alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1466.31 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of Conservation Innovation Grants (CIG) is to stimulate the development and adoption of innovative conservation approaches and technologies, including field research, while leveraging Federal investment in environmental enhancement and protection in conjunction with agricultural production. Notwithstanding any limitation of this part, NRCS administers CIG in accordance with this subpart. Unless otherwise provided for in this subpart, grants under CIG are subject to the provisions of 2 CFR part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.
( b ) Applications for CIG are accepted from the 50 States, District of Columbia, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, Virgin Islands of the United States, American Samoa, and Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
( c ) NRCS may award grants to applicants either through a national competition or, at the Chief's discretion, separate State-level components, either of which may be offered multiple times each fiscal year.
( d ) Applications for CIG should propose innovative projects or activities that— ( 1 ) Demonstrate the use of innovative approaches and technologies to leverage Federal investment in environmental enhancement and protection, in conjunction with agricultural production;
( 2 ) Promote innovative on-the-ground conservation, including pilot projects and field demonstrations of promising approaches or technologies;
( 3 ) Lead to the transfer of conservation technologies, management systems, and innovative approaches (such as market-based systems) into NRCS technical manuals and guides or to the private sector.
( e ) For NRCS to consider a proposal eligible for CIG funding, the applicant must clearly demonstrate the innovative features of the proposed technology or approach.
( f ) An applicant may demonstrate the innovative features of the proposed technology or approach through a variety of means, such as by establishing that it— ( 1 ) Uses a technology or approach that was studied sufficiently to indicate a high probability for success;
( 2 ) Demonstrates, evaluates, and verifies the effectiveness, utility, affordability, and usability of natural resource conservation technologies and approaches in the field;
( 3 ) Adapts and transfers conservation technologies, management, practices, systems, approaches, and incentive systems to improve performance and encourage adoption; or
( 4 ) Introduces proven conservation technologies and approaches to a geographic area or agricultural sector where that technology or approach is not currently in use.
( g ) Projects or activities under CIG shall comply with all applicable Federal, Tribal, State, and local laws and regulations throughout the duration of the project.
[84 FR 69280, Dec. 17, 2019, as amended at 85 FR 67647, Oct. 26, 2020]
NOT RECOMMENDED F OR FUL L -TEXT PUB L I CATI ON File Na me: 12a1149n.06
No. 12-5279
UNI TED STATES COURT OF A PPEAL S FOR THE SI XTH CI RCUI T
RI CKY L . J OHNSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. ARAMARK; COOKI E CREW S, W arde n; J ANE AN D J OHN DO ES; KSR OFF I CI AL S; ARAMARK CORRECTI ONAL SERVI CES, L L C; MARK GEDDES; BONN I E RESNI C,
Def endants-A

ppellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE U NI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DI STRI CT OF KENTUCKY

Be fore : MARTI

N and WHI TE, Circuit J udg es; ECONOMUS, District J udg e. *

PER CURI AM. Ricky L

. J ohnson, a Kentucky prisoner proce eding pro se, appea ls a district court’s order dismiss ing his civil rig hts action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. J ohnson also has filed a motion for the appointment of counse l. J ohnson is incar cer ated at the Kentucky State Reforma to ry
. I n October 2011, he filed an amende d complaint ag ainst Aramark Correc tional Service s, L L C, Ara mark’s Reg ional M anage r Mark Gedde s, Aramark Supervisor Bonnie Resnic, and Reforma tory Warden Cookie Crews. I n his complaint, J ohnson alleg ed that he suffe red injuries while working in the prison’s fo o d service depar tment, which is manag ed by Aramark. He alleg ed viol ations of § 1983; the Americans with Disabilit i es Ac t (ADA ), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.; and the Religious Fr eedom Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb et seq. The district court dismiss ed J ohnson’s action for failure to state a cla im.

The Honora

ble Peter C. Economus, United States Senior District J udg e for the Norther n * District of Ohio, sitting by desig nation.No. 12-5279 - 2 - The district court’s order is revie wed de novo. Grinter v. Knight , 532 F.3d 567, 571–72 (6th Cir. 2008). J ohnson does not raise his ADA and RFRA claims on appea l. No r does he arg ue that the district court err ed in dismiss ing his claims ag ainst Ara mark, Gedde s, and Resnic. There fore , these claims are deeme d waived. See Turner v. City of Taylor , 412 F. 3 d 6 2 9 , 6 3 9 (6th Cir. 2005). I n addition, J ohnson is not perm itted to add new defe ndants and claims on appea l. See Foster v. Barilow , 6 F.3d 405, 407 ( 6th Cir. 1993). J ohnson ar gu es t h at h e stated a claim ag ainst Crews. But his primary arg ument ag ainst Crews is that she fa iled to respond to his g rieva nces, and the denial of a g rieva nce or the failure to act upon the fil ing of a grie vance is insufficient to establish liability under § 1983

. S ee S h eh ee v. Luttr ell , 199 F.3d 295, 300 (6th Cir. 1999). To the extent that J ohnson arg ues that Crews is liable for the alleg ed unconstitutional acts of other office rs, “§ 1983 liability must be based on more than responde at superior, or the rig ht to control employ ees.” Id

. Acc ording ly , the district court proper ly dismiss ed the c laims asserted a g ainst Crews. The motion for a

ppointment of counsel is denied a nd the district court’s or der is af firmed.
808.004-70 Use of other priority sources. ( a ) *Veterans contracting priority.* In order to fulfill the requirements of 38 U.S.C. 8127-8128 (see subpart 819.70), contracting officers shall award contracts (see FAR 2.101 for the definition of contracts), as well as Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs), and orders against VA and GSA Federal Supply Schedules (FSS), providing priority in the awarding of such contracts to VIP-listed SDVOSBs first, then VOSBs.
( b ) *Strategic sourcing priorities and application of the VA Rule of Two.* To provide medical supplies in Federal Supply Classification (FSC) groups 65 and 66 efficiently and effectively the VA, through previous reform initiatives, has implemented key strategic sourcing contract vehicles (*e.g.,* prime-vendor, national contracts, VA FSS). If these strategic sourcing contracts were subject to the VA Rule of Two (see 802.101), they may be determined mandatory by the head of the contracting activity. Contracting officers shall consider these priority contract vehicles before using other existing contract vehicles.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1412.55 Provisions relating to tenants and sharecroppers. ( a ) No payment or assistance authorized under this part will be made by CCC if: ( 1 ) The landlord or operator has adopted a scheme or device for the purpose of depriving any tenant or sharecropper of the payments to which such person would otherwise be entitled under ARC or PLC. If any of such conditions occur or are discovered after payments have been made, all or any such part of the payments as the State committee may determine are required to be refunded to CCC; or
( 2 ) The landlord terminated a lease in violation of State law as determined by a State court.
( b ) [Reserved]
[79 FR 46339, Aug. 8, 2014, as amended at 83 FR 40659, Aug. 16, 2018]
#### Northern Trust Company, complainant, v. A. A. Allen (defendant), appellee. Sam Lichtenstein (defendant), appellant.

Gen. No. 33,091.

Opinion filed May 31, 1929.

Rehearing denied June 11, 1929.

Morris Sider and Morris K. Levinson, for appellant. Carl F. Lund, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: MENtal Health      

# Resource: MENtal Health

The We Think TwiceTM webpage on young men's mental health was developed based on the recognition by experts that young people struggle to know when to ask for help and men ask for help less frequently than other genders. Co-created with youth, this resource normalizes emotional ups and downs, shares signs that someone may need to ask for help, describes strategies for managing mental health, and provides additional resources. **Learn more.**
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14
PROMULGATED UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Penson Worldwide, Inc;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;
  /s/ Philip A. PendergraftPhilip A. PendergraftChief Executive Officerand principal executive officer
Exhibit 10.1






Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 
FOUR OAKS FINCORP, INC. 
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE AND BONUS PLAN


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 of the Four Oaks Fincorp, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase and Bonus Plan (Amended and Restated August 20, 2001) (the “Plan”) is effective as of March 25, 2013.


WHEREAS, Four Oaks Fincorp, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Plan; 


WHEREAS, after giving effect to prior stock splits, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has reserved a total of 368,554 shares of the Company's common stock for issuance under the Plan;


WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is in the best interest of the Company to increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the Plan by 150,000 shares; and


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13 of the Plan, the Board may make such amendments to the Plan as it shall deem advisable.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:


1.    The first sentence of Section 2 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:


Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 20 of the Plan, an aggregate of Five Hundred Eighteen Thousand Five Hundred Fifty-Four (518,554) shares (the “Shares”) of the Holding Company's common stock, par value one dollar ($1.00) per share (the “Common Stock”), shall be reserved for issuance under the Plan.


2.    Except as herein amended, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as previously adopted.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby certifies that this Amendment was duly adopted by the Board on March 25, 2013. 


FOUR OAKS FINCORP, INC.




By: /s/ Wanda J. Blow_______________
      Wanda J. Blow, Secretary
TH E COMMONWEALT H O FMASSACHUSETT S DEPARTMEN T O

F ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N c o BUREA U O

F WAST E PREVENTIO N DIVISIO N O

F CONSUME

RAN D TRANSPORTATIO N PROGRAM S NOTIC E O F PUBLI C HEARIN G £ Notic e i s hereb

y give n tha

t th e Departmen

t o f Environmenta

l Protectio n (MassDEP) , unde r it s authorit y pursuan t to M.G.L
. Chapte

r 111 , Section s 142

A throug h 142M , an

d i n conformanc e wit h M.G.L
. Chapte

r 30A , wil l hol dapubli c hearing on amendment s to 31 0 CM R7.36 , Transit Syste mImprovements
. Th

e purpos e o f

the publi c hearing i s t o solici t comment s on propose

d amendment

s to 31 0 CM R7.36
. Th

e proposed amendment

s wer e requeste d b y th e Massachusett

s Departmen

t o f Transportatio n (MassDOT) an d delet e th e requiremen

t tha t the MassDOT complet e th e fina l design o f

th e Re d Line/Blu e Lin e Connector
. Th e propose d amendment

s als o lengthe n the existin g publi c proces s requiremen t tha t MassDE P hol dapubli c meeting o n th e annua l updat e an d statu s repor

t withi n 6 0 day s t o 7 5 days an

d replace th

e ter mExecutiv e Offic e o f Transportatio n (EOT ) wit h MassDOT
. Public hearing s wil l b

e conducte

d t o receiv e publi c comment

, bot h ora l an d written , on th

e propose d regulation
. On : Thursday , Septembe r 13,201 2 - 1:0

0 p man d Thursday , Septembe

r 13,201 2

- 5:00-6:0 0 pm . Th e 5:0 0 P M publi c meetin

g wil l b e extende d afte r 6:0 0 p m a s neede d t o allo w fo r

al l intereste

d partie s t o presen t testimony
. At : Washingto n Stree t Conference Center

, 2 n dFloor , Room

s A , B , & C MassDEP , On

e Winte r Street , Boston , M A 02108
. Th e publi c meetin

g sit e i s wheelchai

r accessible
. Thi s informatio n i s availabl e i n alternative forma

t upon reques

t by contacting Michell e Waters-Ekanem, MassDEP' s Diversit y Director , a

t (617 ) 292

- 5751
. TD D Servic

e 1-866-539-762

2 o r 617-574-6868 , On

e Winte r Street , Boston , M A 02108 , Testimon y ma y b e presente

d orally and/o

r i n writin g a

t th e publi c hearing
. Followin g th e hearing , writte n testimon

y wil l b e accepte d unti l 5:0 0 p.m . o n Septembe

r 24,2012
. MassDE

P request s tha t writte n testimon

y b e submitted•electronicall

y vi ae-mail to : jerome.grafe@state.ma.us
. Writte n testimon y ma y also b e sen t to : Jerom

e Grafe , MassDEP , Burea u o f Wast e Prevention , On

e Winte r Street , 6t h Floor , Boston , M A 02108
. Copies o f th e regulatio n an

dbackgroun

d documen

t wil l b e available fo r

inspection durin g norma

l busines s hour

s a t MassDEP , On

e Winte r Street, Boston , MA
. I n addition , thes e document

s wil l b e availabl e o n MassDEP' s websit

e at : http://www.mass.gOv/dep/service/regulations/newregs.htm#propose d B y orde

r o f th e Department
. Kennet h L
. Kimmell , Commissione r
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ottawa
Savings Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jon L. KranovJon L. KranovPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2011/s/ Marc N. KingryJon L. KranovChief Financial OfficerMay 12, 2011




32
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








To the Board of Directors and Stockholders


Far East Energy Corporation and Subsidiaries:





We here by consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-136032, 333-132631 and 333-162019), Form S-1 (333-159905) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-148361, 333-148363, 333-126994, 333-129169, 333-134600, 333-164316 and 333-164462) of Far East Energy Corporation and Subsidiaries (a development stage company), of our reports dated March 12, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule included in Item 15(a)(2) and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,  which reports appear in this Form 10-K.





/s/ JonesBaggett LLP


JonesBaggett LLP (formerly Payne Smith & Jones, P.C.)


Dallas, Texas





March 12, 2010
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Prevention with Purpose: A Resource for Community and Technical Colleges      

# Report: Prevention with Purpose: A Resource for Community and Technical Colleges

This report (PDF, 12 pages) is designed to teach community college professionals how to plan, implement, and evaluate effective drug misuse prevention efforts on their campuses. **Learn more** (PDF, 12 pages).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 9, 2022

No. 04-19-00534-CV

EP ENERGY E&P COMPANY L.P.,

Appellant

v.

STOREY MINERALS, LTD, Maltsberger/Storey Ranch, LLC, and Rene R. Barrientos, Ltd.,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-05-00083-CVL

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice (not participating)

 Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

 Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

 Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

 Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

 

 On February 9, 2022, appellees filed a Motion for Rehearing and a Motion for En Banc 

Reconsideration. Appellees’ Motions are DENIED.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of March, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
89–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–952

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 4205, THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT, FY 2001

OCTOBER 10, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 616]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 616, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference

report to accompany H.R. 4205, the National Defense Authorization

Act, FY 2001, and against its consideration. The rule further provides that the conference report shall be considered as read.

Æ
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-22-00089-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Wichita County, Texas

Trial Court No. CCL1-FM2020-2242

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN THE INTEREST OF C.B., A CHILD
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On March 15, 2022, and March 30, 2022, we notified Appellant, in accordance 

with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless 

Appellant paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellant has

not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because Appellant has not complied with a procedural requirement and the 

Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015,1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: April 21, 2022

1

See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases 

in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’ fees).