alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

All of the Company's subsidiaries are wholly owned by the registrant or a
subsidiary of the registrant:

Vermont Pure Springs, Inc. ("Springs") - incorporated in the State of Delaware.

Crystal Rock Spring Water Company ("Crystal Rock") - incorporated in the State
of Connecticut.

Excelsior Springs Water Company, Inc. - incorporated in the State of New York
and wholly owned by the Company's subsidiary, Springs.

Adirondack Coffee Services, Inc. - incorporated in the State of New York and
wholly owned by the Company's subsidiary, Springs.

Crystal-Waterville, Inc. - incorporated in the State of Connecticut and wholly
owned by the Company's subsidiary, Crystal Rock.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: An Unlikely Partnership: Strengthening Families Touched by Incarceration Video      

# Resource: An Unlikely Partnership: Strengthening Families Touched by Incarceration Video

This film, *An Unlikely Partnership: Strengthening Families Touched by Incarceration*, describes the impact of parental incarceration on children and families. It features an innovative partnership in Washington State between the Department of Corrections and the Department of Early Learning that highlights how partners can come together around a shared agenda for the safety and wellbeing of children and families. *An Unlikely Partnership* is part of the “Building Community, Building Hope” film series developed by OCAN and its contractor, CANTASD, in collaboration with The Department of Expansion, a Los Angeles-based film production company. **Learn more.**
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1471.5 Affidavit of pima cotton trade associations.

In addition to any applicable information requirements in § 1471.1, trade associations filing a claim for a payment under the Agriculture Pima Trust must provide a statement that states that during the calendar year immediately preceding the payment they were, as determined by the Secretary, a domestic nationally recognized association established and operating for the promotion of pima cotton for domestic use in textile and apparel goods.
#### In the Matter of Stella J. Kindzia, Respondent, v. State Liquor Authority, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without costs, petition dismissed and determination of the State Liquor Authority confirmed. Memorandum: Petitioner and her husband are joint owners of the Whirlpool Bar and Restaurant which before July 4, 1963, was operated by the husband. On that date his liquor license was cancelled because of his failure to notify the Authority of his conviction of a crime. The husband continues to reside on the premises with petitioner. Although the petition alleges that the husband will transfer his interest in the property and business to petitioner and that he will not participate in the business if a license is issued to her, there is no testimony, affidavit or other proof demonstrating that he would not participate in the management and operation of it. The whole record discloses a reasonable basis for the judgment of the Authority that petitioner’s operation of the business would not be free from his participation and interest. The refusal to grant a liquor license to petitioner under the circumstances was not arbitrary or capricious. *(Matter of Wager*v. *State Liq. Auth.,*4 N Y 2d 465.) (Appeal from judgment of Niagara Special Term granting liquor license.) Present—-Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Veeehio and Marsh, JJ.
#### § 1400.7 Revocable trust.

A revocable trust and the grantor will be considered to be the same person under this part.

[85 FR 52038, Aug. 24, 2020]
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of 4C Controls Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anastasios Angeloglou,
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:
 
 (1) 
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Date:
November 23, 2009


By:
                  /s/
      Anastasios
      AngeloglouName:   Anastasios
      AngeloglouTitle:     Principal
      Executive Officer and
                    Acting
      Principal Financial
Officer
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-147300 on Form S-8 of our report dated June 30, 2008, relating
to the consolidated financial statements of CryoPort, Inc. (which
report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs
relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment and the substantial doubt about the CryoPort, Inc’s ability to
continue as a going concern), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Cryoport, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2008.







/s/ KMJ Corbin & Company
LLP


KMJ  Corbin & Company
LLP


Irvine,
California


June 30,
2008
§ 1230.56 Procedure. ( a ) A majority of the members shall constitute a quorum at a properly convened meeting of the Board. Any action of the Board shall require the concurring votes of at least a majority of those present and voting. The Board shall give timely notice of its meetings. The Board shall give the Secretary the same notice of its meetings, including the meetings of its committees, as it gives to its members in order that the Secretary, or a representative of the Secretary, may attend the meetings.
( b ) The Board may take action upon the concurring votes of a majority of its members by mail, telephone, telegraph or by other means of communication when, in the opinion of the President of the Board, such action must be taken before a meeting can be called. Action taken by this emergency procedure is valid only if all members are notified and provided the opportunity to vote and any telephone vote is confirmed promptly in writing and recorded in the Board minutes. Any action so taken shall have the same force and effect as though such action had been taken at a properly convened meeting of the Board.
Exhibit 4.26.1.2


 


PROMISSORY NOTE SECOND EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


This Promissory
Note Extension Agreement, hereinafter referred to as "Extension", entered into this Twenty Seventh day of August, 2012,
by and among Intellinetics, Inc., hereinafter called "Maker" and Alpharion Capital Partners, hereinafter called "Lender".


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender have entered into a Promissory Note and Subscription Agreement dated December 1, 2011 tor the amount of SEVEN
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($7,500), hereinafter referred to as "Note". Said Note was originally due one
hundred eighty days from its issuance.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender have entered into a Promissory Note Extension Agreement dated May 29, 2012 for the amount of SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE
HUNDRED AND N0/100


DOLLARS ($7,500), hereinafter
referred to as the "Note Extension".Said Note Extension was originally due two-hundred seventy days from its issuance.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender desire to enter into this Second Extension Agreement in order to extend the due date of the Note.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, it is dually agreed by both Maker and Lender to extend the due date of the Note from two hundred seventy days to a
due date of November 16,2012.


 


All other provisions of the original Promissory
Note, Subscription Agreement and


Promissory Note Extension Agreement shall prevail
unless otherwise written.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Maker and Lender has duly executed th.is Note as of the day and year above first written.


 


	 	INTELLINETICS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/William J. Santiago
	 	 
	 	ALPHARION CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/Rick  Hughes
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 12

- 00080

- CR

LOLA DANIELLE CHERRY, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 27792

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.2 

### O R D E R Lola Danielle Cherry, appellant, was convicted of attempted capital murder of a perso n under six years of age and was sentenced on January 18, 2012, to twenty

- four years ’ in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Correctional Institutions Division. Her notice of appeal was timely filed January 18, 2012. The clerk’s record was filed May 16, 2012, and the reporter’s record was filed June 29, 2012, making the appellant’s brief due July 30, 2012. Counsel is appointed. Appellant’s counsel has filed four motions to extend the briefing deadline in this matter, and, for good cause shown, we g ranted all four of those motions. The last motion to extend was filed on September 25, 2012, and resulted in a new filing deadline of October 19, 2012. Having received nothing from appellant’s counsel, the clerk’s office sent a late

- brief notice November 13, 2012, giving counsel until November 26, 2012, to file appellant’s brief. Since that time, we have received neither the appellant’s brief nor a request for further extension of the filing deadline. Inquiries from our clerk’s office to appellant’s cou nsel regarding the overdue brief have proven unproductive. While we are sympathetic to the medical issues appellant’s counsel has experienced, we have no choice but to take action in this matter. Because the brief of appellant has not been received, we abate this case to the trial court pursuant to Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for a hearing to determine why counsel has not filed the brief , whether the brief can be promptly filed with this Court, whether Cherry desires to prosecute her appea l, and whether she is indigent. Se e T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(b)(2). The hearing is to be conducted within fifteen days of the date of this order. The3 trial court may also address other ma t ters as it deems appropriate, including appointing different counsel for appellant if necessary. The trial court ’ s findings and recommendations on the issues set forth above shall be entered into the record of the case and presented to this Court in the f orm of a supplemental clerk ’ s record within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(b)(3). The reporter ’ s re cord of the hearing shall also be filed with this Court in the form of a supplemental reporter ’ s record within fifteen d ays of the date of the hearing. See id. All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of (1) the appellant’s brief or ( 2 ) the supplemental appellate record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: January 24, 2013
§ 1280.220 Collections. ( a ) Each first handler, market agency, and exporter responsible for the collection of assessments under this subpart shall remit assessments to the Board by the 15th day of the month following the month in which the lambs were purchased for slaughter or export.
( b ) If a first handler marketed lambs or lamb products directly to consumers, assessments shall be remitted to the Board by the 15th day of the month following the month in which the lambs or lamb products were marketed, as required by regulations recommended by the Board and prescribed by the Secretary, has provided otherwise.
( c ) *Late payment charges.* Any unpaid assessments due to the Board pursuant to § 1280.217 shall be increased 2 percent each month beginning with the day following the date such assessments were due. Any remaining amount due, which shall include any unpaid charges previously made pursuant to this paragraph, shall be increased at the same rate on the corresponding day of each month thereafter until paid. For the purposes of this paragraph, any assessment determined at a date later than the date prescribed by this subpart, because of a person's failure to timely submit a report to the Board, shall be considered to have been payable by the date it would have been due if the report had been timely filed. The timeliness of a payment to the Board shall be based on the applicable postmark date or the date actually received by the Board, whichever is earlier.
( d ) Persons failing to remit total assessments due in a timely manner may also be subject to actions under Federal debt collection procedures.
[67 FR 17857, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 86 FR 72515, Dec. 22, 2021]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6500** 

RANDALL GRAY STONEMAN, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. GEORGE SOLOMON , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Thomas D. Schroeder , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00836

- TDS

- LPA )

Submitted : June 26 , 2014 Decided: June 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Randall Gray Stoneman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Randall Gray Stoneman , Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing in part as untimely , and denying relief in part on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabil ity. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stoneman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Stoneman’s motion for appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed i n forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral3 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1430.225 Violations of highly erodible land and wetland conservation provisions.

The provisions of part 12 of this title apply to this part.
1

Order entered October 1 9 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00118
- CV RMAX OPERATING, LLC, Appellant

V.
GAF MATERIALS CORPOR ATION OF AMERICA, Appellee On Ap peal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 04125



### O RDER The reporter’s record in this appeal was first due March 12, 2016. We granted court reporter Vielica Dobbins three extensions of time to file the re cord. When Ms. Dobbins failed to file the record following those extensions, we granted appellant’s motion to compel production of the reporter’s record and ordered Ms. Dobbins to file the record by September 30, 2016. Ms.
Dobbins did not file the record and did not communicate with the Court regarding the status of preparation of the record. On October 17, 2016, we ordered Ms. Dobbins to file the record by October 24, 2016 and ordered that Ms. Dobbins not sit as a court reporter in any capacity until s he has filed the reporter’s record in this appeal. Ms. Robbins now seeks an extension until October 28, 2016 to2

file the record in this case. We DENY court reporter Vielica Dobbins’s October 17, 2016 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’ s record in this case.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Sikora, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tao Minerals Ltd.
      for the period ended July 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Tao Minerals Ltd.                                                                

Dated: October 25, 2009

| | /s/
      James Sikora                                   
| | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | James Sikora                                             
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
      Financial
| | Officer and Director                                     
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial  
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)                
| | Tao Minerals Ltd.                                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tao Minerals
Ltd. and will be retained by Tao Minerals Ltd. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
nbllogoupdated9302014a52.jpgNEWS RELEASE





NOBLE ENERGY ELECTS BARBARA J. DUGANIER TO BOARD OF DIRECTORS








Houston, May 30, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) - Noble Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NBL) (“Noble Energy” or "the Company") announced the election of Barbara J. Duganier to its Board of Directors, effective today. With the addition of Ms. Duganier, Noble Energy's Board now totals 10 members.





Prior to her retirement in 2013, Ms. Duganier held various leadership and management positions with Accenture PLC, where she was most recently a Managing Director and also served as Global Chief Strategy Officer and Global Growth and Offering Development Lead for the consulting business. For more than 20 years, Ms. Duganier was with the public accounting firm Arthur Andersen, where she was an equity partner and served as an auditor and financial consultant primarily in the energy industry. She also held various leadership roles, including as Global Chief Financial Officer of Andersen Worldwide. She hold a B.S.B.A in accounting from John Carroll University and is a licensed certified public accountant. Ms. Duganier currently serves as a director of the general partner of Buckeye Partners, L.P. and is also a director of MRC Global Inc.





David L. Stover, Noble Energy’s Chairman, President and CEO, commented:  “Our Board is excited to add Barbara to the Noble Energy team. She brings significant financial and strategy expertise to the Board, along with extensive experience in helping numerous upstream and midstream energy companies accelerate and transform their business performance.”





Noble Energy (NYSE: NBL) is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company with a diversified high-quality portfolio of both U.S. unconventional and global offshore conventional assets spanning three continents.  Founded more than 80 years ago, the company is committed to safely and responsibly delivering our purpose: Energizing the World, Bettering People’s Lives ®. For more information, visit www.nblenergy.com .





Investor Contacts


Brad Whitmarsh


(281) 943-1670


Brad.Whitmarsh@nblenergy.com








---










Megan Dolezal


(281) 943-1861


Megan.Dolezal@nblenergy.com





Media Contacts


Reba Reid


(713) 412-8441


media@nblenergy.com