Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules 4903 

(2) Right-hand MLG doors with S/Ns 1208 

through 1239 inclusive, 1241 through 1249 

inclusive, and 1251. 

(h) Repetitive Inspections of MLG Hinge and 

Nerve Areas 

For airplanes equipped with MLG door 

actuator fittings having P/N D52880224 000/ 

001 or D52880235 000/001: Within 400 flight 

cycles after the effective date of this AD, or 

before the accumulation of 9,000 total flight 

cycles since first flight of the airplane, 

whichever occurs later, perform an HFEC 

inspection of both hinge and nerve areas of 

the MLG doors for cracking, in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Airbus Service Bulletin A320–52–1096, 

Revision 02, dated July 12, 2006. Repeat the 

inspection thereafter at intervals not to 

exceed 800 flight cycles. 

(i) Inspections/Corrective Actions 

(1) If any cracking is found during any 

inspection required by paragraph (g) or (h) of 

this AD: Before further flight, replace the 

affected MLG door actuator fittings with new 

monoblock fittings, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus 

Service Bulletin A320–52–1073, Revision 05, 

dated September 28, 2006. Accomplishing 

this replacement terminates the repetitive 

inspections required by paragraphs (g) and 

(h) of this AD. 

(2) If, during any HFEC inspection required 

by paragraph (g) of this AD, no cracking is 

found: At the time specified in paragraph (g) 

of this AD, perform a low frequency eddy 

current (LFEC) inspection to determine the 

grain direction of the raw material of each 

MLG actuator fitting, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus 

Service Bulletin A320–52A1086, Revision 01, 

dated September 10, 1999. 

(i) If the grain direction of the raw material 

is correct, the repetitive inspections required 

by paragraph (g) of this AD may be 

terminated. 

(ii) If the grain direction of the raw material 

is incorrect, repeat the HFEC inspection 

required by paragraph (g) of this AD at the 

time specified in paragraph (g) of this AD. 

Replacement of the MLG door actuator 

fittings with new monoblock fittings as 

specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, 

terminates the repetitive inspections required 

by paragraphs (g) and (i) of this AD. 

(j) MLG Door Actuator Fitting Replacement 

For airplanes equipped with any MLG door 

actuator fitting having P/N D52880102000 

and P/N D52880102001, or P/N 

D52880220000 and P/N D52880220001, or P/ 

N D52880224000 and P/N D52880224001, or 

P/N D52880235000 and P/N D52880235001: 

At the later of the times specified in 

paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(2) of this AD, replace 

the MLG door actuator fittings with new 

monoblock fittings, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus 

Service Bulletin A320–52–1073, Revision 05, 

dated September 28, 2006. Accomplishing 

this replacement terminates the repetitive 

inspections required by paragraphs (g) and 

(h) of this AD. 

(1) Before the accumulation of 48,000 total 

flight cycles or 96,000 total flight hours, 

whichever occurs later since the first flight of 

the airplane; or 

(2) Within 30 days after the effective date 

of this AD. 

(k) Optional Terminating Action 

Replacement of the MLG door actuator 

fittings with new monoblock fittings, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320– 

52–1073, Revision 05, dated September 28, 

2006, terminates the repetitive inspections 

required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD. 

(l) Airplanes Excluded From AD 

Requirements 

For airplanes on which Airbus 

Modification 24903, 25372, or 36979 has 

been embodied in production, no action is 

required by this AD, provided that no MLG 

door actuator fitting having any part number 

identified in paragraph (j) of this AD has 

been reinstalled on the airplane since first 

flight. 

(m) Parts Installation Limitation 

As of the effective date of this AD, no 

person may install a MLG door actuator 

fitting having any part number identified in 

paragraph (j) of this AD on any airplane. 

(n) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

telephone 425–227–1405; fax 425–227–1149. 

Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116- 

AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using 

any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 

principal inspector, or lacking a principal 

inspector, the manager of the local flight 

standards district office/certificate holding 

district office. 

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer, the action must 

be accomplished using a method approved 

by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 

116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or 

the European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design 

Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by 

the DOA, the approval must include the 

DOA-authorized signature. 

(o) Related Information 

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European 

Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness 

Directive 2014–0166, dated July 16, 2014, for 

related information. This MCAI may be 

found in the AD docket on the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–0461. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness 

Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice 

Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; 

telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 

93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@

airbus.com; Internet http://www.airbus.com. 

You may view this service information at the 

FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 

20, 2016. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2016–01580 Filed 1–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–3994; Airspace 

Docket No. 15–ANM–23] 

Proposed Establishment of Class E 

Airspace, Shelton, WA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

establish Class E airspace at Sanderson 

Field Airport, Shelton, WA, to 

accommodate new Standard Instrument 

Approach Procedures developed at the 

airport. Controlled airspace is necessary 

for the safety and management of 

Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations 

at the airport. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before March 14, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 

366–9826. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2015–3994; Airspace 

Docket No. 15–ANM–23, at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office between 

9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

The Docket Office (telephone 1–800– 


wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
4904 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

647–5527), is on the ground floor of the 

building at the above address. 

FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, and 

subsequent amendments can be viewed 

online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/ 

publications/. For further information, 

you can contact the Airspace Policy 

Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 29591; 

telephone: 202–267–8783. The Order is 

also available for inspection at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of FAA 

Order 7400.9Z at NARA, call 202–741– 

6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/ 

federal_register/code_of_federalregulations/ibr_locations.html. 

FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steve Haga, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support 

Group, Western Service Center, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; 

telephone (425) 203–4563. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part, A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it would 

establish Class E airspace at Sanderson 

Field Airport, Shelton, WA. 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers and be submitted in 

triplicate to the address listed above. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this notice must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 

Docket No. FAA–2015–3994; Airspace 

Docket No. 15–ANM–23.’’ The postcard 

will be date/time stamped and returned 

to the commenter. 

Availability of NPRMs 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Recently published rulemaking 

documents can also be accessed through 

the FAA’s Web page at http://

www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_

traffic/publications/airspace_

amendments/. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received, and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see the 

ADDRESSES section for the address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined during 

normal business hours at the Northwest 

Mountain Regional Office of the Federal 

Aviation Administration, Air Traffic 

Organization, Western Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRMs should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory 

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 

Availability and Summary of 

Documents Proposed for Incorporation 

by Reference 

This document would amend FAA 

Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations 

and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 

2015, and effective September 15, 2015. 

FAA Order 7400.9Z is publicly available 

as listed in the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. FAA Order 7400.9Z lists 

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, 

air traffic service routes, and reporting 

points. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) Part 71 by establishing Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface at Sanderson 

Field Airport, Shelton, WA. 

Establishment of a GPS approach has 

made this action necessary for the safety 

and management of IFR operations at 

the airport. The Class E airspace area 

would be modified to a 4-mile radius of 

the Ed Carlson Memorial-South Lewis 

County Airport, with segments 

extending from the 4-mile radius to 5 

miles northeast of the airport, and 9.5 

miles southwest of the airport. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA 

Order 7400.9Z, dated August 6, 2015, 

and effective September 15, 2015, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1F, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Federal 

Aviation Administration proposes to 

amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 


wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 18 / Thursday, January 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules 4905 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 6, 2015, and 

effective September 15, 2015, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth. 

* * * * * 

ANM WA E5 Shelton, WA [New] 

Sanderson Field Airport, WA 

(Lat. 47°14′01′′ N., long. 1243°08′51′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 4-mile radius 

of the Sanderson Field Airport, and that 

airspace 1.5 miles either side of the 068° 

bearing from airport extending from the 4- 

mile radius to 5 miles northeast of the 

airport, and that airspace 2.3 miles either 

side of the 248° bearing from airport 

extending from the 4-mile radius to 9.5 miles 

southwest of the airport. 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on January 

15, 2016. 

Tracey Johnson, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Western 

Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2016–01503 Filed 1–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0366; FRL–9941–52– 

Region 5] 

Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Inver 

Hills SO2

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

revision to the Minnesota sulfur dioxide 

(SO2) State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

for Northern States Power Company’s 

Xcel Energy-Inver Hills Generating 

Plant, located in Inver Grove Heights, 

Minnesota. The revision, submitted by 

the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 

on May 1, 2015, incorporates a more 

stringent limit for the sulfur content of 

the fuel used at the facility, and 

modifies the fuel analysis requirements 

to meet the more stringent limit. These 

revisions will not result in an increase 

in SO2 emissions at the facility. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 29, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2015–0366 at http://

www.regulations.gov or via email to 

blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments 

submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. Once submitted, comments 

cannot be edited or removed from 

Regulations.gov. For either manner of 

submission, EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. EPA will generally not consider 

comments or comment contents located 

outside of the primary submission (i.e. 

on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing 

system). For additional submission 

methods, please contact the person 

identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the 

full EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Charles Hatten, Environmental 

Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6031, 

hatten.charles@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Final Rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving Minnesota’s 

SO2 SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If EPA does not receive adverse 

comments in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, EPA will 

withdraw the direct final rule and will 

address all public comments received in 

a subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. Please note 

that if EPA receives adverse comment 

on an amendment, paragraph, or section 

of this rule, and if that provision can be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. For additional 

information, see the direct final rule 

which is located in the Rules section of 

this Federal Register. 

Dated: January 13, 2016. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2016–01576 Filed 1–27–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0644; FRL–9941–66– 

Region 7] 

Approval of Missouri’s Air Quality 

Implementation Plans; Americold 

Logistics, LLC 24-Hour Particulate 

Matter (PM10) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS) Consent 

Judgment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

revision to the State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of 

Missouri on June 2, 2014. This proposed 

SIP revision will incorporate a consent 

judgment to address violations of the 

24-hour particulate matter (PM10) 

NAAQS near the Americold Logistics, 

LLC, Carthage Crushed Limestone (CCL) 

facility near Carthage, Missouri. CCL is 

a limestone quarry operations. The 

consent judgment between the State of 

Missouri and CCL includes measures 

that will control PM10 emissions from 

the facility. This proposed approval will 

make the consent judgment Federallyenforceable. 

DATES: Comments on this proposed 

action must be received in writing by 

February 29, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2015–0644, to http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 


wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS