alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



NRG South Central Generating LLC
Subsidiary List

Exhibit 21

|                              |  |                       |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | 
|Entity                        |  | State of Organization | 
|                              |  |                       | 
|NRG Sterlington Power LLC     |  | Delaware             
|                              |  |                       | 
|Big Cajun I Peaking Power LLC |  | Delaware             
|                              |  |                       | 
|NRG New Roads Holdings LLC    |  | Delaware             
|                              |  |                       | 
|Louisiana Generating LLC      |  | Delaware             
|                              |  |                       | 
|NRG Sabine River Works GP LLC |  | Delaware             
|                              |  |                       | 
|NRG Sabine River Works GP LLC |  | Delaware             
|                              |  |                       | 
|NRG Bayou Cove LLC            |  | Delaware             
|                              |  |                       | 
|Bayou Cove Peaking Power LLC  |  | Delaware             
|                              |  |                       | 
|Big Cajun II Unit 4 LLC       |  | Delaware             
|                              |  |                       | 
|                              |  |                      
|                              |  |                       |
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6431-6432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2843]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending January 9, 2010.

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0001.
    Date Filed: January 4, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: January 25, 2010.
    Description: Application of Craig Air Center, Inc. requesting 
authority to

[[Page 6432]]

operate scheduled passenger service as a commuter air carrier (``the 
Statute'').

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations Alternate Federal 
Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-2843 Filed 2-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
#### In the Matter of Leonard Zimet et al., Doing Business as Paretti’s Wine *&*Liquor Store, Petitioners, v. New York State Liquor Authority et al., Respondents.

'Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review and annul a determination of respondent State Liquor Authority approving an application by respondent Mazur for a retail liquor store license (transferred to this court for disposition [CPLR 7804, subd. (g)]). Proceeding held in abeyance and matter remitted to respondent State Liquor Authority for further proceedings consistent herewith and with the determination of the Court of Appeals in *Matter of Forman*v. *New York State Liq. Auth.*(17 N Y 2d 224). We are of the opinion that, as in *Forman,*the record fails to disclose how public convenience and advantage will be promoted by the issuance of a retail liquor store license to respondent Mazur for premises within 50 feet of petitioners’ licensed premises. There should be a new hearing at which petitioners, in the interests of fairness and to aid in the development of a complete record, should *559be afforded an opportunity to present proof on the question of whether the issuance of the additional license would promote public convenience and advantage. Within 30 days following such hearing and the completion of such further investigation and proceedings as the Authority may deem necessary, the Authority shall serve and file a transcript of the record of all such proceedings and of the Authority’s determination. Within 20 days after such filing, petitioners shall serve and file a supplemental brief; and within 15 days thereafter respondents shall serve and file supplemental briefs. Thereupon, the Clerk of this court will place the matter on the calendar for argument at the next succeeding term. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ottawa Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Gary L. OcepekGary L. OcepekPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2006/s/ Jon L. KranovJon L. KranovSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 12, 2006




19
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Midnight Candle Company (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Helen C. Cary, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Patrick Deparini, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Helen C. Cary

     Helen C. Cary

     Chief Executive Officer 

     June 26, 2008

 

/s/Patrick Deparini

    Patrick Deparini

    Chief Financial Officer

    June 26, 2008
#### §§ 1709.204-1709.206 [Reserved]
exhibit_10-1.htm

















Exhibit 10.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


 


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-54356, 333-117849, 333-136633, 333-158983, 333-164064 and 333-173480) pertaining to the 2003 Share Option Plan of Ceragon Networks Ltd. (“Ceragon”) of our reports dated April 3, 2013, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Ceragon and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Ceragon, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012.


 



	
Tel-Aviv, Israel


April 3, 2013

	
/s/ 


KOST FORER GABBAY and KASIERER 


A Member of Ernst & Young Global
#### § 1222.87 Amendments.

Amendments to this subpart may be proposed from time to time by the Board or any interested person affected by the provisions of the Act, including the Secretary.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, David J.A. Flowers, certify that:1.      I have reviewed thisquarterly report onForm 10-Q ofDiscovery Holding Company;2.      Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report;3.      Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements and other financial information included inthis quarterly report fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;4.      The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:         a)     designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which thisquarterly report is being prepared;         b)     evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as ofthe end of the period covered by this quarterly report based onsuch evaluation; and         c)     disclosed in this quarterlyreport any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5.      The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):         a)     all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and         b)     any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:      August 11, 2006    /s/ David J.A. Flowers           David J.A. Flowers     Senior Vice President and Treasurer
#### § 15e.102 Application.

This part (§§ 15e.101-15e.170) applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency, except for programs or activities conducted outside the United States that do not involve individuals with handicaps in the United States.
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
Dongliang Su, certify that:




1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Jpak Group,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c) disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date: December
12, 2008




/s/
      Dongliang SuDongliang
      SuActing
      Chief Financial Officer
#### James Harrigan et al., Appellants, v Yvon St. Hilaire, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at a Trial Term, entered August 23, 1979 in Clinton County, which granted a motion for permission to serve an amended answer. This is a libel action which was commenced in May, 1976 and an answer was served in June, 1976. The case had been placed on the Trial Calendar when, in May, 1979, defendant moved to amend his answer to include the affirmative defenses of truth, executive privilege, qualified privilege, absolute privilege and peace officer’s privilege. Defendant’s motion was granted and this appeal ensued. Defendant maintains that the affirmative defense of truth was inadvertently omitted from the original answer. Defendant also avers that the remaining affirmative defenses sought to be added are based on information obtained shortly before the May, 1979 Supreme Court term as a result of a subpoena issued in September, 1978. The granting of the motion is within the sound discretion of the court and absent a showing of prejudice leave to amend should be freely granted *(Albany Crane Serv. v Pettibone Mulliken Corp.,*54 AD2d 794). In the present case, the delay alone did not constitute prejudice (see *699
      *Russell v City of Troy,*72 AD2d 660). In our view, plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate any prejudice. Upon consideration of the entire record, it is the opinion of this court that there was no abuse of discretion in granting the motion and, therefore, the order should be affirmed. Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**
I, Gregory F. Patton, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Northside Bancshares, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report.
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;
4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’sfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: June 20, 2005     /s/Gregory F. Patton     Gregory F. Patton, President and C.E.O.  (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1


 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual
Report  on  Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934,  as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in  all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the  Company.

This 12th day of April, 2004.



                              /s/  Holly  R  Hunt
                              -------------------
                              Holly  R.  Hunt
                              Principal  Executive  Officer  and
                              Chief  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7101

WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ARCHIE C. GEE, Warden; DOCTOR TOMASINO; DOCTOR

GRAIG; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DICKUS; NURSE

CAMPFIELD; NURSE GRAY; THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-976-DKC)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Allen Legg filed an untimely notice of appeal. We

dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing

notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods

are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have

thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of

appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The

only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court

extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on April 15, 1998. Legg’s

notice of appeal was filed on July 23, 1998, which is beyond the

thirty-day appeal period. Legg’s failure to note a timely appeal or

obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without

jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED