alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Investment Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on thedate hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,2018 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
Date: February 5, 2019/s/ David GladstoneDavid Gladstone
*Chief Executive Officer and*

*Chairmanof the Board of Directors*
**
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1450.213 Levels and rates for establishment payments. ( a ) CCC will pay not more than 50 percent of the actual or average cost (whichever is lower) of establishing non-woody perennial crops and woody perennial crops specified in the conservation plan, forest stewardship plan, or equivalent plan, not to exceed $500 per acre. For socially disadvantaged farmers or ranchers, as defined in part 718 of this title, establishment payments may not exceed $750 per acre.
( b ) The average cost of performing a practice will be determined by CCC based on recommendations from the State Technical Committee. Such cost may be the average cost in a State, a county, or a part of a State or county, as determined by CCC. The average cost as determined by CCC will be used for payment purposes, if it is less than the actual cost for an individual participant.
( c ) Except as otherwise provided for in this part, a participant may receive, in addition to any payment under this part, establishment assistance, rental payments, or tax benefits from a State or a private organization in return for enrolling lands in BCAP without a commensurate reduction in BCAP establishment payments.
[75 FR 66234, Oct. 27, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 10575, Feb. 27, 2015]
#### § 160.69 Expenses to be borne by person requesting service.

All expenses incurred by the United States in connection with the sampling, analysis, classification, or grading of naval stores on request, not otherwise provided for by suitable regulation, shall be borne by the person making the request.

[11 FR 14665, Dec. 27, 1946, as amended at 17 FR 221, Jan. 9, 1952; 20 FR 6433, Sept. 1, 1955. Redesignated at 46 FR 47055, Sept. 24, 1981, as amended at 47 FR 3345, Jan. 25, 1982]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Other Youth Topics

## Breadcrumb

            -  Youth Topics 
            -  Positive Youth Development 
            -  Youth Adult Partnerships 
            -           Youth Engagement at the Federal Level: A Compilation of Strategies and Practices      

# Youth Engagement at the Federal Level: A Compilation of Strategies and Practices

This compilation of briefs on the youth engagement efforts of 12 agencies and departments describes the accomplishments and basic mechanisms of these strategies while also noting barriers, challenges, and vision for the future. The conversations that informed this report consistently clarified that federal policymakers engaging young adults do so with two clear goals in mind: 1) to better support completion of their agencies’ missions, and 2) to support the development of young adults.

**Download the report (PDF, 53 pages).**

                      - Positive Youth Development
                      - Key Principles
                      - Integrating
                      - Culture Influences
                      - Involving Youth
                      - Assessing Youth Involvement & Engagement
                      - Effectiveness
                      - References
                      - Research Agenda
                      - Youth Adult Partnerships

## Help Spread the Word About youth.gov

Get a Web Badge
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Housing      

# Housing

Maternity Group Homes Fact Sheet

#### Pagination

-  Previous page‹‹ 
-           Page 2        

  Subscribe to Housing
§ 1717.160 Application contents. An application for RUS approval of a merger must include the documents listed in this section. Documents listed in this section may be combined with the documents required by §§ 1717.152 and/or 1717.157 where appropriate. ( a ) *Transmittal letters* signed by the managers of all borrowers and non-borrowers who are parties to the proposed merger. These letters must include the actual corporate name, address, and taxpayer identification number of all parties to the proposed merger. The transmittal letters must be signed originals on corporate letterhead stationery.
( b ) *Resolutions from the boards of directors* of all borrowers and non-borrowers who are parties to the proposed merger. This document is the formal request by each entity for RUS approval of the proposed merger. The board resolution must include a description of the proposed merger, including timeframes, and authorization for RUS to release appropriate information to supplemental or other lenders, and for these lenders to release appropriate information to RUS. Each board resolution must be a certified original.
( c ) *Evidence* that the proposed merger will result in a viable entity, and that the security of outstanding RUS loans will not be adversely affected by the action. This evidence shall include financial forecasts, and any available studies such as net present value analyses covering a period of not less than 10 years from the effective date of the merger, as well as information about any threatened actions by other parties that could adversely affect the financial condition of any of the parties to the proposed merger, or of the successor. Such threatened actions may include annexations or other actions affecting service territory, loads, rates or other such matters.
( d ) *Regulatory information* about pending federal or state proceedings pertaining to any of the parties that could have material effects on the successor.
( e ) *Rate information.* Distribution and power supply borrowers shall submit schedules of proposed rates after the merger, including the effects of the proposed action on rates and the status of any pending rate cases before a state regulatory authority. The rates of power supply borrowers are subject to RUS approval. If rates are not projected to change after the merger, a statement to that effect will suffice.
( f ) *Area coverage and line extension policies.* If any distribution systems are parties to the proposed merger, a statement of proposed area coverage and line extension policies for the successor.
#### § 1721.109 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements in this part are approved by the Office of Management and Budget and assigned OMB control number 0572-0123.
Nicor
      Inc.


Form
      10-K


Exhibit
      10.46








FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO THE


NICOR
      INC. SALARY DEFERRAL PLAN








WHEREAS,
      Nicor Inc., (the “Company”), established and maintains the Nicor
      Inc. Salary Deferral Plan (“Salary Deferral Plan”)





WHEREAS,
      amendment of the Salary Deferral Plan is desirable in
      order
      to take advantage of special transition rules applicable to the Salary Deferral
      Plan pursuant to guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service under Section
      409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 409A”) in order
      to ease administration of Salary Deferral Plan.





NOW,
      THEREFORE, pursuant
      to the power and authority reserved to the Company pursuant to Section 8.1
      of
      the Salary Deferral Plan and delegated to the undersigned officer by resolution
      dated November 17, 2005 the Salary Deferral Plan is hereby amended, effective
      as January
      1, 2005 by adding the following Section 5.15 to the Salary Deferral
      Plan:





“5.15  Section
      409A Distributions in 2005 .
      Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 2.2(f) and 5.9 and in accordance
      with
      IRS Notice 2005-1, each Participant whose Termination Date was due to Normal
      Retirement or Early Retirement in calendar year 2005 shall be permitted to
      (i)
      cancel his Participation Election for salary otherwise payable in 2005 and/or
      (ii) have any portion of his Account balance that would be subject to Section
      409A of the Code paid in a lump sum distribution in 2005.”




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized officer has caused this First Amendment
      to
      be executed on this 15 th day of
      December, 2005.








**NICOR
      INC.**








By: /s/
      CLAUDIA J. COLALILLO


Claudia
      J. Colalillo


Its:
      Senior Vice President, Human Resources and Corporate Communications
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF FRANK AIELLO


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

     In connection with the Periodic Report of Cal Alta Auto Glass, Inc.,(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank
Aiello, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: August 10, 2005        By: /s/ Frank Aiello
                                                       -------------------
                                                        Frank Aiello
                                                        President
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of M.L. Macadamia Orchards, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersignedmanagement of the Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

 
| /s/ Dennis J. Simonis |   |
|-----------------------|--------|

 

Dennis J. Simonis

President andChief Executive Officer

March 15,2010

 

----
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00269

- CV

J AMES R EEDOM

, Appellant

V

.

5950 B OCA R ATON LP D / B / A

M ADISON P ARK (W OODSTOCK )

, Appellee §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 1

of Tarrant County (2018

- 004416

- 1)

A ugust 2 6 , 2019

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

I t is fu rther ordered that Appellant James Reedom shall pay all of the costs of

this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

________________ Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
#### § 160.91 Meaning of words “pine” and “pine tree.”

The words “pine” or “pine tree,” when used to designate the source of spirits of turpentine, shall be deemed to mean a living, growing plant of the genus *Pinus,* family Pinaceae, unless the words “wood of” are used in connection therewith. The terms “oleoresin of the southern pine” or “oleoresin from the southern pine” shall be deemed to mean the gum or oleoresin exuded by such living, growing trees, the source of gum spirits of turpentine.
## Other Youth Topics

## Breadcrumb

            -  Youth Topics 
            -  Violence Prevention 
            -           Strategic Planning Toolkit for Communities      

# Strategic Planning Toolkit for Communities

### Benefits of Forum Plans

                        - Address critical problems that no single agency can solve alone.
                        - Identify areas in which funds and time can be better spent.
                        - Build partnerships for planning and implementation. People will support what they help create.
                        - Build the city’s capacity for local data sharing and analysis.
                        - Improve outcomes for youth and neighborhoods through coordinated strategies.
                        - Give potential funders confidence in the city’s commitment to collaboration.
                        - Develop strategies to sustain the city’s reductions in youth violence over time.

### Make a Plan

Youth violence is directly tied to a city’s quality of life, economic health, and potential growth. Across the country, cities using the Forum’s comprehensive approach are working to reduce youth violence. These cities are using multi-disciplinary partnerships that develop and implement strategic plans driven by local data, with a combination of **prevention, intervention, enforcement, and reentry strategies**. Based on evaluated efforts over the past 20 years, integrated, multi-year plans represent a locality’s best chance to sustainably reduce youth violence over time.

Most cities already engage in some level of formal planning for youth development and violence prevention, and for enforcement responses to youth and gang violence. Integrating these plans can improve outcomes for youth, and for the city as a whole. By developing comprehensive strategies that engage multiple partners, cities can take best advantage of their assets and resources.

We invite you to use the Forum’s new Strategic Planning Toolkit as you develop—or revisit—your city’s plan(s) to prevent and respond to youth violence.

Download the Strategic Planning Toolkit (PDF, 30 Pages)

## Main navigation

- About the National Forum
- National Forum Strategic Plan 2011-2015
- Strategic Planning Toolkit
- Spotlight on Forum Communities
- Involving the Philanthropic & Corporate Community
- Sustainability
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7685

JOHN WAYNE BOLTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-97-679-R) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Wayne Bolton, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen B. Martin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Wayne Bolton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Bolton v. Angelone , No. CA-97-679-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1643 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1643

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow penalty-free 
 withdrawals from the Federal Thrift Savings Fund to employees who are 
        furloughed as a result of the Federal budget sequester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2013

  Mr. Kilmer (for himself and Ms. Hanabusa) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow penalty-free 
 withdrawals from the Federal Thrift Savings Fund to employees who are 
        furloughed as a result of the Federal budget sequester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Employee Hardship Financial Relief 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PENALTY-FREE WITHDRAWALS FROM THRIFT SAVINGS FUND TO FEDERAL 
              EMPLOYEES FURLOUGHED AS A RESULT OF SEQUESTER.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 72(t) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to subsection not to apply to certain 
distributions) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(H) Distributions from thrift savings fund to 
                furloughed federal employees.--Distributions to an 
                individual from the Thrift Savings Fund during the 
                period--
                            ``(i) beginning on the date that the 
                        individual is furloughed (as defined in section 
                        7811(a)(5) of title 5, United States Code) 
                        because of lack of funds, and
                            ``(ii) ending on the date which is 30 days 
                        after such furlough ceases for such individual,
                but only to the extent that the aggregate such 
                distributions with respect to any furlough does not 
                exceed the aggregate reduction in such individual's 
                compensation on account of such furlough.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to distributions after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### SHERI PAIGE *v.*STATEWIDE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE

(AC 23721)

Schaller, Bishop and Dupont, Js.

Argued October 20

officially released December 2, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1416.6 Payment eligibility and limitation. ( a ) For 2019 and each subsequent program year, a person, legal entity, or member of a joint venture or general partnership, as determined in part 1400 of this chapter, cannot receive, directly or indirectly, more than $125,000 per program year under LFP.
( b ) The Deputy Administrator may take such actions as needed to avoid a duplication of benefits under the programs provided for in this part, or duplication of benefits received in other programs, and may impose such cross-program payment limitations as may be consistent with the intent of this part in order to help prevent a person or legal entity being paid more than the total value of their loss.
( c ) For the purposes of administering LIP, LFP, ELAP, and TAP, the average adjusted gross income (AGI) limitation provisions in part 1400 of this chapter relating to limits on payments for persons or legal entities, excluding joint ventures and general partnerships, apply under this subpart and will apply to each applicant for ELAP, LFP, LIP, and TAP. Specifically, a person or legal entity with an AGI that exceeds $900,000 will not be eligible to receive benefits under this part.
( d ) The direct attribution provisions in part 1400 of this chapter apply to ELAP, LFP, LIP, and TAP.
[83 FR 49463, Oct. 2, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 10963, Feb. 26, 2020]