alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-1560

___________ Curtis James Maxwell, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Linn County Correctional Center, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 2, 2009 Filed: February 4, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action brought by Iowa inmate Curtis Maxwell (Maxwell) against the Linn County Corr ectional Center (LCCC), Maxwell appeals after the district court, citing the local rule s, dismissed his complaint for failure to file a timely resistance to LCCC’s motion to di smiss. We grant Maxwell’s renewed motion for leave to proceed in forma paupe ris on appeal and a ffirm on other grounds.
Maxwell brought this action seeking damages and injunctive relief after he allegedly fell from an upper bunk bed at L CCC. LCCC moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and the district court granted LCCC’s motion based on Maxwell’s failure to file a resistance within th e time limit specified by the local rules.-2- To the extent the district court dismi ssed the complaint on the merits based on Maxwell’s failure to file a timely resistance under the local rules, we conclude the district court abused its discretion. See Nw. Bank & Trust Co. v. First Ill. Nat’l Bank , 354 F.3d 721, 725 (8th Cir. 2003) (stating this court reviews for abuse of discretion the district court’s application of lo cal rules); Johnson v. Boyd-Richardson Co. , 650 F.2d 147, 149 (8th Cir. 1981) (concluding the failure to comply with the local rule requiring an opposition to a motion to dismiss to be filed within fi ve days “cannot be, standing alone, a ground sufficient to extinguish a claim on its merits” and the district court is free to consider the merits of a pending motion after the deadline for a response passes, but “[i]t remains the court’ s duty to inquire into the merits of the motion and to grant or deny it, as the cas e may be, in accordance with law and the relevant facts”). Nevertheless, we a ffirm the dismissal because we conclude Maxwell’s complaint failed to state a viable claim. See Phipps v. FDIC , 417 F.3d 1006, 1010 (8th Cir. 2005) (explaining a dismissal may be affirmed “on any basis supported by the record”); Owens v. Scott County Jail , 328 F.3d 1026, 1027 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam) (deciding “county jails are not legal entities amenable to suit”).
The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of NL Industries,  Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harold C. Simmons, Chief
Executive  Officer of the Company,  and I, Gregory M. Swalwell,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Harold C. Simmons
--------------------------
Harold C. Simmons
   Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Gregory M. Swalwell
--------------------------
Gregory M. Swalwell
   Chief Financial Officer


August 4, 2006


Note: The certification  the registrant  furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as
amended,  or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.  Registration
Statements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
shall not incorporate this exhibit by reference,  except as otherwise  expressly
stated in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1614 WILBERT V. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees, and UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER; DR. EDWARD WALSH, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00061) Submitted: November 21, 2007 Decided: January 8, 2008 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilbert V. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Susan A. Waddell, GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, PC, Salem, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Wilbert V. Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ P. 12(b)(6) motion in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Commonwealth of Va. , No. 3:06-cv-00061 (W.D. Va. May 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.02****CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-Q**I, Seth Halio, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Diamond Foods, Inc., certifyas follows: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended January 31, 2006 of Diamond Foods, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     By: /s/ Seth Halio  Name:  Seth Halio  Title: EVP and Chief Financial Officer  Date: March 9, 2006
NUMBER 13-17-00155-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JUAN CARLOS PERERA, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELEE.

On appeal from the 206th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER 

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Currently pending before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the 

appellate record and motion for extension of time to file a pro se brief. Appellant's 

counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and appellant has been unable to examine the 

record so that he can file a pro se brief. 
2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has 

the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before August 21, 2017, and it 

is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon which the 

appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a pro se brief is GRANTED. 

Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first made 

available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days 

thereafter to file its response, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed 

the 4th day of August, 2017.
§ 1222.102 Voting. ( a ) Each eligible domestic manufacturer and importer of paper and paper-based packaging shall be entitled to cast only one ballot in the referendum. However, each domestic manufacturer in a landlord/tenant relationship or a divided ownership arrangement involving totally independent entities cooperating only to manufacture paper and paper-based manufacturing, in which more than one of the parties is a domestic manufacturer or importer, shall be entitled to cast one ballot in the referendum covering only such domestic manufacturer or importer's share of ownership.
( b ) Proxy voting is not authorized, but an officer or employee of an eligible corporate manufacturer or importer, or an administrator, executor, or trustee of an eligible entity may cast a ballot on behalf of such entity. Any individual so voting in a referendum shall certify that such individual is an officer or employee of the eligible entity, or an administrator, executive, or trustee of an eligible entity and that such individual has the authority to take such action. Upon request of the referendum agent, the individual shall submit adequate evidence of such authority.
( c ) A single entity who manufactures and imports paper and paper-based manufacturing may cast one vote in the referendum.
( d ) All ballots are to be cast by mail or other means, as instructed by the Department.
FIRST
        VALLEY BANCORP, INC. FORM
        10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT
 MARCH
        31,
        2006





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First Valley Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
      L. Messier, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.











/s/Robert
                L. Messier, Jr.Robert
                L. Messier, Jr.President
                and CEO










The
      foregoing is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      is
      not being filed as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.









21
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 124 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide incentives for 

education on the risk of renal medullary carcinoma in individuals who 

are receiving medical assistance under such title and who have sickle 

cell disease. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. GREEN of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

incentives for education on the risk of renal medullary 

carcinoma in individuals who are receiving medical assistance under such title and who have sickle cell disease. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Byron Nash Renal 

5 Medullary Carcinoma Awareness Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 124 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVIDING INCENTIVES FOR EDUCATION ON RISK 

2 OF RENAL MEDULLARY CARCINOMA TO INDI3 VIDUALS WITH SICKLE CELL DISEASE UNDER 

4 MEDICAID. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1903(a)(3)(E)(ii) of the 

6 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(a)(3)(E)(ii)) is 

7 amended by inserting ‘‘, renal medullary carcinoma,’’ after 

8 ‘‘stroke’’ each place it appears. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to items and serv11 ices furnished on or after the date of the enactment of 

12 this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.01
 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  /s/ Steven M. NeilSteven M. NeilChief Financial and Administrative Officer
Date: May 27, 2010 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  /s/ Michael J. MendesMichael J. MendesChairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 27, 2010 These certifications accompany this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: How to Text Message Parents to Reduce Chronic Absence Using an Evidence-Based Approach      

# Resource: How to Text Message Parents to Reduce Chronic Absence Using an Evidence-Based Approach

This toolkit (PDF, 105 pages) provides background and actionable resources about how educators can text parents and caregivers as an effective strategy for reducing chronic absenteeism. The toolkit is designed to help district leaders and staff:  
                  -  Consider goals and priorities for using text messaging to communicate with parents about student absences.  
                  -  Understand the attendance data collection procedures and information technology (IT) infrastructure needed to implement a texting strategy.    
                  -  Consider whether the text messaging strategies used in the Parent Messaging Study are feasible to adopt and implement.   
                  -  Set up a text messaging system using the district’s student information system and (if appropriate) a short messaging service (SMS) vendor.  

**Learn more** (PDF, 105 pages).
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1430.110 Calculation of average feed cost and actual dairy production margins. ( a ) Payments are made to a participating dairy operation as specified in this subpart only when, for a consecutive 2-month period, the calculated average actual dairy production margin is below the coverage level in effect for the participating dairy operation. That margin will be calculated on a national basis and is the amount by which for the relevant consecutive 2-month period, the all milk price exceeds the average feed cost for dairy producers. All calculations will be made on a per cwt basis. The average actual dairy production margin calculation applies to all participating dairy operations. The calculations are not made on an operation by operation basis or on their marketings.
( b ) For calculating the national average feed cost that dairy operations use to produce a cwt of milk, the following three items will be added together: ( 1 ) The product determined by multiplying 1.0728 by the price of corn per bushel;
( 2 ) The product determined by multiplying 0.00735 by the price of soybean meal per ton; and
( 3 ) The product determined by multiplying 0.0137 by the price of alfalfa hay per ton.
( c ) To make those feed calculations, the Deputy Administrator on behalf of CCC will use the following full month data: ( 1 ) For corn, the full month price received by farmers during the month in the United States as reported in the monthly Agricultural Prices report by USDA NASS;
( 2 ) For soybean meal, the Central Illinois soybean meal price delivered by rail as reported in the USDA AMS Market News-Monthly; and
( 3 ) For alfalfa hay, the full month price received during the month by farmers in the United States for alfalfa hay as reported in the monthly Agricultural Prices report by USDA NASS.
( d ) The national average feed cost data for corn, soybean meal, and alfalfa hay used in the calculation of the national average feed cost to determine the actual dairy production margin for the relevant period, will be the data reported in the publication the following month. (For example, preliminary May prices for corn and soybean meal were reported in the May Agricultural Prices publication but full month May prices will be available in the June publication, and those will be the prices used).
( e ) The actual dairy production margin for each consecutive 2-month period, will be calculated by subtracting: ( 1 ) The average feed cost for that consecutive 2-month period, determined under paragraph (b) of this section; from
( 2 ) The all-milk price for that consecutive 2-month period.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                                   PROXY FORM

WIPRO LIMITED
Registered Office
Doddakannelli
Sarjapur Road
Bangalore- 560035

Reg. Folio No/Demat Account No________________________

I/We ___________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________ of
_________________________________________________________________________ in the
District of ____________________________________________________________________
being a member/members of the Company thereby appoint
________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________ of
_________________________________________________________________________ in the
District of _________________________________________________________________ as
my/our proxy to vote for me/us on my/our behalf at the 55th ANNUAL GENERAL
MEETING of the Company to be held on July 19 2001 and at any adjournment
thereof.

Signed this _____________________ day of ____________________ 2001      Affix

                                                                      One Rupee
                                                                       Revenue
                                                                        Stamp

NOTE: The proxy form must be deposited at the Registered Office of the Company
not later than 48 hours before the time of holding the Meeting.
________________________________________________________________________________
                                 WIPRO LIMITED
                                                                 ATTENDANCE SLIP

WIPRO LIMITED
Registered Office:
Doddakannelli
Sarjapur Road
BANGALORE 560 035

FIFTY FIFTH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING ON JULY 19, 2001

Reg. Folio No/Demat Account No. ________________________________________________

I certify that I am a registered shareholder/proxy for the registered
shareholder of the Company.

I hereby record my presence of the FIFTY FIFTH  ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of the
Company at____________________________________________________________ on


Member's/Proxy's name in BLOCK letters                Member's/Proxy's Signature