alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1466.34 Award determinations. ( a ) A peer review panel evaluates completed applications based on the application evaluation criteria that address announced national or State program priorities.
( b ) The peer review panel forwards compiled application evaluations to a Grant Review Board (Board).
( c ) The Board reviews the peer review panel evaluations and considers review comments from State Conservationists. The Board then makes recommendations for awards to the Chief, who makes final selections.
( d ) The NRCS National Headquarters makes a grant or cooperative agreement award after the Chief selects a grantee and the grantee agrees to the terms and conditions of the NRCS grant or cooperative agreement document.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Palomine
Mining Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended July 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer, and the principal
accounting and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Palomine
Mining Inc.


Date: September 14, 2007               /s/  Frank H. Ward
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Frank H. Ward, Chief Executive Officer,
                                       President, Treasurer and chief accounting
                                       and financial officer
EXHIBIT 4.16

 

[Letterhead of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP

 

April 2, 2013

 

Securities and Exchange Commission 
 100 F Street, N.E.
 Washington, D.C. 20549-7561

 

Dear Sirs/Madams:

 

We have read Item 16F of Form 20-F of Trina Solar Limited (“Trina Solar”) for the year ended December 31, 2012, which Trina Solar expects to file on or about April 2, 2013, and have the following comments:

 

1.             We agree with the statements made in the first sentence of paragraph 1 and paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of Item 16F for which we have a basis on which to comment on, and we agree with, the disclosures.

 

2.             We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with the statements made in sentences 2 and 3 of paragraph 1 or the paragraph 5 of Item 16F.

 

 

Yours sincerely,

 

/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: What Works Fact Sheet: Violence Prevention      

# Resource: What Works Fact Sheet: Violence Prevention

This two-page summary (PDF, 2 pages) features an easy-to-read table that shows Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) recommendations and findings for evaluated violence intervention approaches. It may be viewed online or printed as a handout, making it useful for communications with decision makers and partners. **Learn more.**
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0753

SAT Date: 8/2/2013

Print Date: 8/30/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 1 PMN

3 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ; Hyd Pdt negl

Keywords:

 Keywords: MUTA; SENS-L,S; IRR-L,MM
Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0753

FATE: MW = Solid with MP > 80 C (E)S = ReactsHydrolysis half-life = hr-daVP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)BP > 400 C (E)H < 1.00E-8 (E)POTW removal (%) = PMN 90-99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 90 via sorptionTime for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt > moSorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt v.strongPBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P3B1*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Hyd Pdt negl

 Health: Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes as the neat material (pchem); poor all routes fo

 if in solution (pchem); expected to react, especially in the lung. Concer

based on ; respiratory and dermal sensitization and lung and mucous membrane irritation based on the 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured C

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish 

_

chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic value *

algal _ chronic value *

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _
Sewage Sludge _ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR chemical class = pol

solid; S = reacts with water at 20 C (P); pH7; effective concent

100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; DW hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC <2

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern (ppb) *

SARs nonionic polymers

SAR Class polymer-nonionic

Ecotox Category Nonionic Polymers

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHANTEL LOTASHA COLEMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-79 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 30, 2015. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Pat Siracusa, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Brooke Elvington, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders 1 appeal, Chantel Coleman appeals her convictions and sentences in three cases. We affirm without prejudice to any r ight Coleman may have to file a postconviction motion raising the claims she raised i n her motion to withdraw

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).- 2 - plea filed after this appeal was initiated. The trial court pr operly dismissed the motion because this appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction to consider the motion. See Sharp v. State, 884 So. 2d 510, 512 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Wilson v. State, 814 So. 2d 1203, 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

We remand for correction of a scrivener's error on the writte n judgment in

circuit court case number 14-5604. The judgment lists the offe nse as "GRAND THEFT 3F" and correctly cites section 812.014(2)(c)(1), but it incorr ectly lists the degree as a "First Degree Felony." Coleman was charged with third-degree g rand theft in violation of section 812.014(2)(c)(1), Florida Statutes (2014), which "is grand theft of the third degree and a felony of the third degree." Accordingly, the jud gment in circuit court case

number 14-5604 should be amended to r eflect that the offense ofgrand theft is a thirddegree felony. Affirmed; remanded.

ALTENBERND, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 10.4


                AMENDMENT TO RICHARDS BAY SLAG SALES AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDING  AGREEMENT  dated May 1, 1999 is made by and between  RICHARDS BAY
IRON AND  TITANIUM  (PROPRIETARY)  LIMITED,  a South  African  corporation  with
offices at Richards  Bay,  Natal,  South Africa  (hereafter  called  "RBIT") and
KRONOS INC., a Delaware  corporation with offices at P.O. Box 700, Wyckoffs Mill
Road, Hightstown, New Jersey, 08520, USA (hereafter called "Buyer").

WHEREAS,  RBIT and Buyer  entered into an agreement for the purchase and sale of
titanium  bearing  slag  produced at RBIT's plant at Richards  Bay,  Natal South
Africa  (hereafter  "RBIT  Product")  dated  as of the 1st day of May,  1995 and
amended as of November 3, 1997 (hereafter called the "Agreement");

WHEREAS,  the parties wish to amend the Agreement to provide for the extension
of the Term of the Agreement;

NOW THEREFORE,  for and in consideration of the covenants and conditions  herein
contained,  the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement effective January 1,
1999 as follows:

1.    Article III shall be replaced with the following:

      This Agreement shall be in effect for a term of nine (9) years  commencing
      on January 1, 1995 up to and  including  December  31, 2003 (the  "Term"),
      subject to prior termination as hereinafter provided.

2.    The first sentence of Paragraph D of Article IV of the Agreement  shall be
      replaced by the following:

      [***]

3.    The last sentence of Paragraph D of Article IV of the  Agreement  shall be
      replaced with the following:

      [***]

4.    [***]

5.    Article V.A.3. shall be replaced with the following:

      "3.   For 1997 to 2003 inclusively,  the Basic Price of RB Slag shall be
            the  previous   year's  Basic  Price  plus  Escalation  as  herein
            defined."

[***] - Confidential treatment requested.
<PAGE>

6.    The parties  hereby  ratify and confirm  the terms and  conditions  of the
      Agreement not specifically amended pursuant to this Amending Agreement.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  parties  have caused this  Amending  Agreement  to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives.

RICHARDS BAY IRON AND TITANIUM                 KRONOS INC.
(PROPRIETARY) LIMITED


By:  /s/ K. C. Rumble                          By:  /s/ D. C. Weaver
Name:  K. C. Rumble                            Name:  D. C. Weaver
Title:  Managing Director                      Title:  V.P. Business Development















[***] - Confidential treatment requested.
#### William E. Harris, defendant in error, v. Catherine Bell, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 8,273.

Opinion filed January 24, 1929.

W. St. J. Wines and J. A. Bloomingston, for plaintiff in error. George C. Dixon and Murphy & Hemphill; for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.
EXHIBIT
      32.3




**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        966 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of HydroGen Corporation on Form 10-KSB
        for the
        year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I Scott M. Schecter
        Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
  1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March
                30, 2006
              By:
              /s/ Scott
                M.
                SchecterChief
                Financial Officer
  This
        Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section
        18 of the Securities Act 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
        of
        1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
        irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
        A
        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to HydroGen Corporation and will be retained by HydroGen Corporation
        and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
181 So. 431

#### HULETT v. GILBERT.

No. 34770.

May 2, 1938.

Louis H. Yarrut and Sydney J. Parlongue, both of New Orleans, for appellant.

Joseph Rosenberg, of New Orleans, for appellee.

ROGERS, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment awarding her alimony at the rate of $75 a month contemporaneously with a judgment of separation from bed and board.

The parties have been married for eighteen years. This is plaintiff’s second marriage. By her first marriage she has a daughter who is employed as a stenographer in the city of Washington. There is no issue of her second marriage.

Defendant is the office manager of the Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, in the city of New Orleans. At the time suit was brought his salary was $316 a month. At the time of the hearing, his salary had been increased to $335 a month. But since the- appeal was taken his salary has been decreased to $280 a month.

A rule by defendant to have the alimony reduced from $75 to $50 a month, because of the reduction in his salary, was denied by the trial judge. By agreement of counsel the proceedings on this rule were made *879a part of this record to be considered herein, without the necessity of another appeal.

Plaintiff contends that in view of the social circle in which she moves and the poor state of her health, $75 a month is not sufficient for her needs and is not proportionate to the defendant’s income. Hence, plaintiff contends that the alimony award should be increased to an amount equal to one-third of defendant’s monthly salary. .

Defendant, on his part, contends that he is considerably in debt for loans obtained from various parties on which he is making regular monthly payments; that he is under certain expenses incidental to his employment and also other expenses and obligations, which reduce his gross income considerably ; and, in addition thereto, that he is the sole support of his aged mother and contributes monthly towards her main- ■ tenance. Defendant further contends that the condition 'of plaintiff's health is not such as to require her to visit her physician more than once a month for observation at a nominal cost.

The amount to be awarded as alimony pendente lite is largely within the discretion of the trial judge. When exercised fairly- and without abuse it will not be ordinarily interfered with on appeal.

After considering the evidence produced by the parties in support of their respective contentions, the trial judge fix.ed the alimony demanded by plaintiff at $75 a month. In doing so, -he obviously considered that the amount awarded was sufficient for plaintiff’s support and was proportionate to defendant’s means. In this we do not find that he acted unfairly or that he abused his discretion. Hence, we see no reason to disturb his judgment.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment, appealed from is affirmed.

O’NIELL, C. J., does not take part.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1412.68 Controlled substance violations.

The provisions of part 718 of this title apply to this part.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
              -----------------------------------------------------

                   CHASE CREDIT CARD OWNER TRUST SERIES 2000-3

             ------------------------------------------------------



         The undersigned, an Authorized Officer of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, as Administrator pursuant to the Indenture for the Chase
Credit Card Owner Trust Series 2000-3 does hereby certify that:

                  1. The undersigned is an Authorized Officer pursuant to the
                  Indenture to execute and deliver this Certificate to the
                  Indenture Trustee.

                  2. This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.9 of
                  the Indenture.

                  3. A review of the activities of the Issuer for the calendar
                  year ended December 31, 2001, and of performance under this
                  Indenture has been made under the supervision of the
                  undersigned.

                  4. To the best of the undersigned knowledge, based on such
                  review, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and
                  covenants in all material respects under this Indenture for
                  the calendar year ended December 31, 2001. No default in the
                  compliance of any such condition or covenant has occurred or
                  is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

                  5. The following is a description of each default in the
                  performance of the Issuer's obligations under the provisions
                  of the Indenture known to the undersigned to have been made
                  during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature
                  of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Issuer, if
                  any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
                  of each such default: NONE.


                                                  (signatures on following page)


<PAGE>





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 25th
day of March, 2002.

                                   By CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, National
                                   Association, as Administrator




                                   By:     /s/ Patricia M. Garvey
                                          -------------------------
                                   Name:  Patricia M. Garvey
                                   Title: Vice President
#### The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Benjamin M. Jacobson, appellee, v. City of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,590.

Opinion filed December 31, 1929.

Samuel A. Ettelson, Corporation Counsel, for appellant; Samuel L. Golan and Cora B. Hirtzel, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel. No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Form 10-K of Andrx Corporation (the "Company") for the
year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Angelo C. Malahias, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                                Name:

                                                /s/ ANGELO C. MALAHIAS
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Angelo C. Malahias
                                                Senior Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer

                                                March 28, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Andrx Corporation and will be retained by Andrx Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.