alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CourtsideAcquisition Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form10-QSB for the period ending September  30,  2006 (the‘‘Report’’), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Carl D. Harnick, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

|        |  |  |                                                                                                     |  |  |                        |
|--------|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|------------------------|
| By:    |  |  | /s/Carl D. Harnick                                                                                  |  |  | Dated: November 6,2006 |
|   |  |  | Carl D. HarnickVice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting and FinancialOfficer) |  |  |                   |
|        |

----
27–549 

109TH CONGRESS REPT. 109–464 " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session Part 2 

MILITARY QUALITY OF LIFE AND VETERANS AFFAIRS, 

AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2007 

MAY 16, 2006.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. WALSH, from the Committee on Appropriations, 

submitted the following 

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 

[To accompany H.R. 5385] 

The Committee on Appropriations submits the following supplemental report to correct a technical error in the printing of House 

Report 109–464. This supplemental report replaces the ‘‘Comparisons with Budget Resolution’’ section of House Report 109–464. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
(3) 

COMPARISONS WITH BUDGET RESOLUTION

Clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the House of Representatives requires an explanation of compliance with section 308(a)(1)(A) of the 

Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (Public Law 93–344), as amended, which requires that the report accompanying a bill providing new budget authority contain a statement detailing how that authority compares with the reports submitted under section 302 of the Act for the most recently agreed 

to concurrent resolution on the budget for the fiscal year from the 

Committee’s section of 302(a) allocation. 

[In millions of dollars] 

302(b) allocation This bill 

Budget authority Outlays Budget authority Outlays 

Discretionary .................................................................................................. 94,705 88,728 94,705 88,728 

Mandatory ....................................................................................................... 36,388 36,284 36,388 36,284 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
Y ()Fl\ LBU QU ER

\LFREDO R. S,\NTJSfEV\N, DIRECTOR

December 11, 2{)07

lJE

Martin J. Chavez, Mayor

'vir. Guy R. Donaldson, Chief, Air PlHnning Section

Mail Code 6·1'1 )·1.

I.:S .EP,\ RcglOll ()

H45 Ross \\'cnuc, Suite 1200

l)alJa$,·!cxas "5202-27:>5

Subjecr: Stare Implementation Plan (SIP) infrasuucture re<jwremulls under Section

110(,,)(1) and (2) of the Clean Air Act (C\A)

[kar :\1r. Donaldwll

This km:r is submitted to fulfill Bernalillo County's [c'luirements undrT SeCfJons

1 iO(a)(l) and (2) of rhe C\,\. The Cl""An ,\ir Act requires aU states tel submit plan;: to

provide for tilt, lmpkmcnrarion, maintenance and enforcement of the S·houT oz()ne

National Ambient Air Qwtlity Srandatd (N:\AQS). The t'. S. Erwironmenrnl Protection

Agency i" obJig~ted to make a determination on whether swre;; sati"fv lhe reqlliretJ)elH~

of Secrion 11 O(a)(I) and (2) for rhe Shour ozone N \:\QS by Decem!>er 15,2007.

The ..\lbuquct'lue Air Qu;dity Division, as agent for the Albuqucrque-Bern~lillo County

,\ir Quality Control Board and through the City of ;\lbl1<luerque's Deparmu:nr uf

Enviroorncnwl Health, hIlS evaluated the existing Ncw rvlcxico Srare, lr,nplcmentation

Pl:m fot ;\it Qua!ity (SIP), and finds that thci\lbuquerquc,BernahUo County ponioTl of

the SIP satisfies th<~ necess;!.r)' remaining 1W (a){l) and (2) f(xluire11lents for the Rbllut

NAAQ~ .

If you have further questions pectainmg to this matter. pleasc contact Isreal Tavarez,

Ellyironment,.l Engineering i\Ianagcr of the Air Quality Division at 50576B,1965.

Sinc~

I )

/k----

'/<'-'-""'\-'"

;¥ , cc 0 R"Santistevail--'-'

Direct(,r, Environmental Health Department
#### BURT, Respondent, v. HOCHSTIM, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by Hazel Burt against Max Hochstim.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted.
Nicor
      Gas
      Company


Form
      10-Q


Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nicor Gas Company (the “ Company ”)
      hereby
      certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
      period ended September 30, 2006 (the “ Report ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                November 1, 2006
            
            /s/
                RICHARD L. HAWLEYRichard
                L. HawleyExecutive
                Vice President and Chief Financial
                Officer
#### Chesler Operations, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v. Dominick & Dominick, Incorporated, Respondent, and Ramon Gasoliba, Jr., Intervenor-Appellant-Respondent.

Appeal and cross appeal from order entered December 29, 1966, are disposed of and the order unanimously modified on the law and the facts as herein indicated. The plaintiff and the defendant-intervenor both claim title and right to possession of the certificate representing 75,000 shares of stock now in custody of the Sheriff. Such certificate shall remain in the custody of the Sheriff pending trial providing the following conditions are met. The defendant-intervenor shall deliver to the Sheriff an undertaking in the amount of $1,500 to indemnify the Sheriff for all expenses (CPLR 7103, subd. [b]) and a further undertaking in the amount of $50,000 to indemnify the plaintiff for any losses it might suffer by reason of such impounding. The bond heretofore filed by plaintiff may be cancelled conditioned upon plaintiff’s filing with the Sheriff an undertaking in the amount of $50,000 to indemnify defendantintervenor against any loss should defendant-intervenor be adjudged owner of the certificate. Plaintiff may obtain possession of the certificate upon filing an undertaking in the total amount of $400,000. The undertakings shall be acceptable to the Sheriff and copies thereof shall be served upon opposing counsel and filed with the Clerk of the court. The provision for consents and for an immediate trial are stricken from the order. The parties, however, should not unreasonably delay a trial of the issues. As so modified the order appealed from is otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to any party. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ.
Nicor
        Inc.
 Form
        10-K
 Exhibit
        23.01
 
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
        33-1732, 33-31029, 333-107377, 333-107375 and 333-28699 on Form S-8 of our
        report, dated February 23, 2007, relating to the financial statements and
        financial statement schedule of Nicor Inc. (which expresses an unqualified
        opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to changes, in 2006,
        in
        method of accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement
        plans,
        and method of accounting for share based payments as discussed in Note 2
        and a
        change, in 2005, in method of accounting for conditional asset retirement
        obligations as discussed in Note 5), and management’s report on the
        effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in
        this
        Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. for the year ended December 31,
        2006.
 
 /s/
        DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
 Chicago,
        Illinois
 February
        23, 2007
#### §§ 1710.7-1710.49 [Reserved]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNonlinear dynamics and numerical uncertainties in CFDThe application of nonlinear dynamics to improve the understanding of numerical uncertainties in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is reviewed. Elementary examples in the use of dynamics to explain the nonlinear phenomena and spurious behavior that occur in numerics are given. The role of dynamics in the understanding of long time behavior of numerical integrations and the nonlinear stability, convergence, and reliability of using time-marching, approaches for obtaining steady-state numerical solutions in CFD is explained. The study is complemented with spurious behavior observed in CFD computations.Document ID19960049992Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsYee, H. C.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field,CA United States)*Sweby, P. K.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field,CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1996Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-110398NAS 1.15:110398A-96173Accession Number96N34118Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-59-53Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960049992.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit (32.1)

HARLEYSVILLE GROUP INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Harleysville Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael L. Browne, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 4, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ MICHAEL L. BROWNE                
|                    |  |  |  | Michael L. Browne                    
|                    |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT  13(E)

MARKET  FOR  COMMON  STOCK  AND  RELATED  SECURITY  HOLDER  MATTERS

     The  stock  of  Harleysville  Group  Inc.  is quoted on the Nasdaq National
Market  System, and assigned the symbol HGIC.  At the close of business on March
5,  2003,  the  approximate  number  of  holders of record of Harleysville Group
Inc.'s  common  stock  was  2,404  (counting  all  shares held in single nominee
registration  as  one  shareholder).

     The payment of dividends is subject to the discretion of Harleysville Group
Inc.'s  Board  of  Directors  which each quarter considers, among other factors,
Harleysville  Group's  operating  results,  overall financial condition, capital
requirements and general business conditions.  The present quarterly dividend of
$0.165  per  share  paid  in  each  of  the third and fourth quarters of 2002 is
expected  to  continue  during  2002.  As a holding company, one of Harleysville
Group  Inc.'s  sources of cash with which to pay dividends is dividends from its
subsidiaries.  Harleysville  Group  Inc.'s  insurance  company  subsidiaries are
subject to state laws that restrict their ability to pay dividends.  See Note 10
of  the  Notes  to  Consolidated  Financial  Statements.

     The  following  table  sets forth the amount of cash dividends declared per
share,  and  the  high  and  low  bid  quotations  as  reported  by  Nasdaq  for
Harleysville  Group  Inc.'s  common  stock  for each quarter during the past two
years.

                                                CASH
                                                DIVIDENDS
     2002                 HIGH       LOW        DECLARED
     -----------------------------------------------------
     First  Quarter       $27.26     $22.60     $.15
     Second  Quarter       32.37      24.46      .15
     Third  Quarter        27.87      19.57      .165
     Fourth  Quarter       29.05      23.32      .165

                                                 CASH
                                                 DIVIDENDS
      2002                HIGH         LOW       DECLARED
     -----------------------------------------------------
     First  Quarter       $30.06      $20.44     $.14
     Second  Quarter       30.01       21.44      .14
     Third  Quarter        30.15       19.10      .15
     Fourth  Quarter       26.72       23.14      .15

Page  65

<PAGE>
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T23:10:35-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### § 1720.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes policies and procedures implementing a guarantee program for bonds and notes issued for utility infrastructure purposes authorized by section 313A of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 (7 U.S.C. 940c-1).

[87 FR 74499, Dec. 6, 2022]
#### § 1739.21 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements in this part are approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and assigned OMB control number 0572-0127.
** **

**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I,Wayne W. Roumagoux, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of M. L. MacadamiaOrchards, L.P.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.

 

Date:   March 20, 2008

 
| /s/  Wayne W. Roumagoux  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |
| Wayne  W. Roumagoux      |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

----
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: December 1, 2014 

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR–2013-0602 

FROM: Melanie King, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

SUBJECT: November 18, 2014 Meeting and Tribal Consultation with Fort Mojave Indian Tribe 

Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants 

SUMMARY 

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendee(s) listed below on November 18, 2014, to 

discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan Supplemental Proposal for Existing Power Plants in Indian 

Country and U.S. Territories. The Clean Power Plan Supplemental Proposal was issued on October 28, 

2014, and published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2014. 

ATTENDEES 

Fort Mojave Indian Tribe 

 Luke Johnson 

Calpine 

 Barbara McBride 

 Mitchell Weinberg 

EPA 

 William Niebling, OAR 

 Greg Green, OAR/OAQPS 

 Laura McKelvey, OAR/OAQPS 

 Melanie King, OAR/OAQPS 

 Mary Johnson, OAR/OAQPS (by phone) 

 Amy Zimpfer, Region 9 

 Anita Lee, Region 9 

 Colleen McKaughan, Region 9 

 Laura Farris, Region 8
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-20-00127-CV

_________________

JIMMY LEE MENIFEE, Appellant

V.

CAROL CHANDLER, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CC-20-00582-C

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Appellant, Jimmy Lee Menifee, filed a motion to stay the execution of a writ 

of possession in an eviction case.1 Appellant has not shown that he superseded the 

1 Menifee’s appeal was transferred to this Court under a docket equalization 

order.
2

judgment, as required by statute.2 Furthermore, Appellant neither properly 

authenticated his supporting documentation nor certified that that he has complied 

with his obligation to inform the appellee that he is seeking relief from this Court.3

It appears, however, that a writ of possession might be executed in violation of the 

Texas Supreme Court’s Ninth Emergency Order Regarding the COVID-19 State of 

Disaster, which prohibits the posting of the written warning required by section 

24.0061 of the Property Code and the execution of the writ of possession until after 

May 7, 2020.4

When an appeal is perfected, we may make such orders as are necessary to 

preserve the parties’ rights until disposition of the appeal.5 The Court finds 

temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue prejudice. It is ORDERED that the 

execution on writ of possession in Cause No. CC-20-00582-C is STAYED until May 

7, 2020 or until further order of this Court. No bond is required of the appellant as a 

condition to any relief herein granted.

2 See generally Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 24.007 (“A judgment of a county court 

may not under any circumstances be stayed pending appeal unless, within 10 days 

of the signing of the judgment, the appellant files a supersedeas bond in an amount 

set by the county court.”).

3 See generally Tex. R. App. P. 9.5; 10. 4 See Ninth Emergency Order Regarding the Covid-19 Disaster, No. 20-9052

(Tex. Apr. 6, 2020). 5 See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 24.4(c).
3

We ORDER the appellant to amend his motion to comply with the conference, 

verification, and authentication provisions of Rule 10 and the service requirements 

of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5. The supporting evidence must include the 

trial court’s order, the writ of possession, and any trial court motions or orders 

regarding superseding the judgment. The amended motion is due Wednesday, April 

29, 2020. The appellee may file a response to the amended motion on or before 

Monday May 4, 2020. 

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.

ORDER ENTERED April 24, 2020.

PER CURIAM

 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Horton, JJ.