alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Suicide and Homicide Death Rates Among Youth and Young Adults Aged 10–24: United States, 2001–2021      

# Resource: Suicide and Homicide Death Rates Among Youth and Young Adults Aged 10–24: United States, 2001–2021

This report (PDF, 7 pages) uses the most recent data from the National Vital Statistics System to present trends from 2001 through 2021 in suicide and homicide rates for young people aged 10–24. Data is presented by age groups 10–14, 15–19, and 20–24. **Learn more.**
#### Audrey Lane, appellee, v. Peter Tutules and William Kaplan, appellants.

Gen. No. 33,092.

Opinion filed May 29, 1929.

Morris K. Levinson, for appellants. Marx Loehwing and John T. Murray, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Ryner

delivered the opinion of the court.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1450.12 Miscellaneous. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, in the case of death, incompetency, or disappearance of any participant, any payments due under this part may be paid to the participant's successor(s) in accordance with part 707 of this title.
( b ) Unless otherwise specified in this part, payments under this part will be subject to the compliance requirements of part 12 of this title concerning highly erodible land and wetland conservation and payments.
( c ) Any remedies permitted CCC under this part will be in addition to any other remedy, including, but not limited to, criminal remedies or actions for damages in favor of CCC, or the United States as may be permitted by law.
( d ) Absent a scheme or device to defeat the purposes of BCAP, when an owner loses control of BCAP acreage enrolled under subpart C of this part due to foreclosure and the new owner chooses not to continue the contract in accordance with § 1450.215 refunds will not be required from any participant on the contract to the extent that the Deputy Administrator determines that forgiving such repayment is appropriate in order to provide fair and equitable treatment.
[75 FR 66234, Oct. 27, 2010. Redesignated at 80 FR 10573, Feb. 27, 2015]
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET Attachment Number 005 Attachment Name Attachment 5 CaCoPbSrTiWO Structure Associated PMN Section Number Pt.I, Sec.B, le. (Chem 3)

Does not contain CBI

Report Number CONSi 10317786855351Attachment 

### 5 CaCoPbSrTiWO Structure REPORT# - CONS110317786855351 Calcium Strontium Lead Titanate Trade names: PT; Lead Titanate; LM-95 Ca- Sr-PT is processed in 160 kg batches, weighing and batching is 4 hrs/batch, powder break-up and calcine is 8 hrs/batch (exposure time); final mill and spray dry is 4 hrslbatch. Total process exposure time is 16 hours/batch, maximum 13 batches/year. See process flow chart for detailed process. Ca- Sr-PT has an infinite repeating crystal structure of the ABO3 Peroyskite structure where A=Pb, Sr and Ca; B= Ti, W and Co Formula is: (Pb. 7 1 .77 Ca..28 32 Sr 0. 02 . 06 

### ) Ti..92,9 ^( 0 5 Co0.0.04-.8 

### 03 where the Pb +

### Ca + 

### Sr mole ratio =1.0 and the Ti + W + Co mole ratio =1.0


# 0 0 Constituents: Lead oxide 60-66 wt% Calcium oxide 12-1 Swt % Titanium dioxide 20-22 Wt% Strontium oxide 1-3 wt% Tungsten oxide 2-3 wt % Cobalt oxide 1-2 wt %
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1304

KATHRYN DUVALL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware

Corporation; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, a Delaware

Corporation,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District

Judge. (2:06-cv-03544-CWH)

Submitted: June 19, 2008 Decided: June 23, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kathryn Duvall, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret League Boylston,

PETERS, MURDAUGH, PARKER, ELTZROTH & DETRICK, PA, Hampton, South

Carolina, Benjamin Phillip Glass, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &

STEWART, PC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

Although Duvall summarily requests an order redacting all of

her personal information and work history from the court’s records,

as well as an order sealing the court’s records, because she has

not established she is entitled to this relief, we deny Duvall’s

requests.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kathryn Duvall appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her defamation

claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.* See Duvall v.

Honeywell Tech. Solutions, Inc., No. 2:06-cv-03544-CWH (D.S.C.

filed Feb. 6, 2008; entered Feb. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 160.203 Fees for inspection and certification of other naval stores material.

Whenever it shall be deemed practical and in the interest of the naval stores trade to sample, inspect, analyze and certify any naval stores material other than spirits of turpentine or rosin, at the request of an interested person, the fees for such inspection shall be the same as the fees prescribed for spirits of turpentine.

[17 FR 189, Jan. 8, 1952]
#### In the Matter of Federal Insurance Company, Appellant, v Roberta Rivers et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 17, 1979, which denied its application to stay arbitration and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration. Judgment reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remitted to Trial Term for a hearing and new determination in accordance herewith. Trial Term had two questions referred to it for determination. Upon receiving a concession on the issue of coverage, it made its determination on the issue of timeliness on the papers before it and without conducting an evidentiary hearing. This was error. Insofar as it appears on the present record, the court should have conducted a hearing on the issue of the timeliness of petitioner’s application to stay arbitration as per the order of Special Term* referring the matter to Trial Term for determination. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Rabin, Gulotta and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Judy A. Donnelly, Appellant, v. Lawrence W. Strickland, Respondent.

Order unanimously modified, and as modified affirmed, without costs, and matter remitted to Yates County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the Memorandum, for determination only as to the amount respondent should pay for the support of the child. Memorandum: Petitioner-mother appeals from a Family Court order granting $5 a week for the support of the six-year-old daughter of the parties. Family Court properly determined that respondent-father owed a duty of support to the child, but it cannot be determined from the confused state of this record the fair amount which he should be directed to pay. It is clear that the allowance of $5 is insufficient to provide adequately for the child. The record seems to suggest that the father’s excuse for past and present nonsupport is his impecunious financial condition. A full and complete new hearing should be had to determine the amount of support, during which both parties, as well as other material witnesses, should be examined to ascertain specifically in definite terms the financial condition of both parents. Appellant claims that respondent has the training and capacity to be employed steadily and gainfully, but that he refuses to accept employment or make any sustained effort to earn a sufficient income to support the child fairly and reasonably. This charge should be fully explored in compliance with the father’s duty of support under section 413 of the Family Court Act which provides that “ The father of a minor child is chargeable with the support of his child *800and, if possessed of sufficient means *or able lo earn such means,*may be required to pay for his support a fair and reasonable sum according to his means, as the court may determine.” (Italics added.) The new hearing herein ordered should be had before a different Judge than the one who made the order which is the subject of this appeal. (Appeal from order of Yates County Family Court granting petition for support of minor.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1813 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.1813

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 162 Northeast Avenue in Tallmadge, Ohio, as the ``Lance Corporal 
          Daniel Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL DANIEL NATHAN DEYARMIN, JR., POST OFFICE 
BUILDING.
    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal 
Service located at 162 Northeast Avenue in Tallmadge, Ohio, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Daniel Nathan Deyarmin, 
Jr., Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Daniel Nathan Deyarmin, Jr., Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 10
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 10
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 10
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 10
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 10
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 10
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 10
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 10
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 10
#### § 1724.8 Restrictions on lobbying.

Borrowers shall comply with the restrictions and requirements in connection with procurement activities as set forth in 2 CFR part 418.

[79 FR 76003, Dec. 19, 2014]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2016 

# Order

January 22, 2016

152994 ( 64)(65 )

EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY

COMPANY

, Plaintiff

- Counter Defendant

Appell ee

,

v

HELICON ASSOCIATES, INC. and ESTATE OF

MICHAEL J. WITUCKI

, Defendant

- Counter Plaintiffs,

and

DR. CHARLES DREW ACADEMY and JEREMY

GILLIAM,

Defendants,

and

WELLS FARGO ADVANTAGE NATIONAL TAX

FREE FUND, WELLS FARGO ADVANTAGE

MUNICIPAL BOND FUND, LORD ABBETT

MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND, INC. and PIONEER

MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME ADVANTAGE,

Defendants

- Appell ants

. SC: 152994

COA: 322215

Wayne CC: 12

- 002767

- CK

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motions for the temporary admission of out

- of

state attorneys Scott W. Wilkinson and George R. Lyons to appear and practice under

MCR 8.126(A) on behalf of defendants

- appellants are GRANTED.
Exhibit 10.8

LOGO

December 30, 2008

Kairus K. Tarapore

[Address]

Re:    Executive Employment Agreement

Dear Kairus:

This letter will constitute an amendment clarifying the terms of your Executive Employment Agreement, amended and restated November 9, 2007
(Employment Agreement), which amendment is intended to assure compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

Section 1.10, which defines Good Reason, will require you to provide Ceridian a 30-day period for the opportunity to cure any event for which you have provided written notice.

Sections 4.03(a) and 7.03(f), concerning the execution of a release, are amended to require that you submit your executed release to Ceridian within 30
days of your termination of employment. In addition, the last sentence of the form of Release attached to your Employment Agreement will be revised to read as follows: If I do not return to Ceridian an executed duplicate original of this
Release within 30 days following my termination of employment, Ceridian will have no obligation to make the payment described herein.

Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms of this amendment to your Employment Agreement by executing this letter where indicated below and returning it to the undersigned.



Sincerely,CERIDIAN CORPORATION/s/ Michael W. SheridanMichael W. Sheridan, Executive Vice President,General Counsel and Secretary




|                       
|-----------------------
|Accepted:              
|                       
|/s/ Kairus K. Tarapore 
|Kairus K. Tarapore     
|Date: December 30, 2008
{"@context": "https://wayback.archive-it.org/16698/20210520143743/http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "item": {"@id": "https:\/\/wayback.archive-it.org\/16698\/20210520143743\/http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/usnationalarchives", "name": "US National Archives"}}]}

















© 2021 Google LLC
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1427.1208 Payment. ( a ) Payments under this subpart will be determined by multiplying: ( 1 ) The payment rate, determined under § 1427.127, by
( 2 ) The net weight (gross weight minus the weight of bagging and ties) determined under paragraph (b) of this section, of eligible ELS cotton bales that an eligible domestic user opens or an eligible exporter exports during the Friday through Thursday period following a week in which a payment rate is established.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart, the net weight will be based upon: ( 1 ) For domestic users, the weight on which settlement for payment of the ELS cotton was based (landed mill weight);
( 2 ) For exporters, the shipping warehouse weight or the gin weight if the ELS cotton was not placed in a warehouse, of the eligible cotton unless the exporter obtains and pays the cost of having all the bales in the shipment re-weighed by a licensed weigher and furnishes a copy of the certified weights.
( c ) For the purposes of this subpart, eligible ELS cotton will be considered: ( 1 ) Consumed by the domestic user on the date the bale is opened for consumption; and
( 2 ) Exported by the exporter on the date that CCC determines is the date on which the cotton is shipped for export.
( d ) Payments under this subpart will be made available upon application for payment and submission of supporting documentation, as required by this subpart, CCC instructions, and the ELS Cotton Domestic User/Exporter Agreement.
[70 FR 67343, Nov. 7, 2005, as amended at 80 FR 139, Jan. 2, 2015]
##### 



Exhibit 4.6
 HAIGHTS CROSS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
 Warrant for the Purchase of Shares of  Common Stock of Haights Cross Communications, Inc.
 No. [#]
 Warrant to Purchase
 [Number] Shares
 THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE AND THE SECURITIES ISSUABLE UPON THE EXERCISE
OF THIS WARRANT HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (THE
ACT), OR ANY UNITED STATES STATE SECURITIES OR BLUE SKY LAWS AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD,
TRANSFERRED, HYPOTHECATED OR OTHERWISE ASSIGNED EXCEPT (1) PURSUANT TO A REGISTRATION
STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO SUCH SECURITIES WHICH IS EFFECTIVE UNDER THE ACT OR (2) PURSUANT
TO AN AVAILABLE EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE ACT RELATING TO THE DISPOSITION OF
SECURITIES AND (3) IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES AND BLUE SKY LAWS.
 WHEREAS, Company Series A Warrant Series A Preferred Stock
 WHEREAS, Recapitalization Common Stock
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,




---



##### 



WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, [HOLDER] Holder [Number] Warrant Shares
 DEFINITIONS.
  Affiliate
 Business Day
 Common Stock
 Exercise Price
 Expiration Date
 Fair Market Value
 2




---



##### 



Person
 Principal Holders
 Warrant Certificate
 Warrants
 EXERCISE OF WARRANT.
   3




---



##### 



RESTRICTIVE LEGEND.
 RESERVATION OF SHARES
 FRACTIONAL SHARES
  4




---



##### 



EXCHANGE, TRANSFER OR ASSIGNMENT OF WARRANT
   LOSS OR DESTRUCTION OF WARRANT.
 ANTI-DILUTION PROVISIONS. provided
  5




---



##### 



provided
  6




---



##### 



7




---



##### 



Daily Price NYSE NASDAQ
 8




---



##### 



provided
    9




---



##### 



CONSOLIDATION, MERGER, OR SALE OF ASSETS constituent Person non-electing share
 10




---



##### 



Redemptions pro rata pro rata
 NOTICES
 If to the Company:
    
    Haights Cross Communications, Inc.10 New King Street, Suite 110White Plains, New York 10604Attention: Paul J. Crecca, Chief Executive Officer and PresidentTelephone: (914) 289-9400Facsimile: (914) 289-9401With a copy to:
    
    Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels LLPOne Financial CenterBoston, Massachusetts 02111Attention: Philip J. Flink, Esq.Telephone: (617) 856-8200Facsimile: (617) 856-8201If to the Holder:
    
    [NAME and ADDRESS]
  11




---



##### 



RIGHTS OF THE HOLDER
 GOVERNING LAW. THIS WARRANT CERTIFICATE AND ALL RIGHTS ARISING HEREUNDER SHALL BE
CONSTRUED AND DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AND THE
PERFORMANCE THEREOF SHALL BE GOVERNED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUCH LAWS.
 AMENDMENTS; WAIVERS
 12




---



##### 



[DATE]
 HAIGHTS CROSS COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.By:Name:Title: Acknowledged and Agreed:[HOLDER]By:Name:Title:
 13




---



##### 



Shares
  Shares
  Shares
 Date:  ,
    
    ___.(Signature of Owner)(Street Address)(City) (State) (Zip Code)
 14




---



##### 



Shares Company
  Shares Company
  Shares Company
 Date:  ,
    
    ___.(Signature of Owner)(Street Address)(City) (State) (Zip Code)
 15




---



##### 



16




---



##### 



WARRANT ASSIGNMENT FORM
  Assignee
  
  17
MEDIATION REFERRALS

*15002006-0569.

#### State ex rel. Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Heinlen.

Franklin App. No. 05AP-360, 2006-Ohio-428.

*1499The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(E):
M. P. No. 79-487.

#### John Orzechowski *et al. v.*State.

Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.

*Decof, Weinstein b Mandell, Martin W. Aisenberg, Mark S. Mandell, Jay S. Goodman,*for petitioners, *Dennis J. Roberts II,*Attorney General, *John*S. *Foley,*Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Exhibit 23.2

             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                              
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Prospectus constituting part of this Registration Statement
on Form S-3 of our report dated May 2, 1997 appearing on page
F-1 of Pharmhouse Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended February 1, 1997.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial
Statement Schedule, which appears on page F-20 of such Annual
Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the reference to us
under the heading "Experts."


Price Waterhouse LLP
New York, New York
May 27, 1997
§ 1484.39 Changes to activities and funding. ( a ) *Adding a new activity.* ( 1 ) A Cooperator may not conduct a new activity without first obtaining an approved activity budget for such change. To request approval of such activity budget, the Cooperator shall submit a notification to CCC.
( 2 ) A notification for a new activity shall provide an activity justification and identify any related adjustments to the approved strategic plan, including changes in the market, constraint, or opportunity that the activity proposes to address. The notification shall contain the activity description, the proposed budget, and a justification for the transfer of funds.
( 3 ) After receipt of the notification, CCC will inform the Cooperator via the UES system whether the requested budget is approved.
( b ) *Modifying existing activities and their funding levels.* ( 1 ) A Cooperator desiring to increase the funding level for existing, approved activities addressing a single constraint or opportunity by more than $25,000 or 25 percent of the approved funding level, whichever is greater, must first submit a notification explaining the adjustment to CCC before making such change.
( 2 ) A Cooperator may make significant adjustments below the threshold in paragraph (b)(1) of this section to the funding levels for existing, approved activities without prior notification to CCC, but only if it submits a notification explaining the adjustments to CCC no later than 30 calendar days after the change. Minor adjustments to existing, approved activities and/or funding levels do not require notification.
( 3 ) Notifications shall describe the activity and any changes to the activity, the existing funding level, or the proposed funding level and shall include a justification for the transfer of funds, if applicable.