alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.2





            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the:

(i)  Registration Statement No. 33-29287 on Form S-8 and related Prospectus with
     respect to the 1989 Long Term Performance  Incentive Plan of NL Industries,
     Inc.; and

(ii) Registration Statement No. 33-25913 on Form S-8 and related Prospectus with
     respect to the NL Industries, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan; and

(iii)Registration  Statement  No.  333-65817 on Form S-8 and related  Prospectus
     with respect to the NL Industries, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and

(iv) Registration Statement No. 33-48145 on Form S-8 and related Prospectus with
     respect to the NL Industries, Inc. 1992 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
     Plan.

of our  reports  dated March 30, 2005  relating  to the  consolidated  financial
statements,  management's  assessment of the  effectiveness  of internal control
over  financial  reporting  and  the  effectiveness  of  internal  control  over
financial  reporting  of  Kronos  Worldwide,  Inc.,  which are  incorporated  by
reference in this Form 10-K.



                                                     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Dallas, Texas
March 30, 2005
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

  West Virginia

> - Wheeling
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1435.101 Loan rates. ( a ) The national average loan rate for raw cane sugar produced from domestically grown sugarcane may be established based on rates that comply with applicable statutes, and may be adjusted by CCC to reflect grade, type, quality, and other factors as applicable.
( b ) The national average loan rate for refined beet sugar from domestically grown sugar beets may be established based on rates that comply with applicable statutes, and may be adjusted by CCC to reflect grade, type, quality, and other factors as applicable
( c ) Loan rates for eligible sugar are adjusted to reflect the processing location of the sugar offered as loan collateral.
( d ) Loan rates for eligible in-process sugar shall equal 80 percent of the loan rate applicable to raw cane sugar or beet sugar on the basis of the expected production of raw sugar or beet sugar from the in-process sugar or syrups.
[67 FR 54928, Aug. 26, 2002, as amended at 74 FR 15364, Apr. 6, 2009; 80 FR 141, Jan. 2, 2015; 86 FR 70708, Dec. 13, 2021]
#### § 1006.76 Payments by a handler operating a partially regulated distributing plant.

See § 1000.76.
§ 1489.13 Application process. ( a ) *General application requirements.* CCC will periodically issue a NOFO through the *Grants.gov* website announcing that it is accepting applications for participation in the RAPP. Applications shall be submitted in accordance with the terms and requirements specified in the NOFO and in this part. Applicants may apply to conduct a generic promotion program and/or a brand promotion program that provides RAPP funds to brand participants for brand promotion, as well as to conduct other market promotion activities, including activities to address existing or potential non-tariff trade barriers. An applicant that is a U.S. agricultural cooperative may also apply for funds to conduct its own brand promotion program.
( b ) *Requests for evaluation information.* CCC may request any information that it deems necessary to evaluate an application, including, but not limited to, performance measurement information. Applicants shall provide any requested information in the manner and according to the timeframe specified by CCC.
( c ) *Special rules governing demonstration projects funded with CCC resources.* CCC will consider proposals for demonstration projects, provided: ( 1 ) No more than one such demonstration project per constraint is undertaken within a market;
( 2 ) The constraint to be addressed in the target market is a lack of technical knowledge or expertise;
( 3 ) The demonstration project is a practical and cost-effective method of overcoming the constraint; and
( 4 ) A third party must participate in such project through a written agreement with the RAPP Participant.
( d ) *Universal identifier and System for Award Management (SAM).* In accordance with 2 CFR part 25, each entity that applies to the RAPP program and does not qualify for an exemption under 2 CFR 25.110 must: ( 1 ) Be registered in SAM prior to submitting an application or plan;
( 2 ) Maintain an active SAM registration with current information at all times during which it has an active Federal award or an application or plan under consideration by CCC; and
( 3 ) Provide its unique identifier in each application or plan it submits to CCC.
( e ) *Reporting subaward and executive compensation information.* In accordance with 2 CFR part 170, each entity that applies to the RAPP program and does not qualify for an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b) must ensure it has the necessary processes and systems in place to comply with the applicable reporting requirements of 2 CFR part 170 should it receive RAPP funding.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T21:33:11-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### § 1221.9 First handler.

*First handler* means the first person who buys or takes possession (excluding a common or contract carrier of sorghum owned by another) of more than 1,000 bushels of grain sorghum; or 5,000 tons of sorghum forage, sorghum hay, sorghum haylage, sorghum billets, or sorghum silage from producers in a calendar year for marketing. The term first handler includes a producer who markets sorghum of the producer's own production directly to consumers. In any case in which sorghum is pledged as collateral for a loan issued under any Commodity Credit Corporation price support loan program and the sorghum is forfeited by the producer in lieu of loan repayment, the Commodity Credit Corporation will be considered a first handler.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Benjamin Leboe, certify that: 

- I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of C-Chip Technologies Corporation;   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
- The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;  b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Dated this 29th day of September, 2003.

 
/s/ Benjamin LeboeBenjamin LeboePrincipal Financial Officer
#### Philip J. Broderick, appellee, v. George Simlesa and Pauline Simlesa, appellants.

Gen. No. 33,793.

*637Opinion filed January 27, 1930.

Irene M. Lefkow, for appellants. Danaher & Harriott, for appellee; James J. Danaher, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court,
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

# **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

#  

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-147958 on Form S-3of our report dated March 2, 2009 (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption ofFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, “Accountingfor Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No.109”),relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule of Northern States Power Company – Minnesota and subsidiariesappearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northern States PowerCompany – Minnesota and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

 
| /S/ DELOITTE &  TOUCHE LLP |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Minneapolis,  Minnesota             |   |
| March 2,  2009                 |   |

 

----
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76
38 39 40 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/27 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****SAR activityreview.**** 
SuDocNumber:T1.67/3:
ItemNumber:0923-B-06(online)
CGPsystem Number: 000610489
 
 - sar_tti_01.pdfsar_tti_02.pdfsar_tti_03.pdfsar_tti_04.pdfsar_tti_05.pdfsar_tti_06.pdfsar_tti_07.pdfsar_tti_08.pdfsar_tti_09.pdfsar_tti_10.pdfsar_tti_11.pdfsar_tti_12.pdfsar_tti_13.pdfsar_tti_14.pdfsar_tti_15.pdfsar_tti_16.pdfsar_tti_17.pdfsar_tti_18.pdfsar_tti_19.pdfsar_tti_20.pdfsar_tti_21.pdfsar_tti_22.pdfsar_tti_23.pdf
 
 **
<STYLE type="text/css"><!--.sub {font-size: 19pt; font-family:"times"; font-weight:"bold";font-variant: normal; font-style: normal; color:#000000"}H3 {font-weight: bold; font-size: 19pt; line-height: 19pt; font-family: times; font-style: bold; color:#000000}H2 {font-weight:bold; font-size:12pt; line-height:13pt; letter-spacing:0px; font-family:arial; color:#000000}.para { font-size: 10pt; font-family:arial; line-height:13pt; margin-left: 2em; color: #000000; font-variant: normal; font-style: normal}.ind {font-size: 10pt; font-family:arial; line-height:13pt; margin-left: 2em; color:#000000;font-variant: normal; font-style: normal}spacing="0" v:link {color:#8B4434 text-decoration: none}a:link { text-decoration: none; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serifcolor:#8B4434}--></STYLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James B. Gillespie, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, without prejudice to further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: In March, 1963, defendant after conviction of forgery and grand larceny was sentenced as a fourth felony offender. Before an appeal from the judgment of conviction had been heard one of the predicate felonies was declared invalid and in December, 1963, he was resenteneed as a third offender. In 1964 this court affirmed the original judgment of conviction (22 A D 2d 1016). The petition in this *coram nobis*proceeding commenced in December, 1965 and denied without a hearing alleges that at the time of resentence defendant’s expressed desire to challenge the validity of the remaining predicate convie*643tions was denied; that no appeal had been filed after the resentence; that the court has never reviewed the resentencing proceedings and he now seeks to be resentenced so that he may file a timely appeal to raise the issues concerning the two predicate felonies. Upon the oral argument counsel for appellant stated that defendant is actually seeking to challenge the constitutionality of the two prior out of State convictions. He recognized, however, that the petition fails to adequately assert grounds for such relief. Prior to 1964 there was no procedure under Hew York laws for challenging the constitutionality of out of State convictions as a predicate for multiple offender treatment. *(People*v. *Wilson,*13 N Y 2d 277; *People*v. *McCullough,*300 N. Y. 107.) Section 1943 of the Penal Law as amended in 1964 now requires our courts to give relief when it appears that a defendant’s previous out of State conviction was obtained in violation of his constitutional rights. *(People*v. *Machado,*17 N Y 2d 440.) The proper procedure for challenging such convictions is to make an application for resentence upon a petition reciting the facts supported by available affidavits and records from the foreign State. *(People*v. *Cornish,*21 A D 280.) (Appeal from order of Oneida County Court denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate judgment of conviction for forgery, second degree, grand larceny and petit larceny rendered December 30, 1963.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Del Vecehio and Marsh, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Share with Youth: Federal Internship Portal      

# Share with Youth: Federal Internship Portal

This portal is regularly updated with federal internship opportunities for students. Young people can use the portal to identify paid and unpaid internships in agencies across the federal government. **Learn more.**
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: What Youth Say About Their Reentry Needs      

# Resource: What Youth Say About Their Reentry Needs

This article highlights a recent webinar where youth spoke candidly about their needs when reentering their communities after confinement in residential facilities. The article also explores panelists’ suggestions on how to better prepare system-involved youth for life in their communities.**Learn more.**
(February 6, 1967)

#### Dolores L. Ambrose, Respondent, v. Wurlitzer Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dat'ed July 29, 1966 and entered in Suffolk County, modified by providing that the examination proceed at the courthouse of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The examination shall proceed at a time within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, as specified in a 10-day written notice, or at any other time and place as may be mutually agreed upon by written stipulation. In our opinion it was an improvident exercise of discretion to direct that appellant, over its objection, be examined at the offices of plaintiff’s attorney. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Rabin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Altra Industrial Motion, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Wall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,(“Section 906”) that to the best of my knowledge:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended,;and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.       Date: May 15, 2007 By: Name: /s/ David Wall David Wall    Title: Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1450.211 BCAP contract. ( a ) In order to enroll land in BCAP, the participant must enter into a contract with CCC.
( b ) The contract is comprised of: ( 1 ) The terms and conditions for participation in BCAP;
( 2 ) The conservation plan, forest stewardship plan, or equivalent plan; and
( 3 ) Any other materials or agreements determined necessary by CCC.
( c ) In order to enter into a contract, the producer must submit an offer to participate as specified in § 1450.209;
( d ) The contract must, within the dates established by CCC, be signed by: ( 1 ) The producer; and
( 2 ) The owners of the eligible land to be placed in the BCAP and other eligible participants, if applicable.
( e ) The Deputy Administrator is authorized to approve contracts on behalf of CCC.
( f ) CCC will honor contracts even in the event that a project area biomass conversion facility does not become fully or partially operational.
( g ) Contracts may be terminated by CCC before the full term of the contract has expired if: ( 1 ) The owner loses control of or transfers all or part of the acreage under contract and the new owner does not wish to continue the contract;
( 2 ) The participant voluntarily requests in writing to terminate the contract and obtains the approval of CCC according to terms and conditions as determined by CCC;
( 3 ) The participant is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract;
( 4 ) The BCAP practice fails or is not established after a certain time period, as determined by CCC, and the cost of restoring or establishing the practice outweighs the benefits received from the restoration or establishment;
( 5 ) The contract was approved based on erroneous eligibility determinations; or
( 6 ) CCC determines that such a termination is needed in the public interest.
( h ) Except as allowed and approved by CCC where the new owner of land enrolled in BCAP is a Federal agency that agrees to abide by the terms and conditions of the terminated contract, the participant in a contract that has been terminated must refund all or part of the payments made with respect to the contract plus interest, as determined by CCC, and must pay liquidated damages as provided for in the contract and this part. CCC may permit the amount(s) to be repaid to be reduced to the extent that such a reduction will not impair the purposes of BCAP. Further, a refund of all payments need not be required from a participant who is otherwise in full compliance with the contract when the land is purchased by or for the United States, as determined appropriate by CCC.
[75 FR 66234, Oct. 27, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 10575, Feb. 27, 2015]
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*PETER KAY

(AC 22998)

Foti, Schaller and McLachlan, Js.

Submitted on briefs October 16

officially released December 2, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.