alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# airTran.

... I II W ... v s

August 19,2010 

## u.s Department of Transportation Docket Management System 400 

### t h Street, SW , Room PL-400 Washington, D .C. 20591 - 0001 Re. Use of ATA Exem p t ion 5318 

### Dear Sir or Madam: AirTran Airways respectfully requests your consideration in addressing the following concem. AirT ran currently has been authorized to exercise exemptio n number 8802 A, FAR 91.203 (a) and (b), which allows for temporary aircraft operation without airworthiness and registration certi ficates. Air Transport Association (ATA) is currently utili z in g exemption 53 J 8 

### J to address the same exemption. As a member of ATA , AirTran has 

### previously revised its ADOS 

### Operations Specifications to reflect the exemption number and date of expiration posted on the ATA website for matching exempt ion numbers. Since AirTran alre ad y has authorization for the FAR 91 . 203 exemption , can A irTran revise its Operation s Specifications to reflect ATA exemption number 5318 and th e associated date ofexpi ration? 

## r have posed thi s q ue s tion to our Certificate Management Office and was a s ked to c o ntact yo ur office for an official response. Your timely response is most appreciated . (fyou have an y ques tio ns , or need further inf o nll ali o n , p lease feel free to co niaci me al (678) 254-6502 . This letter lind**cncJo~ur es**  ( oll'aiu contklcnlial commercial in f ormat i on. AccordillglY.lhey a r e eumpl from public di s dosun· und ..r the provisions of the . "recdom of In formal ion Ac tioo (FOIA). 5 l l

_ ".C. sec ti u n s 552 et SC'j. and $ec t ion 7 . 69 of the regula ti ons of the Department ofTr.l nsportation. 49 CfR 7.69. Sincerely .



### Jeff dowanic Director. Qualit y T

e clmirol Operatio ns Ce ut er flartsjieldjac/eson Atlanta /ntemtltiOflal Airport 1340 North Outer Loop R oad Atlanta , GA 30337 

# I
#### Coghill’s Heirs *vs.*Burriss.

*Scire Faeiaii*

The demise can not be extended after a judgment in ejectment.

An order extending the demise made after the judment, and *ex*parte, is not merely voidable, ’ but void.

A *scieri facias*to revive a judg ment in ejectment, may be met and defeated, by a plea, showing that the demise was' extended by an *ex parte*order, after the judgment.

fMessrs. Sanders andDepew.for Plaintiffs : Messrs. Morehead and Brown for Defendant.]

From the General Court.

*April*10.

Judge Nicholas

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

To a *scire facias*to revive a judgment in ejectment, the defendant pleaded, that, more than twenty years after the rendition of the judgment, and fourteen years after the expiration of the original demise, the plaintiffs, by an *ex parte*motion, obtained an order of court extending the demise to forty years. Upon a demurrer to this plea, the court rendered judgment in bar of the *scire facias.*

The only question is, whether the order of court, extending the demise, is void.

It has long been settled by this court, that the demise cannot be extended after judgment in ejectment. This course of decision was earnestly assailed in argument, and the court invited to a revision of the principle and authority upon which it is based. After having made that revision, we think it well sustained by the weight of ante-revolutionary English cases, and in perfect consonance with the great leading principle governing the whole doctrine of amendments: that is, that there must be something to amend by.

The court having no power to make such amendment, there can be little doubt that the *ex parte*order making it in this case, is void, and not merely voidable. It stands upon the same footing with all judgments against a party without notice, actual or constructive, which have always been treated as absolutely void.

We perceive but little weight in the idea, that the defendant should be considered as still in court, and bound to notice every thing done in relation to the judgment *58against him, twenty years after the rendition of the judgment, and fourteen years after the expiration of the demise. We can find nothing either in the principles of law or justice to warrant such an extension of the *,*. . ,, . .. , t doctrine ot implied or constructive notice.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. SHEPARD, Respondent, v. ELLISON, Com’r, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Frederic White Shepard, against William B. Ellison, as commissioner of water supply, gas, and electricity, etc.

No opinion. Final order affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Benjamin Leboe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A-2 of C-Chip Technologies Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 8th day of June, 2004.



| | /s/ Benjamin Leboe
Benjamin Leboe
Principal Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------



---
#### § 1703.312 RUS review requirements.

Borrowers shall ensure that funds are invested in the rural development project as approved by RUS. The Administrator reserves the right to review the books and copy records of borrowers receiving loan payment deferments as necessary to ensure that the investments in the rural development project are in accordance with this subpart and the representations and purposes stated in the borrower's completed application. If an audit discloses that the amount deferred was not used for the purposes stated in the completed application, the borrower shall be required to promptly repay the amount deferred and the benefits of the deferment to the borrower will be recaptured by RUS. The borrower is responsible for ensuring that disbursements and expenditures of funds covering the investment in the rural development project are properly supported with certifications, invoices, contracts, bills of sale, cancelled checks, or any other forms of evidence determined appropriate by the Administrator and that such supporting material is available at the borrower's premises for review by the RUS field accountant, borrower's certified public accountant, the Office of Inspector General, the General Accounting Office and any other accountant conducting an audit of the borrower's financial statements for this rural development program.
* District Judge of the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by

designation.

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-20324

 

TRANSCONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PORT METAL PROCESSING, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-CV-2470)

 

July 12, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges, and DOWD*,

District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by Judge Werlein.

AFFIRMED.
EX-10.2(c)



 Exhibit 10.2(c) 
 June 1, 2012 
 Winton Capital Management 
 1a. St. Mary Abbot’s Place 
 Kensington, London W86LS, 

U.K. 
 Attention: Mr. Martin Hunt 

 

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr.
Hunt: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 CMF Winton Feeder I LP 



	 	•	 	 CMF Winton Master Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio LP 



	 	•	 	 Abingdon Futures Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Global Futures Funds Ltd. 



	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) Ltd. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/  Brian Centner

		 	      Brian Centner
		 	      Chief Financial Officer & Director

  

			
	WINTON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
		
	By:	 	 /s/  Andrew Bastow

	Print Name:	 	       Andrew Bastow

	BC/sr
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jpak Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Yijun Wang, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.  Dated: May 15, 2008/s/ Yijun WangYijun Wang
Chief Executive Officer, President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 1780.73 [Reserved]
|                                                                                                                                                                                                         |  |  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |  |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |  |
| NASA         Privacy, Security, Notices        Original Design Concept by Amanda Stolarski        Curator and Host :         David Herring        Responsible NASA Official : Dr.         Walter Hoegy |
#### § 160.24a Inspection as to condition of drums containing rosin and the quality and condition of the rosin therein upon request.

Before or after the shipment in commerce of any lot of rosin in drums from a processing or storage point, and upon request by an interested person, an inspection may be made by an official inspector of the external appearance of the drums, and a report may be made by such inspector, on the basis of such inspection, of the condition, including soundness, of the drums with reference to the effect thereof upon the quality, and preservation of the quality, of the rosin in the drums. In conjunction with such service, when practicable, the inspector may upon similar request determine and certify the grade, class, other quality, or condition of the rosin within the drums, and report the internal condition of the drums, under any applicable standards and procedural instructions issued to such inspector by the Administrator. Certificates and reports issued under this section will be furnished only to the interested person requesting the service. Fees and charges for service under this section shall be paid by such interested person in accordance with §§ 160.201, 160.202, and 160.204.

[20 FR 6433, Sept. 1, 1955]
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices 69947 

[FR Doc. 2010–28767 Filed 11–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 10–45] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation 

Agency, Department of Defense. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

following is a copy of a letter to the 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Transmittals 10–45 with attached 

transmittal, policy justification, and 

Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: November 9, 2010. 

Morgan F. Park, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN16NO10.024</GPH>
69948 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN16NO10.045</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices 69949 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN16NO10.046</GPH>
69950 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN16NO10.047</GPH> EN16NO10.048</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices 69951 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN16NO10.049</GPH>
69952 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN16NO10.050</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 16, 2010 / Notices 69953 

[FR Doc. 2010–28766 Filed 11–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 10–57] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601– 

3740. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

following is a copy of a letter to the 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Transmittals 10–57 with attached 

transmittal, policy justification, and 

Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: November 9, 2010. 

Morgan F. Park, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 


mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICESEN16NO10.051</GPH>
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

  Alaska

> - Anchorage

----
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**AFFINITYGROUP HOLDING, INC.**

 

**STATEMENTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I,Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AffinityGroup Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify asfollows:

 

1.             This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

1.             The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

 

2.             The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.

 

Date:  November 2, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/  Thomas F. Wolfe       |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas  F. Wolfe           |
|   | Senior  Vice President and |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer   |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or such otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of the writtenstatement as required by Section 906, has been provided to Affinity GroupHolding, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group Holding, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 69569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28780]



[[Page 69567]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of November 10, 2010--Continuation of the National Emergency 
With Respect To Iran


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 69569]]

                Notice of November 10, 2010

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect To Iran

                On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the 
                President declared a national emergency with respect to 
                Iran, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 
                Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706), to deal with the 
                unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 
                States constituted by the situation in Iran. Because 
                our relations with Iran have not yet returned to 
                normal, and the process of implementing the January 19, 
                1981, agreements with Iran is still underway, the 
                national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, must 
                continue in effect beyond November 14, 2010. Therefore, 
                consistent with section 202(d) of the National 
                Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
                for 1 year this national emergency with respect to 
                Iran.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    November 10, 2010.

[FR Doc. 2010-28780
Filed 11-10-10; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3195-W1-P
§ 1788.48 Contract insurance requirements. Contracts entered into between borrowers and contractors, engineers, and architects shall provide that they take out and maintain throughout the contract period insurance of the following types and minimum amounts: ( a ) Workers' compensation and employers' liability insurance, as required by law, covering all their employees who perform any of the obligations of the contractor, engineer, and architect under the contract. If any employer or employee is not subject to the workers' compensation laws of the governing state, then insurance shall be obtained voluntarily to extend to the employer and employee coverage to the same extent as though the employer or employee were subject to the workers' compensation laws.
( b ) Public liability insurance covering all operations under the contract shall have limits for bodily injury or death of not less than $1 million each occurrence, limits for property damage of not less than $1 million each occurrence, and $1 million aggregate for accidents during the policy period. A single limit of $1 million of bodily injury and property damage is acceptable. This required insurance may be in a policy or policies of insurance, primary and excess including the umbrella or catastrophe form.
( c ) Automobile liability insurance on all motor vehicles used in connection with the contract, whether owned, non-owned, or hired, shall have limits for bodily injury or death of not less than $1 million per person and $1 million per occurrence, and property damage limits of $1 million for each occurrence. This required insurance may be in a policy or policies of insurance, primary and excess including the umbrella or catastrophe form.
( d ) When a borrower contracts for the installation of major equipment by other than the supplier or for the moving of major equipment from one location to another, the contractor shall furnish the borrower with an installation floater policy. The policy shall cover all risks of damage to the equipment until completion of the installation contract.