alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13615-13616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04805]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

United States Mint


Notification of Citizens Coinage Advisory Committee March 23-24, 
2021, Public Meeting

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to United States Code, Title 31, section 5135(b)(8)(C), 
the United States Mint announces the Citizens Coinage Advisory 
Committee (CCAC) teleconference public meeting scheduled for March 23-
24, 2021.
    Date: March 23, 2021 and March 24, 2021.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. (EST) (March 23, 2021) and 10:00 a.m. 
to 1:00 p.m. (March 24, 2021).
    Location: This meeting will occur via teleconference. Interested 
members of the public may dial in to listen to the meeting at (888) 
330-1716; Access Code: 1137147.
    Subject: Review and discussion of obverse and reverse candidate 
designs for the Merchant Mariners of World War II Congressional Gold 
Medal (Pub. L. 116-125); review and discussion of candidate designs for 
the 2022 American Innovation $1 Coin Program (Rhode Island, Vermont, 
Kentucky, and Tennessee).
    Interested persons should call the CCAC HOTLINE at (202) 354-7502 
for the latest update on meeting time and access information.
    The CCAC advises the Secretary of the Treasury on any theme or 
design proposals relating to circulating coinage, bullion coinage, 
Congressional Gold Medals, and national and other medals; advises the 
Secretary of the Treasury with regard to the events, persons, or places 
to be commemorated by the issuance of commemorative coins in each of 
the five calendar years succeeding the year in which a commemorative 
coin designation is made; and makes recommendations with respect to the 
mintage level for any commemorative coin recommended.
    For members of the public interested in listening in to the 
provided call

[[Page 13616]]

number, this is a reminder that the public attendance is for listening 
purposes only. Any member of the public interested in submitting 
matters for the CCAC's consideration is invited to submit them by email 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#375e595158775454565419505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2dbdcd4ddf2d1d1d3d19cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For Accommodation Request: If you need an accommodation to listen 
to the CCAC meeting, please contact the Diversity Management and Civil 
Rights Office by March 17, at 202-354-7260 or 1-888-646-8369 (TYY).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Warren, United States Mint 
Liaison to the CCAC; 801 9th Street NW; Washington, DC 20220; or call 
202-354-7208.

(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5135(b)(8)(C))

Eric Anderson,
Executive Secretary, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. 2021-04805 Filed 3-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 1160.600 General.

Referenda to determine whether eligible fluid milk processors favor the issuance, continuance, termination or suspension of a Fluid Milk Promotion Order authorized by the Fluid Milk Promotion Act of 1990 shall be conducted in accordance with this subpart.
#### Ruth Stoner v. Melvin Stoner

*Paul W. Orth,*in support of the motion.

*John Crosskey,*in opposition.

Submitted June 1

decided June 3, 1971

This court having considered the defendant’s “Motion To Review Order Terminating Stay Of Execution” in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County, it is hereby ordered that a finding be made in accordance with Practice Book § 694, as amended.
Exhibit
      32.2









**CERTIFICATION
      OF CFO PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Calibre Energy, Inc. (“Calibre”) on
      Form10-KSB for the quarter and year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 30, 2006 (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350 as adopted pursuant to §§ 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge based upon a review of the Report,
      that:




(3)  The
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and




(4)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Calibre as of the dates
      and
      for periods presented as required by such Report.









/s/
                O. Oliver Pennington, IIIO.
                Oliver Pennington, IIIChief
                Financial OfficerMarch
                30, 2006










This
      certification is provided pursuant to §§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      be deemed filed by Calibre or the certifying officer for purposes of §§ 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by §§ 906 has been provided to
      Calibre and will be retained by it and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
      request.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Youth Apprenticeship in the United States      

# Report: Youth Apprenticeship in the United States

This report (PDF, 47 pages) describes the state of youth apprenticeship in the United States, reviews existing state youth apprenticeship systems, and describes the organization and partnerships of the Youth Apprenticeship Readiness grantees. Findings indicate the importance of considering how well youth of different ages are represented in the apprenticeship system. **Learn more.**
#### § 1217.80 Right of the Secretary.

All fiscal matters, programs or projects, contracts, rules or regulations, reports, or other substantive actions proposed and prepared by the Board shall be submitted to the Secretary for approval.
Exhibit
13.1




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the transition report of CIBT Education Group Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the two months ended August 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Toby Chu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




1
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




By: /s/
Toby Chu


Toby Chu


Chief Executive Officer


September 26, 2008
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Bernard E. Pollak and Another, as Trustees under the Will of Edyth G. Hewes, Deceased. Richard Wolfgang, Appellant; Edyth N. Gross et al., Respondents.

Order entered January 16, 1967 denying motion of respondent-appellant for an order dismissing the answer of respondents Edyth Noel Gross and Iris Cornelia Love, and the objections therein contained, unanimously reversed, on the law, and it is ordered that the answer of respondents Gross and Love, and the objections contained therein be dismissed, and that letters of trusteeship be issued to appellant Richard Wolfgang to act as cotrustee with Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, with $50 costs and disbursements on the appeal payable from the estate to all parties filing briefs. The designation of the successor trustee in the decedent’s will as “Richard Wolfgang, husband of my grandchild” is descriptive only and not an expression of intent that appellant was to serve as a successor trustee only if he remained married to decedent’s grandchild and was her husband at the time circumstances permitted the designation of a trustee. *(Matter of Tuck,*165 Misc. 346, affd. 256 App. Div. 971, affd. 281 N. Y. 697; *Man*v. *Man,*197 App. Div. 547; *Matter of Miller,*171 App. Div. 229, affd. 219 N. Y. 572.) The objections of respondents Gross and Love are not within the purview of section 94 of the,, Surrogate’s Court Act. Thus, the Surrogate was powerless to refuse the issuance of letters to appellant. *(Matter of Foss,*282 App. Div. 509, 511.) In the latter case we noted “It has been uniformly held heretofore that the grounds for disqualification set forth in section 94 are exclusive, and that the Surrogate’s power to refuse letters is limited by that statute. *(Matter of Flood,*236 N. Y. 408; *Matter of Leland,*219 N. Y. 387; *Matter of Latham,*145 App. Div. 849)”. Neither section 40 nor section 99 of the Surrogate’s Court Act enlarges the grounds for refusal of letters specifically enumerated in section 94. Settle order on notice. Concur — Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McNally and MeGivern, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Anthony J. Falconieri, Respondent, v. City Civil Service Commission, Appellant.

Judgment granting petitioner’s application under article 78 of CPLR to compel respondent-appellant City Civil Service Commission to extend to him full credit as a disabled veteran with adjustments in his rank on the list of eligibles for promotion to Lieutenant in the Fire Department, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to Civil Service Commission, and the petition dismissed. Under section 6 of article V of the State Constitution, members of the civil service are entitled to additional credits based upon military service. These credits are increased if they were disabled “ in the actual performance of duty in any war ” and their disability is certified by the United States Veterans’ Administration. Any doubt as to the meaning of the constitutional provision is resolved by the implementing statute (Civil Service Law, § 21, now § 85). The statute provides that the certification by the Veterans’ Administration is controlling *(Matter of Potts*v. *Kaplan,*264 N. Y. 110, 117). Moreover, the certification relates not only to the member’s status as a disabled veteran but also to whether the disability was incurred by him in time of war and is in existence at the time of application for appointment or promotion (§ 21, subd. 1, par. [b]). Applying these rules in the petitioner’s ease, it is evident that he lacks the appropriate certification because, while he has a service-connected disability, the Veterans’ Administration has failed to certify that his disability was incurred in service during time of war *(Matter of Potts*v. *Kaplan,*264 N. Y. 110, 117, supra; cf. *Matter of Carey*v. *Morton,*297 N. Y. 361, 371). Moreover, if the petition did not have to be dismissed on the merits, there would be a serious question raised as to the timeliness of this proceeding (see, generally, *Matter of Foy*v. *Brennan,*285 App. Div. 669, 673). Regardless of whose fault it was for the delay, petitioner seeks adjustment of his status retroactively to 1953 and with respect to an eligible list from which he has in fact been appointed and has served since 1955. There are some events which if not corrected become irreversible merely through the passage of time. This would seem to be just such an event. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.
Exhibit 4.1





Alaia Capital, LLC


10 Corbin Drive


Darien, Connecticut 06820


 


June 2, 2017


 


Alaia Market Linked Trust, Series 1-2


Alaia Defined Outcome Solution


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


2 Hanson Place, 12th Floor


Brooklyn, New York 11217








	Re:	
Alaia Defined Outcome Solution (the “Trust”)







 


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


We have examined Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (File No. 333-215809) for the above captioned Trust.  We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references to Alaia Capital, LLC as evaluator.


 


You are hereby authorized to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 







 


	 	Very truly yours, 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	Alaia Capital, LLC 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	
By:

	 	
/s/ Oscar Loyanz

	 
	 	 	 	
Name: Oscar Loyanz

	 
	 	 	 	
Title:  Managing Director
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Geology and mineral deposits ofthe Snowmass Mountain area, Gunnison County, Colorado**
 
Report | Plates: 01
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:884
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000969639
 
October 22, 2018
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1412.32 Updating PLC yield for all covered commodities except seed cotton. ( a ) For any covered commodity on the farm that has base acres as adjusted, in excess of zero acres, an owner of the farm has a one-time opportunity in a specified period, as announced by FSA, to update PLC yields on a covered commodity-by-covered commodity basis equal to 90 percent of each covered commodity's 2013 through 2017 average yield per planted acre, excluding from the average any year when no acreage was planted to the covered commodity. If the yield per planted acre in any of the years 2013 through 2017 is less than 75 percent of the average of the county yield, then 75 percent of the average of the 2013 through 2017 county yield will be substituted for that year, excluding from the average any year when no acreage was planted to the covered commodity, multiplied by the ratio obtained by dividing: ( 1 ) The average of the 2008 through 2012 national average yield per planted acre for the covered commodity; by
( 2 ) The average of the 2013 through 2017 national average yield per planted acre for the covered commodity.
( b ) The owner of the farm may retain the counter-cyclical yield as the PLC yield or update the PLC yield, on a covered commodity-by-covered commodity basis.
( c ) PLC yields are exclusively used for PLC. However, any owner of a farm can update the PLC yields, regardless of program election or decision on enrollment or participation.
( d ) A decision by any owner of a farm to update any PLC yield as specified in this section is final and binding unless that decision to update the yield is withdrawn by that owner or a different yield update is made by that owner or another owner. If that owner or another owner requests a different PLC yield update for the covered commodity during the yield update period specified in paragraph (a) of this section that update will become final.
( e ) All PLC yield updates are subject to review and approval by FSA as specified in § 1412.36. FSA's decision to issue payments based on the PLC yield updated by an owner is subject to verification and spot check by FSA at any time.
( f ) Yield updates in this section will be permitted using the owner's certification of yield. The certification is subject to spot check or verification by FSA at any time. If selected for spot check or verification, the owner must submit evidence specified in § 1412.34 to support the certified yield.
[79 FR 57716, Sept. 26, 2014, as amended at 83 FR 40658, Aug. 16, 2018; 84 FR 45890, Sept. 3, 2019]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Data Snapshot on Hispanic Youth Delinquency Cases      

# Report: Data Snapshot on Hispanic Youth Delinquency Cases

This snapshot (PDF, 1 page) uses data from the National Juvenile Court Data Archive to highlight trends and processing characteristics of delinquency cases involving Hispanic youth. **Learn More** (PDF, 1 page).
#### § 1230.87 Personal liability.

No member or employee of the Board shall be held personally liable, either individually or jointly, in any way whatsoever to any person for errors in judgment, mistakes, or other acts of either commission or omission, as such member or employee, except for acts of dishonesty or willful misconduct.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1425.24 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Janet Hammill, Petitioner, v Barbara Blum, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State commissioner, dated August 7, 1978 and *582made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed the determination of the local agency which reduced the petitioner’s grant of public assistance from $182.10 semimonthly to $126.79 semimonthly. Petition granted, determination annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the respondents are directed to restore, retroactively, the full amount of petitioner’s grant of public assistance. The reduction in question resulted from decreasing a work-related deduction from the gross income of the petitioner, who was employed full time on a job that required her absence from home from 7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on weekdays. To enable her to do this she had to employ a "baby-sitter” at a cost of $50 per week to mind her three children during her absence from home. Petitioner received a grant of aid in the AFDC (Aid to Family with Dependent Children) category. In determining the amount of the grant she was permitted to deduct the full $50 per week child care expense from her gross income. By notice dated May 5, 1978 the local agency advised petitioner of its intent to reduce her semimonthly public assistance payment from $182.10 to $126.79 for the stated reason of "Recomputing employment expenses decreasing child care amount to maximum as per proceeding”. At petitioner’s request a statutory fair hearing was had at which the hearing officer tried in vain to obtain from the agency’s representative any statement of the schedule or guideline followed by the agency in determining the amount of reduction. The agency representative admitted that the determination was made on an individual, case-by-case basis, but offered no evidence to support the reduction proposed in the present case. Nevertheless, the State commissioner affirmed the determination of the local agency reducing petitioner’s grant of public assistance, and petitioner then brought the present CPLR article *78*proceeding. Since petitioner is already receiving public assistance, and since the agency is seeking to discontinue part of that aid by reducing the semimonthly payments to her, the agency must produce substantial evidence to justify its action, since it is depriving her of something she was already receiving (see *Matter of Woodley v Lavine,*54 AD2d 912). The agency offered no proof whatever to justify its proposed reduction, and the determination should therefore be annulled. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.