alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW160109]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Craig Settle for competitive oil and gas lease WYW160109 for land in Fremont County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Julie L. Weaver, Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre, or fraction thereof, per year                           ( print page 69125)                        and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the BLM is proposing to reinstate lease WYW160109 effective April 1, 2010, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above. The BLM has not issued a valid lease to any other interest affecting the lands.                

Julie L. Weaver,

Chief, Fluid Minerals Adjudication.

[FR Doc. 2010-28341 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
JOSB FY 2012 EX 10.8(i)






Exhibit 10.8(i)






FIFTEENTH  AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of the 2nd day of April, 2013 to that certain EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of November 30, 1999, (as previously amended, the “Employment Agreement”), by and between ROBERT HENSLEY (“Employee”) and JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC. (“Employer”).     


FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Employer and Employee, being the sole parties to the Employment Agreement, hereby amend the Employment Agreement and agree that, subject to earlier termination as otherwise set forth in the Employment Agreement, the last day of the Employment Period shall be January 31, 2015.


Except as specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to its terms. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the remainder of the Employment Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control and prevail. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have those respective meanings attributed to them in the Employment Agreement. This Amendment shall hereafter be deemed a part of the Employment Agreement for all purposes. The terms of employment set forth in this Amendment have been approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Employer.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
    


JOS. A. BANK CLOTHIERS, INC.


	
				
	By:
	/s/ CHARLES D. FRAZER
	 
	/s/ ROBERT HENSLEY

	 
	Charles D. Frazer,
Senior Vice President-General Counsel
	 
	ROBERT HENSLEY
#### § 1051.45 Market administrator's reports and announcements concerning classification.

See § 1000.45.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of H-Lines Finance Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 25, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, M. Mark Urbania, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                               
|/s/    M. MARK URBANIA                                                                         
|M. Mark Urbania Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
|                                                                                               
|November 2, 2005
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1470.26 Contract renewal. ( a ) During the first half of the fifth year of the initial contract period, NRCS may allow a participant to apply and compete for the opportunity under § 1470.20 to renew the contract to receive payments for an additional 5-year period, subject to the availability of funds, if the participant meets criteria from paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) To be considered for contract renewal, the participant must— ( 1 ) Be in compliance with the terms of their existing contract as determined by NRCS;
( 2 ) Add any newly acquired eligible land that is part of the agricultural operation that NRCS determines must be included in the renewal contract;
( 3 ) Agree to adopt and continue to integrate new or improved conservation activities across the entire agricultural operation, demonstrating continued improvement during the additional 5-year period, as determined by NRCS; and
( 4 ) By the end of the renewal contract period, agree to meet or exceed the stewardship threshold of at least two additional priority resource concerns on the agricultural operation; or to adopt or improve conservation activities, as determined by NRCS, to achieve higher levels of conservation performance with respect to not less than two existing priority resource concerns that are specified by the Chief in the initial contract.
( c ) NRCS will determine a participant ineligible for a new CSP contract on an agricultural operation for 2 years following expiration of their prior contract if the participant does not enter a renewal contract on the agricultural operation at the end of the prior contract period.
[84 FR 60891, Nov. 12, 2019, as amended at 85 FR 64003, Oct. 9, 2020]
NICOR Inc.   
                                                               Form S-8     
                                                               Exhibit 23.01




                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this Form S-8 Registration Statement of our report dated
January 28, 1997, included in the NICOR Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                       Arthur Andersen LLP


Chicago, Illinois
June 4, 1997
Exhibit 32.2

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’) on or about the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Alan Ginsberg, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: November 9, 2007

/s/ Alan Ginsberg
Alan Ginsberg
Chief Financial Officer

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

,

Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 18, 2018 

# Order

Clerk July 18, 2018

154442 ( 17 6 )

ALI BAZZI,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

and

GENEX PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC. and

ELITE CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, PC,

Intervening Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

and

TRANSMEDIC, LLC,

Intervening Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 154442

v C OA: 320518

Wayne CC: 13

- 000659

- NF

SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant/Third

- Party

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

and

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

HALA BAYDOUN BAZZI and

MARIAM BAZZI

,

Third

- Party Defendants

- Appellees.

________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of appellee Sentinel Insurance Company

to file a reply to the amicus curiae brief of the Michigan Association for Justice and the

joint amicus curiae brief of Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital, LLC

, and Jamie

Letkemann is GRANT ED. The reply submitted on December 27, 2017, is accepted for

filing.
**Exhibit 31.2**
CERTIFICATION
     I, Paul J. Crecca, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 ofHaights Cross Communications, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date:March 30, 2005 By: /s/ Paul J. Crecca     Name: Paul J. Crecca Title: Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-20538

Summary Calendar

____________

Steven E. Greer, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

The Lancet; Dan Erkes; Elsevier; RELX plc, 

Defendants—Appellees.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:23-CV-3761

______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Steven Greer appeals from the district court’s dismissal with 

prejudice of his action against The Lancet, Dan Erkes, Elsevier, and RELX 

PLC (“Defendants”). Greer filed his complaint on October 5, 2023. 

Fourteen days later—before Defendants filed either an answer or a motion 

for summary judgment, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)—Greer filed a 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 16, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-20538 Document: 52-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/16/2024
No. 23-20538

2

notice of voluntary dismissal, “giv[ing] notice that the [] action is voluntarily 

dismissed without prejudice against the defendants.” 

The following day, the district court purported to dismiss the case 

“with prejudice as to all Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).” The court’s order provided no further reasoning. 

Under Rule 41(a)(1)(B), however, “dismissal is without prejudice,” unless 

“the plaintiff previously dismissed any federal- or state-court action based on 

or including the same claim.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B) (emphasis 

added); see Welsh v. Correct Care, L.L.C., 915 F.3d 341, 342-44 (5th Cir. 

2019). 

Accordingly, we VACATE and REMAND to the district court to 

explain whether Greer has previously dismissed any action based on the same 

claim or, in the alternative, to DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Greer’s action.1

 

_____________________

1 Greer’s motion to supplement the record on appeal is DENIED AS MOOT. 

Case: 23-20538 Document: 52-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/16/2024
EXHIBIT 10(f)



INNOVA PURE WATER, INC.

13130 56th Court. Suite 609

Clearwater, Florida 33760

John E. Nohren, Jr.

Cl1airman and Treasurer



May 16, 2005



Referencing the te1ephonic Board of Directors meeting held on May 16th, 2005, related to the deferred compensation and options held by John Nohren and Rose Smith.  After much discussion, which covered numerous details, among which were that neither party accumulated deferred income or options subsequent to March 31.2004.  It was also noted that neither party had received actual payment for their services for an extended period preceding March 31, 2004.  Both parties worked constantly throughout this period until this day without compensation.  Through their efforts and financial support they were able to sustain Innova as a viable Corporation for the Shareho1ders, and position the Company for the pending acquisition.



1n addition both parties had paid numerous charges for Company related expenses from their own accounts without reimbursement.



As a condition of concluding the acquisition of Numera Software and DesertView Management, which has been deemed to be desirable for the Innova shareholders, who in turn for fifty percent of Innova, will receive one-hundred percent of the subject Companies plus financial transactions infusing $112,000 and removing $188,000 of debt from the Corporations books; the following was resolved:



1.

Rose Smith in exchange for deferred income of $223,861, will receive 1,316,829 shares of stock issued under rule 144.

2.

Rose Smith will exchange her current option package for 1,250,000 shares on a 1/3 basis and receive 417,667 shares issued under rule 144.

3.

John Nohren in exchange for deferred income of $93,927 will receive 552,512 shares of stock issued under rule 144.

4.

John Nohren will exchange his current option package for 1,270,000 shares on a 1/3 basis and receive 423,333 shares issued under rule 144.



One further condition required by Innova's outside Director was that the non-reimbursed expenses:



1.

Of Rose Smith shall not be reimbursed for more than $3,000 even though her actual expenses personally accrued may be more.

2.

Of John Nohren, will be personally absorbed through the date of closing.



The resolution passed by unanimous vote; the signatures of the Directors follow.





John E. Nohren - Chairman





Rose Smith - Director





Peter Christensen - Director
Lake Pleasant

Regional Park

Hieroglyphic

Mountains RMZ

Castle

Hot

Springs Road

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

19

31

31

30

07

31

18

32

23

12

13

26

11

14

24

35

05

33

29

35 32

28 25

20

01

12

16

31

19 20

16

02

16

21

12

34

07

21

31

21

04

06

13

10

17

34

21

35

09

26

26

30

15

36

26

09

25

06

25 29

14

32

28

05

13

28

36

36

19

01

17

11

17

01

16

07 08

27

34 34

02

27

31

05

25

32

20

35

32 33

14

24

26

11

22

09

28

08

08

36

33

20

04

17

14

32

11

02

29

09

22 23

28

20

21

34 35

35

04

23

18

30 29

05

04

23

15

04

33

36

24

29

22

27

24

13

32

36

17

33

12

09

15

08

29

03

25

04 03

18

27

33

03 05

08 10

16

10

01

06

16

02

03

33

07

06

33

08

17

19

31

18

30

18

32

01

30

06

29

20

09

28

06

06

19

30

33

19

05

28

04

07

31 32

05

21

04

04 02

06

05

02

01

03

07

18

03

34

06

28

22

25

27

30 28 27 26 30 29

15

31

05

29 30

10

03

34

27

15

22

10

34

03

27

22

15

34

10

03

27

36

12

01

13

24

25

25

36

01

07

12

08

13

09

24

10

25

11

36

01

12 12 07 08 09 10 11 12 07 08 09 10

24

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

± Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

Map 2-90

Morgan City Wash Road

Alternative E

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Miles

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Recreation Management

Zone (RMZ)

?Â

Wilderness Characteristics

Section

Morgan

City

Wash

Road

Morgan City Wash

Road

BLM Wilderness

County Boundary

Yavapai County

Maricopa County

Stream or Wash
1

June 10, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket

Management System

1200 NewJersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: FAA Exemption No. 11675 pursuant to Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0713 as well as Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform 

Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23{b); 14

C.F.R. Part 21; 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a)&(b); 91.7(a); 91.9( b); (2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 119.121; 91.lSl(a); 91.203(a)&(b); 

91.405(a);91.407(a) (1); 91.409(a) (2); 91.417 (a )&(b)

Dear Sir or Madam,

I, Kevin M. Kralicek, am requesting a petition to amend FAA Exemption No. 11675. The amendment will

follow all guidance, guidelines, and rules outlined in FAA Exemption No. 11675. The proposed 

amendment is to include a DJI S1000 Octocopter capable of carrying higher quality photographic 

equipment. This UAS will be used for the same purposes as outlined in FAA Exemption No. 11675. The 

UAS will be under the 55 pound capacity including payload (UAS weight is 24.2 pounds including camera 

and batteries) and will not exceed the 87 knot guidance (100mph). The proposed UAS, DJI S1000, is 

more sophisticated in flight characteristics and has an additional failsafe that the Tarot 650 does not have. 

The additional failsafe is in redundancy, drop protection, and Flight Limit of Special Areas as documented 

in Appendix A (4.3.2 or page 71 of this document) and can be checked and verified at 

http://www.dji.com/fly-safe/category-mc. If 1-2 of the motors fail, the UAS can still land safely without 

crash or incident. Also, if the motors cease a parachute will be deployed. All preflight checks/inspections, 

in flight terminations, and post flight checks/inspections will remain the same. Enclosed below are the 

manuals for the DJI S1000 and the DJI A2 flight controller. The following will be the additions and 

changes to “Appendix A” of the original document:

Appendix A

Kevin M. Kralicek

Tarot 650 w/ DJI NAZA M V2 & GPS

DJI S1000 w/ DJI A2 & GPS

Operator Manual
2

Further, the following documents will be added to “Appendix A”:
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93

Respectfully submitted,

Kevin M. Kralicek

Kevin M. Kralicek, Owner

Kralicek Aerial Photography

8212 Winding Stream LN

Denton, TX 762