Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules 68733 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 24: Electrical power. 

Unsafe Condition 

(e) This AD results from a report of a direct 

current (DC) generator overvoltage event 

which caused smoke in the cockpit and 

damage to numerous avionics and electrical 

components. The Federal Aviation 

Administration is issuing this AD to detect 

and correct an overvoltage condition on the 

DC electrical busses caused by exciter stator 

winding failures, and subsequent failure of 

the generator control unit overvoltage 

protection circuitry, which could result in 

damage to critical electrical and avionics 

components. 

Compliance 

(f) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Inspection 

(g) For airplanes having serial numbers 

–0222, –0225 through –0293 inclusive, 

–0295, –0296, and –0298: Within 6 months 

or 600 flight hours after the effective date of 

this AD, whichever occurs later, inspect to 

determine the serial number of the auxiliary 

power unit (APU) generator and the left and 

right engine 400 amp DC generators, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Cessna Service Letter SL750– 

24–08, dated August 13, 2009. For airplanes 

that have one or more generators having a 

serial number 060 through 297 inclusive 

without suffix ‘‘C,’’ before further flight, 

replace the affected generator(s) with a new 

or serviceable generator, in accordance with 

the Accomplishment Instructions of Cessna 

Service Letter SL750–24–08, dated August 

13, 2009. 

Revision of the Airplane Flight Manual 

(AFM) 

(h) For airplanes having serial numbers 

–0222, and –0225 and subsequent: Within 30 

days after the effective date of this AD, revise 

Section II, Operating Limitations, Generator 

Limitations, page 2–12, of the applicable 

airplane flight manual (AFM) to include the 

information in the applicable Temporary 

Change (TC) required by paragraph (h)(1), 

(h)(2), or (h)(3) of this AD. These TCs 

introduce procedures for resetting the APU 

generator. Operate the airplane according to 

the limitations and procedures in the TCs. 

(1) For Model 750 Citation X (750–0173 

and on and airplanes incorporating SB750– 

71–10 AFM 75FMA, Revision 1, dated June 

13, 2002): Insert Cessna Temporary Change 

(TC) 75FMA TC–R01–46, dated April 23, 

2009. 

(2) For Model 750 Citation X (750–0173 

and on and airplanes incorporating SB750– 

71–10) AFM 75EUA, Revision 1, dated June 

19, 2002: Insert Cessna TC 75EUA TC–R01– 

35, dated May 8, 2009. 

(3) For Model 750 Citation X (750–0173 

and on and airplanes incorporating SB750– 

71–10) AFM 75EUMA, Revision 1, dated 

June 30, 2002: Insert Cessna TC 75EUMA 

TC–R01–35, dated May 8, 2009. 

Note 1: The AFM revisions required by 

paragraph (g) of this AD may be done by 

inserting copies of TCs 75FMA TC–R01–46, 

dated April 23, 2009; 75EUA TC–R01–35, 

dated May 8, 2009; or 75EUMA TC–R01–35, 

dated May 8, 2009; into the applicable AFM. 

When these TCs have been included in 

general revisions of the AFM, the general 

revisions may be inserted into the AFM, 

provided the relevant information in the 

general revision is identical to that in TCs. 

Parts Installation 

(i) As of the effective date of this AD, no 

person may install any Pacific Scientific 

generators having part number 92841–1 

(9914752–1) that has serial numbers 060 

through 297 without the suffix ‘‘C’’ on any 

airplane. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(j)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft 

Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Raymond 

Johnston, Aerospace Engineer, Electrical 

Systems and Avionics, ACE–119W, FAA, 

Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 

1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent 

Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone 

(316) 946–4197; fax (316) 946–4107. 

(2) To request a different method of 

compliance or a different compliance time 

for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 

39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on 

any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your principal maintenance inspector 

(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), 

as appropriate, or lacking a principal 

inspector, your local Flight Standards District 

Office. The AMOC approval letter must 

specifically reference this AD. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

November 2, 2010. 

Dionne Palermo, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28274 Filed 11–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 81 

[EPA–R02–OAR–2010–0688; FRL–9223–7] 

Approval and Promulgation of OneYear Extension for Attaining the 1997 

8-Hour Ozone Standard for the New 

Jersey Portion of the PhiladelphiaWilmington-Atlantic City Moderate 

Nonattainment Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA 

is proposing to approve an extension 

from June 15, 2010 to June 15, 2011 of 

the applicable attainment date for the 

New Jersey portion of the PhiladelphiaWilmington-Atlantic City 1997 8-hour 

ozone nonattainment area (Philadelphia 

Area), which is classified as moderate 

nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone national ambient air quality 

standard (NAAQS). This proposed 

extension is based in part on complete, 

quality-assured air quality data recorded 

during the 2009 ozone season. In 

accordance with requirements for a 1- 

year extension, the Philadelphia Area’s 

4th highest daily 8-hour monitored 

ozone value during the 2009 ozone 

season at each monitor in the area is less 

than 0.084 parts per million (ppm). If 

EPA finalizes this proposed approval of 

the attainment date extension, EPA will 

revise the table with regard to the 8- 

hour ozone attainment dates for the 

New Jersey portion of the Philadelphia 

Area. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before December 9, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID number EPA– 

R02–OAR–2010–0688, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: Werner.Raymond@epa.gov. 

• Fax: 212–637–3901. 

• Mail: Raymond Werner, Chief, Air 

Programs Branch, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 

Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New 

York 10007–1866. 

• Hand Delivery: Raymond Werner, 

Chief, Air Programs Branch, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th 

Floor, New York, New York 10007– 

1866. Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Regional Office’s normal 

hours of operation. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R02–OAR–2010– 

0688. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
68734 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch, 

290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, 

New York 10007–1866. EPA requests, if 

at all possible, that you contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to view 

the hard copy of the docket. You may 

view the hard copy of the docket 

Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 

4 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Truchan, Air Programs Branch, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 290 

Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New 

York 10007–1866, (212) 637–4249; 

e-mail address: Truchan.Paul@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. New Jersey’s Request for Attainment 

Date Extension for the Philadelphia 

Area 

On June 23, 2010, the State of New 

Jersey requested a one-year attainment 

date extension for the Philadelphia 

Area. The Philadelphia Area, which is 

classified as moderate for the 1997 

8-hour ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS), consists of 

Cecil County in Maryland; Bucks, 

Chester, Delaware, Montgomery and 

Philadelphia Counties in Pennsylvania; 

the entire State of Delaware; and 

Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape 

May, Cumberland, Gloucester, Mercer, 

Ocean, and Salem Counties in New 

Jersey. Since this area was classified as 

a moderate ozone nonattainment area, 

the statutory ozone attainment date, as 

prescribed by section 181(a) of the Clean 

Air Act (CAA), is June 15, 2010. New 

Jersey requested that the attainment date 

be extended to June 15, 2011. 

II. CAA Requirements and EPA Actions 

Regarding One-Year Extensions 

Section 181(a)(5) of the CAA provides 

for a 1-year extension of the applicable 

attainment date for an ozone 

nonattainment area if the State has 

complied with the requirements in the 

applicable implementation plan and 

there is no more than one exceedance of 

the NAAQS in the year preceding the 

extension year. 40 CFR 51.907 sets forth 

how section 181(a)(5) applies to an area 

subject to the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. Under 40 CFR 51.907, an area 

will meet the requirement of section 

181(a)(5)(B) of the CAA pertaining to 

one-year extensions of the attainment 

date if: 

(a) For the first 1-year extension, the 

area’s 4th highest daily 8-hour average 

in the attainment year is 0.084 parts per 

million (ppm) or less, 

(b) For the second 1-year extension, 

the area’s 4th highest daily 8-hour 

value, averaged over both the original 

attainment year and the first extension 

year, is 0.084 ppm or less. 

(c) For purposes of paragraphs (a) and 

(b) of this section, the area’s 4th highest 

daily 8-hour average shall be from the 

monitor with the highest 4th highest 

daily 8-hour average of all the monitors 

that represent that area. 

EPA’s review of the actual ozone air 

quality data in the Air Quality System 

shows that the 4th highest daily average 

8-hour ozone concentrations for the 

2009 attainment year ozone season, for 

all monitors in the Philadelphia Area 

measured less than 0.084 ppm (Table 1), 

as required by 40 CFR 51.907(a). The 

highest-reading monitoring site had a 

4th high value for 2009 of 0.074 ppm 

(Bucks/Pennsylvania). The monitoring 

data has been quality-controlled and 

quality-assured. 

TABLE 1—MONITORING DATA FOR 8-HOUR OZONE IN THE PHILADELPHIA AREA

Site ID County/state Year 

4th Max 

8-hr 

(ppm) 

10–001–0002 .............................................. Kent/Delaware ............................................................................... 2009 .066 

10–003–1007 .............................................. New Castle/Delaware .................................................................... 2009 .068 

10–003–1010 .............................................. New Castle/Delaware .................................................................... 2009 .068 

10–003–1013 .............................................. New Castle/Delaware .................................................................... 2009 .069 

10–005–1002 .............................................. Sussex/Delaware ........................................................................... 2009 .067 

10–005–1003 .............................................. Sussex/Delaware ........................................................................... 2009 .069 

24–015–0003 .............................................. Cecil/Maryland ............................................................................... 2009 .072 

42–017–0012 .............................................. Bucks/Pennsylvania ....................................................................... 2009 .074 

42–029–0100 .............................................. Chester/Pennsylvania .................................................................... 2009 .067 

42–045–0002 .............................................. Delaware/Pennsylvania ................................................................. 2009 .065 

42–091–0013 .............................................. Montgomery/Pennsylvania ............................................................. 2009 .070 

42–101–0004 .............................................. Philadelphia/Pennsylvania ............................................................. 2009 .059 

42–101–0024 .............................................. Philadelphia/Pennsylvania ............................................................. 2009 .072 

34–001–0006 .............................................. Atlantic/New Jersey ....................................................................... 2009 .071 

34–007–1001 .............................................. Camden/New Jersey ..................................................................... 2009 .071 

34–011–0007 .............................................. Cumberland/New Jersey ............................................................... 2009 .072 

34–015–0002 .............................................. Gloucester/New Jersey .................................................................. 2009 .071 

34–021–0005 .............................................. Mercer/New Jersey ........................................................................ 2009 .071 

34–029–0006 .............................................. Ocean/New Jersey ........................................................................ 2009 .071 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Proposed Rules 68735 

EPA has determined that the 

requirements for a one-year extension of 

the attainment date have been fulfilled 

as follows: 

(1) New Jersey has complied with all 

requirements and commitments 

pertaining to the area in the applicable 

ozone implementation plan. New 

Jersey’s applicable ozone 

implementation plan can be found at 40 

CFR 52.1570. The most recent actions 

related to New Jersey’s applicable ozone 

implementation plan can be found at 

EPA’s rulemakings: ‘‘Approval and 

Promulgation of Implementation Plans; 

New Jersey Reasonable Further Progress 

Plans, Reasonably Available Control 

Technology, Reasonably Available 

Control Measures and Conformity 

Budgets’’ proposed January 16, 2009 (74 

FR 2945) and final rulemaking May 15, 

2009 (74 FR 22837); ‘‘Approval and 

Promulgation of Implementation Plans; 

Implementation Plan Revision; State of 

New Jersey’’ proposed April 23, 2010 (75 

FR 21197) and final rulemaking August 

3, 2010 (74 FR 45483); and ‘‘Approval 

and Promulgation of Implementation 

Plans; New Jersey; 8-hour Ozone 

Control Measure’’ proposed July 22, 

2010 (75 FR 42672); and 

(2) The maximum 4th highest daily 

8-hour monitored value at any 

monitoring site in the Philadelphia area 

during the 2009 ozone season was 0.074 

ppm, which is below the 0.084 ppm 

criteria. 

Therefore, EPA is proposing to 

approve the State’s request for an 

extension of the attainment date for the 

New Jersey portion of the Philadelphia 

Area to June 15, 2011. If the approval is 

finalized, the table in 40 CFR 81.331 

will be modified to reflect EPA’s 

approval of New Jersey’s attainment 

date extension request. The table is 

entitled ‘‘New Jersey-Ozone (8-Hour 

Standard).’’ 

III. Conclusion 

Pursuant to CAA section 181(a) and 

40 CFR 51.907, EPA is proposing to 

approve an attainment date extension 

from June 15, 2010 to June 15, 2011 for 

the New Jersey portion of the 

Philadelphia Area, which is classified as 

moderate for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. EPA is publishing this rule as 

a proposal in the Proposed Rules section 

of this Federal Register, and receiving 

public comments until December 9, 

2010. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 

51735, October 4, 1993), this action is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and 

therefore is not subject to review by the 

Office of Management and Budget. For 

this reason, this action is also not 

subject to Executive Order 13211, 

‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May 

22, 2001)). This action determines, 

based on air quality considerations and 

compliance with the State 

implementation plan, that an area has 

qualified for a one-year extension of the 

attainment date of a previously 

established NAAQS, and imposes no 

additional requirements. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments and therefore 

does not impose any additional 

enforceable duties, as described in the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–4). 

• Does not have a substantial direct 

effect on one or more Indian Tribes, on 

the relationship between the Federal 

Government and Indian Tribes, or on 

the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian Tribes, as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will 

it have substantial direct effects on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999), because it merely 

determines that an area has attained a 

Federal standard, and does not alter the 

relationship or the distribution of power 

and responsibilities established in the 

CAA. 

• Is not subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), 

because it is not economically 

significant. 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

• Will not have disproportionately 

high and adverse human health or 

environmental effects on minority or 

low-income populations because it does 

not affect the level of protection 

provided to human health or the 

environment. 

• Does not affect the level of 

protection provided to human health or 

the environment because extending the 

attainment date does not alter the 

emission reduction measures that are 

required to be implemented in the 

Philadelphia Area, which is classified as 

moderate nonattainment for the 1997 8- 

hour ozone standard. See 69 FR at 

23909 (April 30, 2004). 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

If the Philadelphia Area were not 

granted an extension of its attainment 

date, EPA’s recourse would be to initiate 

a reclassification of the Philadelphia 

Area from its current classification of 

moderate nonattainment to serious 

nonattainment, pursuant to section 

181(b)(2) of the CAA. Because the 

Philadelphia Area was formerly a severe 

nonattainment area under the revoked 

1-hour ozone standard (see 56 FR at 

56773, November 6, 1991), it is required 

to continue to implement severe area 

requirements pursuant to EPA’s 

interpretation of ‘‘anti-backsliding’’ 

provision of section 172(e) of the CAA. 

See 69 FR at 23973, April 30, 2004, 

South Coast Air Quality Management 

District v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (DC Cir. 

2006), modified and rehearing den., 489 

F.3d 1245 (DC Cir. 2007). The severe 

area requirements are more stringent 

than both the moderate and serious area 

requirements set forth in Title I, Part D, 

Subpart 2 of the CAA. Therefore, even 

if EPA were to not grant the attainment 

date extension and instead move to 

reclassify the area to serious 

nonattainment, no additional emission 

reduction measures would be required 

to be implemented in the Philadelphia 

Area through a 181(b)(2) 

reclassification. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: October 20, 2010. 

Judith A. Enck, 

Regional Administrator, Region 2. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28254 Filed 11–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with PROPOSALS_PART 1