alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Youth AFFIRM: Affirmative Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender & Questioning (LGBTQ+) Populations      

# Resource: Youth AFFIRM: Affirmative Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender & Questioning (LGBTQ+) Populations

This fact sheet (PDF, 2 pages) provides an overview of AFFIRM Youth, a coping-skills training intervention focused on reducing mental health issues and behavioral risks experienced by LGBTQ+ populations. **Learn more.**
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: New Data on Postsecondary Tuition, Fees, and Degrees      

# Report: New Data on Postsecondary Tuition, Fees, and Degrees

This report provides a first look at the findings from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System fall 2016 collection, which measured cost of attendance in 2016-17, degrees and other awards conferred in 2015-16, and 12-month enrollment in 2015-16. 

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017075&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=Announcements&utm_campaign=Report
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**VIRGIL BARBER,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 145 EM 2014** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 19 th**  **day of November, 2014, the Application for Extraord inary** 

**Relief is** DENIED

**.**
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****MEPShighlights [electronic resource].**** 
SuDocNumber:HE20.6517/6:
ItemNumber:0491-B-28(online)
CGPsystem Number:000587982
 
 
**Title**
**Product  Type/No.
The Uninsured in America--1999
Highlights  #13
Per Capita Health Care Expenses, 1996.
Highlights  #12
Distribution of Health Care Expenses, 1996.
Highlights  #11
The Uninsured in America -- 1997.
Highlights  #10
Health Care Use in America -- 1996.
Highlights  #09
Uninsured Workers--Job Characteristics, 1996.
Highlights  #08
Uninsured Workers--Demographic Characteristics, 1996.
Highlights  #07
Health Insurance Profile: Race/Ethnicity and Sex--1996.
Highlights  #06
Job-Based Health Insurance--1987 and 1996.
Highlights  #05
Health Insurance Coverage in America-1996.
Highlights  #04
Access to Health Care in America, 1996.
Highlights  #03
Nursing Home Update-1996.
Highlights  #02
The Uninsured in America--1996.
Highlights  #01
 
 
 
 ****
#### § 1222.71 Books and records.

Each manufacturer and importer shall maintain any books and records necessary to carry out the provisions of this subpart and regulations issued thereunder, including such records as are necessary to verify any required reports. Such books and records must be made available during normal business hours for inspection by the Board's or Secretary's employees or agents. Manufacturers and importers must maintain the books and records for two years beyond the fiscal year to which they apply.
Nicor
      Inc.


Form
      10-Q


Exhibit
      32.01





**CERTIFICATION**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nicor Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      hereby
      certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
      period ended September 30, 2007 (the “ Report ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                November 1, 2007
            
            /s/
                RUSS M. STROBELRuss
                M. StrobelChairman,
                President and Chief Executive
                Officer
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1421.113 Recourse MALs. ( a ) CCC will make recourse MALs available to eligible producers of high moisture corn, high moisture grain sorghum, commodities that fall within acceptable levels of contamination and remain merchantable, and other eligible loan commodities as determined by the Deputy Administrator, Farm Programs.
( b ) Repayment is required to be paid in full at principal plus interest on or before the loan maturity date.
( c ) Recourse MAL collateral may not be delivered or forfeited to CCC in satisfaction of the loan indebtedness.
[67 FR 63511, Oct. 11, 2002. Redesignated at 70 FR 33799, June 10, 2005. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 15655, Apr. 7, 2009; 80 FR 126, 129, Jan. 2, 2015; 86 FR 70705, Dec. 13, 2021]
§ 1214.81 Referenda. ( a ) *Required referendum.* For the purpose of ascertaining whether the persons subject to this Order favor the amendment, continuation, suspension, amendment, or termination of this Order, the Secretary shall conduct a referendum among persons subject to assessments under § 1214.52 who, during a representative period determined by the Secretary, have engaged in the production or importation of Christmas trees: ( 1 ) The first referendum shall be conducted not later than 3 years after assessments first begin under the Order;
( 2 ) The order will be approved in a referendum if: ( i ) A majority of producers and importers vote for approval in the referendum.
( b ) *Subsequent referenda.* The Secretary shall conduct subsequent referenda: ( 1 ) For the purpose of ascertaining whether producers and importers favor the continuation, suspension, or termination of the Order;
( 2 ) Every seven years the Secretary shall hold a referendum to determine whether producers and importers of Christmas trees favor the continuation of the Order. The Order shall continue if it is favored by a majority of producers and importers voting for approval in the referendum who have been engaged in the production or importation of Christmas trees;
( 3 ) At the request of the Board established in this Order;
( 4 ) At the request of 10 percent or more of the number of persons eligible to vote in a referendum as set forth under the Order; or
( 5 ) At any time as determined by the Secretary.
NICOR Inc.
                                                                  Form S-8
                                                                  Exhibit 5.01





                             MAYER, BROWN & PLATT
                          190 South La Salle Street
                         Chicago, Illinois 60603-3441
                          
                                 June 5, 1997





NICOR Inc.
1844 West Ferry Road
Naperville, IL  60563



Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We are representing NICOR Inc. (the "Company") in connection
with the filing of Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 33-31029 and of a new registration statement (the
"Registration Statements") which together provide for the
registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of 2,000,000 shares
of its common stock (the "Stock") for offering pursuant to
NICOR's 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan").  In
connection therewith, we have examined or are otherwise familiar
with the Articles of Incorporation of the Company as amended to
date, the By-Laws of the Company as amended to date, the Plan,
the Registration Statements, minutes of such meetings of the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of the Company as we have
deemed necessary and such other documents and instruments as we
have deemed necessary for the purpose of this opinion.

     Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the
Stock is duly authorized for issue and, when issued and delivered
to participants or their transferees in accordance with the
provisions of the Plan, will be legally issued, fully paid and
non-assessable shares of the Company.

     We hereby consent to the filing of  this opinion as an
Exhibit to the Registration Statements.


                         Very truly yours,

                         MAYER, BROWN & PLATT     
                         Mayer, Brown & Platt
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification

(Principal Executive Officer)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chaparral
Steel Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tommy A. Valenta, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 11, 2006



/s/ Tommy A. ValentaTommy A. ValentaPrincipal Executive Officer
##### 



Page 13 of 23Exhibit 99(e) KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-B
OFFICERS CERTIFICATE Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, IT
    
    KeyBank National Association60 Wall Street, 26th Floor  MS NYC60-2606
    
    800 Superior Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10005
    
    Cleveland, Ohio 44114Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
    
    ATTN: President, KERStructured Finance
    
    Phone: (216) 828-4293Phone: (212) 250-8522
    
    Fax: (216) 828-9301Fax: (212) 797-8606MBIA Insurance Corporation113 King StreetArmonk, NY 10504ATTN: Data AdministrationPhone: (914) 765-3772Fax:(914) 765-3810
 Pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Indenture between KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-B, as Issuer, and
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, successor in interest to Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture
Trustee, dated September 1, 2000, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of the Issuer from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2004, and of its performance
under the Indenture has been made, and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
Issuer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Indenture throughout such period. KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-B,By:
    
    KeyBank National Association, successor ininterest to Key Bank USA, NationalAssociation, as AdministratorDate: March 14, 2005
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /S/ DANIEL G. SMITHName:
    
    Daniel G. SmithTitle:
    
    Senior Vice PresidentBy:
    
    /S/ KRISTA C. NEALName:
    
    Krista C. NealTitle:
    
    Vice President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David A. Sipe, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 370]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tompkins County (Barrett, J.), rendered March 16, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of robbery in the first degree (three counts), grand larceny in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Defendant was charged in an 11-count indictment with numerous crimes after robbing a bank in the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County. After placing a bag over his head, defendant entered a bank and, at gunpoint, demanded that the teller turn over money. After leaving with the money, defendant was involved in a high speed car chase with police and was ultimately apprehended. Defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree in full satisfaction of the indictment. No promise was made concerning sentencing. Defendant was subsequently sentenced to various concurrent terms of imprisonment, the maximum of which was nine years on the robbery convictions.

Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the sentence is harsh and excessive. Notwithstanding defendant’s lack of criminal record, we find his argument unconvincing *(see e.g. People v Curry,*294 AD2d 608, 612 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 674 [2002]). The circumstances of the incident reveal that defendant carefully planned the robbery, seriously traumatized bank employees while executing it and jeopardized the safety of the police and the public during the high speed chase. Consequently, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice *(see People v King,*277 AD2d 708, 712 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 802 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe aerodynamic design of the oblique flying wing supersonic transportThe aerodynamic design of a supersonic oblique flying wing is strongly influenced by the requirement that passengers must be accommodated inside the wing. It was revealed that thick oblique wings of very high sweep angle can be efficient at supersonic speeds when transonic normal Mach numbers are allowed on the upper surface of the wing. The goals were motivated by the ability to design a maximum thickness, minimum size oblique flying wing. A 2-D Navier-Stokes solver was used to design airfoils up to 16 percent thickness with specified lift, drag and pitching moment. A new method was developed to calculate the required pressure distribution on the wing based on the airfoil loading, normal Mach number distribution and theoretical knowledge of the minimum drag of oblique configurations at supersonic speeds. The wing mean surface for this pressure distribution was calculated using an inverse potential flow solver. The lift to drag ratio of this wing was significantly higher than that of a comparable delta wing for cruise speeds up to Mach 2.Document ID19900019224Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsVandervelden, Alexander J. M.*(Stanford Univ. CA, United States)*Kroo, Ilan*(Stanford Univ. CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-177552A-90168NAS 1.26:177552Accession Number90N28540Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NCA2-343PROJECT: RTOP 505-60-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900019224.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
(May 30, 1980)

#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Frank S. Garofalo, Respondent.

Motion by appellant for reargument and reconsideration of decision dated July 26, 1979 [71 AD2d 782] granted. Order entered August 8, 1979 vacated. Upon reargument, we adhere to our original determination dismissing the People’s appeal. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur. Herlihy, J., concurs in the granting of *981reargument but votes to reverse the order appealed from for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion dated July 26,1979 [71 AD2d 782, 783].
#### *Gaines vs. Dailey.*

Motion.

Case 124.

Error to the Franklin Circuit; Henrx Davidge, Judge.

*New trial. Duty of Court. Condition.*

June 12.

An order, lew trial,athe def’ts. paying the costs of days prior to the next term, a nullity, and *479the pl’tff. has a right to his execution.-

*478Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Dailey having obtained a judgment against Gaines, in an action of assumpsit, the court on the motion of Gaines, made the following order, “28th July, 1827. The court being now sufficiently advised of the motion made for a new trial herein, it is ordered’that U be granteJ *on the defendant's paying the costs °f the former trial herein, twenty days before the next term of this court''*

*479Triplett, for plaintiff; Sanders, for defendant.

Before the next term, but within the 20 days; Dailey issued an execution on the judgment. Gaines moved the court to quash this execution, which the court refused to do. And for this refusal, Gaines has prosecuted this writ of error.

The order of the court, is extraordinary; and it is difficult to give to it, a satisfactory construction. If it be construed to be the grant of a new trial, on a condition subsequent, the execution might possibly have been quashed; but if it be understood to be an order for a new trial, on the precedent condition of payment of the costs, the execution issued properly.'

We are inclined to the opinion, that the court intended, that the judgment should be suspended until 20 days preceding the next term; and that then, if the Costs should be paid, there should be a new trial. The parties were notified, that there would be a new trial, on a certain contingency. But the court had not given a new trial. Such an order, should be regarded as a nullity, even if the defendant had complied with the Condition. Courts ought not to leave their judicial acts, to depend on an act *en*pais, or to be controlled by ministerial officers. When a motion is made for a new trial, only three things are left to the discretion of the court; that is, either to continue the motion, or to grant, or overrule it. The court cannot refer to the parties or to the clerk, a decision of the question, whether there shall be a new trial or not.

Dailey had a right therefore, as soon as the term expired, to issue his execution. But if the order of the court had been such as to deserve respect, there seems to have been no ground for the quashal of the execution. Because, as Gaines was to be entitled toa new trial, on the condition of paying the costs 20 days before the next term, he ought to have shewn such payment, before he could expect to be benefitted by the order. This he did not do. And no further notice is taken of the case, at any subsequent term.

Wherefore, the judgment of the circuit court, overruling the motion, to quash the execution,is affirmed.
#### John Brighenti et al. *v.*The New Britain Shirt Corporation

*Joseph P. Cianci,*for the appellees (plaintiffs).

*Harry W. Hultgren, Jr.,*for the appellant (defendant).

Argued November 2

decided November *2,*1971

The motion by the plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is denied.