alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.20


 


Prof. Dr. med. Oliver Wiedow


Forstweg 55


D-24105 Kiel


Germany


Kiel, on February 10th, 2013


Proteo, Inc.


		Att:	Chief Executive Officer



Ms. Birge Bargmann


2102 Business Center Drive


Irvine, CA 92612


USA


 


		Re:	Elafin License Agreement



 


Dear Ms. Bargmann,


 


This is to confirm certain agreements and understandings
reached between me and Proteo, Inc. in December 2012 based on the following background:


 


Pursuant to the provisions of the license agreement
between Proteo, Inc. (hereinafter “Licensee“) and myself (hereinafter “Licensor“, Licensee and Licensor
collectively the “Parties”) dated December 30th, 2000 as amended on December 23rd, 2008 and February
6th, 2012 (hereinafter the “License Agreement“), Licensee promised to pay certain amounts to Licensor. In
December 2007, December 2008 and February 2012, Licensee paid to Licensor 30,000 Euros per year and no other payments were made
under the License Agreement to Licensor as of February 10th, 2013. I herewith confirm that based on the foregoing we
have agreed on the following in December 2012:


 


		1.	The Parties herewith agree that Licensor defers to April 15, 2015 the installment payable by Licensee
in the amount of 330,000 Euros, which otherwise would be due on December 31, 2012 (30,000 €), on April 15, 2013 (60,000 €),
on December 31, 2013 (120,000 €) and on December 31, 2014 (120.000 €) (hereinafter the “Deferral”).



 


		2.	In the event that the Company's financial condition improves, the Parties would endeavor to enter
in good faith negotiations to accelerate the payments.



 


		3.	Neither the Deferral under Section 1 hereof nor the willingness to negotiate accelerated payments
as provided for in Section 2 hereof, would constitute a waiver of or estoppel to Licensor‘s rights to already existing or
future payment obligations under the License Agreement.



 


Please confirm by respective countersignature
that you are in agreement with this letter and with this confirmation of our agreement from December 2012.


 


Kind regards,


/s/ Oliver Wiedow


Prof. Dr. med. Oliver Wiedow


 


We agree to the foregoing


Proteo, Inc., on February 10th,
2013


/s/ Birge Bargmann


Birge Bargmann, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ottawa Savings Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Gary L. OcepekGary L. OcepekPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 12, 2009/s/ Jon L. KranovJon L. KranovSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 12, 2009




29
#### § 1216.104 Subagents.

The referendum agent may appoint any individual or individuals necessary or desirable to assist the agent in performing such agent's functions under this subpart. Each individual so appointed may be authorized by the agent to perform any or all of the functions which, in the absence of such appointment, shall be performed by the agent.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Child Labor Trafficking      

# Resource: Child Labor Trafficking

This literature review (PDF, 13 pages) provides an overview of child labor trafficking, including estimates of rates of trafficking, characteristics of survivors, anti-trafficking legislation, theoretical perspectives, and outcome evidence on prevention, prosecution, and treatment approaches. Released as part of OJJDP’s Model Programs Guide, this review can help policymakers and social service agencies as they respond to child labor trafficking issues and the needs of survivors. 

http://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg/litreviews/child-labor-trafficking.pdf?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1561 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to make improvements to support 

facilities for National Historic Sites operated by the National Park Service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2013 

Mr. GARDNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to make improvements to support facilities for National Historic Sites 

operated by the National Park Service, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENT, OPERATION, AND USE OF SUP4 PORT FACILITIES. 

5 (a) IMPROVEMENT.—The Secretary of the Interior, 

6 acting through the National Park Service, may make im7 provements to a support facility, including a visitor center, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1561 IH

1 for a National Historic Site administered by the National 

2 Park Service if the project— 

3 (1) is conducted within the agency’s existing 

4 budget; 

5 (2) is subject to a 50-percent non-Federal cost 

6 sharing requirement; and 

7 (3) is conducted for a unit of the National Park 

8 System which has authority to establish a support 

9 facility outside the park boundary. 

10 (b) OPERATION AND USE.—The National Park Serv11 ice may operate and use all or part of a support facility, 

12 including a visitor center, for a National Historic Site— 

13 (1) to carry out duties associated with admin14 istering and supporting the National Historic Site; 

15 and 

16 (2) only in situations where there is an agree17 ment between the Secretary of Interior and the com18 missioners of the County or Parish in which the sup19 port facility is located. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFourier functional analysis for unsteady aerodynamic modelingA method based on Fourier analysis is developed to analyze the force and moment data obtained in large amplitude forced oscillation tests at high angles of attack. The aerodynamic models for normal force, lift, drag, and pitching moment coefficients are built up from a set of aerodynamic responses to harmonic motions at different frequencies. Based on the aerodynamic models of harmonic data, the indicial responses are formed. The final expressions for the models involve time integrals of the indicial type advocated by Tobak and Schiff. Results from linear two- and three-dimensional unsteady aerodynamic theories as well as test data for a 70-degree delta wing are used to verify the models. It is shown that the present modeling method is accurate in producing the aerodynamic responses to harmonic motions and the ramp type motions. The model also produces correct trend for a 70-degree delta wing in harmonic motion with different mean angles-of-attack. However, the current model cannot be used to extrapolate data to higher angles-of-attack than that of the harmonic motions which form the aerodynamic model. For linear ramp motions, a special method is used to calculate the corresponding frequency and phase angle at a given time. The calculated results from modeling show a higher lift peak for linear ramp motion than for harmonic ramp motion. The current model also shows reasonably good results for the lift responses at different angles of attack.Document ID19910008751Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLan, C. Edward*(Kansas Univ. Center for Research, Inc. Lawrence, KS, United States)*Chin, Suei*(Kansas Univ. Center for Research, Inc. Lawrence, KS, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1991Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-187964NAS 1.26:187964KU-FRL-872-2Accession Number91N18064Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-1087Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910008751.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephane Solis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of C-Chip Technologies Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 29th day of September, 2003.



| | /s/ Stephane Solis
Stephane Solis
Principal Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------



---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdaptive Strategies for Controls of Flexible ArmsAn adaptive controller for a modern manipulator has been designed based on asymptotical stability via the Lyapunov criterion with the output error between the system and a reference model used as the actuating control signal. Computer simulations were carried out to test the design. The combination of the adaptive controller and a system vibration and mode shape estimator show that the flexible arm should move along a pre-defined trajectory with high-speed motion and fast vibration setting time. An existing computer-controlled prototype two link manipulator, RALF (Robotic Arm, Large Flexible), with a parallel mechanism driven by hydraulic actuators was used to verify the mathematical analysis. The experimental results illustrate that assumed modes found from finite element techniques can be used to derive the equations of motion with acceptable accuracy. The robust adaptive (modal) control is implemented to compensate for unmodelled modes and nonlinearities and is compared with the joint feedback control in additional experiments. Preliminary results show promise for the experimental control algorithm.Document ID19900004467Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeThesis/DissertationAuthorsYuan, Bau-San*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1989Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-185868NAS 1.26:185868Accession Number90N13783Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-623Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004467.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Bekir Sali, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Per *Curiam.*

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment as a waiter, without good cause. Claimant’s assertion that he quit his job because his supervisor suggested, two months before that time, that he do so because the work was too hard for him, would not necessarily have constituted good cause, even had the board credited it. *(Matter of Le Roy*[Catherwood], 26 A D 2d 976; *Matter of Jacobson*[Catherwood], 20 A D 2d 733.) In any event, claimant testified, “They didn’t fire me. I quit myself.” When he left, he gave no reason and merely asked for his vacation pay. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum *Per Guriam.*
§ 1221.100 Establishment and representation. There is hereby established a Sorghum Promotion, Research, and Information Board, hereinafter called the Board. Representation includes, but is not limited to, fixed State seats determined by total production with at-large seats to allow representation from a broad geographical area. The Board shall initially be composed of 13 representatives, with the maximum number of producers from one State limited to 6, appointed by the Secretary from nominations as follows: ( a ) The largest production State based on total production shall have 5 sorghum producers to serve as representatives.
( b ) The second largest production State based on total production shall have 3 sorghum producers to serve as representatives.
( c ) The third largest production State based on total production shall have one sorghum producer to serve as a representative.
( d ) There shall be 4 sorghum producers to serve as at-large national representatives with at least two representatives appointed from States not described in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section.
( e ) If the value of assessments on imported sorghum reaches or exceeds the production of the third largest sorghum production State, there shall be one importer to serve as a representative plus an additional at-large national representative, with the maximum number of producers from one State being increased from six to seven.
( f ) At least once every 5 years, the Board will review the geographical distribution of production of sorghum in the United States, the production of sorghum in the United States, and the value of assessments on sorghum imported into the United States. The review will be based on Board assessment records and statistics from the USDA. If warranted, the Board may recommend to the Secretary that representation on the Board be altered to reflect any changes in geographical distribution of domestic sorghum production. If, in the review, the Board determines that the value of assessments on sorghum imported into the United States exceeds 15 percent of the production of sorghum, the Board shall recommend to the Secretary that the nomination procedures and appointments to the Board be altered as necessary or appropriate to facilitate the equitable representation of importers on the Board.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 215 (Monday, November 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68605-68606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28163]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1720]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 125 Under Alternative Site 
Framework; South Bend, Indiana

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) in 
December 2008 (74 FR 1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/09) 
as an option for the establishment or reorganization of general-purpose 
zones;
    Whereas, the St. Joseph County Airport Authority, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 125, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ 
Docket

[[Page 68606]]

29-2010, filed 4/29/2010) for authority to reorganize under the ASF 
with a service area of St. Joseph, Elkhart, Kosciusko, Marshall, 
LaPorte and Starke Counties, Indiana, adjacent to the Chicago Customs 
and Border Protection port of entry, and FTZ 125's existing Sites 1 and 
2 would be categorized as magnet sites;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (75 FR 25204, 5/7/2010) and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 125 under the alternative site 
framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 2,000-
acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone project, and 
to a five-year ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would 
terminate authority for Site 1 if not activated by November 30, 2015.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of October 2010.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-28163 Filed 11-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00263

- CR

TRENTON EUGENE SINYA RD

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 40346CR

REINSTATE MENT ORDER

This appeal was abated to the trial court on October 24, 2018 because no brief had

been filed for appellant. Appellant’s brief was received by t he Court on November 2,

2018.

Accordingly, this appeal is reinstated. Appellant’s brief is filed as of the date it

was received. Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief, also filed

on November 2, 2018, is dismissed as moot.

T he State’s brief in this appeal is due 30 days from the date of this Order.

PER CURIAMSinyard v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal reinstated

Motion dismissed

Order issued and filed November 14 , 2018