alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Stability of Mental Disorder Prevalence Estimates Among School-aged Children and Adolescents: Findings from the Community-based Project to Learn about Youth      

# Resource: Stability of Mental Disorder Prevalence Estimates Among School-aged Children and Adolescents: Findings from the Community-based Project to Learn about Youth

This study examined whether the proportion of children and adolescents who are at risk for mental disorders is similar over time. Findings can be used for community-level planning to support the mental health of children and adolescents and provide prevention and intervention services when needed. **Learn more.**
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1296 

To amend the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to ensure workplace choice and 

opportunity for young adults with disabilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2023 

Mr. GROTHMAN (for himself and Mrs. MILLER of Illinois) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to ensure workplace choice and opportunity for young adults with disabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoration of Employ5 ment Choice for Adults with Disabilities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF SUBMINIMUM WAGE. 

7 Section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 

8 U.S.C. 794g) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1296 IH

1 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph 

2 (1)— 

3 (i) by striking ‘‘No’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘Any’’; 

5 (ii) by striking ‘‘24 or younger’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘18 or older’’; and 

7 (iii) by striking ‘‘unless’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘if’’; and 

9 (B) by inserting at the end the following 

10 new paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(3) The individual chooses to accept employ12 ment with such entity.’’; 

13 (2) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ‘‘24’’ and 

14 inserting ‘‘17’’; 

15 (3) in subsection (c), by inserting at the end 

16 the following new paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(4) OTHER EXCEPTIONS.—The entity de18 scribed in subsection (a) can satisfy the require19 ments of paragraph (1)(A) with respect to an indi20 vidual, if— 

21 ‘‘(A) such entity makes documented ef22 forts, at the intervals described in paragraph 

23 (2), to contact on behalf of the individual, the 

24 designated State unit for the counseling, inforVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:36 Mar 16, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1296.IH H1296

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1296 IH

1 mation, and referrals described in paragraph 

2 (1)(A); and 

3 ‘‘(B) such designated State unit fails to 

4 provide the relevant counseling, information, 

5 and referrals.’’; and 

6 (4) in subsection (d)(1), by inserting before the 

7 period at the end the following: ‘‘and, if such indi8 vidual is employed by an entity described in sub9 section (a) at the time such documentation is made 

10 pursuant to such process, to make available copies 

11 of such documentation to the entity’’. 

12 SEC. 3. APPLICATION. 

13 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

14 respect to the employment of an individual on or after 

15 March 13, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Enrico Varano, Respondent, v. Cam Construction Co., Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 9, 1966, affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J., dis*564sents and votes to reverse the judgment insofar as appealed from and to grant a new trial as against appellant, with the following memorandum: In my opinion, the present record discloses that plaintiff failed to prove, by a fair preponderance of the circumstantial evidence adduced, the theory of liability upon which this action was tried and submitted to the jury. The appellant’s employees (bricklayers) finished their work and left the premises at least 3 or 4 days prior to the accident and the jury’s implicit finding that the brick which struck the plaintiff was left by appellant’s employees could only be based upon the impermissible rationalization of inference upon inference *(McCabe*v. *Queensboro Farm Prods.,*21 A D 2d 675).
#### Auburn Chicago Company, appellee, v. Merchants & Manufacturers Securities Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,549.

Opinion filed January 2, 1930.

Rehearing denied January 15, 1930.

Walter A. Myer and Philip D. Hoffman, for appellant. Pruitt & Grealis, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice

Wilson delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1561 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1561

  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to make improvements to 
support facilities for National Historic Sites operated by the National 
                 Park Service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2013

 Mr. Gardner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to make improvements to 
support facilities for National Historic Sites operated by the National 
                 Park Service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENT, OPERATION, AND USE OF SUPPORT FACILITIES.

