12494 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 3, 2021 / Notices 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The 

ICR describes the nature of the 

information collection and its expected 

burden. The collection involves air 

carriers and foreign air carriers 

maintaining an accounting system to 

account for the passenger civil aviation 

security service fees collected and 

reporting this information to TSA on a 

quarterly basis, as well as retaining the 

data used for these reports for three 

fiscal years. 

DATES: Send your comments by April 2, 

2021. A comment to OMB is most 

effective if OMB receives it within 30 

days of publication. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open 

for Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Christina A. Walsh, TSA PRA Officer, 

Information Technology (IT), TSA–11, 

Transportation Security Administration, 

6595 Springfield Center Drive, 

Springfield, VA 20598–6011; telephone 

(571) 227–2062; email TSAPRA@

tsa.dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TSA 

published a Federal Register notice, 

with a 60-day comment period soliciting 

comments, of the following collection of 

information on December 14, 2020, 85 

FR 80131. 

Comments Invited 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. The ICR documentation will be 

available at http://www.reginfo.gov 

upon its submission to OMB. Therefore, 

in preparation for OMB review and 

approval of the following information 

collection, TSA is soliciting comments 

to— 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

information requirement is necessary for 

the proper performance of the functions 

of the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including using 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Information Collection Requirement 

Title: Imposition and Collection of 

Passenger Civil Aviation Security 

Service Fees. 

Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

OMB Control Number: 1652–0001. 

Forms(s): TSA Form 2502. 

Affected Public: Air carriers and 

foreign air carriers. 

Abstract: TSA regulations, 49 CFR 

part 1510, require air carriers and 

foreign air carriers to collect the 

‘‘September 11th Security Fee’’ from 

passengers and to remit the fee to TSA 

on a monthly basis. Air carriers and 

foreign air carriers are further required 

to submit quarterly reports to TSA that 

provide an accounting of the fees 

imposed, collected, refunded to 

passengers, and remitted to TSA and to 

retain this data for three years. TSA has 

temporarily suspended an additional 

requirement for air carriers with over 

50,000 passengers to submit annual 

audits of its fee collections and 

remittance; this requirement may be 

reinstated in the future. In December 

2013, the fee was statutorily 

restructured to be based on one-way 

trips rather than enplanements (the 

statute was further amended to state that 

the fee shall be $5.60 per one-way trip 

or $11.20 per round trip.) In 2014 and 

2015, TSA published interim final rules 

to implement these amendments to 49 

U.S.C. 44940. See 79 FR 35461 (June 20, 

2014) and 80 FR 31850 (June 5, 2015), 

respectively. This information 

collection request covers both the 

quarterly reports and the estimated 

impact should annual audits be 

reinstated in the future. 

Number of Respondents: 170. 

Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An 

estimated 2,760 hours annually. 

Dated: February 25, 2021. 

Christina A. Walsh, 

TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, 

Information Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04335 Filed 3–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management 

Notice To Resume the Preparation of a 

Final Environmental Impact Statement 

for the Construction and Operations 

Plan for Vineyard Wind LLC 

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice to resume the 

preparation of a final environmental 

impact statement. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Ocean Energy 

Management (BOEM) is resuming the 

preparation of a final environmental 

impact statement (FEIS) for the 

Construction and Operations Plan (COP) 

submitted by Vineyard Wind LLC 

(Vineyard Wind) concerning the 

construction and operation of an 800- 

megawatt wind energy facility offshore 

Massachusetts (Vineyard Wind 1 Project 

or Project). 

DATES: Preparation of the FEIS resumed 

after BOEM completed its independent 

review of information provided in 

Vineyard Wind’s January 22, 2021, 

letter. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information, please contact: 

Michelle Morin, BOEM, Office of 

Renewable Energy Programs, 45600 

Woodland Road, Sterling, Virginia 

20166, (703) 787–1722 or 

michelle.morin@boem.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

December 2017, Vineyard Wind 

submitted a COP to BOEM for the 

Vineyard Wind 1 Project. On December 

7, 2018, BOEM published a draft EIS for 

the proposed Project in accordance with 

the National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 

seq.). On June 12, 2020, BOEM 

published a supplement to the draft EIS 

in response to requests from the public, 

Federal agencies, and stakeholders for 

an expanded cumulative analysis and 

an analysis of fishing data previously 

unavailable to BOEM. On December 1, 

2020, Vineyard Wind withdrew the COP 

‘‘from further review and decisionmaking by BOEM pursuant to 30 CFR 

585.628’’ to conduct additional 

technical and logistical reviews 

associated with the inclusion of the 

General Electric Haliade-X wind turbine 

generator in the final project design. In 

its letter, Vineyard Wind stated that it 

required additional time to review 

updated project parameters to confirm 

that the parameters fell within the 

project design envelope previously 

reviewed during the BOEM NEPA 

analysis. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 40 / Wednesday, March 3, 2021 / Notices 12495 

In response to Vineyard Wind’s 

December 1, 2020, letter, BOEM 

published a Federal Register notice on 

December 16, 2020, informing the 

public that ‘‘preparation of an 

Environmental Impact Statement’’ for 

the COP was ‘‘no longer necessary’’ for 

the sole reason that ‘‘the COP ha[d] been 

withdrawn from review and 

decisionmaking.’’ See 85 FR 81486 (Dec. 

16, 2020). Accordingly, BOEM 

‘‘terminated’’ the ‘‘preparation and 

completion’’ of the EIS. Id. 

On January 22, 2021, Vineyard Wind 

notified BOEM via letter that it had 

completed its technical and logistical 

due diligence review and had 

concluded that inclusion of the HaliadeX turbines did not warrant any 

modifications to the COP. Vineyard 

Wind therefore informed BOEM that it 

was rescinding its temporary 

withdrawal and asked BOEM to resume 

its review of the COP. Because Vineyard 

Wind has indicated that its proposed 

COP is ‘‘a decision pending before 

BOEM,’’ BOEM is resuming its review of 

the COP under NEPA. Id. Vineyard 

Wind’s COP and BOEM’s draft and 

supplemental EISs can be found at: 

https://www.boem.gov/vineyard-wind. 

Authority: This notice was prepared under 

NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and is 

published in accordance with Council on 

Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR 

parts 1500–508). 

William Y. Brown, 

Chief Environmental Officer, Bureau of Ocean 

Energy Management. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04392 Filed 3–2–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1203] 

Notice of a Commission Determination 

To Issue a Limited Exclusion Order 

Against the Defaulting Respondent; 

Termination of the Investigation; 

Certain Rolled-Edge Rigid Plastic Food 

Trays 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined to issue a limited exclusion 

order against defaulted respondent 

Ningbo Linhua Plastic Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Ningbo’’), the last remaining 

respondent. The Commission has also 

determined to impose a bond equal to 

one hundred percent (100%) of the 

entered value of the infringing products 

imported during the period of 

Presidential review. The investigation is 

hereby terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amanda Fisherow, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2737. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 

202–205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on June 23, 2020, based on a complaint 

filed by Clearly Clean Products, LLC of 

South Windsor, Connecticut and 

Converter Manufacturing, LLC of 

Orwigsburg, Pennsylvania 

(‘‘Complainants’’). 85 FR 37689–90 

(June 23, 2020). The complaint alleges a 

violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 

(‘‘section 337’’), by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 9,908,281 and 10,562,680. 

The notice of investigation named the 

following respondents: Eco Food Pak 

(USA), Inc. of Chino, California (‘‘Eco’’) 

and Ningbo Linhua Plastic Co., Ltd. of 

Fenghua, China (‘‘Ningbo’’). The 

Commission’s Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) also was named 

as a party. 

Eco was terminated from the 

investigation on October 20, 2020, on 

the basis of a consent order and consent 

order stipulation. Comm’n Notice (Oct. 

20, 2020). 

Also on October 20, 2020, the 

Commission determined not to review 

an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order 

No. 7) granting Complainants’ 

unopposed motion to find respondent 

Ningbo in default. Order No. 7 (Oct. 6, 

2020), unreviewed, Comm’n Notice (Oct. 

20, 2020). At that time, the Commission 

requested briefing on the issues of 

remedy, bonding, and the public 

interest with respect to Ningbo. 85 FR 

67566–67 (Oct. 23, 2020). 

On November 3, 2020, Complainants 

and OUII filed responses to the 

Commission’s request for briefing. Both 

parties also filed reply submissions on 

November 10, 2020. No other 

submissions were received. 

Upon review of the record, and in the 

absence of any response from Ningbo or 

from other interested persons or 

government agencies, and having 

concluded that it would not be contrary 

to the public interest to do so, the 

Commission has determined to issue a 

limited exclusion order against Ningbo 

pursuant to Section 337(g)(1), 19 U.S.C. 

1337(g)(1). However, the Commission 

declines to issue the requested cease 

and desist order against Ningbo because 

Complainants have not established that 

Ningbo maintains a commercially 

significant inventory in the U.S. or 

engages in significant commercial 

business operations in the United 

States, taking the allegations in the 

complaint as true, and as supported by 

the available circumstantial evidence. 

See Certain Arrowheads with Deploying 

Blades and Components Thereof and 

Packaging Therefor, Inv. 337–TA–997, 

Comm’n Op. at 16, 17–20 (Apr. 28, 

2017). Exhibits 19 and 20 to the 

Complaint reflect shipments of ‘‘trays’’ 

to terminated Respondent Eco, which 

has entered into a consent order in this 

investigation, and thus do not suggest 

ongoing commercial operations 

necessitating a CDO. Even assuming the 

shipments to non-parties reflected in 

Exhibit 19 included infringing products, 

the latest arrival of said shipments 

occurred in May 2018, and likewise do 

not support the inference that Ningbo or 

its agents maintain any, much less 

commercially significant, inventory in 

the U.S. See Compl., Ex. 19 at 9; cf. 

Certain Electric Skin Care Devices, 

Brushes and Chargers Therefor, and Kits 

Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337–TA– 

959, Comm’n Op. at 32 (Feb. 13, 2017) 

(evidence of ‘‘short lead times between 

order placement and delivery’’ and low 

shipping costs supported the inference 

that ‘‘U.S. purchases of the foreign 

respondents’ infringing products were 

made from U.S. inventories’’). The 

Commission has determined to set a 

bond in the amount of one hundred 

percent (100%) of the entered value of 

the covered products. 

Commissioner Karpel and 

Commissioner Schmidtlein would issue 

both an LEO and a CDO directed to 

defaulting respondent Ningbo pursuant 

to Section 337(g)(1) because all 

requirements of this provision are met. 

Ningbo was named in the complaint and 

was served with the complaint and 

notice of investigation. See Order No. 7 

(Oct. 6, 2020), unreviewed, Comm’n 

Notice (Oct. 20, 2020). The ALJ issued 

a show cause order ordering Ningbo to 

show cause why it should not be held 

in default for failing to respond to the 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES