alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1437.502 Coverage periods and fees for covered tropical crops. ( a ) The crop year for all covered tropical crops is the calendar year (January 1 through December 31).
( b ) The application closing date for all covered tropical crops is December 31 of the calendar year before the applicable crop year.
( c ) For covered tropical crops, the maximum service fee per crop per county provided at § 1437.7 is required of the producer for coverage of: ( 1 ) With respect to annual and biennial crops, all plantings of the same crop planted during the crop year, as determined by FSA.
( 2 ) With respect to perennial crops, all acreage of the crop existing during the crop year, as determined by FSA.
( d ) Multiple planting periods and final planting dates are not applicable for covered tropical crops. However, nothing in this section will be interpreted to prohibit assigning different production expectations to different fields.
( e ) The coverage period for perennial and other crops covered by this subpart begins on January 1 of the relevant crop year and ends on December 31 of that year.
[71 FR 52739, Sept. 7, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 21019, Apr. 9, 2013; 79 FR 74583, Dec. 15, 2014; 85 FR 12221, Mar. 2, 2020]
#### *Gayle vs. Overton.*

Forcicle entry.

Case 145,

Error to the Franklin Circuit; Henry David ce, Judge.

*Forcible entry. Warrant. Inquisition. Traverse. Judgment. Restitution.*

June 16.

Warrant charges forcible ‘•entry.’» Inquisition

Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Overton issued a warrant against Gayle, for a *“forcible entry.”*The jury found Gayle guilty 01 ‘^the forcible *detainer*complained of in the warrant.”

*550finds forcible “detainer.” Error to reneer judgment for restitution

*Depew,*for plaintiff; Triplett, for defendant.

On a traverse of the inquisition, in the circuit court, a jury returned the following verdict: “we of the jury, find the inquisition true.” The court having rendered judgment of restitution, the traverser has prosecuted his writ of error, to reverse the judgment.

A traverse waives all objections to form, in the warrant. But the warrant is the basis of the judgment of restitution. There can be no valid judgment, for any thing not charged in the warrant. The inquest in this case, does not correspond with the warrant. It finds the defendant in (he warrant, guilty of that with which the plaintiff had not charged him. I( is, therefore, not responsive to the issue, which the jury was sworn to try, and must be considered a nudity. The justice ■was not authorized to renders judgment of restitution upon it; consequently, the circuit court could not do it. There has been no decision of this court, directly ou this point. But it seems to us to be self evident, on principle, that a court cannot give judgment for that which is not demanded. Whether the inquisition be literally true or false, is immaterial, if it finds a fact notin issue. There must be a warrant; it must specify the cause of complaint; consequently no other cause can be inquired into.

As, therefore, the warrant charged tfa *forcible entry,n*and the jury found a *‘forcible*detainer,” the inquisition ought, to have been quashed, and the court erred in entering judgment for restitution.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
§ 1215.62 Confidential treatment. ( a ) All information obtained from books, records, or reports under the Act, this subpart, and the rule and regulations issued thereunder shall be kept confidential by all persons, including all employees, agents, and former employees and agents of the Board; all officers, employees, agents, and former officers, employees, and agents of the Department; and all officers, employees, agents, and former officers, employees, and agents of contracting and subcontracting agencies or agreeing parties having access to such information. Such information shall not be available to Board members or processors. Only those persons having a specific need for such information to administer effectively the provisions of this part shall have access to such information. Only such information so obtained as the Secretary deems relevant shall be disclosed by them, and then only in a suit or administrative hearing brought at the direction, or on the request, of the Secretary, or to which the Secretary or any officer of the United States is a party, and involving this part.
( b ) No information obtained under the authority of this part may be made available to any agency or officer of the Federal Government for any purpose other than the implementation of the Act and any investigatory or enforcement action necessary for the implementation of the Act.
( c ) Nothing in paragraph (a) of this section may be deemed to prohibit: ( 1 ) The issuance of general statements based upon the reports of the number of persons subject to this part or statistical data collected therefrom, which statements do not identify the information furnished by any person;
( 2 ) The publication, by direction of the Secretary, of the name of any person who has violated this part, together with a statement of the particular provisions of this part violated by such person.
( d ) Any person who knowingly violated the provisions of this section, on conviction, shall be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 or to imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both, or if the person is an officer, employee, or agent of the Board or the Department, that person shall be removed from office or terminated from employment as applicable.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 1023** 

TAWANDA BLAIR, on behalf of LJB , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appe al from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson
. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 8:11

- cv - 01416

- RMG )

Submitted : April 23, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tawanda Blair, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Alexess D. Rea, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee.
Unpublish ed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tawanda Blair appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing this action for want of jurisdiction . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for th e reasons stated by the district court. Blair v. Co mmissioner , No. 8:11

- cv - 01416

- RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 28, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument wo uld not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           A Parent's Guide to Internet Safety      

# A Parent's Guide to Internet Safety

The U.S. Department of Justice's Federal Bureau of Investigation has created a pamphlet, which is designed to help parents, teachers, and providers begin to understand the complexities of on-line child exploitation.

http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/parent-guide/parent-guide
#### § 1280.606 Farm Service Agency County Committee.

*Farm Service Agency County Committee* , also referred to as “FSA County Committee or COC,” means the group of persons within a county who are elected to act as the Farm Service Agency County Committee.
Order entered November 19, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01409
- CV
IN RE EQUIMARK REALTY CORP ORATION, Relator Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 15
- 11921



### O RDER Before Justices Francis, Myers and Schenck Before the Court is relator’s emergency motion for stay, in which the relator requests a stay of all proceedings in the trial court between relator and real party in interest, One Hillcres t Partners, Ltd. We GRANT the motion only to the extent that we ORDER STAYED , until further order of this Court, the trial court’s October 28, 2015 order permitting the deposition requested by One Hillcrest Partners and ordering the production of document s responsive to the subpoena duces tecum issued in conjunction with the deposition notice. Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before the Court. The Court requests that real party in interest and respondent file their responses, if a ny, to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before December 1, 2015.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1429.108 Calculation of individual payments. ( a ) Producers will be eligible for payment for both fresh and processed asparagus. CCC will calculate the payment quantity of 2003 fresh and processed asparagus for an asparagus farm operation based on the lower of: ( 1 ) Reported production reflected on the application, or
( 2 ) If applicable, determined production.
( b ) The payment quantity will be multiplied by the following: ( 1 ) Each asparagus producer's share, and
( 2 ) The payment rate for the fresh or processed asparagus determined as specified in § 1429.107.
( c ) If the total value of payments claimed exceeds the available funding, payments to producers are subject to a $100,000 cap per each of the two program marketing categories (fresh and processed) per asparagus producer as defined in this part, not per “person” or “legal entity” as those terms might be defined in part 1400 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Stanley H. Roe, Appellant, v Camilla Palmer et al., Respondents.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at a Trial Term, entered December 11, 1979 in Madison County, which denied petitioner’s application in a proceeding pursuant to section 16-106 of the Election Law, to declare valid two uncanvassed affidavit emergency ballots cast in the Third Election District of the Town of Hamilton in the general election held November 6, 1979, for the office of Town Supervisor of the Town of Hamilton. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Vehicle Safety Resources      

# Vehicle Safety Resources

The Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration features information on its Parent Central website to help parents keep kids safe while they are on the road. 

http://www.safercar.gov/parents/index.htm
#### § 1222.15 Order.

*Order* means an order issued by the Secretary under section 514 of the Act that provides for a program of generic promotion, research, and information regarding agricultural commodities authorized under the Act.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In re Two Thousand Nine * Original Mandamus Proceeding

Hundred and Eleven Dollars

and Twenty Five Cents U.S.

Currency and Jerry Dewitt Smith,

No. 11

- 14

- 00331

- CV * February 19, 2015

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Ba iley, J. )

This court has considered R elator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

concludes that the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied . Therefore, in

accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied

.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Rural HIV/AIDS Prevention and Treatment Toolkit      

# Resource: Rural HIV/AIDS Prevention and Treatment Toolkit

This toolkit describes evidence-based and promising models that span the HIV care continuum, as well as ideas for identifying and adapting interventions for people at risk for and living with HIV in rural communities. Developed by HRSA’s Rural Health Information Hub, this toolkit can help organizations in rural communities learn how to develop, implement, evaluate, and sustain rural HIV/AIDS programs. 

http://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/community-health/hiv-aids?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
#### § 1499.19 Paperwork Reduction Act.

The information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, and have been assigned OMB control number 0551-0035. A person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

[81 FR 62605, Sept. 12, 2016, as amended at 87 FR 53369, Aug. 31, 2022]
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal control over financial reporting.
 5
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs
auditors and the audit committee of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date:      August 14, 2007
    /s/ John KingsburyJohn Kingsbury, Treasurer (PrincipalFinancial Officer)
#### § 1221.13 Importer.

*Importer* means any person importing more than 1,000 bushels of grain sorghum; or 5,000 tons of sorghum forage, sorghum hay, sorghum haylage, sorghum billets, or sorghum silage into the United States in a calendar year as a principal or as an agent, broker, or consignee of any person who produces or purchases sorghum outside of the United States for sale in the United States, and who is listed as the importer of record for such sorghum.
§ 1280.203 Nominee's agreement to serve. Any producer, feeder, first handler, or seedstock producer nominated to serve on the Board shall file with the Secretary at the time of the nomination a written agreement to: ( a ) Serve on the Board if appointed;
( b ) Disclose any relationship with any lamb promotion entity or with any organization that has or is being considered for a contractual relationship with the Board; and
( c ) Withdraw from participation in deliberations, decision-making, or voting on matters that concern the relationship disclosed under paragraph (b) of this section.
#### Arthur Adonizio, an Infant, by Hilda Adonizio, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. House of St. Giles The Cripple, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 1, 1966, affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the verdict was not excessive in light of the injuries incurred by the infant plaintiff. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur; Benjamin, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial, on the ground that the verdict is grossly excessive.