1 

### Summary of EPA’s Additional Visibility Improvement Modeling

EPA 

### performed additional modeling of NOx control scena rios for both BART and

reasonable progress sources. For baseline emissio ns, the BART Guidelines recommend that

states use the maximum 24-hour average actual emission rate for the meteorological period being

modeled. The visibility modeling performed by Paci fiCorp, and subsequently submitted by the

state, deviates from this guidance by using the per mit limit emission rates and maximum rated

heat input to derive the modeled emission rates ins tead of the actual maximum 24-hou r average.

The visibility modeling performed by Basin Electric , and subsequently submitted by the state, also

deviates from this guidance by using a baseline hou rly emission rates derived from actual annual avera ge

heat input (MMBtu) and actual annual average emissi on rates (lb/MMBtu) from 2001-2003 continuous

emissions monitoring (CEM) data. For consistency, EPA’s 

### additional modeling to ascertain visibility

improvements from individual NOx controls used the state’s baseline emission rates for the

Pacificorp sites and Basin Electric’s Laramie River Station. All other aspects of EPA’s additional

visibility modeling followed the recommendations ma de in the BART Guidelines



### .

The tables beginning on page 4 show the CALPUFF inputs used for each unit modeled.

EPA’s modeling modified the state of Wyoming’s inpu ts in order to isolate the impact of

different NOx control scenarios. As seen in the ta bles, the NOx emission rates were varied

across the different scenarios with the other input parameters held constant. For the Pacificorp

and Basin Electric BART sources, the inputs were de rived from the state of Wyoming’s BART

Application Analyses that can be downloaded from th e following website:

http://deq.state.wy.us/aqd/309(g)%20Attachment%20A_ January%202011%20Submittal.asp

EPA’s modeling utilized the emission and stack para meter CALPUFF inputs from “Post-Control

Scenario A” in the reports for its Scenarios 1-3 wi th the only difference between scenarios being

the emission rate for NOx and, in the SCR scenarios , total sulfate rates were increased to account2



### for the additional production that results from SCR controls. EPA’s “New Baseline” is

essentially the state’s “Post-Control Scenario A” b ut with the NOx emission rate from their

“Baseline” scenario. Table 1 summarizes the contro l scenarios from EPA’s additional modeling

for BART sources.

Table 1- Description of EPA control scenarios for W yoming’s BART sources

EPA Scenario Description

New Baseline Post-Control Scenario A from state‘s B ART Application Analysis with NOx

emission rate from state’s “Baseline” scenario

Scenario 1 Post-Control Scenario A from state’s BAR T Application Analysis with NOx

emission rate that reflects the visibility improvem ent from LNB/OFA controls.

Scenario 2 Post-Control Scenario A from state’s BAR T Application Analysis with NOx

emission rate that reflects the visibility improvem ent from SNCR controls

Scenario 3 Post-Control Scenario A from state’s BAR T Application Analysis with NOx

emission rate that reflects the visibility improvem ent from SCR controls

EPA also performed additional modeling for Dave Joh nston’s Units 1 and 2. These are

considered reasonable progress sources and were not part of the state’s BART Application

Analyses. EPA followed a similar approach for mode ling these sources as used for the BART

sources. Permit limit emission rates with heat inp ut were used to derive emission inputs in the

“New Baseline” scenario. Similar to the BART sourc es, the only differences in the control

scenarios are the emission rates for NOx and, in th e SCR scenario (Scenario 3), total sulfate rates

were increased to account for the additional produc tion that results from SCR controls. Stack

parameter data for these sources was obtained from the Western Region Air Partnership’s

(WRAP) 2002 SMOKE input files. Table 2 summarizes the control scenarios for EPA’s

reasonable progress source modeling.3



### Table 2 – Description of EPA control scenarios for Reasonable Progress sources (Dave

Johnston Units 1 and 2)

EPA Scenario Description

New Baseline Inputs obtained from facility’s Title V Operating Permit limits

Scenario 0 Same inputs as New Baseline with a NOx e mission rate that reflect visibility

improvements from LNB controls

Scenario 1 Same inputs as New Baseline with a NOx e mission rate that reflect visibility

improvements from LNB/OFA controls

Scenario 2 Same inputs as New Baseline with a NOx e mission rate that reflect visibility

improvements from SNCR controls

Scenario 3 Same inputs as New Baseline with a NOx e mission rate that reflect visibility

improvements from SCR controls4

Pacificorp - Dave Johnston Unit 3

New Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/hour) 2800 2800 2800 2800

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.7 0.28 0.19 0.07

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (lb/hr) 420 420 420 420

Total Sulfate (SO4)(lb/hr) 2.5 2.5 2.5 5.1

Nox (lb/hr) 1960 784 532 196

HNO3 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(lb/hr) 23.9 23.9 23.9 23.9

PM2.5 (lb/hr) 18.1 18.1 18.1 18.1

Stack Height (meters) 152.4 152.4 152.4 152.4

Base Elevation (meters) 1509 1509 1509 1509

Stack Diameter (meters) 4.57 4.57 4.57 4.57

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 348 348 348 348

Pacificorp - Dave Johnston Unit 4

New Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/hour) 4100 4100 4100 4100

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.4 0.15 0.12 0.07

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (lb/hr) 615 615 615 615

Total Sulfate (SO4)(lb/hr) 3.7 3.7 3.7 7.4

Nox (lb/hr) 1640 615 492 287

HNO3 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(lb/hr) 35.1 35.1 35.1 35.1

PM2.5 (lb/hr) 26.4 26.4 26.4 26.4

Stack Height (meters) 152 152 152 152

Base Elevation (meters) 1509 1509 1509 1509

Stack Diameter (meters) 5.79 5.79 5.79 5.79

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 25.7 25.7 25.7 25.7

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 350 350 350 3505

Pacificorp - Jim Bridger Unit 1

New Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/hour) 6000 6000 6000 6000

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.45 0.26 0.2 0.07

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (lb/hr) 900 900 900 900

Total Sulfate (SO4)(lb/hr) 54.1 54.1 54.1 108.1

Nox (lb/hr) 2700 1560 1200 420

HNO3 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(lb/hr) 77.4 77.4 77.4 77.4

PM2.5 (lb/hr) 102.6 102.6 102.6 102.6

Stack Height (meters) 152 152 152 152

Base Elevation (meters) 2036 2036 2036 2036

Stack Diameter (meters) 7.32 7.32 7.32 7.32

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 24.7 24.7 24.7 24.7

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 328 328 328 328

Pacificorp - Jim Bridger Unit 2

New Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/hour) 6000 6000 6000 6000

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.24 0.26 0.2 0.07

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (lb/hr) 900 900 900 900

Total Sulfate (SO4)(lb/hr) 54.1 54.1 54.1 108.1

Nox (lb/hr) 1440 1560 1200 420

HNO3 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(lb/hr) 77.4 77.4 77.4 77.4

PM2.5 (lb/hr) 102.6 102.6 102.6 102.6

Stack Height (meters) 152 152 152 152

Base Elevation (meters) 2036 2036 2036 2036

Stack Diameter (meters) 7.32 7.32 7.32 7.32

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 24.7 24.7 24.7 24.7

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 328 328 328 3286

Pacificorp - Jim Bridger Unit 4

New Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/hour) 6000 6000 6000 6000

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.45 0.26 0.2 0.07

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (lb/hr) 900 900 900 900

Total Sulfate (SO4)(lb/hr) 54.1 54.1 54.1 108.1

Nox (lb/hr) 2700 1560 1200 420

HNO3 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(lb/hr) 77.4 77.4 77.4 77.4

PM2.5 (lb/hr) 102.6 102.6 102.6 102.6

Stack Height (meters) 152 152 152 152

Base Elevation (meters) 2033 2033 2033 2033

Stack Diameter (meters) 9.45 9.45 9.45 9.45

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 12.9 12.9 12.9 12.9

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 322 322 322 322

Pacificorp - Naughton Unit 1

New Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/hour) 1850 1850 1850 1850

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.58 0.26 0.21 0.07

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (lb/hr) 278 278 278 278

Total Sulfate (SO4)(lb/hr) 16.7 16.7 16.7 33.3

Nox (lb/hr) 1073 481 389 130

HNO3 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(lb/hr) 33.4 33.4 33.4 33.4

PM2.5 (lb/hr) 44.3 44.3 44.3 44.3

Stack Height (meters) 145 145 145 145

Base Elevation (meters) 2115 2115 2115 2115

Stack Diameter (meters) 4.88 4.88 4.88 4.88

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 18.1 18.1 18.1 18.17 Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 323 323 323 323

Pacificorp - Naughton Unit 2

New Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/hour) 2400 2400 2400 2400

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.54 0.26 0.21 0.07

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (lb/hr) 360 360 360 360

Total Sulfate (SO4)(lb/hr) 21.6 21.6 21.6 43.2

Nox (lb/hr) 1296 624 504 168

HNO3 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(lb/hr) 55.7 55.7 55.7 55.7

PM2.5 (lb/hr) 73.9 73.9 73.9 73.9

Stack Height (meters) 145 145 145 145

Base Elevation (meters) 2115 2115 2115 2115

Stack Diameter (meters) 5.49 5.49 5.49 5.49

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 323 323 323 323

Pacificorp - Naughton Unit 3

New Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/hour) 3700 3700 3700 3700

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.45 0.37 0.3 0.07

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (lb/hr) 814 814 814 814

Total Sulfate (SO4)(lb/hr) 33.3 33.3 33.3 66.6

Nox (lb/hr) 1665 1369 1110 259

HNO3 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(lb/hr) 23.9 23.9 23.9 23.9

PM2.5 (lb/hr) 31.6 31.6 31.6 31.6

Stack Height (meters) 145 145 145 145

Base Elevation (meters) 2113 2113 2113 21138 Stack Diameter (meters) 8.08 8.08 8.08 8.08

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 20.2 20.2 20.2 20.2

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 322 322 322 322

Basin Electric – Laramie River Station Unit 1

New Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/year) 46814433 46814433 46814433 46814433

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.27 0.23 0.12 0.07

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (tpy) 3745 3745 3745 3745

Total Sulfate (SO4)(tpy) 3.06 3.18 3.18 3.18

Nox (tpy) 6320 5384 2809 1639

HNO3 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(tpy) 0 0 0 0

PM2.5 (tpy) 702 702 702 702

Stack Height (meters) 184.404 184.404 184.404 184.404

Base Elevation (meters) 1348 1348 1348 1348

Stack Diameter (meters) 8.6868 8.6868 8.6868 8.6868

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 21.336 21.336 21.336 21.336

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 338.7056 338.7056 338.7056 338.7056

Basin Electric – Laramie River Station Unit 2

New Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/year) 46557738 46557738 46557738 46557738

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.27 0.23 0.12 0.07

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (tpy) 3725 3725 3725 3725

Total Sulfate (SO4)(tpy) 2.8 3.25 3.25 3.25

Nox (tpy) 6285 5354 2793 1630

HNO3 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(tpy) 0 0 0 0

PM2.5 (tpy) 698 698 698 6989 Stack Height (meters) 184.404 184.404 184.404 184.404

Base Elevation (meters) 1348 1348 1348 1348

Stack Diameter (meters) 8.6868 8.6868 8.6868 8.6868

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 21.03 21.03 21.03 21.03

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 338.7056 338.7056 338.7056 338.7056

Basin Electric – Laramie River Station Unit 3

New Baseline Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/year) 47765529 47765529 47765529 47765529

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.27 0.23 0.12 0.07

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (tpy) 4060 4060 4060 4060

Total Sulfate (SO4)(tpy) 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22

Nox (tpy) 6448 5493 2866 1672

HNO3 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(tpy) 0 0 0 0

PM2.5 (tpy) 716 716 716 716

Stack Height (meters) 184.404 184.404 184.404 184.404

Base Elevation (meters) 1348 1348 1348 1348

Stack Diameter (meters) 8.6868 8.6868 8.6868 8.6868

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 22.25 22.25 22.25 22.25

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 352.0 352.0 352.0 352.010



### Reasonable Progress Sources

Dave Johnston Unit 1

New

Baseline Scenario

0 Scenario

1 Scenario

2 Scenario

3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/hour) 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.75 0.3675 0.2625 0.45 0.15

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (lb/hr) 1620 1620 1620 1620 0

Total Sulfate (SO4)(lb/hr) 1 1 1 1 2

Nox (lb/hr) 1012.5 496.125 354.375 607.5 202.5

HNO3 0 0 0 0 0

NO3 0 0 0 0 0

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(lb/hr) 149.726 149.726 149.726 149.726 149.726

PM2.5 (lb/hr) 198.474 198.474 198.474 198.474 198.474

Stack Height (meters) 152.4 152.4 152.4 152.4 152.4

Base Elevation (meters) 1509 1509 1509 1509 1509

Stack Diameter (meters) 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 28.35 28.35 28.35 28.35 28.35

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 418.15 418.15 418.15 418.15 418.15

Dave Johnston Unit 2

New

Baseline Scenario

0 Scenario

1 Scenario

2 Scenario

3

Hourly Heat Input

(mmBtu/hour) 1350 1350 1350 1350 1350

Emission

Rates SO2 (lb/MMBtu) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2

Nox (lb/MMBtu) 0.75 0.3675 0.2625 0.45 0.15

Calpuff

Inputs SO2 (lb/hr) 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620

Total Sulfate (SO4)(lb/hr) 1 1 1 1 2

Nox (lb/hr) 1012.5 496.125 354.375 607.5 202.5

HNO3

NO3

PM10-2.5 (coarse PM)(lb/hr) 149.726 149.726 149.726 149.726 149.726

PM2.5 (lb/hr) 198.474 198.474 198.474 198.474 198.474

Stack Height (meters) 152.4 152.4 152.4 152.4 152.4

Base Elevation (meters) 1509 1509 1509 1509 1509

Stack Diameter (meters) 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35 3.35

Exit Velocity (meters/second) 28.69 28.69 28.69 28.69 28.69

Exit Temperature (Kelvin) 425.93 425.93 425.93 425.93 425.93