alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1







**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Calibre Energy, Inc. (“Calibre”) on
      Form10-KSB, as amended, for the quarter and year ending December 31, 2005 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 30, 2006
      and amended on August 24, 2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1350 as adopted pursuant to §§ 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge based upon a review of the Report,
      that:




(1)
         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Calibre
      as of the dates and for periods presented as required by such
      Report.






/s/
                Prentis B. Tomlinson, Jr.Prentis
                B. Tomlinson, Jr.President,
                CEO and Chief Executive OfficerAugust
                24, 2006







This
      certification is provided pursuant to §§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      be deemed filed by Calibre or the certifying officer for purposes of §§ 18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by §§ 906 has been provided to
      Calibre and will be retained by it and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
      request.







60
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Report of ZIM Corporation, a Canadian corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A-3 for the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael Cowpland, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael Cowpland
--------------------
Michael Cowpland
Chief Executive Officer

April 21, 2006
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-262-CV

IN RE JEROME D. BROWN	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL  A:  CAYCE, C.J.; WALKER and MCCOY, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  July 28, 2008
FORM
  6-K

SECURITIES
  AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,
  D. C. 20549

---

REPORT
  OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

Pursuant
  to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 under 
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For
  the month of May 2004

Commission
  File Number: 000-12713

---

NEC
  CORPORATION

(Translation
  of registrant's name into English)

---

7-1,
  Shiba 5-chome 
  Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

(Address
  of principal executive offices)

---




Indicate
  by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
  cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F  [ X ]      Form 40-F [     ]

Indicate
  by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form,
  the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission
  pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes  [     ]      No
  [ X ]



---

SIGNATURE



NEC
          CORPORATION(Registrant)By:
      
      /S/
              FUJIO OKADAFujio Okada
        General Manager, Legal Divison




---












---



May
10, 2004



NEC
to Sell Part of its Holdings in NEC Mobiling, Ltd.



NEC Corporation ("NEC") announced today that it decided to sell part of
its holdings in NEC Mobiling, Ltd. ("NEC Mobiling"), a subsidiary listed on
the Tokyo Stock Exchange, as described below.

The sale of NEC Mobiling's shares by NEC will cause no changes
to the relationship between the two companies generally.
NEC Mobiling will remain a NEC's consolidated subsidiary on NEC's
consolidated financial statements.





1.
 Changes in Number and Percentage of Shares Held



|Name of Shares     | Number                | Percentage           
|------------------ | --------------------- | ---------------------
|Before Sale        | Shares to be Sold     | After Sale           
|                   | (Thousands of Shares) | (Thousands of Shares)
|NEC Mobiling, Ltd. | 9,750                 | 2,100                



2.
 Purchaser



NEC
	Mobiling's shares will be sold to securities companies.



3.
 Date of Sale



Scheduled
for the middle of May, 2004



4.
 Effect on NEC's Financial Results for the Fiscal Year ending
March 31, 2005



NEC's
	expected capital gain from the sale of the shares of NEC Mobiling has
	been reflected in NEC's financial results for the fiscal year ending
        March 31, 2005, which was announced on April 28, 2004.





---

Contact:Makoto MiyakawaGroup ManagerCorporate
Communication DivisionNEC Corporation
TEL:+81-3-3798-6511
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
160°

164° 168°

172°

176°

180° 176° 172°

160° 156°

BULLETIN 1028 PLATE 21

152° 148°

58"

st Matthew ©
Island ~__-}

58°
70
100
G
Cs
¥
\
XN
“PRIBILOF ~ its
= PRIB
<= ISLANDS
Stiopad areas incite Tatar to Recent Veale rocks
\
| Ee
| = eo
pot | SI | yee _ 50
<< | | \ Geology of Aleutian Islands in-Bart after PS. Smith, 1939
168° 172° 176° 180° 176° 172° 168° 164° 160° 156°
MAP OF BERING SEA REGION SHOWING DISTRIBUTION OF TERTIARY AND RECENT VOLCANIC ROCKS

377634 © - 56 (In Pocket)
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Jennifer North, Chief Financial Officer of ZIM Corporation, certify that:

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-KSB/A of ZIM Corporation; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Date: November 17 , 2005

/s/ Jennifer North

----------------------- 

Jennifer North

Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Maria Magdalena PATINO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-11288

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 5, 2007.

Bret E. Helmer, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*352Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Maria Magdalena Patino pleaded guilty to one count of making a false statement to a government agent (in conjunction -with attempting, for payment, to smuggle minors into this Country), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The district court departed upwardly from the 6 to 12 month advisory guildeline sentencing range to 24 months of imprisonment, stating reasons for doing so consistent with 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Patino appeals her sentence, claiming the extent of the departure was unreasonable.

Given the great deference owed to the district court in this matter, the reasons it provided, the circumstances of the offense, Patino’s previous unpunished criminal activity, and the extent of upward departures given in other cases, the district court did not abuse its discretion in the extent of the departure, and the sentence is reasonable. *See United States v. Smith,*440 F.3d 704, 708 n. 5 (5th Cir.2006); *United States v. Saldana,*427 F.3d 298, 302-04, 312, 315-16 (5th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
OPEN FILE REPORT 79-777
PLATE 2 OF 13

MONTANA-BIG HORN CO.
5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)

7.

SPRING CREEK RANCH QUADRANGLE

UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

q AEs a £8
af 4 mae g ; El
i, 2 Ud reali fio ig
z 5% aia * ; 24
zt es nee 5° = & By?
HE ei ae ae a ib i i
gh PL il aul | - ia) gu
a ao Uk. Bad - OE AY
EEE a ile4, 3 ot atte ‘ a u rl ea
at se ‘| = he 48) FBG
tl ne eee
2 zee EEE: e é G2
z° 3 g 5° s 3 E 3 i a
‘ sw S 8 ow
Be iat yroe is < $8
$ ‘ ® \ BE
» (3 i : 5 : : ube
+ a ; sf
g 8 2
z +} # © . - ° . - o = i = 2 PE
aa S
Bal - [8 «BE
AuvaNnog VANaSaY NVIGNI 3NN3A3HO — mI ef ry = a = = = & ~ = -, = & & = SSS : SSS @ @
MN : A SS ~
E|

SSS
SX

\\)

SS ‘ \\ \\ SS SS
SESS

SSN SSS
SERS SSS sx“
x SSSA
BE = .
SS . WS

MN

‘
<
ww

oe
.
SS

Xs

=
SS
SS
SS
SC
=

SSS

107°07'30"

45°22'30"

i) NS

a SESS
2 SERS
2

=

ce)

é

~

SN
WN
ENS

. ~ S“ \\ \

\

SC RRERE?LJM_

S

SS

\

NOMOOT NIVLNNOW 370M)
MS 17499

=
=
=
S
Be
~S = *
S = SSN SS SS
5 WAS SOS S :
> . Se s . = . SES .: SS =
. oe Ss: . eS . SSS = .. ~
LO : SSS: ‘ : =f S S
> Ae . S S ASS * S . SS . SS SS
S ~ s ~ * = = S S SESS . SS Sa STS
= : ~ SS YS :
. SEARS . RS = e SSS ~ SSN
S S 8S S : S : SS SSN SS =
> = . ss AN = SSNS SS = NE S SSS SS
S = Se = . LES > : * $ = < SN SND ETS S Sean
* < SN : ri = 2h SES : = SRE Se
= “ Ss S = = S : os SS 3 Sec
= SN > = oe SSS SSS IS aN
oe = > % RN 3 ES » . : Se
SN SESS ESSA SSE .
* SON SSE 2 SS 3 SERS : =

: .

SS

=
\\
\

A ANA

\* SS Sa eS es So
: S = :

= SS Sie SS
STERN WSs Ss SSS
NES = = = S SESS
: . SSNS
Se =

SSS
: SSA
SES

SS Ss

45°15'

- 4574 NE
SCALE 1:24.00
TM o
3000

NTER OF SHEET

UTM GRID AND 1967 MAGNETIC NORTH
AT CENT!

DECLINATION

) Base map from U.S. Geological Survey, 1967

107°07'30"
Ye
we

COAL RESOURCE OCCURRENCE MAP OF THE SPRING CREEK RANCH

PLATE 2

BOUNDARY AND COAL DATA MAP

QUADRANGLE BIG HORN COUNTY, MONTANA
BY COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES RESEARCH INSTITUTE

1979
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

###### Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 1421

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart E of part 1421 appear at 74 FR 15656, Apr. 7, 2009.

#### § 1421.400 Applicability.

(a) This subpart specifies the terms and conditions under which an entity that is a DMA of peanut producers, or a subsidiary of such an entity, may qualify as a DMA, as defined in § 1421.3. DMAs may process peanut MALs and LDPs on behalf of producers.

(b) This subpart only applies with respect to peanut MALs and peanut LDPs.

[80 FR 128, Jan. 2, 2015]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Q&A: Amy Lin of Young Invincibles on Helping Young People Find Health Insurance      

# Q&A: Amy Lin of Young Invincibles on Helping Young People Find Health Insurance

This interview features Amy Lin of the health advocacy group Young Invincibles discussing her organization’s work to encourage young people to sign up for health insurance through the Health Insurance Marketplace. Amy also discusses the challenges that young people, including those who are homeless or teen parents, face in accessing healthcare and how youth-serving professionals can help them overcome these obstacles.

http://ncfy.acf.hhs.gov/news/2014/03/qa-amy-lin-young-invincibles-helping-young-people-find-health-insurance
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000885040
<NAME>                        VERMONT PURE. INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,408,158
<SECURITIES>                                   4,276,064
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,457,943
<ALLOWANCES>                                   732,133
<INVENTORY>                                    2,778,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,131,878
<PP&E>                                         23,135,717
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,083,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11,825,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,155,310
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       20,218
<OTHER-SE>                                     42,308,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   42,328,738
<SALES>                                        35,124,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               35,124,813
<CGS>                                          14,682,361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,682,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21,390,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,893,087
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,151,842)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   769,164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,382,678)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,382,678)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.22)



</TABLE>
#### § 1219.12 Hass avocado.

