alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 180 Water Street Associates, L.P, Appellant, v Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 278]

*317Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.), entered April 21, 2003, dismissing the complaint pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered April 7, 2003, which, in an action for breach of contract and fraud brought by the owner of a commercial building against a prospective tenant, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously modified, on the law, to reinstate plaintiffs cause of action for breach of an agreement to negotiate a lease, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeals from orders, same court and Justice, entered April 7 and November 26, 2003, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The cause of action for breach of contract based on the subject letter signed by the parties was properly dismissed since the letter expressly disclaims any binding effect, and, in providing for a lease term of “approximately twenty years,” is too vague to be enforced as a lease *(see Martin Delicatessen v Schumacher, 52*NY2d 105, 109-110 [1981]; *Four Seasons Hotels v Vinnik,*127 AD2d 310, 317-318 [1987]; *Carmon v Soleh Boneh Ltd.,*206 AD2d 450, 450 [1994]). However, because the letter required the parties to negotiate in good faith and only with each other toward a final lease, and to do so on an exclusive basis, plaintiffs allegation that defendant was negotiating with other landlords from the beginning suffices to state a cause of action for breach of an agreement to negotiate *(see SNC, Ltd. v Kamine Eng’g & Mech. Contr. Co.,*238 AD2d 146 [1997], citing, inter alia, *Goodstein Constr. Corp. v City of New York,*67 NY2d 990 [1986], *affg*111 AD2d 49, 52 [1985]; *see also Goodstein Constr. Corp. v City of New York,*80 NY2d 366, 373 [1992]). The letter is sufficiently definite as to all material terms of a commercial lease except duration. However, the 20-year benchmark, while too vague to create a lease, does provide an adequate basis for determining whether the negotiations to which the parties had agreed were being conducted in good faith. As provided in the letter,- negotiations were to continue as “long as the parties are negotiating in good faith to consummate the transaction.” We note that plaintiffs measure of damages is out-of-pocket loss *(Goodstein,*80 NY2d at 373). The fraud cause of action was properly dismissed in the absence of any allegations showing a misrepresentation collateral to defendant’s obligation to negotiate in good faith *(see Krantz v Chateau Stores,*256 AD2d 186 [1998]). It does not avail plaintiff to allege that defendant never intended to negotiate with plaintiff exclusively *(see New York Univ. v Continental Ins. Co.,*87 NY2d 308, 318 [1995]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Sullivan and Marlow, JJ.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1410.62 Miscellaneous. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, in the case of death, incompetency, or disappearance of any participant, any payments due under this part will be paid to the participant's successor(s), as specified in part 707 of this title.
( b ) Unless otherwise specified in this part, payments under this part will be subject to the requirements of part 12 of this title concerning highly erodible land and wetland conservation and payments.
( c ) Any remedies permitted CCC under this part will be in addition to any other remedy, including, but not limited to, criminal remedies, or actions for damages in favor of CCC, or the United States, as may be permitted by law.
( d ) When an owner loses control of CRP acreage due to foreclosure and the new owner chooses not to continue the contract in accordance with § 1410.51, refunds may not be required from any participant on the contract to the extent CCC determines that waiver of such refund is appropriate.
( e ) Cropland enrolled in CRP will be classified as cropland for the time period it is enrolled in CRP. After the CRP contract ends, such land will be removed from the classification of cropland if the county committee determines the land no longer meet the definition of cropland in part 718 of this title.
( f ) As determined by CCC, incentives may be authorized to foster opportunities for Indian Tribes and beginning, limited resource, socially disadvantaged, and veteran farmers and ranchers, and to enhance long-term environmental goals.
#### § 1216.54 Operating reserve.

The Board shall establish an operating monetary reserve and may carry over to subsequent fiscal years excess funds in a reserve so established; *Provided,* that funds in the reserve shall not exceed any fiscal year's anticipated expenses.
Gabriela



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

December 3, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00803

- CV

Juan Francisco MONTALV O , M.D., F.A.C.O.G., et al, Appellant

v.

Gabriela LOPEZ

, Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, W ebb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- CVT

- 000841

- D3 Honorable Beckie Palomo , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellants have filed a Petition for Permission to Appeal Amended Order Denying Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and Granting Defendants’ Motion for Permission to Appeal Interlocutory Order. If appellee wishes to file a response to the petition, s he must do

so no later than December 15 , 2014 . If appellee does not respond by December 15, 2014, this court will rule on appellants’ petition without benefit of a response from appellee.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

I N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of C ourt
Office of Citizenship 

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 

June 7, 2005 

Fact Sheet 

The Office of Citizenship Launches a New Publication:

Welcome to the United States: A Guide for New Immigrants

The Office of Citizenship, within U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, is announcing the release of 

Welcome to the United States: A Guide for New Immigrants. This landmark publication represents the first 

time in recent history that the federal government has provided orientation materials for new permanent 

residents. Designed for permanent residents and the organizations that serve them, Welcome to the United 

States contains practical information to help immigrants settle into everyday day life in the United States, as 

well as basic civics information that will introduce new immigrants to the U.S. system of government. The 

guide also provides new immigrants with ideas on how to become involved in their new communities, and 

how to meet their responsibilities and exercise their rights as permanent residents. 

This guide includes information about: 

 The rights and responsibilities of 

permanent residents 

 Places to learn English 

 How to find a place to live 

 How to get a Social Security number 

 Job placement resources 

 How the U.S. school system works and 

how to enroll your child in school 

 Ways to keep your home and family safe 

 How the Federal Government works

The guide is available for free, and can be found online in English, Spanish, Chinese and Vietnamese at 

http://uscis.gov/graphics/citizenship/. Copies will soon be available online in Tagalog, Korean, Russian, 

Arabic, French, Portuguese, and Haitian Creole. Print copies of the English and Spanish guides are available 

for purchase through the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) by calling 1-866-512-1800 or by ordering 

through their website at http://bookstore.gpo.gov. Individual copies of the English and Spanish guides cost 

$9.50. The guide in English is offered at a bulk purchase discount of $171 for a box of 100. The guide in 

Spanish is offered in bulk at $112 for a box of 50. 

About the Office of Citizenship 

The Office of Citizenship was created by the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and is mandated with promoting 

instruction and training on citizenship rights and responsibilities. The Office of Citizenship focuses on 

providing information and resources to immigrants at two key points in their journey towards civic 

integration: when they first become legal immigrants and when they are ready to begin the formal 

naturalization process. To find out more about the Office of Citizenship, please visit our website at

http://uscis.gov/graphics/citizenship/ or call (202)272-1310.

-USCISwww.uscis.gov
#### § 1210.367 Patents, copyrights, inventions, and publications.

Any patents, copyrights, inventions, product formulations, or publications developed through the use of funds collected under the provisions of this Plan shall be the property of the United States government as represented by the Board. Funds generated by such patents, copyrights, inventions, product formulations, or publications shall be considered income subject to the same fiscal, budget, and audit controls as other funds of the Board. Upon termination of this part, § 1210.364 shall apply to determine the disposition of all such property.
#### Neanie W. Armbrecht, appellant, v. Clayton C. Pickett and Edward Olsen, appellees.

Gen. No. 33,295.

*622Opinion filed May 31, 1929.

Albert S. Louer, for appellant; Arthur Abraham, of counsel. Lowenthal & Munns, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Seanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 1212.82 Suspension or termination.

The Secretary shall suspend or terminate the operation of this part or subpart or any provision thereof, if the Secretary finds that this part or subpart or the provision obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
GEORGIA INTERNATIONAL
MINING CORP.
 Exhibit
31.1


CERTIFICATION




I, Edmond
Forister, certify that:




1.      I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Georgia International Mining
Corp.;




2.      Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;




3.      Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.      The
small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:




(a)        Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)        Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)        Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and




5.      The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):




(a)        All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information;
and




(b)        Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.






Dated:
              May
      19, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Edmond ForisterEdmond
      Forister, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief
      Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and PrincipalFinancial
      Officer)
Nicor Inc.
                                                      Form S-8
                                                      Exhibit 23.01


                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated January
22, 2001, included in Nicor Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000, and our reports dated June 27, 2001, on the Nicor Companies Savings
Investment Plan and the Nicor Gas Thrift Plan financial statements included in
the Nicor Inc. Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31,
2000, and to all references to our firm included in this registration statement.




ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Chicago, Illinois
November 30, 2001
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1435.5 Other regulations. The following are applicable to this part: ( a ) Part 707—Payments due persons who have died, disappeared, or have been declared incompetent.
( b ) Part 718—Provisions applicable to multiple programs.
( c ) Part 780—Appeal regulations.
( d ) Part 1403—Debt settlement policies and procedures.
( e ) Part 1405—Loans, purchases, and other operations.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 112 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 

Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways 

and Means, Education and the Workforce, Natural Resources, the Judiciary, House Administration, Rules, and Appropriations, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act 

of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible Path to 

5 Full Obamacare Repeal Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 112 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AF2 FORDABLE CARE ACT AND THE HEALTH 

3 CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT 

4 OF 2010. 

5 (a) PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE

6 ACT.—Effective October 1, 2023, the Patient Protection 

7 and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111–148) is re8 pealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by 

9 such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not 

10 been enacted. 

11 (b) HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILI12 ATION ACT OF 2010.—Effective October 1, 2023, the 

13 Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 

14 (Public Law 111–152) is repealed, and the provisions of 

15 law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or re16 vived as if such Act had not been enacted. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry Stevenson,
Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.







|Registrant
        Date:
        August 17, 2012 |  | REVOLUTIONARY
        CONCEPTS, INC.
        By:/s/ Garry Stevenson
|------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                 |  | Garry Stevenson                                                    
|                                                 |  | Principal
    Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2024-0684

_____________________________

CHARLA D. HAGAN,

Petitioner,

v.

EMILIAN BUCATARU, Bucataru 

Law Firm, PLLC, a Florida 

professional limited liability 

company, and MARK J. PFLANZ,

Respondents.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

May 15, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. English v. McCrary, 348 So. 2d 293, 297–98 (Fla. 

1977.).

LEWIS, ROWE, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

David P. Healy of Dudley, Healy & Heath, PLLC, Tallahassee, for

Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondents.
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, Steven J. Golub, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of Lazard Group Finance LLC (the
Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;



(b) [Reserved]



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 10, 2005



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/  Steven J. Golub                                   
|Steven J. Golub President (Principal Executive Officer)
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-22-2005

In re: Kerwin

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 04-4408

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In re: Kerwin " (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 1324.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/1324
1

HPS-36 (January 2005) NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No. 04-4408 

____________

IN RE: RYAN KERWIN,

 Petitioner

____________

ON A PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

(Related to E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 03-cv-05645)

____________

Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. Pro.

January 21, 2005

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

 Filed: April 22, 2005 

_______________________

 OPINION

_______________________

PER CURIAM.

Ryan Kerwin, a Pennsylvania inmate serving a five to ten-year sentence in

prison imposed in January 1999 for various offenses, has filed a petition for writ of

mandamus. Kerwin seeks to compel the District Court to render a final decision on his

petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
On April 11, 2005, subsequent to the filing of Kerwin’s mandamus petition,

the District Court entered an order denying his § 2254 petition. Because the District

Court has afforded Kerwin the relief sought, we will deny the mandamus petition as

moot.