IV/io/LOll 08:58 FAX 2024835142 FAA -t OMS 14\001/033

Wll.KERSON

HOZUBIN l K .!>TIUET, /!UI'1Y. •oa li(.liOKAGL AK 99!01 TEL (:107) Z7(>.SZP7 FAX: (!107)**171J.5~1** ··--·



### u.s. 

### DEPARTMENT OF 

# TRANSPORftECEIVED OFFICE 

### OF HEARINGS 

# t;; ' WASHINGTON, DC In the Matter of: ) ) 

## OCT 2 12011 

# HEARING DOCKET TGI FRJ!;IGHT



# ------------------ )FAA Docket No. CPlONM001/. )OMS NO. 

### FAA-2010-1079 )Judge 

### RICHARD C. GOODWIN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR DECISION 

### The FAA moved for a ruling from this Court that the epoxy at issue in this matter is regulated as a 

### hazardous material for purposes of transportation. TGI 

### opposes this motion. There are genuine issues of material fact, and the 

### FAA has not met its burden 

### of proof. The mution should be denied, as this issue is appropric:tte for the 

### hearing in this 1natter. I. 

### FACTS TGl Freight has been a dangerous qoods agent for Parsons Corporation since June 2009. On 

### or about February 19, 2010, TGI freight received, along with other items, four manufacturers' combination packaging (shipping containers) of Pro-poxy 400 Epoxy resin. [Exhibit 1, Affidavit of Todd Clark.} None of the packages dispJayed either a consumP.r commodity rnar.king or limited quantities markings. [Exhibits 1- 4, Affidavit and photos.] Further inspection found that the inner containers did display a WHMIS Class D, division 2 symbol that warns of possible poisonous reactions to a person who is repeatedly10/28/2011 09:57 FAX 2024835142 FAA + OMS 141002/033

\'ILKERSON 

### HOZUBIN 1.: S'llULr. SUITE**40~** ::HOR4Gl::, AK 9!lSO l 'EL:**(~7) :t7~5297**  llX: (907)**276-5~~1** 

### exposed to small amounts, buL they did not display the WHMIS Class B symbol for flammable/combustible material. (Exhibits 1-4, 

### Affidavit and photos.] 

### In other words, the only marking indicat.ed that the material may be irritating to 

### the skin after prolonged exposure. [Exhibits 

### 2-3.1 II. 

### STANDARD The motion is 

### made pursuant to 11 CFR 

### 13.218(f) 

### (5) which specifically states:

...The administ.ralive law judge shall grant 

### a party's motion for decis.ion if 

### the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions,**matt~rs** 

### that the ad.rrd. nistrativc 

### law j 

### ud.ge has officlally 

### noticed, or evidence introduced during the hearing show 

### tlla t there is 

### no genuine issue of material f:Clct and that the party making the motion 

### is 6ntitled to 

### a decision as a matter of law. The party 

### making the motion for decision has the burden o£ 

### showing that there is 

### r:o genuine issue of material fact disputed by 

### the parties. The F'AA 

### has the bur.den to demonstrate that there 

### are no gcnui.ne issues of material fact 

### and that it 2s 

### enlitled to judgment as a matter of law. The 

### FAA fails to meet this burden. 

### II. ARGUMENT Not surprisingly, the 

### FAA submitted 

### a copy 

### of the MSDS for the epoxy. First, the MSDS is hearsay. While 14 CFR 13.2?2(c) 

### allows for hearsay in these proceedings, it should nol be given
as much weight as evldence, such as the photos of the product

In the**Matl~r** of**T~!** Freight DQcket. No. CPlONMOOl/. Page 210/26/2011 08:57 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS**~** 003/033

WILKF.RSON

HOZUBIN to KSTREET, SUITE**~os** NCHORAGE, AK moJ;OJ**lF~:** (907)**27~~7** FAX: (901)**:.r/G-~:t!ll** 

### and packaging, the packaging itself, and the testimony of Lhose who actually inspected the product prior to shipping. Second, there is no requirement under 49 CPR that a shipper refer to a product MSOS prior Lo**shippi~g.** 

### An MSDS is an OSHA form referenced in CFR-29 and is even not required lo have DOT information on it, which lS 

### lj.kely the reason there is no requiremGnt to refer Lo it under 49 

## c:R. Finally, the MSDS a$ 

### provided by the FAA is inconsistent with the marking and labeling of the shipping containers and the epoxy containers themselves. A shipper should be able to rely on the manufacturer's representations on the labels and markings. In this instance, the manufacturer chose to send the epoxy in unmarked white boxes. None of the packages displayed either
a consumer commodity markj_ng as required 

### by CFR-49 

### 17/..316 (a)
or limited quanlities markings as required by 

### 172.301 and 

### 172.315. Further, the inner containers, the tubes 

# of epoxy, did display a WHMIS Class D, division /. symbol that warns of possible poisonous reactions to a p6rson who is**rcpe~tedly** 

### exposed to small amounts, but they did not display the WHMIS Class B symbol for flammable/combustible material. The only marking indicated that the material may be irritating to the skin after prolonged exposure. 'fhe presence of the Class**~r**

In**th~** Matter of TGI Freight Docket No. CP10NM0012 ·- P<:Lge 310/28/2011 08:57 FAX 2024835142 FAA + OMS @004/033

Wli..K£RSON

HOZUBIN :no KSTREET,SIJJTI-:105 ANOIORA<il::, AK 99501

TEL: (90'1)**~71i-52~7** fAX: <007)**~7c.r.29J** 

### divis.:.on 2 symbol is 

### a consumer waL·nlng and does not equal DOT hazard class. Because of 

### the**~bsence** 

### of the required information, 

### TGl Freight considered the Pro-poxy 400 

### to bG a non-regulated item and shipped it as such. TGI Freight appropriately relied on the information provided by the manufacturer of the product on both the shipping boxes and the tubes 

### of epoxy, 'l'he ouLer packaging was not marked with 

### a proper shipping 

### name,
as 

### required by 17?.300/172.301, or UN/NA number in a diamond, as required by 172.315, for limited quantities by nonair transport. lt was 

### also nol. marked 

### with Consumer Cor:unodity, ORM-D. As 

### shown by tha photos, there are no markings or labels of any kind on the packaging for surface shipment. This is in direct violation of 49 CFR by the manufacturer. Further, the epoxy is received at AS&G 

### from the manufaclurer in the same whi.te boxes that are shown in Exhibils l and 2 

### that have no 

### markings. [Exhibits 1 

### and 4.] 

### Additionally, the over-packs (streLch-wrapped pallets) had no markings as required by 49 

### CFR 172.300 and 172.301. [Exhibits 1 and 4.] 

### Unitex, the manufacturer, has taken the position that because of the small quantity in the 9 oz**tub~~,** 

### they do noc. require marking, labeling, or placement of 

### WHMIS symbols for

In the**M~ttcr** of TGI Freight Docket No. C:Pl0NMOOl2-
..**P01g~** 410/28/2011 09:57 FAX 2024935142 FAA -. OMS @005/033



### WILKf'RSON

HOZUBIN 31**~** k STIU::£1'. Sl.JITE 1115 ANCiklRAGE.AK9t50J

TU.: (l)OT)**~7<;-5~~7** FAX: (907)**%76-<i~** l 

### surface shipment. This is despite the**f~ct** 

### that re5earch has shown that the exact same product jn larg0r 28 oz tubes is labeled with multiple flammable warnings on tb.e tubes. The fault fo.r what occurred lies with the manufacturer and not TCI Freight. Finally, it should be noted, that while the FAA argues that TGI admitted that it 

### did not follow its own procedures in this instance, nowhere has TGI ever admitted that it dld not follow its own procedures. TGI followed p.x:·oper protocol. IV. CONCLUSION 

### TGT Freight acted appropriately based on the information provided to lt on the manufucturer's shipping containers. Had the cartons or even inner containers been properly marked, labeled, or embossed with t.he WHMJS symbols, as required, TGI Freight would have properly declared thern. The fault for what occurred lies wilh lhe manufacturer and not with TGI Freight. Based on the foregoi.ng, there is clearly a disputed J.ssue of material fact--is the marking and labeling on the packaging correct, o.r ls 

### the hearsay MSDS, that conflicts wiLh the marking and labeling, correct? This is a material question of fact appropriate for determination only at the hearing in this matter. The FAA**h~s** 

### not met its burden of proof, and its motion should be deni.ed.

In the Matter of TGI Freight**Dock~t** No. CP10NM0012 Page 5**IU/~o/2011** 08:57 FAX 2024835142 FAA -> OMS



### WIJ.J\ERSON

HOZUBIN 110 K ST!t£ET. SUITE 4M \NCHOitAGE, AK**,!Jr~n**

TJ:l.; (907)**:7&.:;~7** fAX: 1007)**~7&r.:!..~l** 

### DATED this 

# J

# 3 J"-d-ay of 0

_ October, 2 11. WILKERSON HOZUBIN 

### Att.orn)'Ys By:

CERTIFICATE OF**SER~CE** I hereby certify**th~t o~**  the 

# n·day of October, 2011, .:! true and correct copy of Lhe**ro~egoing** R 

### AK**w~s f~x~d** **~nd** mailed to the following: Original Plus l Copy**~~deral** Aviacion Admini9tration BOO Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright**Building-Suit~** 2Wl000 (202) 493-5142

- f<lX One Copx Howard L. Martin, Jr. 

## /)

RG:gional Counsel,**Ottic~::c** ot Regional Coun::>el, AAL-7 Aloskan Reqion Federal**Avia~ion** Administration 222 w**7'~** Avenue JH4 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 {901) 211-2800

- fax Cheryl M. Jones, Sr. Attorney**Otfic~** of Regional Counsel Alaska Region Federal Aviation**A&~inistration** 222 West 7th Avenue Jll4 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 (907) 271-2800

- fax The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,**Adm~nistrative** Law Judge U.S.**DAp~rtment** ot**Tr~n~portation** Office of Hearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Building, Ground Floor, Room El2-320 Washington, DC 20590 (202) 366-7536

- fax
WILKERSON**HOZ~BJN**

tn the Matter of TGI Freight**Du~ket** No. CP10NM0012 Page 6 @008/033

Freight10/26/2011 08:57 FAX 2024835142 FAA -> OMS

U_$_ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC In the Matter of: )
TGI FREIGHT ) 

### )FAA Docket No. 

### CP10NM0012 )DMS 

### NO. FAA-2010-1079

______________________________)Judge RICHARD C. GOODWIN**AFFIDAVI~** OF TODD CLARK STATE 

### OF ALASKA ss. THIRD JODICIAL DISTRICT 141007/033

Todd Clark, being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and states as follows; 1. I 

### am the owner of TGI Freight. This atfidavit 

### is based on 

### my personal knowledge 

### of the matters set 

### forth herein. 

### 2- On or about February 

### 19, 2010, TGI Freight received, along with other items, four manufacturers' combination**p~ckaging** (shipping containers) of Pro-poxy 400 Epoxy resin. None of the packages displayed either a consumer commodity marking as required by CFR-49 172.316 (a} or limited quantitleB markings as required by 112.301 o% 172-315 for non-air transportion. 

### 3. Further inspection found that the inner containers did display a 

### WHMIS Class 

### D, division 

### 2 symbol that warns of possibJe poisonous ceactions to a person who 

### is repeatedly exposed to small amounts, buc. Lhey did not display the WIJMJSIV/LO/LOll 08:57 FAX 2024835142 FAA + OMS @008/033



### Class B symbol for flammable/combustible material. The only marking indicated that the material 

### may be irritating to the 

### skin after prolonged exposure. 4. 

### The outer packaging was not marked with 

### a proper shipping name, as required by 172.300/172.301, or UN/NA number in a diamond, as required by 

### 172.315, for limited quantities by non-air transport. It 

### was also not marked with Consumer Commodity, 

### ORM-0. 5. I spoke with Un.:i.tex, the manufacturer, of the epoxy 

### at issue. Unitex took the position that because of the small quantity in the 9 

### oz tubes thaL 

### wc:re .shipped, the containers do not require marking, labeling, or placement of WHMIS**~ymbols** 

### for surface shipment. 

### 6. I then did further research on 

### this matter. 

### My 

### research showed that the 

### exact same product in 

### larqer 28 oz tubes is labeled with multiple flammable warnings on the tubes. 

### 7. Finally, 

### Exhibit 4 consists 

### of photographs 

### I took at AS&G !Alaska Sand and Gravel) of the epoxy at issue as it is received at AS&G from the**rnanuf~cturer.** 

### It is received at AS&G from the manufacturer in the same whiLe boxes that are shown in 

### Exhibits 1 and 2 that have no markings. Additionally the over packs (stretch wrapped pallets) had no markings as required by 

### J 

### 72.300 and 301.

In**th~** Matter of TGI Freight Docket No. CP10NM001210/28/2011 08:57 FAX 2024835142 FAA + OMS 141008/033



### FORTHER YOOR AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.

DATED this 13th day of October, 2011, at Anchorage, Alaska.**CBR~IFICATE** OF SERVXCE I**h~r~by c~rtify**  LhaL on the 

### J3_ day of October, 201L a true and correc L copy of l11.: foregoing was mailed to the**follo~ing:** Original Plus l Copy Federal Aviation Administration BOO Independence Avenue, 

### s.w. Washington, DC 20591

# ~&-**~ark** 

### --------------



### My Commission

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 W.:i.l.bur Wright Euilding-Suj.t:e< 2Wl 000 One Copx Howard L_ Martin, Jr.**~egional** Counse-l, Offj_c.€1 or Hegional Counsel, AAL-'1 Alaskan Region Federal**~viation** Administration 222 W 7th Avenue H4 Anchorage, AK 99513-7!)87 Tha Honorabl8**Rich~rd** C. Goodwin,**Administrativ~ L~w**  Judge U.S. D€pnrtmcnt ot Transportation Office of Hearings,**~-20** 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Building, Ground Flour, Roorn E12-320 In the Matter of TGI**Freiqh~** Dockel No. CP10NM0012

, ........ 

### --**~ IV/~o/2011**  08:58 FAX 2024935142 FAA

WashingLOft, DC 20590
WILKERSON HO?.UBIN By:

# (?~d __

# 7/rlr1ea=x
9100/7. 12/pl !!.ild!Opp co Men for L>ecision- llrt.

In the Matter of TGI Freight Docket Nc). CPlONM0012 -> OMS @010/03310/26/2011 08:58 FAX 2024835142 FAA

U.S

. DEPARTMENT 01-' TRANSPORTAi!OJ.- ' FEDEIU.L AVIATION ADMIN'JS1'RATIOlf S ccurit.y «nd**H~:sr<luut>** Mnrt'rinls -. OM S 

### 14! 011/033

Photograph shows the entire shipment o1rered to ASAA hy TGIF as cargo. Photograph 

### taken on 

### February 19, 2010, at 1200 hours, by Special Agent, 

### Jeffrey DEITZ using a Fuji FinePix A610 Digital Camera. The picture 

### wao:; downloaded directly from Fujifilm Camera to this document No alterations were made to the photographs other 

### rhan copying 

### them from 

### Lotus Notes 

### to Microsoft Office Word. 

### The custodian 

### ofall photographs exposed and used in this investigation is the 

### Hazardous Materials Branch Office, ANM-740, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057.



### Jtem ofProof5 (Page 1 of5 Pages)


## 300027 lmerviewed/Reviewcd On·-·--------

__ _ J\[**~----** ---- --- By ,Jr:ffcer. I.. Deitz 2010NM730038 FAA P'ona 1600-3'2· 1 0 -661 5'0R OFFlCI.AL tiS£ ONL T10/£6/2011 08 : 58 FA X 202 4935142 FAA

U.S

.**I'YF-PARTM~ NT**  Or<**TRANSPO~TAT£0['( FEDE~**  AVIA1'JON ADMINJSTAATION**s~curity** and H a :r.;ordOL\S**Ma~risls** -. OM S

Photograph shows the four boxe$ ofUnitex Pro-Poxy 400 Adhesive. 141 0 12/ 033

Photograph taken on February 19, 2010, at 1200 hours, by Special Agent, Jeffrey DEITZ using a Fuji 

### fincPix A610 Digital Camera
. The picture was downloaded directly from 

### Fujitilm Camera to this document. No alterations were made to the photographs other than copying them from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Office Word
. 

### 'l11c custodian ofall photographs exposed and used in this investigation is the Ha:cardous Materials Branch Office, 

### ANM-740, 1601 

### Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057
.



### lfem of

### Proof5 (Page 2 of5 Pages) 

## 300028 lntcrviewM/Revicweri On
__ ---- - - --- --- At
_____ ---- By**J~ffrex** L Dciu**~~ilc** No

. ______**.::;20::__,1'-"Q'-'-'NM"'-7""3~00""'3"-'-A** FAA Form 1600-3::1.- l 1?-&GI
- FOH OFnCI.I\L tiS!!; ONLY

# ,.....L**-·-=~**10/28/2011 09 : 59 FAX 2024935142

', . : FAA

U.S

.**DI'~PARTMENT** 01' TRANSPORTATJOW FED};RAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Security and**Haz.~1Jnu~** Mcm:rials

. ' 

### . .-; -. OMS

f.i:j'" For**u~** In Concrets

. StDn.l! Hothnry

.

# (~L'JII#f:j 1-RO-Pf)X:Y.

# 400**"' ~'** **.** Epoq Acryt;no Anduwtn, Gel• ICC::tS RCIPQft**•u~-~~**

Photograph shows one ofthe Unitex**Pro~Poxy** 400 Adhesive Product Labels
.**~013 /033** 

,, ' ' ,'• .

.'· ... , '

' f ' I • , ·:

Photograph taken on February 19, 2010. at 1200 hours, by Special Agent, kftrey DEITZ using a Fuji rinePix A610 Digital Camera. The picture was downloaded directly from Jiujitilm Camera to this document. No alterations were made to the photographs other than copying them from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Office Word. The custodian ofall photographs exposed and used in this investigation**i~** the H&ardous Materials Branch Office, ANM-740, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057.



### 1

tem ofProof

### 5 (Page 3 of5 Pages) 

## 300029 !ntcrvie-..l/Revicwed On-------

---- 

### At--------- B:r ...ldfttY. L Di!il>: FAA Form 1600.32·1 I? M) 

### 151111'" 

# ¢ ..., z91e No ._

# ~2--'S:. 2010NM7300J8 ·· - fOR OFn<:IAJ. URI!: OJIILY**10/~~ 2011**  09 : 59 FAX 20248 35142 FAA

u .S

. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOR'l'l\'l'lCJ>•" FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATIOM S«."rity**~nd Haz;~Tdous**  Mater ial!:

Photograph shows one ofthe ASAA**ir~ight** tags. + OM S**14 /0** **33**

Photograph taken on February 19, 2010, at 1200 hours, by Special Agent, Jeffrey DEITZ using a Fuji FinePix A610 Digital Camera_ The picture was downloaded directly from Fujifilm Camera to this document No alterations were made to the photographs other than copying them from Lotus Notes to Microso11 Office Word. The custodian ofall pholographs exposed and used in this investigation is the**H~dous** Materials Branch Office, ANM-740. 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renlon, WA 98057.

Item ofProof5 (Page 4 of5 Pages) 

## 300030**lntervicurC'<i R~view~**  On

__ _ ----- 1\.t By
___ ___,,_..1**ff~C.Y** L Dcit:.:

### ~ F'il,Nn

. ___ 2010NM730038 r J .,.- FOR ornetAL tN!t: omv

### D~- -,

### ';f (If.'

_ -

### .,S_,10/ 26/2011 08 : 58 FAX 2024835142 FAA

O
.S. DEPART'MJ.;t

- lT OF TRANSPORTATI0r<· · FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION SecuriTy**;~nd** 1-lJ:\Zilrdous Materia l,. + OMS 141015 / 033

Photograph sh()WS the tubes ofllnitcx Pro-Poxy 400 Adhesive inside one ofthe boxes. Photograph taken on February 19, 2010, at 1200 hours, by Special Agent, Jeffrey DEITZ using a fuji FinePix A61 0 Digital Camera. The picture was downloaded directly from**F~jifilm** Camera to this document. No alterations were made to the photographs other than copying them from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Office Word
. The custodian ofall photographs exposed and used in this investigation is the Hazardous Materials Branch Office, ANM-740, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057.



### Item ofProof5 (Page 

### 5 of5 Pages)

lntcrvicwed/Reviewcd Otl

--------- /\t

----- By -!;;ll'rey L Deilx FAA Fo1'111 1600-3l-l l'l·il<>l

## &hl:llt_~-==-"**~fo'ile** No.
__

_ ,..,.- I--.

### -~·-··8€-~ 

## 300031

----·-- 20!0NM7JOO.l§.__

_

f'OR OFFICIAL llSJ: ONLYIUU!:; / 2011 1 0: 15 FAX 2024935142 FAA -> OM S 

### f4J 032 /0 33

WR.KERSON

HOZUBIN 10 K S'JRFF.T, SUITE 405 ,N('.HOKAG£. Ak !lnr.<11

TIL (907)**%7~2~7** I'AX: r.>o>T)**21G ~2~1**  

### U.S. D8PARTMENT OF**TRA~SPORTATlON** 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC In 

### the Matter of: )


### TGT FREICH':' } )FAA 

### Docket No. CP10NM0012 

### )DMS NO. FAA-2010-1079



### ------ _________)Judge RICHARD C. GOODWIN (PROPOSED) ORDER DENYrNG FAA'S MOTION FOR DECISION 

### Huving reviewed the FAA's 

### Motion for.' 

### Decision, and the 

### opposition thereto, this Judge finds the opposilion well taken. There are genuine issues of material fact, and the ?AA is not entitled to this ruling as a matter of law. Th8 motion is DENIED. DAT8D 

### this day of --------' 201.1.



### Honor<lblc Richard C. Goodwi n 

### U.S. Adm1njstrative Law JudgeIV/4.0/LV II 10:15 FAX 2024935142 FAA -> OMS

WILKERSON



### HOZUBIN 10 K s-ma:J',SUITE**~M ~NCJIOR** AC.E. AK ,950I ThL:**~11** %7r.r.z97 t'AX: (90'7)**~76-S29J CE~TIFICATE**  OF**SE~VICE** t**h~rcby** cerLify thaL on the**11~** day of October, 2011, a true (lnd corr·ect copy of the foregoing WdS**fax~d** and**m~iled** to the following: Original**~lus** 1 Copy Federal Aviatior. Adm.inistrat.i.on 800 Tndepcr.dence Aventle, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Dock<"ct Clerk. 1 li.GC-430 Wilbur Wright Bu.ilding-·Suite 2W1000 (?02) 493-514?

- fax One Copy Howard L
. Ma•tin, Jr. Regional Counsel, Off.i.cc: of RegionaL counseL, ML-7 Alc):.>kan Req.i.on Federal Aviation**Admi~istruti on**  ?.22 w 7Lii Avenue ill-1 Anchorage,**~** 99513-7587 (907) 271-2800

- fax Cheryl M. Jones, Sr. Attorney O

ffice of kegional Counsel l\laska 8.egion Federal ll.v)8tion l\dm1nistration 222 West: -;'·" AvemH'. #11 Anchorage, AK 99513-75H7 (90./) 271-2800

- fax 'T'he Honorable Richo.rd c. Goodwin, Ad.m.i.nislrat.ivc Law Judge U.S.**Dep~rtruent** of Transportation Office of**Hearinq~,** M-?0 1200 New Jersey ll.venue, S.E. East Building, Ground Floor, Room F.1 2 -3 20 Washington, DC 20590 (202 ) 366-7536

- fax**WILK~RSON** HOZURIN

. ) ;},·-J J

# r /J

//t.

## By:_fL~!}~,t:;.!.~=-~-· 9100/ !J42 /p.IF>ad/Opp t<
. .> Mr:n for**Den~ion- OTde~** 

In the Mattei? of ' l'GI**~rei** ghl Docket No. CPlONMOOP @033/033