13400 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Notices 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2 86 FR 5136 (January 19, 2021). 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

March 2, 2021, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 6 

and 8 of the ’679 patent; claims 18–20 

of the ’326 patent; claims 12 and 16–18 

of the ’120 patent; and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘LTE-compliant 

cellular phones, tablets, and 

smartwatches’’; 

(3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(l), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding administrative law judge shall 

take evidence or other information and 

hear arguments from the parties or other 

interested persons with respect to the 

public interest in this investigation, as 

appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors set forth 

in 19 U.S.C. l337(d)(l), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(4) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Evolved 

Wireless, LLC, 900 S Capital of Texas 

Highway, Suite 150, Austin, TX 78746. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 129, 

Samseong-Ro, Yoeongtong-Gu, 

Suwon-Si, Gyeonngi-Do 16677, 

Republic of Korea 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 85 

Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ 

07660–2118 

Motorola Mobility LLC, 222 W 

Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800, 

Chicago, Illinois 60654 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(5) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: March 2, 2021. 

By order of the Commission. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04651 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1472 (Final)] 

Difluoromethane (R–32) From China 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigation, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), 

that an industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of imports 

of difluoromethane (R–32) from China, 

provided for in subheadings 2903.39.20 

and 3824.78.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States, that have 

been found by the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in 

the United States at less than fair value 

(‘‘LTFV’’).2

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

investigation effective January 23, 2020, 

following receipt of a petition filed with 

the Commission and Commerce by 

Arkema, Inc., King of Prussia, 

Pennsylvania. The Commission 

scheduled the final phase of the 

investigation following notification of a 

preliminary determination by 

Commerce that imports of R–32 from 

China were being sold at LTFV within 

the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act 

(19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). Notice of the 

scheduling of the final phase of the 

Commission’s investigation and of a 

public hearing to be held in connection 

therewith was given by posting copies 

of the notice in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, Washington, DC, and by 

publishing the notice in the Federal 

Register of September 9, 2020 (85 FR 

55688). Subsequently, the Commission 

cancelled its previously scheduled 

hearing following the withdrawal of 

petitioners’ request to appear at the 

hearing (86 FR 6670, January 22, 2021). 

The Commission made this 

determination pursuant to § 735(b) of 

the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)). It 

completed and filed its determination in 

this investigation on March 2, 2021. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 5165 (March 

2021), entitled Difluoromethane (R–32) 

from China: Investigation No. 731–TA– 

1472 (Final). 

By order of the Commission. 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Notices 13401 

Issued: March 2, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04696 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request; Generic 

Clearance for Formative Data 

Collections for Research and 

Evaluation, New Collection 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Policy, Chief Evaluation 

Office, Department of Labor. 

ACTION: Notice of information collection; 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor 

(DOL), as part of its continuing effort to 

reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, conducts a preclearance 

consultation program to provide the 

general public and federal agencies with 

an opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing collections of 

information in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA95). This program helps to ensure 

that requested data can be provided in 

the desired format, reporting burden 

(time and financial resources) is 

minimized, collection instruments are 

clearly understood, and the impact of 

collection requirements on respondents 

is properly assessed. Currently, the 

Department of Labor is soliciting 

comments concerning the collection of 

data for formative data collections for 

research and evaluations. A copy of the 

proposed Information Collection 

Request (ICR) can be obtained by 

contacting the office listed below in the 

addressee section of this notice. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted to the office listed in the 

addressee section below on or before 

May 7, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by either one of the following methods: 

Email: ChiefEvaluationOffice@

dol.gov; Mail or Courier: Chayun Yi, 

Chief Evaluation Office, OASP, U.S. 

Department of Labor, Room S–2312, 200 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20210. Instructions: Please submit 

one copy of your comments by only one 

method. All submissions received must 

include the agency name and OMB 

Control Number identified above for 

this information collection. Comments, 

including any personal information 

provided, become a matter of public 

record. They will also be summarized 

and/or included in the request for OMB 

approval of the information collection 

request. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chayun Yi by email at 

ChiefEvaluationOffice@dol.gov or by 

phone at (202) 693–5084. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background: The Chief Evaluation 

Office (CEO) of the U.S. Department of 

Labor (DOL) intends to design and 

conduct evaluations of DOL-funded 

programs. Under this generic clearance, 

DOL would engage in a variety of 

formative data collections with 

researchers, practitioners, TA providers, 

service providers and potential 

participants throughout the field to 

fulfill the following goals: (1) Inform the 

development of CEO research, (2) 

maintain a research agenda that is 

rigorous and relevant, (3) ensure that 

research products are as current as 

possible and (4) inform the provision of 

technical assistance. CEO envisions 

using a variety of techniques including 

semi-structured discussions, focus 

groups, surveys, and telephone or inperson interviews, in order to reach 

these goals. Following standard OMB 

requirements, DOL will submit a change 

request for each individual data 

collection activity under this generic 

clearance. Each request will include the 

individual instrument(s), a justification 

specific to the individual information 

collection, and any supplementary 

documents. OMB should review 

requests within 10 days of submission. 

Type of Review: New information 

collection request. 

OMB Control Number: 1290–0NEW. 

Affected Public: The populations to be 

studied include key stakeholder groups 

involved in DOL projects and programs, 

state or local government officials, 

service providers, participants in DOL 

programs or similar comparison groups, 

experts in fields pertaining to DOL 

research and programs, or others 

involved in conducting DOL research or 

evaluation projects. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this request will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for Office of 

Management and Budget approval of the 

information collection request; they will 

also become a matter of public record. 

ESTIMATED ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS

Type of instrument 

(form/activity) 

Number of 

respondents 

Number of 

responses per 

respondent 

Total number 

of responses 

Average 

burden time 

per response 

(hours) 

Estimated 

burden hours 

Semi-structured discussions and focus groups ................... 3,000 1 3,000 1 3,000 

Interviews ............................................................................. 1,500 1 1,500 1 1,500 

Questionnaires/surveys ........................................................ 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000 

Total .............................................................................. 5,500 ........................ 5,500 ........................ 5,500 

Christina Yancey, 

Chief Evaluation Officer, U.S. Department of 

Labor. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04685 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–HX–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Request for Information: Science, 

Technology, Engineering, Art, and 

Mathematics at the Poles 

AGENCY: National Science Foundation. 

ACTION: Request for information. 

SUMMARY: The National Science 

Foundation’s (NSF) Office of Polar 

Programs (OPP) and the Education and 

Human Resources (EHR) Directorate 

request input from interested parties on 

the goals, values, and approaches for 

managing the Antarctic Artist and 

Writers (AAW) Program and possibly 

expanding that program to include the 

Arctic. In addition, OPP and EHR 

request input into whether the NSF 

program which selects and sends 

educators to the Poles should be under 

a common management structure. This 

RFI will help inform NSF as it considers 

potential avenues for managing and 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES