Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 36 / Thursday, February 25, 2021 / Notices 11553 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 7,221,967 (‘‘the ’967 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 7,409,186 (‘‘the ’186 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,486,929 (‘‘the 

’929 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,729,669 

(‘‘the ’669 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

7,783,318 (‘‘the ’318 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 8,583,033 (‘‘the ’033 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 8,583,034 (‘‘the ’034 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,639,180 (‘‘the 

’180 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,755,399 

(‘‘the ’399 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

8,849,187 (‘‘the ’187 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 8,874,029 (‘‘the ’029 patent’’); 

and U.S. Patent No. 8,874,030 (‘‘the ’030 

patent’’). The complaint, as 

supplemented, further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine Hiner, Office of Docket 

Services, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

February 19, 2021, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to section 210.10(a)(6) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(a)(6), three 

separate investigations be instituted 

based on the complaint to further 

efficient adjudication, one of which is 

instituted by this notice of investigation, 

and that this decision shall not preclude 

the presiding Administrative Law Judge 

from further severing the investigation 

pursuant to section 210.14(h) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14(h), if 

appropriate; 

(2) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 1, 

5–7, 10, and 14 of the ’929 patent; claim 

1 of the ’186 patent; claims 1–7 and 10– 

12 of the ’399 patent; and claims 1–3 of 

the ’187 patent; and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(3) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘cellular signal 

boosters, cellular repeaters, bidirectional cellular signal amplifiers, 

and components such as low-noise 

amplifiers, power amplifiers, filters, 

duplexers, triplexers, multiplexers, 

attenuators, power detectors, 

microcontrollers, and processors’’; 

(4) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Wilson 

Electronics LLC, 3301 E Desert Drive, St. 

George, UT 84790. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Cellphone-Mate, Inc. d/b/a SureCall, 

48346 Milmont Drive, Fremont, CA 

94538; Shenzhen SureCall 

Communication Technology Co., Ltd., 

Yangtian Rd. 72 Area Baoan District, 

Shenzhen, China, 518040. 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations will not participate as a 

party in this investigation. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 22, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–03895 Filed 2–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1249] 

Certain Cellular Signal Boosters, 

Repeaters, Bi-Directional Amplifiers, 

and Components Thereof (I); 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

January 21, 2021, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Wilson Electronics LLC of St. 

George, Utah. Supplements were filed 

on February 1, 8, and 11, 2021. The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain cellular signal boosters, 

repeaters, bi-directional amplifiers, and 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

11554 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 36 / Thursday, February 25, 2021 / Notices 

Patent No. 7,221,967 (‘‘the ’967 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 7,409,186 (‘‘the ’186 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,486,929 (‘‘the 

’929 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,729,669 

(‘‘the ’669 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

7,783,318 (‘‘the ’318 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 8,583,033 (‘‘the ’033 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 8,583,034 (‘‘the ’034 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,639,180 (‘‘the 

’180 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,755,399 

(‘‘the ’399 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

8,849,187 (‘‘the ’187 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 8,874,029 (‘‘the ’029 patent’’); 

and U.S. Patent No. 8,874,030 (‘‘the ’030 

patent’’). The complaint, as 

supplemented, further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine Hiner, Office of Docket 

Services, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: 

The authority for institution of this 

investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

February 19, 2021, Ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to section 210.10(a)(6) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(a)(6), three 

separate investigations be instituted 

based on the complaint to further 

efficient adjudication, one of which is 

instituted by this notice of investigation, 

and that this decision shall not preclude 

the presiding Administrative Law Judge 

from further severing the investigation 

pursuant to section 210.14(h) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14(h), if 

appropriate; 

(2) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 1, 

4–7, and 9 of the ’967 patent; claims 1, 

4, and 9–10 of the ’669 patent; claims 

1–3 of the ’318 patent; and claims 19– 

21 of the ’033 patent; and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(3) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘cellular signal 

boosters, cellular repeaters, bidirectional cellular signal amplifiers, 

and components such as low-noise 

amplifiers, power amplifiers, filters, 

duplexers, triplexers, multiplexers, 

attenuators, power detectors, 

microcontrollers, and processors’’; 

(4) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Wilson 

Electronics LLC, 3301 E Desert Drive, St. 

George, UT 84790. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Cellphone-Mate, Inc. d/b/a SureCall, 

48346 Milmont Drive, Fremont, CA 

94538. 

Shenzhen SureCall Communication 

Technology Co., Ltd., Yangtian Rd. 72 

Area Baoan District, Shenzhen, China, 

518040. 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations will not participate as a 

party in this investigation. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 22, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–03894 Filed 2–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled Certain Organic Light-Emitting 

Diode Displays, Components Thereof, 

and Products Containing Same, DN 

3533; the Commission is soliciting 

comments on any public interest issues 

raised by the complaint or 

complainant’s filing pursuant to the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The 

public version of the complaint can be 

accessed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information