alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 22, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20011

Summary Calendar

MARIA CHRISTINA SALGADO

Petitioner - Appellant

v. 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS

Respondent - Appellee

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CV-2639

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Maria Christina Salgado, formerly federal prisoner # 13556-

179, appeals the dismissal of her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

wherein she argued that cancellation of the Intensive Corrections

Center (ICC)/Boot Camp program violated the “notice-and-comment”

requirement of the Administrative Procedures Act, her due process

rights, and the Ex Post Facto Clause. Salgado sought a reduction

in “actual prison time” amounting to her immediate release from

prison. The district court denied her petition on the merits. 
No. 06-20011

-2-

Salgado was released from prison while the instant appeal

was pending. An appeal is not moot simply because a § 2241

petitioner is no longer in custody. Brown v. Resor, 407 F.2d

281, 283 (5th Cir. 1969). However, an action is moot when the

court cannot grant the relief requested by the moving party. See

Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987) (holding

that an appeal from the denial of a § 2241 application was moot

because “[t]he main thrust” of Bailey’s application was to be

released from confinement, and “[b]ecause Bailey was released . .

. this court [could] no longer provide him with that relief”);

see also Willy v. Administrative Review Board, 423 F.3d 483, 494

n.50 (5th Cir. 2006) (“If an event occurs that prevents us from

granting ‘any effectual relief whatever’ to a prevailing party,

the controversy is moot, and the appeal must be dismissed.”)

(internal quotation marks and citation omitted). 

Salgado admits that there were no errors at her sentencing.

Rather, the main thrust of Salgado’s petition is to be released

from her confinement based on purported errors that occurred

after she was sentenced. See Bailey, 821 F.2d at 278. Salgado’s

appeal is DISMISSED as moot.
| Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------------|

| (1)       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |                                                                                                                                                  |
| (2)       | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |
|                     |                                                                                                                                                  |
|                     | Dated this 12   day of November, 2010                                                                                                       |   |
|                     |                                                                                                                                                  |

|    | “Robert M. Baker”                              |   |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|         | Robert M. Baker                                       |
|         | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   |
§ 1205.401 Definitions. ( a ) *Cotton Division. Cotton Division* means the Cotton Division of the Agricultural Marketing Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
( b ) *Director. Director* means the Director of the Cotton Division.
[32 FR 1084, Jan. 31, 1967, as amended at 41 FR 37092, Sept. 2, 1976]
Exhibit 99-6

Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code
----
         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report of
Form 10-Q of PECO Energy Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003,
that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of PECO Energy Company.



Date:  May 2, 2003                       /s/ Robert S. Shapard
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Robert S. Shapard
                                         Executive Vice President and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         Exelon Corporation
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

!"a$

!"c$

!"c$

!"a$ White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

± Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

?¿

?Â

Aã

?3⁄4

Iz

I}

Iv

Iv

Iz

Map 2-1

Agua Fria National

Monument / BradshawHarquahala Planning Area

Split Estate Minerals

Alternative A

(Current Management)

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Federally Administered

Mineral Resources Located on

Non Federally Administered Surface

Federal All Mineral

Federal Oil & Gas

Federal Other Mineral
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: WISQARS Fatal Injury Mapping      

# Resource: WISQARS Fatal Injury Mapping

This update to the Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS) includes 2008–2014 fatal injury mapping data. The mapping module allows public health and other professionals in the injury prevention field to produce customized, color-coded maps depicting injury-related death rates throughout the U.S. 

http://wisqars.cdc.gov:8443/cdcMapFramework/?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_content=Reports-and-Resources
§ 1220.619 Time and Place for Requesting a Referendum. ( a ) The opportunity to request a referendum shall be provided during a 4-week period beginning and ending on a date determined by the Secretary. Eligible persons shall have the opportunity to request a referendum by following the procedures in § 1220.622 during the normal business hours of each county FSA office.
( b ) Producers can determine the location of county FSA offices by contacting the nearest county FSA office in their State or by an online search of FSA Web sites.
( c ) Each eligible person shall request a referendum in the county FSA office where FSA maintains and processes the producer's, corporation's, or other entities administrative farm records. For the producer, corporation, or other entity not participating in FSA programs, the opportunity to request a referendum would be provided at the county FSA office serving the county where the producer, corporation, or other legal entity owns or rents land. An individual or authorized representative of a corporation who grows soybeans in more than one county would request a referendum in the county FSA office where the individual or corporation or other entity does most of its business.
[69 FR 13461, Mar. 23, 2004, as amended at 79 FR 12039, Mar. 4, 2014]
1 Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases

on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."

Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-60068

Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

MARJORIE A. HANSEN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee.

______________________________________________________

Appeal from the decision of the

United States Tax Court

(93 5495)

______________________________________________________

September 18, 1995

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:1

The taxpayer, Marjorie Hansen, challenges the Tax Court’s

order denying her theft loss deduction which she claimed on her

1988 federal income tax return.

A burglary occurred in the Hansen residence in 1988 and

jewelry was stolen. Taxpayer's husband was reimbursed for some of

the stolen items by his insurer. In taxpayer’s 1991 return, she

claimed a theft loss for a number of items including some of the
2

items for which her husband was reimbursed. Petitioner did not

produce receipts for the items reported on her return, however, she

sought to establish the cost of some of these items by her oral

testimony. Petitioner also produced receipts for additional items

of jewelry she now claims were also stolen in the burglary.

The Tax Court did not find the petitioner’s testimony

credible. It was not persuaded that the items not listed on the

return were stolen. The Tax Court was entitled to make this

credibility call and we will not disturb it.

 As to the claimed items, petitioner presented no evidence of

the fair market value of these items. While the Tax Court had

considerable latitude in estimating fair market value of the items

from their cost,it was not obliged to do so. See Williams v.

United States, 245 F.2d 559 (5th Cir. 1957).

For the above reasons, the judgment of the Tax Court is

affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ramon Chimelis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries V, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 20, 2009

/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

President (Principal Executive Officer)
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

CHANTEL LOTASHA COLEMAN, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D15-79 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed December 30, 2015. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco 

County; Pat Siracusa, Judge. 

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Brooke Elvington, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

 In this Anders1 appeal, Chantel Coleman appeals her convictions and 

sentences in three cases. We affirm without prejudice to any right Coleman may have 

to file a postconviction motion raising the claims she raised in her motion to withdraw 

 1Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 
- 2 - 

plea filed after this appeal was initiated. The trial court properly dismissed the motion 

because this appeal divested the trial court of jurisdiction to consider the motion. See 

Sharp v. State, 884 So. 2d 510, 512 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Wilson v. State, 814 So. 2d 

1203, 1204 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). 

 We remand for correction of a scrivener's error on the written judgment in 

circuit court case number 14-5604. The judgment lists the offense as "GRAND THEFT 

3F" and correctly cites section 812.014(2)(c)(1), but it incorrectly lists the degree as a 

"First Degree Felony." Coleman was charged with third-degree grand theft in violation 

of section 812.014(2)(c)(1), Florida Statutes (2014), which "is grand theft of the third 

degree and a felony of the third degree." Accordingly, the judgment in circuit court case 

number 14-5604 should be amended to reflect that the offense of grand theft is a thirddegree felony. 

 Affirmed; remanded. 

 

ALTENBERND, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rosa PENALOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40509

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

*418PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rosa Penaloza raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *petition for cert. filed*(Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 114 (Monday, June 15, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 34109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14303]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0198; Airspace Docket No. 14-AGL-8]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; South Dakota

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the NPRM published in the Federal 
Register on May 6, 2014, proposing to amend Class E airspace in the 
State of South Dakota. The FAA has determined that withdrawal of the 
NPRM is warranted as additional analysis is needed.

DATES: The proposed rule published May 6, 2014 (79 FR 25755) is 
withdrawn as of June 15, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raul Garza, Jr., Central Service 
Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 
817-222-4075.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An NPRM was published in the Federal 
Register of May 6, 2014 (79 FR 25755) to amend Title 14 Code of Federal 
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by amending Class E Airspace extending 
upward from 1,200 feet above the surface in the State of South Dakota, 
to enable Minneapolis ARTCC to have greater latitude to use radar 
vectors and/or altitude changes that would provide a more efficient use 
of airspace within the NAS. Additional analysis is needed; therefore 
the NPRM is being withdrawn.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Withdrawal

    In consideration of the foregoing, the NPRM for FR Doc. FAA-2014-
0198, Airspace Docket No. 14-AGL-8, as published in the Federal 
Register of May 6, 2014 (79 FR 25755) (FR Doc. 2014-10335) is hereby 
withdrawn.

     Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 
10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 26, 2015.
Robert W. Beck,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015-14303 Filed 6-12-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: A Quarter Century of Changes in the Elementary and Secondary Teaching Force: From 1987 to 2012      

# Report: A Quarter Century of Changes in the Elementary and Secondary Teaching Force: From 1987 to 2012

This report illustrates changes in several key characteristics of the teaching force between the 1987-1988 and 2011-2012 school years, including the number of teachers, the level of teaching experience, and the racial/ethnic diversity of the teaching force. The report focuses on how these demographic changes varied across different types of teachers and schools.

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017092&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources