alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

!"a$

!"c$

!"c$

!"a$ White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

± Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

?¿

?Â

Aã

?3⁄4

Iz

I}

Iv

Iv

Iz

Map 3-6

Agua Fria National

Monument / BradshawHarquahala Planning Area

Groundwater Basins

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Land Status

BLM

BOR

City, County & State Parks

County Lands

Indian Lands

Military

NPS

Private

State

State Wildlife Area

USFS

USFWS

SubBasin Boundary
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Cuba and of the Emergency Authority Relating to the Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels

On March 1, 1996, by Proclamation 6867, a national emergency was declared to address the disturbance or threatened disturbance of international relations caused by the February 24, 1996, destruction by the Cuban government of two unarmed United States-registered, civilian aircraft in international airspace north of Cuba. On February 26, 2004, by Proclamation 7757, the national emergency was expanded to deny monetary and material support to the Cuban government. On February 24, 2016, by Proclamation 9398, and on February 22, 2018, by Proclamation 9699, the national emergency was further modified based on continued disturbances or threatened disturbances of the international relations of the United States related to Cuba. The Cuban government has not demonstrated that it will refrain from the use of excessive force against United States vessels or aircraft that may engage in memorial activities or peaceful protest north of Cuba.

Further, the unauthorized entry of any United States-registered vessel into Cuban territorial waters continues to be detrimental to the foreign policy of the United States because such entry could facilitate a mass migration from Cuba. It continues to be United States policy that a mass migration from Cuba would endanger United States national security by posing a disturbance or threatened disturbance of the international relations of the United States.

Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect to Cuba and the emergency authority relating to the regulation of the anchorage and movement of vessels set out in Proclamation 6867, as amended by Proclamation 7757, Proclamation 9398, and Proclamation 9699.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2021-04174

Billing code 3295-F1-P
#### § 1214.12 Order.

*Order* means an order issued by the Secretary under section 514 of the Act that provides for a program of generic promotion, research, and information regarding agricultural commodities authorized under the Act.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           National Highway Traffic Safety Administration      

# National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration was established by the Highway Safety Act of 1970 to carry out safety programs previously administered by the National Highway Safety Bureau. Learn more about driving and vehicle safety, research in the area, and laws and regulations.

http://www.nhtsa.gov/About
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Israel Technology Acquisition Corp.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Israel
      Frieder, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Sec.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2. The
            information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects,
            the financial condition and result of operations of the
            Company.


/s/ Israel
                  Frieder
                
                
                Dated:
                  August 25, 2005Israel
                      Frieder
                    Chairman
                      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
                    (Principal
                      Executive Officer)
May	27,	2015

The	Honorable	John	Kerry Secretary	of	State U.S.	Department	of	State 2201	C	Street,	NW Washington,	DC	20520
RE:	DOS

- 2015

- 0016 The	Honorable	Anthony	Foxx Secretary	of	Transportation U.S.	Department	of	Transportation 1200	New	Jersey	Avenue, SE Washington,	DC	20590
RE:	DOT

- OST

- 2015

- 0082

The	Honorable	Penny	S.	Pritzker Secretary	of	Commerce U.S.	Department	of	Commerce 1401	Constitution	Avenue,	NW Washington,	DC	20230
RE:	DOC

- 2015

- 0001

Dear	Secretaries	Kerry,	Foxx	and	Pritzker:

I	am	an	elected	director	for	the	Sacramento	Municipal	Utility	District	Board, the	country’s	6 th largest	public	utility.	B ut
, I am	writing	as	a	private	citizen	to	relate	my	concerns	regarding recent	challenges	to	Open	Skies,	the	policy	that	promotes
interna tional	air	travel. I	am	also	a	Director	of	Technology	at	Public	Consulting	Group	where	I	travel	extensively	to	serve my	clients.

As	a	Vietnamese	American,	I	travel	frequently	to Southeast Asia. Both	for	business	and	for	pleasure,	I	have	spent	a significan t	amount	of	time	in	the	region. The	routes	opened	by	Etihad	and	Emirates	Airways	from	San	Francisco International	have	benefited	me	greatly. These	carriers offer	impeccable	service at reasonable prices.	They	have	also
made	destinations	in	Southeast	Asia mo re	accessible

. For	many	years,	there	were	limited	routes	to	Asia,	often	at	very high	premiums	for	direct	or	short	layover	flights. This	factor	is	especially	important for	myself	and	for my	mother who travels	back	to	Vietnam	several	times	a	year .	Shaving	m any	hours	off	the total	travel	time	eases	the	trip	and	lets	us	make the	most	of	the	limited	time	we	have	available	to	visit	with	family	and	explore	our	intended	destination.

I	expect	t hat many other	Californians	share	my opinion.	This	state	is	home	to	many vibrant	Asian	communities,	members of	which	work	hard	to	maintain	ties	to	extended	family,	to	send	the	next	generation overseas to	experience	and
understand	the ir culture,	and to develop	cross

- border	business	relationships.	These	activities	are	good	for	A merica’s
di versity, cultural	heritage,	economy,	and	international	standing.

The	U.S.	should	promote	competitive	air	travel,	not	roll	back	a	policy	that	has	helped	connect	San	Francisco	and	the	rest
of	the	U.S.	to	the	world. The	more	carrier	options	we	have as	travelers	will	increase	the	quality	of	flight	experiences	with increased	competition,	decrease	the	price	of	flying	and	will	employ	thousands	of	people	around	the	world,	and particularly	in	the	U.S. Please	take	action	to	protect	Open	Skies.

Sincerely,

Nancy	Bui

- Thompson Vice	President,	Sacramento	Municipal	Utility	District	Board	of	Directors
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 13

- 00129

- CV

LONE STAR STEEL AKA BRAD STANDLEE

DBA LONE STAR STEEL

, Appellant

v.

SANDERS PLUMBING, IN C.

, Appellee

From the 249th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 200900254

ORDER

We have been notified of the death of appellee’s counsel. Although there is no

formal procedure to delay this proceeding for this circumstance, in the inter est of

justice, we abate this proceeding to allow appellee time to locate new counsel.

The appeal and all appellate deadlines are abated as of the date of this Order.

The appeal will be automatically reinstated on December 9, 2013. Any deadline that

beg an to run and has not expired by the date of this Order will begin anew as of theLone Star Steel v. Sanders Plumbing, Inc. Page 2

date the appeal is reinstated. Any document filed by a party after the date of this Order

and prior to the reinstatement of the appeal will be deemed filed on the same day, but

after, the appeal is reinstated.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed October 10, 2013
#### Olivia Martinez et al., Appellants, v New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 513]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated March 21, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in allowing the defendant to make a late motion for summary judgment. The Supreme Court has “wide latitude” in deciding whether to allow late motions for summary judgment *(Williams v Nicolaou,*284 AD2d 451 [2001]). Here, the defendant filed its motion well in advance of trial, and the plaintiffs demonstrated no prejudice resulting from the consideration of the motion *(see Coumbes v Taylor,*298 AD2d 351, 352 [2002]).

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The defendant demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing, inter alia, that there was no evidence that the condition complained of was present for a sufficient period of time for the defendant to have discovered and remedied it in the exercise of reasonable care *(see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836 [1986]). Absent such evidence, constructive notice may not be imputed to the defendant *(see Yearwood v Cushman & Wakefield,*294 AD2d 568, 569 [2002]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.
#### DETWEILER, Appellant, v. DOWLING et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

Action by Thomas N. Detweiler against John F. Dowling and others. F. H. Field, for appellant. P. M. Hersog, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
#### Domenic Tripoli, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Onondaga Landfill Systems, Inc., Respondent, v Joseph R. Tripoli et al., *1032Appellants.

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We do not find that Special Term abused its discretion in granting the equitable relief of enjoining defendants from interfering with plaintiffs contract rights with Onondaga Landfill Systems, Inc., pending trial of the lawsuits between plaintiff and defendants. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court — declaratory judgment.) Present — Simons, J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeal **s**

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 27, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00246

- CR

Destyn David FREDERICK

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- 09

- 00041

- CRL

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On July 21, 2015, appellant filed a pro se motion to suspend electronic filing and a pro se

reply brief, asserting appointed counsel had abandoned the appeal. Appellate counsel, however,

timely filed an appellant’s brief in this appeal on April 20, 2015, and the filing of a reply brief is

not mandatory under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In Texas, appellants do not have a

right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State , 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981).

Therefore, appellant’s pro se motion and reply brief are STRICKEN and will not be considered

by the court.

It is so ORDERED on the 27 th day of July , 201 5

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Dear Colleague Letter: Court-Imposed Fees and Fines for Youth      

# Resource: Dear Colleague Letter: Court-Imposed Fees and Fines for Youth

The DOJ issued a Dear Colleague letter to state and local courts and juvenile justice agencies addressing the constitutional and legal issues and policy considerations related to juvenile and adult fines and fees. The letter states that children and youth under the jurisdiction of the juvenile justice system should be presumed indigent and unable to pay fines and fees. The letter provides additional recommendations and best practices regarding fines and fees. **Learn more.**
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors


Noble Energy, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-186497) on Form S-3 and the registration statements (No. 333‐108162, 333‐118976, 333‐118977, 333‐124964, 333‐143203, 333‐143204, 333‐158922, 333‐177825, and 333-191878) on Form S‐8 of Noble Energy, Inc. of our reports dated February 19, 2015, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Noble Energy, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‐year period ended December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, which reports appear in the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 10‐K of Noble Energy, Inc.





/s/ KPMG LLPHouston, TexasFebruary 19, 2015
**Exhibit23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.333-134578, 333-127771, 333-116893 and Form S-3 Nos. 333-129444, 333-128865) ofSenomyx, Inc. of our reports dated February 20, 2007 with respect to thefinancial statements of Senomyx, Inc., management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Senomyx, Inc.,included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2006.
|  | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|--|---------------------------|--------|

 

San Diego, California

February 20, 2007

----
§ 1206.43 Exemptions. ( a ) Any first handler or importer of less than 500,000 pounds of mangos per calendar year may claim an exemption from the assessments required under § 1206.42. Mangos produced domestically and exported from the United States may annually claim an exemption from the assessments required under § 1206.42.
( b ) A first handler or importer desiring an exemption shall apply to the Board, on a form provided by the Board, for a certificate of exemption. A first handler must certify that it will receive less than 500,000 pounds of domestic mangos during the fiscal period for which the exemption is claimed. An importer must certify that it will import less than 500,000 pounds of mangos for the fiscal period for which the exemption is claimed.
( c ) Upon receipt of an application, the Board shall determine whether an exemption may be granted. The Board then will issue, if deemed appropriate, a certificate of exemption to each person who is eligible to receive one. It is the responsibility of these persons to retain a copy of the certificate of exemption.
( d ) Importers who receive a certificate of exemption shall be eligible for reimbursement of assessments collected by Customs. These importers shall apply to the Board for reimbursement of any assessments paid. No interest will be paid on the assessments collected by Customs. Requests for reimbursement shall be submitted to the Board within 90 days of the last day of the calendar year the mangos were actually imported.
( e ) Any person who desires an exemption from assessments for a subsequent calendar year shall reapply to the Board, on a form provided by the Board, for a certificate of exemption.
( f ) The Board may require persons receiving an exemption from assessments to provide to the Board reports on the disposition of exempt mangos and, in the case of importers, proof of payment of assessments.
[68 FR 58554, Oct. 9, 2003, as amended at 84 FR 5345, Feb. 21, 2019; 86 FR 11097, Feb. 24, 2021; 86 FR 33494, June 25, 2021]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lamont Miller, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 889]

*816Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered April 11, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Flaherty, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the showup identification procedure was not unduly suggestive *(see People v Ponce de Leon,*291 AD2d 415 [2002]; *People v Serrano,*219 AD2d 508, 509 [1995]; *People v Yearwood,*197 AD2d 554 [1993]).

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request to call the complaining witness to testify at the pretrial hearing, since no substantial issues as to the constitutionality of the identification were raised, the People’s evidence was not notably incomplete, and the defendant did not otherwise establish a need for the witness’s testimony *(see People v Scott,*290 AD2d 522 [2002]; *People v Padilla,*219 AD2d 688 [1995]).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses (see *People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see *People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Santucci, J.P., Florio, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.