alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 23


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports included in this Form 10-K/A-2, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements File Nos. 033-21995,033-29317,033-62867, 033-62865, 
033-62877, 033-62879, 033-62881, 033-62883, 333-03643, 333-18477 and 333-21927.
    




/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


   
Baltimore, Maryland
 July 29, 1997
#### § 1488.20 Officials not to benefit.

No member of or delegate to Congress, or Resident Commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of the financing agreement or to any benefit that may arise therefrom, but this provision shall not be construed to extend to the financing agreement if made with a corporation for its general benefit.
#### McCarthy, Respondent, v. SUPREME COURT I. O. F., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 23, 1906.)

Action by Clista M. McCarthy, as, etc., against the Supreme Court of the Independent Order of Foresters.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 3, 2008
    By:
    /s/    Christian RagotChristian Ragot,President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 3, 2008
    By:
    /s/    Kevin P. BagbyKevin P. Bagby,Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
§ 1737.60 Telephone loan budget. ( a ) RUS shall prepare a “Telephone Loan Budget” (RUS Form 493) showing all costs for the proposed project and the amount of loan and nonloan funds to be used. The budget shall show, as applicable, amounts for central offices, outside plant and station equipment, right-of-way procurement, land, buildings, removal costs, special projects, engineering, vehicles and work equipment, office equipment, operating funds, refinancing with loan funds, debt retirement with nonloan funds, acquisitions, and contingencies. The amount of funds included in any loan shall be limited for certain items: ( 1 ) Operating funds for working capital or current operating deficiencies shall be included only in cases of financial hardship as determined by the Administrator.
( 2 ) Contingencies shall not exceed 3 percent of the total amount of loan funds to be used for construction, engineering, operating equipment and operating funds.
( b ) RUS shall prepare the cost estimates based on the data in RUS Form 494, “Loan Design Summary,” and RUS Form 495, “Construction Cost Estimates,” or their equivalents, and other parts of the LD submitted by the borrower, and on other pertinent information. See subpart D of this part. The amounts included in the proposed budget shall be the estimated costs, less the value of materials and supplies on hand or acquired that can be used in the proposed construction. The cost estimates in the LD may be adjusted by RUS in consultation with the borrower. See § 1737.50(c).
( c ) Generally, the new loan shall be reduced by any required equity funds and funds available in reserves no longer needed for prior loan purposes to determine the proposed loan requirement.
( d ) When amounts are available in reserves no longer needed for prior loan purposes, RUS may, at its option, deny further advances of these funds if they will be used to finance projects in the proposed loan.
( e ) The budget shall also show, if applicable, the reserves for each budget item as of the date of the latest RUS Form 481, “Financial Requirement Statement,” submitted by the borrower. To ensure that sufficient funds are included in the budget to finance all proposed construction, RUS includes in the budget any funds deposited by the borrower for approved interim financing.
[54 FR 13356, Apr. 3, 1989, as amended at 84 FR 59922, Nov. 7, 2019]
EXHIBIT 10.49

 

Steven C. Bierman

President

CNH Capital America, LLC

 

February 15, 2013

 

VIA ELECTRONIC AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

 

Titan Machinery, Inc.
 644 E. Beaton Dr.

West Fargo, ND 58078

Attn: Mr. David Meyer

 

Re: Confirmation of Extension of Credit

 

Dear Mr. Meyer:

 

This letter is to confirm that effective August 31, 2012, the term of the Amended and Restated Wholesale Floor Plan Credit Facility and Security Agreement, dated November 13, 2007 (the “Agreement”) by and between Titan Machinery, Inc. and CNH Capital America LLC was extended, in accordance with Section 2.03, for an additional twelve (12) month period and thereafter, will automatically renew for successive twelve month periods unless ninety (90) days’ prior written notice is given to the other party of the Agreement’s termination.

 

If you have any questions, please contact me at (262) 636-6105.

 

 

	
Sincerely,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Steven C. Bierman
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Steven   C. Bierman
    	
 
    
	
President
    	
 
    
	
CNH   Capital America, LLC
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Acknowledged:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Titan   Machinery, Inc.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:   
    	
/s/   David J. Meyer
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
David   J. Meyer
    	
Title: CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 170 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 170

 To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the 
 recording and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under 
            the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2013

