alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to main content 
An official website of the Department of Health & Human ServicesMore            BackSearch ahrq.gov-  Menu-  Search All AHRQ SitesCareersContact UsEspañolFAQs
                            Email UpdatesFont Size: Search MEPSSMLXL Search ResultsThe components in this navigation bar are fully operational with or without the use of JavaScript** MEPS Home**** About MEPS ****** **::** Survey Background **::** Workshops & Events **::** Data Release Schedule** Survey Components ****** **::** Household **::** Insurance/Employer **::** Medical Provider **::** Survey Questionnaires Data and Statistics ************ **::** Data Overview  **::** MEPS Topics  **::** Publications Search **::** MEPS Data Tools (HC/IC) **::** Data Files **::** Data        Centers** Communication****** **::** What's New  **::** Mailing List **::** Discussion Forum **::** Participants' Corner **Search Results**printer-friendly **Search Criteria****Publication type:** Research Findings, Highlights**Search again**Select a title to see the publication details; select a column heading to sort the list. Notes              on viewing and downloading filesPrinting              tips **Results: 65**Title****Pub. type & no.** **Year**Component**File type**Health Insurance Benefits at Private Employers: Pooled State-Level Estimates, 2021-2023Research Findings            512024Insurance ComponentPDF(3.3 MB)**********
#### § 1540.24 Determination of the Secretary of Agriculture.

If the Secretary of Agriculture has reason to believe that the perishable product(s) which is the subject of a petition under this subpart is being imported into the United States in such increased quantities as to be a substantial cause of serious injury, or the threat thereof, to the domestic industry producing a perishable product like or directly competitive with the imported perishable product and that emergency action is warranted, the Secretary, within 14 days after the filing of the petition under § 1540.23 shall recommend to the President that the President take emergency action. If the Secretary determines not to recommend the imposition of emergency action, the Secretary, within 14 days after the filing of the petition, will publish in the Federal Register a notice of such determination and will so advise the petitioner.
#### Winfield R. DuBreuil, Defendant in Error, v. Edward E. Klein, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 8,248.

Opinion filed January 24, 1929.

Murphy O. Tate, for plaintiff in error.

O’Hair & McClain, for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.

Winfield R. DuBreuil, defendant in error, commenced this suit in the circuit court of Edgar county. The declaration charges that the plaintiff in error, Edward E. Klein, negligently drove his automobile on the 14th day of October, 1923, on a public road in Edgar county; and that, by reason of such negligent driving, he collided with the automobile of the defendant in error; and that he thereby caused injuries to the automobile of the defendant in error; also personal injuries. To this declaration the plaintiff in error filed two pleas: the plea of not guilty; and the further plea alleging that he was not the owner of the automobile referred to in the declaration, and did not operate nor control the same at the time of the injury complained of. Thereafter there was a jury trial at the November *92term, 1924, and the jury returned a verdict of not guilty. The defendant in error thereupon moved the court for a new trial and the motion was granted and a new trial ordered. Thereafter, at the February term, 1925, there was another jury trial, but the jury were unable to agree upon a verdict and were discharged and the cause was continued. At the November term, 1926, the cause was again called for trial, and the plaintiff in error failing to appear, the case was submitted to a jury as in case of default, merely to assess damages; but was not submitted to the jury upon the main issues, namely, whether the plaintiff in error was guilty of the negligence charged in the declaration. The jury returned a verdict assessing the damages at $1,013, and the court rendered judgment for that amount against the plaintiff in error, together with costs of the suit. This writ of error is prosecuted from the judgment.

It is well settled that where the defendant in a case of this kind has filed a plea or pleas which raise issues that involve the question of the plaintiff in error’s guilt of the negligence charged in the declaration, these issues must be determined by the jury adversely to the defendant before damages can be assessed against him, whether the defendant in the suit be present or absent at the trial. *Manlove v. Bruner,*2 Ill. (1 Scam.) 390; *Covell v. Marks, 2*Ill. (1 Scam.) 391; *Mason v. Abbott,*83 Ill. 445; *Flora v. Fields,*156 Ill. App. 341; *Wacker v. Young,*173 Ill. App. 255; *Stare v. Vayda,*234 Ill. App. 309. It is apparent therefore that the judgment rendered in this case is erroneous. The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.

*jReversed and remanded.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Community Financial Shares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott W. Hamer, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Scott W. Hamer, CEO                              
|Scott W. Hamer Chief Executive
Officer March 31, 2011



|* | This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise
subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of Specialized Services, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David E. Joseph, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David E. Joseph

David E. JosephChief Executive OfficerDated: October 29, 2007

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Specialized Services, Inc. and willbe retained by Specialized Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
C. A. No. 78-43.

#### State *v.*Robert A. Angell.

Mr. Justice Weisberger did not participate.

*Dennis J. Roberts II,*Attorney General, *Faith A. LaSalle,*Special Assistant Attorney General, for plaintiff. *Barbara Hurst,*for defendant.

The petition for reargument is denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.35

CIBC
                                                 Ron D. Craven
                                                 Commercial Lending Specialist
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Winnipeg Commercial Banking
                                                 Centre
                                                 500-One Lombard Place
                                                 Winnipeg, MB
                                                 R3C 2P3
June 26, 2000

Mr. D. B. Kunau
Assistant Treasurer
Ceridian Corporation
3311 East Old Shakopee Road
Minneapolis, MN
55425-1640

Dear Mr. Kunau:

                      AMENDMENT NUMBER 2
                      CERIDIAN CANADA LTD.
                      CREDIT AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 1, 1998
                      ------------------------------------


We refer to the above agreement and our discussions concerning a review of the
credit limits including Facility B which is subject to annual review as per
Section 5.2(b). Based on our discussions we confirm the following changes:

         -  The credit limit for Facility A has been permanently reduced to
            $35,000,000.
         -  Facility C established to make available Corporate Visa Expense
            Accounts to a maximum of $1,000,000 is cancelled.
         -  The next annual review date as specified in Section 5.1(b) is
            May 31, 2001.

         Standby Fees-
         -  The standby fee recorded in Section 4.5 for Facility A effective
            June 1, 2000 will be calculated on the reduced authorized limit.

The credit limit has been reduced as per your specific request. Facility C has
been cancelled as you advised this facility is no longer required. We are
proposing to extend the annual review date by one month to allow additional time
to receive and review the annual statement.

Please acknowledge receipt of these amendments on the enclosed copy of this
letter. The next annual review is scheduled for April 30, 2001.

Yours truly,


/s/R.D. Craven
Commercial Lending Specialist
                                              1 of 2
                                              ----------------
                                              Tel:  204-944-5033
                                              Fax:  204-943-8347
<PAGE>   2


         Acknowledgment:   The undersigned acknowledges receipt of a copy
                           of this Agreement.

                           Accepted this 5th day of July, 2000.

         CERIDIAN CANADA LTD.

               By:     /s/John H. Grierson   By:     /s/James R. Burkle

               Name:   John H. Grierson      Name:   James R. Burkle

               Title:  Vice President        Title:  Vice President
                       & Treasurer
#### Ruth Stoner *v.*Melvin Stoner

*Paul W. Orth,*in support of the motion.

*John Crosskey,*in opposition.

Submitted June 1

decided October 27, 1971

The motion by the defendant for a review of the order of the Superior Court in Hartford County terminating the stay of execution is granted; the request for a hearing and for an order vacating the termination of the stay is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1678 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1678

    To amend title 46, United States Code, to reinstate provisions 
    requiring that a percentage of aid provided by the Secretary of 
Agriculture or the Commodity Credit Corporation in the form of certain 
   agricultural commodities or their products must be transported on 
    commercial vessels of the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2013

 Mr. Cummings (for himself, Mr. Rigell, Mr. Rahall, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. 
Larsen of Washington, Ms. Pingree of Maine, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Pocan, Mr. 
 Grimm, and Mr. Young of Alaska) introduced the following bill; which 
was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the 
  Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 46, United States Code, to reinstate provisions 
    requiring that a percentage of aid provided by the Secretary of 
Agriculture or the Commodity Credit Corporation in the form of certain 
   agricultural commodities or their products must be transported on 
    commercial vessels of the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saving Essential American Sailors 
Act'' or the ``SEAS Act''.

SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF REQUIREMENT TO TRANSPORT AGRICULTURAL-
              COMMODITY AID ON COMMERCIAL VESSELS OF THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 100124 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century 
Act (Public Law 112-141) is repealed, and the provisions of law that 
were repealed or amended by that section are revived and amended, 
respectively, to read as if such section were not enacted.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed November 5, 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00842

- CR

SAHISHNU SHANMUGAM , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 005

- 83471

- 2012



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Lang, and Brown Opinion by Justice Brown Sahishnu Shanmugam was convicted of driving while intoxicated, sec ond offense.

Punishment was assessed at 300 days’ confinement in jail, probated for eighteen months, and an

$800 fine. When the clerk’s and reporter’s records were not filed, we ordered the trial court to
conduct a hearing on the status of the records. We adopted the findings that appellant, who filed
a pro se notice of appeal, did not appear for the hearing, is not indigent, and has not paid for the
record. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b)

(clerk’s record not filed due to appellant’s fault)

.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47

130842F.U05 /Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

SAHISHNU SHANMUGAM, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00842

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 005

- 83471

- 2012. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Justices Moseley and Lang participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this dat e, we DISMISS the appeal for want of prosecution.

Judgment entered this 5 th day of November, 2013.

/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69090-69091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism; Initial Review Group; Biomedical Research Review 
Subcommittee.
    Date: March 15-16, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.

[[Page 69091]]

    Contact Person: Philippe Marmillot, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 2019, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-443-2861, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#771a16051a1e1b1b180307371a161e1b59191e1f59101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e38e82918e8a8f8f8c9793a38e828a8fcd8d8a8bcd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 3, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-28376 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Teen Dating Violence      

# Teen Dating Violence

This site provides information about teen dating violence

https://www.justice.gov/ovw/dating-violence
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** **aa?*****m rugprr**  **so OouMZa**  **oAadi6nt.8.** 

### forany oounty 

### or preolnet 

### oftiw, tttaero 

### 8 rJorlty **vets** 

### 18 **retwired to**  **oaka aalnhioa~**  **bat at**  

### 8uChl 

### ooond?rlmOr~,

~&+%@a twe 

### 0Onadatw w h ot ror l rrb

t he ~b l & b a t

**nurabor**OS **voter** lt. 

### tho a8nOr01

prhu 

### I.

for tha #ama



### orfloor r&ml1 bra tholr

a8848 

### p od O>OII thr 

### ofilrlrl

&allot,

. . .* 

### In rlow or 

### Artlola sits 4d **Article** 

### 8106, **rwrn,** 

### it 1s qataroat Chatt&eowmty 

### rroeutl** oemaltt44 48n doelda whothor

the 

### asmlmtloa

o? eouaty

endprooiaaet ofrleur rim11 Qo by ujmlty or pbualfty **‘ IWoe**  

### (Pior tho folJ.oti~% 444a1: Cllott 

### v. I~lllarr8,

99 8, 6, (SM)

&to; **An6ouoa** 

### v. AldrlQh, UC 8. W, (fd)6081Dunaaav. 

### uu 'I. Yatar, 119 z. R'.

f **2d)** 

### Jeml, t4 8. 5. (Cd)8191w8gMa) err.1 **197bl**Snttln **v. Bud~oa,**  **148 23.**  **K.**

**"It** 

### fr 4148r thst 

### whstr tli6 8rmoutiro OOPtitter, l 

### t theprogrr tImo 804prior

to thr rlrrt 

### primary,,

prorld4s

for tbraoaiaotlcm

of **count** mu pree?n0t lffloua by EaJotitr rote (Attl0 i0 

### SUM, R. A., 192b) no j?arMn 

### 484 br bos]Jro6 to bo Oha n4Bb88 

### of hlr m-9 for 8 **4OU0tt OF**  gU4ilMt Offi44, W&1088 tht pUMtA ??rC8iT48 8 **rJorltr OS'**  

### the tote8 

### la rha fir5t grlw?." After oer*iuUy 6oatidOTti6 

### A?tiOh 31.06, 8U@f@,

and 

### the lBWI **Rsatianrd** 

### O&Sal, **it** 

### 18 **OUt** 

### @pi*108**t&t tke**  **@OPntr** rreoutlv8 eoluitt00 18 not suthorimr4 

### to pro*140 

### rm thrnoa. in8thn o f l ODO c o unt y n a 4 p r u l m t o ill o U@ in l 

### OOUDt9 by rJorlty **tot0** 8oa rurtaer 

### providrs r0rtb n0m:a8tlon of. other 

### county 8nd 

### proalmt orrloars of 88i6 c o unt y. 

### by l 

### plrr8lltr rota I I n l

AH? to lour pubrtion, a6 rt8td above, it ia At?~ opinion thnt thr 

### eolpty euoutlrr **oommlttor must**  

### dosldo and 68tU8iAC 

### whotim Or 5Ot 

### t&e AQbDtfOn O fl

### &l **OOMtf** 

### Md &WO**OtnOt** Offl8~8 

### ehul @o by l **rJorUy** or a plUralit VOter

. :

### 4

. ’

Itoaarablr C. t. **httorooa,** P8gr s



### rU1 **bo no**  **neor8rity** 

### torl l r o md primry, l



### xorpt lo ths 

### pmolnot matload, 

### whloh bm8d&t caadldator 

### tor a praclnot ottiao, although

tha oounty oroeatlve aodttor 

### gmnlda **that** 

### norrlmtlon **for** 

### all eountr asd praclnet 

### OcfiO8r8 #hall br by 

### 8 rrrtorlty rok; k1410~4?, 

### lo oonosotlaa wltt #e torogolta& andwith rrt.raaW 

### to a 844Oad $s r i M r y l 184tiOO for 8-b 

### 0fri0Or8,

4t0.. wo dirOot

YOU 4ttO5tioa

to SUIopiD50a

HO. 04440, sbd ~01oro a copy or the #ame.



### Ardoll sllliamr Asrlrtaat
917.7200 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart discusses the policy for the use of a program opportunity notice solicitation approach to accelerate the demonstration of the technical feasibility and commercial application of all potentially beneficial nonnuclear energy sources and utilization technologies.
( b ) This subpart applies to demonstrations performed by individuals, educational institutions, commercial or industrial organizations, or other private entities, public entities, including State and local governments, but not other Federal agencies. For purposes of this subpart, commercial demonstration projects include demonstrations of technological advances, field demonstrations of new methods and procedures, and demonstration of prototype commercial applications for the exploration, development, production, transportation, conversion, and utilization of non-nuclear energy resources.
[61 FR 41706, Aug. 9, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 36365, July 22, 2009; 76 FR 7693, Feb. 11, 2011]