alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1126.62 Announcement of producer prices. On or before the 13th day after the end of each month, the market administrator shall announce the following prices and information: ( a ) The producer price differential;
( b ) The protein price;
( c ) The nonfat solids price;
( d ) The other solids price;
( e ) The butterfat price;
( f ) The somatic cell adjustment rate;
( g ) The average butterfat, protein, nonfat solids, and other solids content of producer milk; and
( h ) The statistical uniform price for milk containing 3.5 percent butterfat, computed by combining the Class III price and the producer price differential.
[64 FR 478004, Sept. 1, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 82841, Dec. 28, 2000; 68 FR 7069, Feb. 12, 2003]
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 68831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28209]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 1, 2010 and October 5, 2010, the 
National Science Foundation published notices in the Federal Register 
of permit applications received. Permits were issued on November 1, 
2010 and November 3, 2010, respectively, to:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Sanders...................  Permit No. 2011-019.
Yu-Ping Chin........................  Permit No. 2011-018.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-28209 Filed 11-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice System Involvement      

# Resource: Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice System Involvement

This fact sheet (PDF, 2 pages) explains the limited cross-system collaboration between the child welfare and juvenile justice systems to provide youth and families with the services they need. The fact sheet presents risk factors for and dual involvement with the child welfare and juvenile justice systems, key federal programs, promising practices, and more.**Learn more** (PDF, 2 pages).
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 30, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00396

- CR

Roy ALVAREZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR6084 Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 368 U.S. 738 (1967). This court previously issued an order setting a deadline for appellant to file a pro se brief if appellant desired to file such a brief. On November 25, 2015, appellant filed a motion requesting access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State

, 436 S.W.3d 313, 321 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant’s motion to access the record is GRANTED. The clerk of this court is instructed to send a paper copy of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record for this appeal to appellant with this order.

If, after reviewing the record, appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so within thirty days from the date of this order. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than thirty days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this

court.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of November, 2015

._____________________________ ______ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 15

- 00084

- CR
Oscar GOMEZ , Appellant

v. The STATE The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR11049 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2015
DIS MISSED
On February 24, 2015 , we notified the appellant that the trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Additionally, the clerk’s record contains a written waiver signed by the appellant pursuant to which he entered a plea of nolo contendere

. The trial court’s judgment also r eflects that the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. Therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2).04

- 15

- 00084

- CR

In our February 24, 2015 order, we warned the appellant that “[this] appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” See id. R. 25.2(d). We ordered that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless the appellant caused an amended trial court certification to be filed by March 26, 2015 that showed the appellant has the right of appeal. See id. R. 25.2(d),
37.1 ; see also Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 176 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). No response was filed. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

PER CURIAM
Do not publish

- 2

-
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*MAURICE HAMMOND

(AC 23483)

Schaller, Bishop and Dupont, Js.

Argued October 20

officially released December 2, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### § 1726.21 New materials.

The borrower shall purchase only new materials and equipment unless otherwise approved by RUS, on a case by case basis, prior to the purchase.
§ 1734.30 Use of combination loan and grant. ( a ) A combination loan and grant may be used by eligible organizations as defined in § 1734.4 for distance learning and telemedicine projects to finance 100 percent of the cost of approved purposes contained in § 1734.31 provided that no financial assistance may exceed the maximum amount for the year in which the combination loan and grant is made published in the funding opportunity posted on *www.grants.gov* on an annual basis.
( b ) Applicants must meet the minimum eligibility requirement for determining the extent to which the project serves rural areas as determined in § 1734.26(b)
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Share with Youth: Career Video Collection      

# Share with Youth: Career Video Collection

This video collection depicts a portrait of life in hundreds of careers, highlighting the job responsibilities, work settings, wages, educational requirements, and employment trends for a broad range of occupations.

http://www.careeronestop.org/Videos/video-library.aspx?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Share-with-Youth
Nicor Inc.   
                                                   Form 10-K    
                                                   Exhibit 21.01


                           Nicor Inc.
                          Subsidiaries         
                      At December 31, 1997


                                                        State or
                                                    Jurisdiction of
Registrant                                           Incorporation 

Nicor Inc.                                              Illinois

Subsidiaries of Registrant*

   Gas Distribution
   Nicor Gas Company                                    Illinois
       NI-Gas Exploration, Inc.                         Illinois

   Shipping
   Birdsall, Inc.                                       Florida
       Belize Container Terminals Ltd.                  Belize
       Birdsall de Mexico, S.A.                         Mexico
       Birdsall Shipping Co., Ltd. (85%)                Liberia
           Birdsall Shipping, S.A. (38%)                Panama
       Seven Seas Insurance Company, Inc.               Florida
       Transfresca, S.A.                                Honduras
       Tropic Equipment Leasing Inc.                    Delaware
       Tropical Shipping and Construction Co., Ltd.     Bahamas
           Birdsall Shipping Co., Ltd. (15%)            Liberia
           Birdsall Shipping, S.A. (62%)                Panama
           Container Terminals, Ltd.                    Bahamas
           Freship, S.A.                                Dominican
                                                           Republic
           Seven Seas Insurance Company Ltd.            Bahamas
           Tropical Shipping International, Ltd.        Bahamas
       Tropical Shipping, Inc.                          Delaware
       Tropical Shipping of Canada Inc.                 Delaware


These wholly owned subsidiaries are included in the consolidated
financial statements of
Nicor Inc.


*  List includes active subsidiaries in reportable segments only
and omits certain subsidiaries which in the aggregate do not constitute a 
significant subsidiary.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**41 CA 14-01346**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

KENNETH F. MAVING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LISA M. MAVING, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (SHARI JO REICH OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Tracey A. Bannister, J.), entered November 13, 2013. The order granted the quantum meruit application of defendant for attorneys’ fees.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and defendant’s application is denied.

Memorandum: In this divorce action, plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant’s quantum meruit application for attorneys’ fees. The parties’ stipulation of settlement, which was incorporated but not merged into the judgment of divorce, provided that defendant could make an application for attorneys’ fees within 15 days of the date of the stipulation. Defendant’s attorney, however, did not file the application until almost six months after the date of the stipulation.

Plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s late application for attorneys’ fees, which was in violation of the stipulation of settlement. We agree. Because “[m]arital settlement agreements are judicially favored” ( Simkin v Blank , 19 NY3d 46, 52), “[o]nly where there is cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, collusion, mistake or accident, will a party be relieved from the consequences of a stipulation made during litigation” ( Hallock v State of New York , 64 NY2d 224, 230, citing Matter of Frutiger , 29 NY2d 143, 149-150). Here, defendant asserts that her attorney mistakenly thought he had 30 days from the entry of judgment of divorce to file the application. We conclude, however, that the unilateral mistake of defendant’s attorney does not excuse defendant’s failure to comply with the terms of a stipulation where, as here, the language in the stipulation is clear, unequivocal, and unambiguous ( see Morey v Sings , 174 AD2d 870, 872; Hirsch v**-2- 41 CA 14-01346** 

Manzione , 130 AD2d 714, 714-715; 27 Richard A. Lord, Williston on Contracts § 70:104 at 520 [4th ed 1990]).

Entered: February 6, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
§ 1710.201 General. ( a ) The policies, procedures and requirements in this subpart are intended to implement provisions of the loan documents between RUS and the electric borrowers and are also necessary to support approval by RUS of requests for financial assistance.
( b ) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this subpart, RUS may require any power supply or distribution borrower to prepare a new or updated load forecast for RUS approval or to maintain an approved load forecast on an ongoing basis, if such documentation is necessary for RUS to determine loan feasibility, or to ensure compliance under the loan documents.
#### § 1709.212 Application review.

The Agency will review all applications to determine whether the applicant is eligible and whether the application is timely, complete and sufficiently responsive to the requirements set forth in the grant announcement to allow for an informed review. Failure to address any of the required evaluation criteria or to submit all required forms will disqualify the proposal. The Agency reserves the right to contact the applicant to clarify information contained in the proposal to resolve issues related to eligibility and the grant request. Applications that are timely, complete, and responsive will be forwarded for further evaluation. Applications that are late, incomplete, or non-responsive will be rejected.
#### Ante Kurtin, Respondent, v Gating Rope Works, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs. J. I. Hass Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; Pan American, Third-Party Defendant.

Appeal by third-party defendant J. I. Hass Company from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 10, 1979, which granted the plaintiffs motion to increase the *ad damnum*clause of his complaint from $500,000 to $3,500,000. Order modified so as to limit the increase in the *ad damnum*clause to $1,000,000. As so modified, order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant. Special Term improvidently exercised its discre*807tion in granting amendment of plaintiiFs *ad damnum*clause above the amount indicated. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
#### § 1730.2 RUS policy.

It is RUS policy to require that all property of a borrower be operated and maintained properly in accordance with the requirements of each borrower's loan documents. It is also RUS policy to provide financial assistance only to borrowers whose operations and maintenance practices and records are satisfactory or to those who are taking corrective actions expected to make their operations and maintenance practices and records satisfactory to RUS.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00253- CV

Com bin ed F inan cial Holdi ngs Trus t, Appellant

v. The Coun ty of Bastrop, Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ASTROP CO UNTY, 335 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 11,8 83, H ONO RAB LE CHRI STO P HER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A ND U M O PI N I O N Appellant Combined Financ ial Holdings Trust , t h ro u gh its Trustee Wil liam H. Mikulin, filed its notice of appea l on April 24, 2015. On J une 16, 2015, the Clerk of this Court sent
a letter notifying appellant that the cler k’s rec ord was overdue and reque sting that it make pay ment
arr ang ements for the cler

k’s rec ord and submit a status r eport reg arding this a ppeal. The overdue

rec ord notice al s o i n fo rmed appellant that failure to make pay ment arr ang ements or respond to the Court’s notice by J une 26, 2015, could subject this appea l to dismiss al for want of prosec ution.

To date, the cler

k’s rec ord in t h i s cause has not been filed and the district cler k has not rec eived any pay

ment. Acc ording ly , we dism iss this appea l for want of pr o s ec u t i o n . S ee Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b), ( c).__________________________________________ J eff Rose, Chief J ustice Be fore Chief Justice Rose, Jus tices Pemberton a nd Field Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: Jul y

10, 2015
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Gladstone Investment Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2005 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 10, 2005  /s/ David Gladstone
§ 1770.4 Record storage media. Each RUS borrower has the flexibility to select its own storage media subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The storage media must have a life expectancy at least equal to the applicable retention period provided for in the master index of records, unless there is quality transfer from one media to another with no loss of data. Each transfer of data from one media to another must be verified for accuracy and documented.
( b ) Each borrower is required to implement internal control procedures that assure the reliability of, and ready access to, data stored on machine-readable media. Internal control procedures must be documented by a responsible supervisory official.
( c ) The records shall be indexed and retained in such a manner that they are easily accessible.
( d ) The borrower shall have the hardware and software available to locate, identify, and reproduce the records in readable form without loss of clarity.
( e ) At the expiration of the retention period, the borrower may use any appropriate method to destroy records.
( f ) When any records are lost or destroyed before the expiration of the retention period set forth in the master index, a certified statement shall be added to the master index listing, as far as may be determined, the records lost or destroyed and describing the circumstances of the premature loss or destruction.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, William F.Weissman, Chief Financial Officer of Kanbay International, Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certify, that:

(1)         The Company’s annualreport on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the“Form 10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany for the periods presented therein.
| /s/ WILLIAM  F. WEISSMAN                                          | * * |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| William F. Weissman*Chief Financial Officer*  March 16, 2006 | * * |

 

----