   Mr. Gene Green of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise regulations concerning the 
 recording and reporting of occupational injuries and illnesses under 
            the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECORDING AND REPORTING OF OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND 
              ILLNESSES.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Labor shall revise the 
regulations in part 1904 of title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, 
concerning the recording and reporting of occupational injuries and 
illnesses under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 
U.S.C. 651 et seq.), to require site-controlling employers to keep a 
site log for all recordable injuries and illnesses occurring among all 
employees on the particular site, whether such employees are employed 
directly by the site-controlling employer or are employed by 
contractors or temporary help or employee leasing services.
    (b) Definition.--As used in this section, the term ``site-
controlling employer'' means the employer that has primary control over 
the work on a particular work site and supervises the employees on a 
day-to-day basis on a particular work site.
                                 <all>
```
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Paul Torres, * From the 106th District Court

of Gaines County,

Trial Court No. 10-4100.

Vs. No. 11-18-00330-CR * January 10, 2019

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consist Bailey, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance 

with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
| **Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Parenthetical) - $ / shares** | 12 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                 |            |   |   |
| Common Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Cash Paid                                    | $ 0.72          | $ 0.68 | $ 0.55 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends paid during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=27012166&loc=d3e187085-122770Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Section 04 -Article 3
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareCashPaid**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herbert L. Pollock, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Arnold, Appellant.

Two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, one rendered December 17, 1963 as to appellant Pollock and one rendered January 3, 1964 as to appellant Arnold, affirmed. No opinion. (See 26 A D 2d 684.) Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69460-69461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in schedule I or II, and prior to issuing a 
regulation under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2) authorizing the importation of 
such a substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the 
bulk manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice 
that on September 14, 2010, GE Healthcare, 3350 North Ridge Avenue, 
Arlington

[[Page 69461]]

Heights, Illinois 60004-1412, made application by renewal to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of 
Cocaine (9041), a basic class of controlled substance listed in 
schedule II.
    The company plans to import small quantities of ioflupane, in the 
form of three separate analogues of Cocaine, to validate production and 
quality control systems, for a reference standard, and for producing 
material for a future investigational new drug (IND) submission.
    Any bulk manufacturer who is presently, or is applying to be, 
registered with DEA to manufacture such basic class of controlled 
substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the 
proposed registration and may, at the same time, file a written request 
for a hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43 and in 
such form as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than December 13, 2010.
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with, and 
independent of, the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice published in the 
Federal Register on September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745-46), all 
applicants for registration to import a basic class of any controlled 
substance in schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to 
demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion 
Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for 
such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 
21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: November 1, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-28529 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 14, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (“ASME”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, since June 24, 2010, ASME has published five new standards, initiated seven new standards activities, and withdrawn three standards within the general nature and scope of ASME's standards development activities, as specified in its original notification. More detail regarding these changes can be found at                     *http://www.asme.org.*

                    On September 15, 2004, ASME filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 13, 2004 (69 FR 60895).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 28, 2010. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on August 2, 2010 (75 FR 45156).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-28560 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

# ACTION:

Notification of a New National Park, River Raisin National Battlefield Park.

# SUMMARY:

As authorized by Section 7003 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, Public Law 111-11 (codified at 16 U.S.C. 430vv), the National Park Service (NPS) announces the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) has designated acquired lands related to the Battles of River Raisin on January 18-22, 1813, as a unit of the National Park System to be known as the River Raisin National Battlefield Park.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 7003 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-11) includes specific provisions relating to establishment of this unit of the National Park System as follows:

a. If Monroe County or Wayne County, or other willing landowners in either county offer to donate to the United States lands relating to the Battles of River Raisin on January 18 and 22, 1813, or the aftermath of the battles, the Secretary of the Interior shall accept the donated land.

b. On the acquisition of land that is of sufficient acreage to permit efficient administration, the Secretary shall designate the acquired land as a unit of the National Park System to be known as the River Raisin National Battlefield Park.

The County of Monroe, the City of Monroe, and the Monroe County Port Authority donated land, including one improvement and the personal property therein, to the Federal Government on October 12, 2010, with a transfer of deeds. The Secretary has determined that the donation of these lands represents sufficient acreage to permit efficient management as a unit of the National Park System to be known as the River Raisin National Battlefield Park. This park is now a unit of the National Park System and subject to all laws, regulations and policy pertaining to such units.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nick Chevance, Midwest Regional Office, at (402) 661-1844.

Dated: October 26, 2010.

Daniel N. Wenk,

Deputy Director, Operations.

[FR Doc. 2010-28427 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1637 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1637

To amend the provisions of title 40, United States Code, commonly known 
    as the Davis-Bacon Act, to raise the threshold dollar amount of 
     contracts subject to the prevailing wage requirements of such 
                              provisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2013

Mr. Duncan of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Barton, Mrs. Blackburn, 
 Mr. Chabot, Mr. Flores, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. 
Pompeo, Mr. Yoder, Ms. Jenkins, and Mr. Amash) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the provisions of title 40, United States Code, commonly known 
    as the Davis-Bacon Act, to raise the threshold dollar amount of 
     contracts subject to the prevailing wage requirements of such 
                              provisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adjusting Davis-Bacon for Inflation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. THRESHOLD OF CONTRACTS SUBJECT TO DAVIS-BACON.

    Section 3142(a) of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code is 
amended by striking ``$2,000'' and inserting ``$50,000''.
                                 <all>
```