alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFinal Design for a Comprehensive Orbital Debris Management ProgramThe rationale and specifics for the design of a comprehensive program for the control of orbital debris, as well as details of the various components of the overall plan, are described. The problem of orbital debris has been steadily worsening since the first successful launch in 1957. The hazards posed by orbital debris suggest the need for a progressive plan for the prevention of future debris, as well as the reduction of the current debris level. The proposed debris management plan includes debris removal systems and preventative techniques and policies. The debris removal is directed at improving the current debris environment. Because of the variance in sizes of debris, a single system cannot reasonably remove all kinds of debris. An active removal system, which deliberately retrieves targeted debris from known orbits, was determined to be effective in the disposal of debris tracked directly from earth. However, no effective system is currently available to remove the untrackable debris. The debris program is intended to protect the orbital environment from future abuses. This portion of the plan involves various environment from future abuses. This portion of the plan involves various methods and rules for future prevention of debris. The preventative techniques are protective methods that can be used in future design of payloads. The prevention policies are rules which should be employed to force the prevention of orbital debris.Document ID19900018423Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 4, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186674NAS 1.26:186674Accession Number90N27739Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASW-4435Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900018423.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ ̈¦17

§ ̈¦17

32H

32H

9

28

19C

2

8

A

31Y

2

8B

26C

15Z

18G

27A

27E

14

8A

19A

3

26

27D

23

8C

15B

1H

21

34

23C

10B

31D

22E

24

31C

1D

29A

17

19E

11

31Z

18E

19D

22A

27C

31K

8I

4

25

29C

32A

5B

19H

18

15C

31T

14A

8E 18B

35

31W

26D

13

31U

28A

1A

19G

31X

23B

15A

18L

1C

14D

22F

17A

31E

1F

8D

28B

17D

23H

18A

14C

1E

44

37Z

40

7A

12B

12A

16

1B

18N

22C

23A

29B

19B

37

23D

31M

5C

31L

18H

27B

1Z

1G

33A

31I

20A

8H

15

38

23E

7B

28C

33C

35B

27

18C

18J

18D

4A

31H

20

18M

43

30C

8L

22B

42

4B

29

31V

14B

18I

31B

37A

18K

18F

36

31A

13B

22D

31G

31P

31O

13A

31J

26A

4C

30A

14F

12

19F

1

32J

32G

7

2D

22

31S

41

8F

18O

32C

32

26B

7D

7C

21A

17C

39

7E

17B

32D

6

30B

38A

33B

31F

19

31

10

2B

33D

33

5

30

32B

23G

12C

43

15Z

12

21

23D

18

23

18

29C

31

18

31

39

10

1H

22

23G

18

8

18

39

35

39

14

35

9

33

43

18

20

31O

41

29

2B

8I

20

18

14

31T

28

33A

4

1

44

18

30

1Z

18

7B

4

18

27

1H

20

32

19

17

29C

22

15

7

11

1Z

5

20A

19

4

19H

31P

22

18

14

31A

31I

32

20

23G

10

38

31C

8

31W

39

33A

7B

22B

18

19D

32

36

1A

33A

37

35

25

15

7

28B

43

15

18

31S

8A

1

7A

8I

8I

30

2B

31C

10

23E

19

9

8H

1

17C

1Z

18

43

18

42

1A

1

18

17C

23C

8I

15Z

19D

31P

41

30B

39

20

18

8I

19

12C

19

14C

13

31W

1

8

31T

19

37

15

18

8A

12

33

1Z

30

2

30A

19

18

39

18

19H

31

4

19

19

11

23H

1

8A

18

18B

15

31S

5B

20

1

19D

31

UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

ARIZONA

PHOENIX DISTRICT OFFICE

AGUA FRIA

NATIONAL MONUMENT

Final Route Designation

±

0 0.45 0.9 1.8 2.7

Miles

Not intended as a route access map.

No warranty is made by Bureau of Land Management for

use of this map for purposes not intended by BLM.

Legend

Route Designation

Close

Limit

Mitigate/Limit

Open

Mitigate/Open

BLM land

State land

USFS land

Private land

Interstate

AFNM Monument Boundary
NICOR Inc.   
                                                       Form 10-K    
                                                       Exhibit 21.01


                            NICOR Inc.
                           Subsidiaries         
                       At December 31, 1995


                                                         State or
                                                      Jurisdiction of
Registrant                                             Incorporation 

NICOR Inc.                                              Illinois

Subsidiaries of Registrant*

   Gas Distribution
   Northern Illinois Gas Company                        Illinois
       NI-Gas Exploration, Inc.                         Illinois

   Shipping
   Birdsall, Inc.                                       Florida
       Belize Container Terminals Ltd.                  Belize
       Birdsall de Mexico, S.A.                         Mexico
       Birdsall Shipping Co., Ltd. (85%)                Liberia
           Birdsall Shipping, S.A. (38%)                Panama
       Seven Seas Insurance Company, Inc.               Florida
       Transfresca, S.A.                                Honduras
       Tropical Shipping and Construction Co., Ltd.     Bahamas
           Birdsall Shipping Co., Ltd. (15%)            Liberia
           Birdsall Shipping, S.A. (62%)                Panama
           Container Terminals, Ltd.                    Bahamas
           Freship, S.A.                                Dominican
                                                           Republic
           Seven Seas Insurance Company Ltd.            Bahamas
               Tropic Express, Ltd.                     Bahamas
       Tropical Shipping, Inc.                          Delaware
       Tropical Shipping of Canada Inc.                 Delaware


These wholly owned subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial
statements of NICOR Inc.


*  List includes active subsidiaries in reportable segments only and omits
   certain subsidiaries which in the aggregate do not constitute a
   significant subsidiary.
#### § 1540.5 Submission of recommendations.

If the Secretary has reason to believe that the perishable product which is the subject of a petition under § 1540.4 of this subpart is being imported into the United States in such increased quantities as to be a substantial cause of serious injury, or the threat thereof, to the domestic industry producing a perishable product like or directly competitive with the imported perishable product and that emergency action is warranted, the Secretary, within 14 days after the filing of the petition under § 1540.4 of this subpart, shall recommend to the President that the President take emergency action. If the Secretary determines not to recommend the imposition of emergency action, the Secretary shall publish a notice of such determination and will so advise the petitioner within 14 days after the filing of the petition.
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

  Arizona

> - Flagstaff
- Pheonix - Garfield
- Pheonix - Capitol Mall
- South Tucson
- Tucson
- Winslow

----
EX-10.3(a)



 Exhibit 10.3(a) 
 June 1, 2012 
 Graham Capital Management, L.P. 

Rock Ledge Financial Center 
 40 Highland Avenue

 Rowayton, CT 06853 
 Attention:
Mr. Paul Sedlack 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Sedlack: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below
(the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II. 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian Centner
		 	  

		 	Brian Centner
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director


			
	
	GRAHAM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul Sedlack

		 	  



			
		
	Print Name:	 	 Paul Sedlack, CEO



			
	BC/sr
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1464.21 Ranking considerations and proposal selection. ( a ) *Final selection.* NRCS will rank and select proposals for partnership agreements pursuant to the evaluation criteria listed in 1464.20(a)(2).
( b ) *Priority to certain proposals.* NRCS may give a higher priority to proposals for partnership agreements that— ( 1 ) Assist producers in meeting or avoiding the need for a natural resource regulatory requirement;
( 2 ) Have a high percentage of producers in the area to be covered by the agreement;
( 3 ) Significantly leverage non-Federal financial and technical resources and coordinate with other local, State, or national efforts;
( 4 ) Build new partnerships with local, State, and private entities to include a diversity of stakeholders in the project;
( 5 ) Deliver a high percentage of applied conservation to achieve conservation benefits and address the priority resource concern for a designated CCA;
( 6 ) Implement the project consistent with existing watershed, habitat, or other area restoration plans;
( 7 ) Provide innovation in conservation methods and delivery, including outcome-based performance measures and methods;
( 8 ) To a significant extent involve— ( i ) Historically underserved producers;
( ii ) A community-based organization comprising, representing, or exclusively working with historically underserved producers;
( iii ) Developing an innovative conservation approach or technology specifically targeting historically underserved producers' unique needs and limitations; or
( iv ) An 1890 or 1994 land grant institution (7 U.S.C. 3222 *et seq.*), Hispanic-serving institution (20 U.S.C. 1101a), or other minority-serving institution, such as an historically Black college or university (20 U.S.C. 1061), a tribally controlled college or university (25 U.S.C. 1801), or Asian American and Pacific Islander-serving institution (20 U.S.C. 1059g); or
( 9 ) Meet other factors that are important for achieving the purposes of the program, as determined by NRCS.
( c ) *Proposals in CCAs.* ( 1 ) NRCS will select proposals for partnership agreements within CCAs that address one or more priority resource concerns for which the CCA is designated.
( 2 ) NRCS will identify the designated CCAs and publish the priority resource concerns for each CCA.
( 3 ) NRCS will identify the priority resource concerns and associated ranking criteria in any announcement under § 1464.20.
( 4 ) Lands outside of a CCA are not eligible for consideration under the CCA funding pool, even where such land may influence resource concerns within the CCA.
[85 FR 8137, Feb. 13, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 3744, Jan. 15, 2021]
#### Julius Friedman, administrator of the estate of Ben Manfield, deceased, appellee, v. Joseph Peckler, impleaded with Modern Woodmen of America, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,738.

Opinion filed November 27, 1929.

William A. Rogan and Morton Jacobson, for appellant; William C. Burns and R. Hamlin Petty, of counsel. Campbell & Fischer. and Latham Castle, for appellee; John G. Campbell and Herman A. Fischer, Jr., of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice

Wilson delivered the opinion of the court.
EX-10.6(c)



 Exhibit 10.6(c) 
 June 1, 2012 
 Campbell & Company, Inc. 
 2850 Quarry Lake Drive 
 Baltimore, MD 21209 
 Attn: Mr. Steve Roussin 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr. Roussin:

 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Potomac Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P. 


 Please
acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290.

  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By: 	 	 /s/ Brian Centner

		 	Brian Centner
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director
	
	CAMPBELL & COMPANY, INC.
		
	By: 	 	 /s/ Thomas P. Lloyd



			
		
	Print Name:	 	 Thomas P. Lloyd


 BC/sr
#### RHODES, Appellant, v. MUTUAL RESERVE LIFE INS. CO., Respondent.

(Su*1140preme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 16, 1906.)

Action by William S. Rhodes against the Mutual Reserve Life Insurance Company.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 1214.83 Proceedings after termination. ( a ) Upon the termination of this subpart, the Board shall recommend not more than three of its members to the Secretary to serve as trustees for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the Board. Such persons, upon designation by the Secretary, shall become trustees of all of the funds and property then in the possession or under control of the Board, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered, or any other claim existing at the time of such termination.
( b ) The said trustees shall: ( 1 ) Continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary;
( 2 ) Carry out the obligations of the Board under any contracts or agreements entered into pursuant to the Order;
( 3 ) From time to time account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of the Board and the trustees, to such person or persons as the Secretary may direct; and
( 4 ) Upon request of the Secretary execute such assignments or other instruments necessary and appropriate to vest in such persons title and right to all funds, property and claims vested in the Board or the trustees pursuant to the Order.
( c ) Any person to whom funds, property or claims have been transferred or delivered pursuant to the Order shall be subject to the same obligations imposed upon the Board and upon the trustees.
( d ) Any residual funds not required to defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be turned over to the Secretary to be disposed of, to the extent practical, to one or more Christmas tree organizations in the United States in the interest of continuing Christmas tree promotion, research, and information programs.
#### § 15d.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to set forth the nondiscrimination policy of the United States Department of Agriculture in programs or activities conducted by the Department, including such programs and activities in which the Department or any agency thereof makes available any benefit directly to persons under such programs and activities.
§ 1530.107 Bond or letter of credit requirements. ( a ) The licensee may charge program sugar in anticipation of the transfer or export of refined sugar, the export of sugar in sugar containing products, or the production of certain polyhydric alcohols, if the licensee establishes a performance bond or a letter of credit with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which meets the criteria set forth in this section.
( b ) The bond or letter of credit may cover entries made either during the period of time specified in the bond (a term bond) or for a specified entry (a single entry bond).
( c ) Only the licensee who will refine the sugar, manufacture the sugar containing product, or produce certain polyhydric alcohols may be the principal on the bond or letter of credit covering such sugar to be re-exported or used in the production of certain polyhydric alcohols. The surety or sureties shall be among those listed by the Secretary of the Treasury as acceptable on Federal bonds.
( d ) The obligation under the bond or letter of credit shall be made effective no later than the date of entry of the sugar for refiners or the date of transfer of the corresponding sugar for manufacture into a sugar containing product or certain polyhydric alcohols.
( e ) The amount of the bond or letter of credit shall be equal to 20 cents per pound of sugar to be entered under the license.
( f ) If a licensee fails to qualify for credit to a license within the specified time period of the date of export or use of corresponding sugar in an amount sufficient to offset the charge to the license for that corresponding sugar, payment shall be made to the U.S. Treasury. The payment shall be equal to the difference between the Number 11 contract price and the Number 14 contract price (New York Coffee, Sugar and Cocoa Exchange) in effect on the last market day before the date of entry of the sugar or the last market day before the end of the period during which export or use was required, whichever difference is greater. The difference shall be multiplied by the quantity of refined sugar, converted to raw value, that should have been exported in compliance with this part. If there was not a Number 11, or a Number 14 contract price for the relevant market day, the Licensing Authority may estimate such price as he or she deems appropriate.
#### *Yocum vs. Daniel.*

Webt.

