alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Glo GermTM Company P. O. Box 189 • Moab, Utah 84532 • www.glogerm.com August 6, 2013 (435) 259-5693 (800) 842-6622 ext 117 (435) 259-5930 fax

Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief ofthe EAS Division Aviation Analysis 1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E. VVashington, D.C. 20590 RE: Essential Air Service Applications Dear Mr. DeVany: co

Istrongly feel that this is one ofthe most important elements tothe County, City and even the State of Utah's economic well-being and should be seriously evaluated. The revenue generated by tourists being able tomake flight reservations seamlessly would have aIl}ajor impact on increasing both domestic and international flight enplanements which could dramatically improve federal funding forthe Canyonlands Airport. The smaller aircraft and restrictive ticketing of Great Lakes Airlines would ha~e significant negative impact on all levels ofrevenue income. SkyWest in partnership with Delta means visitors can make flights to Moab on asingle Delta ticket; and more importantly the Delta sales anct'support is also available ontotal trip planning. This would greatly improve the international travtll. Currently, asignificant number ofdetermined international tourists use Las Vegas hub and because ofthe distance to Moab, anunknown number ofvisitors are lost to the State ofUtah. Further, Great Lakes Airlines has demonstrated that they aremotivated by EAS income: not passenger revenue or service. Iam totally convinced thatthe service to Las Vegas and its termination was apolitical move, first to get Grand County acceptance andthen use that service as aploy to getthe Ely, NV service and when the Ely service was not approved; Great Lakes canceled the Moab to Las Vegas leg. Finally, service to Salt Lake City rather than Denver would better serve the residents ofMoab/Grand County and visitors alike. As the President oftwo companies marketing worldwide, Ifully understand the importance ofgood transportation availability and SkyWest offers the service that local companies need fortheir own growth and connectivity.
. , Istrongly recommend that the approval ofthe SkyWest application. Sincerely, 

# J~!;<yXt4

President
§ 1487.20 Amendments. ( a ) Participants may request to modify approved projects if circumstances change in such a way that they would likely affect the progress and ultimate success of a project. Such modification must be made through a written amendment to the agreement. All requests for project modifications must be made in writing to CCC and must include: ( 1 ) A justification as to why changes to the project as originally designed are needed;
( 2 ) An explanation of the necessary adjustments in approach or strategy; and
( 3 ) A description of necessary changes in the project's time line(s) and/or budget (*e.g.,* shifting of budgetary resources from one-line item to another in order to accommodate the changes).
( b ) All requests for project modifications must be reviewed and approved by CCC. Upon approval, CCC will issue an amendment to the agreement, which must be signed by CCC and the Participant.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Cuyler Reddy, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 18, 1978, convicting him of murder in the second degree, manslaughter in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Prior to this trial, the trial court amended the indictment to delete the name of the codefendant, who had previously been acquitted of the instant charges. It cannot be said that this amendment of the indictment prejudiced defendant in his defense on the merits or altered the theory of the People’s case (see CPL 200.70; *People v Trimm,*29 AD2d 83; cf. *People v Boyd,*59 AD2d 558). Therefore the amendment was proper. We have considered defendant’s remaining points and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Cohalan, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Datawatch Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kenneth P.
Bero, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










/s/ Kenneth P. Bero
              Kenneth
      P. Bero
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              December
      24, 2008
Motion GRANTED and Order filed May 27, 2022. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00366-CV

____________

IN RE HILLIER RESTORATION, LLC, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-23268

ORDER

On May 25, 2022, relator Hillier Restoration, LLC, filed a first amended

petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relator asks this court to order the 

Honorable Dedra Davis, Judge of the 270th District Court, in Harris County, Texas, 

to set aside her May 16, 2022 order, granting real party in interest’s verified petition 

for an order authorizing the taking of a deposition to investigate a potential claim 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202, which was entered in trial court 
2

number 2022-23268, styled Marlow v. Hillier Restoration LLC d/b/a Paul Davis 

a/k/a PDR of Greater Houston, TX. 

Relator has also filed a motion for temporary stay of proceedings below. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On May 20, 2022, relator asked this court to stay 

proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of 

mandamus.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s request 

for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless 

immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion and 

issue the following order:

We ORDER the May 16, 2022 order in trial court cause number 2022-23268, 

Marlow v. Hillier Restoration LLC d/b/a Paul Davis a/k/a PDR of Greater Houston, 

TX, STAYED until a final decision by this court on relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus, or until further order of this court.

In addition, the court requests real party in interest Sandra Shelton Marlow to 

file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before June 17, 2022. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Poissant.
§ 1710.251 Construction work plans—distribution borrowers. ( a ) All distribution borrowers must maintain a current CWP covering all new construction, improvements, replacements, and retirements of distribution and transmission plant, and improvements replacements, and retirements of any generation plant. Construction of new generation capacity need not be included in a CWP but must be specified and supported by specific engineering and cost studies. (See § 1710.253.)
( b ) A distribution borrower's CWP shall typically cover a construction period of 4 years and includes all facilities to be constructed which are eligible for RUS financing, whether or not RUS financial assistance will be sought or be available for certain facilities. Any RUS financing provided for the facilities will be limited to a 4 year loan period. The construction period covered by a CWP in support of a loan application shall not be shorter than the loan period requested for financing of the facilities.
( c ) The facilities, equipment and other items included in a distribution borrower's CWP may include: ( 1 ) Line extensions required to connect consumers, improve service reliability or improve voltage conditions;
( 2 ) Distribution tie lines to improve reliability of service and voltage regulation;
( 3 ) Line conversions and changes required to improve existing services or provide additional capacity for new consumers;
( 4 ) New substation facilities or additions to existing substations;
( 5 ) Transmission and substation facilities required to support the distribution system;
( 6 ) Distribution equipment required to serve new consumers or to provide adequate and dependable service to existing consumers, including replacement of existing plant facilities;
( 7 ) Outdoor lights;
( 8 ) Communications equipment and meters;
( 9 ) Headquarters facilities;
( 10 ) Improvements, replacements, and retirements of generation facilities;
( 11 ) Load management equipment, automatic sectionalizing facilities, and centralized System Control and Data Acquisition equipment. Load management equipment eligible for financing, including the related costs of installation, is limited to capital equipment designed to influence the time and manner of consumer use of electricity, which includes peak clipping and load shifting. To be eligible for financing, such equipment must be owned by the borrower, although it may be located inside or outside a consumer's premises;
( 12 ) The cost of engineering, architectural, environmental, and other studies and plans needed to support the construction of facilities, when such cost is capitalized as part of the cost of the facilities; and
( 13 ) Other items that are specifically determined by RUS as being eligible for financing prior to inclusion in the CWP.
[57 FR 1053, Jan. 9, 1992; 57 FR 4513, Feb. 5, 1992, as amended at 60 FR 3731, Jan. 19, 1995; 60 FR 67405, Dec. 29, 1995; 84 FR 32612, July 9, 2019; 86 FR 36196, July 9, 2021]
#### Joseph Kunickas, appellee, v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,292.

Opinion filed May 31, 1929.

Hoyne, O’Connor & Rubinkam, for appellant. Victor Frohlieh and Charles Frohlieh, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1159 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1159

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 2023

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 to require periodic reviews 
   and updated reports relating to the Department of State's Taiwan 
                              Guidelines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERIODIC REVIEWS AND UPDATED REPORTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              STATE'S TAIWAN GUIDELINES UNDER THE TAIWAN ASSURANCE ACT 
              OF 2020.

    Section 315 of the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 (Public Law 116-
260; 134 Stat. 3100) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(1), by adding at the end before ``; 
        and'' the following: ``and any successor document or related 
        document disseminating such guidance''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Periodic Reviews and Updated Reports.--
            ``(1) In general.--For as long as the Department of State's 
        guidance that governs relations with Taiwan described in 
        subsection (a) remains in effect, the Secretary of State shall 
        conduct periodic reviews as described in subsection (a) and 
        submit updated reports as described in subsection (c) not less 
        frequently than every two years following the submission of the 
        initial report described in subsection (c).
            ``(2) Matters to be included.--Such updated reports shall 
        include--
                    ``(A) a description of how the guidance meets the 
                goals and objectives described in paragraphs (1), (2), 
                and (3) of subsection (b); and
                    ``(B) an identification of opportunities and plans 
                to lift self-imposed restrictions on relations with 
                Taiwan.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 22, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 1484.22 Allocation factors.

CCC determines final funding levels after allocating available funds to approved applications on the basis of criteria that will be fully described in each program year's Cooperator program announcement. Generally, extensions will not be allowable.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Youth Leadership Toolkit: Branding and Logos      

# Youth Leadership Toolkit: Branding and Logos

Branding is an important aspect of marketing and creating a positive image for your group. This section provides useful tips for building your brand including creating logos, selecting tag lines, use of color, and advertising.

https://library.childwelfare.gov/cwig/ws/library/docs/capacity/Blob/77919.pdf;jsessionid=711765EA864AAECFD0C37D4311FEA541?r=1&rpp=25&upp=0&w=NATIVE%28%27NRC%20ph%20is%20%27%27National%20Resource%20Center%20for%20Youth%20Development%27%27%27%29&m=13&order...
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
 June 30, 2009 Patriot Capital Funding, Inc. William E. Alvarez, Jr.,
 (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.
 /s/ William E. Alvarez, Jr.Name: William E. Alvarez, Jr.Date: August 14, 2009
§ 1499.16 Suspension and termination of agreements. ( a ) CCC may suspend or terminate an agreement if it determines that: ( 1 ) One of the bases in 2 CFR 200.339 or 200.340 for suspension or termination by CCC has been satisfied;
( 2 ) The continuation of the assistance provided under the agreement is no longer necessary or desirable; or
( 3 ) Storage facilities are inadequate to prevent spoilage or waste of the donated commodities, or distribution of the donated commodities will result in a substantial disincentive to or interference with domestic production or marketing in the target country.
( b ) The termination provisions in 2 CFR 200.340 and 200.341 will apply to an agreement.
( c ) If an agreement is terminated, the recipient: ( 1 ) Is responsible for the security and integrity of any undistributed donated commodities and must dispose of such commodities only as agreed to by CCC;
( 2 ) Is responsible for any sale proceeds, CCC-provided funds, interest, or program income that have not been disbursed and must use or return them only as agreed to by CCC; and
( 3 ) Must comply with any closeout and post-closeout provisions specified in the agreement and 2 CFR 200.344 and 200.345.
[81 FR 62605, Sept. 12, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 45060, Aug. 28, 2019; 87 FR 53368, Aug. 31, 2022]
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer****Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended **September 30, 2006**(the “Report”) of **Patriot Capital Funding, Inc.**(the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, **Richard P. Buckanavage,**the Chief Executive Officerand President of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.       /s/ Richard P. Buckanavage Name: Richard P. Buckanavage    Date: November 14, 2006
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

###### Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 1421

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart E of part 1421 appear at 74 FR 15656, Apr. 7, 2009.

#### § 1421.412 Powers of attorney.

DMAs may hold a power of attorney from a producer allowing the DMA to sign MAL and LDP documents for the producer, but DMAs may obtain and hold such powers only in accordance with the requirements of CCC governing such powers.

[70 FR 33799, June 10, 2005. Redesignated at 74 FR 15656, Apr. 7, 2009]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Kraton
Polymers LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Registrant), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 (Form 10-Q) of the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Kraton.

Date: November 12, 2009



By:

/s/    KEVIN M.
FOGARTYKevin M. FogartyPresident and Chief Executive Officer




By:

/s/    STEPHEN E.
TREMBLAYStephen E. Tremblay Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Kraton Polymers LLC and will be retained by them and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)
ex10-2.htm


 


Exhibit 10.2


 



RUBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY


P.O. Box 1241


Grass Valley, CA  95945







March 19, 2013







Perry Leopold, CEO


North Bay Resources Inc.


P.O. Box 162


Skippack, PA  19474







Modification and Extension Agreement







Dear Perry,







This letter is to formalize certain modifications in the note payable to Ruby Development Company ("RDC") by North Bay Resources ("NBRI").







The Parties hereby agree that the due date of the note, currently due on June 30, 2013, is extended as provided herein, and that the Parties are adjusting the sale price for the property represented by the note payable by NBRI to RDC and modifying the terms of the note as follows:







1.The interest rate on the note is increased to SIX PERCENT (6%) on April 1, 2013;







2.The monthly payments on the note are increased to FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($15,000.00) principal and interest for each of the three payments due and payable on April 1, 2013, May 1, 2013, and June 1, 2013;







3.The price and remaining balance of the note are increased by ONE HUNDRED SIXTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($160,000.00) on April 1, 2013;







4.The monthly payments on the note are increased to TWENTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($20,000.00) principal and interest beginning with the payment due and payable on July 1, 2013, and continuing thereafter;







5. In addition to the regular payments on the note provided herein, NBRI shall pay RDC a payment on the note in the amount of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) on or before December 30, 2013;







6.NBRI shall pay to RDC FORTY PERCENT (40%) of any and all EB-5 related funds received by NBRI until the unpaid balance of the note is paid in full.  Such payments made to RDC shall be applied toward the note, and, if received by RDC in 2013, shall be credited toward the payment provided in Paragraph 5 above;


 




  





  











  











7. The interest rate on the note shall be increased to EIGHT PERCENT (8%) on January 1, 2015; and,







8. The remaining unpaid balance of the note shall be due and payable in full on or before December 30, 2015.












Yours truly,












RUBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

















By:           /s/ W.R. Frederking                                          


W. R. “Rick” Frederking, Partner












Acknowledged and Agreed this 28th day of March, 2013:







North Bay Resources, Inc.

















By:           /s/ Perry Leopold                                              


Perry Leopold, President and CEO
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with this AnnualReport of GreeneStone Healthcare Corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, asfiled with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Shawn E. Leon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

 

Date: April 14, 2016

GreeneStone Healthcare Corporation

 

by:/s/ *Shawn E. Leon*

Shawn E. Leon

Chief Executive Officer