alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.01

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                   (Form 10-K)

      The undersigned, a Director of Ceridian Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby make, nominate and appoint JOHN R.
EICKHOFF and GARY M. NELSON, and each of them, to be my attorney-in-fact for
three months from the date hereof, with full power and authority to execute for
and on behalf of the undersigned the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
provided that such Form 10-K is first reviewed by the Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company and by my attorney-in-fact, and his name, when
thus signed, shall have the same force and effect as though I had manually
signed such Form 10-K.

      I have signed this Power of Attorney as of February 1, 2002.


                                            /s/ Bruce R. Bond
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Bruce R. Bond


                                            /s/ William J. Cadogan
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            William J. Cadogan


                                            /s/ Nicholas D. Chabraja
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Nicholas D. Chabraja


                                            /s/ Robert H. Ewald
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Robert H. Ewald


                                            /s/ Ronald T. LeMay
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Ronald T. LeMay


                                            /s/ George R. Lewis
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            George R. Lewis


                                            /s/ Ronald L. Turner
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Ronald L. Turner


                                            /s/ Carole J. Uhrich
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Carole J. Uhrich
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theAnnual Report of M.L. Macadamia Orchards, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/Afor the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersignedmanagement of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Dennis J. Simonis                 |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                  |
| Dennis J. Simonis                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 10, 2007                       |

 

----
FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO ESCROW AGREEMENT








This
      First Amendment to Escrow Agreement (“First Amendment”) by and between NICOR
      Inc. (“Depositor”) and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A, (“Escrow Agent”)
      is made as of the 28th day of December, 2006.





WITNESSETH





WHEREAS,
      Depositor and Escrow Agent are parties to that certain Escrow Agreement executed
      by Depositor on June 28, 2006 and acknowledged by Escrow Agent on July 6, 2006
      (the “Original Escrow Agreement”); and





WHEREAS,
      Depositor and Escrow Agent desire to amend the Original Escrow
      Agreement.





NOW
      THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, Depositor and Escrow Agent
      agree
      as follows:





1.
            Unless
                otherwise provided in this First Amendment, capitalized terms shall
                have
                the meaning assigned to such terms in the Original Escrow Agreement.





2.
            Instruction
                4(d) of the Original Escrow Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety
                and
                the following new instruction 4(d) shall be substituted
                therefore:





“(d)
      Escrow Agent shall release the Deposited Amount to Depositor in the event the
      funds have not been distributed pursuant to instruction 4(a), 4(b) or 4(c)
      by
      March 31, 2007.”





3.
            Except
                as amended by this First Amendment, the Original Escrow Agreement
                shall
                remain in full force and effect in accordance with its original
                terms.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, Depositor and Escrow Agent hereby execute this First Amendment
      effective as of the date first above written.








NICOR
      INC.  THE
      BANK
      OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A.





/s/
      GERALD P. O'CONNOR     /s/
      DANIEL G. DONOVAN


Gerald
      P.
      O’Connor      Daniel
      G.
      Donovan


Vice
      President Finance     Vice
      President


and
      Treasurer
#### § 1230.23 Research.

*Research* means any action designed to advance, expand, or improve the image, desirability, nutritional value, usage, marketability, production, or quality of porcine animals, pork, or pork products, including the dissemination of the results of such research.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jason Nathaniel WILLIAMSON, Appellant.

No. 06-2800.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 5, 2007.

Filed: Nov. 8, 2007.

Charles J. Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Appellee.

John P. Messina, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Iowa, Des Moines, IA, for Appellant.

Jason Nathaniel Williamson, Anamosa, IA, pro se.

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jason Nathaniel Williamson appeals the 235-month prison sentences the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to bank robbery with a dangerous weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d), and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(i). His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentences, at the top of the advisory Guidelines range, are unreasonable, because the court gave undue weight to a robbery victim’s testimony as compared to Williamson’s mental illness and sentenced him beyond what was minimally sufficient.

The presumption of reasonableness accorded a sentence within the Guidelines range, *see Rita v. United States,*—U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462-68, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007), may be rebutted by showing that the district court failed to consider a factor that should have received significant weight, gave significant weight to an irrelevant factor, or otherwise committed a clear error of judgment, *see United States v. Davidson,*437 F.3d 737, 741 (8th Cir.2006). The record supports that the district court properly considered only relevant factors, including the offense circumstances and Williamson’s extensive criminal history, as well as his serious mental illness; and that the court did not commit a clear error of judgment in choosing sentences at the top of the Guidelines range. Thus, we conclude that the sentences are not unreasonable. *See United States v. Haack,*403 F.3d 997, 1003 (8th Cir.2005) (standard of review).

Having reviewed the record under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw on condition *618that counsel inform appellant about the procedures for filing petitions for rehearing and for certiorari.

1

. The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUsing neural networks in software repositoriesThe first topic is an exploration of the use of neural network techniques to improve the effectiveness of retrieval in software repositories. The second topic relates to a series of experiments conducted to evaluate the feasibility of using adaptive neural networks as a means of deriving (or more specifically, learning) measures on software. Taken together, these two efforts illuminate a very promising mechanism supporting software infrastructures - one based upon a flexible and responsive technology.Document ID19920022353Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsEichmann, David*(West Virginia Univ. Morgantown., United States)*Srinivas, Kankanahalli*(West Virginia Univ. Morgantown., United States)*Boetticher, G.*(West Virginia Univ. Morgantown., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1992Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-190641NAS 1.26:190641Accession Number92N31597Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCC9-16PROJECT: RICIS PROJ. SE-43Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920022353.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Form 20-F annual report of Schering Aktiengesellschaft (the "Company") for the period ending December 31,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "annual report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that:

1.	the annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated: March    5, 2004 | By: /s/HUBERTUS ERLENName:	Hubertus ErlenTitle:	Chief Executive Officer                             |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                                                                                      |
| Dated: March    5, 2004 | By: /s/JÖRG SPIEKERKÖTTERName:	Jörg SpiekerkötterTitle:	Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Bruce M. Eckert, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Bruce M. Eckert    
|                       |  |  |  | Bruce M. Eckert        
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION        1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | the                  Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July                  2, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the                  information contained in the Company’s Annual report on Form 10-Q for the                  fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2005 fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### NATIONAL CONTRACTING CO., Respondent, v. HUDSON RIVER WATER POWER CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by the National Contracting Company against the Hudson River Water' Power Company. R. L. Hand, for appellant. L. L. Kellogg, for respondent.

PER CUiRIAM.

Order modified by allowing the plaintiff to withdraw demurrer on payment of a trial fee, and the defendant’s taxable disbursements of the trial, the costs and taxable disbursements of the appeal to this court from the judgment entered upon the report of the referee, $10 costs of opposing the motion, and the costs and disbursements of this appeal, and, as so modified, affirmed. Settle order on notice.
Exhibit 10.1

 

April 5, 2013

 

CombiMatrix Corporation

Attn: Scott Burell

300 Goddard, Suite 100
 Irvine, CA 92618

 

Gentlemen:

 

Reference is made to that certain HLM Rights Agreement dated as of April 1, 2011 by and between CombiMatrix Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and HLM Venture Partners III, L.P. (the “Rights Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Rights Agreement.

 

The undersigned acknowledges that Mr. Marty Felsenthal recently resigned from the Board and that no HLM Designee or Independent Designee currently is a member of the Board.  The undersigned further acknowledges that the Company desires to reduce its authorized number of directors such that no vacancies currently will exist for an HLM Designee or an Independent Designee (the “Board Reduction”).

 

The undersigned hereby (i) consents to the Board Reduction; (ii) agrees that such Board Reduction does not constitute a breach or default under the Rights Agreement; and (iii) waives the requirements set forth in Sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(ii) and 3(a)-(c) of the Rights Agreement.

 

This waiver shall be a continuing waiver that shall remain in full force and effect until revoked by HLM upon forty-five (45) days’ prior written notice to the Company.

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 











 

	
Sincerely,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
HLM VENTURE PARTNERS III, L.P.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
HLM Venture Associates III, LLC
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Its General Partner
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/S/ MARTY FELSENTHAL
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Marty Felsenthal
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Partner
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Acknowledged and Accepted:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
COMBIMATRIX CORPORATION
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/S/ SCOTT BURELL
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Scott Burell
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
CFO and Secretary
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
cc:
    	
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Attn: Parker Schweich, Esq.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 2000
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
    	
 
    


 

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO WAIVER REGARDING HLM RIGHTS AGREEMENT
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1333 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1333

  To provide for a comfortable and safe temperature level in dwelling 
   units receiving certain Federal housing assistance, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2023

Ms. Wilson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a comfortable and safe temperature level in dwelling 
   units receiving certain Federal housing assistance, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Temperature Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. COMFORTABLE AND SAFE TEMPERATURE LEVEL IN FEDERALLY ASSISTED 
              HOUSING.

    (a) Public Housing and Project-Based Assistance.--The United States 
Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 8(o)(13) (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(13)), by adding 
        at the end the following:
                    ``(P) Maintaining temperature level in units.--The 
                Secretary may require the owner of a dwelling unit 
                receiving assistance under a housing assistance payment 
                under this paragraph to ensure that the dwelling unit 
                maintains a comfortable and safe temperature level 
                ranging from 71 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit.''; 
                and
            (2) in section 9 (42 U.S.C. 1437g), by adding at the end 
        the following:
    ``(p) Use of Funds To Maintain Temperate Level in Units.--With 
respect to a public housing dwelling unit, the Secretary may use 
amounts in the Capital Fund or the Operating Fund to ensure that the 
dwelling unit maintains a comfortable and safe temperature level 
ranging from 71 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit.''.
    (b) Supportive Housing for the Elderly.--Section 202 of the Housing 
Act of 1959 (12 U.S.C. 1701q) is amended by striking the last two 
subsections (each designated as subsection (m)) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(m) Maintaining Temperature in Units.--The Secretary may require 
the owner of housing assisted under this section to ensure that each 
unit in that housing maintains a comfortable and safe temperature level 
ranging from 71 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50648

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GREGORY BEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-36-1-SS

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gregory Ben

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro,

377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed

(U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held that Blakely v.

Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), does not apply to the United

States Sentencing Guidelines. The Government’s motion for

summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.