alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Richard Rowles, Respondent, *v.*General Abrasive Company, Respondent, and Special Disability Fund, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal by the Special Disability Fund from a board decision charging it with liability under the provisions of subdivision 8 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant, a laborer, sustained a back injury on July 16, 1959. Upon a pre-employment physical examination conducted in May of 1959, Dr. Eddy, the examining physician, noted in his report with respect to claimant’s back, “ Spine back, flexion off 15%.” The report, however, did not indicate whether this condition was permanent .and there is no evidence that Dr. Eddy made any other communication to the employer concerning the condition, that “ Spine hack, flexion off 15% ” played any part in the decision to hire claimant or that claimant was put on any sort of light work. Dr. Eddy testified in 1963, that he considered the pre-existing condition was permanent in nature and that the 25% post-accident permanency was greater because of the preaceident condition, but he did not explain what the preaccident condition actually was beyond its symptomatology and admitted on cross-examination that claimant’s restricted ability to move could be partially due to his general obesity. Thus the record is devoid of any evidence of a definable medical back condition and more importantly that the employer considered any such condition in deciding to hire the claimant, and thus the board’s determination cannot stand *(Matter of La Count*v. *Kaufman,*23 A D 2d 614; cf., *Matter of Doroshenko*v. *General Motors Corp.,*20 A D 2d 744, mot. for lv. to app. den. 14 N Y 2d 483). Decision reversed and claim remitted for further proceedings, with costs to Special Disability Fund against respondent employer and self-insured employer. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           New Title I, Part D Data Collection Resource      

# New Title I, Part D Data Collection Resource

This **Instructional Guide to Reporting Title I, Part D Data in the Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) for School Year (SY) 2015-2016** provides the latest updates for the SY 2014–15 Title I, Part D data collection. It highlights the importance of the federal data collection process, provides details about the CSPR and the EDFacts initiative, and includes comprehensive reporting instructions.**​**

https://neglected-delinquent.ed.gov/resource/instructional-guide-reporting-title-i-part-d-data-cspr-sy-2015-16
Exhibit 99 (1)


                 NIAGARA MOHAWK PURSUING SALE OF NUCLEAR ASSETS
         SALE WOULD CONTINUE COMPANY'S DIVESTITURE OF GENERATING ASSETS

Syracuse, January 28 - Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (NYSE:NMK) today
announced plans to pursue the sale of its nuclear assets, the Nine Mile Point
Unit 1 nuclear plant and a 41 percent co-ownership of the Nine Mile Point Unit
2 nuclear plant.  The company said it is in discussions concerning a sale but
there can be no assurance that a transaction will occur.  The company does not
plan to make any further announcements on this matter until it signs a
definitive agreement or determines not to pursue a sale.

"The decision to pursue a sale of our nuclear assets is in line with our
strategic direction of building shareholder value by focusing on our core energy
delivery business," said William E. Davis, Niagara Mohawk's chairman and chief
executive officer.  "We believe the future of Nine Mile Point as a major
employer and economic force for our region will be well served by a sale to a
buyer interested in pursuing a nuclear strategy."

As a stipulation of a sale, Niagara Mohawk will require any buyer to accept the
current collective bargaining agreement with International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers Local 97 and will seek to maximize employment opportunities
for the existing workforce.  Niagara Mohawk has 1,350 employees at the nuclear
plants.

The approval of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, New York State Public Service Commission, and other regulatory
bodies would be required before the conclusion of any sale, a process which
would take 12 to18 months after the completion of an agreement with a buyer.
A sale of its nuclear assets would further Niagara Mohawk's divestiture from
electricity generation.  Niagara Mohawk has reached agreements to sell its
hydroelectric and coal facilities.  The company is currently pursuing the sale
of its oil/gas plants.

Niagara Mohawk is an investor-owned energy services company that provides
electricity to more than 1.5 million customers across 24,000 square miles of
Upstate New York.  The company also delivers natural gas to more than 500,000
customers over 4,500 square miles of eastern, central and northern New York.

Nine Mile 1 is a 613-megawatt boiling-water reactor.  Nine Mile 2, a
1,140-megawatt boiling-water reactor, is co-owned by: New York State Electric
and Gas Corp. (18 percent), Long Island Power Authority/LILCO (18 percent),
Rochester Gas and Electric Corp. (14 percent), and Central Hudson Gas and
Electric Corp. (9 percent).  Both plants are operated by Niagara Mohawk and
are located in Scriba, 35 miles north of Syracuse.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 60839 ) Under Contract No. W9124A-04-C-0011 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT: Brett W. Johnson, Esq.

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: Colin P. Ahler, Esq. Jason Ebe, Esq.

Snell & Wilmer LLP Phoenix, 

### AZ Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney Frank A. March, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 5 April 2017

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed
. Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60839, Appeal ofSulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FreightCar America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, John E. Carroll, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kevin
P. Bagby, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |  |  |                                                                   
|------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 11, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ John E. Carroll, Jr.                                          
|Date         |  |  |  | John E. Carroll, Jr., President andChief Executive Officer        
|             |  | 
|May 11, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Kevin P. Bagby                                                
|Date         |  |  |  | Kevin P. Bagby, Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer

A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



25
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) of TAC Acquisition Corp. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



/s/ Jonathan H. CohenName:

Jonathan H. CohenDate:

August 21, 2006
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–405 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H. CON. RES. 376, 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007 

APRIL 5, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 766] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 766, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H. Con. Res. 376, the 

Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2007, under 

a general debate rule. The rule provides four hours of general debate, with three hours equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget, and one hour on the subject of economic goals and policies 

equally divided and controlled by Representative Saxton of New 

Jersey and Representative Maloney of New York or their designees. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the concurrent resolution. 

Finally, the rule provides that after general debate the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion and no further consideration of the bill shall be in order except by a subsequent order 

of the House. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the concurrent resolution includes a waiver of clause 3 of rule XIII because 

the total of the Budget Committee rollcall vote No. 15 was incorrectly reported in H. Rept. 109–402. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
2 

OBLIGATIONS UNDER SEC. 301(c) of the congressional budget act 

The Committee notes that certain features of the concurrent resolution originated by the Committee on the Budget might constitute ‘procedure or matter which has the effect of changing any 

rule of the House’ within the meaning of section 301(c) of the Budget Act. The Committee has reviewed those features of the concurrent resolution in the course of originating this special order of 

business for its consideration by the House. The Committee believes that this review adequately meets the needs of the Committee and obviates any practical need to refer the concurrent resolution to the Committee. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
#### § 1230.615 Producer.

The term *Producer* means a person who produces porcine animals in the United States for sale in commerce.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1436.4 Application for loans. ( a ) An application for an FSFL must be submitted to the administrative FSA county office that maintains the records of the farm or farms to which the applicant applies. If some or all of the land does not have farm records established, the application may be submitted to the FSA county office that services the county where the FSFL financed equipment or facility will be primarily located.
( b ) Upon request, the applicant must furnish information and documents as the State or county committee deems reasonably necessary to support the application. This may include financial statements, receipts, bills, invoices, purchase orders, specifications, drawings, plats, or written authorization of access.
( c ) For sugar storage facility loans, a loan application must be submitted to the county FSA office that maintains the applicant's records. If no such records exist, loan applications must be submitted to the county office serving the headquarters location of the sugar processor.
( d ) Submitting an application does not ensure loan approval nor create any liability on behalf of CCC. Borrowers who authorize delivery, site preparation, or construction actions without an approved loan, do so at their own risk.
( e ) The application must include documentation of the need for storage, or for FSFL microloans self-certification, as specified in § 1436.9.
[74 FR 41587, Aug. 18, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 25593, Apr. 29, 2016]
#### § 1221.109 Compensation and reimbursement.

The representatives of the Board shall serve without compensation but shall be reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses, as approved by the Board, incurred by them in the performance of their duties as Board representatives.
RANDALL G. LAY

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2267

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed September 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. John T. Brown , Judge

.

Randall G. Lay, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney

General

, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 1221.7 Customs.

*Customs* means the U.S. Customs and Border Protection of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
§ 1260.113 Established national nonprofit industry-governed organizations. *Established national nonprofit industry-governed organizations* means organizations which: ( a ) Are nonprofit organizations pursuant to sections 501(c) (3), (5) or (6) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c) (3), (5) and (6));
( b ) Are governed by a board of directors representing the cattle or beef industry on a national basis; and
( c ) Have been active and ongoing for at least two years.
[51 FR 26138, July 18, 1986, as amended at 77 FR 52599, Aug. 30, 2012]
(January 5, 1967)

(Republished)

#### In the Matter of Hudson Land Corp., Appellant, v. Hortense W. Gabel, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. The order of this court entered on December 13, 1966 [27 A D 2d 645] is vacated. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.
#### In re MOWRY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 20, 1906.)

In the matter of Albert L. Mowry, deceased.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
§ 1230.82 Confidential treatment. All information obtained from the books, records or reports required to be maintained under §§ 1230.80 and 1230.81 of this subpart shall be kept confidential by all persons, including employees and agents and former employees and agents of the Board, all officers and employees and all former officers and employees of the Department, and by all officers and all employees and all former officers and employees of contracting parties having access to such information, and shall not be available to Board members. Only those persons having a specific need for such information in order to effectively implement, administer, or enforce the provisions of this subpart shall have access to such information. In addition, only such information so furnished or acquired shall be disclosed as the Secretary deems relevant and then only in a suit or administrative hearing brought at the direction, or upon the request, of the Secretary or to which the Secretary or any officer of the United States is a party, and involving this subpart. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to prohibit: ( a ) The issuance of general statements based upon the reports of a number of persons subject to this subpart or of statistical data collected therefrom, which statements or data do not identify the information furnished by any person; or
( b ) The publication, by direction of the Secretary, of the name of any person who has been adjudged to have violated this subpart, together with a statement of the particular provisions of this subpart violated by such person.
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 EASTON-BELL SPORTS, LLC 

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 Pursuant to Section 8 of the Easton-Bell Sports, LLC 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Board of Managers of Easton-Bell Sports, LLC having approved this Amendment to the Plan,
the Plan is hereby amended by amending and restating in its entirety Section 5(a) of the Plan as follows: 
 (a) Number
of Units. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 5(c), the aggregate number of Units that may be awarded under the Plan shall be 112,766,083 Units. If any award granted under the Plan terminates without having been Vested in full, the
number of Units as to which such award was not Vested shall be available for future grants within the limits set forth in this 

Section 5(a). 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, Easton-Bell Sports, LLC has caused this instrument of amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the 14th day of December, 2012. 

 

			
	EASTON-BELL SPORTS, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark A. Tripp

		 	Name: Mark A. Tripp
		 	Title: Chief Financial Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           School Based Student Drug Testing Programs      

# School Based Student Drug Testing Programs

This is a comprehensive site offering resources, publications, research findings, best practices, and guidance on policy design and development. The site is designed to meet the needs of a range of audiences, from students and parents interested in learning more about program goals to educators and administrators involved in program management. Random student drug testing is an effective prevention tool for discouraging drug use among a very vulnerable population. It can help identify substance users early, before a drug dependency begins, as well as students with a dependency so that they may be referred to appropriate treatment. Random testing also promotes a safer, healthier learning environment.

http://www2.ed.gov/programs/drugtesting/index.html
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Please remove first copy of Request for exemption due to clerical errors.
#### § 1402.4 Information availability.

The terms and conditions of sale with respect to commodities that are not sold through Internet-based marketing service are available online. Requests for terms and conditions may be addressed to the Director, Warehouse and Inventory Division, Stop 0553, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9860.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 8, 2011 

0228 

Order 

 

March 8, 2011 

142425 & (32) 

EDWARD GLADSTON ROSARIO 

PRAGASAM, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142425 

 COA: 297888 

Oakland CC: 2009-099928-CZ 

CIENA HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT, 

SUNSHINE REHAB SERVICES, JOSEPH 

METIAS, AMRIT GILL, and BENNET 

SAMUEL, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the October 8, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.