69628 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2010 / Notices 

for the United States. In such instances, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries of merchandise 

produced by LMEL/LLPL at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction. For a full discussion of 

this clarification, see Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties). 

Consistent with Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties, for companies 

which claimed they had no shipments 

of subject merchandise to the United 

States, i.e., LSIL and Universal Tube and 

Plastic Ind., if any entries of subject 

merchandise produced by these entities 

entered into the United States during 

the period of review, we will instruct 

CBP to liquidate the unreviewed entries 

of merchandise at the all-others rate. 

With respect to entries by companies 

that were not selected for individual 

examination, i.e., Jindal Pipes Limited, 

Maharashtra Seamless Limited, and 

Ratnamani Metals Tubes Ltd., we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate entries of 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by these firms at 6.33 percent, the rate 

established for LMEL/LLPL. See 

Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 33579. 

For companies which reported that 

their supplier (LMEL) had knowledge 

that its merchandise was destined for 

the United States, i.e., Makalu Trading 

Pvt. Ltd., Uttam Galva Steels Ltd., and 

Ushdev International Ltd., and 

otherwise had no shipments or sales of 

their own, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate these entries at the assessment 

amounts applicable to LMEL/LLPL as 

discussed above. 

The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of these 

final results of review. 

Cash-Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of 

these final results of administrative 

review for all shipments of certain 

welded carbon steel standard pipes and 

tubes from India entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

The cash-deposit rates for companies 

under review will be the rates listed 

above; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not listed above, 

the cash-deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent period for that 

company; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the less-than-fair-value investigation 

but the manufacturer is, the cashdeposit rate will be the rate established 

for the most recent period for the 

manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) if 

neither the exporter nor the 

manufacturer has its own rate, the cashdeposit rate will be the all-others rate 

for this proceeding, 7.08 percent. See 

Antidumping Duty Order; Certain 

Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipes 

and Tubes from India, 51 FR 17384 

(May 12, 1986). These deposit 

requirements shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notifications 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: November 5, 2010. 

Edward C. Yang, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix 

1. Date of Sale 

2. Universe of Sales 

3. Adjustment to Sales Price 

4. Warranty Expense 

5. Trading-Company Discount 

6. Bank Charges 

7. Credit-Expense Period 

[FR Doc. 2010–28685 Filed 11–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–855] 

Non-Frozen Apple Juice Concentrate 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of Sunset Review and 

Revocation of Order 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 1, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) initiated the sunset 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on non-frozen apple juice concentrate 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’). Because the domestic 

interested parties did not participate in 

this sunset review, the Department is 

revoking this antidumping duty order. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emeka Chukwudebe, AD/CVD 

Operations, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0219. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 5, 2000, the Department 

issued an antidumping duty order on 

certain non-frozen apple juice 

concentrate from the PRC. See Notice of 

Amended Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain NonFrozen Apple Juice Concentrate From 

the People’s Republic of China, 65 FR 

35606 (June 5, 2000). On November 2, 

2005, the Department published its most 

recent continuation of the order. See 

Notice of Continuation of Antidumping 

Duty Order on Certain Non-Frozen 

Apple Juice Concentrate from the 

People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 66349 

(November 2, 2005) (‘‘Notice of 

Continuation’’). On October 1, 2010, the 

Department initiated a sunset review of 

this order. See Initiation of Five-Year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 60731 (October 

1, 2010). 

We did not receive a notice of intent 

to participate from domestic interested 

parties in this sunset review by the 

deadline date. As a result, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(A), the 

Department determined that no 

domestic interested party intends to 

participate in the sunset review, and on 

October 21, 2010, we notified the 

International Trade Commission, in 

writing, that we intended to issue a final 

determination revoking this 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2010 / Notices 69629 

1As the 60-day extension falls on Saturday, 

February 12, 2011, the deadline for the final results 

of review will be the next business day, which is 

February 14, 2011. 

antidumping duty order. See 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(2). 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this order is 

certain non-frozen apple juice 

concentrate. Apple juice concentrate is 

defined as all non-frozen concentrated 

apple juice with a brix scale of 40 or 

greater, whether or not containing 

added sugar or other sweetening matter, 

and whether or not fortified with 

vitamins or minerals. Excluded from the 

scope of this order are: Frozen 

concentrated apple juice; non-frozen 

concentrated apple juice that has been 

fermented; and non-frozen concentrated 

apple juice to which spirits have been 

added. 

The merchandise subject to this order 

is classified in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) at subheadings 

2106.90.52.00, and 2009.70.00.20 before 

January 1, 2002, and 2009.79.00.20 after 

January 1, 2002. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Determination To Revoke 

Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’) and 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(iii)(B)(3), if no domestic 

interested party files a notice of intent 

to participate, the Department shall, 

within 90 days after the initiation of the 

review, issue a final determination 

revoking the order. Because the 

domestic interested parties did not file 

a notice of intent to participate in this 

sunset review, the Department finds that 

no domestic interested party is 

participating in this sunset review. 

Therefore, consistent with 19 CFR 

351.222(i)(1)(i) and section 751(c)(3)(A) 

of the Act, we are revoking this 

antidumping duty order. Furthermore, 

although 19 CFR 351.222(i)(1)(i) 

identifies the fifth anniversary of the 

publication of the order as the effective 

date, in Parkdale v. United States, the 

Court of International Trade (‘‘CIT’’) 

clarified that the Department’s 

determination of the effective date of 

revocation is a discretionary, not a 

ministerial act. See Parkdale 

International Ltd. v. U.S., 581 F.Supp.2d 

1334 (‘‘Parkdale v. United States’’) (CIT 

2008). Therefore, the effective date of 

revocation of this antidumping duty 

order is November 2, 2010, the fifth 

anniversary of the date of publication in 

the Federal Register of the most recent 

notice of continuation of this 

antidumping duty order. See Notice of 

Continuation. 

Effective Date of Revocation 

Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the 

Department intends to issue instructions 

to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 

15 days after publication of this notice, 

to terminate the suspension of 

liquidation of the merchandise subject 

to this order entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, on or after November 2, 

2010. Entries of subject merchandise 

prior to the effective date of revocation 

will continue to be subject to 

suspension of liquidation and 

antidumping duty deposit requirements. 

The Department will complete any 

pending administrative reviews of this 

order and will conduct administrative 

reviews of subject merchandise entered 

prior to the effective date of revocation 

in response to appropriately filed 

requests of review. 

This five-year (‘‘sunset’’) review and 

notice are published in accordance with 

sections 751(c) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: November 8, 2010. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28678 Filed 11–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–924] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip From the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Time 

Limit for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 15, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Martin, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 4, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3936. 

Background 

On December 23, 2009, Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published the 

notice of the initiation of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

on polyethylene terephthalate film, 

sheet, and strip from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’), covering the 

period November 6, 2008, through 

October 31, 2009. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Request for 

Revocation in Part, 74 FR 68229 

(December 23, 2009). 

On August 16, 2010, the Department 

published the preliminary results of this 

review. See Polyethylene Terephthalate 

Film, Sheet, and Strip From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 49893 (August 16, 2010). 

The final results are currently due on 

December 14, 2010. 

Extension of Time Limits for Final 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), requires 

the Department to issue the final results 

in an administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order 120 days after 

the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. The Department 

may, however, extend the deadline for 

completion of the final results of an 

administrative review to 180 days if it 

determines it is not practicable to 

complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. The Department 

may extend the time for the final results 

without extending the time for the 

preliminary results, if such final results 

are made not later than 300 days after 

the date on which the preliminary 

results are published. See section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2). 

The Department requires additional 

time to complete this review because 

the Department recently issued a 

revision of the valuation of the labor 

rate for the final results of the 

administrative review using a simple 

average industry-specific wage rate. The 

Department must analyze and consider 

significant issues raised in the parties’ 

comments and post-preliminary 

submissions. Thus, it is not practicable 

to complete this review by the current 

due date. Therefore, we are extending 

the time for the completion of the final 

results of this review by an additional 

60 days to February 12, 2011.1

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES