alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 
 Compensatory Arrangements for Non-Employee Directors 
 The Board of Directors of
MicroFinancial Incorporated (the “Company”) adopted the following annual compensation package for its non-employee directors, effective for fees and other compensation payable relating to the Company’s fiscal year ended
December 31, 2013 and, unless later amended, for subsequent periods: 
  

	 	•	 	 an annual retainer of $21,500, to be paid at the director’s election either entirely in shares of stock or 40% in cash and 60% in shares of stock,
in each case with full vesting upon the date of issuance; 


  

	 	•	 	 a cash fee of $1,250 for meetings, including committee meetings, not held by telephone and not held on the same day as a full Board meeting;



  

	 	•	 	 committee meeting fees of $500 for telephonic meetings and meetings on the same day as Board meetings; 



 

	 	•	 	 fees for the Chair of the Audit Committee ($10,750 per year), the Compensation and Benefits Committee ($5,500 per year) and the Nominating and
Governance Committee ($5,500 per year), to be paid either entirely in shares of stock or 40% in cash and 60% in shares of stock, in each case with full vesting upon the date of issuance; 



 

	 	•	 	 a fee for the Chairman of the Board of $10,750 per year, to be paid either entirely in shares of stock or 40% in cash and 60% in shares of stock, in
each case with full vesting upon the date of issuance; 


  

	 	•	 	 a stock grant made annually to each non-employee director valued at $45,000 on the date of grant, with all shares of stock fully vested upon the date
of issuance; and 


  

	 	•	 	 health insurance benefits for those non-employee directors who elect to participate, with the cost to be borne partially by the Company, consistent
with its past practices. 


 Committee chairs may decide in their discretion that a meeting is not substantive enough to merit
the committee fees described above.
#### § 1230.13 Market.

*Market* means to sell, slaughter for sale, or otherwise dispose of a porcine animal in commerce.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, John M. Ballbach, certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CDRV Investors, Inc.;

2.    Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| /s/ JOHN  M. BALLBACH                                  |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name: John M. Ballbach                                 |
| Title:* **President  and Chief Executive Officer* |
| Dated: November 14,  2006                         |

 

----
### ATTACHMENT 1 VENTURA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

PROPOSED FINDINGS

PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 40703, 40727, 40727.2, 40728.5 and 40920.6(a) FOR PROPOSED AMENDED RULES 2, 23, 33, 33.1, 35 and 76

1. NECESSITY: Proposed Amended Rules 2, 23, 33, 33 .1, 35 and 76 are needed to implement U.S. EPA’s Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailori ng Rule (40 CFR Parts 51, 52, 70 and 71), 75 Fed. Reg. 31415 (June 3, 2010).

2. AUTHORITY: The Ventura County Air Pollution Con trol District is authorized and required by the California Health and Safety Code D ivision 26, Part 3, Sections 40000 and 40001, to adopt and enforce rules and regulatio ns to meet and maintain state and federal ambient air quality standards.

3. CLARITY: The proposed rules can be easily under stood by the persons directly affected by them.

4. CONSISTENCY: The proposed rules are in harmony and do not conflict with or contradict existing statutes, court decisions, or s tate or federal regulations.

5. NONDUPLICATION: The proposed rules do not impos e the same requirements as an existing state or federal regulation.

6. REFERENCE: California Health and Safety Code Di vision 26, Part 3, Sections 40000, 40001 and 40702 will be implemented by the adoption of proposed amended Rules 2, 23, 33, 33.1, 35 and 76.

7. SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT: Information related to th e socioeconomic impact of proposed amended Rules 2, 23, 33, 33.1, 35 and 76 i s set forth in the attached Staff Report, dated November 4, 2010, and has been consid ered in adopting the rule.

8. ANALYSIS OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS: The proposed rules do not impose the same requirements as any existing fe deral, state or local regulation.
Nicor
      Inc.


