alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                the Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                   |  /s/              Richard              Rappaport |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard                RappaportPresident                (Principal Executive Officer) |

|                          |                                                                                                       |  /s/              Anthony              C. Pintsopoulos |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Anthony                C. PintsopoulosChief                Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|                          |                                                                                                       |
| August                6, 2007 |                                                                                                            |

----
§ 1499.17 Opportunities to object and appeals. ( a ) CCC will provide an opportunity to a recipient to object to, and provide information and documentation challenging, any action taken by CCC pursuant to § 1499.15. CCC will comply with any requirements for hearings, appeals, or other administrative proceedings to which the recipient is entitled under any other statute or regulation applicable to the action involved. For example, if the action taken by CCC pursuant to § 1499.15 is to initiate suspension or debarment proceedings as authorized under 2 CFR parts 180 and 417, then the requirements in 2 CFR parts 180 and 417 will apply instead of the requirements in this section. In the absence of other applicable statutory or regulatory requirements, the requirements set forth in this section will apply.
( b ) The recipient must submit its objection in writing, along with any documentation, to the official specified in the agreement within 30 days after the date of CCC's written notification to the recipient of the CCC action being challenged. This official will endeavor to notify the recipient of his or her determination (the initial determination) within 60 days after the date that CCC received the recipient's written objection.
( c ) The recipient may appeal the initial determination to the Administrator, FAS. An appeal must be in writing and be submitted to the Office of the Administrator within 30 days after the date of the initial determination. The recipient may submit additional documentation with its appeal.
( d ) The Administrator will base the determination on appeal upon information contained in the administrative record and will endeavor to make a determination within 60 days after the date that CCC received the appeal. The determination of the Administrator will be the final determination of CCC. The recipient must exhaust all administrative remedies contained in this section before pursuing judicial review of a determination by the Administrator.
[81 FR 62605, Sept. 12, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 45060, Aug. 28, 2019]
SCWC

- 19

- 0000278

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

________________________________________________________________

SAMUEL B. SNIFFIN and SETH E. CONKLIN,

Petitioners/Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Respondent/Defendant/Third

- Party Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

MATTHEW MAZZOCCA,

Respondent/Third

- Party Defendant

- Appellee.

(CIV. NO. 1CC131002943)

------------------------ ------------------------------------

SAMUEL B. SNIFFIN and SETH E. CONKLIN,

Petitioners/Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

vs.

MATTHEW MAZZOCCA,

Respondent/Defendant

- Appellee.

(CIV. NO. 1CC141001193)

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 19

- 0000278) Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-19-0000278

15-NOV-2023

12:38 PM

Dkt. 12 ODAC2 ORDE R REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna and Eddins, JJ., and Circuit

Judges DeWeese and Drewyer, assigned by reason of vacancies)

Petitioner s Samuel B. Sniffin and Seth E. Conklin’s

Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on October 2, 2023, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, November 15 , 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Wendy M. DeWeese

/s/ Michelle L. Drewyer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0352 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. GARREN DOUGLAS SEAL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 1 3, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 2 2023

02/02/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0352
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICERS
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Eugene M. CarrEugene M. CarrChairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)November 6, 2008/s/ David J. KosofskyDavid J. KosofskyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)November 6, 2008
#### § 1709.15 Grant closeout.

Grant closeout is when all required work is completed, administrative actions relating to the completion of work and expenditure of funds have been accomplished, the final project report has been submitted and found acceptable by RUS and RUS accepts final expenditure information. No monitoring action by RUS of the grantee is required after grant closeout. However, grantees remain responsible in accordance with the terms of the grant agreement for compliance with conditions on property acquired or derived through grant funds.
#### § 1753.77 Methods of minor construction.

Minor construction may be performed by contract using RUS Contract Form 773, “Miscellaneous Construction Work and Maintenance Services”, by RUS Contract Form 515, or by work order construction. The rules for using Form 515 for minor construction are contained in subpart F of this part.

[64 FR 16612, Apr. 6, 1999]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Castle Arch Real Estate Investment Company, L.L.C. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, Kirby D. Cochran hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



a.

the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



b.

the information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Kirby D. Cochran

Kirby D. Cochran, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

August 15, 2005
#### Tormod Langemyr, Doing Business as Tom Carpentry Construction Company, Appellant, v. Patrick J. Campbell, as President of Local Union 964, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, Respondent. In the Matter of the Arbitration between Local Union No. 964, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, Respondent, and Tormod Langemyr, Doing Business as Tom Carpentry Construction Company, Appellant.

Two orders of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County, dated October 26, 1966 and October 31, 1966, respectively, the first dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action and the second confirming an arbitration award, affirmed, with one bill of costs. A respondent in an arbitration proceeding (here the appellant) who is under indictment with respect to the same subject matter as is involved in the proceeding is not entitled as a matter *943of constitutional right under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States to an adjournment of the proceeding until the indictment is dismissed and until there is no possibility of another indictment. In this case, appellant suffered no penalty by reason of the denial of an adjournment. To the contrary, he was allowed to and did invoke the Fifth Amendment at the arbitration hearing, and thus compelled petitioner to make out its case with independent proof and without the assistance of appellant’s books and oral testimony. *Spevack*v. *Klein*(385 U. S. 511), wherein the penalty was disbarment, and *Garrity*v. *New Jersey*(385 U. S. 493), wherein the penalty was forfeiture of a position as police officer and a pension, do not apply to this case. The situation here is analogous to those in *Heit & Weisenthal*v. *Licht*(218 App. Div. 753) and *Tobias*v. *North Amer. Importing Co.*(133 Misc. 474, affd. 225 App. Div. 699), wherein the plaintiffs were granted pretrial examinations of the defendants despite the claim that such examinations might result in the defendants being compelled to incriminate themselves. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerJuly
      29, 2009
#### §§ 1710.414-1710.499 [Reserved]
#### § 1405.2 Basic rule of fractions.

Fractions shall be rounded in accordance with the provisions of 7 CFR part 718.
#### In the Matter of Anna E. Gassner, Appellant, v. Board of Examiners of the City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 16, 1966, reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to Special Term for a hearing to determine the objectivity of the standards contained in the rating schedule applied in measuring petitioner’s relative training and experience. No questions' of fact were considered. Petitioner’s qualifications must be rated by objective standards (Matter *of Fink*v. *Finegan,*270 N. Y. 356). The requirement of objectivity is not meaningful in this case unless the rating schedule employed is open to review by the courts. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur. [51 Misc 2d 467.]
Presidential Documents

69569 

Federal Register 

Vol. 75, No. 218 

Friday, November 12, 2010 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of November 10, 2010 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect To 

Iran 

On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to Iran, pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), to deal with the 

unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, 

and economy of the United States constituted by the situation in Iran. 

Because our relations with Iran have not yet returned to normal, and the 

process of implementing the January 19, 1981, agreements with Iran is 

still underway, the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, 

must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2010. Therefore, consistent 

with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), 

I am continuing for 1 year this national emergency with respect to Iran. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

November 10, 2010. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28780 

Filed 11–10–10; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES6OB#1.EPS</GPH>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1348 

To extend the prohibition on the joint use of Homestead Air Reserve Base, 

Homestead, Florida, by the Air Force and civil aircraft. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2023 

Mr. GIMENEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To extend the prohibition on the joint use of Homestead 

Air Reserve Base, Homestead, Florida, by the Air Force 

and civil aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Options for 

5 Everglades Restoration and National Defense in the 

6 Straits of Florida Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON JOINT USE OF HOMESTEAD AIR 

8 RESERVE BASE WITH CIVIL AVIATION. 

9 Section 2874 of the James M. Inhofe National De10 fense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023 (Public Law 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1348 IH

1 117–263) is amended by striking ‘‘On or before Sep2 tember 30, 2026, the Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘The Sec3 retary’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Cardona, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered May 24, 1978, convicting defendant of rape in the first degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term not exceeding six years, unanimously modified, on the law, to reduce the judgment of conviction to rape in the second degree and the matter remanded for resentence. As the People concede, the facts admitted by defendant on the plea allocution do not support a conviction of rape in the first degree, but, instead, of rape in the second degree, in that being 18 years or more, he engaged in sexual intercourse with a female less than 14 years of age (Penal Law, § 130.30). Modification, to which the People consent and indeed, which they urge, is therefore appropriate to conform the conviction to the crime to which defendant pleaded. (See *People v Waddell,*66 AD2d 807.) A remand is *521necessary, however, for resentence. Concur—Birns, J. P., Sullivan, Silver-man, Lynch and Carro, JJ. 9 Florinda B. Tome et al., Plaintiffs, v Jorge Buitrago et al., Defen-
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices 69971 

[FR Doc. 2010–28765 Filed 11–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 10–58] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

following is a copy of a letter to the 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Transmittals 10–58 with attached 

transmittal, policy justification, and 

Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: November 9, 2010. 

Morgan F. Park, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN16NO10.066</GPH>
69972 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN16NO10.027</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices 69973 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN16NO10.028</GPH>
69974 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 2010–28772 Filed 11–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN16NO10.029</GPH> EN16NO10.030</GPH>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           2012 School Health Profiles      

# 2012 School Health Profiles

The newly released 2012 School Health Profiles include information gathered through surveys conducted in 45 states, 16 large urban school districts, four territories, and two tribal governments on multiple measures related to school health. The report includes background information on the Profiles, a fact sheet on key 2012 results, and a fact sheet on each state, school district, territory, and tribal government on obesity, sexual risk behaviors, and tobacco use. Learn more.
§ 1493.490 Proof of entry. ( a ) *Diversion.* The diversion of commodities covered by a SCGP payment guarantee to a country other than that shown on the payment guarantee is prohibited, unless expressly authorized by the GSM.
( b ) *Records of proof of entry.* Exporters must obtain and maintain records of an official or customary commercial nature and grant authorized USDA officials access to such documents or records as may be necessary to demonstrate the arrival of the agricultural commodities exported in connection with the SCGP in the country that was the intended country of destination of such commodities. Records demonstrating proof of entry must be in English or be accompanied by a certified or other translation acceptable to CCC. Records acceptable to meet this requirement include an original certification of entry signed by a duly authorized customs or port official of the importing country, by the importer, by an agent or representative of the vessel or shipline which delivered the agricultural commodity to the importing country, or by a private surveyor in the importing country, or other documentation deemed acceptable by the GSM showing: ( 1 ) That the agricultural commodity entered the importing country;
( 2 ) The identification of the export carrier;
( 3 ) The quantity of the agricultural commodity;
( 4 ) The kind, type, grade and/or class of the agricultural commodity; and
( 5 ) The date(s) and place(s) of unloading of the agricultural commodity in the importing country. (Records of proof of entry need not be submitted with a claim for loss, except as may be provided in § 1493.500(b)(4)(ii).)
#### §§ 1770.18-1770.24 [Reserved]
#### § 160.94 Spirits of turpentine for medicinal use.

Spirits of turpentine so packed, described, labeled, or sold as to indicate that it is offered as a medicament shall nevertheless be subject to the requirements of the Naval Stores Act and of the provisions in this part, as well as any requirements under any other statute.
#### *Keith vs. Gore.*

Chancery.

Case 5.

Error to the Montgomery Circuit; Silas W. Robbins, Judge. ■

*Parties. Arbitration. Rescisión.*

January 22.

Statement of the case.

“Theyarii'e.!” in orders of court, only embraces persons before the court.

The person responsible for title may with obligee submit the question of *9specific execution or rescisión not- ' withstanding intermediate assignors.

*8Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Benjamin Gore, in his bill filed in the Montgomery circuit court, against Gabriel Keith and others, charged, that he held by purchase, for a valuable consideration, a bond on Keith for the conveyance to him, of a tract of land in Montgomery county, and prayed either a specific execution, or a rescisión and repayment of the consideration.

As the equity had passed from the first vendor through several intermediate purchasers, before .it vested in Keith,, all those purchasers and vendors were made defendants; on some of whom, process was not executed; but it having been returned executed on Keith, he answered. In this state of case, “the parlies” (in the language *of.*the record) *submitted*the matters in controversy to arbitration, and the arbitrators having returned an award directing the’ contract to be rescinded, and allowing to'Gore $278 24 cents tobe paid by Keith, the court decreed accordingly.

We are unable to perceive any error in this decree. The submission by “the parties” means only those who were before the court by service of process. It was not essential that process should have been served on all who were prayed to be made defendants, before Keith and others defendants, could refer the case. For the purpose of rescinding or executing the contract, Keith alone might make with the complainant a valid submission to arbitration. He alone was responsible for the consideration money, and for title to Gore._ The *9.others were included in the bill, only to aid in perfecting and quieting title. They make no objection to the decree, and it is not competent for Keith to object to it for want of parties. The appearance of the other defendants was not necessary for his defence or security, and he is bound by the award.

*Triplett*for plaintiff; defendants. *Crittenden*and *Hanson*for

The decree is therefore affirmed with costs.