alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31-2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas J. Riha, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT
   FUND VI, L.P., Series 13;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state  a  material fact  necessary to
   make the statements made, in  light  of  the  circumstances  under which such
   statements were made, not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by
   this quarterly report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and   I  are  responsible  for
   establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))  for  the  registrant  and  we
   have:

   (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  ensure   that
        material  information   relating   to  the  registrant,   including  its
        consolidated subsidiaries,  is  made  known to us by others within those
        entities,  particularly  during  the  period  in  which  this  quarterly
        report is being prepared;

   (b)  Evaluated the  effectiveness of  the  registrant's  disclosure  controls
        and procedures and presented in  this  report our conclusions  about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure  controls  and procedures, as of the end
        of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c)  Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the  registrant's  internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred  during  the registrant's
        most  recent  fiscal  quarter   that   has  materially  affected,  or is
        reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal
        control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal control over  financial reporting,  to
   the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the  registrant's  board
   of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


   (a)  All  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design or operation of internal
        controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's   ability  to
        record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial   data  and   have
        identified for the  registrant's  auditors any  material  weaknesses  in
        internal controls; and

   (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,  that  involves management  or other
        employees who have a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
        control over financial reporting.

Date:   August 21, 2006




/s/  Thomas J. Riha
-------------------
Senior Vice-President - Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ziff Davis Holdings Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
F. Callahan, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                         By: /s/ ROBERT F. CALLAHAN
                                             ---------------------------
                                                 ROBERT F. CALLAHAN
                                                 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


March 30, 2004
Beginning the Spiritual Journey 

HOW DO YOU DEFINE SPIRITUALITY? 

HOW DO YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY DEFINE 

SPIRITUALITY? 

HOW HAVE CHANGED SPIRITUALLY SINCE 

DEPLOYMENT, BOTH POSITIVE AND “ROOM FOR 

IMPROVEMENT” CHANGES? 

http://www.chapnet.army.mil 

The following suggestions and exercises can help guide you:

• Spend time in prayer, meditation and reflection. 

• Think with a positive outlook in place rather than a negative one. 

• Read Sacred Scripture. 

• Spent time in public gatherings with a like-minded community. 

• When reading Sacred Scripture, try to identify with a particular character. 

• When contemplating spirituality, take some time to assess yourself on the Spiritual 

Well Being Scale. 

• Consider all the words that fall into the concept of spirituality and decide which ones 

resonate with you the most. 

• Listen to music and decide what music strikes a spiritual cord with you. Uplifting 

music can be helpful to spiritual life, so explore how music can deepen and enrich 

your spirit in this way. 

• Since the body, soul, mind and spirit are interconnected, determine how you can use 

your spirituality to make tomorrow a better day and to be a person that your loved 

ones want to be around. 

• Try this spiritual exercise — for the next three days, ask yourself the following 

questions: 

1. How is today going to be a good day? 

2. How will I avoid slipping into my old patterns? 

3. Is their someone that I can help who is going through what I went through?
**Exhibit 23.01**

# **CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statements No. 333-59098 and No. 333-123494 on Form S-3 of ourreport dated February 22, 2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinionand includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for DefinedBenefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans”), appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K for Northern States Power Company-Minnesota for the yearended December 31, 2006.

 
| /S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Minneapolis, Minnesota             |   |   |
| February 22, 2007             |   |   |

 

 

73

----
§ 1580.503 Recovery of overpayments. ( a ) If the Administrator (FAS) determines that any producer has received any payment under this program to which the producer was not entitled, or has expended funds received under this program for purpose that was not approved by the Administrator (FAS) such producer will be liable to repay such amount. The Administrator (FAS) may waive such repayment if it is determined that: ( 1 ) The payment was made without fault on the part of the producer; and
( 2 ) Requiring such repayment would be contrary to equity and good conscience.
( b ) Unless an overpayment is otherwise recovered, or waived under paragraph (a) of this section, the Administrator (FAS), shall recover the overpayment as a debt following the procedures in 7 CFR part 3. The requirement for demand and notice and opportunity for a hearing under the debt collection procedures in 7 CFR part 3 shall satisfy the notice and hearing requirements under 19 U.S.C. 2401f(c), and the appeal procedures in § 1580.505 of this part shall not apply to collection of overpayments
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1560

___________

Curtis James Maxwell, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Northern District of Iowa.