Form
      10-Q


Exhibit
      32.02





**CERTIFICATION**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nicor Inc. (the “ Company ”)
      hereby
      certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
      period ended September 30, 2007 (the “ Report ”)
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
                November 1, 2007
            
            /s/
                RICHARD L. HAWLEYRichard
                L. HawleyExecutive
                Vice President and Chief Financial
                Officer
EX-10.5(a)



 Exhibit 10.5(a) 
 June 1, 2012 
 Aspect Capital Ltd. 

Nations House – 8th Floor 
 103
Wigmore Street 
 London W1U 1QS, U.K. 

Attention: Mr. Anthony Todd, CEO 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Todd: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P 


  

	 	•	 	 Global Futures Fund Ltd 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the
address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290. 
  

					
	Very truly yours,
	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Brian Centner

		 	Brian Centner
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director

  

					
	ASPECT CAPITAL LTD.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jonathan
Greenwold



					
		
	Print Name:	 	 Jonathan Greenwold

	BC/sr
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (the Company) hereby
certifies to his knowledge that the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the Report), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K
(Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be
deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Date: March 11, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ THOMAS MCNAUGHTON         
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Thomas McNaughton       
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.2




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with annual report of CIBT Education Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis Huang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that that to my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:

January 15, 2013By:

/s/ Dennis HuangName:

Dennis HuangTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Nicor Inc.
                                                            Form 10-K
                                                            Exhibit 23.01




                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report, dated January 22, 2001, included in this Form 10-K,
into the company's previously filed Form S-3 Registration Statement in
connection with the Nicor Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase
Plan (No. 33-56871), and Form S-8 Registration Statements in connection with
the Nicor Employee Stock Purchase Plan (No. 33-1732), the Nicor Gas Savings
Investment Plan (No. 33-56867), the Nicor Gas Thrift Plan (No. 33-60689), the
Birdsall Retirement Savings Plan (No. 333-28579), the Nicor 1989 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (No. 33-31029) and the Nicor 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(No. 333-28699).




ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 7, 2001
#### § 1260.111 Fiscal year.

*Fiscal year* means the calendar year or such other annual period as the Board may determine.
**Exhibit 32-4** **Certificate    Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of    Title 18 United States Code**     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the quarterly    report on    Form 10-Q    of Commonwealth Edison Company for the quarterly period ended    September 30, 2006, that (i) the report fully complies    with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information    contained in the report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of    Commonwealth Edison Company. /s/  Robert    K. McDonald    Robert K. McDonald    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial    Officer, Treasurer and Chief Risk Officer     Date: October 27, 2006
#### § 1280.632 Disposition of records.

Each FSA CED will place in sealed containers marked with the identification of the “Lamb Checkoff Program Referendum,” all of the form LS-86's along with the accompanying documentation and county summaries. Such records will be placed in a secure location under the custody of FSA CED for a period of not less than 12 months after the date of notification by the Administrator, FSA, that the final results have been announced by the Secretary. If the county FSA office receives no notice to the contrary from the Administrator, FSA, by the end of the 12 month period as described above, the CED or designee shall destroy the records.
181 So. 468

#### SUPERIOR OIL CO. et al. v. LECKELT et al.

No. 34643.

April 4, 1938.

Rehearing Denied May 2, 1938.

*991W. J. & H. W. Waguespack and Denegre, Leovy & Chaffe, all of New Orleans, for appellants.

Emile A. Carmouche, Jr., of Lake Charles, in pro. per. and for appellant William Leckelt.

Liskow & Lewis, of Lake Charles, and F. P. Jones, Jr., of Leesville, for appellees.

PONDER, Justice.

There was no order to consolidate this suit with the suit of Superior Oil Producing Company et al. v. Richard Leckelt et al., 189 La. 972, 181 So. 462. However, the suits were treated together in the argument and the same points of law raised. We find that in the briefs of plaintiffs’ counsel and defendants’ counsel that they were treated together raising, the same issues. We also find in the transcript where it is stipulated by counsel for both 'sides that the evidence taken in Superior Oil Producing Company et al. v. Richard Leckelt et al., was to be considered as the record in this case, reserving to both sides the right to offer additional evidence. After a careful review of the record in this case, we find that the same legal questions are involved in this case as those raised in Superior Oil Producing Company et al. v. Richard Leckelt et al. Having recited the facts involved in this suit in detail and having disposed of the legal questions presented herein in our opinion this day handed down in Superior Oil Producing Comnany et al. v. Richard Leckelt et al., it would be unnecessary to again recite these facts and to again discuss these same legal questions.

In this suit a similiar lease, power of attorney, and transfer of mineral rights, was executed by William Leckelt to E. A. Carmouche, Jr. However, in this case, prior to the execution of these instruments, William Leckelt had only disposed of one-half of his mineral rights. Therefore, the judgment of the lower court was correct in setting aside these instruments only in so far as they affected the rights of the plaintiffs.

For the reasons assigned and the reasons this day handed down in Superior Oil Producing Company et al. v. Richard Leckelt et al., the judgment of the lower court is affirmed at appellants’ cost.
November 1, 1979

M. P. Nos. 78-223 and 78-225.

#### Valley Gas Company *v.*Edward F. Burke *and*Julius C. Michaelson *et al. v.*Valley Gas Company.

The motion of Valley Gas Company

to modify or in the alternative for rehearing, as prayed, is *893denied.

Mr. Justice Doris did not participate.

*Demine E. Sherman,*for Valley Gas Company. *Dennis J. Roberts II,*Attorney General, *John R. McDermott,*Special Assistant Attorney General, for Julius C. Michaelson *et al.*and Edward F. Burke.
§ 1207.342 Assessments. ( a ) The funds to cover the Board's expenses shall be acquired by the levying of assessments upon handlers and importers as designated in regulations recommended by the Board and issued by the Secretary. Such assessments shall be levied at a rate fixed by the Secretary which shall not exceed one-half of one per centum of the immediate past ten calendar years United States average price received for potatoes by growers as reported by the Department of Agriculture and not more than one such assessment may be collected on any potatoes.
( b ) Each designated handler, as specified in regulations, shall pay assessments to the Board on all potatoes handled by him, including potatoes he produced. Assessments shall be paid to the Board at such time and in such manner as the Board shall direct pursuant to regulations issued hereunder. The designated handler may collect the assessments from the producer, or deduct such assessments from the proceeds paid to the producer on whose potatoes the assessments are made, provided he furnishes the producer with evidence of such payment.
( c ) The importer of imported potatoes, potato products, or seed potatoes shall pay the assessment to the Board at the time of entry, or withdrawal, for consumption of such potatoes and potato products into the United States.
( d ) The assessment on imported tablestock potatoes and frozen or processed potato products for ultimate consumption by humans and on seed potatoes shall be established by the Board so that the effective assessment shall be equal to that on domestic production.
( e ) The Board may authorize other organizations to collect assessments in its behalf.
( f ) The Board may exempt potatoes used for nonfood purposes, other than seed, from the provisions of this plan and shall establish adequate safeguards against improper use of such exemptions.
[37 FR 5008, Mar. 9, 1972, as amended at 49 FR 20806, May 17, 1984; 56 FR 40230, Aug. 14, 1991]
(February 14, 1967)

(Republished)

#### Margaret Near, Respondent, v. Aron Vaisberg, Individually and as a Copartner of Vaisberg Bros., Defendant, and Leon Vaisberg, Individually and as a Copartner Doing Business under the Name of Vaisberg Bros., et al., Appellants.

Orders .entered on July 20, 1966, and order entered on April 28, 1966, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The order of this court entered on February 9, 1967 [27 A D 2d 804] is vacated. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, McNally and Witmer, JJ.
#### § 1124.6 Supply plant.

See § 1000.6.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: 2019 NAEP High School Transcript Study (HSTS) Results      

# Report: 2019 NAEP High School Transcript Study (HSTS) Results

This report describes the course-taking patterns and academic performance of graduates from a national sample of U.S. public and private schools who also took the 2019 National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) twelfth-grade mathematics and science assessments.**Learn more.**