alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: American Community Survey Resources for American Indian and Alaska Native Populations      

# Resource: American Community Survey Resources for American Indian and Alaska Native Populations

This webpage contains resources for American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) populations about understanding and accessing the American Community Survey (ACS). Resources include training materials, information about responding to the survey, and ways to find data.**Learn more.**
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHybrid propulsion technology program. Volume 1: Conceptional design packageA concept design study was performed to configure two sizes of hybrid boosters; one which duplicates the advanced shuttle rocket motor vacuum thrust time curve and a smaller, quarter thrust level booster. Two sizes of hybrid boosters were configured for either pump-fed or pressure-fed oxygen feed systems. Performance analyses show improved payload capability relative to a solid propellant booster. Size optimization and fuel safety considerations resulted in a 4.57 m (180 inch) diameter large booster with an inert hydrocarbon fuel. The preferred diameter for the quarter thrust level booster is 2.53 m (96 inches). As part of the design study critical technology issues were identified and a technology acquisition and demonstration plan was formulated.Document ID19900012477Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsJensen, Gordon E.*(United Technologies Corp. San Jose, CA, United States)*Holzman, Allen L.*(United Technologies Corp. San Jose, CA, United States)*Leisch, Steven O.*(United Technologies Corp. San Jose, CA, United States)*Keilbach, Joseph*(United Technologies Corp. San Jose, CA, United States)*Parsley, Randy*(United Technologies Corp. San Jose, CA, United States)*Humphrey, John*(United Technologies Corp. San Jose, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 15, 1989Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:183953NASA-CR-183953PROJ-2027-FR-VOL-1Accession Number90N21793Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-37778Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900012477.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

May 24, 2013

t0521

Order 

May 24, 2013

145497

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145497

COA: 309493

Macomb CC: 2009-002637-FC

DWAYNE E. WILSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### In the Matter of Leonard Baron, Appellant, v. Robert Mackreth et al., as Trustees of the Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 18 (Plainedge), Town of Oyster Bay, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding under CPLR article 78 to compel respondents to reinstate petitioner as a teacher of driver education in respondents’ school district, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 21, 1966, dismissing his petition on the ground of laches. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and proceeding remanded to Special Term for a hearing in accordance herewith. No questions of fact have been considered. In our opinion, the record at bar does not contain a sufficient showing *662to sustain respondents’ defense of *laches.*A hearing is required as to all the oireumstanees bearing on the questions whether petitioner’s delay in demanding reinstatement was reasonable and excusable and as to whether that delay prejudiced the rights of respondents or other persons *(Matter of Ayman*v. *Teachers’ Retirement Bd.,*19 Misc 2d 355, 372, affd. 10 A D 2d 835, mod. on other grounds 9 N Y 2d 119; *Harman*v. *Board of Educ.,*196 Misc. 287, 296, affd. 275 App. Div. 694, affd. 300 N. Y. 21; 22 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, pp. 388-390; see, also, *Weiss*v. *Mayflower Doughnut Corp.,*1 N Y 2d 310, 318; *Reynolds*v. *Snow,*10 A D 2d 101, 111, affd. 8 N Y 2d 899). To avoid circuity of proceedings, the hearing should also explore the questions (a) whether the driver education course was in fact dropped from the curriculum in respondents’ school district, as an accredited course; (b) if it was, whether it has been restored as part of the curriculum; and (e) if it was dropped and has not been restored, whether that action was taken by respondents in good faith. ' Such inquiry is necessary because petitioner may be entitled to reinstatement if the defense of laches is not established, and either (a) the driver education course was not in fact abolished from the curriculum; or (b) it was abolished, but has been restored; or (c) it was abolished and has not been restored, but the purpose of its abolition was to circumvent petitioner’s tenure rights (see Education Law, § 2585, subds. 2, 5; *Matter of Boyd*v. *Collins,*11 N Y 2d 228, 233-234). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Warner Music Group Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Warner Music Group Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: February 14, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 26, 2019

t1118 

# Order

Clerk November 26, 2019

158876

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158876

COA: 343427

Grand Traverse CC: 2017

- 012754

- FH

ASHLEY LYNN HENDERSHOTT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of April 2, 2 019, the application for leave to appeal the October 31, 2018

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v

Dixon

- Bey (Docket No. 156746). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been

denied in Dixon

- Bey on July 29, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented

should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of 360 Global Wine Company (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, A.
      John
      A. Bryan, Jr. , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





May
      18,
      2007


*/s/
                  A. John A. Bryan, Jr.*A.
                    John A. Bryan, Jr.Chief
                    Executive Officer and
                  Principal
                      Financial and Accounting
                      Officer
## SERVED: 

## JUNE 29, 2012

., U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC 1 IN THE MATTER OF 

### MESA AIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKET No. CP05SW0002 (Civil PenaltyAction) DMS No. FAA-2009-0279



### ---------------------------------------------- ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

## -2



# ..
OnApril9, 2009, the Federal AviationAdministration ("Complainant") filed a Complaint. OnApril2, 2009, Mesa Airlines ("Respondent") had requested a hearing. Bymotion dated June 28, .4012, Respondent filed a Withdrawal ofRequestfor.Hearing and moved to dismiss this proceeding, citing settlement ofthe matter in the context ofthe reorganization inbankruptcy ofRespondent and its parentcompany, Mesa Air Group, Inc. 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney maywithdraw a complaint orparty may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative law

### judge~ Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing having been read and considered, it is ORDERED that: · 

### 2: ILi2 1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing is hereby GRANTED; and 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Attachments - Service List [;/L_J c /**~w.** Richard C. Goodwin Administrative LawJudge

._ ,,• ;



### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1


### ChristopherPappaioanou Director, Legal Affairs Mesa Air Group 410 North 44th Street, Suite 700 Phoenix, AZ 85008 TEL: 602-685-4000 FAX: 602-685-4350 

### ONE COPY

Annjenet Chennault, Attorney, Safety Enforcement Branch Office ofthe Regional Counsel Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC Federal Aviation Administration FortWorth, TX 76193-0007 TEL: 817-222-5071 FAX: 817-222-5092/5946 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 ,, U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FAADocket No. CP09SW0002 (Civil Penalty Action)

.,

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
§ 1220.211 Powers of the Board. The Board shall have the following powers: ( a ) To receive and evaluate, or on its own initiative develop, and budget for plans or projects for promotion, research, consumer information, and industry information and to make recommendations to the Secretary regarding such proposals;
( b ) To administer the provisions of this subpart in accordance with its terms and provisions;
( c ) To make rules to effectuate the terms and provisions of this subpart;
( d ) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints of violations of the provisions of this subpart;
( e ) To disseminate information to producers or producer organizations through programs or by direct contact utilizing the public postage system or other systems;
( f ) To assign responsibilities relating to budget and program development to the Committee as provided in § 1220.219.
( g ) To select committees and subcommittees of Board members, and to adopt such rules for the conduct of its business as it may deem advisable;
( h ) To contract with Qualified State Soybean Boards to implement plans or projects;
( i ) To recommend to the Secretary amendments to this subpart; and
( j ) With the approval of the Secretary, to invest, pending disbursement pursuant to a plan or project, funds collected through assessments authorized under § 1220.223 in, and only in, obligations of the United States or any agency thereof, in general obligations of any State or any political subdivision thereof, in any interest-bearing account or certificate of deposit of a bank which is a member of the Federal Reserve System, or in obligations fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Williams, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 787]

*292Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert I. Altman, J.), rendered February 5, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of SVz years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. In addition to defendant’s recent, exclusive and unexplained possession of the proceeds of a burglary *(see People v Galbo,*218 NY 283, 290 [1916]), there was testimony that defendant matched the description of a man who left the burglarized building and headed toward the nearby location where, only a few minutes later, the police stopped defendant. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Williams and Friedman, JJ.
EXHIBIT 4.23

                 Demand Promissory Note dated September 24, 2004

                          Signed by Magellan Gold Corp.




<PAGE>



                             DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


USD $110,000.00                                               SEPTEMBER 24, 2004



FOR VALUE  RECEIVED,  the  undersigned  promises to pay to the order of MAGELLAN
GOLD CORP.  on the Maturity Date (as  hereinafter  defined) and at its principal
office located in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, or at such other place as
the holder of this Note may from time to time  designate,  the  principal sum of
ONE HUNDRED TEN  THOUSAND  DOLLARS  ($110,000.00)  in lawful money of the United
States of America, without interest.

Principal  due  under  this  Note  shall be due and  payable  on the  date  (the
"MATURITY DATE") that is the earlier of (a) the one year anniversary of the date
of this Note and (b) the date upon which the undersigned or either of Marsa Gold
or Aitas  Mining  Company  commits  a  material  breach of that  certain  Letter
Agreement entered into between the Lender, the undersigned, Marsa Gold and Aitas
Mining  Company  dated  September  23,  2004,  pertaining  to a  share  exchange
transaction.

If principal is not paid when due, the  undersigned  promises to pay interest on
all sums due at the rate of 18% per annum from the  Maturity  Date  until  paid,
together with all costs of collection, including without limitation, legal fees,
and all  expenses  in  connection  with the  protection  or  realization  of the
collateral securing this Note, if any, or the enforcement of any guaranty hereof
incurred by the holder(s) hereof on account of such  collection,  whether or not
suit is filed hereon or thereon; such costs and expenses shall include,  without
limitation,  all costs, expenses and legal fees incurred by the holder(s) hereof
in connection  with any  insolvency,  bankruptcy,  arrangement  or other similar
proceedings  involving the  undersigned,  or involving any endorser or guarantor
hereof,  which in any way affects the  exercise by the  holder(s)  hereof of the
rights and remedies of such holder(s)  under this  promissory  note or under any
security agreement or other agreement securing or guarantying this Note.

The  undersigned,  when not in default  hereunder,  will have the  privilege  of
prepaying in whole or in part the principal sum without notice or bonus.

Presentment,  protest,  notice of  protest  and notice of  dishonour  are hereby
waived.

BULAKASHU MINING COMPANY.



By:  /s/ Oleg Kim
     -----------------------
     Oleg Kim, its President


<PAGE>
                                      -6-
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Prevalence of Diagnosed and Undiagnosed HIV Infection — United States, 2008–2012

This study analyzed HIV surveillance data for people 13 years or older in the United States reported to CDC through June 2014 to estimate the prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed HIV infection for 2008–2012. 

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6424a2.htm?s_cid=mm6424a2_e&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
#### § 1260.115 Qualified State beef council.

*Qualified State beef council* means a beef promotion entity that is authorized by State statute or a beef promotion entity organized and operating within a State that receives voluntary assessments or contributions; conducts beef promotion, research, and consumer and industry information programs; and that is certified by the Board pursuant to this subpart as the beef promotion entity in such State.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1410.44 Average adjusted gross income. ( a ) Benefits under this part will not be available to persons or entities whose average adjusted gross income exceeds $900,000 for the 3 taxable years preceding the most immediately preceding complete taxable year, or who otherwise do not meet the AGI requirements specified in part 1400 of this chapter.
( b ) The limit specified in paragraph (a) of this section may be waived in accordance with part 1400, subpart F, of this chapter.