*Hass avocado* means the fruit grown in or imported into the United States of the species *Persea americana* Mill., or other type of avocados that, in the determination of the Board, with approval of the Secretary, is so similar to the Hass variety avocado as to be indistinguishable to consumers in fresh form. The term shall include all fruit in fresh, frozen, or any other processed form.
§ 1216.70 Certification. ( a ) Organizations receiving certification from the Secretary will be entitled to submit nominations for Board membership to the Secretary for appointment and to submit requests for funding to the Board.
( b ) For major peanut-producing states, state-legislated peanut promotion, research, and information organizations may request certification, provided the state-legislated promotion program submits a factual report that shall contain information deemed relevant and specified by the Secretary for the making of such determination pursuant to paragraph (e) of this section.
( c ) If a state-legislated peanut promotion, research and information organization in a major peanut-producing state does not elect to seek certification from the Secretary within a specified time period as determined by the Secretary, or does not meet eligibility requirements as specified by the Secretary, then any peanut producer organization whose primary purpose is to represent peanut producers within a primary peanut-producing state, or any other organization which has peanut producers as part of its membership, may request certification. Certification shall be based, in addition to other available information, upon a factual report submitted by the organization that shall contain information deemed relevant and specified by the Secretary for the making of such determination pursuant to paragraph (e) of this section.
( d ) For minor peanut-producing states, any organization that has peanut producers as part of its membership may request certification.
( e ) The information required for certification by the Secretary may include, but is not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) The geographic distribution within the state covered by the organization's active membership;
( 2 ) The nature and size of the organization's active membership in the state, proportion of the organization's active membership accounted for by producers, a map showing the peanut-producing counties in the state in which the organization has members, the volume of peanuts produced in each county, the number of peanut producers in each county, and the size of the organization's active peanut producer membership in each county;
( 3 ) The extent to which the peanut producer membership of such organization is represented in setting the organization's policies;
( 4 ) Evidence of stability and permanency of the organization;
( 5 ) Sources from which the organization's operating funds are derived;
( 6 ) Functions of the organization;
( 7 ) The organization's ability and willingness to further the aims and objectives of the Act and Order; and,
( 8 ) Demonstrated experience administering generic state promotion and research programs.
( f ) The Secretary's determination as to eligibility or certification of an organization shall be final.
#### In the Matter of Ralph Paukovits et al., Appellants, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Blooming Grove et al., Respondents, and Sarah Stegenga et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

— In a proceeding *684pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Blooming Grove, dated October 2, 1977, and made after a hearing, which found that the use of certain property by the intervening respondents as an automobile repair facility constituted a lawful nonconforming use, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated March 2, 1978, which dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, determination annulled, and certificate of nonconforming use vacated. The instant proceeding concerns an automobile repair facility situated on the Stegenga family farm in the Town of Blooming Grove. The property is zoned for residential and agricultural uses, and has been so zoned since 1953. However, in an undated determination, the town building inspector ruled that the repair facility constituted a valid, nonconforming use. Petitioners, who are town residents, sought review of the determination before the respondent zoning board of appeals (the zoning board). The testimony introduced at the hearing revealed that the repair facility was operated by the brothers John and William Stegenga. William Stegenga testified that he had been repairing automobiles there since 1955, at which time he was 15 years old. At first, the work was performed "as a hobby”; regular rates have been charged customers only over the last few years. Other local residents testified that John Stegenga, Sr., father of the present owners and now deceased, had from time to time performed automobile repair work at the same location, beginning in the late 1940’s. Mr. Stegenga was a farmer by trade. The automobile work was done as a favor to friends and to help strangers whose cars had broken down. There was no evidence that Mr. Stegenga had ever charged for his services, although one of the witnesses stated that he had paid Stegenga, over the latter’s protest. William Stegenga characterized his father’s repair work as "a hobby” done to "break up the monotony of the farm.” After the hearing, the zoning board held that the repair facility was a lawful nonconforming use which had been "operated continuously since in or about the year 1946”. The determination was confirmed by Special Term. The judgment should be reversed and the determination annulled. A nonconforming use in existence at the time of the enactment of a zoning ordinance will be permitted to continue in cases where enforcement of the ordinance would cause substantial pecuniary or economic loss. A "hobby” cannot constitute a lawful, nonconforming use *(People v Miller,*304 NY 105). In the instant proceeding, the uncontroverted evidence established that prior to the enactment of the ordinance, John Stegenga, Sr., had repaired automobiles as a hobby, and not for any pecuniary benefit. Therefore, a nonconforming use was not established. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and Shapiro, JJ., concur.