alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1  CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP,
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement of Specialty Laboratories, Inc.
pertaining to the Specialty Laboratories, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and
Specialty Laboratories, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8 No.
333-52348 and No. 333-88136) of our report dated January 31, 2003 with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Specialty
Laboratories, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2002.  /s/  ERNST & YOUNGLos Angeles, California
  March 17, 2003
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1410.80 CLEAR 30 Pilot Program. ( a ) Not withstanding § 1410.6(b) and (c), to be eligible under the CLEAR 30 Pilot Program, land must be: ( 1 ) Physically located within a CLEAR 30 Pilot Program area, as announced by CCC;
( 2 ) Devoted to a grass waterway, contour grass strip, prairie strip, filter strip, riparian buffer, wetland restoration practice, or other similar water quality practice that helps reduce sediment loadings, nutrient loadings, and harmful algal blooms; and
( 3 ) Enrolled in CRP, in the final year of the CRP contract period, provided the scheduled expiration date of the current CRP contract is: ( i ) On or after December 20, 2018; and
( ii ) Before the effective starting date of the new CRP contract.
( b ) The contract period for land enrolled under the CLEAR 30 Pilot Program will be 30 years.
( c ) In addition to the provisions in § 1410.32 and elsewhere in this part, the CRP contract for land enrolled under the CLEAR 30 Pilot Program will: ( 1 ) Permit repairs, improvements, and inspections on the land that are necessary to maintain existing public drainage systems; and
( 2 ) Prohibit: ( i ) Alteration of wildlife habitat and other natural features of the land, unless authorized by CCC and provided for in the conservation plan;
( ii ) Mowing or spraying chemicals on the land, unless such action is authorized by CCC to: ( A ) Comply with Federal or State noxious weed laws;
( B ) Comply with a Federal or State emergency pest management program; or
( C ) Meet habitat needs of specific wildlife; and
( iii ) Adoption of any other practice or action that would tend to defeat the purpose of CRP.
( d ) Land enrolled under the CLEAR 30 Pilot Program may be used for compatible economic uses, including but not limited to hunting and fishing, managed timber harvest, or periodic haying or grazing, provided the use is: ( 1 ) Included in the conservation plan; and
( 2 ) Consistent with the long-term protection and enhancement of the conservation resource for which the land was enrolled.
( e ) Notwithstanding § 1410.30, offers for contracts under the CLEAR 30 Pilot Program may be submitted only during a time period, as determined and announced by CCC, and only within the final year of the contract period of the CRP contract under which the land is currently enrolled.
( f ) In addition to the provisions in § 1410.52, upon a violation of the terms and conditions of a contract for land enrolled under the CLEAR 30 Pilot Program, CCC may require the participant to refund all or part of any payments received under CRP plus interest and liquidated damages.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1468.5 Scheme or device. ( a ) In addition to other penalties, sanctions, or remedies that may apply, if it is determined by NRCS that anyone has employed a scheme or device to defeat the purposes of this part, any part of any program payment otherwise due or paid during the applicable period may be withheld or be required to be refunded with interest, thereon, as determined appropriate by NRCS.
( b ) A scheme or device includes, but is not limited to, coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, depriving anyone of a program benefit, or for the purpose of obtaining a payment to which they would otherwise not be entitled.
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Tri-Valley Corporation. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   | August 2, 2010                                                |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:               | /s/ John E. Durbin                                            |
|              | John E. Durbin, Chief Financial OfficerTri-Valley Corporation |
# J!kM^Am„<<m,~^^-.J&^
id^^^m,

y^fc^^GS^^^.^^

### TM0W VL tfsm C^USE•* J3Z233S, -msormoF-mm ^yn^iSJQA rtg ?TMg



## TO TW£ /4ON0MBU2 JUfi^E OFSAI& COURf; Comes utaw iTHOTfiy Fisher (i>gF&»MriPm-m m Ttfe >&&ME 5ryte hqmbsk msE m s^tes; 

### DHFENMtfT /S Rfi3U6STlMS m ATM*& EXTEHSkM to BBABiB *7P Fim P£R BftrtfF-TO C'GA Court due 7b /*rs Ufck ofKhoMjeuse A-a> ay "Uiat0#a& PR6^& m to the /acr Ms 44wy#* PflovH>s> ^ T#£ ST/KTB THAT Film MS DIRECT APPmL Wrr M$ m$ M iMFT A* Due to the &tr im pepmwfr is cuRf?sN7iy PM^ W7^i«ri^

._.- „ HECEIVED ' , FIRSTCOURT OFAPPEALS ! HOUSTON, TEXASI ' OCT 1 2 2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRIME ICLERK 

### W TH6 W OF

### mm the moti&jaiotjLbm &Wna> ... \£Hm>±*~*.loixxxpa-rk/ TT>. 16%?7
ov)#vW*s 

### ^gus^ 

### ^11^ WORTH TEXAS TX FSDC DALLAS TX 750 •06 -OCT 2015 FM 7 L 

# /•Trst Districtcourtatappeal \smcr cteR^K applet 201 FAfltiM ST
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry Stevenson, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

ss.1350,as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 20th day of July, 2011.

 

 

/s/Garry Stevenson

Chief FinancialOfficer
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1427.168 [Reserved]
IB 

Union Calendar No. 305 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1121 

[Report No. 118–19, Parts I and II] 

To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2023 

Mr. DUNCAN (for himself, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, Mr. PERRY, Mr. ESTES, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. JACKSON of Texas, Mr. CARL, Mr. STAUBER, Mr. KUSTOFF, 

Mr. ARMSTRONG, Mr. WOMACK, Mr. FINSTAD, Ms. BOEBERT, Mr. 

OGLES, Mr. VALADAO, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. BABIN, Mr. BOST, and Mr. 

BALDERSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on 

Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JANUARY 31, 2024 

Additional sponsors: Mr. GRIFFITH, Ms. DE LA CRUZ, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. 

BUCSHON, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. CLINE, and Mr. BRECHEEN

JANUARY 31, 2024 

Reported from the Committee on Natural Resources; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be 

printed 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1121 RH

A BILL 

To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1121 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting American 

5 Energy Production Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTING AMERICAN ENERGY PRODUCTION. 

7 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con8 gress that States should maintain primacy for the regula9 tion of hydraulic fracturing for oil and natural gas produc10 tion on State and private lands. 

11 (b) PROHIBITION ON DECLARATION OF A MORATO12 RIUM ON HYDRAULIC FRACTURING.—Notwithstanding 

13 any other provision of law, the President may not declare 

14 a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing unless 

15 such moratorium is authorized by an Act of Congress. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 305 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1121 

[Report No. 118–19, Parts I and II] 

A BILL 

To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic 

fracturing. 

JANUARY 31, 2024 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### *Emily vs. Smith.*

trespass.

Case 160.

Error to the Montgomery Circuit; Silas W. Robbins, judge.

*Manumission. Guardianship.*

June 18.

Deed of manumission, the of thelfnfant reserved tó ’ the grantor, 0nff and eno^wRhhis death,

*Monroe,*for plaintiff; *Triplett,*for defendant-*

Judge Underwood

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The deed under which the plaintiff in error claims her freedom, completely emancipated her, from the time of its execution, with the reservation to retain the guardianship of Emily, then an infant; until she should arrive at age. This reservation was personal to Enoch Smith; The defendant had no right to retain the plaintiff; against her will, after the death of said Enoch. The evidence conduced to show an illegal detention. The court erred in their instructions to the jury, to find, as in case of a non-suit.

The judgment must, therefore, be reversed with costs, and a new trial awarded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5375-N-44]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         November 12, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh                               ( print page 69457)                            Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: November 4, 2010.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 2010-28281 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ROBERTO CARLOS LOPEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10429 

D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00796-SPL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 15, 2017**

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Roberto Carlos Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 84-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for 

possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(5)(B), 

(b)(2), and 2256. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 20 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-10429 

Lopez contends that at sentencing, the district court procedurally erred by 

referring to 20,000 victims, rather than 20,000 images, and by failing to explain 

why it imposed a sentence greater than the sentences imposed in unrelated cases. 

We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 

1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and conclude that there is none. The record reflects that the 

district court understood that Lopez possessed over 20,000 images and simply 

misspoke when it referred to 20,000 victims. Moreover, the district court 

adequately explained the sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 

(9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). It was not required to address each sentencing disparity 

alleged by Lopez. See United States v. Treadwell, 593 F.3d 990, 1012 (9th Cir. 

2010). 

Lopez also argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of 

the lower sentences recommended by the probation office and by the government, 

and in light of the alleged disparity between his sentence and the sentences of 

similarly situated defendants. The district court did not abuse its discretion. See 

Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The district court took account of 

disparity concerns and imposed a below-Guidelines sentence that is substantively 

reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of 

the circumstances. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51.

AFFIRMED.
§ 1212.43 Removal and vacancies. ( a ) In the event that any member or alternate of the Board ceases to be a member of the category of members from which the member was appointed to the Board, such position shall become vacant.
( b ) The Board may recommend to the Secretary that a member be removed from office if the member consistently refuses to perform his or her duties or engages in dishonest acts or willful misconduct. The Secretary may remove the member if he or she finds that the Board's recommendation shows adequate cause.
( c ) A vacancy for any reason will be filled as follows: ( 1 ) If a member position becomes vacant, the alternate for that position will serve the remainder of the member's term. In accordance with § 1212.42, the Secretary will request nominations for a replacement alternate and will appoint a nominee to serve the remainder of the term. The Secretary does not have to appoint a replacement if the unexpired term is less than six months.
( 2 ) If both a member position and an alternate position become vacant, in accordance with § 1212.42, the Secretary will request nominations for replacements and appoint a member and alternate to serve the remainder of the term. The Secretary does not have to appoint a new member or alternate if the unexpired term for the position is less than six months.
( 3 ) No successor appointed to a vacated term of office shall serve more than two successive three-year terms on the Board.
### 9087 NailRood 

### IJox Walk, MIUJ'ssippl 

### 38680

Mr. Det\is Devany$ 

### Chief EAS & 

### Domestic Analysis 

### Division 

### Office of Aviation Deputmem of 

### Transportation l200 New Jersey Ave SE Wubington .• DC--"''""' 

### ApriJ 

### 20l2

IE:**T~pelo** Regional Airport (TUP) Docket DOT ..OST**~2009-0305** 

### Dear Mr, 

### Devany: Olfke 

### (662) 781

.. 1282 fax 

### (662)781-5444

I am wridne in 

### IUppon of Silver**Airways~** proposal to provide 

### commercial air service to the Tupelo ha1onal Airport Cttitena bm Walls. 

### would fd:e to be able to utilia the Tupelo Regiooal Airport their**~** 

### tt is imponant to our 

### beat tcOnOmy for air serviee to and out ofTupelo. We**be~** Silver airwaysJ interline tieketin,s and**~** 

### asrcanans with 

### Delta Airlines**~~this** 

### option very attractive to 

### our**a~.** 

### In 

### addition1tle
to •• aimaft the I aitendt offered bfAir Choice Omt 

## We

are excited about return 

### to profitabiUty. Thank 

### you for considering our**ci~** 

### iD: 

### your**·deliberc~tions,**



### Lynda**Austi~** 

### Mayor Town 

### Of WaiJs ·
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Improving Retention Through Trauma-Informed Approach      

# Resource: Improving Retention Through Trauma-Informed Approach

This WorkforceGPS tip sheet addresses one of the main reasons that participants disengage from apprenticeship programs: the behavioral effects of past or present trauma. By implementing trauma-informed care (TIC) practices, YARG grantees can better mitigate the effects of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), thereby supporting recovery from trauma and motivating a higher level of commitment to career path goals. **Learn more and access the tip sheet.**
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eastern Insurance Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce M. Eckert, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 6, 2010 |  | /s/ Bruce M. Eckert    
|                  |  | Bruce M. Eckert        
|                  |  | Chief Executive Officer



35