Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices 69467 

Drug Schedule 

Benzoylecgonine (9180) .............................................................................................................................................................................. II 

The company plans to manufacture 

small quantities of the listed controlled 

substances for use in diagnostic 

products. 

No comments or objections have been 

received. DEA has considered the 

factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 

determined that the registration of 

Varian Inc., to manufacture the listed 

basic classes of controlled substances is 

consistent with the public interest at 

this time. DEA has investigated Varian 

Inc., to ensure that the company’s 

registration is consistent with the public 

interest. The investigation has included 

inspection and testing of the company’s 

physical security systems, verification 

of the company’s compliance with state 

and local laws, and a review of the 

company’s background and history. 

Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), 

and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, 

the above named company is granted 

registration as a bulk manufacturer of 

the basic classes of controlled 

substances listed. 

Dated: November 1, 2010. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28515 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Manufacturer of Controlled 

Substances; Notice of Registration 

By Notice dated June 17, 2010, and 

published in the Federal Register on 

June 28, 2010, (75 FR 36683), Penick 

Corporation, 33 Industrial Road, 

Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made 

application by renewal to the Drug 

Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 

be registered as a bulk manufacturer of 

the basic classes of controlled 

substances listed in schedule II: 

Drug Schedule 

Cocaine (9041) ............................. II 

Codeine (9050) ............................. II 

Dihydrocodeine (9120) ................. II 

Oxycodone (9143) ........................ II 

Hydromorphone (9150) ................ II 

Diphenoxylate (9170) ................... II 

Ecgonine (9180) ........................... II 

Hydrocodone (9193) ..................... II 

Morphine (9300) ........................... II 

Oripavine (9330) ........................... II 

Drug Schedule 

Thebaine (9333) ........................... II 

Oxymorphone (9652) ................... II 

The company plans to manufacture 

the listed controlled substances as bulk 

controlled substance intermediates for 

distribution to its customers. 

No comments or objections have been 

received. DEA has considered the 

factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 

determined that the registration of 

Penick Corporation to manufacture the 

listed basic classes of controlled 

substances is consistent with the public 

interest at this time. DEA has 

investigated Penick Corporation to 

ensure that the company’s registration is 

consistent with the public interest. The 

investigation has included inspection 

and testing of the company’s physical 

security systems, verification of the 

company’s compliance with state and 

local laws, and a review of the 

company’s background and history. 

Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), 

and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, 

the above named company is granted 

registration as a bulk manufacturer of 

the basic classes of controlled 

substances listed. 

Dated: November 1, 2010. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28533 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Manufacturer of Controlled 

Substances; Notice of Registration 

By Notice dated June 17, 2010, and 

published in the Federal Register on 

June 28, 2010, (75 FR 36683), Wildlife 

Laboratories, Inc., 1401 Duff Drive, 

Suite 400, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, 

made application by renewal to the 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

(DEA) to be registered as a bulk 

manufacturer of Carfentanil (9743), a 

basic class of controlled substance listed 

in schedule II. 

The company will manufacture the 

above listed controlled substance for 

sale to veterinary pharmacies, zoos, and 

for other animal and wildlife 

applications. 

No comments or objections have been 

received. DEA has considered the 

factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 

determined that the registration of 

Wildlife Laboratories, Inc. to 

manufacture the listed basic class of 

controlled substance is consistent with 

the public interest at this time. DEA has 

investigated Wildlife Laboratories, Inc. 

to ensure that the company’s 

registration is consistent with the public 

interest. The investigation has included 

inspection and testing of the company’s 

physical security systems, verification 

of the company’s compliance with state 

and local laws, and a review of the 

company’s background and history. 

Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), 

and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, 

the above named company is granted 

registration as a bulk manufacturer of 

the basic class of controlled substance 

listed. 

Dated: November 1, 2010. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28522 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Manufacturer of Controlled 

Substances; Notice of Registration 

By Notice dated March 16, 2010, and 

published in the Federal Register on 

March 24, 2010, (75 FR 14190), 

Archimica, Inc., 2460 W. Bennett Street, 

Springfield, Missouri 65807–1229, made 

application by letter to the Drug 

Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 

be registered as a bulk manufacturer of 

Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010), a 

basic class of controlled substance listed 

in schedule I. 

The company plans to manufacture 

the listed controlled substance in bulk 

for sale to its customers. 

One comment and objection was 

received. However, after a thorough 

review of this matter, DEA has 

concluded that the issues raised in the 

comment and objection do not warrant 

the denial of this application. 

DEA has considered the factors in 21 

U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the 

registration of Archimica, Inc., to 

manufacture the listed basic class of 

controlled substance is consistent with 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

69468 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices 

the public interest at this time. DEA has 

investigated Archimica, Inc. to ensure 

that the company’s registration is 

consistent with the public interest. The 

investigation has included inspection 

and testing of the company’s physical 

security systems, verification of the 

company’s compliance with state and 

local laws, and a review of the 

company’s background and history. 

Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, 

and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, 

the above named company is granted 

registration as a bulk manufacturer of 

the basic class of controlled substance 

listed. 

Dated: November 1, 2010. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28520 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–73,963] 

Dentek.com, D/B/A Nsequence Center 

for Advanced Dentistry; Reno, NV; 

Notice of Affirmative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration 

By application dated July 16, 2010, a 

petitioner requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was issued on June 

22, 2010. The Department’s Notice of 

Determination was published in the 

Federal Register on July 7, 2010 (75 FR 

39049). Workers are engaged in 

employment related to the production of 

dental prosthetics. 

The initial determination was based 

on the findings that worker separations 

are not attributable to increased imports 

of articles like or directly competitive 

with dental prosthetics or a shift/ 

acquisition of these articles to a foreign 

country by the workers’ firm. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioner provided additional 

information regarding company imports 

and operations. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

of Labor’s prior decision. The 

application is, therefore, granted. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of 

August, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28491 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–73,756] 

Progressive Furniture, Inc., Including 

On-Site Leased Workers From Onin 

Staffing, a Subsidiary of Sauder 

Furniture, Claremont, NC; Notice of 

Affirmative Determination Regarding 

Application for Reconsideration 

On July 19, 2010, the Department 

issued a determination regarding 

workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of the subject firm. The 

Department’s Notice of Determination 

was published in the Federal Register 

on August 6, 2010 (75 FR 47635). 

The initial investigation resulted in a 

negative determination based on the 

findings that there was no increase in 

imports or shift to/acquisition from a 

foreign country of decommissioning 

services by the workers’ firm, and that 

the workers’ firm did not produce an 

article or supply a service that was used 

by a firm with workers eligible to apply 

for TAA in the production of an article 

or supply of a service that was the basis 

for TAA-certification. 

Subsequent to the issuance of the 

negative determination, the Department 

was informed of a mistake in fact in the 

case at hand. 

Based on this new information, the 

Department has determined that it is 

appropriate for the Department to 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review, I conclude that 

a reconsideration of the U.S. 

Department of Labor’s prior decision is 

appropriate. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of 

August, 2010. 

Del Min Amy Chen, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28489 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–73,210; TA–W–73,210A] 

Metlife Moosic, PA, Metlife Clarks 

Summit, PA; Notice of Affirmative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated August 2, 2010, 

the petitioners requested administrative 

reconsideration of the negative 

determination regarding workers’ 

eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers 

and former workers of the subject firm. 

The determination was issued on July 

14, 2010, and the Department’s Notice 

of Determination was published in the 

Federal Register on August 2, 2010 (75 

FR 45163). 

The initial investigation resulted in a 

negative determination based on the 

findings that there was no increase in 

imports or acquisition from a foreign 

country of software testing and quality 

assurance services by the workers’ firm, 

and that the workers’ firm did not 

produce an article or supply a service 

that was used by a firm with workers 

eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (TAA) in the production of 

an article or supply of a service that was 

the basis for TAA-certification. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioners provided additional 

information alleging the procurement by 

the subject firm from foreign sources of 

services like and directly competitive 

with those produced by the petitioning 

workers. 

The Department has carefully 

reviewed the request for reconsideration 

and the existing record, and has 

determined that the Department will 

conduct further investigation to 

determine if the workers meet the 

eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 

of 1974, as amended. 

Conclusion 

After careful review of the 

application, I conclude that the claim is 

of sufficient weight to justify 

reconsideration of the U.S. Department 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES