirsh; Akerman LLP, and Gerald

B. Cope, Jr., Michael B. Chavies, Ilana Tabacinic, and Naim S. Surgeon; Payer &

Associates, and James D. Payer, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Given the actual notice Appellant received of the pending lawsuit

and various critical proceedings therein, including the notice of trial, and the fact

that there was no contact between Appellant and Appellee’s counsel regarding

Appellant’s claim against Appellee, we find this case clearly distinguishable from

M.W. v. SPCP Group V, LLC, 163 So. 3d 518, 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015), and

affirm because the judgment was therefore not void under the authority of Bank of

New York Mellon v. Condominium Association of La Mer Estates, Inc., 175 So.

3d 282, 285 (Fla. 2015) (quoting Curbelo v. Ullman, 571 So. 2d 443, 445 (Fla.

1990) (“It is well settled that where a court is legally organized and has jurisdiction

of the subject matter and the adverse parties are given an opportunity to be heard,

then errors, irregularities or wrongdoing in proceedings, short of illegal deprivation

of opportunity to be heard, will not render the judgment void.”)).

2
#### §§ 1710.211-1710.249 [Reserved]
#### Board of Managers of Village House, Respondent-Appellant, v Paris B. Frazier et al., Appellants-Respondents.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 12, 1979, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, affirmed, without costs. We agree with Special Term that defendant Frazier violated Justice Nadel’s order, entered March 28, 1979, and the by-laws by leasing and permitting the occupancy of his condominium unit without giving the plaintiff board the right of first refusal. For this reason, Special Term correctly granted the preliminary injunction. However, since the plaintiff board did not make a clear showing that the so-called "common charges” were properly entered against defendant Frazier’s unit, we would not have granted an injunction on that ground. We also take this opportunity to correct a factual misstate*564ment in the memorandum decision at Special Term. The plaintiff board never alleged in its papers that defendant Frazier was permitting defendants Bressan and Young to use the condominium unit for purposes of prostitution. Because there is some indication in the record that defendant Frazier believed he was proceeding within the parameters of Justice Nadel’s order, it cannot be definitively concluded that he deliberately disobeyed that order. Hence, the branch of the motion to punish for contempt was appropriately denied. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Lane, Lupiano and Lynch, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Click It or Ticket Campaign Resources Now Available      

# Resource: Click It or Ticket Campaign Resources Now Available

The Click It or Ticket campaign, occurring May 23 – June 5, 2022, is a national seat belt enforcement mobilization effort that focuses on safety education, strong laws, and law enforcement support to save lives. 2022 Campaign videos and graphics are now available on this webpage.
§ 1724.72 Notice and publication of listed contract forms. ( a ) *Notice.* Upon initially entering into a loan agreement with RUS, borrowers will be provided with all listed contract forms. Thereafter, new or revised listed contract forms promulgated by RUS, including RUS approved exceptions and alternatives, will be sent by regular or electronic mail to the address of the borrower as identified in its loan agreement with RUS.
( b ) *Availability.* Listed contract forms are published by RUS. Interested parties may obtain the forms from: Rural Utilities Service, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stop 1522, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 1522, Washington, DC 20250-1522, telephone number (202) 720-8674. The list of contract forms can be found in § 1724.74(c), List of Required Contract Forms.
[63 FR 58285, Oct. 30, 1998]
Exhibit (21)





SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT





Registrant owns 100% of the outstanding stock of each of the following corporations:



|                                             |  |                       
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name                                         |  | State of Incorporation
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company of Ohio       |  | Ohio                  
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville-Atlantic Insurance Company      |  | Georgia               
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company of New Jersey |  | New Jersey            
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Preferred Insurance Company     |  | Pennsylvania          
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Lake States Insurance Company   |  | Michigan              
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company               |  | Pennsylvania          
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company of New York   |  | New York              
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company     |  | Pennsylvania          
|                                             |  |
M. P. No. 79-510.

#### Frank Newman *et al. v.*Patrick T. Boyle *et al.*

Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.

*Letts, Quinn <bLicht, Daniel J. Murray, Joseph DeAngelis, Nicholas Trott Long,*for petitioners, *DeSimone <b- DelSesto Law Corporation, Herbert F. DeSimone, Gerard McG. DeCelles,*for respondents.

The order granting the request for permanent injunction is an appealable order and petitioners have appropriately filed a notice of appeal.

Therefore, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1671 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6937 Village Parkway in Dublin, California, 

as the ‘‘James ‘Jim’ Kohnen Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1671 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. JAMES ‘‘JIM’’ KOHNEN POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 6937 Village Parkway in Dublin, 

4 California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘James 

5 ‘Jim’ Kohnen Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James ‘Jim’ Kohnen 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1838 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1838

  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to apply the Medicaid 
primary care payment rate to additional physician providers of primary 
                             care services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 6, 2013

Mr. Stivers (for himself and Mr. Moran) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to apply the Medicaid 
primary care payment rate to additional physician providers of primary 
                             care services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enhanced Access to Medicaid Services 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PRIMARY CARE PAYMENT RATE FOR ADDITIONAL PHYSICIAN PROVIDERS OF 
              PRIMARY CARE SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1902(a)(13)(C) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(13)(C)) is amended by striking ``or pediatric'' and 
inserting ``neurology, psychiatry, obstetrics and gynecology, or 
pediatric''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of enactment of this Act and shall apply to 
medical assistance for primary care services provided on or after that 
date.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1734.28 Submission of applications. ( a ) Applications will be accepted as announced in the RUS DLT Program application guide and/or the RUS DLT Program Web site and in the funding opportunity posted on *www.Grants.gov* on an annual basis.
( b ) When submitting paper applications: ( 1 ) Applications for grants shall be submitted to the RUS, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 1590, Washington, DC 20250-1590. Applications should be marked “Attention: Assistant Administrator, Telecommunications Program”.
( 2 ) Applications must be submitted to RUS postmarked no later than the application filing deadline established by the Administrator if the applications are to be considered during the period for which the application was submitted. The deadline for submission of applications each fiscal year will be announced in the RUS DLT Program application guide and/or the RUS DLT Program Web site and in the funding opportunity posted on *www.Grants.gov* on an annual basis.
( 3 ) All applicants must submit an original and a digital copy of a completed application.
#### § 1710.124 Uniform Relocation Act.

Borrowers are required to comply with applicable provisions of 49 CFR part 24, which sets forth the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91-646; 84 Stat. 1894), as amended by the Uniform Relocation Act Amendments of 1987 (Pub. L. 100-17; 101 Stat. 246-256) and the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991.