alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ABYSS
GROUP, LLC


 


December 31,
2010


 


Mr. William
O'Hara, Chief Operating
Officer and Director


Galaxy Gaming,
Inc.


6980 O'Bannon
Drive


Las Vegas,
NV 89117


 


RE:  ASSIGNMENT
OF LEASE


 


Dear Mr.
O'Hara:


 


Pursuant
to Section 10
of the Lease
Agreement between Galaxy
Gaming, Inc. and
Abyss Group, LLC dated August 31,
2010 for the premises located at 6980 O'Bannon
Drive, Las Vegas Nevada, (“Agreement”) please be advised that Abyss Group,
LLC has assigned its interest  in
the Agreement to the Therese  Saucier Living
Trust. Effective January  1, 2011, the
Landlord in the Agreement  shall be the Therese Saucier Living Trust and all future
rent payments  and any future  inquiries
should be direct to  the Therese Saucier
Living Trust. Thank you for your past business.


 


Sincerely,


 


ABYSS GROUP, LLC


 


/s/ Therese Saucier


By:  Therese
Saucier, Manager






    	1
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Brampton Crest
        International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three month period
        ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
        on
        the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brad Hacker, Chief Financial Officer of the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
        that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   By:
              /s/
                  Brad HackerBrad
                  HackerChief
                  Financial OfficerAugust
                  13, 2007
June 10, 2015 

Mr. Sabir Abdul-Haqq 

EagleEye Imaging Solutions 

P.O. Box 31022 

Jackson, MS 39286 

Dear Mr. Abdul-Haqq: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 19, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1722), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
ALLONGE TO PROMISSORY NOTE

For  valuable  consideration,  the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, this
Allonge  to  Promissory  Note  is made and executed effective as of November 22,
2004,  with reference to that certain Convertible Secured Promissory Note, dated
October  8, 2004 (the "Note"), in the original principal amount of Three Hundred
Fifty  Thousand  Dollars  (US$350,000.00),  made  by RAPIDTRON, INC., a Delaware
corporation  ("Maker"),  payable  to  the  order  of  LDM  ENTERPRISES,  LLC,  a
California  limited  liability  company  ("Holder").  This Allonge to Promissory
Note  shall  be  affixed  to the original of the Note and is hereby incorporated
into  and  made  a  part  of  the  Note,  for  all  purposes.

The  principal  amount  of  the  Note  is  increased  from $350,000 to $375,000.

The  term  of  the Note is hereby extended from November 8, 2004, until December
15,  2004.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  maker  and  the  Holder  have  executed this Allonge
effective  as  of  the  date  set  forth  above.

"MAKER"

RAPIDTRON,  INC,

a  Delaware  corporation


By:_________________________________________________
   John Creel, Chief Executive Officer and President

"HOLDER"

LDM  ENTERPRISES,  LLC,
a  California  limited  liability  company


By:_______________________
   Raymond A. Lee, Manager

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT  AND  CONSENT  OF  GUARANTOR

The  undersigned Guarantors of the foregoing Note hereby acknowledge and consent
to  this  Allonge to Promissory Note and agree that the "Obligations" as defined
in  the  Guaranty,  dated  October  8,  2004, shall include for all purposes the
increased  principal  amount  added  to  the  Note  pursuant  to this Allonge to
Promissory  Note.  Guarantors  acknowledge  that  Holder  is  relying  upon this
acknowledgment and consent in order to advance additional principal to Maker and
to enter into this Allonge, and hereby consents to the recording of the original
Deed  of  Trust  previously executed and delivered as security for the Guaranty.


_________________________________________
JOHN  A.  CREEL,  an  individual


_________________________________________
JUDITH  CREEL,  an  individual
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1580 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To affirm the policy of the United States regarding Internet 

governance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SMARTINEZ on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1580 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

2 The Congress finds the following: 

3 (1) Given the importance of the Internet to the 

4 global economy, it is essential that the Internet re5 main stable, secure, and free from government con6 trol. 

7 (2) The world deserves the access to knowledge, 

8 services, commerce, and communication, the accom9 panying benefits to economic development, edu10 cation, and health care, and the informed discussion 

11 that is the bedrock of democratic self-government 

12 that the Internet provides. 

13 (3) The structure of Internet governance has 

14 profound implications for competition and trade, de15 mocratization, free expression, and access to infor16 mation. 

17 (4) Countries have obligations to protect human 

18 rights, whether exercised online or offline. 

19 (5) The ability to innovate, develop technical 

20 capacity, grasp economic opportunities, and promote 

21 freedom of expression online is best realized in co22 operation with all stakeholders. 

23 (6) Proposals have been, and will likely con24 tinue to be, put forward at international regulatory 

25 bodies that would fundamentally alter the govern26 ance and operation of the Internet. 


