alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |

| Dated: November      3, 2008                                                                  |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|  /s/      Yijun Wang                                                                          |   |   |   |
| Yijun      WangChief      Executive Officer, President, Director(Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
#### § 160.66 Fees for inspection services.

The Administrator shall from time to time establish fees and charges for examination, sampling, classification, grading, analysis and certification of naval stores as he may deem fair and reasonable, and commensurate with the cost of the service rendered. Such fees and charges may be announced to the trade in such manner as the Administrator considers practicable.
Nicor
Inc.


Form
10-K


Exhibit
32.02





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Nicor Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)           the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the twelve
month period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  February
      25, 2009
            
            /s/
      RICHARD L. HAWLEYRichard
      L. HawleyExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 12, 2008 | /s/                Yale Farar                                                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Yale                Farar, President(Principal                Executive Officer)                                                   |
|                                   |                                                                                                                               |
|                                   |                                                                                                                               |
| Date:                November 12, 2008 | /s/                Mitchell W. Turk                                                                                                |
|                                   | Mitchell                W. Turk, Chief Financial Officer(Principal                Financial and Accounting                Officer) |

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                     The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                     The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: November 12,  2010 | By:                                   | /s/ Michael R. Sapp |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                           | Michael R. Sapp                       |
|                           | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

s0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

148137

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148137

COA: 314384

Oakland CC: 2006

- 211649

- FH

KENNETH WAYNE RIDEAUX

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 8

, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
§ 15c.6 Compliance reviews. ( a ) USDA may conduct compliance reviews or use other similar procedures to review the activities of recipients to determine whether they are complying with the Age Act and this regulation and to investigate and address violations of the Age Act. USDA may conduct these reviews, at any time, even in the absence of a complaint against a recipient. The reviews may be as comprehensive as necessary to determine whether a violation of the Age Act or this regulation has occurred.
( b ) If a compliance review indicates a violation of the Age Act or this regulation, USDA shall attempt to achieve voluntary compliance with the Age Act. USDA shall monitor and evaluate a recipient's efforts to remedy a violation to ensure compliance consistent with applicable civil rights requirements until compliance has been achieved. If voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, USDA shall undertake enforcement of the Age Act and this regulation.
EXHIBIT 21.1

                    PrimeSource Healthcare, Inc. Subsidiaries


     1.     Cathtec, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (not operational).

     2.     Fiber Imaging Technologies,  Inc., a Massachusetts  corporation (not
            operational).

     3.     CardioDyne,   Incorporated,   a   Massachusetts   corporation   (not
            operational).

     4.     PrimeSource Surgical, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

     5.     Bimeco, Inc., a Florida corporation.

     6.     Ruby Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6633

DENOVER POSTELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN DOE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00106-JAG-DJN)

Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Denover Postell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Denover Postell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights 

complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with the court’s prior order directing 

Postell either to pay the initial partial filing fee or submit a sworn statement attesting to 

the unavailability of funds to make that payment. A plaintiff’s failure to comply with a 

court order may warrant involuntary dismissal. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We review such a 

dismissal for abuse of discretion. Davis v. Williams, 588 F.2d 69, 70 (4th Cir. 1978) 

(providing standard of review); see Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93, 95-96 (4th Cir.

1989) (noting that dismissal is the appropriate sanction where litigant disregarded court 

order despite warning that failure to comply with order would result in dismissal). 

Our review of the record reveals no evidence to establish that Postell filed a timely 

response to the court’s April 7, 2017, order, which specifically informed Postell that 

failure to comply could result in dismissal. We thus discern no abuse of discretion in the 

court’s decision to dismiss Postell’s complaint after he failed to comply with either aspect 

of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons 

stated by the district court. See Postell v. Doe, No. 3:17-cv-00106-JAG-DJN (E.D. Va. 

May 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1703.308 Amount of deferment funds available. ( a ) The total amount of deferments made available for each fiscal year under this program will not exceed 3 percent of the total payments due during fiscal year 1993 from all borrowers on direct loans and insured loans made under the RE Act. For each subsequent fiscal year after 1993, the total amount of deferments will not exceed 5 percent of the total payments due for the year from all borrowers on direct loans and insured loans.
( b ) The total amount of annual deferments are subject to limitations established by appropriations Acts.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Motorcycle Safety Month      

# Motorcycle Safety Month

May is Motorcycle Safety Month. This webpage provides materials and resources to promote motorcycle safety and reduce the number of fatalities and injuries on highways. The page contains a fact sheet, news releases, and sample social media posts.**Learn more.**
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7822

DONALD HARDING, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DEAN R. WALKER, Superintendent, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-140-5-1-MU) Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 27, 2001 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Harding, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donald Harding seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harding v. Walker , No. CA-00- 140-5-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 2000). We also deny Harding’s motion to compel preparation of a trial transcript. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NO. PD-0348-13

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court ofAppeals Distort

TYLER T

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEjAKSVTHY S. LU

OF TEXAS

LACHANCE CRUTCHFIELD, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

HENDERSON COUNTY

Per curiam. Keasler and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.

ORDER

The petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure

68.4(i) & 9.4(i)(2)(D) because it does not contain a copy ofthe opinion ofthe court of

appeals and the petition exceeds the proper length.

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must

be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty days after the date ofthis order.

Filed: July 24, 2013

Do not publish
Exhibit 10.8


  


5. AMENDMENT


 


This fifth amendment (“5. Amendment”)
dated as of December 31, 2012 (“Effective Date”) between Net Element, Inc (“Tenant”) and 1450 South Miami,
LLC (“Landlord”) amends that certain Lease Agreement for 1450 South Miami Avenue (the “Lease”) dated October
8, 2010 between Landlord and Tenant, the subsequent Amendment dated November 16, 2011, the 2. Amendment dated September 28, 2012,
the 3. Amendment dated October 31, 2012 and the 4. Amendment dated November 30, 2012. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meaning so proscribed in the Lease Agreement as well as in the Amendment, in the 2. Amendment, in the 3.
Amendment and in the 4. Amendment.


 


WHEREAS, the parties mutually agree to modify
certain terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement, the Amendment, the 2. Amendment, the 3. Amendment and the 4. Amendment.


 


WHEREAS, each Party acknowledges that as
of the Effective Date, to such Party’s knowledge, the other Party is not in material breach or Default pursuant to the terms
of the Lease Agreement, the Amendment, the 2. Amendment, the 3. Amendment and the 4. Amendment.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	Term extension. Tenant and Landlord agree to extend the term of the Lease until April 30, 2013 for the premises
in “as-is” condition. The Base Rent shall be the same as for January 2013 and be calculated as follows:



 


	 	 	 	 	 	PER SQFT	 	 	ANNUALLY	 	 	MONTHLY	 
	Base Rent	 	 	 	 	 	$	29.00	 	 	 	188,500.00	 	 	 	15,708.33	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Sales Tax	 	 	7.00	%	 	$	2.03	 	 	 	13,195.00	 	 	 	1,099.58	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TOTAL PAYMENT	 	 	 	 	 	$	31.03	 	 	 	201,695.00	 	 	 	16,807.92	 



 


		2.	Time is of the essence. (a) Tenant and Landlord agree that this 5. Amendment has to be signed by Tenant on or
before December 31, 2012 by 6:00pm EST.



 


(b) Tenant has to sign the next extension by January
31, 2013 in order to protect its Lease.


 


		3.	Further extension: Tenant has the option to further extend the term until December 31, 2013 (“Long Term
Extension”) with the same Base Rate as quoted above with the premises in “as-is” condition. This Long Term Extension
has to be signed by Tenant on or before January 31, 2013 by 6:00pm EST.



 




    	Page 1 of 2



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
caused this 4. Amendment to be duly executed by their respective authorized signatories as of the Effective Date.


 


Net Element, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Tenant”)


By: Net Element International, Inc.


 


	/s/ Jonathan New	 
	BY: Jonathan New, Chief Financial Officer	 
	 	 
	1450 South Miami LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Landlord”)
	 	 
	 	 
	By: Nickel Goeseke, Managing Member	 


 




    	Page 2 of 2
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           2017 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) Results      

# 2017 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) Results

These reports present information about the percentages of high school and middle school students who engage in certain risk behaviors, along with the status of school health policies and programs designed to address those behaviors.

https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/results.htm
## Other Youth Topics

## Breadcrumb

            -  Youth Topics 
            -  Opportunity Youth 
            -  Performance Partnership Pilots for Disconnected Youth (P3) 
            -           ED Blog Post (2014)      

# ED Blog Post (2014)

### ED Blog Post — Performance Partnership Pilots: An Opportunity to Improve Outcomes for Disconnected Youth

***This is cross-posted at the U.S. Department of Education's Homeroom blog. See the original post here. Johan Uvin is deputy assistant secretary in the Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education at the U.S. Department of Education, and Kathy Stack is advisor for evidence and innovation at the Office of Management and Budget.***

Over 5 million 14-to-24-year-olds in the U.S. are not working or in school and, in many cases, face the additional challenges of being homeless, in foster care, or involved in the justice system. Often disconnected from their families and valuable social networks, these young people struggle to make successful transitions to adulthood and to reach the educational and employment milestones critical to escaping a lifetime of poverty.

Government and community partners have invested considerable attention and resources to meet the needs of these “disconnected youth.” However, practitioners, youth advocates, and others on the front lines of service delivery point to significant obstacles to meaningful improvements in education, employment, health and well-being. These challenges include limited evidence and knowledge of what works, poor coordination and alignment across the systems that serve youth, policies that make it hard to target the neediest youth and overcome gaps in services, fragmented data systems that inhibit the flow of information to improve results, and administrative requirements that impede holistic approaches to serving this population. Many of these challenges can be addressed by improving coordination among programs and targeting resources on those approaches that get the best results for our most vulnerable youth.

### A New Approach

In response to the Obama Administration’s proposal, the recently passed Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2014 includes a new demonstration authority to establish up to 10 “Performance Partnership Pilots” (PDF, 2 pages) that will provide unprecedented flexibility to states, local communities, and tribes intended to remove some of the barriers to effectively serving disconnected youth, including youth who are low income and either homeless, in foster care, involved in the juvenile justice system, unemployed, or not enrolled in or at risk of dropping out of an educational institution.

Read more...

## Re-Connect Menu

-  Overview 
-  Evaluation 
-  Round 5 (FY 2021) 
-  Round 4 (FY 2018 and FY 2019) 
-  Round 3 (FY 2016) 
-  Round 2 (FY 2015) 
-  Round 1 (FY 2014) 
-  Background    -  Consultation Paper 
  -  Presentations 
  -  Shared Goal Statement (Draft) 
  -  Request for Information on Strategies (Draft) 
  -  ED Blog Post (2014)