FOURTH D I VI SI ON

BA RNES, P. J.

, RA Y and M CM I LLI A N, JJ.

N O T IC E : M otions for r e c ons i de r a tion m us t be

ph y sic a l ly r e ce iv ed i n our c le r k ’s offic e w ithin te n

da y s of the da te of de c is ion to be de e m ed tim e ly file d.

http://w w w .ga a ppe a ls .us /r ule s /

Jul y 14, 2015



# I n th e Co u r t o f

A p p eals o f

G eo r g ia

A1 5 A0 67 0 . SM ITH et al . v . W ILLIAM S et al

.

R A Y , J u d g e.

Th i s cas e s t em s fro m t he b reak u p o f a l aw fi rm

, Sm it h, H al l & W il l iam s

, LLP.

Lu an n e Bry an t Sm i t h an d Lu an ne Bry an t Sm i th

, P. C. (co l l ect iv el y “ Sm i t h ”) fi l ed t h i s

d i r e c t ap p eal fro m th ree tri al co u rt o rd ers en tered i n a s u it b et ween Sm it h a n d h e r

o n et i m e l aw p art n er, J en n i fer E. W i l l i am s

, an d J en n i fer E. W i ll i am s

, LLC

(co l l ect i v el y “ W i ll i am s ”). Fo r t h e reas on s t h at fo l l ow, we affi rm i n p art an d rev ers e

i n p art

.

Th e fi rm h an d l ed d o m es t i c, p ers o n al i n ju ry

, an d wo rk ers ’ co m

pen s at i o n cas es

,

a m o n g o t h ers

. In N o v em b er 2 0 1 2

, W i ll i am s al l eg es t h at

, wi t h o ut no t i ce, Sm i th

p ack ed u p h er t hi ng s

, to ok cas e fi l es

, an d l eft t h e o ffi ce. A ft er Sm i t h l eft

, 1 W i l l i am s

1 Th e p art i es d o n ot ag ree o n t h e i s s ue o f wh en t h e part n ers h i p act u al l y en d ed

.s u ed

, s eek i n g d i s s o l u t i on o f t he p art n ers h i p an d al l eg i n g b reach o f co n t ract

. Sh e al s o

m o ved fo r an i n

ju n ct io n

. Th e p o rt i o n o f t h ei r d i s p u t e t hat i s b efo re t h i s Co u rt t u rn s

p ri m ari l y o n i s s u es rel at e d t o a d i v i s i o n o f t he fees earn ed fro m cert ai n wo rk ers ’

co m p en s at i o n cas es wh ere t h e cl i en t s el ect ed t o ret ai n Sm i t h as th ei r co u n s el aft er

Sm it h an d W i l l i am s ceas ed p ract i ci n g t o g et h er. W i l l i am s s eek s 5 0 p ercen t o f t h o s e

fees

.

1

. Sm i t h co n t en d s t hat t h e t ri al co u rt erred i n d en y i ng h er m o t i o n t o d i s m i s s fo r

l ack of s u b

ject m at t er ju ri s d i ct i o n

. 2 Th e g r a v am en of Sm i t h ’ s arg u m en t i s t h at t h i s

cas e i n v o l v es a di s pu t e o v er a t t o r n e y fees i n wo rk ers ’ co m pen s at i o n cas es an d t h at

t h e St at e Bo ard o f W o rk ers ’ Co m p en s at io n (t he “ Bo ard ”) h as ex cl u s i v e j u ri s d i ct i o n

o v er s u ch d i s p u tes . Th e t ri al co u rt d i d n o t err.

W e rev i ew a t ri al co u rt ’ s r u l i n g o n a m o ti on t o d i s m i s s de n ov o

. Aet n a v.

W o r ker s ’ Co mp Acces s, LLC v. Co l i s eu m Med ica l C t r

, , 3 2 2 Ga. Ap p

. 6 41

, 6 4 4 (1 )

(7 4 6 SE2 d 1 4 8 ) (2 01 3). An ex am i nat i o n of t h e n at ure, ju ri s d ict i o n

, an d au t h o ri ty o f

t h e Bo ard i s i n s t ru ct i v e h ere.

2 Sm i t h h as n ot an swered W i l l i am s ’ co m pl ai n t

, b ut rat her h as en t ered a s p eci al

ap p earan ce wi t h o u t s u bm i t t i n g t o t h e ju ri s d i ct i on o f t h e t ri al co urt

.

2Th e Bo ard i s a “ creat u re o f s t at u t e” w i t h o n l y t h e ju ri sd i ct i o n

, po wer,

an d au t h o ri ty co nferred u p o n i t b y t h e Gen eral As s em b l y

. See OCGA §

3 4 -9 -4 0 (“ Th e [B] o ard s hal l h av e fu l l au t h ori t y

, p o wer, an d t h e d u t y t o

p ro m u l g at e p o l i ci es

, ru l es

, an d reg u l at i on s fo r t h e ad m i n i s t rat io n o f t h i s

ch ap t er.”)

. . . Th e Bo ard p erfo rm s al l th e p o wers an d d u ti es rel at in g t o

t h e en fo rcem en t o f t h e W o rk ers ’ Co m p en s at i o n Act (t h e “ Act ”), an d th e

Act s h al l b e l i b eral ly co n s t ru ed on l y f o r t h e p u r

p o s e o f br i n g i n g

emp l o yer s a n d emp l oyees wi t h i n t h e p r o vi s i o ns of t h i s ch a pt er a n d t o

p r o vi d e p r o t ect i o n f

o r b o t h

.

(Ci t at i o n s an d fo o t n o t e o m i t t ed ; em p h as i s s u p p li ed .) Id

. See al s o O CGA § 3 4 -9 -5 8.

Th e act i on b et we e n Sm i t h an d W il l i am s i s cl earl y n o t o n e b et ween an em p l o y er

an d an em p l o y ee wi t h i n t h e A ct ’ s p ro v i s io n s. Ho wev er, t hi s Co u rt h as reco gniz ed t h at

t h e Bo ard al s o h as ju ri s di ct i o n t o res o l ve an ci l l ary i s su es rel at i n g t o an em

p l o y ee’ s

co m p en s at i o n ri g h ts un d er t h e Act

. See B u i l d er s In s

. Gr o u

p, I n c

. v

. Ker -W

i l

En t er p ri s es

, In c.

, 2 7 4 Ga. Ap p. 5 2 2

, 5 2 3 -5 24 (2 ) (6 1 8 SE2 d 1 60 ) (2 0 0 5 ) (i f a d i s p u t e

i s an ci l l ary t o an em

p l o y ee’ s ri gh t

, t he Bo ard h as au t ho ri t y t o act ; wh en th e ri g h t s o f

an em p l o y ee i n a p en d in g cl ai m are n o t at s t ak e, th e Bo ard m ay d is av o w j u ri s d i ct i o n

wh en , fo r ex am

p le, t h e d i s p u t e i s o v er an i n s urer’ s d u t y t o p ay a p art i cu l ar s h are o f

an award b u t t h e award i t sel f i s n o t u n d er at t ack ).

3Th e q ues t i o n h ere i s w h et h er W i l l i am s ’ cl ai m s ag ai n st Sm i t h are an ci l l ary to

t h e d et erm i n at i o n o f t h e ri g h t s o f t h e em p l o y ee-cl ai m an t s si n ce at to rn ey ’ s fees are at

i s su e, t h u s fal l i n g w i t hi n t h e Bo ard ’ s ex cl u s iv e ju ri s d ict i o n

. Wh i le i t is t ru e t h at

s p eci fi c cl ai m an t s are referen ced i n t h es e cas es

, n ei t h er p art y p o in ts t o an y cl ai m an t

“ wh o s e cl ai m of ben efi t s wo ul d b e affect ed b y [t h e] res o l u t i o n o f [W i l l i am s ’ ] cl ai m

ag ai n s t [Sm i th ]

. Acco rd i n g l y

, we d o n o t fi nd t hes e al l eg at i o n s i m p li cat e t h e b en efi t s

t o b e p ai d t o an y in d i v i d u al i n ju red em p l oy ee, b u t i n s tead al l e g e a s y s t em i c fai l u re

wi t h i n [t h e ers t wh i le l aw fi rm of Sm i t h

, Hal l & W i l l i am s ] .” Aet n a

, s up ra at 6 4 5 (1 ).

It i s t ru e t h at OCGA § 3 4 -9 -1 08 (a) req u i res Bo ard ap pro v al o f at t o rn ey fees

i n ex ces s o f $ 1 00 an d li m i t s at t o rn ey fees t o 2 5 p e rcen t o f a cl ai m an t ’ s award

.

Ho wev er, t h e s tat u t e b y i t s o wn t erm s cl earl y d eal s wi t h t h e Bo ard ’ s pro t ect i o n o f t h e

ri gh t s o f em

p l o y ee-cl ai m an t s in rel at i on t o th ei r at t o rn ey s rat h er t h an t h e ri g ht s o f o n e

at t o rn ey i n rel at i o n t o an o t h er at t o rn ey

.

Th e St at e Bo ard o f W ork [er] ’ s Co m p en s at i o n has au t ho ri t y t o ex am in e

an d ap p ro v e co n t ract s b e t ween cl ai ma n t s a n d t h ei r co un s el as t o th e

am o u nt o f at t o rn ey s fees b u t i t h as n o au t ho ri t y

, s t at u t o ry o r ot h erwi s e,

t o s et t h e fees o f th e at t o rn ey s

, n o r t o exa mi n e a n d a p p r o v e c o n t r a ct

s

b et ween a t t o rn eys a s to t h e d i vi s i o n o f th e i r f ees w h en as s o ci at ed t o

rep res en t cl ai m an t s

.

4(Ci t at i o n s o m i t t ed ; em p h as is su p p l i ed .) Fel dma n v. Ed wa rd s

, 10 7 Ga. Ap p

. 3 9 7

, 3 9 7

(1 ) (1 30 SE2 d 3 50 ) (1 9 6 3 ). Th e t ri al co u rt d i d n o t err.

2

. Sm i t h arg u es t h at th e t ri al c o u r t e rred i n d en y i n g h er m o t i o n fo r p art i al

s u m m ary ju d g m en t

.

On ap p eal fro m t h e g ran t o r d en i al o f s u m m ary ju d g m en t

, t h is Co u rt ap p l i es a

d e n o v o s t an d ard o f rev i ew. Su m m ary ju d g m en t i s p ro p er wh en t h ere i s n o g en u i n e

i s su e as t o an y m at eri al fact an d t h e m ov i n g p art y i s en t i t l ed to ju d g m en t as a m at t er

o f l aw. W e m

u s t v i ew t h e ev i d en ce, an d al l reas o n ab l e i nferen ces d rawn fro m i t

, in

t h e l ig h t m o s t fav o rab l e t o t h e n o n m o v an t

. W o od cr a f t b y Ma cDo n a ld

, In c. v. Ga

. Ca s

.

a n d S u r . Co

. , 2 9 3 Ga. 9 , 1 0 (7 43 SE2 d 3 7 3 ) (2 0 1 3 ).

Sm i t h al l eg es t h at W i l l i am s was n ot i fi ed

, i n w r i t i n g an d b y Sep t em b er 1 9,

2 0 1 3

, a t th e l at es t

, t h at cl ai m an t s i n t h e co n t es t ed cas es h ad term i n at ed W i l l i am s ’ s

s erv i ces

. Sh e arg u es t h at b ecau s e W i l l i am s fai l ed t o f i l e at t o rn ey fee li en s o n t h es e

cas es wi t h t h e Bo ard i n acco rd an ce wi t h St at e Bo ard of W ork ers ’ Co m p en s at i o n Ru l e

1 0 8 (e) (“ Bo ard Ru l e”), s h e h as wai v ed an y cl ai m fo r fees i n t h e co nt es t ed cas es

.

5It i s u n d i sp u t ed t h at W i l l i am s d id n o t fi l e at t o rn ey fee l i en s wi t h t h e Bo ard in

t h e d i s pu t ed cas es

. 3 W h en an em p l o y e e an d h i s o r h er at t o rn ey t erm in at e t h ei r

co n tract as o u t l i n ed b el o w, Bo ard Ru l e 1 0 8 (e) p ro v i des , i n p ert i nen t p art , t h at

[a] n at t o rn ey o f reco rd wh o ch o o ses t o fi l e a l i en f o r s erv i ces an d / o r

ex p en s es m

u s t d o s o b y fi l i n g wri t t en n o t i ce o f t h e co n t en d ed v al u e o f

s u ch s erv i ces an d / o r ex p en s es wi t h t h e Bo ard

. . . wi t h i n 2 0 d ay s aft er

(i ) wi t hd rawal fro m t h e cas e, o r (i i) n o ti ce o f t erm i n at i o n o f t h e co n tract

i n wri ti n g b y

t h e cl i en t

. . . . Fai l u re t o perfect a l i en i n t h is m an n er wi l l

b e co n s i d ered a wai v er o f fu rt h er at t o rn ey s ’ fees

.

Th e t ri al co u rt

, h o wev er, d en i ed Sm i t h ’ s m o t i o n fo r p art i al s u m m ary ju d g m en t

,

fi n d i n g

, i n a n arro wl y tai l o red o rd er, t h at “ s ever a l ca s es s et tl ed p r i o r t o t h e

‘t er m i n a t i o n ’ l et t er

s sen t by [Sm i t h ] an d t h at s a i d ca ses are as s et s an d

. . . are fo r a

d et erm i n at i o n at a fi n al t ri al .” (Em p has i s s u p p li ed .)

Vi ewi n g t h e fact s in t he l i g h t m o s t fav o rab le t o W i l l i am s as t h e no n m o v an t

, t h e

cas es t h e t ri al co u rt referen ces were as s et s an d as s u ch m ay b e s u b ject t o en fo rcem en t

t h ro u g h t h e p art ners h i p ag reem en t b ecau s e t h ere rem ai ns a m at eri al fact u al d i s p u t e

as t o wh en t h e p art n ers hi p t erm i n at ed

. Sm i t h arg u ed t h at t h e part n ers h i p en d ed wh en

3 W i l l iam s s en t a l et t er an d at t o rn ey fee l i en t o o p p o s i n g co u n s el i n o n e cas e,

h o wev er.

6s h e left t h e o ffi ce No v em b er 24

, 2 0 1 2

. W i l l i am s arg u ed t h at th e p art n ers h i p was n ot

t erm i n at ed m erel y b y Sm i t h ’ s l eav i n g t h e o ffi ce, an d th ere i s ev i den ce t h at t he p art i es

s p l i t fe es ev en aft er t h e d at e th at Sm i t h al leg es t h e p art n ers hi p en d ed

. Th ere al so i s

ev i d en ce t h at as o f Ju n e 1 6

, 2 0 14

, t he p art n ers hi p affai rs h ad n o t b een wo un d u p

. See

OCGA § 1 4 -8 -3 0 (“ On d is s o l u t i o n t h e part n ers h i p i s no t t erm i n at ed

, b u t c o n t i n u es

u n t i l t h e wi n d i n g u p o f t h e p art n ers h i p affai rs i s co m p let ed ”). As a res u l t

, an d as

d et erm i n ed b y t h e t ri al co urt

, i n an act i o n s u ch as t h is th at s eek s t o en d a p art n ers h i p,

t h e d et erm i n at i o n o f t h e v al u e o f as s et s an d l i ab il i t i es i s pro p erl y res erv ed u n t i l t h e

m ai n d et erm i n at io n o f t h e cas e. Ro g er s v. M cDo n al d

, 2 2 4 Ga. 5 99

, 6 01 (1 ) (1 6 3 SE2 d

7 1 9 ) (1 9 68 ). See g en eral l y Jo r d a n v. M os es

, 2 9 1 Ga. 3 9

, 4 1 (7 2 7 SE2 d 4 6 0 ) (2 0 1 2 )

(“ A p art n er m ay n ot d i s s o l v e a p ar t n e r s h i p t o g ai n t he b en efi t s o f t h e bu s in es s fo r

h i m s e l f

, u n l es s h e fu l l y

co m pen s at es h i s co -p art n er fo r h is sh are o f t h e p ro s p ect i v e

b u s i n es s o p p o rt u n i t y ”) (ci t at i o n o m i t t ed ).

Co n trary t o Sm i th ’ s arg u m en t

, t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er b y i ts own term s d o es n ot

co v er ca s e s i n wh i ch t h e co n t i ng en cy ju s t i fy i n g t h e fee h ad y et t o b e earn ed

, as t h e

c a s es co v ered b y t h e o rd er were p rev i o u s l y “ s et t l ed ,” s o Sm i t h’ s rel i an ce o n T h e

7E ich ho l

z La w Fi r m, P .C. v. Ta t e La w Gr o u p

, LLC

, 31 0 Ga. Ap p

. 8 4 8, 8 50

- 8 5 3 ( 1 )

(7 1 4 SE2 d 4 1 3 ) (2 0 1 1 ) i s m i sp l aced . Th e t ri al co u rt d i d n o t err.

3

. Sm i t h arg u es t h at t h e t ri al co u rt erred i n g ran t i n g W i l l i am s ’ m ot i o n t o h av e

Sm it h p l ace ad di ti o n al at t o rn ey fees i n tru s t b ecau s e do i ng s o m od i fi ed a p ri o r

c o n s e n t ord er fo r an i nt erl ocu t o ry i n ju n ct io n t h at req u i red each p art y to p l ace 5 0

p ercen t o f at t o rn ey

fees fro m

co n t es t ed cas es i n es cro w.

Th e g ran t i n g an d co nt i n u i n g o f i n ju n ct i o n s s h al l al way s res t i n t h e s o u n d

d i s cret i o n o f th e ju d g e, acco rd i n g t o t h e ci rcu m s t an ces o f each cas e. T he

d i s cret i o n o f t he t ri al ju d g e i s a d i s cret i o n b as ed o n t h e l aw an d th e

ev i d en ce befo re h i m

. A p et i t i on t o m o d i fy an i n t erl o cu t o ry i nju nct i o n

can n o t b e g ran t ed i n t h e ab s en ce o f a m eri t o r i o u s sh o wi n g t h at s u ch

m o d i fi cat i o n s h ou l d b e m ad e.

(Ci t at i o n s an d p u n ct uat i o n o m it t ed

. ) Kel ley v

. K e l l ey

, 2 2 8 Ga. 63 9

, 6 4 0 (1 8 7 SE2 d

2 8 4 ) (1 9 7 2 ). OCGA § 9 -5 -8 (g ran t i n g an d co n t i n u in g i nju nct i on s res t s i n t he s o u n d

d i s cret i o n of t h e t ri al co u rt an d s h o u ld n ot b e u s ed o t h er t h an i n c l e a r a n d u rg en t

cas es ).

Th e i n i ti al i n

ju n ct i on req u i red t hat 5 0 p ercen t o f at to rn e y f e es fro m s p eci fi c

l i st ed cas es b e d ep o s i t e d i n t ru s t acco un t s an d n o t d i s b u rs ed ex cep t b y wri t t en

ag reem en t o f th e p art i es an d t h ei r lawy ers

, o r by co u rt o rd er. W i l l i am s s o u g h t a

8m o d i fi cat i o n t o ad d i n fees fro m t wo o t h er cas es

, th e Di s h m an cas e an d t h e K e l l e r

cas e, wh i ch h ad s et t l ed an d fro m wh ich fees h ad b een di s b urs ed t o Sm i t h ’ s op erat i n g

acco u n t pri o r t o t he i n it i al i n j u n ct i o n

.

In t h e m o d i fi cat i o n o rd er ap p eal ed fro m

, t h e t ri al co u rt d et erm in ed th at Sm i th

was “ ab o u t t o s et t l e a l arg e cas e” an d s h ou l d p lace “ th o se fu n d s i n t ru s t ” t o ap p l y to

“ o n e-h al f o f t h e fees ,” s p eci fi cal l y o n t he Di s hm an an d K el l er cas es

, w i th i n 1 0 day s

o f t h e en t ry o f t he o rd er. Sm it h fi l ed a m ot i o n fo r cl ari fi cat i o n

, an d t h e t r i a l c o u r t

en t ered a n ew o rd er i d en t i fy i n g t h e “ l arg e cas e” as t h e “ J o s e Hern an d ez” cas e, an d

req u i ri n g Sm i t h t o pl ace $ 4 3 ,7 50 fro m t h at cas e i n t ru s t wi t h i n 1 0 d a ys o f t h e t i m e

Sm it h recei v ed t h e fu n d s . Th e t ri al co u rt s p eci fi ed t h at t he $ 4 3 ,7 5 0 was th e am o u nt

t h at W i l l i am s cl ai m ed s h e was en t i t l ed t o fro m t he set t lem en t o f t h e earl ier Di s h m an

an d Kel l er cas es

. As S m i t h p o i n t s o u t

, W i l l i am s ’ cl ai m t o h al f t h e fees i n t h e

Hern an dez cas e al read y is pro t ect ed b y th e ori g i n al i n ju n ct i o n

. Th e cl ari fi cat i o n o rd er

wo u l d es s en t i al l y h av e S m it h dep o s i t ad d i t io n al m on ey fro m t h e Hern an d ez cas e,

o n ce i t s et t l es

, i n ord er to p ro t ect W i ll i am s as t o t h e u n rel at ed Di s h m a n a n d K el l er

cas es

. 4

4 T h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er i s

, to a d eg ree, p hi l o so p hi cal l y an al o g ou s t o a

p reju d g m en t at t ach m en t ( OC G A § § 1 8 -3 -1

, 1 8-3 -9

, 1 8 -3 -1 0 ); h o wev er, s u ch

p reju d g m en t act io n s m

u s t m eet cert ai n req u i rem en t s an d o ffer cert ai n s afeg u ard s n ot

9Ho wev er, an ex h i b it at t ach ed t o t h e m o t io n fo r cl ari fi cat io n is an e-m ai l fro m

co u ns el fo r Hern an d ez’ s em p l o y er s t at i n g t h at th e em

p l oy er “ h as el ect ed n o t t o s et t l e

t h e cl ai m at t hi s ju n ct u re.”

Bas ed on t h e i nfo rm at io n b efo re us

, t h ere i s no w ay t o kn o w wh et h er

– o r fo r

wh at am o u n t

– th e Hern an dez cas e wi l l s et t l e. In t h e ev en t t h at i t d o es s et t l e an d,

h y p o t h et ical l y

, res u l t s i n $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 i n at t o rn ey fees rat h er th an t he l arg er am o u n t t h e

t ri al co u rt ap p aren t l y an t i ci pat es

, Sm i t h wo u l d be req u i red t o pl ace h al f o f t h at

$ 5 0 ,0 0 0

, o r $ 2 5 ,0 0 0, i n t ru s t u nd er t h e t er m s of t h e o ri g in al in j u n ct i o n

, an d t h en to

s at i s fy t h e cl ari fi cat i o n o rd er, wo u l d h av e t o p l ace an ad d it i o n al $ 4 3 ,7 5 0

– m o re t h an

t h e am o un t co ll ect ed fro m t h e Hern an d ez cas e –

i n t ru s t as wel l

.

A t ri al co u rt m ay is s u e an i n t erl o cu t o ry i n ju n ct i o n t o m ai n t ai n t h e s tat u s

q u o un t i l th e fi n al h eari n g i f, b y b al an ci n g t h e rel at i ve co n v en i en ces o f

t h e p art i es

, i t d et erm i n es t h at t h ey fav o r t h e part y s eek i ng t h e i n ju n ct i o n

.

Th at i s b ecau s e an i n t erl ocu t o ry i n ju n ct io n i s a d ev i ce t o k eep t he p art i es

i n o rd er t o p rev en t o n e fro m h u rt i n g t h e o t h e r wh il s t t hei r res p ect iv e

ri gh ts are u n d er ad

ju d i cat i o n

. Th ere m

u s t b e s o m e v i t al n eces s i t y fo r th e

i n ju n ct i o n s o t h at o n e o f th e part i es wi l l no t b e d am ag ed an d left wi t h o u t

ad eq u at e rem ed y

.

p res en t h ere.

10(Ci t at i o n o m i t t ed ). A mer i ca n Mg m t

. S vcs

. Ea s t, In c. v. F

o r t B e n n i n g Fa mi l

y

Co mmu n i t i es

, LLC

, 3 1 8 G a. Ap p

. 8 2 7

, 8 3 2 -8 3 3 (3 ) (7 3 4 SE2 d 8 3 3 ) (2 01 2 ). H ere, t h e

m o di fi cat i o n d oes n o t “ m ai n t ai n t h e s t at u s q u o,” an d m ay p u t Sm i t h at ri s k o f i n ju ry

.

Fu rt h er, th ere h as b een n o s ho wi n g t h at W i l l i am s wo u l d b e l eft wi t h o ut an ad eq u at e

r e m e d y ab s en t t h i s m od i fi cat i o n

. Id

. Fi n d i n g erro r, we t h erefo re rev ers e t h e tri al

co u rt ’ s cl ari fi cat i o n o rd er m o d i fy i n g t h e i nju nct i on

.

Ju d g men t a f f ir med i n p a r t ; r ever

s ed i n p a rt

. Ba r n es

, P. J., a n d McMi l l i a n

, J.,

co n cu r

.

11