alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



Date of report:       February 2, 1996



Pharmhouse Corp.
(Exact Name of Registrant)


	New York			                       1-7090			                  13-2634868
___________________         	____________________	         _______________
(State of Other 	         	(Commission File Number)	       (IRS Employer
Jurisdiction of                                          Identification Number)
Incorporation)


                  860 Broadway, New York, New York			   10003
            ____________________________________________________
            (Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)


      Registrant's telephone number, including area code:   (212) 477-9400




Item 5.  Other Events.

On January 11, 1996, pursuant to a Complaint filed in Supreme Court of the State
of New York New York Country (the "Complaint"), the Registrant instituted legal
proceedings against Woolworth Corporation and F.W. Woolworth Co. (collectively,
"Woolworth") seeking, among other relief, damages and indemnification arising
out of Woolworth's alleged fraud and breach of certain convenience,
representations and warranties made by Woolworth in connection with the
Registrant's acquisition in April 1995 (the "Acquisition", comprising 24 "The Rx
Place" deep discount drugstores (the "Acquired Stores").

As more fully described in the Complaint, the Registrant's claims in such
action are based upon its belief that it was wrongfully induced to overpay
for the assets acquired by it in the Acquisition by material
misrepresentations of Woolworth regarding the inventory and gross profit
margins of the Acquired Stores and that the Registrant has been damaged
substantially as a result thereof.

Pending resolution of the Registrant's claims in the above-described action,
the Registrant is withholding and intends to withhold payment of all further
installments of principal and interest arising under the Subordinated
Promissory Notes issued by the Registrant to F.W. Woolworth Co. (A portion
of the principal amount of which was previously prepaid by the Registrant) in
connection with the Acquisition (collectively, the "Purchase Money Notes").
The Registrant's senior secured and subordinated secured lenders have
consented to the withholding by the Registrant of payment of the January 1996
installments of principal and interest under the Purchase Money Notes and
have granted currently effective waivers of the relevant cross-default
provisions of the agreements evidencing the Registrant's indebtedness to such
lenders. 


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


PHARMHOUSE CORP.

By:  /s/  Richard A. Davis
       Name:   Richard A. Davis
       Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  February 2, 1996
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/27

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsGeneration and tooth contact analysis of spiral bevel gears with predesigned parabolic functions of transmission errorsA new approach for determination of machine-tool settings for spiral bevel gears is proposed. The proposed settings provide a predesigned parabolic function of transmission errors and the desired location and orientation of the bearing contact. The predesigned parabolic function of transmission errors is able to absorb piece-wise linear functions of transmission errors that are caused by the gear misalignment and reduce gear noise. The gears are face-milled by head cutters with conical surfaces or surfaces of revolution. A computer program for simulation of meshing, bearing contact and determination of transmission errors for misaligned gear has been developed.Document ID19900002717Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLitvin, Faydor L.*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL, United States)*Lee, Hong-Tao*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1989Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:4259NASA-CR-4259AVSCOM-TR-89-C-014E-4977AD-A217853Accession Number90N12033Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-783PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-51PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-62209-A-47-ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900002717.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 15.119 Objections.

Objections to evidence shall be timely and briefly state the ground relied upon. The ruling of the hearing officer will be part of the record. Argument in support of the objection will not be part of the record.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129713 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, ORGANIZATION OF SCHOOL Justices ADMINISTRATORS & SUPERVISORS, AFSA, AFL-CIO, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129713 COA: 262917 Wayne CC: 02-230638-CL DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Mark Tripp, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Easton-Bell Sports, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 14, 2006 /s/ Mark Tripp   Mark Tripp   Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                            NOV-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                              OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                        922,763
<SECURITIES>                                        0                                  
<RECEIVABLES>                               3,115,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (167,211)
<INVENTORY>                                 1,436,889
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            5,516,177
<PP&E>                                      6,909,120
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,902,592)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              9,425,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       4,767,203
<BONDS>                                             0                                     
<COMMON>                                       45,709
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                         
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                          0                                    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                9,425,716
<SALES>                                    22,385,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           22,385,643
<CGS>                                      12,919,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              20,886,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                5,046
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                              
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            112,244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,407,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                   20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,387,131
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                             
<CHANGES>                                           0                                   
<NET-INCOME>                                1,327,131
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.34
        



</TABLE>
#### § 15f.22 What happens after the hearing?

The ALJ will fix a reasonable time for filing posthearing briefs, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and if permitted, reply briefs. Briefs should include a summary of evidence relied upon together with references to exhibit numbers and citations to the transcript and authorities relied upon. Briefs must be filed with the Docketing Clerk with copies to all parties.
#### § 1488.16 Liability for payment.

If delivery is made within the coverage of the bank obligation(s) submitted in accordance with § 1488.8, CCC will look to the obligating bank or banks and the foreign importer, rather than to the exporter or intervening purchaser, for payment of all amounts due at maturity of the account receivable and of the bank obligation(s), but the exporter and the intervening purchaser shall remain liable for any loss arising from breach of any contractual obligation, certification or warranty made by them pursuant to the financing agreement, and the exporter shall remain liable for any amounts not covered by the bank obligation which are owing to CCC, and any remittance or refund required by § 1488.15 and § 1488.18, together with interest thereon at the rate specified in the documents evidencing the account receivable, as well as for any liquidated damages provided for in § 1488.11. The liability of the bank and the importer under their respective obligations shall be several.
#### William C. Carlisle, Appellant-Respondent, v County of Nassau, Respondent-Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of an alleged assault, arrest without proper cause, and use of excessive force by an employee of the defendant, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 13, 1979, which granted plaintiff’s renewed motion for leave to file an amended complaint to the extent of permitting an increase of the *ad damnum*clause and denied said motion insofar as it sought to add a cause of action alleging negligence. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and renewed motion granted to the extent of permitting plaintiff to add a cause of action alleging negligence and motion denied to the extent that plaintiff may not increase the *ad damnum*clause. The plaintiff should have been granted leave to amend his complaint so as to include a claim alleging negligence. The original complaint put the defendant on "notice of the transactions, occurrences, or series of transactions or occurrences, to be proved pursuant to the amended pleading” (CPLR 203, subd [e]). The same transaction which gave rise to the original claim of assault, the confrontation between the plaintiff and the defendant’s employee, a police officer, is at the base of the amended claim alleging negligence. The defendant was given sufficient notice, at the time of the original complaint, of the acts of which the plaintiff is now complaining (see *Watso v City of New York,*39 AD2d 960). Special Term erred, however, in granting the plaintiff’s request to increase the *ad damnum*clause. Although this court has stated that to be successful *594on a motion to increase an *ad damnum*clause it is not necessary to allege recently discovered, new or aggravated injuries *(Gold v Huntington Town House, 64*AD2d 885; *Koupash v Grand Union Co.,*34 AD2d 695), and that such a motion may be granted upon a showing of an update *(Hillenbrand v 3801 Review Place,*72 AD2d 554) or re-evaluation of the injuries *(Wagner v Huntington Hosp.,*65 AD2d 771), plaintiff here has failed to make such a showing. Plaintiff’s physical condition has been unchanged since the commencement of this action, nearly 13 years ago. There has been no reevaluation of those injuries. The actuary’s affidavit indicating an increase in the plaintiff’s pecuniary loss is merely indicative of our ever rising inflation rate, and that alone will not be a sufficient basis for an increase in an *ad damnum*clause. Plaintiff’s request for an increase should have been denied. Rabin, J. P., Margett, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Report: Fulfilling America’s Future: Latinas in the U.S., 2015

This report (PDF, 29 pages) highlights the condition of Hispanic girls and women in the United States and their participation in areas such as education, health, labor, housing, and politics. 

http://www.ed.gov/edblogs/hispanic-initiative/files/2015/09/Fulfilling-Americas-Future-Latinas-in-the-U.S.-2015-Final-Report.pdf?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1923 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1923

    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the 
    eligibility of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for 
 designation for participation in the visa waiver program for certain 
                     visitors to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2013

 Mr. Amodei (for himself, Ms. Chu, Ms. Titus, Mr. Heck of Nevada, Mr. 
  Horsford, Mr. Grimm, Ms. Gabbard, Mr. Schock, and Mrs. Napolitano) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for the 
    eligibility of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for 
 designation for participation in the visa waiver program for certain 
                     visitors to the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION FOR 
              DESIGNATION FOR PARTICIPATION IN VISA WAIVER PROGRAM FOR 
              CERTAIN VISITORS TO THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 217(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1187(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(12) Eligibility of certain region for designation as 
        program country.--The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 
        of the People's Republic of China--
                    ``(A) shall be eligible for designation as a 
                program country for purposes of this subsection; and
                    ``(B) may be designated as a program country for 
                purposes of this subsection if such region meets 
                requirements applicable for such designation in this 
                subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
SHARON KELLER

 PRESIDING JUDGE

BARBARA P. HERVEY

BERT RICHARDSON

KEVIN P. YEARY

DAVID NEWELL

MARY LOU KEEL

SCOTT WALKER

MICHELLE M. SLAUGHTER

JESSE F. MCCLURE, III

 JUDGES

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

DEANA WILLIAMSON

CLERK

(512) 463-1551

SIAN SCHILHAB

GENERAL COUNSEL

(512) 463-1597

SUPREME COURT BUILDING, 201 WEST 14TH STREET, ROOM 106, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701

WEBSITE WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/CCA

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

11th Court of Appeals Clerk

Sherry Williamson

P. O. Box 271

Eastland, TX 76448

* Delivered Via E-Mail *

Re: Coppler, Noah Job

CCA No. PD-1009-19 COA No. 11-19-00146-CR

Trial Court Case No. 12719

The court has issued an opinion on the above referenced cause number.

Sincerely,

Deana Williamson, Clerk

cc: Presiding Judge 32nd District Court (Delivered Via E-Mail)

District Clerk Nolan County (Delivered Via E-Mail)

District Attorney Nolan County (Delivered Via E-Mail)

Stacey M. Soule (Delivered Via E-Mail)

Noah Job Coppler

FILE COPY
§ 1753.67 Contracts and specifications. ( a ) Equipment Contract, RUS Contract Form 395 shall be used to purchase equipment on a furnish-and-install basis, as well as on a furnish-only basis.
( b ) The equipment specifications must accompany the equipment contract form and each specification consists of performance specifications, installation requirements (if applicable), and application engineering requirements.
[81 FR 71584, Oct. 18, 2016]