alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J

~ v ~ ED srq T

~ s
7 Z UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY a 

# ~ e WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

0

~ FyT ' 9 C PROO G

~ 

## t1UL 2 8 2014 Mr. J. R. Stroble Director, National TRU Program OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION 

### Carlsbad Field Office Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221 Dear Mr. Stroble: We received your letter dated July 22, 2014, requesting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft recertification expansion memo the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) plans to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). We concur with the draft memo to recertify ORNL's contact-handled TRU waste characterization program to be expanded to include the Solids (S3000) summary category group as approved by EPA on July 9, 2014. The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of CH and RH TRU wastes are appropriately included in Attaclunent 4 of the draft recertification expansion memo. The waste characterization equipment, procedures and processes mentioned in the ORNL draft recertification memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site.`I'hank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification expansion memo for ORNLCCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 202-343-9462. Sincerely,

~ i 

# . ~ 

# ...._.. ---_._...,.._..

~ w. 

### Edward Feltcorn Center for Waste Management and Regulations

cc: (Electronic Distribution) Tom Morgan CBFO NTP Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA Site Documents, CBFO Tom Peake, EPA Raymond Lee, EPA

Internet Address (URL) • http://-www.epa.gov

Recycled/Recyclable * Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
§ 1207.335 Research and promotion. The Board shall develop and submit to the Secretary for approval any programs or projects authorized in this section. Such programs or projects shall provide for: ( a ) The establishment, issuance, effectuation and administration of appropriate programs or projects for the advertising and promotion of potatoes and potato products: *Provided, however,* That any such program or project shall be directed toward increasing the general demand for potatoes and potato products;
( b ) Establishing and carrying on research and development projects and studies to the end that the marketing and utilization of potatoes may be encouraged, expanded, improved, or made more efficient: *Provided,* That quality control, grade standards and supply management programs shall not be conducted under, or as a part of, this plan; and
( c ) The development and expansion of potato and potato product sales in foreign markets.
( d ) No advertising or promotion program shall make any reference to private brand names or use false or unwarranted claims in behalf of potatoes or their products or false or unwarranted statements with respect to the attributes or use of any competing products.
#### In the Matter of P. G. P. Entertainment Corp., Respondent, v State Liquor Authority, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered August 2, 1979, which annulled the SLA’s determination, dated April 25, 1979, denying petitioner’s application for an on-premises liquor license and which directed the issuance of that license forthwith, reversed, on the law, petition dismissed and the SLA’s determination reinstated, without costs. It is for the State Liquor Authority (SLA) to determine whether the public interest will be served by the issuance or denial of a particular liquor license. Unless it is clear that there was no substantial reason for the exercise of its discretion, the courts will not interfere with the SLA’s determination on a particular application. *(Matter of Restaurants & Patisseries Longchamps v O’Connell,*271 App Div 684, 687, affd 296 NY 888.) In arriving at a determination, the SLA may consider all relevant information available to it upon the application (cf. *Rios v State Liq. Auth.,*32 AD2d 995). The premises proposed by the petitioner were designed to accommodate over 200 patrons and to provide live entertainment. While these premises did not fall within the "two hundred feet” prohibition of subdivision 7 of section 64 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, the SLA properly took cognizance of the fact that they were otherwise in close proximity to churches, a. temple and a school. In view of the fact that the premises were targeted for a highly sensitive area, the SLA was justified in scrutinizing petitioner’s application very carefully. The record before the SLA indicated that neither of the stockholders in the petitioner had any experience in the liquor or the entertainment business. Because the stockholders lacked the necessary experience to operate premises of this size and character in this delicate community setting, there was a rational basis for the SLA’s denial of petitioner’s application for an on-premises liquor license. *(Matter of Camuglia v Rohan,*11 AD2d 718, affd 9 NY2d 745; *Matter of Soul Scene v State Liq. Auth.,*35 AD2d 574; *Matter of 1522-1526 Second Ave. Rest, v State Liq. Auth.,*31 AD2d 534.) Hence, it was error for the court at Special Term to substitute its judgment for that of the SLA. *(Matter of Glintenkamp v O’Connell,*271 App Div 795, affd 296 NY 806.) Concur— Murphy, P. J., Birns, Fein, Lupiano and Ross, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Woodrow Wheeler, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 48]

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (John A.K. Bradley, J.), rendered April 10, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 12 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly sentenced defendant as a persistent violent felony offender. Defendant did not establish a factual basis for his constitutional challenge to a 1989 felony conviction. Defendant’s assertion that he “believed” that he “would have” instructed his attorney to file a notice of appeal from that conviction is factually insufficient to support his claim that his attorney rendered ineffective assistance by disregarding a direct instruction to file such a notice *(see Roe v Flores-Ortega,*528 US 470 [2000]).

