alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-776-779 (Fourth Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on preserved mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on August 3, 2020 (85 FR 46725) and determined on November 6, 2020 that it would conduct expedited reviews (86 FR 7877, February 2, 2021).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on March 1, 2021. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5167 (March 2021), entitled                     *Preserved Mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia: Investigation Nos. 731-TA-776-779 (Fourth Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: March 2, 2021.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2021-04613 Filed 3-4-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Revolutionary Concepts,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Garry Stevenson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C.

ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of

the Company.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certificationas of the

23th day of May, 2011.

 

 

/s/ Garry Stevenson

------------------------------

Chief Financial Officer
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43455

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MICHAEL KENNETH MURPHY, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 330

Filed: January 19, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Latah County. Hon. John R. Stegner, District Judge. 

Judgment relinquishing jurisdiction and imposing sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jenevieve C. Swinford, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori Anne Fleming, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Michael Kenneth Murphy Jr. pleaded guilty to burglary, Idaho Code §§ 18-1401, 18-

1403. The district court imposed a unified five-year sentence, with two years determinate, but 

after a period of retained jurisdiction, suspended the sentence and placed Murphy on probation. 

Subsequently, Murphy admitted to violating the terms of the probation, and the district court 

consequently revoked probation and ordered execution of the original sentence, but retained 

jurisdiction a second time. After Murphy’s period of retained jurisdiction, the district court 

suspended the sentence and placed him on probation. Subsequently, Murphy admitted to 

violating the terms of his probation again and the district court revoked probation and ordered 

execution of the original sentence, but retained jurisdiction for a third time. Prior to completing
2

the rider program, the district court relinquished jurisdiction and executed the original sentence. 

Murphy appeals, contending that the district court abused its discretion by relinquishing 

jurisdiction and executing the underlying five-year sentence, with two years fixed.

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to 

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district 

court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood, 102 

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee, 117 Idaho 203, 205-06, 786 P.2d 594, 596-

97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the 

information before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. 

Applying the foregoing standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot 

say that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdiction and ordering 

execution of Murphy’s sentence. Therefore, the judgment relinquishing jurisdiction and 

imposing sentence is affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Winston Lloyd D. Catholic Home Bureau for Dependent Children, Respondent; Moya K., Also Known as Moya D., Appellant. In the Matter of Danisha Amoy C. Catholic Home Bureau for Dependent Children, Respondent; Moya K., Also Known as Moya D., Appellant. In the Matter of Colton Richard D. Catholic Home Bureau for Dependent Children, Respondent; Moya K., Also Known as Moya D., Appellant.

[777 NYS2d 175]

In three related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of mental illness, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kangs County (Lim, J.), dated October 8, 2002, which, after a fact-finding hearing, terminated her parental rights with respect to the three children and transferred custody and *707guardianship of the children to the Catholic Home Bureau for Dependent Children and the Administration for Children’s Services for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as pertains to the child Winston Lloyd D. is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, since he reached the age of majority *(see Matter of Francisco Anthony C. F., Jr.,*305 AD2d 410 [2003]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner agency established by clear and convincing evidence that the mother, presently and for the foreseeable future, will be unable to provide proper and adequate care for her children by reason of mental illness *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [3] [g]; [4] [c]; [6] [a]). The court-appointed psychiatrist interviewed the mother twice and reviewed the medical records pertaining to her out-patient treatment at Brooklyn Psychiatric Centers, her hospitalization at Bronx Lebanon Hospital, and from the petitioner’s doctors. Based on the interviews and medical records, the psychiatrist testified that the mother suffers from paranoid schizophrenia. The psychiatrist opined that due to the chronic nature of the illness, the mother’s symptoms, and her lack of insight about her illness, the children, if returned to the mother, would be at risk of being neglected in the present and foreseeable future. This evidence supported the Family Court’s determination *(see Matter of Ernesto Thomas A.,*5 AD3d 380 [2004]; *Matter of Jon C.,*305 AD2d 592 [2003]; *Matter of Pariis L.,*286 AD2d 501 [2001]).

Because the petition was granted on the ground of mental illness, the Family Court was not required to hold a dispositional hearing *(see Matter of Joyce T.,*65 NY2d 39, 46 [1985]; *Matter of Pauline Y.,*193 AD2d 686, 687 [1993]).

The mother’s remaining contention is without merit. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Advances in Supporting Kinship Caregivers Podcast Series      

# Resource: Advances in Supporting Kinship Caregivers Podcast Series

Episodes one and two of the new five-part podcast series entitled *Advances in Supporting Kinship Caregivers* are now available. The first episode features a discussion of Rhode Island’s approach to kinship support services and the second episode focuses on Washington State’s approach to providing kinship support services. Topics discussed in the two episodes include but are not limited to: 
                  -  Why kinship caregivers should be treated differently by agencies and caseworkers, and the specific challenges kinship caregivers face.  
                  -  How to strengthen relationships between caseworkers and kinship caregivers.  
                  -  Differences in formal and informal kinship caregivers and the differences caseworkers may have to navigate when working with each.  
                  -  Cultural considerations caseworkers and others should be aware of when working with rural Latinx communities and families.  

Episodes are available on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Stitcher, and SoundCloud.
August 8, 2016

Mr. Brian Foster

Brian Foster

11592 Coldwater Road

Truckee, CA 96161

Re: FAA–2016–4923

Dear Mr. Foster:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
Exhibit 13.1

Wipro Limited

Certification of
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Azim H. Premji, Executive Chairman and Managing Director of Wipro Limited, hereinafter referred to as the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Azim H. PremjiAzim H. PremjiExecutive Chairman and Managing Director(Principal Executive Officer)


I, Jatin Pravinchandra Dalal, Chief Financial Officer of Wipro Limited, hereinafter
referred to as the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jatin Pravinchandra DalalJatin Pravinchandra DalalChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


Date: June 2, 2017
§ 1209.60 Reports. ( a ) Each producer marketing mushrooms of that person's own production directly to consumers, and each first handler responsible for the collection of assessments under § 1209.51(a) shall be required to report monthly to the Council, on a form provided by the Council, such information as may be required under this subpart or any rules and regulations issued thereunder. Such information shall include, but not be limited to, the following: ( 1 ) The first handler's name, address, and telephone number;
( 2 ) Date of report, which is also the date of payment to the Council;
( 3 ) Period covered by the report;
( 4 ) The number of pounds of mushrooms purchased, initially transferred, or that in any other manner are subject to the collection of assessments, and a copy of a certificate of exemption, claiming exemption under § 1209.52 from those who claim such exemptions;
( 5 ) The amount of assessments remitted; and
( 6 ) The basis, if necessary, to show why the remittance is less than the number of pounds of mushrooms determined under paragraph (a)(4) multiplied by the applicable assessment rate.
( b ) If determined necessary by the Council and approved by the Secretary, each importer shall file with the Council periodic reports, on a form provided by the Council, containing at least the following information: ( 1 ) The importer's name, address, and telephone number;
( 2 ) The quantity of mushrooms entered or withdrawn for consumption in the United States during the period covered by the report; and
( 3 ) The amount of assessments paid to the U.S. Customs Service at the time of such entry or withdrawal.
( c ) The words *final report* shall be shown on the last report at the end of each fiscal year.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;
 4.
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal control over financial reporting.
 5
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs
auditors and the audit committee of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date:
May 20, 2007
    
    /s/ Tom Lynch

Tom Lynch, President (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 12.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Randy Buchamer, Chief Financial Officer of Bradner Ventures Ltd., certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Bradner Ventures Ltd.; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.             The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.             The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  May 31, 2006

/s/ Randy Buchamer

Randy Buchamer 

Chief Financial Officer 

(Principal Financial Officer)