alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Atlantic Radiology Imaging, P.C. a/a/o Nigel L. Russell, Plaintiff-Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Alexander M. Tisch, J.), entered February 1, 2016, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Alexander M. Tisch, J.), entered February 1, 2016, affirmed, with $10 costs.</p><p>It being undisputed on this record that plaintiff failed to fully respond to the defendant-insurer's verification requests, defendant established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the underlying first-party no-fault claims as premature (<a href="../2011/2011_00214.htm" target="_blank"><i>see St. Vincent Med. Care, P.C. v. Country Wide Ins. Co.</i>, 80 AD3d 599</a>, 600 [2011]). Even accepting plaintiff's speculative assertion that defendant's followup verification request was issued two days beyond the 10-day period prescribed by the regulation (<i>see</i> 11 NYCRR 65-3.6), this does not, under the circumstances here presented, deprive defendant of the benefit of the tolling of the 30-day period during which an insurer must pay or deny the claim (<a href="../2009/2009_08585.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Infinity Health Prods., Ltd. v Eveready Ins. Co.</i>, 67 AD3d 862</a> [2009]; <a href="../2010/2010_52294.htm" target="_blank"><i>Triangle R Inc. v Praetorian Ins. Co.</i>, 30 Misc 3d 129</a>[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 52294[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2010]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concurI concurI concur<br>Decision Date: January 18, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
EXHIBIT 10.18

 

Compensatory Arrangements with Non-Employee Directors

 

At a meeting held on June 16, 2010, the board of directors voted unanimously to reinstate director fees. Each non-employee director (other than the chairman of the board) of PLC Systems Inc. (the “Company”) receives $1,000 for each board meeting he attends in person and $500 for each board meeting he participates by means of teleconference. The chairman of the board receives $1,500 for each board meeting that he attends in person and $750 for each board meeting he participates by teleconference. The Company reimburses its directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the board of directors and committees of the board of directors.

 

At the board meeting held on June 16, 2010, the board of directors voted unanimously to revise the policy regarding the annual grant of stock options to non-employee directors. Non-employee directors (other than the chairman of the board) will now receive an annual grant of an option to purchase 22,500 shares of the Company’s common stock, such option to vest in four equal quarterly installments. The chairman of the board will receive an annual grant of an option to purchase 45,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, such option to vest in four equal quarterly installments. The annual grants to non-employee directors are generally made on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders.  All such options will have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2017

NO. 03-17-00097-CV

Appellants, Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the 

State of Texas; and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State

of Texas// Cross-Appellant, Anatole Partners III, LLC

v.

Appellee, Anatole Partners III, LLC// Cross-Appellees, 

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas;

and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas 

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, FIELD, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION—OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on February 2, 2017. Having 

reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the 

Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to 

this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
**Exhibit 99.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of M.L.Macadamia Orchards, L.P. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the periodended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), we, the undersigned management of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, 

 

(1)  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
| /s/ John W.A. Buyers                   |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| John W.A. Buyers                       |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer  |
| March 17, 2003                         |
|                                   |
| /s/Dennis J. Simonis                   |
|                                   |
| Dennis J. Simonis                      |
| President and Chief  Operation Officer |
| March 17, 2003                         |
|                                   |
| /s/ Wayne W. Roumagoux                 |
|                                   |
| Wayne W. Roumagoux                     |
| Chief Financial Officer                |
| March 17, 2003                         |

 

 

----
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 15296 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:01

- cr
- 06242

- WPD

- 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus
BILLY CLEVELAND, Defendant

- A ppellant.

_________________ _______ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ ( June 15, 2015 )
Before WILLIAM PRYOR , JORDAN and JILL PRYOR , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 14-15296 Date Filed: 06/15/2015 Page: 1 of 22 Billy Cleveland appeals pro se the denial of his motion for a se ntence
reduction

. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) . Cleveland based his motion on Amendment 782

t o the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm.
The district court did not err when it denied Cleveland’s motion for a
reduction of his sentence. Cleveland , whose sentence i s ba sed on the career offender guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, not on the drug quantity tables, id. § 2D1.1,
is ine ligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment 7 82

. See United States v.
Lawson , 686 F.3d 1317, 1321 (11th Cir. 2012); United States v. Moore , 541 F.3d 1323, 1327

– 30 (11th Cir. 2008). Cleveland challenges his classif ication as a career offender , but that challenge is outside the limited scope of section 3582(c)(2). See
United States v. Bravo , 203 F. 3d 778, 78 0

– 81 (11th Cir. 2000)

. We AFFIRM the den ial of Cleveland’s motion to reduce. Case: 14-15296 Date Filed: 06/15/2015 Page: 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

The Board of Directors

of Ceridian Corporation:

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (Nos. 33-56822, 333-56828, 333-56818, 333-56820, 333-64944,333-82466 and 333-122959) on Form S-8 of Ceridian Corporation of our reports dated April 20, 2005, with respect tothe consolidated balance sheets of Ceridian Corporation as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and therelated consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders’equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004,and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual reporton Form 10-K of Ceridian Corporation.

 

Our report dated April20, 2005, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2004, expresses our opinion thatCeridian Corporation did not maintain effective internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2004, because of the effect of material weaknesseson the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains anexplanatory paragraph that describes those material weaknesses.

 

Our report dated April20, 2005 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the accompanyingconsolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003 and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows forthe years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 have been restated.

 

Our report dated April 20,2005, notes that the company adopted the provisions of Statement of FinancialStandards No. 142, “Goodwill and other Intangible Assets,” onJanuary 1, 2002.

 

 

 

 

/s/ KPMG

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

April 20, 2005

 

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1824 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to submit to Congress an annual report on the performance 

of the regional offices of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 30, 2013 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Mr. LANCE, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. 

DEFAZIO, Ms. GABBARD, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. HORSFORD, Mr. JONES, Ms. 

KUSTER, Mr. MAFFEI, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. O’ROURKE, Ms. SINEMA, 

Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Ms. SLAUGHTER, and Mr. BARBER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit to Congress an 

annual report on the performance of the regional offices 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Regional Office 

5 Accountability Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1824 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORT ON PERFORMANCE OF REGIONAL 

2 OFFICES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VET3 ERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 Section 7734 of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in the first sentence, by inserting before the 

7 period the following: ‘‘and on the performance of 

8 any regional office that fails to meet its administra9 tive goals’’; 

10 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

11 (3) by redesignating paragraph (3) as para12 graph (4); and 

13 (4) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol14 lowing new paragraph (3): 

15 ‘‘(3) in the case of any regional office that, for 

16 the year covered by the report, did not meet the ad17 ministrative goal of no claim pending for more than 

18 125 days and an accuracy rating of 98 percent— 

19 ‘‘(A) a signed statement prepared by the 

20 individual serving as director of the regional of21 fice as of the date of the submittal of the report 

22 containing— 

23 ‘‘(i) an explanation for why the re24 gional office did not meet the goal; 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1824 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) a description of the additional re2 sources needed to enable the regional office 

3 to reach the goal; and 

4 ‘‘(iii) a description of any additional 

5 actions planned for the subsequent year 

6 that are proposed to enable the regional of7 fice to meet the goal; and 

8 ‘‘(B) a statement prepared by the Under 

9 Secretary for Benefits explaining how the fail10 ure of the regional office to meet the goal af11 fected the performance evaluation of the direc12 tor of the regional office; and’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Syntec Biofuel Inc.








/s/
      George Kosanovich
            
            Date:
      March 28, 2008George
      Kosanovich
              Director,
      CEO
§ 1580.501 Administration. ( a ) The petition process will be administered by FAS. FAS will publish in the Federal Register the filing dates for commodity groups to file petitions.
( b ) FSA will administer the producer application and payment process.
( c ) State and county FSA committees and representatives do not have the authority to modify or waive any of the provisions of this part.
( d ) The technical assistance process and the recommendation for approval of all producer business plans will be under the general supervision of NIFA. NIFA may award the technical assistance and services to a state cooperative extension service.
( e ) The Deputy Administrator may, in consultation with the Administrator, FAS, authorize the State and County committees to waive or modify non-statutory deadlines or other program requirements in cases where lateness or failure to meet such other requirements by applicants does not adversely affect the operation of the program.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Mentoring as a Component of Reentry      

# Resource: Mentoring as a Component of Reentry

This resource (PDF, 45 pages), developed by the National Reentry Resource Center, provides recommendations to help community-based organizations integrate adult mentoring into existing reentry programming. This resource can also help organizations build effective partnerships with correctional agencies, learn about promising practices in adult mentoring, such as peer mentoring, and increase effective data collection and evaluation through stronger collaboration between reentry programs and research partners.

http://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/6.27.17_Mentoring-as-a-Component-of-Reentry.pdf?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resource
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
annual report of ATP Oil & Gas Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of the Company, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 15, 2012 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Albert L. Reese Jr.
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Albert L. Reese Jr.    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### HEMSTREET v. DECAUVILLE AUTOMOBILE CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by William F. Hemstreet against the Decauville Automobile Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, on conditions stated in order. Order filed.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Presidential Documents 68679 

Executive Order 13557 of November 4, 2010 

Providing an Order of Succession Within the Department of 

Justice 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform 

Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq., it is hereby ordered that: 

Section 1. Order of Succession. Subject to the provisions of section 2 of 

this order, the following officers, in the order listed, shall act as and perform 

the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, during any period 

in which the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate 

Attorney General, and any officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or 

otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office 

of Attorney General, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned 

above is able to perform the functions and duties of that office: 

(a) United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia; 

(b) United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota; and 

(c) United States Attorney for the District of Arizona. 

Sec. 2. Exceptions. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed 

in section 1 of this order in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, 

shall act as Attorney General pursuant to this order. 

(b) No individual listed in section 1 shall act as Attorney General unless 

that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies 

Reform Act of 1998. 

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains 

discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in 

designating an acting Attorney General. 

Sec. 3. Executive Order 13481 of December 9, 2008, is revoked. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
68680 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 9, 2010 / Presidential Documents 

Sec. 4. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or 

benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any 

party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its 

officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

November 4, 2010. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28365 

Filed 11–8–10; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with MISCELLANEOUSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
# Официален вестник C 145/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 145 |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 6225 април 2019 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 145

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 6225 април 2019 г.

---

| Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Информация |
| | ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ, ОРГАНИТЕ, СЛУЖБИТЕ И АГЕНЦИИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ |
| | Европейски парламентСъвет |
| 2019/C 145/01 | Изявление на Комисията във връзка с Регламент (ЕС) 2019/632 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за изменение на Регламент (ЕС) No 952/2013 с цел да се удължат преходните мерки за използване на средства, различни от средствата за електронна обработка на данни, предвидени в Митническия кодекс на Съюза, и съвместното изявление на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по този въпрос | 1 |

Съдържание

Страница

IV   Информация

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ, ОРГАНИТЕ, СЛУЖБИТЕ И АГЕНЦИИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ

Европейски парламентСъвет

2019/C 145/01

Изявление на Комисията във връзка с Регламент (ЕС) 2019/632 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за изменение на Регламент (ЕС) No 952/2013 с цел да се удължат преходните мерки за използване на средства, различни от средствата за електронна обработка на данни, предвидени в Митническия кодекс на Съюза, и съвместното изявление на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по този въпрос

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

IV Информация

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ИНСТИТУЦИИТЕ, ОРГАНИТЕ, СЛУЖБИТЕ И АГЕНЦИИТЕ НА ЕВРОПЕЙСКИЯ СЪЮЗ

Европейски парламент Съвет

| 25.4.2019 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | C 145/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2019

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

C 145/1

---

Изявление на Комисията във връзка с Регламент (ЕС) 2019/632 на Европейския парламент и на Съвета за изменение на Регламент (ЕС) No 952/2013 с цел да се удължат преходните мерки за използване на средства, различни от средствата за електронна обработка на данни, предвидени в Митническия кодекс на Съюза, и съвместното изявление на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по този въпрос (1)

(2019/C 145/01)

Комисията приветства съгласието на Европейския парламент и на Съвета по предложението за удължаване на крайния срок за преходните мерки за използване на средства, различни от средствата за електронна обработка на данни, предвидени в Митническия кодекс на Съюза.

Комисията отчита съвместното изявление на Европейския парламент и на Съвета, в което се отбелязва, че евентуалната бъдеща работа на Европейската сметна палата по оценка на докладите, изготвени от Комисията на основание член 278а от Митническия кодекс на Съюза, може да допринесе за избягването на по-нататъшни забавяния.

Ако Европейската сметна палата реши да подложи на оценка докладите на Комисията, Комисията — както се изисква по член 287, параграф 3 от Договора за функционирането на Европейския съюз — ще ѝ съдейства изцяло и ще вземе изцяло предвид съответните констатации.

---

(1)  ОВ L 111, 25.4.2019 г., стр 54.

---