SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST ( In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: District Department of the Environment

Date Received: June 18 , 2014 Subject: District of Columbia’s S tate Implementation Plan Revision s to Address the 20 08 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality

Standard (NAAQS) Infrastructure Requirements and Air Quality Emergency Plan

Completeness Review Completed by: Emlyn Vélez

- Rosa Date Completed: October 27 , 201 4

Adminis trative Materials

ACCEPTABL E

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision

thereof. 1. A letter dated June 13 , 2014 from Keith A. Anderson

, D irector of the District Department of the Environment ( DDo E) to Shawn M. Garvin, EPA Regional Administrator. X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent agreement in f

inal form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree has a sunset or expirati on date. If so it is not acceptable as a

SIP submission. 2

. Not a regulatory change, however applicable portions of

section 110(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) are adopted in
the District of Columbia’s State Implementation Plan ( SIP )

under 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J

. X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. The District of Columbia (the District) has the authority
pursuant to the District of Columbia Ai r Pollution Control Act

of 1984

. X

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including 4. State regulations have been previously adopted and are being certified or referenced in the submittal. XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the off icial State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the ado ption/issuance of the plan. 5. T he submittal l etter dated June 13 , 2014 confirms that all required administrative procedures were properly followed for

this SIP revision. A copy of public hearing notice and transcript were included. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. Provided is a c opy of the notice of public hearing and evidence of its publication on the DDoE website on April 11,

2014. In the notice DDoE requested both public written and

oral comments by May 1 2 , 2014

. X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. A hearing officer’s certification for the public hearing was

p rovided. The public hearing was held on May 12, 2014, as

described in notice. X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State ’ s response thereto. 8. A compilation of publ ic written comments and DDoE’s response was provided

. No public comments were received at the hearing. X

Technical Materials

1. Identification of all regulated po llutants affected by the plan. 1. Ozone and its precursors, nitrogen oxides ( NO
x ) and volatile organic compounds (VOC); specifically, the 2008 ozone N ational Ambient Air Quality Standard (N AAQS ) X

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources in cluding the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. Most of the State regulations certified or referenced in the SIP submittal apply statewide. XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of th e differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result

of the revision. 3. Not applicable. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for implementation of the 20 08 ozone NAAQS. This

SIP submittal does not relat e to modification of existing

emission limits. X

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for implementation of the 20 08 ozone NAAQS. The SIP revision submittal certifies existing air pollution control programs in the District’s SIP, as pr ovided in 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (whe re used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. Not applicable. No modeling required to support SIP

revision. X

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limita tions are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 6

. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for implementation of the 20 08 ozone NAAQS. The SIP revision

submittal certifies that the D istrict has adopted in the SIP

control me asures and e mission limitations for ozone and its

precursors, NO x and VOC , as provided in 4 0 CFR Part 52 Subpart J

. X

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensur e emission levels. 7. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for implementation of the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The SIP revision submittal certifies that the District has adopted in the SIP XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

control measures and emission limitations for ozone and its

prec ursors, NOx and VOC , as provided in 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J.

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice. 8

. The SIP revision addresses necessary elements for implementation of the 2008 ozone NAAQS. T he SIP revision submittal certifies that the District has adopted in the SIP

c ompliance/enforcement measures for ozone and its precursors

, NOx and VOC, as provided in 40 CFR Part 52 Subpart J. X

9. Special economic and technological justifications requir ed by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 9. No t applicable. No special justifications are required. X

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant

N AAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. Not a pplicable. N ot a Section 107 request. X