alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1006.61 Computation of uniform prices. On or before the 11th day of each month, the market administrator shall compute a uniform butterfat price, a uniform skim milk price, and a uniform price for producer milk receipts reported for the prior month. The report of any handler who has not made payments required pursuant to § 1006.71 for the preceding month shall not be included in the computation of these prices, and such handler's report shall not be included in the computation for succeeding months until the handler has made full payment of outstanding monthly obligations. ( a ) *Uniform butterfat price.* The uniform butterfat price per pound, rounded to the nearest one-hundredth cent, shall be computed by: ( 1 ) Multiplying the pounds of butterfat in producer milk allocated to each class pursuant to § 1000.44(b) by the respective class butterfat prices;
( 2 ) Adding the butterfat value calculated in § 1006.60(e) for other source milk allocated to Class I pursuant to § 1000.43(d) and the steps of § 1000.44(b) that correspond to § 1000.44(a)(3)(i) and § 1000.44(a)(8) by the Class I price; and
( 3 ) Dividing the sum of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section by the sum of the pounds of butterfat in producer milk and other source milk used to calculate the values in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section.
( b ) *Uniform skim milk price.* The uniform skim milk price per hundredweight, rounded to the nearest cent, shall be computed as follows: ( 1 ) Combine into one total the values computed pursuant to § 1006.60 for all handlers;
( 2 ) Add an amount equal to the minus location adjustments and subtract an amount equal to the plus location adjustments computed pursuant to § 1006.75;
( 3 ) Add an amount equal to not less than one-half of the unobligated balance in the producer-settlement fund;
( 4 ) Subtract the value of the total pounds of butterfat for all handlers. The butterfat value shall be computed by multiplying the sum of the pounds of butterfat in producer milk and other source milk used to calculate the values in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section by the butterfat price computed in paragraph (a) of this section;
( 5 ) Divide the resulting amount by the sum of the following for all handlers included in these computations: ( i ) The total skim pounds of producer milk; and
( ii ) The total skim pounds for which a value is computed pursuant to § 1006.60(e); and
( 6 ) Subtract not less than 4 cents and not more than 5 cents.
( c ) *Uniform price.* The uniform price per hundredweight, rounded to the nearest cent, shall be the sum of the following: ( 1 ) Multiply the uniform butterfat price for the month pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section times 3.5 pounds of butterfat; and
( 2 ) Multiply the uniform skim milk price for the month pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section times 96.5 pounds of skim milk.
[64 FR 47966, Sept. 1, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 82835, Dec. 28, 2000]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Financial Literacy Activities      

# Resource: Financial Literacy Activities

This webpage contains classroom activities designed to help teach and nurture the building blocks of financial capability. Each activity comes with a teacher guide and supporting student material. **Learn more.**
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL VENABLE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3225

[January 10, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 10-001384CF10A.

Michael Venable, Bristol, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Training for School Personnel to Prevent, Prepare, and Respond to School Safety Incidents      

# Resource: Training for School Personnel to Prevent, Prepare, and Respond to School Safety Incidents

This article examines the effectiveness of school violence training provided to school personnel and school-based law enforcement. It discusses four of the most common training topics and the degree of evidence for each and considers future directions for further research. **Learn more.**
C. A. No. 80-55.

#### Henry Matteau *v.*State of Rhode Island *et al.*

*Nugent ir Nugent, J. Joseph Nugent, Jr.,*for plaintiff, *Dennis J. Roberts II,*Attorney General, *Jeffrey B. Pine,*Special Assistant Attorney General, for defendants.

The plaintiff s motion to dismiss this appeal as premature is granted.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1274 

To reauthorize the Lake Tahoe Restoration Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2023 

Mr. AMODEI (for himself, Mrs. LEE of Nevada, Ms. TITUS, Mr. HORSFORD, 

and Mr. GARAMENDI) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Agriculture, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Lake Tahoe Restoration Act, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lake Tahoe Restora5 tion Reauthorization Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1274 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE LAKE TAHOE RESTORA2 TION ACT. 

3 (a) COOPERATIVE AUTHORITIES.—Section 4(f) of the 

4 Lake Tahoe Restoration Act (Public Law 106–506) is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘4 fiscal years following the date of 

6 enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 

7 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘period beginning on the date of en8 actment of this subsection and ending on the date de9 scribed in section 10(a)’’. 

10 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

11 10(a) of the Lake Tahoe Restoration Act (Public Law 

12 106–506) is amended by striking ‘‘for a period’’ and all 

13 that follows through the period at the end and inserting 

14 ‘‘, to remain available until September 30, 2034.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Sheldon Farber, Respondent, v Bankers Trust Company et al., Appellants.

— In an action, *inter alia,*for a permanent injunction, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 10, 1979, which, upon certain conditions, granted plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants from commencing an action to foreclose a mortgage on certain real property located in New Jersey. Order reversed and plaintiffs motion is denied, without costs or disbursements. On this record, it is our view that Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in granting plaintiffs motion for a preliminary- injunction. (See, generally, 7A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, pars 6301.12, 6301.13, 6301.14, 6301.26, 6301.27; cf. *Bankers Trust Co. v Braten Apparel Corp.,*68 AD2d 810, 811.) Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Best Practices to Address Community Gang Problems: OJJDP's Comprehensive Gang Model      

# Best Practices to Address Community Gang Problems: OJJDP's Comprehensive Gang Model

The Comprehensive Gang Model developed by the OJJDP focuses on community prevention and intervention in balance with law enforcement suppression activities. The model involves five strategies for responding to gang-involved youth and their families. These include****community mobilization, opportunities provision, social intervention, suppression, organizational change and development. This brief discusses best practices for implementing the model.

http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/231200.pdf
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. Paul Stitniky, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 33,502.

Opinion filed January 2, 1930.

Trainor & Trainor, for plaintiff in error. John A. Swanson, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error; Edw. E. Wilson and John Holman, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Wilson

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 1209.231 Nominations.

