alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content 
An official website of the Department of Health & Human ServicesMore            BackSearch ahrq.gov-  Menu-  Search All AHRQ SitesCareersContact UsEspañolFAQs
                            Email UpdatesFont Size: Search MEPSSMLXL Search ResultsThe components in this navigation bar are fully operational with or without the use of JavaScript** MEPS Home**** About MEPS ****** **::** Survey Background **::** Workshops & Events **::** Data Release Schedule** Survey Components ****** **::** Household **::** Insurance/Employer **::** Medical Provider **::** Survey Questionnaires Data and Statistics ************ **::** Data Overview  **::** MEPS Topics  **::** Publications Search **::** MEPS Data Tools (HC/IC) **::** Data Files **::** Data        Centers** Communication****** **::** What's New  **::** Mailing List **::** Discussion Forum **::** Participants' Corner **Search Results**printer-friendly **Search Criteria****Publication type:** Methodology Reports**Search again**Select a title to see the publication details; select a column heading to sort the list. Notes              on viewing and downloading filesPrinting              tips **Results: 37**Title****Pub. type & no.** **Year**Component**File type**Outpatient Prescription Drugs: Collection and Editing in the 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel SurveyMethodology Report            372024Household ComponentPDF(768 KB)**********
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1709 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1709

To authorize the Attorney General to award grants to eligible entities 
  to prevent or alleviate community violence by providing education, 
mentoring, and counseling services to children, adolescents, teachers, 
   families, and community leaders on the principles and practice of 
                              nonviolence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2013

  Mr. Lewis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Attorney General to award grants to eligible entities 
  to prevent or alleviate community violence by providing education, 
mentoring, and counseling services to children, adolescents, teachers, 
   families, and community leaders on the principles and practice of 
                              nonviolence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing American Families by 
Educating and Training Youth (SAFETY) Through Nonviolence Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS TO EDUCATE AMERICANS ABOUT THE PRINCIPLES OF 
              NONVIOLENCE.

    (a) Grants.--The Attorney General may make grants to eligible 
entities to prevent or alleviate the effects of community violence by 
providing education, mentoring, and counseling to youth regarding the 
principles and application of nonviolence in conflict resolution.
    (b) Priority.--In awarding grants under this section, the Attorney 
General shall give priority to applicants that agree to use the grant 
in 1 or more eligible urban, rural, Tribal, and suburban communities 
that can certify--
            (1) an increase in community, especially youth violence; 
        and
            (2) lack the monetary or other resources to address 
        violence prevention.
    (c) Limitation.--The Attorney General may not make a grant to an 
eligible entity under this section unless the entity agrees to use not 
more than 40 percent of such grant for nonviolence-prevention education 
and program development.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section, the term ``eligible entity'' 
means a State or local government entity, educational institution, 
nonprofit, or faith-based organization.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--To carry out this section, 
there is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of the 
fiscal years from 2014 through 2019.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50915 USDC No. EP-97-CV-200-F

SANTIAGO DELGADO MEDRANO, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

--------------------- March 2, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: Santiago Delgado Medrano seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) from the denial of his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. COA is GRANTED and the case is VACATED AND REMANDED for further proceedings. Clark v. Williams , 693 F.2d 381, 382 (5th Cir. 1982). The district court erred in determining that Medrano had failed to exhaust his state remedies on his claims that he was denied a speedy trial and the right to be present at a critical stage of trial given that he presented them on direct review toO R D E R No. 97-50915 -2- the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Richardson v. Procunier , 762 F.2d 427, 429, 431-32 (5th Cir. 1982). On remand, the district court should afford Medrano the opportunity to file an amended petition deleting his remaining two unexhausted claims. See Rose v. Lundy , 455 U.S. 509, 520 (1982); McGruder v. Phelps , 608 F.2d 1023, 1025 (5th Cir. 1979). COA GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer****Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended **June 30, 2007**(the“Report”) of **Patriot Capital Funding, Inc.**(the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, **Richard P. Buckanavage,**the Chief Executive Officer andPresident of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and      (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.         /s/ Richard P. Buckanavage   Name:  Richard P. Buckanavage   Date: August 7, 2007
#### § 1700.27 Chief of Staff.

The Chief of Staff aids and assists the Administrator and the Deputy Administrator. The Chief of Staff advises the Administrator regarding policy initiatives and operational issues and assists the Administrator and the Deputy Administrator in developing and planning agency program initiatives. The Chief of Staff is responsible for implementation of overall policy initiatives and provides direction to all RUS programs.

[71 FR 8436, Feb. 17, 2006]
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0228 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-216-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 2013-0251

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

Yes Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes,

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published 

NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

A330-27-3195, R01 --- 2/6/14

A340-27-4188, R01 --- 2/6/14

A340-27-5059, R01 --- 2/6/14

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 
Page 2 of 3

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. DRUMMOND.

No. 11958.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 8, 1954.

Geo. J. Bott, A. Norman Somers,: Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Miller, Searl & Fitch, Portsmouth, Ohio, for respondent.

Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. ,

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been heard and considered by the Court on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the. opinion that, for jurisdictional purpos-.i es, the operations of respondent’s Ports-mouth, Ohio, store were not to be considered as something separate and apart from the other stores owned and op-, erated by the respondent under a central management, N. L. R. B. v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co., 9 Cir., 132 F.2d 234, 235; that in any event jurisdiction under the Act does not depend upon whether the volume of commerce is large or small, N. L. R. B. v. Niles FireBrick Co., 6 Cir., 124 F.2d 366, 368, N. L. R. B. v. J. L. Hudson Co., 6 Cir., 135 F.2d 380, certiorari denied 320 U.S. 740, 64 S.Ct. 40, 88 L.Ed. 439; and that the Board was not in error in assuming jurisdiction in this case;

And that the Board’s finding that the Respondent interfered with or coerced its employees in the right to self organization and refused to bargain with the charging union on June 7, 1951 is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, and is not erroneous as a matter of law, Atlas Underwear Co. v. N. L. R. B., 6 Cir., 116 F.2d 1020, 1023; Joy Silk Mills, Inc., v. N. L. R. B., 87 *829U.S.App.D.C. 360, 185 F.2d 732, 741-742, certiorari denied 341 U.S. 914, 71 S.Ct. 734, 95 L.Ed. 1350; N. L. R. B. v. Kobritz, 1 Cir., 193 F.2d 8, 14; N. L. R. B. v. Porcelain Steels, Inc., 6 Cir., 138 F.2d 840.

It is ordered that the National Labor Relations Board’s Order of January 27, 1953 be enforced.
#### § 170.9 What type of information does the application require?

The application for participation in the USDA Farmers Market will provide market management with information on contacts, farm location, type of farming operation, types of products grown, and business practices, including insurance coverage.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Making Healthy Choices: A Guide on Psychotropic Medications for Youth in Foster Care      

# Making Healthy Choices: A Guide on Psychotropic Medications for Youth in Foster Care

This resource from the Children’s Bureau  provides information to youth in foster care on psychotropic medication, and the role they can have in their overall health care, as well as alternate approaches to treatment.

https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/makinghealthychoices.pdf
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Yale Farar                                         |   |   |   |
| Yale                Farar                              |   |   |        |
| President                (Principal Executive Officer) |   |   |   |
| August 17, 2007                                        |   |   |   |

|                              |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Mitchell W. Turk              |   |   |   |
| Mitchell                  W. Turk |   |   |        |
| Chief Financial Officer           |   |   |   |
| August 17, 2007                   |   |   |   |
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

  Hawaii

> - Honolulu
- Honolulu (Waipahu)

----
## Other Youth Topics

## Breadcrumb

            -  Youth Topics 
            -  Opportunity Youth 
            -  Performance Partnership Pilots for Disconnected Youth (P3) 
            -           Background      

# Background

In this section, learn about the history of Performance Partnership Pilots for Disconnected Youth. Read the **Consultation Paper**, watch archived **presentations**, see the original **shared goals** and **request for information** drafts, and read a **blog** cross-posted from the U.S. Department on Education on the genesis of P3.

## Re-Connect Menu

-  Overview 
-  Evaluation 
-  Round 5 (FY 2021) 
-  Round 4 (FY 2018 and FY 2019) 
-  Round 3 (FY 2016) 
-  Round 2 (FY 2015) 
-  Round 1 (FY 2014) 
-  Background    -  Consultation Paper 
  -  Presentations 
  -  Shared Goal Statement (Draft) 
  -  Request for Information on Strategies (Draft) 
  -  ED Blog Post (2014)
Exhibit (10)(Z)(1)

List of Executive Officers who are parties to

Change in Control Agreements with Harleysville Group Inc.

in the form filed as Exhibit (10)(Z) with the Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the year ended December 31, 2006



Michael L. Browne, President and Chief Executive Officer (1)

Mark R. Cummins, Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer

Allan R. Becker, Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary

Arthur E. Chandler, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thomas E. Clark, Senior Vice President, Field Operations

Donna M. Dever, Senior Vice President, Performance Excellence (2)

Robert A. Kauffman, Senior Vice President, Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Governance Officer

Theodore A. Majewski, Senior Vice President, Personal Lines (3)

Kevin M. Toth, Senior Vice President, Claims

Akhil Tripathi, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Robert G. Whitlock Jr., Senior Vice President & Chief Underwriting Officer



_________________

(1)

Mr. Brownes agreement is substantially similar to the agreement with other executives except for the following:  (a) the factor in Section 4(c)(ii)(b) is 2.999 instead of 2.000; (b) the period in (i) the last proviso to Section 1, (ii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3, (iii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3(c), and (iv) Section 4(c)(vii) is thirty-six (36) months instead of twenty-four months; (c) the Initial Expiration Date is December 31, 2009, instead of December 31, 2007; and (d) in Section 1, the date January 1, 2008 is January 1, 2010.



(2)

The Company entered into this agreement in February 2007.



(3)

Mr. Majewskis agreement has the following differences:  (a) the factor in Section 4(c)(ii)(b) is 1.000 instead of 2.000; and (b) the period in (i) the last proviso to Section 1, (ii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3, (iii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3(c), and (iv) Section 4(c)(vii) is twelve (12) months instead of twenty-four months.  The agreement also provided for a continuation in salary and benefits for twelve months following any termination of his employment by the Company, other than for cause, occurring prior to December 31, 2006, unless a change in control had previously occurred.
§ 1744.64 Budget adjustment. ( a ) If more funds are required than are available in a budget account, the borrower may request RUS's approval of a budget adjustment to use funds from another account. The request shall include an explanation of the change, the budget account to be used, and a description of how the adjustment will affect loan purposes. RUS will not approve a budget adjustment that affects other loan purposes unless the borrower satisfies RUS that the additional funds are available from another source, requests a deficiency loan, or scales back the project.
( b ) RUS may make a budget adjustment without a formal request by the borrower when a budget account is insufficient to encumber funds for a contract that otherwise would be approved by RUS. See 7 CFR part 1753.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 15, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 15, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0441. THOMAS BIANCO v. KIMBERLY RODMAN.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16FM8520
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFree-field propagation of high intensity noiseObserved spectral data from supersonic jet aircraft are known to contain much more high frequency energy than can be explained by linear acoustic propagation theory. It is believed that the high frequency energy is an effect of nonlinear distortion due to the extremely high acoustic levels generated by the jet engines. The objective, to measure acoustic waveform distortion for spherically diverging high intensity noise, was reached by using an electropneumatic acoustic source capable of generating sound pressure levels in the range of 140 to 160 decibels (re 20 micro Pa). The noise spectrum was shaped to represent the spectra generated by jet engines. Two microphones were used to capture the acoustic pressure waveform at different points along the propagation path in order to provide a direct measure of the waveform distortion as well as spectral distortion. A secondary objective was to determine that the observed distortion is an acoustic effect. To do this an existing computer prediction code that deals with nonlinear acoustic propagation was used on data representative of the measured data. The results clearly demonstrate that high intensity jet noise does shift the energy in the spectrum to the higher frequencies along the propagation path. In addition, the data from the computer model are in good agreement with the measurements, thus demonstrating that the waveform distortion can be accounted for with nonlinear acoustic theory.Document ID19900012288Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWelz, Joseph P.*(Pennsylvania State Univ. State College, PA, United States)*Mcdaniel, Oliver H.*(Pennsylvania State Univ. State College, PA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186577NAS 1.26:186577Accession Number90N21604Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-4Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900012288.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024