    (a) Improvement.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
National Park Service, may make improvements to a support facility, 
including a visitor center, for a National Historic Site administered 
by the National Park Service if the project--
            (1) is conducted within the agency's existing budget;
            (2) is subject to a 50-percent non-Federal cost sharing 
        requirement; and
            (3) is conducted for a unit of the National Park System 
        which has authority to establish a support facility outside the 
        park boundary.
    (b) Operation and Use.--The National Park Service may operate and 
use all or part of a support facility, including a visitor center, for 
a National Historic Site--
            (1) to carry out duties associated with administering and 
        supporting the National Historic Site; and
            (2) only in situations where there is an agreement between 
        the Secretary of Interior and the commissioners of the County 
        or Parish in which the support facility is located.
                                 <all>
```
#### Charles A Dawell, appellant, v. Union Trust Company, appellee.

Gen. No. 33,410.

Opinion filed December 31, 1929.

Rehearing denied January 10, 1930.

Norman A. Beck and Otto *G.*Ryden, for appellant. Gann, Secord & Stead, for appellee; Guy Van Sehaick, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 10.3

 

Sonus Networks, Inc.

4 Technology Park Drive

Westford, MA  01886

 

March 25, 2013

 

Mr. Maurice Castonguay

By electronic delivery

 

Dear Moe:

 

Based on your desire to demonstrate your support for Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) and its prospects, the Compensation Committee has considered and will agree to your request to forgo the payment of your cash bonus for 2013 and, if any such bonus would have been earned, to instead accept a grant of shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

The August 24, 2011 employment agreement, as amended (your “Agreement”), outlining the terms and conditions of your employment by the Company is hereby amended as follows:

 

1.                                      You have elected to receive your fiscal year 2013 bonus (“2013 Bonus”), if any is earned, in the form of shares of the Company’s common stock (“2013 Bonus Shares”), which will be granted and have the terms described below:

 

a.              The number of 2013 Bonus Shares granted will equal 1.5 times your actual 2013 Bonus earned, which bonus shall be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion subject to the terms of the 2013 bonus program, divided by the closing price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant.

 

b.              The 2013 Bonus Shares will be granted and vest in full on the grant date, which shall be concurrent with the timing of normal 2013 bonus payouts.

 

Notwithstanding any provisions in your employment agreement, as amended, you must remain an employee of the Company on the grant date in order to receive the 2013 Bonus Shares (if earned).  The parties hereby acknowledge that the Compensation Committee retains the right, in its sole discretion, to pay your 2013 Bonus in cash pursuant to the terms of your Agreement as opposed to payment in 2013 Bonus Shares; provided that, if the Company is the subject of an acquisition or change of control prior to the grant date, if the Compensation Committee of the Company (or its successor) elects to pay the 2013 Bonus, if any, in cash, such cash payment will equal 1.5 times your actual 2013 Bonus earned, if any.

 

Except as modified by the terms of this letter agreement, the terms of you employment, including without limitation, the terms reflected in the Agreement and all Company plans, programs and policies, will remain unaltered and in full force and effect.  Capitalized terms not defined in this letter have the same definitions given to them in the Agreement.

 

Very truly yours,

 

	
/s/   Raymond P. Dolan
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Raymond   P. Dolan
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
President   and Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
ACCEPTED:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 /s/ Maurice Castonguay
    	
 
    	
03/28/2013
    	
 
    
	
Maurice   Castonguay
    	
 
    	
Date
#### § 1250.514 Levy of assessments.

An assessment rate of 10 cents per case of commercial eggs is levied on each case of commercial eggs handled for the account of each producer. Each case of commercial eggs shall be subject to assessment only once. Producers meeting the requirements of § 1250.348 are exempt from the provisions of the Act including this section.

[55 FR 6974, Feb. 28, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 64560, Dec. 15, 1994]
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1437.305 Ornamental nursery. ( a ) Eligible ornamental nursery stock is a value loss crop and is compensable only in accord with restrictions set out in this section. Eligible ornamental nursery stock is limited to field-grown and containerized decorative plants grown in a controlled environment for commercial sale.
( b ) The property upon which the nursery stock is located must be owned or leased by the producer.
( c ) The eligible nursery stock must be placed in the ornamental nursery facility and not be indigenous to the facility.
( d ) The facility must be managed and cared for using good nursery growing practices for the geographical region. At a minimum producers must provide a controlled environment and ensure adequate and proper flood prevention, growing medium, fertilization, irrigation, insect and disease control, weed control, rodent and wildlife control, and over-winterization storage facilities.
( e ) An ornamental plant having any value as an ornamental plant, or a damaged ornamental plant that may rejuvenate and re-establish value as an ornamental plant, will be considered as worth full value based on the age or size of the plant at the time of disaster.
( f ) In the crop year in which a notice of loss is filed, producers may be required, at the discretion of FSA, to provide evidence the ornamental nursery is maintained in accordance with this section.
( g ) For the 2010 and subsequent crops, the crop year for ornamental nursery is June 1 through May 31.
[67 FR 12448, Mar. 19, 2002, as amended at 78 FR 21019, Apr. 9, 2013; 79 FR 74582, 74583, Dec. 15, 2014]
§ 1005.71 Payments to the producer-settlement fund. Each handler shall make a payment to the producer-settlement fund in a manner that provides receipt of the funds by the market administrator no later than the 12th day after the end of the month (except as provided in § 1000.90). Payment shall be the amount, if any, by which the amount specified in paragraph (a) of this section exceeds the amount specified in paragraph (b) of this section: ( a ) The total value of milk of the handler for the month as determined pursuant to § 1005.60; and
( b ) The sum of the value at the uniform prices for skim milk and butterfat, adjusted for plant location, of the handler's receipts of producer milk; and the value at the uniform price, as adjusted pursuant to § 1005.75, applicable at the location of the plant from which received of other source milk for which a value is computed pursuant to § 1005.60(e).
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

W ASIDNGTON, DC 

SPA RENTAL, LLC, d/b/a/ MSI AVIATION, 

Complainant, 

v. 

SOMERSET- PULASKI COUNTY AIRPORT 

BOARD, 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. 16-13-02 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport 

Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date 

by which the Director's Detennination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to 

August 28, 2015. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

Randall S. Fiertz 

Director, Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 29, 2015, I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (fust class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension ofTime to 

August 28, 2015 for FAA Docket No. 16-13-02 addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Konrad Kuczak 

130 West Second Street, Suite 1010 

Dayton, OH 45402 

Counsel for Respondent: 

Rachel Owsley 

Bethany A. Breetz 

Stites & Harbison, PLLC 

400 West Market Street, Suite 1800 

Louisville, KY 40202 

Hand delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStructural behavior of composites with progressive fractureStructural characteristics such as natural frequencies and buckling loads with corresponding mode shapes were investigated during progressive fracture of multilayer, angle-plied polymer matrix composites. A computer program was used to generate the numerical results for overall mechanical response of damaged composites. Variations in structural characteristics as a function of the previously applied loading were studied. Results indicate that most of the overall structural properties were preserved throughout a significant proportion of the ultimate fracture load. For the cases studied, changes in structural behavior began to occur after 70 percent of the ultimate fracture load was applied. However, the individual nature of the structural change was rather varied depending on the laminate configuration, fiber orientation, and the boundary conditions.Document ID19900014161Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMinnetyan, Levon*(Clarkson Univ. Potsdam, NY., United States)*Chamis, Christos C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Murthy, Pappu L. N.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102370NASA-TM-102370E-5089Accession Number90N23477Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014161.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Protecting Access to Education for Unaccompanied Children      

# Resource: Protecting Access to Education for Unaccompanied Children

This fact sheet (PDF, 3 pages) highlights specific access to education challenges faced by unaccompanied children. This fact sheet explains where individuals caring for unaccompanied children can go for help and outlines public schools’ responsibilities to serve unaccompanied children under Federal civil rights laws. **Learn more** (PDF, 3 pages).
#### § 1.196 Reply.

Within 15 days after service of an answer, the applicant may file a reply. If the reply is based on any alleged facts not already in the record of the proceeding, the applicant shall include with the reply either supporting affidavits or a request for further proceedings under § 1.199 of this part.
Exhibit 10.10


 


BioRestorative Therapies, Inc.


555 Heritage Drive, Suite 130


Jupiter, Florida 33458


 


April 18, 2012


 


TDA Consulting Services, Inc.


200 Glades Road


Boca Raton, Florida 33432


Attention: Todd Adler, President


 


Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to
the Consulting Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2011, between BioRestorative Therapies, Inc. (formerly Stem Cell Assurance,
Inc.) (the “Company”) and TDA Consulting Services, Inc. (the “Consultant”) (the “Consulting Agreement”).


 


The parties hereby agree
that the term of the Consulting Agreement is extended for an additional period of nine (9) months until December 31, 2012 and that,
during such additional nine (9) month period, the Consultant shall be entitled to a fee of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per month
(an aggregate of $90,000) payable in advance on the first day of each month commencing as of April 1, 2012 and through December
1, 2012. As additional compensation for the Services (as defined in the Consulting Agreement), (a) the Consultant shall be entitled
to a bonus of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000), payable to the extent of fifty percent (50%) thereof on August 31, 2012 and fifty
percent (50%) thereof on December 31, 2012, and (b) concurrently with the execution of this letter, the Consultant is being granted
a warrant for the purchase of fifteen million (15,000,000) shares of the Company’s common stock, $.001 par value, which warrant
shall be exercisable during the period commencing on January 1, 2013 and terminating on the fifth anniversary of the date hereof,
at an exercise price of three cents ($.03) per share.


 


Except as amended hereby,
the Consulting Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	BIORESTORATIVE THERAPIES, INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/	 
	 	 	Mark Weinreb
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer


 





	Agreed:	 
	 	 
	TDA CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/	 	 
	 	Todd Adler	 
	 	President