alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
/•> 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

..j[:mRTMENT OF 

JnANSPORMTiCN 

VLKE F OPERATIONS 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION jp -., __ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ^"' A 1 = : b j 

WASHINGTON, DC 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive 

Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and 

Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

DOT-OST-1995-272 

formerly 

Docket 49233 

STATUS REPORT 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: August 26. 201 i. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Samuel PodberesIcy~ 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Dayton Lehman, Jr. 

Deputy Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

William J. Wa 

Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

1 hereby certify that on this 26st day of August, 2011, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By Personal Service 

The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202)366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leiand Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408
§ 1710.400 Purpose. ( a ) This subpart establishes policies and requirements that apply to loans and loan guarantees to finance Energy Efficiency and Conservation programs (EE Programs) undertaken by an eligible utility system to finance Demand side management, energy efficiency and conservation, or on-grid and off-grid renewable energy system programs that will result in the better management of their system load growth, a more beneficial load profile, or greater optimization of the use of alternative energy resources in their service territory. These programs may be considered an essential utility service.
( b ) ( 1 ) The goals of an eligible Energy Efficiency project eligible for funding under this program and Subpart H include: ( i ) Increasing energy efficiency at the end user level;
( ii ) Modifying electric load such that there is a reduction in overall system demand;
( iii ) Effecting a more efficient use of existing electric distribution, transmission and generation facilities;
( iv ) Attracting new businesses and creating jobs in rural communities by investing in energy efficiency; and
( v ) Encouraging the use of renewable energy fuels for either Demand side management or the reduction of conventional fossil fuel use within the service territory.
( 2 ) Although not a goal, RUS recognizes that there will be a reduction of greenhouse gases with energy efficiency improvements.
[78 FR 73366, Dec. 5, 2013, as amended at 87 FR 73438, Nov. 30, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1564 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1564

To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to prohibit the Public Company 
   Accounting Oversight Board from requiring public companies to use 
    specific auditors or require the use of different auditors on a 
                            rotating basis.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2013

  Mr. Hurt (for himself and Mr. Meeks) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to prohibit the Public Company 
   Accounting Oversight Board from requiring public companies to use 
    specific auditors or require the use of different auditors on a 
                            rotating basis.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Audit Integrity and Job Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY RELATING TO AUDITORS.

    Section 103 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7213) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Limitation on Authority.--The Board shall have no authority 
under this title to require that audits conducted for a particular 
issuer in accordance with the standards set forth under this section be 
conducted by specific auditors, or that such audits be conducted for an 
issuer by different auditors on a rotating basis.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-58832, 333-58836, and 333-58840 of UTi Worldwide Inc. on Form S-8 of our
report dated April 6, 2001 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of IAS 10, revised
1999) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of UTi Worldwide Inc. for the
year ended January 31, 2001.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California

May 3, 2001
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Homassist Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ernest Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 14, 2006

/s/ Ernest CheungErnest Cheung, Chief Financial Officer
#### ROBERT COPPOLA *v.*RICHARD SIMONELLI ET AL.

(AC 23616)

Foti, Bishop and McLachlan, Js.

Submitted on briefs October 30

officially released December 2, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
1000.57184
FLECTRONIC RECORD

rnA#14-l3-00796-CR

STYl F: Luis Roberto Gonzalez v The State of Texas

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed.

nATF: October 30. 2014 Publish: No

OFFENSE: Aggravated Sexual Assault

COUNTY: Harris

TRIAL COURT: 176th District Court

TC CASE #:1344119

INTHE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS

STYl F: Luis Roberto Gonzalez v The State of Texas

CCA#

A?P£LLAMT*S Petition CCA Disposition:w*-m: I5SVI4

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: /9J~

JUDGE:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE: .

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit
15.1
  Patrizio
      & Zhao, LLCCertified
      Public Accountants and Consultants
                
                322
      Route 46 WestParsippany,
      NJ 07054Tel:  (973)
      882-8810Fax:
      (973) 882-0788www.pzcpa.com
 
 
 
 October
29, 2008
 
 U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
 Division
of Corporate Finance
 100 F.
Street, N.E.
 Washington,
D.C. 20549
 
 
 To Whom
It May Concern:
 
 We are
aware that JPAK Group, Inc. has included our report dated October 30, 2007,
(Except for Note 1, 14, 15, 16 and 17 as to which the date is October 29, 2008),
in its 10Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. We are also aware of our
responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.
 
 Yours
truly,
 
 
 /s/ Patrizio & Zhao,
LLC
 
 
 PATRIZIO
& ZHAO, LLC
 Certified
Public Accountants and Consultants
 
 Parsippany,
New Jersey
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Yijun Wang, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Jpak Group, Inc.;

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: May 23, 2008
#### McARDELL et al. v. OLCOTT et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 25, 1906.)

Action by Cornelius McArdell and others against Frederic P. Olcott and others.

No opinion. Motion granted upon conditions stated in memorandum per curiam. Settle order on notice.
EXHIBIT  (23)

INDEPENDENT  AUDITORS'  CONSENT  AND  REPORT  ON  SCHEDULES

The  Board  of  Directors
Harleysville  Group  Inc.:

     The  audits  referred  to in our report dated February 14, 2002 include the
related  financial  statement schedules as of December 31, 2001, and for each of
the  years  in  the  three-year  period ended December 31, 2001, included in the
annual  report  on  Form  10-K.  These  financial  statement  schedules  are the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion  on  these  financial  statement  schedules based on our audits.  In our
opinion,  such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all
material  respects,  the  information  set  forth  therein.

     We  consent  to  incorporation  by reference in the registration statements
(Nos.  333-03127,  33-84348,  33-43494, 33-91718, 33-91726, 33-43532, 333-85941,
333-37386,  333-37212)  on  Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 33-78372,
33-90810,  33-91720) on Form S-3 of Harleysville Group Inc. of our reports dated
February  14,  2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Harleysville
Group  Inc.  as  of  December  31,  2001  and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements  of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows and related financial
statement  schedules  for  each  of  the  years  in  the three-year period ended
December  31,  2001, which reports appear in the December 31, 2001 annual report
on  Form 10-K of Harleysville Group Inc., and of our report dated March 15, 2002
relating to the statements of financial condition of the Harleysville Group Inc.
Employee  Stock  Purchase Plan as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
statements  of  income  and  changes in plan equity for each of the years in the
three-year  period  ended  December  31,  2001,  which  report  appears  in  the
Harleysville Group Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan annual report on Form 11-K.


/s/  KPMG  LLP

Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania
March 22,  2002


<PAGE>
#### §§ 1726.1-1726.9 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i.) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 28, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii.) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Bertrand F. Cambou               
|                       |  |  |  | Bertrand F. Cambou                   
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1485.32 Program income.

Program income is gross income earned by the non-Federal entity that is directly generated by a supported activity or earned as a result of the Federal award during the period of performance. Any income generated from an activity, the expenditures for which have been wholly or partially reimbursed with MAP funds, shall be used by the MAP Participant in furtherance of its approved MAP activities in the program year during which the MAP funds are available for obligation by the MAP Participant, or must be returned to CCC. The use of such income shall be governed by this subpart. Interest earned on funds advanced by CCC is not program income. Reasonable activity fees or registration fees, if identified as such in a project budget, may be charged for approved activities. The intent to charge a fee must be part of the original proposal, along with an explanation of how such fees are to be used. Any activity fees charged must be used to offset activity expenses or returned to FAS. Such fees may not be used as profit or counted as contribution or cost share.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStatic and free-vibrational response of semi-circular graphite-epoxy frames with thin-walled open sectionsExperiments were conducted to measure the three-dimensional static and free vibrational response of two graphite-epoxy, thin-walled, open section frames. The frames are semi-circular with a radius of three feet, and one specimen has an I cross section and the other has a channel cross section. The flexibility influence coefficients were measured in static tests for loads applied at midspan with the ends of the specimens clamped. Natural frequencies and modes were determined from vibrational tests for free and clamped end conditions. The experimental data is used to evaluate a new finite element which was developed specifically for the analysis of curved, thin-walled structures. The formulation of the element is based on a Vlasov-type, thin-walled, curved beam theory. The predictions from the finite element program generally correlated well with the experimental data for the symmetric I-specimen. Discrepancies in some of the data were found to be due to flexibility in the clamped end conditions. With respect to the data for the channel specimen, the correlation was less satisfactory. The finite element analysis predicted the out-of-plane response of the channel specimen reasonably well, but large discrepancies occurred between the predicted in-plane response and the experimental data. The analysis predicted a much more compliant in-plane response than was observed in the experiments.Document ID19900004284Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCollins, J. Scott*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg, VA, United States)*Johnson, Eric R.*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1989Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberVPI-E-89-19CCMS-89-21NASA-CR-186097NAS 1.26:186097Accession Number90N13600Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-343Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004284.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Intellicell Biosciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Steven A. Victor, chief executive officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: April 17, 2012
By:
/s/ Steven A. VictorSteven A. Victor

Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 10.5
 ENCORE ACQUISITION COMPANY
FORM OF INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
  Optionee:Social Security Number:Address:Total Option Shares:Exercise Price Per Share:


$Date of Grant:Expiration Date for Exercise of Options:
 Grant of Option
 Exercise of Option
 Vesting.
  (i)
    
    1/3 of the total Shares subject to this Option
shall vest and be exercisable by Optionee 12 months after the Date of
Grant;(ii)
    
    Another 1/3 of the total Shares subject to this
Option shall vest and be exercisable by Optionee 24 months after the
Date of Grant; and




---



##### 



(iii)
    
    The final 1/3 of the total Shares subject to
this Option shall vest and be exercisable by Optionee 36 months after
the Date of Grant.
    Method of Exercise
  Method of Payment
   -2-




---



##### 



Termination of Status as an Employee
  Disability of Optionee
 Death of Optionee
    Non-Transferability of Option
 -3-




---



##### 



Term of Option
 Severability; Construction
 Damages
 Governing Law
 Delay
 Incorporation of Plan; Complete Agreement
 Privileges of Stock Ownership
 Notices
 No Right to Employment or Continued Vesting
 -4-




---



##### 



-5-




---



##### 



Date:
    
    _____________________________
 THE COMPANY
  By:
    
    _____________________________Name:
    
    _____________________________Title:
    
    _____________________________
 OPTIONEE
 __________________________________________________________
 Consent of Spouse
 Signature of Spouse:
    
    _______________________________Printed or Typed Name:
    
    _______________________________Address:
    
    ___________________________________________________________________________________
 -6-