alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1574 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to rename 

a site of the park. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2013 

Mr. TURNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act 

of 1992 to rename a site of the park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE DAYTON AVIATION HER4 ITAGE PRESERVATION ACT OF 1992. 

5 Section 101(b)(5) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage 

6 Preservation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww(b)(5)) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘Aviation Center’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘National Museum’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### §§ 1260.580-1260.600 [Reserved]
U.S. & CANADIAN COKE PLANTS

as of September 1, 2011

STATE/PROVINCE COMPANY CITY

Alabama ABC Coke (Drummond Company, Inc.) 1 Tarrant

Walter Coke 1 Birmingham

Illinois U. S. Steel 2 Granite City

Gateway Energy & Coke Company 1,3 Granite City

Indiana Indiana Harbor Coke Company 1,3 East Chicago

ArcelorMittal 2 Burns Harbor

U. S. Steel 2 Gary

Michigan DTE Energy Services 1 Ecorse

New York Tonawanda Coke Corp. 1Tonawanda

Ohio AK Steel Corp. 2 Middletown

Middletown Coke Co. 1,3,4 Middletown

ArcelorMittal

2 Warren

SunCoke Co. 1,3 Haverhill

Pennsylvania Erie Coke Corp. 1 Erie

ArcelorMittal 2 Monessen

DTE Energy Services (Shenango) 1Pittsburgh

U. S. Steel 2 Clairton

Virginia Jewell Coke and Coal 1,3 Vansant

West Virginia Mountain State Carbon 2Follansbee

Ontario ArcelorMittal (Dofasco) 2 Hamilton

U. S. Steel (Stelco) 2 Hamilton

U. S. Steel (Stelco) 2 Nanticoke

Essar Steel Algoma, Inc. 2Sault Ste. Marie

1

Plant is an independently owned/operated “merchant” coke plant.

2

Plant is owned/operated by an integrated steel company.

3

Plant is a heat recovery coke plant.

4 Under construction.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The
following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-Q
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of BioElectronics Corporation
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and
shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934
or any other securities law.





Each of
the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of BioElectronics Corporation.





/s/ Andrew Whelan
                
                /s/ Andrew WhelanAndrew
      J. Whelan
                
                Andrew
      J. WhelanPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
                
                Chief
      Financial OfficerBioElectronics
      Corporation
                
                BioElectronics
      Corporation
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2020

a0122 

# Order

Clerk January 29, 2020

159788

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159788

COA: 348057

Tuscola CC: 16

- 013774

- FC

BRENT WESLEY GEESEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of September 30, 2019, the prosecuting attorney was direc ted to answer

the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals. On

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu o f granting leave to appeal,

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Mentoring as a Component of Reentry      

# Resource: Mentoring as a Component of Reentry

This resource (PDF, 45 pages), developed by the National Reentry Resource Center, provides recommendations to help community-based organizations integrate adult mentoring into existing reentry programming. This resource can also help organizations build effective partnerships with correctional agencies, learn about promising practices in adult mentoring, such as peer mentoring, and increase effective data collection and evaluation through stronger collaboration between reentry programs and research partners. **Learn more** (PDF, 45 pages).
§ 1220.202 Term of office. ( a ) The members of the Board shall serve for terms of 3 years, except that the members appointed to the initial Board shall serve, proportionately, for terms of 1, 2, and 3 years.
( b ) Each member shall continue to serve until a successor is appointed by the Secretary and has accepted the position.
( c ) No member shall serve more than three consecutive 3-year terms in such capacity.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  NL
INDUSTRIES INC.'S CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH  31,  2000,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             133,698
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      138,959
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,231
<INVENTORY>                                        173,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   491,082
<PP&E>                                             759,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                     427,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,029,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              260,312
<BONDS>                                            244,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8,355
<OTHER-SE>                                         253,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,029,275
<SALES>                                            231,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   235,509
<CGS>                                              159,265
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      159,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       612
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     34,998
<INCOME-TAX>                                        11,199
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 23,708
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        23,708
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.46



</TABLE>
#### § 1005.15 Fluid milk product.

See § 1000.15.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1434.1 Applicability. ( a ) This part specifies the terms and conditions of Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) nonrecourse marketing assistance loan (MAL) and loan deficiency payment (LDP) Programs for honey. MAL gains and LDPs for honey are limited by the adjusted gross income provisions specified in part 1400 of this chapter.
( b ) Producers must comply with all provisions of this part and part 1421 of this chapter.
[74 FR 15656, Apr. 7, 2009, as amended at 80 FR 139, Jan. 2, 2015; 86 FR 70708, Dec. 13, 2021]
#### *Morgan vs. Froth and Needles.*

Debt.

Case 28.

Error to the general court; John.JU Bridges, Judge.

*General court. Jurisdiction. Statute. Interest.*

February 4.

Since the act of 1825, the general court has no jurisdiction for a less sum than $500.

It is error to give judgment for interest upon a note, executed in another state, unless the rate of interest is proved.

Mayes, for plaintiff; Combs, for defendant.

Judge Robertson,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

An action of debt was brought in this case, in the general court, on a note executed in Philadelphia, for $¡110 5S. The writ issued.in November, 1825, and judgment by default, was rendered by the court, for the principal and six percent interest, from the time the note was payable.

There is manifest error in this judgment.

Since the passage of the act of assembly of January, 1825, regulating the jurisdiction of the general court, that court could not take cognizance of this suit. And if it could, it erred in giving judgment for interest without proof, ascertaining the rate of interest in Pennsylvania, because, the *lex loci*contractees must govern, when no other place than that where the contract is made, is designated for its execution.

Judgment, therefore, reversed with costs.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Risk Assessment for Adolescents      

# Risk Assessment for Adolescents

This paper discusses how risk assessment tools for adolescents are constructed and used, as well as challenges for using them.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/191636.pdf
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEAN MARC FAREAU,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D23-683

[July 27, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Caroline Shepherd, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502015CF011633A.

Jean Marc Fareau, Crestview, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Paul J. Crecca, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K    of Haights Cross Communications, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.      By: /s/  Paul    J. Crecca    Name: Paul J. Crecca     Title:     Executive Vice President and Chief
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 13


                                  CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
    OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of New Skies Satellites N.V. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Form 20-F") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



        Dated:                          /s/ Daniel S. Goldberg
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Daniel S. Goldberg
                                        Chief Executive Officer



        Dated:                          /s/ Andrew Browne
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Andrew Browne
                                        Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter
63 of title 18, United States Code). A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to New Skies Satellites N.V. and will
be retained by New Skies Satellites N.V. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-703

Rev. 0, 4/2012

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 7/11/2013

Sample Number: 132618-001 Date Collected: 06/26/2013 08:00 Date Received: 6/26/2013

1st Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Arsenic, As 19.4 ug/L 0.10 0.030 DPC 07/01/2013 12:05 EPA 200.8

Beryllium, Be < 0.10 ug/L U 0.50 0.10 DAM 07/05/2013 EPA 200.7

Selenium, Se 512 ug/L 0.50 0.20 DPC 07/01/2013 12:05 EPA 200.8

Aluminum, Al 0.081 mg/L 0.020 0.0060 DAM 07/05/2013 18:29 EPA 200.7

Boron, B 189 mg/L 0.020 0.0040 DAM 07/05/2013 18:29 EPA 200.7

Iron, Fe 0.634 mg/L 0.050 0.010 DAM 07/05/2013 18:29 EPA 200.7

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN as N 1.54 mg/L 0.50 0.10 DMM 06/28/2013 EPA 351.2

Nitrate-Nitrite, NO3-NO2, as N 26.6 mg/L 0.10 0.020 DMM 06/28/2013 SM20 4500NO3 H

Phosphorus, Total, P 0.044 mg/L J 0.050 0.010 DMM 06/28/2013 EPA 365.4

Sample Number: 132618-002 Date Collected: 06/26/2013 08:00 Date Received: 6/26/2013

2nd Stage Feed 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Arsenic, As 56.3 ug/L 0.10 0.030 DPC 07/01/2013 12:10 EPA 200.8

Beryllium, Be < 0.10 ug/L U 0.50 0.10 DAM 07/05/2013 EPA 200.7

Selenium, Se 171 ug/L 0.50 0.20 DPC 07/01/2013 12:10 EPA 200.8

Aluminum, Al 10.1 mg/L 0.020 0.0060 DAM 07/05/2013 18:36 EPA 200.7

Boron, B 171 mg/L 0.020 0.0040 DAM 07/05/2013 18:36 EPA 200.7

Iron, Fe 2.47 mg/L 0.050 0.010 DAM 07/05/2013 18:36 EPA 200.7

Sample Number: 132618-003 Date Collected: 06/26/2013 08:00 Date Received: 6/26/2013

Bioreactor Effluent 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Arsenic, As 0.66 ug/L 0.10 0.030 DPC 07/01/2013 12:15 EPA 200.8

Beryllium, Be < 0.10 ug/L U 0.50 0.10 DAM 07/05/2013 EPA 200.7

Selenium, Se 3.4 ug/L 0.50 0.20 DPC 07/01/2013 12:15 EPA 200.8

Aluminum, Al 13.2 mg/L 0.020 0.0060 DAM 07/05/2013 18:44 EPA 200.7

Boron, B 136 mg/L 0.020 0.0040 DAM 07/05/2013 18:43 EPA 200.7

Iron, Fe 8.48 mg/L 0.050 0.010 DAM 07/05/2013 18:43 EPA 200.7

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN as N 3.29 mg/L 0.50 0.10 DMM 06/28/2013 EPA 351.2

Nitrate-Nitrite, NO3-NO2, as N 0.098 mg/L J 0.10 0.020 DMM 06/28/2013 SM20 4500NO3 H

Phosphorus, Total, P 1.12 mg/L 0.050 0.010 DMM 06/28/2013 EPA 365.4

Mountaineer Plant, 132618 Page 1 of 2
Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 7/11/2013

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 132618 Page 2 of 2