alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1221.6 Crop year.

*Crop year* means the time period by which the USDA reports crop production for sorghum and is indicated by the calendar year in which sorghum is normally harvested.
\



### lC1

## J FEB**~** 

### I P i: 

### 30 SERVED: JANUARY 31,2013**r~-- -~-**  --- ---- ···----------- --· -. -1 I !

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### BADGER HELICOPTERS, INC. FAA DOCKETNo. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) DMS No. FAA-2012-0201
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OnMarch 15,2012,the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed a Complaint. OnMarch 8, 2012, Respondent Badger Helicopters, Inc. ("Respondent") had requested a hearing. On January 31, 2013, Complainant moved to withdraw its Complaint and dismiss the case, citing settlement. 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a pmiy withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal ofComplaint having beenread and considered, it is**ORDER~D** as follows:2

1. Complainant's Withdrawal ofComplaint be and is hereby**grant~d;** and 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List3

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430
. Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1



### Michael Jacob, President Badger Helicopters, Inc., Respondent 

### 24564 Hwy 16/385 Custer, SD 57730 ONE COPY



### Agnes M. Rodriguez, Complainant's Counsel 

### Senior Attorney, Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington,DC 20591 TEL: 202-267-7268 FAJ(: 202-267-5106 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E, Room E11-310 Washington, DC 20590 TEL: Attorney-Advisor: 202-366-2139 StaffAssistant**202~366~5121** 

### FAJ(: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0201 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 1210.342 Exemption from assessment. ( a ) The Board may exempt watermelons used for nonfood purposes from the provisions of this Plan and shall establish adequate safeguards against improper use of such exemptions.
( b ) Importers of less than 150,000 pounds of watermelons per year shall be entitled to apply for a refund that is equal to the rate of assessment paid by domestic producers.
( c ) The Secretary may adjust the quantity of the weight exemption specified in paragraph (b) of this section on the recommendation of the Board after an opportunity for public notice and comment to reflect significant changes in the 5-year average yield per acre of watermelons produced in the United States.
( d ) The Board shall have the authority to establish rules, with the approval of the Secretary, for certifying whether a person meets the definition of a producer under section 1210.306.
[54 FR 24545, June 8, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 10799, Feb. 28, 1995]
p130168.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0168

Focus Ready Draft 1/3/2013

ENGINEER: Arnold \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: Chemical intermediate used for manufacturing a

lubricant additive. 

 

 

 

Page 1
p130168.eng

SAT (concerns) (12/21/2012):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P1B2T1 .

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb.)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0168

Manufacturing: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 1 

Days/yr: 5

Basis: 

Page 2
p130168.eng

--> Filtration ---> Loading in totes. (per submission)

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Incineration or Landfill

Conservative: 2.0E+2 kg/site-day over 5 days/yr from 1

site

or 1.0E+3 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL

1.0E+3 kg/yr - all sites

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0168

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 1 

Days/yr: 250

Basis:

 

Page 3
p130168.eng

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Incineration or Landfill

High End: 4.0E+0 kg/site-day over 25 days/yr from 1 site

or 1.0E+2 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL

1.0E+2 kg/yr - all sites

Page 4
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, James Sikora, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tao Minerals Ltd.
      for the period ended October 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Tao Minerals Ltd.                                                                   

Dated: December 18, 2009

| | /s/
      James Sikora       
| | -----------------------------
| | James Sikora                 
| | President and Director       
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | Tao Minerals Ltd.            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tao Minerals
Ltd. and will be retained by Tao Minerals Ltd. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Best Practices Guide for Tribal Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention      

# Resource: Best Practices Guide for Tribal Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention

This resource (PDF, 132 pages) for organizations and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities features a summary of the burden of motor vehicle crash injury and death among the AI/AN community. It also provides recommended strategies, with examples from Indian Country, to increase seat belt use, increase child safety seat use, and reduce alcohol-impaired driving. 

http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/pdf/native/tmvip_best-practices_guide_2016-a.pdf?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1325 

To permit aliens seeking asylum to be eligible for employment in the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2023 

Ms. PINGREE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit aliens seeking asylum to be eligible for 

employment in the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asylum Seeker Work 

5 Authorization Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION FOR ALIENS SEEK7 ING ASYLUM. 

8 Paragraph (2) of section 208(d) of the Immigration 

9 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(d)) is amended to 

10 read as follows: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1325 IH

1 ‘‘(2) EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION.— 

2 ‘‘(A) ELIGIBILITY.—The Secretary of 

3 Homeland Security shall authorize employment 

4 for an applicant for asylum who is not in deten5 tion and whose application for asylum has not 

6 been determined frivolous. 

7 ‘‘(B) APPLICATION.—An applicant for asy8 lum who is not otherwise eligible for employ9 ment authorization shall not be granted such 

10 authorization prior to 30 days after the date of 

11 filing of the application for asylum. 

12 ‘‘(C) TERM.—Employment authorization 

13 for an applicant for asylum shall be valid until 

14 the date on which an applicant is issued a final 

15 denial of the applicable application, including 

16 administrative and judicial review.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
# Evidence table

# References in Table
<PAGE>


Exhibit 23.1
                     CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TO: American IDC Corp.

