alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1755.98 List of telecommunications specifications included in other 7 CFR parts.

The following specifications are included throughout 7 CFR chapter XVII. These specifications are not incorporated by reference elsewhere in the chapter. The terms “RUS form,” “RUS standard form,” “RUS specification,” and “RUS bulletin” have the same meaning as the terms “REA form,” “REA standard form,” “REA specification,” and “REA bulletin,” respectively, unless otherwise indicated. The list of specifications follows:

| Section | Issue date | Title |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (a) 1728.202 | 4.18.2022 | RUS Specification for Quality Control and Inspection of Timber Products. |
| (b) [Reserved] | | |

[55 FR 39397, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 84 FR 28201, June 18, 2019; 86 FR 57022, Oct. 14, 2021; 87 FR 26963, May 6, 2022]
EX-10.1(b)



 Exhibit 10.1(b) 
 June 1, 2012 
 Waypoint Capital Management 

23 Green St. – Suite 210 
 Huntington, N.Y.
11743 
 Attention: Mr. Robert Calabretta 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Calabretta: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made
below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 CTA Capital LLC 



	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Waypoint Master Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian Centner
		 	Brian Centner
		 	Chief Financial Officer and Director
	
	WAYPOINT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
		
	By:            	 	/s/ Robert Calabretta


			
		
	 Print Name:
	 	  Robert Calabretta
		
	 BC/sr
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

9 a.m. (Eastern Time) November 16, 2010.

# PLACE: 

4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

# STATUS: 

Parts will be open to the public and parts will be closed to the public. 

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Parts Open to the Public

1. Approval of the minutes of the October 18, 2010 Board Member Meeting.

2. Thrift Savings Plan Activity Report by the Executive Director.

 a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.

 b. Monthly Investment Performance Review.

 c. Legislative Report.

## Parts Closed to the Public

3. Confidential Data.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

Dated: November 8, 2010.

Thomas K. Emswiler,

Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-28534 Filed 11-8-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
Exhibit 23.1

NSAI  NETHERLAND, SEWELL
      & ASSOCIATES, INC.




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

        As independent oil and gas consultants, Netherland, Sewell & Associates,
Inc., hereby consents to: (a) the use of our report setting forth our estimates
of proved reserves and future revenue, as of December 31, 1999, to the interest
of American Resources Offshore, Inc. in certain oil and gas properties; and (b)
all references to our firm included in or made a part of Blue Dolphin Energy
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                           NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
                                           By: /s/ FREDERIC D. SEWELL
                                                   Frederic D. Sewell

                                           Its:    PRESIDENT


Dallas, Texas
March 29, 2000
EX-4.13



 Exhibit 4.13 
 Supplementary Agreement to the Amended and Restated Equity Pledge Agreement 
 Pledgee:
Beijing Dangdang Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
 Pledgor: 
 Name: Peggy Yu Yu, 
 Identification Card No.: 

Name: Guoqing Li 
 Identification Card No.: 
 (Peggy Yu Yu and Guoqing Li are hereinafter referred to collectively as
the “Pledgors”.) 
 With respect to the Amended and Restated Equity Pledge Agreement entered into by and between the Pledgee and the
Pledgors as of July 23, 2010 (the “Original Agreement”), upon mutual consultation, the Pledgee and the Pledgors hereby agree as follows in Beijing, PRC on December 30, 2012: 

 

	 	1.	Article 10 of the Original Agreement is hereby modified as: 

 “Article 10: Termination 
 This Agreement shall terminate
upon the Pledgee’s exclusive call option has been fully exercised, and the Pledgee shall cancel or terminate this Agreement as soon as reasonably practicable. If any of the other agreements has been terminated, then this Agreement may be
terminated by the Pledgee.” 
  

	 	2.	The other provisions of the Original Agreement shall remain unchanged. This Agreement shall be executed in three (3) counterparts, each Party holding one
(1) original. 

 [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank] 







 [Execution Page] 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties or their respective authorized representative have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date and in the place first above written. 

Pledgee: Beijing Dangdang Information Technology Co., Ltd. 
  

					
	Authorized representative	 	(signature):	 	/s/ Guoqing Li
		 	(stamp):	 	

  

					
	Pledgor:	 	Peggy Yu Yu	 	Guoqing Li
			
		 	Signature: /s/ Peggy Yu Yu	 	Signature: /s/ Guoqing Li

  

  
 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In re Guardianship of Sonya M. Hawley. ) ___________________________________ ) ) JAMES BATTERSON and PAMELA ) ARMSTRONG, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-3260 ) ROBERT M. ELLIOTT, as Limited ) Guardian of the Person and Plenary ) Guardian of the Property for Sonya M. ) Hawley, and as Trustee for the Sonya M. ) Hawley Revocable Trust dated June 17, ) 1997, and Successor Trustee for the ) Sonya M. Hawley Revocable Trust ) dated December 6, 2013, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed January 6, 2016.

A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Deno G. Economou, Judge.

John J. Waskom and Mark Dungan of Icard, Merrill, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsburg, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellants.

Logan Elliott of Elliott Law, P.A., Bradenton; and Erika Dine and Sierra Pino of Dine Law, P.L., Bradenton, for Appellee.- 2 - CASANUEVA, Judge.

James Batterson and Pamela Armstrong challenge an order removin g

Pamela Armstrong as trustee of the Sonya M. Hawley Revocable Tr ust dated

December 6, 2013, and removing her as limited guardian of the p erson of Sonya M.

Hawley. We conclude that the trial court had the authority to enter the order pursuant to

section 744.1075(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2013), where it found that such action was

necessary to protect the physical or mental health or property of Ms. Hawley. However,

upon entering this order, the trial court was required to compl y with section

744.1075(4)(a), which provides as follows:

If the court finds probable caus e, the court shall issue an order to show cause directed to the guardian or other respondent stating the essential facts constituting the conduct charged and requiring the respondent to appear
before the court to show cause why the court should not take
further action.

We therefore remand this case for the trial court to conduct fu rther

proceedings consistent with section 744.1075(4)(a). We note th at on remand, the order

to show cause must "specify the time and place of the hearing w ith a reasonable time to

allow for the preparation of a defense after service of the ord er." 1 See id.

Affirmed; cause remanded with directions.

SILBERMAN and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

1 The parties are cautioned against engaging in protracted unnece ssary litigation at the ward's expense.
Larry Greene AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICER

777 12th Street, 3rd Floor * Sacramento, CA 95814-1908 

916/874-4800 * 916/874-4899 fax 

www.airquality.org 

June 14, 2012 

Mr. Michael Guzzetta 

Stationary Source Division 

California Air Resources Board 

PO Box 2815 

Sacramento, CA 95812 

Subject: State Implementation Plan Revision, SMAQMD Rule 417 

Dear Mr. Guzzetta: 

Enclosed is the information necessary for submittal of Rule 417, Wood Burning Appliances, for 

revision to the State Implementation Plan. Rule 417 was adopted by the District’s Board of 

Directors on October 26, 2006, and reduces the emissions of particulate matter from wood 

burning appliances. Please also forward the information for this submittal to U.S. EPA. Thank 

you. 

If you have any comments or questions, please contact me at (916) 874-4851. 

Sincerely, 

Kevin J. Williams, Ph.D. 

Program Coordinator 

(sent via e-mail) 

c: Alex Krichevsky, CARB 

Attachments: 

1. SIP Checklist 

2. Rule 417, Final Version 

3. Public Notice Evidence 

4. Resolution 

5. Public Comments 

6. Rule 417 Evaluation Form 

7. Staff Report (includes responses to comments)
§ 15a.510 Recruitment. ( a ) *Nondiscriminatory recruitment and hiring.* A recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in the recruitment and hiring of employees. Where a recipient has been found to be presently discriminating on the basis of sex in the recruitment or hiring of employees, or has been found to have so discriminated in the past, the recipient shall recruit members of the sex so discriminated against so as to overcome the effects of such past or present discrimination.
( b ) *Recruitment patterns.* A recipient shall not recruit primarily or exclusively at entities that furnish as applicants only or predominantly members of one sex if such actions have the effect of discriminating on the basis of sex in violation of §§ 15a.500 through 15a.550.
2006-0631.

#### McCormick v. Jeffreys.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Major McCormick. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1344

___________

Kenneth Kenley, *

*

Petitioner/Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Donald Roper, Superintendent Potosi * [PUBLISHED]

Correctional Center, *

*

Respondent/Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: February 4, 2003

Filed: February 4, 2003

___________

Before BOWMAN, MORRIS S. ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Before us is Kenneth Kenley's federal habeas claim that he has been subjected

to cruel and unusual punishment because 1) the Missouri Department of Corrections

has been deliberately indifferent to his safety by exposing him to the hepatitis C virus

and to his health by failing to properly treat his hepatitis C infection, and 2) he is

incompetent to be executed under the standard enunciated in Ford v. Wainwright, 477

U.S. 399 (1986). 
-2-

The district court dismissed Kenley's hepatitis C claims finding the claims not

cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm the district court's dismissal of those

claims. 

The district court found Kenley's Ford competency claim to be a second or

successive habeas petition, and correctly noted that no application had been made to

the court of appeals for authorization to bring such a petition. The district court

therefore concluded that it lacked authorization to consider the merits of the claim.

Instead, the district court transferred the claim to this court. 

We think the district court erred in concluding Kenley's competency claim

amounts to a second or successive petition. Kenley's petition challenges the

execution of his sentence, not his conviction, and could not have been raised in his

first habeas petition because it was not ripe. See Crouch v. Norris, 251 F.3d 720, 724

(8th Cir. 2001); see also Scott v. Mitchell, 250 F.3d 1011, 1013 (6th Cir. 2001)

(holding Ford claim was not second or successive petition because it was not ripe at

time petitioner filed initial habeas petition). 

Because of the urgency of the matter, we now address the merits of Kenley's

competency claim rather than remanding to the district court. In his pleadings,

Kenley argues he is unable to discuss and comprehend the reasons that his

punishment should not be carried out. Kenley concedes, however, that he

understands the nature and purpose of the punishment to which he is subject. He

therefore has not stated a valid Ford claim. See Rector v. Clark, 923 F.2d 570 (8th

Cir. 1991) ("the Ford majority found the Eighth Amendment prevented the execution

of 'one whose mental illness prevents him from comprehending the reasons for the

penalty or its implications.'") (citing Ford, 477 U.S. at 417). Additionally, because

the medications he is receiving are voluntary, there is no issue of forced medication

to assure competency. Accordingly, habeas relief on this claim is denied. 
-3-

Kenley's motion for a stay of execution is also denied. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 13, 2009 |   | /s/      Yale Farar                                                                             |   |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Yale      Farar, President(Principal      Executive Officer)                                    |   |
|                         |   |                                                                                            |   |
|                         |   |                                                                                            |   |
| Date:      November 13, 2009 |   | /s/      Mitchell W. Turk                                                                       |   |
|                         |   | Mitchell      W. Turk, Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |
|                         |   |                                                                                            |   |
|                         |   |                                                                                            |   |
|                         |   |                                                                                            |   |
|                         |   |                                                                                            |   |

----
# 2015 Plan for the 1997

PM2.5 Standard

San	Joaquin	Valley	Unified	Ai r	Pollution	Control	DistrictThis page intentionally blank.
#### § 160.8 Steam distilled wood turpentine.

The designation “steam distilled wood turpentine” shall refer to the kind of spirits of turpentine obtained by steam distillation from the oleoresinous component of wood whether in the presence of the wood or after extraction from the wood, and commonly known prior to the passage of the act as wood turpentine, steam distilled turpentine, steam distilled wood turpentine, or S. D. wood turpentine.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1865 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 35 Park Street in Danville, Vermont, as the 

‘‘Thaddeus Stevens Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1865 EH

1 SECTION 1. THADDEUS STEVENS POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 35 Park Street in Danville, 

4 Vermont, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Thad5 deus Stevens Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Thaddeus Stevens 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1865 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postfice’’. Vermont, as the ‘‘Thaddeus Stevens Post Of- al Service located at 35 Park Street in Danville,
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1450.7 Division of payments and provisions about tenants and sharecroppers. ( a ) Payments received under this part will be divided as specified in the applicable contract. CCC may refuse to enter into a contract when there is a disagreement among persons or legal entities seeking enrollment as to a person's or legal entity's eligibility to participate in the contract as a tenant or sharecropper, and there is insufficient evidence, as determined by CCC, to indicate whether the person or legal entity seeking participation as a tenant or sharecropper has an interest in the acreage offered for enrollment in the BCAP.
( b ) CCC may remove an operator or tenant from a BCAP contract when: ( 1 ) The operator or tenant requests in writing to be removed from the BCAP contract;
( 2 ) The operator or tenant files for bankruptcy and the trustee or debtor in possession fails to affirm the contract, to the extent permitted by applicable bankruptcy laws;
( 3 ) The operator or tenant dies during the contract period and the administrator of the estate fails to succeed to the contract within a period of time determined appropriate by CCC; or
( 4 ) A court of competent jurisdiction orders the removal of the operator or tenant from the BCAP contract and such order is received by CCC.
( c ) Tenants who fail to maintain tenancy on the acreage under contract for any reason may be removed from a contract by CCC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                       3001965515
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                      4901334498
<RECEIVABLES>                                 27742056
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                 1081205
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              4930157759
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                      25244933
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      4006631
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                           29251564
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                    2128447613
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                         57959184
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                         65952516
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                      5009937
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                      868297379
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                    1899151266
<NET-ASSETS>                                4900906195
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                             42229671
<INTEREST-INCOME>                             19907153
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                38048325
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                       24088499
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                     943646604
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (657712416)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        310022687
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                     19670553
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                     384359917
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        3201699
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                   15655897
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                            4460866
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     (718474002)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                         244740
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                    308912359
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                         34445024
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                               38048325
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                           5247354
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            85.20
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                    .39
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                           5.22
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                               .31
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         5.94
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              84.56
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                    .73


</TABLE>