alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1780.31 General. ( a ) Applicants are encouraged to contact the Agency processing office early in the planning stages of their project. Agency personnel are available to provide general advice and assistance regarding RUS programs, other funding sources, and types of systems or improvements appropriate for the applicants needs. The Agency can also provide access to technical assistance and other information resources for other project development issues such as public information, income surveys, developing rate schedules, system operation and maintenance, and environmental compliance requirements. Throughout the planning, application processing and construction of the project, Agency personnel will work closely and cooperatively with the applicant and their representatives, other State and Federal agencies and technical assistance providers.
( b ) The processing office will handle initial inquiries and provide basic information about the program. They are to provide the application, SF 424.2, “Application for Federal Assistance (For Construction),” assist applicants as needed in completing SF 424.2, and in filing a request for intergovernmental review. Federally recognized Indian tribes are exempt from intergovernmental review. The processing office will explain eligibility requirements and meet with the applicant whenever necessary to discuss application processing.
( c ) Applicants can make a written request for an eligibility determination in lieu of filing an SF 424.2 along with the information required by § 1780.33. Applicants seeking only an eligibility determination, should contact the processing office to obtain a list of the items needed to make this determination. An eligibility determination for loan or grant assistance will not give an applicant priority for funding as set forth in § 1780.17.
( d ) Applications that are not developed in a reasonable period of time taking into account the size and complexity of the proposed project may be removed from the State's active file. Applicants will be consulted prior to taking such action.
( e ) During the earliest discussion with prospective applicants, the Agency will advise prospective applicants on environmental review requirements and evaluation of potential environmental impacts of the proposal. In accordance with 7 CFR part 1970, environmental review requirements shall be performed by the applicant simultaneously and concurrently with the proposal's engineering planning and design.
[62 FR 33478, June 19, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 68655, Dec. 11, 1998; 81 FR 11028, Mar. 2, 2016]
§ 15a.415 Access to course offerings. ( a ) A recipient shall not provide any course or otherwise carry out any of its education program or activity separately on the basis of sex, or require or refuse participation therein by any of its students on such basis, including health, physical education, industrial, business, vocational, technical, home economics, music, and adult education courses.
( b ) ( 1 ) With respect to classes and activities in physical education at the elementary school level, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than one year from the effective date of these regulations. With respect to physical education classes and activities at the secondary and post-secondary levels, the recipient shall comply fully with this section as expeditiously as possible but in no event later than three years from the effective date of these regulations.
( 2 ) This section does not prohibit grouping of students in physical education classes and activities by ability as assessed by objective standards of individual performance developed and applied without regard to sex.
( 3 ) This section does not prohibit separation of students by sex within physical education classes or activities during participation in wrestling, boxing, rugby, ice hockey, football, basketball, and other sports the purpose or major activity of which involves bodily contact.
( 4 ) Where use of a single standard of measuring skill or progress in a physical education class has an adverse effect on members of one sex, the recipient shall use appropriate standards that do not have such effect.
( 5 ) Portions of classes in elementary and secondary schools, or portions of education programs or activities, that deal exclusively with human sexuality may be conducted in separate sessions for boys and girls.
( 6 ) Recipients may make requirements based on vocal range or quality that may result in a chorus or choruses of one or predominantly one sex.
Order entered November 14, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01066-CV

SHELLY MARIE TRIGG, Appellant

V.

CHRISTOPHER DUNBAR, AS TRUSTEE OF THE 

CHRIS AND PAIGE DUNBAR FAMILY TRUST, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-01748-2019

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 13, 2019 unopposed second motion for an 

extension of time to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to 

December 9, 2019. We caution appellant that further extension requests in this accelerated 

appeal will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
# m ^ ^ C I T Y O F,



# KlRKSVJLL

E Ma y 18 , 201 0 Administratio n660.627.122 5 • Huma nResource s 660.627.145 8 Economi c & Communit y Developmen t 660.627.122 4

Denni s DeVany , Chie f Essentia l Ai rServic e & Domesti cAnalysi s Departmen t o f Transportation , Roo m 640 1 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S.E . <; > Washington , D

C 2059 0 ^_ ^ Dea rMr . DeVany : Th e Kirksvill e Cit yCouncil recommend s Cap e Air , Incorporated , t o serv e as th e essentia l ai rcarrie ra t th e Kirksvill e Regiona l Airpor t fo rth e 201 0 contract . W e woul d appreciat e th e Departmen t o f Transportation' s consideratio n o f ou rrecommendation . Tw o ou t o f th e fou rcarrier s wh o submitte d proposal s currentl ylac k necessar

yelement s fo rsufficien t service . Pleas e le t u s kno wi f yo u hav e an yquestions . Sincerely , Tod d Kuhn s Mayo r

20 1 S . Frankli n• Kirksville , Missour i 6350 1

Tol l Free : 888.299.122 3 • Fax : 660.665.094 0 •www.kirksvillecity.co m
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6791

DENNIS RAY GRAVES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, in re: Montgomery County Circuit Court, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-01-250-7) Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: July 5, 2001 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Ray Graves, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Dennis Ray Graves, a Virginia inmate, appeals two district court orders, the first dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 2000) for failure to state a claim, and the second denying his motion for reconsideration of the first order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Graves v. Supreme Court of Virginia , No. CA-01- 250-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2001 & May 7, 2001). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1780.15 Other Federal, State, and local requirements. Proposals for facilities financed in whole or in part with RUS funds will be coordinated with appropriate Federal, State and local agencies. If there are conflicts between this part and State or local laws or regulatory commission regulations, the provisions of this part will control. Applicants will be required to comply with Federal, State, and local laws and any regulatory commission rules and regulations pertaining to: ( a ) Organization of the applicant and its authority to own, construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities;
( b ) Borrowing money, giving security therefore, and raising revenues for the repayment thereof;
( c ) Land use zoning; and
( d ) Health and sanitation standards and design and installation standards unless an exception is granted by RUS.
#### JAGER, Respondent, v. GOLDMANN-SCHWEISHEIMER CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

September 28, 1906.)

Action by Adolf Jager against the Goldmann-Schweisheimer Company.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municipal Court unanimously affirmed, with costs.
§ 1780.10 Limitations. ( a ) Loan and grant funds may not be used to finance: ( 1 ) Facilities which are not modest in size, design, and cost;
( 2 ) Loan or grant finder's fees;
( 3 ) The construction of any new combined storm and sanitary sewer facilities;
( 4 ) Any portion of the cost of a facility which does not serve a rural area;
( 5 ) That portion of project costs normally provided by a business or industrial user, such as wastewater pretreatment, etc.;
( 6 ) Rental for the use of equipment or machinery owned by the applicant;
( 7 ) For other purposes not directly related to operating and maintenance of the facility being installed or improved; and
( 8 ) A judgment which would disqualify an applicant for a loan or grant as provided for in § 1780.7(g).
( b ) Grant funds may not be used to: ( 1 ) Reduce EDU costs to a level less than similar system cost;
( 2 ) Pay any costs of a project when the median household income of the service area is more than 100 percent of the nonmetropolitan median household income of the State;
( 3 ) Pay project costs when other loan funding for the project is not at reasonable rates and terms; and
( 4 ) Pay project costs when other funding is a guaranteed loan obtained in accordance with 7 CFR part 1779 of this title.
( c ) Grants may not be made in excess of the following percentages of the RUS eligible project development costs. Facilities previously installed will not be considered in determining the development costs. ( 1 ) 75 percent when the median household income of the service area is below the higher of the poverty line or 80% of the state nonmetropolitan median income and the project is necessary to alleviate a health or sanitary problem.
( 2 ) 45 percent when the median household income of the service area exceeds the 80 percent requirements described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section but is not more than 100 percent of the statewide nonmetropolitan median household income.
( 3 ) Applicants are advised that the percentages contained in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section are maximum amounts and may be further limited due to availability of funds or the grant determination procedures contained in § 1780.35 (b).
[62 FR 33478, June 19, 1997, as amended at 64 FR 29946, June 4, 1999; 66 FR 23151, May 8, 2001]
EXHIBIT (21)

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT





Registrant owns 100% of the outstanding stock of each of the following corporations:



|                                             |  |                       
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name                                         |  | State of Incorporation
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company of Ohio       |  | Ohio                  
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville-Atlantic Insurance Company      |  | Georgia               
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company of New Jersey |  | New Jersey            
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Preferred Insurance Company     |  | Pennsylvania          
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Lake States Insurance Company   |  | Michigan              
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company               |  | Pennsylvania          
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company of New York   |  | New York              
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company     |  | Pennsylvania          
|                                             |  |
Gerald DuPont Enterprises, Inc.
                           Petroleum Engineer
                             P.O. Box 1590
                       Sugar Land, TX  77487-1590

                  (281) 240-2822  FAX  (281) 242-2822



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Gerald W. DuPont Enterprises, Inc. consents to the incorporation by
reference of our evaluation of the estimated reserves and future net
revenues of certain interests owned by Blue Dolphin Energy Company in
the Galveston Block 288 Field, dated December 31, 1997, included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blue Dolphin Energy Company for the
year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ Gerald W. DuPont
Petroleum Engineer

February 18, 1998
§ 1773.32 Reports on internal control; compliance with provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements; and instances of fraud. ( a ) As required by GAGAS, the auditor must prepare a written report describing the scope of the auditor's testing of internal control over financial reporting and of compliance with provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, and that the tests provided sufficient, appropriate evidence to support opinions on the effectiveness of internal control and on compliance with provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements. This report must include the manual, printed or digital signature of the audit firm and must include the following items as appropriate: ( 1 ) Significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control;
( 2 ) Instances of fraud and noncompliance with provisions of laws or regulations that have a material effect on the audit and any other instances that warrant the attention of those charged with governance;
( 3 ) Noncompliance with provisions of contracts or grant agreements that have a material effect on the audit; and
( 4 ) Abuse that has a material effect on the audit.
( b ) When the auditor detects instances of noncompliance or abuse that have an effect on the financial statements that are less than material but warrant the attention of those charged with governance, they should communicate those findings in writing to those charged with governance in a separate communication. If the auditor has issued a separate communication detailing immaterial instances of noncompliance or abuse, the reports on internal control; compliance with provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements; and instances of fraud must be modified to include a statement such as: “We noted certain immaterial instances of noncompliance [and/or abuse], which we have reported to the management of (auditee's name) in a separate letter dated (month, day, 20XX).”
( c ) If the auditor has issued a separate letter to management to communicate other matters involving the design and operation of the internal control over financial reporting, the reports on internal control; compliance with provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements; and instances of fraud must be modified to include a statement such as: “However, we noted other matters involving the internal control over financial reporting that we have reported to the management of (auditee's name) in a separate letter dated (month, day, 20XX).”
( d ) The report must contain the status of known but uncorrected deficiencies from prior audits that affect the current audit objective.
[83 FR 19907, May 7, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 7565, Feb. 6, 2023]
EXHIBIT
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Jpak Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yongbo
Wang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                           
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (2) | The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as
    of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented in this report.





|Date: March
    6, 2012 |  | /s/ Yongbo
    Wang     | 
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------- | 
|                        |  | Yongbo (Esther) Wang    | 
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer |
§ 1717.161 Application process. ( a ) Borrowers are responsible for ensuring that their applications for RUS approval of a merger are complete and sound in form and substance when they are submitted to RUS. After submitting an application, borrowers shall promptly notify RUS of any changes or events that materially affect the application or any information in the application.
( b ) In reviewing borrower requests for approval of mergers, RUS will consider the likely effects of the action on the ability of the successor to provide reliable electric service at reasonable cost to RE Act beneficiaries and on the security of outstanding RUS loans. Among the factors RUS will consider are whether the proposed merger is likely to: ( 1 ) Contribute to greater operating efficiency and financial soundness;
( 2 ) Mitigate high electric rates and or rate disparity;
( 3 ) Help borrowers to diversify their loads or otherwise hedge risks;
( 4 ) Have beneficial effects on rural economic development in the community served by the borrower, such as diversifying the economic base or alleviating unemployment; and
( 5 ) Provide other benefits consistent with the purposes of the RE Act.
( c ) RUS will not approve a merger if, in the sole judgment of the Administrator, such action is likely to have an adverse effect on the credit quality of outstanding loans made or guaranteed by the Government. RUS will thoroughly review each request for approval of such action, including review of the feasibility and security of outstanding Government loans according to the standards in 7 CFR 1710.112 and 1710.113, respectively, and in other RUS regulations.
( d ) RUS will keep the borrowers apprised of the progress of their applications.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2021

a0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2021

162291

HUTCHINSON FLUID MANAGEMENT

SYSTEMS, INC., a/k/a NEW FAYETTE, INC.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 162291

COA: 351647

Hillsdale CC: 19

- 000557

- CH

DH HOLDINGS CORPORATION,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

DANAHER CORPORATION and FTP

EUROPE LTD,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 15, 2020

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be re viewed by this Court.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard A. RappaportRichard
      A. RappaportPrincipal
      Executive OfficerJuly
      26, 2010
§ 1738.102 Payment assistance for loans. ( a ) Grant funding may also be used to provide assistance to Title VI Awardees in the form of subsidized loans at such rates as the Agency will issue from time to time by notice in the Federal Register, or in the form of a payment assistance loan, which shall require no interest and principal payments or require nominal periodic payments as determined by the Agency and published in the Federal Register.
( b ) Subsidized loans shall only be available to projects which will serve rural areas lacking access to service with speeds of at least 10 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream and meets any one of the priorities set forth in § 1738.105(a)(3)(i).
( c ) The Agency may determine, at its sole discretion, to provide a payment assistance loan which shall require no interest and principal payments or such nominal payments as the Secretary determines to be appropriate. Such loans will only be provided to projects which will serve rural areas lacking access to service of speeds of 10 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream and meets any two of the priorities set forth in § 1738.105(a)(3)(i). When considering the authority to provide a payment assistance loan, the Agency will consider how such assistance will: ( 1 ) Improve the Applicant's compliance with the commitments of the Agency's standard Award agreement, in addition to any additional requirements imposed by the Agency specific to the project;
( 2 ) Promote the completion of the broadband project;
( 3 ) Protect taxpayer resources; and
( 4 ) Support the integrity of the Agency's broadband programs.
( d ) The Agency and recipients of payment assistance loans must agree to specific milestones and objectives for the project which must be met, in addition to the other requirements of this part. Such terms may be amended by mutual agreement for good cause. Failure to meet the agreed upon terms, upon the Agency's determination that such failure was a direct result of the Awardee's own actions, may result in the Agency's request to the return of all, or any portion, of the grant funds used for the payment assistance loan.
( e ) Additionally, Applicants with an associated loan under Title I and Title II of the RE Act and which are seeking any grant assistance under this part, are not eligible for a subsidized loan or payment assistance loans.