alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jennifer North, Chief Financial Officer of ZIM Corporation, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-KSB/A-3 of ZIM Corporation;


2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
         statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
         to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
         such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
         covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this report, fairly present in all material
         respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
         of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.


Date: April 21, 2006
/s/ Jennifer North

-----------------------
Jennifer North
Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32(i) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Far East Energy
Corporation (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Michael R. McElwrath, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Dated: July 19, 2004 /s/ Michael R. McElwrath  
 38
§ 1487.6 Application review and formation of agreements. ( a ) *General.* Proposals received in accordance with the announcement and this part will undergo a multi-phase review by CCC to determine eligibility for the program, the qualifications, quality, and appropriateness of proposed projects, and the reasonableness of proposed project budgets.
( b ) *Evaluation criteria.* CCC will review all proposals for eligibility and completeness. CCC will evaluate and score each proposal against the factors described in the NOFO. The purpose of this review is to identify meritorious proposals, recommend an appropriate funding level for each proposal, and submit the proposals and funding recommendations to appropriate officials for decision. CCC may, when appropriate to the subject matter of the proposal, request the assistance of other U.S. Government experts in evaluating the merits of a proposal. Demonstration of substantial U.S. industry participation in or financial or other support of a proposal will be a positive factor in the consideration of proposals. All reviewers will be required to sign a conflict of interest form, and when conflicts of interests are identified the reviewer will be recused from the objective review process.
( c ) *Approval decision.* CCC will approve those applications that it determines best satisfy the criteria and factors specified in the announcement and this part. All decisions regarding the disposition of an application are final.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 13, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Lines Project Committee will be held Tuesday, April 13, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information please contact Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: March 1, 2021.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2021-04536 Filed 3-4-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Report of Independent Accountants

Board of Directors
Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the
accompanying "Report of Management on Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.'s
Internal Control Over the Preparation of Monthly Servicer's Certificates
Relative to the Servicing of Automobile Loan Receivables," that Chevy
Chase Bank, F.S.B. maintained effective internal control over the
preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing
of automobile loan receivables owned by Chevy Chase Auto Receivables
Trusts Series 2000-2, 2001-1 and 2001-2 (collectively referred to as the
"Trusts" herein) as of September 30, 2004, based on criteria established
in "Internal Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Chevy Chase Bank,
 F.S.B.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over the preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative
to the servicing of automobile loan receivables owned by the Trusts.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of the internal control
over the preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the
servicing of automobile loan receivables owned by the Trusts, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of the internal control,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatements due
to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projections of any
evaluation of the internal control over the preparation of monthly
Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing of automobile loan
receivables owned by the Trusts to future periods are subject to the risk
that the internal control may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.
maintained effective internal control over the preparation of monthly
Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing of automobile loan
receivables owned by the Trusts as of September 30, 2004 is fairly stated,
in all material respects, based on criteria established in "Internal
Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of Chevy Chase
Bank, F.S.B. and U.S. Bank National Association, Wilmington Trust
Company, Fitch IBCA, Moody's Investment Services and Standard &
Poor's, and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other
than these specified parties.




December 1, 2004                    Ernst & Young LLP
#### *Bain vs. Harrison.*

Chancery.

Case 162.

Error to the Fayette Circuit; Thomas M. Hickey, Judge.

*Chancery jurisdiction. Defence at law. Injunction.*

June 19.

monttobe5 entered a-pi”®* him*. n°a]a[^” of a note, which, upon dischargeable chancellor will not grant relief, upon t¿atChCjudgment was for too much, complete,

*Haggin*and Loughborough, for plaintiff; Richardson, for defendant.

Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Harrison obtained a judgment on the following note, for the nominal amount in specie:

> “269 *5*1-2. Lexington, May 8, 1821.

> *“Ninety*days after date, we jointly and severally promise to pay to Robert C. Harrison, or order, two hundred and sixty-nine dollars 5 1-2 cents, for value received; witness our hands and seals, the date above. *Payment in state paper.*

> “PATTERSON BAIN, (Seal.)

> “E. YEISER, (Seal.)

> “THOS. BODLEY, (Seal.)”

A bill in chancery was filed to enjoin the on the ground that it was for too much, and thatHarrison ought to be compelled to accept bank paper, in discharge of it, which he refused to do. He answered the bill, denying its allegations; and on bill and answer, the injunction was dissolved, and the bill dismissed. To reverse this decree, this writ of error is prosecuted.

The decree is right. The injunction was improvidently granted. The bill contained no equity. The note, *on its face,*was payable in paper, and in nothing else. Harrison,, therefore, had a right to recover judgment for no more than the value of the paper, in specie. If the court gave him judgment for more, the error could have been corrected by this court, on an appeal or writ of error. But the chancellor surely, cannot correct or reverse the judgment.

Bain’s remedy was at law. By defending the suit,, he could have prevented a judgment for more than the value of the bank paper. He had, therefore, no pretext for appealing to the chancellor. Besides, the allegations of his bill were denied, and. there was no proof.

Wherefore, the decree is affirmed.
#### § 160.44 Other duties of licensed inspectors.

