alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1724.71 Borrower contractual obligations. ( a ) *Loan agreement.* As a condition of a loan or loan guarantee under the RE Act, distribution borrowers are normally required to enter into RUS loan agreements pursuant to which the borrower agrees to use RUS standard forms of contracts for construction, procurement, engineering services and architectural services financed in whole or in part by the RUS loan. Normally, this obligation is contained in section 5.16 of the standard distribution loan contract. To comply with the provisions of the loan agreements as implemented by this part, borrowers must use those forms of contract (hereinafter sometimes called “listed contract forms”) identified in the List of Required Standard Contract Forms contained in § 1724.74(c), except as provided in § 1724.70(b). Power Supply borrowers typically execute an indenture and loan contract as well. The terms and conditions of any indenture and loan contract executed by a Power Supply borrower shall govern its obligations with respect to the use of contract forms.
( b ) *Compliance.* If a borrower is required by this part or by its loan agreement with RUS to use a listed standard form of contract, the borrower shall use the listed contract form in the format available from RUS, either paper or electronic format, except as provided in § 1724.70(bc). Exact electronic reproduction is acceptable. The approved RUS standard forms of contract shall not be retyped, changed, modified, or altered in any manner not specifically authorized in this part or approved by RUS in writing on a case-by-case basis. Any modifications approved by RUS on a case-by-case basis must be clearly shown so as to indicate the modification difference from the standard form of contract.
( c ) *Amendment.* Where a borrower has entered into a contract in the form required by this part, no change may be made in the terms of the contract, by amendment, waiver or otherwise, without the prior written approval of RUS except as provided in § 1724.70(b).
( d ) *Waiver.* RUS may waive for good cause, on a case by case basis, the requirements imposed on a borrower pursuant to this part. Borrowers seeking a waiver by RUS must provide RUS with a written request explaining the need for the waiver.
( e ) *Violations.* A failure on the part of the borrower to use listed contracts as prescribed in this part is a violation of the terms of its loan agreement with RUS and RUS may exercise any and all remedies available under the terms of the agreement or otherwise.
[63 FR 58285, Oct. 30, 1998, as amended at 69 FR 7108, Feb. 13, 2004; 87 FR 73442, Nov. 30, 2022]
Exhibit  32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Peter  Dermutz,  certify,  PURSUANT  TO  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual
report  of  Rapidtron,  Inc. on form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act  of  1934  and that information contained in such annual report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results  of  operations  of  Rapidtron,  Inc.

Date: April 15, 2005                       By:  /s/ Peter Dermutz
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Peter Dermutz
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  typed  from  within  the  electronic  version of this written statement
required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided  to Rapidtron, Inc. and will be
retained  by  Rapidtron,  Inc.  and  furnished  to  the  Securities and Exchange
Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 9, 2012 

Order 

 

April 9, 2012 

143386(102) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 143386 

v COA: 290336 

Oakland CC: 2005-203484-FH 

JACOB TRAKHTENBERG, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

____________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for leave to file a 

brief 63 pages in length is considered and it is granted.
§ 1724.32 Inspection and certification of work order construction. The provisions of this section apply to all borrower electric system facilities regardless of the source of financing. ( a ) The borrower shall ensure that all field inspection and related services are performed within 6 months of the completion of construction, and are performed by a licensed engineer, except that a subordinate of the licensed engineer may make the inspection, provided the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The inspection by the subordinate is satisfactory to the borrower;
( 2 ) This practice is acceptable under applicable requirements of the States in which the facilities are located;
( 3 ) The subordinate is experienced in making such inspections;
( 4 ) The name of the person making the inspection is included in the certification; and
( 5 ) The licensed engineer signs such certification which appears on the inventory of work orders.
( b ) The inspection shall include a representative and sufficient amount of construction listed on each RUS Form 219, Inventory of Work Orders (or comparable form), being inspected to assure the engineer that the construction is acceptable. Each work order that was field inspected shall be indicated on RUS Form 219 (or comparable form.) The inspection services shall include, but not be limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Determination that construction conforms to RUS specifications and standards and to the requirements of the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), State codes, and local codes;
( 2 ) Determination that the staking sheets or as-built drawings represent the construction completed and inspected;
( 3 ) Preparation of a list of construction clean-up notes and staking sheet discrepancies to be furnished to the owner to permit correction of construction, staking sheets, other records, and work order inventories;
( 4 ) Reinspection of construction corrected as a result of the engineer's report;
( 5 ) Noting, initialing, and dating the staking or structure sheets or as-built drawings and noting the corresponding work order entry for line construction; and
( 6 ) Noting, initialing, and dating the as-built drawings or sketches for generating plants, substations, and other major facilities.
( c ) *Certification.* ( 1 ) The following certification must appear on all inventories of work orders: I hereby certify that sufficient inspection has been made of the construction reported by this inventory to give me reasonable assurance that the construction complies with applicable specifications and standards and meets appropriate code requirements as to strength and safety. This certification is in accordance with acceptable engineering practice.
( 2 ) A certification must also include the name of the inspector, name of the firm, signature of the licensed engineer, the engineer's State license number, and the date of signature.
Exhibit 31.1





RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION





I, Sam Shlomo Elimelech, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Andain, Inc.;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for the small business issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.         The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Dated: January 10, 2011
/s/ Sam Shlomo Elimelech

Sam Shlomo Elimelech, President
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Earl L. Chisolm

*Aaron P. Slitt,*in support of the motions.

*George D. Stoughton,*chief assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Submitted August 26

decided October *6,*1971

a) The “Motion For Determination That Piling Of Finding Of Fact Is Unnecessary” by the defendant from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.

b) The “Motion To Supreme Court For Oral Argument” by the defendant from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.

c) The motion to review the decision of the Superior Court in Hartford County revoking bail is reserved pending receipt of a finding.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Classroom Management: Approaches to Support School Connectedness      

# Classroom Management: Approaches to Support School Connectedness

This webpage offers strategies, tools, and templates that school staff can use to apply classroom management approaches to improve school connectedness in their face-to-face, virtual, or blended learning modes. Promising practices and specific classroom management approaches and skills to increase connectedness are provided. These approaches and skills include:  
                  -  Teacher caring and support  
                  -  Peer connection and support  
                  -  Student autonomy and empowerment  
                  -  Management of classroom social dynamics  
                  -  Teacher expectations  
                  -  Behavior management  
                  -  Instructional monitoring and support  
                  -  Content relevance  

**Learn more**.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA 

No. 07 / 06-1714 

Filed May 2, 2008 

STATE OF IOWA, 

 Appellee, 

vs. 

LACY JANE NELSON, 

 Appellant. 

 Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Worth County, Jon S. 

Scoles, Paul W. Riffel, and Bryan H. McKinley, Judges. 

 Defendant appeals conviction based upon the admission of 

evidence seized pursuant to a warrant issued by a magistrate who was 

not neutral and detached. REVERSED AND REMANDED. 

 Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Robert P. Ranschau, 

Assistant State Appellate Defender, for appellant. 

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Elisabeth S. Reynoldson, 

Assistant Attorney General, and Jeffrey H. Greve, County Attorney, for 

appellee. 
2

PER CURIAM. 

In this case, Lacy Nelson challenges her conviction for child 

endangerment on the ground that evidence admitted at trial was 

obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States 

Constitution and Article I, section 8 of the Iowa Constitution. The thrust 

of her claim is that the magistrate approving the search warrant was not 

“neutral and detached” and, as a result, evidence obtained pursuant to 

the search should have been suppressed at trial. 

Other than the identity of the defendant, the facts in this appeal 

are identical to those presented in a companion case decided today. 

State v. Fremont, 749 N.W.2d 234 (2008). The applicable legal principles 

are also the same. Based on the reasoning contained in Fremont, the 

ruling of the district court denying the motion to suppress is reversed 

and Nelson’s conviction is vacated. The case is remanded to the district 

court for further proceedings. 