Case. 8.

Error to the Montgomery Circuit; Silas W. Robbins, Judge.

*Duelling. Actions Qui tam. Rights of Trustees of Seminaries. Fines and forfeitures. County Levies.*

January 23.

Question staQwi *tam,*the only action for the penalty incurred by «ending a -chndange to fight in single comba t. The action cannot, be maintained in the name oi ¡in individual and the tru-te.es of Seminaries. Tin* Commonwealth m».«t be a party. *15If the trustees can claim, they cannot do so until the fine and forfeiture has been collected by the proper officer. But quere, whether fines and forfeitures to be recovered by *qui tarn n*cl ion are appropriated io seminaries.

*14Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of .the Court.

The only question necessary to be decided in this case is, whether a *Qui tam*suit can be maintained by an individual for his own use, and that of the Trustees of a county seminary, to recover the penalty of $500 forfeited by challenging to single combat.

There is no doubt that *Qui tam*is the proper and only action in such a case. But we cannot admit that it can be maintained in the name of a seminary or its Trustees. The commonwealth should be a party.

The duelling act vests one moiety of the fine in the commonwealth; and the-act appropriating certain fines and forfeitures to certain seminaries, does not vest the legal right in the Trustees until the collection and payment to them of the fines. We think that a fair construction of all the provisions of the act will authorise no other conclusion; and this opinion is fortified by the section which directs a motion by the *15clerk of the trustees, in tbe name of the commbnwe dth, against any officer of the law who may have Collected and failed to pay over any fine, which the seminary has a right to receive.

*Davis*and *Triplett*for plaintiff; *Hanson,*for defendant.

We are too, inclined to the opinion that no fines are appropriated to seminaries, except such as are'wholly payable to the commonwealth, or in diminution of county levies. -A moiety of a fine is not *the.fine;*the expression fine and forfeiture, *eco vi*termini, means a totality: it cannot be considered a fraction of an entire penalty.

As therefore, tbe suit and .judgment in this case are in favor of Daniel for his own use and that of the trustees of the Montgomery Academy, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded, to be disposed of as the principles of this opinion require.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1416.111 Honeybee payment calculations. ( a ) An eligible honeybee producer may receive payments for eligible honeybee feed losses, as specified in § 1416.103(h), based on a national payment rate, as determined in § 1416.109, multiplied by the producer's actual cost for honeybee feed that was: ( 1 ) Damaged or destroyed due to an eligible adverse weather or eligible loss condition, as specified in § 1416.103(h)(1); and
( 2 ) Purchased, above normal, to maintain the honeybees during an eligible adverse weather or eligible loss condition until additional honeybee feed becomes available, as specified in § 1416.103(h)(2);
( b ) An eligible honeybee producer may receive payments for eligible honeybee colony losses, as specified in § 1416.103(i), based on a national payment rate, as determined in § 1416.109(b), multiplied by: ( 1 ) Average fair market value of the honeybee colonies as computed using nationwide prices unless some other price data is approved for use by the Deputy Administrator; and
( 2 ) Number of eligible honeybee colonies that were damaged or destroyed due to an eligible adverse weather or eligible loss condition, in excess of normal honeybee mortality, as determined by the Deputy Administrator.
( c ) An eligible honeybee producer may receive payments for eligible honeybee hive losses, as specified in § 1416.103(i), based on a national payment rate, as determined in § 1416.109, multiplied by: ( 1 ) Average fair market value for honeybee hives as computed using nationwide prices unless some other price data is approved for use by the Deputy Administrator; and
( 2 ) Number of honeybee hives that were damaged or destroyed due to an eligible adverse weather or eligible loss condition.
( d ) Payments calculated in this section are subject to the adjustments and limits provided for in this part.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Bioenergy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vince
M. Guest, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




(1)       
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)       
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




Registrant
              Date:
      June 28, 2010
            
            Universal
      Bioenergy, Inc.
              By:
      /s/ Vince M. GuestVince
      M. GuestPrinciple
      Financial Officer