alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Edward D. SULTAN, Respondent. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,, v. Olga L. SULTAN, Respondent.

No. 13804.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 10, 1954.

H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson, Joseph F. Goetten, Meyer Rothwacks, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Charles W. Davis, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Milton Cades, Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades, J. Russell Cades, Eugene H. Beebe, Honolulu, Hawaii, for respondents.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and BONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue seeks review of two decisions of the Tax Court — a decision redetermining the income tax liability of Edward D. Sultan for the calendar years 1944, 1945 and 1946 and a decision redetermining the income tax liability of Olga L. Sultan for the calendar year 1946. The decisions are affirmed on the grounds and for the reasons stated in the Tax Court’s findings and opinion, Sultan v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 715.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1465.8 Technical services provided by qualified personnel not affiliated with USDA. ( a ) NRCS may use the services of qualified TSPs in performing its responsibilities for technical assistance.
( b ) Participants may use technical services from qualified personnel of other Federal, State, local agencies, Indian Tribes, or individuals who are certified as TSPs by NRCS.
( c ) Technical services provided by qualified personnel not affiliated with USDA may include, but are not limited to: conservation planning; conservation practice survey, layout, design, installation, and certification; and information, education, and training for producers, and related technical services as defined in 7 CFR part 652.
( d ) NRCS retains approval authority of work done by non-NRCS personnel for the purpose of approving AMA payments.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer ofGladstone Investment Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the datehereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofThe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2006 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith bythe Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 1, 2006
| /s/ Harry Brill          |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
| Harry Brill              |   |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer |   |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14 Certification 

 

I, Gary L. Ocepek, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ottawa Savings Bancorp, Inc., 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: June 30, 2005
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Report of Castle Arch Real Estate Investment Company, L.L.C. a California limited liability company (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I, Kirby D. Cochran, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:  a. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  b. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Kirby D. Cochran Kirby D. Cochran, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  Dated November 13, 2006
#### § 17.11 Recordkeeping and access to records.

Suppliers and agents of the participant or importer shall keep accurate books, records and accounts with respect to all contracts entered into hereunder, including those pertaining to ocean transportation-related services and records of all payments by suppliers to representatives of the importer or participant, if CCC finances any part of the ocean freight. Suppliers and agents shall permit authorized representatives of the U.S. Government to have access to their premises during regular hours to inspect, examine, audit and make copies of such books, records and accounts. Suppliers and agents shall retain such records until the expiration of three years after final payment under such contracts.
**Exhibit 32**

      **Written Statement  of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant  to Rule 13a-14(b)  under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350**

Each of the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and President and the Chief Financial Officer, of Microlog Corporation, hereby certifies that, on the date hereof: 

| 1.    | The annual report on Form 10-KSB of Microlog Corporation for the twelve months ended October 31, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.    | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Microlog Corporation.                                                                                                                                                      |

| Date: January 29, 2004 |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ W. Joseph Brookman                |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                   |   |   |   |   |   |                                       |
|                   |   |   |   |   |   | W. Joseph Brookman                    |
|                   |   |   |   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |   |   |   |   |   |                                  |
| Date: January 29, 2004 |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ Charles B. Ford, Jr.              |
|                   |   |   |   |   |   |                                       |
|                   |   |   |   |   |   | Charles B. Ford, Jr.                  |
|                   |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing. 

----
Presidential Documents

12793 

Federal Register 

Vol. 86, No. 41 

Thursday, March 4, 2021 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of March 2, 2021 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Ukraine 

On March 6, 2014, by Executive Order 13660, the President declared a 

national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 

threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of persons that undermine democratic 

processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, 

sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation 

of its assets. 

On March 16, 2014, the President issued Executive Order 13661, which 

expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 

13660, and found that the actions and policies of the Government of the 

Russian Federation with respect to Ukraine undermine democratic processes 

and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, 

and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets. 

On March 20, 2014, the President issued Executive Order 13662, which 

further expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive 

Order 13660, as expanded in scope in Executive Order 13661, and found 

that the actions and policies of the Government of the Russian Federation, 

including its purported annexation of Crimea and its use of force in Ukraine, 

continue to undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine; 

threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; 

and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets. 

On December 19, 2014, the President issued Executive Order 13685, to 

take additional steps to address the Russian occupation of the Crimea region 

of Ukraine. 

On September 20, 2018, the President issued Executive Order 13849, to 

take additional steps to implement certain statutory sanctions with respect 

to the Russian Federation. 

The actions and policies addressed in these Executive Orders continue to 

pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign 

policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared 

on March 6, 2014, and the measures adopted on that date, on March 16, 

2014, on March 20, 2014, on December 19, 2014, and on September 20, 

2018, to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond March 

6, 2021. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 13660. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with MEMO_FR
12794 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 41 / Thursday, March 4, 2021 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

March 2, 2021. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04759 

Filed 3–3–21; 1:00 pm] 

Billing code 3295–F1–P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with MEMO_FRBIDEN.EPS</GPH>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132003 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132003 

 COA: 270669 

Wayne CC: 05-002681-01

RICKEY ARNELL TURK,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
§ 15a.430 Financial assistance. ( a ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, in providing financial assistance to any of its students, a recipient shall not: ( 1 ) On the basis of sex, provide different amounts or types of such assistance, limit eligibility for such assistance that is of any particular type or source, apply different criteria, or otherwise discriminate;
( 2 ) Through solicitation, listing, approval, provision of facilities, or other services, assist any foundation, trust, agency, organization, or person that provides assistance to any of such recipient's students in a manner that discriminates on the basis of sex; or
( 3 ) Apply any rule or assist in application of any rule concerning eligibility for such assistance that treats persons of one sex differently from persons of the other sex with regard to marital or parental status.
( b ) *Financial aid established by certain legal instruments.* ( 1 ) A recipient may administer or assist in the administration of scholarships, fellowships, or other forms of financial assistance established pursuant to domestic or foreign wills, trusts, bequests, or similar legal instruments or by acts of a foreign government that require that awards be made to members of a particular sex specified therein; Provided, that the overall effect of the award of such sex-restricted scholarships, fellowships, and other forms of financial assistance does not discriminate on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) To ensure nondiscriminatory awards of assistance as required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, recipients shall develop and use procedures under which: ( i ) Students are selected for award of financial assistance on the basis of nondiscriminatory criteria and not on the basis of availability of funds restricted to members of a particular sex;
( ii ) An appropriate sex-restricted scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance is allocated to each student selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section; and
( iii ) No student is denied the award for which he or she was selected under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section because of the absence of a scholarship, fellowship, or other form of financial assistance designated for a member of that student's sex.
( c ) *Athletic scholarships.* ( 1 ) To the extent that a recipient awards athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid, it must provide reasonable opportunities for such awards for members of each sex in proportion to the number of students of each sex participating in interscholastic or intercollegiate athletics.
( 2 ) A recipient may provide separate athletic scholarships or grants-in-aid for members of each sex as part of separate athletic teams for members of each sex to the extent consistent with this paragraph (c) and § 15a.450.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7377
JOSEPH PHILLIP SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MACK JARVIS; LYNN PHILLIPS; FRANKLIN FREEMAN; LLOYD W. PARKER; MARY HINES, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-97-570-5-H-3) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Phillip Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the dist rictcourt's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Jarvis , No.CA-97-570-5-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 26, 1997; Sept. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
15.1


Patrizio
      & Zhao, LLCCertified
      Public Accountants and Consultants
              
              322
      Route 46 WestParsippany,
      NJ 07054Tel:  (973)
      882-8810Fax:
      (973) 882-0788www.pzcpa.com







October
29, 2008





U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission


Division
of Corporate Finance


100 F.
Street, N.E.


Washington,
D.C. 20549








To Whom
It May Concern:





We are
aware that JPAK Group, Inc. has included our report dated May 8, 2008, (Except
for Note 1, 3, 15 and 16, as to which the date is October 29, 2008), in its
10Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. We are also aware of our
responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.





Yours
truly,








/s/
Patrizio & Zhao, LLC








PATRIZIO
& ZHAO, LLC


Certified
Public Accountants and Consultants





Parsippany,
New Jersey
§ 1484.55 Advances. ( a ) *Policy.* In general, CCC operates the Cooperator program on a reimbursable basis.
( b ) *Exception.* Upon request, CCC may make two types of advance payments to a Cooperator. The first is a revolving fund operating advance provided by CCC only to Cooperators with foreign offices supported with project funds. The second is a special advance payment used to pay an impending large cost item. CCC will provide this type of advance expense payment in lieu of direct payments by CCC to vendors or other third parties. All Cooperators, with or without project fund-supported foreign offices, are eligible to request special advance payments. CCC will not make any special advance payment to a Cooperator where a special advance is outstanding from a prior program year. When approving a request for an advance, CCC may require the Cooperator to carry adequate fidelity bond coverage when the absence of such coverage is considered to create an unacceptable risk to the interests of the Cooperator program. Whether an “unacceptable risk” exists in a particular situation will depend on a number of factors, such as, the Cooperator's history of performance in the Cooperator program, the Cooperator's perceived financial stability and resources, and any other factors presented in the particular situation that may reflect on the Cooperator's responsibility or the riskiness of its activities.
( c ) *Interest.* A Cooperator shall deposit and maintain in an insured account in the United States all funds advanced by CCC. The account shall be interest-bearing, unless the exceptions in 2 CFR part 200 apply. Interest earned by the Cooperator on funds advanced by CCC is not program income. Up to $500 of interest earned per year may be retained by the Cooperator for administrative expenses. Any additional interest earned on Federal advance payments shall be remitted annually to the appropriate entity as required in 2 CFR part 200.
( d ) *Refunds due CCC.* A Cooperator shall fully expend all advances on approved activities within 90 calendar days after the date of disbursement by CCC. By the end of the 90 calendar days, the Cooperator must submit reimbursement claims to offset the advance and submit a check made payable to CCC for any unexpended balance. The Cooperator shall make such payment in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise approved in advance by CCC.
#### § 1217.61 Independent evaluation.

At least once every five years, the Board shall authorize and fund from funds otherwise available to the Board, an independent evaluation of the effectiveness of the Order and the programs conducted by the Board pursuant to the Act. The Board shall submit to the Secretary, and make available to the public, the results of each periodic independent evaluation conducted under this paragraph.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

July 18, 2018

Order 

Clerk

July 18, 2018

154442(176)

ALI BAZZI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

GENEX PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. and 

ELITE CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, PC,

Intervening Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

TRANSMEDIC, LLC,

Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 154442

v COA: 320518

Wayne CC: 13-000659-NF

SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant/Third-Party

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

HALA BAYDOUN BAZZI and

MARIAM BAZZI,

Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of appellee Sentinel Insurance Company 

to file a reply to the amicus curiae brief of the Michigan Association for Justice and the 

joint amicus curiae brief of Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital, LLC, and Jamie 

Letkemann is GRANTED. The reply submitted on December 27, 2017, is accepted for 

filing.