### 27228 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 2010 / Proposed Rules

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• E-mail: Res

_ Central

_

AC

_HP@ee.doe.gov (NOPM). Include docket number EE– 2008–BT–STD–0006 and/or RIN 1904– AB47, as appropriate, in the subject line of the message. Submit electronic comments in WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or ASCII file format and avoid the use of special characters or any form of encryption.

• Postal Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE–2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–2945. Please submit one signed original paper copy.

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, 950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20024. Please submit one signed original paper copy.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, visit the U.S. Department of Energy, Resource Room of the Building Technologies Program, 950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20024, (202) 586–2945, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Please call Ms. Brenda Edwards at the above telephone number for additional information regarding visiting the Resource Room.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. Wes Anderson, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program, EE–2J, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–7335. E-mail: Wes.Anderson@ee.doe.gov.

Ms. Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–7796. E-mail: Elizabeth.Kohl@hq.doe.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On March 25, 2010, DOE published a Federal Register notice announcing the availability of its preliminary technical support document for energy conservation standards for residential central air conditioners and heat pumps, as well as a public meeting to discuss and receive comment on the preliminary analysis. 75 FR 14368. The NOPM provides for the submission of comments by May 10, 2010. The public meeting to discuss the preliminary analysis was held on for May 5, 2010. A number of commenters stated at the public meeting that the time between the public meeting on May 5, 2010 and the end of the comment period on May 10, 2010 was not sufficient to address any issues that arose during the public meeting. DOE has determined that an extension of the public comment period is appropriate and is hereby extending the comment period. DOE will consider any comments received by May 17, 2010, and deems any comments received between publication of the NOPM and May 17, 2010 to be timely submitted.
Further Information on Submitting Comments

Under 10 CFR part 1004.11, any person submitting information that he or she believes to be confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit two copies: one copy of the document including all the information believed to be confidential, and one copy of the document with the information believed to be confidential deleted. DOE will make its own determination about the confidential status of the information and treat it according to its determination.

Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat submitted information as confidential include (1) a description of the items, (2) whether and why such items are customarily treated as confidential within the industry, (3) whether the information is generally known by or available from other sources, (4) whether the information has previously been made available to others without obligation concerning its confidentiality, (5) an explanation of the competitive injury to the submitting person which would result from public disclosure, (6) when such information might lose its confidential character due to the passage of time, and (7) why disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest.

Issued in Washington, DC, on May 7, 2010. Cathy Zoi, Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2010–11571 Filed 5–13–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6450–01–P DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES**  **SAFETY BOARD**

**10 CFR Part 1703**

**Proposed FOIA Fee Schedule Update**

**AGENCY :**  Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking.

**SUMMARY :**  Pursuant to 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6) of the Board’s regulations, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board is publishing its proposed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Fee Schedule Update and solicits comments from interested organizations and individual members of the public.

**DATES :**  To be considered, comments must be mailed or delivered to the address listed below by 5 p.m. on or before June 14, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Comments on the proposed fee schedule should be mailed or delivered to the Office of the General Counsel, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004. All comments will be placed in the Board’s public files and will be available for inspection between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except on federal holidays), in the Board’s Public Reading Room at the same address.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Brian Grosner, General Manager, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004–2901, (202) 694–
7060.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The FOIA requires each Federal agency covered by the Act to specify a schedule of fees applicable to processing of requests for agency records. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(i). Pursuant to 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6) of the Board’s regulations, the Board’s General Manager will update the FOIA Fee Schedule once every 12 months. Previous Fee Schedule Updates were published in the Federal Register and went into effect, most recently, on May 6, 2009, 74 FR 20934. The Board’s proposed fee schedule is consistent with the guidance. The components of the proposed fees (hourly charges for search and review and charges for copies of requested documents) are based upon the Board’s specific cost.

Board Action

Accordingly, the Board proposes to establish the following schedule of updated fees for services performed in response to FOIA requests:


### 27229 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 93 / Friday, May 14, 2010 / Proposed Rules

D EFENSE 

### N UCLEAR 

### FACILITIES 

### S AFETY 

### B OARD 

### S CHEDULE OF 

### F EES FOR 

### FOIA S ERVICES [Implementing 10 CFR 1703.107(b)(6)]

Search or Review Charge ........................................................................ $77.00 per hour. Copy Charge (paper) ................................................................................ $.12 per page, if done in-ho use, or generally available commercial rate (approximately $.10 per page). Electronic Media ....................................................................................... $5.00. Copy Charge (audio cassette) ................................................................. $3.00 per cassette. Duplication of DVD ................................................................................... $25.00 for each individual DVD; $16.50 for each additional individual DVD. Copy Charge for large documents ( e.g., maps, diagrams) ..................... Actual commercial rates.

Dated: May 7, 2010. Brian Grosner, General Manager.
[FR Doc. 2010–11375 Filed 5–13–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3670–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2010–0347; Airspace Docket No. 07–AWA–2 RIN 2120–AA66]** 

**Proposed Modification of Class B Airspace; Chicago, IL** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  This action proposes to modify the Chicago, IL, Class B airspace area by expanding the existing airspace to ensure containment of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) aircraft conducting instrument approach procedures within Class B airspace, and segregating IFR aircraft at Chicago O’Hare International Airport (ORD) and Visual Flight Rules (VFR) aircraft operating in the vicinity of Chicago Class B airspace. Additional Class B airspace would support operations to ORD’s triple parallel runways and three additional parallel runways planned for the near future. This action would enhance safety, improve the flow of air traffic, and reduce the potential for midair collision in the Chicago terminal area, further supporting the FAA’s national airspace redesign goal of optimizing terminal and en route airspace areas to reduce aircraft delays and improve system capacity.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before July 13, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  Send comments on this proposal to the United States (U.S.) Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001; telephone: (202) 366–9826. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA–2010–0347 and Airspace Docket No. 07–AWA–2 at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Colby Abbott, Airspace and Rules Group, Office of System Operations Airspace and AIM, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.

Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 2010–0347 and Airspace Docket No. 07– AWA–2) and be submitted in triplicate to the Docket Management Facility ( see **ADDRESSES** section for address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ‘‘ Comments to Docket Nos. FAA–2010–0347 and Airspace Docket No. 07–AWA–2. ’’ The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.

All communications received on or before the specified closing date for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of comments received. All comments submitted will be available for examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the docket. Availability of NPRMs

An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA’s Web page at http:// www.faa.gov/air

_ traffic/publications/ airspace

_ amendments/.

You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office ( see **ADDRESSES** section for address and phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at the office of the Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137.

Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future NPRMs should contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, (202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application procedure. Background

In 1970, the FAA issued a final rule (35 FR 8880) which established the Chicago, Ill., Terminal Control Area to replace the Chicago, Ill., control zone. As a result of the Airspace Reclassification final rule (56 FR 65638), which became effective in 1993, the
terms ‘‘terminal control area’’ and

‘‘ airport radar service area’’ were replaced by ‘‘ Class B airspace area, ’’ and

‘‘ Class C airspace area, ’’ respectively. The primary purpose of a Class B airspace area is to reduce the potential for midair collisions in the airspace surrounding airports with high density air traffic operations by providing an