Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Notices 13291 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

47731 (August 6, 2020). 

2See Heze Huayi’s Letter, ‘‘Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China: 

No Sales Certification,’’ dated September 8, 2020; 

see also Kangtai’s Letter, ‘‘Chlorinated 

Isocyanurates from the People’s Republic of China: 

No Sales Certification,’’ dated September 8, 2020. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) Data for Heze Huayi Chemical Co., 

Ltd. and Juancheng Kangtai Chemical Co., Ltd.,’’ 

dated November 17, 2020. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the 2019–2020 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

5 Id. 

clad aluminum sheet. With respect to not 

clad aluminum sheet, common alloy sheet is 

manufactured from a 1XXX-, 3XXX-, or 

5XXX-series alloy as designated by the 

Aluminum Association. With respect to 

multi-alloy, clad aluminum sheet, common 

alloy sheet is produced from a 3XXX-series 

core, to which cladding layers are applied to 

either one or both sides of the core. The use 

of a proprietary alloy or non-proprietary alloy 

that is not specifically registered by the 

Aluminum Association as a discrete 

1XXX-, 3XXX-, or 5XXX-series alloy, but that 

otherwise has a chemistry that is consistent 

with these designations, does not remove an 

otherwise in-scope product from the scope. 

Common alloy sheet may be made to 

ASTM specification B209–14 but can also be 

made to other specifications. Regardless of 

specification, however, all common alloy 

sheet meeting the scope description is 

included in the scope. Subject merchandise 

includes common alloy sheet that has been 

further processed in a third country, 

including but not limited to annealing, 

tempering, painting, varnishing, trimming, 

cutting, punching, and/or slitting, or any 

other processing that would not otherwise 

remove the merchandise from the scope of 

this investigation if performed in the country 

of manufacture of the common alloy sheet. 

Excluded from the scope of this 

investigation is aluminum can stock, which 

is suitable for use in the manufacture of 

aluminum beverage cans, lids of such cans, 

or tabs used to open such cans. Aluminum 

can stock is produced to gauges that range 

from 0.200 mm to 0.292 mm, and has an 

H–19, H–41, H–48, H–39, or H–391 temper. 

In addition, aluminum can stock has a 

lubricant applied to the flat surfaces of the 

can stock to facilitate its movement through 

machines used in the manufacture of 

beverage cans. Aluminum can stock is 

properly classified under Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings 7606.12.3045 and 7606.12.3055. 

Where the nominal and actual 

measurements vary, a product is within the 

scope if application of either the nominal or 

actual measurement would place it within 

the scope based on the definitions set for the 

above. 

Common alloy sheet is currently 

classifiable under HTSUS subheadings 

7606.11.3060, 7606.11.6000, 7606.12.3096, 

7606.12.6000, 7606.91.3095, 7606.91.6095, 

7606.92.3035, and 7606.92.6095. Further, 

merchandise that falls within the scope of 

this investigation may also be entered into 

the United States under HTSUS subheadings 

7606.11.3030, 7606.12.3015, 7606.12.3025, 

7606.12.3035, 7606.12.3091, 7606.91.3055, 

7606.91.6055, 7606.92.3025, 7606.92.6055, 

7607.11.9090. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

description of the scope of this investigation 

is dispositive. 

Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Investigation 

IV. Application of Adverse Facts Available 

(AFA) Concerning the Specificity of the 

Ex-Tarifario and Lei do Bem Programs 

V. Subsidies Valuation 

VI. Analysis of Programs 

VII. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Applied 

Appropriate Negligibility and De 

Minimis Thresholds 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Correctly 

Analyzed Benefit for the Integrated 

Drawback Program 

Comment 3: Whether the Integrated 

Drawback Program Provides Excessive 

Remission 

Comment 4: Whether Furnas’ Sales of 

Electricity to Companhia Brasileiro de 

Aluminio (CBA) are a Countervailable 

Subsidy 

Comment 5: Whether the Ex-Tarifario 

Program Provides a Financial 

Contribution and Is Specific 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Was 

Correct To Apply Adverse Facts 

Available (AFA) To Find the Lei do Bem 

Program De Facto Specific 

Comment 7: Whether the BNDES Finame 

Program Is Specific 

Comment 8: Whether the Espirito Santo 

ICMS Reduction Program Is Specific or 

Tied to Non-Subject Merchandise 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–04724 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–898] 

Chlorinated Isocyanurates From the 

People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. (Heze 

Huayi) and Juancheng Kangtai Chemical 

Co., Ltd. (Kangtai), the only two 

companies subject to review, did not 

have any shipments of subject 

merchandise during the period of 

review (POR), June 1, 2019, through 

May 31, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable March 8, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Carey, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3964. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 6, 2020, Commerce 

initiated the administrative review of 

the AD order on chlorinated 

isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from 

China covering the period June 1, 2019, 

through May 31, 2020.1 The petitioners 

in this review are Bio-lab, Inc., Clearon 

Corp., and Occidental Chemical Corp. 

(collectively, the petitioners). This 

review covers two producers/exporters: 

Heze Huayi and Kangtai. On September 

8, 2020, Heze Huayi and Kangtai both 

certified that their respective companies 

had no entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR.2 Based on our review 

of U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

data, we preliminarily found that Heze 

Huayi and Kangtai had no entries of 

subject merchandise originating from 

China, that were subject to antidumping 

duties during the POR.3

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4 A 

list of topics included in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

included as Appendix I to this notice. 

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. The signed and the electronic 

versions of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the order are 

chlorinated isos, which are derivatives 

of cyanuric acid, described as 

chlorinated s-triazine triones. For a full 

description of the scope of the order, see 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.5


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
13292 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Notices 

6See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011); see also the 

‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below. 

7See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

8See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value: Chlorinated Isocyanurates 

from the People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 24502, 

24505 (May 10, 2005) (Chlorinated Isos 

Investigation). 

9See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2). 

10See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

11See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

12See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

13See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 14See Chlorinated Isos Investigation. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 

19 CFR 351.213. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Based on the available record 

information, Commerce preliminarily 

determines that Heze Huayi and Kangtai 

had no shipments during the POR. For 

additional information regarding this 

determination, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. Consistent with 

our assessment practice in non-market 

economy administrative reviews, 

Commerce is not rescinding this review 

for Heze Huayi and Kangtai, but intends 

to complete the review and issue 

appropriate instructions to CBP based 

on the final results of the review.6

China-Wide Entity 

Commerce’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.7 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review 

unless a party specifically requests, or 

Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity, and we 

did not self-initiate a review, the Chinawide entity rate (i.e., 285.63 percent) is 

not subject to change as a result of this 

review.8 Aside from Heze Huayi and 

Kangtai, no other companies requested 

a review. For additional information, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Public Comment 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(c), case briefs or other written 

comments may be submitted to the 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance no later than 30 days after 

the date of publication of these 

preliminary results, unless the Secretary 

alters the time limit. Rebuttal briefs, 

limited to issues raised in case briefs, 

may be submitted no later than seven 

days after the deadline date for case 

briefs.9 Parties who submit case briefs or 

rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

requested to submit with each with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities. Note that 

Commerce has temporarily modified 

certain of its requirements for serving 

documents containing business 

proprietary information, until further 

notice.10

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, within 30 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice.11 Requests should contain: (1) 

The party’s name, address and 

telephone number; (2) The number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a 

request for a hearing is made, Commerce 

intends to hold the hearing at a date and 

time to be determined.12 Parties should 

confirm the date, time, and location of 

the hearing two days before the 

scheduled date. 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

which will include the results of our 

analysis of all issues raised in the case 

briefs, within 120 days of publication of 

these preliminary results in the Federal 

Register, unless extended, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuing the final results of this 

review, Commerce shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries covered by 

this review.13 We intend to liquidate 

entries containing subject merchandise 

exported by the companies under 

review that we determine in the final 

results to be part of the China-wide 

entity at the China-wide rate of 285.63 

percent. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that have separate rates, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing producer/exporter-specific 

combination rate published for the most 

recent period; (2) for all Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found to be eligible for a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the China-wide rate of 285.63 

percent; 14 and (3) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Chinese exporter(s) 

that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: March 2, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–04765 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES