alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Health Coverage for Homeless and At-Risk Youth      

# Health Coverage for Homeless and At-Risk Youth

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

This fact sheet explores state-by-state eligibility for health care coverage, including through Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), for key subpopulations of youth experiencing or at risk of homelessness.

Behavioral health (mental health and substance abuse)

Federal programs

Health care

Homeless: families

Homeless: pregnant and parenting youth

Homeless: youth

Policy makers

Service providers

Fact sheet

Federal guidance

https://aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/health-coverage-homeless-and-risk-youth
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of International Coal Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officer’s knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





A signed original of this written statement required by § 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by § 906, has been provided to International Coal Group, Inc. and will be retained by International Coal Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Bennett K. HatfieldName:
Bennett K. HatfieldTitle:
President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





/s/ Bradley W. HarrisName:
Bradley W. HarrisTitle:
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)





Date: November 8, 2010





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### § 1230.604 Department.

The term *Department* means the United States Department of Agriculture.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry Stevenson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 13th day of August, 2009.   /s/ Garry Stevenson ------------------------------ Chief Financial Officer
October 18, 1979.

Appeal No. 78-200.

#### Dorothy M. Seebeck *v.*Rowe Automatic Sales, Inc.

*Lawrence L. Goldberg, Robert D. Goldberg,*for appellant. *Robert C. Hogan, Inc., Robert C. Hogan,*for appellee.

This case came before us in response to our order to the employee to show cause why her appeal should not be dismissed.

After considering the briefs filed in the case and the oral arguments presented, we are of the opinion that the employee has failed to show cause in view of our holding in *Kyle*v. *Davol,*121 R.I. 79, 395 A.2d 714 (1978), and in light of the fact that the Workers Commission’s factual findings are binding if supported by legally competent evidence. *Leahey*v. *State,*121 R.I. 200, 397 A.2d 509 (1979); *Leviton Mfg. Co.*v. *Lillibridge,*120 R.I. 283, 387 A.2d 1034 (1978).

Consequently, the appeal is denied and dismissed.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Report: Characteristics of Private Schools in the United States: Results from the 2015–16 Private School Universe Survey

This report provides select findings from the 2015–16 Private School Universe Survey to describe school size, school level, religious orientation, association membership, geographic region, community type, and program emphasis. 

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017073&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Report
#### *Freeman and Ewell*vs. *Patton.*

Motion.

Case 43.

Writ of error to the Knox circuit ¡ Joseph Eve, Judge.

*Execution. Replevy bond. ¿Appeal.*

April 13.

Question stated.

Not error to issue an execution within the time given to execute an appeal bond.

Granting an appeal does not, *ipso facto,*suspend a judgment or decree; executing the bond does.

Optional with the party praying an appeal, to execute bond os *194abandon his appeal.

*193Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The only point made in this case, which is entitled to any consideration, is, whether an execution and replevin bond, be quashable, because the execution issued before the expiration of twenty days, allowed for an appeal bond to be given, in an appeal granted, to the judgment on which the execution emanated? No decision has ever been given directly on this subject. Ahd Wé must therefore dispose of it according to what we ctínsideí the reasoti'of'the case.

Although it is unreasonable to issue an execution Oh a judgment, from which ah appeal has been prayed, until it shall have been ascertained, that it is not to be prosecuted, it Would hot be'erroneous to do so. Generally it is prudent not to do it; because, if the appeal shall take'effect by the execution of bond, the execution would thereby be suspended at the Cost of the creditors.

But praying an appeal, does not *ipso facto,*suspend the judgment or prevent any proceeding for its enforcement. Granting’an injunction or condition that bond .and security shall be given, does not enjoin the judgment, and execution may issue on it, until the injunction shall take effect by the execution of th'e bond. The analogy seems to be strong between thetWo classes of cases-.

If the appellant or'complainani in the injunction, desire to prevent an execution, he may do so, by promptly giving the bond required. Whenever lie shall do this, the opposite party is restrained. But if he supinely delay, he cannot complain that his adversary has by greater vigilance attended to his interest, and chosen to run the hazard of paying cost on process that may at any moment be arrested.

In this case, the appeal has never been taken. It was prayed; and allowed on Condition that bond should be given in twenty days. By giving the bond, the appeal would “eo *inslanii-f*án’d not before, be effectual. *194It was optional with the party praying it,; to give it effect or not. He has chosen to abandon it, and to replevy the judgment for two years. He should not now be permitted to profit by his own delinquency,- and postpone and harrass bis creditor. If he were sustained in this attempt, artifice and unjust delays would be encouraged.

Triplett, for plaintiff; Wickliffe, for defendant.

If however the law were in his favor, we should be" compelled so to decide. But believing that it is not, we, with the more confidence, decide against him, because' such a decision accords with justice and sound policy.

The other errors assigned, contain no good objection to the decision of the court below, and are obviously not sustainable.

