alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

The State ofConnecticut and

Algonquin Power Windsor Locks, LLC

)

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement and Order No. 8261

Modification No.2

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Algonquin Power

Windsor Locks, LLC ("Respondent") having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 8261 and all previous modifications thereto, do now, by mutual

agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

I. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-174-22(d)(l) through 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies ("Regulations") are

hereby replaced with May 1,2010.

2. Any references to October I st with respect to the date by which the Respondent shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits ("DERCs") and/or

allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009.

3. Any references to May 31,2007 and May 31, 2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31,

2010.

4. All references to September I, 2008 with respect to the submission of Future

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September 1,2009.

5. No later than May 1,20 I0, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 8261 and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent

shall comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations.

6. All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8261, as modified,

shall remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street _ Hartford, CT 06106-5127

www.ct.gov/dep

An Equal Opporrunity Employer
..

Algonquin Power Windsor Locks, LLC 2 Trading Agreement and

Order No. 8261

Modification No.2

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

A.lgOnqUin pow~ w~n4JLocks, LLC

Signature: _

Name: Jr:m. ...., 4, IU ,<- ( nr

Title: _----'~_<.-_,q,v'-~_'__M_,I/-;_-.l_P4_C"_Y- _

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order.

G~r"!!os«)

DIrector

Engineering and Enforcement Division

Bureau of Air Management

Date

.. .._... -
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. MUSKETT.

No. 11158.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 5, 1954.

Decided Feb. 17, 1954.

Louis Schwartz, Washington, D. C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Myron S. Waks, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner.

Harry Fischer, Philadelphia, Pa. (Edwin Fischer, Bernard A. Fischer, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for enforcement of an order made by the National Labor Relations Board against the respondent. The Board’s findings of fact are fully supported by the record. The fact that respondent interfered with the rights of employees under the Act because he was angry at them does not excuse him, Gullett Gin Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 1950, 179 F.2d 499. And the remedy to be applied for violations is in the hands of the Board subject only to our correction when we think the limits of law and discretion have been exceeded. We do not so find it here. Petition for enforcement will be granted subject to the modification made necessary by the fact that one of the discharged employees has, subsequently been reinstated.
**EXHIBIT 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-120040 on Form S-3and Registration Statement Nos. 333-116896, 333-116894, 333-118055, 333-58832, 333-58836, and333-58840 on Form S-8 of our reports dated April 2, 2007, relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement schedule of UTi Worldwide Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinionand includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standards No. 123R, *Share-Based Payment*) and management’s report on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of UTiWorldwide Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2007./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
§ 15b.8 Remedial action, voluntary action, and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* ( 1 ) If the Secretary finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of handicap in violation of section 504 or this part, the recipient shall take such remedial action as the Secretary deems necessary to overcome the effects of the discrimination.
( 2 ) Where a recipient is found to have discriminated against persons on the basis of handicap in violation of section 504 or this part and where another recipient exercises control over the recipient that has discriminated, the Secretary, where appropriate, may require either or both recipients to take remedial action.
( 3 ) The Secretary may, where necessary to overcome the effects of discrimination in violation of section 504 or this part, require a recipient to take remedial action ( i ) with respect to handicapped persons who are no longer participants in the recipient's program or activity but who were participants in the program when such discrimination occurred or
( ii ) with respect to handicapped persons who would have been participants in the program or activity had the discrimination not occurred, or
( iii ) with respect to handicapped persons presently in the program or activity, but not receiving full benefits or equal and integrated treatment within the program.
( b ) *Voluntary action.* A recipient may take steps, in addition to any action that is required by this part, to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in the recipient's program or activity by qualified handicapped persons.
( c ) *Self-evaluation.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall, within one year of the effective date of this part: ( i ) Evaluate, with the assistance of interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, its current policies and practices and the effects thereof that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part.
( ii ) Modify, after consultation with interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, any policies and practices that do not meet the requirements of this part; and
( iii ) Take, after consultation with interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted from adherence to these policies and practices.
( 2 ) A recipient shall, for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, maintain on file, make available for public inspection, and provide to the Secretary upon request: ( i ) A list of the interested persons consulted,
( ii ) a description of areas examined and any problems identified, and
( iii ) a description of any modifications made and of any remedial steps taken.
[47 FR 25470, June 11, 1982, as amended at 68 FR 51342, Aug. 26, 2003]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Web article      

# Web article

Five Things to Know About Teen Parents and How to Help Them

Bright Idea: Everything You Need to Know About Helping Homeless Youth Apply for Medicaid

  Subscribe to Web article
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v Miguel Gonzalez, Defendant.

Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, this court adheres to its determination contained in the order entered on February 26, 1980. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Fein, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of
INTELLIGENTIAS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ian Rice, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I,
Lewis W. Moorehead, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Ian Rice

Ian
Rice

Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2007





/s/ Lewis W. Moorehead

Lewis W. Moorehead

Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2007
#### § 1710.206 [Reserved]
Management Brief u Health Services Research & Development Service u No. 4, July, 2002 

***********************************************************************

MANAGEMENT BRIEF provides VA senior management 

with a timely and concise summary of an 

important HSR&D finding or publication.

*********************************************************************** 

(Please forward this information to other interested parties) 

Medical Care Highlights VA’s Community-Based Outpatient 

Clinics 

The July issue of Medical Care features five HSR&D studies of VA’s fast growing 

Community-Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs). A team of HSR&D investigators was 

charged with evaluating key aspects of the CBOCs and then comparing the services 

CBOCs provide with the same services provided at VA medical centers. The 

researchers focused on: access to care, quality of care, utilization, patient satisfaction, 

and cost. Findings show that: patients in CBOCs perceive fewer problems with 

access and timeliness of care (eg, shorter waiting times) than do traditional VA clinic 

patients; CBOCs provide a similar level of quality of care as VAMCs in regard to 

prevention and disease detection; and total costs of care for veteran patients at 

CBOCs are lower compared to costs of care for patients treated in VAMCs. There 

were some areas in which CBOCs did not appear to perform as well as VAMCs. For 

example, CBOC patients had more visits with their primary care provider, but few 

specialty visits. This may warrant further investigation. 

Chapko MK, Borowsky SJ, Fortney JC, Hedeen AH, Hoegle M, Maciejewski ML, Lukas 

CV. Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Community-Based Outpatient Clinics. 

Medical Care July 2002;40(7):555-560. 

Fortney JC, Borowsky SJ, Hedeen AN, Maciejewski ML, Chapko MK. VA CommunityBased Outpatient Clinics: Access and utilization performance measures. Medical Care July 

2002;40(7):561-569. 

Hedeen AN, Heagerty PJ, Fortney JC, Borowsky SJ, Walder DJ, Chapko MK. VA 

Community-Based Outpatient Clinics: Quality of performance measures. Medical Care July 

2002;40(7):570-577. 

Borowsky SJ, Nelson D, Fortney JC, Hedeen AN, Bradley J, Chapko MK. VA CommunityBased Outpatient Clinics: Performance Measures based on patient perceptions of care. 

Medical Care July 2002;40(7):578-586. 

Maciejewski ML, Chapko MK, Hedeen AN, Fortney JC. VA Community-Based Outpatient 

Clinics: Cost performance measures. Medical Care July 2002;40(7):587-595. 

This research was funded through the VA's Under Secretary's Office.

________________________________________________________________________ 
MANAGEMENT BRIEF is produced by the Management Decision and Research Center, a 

program within VA’s Office of Research & Development, Health Services Research & 

Development Service. Please take a moment to give us your thoughts and suggestions 

about Management Brief by sending us an e-mail at MDRC.Boston@med.va.gov.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-51078 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO MENDOZA-VERA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-333-1

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Antonio MendozaVera raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense, and by United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517), and its progeny, which held that unpreserved claims based on United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct.No. 04-51078 -2- 738 (2005), are reviewed for plain error. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 68823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28267]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State Class III Gaming Amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes approval of the Amendments to the Class 
III Gaming Compact (Amendment) between the State of Oregon and the 
Siletz Indians of Oregon.

DATES: Effective Date: November 9, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240; telephone (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA) Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. This Amendment allows for multi-
player games on video lottery terminals (VLTs).

    Dated: November 1, 2010.
Larry Echo Hawk,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2010-28267 Filed 11-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1835 

To provide that service of the members of the organization known as the 

United States Cadet Nurse Corps during World War II constituted 

active military service for purposes of laws administered by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2013 

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself, Mrs. CAPPS, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. 

CONNOLLY, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. LANCE, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. POLIS, and 

Mr. SCHIFF) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on 

Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that service of the members of the organization 

known as the United States Cadet Nurse Corps during 

World War II constituted active military service for purposes of laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Cadet 

5 Nurse Corps Equity Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1835 IH

1 SEC. 2. SERVICE DEEMED TO BE ACTIVE MILITARY SERV2 ICE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of section 

4 401(a)(1)(A) of the GI Bill Improvement Act of 1977 (38 

5 U.S.C. 106 note), the Secretary of Defense is deemed to 

6 have determined that qualified service of a person con7 stituted active military service. 

8 (b) DETERMINATION OF DISCHARGE STATUS.—The 

9 Secretary of Defense shall issue an honorable discharge 

10 under section 401(a)(1)(B) of the GI Bill Improvement 

11 Act of 1977 to each person whose qualified service war12 rants an honorable discharge. Such discharge shall be 

13 issued before the end of the one-year period beginning on 

14 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

15 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF RETROACTIVE BENEFITS. 

16 No benefits may be paid to any person as a result 

17 of the enactment of this Act for any period before the date 

18 of the enactment of this Act. 

19 SEC. 4. DEFINITION. 

20 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘qualified service’’ 

21 means service of a person as a member of the organization 

22 known as the United States Cadet Nurse Corps during 

23 the period beginning on July 1, 1943, and ending on De24 cember 15, 1945. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

s0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140706

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140706 COA: 286964 MAURICE CLIMMIE JACKSON, Wayne CC 07-012175-FC Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the quarterly report of New Design Cabinets, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six month period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth P. Laurent, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ Kenneth P. Laurent

|   | Kenneth P. Laurent |  
 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

August 10, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Ferreri , 87 Ohio St.3d 1245, 1999-Ohio-1.]

O FFICE OF D ISCIPLINARY C OUNSEL v . F ERRERI
. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Ferreri (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 1245.] (No. 98-2636 — Submitted December 29, 1999 — Decided December 30, 1999.) O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT
. On June 9, 1999, this court suspended respondent, Robert A. Ferreri, a.k.a. Robert Anthony Ferreri, Attorney Regi stration No. 0000860, for a period of eighteen months with the final twelve months stayed, and ordered, pursuant to Gov.Jud.R. III(7)(A), that respondent be suspended without pay from his position as Judge of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, for six months. On December 9, 1999, respon dent filed an application for reinstatement and on December 16, 1999, respondent filed a motion to expedite consideration of the application for reinstatement. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that respondent’s application for reinstatement be denied at this time pending this court’s disposition of case No. 99- 2175, Disciplinary Counsel v. Robert A. Ferreri

. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that all terms and conditions of the order of suspension entered in this case on June 9, 1999, shall continue in effect until further order of this court.2 For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Ferreri (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 649, 710 N.E.2d 1107. M OYER , C.J., D OUGLAS , R ESNICK , F.E. S WEENEY , C OOK and L UNDBERG S TRATTON , JJ., concur. P FEIFER , J., dissents.
Nicor Inc.
                                                              Form 10-K
                                                              Exhibit 23.01




                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report, dated January 26, 1999, included in this Form
10-K, into the company's previously filed Form S-3 Registration Statement
in connection with the Nicor Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and Stock
Purchase Plan (No. 33-56871), and Form S-8 Registration Statements in
connection with the Nicor Employee Stock Purchase Plan (No. 33-1732), the
Nicor Gas Savings Investment Plan (No. 33-56867), the Nicor Gas Thrift Plan
(No. 33-60689), the Birdsall Retirement Savings Plan (No. 333-28579), the
Nicor 1989 Long-Term Incentive Plan (No. 33-31029) and the Nicor 1997
Long-Term Incentive Plan (No. 333-28699).



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 18, 1999