alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 42 (Friday, March 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 12908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04570]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-67-2020]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 26--Atlanta, Georgia; Authorization of 
Limited Production Activity; Ricoh Electronics, Inc. (Toner Products, 
Thermal Paper and Thermal Film), Lawrenceville and Buford, Georgia

    On, November 2, 2020, Ricoh Electronics, Inc. (Ricoh) submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facilities within FTZ 26 in Lawrenceville and Buford, Georgia.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (85 FR 72620-72621, November 13, 
2020). On March 2, 2021, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that further review of part of the proposed activity is 
warranted. The FTZ Board authorized the production activity described 
in the notification on a limited basis, subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including Section 400.14, and further subject to a 
five-year time limit on authorization for Ricoh to admit its ``titanium 
dioxide mixture'' input in nonprivileged foreign status (19 CFR 
146.42).

    Dated: March 2, 2021.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-04570 Filed 3-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP [logo]

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP/s.r.l./s.e.n.c.r.l.
1250 Rene-Levesque Boulevard West
Suite 2800
Montreal, Quebec
Canada H3B 2G4
Telephone +1 514 205-5000
Facsimile +1 514 876-1502


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-134745) of Manaris Corporation of our report
dated September 29, 2006 relating to the financial statements, which appears in
this Form 10-KSB.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants


Montreal, Quebec, Canada
September 29, 2006
#### § 1484.78 Amendments.

An agreement may be amended in writing with the consent of CCC and the Cooperator. All requests for program amendments must be submitted to CCC in writing and contain a justification for why the amendment is necessary. All amendment requests must be reviewed and approved by CCC before an amendment can be issued.
§ 1405.1 Interest. ( a ) Except as may otherwise be determined by CCC as provided in individual program regulations, program contracts or such other means as deemed appropriate by CCC the rate of interest that is applicable to CCC loans shall be equal to the rate of interest charged by the U.S. Treasury for funds borrowed by CCC on the date the loan is disbursed by CCC, plus 1 percent. This rate of interest shall be in effect until the earlier of the maturity of the loan or the next January 1.
( b ) The rate of interest applicable to all CCC loans that are outstanding as of January 1 of any year shall be adjusted as of such date to equal the rate of interest charged by the U.S. Treasury for funds borrowed by CCC on such date, plus 1 percent. This rate shall be in effect until the earlier of the maturity of the loan or the next January 1. The rate of interest applicable to CCC loans as of January 1 of any year shall be announced by CCC by press release or other means.
#### § 15f.23 What will constitute the record for the final determination?

The original complaint, the Section 741 Complaint Request, the OCR report, the agency answer, the transcript of testimony, exhibits, affidavits, depositions, briefs, memoranda of law, and all pleadings, motions, papers, and requests filed in the proceeding, including rulings, and the proposed determination by an ALJ (if applicable) shall constitute the exclusive record for the final determination.
#### § 1710.200 Purpose.

This subpart contains RUS policies for the preparation, review, approval and use of load forecasts. A load forecast is a thorough study of a borrower's electric loads and the factors that affect those loads in order to estimate, as accurately as practicable, the borrower's future requirements for energy and capacity. The load forecast of a power supply borrower includes and integrates the load forecasts of its member systems. An approved load forecast, if required by this subpart, is one of the primary documents that a borrower is required to submit to support a loan application.

[65 FR 14786, Mar. 20, 2000, as amended at 87 FR 73437, Nov. 30, 2022]
#### §§ 1709.218-1709.300 [Reserved]
#### § 15.11 Judicial review.

Action taken pursuant to section 602 of the Act is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603 of the Act.
#### Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellant, v Robert Glaubman, Respondent.

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 31, 1979, which, *inter alia,*denied its application. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and application granted. We reverse on constraint of *Board of Educ. v Cohen*(73 AD2d 660). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ForgeHouse, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Jorge Vargas, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





August
14, 2009





/s/ Jorge VargasJorge
      VargasChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### O'NEIL, Appellant, v. KARR, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 26, 1906.)

Action by John O'Neil against Thomas H. Karr.

PER CTJRIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

CHESTER and KELLOGG, JJ., dissent.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1424.14 Offsets, assignments, interest and waivers. ( a ) Any payment or portion thereof to any person shall be made without regard to questions of title under State law and without regard to any claim or lien against the bioenergy, or proceeds thereof, in favor of the owner or any other creditor except agencies of the U.S. Government. The regulations governing offsets and withholdings found in part 1403 of this chapter shall be applicable to agreement payments.
( b ) Any producer entitled to any payment may assign any payments in accordance with regulations governing the assignment of payments found at part 1404 of this chapter.
( c ) Interest charged by CCC under this part shall be at the rate of interest that the United States Treasury charges CCC for funds, as of the date CCC made such funds available. Such interest shall accrue from the date such payments were made available to the date of repayment or the date interest increases as determined in accordance with applicable regulations.
( d ) CCC may waive the accrual of interest and/or damages if CCC determines that the cause of the erroneous determination was not due to any action of the bioenergy producer.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed August 30, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00433-CV MARY L. TYLER, Appellant V. TRI CITY ANIMAL SHELTER AND CI TY OF CEDAR HILL, Appellees On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-23-13175 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Pedersen, III, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal from the trial court’s November 3, 2023 order granting appellees’ plea to the jurisdiction as it did not appear to have been timely filed. See Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney,
L.L.C. , 302 S.W.3d 542, 545 (Tex. App.—Dalla s 2009, no pet.) ( op. on reh’g) (timely filing of notice of appeal is juri sdictional). Because no motion for new trial or request for findings of fact and conclusi ons of law was filed, the notice of appeal was due December 4, 2023, or with an extension motion, December 19, 2023. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 4.1, 26.1, 26.3. The notice of appeal was not filed, however, until April 10, 2024.–2– At our request, the parties filed jurisd ictional letter briefs . Appellant’s letter brief does not demonstrate we have jurisdic tion. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. 42.3(a); Brashear , 302 S.W.3d at 545.

240433F.P05 /Ro b bie Partida-Kipness / ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MARY L. TYLER, Appellant
No. 05-24-00433-CV V. TRI CITY ANIMAL SHELTER, AND CITY OF CEDAR HILL, Appellees On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-23-13175.Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness, Justices Pedersen, III and Carlyle participating.

In accordance with this Court’ s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
Judgment entered this 30 th day of August 2024.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        1,695,832
<SECURITIES>                                    348,121
<RECEIVABLES>                                 7,662,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                    588,439
<INVENTORY>                                     395,291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             11,045,163
<PP&E>                                        3,805,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                2,635,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               13,572,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         6,705,926
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         94,083
<OTHER-SE>                                    6,772,808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 13,572,817
<SALES>                                      26,879,411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             26,879,411
<CGS>                                         6,363,695
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                27,818,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              153,071
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (989,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (989,629)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (989,629)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.11)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32-1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 13 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.


Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date: April 29, 2011
EXHIBIT 23.1














Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-1 No. 333-162350 and Form S-8 333-166327) of CryoPort, Inc. of our report dated June 21, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of CryoPort, Inc. (the “Company”) included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern) as of March 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years then ended.





/s/KMJ Corbin & Company, LLP





Costa Mesa, California


June 21, 2010
#### § 1717.612 RUS approval of borrower's bank or other depository.

If a borrower's mortgage or loan contract gives RUS the authority to approve the bank or other depositories used by the borrower, such approval is hereby granted. However, without the prior written approval of RUS, a borrower shall not deposit funds from loans made or guaranteed by RUS in any bank or other depository that is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or other Federal agency acceptable to RUS, or in any account not so insured.
#### § 1216.80 Right of the Secretary.

All fiscal matters, programs, plans, or projects, rules or regulations, reports, or other substantive actions proposed and prepared by the Board shall be submitted to the Secretary for approval.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/15 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 32.2


Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Noble Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2018 (the “Report”), I, Kenneth M. Fisher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:November 1, 2018/s/ Kenneth M. FisherKenneth M. FisherChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Milk Bottle Cards Inc.
(Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
I, Nicole Milkovich, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of Registrant.

June 1, 2007                   Milk Bottle Cards, Inc., Registrant


                                   /s/ Nicole Milkovich
                                   -----------------------------------
                               By: Nicole Milkovich, President,
                                   CEO, Secretary, Treasurer, CFO,
                                   Principal Accounting Officer and
                                   Sole Director
852.235-74 Acknowledgement of Support and Disclaimer. As prescribed at 835.003-75, insert the following clause: Acknowledgement of Support and Disclaimer (DEC 2022) ( a ) The Contractor shall include an acknowledgment of the Government's support in the publication of any material based on or developed under this contract, stated in the following terms: This material is based upon work supported by the (name of contracting agency) under this VA contract.
( b ) All material, except scientific articles or papers published in scientific journals, must, in addition to any notices or disclaimers by the Contractor, also contain the following disclaimer:
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the VA. (End of clause) [87 FR 70750, Nov. 21, 2022]
#### Myrna Weiner et al., Appellants, v New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association, Respondent. (And Four Other Actions.)

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered April 30, 1979 in Ulster County, which consolidated five actions for joint trial. When two or more actions are pending before a court and they involve "a common question of law or fact”, CPLR 602 (subd [a]) provides that the court may, on motion, consolidate them or, as here, order them jointly tried. The motion lies in the discretion of the court, and the burden is on the party resisting the motion to show that it would prejudice him *(Maigur v Saratogian, Inc.,*47 AD2d 982). Each of the five actions herein raise common factual questions concerning the validity of the assignment of the mortgage to plaintiff Myrna Weiner. It would economize judicial effort to have that issue determined in one trial, rather than in separate trials which could result in inconsistent verdicts. It is not necessary that all questions of law or fact be common to the various actions *(Thayer v Collett,*41 AD2d 581), and *781the fact that certain of the actions involve equitable causes of action does not prevent joinder *(Vinlis Constr. Co. v Roreck,*23 AD2d 895). Plaintiffs have not shown any prejudice to them in a joint trial, and, accordingly, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in ordering a joint trial. Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 26, 2012

d1217 

# Order

December 26, 2012

144843(43)

JOHN L. HALFORD,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 144843

COA: 304068

Genesee CC: 11

- 095586

- NO

CITY OF FLINT,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 25, 2012

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.

C AVANAGH and H ATHAWAY , J J., would grant reconsideration and, on

reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: R.L.C.-E. A/K/A 

R.C.-E., A MINOR

PETITION OF: J.C., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 83 EM 2018

IN THE INTEREST OF: G.J.C.-E. A/K/A 

G.C.E., A MINOR

PETITION OF: J.C., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 84 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is directed to file the 

already-prepared Petition for Allowance of Appeal within five days.