alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
M. P. No. 80-95.

#### State v. Robert G. Cole.

*Dennis J. Boberts II,*Attorney General, for plaintiff, *Robert G. Cole,*pro se, for defendant.

Treating the petitioner’s writ of error as a petition for writ of habeas corpus, said petition is denied.
Exhibit 31-2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas J. Riha, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT
   FUND VI, L.P., Series 14;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state  a  material fact  necessary to
   make the statements made, in  light  of  the  circumstances  under which such
   statements were made, not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by
   this quarterly report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and   I  are  responsible  for
   establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))  for  the  registrant  and  we
   have:

   (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  ensure   that
        material  information   relating   to  the  registrant,   including  its
        consolidated subsidiaries,  is  made  known to us by others within those
        entities,  particularly  during  the  period  in  which  this  quarterly
        report is being prepared;

   (b)  Evaluated the  effectiveness of  the  registrant's  disclosure  controls
        and procedures and presented in  this  report our conclusions  about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure  controls  and procedures, as of the end
        of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c)  Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the  registrant's  internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred  during  the registrant's
        most  recent  fiscal  quarter   that   has  materially  affected,  or is
        reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal
        control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal control over  financial reporting,  to
   the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the  registrant's  board
   of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


   (a)  All  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design or operation of internal
        controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's   ability  to
        record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial   data  and   have
        identified for the  registrant's  auditors any  material  weaknesses  in
        internal controls; and

   (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material,  that  involves management  or other
        employees who have a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
        control over financial reporting.

Date:   August 21, 2006




/s/  Thomas J. Riha
-------------------
Senior Vice-President - Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Homassist Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Irene Braham, President/CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 14, 2006

/s/ Irene BrahamIrene Braham, President/CEO
exhibit1027.htm


 







Exhibit 10.27













DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM












Until further revision, our Director Compensation Program is as described in this Exhibit 10.27.







Directors who are not our employees or employees of one of our subsidiaries receive a $25,000 annual retainer and no meeting attendance fees.  An additional annual retainer of $7,500 is paid to the Audit Committee Chairman; $5,000 to the Compensation Committee Chairman; and $5,000 to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman. For the additional time related to attending committee meetings, Audit Committee members also receive an annual fee of $5,000; Compensation Committee members also receive an annual fee of $4,000; and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members also receive an annual fee of $4,000.







In lieu of stock options that had previously been a part of outside director compensation, Directors who are not our employees or employees of one of our subsidiaries receive a grant of Class A common stock equivalent to $25,000 at the time of our annual meeting.  Directors can only sell these shares if, after the sale, they maintain a minimum of $100,000 in value of Class A common stock.




 


Back to Form 10-K
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned,the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone InvestmentCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2009 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewithby the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Dated: November 3,2009

 
| /s/ David  Gladstone                  |     |
|---------------------------------------|----------|
| David Gladstone                       |     |
| *Chief  Executive Officer and*        | * * |
| *Chairman  of the Board of Directors* | * * |

 

----
#### § 15.60 Scope of rules.

The rules of practice and procedure in this subpart supplement §§ 15.9 and 15.10 of subpart A of this part and govern the practice for hearings, decisions, and administrative review conducted by the Department of Agriculture, pursuant to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, section 602 (78 Stat. 252) and this part, title 7, CFR, except these rules shall not apply to any stage of a proceeding which has occurred prior to the effective date hereof.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 2, 2013

Order 

Clerk

October 2, 2013

146289(83)(84)

RAMA MADUGULA, 

Plaintiff/Counter-DefendantAppellee, 

v SC: 146289 

COA: 298425 

Washtenaw CC: 08-000537-CK 

BENJAMIN A. TAUB, 

Defendant/Counter-PlaintiffAppellant, 

and 

DATASPACE, INC., and ANDREW 

FLOWER,

Defendants. 

______________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motions by plaintiff-appellee to extend the time 

to file its brief are GRANTED. The brief will be considered timely filed if submitted on 

or before October 29, 2013.
**Exhibit 13.1**

CERTIFICATION BY CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with Syngenta AG’s Annual Report on Form 20-F (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. 

Michael Pragnell, the Chief Executive Officer and Domenico Scala, the Chief Financial Officer of Syngenta AG, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

| 1.     | the Report        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange    Act ; and                                                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | the information contained        in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition    and results of operations of Syngenta AG. |

March 24, 2004 

|   | /s/ Michael          Pragnell     |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                                        |
| Name:  | Michael Pragnell                  |
| Title: | Chief Executive          Officer  |

|   | /s/ Domenico          Scala  |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |                                   |
| Name:  | Domenico Scala                    |
| Title: | Chief Financial          Officer  |

----
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1466.8 Conservation practices. ( a ) NRCS will determine the conservation practices for which participants may receive program payments and provide a list of eligible practices to the public.
( b ) Payment will not be made to a participant for conservation practices that— ( 1 ) Either the applicant or another producer has initiated or implemented prior to application for the program; or
( 2 ) Has been initiated or implemented prior to contract approval, unless a waiver was granted by the Chief prior to the practice implementation.
( c ) Unless waived for circumstances as determined by the Chief, a participant is eligible for payments for water conservation and irrigation-related conservation practices only on land that has been irrigated for 2 of the last 5 years prior to application for assistance.
( d ) Upon the development of a new technology or management approach that provides a high potential for optimizing conservation benefits, NRCS may approve an interim conservation practice standard that incorporates the new technology or management approach and provide financial assistance for pilot work to evaluate and assess the performance, efficiency, and effectiveness of the new technology or management approach.
( e ) NRCS will at least annually consult with State Technical Committees, Tribal Conservation Advisory Councils, local work groups, and other stakeholders to identify conservation practices with appropriate purposes and the criteria for their application to address priorities to establish wildlife habitat including— ( 1 ) Upland wildlife habitat;
( 2 ) Wetland wildlife habitat;
( 3 ) Habitat for threatened and endangered species;
( 4 ) Fish habitat;
( 5 ) Habitat on pivot corners and other irregular areas of a field; and
( 6 ) Other types of wildlife habitat, as determined by NRCS.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6456

JAMES EARL GIBSON, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. DOUGLAS M. VAUGHAN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00181-RLW)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Earl Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Earl Gibson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gibson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     In connection with the Chesapeake Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 3, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge: 
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Chesapeake Corporation.  
/s/ Thomas H. Johnson                                         
Date:  November 12, 2004
Thomas H. Johnson 
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer)           
 /s/ Andrew J. Kohut                                            
Date:  November 12, 2004
Andrew J. Kohut 
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)                
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Chesapeake Corporation and will be retained by Chesapeake Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.     ******
#### Mayme Hildebrandt, formerly Mayme Saurin, appellee, v. City of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,302.

Opinion filed June 26, 1929.

Samuel A. Ettelson, Corporation Counsel and William D. Saltiel, City Attorney, for appellant; Abraham E. Golan, Wilbert M. Foley, Assistant City Attorneys, E. Marshall Amberg and Roy S. Gaskill, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel. William Gillespie, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 1280.609 Farm Service Agency State Executive Director.

*Farm Service Agency State Executive Director* , Farm Service Agency State Executive Director, also referred to as “SED,” means the person within a State who is appointed by the Secretary to be responsible for the day-to-day operation of the FSA State Office, or the person acting in such capacity.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Report of ZIM Corporation, a Canadian corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB /A for the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Cowpland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Michael Cowpland

-------------------- 

Michael Cowpland

Chief Executive Officer

 November 17 , 2005
§ 1486.401 Eligible cost share. ( a ) In calculating the amount of cost share that it will make and the cost share U.S. entities or a State or local agency will make, a Recipient may include those costs (or such prorated costs) not proscribed under § 1486.402 if: ( 1 ) The expenditures are necessary and reasonable for accomplishment of the Recipient's overall EMP;
( 2 ) The expenditures are not included as cost share for any other Federal award;
( 3 ) The expenditures are not paid by the Federal Government under another Federal award, except where the Federal statute authorizing a program specifically provides that Federal funds made available for such program can be applied to matching or cost sharing requirements of other Federal programs; and
( 4 ) The cost share is made during the period covered by the agreement.
( b ) Cost share must be included in a project's line item budget.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Community National Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Paul J. Scheuermann, Chief Executive Officer, and Gregory G.

Eagan, principal financial officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|/s/ Paul J. Scheuermann |  | /s/ Gregory G. Eagan       
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Paul J. Scheuermann     |  | Gregory G. Eagan           
|Chief Executive Officer |  | Principal financial officer
|                        |  |                            
|March 15, 2005          |  | March 15, 2005             
|                        |  |
#### § 1223.19 Promotion.

*Promotion* means any action taken to present a favorable image of pecans to the general public and the food industry for the purpose of improving the competitive position of pecans both in the United States and abroad and stimulating the sale of pecans. This includes paid advertising and public relations.
IB 

House Calendar No. 38 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1574 

[Report No. 113–141] 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to rename 

a site of the park. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2013 

Mr. TURNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

JULY 8, 2013 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1574 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act 

of 1992 to rename a site of the park. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1574 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE DAYTON AVIATION HER4 ITAGE PRESERVATION ACT OF 1992. 

5 Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage 

6 Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘Aviation Center’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘National Museum’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 38 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1574 

[Report No. 113–141] 

A BILL 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to rename a site of the park. 

JULY 8, 2013 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 1221.2 Board.

*Board* or *Sorghum Promotion, Research, and Information Board* means the administrative body established pursuant to § 1221.100, or such other name as recommended by the Board and approved by the Secretary.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1791 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify 

authority under existing grant guidance authorizing use 

of Urban Area Security Initiative and State Homeland 

Security Grant Program funding for enhancing medical 

preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities. 
2 

•HR 1791 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Preparedness 

5 Allowable Use Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 

7 FUNDS FOR ENHANCING MEDICAL PRE8 PAREDNESS, MEDICAL SURGE CAPACITY, 

9 AND MASS PROPHYLAXIS CAPABILITIES. 

10 Section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

11 (6 U.S.C. 609) is amended— 

12 (1) in subsection (a), by redesignating para13 graphs (10) through (13) as paragraphs (11) 

14 through (14), respectively, and by inserting after 

15 paragraph (9) the following: 

16 ‘‘(10) enhancing medical preparedness, medical 

17 surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities, in18 cluding the development and maintenance of an ini19 tial pharmaceutical stockpile, including medical kits, 

20 and diagnostics sufficient to protect first responders, 

21 their families, immediate victims, and vulnerable 

22 populations from a chemical or biological event;’’; 

23 and 
3 

•HR 1791 EH

1 (2) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking 

2 ‘‘(a)(10)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)(11)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 3, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1791 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to 

pabilities. medical surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis cafunding for enhancing medical preparedness, and State Homeland Security Grant Program authorizing use of Urban Area Security Initiative codify authority under existing grant guidance