Lookouts, Latrines, and 

Lodgepole Cabins 

United States 

Department of 

Agriculture 

Forest Service 

Intermountain 

Region 

Bridger-Teton 

National Forest 

March 2003 

Administrative Facilities of Wyoming’s 

Bridger-Teton National Forest, 1904-1955

 

 Volume Two: Evaluations 

Forest Service Report No. BT-02-637 

 
Lookouts, Latrines, and 

Lodgepole Cabins 

Administrative Facilities of Wyoming’s 

Bridger-Teton National Forest, 1904-1955 

Volume II: Evaluations 

Forest Service Report No. BT-02-637 

By 

Jim Bailey, Ph.D. 

Architectural Historian 

USDA Forest Service 

Intermountain Region Facilities Group 

324 25th Street 

Ogden, UT 84401 

801-625-5704 

(Contact: Richa Wilson, Regional Architectural Historian, at above)

 
Cover: Monument Ridge Fire Lookout, Big Piney Ranger District. Jim Bailey/USFS 

Photo 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs

and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability,

political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases 

apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for 

communication of program information (Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should 

contact USDA’s TARGET center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). 

To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 

Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-

9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider

and employer. 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

CHAPTER ONE: RESOURCE IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION............. 1

THEMES AND RESOURCE TYPES............................................................................. 1

PRIMARY THEME.......................................................................................................... 1

SUB-THEMES................................................................................................................. 3

NATIONAL REGISTER PROPERTY DEFINITIONS..................................................... 3

EVALUATION METHODOLOGY: CRITERIA.............................................................. 3

CRITERIA CONSIDERATIONS ..................................................................................... 4

CONTRIBUTING AND NONCONTRIBUTING RESOURCES................................ 6

FEATURES AND ASPECTS OF INTEGRITY, RARITY, AND UNIQUENESS.............. 6

B-T SITES EVALUATED: FIELD SEASON 2001, BY DISTRICTS......................... 7

SITES NOT EVALUATED .............................................................................................. 8

ELIGIBILTY PERCENTAGES........................................................................................ 9

CHAPTER TWO: EVALUATION SUMMARIES, BRIDGER DIVISION............ 10

HISTORIC SITE AND BUILDING SUMMARIES........................................................ 10

Kemmerer Ranger District D-1 ..................................................................................... 11

Elk Creek Guard Station............................................................................................... 12

Kemmerer Garage ........................................................................................................ 13

LaBarge Guard Station................................................................................................. 15

Scaler Guard Station..................................................................................................... 17

Big Piney Ranger District D-2 ....................................................................................... 19

Big Piney Barn............................................................................................................. 20

Big Piney 440 Smith...................................................................................................... 22

Deadline Ridge Fire Lookout........................................................................................ 24

Hoback Guard Station .................................................................................................. 25

Monument Ridge Fire Lookout ..................................................................................... 27

Prospect Peak Fire Lookout ......................................................................................... 28

Sherman Guard Station................................................................................................. 30

Wyoming Peak Fire Lookout ........................................................................................ 32

 
Greys River Ranger District D-3................................................................................... 33

Afton Complex............................................................................................................... 34

Cabin Creek Lookout .................................................................................................... 37

Cazier Guard Station .................................................................................................... 38

Deadman Mountain Fire Lookout ............................................................................... 40

Deer Creek Guard Station ............................................................................................ 41

McCain Guard Station.................................................................................................. 43

Meadows Guard Station ............................................................................................... 44

Osmond Barn ................................................................................................................ 46

Pinedale Ranger District D-7 ......................................................................................... 47

Dutch Joe Guard Station .............................................................................................. 48

Elkhart Park Guard Station.......................................................................................... 50

Kendall Guard Station .................................................................................................. 52

Pinedale Barn ............................................................................................................... 54

Pinedale: 243 West Pine............................................................................................... 55

Pinedale: 332 North Franklin....................................................................................... 57

Willow Creek Guard Station......................................................................................... 59

CHAPTER THREE: EVALUATION SUMMARIES, TETON DIVISION........... 61

HISTORIC DISTRICT AND BUILDING SUMMARIES............................................... 61

Jackson Ranger District D-4.......................................................................................... 62

Bryan Flat Guard Station ............................................................................................. 63

Goosewing Guard Station............................................................................................. 65

Buffalo Ranger District D-6 ........................................................................................... 67

Buffalo Administrative Site ........................................................................................... 68

Hawks Rest Patrol Cabin.............................................................................................. 71

Old Blackrock Office..................................................................................................... 73

 
CHAPTER ONE: RESOURCE IDENTIFICATION AND 

EVALUATION 

The historic context statement provided in Volume One of this report is the basis for

evaluating the administrative sites of the Bridger-Teton National Forest. It identifies 

periods and places, and is tied directly to the significant themes of Conservation,

Politics/Government, and Architecture. These themes are referred to as Areas of 

Significance in National Register Bulletin 16A. Pertinent themes and the types of 

resources that may have significance under them are discussed below. It must be noted 

that the evaluation’s focus is on administrative buildings and structures. 

THEMES AND RESOURCE TYPES 

PRIMARY THEME 

The primary theme, or area of significance, is Conservation, which is defined as “the 

preservation, maintenance, and management of natural or manmade resources” in National 

Register Bulletin 16A. This is supplemented by the Wyoming SHPO themes of Recreation

and Tourism and Ranching; these themes have been detailed in research drafts by SHPO 

Planning Coordinator Rheba Massey. 

Properties developed or used by the Forest Service for the purposes of administering and

managing National Forest lands represent these themes. Often referred to generically (and

sometimes formally) as administrative sites, these properties are the subject of this evaluation.

Periods of significance for these themes fall into four categories: 

• 1891-1907: Early Conservation of Western Lands 

• 1908-1929: Progressive Era, WWI, early Interwar 

• 1930-1942: Later Interwar, Depression, New Deal 

• 1943-1955: WWII, early Postwar 

A variety of potential resource types is associated with B-T forest administration and, 

consequently, the theme of Conservation. Those considered significant will usually be so 

under Criterion A. The following list expands and clarifies identified resource types: 

• Dwelling Site: A site developed for the sole purpose of providing housing for Forest 

Service employees, especially in small towns that lacked adequate housing. 

• Fire Lookout: Numerous fire lookouts were developed on the Bridger-Teton National 

Forest. None are currently manned. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 1
• Guard Station: Guard Station sites were historically occupied by Forest Guards and 

rangers during the summer. They were comprised of dwellings that often had 

secondary uses such as offices. Other outbuildings such as barns, latrines, garages,

and cellars were often constructed. The term is sometimes used interchangeably with

“ranger station.” 

• Ranger Station: The ranger station was historically the headquarters and home of the 

District Ranger. Typical buildings included the dwelling and garage, sometimes a

second dwelling for other staff, an office, and barn. Other buildings might include a

cellar, pump house, a gas/oil house, and a warehouse. The term is sometimes used 

interchangeably with “guard station.” 

• Supervisor’s Office: As forest headquarters, the Supervisor’s Office, or SO, had the 

most distinctive and often the greatest number of buildings. It usually had the same

types of buildings found at ranger stations, although often more numerous and larger. 

• Work Center: Archival information reveals that this term appeared during or after the 

New Deal when CCC camps were developed. It often refers to a site that is occupied 

by seasonal or temporary staff in bunkhouses. It also includes support structures such 

as warehouses, garages, shops, gas/oil houses, and fire caches. It can also include

shelter for horses and mules and related structures like corrals and pens. Presently, 

some historic ranger or guard stations are referred to as work centers. 

• Patrol Cabin: These structures are designed to house wilderness rangers and other

Forest Service personnel when working and traveling through wilderness lands. Most 

are small log cabins reinforced to withstand heavy snow loads and wildlife, such as

with shutters or rebar on windows and bear doors on entrances. 

Buildings and structures found on the sites defined above include: 

Agricultural: Barn, Hay Barn, Hay Shed, Tack Shed, Fly Shed 

Office: District of Supervisor’s Office, Visitor Information Center (VIC) 

Fire-Related: Fire Cache, Fire Lookout, Fire Prevention Office 

Residential/Domestic: Barracks, Bunkhouse, Shower or Bath House, Cabin, Dwelling, 

Cellar, Patrol Cabin, Latrine 

Utilitarian: Blacksmith Shop, Carpentry Shop, garage, Gas or Oil House, Generator Shed, 

Paint Shed, Pesticide Shed, Pump House, Power House, Shop, Sign Shop, Storage Shed, Tool 

Shed, Warehouse, Woodshed 

Landscape Features: Corral, Loading Ramp, Pasture, Fencing, Pens, Water Tanks 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 2
SUB-THEMES 

In addition to the primary theme of Conservation, there are a couple sub-themes related to 

Bridger-Teton administrative sites. These are: 

Architecture. As documented in Volume One, the historic context statement, there were

distinct periods of architectural development in Forest Service history. These administrative 

sites that clearly illustrate the features common to these periods or the evolution, transition, 

and variation between periods may be National Register eligible under Criterion C. 

Politics/Government: Depression-Era Relief Programs. Volume One documented the 

extensive work carried out on National Forest lands with the help of these programs. The 

availability of relief funds and labor led Forest Service architects and landscape architects to 

develop standard designs for the construction of new administrative sites along with the 

improvement of existing sites. The Civilian Conservation Corps, Works Progress

Administration, and local employment programs carried out most of the work. 

Resources considered significant under this sub-theme will usually be so under Criterion A. 

In addition to those described above, resource types related to this sub-theme include:

• Camp: A camp for relief workers such as those in the CCC could be quite extensive 

with barracks, tent platforms, mess halls, offices, etc. It could also be a temporary tent

site, or “spike camp,” used by workers in more remote locations. No buildings of this 

type remain on the B-T. 

• Landscape Features: Relief workers constructed a wide range of landscape features

such as roads, trails, telephone lines, and range improvements. These features are 

outside the scope of this evaluation. 

NATIONAL REGISTER PROPERTY DEFINITIONS 

Each recorded property has been classified by property type as defined in National Register 

Bulletin 15. Small groups of properties are listed under a single category, using the primary 

resource. For example, a guard station cabin, garage, and latrine as classified as buildings. A

larger compound of buildings and structures is considered a district, which “derives its 

importance from being a unified entity, even though it is often composed of a wide variety of 

resources.” Buildings or structures in a district may lack individual distinction, but a district 

may still be eligible if the grouping achieves distinction and significance as a whole. 

EVALUATION METHODOLOGY: CRITERIA

The evaluation of the recorded historic administrative sites is based on the standard model

instituted by the National Register. As guided by National Register Bulletins 15, 16A, and

16B, the sites must be historically significant under one of four established criteria and must

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 3
retain integrity. Historic properties may be significant at the local, state, or national levels 

under any of the following criteria: 

Criterion A: They are associated with events that have made a significant contribution

to the broad patterns of our history.

As noted previously, those resources associated with the primary theme of Conservation may

be eligible under this criterion. Although all of the surveyed resources are associated with this 

theme, not every one is “important in illustrating the historic context,” or “represents the 

context through specific historic associations.” Most B-T administrative buildings are eligible 

under Criterion A. 

Criterion B: They are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. 

Only one B-T site, the Old Blackrock Station, was nominated under Criterion B, with first 

District Ranger Rudolph Rosencrans listed as the significant individual (see Volume One). 

Criterion C: They embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of 

construction, or represent the work of a master, or possess high artistic values, or 

represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual 

distinction. 

Those resources that embody the distinctive characteristics of Forest Service architecture and 

site planning may be eligible under Criterion C. They may also be eligible if they represent 

the technical or aesthetic achievements of Forest Service architects and landscape architects 

identified in Volume One, such as Region Four architect George L. Nichols. Most B-T 

administrative buildings eligible under Criterion A are also eligible under Criterion C. 

Criterion D: They have yielded, or may likely to yield, information important to

prehistory or history. 

No B-T historic administrative sites are eligible under this criterion. It must be reiterated that 

the purpose of this evaluation was to determine eligibility of administrative buildings and 

structures. While some reconnaissance surveys were carried out by forest archeologists, most

sites were not examined for archeological significance, which typically falls under this 

Criterion. 

CRITERIA CONSIDERATIONS 

Certain types of properties are not considered eligible to the National Register. These include 

religious properties, moved properties, birthplaces and graves, cemeteries, reconstructed 

properties, and commemorative properties. 

Recent research has proved that moving and reconfiguring buildings is a significant historical 

trend for Forest Service administrative sites. These actions, carried out since the first years of 

the agency, were important in accommodating changing administrative needs and 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 4
management of public lands. For that reason, the relocations of Forest Service buildings are 

considered part of a historically important pattern or trend. Consequently, relocation should 

not be the sole reason for a determination of ineligibility. In addition, many moved buildings 

meet Criterion Consideration B. 

Criterion Consideration B warrants detailed discussion because of the number of moved 

administrative buildings on Forest Service sites. Normally, moved buildings are not 

considered eligible because the move negates historical relationships between property and 

surroundings. The move may also destroy associations with historic events and person. 

Historic features such as landscaping, foundations, and chimneys may also be lost. Criterion 

Consideration B states: 

A property removed from its original or historically significant location can be 

eligible if it is significant primarily for architectural value or it is the surviving 

property most importantly associated with a historic person or event. 

Properties that must meet this criterion consideration include:

• A resource moved from one location on its original site to another location on the 

property, during or after its Period of Significance. 

• A district in which a significant number of resources have been moved from their 

original locations. 

• A district that has one moved building that makes an especially significant 

contribution to the district. 

• A portable resource, such as a ship or railroad car, that is relocation to a place 

incompatible with its original function.

• A portable resource whose importance is critically linked to its historic location or

route and that is moved. 

Properties that do not need to meet this criterion include: 

• A property moved prior to its Period of Significance. 

• A district in which only a small percentage of typical buildings in a district are moved. 

• A portable resource that is eligible under Criterion C and is moved within its natural 

setting. 

• A property that is raised or lowered on its foundation. 

Those properties that are significant under Criterion C must retain enough historic features to 

convey its architectural values and must retain integrity of design, materials, workmanship, 

feeling and association. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 5
CONTRIBUTING AND NONCONTRIBUTING RESOURCES 

According to National Register Bulletin 16A, “the physical characteristics and historic 

significance of the overall property provide the basis for evaluating component resources.” 

Each building, structure, or object on site should be evaluated for its contribution to the site’s

significance. Those that are considered “contributing” add to the historic associations, historic

architectural qualities, or archeological values for which a property is significant because: 

• it was present during the period of significance, relates to the documented significance

of the property, and possesses historic integrity or is capable of yielding important 

information about the period; or 

• it independently meets National Register criteria. 

A resource is considered “noncontributing” if it does not add to the historic associations,

historic architectural qualities, or archeological values for which a property is significant 

because: 

• it was not present during the period of significance or does not relate to the

documented significance of the property; 

• due to alterations, disturbances, additions, or other changes it no longer posses historic 

integrity or is capable of yielding important information about the period; or 

• it does not independently meet the National Register criteria.

FEATURES AND ASPECTS OF INTEGRITY, RARITY, AND UNIQUENESS 

Integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance. The level of integrity is based 

on the degree of preservation and the amount of disturbance caused by alterations or loss of 

materials. In determining if a property has adequate integrity, it must retain “essential physical 

features,” which define both why a property is significant (criteria and themes) and when it

was significant (period of significance). There are seven aspects of integrity (location, design, 

setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association) and a property must retain several of

these to convey its significance. The essential physical features and relevant aspects of

integrity required for eligibility (according to National Register Bulletin 15, p.48) are as 

follows: 

• Criterion A: Resources significant under this criterion are eligible if they retain 

features from its period of association with Forest Service administration of public 

lands or Depression-era relief programs. The resource should retain some aspects of

integrity, although design and workmanship may not be as important as the others. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 6
• Criterion B: Resources significant under this criterion are eligible if they retain 

features from its period of association with an important individual. The resource

should retain some aspects of integrity, although design and workmanship may not be 

as important as the others. 

• Criterion C: Resources significant under this criterion are eligible if they retain most 

or all physical features that constitute the construction technique or architectural style. 

It is not eligible if it conveys massing but has lost the majority of the features that 

characterized it. The most important aspects of integrity are design, workmanship and 

materials. Location and setting will also be important for those resources whose

design is a reflection of their immediate environment (e.g., a bridge over a river). 

• Criterion D: Resources significant under this criterion may not have the type of

integrity described under the other criteria. They are considered eligible, however, if

the property’s potential to yield specific data addresses important research questions. 

Of the seven aspects, location, design, materials and possibly workmanship are the 

most important. 

 B-T SITES EVALUATED: FIELD SEASON 2001, BY DISTRICTS 

Region Four Architectural Historians James Bailey and Richa Wilson, as part of the 

National Historic Preservation Act’s Section 110 review process, evaluated the following 

32 sites during the 2001 field season. These are listed first. The 7 sites not reviewed by 

Bailey and Wilson were previously evaluated by B-T Archeologist Jamie Schoen. Those

interested in his findings should consult his evaluations. 

D-1: Kemmerer Ranger District 

 Elk Creek Ranger Station 

Kemmerer Warehouse 

LaBarge Guard Station 

Scaler Guard Station 

Schoen: Kelly (a.k.a. Kelley) Guard Station 

D-2: Big Piney Ranger District 

Big Piney 440 Nichols 

Big Piney Barn 

Deadline Ridge Lookout 

Hoback Guard Station 

Monument Ridge Lookout 

Prospect Peak Lookout 

Sherman Guard Station 

Wyoming Peak Lookout 

Schoen: Snider Basin Guard Station 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 7
D-3: Greys River Ranger District 

Afton Complex 

Cabin Creek Lookout 

Deadman Lookout (w/Bill Shields)

Cazier Guard Station 

Deer Creek Guard Station 

McCain Guard Station 

Meadows Guard Station 

Osmond Barn

Schoen: Elk Mountain Lookout 

D-4: Jackson Ranger District 

Bryan Flat Guard Station 

Goosewing Guard Station 

Schoen: Supervisor’s Office Complex 

 

D-6: Buffalo Ranger District 

Blackrock Work Center 

 Old Blackrock/Rosie’s Office 

Hawks Rest Patrol Cabin 

Schoen: Enos Lake Patrol Cabin 

Nowlin Meadows Patrol Cabin 

D-7: Pinedale Ranger District 

Pinedale: 243 W. Pine 

Pinedale: 332 N. Franklin 

Pinedale Barn 

Dutch Joe Guard Station

Elkhart Park Guard Station 

Kendall Guard Station 

Willow Creek Guard Station 

Schoen: South Fork Patrol Cabin 

SITES NOT EVALUATED

A few administrative sites were not evaluated by either Bailey/Wilson or Schoen, due to 

logistic problems or questions as to whether the buildings were historic. These 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 8
evaluations of sites in this document should provide the framework for future evaluations 

of these following sites: 

Cottonwood Work Center Cabins (D-4) 

Hatchet Cabins (D-6) 

Big Piney 240 Smith (D-2) 

Nelson Shed (D-4) 

Cross Lake Patrol Cabin (D-7) 

ELIGIBILTY PERCENTAGES 

Of the 75 B-T historic buildings surveyed in 2001, 77% were determined as contributing/ 

eligible, while 23% were determined non-contributing/not eligible. 

 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 9
CHAPTER TWO: EVALUATION SUMMARIES, BRIDGER 

DIVISION 

Of the 27 Bridger Division administrative sites surveyed in 2001, seven (25%) are 

eligible to the National Register as districts. Most or all of the buildings in an eligible

district are contributing resources, sometimes because they independently meet National 

Register criteria. Administrative sites that are not eligible as districts may have 

individually eligible buildings. 

HISTORIC SITE AND BUILDING SUMMARIES 

Administrative Unit Sites Eligible as 

Districts 

D-1: Kemmerer Ranger District 0 

D-2: Big Piney Ranger District 2 

D-3: Greys River Ranger District 3 

D-7: Pinedale Ranger District 2 

Total 7

 

Administrative Unit 

Contributing and/or 

Individually Eligible 

Buildings 

Non-Contributing* or 

Ineligible Buildings 

D-1: Kemmerer Ranger District 5 2 

D-2: Big Piney Ranger District 13 4 

D-3: Greys River Ranger District 15 2 

D-7: Pinedale Ranger District 14 5 

Total 47 13

*This count consists of historic buildings. Buildings that are not historic but are located 

in an eligible district are considered non-contributing. They are not included in this table. 

The following pages narrate the eligibility of each recorded administrative site and

historic building. They are organized by district within the Bridger Division. Summary 

tables include each property’s eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places. If 

evaluated as eligible, themes and areas of significance are included. 

All buildings listed are Contributing/Eligible, unless otherwise noted. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 10
KEMMERER RANGER DISTRICT D-1 

(Construction dates in parentheses)

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 11
ELK CREEK GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-LN-229 

It is recommended that Elk Creek Guard Station is eligible to the National Register of Historic 

Places under Criteria A and C, with a period of significance of 1914. Significant under the 

themes of architecture and conservation, it is a fine example of a log cabin-style, pre-New Deal 

Forest Service administrative building. Elk Creek Guard Station is also associated with the

Wyoming/Bridger National Forest's early history, as it is the oldest surviving building on this 

forest's southern reaches. 

Elk Creek Guard Station is the oldest surviving administrative building on

the Bridger Division. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

There is no record of any formal land withdrawal, nor who constructed the cabin. Built in 1914,

the station's rangers monitored livestock numbers, regulated timber activity, and performed fire 

control. Timber control was especially crucial, for in the early 1900's large-scale logging 

operations dominated the Hams Fork region. Tie hacks cut and milled railroad ties and mine 

props to be floated down the Hams Fork River to the railhead at Kemmerer. Elk Creek Guard

Station was instrumental in monitoring these activities. 

Currently, the station is used as an interpretive site. The structure is enclosed within a buck and 

pole fence to repel cows, and an interpretive sign details the building's role in early forest history.

Evaluations in 1985 and 1995 recommended Elk Creek Guard Station as eligible to the National 

Register under Criteria A and C. This evaluation supports previous recommendations. 

Elk Creek Guard Station, Facility #BT-KE-4020 (1914) 

Because of its continued association with pre-New Deal Wyoming/Bridger National Forest

history, the Elk Creek Guard Station rates high in all integrity categories. It well represents the 

small, log-cabin vernacular ranger station common in the Forest Service's early years, and despite

some minor structural upgrades, has retained its historic integrity over the last 90 years. Not 

many of these cabins exist, and Elk Creek Guard Station is the oldest surviving 

administrative/interpretive site still in its original location on the Bridger-Teton National Forest. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 12
KEMMERER GARAGE 

Smithsonian #48-LN-3888 

The Kemmerer Garage, a modified R4 Plan 21 with rear oil room. Jim 

Bailey/USFS Photo 

It is recommended that the Kemmerer Garage is not eligible to the National Register of Historic 

Places. Although constructed from a special Region Four plan as a flammables storage/garage

facility, the building is not special enough to be considered under the National Register's 

Criterion C, that of Design and Construction. There are other Plan 21 Garages on the forest that 

are better representatives of this particular floor plan. Additionally, the loss of the garage's

companion warehouse in a 1969 fire substantially altered the historic character of this in-town 

administrative site. 

The Bridger National Forest found it difficult to lease adequate warehouse space in Kemmerer so

when CCC labor and funds became available in 1935 the forest proposed constructing a 

warehouse/work center facility. Regional Architect George L. Nichols designed two buildings: a 

large warehouse and a smaller combination garage/oil house. Although Nichols devised a special 

plan for the warehouse, the garage followed the standard Region 4 Plan 21 Two-Car Garage and

Storeroom floor plan. Considered a versatile floor plan, the Plan 21’s smaller rear storeroom

would be designed and built from the ground up as a fireproof flammables storage area – one 

isolated from the main garage section. 

In 1935, local citizens E.L. Smith and J.R. Marquis donated two of the 40’ x 140’ lots for the 

proposed complex; the next year, the Forest Service paid Smith $150 for two more lots. CCC 

workers constructed both buildings in 1936. The huge, two-floor warehouse, which cost just 

under $9,000 to build, had a frost-proof basement, storerooms, and an extensive vehicle repair 

shop. It was also wired for electricity, had sewage and water systems installed, and was equipped

with a sprinkler system for fire safety. 

Thirty-three years later, on September 29, 1969, a fire erupted among old mattresses in the 

warehouse’s basement. The intense blaze spread upward and through the first floor, then quickly 

burned its way through the roof. Fearing the fire might spread into the adjoining residential area, 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 13
Kemmerer police and Lincoln County deputies evacuated nearby homes. After 6 hours, the fire 

was contained by weary volunteer firefighters who had to fight two other blazes earlier the same 

day. Although part of the warehouse escaped being destroyed, it was still a total loss, and was 

soon torn down. Remnants of the warehouse’s concrete foundation still exist. The smaller 

garage, however, escaped serious damage and still serves its purpose as a storage facility for the 

Kemmerer Ranger District. 

Kemmerer Garage, Facility # BT-KE-7016 (1936) *non-contributing/not eligible

The Kemmerer Garage rates low to medium in all aspects of integrity. Although the building

follows a special plan, it is not the best representative of its specific floor plan on the forest. Plan 

21 garages at Afton and Meadows Guard Station better represent administrative building design

trends of the 1930s. Additionally, the loss of its companion warehouse negatively affected the 

site's overall integrity. The multi-building compound is an important characteristic of Forest 

Service New Deal-era administrative sites, and with the loss of the warehouse, there is no longer

a compound.

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 14
LABARGE GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-LN-3027 

It is recommended that LaBarge Guard Station is eligible to the National Register of Historic 

Places under Criteria A and C, with a period of significance of 1933. Significant under the 

themes of architecture, conservation, and politics/government, it is a highly intact example of a 

remote Forest Service administrative site designed and constructed during the New Deal. 

Contributing elements include the bunkhouse and a small storage shed. A modern outhouse is

considered non-contributing/not eligible. 

The Lander Cutoff of the Oregon Trail runs directly behind LaBarge Guard Station’s bunkhouse. Jim 

Bailey/USFS Photo 

The site is also significant in regional history, as the Lander Cutoff of the Oregon Trail runs 

adjacent to guard station land. Although the statewide theme of Transportation/Trails is not 

within the context of this evaluation, the site has significance in this area for its proximity to the 

cutoff. Named after engineer Frederick West Lander and constructed in the late 1850s, the cutoff 

was one of the last established westward trails. Intended as a faster route for California-bound 

mail and emigrants, the Lander Cutoff stretched 354 miles from South Pass to where it rejoined

the main Oregon Trail west of Fort Hall, Idaho. Sections of the trail and wagon ruts are still

visible today in the southern reaches of the Bridger-Teton National Forest and adjoining public

lands. 

Just after the turn-of-the-century, tie-hacking activity reached its zenith in the southern Wyoming 

forests, with the area around the LaBarge Creek drainage receiving heavy activity. To monitor 

these operations, in 1912 the Forest Service constructed a small log cabin on this site-one similar 

(verified through historic photos) to the one that still stands at nearby Elk Creek Guard Station.

Forest rangers used this cabin as a temporary way station while performing their duties. In1933, 

the cabin was dismantled, and in its place the CCC constructed a bunkhouse, latrine, and shed. 

The first two followed standard plans designed by Regional Architect George L. Nichols, while 

the small shed did not follow any regional floor plan. Although site improvement plans from the 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 15
1930s do not show the shed, Forest Service building records list it as being built there in 1933.

Small landscape improvements were made to the site in 1935: corrals, fences, driveway, and 

walkways. In the early 1990s, the Forest Service removed the old latrine when they constructed 

the new one, which is sympathetic with the historic buildings. With the exception of the old 

latrine’s removal, LaBarge Guard Station has not changed much over the last seven decades. 

LaBarge Bunkhouse, Facility # BT-KE-4006 (1933) 

The LaBarge bunkhouse rates high in all integrity aspects except materials, which rates medium

due to minor alterations and replacements like the front porch floor and posts, the flush wood

exterior doors, the metal roof sheeting, and the vinyl bathroom window. Although

unsympathetic, they do not significantly impact the building's historic character. Thus, it is one

of the better examples of its particular regional floor plan (#5) on the forest. Period of

significance is 1933, with themes in architecture, conservation and politics/government. 

LaBarge Shed, Facility # BT-KE-9007 (1933)

As LaBarge Guard Station’s other contributing element, the shed rates high in all aspects of

integrity. Although somewhat hidden in a grove of lodgepole pines, it fits in well with its 

surrounding environment. A good example of a vernacular utilitarian structure, the shed appears 

to have been built from scrap materials obtained elsewhere, yet the workmanship is good. Period 

of significance is 1933, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 16
SCALER GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-LN-1689 

This unique lodgepole cabin at Scaler Guard Station is the only R4 Plan 7A on the 

B-T. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

It is recommended that the Scaler Guard Station is eligible to the National Register of Historic 

Places under Criteria A and C, with a period of significance of 1937. Significant under themes 

of architecture, conservation, and politics/government, this CCC-era guard station is associated

with early Forest Service management of timberlands. Scaler was especially important, for 

rangers working out of this remote guard station monitored extensive tie-hacking activities in the

South LaBarge Creek and other adjoining drainages during the 1930s and 1940s. Two historic 

buildings are considered contributing/eligible: a dwelling and outhouse. The guard station 

dwelling is the primary resource, while its associated outhouse contributes to the building's 

eligibility, as do site features such as the fencing and stone walk. Another historic building, a 

small wood shed, is considered non-contributing/not eligible, because it does not represent a 

strong association with the dwelling and outhouse, is not of a standard plan, nor is there any

information connecting it to the CCC or early Forest Service administration. Two other 

buildings, a generator shed and pump house, are modern and considered non-contributing/not

eligible. 

Although previous surveys questioned Scaler’s construction date, newly discovered photographic 

evidence indicates it was built later than other similar New Deal-era administrative sites. 1985 

surveys completed by district personnel mentioned that the guard station was built in 1933--yet it 

appears on no facilities improvement plans or maps from that time. This assertion proved wrong, 

for a picture dated January 1938 of workers standing in front of the main dwelling note that it was 

built between September and November 1937. This seems accurate, because another factor in

Scaler’s establishment was the 1937 creation of the huge South LaBarge Creek tie hack village, 

located near the guard station. Although long dismantled, some debris remnants of this camp are 

still evident. 

Scaler itself has not changed much over the last six decades. A two-car garage/barn once existed 

here, but sometime after 1985 it collapsed under the weight of too many heavy winters. Two

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 17
newer buildings, a small generator house and pump house, were built in the late 1980s, while the 

dwelling received a major renovation in the early 1990s. It is unknown as to when the small 

wood shed was built, but construction materials and techniques, as well as speculation based on 

other similar regional buildings, point to the early 1950s. Kemmerer Ranger District personnel

use the guard station for field housing in the summer, while it is rented to recreationists in the 

winter. 

Scaler Cabin, Facility #BT-KE-4009 (1937)

The dwelling at Scaler Guard Station rates medium to high in all integrity aspects. As the only

standard Plan 7A on the forest, it associates well with the surrounding built and natural landscape. 

Workmanship rates high, for the building’s log construction is unique, and showcases unusual 

corner work. Materials, however, rate somewhat lower, due to some modifications and 

alterations--like the metal roof and doors--that slightly distract from the building’s historic nature.

Period of significance is 1937, with themes in architecture, conservation, and

politics/government. 

Scaler Cabin Shed, Facility #BT-KE-9010 (c.1950) *non-contributing/not eligible 

Scaler’s wood shed does not represent a strong association with the guard station's primary

resource (the dwelling), is not built from a standard plan, nor is there any information that could 

tie it in with early Forest Service administration or the CCC. There is also the possibility that it is 

not even historic. 

Scaler Outhouse, Facility #BT-KE-1011 (1937) 

The Scaler Guard Station outhouse rates medium to high in location and setting aspects. 

Construction materials and workmanship, however, rate medium at best. As a result, since it does

not match up well with its companion dwelling, association and feeling is somewhat lessened. 

However, it is still a representative example of a 1930s guard station latrine, a truly popular

structure. Period of significance is 1937, with themes in architecture, conservation, and

politics/government.

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 18
BIG PINEY RANGER DISTRICT D-2 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 19
BIG PINEY BARN 

Smithsonian #48-SU-4360 

The barn at Big Piney Work Center south of town. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

It is recommended that the Big Piney Barn is not eligible to the National Register of Historic 

Places. Although associated with Forest Service administrative structures constructed during the 

New Deal, it has been moved from its original site approximately three-quarter of a mile west of 

town. It now sits at the rear of a modern work center south of Big Piney among newer mobile 

homes and a modern warehouse. For this reason, historical relationships between structure and 

site have been compromised. 

The original Big Piney barn, an old log structure, sat behind the old ranger dwelling at 240 Smith 

Street. In 1934, Forest Service and CCC workers dismantled the barn and used its logs to 

construct a Region 4 Plan 11 4-horse barn on a half-acre site donated by Josephine Budd west of 

town next to North Piney Creek. However, shortly after completion, on June 29, 1935, lightning

struck and destroyed the barn. In its place, in 1936 the CCC built a standard Region 4 Plan 12 6-

horse barn in its place. 

 

In 1964 and again in 1979, the Forest Service purchased 8-acre (1964) and 1.99-acre (1979) plots 

from Fear Ranches for a new, expanded new work center 1.5 miles south of town. Research did 

not produce a specific date--or reason--the agency removed the barn from its original site and 

moved it to the new work center. Based on forest-wide trends, the barn could have been moved

right after the 1964 purchase, because barn-shuffling from urban to rural areas by the Bridger

National Forest was common practice during this time. And although moving barns is a historic

Forest Service trend, not only is the site incompatible, Big Piney's barn is not unique. Two other 

Plan 12 barns (Pinedale and Goosewing Guard Station) still stand, with the Goosewing barn still 

in its original location. 

Right after the 1979 purchase, the Forest Service constructed a modern warehouse and a number 

of mobile home pads on this site (currently with mobile homes attached). These improvements

have negatively affected the setting's integrity, which severely diminishes the property's historical

relationship with this barn. The district still uses the barn for tack and feed storage. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 20
Big Piney Barn, Facility #BT-BP-8003 (1936) *non-contributing/not eligible 

The Big Piney Barn is one of three barns on the forest moved from towns to rural sites. This, 

along with the presence of modern buildings and trailer houses, result in low location and setting 

integrity and somewhat diminish the aspects of feeling and association. While the exterior is 

fairly intact, the interior has been significantly modified and has lost several important features, 

including stalls and grain bins. A better example of this specific standardized floor plan (#12) 

remains at Goosewing Guard Station. For these reasons, it is recommended that the Big Piney 

Barn is not eligible. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 21
BIG PINEY 440 SMITH 

Smithsonian #48-SU-1784 

440 Smith bunkhouse today. Note the partially enclosed 

front porch. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo

The 440 Smith Complex, Big Piney, right after construction. 

Note the “Temple Front” porch, which reflects Regional

Architect George L. Nichols vernacular interpretation of the

Classical Revival style. USFS Photo

It is recommended that the former Big Piney Ranger District Office compound (440 Smith Street, 

Big Piney) is eligible to the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A and C, with a

period of significance of 1933. Significant under the themes of architecture, conservation, and 

politics/government, it is a good example of a standardized Forest Service in-town administrative 

site designed and developed during this era and constructed by the Civilian Conservation Corps

(CCC). It is also significant in that with the exception of a couple utilitarian modifications to the 

bunkhouse, the site has retained a high degree of integrity from the original site plan developed in 

the mid-1930s. 

Before 1933, rangers patrolling the vast Big Piney Ranger District worked out of remote ranger 

stations like Snider Basin, Sherman, and North Cottonwood. This worked well in warm weather, 

for the rangers were closer to patrolling timber and range allotments. When the brutal winter 

weather hit this remote, barren section of Wyoming, however, rangers retreated to Big Piney and 

rented office space. When District Ranger Ed Cazier cited the need for permanent, year-round 

office space, in 1933 the town of Big Piney donated the .15-acre lot on the southeast corner of 

Smith and Nichols streets. The same year, the Forest Service and CCC built a Plan 51 Office and

Plan 23 Single Car Garage from standard plans developed by Regional Architect George L.

Nichols (below). Both buildings were painted Color Scheme One: white with light green and 

Nile green trim, common for in-town administrative sites. Following a site improvement plan, 

the agency landscaped the new administrative site a few years later, planting flowering bushes, 

installing a flagpole, and constructing cut-stone sidewalks and a semi-circular, stone-lined gravel 

drive between office and garage. Except for the flagpole, most improvements remain, and

contribute well to the site's aesthetics and overall historic character. 

A 1995 Forest Service report sent to the Wyoming State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) 

stated that the compound's bunkhouse and garage were not eligible to the National Register 

because others exist on the forest. The other argument against eligibility was that because the site 

is in-town and not on forest lands proper, the site lacked "historic feeling." At that time, the 

SHPO concurred. Further detailed historic research and analysis, however, revealed valuable 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 22
contextual connections that must be considered. Urban Forest Service administrative sites

increased in the 1920s and 1930s as the finance, education, and service infrastructures of small,

isolated Wyoming towns like Big Piney improved. Rangers and their families needed banks to 

manage their finances, schools for their children, and stores for their personal and work needs.

Therefore, an urban Forest Service site, if overall integrity remains intact, can retain as much 

"historic feeling" as an on-forest site. Furthermore, in-town CCC-era administrative sites still in

use by this forest are rare, for many like the Cokeville and Pinedale district complexes have been 

sold to the private sector. Afton's is the only other in-town, multi-building CCC-era site still in 

use by the Forest Service. 

So while it is true that four other Plan 51s and 7 other Plan 23s do exist on Bridger-Teton

National Forest lands, the Big Piney administrative site at 440 Smith Street is the only in-town, 

CCC-era Bridger-Teton administrative site where the two plans exist together and complement

each other with such a high degree of overall site integrity. Additionally, the broader historic 

context of the CCC and increased urban administrative activity by the Forest Service during this

era must be considered. The Big Piney complex illustrates well this contextual association with

forest history and the management of public lands. 

Big Piney: 440 Smith Bunkhouse, Facility #BT-BP-2013 (1933) 

Overall, this structure rates high integrity. Location and setting all work well because it is a good

example of a former in-town ranger station that still serves the district well as housing and 

storage. Feeling and association also rate high because the building and its companion garage 

complement each other, both aesthetically and architecturally. Materials and workmanship, with 

the exception of workers not matching the original drop siding when half of the front porch was 

enclosed in 1959-1960, rate high as well. Most original windows, doors, and hardware remain

intact. Period of significance is 1933, with themes in architecture, conservation, and

politics/government. 

Big Piney: 440 Smith Garage, Facility #BT-BP-7014 (1933) 

Like its companion bunkhouse/office, the garage at 440 Smith Street, Big Piney, retains a high

degree of integrity in all aspects. Location, setting, feeling and association all work very well, for 

it complements the other structure nicely with regard to in-town Forest Service administrative

sites built during the New Deal. Materials and workmanship also rate high, because with the 

exception of one door and window reversed to fit to the narrow city lot, it is built to plan, and has 

retained all of its historic architectural features. Period of significance is 1933, with themes in

architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 23
DEADLINE RIDGE FIRE LOOKOUT 

Smithsonian #48-SU-1738 

It is recommended that Deadline Ridge Fire Lookout is not eligible to the National Register of 

Historic Places. Although associated with Bridger National Forest fire lookout network 

expansion during the later years of the New Deal--and that it has retained some architectural

features--it has since been converted to a radio repeater support structure. Another factor 

affecting historical association: the lookout was moved sometime before 1955 from an unknown

location. 

Deadline Ridge Lookout/Radio Repeater/Battery Shelter. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

Not much is known about Deadline Ridge Fire Lookout, except it used to be known as Castle Fire 

Lookout. No tabular records list land withdrawals, nor are there detailed building records. It is 

unknown as to whether the CCC was involved in its construction. It is also unknown as to how 

long it was staffed, but since all Bridger National Forest fire lookouts were abandoned by the 

early 1970s, it is safe to assume the lookout has not been used since that time. Currently, the 

structure houses solar batteries and other electronic apparatus for a metal, prefabricated radio 

repeater housing located immediately to the east. 

Deadline Ridge Lookout, Facility #BT-BP-4036 (1941) *non-contributing/not eligible 

Deadline Ridge Fire Lookout rates low to medium in most aspects of integrity. One affecting 

factor is the placement of a 10 x 10-foot metal prefabricated radio repeater shack immediately

adjacent to the east. The former fire lookout now serves as a solar panel and battery shelter for

the repeater. Electric poles and antennae are also attached to the building, which has been moved

from its original (unknown) location. Additionally, there are other fire lookouts of this type on 

the Bridger-Teton National Forest with higher historic integrity.

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 24
HOBACK GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-SU-1545 

It is recommended that Hoback Guard Station is eligible to the National Register of Historic 

Places as a contiguous district under Criteria A and C, with period of significance of 1935. 

Significant under themes of architecture, conservation and politics/government, it is a fine

example of a standardized, Forest Service field administrative compound designed and 

implemented during the New Deal and built by the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC). Three 

contributing buildings--office/dwelling, garage/workshop, and barn--associate well with each

other and the surrounding natural landscape. While the storage shed might be the oldest building, 

there are no records that confirm its age; guard station expansion proposals from the 1960s do not

even mention this shed. The gas house dates from the 1960s as one of the only buildings

constructed from the work center expansion proposal. Both the shed and gas house are

considered non-contributing/not eligible.

The Hoback Dwelling/Bunkhouse. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

There are very few written records on Hoback Guard Station. On November 11, 1922, 160 acres 

were approved for withdrawal, but this acreage was never formally withdrawn. Historic 

investment and depreciation records indicate the CCC constructed the office/dwelling, garage,

and two fly sheds in 1935 (one fly shed is the current barn, while the other was torn down). No 

records exist of the other two buildings, a small storage shed and a newer gas house. In 1947, 

Hoback District Ranger Gray Reynolds requested another 160-acre withdrawal to expand Hoback 

Guard Station, then considered "too small." Although Regional Forester Edward Cliff approved 

Reynolds' request, the land was never formally withdrawn. 

During the 1960s, the Teton National Forest harbored grand designs for a new "Hoback Work 

Center," one specifically designed to "upgrade the administration of the [Hoback Ranger] district 

and better serve the public and Forest user." This proposed ambitious expansion included the 

construction of a new water system, warehouse, trailer spaces, gas house, barn, office, and 

dwellings, along with a visitor information center. The proposal also called for upgraded fences, 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 25
improved roads, and a sewage system. For reasons unknown, however, this expansion never 

manifested. Instead, the Forest Service constructed (or moved?) the gas house, expanded the 

office into a larger bunkhouse, and improved the water system. The only material evidence of

these grandiose expansion plans are trailer space hookups near the entry, but they are not being 

used. The Forest Service currently uses Hoback Guard Station for seasonal housing, a worker 

tent camp, and general storage. 

Hoback Barn, Facility #BT-BP-2030 (1935)

The Hoback Guard Station Barn rates high in all integrity aspects. It associates well with the 

guard station's other CCC-era buildings and the surrounding natural landscape. Materials and 

workmanship are top-notch. In addition, with the exception of a wood floor, exterior door, and

electricity, this building has not been structurally or cosmetically altered over time. Period of 

significance is 1935, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Hoback Dwelling, Facility #BT-BP-4027 (1935) 

The Hoback Guard Station Office/Dwelling rates medium in the materials and workmanship 

categories, mostly due to room modifications for more space. However, it rates high in feeling 

and association due to matching up well with the compound's other historic buildings, and with 

the exception of the front porch enclosure, it is virtually unchanged since construction. And

although modified, it is somewhat unique in that it is also one of only two Plan 7 floor plans that 

still exist on the Bridger-Teton. Period of significance is 1935, with themes in architecture,

conservation, and politics/government. 

Hoback Garage/Workshop, Facility #BT-BP-7028 (1935) 

Much like its companion barn located directly to the west, the Hoback Guard Station 

Garage/Workshop rates high in all aspects. It contributes well to the guard station's historic

character. Not only is it built exactly to plan, other than utilitarian retrofits like electricity and 

plumbing, it has never been structurally or cosmetically altered. As such, it is one of the forest's

better examples of this popular floor plan. Period of significance is 1935, with themes in 

architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Hoback Storage Shed, Facility # N/A (c.1947) *non-contributing/not eligible 

The Hoback Guard Station Storage Shed rates low to medium in all categories. The construction 

date is unknown, for it was built sometime after the 1935 buildings and does not add to the guard 

station's historic architectural qualities. Consequently, it is a non-contributing resource. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 26
MONUMENT RIDGE FIRE LOOKOUT 

Smithsonian #48-SU-1544

It is recommended that the Monument Ridge Fire Lookout is eligible to the National Register of

Historic Places under Criteria A and C, with a period of significance of 1941. Significant under

the themes of architecture, conservation, and politics/government, it is a fine example of preWWII fire lookout vernacular constructed by the Civilian Conservation Corps. It is also 

associated with the Forest Service’s quest for expanded fire reconnaissance and suppression 

during this era. Monument Ridge is also unique in that it is the only remaining lookout on the 

forest that appears to have been constructed through precut methods, and the only one constructed 

with logs. 

Monument Ridge Fire Lookout. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

Not much is known about Monument Ridge Lookout, for few written records have been found. 

Although relatively low in elevation (compared to others on the forest) for a fire lookout site, the 

Forest Service picked the site back in the 1930s because they thought it was the best location to

gain full view of the entire Hoback Ranger District, plus a road could easily be built to Monument

Ridge’s summit. As such, Monument Ridge lookout is one of only two lookouts on the forest 

(the other is Deadline Ridge) that does not require a long hike or horseback ride to visit. 

Monument Ridge Fire Lookout, Facility # BT-BP-4035 (1941)

Monument Ridge Lookout rates high in all integrity aspects. It has retained its historic integrity 

nicely over the last six decades, and exhibits stellar workmanship and materials in its precut log 

construction. It associates well with the surrounding environment: the setting is spectacular, with 

a 360-degree view of the Wyoming, Gros Ventre, and Wind River ranges. Although some 

windows are boarded up, this does not alter the building's integrity, as this is easily reversible. 

Period of significance is 1941, with themes in architecture, conservation, and

politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 27
 PROSPECT PEAK FIRE LOOKOUT

Smithsonian #48-SU-1770 

Big Piney District Ranger Greg Clark inspects Prospect Peak Lookout. Jim Bailey/USFS 

Photo 

It is recommended that Prospect Peak Fire Lookout is eligible to the National Register under 

Criteria A and C, with a period of significance of 1941. Significant under the themes of 

architecture, conservation, and politics/government, the lookout is associated with the Bridger 

National Forest’s early attempts at devising a network of strategically placed lookout towers for

fire reporting and suppression purposes. While most of these small lookout towers have 

collapsed, transformed into radio repeaters, been torched to prevent squatters, or are in very poor 

condition due to neglect, exposure, or vandalism, Prospect Peak is one of the most intact. It has 

retained high levels of historic and architectural integrity over the past 60 years, and is one of the

best representatives of its particular floor plan on the forest. 

Although records indicate a couple of wood frame lookouts were built on the Bridger and Teton 

National Forests in the 1930s, the early 1940s witnessed the feverish construction of fire lookouts 

on both forests. Available records list at least 8 lookouts constructed in 1941 alone, many of

which still stand today. Among these lookouts is Prospect Peak. Derived from the Region One 

Plan L-4 floor plan, Region Four Architect George L. Nichols developed what is known as the 

Region 4 Plan 80 Lookout House, a small, square, wood-frame, hipped roof structure whose 

construction materials were easy to pack to remote locations. This worked well for isolated

Bridger and Teton fire lookouts accessible only via long hike or horseback. 

Yet other than year constructed and costs, not many records exist in Forest Service files on 

Prospect Peak (a.k.a. Prospect Hill). It is unknown precisely how long it was staffed, but forestwide trends point to the possibility that it was abandoned sometime in the late 1960s or early

1970s as airplane patrols became more commonplace.

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 28
Prospect Peak Fire Lookout, Facility #BT-BP-4038 (1941) 

Prospect Peak Fire Lookout rates high in all integrity aspects. Nearly unchanged over the last 60

years (and somewhat worn due to exposure), it has nonetheless retained most of its unique 

architectural features, including some of its original paint scheme. Workmanship and materials

are excellent. The lookout associates well with the surrounding natural landscape, and is one of 

the forest’s best representatives of its specific floor plan and style. Period of significance is 1941,

with themes in architecture and conservation. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 29
SHERMAN GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-SU-1769 

It is recommended that Sherman Guard Station is eligible to the National Register of Historic 

Places as a district under Criteria A and C, with periods of significance of c1929 and 1931-34. 

Significant under the themes of architecture, conservation, and politics/government, Sherman 

Guard Station is associated with early Forest Service management of timber and rangelands. 

Rangers working out of Sherman monitored extensive timber sale and grazing activities around 

Horse and North Cottonwood Creeks and other adjoining drainages during the 1920s and 1930s.

Sherman Guard Station also represents an architectural shift from traditional Forest Service

vernacular to the era of standardized building plans. While a couple buildings have been

removed, Sherman now consists of six buildings, all of which are historic and contribute to the 

district's historic character: an office, barn, generator shed, bunkhouse, outhouse, and fruit cellar. 

Although not threatened, Sherman Guard Station was the staging point for the 2001

Mule Fire. The fruit cellar is located left of the outhouse. Greg Clark/USFS Photo 

Sherman Ranger/Guard Station was a yearlong headquarters for the Teton Division of the

Yellowstone Forest Reserve from 1905 until the Wyoming National Forest’s creation on July 1, 

1908. From 1912 to 1930 Sherman was the yearlong headquarters for the Sherman Ranger 

District. During this time, the two buildings that were eventually removed were built: a shop in 

1926 and a large four-room log dwelling in 1929. (In 1940, the Forest Service sold and moved

the dwelling to Big Piney; it is unknown when they removed the shop). From 1930 to 1937, 

Sherman was used as a summer headquarters, until the 1937 absorption of the smaller Sherman

Ranger District by the larger Big Piney Ranger District. It was during this time that three of the

older historic buildings that still stand were built, the fruit cellar c.1929, the barn in 1931, and the 

generator shed one year later. 

In 1933 and 1934, Civilian Conservation Corps workers constructed the other three historic 

buildings, the office, the garage/shop (modified into a bunkhouse in the late 1970s), and the 

outhouse, from standard plans developed by Regional Architect George L. Nichols. In 1934, the

Regional Office devised a landscaping plan, with walkways, flowering bushes, gates, and 

fencing; other than the fences, few of these improvements remain. Sherman is still used by the 

Big Piney Ranger District as a seasonal work center. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 30
Sherman Barn, Facility # BT-BP-8017 (1931)

The Sherman Guard Station Barn rates high in all integrity aspects. As a good example of preCCC era Forest Service vernacular architecture, workmanship and materials are very good. Other 

than a metal roof, has not been significantly altered inside or out since built. Period of 

significance is 1931, with themes in architecture and conservation. 

Sherman Bunkhouse, Facility #BT-BP-5016 (1934) 

The Sherman Bunkhouse rates medium to high in all aspects of integrity. Although it lacks 

distinction due to a rear shed roof addition, the bunkhouse retains several character-defining

features, including the siding, windows, and exposed rafter tails. Attempts were made to blend in 

any alterations as seamlessly as possible as seen in the use of Shevlin siding. This contributes to

the historical associations and overall architectural character of the district. Period of significance

is 1934, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Sherman Dwelling, Facility # BT-BP-4015 (1933)

Despite a retrofitted bathroom enclosure to the front porch, the office at Sherman Guard Station 

rates medium to high in all integrity aspects. In location and setting, it associates well with the

surrounding natural environment and the other buildings. Despite the front porch being half

enclosed, the rear elevation still suggests a strong Classical Revival influence. Workmanship and 

materials on the alterations are very sympathetic. Period of significance is 1933, with themes in

architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Sherman Fruit Cellar, No facility # (c.1929)

Although there is no written record of the Sherman Fruit Cellar, it nonetheless rates high in all 

aspects of integrity. It is a good example of rustic, pre-CCC Forest Service architectural 

vernacular, a log and earthen structure seemingly designed for a specific use: to keep perishable

provisions cool. Period of significance is c.1929, with themes in architecture and conservation. 

Sherman Outhouse, Facility #BT-BP-1018 (1934)

The Sherman Guard Station outhouse rates high in all aspects of integrity. It is a fine example of

a CCC-era latrine common to most rural guard and ranger stations, and associates well with the

guard station's other historic buildings. The outhouse has also retained many of its characterdefining features, such as the original wood bench, seat, and lid. There is the possibility that it

was moved to Sherman from elsewhere, but this has not been ascertained. Period of significance

is 1934, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Sherman Generator Shed, Facility # BT-BP-2019 (1932)

Like the barn, Sherman Guard Station’s Generator Shed rates high in all aspects of integrity. It is 

another fine example of pre-CCC Forest Service administrative vernacular. Workmanship and 

materials rate high, and with the exception of electricity, there are no alterations. The log 

structure associates well with the surrounding district. Period of significance is 1932, with 

themes in architecture and conservation. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 31
WYOMING PEAK FIRE LOOKOUT 

Smithsonian #48-LN-3029 

The skeletal remains of Wyoming Peak Fire Lookout, Wyoming’s highest lookout. 

Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

It is recommended that Wyoming Peak Fire Lookout is not eligible to the National Register of

Historic Places. Although it is one of the first standard plan fire lookouts constructed in the 

Wyoming/Bridger National Forest, it is such advanced stages of structural decay that many 

defining architectural features no longer exist. There are other fire lookout cabins on the BridgerTeton National Forest that are not only in much better condition, but are better representatives of 

this particular floor plan. 

There is a long history of “lookouts” atop 11,383-foot Wyoming Peak, the highest point in the 

Wyoming Range. Former Big Piney District Ranger Ed Cazier frequently referred to stone

observation “towers” and tent structures used to shelter hardy fire lookouts. Before the current

lookout cabin, the Wyoming Peak lookout had to live in a small canvas tent and haul his water 

five miles up a steep trail from the closest spring. Yet it is understandable why Wyoming Peak 

was chosen, for the panorama sweeps 360 degrees into every area of the Bridger National

Forest’s west section. 

To provide the lookout with a little more protection from lightning and the elements, in the early 

1930s the Forest Service decided to build what Regional Architect George L. Nichols called a 

Plan 80 Lookout Cabin. Wyoming Peak lookout served its purpose for 23 years, but was 

abandoned in 1957 as the agency relied more on air patrols for fire detection.

Wyoming Peak Lookout, Facility #BT-BP-4037 (1934) *non-contributing/not eligible 

As Wyoming’s highest fire lookout, Wyoming Peak rates high in location, feeling, and

association aspects. Decades of high altitude alpine exposure and neglect, however, have taken 

their toll on this structure. Because it has lost so many of its architectural features and structural 

integrity it is not a good representative of its particular floor plan. Other cabins at Deadman 

Mountain, Monument Ridge, and Prospect Peak illustrate better this building style. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 32
GREYS RIVER RANGER DISTRICT D-3 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 33
AFTON COMPLEX 

Smithsonian #48-LN-3886 

The Afton House today. Note the sun porch enclosure on 

the left, a popular retrofit on the Plan 1. Jim Bailey/USFS 

Photo 

The Afton Complex, 1937. USFS Photo 

It is recommended that the Afton Complex is eligible to the National Register of Historic Places

as a contiguous district under Criteria A and C, with period of significance of 1933-1942 and

1952-1953. Significant under the themes of architecture, conservation, and politics/government, 

it is a fine example of a standardized, Forest Service in-town administrative compound designed, 

developed and implemented during the New Deal and built by the Civilian Conservation Corps 

(CCC). It is also unique in that it is the only remaining intact, in-town, New Deal era multistructure compound of its kind still in administrative use by the Bridger-Teton National Forest.

The town of Afton was the supervisor's headquarters for the old Wyoming National Forest from

1908 until the 1923 consolidation of the Wyoming and Bridger National Forests. The 

supervisor's office then moved to Kemmerer, a more centralized, less isolated locale. Afton

continued to serve as the yearlong headquarters for the Afton Ranger District from 1907 until the 

1972 consolidation of the Bedford-Thayne and Afton districts into the present Greys River

district. 

Prior to 1933, the District Ranger rented a dwelling and house. The current compound's 

development began in 1933 with the construction of a dwelling and office/storeroom with 

Emergency Conservation Fund (ECF) money and CCC labor on donated land. On February 6, 

1934 the Forest Service purchased the entire front half-acre of the site from the city of Afton for

$1. With more space, a garage and barn were built in 1934 with Forest Service funds and CCC 

labor. On March 6, 1937, the Forest Service purchased the rear section of land (.019-acre) from 

one Samuel Roberts for $250. This parcel contains the warehouse, built sometime between 1939-

1942. Citing the need by the District Ranger in 1948 for safer flammables storage, the gas house 

was built in 1953 after numerous appropriations delays. One non-contributing element, a small 

storage shed adjacent to the gas house, was built sometime after 1955. 

All contributing buildings are standard Region 4 plans developed by Regional Architect George

L. Nichols, and were painted Color Scheme 1 (white with Nile green trim and roof), one 

designated as appropriate for in-town administrative sites. In 1935, the Regional Office 

developed a landscape plan, implemented one year later. This included stone walks, juniper and 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 34
conifer trees, flower bushes, lath fencing, and the removal of overgrown cottonwood trees; much 

of this original landscaping remains. In 1964, the barn was moved to a new site two miles south 

of town, then sometime shortly thereafter the gas house was moved about 75 feet to the east as 

the east side right-of-way easement closed and the west side was opened. Despite this and other 

building/site modifications, the overall site retains a high degree of integrity. It is recommended 

that district boundaries follow the current property/fence line. The site is still used by the Greys 

River district for utilitarian and housing purposes. 

Afton Bunkhouse, Facility # BT-GR-5020 (1933) 

The Afton Bunkhouse retains a high degree of location, design, setting, and association. 

Materials and workmanship, however, rate medium because of utilitarian building modifications 

over time, e.g., the aluminum single hung windows that replaced the original wood double hung 

windows, the T1-11 vertical siding on the back porch enclosure that does not match the building's

shiplap siding, the metal roof, and the aluminum front storm door. Despite these modifications,

the bunkhouse contributes to the site's overall significance, and associates well with the other 

historic buildings. Period of significance is 1933-1942, with themes in architecture, conservation, 

and politics/government. 

Afton Garage, Facility #BT-GR-7019 (1934) 

As the third CCC-built building in the Afton Complex, the garage rates high in every category of

integrity. It is built almost exactly to plan, and with the exception of a metal roof upgrade, the 

exterior has not been altered over time. In an aesthetic sense, it fits well as part of the complex's 

original site plan in every way, and is a model example of a structure that has retained high 

historic integrity over seven decades. Period of significance is 1933-1942, with themes in

architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Afton House, Facility #BT-GR-2018 (1933) 

Because of its continuing role as an integral part of the complex's master plan, the Afton Complex 

ranger dwelling rates high in the location, design, setting, workmanship, feeling and association 

categories. Workmanship on room additions and other structural modifications were skillfully

done, blending almost seamlessly with the original building; these room additions faithfully 

follow standard Region 4 designs. Materials used for window and other minor upgrades, 

however, do not match the original materials. Overall, the structure rates medium to high in 

overall integrity. Period of significance is 1933-1942, with themes in architecture, conservation, 

and politics/government. 

Afton Shed/Fire Cache, Facility #BT-GR-9022 (1952-53) 

Not part of the original site plan – and the last historic structure built on the complex – the gas 

house retains a high degree of integrity in all aspects despite minor alterations. Set at a 90-degree 

angle north of the two-car garage, its diminutive size and high workmanship complements the 

other larger historic buildings, and associates well with the entire site. Although constructed after

the site's general period of significance (1933-1942), it nonetheless relates to the documented

significance of the property because it follows New Deal-era standardized architecture. Period of 

significance is 1953, with themes in architecture and conservation. 

Afton Warehouse, Facility #BT-GR-7021 (1940)

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 35
Location, feeling and setting for this building rate high because they are unchanged since this intown administrative site was developed. It also rates high in design because it is a good example 

of a Plan 35 warehouse shortened to fit a narrow city lot, and that it is the only Plan 35 on the 

forest. However, it rates medium at best for materials and workmanship, due to unsympathetic 

construction materials and methods: the use of T1-11 siding on the far west bay enclosure and a 

flush steel exterior door. Period of significance is 1933-1942, with themes in architecture, 

conservation, and politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 36
CABIN CREEK LOOKOUT 

Smithsonian #48-LN-3887

It is recommended that Cabin Creek Fire Lookout is eligible to the National Register of Historic

Places under Criteria A and C, with a period of significance of 1941. Significant under themes 

of architecture, conservation and politics/government, it is associated with the management of

public lands and the expansion of the Bridger National Forest's fire lookout network in the late 

1930s and early 1940s. It was constructed by the Civilian Conservation Corp and, although in

very poor structural condition due to neglect, exposure, and vandalism, it has retained many of its 

character-defining architectural features. Furthermore, although it is currently not the best 

representative of its specific floor plan on the forest (identical cabins at Prospect Peak and 

Deadman Mountain are in better condition) the Greys River Ranger District is committed to its 

accurate restoration for possible future restaffing purposes. 

Cabin Creek Lookout. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

Little is known about Cabin Creek Fire Lookout. No tabular records list land withdrawals, nor 

are there detailed building records. It is also unknown as to how long it was staffed, but since all 

B-T fire lookouts were abandoned by the early 1970s – and considering the building's advanced

level of structural decay, along with tree growth that has obscured views to the west and north – it

is safe to assume the lookout has not been used since that time. 

Cabin Creek Fire Lookout, Facility #BT-GR-4038 (1941) 

Cabin Creek Lookout rates high in all aspects of integrity. Although in poor structural condition,

historic integrity is high, for it has retained many character-defining architectural features. It is

also associated with the forest's quest during the 1930s and 1940s to improve their fire detection 

network via a series of mountaintop lookout cabins developed from standard plans. Period of

significance is 1941, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 37
CAZIER GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-LN-3024 

It is recommended that Cazier (Kuh-ZEER) Guard Station is eligible to the National Register of 

November 13, 1906, 127 acres were withdrawn for an administrative site that could provide a 

it was believed the cabin was rotting and unsafe, in 1933 the forest service sold it to one J.D.

ith the exception of the name change, and the office's near-seamless expansion into a

Cazier Bunkhouse. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

Historic Places as a contiguous district under Criteria A and C, with periods of significance of 

1933 and 1942. It is historically significant in the early administration of the Wyoming/Bridger 

National Forest under the themes of architecture, conservation and politics/government. Cazier 

Guard Station is a fine example of a standardized Forest Service administrative compound

designed, developed, and constructed during the New Deal, and associates well with the forest's

historic context. 

On

centralized patrol headquarters for the upper Greys River drainage. Originally named Corral 

Creek (for a small creek that flows into the nearby Greys River), in 1912 the Forest Service 

constructed the original Guard Station, a 10' x 12' one-room log cabin. This cabin was located

about 1/4 mile north of the present guard station on the east side of Greys River road. Various 

Wyoming National Forest ranger districts used this cabin to patrol remote grazing allotments and 

logging operations. 

As

Gardner for $5.00. The same year, the Forest Service selected the current site for a new guard 

station. The original site plan depicts two buildings, the office and outhouse, which were 

constructed in 1933 by the CCC. Nine years later, in 1942, the garage was constructed. It is

unknown whether the CCC built this structure. 

W

bunkhouse, the site has not changed over time. In 1984, Corral Creek was renamed to honor

Afton native and Big Piney District Ranger Sam Cazier, the first ranger on the old Wyoming 

National Forest to use an automobile for patrol. Cazier also constructed part of the three-pole

wood timber fence that still circles the guard station. It is recommended that district boundaries 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 38
should follow the property's immediate fence line. The Greys River Ranger District still uses the 

guard station for field worker housing and general storage. 

Cazier Bunkhouse, Facility #BT-GR-4015 (1933) 

The Cazier Office/Bunkhouse rates medium in all categories of integrity. Although it sits in its 

original spot as depicted in a mid-1930s site plan, and associates well with the surrounding 

natural and built environment, it has been compromised by a porch enclosure designed to provide

more interior living space, a full bathroom retrofit, and a metal roof. Yet the alterations and 

modifications were skillfully done, using matching materials, and are not extensive enough to 

make it ineligible. Period of significance is 1933, with themes in architecture, conservation, and

politics/government. 

Cazier Garage, Facility #BT-GR-7016 (1942)

Although the Cazier Garage was not included in the original site plan, it still rates high in all 

categories of integrity. Constructed nine years after the other two buildings, workers were careful 

to closely match the style and materials used for the office and outhouse. Thus, it fits in well with 

the site's overall levels of feeling and association, both in an architectural and environmental

sense. It also has retained high historic integrity over the last sixty years. Period of significance

is 1942, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Cazier Outhouse, Facility #BT-GR-1017 (1933) 

Due to extensive door modifications and reinforcements that do match well with the rest of the 

building or site, this built-to-plan outhouse rates medium in all categories. It sits directly behind 

the office/bunkhouse, and is compatible with the guard station's overall architectural and 

landscape character. Period of significance is 1933, with themes in architecture, conservation, 

and politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 39
DEADMAN MOUNTAIN FIRE LOOKOUT 

Smithsonian #48-LN-2865 

Deadman Fire Lookout. Bill Shields/USFS Photo 

It is recommended that Deadman Fire Lookout is eligible to the National Register of Historic

Places under Criteria A and C, with a period of significance of 1941. Significant under the 

themes of architecture, conservation and politics/government, it is associated with the expansion 

of the Bridger National Forest fire lookout network during the late 1930s and early 1940s.

Although the lookout has been compromised over time, mostly due to neglect, exposure, and

some vandalism, it has retained many of its character-defining architectural features. Thus, of the

forest's six existing Plan 80 lookout cabins, Deadman rates among the poorest in structural 

integrity, yet among the highest in historic integrity. It was also constructed by the Civilian 

Conservation Corps. 

Not much is known about Deadman Fire Lookout, except it used to be known as Greyfall Fire 

Lookout. No tabular records list land withdrawals, nor are there detailed building records. It is 

also unknown as to how long it was staffed, but since all Bridger National Forest fire lookouts

were abandoned by the early 1970s, it is safe to assume the lookout has not been used since that 

time. There are no plans for restoration and renovation, mostly due to its very remote location

that literally straddles a 10,000-foot knife ridge. The topography is so narrow and steep on all

sides that helicopters cannot safely land to deliver personnel and equipment. The lookout almost 

burned in 2000 when a fire raced up and over the west ridge, passing right over the structure. 

Deadman Fire Lookout, Facility #BT-GR-4309 (1941) 

Deadman Fire Lookout rates high in all aspects of integrity. The lookout's association with fire 

prevention, a nationally significant development in early forest conservation, is supplemented by

the structure's architectural qualities that are unique to fire lookouts. Although in poor structural 

condition, Deadman has nonetheless retained many of its character defining architectural features. 

Feeling and association also rate high because of its setting atop Deadman Mountain, a site

unchanged since the building's construction. Period of significance is 1941, with themes in 

architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 40
DEER CREEK GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-LN-3020 

It is recommended that the two h k Guard Station are individually 

eligible to the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A and C, with a period of

cuments have been found

t deta l the site's history. No records were located that detail any site withdrawals before 1956,

ys River CCC camp, located a few miles south, constructed the 

toric office, the original latrine, associated corrals and fences, and landscaped the grounds. It 

The Deer Creek Dwelling rates medium to high in all aspects of integrity. It is a fine example of

t has retained historic integrity over seven 

Deer Creek Dwelling. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

istoric buildings at Deer Cree

significance of 1933. Significant under the themes of architecture, conservation and

politics/government, Deer Creek is representative of Forest Service field offices designed during 

the New Deal and constructed by the CCC. The guard station consists of three buildings, two

historic, and one modern. The two contributing/eligible buildings are the dwelling and storage 

shed, while the third is a modern latrine, a non-contributing resource. 

 

Other than a site improvement plan from 1934, no land or historic do

tha i

when 80 adjoining acres were withdrawn for pasturage. The primary reason the Forest Service

chose Deer Creek were the extensive meadows suitable for stock pasture in the middle of the 

Bridger's Bedford Ranger District In 1930, the Forest Service enclosed part of this small pasture 

for use as a temporary stop-over for the Bedford District Ranger and guard for the Bridger 

National Forest, then maintained a tent camp as rangers checked nearby grazing allotments and

monitored timber operations. 

In 1933, workers from the Gre

his

is unknown when the shed was moved to the site, for it is not listed on the station's 1934 

improvement plan. The Greys River Ranger District still uses the guard station as a bunkhouse 

for summer field workers and as a rental cabin for winter recreationists. 

Deer Creek Dwelling, Facility #BT-GR-4012 (1933)

a built-to-plan Region Four Plan 5 two-room office tha

decades. With the exception of the collapsed brick chimney, all architectural features that define 

a New Deal Forest Service administrative structure remain intact. Most exterior modifications 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 41
and alterations have been performed sympathetically in association with the building's historic 

character. Period of significance is 1933, with themes in architecture, conservation, and

politics/government. 

Deer Creek Shed, Facility #BT-GR-9013 (1935) 

The small shed at Deer Creek Guard Station rates medium to high in all integrity aspects. It is

eligible as a building associated directly with the Deer Creek Dwelling, the primary resource. 

Although it has minor exterior alterations, most are sympathetic and the building contributes to

the site's historic character. A question exists as to whether it was built on-site or moved from 

elsewhere, but this is not enough to negatively affect overall integrity. Period of significance is 

1933, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 42
MCCAIN GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-LN-2866 

The McCain Bunkhouse. Note the eave brackets. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

It is recommended that McCain Guard Station is not eligible to the National Register. It does not 

strongly demonstrate an important association with the historic themes, including those of 

conservation and architecture, identified with Forest Service administrative facilities. Compared 

to other guard stations built before the New Deal, it has few features that define the character of

pre-New Deal Forest Service architecture. Other sites on the forest like Bryan Flat and Elk Creek

Guard Stations, along with the Rosencrans Cabin National Historic District, better illustrate 

Forest Service administrative compounds and buildings of this time, and are more strongly

associated with the Forest Service administration of public lands. 

Not much is known about McCain Guard Station, or whether any buildings existed before the

present building’s construction. Named after former Teton National Forest supervisor Arthur C. 

McCain (1873-1956), the guard station is not in its original location. Because the well dried up at 

the original McCain Guard Station site, located a half-mile southeast, the Forest Service in 1978 

and 1979 moved the bunkhouse near a year-round active spring. Over the next ten to fifteen

years, two non-historic structures were added: a metal storage shed and a replacement outhouse. 

The district still uses it as a field bunkhouse and as a winter recreation rental cabin. 

McCain Bunkhouse, Facility #BT-GR-4006 (1932) *non-contributing/not eligible

Because it is not a good representative of pre-New Deal Forest Service architecture – and the fact

that it was moved in the late 1970s from its original site – the McCain Guard Station Bunkhouse 

rates low to medium in all aspects of integrity. Other Bridger and Teton National Forest guard 

and ranger stations built in the 1910s and 1920s better represent the era of Forest Service 

vernacular architecture that preceded standard building plans. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 43
MEADOWS GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-LN-3021 

Meadows Bunkhouse, the only R4 Plan 6 on the forest. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

It is recommended that Meadows Guard Station is eligible to the National Register of Historic 

Places as a district under criteria A and C, with period of significance of 1933-1934 and 1941. 

Significant under themes of architecture, conservation, and politics/government, it is a fine 

example of a Forest Service field administrative site designed and constructed during the New 

Deal. Contributing elements include a bunkhouse, a dwelling, and a barn/garage. While the

dwelling and barn/garage were built on-site, the smaller bunkhouse was moved to Meadows from 

the former Greys River Forks Guard Station in the 1960s. A latrine built in the 1990s is 

considered non-contributing/not eligible. 

Meadows Guard Station history goes back to 1912, when a small, one-room cabin with a dirt roof

was built about 200 yards southeast of the present guard station. In 1924, the cabin was moved to 

the site of the present barn and reconstructed as a larger building. Rangers from the Bedford 

Ranger District of the Wyoming/Bridger National Forest used Meadows as a way station while

checking grazing and timber allotments. In the early 1930s, the Regional Office decided to 

expand Meadows Guard Station, and developed a site/landscape plan. In 1933, CCC workers

constructed the office (now the dwelling) from a standard plan developed by Region Four

Architect George L. Nichols (in 1934 the CCC also constructed the small building at Greys River 

Forks Guard Station that was eventually moved to Meadows). 

In 1941, the CCC tore down the old log cabin and built the barn/garage, which appears to be 

follow a modified Two Car Garage/Storeroom floor plan (the barn/garage is not on the original

site development plan). Meadows remained mostly unchanged until the 1960s, when the Forest

Service closed Greys River Forks Guard Station (located 20 miles north at the confluence of the 

Little Greys and Greys River) and moved its only building to Meadows. Although it is of a

standard plan, this building is somewhat rare: few Plan 6s were constructed in the region, and it is 

the only Plan 6 on the forest. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 44
With the exception of a few utilitarian modifications--and the new outhouse--the site remains 

unchanged from the 1960s. The Greys River Ranger District, in conjunction with the U.S. Fish 

and Wildlife Service, still uses Meadows Guard Station as a work center. Its centralized location 

also serves as a heliport support site for southern zone aerial fire operations. 

Meadows Barn, Facility #BT-GR-8043 (1941)

The Meadows Guard Station barn/garage rates high in all integrity aspects. A model of stellar

workmanship, it is a highly intact building that associates very nicely with the surrounding 

environment and the other guard station buildings. Another factor is its uniqueness: there are no 

other Forest Service administrative barns like it on the forest. Period of significance is 1941, with

themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Meadows Bunkhouse, Facility #BT-GR-5009 (1934) 

Although moved, the bunkhouse at Meadows Guard Station bunkhouse rates high in all integrity

aspects. It is considered a contributing resource because it relates directly to the site's

significance. Like the other buildings, it was constructed by the CCC to support Forest Service 

administration of public lands and is representative of Forest Service architecture from that

period. The bunkhouse is also rare: few Plan 6s were constructed in the Intermountain region and

it is the only one of its kind on the Bridger-Teton. Other than a flue/cricket for the wood stove

(and a metal roof for the heavy snow loads) it is in near original condition. Period of significance 

is 1934, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Meadows Dwelling, Facility #BT-GR-4008 (1933)

Although three other Region Four Plan 5 floor plans exist on the forest, the Meadows Guard

Station version is the least altered with the highest historical integrity. Because it has not been 

significantly modified over time, and is in its original location, it also rates high in aspects of 

feeling, setting and association. It blends in almost seamlessly with the surrounding natural and 

built landscape. Period of significance is 1933, with themes in architecture, conservation, and 

politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 45
OSMOND BARN 

Smithsonian #48-LN-3889 

The Osmond Barn provides shelter for district stock Cody (L) and Chester (R). Jim 

Bailey/USFS Photo 

It is recommended that the Osmond Barn is not eligible to the National Register of Historic

Places. Osmond Barn is one of three barns moved from towns to rural sites. Once known as the 

Afton Barn, it is now the only historic building on its new site south of Afton (there is a nonhistoric hay shed and metal corrals). Originally constructed as part of the Afton Complex (see 

48-LN-3886), it follows the standard Four-Horse Barn floor plan as designed by Regional 

Architect George L. Nichols. It sat next to the Afton Complex’s Gas House until the early 1960s

when, for sanitation and public health reasons, the City of Afton pressured the Forest Service to

remove barns and corral networks from their downtown administrative site. 

Once the Forest Service obtained a lot about 2.5 miles south of Afton, in 1964 they picked up the

barn, transported it to the new site, and set it upon a new foundation (the old site was cleaned up,

with all traces of the former barn site removed). The barn has been sitting out in rural Osmond 

ever since, and with the exception of a new roof and foundation, the exterior is otherwise 

unaltered. The interior, however, has been extensively altered for more efficient storage access.

The Greys River Ranger District still uses the barn for tack and feed storage, as well as horse 

shelter during inclement weather. 

Osmond Barn, Facility #BT-GR-8004 (1934) *non-contributing/not eligible 

Because it was moved from its original location in downtown Afton to rural Osmond, the 

Osmond Barn rates low in most integrity aspects, including feeling, association, and location. It

rates higher in workmanship and materials because the exterior is essentially unaltered. 

However, all stalls and grain bins in the interior have been removed, with both halves partitioned

off by an interior cross wall. Additionally, the Plan 11 Barn at Kendall Guard Station is a better 

representative of this floor plan and it is in its original location. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 46
PINEDALE RANGER DISTRICT D-7 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 47
DUTCH JOE GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-SU-1758 

Dutch Joe Dwelling, one of two R4 Plan 8s on the forest. Note the boxed eaves

and rake boards. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

It is recommended that Dutch Joe Guard Station is eligible to the National Register of Historic 

Places as a contiguous district under Criteria A and C, with periods of significance of 1933-35 

and 1944. Significant under the themes of architecture, conservation and politics/government, it 

is a fine example of a Forest Service administrative compound designed and constructed during 

the New Deal. Dutch Joe is also associated with the forest's early history, as it was one of the 

first sites withdrawn for administrative purposes on the forest's remote southeastern reaches. 

Named after Joseph Himmersback, a Dutch immigrant who came to this area in the late 1800s to

trap and raise livestock, Dutch Joe Guard Station history predates the forest's formal 1908 

creation. On December 4, 1906, the Secretary of Interior approved a 185-acre land withdrawal 

for administrative purposes. Four years later, in 1910, the new Dutch Joe Ranger Station was

established; it served as a yearlong headquarters for the Dutch Joe Ranger District of the 

Washakie National Forest until July 1, 1916, when the Washakie National Forest consolidated

with the Bridger National Forest. Upon the 1923 consolidation of the Bridger and Wyoming

National forests, Dutch Joe became a summer station for the Wind River District of the Wyoming

National Forest until 1925. The same year, the Wind River and Fremont Ranger Districts were 

combined, and until 1934 the site served as the summer headquarters for the assistant ranger of 

the Fremont Ranger District of the Wyoming National Forest. 

Historic pre-New Deal Forest Service photos of Dutch Joe Ranger Station (above) reveal various 

log structures used for housing, offices, and storage. From 1933 to 1935, Dutch Joe received a 

major overhaul courtesy of CCC and Emergency Conservation Fund (ECF) labor. Workers 

removed the old dilapidated log structures and replaced them with three new buildings designed 

by Regional Architect George L. Nichols, all contributing resources. One cabin was replaced

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 48
with a two-story, Plan 8 Colonial-Revival-style dwelling, a Plan 23 garage replaced a log storage

structure, and a Plan 14 fly shed was built. The CCC and ECF also improved the fence and corral 

network and constructed stone sidewalks and retaining walls. For the most part, Dutch Joe has

remained true to this era. With the exception of a historic hay/creosote shed constructed in 1944

(contributing) and a modern shower house (non-contributing)--and some utility upgrades--the site 

has changed little over time. 

Seasonal workers patrolling the forest's remote southeastern reaches use the Dutch Joe Guard

Station. It is also used as a base camp for southern Bridger Wilderness ranger patrols. 

Dutch Joe Dwelling, Facility #BT-PD-4031 (1933) 

One of only two Region 4 Plan 8 dwellings on the Bridger-Teton, the Dutch Joe Guard Station

Dwelling rates high in all aspects of historic integrity. It has minor modifications (e.g., vinyl 

kitchen floor, new screen doors and front porch supports) that do not detract from its historic 

character. The dwelling fits in well with the site's natural and built environment. Period of

significance is 1933, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Dutch Joe Garage, Facility #BT-PD-7032 (1933) 

The Dutch Joe Guard Station Garage rates high in all aspects of integrity. Built to (reversed) 

plan, the garage fits in well with the guard station's natural and built environment, and represents 

well the Forest Service's trend toward building modernization and standardization common

during the New Deal years, especially structures specifically designed to house the increasingly 

common form of ranger patrol: the automobile. That it has not been drastically altered or 

changed over time reinforces its high overall integrity. Period of significance is 1933, with 

themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Dutch Joe Gas House, Facility #BT-PD-0034 (1935) 

Constructed from the Region Four Plan 14 Fly Shed floor plan, Dutch Joe's Gas House rates high 

in all aspects of historic integrity. The only exception to this high rating is the replacement 

exterior door, which appears old but is unsympathetic to the rest of the building. Nonetheless, the 

gas house is representative of a standardized, New Deal-era storage building essential to guard 

station operations. Period of significance is 1935, with themes in architecture, conservation, and

politics/government. 

Dutch Joe Hay Barn, Facility #BT-PD-8033 (1944)

The Dutch Joe Hay/Creosote shed is the only building of its kind in administrative use by the

Bridger-Teton National Forest. Although a decade younger than the rest of Dutch Joe's 

contributing structures, it nonetheless rates high in historic integrity as a good example of local

vernacular architecture. Additionally, no alterations have been performed that would distract 

from its historical character. Period of significance is 1944, with architecture as primary theme. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 49
ELKHART PARK GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-SU-4361 

It is recommended that Elkhart Park Guard Station is not eligible to the National Register of

Historic Places. With the 1968 addition of a modern, A-frame Visitor Information Center (VIC) 

and the removal of assorted fences and corrals, the site no longer possess the defined

characteristics required to strongly represent the historic context of a CCC-era guard station. 

Although there are two historic buildings on-site, a garage built as a combination

bunkhouse/storage area and a willow-overgrown outhouse, both do not represent well their 

respective standard plans. There are other Region Four Plan 21 garages and Plan 70 outhouses on 

the Bridger-Teton that are much better examples of their respective building plans than the

Elkhart versions. 

In a letter dated March 5, 1937, Wyoming National Forest Supervisor James O. Stewart cited the 

need for an administrative site close to heavily used stock ranges and recreation areas within the

Fremont Ranger District and Bridger Primitive Area, established in 1931. Stewart asked for a 

formal withdrawal of 120 acres for the site, but this was not official until 1956. According to

Forest Service investment records, in 1938 the Civilian Conservation Corps constructed the 

combination bunkhouse/garage and outhouse from standard plans developed by Regional 

Architect George L. Nichols. Elkhart Park Guard Station remained unchanged until 1968, when 

the Forest Service constructed the modern VIC approximately 1/4 mile north of the older site. 

The bunkhouse/garage is currently used for storage, while the unused outhouse has been severely

compromised by unchecked vegetation growth. 

Elkhart Park Barn, Facility #BT-PD-5030 (1938) *non-contributing/not eligible 

Constructed specifically as an off-duty residence for horseback wilderness rangers patrolling Unit 

3 of the Fremont Ranger District, the Elkhart Park Garage/Bunkhouse rates low to medium in all 

Elkhart Park Barn, a modified R4 Plan 21. Jim Bailey/USFS photo 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 50
categories. Derived from the Region Four Plan 21 Two-Car Garage floor plan, it was constructed

with the rear storage room converted to a small bunkhouse. The garage/bunkhouse is not the best 

representative of this floor plan; other Plan 21s at Meadows Guard Station and in Afton better

represent this particular design and floor plan. 

Elkhart Park Outhouse, Facility # N/A (1938) *non-contributing/not eligible 

The Elkhart Park Outhouse is a good example of how decades of neglect can compromise a 

simple wood-frame building. Hidden within a thick stand of willows, this outhouse is not one of

the better examples of its building type on the forest. For this reason, the outhouse should be

considered non-contributing/not eligible.

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 51
KENDALL GUARD STATION

Smithsonian #48-SU-63 

ue to high levels of redevelopment over the past 80 years, the Kendall Guard Station site has

e Kendall site history predates the Forest Service. In the late 1860s, the site housed the 

cause of it central location, in 1904 Kendall was chosen as headquarters for the Teton Division 

Kendall Guard Station, the oldest building on site. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

D

lost some integrity. It is recommended, however, that the four historic buildings that remain are

eligible under Criteria C in the area of architecture. The shed and gashouse are two of few 

remaining buildings from the era preceding the New Deal and retain high integrity. The

bunkhouse and barn are fine examples of New Deal-era standardized Forest Service architecture.

Since the CCC constructed them, the bunkhouse and barn are also eligible under Criteria A in the

area of politics/government. Periods of significance for these buildings are 1924, 1929, and 

1933-34. 

Th

Brigham Young tie-hack camp; this huge camp supplied hand-hewn railroad ties for the Union 

Pacific railroad as it made its way across Wyoming Territory’s southern reaches. In the 1890s, 

Kendall Tie Camp, named after Rock Springs banker Augustine Kendall, was a major center of 

regional tie hacking activities. A multi-building complex that consisted of a warehouse, office, 

bunkhouses, store, and sawmill, Kendall Tie Camp supplied railroads and mines with lodgepole 

pines cut in satellite camps, hewn into ties at the main camp, and floated down the adjoining 

Green River to Kemmerer. The camp lasted until 1904, with remnants of this camp—and its 

cemetery—can be found southeast of the present guard station. 

Be

of the Yellowstone Forest Reserve. On December 4, 1906, 160 acres were withdrawn for an

administrative site. Historic photos show a log cabin that served as a dwelling and office. After 

the Bridger National Forest’s 1908 establishment, Kendall continued as a district headquarters 

until this office was moved to less-isolated Pinedale in 1909. Kendall continued to serve as 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 52
headquarters for the Kendall and Green River Ranger Districts of the Bridger/Wyoming National 

Forests. It is during this time (1920s) that the blacksmith shop and outhouse that still exist were 

built. 

From 1933 to 1936, Kendall Ranger Station received a makeover courtesy of the CCC. Older log 

e to its important role as a work center for the forest’s central regions, Kendall Guard Station

endall Barn, Facility #BT-PD-8014 (1934) 

t on Barn is a fine example of a CCC-era Forest

endall Gashouse, Facility #BT-PD-1018 (1924) 

e was constructed in 1924 from one of the 

endall Old Bunkhouse, Facility #BT-PD-4012 (1933) 

example of a CCC-era Forest Service 

Kendall Shed, Facility #BT-PD-2017 (1929)

g dings on the Bridger-Teton that reflect the 

architecture, with 1929 as the period of significance. 

structures were torn down, and in their places the CCC erected a house, garage, barn, and office, 

and landscaped the site with walkways and stone-lined drives. Nearby Pinedale’s growth during 

the postwar era, however, created an acute housing shortage. To address this problem, the Forest 

Service in 1952 lifted Kendall’s main house and garage and transported them to Pinedale, where 

they now sit at 332 N. Franklin Street. Thus, Kendall Guard Station is the only Bridger-Teton

National Forest administrative site where two generations of buildings, Progressive and New

Deal-eras, were torn down or moved as needs dictated. 

Du

continued to be modified over the next 30 years. A modern manufactured bunkhouse was erected

in the 1980s, along with a replacement generator shed. The old, pre-CCC outhouse received a 

major makeover and was converted to a gas house. Remnants of old building foundations still 

remain, as do some of the walkways and stone-lined drives. 

K

Much like the bunkhouse, the Kendall Guard S ati

Service administrative building that has retained high integrity over the last 70 years. Although 

the setting has been somewhat compromised by redevelopment of the site, the barn rates high in

all other aspects of integrity. It is the only Plan 11 Barn, a Region Four standard plan, on the 

Bridger-Teton in its original location and retains its use as an agricultural facility. It is significant 

under Criteria A and C with themes in architecture and conservation with 1934 as the period of

significance. 

K

The oldest building on the site, this former outhous

earliest known standard plans used in Region Four. Only a handful of these buildings are found 

throughout the region, and no others are known to exist on the Bridger-Teton. It also represents 

the historic Forest Service trend of moving and adapting buildings, especially outhouses, to new 

uses. It retains all of its character-defining features and is eligible under Criterion C in the area of

architecture, with 1924 as the period of significance. 

K

The Kendall Guard Station Bunkhouse is a representative

administrative building that has retained high integrity over seven decades. Although the setting 

has been compromised by redevelopment on the site, this former office rates high in all other

aspects of integrity. It is the best example of its specific floor plan (Region 4 Plan 51) still on the

forest. The old bunkhouse is significant under Criterion A and C, with themes in architecture and

politics/government and 1933 as the period of significance. 

The Kendall Shed is one of the few remainin buil

Forest Service's use of pioneer construction techniques. This unaltered log building is the second

oldest on the Kendall site, and demonstrates vernacular building traditions of the pre-CCC era. It 

retains all of its character-defining features and is eligible under Criterion C in the area of 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 53
PINEDALE BARN 

Smithsonian #48-SU-4362 

National Register of Historic 

Places. The barn has been g center and is situated

among newer buildi onally, Pinedale’s

barn is not the best exa cal barn at Goosewing Guard 

Station (in the Jackson Ra historic integrity, 

it still sits in its original loc

Constructed in 1934- the barn originally sat near the 

southeast corner of Wilson Street and did not produce reasons why

oved to a larger parcel in suburban 

Pinedale. Although speculation, the barn could have been relocated in a pattern similar to other 

western Wyoming Forest Service towns. In Afton and Big Piney, Forest Service barns were

shuffled away from town to rural locations in the mid-1960s over sanitation and public health

concerns. It is possible that Pinedale’s Barn might have been caught up in the public health issue. 

Currently, the barn sits at the rear of a modern work center about 1.5 miles north of town in a

modern subdivision. Newer mobile home pads sit at the entrance to the work center. The 

Pinedale Ranger District uses the barn for general tack and feed storage. 

Pinedale Barn, Facility #BT-PD-8010 (1934-35) *non-contributing/not eligible 

The Pinedale Barn is one of three barns on the Bridger-Teton moved from towns to rural sites. 

Over recent years, the area around the site has been significantly developed with suburban 

housing. These two factors, along with the presence of a modern shed and new trailer pads, result

in low integrity of setting, location, and feeling. And while the exterior is fairly intact, like the 

other two barns the interior has been extensively modified. The Plan 12 barn at Goosewing 

Guard Station is a more complete representative of this specific floor plan and it is in its original 

location. 

It is recommended that the Pinedale Barn is not eligible to the 

moved to a new site in a suburban work/housin

ngs; there is no historic site-to-building association. Additi

mple of this specific floor plan; another identi

nger District) has not only retained a higher degree of 

ation. 

1935 on a lot donated by the city of Pinedale, 

Lincoln Avenue. Research

nor an exact date when this Plan 12 barn was lifted and m

Pinedale Barn. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 54
PINEDALE: 243 WEST PINE 

It is recommended that the Pine, City of Pinedale, are eligible to 

the National Registe with a period of significance of

1933 and c.1935. itecture, conservation and 

esource because

elates to the documented significance of the dwelling.

nger District. 

e L. Nichols. Rangers

sed this building both as an office and a dwelling to administer the vast Fremont and Pinedale 

ent plan does not make mention of a garage, so speculation can go two directions: it 

Smithsonian #48-SU-4363 

 dwelling and garage at 243 W.

r of Historic ,

 Significant under the themes of arch

while modified, is also contributing/eligible r

243 West Pine Street today. Note the pine tree logo cutouts on the 

shutters. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

Places under Criteria A and C

politics/government, the dwelling is associated with the early Federal management of public 

lands, the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC), and standard Forest Service New Deal-era

architecture. It is also associated with Forest Service policy during this era of situating more 

year-round ranger dwellings within Wyoming’s towns, so rangers and their families could take 

better advantage of the rapidly improving service, education, and communication infrastructures.

The dwelling's companion garage,

it r

The site at 243 West Pine Street has a long history. Tired of living in isolation at Kendall Guard 

Station – and wishing to be closer to the services Pinedale offered – in 1909 ranger Zeph Jones 

purchased with government funds a 0.13-acre lot for $212, then secured it six years later through 

a Warranty Deed. On this site the Forest Service constructed a small dwelling, shed and 

outhouse; none of these buildings exist. From 1911 to 1933, the compound was used by various 

supervisors, assistant supervisors, and district rangers for the Bridger National Forest’s Fremont 

Ra

In 1933, the Forest Service razed the old dwelling and outhouse, and replaced them with a Plan 1 

Colonial Revival-style dwelling designed by Regional Architect Georg

u

Ranger Districts of the Bridger National Forest. In the late 1950s, the upstairs was remodeled

with a permanent stairwell at the rear to provide more sleeping space; most Plan 1 modifications 

of this nature place the new stairwell at the front of the house. In addition, the west side sun 

porch was fully enclosed to provide more living space, a common alteration for the versatile Plan 

1. Thus, the Plan 1 at 243 West Pine Street is the only one of its kind on the forest. 

Unlike the dwelling, the garage is a mystery. While there are virtually no records that describe its

history, it retains many features typical of New Deal-era standard plans. A 1935 site

improvem

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 55
was moved to Pinedale from o tation sites that closed or were

abandoned during the 1950s, like Boulder or Fremont Lakes, or it was built on site following a 

modified standard plan. The clos style to a standard plan is a Plan 

23 Single-Car Garage, so chances her moved from somewhere else 

or constructed on-site, then modified to fit the needs and limitations of the narrow city lot. The 

Pinedale Ranger District uses 243 West Pine for employee housing and storage. 

