FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENT HC IR C UIT APRIL 21 , 2006 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 13034 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 9 5 - 0 6 0 3 1 - C R - DT KH U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f- A p p e lle e , v ersu s T R A C Y T O P A Z T U R N E R , a .k .a . T o n y B r o w , a .k .a . T r a c y T h o m a s , a .k .a . T o n y H . B r o w n , D e fe n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt forthe S outhe r n D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( A p r i l 21, 2006) B efo re C A R N E S , P R Y O R an d F A Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

T r a c y T opa z T ur ne r , afe de r a l pr i s one rpr oc e e di ng pr o s e , a ppe a l s the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s de ni a l of hi s m oti on t o m odi f

y orc orr e c thi s s e nt e nc e unde r18 U . S. C. § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) . Fo rth e r e a s o n s s e tfo r th mo r e f u l l y b e l o w , w e a f

f i r m. T ur ne rw a s c onvi c t e d by aj ur y of one c ountof

c ons pi r a c y t o pos s e s s a nd t w o c ount s of

pos s e s s i on w i th the i nt e ntt o di s tr i but e c oc a i ne ba s e , i n vi ol a ti on of 21 U . S . C . §§ 841( a ) ( 1) a nd 846. H e w a s s e nt e nc e d t o 360 m onths ’ i m pr i s onm e nt on ea ch coun tt o run concurrentl y. T urner’ s c on vi cti on and sent ence w er e a ff i rm ed on appeal i n 1 99 7. T he re cord i nd i ca t es thatT urner f i l ed a m ot i on t o v ac at e, w hi ch w as deni ed. T urner then fi l ed a m ot i on for r el i ef fr om hi s j ud gm entun der F eder al R u le o f C iv il P r o c e d u r e 6 0 ( b ) ( 4 ) a n d ( b ) ( 6 ) , ar g u in g , a m o n g o th e rth in g s , th a t h is c o u n s e l w a s in e f

fe c tiv e fo rfa ilin g to o bje c t to th e u s e o f p r io rc o n v ic tio n s to e nha nc e hi s s e nt e nc e . T ur ne r ’ s m oti on w a s de ni e d, a nd both the di s tr i c tc our ta nd th is C o u r t d e n ie d h is r e q u e s t fo rac e r tif ic a te o f a p p e a lab ility . O n A p r il 1 1 , 2 0 0 5 , T u r n e rf ile d th e in s ta n t m o tio n to m o d if y o rc o rr e c t h is se n ten ce u n d er1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 8 2 (c )( 2 ). H e a rg u ed th at th e S u p re m e C o u rt’s opi ni on i n U ni t e d S t a t e s v. B ooke r , 543 U . S . 220, 125 S . C t . 738, 160 L . E d. 2d 621 ( 2005) a c t e d a s ac l a r i f

y i ng a m e ndm e ntt o the gui de l i ne s a nd tha tB ooke rs houl d, th e r e fo r e , b e a p p lie d r e tr o a c tiv e ly to p e r m it th e d is tr ic t c o u r t to r e s e n te n c e h im w i tho utthe enhancem ent s m ade t o h i s s ent ence base d o n p ri or conv i cti on s und er3

U . S . S . G . § 4B 1. 1. T he di s tr i c tc our tde ni e d the m oti on a f t e rf i ndi ng tha tthe B ooke rde c i s i on di d nota ppl y r e tr oa c ti ve l y . T ur ne r ’ s noti c e of a ppe a l s ought r e v ie w o f

th e d e n ia l o f

h is § 3 5 8 2 ( c ) ( 2 ) m o tio n . O n a ppe a l , T ur ne rdoe s nota ppe art o r a i s e the s a m e c l a i m s he r a i s e d i n the d is tr ic t c o u r t. R a th e r , h e a r g u e s p r o s e th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t e rr e d b y e n h a n c in g h is se nt ence un der U . S . S . G . § 4 B 1. 1 b ec ause he on l y had on e pri or control l ed s ubs t a nc e c onvi c ti on. H e f ur the rr a i s e s ac l a i m of

“ a c tua l i nnoc e nc e ” be c a us e he d id n o t m e e t th e c r ite r iafo rb e in g a“c ar e e ro f fe n d e r .” L a s tly , h e a r g u e s th a t h is tri alcoun se l w as i neff

ec ti ve for fai l i ng t o o bj ec tt o the care eroffe nd er e nha nc e m e nta ts e nt e nc i ng. W e c o n c lu d e th a t T u r n e rab a n d o n e d h is o r ig in a l ar g u m e n t r e g ar d in g h is § 3582( c ) ( 2) m oti on by fa i l i ng t o of fe ra ny a r gum e nti n hi s br i e f . U ni t e d S t a t e s v. C u n n in g h a m , 1 6 1 F .3 d 1 3 4 3 , 1 3 4 4 ( 1 1 th C ir . 1 9 9 8 ) . F u r th e r m o r e , w e d e c lin e to ad d ress an y o f th e arg u m en t s rai sed fo r th e fi rstti m e i n T u rn er’ s b ri ef b ecau se the s e a r gum e nt s a r e § 2255 i s s ue s , a nd, a s he ha s pr e vi ous l y f i l e d a§ 2255 m oti on i n di s tr i c tc our t , he fa i l e d t o pr ope r l y f i l e am oti on s e e ki ng thi s C our t ’ s pe r m i s s i on t o rai se the ar gu m ent s a s r equi re d b y s t atut e. S ee 28 U . S . C . §§ 22 44 (b)( 3)(A )- (B ), 2 2 5 5 . AF F I RME D.