alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 10, 2011
    By:
    /s/   Edward J. WhalenEdward J. WhalenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

  Kansas

> - Topeka
- Whicita/Sedgwick

----
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________

Project No.: 0317.02.029.033 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: Steam Electric ELG CBI?

Yes

x No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

x Outgoing

Date: 9/24/2015 Time: 1:00 am

x pm

Company Name: United Conveyor Corporation (UCC) ERG Staff Name: Elizabeth Gentile

Contact Name: UCC Contact Phone Number: Conference Call

General Subject: Bottom Ash Complete Recycle – Cost Estimates

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On Thursday, September 24, 2015, I participated in a call with Ron Jordan, EPA, and UCC to discuss bottom 

ash complete recycle systems, specifically remote mechanical drag systems (MDS). UCC explained that 

typically a surge tank, return water pumps, and piping would be required to recycle bottom ash transport water 

from the remote MDS back to the boiler to eliminate the discharge of bottom ash transport water. UCC 

provided the following capital cost estimates for the equipment:

- Surge tank: $250,000 - $500,000

- Set of return water pumps: $2,000,000

- Carbon steel return piping (and miscellaneous hardware): $50,000

UCC explained that typically the plant would install one surge tank, one set of return water pumps, and carbon 

steel return piping (listed above) for each set of two remote MDS trains installed at the plant. Therefore, for 

every two remote MDS installations, the capital cost incurred for the equipment listed above would be 

approximately $2,500,000, with an installation cost of $5,000,000 (total $7,500,000).

Further, UCC explained that there are two key components in determining the number of remote MDS 

installations required at a plant: sluice flow rate (in gallons per minute) and the number of generating units at 

the plant. UCC provided the following rule of thumb for estimating the number of recommended remote MDS 

installations for a plant based on the number of generating units:

- 1 generating unit: 1 or 2 remote MDS installations

- 2 generating units: 2 remote MDS installations

- 3 generating units: 2 remote MDS installations

- 4 generating units: 3 remote MDS installations

- 5 generating units: 4 remote MDS installations

UCC noted that the number of generating units at the plant may not dictate the total number of remote MDS 

installations if the plant has a different number of sluice lines than generating units. For example, some plants 

operate one or two sluicing lines for more than two generating units.
**Exhibit 31.01****CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-Q**I, Michael Mendes, President and Chief Executive Officer of Diamond Foods, Inc., certify asfollows: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJanuary 31, 2006 of Diamond Foods, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     By: /s/ Michael Mendes  Name:  Michael Mendes  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer  Date: March 9, 2006
## Other Youth Topics

## Breadcrumb

            -  Youth Topics 
            -  Opportunity Youth 
            -  Performance Partnership Pilots for Disconnected Youth (P3) 
            -           Round 1 Notice Inviting Applications      

# Round 1 Notice Inviting Applications

## Round 1 Notice Inviting Applications

On November 24, 2014, five Federal agencies came together to offer a new opportunity to help communities overcome the obstacles they face in achieving better outcomes for disconnected youth. For the next 100 days (application deadline: **March 4. 2015**), states, tribes, and municipalities could apply to become a Performance Partnership Pilot (P3) and test innovative, outcome-focused strategies to achieve significant improvements for disconnected youth in educational, employment, and other key outcomes.

The P3 initiative enables up to 10 pilots to blend funds that they already receive from different discretionary programs administered by the Departments of Education, Labor, and Health and Human Services and the Corporation for National and Community Service and the Institute for Museum and Library Services. P3 allows new flexibility under Federal statutes, regulations, and other requirements to overcome barriers and align program and reporting requirements, enabling applicants to propose the most effective ways to use these dollars. In addition, pilots will receive start-up grants of up to $700,000.

Government and community partners already invest considerable attention and resources to meet the needs of America’s disconnected youth. However, practitioners, youth advocates, and program administrators on the front lines of service delivery have let us know that achieving powerful outcomes is still sometimes inhibited by programmatic and administrative obstacles, such as poor coordination and alignment across the multiple systems that serve youth and fragmented data systems that inhibit the flow of information. P3 responds directly to these challenges by offering broad new flexibility in exchange for better outcomes.

To access **webinars and audio clips**, click here.

To view the archived **notice inviting applications**, click here. To view the archived **application package** on grants.gov, click here. To find answers to **frequently asked questions** about the P3 notice inviting applications, click here.
                      - Learn more about the  Performance Partnership Pilots .
                      - Learn more about  Reconnecting Youth .
                      - Read what young people have to say about  what youth need  to become healthy and productive adults.

## Re-Connect Menu

-  Overview 
-  Evaluation 
-  Round 5 (FY 2021) 
-  Round 4 (FY 2018 and FY 2019) 
-  Round 3 (FY 2016) 
-  Round 2 (FY 2015) 
-  Round 1 (FY 2014) 
-  Background
#### § 160.31 Time and manner of sampling.

Except when batch sampling is authorized at an eligible processing plant using licensed inspectors, samples of naval stores to be used for official inspection and certification shall be taken direct from the commercial containers holding such naval stores by or under the immediate supervision of the inspector at the time of inspection.
§ 1710.102 Borrower eligibility for different types of loans. ( a ) *Insured loans under section 305.* Insured loans are normally reserved for the financing of distribution and subtransmission facilities of both distribution and power supply borrowers, including, under certain circumstances, the implementation of demand side management, energy efficiency and energy conservation programs, and on grid and off grid renewable energy systems. In accordance with § 1710.110, the Administrator may require the borrower to obtain no more than 30 percent of the total debt financing required for a proposed project by means of a supplemental loan from another lender without an RUS guarantee.
( b ) *Direct loans under section 4.* Direct loans are normally reserved for the financing of distribution and subtransmission facilities of both distribution and power supply borrowers, including, under certain circumstances, the implementation of demand side management, energy efficiency and energy conservation programs, and on grid and off grid renewable energy systems.
( c ) *One hundred percent loan guarantees under section 306.* Both distribution and power supply borrowers are eligible for 100 percent loan guarantees under section 306 of the RE Act for any or all of the purposes set forth in § 1710.106, including, under certain circumstances, the implementation of demand side management, energy conservation programs, and on grid and off grid renewable energy systems. (See 7 CFR part 1712). These guarantees are normally used to finance bulk transmission and generation facilities, but they may also be used to finance distribution and subtransmission facilities. If a borrower applies for a section 306 loan guarantee to finance all or a portion of distribution and subtransmission facilities, such request will not affect the borrower's eligibility for an insured loan to finance any remaining portion of said facilities or for any future insured loan to finance other distribution or subtransmission facilities. A section 306 loan guarantee, however, may not be used to guarantee a supplemental loan required by § 1710.110.
( d ) *One hundred percent loan guarantees under section 306A.* Under section 306A of the RE Act, both distribution and power supply borrowers are eligible under certain conditions to use an existing section 306 guarantee to refinance advances made on or before July 2, 1986 from a loan made by the Federal Financing Bank. (See 7 CFR part 1786.)
( e ) *Ninety percent guarantees of private-sector loans under section 311.* Under section 311 of the RE Act, both distribution and power supply borrowers in the state of Alaska are eligible under certain conditions to obtain from RUS a 90 percent guarantee of a private-sector loan to refinance their Federal Financing Bank loans. (See 7 CFR part 1786.)
[57 FR 2832, Jan. 24, 1992, as amended at 58 FR 66264, Dec. 20, 1993; 66 FR 66294, Dec. 26, 2001; 78 FR 73365, Dec. 5, 2013]
Exhibit (32.1)





HARLEYSVILLE GROUP INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Harleysville Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael L. Browne, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date:  March 9, 2007 |  | /s/ MICHAEL L. BROWNE                
|                     |  | Michael L. Browne                    
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER



I, Jerrell W. Shelton, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Cryoport, Inc.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 29, 2015



| | /s/ JERRELL W. SHELTON              
| | ------------------------------------
| | JERRELL W. SHELTON                  
| | Chief Executive Officer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1391 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1391

 To prohibit Members of the House of Representatives who are convicted 
    of offenses involving financial or campaign finance fraud from 
     receiving compensation for biographies, media appearances, or 
         expressive or creative works, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2023

Mr. D'Esposito (for himself, Mr. Molinaro, Mr. Lawler, Mr. LaLota, Mr. 
  Langworthy, and Mr. Williams of New York) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit Members of the House of Representatives who are convicted 
    of offenses involving financial or campaign finance fraud from 
     receiving compensation for biographies, media appearances, or 
         expressive or creative works, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Fortune for Fraud Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING MEMBERS OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONVICTED FOR 
              FINANCIAL OR CAMPAIGN FINANCE OFFENSES FROM RECEIVING 
              COMPENSATION FOR BIOGRAPHIES, MEDIA APPEARANCES, OR 
              EXPRESSIVE OR CREATIVE WORKS.

    (a) Prohibition.--A Member of the House of Representatives who is 
finally convicted of an offense described in subsection (b) may not, 
when serving as a Member or at any time after serving as a Member, 
receive compensation, or enter into an agreement to receive 
compensation, for a biography, media appearance, or an expressive or 
creative work.
    (b) Offenses Described.--An offense described in this paragraph 
is--
            (1) any offense described in subparagraph (B) of section 
        8332(o)(2) of title 5, United States Code, without regard to 
        whether the offense is described in subparagraph (A) of such 
        section; or
            (2) any offense which is based on a violation of the 
        Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101 et 
        seq.).
    (c) Penalty.--An individual who violates subsection (a) shall be 
subject to a civil money penalty of not to exceed $10,000,000 for each 
such violation.
    (d) Definition.--In this Act, the term ``Member of the House of 
Representatives'' includes a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the 
Congress.
                                 <all>
```
M. P. No. 79-372.

#### The School Committee of the City of Providence *v.*Board of Regents for Education.

*Vincent J. Piccirilli,*for petitioner. *Nótale L. Urso, Thomas J. Liguori, Jr.,*for respondent.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 APRIL 7, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-11645

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 00-00056-CR-HLM-4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AUTRY JAMES FOSTER,

a.k.a. Archie Foster,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

_________________________

(April 7, 2009)

Before BLACK, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Autry James Foster appeals the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence.
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court ruled that Foster was ineligible for relief

under Amendment 706 because he was sentenced as a career offender. We affirm.

The district court did not err by denying Foster’s motion. Foster argues that

the district court was entitled to reduce his sentence because the base offense level

for his underlying crack cocaine offenses has been altered by Amendment 706, but

his argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Moore, 541 F.3d

1323, 1330 (11th Cir. 2008), because Foster was sentenced as a career offender.

Foster also argues that the district court had discretion to reduce his sentence below

the amended range under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S. Ct. 738

(2005), but Booker cannot be used as an independent basis to reduce a sentence.

See United States v. Jones, 548 F.3d 1366, 1369 (11th Cir. 2008).

The denial of Foster’s motion for a reduced sentence is AFFIRMED.

2
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74
38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/21 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Joel A. Friedman., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 2000-2

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling
and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is
included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting
a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  the
Depository Trust Company.


                                     Chevy Chase Auto Receivables Trust 2000-2
                                     By: Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.
                                     Originator of the Trust and Servicer


Date:     03/30/2005                 By:         /s/   Joel A. Friedman
                                           -----------------------------------
                                                  Joel A. Friedman
                                                  Senior Vice President
                                                  and Controller
#### §§ 1753.83-1753.90 [Reserved]
#### § 1734.10 Changes in project objectives or scope.

The recipient shall obtain prior written approval by RUS for any material change to the scope or objectives of the project, including any changes to the scope of work or the budget submitted to RUS. Any material change shall be contained in a revised scope of work plan to be prepared by the recipient, submitted to, and approved by RUS in writing. If RUS does not approve the change and the awardee is unable to fulfill the original purposes of the award, the awardee will work with RUS to return or rescind the financial assistance.