1

OMB Number: 1820-0027 Revised: 02/01/2013

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION

A. Justification 

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any

legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a hard copy of the 

appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of 

information, or you may provide a valid URL link or paste the applicable section1. Specify the 

review type of the collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement 

without change). If revised, briefly specify the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, make note 

of the sections or changed sections, if applicable.

The National Institute on Disability Rehabilitation Research’s (NIDRR) 

mission is to generate new knowledge and promote its effective use to improve 

the abilities of individuals with disabilities to perform activities of their 

choice in the community, and also to expand society’s capacity to provide 

full opportunities and accommodations for its citizens with disabilities. 

Toward this end, NIDRR conducts comprehensive and coordinated programs of 

research and related activities to maximize the full inclusion, social 

integration, employment and independent living of individuals of all ages 

with disabilities. NIDRR's focus includes research in areas such as 

employment; health and function; technology for access and function; 

independent living and community integration; and other associated disability 

research areas. 

NIDRR provides support to research and related activities in the area of 

disability through discretionary grants. These activities are authorized by 

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and the program regulations under 

34 CFR Parts 350-360. NIDRR’s Awards are made on the basis of competitively 

reviewed applications. This information collection (IC) consists of the 

grant application packages necessary for individuals and institutions to 

apply for NIDRR grants. If NIDRR does not collect this information from 

applicants, it could not comply with its legislative mandate and conduct 

expert peer reviews to make grant funding decisions. 

The grant application package is necessary to standardize applications for 

the many programs in NIDRR with the least amount of burden to the applicants. 

Without the information contained in this application package, the Department 

would not be able to effectively comply with the legislative mandate and 

conduct expert peer reviews to make grant funding decisions. Applicants, 

including individuals and small businesses, may elect to apply for grants. 

 

1

Please limit pasted text to no longer than 3 paragraphs.
2

OMB Number: 1820-0027 Revised: 02/01/2013

The information required by the government is minimal. NIDRR discourages 

elaborate or lengthy applications. Most applicants elect to submit far more 

information than NIDRR requires. 

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new 

collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the 

current collection.

NIDRR is unable to use the Department of Education’s approved generic 

application package because of the program-specific selection criteria 

published in CFR 350.54, CFR 356.30, and CFR 359.31. Therefore, NIDRR must 

have its own application packages. 

NIDRR uses these grant application packages to standardize applications for 

the many programs in NIDRR. This IC includes application packages for the 

following programs: 84.133A, Disability Rehabilitation Research Projects; 

84.133B, Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers; 84.133E, 

Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers; 84.133F, Research Fellowship; 

84.133G, Field Initiated Project; 84.133N, Special Projects and 

Demonstrations for Spinal Cord Injuries Program; and 84.133P, Advanced

Rehabilitation Research Training Project

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of 

information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the 

decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration given to using 

technology to reduce burden.

The Department provides electronic access to forms and instructions for SF424, ED 424 and ED 524 (OMB No. 1894-0004) to record much of the information 

required by P.L. 93-112. Some required information items are outside the 

scope of these forms. The Department uses Grants.gov APPLY and the e-Reader 

module of the U.S. Department of Education’s e-Grants Web Portal processes 

for this program to expedite the application review and project awards. 

Concurrently, this electronic process is intended to reduce applicant burden.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information 

already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.

As stated in Item 3, the Department uses ED standard forms to collect basic 

descriptive applicant information. In addition, this package seeks to reduce 

burden and duplication by using program specific grant application packages.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any

methods used to minimize burden. A small entity may be (1) a small business which is deemed 

to be one that is independently owned and operated and that is not dominant in its field of 

operation; (2) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise that is independently

owned and operated and is not dominant in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, 

which is a government of a city, county, town, township, school district, or special district with a 

population of less than 50,000.
3

OMB Number: 1820-0027 Revised: 02/01/2013

The collection of information does not impact small businesses or other small 

entities.

6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not 

conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing 

burden.

The Department would not comply with the legislative mandate (P.L. 93-112) if 

this collection was not conducted each year.

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted 

in a manner:

 requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

 requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in 

fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

 requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

 requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, 

grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;

 in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable 

results than can be generalized to the universe of study;

 requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and 

approved by OMB;

 that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in 

statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are 

consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other 

agencies for compatible confidential use; or

 requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential 

information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect 

the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.

At the discretion of the applicant, proprietary information may be included 

in an application. This would be for the purpose of explaining the proposed 

research and/or research and development activity. Confidentiality 

assurances and information protection mechanisms are explained in item 9.

8. As applicable, state that the Department has published the 60 and 30 Federal Register notices 

as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to 

submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and 

describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address 

comments received on cost and hour burden.
4

OMB Number: 1820-0027 Revised: 02/01/2013

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the 

availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, 

disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or 

reported.

Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those 

who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of 

information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may

preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.

The Department published a 30 Federal Register notice requesting public 

comment.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration 

of contractors or grantees with meaningful justification.

There are no payments or gifts to respondents other than the remuneration of 

grantees.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the 

assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. If personally identifiable information (PII) is 

being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included on the instrument. Please provide a 

citation for the Systems of Record Notice and the date a Privacy Impact Assessment was 

completed as indicated on the IC Data Form. A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that 

authorizes the pledge of confidentiality should be provided.2If the collection is subject to the 

Privacy Act, the Privacy Act statement is deemed sufficient with respect to confidentiality. If 

there is no expectation of confidentiality, simply state that the Department makes no pledge 

about the confidentially of the data.

There are assurances of confidentiality provided to applicants using this 

data collection. 

The assurances in the ED grant application package are contained in:

 Grant Application Preparation Instructions and Requirements {part A 

“Protection of Information in Applications;”

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual 

behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. 

The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, 

the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from 

whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

 

2

Requests for this information are in accordance with the following ED and OMB policies: Privacy Act of 1974, 

OMB Circular A-108 – Privacy Act Implementation – Guidelines and Responsibilities, OMB Circular A-130 

Appendix I – Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Records About Individuals, OMB M-03-22 – OMB 

Guidance for Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the E-Government Act of 2002, OMB M-06-15 –

Safeguarding Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6-104 – Privacy Act of 1974 (Collection, Use and Protection 

of Personally Identifiable Information)
5

OMB Number: 1820-0027 Revised: 02/01/2013

There are no questions of a sensitive nature.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:

 Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal government, 

individuals or households, private sector – businesses or other for-profit, private 

sector – not-for-profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments), 

frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was 

estimated, including identification of burden type: recordkeeping, reporting or third 

party disclosure. All narrative should be included in item 12. Unless directed to do 

so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to 

base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential 

respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely 

because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated 

hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should 

not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

 If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden 

estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in the ROCIS IC Burden 

Analysis Table. (The table should at minimum include Respondent types, IC activity, 

Respondent and Responses, Hours/Response, and Total Hours)

 Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for 

collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. 

The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection 

activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 

14.

Estimates of Hour Burden for this Information Collection:

Number of Applications: 655

Hours Needed to Complete: 200

Total Burden Hours: 131,000

Estimates of Annual Cost Burden to Respondents for this Information 

Collection:

Preparation of Application ($28.00 per hour X 200 burden hours) 

... .$5,600

Postage and Printing ($50.00 per application X 0 applications3) 

... $ 0

Total Cost Burden (per applicant) ............. $5,600

Estimated total average number of application, percentage and hours by 

individual programs.

Average # % of 655 Estimated

 

3 NIDRR is requiring that all submissions be received electronic 

format unless a waiver is granted.
6

OMB Number: 1820-0027 Revised: 02/01/2013

Program of Applications estimated # Hours Amount

133A 125 19.23% 25,000 $ 700,000

133B 30 3.85% 6,000 $ 168,000

133E 30 4.62% 6,000 $ 168,000

133F 75 11.54% 15,000 $ 420,000

133G 350 53.85% 70,000 $1,960,000

133N 35 5.38% 7,000 $ 196,000

133P 10 1.53% 2,000 $ 56,000

Total 655 100% 131,000 $3,668,000

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers 

resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown 

in Items 12 and 14.)

 The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost 

component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and 

maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account 

costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the 

information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors 

including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, 

the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and 

start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as 

purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing 

equipment; and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.

 If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost 

burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information 

collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost 

burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), 

utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing 

economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the 

information collection, as appropriate.

 Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions 

thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with 

requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to 

provide information or keep records for the government or (4) as part of customary and 

usual business or private practices. Also, these estimates should not include the hourly

costs (i.e., the monetization of the hours) captured above in Item 12

Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost : 

Total Annual Costs (O&M) : 

____________________
7

OMB Number: 1820-0027 Revised: 02/01/2013

Total Annualized Costs Requested : 

There are no other respondent costs beyond those provided under Item 12.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description 

of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational 

expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that 

would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may

aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.

OSERS, including NIDRR, has a contractor to assist program staff to organize, 

mail, contact peer reviewers for the grant competitions. Contractor Staff 

Time is based on approved contract. In FY 2010, the estimated cost for 20 

competitions was $757,262, which equals $37,863 average contractor cost per 

competition. In FY 2011, the estimated cost for 17 competitions was $71,270, 

which equals $44,192 average contractor cost per competition. In FY 2012, the 

estimated cost for 16 competitions was $673,751, which equals $42,109 average 

contractor cost per competition. The total expense to the federal government 

for 1820-0027 is $1,516,594.

NIDRR individual staff time for peer review is estimated at 20% of time. 

This includes: (1) Review of applications; (2) Recruitment of reviewers; (3) 

Review of peer reviewer material; (4) Actual competition; and (5) Pre-funding 

and competition slate preparation.

NIDRR uses an average of 5 to 7 reviewers per panel. The number of panels 

change based on the number of priorities and the number of applications 

received per priority competition. Electronic Peer Reviewer reimbursement is 

estimated at $200.00 per day for 3 days of Peer Review and $200.00 for one 

day preparation, to total $800.00 per reviewer. 

NIDRR has not done in-person peer review for the last 8 years.

BY PROGRAM COST FOR ELECTRONIC PEER REVIEW PROCESS(FY 2012)

Number Number 

Of of NIDRR Staff Contractor Peer Reviewer

Program Competitions Panels Time Staff Time Time

133A 7 12 $240,816 $128,268 $ 48,000.00

133B 1 1 $ 20,068 $ 10,689 $ 4,000.00

133E 2 2 $ 40,136 $ 21,378 $ 8,000.00

133F 1 4 $ 80,272 $ 42,756 $ 12,800.00

133G-1/2 2 15 $301,020 $160,335 $120,000.00

133N 1 2 $75,726 $21,666 $ 8,000.00

133P 1 2 $ 40,136 $ 21,378 $ 8,000.00

OVERALL COST FOR ELECTRONIC PEER REVIEW PROCESS

NIDRR Staff Contractor Peer Reviewer

Per Person Staff Time Time (5 reviewers)

$842,856.00 $448,951.00 $224,800.00

AVERAGE OVERALL COST FOR PEER REVIEW PROCESS
8

OMB Number: 1820-0027 Revised: 02/01/2013

(1 competition – 1 panel)

NIDRR Staff Contractor Peer Reviewer

Per Person Staff Time Time (5)

$20,068.00 $10,689 $4,000.00

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Generally, adjustments in 

burden result from re-estimating burden and/or from economic phenomenon outside of an 

agency’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an organic increase in the size of the 

reporting universe). Program changes result from a deliberate action that materially changes a 

collection of information and generally are result of new statute or an agency action (e.g., 

changing a form, revising regulations, redefining the respondent universe, etc.). Burden changes 

should be disaggregated by type of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new statute, 

and/or program change due to agency discretion), type of collection (new, revision, extension, 

reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) and include totals for changes in 

burden hours, responses and costs (if applicable).

There are no program changes or adjustments from the previous information 

collection.

16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation 

and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time 

schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of 

information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

All publications generated by NIDRR grantees are submitted and publicly 

available via the National Rehabilitation Information Center (NARIC) 

(www.naric.com). 

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information 

collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

OMB approval of this collection with the expiration date will be displayed.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of 

Paperwork Reduction Act.

There are no exceptions to the Certification Statement.