alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1230.80 Reports. Each person responsible for collecting or remitting any assessment under § 1230.71(b) shall report at the time for remitting assessments to the Board the following information: ( a ) The quantity and market value of the porcine animals subject to assessment;
( b ) The amount of assessment collected;
( c ) The month the assessment was collected;
( d ) The State where the porcine animals were produced; and
( e ) Such other information as may be required by regulations prescribed by the Board and approved by the Secretary.
Fourth Department,

March, 1967

(March 30, 1967)

#### In the Matter of Isabelle L. Leonard, Petitioner, v. William S. Hults, as Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, Respondent.

Determination annulled, without costs. Memorandum: We find no substantial evidence in the record to support the determination. All concur, except Marsh, J., who dissents and votes to confirm the determination. (Review of determination suspending driver’s license, transferred by order of Monroe Special Term.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Del Vecehio and Marsh, JJ.
January 24, 1980.

M. P. No. 79-485.

#### Harry Douglas Pettis *v.*William E. Reis *et al.*

Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.

*Pettis, Healy ir Jones, Bernard Healy,*for petitioner, *Rice, Dolan, Kiernan ir Kershaw, Thomas C. Plunkett, Leonard A. Kiernan, Jr.,*for Continental Casualty Company.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
<page>

                EXHIBIT 32.1 CEO CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smart SMS Corp. (the "COMPANY") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, STEAPHAN WEIR, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/ STEAPHAN WEIR
-----------------------
STEAPHAN WEIR
Chief Executive Officer

November 28, 2007
#### 970.2702-4 Royalties.

Contracting officers must use the solicitation provision at 970.5227-7, Royalty Information, and the clause at 970.5227-8, Refund of Royalties instead of the provision at 48 CFR 52.227-8 and the clause at 48 CFR 52.227-9, respectively.
(May 23, 1980)

#### Vivian Tymko, Respondent, v K-Mart Discount Stores, Inc., a Division of S.S. Kresge Co., Inc., Defendant, and Plough, Inc., Appellant.

Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff sues to recover the injuries which she allegedly sustained when she used Q-T Quick Tanning Solution, a product manufactured by defendant Plough, Inc., and which she purchased at a store of defendant, K-Mart Discount Stores, Inc. She alleges causes of action in negligence, strict products liability and breach of warranty. As a part of her pretrial preparation, she has had extensive discovery and has had a chemist analyze the product purchased. She now seeks disclosure of the formula for Q-T Tanning Lotion. Defendant Plough, Inc., appeals an order of Special Term which denied its application for a protective order, claiming that the formula is a trade secret and unnecessary to plaintiffs proof. The motion was properly denied. The formula is material and necessary to the negligence cause of action to determine whether the product was negligently made, e.g., whether the ingredients were mixed in the proper proportions, and it is material and necessary to aid in establishing negligent design in the strict products liability action. While plaintiff is entitled to the information, material confidential in nature or information which is subject to abuse if widely disseminated should be accorded judicial safeguards where possible. Thus, we modify Special Term’s order to provide that "any party to the action, his attorney or representatives be barred from disclosing trade or business secrets, secret processes or research or any other confidential material disclosed upon the examination to anyone other than counsel working on this case, officers of the court and any court supervising disclosure and any expert reasonably necessary for the preparation and trial of this case” *(Snyder v Parke, Davis & Co.,*56 AD2d 536, 537; *McLaughlin v G.D. Searle, Inc.,*38 AD2d 810, 811; see *Cohen v Resnik,*50 AD2d 847). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court—protective order.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134278 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, DONNA COMPEAU, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134278 

 COA: 274495 

Alpena CC: 04-003455-NH 

ROBERT M. CURRIER, D.O., and ROBERT M. 

CURRIER, D.O., P.C., a/k/a NORTHERN EYE, 

Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

ALPENA GENERAL HOSPITAL,

Defendant.
 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.2
                              STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Arthur Healey, Chief Financial Officer of InforMedix Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)   the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2004, to which this certification accompanies (the "Annual
      Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Dated: March 31, 2005
                                                /s/ Arthur Healey
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Arthur Healey,
                                                Chief Financial Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to InforMedix Holdings,
Inc. and will be retained by InforMedix Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1339 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1339

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2023

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To require the Federal Communications Commission to review certain 
rules of the Commission and develop recommendations for rule changes to 
         promote precision agriculture, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Precision Agriculture Satellite 
Connectivity Act''.

SEC. 2. PRECISION AGRICULTURE SATELLITE CONNECTIVITY.

    (a) Review.--The Commission, in consultation with the Task Force, 
shall--
            (1) review the rules of the Commission relating to fixed 
        satellite service, mobile satellite service, and earth 
        exploration satellite service to determine if there are rule 
        changes that the Commission could implement under existing 
        authority to promote precision agriculture; and
            (2) if the Commission determines under paragraph (1) that 
        there are rule changes that the Commission could implement, 
        develop recommendations for how to implement the changes.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 15 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee 
on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report on the 
results of the review conducted under subsection (a), including any 
recommendations developed under paragraph (2) of such subsection.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
        Communications Commission.
            (2) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the Task 
        Force for Reviewing the Connectivity and Technology Needs of 
        Precision Agriculture in the United States established under 
        section 12511 of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 
        (Public Law 115-334).

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0538

_____________________________

MICHAEL GLIDDEN,

Petitioner,

v.

MARK S. INCH, Secretary,

Florida Department of

Corrections,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

February 25, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Michael Glidden, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant 

General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.
May 7, 2014 Secretary Anthony Foxx U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Docket DOT-OST-2008-0299 Dear Secretary Foxx, Iwrite to express my concerns with the Department ofTransportation's Tentative Orderto terminate the Essential Air Service (EAS) program in El Centro, California located in Imperial County. I urge you to consider the negative economic impactthat may occur as a result ofthe proposed termination ofthe program. The Imperial County Airport has atremendous track record of surpassing the EAS program requirements putforth by the government, as they have dramatically exceeded the enplanement minimum in four ofthe lastfive fiscal years. Unfortunately, in FY 2013, the Imperial County Airport barely fell belowthe ten enplanement threshold, by reaching 9.5 enplanements for the first time. As you know, the Essential Air Service was put into place to guaranteethat small communities, including those within the Imperial County, continue to be served by certificated air carriers. Overthe last several years, Imperial County has experienced the highest unemployment rate in the nation. Ourfederal government should encourage economic growth, and consider all factors before terminating a much-needed program in the region. As you prepare the Final Order, I urge you to considerthe Imperial Valley's track record over the lastthree fiscal years, and ask that you consider the void that will be left should the Department ofTransportation ultimately decide to terminate the much-needed Essential Air Service program currently in effect at the Imperial County Airport. Thank you for your time and consideration of my request.

Fidel Gonzalez President/CEO

BRAWLEY OFFICE: I409 W. Main St. IBrawley, CA 92227

1 (760) 351-2988 EL CENTRO OFFICE: 11602 W. Main St. IP.O. Box 3247 IEl Centro, CA 92243 I92244 1(760) 352-1540 

### www.ficu.com CALEXICO OFFICE: 12534 Rockwood Ave. Unit 1-A ICalexico, CA 92231 1(760) 357-5117
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

((vou make changes to the values in the fable below. you mustl!nsure the totals update accordingly. (I" 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out <?{the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Prod uct (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

Do (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

A ccess (both struts) 2.0 I l f I 54 I H 

Close (both struts) 2.0 ~. l 7

0 on ·, I !J l.ld 54 n ~~t) UP 

Part 1 : Hydraulic 

fluid contamination 3.1 ) ~l''i5'J 

GVI ' Inspection, ~6 ~ ' 54 ,] lli•l 

Fig 1 - Strut 1 

Part 1: Hydraulic 

fluid contamination 3.1 '\ ::;t,3 .;;\) '. .:p. ~ :o 54 1 n qq 

GVI Inspection, 

Fig 2 - Strut 2 

' () IJ() ( t.Hl I l\t 

' n.oP , I ~ ! t :1 ·l! 

' O.fllr II Ill! ,;-;a 

' n (lq II /lll ( l ;)I) 

'-, ,l,i)l) (1,171 !, (·!\ 

\ n t \ (iII(\ ' '' tH} 

' t) 0!1 · •• ---r;-,/111 ;>,\ •i} 

n.o:l iJ I hJ ., 1 ,r 1 

' O.OP [) \,II I p f)rl 

.:.. ll.t)d il (Ill '.l'l 

~ l.lthl 11 <)!I ljl 

\ ().(}(! ) t I 1\P T'i){ 

' () (l( " .,.on !1 II} 

.. 

"' n.no ~ 0 !I! I . ) 

'\ ()_00 , 11 t•n \ 1 I ~~ 

" 0 \II) i )< (111'1 

The known number oforoducts in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $46,818 

Costs covered under wan·anty (if known) $ 
On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

Part 2: Interior 

DET Inspection 

( 6.2 hrs/airplane) 

Fig 3 - Strut 1 

Fig 4 - Strut 2 

Part 3: Exterior 7.2 

D ET Inspection 

(l.O hrs/airplane) 

Fig 5 - Strut 1 

Fig 6- Strut 2 

Part 4: Assembly 

Replacement 

Fig 7 to 12, Strut 1 35.0 ' - $420,440 \ 1 

Fig 13 to 18, Strut 2 

Part 5: MORE 

WORK-DET 

INSPECTION 7.6 ) 11 +II t fl l 

Fig 19 - Strut 1 

Fig 20 - Strut 2 

Part6: MORE 

WORKELECTRICAL 

INSPECTION & 

INSTALL 

FASTENERS 

Fig 21 - Strut 1 

14.0 • ' I ( 11 I I $458 '.I (! \ ' 

Fig 22 - Strut 2 

Note, cost for one 

supplemental kit is 

$229. 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action ~ 

YES* D NO [8] 

*Explanation: 
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* D NO IZl 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

e ither a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YES D NOIZ] 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* D NO IZl 

*Explanation:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Updated Model Indian Juvenile Code      

# Resource: Updated Model Indian Juvenile Code

This resource (PDF, 3 pages) serves as a framework to help tribes interested in creating or enhancing their own codes that focus on juvenile justice. This model code encourages the use of alternatives to detention and confinement while focusing on community-based, multi-disciplinary responses to juvenile delinquency, truancy, and child-in-need services. 

http://www.bia.gov/cs/groups/public/documents/text/idc2-050414.pdf?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links
**Exhibit 12.01**

 

# **NSP-MINNESOTA AND SUBSIDIARIES****STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OFRATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES***(amounts in thousands of dollars)*

#  

| ** **                               | ** ** | **Year ended Dec. 31,** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                               | ** ** | **2008**                               | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** |
| Earnings as defined:                     |       |                                   |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Pretax income from continuing operations |       | $                                      | 463,377    |   | $ | 449,327 |   | $ | 399,916 |   | $ | 349,527 |   | $ | 324,887 |   |
| Add: Fixed charges                       |       | 240,539                                |       | 211,660 |   | 176,169 |   | 158,352 |   | 150,610 |   |
| Earnings as defined                      |       | $                                      | 703,916    |   | $ | 660,987 |   | $ | 576,085 |   | $ | 507,879 |   | $ | 475,497 |   |
| Fixed charges:                           |       |                                   |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest charges                         |       | $                                      | 198,369    |   | $ | 186,293 |   | $ | 165,381 |   | $ | 150,261 |   | $ | 142,147 |   |
| Interest component of leases             |       | 42,170                                 |       | 25,367 |   | 10,788 |   | 8,091 |   | 8,463 |   |
| Total fixed charges                      |       | $                                      | 240,539    |   | $ | 211,660 |   | $ | 176,169 |   | $ | 158,352 |   | $ | 150,610 |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges       |       | 2.9                                    |       | 3.1 |   | 3.3 |   | 3.2 |   | 3.2 |   |

 

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Multilingual Learner Toolkits: Find What Works for You      

# Resource: Multilingual Learner Toolkits: Find What Works for You

This set of toolkits helps parents, educators, and administrators support students who are English Language Learners. **Learn more.**