alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Bioenergy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard Craven, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




(1)       
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)       
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




Registrant
                Date:
      March 25, 2010
              
              Universal
      Bioenergy, Inc.
                By:
      /s/ Richard CravenRichard
      CravenChief
      Executive Officer (Principle Executive
Officer)
No. 42,448

#### State of Kansas, *Appellee,*v. John Wesley Jackline, *Appellant.*

(362 P. 2d 658)

Opinion filed June 10, 1961.

*William Cook*of Kansas City argued the cause, and *Roy Cook*of Kansas City was with him on the briefs for the appellant.

*Samuel J. Wells,*Assistant County Attorney, argued the cause and *William Ferguson,*Attorney General, *Robert Hoffman,*Assistant Attorney General, *Robert J. Foster,*County Attorney, and *Matthew G. Podrebarac,*Assistant County Attorney, were with him on the briefs for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jackson, J.:

After a full trial by a jury, the appellant was convicted of robbery in the first degree in the district court and sentenced to twenty years to life imprisonment under the habitual criminal statute, G. S. 1949, 21-107a. He has appealed the conviction to this court and has assigned ten alleged errors in the trial of the case.

Upon a motion stating that appellant had no funds, this court waived the rules of the court as to printing of abstract and brief.

The abstract of appellant contains some ninety-four legal size pages and his brief contains thirty pages. However, the abstract is composed largely of the objections and long arguments of counsel for both sides without showing the testimony of witnesses nor the situation in the trial in which orders made by the district court *430occurred. Thus, it is impossible for this court to examine the record of the trial to determine whether all of the ten assignments of error are completely groundless. We would observe, from what we can discover concerning the trial, that many of the ten assignments would appear to have no merit.

It is a quite well-known rule, even in a criminal appeal, that it is incumbent upon the appellant to make it clearly appear that reversible error has occurred in the trial from which the appeal was taken. As was said in *State v.*Russell, 182 Kan. 649, 655, 323 P. 2d 913:

> “Error is never presumed and it is incumbent upon the party complaining to establish affirmatively that error was committed.”

Attention is also directed to *State v.*Hess, 178 Kan. 452, 457, 289 P. 2d 759, and cases cited.

The counter abstract of the state gives a quite complete synopsis of the evidence introduced at the trial and shows that there was ample evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

Since there is no showing of reversible error in the record and since it would be impossible and of no importance to discuss the individual assignments of error, the judgment and sentence appealed from must be affirmed. It is so ordered.
Exhibit 4.28


 


PROMISSORY NOTE COMBINATION #4 EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


 


 


This Promissory
Note Combination #4 Extension Agreement, hereinafter referred to as “Combination #4 Extension”, entered into this Sixteenth
day of November, 2012, by and among Intellinetics, Inc, hereinafter called “Maker” and Alpharion Capital Partners,
hereinafter called “Lender”.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender have entered into a Promissory Note Combination #4 dated September 2, 2012 for the amount of ONE HUNDRED ELEVEN
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED and 00/100 DOLLARS ($111,500), hereinafter referred to as “Note Combination #4”. Said Note Combination
#4 was originally due on a due date of November 16, 2012.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender desire to enter into this Combination #4 Extension Agreement in order to extend the due date of the Note Combination
#4 for an additional thirty days to December 16, 2012.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
it is dually agreed by both Maker and Lender to extend the due date of the Note Combination #4 to December 16, 2012.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Maker and Lender
has duly executed this


Combination #4 Extension as of the day and year above
first written.


 




	 	INTELLINETICS,
    INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/William J. Santiago
	 	 
	 	ALPHARION CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/Rick Hughes
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1437.501 Applicability; definition of “tropical region” and additional definitions. ( a ) This subpart applies to covered tropical crops in the tropical region, as those terms are defined in this subpart. Benefits under this part may be extended to those crops only to the extent that they are otherwise eligible for assistance under this part. Covered crops do not include “value loss” crops, as defined elsewhere in this part. For those crops that are covered by this subpart, loss and payment determinations for NAP covered in this part are determined by the rules that otherwise apply to NAP subject to the modifications provided by this subpart. The rules that otherwise apply include, but are not limited to, limitations on payments that are specified in part 1400 of this chapter.
( b ) For purposes of this subpart: ( 1 ) *Tropical region* includes, as may be further limited by the Deputy Administrator: Hawaii, American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, and the territories and possessions of the United States. Other areas may be included as determined by the Deputy Administrator to be required by law. References to specific areas elsewhere in this subpart will not limit the ability of the Deputy Administrator to limit the geographic scope of this subpart.
( 2 ) *Covered tropical crops* means those crops and commodities in the tropical region governed by this subpart, those being all crops and commodities in the tropical region that are otherwise eligible for generating a benefit claim under this part, except for value-loss crops as defined elsewhere in this part.
( c ) The Deputy Administrator may adjust requirements for assistance so as to provide a fair transition from previous rules for crop covered by this subpart to those provisions which are provided for in this subpart.
[71 FR 52739, Sept. 7, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 21019, Apr. 9, 2013; 79 FR 74583, Dec. 15, 2014]
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1318 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2023 

Received 

AN ACT 

To authorize the location of a monument on the National 

Mall to commemorate and honor the women’s suffrage 

movement and the passage of the 19th Amendment to 

the Constitution, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1318 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Suffrage Na3 tional Monument Location Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE NATIONAL MONUMENT. 

5 (a) SITE.—Notwithstanding section 8908(c) of title 

6 40, United States Code, the Women’s Suffrage National 

7 Monument shall be located within the Reserve. 

8 (b) APPLICABILITY OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS

9 ACT.—Except as provided in subsection (a), chapter 89 

10 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the 

11 ‘‘Commemorative Works Act’’), shall apply to the Wom12 en’s Suffrage National Monument. 

13 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

14 (1) WOMEN’S SUFFRAGE NATIONAL MONU15 MENT.—The term ‘‘Women’s Suffrage National 

16 Monument’’ means the commemorative work author17 ized to be established under Public Law 116–217 

18 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note). 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1318 RDS

1 (2) RESERVE.—The term ‘‘Reserve’’ has the 

2 meaning given such term in section 8902(a)(3) of 

3 title 40, United States Code. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 6, 

2023. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Parent Guide: The Berenstein Bears and Mama's New Job      

# Parent Guide: The Berenstein Bears and Mama's New Job

This guide will help parents teach their child money management skills while reading “The Berenstain Bears & Mama’s New Job” by Stan and Jan Berenstain.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_book-club_mamas-new-job.pdf
#### § 1221.135 Separability.

If any provision of this subpart is declared invalid or the applicability thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this subpart or the applicability thereof to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. Alex White, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 8,043.

Opinion filed November 15, 1929.

Rehearing denied February 4, 1930.

George T. Liddell, for plaintiff in error. William D. Knight, State’s Attorney, and Alfred B. Louison, Assistant State’s Attorney, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Jett

delivered the opinion of the court.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

READYLINK HEALTHCARE, a Nevada

corporation,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY,

a corporation,

 Defendant - Appellee,

and

MARKEL CORPORATION, a

corporation; SHAND MORAHAN &

COMPANY, INC., a corporation,

Defendants.

No. 09-55630

D.C. No. 5:08-cv-00532-SGL-OP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen G. Larson, District Judge, Presiding

FILED

JUL 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Judge for the

District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

2

Submitted on June 11, 2010**

Pasadena, California

Before: TROTT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and MAHAN, District

Judge.*** 

ReadyLink HealthCare (hereinafter "ReadyLink") appeals the district court’s

order granting summary judgment in favor of Evanston Insurance Company

(hereinafter "Evanston") and the other defendants in this case, and denying plaintiff’s

motion for partial summary judgment. The district court entered final judgment after

the appeal was filed, and therefore, appellate jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo the district court’s order on a motion for summary

judgment. 

We agree with the district court and hold that the evidence demonstrated that

ReadyLink made the $75,000 payment to settle the hospital's contractual indemnity

claim, not the underlying malpractice claim. Section 2(d) of the insurance policy

specifically excluded contractual indemnity claims. Therefore, Evanston did not

breach the contract when it denied ReadyLink's claim for the $75,000 payment. 
3

Because there was no coverage under the insurance policy, there can be no bad

faith. See Waller Truck Ins. Exchange, 11 Cal. 4th 1, 35-36 (1995); Love v. Fire Ins.

Exchange, 221 Cal. App. 3d 1136, 1151-1153 (1990). 

AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1427.169 Fees, charges, and interest. ( a ) A producer must pay a non-refundable loan service fee at a rate determined by CCC.
( b ) Interest which accrues for a loan will be determined under part 1405 of this chapter.
[67 FR 64459, Oct. 18, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 136, 139, Jan. 2, 2015]
Exhibit 32.2


Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Noble Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”), I, Kenneth M. Fisher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:February 6, 2014/s/ Kenneth M. FisherKenneth M. FisherChief Financial Officer
#### Martin Parent et al. *v.*Eugene L. St. Pierre et al.

House, C. J., Thim, Ryan, Shapiro and Loiselle, Js.

Argued June 1

decided June 1, 1971

*Snow G. Munford,*for the appellant (named defendant).

*Herbert Wat stein,*for the appellee (plaintiff Rowena Parent).

Per Curiam.

On the evidence presented, the jury could reasonably have found that the damages awarded constituted fair, just and reasonable compensation for the injuries the plaintiff Rowena Parent sustained. Accordingly, there was no error in the refusal of the court to set the verdict aside. *Zimmerman*v. *Wallman,*156 Conn. 637, 244 A.2d 371.

There is no error.
#### § 1409.1 Applicability.

This subpart specifies the eligibility requirements and payment calculations for the Market Facilitation Program (MFP) for 2018 crops. MFP will provide payments with respect to commodities which have been significantly impacted by actions of foreign governments resulting in the loss of traditional exports. The determination of eligible commodities and any specific program requirements for a commodity will be specified in a notice of funding availability published by CCC in the Federal Register.

[83 FR 44176, Aug. 30, 2018, as amended at 84 FR 36461, July 29, 2019]
#### § 1206.32 Term of office.

The term of office for first handler, importer, domestic producer, and foreign producer members of the Board will be three years. Members may serve a maximum of two consecutive three-year terms. Each term of office will end on December 31, with new terms of office beginning on January 1

[86 FR 11097, Feb. 24, 2021]
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of ZIM Corporation (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Cowpland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael Cowpland


--------------------


Michael Cowpland


Chief Executive Officer


Date: July 19, 2010
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFundamental aspects of and failure modes in high-temperature compositesFundamental aspects of and attendant failure mechanisms for high temperature composites are summarized. These include: (1) in-situ matrix behavior; (2) load transfer; (3) limits on matrix ductility to survive a given number of cyclic loadings; (4) fundamental parameters which govern thermal stresses; (5) vibration stresses; and (6) impact resistance. The resulting guidelines are presented in terms of simple equations which are suitable for the preliminary assessment of the merits of a particular high temperature composite in a specific application.Document ID19900010835Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsChamis, Christos C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Ginty, Carol A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102558NASA-TM-102558E-5378Meeting InformationMeeting: International SAMPE Symposium and ExhibitionLocation: Anaheim, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: April 2, 1990End Date: April 5, 1990Accession Number90N20151Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 510-01-0ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900010835.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 1491.2 Administration. ( a ) The regulations in this part will be administered under the general supervision and direction of the NRCS Chief.
( b ) NRCS will— ( 1 ) Provide overall program management and implementation leadership for FRPP;
( 2 ) Develop, maintain, and ensure that policies, guidelines, and procedures are carried out to meet program goals and objectives;
( 3 ) Ensure that the FRPP share of the cost of an easement or other deed restrictions in eligible land will not exceed 50 percent of the appraised fair market value of the conservation easement;
( 4 ) Determine eligibility of the land, landowner, State government, local government, Indian Tribe, or nongovernmental organization;
( 5 ) Ensure a conservation plan is developed in accordance with 7 CFR part 12;
( 6 ) Make funding decisions and determine allocations of program funds;
( 7 ) Coordinate with the Office of the General Counsel to ensure the legal sufficiency of the cooperative agreement and the easement deed or other legal instrument;
( 8 ) Sign and monitor cooperative agreements for the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) with the selected eligible entity;
( 9 ) Monitor and ensure conservation plan compliance with highly erodible land and wetland provisions in accordance with 7 CFR part 12; and
( 10 ) Provide leadership for establishing, implementing, and overseeing administrative processes for easements, easement payments, and administrative and financial performance reporting.
( c ) NRCS will enter into cooperative agreements with eligible entities to assist NRCS with implementation of this part.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: The Mentoring Toolkit 2.0: Resources for Developing Programs for Incarcerated Youth      

# Resource: The Mentoring Toolkit 2.0: Resources for Developing Programs for Incarcerated Youth

This toolkit, developed by the National Technical Assistance Center for the Education of Neglected or Delinquent Children and Youth, provides information, program descriptions, and links to important resources that can assist juvenile correctional facilities and other organizations with designing effective mentoring programs for neglected and delinquent youth, particularly those who are incarcerated. **Learn more.**