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of American IDC Corp. for the year ended
December 31, 2002 of our report dated April 11, 2003 which includes an
explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern, and contained in the Registration
Statement No. 333-107366 of American IDC Corp. Form S-8 under the Securities Act
of 1933 insofar as such report relates to the financial statements of American
IDC Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                   /s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                       Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

McLean, Virginia
March 24, 2004
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40051 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. RENE GARCIA

- MONTEJO, also known as Bibian Garcia

- Montejo , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:17

- CR

- 519

- 1

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rene Garcia

- Montejo pleaded guilty to being found in the United States after being previously removed. The district court sentenced Garcia

- Montejo to 46 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. On appeal, Garcia

- Montejo argues that h is guilty plea is invalid because the district court failed to comply with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(G) by failing to address the “official restraint” element of the offense

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 31, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40051 Document: 00514624963 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/31/2018No. 18

- 40051

2 during the plea colloquy. H e contends that because he was under constant surveillance prior to being apprehended, he was neve r free from official restraint a nd could not have committed the charged offense. Because Garcia

Montejo did not raise this issue before the district court, our review is for plain

error. Unite d States v. Vonn , 535 U.S. 55, 58

- 5 9 (2002). In United States v. Rojas , 770 F.3d 366, 368 (5th Cir. 2014), we stated that we had mentioned but never explicitly adopted the official restraint doctrine. We ordinarily do n ot find plain error where we have no t addressed an issue previously. United States v. Evans , 587 F.3d 667, 671 (5th Cir. 2009). The district court’s admonishment contained all of the elements of a 18 U.S.C. § 1326 violation, and Garcia

- Montejo indicated that he understood those elements. See United States v. Flores

- Peraza , 58 F.3d 164, 166 (5th Cir. 1995). T he admonishments provided by the district court were sufficient under Rule 11(b)(1)(G). See United States v. Lujano

- Perez , 274 F.3d 219, 224 (5th Cir. 2001). Garcia

- Montejo has not s hown that the district court plainly erred under Rule 11(b)(1)(G). See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). AFFIRMED

. Case: 18-40051 Document: 00514624963 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/31/2018
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Share with Youth: AmeriCorps NCCC      

# Share with Youth: AmeriCorps NCCC

AmeriCorps invites young adults ages 18—26 to apply for the AmeriCorps National Civilian Community Corps (NCCC). AmeriCorps NCCC strengthens communities and develops leaders through team-based national and community service.  AmeriCorps NCCC members will support climate change mitigation, build affordable housing, support disaster response efforts, and more.  

Members will receive a living allowance to cover housing, meals, program-related travel, personal expenses, and a limited health benefit. AmeriCorps NCCC graduates will receive an Education Award of approximately $7,000 to be used for student loans or future educational expenses. **Learn more and apply.**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6248

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARC ANTHONY JEFFERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief

District Judge. (5:04-cr-30042-gec-mfu-1; 5:10-cv-80293-gecmfu)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marc Anthony Jeffers, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Mitchell Huber, 

Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Charlottesville, Virginia; Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marc Anthony Jeffers seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Jeffers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
§ 1230.53 Nominee's agreement to serve. Any person nominated to serve on the Board shall file with the Secretary at the time of the nomination a written agreement to: ( a ) Serve on the Board if appointed;
( b ) Disclose any relationship with the Council or a State association or any organization that has a contract with the Board and thereafter disclose, at any time while serving on the Board, any relationship with any organization that applies to the Board for a contract; and
( c ) Withdraw from participation in deliberations, decisionmaking, or voting on matters concerning any entity referred to in paragraph (b) of this section, if an officer or member of the executive committee of such entity.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Benny Morganti, Also Known as Morgan, Ben Hogan, Appellant.

Motion for reargument of appeal denied. See memorandum in *People*v. *Mancuso*(27 A D 2d 643) decided herewith. Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Vecehio, JJ.
#### § 1221.23 Promotion.

*Promotion* means any action taken to present a favorable image of sorghum to the public and the end-user industry for the purpose of improving the competitive position of sorghum and stimulating the sale of sorghum. This includes paid advertising and public relations.
#### Mary Laskowski, appellant, v. Josef Laskowski, appellee.

Gen. No. 34,679.

Opinion filed March 24, 1931.

Erwin E. Cowen, for appellant; Edward McTiernan, of counsel.

Otto Schusterman, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Kerner

delivered the opinion of the court.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Education and Work Plans of U.S. High School Students      

# Report: Education and Work Plans of U.S. High School Students

This report analyzes the education and work plans of a cohort of high school students when they were in 11th grade. The findings show most students expected postsecondary education would be their primary activity, while about one-fifth expected their main activity to be work. A higher proportion of female students expected their main activity to be postsecondary education and students' expectations for postsecondary education increased as family socioeconomic status increased. 

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017005&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
#### § 1150.107 Fiscal period.

*Fiscal period* means the calendar year or such other annual period as the Board may determine.
#### § 1.166 Consent order.

At any time, complainant and respondent may agree to the entry of a consent order. Such order shall be entered by the Judge (prior to a decision) or the Judicial Officer (after a decision by the Judge), and become effective on the date specified therein.