alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1710.302 Financial forecasts—power supply borrowers. ( a ) The requirements of this section apply only to financial forecasts submitted by power supply borrowers in support of a loan from RUS. The financial forecast prepared by power supply borrowers shall demonstrate the effects that the addition of generation, transmission and any distribution facilities will have on the power supply borrower's sales, costs, and revenues, and on the cost of power to the member distribution systems.
( b ) The financial forecast shall cover a period of 10 years. RUS may request projections for a longer period of time if RUS deems necessary.
( c ) Financial forecasts prepared in support of loan applications to finance additional generation capacity shall include a power cost study as set forth in § 1710.303.
( d ) In addition to the requirements set forth in § 1710.300, financial forecasts prepared by power supply borrowers shall: ( 1 ) Identify all plans for generation and transmission capital additions and system operating expenses on a year-by-year basis, beginning with the present and running for 10 years, unless a longer period of time has been requested by RUS.
( 2 ) Integrate projections of operation and maintenance expenses associated with existing plant with those of new proposed facilities to determine total costs of system operation as well as the costs of new generation and generation-related facilities;
( 3 ) Provide an in-depth analysis of the regional markets for power if loan feasibility depends to any degree on a borrower's ability to sell surplus power while its system loads grow to meet the planned capacity of a proposed plant;
( 4 ) If not previously submitted, furnish RUS with all material information on operating agreements, ownership agreements, fuel contracts and any other special agreements that affect annual cost projections, as may be required by RUS on a case by case basis; and
( 5 ) Include sensitivity analysis if required by RUS pursuant to § 1710.300(d)(6).
( e ) The projections shall be coordinated in advance with RUS so that agreement can be reached on major aspects of the economic studies. These include, but are not limited to, projections of future kW and kWh requirements, RE Act beneficiary loads, electricity prices, revenues from system and off-system power sales, the cost of prospective plant additions, interest and depreciation rates, fuel costs, cost escalation factors, the discount rate, and other factors.
( f ) The projections, analysis, and supporting information must be included in a report that will provide RUS with the information needed to: ( 1 ) Understand and compare various power supply plans;
( 2 ) Determine that the facilities to be financed will perform satisfactorily; and
( 3 ) Determine that the overall system is economically viable and the loan is financially feasible and secure.
[57 FR 1053, Jan. 9, 1992, as amended at 63 FR 53278, Oct. 5, 1998; 78 FR 73366, Dec. 5, 2013]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Participation in High School Career and Technical Education and Postsecondary Enrollment      

# Report: Participation in High School Career and Technical Education and Postsecondary Enrollment

This report analyzes the relationship between high school career and technical education course-taking and later enrollment in postsecondary education. 

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018043&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Reports
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF FRANK
AIELLO


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

     In connection with the Periodic Report of Cal Alta Auto Glass,
Inc.,(the "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Frank Aiello,  President of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the
Company.

Date: August 8, 2007                By: /s/ Frank Aiello
                                        -------------------
                                            Frank Aiello
                                            President/CEO/Principal
Accounting Officer/ Dir.
----

----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |

| Dated:      December 12, 2008                         |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|  /s/      Dongliang Su                                |   |   |   |
| Dongliang      SuActing      Chief Financial Officer  |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated March 16, 2010, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 24, 2010, (75 FR 14190), Archimica, Inc., 2460 W. Bennett Street, Springfield, Missouri 65807-1229, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule I.                

The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substance in bulk for sale to its customers.

One comment and objection was received. However, after a thorough review of this matter, DEA has concluded that the issues raised in the comment and objection do not warrant the denial of this application.

                    DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Archimica, Inc., to manufacture the listed basic class of controlled substance is consistent with                           ( print page 69468)                        the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Archimica, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.                

Dated: November 1, 2010.

 Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-28520 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
§ 1755.402 Ground resistance measurements. ( a ) The resistance of the central office (CO) and the remote switching terminal (RST) ground shall be measured before and after it has been bonded to the master ground bar (MGB) where it is connected to the building electric service ground.
( b ) The ground resistance of electronic equipment such as span line repeaters, carrier terminal equipment, concentrators, etc. shall be measured.
( c ) *Method of measurement.* The connection of test equipment for the ground resistance measurement shall be as shown in Figure 1. Refer to RUS Bulletin 1751F-802, “Electrical Protection Grounding Fundamentals,” for a comprehensive discussion of ground resistance measurements.
( d ) *Test equipment.* The test equipment for making this measurement is shown in Figure 1 as follows:
( e ) *Applicable results.* ( 1 ) For the CO and RST, the resistance after the bond has been made to the MGB electric service ground shall not exceed 5 ohms. Where the measured ground resistance exceeds 5 ohms, the borrower shall determine what additional grounding, if any, shall be provided.
( 2 ) For electronic equipment, the ground resistance shall not exceed 25 ohms. Where the measured ground resistance exceeds 25 ohms, the borrower shall determine what additional grounding, if any, shall be provided.
( 3 ) When ground resistance measurements exceed the ground resistance requirements of paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section, refer to RUS Bulletin 1751F-802, “Electrical Protection Grounding Fundamentals,” for suggested methods of reducing the ground resistance.
( f ) *Data record.* Results of the CO and RST ground resistance measurements shall be recorded. A suggested format similar to Format I, Outside Plant Acceptance Tests—Subscriber Loops, in § 1755.407 or a format specified in the applicable construction contract may be used. Results of the electronic equipment ground resistance measurements shall be recorded. A suggested format similar to Format II, Outside Plant Acceptance Tests—Trunk Circuits, in § 1755.407 or a format specified in the applicable construction contract may be used. Data showing approximate moisture content of the soil at the time of measurement, the temperature, the type of soil and a description of the test equipment used shall also be included.
( g ) *Probable causes for nonconformance.* Refer to RUS Bulletin 1751F-802, “Electrical Protection Grounding Fundamentals,” and Telecommunications Engineering and Construction Manual (TE&CM) Section 810, “Electrical Protection of Electronic Analog and Digital Central Office Equipment,” for possible causes of nonconformance and suggested methods for corrective action.
[62 FR 23960, May 2, 1997]
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter  Ended  November 30, 2008 (the  "Report") by
Futura Pictures, Inc. ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.




