alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-09-285-E 

January 8, 2010 

 Exemption No. 9991 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0493 

Mr. Stuart B. Stavley 

Director of Maintenance 

Era Helicopters LLC 

P.O. Box 6550 

Lake Charles, LA 70606 

Dear Mr. Stavley: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letters dated May 22, 2009, June 10, 2009, and September 30, 2009, you petitioned the 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Era Helicopters, LLC (ERA) for an 

exemption from § 135.175(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent 

necessary to allow ERA to operate a large, transport category aircraft in passenger carrying 

configuration without airborne weather radar equipment installed in the aircraft, for the 

purpose of forestry fire suppression missions in the Western United States. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent setting exemption. 

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 7456 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that the petitioner failed to show how its proposed exemption would provide a level of 

safety equivalent to the affected section or how it would be in the public interest. The FAA 

was not persuaded that limiting the proposed operations to daylight only and under visual 

flight rules conditions provides an adequate level of safety equivalent to that of § 135.175(a), 

or to the level of safety maintained for operations previously exempted. The FAA also found 
2 

that the petitioner has failed to show how it is unique from the general class of regulated 

person so as to justify relief by way of an exemption, rather than by the general rulemaking 

process. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial 

of exemption; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby deny your petition on behalf of ERA Helicopters, LLC for an 

exemption from 14 CFR 135.175(a). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure 
3 

Project No.: AFS-09-285-E 

Project Officer: Edwin Miller 

ARM-107: LBrunache: 10/02/09: Doc#29278 

ARM-1/100/107: AFS-200/250 

Page: 3 

 Statistics: ERA Summary Denial.doc, 498 words 

 Original, 01 Oct 2009 09:09 

 Style Index 40 Good for a Regulation 

 Average Sentence Length 29 Poor

 Passive Index 8 Excellent

STUART B. STAVELY 

DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE 

ERA HELICOPTERS LLC 

PO BOX 6550 

LAKE CHARLES, LA 70606
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    ------


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT



                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 21, 1998


                       NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
              (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



New Jersey                   1-640                    13-5267260
(State or other       (Commission File No.)     (Employer ID No.)
jurisdiction of
incorporation)



16825 Northchase Dr., Suite 1200, Houston, Texas             77060
(Address of principal executive offices)                (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (281) 423-3300


                          Not Applicable
  (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



<PAGE>


Item 5.     Other Events.


      On , the Registrant  issued the press release  attached  hereto as Exhibit
99.1 and incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.




Item 7.     Financial   Statements,   Pro  Forma  Financial   Information  and
            Exhibits.


      (c)   Exhibits

            (i)   Exhibit 99.1.     Press Release dated October 21, 1998.



                        *      *      *      *      *




                                    SIGNATURE



      Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                          NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                          (Registrant)



                                          /s/ Dennis G. Newkirk
                                          Dennis G. Newkirk
                                          Vice President & Controller



Dated: October 22, 1998
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of 4C Controls Inc.
      on
      Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Olivier de Vergnies,
      Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to my knowledge that:





(1) 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      November 24, 2008




By:
            /s/
                Olivier de VergniesName:    Olivier
                de VergniesTitle:      Principal
                Executive Officer
#### § 1230.634 FSA county office report.

The FSA county office will notify the FSA State office of the results of the referendum. Each FSA county office will transmit the results of the referendum in its county to the FSA State office. Such report will include the information listed in § 1230.633. The results of the referendum in each county will be made available to the public, after the results of the referendum are announced by the Secretary. A copy of the report of results will be posted for 30 days in the FSA county office in a conspicuous place accessible to the public and a copy will be kept on file in the FSA county office for a period of at least 12 months after the referendum.
(December 18, 1964)

#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Mahar, Appellant, v. Hills Baking Company et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board disallowing his claim for compensation benefits on the ground that hie injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment. Claimant, a bakery foreman whose usual eight-hour workday at the plant began at 2:00 P.M., was injured in an early morning motor vehicle collision while en route from his home to his place of employment in his own automobile. It is the general rule that the risks of such travel are not risks of employment. *(Matter of De Voe*v. *New York State Rys.,*218 N. Y. 318.) The evidence adduced by claimant, which if credited by the board conceivably might have brought the claim within the ambit of compensability as an exception to the general rule, was sharply contradicted by the proof of the employer and presented only a question of credibility for resolution by the board. *(Matter of Manolakis*v. *Edison S. S. Corp.,*15 A D 2d 845.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.
ex10_6.htm













	
Base Salaries of Executive Officers of the Registrant

	
Exhibit 10.6









 


As of March 1, 2013, the following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) of the executive officers of Old Point Financial Corporation:








	
Robert F. Shuford, Sr.

	 	$	300,000	 
	
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer

	 	 	 	 
	
Old Point Financial Corporation

	 	 	 	 
	  	 	 	 	 
	
Louis G. Morris

	 	$	300,000	 
	
Executive Vice President/OPNB

	 	 	 	 
	
Old Point Financial Corporation

	 	 	 	 
	  	 	 	 	 
	
Robert F. Shuford, Jr.

	 	$	230,000	 
	
Senior Vice President/Operations

	 	 	 	 
	
Old Point Financial Corporation

	 	 	 	 
	  	 	 	 	 
	
Joseph R. Witt

	 	$	227,000	 
	
Senior Vice President/Corporate Banking

	 	 	 	 
	
Old Point Financial Corporation

	 	 	 	 
	  	 	 	 	 
	
Melissa L. Burroughs

	 	$	180,290	 
	
Senior Vice President/Lending & Business Development

	 	 	 	 
	
Old Point Financial Corporation

	 	 	 	 
	  	 	 	 	 
	
Laurie D. Grabow

	 	$	181,000	 
	
Chief Financial Officer & Senior Vice President/Finance

	 	 	 	 
	
Old Point Financial Corporation

	 	 	 	 
	  	 	 	 	 
	
Eugene M. Jordan, II

	 	$	168,129	 
	
Executive Vice President/Trust

	 	 	 	 
	
Old Point Financial Corporation
#### § 1030.8 Nonpool plant.

See § 1000.8.
#### Christina Pearson, appellee, v. Ridgewood Cemetery Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,485.

Opinion filed January 2, 1930.

Rehearing denied and opinion slightly modified January 15, 1930.

Brundage, Landón & Holt, for appellant; Floyd E. Britton, of counsel. Thomas J. Finnegan, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Wilson

delivered the opinion of the court.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1427.161 Administration. ( a ) The Recourse Seed Cotton Loan Program that is applicable to a crop of cotton will be administered under the general supervision of the Executive Vice President, CCC, or a designee and will be carried out in the field by FSA State and county committees.
( b ) State and county committees, and representatives and employees thereof, do not have the authority to modify or waive any of the provisions of the regulations of this subpart.
( c ) The State committee will take any action required by these regulations which has not been taken by the county committee. The State committee will also: ( 1 ) Correct, or require a county committee to correct, an action taken by such county committee which is not under the regulations of this subpart; or
( 2 ) Require a county committee to withhold taking any action which is not under the regulations of this subpart.
( d ) No provision or delegation herein to a State or county committee will preclude the Executive Vice President, CCC (Administrator, FSA), or a designee from determining any question arising under the recourse seed cotton program or from reversing or modifying any determination made by the State or county committee.
( e ) The Deputy Administrator, FSA, may authorize waiver or modification of deadlines and other program requirements where lateness or failure to meet such other requirements does not adversely affect the operation of the recourse seed cotton loan program.
( f ) A representative of CCC may execute loan applications and related documents only under the terms and conditions determined and announced by CCC. Any such document which is not executed under such terms and conditions, including any purported execution before the date authorized by CCC, will be null and void.
[67 FR 64459, Oct. 18, 2002, as amended at 80 FR 136, 139, Jan. 2, 2015]
Exhibit 10.4(a)

 

	

    	
Sydling Futures Management LLC

1285 Avenue of the Americas, 13th Floor

New York, NY 10019
    


 

June 19, 2012

 

Anthony Annunziato

AAA Capital Management Advisors, LTD

1300 Post Oak Blvd

Suite 350

Houston, TX 77056

 

Re:                             AAA Energy Opportunities Fund LLC

Sydling AAA Master Fund LLC

 

Dear Mr. Annunziato:

 

The Trading Advisory Agreements (the “Agreements”) among the above named funds, Sydling Futures Management LLC and AAA Capital Management Advisors, Ltd. expire June 30, 2012.  Please accept this letter as a renewal of the Agreements and all terms for an additional twelve months to expire on June 30, 2013.

 

Please acknowledge this renewal by signing below and returning to my attention at jennifer.magro@ubs.com.

 

	
Best regards,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Jennifer Magro
    	
 
    
	
Jennifer Magro
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
ACKNOWLEDGED BY:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Gerard Trevino
    	
 
    
	
Signature
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Gerard   Trevino
    	
 
    
	
Print Name Chief Operating Officer
#### § 1209.16 Programs, plans, and projects.

*Programs, plans, and projects* means promotion, research, consumer information, and industry information plans, studies, projects, or programs conducted pursuant to this part.
#### § 1400.4 Indian Tribe.

Provisions of this part do not apply to Indian tribes as defined in § 1400.3.
GEORGIA
INTERNATIONAL MINING CORP.


Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Georgia International Mining Corp.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: 
      August
      14, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Mark
      HagueMark
      HagueChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer,
      Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 1033.52 Adjusted Class I differentials.

See § 1000.52.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Partnering for Nutrition in School Meals      

# Partnering for Nutrition in School Meals

A new TV feature developed by USDA describes the Team Up for Success Training Initiative, a program that connects schools that have succeeded in instituting the standards of the Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act with schools that are struggling with implementation. 

http://blogs.usda.gov/2014/09/18/team-up-for-success-usda-and-partners-help-secure-a-healthier-school-day/?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
#### Elizabeth Jensen, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Santa Casale et al., Respondents.

Gibson, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict of no cause of action, and from an order which denied a motion to set aside the verdict. Appellant, a passenger in an automobile operated by her husband, claims to have been injured when the automobile, while stopped for a traffic light, was struck in the rear by respondents’ ear, which, according to the respondent driver, had been proceeding at a speed of about 20 miles per hour on'a city street that was “very slippery” — the “road surface was all ice” — following the car in which appellant was riding by “a full car length, 15, 20 feet” until he saw the taillight of the car ahead light up, after which he “slapped on” his brakes and “slid” into- the car ahead, which he conceded was stopped in a line of traffic. Asked if he “ could * * * see the color of the traffic light ”, he said, “ I don’t remember. ■ From where I was on the street I could see the traffic light, but I don’t remember what color it was.” There is no claim that appellant was negligent. If the verdict implies a determination by the jury that respondents were not negligent, the finding was contrary to the weight of the evidence. Respondents urge, however, that the jury could have properly concluded that appellant sustained no injury, but such a finding would also be contrary to the weight of the evidence. Concededly, there was a collision. Appellant testified that she sustained abrasions and a bruise, among other injuries. The jury was not bound, perhaps, to believe her unsupported testimony, if they considered it impeachable when standing alone; but her attending physician testified, without objection, that appellant went from the accident to the hospital and called him from there and that “ a short time later ” he saw her at his office, where he found, among others, the visible injuries also described in appellant’s testimony, and these he related to the accident. His uncontradicted testimony was entitled to be given weight. What was held in a landmark case as fro the effect of the uncontradicted testimony of a party applies with at least equal force to the testimony of an expert witness; that is: “ Where * *' * the evidence of a party to the action is not contradicted by direct evidence, nor by any legitimate inferences from the evidence, and it is not opposed to the- probabilities; nor, in its nature, surprising, or suspicious, there is no reason for denying to it eonclusiveness.” *(Hull*v. *Littauer,*162 N. Y. 569, 572; Richardson, Evidence [9th ed.], § 123, pp. 95-96.) Defendants were, of course, entitled to prove that plaintiff had previously claimed iniuries caused by other accidents, but the protracted cross-examination of plaintiff’s husband, not as to such injuries, but as to litigation concerning *995them, was improper and may have unduly influenced the jury’s determination. Judgment and order reversed, on the Law and the facts, with costs to appellant, and a new trial ordered. Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 9, 2009
    By:
    /s/Christian B. RagotChristian B. RagotPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: School Employee Wellness      

# Resource: School Employee Wellness

This website contains resources to foster the physical and mental health of school employees, so that they can more effectively support students’ health and academic success. The site includes a tip sheet (PDF, 2 pages) to support the wellbeing of school employees, even in a remote environment.**Learn more.**