MAll R OF K—S--YIn DEPORTATION Proceedings 

A-9825443 

Decided by Board Janu-ary 30, 1961 

Suspension of deportation—Eligibility—Application requirement under section 

244(a)(1), 1952 act. 

An application for adjustment of status under section 6, Refugee Relief Act 

1f4:■:-i. is not equivalent to, and may not lie s- uhstituted far, an application for suspension of deportation under section 244(a) (1) of the 1952 Act. 

CHARGE: 

Warrant: Act of 1924—Remained longer—seaman. 

BEFORE THE BOARD 

DISCUSSION: An order entered by the Assistant Commissioner, 

Immigration and Naturalization Service on July 25, 1951. provides 

for the deportation of the respondent as an alien who subsequent to 

entry as a seaman remained longer than permitted. An appeal 

from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner was dismissed by 

the Board of Immigration Appeals on NOvember 15, 1951. The respondent now moves this Board to reopen the proceedings to permit the filing of an application for suspension of deportation under 

section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 

U.S.C. 1254). 

The respondent, a native and citizen of China, male, unmarried, 

34 years of age, alleges that he last entered the United States as a 

seaman through the port of New Orleans, on or about December 5, 

1949. 

Respondent's motion to reopen the proceedings to permit application for suspension of deportation is predicated on the theory that 

he is now statutorily eligible for this relief. Neither his motion nor 

the brief in support thereof makes any reference as to which paragraph of section 244, supra, respondent relies upon in his claim of 

eligibility. 

Clearly, respondent is not statutorily eligible for relief under subparagraphs 2, 3, 4 and that portion of subparagraph 5 of section 

244(a) which relates Lu remained-longer seamen because he did not 

209. 

654377-63 is 
last enter the United States "within two years prior to ... the date 

of enactment" of the 1952 Act (June 27, 1952). Since no application for suspension of deportation was filed under section 19(c) of 

the Immigration Act of 1917, the savings clause of the 1952 Act 

(section 405(a) ; 8 U.S,C. 1101, note) does not inure to respondent's benefit. 

Respondent apparently seeks to establish eligibility for suspension of deportation under section 244(a) (1) [8 U.S.C. 1254(a) (1)] 

on the basis of an application filed pursuant to section 6 of the 

Refugee Relief Act of 1953. He maintains that this application for 

adjustment of status, filed on June 23, 1955, and extended to August 

31, 1957, is tantamount to an application for suspension of deportation and, therefore, is a proceeding which in effect sought the same 

relief as suspension of deportation. 

Paragraph 1 of section 244(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, by its terms, expired on December 24, 1957. Respondent apparently is of the belief that he is now statutorily eligible for suspension of deportation under the expired paragraph 

regardless of the fact, that he did not file an application with the 

Attorney General within the statutory five-year period. He reasons 

that the section 6 (Refugee Relief Act of 1953) application filed 

June 23, 1955, may be substituted for the application required by 

paragraph 1 of section 244(0. Rup-ra_ Respondent cites no authority to support his position. An application to adjust status under 

section 6 of the Refugee Relief Act of 1953 is not tantamount to an 

application for suspension of deportation as the respective acts provide entirely different standards for eligibility thereunder. Section 6 of the 1953 Act requires that the application must be filed 

not later than June 30, 1955. Paragraph 1 of section 244(a), supra, 

requires, inter alia, physical presence in the United States for a 

"continuous period of not less than seven years immediately preceding the date of (filing) such application." (Emphasis supplied.) 

Respondent on June 23, 1955, the date he filed his section 6 application, did not have seven years of continuous physical presence in 

the United States. He last entered on December 5, 1949. 

An appropriate order will be entered. 

ORDER: It is directed that the uiuLiuu be and the same is hereby 

denied. 

210