REVERSED AND REMANDED. 

All justices concur except Streit, J., who takes no part. 

This opinion shall not be published.
July 27, 1979.

C. A. No. 78-112.

#### State *v.*Donald Porraro.

Mr. Chief Justice Bevilacqua and Mr. Justice Weisberger did not participate.

*Dennis J. Roberts II,*Attorney General, *Thomas H. Caruolo,*Special Assistant Attorney General, for plaintiff. *John F. Cicilline,*for defendant.

The defendant’s motion for reargument is denied.
§ 1753.25 General. ( a ) This subpart implements and explains the provisions of the Loan Documents setting forth the requirements and the procedures to be followed by borrowers in constructing headquarters, commercial office, central office, warehouse, and garage buildings with loan funds.
( b ) Terms used in this subpart are defined in § 1753.2.
( c ) All plans and specifications for buildings to be constructed with loan funds are subject to the approval of RUS. In addition, preliminary plans and specifications for headquarters and commercial office buildings to be constructed with loan funds are subject to RUS approval.
( d ) RUS Form 257, Contract to Construct Buildings, shall be used for the construction of all headquarters, commercial office, central office, warehouse, and garage buildings with loan funds. Refer to § 1753.26 for further instructions.
( e ) The borrower shall use the sealed competitive bid procedure for all building construction, except for: ( 1 ) Minor construction using subpart I procedures.
( 2 ) Major construction, where the borrower has received advanced approval to perform the construction by force account. Refer to §§ 1753.27 and 1753.29 for further instructions.
( f ) The site location, design, and construction of the facilities must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including: ( 1 ) Pub. L. 90-480 (42 U.S.C. 4151) (Access to Physically Handicapped), which requires certain buildings financed with Federal funds be designed and constructed to be accessible to the physically handicapped.
( 2 ) Pub. L. 91-596 (29 U.S.C. 651) the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. OSHA issues rules and regulations covering occupational safety and health standards for buildings. These regulations are codified in 29 CFR chapter XVII.
( 3 ) 7 CFR part 1970.
( 4 ) 7 CFR part 1792, subpart C, which requires that the building design comply with applicable seismic design criteria. Prior to the design of buildings, borrowers shall submit to RUS a written acknowledgement from the architect or engineer that the design will comply.
( g ) All construction pertaining to the building structure shall be performed under one contract. Separate contracts may be used for planting shrubbery, surfacing of roads and parking areas, and other identifiable parts of the project not pertaining to the building structure. These separate contracts shall also be subject to RUS approval as described in this subpart D.
( h ) The borrower is responsible for submitting evidence, satisfactory to RUS, establishing that clear title to the building site has been obtained. RUS will not approve the construction contract until it has given title clearance.
[54 FR 39267, Sept. 25, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39396, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 43717, Aug. 25, 1994; 64 FR 16606, Apr. 6, 1999; 81 FR 11028, Mar. 2, 2016]
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  February 25, 2009
    /s/ Barbara J. BritenrikerBarbara J. Britenriker, Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1726.400 Final contract amendment.

As needed, a final contract amendment will be prepared and processed in accordance with § 1726.24(b) prior to or in conjunction with the closeout of the contract.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, as Principal Executive Officer and as Principal Financial Officer of Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. (the Company), respectively, certify that, to the best of their knowledge and
belief, the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2010, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the information contained in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated therein. The foregoing certifications are made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.



/s/ Paul E. HarringtonPaul E. HarringtonPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)November 12, 2010/s/ Mark A. TrippMark A. TrippChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)November 12, 2010


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and will be retained by Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Frank M. Ryan, trustee under the last will and testament of Terrence E. Ryan, deceased et al., appellants, v. Mary A. Landon and John W. McQueen, trustee, appellees.

Gen. No. 8,301.

*654Opinion filed April 20, 1931.

Frank M. Ryan, for appellants.

Fred O. Churchill, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Boggs

delivered the opinion of the court.
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 14 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarter  ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper,
Jr.,  President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 14, 2006