13312 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Notices 

3See Domestic Industry’s Letter, ‘‘Potassium 

Phosphate Salts from the People’s Republic of 

China: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated 

November 18, 2020. 

4See Domestic Industry’s Letter, ‘‘Potassium 

Phosphate Salts from the People’s Republic of 

China: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation 

of Five-Year (Sunset) Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order,’’ dated 

December 3, 2020. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews for 

November 2020,’’ dated December 23, 2020. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts from 

the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

7See Issues and Decision Memorandum 

review from ICL Performance Products 

LP and Prayon, Inc. (collectively, 

Domestic Industry), within the deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3

The members of the Domestic Industry 

claimed interested party status under 

section 771(9)(C) of the Act as producers 

of the domestic like product in the 

United States. On December 3, 2020, 

Commerce received a substantive 

response from the Domestic Industry 

within the 30-day deadline specified in 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 Commerce 

received no substantive responses from 

respondent interested parties, nor was a 

hearing requested. On December 23, 

2020, Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission that it 

did not receive an adequate substantive 

response from respondent interested 

parties.5 As a result, pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

include anhydrous Dipotassium 

Phosphate (DKP) and Tetrapotassium 

Pyrophosphate (TKPP), whether 

anhydrous or in solution (collectively 

‘‘phosphate salts’’). 

TKPP, also known as normal 

potassium pyrophosphate, 

Diphosphoric acid or Tetrapotassium 

salt, is a potassium salt with the formula 

K4P2O7. The CAS registry number for 

TKPP is 7320–34–5. TKPP is typically 

18.7 percent phosphorus and 47.3 

percent potassium. It is generally greater 

than or equal to 43.0 percent P2O5

content. TKPP is classified under 

subheading 2835.39.1000 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS). 

DKP, also known as Dipotassium salt, 

Dipotassium hydrogen orthophosphate 

or Potassium phosphate, dibasic, has a 

chemical formula of K2HPO4. The CAS 

registry number for DKP is 7758–11–4. 

DKP is typically 17.8 percent 

phosphorus, 44.8 percent potassium and 

40 percent P2O5 content. DKP is 

classified under subheading 

2835.24.0000 HTSUS. 

The products covered by the Order 

include the foregoing phosphate salts in 

all grades, whether food grade or 

technical grade. The products covered 

by the Order also include anhydrous 

DKP without regard to the physical 

form, whether crushed, granule, powder 

or fines. Also covered are all forms of 

TKPP, whether crushed, granule, 

powder, fines or solution. 

For purposes of the Order, the 

narrative description is dispositive, and 

not the tariff heading, American 

Chemical Society, CAS registry number 

or CAS name, or the specific percentage 

chemical composition identified above. 

Analysis of Commerce Received 

All issues raised in this review, 

including the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of dumping in the event 

of revocation and the magnitude of the 

margins likely to prevail if the Order 

were revoked, are addressed in the 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.6 A list of topics 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. 

The signed and the electronic version of 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on salts from 

China would likely lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping and that the 

magnitude of the margins is up to 95.40 

percent.7

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to interested parties subject to 

an APO of their responsibility 

concerning the return or destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305. Timely notification of the 

return or destruction of APO materials 

or conversion to judicial protective 

order is hereby requested. Failure to 

comply with the regulations and terms 

of an APO is a violation which is subject 

to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. 

Dated: March 2, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to 

Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–04766 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–891–001] 

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From 

Croatia: Final Affirmative 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that imports of 

common alloy aluminum sheet 

(aluminum sheet) from Croatia are 

being, or are likely to be, sold in the 

United States at less than fair value 

(LTFV) for the period of investigation 

January 1, 2019, through December 31, 

2019. 

DATES: Applicable March 8, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–6905. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Notices 13313 

1See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 

Croatia: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of 

Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, 

and Extension of Provisional Measures, 85 FR 

65384 (October 15, 2020) (Preliminary 

Determination), and accompanying Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Affirmative 

Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value 

Investigation of Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet 

from Croatia,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum 

Sheet from Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, 

Germany, Greece, India, Indonesia, Italy, Republic 

of Korea, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South 

Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and Turkey: Scope 

Comments Decision Memorandum for the 

Preliminary Determinations,’’ dated October 6, 2020 

(Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum). 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Common Alloy Aluminum 

Sheet from Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, 

Germany, Greece, India, Indonesia, Italy, Korea, 

Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, 

Spain, Taiwan, and Turkey: Scope Comments Final 

Decision Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with, 

and hereby adopted by, this notice (Final Scope 

Decision Memorandum). 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘In Lieu of Verification 

Supplemental,’’ dated December 9, 2020; see also 

Impol’s Letter, ‘‘Response to In Lieu of Verification 

Questionnaire,’’ dated December 17, 2020. 

6The final rate calculated for Impol in this 

investigation applies to subject merchandise 

produced by Impol-TLM d.o.o. and exported by 

either Impol-TLM d.o.o. (Croatia) or Impol d.o.o. 

(Slovenia). 

Background 

On October 15, 2020, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register its 

preliminary affirmative determination 

in the LTFV investigation of aluminum 

sheet from Croatia, in which we also 

postponed the final determination until 

March 1, 2021.1 We invited interested 

parties to comment on the Preliminary 

Determination. A summary of the events 

that occurred since Commerce 

published the Preliminary 

Determination, may be found in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.2

Scope of the Investigation 

The products covered by this 

investigation are aluminum sheet from 

Croatia. For a complete description of 

the scope of this investigation, see 

Appendix I. 

Scope Comments 

During the course of this 

investigation, Commerce received scope 

comments from interested parties. 

Commerce issued a Preliminary Scope 

Decision Memorandum to address these 

comments.3 We received comments 

from interested parties on the 

Preliminary Scope Decision 

Memorandum, which we address in the 

Final Scope Decision Memorandum.4

Commerce is not modifying the scope 

language as it appeared in the 

Preliminary Determination. See 

Appendix I for the final scope of the 

investigation. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs that were submitted by 

parties in this investigation are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the issues 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is attached to this notice 

at Appendix II. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn. The signed and electronic versions 

of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Verification 

Commerce was unable to conduct onsite verification of the information 

relied upon in making its final 

determination in this investigation. 

However, we took additional steps in 

lieu of an on-site verification to verify 

the information relied upon in making 

this final determination, in accordance 

with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act).5

Changes Since the Preliminary 

Determination 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received and our findings 

related to our request for information in 

lieu of on-site verification, we made one 

change to the margin calculation for 

Impol d.o.o. and Impol-TLM d.o.o., 

(collectively, Impol), the only 

mandatory respondent in this 

investigation. For a discussion of this 

change, see the ‘‘Changes from the 

Preliminary Determination’’ section of 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

All-Others Rate 

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act 

provides that the estimated weightedaverage dumping margin for all other 

producers and exporters not 

individually investigated shall be equal 

to the weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis, or 

determined entirely under section 776 

of the Act. Commerce calculated an 

individual estimated weighted-average 

dumping margin for Impol, the only 

individually examined exporter/ 

producer in this investigation. Because 

the only individually calculated 

dumping margin is not zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

otherwise available, the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margin 

calculated for Impol is the margin 

assigned to all other producers and 

exporters, pursuant to section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 

Final Determination 

The final estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins are as follows: 

Exporter/producer 

Estimated 

weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Impol d.o.o./Impol-TLM d.o.o.6 ... 3.19 

All Others .................................... 3.19 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed in this final determination 

within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Continuation of Suspension of 

Liquidation 

In accordance with section 

735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, Commerce will 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend 

liquidation of all appropriate entries of 

aluminum sheet from Croatia, as 

described in Appendix I of this notice, 

which are entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

October 15, 2020, the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the affirmative Preliminary 

Determination. Pursuant to section 

735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.210(d), we will instruct CBP to 

require a cash deposit for such entries 

of merchandise equal to the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margin as 

follows: (1) The cash deposit rate for the 

respondent listed above will be equal to 

the respondent-specific estimated 

weighted-average dumping margin 

determined in this final determination; 

(2) if the exporter is not a respondent 

identified above but the producer is, 

then the cash deposit rate will be equal 

to the respondent-specific estimated 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established for that producer of the 

subject merchandise; and (3) the cash 

deposit rate for all other producers and 

exporters will be equal to the all-others 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
13314 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Notices 

1See Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts from the 

People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty 

Order, 75 FR 42682 (July 22, 2010) (Order). 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margin. These suspension-of-liquidation 

instructions will remain in effect until 

further notice. 

International Trade Commission 

Notification 

In accordance with section 735(d) of 

the Act, we will notify the International 

Trade Commission (ITC) of the final 

affirmative determination of sales at 

LTFV. Because Commerce’s final 

determination is affirmative, in 

accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the 

Act, the ITC will make its final 

determination as to whether the 

domestic industry in the United States 

is materially injured, or threatened with 

material injury, by reason of imports or 

sales (or the likelihood of sales) for 

importation of aluminum sheet no later 

than 45 days after this final 

determination. If the ITC determines 

that such injury does not exist, this 

proceeding will be terminated, and all 

cash deposits posted will be refunded 

and suspension of liquidation will be 

lifted. If the ITC determines that such 

injury does exist, Commerce will issue 

an antidumping duty (AD) order 

directing CBP to assess, upon further 

instruction by Commerce, AD duties on 

all imports of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the effective 

date of the suspension of liquidation, as 

discussed above in the ‘‘Continuation of 

Suspension of Liquidation’’ section. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice will serve as a final 

reminder to the parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This determination and this notice are 

issued and published pursuant to 

sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.210(c). 

Dated: March 1, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

Scope of the Investigation 

The products covered by this investigation 

are common alloy aluminum sheet, which is 

a flat-rolled aluminum product having a 

thickness of 6.3 mm or less, but greater than 

0.2 mm, in coils or cut-to-length, regardless 

of width. Common alloy sheet within the 

scope of this investigation includes both not 

clad aluminum sheet, as well as multi-alloy, 

clad aluminum sheet. With respect to not 

clad aluminum sheet, common alloy sheet is 

manufactured from a 1XXX-, 3XXX-, or 

5XXX-series alloy as designated by the 

Aluminum Association. With respect to 

multi-alloy, clad aluminum sheet, common 

alloy sheet is produced from a 3XXX-series 

core, to which cladding layers are applied to 

either one or both sides of the core. The use 

of a proprietary alloy or non-proprietary alloy 

that is not specifically registered by the 

Aluminum Association as a discrete 

1XXX-, 3XXX-, or 5XXX-series alloy, but that 

otherwise has a chemistry that is consistent 

with these designations, does not remove an 

otherwise in-scope product from the scope. 

Common alloy sheet may be made to 

ASTM specification B209–14 but can also be 

made to other specifications. Regardless of 

specification, however, all common alloy 

sheet meeting the scope description is 

included in the scope. Subject merchandise 

includes common alloy sheet that has been 

further processed in a third country, 

including but not limited to annealing, 

tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, 

cutting, punching, and/or slitting, or any 

other processing that would not otherwise 

remove the merchandise from the scope of 

this investigation if performed in the country 

of manufacture of the common alloy sheet. 

Excluded from the scope of this 

investigation is aluminum can stock, which 

is suitable for use in the manufacture of 

aluminum beverage cans, lids of such cans, 

or tabs used to open such cans. Aluminum 

can stock is produced to gauges that range 

from 0.200 mm to 0.292 mm, and has an 

H–19, H–41, H–48, H–39, or H–391 temper. 

In addition, aluminum can stock has a 

lubricant applied to the flat surfaces of the 

can stock to facilitate its movement through 

machines used in the manufacture of 

beverage cans. Aluminum can stock is 

properly classified under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings 7606.12.3045 and 7606.12.3055. 

Where the nominal and actual 

measurements vary, a product is within the 

scope if application of either the nominal or 

actual measurement would place it within 

the scope based on the definitions set for the 

above. 

Common alloy sheet is currently 

classifiable under HTSUS subheadings 

7606.11.3060, 7606.11.6000, 7606.12.3096, 

7606.12.6000, 7606.91.3095, 7606.91.6095, 

7606.92.3035, and 7606.92.6095. Further, 

merchandise that falls within the scope of 

this investigation may also be entered into 

the United States under HTSUS subheadings 

7606.11.3030, 7606.12.3015, 7606.12.3025, 

7606.12.3035, 7606.12.3091, 7606.91.3055, 

7606.91.6055, 7606.92.3025, 7606.92.6055, 

7607.11.9090. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

description of the scope of this investigation 

is dispositive. 

Appendix II 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Changes from the Preliminary 

Determination 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Duty Drawback Adjustment 

Comment 2: Whether to Apply Partial 

Adverse Facts Available to Impol’s 

Reported Yield Loss and NonRecoverable Scrap Cost 

Comment 3: Calculation of Impol d.o.o.’s 

General and Administrative Expenses 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–04729 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–963] 

Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Results of the Expedited Second 

Five-Year Sunset Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this second 

sunset review, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

(CVD) order on certain potassium 

phosphate salts (phosphate salts) from 

the People’s Republic of China (China) 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of countervailable 

subsidies at the levels indicated in the 

‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’ 

section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable March 8, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3148. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 22, 2010, Commerce 

published its CVD order on phosphate 

salts from China in the Federal 

Register.1 On November 3, 2020, 

Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the second sunset review of 

the Order, pursuant to section 751(c) of 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES