alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re the Matter of the Retirement of Marlene DAVIS.

No. 11-07.

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

April 27, 2007.

Before GREENE, Chief Judge, and KASOLD, HAGEL, MOORMAN, LANCE, DAVIS, and SCHOELEN, Judges.

*270ORDER

GREENE, Chief Judge:

Marlene Davis was appointed as the Court’s first Administrative Manager on July 30, 1989. She was later appointed as Deputy Executive Officer and served superbly in both capacities until her retirement on April 28, 2007. During these 18 years, she played an instrumental and vital role in the creation and operation of this, the Nation’s newest national judicial tribunal.

As the Administrative Manager, Ms. Davis used her considerable talents, resourcefulness, creativity, common sense, and energy to ensure that the Court came into being smoothly. Her exceptional attention to detail and organizational ability guided the Court’s initial build-out at 625 Indiana Avenue and a seamless move into that location. She showed exceptional skill in fostering team loyalty among her staff illustrated when, as Deputy Executive Officer, she oversaw the renovations and the myriad details attendant to the turnover of six judges in two years. She again showed her professionalism and tenacity when she shepherded the three-year project of upgrading security in the garage and first floor lobby. The Court’s Continuation of Operations Plan is the latest example of her resourcefulness, planning skills, and tenacity in dealing with various government agencies. The overwhelming success of the first Court Judicial Conference, and five succeeding Conferences, resulted from Ms. Davis’ organizational and managerial skills as the Conference Administrative Coordinator. The fact that Ms. Davis has received an outstanding performance award in each year she was eligible illustrates her overwhelming value to the Court, and the respect she garners from all who are associated with her.

Ms. Davis has been a trusted advisor to the Clerk and friend and trusted mentor to the entire Court family. She has earned the highest respect of all who have been privileged to benefit from her intelligence and dedication.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, that Marlene Davis, will take with her our gratitude for the years of outstanding service she has rendered to the Court, our admiration for her many accomplishments, the warmth of our continued friendship, and our best wishes.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Report of Castle Arch Real Estate Investment Company, L.L.C. a Nevada corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I, Kirby D. Cochran, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:  a. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  b. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Kirby D. Cochran Kirby D. Cochran, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  Dated May 20, 2008
27–544 

109TH CONGRESS REPT. 109–463 " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session Part 2 

AGRICULTURE RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FOOD AND DRUG 

ADMINISTRATION, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2007 

MAY 16, 2006.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BONILLA, from the Committee on Appropriations, 

submitted the following 

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT 

[To accompany H.R. 5384] 

The Committee on Appropriations submits the following supplemental report, which includes a replacement to page 131 of House 

Report 109–463. This replacement page corrects the ‘‘Description of 

Motion’’ for the rollcall vote. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
(3) 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 2 here HR463.001
#### § 1710.153 Additional requirements and procedures.

Additional requirements and procedures for obtaining RUS financial assistance are set forth in 7 CFR part 1712 for loan guarantees, and in 7 CFR part 1714 for insured loans.
#### § 160.5 Standards for naval stores.

In addition to the standards of identity for spirits of turpentine and rosin and the grade designations for rosin specified in the act, certain standards for naval stores have been promulgated by the Administrator pursuant to the act as indicated in § 160.301 *et seq.*
#### Clay *vs.*Rogers.

Motion. Case 113.

*Motion to dismiss appeal.*

Appeal Irom the Oaviesi. Citcuif.

lecora maae ouTand sworntobe correct, ’YeTthf clerk’having died, no suecessorapnecessary'to*1 file the record, admitted dismissal of appeal.

May 8.

The appellee moved the court to dismiss the appeal, because the transcript of the record was not propely certified. It appeared that the decree appealed from, was rendered 13th July, 1831, appeal prayed and appeal bond executed; but before a copy of the record was made out, the clerk died, aH¿ before the intervention of a circuit court, it was necessary to lodge the record in the office of this court. The record filed being made out by a perSOn who made affidavit, before a justice of the peace;, tllat the sauie was correct,

Motion to dismiss overruled.
EX-4.6



 Exhibit 4.6 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR 
 This amendment number four (“Amendment”) to the
Agreement (as defined below) is entered into by and between Google Ireland Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Ireland whose principal place of business is at Gordon House, Barrow Street, Dublin 4 (“Google”), and AVG
Netherlands B.V. whose principal place of business is at Gatwickstraat 9-39, 1043 GL Amsterdam, The Netherlands (“Company”). 

This Amendment shall be effective from 1 November 2012 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). 

