## ENCLOSURE 2

State Implementation Plan Completeness Checklist(page intentionally blank)

### STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST Submittal of Arizona State Implementation Plan Revisionforthe MAG 2014Eight-HourOzone Plan

— 

### SubmittalofMarginalArea Requirementsforthe Maricopa NonattainmentArea 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V, Criteriafor Determining the Completeness ofPlan Submissions, contains the “minimum criteria for determining whether a State Implementation Plan submitted for consideration by EPA is an official submission for purposes of review under §51.103,” Submission of plans, preliminary review ofplans. Appendix V requires the following to be included in plan submissions for review by EPA: 1. “A

### formal letter ofsubmittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA acceptance of the plan or revision thereof(hereafter “the 

### plan”).” [AppendixV, 2.1(a)] See coverletter. 2. “Evidencethatthe State has adopted the plan in the State code orbodyofregulations; orissued the permit, order, consentagreement (hereafter “document”) in final form. Thatevidence shall include the date ofadoption orfinal issuance as well asthe effective date ofthe plan, ifdifferent from the adoption/issuance date.” [Appendix V, 2.1(b)] See coverletter. 3. “Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implementthe plan.” [AppendixV, 2.1(c)] See Enclosure 1. 4. “A copy of the actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made (such as, redline/strikethrough) tothe existing approved plan, where applicable ...“ [AppendixV, 2.1(d)] See Enclosure 3. 5. “Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State’s laws and constitution 

### in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan.” [Appendix V, 2.1(e)] See coverletterand Enclosure 3, Appendix B, Exhibit 1: Public Hearing Process Documentation. 6. “Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, 

### including the date ofpublication ofsuch notice.” [Appendix V, 2.1(f)] See Enclosure 3, Appendix B, Exhibit 1.7. “Certification that public hearing(s) were held in accordance with the information provided in

the public notice and the State’s laws and constitution, if applicable and consistent with the public hearing requirements in 40 CFR 51.102.” [Appendix V, 2.1(g)] See Enclosure 3, Appendix B, Exhibit 1. 8. “Compilation ofpublic comments andthe State’s responsethereto.” [Appendix V, 2.1(h)] See Enclosure 3, Appendix B, Exhibit 1. 9. “Identification ofall regulated pollutants affected bythe plan.” [AppendixV, 2.2(a)] Ozone, ozone precursors. 10. “Identification ofthe locations ofaffected sources including the EPA attainmentlnonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected areas(s).” [AppendixV, 2.2 (b)] See Enclosure 3. 11. “Quantification ofthe changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification ofchanges in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a resultofthe revision.” [Appendix V, 2.2(c)] See Enclosure 3. 12. “The State’s demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. For all requests to redesignate an area to attainment for a national primary ambient air quality standard, under section 107 of the Act, a revision must be submitted to provide for the maintenance of the national primaryambient airqualitystandardsforat least 10years as required bysection 175A oftheAct.” [AppendixV, 2.2(d)] See Enclosure 3. 13. “Modeling information required to supportthe proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, justification of model selections, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the detennination of adequacy of the modeling analysis.” [AppendixV, 2.2(e)] See Enclosure 3. 14. “Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology.” [Appendix V, 2.2(f)] See Enclosure 3.15. “Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and

recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels.” [Appendix V, 2.2(g)] See Enclosure 3. 16. “Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in practice.” [Appendix V, 2.2(h)] See Enclosure 3. 17. “Special economic and technologicaljustifications required by any applicable EPA policies, or an explanation ofwhy suchjustifications are not necessary.” [Appendix V, 2.2(i)] No known deviation from EPA policy.