Wherefore, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
#### Firelands Sewer and Water Construction Co., Inc., et al., Respondents, v Rochester Pure Waters District, Monroe County, et al., Appellants.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons stated at Special Term (Livingston, J.). (See *Matter of Ballard Constr. v Ross,*63 AD2d 99; *Matter of Expert Elec, v Goldin,*51 AD2d 763.) We reject respondents-appellants’ argument that chapter 336 of the Laws of 1978, amending section 220 of the Labor Law, should be applied retroactively. Any suggestion that the Legislature intended that the amend*814ment be so applied is negated by section 4 of chapter 336 which states that the amendment "shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.” (See *Matter of Deutsch v Catherwood,*31 NY2d 487; *Matter of Ayman v Teachers’ Retirement Bd. of City of N. Y.,*9 NY2d 119.) (Appeals from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court — article 78.) Present— Moule, J. P., Simons, Dillon, Hancock,. Jr., and Schnepp, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBig-bang nucleosynthesis revisitedThe homogeneous big-bang nucleosynthesis yields of D, He-3, He-4, and Li-7 are computed taking into account recent measurements of the neutron mean-life as well as updates of several nuclear reaction rates which primarily affect the production of Li-7. The extraction of primordial abundances from observation and the likelihood that the primordial mass fraction of He-4, Y(sub p) is less than or equal to 0.24 are discussed. Using the primordial abundances of D + He-3 and Li-7 we limit the baryon-to-photon ratio (eta in units of 10 exp -10) 2.6 less than or equal to eta(sub 10) less than or equal to 4.3; which we use to argue that baryons contribute between 0.02 and 0.11 to the critical energy density of the universe. An upper limit to Y(sub p) of 0.24 constrains the number of light neutrinos to N(sub nu) less than or equal to 3.4, in excellent agreement with the LEP and SLC collider results. We turn this argument around to show that the collider limit of 3 neutrino species can be used to bound the primordial abundance of He-4: 0.235 less than or equal to Y(sub p) less than or equal to 0.245.Document ID19900013110Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsOlive, Keith A.*(Minnesota Univ. Minneapolis., United States)*Schramm, David N.*(Chicago Univ. IL., United States)*Steigman, Gary*(Ohio State Univ. Columbus., United States)*Walker, Terry P.*(Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge, MA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1989Subject CategoryThermodynamics And Statistical PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186256NAS 1.26:186256FERMILAB-PUB-89/262-AUMN-TH-816/89CFA-89-2985Accession Number90N22426Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-1321CONTRACT_GRANT: NASG-931CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-1340CONTRACT_GRANT: DE-AC02-83ER-40105CONTRACT_GRANT: DE-AC02-76ER-01545CONTRACT_GRANT: NSF AST-88-20595Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013110.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 1.340 Stay pending appeal. ( a ) A decision is stayed automatically pending disposition of a motion for reconsideration or of an appeal to the judicial officer.
( b ) The respondent may file with the ALJ a request for stay of the effective date of a decision of the judicial officer pending judicial review. Such request shall state the grounds upon which respondent relies in requesting the stay, together with a copy of the notice(s) of appeal filed by respondent seeking review of a decision of the judicial officer. The filing of such a request shall automatically stay the effective date of the decision of the judicial officer until the ALJ rules upon the request.
( c ) The representative for the USDA may file an opposition to respondent's request for a stay within 10 days of receipt of the request. If the representative for the USDA fails to file such an opposition within the allotted time, or indicates that the USDA has no objection to the request, the ALJ may grant the stay without requiring respondent to give a bond or other security.
( d ) The ALJ may grant a contested request where justice so requires and to the extent necessary to prevent irreparable harm but only upon the respondent's giving of a bond or other adequate security. The ALJ shall rule promptly on a contested request for stay.
( e ) A decision of the ALJ denying respondent's request for a stay shall constitute final agency action.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Share with Youth: Where to Next? Exploring STEM Careers      

# Share with Youth: Where to Next? Exploring STEM Careers

This virtual game is designed to help high school students learn about different STEM careers as they think about their future after high school. Students will learn factors like the number of people in the U.S. working in STEM jobs, the median earnings of people in select STEM professions, and more.**Learn more.**
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Coupled Ocean General Circulation, Biogeochemical, and Radiative Model of the Global Oceans: Seasonal Distributions of Ocean Chlorophyll and NutrientsA coupled ocean general circulation, biogeochemical, and radiative model was constructed to evaluate and understand the nature of seasonal variability of chlorophyll and nutrients in the global oceans. Biogeochemical processes in the model are determined from the influences of circulation and turbulence dynamics, irradiance availability. and the interactions among three functional phytoplankton groups (diatoms. chlorophytes, and picoplankton) and three nutrients (nitrate, ammonium, and silicate). Basin scale (greater than 1000 km) model chlorophyll results are in overall agreement with CZCS pigments in many global regions. Seasonal variability observed in the CZCS is also represented in the model. Synoptic scale (100-1000 km) comparisons of imagery are generally in conformance although occasional departures are apparent. Model nitrate distributions agree with in situ data, including seasonal dynamics, except for the equatorial Atlantic. The overall agreement of the model with satellite and in situ data sources indicates that the model dynamics offer a reasonably realistic simulation of phytoplankton and nutrient dynamics on synoptic scales. This is especially true given that initial conditions are homogenous chlorophyll fields. The success of the model in producing a reasonable representation of chlorophyll and nutrient distributions and seasonal variability in the global oceans is attributed to the application of a generalized, processes-driven approach as opposed to regional parameterization and the existence of multiple phytoplankton groups with different physiological and physical properties. These factors enable the model to simultaneously represent many aspects of the great diversity of physical, biological, chemical, and radiative environments encountered in the global oceans.Document ID20000112962Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGregg, Watson W.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Busalacchi, AntonioDate AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 2000Subject CategoryOceanographyReport/Patent NumberRept-2000-03905-0NAS 1.15:209965NASA/TM-2000-209965Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000112962.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 133 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 133

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the use of 
the national coverage determination process under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

 Mr. Buchanan (for himself, Ms. Barragan, and Ms. Salazar) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
  Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the use of 
the national coverage determination process under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mandating Exclusive Review of 
Individual Treatments (MERIT) Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION ON MEDICARE NATIONAL COVERAGE DETERMINATION 
              PROCESS.

    Section 1862(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``For purposes 
of paragraph (1)(E), in the case of research conducted pursuant to 
section 1142, the determination of whether a drug or biological is 
reasonable and necessary to carry out the purposes of section 1142 
shall be made with respect to each drug or biological involved and not 
with respect to a class of drugs or biologicals.''.
                                 <all>
```