INTRODUCTION 
  

	(A)	Google and AVG Technologies CY Limited are parties to a Google Services Agreement with an effective date of 1 October 2010 (the “GSA”) and a
Google Services Agreement Order Form with an effective date of 1 October 2010 (the “Order Form”), both as amended by Amendment Number One dated 1 December 2011, Amendment Number Two dated 1 June 2012 and Amendment
Number Three dated 1 October 2012 (together the “Agreement”). 

  

	(B)	Pursuant to a Transfer of Contract between AVG Technologies CY Limited, AVG and Google dated 4 January 2012, AVG Technologies CY Limited transferred all of its
rights, obligations and liabilities under the Agreement to Company with effect from 23 December 2011 

  

	(C)	Company and Google now wish to amend the Agreement in the manner set out in this Amendment. 

 AGREED TERMS 
  

	1.	Definitions 

 Capitalised
terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement. 
  

	2.	Order Form Amendment. The Agreement is extended for a period commencing on 1 November 2012 and ending on 30 November 2012. As such, the box entitled
“Term” on the first page of the Order Form shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

 “Term: from the Order Form Effective Date to 30 November 2012.” 
  

	3.	Continuation 

 The
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unchanged except as modified by this Amendment. 
  

	4.	Governing Law and Jurisdiction 

 This Amendment is governed by English law and the parties submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts in relation to any dispute (contractual or non-contractual) concerning this Amendment.








 Signed by the parties on the dates stated below 

 

									
	GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED	 		 	AVG NETHERLANDS B.V.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Graham Law
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ John Little

	Name: Graham Law	 		 	Name: John Little
	Title: Director	 		 	Title: CFO
			
	Date: 31 Oct 2012	 		 	Date: 30.10.2012


  
 2
#### Stanley Moskowitz, Appellant, v. Sandra A. Moskowitz, Respondent.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 5, 1967, reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs, and motion denied insofar as it seeks temporary alimony. On the record under review, defendant has failed to demonstrate her need for support *pendente lite.*The action should proceed to trial promptly. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
## Other Youth Topics

## Breadcrumb

            -  Youth Topics 
            -  Violence Prevention 
            -           National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Communities: Minneapolis      

# National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Communities: Minneapolis

The Blueprint is a community-driven, grassroots response to the issue of youth violence. This collaborative, multi-level approach integrates programming that is designed to serve diverse populations. The Blueprint includes a list of existing and new activities informed by public health principles and aligned with the National Forum framework of prevention, early intervention, re-entry and reinforcement.

###### Point of Contact

**Sasha Cotton**Youth Prevention Coordinator612-673-2729sasha.cotton@minneapolismn.gov

## Resources

                        - Minneapolis Blueprint for Action to Prevent Youth Violence

## Main navigation

- Baltimore
- Cleveland
- Long Beach
- Louisville
- Boston
- Camden
- Chicago
- Detroit
- Memphis
- Minneapolis
- New Orleans
- Philadelphia
- Salinas
- San Jose
- Seattle
#### §§ 1710.128-1710.149 [Reserved]
§ 1737.11 Preapplication determinations. Before submitting an application to RUS, the borrower should consider the following: ( a ) *Area to be served.* The proposed service area should neither include subscribers already receiving adequate service from another telephone system nor leave out unserved pockets of potential subscribers who have indicated an interest in service and are located between the proposed system and neighboring systems. See 7 CFR 1735.11 on Area Coverage and 7 CFR 1735.12 on Nonduplication. In establishing service area boundaries, borrowers should consider the location of adjoining systems, natural boundaries such as rivers and mountains, and economic and cultural features such as trading and community centers.
( b ) *Number of subscribers.* The borrower must estimate the number of subscribers that will request service from the proposed system.
( c ) *Acquisitions.* A borrower considering an acquisition should refer to 7 CFR 1735.20 and RUS Bulletins 320-4, 321-2, 325-1, and 326-1.
( d ) *Mergers and consolidations.* A borrower considering a merger or consolidation should refer to 7 CFR 1735.19.
( e ) *Refinancing.* Restrictions on the use of loan funds for refinancing are contained in 7 CFR 1735.21.
( f ) *Service for nonrural subscribers.* In some situations, RUS loan funds may be used to finance facilities to serve nonrural subscribers. See 7 CFR 1735.13.
( g ) *Loan amount.* The initial loan request is based on the borrower's best estimate of financing needs. RUS requires detailed studies by the borrower to complete the application and the initial estimate is subject to revision.
( h ) *Loans for a portion of a system.* If it is impractical to finance facilities to provide adequate service throughout the borrower's entire telephone service area, RUS will consider a loan application to finance improvements to a portion of a borrower's system.
( i ) *Telecommunications modernization plan.* A borrower applying for hardship or concurrent RUS cost-of-money loans should refer to 7 CFR part 1751, subpart B.
[54 FR 14626, Apr. 12, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39395, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 66256, Dec. 20, 1993; 84 FR 59922, Nov. 7, 2019]
f8k022613ex10v_car.htm


Exhibit 10.5


 


February __, 2013







Worldwide Stock Transfer, LLC


433 Hackensack Ave, Level L


Hackensack, NJ 07601







Re: Authorization to Cancel Shares of Car Charging Group, Inc.







To Whom It May Concern:







Enclosed herewith, please find Stock Certificate No. ___, representing ________shares of common stock in Car Charging Group, Inc. with medallion signature guarantee for immediate cancellation.  







In the event such Certificate is not enclosed herewith and you do not receive such certificate within 2 business days of receipt of this letter, please accept the attached affidavit in its place.







Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.







Sincerely,


_______________________


Name:  


Address: 


Telephone Number:









cc: Michael D. Farkas, Car Charging Group, Inc.

















*This document shall be held in escrow and destroyed upon payment in full of the Note.









  





  











  













AFFIDAVIT OF LOST, DESTROYED OR MUTILATED CERTIFICATE







The undersigned, being duly sworn, deposes and says:







1.I, ____________, am the true, lawful, present and sole owner of Car Charging Group, Inc. Stock Certificate No. ______, issued on February ___, 2013 in the amount of __________ shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Certificate”);







2.That the Certificate was not endorsed;







3.That neither the Certificate nor the rights of the undersigned have in whole or in part been sold, assigned, hypothecated, pledged or otherwise transferred;







4.That the undersigned had made a diligent search for the Certificate, has not found the Certificate and believes that the Certificate is lost;







5.That the undersigned hereby agrees to immediately surrender to Car Charging Group, Inc. (the “Company”) the lost Certificate should it hereafter come into the undersigned’s possession or control;







6.That this affidavit is made to direct and authorize the Company and its transfer agent to cancel the Certificate and record the cancellation of the shares evidenced in the Certificate from its records; and







7.That Manhattan Charging LLC hereby indemnifies and holds the Company and its transfer agent harmless form any and all loss, claims, damage, counsel fees and costs incurred, or to be incurred, by reason of the loss of the Certificate or by reason of future presentment of such lost Certificate to the Company or its transfer agent, for transfer.







I hereby state that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.









Dated this _____ day of February, 2013.









________________________________                         









STATE OF ______________)


  )


COUNTY OF_____________)







Subscribed and sworn to before me this ______ day of February, 2013.




 



	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Notary Public in and the State of __________





 















*This document shall be held in escrow and destroyed upon payment in full of the Note.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1430.215 [Reserved]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Pregnancy Assistance Fund (PAF) Program Videos      

# Resource: Pregnancy Assistance Fund (PAF) Program Videos

These videos highlight the PAF, a program that supports expectant and parenting teens, women, fathers, and families:
                  - MN Student Parent Support Initiative: Advancing Health and Higher Education for Student Parents —  Describes centers that help Minnesota university and college students with children stay enrolled in school.
                  - Right from the Start: Empowering Young Parents for Success —  Describes a Missouri program that helps parents, including hard-to-reach young people like youth who are homeless, gain the skills they need to support their children.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6699
ARMAND KOCHI, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DONALD GUILLORY, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-788-R) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996 Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Armand Kochi, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,we deny a certificate of probable cause; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Kochi v. Guillory , No. CA-95-788-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 24, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:

*1. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft,*                     Frankfurt, Germany; to acquire up to 100 percent of the voting shares of PB Capital Corporation and PB (USA) Realty Corporation, both of New York, New York, and thereby engage in brokering, servicing loans and other extensions of credit, and in commercial real estate lending and leasing, pursuant to sections 225.28(b)(1) and (b)(3) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 5, 2010.

Robert de V. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-28403 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 1260.104 Committee.

*Committee* means the Beef Promotion Operating Committee established pursuant to the Act and this subpart.
9904.409-62 Exemption. This Standard shall not apply where compensation for the use of tangible capital assets is based on use rates or allowances provided by other appropriate Federal acquisition regulations such as those governing: ( a ) Educational institutions,
( b ) State, local, and Federally recognized Indian tribal government, or
( c ) Construction equipment rates (See 48 CFR 31.105(d)).