alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | Hotel Program with International Job Placement |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------|

| -   | 5-month including academic study, practical study, and English tranining |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | After graduation, students are guaranteed overseas job positions in the hotel industry |
|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | Minimum enrolment per class is 20 |
|---------------|-----------------------------------|

| -   | Tuition fee is RMB 16,000 per student |
|---------------|---------------------------------------|

| -   | CIBT’s share of revenue per student is RMB 9,800 (including course material, job placement, interview guidance) |
|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | Job placement fee is RMB 5,000 – 10,000 per student (depending on the country of the position) payable to job placement company |
|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Hotel Program with Local Job Placement |
|----------------|----------------------------------------|

| -   | 3-month academic study + 3 to 6-month paid internship |
|---------------|-------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | Minimum enrolment per class is 30 |
|---------------|-----------------------------------|

| -   | Tuition fee is RMB 7,000 per student |
|---------------|--------------------------------------|

| -   | CIBT’s share of revenue per student is RMB 3,500 (including course material, job placement, interview guidance) |
|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | Party A is responsible for admission interviews, course material and instructors, visa application and overseas job opportunities |
|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | Party B is responsible for recruitment, teaching facilities and admission interviews |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | Party A collects tuition fee and remit Party B’s share of revenue within 7 business days |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| -   | No expiration date |
|---------------|--------------------|
§ 1230.32 Conduct of election. If a State association selects nominees for appointment to the Delegate Body through an election, it shall be conducted in the following manner: ( a ) Elections shall be administered by the Board and the Board shall determine the timing of any elections.
( b ) Producers who are residents of that State may be named as candidates for election to be nominees for appointment to the Delegate Body: ( 1 ) By a nominating committee of producers in that State appointed by the Board; or
( 2 ) The number of pork producers in a State shall be determined by the Department based on the latest available Department information, which tabulates by State the number of farming operations with porcine animals.
( c ) To be eligible to vote in an election to nominate producer members from a State, a person must: ( 1 ) Be a producer who is a resident of that State;
( 2 ) Have paid all assessments due pursuant to this subpart; and
( 3 ) Not have demanded any refund of an assessment paid pursuant to this subpart in the period since the selection of the previous Delegate Body.
( d ) The Board shall cause notices of any election to be published at least one week prior to the election in a newspaper or newspapers of general circulation in that State, and in pork production and agricultural trade publications. The notices shall set forth the period of time and places for voting and such other information as the Board considers necessary.
( e ) The identity of any person who voted and the manner in which any person voted shall be kept confidential.
[51 FR 31903, Sept. 5, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 30245, Aug. 11, 1988]
§ 1400.208 Family members. ( a ) Notwithstanding the provisions of §§ 1400.201 through 1400.206, with respect to a farming operation conducted by persons, a majority of whom are family members, an adult family member who makes a significant contribution of active personal labor, active personal management, or a combination of active personal labor and active personal management will be considered to be actively engaged in farming if the adult family member meets the provisions in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) An adult family member who elects to be considered actively engaged in farming under this section must: ( 1 ) Have a share of the profits or losses from the farming operation commensurate with the person's contributions to the operation and
( 2 ) Make contributions to the farming operation that are at risk for a loss, with the level of risk being commensurate with the person's claimed share of the farming operation.
[73 FR 79273, Dec. 29, 2008, as amended at 85 FR 52039, Aug. 24, 2020]
### *The HONORABLE JAMES M. BURNS, United States Distric t

Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation . The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. ___________ No. 95-3734

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. David Anthony Waddle, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 9, 1996 Filed: July 17, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge. *

___________ BEAM, Circuit Judge. David Waddle purchased a 1995 Chrysler LHS in Columbus, Ohio. H e paid for it with an insufficient funds check in the amount of $29,718.40. He then drove the car to Iowa where he was arrested on an unrelated charge . Waddle was charged with possession of and interstate transportation of a stolen vehicle. A jury convicted him of both co unts. He was sentenced to thirty-five months in prison. Waddle appeals alleging t he district court erred in: (1) admitting 1 evidence of his prior convictions for forgery an d theft of a vehicle under false pretenses; (2) excluding evidence of his

### -2-

filing of a complaint against an FBI agent (theo rizing the FBI's treatment of him was somehow affected by that filing); (3) instructing the jury that the intention to pay for the vehicle at a later date was not a defense; an d (4) concluding at sentencing that the purchasing scheme evidenced more tha n minimal planning. Having reviewed the parties' briefs and submissions, we conclu de the district court's rulings were correct. Accordingly, w e affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jerome E. Mills, Appellant. Unisource Worldwide, Inc., Respondent; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 916]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 24, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a truck driver after it was discovered that, despite being advised that such conduct was not acceptable, he routinely took extended breaks. Inasmuch as “[r]efusal to obey an employer’s reasonable rules and continued lateness after sufficient warnings can constitute misconduct barring receipt of unemployment insurance benefits” *(Matter of Reichert*/Losco Group—Commissioner of Labor], 256 AD2d 709, 710 [1998]; *see Matter ofTucek [Commissioner of Labor],*254 AD2d 667, 668 [1998]), substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant’s employment was terminated due to disqualifying misconduct. Claimant’s assertion that his extended breaks were “reluctantly acceptable” to the employer presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see *Matter of Boyle [Sweeney],*247 AD2d 809, 809 [1998]; *Matter of Perkov [Sweeney],*231 AD2d 780, 780 [1996]). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

LORENA ORTEGA-MORA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-50373

D.C. No. 3:13-cr-1430-JLS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Janis Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 20, 2014** 

Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and ZOUHARY,***

District Judge.

FILED

NOV 26 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Jack Zouhary, United States District Judge, Northern

District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
Defendant-Appellant Lorena Ortega-Mora appeals her 51-month sentence for

illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and now affirm.

California Health & Safety Code § 11378 is divisible within the meaning of

Descamps v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2276 (2013), and therefore subject to the

modified categorical approach. See Padilla-Martinez v. Holder, 770 F.3d 825, 831 n.3

(9th Cir. 2014) (concluding Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11378 is divisible); see also

Coronado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 977 (9th Cir. 2014) (holding Cal. Health & Safety Code

§ 11377(a) is divisible). Accordingly, the district court did not err when it applied a 16-

level enhancement under Guideline § 2L1.2(b) for Ortega-Mora’s prior conviction for

possession of methamphetamine for sale.

AFFIRMED.

2
#### § 1207.311 Programs and projects.

*Programs* and *projects* mean those research, development, advertising or promotion programs or projects developed by the Board pursuant to § 1207.335.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Statement
      of Chief Financial Officer Furnished**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, Donald F. X. Lynch, is the Chief Financial Officer of United
      Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”).





This
      statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
      the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
      (the “Report”).





By
      execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
      knowledge:





A)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
                and





B)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
                Report.





This
      statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
      this
      statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement
      be
      deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to United Financial Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by United
      Financial Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.







May
                5, 2006
            
            /s/
                Donald F. X. LynchDated
            
            Donald
                F. X. LynchChief
                Financial Officer




21
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Promoting Positive Pathways to Adulthood: Pathways Transition Training Toolkit      

# Resource: Promoting Positive Pathways to Adulthood: Pathways Transition Training Toolkit

This toolkit includes 10 free training modules for service providers who work with youth and young adults, ages 14-29, who have mental health challenges, and their families. Developed by the Pathways Transition Training Partnership and the Research and Training Center for Pathways to Positive Futures, this training can enhance service providers’ skills to engage with young people, collaborate with families, and work with the agencies and systems in which young people are involved.

http://www.pathwaysrtc.pdx.edu/proj-pttp-toolkit?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links
§ 1400.5 Denial of program benefits. ( a ) All or any part of a payment otherwise due a person or legal entity on all farms in which the person or legal entity has an interest may be withheld or be required to be refunded if the person or legal entity fails to comply with the provisions of this part.
( b ) All or any part of a payment otherwise due a person or legal entity on all farms in which the person or legal entity has an interest may be withheld or be required to be refunded if the person or legal entity fails to comply with the provisions of this part and adopts or participates in adopting a scheme or device designed to evade this part, or that has the effect of evading this part. Examples of acts may include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Concealing information that affects the application of this part;
( 2 ) Submitting false or erroneous information; or
( 3 ) Creating a business arrangement using rental agreements and other arrangements to conceal the interest of a person or legal entity in a farm or farming operation for the purpose of obtaining program payments the person or legal entity would otherwise not be eligible to receive. Examples of business arrangements or acts include, but are not limited to the following: ( i ) No crops are grown or agricultural commodities produced by the represented operation;
( ii ) The represented operation has no appreciable assets;
( iii ) The only source of capital for the operation is the program payments; or
( iv ) The represented operation exists only for the receipt of program payments.
( c ) If the Deputy Administrator determines that a person or legal entity has adopted a scheme or device to evade, or that has the purpose of evading, the provisions of 7 U.S.C. 1308, 1308-1, or 1308-3, as amended, the person or legal entity will be ineligible to receive payments under the programs specified in § 1400.1 in the year the scheme or device was perpetrated or adopted and the succeeding year.
( d ) A person or legal entity that lies or perpetuates fraud, commits fraud, or participates in equally serious actions for the benefit of the person or legal entity, or the benefit of any other person or legal entity, to exceed the applicable limit on payments or the requirements of this part will be subject to a 5-year denial of all program benefits. Examples of equally serious actions include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Knowingly engaged in, or aided in the creation of a fraudulent document;
( 2 ) Failed to disclose material information relevant to the administration of the provisions of this part, or
( 3 ) Any other actions of a person or legal entity determined by the Deputy Administrator as designed or intended to circumvent the provisions of this subpart.
( e ) Program payments and benefits will be denied on pro-rata basis: ( 1 ) In accordance to the interest held by the person or legal entity in any other legal entity or joint operations and
( 2 ) To any person or legal entity that is a cash rent tenant on land owned or under control of a person or legal entity for which a determination of this section has been made.
[73 FR 79273, Dec. 29, 2008, as amended at 85 FR 52038, Aug. 24, 2020]
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07
- 15 - 00012 - CR
MARK HOFF , APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law Navarro County , Texas Trial Court No. C 35612 - CR , Honorable Amanda Doan Putman , Presiding



### February 13 , 2017 Concurring Opinion of Chief Justice Quinn Before QUINN , C.J. , and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE , JJ. I would overrule the first issue for the reason stated in the opinion of Justice Pirtle , and I would overrule the second issue for the following reason. Though I have concerns with whether the officer ’ s question was improper interrogation , I assume it to be so for purposes of this argument. My major concern involves the existence of harm even if the question and answer were inadmissible. Evidence other than appellant ’ s statement regarding his ingestion of methamphetamine illustrated that he attempted to hide , destroy or otherwise tamper2

with evidence of a crime. Officers located him in a bedroom. In that bedroom , they also found “ a little baggy with substance , methamphetamine , and a methamphetamine pipe and some prescription pills. ” Mor e importantly , one or more of them “ observed him . . . to ingest methamphetamine ” as they entered the bedroom. That resulted in appellant immediately being placed in custody because they realized he was eating evidence.

“ It is well established that th e improper admission of evidence does not constitute reversible error if the same facts are shown by other evidence which is not challenged. Kulhanek v. State , No. 13
- 15
- 00265
- CR , 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 12150 , at *10 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi
- Edinburg Nov. 10 , 2016 , no pet.) (mem. op. , not designated for publication) ( citing Leday v. State , 983 S.W.2d 713 , 717 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998)). While there was no actual admission into evidence at trial of appellant ’ s response to the officer ’ s purported interrogation of him while in custody , Kulhanek is instructive , nonetheless. Other evidence besides that which appellant sought to suppress illustrated his guilt for the charged offense. Drugs were believed to be in appellant ’ s possession. The drug was believed to b e methamphetamine. Appellant was found in the house being searched for methamphetamine and seen possessing what appeared to be drugs. So too was he seen eating those drugs. The overwhelming weight of that evidence prevents me from concluding that the tr ial court ’ s refusal to grant his motion to suppress affected a substantial right or his decision to plead guilty. Even if the response in question was suppressed , enough evidence existed to more than assure his conviction. And given the totality of the r ecord , it would be mere speculation on my part to believe appellant ignored that quantum of evidence in deciding to plead guilty3

and rather relied simply on the trial court ’ s refusal to suppress redundant evidence. Consequently , I would overrule both issu es and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Brian Quinn Chief Justice Publish.
J. Pickering

Parraguirre

Saitta and we order these consolidated appeals dismissed. This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant's right to file a motion to reinstate these consolidated appeals should the district court decline to grant the relief requested.' Any such motion to reinstate these consolidated appeals shall be filed within 60 days of the district court's order declining to grant the requested relief. The parties' request to stay the briefing schedule in these matters is denied as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

cc: Hon. Jessie Elizabeth Walsh, District Judge Howard Kim & Associates Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

1 We note that any aggrieved party may file a notice of appeal from any appealable order entered at the completion of the district court proceedings. 

### See NRAP 3A.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A ea
#### § 1033.18 Cooperative association.

See § 1000.18.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Maternal and Child Health Library      

# Maternal and Child Health Library

The MCH Library is a virtual guide to MCH information. It offers a combination of MCH information compiled by library staff and pathways to the best MCH information available on other Web sites, from organizations, and in libraries.

http://www.mchlibrary.info/