alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

h1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145450

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145450

COA: 310105

Washtenaw CC: 91

- 025852

- FC

TODD WAYNE PLAMONDON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                        
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     Partnership's audited financial statements for the year ended September 30,
     1996 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
     statements.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                    433
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          434
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      43
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                              (410)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              443
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        8,455
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           6,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          588
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      4,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (3,678)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (3,678)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        23,459
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                           19,781
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          550.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                          550.40
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1214.87 Amendments.

Amendments to this subpart may be proposed from time to time by the Board or by any interested person affected by the provisions of the Act, including the Secretary.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Advanced Life Sciences Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscalquarter ending September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, John L. Flavin, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 to the extent applicable; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Date: November 10,  2009    |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ John L. Flavin               |
|   | John L. Flavin                        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer               |
|   | Advanced Life Sciences  Holdings, Inc |

 

1

----
#### § 15.74 Date of service.

The date of service shall be the day when the matter is deposited in the U.S. mail or is delivered in person, except that the date of service of the initial notice a hearing or notice of opportunity to request a hearing or notice setting a date for a hearing shall be the date of its delivery, or of its attempted delivery if delivery is refused.
Exhibit 32.01
 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  /s/ Steven M. Neil

Steven M. Neil
Chief Financial and Administrative OfficerDate: December 3, 2008
 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  /s/ Michael Mendes

Michael Mendes
President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: December 3, 2008
 These certifications accompany this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ida Schwartz, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that she refused suitable employment without good cause. The board found that claimant refused otherwise suitable employment on the sole grounds that she would be required to work until 9:00 p.m. two evenings a week, that such objection was “personal and non-compelling” and that therefore she refused suitable employment without good cause. The question of whether a claimant refused employment without good cause is factual and thus the board’s determination if supported by substantial evidence must be upheld (e.g., *Matter of Spack*[Corsi], 305 N. Y. 753; *Matter of Lipschitz*[Lubin], 7 A D 2d 777). We find presented by the record in the instant case only questions of fact as to whether claimant refused evening employment for noncompelling personal reasons or because of fear of personal safety which the board could properly resolve as it has *(Matter of Weiss [Catherwood],*26 A D 2d 851). Furthermore, claimant’s assertion here of health considerations cannot affect our conclusion, since this issue was not raised below. The medical certificate purportedly indicating health reasons was submitted for the first time on this appeal, while claimant in the record not only did not indicate any health problems but in fact stated, “ I am in good health and not under a doctor’s care.” Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur with Reynolds, J.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Lawrence R. Samuels, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of UTi Worldwide Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15 (f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.April 2, 2007/s/ Lawrence R. Samuels Lawrence R. Samuels
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.01

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         The undersigned, a Director of Ceridian Corporation (the "Company"), a
Delaware corporation, does hereby make, nominate and appoint JOHN R. EICKHOFF
and GARY M. NELSON, and each of them, to be my attorney-in-fact for three months
from the date hereof, with full power and authority to execute for and on behalf
of the undersigned the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2000, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; provided that such
Form 10-K is first reviewed by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Company and by my attorney-in-fact, and his name, when thus signed, shall
have the same force and effect as though I had manually signed such Form 10-K.

         I have signed this Power of Attorney as of January 31, 2001.


                                            /s/ Bruce R. Bond
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Bruce R. Bond

                                            /s/ William J. Cadogan
                                            -------------------------------
                                            William J. Cadogan

                                            /s/ Nicholas D. Chabraja
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Nicholas D. Chabraja

                                            /s/ Robert H. Ewald
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Robert H. Ewald

                                            /s/ Ronald T. LeMay
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Ronald T. LeMay

                                            /s/ George R. Lewis
                                            -------------------------------
                                            George R. Lewis

                                            /s/ Ronald L. Turner
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Ronald L. Turner

                                            /s/ Carole J. Uhrich
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Carole J. Uhrich

                                            /s/ Paul S. Walsh
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Paul S. Walsh
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1430.303 DPDP purchases. ( a ) DPDP purchases will be made only for those months that the FSA Administrator has determined meet all the requirements specified in § 1430.302. The purchases are subject to DPDP requirements including price and quantity restrictions specified in this subpart.
( b ) The Secretary has the authority to determine purchase and distribution methods for dairy product purchases and distribution. Unless otherwise determined by the Secretary, this authority is delegated to the Deputy Administrator in consultation with FNS.
( c ) FSA and FNS will determine the types and quantities of products that will be purchased, in consultation with public or private nonprofit organizations and State and local agencies eligible to receive such products.
( d ) The FSA Administrator will determine the quantity of purchases to be made for a qualifying month and will consider the results of any consultations in determining the quantity to be purchased. In making the determination, the FSA Administrator will also take into account a number of factors, including, but not limited to, dairy product market conditions, logistical considerations involved in the efficient and immediate distribution of the dairy products, the potential effect on markets and margins, time constraints of DPDP, and the cost effectiveness of the purchases. Approved quantities for a month will not exceed the amount of product that may be effectively distributed without waste.
( e ) Purchases may be approved for a qualifying month to the extent that the purchase by FSA can reasonably be expected to be completed in that calendar month and the products delivered to recipient agencies within 90 days.
( f ) DPDP purchases cannot be stored by or for CCC, and CCC cannot incur storage costs on behalf of recipient agencies for the dairy products.
( g ) The purchase price of products will be the prevailing market price for like dairy products for private buyers as determined by the Deputy Administrator. That price may be, if approved by the Deputy Administrator, the price determined by the normal procurement methods used to procure foods for FNS domestic food assistance programs, if the dairy products are obtained that way.
#### § 1209.19 Research.

*Research* means any type of study to advance the image, desirability, safety, marketability, production, product development, quality, or nutritional value of mushrooms.
Exhibit 32.1





HARLEYSVILLE GROUP INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Harleysville Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael L. Browne, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date:  March 7,  2008 |  | /s/ MICHAELL. BROWNE                 
|                      |  | Michael L. Browne                    
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
M. P. No. 79-337.

#### Rhode Island Bar Association *v.*Benedict Bader, Esquire and Allen E. Erickson, Esquire.

Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.

*Daniel J. Murray,*for petitioner.

This matter is before the Court on an order to Benedict Bader and Allen E. Erickson to show cause why they should not be suspended from the practice of law for failure to pay dues to the Rhode Island Bar Association. Benedict Bader and Allen E. Erickson failed to appear before the Court on December 3, 1979 as directed by the order to show cause.

If Benedict Bader and Allen E. Erickson have not paid dues in full within 30 days from the issuance of this order, they, having failed to show cause before this Court, shall not engage in the practice law in this State nor be employed by a person, firm or corporation engaged in the practice of law in this State until the dues have been paid in full and we have acted favorably on a petition for reinstatement.
Colorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 1 of 18 

# Technical Support Document

Regional Haze State Implementation Plan

Colorado 2002 Baseline Emission Inventory: Plan 2002d

Colorado 2018 Projection Emission Inventory: PRP2018bColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 2 of 18

The WRAP in partnership with the State of Colorado developed the 2002 basel ine and 2018

projection emission inventories that were used in the CMAC model to project visibility impacts at

the 12 Class I areas in Colorado. The following tables provide county level emissions data for

11 source categories (point, anthropogenic fire, natural fire, biogenic, area, WRAP O&G, on

road mobile, off

- road mobile, road dust, fugitive dust, and windblown dust. The emission

summaries include SO2, NOx, Primary Organic Aerosol (POA), Elemental Carbon (EC), Fine

PM (Soil), Coarse PM, Ammonia, and V olatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).Colorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 3 of 18



### Colorado SO2 Emissions for 2002

– Plan 02dColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 4 of 18



### Colorado NOx Emissions for 2 018

– P RP 18bColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 5 of 18



### Colorado NOx Emissions for 2002

– Plan 02dColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 6 of 1 8



### Colorado NOx Emissions for 2 018

– P RP 18bColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 7 of 18



### Colorado POA Emissions for 2002

– Plan 02dColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 8 of 18



### Colorado POA Emissions for 2 018

– P RP 18bColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 9 of 18



### Colorado EC Emissions for 2 018

– Plan 02dColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 10 of 18



### Colorado EC Emissions for 2 018

– P RP 18bColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 11 of 18



### Colorado Fine PM (Soil) Emissions for 2 018

– Plan 02dColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 12 of 18



### Colorado Fine PM (Soil) Emissions for 2 01 8

– P RP 18bColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 13 of 18



### Colorado Coarse PM Emissions for 2 018

– Plan 02dColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 14 of 18



### Colorado Coarse PM Emissions for 2 018

– P RP 18bColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 15 of 18



### Colorado Ammonia Emissions for 2 018

– Plan 02dColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 16 of 18



### Colorado Ammonia Emissions for 2 018

– P RP 18bColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 17 of 18



### Colorado VOC Emissions for 2 01 8

– Plan 02dColorado Emission Inventories Plan 2002d and PRP 2018b 18 of 18



### Colorado VOC Emissions for 2 018

– P RP 18b
2006-0589.

#### State v. Trouten.

Jefferson App. No. 04JE18, 2005-Ohio-6592. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due June 9, 2006 in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.