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Lerner, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
#### Carol Mellerski, Respondent, v Great Lakes Auto Racing Promotions, Inc., Appellant. Carol Mellerski, Respondent, v Donald Botting, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum decision at Special Term, Kuszynski, J. Memorandum: In affirming we note that this court’s decision in *Rotary v Spencer Speedway*(47 AD2d 127) relied upon by appellants is distinguishable upon its facts. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—summary judgment.) Present— Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Doerr and Moule, JJ.
#### Phyllis Elman, Respondent, v Ira H. Elman, Appellant.

In a matrimonial action, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 5, 1979, as (1) granted plaintiff increased visitation rights and awarded her a counsel fee, and (2) denied defendant’s cross motion for a change of venue. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, by (1) striking the provision granting unsupervised visitation to the plaintiif and substituting therefor a provision referring the matter to Special Term, Orange County, for a hearing on the issue of unsupervised visitation; (2) striking the provision granting plaintiff counsel fees; and (3) striking the provision which denied the motion for a change of venue and substituting therefor a provision granting the motion and directing that the venue of the action be changed to Orange County. On this record, it is apparent that the plaintiffs right to unsupervised visitation should have been the subject of a *883hearing and that the hearing we now direct should be held in Orange County where the defendant and the child reside. As to counsel fees, the absence of a motion for such relief and a record to support such a grant, mandates reversal. Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: 4th of July Drunk Driving Prevention Campaign      

# Resource: 4th of July Drunk Driving Prevention Campaign

This campaign provides resources to support the drunk driving prevention efforts for the upcoming 4th of July holiday, which is one of the deadliest holidays of the year due to drunk-driving crashes. 

http://www.trafficsafetymarketing.gov/july4th?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
Exhibit 4.37


 


 


PROMISSORY NOTE COMBINATION #7 EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


 


 


This Promissory
Note Combination #7 Extension Agreement, hereinafter referred to as “Combination #7 Extension”, entered into this Sixteenth
day of December, 2012, by and among Intellinetics, Inc, hereinafter called “Maker” and Alpharion Capital Partners,
hereinafter called “Lender”.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender have entered into a Promissory Note Combination #7 dated November 16, 2012 for the amount of ONE HUNDRED THIRTY
ONE THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($131,500), hereinafter referred to as “Note Combination #7”. Said Note Combination
#7 was originally due on a due date of December 16, 2012.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender desire to enter into this Combination #7 Extension Agreement in order to extend the due date of the Note Combination
# for an additional thirty days to January 15, 2013.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
it is dually agreed by both Maker and Lender to extend the due date of the Note Combination #7 to January 15, 2013.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Maker and Lender
has duly executed this


Combination #6 Extension as of the day and year above
first written.


 


	 	INTELLINETICS, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ William J. Santiago
	 	 
	 	ALPHARION CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Rick Hughes
#### § 1250.361 Right of the Secretary.

All fiscal matters, programs or projects, rules or regulations, reports, or other substantive action proposed and prepared by the Board shall be submitted to the Secretary for his approval.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K


CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





October 8, 2009


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)







NICOR INC.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Illinois
1-7297
36-2855175(State or other jurisdiction
(Commission
(I.R.S. Employerof incorporation)
File Number)
Identification Number)




1844 Ferry Road


Naperville, Illinois 60563-9600


(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)





(630) 305-9500


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):




[  ]           Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)




[  ]           Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)




[  ]           Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))




[  ]           Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))












Page 1





Item 8.01              Other Events.




On October 8, 2009, Nicor Inc. issued a press release announcing that the Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC) issued its decision on rehearing in the rate case of the company's gas distribution company, Nicor Gas. The decision will result in an annual base rate revenue increase of approximately $11 million and reflects a rate
of return on rate base of 8.09 percent beginning in October 2009. The increase will add about $0.29 to an average monthly residential customer bill.




A copy of the press release is filed as Exhibit 99.01 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.





Item 9.01  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(d)
Exhibits





99.01              Press release of Nicor Inc. issued October 8, 2009







Page 2


Signature





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.








Nicor
Inc.








DateOctober 8, 2009/s/
PAUL C. GRACEY, JR.


Paul
C. Gracey, Jr.


Senior
Vice President, General Counsel and


Secretary










Page 3





Exhibit Index





Exhibit


Number             Description of Documents





99.01               Press release of Nicor Inc. issued October 8, 2009
**Exhibit 23.4**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

 

We hereby consent to the use of the name RPS Troy-Ikoda Limited and of references to RPS Troy-Ikoda Limited and to the inclusion of andreferences to our report, or information contained therein, dated 28th February 2005, prepared for ATP Oil & Gas(UK) Limited in the ATP Oil & Gas Corporation annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended 31st December 2004,and the incorporation by reference to the report prepared by Troy-Ikoda Limited into ATP Oil & Gas Corporation’s previously filed Registration Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-105699 and 333-121662) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-60762). 

 

RPS Troy-Ikoda Limited 

 

29 March 2005
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. John Schmidt, alias Jack Smith, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 7,939.

Opinion filed November 15, 1929.

Rehearing denied February 4, 1930.

George T. Liddell, for plaintiff in error. William D. Knight, State’s Attorney, and Alfred B. Louison, Assistant State’s Attorney, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

GANNETT CO., INC. 
 2015
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 RULES FOR POST-2004 DEFERRALS 

Amendment No. 2 

Effective as of the date TEGNA Inc. spins off Cars.com Inc. as a separate, publicly traded company, Gannett Co., Inc. hereby amends the
Gannett Co., Inc. 2015 Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended, Rules for Post-2004 Deferrals (the “Plan”), as follows: 
 1.
Section 2.6(b) is amended to add the following provision to the end thereof: 
 As a consequence of TEGNA Inc.’s spinning off Cars.com
Inc. (“Cars.com”) as a separate, publicly traded company (the “Cars.com Spin-off”), Participant accounts deemed invested in the TEGNA stock fund will be credited with hypothetical shares of
Cars.com consistent with the terms of the Cars.com Spin-off, and the Plan will establish a separate hypothetical Cars.com stock fund to track such shares. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary,
Participants may elect in a manner prescribed by the Committee to allocate out of such Cars.com stock fund but shall not be able to allocate any additional amounts to the Cars.com stock fund. 

2. Section 2.8 is amended by adding “cash” before each occurrence of “dividends” in the second and third sentences of such
Section and adding the following provision to the end of such Section: 
 Notwithstanding the foregoing, deemed cash dividends relating to
hypothetical Cars.com stock in the hypothetical Cars.com stock fund will not be deemed reinvested in Cars.com stock. Instead, such deemed cash dividends will be hypothetically invested proportionately in the investment funds selected by the
Participant in his most recent investment direction, or, in the absence of an explicit investment direction, in the default investment fund. 

3. Section 2.9(h) is amended to add the following provision to the end thereof: 

Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this Plan, any portion of a Participant’s Deferred Compensation Account deemed
invested in shares of Cars.com may only be settled in cash. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Gannett Co., Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized officer as of May 31, 2017. 
  

			
	GANNETT CO., INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David Harmon

	Name:	 	David Harmon
	Title:	 	Chief People Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Interactive School Ventilation Tool      

# Resource: Interactive School Ventilation Tool

This tool is available for schools to estimate how they can reduce virus particles, including COVID-19 particles, in classrooms year-round. The tool shows how simple methods, including running HEPA air purifiers, increasing the use of outdoor air in HVAC systems when possible, and running exhaust fans, can reduce virus particles. **Learn more.**
#### Benjamin E. Langguth, appellee, v. Edward Breither, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,144.

*627Opinion filed June 26, 1929.

Perry B. Brelin, for appellant; Floyd E. Britton, of counsel. No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Justice Ryner

delivered the opinion of the court.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BULLETIN 1280
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PLATE 1
37°00!
1 otk Is I T
J___Amboden coal 7 or mie N Ce a

FLEXURE

Big Stone Gap

0.1 MILE
|

NG
Isom Rock Spur! SS WO ee A :
~ WS \\

kK lackwood in
7 ~~

55'}-—

. _— 7

Moy

4

°
Deep well or core hole
H.
Line of structure
section cited in text
<= ee en
$ Outcrop of measured section
<
> Measured sections, wells, and core
Wise and Norton Formations _ Gladeville Sandstone cad holes referred to in text
50" ae (Gladeville 2 1. Lee Formation at Big Stone Gap 7
jandstone absent) Z 2. Gladeville Sandstone at Wise
: J 3. Lower part of Norton Formation at
Norton Formation a Little Stone Gap
Pb Rex 4. Norton Formation in Graham No. 1 well
NaN) 5. Norton Formation on Coeburn- Wise road
Lee Formation 6. Middle part of Norton Formation at
Plb, Bee Rock Sandstone Member, Big Stone Gap .
shoun én sectionconly 7. Wise Formation on Appalachia-Lynch road
8. Robbins Chapel Sandstone Member of
Wise Formation at Robbins Chapel
9. Keokee Sandstone Member of Wise
A Pre-Pennsylvanian formations Formation on Keokee-Big Stone Gap road
Fi pls) —_ 10. Wise Formation on Keokee-Morris Gap road
bot ttt Contact 11. Harlan Formation in core hole at
Dashed where approximately located Grassy Gap
36°45! . L. L
55’ 50 45 40" 35° 30° 82°25"

GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC MAP AND SECTION OF THE WESTERN PART OF THE VIRGINIA COAL FIELDS SHOWING Sea RUT

THE LOCATION OF MEASURED AND STRUCTURE SECTIONS, CORE HOLES, AND DEEP WELLS 353-475 0 - 69 (In pocket)
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Sexual Risk Behavior Differences Among Sexual Minority High School Students — United States, 2015 and 2017

This report uses data from the 2015 and 2017 cycles of the national Youth Risk Behavior Survey to examine differences in eight sexual risk behaviors between subgroups of sexual minority youth and nonsexual minority youth, as well as within sexual minority youth. 

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6736a3.htm