Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 223 / Wednesday, November 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 68795 

■ 18. Appendix A to subpart UUUUU is 

amended by adding sections 7.1.2.5, 

7.1.8.5, and 7.1.8.6, to read as follows: 

Appendix A to Subpart UUUUU of Part 

63—Hg Monitoring Provisions 

* * * * * 

7. Recordkeeping and Reporting 

* * * * * 

7.1.2 Operating Parameter Records. 

* * * 

* * * * * 

7.1.2.5 If applicable, a flag to indicate 

that the hour is a startup or shutdown 

hour (as defined in § 63.10042). 

* * * * * 

7.1.8 Hg Emission Rate Records. 

* * * 

* * * * * 

7.1.8.5 If applicable, a code to 

indicate that the default electrical load 

(as defined in § 63.10042) was used to 

calculate the Hg emission rate. 

7.1.8.6 If applicable, a code to 

indicate that the diluent cap (as defined 

in § 63.10042) was used to calculate the 

Hg emission rate. 

* * * * * 

■ 19. Appendix B to subpart UUUUU is 

amended by revising section 9.3.1 and 

adding sections 10.1.2.5, 10.1.7.5, and 

10.1.7.6 to read as follows: 

Appendix B to Subpart UUUUU of Part 

63—-HCl and HF Monitoring Provisions 

* * * * * 

9. Data Reduction and Calculations 

* * * * * 

9.3.1 For heat input-based emission 

rates, select an appropriate emission 

rate equation from among Equations 19– 

1 through 19–9 in EPA Method 19 in 

Appendix A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, 

to calculate the HCl or HF emission rate 

in lb/MMBtu. Multiply the HCl 

concentration value (ppm) by 9.43 × 

10¥8 to convert it to lb/scf, for use in 

the applicable Method 19 equation. For 

HF, the conversion constant from ppm 

to lb/scf is 5.18 × 10¥8. The appropriate 

diluent cap value from section 6.2.1.2 of 

Appendix A to this subpart may be used 

to calculate the HCl or HF emission rate 

(lb/MMBtu) during startup or shutdown 

hours. 

* * * * * 

10. Recordkeeping Requirements 

* * * * * 

10.1.2 Operating Parameter Records. 

* * * 

* * * * * 

10.1.2.5 If applicable, a flag to 

indicate that the hour is a startup or 

shutdown hour (as defined in 

§ 63.10042). 

* * * * * 

10.1.7 HCl and HF Emission Rate 

Records. * * * 

* * * * * 

10.1.7.5 If applicable, a code to 

indicate that the default electrical load 

(as defined in § 63.10042) was used to 

calculate the HCl or HF emission rate. 

10.1.7.6 If applicable, a code to 

indicate that the diluent cap (as defined 

in § 63.10042) was used to calculate the 

HCl or HF emission rate. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–27125 Filed 11–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 63 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0234; FRL–9919–21– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AS39 

National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and 

Oil-Fired Electric Steam Generating 

Units 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to amend the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: 

Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Steam 

Generating Units (Mercury and Air 

Toxics Standards (MATS)). This direct 

final rule amends the reporting 

requirements in the MATS rule by 

temporarily requiring affected sources to 

submit all required emissions and 

compliance reports to the EPA through 

the Emissions Collection and 

Monitoring Plan System (ECMPS) Client 

Tool and temporarily suspending the 

requirement for affected sources to 

submit certain reports using the 

Electronic Reporting Tool and the 

Compliance and Emissions Data 

Reporting Interface (CEDRI). 

DATES: This rule is effective on January 

5, 2015 without further notice, unless 

the EPA receives adverse comment by 

December 19, 2014. If the EPA receives 

adverse comment, we will publish a 

timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register informing the public that some 

or all of the amendments in the final 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Comments. Submit your 

comments, identified by Docket ID 

Number EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0234, by 

one of the following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 

Attention Docket ID Number EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2009–0234. 

• Fax: (202) 566–9744. Attention 

Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2009–0234. 

• Mail: U.S. Postal Service, send 

comments to: U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center, 

Mail Code: 28221T, Attention Docket ID 

Number EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0234, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center, 

Room 3334, EPA WJC West Building, 

1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20004. Attention 

Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2009–0234. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Docket’s normal 

hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions. Direct your comments to 

Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2009–0234. The EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal information provided, 

unless the comment includes 

information claimed to be confidential 

business information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected through http://

www.regulations.gov or email. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means the EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to the EPA without 

going through http://

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, the EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, the EPA may not 

be able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should not include 

special characters or any form of 

encryption and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
68796 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 223 / Wednesday, November 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

about the EPA’s public docket, visit the 

EPA Docket Center homepage at: 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

We request that you also send a 

separate copy of each comment to the 

contact person listed below (see FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Barrett Parker, Sector Policies and 

Programs Division (D243–05), Office of 

Air Quality Planning and Standards, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; 

telephone number: (919) 541–5635; fax 

number: (919) 541–3207; and email 

address: parker.barrett@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Organization of This Document. The 

information in this preamble is 

organized as follows: 

I. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule? 

II. Does this direct final rule apply to me? 

III. What should I consider as I prepare my 

comments for the EPA? 

IV. What are the amendments made by this 

direct final rule? 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions 

To Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low-Income 

Populations 

K. Congressional Review Act 

I. Why is the EPA using a direct final 

rule? 

The EPA is publishing this direct final 

rule without a prior proposed rule 

because we view this as a 

noncontroversial action and anticipate 

no adverse comment. However, in the 

‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this 

Federal Register, we are publishing a 

separate document that will serve as the 

proposed rule to the National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: 

Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Steam 

Generating Units, if adverse comments 

are received on this direct final rule. If 

the EPA receives adverse comment on 

all or a distinct portion of this direct 

final rule, we will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register 

informing the public that some or all of 

this direct final rule will not take effect. 

Any rule provisions that are not 

withdrawn will become effective on 

January 5, 2015 notwithstanding 

adverse comment on any other 

provision, unless we determine that it 

would not be appropriate to promulgate 

those provisions because they are 

affected by another provision (or 

provisions) for which we receive 

adverse comments. If we receive adverse 

comments on this direct final rule, 

resulting in withdrawal of the entire 

rule or any part(s) of it, we will address 

those comments when we finalize the 

proposal we are also publishing in this 

Federal Register. The EPA does not 

plan to institute a second comment 

period on this action. Any parties 

interested in commenting must do so at 

this time. For further information about 

commenting on this rule, see the 

ADDRESSES section of this document. 

II. Does this direct final rule apply to 

me? 

Categories and entities potentially 

regulated by this final rule include: 

Category NAICS Code 1 Examples of regulated entities 

Industry ..................................................... 221112 Fossil fuel-fired electric steam generating units. 

Federal government 2 ................................ 221122 Fossil fuel-fired electric steam generating units owned by the federal government. 

State/local/tribal government 2 .................. 221122 Fossil fuel-fired electric steam generating units owned by states, tribes or municipalities. 

921150 Fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam generating units in Indian country. 

1 North American Industry Classification System. 

2Federal, state or local government-owned and operated establishments are classified according to the activity in which they are engaged. 

This table is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

regulated by this direct final rule. To 

determine whether your facility would 

be regulated by this direct final rule, 

you should examine the applicability 

criteria in 40 CFR 63.9981. If you have 

any questions regarding the 

applicability of this action to a 

particular entity, consult either the air 

permitting authority for the entity or 

your EPA regional representative as 

listed in 40 CFR 63.13. 

III. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for the EPA? 

Submitting CBI. Do not submit 

information containing CBI to the EPA 

through http://www.regulations.gov or 

email. Clearly mark the part or all of the 

information that you claim to be CBI. 

For CBI information on a disk or CD– 

ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the 

outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI 

and then identify electronically within 

the disk or CD–ROM the specific 

information that is claimed as CBI. In 

addition to one complete version of the 

comments that includes information 

claimed as CBI, you must submit a copy 

of the comments that does not contain 

the information claimed as CBI for 

inclusion in the public docket. If you 

submit a CD–ROM or disk that does not 

contain CBI, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM clearly that it does not 

contain CBI. Information not marked as 

CBI will be included in the public 

docket and the EPA’s electronic public 

docket without prior notice. Information 

marked as CBI will not be disclosed 

except in accordance with procedures 

set forth in 40 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) part 2. Send or 

deliver information identified as CBI 

only to the following address: Roberto 

Morales, OAQPS Document Control 

Officer (C404–02), OAQPS, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 

27711, and Attention Docket ID Number 

EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0234. 

IV. What are the amendments made by 

this direct final rule? 

This direct final rule amends the 

reporting requirements in 40 CFR 

63.10031(f) of the MATS regulation. 

Currently the rule requires affected 

sources to submit certain MATS 

emissions and compliance information 

electronically, using either the CEDRI or 

the ECMPS Client Tool. The EPA has 

developed these two systems for the 

electronic submittal of emissions data. 

Historically, CEDRI has been used by 

sources regulated under 40 CFR parts 60 

and 63 to submit performance test 

reports and other air emissions reports. 

Historically, ECMPS has been used to 

report emissions data under the EPA’s 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 223 / Wednesday, November 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 68797 

Acid Rain Program and other programs 

that are required to continuously 

monitor and report emissions according 

to 40 CFR part 75. These two systems 

have enhanced the way sources are 

reporting emissions data to the EPA by 

providing a streamlined and 

standardized electronic approach. 

Subsequent to publication of MATS, 

stakeholders commented that the EPA 

could improve the reporting efficiency 

of the rule by requiring all data to be 

reported to one system instead of two. 

Stakeholders also commented that one 

system could benefit the EPA and the 

public in the review of data submitted 

by setting one consistent format for all 

data reported through MATS. Further, 

because the vast majority of sources 

covered under the MATS rule have been 

using the ECMPS Client Tool since 

2009, the stakeholders have encouraged 

the EPA to seriously consider 

consolidating the electronic reporting 

under ECMPS. 

The EPA agrees with the stakeholders 

that taking an action to increase the 

efficiency of reporting is not only a 

plausible path forward, but also a 

priority of the agency. As a result, the 

EPA plans to start the process of 

converting all electronic reporting in the 

rule to be facilitated by the ECMPS 

Client Tool with the first step of 

conversion being this direct final 

rulemaking. However, because the EPA 

cannot create a detailed set of reporting 

instructions and design, develop, betatest and implement the necessary 

modifications to the ECMPS Client Tool 

prior to April 16, 2015, the compliance 

deadline for the MATS rule, the EPA is 

implementing a phased approach to 

completing the modifications to the 

ECMPS Client Tool. 

The first part of the phased approach 

the EPA plans to take is this direct final 

rulemaking. This direct final rule 

requires sources to temporarily use the 

ECMPS Client Tool to submit Portable 

Document Format (PDF) versions of the 

reports that the current MATS rule 

requires to be submitted using CEDRI. 

The specific reports that must be 

submitted in PDF format include: 

Quarterly and annual performance stack 

test reports; 30 operating day Hg LEE 

test reports; Relative Accuracy Test 

Audits (RATA) reports for Sulfur 

Dioxide (SO2), Hydrogen Chloride (HCl), 

Hydrogen Fluoride (HF), and Mercury 

(Hg) monitors; Relative Calibration 

Audit (RCA) and Relative Response 

Audit (RRA) reports for Particulate 

Matter (PM) Continuous Emissions 

Monitoring System (CEMS); 30 

operating day rolling average reports for 

PM CEMS, PM Continuous Parameter 

Monitoring System (CPMS), and 

approved HAP metals CEMS; and 

Semiannual compliance reports. Reports 

for the performance stack tests, Hg Low 

Emitting EGU (LEE) tests, RATAs, 

RRAs, and RCAs typically include a 

description of the source, the test 

date(s), a list of attendees, a test 

protocol, a summary of results, raw field 

data, and example calculations, and, 

depending on the method(s) used, may 

also include the results of sample 

analyses, quality-assurance information 

(e.g., bias and drift checks), instrument 

calibrations, and calibration gas 

certificates. Additionally, the due dates 

for all report submittals will continue to 

be the same as in the original final 

MATS rulemaking in the Federal 

Register at 77 FR 9303, February 16, 

2012. 

The EPA realizes that submitting 

electronic PDF reports is not as 

desirable as reporting the data in 

extensible markup language (XML) 

format, because the information in a 

PDF report cannot easily be extracted 

and put in a database format. In view of 

this, the EPA intends to promulgate an 

additional data reporting revision to the 

MATS rule in the second phase of this 

approach. In the second phase the EPA 

plans to develop another direct final 

rulemaking that requires affected 

sources to submit the data elements 

required in the rule in a structured XML 

format using the ECMPS Client Tool, 

already in use. The second phase will 

complete the process of conversion of 

the electronic reporting of data using the 

ECMPS Client Tool and the MATS rule 

will be revised to specify all of the 

required XML data elements for each 

type of report. The EPA will also 

develop a detailed set of reporting 

instructions for each report and modify 

ECMPS accordingly, in order to be able 

to receive and process the data 

submitted. 

In the event the EPA is unable to 

finalize the rulemaking for the second 

phase of the electronic reporting 

conversion by April 16, 2017, in 

accordance with the revisions to the 

reporting requirements contained in this 

rulemaking, the reporting requirements 

will automatically revert to the original 

requirements set forth in the original 

MATS rulemaking in the Federal 

Register at 77 FR 9303, February 16, 

2012. This is to ensure that the data 

submitted in the future is consistent 

with the database accessibility that is 

associated with information reported in 

structured XML formats even if the 

second rulemaking cannot be finalized. 

Accordingly, this rulemaking includes a 

date of April 16, 2017, to complete the 

second phase of the electronic reporting 

conversion to the ECMPS Client Tool. 

Comments on this direct final rule are 

to be limited to issues directly 

associated with the electronic reporting 

changes covered in 40 CFR 63.10031. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory 

Planning and Review and Executive 

Order 13563: Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under the terms of 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and is therefore not 

subject to review under Executive 

Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011). 

B. Paperwork Reduction Act 

This action does not impose any new 

information collection burden because it 

does not change the information 

collection requirements. However, the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) has previously approved the 

information collection requirements 

contained in the existing regulation (40 

CFR part 63, subpart UUUUU) under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 

Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., and has 

assigned OMB control number 2137.06. 

The OMB control numbers for the EPA’s 

regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9. 

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act 

generally requires an agency to prepare 

a regulatory flexibility analysis of any 

rule subject to notice and comment 

rulemaking requirements under the 

Administrative Procedure Act or any 

other statute unless the agency certifies 

that the rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. Small entities 

include small businesses, small 

organizations and small governmental 

jurisdictions. 

For purposes of assessing the impact 

of this final action on small entities, 

small entity is defined as: (1) A small 

business that is an electric utility 

producing 4 billion kilowatt-hours or 

less as defined by NAICS codes 221122 

(fossil fuel-fired electric utility steam 

generating units) and 921150 (fossil 

fuel-fired electric utility steam 

generating units in Indian country); (2) 

a small governmental jurisdiction that is 

a government of a city, county, town, 

school district or special district with a 

population of less than 50,000; and (3) 

a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently 

owned and operated and is not 

dominant in its field. 

After considering the economic 

impacts of this final rule on small 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
68798 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 223 / Wednesday, November 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

entities, I certify that this action will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

In determining whether a rule has a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities, the 

impact of concern is any significant 

adverse economic impact on small 

entities, since the primary purpose of 

the regulatory flexibility analyses is to 

identify and address regulatory 

alternatives ‘‘which minimize any 

significant economic impact of the rule 

on small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 

Thus, an agency may certify that a rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities if the rule relieves regulatory 

burden, or otherwise has a positive 

economic effect on all of the small 

entities subject to the rule. 

This rule will not impose any 

requirements on small entities, and no 

small entities are expected to incur 

annualized costs as a result of the 

amendments. We have determined that 

the amendments will not result in any 

‘‘significant’’ adverse economic impact 

for small entities. This amendment does 

not create any new requirements or 

burdens, and no costs are associated 

with this amendment. 

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This rule does not contain a federal 

mandate that may result in expenditures 

of $100 million or more for state, local 

and tribal governments, in the aggregate, 

or the private sector in any one year. 

The costs of the final amendments 

would not increase costs associated 

with the final rule. Thus, this rule is not 

subject to the requirements of sections 

202 or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act (UMRA). 

This rule is also not subject to the 

requirements of section 203 of UMRA 

because it contains no regulatory 

requirements that might significantly or 

uniquely affect small governments. The 

final amendments contain no 

requirements that apply to such 

governments and impose no obligations 

upon them. 

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism 

This action does not have federalism 

implications. It will not have substantial 

direct effects on the states, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the states or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132. This action does 

not modify existing responsibilities or 

create new responsibilities among the 

EPA Regional offices, states or local 

enforcement agencies. Thus, Executive 

Order 13132 does not apply to this 

action. 

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

This action does not have tribal 

implications, as specified in Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000). The final amendments impose no 

requirements on tribal governments. 

Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not 

apply to this action. 

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

The EPA interprets Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as 

applying to those regulatory actions that 

concern health or safety risks, such that 

the analysis required under section 5– 

501 of the Executive Order has the 

potential to influence the regulation. 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13045 because it is based solely 

on technology performance. 

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

This action is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 

2001), because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

I. National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104– 

113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs 

the EPA to use voluntary consensus 

standards (VCS) in its regulatory 

activities, unless to do so would be 

inconsistent with applicable law or 

otherwise impractical. VCS are 

technical standards (e.g., materials 

specifications, test methods, sampling 

procedures and business practices) that 

are developed or adopted by VCS 

bodies. The NTTAA directs the EPA to 

provide Congress, through OMB, 

explanations when the agency decides 

not to use available and applicable VCS. 

This action does not involve technical 

standards. Therefore, the EPA did not 

consider the use of any VCS. 

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal 

Actions To Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations 

Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 

February 16, 1994) establishes federal 

executive policy on environmental 

justice. Its main provision directs 

federal agencies, to the greatest extent 

practicable and permitted by law, to 

make environmental justice part of their 

mission by identifying and addressing, 

as appropriate, disproportionately high 

and adverse human health or 

environmental effects of their programs, 

policies and activities on minority 

populations and low-income 

populations in the United States. 

The EPA has determined that this 

direct final rule will not have 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects 

on minority or low-income populations 

because it does not affect the level of 

protection provided to human health or 

the environment. The final amendments 

are either clarifications or compliance 

alternatives which will neither increase 

or decrease environmental protection. 

K. Congressional Review Act 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by the 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing the final rule 

and other required information to the 

United States Senate, the United States 

House of Representatives and the 

Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This direct 

final rule will be effective on January 5, 

2015. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Intergovernmental 

relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: November 7, 2014. 

Gina McCarthy, 

Administrator. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, title 40, chapter I, of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION 

STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR 

POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE 

CATEGORIES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 63 

continues to read as follows: 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 223 / Wednesday, November 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 68799 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart UUUUU—National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric 

Steam Generating Units 

■ 2. Section 63.10031 is amended by: 

■ a. Revising the first sentence in each 

of the following paragraphs: (f) 

introductory text, (f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(4); 

■ b. Revising paragraph (f)(5); and 

■ c. Adding paragraph (f)(6) to read as 

follows. 

§ 63.10031 What reports must I submit and 

when? 

* * * * * 

(f) On or after April 16, 2017, within 

60 days after the date of completing 

each performance test, you must submit 

the results of the performance tests 

required by this subpart to EPA’s 

WebFIRE database by using the 

Compliance and Emissions Data 

Reporting Interface (CEDRI) that is 

accessed through EPA’s Central Data 

Exchange (CDX) (www.epa.gov/cdx). 

* * * 

(1) On or after April 16, 2017, within 

60 days after the date of completing 

each CEMS (SO2, PM, HCl, HF, and Hg) 

performance evaluation test, as defined 

in § 63.2 and required by this subpart, 

you must submit the relative accuracy 

test audit (RATA) data (or, for PM 

CEMS, RCA and RRA data) required by 

this subpart to EPA’s WebFIRE database 

by using CEDRI that is accessed through 

EPA’s CDX (www.epa.gov/cdx). * * * 

(2) On or after April 16, 2017, for a 

PM CEMS, PM CPMS, or approved 

alternative monitoring using a HAP 

metals CEMS, within 60 days after the 

reporting periods ending on March 31st, 

June 30th, September 30th, and 

December 31st, you must submit 

quarterly reports to EPA’s WebFIRE 

database by using the CEDRI that is 

accessed through EPA’s CDX 

(www.epa.gov/cdx). * * * 

* * * * * 

(4) On or after April 16, 2017, submit 

the compliance reports required under 

paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section 

and the notification of compliance 

status required under § 63.10030(e) to 

EPA’s WebFIRE database by using the 

CEDRI that is accessed through EPA’s 

CDX (www.epa.gov/cdx). * * * 

(5) All reports required by this 

subpart not subject to the requirements 

in paragraphs (f) introductory text and 

(f)(1) through (4) of this section must be 

sent to the Administrator at the 

appropriate address listed in § 63.13. If 

acceptable to both the Administrator 

and the owner or operator of a source, 

these reports may be submitted on 

electronic media. The Administrator 

retains the right to require submittal of 

reports subject to paragraphs (f) 

introductory text and (f)(1) through (4) 

of this section in paper format. 

(6) Prior to April 16, 2017, all reports 

subject to electronic submittal in 

paragraphs (f) introductory text, (f)(1), 

(f)(2), and (f)(4) of this section shall be 

submitted to the EPA in electronic 

portable document format (PDF) using 

the ECMPS Client Tool. The following 

data elements must be entered into the 

ECMPS Client Tool at the time of 

submission of the PDF file: 

(i) The facility name, physical 

address, mailing address (if different 

from the physical address), and county; 

(ii) The ORIS code (or equivalent ID 

number assigned by EPA’s Clean Air 

Markets Division (CAMD)) and the 

Facility Registry System (FRS) ID; 

(iii) The EGU (or EGUs) to which the 

report applies. Report the EGU IDs as 

they appear in the CAMD Business 

System; 

(iv) If any of the EGUs in paragraph 

(f)(6)(iii) of this section share a common 

stack, indicate which EGUs share the 

stack. If emissions data are monitored 

and reported at the common stack 

according to part 75 of this chapter, 

report the ID number of the common 

stack as it is represented in the 

electronic monitoring plan required 

under § 75.53 of this chapter; 

(v) If any of the EGUs described in 

paragraph (f)(6)(iii) of this section are in 

an averaging plan under § 63.10009, 

indicate which EGUs are in the plan and 

whether it is a 30- or 90-day averaging 

plan; 

(vi) The identification of each 

emission point to which the report 

applies. An ‘‘emission point’’ is a point 

at which source effluent is released to 

the atmosphere, and is either a 

dedicated stack that serves one of the 

EGUs identified in paragraph (f)(6)(iii) 

of this section or a common stack that 

serves two or more of those EGUs. To 

identify an emission point, associate it 

with the EGU or stack ID in the CAMD 

Business system or the electronic 

monitoring plan (e.g., ‘‘Unit 2 stack,’’ 

‘‘common stack CS001,’’ or ‘‘multiple 

stack MS001’’); 

(vii) The rule citation (e.g., 

§ 63.10031(f)(1), § 63.10031(f)(2), etc.) 

for which the report is showing 

compliance; 

(viii) The pollutant(s) being addressed 

in the report; 

(ix) The reporting period being 

covered by the report (if applicable); 

(x) The relevant test method that was 

performed for a performance test (if 

applicable); 

(xi) The date the performance test was 

conducted (if applicable); and 

(xii) The responsible official’s name, 

title, and phone number. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–27126 Filed 11–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Office of the Secretary 

43 CFR Part 2 

[XXXD4523WT DWT000000.000000 

DS65101000] 

RIN 1090–AB07 

Privacy Act Regulations; Exemption 

for the Insider Threat Program 

AGENCY: Department of the Interior. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Interior is issuing a final rule to amend 

its regulations to exempt certain records 

in the Insider Threat Program from one 

or more provisions of the Privacy Act 

because of criminal, civil, and 

administrative law enforcement 

requirements. 

DATES: This final rule is effective 

December 19, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teri 

Barnett, Department of the Interior 

Privacy Act Officer, U.S. Department of 

the Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Mail 

Stop 5547 MIB, Washington, DC 20240. 

Email at Privacy@ios.doi.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department of the Interior (DOI) 

published a notice of proposed 

rulemaking in the Federal Register on 

September 2, 2014, 79 FR 51926, 

proposing to exempt certain records in 

the Insider Threat Program system of 

records in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 

552a(j)(2) and (k)(2) of the Privacy Act 

because of criminal, civil, and 

administrative law enforcement 

requirements. The Insider Threat 

Program system of records notice was 

published in the Federal Register on 

September 2, 2014, 79 FR 52033. 

Comments were invited on the Insider 

Threat Program system of records notice 

and the notice of proposed rulemaking. 

DOI received no comments on the 

notice of proposed rulemaking or 

published system of records notice and 

will therefore implement the 

rulemaking as proposed. 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES