alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Report of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors
Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the
accompanying "Report of Management on Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.'s
Internal Control Over the Preparation of Monthly Servicer's Certificates
Relative to the Servicing of Automobile Loan Receivables," that Chevy
Chase Bank, F.S.B. maintained effective internal control over the
preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing of
automobile loan receivables owned by Chevy Chase Auto Receivables
Trusts Series 2000-1, 2000-2, 2001-1, 2001-2 and
2001-3 (collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein) as of September
30, 2002, based on criteria established in "Internal Control-Integrated
Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.'s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over the preparation
of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing of automobile
loan receivables owned by the Trusts. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of the internal control
over the preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the
servicing of automobile loan receivables owned by the Trusts, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of the internal control,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatements due
to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projections of any
evaluation of the internal control over the preparation of monthly
Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing of automobile loan
receivables owned by the Trusts to future periods are subject to the risk
that the internal control may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.
maintained effective internal control over the preparation of monthly
Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing of automobile loan
receivables owned by the Trusts as of September 30, 2002 is fairly stated,
in all material respects, based on criteria established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of Chevy Chase
Bank, F.S.B. and U.S. Bank National Association, Wilmington Trust
Company, Fitch IBCA, Moody's Investment Services and Standard &
Poor's, and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other
than these specified parties.




October 23, 2002                    Ernst & Young LLP
M. P. No. 79-503.

#### The Marteg Corporation *et al. v.*The Zoning Board of the City of Warwick *et al.*

Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.

*Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury b Parsons, Paul V. Curdo,*for plaintiffs-respondents, *Revens b DeLuca, Sandra A. Rlanding,*for defendants-petitioners.

The petition for writ of certiorari and motion for stay are denied.
#### COSTET v. JEANTET et al. (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Actions by Gas-ton Costet against Edward J. Jeantet and others.

No opinion. Motions granted, with $10 costs in each case. Orders filed,
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Georgia International Mining Corp.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:

            (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:   May 25, 2007                                                    By: /s/ Mark Hague                                                                                                                                        Mark Hague, Chief Executive Officer (Principal			                                                                                             Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer, Chief			                                                                                             Accounting Officer and Principal Financial			                                                                                             Officer)

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

January 25, 2013

t0122

Order 

January 25, 2013

145900

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145900

COA: 309517 

Macomb CC: 2010-003056-FH

JOHN JOSEPH ORLANDO,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of Specialized Services, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the “Report”), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David E. Joseph, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ David E. Joseph

David E. JosephChief Executive OfficerDated: October 17, 2007

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Specialized Services, Inc. and willbe retained by Specialized Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1463.9 Payment of assessments. ( a ) Assessments under this subpart are imposed for the expenditures CCC has determined it will incur in the 2005 through 2014 calendar years. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, payment of such assessments are due to CCC no later than the end of each calendar year quarter. If prior to 30 calendar days before the end of a calendar year quarter CCC has not notified an entity of the amount that is required to be remitted in that quarter, no interest will be assessed by CCC under paragraph (d) of this section until 30 calendar days have elapsed from the date CCC provided notification of the amount owed.
( b ) Payments due under this subpart must be submitted to CCC by electronic fund transfer unless prior written approval has been obtained from CCC.
( c ) The final two calendar year quarterly payments due to CCC under this part shall be due to CCC on September 30, 2014.
( d ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, if CCC has not received payment of assessments determined to be owed at the end of a calendar year quarter, CCC will assess interest on such unpaid amount beginning on the first day of the calendar year quarter immediately following the end of such prior quarter. Such interest will be at the rate CCC assesses on delinquent debts in accordance with part 1403 of this title.
( e ) With respect to funds placed in escrow that are refunded to the domestic manufacturer or importer of tobacco products due to the resolution of an appeal, interest will be paid on such amount from the date of receipt by CCC until the date of the refund. Such interest rate will be at the rate charged by the U.S. Treasury for CCC's borrowing that is in effect on the date of receipt by CCC of such funds.
# Fourth Co **urt of Appeals**

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 31, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00300

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.J.M. AND H.J.M., Children,

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29724

Honorable Sergio J. Gonzalez, Judge P residing



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief is GRANTED. The

appellant ’ s reply brief is due on January 29, 2015.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the sea l of the said

court on this 31st day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Randy Buchamer, certify that:

2.            I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Bradner Ventures Ltd.;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.             The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.             The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  June 26, 2007

/s/ Randy Buchamer

Randy Buchamer 

Chief Financial Officer 

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

CW1277059.1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Shuttle Flight Support Motor no. 1 (FSM-1)Space Shuttle Flight Support Motor No. 1 (FSM-1) was static test fired on 15 Aug. 1990 at the Thiokol Corporation Static Test Bay T-24. FSM-1 was a full-scale, full-duration static test fire of a redesigned solid rocket motor. FSM-1 was the first of seven flight support motors which will be static test fired. The Flight Support Motor program validates components, materials, and manufacturing processes. In addition, FSM-1 was the full-scale motor for qualification of Western Electrochemical Corporation ammonium perchlorate. This motor was subjected to all controls and documentation requirements CTP-0171, Revision A. Inspection and instrumentation data indicate that the FSM-1 static test firing was successful. The ambient temperature during the test was 87 F and the propellant mean bulk temperature was 82 F. Ballistics performance values were within the specified requirements. The overall performance of the FSM-1 components and test equipment was nominal.Document ID19910006751Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsHughes, Phil D.*(Thiokol Corp. Brigham City, UT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 13, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberPUBL-910801TWR-50068NAS 1.26:184078NASA-CR-184078Accession Number91N16064Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-30490Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006751.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Marcia Pucinski et al. *v.*Richard R. DiMauro et al.

*John F. Walsh,*in support of the motion.

Submitted August 3

decided August 13, 1971

The plaintiffs’ “Motion To Order A Decision Sustaining A Demurrer” is granted. See Practice Book § 114. The Superior Court in Hartford County is directed to extend the time in which the parties may plead after the memorandum of decision on the demurrer has been filed.
**[Fortress      International Group, Inc. Letterhead]**

**AMENDMENT      NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

| 1. | Section                3.1 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3.1 | **Base                Salary**.                During the Employment Period, the Company shall pay the Executive                a base                salary of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) per year (“Base                Salary”) paid in approximately equal installments bi-weekly. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Section                4.1 is hereby deleted in its entirety and the monthly payment for                office                allowance shall cease. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Yours                Sincerely,                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | Fortress                International Group, Inc.                                                                                                                                        |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | By:                /s/ Timothy C.                Dec                       |
|   | Name:                 Timothy Dec                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | Title:                   Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                          |

----
#### Steve Bolleck, appellee, v. Samuel Vig, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,458.

Opinion filed November 6, 1929.

Rehearing denied November 22, 1929.

Ringer, Wilhartz & Hirsch and Joseph D. Irose, for appellant; Ben A. Stewart, of counsel. Eugene V. .Taylor, for appellee; Charles H. Pease, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Wilson

delivered the opinion of the court.
@ EarthTech

ATyeo International Ltd. Company

March 15, 2006

Mr. Joe Slattery

Project Manager

Attn: CENWO-PM-HC (Slattery)

106 South 15th Street

Omaha, Nebraska 68102-1618

3033 Campus Drive

Suite 290

Minneapolis, MN 55441

p 763.551.1001

f 763.551.2499

www.earthtech.com

Subject: Contract DACW45-94-D-001, 00-48

Report Disposition - Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection for Ash at

Gateway Lake Area

Serial Letter 1-48-RD-313

Dear Mr. Slattery:

This serial letter is provided to document the status and current disposition of a draft Preliminary

Assessment/Site Inspection (PAlSI) Report, dated August 2003, that was previously submitted

by Earth Tech, Inc. (Earth Tech), on August 15, 2003 (via Serial Letter 1-48-RD-311).

The draft PAISI Report, dated August 2003, concluded that no further action is required at this

site based on low risk posed by the waste (ash/debris) buried onsite if it were to remain in place.

The report was reviewed by the RPM group and comments were provided to Earth Tech.

However, after discussing the issue at a meeting in September 2005, it was agreed by the RPM

group that responses to comments, further revisions and finalization of the PAISI would not be

necessary, because Ellsworth AFB decided instead to proceed with a voluntary action to

excavate and dispose of the ash/debris. The understanding is that this voluntary action will

eliminate the need to continue the investigation process started by the draft PAISI.

Consequently, directions were changed and a work plan is now being prepared to conduct the

voluntary excavation and disposal. An implementation report will be prepared afterwards to

document the final disposition of the site and the ash/debris.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (763) 551-2440.

(J~ereIY,

~.~ Project Manager

cc: Dell Petersen

John DeYoe

Tim Pavek

Dwight Pochant

Mark Mailander

Jeff Mashburn

Joane Uneberg

Bob Todd

Mark Mercier

Deb Morrissey

4380 00001
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of M.L. Macadamia Orchards, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersignedmanagement of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that,

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 
| /s/ Wayne W. Roumagoux  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| Wayne W. Roumagoux      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 27, 2009     |   |

 

----
§ 15b.23 Educational setting. ( a ) *Academic setting.* A recipient to which this subpart applies shall educate, or shall provide for the education of each qualified handicapped person in its jurisdiction with persons who are not handicapped to the maximum extent appropriate to the needs of the handicapped person. A recipient shall place a handicapped person in the regular educational environment operated by the recipient unless it is demonstrated by the recipient that the education of the person in the regular environment with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily. Whenever a recipient places a person in a setting other than the regular educational environment pursuant to this paragraph, it shall take into account the proximity of the alternate setting to the person's home.
( b ) *Nonacademic setting.* In providing or arranging for the provision of nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities, including meals, recess periods, and the services and activities set forth in § 15b.26(a)(2), a recipient shall ensure that handicapped persons participate with nonhandicapped persons in such activities and services to the maximum extent appropriate to the needs of the handicapped person in question.
( c ) *Comparable facilities.* If a recipient, in compliance with paragraph (a) of this section, operates a facility that is identifiable as being for handicapped persons, the recipient shall ensure that the facility and the services and activities provided therein are comparable to the other facilities, services, and activities of the recipient.