alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Striving Readers      

# Striving Readers

This program is aimed at improving the reading skills of middle school- and high school-aged students who are reading below grade level.

http://www.ed.gov/programs/strivingreaders/index.html
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: First-Generation and Continuing-Generation College Students: A Comparison of High School and Postsecondary Experiences      

# Report: First-Generation and Continuing-Generation College Students: A Comparison of High School and Postsecondary Experiences

This report examines background and educational characteristics, plans for college, postsecondary enrollment, and postsecondary completion patterns of first-generation college students and their peers whose parents have college degrees. It also explores how postsecondary plans, attendance, and completion varies between these two groups of students and presents the reasons why some 2002 high school sophomores, who were postsecondary enrollees, did not obtain a credential by 2012. 

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018009&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Report
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           National Mental Health Awareness Month      

# National Mental Health Awareness Month

This presidential proclamation declares May National Mental Health Awareness Month. In the proclamation, the president calls on citizens, government agencies, private businesses, nonprofit organizations, and other groups to take action to strengthen the mental health of communities across the Nation. **Learn more.**
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0044. LEBRON KEITH HOOPER v. THE STATE.

In 2017, a jury convicted Lebron Keith Hooper of two counts of aggravated

sodomy and one count each of aggravated child molestation and cruelty to children

in the first degree. This Court affirmed Hooper convictions in an unpublished

opinion. Hooper v. the State, Case No. A19A1926 (decided March 6, 2020). In June

2020, Hooper filed a pro se motion to vacate a void judgment. The trial court

dismissed the motion, and Hooper filed this appeal.

As the Supreme Court has made clear, a post-conviction motion seeking to

vacate or set aside an allegedly void criminal conviction is not one of the established

procedures for challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case, and an

appeal from the trial court’s ruling on such a petition should be dismissed. See

Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010). Here, Hooper asserted that

due to ineffective assistance of counsel and alleged jury instruction error, his

convictions should be vacated. This is not a valid procedure for challenging the

judgment in his criminal case. 

August 25, 2020
Accordingly, Hooper’s appeal from the denial of his motion is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/25/2020
#### § 1260.213 Removal.

If any person appointed under this part fails or refuses to perform his or her duties properly or engages in acts of dishonesty or willful misconduct, the Board or Committee may recommend to the Secretary that that person be removed from office. If the Secretary finds that the recommendation demonstrates adequate cause, the Secretary shall remove the person from office. A person appointed or certified under this part or any employee of the Board or Committee may be removed by the Secretary if the Secretary determines that the person's continued service would be detrimental to the purposes of the Act.
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

  Texas

> - Aldine-Harris County
- Austin
- Beaumont
- Brownsville
- Corpus Christi
- Corpus Christi #2
- Dallas
- Ferguson Road Initiative
- Ft. WorthGalveston
Houston
McAllen
Richmond
San Antonio
South Dallas
Texarkana
VernonWichita Falls
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal control over financial reporting.
 5
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs
auditors and the audit committee of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date:  August 14, 2007
    /s/ Tom LynchTom Lynch, President (Principal ExecutiveOfficer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Umanzor, Appellant.

[777 NYS2d 151]

*647Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered October 31, 2000, convicting him of arson in the first degree, murder in the second degree (eight counts), and assault in the first degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the People failed to establish by legally sufficient evidence that he possessed the culpable mental state to commit the crime of depraved indifference murder is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant confessed that in the middle of the night he poured gasoline on a staircase, which was the sole means of egress for the upper floor residents in an apartment building inhabited by many families, including his own. The defendant ignited the gasoline with a match and left. The fire claimed the lives of four residents in the building. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Florio, J.P., Townes, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
#### § 1214.22 Suspend.

*Suspend* means to issue a rule under section 553 of title 5 U.S.C. to temporarily prevent the operation of an order or part thereof during a particular period of time specified in the rule.
§ 15a.420 Access to schools operated by LEAs. A recipient that is a local educational agency shall not, on the basis of sex, exclude any person from admission to: ( a ) Any institution of vocational education operated by such recipient; or
( b ) Any other school or educational unit operated by such recipient, unless such recipient otherwise makes available to such person, pursuant to the same policies and criteria of admission, courses, services, and facilities comparable to each course, service, and facility offered in or through such schools.
#### § 1250.519 Late-payment charge.

Any unpaid assessments due to the Board pursuant to § 1250.347 shall be increased by a late-payment charge of 1.5 percent each month beginning with the day following the date such assessments are 30 days past due. Any remaining amount due, which shall include any unpaid charges previously made pursuant to this section, shall be increased at the same rate on the corresponding day of each month thereafter until paid. Assessments that are not paid when due because of a person's failure to submit a handler report to the Board as required shall accrue late-payment charges from the time such assessments should have been remitted. The timeliness of a payment to the Board shall be based on the applicable postmark date or the date payment is actually received by the Board, whichever is earlier.

[58 FR 34697, June 29, 1993]
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 18-10931

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Team Resources, Incorporated; Fossil Energy 

Corporation; Kevin A. Boyles, 

Defendants—Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CV-1045

ON REMAND FROM

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before King, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Our previous decision in this appeal, see SEC v. Team Resources, Inc., 

942 F.3d 272 (5th Cir. 2019), has been vacated and remanded by the Supreme 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 13, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-10931 Document: 00515526694 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/13/2020
No. 18-10931

2

Court “for further consideration in light of Liu v. SEC, 591 U.S. ---[, 140 S. 

Ct. 1936] (2020).” Team Resources, Inc. v. SEC, No. 19-978, 2020 WL 

3578673, at *1 (U.S. July 2, 2020). As relevant here, Liu held “that a 

disgorgement award that does not exceed a wrongdoer’s net profits and is 

awarded for victims is equitable relief permissible under [15 U.S.C.] 

§ 78u(d)(5).” 140 S. Ct. at 1940. Liu also discussed various “principles that 

may guide the lower courts’ assessment” of the amount of disgorgement that 

may be lawfully awarded in particular cases. Id. at 1947; see also id. at 1947–

50.

In this case, the district court did not have the benefit of Liu’s 

guidance when it determined the amount of disgorgement. Application of Liu 

to the facts of this case should be left in the first instance to the district court’s 

sound judgment.

We therefore VACATE the judgment of the district court and 

REMAND the case for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme 

Court’s decision in Liu.

 Case: 18-10931 Document: 00515526694 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/13/2020
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1469.34 Performance based on advice or action of representatives of NRCS.

If a participant relied upon the advice or action of any authorized representative of CCC, and did not know or have reason to know that the action or advice was improper or erroneous, the State Conservationist may accept the advice or action as meeting the requirements of CSP. In addition, the State Conservationist may grant relief, to the extent it is deemed desirable by CCC, to provide a fair and equitable treatment because of the good faith reliance on the part of the participant.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 1421
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart E of part 1421 appear at 74 FR 15656, Apr. 7, 2009.

§ 1421.416 Processing loan deficiency payments. ( a ) DMAs must take the following actions in the following order when an application for an LDP is filed: ( 1 ) In addition to other determinations that are required, the DMA must determine whether the producer exceeds the AGI limits to allow the receipt of the LDP. If the producer is over the AGI limit the DMA cannot process the request.
( 2 ) If EWRs are applicable for the peanuts for which the LDP is sought, the DMA must instruct the current holder to notify the EWR provider to amend the EWR to show that the peanuts were used to obtain an LDP;
( 3 ) The DMA must insure that the producer or the person holding the power of attorney for the producer signs the LDP documents; and
( 4 ) If the peanuts and the producer are eligible for the MAL and all other conditions have been met, the DMA may disburse funds to the producer subject to the time limits set out elsewhere in this part.
( b ) The LDP rate applicable to the LDP request will be the rate in effect on the date the DMA receives the request except as may otherwise be provided for in this part.
[70 FR 33799, June 10, 2005. Redesignated at 74 FR 15656, Apr. 7, 2009; 80 FR 129, Jan. 2, 2015; 86 FR 70706, Dec. 13, 2021]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Julio Almonte, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 554]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P FitzGerald, J.), rendered October 4, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]).

The credible evidence disproved defendant’s justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Contrary to defendant’s *325argument, the disinterested eyewitness saw the entire altercation and totally refuted defendant’s claim of self-defense. Furthermore, the jury could infer from defendant’s conduct that he intended to cause serious physical injury *(see People v*Steinberg, 79 NY2d 673, 685 [1992]).

The element of serious physical injury was established by evidence that defendant stabbed the victim in the chest, which caused him to be hospitalized for four days, during which time a large quantity of blood was drained from the his chest cavity, and which wound also caused permanent scars *(see*Penal Law § 10.00 [10]; *People v Rodriguez,*2 AD3d 284, 285 [2003]). Furthermore, the medical expert testified that, if left untreated, a wound such as the one the victim sustained would have created a substantial risk of death *(see e.g. People v Gordon,*257 AD2d 533 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 899 [1999]). The doctor’s testimony about the risk of death was not conjectural *(see People v Fullard,*233 AD2d 757, 759 [1996], *lv denied*89 NY2d 1092 [1997]; *People v Ross,*125 AD2d 422 [1986], *lv denied*69 NY2d 833 [1987]). Similarly, the court’s charge that serious physical injury includes physical injury which, if left untreated, creates a substantial risk of death was a correct statement of the law and was warranted by the evidence. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Sullivan and Marlow, JJ.