alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      August 4, 2008                                                                         |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|  /s/      Yijun Wang                                                                          |   |   |   |
| Yijun      WangChief      Executive Officer, President, Director(Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
EXHIBIT
32




Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Response Genetics, Inc., (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Form
10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      March 31, 2009
            /s/
      Kathleen DanenbergKathleen
      Danenberg
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
      March 31, 2009
            /s/
      Thomas StankovichThomas
      Stankovich
              Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request. This
certification “accompanies” the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I, Ian Rice, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Intelligentias, Inc. (the Company), certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report);



(2)

Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; and



(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods represented in the Report.



(4)

The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this Report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



(5)

The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):



(i)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(ii)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: 
November 20, 2007



By:

/s/ IAN RICE

Ian Rice

Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 23

- 00055

- CR

IN RE BRYAN STALLWORTH

Original Proceeding

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 30582

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Bryan Stallworth has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in which he

requests that this Court direct the trial court judge in his pending criminal cause to act on

his pro se “Motion to Quash Indictment” and his pro se “Affidavit of Bryan Stallworth” in

which he requests certain dis covery

. 1 Stallworth , however, represents that he has counsel

in his pending criminal cause. Therefore, the trial court is not required to consider and

rule on his pro se motions and requests

. Robinson v. State , 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim.

1 Stallworth’s petition for writ of mandamus has several procedural deficiencies. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.3. It also lacks a proper proof of service. See id. R. 9.5, 52.2. However, because of our disposition and to expedite it, we implement Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 and suspend these rules in this proceeding only. See id. R.

2.In re Stallworth Page 2 App. 2007 ) (“[A] defendant has no right to hybrid representation. . . . [A]s a consequence,

a trial court is free to disregard any pro se motions presented by a defendant who is

represented by counsel.”).

Stallworth’s pro se petition for writ of mandamus is there fore denied. Stallworth ’s

“Motion to Expedite Order” is dismissed as moot.

MATT JOHNSON
Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Johnson , and
Justice Smith

Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed March 1, 2023 Do not publish [OT06]
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00140-CV

MICHELLE T. BRADLEY APPELLANT

V.

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 

ASSOCIATION

APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On May 30, 2012, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible 

for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment 

arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). 

We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and 

provided this court with proof of payment. 

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s 

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want 

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 9, 2012
## Other Youth Topics

## Breadcrumb

            -  Youth Topics 
            -  Opportunity Youth 
            -  Performance Partnership Pilots for Disconnected Youth (P3) 
            -           Round 4 (FY 2018 and FY 2019)      

# Round 4 (FY 2018 and FY 2019)

In this section, find the fourth round (FY 2018 and FY 2019) **Notice Inviting Applications (NIA),**watch the **Round 4 Presentations**, review a **toolkit** (PDF, 24 pages) for identifying and addressing barriers to program implementation, review **examples of programs** potentially eligible for inclusion in pilots as well as programs likely to be ineligible, and learn about **waivers/flexibilities** (PDF, 14 pages).

## Re-Connect Menu

-  Overview 
-  Evaluation 
-  Round 5 (FY 2021) 
-  Round 4 (FY 2018 and FY 2019)    -  P3 Round 4 Presentations 
  -  Round 4 Program List 
-  Round 3 (FY 2016) 
-  Round 2 (FY 2015) 
-  Round 1 (FY 2014) 
-  Background
#### § 1720.11 Servicing.

The Secretary, or other agent of the Secretary on his or her behalf, shall have the right to service the guaranteed bond, and periodically inspect the facilities, assets, books, and accounts of the guaranteed lender or the collateral agent to ascertain compliance with the provisions of the RE Act and the bond documents.

[87 FR 74501, Dec. 6, 2022]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 28, 2015

Order 

Clerk

January 28, 2015

150786 (23)

MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ-ARANGO,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 150786

COA: 322899

SAGINAW CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 

WARDEN, 

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $95.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$280.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
#### § 1700.100 Purpose.

This subpart establishes policies and procedures for the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) implementation of the Substantially Underserved Trust Areas (SUTA) initiative under section 306F of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as amended (7 U.S.C. 906f). The purpose of this rule is to identify and improve the availability of eligible programs in communities in substantially underserved trust areas.
§ 15f.16 Although I request a hearing, may I request the ALJ to issue a decision without a hearing? ( a ) At any time after the parties have been notified of your hearing request, you may file a request with the ALJ to make a determination based on the written record. With your request, you should file any other arguments or evidence that you wish the ALJ to consider. The agency and OCR will have 35 days after you file your request to file any additional information, arguments, or evidence for the consideration of the ALJ. The ALJ may recommend dismissal of your complaint on the basis of a finding that it is not an eligible complaint; recommend denial of your eligible complaint on the merits; or make a proposed finding of discrimination on your eligible complaint and recommend to award you such relief as would be afforded under the applicable statute or regulation under which the eligible complaint was filed. The ALJ will make a proposed determination on your complaint based on the original complaint, the Section 741 Complaint Request, the OCR report, and any other evidence or written documents filed by the parties. The proposed determination will become the final determination 35 days after it is filed unless you request review of the proposed determination by the ASCR. The ASCR also may review the proposed determination on his or her own initiative. If the ASCR reviews the decision, he or she will allow the parties a reasonable opportunity to file briefs in support of or opposition to the proposed determination, and afterwards will issue a final determination within 35 days after you request review of the proposed determination.
( b ) To the maximum extent practicable, a final determination will be made within 180 days of your filing of the Section 741 Complaint Request.
[63 FR 67394, Dec. 4, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 27449, May 20, 2003]
Exhibit 32


SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





In connection with the quarterly report of Andain, Inc. (“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their knowledge:


1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: January 26, 2011

/s/ Sam Shlomo ElimelechSam Shlomo Elimelech, PresidentDated: January 26, 2011

/s/ Gai Mar-ChaimGai Mar-Chaim, Secretary/Treasurer

(principal financial officer)
#### Virginia Fletcher, Respondent, v Sherwood W. Greiner, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and fraud, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 24, 1979 which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Defendant’s failure to assert the proper subsection of the statute in his dismissal motion should have been disregarded (see CPLR 2001), in view of the lack of prejudice to plaintiff who was well acquainted with the basis of his motion through defendant’s memorandum of law and responded to it on the merits (see *Nye v Dawes,*20 AD2d 680). Plaintiffs first cause of action for breach of an oral employment contract alleged to extend until she reached age 65 must fall as being within the Statute of Frauds (see General Obligations Law, § 5-701). Her allegations of partial performance are insufficient to remove the agreement from the operation of the statute (see *Health Delivery Systems v Scheinman,*42 AD2d 566). Plaintiffs second cause of action must also be dismissed since promissory statements of actions to be performed in the future do not provide a basis for an action in fraud (see *Adams v Gillig,*199 NY 314). Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.2


Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers and Geologists





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 033-54084, 333-39299, 333-108162, 333-118976, 333-143203, 333-143204, 333-158922, 333-177825, 333-191878, 333-205728, 333-217605) on Form S-8 of Noble Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) of the reference to Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. and the inclusion of our report dated January 24, 2019 in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 , of the Company and its subsidiaries, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.











NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:/s/ Danny D. SimmonsDanny D. Simmons, P.E.President and Chief Operating OfficerHouston, TexasFebruary 19, 2019
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1412.42 Eligible producers. ( a ) Producers eligible to enter into a contract are: ( 1 ) An owner of a farm who has an ownership share of a crop and who assumes all or a part of the risk of producing a crop that is commensurate with that claimed ownership share of the crop; or
( 2 ) A producer, other than an owner, on a farm with a share-rent lease for such farm, regardless of the length of the lease, if the owner of the farm enters into the same contract; or
( 3 ) A producer, other than an owner, on a farm who cash rents such farm under a lease expiring on or after September 30 of the year of the contract in which case the owner is not required to enter into the contract; or
( 4 ) A producer, other than an owner, on a farm who cash rents such farm under a lease expiring before September 30 of the year of the contract. The owner of such farm must also enter into the same contract, failing which the farm is not enrolled; or
( 5 ) An owner of an eligible farm who cash rents such farm and the lease term expires before September 30 of the year of the contract, if the tenant declines to enter into a contract for the applicable year. In the case of an owner covered by this paragraph, payments will not begin under the contract until the lease held by the tenant ends.
( b ) A minor child will be eligible to enter into a contract only if one of the following conditions exist: ( 1 ) The right of majority has been conferred upon the minor by court proceedings or law;
( 2 ) A guardian has been appointed to manage the minor's property and the applicable program documents are executed by the guardian; or
( 3 ) A bond is furnished under which a surety guarantees any loss incurred for which the minor would be liable had the minor been an adult.
( c ) The owner of the farm may be considered the “producer” if there is no other producer, but the owner could have shared in the crop had a crop been produced, but only if the farm and owner otherwise meet all the requirements for payment.
[79 FR 57717, Sept. 26, 2014]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                       -----------------------------------


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT



                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 18, 2000


                       NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
      (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



New Jersey                   1-640                    13-5267260
----------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other       (Commission File No.)     (Employer ID No.)
jurisdiction of
incorporation)



16825 Northchase Dr., Suite 1200, Houston, Texas             77060
------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (281) 423-3300
                                                     --------------


                          Not Applicable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
  (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



<PAGE>


Item 5.  Other Events.
-------


         On October 18, 2000 , the Registrant  issued the press release attached
hereto  as  Exhibit  99.1  and  incorporated  herein  in its  entirety  by  this
reference.




Item 7.  Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.
-------


         (c)      Exhibits

                (i)      Exhibit 99.1.    Press Release dated October 18, 2000 .



                            *      *      *      *      *




                                                      SIGNATURE



         Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the  Registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                                     NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                                     (Registrant)


                                                     /s/Robert D. Hardy
                                                     ------------------
                                                     Robert D. Hardy
                                                     Vice President & Controller



Dated: October 20, 2000
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed July 21, 2021.

________________

No. 3D20-0669

Lower Tribunal No. 11-25407

________________

Alexander Robyn,

Appellant,

vs.

Corina E. Robyn,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marcia Del 

Rey, Judge.

Abramowitz and Associates, and Evan L. Abramowitz, for appellant.

Davis Smith & Jean, LLC, and Sonja A. Jean and Laura Davis Smith, 

for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. 

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.
2

The former wife properly concedes that the trial court erred in finding 

the former husband in willful contempt for failing to pay court ordered 

undifferentiated support in the amount of $188,000.00 where the contempt 

order does not contain a purge provision or a finding that the husband has 

the present ability to purge himself of the contempt. See Sosa v. Portilla, 

306 So. 3d 979, 980 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020); Douglas v. Douglas, 485 So. 2d 

18, 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Because we are reversing on this basis, we need 

not reach the former husband’s argument that the requirement that the 

$188,000 be paid from the entirety of his salary violates 15 U.S.C. § 1673(b)

but we remind the trial court that income deduction orders must comply with 

section 61.1301, Florida Statutes (2021). See Garcia v. Garcia, 560 So. 2d 

403, 404-05 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

Reversed and remanded.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: APPOINTMENT OF SENIOR JUDGE JOSEPH M. JAMES AS ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, WASHINGTON COUNTY : : : : : : : : : : No. 434 J udicial Administration Docket

**ORDER**

**PER CURIA M**  **AN D**  **NOW**, this 5th d ay of November, 2014, in accordance with the general supervisory powers vested in this Court by Article V, Section 10 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, the Honorable Joseph M. James of Allegheny County is hereby appointed
as Administrative Judge of the Court of Common P leas of Washington County until further order of this Court, effective immediately.