1522 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

CALIFORNIA—2006 24-HOUR PM2.5 NAAQS—Continued 

[Primary and secondary] 

Designated area 

Designation a Classification 

Date 1 Type Date 2 Type 

That portion of Riverside County which lies 

to the west of a line described as follows: 

Beginning at the Riverside-San Diego 

County boundary and running north along 

the range line common to Range 4 East 

and Range 3 East, San Bernardino Base 

and Meridian; then east along the Township line common to Township 8 South 

and Township 7 South; then north along 

the range line common to Range 5 East 

and Range 4 East; then west along the 

Township line common to Township 6 

South and Township 7 South to the southwest corner of Section 34, Township 6 

South, Range 4 East; then north along the 

west boundaries of Sections 34, 27, 22, 

15, 10, and 3, Township 6 South, Range 

4 East; then west along the Township line 

common to Township 5 South and Township 6 South; then north along the range 

line common to Range 4 East and Range 

3 East; then west along the south boundaries of Sections 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 

18, Township 5 South, Range 3 East; 

then north along the range line common 

to Range 2 East and Range 3 East; to the 

Riverside-San Bernardino County Line 

(excluding the lands of the Santa Rosa 

Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians).

....................................... Nonattainment .............. 02/12/16 ....................... Serious. 

That part of the lands of the Santa Rosa 

Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians which is 

excluded from the Riverside County (part) 

nonattainment area.

....................................... Nonattainment .............. 02/12/16 ....................... Serious. 

San Bernardino County (part) .............................. ....................................... Nonattainment .............. 02/12/16 ....................... Serious. 

That portion of San Bernardino County 

which lies south and west of a line described as follows: Beginning at the San 

Bernardino-Riverside County boundary 

and running north along the range line 

common to Range 3 East and Range 2 

East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian; 

then west along the Township line common to Township 3 North and Township 2 

North to the San Bernardino-Los Angeles 

County boundary.

....................................... Nonattainment .............. 02/12/16 ....................... Serious. 

a Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified. 

1This date is 30 days after November 13, 2009, unless otherwise noted. 

2This date is July 2, 2014, unless otherwise noted. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–33304 Filed 1–12–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0718; FRL–9940–29] 

Methacrylate Type Copolymer, 

Compound With Aminomethyl 

Propanol; Tolerance Exemption 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of 2-propenoic 

acid, 2-methyl-, polymers with tert-Bu 

acrylate, Me methacrylate, polyethylene 

glycol methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers 

and vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol when used as an inert 

ingredient in a pesticide chemical 

formulation. BASF Corporation 

submitted a petition to EPA under the 

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 

(FFDCA), requesting an exemption from 

the requirement of a tolerance. This 

regulation eliminates the need to 

establish a maximum permissible level 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 1523 

for residues of 2-propenoic acid, 2- 

methyl-, polymers with tert-Bu acrylate, 

Me methacrylate, polyethylene glycol 

methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers and 

vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol on food or feed commodities. 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

January 13, 2016. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or March 14, 2016, and must be filed 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0718, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lewis, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 

through the Government Printing 

Office’s e-CFR site at http://

www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/

40tab_02.tpl. 

C. Can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2015–0718 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before March 14, 2016. Addresses for 

mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 40 

CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2015–0718, by one of the following 

methods. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be CBI or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on commenting 

or visiting the docket, along with more 

information about dockets generally, is 

available at http://www.epa.gov/

dockets. 

II. Background and Statutory Findings 

In the Federal Register of November 

23, 2015 (80 FR 72941) (FRL–9936–73), 

EPA issued a document pursuant to 

FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a, 

announcing the receipt of a pesticide 

petition (PP IN–10843) filed by BASF 

Corporation, 26 Davis Dr. Research 

Triangle Park, NC, 27709. The petition 

requested that 40 CFR 180.960 be 

amended by establishing an exemption 

from the requirement of a tolerance 

for residues of 2-propenoic acid, 

2-methyl-, polymers with tert-Bu 

acrylate, Me methacrylate, polyethylene 

glycol methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers 

and vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol; CAS Reg. No. 1515872–09–9. 

That document included a summary of 

the petition prepared by the petitioner 

and solicited comments on the 

petitioner’s request. EPA received one 

comment to the Notice of Filing. 

Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA 

allows EPA to establish an exemption 

from the requirement for a tolerance (the 

legal limit for a pesticide chemical 

residue in or on a food) only if EPA 

determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’ 

Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA 

defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from aggregate exposure to the 

pesticide chemical residue, including 

all anticipated dietary exposures and all 

other exposures for which there is 

reliable information.’’ This includes 

exposure through drinking water and 

use in residential settings, but does not 

include occupational exposure. Section 

408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 

give special consideration to exposure 

of infants and children to the pesticide 

chemical residue in establishing an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to infants and children from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide 

chemical residue . . .’’ and specifies 

factors EPA is to consider in 

establishing an exemption. 

III. Risk Assessment and Statutory 

Findings 

EPA establishes exemptions from the 

requirement of a tolerance only in those 

cases where it can be shown that the 

risks from aggregate exposure to 

pesticide chemical residues under 

reasonably foreseeable circumstances 

will pose no appreciable risks to human 

health. In order to determine the risks 

from aggregate exposure to pesticide 

inert ingredients, the Agency considers 

the toxicity of the inert in conjunction 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
1524 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

with possible exposure to residues of 

the inert ingredient through food, 

drinking water, and through other 

exposures that occur as a result of 

pesticide use in residential settings. If 

EPA is able to determine that a finite 

tolerance is not necessary to ensure that 

there is a reasonable certainty that no 

harm will result from aggregate 

exposure to the inert ingredient, an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance may be established. 

Consistent with FFDCA section 

408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the 

available scientific data and other 

relevant information in support of this 

action and considered its validity, 

completeness and reliability and the 

relationship of this information to 

human risk. EPA has also considered 

available information concerning the 

variability of the sensitivities of major 

identifiable subgroups of consumers, 

including infants and children. In the 

case of certain chemical substances that 

are defined as polymers, the Agency has 

established a set of criteria to identify 

categories of polymers expected to 

present minimal or no risk. The 

definition of a polymer is given in 40 

CFR 723.250(b) and the exclusion 

criteria for identifying these low-risk 

polymers are described in 40 CFR 

723.250(d). 2-Propenoic acid, 

2-methyl-, polymers with tert-Bu 

acrylate, Me methacrylate, polyethylene 

glycol methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers 

and vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol conforms to the definition of 

a polymer given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) 

and meets the following criteria that are 

used to identify low-risk polymers. 

1. The polymer is not a cationic 

polymer nor is it reasonably anticipated 

to become a cationic polymer in a 

natural aquatic environment. 

2. The polymer does contain as an 

integral part of its composition the 

atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, and 

oxygen. 

3. The polymer does not contain as an 

integral part of its composition, except 

as impurities, any element other than 

those listed in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii). 

4. The polymer is neither designed 

nor can it be reasonably anticipated to 

substantially degrade, decompose, or 

depolymerize. 

5. The polymer is manufactured or 

imported from monomers and/or 

reactants that are already included on 

the TSCA Chemical Substance 

Inventory or manufactured under an 

applicable TSCA section 5 exemption. 

6. The polymer is not a water 

absorbing polymer with a number 

average molecular weight (MW) greater 

than or equal to 10,000 daltons. 

Additionally, the polymer also meets 

as required the following exemption 

criteria specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e). 

7. The polymer does not contain, as 

an integral part of its composition, 

perfluoroalkyl moieties consisting of a 

CF3- or longer chain length. 

8. The polymer’s number average MW 

of 2,600 is greater than 1,000 and less 

than 10,000 daltons. The polymer 

contains less than 10% oligomeric 

material below MW 500 and less than 

25% oligomeric material below MW 

1,000, and the polymer does not contain 

any reactive functional groups. 

Thus, 2-propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 

polymers with tert-Bu acrylate, Me 

methacrylate, polyethylene glycol 

methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers and 

vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol meets the criteria for a 

polymer to be considered low risk under 

40 CFR 723.250. Based on its 

conformance to the criteria in this unit, 

no mammalian toxicity is anticipated 

from dietary, inhalation, or dermal 

exposure to 2-propenoic acid, 2-methyl- 

, polymers with tert-Bu acrylate, Me 

methacrylate, polyethylene glycol 

methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers and 

vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol. 

IV. Aggregate Exposures 

For the purposes of assessing 

potential exposure under this 

exemption, EPA considered that 2- 

propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, polymers 

with tert-Bu acrylate, Me methacrylate, 

polyethylene glycol methacrylate C16- 

C18-alkyl ethers and vinylpyrrolidone, 

tert-Bu 2-ethylhexaneperoxoateinitiated, compounds with 2-amino-2- 

methyl-1-propanol could be present in 

all raw and processed agricultural 

commodities and drinking water, and 

that non-occupational non-dietary 

exposure was possible. The number 

average MW of 2-propenoic acid, 2- 

methyl-, polymers with tert-Bu acrylate, 

Me methacrylate, polyethylene glycol 

methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers and 

vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol is 2600 daltons. Generally, a 

polymer of this size would be poorly 

absorbed through the intact 

gastrointestinal tract or through intact 

human skin. Since 2-propenoic acid, 2- 

methyl-, polymers with tert-Bu acrylate, 

Me methacrylate, polyethylene glycol 

methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers and 

vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol conform to the criteria that 

identify a low-risk polymer, there are no 

concerns for risks associated with any 

potential exposure scenarios that are 

reasonably foreseeable. The Agency has 

determined that a tolerance is not 

necessary to protect the public health. 

V. Cumulative Effects From Substances 

With a Common Mechanism of Toxicity 

Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA 

requires that, when considering whether 

to establish, modify, or revoke a 

tolerance, the Agency consider 

‘‘available information’’ concerning the 

cumulative effects of a particular 

pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other 

substances that have a common 

mechanism of toxicity.’’ 

EPA has not found 2-propenoic acid, 

2-methyl-, polymers with tert-Bu 

acrylate, Me methacrylate, polyethylene 

glycol methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers 

and vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol to share a common mechanism 

of toxicity with any other substances, 

and 2-propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 

polymers with tert-Bu acrylate, Me 

methacrylate, polyethylene glycol 

methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers and 

vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol does not appear to produce a 

toxic metabolite produced by other 

substances. For the purposes of this 

tolerance action, therefore, EPA has 

assumed that 2-propenoic acid, 2- 

methyl-, polymers with tert-Bu acrylate, 

Me methacrylate, polyethylene glycol 

methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers and 

vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol does not have a common 

mechanism of toxicity with other 

substances. For information regarding 

EPA’s efforts to determine which 

chemicals have a common mechanism 

of toxicity and to evaluate the 

cumulative effects of such chemicals, 

see EPA’s Web site at http://

www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative. 

VI. Additional Safety Factor for the 

Protection of Infants and Children 

Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA 

provides that EPA shall apply an 

additional tenfold margin of safety for 

infants and children in the case of 

threshold effects to account for prenatal 

and postnatal toxicity and the 

completeness of the data base unless 

EPA concludes that a different margin of 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 1525 

safety will be safe for infants and 

children. Due to the expected low 

toxicity of 2-propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 

polymers with tert-Bu acrylate, Me 

methacrylate, polyethylene glycol 

methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers and 

vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol, EPA has not used a safety 

factor analysis to assess the risk. For the 

same reasons the additional tenfold 

safety factor is unnecessary. 

VII. Determination of Safety 

Based on the conformance to the 

criteria used to identify a low-risk 

polymer, EPA concludes that there is a 

reasonable certainty of no harm to the 

U.S. population, including infants and 

children, from aggregate exposure to 

residues of 2-propenoic acid, 

2-methyl-, polymers with tert-Bu 

acrylate, Me methacrylate, polyethylene 

glycol methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers 

and vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol. 

VIII. Other Considerations 

A. Existing Exemptions From a 

Tolerance 

Not available. 

B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology 

An analytical method is not required 

for enforcement purposes since the 

Agency is establishing an exemption 

from the requirement of a tolerance 

without any numerical limitation. 

C. International Residue Limits 

In making its tolerance decisions, EPA 

seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with 

international standards whenever 

possible, consistent with U.S. food 

safety standards and agricultural 

practices. EPA considers the 

international maximum residue limits 

(MRLs) established by the Codex 

Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as 

required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). 

The Codex Alimentarius is a joint 

United Nations Food and Agriculture 

Organization/World Health 

Organization food standards program, 

and it is recognized as an international 

food safety standards-setting 

organization in trade agreements to 

which the United States is a party. EPA 

may establish a tolerance that is 

different from a Codex MRL; however, 

FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that 

EPA explain the reasons for departing 

from the Codex level. 

The Codex has not established a MRL 

for 2-propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 

polymers with tert-Bu acrylate, Me 

methacrylate, polyethylene glycol 

methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers and 

vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol. 

IX. Conclusion 

Accordingly, EPA finds that 

exempting residues of 2-propenoic acid, 

2-methyl-, polymers with tert-Bu 

acrylate, Me methacrylate, polyethylene 

glycol methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl ethers 

and vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2- 

ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, 

compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1- 

propanol from the requirement of a 

tolerance will be safe. 

X. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This action establishes a tolerance 

under FFDCA section 408(d) in 

response to a petition submitted to the 

Agency. The Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 

of actions from review under Executive 

Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory 

Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993). Because this action 

has been exempted from review under 

Executive Order 12866, this action is 

not subject to Executive Order 13211, 

entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning 

Regulations That Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 

FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive 

Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997). This action does not 

contain any information collections 

subject to OMB approval under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require 

any special considerations under 

Executive Order 12898, entitled 

‘‘Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as 

the tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), do not apply. 

This action directly regulates growers, 

food processors, food handlers, and food 

retailers, not States or tribes, nor does 

this action alter the relationships or 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities established by Congress 

in the preemption provisions of FFDCA 

section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency 

has determined that this action will not 

have a substantial direct effect on States 

or tribal governments, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the States or tribal 

governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined 

that Executive Order 13132, entitled 

‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999) and Executive Order 13175, 

entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 

67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply 

to this action. In addition, this action 

does not impose any enforceable duty or 

contain any unfunded mandate as 

described under Title II of the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 

1501 et seq.). 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act 

(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

EPA received one comment to the 

Notice of Filing. The commenter stated 

that the application of these chemicals 

on food should not be allowed and are 

poisoning the environment. The Agency 

understands the commenter’s concerns 

and recognizes that some individuals 

believe that pesticides should be banned 

on agricultural crops and that they are 

poisoning the environment. However, 

the existing legal framework provided 

by section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug 

and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) states that 

tolerances may be set when persons 

seeking such tolerances or exemptions 

have demonstrated that the pesticide 

meets the safety standard imposed by 

that statute. The citizen’s comment 

appears to be directed at the underlying 

statute and not EPA’s implementation of 

it; the citizen has made no contention 

that EPA has acted in violation of the 

statutory framework. 

XI. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
1526 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: January 4, 2016. 

G. Jeffery Herndon, 

Acting Director, Registration Division, Office 

of Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.960, alphabetically add the 

following polymer to the table to read as 

follows: 

§ 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the 

requirement of a tolerance. 

* * * * * 

Polymer CAS No. 

*******

2-propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, polymers with tert-Bu acrylate, Me methacrylate, polyethylene glycol methacrylate C16-C18-alkyl 

ethers and vinylpyrrolidone, tert-Bu 2-ethylhexaneperoxoate-initiated, compounds with 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol, minimum number average molecular weight (in amu), 2,600 ......................................................................................................... 1515872–09–9 

* * * * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2016–00533 Filed 1–12–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0680; FRL–9940–90] 

Propyzamide; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a 

tolerance for residues of propyzamide, 

also known as pronamide, in or on leaf 

lettuce. Dow AgroSciences, LLC 

requested this tolerance under the 

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 

(FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

January 13, 2016. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before March 14, 2016, and must 

be filed in accordance with the 

instructions provided in 40 CFR part 

178 (see also Unit I.C. of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0680, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lewis, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR 

site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/

40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP test 

guidelines referenced in this document 

electronically, please go to http://

www.epa.gov/test-guidelines-pesticidesand-toxic-substances. 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify the request by the docket ID 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0680 in 

the subject line on the first page of your 

submission. All objections and requests 

for a hearing must be in writing, and 

must be received by the Hearing Clerk 

on or before March 14, 2016. Addresses 

for mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 40 

CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2014–0680, by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be CBI or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES