alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the:

(i)  Registration Statement No. 33-29287 on Form S-8 and related Prospectus with
     respect to the 1989 Long Term Performance  Incentive Plan of NL Industries,
     Inc.; and

(ii) Registration Statement No. 33-25913 on Form S-8 and related Prospectus with
     respect to the NL Industries, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan; and

(iii)Registration  Statement  No.  333-65817 on Form S-8 and related  Prospectus
     with respect to the NL Industries, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and

(iv) Registration Statement No. 33-48145 on Form S-8 and related Prospectus with
     respect to the NL Industries, Inc. 1992 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
     Plan.

of our  report  dated  February  12,  2003  on our  audits  of the  consolidated
financial  statements and financial statement  schedules of NL Industries,  Inc.
("NL") as of December 31, 2002 and 2001,  and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2002, which report is included in this Amendment No. 2
to NL's Industries, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K.





                                    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Houston, Texas
October 31, 2003
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA planar reacting shear layer system for the study of fluid dynamics-combustion interactionA versatile planar reacting shear layer facility is constructed at NASA-Lewis. The research objectives, as well as design, instrumentations and the operational procedures developed for the system are described. The fundamental governing equations and the type of quantitative information that are needed from experiments are described. Additionally, a review of earlier work is presented. Whenever appropriate, comparisons are made with similar systems in other facilities and the main differences are described. Finally, the nonintrusive measurement techniques (PLIF, PMS, LDV, and Schlieren photography) and the type of experiments that are planned are described.Document ID19900004077Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsMarek, C. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Chang, C. T.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Ghorashi, B.*(Cleveland State Univ. OH., United States)*Wey, C. C.*(Cleveland State Univ. OH., United States)*Wey, C.*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc., Cleveland OH., United States)*Mularz, E. J.*(Army Aviation Research and Development Command Cleveland, OH., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102422AVSCOM-TR-89-C-013E-5063NAS 1.15:102422AD-A233938Meeting InformationMeeting: International Symposium on CombustionLocation: OrleansCountry: FranceStart Date: July 22, 1990End Date: July 27, 1990Sponsors:Orleans Univ.Accession Number90N13393Funding Number(s)PROJECT: DA PROJ. 1L1-61102-AH-45PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004077.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        1,606
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        104
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             255
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                             0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,116
<COMMON>                                           120
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                638
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                     758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                6
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               521
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                           30
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       26
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                     775
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    2,116
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                          834
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                34
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         720
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         754
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             80
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   9
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      89
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            24
<NET-INCOME>                                        65
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       65
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            35
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           20
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             419
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.34
        


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1675 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit health plans without 

a deductible for prenatal, labor and delivery, and postpartum care to 

be treated as high deductible plans with respect to health savings accounts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2013 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. HECK of Nevada, Mr. HARRIS, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. TERRY, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. 

BROUN of Georgia, Mr. LANCE, and Mr. DESJARLAIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

health plans without a deductible for prenatal, labor and 

delivery, and postpartum care to be treated as high deductible plans with respect to health savings accounts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Women’s Ac5 cess to Free-Market Healthcare Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1675 IH

1 SEC. 2. HSA HIGH DEDUCTIBLE PLAN SAFE HARBOR FOR 

2 ABSENCE OF PRENATAL, LABOR AND DELIV3 ERY, AND POSTPARTUM CARE DEDUCTIBLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 223(c) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by re6 designating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (E) and 

7 by inserting after subparagraph (C) the following new sub8 paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(D) SAFE HARBOR FOR ABSENCE OF PRE10 NATAL, LABOR AND DELIVERY, AND

11 POSTPARTUM CARE DEDUCTIBLE.— 

12 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—A plan shall not 

13 fail to be treated as a high deductible 

14 health plan by reason of failing to have a 

15 deductible for prenatal, labor and delivery, 

16 and postpartum care. 

17 ‘‘(ii) PRENATAL, LABOR AND DELIV18 ERY, AND POSTPARTUM.—The Secretary, 

19 in consultation with the American Acad20 emy of Pediatrics and American College of 

21 Obstetricians and Gynecologists, shall by 

22 regulation define prenatal, labor and deliv23 ery, and postpartum care for purposes of 

24 this subparagraph.’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1675 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of Heritage FinancialGroup (the “Company”) that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany as of the dates and periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.        Date: November 14, 2007 By:  /s/ O. Leonard Dorminey    O. Leonard Dorminey    President and Chief Executive Officer           Date: November 14, 2007 By:  /s/ T. Heath Fountain    T. Heath Fountain    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 1540.41 Definitions. ( a ) *Perishable product* means: ( 1 ) Live plants and fresh cut flowers provided for in chapter 6 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS);
( 2 ) Fresh or chilled vegetables provided in heading 0701 through 0709 (except subheading 0709.52.00) and heading 0714 of the HTS;
( 3 ) Fresh fruit provided for in subheadings 0804.20 through 0810.90 (except citrons of subheadings 0805.90.00, tamarinds and kiwi fruit of subheading 0810.90.20, and cashew apples, mameyes colorados, sapodillas, soursops and sweetsops of subheading 0810.90.40) of the HTS; or
( 4 ) Concentrated citrus fruit juice provided for in subheadings 2009.11.00, 2009.19.40, 2009.20.40, 2009.30.20, and 2009.30.60 of the HTS.
( b ) *Beneficiary country* means any country listed in subsection 203(b)(1) of the Act with respect to which there is in effect a proclamation by the President designating such country as a beneficiary country for purposes of the Act.
#### Herman Katz et al., Respondents, v. L. H. Martin Value Centers-Rego Park, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both dated November 30, 1966, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements, payable jointly by the separately appearing defendants. The record presents triable issues of fact. Beldoek, P. J., TJghetta, Brennan, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ForgeHouse, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Britchford-Steel,
      Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, and I, Jorge Vargas, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





i.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to ForgeHouse, Inc. and will be retained
      by
      ForgeHouse, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.





**/S/*****JOHN
                BRITCHFORD-STEEL*****JOHN
                BRITCHFORD-STEEL****CHIEF
                EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR****FORGEHOUSE,
                INC.****AUGUST
                14, 2008**





**/S/*****JORGE
                VARGAS*****JORGE
                VARGAS****CHIEF
                FINANCIAL OFFICER****FORGEHOUSE,
                INC.****AUGUST
                14, 2008**
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00476

- CR

MICHAEL PAUL PARKINS ON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
Appeal from the 239th District Court of Brazoria County. (Tr. Ct. No. 72075 ).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on June 13, 2014. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reve rsible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered June 11, 2015

.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Massengale. Op inion delivered by Justice Higley.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40410

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR OROPEZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Consolidated with No. 09-40411

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR ABRAHAM OROPEZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:07-CR-658-1

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 18, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-40410 c/w 09-40411

2

Oscar Oropeza has appealed his convictions on two counts of participation

in drug conspiracies and the five-year term of supervised release imposed for his

money laundering conspiracy conviction. Oropeza argued that his convictions

for the two drug conspiracy counts violated the Double Jeopardy Clause.

However, Oropeza has withdrawn this argument and advised the court that we

need not review this issue. Thus, Oropeza has waived this argument. See

United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 733 (1993).

Oropeza argues that the five-year term of supervised release imposed for

his conviction under Count Two of the Brownsville indictment exceeded the

three-year statutory maximum term authorized for his money laundering

conspiracy offense. The Government concedes that the five-year term of

supervised release imposed was erroneous.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), “[a]ny person who conspires to commit

any offense defined in this section or section 1957 shall be subject to the same

penalties as those prescribed for the offense the commission of which was the

object of the conspiracy.” The underlying offense charged in Count Two of the

Brownsville indictment was money laundering, which carries a maximum

statutory penalty of 20 years of imprisonment and is thus a Class C felony.

§ 1956(a)(1); 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(3). Therefore, the permissible term of

supervised release for Count Two was not more than three years. 18 U.S.C.

3583(b)(2).

The sentence with respect to the five-year term of supervised release

imposed on Count Two in the Brownsville indictment is vacated, and the case is

remanded to the district courtfor resentencing on the term of supervised release

imposed for the money laundering conspiracy count. See United States v.

Gonzalez, 259 F.3d 355, 361 & n. 3 (5th Cir. 2001).

SENTENCE VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED.
#### § 1717.1205 Waiver of existing conditions on borrowers.

Pursuant to section 331(b) of the Con Act, the Administrator, at his or her sole discretion, may waive or otherwise reduce conditions and requirements imposed on a borrower by its loan documents if the Administrator determines that such action will contribute to enhancement of the government's recovery of debt. Such waivers or reductions in conditions and requirements under this section shall not include the exercise of any of the debt settlement measures set forth in § 1717.1204(c), which are subject to all of the requirements of said § 1717.1204.
----

----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |

| Dated:       December 23, 2008                                                                                |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                               |   |
| /s/       Yijun Wang                                                                                     |   |
| Yijun      WangChief      Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, President      & Director |

----
P /: 2lj

Adams. Kevin (OST)

From: .

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Dear Kevin,

Vincent, Matt S. <mvincent@bsb.mt.gov>

Friday, November 29, 2013 4:09 PM

Adams, Kevin (OST)

pshea@butteairport.com

Butte-Silver Bow City-County government support and comments regarding Skywest

EASproposa I

Pleaseaccept this email on behalf of Butte-Silver Bow City-County in support of SkyWest airlines' proposal to continue providing

direct air service from Butte to Salt LakeCity International Airport under the EssentialAir Service program. Over my ll-month

tenure as the City-County government's Chief Executive, I have been very pleased with the service and the cooperation our local

airport has received from SkyWest/Delta.

That said, there are also a few items in the proposal I would like to address that I hope will begin Butte-Silver Bow's endeavor to not

only maintain, but to expand the flight services that SkyWest provides to our community.

• Minimum of 14 round-trip flights per week. I urge SkyWestto consider adding a third flight daily to the Butte air services

(and potentially additional flights) if the demand exists and as long as our boardings continue to climb. Butte is pleased to

see that its boardings are up around 40% this year as compared to previous years.

• Canadair Regional Jet 200 (CJR200)SO-seatturbojet aircraft. While this size aircraft is apparently the standard for this RFP,

Butte would like to be aware of any changesSkyWest may propose to use other jets, i.e. if CJR200'sare taken out of

service/replaced by larger aircraft for any industry and/or economic reasons, Butte still needs to get its minimum 14 flights

per week (and more if demand warrants).

• For meeting both tourism and businessdemands, any possibilities of adding additional flights out of Butte direct to

Skywest's other hubs, primarily in Seattle, would be greatiy appreciated.

In closing, we strongly support SkyWest Airlines proposal and are excited about and appreciative of its continued commitment to

provide quality air service to our community. Pleasedon't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns and thank

you in advance for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Matt Vincent,

Chief Executive

Butte-Silver Bow City-County

1
Exhibit 10.5

LOGO

December 30, 2008

Kathryn V. Marinello

[Address]

Re:     Executive Employment Agreement

Dear Kathy:

This letter will constitute an amendment clarifying the terms of your Executive Employment Agreement, amended and restated November 9, 2007
(Employment Agreement), which amendment is intended to assure compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

Section 1.11, which defines Good Reason, will require you to provide Ceridian a 30-day period for the opportunity to cure any event for which you have provided written notice.

Sections 4.03(a) and 7.03(f), concerning the execution of a release, are amended to require that you submit your executed release to Ceridian within 30
days of your termination of employment. In addition, the last sentence of the form of Release attached to your Employment Agreement will be revised to read as follows: If I do not return to Ceridian an executed duplicate original of this
Release within 30 days following my termination of employment, Ceridian will have no obligation to make the payment described herein.

Please acknowledge your acceptance of the terms of this amendment to your Employment Agreement by executing this letter where indicated below and returning it to the undersigned.



Sincerely,CERIDIAN CORPORATION/s/ Kairus K. TaraporeKairus K. Tarapore, Executive Vice President,Human Resources




|                        
|------------------------
|Accepted:               
|                        
|/s/ Kathryn V. Marinello
|Kathryn V. Marinello    
|Date: December 30, 2008