alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Justice Department Announces $21.72 Million to Reduce Sexual and Domestic Violence on Campus, Support Children and Youth, and Engage Men and Boys as Allies      

# Justice Department Announces $21.72 Million to Reduce Sexual and Domestic Violence on Campus, Support Children and Youth, and Engage Men and Boys as Allies

The Justice Department announced this week nearly $22 million in upcoming grant awards to address and prevent sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence, and stalking on college campuses, provide services to youth victims and children exposed to such violence, and engage men and boys as allies.  

The Department awarded $10,688,200 through 36 grants under the Grants to Reduce Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence and Stalking on Campus Program (Campus). An additional $11,031,653 through 25 grants has been awarded under the Consolidated Youth and Engaging Men Grant Program (CYEM) to implement programming that encourages men and boys to be role models and change agents in their communities working toward the goal of eliminating sexual and domestic violence. **Learn more.**
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1427.12 Liens. ( a ) Waivers that fully protect the interest of CCC must be obtained before loan disbursement, notwithstanding provisions in § 1427.19(h), if there are any liens or encumbrances on the cotton tendered as collateral for a loan, even though the liens or encumbrances are satisfied from the loan proceeds, except that CCC may elect to waive such lien requirements for loans having a principal value of less than $50,000.
( b ) CCC may elect to accept cotton as loan collateral that has warehouse receiving, compression, or other charges without a lien waiver if the producer at the time of loan application agrees to reimburse CCC for any such charges that CCC may pay on behalf of the producer or that reduce the value of the cotton delivered to CCC.
[71 FR 51427, Aug. 30, 2006, as amended at 73 FR 65721, Nov. 5, 2008]
§ 1280.626 Certification and voting procedures. ( a ) Each eligible person shall be provided the opportunity to cast a ballot during the voting period announced by the Secretary. ( 1 ) Each eligible person shall be required to complete form LS-86 in its entirety, sign it, and provide evidence that they were engaged in the production, feeding, or slaughtering of lambs during the representative period. The person must legibly place his or her name and, if applicable, the entity represented, address, county, and telephone number. The person shall sign and certify on form LS-86 that: ( i ) The person was engaged in the production, feeding, or slaughtering of lambs during the representative period;
( ii ) The person voting on behalf of a corporation or other entity is authorized to do so;
( iii ) The person has cast only one vote; and
( iv ) The volume of production listed on the ballot is true and accurate.
( 2 ) Only a completed and signed form LS-86 accompanied by supporting documentation showing that the person was engaged in the production, feeding, or slaughter of lambs during the representative period shall be considered a valid vote.
( b ) To vote, eligible persons may obtain form LS-86 in-person, by mail, or by facsimile from county FSA offices or through the Internet during the voting period. A completed and signed form LS-86 and supporting documentation, such as a sales receipt or remittance form, must be returned to the appropriate county FSA office where FSA maintains and processes the person's administrative farm records. For a person not participating in FSA programs, the opportunity to vote in a referendum will be provided at the county FSA office serving the county where the person owns or rents land. A person engaged in the production, feeding, or slaughtering of lambs in more than one county will vote in the county FSA office where the person does most of his or her business. Forms obtained via the Internet will be located at *www.ams.usda.gov/lsmarketingprograms .*
( c ) A completed and signed form LS-86 and the supporting documentation may be returned in-person, by mail, or facsimile to the appropriate county FSA office. Form LS-86 and supporting documentation returned in-person or by facsimile, must be received in the appropriate county FSA office prior to the close of the work day on the final day of the voting period to be considered a valid ballot. Form LS-86 and the accompanying documentation returned by mail must be postmarked no later than midnight of the final day of the voting period and must be received in the county FSA office on the 5th business day following the final day of the voting period.
( d ) Persons who obtain form LS-86 in-person at the appropriate FSA county office may complete and return it the same day along with the supporting documentation.
[69 FR 77572, Dec. 27, 2004, as amended at 73 FR 76194, Dec. 16, 2008]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TennesseeCommerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|        | By:                     | /s/ George W. Fort |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|   | George W. Fort          |               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |               |
|   |                    |               |
|   | Dated: August 14, 2007  |               |
|        |                         |                    |        |  |

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14** 
**- 1029** 

In re: JAMES C. PLATTS ,

Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 1:13

- cv
- 00178

- IMK

- JES )

Submitted : March 27, 2014 Decided: April 1, 2014

Before MOTZ , Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

James C. Platts , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
James C. Platts filed a petition for a writ of
mandamus and an amended petition for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act. We find the
present record does not reveal undue delay in the district
court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and deny the mandamus petitions. * We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal co ntentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

* To the extent Platts requests that this court rule on his § 2241 petition in the first instance, we conclude that Platts is not entitled to such relief.
LAKANE T. BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3261

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 26, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Michael C. Overstreet, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON, and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF FEBRUARY 23 , 2016

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ------------------------------------------------------------------

WD77919 Cameron D. Williams vs. State of Missouri

WD78366 Brian Brasher vs. Troy Craig and Heather Craig

WD78585 James Joseph Mick vs. Joseph McCray and Laurie McCray

WD 78586 Consolidated w ith WD78585

WD78681 In the Interest of: G.C., D.E., M.E.; Juvenile Officer vs. M.C. (Mother); M.E. (Father)

WD78686 Consolidated with WD78681

WD78687 Consolidated with WD78681

WD78742 In the Interest of J.R.S., T.W. Biological Mother and Next Friend of J.R.S., and T.W.

vs. J.E.S.

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ---------------------------------------------------------------- --

WD 78097 State of Missouri vs. Matthew S. Ball

WD78220 State of Missouri vs. Willard F. Hunt
§ 1709.107 Eligible communities. ( a ) An eligible community under this program is one in which the average home energy costs exceed 275 percent of the national average under one or more high energy cost benchmarks established by RUS based on the latest available residential energy information from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the United States Department of Energy. RUS will update the national and high energy cost community benchmarks periodically to incorporate any changes in national home energy costs reported by EIA. RUS will publish the high energy cost community benchmark criteria in the grant announcement. Community eligibility will be determined by RUS at the time of application based on the criteria published in the applicable grant announcement.
( b ) The Application must include information demonstrating that each community in the grant's proposed target area exceeds one or more of the RUS high energy cost community benchmarks to be eligible for assistance under this program. The smallest area that may be designated as a target area is a Census block according to the most recent decennial Census of the United States (decennial Census).
( c ) The target community may include an extremely high cost to serve portion of a larger service area that does not otherwise meet the criteria, provided that the applicant can establish that the costs to serve the smaller target area exceed the benchmark.
( d ) In determining the community energy costs, applicants may include additional revenue sources that lower the rates or out of pocket consumer energy costs such as rate averaging, and other Federal, State, or private cost contributions or subsidies.
( e ) The applicant may propose a project that will serve high energy cost communities across a State or region, but where individual project beneficiaries will be selected at a later time. In such cases, to establish eligibility, the applicant must provide sufficient information in the application to determine that the proposed target area includes eligible high energy cost communities and proposed selection criteria to assure that grant funds are used to serve eligible communities.
[70 FR 5351, Feb. 2, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 9860, Feb. 24, 2015]
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2006-0164.

#### State v. Marshall.

Pickaway App. No. 05CA21, 2005-Ohio-7106. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
§ 1724.74 List of electric program standard contract forms. ( a ) *General.* The following is a list of RUS electric program standard contract forms for architectural and engineering services. Paragraph (c) of this section contains the list of required contract forms, *i.e.,* those forms of contracts that borrowers are required to use by the terms of their RUS loan agreements as implemented by the provisions of this part. Paragraph (d) of this section contains the list of guidance contract forms, *i.e.,* those forms of contracts provided as guidance to borrowers in the planning, design, and construction of their systems. All of these forms are available from RUS. See § 1724.72(b) for availability of these forms.
( b ) *Issuance date.* Where required by this part to use a standard form of contract in connection with RUS financing, the borrower shall use that form identified by issuance date in the List of Required Contract Forms in paragraph (c) of this section, as most recently published as of the date the borrower executes the contract.
( c ) *List of required contract forms.* ( 1 ) RUS Form 211, Rev. 4-04, Engineering Service Contract for the Design and Construction of a Generating Plant. This form is used for engineering services for generating plant construction.
( 2 ) RUS Form 220, Rev. 6-98, Architectural Services Contract. This form is used for architectural services for building construction.
( 3 ) RUS Form 236, Rev. 6-98, Engineering Service Contract—Electric System Design and Construction. This form is used for engineering services for distribution, transmission, substation, and communications and control facilities.
( d ) *List of guidance contract forms.* ( 1 ) RUS Form 179, Rev. 9-66, Architects and Engineers Qualifications. This form is used to document architects and engineers qualifications.
( 2 ) RUS Form 215, Rev. 5-67, Engineering Service Contract—System Planning. This form is used for engineering services for system planning.
( 3 ) RUS Form 234, Rev. 3-57, Final Statement of Engineering Fee. This form is used for the closeout of engineering services contracts.
( 4 ) RUS Form 241, Rev. 3-56, Amendment of Engineering Service Contract. This form is used for amending engineering service contracts.
( 5 ) RUS Form 244, Rev. 12-55, Engineering Service Contract—Special Services. This form is used for miscellaneous engineering services.
( 6 ) RUS Form 258, Rev. 4-58, Amendment of Engineering Service Contract—Additional Project. This form is used for amending engineering service contracts to add an additional project.
( 7 ) RUS Form 284, Rev. 4-72, Final Statement of Cost for Architectural Service. This form is used for the closeout of architectural services contracts.
( 8 ) RUS Form 297, Rev. 12-55, Engineering Service Contract—Retainer for Consultation Service. This form is used for engineering services for consultation service on a retainer basis.
( 9 ) RUS Form 459, Rev. 9-58, Engineering Service Contract—Power Study. This form is used for engineering services for power studies.
[63 FR 58285, Oct. 30, 1998, as amended at 65 FR 63196, Oct. 23, 2000; 69 FR 52595, Aug. 27, 2004]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Report of ZIM Corporation, a Canadian corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jennifer North, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jennifer North
-------------------
 Jennifer North
Chief Financial Officer
June 21, 2005
----

----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    | InterAmerican      Gaming, Inc. |                                                                      |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |                            |                                                                      |   |
| Date:       February 16, 2010 | By:                             | /s/      Gary Hokkanen                                                    |   |
|                               |                            | Name: Gary      Hokkanen                                             |   |
|                               |                            | Title:       Principal Financial OfficerChief Financial Officer |   |
|                               |                            |                                                                      |
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1410.23 Eligible practices. ( a ) Eligible practices are those CRP practices specified in the conservation plan that meet all standards needed to cost-effectively: ( 1 ) Establish permanent vegetative or water cover, including introduced or native species of grasses and legumes, trees, permanent wildlife habitat, and grassland improvements;
( 2 ) Meet other environmental benefits, as applicable, for the CRP contract period; and
( 3 ) Accomplish other purposes of CRP.
( b ) Water cover is eligible cover for purposes of paragraph (a) of this section only if approved by CCC for purposes such as the enhancement of wildlife or the improvement of water quality. Such water cover will not include ponds for the purpose of watering livestock, irrigating crops, or raising aquaculture for commercial purposes.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 219 (Monday, November 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28652]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


SES Performance Review Board

AGENCY: National Transportation Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the 
National Transportation Safety Board Performance Review Board (PRB).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Carroll, Chief, Human Resources 
Division, Office of Administration, National Transportation Safety 
Board, 490 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594-0001, (202) 314-
6233.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c)(1) through (5) of Title 5, 
United States Code requires each agency to establish, in accordance 
with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one 
or more SES Performance Review Boards. The board reviews and evaluates 
the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the 
supervisor and considers recommendations to the appointing authority 
regarding the performance of the senior executive.
    The following have been designated as members of the Performance 
Review Board of the National Transportation Safety Board:
    The Honorable Christopher A. Hart, Vice Chairman, National 
Transportation Safety Board; PRB Chair.
    The Honorable Mark R. Rosekind, Member, National Transportation 
Safety Board.
    Steven Goldberg, Chief Financial Officer, National Transportation 
Safety Board.
    Dr. John Cavolowsky, Director, Airspace Systems Program Office, 
Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate, National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration.
    Jerold Gidner, Special Counselor to the Assistant Secretary-Indian 
Affairs, Department of the Interior.
    David L. Mayer, Managing Director, National Transportation Safety 
Board.
    The Honorable Robert L. Sumwalt, III, Member, National 
Transportation Safety Board. (Alternate).
    Florence Carr, Deputy Managing Director, Federal Maritime 
Commission. (Alternate).
    Christopher W. Warner, General Counsel, U.S. Chemical Safety and 
Hazard Investigation Board. (Alternate).

    Dated: November 8, 2010.
Candi Bing,
Federal Register Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 2010-28652 Filed 11-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P