alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Recent Event: 2016 U.S. Presidential Scholars      

# Recent Event: 2016 U.S. Presidential Scholars

This event honored 160 high school seniors as the 52nd class of U.S. Presidential Scholars. These students were recognized for their accomplishments in academics, the arts, and career and technical education fields.

http://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/160-students-across-country-named-2016-us-presidential-scholars?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00263-CR

TRENTON EUGENE SINYARD,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 40346CR

REINSTATEMENT ORDER

This appeal was abated to the trial court on October 24, 2018 because no brief had 

been filed for appellant. Appellant’s brief was received by the Court on November 2, 

2018. 

Accordingly, this appeal is reinstated. Appellant’s brief is filed as of the date it 

was received. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief, also filed 

on November 2, 2018, is dismissed as moot.

The State’s brief in this appeal is due 30 days from the date of this Order.

PER CURIAM
Sinyard v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal reinstated

Motion dismissed

Order issued and filed November 14, 2018
§ 1720.5 Eligibility criteria. ( a ) To be eligible to participate in the program, a guaranteed lender must be: ( 1 ) A bank or other lending institution organized as a private, not-for-profit cooperative association, or otherwise organized on a non-profit basis; and
( 2 ) Able to demonstrate to the Secretary that it possesses the appropriate expertise, experience, and qualifications to make loans for utility infrastructure purposes.
( b ) To be eligible to receive a guarantee, a guaranteed lender's bond must meet the following criteria: ( 1 ) The guaranteed lender must furnish the Secretary with a certified list of the principal balances of eligible loans then outstanding and certify that such aggregate balance is at least equal to the sum of the proposed principal amount of guaranteed bonds to be issued, and any previously issued guaranteed bonds outstanding; and
( 2 ) The guaranteed bonds to be issued by the guaranteed lender must receive an underlying investment grade rating from a rating agency, without regard to the guarantee. If an applicant has no outstanding RUS guarantees or has outstanding aggregate guarantees of less than $25 million, the Administrator may prescribe in advance by notice an alternate method for the guaranteed lender to demonstrate creditworthiness.
( c ) A lending institution's status as an eligible applicant does not assure that the Secretary will issue the guarantee sought in the amount or under the terms requested, or otherwise preclude the Secretary from declining to issue a guarantee.
[69 FR 63049, Oct. 29, 2004, as amended at 75 FR 42574, July 22, 2010; 87 FR 74500, Dec. 6, 2022]
#### Juan F. EVANS, petitioner, v. Lewis KILLIAN, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, et al.

No. 07-6960.

Jan. 7, 2008.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
#### In the Matter of the Board of Education of the Union Free School District No. 11, Town of Hempstead, Appellant, v. Ewald P. Nyquist, as Acting Commissioner of Education, et al., Respondents.

Respondents.— Motions for an adjournment and a stay of enforcement of the determination under review pending appeal denied, without costs. Respondent receiver of taxes is directed to retain custody of funds in dispute subject to further order of this court, without prejudice to a temporary investment of such funds in a special time deposit or certificates of deposit authorized by section 11 of the General Municipal Law, upon duly adopted resolution of both appellant and respondent boards of education authorizing such investment. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1872
CLEVEN LEWIS ROBERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA05-408-JFM) Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 26, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cleven Lewis Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Cleven Lewis Roberson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Roberson’s complaint filed under the Social Security Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Roberson v. Barnhart , No. CA-05-408-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FEDERAL FINANCIAL REPORT ATTACHMENT

(For reporting multiple grants)

1. Federal Agency and Organizational Element 2. Recipient Organization (Box 3 on Page 1)

 to Which Report is Submitted (Box 1 on Page 1)

3a. DUNS Number (Box 4a on Page 1) 4. Reporting Period End Date (Box 9 on Page 1)

 (Month, Day, Year)

3b. EIN (Box 4b on Page 1) Page __________ of _________

5. List Information below for each grant covered by this report. Use additional pages if more space is required.

Federal Grant Number Recipient Account Number Cumulative Federal Cash Disbursement

$

TOTAL (Should correspond to the amount on Line 10b on Page 1) $ 0.00

Standard Form 425A

OMB Approval Number: 0348-0061

Expiration Date: 10/31/2011

Paperwork Burden Statement

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act, as amended, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The valid 

OMB control number for this information collection is 0348-0061. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average thirty (30) minutes per response, 

including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. 

Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management 

and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project ( 0348-0061), Washington, DC 20503.
Exhibit 32.2 - Director Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of My Quote Zone, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, Mark Theis, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark Theis
-------------------
    Mark Theis
    Director


Date  February 13, 2006
      -----------------
**Exhibit 10.53**

 

March 7, 2005

 

 

Mr. DennisC. Simonis, President

Membersof the Board of Directors

MLResources, Inc.

26-238Hawaii Belt Road
| Hilo, HI 96720 | OUR REFERENCE  NO.:  056812-1 |
|----------------|-------------------------------|

 

Re:                               Audit Committee

 

Gentlemen:

 

The New York Stock Exchangehas advised the Company that:

 

(1)     I cannot serveon the Audit Committee because our firm performs legal services for theCompany.  Nevertheless, I can attend allmeetings of the Audit Committee in my capacity as an attorney as long as I amnot a voting member of the Committee.

 

(2)     Furthermore, Iam independent as far as serving as a director and member of the Governance andNominating Committees.

 

(3)     Therefore:

 

(1)     I  resign my position as a member ofthe Audit Committee effective immediately.

 

(2)     I will continueto serve as an attorney for the Company, director, and member of theGovernance, Nominating, and Compensation Committees at the pleasure of theBoard of Directors.

 
|   | Sincerely,        |
|--------|-------------------|
|   |              |
|   |              |
|   | /s/ James H. Case |   |
|   |              |
|   | James H. Case     |

 

1

----
Exhibit 10.1



 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment
to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), made effective as of April 12, 2013, is entered into by Intercept
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) and Barbara Duncan (“Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Executive are parties to an Employment Agreement dated May 16, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to provide for enhanced severance benefits in the event of certain terminations
of Executive’s employment;


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration
of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Amendment, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged by the parties to this Amendment, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.Section 5.2(a)
of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


“(a)twelve
(12) months of Executive’s base salary in effect at the time of termination of employment, payable according to the Company’s
payroll commencing; and”


 


2.Section 5.2(b)
of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


“(b)the
Company will, for a period of twelve (12) months following Executive’s termination from employment, continue Executive’s
participation in the Company’s group health plan and shall pay that portion of the premiums that the Company paid on behalf
of Executive during Executive’s employment, provided, however, that if the Company’s health insurance
plan does not permit such continued participation in such plan after Executive’s termination of employment, then the Company
shall pay the costs of COBRA continuation coverage on Executive’s behalf for such twelve-month period; and provided,
further, that if Executive becomes employed with another employer during the period in which continued health insurance
is being provided pursuant to this Section, the Company shall not be required to continue such health benefits, or if applicable,
to pay the costs of COBRA, if Executive becomes covered under a health insurance plan of the new employer. (For purposes of this
Section 5.2(b), the term “Executive” shall include, to the extent applicable, Executive’s spouse and any of
her dependents covered under the Company’s group health plan prior to her termination of employment.)”


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


3. Other than as set forth in this Amendment,
there are no other amendments to the Employment Agreement and the Employment Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force
and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 





	 	THE COMPANY:
	 	 
	 	INTERCEPT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 /s/ Mark Pruzanski
	 	Name:  	Mark Pruzanski, MD
	 	Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE:
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 /s/ Barbara Duncan
	 	Name:	Barbara Duncan
FORM
6-K

SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,
D. C. 20549




---

REPORT
OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

Pursuant
to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For
the month of January 2003

Commission
File Number: 000-12713




---

NEC
CORPORATION

(Translation
of registrant's name into English)




---

7-1,
Shiba 5-chome Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

(Address
of principal executive offices)




---




Form 20-F  [ X ]      Form 40-F [     ]

Yes  [     ]      No [ X ]



---

SIGNATURE



NEC
CORPORATION(Registrant)By:


/S/
    KAZUHIKOYOSHIZUMIKazuhiko
Yoshizumi
Chief
Manager, Legal Divison




---












---



January 7, 2003

Press Release



Contact:
Daniel Mathieson
Corporate Communication Division
NEC Corporation
TEL:81-3-3798-6511
d-mathieson@bu.jp.nec.com



NEC
to sell all of its holdings in Sumitomo 3M Limited



Tokyo
	January 7, 2003 – NEC Corporation ("NEC")
	(NASDAQ:NIPNY) (FTSE:6701q.1) announced today that NEC decided to
	sell all of its holdings in Sumitomo 3M Limited ("Sumitomo
	3M"), as part of NEC's plan to downsize its balance
	sheet.  Details of the transaction are as follows.  The transaction
	will not affect the business relationship between Sumitomo 3M and
	NEC.



1.
	Shares to be sold

(1)
	NEC's holdings in Sumitomo 3M before sale:    6,572,664 shares
	(25%)

(2)
	Number of shares to be sold by NEC:    6,572,664 shares

(3)
	NEC's holdings in Sumitomo 3M after sale:    None



2.
	Purchaser

Nadco
	(Japan) Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of 3M Company, which is the
	parent company of Sumitomo 3M).

3.
	Type of transaction

Cash
	transaction

4.
	Price

45
	billion yen

5.
	Date of sale

Scheduled
	for January 8, 2003

6.
	Effect on NEC's financial results for the fiscal year
	ending March 31, 2003

NEC
is expected to record certain capital gain as a result of the sale of
shares.  However, the estimated amount of the capital gain has been
reflected in and will not affect the forecasts of NEC's
financial results for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2003, which
was announced on October 25, 2002.
§ 1753.56 General. ( a ) This subpart implements and explains the provisions of the loan documents setting forth the requirements and the procedures to be followed by borrowers for outside plant major construction by the force account method with RUS loan funds. Terms used in this subpart are defined in § 1753.2 and RUS Contract Form 515.
( b ) A borrower shall not use the force account method for construction financed with loan funds unless prior RUS approval has been obtained.
( c ) Generally, RUS will not approve the force account method for major outside plant construction for the initial loan to a borrower.
( d ) The Force Account Proposals (FAPs) are subject to review and approval by RUS.
( e ) The FAP is approved by RUS on the basis of estimated labor and material costs. The FAP is closed based on the borrower's actual cost of performing the construction. RUS will provide loan funds only up to the amount determined by the completed assembly units priced at the unit prices in the approved FAP.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0572-0062)
EXHIBIT 23.1










INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT









We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Datawatch Corporation on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-134291, 333-134015, 333-104011, 333-84312, 333-57244, 333-34312 and 333-39627) of our report dated December 17, 2010, with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Datawatch Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2010 and for the year then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Datawatch Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2010.






/s/ Marcum LLP


Marcum LLP




Boston, Massachusetts


December 17, 2010
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: New Tobacco Product Regulations      

# Resource: New Tobacco Product Regulations

These regulations extend FDA authority to regulate all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, hookah, and cigars. According to the new rules, retailers will no longer be able to sell e-cigarettes, cigars, or other covered tobacco products to anyone under age 18 and all tobacco sales to those 26 and under will require photo identification.

http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/Labeling/RulesRegulationsGuidance/ucm388395.htm?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JESUS ANTONIO RAMOS

CERVANTES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50521

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00358-JFW-1

Central District of California, 

Los Angeles

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

Before: PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

The opinion filed May 16, 2012, is amended as follows:

The attached photograph shall be inserted at the end of Slip Op. 5215

and entitled “Appendix A.”

FILED

MAY 17 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
** **

**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of M.L. Macadamia Orchards, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersignedmanagement of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that,

 

(3)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(4)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Partnership.

 

 
| /s/ Wayne W.  Roumagoux  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
| Wayne W.  Roumagoux      |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer |   |
| March 20,  2008     |   |

 

----
EX-10.77



 Exhibit 10.77 
 06/19/92 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO MASTER AGREEMENT 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO MASTER AGREEMENT (“Second Amendment”) is made as of the 15 day of July, 1992 by and
between Inter-Regional Financial Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“IFG”), and Brookfield Development California Inc., a California corporation (“BDC”). 
 RECITALS 
 IFG and BCED Minnesota Inc., a Minnesota corporation
(“BCED”), are parties to a certain Master Agreement (the “Master Agreement”) dated as February 6, 1989. 
 BCED transferred the real property which is subject to the Master Agreement to BDC and assigned its interests under the Master Agreement to BDC. 

IFG and BDC are parties to an Amendment to Master Agreement (the “First Amendment”) dated as of August 1, 1991. IFG and
BDC desire to further amend the Master Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, IFG and BDC hereby agree as follows: 

1.        The second sentence of Section 3.1 of the First Amendment is hereby amended and
restated to provide as follows: 
 IFG shall make such selection and give written notice thereof to BDC on or prior to
August 1, 1994, failing which BDC and I FG shall have no further obligation or liability under this Section 3. 

2.        Except as set forth herein, the Master Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, is
unmodified and in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, BDC and IFG have executed this Second Amendment as of the date first set
forth above. 
  

					
	INTER-REGIONAL FINANCIAL GROUP,
	INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Authorized Signatory
		 	Its	 	        Exec. VP
	
	BROOKFIELD DEVELOPMENT CALIFORNIA
	INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Authorized Signatory
		 	Its	 	        VICE PRESIDENT
	And:	 	    /s/ Authorized Signatory
		 	Its	 	        ASSISTANT SECRETARY



  
 -2-









 CONSENT 
 The Toronto-Dominion Bank, a Canadian chartered bank acting through its Grand Cayman Islands B.W.I. Branch (“Lender”), hereby consents to the foregoing Second Amendment to Master Agreement
between Brookfield Development California Inc. and Inter-Regional Financial Group, Inc. 
  

													
		 		 	THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK, Acting	  	
		 		 	Through its Grand Cayman Islands,	  	
		 		 	B.W.I. Branch	  	
					
		 		 	By:	  	/s/ Authorized Signatory	  	
		 		 		  	Its  ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER	  		  	


  
 -3-