alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 109–133—DEC. 20, 2005 119 STAT. 2573

Public Law 109–133

109th Congress

An Act

To amend the Act of June 7, 1924, to provide for the exercise of criminal jurisdiction.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDIAN PUEBLO LAND ACT AMENDMENTS.

The Act of June 7, 1924 (43 Stat. 636, chapter 331), is amended

by adding at the end the following:

‘‘SEC. 20. CRIMINAL JURISDICTION.

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise provided by Congress,

jurisdiction over offenses committed anywhere within the exterior

boundaries of any grant from a prior sovereign, as confirmed by

Congress or the Court of Private Land Claims to a Pueblo Indian

tribe of New Mexico, shall be as provided in this section.

‘‘(b) JURISDICTION OF THE PUEBLO.—The Pueblo has jurisdiction,

as an act of the Pueblos’ inherent power as an Indian tribe, over

any offense committed by a member of the Pueblo or an Indian

as defined in title 25, sections 1301(2) and 1301(4), or by any

other Indian-owned entity.

‘‘(c) JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES.—The United States

has jurisdiction over any offense described in chapter 53 of title

18, United States Code, committed by or against an Indian as

defined in title 25, sections 1301(2) and 1301(4) or any Indianowned entity, or that involves any Indian property or interest.

‘‘(d) JURISDICTION OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO.—The State

of New Mexico shall have jurisdiction over any offense committed

by a person who is not a member of a Pueblo or an Indian as

25 USC 331 note.

Native

Americans.

New Mexico.

Dec. 20, 2005

[S. 279]

119 STAT. 2574 PUBLIC LAW 109–133—DEC. 20, 2005

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 279:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

July 26, considered and passed Senate.

Dec. 6, considered and passed House.

Æ

defined in title 25, sections 1301(2) and 1301(4), which offense

is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.’’.

Approved December 20, 2005.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1416.404 Eligible orchardists and nursery tree growers. ( a ) Once the requisite qualifying eligible mortality loss is determined according to § 1416.403, to be eligible for TAP payments, the eligible orchardist or nursery tree grower must: ( 1 ) Have planted, or be considered to have planted (by purchase prior to the loss of existing stock planted for commercial purposes) trees, bushes, or vines for commercial purposes, or have a production history, for commercial purposes, of planted or existing trees, bushes, or vines;
( 2 ) Have suffered eligible losses of eligible trees, bushes, or vines, as a result of a natural disaster or related condition;
( 3 ) Have continuously owned the stand from the time of the disaster until the time that the TAP application is submitted.
( b ) A new owner of an orchard or nursery who does not meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section may receive TAP payments approved for the previous owner of the orchard or nursery and not paid to the previous owner, if the previous owner of the orchard or nursery agrees to the succession in writing and if the new owner: ( 1 ) Acquires ownership of trees, bushes, or vines for which benefits have been approved;
( 2 ) Agrees to complete all approved practices that the original owner has not completed; and
( 3 ) Otherwise meets and assumes full responsibility for all provisions of this part, including refund of payments made to the previous owner, if applicable.
( c ) A producer seeking payment must not be ineligible under the restrictions applicable to citizenship and foreign corporations contained in § 1416.3(b) and must meet all other requirements of subpart A of this part.
( d ) Federal, State, and local governments and agencies and political subdivisions thereof are not eligible for payment under this subpart.
[79 FR 21097, Apr. 14, 2014, as amended at 83 FR 49472, Oct. 2, 2018; 85 FR 10968, Feb. 26, 2020]
| -   | Establish a GLN center at Party A’s location; |
|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

| -   | Programs to offer1-3 Months Hotel Programs + Internship / RCA programs / Other SSCC programs; |
|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| -   |  Party B is responsible of investing in video conferencing equipment and curriculum |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | Party A is responsible of obtaining government approval, classrooms with teaching facilities and teacher dormitory. |
|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | 1 to 3 months AHLEI training plus internship program |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | Residential Care Assistant program |
|---------------|------------------------------------|

| -   | Other Sprott-Shaw Community College programs |
|---------------|----------------------------------------------|

| -   | This agreement will be effective from the date on which both parties sign and valid for 10 years. |
|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | Renewal or termination of the agreement will be discussed by both parties 6 months before the expiry date. |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 1221.200 Terms defined.

As used throughout this subpart, unless the context otherwise requires, terms shall have the same meaning as the definition of such terms in subpart A of this part.
#### Elenora Peyton (plaintiff), appellee, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (defendant), appellant.

Gen. No. 33,293.

*614Opinion filed May 29, 1929.

Hoyne, O’Connor & Rubinkam, for appellant. Packard, Barnes & MeCaughey, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Youth Financial Education:  Practicing money skills and decision-making      

# Youth Financial Education:  Practicing money skills and decision-making

Making their own financial decisions starts to set teens and young adults apart. When children are ages 13 to 21, you can give them chances to make money choices, experience natural consequences, and reflect on their decisions.

https://www.consumerfinance.gov/consumer-tools/money-as-you-grow/young-adulthood/
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 15, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 03-50889

_______________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BRENT HUGHES,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

No. SA-03-CR-52

________________________________________________________________

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and

sentence of Brent Hughes. See United States v. Hughes, No. 03-

50889 (Oct. 21, 2004). The Supreme Court vacated and remanded for

further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, 125 S.

Ct. 738 (2005). See Hughes v. United States, 125 S. Ct. 1027

(2005). We requested and received supplemental letter briefs

addressing the impact of Booker.

The Government concedes that Hughes preserved his
2

sentencing challenge before the district court, and that the error

was not harmless. Accordingly, Hughes’s conviction is AFFIRMED,

and his sentence is VACATED and REMANDED for further proceedings

consistent with this opinion and Booker.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1423.9 Examination of warehouses.

Before approval, and while a storage agreement is in effect, a warehouse must be examined by a person designated by CCC periodically to determine compliance with this part. CCC or any other agency of USDA shall, at any time, have the right to inspect the warehouse storage facilities and any applicable records. Inspection or examination by CCC does not absolve the warehouse operator of any failure to comply with this part that CCC does not discover. Failure to allow access to facilities as required under this paragraph will result in rejection or revocation of approval.
Exhibit 32.1





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Video Without Boundaries, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-K SB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as
     amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
     hereof (the "Report"), I, V. Jeffrey Harrell, Chief Executive Officer,
     President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,
     certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report, as amended, fully complies with the requirements
                  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report, as amended, fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and result of operations of the Company.



By: /s/ V. Jeffrey Harrell
----------------------------------------
V. Jeffrey Harrell, Chief Executive Officer, President and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

August 31, 2005
#### MIGUEL ARROYO *v.*GLENN FOLLMER ET AL.

(AC 23490)

Lavery, C. J., and Bishop and Hennessy, Js.

Submitted on briefs September 19

officially released November 4, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### § 1409.101 Applicability.

This subpart specifies the eligibility requirements and payment calculations for the MFP for 2019 agricultural commodities. MFP will provide payments with respect to agricultural commodities that have been impacted by trade actions of foreign governments resulting in the loss of exports. Any specific program requirements for a commodity will be specified in a notice of funding availability published by the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) in the Federal Register.
#### § 1250.306 Commercial eggs or eggs.

*Commercial eggs* or *eggs* means eggs from domesticated chickens which are sold for human consumption either in shell egg form or for further processing into egg products.
Cite as 2015 Ark. 9

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CR-14-991

RAYMOND D. LEACH III

PETITIONER

V.

HONORABLE J.W. LOONEY, CIRCUIT

JUDGE

RESPONDENT

Opinion Delivered January 15, 2015

PRO SE PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

[POLK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

NO. 57CR-09-95]

PETITION MOOT.

PER CURIAM

Now before us is a pro se petition for writ of mandamus filed by petitioner Raymond D.

Leach III. On July 9, 2012, petitioner filed in the Polk County Circuit Court a pro se petition

for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2011). In the

mandamus petition, petitioner seeks to have Circuit Judge J.W. Looney enter a final order on

the Rule 37.1 petition.

 Judge Looney timely filed a response to the petition to which was appended a copy of

a letter order, entered October 3, 2012, expressing that the petition was without merit and

directing the prosecuting attorney to prepare a final order denying relief. Respondent states that

he was unaware that the final order was never drafted and entered until this mandamus action

was filed. Respondent appended to the response a copy of the final order that was subsequently

entered on November 25, 2014, denying the Rule 37.1 petition.

As the Rule 37.1 petition that is the subject of the mandamus action has been acted on

by the respondent, the mandamus action is now moot with respect to the request that the

respondent be directed to enter a final order on it. See Glaze v. Reynolds, 2013 Ark. 43 (per
Cite as 2015 Ark. 9

curiam); McCoy v. Pope, 2010 Ark. 183 (per curiam). Even though the respondent has acted on

the petition that is the subject of the mandamus action, rendering it moot, we take this

opportunity to note that the prompt resolution of all matters before a court is vital to the

administration of justice. McNichols v. Elmore, 2014 Ark. 133 (per curiam); Paige v. Reynolds, 2013

Ark. 73 (per curiam); Nelson v. Glover, 2012 Ark. 307 (per curiam); Higgins v. Proctor, 2009 Ark. 496

(per curiam).

In order for the courts to comply with this judicial obligation, a system must be in place

in every judicial district whereby each judge is made fully aware of the status of his or her docket. 

See McNichols, 2014 Ark. 133; see also Paige, 2013 Ark. 73; Goodwin v. Keaton, 2012 Ark. 137 (per

curiam). We urge all judicial districts to ensure that the district has a plan whereby judges are

aware of the state of the docket for all cases in their courts. See Nelson, 2012 Ark. 307.

Petition moot.

Raymond D. Leach III, pro se petitioner.

Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Karen Virginia Wallace, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for respondent.

2
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Diamond Discoveries
      International Corp. (the “ ***Company*** ”)
      for
      the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “ ***Report*** ”),
      I,
      Edward C. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





1.  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                September 30, 2008By:
            /s/
                Edward C. WilliamsName:
                Edward C. WilliamsTitle:*Chief Financial
                Officer*
§ 1260.310 Domestic assessments. ( a ) A $1.00 per head assessment on cattle sold shall be paid by the producer of the cattle in the manner designated in § 1260.311.
( b ) If more than one producer shares the proceeds received for the cattle sold, each such producer is obligated to pay that portion of the assessments which are equivalent to the producer's proportionate share of the proceeds.
( c ) Failure of the collecting person to collect the assessment on each head of cattle sold as designated in § 1260.311 shall not relieve the producer of his obligation to pay the assessment to the appropriate qualified State beef council or the Cattlemen's Board as required in § 1260.312.
§ 1210.325 Procedure. ( a ) A simple majority of Board members shall constitute a quorum and any action of the Board shall require the concurring votes of a majority of those present and voting. At assembled meetings all votes shall be cast in person.
( b ) For routine and noncontroversial matters which do not require deliberation and the exchange of views, and for matters of an emergency nature when there is not enough time to call an assembled meeting, the Board may act upon a majority of concurring votes of its members cast by mail, telegraph, telephone, or by other means of communication; *Provided,* That each member receives an accurate, full, and substantially identical explanation of each proposition. Telephone votes shall be promptly confirmed in writing. All votes shall be recorded in the Board minutes.
[54 FR 24545, June 8, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 10798, Feb. 28, 1995]
MEETING ROSTER

NRI Nursing Research Initiative (ORD program, managed by HSR&D)

Health Services Research Parent IRG

Office of Research & Development

NRI1 - Nursing Research Initiative

NRI1

Agenda Seq Num - 00265229

August 29, 2013

CHAIRPERSON

JONES, CHERYL B., PHD, RN

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR

HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS COORDINATOR

SCHOOL OF NURSING

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL

CHAPEL HILL, NC 27599

MEMBERS

GOODMAN, PETRA, PHD, MSN *

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR

DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH

SCHOOL OF NURSING

THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA

WASHINGTON, DC 20064

HIGGINS, PATRICIA A., PHD, RN, MSN

NURSE RESEARCHER

GERIATRIC RES AND EDUCATION CLINICAL CTR

CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER

ASSOC PROF, FRANCES PAYNE BOLTON SCH OF NURSING

CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY

CLEVELAND, OH 44106

KENNY, DEBORAH J., PHD, MSN *

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR

ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR RESEARCH

CAROL SCHOFFSTALL ENDOWED CHAIR

BETH-EL COLLEGE OF NURSING AND HLTH SCIENCES

UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT COLORADO SPRINGS

COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80918

KESTER, KENT E. MD *

STAFF PHYSICIAN, INFECTIOUS DISEASE SVC

DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE

WALTER REED NATIONAL MILITARY MEDICAL CENTER

ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH

PROFESSOR OF MEDICINE, USUHS

BETHESDA, MD 20814

POWELL-COPE, GAIL M. PHD, RN, MSN *

DIRECTOR

VA HSR&D/RR&D CENTER OF EXCELLENCE

CHIEF NURSING SERVICE/RESEARCH

JAMES A HALEY VA MEDICAL CENTER

ASSIST DIRECTOR, COLLEGE OF NURSING, UNIV OF S FL

TAMPA, FL 33612

SMITH, BRIDGET M., PHD

SOCIAL SCIENCE ANAYLST

HSR&D, CMCCC

EDWARD HINES JR VA HOSPITAL

RESEARCH ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY

CHICAGO, IL 60141

SWANSON, KATHLEEN M. MS

ASSISTANT CENTER DIRECTOR

CLINICAL RESEARCH PHARMACY COORDINATING CENTER

VA COOPERATIVE STUDIES PROGRAM

ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87106

UPHOLD, CONSTANCE R. RN, PHD

ASSOC DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION & OUTCOMES RES

GERIATRIC RESEARCH EDUCATION CLINICAL CENTER

GAINESVILLE VA MEDICAL CENTER

ASSOC PROFESSOR, DEPT OF AGING & GERIATRICS

COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE, FL 32608

ZICKMUND, SUSAN L., PHD

CO-CHIEF AND DIRECTOR, QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CORE

CNTR FOR HEALTH EQUITY RESEARCH & PROMOTION

VA PITTSBURGH HEALTH CARE SYSTEM

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF MEDICINE

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

PITTSBURGH, PA 15206

SCIENTIFIC REVIEW OFFICER

KELLEY, PATRICIA WATTS, RN, PHD

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION

OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

WASHINGTON, DC 20420

* Temporary Member. For grant applications, temporary members

may participate in the entire meeting or may review only selected

applications as needed.

Consultants are required to absent themselves from the room

during the review of any application if their presence would

constitute or appear to constitute a conflict of interest.

Page:

08/01/2013

CM6065J 1
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James Sikora, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Tao Minerals Ltd.
      for the period ended July 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Tao Minerals Ltd.                                                                  

Dated: January 4, 2012

| | /s/
      James Sikora                                                                           
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | James Sikora                                                                                     
| | President, Chief Financial Officer and Director                                                  
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
| | TAO MINERALS LTD.                                                                                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tao Minerals
Ltd. and will be retained by Tao Minerals Ltd. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### § 1216.86 Separability.

If any provision of this subpart is declared invalid or the applicability thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this subpart or the applicability thereof to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.