alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 0914 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 -NM - 166 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
#### Cathleen E. GOLDEN, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-7189.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 20, 2007.

John F. Cameron, of Montgomery, Alabama, argued for claimant-appellant.

Michael S. Dufault, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director, and Donald E. Kinner, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were David R. McLe-nachen, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Y. Ken Lee, Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Cathleen E. Golden appeals the final judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, which dismissed her appeal from the Board of Vet*999erans’ Appeals for lack of jurisdiction based on the failure to timely file a notice of appeal. *Golden v. Nicholson,*No. 04-1385, 2005 WL 668715 (Vet.App. Mar. 16, 2005). In so doing, the court rejected her equitable tolling argument. We *vacate*the court’s judgment and *remand*the case for reconsideration in light of *Barrett v. Nicholson,*466 F.3d 1038 (Fed.Cir.2006).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ARNOLD JAMES BEGAY,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 10315

D.C. No. 2:14

- cr

- 50101

- SRB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017 **

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Arnold James Begay appeal s from the revocation of supervised release and

the 47

- month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California

,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Begay’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 10315

grounds for relief, along with a motion to wi thdraw as counsel of record. Begay

has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appe al.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-19-0000642

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

RHEA RUIZ GALOLO, now known as RHEA RUIZ DUNN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

DENNIS CANTA GALOLO, Defendant-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(FC-D NO. 14-1-0543)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the "Proposed Stipulated

Agreement to All Matters On Appeal and to Dismiss Appeal; Order,"

filed March 23, 2020, by Plaintiff-Appellant Rhea Ruiz Dunn

(Dunn), which the court construes as a motion to dismiss the

appeal, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that:

(1) the appeal has not been docketed; (2) Dunn seeks to dismiss

the appeal based on a stipulated agreement executed by the

parties and their counsel; (3) the parties have agreed in the

stipulated agreement, inter alia, to waive any claims for

attorney's fees or costs related to this appeal; and

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000642

17-APR-2020

09:46 AM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(4) dismissal of the appeal is authorized by Hawai)i Rules of

Appellate Procedure Rule 42(a).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is

granted and the appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear

their own attorney's fees and costs.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 17, 2020.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Chief Judge

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Affinity Group Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

1.                                       The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.

 

 
| Date: May 8, 2006 |                      |
|-------------------|---------------------------|
|              |                      |
|              |                      |
|              | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe       |   |
|              | Thomas F. Wolfe           |
|              | Senior Vice President and |
|              | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or suchother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided to AffinityGroup Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group Holding, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1427.162 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF FRANK AIELLO


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

     In connection with the Periodic Report of Cal Alta Auto Glass, Inc.,(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSBA for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank
Aiello, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: December 5, 2005        By: /s/ Frank Aiello
                                                       -------------------
                                                        Frank Aiello
                                                        President
#### Herman G. Schwartz et al., Appellants, v. Public Administrator of the County of Bronx, as Administrator of the Estate of George Panoff, Deceased, Respondent.

Judgment appealed from unanimously reversed, on the law, the complaint reinstated, plaintiffs-appellants’ motion to dismiss the affirmative defense of the Statute of Limitations is granted and the defense stricken, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellants. The accident upon which this suit is predicated occurred August 27, 1961. The defendant died December 6, 1962 and the present action to recover damages for personal injuries was commenced May 21, 1965. Special Term held the action was not timely commenced by reason of the provisions of CPLR 210 (subd. [b]). This was error. CPLR 210 (subd. [b]) states “ Death of person liable. The period of eighteen months after the death, within or without the state, of a person against whom a cause of action exists is not a part of the time within which the action must be commenced against his executor or administrator.” As the language indicates the 18-month period is carved out and tolls the running of the statute. The action was timely commenced (see *McDonough*v. *Cestare,*3 A D 2d 201, mot. for lv. to app. den. 3 A D 2d 861; *New York & Boston Despatch Express Co.*v. *Carroll,*170 App. Div. 197; *Gibson*v. *Meehan,*13 Misc 2d 716, affd. 7 A D 2d 968, affd. 7 N Y 2d 93; *Hall*v. *Brennan,*140 N. Y. 409). The cases relied upon by respondent may be readily distinguished and are not here applicable. While some reference was made upon the argument to the second affirmative defense of *res judicata*we do not consider or pass upon such defense because it is not properly a part of this appeal and was not briefed or touched upon by respondent. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Eager, Tilzer, McNally and Witmer, JJ. [50 Misc 2d 200.]
#### § 1219.35 Term of office.

The members and alternate members of the Board shall serve for terms of three years, except the members of the initial Board shall serve terms as follows: Four members and four alternates shall serve for two-year terms; four members and four alternates shall serve for three-year terms; and four members and four alternates shall serve for four-year terms. No member shall serve more than two consecutive three-year terms. Members and alternates serving initial two-year or four-year terms may serve for one additional three-year term. A Board member may serve as an alternate during the years the member is ineligible for a member position. Each term of office will end on October 31, with new terms of office beginning on November 1.
#### The People of the State of New York Respondent, v Warren Joseph Knapp, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 17, 1978, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Titone, J. P., Cohalan, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### Blue Island First Securities Company et al., complainants and appellees, v. Edward J. Patterson et al., defendants, on appeal of Francis J. Sullivan, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,195.

Opinion filed May 31, 1929.

Henry P. Heizer, for appellant. Deneen, Healy & Lee, for appellees; Roy Massena, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KYLE R. HUTCHINS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 576

[ July 18, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey J. Colbath

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2007CF010381A

.

Kyle R. Hutchins, Madison, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE

, C.J., M AY and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Co-Regulation in Practice Series -- Strategies for Practitioners Who Serve Youth Aged 14-24      

# Resource: Co-Regulation in Practice Series -- Strategies for Practitioners Who Serve Youth Aged 14-24

This series contains step-by-step instructions to implement six evidence-informed and theory-based co-regulation strategies. Practitioners can intentionally layer these strategies onto pre-existing youth programs to support self-regulation without changing their current curriculum. Each strategy can be tailored to a workshop or one-on-one youth service setting and/or can be used among co-workers to foster co-regulation in the workplace. **Learn more and access the series.**
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of My Quote Zone, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
I, Eduard Tabara, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Eduard Tabara
--------------------
    Eduard Tabara
    President


Date  May 11, 2006
      ------------


<PAGE>
#### § 1220.603 Farm Service Agency.

*Farm Service Agency* also referred to as “FSA” means the Farm Service Agency of USDA.
#### § 160.78 Loss or damage of standards.

In case any duplicates become damaged or are missing, the person to whom they were loaned shall promptly inform the Administrator in writing, stating what damage or loss was sustained and how the same occurred. The cost of making necessary repairs to any duplicates, or of replacing those damaged beyond repair, or missing, shall be paid promptly by the person to whom they were originally loaned.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1435.301 Annual estimates and quarterly re-estimates. ( a ) Not later than August 1 before the beginning of the crop year, CCC will estimate, and make re-estimates as necessary but not later than the beginning of each quarter of such crop year, the: ( 1 ) Quantity of sugar that will be subject to human consumption in the United States during the crop year;
( 2 ) Quantity of sugar that will provide for reasonable carryover stocks;
( 3 ) Quantity of sugar that will be used for human consumption in the United States from carry-in stocks;
( 4 ) Quantity of sugar that will be available from domestically processed sugarcane, sugar beets, and in-process beet sugar; and
( 5 ) Quantity of sugars, syrups, and molasses that will be imported for human consumption or for the extraction of sugar for human consumption in the United States and Puerto Rico (other than sugar imported for the production of polyhydric alcohol or to be refined and re-exported in refined form or in sugar-containing products), whether such articles are included in a tariff-rate quota or not.
( b ) Calculation of all allotments, allocations, estimates, and re-estimates in this subpart will use available USDA statistics and estimates of production, consumption, and stocks, taking into account, where appropriate, data supplied in reports submitted pursuant to the reporting requirements set forth in § 1435.200.
[67 FR 54928, Aug. 26, 2002, as amended at 74 FR 15365, Apr. 6, 2009]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Integrating Effective Practices to Identify Youth Victims of Human Trafficking      

# Resource: Integrating Effective Practices to Identify Youth Victims of Human Trafficking

This fact sheet (PDF, 4 pages) provides organizations serving vulnerable youth with strategies for integrating effective approaches for conducting a human trafficking assessment. **Learn more.**
October 2, 2015

Mr. Jason Downs

3405 Howell Street

Dallas, TX 75204

Dear Mr. Downs:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2841 on July 10, 2015, 

but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4