January 9, 2009                        By:   /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                             --------------------------
                                             Buddy Young
                                             Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Rose Klausner, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Herlihy, J.

Appeal

by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which denied benefits on the ground that the claimant left her employment without good cause. The claimant testified'that as a result of a change in the work system in her department she was unable to handle the work and she was not given sufficient assistance, that by reason thereof she was subjected to pressure, tension and aggravation which she feared would endanger her health and therefore she left her job. She did not consult a doctor. The Referee determined that this did not constitute good cause for leaving her position and the board affirmed such determination. (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 1, par. [a].) It was within the board’s province to determine the weight and credibility of claimant’s testimony and we cannot, upon this record, disturb its finding that good cause was not shown. *(Matter of Fusfeld*[Catherwood], 19 A D 2d 678.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum decision by Herlihy, J.
#### §§ 1724.75-1724.99 [Reserved]
#### Donna L. Bishop, Respondent, v William R. Sumner, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered January 20, 1978 in Chenango County, upon a verdict rendered at a Trial Term, in favor of plaintiff. At about 7:30 p.m. in the evening of April 15, 1975, plaintiff was riding as a passenger on defendant’s 1974 Honda 750 motorcycle. They were proceeding northerly on East River Road at a speed of about 50 miles per hour, according to defendant, or 60 miles per hour, according to plaintiff. It was dark, but the night was clear and moonlit. Plaintiff testified that, as they were proceeding along the road, she saw a deer facing east near the left side of the road about 300 feet ahead. Defendant testified he saw the deer facing west near the shoulder of the road when the headlight of the motorcycle reflected off its eyes. On cross-examination, plaintiff testified that the deer was about half the length of a football field away when she first saw it. As they approached the deer, it bolted into the road, and defendant veered to the left into the southbound lane, and accelerated in an effort to avoid the animal. The deer brushed defendant’s right leg and came in contact with plaintiff’s right arm, resulting in an injury to the arm. Defendant managed to keep the motorcycle upright, and he returned to the northbound lane where he slowed down to about 25 miles per hour, and plaintiff told him that her arm was injured. They then proceeded immediately to the hospital. Defendant, as an operator of a motorcycle, had a legal duty to operate his vehicle at a speed that was reasonable and prudent under conditions with regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. The evidence established that plaintiff apprehended defendant’s speed as dangerous, and plaintiff tapped defendant as a pre-arranged signal for defendant to slow down. Defendant admitted that he could have stopped, but, instead, decided to outrun the deer. Defendant further admitted that he lived in the area of the accident for 24 years of his life, and was familiar with the hazard of deer on the roadway. The evidence clearly established that defendant was traveling at an imprudent rate of speed prior to the accident, and the entire record supports the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Greenblott, J. P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.29


PROMISSORY NOTE COMBINATION #6 EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


 


 


This Promissory
Note Combination #6 Extension Agreement, hereinafter referred to as “Combination #6 Extension”, entered into this Sixteenth
day of November, 2012, by and among Intellinetics, Inc, hereinafter called “Maker” and Alpharion Capital Partners,
hereinafter called “Lender”.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender have entered into a Promissory Note Combination #6 dated October 2, 2012 for the amount of NINETY FOUR THOUSAND
and 00/100 DOLLARS ($94,000), hereinafter referred to as “Note Combination #6”. Said Note Combination #6 was originally
due on a due date of November 16, 2012.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender desire to enter into this Combination #6 Extension Agreement in order to extend the due date of the Note Combination
#6 for an additional thirty days to December 16, 2012.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
it is dually agreed by both Maker and Lender to extend the due date of the Note Combination #6 to December 16, 2012.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Maker and Lender
has duly executed this


Combination #6 Extension as of the day and year above
first written.


 


	 	INTELLINETICS,
    INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/William J. Santiago
	 	 
	 	ALPHARION CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/Rick Hughes
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/ssi/spotlights/spot-military-overseas.htm**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/ssi/spotlights/spot-military-overseas.htm**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Top of page

Skip to main content

Library of Congress

              - Discover
              - Services
              - Visit
              - Education
              - Connect
              - Shop *external link*
              - Donate
              - About
              - Ask a Librarian
              - Help
              - Contact
              - Search Online Catalog
              - Copyright.gov
              - Congress.gov

Library of Congress
Research Centers
Moving Image Research Center
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 167

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 32.1





PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly report of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sophocles Zoullas, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: May 10, 2011





/s/ Sophocles Zoullas


Sophocles Zoullas


Principal Executive Officer