alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit1037Q42012


Exhibit 10.37


THIRD AMENDMENT TO 
EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT 


THIS THIRD AMENDMENT (this “Third Amendment”) to that certain EMPLOYMENT AND NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT executed as of May 14, 2012 and amended by the First Amendment dated May 17, 2012, and further amended by the Second Amendment dated November 7, 2012 (the “Agreement”), is executed as of this 29th day of March 2013, by and between KAYAK Software Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Paul M. English, an individual (“Employee”).


In consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements and covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the Company and Employee, 


IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 


1.Section 3.2(a) is hereby amended by deleting the phrase “120%” appearing in clause (ii) therein and inserting, in lieu thereof, the phrase “125%”. 


2.Section 3.2(b) is hereby amended by deleting the phrase “120%” appearing in clause (iii) therein and inserting, in lieu thereof, the phrase “125%”.


3.Except as modified by this Third Amendment, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 






[Remainder of the Page Intentionally Left Blank]






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Third Amendment as of the day and year written above. 


	
		
	 

	 
	 

	 
	COMPANY:

	 
	 

	 
	KAYAK SOFTWARE CORPORATION

	 
	 



	 
	By: _/s/ Karen Ruzic Klein__ 

	 
	Name: Karen Ruzic Klein

	 
	Title: General Counsel

	 
	 

	 
	

EMPLOYEE:





	 
	_/s/ Paul M. English_____

	 
	Paul M. English

	 
	 

	 
	 









A/75400025.1
To:  Docket EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2003‐0215, EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2014‐0451

From: Hillary Ward, USEPA/OAQPS

Subject:  Federalism Outreach under Executive Order 13132 for MSW Landfills

Date: December 2013

The EPA conducted a Federalism Consultation Outreach Meeting for associations that represent local

and state elected officials potentially affected by EPA’s review of MSW landfill regulations on September

10, 2013. Due to interest in that meeting, additional outreach meetings were held on November 7, 2013

and November 14, 2013.  

Participants included the National Governors’ Association, the National Conference of State Legislatures,

the Council of State Governments, the National League of Cities, the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the

National Association of Counties, the International City/County Management Association, the National

Association of Towns and Townships, the County Executives of America, the Environmental Council of

States, National Association of Clean Air Agencies, Association of State and Territorial Solid Waste

Management Officials, environmental agency representatives from 43 states, and approximately 60

representatives from city and county governments.

Appendix A to this memorandum contains the invitation letter sent to invite participants to the outreach

meeting.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1437.201 Prevented planting acreage. ( a ) In addition to the provisions of this section, the provisions of § 718.103 of this title apply.
( b ) When determining losses under this section: ( 1 ) Producers must be prevented from planting more than 35 percent of the total eligible acreage intended for planting to the eligible crop and in the case of multiple planting, more than 35 percent of the total eligible acres intended to be planted within the applicable planting period.
( 2 ) Prevented planted acreage will be considered separately from low-yield losses of planted acreage of the same crop.
( c ) Acreage and units ineligible for prevented planting coverage includes, but is not limited to: ( 1 ) Value-loss crops, including, but not limited to, Christmas trees, aquaculture, and ornamental nursery;
( 2 ) Tree crops and other perennials, unless: ( i ) The producer can prove resources unique to the planting of tree crops and other perennials were available to plant, grow, and harvest the crop, as determined by FSA; and
( ii ) FSA has approved the planting period for the crop;
( 3 ) Uninsured crop acreage that is unclassified for insurance purposes;
( 4 ) Any acreage on which a crop was harvested, hayed, or grazed during the crop year;
( 5 ) Acreage of which the producer or any other person received a prevented planted payment for any crop for the same acreage, excluding share arrangements; and
( 6 ) Acreage planted during the late-planting period.
[71 FR 13746, Mar. 17, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 74581,74583, Dec. 15, 2014]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHigh temperature aircraft research furnace facilitiesFocus is on the design, fabrication, and development of the High Temperature Aircraft Research Furnace Facilities (HTARFF). The HTARFF was developed to process electrically conductive materials with high melting points in a low gravity environment. The basic principle of operation is to accurately translate a high temperature arc-plasma gas front as it orbits around a cylindrical sample, thereby making it possible to precisely traverse the entire surface of a sample. The furnace utilizes the gas-tungsten-arc-welding (GTAW) process, also commonly referred to as Tungsten-Inert-Gas (TIG). The HTARFF was developed to further research efforts in the areas of directional solidification, float-zone processing, welding in a low-gravity environment, and segregation effects in metals. The furnace is intended for use aboard the NASA-JSC Reduced Gravity Program KC-135A Aircraft.Document ID19920024582Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSmith, James E., Jr.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Cashon, John L.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1992Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:184384NASA-CR-184384Accession Number92N33826Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-36955Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920024582.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
SUMMARY TO PUBLISH IN THE FEDERAL 

REGISTER

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for 

publication in the Federal Register, should it be determined that 

publication is needed:

Applicant seeks an exemption from the following rules:

14 CFR § 21, subpart H; 14 CFR § 45.23 (b); 14 CFR § 61.113 

(a) & (b); 91.7 (a); 91.9 (b) (2); 91.103 (b); 91.109; 91.119; 

91.121; 91.151 (a); 91.203 (a) & (b); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) 

(1); 91.409 (a) (2) and 91.417 (a) & (b) to operate 

commercially a small unmanned vehicle (5lbs or less) in 

Educational and Marketing operations. 

Privacy 

All flights will occur over private or controlled access 

property with the property owner’s prior consent and 

knowledge, or over remote public land. Image cap

ture of people will rarely take place, but in the event they are, they 

will have consented prior to being filmed or otherwise have 

agreed to be in the area where data collection will take 

place. 

Airborne Image Capture

With regard to airborne filming, James C Suss, and The Edit Haus, LLC

adheres to all FAA regulations. Further, James C Suss, and The Edit 

Haus, LLC will operate under the principals of: Safety First, Quality 

Assurance, Accountability, Reporting, and Training. When 

approved by the FAA it is James C Suss, and The Edit Haus, LLC

mandate to treat all sUAS operations with the exact same level of 

professionalism and seriousness as that of conventional aircraft. 

Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of 

sUASs in the real estate industry will enhance safety by 

reducing risk. A sUAS weighing fewer than 5lbs and powered by 

batteries eliminates virtually all of the risk given the substantial 

reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. 

The sUAS is typically transported to the location via auto or 

cargo van in a medium sized case and is never flown to set. 

The sUAS will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not 

expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1450.210 Acceptability of offers. ( a ) Acceptance or rejection of any contract offered will be at the sole discretion of CCC, and offers may be rejected for any reason as determined appropriate to accomplish the purposes of BCAP.
( b ) An offer to enroll land in BCAP will be irrevocable for such period as is determined and announced by CCC. The producer will be liable to CCC for liquidated damages if the applicant revokes an offer during the period in which the offer is irrevocable as determined by CCC. CCC may waive payment of such liquidated damages if CCC determines that the assessment of such damages, in a particular case, is not in the best interest of CCC and BCAP.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (Duke Energy Ohio) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James E. Rogers, Chief Executive
Officer of Duke Energy Ohio, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Energy Ohio.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    JAMES E. ROGERS 
|James E. Rogers        
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 14, 2007
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1465.23 Payments. ( a ) The Federal share of payments to a participant will be: ( 1 ) Up to 75 percent of the estimated incurred cost or 100 percent of the estimated income foregone of an eligible practice, except as provided in (a)(2) of this section.
( 2 ) In the case of historically underserved producers, the payment rate will be the applicable rate and an additional rate that is not less than 25 percent above the applicable rate, provided that this increase does not exceed 90 percent of the estimated incurred costs or estimated income foregone.
( 3 ) In no instance will the total financial contributions for an eligible practice from other sources exceed 100 percent of the estimated incurred cost of the practice.
( b ) Participants may contribute their portion of the estimated costs of practices through in-kind contributions, including labor and materials, providing the materials contributed meet the NRCS standard and specifications for the practice being installed.
( c ) Payments for practices applied prior to application or contract approval— ( 1 ) Payments will not be made to a participant for a conservation practice that was applied prior to application for the program.
( 2 ) Payments will not be made to a participant for a conservation practice that was initiated or implemented prior to contract approval, unless the participant obtained a waiver from the State Conservationist, or designated conservationist, prior to practice implementation.
( d ) The total amount of payments paid to a person or legal entity under this part may not exceed $50,000 for any fiscal year.
( e ) For purposes of applying the payment limitations provided for in this section, NRCS will use the provisions in 7 CFR part 1400, Payment Limitation and Payment Eligibility.
( f ) A participant will not be eligible for payments for conservation practices on eligible land if the participant receives payments or other benefits for the same practice on the same land under any other conservation program administered by USDA.
( g ) The participant and NRCS must certify that a conservation practice is completed in accordance with the contract before NRCS will approve any payment.
( h ) Subject to fund availability, the payment rates for conservation practices scheduled after the year of contract obligation may be adjusted to reflect increased costs.
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 9, 2010
    By:

/s/
Edward J. WhalenEdward J. WhalenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Stratigraphicand structural relations of the Hoodoo Quartzite and Yellowjacket Formation ofMiddle Proterozoic age from Hoodoo Creek eastward to Mount Taylor, centralIdaho ; with a geologic map of the region between the middle fork of the SalmonRiver and the Salmon River**
 
Report | Plates: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1570
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000962448
 
August 27, 2018
Exhibit 4.28.1


 


PROMISSORY NOTE COMBINATION #5 EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


 


 


This Promissory
Note Combination #5 Extension Agreement, hereinafter referred to as “Combination #5 Extension”, entered into this Sixteenth
day of November, 2012, by and among Intellinetics, Inc, hereinafter called “Maker” and Alpharion Capital Partners,
hereinafter called “Lender”.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender have entered into a Promissory Note Combination #5 dated September 2, 2012 for the amount of FIFTY THOUSAND and
00/100 DOLLARS ($50,000), hereinafter referred to as “Note Combination #5”. Said Note Combination #5 was originally
due on a due date of November 16, 2012.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender desire to enter into this Combination #5 Extension Agreement in order to extend the due date of the Note Combination
#5 for an additional thirty days to December 16, 2012.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
it is dually agreed by both Maker and Lender to extend the due date of the Note Combination #5 to December 16, 2012.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Maker and Lender
has duly executed this


Combination #5 Extension as of the day and year above
first written.


 


	 	INTELLINETICS,
    INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/William J. Santiago
	 	 
	 	ALPHARION CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/Rick Hughes
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Mental Health Matters, Why Black Dad’s Positive Mental Health Is Good for Youth Academic Outcomes      

# Resource: Mental Health Matters, Why Black Dad’s Positive Mental Health Is Good for Youth Academic Outcomes

This brief, the second in a series of three from Fathers Incorporated addressing fatherhood engagement for low-income African American students and their families, is designed for academicians and practitioners to focus continued attention on recognizing a father's mental health and its impact on how well his child does in school. **Learn more.**
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1339 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2023 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to review certain rules of the Commission and develop recommendations for rule changes to promote precision agriculture, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1339 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Precision Agriculture 

3 Satellite Connectivity Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PRECISION AGRICULTURE SATELLITE 

5 CONNECTIVITY. 

6 (a) REVIEW.—The Commission, in consultation with 

7 the Task Force, shall— 

8 (1) review the rules of the Commission relating 

9 to fixed satellite service, mobile satellite service, and 

10 earth exploration satellite service to determine if 

11 there are rule changes that the Commission could 

12 implement under existing authority to promote pre13 cision agriculture; and 

14 (2) if the Commission determines under para15 graph (1) that there are rule changes that the Com16 mission could implement, develop recommendations 

17 for how to implement the changes. 

18 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 15 months after the 

19 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall 

20 submit to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the 

21 House of Representatives and the Committee on Com22 merce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report 

23 on the results of the review conducted under subsection 

24 (a), including any recommendations developed under para25 graph (2) of such subsection. 

26 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1339 RFS

1 (1) COMMISSION.—The term ‘‘Commission’’ 

2 means the Federal Communications Commission. 

3 (2) TASK FORCE.—The term ‘‘Task Force’’ 

4 means the Task Force for Reviewing the 

5 Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Ag6 riculture in the United States established under sec7 tion 12511 of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 

8 2018 (Public Law 115–334). 

Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2023. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS