alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |

| Dated:      December 12, 2008                                |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|  /s/      Dongliang (Frank) Su                          |   |   |   |
| Dongliang      (Frank) SuActing      Chief Financial Officer |

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ARNOLD JAMES BEGAY, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10315 

D.C. No. 2:14-cr-50101-SRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017**

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Arnold James Begay appeals from the revocation of supervised release and 

the 47-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Begay’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-10315 

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Begay 

has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Arthur F. Helf                   |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Arthur F. Helf                       |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |                                 |
|   |   | Dated : August 12, 2005         |

 

1

----
§ 1737.50 Review of completed loan application. ( a ) The completed loan application consists of: ( 1 ) A completed RUS Form 490, “Application for Telephone Loan or Loan Guarantee;”
( 2 ) A completed certification Form AD-1047, “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters—Primary Covered Transactions;”
( 3 ) A market survey called the Area Coverage Survey (ACS);
( 4 ) The plan and associated costs for the proposed construction, called the Loan Design (LD);
( 5 ) Evidence that the borrower is participating in a telecommunications modernization plan in the state where the proposed construction will occur, unless the borrower is seeking a guaranteed loan; and
( 6 ) Various supplementary information. See 7 CFR part 1737 for additional information.
( b ) RUS shall review the completed loan application, particularly noting subscriber data, grades of service, extended area service (EAS), connecting company commitments, commercial facilities, system and exchange boundaries, and proposed acquisitions. RUS shall review the LD to determine that the system design is acceptable to RUS, that the design is technically correct, that the cost estimates are reasonable, and that the design provides for area coverage service. RUS shall also review the population and incorporation status of all communities served or to be served by the borrower to determine if any nonrural areas are served and if municipal franchises are required. Any RUS lending for nonrural areas must be in accordance with 7 CFR part 1735. RUS shall also check the “List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement of Nonprocurement Programs”, compiled, maintained and distributed by General Services Administration, to determine whether the borrower is debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded (see 2 CFR 180.430).
( c ) RUS will notify the borrower if RUS recommends major changes in subscriber projections, design, cost estimates, or other significant matters. RUS will not continue loan processing until RUS and the borrower agree on all major changes.
[54 FR 13356, Apr. 3, 1989; 54 FR 16194, Apr. 21, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39396, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 66256, Dec. 20, 1993; 79 FR 76003, Dec. 19, 2014]
#### § 1752.30 Information collection and reporting requirements.

Copies of all forms and instructions referenced in this part may be obtained from RUS. Data furnished by Borrowers will be used to determine eligibility for certain servicing actions. Furnishing the data is voluntary; however, the failure to provide data could result in a servicing action being denied or the Agency taking adverse action against the Borrower to collect funds. The collection of information is vital to RUS to ensure compliance with the provisions of this part. The information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB Control Number 0572-0153.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1465.34 Offsets and assignments. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any payment or portion thereof to any participant will be made without regard to questions of Title under State law and without regard to any claim or lien against the crop, or proceeds thereof, in favor of the owner or any other creditor except agencies of the United States Government. The regulations governing offsets and withholdings found at 7 CFR part 1403 will be applicable to contract payments.
( b ) AMA participants may assign any payments in accordance with 7 CFR part 1404.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          79,827
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  432,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               516,300
<PP&E>                                       6,959,031
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,117,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,545,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          317,663
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,687,682
<COMMON>                                       649,619
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,359,044)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,545,920
<SALES>                                      1,508,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,521,350
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,250,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,691
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (143,673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (143,673)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (143,673)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (143,673)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7901
JIBRIL LUQMAN IBRAHIM, a/k/a Grant Anderson, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-95-676-R) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 29, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jibril Luqman Ibrahim, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motions for recusal and for leave to file a complaint for failing to comply with a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ibrahim v. United States , No. CA-95-676-R (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28721]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Notice of Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110-343), the Salmon-Challis 
National Forest's Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will 
conduct a business meeting which is open to the public.

DATES: Friday December 10, 2010, beginning at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Public Lands Center, 1206 South Challis Street, Salmon, 
Idaho.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics will include a discussion of 
the project approval process, evaluation of project proposals, and 
approval and recommendation of some projects for Title II funding for 
2011 and 2012.
    Some RAC members may attend the meeting by conference call, 
telephone, or electronically. The meeting is open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank V. Guzman, Forest Supervisor and 
Designated Federal Officer, at 208-756-5111.

    Dated: November 1, 2010.
Frank V. Guzman,
Forest Supervisor, Salmon-Challis National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2010-28721 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```
Petition for Exemption under section 333 of the FAA reform Act and Part 11 of aviation 

Regulations.

I, Jerry Bruce, an employee of Caesars Entertainment Services and holder of a 

Commercial Pilot Certificate hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal 

Aviation Regulation (FARs) to allow me to operate a small unmanned UAS (unmanned 

aerial system) 

The area of designated flight is the Cascata Golf Course located in Boulder City NV. 

The golf course is private property but is open to the public. Location is approximately 

1.5 miles north west of the city. 

Our intention is to video the golf course for advertisement purposes and put on our 

company website. The flights will be performed from all 18 tee boxes and flown to all 

respective greens detailing yardages, hazards and obstacles. Altitude will be from the 

surface to 100ft. Utilizing the UAV as opposed to a manned helicopter will greatly 

improve safety and costs due to the shear size and capability of the UAV which weighs 

approximately 4 pounds. A helicopters weight and rotor wash at low altitude will 

adversely effect video quality. 

The UAV in use will be a Turbo Ace Matrix with GPS, NAZA VM2 flight control system

a three axis gimball with a GoPro 3+ camera mounted on the nose and a Futaba 14sg 

Long Range radio transmitter coupled with a R7008SB 2 way receiver and telemetry 

voltage sensor. The system includes a “fail safe” and “Go Home” feature in the event of 

loss of signal. It is powered by 1, 8000mah Lithium-Polymer (LiPo) battery along with 1, 

2200mah Lithium-Polymer battery for the camera gimbal.It is constructed of a carbon 

fiber body and square aluminum tubular arms with four TA-Mat 13 balanced brushless 

motors. Flight time is approximately 26 minutes. The UAV weighs approximately 4 

pounds.

All flights will be performed during daylight operation only. There will be no players or 

spectators at the time of flights for SAFETY concerns. The only buildings on the 

property are the golf pro shop and restaurant (one building) there are no homes or other 

structures on the course. 

Obtaining an exemption for this project will mean potential increase in our business 

allowing our current and future guests to view the course before and or after they play it.

Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated.! 

Sincerely 

Jerry Bruce

PO Box 60332

Boulder City , NV. 89006
jbruce081@gmail.com
**Exhibit 4.2 Summary of Employment Arrangements between Schering AG and Dr. Karin Dorrepaal**

**Summary of Employment Arrangements between Schering Aktiengesellschaft and Dr. Karin Dorrepaal**

This summary of the material terms of the employment arrangements between Schering Aktiengesellschaft (the "Company") and Dr. Karin Dorrepaal, Member of the Executive Board of the Company, is based on the terms of certain letter agreements between the Company and Dr. Dorrepaal.

Term: Dr. Dorrepaal was elected as Member of the Executive Board of the Company as of September 1, 2004. Her current term will expire on August 31, 2007 with automatic extension for another two years unless the Supervisory Board revokes her appointment before February 28, 2007. The term of the employment arrangements described herein is concurrent with Dr. Dorrepaal’s term.

Compensation: The aggregate remuneration of Dr. Dorrepaal for 2004 is comprised of the following threeelements:

 

| Fixed Compensation:       | EUR    180,000.00                                                |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                             |
| Variable Compensation:    | EUR    415,400.00 (determined by reference to earnings per share |
|                      | (EPS) exceeding the threshold value of EUR    0.60 per share)    |
|                 |                                                             |
| Stock-Based Compensation: |                                                             |
| Stock options granted     | €    147,700.00                                             |

 

Retirement: The Company will make a monthly pension contribution equal to 3 times the monthly base salary of technical employees in group E13 applicable at the Company’s site in Bergkamen, Germany.

 

| Others          | Euro     |
|-----------------|----------|
|            |     |
| Social Security | 2,008.52 |
| Insurance (KUV) | 297.80   |
| Car             | 5,058.56 |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ART. 5 FDS FOR 1995 10-K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          59,142
<SECURITIES>                                    11,820
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    173,984
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               289,532
<PP&E>                                       1,950,779
<DEPRECIATION>                                 695,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,773,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          194,436
<BONDS>                                        604,259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       158,767
<OTHER-SE>                                     666,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,773,770
<SALES>                                        636,219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               791,564
<CGS>                                          370,617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  477,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               164,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                141,864
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,992
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            124,872
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   124,872
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
        

</TABLE>
#### R. L. Irvin & Company, appellee, v. Wadsworth V. Holmes, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,773.

Opinion filed January 6, 1930.

Tinsman & Bloeki, for appellant; Harry E. Heeren, of counsel. John William Chapman, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000792160
<NAME> ALOETTE COSMETICS, INC.
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,024,114
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,199,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (110,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,672,249
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,982,053
<PP&E>                                       5,318,289
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,056,349)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,193,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,493,854
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,450,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,193,507
<SALES>                                     11,346,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,263,983
<CGS>                                        8,021,329
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,595,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               294,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,626,115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (500,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,126,115)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,126,115)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.91)

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of IXI Mobile, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 (the “Report”), as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Lihi Segal, Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
      18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By: 
              /s/ Lihi Segal
            
            
            Dated:
              November
              13, 2007Lihi
                Segal
              Vice
                President Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
#### § 1739.8 Buy American requirement.

Awardees shall use in connection with the expenditure of grant funds only such unmanufactured articles, materials, and supplies, as have been mined or produced in the United States or in any eligible country, and only such manufactured articles, materials, and supplies as have been manufactured in the United States or in any eligible country, substantially all from articles, materials, or supplies mined, produced, or manufactured, as the case may be, in the United States or in any eligible country. For purposes of this section, an “eligible country” is any country that applies with respect to the United States an agreement ensuring reciprocal access for United States products and services and United States suppliers to the markets of that country, as determined by the United States Trade Representative. The Buy American regulations may be found at, and any requests for waiver must be submitted pursuant to, 7 CFR part 1787.

[85 FR 14408, Mar. 12, 2020]