alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128650 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128650 

 COA: 250583 

Wayne CC: 03-004617-01 

ANTHONY GLADNEY COOPER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
#### In the Matter of Edward C. Cosgrove, as District Attorney of Erie County, Petitioner, v Rose D. La Mendola, Individually and as an Associate Judge of the Erie County Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

— Petition unanimously granted, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: In this original article 78 proceeding the Erie County District Attorney seeks a judgment in the nature of prohibition restraining the respondent from enforcing part of an order of County Court. In that order the respondent reinstated informations charging two defendants with driving while intoxicated and directed the District Attorney to modify his policy on accepting guilty pleas to reduced charges in such cases. It is the latter provision which is the subject of this proceeding. The respondent clearly exceeded her authority by ordering the District Attorney to change his plea bargaining procedure, and the extraordinary remedy of prohibition lies. If, as the respondent claims, the directive applies only to the particular cases that were before her on appeal, it is tantamount to an order to the District Attorney to accept pleas to reduced charges. If, on the other hand, the directive does not apply to the cases on appeal, but was intended to instruct the District Attorney on future negotiations, it is gratuitous. In either case, it was an exercise of power that the respondent did not possess. (Art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
§ 1709.213 Evaluation of applications. ( a ) The Agency will establish one or more rating panels to review and rate the grant applications. The panels may include persons not employed by the Agency.
( b ) The rating panel will evaluate and rate all complete applications that meet the eligibility requirements according to the evaluation and selection criteria and weights established in the grant announcement. Panel members may make recommendations for conditions on grant awards to promote successful performance of the grant or to assure compliance with other Federal requirements.
( c ) After all proposals have been evaluated and scored, the proposals, the rankings, recommendations, and comments of the rating panel will be forwarded to the Administrator.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: : NO. 600 ORDERADOPTING RULES 104, 105, JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, AND 115 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF JUDICIALADMINISTRATION ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3 11 dayofNovember, 2023, upon the recommendation ofthe Civil Procedural Rules Committee, the proposal having been published for public comment at 51 Pa.B. 5532 (September4, 2021): It is Ordered pursuant toArticle V, Section 10 ofthe Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rules 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, and 115 of the Pennsylvania Rules ofJudicial Administration are adopted in the attached form. This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. 103(b), and shall be effective on January 1, 2024.
Exhibit 10.12


 


NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF MODIFICATION



 


TO PAYMENT SCHEDULE


 


The Director of the Department of Development of the State of
Ohio, now known as the Ohio Development Services Agency (the "Director") and Intellinetics, Inc. (the "Borrower")
entered into a Loan Agreement dated June 3, 2011, in the original principal amount of $750,000.00 evidenced by a Cognovit Promissory
Note dated June 3, 2011 (the "Note").


 


The parties agree that the Loan Agreement is hereby amended
to authorize the Director to modify the amortization schedule from time to time, setting forth the amount of principal, interest
and service fee payable under the Note. Pursuant to the Company's request, the Director has modified the payment schedule pursuant
to the amortization schedule noted as Amortization Schedule #2, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Revised Schedule").
The Borrower agrees that this Revised Schedule shall supersede all prior amortization schedules, whether in the Note or in an attachment
to the Note, and the undersigned Company acknowledges and authorizes the Director to update the schedule as an attachment to the
Note. All other terms of the Note remain unchanged.


 





	 	BORROWER: Intellinetics, Inc.,
	 	 
	 	an Ohio corporation







 


	 	By:	/s/ William J. Santiago
	 	 	 
	 	Print: William J. Santiago
	 	 
	 	Date: 12/31/2012


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


Exhibit A


 


Summary of Amortization Schedule #2


 


Effective December 31, 2012, Intellinetics and the Ohio State
Development Authority entered into a Notice and Acknowledgement of Modification to Payment Schedule (the “December 31, 2012
Modification #2”) relating to the June 3, 2011 note payable issued by Intellinetics to the Ohio State Development Authority
in the amount of $750,000, bearing interest at a rate of 1.00% per annum for the first 12 months, then interest at rate of 7.00%
per annum for the second 12 months. Pursuant to the December 31, 2012 Modification #2, the Ohio State Development Authority deferred
interest payment for a six month period from December 1, 2012 to May 1, 2013, with the next interest payment due on June 1, 2013.
Under the terms of the June 3, 2011 note, Intellinetics is not obligated to remit payments of principal until September 1, 2013.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1812 

To provide high-skilled visas for nationals of the Republic of Korea, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2013 

Mr. ROSKAM (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. HOLDING, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. 

FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. ROSS, Mr. POLIS, and Mr. SMITH of Washington) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide high-skilled visas for nationals of the Republic 

of Korea, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Partner with Korea 

5 Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1812 IH

1 SEC. 2. RECIPROCAL VISAS FOR NATIONALS OF SOUTH 

2 KOREA. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a)(15)(E) of the Im4 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)) 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘cap7 ital;’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end ‘‘or (iv) solely to per9 form services in a specialty occupation in the United 

10 States if the alien is a national of the Republic of 

11 Korea and with respect to whom the Secretary of 

12 Labor determines and certifies to the Secretary of 

13 Homeland Security and the Secretary of State that 

14 the intending employer has filed with the Secretary 

15 of Labor an attestation under section 212(t)(1);’’. 

16 (b) NUMERICAL LIMITATION.—Section 214(g) of 

17 such Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)) is amended by adding at the 

18 end the following: 

19 ‘‘(12)(A) The Secretary of State may not approve a 

20 number of initial applications submitted for aliens de21 scribed in section 101(a)(15)(E)(iv) that is more than the 

22 applicable numerical limitations set out in this paragraph. 

23 ‘‘(B) The applicable numerical limitation referred to 

24 in subparagraph (A) is 15,000 for each fiscal year. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1812 IH

1 ‘‘(C) The applicable numerical limitation referred to 

2 in subparagraph (A) shall only apply to principal aliens 

3 and not the spouses or children of such aliens.’’. 

4 (c) SPECIALTY OCCUPATION DEFINED.—Section 

5 214(i)(1) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(i)(1)) is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii),’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘clauses (iii) and (iv) of section 101(a)(15)(E),’’. 

8 (d) ATTESTATION.—Section 212(t) of such Act (8 

9 U.S.C. 1182(t)), as added by section 402(b)(2) of the 

10 United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementa11 tion Act (Public Law 108–77; 117 Stat. 941), is amend12 ed— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘or section 101(a)(15)(E)(iii)’’ 

14 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘or clause (iii) 

15 or (iv) of section 101(a)(15)(E)’’; and 

16 (2) in paragraphs (3)(C)(i)(II), (3)(C)(ii)(II), 

17 and (3)(C)(iii)(II), by striking ‘‘or 

18 101(a)(15)(E)(iii)’’ each place it appears. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 1520.1 General statement.

This part is issued in accordance with the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture 7 CFR, part 1—Administrative Regulations, Subpart A—Official Records, § 1.3, Agency Implementing Regulations, for the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). The Secretary's Regulations, as implemented by the regulations in this part govern the availability of records of the Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) to the public.
**Exhibit 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Richard Coglon, President and Secretary of Bradner Ventures Ltd., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the annual report on Form 20-F of Bradner Ventures Ltd. for the year ended November 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bradner Ventures Ltd. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated:  May 31, 2006

/s/ Richard Coglon

Richard Coglon 

President and Secretary

(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bradner Ventures Ltd. and will be retained by Bradner Ventures Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1739.2 Funding availability and application dates and submission. ( a ) The Agency will post a FOA on *www.Grants.gov* that will set forth the total amount of funding available; the maximum and minimum funding for each grant; funding priority; the application submission dates; and the appropriate addresses and agency contact information. The FOA will also outline and explain the procedures for submission of applications, including electronic submissions. The Agency may publish more than one FOA should additional funding become available. This information will also be made available in the RUS Community Connect Grant program application guide and on the RUS Community Connect Grant program website.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the Agency may, in response to a surplus of qualified eligible applications which could not be funded from the previous fiscal year, decline to post a FOA for the following fiscal year and fund said applications without further public notice.
[83 FR 45033, Sept. 5, 2018]
LAKANE T. BROWN

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 4

- 3261

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed February 26, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Michael C. Overstreet , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee

, for Appellant

.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and THOMAS , JJ., CONCUR.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS HYD-1 Under-Canopy Precipitation DataUnder-canopy precipitation measurements were made by the BOREAS HYD-1 science team in 1994, 1995, and 1996 at various flux tower sites in the NSA and SSA. In 1994, these data were collected at the NSA-OJP, NSA-YJP, SSA-OJP, and SSA-YJP sites. Starting in 1995 and ending in 1997, data were collected at the NSA-OBS, NSA-OJP, NSA-YJP, and SSA-OA. These data were collected to support HYD-01 research by measuring the amount of water that falls through the canopy and is intercepted by the ground or moss. These data coincide with volumetric soil moisture measurements made by HYD-01. The data are stored in tabular ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884) or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20000116621Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCuenca, Richard H.*(Oregon State Univ. Corvallis, OR United States)*Hall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Knapp, David E.*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Kelly, Shaun*(Oregon State Univ. Corvallis, OR United States)*Stangel, David E.*(Oregon State Univ. Corvallis, OR United States)*Smith, David E.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL18NAS 1.15:209891/VOL18Rept-2000-03136-0/Vol18Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000116621.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 1738.201 Application submission. ( a ) Loan and loan/grant combination applications must be submitted through the Agency's online application system.
( b ) The Agency may publish additional application submission requirements in the Federal Register.
#### §§ 1717.950-1717.999 [Reserved]
Exhibit 10.8


 






 


Amendment No. 1


 


to the License Agreement of November
16, 2006


(the "License Agreement")


 


between PARI Pharma GmbH and Kamada
Ltd.


 


WHEREAS the parties wish to extend the
period during which they shall negotiate in good faith the terms and conditions of a Supply Agreement, as stipulated in Section
6.4 of the License Agreement;


 


It is hereby agreed to postpone the deadline
for the execution of a definitive Supply Agreement set forth in Section 6.4 of the License Agreement to [*****].


 


All other provisions of the License Agreement
which are not expressly amended by the terms of this Amendment shall remain in effect and without change.


 


 


	/s/ Martin Knoch	 	/s/ David Tsur
	PARI Pharma GmbH	 	Kamada Ltd.
	By: Martin Knoch	 	By: David Tsur
	Title: Managing Director	 	Title: CEO


  


 






[*****] Confidential portions
of this document have been redacted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of C-Chip Technologies Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Stephane Solis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 4th day of March, 2004.



| | /s/ Stephane Solis
Stephane Solis 
Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------

















---
#### Kinney *v.*South and North Alabama Railroad Company.

*Trover.*

1. *Motion for new trial; its effect onfinality of judgment.*— While a motion for a new trial, made after verdict and judgment in the primary court, is pending and undetermined, a stay of execution having been ordered to await the determination of the motion, there is no such final judgment as will support an appeal to this court; and an appeal, taken during the pendency of such motion, will be dismissed.

Appeal from Cullman Circuit Court.

Tried before lion. LeRoy F. Box.

Trover by the appellant against the appellee. The facts necessary to an understanding of the point decided are stated in the opinion.

W. T. L. Cofer, for appellant.

G-eo. Ii. Parker and J. M. Falkner, *contra.*

Per Curiam.

— The appellant, who was the plaintiff in the court below, after verdict and judgment had been rendered against him, made a motion for a new trial. The motion was regularly continued from term to term, and a stay of execution ordered pending the determination of the motion. While that motion was undetermined, and still pending in the circuit court, this appeal was taken.

We are of opinion that the motion to dismiss the appeal must prevail. There is no such final judgment as will support an appeal, and the cause must be dismissed.— *Overton v.*State, 60 Ala. 73; *Montevallo Coal Mining Co. v. Reynolds,*44 Ala. 252.

Appeal dismissed.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Start Talking before They Start Drinking      

# Start Talking before They Start Drinking

Parents play a crucial role in discouraging their children from beginning to use alcohol. The resources below will help parents discuss this important issue with their children and brainstorm ways for them to refuse offers of alcohol from their peers.

http://www.stopalcoholabuse.gov/parents.aspx
```

[109th Congress Public Law 217]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ217.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 332]]

Public Law 109-217
109th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the reappointment of Alan G. Spoon as a citizen regent of 
 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. <<NOTE: Apr. 13, 
                        2006 -  [H.J. Res. 82]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 
in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the 
expiration of the term of Alan G. Spoon of Massachusetts on May 4, 2006, 
is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent for a term of 6 
years. <<NOTE: Effective date.>> The reappointment shall take effect on 
May 5, 2006.

    Approved April 13, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 82 (S.J. Res. 29):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Apr. 4, considered and passed House.
            Apr. 5, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Courtside Acquisition Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the periodending June 30, 2005 (the "Report"), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I CarlD. Harnick, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to 18  U.S.C. Sec.  1350, as adoptedpursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

2.    The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Carl D. Harnick                                                                                        Dated:August 15, 2005             Carl D. Harnick            Vice President and Chief Financial Officer            (Principal Accounting and FinancialOfficer)

----