243 West Pine Garage, Facility #BT-PD-7003 (1935) 

The garage at 243 West Pine has medium integrity. The garage's history is unknown, and the

Region Four standard plan it resembles most is the Plan 23 Single-Car Garage. Although most 

likely moved from an undisclosed location, the garage must be considered eligible as a secondary 

resource, because it relates to the house's documented association with Forest Service

administration and New Deal programs. Although the doors and roof have been modified, the 

garage retains many architectural features typical of this style that match well with the house like 

exposed rafter tails, cove siding, etc. Period of significance is c.1935, with themes in architecture 

and conservation. 

243 West Pine House 1933)

ne of the many smaller guard s

est it comes in dimensions and

are good that a Plan 23 was eit

, Facility #BT-PD-2002 (

As one of the best representatives of the standard Plan 1 Colonial Revival style, the dwelling at

243 West Pine rates medium to high in all integrity aspects. Although modified, workmanship is 

stellar, plus it still retains many historic architectural features like the wood window shutters with

pine tree cutouts that define a Plan 1. Yet some modifications and materials have affected the 

integrity of design, such as the metal roof and the aluminum storm windows and doors. These 

materials, however, are common in this part of Wyoming with its long, cold winters. Period of

significance is 1933, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 56
PINEDALE: 332 NORTH FRANKLIN

Smithsonian #48-SU-4364 

It is recommended that the garage and dwelling at 332 North Franklin Street, City of Pinedale,

are not eligible to the National Register. Although the site has two buildings, it actually consists

of four buildings, three of which were conjoined to expand the dwelling. All were built during 

the New Deal and moved from elsewhere in the Pinedale Ranger District in the mid-1950s.

Because they have been lifted from their historic context then so extensively altered, the

buildings, a heavily modified Region 4 Plan 1 Dwelling and a Plan 23 Single-Car Garage, do not 

strongly demonstrate an important association with historic themes of Forest Service 

administrative sites. The two buildings also are poor representatives of their style. Other similar

buildings in Afton, Big Piney, Snider Basin, and Pinedale better represent their respective styles. 

A lack of adequate housing within a small postwar Wyoming town was the driving factor behind 

the establishment of the 332 North Franklin site. As the Forest Service expanded its operations 

and personnel during the postwar boom, it found itself unable to provide new employees with 

adequate housing in a town with very little private housing opportunities. To address this

deficiency, in the early 1950s forest officials secured a lot in what was then a new addition to 

Pinedale. Then, in 1952, the Plan 1 dwelling at Kendall Guard Station, its companion Plan 23 

Garage, and another Plan 23 Garage at Fremont Lakes Guard Station were uprooted, transported,

and then resituated on new foundations. The Forest Service spent nearly $10,000 to create the 

Franklin complex. 

Of the two buildings, the house was the most extensively altered. In order to provide an

additional bedroom and utility room, the Kendall garage was placed directly abutting the rear of

the main house then conjoined to provide this additional space. Another small building (from an 

unknown location) was then added directly behind the garage to serve as a coal room. The garage 

from Fremont Lakes was then placed at a right angle to the rear of the main building; 

improvement plans called for connector between house and garage, but this never materialized. 

Much like the main house, the garage has also been altered to the point that it no longer 

represents well its specific plan and style. The Pinedale Ranger District uses these buildings for 

employee housing and storage.

332 North Franklin Street, the former Kendall Guard Station Main Dwelling and 

Garage (1934-1952). Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 57
332 North Franklin Garag -contributing/not eligible 

Much like its companion house, the garage at 332 North Franklin Street rates low to medium in

all integrity aspects. Because it rical feeling or building-to-site 

historical associations. Numerous extensive alterations have also transformed this standard plan

single-car garage into something almost unrecognizable, at least from the street. There are many 

other similar garages on the Bridger-Teton that are not only much better representatives of this 

standard plan, but are still in their original location(s). 

332 North Franklin House, Facility #BT-PD-2005 (1934) *non-contributing/not eligible 

Because it has been moved from its original location and altered so extensively over time, the 332 

North Franklin dwelling rates low to medium in every integrity aspect. Due to major additions, it

is the least intact representative of its specific floor plan on the forest; much better examples exist

in Afton, Snider Basin, and a few blocks away in Pinedale. While the workmanship and most of 

the materials on the additions exhibit fairly high quality of integrity, its relocation to a different

setting in a configuration inconsistent with historic site planning principles is an adverse effect. 

e, Facility #BT-PD-7006 (1934) *non

was moved, it retains no histo

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 58
WILLOW CREEK GUARD STATION

Smithsonian #48-SU-481 

It is recommended that er of

Historic Places as a district under Criteria A and C, with a period of significance of 1933 to1935. 

Significant under the themes of architecture, conservation and government/politics, Willow Creek

is associated with early Forest Service management of timber and rangelands plus assorted 

mining claims on the south slope of the central Wind River Mountains. Willow Creek Guard 

Station is also the finest representative of a CCC-era Forest Service administrative compound 

remaining on the forest. With the exception of the latrine being moved from one spot to another,

the site and its four contributing buildings are nearly unchanged from the mid-1930s. 

On December 4, 1906, 20 acres that would become the Willow Creek administrative site were 

officially withdrawn from the public domain. Until 1926, Willow Creek Guard Station served as 

yearlong headquarters for the old Willow Creek Ranger District of the Bridger/Wyoming

National Forests. In 1926, the Willow Creek Ranger District consolidated with the adjacent

Kendall Ranger District, with new headquarters at Kendall Guard Station. There is no

information on or photos of any buildings that existed here before the CCC’s 1933 arrival. 

Over the next three years, CCC workers built a new guard station that could comfortably house 

rangers and other workers. Working from detailed standard plans developed by Regional

Architect George L. Nichols, the CCC built four buildings: a dwelling, garage, barn/fly shed, and

latrine. Agency workers also planted shrubs, built fences and corrals, constructed walkways and 

driveways, and cleared away excess trees. Save for shrubbery and tree growth – plus the 

outhouse shuffling about as the pit filled – Willow Creek is virtually the same place it was 

conceived of and constructed as nearly 70 years ago. This is a rare occurrence in Forest Service

history. 

Willow Creek Guard Station is eligible to the National Regist

The Willow Creek Garage. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 59
Due to a bad water supply er than for general storage 

Willow Creek Guard Station has not been used for several years. 

Willow Creek Barn, Facility #BT

The Willow Creek barn/fly shed rates high in all aspects of integrity. Built exactly to plan, it is 

the finest example of its floor plan on the forest. Unaltered over the years, the barn/fly shed has 

retained all of its character-defining features. It also associates nicely with Willow Creek’s other 

CCC-era buildings and the surrounding natural landscape. Period of significance is 1934, with 

themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Willow Creek Dwelling, Facility #BT-PD-4019 (1933)

The ranger dwelling at Willow Creek rates high in all aspects of integrity. One of only two on the 

forest (the other is at Dutch Joe GS) ever built with this specific floor plan, of the two it is the 

finest representative of the Forest Service’s vernacular interpretation of the Colonial Revival 

style. Despite some minor alterations, the dwelling has retained its character-defining features. It

associates strongly with the compound’s other CCC-era buildings, and with the surrounding 

natural landscape. Period of significance is 1933, with themes in architecture, conservation, and 

politics/government. 

Willow Creek Garage, Facility #BT-PD-7020 (1934)

The Willow Creek garage rates high in all aspects of integrity. Reversed yet built to plan, it is 

one of the finest representatives of its specific floor plan on the forest. Unaltered over the years,

the garage has retained all of its character-defining features. It also associates nicely with Willow 

Creek’s other CCC-era buildi pe. Period of significance is

1934, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

(and access issues with a local rancher), oth

-PD-8021 (1934)

ngs and the surrounding natural landsca

Willow Creek Outhouse, Facility #BT-PD-1090 (1935) 

As the only building at Willow Creek Guard Station that has a history of being moved, the latrine 

nonetheless rates high in all integrity aspects. It is one of the finest examples of a CCC-era 

latrine on the forest. The small structure associates well with the guard station’s other buildings

and with the natural landscape. Period of significance is 1935, with themes in architecture, 

conservation, and politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 60
CHAPTER THREE: EVALUATION SUMMARIES, TETON 

DIVISION 

Of the five Teton Division administrative sites surveyed in 2001, two are eligible to the 

National Register as districts. Most or all of the buildings in an eligible district are 

contributing resources, sometimes because they independently meet National Register 

criteria. Administrative sites that are not eligible as districts may have individually 

eligible buildings. 

HISTORIC DISTRICT AND BUILDING SUMMARIES

Administrative Unit 

Sites Eligible as 

Districts 

D-4: Jackson Ranger District 2 

 

D-6: Buffalo Ranger District 0 

Total 2 

 

Administrative Unit 

ting

and/or 

NonContributing* or 

Contribu

Individually 

Eligible Buildings 

Ineligible 

Buildings 

 

D-4: Jackson Ranger District 9 0 

 

D-6: Buffalo Ranger District 2 4 

 

Total 11 4 

*This count consists of historic buildings. Buildings that are not historic but are located 

in an eligible district are considered non-contributing. They are not included in this table. 

The following pages narrate the history and eligibility of each recorded administrative

site and historic building. They are organized by district within the Teton Division. 

Summaries include each property’s justification for eligibility to the National Register of

Historic Places. If evaluated as eligible, themes and areas of significance are included.

All buildings are contributing/eligible, unless otherwise *noted.

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 61
 JACKSON RANGER DISTRICT D-4 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 62
BRYAN FLAT GUARD STATION

Smithsonian #48-TE-938 

It is recommended that Bryan Flat Register of Historic 

gnificance: 1914-

20 and 1928-34.

politics/govern designed,

developed and initiall during 

ulti-structure 

compound with a m inistrative 

use by the Bridger-Teton 

Service trends during the New 

Deal, as funds became available. 

One of the oldest remaining guard stations on the forest, the Bryan Flat location has served as a

district headquarters and guard station since the Teton National Forest's 1908 creation from the 

old Yellowstone Forest Reserve. On August 7 the same year, 120 acres on "Bryan Flats" were

withdrawn for administrative use. In 1916, the withdrawal of another 325 acres for pasturage was 

approved, but this acreage was never officially withdrawn. 

It is unknown as to precisely when the Bryan Flat Ranger District was created, but it was one of 

several small, horse-patrolled districts within the expansive Teton National Forest. Forest Service 

directories list a Bryan Flat Ranger District from 1920 to 1925, and then entries cease. Evidence 

suggests that Bryan Flat Ranger District was absorbed sometime in the mid-1920s into the 

adjoining Hoback Ranger District, for investment and depreciation records from the 1930s list

Bryan Flat as part of the Hoback District, or D-4 of the old Teton National Forest. This fits in

with forest-wide patterns of district consolidation in the mid-1920s as automobiles started

replacing horses as the primary means of patrol. 

 Guard Station is eligible to the National

Places as a contiguous district under Criteria A and C, with dual periods of si

 Significant under the themes of architecture, conservation and 

ment, it is a fine example of a Forest Service administrative compound 

y constructed during the Forest Service's early years and expanded 

the New Deal. It is also historically unique as the only remaining intact, m

ixture of pre-World War I and New Deal-era buildings still in adm

National Forest. Brya Flat Guard Station associates well with Forest 

 of upgrading early administrativ sites immediately before and

Bryan Flat Main Dwelling. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

n

e

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 63
According to photographic re oric Society, a one-room log

cabin served as the site's first building. This cabin, located about 100 yards west of the 

cookhouse, no longer exists. The oldest existing structures are the cookhouse's south wing, 

constructed in 1914, and the office/storeroom, constructed in 1919. In 1928, the barn was built;

in 1931, the Forest Service added the north wing of the cookhouse, and in 1934, the Region Four 

Plan 23 garage was built by the Civilian Conservation Corps. Records also indicate a small log 

woodshed was part of the complex, but it is gone and no evidence of its whereabouts remain. 

Other than electrical and water modifications, Bryan Flat Guard Station remained unchanged 

until 1975, when the Forest Service constructed a shower house and a series of (now collapsed) 

tent structures for Youth Conservation Corps (YCC) workers. These non-historic structures are 

situated away from the historic and are not included in this evaluation. It is recommended that 

district boundaries follow fence lines to include the shower house, considered non-contributing. 

The forest still uses Bryan Flat as pasturage and a small work center, as well as seasonal housing 

for employees and YCC workers. 

Bryan Flat Barn, Facility #BT-JA-8014 (1920) 

Much like the rest of Bryan Flat Guard Station's historic buildings, the barn rates high in all 

categories. Materials and workmanship rate high, and the barn, with its associated corral 

network, associates well with the guard station's architectural and environmental features and 

aesthetics. The period of significance is 1920, with themes in architecture and conservation. 

Bryan Flat Bunkhouse, Facility

Although the last historic building constructed at the guard station, the Bryan Flat Garage rates 

the various additions and modifications, including the 1931

yan Flat Office/Storeroom, Facility #BT-JA-5012 (1919)

cords on file at the Teton County Hist

#BT-JA-5011 (1934)

high in all categories, especially materials and workmanship. Construction workers matched the 

building as closely matched as possible to the station's older structures. It is fine example of a

Region Four Plan 23 single car garage whose exterior has not been altered extensively over time. 

It fits in nicely with the guard station's overall environmental and architectural aesthetics. Period 

of significance is 1934, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Bryan Flat Dwelling, Facility #BT-JA-4010 (1914, expanded 1931) 

The Bryan Flat Dwelling/Cookhouse is an outstanding example of a Progressive Era Forest

Service administrative structure built from native lodgepole pine materials. Materials and

workmanship rate very high, and

north wing addition, are for the most part skillfully done and sympathetic to the original 

building's architectural aesthetics. Feeling and association also rate high because the building fits 

in nicely with its surrounding environment, as well as the complex's other historic structures.

Periods of significance are 1914 and 1931, with themes in architecture and conservation. 

Br

Much like the other three historic structures at Bryan Flat Guard Station, the office/storeroom has 

retained well its historic integrity over time. It rates high in all categories: workmanship and

materials are stellar, and associates nicely with the surrounding buildings and landscape. It 

appears the office/storeroom was constructed as a companion to the larger cookhouse's south

section, for it is almost identical. And much like the cookhouse, the office/storeroom is unique:

there are no other buildings like it on the forest. Save for the batten-profile metal roof, it is near 

original. Period of significance is 1919-1920, with themes in architecture and conservation. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 64
GOOSEWING GUARD STATION 

Smithsonian #48-TE-1590 

It is recommended that Goosewing Guard Station is eligible to the National Register of Historic 

Places as a contiguous district under Criteria A and C, with a period of significance of 1934-

1935. Significant under the themes of architecture, conservation and politics/government, it is a 

fine example of a standard Forest Service guard station constructed by the Civilian Conserv

Goosewing Main Dwelling. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

ation

Corps during the New Deal. 

On December 31, 1921, the withdrawal of 80 acres for the Goosewing Administrative Site on the

lthough

it is unknown when this structure was built, it is similar to the so-called "Rocky Mountain Cabin"

r th main entry. Surrounded by a 

ional

plan. 

A sixth building, an outhouse, was built around the same time but was removed sometime after 

upper Gros Ventre River was approved. Teton National Forest Supervisor A.C McCain viewed it 

as a valuable shelter site for the winter monitoring of elk grazing range conditions. He wrote the 

same year that winter trips to monitor game conditions from Horsetail Ranger Station to the upper

Gros Ventre River was too far on snowshoes, and that Goosewing would allow "more thorough

investigations and better conduct of our winter work generally." 

Historic site photos indicate a small log-cabin structure, of which no evidence remains. A

vernacular, with the unsupported front gable roof extension ove e

wood fence, it looks identical to the cabin at Elk Creek Guard Station on the forest's far southern

reaches, and similar to the Old Blackrock Station that currently sits behind the Buffalo District 

Office east of Moran Junction. 

In 1934 and 1935, the CCC constructed the five buildings that currently comprise Goosewing

Guard Station: the barn, main dwelling, garage, and two gas houses, one of which was converted 

to a generator shed. The barn, dwelling, and garage follow standard plans designed by Reg

Architect George L. Nichols, while the two gas houses do not follow any kind of standard

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 65
1984. In the 1940s and 195 ere modified and expanded. 

Although possibly not eligible to the National Register as individual buildings, both have merit as 

contributing elements to the distr many of their character-defining 

architectural features. The Jackson Ranger District currently uses the Goosewing Guard Station 

for seasonal employee housing and as a base for rangers patrolling the Gros Ventre Wilderness.

Goosewing Barn, Facility #BT-JA-8017 (1934) 

The Goosewing Guard Station barn rates high in most aspects. It is a fine example of a Forest

Service administrative building designed and constructed during the New Deal era. Built to plan, 

the exterior has changed very little over the last 70 years, and it is the best example of this 

particular floor plan on the forest. The only changes are extensive interior modifications, the only 

factors that might affect overall historic integrity. Nonetheless, that the building's exterior has 

remained unchanged over seven decades outweighs any utilitarian interior modifications. Period 

of significance is 1934, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Goosewing Bunkhouse, Facility #BT-JA-5016 (1935)

The Goosewing bunkhouse rates high in most justification aspects. Although modified to serve 

as an overflow bunkhouse for seasonal workers, most of the exterior modifications – albeit 

questionable in design – were performed with high levels of craftsmanship. While these 

alterations may have diminished the building's individual merit, it retains enough characterdefining features to contribute to the site's significance. It is a good example of how sympathetic

modifications to a standard plan can help maintain historic integrity. Period of significance is

1935, with themes in architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Goosewing Dwelling, Facility #BT-JA-4015 (1934)

e dwelling's association to the rest of the site is apparent because it

ains many character-defining architectural features. Thus, the dwelling adds to the district's 

spects of integrity. It is a fine 

ample of a New Deal-era flammables storage structure, and associates well with the site's other

acility #BT-JA-2019 (1934) 

0s, the garage and main dwelling w

ict because they have retained

Goosewing Guard Station's main dwelling is a good example of how additions and modifications 

over time can affect individual historic integrity. Because of this, the dwelling rates medium in

all aspects, and has been altered to such an extent that it would not be individually eligible to the 

National Register. However, it has merit as a contributing element to the district. Even with the 

additions and modifications, th

ret

historic associations and architectural qualities. Period of significance is 1934, with themes in

architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

Goosewing Gas House, Facility #BT-JA-0018 (1934)

Goosewing Guard Station's Gas House (below) rates high in all a

ex

historic buildings. Workmanship and materials used in exterior construction and modifications

are sympathetic to the guard station's other buildings, including its companion generator shed.

Period of significance is 1934, with themes in architecture, conservation, and

politics/government. 

Goosewing Generator Shed, F

Much like its companion gas/oil house, the Goosewing Generator Shed (below) rates high in all 

aspects of integrity. The modern, louvered metal vents installed on each gable elevations are 

minor distractions from the historic integrity. Period of significance is 1934, with themes in

architecture, conservation, and politics/government. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 66
BUFFALO RANGER DISTRICT D-6 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 67
BUFFALO ADMINISTRATIVE SITE 

Smithsonian #48-TE-1589

It is recommended that the Buffalo Administrative Site, a.k.a. Blackrock Work Center, is not

eligible to the National Register of Historic Places. While 4 of the center's oldest buildings are

already listed on the National Register as the Rosencrans Cabin National Historic District, the 

other 4 buildings old enough to qualify are of such disparate temporal and architectural nature 

that they do not contribute in any way to the site's overall historic integrity. Other factors are the 

work center's many modern structural additions – prefabricated log homes, metal warehouses,

mobile homes – that negatively affect any historical relationships between buildings and property. 

Although Rudolph Rosencrans, the first ranger of the Teton National Forest's Blackrock/Buffalo

Ranger District, constructed the original buildings on this site in the 1900s and 1910s (4 are part 

of the historic district, while the other sits directly behind the Buffalo Ranger District office as an

interpretive site), recorded history before 1906 is non-existent. On November 13 of that year, 

61.4 acres were withdrawn for administrative purposes. Two years later, about the time the Teton

National Forest was officially carved out of th old Yellowstone Forest Reserve, another 228

acres adjacent to the Buffalo Fork River were drawn. Citing need for hay land "for the 

maintenance of government horses," in 1912 Rosencrans requested withdrawal of another 40 

acres. The request was approved, but the acreage never withdrawn. About this time, Rosencrans 

and his crew built the log structures – house with addition, garage, shed, and barn – that currently

comprise the historic district. 

On August 6, 1980, the Rosencrans Cabin Historic District (48-TE-971) was listed in the 

National Register of Historic Places. Located within the boundaries of the Buffalo 

Administrative site (48-TE-1589), the district encompasses 4 contributing buildings (house, 

garage, barn and shed) and one non-contributing building (outhouse). According to the 

Blackrock Old Gas House. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

e

with

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 68
nomination, the district ecture, conservation, and 

politics/government; this document, however, is sparse and does not specify periods of

significance nor criteria. Othe ates it was significant for its 

association with early Forest Service administration of public lands (Criterion A, c.1915-1928), 

its association with ranger Rudolph Rosencrans (Criterion B, c.1915-1928) and its pre-New Deal

era construction and design (Criterion C, c.1915). 

Although the outhouse was mentioned in the district nomination form, at that time it was not

deemed old enough for inclusion. One purpose of this evaluation is to determine if the latter has 

achieved contributing status and if the buildings in 48-TE-1589 have achieved historic 

significance. The other three buildings in 48-TE-1589 barely qualify as old enough for the

register, for it is estimated that both were built from c.1935 to the early 1950s; again, no written

records can confirm this assertion. A gashouse right on the boundary of the historic district may

have been moved to the site. A bunkhouse approximately 100 yards south of the district is an

interesting mixture of different building sections added on over time, while its adjacent shed was

moved to Blackrock in 1996 from the old Hatchet Ranch a couple miles west to serve as guest 

quarters. 

The problem with these buildings is they are situated among many newer structures, so there are 

no substantive building-to-site historic relationships. Unlisted historic buildings on the Buffalo 

Administrative Site – including the outhouse – do not represent a cohesive district, nor can they 

achieve individual eligibility. 

Blackrock Old Bunkhouse, Facility #BT-BU-5014 (1952) *non-contributing/not eligible 

The Blackrock Work Center Bunkhouse, if anyt ing, is unique. No other building on the forest 

nsported this surplus shed on wood skids from the Hatchet Ranch RV park one mile west of 

gas house does not meet the definition of a contributing resource 

thin the adjacent Rosencrans Cabin Historic District, nor not meet the criteria to warrant a 

is significant in the areas of archit

r information, however, indic

h

comes close in appearance or style (see photos and narrative below). On its own, it fits in and

associates well in its location. Yet materials and workmanship rate low to medium at best, for 

many of the additions are incompatible to previous periods of construction with a mixture of 

older and modern materials, for example the windows, to illustrate any historic continuity. 

Old Bunkhouse Shed, Facility #BT-BU-2048 (c.1950) *non-contributing/not eligible 

According to Buffalo District Stock Manager Jack Hatch, in 1996 he physically uplifted and 

tra

the work center to its present location For this, it rates low in location and setting. Design, 

workmanship and materials rate medium at best, for the building appears to have been thrown

together using scrap lumber. There is also a question of when it was first built; the best estimate 

is in the early 1950s. 

Blackrock Old Gas House, Facility #BT-BU-0107 (1935) *non-contributing/not eligible 

Although the construction date is unknown, the gas house is estimated to be a CCC-era building.

It rates high in design, workmanship, and materials. Integrity of setting is low as only the

adjacent latrine also dates from that era. It is possible that it was moved to its existing location 

but this is also unknown. The

wi

determination of individual eligibility. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 69
Blackrock Outhouse, Facility #BT-BU-1018 (1935) *non-contributing/not eligible 

Located within the boundaries of the Rosencrans Cabin Historic District, the latrine does not

contribute to the district's historic significance because it was constructed after the periods of 

significance. It also does not meet the criteria to warrant a determination of individual eligibility.

In addition, there are much more intact representative examples of this particular floor plan on the

forest. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 70
HAWKS REST PATROL CABIN

Smithsonian #48-TE-1274 

It is reco gister of Historic 

Places under Criteria A ificant under the 

themes of ar e of recent, pure vernacular 

architecture –

weather 

features since in the housing of wilderness 

rangers at one of Am

in the 1990s, a non-contributing resource. 

Named for the mountain that rises vertically just behind the cabin, this mountain's west exposure 

of this mountain is pock-marked with small holes and caves that provide a natural aviary habitat. 

Originally known as Bridger Lake Administrative site, an approval for withdrawal was granted on

February 13, 1943, but the site was never formally withdrawn. There is record (but no pictures 

available) of a smaller log cabin built in the early 1930s for game administration, but it was 

abandoned in 1945. A couple years later, an irate grizzly bear severely damaged the old cabin,

and it was subsequently dismantled. 

Because of the huge increase in Teton Wilderness recreation traffic during the immediate postwar

era, the Forest Service decided that it needed a new patrol cabin in the Yellowstone Meadows 

area, which is popular with outfitters, backpackers, big-game hunters, and anglers. In 1950, the

Forest Service, with the assistance of Moran Junction contractors Bill Daniels and Pete Fuez,

constructed the present cabin from local materials. Since then, the cabin has received numerous 

utilitarian interior upgrades to make it more comfortable for the regular wilderness patrol rangers 

and fire crews. These upgrades do not detract from the building's historic character. The cabin 

receives heavy administrative use from June to October. 

mmended that Hawks Rest Patrol Cabin is eligible to the National Re

and C, with a period of significance of 1950. Sign

chitecture and conservation, it is a fine exampl

 a handcrafted, remote wilderness patrol cabin reinforced to withstand the forces of 

and curious wildlife. Unique to the forest, this cabin has retained all of its rustic historic 

 construction, and continues to play an important role

erica's most remote locations. The site also contains a newer outhouse built 

Hawks Rest Patrol Cabin, one of the agency’s most isolated administrative sites. 

Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 71
Hawks Rest Patrol Cabin, Fa

Despite exterior additions for building protection, the Hawks Rest Patrol cabin rates high in all

aspects. Constructed during the fine example of pure vernacular 

architecture, a building constructed by local people not formally trained to do so. Workmanship

and materials are top-notch, and although alterations/additions were performed to the interior, 

they do not compromise this cabin's wilderness character. It is a good example of a remote Forest

Service administrative site small enough not to be intrusive upon the landscape, but substantial 

enough to comfortably accommodate multiple parties over time. Period of significance is 1950, 

with themes in architecture and conservation. 

cility #BT-BU-4032 (1950) 

postwar recreation boom, it is a

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 72
OLD BLACKROCK OFFICE 

Smithsonian #48-TE-1221 

The Old Blackrock Station. Jim Bailey/USFS Photo 

It is recommended that the Old Blackrock Office, a.k.a. Rosie’s Office, is eligible to the National 

Register of Historic Places under Criteria B and C, with a period of significance of 1904-1924. 

Significant under themes of architecture and conservation, it is a good example of early ranger 

cabin vernacular. It is associated with Ranger Rudolph "Rosie" Rosencrans, hired in 1904 as the

first ranger of the newly created Teton Division of the Yellowstone Forest Reserve. This small

cabin has been moved at least twice: once in 1968 to the Teton National Forest Supervisor's

Office in Jackson to serve as an interpretive exhibit on old ranger stations, then back again in

August 1991 to the Buffalo Ranger District to serve in the same capacity. However, it is the only 

surviving example of a pre-Forest Service administrative structure, thus heightening its historical 

significance. It is also the oldest surviving Bridger-Teton administrative structure still in use. 

Although little is known about this cabin, much is known about its builder. In his book on old 

Forest Service administrative buildings, Les Joslin claims the cabin was built in 1904 by Rudolph 

Rosencrans, a famous figure in Jackson Hole history. Born in Austria in 1875 to the country's 

chief forester and educated in mathematics and languages at the University of Vienna, "Rosie" 

came to America via San Francisco in the late 1890s. A skilled mountaineer, in the early 1900s 

he gravitated south to the Jackson Hole country. Recognizing his education and outdoor 

knowledge, in 1904 Yellowstone Forest Reserve Superintendent A.A. Anderson appointed 

Rosencrans as the first ranger of the reserve's Teton Division, which four years later became the

Teton National Forest. The same year, Rosencrans (and John Alsop) constructed this cabin to

serve as an office and dwelling (over the next two decades, Rosencrans would build the structures 

that comprise the Rosencrans Cabin National Historic District). 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 73
Rosencrans' contributions to Teton National Forest history are substantial. He personified Chief 

Forester Gifford Pinchot's quest oors-wise professionals to staff

the newly created Forest Servic nger of the Buffalo/Blackrock

District of the Teton National Forest, Rosencrans patrolled a radius of 25-50 miles in all 

directions by ski, snowshoe, or ho ued grazing permits, constructed

trails, culverts, and ditches, rescued the lost and recovered the dead, hosted famous dignitaries 

like Theodore Roosevelt and William "Buffalo Bill" Cody, and battled forest fires – all while 

surveying then drawing detailed maps of his expansive district. These maps, the first ever, are

perhaps his greatest contribution. That he drew these maps under dim light may have contributed 

to his eventual blindness, which forced his 1924 retirement. Rosencrans died in Jackson in 1970, 

and is buried on ridge a mile northeast of the cabin. 

The cabin's original location, however, remains a mystery. The forest archeologist believes it

stood in the same area as the Rosencrans Cabin National Historic District, located about 3/4 mile 

north of where the cabin now sits. Since the four other buildings Ranger Rosencrans and his crew 

constructed comprise this district, it makes sense that the cabin could have been originally located

near these buildings. Although shuffled to Jackson and back as a mobile interpretive exhibit, this 

small, rustic log cabin (one of the last two of its kind on the forest) it is nonetheless significant for 

its architectural value. Therefore, because the Old Blackrock Office is associated with an 

individual famous in Jackson Hole and early Teton National Forest history – and that it is this

individual's oldest surviving building – it meets NRHP eligibility requirements under Criterion 

Consideration B. 

Old Blackrock Station, a.k.a. Rosie’s Office, Facility #BT-BU-0026 (1904) 

Although this small cabin has been moved from Buffalo District to Jackson and back again as an 

interpretive exhibit, it still rates medium to high in all aspects of integrity. As the oldest and only

for educated, yet dedicated, outd

e ranks. As the first District Ra

rseback. He counted game, iss

surviving pre-National Forest structure on the Bridger-Teton, it is associated with Ranger

Rudolph Rosencrans, one of the first rangers in one of America's first national forests. 

Constructed by Rosencrans in 1904, the cabin has retained all of its primary architectural features. 

It is also one of only two pre-World War I, log single-cell ranger cabins still in administrative use 

by the forest (the other is Elk Creek Guard Station on the Kemmerer District). Period of 

significance is 1904-1924, with themes in architecture and conservation. 

VOLUME II: EVALUATIONS, PAGE 74