alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Noble Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”), I, Kenneth M. Fisher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:July 26, 2012/s/ Kenneth M. FisherKenneth M. FisherChief Financial Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Announcements      

# Guidance: Education Department Reiterates — Title I Funding Can Be Used to Serve Homeless Students

This article explains the guidance provided in a recent “Dear Colleague” letter (PDF, 4 pages) issued by the Department of Education which explains how school districts can use Title I funds to help children and youth experiencing homelessness. Some examples of ways districts can use the funds are to transport homeless students to and from school, pay the salaries of staff who work with homeless youth, and to generally meet the needs of these students. **Learn more.**
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 173 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require 12-month continuous 

coverage for children under Medicaid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require 

12-month continuous coverage for children under Medicaid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Continuous 

5 Medicaid Coverage for Children Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF 12-MONTH CONTINUOUS COV7 ERAGE FOR CHILDREN UNDER MEDICAID. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902 of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 173 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para2 graph (74); 

3 (B) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para4 graph (82); 

5 (C) by striking the period at the end of 

6 paragraph (83) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

7 (D) by inserting after paragraph (83) the 

8 following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(84) meet the requirement of subsection 

10 (e)(12).’’; and 

11 (2) in subsection (e)(12), by striking ‘‘At the 

12 option of a State, the plan may’’ and inserting ‘‘The 

13 State plan under this title shall’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under 

16 paragraph (2), the amendments made by subsection 

17 (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2013, and shall 

18 apply to individuals who were determined eligible for 

19 medical assistance before, on, or after such date. 

20 (2) SPECIAL RULE FOR STATE LEGISLATION.— 

21 In the case of a State plan for medical assistance 

22 under title XIX of the Social Security Act which the 

23 Secretary of Health and Human Services determines 

24 requires State legislation (other than legislation ap25 propriating funds) in order for the plan to meet the 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HR 173 IH

1 additional requirement imposed by the amendment 

2 made by this section, the State plan shall not be re3 garded as failing to comply with the requirements of 

4 such title solely on the basis of its failure to meet 

5 that additional requirement before the later of the 

6 following dates: 

7 (A) The first day of the first calendar 

8 quarter beginning after the close of the first 

9 regular session of the State legislature that be10 gins after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

11 (B) October 1, 2013. 

12 For purposes of subparagraph (A), in the case of a 

13 State that has a 2-year legislative session, each year 

14 of such session shall be deemed to be a separate reg15 ular session of the State legislature. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 21, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 134320 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, CRAWFORD COUNT Y and KALKASKA Justices COUNTY, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 134320 COA: 254180 Otsego CC: 02-010014-CZ OTSEGO COUNTY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. A public question being involved, and in light of the relationships between the parties, no costs are awarded.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

d0318 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 21, 2008

Clerk
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40696

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL WILLIAM COCKE,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-97-CR-9-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 16, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Samuel William Cocke appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

making threats against the President and successors to the

President in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 871. Cocke contends that

the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the

indictment because it did not allege that he intended to carry

out the threat or that he intended the threat to be conveyed to

the President. Cocke’s argument is foreclosed by this court’s

precedent in United States v. DeShazo, 565 F.2d 893, 895 (5th 
No. 98-40696 

-2-

Cir. 1978).

Cocke argues that the district court erred in not making a

factual finding concerning whether he actually traveled to

Washington, D.C., in February 1997 to conduct surveillance of the

White House before the district court increased his offense level

under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 2A6.1(b)(1). Because Cocke

told Secret Service agents in interviews that he conducted

surveillance of the White House and Cocke did not present any

specific evidence at sentencing to rebut the facts presented in

the Presentence Report (PSR) concerning his actions, the district

court was entitled to adopt the facts in the PSR without further

inquiry. See United States v. Sherbak, 950 F.2d 1095, 1099-1100

(5th Cir. 1992).

Cocke argues that the district court erred in not decreasing

his offense level by four levels under § 2A6.1(b)(4), which

provides for such a reduction if the threat “involved a single

instance evidencing little or no deliberation.” § 2A6.1(b)(4). 

Because Cocke’s actions included obtaining stationery, searching

for an address, obtaining postage, and mailing the letter, his

actions were not spontaneous and did not warrant a reduction in

his offense level under § 2A6.1(b)(4). See United States v.

Stevenson, 126 F.3d 662, 665 (5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
#### UNITED STATES v. PARNES et al.

No. 94, Docket 22840.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 15, 1954.

Decided Feb. 3, 1954.

*143Edward Y. Broderick, New York City (Joseph H. Broderick, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

J. Edward Lumbard, U. S. Atty. for Southern Dist. of N. Y., New York City (William Esbitt, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before FRANK, MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

 Of course, the fact that a conspiracy succeeded does not bar conviction for the crime of conspiracy. The evidence amply supported the verdict. Proof that no export license had issued at New York, whence the gold was exported, justified an inference, not rebutted by Parnés, that no license did issue. The furtive conduct of Parnés and the co-conspirators made it reasonable to infer that they knew that there had been no compliance with the conditions of lawful exportation, and accordingly that it was illegal.

We assume, arguendo, that, over objection, the reception of Davidowitz’ testimony, as proof of another crime, would have been error. However, defense counsel not only failed to object to Davidowitz’ testimony on direct, but cross-examined Davidowitz at length. Only then did defense counsel move to strike this testimony. In these circumstances, the trial judge committed no error in refusing to grant that motion. See Marx v. United States, 8 Cir., 86 F.2d 245, 251; Metcalf v. United States, 6 Cir., 195 F.2d 213, 216-217.

Affirmed.
#### Briscoe &c. *vs.*Bank of the Commonwealth.

debt.:. Case *Wt.*

Appeal from 'll-- Mercer Circuit; Kelly Judge.

*Bank of the Commonwealth. Constitution of the United States.*

The Bank of the Common-n,ZPCi to be consistent wl!l\the c*"11theUU°S.in conformity «i'h previous, deoisioliS;

*Owsley*and *Uaggin,*for appellants; *Crittenden}*for appellee*

ftfay g_

■Judge Nicholas

d livered the opinion of the court.

We are called upon in this case, to re-adjudicate the question of the constitutionality of the Bank of the Commonwealth, and its right ió maintain an action upon an obligation given in consideration of a loan of its notes. We consider this question as having been settled in the case of Lampton against the Bank, II. Litt. 300. If it be true as contended in argument, on behalf of the appellants, that the question is presented on the face of the *charter,*that case has been incidentally recognised and confirrmed by a hundred cases, that-have since passed through this court. The case of Craig vs. Missouri, IV. Peters, has been relied on as ruling this. We do not think that it does. They are distinguishable in at least one important and essential particular.

Wherefore, judgment is affirmed with damages and costs.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28403]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than November 24, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 
33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Frankfurt, Germany; to acquire 
up to 100 percent of the voting shares of PB Capital Corporation and PB 
(USA) Realty Corporation, both of New York, New York, and thereby 
engage in brokering, servicing loans and other extensions of credit, 
and in commercial real estate lending and leasing, pursuant to sections 
225.28(b)(1) and (b)(3) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 5, 
2010.
Robert de V. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-28403 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
#### JESSOP, Respondent, v. STEVENSON et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by James Jessop, as trustee, etc., against Henry Jessop Stevenson, Cora Ethel Stevenson and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 21, 2021

.

________________ No. 3D20

- 0669 Lower Tribunal No. 11

- 25407

________________ 

### Alexander Robyn , Appellant,

vs. 

### Corina E. Robyn , Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Marcia Del Rey , Judge. Abramowitz and Associates, and Evan L. Abramowitz , for appellant. Davis Smith & Jean, LLC, and Sonja A. Jean and Laura Davis Smith , for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J. , and GORDO and LOBREE , JJ.

CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.2 The former wife properly concedes that the trial court erred in finding the former husband in willful contempt for failing to pay court ordered undifferentiated support in the amount of $188,000.00 where the contempt order does not contain a purge provision or a finding that the husband has the present a bility to purge himself of the contempt. See Sosa v. Portilla , 306 So. 3d 979 , 980 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020); Douglas v. Douglas , 485 So. 2d
18 , 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Because we are reversing on this basis, we need not reach the former husband’s argument that the requirement that the $188,000 be paid from the entirety of his salary violates 15 U.S.C. § 1673 (b)
but we remind the trial court that income deduction orders must comply with section 61.1301, Florida Statutes (2021). See Garcia v. Garcia , 560 So. 2d
4 03 , 404

- 05 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).
Reversed and remanded.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. LAWSON v. LAWSON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of William M. Lawson, against Lena L. Lawson.

No opinion. Motion denied, with §10 costs.
#### TUCKER, Appellant, v. DUDLEY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 22, 1906.)

Action by Edwin H. Tucker against Eugene B. Dudley.

No opinion. Motion denied.
#### RAYMOND, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

Action by Katharine Raymond, as executrix, against the New York City Railway Company. C. F. Brown, for appellant. A. F. Clark, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event; unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce judgment as entered, including costs, etc., to $7,858.15, in which event judgment as so modified and order affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resources: Briefs on Prolonged Youth Homelessness      

# Resources: Briefs on Prolonged Youth Homelessness

These briefs discuss characteristics and experiences of young people who are homeless for prolonged periods of time, including the intersection with serious mental illness, and provide information on promising interventions for this population. Professionals who work with youth experiencing homelessness can use these resources to better understand these youth and the interventions that could be used to reduce prolonged youth homelessness:     1. **Factors Associated with Prolonged Homelessness:** Summarizes characteristics associated with prolonged episodes of homelessness among youth     2. **The Role of Serious Mental Illness with Prolonged Youth Homelessness:** Explores the intersection between prolonged homelessness and serious mental illness among youth     3. **Interventions for Addressing Prolonged Youth Homelessness:** Presents available evidence about interventions to prevent or reduce prolonged youth homelessness**Learn more.**
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Accessibility (for Disabled)AgenciesCivil Rights LegislationCompliance (Legal)Computer SoftwareDisabilitiesFederal GovernmentInformation TechnologyOffice MachinesTelecommunicationsWorld Wide Web

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### § 1901.201 Purpose.

This subpart contains policies and procedures for implementing the regulations of the Department of Agriculture issued pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Executive Order 11246 and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act of 1974, as they relate to the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to prohibit preference to American Indians on Indian Reservations.

[41 FR 40112, Sept. 17, 1976]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 14 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarter  ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk,
Vice  President  -Chief  Financial  Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Partnership.




/s/ MELANIE R. WENK
-------------------
Melanie R. Wenk
Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
April 1, 2010
#### CITC Industries, Inc., Appellant, v William Manowitz et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 3, 1979, denying plaintiff’s motion for a protective order, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. While we might modify further to restrict the area of deposition, this is a matter peculiarly within *764the discretion of Special Term, with which we are loathe to interfere. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Sandler, Markewich and Carro, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Martin Daley, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 21, 1979, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Martuscello, JJ., concur.