alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   Page 20 of 20


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(H)

Key Bank USA, National Association         Bankers Trust Company
127 Public Square                            as Indenture Trustee
Cleveland, Ohio  44114-1306                4 Albany Street, 7th Floor
                                           New York, New York  10015

Bank One, National Association             MBIA Insurance Corporation
  as Eligible Lender Trustee                 as Surety Provider
One First National Plaza Suite 0126        113 King Street
Chicago, Illinois  60670                   Armonk, New York 10504


                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                      FOR KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-B

We have examined management's assertion, included in its representation letter
dated March 19, 2002 that Key Bank USA, National Association (KBUSA), a wholly
owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, complied with sections 4.04, 4.08(a), 4.08(b),
4.08(c), 5.05, 5.06, 5.07 and 5.08 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-B Sale
and Servicing Agreement and sections 1.(a)(xx), 1.(b)(iii), 2 and 3 of the
KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-B Administration Agreement (collectively, the
"Agreements") as of December 31, 2001 and the year then ended. Management is
responsible for KBUSA's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about KBUSA's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about KBUSA's
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances, except that in accordance with
Section 5.05 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, our examination assumed the
accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student loan processor. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on KBUSA's compliance with the specified
requirements.

In our opinion, assuming the accuracy of reports prepared by KBUSA's student
loan processor, management's assertion that KBUSA complied with the
aforementioned requirements as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended
is fairly stated, in all material respects.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of KBUSA, Bankers
Trust Company, Bank One, National Association and MBIA Insurance Corporation and
is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than for these
specified parties.



                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

March 19, 2002
927.300 General. ( a ) One of the primary missions of the Department of Energy is the use of its procurement process to ensure the conduct of research, development, and demonstration leading to the ultimate commercialization of efficient sources of energy. To accomplish its mission, DOE must work in cooperation with industry in the development of new energy sources and in achieving the ultimate goal of widespread commercial use of those energy sources. To this end, Congress has provided DOE with the authority to invoke an array of incentives to secure the commercialization of new technologies developed for DOE. One such important incentive is provided by the patent system.
( b ) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2182 and 42 U.S.C. 5908, DOE takes title to all inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the course of or under contracts with large, for-profit companies, foreign organizations, and others not beneficiaries of Pub. L. 96-517. Regulations dealing with Department's authority to waive its title to subject inventions, including the relevant statutory objectives, exist at 10 CFR part 784. Pursuant to that section, DOE may waive the Government's patent rights in appropriate situations at the time of contracting to encourage industrial participation, foster commercial utilization and competition, and make the benefits of DOE activities widely available to the public. In addition to considering the waiver of patent rights at the time of contracting, DOE will also consider the incentive of a waiver of patent rights upon the reporting of an identified invention when requested by such entities or by the employee-inventor with the permission of the contractor. These requests can be made whether or not a waiver request was made at the time of contracting. Waivers for identified inventions will be granted where it is determined that the patent waiver will be a meaningful incentive to achieving the development and ultimate commercial utilization of inventions. Where DOE grants a waiver of the Government's patent rights, either at the time of contracting or after an invention is made, certain minimum rights and obligations will be required by DOE to protect the public interest.
( c ) Another major DOE mission is to manage the nation's nuclear weapons and other classified programs, where research and development procurements are directed toward processes and equipment not available to the public. To accomplish DOE programs for bringing private industry into these and other special programs to the maximum extent permitted by national security and policy considerations, it is desirable that the technology developed in these programs be made available on a selected basis for use in the particular fields of interest and under controlled conditions by properly cleared industrial and scientific research institutions. To ensure such availability and control, the grant of waivers in these programs may necessarily be more limited, either by the imposition of field of use restrictions or national security measures, than in other DOE programs.
[60 FR 11815, Mar. 2, 1995, as amended at 63 FR 10505, Mar. 4, 1998]
EX-10.3(a)



 Exhibit 10.3(a) 

 

			
	June 1, 2012	  	

 AAA Capital Management Advisors, Ltd. 
 1300 Post Oak Blvd. #350 
 Houston, Texas 77056 

Attention: Mr. Anthony Annunziato 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr.
Annunziato: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 AAA Capital Energy Fund L.P. II 


  

	 	•	 	 AAA Master Fund LLC 


  

	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Global Futures Fund LTD. 


  

	 	•	 	 Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) LTD. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian Centner
		 	 Brian Centner
 Chief
Financial Officer & Director


  

			
	AAA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORS, LTD.
		
	By:	 	/s/ A. Anthony Annunziato


			
	Print Name:
 BC/sr
	 	 A. Anthony Annunziato
#### § 1209.200 Terms defined.

Unless otherwise defined in this subpart, the definitions of terms used in this subpart shall have the same meaning as the definitions in Subpart A—Mushroom Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Order of this part.
#### In the Matter of Vicki B., Respondent, v David H., Appellant.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 5 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated April 11, 1979, which, after a hearing, adjudged appellant to be the father of petitioner’s child. Permission for the taking of this appeal is hereby granted. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Family Court for a *de novo*hearing and determination. In this case the infant alleged to be the child of the appellant was born on December 14, *1971.*This paternity proceeding was commenced on July 13, *1978.*In order to avoid the bar of the two-year Statute of Limitations, petitioner was required to prove that the appellant either acknowledged paternity in writing or furnished support to the child (see Family Ct Act, § 517, subd [a]). The petitioner testified that appellant gave her $20 per week in cash from February, 1974 to October, 1975. Where a petitioner relies upon payments of support in order to avoid the two-year Statute of Limitations, the evidence must establish clearly and definitely, without doubt or equivocation, that payments of money by the putative father were provided for the purpose of sustenance of the child. To remove the bar of the statute, the support must be furnished under circumstances warranting a clear inference that the putative father recognizes the child as his own and indicates his willingness to assume his statutory duty of support *(Matter of Wong v Beckford,*28 AD2d 137, 138; *Matter of Shirley D v Ricardo B,*54 AD2d 564, 565). The only evidence in the case at bar concerning the purpose of the monetary payments was elicited by leading questions such as, "Did he give you anything for the baby?”, to which petitioner answered "Yes”. Appellant’s timely objection was improperly overruled. The record is silent on the crucial question of the circumstances surrounding these payments and their' purpose. A man’s gifts of money or items of personal property will not in and of themselves, be construed as an acknowledgment of paternity (see *Matter of Wong v Beckford, supra,*p 138). Accordingly, a new trial is required. Moreover, the opinion of the Family Court specifically notes that the results of a blood grouping test which did not exclude paternity were considered in reaching its determination. This was error (see Family Ct Act, § 532; *Matter of Cardinal v Green,*30 AD2d 711). Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, *JJ.,*concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annualreport of Senomyx, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-k for theperiod ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Poyhonen, VicePresident and Chief Financial and Business Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) andSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the“Exchange Act”); and

 

(2)  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of theperiod covered by the Report and results of operations of the Company for theperiod covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  March 8, 2005 | /S/ JOHN POYHONEN             |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                      | John Poyhonen                 |
|                      | Vice President and       |
|                      | Chief Financial and  Business |
|                      | Officer                       |

 

This certification shallnot be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act orotherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Suchcertification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

 

----
**[Fortress
      International Group, Inc. Letterhead]**




**AMENDMENT
      NO. 1 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**




August
      26, 2008


Washington
      Capital Advisors, Inc.


Attn:.
      Mr. C. Thomas McMillen




Dear
      Mr.
      McMillen:




Reference
      is hereby made to the Executive Consulting Agreement, dated as of January 19,
      2007 (the “Agreement”), entered into between Washington Capital Advisors, Inc.
      (the “Consultant”) and Fortress International Group, Inc. (formerly Fortress
      America Acquisition Corporation), (the “Company”).




The
      parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:




1.
            Section
                3(a) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




(a)  The
      Company hereby retains the Consultant and the Consultant hereby accepts
      engagement as a consultant and agrees to render services to the Company, on
      the
      terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement for the period (the
“ Consulting
      Period ”).
      Unless earlier terminated by either the Company or the Consultant as hereinafter
      provided, the Consulting Period shall end on January 19, 2012 (the “ Expiration
      Date ”);
      provided, however, that if this Agreement is renewed pursuant to Section 3(b)
      below, then the “Expiration Date” for the then current “Renewal Term” (as
      hereinafter defined) shall be the date that is the last day of the one year
      period of that Renewal Term.




2.
            Section
                4(a)(i) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




(a) Base
      Fee .
      As
      consideration for the provision of the Services, the Company agrees to pay
      or to
      cause its Subsidiaries to pay Consultant, during the term of this agreement
      the
      following fees:




(i)
            During
                the Consulting Period, the Company shall pay the Consultant a fee
                of One
                Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) per year (“Base Fee”) paid
                approximately equal installments bi-weekly.





The
      Amendment is effective as of August 26, 2008. Except as otherwise set forth
      herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.





Please
      confirm your agreement with this Amendment by signing in the space provided
      below.




Yours
                Sincerely,Fortress
                International Group, Inc.By:
                /s/ Thomas P.
                RosatoName: 
                Thomas P. RosatoTitle:   
                Chief Executive Officer








Accepted
      and Agreed





Washington
      Capital Advisors, Inc.


By: /s/
      C.
      Thomas McMillen


Name: 
      C. Thomas McMillen


Title:   
      Chief Executive Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Report: 2015–16 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:16): Student Financial Aid Estimates

This publication provides the first results of the NPSAS:16, the most comprehensive nationally representative survey of student financing of postsecondary education in the U.S. It describes the percentages of students receiving various types of financial aid and average amounts received, by type of institution attended, attendance pattern, dependency status, and income level. 

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018466&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Reports
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Bioenergy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Vince M. Guest, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)       
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)       
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




Registrant
            
            Universal
      Bioenergy, Inc.Date:
      January 18, 2011
            
            By:
            /s/ Vince M. GuestVince
      M. GuestPrinciple
      Financial Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           New Report on Prevalence of Teen Dating Violence      

# New Report on Prevalence of Teen Dating Violence

This press release from the American Psychological Association reports findings from a  study that used data from a national CDC survey and found that more than one in three teens had experienced dating violence. 

http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2013/07/dating-violence.aspx
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1275 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to carry out Executive Order 14091. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2023 

Mr. BANKS (for himself, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. HERN, Mr. 

ROSENDALE, Mr. LAMALFA, and Mr. GOSAR) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to carry out Executive 

Order 14091. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NO FEDERAL FUNDS FOR EXECUTIVE ORDER 

4 14091. 

5 No Federal funds may be used to carry out Executive 

6 Order 14091 (relating to further advancing racial equity 

7 and support for underserved communities through the 

8 Federal Government), issued on February 16, 2023. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Date: August 25, 2014 

To: Brenda Shine, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD 

From: Jeff Coburn 

Subject: Meeting Minutes for July 23, 2014, Meeting Between the U.S. EPA and 

Representatives of Phillips 66 

On July 23, 2014, representatives of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

and their contractor (RTI International) participated in a meeting with representatives of 

Phillips 66. The names and affiliations of the participants are included in Attachment 1. The 

purpose of the meeting was to discuss Phillip 66’s key concerns regarding startup and shutdown 

provisions for the fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU). 

The Phillips 66 representatives reviewed a series of refinery accidents, noting that many 

refinery accidents are caused due to explosions or fires in the FCCU electrostatic precipitator 

(ESP) as result of high carbon monoxide (CO) levels in the FCCU exhaust. During periods of 

startup, shutdown, malfunction, or hot standby, high levels of CO can occur, creating a 

combustible gas mixture in the FCCU exhaust. The ESP is a spark/ignition source, so if this 

combustible gas is directed to the ESP, fires and/or explosions can occur. Therefore, for safety 

purposes, if CO concentrations exceed a certain concentration (e.g., 5,000 parts per million), the 

ESP is automatically bypassed to prevent fire/explosion hazard. 

The Phillips 66 representatives indicated that a CO boiler cannot always be used to 

control CO due to the transient nature of the emissions during startup, shutdown, or malfunction, 

so even units equipped with CO boilers may need to bypass the ESP during startup or shutdown. 

When the ESP is bypassed, the opacity of the emissions exceeds 30 percent limit that was 

proposed for startup. The Phillips 66 representatives contended that opacity is not a perfect 

measure of particulate matter (PM) emissions. They argued that the emissions during this period 

are PM fine, so while there are a lot of very small particles, which cause high opacity, the mass 

of these very small particles are not very great. Thus, the Phillips 66 representatives stated that 

the 30 percent opacity limit is not achievable during startup. They also noted that, considering 

safety issues with the FCCU ESP, the alternative limit would also be needed during malfunctions 

or periods when the unit is on hot standby. 
Attachment 1 

Participants in July 23, 2014 EPA/API Meeting 

Phillips 66 Representatives 

Tim Goedeker 

Bill Henning 

Erin Tullos 

Michael Wardinsky 

U.S. EPA Representatives 

Andrew Bouchard 

Art Diem 

Eric Goehl 

Penny Lassiter 

Brenda Shine 

RTI International (EPA contractor) 

Jeff Coburn
#### Samuel Bright, appellant, v. Sam Lipavsky et al., appellees.

Gen. No. 33,605.

Opinion filed December 31, 1929.

Louis T. Herzon, for appellant; Rosenberg, Braude *&*Zimmerman and Blanksten, Freeman & Blanksten, for appellee; H. J. Rosenberg and Irving Berman, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.