alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 185 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 57
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 185

                          [Report No. 113-232]

  To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 East Pecan 
      Street in Sherman, Texas, as the ``Paul Brown United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2013

   Mr. Hall introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                           September 27, 2013

   Additional sponsors: Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Ms. 
    Granger, Mr. Poe of Texas, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. 
 Culberson, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Doggett, Mr. Gohmert, 
  Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Barton, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. McCaul, Mr. 
     Conaway, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Flores, Mr. 
Neugebauer, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Williams, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. Gene Green 
of Texas, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Carter, Mr. Stockman, 
                        Mr. Olson, and Mr. Vela

                           September 27, 2013

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 East Pecan 
      Street in Sherman, Texas, as the ``Paul Brown United States 
                             Courthouse''.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 101 East Pecan Street in 
Sherman, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``Paul Brown 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Paul Brown 
United States Courthouse''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 57

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 185

                          [Report No. 113-232]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To designate the United States courthouse located at 101 East Pecan 
      Street in Sherman, Texas, as the ``Paul Brown United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 27, 2013

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THEREGISTRANT**

Thefollowing is a list of the subsidiaries of the Company:

|            | ** ** | ** **                                          | ** ** | **   Place of** |
|------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------|
| ** ** | ** ** | **Subsidiary**                                      | ** ** | ** **                | ** ** | **Incorporation** | ** ** | ** ** |
| 1)         |       | Candela Iberica,  S.A.                              |       | Spain                     |
| 2)         |       | Candela France  SARL                                |       | France                    |
| 3)         |       | Candela KK                                          |       | Japan                     |
| 4)         |       | Candela  Deutschland GmbH                           |       | Germany                   |
| 5)         |       | Candela Italia                                      |       | Italy                     |
| 5)         |       | Candela Skin Care  Centers of Boston, Inc.     |       | Massachusetts             |
| 6)         |       | Candela Skin Care  Centers of Scottsdale, Inc. |       | Massachusetts             |
|            |            |                                                     |            |                           |  |  |  |  |

 

 

----
#### § 15a.120 Transfers of property.

If a recipient sells or otherwise transfers property financed in whole or in part with Federal financial assistance to a transferee that operates any education program or activity, and the Federal share of the fair market value of the property is not upon such sale or transfer properly accounted for to the Federal Government, both the transferor and the transferee shall be deemed to be recipients, subject to the provisions of §§ 15a.205 through 15a.235(a).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of New Design Cabinets, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth P. Laurent, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kenneth P. Laurent

Kenneth P. Laurent

Chief Executive Officer



November 2, 2005
#### Kremer Construction Company, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v City of Yonkers, Appellant-Respondent.

— In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the parties cross-appeal, as limited by their briefs, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 29, 1978, which, *inter alia,*denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the plaintiff’s first cause of action and directed a verdict thereon in favor of plaintiff in a specific sum. Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the third decretal paragraph thereof (which directed verdict in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $41,198.23) and substituting therefor provisions holding that the defendant is liable to the plaintiff under the first cause of action and directing that a new trial shall be held limited to the issue of damages only. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Trial Term for a new trial in accordance herewith. Upon the record before this court we find no error in the action of the trial court in amending the plaintiff’s first cause of action, denominated as in breach of contract to one in *quantum meruit,*to conform the pleading to the proof adduced at trial. Defendant was neither surprised nor misled by the conversion (see CPLR 3025, subd [c]; *Diemer v Diemer,*8 NY2d 206). Further, it is not apparent how reasonable minds could differ upon the issue of defendant’s liability to pay for materials, approved by it, and actually supplied to the project site since no evidence and no substantial inferences exist to refute the fact of liability. However, it does appear that the directed verdict was in error insofar as it fixed the amount of damages since questions of fact relative thereto appear on the record. Hence, to that extent, the verdict must be modified. Titone, J. P., Cohalan, Martuscello and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the annual report of Innova Pure Water, Inc. on Form 10-KSB/A#3 for the year ended June 30, 2006, I hereby certify, solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.The annual report on Form 10-KSB/A#3 of Innova Pure Water, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Innova Pure Water, Inc. fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innova Pure Water, Inc. as of, and for, the periods represented in this annual report.  Date: March 12, 2008/s/ J. T. ThatchPrint Name:J. T. ThatchTitle:President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Jim R. DavissonPrint Name:Jim R. DavissonTitle:Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer   1
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


            /s/ Richard Rappaport
            --------------------------------------
            Richard Rappaport
            President (Principal Executive Officer)


            /s/ Anthony C. Pintsopoulos
            --------------------------------------
            Anthony C. Pintsopoulos
            Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

November 7, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SRKP 2, Inc. and will be retained by SRKP 2, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: How to Keep Track of Vaccinations      

# Resource: How to Keep Track of Vaccinations

This webpage provides tips for caregivers on keeping track of what shots teens have had and when others may be due. It also includes a helpful checklist of vaccines needed at different stages of a child’s life

http://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/adolescent-health-topics/physical-health-and-nutrition/vaccines/tips.html?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links
2006-0775.

#### Kinsey v. Karnes.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Kris John Kinsey. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
## N iona1 i nergy d',, se-- ^,a i "lalue James E. McMahon (JEMcM ahonLBL.go v) Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

U. S. D OE Workshop on Standards for Distribution Transformers November 1, 2000 

## w

## Purpose

N ati onal energy savings (NES) analysis will estimate the total energy savings for f i -jo^ U.S. by comparing two scenarios:

- Base case. Expected electricity consumption absent new standards for transformers.

- Standards case. Expected electricity consumption given candidate standards levels for transformers. • Energy savings will be estimated for several alternative candidate standards levels.

## ey

Tonal Energy Savings

• Time period from start date of standards to 

### a fi xe d future d at e (e.g., 20 06- 2050) • Annual number of transformers purchased - Probability of retirement as transformers age • Annual energy consumption - by class (e.g., low and medium voltage)

3Me



## 1Energy bavings

• Calculate annual energy consumption by transformers, base case and standards cases • D efine energy savings as difference from base case
• Calculate annual and cumulative energy savings

### lEnergy Savings Energy savings: new ballast standards (T 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 iI [I tI I II I I1 I I'I I'1 I`) fI IIT pp ph O^ poi ^ ►^ ^"^ ^^ ,^'l ^p 3 h '\ p tp qp Cp Cp ^p ^p Cp Cp tip tip ^p^ ^p^ ^p^ ^p^ ^p^ YEAR Cumulative savings (2005-2030): 238 Twh s• National energy savings analysis

• Operating expenses - including electricity prices Installed owner cost of transformers

## ethod:

N et Prese nt V alu e (N PV

• Calculate annual installed owner costs and operating costs
• Calculate annual net costs or benefits for standards compared to base case • NP V = discounted sum of annual net costs or benefits over lifetime of transformers purchased by end dateA nnual Eco n omic Impacts of Ballast Standards 1000 800

0 -2 0 0 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Energy Cost Saving N et Saving Price Change

NET PRE SENT VALUE: $ 2.6 billion B enefit ( $ 3.5 b) ® Cost ($0.9 b ) (1997$ at 7%) 8• National electricity savings (NES):

= Electricity (at baseline efficiency) - Electricity (at efficiency level above baseline) • Net present value (NTV) > 0 indicates net economic savings. NPV <0 indicates net costs. • Analyze several alternative candidate standards levels.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. §1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. (the "Registrant") for the
period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lynn A. Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
November 4, 2010

By:

/s/ LYNN A. PETERSON Lynn A. Peterson Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements:



|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|(1) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-132961) of Health Management Associates, Inc.;                                                                                                                                           
|    | 
|(2) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-65382) pertaining to the Health Management Associates, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan;                                                                                                      
|    | 
|(3) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-80433) pertaining to the Health Management Associates, Inc. 1996 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan and the Health Management Associates, Inc. Stock
Option Plan for Outside Directors;
|    | 
|(4) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-53602) pertaining to the Health Management Associates, Inc. 1996 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan; and                                                                              
|    | 
|(5) |  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-132037) pertaining to the Health Management Associates, Inc. 2006 Outside Director Restricted Stock Award Plan;                                                                          

of our report dated February 24, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Health Management Associates, Inc., and our report dated February 24, 2009, with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Health Management Associates, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Certified Public Accountants

Miami, Florida

February 24, 2009
Exhibit 10.1(bd)


 


THIRD AMENDMENT


TO


THE SAUER-DANFOSS EMPLOYEES’
RETIREMENT PLAN


(As
Amended and Restated, Effective January 1, 2000


and
Renamed As of May 3, 2000)


 


                By
virtue and in exercise of the amending power reserved to Sauer Danfoss Company
(the “Company”) by subsection 16.2 of the Sauer-Danfoss Employees’ Retirement
Plan (As Amended and Restated, Effective January 1, 2000 and Renamed As of May
3, 2000) (the “Plan”), and pursuant to the authority delegated to the
undersigned officer of the Company by the Employee Benefit Committee of the
Company, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2001, by
adding the following phrase immediately after “or 414(h)(12) in the first
sentence of Section 11.8:



                                “, and
effective January 1, 2001, Code Section 132(f)(4);”


 


 


 


                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above amendment is adopted this 25th
day of February, 2002.


 


	
   

  	
  SAUER
  DANFOSS (US) COMPANY

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ KENNETH D. McCUSKEY

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  Vice
  President Finance
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 7

- 0 0 790

- C R

Style: Frank Gill v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : Febr uary 2 1 , 201 8

Type of motion: Second Motion for E xtension of T ime to File Appellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant ’s appoin ted counsel Danny K. Easterling

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: Dec ember 1 1 , 201 7

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due D ate: February 9 , 201 8

Date Requested: April 9 , 201 8 (1 19 days from original due date)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: April 9 , 201 8

.  No further extensions of time will be granted

.  Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

The Clerk of this Court’s February 20, 2018 notice warned counsel that because his

brief had not been timely filed, if the Court does not receive a motion or br ief within 10

days of that notice, it would abate this case for a late

- brief hearing. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

38.8(b)(2). Because appellant’s counsel’s request was timely and states that he has

been busy with several court appearances and other appeals, it is granted

, but counsel

is warned that no further extensions will be granted due to the total length requested.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b)(1)(B), (C), 38.6(d)

. Accordingly, if appellant’s brief is not

filed by April 9 , 201 8

, this Court may abate this case. See id. 38.8(b)(2)

.

Judge’ s signature: /s/ L a ura C. Higley

 Acting for the Court

Date: February 2 7 , 2018
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1427.20 Handling payments of $9.99 or less and collections not exceeding $24.99. ( a ) Amounts of $9.99 or less will be paid to the producer only upon request.
( b ) Deficiencies of $24.99 or less, including interest, may be disregarded unless CCC demands in writing that they be paid.
[80 FR 135, Jan. 2, 2015]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of M.L. Macadamia Orchards, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/Afor the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersignedmanagement of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,

 

(3)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(4)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Wayne W.  Roumagoux  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Wayne W.  Roumagoux      |
| Chief Financial  Officer |
| May 26,  2005       |

 

1

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40160

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WILBER MENDOZA-CORTEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-766-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Wilber Mendoza-Cortez has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mendoza-Cortez has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40160 Document: 00511382074 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
#### § 1720.2 [Reserved]