alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1205.335 Assessments. ( a ) Each cotton producer or other person for whom cotton is being handled shall pay to the handler thereof designated by the Cotton Board pursuant to regulations issued by the Secretary and such handler shall collect from the producer or other person for whom the cotton, including cotton owned by the handler, is being handled, and shall pay to the Cotton Board, at such times and in such manner as prescribed by regulations issued by the Secretary, assessments as prescribed in paragraphs (a) (1) and (2) of this section: ( 1 ) An assessment at the rate of $1 per bale of cotton handled;
( 2 ) A supplemental assessment on cotton handled which shall not exceed one percent of the value of such cotton as determined by the Cotton Board and approved by the Secretary and published in the Cotton Board rules and regulations. The rate of the supplemental assessment may be increased or decreased by the Cotton Board with the approval of the Secretary. The Secretary shall prescribe by regulation whether the assessment rate shall be levied on: ( i ) The current value of the cotton, or
( ii ) An average value determined from current and/or historical cotton prices and converted to a fixed amount for each bale.
( b ) Each importer of cotton shall pay to the Cotton Board through the U.S. Customs Service, or in such other manner and at such times as prescribed by regulations issued by the Secretary, assessments as prescribed in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section: ( 1 ) An assessment of $1 per bale of cotton imported or the bale equivalent thereof for cotton products.
( 2 ) A supplemental assessment on each bale of cotton imported, or the bale equivalent thereof for cotton products, which shall not exceed one percent of the value of such cotton as determined by the Cotton Board and approved by the Secretary and published in the Cotton Board rules and regulations. The rate of the supplemental assessment on imported cotton shall be the same as that paid on cotton produced in the United States. The rate of the supplemental assessment may be increased or decreased by the Cotton Board with the approval of the Secretary. The Secretary shall prescribe by regulation the value of imported cotton based on an average of current and/or historical cotton prices.
( c ) The Secretary may designate by regulation exemptions to assessments provided for in this section for the following: ( 1 ) Entries of products designated by specific Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers which the Secretary determines are composed of U.S. cotton or other than Upland cotton, and for;
( 2 ) Cotton contained in entries of imported cotton and cotton products that is U.S. produced cotton or is other than Upland cotton.
( d ) Assessments collected under this section are to be used for such expenses and expenditures, including provision for a reasonable reserve, as the Secretary finds reasonable and likely to be incurred by the Cotton Board and the Secretary under this subpart.
[56 FR 64473, Dec. 10, 1991]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: State Survey Analysis      

# Resource: State Survey Analysis

This infographic (PDF, 4 pages) shares an analysis of a 2021 survey distributed by the Children’s Bureau’s Quality Improvement Center on Engaging Youth in Finding Permanency (QIC-EY) on how youth engagement is supported by child welfare systems across the nation. Descriptions of findings from 24 states are presented in a Q&A. **Learn more** (PDF, 4 pages).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLow-energy gamma ray attenuation characteristics of aviation fuelsAm241 (59.5 keV) gamma ray attenuation characteristics were investigated in 270 aviation fuel (Jet A and Jet A-1) samples from 76 airports around the world as a part of world wide study to measure the variability of aviation fuel properties as a function of season and geographical origin. All measurements were made at room temperature which varied from 20 to 27 C. Fuel densities (rho) were measured concurrently with their linear attenuation coefficients (mu), thus providing a measure of mass attenuation coefficient (mu/rho) for the test samples. In 43 fuel samples, rho and mu values were measured at more than one room temperature, thus providing mu/rho values for them at several temperatures. The results were found to be independent of the temperature at which mu and rho values were measured. It is noted that whereas the individual mu and rho values vary considerably from airport to airport as well as season to season, the mu/rho values for all samples are constant at 0.1843 + or - 0.0013 cu cm/gm. This constancy of mu/rho value for aviation fuels is significant since a nuclear fuel quantity gauging system based on low energy gamma ray attenuation will be viable throughout the world.Document ID19900009566Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsSingh, Jag J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Shen, Chih-Ping*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA., United States)*Sprinkle, Danny R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberL-16719NAS 1.60:2974NASA-TP-2974Accession Number90N18882Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 141-20-10-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900009566.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 29, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 29, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18A1610. OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. JUSTIN DEAN BAXLEY.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB/A
American Ammunition, Inc.
File No. 0-32379


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  American  Ammunition,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form  10-KSB/A for the year ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Andres F.  Fernandez,  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: bctober 19, 2007              /s/ Andres F. Fernandez
       ------------------            ------------------------------------
                                     Andres F. Fernandez
                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                     Chief Financial Officer



-----------------------
A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  American  Ammunition,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  American
Ammunition,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

KYLE DANA MISSOURI, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


### ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE No. 62213 

# FILED APR 0 9 2013
TRACIE K. LINDEMAN CL.9P2M14EURT DEPUTY CLERK IY 11Y.T.LIZ
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of attempted invasion of the home. Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Michael Montero, Judge.

