alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1033.8 Nonpool plant.

See § 1000.8.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-0832V

UNPUBLISHED

LISA CARTER,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: September 30, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Isaiah Richard Kalinowski, Bosson Legal Group, Fairfax, VA, for Petitioner.

Mitchell Jones, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On February 1, 2021, Lisa Carter filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that she suffered a shoulder injury related to 

vaccine administration (“SIRVA) as a result of an influenza vaccination she received on 

October 5, 2018. Petition at ¶3, 14. Petitioner further alleges that her “vaccine related 

injuries persisted for more than six months following the vaccination at issue.” Petition at

¶16. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special 

Masters.

On September 30, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) 

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that it is his position that “Petitioner has 

satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications 

and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”) for SIRVA caused by the intramuscular administration 

of a flu vaccine. Id. at 10. Respondent further agrees that Petitioner received the vaccine 

in the United States and that Petitioner “satisfies the statutory severity requirement by 

suffering the residual effects or complications of her injury for more than six months after 

vaccine administration.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
March 13, 2013


 


Bluerock Multifamily Growth REIT, Inc.


27777 Franklin Road


Suite 900


Southfield, MI 48034


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter confirms that Bluerock Real Estate, LLC (or one
or more of its subsidiaries) will provide financial support to Bluerock Multifamily Growth REIT, Inc. (the Company) sufficient
for it to satisfy its obligations and debt service requirements as they come due until at least March 14, 2014, and will satisfy,
on a timely basis all liabilities and obligations of the Company that the Company is unable to satisfy when due from the date of
this letter, through and including March 14, 2014.


 


Bluerock Real Estate, LLC is in management control of the affiliates
that are lenders to the Company. Bluerock Real Estate, LLC has the authority to extend and will extend the notes beyond October
2, 2013.


 


Management of Bluerock Real Estate, LLC filed a registration
statement to extend the primary offering of the Company to the earlier of April 13, 2013 or the date the SEC declares the registration
statement for the follow-on offering effective. Bluerock Real Estate, LLC will fund expenses related to filing the registration
statement if the Company is unable to satisfy those expenses as they come due.


 


The undersigned represent that Bluerock Real Estate, LLC (or
one or more of its subsidiaries) has the ability to provide the necessary financial support to the Company to the extent and when
deemed necessary by the Company and that there are no restrictions on Bluerock Real Estate, LLC (or one or more of its subsidiaries)
to provide such support.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ Ramin Kamfar


 


Ramin Kamfar


Bluerock Real Estate, LLC


Chief Executive Officer


 


 


27777
Franklin Road, Ste. 900 ·
Southfield, MI 48034 ·
Tel: 248.226-5700 ·
www.bluerockre.com  ·
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE R. BELTRAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71554

Agency No. A073-981-758

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jose R. Beltran, a native and citizen fo Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

FILED

SEP 24 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-71554

judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss

the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that

Beltran failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying

relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005). 

Beltran’s contention that the agency failed to consider relevant hardship factors is

not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable claim over which

we have jurisdiction. See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir.

2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1416.301 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart establishes the terms and conditions of the Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP).
( b ) Eligible livestock owners and contract growers will be compensated in accordance with § 1416.306 for eligible livestock deaths in excess of normal mortality, or livestock owners will be compensated for sales of injured livestock for a reduced price, if either the death or injury that results in sale at a reduced price occurred as a direct result of an eligible cause of loss. The eligible cause of loss is one, as determined by FSA, that directly results in the death of livestock or injury and sale of livestock at a reduced price, despite the livestock owner's or contract grower's performance of expected and normal preventative or corrective measures and acceptable animal husbandry practices.
[83 FR 49468, Oct. 2, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 10966, Feb. 26, 2020]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sylvester Dukes, Also Known as Sylvester McEddy, Also Known as Sylvester Barceem, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 25, 1977, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. Defendant was charged with murder in the second degree (felony murder). At trial the jury was presented with a factual question as to whether defendant established the affirmative defense to felony murder set forth in subdivision 3 of section 125.25 of the Penal Law. An erroneous charge indicated to the jury that the application of the affirmative defense was discretionary. A new trial is therefore required (see *People v Santanella,*63 AD2d 744; *People v Vinniane,*70 AD2d 956). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. O’Connor, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
#### Nancy Wetstone et al. *v.*Town Plan and Zoning Commission of the Town of West Hartford

The motion by the defendant to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is granted unless the plaintiffs file their assignments of error not later than April 27, 1971.

*584
      *Robert Y. Pelgrift,*corporation counsel, for the appellee (defendant).

*Walter A. Twachtman,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Argued April 6

decided April 6, 1971
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, Steven J. Golub, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 of Lazard Group Finance LLC (the Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) [Reserved]



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 12, 2005



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/  Steven J. Golub                                   
|Steven J. Golub President (Principal Executive Officer)
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Food Safety Frequently Asked Questions      

# Resource: Food Safety Frequently Asked Questions

This fact sheet reviews key aspects of the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) and explores how this law intersects with common farm to school activities such as direct purchasing of produce and meats from local small-producers and considerations when operating an edible campus garden.**Learn more.**
ex10_22.htm





Exhibit 10.22


 



Katy Industries, Inc.





Director Compensation Arrangements




 



1.Retainer










	
  

	
a.

	
Each director earns a $10,000 annual retainer.













	
  

	
b.

	
Each director earns the cash equivalent of 2,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at the closing stock price the day prior to the annual meeting.













	
  

	
c.

	
The chair of the Compensation Committee and the chair of the Audit Committee each earn an additional $6,000 annual retainer.













	
2.

	
Meeting Fees













	
  

	
a.

	
Each director earns $2,500 for each full meeting of the board of directors he or she attends in person and $1,000 for each full meeting of the board of directors he or she attends telephonically.













	
  

	
b.

	
Each director earns $1,000 for each full committee meeting of the board of directors he or she attends in person and $500 for each full committee meeting of the board of directors he or she attends telephonically.







 



	
3.

	
Stock Appreciation Rights













	
  

	
a.

	
Each director receives an annual stock appreciation right (SAR) grant of 2,000 stock appreciation rights at the May meeting of the board of directors each year.  The exercise price is the fair market value on the date of grant.  The director may exercise these stock appreciation rights at any time during the ten years from the date of grant.







 



	
4.

	
Meeting Expenses













	
  

	
a.

	
Katy reimburses directors for their expenses incurred in attending meetings of the board of director and committee meetings of the board of directors.













	
5.

	
Deferred Compensation Plan













	
  

	
a.

	
Each director may defer directors’ fees, retainers and other compensation paid for services as a director until the later of the director’s attainment of age 62 or ceasing to be a director.  Each director has 30 days before the beginning of a Plan Year (as defined in the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan) in which to elect to participate in the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan.  Directors may invest these amounts in one or more investment alternatives offered by Katy.  Directors may elect to receive distributions of deferred amounts in a lump sum or five annual installments.












Note:  Class II directors and those directors that are also officers do not receive the compensation described in this section for their service on the Board of Directors.
# Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Arena Resources, Inc. (the Company), on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lloyd T. Rochford, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)              The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)              The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Lloyd T.
Rochford

Lloyd T. RochfordChief
Executive OfficerMarch 12, 2008

---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLaser anemometer measurements in a transonic axial-flow fan rotorLaser anemometer surveys were made of the 3-D flow field in NASA rotor 67, a low aspect ratio transonic axial-flow fan rotor. The test rotor has a tip relative Mach number of 1.38. The flowfield was surveyed at design speed at near peak efficiency and near stall operating conditions. Data is presented in the form of relative Mach number and relative flow angle distributions on surfaces of revolution at nine spanwise locations evenly spaced from hub to tip. At each spanwise location, data was acquired upstream, within, and downstream of the rotor. Aerodynamic performance measurements and detailed rotor blade and annulus geometry are also presented so that the experimental results can be used as a test case for 3-D turbomachinery flow analysis codes.Document ID19900001929Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsStrazisar, Anthony J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Wood, Jerry R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Hathaway, Michael D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Suder, Kenneth L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1989Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2879E-4480NASA-TP-2879Accession Number90N11245Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-61Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900001929.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Spotlight on Juvenile Justice Initiatives: A State by State Survey      

# Report: Spotlight on Juvenile Justice Initiatives: A State by State Survey

This report (PDF, 53 pages), developed by the Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice, highlights the results of a state-level survey of juvenile justice initiatives from 34 states as reported by their State Advisory Groups. **Learn more** (PDF, 53 pages).