alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Data Call Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Timothy E. Vance, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Timothy E. Vance

Timothy E. VanceCEODated: August 14, 2009

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Data Call Technologies, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,143]


JL French Automotive Castings, LLC, Including On-Site Leased 
Workers From Labor Ready and Seek Staffing, Sheboygan, WI; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on November 4, 2009, applicable to workers of JL French Automotive 
Castings LLC, including on-site leased workers Labor Ready, Sheboygan, 
Wisconsin. The Department's Notice of determination was published in 
the Federal Register on January 25, 2010 (75 FR 3935).
    At the request of the state, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in activities related to the production of aluminum die cast parts.
    The company reports that workers leased from Seek Staffing, were 
employed on-site at the Sheboygan, Wisconsin location of JL French 
Automotive Castings LLC. The Department has determined that these 
workers were sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be 
considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Seek Staffing, working on-
site at the Sheboygan, Wisconsin location of JL French Automotive 
Castings LLC.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,143 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of JL French Automotive Castings LLC, including on-
site leased workers from Labor Ready and Seek Staffing, Sheboygan, 
Wisconsin, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after May 18, 2008, through November 4, 2011, and all workers 
in the group threatened with total or partial separation from 
employment on the date of certification through two years from the 
date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of August 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-28483 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit 31.1**I, Richard P. Buckanavage, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2006 of Patriot Capital Funding, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Datedthis 14th day of November, 2006.     By: /s/ Richard P. Buckanavage **Richard P. Buckanavage**    **Chief Executive Officer and President**
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brad W. Buss, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation for the year ended December 30, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cypress Semiconductor Corporation.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 1, 2013 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/ BRAD W. BUSS                                                                             
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Brad W. Buss Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial
Officer
SCWC-19-0000278

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII 

________________________________________________________________

SAMUEL B. SNIFFIN and SETH E. CONKLIN,

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Respondent/Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

MATTHEW MAZZOCCA,

Respondent/Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

(CIV. NO. 1CC131002943)

------------------------------------------------------------

SAMUEL B. SNIFFIN and SETH E. CONKLIN,

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

MATTHEW MAZZOCCA,

Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

(CIV. NO. 1CC141001193)

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-19-0000278)

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-19-0000278

15-NOV-2023

12:38 PM

Dkt. 12 ODAC
2

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna and Eddins, JJ., and Circuit 

Judges DeWeese and Drewyer, assigned by reason of vacancies)

Petitioners Samuel B. Sniffin and Seth E. Conklin’s 

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on October 2, 2023, is 

hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 15, 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Wendy M. DeWeese 

/s/ Michelle L. Drewyer
Exhibit 23.2



                     CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-37441) and related Prospectus of Freeport-
McMoRan Resource Partners, Limited Partnership of our report dated
January 15, 1997, with respect to the financial statements of IMC-
Agrico Company (not presented separately herein) included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.



                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                  ----------------------
                                                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Chicago, Illinois
March 28, 1997
ex102 (1)


Exhibit 10.2


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
REALOGY GROUP LLC PHANTOM VALUE PLAN (f/k/a REALOGY CORPORATION PHANTOM VALUE PLAN


Second Amendment to the Realogy Group LLC Phantom Value Plan (the “Second Amendment”).
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Realogy Corporation (n/k/a Realogy Group LLC) (the “Company”) adopted the Realogy Corporation Phantom Value Plan (k/n/a Realogy Group LLC Phantom Value Plan) (the “Plan”) on January 5, 2011 and the Plan was subsequently amended on November 28, 2011 (unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan);
WHEREAS, Section 14 of the Plan permits the Plan to be modified or amended in any respect by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Realogy Holdings Corp., the indirect, parent company of the Company(the “Committee”); and
WHEREAS, the Committee believes it is in the best interest of the Company to amend and restate Section 7 of the Plan to provide Participants with the opportunity to elect restricted stock units in addition to restricted stock.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of April 9, 2013:
		
	1.
	Section 7 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end of the section:


“Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the Participant elects to defer any payment under the Plan pursuant to the Company's deferred compensation plan as in effect from time to time, any unrestricted or restricted shares shall be delivered instead as unrestricted or restricted share units, as applicable.”
		
	2.
	The Plan, as hereby amended, remains in full force and effect.











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of the adoption of this Second Amendment, Realogy has caused the same to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 9th day of April 2013.


ATTEST:                            REALOGY GROUP LLC
/s/ Seth Truwit                            By:  /s/ David J. Weaving        
Name:    David J. Weaving                                        Title: Executive Vice President     
   and Chief Administrative Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1094 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1094

To amend the General Education Provisions Act to ensure that a student 
  is not required to submit to a survey, analysis, or evaluation that 
reveals personal information about such student or their family without 
                         prior written consent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 2023

   Mrs. Miller of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the General Education Provisions Act to ensure that a student 
  is not required to submit to a survey, analysis, or evaluation that 
reveals personal information about such student or their family without 
                         prior written consent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Parents Opt-in Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PUPILS' RIGHTS.

    Section 445 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 
1232h) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``prior consent of the student'' 
                and inserting ``prior written consent of the student''; 
                and
                    (B) by inserting before the period at the end the 
                following: ``, for such specific survey, analysis, or 
                evaluation''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(2)(A)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (i);
                    (B) in clause (ii), by striking ``subparagraph 
                (C).'' and inserting ``clause (i) or (iii) of 
                subparagraph (C); and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iii) not require a student to submit to 
                        a survey described in subparagraph (C)(ii) 
                        without the prior written consent of the 
                        student (if the student is an adult or 
                        emancipated minor), or in the case of an 
                        unemancipated minor, without the prior written 
                        consent of the parent, for such specific 
                        survey.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i.) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii.) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                             
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2007 |  | /s/ Dario Sacomani          
|                       |  | Dario Sacomani              
|                       |  | Executive Vice President and
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1679 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Expedited Funds Availability Act to clarify 

the application of that Act to American Samoa and the 

Northern Mariana Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1679 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF THE EXPEDITED FUNDS 

2 AVAILABILITY ACT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Expedited Funds Availability 

4 Act (12 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.) is amended— 

5 (1) in section 602(20) (12 U.S.C. 4001(20)) by 

6 inserting ‘‘, located in the United States,’’ after 

7 ‘‘ATM’’; 

8 (2) in section 602(21) (12 U.S.C. 4001(21)) by 

9 inserting ‘‘American Samoa, the Commonwealth of 

10 the Northern Mariana Islands,’’ after ‘‘Puerto 

11 Rico,’’; 

12 (3) in section 602(23) (12 U.S.C. 4001(23)) by 

13 inserting ‘‘American Samoa, the Commonwealth of 

14 the Northern Mariana Islands,’’ after ‘‘Puerto 

15 Rico,’’; and 

16 (4) in section 603(d)(2)(A) (12 U.S.C. 

17 4002(d)(2)(A)), by inserting ‘‘American Samoa, the 

18 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,’’ 

19 after ‘‘Puerto Rico,’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on 

21 January 1, 2016. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 9, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


dlhill on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
119 So.2d 846

#### Mrs. Ocie Murray SMITH v. John Lawrence SMITH.

No. 44172.

April 25, 1960.

Guy E. Humphries, Jr., Alexandria, for defendant-appellant.

Gold, Hall & Skye, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee.

VIOSCA, Justice.

Subsequent to the submission of this appeal, defendant-appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that he no longer desires to prosecute same. Plaintiff-appellee has joined in this motion and concurs therein.

Since both appellant and appellee have concurred in the motion to dismiss, the motion will be granted. Article 901 of the Code of Practice.

For the reasons assigned it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed.
#### § 1776.4 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1416.3 Eligible producer. ( a ) *Eligible producer* means, in addition to other requirements as may apply, an individual or legal entity who is an owner, operator, landlord, tenant, or sharecropper, who shares in the risk of producing a crop or livestock and who is entitled to share in the crop or livestock available for marketing from the farm, or would have shared had the crop or livestock been produced, and who also meets the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. The term eligible producer can include a livestock owner or contract grower who satisfies other requirements of this part.
( b ) An individual or legal entity seeking to be an eligible producer under this part must submit a farm operating plan in accordance with part 1400 of this chapter and be a: ( 1 ) Citizen of the United States;
( 2 ) Resident alien; for purposes of this part, resident alien means “lawful alien”;
( 3 ) Partnership of citizens of the United States;
( 4 ) Corporation, limited liability company, or other organizational structure organized under State law; or
( 5 ) Indian Tribe or Tribal organization, as defined in section 4(b) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5304).
[79 FR 21097, Apr. 14, 2014, as amended at 83 FR 49463, Oct. 2, 2018; 85 FR 10963, Feb. 26, 2020]
EXHIBIT
      32


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the annual Report of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Douglas Humphreys
      President/Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Grant Atkins,
      Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer/Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
                August 11, 2006
            
            
            Date:
                August 11, 2006/s/ Douglas
                Humphreys
            
            
            /s/ Grant
                AtkinsDouglas
                Humphreys
              President/Chief
                Executive Officer
            
            
            Grant
                Atkins
              Treasurer/Chief
                Financial Officer
#### McKIE, Tax Collector, Respondent, v. KELLOGG LAND CO. et al., Appellants (six cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 12, 1906.

Actions by John McICie, as tax collector, against the Kellogg Land Company, impleaded, etc., and five other cases against the same defendant.

No opinion. Interlocutory judgments affirmed, without costs, upon filing stipulations with leave to defendant the Kellogg Land Company to plead over within 20 days from entry of the judgment herein and service of a copy thereof with notice of entry.
§ 1220.616 General. An opportunity to request a referendum shall be provided to U.S. soybean producers to determine whether eligible producers favor the conduct of a referendum and the Request for Referendum shall be carried out in accordance with this subpart. ( a ) The opportunity to request a referendum shall be provided at the county FSA offices.
( b ) If the Secretary determines, based on results of the Request for Referendum that no less than 10 percent (not in excess of one-fifth of which may be producers in any one State) of all producers have requested a referendum on the Order, a referendum will be held within 1 year of that determination.
( c ) If the Secretary determines, based on the results of the Request for Referendum, that the requirements in paragraph (b) of this section are not met, a referendum will not be conducted.
( d ) For purposes of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the number of soybean producers in the United States will be determined by the Secretary using data provided by USDA.
[69 FR 13461, Mar. 23, 2004, as amended at 74 FR 9049, Mar. 2, 2009; 79 FR 12039, Mar. 4, 2014]