iXECElVED I r 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAlfg/VRING DOCKET 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATT^ OF \:y/^ n^ 

EMPIRE FLIGHT icADEMY 

Respondent 

FDMS NO. FAA-^010-0290 crz 

HONORABLE RONNIE A. YODER """' rSSSl 

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE TJ 

Hearing Date: NONE 

Hearing Location: NOlSfE ASSIGNED 

ASSIGNED 

RESPONDENT'S MOTIOiy FOR DECISION 

COMES NOW, Empire Flight Academy (hereinafter "EFA"), Respondent herein, by 

and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rule 1^218 of the Procedural Rules (14 

C.F.R. Part 13), and hereby moves for dismissal of th^ Complaint, which alleges that 

Empire Flight Academy was the operator of a Diamotid DA-20 aircraft, identification number 

N383CA between April 8,2009 and Jirne 1,2009. NO genuine issues of material fact exist as to 

whether EFA was the operator of N383CA at that tim^. Therefore, EFA is entitled to judgment as 

I 

matter of law. 

The present case began as a reincarnation of aij action initially filed against Empire 

Airways, which resulted in a voluntary withdrawal and an award of attorney fees and expenses 

under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 5 U.S-C. § 504. (See FAA Docket No. CP 

10EA0008 and DMS Number FAA-2010-0787). The original civil penalty action was brought by 

the Regional Counsel for the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"), Eastern Region, bearing 
FAA Docket No. CP 10EA0002 and DMS Number ltAA-2010-0191. In the previous underiying 

action, the FAA alleged that Empire Airways operated'NSiSCA in violation of various Federal 

Aviation Regulations.' On Jime 21,2010, the FAA filed a Motion to Withdraw Complaint 

Without Prejudice. In is Motion, the FAA admitted that it had filed its Complaint against the 

wrong entity.^ I 

In the present case, the FAA once again filed ^ts Complaint against the wrong entity (i.e.. 

Empire Fligltf Academy). As more fiilly discussed herein, all of the evidence establishes that 

Glass Cockpit Aviation, LLC ("GCA") was the operator of N383CA during all times material to 

the Complaint (i.e., between April 8,2009 through June 1,2009). Therefore, Empire Flight 

Academy ("EFA") was not the operator of N383CA, ks alleged. Accordingly, EFA is entitled to 

judgment as a matter of law. 

More specifically, between September 1,2008 and September 1,2009 (i.e., during the time 

of the alleged violations), N383CA was operated and insured by GCA through an insurance policy 

issued by USAIG, See Exhibit 1. Thereafter, betweeh September 1,2009 and September 1,2010, 

N383CA was operated and insured by EFA through a^ insurance policy issued by Allianz Global 

Risks. See Exhibit 2. 

Therefore, the pleadings and other supporting documentation establish that there is no 

genuine issue of material fact to be resolved at the heajring regarding the allegation that EFA was 

the operator of N383CA between April 8,2009 and Jyne 1,2009. Therefore, EFA is entitled to 

judgment as a matter of law. 

' Complaint, Case No. CP10EA0002, Docket No. FAA-2010-0191 (February 6,2010). 

^ Stating that Empire Flight Academy, not Empire Airways, had committed the alleged violations. 
In support thereof. Respondent states the foll(j)wing: 

PROCEDURAL fflSTORY 

The Complaint filed in this matter on April 8,2011, alleges the following, in part: 

1. At all times mentioned herein, Empire Fli^t Academy was the operator of a Diamond 

DA-20 aircraft, identification number N3^3CA (hereinafter "the aircraft"). Complaint 

at \\ (emphasis added). ! 

2. OJEI or about June 1,2009, Empire Flight AJcademy proceeded to operate the aircraft on 

alight to Republic Airport, Farmingdale, NY (hereinafter "the June 1 flight"). 

Complaint at |6 (emphasis added). j 

3. Count III of the Complaint alleges the following regulatory violations; 14 C.F.R. §§ 

91.405(b)^ 91.407(a)(l)\ and 91.407(a)(2). ^ 

^ Section 91.405(b) states that each owner or operator\of an aircraft shall ensure that maintenance 

personnel make appropriate entries in the aircraft maintenance records indicating the aircraft has 

been approved for return to service (emphasis added). 

'^ Section 91.407(a)(1) states that no person may operate an aircraft that has undergone 

maintenance, preventative maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless it has been approved for 

return to service by a person authorized under Section 43.7 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

(emphasis added). 

^ Section 91.407(a)(1) states that no person may operdfe an aircraft that has undergone 

maintenance, preventative maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless the maintenance record 

entry required by Sections 43.9 or 43.11, as applicable^ of the Federal Aviation Regulations has 

been made (emphasis added). 
ISSUE PRESENTE •ijr D 

WHETHER GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT EXIST CONCERNING 

THE ALLEGATIONS THAT EMPIRE FLIGHT ACADEMY WAS THE 

OPERATOR OF N383CA AT ANY TIME MATERIAL TO THE COMPLAINT? 

STANDARD FOR SUMl^lARY JUDGMENT 

A party seeking summary judgment must "demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of 

material fact in dispute and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." See, 

Accuracy In^edia, Inc., v. National Transportation ^afety Board, Civil Action No. 03-00024 

(CKK),3(D.D.C.2006). 

As more fully described below, no genuine issue as to any material fact exists whether EFA 

I 

was the operator of N383CA at any time material to the Complaint filed in this matter (i.e., April 8, 

2009 through Jime 1,2009). Accordingly, since the pleadings and other supporting documentation 

establish that there are no genuine issues as to any material fact to be resolved at the hearing, EFA 

is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Therefore, ^e Complaint must be dismissed with 

prejudice. 

MATERIAL FACTS NQT IN DISPUTE 

1. At all times material to the Complaint filed in this matter (i.e., April 8,2009 through 

June 1, 2009), Clyde Air Leasing, LLC (hereinafter "Clyde Air") was the owner of a 

2007 Diamond DA-20 aircraft, registration number N383CA. See Exhibit 3. 

2. Between on or about September 1,2008 through September 1, 2009, Clyde Air, as the 

ovmer of N383CA, entered mto an agreement with Glass Cockpit Aviation, LLC 

(hereinafter "GCA"), whereby GCA leased or rented the aircraft to 3"* parties for 

compensation. 
3. Between on or about September 1,2008 tprough September 1,2009, GCA obtained a 

policy fi"om USAIG (Policy No. 400AC-52017) for the purpose of obtaining insurance 

coverage for the commercial use of N383pA, owned by Clyde Air. See Exhibit 1. 

4. Under the terms of the insurance policy with USAIG (hereinafter the "GCA Insurance 

Policy"), the name and address of the "Policyholder" was as follows: 

Glass Cockpits Aviation, LLC 

Republic Airport j 

/ 1300 New Highway-Hangar 2 

V Farmingdale, NY 11735 

See Exhibit 1. 

5. Under the terms of the GCA Insurance Policy, the following pilots were covered: 

With respect to Diamond DA 20, Diam(^d DA 40, and Cirrus SR 20: 

Any Pilot approved by the "Policyholder" [i.e., Glass Cockpit Aviation, LLC\ 

See Exhibit 2 (emphasis added). 

6. Between on or about September 1,2009 through September 1,2010, Empire Flight 

Academy (hereinafter "EFA") obtained a policy from Allianz Global Risks US 

Insurance Company (Policy No, A4GA000433709AM) for the purpose of obtaining 

insurance coverage for the commercial usej of N383CA, owned by Clyde Air. See 

Exhibit 2. 

7. Under the terms of the agreement v^th Alli|anz (hereinafter the "EFA Insurance 

Policy"), the name and address of the "Naijied Insured" was as follows: 

Empire Flight Academy 

Republic Airport 

Route 109, Hangar 3 

Farmingdale, NY 11735 
See Exhibit 2. 

8. The incident alleged in the Complaint occurred between April 8,2009 and June 1,2009. 

1 

See Complaint at 1f11 - 10. 

9. Thus, at all times material to the Complaiftt, the aircraft was insured by USAIG under 

policy no. 400AC-52017 by and through (ilass Cockpit Aviation, LLC ("GCA") as the 

"Policyholder." | 

ya. At all times material the Complaint, GCA was located at Republic Airport, 1300 New 

c Highway - Hangar 2, Farmingdale, NY 1^735. 

11. Accordingly, GCA was the only company Ithat was authorized by USAGI (i.e., the 

insurer) and Clyde Air (i.e., the owner) to Operate N383CA between September 1, 

2008 and September 1,2009, during the tejrm of the GCA Insurance Policy. 

12. Thus, EFA was not the operator of N383dA at any time between April 8,2009 and 

Jime 1,2009, as alleged in the Compliant. 

13. In fact, EFA did not become the operator (|>f N383CA until after September 1,2009, 

when it first obtained a policy from Allianz (Policy No. A4GA000433709AM) for the 

purpose of obtaining insurance coverage fot the commercial use of N383CA, owned by 

Clyde Air. See Exhibit 2. 

ARGUMENT 

NO GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL F^CT EXIST CONCERNING THE 

ALLEGATIONS THAT EMPIRE FLIGHTJ ACADEMY WAS THE OPERATOR 

OF N383CA AT ANY TIME MATERIAL TO THE COMPLAINT. 
Although the Complaint alleges that "at all times relevant herein" (i.e., April 8,2009 

through June 1,2009), Empire Flight Academy was t|he operator of a Diamond DA-20 aircraft, 

identification number N383CA, no genuine issues of material fact exist concerning whether EFA 

was the operator of the aircraft during that time periojd. Accordingly, EFA is entitled to judgment 

as a matter of law. 

Rule, 13,218(f), which governs motions for decision, indicates the documents that may 

be considerq^d by the law judge in ruling on a party's inotion for decision. The Ride provides as 

follows: 

The adminisfrative law judge shall grant a party's motion for decision if the pleadings, 

depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions, matters that the administrative law 

judge has officially noticed, or evidence introduced during the hearing show that there is 

no genuine issue of material fact and that the party making the motion is entitled to a 

decision as a matter of law, 

14 C.F.R. 13.218(f)(5); see also In the Matter of Horizon Air Industries, Inc., FAA Order No. 

96-24 (1996 FAA LEXIS 2058 (1996)). 

I 

In American Airlines, Part 252 Enforcement, (prders 82-6-137, et al., 96 C.A.B. 114 

I 

(1982), the Civil Aeronautics Board noted that: 

The Board has stated that in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party 

opposing a motion for summary judgment "m^y not rest upon the mere allegations or 

denials of [its] pleading, but [its] response... .must set forth specific facts showing that 

there is a genuine issue for trial". 

Citing, Aeromerica, Inc., Order 81-8-23, p.4. 

In the present case, the pleadings and evidence provided herewith (i.e., Exhibits 1 through 

3) establish that no genuine issues of material fact exist. Therefore, EFA is entitled to a decision as 

a matter of law concerning the allegation that it operated N383CA at all times relevant in the 

Complaint. Accordingly, the Complaint must be dismissed as a matter of law. 
The Complainant rests upon the mere allegations of its pleading, without setting forth 

specific facts to show that there is a genuine issue for trial concerning the allegation that at all 

times relevant to the Complaint, EFA was the operator of N383CA. 

To the contrary. Respondent provides herewit^i uncontroverted evidence which establishes 

that from at least September 1,2008 through September 1,2009, GCA was the operator of 

N383CA. Since the Complaint concerns a specific flight that occurred on June 1,2009, EFA was 

clearly not the operator of N383CA at that time. Accprdingly, the uncontested evidence 

establishes l^at there is no genuine issue as to any majterial fact to be resolved at the hearing 

concerning which company operated N383CA on Junle 1,2009. 

I 

I 

CONCLUSION 

I 

Since the Complainant has not and cannot set forth specific facts showing that there is a 

genuine issue for trial, EFA is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfiilly reqikests that the Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge, dismiss the Complajnt with 

Dated: June 3,2011 

Respect: 

rON, ESQ. 

Firm 

Court, Suite 450 

jckvill^ MD 20850 

Tel: (301) 294-8550 

Fax: (301) 294-2525 

Greg@AyiationLawExperts.com 

Counsel for Respondent 
EXHIBIT 1 
USAIG All-dear Policy 

Coverage Summary Page 

Policy No. 400AC'52017 

Former Policy No. 400AC-51353 

The Coverage Summary Pa^es, along with your policy and a|iy attached forms and endorsements you have, form 

your complete insurance policy. 

NairtB and Address of "Policyholdor:" 

Glass Cockpit Aviation, LLC 

Republic Airport 

1300 New Highway - Hangar 2 

Fanmingdala, New Yoric 11735 

Your Policy Period is from September 1, 2008 to Septembejr 1, 2009 beginning and ending at 12:01 A.M. Local 

Standard Time at the address shown above. 

"Poricyholde(f^is(D) A. Individual B. Corporation C. Partnership D. Limited Liability Company 

Your business is: Flight Instruction, Rental, and Sightseeing | 

You own the aircraft by yourself. 

Aircraft Use. Commercial Use. I 

Aircraft. 

Year, Make and Model 

2004 Cirrus SR 22 

2005 Cin-us SR 20 

2005 Cin-us SR 20 

2005 Diamond DA 40 

2007 Diamond DA 20 

2005 Diamond DA 40 

2006 Diamond DA 20 

2007 DA 42 Twin Star 

2006 Diamond DA 40 

Type 

Land 

Land 

Land 

Land 

Land 

Land 

Land 

Land 

Land 

Airworthiness 

Certificate 

Standard 

Standard 

Standard 

Standard 

Stanjard 

Standard 

Standard 

Standard 

Stan(|lard 

FAA 

Identification 

N154CS 

N184PD 

N491CD 

N388MA 

N383CA 

N496MA 

N478DC 

N571CA 

N662DS 

Paseienger Capacity 

Excluding Crew 

3 

3 

3 

1 

3 

1 

3 

3 

You keep your aircraft principally in the state of New York. 

Pilots: 

With respect to Diamond DA 20, Diamond DA 40, and Cirnjs SR 20: 

Any Pilot approved by the "Policyholder." 

With respect to Certified Flight Instructor's: 

Any Certified Flight Instructor who has been approved by Didier Baco. 

With respect to Cirrus SR 22: 

(Rental) Anv pilot holding an FAA Private Pilot Certificate with FAA Instrument Rating, who has logged a minimum 

of 350 total hours, with 25 hours logged in make and model, and completion of Manufacturer'^ approved Flight 

Training within the last 12 months. 

With respect to Diamond DA 42: 

(Rental) Any pilot holding an FAA Private Pilot Certificate with FAA Multi-Engine and Instrumen'! ratings who has 

logged a minimum of 500 hours as Pilot In Command, 200 hours in Multi-Engine aircraft, and 2i;5 hours logged in 

Diamond DA 42. 

Any graduate of the "Policyholder" school who has 500 hours (otal time, 200 hours in Multi-Engine aircraft and 25 

hours In DA 42 aircraft. 

Whom We'll Pay. Payments for loss covered under "Your Aircraft Physical Damage Coverage' will be made to 

you. 

Page 1 of 2 Pages 

400AC CSP8-0807 (400) 
USAIG All-Clear Policy 

Coverage Summary Page 

Policy No. 400AC'52017 

o/bJInf attThe^^e^SSmente"'' '"'"' ^ "" ^ *^^ '•'"''"' ^^°* " ^^^''- ""^^ '*^'*« '" ^ *^ ^"^^ ^ '>y '^^e P°««y 

Coverage 

Combined Liability Coverage for 

bodily injury and property damage 

Subject to a maximum of 

Personal Injury 

Medical Coverage 

Limits of Coverage 

1,000.000 

100,000 

1,000,000 

100,00 

Each Occun^ncC' 

Each Passenger 

(Part of and not in addition to 

Combined Liability Coverage) 

Each Occurrence and Aggregate 

Each Passenger 

Part of and not in addition to 

Combined LiabilHy Coverage) 

3,000 Each Person 

Aircraft Physical Damage Coverage: 

FAA Identification 

N154CS 

N184PD 

N491CD 

N388MA 

N383CA 

N496MA 

N478DC 

N571CA 

N662DS 

Not ln-Motk)n 

Deductible 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

1,000 

1,000 

1,000 

1,000 

1,000 

1,000 

1,000 

1.000 

1,000 

In-Motion 

Deductible 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2,500 

2,500 

2,500 

2.500 

2,500 

2,500 

2,500 

2,500 

2,500 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

LimLt 

300,000 

240,000 

240.000 

230,000 

163.000 

220,000 

145,000 

550.000 

245.000 

^!^iS!'^^1'iSr^/E::^!^"JTr:S^^fS"''- "'^""•- """•^o': """• 

This policy is written through the Aviation Managers on September 5, 2008. 

Approved by: United States Aviation Underwriters, inc. 

Aviation Managers 

^^' " ' ' ^ 'l ^ 

Page 2 of 2 Pages 

400AC CSP8-0807 

(400) 
EXHIBIT 2 
Allianz® 

OkbdMn 

Policy Number A4GA000433709AM 

AIRCRAFT POLICY DECLARATIONS 

# Issued by Allianz Aviation Managers, LLC 

(the Aviation Manager* hereinafter) 

on behalf of: 

Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company 

2350 Empire Avenue 

BurtNink, CA 91>504-3350 

(hereinafter known as the Company) 

PRODUQER 

NationAir Insurance Agencies 

473 Alport Road 

Butler, PA 16002 

ITER* 1. NAMED NSURED: Empire Flight Academy 

MAILING ADDRESS: Republic Airport 

Route 109, Hangars 

Farmingdale. NY 11735 

ITEM 2. POLICY PERIOD: FROM September 1. 2009 TO September 1,2010 

BOTH AT 12:01 A.M. LOCAL TIM^ AT THE MAILING ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM 1. 

IN RETURN FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE PREMIUM, AND SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS OF THIS POLICY, THE 

COMPANY AGREES WITH THE INSURED TO PROVIDE THE INSURANCE AS STATED IN THIS POLICY. 

ITEM 3. LIMITS OF INSURANCE 

COVERAGE A: BODILY INJURY -

EXCLUDING PASSENGERS 

COVERAGE B: PROPERTY DAMAGE 

COVERAGE C: PASSENGER LIABILITY 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

COVERAGE D: SINGLE LIMIT BODILY INJURY 

AND PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY $ 

INCLUDING PASSENGERS WITH PASSENGER 

LIABILITY LIMITED TO: $ 

COVERAGE E: MEDICAL EXPENSE -

INCLUDING CREW $ 

NotAi)plicable 

Not Applicable 

Not Applicable 

Not Applicable 

NotAJ>plicable 

See Endorsement 21 

See En^orsenDsnt 21 

5,000 

Each Person 

Each Occurrence 

Each Occurrsnce 

Each Passenger 

Each Occurrence 

Each Occurrence 

Each Passenger 

Each Person 

AGCS-AC 1200 (07-06) Page 3 of 3 
ITEM 4. 

Reg. 

fsluisbec 

N154CS 

N184PD 

N491CD 

N496MA 

N3B3CA 

N662DS 

N6059D 

N47BDC 

N106EZ 

N47BMP 

COVERAGES F, 6 or H: 

Makii ^ Model 

Cimis SR-22 

Cirrus SR-20 

Cirrus SR-20 

Diamond DM0 

Dianxmd DA20 

Diamond DA40 

Cessna 172 

Diamond DA20 

Cirrus SR-22 

Cirrus SR-22 

Physical Damage Coverage 

Agreements. Coverage letters 

DESCRIPTION OF AIRCRAFT AND PHYSICAL DAMAGE COVERAGE: 

Year Seats 

Built Crew/Pass. 

2004 Hl3 

2005 1 / 3 

2005 fl / 3 

2005 1 / 3 

2007 1 / 1 

2006 

2006 

1/3 

1/3 

2006 jl/ l 

2006 1 / 3 

2009 1 / 3 

letters mean as defined In Paragraph 3. 

*N/C mean not covered, ^ 

Insured Value 

200,000 

240,000 

240,000 

200,000 

120,000 

225.000 

180,000 

100.000 

400,000 

541,777 

Cov. Nol 

Deductibles 

In- In-Motion/ 

letfv Motlpn Inasstkin 1 

1,000 $ 1,000 

1.000 $ 1,000 

1.000 $ 1,000 

1,000 $ 1,000 

1.000 $ 1,000 

1,000 $ 1,000 

1,000 $ 1,000 

1,000 $ 1,000 

1,000 $ 1,000 

1.000 $ 1.000 

Physical Damage Coverags of the Insuring 

ITEM S. Pilots; When In Flight the aircraft will be operated only by pilots meeting the requirements of this policy. 

ITEM $. The Aircraft will be used only fbrthe purpo8e(s) indlcated|by *X* below (see Definitions) 

n Charter/Air Taxi O Cofflmerelal El Instruction and Rental 

D industrial Aid D Pleasure and Business D Any use required by the Named insured 

D As Endorsed (See Purpose of Use Endorsement) 

ITEM 7. The Named Insured is and shall remain the sole owner of the aircraft and the aircraft is not subject to any 

encumbrance other than as shown In this policy. 

ITEM 8. Premium Policy Premium 

Total 

FORMS AND ENDORSEMENTS A'. .»wncu iw ini» fUUCY AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE 

Endorsements 1-22 

THESE DECLARATIONS, TOGETHER WITH THE AIRCRAFT INSURANCE POLICY AND COVERAGE FORM(S) AND 

ANY ENDORSEMENT(S), COMPLETE THE ABOVE NUMBERED POLICY. 

This policy is written through and approved by the Aviation Manage^ at Chicago, IL on this 1st day of September, 2008. 

By: 

For the Aviation Managers 

(Authorized Representative) 

AGCS-AC 1200 (07-06) Page 4 of 4 
EXHIBIT 3 
FAA Registry - Aircraft - N-Number Results Page 1 of3 

„_—, . ^— ,^..„ 1 — 

FAA REGISjTRY 

N-Number Inquiry Results 

N383CA has Assigned/Multiple Records 

1 

Serial Number 

Manufacturer Name 

Model 

Type Aircraft, 

Pending Number 

Change 

Date Change 

Authorized 

MFR Year 

Name 

Street 

City 

County 

Country 

Aircraft Descr ption 

1 

C0413 Type Registration 

DIAMOND AIRCRAFT IND INC Certificate Issue 

DA 20-C1 Expiration Date 

Fixed Wing Single^Engine Status 

1 

None Type Engine 

None Dealer 

2007 Mode S Code 

Fractional Owner 

Registered 0\vner 

CLYDE AIR LEASING LLC 

117 THE HELM 

1 

EAST ISLIP State 

SUFFOLK Zip Code 

UNITED STATES 

i 

Airworthiness 

Engine Manufacturer CONT MOTOR Classification 

Engine Model IO-240-B Category 

AAV Date 

Corporation 

04/10/2007 

06/30/2011 

Valid 

Reciprocating 

No 

51063242 

NO 

NEW YORK 

11730-2915 

Standard 

Utility 

02/13/2007 

This is the most current Airworthiness Certificate dalja, however, it may not reflect the current 

aircraft configuration. For that information, see the aircraft record. A copy can be obtained at 

Http://aircraft,faa,goy/e.goy/NI5^/adrrecordsN 

http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum Results.asDX?NNumbertxt=383CA&x=2?.A i ononm n 
FAA Registry - Aircraft - N-Number Results Page 2 of3 

None 

Other Owner ^ames 

None 

Temporary Certificate 

None 

Fuel Modifications 

Deregistered Aircraft 1 of 1 

Serial Number 

Manufacturer 

Name 

Model 172F 

Year Manufacturer 1964 

Reason for 

Cancellation 

17252039 

CESSNA 

Destroyed 

Deregistered Aircraft 

Aircraft Description 

Type Registration Co-Owned 

Certificate Issue 08/16/1996 

Date 

Mode S Code 51063242 

Cancel Date 10/01/2002 

Export To None 

Name 

Street 

City 

County 

Country 

Aircraft Registration prior to Deregistration 

ALLEN JAMES T 

2600 SAN EMIDIO ST 

BAKERSFIELD State CALIFORNIA Zip Code 93304-1031 

KERN 

UNITED STATES 

Engine 

Manufacturer 

Engine Model 

Deregistered Airworthiness 

CONT MOTOR Classification 

17022 

Standard 

Category 

A/WDate 

Normal 

Utility 

09/28/1964 

Deregistered Other Owner Names 

http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum Results.aspx?NNumbertxt=383CA&x=22&... 12/^0/?ni n 
FAA Registry - Aircraft - N-Number Results Page 3 of3 

ALLEN CAROL A 

http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/NNum_Results.aspx?NNumbertxt=383CA&x=22&... 12/30/2010 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served by regula^ U.S. mail, postage prepaid, an original and 

one (1) copy of the foregoing Motion for Decision addressed to: 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AOC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building ! 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 j 

I hereby certify that I have this date sent via facsimil^ and first class mail a copy of the foregoing 

Motion for Decision addressed to: 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge j 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

East Building Grotmd Floor, Room El|2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Tel: 202 366-2142 

Fax: 202 366-7536 

Zachary M, Berman, Esq. 

FAA Eastern Region, AEA-7 

1 Aviation Plaza, Room 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Tel: 718 553-3258 

Fax:718 533-5699 

Dated this 3rd day of June 2011. 

Respectfi^llv/^mHnitted, 

G^GORV^. WINTON, ESQ. 

le Aviation Law Firm 

)ne Research Court, Suite 450 

Rockville.MD 20850 

Counsel for Respondent