alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Access to Federal Financial Assistance for Homeless and Foster Youth      

# Report: Access to Federal Financial Assistance for Homeless and Foster Youth

This report highlights obstacles faced by homeless youth and youth who have been in foster care in securing financial aid for college. The report includes six recommendations to improve access to financial assistance for these youth, including centralizing college information and considering legislative proposals to simplify federal requirements.

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-343?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links
U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

2/5/2015 

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11064 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA 

Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket 

No. FAA-2014-0356 

Dear Sir or Madam; 

RC Pro Production Consulting LLC dba Vortex Aerial was issued an Exemption 

numbered 11064 (hereinafter the Exemption) for the purpose of conducting scripted, closed-set 

filming for the motion picture and television industry. RC Pro Production Consulting LLC dba 

Vortex Aerial hereby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow for two (2) additional 

type of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) that fully comply with the conditions of the Exemption. 

RC Pro Production Consulting LLC dba Vortex Aerial wishes to operate the VA04-v1 

Quadcopter, and VA07-v1 Hexacopter under the same terms and conditions contained in the 

Exemption. Attached hereto, and submitted as highly proprietary and confidential 

documents, are the Flight Operations and Procedures Manuals (FOPM) for the two (2) 

additional UAS. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of 

the Exemption. 

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of another 

type of unmanned aerial vehicle, RC Pro Production Consulting LLC dba Vortex Aerial 

respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published 

in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. 

Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning this request 

for an amendment to the Exemption. 

cc: 

James Williams 

Robert Pappas 

Jake Troutman 

John McGraw 

Jonathan B. Hill 

111298720 v1 

Sincerely yours, 

~~~7~~ Christopher~ f S~husi; 

RC Pro Production Consulting LLC 

dba Vortex Aerial 

1930 Oakridge Drive 

Corona Ca 92882 

(714) 916-3614
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 4, 2022

No. 04-22-00293-CR

Jenna K. LEWIS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR191052

Honorable Susan Harris, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief originally was due on August 10, 2022. On August 3, 2022, appellant 

filed a motion requesting a sixty-day extension of time. The motion is GRANTED IN PART 

and DENIED IN PART. Appellant is ORDERED to file his brief no later than September 9, 

2022.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of August, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
§ 1221.113 Financial statements. ( a ) As requested by the Secretary, the Board shall prepare and submit financial statements to the Secretary on a monthly basis. Each such financial statement shall include, but not be limited to, a balance sheet, income statement, and expense budget. The expense budget shall show expenditures during the time period covered by the report, fiscal period-to-date expenditures, and the unexpended budget.
( b ) Each financial statement shall be submitted to the Secretary within 30 days after the end of the time period to which it applies.
( c ) The Board shall submit annually to the Secretary an annual financial statement within 90 days after the end of the fiscal period to which it applies.
#### Naomi Gershberg, Appellant, v Myron Gershberg, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 20, 1978, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, for the reasons stated by Blyn, J., at Special Term. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Evans and Lupiano, JJ.
#### § 1205.327 Vacancies.

To fill any vacancy occasioned by the failure of any person selected as a member or as an alternate member of the Board to qualify, or in the event of death, removal, resignation or disqualification of any member or alternate member of the Board, a successor for the unexpired term of such member or alternate member of the Board shall be nominated and selected in the manner specified in §§ 1205.322, 1205.324 and 1205.325.

[56 FR 64473, Dec. 10, 1991]
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directorsand Stockholders 

Harvard Bioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Numbers 333-53848, 333-104544 and 333-135418 on Form S-8 of HarvardBioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 11, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and our report dated March 11, 2008 with respect to the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. 

Our reports include an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),*Share-Based Payment*, effective January 1, 2006, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans-an amendment of FASB StatementsNo. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)*, effective December 31, 2006, and the Company changed its method of quantifying errors in 2006. 

Our report dated March 11, 2008, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting contains an explanatory paragraph that states that Harvard Bioscience, Inc. acquired Panlab s.l. (“Panlab”) during 2007, andmanagement excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, Panlab’s internal control over financial reportingassociated with total assets of $11,895,236 and total revenues of $2,939,872 included in the consolidated financial statements of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries’ as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Our audit ofinternal control over financial reporting of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Panlab. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 12, 2008
#### § 1214.100 General.

Referenda to determine whether eligible domestic producers and importers of Christmas trees favor the continuance, amendment, suspension, or termination of the Christmas Tree Promotion, Research, and Information Order shall be conducted in accordance with this subpart.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

(Principal Financial Officer)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chaparral Steel Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, J. Celtyn Hughes, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                             
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: October 14, 2005 |  |  |  |                                             
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | /s/    J. CELTYN HUGHES                     
|                       |  |  |  | J. Celtyn Hughes Principal Financial Officer
MBUAPCD

SIP Completeness Checklist 1 

### MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

RULE NUMBER: 903 DATE AMENDED: 4/20/05

REGULATION TITLE: Inspection of Public Records - Disclosure Procedure

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Attached/Not Attached*

X COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE. If amended rule, indicate changes in underline and strikeout format, compared to existing approved SIP version.

X REFERENCE TO OTHER RULES. If the rule contains a reference

to any other rule, attach a copy of that other rule unless it has already been submitted to EPA as a part of a previous SIP submittal.

X PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE. Include a copy of the newspaper clipping certification with date of publication. Include a copy of notice from each newspaper.

X RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER. Must include Board Clerk certification that hearing was held in accordance with information in the public notice; must also include list of rules adopted or amended, dat e of public hearing, and statement of compliance with H&SC Sections 40725-40728 [Administrative Procedures Act].

X PUB LIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Any written comments submitted to the District during pubic notice period or at the hearing; also include any written responses prepared by the District as normal District procedure.MBUAPCD

SIP Completeness Checklist 2 OTHER INFORMATION

Attached/Not Attached

X MODELING SUPPORT. Provide as appropriate; not required for

VOC and NOx rules; required where rule is a relaxation in an attainment

area for SO2, PM10, CO, or NOx [for NO2 purposes]; for relaxation or shift of emissions in nonattainment area for SO2, PM10, CO, and NOx, give reference to the approved SIP.

X ECONOMIC/TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DE VIATIONS

FROM EPA POLICIES: As appropriate, describe special circumstances, i.e., where alternative RACT is used, extended compliance dates included, etc.**

X ADDITIONAL MATERIALS: Any other supporting information, such as staff reports , which are included with the rule package but not specifically required in the checklist above.

------------- * Attached separate sheet for each rule explaining why any materials are not included and when they will be submitted to the ARB.

** Completed enforcement checklist will fulfill this requirement.
2012-SW-022-AD NPRM Costs of Compliance

We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 102 helicopters of U.S. Registry.

Based on an average labor rate of $85 per hour, we estimate that operators may incur the 

following costs in order to comply with this proposed AD. 

Performing the operational checks of the hydraulic systems would require about 2 

work-hours for a total cost per helicopter of $170 and a total cost to U.S. operators of 

$17,340. 

Replacing a PCM would require about 3 work-hours and required parts would 

cost about $87,136, for a cost per helicopter of $87,391.

Replacing a tail or flight control shut-off valve would require about 2 work-hours, 

and required parts would cost about $7,512, for a cost per helicopter of $7,682.

Replacing the number 2 hydraulic control panel would require about 2 workhours, and required parts would cost about $8,165, for a cost per helicopter of $8,335.

Replacing the number 1 hydraulic module would require about 4 work-hours, and 

required parts would cost about $87,137, for a cost per helicopter of $87,477.

Replacing a PCM pressure switch would require about 2 work-hours, and required 

parts would cost about $6,974, for a cost per helicopter of $7,144.

Repairing the electrical wiring would require about 2 work-hours, and required 

parts would cost about $45, for a cost per helicopter of $215.
##### 



Exhibit 31-7 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, Oliver D. Kingsley Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Exelon Generation
Company, LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: July 28, 2004
    
    /s/ Oliver D. Kingsley Jr.Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Federal Register: May 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 86)]
[Notices]               
[Page 24568-24569]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05my10-38]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

 
Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 24569]]

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
Renewable Organics, LLC of Pinehurst, North Carolina, an exclusive 
license to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 12/026,346, ``Process for 
Removing and Recovering Phosphorus from Animal Waste,'' filed on 
February 5, 2008.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 4, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Renewable Organics, LLC of 
Pinehurst, North Carolina has submitted a complete and sufficient 
application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be 
royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be 
granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published 
Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-10557 Filed 5-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
#### In re: PEI TI TUNG, Debtor. Cheng-Lu Hsieh, Appellant, v. Pei Ti Tung, Appellee.

No. 06-35236.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 16, 2007.

Filed Nov. 2, 2007.

Shun C. Chen, Esq., Law Offices of Shun C. Chen, Irvine, CA, for Appellant.

Martin E. Snodgrass, Esq., Snodgrass *&*Warren Inc., Everett, WA, for Appellee.

Before: B. FLETCHER, BEAM *, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable C. Arlen Beam, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Debtor, Pei Ti Tung, filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington on June 4, 2002. Cheng-Lu Hsieh timely brought an adversary proceeding asserting the nondischargeability of her claim against Tung pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), an exception in the Bankruptcy Code that prevents the discharge of debts resulting from fraud. Specifically, Hsieh contended that she invested $300,000 with Tung in a business venture based on Tung’s fraudulent misrepresentations, and sought a nondischargeable judgment for that same amount. After five days of trial, the bankruptcy court ruled in favor of Tung, find*651ing that Hsieh had not met her burden of proving fraud. Hsieh appealed to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP), which affirmed. The BAP noted that the bankruptcy court’s ruling rested largely upon its credibility determinations concerning matters of fact. The BAP found no clear error in these findings. Hsieh appeals, and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d).

When reviewing a decision of the BAP, we independently review the bankruptcy court’s decision, “reviewing any conclusions of law de novo, while reviewing findings of fact for clear error.” *In re Reynoso, 477*F.3d 1117, 1120 (9th Cir.2007). We accept the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact unless we are left with the definite and firm conviction that the bankruptcy judge has committed a mistake. *Latman v. Burdette,*366 F.3d 774, 781 (9th Cir.2004). Whether a creditor relied upon false statements is a question of fact, as are the issues of intent to defraud, proximate causation of damages, and the materiality of the alleged fraud. *In re Candland,*90 F.3d 1466, 1469 (9th Cir.1996).

We have reviewed the record and find no clear error in the bankruptcy court’s factual findings and credibility determinations. Nor did the bankruptcy court err in reaching its legal conclusions. Accordingly, Hsieh’s contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.