alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1230.73 Uses of distributed assessments. ( a ) Each State association shall use its distribution of assessments pursuant to § 1230.72, as well as any proceeds from the investment of such funds pending their use, for financing plans and projects and the administrative expenses incurred in connection therewith, including the cost of administering nominations and elections of producer members of the Delegate Body.
( b ) The Council shall use its distribution of assessments pursuant to § 1230.72, as well as any proceeds from the investment of such funds pending their use, for financing plans and projects and the Council's administrative expenses.
( c ) The Board shall use its distribution of assessments pursuant to § 1230.72, as well as any proceeds from the investment of such funds pending their use, for: ( 1 ) Financing plans and projects;
( 2 ) The Board's expenses for the Board's administration, maintenance, and functioning as authorized by the Secretary;
( 3 ) Accumulation of a reserve not to exceed one fiscal period's budget to permit continuation of an effective promotion, research, and consumer information program in years when assessment amounts may be reduced; and
( 4 ) The Secretary's administrative costs in carrying out this part.
§ 1735.24 Additional reporting requirements. ( a ) Entities receiving financial assistance from RUS that are used for retail broadband must submit annual reports for 3 years after project completion. The reports must include the following information: ( 1 ) The purpose of the financing, including new equipment and capacity enhancements that support high-speed broadband access for educational institutions, health care providers, and public safety service providers (including the estimated number of end users who are currently using or forecasted to use the new or upgraded infrastructure); and
( 2 ) The progress towards fulfilling the objectives for which the assistance was made, including: ( i ) The number of service points that will receive new broadband service, existing network improvements, and facility upgrades resulting from the federal assistance;
( ii ) The speed of the broadband services;
( iii ) The average price of the most subscribed tier of retail broadband service in each PFSA;
( iv ) The number of new subscribers generated from the project; and
( v ) Complete, reliable, and precise geolocation information that indicates the location of new broadband service that is being provided or upgraded within the service territory supported by the grant, loan, or loan guarantee.
( b ) A notice will be published on the Agency's website that will include each annual broadband improvement report, redacted as appropriate to protect any proprietary information in the report.
[86 FR 50609, Sept. 10, 2021]
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 9 -00505-CV G r e go r y D ani e ls , A ppe lla nt

v . Edi th F unes, App ellee F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, NO . 09 -19 12 -FC4 , H ON ORAB LE JO HN McMAS TE R , J UDGE PRES ID IN G

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Appellant Gr eg ory

Daniels filed his notice of appe al on August 25, 2009. The c lerk’s rec ord and r eporte r’s recor d wer e due in this Court on September 8, 2009. O n September 30, 2009, this Court receive d notice fr om the Wil liamson County district c lerk’s office that appellant ha d not paid or made arr ang ements to pay for the c lerk’s r ecor d. On October 6, 2009, the clerk of this Court sent notice to appe llant that t h i s ap p ea l would be dismissed for wa nt of prosec ution if he did not respond to this Court’s notice on or befor e Oc tober 16, 2009. SeeTex. R. App. P . 37.3(b). To date, appellant has not responde d to this Court’s notice. Ac cording ly , we dismiss the appea l for wa nt of prosec ution. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.3(b), ( c).2 __________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Puryear and Pember

ton Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: De cembe r 2, 2009
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHigh speed turboprop aeroacoustic study (counterrotation). Volume 1: Model developmentThe isolated counterrotating high speed turboprop noise prediction program was compared with model data taken in the GE Aircraft Engines Cell 41 anechoic facility, the Boeing Transonic Wind Tunnel, and in NASA-Lewis' 8x6 and 9x15 wind tunnels. The predictions show good agreement with measured data under both low and high speed simulated flight conditions. The installation effect model developed for single rotation, high speed turboprops was extended to include counterotation. The additional effect of mounting a pylon upstream of the forward rotor was included in the flow field modeling. A nontraditional mechanism concerning the acoustic radiation from a propeller at angle of attach was investigated. Predictions made using this approach show results that are in much closer agreement with measurement over a range of operating conditions than those obtained via traditional fluctuating force methods. The isolated rotors and installation effects models were combines into a single prediction program, results of which were compared with data taken during the flight test of the B727/UDF engine demonstrator aircraft. Satisfactory comparisons between prediction and measured data for the demonstrator airplane, together with the identification of a nontraditional radiation mechanism for propellers at angle of attack are achieved.Document ID19900017317Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWhitfield, C. E.*(General Electric Co. Cincinnati, OH, United States)*Mani, R.*(General Electric Co. Cincinnati, OH, United States)*Gliebe, P. R.*(General Electric Co. Cincinnati, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:185241NASA-CR-185241Accession Number90N26633Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 535-05-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-23721Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017317.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 1710.1 General statement.

This part establishes general and pre-loan policies and requirements that apply to both insured and guaranteed loans to finance the construction and improvement of electric facilities in rural areas, including generation, transmission, and distribution facilities.

[87 FR 73436, Nov. 30, 2022]
Exhibit
15.1




Patrizio
      & Zhao, LLCCertified
      Public Accountants and Consultants
              
              322
      Route 46 WestParsippany,
      NJ 07054Tel:  (973)
      882-8810Fax:
      (973) 882-0788www.pzcpa.com






October
29, 2008





U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission


Division
of Corporate Finance


100 F.
Street, N.E.


Washington,
D.C. 20549








To Whom
It May Concern:





We are
aware that JPAK Group, Inc. has included our report dated February 11, 2008,
(Except for Note 1, 15, 16, 17 and 18, as to which the date is October 29,
2008), in its 10Q/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2007. We are also aware
of our responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933.





Yours
truly,








/s/ Patrizio & Zhao,
LLC


PATRIZIO
& ZHAO, LLC


Certified
Public Accountants and Consultants





Parsippany,
New Jersey
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28469]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel, Member Conflict: Behavioral Aspects of HIV/AIDS.
    Date: December 3, 2010.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Mark P. Rubert, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5218, MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
1775, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#becccbdcdbcccad3feddcdcc90d0d7d690d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d4f485f584f49507d5e4e4f13535455135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 5, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-28469 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1811 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1811

  To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
  areas included in Florida System Unit P-16, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2013

  Mr. Radel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
  areas included in Florida System Unit P-16, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL FROM JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM 
              OF AREAS INCLUDED IN FLORIDA SYSTEM UNIT P-16.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall revise maps referred to in 
section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) 
as necessary to remove from Florida System Unit P-16--
            (1) the area known as Royal Marco Point on Marco Island, 
        Collier County, Florida; and
            (2) the area known as La Peninsula of the Isles of Capri in 
        Naples, Collier County, Florida.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF INSURANCE UNDER THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE 
              PROGRAM FOR AREAS REMOVED FROM FLORIDA SYSTEM UNIT P-16.

    Section 1316 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 
4023) shall not apply with respect to a property located in an area 
described in paragraph (1) or (2) of section 1 unless--
            (1) the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 
        Agency determines that such property would have been declared 
        by a duly constituted State or local zoning authority, or other 
        authorized public body, to be in violation of State or local 
        laws, regulations, or ordinances as described in such section 
        1316 without regard to whether section 1 of this Act had been 
        in effect at the time of the declaration by such State or local 
        zoning authority or such other authorized public body; or
            (2) after the date of the enactment of this Act, a duly 
        constituted State or local zoning authority, or other 
        authorized public body, finds such property to be in violation 
        of State or local laws, regulations, or ordinances described in 
        such section 1316.
                                 <all>
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Private Schools: Emergency Management Planning for All Settings      

# Resource: Private Schools: Emergency Management Planning for All Settings

This fact sheet (PDF, 7 pages) explores emergency management planning considerations and challenges that are unique to private schools. The fact sheet describes challenges and considerations for private schools and provides a six-step planning process for the development and implementation of school emergency operations plans (EOPs). This resource also includes guidance on engaging community partners in emergency planning. Additional resources are provided. **Learn more (7 pages).**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1681

HILDA LEAH FLOYD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Transportation Security 

Administration (UC Express); TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMIN 

AGENCY, (US Express),

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:09-cv-00735-RDB)

Submitted: October 21, 2014 Decided: October 23, 2014

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hilda Leah Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ronald Baldwin, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Hilda Leah Floyd seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying her motions to reopen her civil case and to 

answer new information. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s orders were entered on the docket 

on March 4, 2014. The notice of appeal was filed on July 2, 

2014.* Because Floyd failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. Floyd’s motion to seal her informal brief 

is granted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

 * Floyd filed her notice of appeal in this Court on July 2, 

2014, and it was thereafter forwarded to the district court. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 4(d). 
3

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1470.37 Environmental credits for conservation improvements. ( a ) NRCS will not prohibit a participant under this part from participating in, and receiving compensation from, an environmental services market if one of the purposes of the market is the facilitation of additional conservation benefits that are consistent with CSP purposes, as determined by NRCS. CSP participation may create environmental benefits that qualify for environmental credits under an environmental credit-trading program. NRCS will not prohibit a participant under this part from participating in, or receiving compensation from, an environmental credit-trading program, and NRCS asserts no direct or indirect interest in these credits. However, in addition, any requirements or standards of an environmental market program in which a CSP participant simultaneously enrolls to receive environmental credits must be compatible with the purposes and requirements of the CSP contract and with this part. NRCS retains the authority to ensure that CSP purposes are met and that one of the purposes of the market is the facilitation of additional conservation benefits that are consistent with CSP purposes.
( b ) The participant must meet all operation and maintenance requirements for CSP-funded activities, consistent with §§ 1470.21 and 1470.23. Where activities required under an environmental credit agreement may affect the land and conservation activities under a CSP contract, NRCS recommends that CSP participants request assistance with the development of a compatibility assessment prior to entering into any credit agreement. The CSP contract may be modified in accordance with policies outlined in § 1470.25 provided the modifications meet CSP purposes and is in compliance with this part.
( c ) CSP participants may not use CSP funds to implement conservation practices and activities that the participant is required to establish because of a court order.
Report of Management on Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.'s Internal
Control Over the Preparation of Monthly Servicer's Certificates
Relative to the Servicing of Automobile Loan Receivables

October 31, 2003

We, as members of management of Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B., (the
Bank) are responsible for establishing and maintaining effective
internal control over the preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates
relative to the servicing of automobile loan receivables owned by Chevy
Chase Auto Receivables Trusts Series 2000-1, 2000-2, 2001-1, 2001-2
and 2001-3 (collectively referred to as the "Trusts" herein).  Internal
control is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Bank's
management and board of directors regarding the preparation of reliable
monthly Servicer's Certificates.  Internal control over the preparation of
monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing of automobile
loan receivables owned by the Trusts includes self-monitoring
mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are
identified. Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, no
matter how well-designed, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur
and not be detected, including the possibility of the circumvention or
overriding of controls.  Accordingly, even effective internal control over
the preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to the servicing
of automobile loan receivables owned by the Trusts can provide only
reasonable assurance with respect to the monthly Servicer's Certificates
preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, internal control
effectiveness may vary over time.

The Bank assessed its internal control as of September 30, 2003 based on
criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in
"Internal Control-Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, we assert that the Bank maintained effective internal
control over the preparation of monthly Servicer's Certificates relative to
the servicing of automobile loan receivables owned by the Trusts as of
September 30, 2003 based on the specified criteria.




  /s/  Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.         /s/ Mark A. Holles
Stephen R. Halpin, Jr.			Mark A. Holles
Executive Vice President and Chief 	Group Vice President
Financial Officer

 /s/  Joel A. Friedman                /s/  Thomas E. Uglietta
Joel A. Friedman			Thomas E. Uglietta
Senior Vice President and Controller 	Vice President
**EXHIBIT
      16.1**





[LETTERHEAD
      OF RAYMOND CHABOT GRANT THORNTON LLP]





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      have
      issued our report dated October 15, 2008 with respect to the consolidated
      financial statements included in the Annual Report of Avensys Corporation on
      Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008. We hereby consent to the
      incorporation by reference of the said report in the Registration Statement
      of
      Avensys Corporation on Form S-8 (No. 333-145604, effective August 21, 2007).


/s/
                  Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLPRaymond
                  Chabot Grant Thornton LLPChartered
                  AccountantsMontreal,
                  Quebec, CanadaOctober
                  17, 2008
T4

T7

T10

T8

T3

M5

M6

T6

T5

T2

M2

M1

M8

M12

M7

M13

M4

T15

T16

RX2

RX1

T13

T11

T9

M9

RX5

T12

T14

RX3

M10

T-33

T-32

T-37

T-35

M-11

T-30

M-16 T-34 T-23

RX-08

T-26

M-25 T-24

M-24

0 0.5 1 2 3

Miles 4 ml 4/09

Sugar Pine Map 9

Goshawk PAC

Legend

Goshawk