Nominations shall be made at regional caucuses of producers or importers, or by mail ballot in accordance with the procedures prescribed in § 1209.31 of this part. Proxy voting by producers and importers shall not be permitted at a regional caucus or in a mail ballot. Each regional caucus and mail ballot shall be scheduled so as to ensure that the nominations for each position that will be open at the beginning of the following year are received by the Secretary by August 1, or such other date approved by the Secretary.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1410.1 Administration. ( a ) The Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) is administered under the general supervision and direction of the Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), the Administrator, Farm Service Agency (FSA), or a designee, or the Deputy Administrator, FSA; and will be carried out by the FSA State and county committees (“State committees” and “county committees,” respectively).
( b ) State executive directors, county executive directors, and State and county committees do not have the authority to modify or waive any of the provisions in this part unless specifically authorized by the Deputy Administrator.
( c ) The State committee may take any action authorized or required by this part to be taken by the county committee, but which has not been taken by such county committee, including, but not limited to: ( 1 ) Correct or require a county committee to correct any action taken by such county committee that is not in accordance with this part; or
( 2 ) Require a county committee to withhold taking any action that is not in accordance with this part.
( d ) No delegation of authority herein to a State or county committee will preclude the Executive Vice President, CCC, the Administrator, FSA, or a designee, or the Deputy Administrator, from determining any question arising under this part or from reversing or modifying any determination made by a State or county committee.
( e ) Data furnished by producers will be used to determine eligibility for CRP benefits. Furnishing the data is voluntary; however, the failure to provide data could result in CRP benefits being withheld or denied.
( f ) Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, the suitability of land for permanent vegetative or water cover, factors for determining the likelihood of improved water quality, and adequacy of the planned practice to achieve desired objectives will be determined by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) or other sources approved by the Deputy Administrator, in accordance with the Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG) of NRCS or other guidelines deemed appropriate by NRCS. In no case will such determination compel the Deputy Administrator to execute a CRP contract that the Deputy Administrator does not believe will serve the purposes of CRP established by this part. Any approved technical authority will use CRP guidelines established by the Deputy Administrator.
( g ) The regulations in this part apply to all CRP contracts approved after December 6, 2019.
#### In the Matter of Oakley Holmes et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Board of Education of the East Ramapo Central School District et al., Appellants-Respondents.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to compel the Board of Education of the East Ramapo Central School District to restore petitioners to their positions as regularly appointed teachers, the parties cross-appeal from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated September 15, 1977, which, *inter alia,*directed that those petitioners who were probationary teachers on June 30, 1976 be granted credit for services rendered in the 1976-1977 school year and that those petitioners who were tenured teachers on the aforesaid date be granted seniority credit for services rendered in the 1976-1977 school year. Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the provisions permitting this proceeding to be maintained as a "class action” and substituting therefor a provision denying "class action” status. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. There was no warrant for permitting a "class action”, since the appellants-respondents constitute a governmental agency and the outcome of this litigation will serve as a *stare decisis*determination of claims of litigants situated similarly to the individual petitioners herein. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Katherine Gannon, Respondent, v. City of Poughkeepsie, Dept. of Public Works, et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Staley, Jr., J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which held that the decedent died as a result of an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of employment. Decedent was employed as a maintenance employee by the City of Poughkeepsie, New York. He regularly worked a five-day week, but because of a snowstorm, he was called to work on Saturday, February 2, 1963. On that day, he commenced work at 7:00 a.m. and, thereafter, while attempting to open a garage door, he was struck on the shoulder by a large spring that broke loose. He continued to work loading a sand truck which required him to climb up on top of the load and break up frozen lumps of sand, or kick the lumps that could not be broken up off the grid of the truck, and to ride in the truck to the location where the sanding was to be done. About five truck*778loads of sand were used, and approximately 20 trips were taken during the day. About 4:30 p.m., while he was riding in the truck, he started foaming at the mouth, and he died shortly thereafter of coronary thrombosis. The board found that the medical evidence in the record indicated that death from coronary thrombosis was causally related to the strenuous work effort performed by the decedent on February 2, 1963, together with the trauma to the shoulder. The decedent had been in good health prior to his sudden death, and the autopsy showed heart damage in the form of a fresh intraluminal thrombus. Dr. Gibbs and Dr. Goldstein, testifying for the claimant, stated that the strenuous physical exertion that the decedent was subjected to on February 2, 1963, precipitated his fatal heart attack and, in Dr. Gibbs’ opinion, the trauma to the shoulder also contributed to the cause of his death. The manual labor performed by the decedent on an overtime day breaking up frozen lumps of sand in cold, freezing weather was more than normal exertion. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the findings that decedent’s strenuous work and the blow to his shoulder constituted accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment, and that there was a causal relation between the death and the injuries sustained. *(Matter of Masse*v. *Robinson Co.,*301 N. Y. 34; *Matter of Schechter*v. *State Ins. Fund,*6 N Y 2d 506.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum decision by Staley, Jr., J.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Petri, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered August 31, 1977, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
§ 1280.202 Nominations. All nominations authorized under this section shall be made in the following manner: ( a ) Nominations shall be obtained by the Secretary from eligible organizations certified under § 1280.206. Certified eligible organizations representing producers, feeders, first handlers, or seedstock producers shall submit to the Secretary at least two nominees for each seat on the Board. If the Secretary determines that a unit is not represented by a certified eligible organization, then the Secretary may solicit nominations from other organizations or other persons residing in the unit.
( b ) After the establishment of the initial Board, the Department shall announce when a vacancy does or will exist. Nomination for subsequent Board members shall be submitted to the Secretary not less than 60 days prior to the expiration of the terms of the members whose terms are expiring, in the manner as described in this section. In the case of vacancies due to reasons other than the expiration of a term of office, successor Board members shall be appointed pursuant to § 1280.205.
( c ) When there is more than one certified eligible organization representing the unit or when the Secretary solicits nominations from organizations and persons residing in that unit, they may caucus and jointly nominate, two qualified persons for each position representing that unit on the Board for which a member is to be appointed. If joint agreement is not reached with respect to any such nominations, or if no caucus is held, each eligible organization may submit to the Secretary two nominees for each appointment to be made to represent that unit.
#### § 1260.570 Notification of certification and the listing of certified organizations.

Organizations and associations shall be notified in writing as to whether they are eligible to nominate producer members to the Board. A copy of the certification or eligibility determination shall be furnished to certified or eligible organizations and associations. Copies shall also be maintained on file in the Livestock and Seed Division office, where they will be available for inspection.
#### § 1223.70 Right of the Secretary.

All fiscal matters, programs, plans, or projects, rules or regulations, reports, or other substantive actions proposed and prepared by the Board shall be submitted to the Secretary for approval.