alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Placement Stability      

# Resource: Placement Stability

This factsheet (PDF, 2 pages) helps child welfare leaders, managers, data and continuous quality improvement (CQI) staff, and others understand and explain the Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) statewide data indicator placement stability. This indicator measures whether children who were removed from their homes experience stability in their placement setting while they are in foster care. **Learn more.**
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1430.419 Misrepresentation and scheme or device. ( a ) In addition to other penalties, sanctions or remedies as may apply, all or any part of a payment otherwise due a person or legal entity on all participating dairy operations in which the person or legal entity has an interest may be withheld or be required to be refunded if the person or legal entity fails to comply with the provisions of this subpart or adopts or participates in adopting a scheme or device designed to evade this subpart, or that has the effect of evading this part. Such acts may include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Concealing information that affects a registration or coverage election;
( 2 ) Submitting false or erroneous information; or
( 3 ) Creating a business arrangement using rental agreements or other arrangements to conceal the interest of a person or legal entity in a dairy operation for the purpose of obtaining DMC payments the individual or legal entity would otherwise not be eligible to receive. Indicators of such business arrangement include, but are not limited to the following: ( i ) No milk is produced and commercially marketed by a participating dairy operation;
( ii ) The participating dairy operation has no appreciable assets;
( iii ) The only source of capital for the dairy operation is the DMC payments; or
( iv ) The represented dairy operation exists mainly for the receipt of DMC payments.
( b ) If the Deputy Administrator determines that a person or legal entity has adopted a scheme or device to evade, or that has the purpose of evading, the provisions of this subpart, such person or legal entity will be ineligible to receive DMC payments in the year such scheme or device was adopted and the succeeding year.
( c ) A person or legal entity that perpetuates a fraud, commits fraud, or participates in equally serious actions for the benefit of the person or legal entity, or the benefit of any other person or legal entity, in violation of the requirements of this subpart will be subject to a 5-year denial of all DMC Program benefits. Such other equally serious actions may include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Knowingly engaging in, or aiding in the creation of a fraudulent document or statement;
( 2 ) Failing to disclose material information relevant to the administration of the provisions of this subpart, or
( 3 ) Engaging in any other actions of a person or legal entity determined by the Deputy Administrator to be designed, or intended to, circumvent the provisions of this subpart.
( d ) Program payments and benefits will be denied on pro-rata basis: ( 1 ) In accordance with the interest held by the person or legal entity in any other legal entity or joint operations; and
( 2 ) To any person or legal entity that is a cash rent tenant on land owned or under control of a person or legal entity for which a determination of this section has been made.
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-1698

___________ Cletus J. Stratman; Judith E. Stratman, * * Appellants, * * v. * Appeal from the Unite d States * District Court for the Linze Brockmeyer, individually and * Eastern District of Missouri. doing business as Logcrafters Log * and Timber Homes, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: October 14, 199 7 Fi led: October 30, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In this diversity co ntract action, Cletus and Judith Stra tman--husband and wife--appeal the district court & s 1 grant of judgment as a matter of law to Linze Brockmeyer, indi viduallyand d/b/a Logcrafters Log and Timber Home s (collectiv ely Logcrafters), following a jury trial. The St ratmans also appeal the district court & s exclusion o f-2-

certain-3-

expert testimony as a discovery sanction. We affirm.
T h is dispute arose out of the Stratmans & purchase of a re ady-to-assemble log home from Logcrafters. Th e Stratmans alleged a breach of contract and a violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMP A), Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 407.010-407.130 (1994 & Supp. 1996). Aft er de novo review, see Sip-Top, Inc. v. Ekc o Group , Inc. , 86 F.3d 827, 830 (8th Cir. 1996), we agre e that the S tratmans failed to present evidence from which a ju ry could conclude that Logcrafters breached th e parti es & contract. We also agree that the Stratman s fail edto make a submissible case that Logcrafter s vi olatedthe MMPA. See Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 407.020 , 407.0 25 (1994 & Supp. 1996). We find no abuse o f di scretionin the district court & s limitation of th e testimony of Stratmans & expert witness, as his report was supp liedshortly before trial and did not comport wit h the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26
. See Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. , 47 F.3 d 277, 284 ( 8th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 84 (1995). Logcrafters & motion to dismiss this appeal is denied, and the judgment of the district court is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.-4-
---

EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934








I, Mike Sawtell, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this amendment to quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of DigitalPost Interactive, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




Dated: June 28, 2010








/s/ Mike Sawtell


----------------


Mike Sawtell


Chief Executive Officer
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/ssi/spotlights/spot-prerelease.htm**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/ssi/spotlights/spot-prerelease.htm**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 157 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 157

 To authorize a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, West 
   Onslow Beach and New River Inlet (Topsail Beach), North Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2013

 Mr. McIntyre introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, West 
   Onslow Beach and New River Inlet (Topsail Beach), North Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WEST ONSLOW BEACH AND NEW RIVER INLET (TOPSAIL BEACH), NORTH 
              CAROLINA.

    The Secretary of the Army is authorized to carry out a project for 
hurricane and storm damage reduction, West Onslow Beach and New River 
Inlet (Topsail Beach), North Carolina, substantially in accordance with 
the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in the West Onslow 
Beach and New River Inlet (Topsail Beach), North Carolina: Report of 
the Chief of Engineers, dated September 28, 2009, at a total cost of 
$47,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $30,000,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $17,000,000, and at an estimated total 
cost of $252,000,000 for periodic beach nourishment and monitoring over 
the 50-year economic life of the project, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $125,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $127,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of William Cassell, Petitioner, v. James E. Allen, Jr., as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Proceeding under article 78 of the CPDR to review a determination of the Board of Regents which revoked petitioner’s license to practice pharmacy. Petitioner was charged pursuant to the pertinent statute (Education Law, § 6804, subd. 1, par. i) with willful and repeated violations of the Education Law relating to pharmacy. He was, upon adequate evidence, found guilty of each of many charges, including his stocking misbranded antibiotics and other drugs, for which a penalty of $1,000 had been assessed against him; the sale of drugs without a prescription, for which a penalty of $100 had been imposed; his authorization of a sale by his employee of a drug without a prescription; a number of sales by the same employee of drugs without prescription, of sales of narcotics and barbiturates without prescriptions and in unlabeled and misbranded containers and without making any record of their disposition; and stocking outdated and misbranded drugs. Under a second specification, he was properly found guilty of false statements in his application for registration of his pharmacy (Education Law, § 6804, subd. 1, par. a) in which he failed to disclose a criminal conviction of selling barbiturate drugs without a prescription. To the extent that certain of the administrative findings depended on the testimony of investigators, it was, of course, within the province of the subcommittee to accept that evidence and to deny credence to the contradictory testimony of petitioner and his employee, as the subcommittee explicitly did. Petitioner’s contention that, although he was the owner and supervising pharmacist, he should not be penalized for the acts of his employee to whom he entrusted complete charge of the pharmacy is without merit (see Education Law, § 6805, subds. 2, 3-a) and, indeed, upon the hearing he conceded his responsibility. We find no basis for petitioner’s contention that the Board of Regents acted arbitrarily or unreasonbly in imposing as punishment the revocation of his license and in thus declining to follow the recommendation of the State Board of Pharmacy that the license be suspended merely; and we find no warrant for any action on our part to modify the punishment thus imposed. Determination confirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Leon Shapiro, Respondent.

Order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated May 16, 1966, reversed, on the law; demurrer disallowed; and indictment reinstated. In our opinion, the indictment was sufficient to withstand a demurrer (cf. *People*v. *Major,*13 N Y 2d 796). The allegations of the indictment must be accepted as true when challenged by demurrer *(People*v. *Post Std. Co.,*18 A D 2d 302, revd. on other grounds 13 N Y 2d 185). So treated, the facts stated in the indictment are sufficient to constitute the crimes charged. Further particulars concerning the alleged crimes are a matter of evidence and need not be set forth in the indictment *(People*v. *Longo,*16 A D 2d 297, 299). If respondent desires additional information as to the precise nature of the charges, he has the right to obtain a bill of particulars *(People*v. *Dabek,*18 A D 2d 773). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
§ 1219.32 Initial nomination and appointment of importer members and alternates. ( a ) The Department will conduct the nomination process for the initial importer members and alternates on the Board in accordance with the following procedures. ( 1 ) The Department shall notify all known importers and importer organizations that they may nominate persons to serve as importer members and alternates on the Board.
( 2 ) After names are received from the importers and importer organizations, the Department shall prepare a ballot with the names of all persons nominated and mail it to all known importers to allow them the opportunity to vote for the persons who will represent their interests on the Board.
( 3 ) After tabulating the vote, the Department shall announce the results and submit two names for each importer member and two names for each alternate importer member to the Secretary from the persons receiving the highest number of votes.
( b ) The Secretary shall select the importer members and alternates of the Board from the nominees elected by importers. Following the selection of the importer members, the Secretary shall select the alternate importer members. In selecting the alternate members, the Secretary shall consider the names for each alternate member position along with the individuals who were elected by importers for each Board member position but were not selected for that position.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEOS Aqua AMSR-E Sea Ice Validation Program: Meltpond 2000 Flight ReportThis flight report describes the field component of Meltpond2000, the first in a series of Arctic and Antarctic aircraft campaigns planned as part of NASA's Earth Observing System Aqua sea ice validation program for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E). This prelaunch Arctic field campaign was carried out between June 25 and July 6, 2000 from Thule, Greenland, with the objective of quantifying the errors incurred by the AMSR-E sea ice algorithms resulting from the presence of melt ponds. A secondary objective of the mission was to develop a microwave capability to discriminate between melt ponds and seawater using low-frequency microwave radiometers. Meltpond2000 was a multiagency effort involving personnel from the Navy, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and NASA. The field component of the mission consisted of making five eight-hour flights from Thule Air Base with a Naval Air Warfare Center P-3 aircraft over portions of Baffin Bay and the Canadian Arctic. The aircraft sensors were provided and operated by the Microwave Radiometry Group of NOAA's Environmental Technology Laboratory. A Navy ice observer from the National Ice Center provided visual documentation of surface ice conditions during each of the flights. Two of the five flights were coordinated with Canadian scientists making surface measurements of melt ponds at an ice camp located near Resolute Bay, Canada. Coordination with the Canadians will provide additional information on surface characteristics and will be of great value in the interpretation of the aircraft and high-resolution satellite data sets.Document ID20020013322Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCavalieri, Donald J.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 20, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 2000Subject CategoryOceanographyReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2000-209972Rept-2001-00672-0NAS 1.15:209972Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 971-00-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020013322.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Data Call Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Larry Mosley, CFO and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Larry Mosley

Larry MosleyCFO and DirectorDated: May 12, 2011

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Data Call Technologies, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
#### Charlotte Brody *v.*Vera Dunnigan

The motion by the defendant for review of the action of the Circuit Court in the fourteenth circuit dismissing her appeal and terminating a stay of *603execution for her failure to post an appellate bond is denied in the absence of a finding. See Practice Book § 694.

*Sydney T. Schulman,*in support of the motion.

Submitted October 21

decided October 27, 1971
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1704 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1704

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
       for start-up expenditures for business for 2013 and 2014.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2013

Mr. Braley of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
       for start-up expenditures for business for 2013 and 2014.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Support Our Startups Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR START-UP EXPENDITURES FOR 2013 AND 
              2014.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 195(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2010'' in the matter preceding 
        subparagraph (A) and inserting ``2010, 2013, or 2014'', and
            (2) by striking ``2010'' in the heading and inserting 
        ``2010, 2013, or 2014''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.
                                 <all>
```