alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: IES FY 2018 Research Funding Webinars      

# Resource: IES FY 2018 Research Funding Webinars

This series of on-demand webinars provides information on FY 2018 IES funding opportunities. Individuals interested in applying for these opportunities or learning more about IES can access the webinars as well as the accompanying presentation slides and answers to frequently asked questions. 

http://ies.ed.gov/funding/webinars/previous_webinars.asp?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resource
Water Quality Standards Regulatory		

Clarifications Proposed Rule:

Webinar Access Instructions

Thank	you	for	registering	for	the	first	webinar	on	EPA’s	Water	Quality	Standards	

Regulatory	Clarifications	Proposed	Rule.	The	webinar	is	schedule	for	September 24, 1:00‐

3:00 pm (Eastern).	Below,	please	find	information	on	how	to	access	the	webinar,	as	well	

as	several	important	notes.	

HOW TO ACCESS THE WEBINAR

There	are	two	ways	to	access	the	webinar.	If	your	computer	system	has	speakers,	please	

use	Option	1:	

Option 1—If your computer system has speakers:

1. Access	the	audio	and	video	portions	of	the	presentations	at:	

https://epa.connectsolutions.com/wqsruleweb1/		

a. Log	in	as	“Guest.”	Enter	your	first	and	last	name.	

b. You	will	see	the	screen	for	the	presentation.	On	the	right	side	of	the	screen,	

you	will	see	a	list	of	participants	and	a	“chat”	window.	

2. You	do	not	need	to	dial‐in	using	your	phone.	Once	EPA	begins	the	webinar,	you	will	

be	able	to	hear	the	presentation	through	your	computer’s	speakers.	

a. The	webinar	will	begin	at	1:00	pm	(Eastern).	If	you	log‐in	to	the	system	

before	that	time,	you	will	hear	silence.	

3. During	the	Q&A,	you	can	type	your	clarifying	questions	in	the	“chat”	window.	EPA	

will	respond	to	as	many	questions	as	time	allows,	but	may	not	be	able	to	respond	to	

every	question	submitted	during	the	webinar.	

Option 2—If your computer does not have speakers:

1. To	access	the	presentation,	go	to:	https://epa.connectsolutions.com/wqsruleweb1/		

a. Log	in	as	“Guest.”	Enter	your	first	and	last	name.	

b. You	will	see	the	screen	for	the	presentation.	On	the	right	side	of	the	screen,	

you	will	see	a	list	of	participants	and	a	“chat”	window.	

2. To	access	the	audio	portion,	dial	in	to	the	conference	line	through	your	phone:	

a. Conference	Number:		1‐866‐299‐3188		

b. Participant	Code:	2025661149		

c. The	webinar	will	begin	at	1:00	pm	(Eastern).	If	you	log	in	to	the	system	

before	that	time,	you	will	hear	silence.	

3. During	the	Q&A,	you	can	type	your	clarifying	questions	in	the	“chat”	window.	EPA	

will	respond	to	as	many	questions	as	time	allows,	but	may	not	be	able	to	respond	to	

every	question	submitted	during	the	webinar.	
OTHER NOTES:

 Please do not share the url or phone number so that EPA can be sure that

individuals who have pre‐registered are able to access the webinar.

 Test	your	system	prior	to	the	date	of	the	webinar	to	ensure	that	you	are	able	to	

connect.	To	test	your	system,	go	to:	

https://epa.connectsolutions.com/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm

 The	webinar	will	begin	at	1:00	pm	(Eastern).	If	you	log	in	to	the	system	before	that	

time,	you	will	hear	silence.	

 Please	use	your	computer	speakers	to	hear	the	presentation,	if	possible	(option	1	

above).		

o If	you	use	both	computer	speakers	and	dial	in	to	the	phone	call‐in	number,	

you	will	hear	feedback.	

 The	webinar	is	limited	to	500	individual	connections.		

o If	several	people	from	your	organization	will	be	participating	in	the	webinar,	

please	consider	joining	the	webinar	from	a	central	location.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Share with Youth: Pathways to Public Service Program (PTPS)      

# Share with Youth: Pathways to Public Service Program (PTPS)

The Pathways to Public Service (PTPS) program equips students of minority-serving institutions (MSIs) with the knowledge and skills needed to be viable candidates in their pursuit of careers in public service through internships and entry-level positions. 

Through virtual fairs and professional development workshops, students are educated on the mission of HHS, the Federal Government’s Pathways Programs, and the federal hiring process. **Learn more.**
[776 NYS2d 553]

#### In the Matter of Zaffar Bugtti, an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

May 11, 2004

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Thomas J. Cahill (Bianca Michaelis*of counsel), for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

*16Respondent Zaffar Bugtti was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on June 29, 1999. At all times relevant to this proceeding, his attorney registration form has reflected only a home address in Connecticut.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i), immediately suspending respondent from the practice of law for his failure to cooperate with the Committee in its investigation of professional misconduct. The Committee opened the investigation in April 2003 after receiving a complaint alleging that respondent had forged the complainant’s signature on a loan agreement without the complainant’s knowledge or consent.

Respondent failed to respond to the Committee’s letters sent to his home address, and the Committee’s ensuing attempts to locate him in New York or Connecticut were unavailing. The Connecticut Postmaster informed the Committee that respondent had moved from the address listed on his attorney registration form and left no forwarding address. The Committee also discovered that the property at the Connecticut address had been sold in May 2003, but it was unsuccessful in its attempts to contact the new owners. The Committee asserts that respondent left the United States some time in 2002 and was denied reentry in December of that year.

Since it appears that respondent left the country before the complaint was filed against him, it is likely that he never received notice of it. Nevertheless, his failure to inform the Office of Court Administration of changes to his addresses and telephone numbers, as required by Judiciary Law § 468-a, evidences a decision to make himself inaccessible to those to whom he is accountable, including the Committee. This conduct constitutes willful noncompliance with a Committee investigation, which warrants immediate suspension (22 NYCRR 603.4 [e] [1] [i]; *see Matter of Gujral,*307 AD2d 28 [2003]).

Accordingly, the Committee’s motion should be granted and respondent suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until such time as disciplinary matters pending before the Committee have been concluded and until further order of this Court.

Andreas, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ., concur.

*17Respondent suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof, and until such time as disciplinary matters pending before the Committee have been concluded and until further order of this Court.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPhysics of systems containing neutron starsThe following is a summary of work done during the  period of Mar. to Oct. 1989. Three major topics were extensively looked into during this time: the  reported 2,000 Hz optical signal from the direction of SNR1987A, the possibility that neutron stellar surface magnetic fields do not decay except when the star is accreting, and the 6  Hz QPOs of LMXBs.Document ID19900013151Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeOther - Collected WorksAuthorsShaham, Jacob*(Columbia Univ. New York, NY, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1989Subject CategoryAstronomyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186002NASA-CR-186002CAL-1793Accession Number90N22467Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-1618Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013151.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitleN90-22468 through N90-22470Workvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 1250.316 Representative of a producer.

*Representative of a producer* means the owner, officer, or an employee of a producer who has been duly authorized to act in the place and stead of the producer.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Diamond Discoveries
      International Corp. (the “ ***Company*** ”)
      for
      the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “ ***Report*** ”),
      I,
Antonio
      Sciacca, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                August 12, 2008By:
            /s/
                Antonio
                SciaccaName:
                Antonio
                SciaccaTitle:*CEO
                and Director*
§ 1400.207 Landowners. ( a ) A person or legal entity that is a landowner, including landowners with an undivided interest in land, making a significant contribution of owned land to the farming operation, will be considered to be actively engaged in farming with respect to the owned land, if the landowner: ( 1 ) Receives rent or income for the use of the land based on the land's production or the operation's operating results;
( 2 ) Has a share of the profits or losses from the farming operation commensurate with the landowner's contributions to the operation; and
( 3 ) Makes contributions to the farming operation that are at risk for a loss, with the level of risk being commensurate with the landowner's claimed share of the farming operation.
( b ) A landowner also includes a member of a joint operation if the joint operation holds title to land in the name of the joint operation and if the joint operation or its members submit adequate documentation to determine that, upon dissolution of the joint operation, the title to the land owned by the joint operation will revert to the member of the joint operation.
[73 FR 79273, Dec. 29, 2008, as amended at 85 FR 52039, Aug. 24, 2020]
NICOR Inc.   
                                                                Form S-8     
                                                                Exhibit 23.01







                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in this Form S-8 Registration Statement of our report dated
January 28, 1997, included in the NICOR Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1996.



                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                       Arthur Andersen LLP


Chicago, Illinois
June 4, 1997
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, T. Paul Bulmahn, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ATP Oil & Gas Corporation (the "Company"), do
hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof:



| | 1) | fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  |    
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: March 1, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ T. Paul Bulmahn                                            
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | T. Paul Bulmahn Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President
#### § 1131.74 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6922

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LORENZO ADDERLY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CR-95-74; CA-05-380)

Submitted: October 20, 2005 Decided: October 28, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenzo Adderly, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lorenzo Adderly seeks to appeal from the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is

debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the

district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v.

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.

473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Adderly

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
October 26, 1979

M. P. No. 77-194.

#### Catherine A. Greene v. Gloria M. McDonald, Warden, Women’s Division, Adult Correctional Institution.

Reing adjudged guilty of criminal contempt by a justice of the District Court, petitioner, Catherine A. Greene, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus, seeking relief from an order confining her in the Women’s Division, Adult Correctional Institution, for a period of 30 days. Upon filing of her petition, she was released on bail pending consideration of her appeal by this court.

We have heard oral argument, considered the briefs submitted by counsel, examined both the record and the judge’s certification. We find the record silent as to the circumstances surrounding the alleged offense, making proper consideration and review of the petition impossible. We hereby *890remand the petition for writ of habeas corpus and the papers to the Superior Court and direct said court to proceed to hold an evidentiary hearing. That court shall make findings as to the specific location of the alleged offense and as to all other facts and testimony attending the incident.

*Everett A. Petronio,*for petitioner. *Dennis J. Roberts II,*Attorney General. *Frederick G. Cass,*Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Upon termination of the evidentiary hearing in the Superior Court, the petition and papers therein shall be returned to this Court forthwith.
#### Marcia Guttentag, Appellant, v. David Guttentag, Respondent.

Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal from an alleged “order” of June 15, 1964 on the ground that said document is in fact a memorandum decision and hence is not an order from which an appeal may properly be taken. Motion denied. It appears that, based upon said decision a final judgment of separation was signed June 16, 1964 and entered June 18, 1964. Appellant served her notice of appeal on July 10, 1964, but inadvertently stated that she appeals from the “order” of June 15, 1964. Under the circumstances, and since the notice of appeal was timely served, the appeal will be deemed to have been taken from the judgment of June 16, 1964; the notice of appeal is amended accordingly (OPLR 5512, 2001). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 1218
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1218 appear at 66 FR 37118, 37119, July 17, 2001, and 71 FR 77245, Dec. 26, 2006.

§ 1218.52 Assessments. ( a ) The funds to cover the Council's expenses shall be paid from assessments on producers and importers, donations from any person not subject to assessments under this Order, and other funds available to the Board including those collected pursuant to § 1218.56 and subject to the limitations contained therein.
( b ) The collection of assessments on domestic blueberries will be the responsibility of the first handler receiving the blueberries. In the case of the producer acting as its own first handler, the producer will be required to collect and remit its individual assessments.
( c ) Such assessments shall be levied at a rate of $18 per ton (or $0.01984 per kg) on all blueberries. The assessment rate will be reviewed, and may be modified with the approval of the Secretary.
( d ) Each importer of fresh and processed blueberries shall pay an assessment to the Council on blueberries imported for marketing in the United States, through the U.S. Customs Service. ( 1 ) The assessment rate for imported fresh and processed blueberries shall be the same or equivalent to the rate for fresh blueberries produced in the United States.
( 2 ) The import assessment shall be uniformly applied to imported fresh and frozen blueberries that are identified by the numbers 0810.40.0029 and 0811.90.2028, respectively, in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States or any other numbers used to identify fresh and frozen blueberries. Assessments on other types of imported processed blueberries, such as dried blueberries, puree, and juice, may be added at the recommendation of the Council with the approval of the Secretary.
( 3 ) The assessments due on imported fresh and processed blueberries shall be paid when they enter or are withdrawn for consumption in the United States.
( e ) All assessment payments and reports will be submitted to the office of the Council. All final payments for a crop year are to be received no later than November 30 of that year. A late payment charge shall be imposed on any handler who fails to remit to the Council, the total amount for which any such handler is liable on or before the due date established by the Council. In addition to the late payment charge, an interest charge shall be imposed on the outstanding amount for which the handler is liable. The rate of interest shall be prescribed in regulations issued by the Secretary.
( f ) Persons failing to remit total assessments due in a timely manner may also be subject to actions under federal debt collection procedures.
( g ) The Council may authorize other organizations to collect assessments on its behalf with the approval of the Secretary.
[65 FR 43963, July 17, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 37119, July 17, 2001; 78 FR 59779, Sept. 30, 2013]