alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i.) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended April 1, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii.) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |             |  |  |  |                                                     
|----- |  | ----------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | May 9, 2007 |  |  |  | /S/ DARIO SACOMANI                                  
|      |  |             |  |  |  | Dario Sacomani                                      
|      |  |             |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



56
#### William G. Major Construction Company, Inc. *v.*John DeMichely et al.

*Jules Lang,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Raymond F. Ross,*for the appellant (named defendant) .

Argued November 2

decided November 2, 1971

The motion by the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted.
Exhibit
23.1

CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.
33-43290, 33-65380, 33-65382, 33-80433 and 333-53602) pertaining to the Health
Management Associates, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan and various employee and
directors stock option plans of Health Management Associates, Inc. and
Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-86034, 333-102686 and 333-109756) of
Health Management Associates, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our
report dated October 29, 2004, except for Note 13, as to which the date is November 30, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Health Management Associates, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2004.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Certified Public Accountants
Tampa, Florida
December 13, 2004

---

---
#### Johnie L. Pinkney, an Infant, by Johnie Pinkney, His Father and Natural Guardian, et al., Respondents, v. Carlos Rivera, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order entered September 28, 1966, denying defendant-appellant’s motion to vacate his default, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion granted, on condition that defendant-appellant submit to examination before trial and pay $30 costs and disbursements of this appeal and the action to date plus $250 counsel fee within 10 days after service of the order to be settled hereon, in default of which the motion is denied. Undoubtedly defendant-appellant has been remiss in violating the orders compelling his appearance for examination. Nevertheless, in the circumstances, we hold that the interests of justice would best be served by granting the vacatur. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Steuer and Witmer, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2
------------

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the quarterly report of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Alan Ginsberg, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: November 14, 2005


/s/ Alan S. Ginsberg
--------------------
Alan S. Ginsberg
Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. (the “Registrant”) for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, I, James P. Henderson, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officerof the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date:  | November 8, 2007               |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |                           |
|   |                           |
| By:    | /s/ James P. Henderson         |   |
|   | James P. Henderson             |
|   | Chief Financial Officer        |
|   | (principal financial  officer) |

 

----
Exhibit (31.2)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bruce J. Magee, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Harleysville Group Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  March 11, 2005 |  | /s/BRUCEJ. MAGEE                                 
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | Bruce J. Magee                                   
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: A Retrospective Look at U.S. Education Statistics      

# Report: A Retrospective Look at U.S. Education Statistics

This report is a commemorative guide that is intended to provide a better understanding of the history and use of federal education statistics that have been collected and reported by this agency since 1868. Statistics covered in the report include: 
                  -  Number of elementary and secondary schools  
                  -  Enrollment in elementary and secondary schools  
                  -  Attendance and length of school year in elementary and secondary schools  
                  -  High school graduates and graduation rates  
                  -  High school course-taking  
                  -  Elementary and secondary revenues and expenditures  
                  -  Number of postsecondary institutions  
                  -  Enrollment in postsecondary institutions  
                  -  Postsecondary student costs and financing   

**Learn more.**
#### In the Matter of William Murphy, Appellant, v. Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Garden City et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 3, 1966, affirmed, with costs. While we agree that appellant was “aggrieved” by the respondent board’s determination, we think that determination was reasonable and was properly confirmed by the Special Term *(Matter of Lemir Realty Corp.*v. *Larkin,*11 N Y 2d 20, 24; *Matter of Village of Bronxville*v. *Francis,*1 A D 2d 236, affd. 1 N Y 2d 839). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7449** 

BOBBY D. MORGAN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN D. BERKEBILE; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Beckley

. Irene C. Berger , District Judge. ( 5:09

- cv - 00966 )

Submitted : April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Bobby D. Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. R. Booth Goodwin, II, United States Attorney, J. Christopher Krivonyak, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bobby D. Morgan , a District of Columbia Code offender , seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2241 ( West 200 6 & Supp. 2011 ) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the di spositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Morgan has not made the requisite sh owing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          Subsidiaries of Registrant
                          --------------------------

     Subsidiary
     ----------

Hospital Management Associates, Inc., a Kentucky Corporation
Health Management Associates, Inc., a Kentucky Corporation
Sebring Hospital Management Associates, Inc., a Florida Corporation
Mooresville Hospital Management Associates, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation
Marathon HMA, Inc., a Florida Corporation
Louisburg HMA, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation
Orlando HMA, Inc., a Florida Corporation
Biloxi HMA, Inc., a Mississippi Corporation
Health Management Investments, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Gaffney HMA, Inc., a South Carolina Corporation
Durant HMA, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation
Van Buren HMA, Inc., an Arkansas Corporation
Hamlet HMA, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation
Health Management Associates of West Virginia, Inc., a West Virginia Corporation
Paintsville Hospital Company, a Kentucky Corporation
Coffee Hospital Management Associates, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation
Riverview Regional Medical Center, Inc., an Alabama Corporation
Topeka HMA, Inc., a Kansas Corporation
Haines City HMA, Inc., a Florida Corporation
Natchez Community Hospital, Inc., a Mississippi Corporation
Sebastian Hospital, Inc., a Florida Corporation
Punta Gorda HMA, Inc., a Florida Corporation
Hartsville HMA, Inc., a South Carolina Corporation
Statesboro HMA, Inc., a Georgia Corporation
Clarksdale HMA, Inc., a Mississippi Corporation
Midwest City HMA, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation
Brandon HMA, Inc., a Mississippi Corporation
Anniston HMA, Inc., an Alabama Corporation
Little Rock HMA, Inc., an Arkansas Corporation
Meridian HMA, Inc., a Mississippi Corporation
Meridian HMA Nursing Home, Inc., a Mississippi Corporation
River Oaks Hospital, Inc., a Mississippi Corporation
ROH, Inc., a Mississippi Corporation
River Oaks Management Company, a Mississippi Corporation
Hernando HMA, Inc., a Florida Corporation
Jackson HMA, Inc., a Mississippi Corporation
Key West HMA, Inc., a Florida Corporation
Key West HMA Physician Management, Inc.
Lancaster HMA, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation
Lancaster HMA Physician Management, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation
#### Stephen Maryinuk, Appellant, v. John M. Pendell, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The court’s charge, to which appellant excepted, did not adequately state the right of way rules applicable to the uncontrolled intersection where the collision occurred. (Cf. *Palmigiano*v. *Stiles,*282 App. Div. 826.) The evidence shows that appellant drove his truck west on a town road into the intersection and collided with respondent’s automobile which was going north on a State highway. There was evidence from which the jury could have found that appellant’s truck entered the intersection before respondent’s automobile did and there was also evidence from which it could have been found that both vehicles entered it at approximately the same-time. In either situation appellant would have had the right of way. (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1140, subds. [a], [b].) The court failed to make these right of way rules clear to the jury and the jury may well have understood from the court’s charge that the State highway was a through highway and that the driver of the car traveling thereon had the right of way, whereas the State highway was not a through highway (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 149) and travellers on both highways were subject to the same right of way rules at the intersection. (Appeal from judgment of Oswego Trial Term dismissing the complaint in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28785]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Time and Date:  Wednesday, November 17, 2010; 2 p.m.-3 p.m.

Place:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status:  Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered: 

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: November 9, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-28785 Filed 11-10-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
#### Lunetta L. Danford, administratrix of the estate of M. L. Danford, deceased, for the use of D. L. Dunbar, appellee, v. W. H. Watkins et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 8,235.

*629Opinion filed October 15, 1928.

Rehearing denied January 4, 1929.

Leslie J. Taylor, Edward E. Adams and C. E. Elesher, for appellant. & Reese and John W. Coale, for appellees.

Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
OFFICE ADDRESS 

125 Access Road 

Norwood, MA 02062 

BY FED EX 

May 14,2015 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Norwood Memoria/Airport 

Russ Maguire, A.A.E., ACE, Airport Manager 

Attn: FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk AGC-600 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

RE: Part 16 Complaint: Boston Executive Helicopters v. Town of Norwood, 

Massachusetts and Norwood Airport Commission; Docket No. 16-15-05 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

MAILING ADDRESS 

125 Access Road 

Norwood, MA 02062 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 16, please accept these supplemental materials which are referenced 

in the Answer by the Respondents, Town of Norwood, Massachusetts and Norwood Airport 

Commission, to the Part 16 Complaint filed by the Complainant, Boston Executive Helicopters 

("BEH"). The Answer was served on May 8, 2015 via overnight mail and e-mail. 

Enclosed are three additional copies of an aerial photo, marked accordingly (see below). These 

additional copies were requested by FAA Attorney, Jessie Di Gregory, in a phone conversation 

earlier this week with Town of Norwood Counsel's Attorney, Brandon Moss. 

A copy of the Certificate of Service for the Answer is attached. 

These supplemental materials are intended to help illustrate and clarify the Respondents' Answer 

relative to the Norwood Airport's Security Gate #3 taxi-lane. These materials include a February 

2014 aerial photo of the Norwood Airport, looking generally east. 

Phone: (781) 255-5615 I Fax: (781) 255-5617 I rmaguire@norwoodma.gov I VOICE/TTY- UsePhoneRe1ay 
The photo markings include: 

• on the aerial photo is the Security Gate #3 taxi-lane 

• Marked in yellow on the aerial photo is the BEH hangar/fuel farm complex, which was 

under construction at the time of the photo 

Please let me know if I can provide any further information on this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

~~. 

Russ Maguire, Manager ~ 

Norwood Memorial Airport 

Cell: 781-603-5373 

E-mail: rmaguire@norwoodma.gov 

Cc: Timothy 1 McCulloch, Esquire: Norwood Airport Commission; Norwood General 

Manager; Norwood Town Counsel; Massachusetts Department of TransportationAeronautics Division