alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION CERTIFICATION I, Robert V. Deutsch, Chief Financial Officer of CNA Financial Corporation, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CNA Financial Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation;
andc)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Dated:  April 30, 2004
    By
    /s/ Robert V. DeutschRobert V. DeutschChief Financial Officer
#### 113 Hillside Avenue Corporation, Appellant, v. Village of Westbury et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 20, 1966, modified, on the law, by (1) striking out its first decretal paragraph, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as to building permit No. 6578 and (2) substituting therefor a declaration that the issuance of said permit by the defendant Building Inspector of the defendant village was unauthorized and unlawful. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The trial court’s findings of fact are affirmed. The Board of Trustees of the defendant village was without power to review the acts of the Building Inspector in granting the permits; that power is vested exclusively in the Board of Appeals of the village. The purported revocation was ineffective (Village Law, § 179-b; Westbury Zoning Ordinance, §§ 50-150, 50-154; see *Matter of Kalen,*248 App. Div. 777). The remedy of direct administrative review of the action by the Board of Trustees was not available; hence plaintiff’s suit was properly brought. Plaintiff sought a declaration that both permits issued to it were in full force and effect. However, the application for permit No. 6578 did not conform to the “front yard” requirements of the Zoning Ordinance of the village. The issuance of this permit by the Building Inspector was, therefore, unlawful, and the Special Term so decided. Dismissal of the complaint, however, was incorrect; defendants were entitled to a declaration that the.permit was invalid *(Lanza*v. *Wagner,*11 N Y 2d 317, 334, app. dsmd. 371 U. S. 74; *Martin*v. *State Idq. Auth.,*43 Misc 2d 682, 690, affd. 15 N Y 2d 707). Ughetta, Acting P. J. Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Universal Bioenergy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vince M. Guest, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



(1)   The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)   The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|Registrant              |     | UNIVERSAL
                           BIOENERGY, INC.
|----------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                        |     |                                                     
|Date: September 2, 2011 | By: | /s/ Vince M. Guest                                  
|                        |     | Vince M. Guest                                      
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer (Pinciple Executive Officer)
#### § 1212.61 Independent evaluation.

The Board must authorize and fund not less than once every five years an independent evaluation of the effectiveness of this subpart and the plans and programs conducted by the Board under the Act. The Board must submit this independent evaluation to the Secretary and make the results available to the public.
PUBLIC LAW 109–160—DEC. 30, 2005 119 STAT. 2957

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2167 (H.R. 4647):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Dec. 21, considered and passed Senate.

Dec. 22, considered and passed House, amended. Senate concurred in House

amendment.

Æ

Public Law 109–160

109th Congress

An Act

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset of certain provisions

of that Act and the lone wolf provision of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism

Prevention Act of 2004 to July 1, 2006.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SUNSET OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE

USA PATRIOT ACT AND THE LONE WOLF PROVISION OF

THE INTELLIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM PREVENTION ACT OF 2004.

Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening America by

Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct

Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001 (18 U.S.C. 2510 note)

is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘February 3, 2006’’.

Approved December 30, 2005.

Dec. 30, 2005

[S. 2167]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1246 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1246

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 10, 2024

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To authorize leases of up to 99 years for land held in trust for 
                  federally recognized Indian Tribes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBE LEASING AUTHORITY.

    Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 
(69 Stat. 539, chapter 615; 25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended, in the 
second sentence, by inserting ``, land held in trust for any other 
Indian tribe included on the list published by the Secretary pursuant 
to section 104 of the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 
1994 (25 U.S.C. 5131)'' after ``Chehalis Reservation''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 9, 2024.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 51709 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 51710 1989HeinOnline -- 54 Fed. Reg. 51711 1989
#### § 1230.20 Pork product.

*Pork product* means an edible product produced or processed in whole or in part from pork.
#### § 1219.76 Amendments.

Amendments to this subpart may be proposed, from time to time, by the Board or by any interested persons affected by the provisions of the Act, including the Secretary. Except for changes in the assessment rate, the provisions of the Act applicable to the Order are applicable to any amendment of the Order.
§ 1221.124 Reports. ( a ) Each first handler, on a State-by-State basis, will be required to provide to the Board periodically such information as may be required by the Board, with the approval of the Secretary, which may include but not be limited to the following: ( 1 ) Number of bushels or tons of domestic sorghum within the State that were marketed to the first handler;
( 2 ) Number of bushels or tons of domestic sorghum within the State on which an assessment was paid;
( 3 ) The amount of assessments remitted on sorghum within the State;
( 4 ) Date that any assessments were paid within the State;
( 5 ) The explanation, if necessary, to show why the remittance is less than the applicable assessment rate multiplied by the net market price multiplied by the number of bushels or tons within the State that were marketed to the first handler; and
( 6 ) The first handler's tax identification number.
( b ) Each importer will be required to provide to the Board periodically such information as may be required by the Board, with the approval of the Secretary, which may include but not be limited to the following: ( 1 ) Number of bushels or tons of sorghum imported;
( 2 ) Number of bushels or tons of imported sorghum on which an assessment was paid;
( 3 ) The amount of assessments remitted;
( 4 ) Date that any assessments were paid;
( 5 ) The explanation, if necessary, to show why the remittance is less than the applicable assessment rate multiplied by the net market value; and
( 6 ) The importer's tax identification number.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Victims, Judges, and Juvenile Court Reform Through Restorative Justice      

# Victims, Judges, and Juvenile Court Reform Through Restorative Justice

This Bulletin discusses the expansion of the role of victims in juvenile courts through the increased use of Restorative Justice.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/ovc_archives/bulletins/vjj_10_2000_2/vjj_back.html
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 1421
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart E of part 1421 appear at 74 FR 15656, Apr. 7, 2009.

§ 1421.419 MAL or LDP servicing. ( a ) The DMA is responsible for servicing MALs and are required to take the following actions: ( 1 ) Send the producer a maturity notice letter before MAL maturity.
( 2 ) Maintain the MAL or LDP documents according to FSA requirements.
( 3 ) Transmit the necessary funds to repay the MAL to FSA.
( b ) FSA will process the CCC release of paper receipts or EWRs where such a release is appropriate.
[70 FR 33799, June 10, 2005. Redesignated at 74 FR 15656, Apr. 7, 2009;80 FR 129, 130, Jan. 2, 2015]
#### § 1217.9 Export.

*Export* means to manufacture and ship softwood lumber from within the United States to locations outside of the United States.
#### 970.0407 Contractor records retention.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Resource: SAMHSA’s Data Archive

This website features SAMHSA data collections, maps, reports, public use data files, analysis tools, and other information related to data. Users can browse by topic or publication type and request data based on a specific need. 

http://www.samhsa.gov/data/?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resources
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1429.113 Maintaining records.

Producers applying for payment through the Asparagus Revenue Market Loss Assistance Payment Program must maintain records and accounts to document all eligibility requirements specified in this part. Such records and accounts must be retained for 3 years after the date of payment.
Warrant Amendment


 


 


 


Warrant Amendment effective as of April
1, 2012 by and between POW! Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) and Stanley L. Compton, Trustee of the Compton Family
Trust dated April 11, 1988 (the “Holder”).


 


Introduction. The Company issued
the Holder a warrant to purchase 350,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to the terms of a Warrant Agreement dated January
1, 2010 (the “2010 Agreement”). The Company and Holder wish to amend the 2010 Agreement as provided below.


 


1     Amendment.
For good and valuable consideration receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Holder agree that the “Expiration
Date” as defined in Section 2 of the 2010 Agreement be amended to be December 31, 2017


 


2.    Miscellaneous.
Except for the amendment provided in section 1 above, the 2010 Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


 


 





	 	POW! Entertainment, Inc.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Gill Champion                                       
	 	       	Gill Champion, Chief Operating Officer
	 	 	 
	 	Agreed and Accepted:
	 	 
	 	Stanley L. Compton, Trustee of the Compton

                    Family Trust dated April 11, 1988

	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Stanley L. Compton                             
	 	        	Stanley L. Compton
Need to return call by / at/between and

. Signature:

___________________________ Project No.: 0317.02.029.033 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: Steam Electric ELG 

### CBI?

Yes

x 

### No TELEPHONE CALL RECOR D

Incoming

x Outgoing Date: 9/ 24/2015 Time: 1:00 am

x pm

Company Name: United Conveyor Corporation (UCC) ERG Staff Name: Elizabeth Gentile

Contact Name: UCC Contact Phone Number: Conference Call

General Subject: Bottom Ash Complete Recycle

– Cost Estimates



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On Thursday, September 24, 2015, I participated in a call with Ron Jordan, EPA, and UCC to discuss bottom

ash complete recycle systems, specifically remote mechanical drag systems (MDS). UCC explained that

typically a surge tank, return water pumps, and piping would be required to recycle bottom ash transport water

from the remote MDS back to the boiler to eliminate the discharge of bottom ash transport water. UCC

provided the following capital cost estimates for the equipment:

- Surge tank: $250,000

- $500,000

- Set of r eturn water pumps: $2,000,000

- Carbon steel return piping (and miscell aneous hardware): $50,000

UCC explained that typically the plant would install one surge tank, one set of return water pumps, and carbon

steel return piping (listed above) for each set of two remote MDS trains installed at the plant. Therefore, for

every two remote MDS installation s, the capital cost incurred for the equipment listed above would be

approximately $2,500,000, with an installation cost of $5,000,000 (total $7,500,000).

Further, UCC explained that there are two key components in determining th e number of remote MDS

installations required at a plant: sluice flow rate (in gallons per minute) and the number of generating units at

the plant. UCC provided the following rule of thumb for estimating the number of recommended remote MDS

installations f

or a plant based on the number of generating units:

- 1 generating unit: 1 or 2 remote MDS installations

- 2 generating units: 2 remote MDS installations

- 3 generating units: 2 remote MDS installations

- 4 generating units: 3 remote MDS installations

- 5 generating units: 4 remote MDS installations

UCC noted that the number of generating units at the plant may not dictate the total number of remote MDS

installations if the plant has a different number of sluice lines than generating units. For example, some plants

operate one or two sluicing lines for more than two generating units.
Order 2012

- 10

- 17 Served: October 12, 2012



### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 12 th of October, 2012

Essential Air Service at

AKUTAN

, ALASKA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET OST

- 200 0

- 7068

Order Extending Service Obligation

S ummary By this Order, the Department extends the Essential Air Serv i ce (EAS) ob l igation of Peninsula Airways, Inc., (PenAir) at Akutan Alaska, for an additional 30 days, though December 3, 2012.

Background

Order 2011

- 3

- 31, March 25, 2011, reselected PenAir to provide EAS at Akutan for an annual subsidy rate of $654,964 through April 30, 2013. Under that contract, Akutan is to receive eleven nonstop round trips per week year round to Dutch harbor with 9

- seat
Grumman Goose aircraft. On August 2, 2012, PenAir filed a 90

- day notice of intent to suspend its subsidized EAS at Akutan, Alaska. By Order 2012

- 8

- 39, August 31, 2012, we prohibited PenAir from suspending service through November 3, 2012 . In

accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 41734 (c) , we must extend PenAir’s service obligation for an additional 30 days, or until replacement service actually begins, whichever occurs first.

This Order is issued under authority assigned in 14 CFR Part 385.12(k)(5)

.

Accordingly,

1. We require Peninsula Airways, Inc., to maintain the level of Essential A ir S ervice it was selected to provide by Order 2011

- 3

- 31, the same level it was providing when it filed notice; ”

2. Th i s docket will remain open until further order of the Depart m ent; and

3. We will serve a copy of this O rder on the State of Alaska, and the civic officials of Akutan, Alaska, and on Peninsula Airways;Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this order under the Department’s Regula tions, 14 CFR Part 385.30 must file such petitions within ten (10) days after the date of service of this order.

This Order will be effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review shall not preclude its effectiveness.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN

Director Office of Aviation Analysis

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov
#### § 1124.76 Payments by a handler operating a partially regulated distributing plant.

See § 1000.76.