alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Mark Tripp, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Easton-Bell Sports, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:August 14, 2007 /s/ Mark Tripp Mark Tripp    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)  
39
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCorrelation of Puma airloads: Lifting-line and wake calculationA cooperative program undertaken by organizations in the United States, England, France, and Australia has assessed the strengths and weaknesses of four lifting-line/wake methods and three CFD methods by comparing their predictions with the data obtained in flight trials of a research Puma. The Puma was tested in two configurations: a mixed bladed rotor with instrumented rectangular tip blades, and a configuration with four identical swept tip blades. The results are examined of the lifting-line predictions. The better lifting-line methods show good agreement with lift at the blade tip for the configuration with four swept tips; the moment is well predicted at 0.92 R, but deteriorates outboard. The predictions for the mixed bladed rotor configuration range from fair to good. The lift prediction is better for the swept tip blade than for the rectangular tip blade, but the reasons for this cannot be determined because of the unmodeled effects of the mixed bladed rotor.Document ID19900004011Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBousman, William G.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Young, Colin*(Royal Aerospace Establishment Farnborough (England)., United States)*Gilbert, Neil*(Aeronautical Research Labs. Melbourne (Australia)., United States)*Toulmay, Francois*(Aerospatiale Marignane (France)., United States)*Johnson, Wayne*(Johnson Aeronautics Palo Alto, CA., United States)*Riley, M. J.*(Royal Aerospace Establishment Bedford, United Kingdom)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1989Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberA-89209NASA-TM-102212USAAVSCOM-TR-89-A-006NAS 1.15:102212AD-A215494Meeting InformationMeeting: European Rotorcraft ForumLocation: AmsterdamCountry: NetherlandsStart Date: September 12, 1989End Date: September 15, 1989Accession Number90N13327Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 992-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004011.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1430.411 Calculation of average feed cost and actual dairy production margins. ( a ) Payments are made to a participating dairy operation as specified in this subpart only when the calculated average actual dairy production margin for a month is below the coverage level in effect for the participating dairy operation. That margin will be calculated on a national basis and is the amount by which for the relevant month, the all milk price exceeds the average feed cost for dairy producers. The average actual dairy production margin calculation applies to all participating dairy operations. The calculations are not made on an operation by operation basis or on their marketings.
( b ) For calculating the national average feed cost that dairy operations use to produce a cwt of milk, the following three items will be added together: ( 1 ) The product determined by multiplying 1.0728 by the price of corn per bushel;
( 2 ) The product determined by multiplying 0.00735 by the price of soybean meal per ton; and
( 3 ) The product determined by multiplying 0.0137 by the price of alfalfa hay per ton.
( c ) To make those feed calculations, the Deputy Administrator on behalf of CCC will use the following full month data: ( 1 ) For corn, the full month price received by farmers during the month in the United States as reported in the monthly Agricultural Prices report by USDA NASS;
( 2 ) For soybean meal, the Central Illinois soybean meal price delivered by rail as reported in the USDA AMS Market News-Monthly; and
( 3 ) For alfalfa hay, the full month price received during the month by farmers in the United States for high quality (premium and supreme) alfalfa hay as reported in the monthly Agricultural Prices report by USDA NASS will be used to calculate the hay price.
( d ) The national average feed cost data for corn, soybean meal, and alfalfa hay used in the calculation of the national average feed cost to determine the actual dairy production margin for the relevant period, will be the data reported in the publication the following month. (For example, full month May prices will be available in the June publication, and those will be the prices used).
( e ) The actual dairy production margin for each month, will be calculated by subtracting: ( 1 ) The average feed cost for that month, determined under paragraph (b) of this section; from
( 2 ) The all-milk price for that same month.
[84 FR 28176, June 18, 2019, as amended at 86 FR 70708, Dec. 13, 2021]
#### The Bank of the Commonwealth *vs.*Swindler *et al.*

Pet. & Susíf

The charter of the Bank of the Com'th is not unconstitutional. *Lampton*vs. *Bank of the Com’th, 2 Litt. 301; Brisco &c.*vs. *Same, 7 J. J. Mar.*349.

This court- will not, in general, change the date of a decision, or make any order, to aid a party in prosecuting a writ of error, in a case where the S. C. of the U. States has jurist diction.

[Mr. Crittenden for the Bank: no appearance for Defendants-^

From the Circuit Court for Mercer County.

*November*6.

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Unless the charter of the Bank of the Commonwealth of Kentucky be unconstitutional, neither of the pleas, pleaded in this case, contains matter sufficient to sustain the judgment of the circuit court, in bar of the action.

Having hitherto decided, that the charter of the said Bank is legal and valid, and not being inclined to retract that decision, this court cannot sustain the judgment of the circuit court.

Wherefore, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to sustain the de murrers to the pleas.

This case and about twenty others, from the same circuit, immediately following upon the docket, were actions brought by the Bank, upon notes discounted : to which the defendants pleaded in substance, that the act of Assembly establishing the Bank, was in violation of the. constitut.ion of the United States, and void, and the. suit., therefore, being in the name of a corporation that had no legal existence, could not be maintained. The cases were ^11 decided here, on the 6th of November. On the 17th, Mr. Haggin, as counsel forthe defendants in some of the cases, moved to change the date of the judgments : in other words, to set aside the judgments which had been rendered on the 6th of November, and enter new ones, in lieu of them, under date of the 17th; slating, that his clients intended to prosecute writs of error to the Supreme Court of the United States, snd desired to obtain the order of a Judge of that court, for a supersedeas in each case ; which, under the act of Congress, could be awarded, but within ten days after the rendition of the final judgment of this court. The practice of the Federal tribunals, he observed, afforded numerous precedents of motions of this character and object, being allowed. But this court, upon consideration, overruled the motion ; the Chief Justice remarking, that the court would not, in general, he inclined to encourage proceedings intended to supersede and revise its own judgments or decrees; and they saw nothing in these cases, to entitle them to any peculiar favor.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|   | By:                       | /s/  George W. Fort |   |
|--------|---------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   | George  W. Fort           |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer  |
|   |                      |                |
|   | Dated:  November 14, 2007 |                |
|        |                           |                     |        |  |

 

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Stories from the Field: The White Earth Nation      

# Resource: Stories from the Field: The White Earth Nation

This article discusses how a Minnesota Tribe used a multifaceted approach to successfully respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Their approach included culturally and linguistically appropriate messaging and other health literacy best practices.**Learn more.**
2006-0407.

#### State ex rel. Verizon Wireless v. Villanueva.

In Prohibition. On respondent’s motion to dismiss and motions for leave to intervene and to dismiss of Cindy Satterfield, Highland Speech Service, Inc., and Intermessage Communications. Motion for leave to intervene granted. Motions to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Lundberg Stratton, J., would deny the motions to dismiss and grant an alternative writ.

Resnick and O’Donnell, JJ., not participating.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0641 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. THOMAS JERRY HILL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 27 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 26 2024

08/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0641
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2024-07-02T14:21:03-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.’s 333-134291,333-104011, 333-84312,333-57244, 333-34312, 333-39627 on Form S-8 of our report dated December 29, 2006,relating to the financial statements of Datawatch Corporation, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofDatawatch Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2006.
| */s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP* | * * |
|---------------------------------|----------|

 

Boston,Massachusetts

December 29, 2006

1

----
----

----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |

| Dated:      November 3, 2008                                                                                 |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|  /s/      Dongliang Su                                                                                  |   |   |   |
| Dongliang      SuActing      Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer and AccountingOfficer) |

----
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1427.21 Settlement. ( a ) The settlement of cotton loans will be made by CCC on the basis of the quality and quantity of the cotton delivered to CCC by the producer or acquired by CCC subject to the producer being responsible for, if applicable, warehouse receiving charges, new bale ties, unpaid warehouse compression, charges for and related to the certification of a bale and for any subsequent exchange of certificated receipts, storage charges for any period of yard storage, and storage charges in excess of any maximum storage credit rates as determined and announced by CCC.
( b ) For purposes of settlements for cotton delivered to CCC in satisfaction of a loan obligation, CCC may elect to calculate such settlement values based on the net weight, condition, and classification as reflected on the warehouse receipt delivered to CCC, whether such receipt is the receipt issued by the original storing warehouse and presented for calculating the loan amount or a receipt issued by a subsequent warehouse due to the transfer of such bale while pledged as collateral for a CCC loan.
( c ) If a producer does not pay CCC the amount due under a loan, CCC will take title to the cotton as provided in § 1427.7(b).
( d ) With respect to ELS cotton which is stored as provided in § 1427.10(f), settlement of loans will be made based upon the determination of the quantity and quality made by CCC at the time of acceptance of the cotton by CCC at the warehouse designated by CCC as provided in § 1427.18(k).
( e ) If CCC sells the commodity described in paragraph (a) of this section in settlement of the recourse loan, the sales proceeds will be applied to the amount owed CCC by the producer. The producer is responsible for any costs incurred by CCC in completing the sale and CCC will deduct the amount of these costs from the sales proceeds. When CCC sells any cotton obtained by forfeiture under a MAL, CCC will, in all instances, retain all proceeds obtained from the sale of the cotton and will not make any payment of any amount of such proceeds to any party, including the producer who had satisfied their obligation under the loan through forfeiture of the cotton to CCC.
( f ) CCC will pay to the warehouse any unpaid storage or receiving charges for forfeited loan collateral, not to exceed the amount that accrued from the date that all necessary documents were received by CCC to the loan maturity date, as soon as practicable after the cotton is forfeited.
[67 FR 64459, Oct. 18, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 49329, Aug. 18, 2003; 71 FR 32427, June 6, 2006; 73 FR 65721, Nov. 5, 2008; 80 FR 135, 139, Jan. 2, 2015]
Exhibit 10.48


 


THIRD AMENDMENT TO EXCLUSIVE LICENSE
AGREEMENT


 


UC Agreement Control No. 2006-04-0026


 


This third amendment ("Third Amendment")
to the Exclusive License Agreement ("Agreement"), effective August 29, 2007 is made by and between The Regents of the
University of California, a California corporation ("The Regents"), and Putney Drug Corp, a Delaware company ("Licensee").


 


BACKGROUND


 





	 	A. 	The Regents and Licensee are parties to the Agreement, dated as of July II, 2005. 
	 	B. 	The Agreement was amended on November
8, 2005 ("First Amendment") and on January 3, 2007 ("Second Amendment");


 


The parties agree as follows:


 


I. Amend Paragraph I.l ("Regents'
Patent Rights") to include UC Case No. 2007


 


561.


 


2. In consideration for adding
UC Case No. 2007-561 to the Agreement, a milestone payment in the new Paragraph 4.5, which reads as follows, is added to the Agreement:


 


4.5 Licensee will pay The Regents,
in either cash or publicly traded equity, twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) upon issuance of the first US patent claiming priority
to the provisional filing (SN 60/933,030).


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this Third Amendment to the Agreement by their duly authorized representatives for good and valuable consideration.


 





	PUTNEY DRUG CORP. 	THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
	 	 
	By: /s/ Steve Kanzer            	By: /s/ Emily Waldron Loughran             
	Name: Steve Kanzer	Name: Emily Waldron Loughran
	Title: President 	Title: Director of Licensing
	 	 
	Dated: August 30, 2007	Dated: September 4, 2007
#### § 1710.4 Exception authority.

Consistent with the RE Act and other applicable laws, the Administrator may waive or reduce any requirement imposed by this part or other RUS regulations on an electric borrower, or a lender whose loan is guaranteed by RUS, if the Administrator determines that imposition of the requirement would adversely affect the Government's financial interest.
# Case studies

- Home Visiting for Women Experiencing Homelessness: A Look at Efforts in Boston and New York City Maternal and Infant Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) Technical Assistance Coordinating Center (TACC)                  These case studies demonstrate how home visiting efforts can provide critical services that support maternal and infant health outcomes and family stability among women experiencing homelessness.            Topic                        Early childhood development          Evidence-based programs or promising practices          Federal programs          Homeless: pregnant and parenting youth                          Audience                        Service providers                          Type of Resource                        Case studies                                http://www.design-consultants.com/Clients/birthtothree/miechv.april/april.2014...