A licensed inspector may perform duties other than those of an official inspector, to the extent indicated by the accredited processor and not disapproved in writing by the Administrator: *Provided,* That such additional duties not pertaining to the official inspection work shall not be permitted to interfere with the proper performance of the duties of the licensee as an official inspector.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Survey on Bullying of AAPI Students      

# Survey on Bullying of AAPI Students

The Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Bullying Prevention Task Force created a survey to gather information about what bullying of AAPI students looks like, who is being bullied, on what basis, and whether AAPI students are talking to adults and peers in their schools and communities about the bullying they experience. Survey responses will inform the direction of the AAPI Task Force in the coming months.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1a1ZUAS0I8V32E3Q1__0lcqHH85zUtoOTDSZ6kQaiXuU/viewform?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=events-recent
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVJATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

FrankHinshaw, SKYDIVING SCHOOL, INC., d/b/a SKYDIVE 

### HA WAil AND ISLAND SKYDIVING, LLC COMPLAINANT


### v. THE STATE OF HA WAil RESPONDENT. DocketNo. 16-12-04

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-AssistedAirport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules ofPractice). Pursuant to the Rules ofPractice, §16.11(a), the date by which the Director, FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Field Operations will issue a Director's Determination in this matter is hereby extended to on or before September 30, 2013.

Randall S. Fiertz Director, Office ofAirport Compliance and Field Operations 

## JUN 13 2013 DateCERTU'ICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that onJune 

# 13. ,2013, I placed inthe United States mail (first class, postage paid), a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime addressed to: Frank Hinshaw Skydiving School Inc.,

d/b/a Skydive Hawaii PO Box 75520 Honolulu, HI 96836 Complainant Richard J. Durden Attorney at Law 27987 Richmond Hill Road Conifer, CO 80433 Counsel for Complainant Glenn I. Kimura Deputy Attorney General Department ofthe Attorney General, State ofHawaii 465 S. King Street, Room 300 Honolulu, HI 96813 Counsel for Respondent Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 

# Q -r

# ~onfcJ4~- 0ffice ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis
§ 15e.170 Compliance procedures. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this section applies to all allegations of discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities conducted by the agency.
( b ) The agency shall process complaints alleging violations of section 504 with respect to employment according to the procedures established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1614 pursuant to section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791).
( c ) The Director, Office of Advocacy and Enterprise, shall be responsible for coordinating implementation of this section and shall make the determinations described in paragraph (g) of this section. Complaints may be sent to Office of Advocacy and Enterprise, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250.
( d ) The agency shall accept and investigate all complete complaints for which it has jurisdiction. All complete complaints must be filed within 180 days of the alleged act of discrimination. The agency may extend this time period for good cause.
( e ) If the agency receives a complaint over which it does not have jurisdiction, it shall promptly notify the complainant and shall make reasonable efforts to refer the complaint to the appropriate Government entity.
( f ) The agency shall notify the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board upon receipt of any complaint alleging that a building or facility that is subject to the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), is not readily accessible to and usable by individuals with handicaps.
( g ) Within 180 days of the receipt of a complete complaint for which it has jurisdiction, the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the investigation in a letter containing— ( 1 ) Findings of fact and conclusions of law;
( 2 ) A description of a remedy for each violation found; and
( 3 ) A notice of the right to appeal.
( h ) Appeals of the findings of fact and conclusions of law or remedies must be filed by the complainant within 90 days of receipt from the agency of the letter required by § 15e.170(g). The agency may extend this time for good cause.
( i ) Timely appeals shall be accepted and processed by the head of the agency.
( j ) The head of the agency shall notify the complainant of the results of the appeal within 60 days of the receipt of the request. If the head of the agency determines that additional information is needed from the complainant, he or she shall have 60 days from the date of receipt of the additional information to make his or her determination on the appeal.
( k ) The time limits cited in paragraphs (g) and (j) of this section may be extended with the permission of the Assistant Attorney General.
( l ) The agency may delegate its authority for conducting complaint investigations to other Federal agencies, except that the authority for making the final determination may not be delegated to another agency.
[58 FR 57697, 57699, Oct. 26, 1993, as amended at 58 FR 57697, Oct. 26, 1993]
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER



I, Jerrell W. Shelton, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment
No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Cryoport, Inc.; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: September 23, 2016



| | /s/ JERRELL W. SHELTON              
| | ------------------------------------
| | JERRELL W. SHELTON                  
| | Chief Executive Officer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 1220.216 Procedure. ( a ) Attendance of at least 12 members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum at a properly convened meeting of the Committee. Any action of the Committee shall require the concurring votes of at least two-thirds (2 ⁄ 3) of the members present. The Committee shall establish rules concerning timely notice of meetings.
( b ) When in the opinion of the chairperson of the Committee emergency action must be taken before a meeting can be called, the Committee may take action upon the concurring votes of no less than twelve of its members by mail, telephone, facsimile, or telegraph. Action taken by this emergency procedure is valid only if all members are notified and provided the opportunity to vote and any telephone vote is confirmed promptly in writing. Any action so taken shall have the same force and effect as though such action had been taken at a properly convened meeting of the Committee.
( c ) A member may not cast votes by proxy.
Exhibit 13.1




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with annual report of CIBT Education Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended August 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Toby Chu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  June 15, 2012
  By: /s/ Toby Chu
 Name: Toby Chu
 Title: Chief Executive Officer
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chak Shing
Tsoi, the Chief Executive Officer of Jinhao Motor Company (the Company), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.       The Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2.       Information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has executed this statement this 12th day of November,
2010.

/s/ Chak Shing
TsoiChak Shing Tsoi Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Jinhao Motor Company and will be retained by Jinhao
Motor Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.1

                                    [LOGO]

                       Independent Accountants' Consent

The Board of Directors
ImagicTV Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of ImagicTV Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2002 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of ImagicTV Inc. as at February 28, 2002 and 2001
and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended February
28, 2002, which report appears in the Company's annual report on Form 20-F.

Yours very truly,

[LOGO]

Chartered Accountants

Toronto, Canada
May 22, 2002

                                       i