##### Table of Contents

---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

Form 10-Q



---

(Mark One)

|x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the quarterly period ended July 2, 2006

OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from  to

Commission File Number 000-51666



---

SPANSION INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 20-3898239                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



|                                         |  |           
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------
|915 DeGuigne Drive Sunnyvale, California |  | 94088     
|(Address of principal executive offices) |  | (Zip Code)

Registrants telephone number, including area code: (408) 962-2500



---

Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ̈Accelerated
filer ̈Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).    Yes ̈No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock as of the close of business on August 7, 2006:



|                                       |  |                 
|-------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|Class                                  |  | Number of Shares
|Class A Common Stock, $0.001 par value |  | 96,483,488      
|Class B Common Stock, $0.001 par value |  | 1               
|Class C Common Stock, $0.001 par value |  | 1               
|Class D Common Stock, $0.001 par value |  | 32,352,934      



---



---

##### Table of Contents

INDEX



|          |  |                       |  |                                                                                                                         |  |         
|--------- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------
|          |  |                       |  |                                                                                                                         |  | Page No.
|Part I.   |  | Financial Information |  |                                                                                                                        
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  | Item 1.               |  | Financial Statements                                                                                                    |  | 3       
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  |                       |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)  Three and Six Months Ended July 2, 2006 and June 26, 2005 |  | 3       
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  |                       |  | Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets  July 2, 2006 (Unaudited) and December 25, 2005                                  |  | 4       
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  |                       |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)  Six Months Ended July 2, 2006 and June 26, 2005           |  | 5       
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  |                       |  | Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)                                                        |  | 6       
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  | Item 2.               |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                                   |  | 21      
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  | Item 3.               |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                                                              |  | 32      
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  | Item 4.               |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                                 |  | 32      
|          |  |                      
|Part II.  |  | Other Information     |  |                                                                                                                        
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  | Item 1.               |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                                                       |  | 33      
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  | Item 1A.              |  | Risk Factors                                                                                                            |  | 34      
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  | Item 4.               |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                                     |  | 56      
|          |  |                       | 
|          |  | Item 6.               |  | Exhibits                                                                                                                |  | 57      
|          | 
|Signature |  | 58                   



2



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Spansion Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)



|                                                                                                                              |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |          |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ------- | - | ---------------- | - | ------- | ------------ |  | - | ------------ | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                                                                                                                              |  | Three Months Ended |         |   | Six Months Ended |  
|                                                                                                                              |  | Jul. 2,2006        |         |   | Jun. 26,2005     |   |         | Jul. 2, 2006 |  |   | Jun. 26,2005 |  
|Net sales                                                                                                                     |  | $                  | 396,735 |   |                  | $ |        |              |  | $ | 396,735      |   |  | $ |         |  
|Net sales to related parties/members (Note 6)                                                                                 |  |                    | 258,617 |   |                  |   | 462,367 |              |  |   | 820,546      |   |  |   | 895,556  |  
|                                                                                                                              |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |          |  
|Total net sales                                                                                                               |  |                    | 655,352 |   |                  |   | 462,367 |              |  |   | 1,217,281    |   |  |   | 895,556  |  
|                                                                                                                              |  |                    |         |  
|Expenses:                                                                                                                     |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |          |  
|Cost of sales (including $55,782, $61,878, $113,323 and $122,570 of expenses to related parties/members)                      |  |                    | 523,295 |   |                  |   | 430,477 |              |  |   | 976,285      |   |  |   | 867,163  |  
|Research and development (including $4,265, $10,507, $8,677 and $20,795 of expenses to related parties/members)               |  |                    | 91,800  |   |                  |   | 74,597  |              |  |   | 176,358      |   |  |   | 145,976  |  
|Marketing, general and administrative (including $7,187, $18,571, $17,457 and $37,479 of expenses to related
parties/members) |  |                    | 67,305  |   |                  |   | 45,426  |              |  |   | 129,724      |   |  |   | 81,525   |  
|                                                                                                                              |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |          |  
|Operating loss                                                                                                                |  |                    | (27,048 | ) |                  |   | (88,133 | )            |  |   | (65,086      | ) |  |   | (199,108 | )
|                                                                                                                              |  |                    |         |  
|Other income (expense):                                                                                                       |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |          |  
|Gain on sale of marketable securities                                                                                         |  |                    | 6,884   |   |                  |   |        |              |  |   | 6,884        |   |  |   |         |  
|Loss on early extinguishment of debt (Note 8)                                                                                 |  |                    | (17,310 | ) |                  |   |        |              |  |   | (17,310      | ) |  |   |         |  
|Interest income and other, net                                                                                                |  |                    | 4,300   |   |                  |   | 779     |              |  |   | 10,279       |   |  |   | 2,064    |  
|Interest expense (including $5,281, $6,561, $11,729 and $12,911 of expenses to related parties/members)                       |  |                    | (18,391 | ) |                  |   | (11,076 | )            |  |   | (37,185      | ) |  |   | (22,211  | )
|                                                                                                                              |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |          |  
|Other expense, net                                                                                                            |  |                    | (24,517 | ) |                  |   | (10,297 | )            |  |   | (37,332      | ) |  |   | (20,147  | )
|                                                                                                                              |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |          |  
|Loss before income taxes                                                                                                      |  |                    | (51,565 | ) |                  |   | (98,430 | )            |  |   | (102,418     | ) |  |   | (219,255 | )
|Benefit for income taxes                                                                                                      |  |                    | (2,806  | ) |                  |   | (12,406 | )            |  |   | (1,782       | ) |  |   | (24,389  | )
|                                                                                                                              |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |          |  
|Net loss                                                                                                                      |  | $                  | (48,759 | ) |                  | $ | (86,024 | )            |  | $ | (100,636     | ) |  | $ | (194,866 | )
|                                                                                                                              |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |          |  
|Net loss per common share:                                                                                                    |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |          |  
|                                                                                                                              |  |                    |         |  
|Basic and diluted                                                                                                             |  | $                  | (0.38   | ) |                  | $ | (1.19   | )            |  | $ | (0.78        | ) |  | $ | (2.69    | )
|                                                                                                                              |  |                    |         |  
|Shares used in per share calculation:                                                                                         |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |          |  
|Basic and diluted                                                                                                             |  |                    | 128,464 |   |                  |   | 72,549  |              |  |   | 128,311      |   |  |   | 72,549   |  

See accompanying notes

Net loss for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 included stock-based compensation expense of $6.4 million and $14.2 million, respectively, which consisted of $4.3 million and $10.5 million related to the
Companys stock options and restricted stock units, and $2.1 million and $3.7 million related to AMD stock options granted to the Companys employees. The Company did not provide stock-based compensation to its employees or third parties
and there was no stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005.

As a result of adopting FASB Statement
No. 123(R) on December 26, 2005, the Companys loss before income taxes and net loss for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 were $844,000 and $1.7 million higher, respectively, than if it had continued to account for its
stock options under APB Opinion 25. Basic and diluted loss per share for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 were $0.01 higher than if the Company had continued to account for its stock options under Opinion 25. See Notes 2 and 3
to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands)



|                                                                        |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | --------- | ----------------- | - | ---------
|                                                                        |  | Jul. 2, 2006 (Unaudited) |           | Dec. 25, 2005 (*)
|Assets                                                                  |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|                                                                        |  |                         
|Current assets:                                                         |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|Cash and cash equivalents                                               |  | $                        | 354,531   |                   | $ | 506,439  
|Marketable securities                                                   |  |                          | 9,862     |                   |   | 219,377  
|Trade accounts receivable, net                                          |  |                          | 195,035   |                   |   |         
|Trade accounts receivable from related parties, net (Note 6)            |  |                          | 246,214   |                   |   | 404,575  
|Other receivables from related parties                                  |  |                          | 1,861     |                   |   | 14,067   
|Inventories:                                                            |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|Raw materials                                                           |  |                          | 40,967    |                   |   | 31,299   
|Work-in-progress                                                        |  |                          | 362,240   |                   |   | 354,748  
|Finished goods                                                          |  |                          | 82,863    |                   |   | 74,096   
|                                                                        |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|Total inventories                                                       |  |                          | 486,070   |                   |   | 460,143  
|Deferred income taxes                                                   |  |                          | 6,857     |                   |   | 34,452   
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets                               |  |                          | 48,784    |                   |   | 33,789   
|                                                                        |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|Total current assets                                                    |  |                          | 1,349,214 |                   |   | 1,672,842
|                                                                        |  |                         
|Property, plant and equipment, net                                      |  |                          | 1,604,172 |                   |   | 1,587,763
|Deferred income taxes                                                   |  |                          | 7,793     |                   |   | 7,128    
|Other assets                                                            |  |                          | 32,048    |                   |   | 34,232   
|                                                                        |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|Total assets                                                            |  | $                        | 2,993,227 |                   | $ | 3,301,965
|                                                                        |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|Liabilities and Stockholders Equity                                    |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|                                                                        |  |                         
|Current liabilities:                                                    |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|Notes payable to banks under revolving loans                            |  | $                        | 8,739     |                   | $ | 43,020   
|Accounts payable                                                        |  |                          | 326,909   |                   |   | 280,057  
|Accounts payable to related parties (Note 6)                            |  |                          | 21,871    |                   |   | 123,801  
|Accrued compensation and benefits                                       |  |                          | 47,161    |                   |   | 51,534   
|Accrued liabilities to related parties (Note 6)                         |  |                          | 16,763    |                   |   | 21,470   
|Other accrued liabilities                                               |  |                          | 55,666    |                   |   | 35,564   
|Income taxes payable                                                    |  |                          | 2,757     |                   |   | 13,058   
|Deferred income on shipments to a related party                         |  |                          | 409       |                   |   | 31,901   
|Deferred income on shipments                                            |  |                          | 27,306    |                   |   |         
|Current portion of long-term obligations to related parties (Note 8)    |  |                          | 1,500     |                   |   | 21,638   
|Current portion of long-term debt                                       |  |                          | 30,476    |                   |   | 60,021   
|Current portion of long-term obligations under capital leases           |  |                          | 76,886    |                   |   | 108,876  
|                                                                        |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|Total current liabilities                                               |  |                          | 616,443   |                   |   | 790,940  
|                                                                        |  |                         
|Deferred income taxes                                                   |  |                          | 4,031     |                   |   | 29,498   
|Long-term accrued liabilities to a related party (Note 3)               |  |                          | 6,663     |                   |   | 8,732    
|Long-term obligations to related parties, less current portion (Note 8) |  |                          |          |                   |   | 162,277  
|Long-term debt, less current portion                                    |  |                          | 441,403   |                   |   | 256,762  
|Long-term obligations under capital leases, less current portion        |  |                          | 60,373    |                   |   | 107,019  
|Other long-term liabilities                                             |  |                          | 18,348    |                   |   | 24,760   
|                                                                        |  |                         
|Commitments and contingencies                                           |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|                                                                        |  |                         
|Stockholders equity                                                    |  |                          | 1,845,966 |                   |   | 1,921,977
|                                                                        |  |                          |           |                   |   |          
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity                              |  | $                        | 2,993,227 |                   | $ | 3,301,965
|                                                                        |  |                          |           |                   |   |          

---

|* | Derived from audited financial statements at December 25, 2005.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

See accompanying notes



4



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)



|                                                                                           |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------- | -------- | - | ------------ | - | -------- | -
|                                                                                           |  | Six Months Ended |         
|                                                                                           |  | Jul. 2, 2006     |          |   | Jun. 26,2005 |  
|Cash Flows from Operating Activities:                                                      |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|Net loss                                                                                   |  | $                | (100,636 | ) |              | $ | (194,866 | )
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:            |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                              |  |                  | 272,429  |   |              |   | 281,283  |  
|Loss on early extinguishment of debt                                                       |  |                  | 17,310   |   |              |   |         |  
|(Decrease) Increase in provision for doubtful accounts                                     |  |                  | (312     | ) |              |   | 262      |  
|Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes                                              |  |                  | 1,463    |   |              |   | (22,119  | )
|Gain on sale and disposal of property, plant, and equipment                                |  |                  | (465     | ) |              |   | (803     | )
|Gain on sale of marketable securities                                                      |  |                  | (6,884   | ) |              |   |         |  
|Compensation recognized under employee stock plans                                         |  |                  | 14,231   |   |              |   |         |  
|Amortization on senior subordinated notes and senior notes discounts                       |  |                  | 1,960    |   |              |   |         |  
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                                               |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|Decrease in trade accounts receivable from related parties/members                         |  |                  | 159,262  |   |              |   | 32,985   |  
|Decrease (increase) in other receivables from related parties/members                      |  |                  | 12,207   |   |              |   | (7,536   | )
|Increase in trade accounts receivable                                                      |  |                  | (195,624 | ) |              |   |         |  
|(Increase) decrease in inventories                                                         |  |                  | (25,925  | ) |              |   | 10,448   |  
|Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets                                      |  |                  | (14,995  | ) |              |   | (4,816   | )
|Decrease in other assets                                                                   |  |                  | 189      |   |              |   | 578      |  
|(Decrease) Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities to related parties/members |  |                  | (102,715 | ) |              |   | 42,407   |  
|Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities                            |  |                  | 66,043   |   |              |   | (23,421  | )
|Decrease in accrued compensation and benefits                                              |  |                  | (9,992   | ) |              |   | (3,250   | )
|Decrease in income taxes payable                                                           |  |                  | (10,301  | ) |              |   | (19,996  | )
|Decrease in deferred income on shipments to a related party/member                         |  |                  | (31,492  | ) |              |   | (6,958   | )
|Increase in deferred income on shipments                                                   |  |                  | 27,306   |   |              |   |         |  
|                                                                                           |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                                  |  |                  | 73,059   |   |              |   | 84,198   |  
|                                                                                           |  |                 
|Cash Flows from Investing Activities:                                                      |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment                                        |  |                  | 2,298    |   |              |   | 696      |  
|Purchases of property, plant and equipment                                                 |  |                  | (290,940 | ) |              |   | (139,302 | )
|Proceeds from maturity and sale of marketable securities                                   |  |                  | 272,721  |   |              |   | 28,550   |  
|Purchases of marketable securities                                                         |  |                  | (63,612  | ) |              |   | (10,000  | )
|                                                                                           |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                                      |  |                  | (79,533  | ) |              |   | (120,056 | )
|                                                                                           |  |                 
|Cash Flows from Financing Activities:                                                      |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|Cash contributions from related parties/members                                            |  |                  |         |   |              |   | 3,750    |  
|Cash distribution to related parties for stock-based compensation                          |  |                  | (5,991   | ) |              |   | (869     | )
|Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions                                                  |  |                  |         |   |              |   | 78,098   |  
|Proceeds from borrowings, net of issuance costs                                            |  |                  | 320,373  |   |              |   | 50,528   |  
|Payments on loans from related parties/members                                             |  |                  | (196,619 | ) |              |   | (4,510   | )
|Payments on debt and capital lease obligations                                             |  |                  | (280,004 | ) |              |   | (99,053  | )
|                                                                                           |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities                                        |  |                  | (162,241 | ) |              |   | 27,944   |  
|                                                                                           |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents                               |  |                  | 16,807   |   |              |   | 1,121    |  
|                                                                                           |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents                                                  |  |                  | (151,908 | ) |              |   | (6,793   | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period                                       |  |                  | 506,439  |   |              |   | 138,188  |  
|                                                                                           |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                                                 |  | $                | 354,531  |   |              | $ | 131,395  |  
|                                                                                           |  |                  |          |   |              |   |          |  

See accompanying notes



5



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Description of Business

Spansion Inc. (the Company) is a semiconductor manufacturer headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, with manufacturing, research and
development and assembly operations in the United States, Asia and Europe. The Company is dedicated exclusively to developing, designing, manufacturing and selling Flash memory, a critical semiconductor component of many electronic products.

The Companys Flash memory devices, marketed under the Spansion® and MirrorBit® global brand names, are incorporated into a broad range of electronic products, including mobile phones, consumer electronics, automotive electronics,
networking and telecommunications equipment, PC and PC peripheral applications.

Spansion LLC, the former joint venture 60 percent owned by
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and 40 percent owned by Fujitsu Limited (Fujitsu), was reorganized into Spansion Inc. in 2005. Spansion Inc. is the holding company that completed its underwritten initial public offering (IPO) of Class A
common stock on December 21, 2005 and Spansion LLC is its wholly owned operating subsidiary.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X. The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are unaudited. In the opinion of management, these financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) that are necessary
for a fair statement of the Companys operating results, financial position and cash flows. Operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any subsequent interim period
or for the year ending December 31, 2006.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include all the accounts of the Company and
those of its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The condensed consolidated
financial statements do not include certain financial footnotes and disclosures required under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for audited financial statements. Therefore, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 25, 2005 included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 15, 2006.

The Company uses a 52- to 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday in December. The
three months ended July 2, 2006 and June 26, 2005 consisted of 14 weeks and 13 weeks, respectively. The six months ended July 2, 2006 and June 26, 2005 consisted of 27 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively. The second quarter of
fiscal 2006 consisted of one week more than a typical quarter.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial
statements and disclosures in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of commitments and contingencies
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements.

Financial Statements Reclassifications

Certain prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Stock-Based Compensation

Treatment of AMD Stock Options

Prior to the IPO, the
Company did not provide stock-based compensation to its employees or third parties. Subsequent to June 30, 2003, however, certain of the Companys employees received stock options to purchase shares of AMD common stock from the
Companys then majority member, AMD. The Company accounted for AMDs stock option grants and restricted stock unit, or RSU, awards to its employees under the intrinsic value recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations, consistent with the accounting method followed by AMD for stock options and RSU awards issued to employees of the consolidated AMD group.
The exercise price of these stock options was equal to the market price of AMDs common stock on the date of grant. The Company reimbursed AMD for these stock options based on an agreed amount equal to the grant-date fair value of the stock
options calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, less a 15 percent discount (the grant date fair value). The Company recorded a liability for amounts due to AMD under this arrangement with a corresponding reduction to
additional paid-in capital. Reimbursements to AMD are payable in sixteen equal quarterly installments which commence on the last day of the quarter following the quarter in which the stock options were granted.

Subsequent to the Companys IPO, these awards are being accounted for under variable fair value accounting following the guidance in Emerging Issues
Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Good or Services, and EITF Issue No. 00-12, Accounting by an Investor
for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employee of an Equity Method Investee, and will continue to be remeasured to their fair value in future periods until they are fully vested.

Spansion Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plans

Effective December 26, 2005, the Company
adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which requires a public entity to reflect on its income statement, instead of pro forma disclosures in its financial footnotes,
the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Statement 123(R) supersedes the Companys previous accounting under Opinion 25 for periods beginning in
fiscal 2006.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

The Company adopted Statement 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard as of
December 26, 2005, the first day of the Companys fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 reflect the impact
of Statement 123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective transition method, the Companys consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect, and do not include, the impact of Statement 123(R).

In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 regarding the SECs interpretation of Statement 123(R) and
the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. The Company applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of Statement 123(R).

The Company estimated the fair value of its stock-based awards to employees using Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. Stock-based compensation expense recognized during a period is based on the higher of the grant date fair value of
the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest, or actually vest, during the period. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Companys condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and
six months ended July 2, 2006 included compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 25, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the pro forma
provisions of Statement 123 and compensation expense for the share-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 25, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of Statement 123(R). Compensation
expense for all share-based payment awards was recognized using the straight-line attribution method reduced for estimated forfeitures. The Company does not have sufficient historical forfeiture experience related to its own stock-based awards.
Therefore, the Company estimated forfeitures based on AMDs historical forfeiture rates, as the Company believes these forfeiture rates to be the most indicative of its own expected forfeiture rate. Statement 123(R) requires forfeitures to be
estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. In the Companys pro forma information for the periods prior to fiscal 2006, the Company accounted for
forfeitures as they occurred.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the FASB ratified EITF No. 06-2 Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43, Accounting for Compensated Absences. EITF 06-2 provides
guidelines under which sabbatical leave or other similar benefits provided to an employee are considered to accumulate, as defined in FASB Statement 43. If such benefits are deemed to accumulate, then the compensation cost associated with a
sabbatical or other similar benefit arrangement should be accrued over the requisite service period. The provisions of this Issue are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and allow for either retrospective application or
a cumulative effect adjustment to accumulated deficit approach upon adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this Issue will have on its financial statements.

In July 2006, FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109. This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. It prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and



8



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosures. It will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The provisions of this
interpretation apply to all tax positions upon initial adoption of this interpretation. Only tax positions that meet the recognition threshold criteria at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized upon adoption of this
interpretation. The cumulative effect applying the provisions of this interpretation will be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the accounting and disclosure requirements
of this interpretation and expects to adopt it as required at the beginning of its fiscal year ending December 30, 2007.

3. Stock-Based
Compensation

AMD Stock Options

The
Company paid AMD approximately $6.0 million and $0.9 million for stock options during the six months ended July 2, 2006 and June 26, 2005. The Companys outstanding liability to AMD for stock option reimbursements as of July 2,
2006 was approximately $11.7 million, of which $6.7 million is due beyond the next twelve-month period. The Companys outstanding liability to AMD for stock option reimbursements as of December 25, 2005 was approximately $17.1 million, of
which $8.7 million is due beyond the next twelve-month period.

As of July 2, 2006, there were approximately 636,000 unvested AMD
stock options and RSU awards that were still held by the Companys employees, which are currently subject to variable fair value accounting. As of July 2, 2006, the total fair value of these stock options, based on a Black-Scholes-Merton
option pricing model, and restricted stock unit awards was approximately $12.2 million. These stock options and RSU awards will generally vest through 2009 and, as a result, will continue to result in remeasured compensation expense each interim and
annual reporting period until they are fully vested. Pro forma stock-based compensation expense in accordance with FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, related to AMD stock options granted to the
Companys employees was $1.3 million and $2.3 million for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005.

Spansion Stock-Based Incentive
Compensation Plans

Plan Description

As of July 2, 2006, the Company had one stock-based incentive plan, the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, under which 9,500,000 shares of Class A common stock have been reserved and made available for issuance in the form of equity
awards, including incentive and nonqualified stock options and RSU awards. The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors, and that committee has the authority to, among other
things, grant awards, delegate certain of its powers, accelerate or extend the vesting or exercisability of awards and determine the date of grant of an award. Shares that are subject to or underlie awards that expire or for any reason are
cancelled, terminated or forfeited, or fail to vest will again be available for grant under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. The maximum term of the stock options will be 10 years from the date of grant and the exercise price of each option will be
determined under the applicable terms and conditions as approved by the Compensation Committee.

The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan provides
awards that may be granted to an officer or employee, a consultant or advisor, or a non-employee director of the Company or its subsidiaries; provided that, the incentive stock options granted under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan may only be granted
to employees



9



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

of the Company or its subsidiaries. The exercise price of each incentive stock option will be required to be not less than 100 percent of the fair market value of our
Class A common stock on the date of grant (not less than 110 percent if such stock options are granted to persons who have more than 10 percent of the total voting power of all classes of our stock).

Stock options generally vest ratably over a period of four years and expire if not exercised by the seventh anniversary of the grant date. RSU awards
have no exercise price or expiration date. RSU awards generally vest over a four-year period, except for awards of 2.3 million shares granted on the date of the Companys IPO (December 15, 2005), which vested 25 percent on April 28,
2006 and the remainder in equal installments quarterly over the remaining 36 months.

Valuation and Expense Information

The following table sets forth the total recorded stock-based compensation expense, by financial statement caption, resulting from the Companys
stock options and RSU awards under Statement 123(R) for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006:



|                                                                               |  |                                |       |                              |   |       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------ | ----- | ---------------------------- | - | ------
|                                                                               |  | Three MonthsEnded July 2,
2006 |       | Six MonthsEnded July 2, 2006
|                                                                               |  | (in thousands)                
|Cost of sales                                                                  |  | $                              | 2,139 |                              | $ | 5,254 
|Research and development                                                       |  |                                | 1,070 |                              |   | 2,629 
|Marketing, general and administrative                                          |  |                                | 1,070 |                              |   | 2,629 
|                                                                               |  |                                |       |                              |   |       
|Stock-based compensation expense under Statement 123(R) before income taxes(1) |  |                                | 4,279 |                              |   | 10,512
|                                                                               |  |                                |       |                              |   |       
|Income tax benefit                                                             |  |                                |      |                              |   |      
|                                                                               |  |                                |       |                              |   |       
|Stock-based compensation expense under Statement 123(R) after income taxes(1)  |  | $                              | 4,279 |                              | $ | 10,512
|                                                                               |  |                                |       |                              |   |       

---

|(1) | Stock-based compensation expense under Statement 123(R) does not include the compensation expense of AMD stock options and AMD RSU awards granted to the
Companys employees, which were accounted for under EITF Issue Nos. 96-18 and 00-12, and which will continue to be remeasured to their fair value in future periods until they are fully vested. The compensation expense of these awards was
approximately $2.1 million and $3.7 million for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006, respectively.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The weighted
average fair value of the Companys stock options granted in the three and six months ended July 2, 2006, was $7.48 and $7.84 per share, respectively. The fair value of each stock option was estimated at the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, with the following assumptions for grants in the three and six months ended July 2, 2006:



|                         |  |                                 |   |  |                               |  
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------- | - |  | ----------------------------- | -
|                         |  | Three Months Ended July 2, 2006 |   |  | Six Months Ended July 2, 2006 |  
|Expected volatility      |  | 55.92                           | % |  | 59.97                         | %
|Risk-free interest rate  |  | 5.10                            | % |  | 4.89                          | %
|Expected term (in years) |  | 4.61                            |   |  | 4.59                          |  
|Dividend yield           |  | 0                               | % |  | 0                             | %



10



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

The Companys dividend yield is zero because the Company has never paid dividends and does not have plans to do so over the expected life of the
options. The expected volatility is based on the Companys recent historical volatility and the volatilities of the Companys competitors who are in the same industry sector with similar characteristics (guideline companies)
given the lack of historical realized volatility data of the Company. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield from U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bond with a remaining term equal to the expected stock option life. The expected term is based on
the shortcut approach provided in SAB 107 for developing the estimate of the expected life of a plain vanilla stock option. Under this approach, the expected term is presumed to be the mid-point between the average vesting
date and the end of the contractual term.

As of July 2, 2006, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock
options and RSU awards was approximately $42.7 million after reduction for estimated forfeitures, and such stock options and RSU awards will generally vest ratably through 2010.

Stock Option and Restricted Stock Unit Activity

The following table summarizes stock option activity
and related information for the period presented:



|                                            |  |                               |   |  |                               |       |                                                     |      |                         |   |          
|------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | - |  | ----------------------------- | ----- | --------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ----------------------- | - | ---------
|                                            |  | Six Months Ended July 2, 2006
|                                            |  | Number ofShares               |   |  | Weighted-AverageExercisePrice |       | Weighted-AverageRemainingContractualLife (in Years) |      | AggregateIntrinsicValue
|Options:                                    |  |                               |   |  |                               |       |                                                     |      |                        
|Outstanding at the beginning of fiscal 2006 |  | 1,949,750                     |   |  | $                             | 12.00 |                                                     |      |                         |   |          
|Granted                                     |  | 262,500                       |   |  | $                             | 14.64 |                                                     |      |                         |   |          
|Canceled                                    |  | (152,344                      | ) |  | $                             | 12.00 |                                                     |      |                         |   |          
|                                            |  |                               |   |  |                               |       |                                                     |      |                         |   |          
|Outstanding as of July 2, 2006              |  | 2,059,906                     |   |  | $                             | 12.34 |                                                     | 6.50 |                         | $ | 7,415,662
|                                            |  |                               |   |  |                               |       |                                                     |      |                         |   |          
|Exercisable as of July 2, 2006(1)           |  | 35,156                        |   |  | $                             | 12.00 |                                                     | 6.45 |                         | $ | 138,515  

---

|(1) | There were 35,156 shares vested during the six months ended July 2, 2006, with a total fair value of approximately $241,000.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



11



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pretax intrinsic value, based on the Companys closing stock price of
$15.94 as of July 2, 2006, which would have been received by the stock option holders had all stock option holders exercised their stock options as of that date.

The following table summarizes RSU award activity and related information for the period presented:



|                                              |  |                               |   |  |                                         |      
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | - |  | --------------------------------------- | -----
|                                              |  | Six Months Ended July 2, 2006
|                                              |  | Number ofShares               |   |  | Weighted- Average Grant-date Fair Value
|Restricted Stock Units:                       |  |                               |   |  |                                        
|Unvested at the beginning of fiscal year 2006 |  | 3,604,090                     |   |  | $                                       | 12.00
|Granted                                       |  | 95,647                        |   |  | $                                       | 14.88
|Canceled                                      |  | (153,706                      | ) |  | $                                       | 12.00
|Vested                                        |  | (556,711                      | ) |  | $                                       | 12.00
|                                              |  |                               |   |  |                                         |      
|Unvested as of July 2, 2006                   |  | 2,989,320                     |   |  | $                                       | 12.09
|                                              |  |                               |   |  |                                         |      

4. Net Loss Per Share

The Company excluded 16.8 million shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of outstanding Class A common stock options and RSU awards and the assumed conversion of outstanding convertible debentures from
the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 because they had an antidilutive effect due to the net losses recorded. The Company had no potential common shares outstanding for the three or six
months ended June 26, 2005.

5. Comprehensive Loss

The following are the components of comprehensive loss:



|                                                                         |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |          |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------ | ------- | - | ---------------- | - | ------- | ------------ |  | - | ------------- | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                                                                         |  | Three Months Ended |         |   | Six Months Ended |  
|                                                                         |  | Jul. 2, 2006       |         |   | Jun. 26, 2005    |   |         | Jul. 2, 2006 |  |   | Jun. 26, 2005 |  
|                                                                         |  | (in thousands)     |         |   | (in thousands)   |  
|Net loss                                                                 |  | $                  | (48,759 | ) |                  | $ | (86,024 | )            |  | $ | (100,636      | ) |  | $ | (194,866 | )
|                                                                         |  |                    |         |  
|Net change in cumulative translation adjustment                          |  |                    | 19,611  |   |                  |   | (8,829  | )            |  |   | 17,817        |   |  |   | (34,544  | )
|Net change in unrealized gains on marketable securities, net of $0 taxes |  |                    | (6,230  | ) |                  |   |        |              |  |   | (7,291        | ) |  |   |         |  
|                                                                         |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |          |  
|Total comprehensive loss                                                 |  | $                  | (35,378 | ) |                  | $ | (94,853 | )            |  | $ | (90,110       | ) |  | $ | (229,410 | )
|                                                                         |  |                    |         |   |                  |   |         |              |  |   |               |   |  |   |          |  



12



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

6. Related Party Transactions

Prior to the second
quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company relied on AMD and Fujitsu as sole distributors of its products. The Company receives services from AMD and Fujitsu, including among others, certain information technology, facilities, logistics, legal, tax,
finance, human resources and environmental health and safety services. The charges for these services are negotiated annually between the Company and AMD and Fujitsu based on the Companys expected requirements and the estimated future costs of
the services to be provided. AMD has the right to review the proposed services to be provided by Fujitsu, and Fujitsu has the right to review the proposed services to be provided by AMD. The service charges are billed monthly on net 45 days terms.

The following tables present significant related party transactions and account balances between the Company and AMD (see Note 8 for
separate disclosure of debt obligations to related parties):



|                                      |  |                    |       |                  |               |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ----- | ---------------- | ------------- | - | ------------ |  | ------------- | ------- |  | - | -------
|                                      |  | Three Months Ended |       | Six Months Ended
|                                      |  | Jul. 2, 2006       |       |                  | Jun. 26, 2005 |   | Jul. 2, 2006 |  | Jun. 26, 2005
|                                      |  | (in thousands)    
|Net sales to AMD(1)                   |  | $                  |      |                  |               | $ | 257,357      |  | $             | 336,172 |  | $ | 487,548
|                                      |  |                    |       |                 
|Cost of sales:                        |  |                    |       |                  |               |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|Royalties to AMD                      |  | $                  | 1,659 |                  |               | $ | 3,853        |  | $             | 3,098   |  | $ | 7,375  
|                                      |  |                    |       |                 
|Service fees to AMD:                  |  |                    |       |                  |               |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|Cost of sales                         |  | $                  | (252  | )                |               | $ | 5,723        |  | $             | 2,719   |  | $ | 11,321 
|Research and development              |  |                    | 3,651 |                  |               |   | 6,102        |  |               | 7,289   |  |   | 12,966 
|Marketing, general and administrative |  |                    | 6,013 |                  |               |   | 13,651       |  |               | 15,158  |  |   | 28,343 
|                                      |  |                    |       |                  |               |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|Service fees to AMD(2)                |  | $                  | 9,412 |                  |               | $ | 25,476       |  | $             | 25,166  |  | $ | 52,630 
|                                      |  |                    |       |                  |               |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|Cost of employees seconded from AMD:  |  |                    |       |                  |               |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|Marketing, general and administrative |  | $                  |      |                  |               | $ | 680          |  | $             |        |  | $ | 1,088  
|                                      |  |                    |       |                  |               |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        

---

|(1) | In the second quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company began selling its products directly to the
customers previously served by AMD.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Service fees to AMD are net of reimbursements from AMD for services provided to AMD by the
Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)



|                                                                           |  |                |        |               |   |        
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------- | ------ | ------------- | - | -------
|                                                                           |  | Jul. 2, 2006   |        | Dec. 25, 2005
|                                                                           |  | (in thousands)
|Trade accounts receivable from AMD, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |  | $              | 41,195 |               | $ | 205,351
|Other receivables from AMD                                                 |  | $              | 1,861  |               | $ | 13,850 
|Accounts payable to AMD                                                    |  | $              | 1,838  |               | $ | 97,844 
|Royalties payable to AMD                                                   |  | $              | 3,097  |               | $ | 6,384  
|Accrued liabilities to AMD                                                 |  | $              | 11,650 |               | $ | 17,434 

The following tables present the significant related party transactions and account balances
between the Company and Fujitsu (see Note 8 for separate disclosure of debt obligations to related parties):



|                                                                                 |  |                    |         |                  |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ------- | ---------------- | - | ------------ |  | ------------- | ------- |  | - | -------
|                                                                                 |  | Three Months Ended |         | Six Months Ended
|                                                                                 |  | Jul. 2, 2006       |         | Jun. 26, 2005    |   | Jul. 2, 2006 |  | Jun. 26, 2005
|                                                                                 |  | (in thousands)    
|Net sales to Fujitsu                                                             |  | $                  | 258,617 |                  | $ | 205,010      |  | $             | 484,374 |  | $ | 408,008
|                                                                                 |  |                    |         |                 
|Cost of sales                                                                    |  |                    |         |                  |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|Royalties paid to Fujitsu                                                        |  | $                  | 1,659   |                  | $ | 3,853        |  | $             | 3,098   |  | $ | 7,375  
|Other purchases of goods and services from Fujitsu and rental expense to Fujitsu |  | $                  | 30,734  |                  | $ | 16,679       |  | $             | 59,779  |  | $ | 33,831 
|Subcontract manufacturing purchases from Fujitsu                                 |  | $                  | 3,736   |                  | $ | 8,686        |  | $             | 7,547   |  | $ | 19,255 
|Commercial die purchases from Fujitsu                                            |  | $                  | 17,668  |                  | $ | 21,791       |  | $             | 35,880  |  | $ | 40,983 
|                                                                                 |  |                    |         |                 
|Service fees to Fujitsu:                                                         |  |                    |         |                  |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|Cost of sales                                                                    |  | $                  | 561     |                  | $ | 837          |  | $             | 1,176   |  | $ | 1,688  
|Research and development                                                         |  |                    | 578     |                  |   | 1,779        |  |               | 1,326   |  |   | 3,584  
|Marketing, general and administrative                                            |  |                    | 1,113   |                  |   | 3,038        |  |               | 2,205   |  |   | 6,113  
|                                                                                 |  |                    |         |                  |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|Service fees to Fujitsu                                                          |  | $                  | 2,252   |                  | $ | 5,654        |  | $             | 4,707   |  | $ | 11,385 
|                                                                                 |  |                    |         |                  |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|                                                                                 |  |                    |         |                 
|Cost of employees seconded from Fujitsu:                                         |  |                    |         |                  |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|Cost of sales                                                                    |  | $                  | 18      |                  | $ | 456          |  | $             | 26      |  | $ | 742    
|Research and development                                                         |  |                    | 35      |                  |   | 2,626        |  |               | 61      |  |   | 4,245  
|Marketing, general and administrative                                            |  |                    | 61      |                  |   | 1,202        |  |               | 95      |  |   | 1,935  
|                                                                                 |  |                    |         |                  |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        
|Cost of employees seconded from Fujitsu                                          |  | $                  | 114     |                  | $ | 4,284        |  | $             | 182     |  | $ | 6,922  
|                                                                                 |  |                    |         |                  |   |              |  |               |         |  |   |        



14



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)



|                                       |  |                |         |               |   |        
|-------------------------------------- |  | -------------- | ------- | ------------- | - | -------
|                                       |  | Jul. 2, 2006   |         | Dec. 25, 2005
|                                       |  | (in thousands)
|Trade accounts receivable from Fujitsu |  | $              | 205,019 |               | $ | 199,224
|Other receivables from Fujitsu         |  | $              |        |               | $ | 217    
|Accounts payable to Fujitsu            |  | $              | 20,033  |               | $ | 25,957 
|Royalties payable to Fujitsu           |  | $              | 3,097   |               | $ | 6,384  
|Accrued liabilities to Fujitsu         |  | $              | 5,582   |               | $ |       

The Company licenses certain intellectual property from AMD and Fujitsu in exchange for the
payment of royalties to both AMD and Fujitsu. These royalty expenses are recognized in cost of sales. The Company is required to pay AMD and Fujitsu semi-annual royalties based on net sales (minus the costs of commercial die). The royalty as a
percentage of sales will decline to zero over a specified time. The term of the agreement expires in 2013.

Fujitsu provides test and
assembly services to the Company on a contract basis. Also, the Company purchases commercial die from Fujitsu, which is packaged together with the Companys Flash memory devices.

Fujitsu seconds certain employees to the Company and the Company pays these employees directly. AMD also seconded certain employees to the Company and
the Company reimbursed AMD for the costs of these employees until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.

7. Warranties and Indemnities

The Company offers a one-year limited warranty for its Flash memory products.

Changes in the Companys liability for product warranties in the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 and June 26, 2005 are as follows:



|                                                                                          |  |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |        |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ----- | - | ---------------- | - | ------ | ------------ |  | - | ------------ | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                                          |  | Three Months Ended |       |   | Six Months Ended |  
|                                                                                          |  | Jul. 2,2006        |       |   | Jun. 26,2005     |   |        | Jul. 2, 2006 |  |   | Jun. 26,2005 |  
|                                                                                          |  | (in thousands)     |       |   | (in thousands)   |  
|Balance, beginning of period                                                              |  | $                  | 1,000 |   |                  | $ | 600    |              |  | $ | 1,000        |   |  | $ | 600    |  
|Provision for warranties issued                                                           |  |                    | 876   |   |                  |   | 566    |              |  |   | 1,684        |   |  |   | 941    |  
|Settlements                                                                               |  |                    | (324  | ) |                  |   | (1,365 | )            |  |   | (2,242       | ) |  |   | (2,455 | )
|Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties during the period, including expirations |  |                    | (552  | ) |                  |   | 799    |              |  |   | 558          |   |  |   | 1,514  |  
|                                                                                          |  |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |        |  
|Balance, end of period                                                                    |  | $                  | 1,000 |   |                  | $ | 600    |              |  | $ | 1,000        |   |  | $ | 600    |  
|                                                                                          |  |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |              |  |   |              |   |  |   |        |  



15



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

In addition to product warranties, the Company, from time to time in its normal course of business, indemnifies other parties with whom it enters into
contractual relationships, including customers, directors, lessors and parties to other transactions with the Company, with respect to certain matters. The Company has agreed to hold the other party harmless against specified losses, such as those
arising from a breach of representations or covenants, third-party infringement claims or other claims made against certain parties. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount of liability under these indemnification obligations
due to the limited history of indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances that are likely to be involved in each particular claim and indemnification provision. Historically, there have been no indemnification claims.

8. Debt and Capital Lease Obligations

The
Companys debt and capital lease obligations consist of:



|                                                                   |  |                |         |               |   |        
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------- | ------- | ------------- | - | -------
|                                                                   |  | Jul. 2, 2006   |         | Dec. 25, 2005
|                                                                   |  | (in thousands)
|Debt obligations to related parties:                               |  |                |         |               |   |        
|Spansion China Line of Credit                                      |  | $              |        |               | $ | 15,000 
|Spansion Penang Loan                                               |  |                |        |               |   | 4,833  
|Spansion Penang Building Loan                                      |  |                |        |               |   | 5,112  
|Senior Subordinated Notes                                          |  |                |        |               |   | 158,970
|Promissory Note                                                    |  |                | 1,500   |               |   |       
|                                                                   |  |                |         |               |   |        
|Total debt obligations to related parties                          |  |                | 1,500   |               |   | 183,915
|Debt obligations to third parties:                                 |  |                |         |               |   |        
|Spansion Japan Term Loan                                           |  |                |        |               |   | 72,274 
|Spansion China Bank Enterprise Cooperation Revolver                |  |                | 33,660  |               |   | 18,722 
|Spansion Japan Revolving Credit Facility                           |  |                |        |               |   | 43,020 
|Senior Notes                                                       |  |                | 227,032 |               |   | 225,787
|Spansion Penang Loan                                               |  |                | 4,186   |               |   |       
|Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility               |  |                | 8,739   |               |   |       
|Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures                        |  |                | 207,000 |               |   |       
|Obligations under capital leases                                   |  |                | 137,260 |               |   | 215,895
|                                                                   |  |                |         |               |   |        
|Total debt obligations to third parties                            |  |                | 617,877 |               |   | 575,698
|                                                                   |  |                |         |               |   |        
|Total debt obligations                                             |  |                | 619,377 |               |   | 759,613
|Less: Current Portion                                              |  |                | 117,601 |               |   | 233,555
|                                                                   |  |                |         |               |   |        
|Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, less current portion |  | $              | 501,776 |               | $ | 526,058
|                                                                   |  |                |         |               |   |        

New Debt and Capital Lease Obligations and Activity for the Six Months Ended July 2, 2006:

Debt Obligations to Related Parties

Spansion China Line of
Credit

On February 15, 2006, the Company repaid the remaining outstanding principal of $15.0 million and accrued interest of
approximately $121,000 to AMD under the Spansion China Line of Credit.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

Spansion Penang Loan

In January 2006,
AMDs loan to Spansion Penang, more fully described under Debt Obligations to Third Parties  Spansion Penang Loan below, was transferred from AMD to a third-party financial institution. The loan bears a fixed annual interest
rate of 5.9 percent and is payable in equal, consecutive, monthly principal and interest installments through February 2009.

Spansion Penang
Building Loan

On June 28, 2006, the Company repaid AMD the remaining outstanding principal of approximately 19.3 million
Malaysian ringgit (approximately $5.4 million based on the exchange rate as of June 28, 2006) under the Spansion Penang Building Loan.

Senior
Subordinated Notes

On June 12, 2006, the Company repurchased and cancelled the 12.75% Senior Subordinated Notes. The Company
recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $17.3 million as a result of the repurchase of these notes. The loss included the write-off of debt issuance costs of approximately $2.0 million and the write-off of unamortized
discount of approximately $15.3 million.

Promissory Note

On February 27, 2006, the Company purchased a software license from AMD and, as payment, the Company issued a $3.0 million promissory note to AMD. As of July 2, 2006, the Company has repaid $1.5 million of
the principal of the promissory note. The remaining balance of $1.5 million is due in three quarterly principal installments of $500,000.

Debt
Obligations to Third Parties

Spansion Japan Term Loan

On December 30, 2005, Spansion Japan voluntarily prepaid and terminated the Spansion Japan Term Loan agreement. There were no penalties associated with the prepayment and termination of this loan agreement.

Spansion Japan Uncommitted Revolving Credit Facility

On December 30, 2005, Spansion Japan borrowed 2.0 billion yen (approximately $17.0 million as of March 26, 2006) under its uncommitted revolving credit facility agreement with a Japanese financial
institution. Spansion Japan repaid the principal balance and interest outstanding under this facility on March 31, 2006.

Spansion Japan 2006
Revolving Credit Facility

On December 26, 2005, Spansion Japan entered into an uncommitted revolving credit facility agreement
with a certain Japanese financial institution in the aggregate principal amount of up to 3.0 billion yen (or up to approximately $25.8 million as of December 26, 2005).

On December 30, 2005, Spansion Japan borrowed 1.0 billion yen (approximately $8.5 million as of December 30, 2005) under this facility. This
amount bore interest at a rate of 0.59 percent per annum and



17



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

was repaid on March 31, 2006. On January 10, 2006, Spansion Japan borrowed an additional 2.0 billion yen (approximately $17.5 million as of January 10,
2006) under this facility. This amount bore interest at a rate of 0.60 percent per annum and was repaid on April 10, 2006 (see Note 10).

Spansion Penang Loan

On January 29, 2004, Spansion Penang entered into a financial arrangement with AMD. Under
the terms of the arrangement, Spansion Penang borrowed approximately 29.0 million Malaysian Ringgit (approximately $8.0 million based on the exchange rate as of January 29, 2004) from AMD to fund the purchase of manufacturing equipment. In
January 2006, this loan was transferred from AMD to a third-party financial institution.

Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility

On March 31, 2006, Spansion Japan entered into an Amended and Restated Uncommitted Revolving Credit Facility Agreement with a
Japanese financial institution (the Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility), which provides for a revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of up to 8.0 billion yen (or up to approximately $69.9 million as of
July 2, 2006). The Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility replaced the Spansion Japan Revolving Credit Facility and Spansion Japan Uncommitted Revolving Credit Facility as a result of the merger of the two respective financial
institutions that had previously provided those separate facilities.

Pursuant to the terms of the Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving
Credit Facility, Spansion Japan may borrow amounts in increments of 50 million yen (approximately $436,939 as of July 2, 2006), which may remain outstanding in monthly increments of up to three months. Amounts borrowed bear interest at a
rate equal to TIBOR, at the time of the drawdown, plus a margin of 0.5 percent per annum.

Spansion Japan is not permitted, among other
things, to create any security interests or liens on any of its assets, subject to certain exceptions; subordinate the payment of its debt under this credit facility to the payment of any unsecured debts; or enter into any merger, company partition,
exchange or transfer of shares, assign all or a part of its business or assets to a third party, or otherwise transfer all or a material part of its assets to a third party, subject to certain exceptions.

All of Spansion Japans debts under the Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility will automatically become due and payable without any
notice or demand if proceedings of bankruptcy, insolvency, dissolution or similar matters are initiated by or against Spansion Japan. All of the debts under this credit facility will become due and payable upon notice to Spansion Japan by the
lenders in an event of default, which includes, among other things, the following: a default in performance of payment; any of Spansion Japans debts or guarantee obligations (other than those under Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit
Facility) in an aggregate amount exceeding 10 million yen (approximately $87,388 as of July 2, 2006) become due and payable; or the suspension of the business of Spansion Japan by Spansion Japan or by a government authority, in each case
if not cured within applicable time periods set forth in the Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility.

The Spansion Japan 2006
Merged Revolving Credit Facility may be terminated in the event of default or by either party upon written notice in accordance with its terms.

On May 12, 2006, Spansion Japan borrowed 1.0 billion yen (approximately $8.7 million as of July 2, 2006) under this facility. This amount bears interest at a rate of 0.65 percent per annum and must be repaid no later than
August 14, 2006. This amount is reflected as Notes payable on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at July 2, 2006.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures

On June 12, 2006, Spansion LLC, the wholly owned operating subsidiary of the Company, issued $180.0 million of aggregate principal amount of 2.25% Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2016. On June 26, 2006, Spansion
LLC issued an additional $27.0 million of aggregate principal amount of 2.25% Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2016 upon the initial purchasers exercise of their over-allotment option. The Debentures are general unsecured senior
subordinated obligations and rank subordinate in right of payment to all of the Companys senior indebtedness, including its 11.25% Senior Notes due 2016, senior in right of payment to all of the Companys subordinated indebtedness. The
Debentures bear interest at 2.25 percent per annum. Interest is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year beginning December 15, 2006 until the maturity date of June 15, 2016.

The Debentures are not exchangeable prior to January 6, 2007. On or after January 6, 2007, the Debentures will be exchangeable for shares of
the Companys Class A common stock, cash or a combination of cash and shares of such Class A common stock, at the Companys option. The Debentures provide that the Company may elect to employ net share settlement and under
certain circumstances the Debentures may be exchangeable for cash (up to the principal amount of the Debentures) and, with respect to any excess exchange value, into cash, shares of Class A common stock or a combination of cash and shares of
Class A common stock at an initial exchange rate of 56.7621 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Debentures. At the initial exchange rate, the Debentures will be exchangeable for Class A common stock at an exchange price of approximately
$17.62 per share. The exchange rate will be adjusted for certain antidilution events and will be increased in the case of corporate events that constitute a fundamental change of the Company under certain circumstances. The holders of the Debentures
will have the ability to require the Company to repurchase the Debentures in whole or in part for cash in the event of a fundamental change of the Company. In such case, the repurchase price would be 100 percent of the principal amount of the
Debentures plus any accrued and unpaid interest.

9. Spansion Japan Pension Plan

On September 1, 2005, the Company adopted the Spansion Japan Pension Plan. The following table summarizes the components of the net periodic pension
expense for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006:



|                                   |  |                                 |       |   |                               |   |        |  
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ----- | - | ----------------------------- | - | ------ | -
|                                   |  | Three months ended Jul. 2, 2006 |       |   | Six months ended Jul. 2, 2006 |  
|                                   |  | (in thousands)                  |      
|Service cost                       |  | $                               | 1,389 |   |                               | $ | 2,576  |  
|Interest cost                      |  |                                 | 488   |   |                               |   | 765    |  
|Expected return on plan assets     |  |                                 | (718  | ) |                               |   | (1,415 | )
|Amortization of prior service cost |  |                                 | 189   |   |                               |   | 372    |  
|                                   |  |                                 |       |   |                               |   |        |  
|Total net periodic pension expense |  | $                               | 1,348 |   |                               | $ | 2,298  |  
|                                   |  |                                 |       |   |                               |   |        |  



19



---

##### Table of Contents

Spansion Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued

(Unaudited)

10. Subsequent Events

Spansion Japan 2006
Revolving Credit Facility

On July 21, 2006, Spansion Japan borrowed 1.0 billion yen (approximately $8.7 million as of
July 21, 2006) under this facility. This amount bears interest at the rate of 0.85 percent per annum and must be repaid no later than August 21, 2006.

Spansion China Bank Enterprise Cooperation Revolver

On July 20, 2006, Spansion China repaid RMB
41 million (approximately $5.1 million as of July 20, 2006) under the RMB denominated credit facility. On July 27, 2006, Spansion China repaid approximately $5.0 million under the U.S dollar denominated credit facility.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking
Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the Exchange Act). These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. Words such as
expects, anticipates, targets, goals, projects, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates, continues,
may, and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and
trends in our businesses, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and
assumptions that are difficult to predict, including those identified in Item 1A, under Risk Factors, and elsewhere herein. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking
statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.

The following should be
read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this document.

Overview

We are the largest company in the world dedicated exclusively to developing, designing and manufacturing Flash memory, a critical
semiconductor component of nearly every electronic product and one of the fastest growing segments of the semiconductor industry. Our Flash memory is incorporated into a broad range of electronic products, including mobile phones, consumer
electronics, automotive electronics, networking and telecommunications equipment, PC and PC peripheral applications. Our products are integrated into products from original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, in each of these markets.

Our results for the three months ended July 2, 2006 reflected an increase in total net sales from the corresponding period of fiscal 2005. Our
results also reflected an increase in unit shipments and sales generated from products based on our MirrorBit technology, which represented approximately 43 percent of total net sales for the three months ended July 2, 2006, compared with
approximately 20 percent of total net sales for the corresponding period of fiscal 2005.

Our total net sales for the three and six months
ended July 2, 2006 were $655.4 million and $1,217.3 million, respectively. Total net sales increased significantly compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2005. Our net losses for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 were
$48.8 million and $100.6 million. Net losses for these periods include stock-based compensation expense of $6.4 million and $14.2 million, respectively.

Our total net sales for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005 were $462.4 million and $895.6 million, respectively. Our net losses for these periods were $86.0 million and $194.9 million. We did not
provide stock-based compensation to our employees or third parties and there was no stock-based compensation expense for these periods in fiscal 2005.



21



---

##### Table of Contents

During the three months ended July 2, 2006, we transitioned our information technology systems and
our sales processes from Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), which, along with Fujitsu Limited (Fujitsu), had previously served as the sole distributors of our products. With this transition, we began selling our products directly to AMDs
former customers and customers not served solely by Fujitsu. We also continued to expand our administrative functions and reduce our reliance on AMDs provision of administrative services.

Also during the three months ended July 2, 2006, we completed the sale of $207 million of our 2.25% Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures, and
repurchased our 12.75% Senior Subordinated Notes held by AMD.

Basis of Presentation

We use a 52- to 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday in December. The three months ended July 2, 2006 and June 26, 2005 consisted of 14
weeks and 13 weeks, respectively. The six months ended July 2, 2006 and June 26, 2005 consisted of 27 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively. The second quarter of fiscal 2006 consisted of one week more than a typical quarter.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and
analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts in our condensed consolidated financial statements. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis, including those related to our revenues, allowance
for doubtful accounts, inventories, asset impairments, income taxes and pension benefits. We base our estimates on experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Although actual results have historically been consistent with managements expectations, the actual results may differ from these estimates or our estimates may be
affected by different assumptions or conditions.

Other than our accounting policy described below regarding accounting for stock-based
compensation, our critical accounting policies, which incorporate our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements, are the same as those described in Part II, Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2005.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective December 26, 2005, we adopted Financial Accounting
Standards Boards (FASB) Statement No. 123(R) Share-Based Payment, which requires a public entity to reflect on its income statement, instead of pro forma disclosures in its financial footnotes, the cost of employee services
received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Statement 123(R) supersedes our previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, for periods beginning in fiscal 2006.

We adopted Statement 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method, which
requires the application of the accounting standard as of December 26, 2005, the first day of our fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. Our condensed consolidated financial statements as of and



22



---

##### Table of Contents

for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 reflected the impact of Statement 123(R). In accordance with the
modified prospective transition method, our consolidated financial statements for prior periods had not been restated to reflect, and did not include, the impact of Statement 123(R). Stock-based compensation expense recognized under Statement 123(R)
for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 was $4.3 million and $10.5 million, respectively, which consisted of stock-based compensation expense related to our stock options and restricted stock unit (RSU) awards. We did not provide
stock-based compensation to our employees or third parties prior to the IPO and there was no stock-based compensation expense related to stock options recognized under Opinion 25 during the three or six months ended June 26, 2005.

We estimated the fair value of our stock-based awards to employees using Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. The key estimates that management
must make in applying this model are the volatility of our stock over the expected terms of our awards and the expected terms of our awards. The expected volatility is based on our recent historical volatility and the volatilities of our competitors
who are in the same industry sector with similar characteristics (guideline companies) given our lack of historical realized volatility data. The expected term is based on the shortcut approach provided in SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107 for developing the estimate of the expected term of a plain vanilla employee stock option. Under this approach, the expected term would be presumed to be the mid-point between the vesting date and
the end of the contractual term. Each of these estimates requires a significant amount of management judgment.

Stock-based compensation
expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in our condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 included compensation expense for share-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 25, 2005 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance
with the pro forma provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and compensation expense for the share-based payment awards granted subsequent to December 25, 2005, based on the grant date fair
value estimated in accordance with the provisions of Statement 123(R). The compensation expense for all share-based payment awards was recognized using straight-line attribution method reduced for estimated forfeitures. Statement 123(R) requires
forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Because we do not have sufficient historical forfeiture experience related to our own stock-based
awards, we estimated forfeitures based on AMDs historical forfeiture rates as we believe these forfeiture rates to be the most indicative of our own expected forfeiture rate. In our pro forma information required under Statement 123 for the
periods prior to fiscal 2006, we accounted for forfeitures as they occurred.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Comparison of Net Sales

The following is a summary of our total net sales for the three and
six months ended July 2, 2006 and June 26, 2005:



|                |  |                                   |         |              |                  |                    |  |                     |         |  |              |   |               |   |                   |  |                    |         |  |   |         |  |     |  | 
|--------------- |  | --------------------------------- | ------- | ------------ | ---------------- | ------------------ |  | ------------------- | ------- |  | ------------ | - | ------------- | - | ----------------- |  | ------------------ | ------- |  | - | ------- |  | --- |  | 
|                |  | Three Months Ended                |         |              | Six Months Ended
|                |  | Jul. 2,2006                       |         | Jun. 26,2005 |                  | Variance in Dollar |  | Variance in Percent |         |  | Jul. 2, 2006 |   | Jun. 26, 2005 |   | Variance inDollar |  | Variance inPercent
|                |  | (in thousands, except percentage)
|Total net sales |  | $                                 | 655,352 |              | $                | 462,367            |  | $                   | 192,985 |  | 42           | % |               | $ | 1,217,281         |  | $                  | 895,556 |  | $ | 321,725 |  | 36%

Total net sales for the three months ended July 2, 2006 increased 42 percent compared to
total net sales for the three months ended June 26, 2005. The increase was primarily attributable to a 43 percent increase in unit shipments. Average selling prices for the three months ended July 2, 2006 as compared to the three months
ended June 26, 2005 were relatively flat. Total net sales for the six months ended July 2, 2006 increased 36 percent compared to total net sales for the six months ended June 26, 2005. The increase was primarily attributable to a 40
percent increase in unit shipments. Average selling prices for the six months ended July 2, 2006 as compared to the six months ended June 26, 2005 were relatively flat.

Comparison of Gross Margin, Expenses, Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net, Interest Expense and Income Tax Benefit

The following is a summary of gross margin; operating expenses; interest and other income (expense), net; interest expense and benefit for income taxes
for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 and June 26, 2005:



|                                         |  |                                       |         |   |                                       |   |         |                   |  |   |                    |   |  |             |   |  |               |         |   |                   |   |          |                    |  |   |         |   |  |      |  
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------- | ------- | - | ------------------------------------- | - | ------- | ----------------- |  | - | ------------------ | - |  | ----------- | - |  | ------------- | ------- | - | ----------------- | - | -------- | ------------------ |  | - | ------- | - |  | ---- | -
|                                         |  | Three Months Ended                    |         |   | Six Months Ended                      |  
|                                         |  | Jul. 2, 2006                          |         |   | Jun. 26,2005                          |   |         | Variance inDollar |  |   | Variance inPercent |   |  | Jul. 2,2006 |   |  | Jun. 26, 2005 |         |   | Variance inDollar |   |          | Variance inPercent | 
|                                         |  | (in thousands, except for percentage) |         |   | (in thousands, except for percentage) |  
|Cost of sales                            |  | $                                     | 523,295 |   |                                       | $ | 430,477 |                   |  | $ | 92,818             |   |  | 22          | % |  | $             | 976,285 |   |                   | $ | 867,163  |                    |  | $ | 109,122 |   |  | 13   | %
|Gross margin                             |  |                                       | 20      | % |                                       |   | 7       | %                 |  |   |                    |   |  |             |   |  |               | 20      | % |                   |   | 3        | %                  |  |   |         |   |  |      |  
|Research and development                 |  |                                       | 91,800  |   |                                       |   | 74,597  |                   |  |   | 17,203             |   |  | 23          | % |  |               | 176,358 |   |                   |   | 145,976  |                    |  |   | 30,382  |   |  | 21   | %
|Marketing, general and administrative    |  |                                       | 67,305  |   |                                       |   | 45,426  |                   |  |   | 21,879             |   |  | 48          | % |  |               | 129,724 |   |                   |   | 81,525   |                    |  |   | 48,199  |   |  | 59   | %
|Operating loss                           |  |                                       | (27,048 | ) |                                       |   | (88,133 | )                 |  |   | 61,085             |   |  | -69         | % |  |               | (65,086 | ) |                   |   | (199,108 | )                  |  |   | 134,022 |   |  | -67  | %
|                                         |  |                                       |         |   |                                       |   |         |                  
|Interest and other income (expense), net |  |                                       | (6,126  | ) |                                       |   | 779     |                   |  |   | (6,905             | ) |  | -886        | % |  |               | (147    | ) |                   |   | 2,064    |                    |  |   | (2,211  | ) |  | -107 | %
|Interest expense                         |  |                                       | (18,391 | ) |                                       |   | (11,076 | )                 |  |   | (7,315             | ) |  | 66          | % |  |               | (37,185 | ) |                   |   | (22,211  | )                  |  |   | (14,974 | ) |  | 67   | %
|Benefit for income taxes                 |  |                                       | (2,806  | ) |                                       |   | (12,406 | )                 |  |   | 9,600              |   |  | -77         | % |  |               | (1,782  | ) |                   |   | (24,389  | )                  |  |   | 22,607  |   |  | -93  | %

The increase in gross margin was primarily due to an increase in the sales of our higher margin
MirrorBit products and improved factory utilization. MirrorBit sales represented approximately 43 percent and 39 percent of sales for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006 as compared to approximately 20 percent and 17 percent of sales
for the three and six months ended June 26, 2005. The increase in gross margin is partially offset by the stock-based compensation expense of $3.2 million and $7.1 million for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006, which was included
in the cost of sales. We did not have a comparable charge for the corresponding period of fiscal 2005.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

The increase in research and development expense was primarily due to an increase in 300-millimeter
development costs, which represented approximately 32 percent and 36 percent of the increase for three and six months ended July 2, 2006. Also, we incurred higher labor costs primarily related to increased headcount during the periods and the
impact of an extra work week for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006. The increase in labor costs accounted for approximately 24 percent and 25 percent of the increase for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006. Research and
development included $1.6 million and $3.6 million of stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006. We did not have a comparable charge for the corresponding period of fiscal 2005.

The increase in marketing, general and administrative was primarily due to the additional information technology, legal and consulting fees incurred as a
new public entity. These additional costs accounted for approximately 59 percent and 40 percent of the increase for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006. Additionally, the increase in headcount, partially offset by the reduction in
service charges from AMD, accounted for approximately 13 percent and 38 percent of the increase for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006. Marketing, general and administrative included $1.6 million and $3.6 million of stock-based
compensation expense for the three and six months ended July 2, 2006. We did not have a comparable charge for the corresponding period of fiscal 2005.

The increase in interest and other expense, net was primarily due to a $17.3 million loss on early extinguishment of debt as a result of the repurchase and cancellation of the 12.75% Senior Subordinated Notes,
partially offset by approximately $6.9 million of realized gain from the sale of marketable securities in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase in other expense, net is also partially offset by the increase in income generated from the
investment of a portion of the proceeds from our IPO in cash equivalents and marketable securities during the six months ended July 2, 2006.

The increase in interest expense was primarily due to the additional interest expense on senior notes and senior subordinated notes issued at end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005.

We recorded an income tax benefit of $2.8 million in the three months ended July 2, 2006 as compared to $12.4 million of tax benefits in the three
months ended June 26, 2005. The income tax benefit recorded in the three months ended July 2, 2006 was primarily due to a benefit from resolution of a tax examination in a foreign jurisdiction, offset by tax provisions of our foreign
subsidiaries. As part of our projected tax provision for the current year, we anticipate an increase of our valuation allowance against our U.S deferred tax assets to offset the tax benefits for current year losses in the U.S. The income tax benefit
recorded in the three months ended June 26, 2005 was primarily related to losses in certain foreign jurisdictions.

We recorded an
income tax benefit of $1.8 million in the six months ended July 2, 2006 as compared to $24.4 million of tax benefits in the six months ended June 26, 2005. The income tax benefit recorded in the six months ended July 2, 2006 was
primarily due to a benefit from resolution of a tax examination in a foreign jurisdiction, offset by tax provisions of our foreign subsidiaries. The income tax benefit recorded in the six months ended June 26, 2005 was primarily related to
losses in certain foreign jurisdictions.

As of July 2, 2006, most of our U.S. deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities,
continue to be subject to a full valuation allowance that was initially established in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005 upon our conversion to a taxable entity immediately prior to our IPO. The realization of these assets is dependent on
substantial future taxable income which at July 2, 2006, in managements estimate, is not more likely than not to be achieved.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

Other Items

In the second quarter of fiscal 2006, we began selling our products directly to our customers, including AMDs former customers and customers not served solely by Fujitsu.

The impact on our operating results from changes in foreign currency exchange rates has not been material, principally because our expenses denominated
in yen are generally comparable to our sales denominated in yen, and we enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to mitigate our exposure when yen denominated expenses and sales are not comparable.

As of July 2, 2006, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options and RSU awards was approximately $42.7 million after
reduction for estimated forfeitures, and such stock options and RSU awards will generally vest ratably through 2010.

Financial Condition

Our cash and cash equivalents at July 2, 2006, totaled $354.5 million and consisted of cash, time deposits, money market funds and
commercial paper. We are subject to restrictions on our distribution of cash due to provisions in certain third-party debt obligations described below.

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $73.1
million in the six months ended July 2, 2006. Non-cash charges included in the net loss consisted primarily of $272.4 million of depreciation and amortization, loss on debt extinguishment of $17.3 million and compensation cost recognized under
stock plans of $14.2 million. The net changes in operating assets in the six months ended July 2, 2006 were primarily attributable to a decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $36.7 million, an increase in accounts receivable of
$24.2 million, and an increase in inventories of $25.9 million compared to December 25, 2005.

Net cash provided by operating
activities was $84.2 million in the six months ended June 26, 2005. Non-cash charges included in the net loss consisted primarily of $281.3 million of depreciation and amortization. The net changes in operating assets in the six months ended
June 26, 2005 were primarily attributable to a decrease in accounts receivable of $25.4 million and a decrease in net inventory of $10.4 million compared to December 26, 2004.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $79.5 million in the six months ended July 2, 2006, primarily as a result of $290.9 million used to
purchase property, plant and equipment and a cash outflow of $63.6 million for the purchase of marketable securities, offset in part by a cash inflow of $272.7 million from the maturity and sale of marketable securities.

Net cash used in investing activities was $120.1 million in the six months ended June 26, 2005, primarily as a result of $139.3 million used to
purchase property, plant and equipment, and a cash outflow of $10.0 million from the purchases of marketable securities, offset in part by a cash inflow of $28.6 million from maturity of marketable securities.

Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $162.2 million in the six months ended July 2, 2006. This amount included $476.6 million in payments on debt and capital lease obligations, including $196.6 million in
payments to AMD, of which $175.0 million was used to repurchase the 12.75% Senior Subordinated Notes, and $6.0 million in payments to AMD for stock-based compensation, offset in part by a cash inflow of $320.4 million of proceeds from borrowings,
net of issuance costs, of which approximately $204 million was from the issuance of 2.25% Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures.

Net
cash provided by financing activities was $27.9 million in the six months ended June 26, 2005. This amount included $78.1 million of proceeds received from equipment sale-leaseback transactions and $50.5 million of proceeds from borrowings, net
of issuance costs, offset by $103.6 million in payments on debt and capital lease obligations, including $4.5 million in payments to AMD.



27



---

##### Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our principal contractual obligations at July 2, 2006. The table does not include estimated interest payments due on our various borrowings. The table is supplemented by the
discussion following the table.



|                                                           |  |                |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |        |  |                 |        |  |   |     |  |   |        
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------- | ------- | ---- | - | ------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ------ |  | --------------- | ------ |  | - | --- |  | - | -------
|                                                           |  | Total          |         | 2006 |   | 2007    |  | 2008 |         | 2009 |   | 2010   |  | 2011 and Beyond
|                                                           |  | (in thousands)
|Contractual obligations to related parties:                |  |                |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |        |  |                 |        |  |   |     |  |   |        
|                                                           |  |                |         |      |   |         | 
|Promissory Note                                            |  | $              | 1,500   |      | $ | 1,000   |  | $    | 500     |      | $ |       |  | $               |       |  | $ |    |  | $ |       
|                                                           |  |                |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |        |  |                 |        |  |   |     |  |   |        
|Total principal contractual obligations to related parties |  |                | 1,500   |      |   | 1,000   |  |      | 500     |      |   |       |  |                 |       |  |   |    |  |   |       
|                                                           |  |                |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |        |  |                 |        |  |   |     |  |   |        
|Contractual obligations to third parties:                  |  |                |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |        |  |                 |        |  |   |     |  |   |        
|Spansion China Bank Enterprise Cooperation Revolver        |  |                | 33,660  |      |   | 10,153  |  |      | 20,316  |      |   | 3,191  |  |                 |       |  |   |    |  |   |       
|Senior Notes                                               |  |                | 250,000 |      |   |        |  |      |        |      |   |       |  |                 |       |  |   |    |  |   | 250,000
|Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility       |  |                | 8,739   |      |   | 8,739   |  |      |        |      |   |       |  |                 |       |  |   |    |  |   |       
|Spansion Penang Loan                                       |  |                | 4,186   |      |   | 785     |  |      | 1,570   |      |   | 1,570  |  |                 | 261    |  |   |    |  |   |       
|Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures                |  |                | 207,000 |      |   |        |  |      |        |      |   |       |  |                 |       |  |   |    |  |   | 207,000
|Capital lease obligations                                  |  |                | 137,260 |      |   | 40,462  |  |      | 56,544  |      |   | 25,402 |  |                 | 14,852 |  |   |    |  |   |       
|                                                           |  |                |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |        |  |                 |        |  |   |     |  |   |        
|Total principal contractual obligations to third parties   |  |                | 640,845 |      |   | 60,139  |  |      | 78,430  |      |   | 30,164 |  |                 | 15,113 |  |   |    |  |   | 457,000
|                                                           |  |                |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |        |  |                 |        |  |   |     |  |   |        
|Operating Leases                                           |  |                | 27,397  |      |   | 9,195   |  |      | 12,199  |      |   | 5,203  |  |                 | 348    |  |   | 226 |  |   | 226    
|Unconditional purchase commitments                         |  |                | 96,805  |      |   | 36,207  |  |      | 31,578  |      |   | 27,271 |  |                 | 1,749  |  |   |    |  |   |       
|                                                           |  |                |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |        |  |                 |        |  |   |     |  |   |        
|Total contractual obligations                              |  | $              | 766,547 |      | $ | 106,540 |  | $    | 122,707 |      | $ | 62,638 |  | $               | 17,210 |  | $ | 226 |  | $ | 457,226
|                                                           |  |                |         |      |   |         |  |      |         |      |   |        |  |                 |        |  |   |     |  |   |        

New Debt and Capital Lease Obligations and Activity for the Six Months Ended July 2, 2006:

Debt Obligations to Related Parties

Spansion China Line of
Credit

On February 15, 2006, we repaid the remaining outstanding principal of $15.0 million and accrued interest of
approximately $121,000 to AMD under the Spansion China Line of Credit.

Spansion Penang Loan

In January 2006, AMDs loan to Spansion Penang, more fully described under Debt Obligations to Third Parties  Spansion Penang Loan
below, was transferred from AMD to a third-party financial institution. The loan bears a fixed annual interest rate of 5.9 percent and is payable in equal, consecutive, monthly principal and interest installments through February 2009.

Spansion Penang Building Loan

On
June 28, 2006, we repaid the remaining outstanding principal of approximately 19.3 million Malaysian ringgit (approximately $5.4 million based on the exchange rate as of June 28, 2006) under the Spansion Penang Building Loan.



28



---

##### Table of Contents

Senior Subordinated Notes

On June 12, 2006, we repurchased and cancelled the 12.75% Senior Subordinated Notes. We recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $17.3 million as a result of the repurchase of the Senior
Subordinated Notes. The loss included the write-off of debt issuance costs of approximately $2.0 million and the write-off of unamortized discount of approximately $15.3 million.

Promissory Note

On February 27, 2006, we purchased a software license from AMD and, as
payment, we issued a $3.0 million promissory note to AMD. As of July 2, 2006, we have repaid $1.5 million of the principal of the promissory note. The remaining balance of $1.5 million is due in three quarterly principal installments of
$500,000.

Debt Obligations to Third Parties

Spansion Japan Term Loan

On December 30, 2005, Spansion Japan voluntarily prepaid and terminated the Spansion
Japan Term Loan agreement. There were no penalties associated with the prepayment and termination of this loan agreement.

Spansion Japan Uncommitted
Revolving Credit Facility

On December 30, 2005, Spansion Japan borrowed 2.0 billion yen (approximately $17.0 million as of
March 26, 2006) under its uncommitted revolving credit facility agreement with a Japanese financial institution. Spansion Japan repaid the principal balance and interest outstanding under this facility on March 31, 2006.

Spansion Japan 2006 Revolving Credit Facility

On December 26, 2005, Spansion Japan entered into an uncommitted revolving credit facility agreement with a certain Japanese financial institution in the aggregate principal amount of up to 3.0 billion yen (or up to approximately $25.8
million as of December 26, 2005). Because the amount subject to the credit facility is denominated in yen, the dollar amount stated above is subject to change based on applicable exchange rates.

On December 30, 2005, Spansion Japan borrowed 1.0 billion yen (approximately $8.5 million as of December 30, 2005) under this facility. This
amount bore interest at a rate of 0.59 percent per annum and was repaid on March 31, 2006. On January 10, 2006, Spansion Japan borrowed an additional 2.0 billion yen (approximately $17.5 million as of January 10, 2006) under this
facility. This amount bore interest at a rate of 0.60 percent per annum and was repaid on April 10, 2006.

On July 21, 2006,
Spansion Japan borrowed 1.0 billion yen (approximately $8.7 million as of July 21, 2006) under this facility. This amount bears interest at the rate of 0.85 percent per annum and must be repaid no later than August 21, 2006.

Spansion Penang Loan

On January 29,
2004, Spansion Penang entered into a financial arrangement with AMD. Under the terms of the arrangement, Spansion Penang borrowed approximately 29.0 million



29



---

##### Table of Contents

Malaysian ringgit (approximately $7.6 million based on the exchange rate as of January 29, 2004) from AMD to fund
the purchase of manufacturing equipment. In January 2006, this loan was transferred from AMD to a third-party financial institution.

Spansion Japan
2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility

On March 31, 2006, Spansion Japan entered into an Amended and Restated Uncommitted
Revolving Credit Facility Agreement with a Japanese financial institution (the Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility), which provides for a revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of up to 8.0 billion yen (or up to
approximately $69.9 million as of July 2, 2006). The Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility replaced the Spansion Japan Revolving Credit Facility and Spansion Japan Uncommitted Revolving Credit Facility as a result of the merger
of the two respective financial institutions that had previously provided those separate facilities.

Pursuant to the terms of the Spansion
Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility, Spansion Japan may borrow amounts in increments of 50 million yen (approximately $436,939 as of July 2, 2006), which may remain outstanding in monthly increments of up to three months. Amounts
borrowed bear interest at a rate equal to TIBOR, at the time of the drawdown, plus a margin of 0.5 percent per annum.

Spansion Japan is
not permitted, among other things, to create any security interests or liens on any of its assets, subject to certain exceptions; subordinate the payment of its debt under this credit facility to the payment of any unsecured debts; or enter into any
merger, company partition, exchange or transfer of shares, assign all or a part of its business or assets to a third party, or otherwise transfer all or a material part of its assets to a third party, subject to certain exceptions.

All of Spansion Japans debts under the Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility will automatically become due and payable without any
notice or demand if proceedings of bankruptcy, insolvency, dissolution or similar matters are initiated by or against Spansion Japan. All of the debts under this credit facility will become due and payable upon notice to Spansion Japan by the
lenders in an event of default, which includes, among other things, the following: a default in performance of payment; any of Spansion Japans debts or guarantee obligations (other than those under Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit
Facility) in an aggregate amount exceeding 10 million yen (approximately $87,388 as of July 2, 2006) become due and payable; or the suspension of the business of Spansion Japan by Spansion Japan or by a government authority, in each case
if not cured within applicable time periods set forth in the Spansion Japan 2006 Merged Revolving Credit Facility.

The Spansion Japan 2006
Merged Revolving Credit Facility may be terminated in the event of default or by either party upon written notice in accordance with its terms.

On May 12, 2006, Spansion Japan borrowed 1.0 billion yen (approximately $8.7 million as of July 2, 2006) under this facility. This amount bears interest at a rate of 0.65 percent per annum and must be repaid no later than
August 14, 2006. This amount is reflected as Notes payable on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at July 2, 2006.

Exchangeable
Senior Subordinated Debentures

On June 12, 2006, Spansion LLC issued $180.0 million of aggregate principal amount of 2.25%
Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2016. On June 26, 2006, Spansion LLC issued an additional $27.0 million of aggregate principal amount of 2.25% Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2016 upon the initial
purchasers exercise of their



30



---

##### Table of Contents

over-allotment option. The Debentures are general unsecured senior subordinate obligations and rank subordinated in right
of payment to all of our senior indebtedness, including its 11.25% Senior Notes due 2016, equal in right of payment to all of our senior subordinated indebtedness and senior in right of payment to all of our subordinated indebtedness. The Debentures
bear interest at 2.25 percent per annum. Interest is payable on June 15 and December 15 of each year beginning December 15, 2006, until the maturity date of June 15, 2016.

The Debentures are not exchangeable prior to January 6, 2007. On or after January 6, 2007, the Debentures will be exchangeable for shares of
the our Class A common stock, cash or a combination of cash and shares of such Class A common stock, at our option. The Debentures provide that we may elect to employ net share settlement and under certain circumstances the Debentures may
be exchangeable for cash (up to the principal amount of the Debentures) and, with respect to any excess exchange value, into cash, shares of our Class A common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our Class A common stock at an
initial exchange rate of 56.7621 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Debentures. At the initial exchange rate, the Debentures will be exchangeable for our Class A common stock at an exchange price of approximately $17.62 per share. The
exchange rate will be adjusted for certain antidilution events and will be increased in the case of corporate events that constitute a fundamental change to us under certain circumstances. The holders of the Debentures will have the ability to
require us to repurchase the Debentures in whole or in part for cash in the event of a fundamental change to us. In such case, the repurchase price would be 100 percent of the principal amount of the Debentures plus any accrued and unpaid interest.

Spansion China Bank Enterprise Cooperation Revolver

On July 20, 2006, Spansion China repaid RMB 41 million (approximately $5.1 million as of July 20, 2006) under the RMB denominated credit facility. On July 27, 2006, Spansion China repaid
approximately $5.0 million under the U.S dollar denominated credit facility.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary future cash needs on a recurring basis will be working capital, capital expenditures and debt service. The total amount due under contractual
obligations during the remainder of fiscal 2006 is $106.5 million, excluding interest on our borrowings. We expect our interest payments to increase in fiscal 2006 compared to fiscal 2005 primarily as a result of the issuance of our senior notes and
exchangeable senior subordinated debentures.

Our ability to fund our cash needs will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future,
which is subject to general economic, financial, competitive and other factors, such as those discussed in Part II, Item 1.A. Risk Factors, many of which are beyond our control. Should we require additional funding, such as to
satisfy our short-term and long-term debt obligations when due or to make additional capital investments, we may need to raise the required additional funds through bank borrowings or public or private sales of debt or equity securities. We cannot
assure you that such funding will be available in needed quantities or on terms favorable to us, if at all.

We believe that anticipated
cash flows from operations and current cash balances, available external financing and our existing credit facilities will be sufficient to fund working capital requirements, capital investments, debt service and operations and meet our needs over
at least the next twelve months. The total availability under our credit facilities, which is subject to certain borrowing base limitations and other covenants, was approximately $267.7 million as of July 2, 2006.



31



---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Reference is made to Part II,
Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2005. We experienced no significant changes in market risk during the second quarter
of fiscal 2006 except as follows: During the second quarter of fiscal 2006, the Japanese yen strengthened against the U.S dollar. As a result, the cumulative translation adjustment balance has increased for the three months ended July 2, 2006.
This increase is primarily due to the translation impact of the functional currency used to account for the net assets of our subsidiary in Japan to our reporting currency, which is the U.S. dollar. However, this translation impact does not affect
our earnings or our cash flows as this translation adjustment is recorded as a component of stockholders equity in our balance sheet. As foreign currency exchange rates fluctuate relative to the U.S. dollar, we expect to continue to incur
significant foreign currency translation adjustments, which will either increase or decrease our total stockholders equity balance. In addition, we cannot give any assurance as to the effect that future changes in foreign currency rates will
have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Based on our managements evaluation (with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer), as of the end of
the period covered by this report, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes to the Companys internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our managements evaluation that
occurred during the second quarter of fiscal 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



32



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and
Spansion LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 05-04063 (CW), in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California

On October 7, 2005, Tessera, Inc. filed a complaint, Civil Action No. 05-04063, for patent infringement against Spansion LLC and AMD in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California under the patent laws of the United States of America, 35 U.S.C. section 1, et seq., including 35 U.S.C. section 271. The complaint alleges that Spansion LLCs ball grid array and multichip packages infringe the following
Tessera patents: United States Patent No. 5,679,977, United States Patent No. 5,852,326, United States Patent No. 6,433,419 and United States Patent No. 6,465,893. On December 16, 2005, Tessera filed a First Amended
Complaint naming Spansion and Spansion Technology Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, as defendants. On January 31, 2006, Tessera filed a Second Amended Complaint adding Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc., Chipmos Technologies, Inc.,
Chipmos U.S.A., Inc., Silicon Precision Industries Co., Ltd., Siliconware USA, Inc., ST Microelectronics N.V., ST Microelectronics, Inc., Stats Chippac Ltd., Stats Chippac, Inc., and Stats 34 Chippac (BVI) Limited. The Second Amended Complaint
alleges that Spansion LLCs ball grid array and multichip packages infringe on four Tessera patents. The Second Amended Complaint further alleges that each of the newly named defendants is in breach of a Tessera license agreement and is
infringing on five Tessera patents. The Second Amended Complaint seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief. On February 9, 2006, Spansion filed an answer to the Second Amended Complaint and asserted counterclaims against Tessera. On
April 18, 2006, U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken issued a Case Management Order that sets a trial date of January 28, 2008.

Tessera has requested the following findings and remedies:



| |  |  | a finding that Tesseras patents are valid and enforceable and that we are deliberately and willfully infringing Tesseras patents;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | injunctive relief prohibiting us from engaging in any further conduct that would infringe Tesseras patents;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | an award to Tessera to recover all damages, including interest on damages, from the alleged infringement;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | an award of treble damages for deliberate and willful conduct;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a finding that the case is exceptional, in which case attorney fees should be awarded to the prevailing party; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | an unspecified award of attorneys fees and costs.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------

We believe that we have meritorious defenses against Tesseras claims and we intend to defend the lawsuit vigorously.



33



---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The demand for our products depends in large part on continued growth in the
industries into which they are sold. A market decline in any of these industries, or a decline in demand for Flash memory products in these industries, would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Sales of our Flash memory products, which to date have been based on the NOR architecture, are dependent to a large degree upon consumer demand for mobile
phones. In fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005, wireless customers, which primarily consist of mobile phone original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, represented the largest market for NOR Flash memory because mobile phone OEMs have traditionally used
products based on NOR architecture to satisfy both code and data storage requirements within their mobile phones. The market research firm iSuppli has estimated that wireless communications represented approximately 63.4 percent of the NOR Flash
memory market in 2005 including commercial die. In fiscal 2005 and the first six months of fiscal 2006, sales to wireless Flash memory customers drove a majority of our sales. If demand for mobile phones is below our expectations or if the
functionality of successive generations of mobile phones do not require increasing Flash memory density or if mobile phones do not require Flash memory at all, we would be materially adversely affected.

Similarly, sales of our products targeting embedded Flash memory customers are dependent upon demand for consumer electronics such as set top boxes, or
STBs, and DVD players, automotive electronics, industrial electronics such as networking equipment, PC and PC peripheral equipment such as printers. Sales of our products are also dependent upon the inclusion of increasing amounts of Flash memory
content in some of these products. In fiscal 2005 and the first six months of fiscal 2006, sales to embedded Flash memory customers drove a significant portion of our sales. If demand for these products, or Flash memory content in these products, is
below our expectations, we would be materially adversely affected.

We will lose or have lost rights to key intellectual property
arrangements once we are no longer a beneficiary of AMDs patent cross-license agreements and other licenses, which creates a greatly increased risk of patent or other intellectual property infringement claims against us.

As a subsidiary of AMD through December 21, 2005, we were the beneficiary of AMDs intellectual property arrangements with third parties,
including patent cross-license agreements with other major semiconductor companies such as Intel, Motorola and IBM, and licenses from third parties for technology incorporated in our products and software used to operate our business. Since the
completion of our initial public offering in December 2005, we are no longer a beneficiary under a number of these agreements. As a result, we lost rights to use intellectual property that we were previously licensed to use and may therefore be
subject to claims that we are infringing intellectual property rights of third parties through the manufacture and sale of our products and the operation of our business. Therefore, absent negotiating our own license agreements with the third
parties who own such intellectual property, we will be vulnerable to claims by such parties that our products or operations infringe such parties patents or other intellectual property rights. In addition, third parties may have refrained from
asserting intellectual property infringement claims against us because we were previously a majority-owned subsidiary of AMD. Now that we are an independent standalone company, they may elect to pursue such claims against us.

While we will eventually lose the benefits that we previously enjoyed under some of AMDs patent cross-license agreements and other licenses, we
believe we will continue to be a beneficiary for some period of time while AMD continues to hold a majority of our shares entitled to vote for the election of our directors and while AMD continues to be a party to such



34



---

##### Table of Contents

agreements and licenses. However, we expect that AMD will no longer hold a majority of such voting shares upon the
conversion of the Class D common stock held by Fujitsu. The Class D common stock held by Fujitsu will convert to Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis upon the earlier of December 21, 2006, and the date upon which our board elects to
cause the Class D common stock to convert to Class A common stock, following a determination that such conversion is in our best interests. However, we cannot assure you that the other parties under these patent cross-license agreements and
licenses will not challenge our ability to assert rights as a beneficiary under such patent cross-license agreements and licenses.

With
the assistance of AMD, we will attempt to negotiate our own agreements and arrangements with third parties for intellectual property and technology that is important to our business, including the intellectual property that we previously had access
to through our relationship with AMD. We will also attempt to acquire new patents with the assistance of AMD, as our success in negotiating patent cross-license agreements with other industry participants will depend in large part upon the strength
of our patent portfolio relative to that of the third party with which we are negotiating. If the third-party benefits from an existing patent cross-license agreement with AMD, in many cases it will retain the rights that it has under that agreement
even after we cease to be an AMD subsidiary, including rights to utilize the patents that AMD and Fujitsu transferred to us in connection with our reorganization as Spansion LLC in June 2003. In many cases, any such third party will also retain such
rights to utilize any patents that have been issued to us or acquired by us subsequent to our reorganization and prior to our no longer being a subsidiary of AMD. Our negotiating position may therefore be impaired, because the other party will
already be entitled to utilize a large number, or even all, of our patents, while we will no longer have the right to utilize that partys patents. As a result, we may be unable to obtain access to the other partys patent portfolio on
favorable terms or at all. Similarly, with respect to licenses from third parties for technology incorporated in our products or software used to operate our business, we may not be able to negotiate prices with these third parties on terms as
favorable to us as those available when we were a subsidiary of AMD because we will not be able to take advantage of AMDs current size and purchasing power. These parties, and other third parties with whom AMD had no prior intellectual
property arrangement, may file lawsuits against us seeking damages (potentially including treble damages) or an injunction against the sale of our products that incorporate allegedly infringed intellectual property or against the operation of our
business as presently conducted. Such litigation could be extremely expensive and time-consuming. We cannot assure you that such litigation would be avoided or successfully concluded. The award of damages, including material royalty payments, or the
entry of an injunction against the manufacture or sale of some or all of our products, would have a material adverse effect on us.

A
lack of market acceptance of MirrorBit technology would have a material adverse effect on us.

Market acceptance of products based
on our MirrorBit technology is a critical factor impacting our ability to increase revenues and market share in the integrated category of the Flash memory market, as well as to enter new markets. MirrorBit technology is a memory cell architecture
that enables Flash memory products to store two or more bits of data in a single memory cell thereby doubling the density or storage capacity of each memory cell. If adoption of our MirrorBit technology occurs at a slower rate than we anticipate,
our ability to compete will be reduced, and we would be materially adversely affected. In addition, in fiscal 2006, we plan to introduce new products for integrated Flash memory applications based on our 90-nanometer MirrorBit technology. If we do
not achieve market acceptance of these products or subsequent MirrorBit products, our future operating results would be materially adversely affected.



35



---

##### Table of Contents

A significant market shift to NAND architecture would materially adversely affect us.

Flash memory products are generally based either on NOR architecture, or NAND architecture. To date, our Flash memory products have
been based on NOR architecture which are typically produced at a higher cost-per-bit than NAND-based products. We do not currently manufacture products based on NAND architecture. We have developed MirrorBit ORNAND architecture to address markets
currently served by NAND-based products, but we cannot be certain that our ORNAND-based products will satisfactorily address the markets currently served by NAND-based products.

During 2003 and 2004, industry sales of NAND-based Flash memory products grew at a higher rate than sales of NOR-based Flash memory products, resulting
in NAND vendors in aggregate gaining a greater share of the overall Flash memory market and NOR vendors in aggregate losing overall market share. This trend continued in 2005 and sales of NAND-based Flash memory products represented a majority of
the Flash memory products sold in the overall Flash memory market in 2005. In 2004, according to iSuppli, total sales for the Flash memory market reached $15.9 billion, of which 58.4 percent was classified as sales of NOR-based Flash memory products
and 41.6 percent was classified as sales of NAND-based Flash memory products. In 2005, according to iSuppli, total sales for the Flash memory market reached $18.6 billion, of which 42.2 percent was classified as sales of NOR-based Flash memory
products and 57.8 percent was classified as sales of NAND-based Flash memory products. We expect this trend of decreasing market share for NOR-based Flash memory products to continue in the future. iSuppli estimates that sales of NAND-based Flash
memory products grew by 62 percent from 2004 to 2005 and will grow at a 20.1 percent compound annual growth rate from 2005 to 2010, while sales of NOR-based Flash memory products declined by 4.0 percent from 2004 to 2005 and will grow at a 6.9
percent compound annual growth rate from 2005 to 2010.

Moreover, the removable storage category of the Flash memory market, which is
predominantly served by NAND vendors, is expected to be the largest portion of the Flash memory market for the foreseeable future. As mobile phones and other consumer electronics become more advanced, they will require higher density Flash memory to
meet the increased data storage requirements associated with music downloads, photos and videos. Because storage requirements will increase to accommodate data-intensive applications, OEMs may increasingly choose higher density Flash memory products
over NOR-based Flash memory products for their applications. If this occurs and OEMs continue to prefer the attributes and characteristics of NAND-based products over those of MirrorBit ORNAND-based products for their applications, we may be
materially and adversely affected. Moreover, some NAND vendors are manufacturing on 300-millimeter wafers or are utilizing more advanced manufacturing process technologies than we are today, which result in an ability to offer products with a lower
cost-per bit at a given product density. If NAND vendors continue to increase their share of the Flash memory market, our market share may decrease, which would materially adversely affect us.

If we fail to successfully develop products based on our new MirrorBit ORNAND architecture, or if there is a lack of market acceptance of products
based on our MirrorBit ORNAND architecture, our future operating results would be materially adversely affected.

We are positioning
ourselves to address the increasing demand for higher density data optimized Flash memory by offering products based on our MirrorBit ORNAND architecture, which we recently developed. The success of our MirrorBit ORNAND architecture requires that we
timely and cost effectively develop, manufacture and market MirrorBit ORNAND-based products that are competitive with NAND-based Flash memory products. We began production of MirrorBit ORNAND-based products in the first quarter of fiscal 2006.
However, if we fail to develop and commercialize additional products based on our MirrorBit ORNAND architecture on a timely basis or if our MirrorBit ORNAND-based products fail to achieve acceptance in the market, our future operating results would
be materially adversely affected.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

The loss of a significant customer for our Flash memory products in the mobile phone market could
have a material adverse effect on us.

Sales of our products are dependent to a large extent on demand for mobile phones.
Historically, a small number of wireless Flash memory customers have driven a substantial portion of our net sales. If one of these customers decided to stop buying our Flash memory products, or if one of these customers were materially to reduce
its operations or its demand for our products, we could be materially adversely affected.

We have a substantial amount of
indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial position.

We currently have and will continue to have for the foreseeable
future, a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of July 2, 2006, we had an aggregate principal amount of approximately $619 million in outstanding debt.

Our substantial indebtedness may:



| |  |  | require us to use a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations to make debt service payments;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | make it difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | limit our ability to use our cash flows or obtain additional financing for future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate purposes;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | limit our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business and industry;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our less leveraged competitors; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | increase our vulnerability to the impact of adverse economic and industry conditions.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We are currently party to and intend to enter into debt arrangements in the future, each of which may subject us to restrictive covenants which could limit our ability to operate our business.

We are party to a $175 million senior secured revolving credit facility that imposes various restrictions and covenants on us that
limit our ability to:



| |  |  | enter into any mergers, consolidations or sales of property, or sales of inventory, equipment and assets except in the ordinary course of business;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | make any distributions except for distributions from Spansion LLC to us in specified circumstances;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | make investments, except for the purchase of inventory, equipment and intellectual property in the ordinary course of business, unless we meet minimum liquidity requirements
consisting of availability under the revolving credit facility and domestic cash of at least $200 million, provided, however, that investments are limited to no more than a total of $50 million while the reduced minimum liquidity requirement is in
place;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | incur additional debt other than the debt incurred concurrently with our initial public offering, capital leases, debt incurred by our foreign subsidiaries, and in limited cases,
loans to subsidiaries;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | engage in transactions with affiliates unless in the normal course of business, negotiated at arms-length terms and the transactions are disclosed to the agent for the lenders;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | incur any new liens except for equipment leases and loans; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | prepay any debt, except that debt of foreign subsidiaries may be prepaid by the applicable foreign subsidiary and we may prepay any debt as long as after such repayment, we meet
minimum liquidity requirements consisting of availability under the revolving credit facility plus domestic cash of at least $250 million.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



37



---

##### Table of Contents

In addition, the indentures governing our $250 million principal amount of 11.25% Senior Notes due 2016
and our $207 million principal amount of 2.25% Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2016 impose substantially similar restrictions and covenants on us which could limit our ability to respond to market conditions, make capital investments
or take advantage of business opportunities. Moreover, the senior notes bear a higher rate of interest than our bank debt, which will adversely affect our results of operations.

In the future, we may incur additional indebtedness through arrangements such as credit agreements or term loans that may also impose similar
restrictions and covenants. These restrictions and covenants limit and any future covenants and restrictions likely will limit our ability to respond to market conditions, to make capital investments or to take advantage of business opportunities.
Any debt arrangements we enter into would likely require us to make regular interest payments, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

As of July 2, 2006, we were in compliance with the financial covenants under our debt instruments. However, we cannot assure you that in the future we will be able to satisfy the covenants, financial tests and
ratios of our debt instruments, which can be affected by events beyond our control. For example, as of December 25, 2005, Spansion Japan was not in compliance with certain financial covenants under its debt instruments, but obtained waivers
from the other parties. A breach of any of the covenants, financial tests or ratios under our debt instruments could result in a default under the applicable agreement, which in turn could trigger cross-defaults under our other debt instruments, any
of which would materially adversely affect us.

Our inability to design and implement new enterprise-wide information systems in a
timely and cost-effective manner could materially adversely affect us.

We are in the process of designing and implementing our own
enterprise-wide information systems. These systems will be designed to automate more fully our business processes and will affect most of our functional areas including sales, finance, procurement, inventory control, collections, order processing
and manufacturing. Implementation of this information system is particularly difficult since our systems have historically been integrated into AMDs systems and we are simultaneously undergoing a physical separation from AMDs systems,
attempting to enhance our business processes and implementing a new information system. Implementation also may require significant upgrades to our existing computer hardware and software systems. Historically, other companies have experienced
substantial delays in the implementation of such information systems. Implementation of these information systems is complex, expensive and time consuming and successful implementation could be delayed or otherwise adversely affected by various
factors including: (i) any failure to provide adequate training to employees; (ii) any failure to retain key members of the implementation team or to find suitable replacements for such personnel; (iii) any failure to develop and
apply appropriate testing procedures that accurately reflect the demands that will be placed on these information systems following implementation; and (iv) any failure to develop and implement adequate back-up systems and procedures in the
event that difficulties or delays arise during or following the implementation of these information systems.

In connection with the
implementation of these information systems, we may experience functional and performance problems, including problems relating to the information systems response time and data integrity. In addition, resolution of any such problems could
entail significant additional costs. We cannot assure you that we will be able to implement these information systems successfully or on a timely basis and in a cost-effective manner or that these information systems will not fail or prove to be
unsuitable for our needs. Our inability to implement or resolve problems with these information systems in a timely and cost-effective manner could materially adversely affect us.



38



---

##### Table of Contents

If we cannot generate sufficient operating cash flows and obtain external financing, we may be
unable to make all of our planned capital expenditures.

Our ability to fund anticipated capital expenditures depends on generating
sufficient cash flows from operations and the availability of external financing. For example, we plan to spend approximately $1.2 billion over three years commencing with fiscal 2006 to construct and equip our planned flash memory manufacturing
facility in Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan (SP1). In addition, in fiscal 2006, we expect our capital expenditures to be approximately $650 to $800 million, which amount includes a portion of the costs for SP1. Our capital expenditures, together with ongoing
operating expenses, will be a substantial drain on our cash flows and may decrease our cash balances. The timing and amount of our capital requirements cannot be precisely determined at this time and will depend on a number of factors, including
demand for our products, product mix, changes in industry conditions and market competition.

We may assess markets for external financing
opportunities, including debt and equity. Such financing may not be available when needed or, if available, may not be available on satisfactory terms. Any equity financing would cause further dilution to our stockholders. Our inability to obtain
needed financing or to generate sufficient cash from operations may require us to abandon projects or curtail capital expenditures. If we cannot generate sufficient operating cash flows or obtain external financing, we may be delayed in achieving,
or may not achieve, such capacity, and we could be materially adversely affected.

If our cost reduction efforts are not effective,
our business could be materially adversely affected.

We incurred a net loss in each of fiscal 2003, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005 of
approximately $129 million, $20 million and $304 million, and a net loss in the first six months of fiscal 2006 of approximately $101 million. As a result, we continue to undertake actions in an effort to significantly reduce our expenses. These
actions include and have included streamlining operations, continuing to align manufacturing utilization to our level of demand, controlling increasing testing costs and working with AMD and Fujitsu to reduce costs under our service agreements with
them. We cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve anticipated cost reductions. If our cost reduction efforts are unsuccessful, we will be materially adversely affected.

If we fail to successfully develop, introduce and commercialize new products and technologies or to accelerate our product development cycle, we
may be materially adversely affected.

Our success depends to a significant extent on the development, qualification, production,
introduction and acceptance of new product designs and improvements that provide value to Flash memory customers. We must also be able to accomplish this process at a faster pace than we currently do. Our ability to develop and qualify new products
and related technologies to meet evolving industry requirements, at prices acceptable to our customers and on a timely basis are significant factors in determining our competitiveness in our target markets. If we are delayed in developing or
qualifying new products or technologies, we could be materially adversely affected. For example, during the second half of fiscal 2004 and the first quarter of fiscal 2005, we experienced a delay in qualifying and introducing a new Flash memory
product based on our MirrorBit technology for wireless Flash memory customers. The delay, which was due to our having to re-design the product in order to achieve higher performance specifications under all temperature conditions, contributed to
lower than anticipated net sales during the second half of fiscal 2004 and the first six months of fiscal 2005 and caused us to lose market share. We began delivering a version of this product in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, and we began
delivering our



39



---

##### Table of Contents

new, higher performance version of the product by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2005. In addition, we are
currently in the process of transitioning a majority of our products from floating gate technology to MirrorBit technology. If we experience any substantial difficulty with this transition, we will be materially adversely affected.

The Flash memory market is highly cyclical and has experienced severe downturns that have materially adversely affected, and may in the future
materially adversely affect, our business.

The Flash memory market is highly cyclical and has experienced severe downturns, often
as a result of wide fluctuations in supply and demand, constant and rapid technological change, continuous new product introductions and price erosion. Our financial performance has been, and may in the future be, adversely affected by these
downturns. We have incurred substantial losses in recent downturns, due principally to:



| |  |  | substantial declines in average selling prices, particularly due to aggressive pricing by competitors and an imbalance in product supply and demand;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | a decline in demand for end-user products that incorporate our products; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | less than expected demand in the distribution channels such as by mobile phone OEMs in China.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For example, our net sales in fiscal 2005 decreased from fiscal 2004. Similarly, our net sales in the second half of fiscal 2004 decreased significantly
compared to the first half of fiscal 2004. Net sales in the second half of fiscal 2004 were also adversely affected by a decrease in demand from the mobile phone market and several events that occurred in the first half of fiscal 2004, such as
excess inventory accumulation by mobile phone OEMs in China and our inability to meet demand for some of our lower density products for embedded Flash memory customers. This inability to meet demand adversely impacted our relationship with these
customers and our competitors were able to take advantage of this situation to increase their market share.

Also, during 2005 and the
first quarter of 2006, average selling prices for our products decreased. If our net sales or average selling prices decline in the future, or if these or other similar conditions continue or occur again in the future, we would likely be materially
adversely affected.

Manufacturing capacity constraints may adversely affect us.

There may be situations in which our manufacturing capacity is inadequate to meet the demand for some of our products. For example, in the first half of
fiscal 2004, we were not able to meet demand for some of our lower density products for embedded Flash memory customers because in fiscal 2003 we underestimated demand for these products, and were unable to install additional wafer fabrication
capacity on a timely basis. We believe this adversely impacted our relationships with customers who received reduced allocations, or did not receive allocations, of our embedded products and our competitors were able to take advantage of this
situation to increase their market share in the second half of fiscal 2004. More recently, in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2005, we experienced capacity constraints for final test and assembly of some of our products. While we have worked
internally and with subcontractors to increase capacity to meet anticipated demand, we cannot assure you that we will not experience similar constraints in the future. These capacity constraints limit our ability to respond to rapid and short-term
surges in demand for our products. If we are unable to obtain sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet anticipated demand, either in our own facilities or through foundry, subcontractor or similar arrangements with third parties, or if we are
unable to obtain foundry services at competitive rates, our business may be materially adversely affected.



40



---

##### Table of Contents

Industry overcapacity could require us to lower our prices and have a material adverse effect on
us.

Semiconductor companies with their own manufacturing facilities and specialist semiconductor foundries, which are
subcontractors that manufacture semiconductors designed by others, have added significant capacity in recent years and are expected to continue to do so. In the past, capacity additions sometimes exceeded demand requirements leading to oversupply
situations and downturns in the industry. Fluctuations in the growth rate of industry capacity relative to the growth rate in demand for Flash memory products contribute to cyclicality in the Flash memory market, which may in the future negatively
impact our average selling prices and materially adversely affect us.

Industry overcapacity could cause us to under-utilize our
manufacturing capacity and have a material adverse effect on us.

It is difficult to predict future growth or decline in the markets
we serve, making it very difficult to estimate requirements for production capacity. If our target markets do not grow as we anticipate, we may under-utilize our manufacturing capacity. This may result in write-downs or write-offs of inventories and
losses on products whose demand is lower than we anticipate. In addition, during periods of industry overcapacity, such as we have recently experienced, customers do not generally order products as far in advance of the scheduled shipment date as
they do during periods when our industry is operating closer to capacity, which can exacerbate the difficulty in forecasting capacity requirements.

Many of our costs are fixed. Accordingly, during periods in which we under-utilize our manufacturing capacity as a result of reduced demand for some of our products, our costs cannot be reduced in proportion to the reduced revenues for such
periods. When this occurs, our operating results are materially adversely affected.

Our business has been characterized by average
selling prices that decline over relatively short time periods, which can negatively affect our results of operations unless we are able to reduce our costs or introduce new products with higher average selling prices.

Average selling prices for our products historically have declined over relatively short time periods. Although during the second quarter of 2006 our
average selling prices had a very small increase over the first quarter of fiscal 2006, in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, our average selling prices decreased by approximately four percent compared with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005. In the
third quarter of fiscal 2005, our average selling prices decreased by approximately three percent compared with the second quarter of fiscal 2005. In the second quarter of fiscal 2005, our average selling prices decreased by approximately five
percent compared with the first quarter of fiscal 2005. In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, our average selling prices decreased by approximately 17 percent compared with the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, and in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004,
our average selling prices decreased by approximately seven percent compared with the third quarter of fiscal 2004. We are unable to predict pricing conditions for any future periods. Even in the absence of downturns or oversupply in the industry,
average selling prices of our products have decreased during the products lives, and we expect this trend to continue. When our average selling prices decline, our net sales and net income decline unless we are able to compensate by selling
more units, reducing our manufacturing costs or introducing new, higher margin products with higher densities and/or advanced features. We have experienced declining average selling prices in the past, and we expect that we will continue to
experience them in the future, although we cannot predict when they may occur or how severe they will be. If our average selling prices continue to decline, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.



41



---

##### Table of Contents

Our historical financial results may not be indicative of our future performance as an independent
company.

Our historical financial information does not necessarily indicate what our results of operations, financial condition or
cash flows will be in the future. After our reorganization as Spansion LLC and prior to our initial public offering, we were a majority-owned subsidiary of AMD, and we sold all of our products to our sole distributors, AMD and Fujitsu, who in turn
sold our products to customers worldwide. Upon our initial public offering, we became an independent company. Since that time, we have been transitioning our sales processes so that we are able to sell our products directly to AMDs former
customers and customers not served solely by Fujitsu. We are also expanding our administrative functions and reducing our reliance on AMDs provision of administrative services. If we cannot successfully reduce our reliance on AMD and Fujitsu
as we continue to operate as an independent company, we may be materially adversely affected.

Intense competition in the Flash
memory market could materially adversely affect us.

Our principal competitors in the Flash memory market are Intel Corporation,
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., STMicroelectronics, Silicon Storage Technology, Inc., Macronix International Co., Ltd., Toshiba Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corp., Renesas Technology Corp. Micron Technology and Hynix Semiconductor. The Flash memory
market is characterized by intense competition. The basis of competition is cost, selling price, performance, quality and customer relationships. In particular, in the past, our competitors have aggressively priced their products in order to
increase market share, which resulted in decreased average selling prices for our products in the second half of fiscal 2004 and the first quarter of fiscal 2005 and adversely impacted our results of operations. Some of our competitors, including
Intel, Samsung, STMicroelectronics, Toshiba, Sharp and Renesas, are more diversified than us and may be able to sustain lower operating margins in their Flash memory business based on the profitability of their other, non-Flash memory businesses. In
addition, recent capital investments by competitors have resulted in substantial industry manufacturing capacity, which may further contribute to a competitive pricing environment.

We expect competition in the market for Flash memory devices to increase as existing manufacturers introduce new products, new manufacturers enter the
market, industry-wide production capacity increases and competitors aggressively price their Flash memory products to increase market share. Competition also may increase if NOR memory vendors merge, if NAND memory vendors acquire NOR businesses or
other NAND businesses, or if our competitors otherwise consolidate their operations. Furthermore, we face increasing competition from NAND Flash memory vendors in some portions of the integrated Flash memory market. We believe, however, that our
ORNAND architecture based on MirrorBit technology and our plans to continue to transition to more advanced process technologies will enable us to compete against NAND Flash memory vendors. If we are unable to compete effectively using our MirrorBit
ORNAND architecture, successfully continue to transition to more advanced process technologies or grow our position in the Flash memory market, we could be materially adversely affected. To compete successfully, we must decrease our manufacturing
costs and develop, introduce and sell products that meet the increasing demand for greater Flash memory content in mobile phones, consumer electronics and automotive applications, among other markets, at competitive prices.

Competitors may introduce new memory technologies that may make our Flash memory products uncompetitive or obsolete.

Competitors are working on a number of new technologies, including FRAM, MRAM, polymer and phase-change based memory technologies. If successfully
developed and commercialized as a viable alternative to Flash memory, these technologies could pose a



42



---

##### Table of Contents

competitive threat to a number of Flash memory companies, including us. Also, we and some of our competitors have
licensed Flash memory technology called NROM technology from a third party. NROM technology has characteristics similar to our MirrorBit technology which may allow these competitors to develop new Flash memory technology that is competitive with our
MirrorBit technology.

If we are unable to diversify our customer base, we could be materially adversely affected.

We serve our customers worldwide directly through our sales force and indirectly through our distributors, who purchase products
from us and sell them to customers, either directly or through their distributors. Our customers consist of original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, original design manufacturers, or ODMs, and contract manufacturers. In fiscal 2005 and the first
six months of fiscal 2006, the five largest of these customers accounted for a significant portion of end sales of our products. Our business strategy is to continue to maintain and increase our market share and diversify our customer base in the
integrated category of the Flash memory market. Specifically, we intend to increase our sales to embedded Flash memory customers in part by expanding the number of customers who buy through our distribution channel as well as the number of customers
in emerging markets. If we are unsuccessful in executing this strategy, we could be materially adversely affected.

We cannot be
certain that our substantial investments in research and development will lead to timely improvements in technology or that we will have sufficient resources to invest in the level of research and development that is required to remain competitive.

We make substantial investments in research and development for design and process technologies in an effort to design and
manufacture advanced Flash memory products. For example, in the first six months of fiscal 2006, our research and development expenses were $176 million, or approximately 14 percent of our net sales. In fiscal 2005, our research and development
expenses were $296 million, or approximately 15 percent of our net sales. Of this amount, we incurred $32 million of expenses related to research and development services provided by AMD and Fujitsu. In fiscal 2004, our research and development
expenses were $281 million, or approximately 12 percent of our net sales. Of this amount we incurred $54 million of expenses related to research and development services provided by AMD and Fujitsu.

Currently, we are developing new non-volatile memory process technologies, including 65-nanometer and 45-nanometer process technologies. Our SDC facility
is developing manufacturing process technologies on 200-millimeter and 300-millimeter wafers. We cannot assure you that we will have sufficient resources to maintain the level of investment in research and development that is required for us to
remain competitive, which could materially adversely affect us. Further, we cannot assure you that our investments in research and development will result in increased sales or competitive advantage, which could adversely affect our operating
results.

If we are unable to timely and efficiently expand our manufacturing capacity to implement 300-millimeter wafer capacity in
SP1, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

We intend to expand our
manufacturing capacity to produce approximately 15,000 to 20,000 300-millimeter wafers per month at SP1, which is the flash memory fabrication facility we plan to construct in Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan. Our goal is to have this 300-millimeter wafer
capacity in place by fiscal 2008. We estimate that it will cost us an aggregate of approximately $1.2 billion over three years commencing fiscal 2006 to construct and equip SP1. However, the actual cost and capacity achieved will vary depending on
various factors, including available financing and future product demand. Financing for the construction of and equipment for SP1 may not be available when needed or, if available, may not be available on satisfactory terms. If



43



---

##### Table of Contents

we do not achieve our desired capacity at the anticipated cost, or if we cannot obtain suitable financing, we may be
delayed in achieving, or may not achieve, such capacity, and we could be materially adversely affected.

The timing for implementing
300-millimeter capacity in SP1 will also depend in part on our ability to execute our plan for constructing and equipping the facility and other factors that may be beyond our control, such as delivery schedules for the required machinery and
equipment and construction schedules. If we are delayed in implementing this capability or are unable to obtain foundry services at competitive rates or to timely and efficiently ramp production on 300-millimeter wafers, we will not achieve
anticipated cost savings associated with this technology and our gross margins could decline. Even if we are successful in implementing this capacity, but the demand for our products is not strong enough to support the additional capacity when it
becomes available, we could be materially and adversely affected.

Unless we maintain manufacturing efficiency, our future
profitability could be materially adversely affected.

The Flash memory industry is characterized by rapid technological changes.
For example, new manufacturing process technologies using smaller feature sizes and offering better performance characteristics are generally introduced every one to two years. The introduction of new manufacturing process technologies allows us to
increase the functionality of our products while at the same time optimizing performance parameters, decreasing power consumption and/or increasing storage capacity. In addition, the reduction of feature sizes enables us to produce smaller chips
offering the same functionality and thereby considerably reduces the costs per bit. In order to remain competitive, it is essential that we secure the capabilities to develop and qualify new manufacturing process technologies. For example, our Flash
memory products must be manufactured at 90-nanometer and more advanced process technologies and on 300-millimeter wafers. If we are delayed in transitioning to these technologies and other future technologies, we could be materially adversely
affected.

Manufacturing our products involves highly complex processes that require advanced equipment. Our manufacturing efficiency is an
important factor in our profitability, and we cannot be sure that we will be able to maintain or increase our manufacturing efficiency to the same extent as our competitors. For example, we continuously modify our manufacturing processes in an
effort to improve yields and product performance and decrease costs. We are currently transitioning to 90-nanometer process technology for the manufacture of some of our products. During periods when we are implementing new process technologies,
manufacturing facilities may not be fully productive. We may fail to achieve acceptable yields or may experience product delivery delays as a result of, among other things, capacity constraints, delays in the development of new process technologies,
changes in our process technologies, upgrades or expansion of existing facilities, impurities or other difficulties in the manufacturing process.

Improving our manufacturing efficiency in future periods is dependent on our ability to:



| |  |  | develop advanced process technologies and advanced products that utilize those technologies;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | successfully transition to 90-nanometer and more advanced process technologies;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | ramp product and process technology improvements rapidly and effectively to commercial volumes across our facilities; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | achieve acceptable levels of manufacturing wafer output and yields, which may decrease as we implement more advanced technologies.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



44



---

##### Table of Contents

If we cannot adequately protect our technology or other intellectual property in the United States
and abroad, through patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks and other measures, we may lose a competitive advantage and incur significant expenses.

We rely on a combination of protections provided by contracts, including confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements, copyrights, patents, trademarks and common law rights, such as trade secrets, to protect our
intellectual property. However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately protect our technology or other intellectual property from third-party infringement or from misappropriation in the United States and abroad. Any patent owned or
licensed by us or issued to us could be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or rights granted under these patents or licenses may not provide a competitive advantage to us. Furthermore, patent applications that we file may not result in issuance
of a patent or, if a patent is issued, the patent may not be issued in a form that is advantageous to us. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights, others may independently develop similar products, duplicate our products or
design around our patents and other rights. In addition, it is difficult to monitor compliance with, and enforce, our intellectual property on a worldwide basis in a cost-effective manner. Foreign laws may provide less intellectual property
protection than afforded in the United States. If we cannot adequately protect our technology or other intellectual property in the United States and abroad, we may be materially adversely affected.

We are party to intellectual property litigation and may become party to other intellectual property claims or litigation that could cause us to
incur substantial costs or pay substantial damages or prohibit us from selling our products.

From time to time, we may be notified,
or third parties may bring actions against us based on allegations, that we are infringing the intellectual property rights of others. If any such claims are asserted against us, we may seek to obtain a license under the third partys
intellectual property rights. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain all of the necessary licenses on satisfactory terms, if at all. In the event that we cannot obtain a license, these parties may file lawsuits against us seeking
damages (potentially including treble damages) or an injunction against the sale of our products that incorporate allegedly infringed intellectual property or against the operation of our business as presently conducted, which could result in our
having to stop the sale of some of our products, increase the costs of selling some of our products, or cause damage to our reputation. The award of damages, including material royalty payments, or the entry of an injunction against the manufacture
and sale of some or all of our products, would have a material adverse effect on us. We could decide, in the alternative, to redesign our products or to resort to litigation to challenge or defend such claims.

For example, Tessera, Inc. filed a lawsuit against us alleging that we have infringed certain of Tesseras patents. Tessera has sought to enjoin
such alleged infringement and to recover an unspecified amount of damages. In addition, Fujitsu has informed us that it has been informed by Texas Instruments Inc. that Texas Instruments believes that several of our products infringe some of Texas
Instruments patents. Fujitsu has also informed us that it expects us to defend and indemnify Fujitsu against Texas Instruments claims in accordance with the terms of our distribution agreement with Fujitsu. Defending these claims and
similar claims could be extremely expensive and time-consuming and defending these claims or others or the award of damages or an injunction could have a material adverse effect on us. We cannot assure you that litigation related to the intellectual
property rights of ours or others can be avoided or will be successfully concluded.

We may not be successful in establishing a brand
identity.

We have used the brand name of Spansion only since June 30, 2003. Prior to that time, all Flash memory
products were sold under either AMDs or Fujitsus brand. AMDs and Fujitsus brand names are well known by Flash memory customers, suppliers and potential employees. We



45



---

##### Table of Contents

will need to expend significant time, effort and resources to continue to establish our brand name in the marketplace. We
cannot guarantee that this effort will ultimately be successful. If we are unsuccessful in continuing to establish our brand identity, we may be materially adversely affected.

If essential equipment or materials are not available to manufacture our products, we could be materially adversely affected.

Our manufacturing operations depend upon obtaining deliveries of equipment and adequate supplies of materials on a timely basis. We purchase equipment
and materials from a number of suppliers. From time to time, suppliers may extend lead times, limit supply to us or increase prices due to capacity constraints or other factors. Because the equipment that we purchase is complex, it is difficult for
us to substitute one supplier for another or one piece of equipment for another. Some raw materials we use in the manufacture of our products are available from a limited number of suppliers. We rely on purchasing commercial memory die from
third-party suppliers to incorporate these die into multi-chip package, or MCP, products. The availability of these third-party purchased commercial die is subject to market availability, and the process technology roadmaps and manufacturing
capacities of our vendors. For example, our production was constrained in the first half of fiscal 2004 because of difficulties in procuring adequate supply of pSRAM. In addition, some of our major suppliers, including Samsung, are also our
competitors. Interruption of supply from a competitor that is a supplier or otherwise or increased demand in the industry could cause shortages and price increases in various essential materials. If we are unable to procure these materials, we may
have to reduce our manufacturing operations. Such a reduction has in the past had and could in the future have a material adverse effect on us.

Our inability to continue to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel could impact our business.

Our future
success depends upon the continued service of numerous qualified engineering, manufacturing, marketing and executive personnel. We cannot assure you that our equity incentive plan or our employee benefit plans or the performance of our management
system will be effective in motivating or retaining our employees or attracting new employees. Competition for qualified employees among companies that rely heavily on engineering and technology is intense, and the loss of qualified employees or an
inability to attract, retain and motivate additional highly skilled employees could materially adversely affect us.

Costs related to
defective products could have a material adverse effect on us.

One or more of our products may be found to be defective after the
product has been shipped to customers in volume. The cost of product replacements or product returns may be substantial, and our reputation with our customers would be damaged. In addition, we could incur substantial costs to implement modifications
to fix defects. Any of these problems could materially adversely affect us.

Uncertainties involving the ordering of our products
could materially adversely affect us.

Flash memory suppliers compete in part on the basis of their ability to deliver products to
end customers on short lead times and it is common for prevailing lead times in the market to be shorter than the minimum manufacturing cycle time. To deliver products with competitive lead times, we must maintain a buffer stock of product to
fulfill customer orders. Because our buffer stock must be produced before customer orders are received, our production levels are based on forecasts of customer demand. Generally, we sell our products pursuant to individual purchase orders from our
direct customers, distributors and our distributors customers. Generally, these customers and distributors may cancel their orders for standard products thirty days prior to shipment without incurring a significant penalty.



46



---

##### Table of Contents

Customer demand for our products may be difficult to predict because such customers may change their
inventory practices on short notice for any reason or they may cancel or defer product orders. Inaccurate forecasts of customer demand or cancellation or deferral of product orders could result in excess or obsolete inventory, which could result in
write-downs of inventory. Because market conditions are uncertain, we could be materially adversely affected if we are unable to accurately predict demand for our products.

We may not achieve the sales that are suggested by our book-to-bill ratio.

Our book-to-bill ratio is a demand-to-supply ratio for orders, which we calculate by dividing the value of orders booked during a fiscal quarter by the
value of orders invoiced during that quarter. We determine bookings based on orders that are received. However, the rate of booking new orders can vary significantly from month to month as demand for our products fluctuates frequently and orders may
be cancelled or delayed. For these reasons, our book-to-bill ratio should not be relied on as an indication of future sales.

Unfavorable currency exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect us.

As a result of our foreign operations, we
have sales, costs, assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Japanese yen. For example:



| |  |  | some of our manufacturing costs are denominated in yen, Chinese renminbi and other foreign currencies such as the Thai baht and Malaysian ringgit;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | some of the sales of our products to Fujitsu are denominated in Japanese yen; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | some fixed asset purchases are denominated in Japanese yen and European Union euros.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We recently began selling directly to customers previously served by AMD, and we expect to also have sales denominated in European Union euro. As a consequence, movements in exchange rates could cause our U.S.
dollar-denominated expenses to increase as a percentage of net sales, affecting our profitability and cash flows. Whenever we believe appropriate, we cover a portion of our foreign currency exchange exposure to protect against fluctuations in
currency exchange rates. As of July 2, 2006, we did not have any foreign currency forward exchange contracts, due in part to a natural netting of exposures. We would expect to have some outstanding foreign exchange contracts in future quarters.
Generally, we cover only a portion of our foreign currency exchange exposure. Moreover, we determine our total foreign currency exchange exposure using projections of long-term expenditures for items such as equipment and materials used in
manufacturing. We cannot assure you that these activities will be successful in reducing our foreign exchange rate exposure. Failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on us.

Worldwide economic and political conditions may adversely affect demand for our products.

Worldwide economic conditions may adversely affect demand for our products. For example, Chinas economy has been growing at a fast pace over the
past several years, and the Chinese government introduced various measures to slow down the pace of economic growth. We believe some of these measures negatively impacted demand for our Flash memory products in the second half of fiscal 2004. A
decline in economic conditions in China could lead to declining worldwide economic conditions. If economic conditions decline, whether in China or worldwide, we could be materially adversely affected.

Our consolidated financial results could also be significantly and adversely affected by geopolitical concerns and world events, such as wars and
terrorist attacks. Our revenues and financial results have been and could be negatively affected to the extent geopolitical concerns continue and similar events occur or are anticipated to occur. In particular, consequences of



47



---

##### Table of Contents

military action in the Middle East have in the past, and may in the future, adversely affect demand for our products and
our relationship with various third parties with which we collaborate. In addition, terrorist attacks may negatively affect our operations, directly or indirectly, and such attacks or related armed conflicts may directly impact our physical
facilities or those of our suppliers or customers. Furthermore, these attacks may make travel and the transportation of our products more difficult and more expensive, which could materially adversely affect us.

The United States has been and may continue to be involved in armed conflicts that could have a further impact on our sales and our supply chain.
Political and economic instability in some regions of the world may also result and could negatively impact our business. The consequences of armed conflicts are unpredictable, and we may not be able to foresee events that could have a material
adverse effect on us. More generally, any of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the U.S. economy and worldwide financial markets. Any of these occurrences could have a material
adverse effect on us.

Our operations in foreign countries are subject to political and economic risks, which could have a material
adverse effect on us.

The majority of our wafer fabrication capacity is located in Japan and nearly all final test and assembly of
our products is performed at our facilities in China, Malaysia and Thailand and by third parties in Taiwan and Japan. In addition, we have international sales operations and, as part of our business strategy, we are continuing to seek to expand our
product sales in high growth markets.

The political and economic risks associated with our sales to and operations in foreign countries
include:



| |  |  | expropriation;
| | - |  | --------------



| |  |  | changes in political or economic conditions;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in tax laws, trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | difficulties in protecting our intellectual property;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | difficulties in achieving headcount reductions;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------



| |  |  | restrictions on transfers of funds and other assets of our subsidiaries between jurisdictions;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in freight and interest rates;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | disruption in air transportation between the United States and our overseas facilities; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | loss or modification of exemptions for taxes and tariffs.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------

Any conflict or uncertainty in the countries in which we operate, including public health or safety concerns, natural disasters or general economic factors, could have a material adverse effect on our business. Any of the above risks,
should they occur, could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are subject to a variety of environmental laws that could result
in liabilities.

Our operations and properties are subject to various U.S., Japanese, European and other foreign environmental laws
and regulations, including those relating to materials used in our products and manufacturing processes, discharge of pollutants into the environment, the



48



---

##### Table of Contents

treatment, transport, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes, and remediation of contamination. These laws
and regulations require us to obtain permits for our operations, including the discharge of air pollutants and wastewater. From time to time, our facilities are subject to investigation by governmental regulators. We cannot assure you that we have
been or will be at all times in complete compliance with such laws, regulations and permits. If we violate or fail to comply with any of them, a range of consequences could result, including fines, suspension of production, alteration of
manufacturing processes, sales limitations, criminal and civil liabilities or other sanctions. We could also be held liable for any and all consequences arising out of exposure to hazardous materials used, stored, released, disposed of by us or
located at or under our facilities or other environmental or natural resource damage.

Certain environmental laws, including the U.S.
Comprehensive, Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, or the Superfund Act, impose strict, joint and several liability on current and previous owners or operators of real property for the cost of removal or remediation of
hazardous substances and impose liability for damages to natural resources. These laws often impose liability even if the owner or operator did not know of, or was not responsible for, the release of such hazardous substances. These environmental
laws also assess liability on persons who arrange for hazardous substances to be sent to disposal or treatment facilities when such facilities are found to be contaminated. Such persons can be responsible for cleanup costs even if they never owned
or operated the contaminated facility. Two of our manufacturing sites are, or are located within, a federal Superfund site. Although we have not yet been, we could be named a potentially responsible party at these or other Superfund or other
contaminated sites in the future. The costs associated with such sites could be material. In addition, contamination that has not yet been identified could exist at our other facilities.

Environmental laws are complex, change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. For example, the European Union recently began
imposing stricter requirements regarding reduced lead content in semiconductor packaging. While we have budgeted for foreseeable environmental expenditures, we cannot assure you that environmental laws will not change or become more stringent in the
future. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our costs of complying with current and future environmental and health and safety laws, and our liabilities arising from past or future releases of, or exposure to, hazardous substances will not have a
material adverse effect on us.

Our worldwide operations and the operations of our suppliers could be subject to natural disasters
and other business disruptions, which could harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses.

Our worldwide operations could be subject to natural disasters and other business disruptions, which could harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses. For example, our corporate headquarters are
located near major earthquake fault lines in California, and three of our four wafer fabrication facilities are located near major earthquake fault lines in Japan. In addition, our assembly and test facilities are located in China, Malaysia and
Thailand and may be subject to tsunamis. In the event of a major earthquake, tsunami or other natural or manmade disaster, we could experience loss of life of our employees, destruction of facilities or other business interruptions, any of which
could materially adversely affect us.

Furthermore, the operations of our raw material suppliers could be subject to natural disasters and
other business disruptions, which could cause shortages and price increases in various essential raw materials, such as liquid hydrogen, which are required to manufacture our products. If we are unable to procure an adequate supply of raw materials
that are required for us to manufacture our products, or if the operations of our other suppliers of such raw materials are affected by natural disasters or business disruptions, we may have to reduce our manufacturing operations. Such a reduction
could in the future have a material adverse effect on us.



49



---

##### Table of Contents

We may be delayed or prevented from taking actions that require the consent of AMD and Fujitsu,
whose interests may differ from or conflict with our interests or those of our other stockholders, which could decrease the value of your shares.

Our bylaws provide that for so long as AMD or Fujitsu maintains specified ownership levels in our common stock, we will not be able to take the following actions without the prior consent of AMD and Fujitsu:



| |  |  | enter into any joint venture, strategic alliance or similar arrangement:
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | with an integrated electronics manufacturer having the majority of its assets or business operations in Japan and annual semiconductor revenue in excess of one hundred billion yen;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | prior to June 30, 2007, relating to manufacturing, memory product design or complimentary metal oxide semiconductor, or CMOS, product development that involves actual or
potential contribution of cash or assets by us to such joint venture or to a third party exceeding $50 million in any fiscal year or $250 million in the aggregate over the life of the joint venture or arrangement, excluding arrangements for
providing foundry services with entities that derive more than 75 percent of their revenue from foundry services or arrangements for the assembly, pack, mark and test of semiconductor devices; or
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | relating to activities unrelated to manufacturing, memory product design or CMOS process development that involve the actual or potential contribution of cash or assets by us
exceeding $200 million in any fiscal year or $1 billion in the aggregate over the life of the joint venture or arrangement;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

for so long as AMDs or Fujitsus aggregate ownership interest is at least 22.5 percent;



| |  |  | engage in or undertake any material activity unrelated to our current Flash memory business, for so long as AMDs or Fujitsus aggregate ownership interest is at least 20
percent;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | amend the charter documents of any of our subsidiaries if such amendment would adversely and disproportionately affect either AMD or Fujitsu, for so long as AMDs or
Fujitsus aggregate ownership interest is at least 15 percent;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | amend our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or effect any resolution to wind up Spansion Inc. or any other subsidiary, for so long as AMDs or Fujitsus aggregate
ownership interest is at least ten percent;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | shut down operations at JV3 before April 1, 2007, shut down any facilities of the non-manufacturing organization of our wholly owned subsidiary, Spansion Japan, before
April 1, 2007, shut down operations at JV1 or JV2 before April 1, 2007 without giving AMD and Fujitsu six months advance notice, or shut down operations at our assembly and test facility in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia before April 1, 2007
without giving AMD and Fujitsu three months advance notice, for so long as AMD or Fujitsu owns any shares of our common stock; or
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | reduce headcount at JV1, JV2 or JV3 by more than ten percent prior to April 1, 2007 or reduce headcount at any facilities of the non-manufacturing organization of Spansion
Japan by more than 15 percent prior to April 1, 2007 for so long as AMD or Fujitsu owns any shares of our common stock.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We cannot assure you that the interests of AMD and Fujitsu will be aligned with our interests or those of our other stockholders with respect to such decisions. As a result, we may be



50



---

##### Table of Contents

unable to take steps that we believe are desirable and in the best interests of our stockholders. In addition, these
consent rights could make an acquisition of us more difficult, even if the acquisition may be considered beneficial by some stockholders.

The interests of AMD and Fujitsu, and our directors nominated by them, may differ from or conflict with our interests or those of our other stockholders.

When exercising their rights as our stockholders, either alone or in concert, AMD and Fujitsu may take into account not only our interests but also their
interests and the interests of their other affiliates. Our interests and the interests of AMD and Fujitsu may at times conflict since the growth of our business depends, in part, on successful competition with other semiconductor companies. These
conflicts may result in lost corporate opportunities for us, including opportunities to enter into lines of business that may overlap with those pursued by AMD and Fujitsu. We may not be able to resolve any potential conflicts, and, even if we do
so, the resolution may be less favorable to us than if we were dealing with unaffiliated parties.

Various other conflicts of interest
between our two principal stockholders and us may arise in the future in a number of areas relating to our business and relationships, including potential acquisitions of businesses or properties, intellectual property matters, transfers by AMD or
Fujitsu of all or any portion of its ownership interest in us or its other assets, which could be to one of our competitors, indemnity arrangements, service arrangements and business opportunities that may be attractive to AMD, Fujitsu and us.

AMD and Fujitsu are our two largest stockholders. AMD has the right to elect two members to our board of directors. Fujitsu has the right
to elect one member to our board of directors. Each stockholders ability to elect directors is subject to reduction based on the amount of our common stock that they own and this right terminates when their ownership in us falls below ten
percent.

In addition, the directors appointed by AMD and Fujitsu continue to hold positions at AMD and Fujitsu. Individuals who are our
directors and also officers of either AMD or Fujitsu have a duty of care and loyalty to us when acting in their capacities as our directors and a duty of care and loyalty to AMD or Fujitsu when acting as their officers or directors. However, our
certificate of incorporation provides that in the event a director or officer of our company who is also a director or officer of AMD or Fujitsu acquires knowledge of a potential business opportunity that may be deemed a corporate opportunity of our
company and AMD or Fujitsu, such opportunity will belong to AMD or Fujitsu, as applicable, unless it has been expressly offered to such director or officer in writing solely in his or her capacity as a director or officer of our company. Ownership
of AMD common stock, or stock options to acquire AMD common stock by any of our directors and officers could create, or appear to create, potential conflicts of interest when those directors and officers are faced with decisions that could have
different implications for AMD than they do for us.

Third parties may seek to hold us responsible for liabilities of AMD and Fujitsu
that we did not assume in our agreements.

Under our agreements with AMD and Fujitsu, we agreed to assume liabilities related to our
business after June 30, 2003, and liabilities related to our business prior to June 30, 2003 if such liabilities were reflected as accruals or reserves on the AMD and Fujitsu contributed balance sheets. Our assumed liabilities include
claims made with respect to Flash memory products sold after June 30, 2003, even if such products were manufactured prior to June 30, 2003, and warranty claims with respect to products sold prior to June 30, 2003 to the extent such
warranty claims were reflected as accruals or reserves on the AMD and Fujitsu contributed balance sheets. The allocation of assets and liabilities between AMD, Fujitsu and us may not reflect the allocation that would have been reached between
unaffiliated parties and may be less favorable to us as a result. Third parties may seek to hold us responsible for AMDs and Fujitsus retained



51



---

##### Table of Contents

liabilities. If our losses for AMDs and Fujitsus retained liabilities were significant and we were ultimately
held liable for them, we cannot assure you that we would be able to recover the full amount of our losses.

We currently rely on AMD
and Fujitsu for a number of services and our business may suffer if we do not timely and cost-effectively establish our own administrative and support systems.

We currently rely on AMD and Fujitsu for a number of administrative and information technology services. We are in the process of reducing our reliance on AMD and Fujitsu and the services they provide to us.
Accordingly, we are creating our own systems or contracting with other third parties to replace AMD or Fujitsu. However, during the transition period, which could be substantial, we still rely on AMD and Fujitsu for a number of services. Although we
are working with AMD and Fujitsu to reduce the costs under our existing service agreements with them, if we are unable to successfully reduce our costs under these agreements or if we are unable to make this transition to our own systems in a timely
and cost-effective manner, the costs associated with these services may have a material adverse effect on us.

We rely on Fujitsu to
be our sole distributor in Japan.

We currently rely on Fujitsu to act as the sole distributor of our products to customers in
Japan, which in fiscal 2005 was one of our most important geographic markets. Under our distribution agreement with Fujitsu, Fujitsu has agreed to use its best efforts to promote the sale of our products in Japan and to other customers served by
Fujitsu. In the event that we reasonably determine that Fujitsus sales performance in Japan and to those customers served by Fujitsu is not satisfactory based on specified criteria, then we have the right to require Fujitsu to propose and
implement an agreed-upon corrective action plan. If we reasonably believe that the corrective action plan is inadequate, we can take steps to remedy deficiencies ourselves through means that include appointing another distributor as a supplementary
distributor to sell products in Japan and to customers served by Fujitsu. Pursuing these actions would be costly and disruptive to the sales of our products in Japan. If Fujitsus sales performance in Japan were unsatisfactory or if we are
unable to successfully maintain our distribution agreement and relationship with Fujitsu, and we could not timely find a suitable supplementary distributor, we would be materially adversely affected.

We may experience increased costs resulting from decreased purchasing power since we are no longer a majority-owned subsidiary of AMD.

When we were a majority-owned subsidiary of AMD, AMD procured goods, such as raw materials, technology, such as software licenses,
and services on our behalf, and we benefited from AMDs size and purchasing power. Now that we are no longer a majority-owned subsidiary of AMD and we are an independent company, AMD is not able to procure goods, technology and services for us
under AMDs existing agreements with suppliers. Because we are a smaller and less diversified company than AMD is today, and we do not have access to financial and other resources comparable to those of AMD, we may be unable to obtain goods,
technology and services at prices and on terms as favorable as those available to us while we were a majority-owned subsidiary of AMD, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

In addition, AMD relied on third-party providers to deliver our products to customers, to distribute materials for our wafer fabrication facilities and
to provide some information technology services to us, including helpdesk support, desktop application services, business and software support applications, server and storage administration, data center operations, database administration and
voice, video and remote access. We are no longer be a beneficiary under these agreements, and have to renegotiate the terms with these suppliers or bring these capabilities in-house. Vendors may require the payment of additional fees, which could
have a material adverse effect on us.



52



---

##### Table of Contents

AMD and Fujitsu may continue to use all of our intellectual property and the intellectual property
they have transferred to us.

In connection with our reorganization as Spansion LLC in June 2003, AMD and Fujitsu transferred
approximately 400 patents and patent applications to us. In addition, AMD and Fujitsu contributed additional patents to us at the time of our initial public offering. However, both AMD and Fujitsu have retained the rights to use any patents
contributed to us for an unlimited period of time. In addition, under their respective patent cross-license agreements with us, AMD and Fujitsu have also obtained licenses to our present and future patents with effective filing dates prior to the
later of June 30, 2013, or such date on which they have transferred all of their shares in us, although the scope of patents under license can be impacted by a change in control of the parties or their semiconductor groups. These licenses
continue until the last to expire of the patents under license expires. Furthermore, while the cross-license agreements provide AMD and Fujitsu with ongoing perpetual licenses to all of our present and future patents and technologies in existence
through such cross-license termination date, our right to Fujitsus patents and technologies is more limited.

Under our
non-competition agreement, both AMD and Fujitsu have agreed that they will not directly or indirectly engage in a business, and have agreed to divest any acquired business, that manufactures or supplies standalone semiconductor devices (including
single chip, multiple chip or system devices) containing only Flash memory, which is the business in which we primarily compete. With respect to each of AMD and Fujitsu, this non-competition restriction will last until the earlier of (i) two
years from the date such stockholders ownership in us falls below five percent, or (ii) the dissolution of our company. After that time, should it ever decide to re-enter the Flash memory business, AMD or Fujitsu could use on a perpetual
basis our present and future patents and technologies in existence through the cross-license termination date to compete against us. If either AMD or Fujitsu were to compete with us, we could be materially adversely affected.

Our stock price may decline because of the ability of AMD and Fujitsu to sell shares of our common stock.

Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the possibility of those sales, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and
impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional equity securities.

Subject to transfer restrictions described below
to which we are not a beneficiary and any applicable U.S. federal and state securities laws, after the expiration on September 3, 2006, of a 90-day lock-up period (which may be waived by the initial purchasers of our $207 million principal
amount of 2.25% Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2016), AMD and Fujitsu may sell shares of our common stock that they beneficially own. In addition, after the expiration of this 90-day period, we could issue and sell additional shares
of our common stock. Any sale by AMD, Fujitsu or us of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that sales could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock. AMD and Fujitsu have entered into a
stockholders agreement with us, which provides for, among other things, restrictions on their ability to transfer their shares. AMD and Fujitsu have agreed with each other that neither of them will transfer any shares of our common stock, except to
certain affiliates, until the earlier of December 21, 2006 or the conversion of the Class D common stock. In addition, neither stockholder can transfer shares in an amount equal to or greater than one percent of the then common stock
outstanding to any entity whose principal business competes with us, unless first obtaining the written consent of the non-transferring stockholder, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld after June 30, 2007.



53



---

##### Table of Contents

Our stock price may be volatile, and stockholders may be unable to sell their stock at or above the
purchase price.

In December 2005, we had an IPO of our Class A common shares. The initial public offering price for our shares
was determined by negotiations between us and representatives of the underwriters and may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the trading market. The market price of shares of our Class A common stock could be subject to wide
fluctuations in response to many risk factors listed in this section, and others beyond our control, including:



| |  |  | changes in projections of our operating results by securities analysts;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived to be comparable to us; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | stock price and volume fluctuations attributable to inconsistent trading volume levels or other factors.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Furthermore, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of
equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations often have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political and market
conditions such as recessions, interest rate changes or international currency fluctuations, may negatively impact the market price of shares of our Class A common stock. If the market price of shares of our Class A common stock does not
increase, stockholders may not realize any return on their investment in us and may lose some or all of their investment. In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their stock have been subject to securities
class action litigation. We may be the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation against us could result in substantial costs and divert our managements attention from other business concerns, which could
materially adversely affect us.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research reports about our business, or publish
negative reports about our business, the price and trading volume of our securities could decline.

The trading market for our
securities, including the notes sold by Spansion LLC, our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, will depend, in part, on the research reports and ratings that securities or industry analysts or ratings agencies publish about us, our business and the
Flash memory market in general. We do not have any control over these analysts or agencies. If one or more of the analysts or agencies that cover us downgrades us or our securities, the price of our securities may decline. If one or more of these
analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause the price of our securities or trading volume to decline.

Being a public company increases our expenses and administrative burden.

As a public company, we are incurring significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, our
administrative staff is required to perform additional tasks.

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related regulations implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq Stock Market, are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and
financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments



54



---

##### Table of Contents

with respect to new and proposed rules and cannot predict or estimate the amount of the additional costs we may incur or
the timing of such costs. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided
by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with
evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of managements time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our
efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our
business may be harmed.

We currently do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock and, consequently, our stockholders
only opportunity to achieve a return on their investment is through appreciation in the price of our common stock.

We currently do
not plan to pay dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future and are currently prohibited from doing so in specific circumstances under agreements governing our borrowing arrangements. The terms of our senior secured revolving
credit facility limit our ability to pay cash dividends on any shares of our common stock. Furthermore, if we are in default under this credit facility, our ability to pay cash dividends will be limited in the absence of a waiver of that default or
an amendment to that facility. Similar prohibitions are applicable under the indenture governing Spansion LLCs outstanding notes. In addition, because we are a holding company, our ability to pay cash dividends on shares of our common stock
may be limited by restrictions on our ability to obtain sufficient funds through dividends from our subsidiaries, including the restrictions under the indenture governing the notes. Our common stock will rank junior as to payment of dividends to any
series of preferred stock that we may issue in the future. Generally, unless full dividends including any cumulative dividends still owing on all outstanding shares of any preferred stock have been paid, no dividends will be declared or paid on our
common stock. Consequently, your only opportunity to achieve a return on your investment in our company will be if the market price of our common stock appreciates.

Our issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect holders of our common stock.

Our board
of directors is authorized to issue series of shares of preferred stock without any action on the part of our stockholders. Our board of directors also has the power, without stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such series of shares of
preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, dividend rights and preferences over our common stock with respect to dividends or if we liquidate, dissolve or wind up our business and other terms. If we issue preferred stock in the
future that has preference over our common stock with respect to the payment of dividends or upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs, or if we issue preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting power of our common
stock, the rights of holders of our common stock or the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected.

Provisions in
our corporate governance documents as well as Delaware law may delay or prevent an acquisition of us that stockholders may consider favorable, which could decrease the value of your shares.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without
the consent of our board of directors. These provisions include restrictions on the ability of our stockholders to remove directors, a classified board of directors and limitations on action by our stockholders by written consent. In



55



---

##### Table of Contents

addition, our board of directors has the right to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used
to make an acquisition of us more difficult. Although we believe these provisions protect our stockholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics and thereby provide for an opportunity to receive a higher bid by requiring potential
acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on
May 12, 2006 in East Palo Alto, California. Of the 91,286,745 shares of Class A common stock, 1 share of Class B common stock, 1 share of Class C common stock and 32,352,934 shares of Class D common stock outstanding as of the record date,
96 percent of Class A common stock, and 100 percent of each of Class B, Class C and Class D common stock were present or represented by proxy at the meeting. The results of the voting on the matters submitted to the stockholders are as follows:

1. To elect one Class A director to serve until the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his successor is duly elected and qualified.



|              |  |            |  |               
|------------- |  | ---------- |  | --------------
|Name          |  | Votes For  |  | Votes Withheld
|David K. Chao |  | 84,981,597 |  | 6,305,148     

2. To elect one Class B director to serve until the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his
successor is duly elected and qualified.



|                  |  |           |  |               
|----------------- |  | --------- |  | --------------
|Name              |  | Votes For |  | Votes Withheld
|Hector de J. Ruiz |  | 1         |  | 0             

In addition, the terms of office of the following directors continued after the
2006 meeting:

Bertrand F. Cambou

Patti S. Hart

Toshihiko Ono

Robert J. Rivet

David E. Roberson

2. To ratify the
appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.



|            |  |               |  |                  |  |                
|----------- |  | ------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ---------------
|Votes For   |  | Votes Against |  | Votes Abstaining |  | Broker Non-Vote
|119,248,283 |  | 605           |  | 200              |  | 0              



56



---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits



|      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|----- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3.1   |  | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Spansions Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 21, 2005, is hereby incorporated by
reference.                                                                                                                           
|      | 
|3.2   |  | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Spansion Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Spansions Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 21, 2005, is hereby incorporated by reference.                                                                                                                                
|      | 
|4.5   |  | Indenture, dated as of June 12, 2006, governing the 2.25% Exchangeable Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2016, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Spansions Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15,
2006, is hereby incorporated by reference.                                                                  
|      | 
|10.66 |  | Amended and Restated Uncommitted Revolving Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2006, between Spansion Japan Limited and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., filed as Exhibit 10.1
to Spansions Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 28, 2005, is hereby incorporated by reference.
|      | 
|10.67 |  | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 12, 2006, among Spansion Inc., Spansion LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
Spansions Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2006, is hereby incorporated by reference.              
|      | 
|10.68 |  | Employment Offer Letter, dated as of June 14, 2006, between Spansion LLC and José Mejia.                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|      | 
|31.1  |  | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|      | 
|31.2  |  | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|      | 
|32.1* |  | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                                   
|      | 
|32.2* |  | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                                   

---

|* | Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such exhibits shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



57



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



|                      |  |               |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | ------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                      |  | SPANSION INC.
|                      |  |              
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  | By:           |  | /s/ Dario Sacomani           
|                      |  |               |  | Dario Sacomani               
|                      |  |               |  | Executive Vice President and 
|                      |  |               |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                      |  |               |  | (Principal Financial Officer)



58