Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 146 / Thursday, July 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 45435 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing this action 

and other required information to the 

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. A major rule cannot take effect 

until 60 days after it is published in the 

Federal Register. This action is not a 

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by September 28, 2015. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review, nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of the Federal Register, rather than file 

an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

the EPA can withdraw this direct final 

rule and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Particulate matter, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: July 8, 2015. 

Dennis J. McLerran, 

Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart MM—Oregon 

■ 2. In § 52.1970, paragraph (e), the 

table entitled ‘‘State of Oregon Air 

Quality Control Program’’ is amended 

by adding a new entry for ‘‘Section 4’’ 

to read as follows: 

§ 52.1970 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

STATE OF OREGON AIR QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM

SIP citation Title/subject 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanations 

*******

Section 4 ...................................... Grants Pass Second 10-Year 

PM10 Limited Maintenance 

Plan.

4/16/2015 7/30/2015 .....................................

[Insert Federal Register citation].

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–18354 Filed 7–29–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0889; FRL–9929–74] 

Zeta-Cypermethrin; Pesticide 

Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation amends the 

tolerances for residues of zetacypermethrin in or on corn, field, 

forage; corn, field, stover; and corn, pop, 

stover. FMC Corporation requested 

these tolerances under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective July 

30, 2015. Objections and requests for 

hearings must be received on or before 

September 28, 2015, and must be filed 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0889, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lewis, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 


Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
45436 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 146 / Thursday, July 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR 

site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/

40tab_02.tpl. 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2014–0889 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before September 28, 2015. Addresses 

for mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 40 

CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2014–0889, by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be CBI or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at http:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. Summary of Petitioned-For 

Tolerance 

In the Federal Register of January 28, 

2015 (80 FR 4525) (FRL–9921–55), EPA 

issued a document pursuant to FFDCA 

section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), 

announcing the filing of a pesticide 

petition (PP 4F8290) by FMC 

Corporation, 1735 Market St., 

Philadelphia, PA 19103. The petition 

requested to amend the tolerances in 40 

CFR 180.418 for residues of the 

insecticide zeta-cypermethrin, S-cyano 

(3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl (±))(cis-trans 

3-(2-2-dichloroethenyl)-2,2 

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, in or 

on corn, field, forage from 0.2 parts per 

million (ppm) to 9.0 ppm; corn, field, 

stover from 3.0 ppm to 30.0 ppm; and 

corn, pop, stover from 3.0 ppm to 30.0 

ppm. That document referenced a 

summary of the petition prepared by 

FMC Corporation, the registrant, which 

is available in the docket, http://

www.regulations.gov. Comments were 

received on the notice of filing. EPA’s 

response to these comments is 

discussed in Unit IV.C. 

Instead of the proposed tolerances in 

field corn stover (30.0 ppm) and 

popcorn stover (30.0 ppm), the Agency 

is establishing the tolerances at 30 ppm. 

The Agency establishes tolerances using 

whole numbers for tolerances of 10 ppm 

or more, per the OECD’s User Guide 

ENV/JM/MONO (2011)2 for the OECD 

tolerance calculation procedure. 

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and 

Determination of Safety 

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA 

allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the 

legal limit for a pesticide chemical 

residue in or on a food) only if EPA 

determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’ 

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA 

defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from aggregate exposure to the 

pesticide chemical residue, including 

all anticipated dietary exposures and all 

other exposures for which there is 

reliable information.’’ This includes 

exposure through drinking water and in 

residential settings, but does not include 

occupational exposure. Section 

408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 

give special consideration to exposure 

of infants and children to the pesticide 

chemical residue in establishing a 

tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to infants and children from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide 

chemical residue. . . .’’ 

Consistent with FFDCA section 

408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in 

FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has 

reviewed the available scientific data 

and other relevant information in 

support of this action. EPA has 

sufficient data to assess the hazards of 

and to make a determination on 

aggregate exposure for zetacypermethrin including exposure 

resulting from the tolerances established 

by this action. EPA’s assessment of 

exposures and risks associated with 

zeta-cypermethrin follows. 

Zeta-cypermethrin is an enriched 

isomer of the pyrethroid insecticide 

cypermethrin. In addition, alphacypermethrin is also an enriched isomer 

of cypermethrin. Although 

cypermethrin, zeta-cypermethrin, and 

alpha-cypermethrin are separate active 

ingredients with different end-use 

products, they are included together in 

the hazard evaluation for the purpose of 

human health risk assessment. The 

toxicology database for the 

cypermethrins includes studies with 

cypermethrin and both of its enriched 

isomers, and is considered complete for 

the purpose of risk assessment. 

The aggregate risk assessment for zetacypermethrin must consider potential 

exposure from all cypermethrins (i.e., 

cypermethrin, zeta-cypermethrin, and 

alpha-cypermethrin), since the three 

active ingredients are considered to be 

essentially the same from the 

mammalian toxicity perspective. The 

revised tolerances are associated with 

decreased pre-harvest intervals (PHIs) 

for field corn and popcorn—from 30 

days for grain and stover and 60 days for 

forage to 7 days for all these 

commodities—and have no impact on 

the existing dietary exposure assessment 

for the cypermethrins. Corn forage and 

stover are livestock feed items and are 

not directly entered into the dietary 

exposure assessment, and EPA has 

determined that the existing tolerances 

for livestock commodities are adequate 

to support the changed use pattern. The 

existing zeta-cypermethrin use on corn 

was included in previous dietary 

exposure assessments. Decreasing the 

PHI and increasing the zetacypermethrin tolerances for field corn 

forage, field corn stover, and popcorn 

stover will have no impact on the 

dietary risk estimates, as they are 

already covered in the existing dietary 

assessment. 

In the final rule published in the 

Federal Register of December 7, 2012 


Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 146 / Thursday, July 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 45437 

(77 FR 72975) (FRL–9371–7), EPA 

established tolerances for residues of 

zeta-cypermethrin in multiple 

commodities. Since the publication of 

that final rule, the toxicity profile of 

zeta-cypermethrin has not changed, and 

since the revised tolerances associated 

with decreased PHIs for field corn and 

popcorn have no impact on the existing 

dietary and aggregate risk 

determinations, the risk assessments 

that supported the establishment of the 

zeta-cypermethrin tolerances published 

in the December 7, 2012 Federal 

Register final rule remain valid. 

Therefore, EPA is relying on those risk 

assessments in order to support the 

revised tolerances for zeta-cypermethrin 

in field corn forage, field corn stover, 

and popcorn stover. 

An updated aggregate risk assessment 

was not needed to support the proposed 

increased tolerances for residues in field 

corn forage, field corn stover, and 

popcorn stover, and the increased 

tolerances will not result in a change in 

the previously estimated dietary (food 

and water) or residential exposure 

estimates for zeta-cypermethrin. For a 

detailed discussion of the aggregate risk 

assessments and determination of 

safety, refer to the December 7, 2012 

Federal Register final rule and its 

supporting documents, available at 

http://www.regulations.gov in docket ID 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0472. EPA 

is relying on those supporting risk 

assessments and findings to support this 

final rule. 

Based on the risk assessments and 

information described in this unit, EPA 

concludes that there is a reasonable 

certainty that no harm will result to the 

general population, or to infants and 

children, from aggregate exposure to 

zeta-cypermethrin residues. Additional 

information can be found in the 

document: ‘‘Zeta-Cypermethrin— 

Human Health Risk Assessment for a 

Petition to Amend (Increase) the 

Established Tolerances for the 

Insecticide in Field Corn and Popcorn 

Stover, and in Field Corn Forage,’’ 

available in docket ID number EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2014–0889. 

IV. Other Considerations 

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology 

Adequate tolerance enforcement 

methods are available in Pesticide 

Analytical Manual (PAM) Volume II for 

determining residues of alphacypermethrin, cypermethrin, and zetacypermethrin in plant (Method I) and 

livestock (Method II) commodities. Both 

methods are gas chromatographic 

methods with electron-capture detection 

(GC/ECD), and have undergone 

successful Agency petition method 

validations (PMVs). These methods are 

not stereospecific; thus no distinction is 

made between residues of cypermethrin 

(all 8 stereoisomers), alphacypermethrin (enriched in 2 isomers), 

and zeta-cypermethrin (enriched in 4 

isomers). The January 1994 Food and 

Drug Administration (FDA) PESTDATA 

database (PAM Volume I) indicates that 

residues of cypermethrin are completely 

recovered (>80%) using multi-residue 

method sections 302 (Luke), 303 (Mills, 

Onley, and Gaither), and 304 (Mills fatty 

food). 

B. International Residue Limits 

In making its tolerance decisions, EPA 

seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with 

international standards whenever 

possible, consistent with U.S. food 

safety standards and agricultural 

practices. EPA considers the 

international maximum residue limits 

(MRLs) established by the Codex 

Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as 

required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). 

The Codex Alimentarius is a joint 

United Nations Food and Agriculture 

Organization/World Health 

Organization food standards program, 

and it is recognized as an international 

food safety standards-setting 

organization in trade agreements to 

which the United States is a party. EPA 

may establish a tolerance that is 

different from a Codex MRL; however, 

FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that 

EPA explain the reasons for departing 

from the Codex level. 

There are no Codex MRLs for 

cypermethrin, which includes both 

alpha- and zeta-cypermethrin, 

established in corn forage or stover. 

C. Response to Comments 

One comment was received from the 

general public, urging the Agency to 

deny the request. The commenter 

particularly addressed toxicity to bees 

and other insects, and human 

toxicological and reproductive effects. 

The Agency understands the 

commenter’s concerns, and recognizes 

that some individuals believe that 

certain pesticide chemicals should not 

be permitted in food. Regarding effects 

to bees and other insects, the safety 

standard for approving tolerances under 

section 408 of FFDCA focuses on 

potential harms to human health and 

does not permit consideration of effects 

on other species or the environment. 

The existing legal framework provided 

by section 408 of FFDCA states that 

tolerances may be set when persons 

seeking such tolerances or exemptions 

have demonstrated that the pesticide 

meets the safety standard imposed by 

that statute. When new or amended 

tolerances are requested for residues of 

a pesticide in food or feed, the Agency, 

as is required by Section 408 of FFDCA, 

estimates the risk of the potential 

exposure to these residues by 

performing an aggregate risk assessment. 

Such a risk assessment integrates the 

individual assessments that are 

conducted for food, drinking water, and 

residential exposures. Additionally, the 

Agency, as is further required by 

Section 408 of the FFDCA, considers 

available information concerning what 

are termed the cumulative toxicological 

effects of the residues of that pesticide 

and of other substances having a 

common mechanism of toxicity. 

Therefore, these assessments consider 

both exposure and toxicological 

effects—including information 

concerning the reproductive effects of 

the pesticide—in reaching a conclusion 

as to whether or not the reasonable 

certainty of no harm decision can be 

made. The Agency has concluded after 

this assessment that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from exposure to the residues of 

zeta-cypermethrin. Therefore, the 

proposed tolerances are found to be 

acceptable. 

V. Conclusion 

Therefore, tolerances are established 

for residues of zeta-cypermethrin, Scyano (3-phenoxyphenyl) methyl 

(±))(cis-trans 3-(2-2-dichloroethenyl)-2,2 

dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate, in or 

on corn, field, forage at 9.0 ppm; corn, 

field, stover at 30 ppm; and corn, pop, 

stover at 30 ppm. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This action establishes tolerances 

under FFDCA section 408(d) in 

response to a petition submitted to the 

Agency. The Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) has exempted these types 

of actions from review under Executive 

Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory 

Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993). Because this action 

has been exempted from review under 

Executive Order 12866, this action is 

not subject to Executive Order 13211, 

entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning 

Regulations That Significantly Affect 

Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 

FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive 

Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997). This action does not 

contain any information collections 

subject to OMB approval under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require 


Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
45438 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 146 / Thursday, July 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

any special considerations under 

Executive Order 12898, entitled 

‘‘Federal Actions to Address 

Environmental Justice in Minority 

Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as 

the tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), do not apply. 

This action directly regulates growers, 

food processors, food handlers, and food 

retailers, not States or tribes, nor does 

this action alter the relationships or 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities established by Congress 

in the preemption provisions of FFDCA 

section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency 

has determined that this action will not 

have a substantial direct effect on States 

or tribal governments, on the 

relationship between the national 

government and the States or tribal 

governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined 

that Executive Order 13132, entitled 

‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999) and Executive Order 13175, 

entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 

67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply 

to this action. In addition, this action 

does not impose any enforceable duty or 

contain any unfunded mandate as 

described under Title II of the Unfunded 

Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 

1501 et seq.). 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act 

(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

VII. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: July 22, 2015. 

Susan Lewis, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.418, revise the entries for 

‘‘corn, field, forage,’’ ‘‘corn, field, 

stover,’’ and ‘‘corn, pop, stover’’ in the 

table in paragraph (a)(2) to read as 

follows: 

§ 180.418 Cypermethrin and isomers 

alpha-cypermethrin and zeta-cypermethrin; 

tolerances for residues. 

(a) * * * 

(2) * * * 

Commodity Parts per 

million 

*****

Corn, field, forage ................. 9.0 

*****

Corn, field, stover ................. 30 

*****

Corn, pop, stover .................. 30 

*****

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–18737 Filed 7–29–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0138; FRL–9923–86] 

Isofetamid; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances for residues of isofetamid in 

or on multiple commodities that are 

identified and discussed later in this 

document. ISK Biosciences Corporation 

requested these tolerances under the 

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 

(FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective July 

30, 2015. Objections and requests for 

hearings must be received on or before 

September 28, 2015, and must be filed 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0138, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lewis, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

703–305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 


Lhorne on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES