alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF FRANK AIELLO


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

     In connection with the Periodic Report of Cal Alta Auto Glass, Inc.,(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frank Aiello, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 10, 2005        By: /s/ Frank Aiello
                                                       -------------------
                                                        Frank Aiello
                                                        President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,325
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,015
<PP&E>                                          73,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,984
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,503
<SALES>                                         15,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,950
<CGS>                                           10,192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,177
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,847
<INCOME-TAX>                                       202
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,645
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,645
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00826

- CR

Taylor M. MOSER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 4960

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

REVERSED and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court for a new trial.

SIGNED April 29, 2015.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JESSE MCGRATH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 401 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 175 

To require labor organizations to provide the notice to employees related 

to fees collection required pursuant to the Supreme Court cases Teachers 

Local No. 1 v. Hudson and Knox v. Service Employees International 

Union. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To require labor organizations to provide the notice to employees related to fees collection required pursuant to 

the Supreme Court cases Teachers Local No. 1 v. Hudson and Knox v. Service Employees International Union. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Paycheck 

5 Protection Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 175 IH

1 SEC. 2. NOTICE REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO FEES COL2 LECTION BY LABOR ORGANIZATIONS. 

3 (a) NOTICE REQUIRED.—Prior to imposing or col4 lecting any dues or fees from its members or from any 

5 other employees covered by a collective bargaining agree6 ment, or increasing any such dues or fees, a labor organi7 zation shall provide all employees covered by the collective 

8 bargaining agreement with a written notice explaining how 

9 the labor organization calculated the share of such dues 

10 or fees that are for non-political costs related to collective 

11 bargaining. 

12 (b) AFFIRMATIVE CONSENT REQUIRED FROM NON13 UNION EMPLOYEES.—A labor organization may not exact 

14 any funds for dues or fees from any employee covered by 

15 a collective bargaining agreement who is not a member 

16 of the labor organization without the affirmative consent 

17 of such employee. 

18 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

19 As used in this Act, the terms ‘‘employee’’ and ‘‘labor 

20 organization’’ have the meanings given such terms in sec21 tion 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 

22 152). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1615 

To provide for a study by the Institute of Medicine on gaps in mental 

health services and how these gaps can increase the risk of violent acts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2013 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself and Ms. KAPTUR) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a study by the Institute of Medicine on 

gaps in mental health services and how these gaps can 

increase the risk of violent acts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Examining America’s 

5 Mental Health Services Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY ON GAPS IN MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Health and Human 

8 Services (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) 

9 shall enter into an agreement with the Institute of Medi10 cine (or, if the Institute declines to enter into such an arVerDate Mar 15 2010 20:40 Apr 19, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1615.IH H1615

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1615 IH

1 rangement, another appropriate entity) to conduct a com2 prehensive study on— 

3 (1) gaps in mental health services, including 

4 treatment services, whether publicly or privately 

5 funded; and 

6 (2) how these gaps can increase the risk of vio7 lent acts. 

8 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—The study under subsection 

9 (a) shall include consideration of— 

10 (1) gaps in mental health treatment services for 

11 adults and children with severe and persistent men12 tal illness; 

13 (2) barriers to receiving mental health services 

14 that result in high rates of untreated mental illness; 

15 and 

16 (3) the availability of interventions such as as17 sisted outpatient treatment designed to reach indi18 viduals with untreated severe mental illness. 

19 (c) REPORT.—The Secretary shall ensure that, not 

20 later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this 

21 Act— 

22 (1) the study under subsection (a) is completed; 

23 and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1615 IH

1 (2) a report on the findings and conclusions of 

2 such study is submitted to the Congress. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 33306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14076]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

[CMS-5501-CN]

Medicare Program; Pioneer Accountable Care Organization Model, 
Request for Applications; Correction

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects technical errors that appeared in the 
notice published in the May 20, 2011 Federal Register entitled 
``Medicare Program; Pioneer Accountable Care Organization Model: 
Request for Applications.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Alexander, (410) 786-4792.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    In FR Doc. 2011-12383 of May 20, 2011 (76 FR 29249), there was a 
technical error that has been identified and corrected in the section 
III. of this notice (Correction of Errors section).

II. Summary of Errors

    On page 29250 of the notice in the DATES section, we inadvertently 
requested that the Office of the Federal Register base the application 
submission deadline on the 60th day after publication of the notice 
(that is, July 19, 2011) instead of postmarked on or before July 18, 
2011 which was noted in the information posted on our Center for 
Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) Web site and in the Pioneer ACO 
Application. (For more information see http://innovations.cms.gov/areas-of-focus/seamless-and-coordinated-care-models/pioneer-aco/.) 
Therefore, in section III. of this correction notice, we correct this 
error by inserting the date of the application submission deadline that 
coincides with the application submission deadline announced in the 
Request for Application posted on the CMMI Web site, which is 
postmarked on or before July 18, 2011.

III. Correction of Errors

    In FR Doc. 2011-12383 of May 20, 2011 (76 FR 29249), make the 
following correction:
    1. On page 29250, in the DATES section, lines 10 and 11, the 
sentence ``Applications must be received on or before July 19, 2011.'' 
is corrected to read ``Applications must be postmarked on or before 
July 18, 2011.''

    Authority:  Section 1115A of the Social Security Act.

    Dated: June 2, 2011.
Jacquelyn Y. White,
Director, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs Centers 
for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2011-14076 Filed 6-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
```
§ 1700.107 Considerations relevant to the exercise of SUTA discretionary provisions. ( a ) In considering requests to make available financing with an interest rate as low as 2 percent, and extended repayment terms, the Administrator will evaluate the effect of and need for such terms on the finding of financial feasibility.
( b ) In considering a request for a non-duplication waiver, the Administrator will consider the offerings of all existing service providers to determine whether or not granting the non-duplication waiver is warranted. A waiver of non-duplication restrictions will not be given if the Administrator determines as a matter of financial feasibility that, taking into account all existing service providers, an applicant or RUS borrower would not be able to repay a loan or successfully implement a grant agreement. Requests for waivers of non-duplication restrictions will be reviewed by taking the following factors into consideration: ( 1 ) The size, extent and demographics of the duplicative area;
( 2 ) The cost of service from existing service providers;
( 3 ) The quality of available service; and
( 4 ) The ability of the existing service provider to serve the eligible service area.
( c ) Requests for waivers of matching fund requirements will be evaluated by taking the following factors into consideration: ( 1 ) Whether waivers or reductions in matching or equity requirements would make an otherwise financially infeasible project financially feasible;
( 2 ) Whether permitting a matching requirement to be met with sources not otherwise permitted in an affected program due to regulatory prohibition may be allowed under a separate statutory authority; and
( 3 ) Whether the application could be ranked and scored as if the matching requirements were fully met.
( d ) Requests for waivers of credit support requirements will be evaluated taking the following factors into consideration: ( 1 ) The cost and availability of credit support relative to the loan security derived from such support;
( 2 ) The extent to which the requirement is shown to be a barrier to the applicant's participation in the program; and
( 3 ) The alternatives to waiving the requirements.
( e ) The Administrator may adapt the manner of assigning highest funding priority to align with the selection methods used for particular programs or funding opportunities. ( 1 ) Eligible programs which use priority point scoring may, in a notice of funds availability or similar notice, assign extra points for SUTA eligible applicants as a means to exercise a discretionary authority under this subpart.
( 2 ) The Administrator may announce a competitive grant opportunity focused exclusively or primarily on trust lands which incorporates one or more discretionary authorities under this subpart into the rules or scoring for the competition.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kevin M. Shook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Kevin M. Shook                   
|                       |  |  |  | Kevin M. Shook                       
|                       |  |  |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Advancing the Use of Core Components Approaches: Suggestions for Researchers Publishing Evaluation 

Results

Resources

• Advancing the Use of Core Components of Effective Programs: Suggestions for Researchers 

Publishing Evaluation Results - https://youth.gov/sites/default/files/ASPE-Brief_CoreComponents.pdf 

• Advancing the Use of Core Components of Effective Programs - https://forumfyi.org/knowledgecenter/advancing-core-components/ 

• Link to register for Exploring Core Components Research in Social Services Settings on October 28 

and 29 from 1:00-5:00pm ET - https://opremethodsmeeting.org/meetings/2020 

• BCT Taxonomy - https://www.bct-taxonomy.com/

• Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) 

checklist and guide - https://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g1687

• Spirit Checklist: Participant Timeline - https://www.spirit-statement.org/participant-timeline/

• CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological 

intervention trials - https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-018-2735-z

• The Oxford Implementation Index: A new tool for incorporating implementation data into 

systematic reviews and meta-analyses - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3746185/

• The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidencebased interventions - https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-

019-0898-y

• Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting -

https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-8-139

• Science as behaviour: Using a behaviour change approach to increase uptake of open science - 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08870446.2019.1679373

• Development of a CONSORT extension for social and psychological interventions -

https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:c1bd46df-eb3f-4dc6-9cc1-38c26a5661a9

• Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) -

https://societyforimplementationresearchcollaboration.org
#### § 170.2 Is the USDA Farmers Market a producer-only market?

Yes. A producer-only market is one that does not offer agricultural products that are commercially made, created, or produced, and only allows agricultural products that are grown by a principal farmer. A producer-only market offers raw agricultural products such as fruits, vegetables, flowers, bedding plants, and potted plants. The USDA Farmers Market is a producer-only market since only farmers who may sell products that they grow or produce will be selected for participation. It also allows the sale of value-added products and other specialized non-produce items.
Sarah Bagley: Addiction is a highly stigmatized disease and we even find that some of the 

treatments that we use for addiction are also stigmatized. Some of the stigmas 

associated with having an addiction and a general perception in the public, that 

addiction is the result of a lack of will power, poor choices, or just bad habits 

that people have. We often find too, that there's stigma associated with the 

medications we use to treat an opioid use disorder. So we hear in the 

community some times that we're just substituting one drug for another. One 

really easy way that we can all try to reduce the stigma associated with 

addiction is to change the language that we use. So for example, using person 

first language, so not trying to get rid of terms like addict or alcoholic or terms 

like abuse and instead say person with a substance use disorder, or person with 

an alcohol use disorder, or someone who is misusing substances. 

Another way that we can reduce the stigma associated with addiction is to use 

medically accurate terminology. We know that addiction is a brain disease. It's a 

chronic illness and so we should use terms like we do when talking about 

asthma, or COPD or diabetes or other chronic medical illnesses when talking 

about patients who have addiction. For a really long time, people who had 

substance abuse or alcohol use disorders were viewed as being weak, that they 

had a habit that they couldn't get rid of and that they just needed to have the 

willpower in order to overcome what was going on and change there lives. Over 

the last couple of decades we have had definitive research showing that in fact, 

addiction is a brain disease. It's a chronic relapsing disease and that people need 

more than just will power in order to recover from the alcohol or substance use 

disorder. In our program we handle this a couple of ways. 

One is just being really upfront with our patients and telling them that we 

recognize that this is a stigmatizing disease and we recognize that there might 

have been a lot of places in there lives that they've been where they've felt 

judged. Just by showing them that we understand that, patients often will 

literally just relax in our offices and we can see that they feel like they're in a 

safe place. We know both through research and from talking to patients that 

because of the stigma associated with addiction, people are less likely to seek 

treatment or ask for help. That's because they are worried about being judged 

or they maybe have family members who are concerned about what it's gonna 

mean if they find themselves in treatment for an alcohol or substance abuse 

disorder. 

If you have any questions about what the right terms are to use, or what stigma 

might mean when we're talking about stigma associated with addiction. Feel 

free to ask people who are experts, or people who maybe have a substance 

abuse disorder would be happy to talk to you about that. The humility that 

show by asking expresses the empathy that you have for patients who have 

substance use disorder.
-90 -88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

32 34 36 38 40 42 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/08 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL