alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(i)
    
    the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Azim H. PremjiAzim H. PremjiChief Executive Officer  (i)
    
    the Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Suresh C. SenapatySuresh C. SenapatyChief Financial Officer and Director
#### John E. Knechtel, defendant in error, v. Charles H. Shapiro et al., defendants, plaintiffs in error. Curtis J. Hooper, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 33,544.

Opinion filed January 27, 1930.

Curtis J. Hooper, *pro se.*Harold O. Mulks, for certain plaintiff in error. Bosenberg, Braude & Zimmerman, for defendant in error; Irving S. Berman, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1412.2 Administration. ( a ) ARC and PLC are administered under the general supervision of the Executive Vice-President, CCC, and will be carried out by FSA State and county committees (State and county committees).
( b ) State and county committees, and representatives and their employees, do not have authority to modify or waive any of the provisions of the regulations of this part.
( c ) The State committee may take any action required by the regulations of this part that the county committee has not taken. The State committee will also: ( 1 ) Correct, or require a county committee to correct, any action taken by such county committee that is not in accordance with the regulations of this part; or
( 2 ) Require a county committee to withhold taking any action that is not in accordance with this part.
( d ) No provision or delegation to a State or county committee will preclude the Executive Vice President, or the Deputy Administrator, or a designee, from determining any question arising under the program or from reversing or modifying any determination made by a State or county committee.
( e ) The Deputy Administrator has the authority to permit State and county committees to waive or modify any non-statutory deadline specified in this part.
( f ) Items of general applicability to program participants, including, but not limited to, application periods, application deadlines, internal operating guidelines issued to State and county offices, prices, yields, and payment factors established for ARC or PLC, are not subject to appeal in accordance with part 780 of this title.
[79 FR 46339, Aug. 8, 2014, as amended at 83 FR 40656, Aug. 16, 2018]
§ 1222.81 Referenda. ( a ) *Initial referendum.* The Order shall not become effective unless the Order is approved by a majority of manufacturers and importers voting in the referendum who also represent a majority of the volume of paper and paper-based packaging represented in the referendum and who, during a representative period determined by the Secretary, have been engaged in the manufacturing or importation of paper and paper-based packaging. A single entity who domestically manufactures and imports paper and paper-based packaging may cast one vote in the referendum.
( b ) *Subsequent referenda.* The Secretary shall conduct subsequent referenda: ( 1 ) For the purpose of ascertaining whether manufacturers and importers favor the amendment, continuation, suspension, or termination of the Order;
( 2 ) Not later than seven years after this Order becomes effective and every seven years thereafter, to determine whether manufacturers and importers favor the continuation of the Order. The Order shall continue if it is favored by a majority of manufacturers and importers voting in the referendum who also represent a majority of the volume of paper and paper-based packaging represented in the referendum and who, during a representative period determined by the Secretary, have been engaged in the manufacturing or importation of paper and paper-based packaging;
( 3 ) At the request of the Board established in this Order;
( 4 ) At the request of 10 percent or more of the number of persons eligible to vote in a referendum as set forth under the Order; or
( 5 ) At any time as determined by the Secretary.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1277 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make employers of spouses 

of military personnel eligible for the work opportunity credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2023 

Mr. BEYER (for himself, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. CARTER of Texas, 

Mr. PANETTA, Mr. CLINE, Mr. DUNN of Florida, Mr. BOST, Mr. JACKSON of Texas, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. BACON, Ms. MACE, Mr. ROSE, Mr. 

WITTMAN, Mr. GOSAR, Mrs. HINSON, Mr. LATURNER, Mr. JOHNSON of 

Ohio, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. OBERNOLTE, Mr. TURNER, Ms. 

WILD, Mr. PHILLIPS, Ms. TITUS, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. COHEN, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Ms. SCANLON, Mr. 

BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. EVANS, Mr. TRONE, Ms. SCHRIER, Ms. PINGREE, Mrs. PELTOLA, Ms. WEXTON, Ms. STRICKLAND, Ms. WILLIAMS of 

Georgia, Ms. DEAN of Pennsylvania, and Ms. HOULAHAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

employers of spouses of military personnel eligible for 

the work opportunity credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Spouse Hiring 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1277 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF SPOUSES OF MILITARY PERSONNEL 

2 FOR THE WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 51(d) of 

4 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph (I), by striking the period 

6 at the end of subparagraph (J) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and 

7 by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(K) a qualified military spouse.’’. 

9 (b) QUALIFIED MILITARY SPOUSE.—Subsection (d) 

10 of section 51 of such Code is amended by adding at the 

11 end the following new paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(16) QUALIFIED MILITARY SPOUSE.—The 

13 term ‘qualified military spouse’ means any individual 

14 who is certified by the designated local agency as 

15 being (as of the hiring date) a spouse of a member 

16 of the Armed Forces of the United States.’’. 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act to individuals who 

20 begin work for the employer after such date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*TYRONE ALLEN

(AC 22213)

Foti, West and McDonald, Js.

Argued October 28

officially released December 16, 2003

*Martin Zeldes,*senior assistant public defender, with whom were *Ruth D. Weissmann,*certified legal intern, and, on the brief, *Amy Dona,*certified legal intern, for the appellant (defendant).

*Frederick W. Fawcett,*supervisory assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were *Jonathan C. Benedict,*state’s attorney, and *C. Robert Satti, Jr.,*senior assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Tyrone Allen, was convicted, following a jury trial, of carrying a pistol without a permit in violation of General Statutes § 29-35 (a). The defendant also was convicted, after a simultaneous trial to the court, of criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217c. On *574appeal, the defendant claims that there was insufficient evidence to prove that the barrel of the firearm in question was less than twelve inches in length, a necessary element of the offenses.1

The state concedes, and we agree after examining the record, that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. See *State*v. *Gallichio,*71 Conn. App. 179, 182, 800 A.2d 1261 (2002). Accordingly, we reverse the conviction.

The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded with direction to render judgment of not guilty.

1

The defendant raised two additional claims that we do not address because the resolution of his first claim is dispositive of his appeal.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Richard Falcone, Chief Executive Officer of Securus Technologies, Inc., certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of myknowledge:     (1) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.                                       /s/ RICHARD FALCONE   Richard Falcone       November 16, 2005 *Chief Executive Officer*
#### In re ADAMS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate ¡vision, Fourth Department.

March 21, 1906.)

the matter of the application of James N. lams for the removal of William D. Doherty om the office of police commissioner of the ;y of Buffalo.

No opinion. Order entered rerring this matter to Hon. William A. Suthernd, counselor at law, residing in the city of ochester, to take the proofs herein and reirt to this court, with his opinion thereon.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Edward C. Williams,certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of Diamond Discoveries International Corp.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report;

 

4.  I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and have:

 

a)  designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls to be designed under mysupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annualreport my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)  disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a)  all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and

 

b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: April 14, 2004 | /s/ Edward C. Williams                                     |   |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Edward C. Williams                                         |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer  and  Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
§ 1260.211 Proceedings after termination. ( a ) Upon the termination of this subpart the Board shall recommend not more than 11 of its members to the Secretary to serve as trustees for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the Board. Such persons, upon designation by the Secretary, shall become trustees of all the funds and property owned, in the possession of or under the control of the Board, including unpaid claims or property not delivered or any other claim existing at the time of such termination.
( b ) The said trustees shall: ( 1 ) Continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary;
( 2 ) Carry out the obligations of the Board under any contract or agreements entered into by it pursuant to §§ 1260.150 and 1260.168.
( 3 ) From time to time account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of the Board and of the trustees, to such persons as the Secretary may direct; and
( 4 ) Upon the request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such persons full title and right to all of the funds, property, and claims vested in the Board or the trustees pursuant to this subpart.
( c ) Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered pursuant to this subpart shall be subject to the same obligation imposed upon the Board and upon the trustees.
( d ) Any residual funds not required to defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be turned over to the Secretary to be used, to the extent practicable, in the interest of continuing one or more of the promotion, research, consumer information or industry information plans or projects authorized pursuant to this subpart.
[51 FR 26138, July 18, 1986; 51 FR 26686, July 25, 1986]
#### § 1402.1 General.

To facilitate trade through usual and customary channels, facilities, and arrangements of trade and commerce, the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) will disseminate general sales offering information on the Farm Service Agency's (FSA) Commodity Operations Web site located on the Worldwide Web at *http://www.fsa.usda.gov/daco/default.htm.* The Web site will be reviewed and amended as necessary to reflect current general sales offering information. CCC will make regular amendments as necessary deleting or adding to the sales provisions or changing prices or methods of sales. The information posted at this Web site is for the purpose of public information and does not constitute an offer to sell by CCC or an invitation for offers to purchase from CCC. CCC may make its commodities available for sale without prior notification to storing warehouse operators. Information pertaining to opportunities to purchase commodities from CCC will be published on the FSA Commodity Operations Web site when such opportunities are available.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Bonoreble Charles R. Martin County Auditor Barrison County Xarshell, Texas Dear Sir:

oi this departme requesting ,th* o inion etion read8 a#foL mmI -49, Vernon’8 Cirll urt of sny oounty in or village my be

## sltuig8fm the line8 

## id appoint a board of

r8on8, two or lng physlolans. n snah 

### appointeer shall be
Does the Ccdamiseianers* Court have the loge1 right to ciompensete suah m&nbers of the Board whoere aotirely en&aged in health work under suoh authority. quoted sbovo, and in doing so randering a renlo0 to the o0unty7*

1Boaorablo Charles R. I&artln, page 2

Artlale 4435, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes prov5demt

“The Commiasloners~ Court or any County in rhioh anunlnoorporated town or village maybe situated, shall have power to designate the lines of suoh tom or village, andmayappoint a board of health iOr It, oonslstlng or three persons, two or moreof whomshell be regular praotlolng phy6lolans. Said Court whenauoh appointments are madeshall at onoe notify thti State Health Oirioer. Sal& board shall eleot one of their memberr a8presiding otrloer~ andeubh presiding orrloer, if the premises of any oltlzen residing within the presorlbed llmlte oi said town or v$llaga are in anunolean or unhealthy oondltlon, shall notify himor the teob, and that hexaustprooesd et on06 to olean the same.” Artiole 443.sr, Vamon*s Annotated 

### Clvll Statufm provides in part!

n TheCoJnlasloners* Oourt or eny Qounty shall ia;emt&a authority to approprlats and expand moneyima the general revenues of its Oounty for and In behalf of pub110 health andsanitation within its County.” In view ot the 

### foregoing statutes you are respaotfully advised that it is the opinion or thle dspartment that the CornmIasIonsrs* Court has legal 

### authority to oompensate the member8 or aboard or health appointed by virtue of Artlole 443b, rrupra, for servloos aotually **p6frorm6d** by the members or the board ln bahalf of pub110 health and sanltatlon. Whether or not suoh membersshall be oompensatsd for their aervloes le amstter wholly within the dleoretlon of the Coma%s8loriers* Court. Yours very truly ATTORNEY G- OF p?xAs

w/xawL.- BY Ardell Williams

Aseletant
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMeasurements of pressures on the tail and aft fuselage of an airplane model during rotary motions at spin attitudesAn investigation was conducted in the Langley Spin Tunnel to measure the pressures on the surface of the horizontal and vertical tail and the aft fuselage of an aircraft model. The pressures were measured on a model of a proposed Australian Primary Trainer airplane configuration while the model was rotating at spinning attitudes. The test results indicate that the presence of the horizontal tail adversely modifies the surface pressure on the vertical tail. The presence of the wing also adversely modifies the pressures on the horizontal and vertical tails.Document ID19900001513Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBowman, James S., Jr.*(Bihrle Applied Research, Inc., Jericho NY., United States)*Hultberg, Randy S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Martin, Colin A.*(Aeronautical Research Labs. Melbourne, Australia)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1989Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2939L-16570NASA-TP-2939Accession Number90N10829Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-71Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900001513.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 1220.208 Removal.

If the Secretary determines that any person appointed under this part fails or refuses to perform his or her duties properly or engages in acts of dishonesty or willful misconduct, the Secretary shall remove the person from office. A person appointed or certified under this part or any employee of the Board or Committee may be removed by the Secretary if the Secretary determines that the person's continued service would be detrimental to the purposes of the Act.
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Richard A. Smith, Chief Executive Officer and President of Securus Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/RICHARD A. SMITH                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Richard A. Smith                          |
|   | *Chief Executive Officer and President*** |
|   | August 13, 2008                           |