69518 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices 

Form No. Number of 

respondents 

Frequency of 

response 

Average 

burden per 

response 

(minutes) 

Total annual 

burden (hours) 

SSA–1002 ........................................................................................................ 7,500 1 30 3,750 

SSA–1003 ........................................................................................................ 25,000 1 30 12,500 

Total .......................................................................................................... 32,500 ........................ ........................ 16,250 

2. Student Reporting Form—20 CFR 

404.367 & 404.368—0960–0088. 

Sections 20 CFR 404.367 and 404.368 of 

the Code of Federal Regulations provide 

a student beneficiary must attend an 

educational institution full-time to 

qualify for Social Security benefits. SSA 

requires beneficiaries to report events 

that may cause a reduction, termination, 

or suspension of their benefits. SSA 

collects information on Form SSA–1383 

to determine if the change or event a 

student reports affects continuing 

entitlement to Social Security benefits. 

We also use the information to 

determine the correct benefit amounts. 

The respondents are Social Security 

student beneficiaries. 

Type of Request: Revision of an OMBapproved information collection. 

Form No. Number of 

respondents 

Frequency of 

response 

Average 

burden per 

response 

(minutes) 

Total annual 

burden (hours) 

SSA–1383 ........................................................................................................ 74,887 1 6 7489

SSA–1383–FC ................................................................................................. 113 1 6 11 

Total .......................................................................................................... 75,000 ........................ ........................ 7,500 

3. Protection and Advocacy for 

Beneficiaries of Social Security 

(PABSS)—Grant Awardees/Protection 

and Advocacy for Beneficiaries of Social 

Security (PABSS)— Beneficiaries—20 

CFR 435.51–435.52—0960–0768. In 

August of 2004, SSA announced its 

intention to award grants to establish 

community-based protection and 

advocacy projects in every State and 

U.S. Territory, as authorized under 

section 1150 of the Social Security Act. 

Potential awardees were protection and 

advocacy organizations (under Title I of 

the Developmental Disabilities 

Assistance and Bill of Rights Act) that 

submitted a timely application 

conforming to the requirements shown 

in the 2004 announcement. The projects 

SSA funds under the PABSS program 

are part of SSA’s strategy to increase the 

number of beneficiaries who return to 

work and achieve self-sufficiency as the 

result of advocacy or other services. The 

overall goal of the program is to provide 

information and advice about obtaining 

vocational rehabilitation and 

employment services, and to provide 

advocacy or other services a beneficiary 

with a disability may need to secure, 

maintain, or regain gainful employment. 

The PABSS Semi-Annual Program 

Performance Report collects statistical 

information from the various protection 

and advocacy (P&A) projects to manage 

program performance. SSA uses the 

information to evaluate the efficacy of 

the program and to ensure beneficiaries 

are receiving the dollars appropriated 

for PABSS services. The project data is 

valuable to SSA in its analysis of, and 

future planning for, the Social Security 

Disability Insurance (SSDI) and SSI 

programs. The respondents are the 57 

designated P&A project system sites (in 

each of the 50 States, the District of 

Columbia, and the U.S. Territories), and 

beneficiaries of SSDI and SSI programs. 

Type of Request: Revision of an OMBapproved information collection. 

Type of respondent Number of 

respondents 

Frequency of 

response 

Number of 

annual 

responses 

Average 

burden per 

response 

(minutes) 

Estimated 

annual burden 

(hours) 

PABSS Program Grantees .................................................. 57 2 114 60 114 

Beneficiaries ......................................................................... 5,000 1 1 15 1,250 

Totals ............................................................................ 5,057 ........................ ........................ ........................ 1,364 

Dated: November 8, 2010. 

Liz Davidson, 

Center Director, Center for Reports Clearance, 

Social Security Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28511 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice: 7165] 

Overseas Security Advisory Council 

(Osac) Renewal 

The Department of State has renewed 

the Charter of the Overseas Security 

Advisory Council. This advisory council 

will continue to interact on overseas 

security matters of mutual interest 

between the U.S. Government and the 

American private sector. The Council’s 

initiatives and security publications 

provide a unique contribution to 

protecting American private sector 

interests abroad. The Under Secretary 

for Management has determined that the 

Council is necessary and in the public 

interest. 

The Council consists of 

representatives from four (4) U.S. 

Government agencies and thirty (30) 

American private sector companies and 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 218 / Friday, November 12, 2010 / Notices 69519 

organizations. The Council will follow 

the procedures prescribed by the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA) (Pub. L. 92–463). Meetings will 

be open to the public unless a 

determination is made in accordance 

with Section 10(d) of the FACA, 5 

U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and (4), that a meeting 

or a portion of the meeting should be 

closed to the public. Notice of each 

meeting will be provided in the Federal 

Register at least 15 days prior to the 

meeting. 

For more information contact Marsha 

Thurman, Overseas Security Advisory 

Council, Bureau of Diplomatic Security, 

U.S. Department of State, Washington, 

DC 20522–2008, phone: 571–345–2214. 

Dated: October 15, 2010. 

Jeffrey W. Culver, 

Director of the Diplomatic Security Service. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28506 Filed 11–10–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–24–P 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE 

2010 Special 301 Out-of-Cycle Reviews 

of the Philippines and Thailand: 

Identification of Countries Under 

Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974: 

Request for Public Comment 

AGENCY: Office of the United States 

Trade Representative. 

ACTION: Request for written submissions 

from the public. 

SUMMARY: Section 182 of the Trade Act 

of 1974 (Trade Act) (19 U.S.C. 2242) 

requires the United States Trade 

Representative (USTR) to identify 

countries that deny adequate and 

effective protection of intellectual 

property rights (IPR) or deny fair and 

equitable market access to U.S. persons 

who rely on intellectual property 

protection. (The provisions of Section 

182 are commonly referred to as the 

‘‘Special 301’’ provisions of the Trade 

Act.) The USTR is required to determine 

which, if any, of these countries should 

be identified as Priority Foreign 

Countries. In addition, USTR has 

created a ‘‘Priority Watch List’’ and 

‘‘Watch List’’ under Special 301 

provisions. Placement of a trading 

partner on the Priority Watch List or 

Watch List indicates that particular 

problems exist in that country with 

respect to IPR protection, enforcement, 

or market access for persons relying on 

intellectual property. Countries placed 

on the Priority Watch List are the focus 

of increased bilateral attention 

concerning the problem areas. 

In the 2010 Special 301 Report 

(http://www.ustr.gov), USTR announced 

that, in order to monitor progress on 

specific IPR issues, Out-of-Cycle 

Reviews would be conducted for the 

Philippines and Thailand. USTR 

requests written submissions from the 

public concerning any act, policy, or 

practice that is relevant to the decision 

regarding whether the Philippines and 

Thailand should be identified under 

Section 182 of the Trade Act. 

DATES: Submissions from the general 

public must be received on or before 10 

a.m. on Friday, December 10, 2010. 

Foreign governments who choose to 

make written submissions may do so on 

or before 10 a.m. on Friday, December 

17, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: All comments should be 

sent electronically to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, [docket number 

USTR–2010–0035]. Submissions should 

contain the term ‘‘2010 Special 301 Outof-Cycle Review’’ in the ‘‘Type comment 

& Upload file’’ field on http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jared Ragland, Director, Intellectual 

Property and Innovation, Office of the 

United States Trade Representative, at 

(202) 395–4510. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to Section 182 of the Trade Act, USTR 

must identify those countries that deny 

adequate and effective protection for 

intellectual property rights or deny fair 

and equitable market access to U.S. 

persons who rely on intellectual 

property protection. Those countries 

that have the most onerous or egregious 

acts, policies, or practices and whose 

acts, policies, or practices have the 

greatest adverse impact (actual or 

potential) on relevant U.S. products are 

to be identified as Priority Foreign 

Countries. Acts, policies, or practices 

that are the basis of a country’s 

designation as a Priority Foreign 

Country are normally the subject of an 

investigation under the Section 301 

provisions of the Trade Act. USTR may 

not identify a country as a Priority 

Foreign Country if that country is 

entering into good faith negotiations or 

making significant progress in bilateral 

or multilateral negotiations to provide 

adequate and effective protection of 

intellectual property rights. In addition, 

USTR has created a ‘‘Priority Watch 

List’’ and ‘‘Watch List’’ under Special 

301 provisions. Placement of a trading 

partner on the Priority Watch List or 

Watch List indicates that particular 

problems exist in that country with 

respect to IPR protection, enforcement, 

or market access for persons relying on 

intellectual property. Countries placed 

on the Priority Watch List are the focus 

of increased bilateral attention 

concerning the problem areas. 

USTR requests that, where relevant, 

submissions mention particular regions, 

provinces, States, or other subdivisions 

of a country in which an act, policy, or 

practice deserve special attention. 

Submissions may report positive or 

negative developments with respect to 

these entities. 

Requirements for Comments: 

Comments should include a description 

of the problems experienced by the 

submitter and the effect of the acts, 

policies, and practices on U.S. industry. 

Comments should be as detailed as 

possible and should provide all 

necessary information for assessing the 

effect of the acts, policies, and practices. 

Any comments that include quantitative 

loss claims should be accompanied by 

the methodology used in calculating 

such estimated losses. Comments must 

be in English. All comments should be 

sent electronically to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, [docket number 

USTR–2010–0035]. 

To submit comments to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, enter docket 

number [USTR–2010–0035] on the 

home page and click ‘‘search.’’ The site 

will provide a search-results page listing 

all documents associated with this 

docket. Find a reference to this notice 

by selecting ‘‘Notice’’ under ‘‘Document 

Type’’ on the left side of the searchresults page, and click on the link 

entitled ‘‘Submit a comment.’’ (For 

further information on using the 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site, 

please consult the resources provided 

on the Web site by clicking on ‘‘How to 

Use This Site’’ on the left side of the 

home page). 

The http://www.regulations.gov site 

provides the option of providing 

comments by filling in a ‘‘Type 

comment & Upload file’’ field, or by 

attaching a document. It is expected that 

most comments will be provided in an 

attached document. If a document is 

attached, it is sufficient to type ‘‘See 

attached’’ in the ‘‘Type comment & 

Upload file’’ field. However, all 

submissions should contain the term 

‘‘2010 Special 301 Out-of-Cycle Review’’ 

in the ‘‘General Comments’’ field. 

A person requesting that information 

contained in a comment submitted by 

that person be treated as confidential 

business information must certify that 

such information is business 

confidential and would not customarily 

be released to the public by the 

submitter. Confidential business 

information must be clearly designated 

as such, the submission must be marked 

‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ at the top 

and bottom of the cover page and each 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES