alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1200.3 Proposals. ( a ) An order may be proposed by any organization certified pursuant to the Act or any interested person affected by the Act, including the Secretary. Any person or organization other than the Secretary proposing an order shall file with the Administrator a written application, together with a copy of the proposal, requesting the Secretary to hold a hearing upon the proposal. Upon receipt of such proposal, the Administrator shall cause such investigation to be made and such consideration to be given as, in the Administrator's opinion, are warranted. If the investigation and consideration lead the Administrator to conclude that the proposed order will not tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act, or that for other proper reasons a hearing should not be held on the proposal, the Administrator shall deny the application, and promptly notify the applicant of such denial, which notice shall be accompanied by a brief statement of the grounds for the denial.
( b ) If the investigation and consideration lead the Administrator to conclude that the proposed order will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act, or if the Secretary desires to propose an order, the Administrator shall sign and cause to be served a notice of hearing, as provided herein.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: School Experiences with COVID-19      

# Resource: School Experiences with COVID-19

The latest round of findings from the School Pulse Panel (SPP) is now available. These SPP data examine parental, staff, and student concerns for the 2021-2022 school year, the state of school food and nutrition programs, learning modes offered by schools, and COVID-19 mitigation strategies, including quarantine and masking.**Learn more.**
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           2012 School Health Profiles      

# 2012 School Health Profiles

The  2012 School Health Profiles include information gathered through surveys conducted in 45 states, 16 large urban school districts, four territories, and two tribal governments on multiple measures related to school health. The report includes background information on the Profiles, a fact sheet on key 2012 results, and a fact sheet on each state, school district, territory, and tribal government on obesity, sexual risk behaviors, and tobacco use. 

http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/profiles/index.htm
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSTIN**

orhla agents shall oonforato the meuorable regulatioruVhiOh rrald O@nwleaiQn*rof Agrloulturt9 la herebj authoxrised and dted to ~rescrPOte, ar 8hrr;ll @anfarm to the re8wm8ble msgulatiormof method of teetlng adopted 02 used bg tbo Amoaiatlon of OJtiloLal Seed Analtyets at Ioath kbwrlcia.*pspsrtment of Agriculture,Page 2

It Is 0bvIous that the CommIsaIonerof Agr1oulture mt, under this **statute, lni**  **’ orm**  hlmself from tIge to time of the natuW **of** the regulationsor pethods of testingadopted e tmed by the Associationof OffIoIal Seed Analysts of~Rorth mriea. The LegIslattar% must neoessarlly

have aontemplated that the department should be permItted to Inour euch expendi**t\rros aa**  **tuI@t be**  **neaeesa~y to**  **obtain thllr**  **InfomDItIon, and**  m therefore

hold that your departmentrry Incur, and the corrptr~ller

may Isaue a warrant for the expense In the sum of $10.00Involved In subsorlbIngfor the **servloe,** rhiah Imludes oopIeaof internatlozul seed testing Litereture,fuxmlshedby t&lAseocIatIonof OfmsIal seed Analyat4B.

Authority of other **depU%mmts** of the State governmnt w Inour and pdy cberges for similar servlaes has been **sustaIned** by #Is departmnt In ita~ opinlonmnumbered O-1903 and O-1990.

**Yours very**  **truly** ATTORlBYBEXRRALOF~

**COMMll-, ‘**  **EC**
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1412.49 Matters of general applicability. ( a ) The regulations in this part and FSA and CCC's interpretation of the regulations in this part and internal agency directives issued to FSA State and county offices are matters of general applicability and are not individually appealable in administrative appeals according to §§ 11.3 and 780.5 of this title. Additionally, the regulations in this part and any decisions of CCC and FSA that are not based on specific facts derived from an individual participant's application, contract, or file are not appealable under part 11 or part 780 of this title. Examples of such decisions include how the program is generally administered, signup deadlines, payment rates, or any other generally applicable matter or determination that is made by CCC or FSA for use in all similarly situated applications. The only extent by which the matters referenced in this section are reviewable administratively in an appeal forum is whether FSA's or CCC's decision to apply the generally applicable matter is factually accurate and in conformance with the regulations in this part.
( b ) The relief provisions of 7 CFR part 718 are applicable only to ineligibility and noncompliance decisions. The relief provisions cannot be used to extend a benefit or assistance not otherwise available under law or not otherwise available to others who have satisfied or complied with every eligibility or compliance requirement of the provisions of this part. Equitable relief provisions of part 718 of this title cannot be used to obtain a review of either these regulations, the requirements of this part, the agency's interpretations of this part, or compliance provisions of this part.
[79 FR 46339, Aug. 8, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 45893, Sept. 3, 2019]
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1416.407 Obligations of a participant. ( a ) Eligible orchardists and nursery tree growers must execute all required documents and complete the TAP-funded practice within 12 months of application approval.
( b ) Eligible orchardist or nursery tree growers must allow representatives of FSA to visit the site for the purposes of certifying compliance with TAP requirements.
( c ) Producers who do not meet all applicable requirements and obligations will not be eligible for payment.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7354

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LUTHER T. GOLDSMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (CR-01-29)

Submitted: February 8, 2006 Decided: February 27, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luther T. Goldsmith, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*Goldsmith asserted in his notice of appeal that he did not

receive the district court’s order until thirty days after it was

entered.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Luther Thomas Goldsmith seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582 (2000). In criminal cases, the defendant must file

his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment.

Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A); United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309,

310 (5th Cir. 2000) (holding § 3582 proceeding is criminal in

nature and ten-day appeal period applies and collecting cases). In

criminal appeals, the district court may extend the time in which

to note an appeal up to thirty days upon a finding of excusable

neglect or good cause, with or without a motion or notice. Fed. R.

App. P. 4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th

Cir. 1985).

The district court entered its order on its docket on

July 18, 2005, and the ten-day appeal period expired on August 1,

2005. Goldsmith filed his notice of appeal after the ten-day

appeal period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect

period. Because Goldsmith’s notice of appeal was filed within the

excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court

for that court to determine whether Goldsmith has shown excusable

neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal

period.* The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to
- 3 -

this court for further consideration. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

REMANDED
§ 1223.43 Vacancies. ( a ) In the event that any member of the Board ceases to work for or be affiliated with the category of members from which the member was appointed to the Board, such position shall automatically become vacant.
( b ) If a member of the Board consistently refuses to perform the duties of a member of the Board, or if a member of the Board engages in acts of dishonesty or willful misconduct, the Board may recommend to the Secretary that the member be removed from office. If the Secretary finds the recommendation of the Board shows adequate cause, the Secretary shall remove such member from office.
( c ) Without recommendation of the Board, a member may be removed by the Secretary upon showing of adequate cause, including the continued failure by a member to submit reports or remit assessments required under this part, if the Secretary determines that such member's continued service would be detrimental to the achievement of the purposes of the Act.
( d ) Should the position of a member become vacant, successors for the unexpired terms of such member shall be appointed in the manner specified in §§ 1223.40 and 1223.41, except that said nomination and replacement shall not be required if said unexpired terms are less than six months.
NUMBER 13-08-00332-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MAJOR CARVEL BALDWIN, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 36th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Major Carvel Baldwin, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,
2

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this 11th day of June, 2009.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000871 15-FEB-2019 07:45 AM
§ 1260.164 Procedure. ( a ) Attendance of at least 15 members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum at a properly convened meeting of the Committee. Any action of the Committee shall require the concurring votes of at least two-thirds of the members present. The Committee shall establish rules concerning timely notice of meetings.
( b ) When in the opinion of the chairperson of the Committee emergency action must be taken before a meeting can be called, the Committee may take action upon the concurring votes of no less than two-thirds of its members by mail, telephone, or telegraph. Action taken by this emergency procedure is valid only if all members are notified and provided the opportunity to vote and any telephone vote is confirmed promptly in writing. Any action so taken shall have the same force and effect as though such action had been taken at a properly convened meeting of the Committee.
**U.S. EPA Background Ozone Workshop Agenda**  **February 24 and 25, 2016 Phoenix, Arizona** 

9:00 - 9:15 Welcome and Introductions 9:15 - 10:00 Overview and Key Questions 10:00 - 11:00 Background Ozone Estimates 11:00 - 11:15 MORNING BREAK 11:15 - 12:00 Exceptional Events Considerations 12:00 - 1:15 LUNCH BREAK 1:15 - 2:00 Nonattainment Area Boundaries and Rural Transport Areas 2:00 - 2:30 International Transport (CAA 179B) 2:30 - 2:45 AFTERNOON BREAK 2:45 - 4:15 Roundtable/Open Mic/Synthesis 4:15 - 4:30 Summary/Adjourn NOTE: The agenda will be the same for both days. February 24 is for air agencies and February 25 is for all stakeholders. ( You must represent a state, local or tribal air agency to participate in the February 24 workshop session. ) For more information contact Yvonne W. Johnson, 919 -541-3921, johnson.yvonnew@epa.gov
###### Editorial Note on Part 1218

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1218 appear at 66 FR 37118, 37119, July 17, 2001, and 71 FR 77245, Dec. 26, 2006.

#### § 1218.16 Producer.

*Producer* means any person who grows blueberries in the United States for sale in commerce, or a person who is engaged in the business of producing, or causing to be produced for any market, blueberries beyond the person's own family use and having value at first point of sale.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1463.109 Contracts. ( a ) CCC will enter into a contract with eligible tobacco quota holders and producers. To the extent a person has filed such a contract with CCC, but a final administrative decision has not been made with respect to such person's status as an eligible quota holder or tobacco producer prior to the final enrollment date, CCC will enter into such a contract only upon the issuance of a final determination of eligibility and the passing of any deadline for any administrative appeal under parts 780 and 11 of this title.
( b ) ( 1 ) If contracts or other written claims are provided to CCC by June 3, 2005, by two or more persons with respect to the same tobacco BQL used to calculate a program payment, CCC will not issue such payment until CCC has determined the eligibility status of each claimant.
( 2 ) If CCC has made a payment to a person after June 3, 2005, a person who is not an eligible holder or producer, as identified on FSA records, for such farm, or claims to be an eligible tobacco holder or producer and submits a contract or other written claim with CCC for the same quota used to issue the initial payment, CCC will issue no further payments for such farm until CCC has determined the eligibility status of each person who has submitted a contract or other written claim for such farm and the occurrence of the repayment of the initial payment made by CCC.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BENJAMIN CROWLEY, DOC #R29941, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3077

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed February 9, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

BLACK, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of

the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders

and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions

of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 7/2/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

DONALD EDWARD BREEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF OKLAHOMA; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

OKLAHOMA,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 95-5280

(D. Ct. No. CV-95-414-B)

(N. D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, BALDOCK, and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This pro se appeal is from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus by the

district court. Petitioner appeals on the ground that the district court erred in failing to
- 2 -

find violations of the constitution or a federal law in the allegations related to the

circumstances surrounding petitioner’s guilty plea. 

All of petitioner’s allegations relate to alleged failures on the part of the sentencing

court to fully inform petitioner’s of possible collateral consequences to his guilty plea in

the event that he might at some time in the future commit another crime. We are required

to examine the appeal of a denial of a writ of habeas corpus to determine whether the

petitioner has sufficiently alleged a denial of a federal constitutional right. AntiTerrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c). We have examined and construed liberally the pleadings in this case and have

determined that the allegations in the original petition and those raised on appeal are not

sufficient to allege a denial of any federal constitutional right. Lennox v. Evans, No. 96-

6041, 1996 WL 343632 (10th Cir. 1996). We therefore decline to issue a certificate of

appealability. Appeal DISMISSED. 

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Deanell Reece Tacha

Circuit Judge
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           U.S. Department of Education Disperses Funds to Support Parents of Children with Disabilities      

# U.S. Department of Education Disperses Funds to Support Parents of Children with Disabilities

ED announced an additional $2.5 million investment to centers that serve a critical role for parents and families of students with disabilities across the nation. These supplemental grants to Parent Training and Information Centers (PTIs) ensure that all parents and families of children with disabilities, particularly underserved parents and parents of children who may be inappropriately identified, have the information and training they need to participate effectively in helping their children and navigating the special education system.  

Two additional grants have been awarded to new Community Parent Resource Centers (CPRCs) in Arkansas and New York.**Learn more.**