alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Ukraine

On March 6, 2014, by Executive Order 13660, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of persons that undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets.

On March 16, 2014, the President issued Executive Order 13661, which expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13660, and found that the actions and policies of the Government of the Russian Federation with respect to Ukraine undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets.

On March 20, 2014, the President issued Executive Order 13662, which further expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13660, as expanded in scope in Executive Order 13661, and found that the actions and policies of the Government of the Russian Federation, including its purported annexation of Crimea and its use of force in Ukraine, continue to undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets.

On December 19, 2014, the President issued Executive Order 13685, to take additional steps to address the Russian occupation of the Crimea region of Ukraine.

On September 20, 2018, the President issued Executive Order 13849, to take additional steps to implement certain statutory sanctions with respect to the Russian Federation.

The actions and policies addressed in these Executive Orders continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on March 6, 2014, and the measures adopted on that date, on March 16, 2014, on March 20, 2014, on December 19, 2014, and on September 20, 2018, to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond March 6, 2021. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13660.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2021-04759

Billing code 3295-F1-P
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF FRANK AIELLO


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

     In connection with the Periodic Report of Cal Alta Auto Glass, Inc.,(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frank Aiello, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: December 5, 2005        By: /s/ Frank Aiello
                                                       -------------------
                                                        Frank Aiello
                                                        President
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Boardof Gladstone Investment Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on thedate hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (“Form 10-Q”), filedconcurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Dated: November 4, 2008

 
| /s/ David Gladstone                  | * * |
|--------------------------------------|----------|
| David Gladstone                      |
| *Chief Executive Officer and*        |
| *Chairman of the Board of Directors* |

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1658** 

MICHAEL EUGENE TANN , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.

JUDGE PAUL W. GRIMM; KIM MCDERMOTT , Defendants

– Appellees , and

U.S. MARSHALL, (name unknown) , Defendant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. William D. Quarles, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv
- 00926

- WDQ )

Submitted : November 20, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before GREGORY and SHEDD , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael Eugene Tann, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Eugene Tann appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) for
failure to state a claim . We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Tann v. Grimm , No. 1:14

- cv
- 00926

- WDQ (D. Md. June 6, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal cont entions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO RETENTION AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment to Retention Agreement (the
“Amendment”) is made and entered by and between Aerojet-General Corporation, its parents, subsidiaries and affiliates (the “Company”) and Richard W. Bregard (the “Executive”) as of February 12, 2013 (the
“Effective Date”). 
 The parties previously entered into a Retention Agreement dated February 6, 2012 (“Retention
Agreement”) for the purposes of retaining Executive during a period of transition for the Company through at least November 30, 2012. Since then, additional circumstances have arisen for which Executive’s unique skill, expertise and
talents are required, resulting in the need to amend some of the terms of the February 6, 2012, Retention Agreement to extend the retention period and continue to employ the Executive until at least May 31, 2013. 

In consideration of the covenants set forth in this Amendment and the Company’s agreement to pay additional compensation as outlined below, Company
and Executive, each intending to be legally bound, hereby agree to amend the Retention Agreement as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Paragraphs 1 (a), 4(a), 5, 6, 8, and 9(d) are all amended to delete the references to November 30, 2012 and replace with the date May 31, 2013. All other
terms of these paragraphs are unchanged. 

  

	 	2.	Paragraph 3 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following Paragraph 3: 


3. Duties and Title. Executive’s title shall remain the same as it was as of the Effective Date.
Executive’s specific duties during the retention period include (i.) continuing as Steering Committee Chair for the Company’s Oracle ERP implementation, accomplishing a successful go-live and continuing to provide leadership to the
implementation team as it transitions from implementation to on-going system support; (ii.) performing as leader of the Aerojet-Rocketdyne integration to achieve successful Day 1 operations as well as appropriate near-term follow-on
activities in preparation for stand-up of integrated organization; and (iii.) providing continuing leadership to the Program Management Center of Excellence. 
  

	 	3.	Paragraph 4(b) is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following: 


4. (b) The Retention Bonus shall consist of a lump sum payment equal to two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000), less
applicable withholdings and deductions. 
 4. To the extent not specifically amended herein, all other terms, conditions, and
covenants, in the Retention Agreement shall remain the same and in effect to the extent not specifically amended by this Amendment and are incorporated herein by reference. 

 

	
	INITIALS
	Executive: /s/ RWB
	Company: /s/ EAZ    



  
 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of M.L. Macadamia Orchards, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A(Amendment No. 2) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, theundersigned management of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that,

 

(3)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(4)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Wayne W. Roumagoux  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Wayne W. Roumagoux      |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 13, 2007       |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, as Principal Executive Officer and as Principal Financial Officer of Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. (the Company),
respectively, certify that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2010, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated therein. The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be relied upon
for any other purpose.



/s/ Paul E. HarringtonPaul E. HarringtonPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)August 12, 2010/s/ Mark A. TrippMark A. TrippChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)August 12, 2010


A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and will be retained by Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Investment Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the
date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2012 (Form 10-Q), filed
concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 28, 2013



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ David Watson                     
|David Watson                         
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
§ 1488.22 Communications. ( a ) Unless otherwise provided, written requests, notifications, or communications by the applicant pertaining to the financing agreement shall be addressed to the Assistant Sales Manager, Commercial Export Programs, Office of the General Sales Manager, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250.
( b ) [Reserved]
James Goldstene, Executive OfficerCalifornia Air Resources Board

10011 Street, 6th Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Re: Technical Systems Audit of the California Air Resources Board

Dear

I am writing to transmit the findings of EPA’s Technical System Audit (TSA) of the

California Air Resources Board ts(ARB) ambient air monitoring program. We conducted this

audit in 2007 in accordance with federal regulations that require us to conduct technical system

audits of Primary Quality Assurance Organizations (PQAO) every three years.

This audit was particularly important given the stature of your air monitoring program

and your oversight role ofthe twenty-two local districts in California that collect ambient air

monitoring data. In our audit, we reviewed ARI3’s network management, field and laboratoryoperations, quality assurance and data management procedures. We also looked at the airmonitoring programs of three ofthe local districts overseen by ARB in order to evaluate howeffectively ARI3 is fulfilling its role as a PQAO. The districts included in this audit were San

Joaquin Valley APCD, Great Basin Unified APCD and Northern Sierra AQMD.

In summary, our audit found that ARB’s ambient air monitoring program generally meets

or exceeds EPA requirements. However, we also found there is a need to strengthen ARI3’soversight role as a PQAO in order to ensure that all districts are collecting and processingambient air quality data in the same manner as ARB. We are confident that the findings

contained in this report can be addressed and we look forward to working with ARB toward this

end.

I thank you and your staff for recognizing the value of our audit and for your staffs full

cooperation and participation with us throughout the process.

C

Pnn:ed on Recycled Paper
Deborah Jordan

Director, Air Division

Enclosure

cc: Bill Loscutoff, ARB

Linda Murchison, ARB

Jeff Cook, ARB

Karen Magliano, ARB

Michael Poore, ARB

Ken Stroud, ARB

Ted Schade, Great Basin Unified APCD

Seyed Sadredin, San Joaquin Valley APCD

Gretchen Bennitt, Northern Sierra AQMD

2
#### § 1700.4 Public comments on proposed rules.

RUS requires that all persons submitting comments to a proposed rule or other document published by the agency in the Federal Register, submit comments as specified in the published notice. Copies of comments submitted are available to the public in conformance with 7 CFR part 1.

[71 FR 8435, Feb. 17, 2006]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1218

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1218 appear at 66 FR 37118, 37119, July 17, 2001, and 71 FR 77245, Dec. 26, 2006.

#### § 1218.21 Terminate.

*Terminate* means to issue a rule under section 553 of title 5, U.S.C., to cancel permanently the operation of an order or part thereof beginning on a date certain specified in the rule.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1685

ROBBIN LEGGETTE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CRYSTAL MOORE, Corporal; JOY CUTLER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.

(CA-02-1635-4)

Submitted: October 1, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robbin Leggette, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Charles Baxter,

RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, CARPENTER & ROBINSON, Myrtle Beach, South

Carolina; William Henry Davidson, II, David Leon Morrison, Matthew

Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia,

South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robbin Leggette appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Leggette v. Moore,

No. CA-02-1635-4 (D.S.C. filed May 6, 2003 & entered May 7, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
M. P. No. 79-439.

#### Paul O. Boghossian, Jr. *et al. v.*White, Weld & Co., Incorporated *et al.*

Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.

*Abedon, Michael-son, Stanzler, Biener, Skolnik*6- *Lipsey, Julius C. Michael-son, Jeffrey J. Teitz,*for plaintiffs-respondents, *Hanson, Cur-ran ir Parks, William A. Curran, Robert D. Porrillo,*for defendants-petitioners.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Participation in High School Career and Technical Education and Postsecondary Enrollment      

# Report: Participation in High School Career and Technical Education and Postsecondary Enrollment

This report analyzes the relationship between high school career and technical education course-taking and later enrollment in postsecondary education. **Learn more.**
#### § 1217.4 Board foot.

*Board foot* or *BF* means a unit of measurement of softwood lumber represented by a board 12-inches long, 12-inches wide, and 1-inch thick or its cubic equivalent. A board foot calculation for softwood lumber 1 inch or more in thickness is based on its nominal thickness and width and the actual length. Softwood lumber with a nominal thickness of less than 1 inch is calculated as 1 inch.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: 5 Student Benefit Programs You Need to Check Out      

# Resource: 5 Student Benefit Programs You Need to Check Out

This article highlights five student programs to help college students succeed. Programs discussed include: 
                  -  Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA)  
                  -  Student Career Experience Program  
                  -  Federal Work-Study Program  
                  -  Fulbright Programs  
                  -  Federal Pell Grants  

**Learn more.**
#### Amber Furniture Company, appellee, v. Herman Lamm et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 33,676.

Opinion filed January 6, 1930.

Harry D. Knight, for appellants. Myer N. Rosengard, for appellee; Irving L. Block, of counsel.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 15, 2009 | /s/      Yale Farar                                                                             |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Yale      Farar, President(Principal      Executive Officer)                                    |
|                    |                                                                                            |
|                    |                                                                                            |
| Date:      May 15, 2009 | /s/      Mitchell W. Turk                                                                       |
|                    | Mitchell      W. Turk, Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                    |                                                                                            |

----