alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7020

ABDU-SALIM GOULD,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

TODD E. ISHEE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:20-hc-02074-D)

Submitted: December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdu-Salim Gould, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7020 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Abdu-Salim Gould seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gould has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Gould’s motions for a certificate of 

appealability and for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7020 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 2 of 2
#### § 1214.18 Promotion.

*Promotion* means any action, including paid advertising and public relations that presents a favorable image of Christmas trees to the general public with the intent of improving the perception and competitive position of Christmas trees and stimulating sales of Christmas trees.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Data on Arts Education in Schools      

# Data on Arts Education in Schools

This report from the Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics presents findings from a congressionally mandated study on arts education in public elementary and secondary schools. 

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2012014
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of IXI Mobile, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 (the “Report”), as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Amit Haller, President
      and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
              /s/ Amit Haller
              Amit Haller
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer
              (Principal Executive Officer)
            Dated: August 20,
              2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”),and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§1350), Kent Snyder, Chief Executive Officer of Senomyx, Inc. (the “Company”),and John Poyhonen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

1.       TheCompany’s annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theExchange Act, and

2.       Theinformation contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set theirhands hereto as of the 23rd day of February, 2007.
|                                            |       |                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| /S/ KENT SNYDER                                 |       |                                          | /S/ JOHN POYHONEN |   |
|                                            |       |                                          |
| **KENT SNYDER**                                 | ** ** | **JOHN POYHONEN**                             |
| President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |       | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial and |
|                                            |       | Business Officer                              |
|                                            |       |                                          |
|                                                 |            |                                               |  |  |

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to whichit relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission andis not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Senomyx, Inc. underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

----
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Richard Falcone, Chief Executive Officer of Securus Technologies, Inc., certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 
|   | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
|   | /s/RICHARD FALCONE          |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Richard Falcone             |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer*** |
|   | August 11, 2006             |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmine Lanni, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered December 11, 1978, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of arson in the second degree, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the interest of justice, and a new trial ordered. Defendant contests the validity of the trial court’s charge on reasonable doubt. The People must prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt and a charge, as here, that the standard of proof is "to a reasonable degree of certainty,” *i.e.,*a mental "state of suspension so that you are unable to say that you are convinced that there is a strong probability of the defendant’s guilt” permits a lesser standard and constituted error. Further, the trial court’s charge relating to the status of one Vega as an accomplice was patently ambiguous. The court stated: "I charge you as a matter of law that Adrian Vega is an accomplice of the defendant if you believe his testimony.” While the motivation of the trial court in so charging emanated from a desire to protect the defendant’s rights, the absence of clarifying and particularized instructions rendered the charge defective. The conjunction of these two errors in the charge, although not excepted to by defendant, impels this court in the interest of justice to direct a new trial. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lane, Lupiano and Lynch, JJ.; Kupferman, J., concurs in result only.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Top 10 Tips for Engaging with Young People      

# Resource: Top 10 Tips for Engaging with Young People

This guide(PDF, 4 pages) advises service providers and others how to engage successfully with youth, using specific examples to illustrate effective (and ineffective) communication. 

https://nwi.pdx.edu/pdf/proj-5-AMP-top-ten-tips-for-engaging-young-people.pdf
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00159-CR

JOSE ABELARDO ALBERTO APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1344244D

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Jose Abelardo Alberto pled guilty pursuant to a plea bargain to 

possessing at least one gram but less than four grams of a controlled 

substance—methamphetamine—and the trial court followed the bargain, placing

Appellant on four years’ deferred adjudication community supervision and 

imposing a $400 fine that was not suspended, restitution, court costs, and other 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

conditions. Appellant also signed a judicial confession, waived all pretrial 

motions, and waived all rights of appeal.

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea-bargained case and 

that Appellant has no right of appeal. We therefore informed Appellant by letter 

that his case was subject to dismissal unless he or any party desiring to continue 

the appeal showed grounds for continuing it.

2 We have received no response. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.3

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 7, 2014

 2

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 25.2(d).

3

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).
#### John Ehardt and Mathias Ehardt, plaintiffs in error, v. Max Sugarman, defendant in error.

Gen. No. 34,499.

Opinion filed March 24, 1931.

Smietanka, Poulton & Bryant, for plaintiffs in error; Morton John Barnard, of counsel.

Cummings & Wyman, for defendant in error; Harold Engstrom, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 170]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ170.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 3]]

Public Law 109-170
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset of certain provisions 
           of such Act. <<NOTE: Feb. 3, 2006 -  [H.R. 4659]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT.

    Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing 
Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA 
PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-56; 115 Stat. 295) <<NOTE: 119 
Stat. 2957.>> is amended by striking ``February 3, 2006'' and inserting 
``March 10, 2006''.

    Approved February 3, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4659:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Feb. 1, considered and passed House.
            Feb. 2, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Webinar: Evidence Innovation: How AmeriCorps Investments are Addressing the Opioid Crisis      

# Webinar: Evidence Innovation: How AmeriCorps Investments are Addressing the Opioid Crisis

**Date:**February 29, 2024, 3:00 - 4:30pm ET

During this webinar, experts will discuss AmeriCorps' approach for growing evidence-building innovations, present findings, and share best practices for responding to localized community health capacity needs.**Learn more and register.**
#### § 1206.107 Confidential information.

The ballots and other information or reports that reveal, or tend to reveal, the vote of any person covered under the Order and the voter list shall be strictly confidential and shall not be disclosed.
**Exhibit 32-7****Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code**     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofPECO Energy Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, that (i) the reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PECO Energy Company.        Date: October 26, 2005 /s/ J. Barry Mitchell   J. Barry Mitchell   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert M. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 3rd day of September, 2008.                                                                                                               
|   

| | ROBERT M. BAKER                                    
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert M. Baker                                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer













---
---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---



---
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 11, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1326

Lower Tribunal No. 18-251-C-P

________________

Carlos Perez Sanchez,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Luis Garcia, Judge.

Carlos Perez Sanchez, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### § 1205.210 Additional instructions and forms.

AMS is hereby authorized to prescribe additional instructions and forms not inconsistent with the provisions of this subpart for the use of State and County FSA offices in conducting a referendum. Such additional instructions may include procedures for FSA county and State offices to report and announce the results of the preliminary count of the votes in the county and the State.
From: Carlson, Sara <Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com>

Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 2:40 PM

To: Lloyd, David; Dressler, Jason; Fortin, Kelly; Land, Eva

Cc: Maness, Katie; Rahul Pendse (rpendse@trinityconsultants.com); JSerne@trcsolutions.com; Grygar, Bill Subject: RE: Emissions Testing of the Main Engines on the Noble Bob Douglas

- Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
Attachments: Anadarko

- Test Plan

- BlackHawk.pdf

Good afternoon. Attached is the Emissions Test Protocol for the Diamond BlackHawk drillship. A paper copy wi ll be shipped out to the EPA Region 4 office address today. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me. Thanks,
Sara Carlson Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Sr EHS Representative, Gulf of Mexico Sara.Carlson@anadarko.com

832

- 636

- 1273 (office)

832

- 506

- 0888 (cell)

Click here for Anadarko’s Electronic Mail Disclaimer
#### § 1033.75 Plant location adjustments for producer milk and nonpool milk.

For purposes of making payments for producer milk and nonpool milk, a plant location adjustment shall be determined by subtracting the Class I price specified in § 1033.51 from the Class I price at the plant's location. The difference, plus or minus as the case may be, shall be used to adjust the payments required pursuant to §§ 1033.73 and 1000.76.