alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1450.201 Project area proposal submission requirements. ( a ) To be considered for selection as a project area, a project sponsor must submit a proposal to CCC that includes, at a minimum: ( 1 ) A description of the sources of renewable biomass, eligible land, and eligible crops that may be enrolled within the proposed project area;
( 2 ) A letter of commitment from a biomass conversion facility stating that the facility will use, for BCAP purposes, eligible crops intended to be produced in the proposed project area;
( 3 ) Information demonstrating that the biomass conversion facility has or will have sufficient equity available to operate if the facility is not operational at the time the project area proposal is submitted; and
( 4 ) Any other information that gives CCC a reasonable assurance that the biomass conversion facility will be in operation in a timely manner so that it will use the eligible crops, as determined by CCC.
( b ) The project area description required in paragraph (a) of this section needs to specify geographic boundaries and be described in definite terms such as acres, watershed boundaries, mapped longitude and latitude coordinates, or counties.
( c ) The project area needs to be physically located near a biomass conversion facility or facilities, as determined by CCC.
( d ) Project area proposals may limit the nature and types of eligible crops to be established within a project area.
[75 FR 66234, Oct. 27, 2010, as amended at 80 FR 10574, Feb. 27, 2015]
Exhibit 10.25.2


 


PETROTECH
ENGINEERING LTD.


7536
Manzanita Place, Burnaby, B. C., Canada V3N 4X1 Phone: (604) 525 6896


Email:
johnyu@axion.net


 


March
29, 2013


 


CONSENT
OF PETROTECH ENGINEERING LTD.


 


We consent to
the references to our firm in the form and context in which they appear in the Form 10-K of Osage Exploration and Development,
Inc. (the “Report”). We hereby further consent to the inclusion in this Report
of estimates of oil and gas reserves contained in our report entitled:


 


Evaluation
of the Interests of Osage Exploration and Development, Inc. in the Guaduas Field in
the Middle/Upper Magdalena Valley, Onshore Colombia


 


and
to the inclusion of our report dated March 28, 2013 as an exhibit to the Report for the year ended 12/31/2012.


 


Signed
and Dated March 29, 2013 in the City of Burnaby, British Columbia


 


	/s/
    John Yu	 


John
Yu, P. Eng.


President
of Petrotech Engineering Ltd.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0001017

29-JAN-2016

10:30 AM
#### § 15b.17 Discrimination prohibited.

No qualified handicapped person shall, because a recipient's facilities are inaccessible to or unusuable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving assistance from this Department.
EXHIBIT 21

                   KANEB PIPE LINE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
                                 SUBSIDIARY LIST



           KANEB PIPE LINE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
               Support Terminal Operating Partnership, L.P.
                  ST Services Ltd
                                 ST Eastham Ltd.
                  ST Linden Terminal, LLC
                  ST/Center Chillicothe Terminal LLC
               Support Terminal Services, Inc.
                  StanTrans, Inc.
                             StanTrans Holding, Inc.
                            StanTrans Partners, L.P.
               Shore Terminals LLC
               Kaneb Pipe Line Holding Company LLC
                  Statia Marine, Inc.
                  Statia Technology, Inc.
                  Statia Terminals Delaware, Inc.
                    Statia Terminals, Inc.
                    Statia Terminals New Jersey, Inc.
                    Seven Seas Steamship Company, Inc.
                      Seven Seas Steamship Company NV
                  Statia Terminals International NV
                    Statia Terminals Corporation NV
                      Statia Terminals Canada, Inc.
                        Point Tupper Marine Services LTD
                      Statia Terminals Canada  Holdings, Inc.
                        Statia Terminals Canada Partnership
                    Statia Terminals Antilles NV
                      Saba Trustcompany NV
                      Bicen Development Corporation NV
                      Statia Terminals NV
                        Statia Laboratory Services NV
                        Statia Tugs NV
NO. 07-11-0301-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

OCTOBER 26, 2011

______________________________

ALFRED LEE STONE, APPELLANT

V.

DAVID L. GLEASON, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 99,684-A; HONORABLE DAN L. SCHAAP, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

****Appellant, Alfred Lee Stone, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed this appeal from the trial court's order dismissing his suit against Appellee, the Honorable David L. Gleason, on the ground that his pleadings failed to state a cause of action that had an arguable basis in law or fact.  On August 4, 2011, Stone filed a motion to withdraw his notice of appeal asserting it had been filed by "accident or mistake."  We dismiss this appeal.

	Stone asserts he filed a notice of appeal to avoid default because he was uncertain whether the trial court clerk had received and filed his "mandatory reinstatement on motion for new trial."  By letter dated August 11, 2011, this Court notified Stone of the consequences of his request to withdraw his notice of appeal and directed him to confirm the withdrawal of the notice of appeal before September 12, 2011.  This Court also noted that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the appeal.  

	To date, Stone has not communicated with this Court regarding this appeal.  Consequently, we grant his motion to withdraw his notice of appeal, and dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction, want of prosecution and failure to comply with a notice from the Clerk of this Court.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b) and (c). 

							Patrick A. Pirtle

							      Justice

2
February 7, 1980.

Appeal No. 78-278.

#### Rita A. Morgan *v.*Victor Morgan.

Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.

*Capalbo é- Capalbo, Thomas J. Capalbo, Jr.,*for petitioner, *Nardone, Turo ér Naccarato, Vincent J. Naccarato,*for respondent.

At the direction of this Court, the parties appeared to show cause why both the appeal and cross appeal should not be dismissed. We affirm the judgment below in light of the fact that on the basis of the evidence in the record the Family Court justice did not err or abuse his discretion by incorporating the agreement in the divorce decree and awarding the wife counsel fees.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1427.7 Maturity of MALs. ( a ) ( 1 ) Form A loans and Form G loans mature on demand by CCC and no later than the last day of the 9th calendar month following the month in which the note and security agreement is approved as specified in § 1427.5(a).
( 2 ) CCC may at any time accelerate the loan maturity date by providing the producer notice of such acceleration at least 30 days in advance of the accelerated maturity date.
( b ) If the loan is not repaid by the loan maturity date, title to the cotton will vest in CCC the day after such maturity date and CCC will have no obligation to pay for any market value which such cotton may have in excess of the amount of the loan, plus interest and charges.
( c ) Following written notice by CCC to the producer and warehouse operator, CCC may advance the maturity date of cotton pledged as collateral for a MAL if: ( 1 ) CCC determines such loan cotton collateral is improperly warehoused and subject to damage,
( 2 ) Any term of the producer's loan agreement is violated, or
( 3 ) Carrying charges are substantially in excess of the average of carrying charges available elsewhere and the storing warehouse, after notice, declines to reduce such charges.
( d ) CCC will not assume a loss on MAL collateral stored in a warehouse for any reason.
( e ) The maturity date of any MAL may not be extended.
[67 FR 64459, Oct. 18, 2002, as amended at 73 FR 65720, Nov. 5, 2008; 80 FR 133, 139, Jan. 2, 2015]
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION




I, Yijun
Wang, certify that:




1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Jpak Group,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c) disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date: September 22,
2008




/s/
      Yijun WangYijun
      WangChief
      Executive Officer, President, Director (Principal Executive
      Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1
   CERTIFICATION
        OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350, AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I,
        JianPing Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of AGA Resources, Inc., certify
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        the
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March
        31,
        2006 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AGA Resources,
        Inc.
   
 
 Dated:
                  August
                  9, 2006
                
                /s/ JianPing
                  ZhangJianPing
                Zhang,Chief
                Executive Officer
  
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to AGA  Resources,
        Inc.and will
        be
        retained by AGA  Resources,
        Inc. and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Commerce (“the Department”) published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 28, 2010, concerning the initiation of administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with September anniversary dates. The document contained incorrect information in both the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings table.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         November 10, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sheila E. Forbes, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Unit, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4697.

## Backgound

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of October 28, 2010, 75 FR 66349, under the tables entitled “Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,” we note that the Department inadvertently listed the exporter names: Asia Pacific CIS (Wuxi) Co., Ltd., Asia Pacific CIS (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Hengtong Hardware Manufacturing (Huizhou) Co., Ltd., Taiwan Rail Company, and King Shan Wire Co., Ltd. under case numbers A-570-941 and C-570-942. For reasons explained in footnote #'s 5 & 6 in the October 28, 2010                         **Federal Register**                         notice, the Department retracts its initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order and the countervailing duty order with respect to the above referenced company names for case numbers A-570-941 and C-570-942 for the period of review 09/01/09 through 08/31/10.                    

Dated: November 4, 2010.

Susan H. Kuhbach,

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.

[FR Doc. 2010-28408 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Rule 497(e)Registration No. 002-304471940 Act File No. 811-01728



|NICHOLAS FUND, INC.
|-------------------

SUPPLEMENT DATED JUNE 26, 2009

TO THE PROSPECTUS AND STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, EACH DATED JULY 31, 2008 OF



|Nicholas Fund, Inc.
|-------------------

THIS SUPPLEMENT UPDATES THE PROSPECTUS AND STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ AND KEEP IT TOGETHER WITH YOUR COPY OF THE PROSPECTUS AND STATEMENT OFADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR FUTURE REFERENCE

This Supplement updates certain information contained in the above-referenced Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information of Nicholas Fund, Inc. On June 25, 2009, a majority of the shareholders of Nicholas Liberty Fund approved a plan to liquidate and dissolve the Nicholas Liberty Fund. The liquidation is expected to occur on June 26, 2009.

Accordingly, effective as of June 26, 2009, all references to Nicholas Liberty Fund in the Prospectus and Statement of Additional Information are hereby deleted.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ForgeHouse, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, John Britchford-Steel, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ John Britchford-SteelJohn
      Britchford-SteelChief
      Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 4865** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. NKHENGE SHROPSHIRE, a/k/a Konjay Shropshire , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 3:13

- cr - 00248

- FDW

- 1 )

Submitted : June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tony E. Rollman, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jill Westmoreland Rose, Acting United States Attorney, Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Nkhenge Shropshire pled guilty to conspiracy to impede the Internal Revenue Service, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2012), and making a false statement on a loan application, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1014 (2012). With Shropshire’s consent, a magistrate judge conducted a Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing and accepted her guilty pleas. Shropshire argues on appeal that the ma gistrate judge lacked the authority to accept her guilty pleas. Because there is binding Fourth Circuit precedent to the contrary, we affirm. The sole issue Shropshire raises on appeal is that , in accepting her guilty pleas, the magistrate judge exceeded the authority vested in him un der the Federal Magistrates Act . Central to Shropshire’s argument is the recent decision in United States v. Harden , 758 F.3d 886 (7th Cir. 2014), in which the Seventh Circuit held “that the magistrate jud ge’s acceptance of [defendant]’s guilty plea violated the Federal Magistrates Act.” Id. at 891. T his court has held , however, that the Magistrates Act authorizes magistrate judges to accept a guilty plea and find a defendant guilty when, as here, “the parties have consente d to the procedure” and the district court retains “ultimate control

. . . over the plea process.” United States v. Benton , 523 F.3d 424, 433 (4th Cir. 2008) ; cf. Harden , 758 F.3d at 891 (noting that3 Fourth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits “authorize magistrate judges to accept felon y guilty pleas with the parties’ consent”). Regardless of the Seventh Circuit’s contrary decision in Harden , we are bound by Benton

. See United States v. Collins , 415 F.3d 304, 311 (4th Cir. 2005) (“A decision of a panel of this court becomes the law of the circuit and is binding on other panels unless it is overruled by a subsequent en banc opinion of this court or a superseding contrary decision of the Supreme Court.” (inter nal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we reject Shropshire’s challenge to the magistrate judge’s authority to accept her guilty pleas , and we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Brampton Crest
International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period
ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brad Hacker, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.





By:
                          /s/ Brad HackerBrad
      HackerChief
      Financial Officer
                            
                            May
      15,
2009





32