SMARTINEZ on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 1580 RFS 

1 (7) The proposals would attempt to justify in2 creased government control over the Internet and 

3 could undermine the current multistakeholder model 

4 that has enabled the Internet to flourish and under 

5 which the private sector, civil society, academia, and 

6 individual users play an important role in charting 

7 its direction. 

8 (8) The proposals would diminish the freedom 

9 of expression on the Internet in favor of government 

10 control over content. 

11 (9) The position of the United States Govern12 ment has been and is to advocate for the flow of in13 formation free from government control. 

14 (10) This Administration and past Administra15 tions have made a strong commitment to the multi16 stakeholder model of Internet governance and the 

17 promotion of the global benefits of the Internet. 


SMARTINEZ on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 1580 RFS 

1 SEC. 2. POLICY REGARDING INTERNET GOVERNANCE. 

2 It is the policy of the United States to preserve and 

3 advance the successful multistakeholder model that gov4 erns the Internet. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 14, 2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SMARTINEZ on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 1221.133 Effect of termination or amendment. Unless otherwise expressly provided by the Secretary, the termination or amendment of this part or any subpart thereof, shall not: ( a ) Affect or waive any right, duty, obligation or liability which shall have arisen or which may thereafter arise in connection with any provision of this part; or
( b ) Release or extinguish any violation of this part; or
( c ) Affect or impair any rights or remedies of the United States, or of the Secretary, or of any other persons with respect to any such violation.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Promoting Family and Child Well-Being      

# Resource: Promoting Family and Child Well-Being

This webpage presents information on protective factors and child, youth, parent, and caregiver well-being. It offers resources about marriage, fatherhood, parenting, and building the capacity of programs and systems to promote well-being. **Learn more.**
#### In the Matter of Richard C. McKenna, Appellant, v County of Nassau Office of the County Attorney, Respondent.

In a proceeding to modify an arbitrator’s award, in which respondent cross-applied to vacate the award, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 7,1979, which denied petitioner’s application and granted respondent’s cross application. Judgment reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, petitioner’s application to modify the arbitrator’s award is granted and respondent’s cross application to vacate the award is denied. Petitioner, a Nassau County police officer, received *816payment of his full salary pursuant to section 207-c of the General Municipal Law while he was unable to work and was recovering from injuries sustained during a job-related traffic accident. He also filed for first-party benefits under New York’s no-fault law (Insurance Law, § 670 *et seq.).*At the time of the accident the no-fault law required that any recovery for basic economic loss be reduced by amounts recovered or recoverable pursuant to State or Federal Social Security disability benefits or workers’ compensation benefits (Insurance Law, § 671, subd 2, par [b]). There was no express requirement that payments under wage continuation programs, such as provided for in section 207-c of the General Municipal Law, be deducted. The arbitrator’s award did not include a deduction of the payments petitioner received under section 207-c. Special Term vacated the award to avoid the double *recovery. We*find that the award was not so irrational as to warrant vacatur and, accordingly, the judgment of Special Term must be reversed (see *Matter of Garcia v Federal Ins. Co.,*46 NY2d 1040; *Matter of Furstenberg [Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.],*49 NY2d 757; cf. *Matter of Levine [Zurich Amer. Ins. Co.]*49 NY2d 907). Apparently, a loophole existed in the original no-fault law which permitted the type of double recovery that petitioner sought. This loophole has since been eliminated by the Legislature (see Insurance Law, § 671, subd 1, as amd by L 1977, ch 892, *§*6; see, also, Memorandum of State Executive Department, McKinney’s Session Laws of NY, 1977, p 2448; *Wellington v City of New York,*101 Misc 2d 970). It is also not disputed that in issuing his award, the arbitrator miscalculated the amount (see CPLR 7511, subd [c], par 1). Consequently petitioner’s award should be modified so as to provide as follows:

Basic Economic loss $4,988.97

Less 20% (see Insurance Law, § 671, subd 2, par [a]) (997.72)

Less Worker’s Compensation payments (1,950,00)

Total recomputed award $2,041.25.

Damiani, J. P., Titone, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: National Runaway Safeline (NRS) | (1800runaway.org)      

# Resource: National Runaway Safeline (NRS) | (1800runaway.org)

This Safeline for runaway youth and youth experiencing homelessness has staff available 24/7 to listen and offer confidential, non-directive, and non-judgmental support. The site provides free services, trained staff, and call, text, email, chat, or forum support as well resources for youth, concerned adults, and service providers. **Learn more.**
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1470.21 Contract requirements. ( a ) After NRCS approves the application and develops the conservation stewardship plan in accordance with § 1470.22, NRCS will enter into a conservation stewardship contract with the participant to enroll the participant's agricultural operation in the program.
( b ) The conservation stewardship contract will— ( 1 ) Be for a period of 5 years;
( 2 ) Incorporate by reference the conservation stewardship plan;
( 3 ) State the payment amount NRCS agrees to make to the participant annually, subject to the availability of funds;
( 4 ) Incorporate all provisions as required by law or statute, including requirements that the participant will— ( i ) Implement the conservation stewardship plan as described in § 1470.22;
( ii ) Operate and maintain conservation activities on the agricultural operation consistent with § 1470.23;
( iii ) Comply with the terms of the contract or documents incorporated by reference into the contract;
( iv ) Refund as determined by NRCS, any program payments received with interest, and forfeit any future payments under the program, upon the violation of a term or condition of the contract, consistent with § 1470.27;
( v ) Refund as determined by NRCS, all program payments received with interest, upon the transfer of the right and interest of the participant, in land subject to the contract, unless the transferee of the right and interest agrees to assume all obligations of the contract, consistent with § 1470.25;
( vi ) Maintain and supply information as requested by NRCS, to determine compliance with the conservation stewardship plan and any other requirements of the program; and
( vii ) Not conduct any activities on the agricultural operation that would tend to defeat the purposes of the program, as determined by NRCS;
( 5 ) Permit all economic uses of the eligible land that— ( i ) Maintain the agricultural or forestry nature of the land; and
( ii ) Are consistent with the conservation purposes of the contract;
( 6 ) Include a provision to ensure that NRCS will not consider a participant in violation of the contract for failure to comply with the contract due to circumstances beyond the control of the participant, including a disaster or related condition, as determined by NRCS; and
( 7 ) Include such other provisions as NRCS determines necessary to ensure the purposes of the program are achieved.
Exhibit 10.34


 





PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 


OF LIBERTY WORKING INTEREST 


 


 


Richfield Oil &
Gas Company, a Nevada corporation as (“Richfield” or “Buyer”), MacKov Investments Limited (“Seller”)
(collectively Richfield and Seller shall be referred to as “Parties”) are entering into this Agreement (the “Agreement”).
The Parties agree to the following terms:


 


WHEREAS Seller desires
to sell a 1.00% Carried Working Interest (“CWI”) and 2.25% Working Interest (“WI”) BPO and 1.75% WI APO
in the Liberty #1 Well and 3.25% WI BPO and 2.75% WI APO in the Liberty Prospect located in Juab County, Utah;


 


WHEREAS Richfield desires
to purchase the CWI and WI from Seller in Liberty #1 Well and Prospect as described above;


 


NOW THEREFORE in consideration
of the mutual covenants, conditions, and considerations provided below, Richfield and Seller agree as follows:


 


1.             The
Properties. Seller hereby assigns and conveys to Richfield all of Seller’s ownership in Liberty consisting of a 1.00%
CWI, 2.25% WI BPO and 1.75% WI APO in the Liberty #1 Well and 3.25% WI BPO and 2.75% WI APO in the Liberty Prospect located in
T12S, R1E, Section 34, SLB&M, Juab County, Utah.


 


2.              Purchase
Price. Richfield shall pay to Seller for the purchase of all of Seller’s CWI and WI in Liberty #1 Well and Prospect
the sum of $242,000. The sum payable shall be paid by the issuance of 96,800 shares of Richfield common stock, valued at $2.50
per share.


 


3.              Effective Date. The
conveyance by Seller shall be effective as of 7:00 a.m. local time, where the Properties are located, on October 1, 2012 (the
“Effective Date”). There is currently no production from the Properties.


 


4.              Taxes. Seller shall be responsible for all taxes relating to his WI in the Properties prior to the Effective Date.


 


5.         
    Further Assurances, Intent. Seller agrees to execute and deliver to Buyer all instruments, conveyances, and
other documents and to do such other acts not inconsistent with this Agreement as may be necessary or advisable to carry out
Seller’s intent.


 


6.        
    Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon Seller and Richfield
and their respective successors and assigns. However, no assignment by any party shall relieve any party of any duties or obligations
under this Agreement unless such relief is granted in writing by the other party.


 


7.        
     Complete Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete agreement between the parties regarding the purchase
and sale of the Properties. Where applicable, all of the terms of this Agreement shall survive the closing of this Agreement.


 


Richfield Oil & Gas Company


 





	/s/ Michael A. Cederstrom	 	Dated: 	November 30, 2012
	Michael A. Cederstrom, General Counsel	 	 	 



  


MacKov Investments Limited 


 





	/s/ Glenn G. MacNeil	 	Dated: 	November 30, 2012
	Glenn MacNeil, President	 	 	 


 






    	Page 1 of 1
#### § 1215.10 Part and subpart.

*Part* means the Popcorn Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Order and all rules and regulations and supplemental orders issued thereunder, and the term *subpart* means the Popcorn Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Order.