alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification Pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, William N. Fry, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Riddell BellHoldings, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluations; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: November 15, 2005 /s/ William N. Fry         William N. Fry    President, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer ofAffinity Group Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify as follows:

 

1.     This statement is providedpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2009 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.     The Periodic Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.     The information contained inthe Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of dates and for theperiods indicated therein.

 

 

Date:  November 12, 2009

 

 
|   | /s/ Michael A. Schneider              |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Michael A. Schneider                  |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity GroupHolding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

1

----
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1430.226 Violations regarding controlled substances.

The provisions of § 718.11 of this title apply to this part.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the quarterly report of Midnight Candle Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Helen
C. Cary, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and I, Patrick Deparini, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Helen C.
Cary


Helen
C. Cary


Chief
Executive Officer


November
14, 2008





/s/Patrick
Deparini


Patrick
Deparini


Chief
Financial Officer


November
14, 2008
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Fred Williams, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 31, 1966, reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to the court below for a hearing on the issue presented and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. No questions of fact have been considered. Appellant’s allegation that he was without counsel at the time of sentencing, if proved, would entitled him to *coram nobis*relief *(People*v. *Sykes,*23 A D 2d 701). He is entitled to a hearing on that allegation unless it is conclusively refuted by unquestionable documentary proof *(People*v. *Pearson,*12 N Y 2d 978, 979; *People*v. *Picciotti,*4 N Y 2d 340, 345; *People*v. *Winslow,*24 A D 2d 761). In our opinion, the notation in the docket book, without more, is not such proof (cf. *People*v. *Lombard,*21 A D 2d 648, 649; *People*v. *Salters,*20 A D 2d 731; *People*v. *Conklin,*19 A D 2d 536; *People*v. *Page,*12 A D 2d 984). Ughetta, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J., and Munder, J., dissent and vote to affirm the order, with the following memorandum: Defendant did not make this application until after he learned the minutes of sentence were unavailable. His bare allegation of nonrepresentation is in our opinion conclusively rebutted by the docket book entry upon sentencing, “Atty. Norman B. Johnson present with defendant”, particularly in view of the fact that he submits no statement from this attorney to weaken the force of the entry as to representation (cf. *People*v, *Scott,*10 N Y 2d 380; *People*v. *Vellucci,*13 N Y 2d 665).
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, R. Allen Smith, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of NBOG
Bancorporation, Inc. (the "Registrant");

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the Registrant
and have:

          a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
this report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

     5.  I have disclosed, base on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

          a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
controls.

Date:  March 30, 2007                     /s/ R. Allen Smith
                                          ------------------
                                          R. Allen Smith
                                          Principal Executive Officer
§ 15b.26 Nonacademic services. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Recipients to which this subpart applies shall provide nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities in such a manner as is necessary to afford handicapped students an equal opportunity for participation in such services and activities.
( 2 ) Nonacademic and extracurricular services and activities may include counseling services, physical education and athletics, food services, transportation, health services, recreational activities, special interest groups or clubs sponsored by the recipient, referrals to agencies which provide assistance to handicapped persons, and assistance in obtaining outside employment.
( b ) *Counseling services.* A recipient to which this subpart applies that provides personal, academic, or vocational counseling, guidance, or placement services to its students shall provide these services without discrimination on the basis of handicap. The recipient shall ensure that qualified handicapped students are not counseled toward more restrictive career objectives than are nonhandicapped students with similar interests and abilities.
( c ) *Physical education and athletics.* ( 1 ) In providing physical education courses and athletics and similar aid, benefits, and services to any of its students, a recipient to which this subpart applies may not discriminate on the basis of handicap. A recipient that offers physical education courses or that operates or sponsors interscholastic, club, or intramural athletics shall provide to qualified handicapped students an equal opportunity for participation.
( 2 ) A recipient may offer handicapped students physical education and athletic activities that are separate or different from those offered to nonhandicapped students only if separation or differentiation is consistent with requirements of § 15b.23, and only if no qualified handicapped student is denied the opportunity to compete for teams or to participate in courses that are not separate or different.
( d ) *Food services.* In providing food services to any of its students, a recipient to which this subpart applies may not discriminate on the basis of handicap. ( 1 ) Recipients shall serve special meals, at no extra charge, to students whose handicap restricts their diet. Recipients may require students to provide medical certification that special meals are needed because of their handicap.
( 2 ) Where existing food service facilities are not completely accessible and usable, recipients may provide aides or use other equally effective methods to serve food to handicapped persons. Recipients shall provide all food services in the most intergrated setting appropriate to the needs of handicapped persons as required by § 15b.23(b).
[47 FR 25470, June 11, 1982, as amended at 68 FR 51343, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### In re KAFFENBURGH.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

In the matter of Abraham H. Ka~enburgh.

No opinion. Ordered that respondent file answer in 20 days.
Exhibit
32.1





PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the quarterly report
of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC")
on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sophocles Zoullas, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date:
May 7, 2009





/s/
Sophocles
Zoullas


Sophocles
Zoullas


Principal
Executive Officer
Motion to Reinstate Granted; Memorandum Opinion issued June 5, 2014,

Wi thdrawn; Appeal Reinstated; Order filed July 15, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00280

- CV

____________ LEROY STROMAN , Appellant

V.
ROBERT RUSSEL L TAUTENHAHN , INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT L. WRIGHT, DECEASED , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 and Probate Court

Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CI48098



### ORDER
On February 20, 2014, the trial co urt sig ned an order granting appellee’s

non

- suit in a de novo appeal from justice court

. Appellant Stroman then filed a motion for attorney’s fees. Stroman also filed a motion to reconsider the granting
of the non

- suit. On March 17, 2014, the trial court signed a n order denyingStroman’s motion for reconsideration. Stroman filed his notice of appeal on April

4, 2014. The clerk’s record was filed on April 17, 2014. The clerk’s record contains no affidavit of indigence or evidence that Stroman has established that h e is entitled to proceed without the advance payment of costs on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(a) (listing requirements for establishing indigence).
On May 8, 2014 , this court ordered Stroman to pay the appellate filing fee
on or before May 23, 2014 , or the appeal would be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of appeal where appellant fail s to comply
with court order)

. Stroman did not pay the appellate filing fee or file any response to this court’s order. Therefore, on June 5, 2014, this court dismissed the appeal.
On June 11, 2014, Stroman filed a motion to reinstate the appeal, asserting that his counsel did not receive notice of the intent to dismiss. In addition, Stroman asserts that he is entitled to proceed without the advance payment of costs. On June 20, 2014, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing Stroman ’s affidavit of indigence for appeal. No contest to the affidavit was filed within the deadline prescribed in the appellate rules. See Tex. R. App. P . 20.1(e). Accordingly,
Stroman is entitled to proceed without the advance payment of costs. See id. 20.1(f).
Appellee filed a response in opposition to appellant’s motion to reinstate asserting that Stroman ’s affidavit of indigence was not filed timely

. T he Texas Supreme Court has held that late

- filed affidavits of indigence are effective. See Sprowl v. Payne , 236 S.W.3d 786, 787 (Tex. 2007) (per curiam). An affidavit of indigence may be filed or amended after the time specified for its filing in Rule
20. 1 because an affidavit of indigence is no longer a jurisdictional requirement. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b); In re J.W., 52 S.W.3d 730, 733 (Tex. 2001).Accordingly, we GRANT Stroman ’s motion to reinstate the appeal . We

WITHDRAW our Memorandum Opinion issue d June 5, 2014, and VACATE the judgment issued that date. We order the appeal REINSTATED.

We ORDER Stroman to file his appellant’s brief on or before August 15,
2014.

PER CURIAM
§ 1720.6 Application process. ( a ) Applications shall contain the following: ( 1 ) Background and contact information on the applicant;
( 2 ) A term sheet summarizing the proposed terms and conditions of, and the security pledged to assure the applicant's performance under, the guarantee agreement;
( 3 ) A statement by the applicant as to how it proposes to use the proceeds of the guaranteed bonds, and the financial benefit it anticipates deriving from participating in the program;
( 4 ) A pro-forma financial statement and cash flow projection or business plan including detailed assumptions for the next five years, demonstrating that there is reasonable assurance that the applicant will be able to repay the guaranteed bonds in accordance with their terms;
( 5 ) Consolidated financial statements of the guaranteed lender for the previous three years that have been audited by an independent certified public accountant, including any associated notes, as well as any interim financial statements and associated notes for the current fiscal year;
( 6 ) Evidence of having been assigned an investment grade rating on the debt obligations for which it is seeking the guarantee, without regard to the guarantee or such other evidence of creditworthiness as required by the Administrator under § 1720.5(b)(2);
( 7 ) Evidence of a credit rating, from a rating agency, on its senior secured debt, its corporate credit rating, or such other evidence of creditworthiness as required by the Administrator under § 1720.5(b)(2); and
( 8 ) Such other application documents and submissions deemed necessary by the Secretary for the evaluation of applicants.
( b ) The application process occurs as follows: ( 1 ) The applicant submits an application to the Secretary;
( 2 ) The application is screened by RUS pursuant to 7 CFR 1720.7(a) of this part, to ascertain its threshold eligibility for the program;
( 3 ) RUS evaluates the application pursuant to the selection criteria set forth in 7 CFR 1720.7(b) of this part;
( 4 ) If RUS provisionally approves the application, the applicant and RUS negotiate terms and conditions of the bond documents, and
( 5 ) The applicant offers its guaranteed bonds, and the Secretary upon approval of the pricing, redemption provisions and other terms of the offering, executes the guarantee.
( c ) If requested by the applicant at the time it files its application, the General Counsel of the Department of Agriculture shall provide the Secretary with an opinion regarding the validity and authority of a guarantee issued to the lender under section 313A of the RE Act.
[69 FR 63049, Oct. 29, 2004, as amended at 75 FR 42574, July 22, 2010; 87 FR 74500, Dec. 6, 2022]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Investment Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2012 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 29, 2012



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David Gladstone                                           
|David Gladstone                                               
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
120 STAT. 292 PUBLIC LAW 109–184—MAR. 20, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1287:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): Dec. 18, considered and passed House.

Vol. 152 (2006): Mar. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–184

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 312 East

North Avenue in Flora, Illinois, as the ‘‘Robert T. Ferguson Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

312 East North Avenue in Flora, Illinois, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Robert T. Ferguson Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert

T. Ferguson Post Office Building’’.

Approved March 20, 2006.

Mar. 20, 2006

[H.R. 1287]
# Support Documents for

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on

Premanufacture Notice (PMN)

P-06-742

EPA Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPPT -2011-0577

# Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for

PMN P-06-742

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for

PMN P-06-742

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for

PMN P-06-742

# A-001

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-06-742

# A-002

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-06-742

# A-003

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P-06-742