alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Daniel Jakubowicz, Appellant, v Dunkirk Urban Renewal Agency, Inc., Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and application granted. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from the denial at Special Term of his application for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. His claim is for damages stemming from injuries he received on July 28, 1978 while working at a construction site owned by respondent in Dunkirk, New York, when four steel beams collapsed and fell upon pe*1020titioner and three other workmen. Petitioner was hospitalized for several weeks and disabled for five months. He states that he did not know that he had a claim against respondent until he retained counsel in February, 1979. The application for leave to serve a late notice of claim was served on respondent on May 14, 1979. In support of his assertion that respondent had actual knowledge of the incident shortly after it occurred and had an opportunity to make a full investigation, petitioner alleges that the Dunkirk police thoroughly investigated the incident and that the accident received substantial publicity and was widely reported in local newspapers. Attached to petitioner’s attorney’s affidavit is a copy of an article appearing with a photograph and a two-column headline on the front page of the *DunkirkFredonia Evening Observer*on July 29, 1978 (one day after the occurrence) which contains the names and addresses of the four injured workmen, the names of several Dunkirk policemen who investigated the accident, the location of the accident site, and a description of how the accident occurred. Also attached is an article which appeared on an inside page of the April 4, 1979 edition of the *Evening Observer*stating that the City of Dunkirk and respondent expected to be named as defendants in a lawsuit arising from the incident and that respondent had retained counsel in anticipation thereof. Respondent does not deny these allegations and does not contend that it did not receive actual notice of the accident at the time it occurred. Nor does it set forth any facts to support its conclusory claim of prejudice arising from the delay. Thus, we conclude that respondent did acquire actual knowledge of the essential facts of the claim shortly after the incident and was not prejudiced by the delay (see *Matter of Beary v City of Rye,*44 NY2d 398, 407-408; *Hutchins v Village of Tupper Lake Housing Auth.,*72 AD2d 875; *Segreto v Town of Oyster Bay,*66 AD2d 796; *Hubbard v County of Suffolk,*65 AD2d 567; cf. *Matter of Ziecker v Town of Orchard Park,*70 AD2d 422). Under these circumstances, it was an abuse of discretion to deny petitioner’s application for leave to file a late notice of claim. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—notice of claim.) Present— Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RAYMOND STRONG

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 41

LT Case No. 2016

- 300822

- CFDB

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Decision filed November 1, 2022

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Volusia County

, Sandra C. Upchurch , Judge.

Raymond Strong, Bonifay, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Allison L. Morris,

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS

, EDWARDS and HARRIS , JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: SAFE Family Support Locator      

# Resource: SAFE Family Support Locator

This free tool helps families and caregivers quickly find addiction treatment services and support for their loved ones. The tool allows individuals to search a nation-wide database of traditional treatment centers as well as support services for the family or friends of those struggling with addiction. Available in English and Spanish. **Learn more.**
§ 1484.32 Employment practices. ( a ) A Cooperator shall enter into written contracts with all overseas employees who are paid in whole or in part with project funds and shall ensure that all terms, conditions, and related formalities of such contracts conform to governing local law.
( b ) A Cooperator shall, in its overseas offices, conform its office hours, work week, and holidays to local law and to the custom generally observed by U.S. commercial entities in the local business community.
( c ) A Cooperator may pay salaries or fees in any currency (U.S. or foreign) in conformance with contract specifications. Cooperators should consult local laws regarding currency restrictions.
Nicor
Inc.


Form 10-K


Exhibit
23.01








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-1732, 33-31029, 333-107377, 333-107375, 333-28699 and 333-140866 on Form S-8
of our report, dated February 25, 2009, relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Nicor Inc. (which expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to a change, in 2007, in
the method of recognizing and measuring income tax positions, and a change, in
2008, in the method of offsetting amounts related to certain contracts), and the
effectiveness of Nicor Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
  /s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





Chicago,
Illinois


February
25, 2009
#### § 15.63 Computation of time.

A period of time begins with the day following the act or event and includes the last day of the period, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday observed in the District of Columbia, in which case it shall be the following workday. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is less than 7 days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays shall be excluded from the computation.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1430.200 Applicability.

(a) This subpart governs the Milk Income Loss Contract Program. This program provides financial assistance to dairy operations in connection with milk production that is sold in the commercial market.
Adak Community Development Corporation 

March 17th 2015 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer 

Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Dept. of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

 Washington DC, 20590 

RE: DOT-OST-2000-8556- Continuation of Alaska Airlines EAS Service at Adak, Alaska 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer, 

This letter is to express strong support for Alaska Airlines being selected to continue to 

provide essential air service using jet aircraft to our community. 

Adak Community Development Corporation (ACDC) is a non-profit community 

organization devoted to promoting seafood harvesting and processing capacity in Adak. 

ACDC has invested in seafood infrastructure in Adak that is extremely dependant on 

the type and reliability of service provided by Alaska Airlines. 

We have reviewed the proposal for provision of Essential Air Service and firmly believe 

that Alaska Airlines is the best value. 

 The service Alaska Airlines is currently providing is critical for the continued access 

and economic well being of Adak as well as that of this entire region of the state. 

The existing pattern of service – using jet aircraft – offers important benefits that would 

be difficult, if not impossible, to match with any other type of service or aircraft type: 

 Route network / ease of connections – Alaska Airlines route system now stretches 

coast to coast and marketing partnerships with other carriers provide virtually a 

global reach. Service from our community to the hub in Anchorage provides easy 

access to this network. 

 Incoming freight capabilities – Our community depends on scheduled air freight 

shipments for many of our daily necessities and the added cargo capacity of Alaska’s 
“combi” aircraft is extremely important. Additionally, our economic base is closely 

tied to commercial fishing. 

 Outgoing freight capabilities - Alaska’s jet service offers key cargo capacity allowing 

transport of 10,000 lbs or more of fresh seafood products to the rest of the U.S. in a 

timely, dependable manner. ACDC is involved in shipping live crab and fresh 

halibut out of Adak on Alaska Airlines, and this marketing channel has been critical 

to our local fleet. 

Given the lack of any road system connecting our extremely remote community with the 

rest of the state, Adak is particularly isolated. Accordingly, ACDC and the other 

participants in the seafood industry are extremely dependent on reliable air access. 

Alaska Airlines has provided this access very capably for the many years. 

For these reasons, we respectfully urge DOT to select Alaska Airlines for continued 

essential air service to Adak. 

Thank you for your consideration of our comments. 

Sincerely, 

Adak Community Development Corporation 

P.O. Box 1943 

Adak AK, 99546
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Datawatch Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alan R. MacDougall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                 /s/ Alan R. MacDougall
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Alan R. MacDougall
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 December 24, 2003
#### William F. Connery, appellee, v. J. W. McCormack Company, Inc., appellant.

Gen. No. 33,368.

Opinion filed May 31, 1929.

S. G. Lee, for appellant; Edgar Bernhard, of counsel. Joseph M. Connery and J. J. Cooke, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Seanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 186]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ186.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 294]]

Public Law 109-186
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
105 NW Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, as the ``John J. Hainkel, 
   Jr. Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Mar. 20, 2006 -  [H.R. 2346]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 105 NW 
Railroad Avenue in Hammond, Louisiana, shall be known and designated as 
the ``John J. Hainkel, Jr. Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John J. Hainkel, Jr. Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved March 20, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2346:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    June 27, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Mar. 3, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Castle Arch Real Estate Investment Company, L.L.C. a California limited liability company (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I, Kirby D. Cochran, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:



a.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



b.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kirby D. Cochran

Kirby D. Cochran, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



Dated March 15, 2006
#### § 160.7 Gum spirits of turpentine.

The designation “gum spirits of turpentine” shall refer to the kind of spirits of turpentine obtained by distillation of the oleoresin (gum) from living trees, and commonly known prior to the passage of the act as gum spirits, gum turpentine, spirits of turpentine, or oil of turpentine.
§ 15f.24 When and in what form will a final determination be made on my complaint by USDA? ( a ) The ALJ will make a proposed determination orally at the close of a hearing, or in writing within 35 days. The ALJ may recommend dismissal of your complaint on the basis of a finding that it is not an eligible complaint; recommend denial of your eligible complaint on the merits; or make a proposed finding of discrimination on your eligible complaint and recommend to award you such relief as would be afforded under the applicable statute or regulation under which the eligible complaint was filed. The proposed determination will become the final determination 35 days after it is made, unless you request review of the proposed determination by the ASCR. The ASCR also may review the proposed determination on his or her own initiative. If the ASCR reviews the proposed determination, he or she will allow the parties a reasonable opportunity to file briefs in support or opposition to the proposed determination, and afterwards file a final determination within 35 days after you request review of the proposed determination.
( b ) To the maximum extent practicable, a final determination will be filed within 180 days after you filed your Section 741 Complaint Request.
[63 FR 67394, Dec. 4, 1998, as amended at 68 FR 27449, May 20, 2003]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: The State of School Diversity in the United States      

# Report: The State of School Diversity in the United States

This report (PDF, 16 pages) highlights the current state of school diversity, summarizes the ongoing challenges, and discusses federal opportunities to support state and local efforts to foster diversity in schools and classrooms. This document also provides a historical context of racial segregation and desegregation efforts, empirical research on longstanding resource inequity, and information on the value of expanding opportunities for local educational agencies (LEAs) to increase school diversity.**Learn more** (PDF, 16 pages).
y



### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 13

- 00283

- CR

JACOB MATTHEW BARBER , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

Appeal from the 258th District Court of Polk County. (Tr. Ct. No. 22,374).

TO THE 258TH DISTRICT COURT OF POLK COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 24th day of March 2015, the case upon appeal to revise

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed

by the trial court on February 7, 2013. After submitting the

case on the appellate record and the arguments properly

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s

judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court

affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered Mar ch 24, 2015.Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown

and Lloyd. Opinion delivered by Justice Lloyd.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, an d executed.

June 5 , 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS RSS-8 BIOME-BGC SSA Simulation of Annual Water and Carbon FluxesThe BOREAS RSS-8 team performed research to evaluate the effect of seasonal weather and landcover heterogeneity on boreal forest regional water and carbon fluxes using a process-level ecosystem model, BIOME-BGC, coupled with remote sensing-derived parameter maps of key state variables. This data set contains derived maps of landcover type and crown and stem biomass as model inputs to determine annual evapotranspiration, gross primary production, autotrophic respiration, and net primary productivity within the BOREAS SSA-MSA, at a 30-m spatial resolution. Model runs were conducted over a 3-year period from 1994-1996; images are provided for each of those years. The data are stored in binary image format. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010004616Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Nickeson, Jaime*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Kimball, John*(Montana Univ. Missoula, MT United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209891/VOL55NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL55Rept-2000-03136-0/VOL55Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010004616.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024