alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer of Affinity GroupHolding, Inc., certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofAffinity Group Holding, Inc.;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures, (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:

(a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

(c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 
| Date: November 3, 2006 |   | /s/ Michael A. Schneider               |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Michael A.  Schneider                  |
|                   |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

30

----
§ 1484.35 Contracting procedures. ( a ) Cooperators have full and sole responsibility for the legal sufficiency of all contracts and assume financial liability for any costs or claims resulting from suits, challenges, or other disputes based on contracts entered into by the Cooperator. Neither CCC nor any other agency of the United States Government nor any official or employee of CCC, FAS, USDA, or the United States Government has any obligation or responsibility with respect to Cooperator contracts with third parties.
( b ) Cooperators are responsible for ensuring to the greatest extent possible that the terms, conditions, and costs of contracts constitute the most economical and effective use of project funds.
( c ) All fees for professional and technical services paid in any part with project funds must be covered by written contracts.
( d ) A Cooperator shall: ( 1 ) Ensure that no employee, officer, board member, agent, or the employee's, officer's, board member's, or agent's family, partners, or an organization that employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated in this paragraph (d)(1) participates in the review, selection, award, or administration of a contract in which such entities or their affiliates have a financial or other interest;
( 2 ) Conduct all contracting in an openly competitive manner. Individuals who develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, invitations for bids, or requests for proposals for procurement of any goods or services, and such individuals' families or partners, or an organization that employs or is about to employ any of the aforementioned, shall be excluded from competition for such procurement;
( 3 ) Base each solicitation for professional or technical services on a clear and accurate description of and requirements related to the services to be procured;
( 4 ) Perform and document some form of price or cost analysis, such as a comparison of price quotations to market prices or other price indicia, to determine the reasonableness of the offered prices for procurements in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold in 2 CFR 200.88; and
( 5 ) Document the decision-making process.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1435.602 Eligible sugar to be purchased by CCC. ( a ) CCC will only purchase raw sugar, refined sugar, or in-process sugar for FFP that is eligible to be used as collateral under the CCC Sugar Loan Program, as specified in § 1435.102.
( b ) Raw sugar, refined sugar, or in-process sugar purchased directly from any domestic sugar beet or sugarcane processor that made the raw sugar, refined sugar, or in-process sugar will be credited against the processor's sugar marketing allocation. (The definition for “marketing” in § 1435.2 applies to this subpart.)
( c ) CCC will only purchase sugar located in the United States.
( d ) CCC will evaluate an offer to sell sugar to CCC based upon CCC's estimate of the reduction in refined sugar supply available for human consumption due to the purchase. For example, if processing thick juice (an in-process sugar) would yield 70 percent sugar for human consumption, then CCC will only consider 70 percent of the volume of the thick juice in evaluating the per unit sales price.
( e ) CCC will only purchase the sugar if such purchase would reduce the likelihood of forfeitures of CCC sugar loans, as determined by CCC.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Federal Justice Statistics Program 2020-2021 Datasets      

# Resource: Federal Justice Statistics Program 2020-2021 Datasets

The BJA released 35 datasets from the Federal Justice Statistics Program (FJSP) for 2020 and 2021 through the National Archive of Criminal Justice Data. The FJSP covers the following seven stages of federal criminal case processing: 
                  -  Arrest: the arrest of a suspect by a federal law enforcement agency.  
                  -  Prosecution: the investigation of criminal matters.  
                  -  Pretrial release: the release and detention of defendants before adjudication.  
                  -  Adjudication: criminal court proceedings through case disposition.  
                  -  Sentencing: sentences imposed on convicted defendants.  
                  -  Appeals: cases filed and terminated on appeal.  
                  -  Corrections: offenders under supervision (i.e., probation, supervised release, or parole) and offenders in prison.   

**Learn more.**
§ 1590.18 Opportunities to object and appeals. ( a ) FAS will provide an opportunity to a recipient to object to, and provide information and documentation challenging, any action taken by FAS pursuant to § 1590.16. FAS will comply with any requirements for hearings, appeals, or other administrative proceedings to which the recipient is entitled under any other statute or regulation applicable to the action involved. In the absence of such other requirements, the requirements set forth in this section will apply.
( b ) The recipient must submit its objection in writing, along with any documentation, to the FAS official specified in the agreement within 30 days after the date that FAS notified the recipient that FAS was taking the action being challenged. This official will endeavor to notify the recipient of his or her determination within 60 days after the date that FAS received the recipient's written objection.
( c ) The recipient may appeal the determination of the official to the Administrator, FAS. An appeal must be in writing and be submitted to the Office of the Administrator within 30 days after the date of the initial determination by the FAS official. The recipient may submit additional documentation with its appeal.
( d ) The Administrator will base the determination on appeal upon information contained in the administrative record and will endeavor to make a determination within 60 days after the date that FAS received the appeal. The determination of the Administrator will be the final determination of FAS. The recipient must exhaust all administrative remedies contained in this section before pursuing judicial review of a determination by the Administrator.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIndependent Orbiter Assessment (IOA): Analysis of the hydraulics/water spray boiler subsystemThe results of the Independent Orbiter Assessment (IOA) of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Critical Items List (CIL) are presented. The IOA approach features a top-down analysis of the hardware to determine failure modes, criticality, and potential critical items (PCIs). To preserve independence, this analysis was accomplished without reliance upon the results contained within the NASA FMEA/CIL documentation. This report documents the independent analysis results for the Orbiter Hydraulics/Water Spray Boiler Subsystem. The hydraulic system provides hydraulic power to gimbal the main engines, actuate the main engine propellant control valves, move the aerodynamic flight control surfaces, lower the landing gear, apply wheel brakes, steer the nosewheel, and dampen the external tank (ET) separation. Each hydraulic system has an associated water spray boiler which is used to cool the hydraulic fluid and APU lubricating oil. The IOA analysis process utilized available HYD/WSB hardware drawings, schematics and documents for defining hardware assemblies, components, and hardware items. Each level of hardware was evaluated and analyzed for possible failure modes and effects. Criticality was assigned based upon the severity of the effect for each failure mode. Of the 430 failure modes analyzed, 166 were determined to be PCIs.Document ID19900001618Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDuval, J. D.*(McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Davidson, W. R.*(McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Parkman, William E.*(McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 19, 1986Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberREPT-1.0-WP-VA86001-20NAS 1.26:185541NASA-CR-185541Accession Number90N10934Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17650Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900001618.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 10.30


 


BioRestorative Therapies, Inc.


555 Heritage Drive


Jupiter, Florida 33458


 


December 7, 2012


 


Mr. Francisco Silva


10 Flyers Lane


Tustin, California 92782


 


Dear Mr. Silva:


 


Reference is made to
the Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2011, between BioRestorative Therapies, Inc. (formerly
known as Stem Cell Assurance, Inc.) and Francisco Silva, as amended (the “Agreement”).


 


The parties hereby
agree that, effective as of January 1, 2013, the “Per Annum Salary” in Schedule A of the Agreement is amended to read
as follows:


 


“Per Annum Salary:
$230,000”


 


Except as amended hereby,
the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	BioRestorative Therapies, Inc. 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
	 	 	Mark Weinreb, Chief Executive Officer


 


	Agreed:	 
	 	 
	/s/	 
	Francisco Silva
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Society of Mechanical Engineers

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 14, 2010, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Society of 
Mechanical Engineers (``ASME'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, since June 
24, 2010, ASME has published five new standards, initiated seven new 
standards activities, and withdrawn three standards within the general 
nature and scope of ASME's standards development activities, as 
specified in its original notification. More detail regarding these 
changes can be found at http://www.asme.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASME filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on October 13, 2004 (69 FR 60895).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 28, 
2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 2, 2010 (75 FR 45156).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-28560 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Processing of Delinquency Cases      

# Resource: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Processing of Delinquency Cases

This resource (PDF, 1 page) uses data from the OJJDP National Juvenile Court Data Archive to assess variations in case processing based on race and ethnicity. **Learn more.**
**Exhibit 13.2**

**ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned, Shou-Kang Chen, Chief Financial Officer of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Company’s Annual Report on Form20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 solely for purposes of complying with the provisions ofSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 

Date: April 20, 2017
Opinion issued November 15 , 201 2

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 1 2

- 0 0893

- CR

——————————— STAN DUANE JENNINGS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Ca u se No. 48307

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Stan Duane Jennings
, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.
The motion complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2 (a)

. See T EX

. R.2

A PP

. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued an opinion in the appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
42.2(b ).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.2(f). We
dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle

. Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-31300 Summary Calendar

DWAYNE BROWN Plaintiff-Appellant

v. LOUISIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; RICHARD L STALDER Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:06-CV-568
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges: PER CURIAM: * Dwayne Brown, Louisiana prisoner # 96518, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. Brown argues that the defendants, the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections (the Department) and Richard Stalder, have erroneously classified him as a fourth felony offender, a determination which has rendered him ineligible for parole. The Louisiana SupremeCourt, however, has held that the Department is not bound by a court’s United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 14, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-31300

2 habitual offender adjudication in calculating parole eligibility. Townley v. Dep’t of Public Safety & Corr., 681 So. 2d 951, 953 (La. 1996). Because Brown’s civil rights action isfactually frivolous, the district court’sjudgment is affirmed. See Bickford v. Int’l Speedway Corp., 654 F.2d 1028, 1031 (5th Cir. 1981). We warn Brown that our affirmance of the district court’s dismissal of his complaint counts as one strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that, ifhe accumulates three strikes, he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed w

hile he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger ofserious physical injury. SeeAdepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1863 

To require the Secretary of State to submit a report on water sharing 

with Mexico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2013 

Mr. VELA (for himself and Mr. O’ROURKE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to submit a report on 

water sharing with Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON WATER SHARING. 

4 Not later than 120 days after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act and annually thereafter, the Secretary 

6 of State shall submit to Congress a report on— 

7 (1) efforts by Mexico to meet its treaty deliv8 eries of water to the Rio Grande in accordance with 

9 the Treaty between the United States and Mexico 

10 Respecting Utilization of waters of the Colorado and 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1863 IH

1 Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande (done at 

2 Washington, February 3, 1944); and 

3 (2) the benefits to the United States of the In4 terim International Cooperative Measures in the Col5 orado River Basin through 2017 and Extension of 

6 Minute 318 Cooperative Measures to Address the 

7 Continued Effects of the April 2010 Earthquake in 

8 the Mexicali Valley, Baja, California (done at Coro9 nado, California, November 20, 2012; commonly re10 ferred to as ‘‘Minute No. 319’’). 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS