alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Impacts of the Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System (EWIMS) After One Year      

# Report: Impacts of the Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System (EWIMS) After One Year

This report describes a study that examined the impacts of EWIMS, a systematic approach to early identification and intervention with students at risk of not graduating on time. Published by Regional Education Laboratory Northwest, the report shows that after a year of limited implementation, EWIMS reduced chronic absence and course failures, but did not reduce the percentage of students with low grade point averages, suspensions, or insufficient credits for graduation. 

http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=388&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
RE: Norton Energy Miracle, Laura t o : Cheryl Suttman, Shaheerah Kelly 12/02/2009 12:45 PM
Cc: "Vadas, Sean" History: This message has been forwarded.

The facility was never installed for Norton Energy (6771000330) and is permanently shut down in Stars 2. A lso, the other permit under 1677105001 for Norton Energy was never installed. Y ou can locate these facility in Stars 2 by putting nothing (blank) for the operating status in the pull down bar. Sean V adas worked on both of the permits. Y ou can contact him if you have any questions on the installation permits. Neither facility was issued a Title V. The 1677105001 facility was a synthetic minor. 

### Sincerely,
Laura Miracle (330)375-2480 ext. 4239 From: Cheryl Suttman [Cheryl.Suttman@epa.state.oh.us] Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 3:21 PM To: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov Cc: Miracle, Laura; Laura Miracle Subject: Norton Energy 

### Dear Kelly, I did not see the Title V at this address. I am not sure why, it should have an issued TV. I have copied Laura Miracle from this local office, hoping she can help me find it. I am going to be out of the office till Monday. Please e-mail one of us back if you don't get if from one of us. Laura might also be able to help you with any additional questions regarding this facility. This address has a link to most of our issued permits. The Word Perfect file attached may be at this address too. http :// wwwapp
. epa
. ohio

. gov / dapc /newpermits / p ermits 77

. html
§ 15a.135 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* Each recipient shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with and carry out its responsibilities under this part, including any investigation of any complaint communicated to such recipient alleging its noncompliance with this part or alleging any actions that would be prohibited by this part. The recipient shall notify all its students and employees of the name, office address, and telephone number of the employee or employees appointed pursuant to this paragraph.
( b ) *Complaint procedure of recipient.* A recipient shall adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of student and employee complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by this part.
#### § 1717.903 Liability.

It is the intent of this subpart that any failure on the part of RUS to comply with any provisions of this subpart, including without limitation, those provisions setting forth specified timeframes for action by RUS on applications for lien accommodations or lien subordinations, shall not give rise to liability of any kind on the part of the Government or any employees of the Government including, without limitation, liability for damages, fees, expenses or costs incurred by or on behalf of a borrower, private lender or any other party.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1480

___________________________

Peter R. Wright

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Judge Frank Magill; Hennepin County 4th District Court

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: October 2, 2019

Filed: October 7, 2019 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Peter Wright appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil action raising 1

claims related to an unsuccessful action he brought in state court. After careful

review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that dismissal

was proper. See Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 11-12 (1991) (per curiam) (discussing

judicial immunity); Harris v. Mo. Court of Appeals, 787 F.2d 427, 429 (8th Cir.

1986) (stating that state courts possess Eleventh Amendment immunity). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable JohnR. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations ofthe Honorable

Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 1421
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart E of part 1421 appear at 74 FR 15656, Apr. 7, 2009.

§ 1421.402 DMA eligibility to process MALs and LDPs. ( a ) A DMA is eligible to process any MAL or LDPs only if approved in advance to handle such matters by the Farm Service Agency pursuant to this part; and ( 1 ) The DMA meets the financial requirements and other requirements in this subpart and part;
( 2 ) The DMA is comprised solely of peanut producers or is a subsidiary of an organization of peanut producers;
( 3 ) The DMA is not controlled directly or indirectly by a person or entity that acquires peanuts for processing or crushing through a business involved in buying and selling peanuts or peanut products;
( 4 ) The DMA does not take title at any time to any peanuts for which it processes MALs or LDPs, irrespective of whether such title is taken before or after those activities are performed. If such title or interest is taken, the DMA is required to return to CCC the full amount of the CCC proceeds disbursed with respect to the peanuts; and
( 5 ) The DMA meets any additional requirements imposed by CCC or FSA.
( b ) The DMA's activities under this part are to be conducted only with respect to peanuts and only for producers and peanuts that meet all the eligibility requirements of this part. Such requirements include, but are not limited to, the requirement of § 1421.6 that the producer must have the beneficial interest in the peanuts while the peanuts are under MAL or when the LDP is received and must be the only person that has had such an interest in the peanuts prior to that time except as allowed by § 1421.6.
[70 FR 33799, June 10, 2005. Redesignated at 74 FR 15656, Apr. 7, 2009; 80 FR 128, Jan. 2, 2015]
Exhibit
      32.1


**Certification
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted**
 **Pursuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
  Solely
        for the purpose of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely
        to
        the extent this certification may be applicable to this report, the undersigned
        hereby certify that this report of Legacy Communications Corporation (the
        “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this
        report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and
        results of operations of the Company.


Date:
                  April 26, 2007
              /s/
                    E. Morgan Skinner, Jr.Name:
              E. Morgan Skinner, Jr.Title:
              President, Chief Executive
                Officerand
                    Chief Financial
                    Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe 2nd Symposium on the Frontiers of Massively Parallel ComputationsProgramming languages, computer graphics, neural networks, massively parallel computers, SIMD architecture, algorithms, digital terrain models, sort computation, simulation of charged particle transport on the massively parallel processor and image processing are among the topics discussed.Document ID19900007126Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsAuthorsMills, Ronnie*(ST Systems Corp. Lanham, MD., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1988Publication InformationPublisher: IEEE Computer Society PressISBN: 0-8186-0892-7Subject CategoryComputer SystemsReport/Patent NumberLC-88-82088SAN-264-620XNAS 1.15:101918IEEE-ORDER-892NASA-TM-101918IEEE-CATALOG-88CH2649-2Accession Number90N16442Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900007126.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitleN90-16443 through N90-16454Workvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
<!--XBRL document created with Toppan Merrill Bridge  10.3.0.9 -->
<!--Based on XBRL 2.1-->
<!--Created on: 8/2/2023 8:18:34 PM-->
<!--Modified on: 8/2/2023 8:18:34 PM-->
<xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://nl.com/20230802" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:currency="http://xbrl.sec.gov/currency/2022" xmlns:dei="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022" xmlns:us-roles="http://fasb.org/us-roles/2022" xmlns:ref="http://www.xbrl.org/2006/ref" xmlns:xbrldt="http://xbrl.org/2005/xbrldt" xmlns:xl="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/XLink" xmlns:sic="http://xbrl.sec.gov/sic/2022" xmlns:us-types="http://fasb.org/us-types/2022" xmlns:srt-roles="http://fasb.org/srt-roles/2022" xmlns:stpr="http://xbrl.sec.gov/stpr/2022" xmlns:utr="http://www.xbrl.org/2009/utr" xmlns:us-gaap="http://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:srt-types="http://fasb.org/srt-types/2022" xmlns:exch="http://xbrl.sec.gov/exch/2022" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:naics="http://xbrl.sec.gov/naics/2022" xmlns:country="http://xbrl.sec.gov/country/2022" xmlns:negated="http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/negated" xmlns:attributeFormDefault="unqualified" xmlns:xbrli="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:srt="http://fasb.org/srt/2022" xmlns:enum2="http://xbrl.org/2020/extensible-enumerations-2.0" xmlns:dtr-types="http://www.xbrl.org/dtr/type/2020-01-21" xmlns:deprecated="http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/deprecated" xmlns:net="http://www.xbrl.org/2009/role/net" xmlns:nl="http://nl.com/20230802" xmlns:dtr="http://www.xbrl.org/2009/dtr" xmlns:cef="http://xbrl.sec.gov/cef/2022" xmlns:xbrldi="http://xbrl.org/2006/xbrldi">
  <xsd:annotation>
    <xsd:appinfo>
      <link:roleType roleURI="http://nl.com/role/DocumentDocumentAndEntityInformation" id="DocumentDocumentAndEntityInformation">
        <link:definition>00090 - Document - Document and Entity Information</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
      <link:linkbaseRef xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="nl-20230802_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" />
      <link:linkbaseRef xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="nl-20230802_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" />
    </xsd:appinfo>
  </xsd:annotation>
  <xsd:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd" />
  <xsd:import namespace="http://xbrl.org/2005/xbrldt" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2005/xbrldt-2005.xsd" />
  <xsd:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022/dei-2022.xsd" />
</xsd:schema>
</XBRL>
#### American Slicing Machine Company, appellant, v. Jesse S. Bennett, appellee.

Gen. No. 8,215.

Opinion filed January 24, 1929.

Mann & Coleman, for appellant. Graham & Dysert, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1424.12 Appeals. ( a ) A participant subject to an adverse determination under this part may appeal by submitting a written request to: Deputy Administrator, Commodity Operations, Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, STOP 0550, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, D.C. 20250-0550. The appeal must be delivered in writing to the Deputy Administrator or postmarked within 30 days after the date the Agency decision is mailed or otherwise provided to the participant. The Deputy Administrator may consider a late appeal if determined warranted by the circumstances.
( b ) The regulations at 7 CFR part 11 apply to decisions made under this part.
( c ) Producers who believe they have been adversely affected by a determination by the Agency must seek review with the Deputy Administrator before any other review may be requested within the Agency.
CERTIFICATION

I, Larry Mosley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Data Call Technologies,Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2010

/s/ Larry MosleyCFO and Director
§ 1486.406 Advances. ( a ) *Policy.* In general, CCC operates the EMP on a cost reimbursable basis.
( b ) *Exception.* Upon request, CCC may make advance payments to a Recipient against an approved project budget. Up to 40 percent of the approved project budget may be provided as an advance, either at one time or in incremental payments. Advances should be limited to the minimum amounts needed and requested as close as is administratively feasible to the actual time of disbursement by the Recipient. Reimbursement claims will be used to offset advances. Recipients shall deposit and maintain advances in insured, interest-bearing accounts, unless the exceptions in 2 CFR part 200 apply. Interest earned by the Recipient on funds advanced by CCC is not program income. Up to $500 of interest earned per year may be retained by the Recipient for administrative expenses. Any additional interest earned on Federal advance payments shall be remitted annually to the appropriate entity as required in 2 CFR part 200.
( c ) *Refunds due CCC.* A Recipient shall fully expend all advances on approved activities within 90 calendar days after the date of disbursement by CCC. By the end of 90 calendar days, the Recipient must submit reimbursement claims to offset the advance and submit a check made payable to CCC for any unexpended balance. The Recipient shall make such payment in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise approved in advance by CCC.
§ 1780.11 Service area requirements. ( a ) All facilities financed under the provisions of this part shall be for public use. The facilities will be installed so as to serve any potential user within the service area who desires service and can be feasibly and legally served. This does not preclude: ( 1 ) Financing or constructing projects in phases when it is not practical to finance or construct the entire project at one time; and
( 2 ) Financing or constructing facilities where it is not economically feasible to serve the entire area, provided economic feasibility is determined on the basis of the entire system and not by considering the cost of separate extensions to or parts thereof; the applicant publicly announces a plan for extending service to areas not initially receiving service from the system; and potential users located in the areas not to be initially served receive written notice from the applicant that service will not be provided until such time as it is economically feasible to do so.
( b ) Should the Agency determine that inequities exist within the applicants service area for the same type service proposed (i.e., water or waste disposal) such inequities will be remedied by the applicant prior to loan or grant approval or included as part of the project. Inequities are defined as unjustified variations in availability, adequacy or quality of service. User rate schedules for portions of existing systems that were developed under different financing, rates, terms or conditions do not necessarily constitute inequities.
( c ) Developers are normally expected to provide utility-type facilities in new or developing areas in compliance with appropriate State statutes. RUS financing will be considered to an eligible applicant only in such cases when failure to complete development would result in an adverse economic condition for the rural area (not the community being developed); the proposal is necessary to the success of a current area development plan; and loan repayment can be assured by: ( 1 ) The applicant already having sufficient assured revenues to repay the loan; or
( 2 ) Developers providing a bond or escrowed security deposit as a guarantee sufficient to meet expenses attributable to the area in question until a sufficient number of the building sites are occupied and connected to the facility to provide enough revenues to meet operating, maintenance, debt service, and reserve requirements. Such guarantees from developers will meet the requirements in § 1780.39(c)(4)(ii); or
( 3 ) Developers paying cash for the increased capital cost and any increased operating expenses until the developing area will support the increased costs; or
( 4 ) The full faith and credit of a public body where the debt is evidenced by general obligation bonds; or
( 5 ) The loan is to a public body evidenced by a pledge of tax revenue or assessments; or
( 6 ) The user charges can become a lien upon the property being served and income from such lien can be collected in sufficient time to be used for its intended purposes.