alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Podcast: The Science of School Safety      

# Podcast: The Science of School Safety

In this Justice Today podcast episode, experts discuss school safety and school violence topics such as: gun violence, bullying, school climate, and mental health. A full transcript is provided. **Learn more.**
June 15, 2015 

Ms. Kimberly Murphy 

Blue Moon 

7245 W. Alaska Drive 

Lakewood, CO 80226 

Dear Ms. Kimberly Murphy: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 8, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1522), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
EX-10.6(a)



 Exhibit 10.6(a) 
 June 1, 2012 
 John W. Henry & Company, Inc. 

301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200 
 Boca Raton, Fl.
33431-4931 
 Attn: Mr. Ken Webster 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr.
Webster: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Westport JWH Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 JWH Master Fund LLC 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 JWH Global Analytics Fund L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian Centner
		 	  

		 	Brian Centner
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director
	
	JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Kenneth S. Webster
		 	  



			
		
	Print Name:	 	 /s/ Kenneth S. Webster

		 	  



			
		
	BC/sr
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs
auditors and the audit committee of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2008
    /s/ Charles HoflandCharles Hofland, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer (Principal Executive Officer)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComparison of 3-D viscous flow computations of Mach 5 inlet with experimental dataA time marching 3-D full Navier-Stokes code, called PARC3D, is validated for an experimental Mach 5 inlet configuration using the data obtained in the 10 x 10 ft supersonic wind tunnel at the NASA Lewis Research Center. For the first time, a solution is obtained for this configuration with the actual geometry, the tunnel conditions, and all the bleed zones modeled in the computation. Pitot pressure profiles and static pressures at various locations in the inlet are compared with the corresponding experimental data. The effect of bleed zones, located in different places on the inlet walls, in eliminating the low energy vortical flow generated from the 3-D shock-boundary layer interaction is simulated very well even though some approximations are used in applying the bleed boundary conditions and in the turbulence model. A further detailed study of the effect of individual bleed ports is needed to understand fully the actual mechanism of efficiently eliminating the vortical flow from the inlet. A better turbulence model would help to improve the accuracy even further in predicting the corner flow boundary layer profiles.Document ID19900010774Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsReddy, D. R.*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Cleveland OH., United States)*Benson, T. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Weir, L. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102518NASA-TM-102518E-5322Meeting InformationMeeting: Aerospace Sciences MeetingLocation: Reno, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 8, 1990End Date: January 11, 1990Sponsors:AIAAAccession Number90N20090Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900010774.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1469.36 Misrepresentation and scheme or device. ( a ) If the Department determines that a participant erroneously represented any fact affecting a CSP determination made in accordance with this part, the participant's conservation stewardship contract will be terminated immediately in accordance with § 1469.25(b). The participant will forfeit all rights for future contract payments, and must refund payments received, plus interest, and liquidated damages as described in § 1469.25.
( b ) A producer who is determined to have knowingly: ( 1 ) Adopted any scheme or device that tends to defeat the purpose of CSP;
( 2 ) Made any fraudulent representation; or
( 3 ) Misrepresented any fact affecting a CSP determination, must refund to NRCS all payments, plus interest, and liquidated damages as determined in accordance with § 1469.25 received by such participant with respect to all contracts. In addition, NRCS will terminate the participant's interest in all conservation stewardship contracts.
( c ) If the producer acquires land subsequent to enrollment in CSP, that land is not considered part of the agricultural operation; however, if the land was previously owned or controlled by them before the date of enrollment and after May 13, 2002, then NRCS will conduct an investigation into the activity to see if there was a scheme or device.
#### § 1400.211 Persons and legal entities not considered to be actively engaged in farming.

Any person or legal entity that does not satisfy all of the applicable provisions of §§ 1400.201 through 1400.210 and a landowner who rents land to a farming operation for cash or a crop share guaranteed as to the amount of the commodity will not be considered to be actively engaged in farming with respect to the farming operation.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of Specialty Laboratories, Inc. pertaining to the Specialty Laboratories, Inc. 2000
Stock Incentive Plan and Specialty Laboratories, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-52348) of our report dated January 30, 2002 (except for Note 14, as to which the date
is February 28, 2002), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Specialty Laboratories, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
31, 2001.

|                                      |  | /s/ERNST & YOUNG
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|Los Angeles, California
March 8, 2002 |  |                 

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern
Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin M. Shook, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                       |  | 
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Kevin M. Shook                    |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | Kevin M. Shook                        |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |  | 



42
#### *Feemster & al. vs. Johnson.*

^Jovehaht.

Case 22.

ISrror to Montgomery Circuit; Silas W. Robbiks, Judge.

*Current paper.*

February *2.*

Judgment apon a note, stipulating to pay “current paper,” when lor more than the nominal amount of the note, erroneous. Not in. dispensable', to give the debtor the election to < pay in Ken. tucky or Commonwealth’s ipank paper»

*Feemster,*for plaintiff; Wickliffe, for defendant.

Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

It seems to the court that the judgment in this case having been rendered, on a note for “current paper” for a larger sum than the nominal amount of the note, it is, therefore erroneous. It would have been better too, although, perhaps, not indispensable, that the judgment should have been for Kentucky or commonwealth’s bank paper, thereby giving the debtors the election to pay either, as the contract might have been discharged in either.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded, that the judgment may be entered correctly.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Douglas E. Barnett, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of UGS Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Omitted as permitted;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: August 15, 2005         /s/     Douglas E. Barnett   Douglas E. Barnett   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
54
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**TELETRACKING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**FRANK J. GORI, MARK JULIANO, GENE NACEY, LORRAINE NACEY, STEPHEN** 
**P. NASH, BRIAN E. SCHULIGER, INSIGHT VENTURE MANAGEMENT,**  **L.L.C. AND INSIGHT TTT, LLC.,**

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 355 WAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 22nd day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**
SERVED: MAY 15, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

RYAN CORNWALL 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0117 

(Civil Penalty Action.) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013CE090058) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Ryan Cornwall, Respondent 

4924 Papaya Drive 

Fair Oaks, CA 95628 

ONE COPY 

Mark G. Camacho, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Central Region ACE-7, Room 506 DOT Building 

901 Locust 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3765 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable-Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 . 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff As.sistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0117 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by' expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. · 

2
§ 1207.325 Procedure. ( a ) Each State (or district or group of States established pursuant to § 1207.320) which has a member on the Board shall be entitled to not less than one vote for any production up to 1 million hundredweight, plus one additional vote for each additional 1 million hundredweight of production, or major fraction thereof, as determined by the latest crop production annual summary report issued by the Crop Reporting Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture. The casting of the votes for each State shall be determined by the members of the Board from that State.
( b ) A majority of the Board members shall constitute a quorum and any action of the Board shall require a majority of concurring votes of those present and voting. At assembled meetings all votes shall be cast in person or by duly authorized proxy.
( c ) For routine and noncontroversial matters which do not require deliberation and the exchange of views, and for matters of an emergency nature when there is not enough time to call an assembled meeting, the Board may act upon a majority of concurring votes of its members cast by mail, telephone, electronic mail, facsimile, or any other means of communication. Any vote cast by telephone shall be confirmed promptly in writing.
[37 FR 5008, Mar. 9, 1972, as amended at 57 FR 40083, Sept. 2, 1992; 89 FR 863, Jan. 8, 2024]