Appellant Kyle Dana Missouri claims that the district court abused its discretion at sentencing by imposing a prison term rather than placing him on probation. The district court imposed a prison term of 12 to 36 months after hearing that Missouri, a young man, had already served 10 prior jail terms for other offenses. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, see NRS 176A.100(1)(c); NRS 193.130(2)(c); NRS 193.330(1)(a)(3); NRS 205.067(2); 

### Houk v. State, 103

-16b 4.0 111 ' vi'liVii1-7',::',:_
- . S.,!:-It.wleBitwax -

rikkzeredicansminegissaum

_ailirM.M5 4N: -;...:SkIregREM RM Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987), and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED."



## Ac,t ,J

cc: Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge Humboldt County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Humboldt County District Attorney Humboldt County Clerk

'Missouri's fast track statement does not comply with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because it does not have margins of at least one inch on all four sides. We caution appellant's counsel, Matt Stermitz, that future failure to comply with the applicable rules when filing briefs in this court may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2
179 So. 297

#### STATE v. FESTERVAND.

No. 34694.

Feb. 7, 1938.

Henry Turner, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James U. Galloway, Dist. Atty., and John R. Pleasant, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Shreveport, for the State.

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The defendant is appealing from a conviction and sentence for the crime of grand larceny, and for being a second offender. There is no hill of exception nor assignment of error, and no error apparent on the face of the record; hence no ground for the defendant’s asking for an annulment of the conviction or sentence.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1421.303 Time and method for application. ( a ) Application for the program provided in this subpart must be received, at the FSA county office that is responsible for administering programs for the farm, no earlier than the date on which eligible crops would normally be harvested and no later than the final loan availability date as determined in accordance with § 1421.5.
( b ) The application must describe the land to be grazed and, in accordance with standards set by CCC, the tract or field location.
( c ) The COC will determine the first harvest date, taking into account the date on which such crops are normally harvested locally for any purpose.
( d ) Where multiple producers are involved, the application must specify each producer's share in the crop. ( 1 ) A producer may only receive payments under this subpart that are commensurate with that producer's share in the crop as specified on the application.
( 2 ) Should a person who is entitled to receive a payment under this subpart die, that payment, as earned, may be made to other persons as provided for in the rules specified in part 707 of this title.
( 3 ) Third parties may also receive payments to the extent provided for in part 707 of this title for other situations involving an incapacitation of the producer.
( e ) Refusals to allow CCC to verify information on any application or report used for this subpart can result in program ineligibility and producers must provide CCC, FSA, and its agent access to the property involved and to all records as may be relevant to the making of payments under this subpart.
( f ) False statements will disqualify the producer from the program and may be subject to other sanctions including criminal sanctions.
[80 FR 127, Jan. 2, 2015]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Youth Partnership: A Call to Action for State Advisory Groups (SAGs)      

# Youth Partnership: A Call to Action for State Advisory Groups (SAGs)

This guide (PDF, 19 pages) focuses on ways that state advisory groups (SAGs) can build new partnerships with youth, further develop existing relationships with youth, and ensure youth voices are being heard. The guide provides action steps that SAGs can take to engage youth in areas such as recruitment, onboarding, and retention. **Learn more**(PDF, 19 pages).
#### Arlene Goldstein, Respondent, v Daniel H. Kamen, Appellant.

In a medical malpractice action, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 13, 1979, as, upon granting his motion to compel plaintiff to comply with his notice for discovery and inspection, limited the production of certain records by stating that "Paragraph V, set forth in pages 1 and 2 of the long island jewish-hillside medical center records be and the same is to be deleted therefrom”. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, the third decretal paragraph is deleted therefrom and it is directed that the portion of the hospital record in question be subject to discovery and inspection. Since the action is based upon a claim of personal injury arising out of medical malpractice, there is no doctor-patient privilege (see *Koump v Smith,*25 NY2d 287; *Prink v Rockefeller Center,*48 NY2d 309). Moreover, there is relevant matter contained in the portion of the hospital record deleted by Special Term. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Rabin, Gulotta and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
603.804 Policy ( b ) The contracting officer shall forward a copy of all contractor disclosures furnished pursuant to the clause at FAR 52.203-12 to the Office of the Legal Adviser, Employment Law, Senior Ethics Counsel (L/EMP/Ethics).
[69 FR 19331, Apr. 13, 2004]
I, JenniferR. Kloehn, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this reporton Form N-Q of Nicholas Fund, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, theschedules of investments included in this report fairly present in all materialrespects the investments of the registrant as of the end of the fiscal quarterfor which the report is filed;

 

4. The registrant's othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under theInvestment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financialreporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior tothe filing date of this report, based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant's othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, andreport financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting.

 

| Date: 02/19/2019 | /s/ Jennifer R. Kloehn      |
|------------------|-----------------------------|
|             | Jennifer R. Kloehn          |
|             | Principal Financial Officer |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        See                         **Supplementary Information**                         section for effective date(s).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OFAC: Bradley Smith, Acting Director, tel.: 202-622-2480; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *www.treasury.gov/​ofac*).                

## Notice of OFAC Action

On March 2, 2021, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.
      ( print page 13610)          ( print page 13611)    

Dated: March 2, 2021.

Bradley Smith,

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2021-04783 Filed 3-8-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C