alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Kent Snyder, Chief Executive Officer of Senomyx, Inc. (the “Company”), and Antony Rogers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

1.       The Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

 

2.       The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 3rd day of March, 2011.

 

 
| /S/   KENT SNYDER                    |       | /S/   ANTONY ROGERS                        |
|--------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|
| **KENT   SNYDER**                    | ** ** | **ANTONY   ROGERS**                        |
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |       | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| of the Board of Directors            |       |                                       |

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Senomyx, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
§ 1230.627 Registration form and ballot. ( a ) *Producers.* ( 1 ) A ballot (Form LS-72) and combined registration and certification form (Form LS-72-2) will be used for voting in-person. The information required on the registration form includes name, address, and telephone number. Form LS-72-2 also contains the certification statement referenced in § 1230.628. The ballot will require producers to check a “yes” or “no.”
( 2 ) A combined registration and voting form (Form LS-73) will be used for absentee voting. The information required on this combined registration and voting form includes name, address, and telephone number. Form LS-73 also contains the certification statement referenced in § 1230.628. The ballot will require producers to check “yes” or “no.”
( b ) *Importers.* A combined registration and ballot form (Form LS-76) will be used for importer voting. The information required on this combined registration and ballot form includes name, address, and telephone number. Form LS-76 also contains the certification statement referenced in § 1230.629. The ballot will require importers to check “yes” or “no.”
#### Janet Callaghan, Appellant, v Susan Goldsweig, Esq., et al., Respondents.

[777 NYS2d 60]

*362Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered January 31, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, dismissed the claim of fraudulent representation against defendant Goldsweig, dismissed claims of legal malpractice and violation of Judiciary Law § 487 against defendant Grae, required repleading of the claim for breach of fiduciary duty against Grae and the section 487 and fiduciary duty claims against defendant Berke, and dismissed the claim of fraudulent conveyance against Berke, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants are alleged to have assisted or participated in the representation of plaintiff in her divorce action. With regard to the repleading directive, the poorly drafted complaint and attached exhibits contained many irrelevancies, to the point of being excessively burdensome, and some factual allegations even appeared under the wrong cause of action.

Accepting as true the facts as alleged in the complaint *(219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander’s, Inc.,*46 NY2d 506 [1979]), as well as all reasonable inferences to be gleaned therefrom *(see McGill v Parker,*179 AD2d 98, 105 [1992]), the claim for fraudulent representation against Goldsweig still failed to state a cause of action. It does not appear that Goldsweig was trying to conceal her inability to serve as plaintiffs attorney of record: there was no sign on her office door holding her out as an attorney, and she told plaintiff that she “couldn’t do the divorce” and would arrange for another attorney to handle it. Goldsweig’s failure to spell out that she was no longer a member of the bar does not, under these circumstances, amount to misrepresentation of a material existing fact, an essential element in a cause of action for fraud *(see New York Univ. v Continental Ins. Co.,*87 NY2d 308, 318 [1995]).

Grae’s failure to acknowledge uncertainty over the facts surrounding plaintiffs daughter’s injury, prior to his preparation and submission of plaintiffs affidavit alleging that her husband had abused the child, did not state a viable cause of action for legal malpractice. This would constitute an expectation beyond “the reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession” *(see Arnav Indus., Inc. Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner,*96 NY2d 300, 303-304 [2001]). Plaintiff never alleged that Grae knew the statements in the affidavit were false when he submitted it, and thus did not spell out a violation of section 487. Indeed, plaintiff took the converse position when she alleged that Berke later “falsely retract[ed] every allegation she had correctly made against her husband.”

There is no indication that plaintiffs due process rights were *363substantially prejudiced, inasmuch as she does not challenge the court’s reasoning in dismissing the fraudulent conveyance claim sua sponte *(see Greene v Davidson,*210 AD2d 108, 109 [1994], *lv denied*85 NY2d 806 [1995]). We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
M. P. No. 79-457.

#### State *v.*Kevin Murphy *et al.*

Mr. Justice Doris did not partcipate.

*Dennis J. Roberts II,*Attorney General, *Stephen Lichatin III,*Special Assistant Attorney General, Chief, Appellate Division, for petitioner, *John D. Lynch,*for respondents.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied as moot.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1469.24 Contract modifications and transfers of land. ( a ) Contracts may be modified: ( 1 ) At the request of the participant, if the modification is consistent with the purposes of the conservation security program, or;
( 2 ) As required by the State Conservationist due to changes to the type, size, management, or other aspect of the agricultural operation that would interfere with achieving the purposes of the program.
( b ) Participants may request a modification to their contract to change their tier of participation under a conservation stewardship contract once the measures determined necessary by NRCS to meet the next tier level have been established.
( c ) Contract transfers are permitted when there is agreement among all parties to the contract and the contract area remains intact. ( 1 ) NRCS must be notified within 60 days of the transfer of interest and the transferee's acceptance of the contract terms and conditions, or the contract will be terminated.
( 2 ) The transferee must be determined by NRCS to be eligible and must assume full responsibility under the contract, including operation and maintenance of those conservation practices and activities already undertaken and to be undertaken as a condition of the contract.
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: (1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-117036) of Encore Acquisition Company,  (2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-83766) pertaining to the 2000 IncentiveStock Plan of Encore Acquisition Company, and  (3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-120422) pertaining to the 2000 IncentiveStock Plan of Encore Acquisition Company,of ourreports dated February 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofEncore Acquisition Company and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofEncore Acquisition Company, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December31, 2007./s/ Ernst & Young LLPFort Worth, Texas
#### § 1700.34 Assistance to High Energy Cost Rural Communities.

RUS, through the Electric Program, makes grants and loans to assist high energy cost rural communities. The Assistant Administrator, Electric Program, directs and coordinates the assistance to high energy cost rural communities program and serves as the primary point of contact for applicants, grantees, and borrowers.

[70 FR 5351, Feb. 2, 2005. Redesignated at 71 FR 8436, Feb. 17, 2006]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1032 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1032

 To amend title 1, United States Code, to provide for a definition of 
 the term ``State'' and to include territories therein, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2023

 Ms. Plaskett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 1, United States Code, to provide for a definition of 
 the term ``State'' and to include territories therein, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THE TERM ``STATE'' TO INCLUDE TERRITORIES FOR PURPOSES OF 
              FEDERAL LAW.

    (a) The Term ``State'' To Include Territories.--Chapter 1 of title 
1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 9. Rule of construction regarding the term `State'
    ``In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any 
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative 
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the term `State' shall 
include any territory of the United States, unless the statute, rule, 
regulation, or interpretation explicitly excludes the territories from 
the definition of the term or otherwise precludes their inclusion.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such chapter is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``9. Rule of construction regarding the term `State'.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 160.46 Identification of containers.

Containers packed with naval stores which have been inspected, classified, graded, and certified by a licensed inspector at an eligible processing plant shall be marked to show the name and location or other acceptable identification of the plant, and the legend “U.S. Graded” or “U.S. Inspected”, and, in the case of rosin, the batch number indicating the date of production.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1719]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

Whereas, the Greater Detroit Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 70, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand FTZ 70 to include two sites in the Detroit, Michigan, area, adjacent to the Detroit Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 14-2010, filed 2/24/2010);

                    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (75 FR 11514, 3/11/2010 and 75 FR 15679, 3/30/2010) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;

Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:

The application to expand FTZ 70 is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of October 2010.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-28165 Filed 11-5-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### TIVNAN v. KEAHON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by Patrick Tivnan against Virginia Keahon, as administratrix.

No opinion. Motion denied on payment of $10 costs. Order filed.
§ 1484.20 Application process. ( a ) *General application requirements.* CCC will periodically announce through a NOFO that it is accepting applications for participation in the Cooperator program for a specified program year. This announcement will be posted on the U.S. Government website for grant opportunities. Applications shall be submitted in accordance with the terms and requirements specified in the announcement and in this part. Currently, applicants are encouraged to submit applications through the UES system but are not required to do so.
( b ) *Universal identifier and System for Award Management (SAM).* In accordance with 2 CFR part 25, each entity that applies to the Cooperator program and does not qualify for an exemption under 2 CFR 25.110 must: ( 1 ) Be registered in the SAM prior to submitting an application or plan;
( 2 ) Maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which it has an active Federal award or an application or plan under consideration by CCC; and
( 3 ) Provide its DUNS number, or a unique identifier designated as a DUNS replacement, in each application or plan it submits to CCC.
( c ) *Reporting subaward and executive compensation information.* In accordance with 2 CFR part 170, each entity that applies to the Cooperator program and does not qualify for an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b) must ensure it has the necessary processes and systems in place to comply with the applicable reporting requirements of 2 CFR part 170 should it receive Cooperator program funding.
**Exhibit 11.1**

 

**ML Macadamia Orchards, L.P.**

**Computation of Net Income (Loss) per Class A Unit**

(in thousands, except per unit data)

 
| ** **                                              | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------|------------|----------|------------|----------|------------|
|                                                    |       |     |       |     |       |     |       |
| Net income (loss)                                       |       | $        | (1,649     | )        | $          | 69       |       | $ | (480 | ) |
|                                                    |       |     |       |     |       |     |       |
| Class A Unitholders (ownership percentage)         |       | x        |  99   | %        | x          |  99 | %          | X |  99 | % |
|                                                    |       |     |       |     |       |     |       |
| Net income (loss) allocable to Class A Unitholders |       | $        | (1,632     | )        | $          | 68       |       | $ | (475 | ) |
|                                                    |       |     |       |     |       |     |       |
| Class A Units outstanding                          |       | 7,500    |       | 7,500    |       | 7,500    |       |
|                                                    |       |     |       |     |       |     |       |
| Net income (loss) per Class A Unit                 |       | $        | (0.22      | )        | $          | 0.01     |       | $ | (0.06 | ) |

 

1

----
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09370

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 09370\09370_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09370\09370_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

09370\09370_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09370\09370_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09370\09370_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09370\09370_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09370\09370_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09370\09370_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09370\09370_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09370\Certification Statement Plant ID 09370.pdf Plant certification statement

09370\Supplemental Documents\09370_cover letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 09370\Supplemental Documents\09370_MAP-1 Newington_Facility_Diagram (34x22).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 09370\Supplemental Documents\09370_NEWINGTON FLY ASH BLOCK DIAGRAM (11x17).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 09370\Supplemental Documents\09370_WB-1 NEWINGTON WATER BALANCE BLOCK DIAGRAM (11x17).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
li3_ex102.htm

EXHIBIT 10.2

 

 



 

Santiago, Chile, 

May 31st, 2017

 

Mr Luis Santillana

Las Codornices 24, colina, RM, Chile

 

Re: Termination of compensation as it relates to the Employment Services Agreement dated December 1st, 2011 and amended on April 10th, 2012, April 8th, 2015 and March 4th, 2016 (the “Agreement”).

 

Dear Luis, 

 

We write to confirm the understanding relating to the temporary six month suspension of remuneration due to Luis Santillana (the Employee”) from Li3 Energy, Inc., a Nevada company (the “Company”) for services provided by the Employee. 

 

By countersigning their agreement to this letter, the Employee agrees that from the period of May 31st, 2017 until November 30th, 2017, the Employee shall not be due and shall not receive any compensation from the Company for services provided. This will include, but not be limited to, a complete suspension of Sections 3 and 4 of the Agreement. The Employee however will abide by all other sections of the Agreement and provide the specified services to the Company until the Agreement is terminated or otherwise replaced. 

 

We appreciate your dedication to Li3 and our vision for the future of the Company and value your contribution to our endeavour.

 

Please countersign and return this letter to us by 5:00 p.m. Santiago, Chile time on June 2, 2017 to confirm your agreement and understanding of this temporary amendment to the Agreement between you and the Company.

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Patrick Cussen                                

Patrick Cussen, Chairman

 

Countersigned

 

/s/ Luis Santillana                                 

Luis Santillana
## DEC 12 2013

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Removal ofS High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Orphan Chemicals from thePriority TestingList

### in the TSCA Interagency Testing Committee's 73rd 

### Report FROM: 

# l.Maria J. Doa, Director 

# w./'-y 'V 1 Chemical Control Division 

### 0 Office ofPollution Prevention and Toxics 

### TO: John D. Walker, Ph.D., M.P.H., Director TSCA Interagency Testing Committee Chemical Information and Testing Branch Chemical Control Division Office ofPollution Prevention and Toxics 

### RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REMOVAL The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requests that the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Interagency Testing Committee (lTC) remove 5 additional High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program orphan chemicals from the TSCA section 4(e) Priority Testing List in the ITC's 73rd Report. EPA established the HPV Challenge program in December 1998 to collect basic hazard data on HPV Chemicals from producers on a voluntary basis
. HPV chemicals are chemicals produced in quantities greater than or equal to one million pounds per year. Orphans are chemicals for which no chemical producers have volunteered to provide basic hazard data. In 2004, at the EPA's request, the lTC added 281 HPV Challenge Program orphan chemicals to the Priority Testing List in the ITC's 55th and 56th Reports (http://www.epa.gov/oppt/itc/pubs/rptmain.htm). As ofJune 2013,231 HPV Challenge Program orphan chemicals had been removed from the Priority Testing List because they were included in EPA's test rules, the testing was voluntarily sponsored or because they no longer met the::::_ 1million pound criterion for the HPV Challenge Program. At this time, I am requesting the lTC to remove 5 additional HPV Challenge Program orphan chemicals from the Priority Testing List based on the rationales in the ITC's 73rd Report. A list ofthe 5 HPV Challenge Program orphan chemicals that I am requesting be removed from the Priority Testing List is attached as Table 1. Ifyou have any questions concerning this memorandum, please contact the EPA lTC Member, Mike Mattheisen at 202-564-3077.Attachments Table 1
. HPV Challenge Program orphan chemicals being removed from the Priority Testing List CAS No. Chemical Name Rationale

94-96-2 1,3-Hexanediol, 2-ethyl- A 111-85-3 Octane, 1-chloro- B 3386-33-2 Octadecane, 1-chloro- B 52184-19-7 Phenol, 2,4-bis(1, 1-dimethylpropyl)-6-[2-(2-nitrophenyl)diazenyl]- B 68515-89-9 Barium, carbonate nonylphenol complexes B A - Scheduled for voluntary testing- http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk /pubs/summaries/2ethlhex/c15756tp
.pdf
. 8 -Did notmeetthe ::=:_ I million lb production or importation volume criterion for the HPV Challenge Program in the 2006 Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and the 2012 Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule
.