Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Notices 13399 

development on Federal and Indian 

lands and the Outer Continental Shelf 

(OCS). Under various laws, the 

Secretary’s responsibilities include 

maintaining a comprehensive 

inspection, collection, and fiscal and 

production accounting and auditing 

system that provides the capability to: 

(1) Accurately determine mineral 

royalties, interest, and other payments 

owed, (2) collect and account for such 

amounts in a timely manner, and (3) 

disburse the funds collected. ONRR 

performs these mineral revenue 

management functions for the Secretary. 

Laws pertaining to mineral leases on 

Federal and Indian lands are posted at 

http://www.onrr.gov/Laws_R_D/ 

PubLaws/default.htm. 

(a) General Information: ONRR 

collects, audits, and disburses royalties, 

interest, and other payments owed by 

lessees on minerals produced from 

Federal and Indian lands. If a lessee 

overpays the amount due on minerals 

produced from Federal lands, it may 

request a refund from ONRR. If a lessee 

overpays the amount due on minerals 

produced from tribal lands, it may, with 

the tribe’s permission, recoup the 

overpayment against other royalties or 

other revenues owed in that month 

under other leases for which that tribe 

is the lessor. If a lessee fails to pay or 

underpays an amount it owes on 

Federal or Indian mineral production, it 

generally must pay interest on the 

underpayment from the date the 

payment was due. For royalties and 

other amounts owed on oil and gas 

produced from Federal lands, the 

Federal Oil and Gas Royalty 

Management Act (FOGRMA, 30 U.S.C. 

1701 et seq.) permits a lessee to 

designate a designee for its payment 

obligations. 

(b) Information Collections: This ICR 

covers certain information required 

pursuant to FOGRMA and 30 CFR 1218 

for (1) cross-lease netting in the 

calculation of late-payment interest; (2) 

a lessee’s designation of designee for 

payment obligations; (3) tribal 

permission for recoupment on Indian oil 

and gas leases; and (4) refund requests 

for overpayments made to ONRR. 

(1) Cross-Lease Netting in the 

Calculation of Late-Payment Interest: 

Pursuant to 30 CFR 1218.42(b), if certain 

conditions are met, ‘‘[r]oyalties 

attributed to production from a lease or 

leases which should have been 

attributed to production from a different 

lease or leases may be offset to 

determine whether and to what extent 

an underpayment exists on which 

interest is due . . . .’’ ONRR calls this 

process cross-lease netting. To 

determine whether a lessee is entitled to 

cross-lease netting, ONRR must collect 

lease, production, payor, recipient, and 

other information specified in 30 CFR 

1218.42(b). This information is 

necessary for ONRR to calculate the 

correct interest amount. 

(2) Designation of Designee for 

Payment Obligations: FOGRMA allows a 

lessee to notify the Secretary in writing 

of its designation of ‘‘a person to make 

all or part of the payments due under a 

lease on the lessee’s behalf . . . in 

which event said designated person 

may, in its own name, pay, offset or 

credit monies, make adjustments, 

request and receive refunds and submit 

reports with respect to payments 

required by the lessee.’’ See 30 U.S.C. 

1712(a). ONRR created form ONRR– 

4425, Designation Form for Royalty 

Payment Responsibility, for lessees to 

notify it of such designation. ONRR 

requires the information required in this 

form to ensure proper mineral revenue 

collection. 

(3) Tribal Permission for Recoupment 

on Indian Oil and Gas Leases: Pursuant 

to 30 CFR 1218.53(b), a payor may, with 

written permission authorized by tribal 

statute or resolution, recoup an 

overpayment against royalties or other 

revenues owed under other leases for 

which that tribe is the lessor. See 30 

CFR 1218.53(b). The payor must provide 

ONRR with a copy of the tribe’s written 

permission. Id. 

(4) Processing Refund Requests: 

FORGMA authorizes a Federal oil and 

gas lessee to request a refund for an 

overpayment in certain situations. See 

30 U.S.C. 1721a(b). The lessee must 

supply information to support its refund 

request. Id. ONRR collects banking 

information from the refund recipient in 

order to disburse the overpaid amount 

to the correct account. 

Title: Collection of Monies Due to the 

Federal Government; and Processing 

Refund Requests Related to 

Overpayments Made to ONRR. 

OMB Control Number: 1012–0008. 

Bureau Form Number: Form ONRR– 

4425. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents/Affected Public: Federal 

and Indian lessees. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Respondents: 170. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 170. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Burden Hours: 93 hours. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Frequency of Collection: On occasion. 

Total Estimated Annual Non-hour 

Burden Cost: ONRR did not identify any 

‘‘non-hour cost’’ burden associated with 

this collection of information. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

The authority for this action is the 

PRA. 

Kimbra G. Davis, 

Director for Office of Natural Resources 

Revenue. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04684 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4335–30–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1253] 

Certain LTE-Compliant Cellular 

Communication Devices; Notice of 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

February 1, 2021, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Evolved Wireless, LLC of 

Austin, Texas. Supplements to the 

complaint were filed on February 22 

and 23, 2021. The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain LTE-compliant cellular 

communication devices by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. RE46,679 (‘‘the ’679 Patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. RE48,326 (‘‘the ’326 

Patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 10,517,120 

(‘‘the ’120 Patent’’). The complaint 

further alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by the 

applicable Federal Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
13400 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Notices 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2 86 FR 5136 (January 19, 2021). 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

March 2, 2021, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 6 

and 8 of the ’679 patent; claims 18–20 

of the ’326 patent; claims 12 and 16–18 

of the ’120 patent; and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘LTE-compliant 

cellular phones, tablets, and 

smartwatches’’; 

(3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(l), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding administrative law judge shall 

take evidence or other information and 

hear arguments from the parties or other 

interested persons with respect to the 

public interest in this investigation, as 

appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors set forth 

in 19 U.S.C. l337(d)(l), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(4) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Evolved 

Wireless, LLC, 900 S Capital of Texas 

Highway, Suite 150, Austin, TX 78746. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 129, 

Samseong-Ro, Yoeongtong-Gu, 

Suwon-Si, Gyeonngi-Do 16677, 

Republic of Korea 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 85 

Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ 

07660–2118 

Motorola Mobility LLC, 222 W 

Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800, 

Chicago, Illinois 60654 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(5) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: March 2, 2021. 

By order of the Commission. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04651 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1472 (Final)] 

Difluoromethane (R–32) From China 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigation, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), 

that an industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of imports 

of difluoromethane (R–32) from China, 

provided for in subheadings 2903.39.20 

and 3824.78.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States, that have 

been found by the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in 

the United States at less than fair value 

(‘‘LTFV’’).2

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

investigation effective January 23, 2020, 

following receipt of a petition filed with 

the Commission and Commerce by 

Arkema, Inc., King of Prussia, 

Pennsylvania. The Commission 

scheduled the final phase of the 

investigation following notification of a 

preliminary determination by 

Commerce that imports of R–32 from 

China were being sold at LTFV within 

the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act 

(19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the 

scheduling of the final phase of the 

Commission’s investigation and of a 

public hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register of September 9, 2020 (85 FR 

55688). Subsequently, the Commission 

cancelled its previously scheduled 

hearing following the withdrawal of 

petitioners’ request to appear at the 

hearing (86 FR 6670, January 22, 2021). 

The Commission made this 

determination pursuant to § 735(b) of 

the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It 

completed and filed its determination in 

this investigation on March 2, 2021. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 5165 (March 

2021), entitled Difluoromethane (R–32) 

from China: Investigation No. 731–TA– 

1472 (Final). 

By order of the Commission. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES