alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13a-14
PROMULGATED UNDER
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Penson Worldwide, Inc;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Reserved](c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 28, 2007/s/ Philip A. PendergraftPhilip A. PendergraftChief Executive Officerand principal executive officer
#### § 1222.27 Suspend.

*Suspend* means to issue a rule under 5 U.S.C. 553 to temporarily prevent the operation of an order or part thereof during a particular period of time specified in the rule.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA network flow model for load balancing in circuit-switched multicomputersIn multicomputers that utilize circuit switching or wormhole routing, communication overhead depends largely on link contention - the variation due to distance between nodes is negligible. This has a major impact on the load balancing problem. In this case, there are some nodes with excess load (sources) and others with deficit load (sinks) and it is required to find a matching of sources to sinks that avoids contention. The problem is made complex by the hardwired routing on currently available machines: the user can control only which nodes communicate but not how the messages are routed. Network flow models of message flow in the mesh and the hypercube were developed to solve this problem. The crucial property of these models is the correspondence between minimum cost flows and correctly routed messages. To solve a given load balancing problem, a minimum cost flow algorithm is applied to the network. This permits one to determine efficiently a maximum contention free matching of sources to sinks which, in turn, tells one how much of the given imbalance can be eliminated without contention.Document ID19900014661Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsBokhari, Shahid H.*(University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Pakistan)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategoryComputer SystemsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:182049ICASE-90-38AD-A227492NASA-CR-182049Accession Number90N23977Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18605Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014661.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 31.1

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

I, Michael L. Hurt, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Altra Industrial Motion, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s third fiscal quarter of 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

| November 13, 2007 | By:   | /s/ Michael L. Hurt                  |
|-------------------|-------|--------------------------------------|
|              | Name: | Michael L. Hurt                      |
|              | Title | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit
15.1













Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors
Syngenta AG, Basel



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
registration statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-101794) pertaining to the Syngenta Deferred Share Plan
(Share Awards) and Syngenta AG Executive Stock Option Plan 10,
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-117497) pertaining to the Syngenta Deferred Share Plan,
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-124836) pertaining to the Syngenta Corporation Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-130440) pertaining to the Syngenta Share Plan for Non-Executive
Directors
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



of our reports dated February 2, 2016,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Syngenta AG and subsidiaries (“Syngenta AG”) as of December 31,
2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in equity for each
of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2015, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2015, which reports appear in the December 31, 2015 annual report on Form 20-F of Syngenta AG.





/s/ KPMG AG





Basel, Switzerland



February 11, 2016
#### § 1205.310 Importer.

*Importer* means many person who enters, or withdraws from warehouse, cotton for consumption in the customs territory of the United States, and the term *import* means any such entry.

[56 FR 64472, Dec. 10, 1991]
§ 1212.55 Prohibition on use of funds. ( a ) The Board may not engage in, and shall prohibit the employees and agents of the Board from engaging in: ( 1 ) Any action that is a conflict of interest;
( 2 ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, using funds collected by the Board under the Order to undertake any action for the purpose of influencing legislation or governmental action or policy, by local, state, national, and foreign governments, other than recommending to the Secretary amendments to the Order.
( 3 ) A program, plan or project conducted pursuant to this subpart that includes false or misleading claims on behalf of honey or honey products.
( 4 ) Any advertising, including promotion, research and information activities authorized that may be false or misleading or disparaging to another agricultural commodity.
( b ) The prohibition in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall not apply: ( 1 ) To the development and recommendation of amendments to this subpart; or
( 2 ) To the communication to appropriate government officials, in response to a request made by the officials, of information relating to the conduct, implementation, or results of promotion, research, consumer information, education, industry information, or producer information activities authorized under this subpart.
Exhibit 10.32


Loan Agreement


 


Party
A: Consumer Capital Group Inc


Party
B: Caesar Capital Management Ltd


In
order to help party B properly make payments for the Company’s
audit fee, legal professional fees, public relations services fee, transfer agent fee, and other related costs required to properly
maintain Company’s filing under "1934 Securities Exchange
Act", the Party A to Party B to reached an agreement after negotiation as follows:


 


		1.	Purpose
of loan: For the payment to Anton & Chia, LLP for June
30, 2012 financial reporting quarterly review fees.






 


		2.	Amount
of loan: $10,400.00



 


		3.	Loan
starting date: July 9, 2012 



 


		4.	Loan
due date: July 8, 2013



 


		5.	Interest
rate of loan: 6%/year



 


		6.	Type
of loan: Unsecured loan



 


		7.	Restrictive
clause: As if Party A fails the repay loan in time, pay a surcharge of 5%



 


		8.	Each of the parties should behave in good faith with the above. In
case of any disputes, both parties agree to resolve by the Hong Kong Arbitration Commission.



 


		9.	This Loan Agreement comes effective when Party B obtained payment document, and when it is
signed by the representatives of the each party.






 


Party
A: Consumer Capital Group Inc


Signature:


 


Party
B: Caesar Capital Management Ltd


Signature:
### Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________ Project No.: 0172.07.005.507 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1 _ of __1

_

Project Name: 304(m) Annual Review

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 7/6/2010 Time: 1:30 pm EST

Company Name: West Virginia Department of Environmental

Quality (WVDEQ) Contact Name: Linda Simmons

Phone No.: (304) 926-0499 x 1011

Name: Elizabeth Sabol Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : PAC Discharges Reported to DMR in 2008 for E I DuPont De Nemours (WV0001279)



## TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I called the West Virginia Department of Environmental Q uality (WVDEQ) on July 6, 2010, to speak with

Linda Simmons regarding PAC discharges from E I DuPont De Nemours (WV0001279) reported in 2008. I left

Ms. Simmons a message explaining the reason for my call and to please return my call at her earliest

convenience.

Ms. Simmons returned by call on July 12, 2010. I asked her to c onfirm several PAC discharges from outfalls

002 and 005 for the EI DuPont De Nemours facility in 2008. She s tated that she could send me the discharge

monitoring reports on file. Please see attached file se nt July 12, 2010.

I called Ms. Simmons back on July 13, 2010 to get confirmation regarding the PAC data. There were no below

detection limit (BDL) indicators on the discharge monit oring report. Ms. Simmons stated that all PAC

discharges are non-detect for this facility.
#### § 1001.15 Fluid milk product.

See § 1000.15.
§ 1230.34 Term of office. ( a ) The members of the Delegate Body shall serve for terms of one year, except that the members of the initial Delegate Body shall serve only until the completion of the nomination and appointment process of the succeeding Delegate Body.
( b ) Each member of the Delegate Body shall serve until that member's term expires, or a successor is appointed, whichever occurs later.
#### § 1220.204 Appointment.

From the nominations made pursuant to § 1220.203, the Secretary shall appoint the members of the Board on the basis of representation provided for in § 1220.201.
#### § 1280.630 FSA State office report.

Each FSA State office shall transmit to the Administrator, FSA, as soon as possible, but in no event later than the 20th business day following the final day of the voting period, a report summarizing the data contained in each of the reports from the county FSA offices. One copy of the State summary shall be filed for a period of not less than 12 months after the results have been released and available for public inspection after the results have been released.
#### Paul M. Deutschman, Respondent, v First Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 855]

*364Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered November 10, 2003, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded damages in the principal amount of $226,834.96, plus costs, interest, and attorneys’ fees to be determined by a referee, unanimously modified, on the law, the principal sum reduced to $113,417.48, costs and attorneys’ fees denied, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order entered April 8, 2002, granting partial summary judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the final judgment. Appeal from decision, dated May 9, 2003, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

Defendant challenges the applicability of Labor Law § 191-c (3), relied on by the trial court in assessing damages, which provides that a principal who fails to pay a sales representative earned commissions in a timely manner is liable for double damages, as well as reasonable attorneys’ fees, court costs and disbursements. The statutory definition of “[s]ales representative” (Labor Law § 191-a [d]) is clearly limited to independent contractors *(Jin v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*310 F3d 84, 88 n 4 [2d Cir 2002]), as opposed to salaried or commissioned employees *(Goldberg v Select Indus.,*202 AD2d 312, 315 [1994]). The parties entered into an agreement that set forth the terms of plaintiff’s employment, including his salary, 401 (k) plan, employer-provided health insurance, paid vacation, sick days and other benefits. No serious argument can be made that plaintiff, a salaried employee, was an independent contractor. The doubling of damages and the award of attorneys’ fees and costs were thus improper.

The decision to award damages must stand, however. Notwithstanding the exclusion of a letter purporting to clarify or modify the parties’ agreement, commissions were still owed. Plaintiffs “Jim & Marylou” division was profitable because gross profits from “Whet Blu” had to be added to those of Jim & Marylou in order to determine profitability. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1434.7 Approved storage. ( a ) Loans will be made only on honey in approved storage, which will consist of a storage structure located on or off the farm that is determined by CCC to be under the control of the producer and affords safe storage for honey pledged as collateral for a loan. If the honey located in a farm storage structure is pledged as collateral that secures more than one loan, the honey must be segregated so as to preserve the identity of the honey securing such loan. Honey securing a loan must also be segregated from any honey not pledged as collateral for a loan that is stored in the same structure.
( b ) Producers may also obtain loans on honey packed in eligible containers and stored in facilities owned by third parties in which the honey of more than one person is stored if the honey that is to be pledged as collateral for a loan and that is stored identity preserved or is segregated from all other honey. Each container of the segregated quantity of honey must be marked with the producer's name, loan number, and lot number so as to identify the honey from other honey stored in the structure.
[66 FR 15177, Mar. 15, 2001, as amended at 80 FR 139, 141, Jan. 2, 2015]
970.2903-2 Application of State and local taxes to the Government. It is DOE policy to secure those immunities or exemptions from state and local taxes to which it is entitled under the Federal Constitution or state laws. In carrying out this policy, the Heads of Contracting Activities shall— ( a ) Take all necessary steps to preclude payment of any taxes for which any of the immunities or exemptions cited in this subpart are available. Advice of Counsel should be sought as to the availability of such immunities or exemptions; and
( b ) Acquire directly and furnish to contractors as Government furnished property, equipment, material, or services when, in the opinion of the Head of the Contracting Activity— ( 1 ) Such direct acquisition will result in substantial savings to the Government, taking into consideration any additional administrative costs;
( 2 ) Such direct acquisition will not have a substantial adverse effect on the relationship between DOE and its contractor; and
( 3 ) Such direct acquisition will not have a substantial adverse effect on the DOE program or schedules.
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 36372, July 22, 2009]
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 22

- 00089

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. CCL1

- FM2020

- 2242

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N THE 

### I NTEREST OF 

### C.B., A 

### C HILD2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On March 15, 2022, and March 30, 2022, we notified A ppellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless
A ppellant paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3. Appellant ha s not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b ).
Because A ppellant ha s not complied with a procedural requirement and the Texas Supreme Cou rt’s order of August 28, 2015, 1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f). Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43. 4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: April 21, 2022

1 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15

- 9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing c ourts of app eals’ fees).
|   | (1)  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-101794)pertaining to the Syngenta Deferred Share Plan (Share Awards) and Syngenta AG Executive Stock Option Plan 10, |
|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-117497)pertaining to the Syngenta Deferred Share Plan, |
|--------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (3)  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-124836)pertaining to the Syngenta Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, |
|--------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4)  | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-130440)pertaining to the Syngenta Share Plan for Non-Executive Directors, and |
|--------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (5)  | Registration Statement (Form F-3ASR No. 333-178015)pertaining to the Syngenta AG prospectus for the registration of debt securities offered by Syngenta Finance N.V.; |
|--------|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### John J. Collins, appellant, v. Minnie Freer, appellee.

Gen. No. 33,435.

Opinion filed June 24, 1929.

Marx Loehwing, for appellant: John T. Murray, of counsel. James C. McGloon, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.