alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(April 10, 1967)

#### In the Matter of George H. Wood, an Attorney, Respondent. Bar Association of Nassau County, Inc., Petitioner

On April 4, 1966 this court referred the issues in this disciplinary proceeding against respondent to a Justice of the Supreme Court for hearing and report. The report was *939thereafter filed. On July 12, 1966 the motion to confirm the report was granted and respondent was disbarred because he had refused to testify, before the Grievance Committee of the Bar Association of Nassau County and at the hearing before the Justice upon the reference, on the basis of his constitutional privilege against self incrimination *(Matter of Cohen,*9 A D 2d 436, affd. 7 N Y 2d 488, affd. 366 U. S. 117). On November 28, 1966 respondent’s motion for reargument was granted and, on reargument, the court adhered to the original determination. On February 14, 1967 respondent’s second motion for reargument was granted to the extent of staying the orders of July 12, 1966 and November 28, 1966, by reason of the decision in *Spevack*v. *Klein*(385 U. S. 511), and remitting the matter to the same Justice of the Supreme Court for further hearings and proceedings and. for a supplemental report. On March 7, 1967 the Justice made a supplemental report. Respondent has moved to confirm the report and petitioner has moved to modify it. We are constrained to confirm the report, dismiss the proceeding and vacate the orders of July 12, 1966 and November 28, 1966 solely by reason of the determination in *Spevack*v. *Klein (supra).*Respondent’s motion granted and petitioner’s cross motion denied. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of **C-CHIP TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION** (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Stephane Solis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of October, 2004.

 
/s/ Stephane Solis 
Stephane Solis 
Chief Executive Officer
#### Drew Eberson *v.*Raymond C. Galvin

*Nicholas F. DeNigris,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

*Louis J. Mattioli,*with whom was *Harry E. Yard,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued October 5

decided October 5, 1971

The motion by the plaintiff dated July 20, 1971, to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is denied.

The motion by the plaintiff dated September 15, 1971, to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is denied.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1466.2 Administration. ( a ) *The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) funds, facilities, authorities.* Because the funds, facilities, and authorities of the CCC are available to NRCS for carrying out EQIP, each reference to NRCS in this part also refers to the CCC's funds, facilities, and authorities where applicable.
( b ) *Locally-led conservation.* ( 1 ) NRCS supports locally-led conservation by soliciting input from the State Technical Committee and the Tribal Conservation Advisory Council at the State level, and local working groups at the county, parish, or Tribal level to advise NRCS on issues relating to EQIP implementation.
( 2 ) Recommendations from the State Technical Committee and the Tribal Conservation Advisory Council may include but are not limited to: ( i ) Recommendations for program priorities and criteria;
( ii ) Identification of priority resource concerns;
( iii ) Recommendations about which conservation practices will be effective to treat identified priority resource concerns; and
( iv ) Recommendations of program payment rates for payment schedules.
( c ) *Delegations.* No delegation in the administration of this part to lower organizational levels will preclude the Chief from making any determinations under this part, redelegating to other organizational levels, or from reversing or modifying any determination made under this part.
( d ) *Waiver.* The Chief may modify or waive a nonstatutory, discretionary provision of this part if the Chief determines the application of that provision to a particular limited situation to be inappropriate and inconsistent with the purposes of the program;
( e ) *Scope of agreement authority.* NRCS may enter into agreements with other Federal or State agencies, Indian Tribes, conservation districts, units of local government, public or private organizations, acequias, and individuals to assist NRCS with implementation of the program in this part.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7180

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RODERICK LAMAR WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Richard L. Voorhees , Senior District Judge. ( 5:03

- cr - 00004

- RLV

- DSC

- 8; 5:16

- cv - 00132

- RLV )

Submitted : November 21 , 2017 Decided: November 28, 2017

Before WYNN and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Roderick Lamar Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bind ing precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Roderick Lamar Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appe alability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a pri soner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or
wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S.
322 , 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Sl ack , 529 U.S.
at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the fac ts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 1718.52 Existing mortgages.

Nothing contained in this subpart amends, invalidates, terminates or rescinds any existing mortgage entered into between the borrower and RUS and any other mortgagees.
(1$.



## Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Ffo;l r ^trr 1{I rSiiT1 1.` iii > i:^ -^1:1.'d?^,,`•^(^"^' - ..l L::=,..'^_ .s =r^:.^^ _ ''' _ I 

# #4

Search Help w: More Search Options a:

Abrut.SLan,iards I .suns & Regulatirrrs Hnfnrrrratiorn Resnuices N"dires £; Rules Priority Setting

PuiGllc Workshops axHaan nqs Useful Links rnmmerc al Prnductx 

## Schedule Setting for the 2006 Appliance Standards Rulemaking Process The Department of Energy (DOE) Building Technologies Program will hold a public meeting November 15, 2005, in Washington, DC, to discuss appliance standards scheduling issues. The Department is interested in receiving comments on the Department's desire to bring all appliance rulemaking activities into compliance with the applicable statutory requirements. The Department will finalize its standards scheduling plan after consideration of comments received during and following the public meeting. Input from this meeting and written comments will be helpful in establishing the approach to be used in scheduling rulemaking activities that address the new Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005), Pub. L. Residential Products No. 109-58, signed into law August 8, 2005, and other rulemakings still required by the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), as amended by EPACT 2005. Further information for the meeting is shown below. Analytical updates or revisions to last year's data sheets and spreadsheets are specified as 2006 analyses where appropriate. Some of the following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Da±-+ nl7acjAdob ^ Reader. These files require the latest version of Adobe Reader (6.0 or higher ) to view them

. If you do not have this software version , click the Download Adobe Reader link above to acquire this software 

### 2006 Schedule Setting Documents • The Federal Register Notice published on October 24, 2005, contains more details about the public meeting and how to provide comments (PDF 49 K8). DOE Appliances & Commercial Equipment Standards ProgramRulemaking Activities contains a list of rulemakings with any specified statutory cycle deadlines (PD F 16.3 KB). • 2006 Draft Rulemaking Activities Data Sheets contain last year's data sheets with some 2006 updates

. Revised data sheets are labeled "revised for 2006 " (PDF 52711,B). • 2006 Rulemaking Spreadsheets contains Excel spreadsheets for 17 products, including two new spreadsheets for commercial refrigeration , and ceiling fans and ceiling fan light kits. This spreadsheet contains calculations for potential energy savings (ZIP_531 6{5).
• DRAFT TECHNICAL REPORT: Analysis of Amended Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Refrigerator

- Freezers, October, 2005

. This additional analysis was prepared in response to a petition by stakeholders to amend the standards (PDF .1 MS).

# #4

t'J E ot;_rCP 5_5 i,rrrrv '. _L''i a1' Eulidinu T hncIogies. rq.gram Home 'ERE Hume U.S. Department of Energy Content Last Updated: 10 / 26/2005
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09370**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 09370\09370_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09370\09370_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09370\09370_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09370\09370_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09370\09370_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09370\09370_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09370\09370_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09370\09370_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09370\09370_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09370\Certification Statement Plant ID 09370.pdf Plant certification statement 09370\Supplemental Documents\09370_cover letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 09370\Supplemental Documents\09370_MAP-1 Newington_Facility_Diagram (34x22).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 09370\Supplemental Documents\09370_NEWINGTON FLY ASH BLOCK DIAGRAM (11x17).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x x 09370\Supplemental Documents\09370_WB-1 NEWINGTON WATER BALANCE BLOCK DIAGRAM (11x17).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### § 1205.30 Instructions and forms.

The Administrator is hereby authorized to prescribe additional instructions and forms consistent with the provisions of this subpart to govern conduct of the sign-up period.
§ 1775.33 Objectives. The objectives of the program are to: ( a ) Identify and evaluate solutions to water and waste problems in rural areas.
( b ) Assist applicants in preparing applications for water and waste disposal loans/grants.
( c ) Assist associations in improving operation and maintenance of existing water and waste facilities in rural areas.
#### § 1710.504 Additional requirements.

Additional requirements for insured electric loans are set forth in 7 CFR part 1714.

[60 FR 3731, Jan. 19, 1995. Redesignated at 78 FR 73366, Dec. 5, 2013]
#### In the Matter of Robert M. Sparago, an Attorney and Counselor at Law, Respondent. Joint Bar Association Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner.

— Application by petitioner, pursuant to statute (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd 4) to have respondent’s name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law upon the ground that he has ceased to be an attorney by virtue of having been convicted of a felony. On November 13, 1978, Robert M. Sparago (who was admitted to practice in this court on December 17, 1952 under the name Robert Morris Sparago) was convicted on his plea of guilty, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, of conspiracy to defraud the United States (US Code, tit 18, § 371), a felony. Accordingly, by virtue of subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, Robert M. Sparago has ceased to be an attorney and counselor at law or competent to practice law as such. Application granted, an order will be entered directing that the respondent’s name be forthwith struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Homeless: youth      

# Homeless: youth

Office of Elementary and Secondary Education's Dear Colleague Letter on Education for Highly Mobile Children

Office of Special Education Programs' Dear Colleague Letter on Education for Highly Mobile Children

Supporting the Education of Unaccompanied Homeless Students

Health Coverage for Homeless and At-Risk Youth

Bright Idea: Everything You Need to Know About Helping Homeless Youth Apply for Medicaid

Family Unification Program (FUP)

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Resources for Homeless Youth

Continuum of Care (CoC) Program

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Grant Programs Relevant for Homeless Families

Family and Youth Services Bureau Fact Sheet

  Subscribe to Homeless: youth
Member of the California Society of Certified Public0
Accountants

Registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board

August 18, 2008


To Whom It May Concern:

The firm of Chang G. Park, CPA consents to the inclusion of
our report of August 8, 2008 on the reviewed condensed
consolidated financial statements of Cal Alta Auto Glass,
Inc. and Subsidiary as of June 30, 2008 in any filings that
are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S. Securities
andExchange Commission.


Very truly yours,
/s/ Chang G. Park
____________________________
Chang G. Park, CPA
Chang G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.

 2667 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH PLAZA B  SAN DIEGO
 CALIFORNIA 92108-3707

 TELEPHONE (858)722-5953  FAX (858) 761-0341
 FAX (858) 764-5480

 E-MAIL changgpark@gmail.com
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Rule 13a-14 Certification 

 

I, Jon L. Kranov, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ottawa Savings Bancorp, Inc., 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: June 30, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

TELETRACKING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

FRANK J. GORI, MARK JULIANO, GENE 

NACEY, LORRAINE NACEY, STEPHEN 

P. NASH, BRIAN E. SCHULIGER, 

INSIGHT VENTURE MANAGEMENT, 

L.L.C. AND INSIGHT TTT, LLC., 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 355 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BIANCA MARIE RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2937

[June 7, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Elizabeth A. Scherer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

19013042CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Robert Porter, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lindsay A. Warner, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Guzman v. State, 350 So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 1212.44 Procedure. ( a ) A majority of the Board members will constitute a quorum so long as at least one of the members present is an importer member and one of the members present is a first handler member. An alternate will be counted for the purpose of determining a quorum only if a member from his or her membership class is absent or disqualified from participating. Any Board action will require the concurring votes of a majority of those present and voting; with the exception of the two-thirds vote requirement in § 1212.52(f). All votes at meetings will be cast in person. The Board must give timely notice of all Board and committee meetings to members and alternates.
( b ) The Board may take action by any means of communication when, in the opinion of the Board chairperson, an emergency requires that action must be taken before a meeting can be called. Any action taken under this procedure is valid only if: ( 1 ) All members and the Secretary are notified and the members are provided the opportunity to vote;
( 2 ) Each proposition is explained accurately, fully, and substantially identically to each member;
( 3 ) With the exception of the two-thirds vote requirement in § 1212.52(f), a majority of the members vote in favor of the action; and
( 4 ) All votes are promptly confirmed in writing and recorded in the Board minutes.