69716 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2010 / Notices 

2 Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting 

Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package 

Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August 

28, 2009 (Order No. 290). 

the instant contracts are functionally 

equivalent to previously submitted 

GEPS contracts, and are supported by 

Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, attached 

to the Notice and originally filed in 

Docket No. CP2008–4. Id. at 1, 

Attachment 3. The Notice explains that 

Order No. 86, which established GEPS 

1 as a product, also authorized 

functionally equivalent agreements to be 

included within the product, provided 

that they meet the requirements of 39 

U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No. 290, 

the Commission approved the GEPS 2 

product.2 In Order No. 503, the 

Commission approved the GEPS 3 

product. Additionally, the Postal 

Service requested to have the contract in 

Docket No. CP2010–71 serve as the 

baseline contract for future functional 

equivalence analyses of the GEPS 3 

product. 

The instant contracts. The Postal 

Service filed the instant contracts 

pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, 

the Postal Service contends that each 

contract is in accordance with Order No. 

86. The term of each contract is one year 

from the date the Postal Service notifies 

the customer that all necessary 

regulatory approvals have been 

received. Notice at 3. 

In support of its Notice, the Postal 

Service filed four attachments as 

follows: 

• Attachments 1A through 1E— 

redacted copies of the five contracts and 

applicable annexes; 

• Attachments 2A through 2E— 

certified statements required by 39 CFR 

3015.5(c)(2) for each contract; 

• Attachment 3—a redacted copy of 

Governors’ Decision No. 08–7 which 

establishes prices and classifications for 

GEPS contracts, a description of 

applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for 

prices, an analysis of the formulas, and 

certification of the Governors’ vote; and 

• Attachment 4—an application for 

non–public treatment of materials to 

maintain redacted portions of the 

contracts and supporting documents 

under seal. 

The Notice advances reasons why the 

instant GEPS 3 contracts fit within the 

Mail Classification Schedule language 

for the GEPS 3 product. The Postal 

Service identifies customer-specific 

information and general contract terms 

that distinguish the instant contracts 

from the baseline GEPS 3 agreement. Id. 

at 4–5. It states that the differences, 

which include price variations based on 

updated costing information and 

volume commitments, do not alter the 

contracts’ functional equivalency. Id. at 

3–4. The Postal Service asserts that 

‘‘[b]ecause the agreements incorporate 

the same cost attributes and 

methodology, the relevant 

characteristics of these five GEPS 

contracts are similar, if not the same, as 

the relevant characteristics of previously 

filed contracts.’’ Id. at 4. 

The Postal Service concludes that its 

filings demonstrate that each of the new 

GEPS 3 contracts complies with the 

requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is 

functionally equivalent to the baseline 

GEPS 3 contract. Therefore, it requests 

that the instant contracts be included 

within the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 5. 

II. Notice of Filing 

The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. CP2011–28 through CP2011–32 for 

consideration of matters related to the 

contracts identified in the Postal 

Service’s Notice. 

These dockets are addressed on a 

consolidated basis for purposes of this 

order. Filings with respect to a 

particular contract should be filed in 

that docket. 

Interested persons may submit 

comments on whether the Postal 

Service’s contracts are consistent with 

the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 

3642. Comments are due no later than 

November 16, 2010. The public portions 

of these filings can be accessed via the 

Commission’s Web site (http:// 

www.prc.gov). 

The Commission appoints Paul L. 

Harrington to serve as Public 

Representative in the captioned 

proceedings. 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

It is ordered: 

1. The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. CP2011–28 through CP2011–32 for 

consideration of matters raised by the 

Postal Service’s Notice. 

2. Comments by interested persons in 

these proceedings are due no later than 

November 16, 2010. 

3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. 

Harrington is appointed to serve as the 

officer of the Commission (Public 

Representative) to represent the 

interests of the general public in these 

dockets. 

4. The Secretary shall arrange for 

publication of this order in the Federal 

Register. 

By the Commission. 

Shoshana M. Grove, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28584 Filed 11–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD 

Agency Forms Submitted for OMB 

Review, Request for Comments 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. chapter 35), the Railroad 

Retirement Board (RRB) is forwarding 

an Information Collection Request (ICR) 

to the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) to 

request approval of a new information 

collection, consisting of proposed RRB 

Form G–252, Self-Employment/ 

Corporate Officer Work and Earnings 

Monitoring. Our ICR describes the 

information we seek to collect from the 

public. Completion is required to obtain 

or retain benefits. One response is 

required of each respondent. Review 

and approval by OIRA ensures that we 

impose appropriate paperwork burdens. 

The RRB invites comments on the 

proposed collection of information to 

determine (1) the practical utility of the 

collection; (2) the accuracy of the 

estimated burden of the collection; (3) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information that is the 

subject of collection; and (4) ways to 

minimize the burden of collections on 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Comments to RRB or OIRA must contain 

the OMB control number of the ICR. For 

proper consideration of your comments, 

it is best if RRB and OIRA receive them 

within 30 days of publication date. 

Previous Requests for Comments: The 

RRB has already published the initial 

60-day notice (75 FR 16876 on April 2, 

2010) required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). 

That request elicited no comments. 

Information Collection Request (ICR) 

Title: Self-Employment/Corporate 

Officer Work and Earnings Monitoring. 

OMB Control Number: 3220–XXXX. 

Form(s) submitted: G–252. 

Type of request: New information 

collection. 

Affected public: Individuals or 

households. 

Abstract: To determine entitlement or 

continued entitlement to a disability 

annuity, the RRB will obtain 

information from disability annuitants 

who claim to be self-employed or a 

corporate officer or who the RRB 

determines to be self-employed or a 

corporate officer after a continuing 

disability review. 

Changes Proposed: N.A. 

The burden estimate for the ICR is as 

follows: 

Estimated annual number of 

respondents: 100. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2010 / Notices 69717 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3Changes are marked to the rule text that appears 

in the electronic Nasdaq Manual found at http:// 

nasdaqomx.cchwallstreet.com. 

Total annual responses: 100. 

Total annual reporting hours: 33. 

Additional Information or Comments: 

Copies of the forms and supporting 

documents can be obtained from 

Charles Mierzwa, the agency clearance 

officer (312–751–3363) or 

Charles.Mierzwa@rrb.gov. 

Comments regarding the information 

collection should be addressed to 

Patricia Henaghan, Railroad Retirement 

Board, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, 

Illinois 60611–2092 or 

Patricia.Henaghan@rrb.gov and to the 

OMB Desk Officer for the RRB, at the 

Office of Management and Budget, 

Room 10230, New Executive Office 

Building, Washington, DC 20503. 

Charles Mierzwa, 

Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28600 Filed 11–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7905–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[File No. 500–1] 

In the Matter of: Edentify, Inc., Embryo 

Development Corp., Enclaves Group, 

Inc., Energytec, Inc., Enesco Group, 

Inc., Entertainment Is Us, Inc., Entrada 

Networks, Inc., Entropin, Inc., Epic 

Financial Corp., Epicus 

Communications Group, Inc., Epixtar 

Corp., Equisure, Inc., Equus Gaming 

Co., and Evans, Inc. (n/k/a Fur 

Company A), Order of Suspension of 

Trading 

November 10, 2010. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Edentify, 

Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 

reports since the period ended 

September 30, 2007. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Embryo 

Development Corp. because it has not 

filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended July 31, 2006. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Enclaves 

Group, Inc. because it has not filed any 

periodic reports since the period ended 

September 30, 2006. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Energytec, 

Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 

reports since the period ended 

September 30, 2007. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Enesco 

Group, Inc. because it has not filed any 

periodic reports since the period ended 

September 30, 2006. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of 

Entertainment Is Us, Inc. because it has 

not filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended June 30, 2006. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Entrada 

Networks, Inc. because it has not filed 

any periodic reports since the period 

ended April 30, 2005. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Entropin, 

Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 

reports since the period ended 

September 30, 2006. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Epic 

Financial Corp. because it has not filed 

any periodic reports since the period 

ended July 31, 2005. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Epicus 

Communications Group, Inc. because it 

has not filed any periodic reports since 

the period ended November 30, 2007. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Epixtar 

Corp. because it has not filed any 

periodic reports since the period ended 

June 30, 2005. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Equisure, 

Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 

reports since the period ended 

September 30, 1997. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Equus 

Gaming Co. because it has not filed any 

periodic reports since the fiscal year 

ended December 31, 2002. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Evans, Inc. 

(n/k/a Fur Company A) because it has 

not filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended November 28, 1998. 

The Commission is of the opinion that 

the public interest and the protection of 

investors require a suspension of trading 

in the securities of the above-listed 

companies. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to 

Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934, that trading in the 

securities of the above-listed companies 

is suspended for the period from 9:30 

a.m. EST on November 10, 2010, 

through 11:59 p.m. EST on November 

23, 2010. 

By the Commission. 

Jill M. Peterson, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28775 Filed 11–10–10; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–63276; File No. SR– 

NASDAQ–2010–138] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The 

NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of 

Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of 

a Proposed Rule Change To Establish 

a Program for Managed Data Solutions 

November 8, 2010. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’) 1, and Rule 19b–4 thereunder, 2

notice is hereby given that on October 

25, 2010, The NASDAQ Stock Market 

LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with 

the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) 

the proposed rule change as described 

in Items I, II, and III below, which Items 

have been prepared by Nasdaq. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of the Substance 

of the Proposed Rule Change 

Nasdaq proposes to establish a 

program for Managed Data Solutions. 

The text of the proposed rule change 

is below. Proposed new language is 

italicized; proposed deletions are in 

[brackets].3

* * * * * 

7026. Distribution Models [Reserved] 

(a) Reserved 

(b) Managed Data Solutions 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES