alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[109th Congress Public Law 192]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ192.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 300]]

Public Law 109-192
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
201 North 3rd Street in Smithfield, North Carolina, as the ``Ava Gardner 
         Post Office''. <<NOTE: Mar. 20, 2006 -  [H.R. 3439]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 
North 3rd Street in Smithfield, North Carolina, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Ava Gardner Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ava Gardner Post Office''.

    Approved March 20, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3439:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    Oct. 6, considered and passed House.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Mar. 3, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Database # Models 972

Total # of Models 2050
PER PER PER PER PER PER 10 25 40 50 55 70 Database Models Failing 97 243 389 486 535 680 Industry Models Failing 205 512 820102511271435 Models Known to Be Dropped 34 67 105 127 137 164 Failing Units for these MFGs 52 108 165 201 221 281 % Dropped for these MFG 66% 62% 64% 63% 62% 58% % Dropped for Remaining MFGs 10%7.5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Failing Units for these MFGs 153 404 655 824 9061154 Remaining Models to Be Dropped 15 30 33 41 45 58 Total Failing Models 205 512 820102511271435 Total Dropped Models 50 97 138 168 182 221 Total % Dropped 24% 19% 17% 16% 16% 15%PER

85826 1742
182 324 56% 5% 1418 71
1742 253 15%
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Roger I. MacFarlane, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of UTi Worldwide Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15 (f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.December 18, 2006   /s/ Roger I. MacFarlane   Roger I. MacFarlane  Chief Executive Officer
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., Plaintiffs

- Appellees

v.

ACRONIS, INC., Defendant

- Appellant

______________________

2020

- 2149

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:15

- cv

- 01001

- RWS

- KNM, Judge Robert Schroeder

, III.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
A

ARON J ACOBS , Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Boston, MA, argued for plaintiffs

- appellees.

J ANINE A. C ARLAN , Arent Fox, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellant. Also represented by J ASJ IT S. V IDWAN

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is Case: 20-2149 Document: 56 Page: 1 Filed: 07/20/2021O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , L OURIE , and O’M ALLEY , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

July 20, 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 20-2149 Document: 56 Page: 2 Filed: 07/20/2021
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report of Ceridian Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald L. Turner,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ RONALD L.  TURNER                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | Ronald L. Turner                                  |
|   | *Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|   | April 20, 2005                               |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronicversion of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to Ceridian Corporation and will be retained by Ceridian Corporationand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of HLines Finance Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 25, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles G. Raymond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ CHARLES G.
RAYMOND               
|Charles G. Raymond                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        

April 26, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1626 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1626

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit the Securities 
and Exchange Commission from issuing rules requiring the disclosure of 
           an issuer's expenditures for political activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2013

  Mrs. Wagner (for herself and Mr. Garrett) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit the Securities 
and Exchange Commission from issuing rules requiring the disclosure of 
           an issuer's expenditures for political activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Focusing the SEC on Its Mission 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING DISCLOSURE OF POLITICAL EXPENDITURES.

    Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (78m) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
    ``(s) Prohibition on Requiring Disclosure of Political 
Expenditures.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Commission shall not require the 
        disclosure by an issuer of any political expenditure.
            ``(2) Definition.--The term `political expenditure' means--
                    ``(A) an independent expenditure, as such term is 
                defined in section 301(17) of the Federal Election 
                Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(17));
                    ``(B) an electioneering communication, as such term 
                is defined in section 304(f)(3) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 
                434(f)(3)) and any other public communication (as such 
                term is defined in section 301(22) of such Act (2 
                U.S.C. 431(22))) that would be an electioneering 
                communication if it were a broadcast, cable, or 
                satellite communication; or
                    ``(C) dues or other payments to trade associations 
                or organizations described in section 501(c) of the 
                Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and exempt from tax under 
                section 501(a) of such Code that are, or could 
                reasonably be anticipated to be, used or transferred to 
                another association or organization for the purposes 
                described in clauses (i) or (ii).''.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPrincipal Investigator in a Box: Version 1.2 DocumentationPrincipal Investigator (PI) in a box is a computer system designed to help optimize the scientific results of experiments that are performed in space. The system will assist the astronaut experimenters in the collection and analysis of experimental data, recognition and pursuit of 'interesting' results, optimal use of the time allocated to the experiment, and troubleshooting of the experiment apparatus. This document discusses the problems that motivate development of 'PI-in-a-box', and presents a high- level system overview and a detailed description of each of the modules that comprise the current version of the system.Document ID19920017385Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJurine Adolph*(Lockheed Martin (United States) Bethesda, Maryland, United States)*Rajiv Bhatnagar*(Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States)*Silvano P Colombano*(Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)*Michael Compton*(Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)*Richard Frainer*(Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)*Nicolas Groleau*(Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States)*Kritina Holden*(Lockheed Martin (United States) Bethesda, Maryland, United States)*Sen-Hao Lai*(Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States)*Chih-Chao Lam*(Stanford University Stanford, California, United States)*Meera Manahan*(Lockheed Martin (United States) Bethesda, Maryland, United States)*Peter Szolovits*(Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States)*Irving C Statler*(Ames Research Center Mountain View, California, United States)*Lawrence Young*(Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1990Publication InformationPublisher: National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSubject CategoryComputer SystemsReport/Patent NumberFIA-90-11-05-1NASA-TM-107886NAS 1.15:107886Accession Number92N26628Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920017385.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

November 18 , 2021.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00520

- CV

IN RE RYAN ZIMMERMAN , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 309th District Court Harris County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. 2013

- 62926



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 15, 2021 , relator Ryan Zimmerman filed a petition for writ of

m andamus , and has since filed an amended petition in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the amended petition, relator
asks this Cou rt to compel the Honorable Linda Dunson, presiding judge of the
309th District Court of Harris County
, to set aside the trial court ’ s J une 24, 2021,2

order holding relator in contempt for possession and access violations and failure to pay child support.

R elator has not establ ished that he is entitle d to mandamus relief. Accordingly , w e deny re lator ’ s peti tion for writ of mandamus without prejudice to refiling of same

.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Wise, Bou rliot, and Zimmerer.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1410.56 Division of payments and provisions about tenants and sharecroppers. ( a ) Payments received under this part will be divided as specified in the applicable CRP contract and CCC will ensure that producers who would have an interest in acreage being offered receive treatment that is equitable. CCC may refuse to enter into a contract when there is a disagreement among producers seeking enrollment as to a producer's eligibility to participate in the CRP contract as a tenant and there is insufficient evidence to indicate whether the producer seeking participation as a tenant does or does not have an interest in the acreage offered for enrollment in CRP.
( b ) CCC may remove an operator or tenant from a CRP contract when: ( 1 ) The operator or tenant requests in writing to be removed from the CRP contract;
( 2 ) The operator or tenant files for bankruptcy and the trustee or debtor in possession fails to affirm the contract, to the extent permitted by applicable bankruptcy laws;
( 3 ) The operator or tenant dies during the CRP contract period and the administrator of the estate fails to succeed to the contract; or
( 4 ) A court of competent jurisdiction orders the removal from the CRP contract of the operator or tenant and such order is received by CCC.
( c ) In addition to paragraph (b) of this section, tenants must maintain their tenancy throughout the CRP contract period in order to remain on a CRP contract. Tenants who fail to maintain tenancy on the acreage under CRP contract, including failure to comply with applicable State law, may be removed from a CRP contract by CCC. CCC will assume the tenancy is being maintained unless notified otherwise by a party to the CRP contract.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. §1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of the Cryoport, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Berry, CEO,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
Peter Berry


PETER
BERRY


CEO,
President


June 30,
2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,152

EX PARTE ROBERT J. JAMES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 4760-A IN THE 1ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM NEWTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault of a child and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Ninth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. James v. State, No. 09-01-500-CR, (Tex. App. – Beaumont, 2002, no pet.) (not

designated for publication). 

Applicant contends that appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel

failed to advise him of right to petition for discretionary review pro se. 
2

Based on our independent review of the record, we find that appellate counsel failed to advise

Applicant of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex

parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Relief if granted. Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for

discretionary review of the judgment of the Ninth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 09-00500-CR that

affirmed his conviction in Case No. 4760-A from the 1 Judicial District Court of Newton County. st

Applicant shall file petition for discretionary review with the Ninth Court of Appeals within 30 days

of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: May 6, 2009

Do not publish
#### § 1222.10 Kraft process.

*Kraft process* means a process that transforms wood into a high quality strong pulp for making paper and paper-based packaging.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ForgeHouse, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John
      Britchford-Steel, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, and
      I,
      Jorge Vargas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the
      best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





i.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to ForgeHouse, Inc. and will be
      retained by ForgeHouse, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





**/S/*****JOHN BRITCHFORD-STEEL*****JOHN
                BRITCHFORD-STEEL****CHIEF
                EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR****FORGEHOUSE,
                INC.****MAY
                20, 2008**




**/S/*****JORGE
                VARGAS*****JORGE
                VARGAS****CHIEF
                FINANCIAL OFFICER****FORGEHOUSE,
                INC.****MAY
                20, 2008**
#### § 1219.34 Failure to nominate.

In any case in which producers or importers fail to nominate individuals for appointment to the Board, the Secretary may appoint individuals to fill vacancies from the appropriate segments of the industry.