U. S. Department of Transportation August 27, 2015

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);14 CFR Part 21;14 CFR 

61.113 (a) & (b); 91.7 (a);91.9 (b) (2);91.103(b); 91.109;91.119; 91.121; 

91.151(a);91.203(a) & (b);91.405 (a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2);91.417 (a) & 

(b). 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform 

Act) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Snaproll Media LLC, developer and operator of Small Unmanned 

Aircraft Systems (“sUASs”) equipped to conduct aerial photography for the motion picture and 

television industry for scripted closed set filming, hereby applies for an exemption from the 

listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its sUASs, so 

long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may

be established by the FAA as required by Section 333. 

As described more fully below, the requested exemption would permit the operation of 

small, unmanned and relatively inexpensive sUAS under controlled conditions in airspace that is 

1) limited 2) predetermined 3) controlled as to access and 4) would provide safety enhancements 

to the already safe operations in the film and television industry presently using conventional 

aircraft. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of 

Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities to “...establish requirements for the 

safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” Section 333(c) of the 

Reform Act. 

The name and address of the applicant is: 

Infinite Horizons

Attn:Brad Clark

Ph:404-395-1711

Email:forgedfirefighter@gmail.com

Address: 4254 B.Clark Rd., Gainesville, GA 30506
Page Two 

Regulations from which the exemption is requested: 

14 CFR Part 21 

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b) 

14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) 

14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a) 

14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2) 

14 C.F.R. 91.103 

14 C.F.R. 91.109 

14 C.F. R. 91.119 

14 C.F.R. 91.121 

14 CFR 91.151 (a) 

14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) 

14 CFR 91.405 (a) 

14 CFR 407 (a) (1) 

14 CFR 409 (a) (2) 

14 CFR 417 (a) & (b) 

This exemption application is expressly submitted to fulfill Congress’ goal in passing 

Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act. This law directs the Secretary of Transportation 

to consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national 

airspace system (NAS) before completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332 of the 

Reform Act. In making this determination, the Secretary is required to determine which types of 

UASs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public or pose a threat to national 

security in light of the following:

• The UAS’s size, weight, speed, and operational capability;

• Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and 

• Operation of the UAS within visual line of sight of the operator. 

Reform Act § 333 (a). Lastly, if the Secretary determines that such vehicles “may operate safely 

in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation 

of such aircraft in the national airspace system.” Id. §333(c) (emphasis added)1. 

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the authority to issue exemptions. 

This statutory authority by its terms includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined 

under §40101 of the Act, that includes sUASs, from the requirement that all civil aircraft must 

have a current airworthiness certificate

____________________________________________________________________________

1Applicant interprets this provision to place the duty on the Administrator to not only process 

applications for exemptions under section 333, but for the Administrator to craft conditions for 
the safe operation of the UAS, if it should be determined that the conditions set forth herein do 

not fulfill the statutory requirements for approval.

Page Three 

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation prescribed 

under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections 44702-44716 of this title if the 

Administrator finds the exemption in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. §44701(f) See also 49 USC 

§44711(a); 49 USC §44704; 14 CFR §91.203 (a) (1). 

Infinite Horizons’s sUASs are rotorcraft, weighting 55 or fewer lbs. including payload. 

They operate, under normal conditions at a speed of no more than 50 knots and have the 

capability to hover, and move in the vertical and horizontal plane simultaneously. They will 

operate only in line of sight and will operate only within the sterile area described in the 

Confidential Aerial photography and aerial cinematography Manual, attached as Exhibit 1 

(hereinafter “the Manual”)3. Such operations will insure that the sUAS will “not create a hazard 

to users of the national airspace system or the public.”

Given the small size of the sUASs involved and the restricted sterile environment within 

which they will operate, the applicant falls squarely within that zone of safety (an equivalent 

level of safety) in which Congress envisioned that the FAA must, by exemption, allow 

commercial operations of UASs to commence immediately. Also due to the size of the UASs 

and the restricted areas in which the relevant sUASs will operate, approval of the application 

presents no national security issue. Given the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act, 

the authority contained in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of 

safety surrounding the proposed operations, and the significant public benefit, including 

enhanced safety, reduction in environmental impacts, including reduced emissions associated 

with allowing UASs for movie and television operations, the grant of the requested exemptions 

is in the public interest. Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that the FAA grant the 

requested exemption without delay. 

AIRCRAFT AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY 

The applicant proposes that the exemption requested herein apply to civil aircraft that 

have the characteristics and that operate with the limitations listed herein. These limitations 

provide for at least an equivalent or even higher level of safety to operations under the current 

regulatory structure because the proposed operations represent a safety enhancement to the 

already safe movie and television filming operations conducted with conventional aircraft. 

These limitations and conditions to which Infinite Horizons agrees to be bound when 

conducting commercial operations under an FAA issued exemption include:
Page Four 

1. The sUAS will weigh less than 55 lbs. 

2. Flights will be operated within line of sight of a pilot and/or observer.

3. Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be 25 minutes. Flights will 

be terminated at 25% battery power reserve should that occur prior to the 25 minute limit. 

4. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet AGL or, not more than 

200 feet above an elevated platform from which filming is planned. 

5. Minimum crew for each operation will consist of the sUAS Pilot, the Visual Observer, 

and the Camera Operator. 

6. sUAS pilot will be an FAA licensed airman with at least a private pilot’s certificate 

and third class medical. The observer will hold at least a third class medical. 

7. sUAS Pilot will be Pilot in Command (PIC). If a pilot certificate holder other than the 

sUAS Pilot, who possess the necessary PIC qualifications, is also present on set (i.e. the 

Aerial Coordinator), that person can also be designated as PIC. 

8. The UAS will only operate within a confined “Sterile Area” as defined in the Manual. 

Section H, I and J of the Manual requires the establishment of a “Security Perimeter” for 

the flight operations area. 

9. A briefing will be conducted in regard to the planned sUAS operations prior to each 

day’s production activities. It will be mandatory that all personnel who will be 

performing duties within the boundaries of the safety perimeter be present for this 

briefing. 

10. The operator will file a FAA Form 7711-1, or its equivalent, as modified in light of 

the requested exemption, with the appropriate Flight Standards District Office.

11. The operator will obtain the consent of all persons involved in the filming and ensure 

that only consenting persons will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight operation, and 

this radius may be reduced to 30 feet based upon an equivalent level of safety

determination, as required by Section K of the Manual. With the advanced permission of 

the relevant FSDO, operations at closer range can be approved. 

12. The operator will submit a written Plan of Activities to the FSDO three days before 

the proposed shoot as required in Section K of the Manual. 

13. Pilot and observer will have been trained in operation of UAS generally and received 

up-to-date information on the particular UAS to be operated as required Sections M and 

N of the Manual. 

14. Observer and pilot will at all times be able to communicate by voice and/or text. 

15. Written and/or oral permission from the relevant property holders will be obtained. 

16. All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or 

city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate 

governmental agencies.

17. If the sUAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UAS will have 

capability to return to a pre-determined location within the Security Perimeter and land. 

18. The sUAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredicted obstacles or 

emergencies.
Page Five 

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) (1) 

Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural 

requirements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 

(a) (1). Given the size and limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be 

utilized by the Applicant, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements 

of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of the Reform Act. The 

Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act both 

authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness 

certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and 

proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular UAS. In all cases, an analysis 

of these criteria demonstrates that the UAS operated without an airworthiness certificate, 

in the restricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or 

safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an 

airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and conditions proposed. 

The sUAS to be operated hereunder is less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, carries 

neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, 

and operates exclusively within a secured area as set out in the Manual. Unlike other 

civil aircraft, operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by

both the operator, pursuant to the Manual’s requirements, and under the requirements and 

in compliance with local public safety requirements, to provide security for the area of 

operation as is now done with conventional filming. The FAA will have advance notice 

of all operations. These safety enhancements, which already apply to civil aircraft 

operated in connection with motion picture and television production, provide a greater 

degree of safety to the public and property owners than conventional operations 

conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. 

Lastly, application of these same criteria demonstrates that there is no credible threat to 

national security posed by the UAS, due to its size, speed of operation, location of 

operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and inability to carry a 

substantial external load. 

14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft 

The regulation requires: 

When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the 

registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light-sport 

category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the 

operator must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, 

cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 

inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light-sport," 

"experimental," or "provisional," as applicable. 
Even though the UAS will have no airworthiness certificate, an exemption may be 

needed as the UAS will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the word

Page Six 

“Experimental” can be placed. Given the size of the sUAV, two-inch lettering will be 

impossible. The word “Experimental” will be placed on the fuselage in compliance with §45.29 

(f). 

The equivalent level of safety will be provided by having the sUAV marked on its 

fuselage as required by §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer and others working with the sUAV

will see the identification of the UAS as “Experimental.” The FAA has issued the following 

exemptions to this regulation to Exemptions Nos. 10700, 8738, 10167 and 10167A. 

14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in Command. 

Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non-commercial operations. 

Because the UAS will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can 

achieve the equivalent level of safety of current operations by requiring the PIC operating 

the aircraft to have a private pilot’s license rather than a commercial pilot’s license to 

operate this small UAS. Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries the pilot and 

passengers, the sUAS is remotely controlled with no living thing on board. The area of 

operation is controlled and restricted, and all flights are planned and coordinated in 

advance as set forth in the Manual. The level of safety provided by the requirements 

included in the Manual exceeds that provided by a single individual holding a 

commercial pilot’s certificate operating a conventional aircraft. The risks associated with 

the operation of the sUAS are so diminished from the level of risk associated with 

commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when drafted, that allowing operations of 

the sUAS as requested with a private pilot as the PIC exceeds the present level of safety 

achieved by 14 C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b). 

14 C.F.R. §91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness. 

The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy

condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this 

exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness. 

Given the size of the aircraft and the requirements contained in the Manual for maintenance and 

use of safety check lists prior to each flight, as set forth in Sections J, L and Q, an equivalent 

level of safety will be provided. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft. 

Section 91.9 (b) (2) provides: 

No person may operate a U.S.-registered civil aircraft ... 

(2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by 

§21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved 
airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved manual material, markings, and 

placards, or any combination thereof.

Page Eight

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the UAS 

as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the 

property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property owner and 

participants in the filming activity, all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight 

operations as set forth in Section K of the Manual. Compared to flight operations with aircraft or 

rotorcraft weighting far more than the maximum 55lbs. proposed herein and the lack of 

flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those presently 

presented with conventional aircraft operating at or below 500 AGL in the movie industry. In 

addition, the low-altitude operations of the sUAS will ensure separation between these smallUAS operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 

91.119. 

14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings 

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by 

reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate 

altimeter setting available before departure.” As the sUAS may not have a barometric altimeter, 

but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety 

will be achieved by the operator, pursuant to the Manual and Safety Check list, confirming the 

altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions 

Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under 

VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel 

to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed – (1) During the 

day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 

minutes.” 

The battery powering the sUAS provides approximately 40 minutes of powered flight. 

To meet the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, sUAS flights would be limited to 

approximately 10 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the UAS’s proposed flight area 

and the location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a longer time frame for 

flight in daylight or night VFR conditions is reasonable. 

Applicant believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of 

prior exemptions. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operate 

without compliance with FAR 91.151 (a)). Operating the small UAS, in a tightly controlled area 

where only people and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will 

be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that 

Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS. 

Additionally, limiting sUAS flights to 10 minutes would greatly reduce the utility for which the 

exemption will be granted. 
Applicant believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 

30 minutes or 25% of battery power whichever happens first. This restriction would be more.

Page Nine 

than adequate to return the sUAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited 

operating area. 

Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 

5745, 10673, and 10808. 

14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration 

The regulation provides in pertinent part: 

(a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it 

has within it the following: 

(1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate. . . . 

(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate 

required by paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued 

under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to 

passengers or crew. 

The UAS fully loaded weighs no more than 55 lbs and is operated without an onboard 

pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration documents or to 

display them on the sUAS. 

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground 

control point where the pilot flying the sUAS will have immediate access to them, to the extent 

they are applicable to the sUAS. The FAA has issued numerous exemptions to this regulation. 

A representative sample of other exceptions includes Exemption Nos. 9565, 9665, 9789, 9789A, 

9797, 9797A, 9816A, and 10700. 

14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections 

These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft 

inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as 

provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of 

this chapter...,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43. 

Given that these section and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness 

certificate, these sections will not apply to the applicant. Maintenance will be accomplished by

the operator pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook as referenced in the 

Manual.(See Sections L and Q) An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because these 

small UASs are very limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in restricted 

areas for limited periods of time. If mechanical issues arise the UAS can land immediately and 

will be operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. As provided in the Manual, the operator 
will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required 

maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the 

person most

Page Ten 

familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to 

provide the equivalent level of safety. 

********* 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the 

Federal Register, should it be determined that publication is needed: 

Applicant seeks an exemption from the following rules: 

14 C.F.R. §21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R 45.23(b);14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113( a) &

(b);91.7 (a); 91.9 (b) (2);91.103(b);91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a);91.203(a) 

and (b); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.409 (a) (2) and 91.417 (a) & 

(b) to operate commercially a small unmanned vehicle (55lbs or less) in aerial 

photography and aerial cinematography. 

Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of sUASs in the film industry

will enhance safety by reducing risk. Conventional film operations, using jet or piston power 

aircraft, operate at extremely low altitudes just feet from the subject being filmed and in extreme 

proximity to people and structures; and present the risks associated with vehicles that weigh in 

the neighborhood of 4,000lbs., carrying large amounts of jet A or other fuel (140 gallons for jet 

helicopters). Such aircraft must fly to and from the film location. In contrast, a sUAS weighing 

fewer than 55 lbs. and powered by batteries eliminates virtually all of that risk given the reduced 

mass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. The sUAS is carried to the film set and not 

flown. The sUAS will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the 

risks associated with manned aircraft flights. 

The operation of small UASs, weighting less than 55 lbs., conducted in the strict 

conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the 

exemptions requested herein, including exempting the applicant from the requirements of Part 21 

and allowing commercial operations. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to 

the ground, and in a sterile environment and, as a result, are far safer than conventional 

operations conducted with turbine helicopters operating in close proximity to the ground and 

people. 

Privacy 

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property

owner’s prior consent and knowledge. Filming will be of people who have also 

consented to being filmed or otherwise have agreed to be in the area where filming will 

take place.

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012--size, 

weight, speed, operating capabilities, proximity to airports and populated areas and operation 
within visual line of sight and national security – provide more than adequate justification for the 

grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of applicant’s UAS in the 

aerial photography and aerial cinematography industry.

Page Eleven

Sincerely,

Brad Clark

Infinite Horizons

Owner