Linn County Correctional Center, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: February 2, 2009

Filed: February 4, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action brought by Iowa inmate Curtis Maxwell

(Maxwell) against the Linn County Correctional Center (LCCC), Maxwell appeals

after the district court, citing the local rules, dismissed his complaint for failure to file

a timely resistance to LCCC’s motion to dismiss. We grant Maxwell’s renewed

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and affirm on other grounds.

Maxwell brought this action seeking damages and injunctive relief after he

allegedly fell from an upper bunk bed at LCCC. LCCC moved to dismiss for failure

to state a claim, and the district court granted LCCC’s motion based on Maxwell’s

failure to file a resistance within the time limit specified by the local rules.
-2-

To the extent the district court dismissed the complaint on the merits based on

Maxwell’s failure to file a timely resistance under the local rules, we conclude the

district court abused its discretion. See Nw. Bank & Trust Co. v. First Ill. Nat’l Bank,

354 F.3d 721, 725 (8th Cir. 2003) (stating this court reviews for abuse of discretion

the district court’s application of local rules); Johnson v. Boyd-Richardson Co., 650

F.2d 147, 149 (8th Cir. 1981) (concluding the failure to comply with the local rule

requiring an opposition to a motion to dismiss to be filed within five days “cannot be,

standing alone, a ground sufficient to extinguish a claim on its merits” and the district

court is free to consider the merits of a pending motion after the deadline for a

response passes, but “[i]t remains the court’s duty to inquire into the merits of the

motion and to grant or deny it, as the case may be, in accordance with law and the

relevant facts”). Nevertheless, we affirm the dismissal because we conclude

Maxwell’s complaint failed to state a viable claim. See Phipps v. FDIC, 417 F.3d

1006, 1010 (8th Cir. 2005) (explaining a dismissal may be affirmed “on any basis

supported by the record”); Owens v. Scott County Jail, 328 F.3d 1026, 1027 (8th Cir.

2003) (per curiam) (deciding “county jails are not legal entities amenable to suit”).

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
#### § 160.23 Disposition of samples.

All samples taken by an official inspector or submitted by an interested person shall become and remain the property of the Department, to be disposed of as the Administrator may determine.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1169 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1169

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to provide certificates of eligibility and award 
         letters to certain individuals using electronic means.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2023

  Mr. Arrington (for himself and Mr. Levin) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to provide certificates of eligibility and award 
         letters to certain individuals using electronic means.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA E-Notification Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF CERTIFICATES OF ELIGIBILITY AND AWARD LETTERS 
              USING ELECTRONIC MEANS.

    Chapter 36 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after section 3698 the following new section (and conforming the table 
of sections at the beginning of such chapter accordingly):
``Sec. 3698A. Provision of certificates of eligibility and award 
              letters using electronic means
    ``(a) Requirement.--Except as provided by subsection (b), the 
Secretary shall provide to an individual the following documents using 
electronic means:
            ``(1) A certificate of eligibility for the entitlement of 
        the individual to covered educational assistance.
            ``(2) An award letter regarding the authorization of the 
        individual to receive covered educational assistance.
    ``(b) Election To Opt Out.--An individual may elect to receive the 
documents specified in subsection (a) by mail rather than through 
electronic means under subsection (a). An individual may revoke such an 
election at any time, by means prescribed by the Secretary.
    ``(c) Covered Educational Assistance.--In this section, the term 
`covered educational assistance' means educational assistance under 
chapter 30, 33, or 35 of this title, or the high technology pilot 
program under section 116 of the Harry W. Colmery Veterans Educational 
Assistance Act of 2017 (Public Law 115-48; 38 U.S.C. 3001 note).''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1717.609 RUS approval of general manager. ( a ) If a borrower's mortgage or loan contract grants RUS the unconditioned right to approve the employment and/or the employment contract of the general manager of the borrower's system, such approval is hereby granted provided that the borrower is in compliance with all provisions of its loan documents and any other agreements with RUS.
( b ) If a borrower is in default with respect to any provision of its loan documents or any other agreement with RUS: ( 1 ) Such borrower, if directed in writing by RUS, shall replace its general manager within 30 days after the date of such written notice; and
( 2 ) Such borrower shall not hire a general manager without prior written approval by RUS.
| **NICOR                  INC.**                                                      |   |         |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------|
| **Subsidiary                  Listing**                                              |   |         |
| **December                  31, 2005**                                               |   |         |
|                                                                                 |   |         |
|                                                                                 |   |         |
| Subsidiary                                                                           |   | Jurisdiction |
| Northern                  Illinois Gas Company (doing business as Nicor Gas Company) |   | IL           |
| Birdsall,                  Inc.                                                      |   | FL           |
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warner Music Group Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Fleisher, Chief Financial Officer of Warner Music Group Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 8, 2007



/S/    MICHAEL D.
FLEISHERMichael D. Fleisher Chief Financial Officer
August 3, 2015

Mr. William Palmatary

Owner

Aerial West, LLC

834 15th Place, Suite B

Hermosa Beach, CA 90254

Dear Mr. Palmatary:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 

91.203(a) and (b), 91.205(b), 91.215, 91.401–91.417, and part 21of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should 

do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your April 18, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Aerial West, LLC into the 

public docket (No. FAA−2015−2050), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have. 

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69469-69470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-70,961; TA-W-70,961A]


LSI Corporation, 1110 American Parkway, Including On-Site Leased 
Workers From Spinnaker, Allentown, PA; LSI Corporation, 555 Union 
Boulevard, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Spinnaker, Allentown, 
PA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on January 28, 2010, applicable to workers of LSI Corporation, 1110 
American Parkway and 555 Union Boulevard, Allentown, Pennsylvania. The 
Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on March 
5, 2010 (75 FR 10320).
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers at the 
subject facilities are engaged in design, development, and marketing 
for semiconductor and storage systems.
    The company reports that workers leased from Spinnaker were 
employed

[[Page 69470]]

on-site at both Allentown, Pennsylvania locations of LSI Corporation. 
The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently 
under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Spinnaker working on-site 
at the 1110 American Parkway, Allentown, Pennsylvania and the 555 Union 
Boulevard, Allentown, Pennsylvania locations of LSI Corporation.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-70,961 and TA-W-70,961A are 
hereby issued as follows:

    All workers of LSI Corporation, 1110 American Parkway, including 
on-site leased workers from Spinnaker, Allentown, Pennsylvania (TA-
W-70,961) and LSI Corporation, 555 Union Boulevard, including on-
site leased workers from Spinnaker, Allentown, Pennsylvania, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
May 29, 2008, through January 28, 2012, and all workers in the group 
threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the 
date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of August 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-28484 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 4.34


PROMISSORY NOTE COMBINATION #4 EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


 


 


This Promissory
Note Combination #4 Extension Agreement, hereinafter referred to as “Combination #4 Extension”, entered into this Sixteenth
day of December, 2012, by and among Intellinetics, Inc, hereinafter called “Maker” and Alpharion Capital Partners,
hereinafter called “Lender”.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender have entered into a Promissory Note Combination #4 dated September 2, 2012 for the amount of ONE HUNDRED ELEVEN
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED and 00/100 DOLLARS ($111,500), hereinafter referred to as “Note Combination #4”. Said Note Combination
#4 was originally due on a due date of November 16, 2012. On November 16, 2012 the Note Combination #4 was extended for an additional
thirty days to December 16, 2012.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender desire to enter into this Combination #4 Extension Agreement in order to extend the due date of the Note Combination
#4 for an additional thirty days to January 15, 2013.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
it is dually agreed by both Maker and Lender to extend the due date of the Note Combination #4 to January 15, 2013.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Maker and Lender
has duly executed this


Combination #4 Extension as of the day and year above
first written.


 


	 	INTELLINETICS, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ William J. Santiago
	 	 
	 	ALPHARION CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Rick Hughes
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1412.83 Sharing of CTAP payments. ( a ) Each eligible producer on a farm may apply for and receive CTAP payments determined to be fair and equitable as agreed to by all producers on the farm and as approved by the county committee.
( b ) The provisions of § 1412.54 regarding the classification of leases apply to CTAP.
( c ) Shares of CTAP payments will be determined based on shares recorded on the application for CTAP payments for the particular program year. The provisions of § 1412.54 apply to shares of CTAP payments.