6708 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives 

[OMB Number 1140–0065] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Requisition 

for forms or publications and requisition 

for firearms/explosives forms. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives (ATF), will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. Comments 

are encouraged and will be accepted for 

‘‘sixty days’’ until April 12, 2010. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Diane Woods, Material 

Management Branch, Room 3S–247, 99 

New York Avenue, NE., Washington, DC 

20226. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of this information 

collection: 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Requisition for Forms or Publications 

and Requisition for Firearms/Explosives 

Forms. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form Number: ATF F 1370.3 

and ATF F 1370.2. Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: Business or other 

for-profit. Other: Individual or 

households. The forms are used by the 

general public to request or order forms 

or publications from the ATF 

Distribution Center. The forms also 

notify ATF of the quantity required by 

the respondent and provide a guide as 

to annual usage of ATF forms and 

publications by the general public. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that 30,000 

respondents will complete each 3 

minute form. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: There are an estimated 1,725 

annual total burden hours associated 

with this collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Bryant, Department 

Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning 

Staff, Justice Management Division, 

Department of Justice, Patrick Henry 

Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: February 4, 2010. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2882 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives 

[OMB Number 1140–0088] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Advanced 

Explosives Destruction Techniques 

(AEDT) Training Course Follow-up 

Evaluation. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives (ATF), will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. Comments 

are encouraged and will be accepted for 

‘‘sixty days’’ until April 12, 2010. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact, James Scott, Learning 

Systems Management Division, 99 New 

York Ave., NE.,Washington, DC 20226. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Advanced Explosives Destruction 

Techniques (AEDT) Training Course 

Follow-up Evaluation Form. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form Number: None. Bureau 

of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and 

Explosives. 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices 6709 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract. Primary: State, Local, or Tribal 

Government. Other: None. The 

information collected on the survey will 

provide ATF with data on how the 

training participants have transferred 

the knowledge and skills learned to 

their jobs. The Kirkpatrick 4–Level 

Model is used to evaluate ATF training 

programs. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that 354 

respondents will complete a 12 minute 

survey. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: There are an estimated 71 

annual total burden hours associated 

with this collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Bryant, Department 

Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning 

Staff, Justice Management Division, 

Department of Justice, Patrick Henry 

Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: February 4, 2010. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2880 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

United States, et al. v. Ticketmaster 

Entertainment Inc. and Live Nation 

Inc.; Proposed Final Judgment and 

Competitive Impact Statement 

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 

15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), that a proposed 

Final Judgment, Stipulation and 

Competitive Impact Statement have 

been filed with the United States 

District Court for the District of 

Columbia in United States of America, 

et al. v. Ticketmaster Entertainment, 

Inc. and Live Nation, Inc., Civil Action 

No. 1:10-cv-00139. On January 25, 2010, 

the United States, along with 17 state 

attorneys general, filed a Complaint 

alleging that the proposed merger of 

Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc. and 

Live Nation, Inc. would substantially 

lessen competition in primary ticketing 

in the United States and violate Section 

7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18. The 

proposed Final Judgment, filed the same 

time as the Complaint, requires the 

merged firm to license a copy of the 

Ticketmaster host platform software to 

Anschutz Entertainment Group, Inc., to 

divest Paciolan, Inc. to ComcastSpectacor, L.P. or another acceptable 

buyer, and to abide by certain 

behavioral restrictions. 

Copies of the Complaint, proposed 

Final Judgment and Competitive Impact 

Statement are available for inspection at 

the Department of Justice, Antitrust 

Division, Antitrust Documents Group, 

450 Fifth Street, NW., Suite 1010, 

Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202– 

514–2481), on the Department of 

Justice’s Web site at http:// 

www.justice.gov/atr, and at the Office of 

the Clerk of the United States District 

Court for the District of Columbia. 

Copies of these materials may be 

obtained from the Antitrust Division 

upon request and payment of the 

copying fee set by Department of Justice 

regulations. 

Public comment is invited within 60 

days of the date of this notice. Such 

comments, and responses thereto, will 

be published in the Federal Register 

and filed with the Court. Comments 

should be directed to John Read, Chief, 

Litigation III, Antitrust Division, 

Department of Justice, 450 Fifth Street, 

NW., Suite 4000, Washington, DC 

20530, (telephone: 202–514–7308). 

J. Robert Kramer II, 

Director of Operations. 

United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia 

United States of America, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Antitrust Division, 450 Fifth Street, 

NW., Suite 4000, Washington, DC 20530; 

State of Arizona, Office of the Attorney 

General, 1275 West Washington, Phoenix, 

AZ 85007; 

State of Arkansas, Office of the Attorney 

General, 323 Center Street, Suite 200, Little 

Rock, AR 72201; 

State of California, California Office of the 

Attorney General, 300 So. Spring Street, 

Suite 1702, Los Angeles, CA 90013; 

State of Florida, Office of the Attorney 

General, Antitrust Division, PL–01; The 

Capitol, Tallahassee, FL 32399–1050; 

State of Illinois, Office of the Attorney 

General, 100 West Randolph Street, 

Chicago, IL 60601; 

State of Iowa, Iowa Department of Justice, 

Hoover Office Building-Second Floor, 1305 

East Walnut Street, Des Moines, IA 50319; 

State of Louisiana, Public Protection 

Division, 1885 North Third St., Baton 

Rouge, LA 70802; 

Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Office of 

Attorney General Martha Coakley, One 

Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108; 

State of Nebraska, Nebraska Department of 

Justice, 2115 State Capitol, Lincoln, NE 

68509; 

State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney 

General, Bureau of Consumer Protection, 

555 E. Washington Ave., Suite 3900, Las 

Vegas, NV 89101; 

State of Ohio, Office of Ohio Attorney 

General Richard Cordray, 150 E. Gay St., 

23rd Fl., Columbus, OH 43215; 

State of Oregon, Oregon Department of 

Justice, 1162 Court Street NE., Salem, OR 

97301–4096; 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of 

Attorney General, Antitrust Section, 14th 

Floor Strawberry Square, Harrisburg, PA 

17120; 

State of Rhode Island, Office of the Attorney 

General, 150 South Main Street, 

Providence, RI 02903; 

State of Tennessee, Office of the Attorney 

General and Reporter, 425 Fifth Avenue 

North, Nashville, TN 37243; 

State of Texas, Office of the Attorney 

General, 300 W. 15th Street, Austin, TX 

78701; and 

State of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Department of 

Justice, 17 West Main Street, Madison, WI 

53707, Plaintiffs, v. 

Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc., 8800 West 

Sunset Boulevard, West Hollywood, CA 

90069, and Live Nation, Inc., 9348 Civic 

Center Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90210, 

Defendants. 

Case: 1:10-cv-00139. 

Date Filed: January 25, 2010. 

Complaint 

The United States of America, acting 

under the direction of the Attorney 

General of the United States, and the 

States of Arizona, Arkansas, California, 

Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, 

Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode 

Island, Tennessee, Texas, and 

Wisconsin, and the Commonwealths of 

Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, acting 

under the direction of their respective 

Attorneys General or other authorized 

officials (‘‘Plaintiff States’’) (collectively, 

‘‘Plaintiffs’’), bring this civil action 

pursuant to the antitrust laws of the 

United States to enjoin the proposed 

merger of Ticketmaster Entertainment, 

Inc. (‘‘Ticketmaster’’) and Live Nation, 

Inc. (‘‘Live Nation’’) and to obtain such 

other equitable relief as the Court deems 

appropriate. The United States and the 

Plaintiff States allege as follows: 

I. Introduction 

1. This lawsuit challenges a proposed 

merger between Ticketmaster and Live 

Nation. If not enjoined, the merger will 

eliminate competition between the 

companies in the line of commerce of 

the provision of primary ticketing 

services (‘‘primary ticketing’’) to major 

concert venues in the United States, in 

violation of Section 7 of the Clayton 

Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18. 

2. For over two decades, Ticketmaster 

has been the dominant primary ticketing 

service provider in the United States to, 

among others, major concert venues. 

Primary ticketing, the initial 

distribution of tickets, has been highly 

profitable for Ticketmaster. 

Ticketmaster charges a variety of service 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES