alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: A First Look: Students’ Access to Educational Opportunities in the Nation’s Public Schools      

# Report: A First Look: Students’ Access to Educational Opportunities in the Nation’s Public Schools

This report (PDF, 29 pages) provides an overview of data from the 2020–21 Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) on these topics: 
                  -  Student enrollment in dual enrollment or dual credit programs  
                  -  Access to preschool programs  
                  -  Access to mathematics, science, and computer science courses and other programs  
                  -  Access to internet and devices  
                  -  Teachers and school support staff  
                  -  School climate and safety  

**Learn more** (PDF, 29 pages).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  Form 10- QSB for the quarter  ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                    APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                               74,866
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       602,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         40,000
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  1,525,318
<PP&E>                                                            6,087,013
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    3,853,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                            0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             2,420,468
<BONDS>                                                           6,216,869
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                             33,089
<OTHER-SE>                                                       (4,022,502)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      4,912,493
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  2,009,516
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  1,867,293
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  141,484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         339
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         17,776
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                           (17,437)
<NET-INCOME>                                                              0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         (0.01)


</TABLE>
#### Leo Halper, appellee, v. Maytag-Chicago Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 34,469.

Opinion filed April 15, 1931.

Emmet J. Cleary, for appellant.

Aaron Soble, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Hebei

delivered the opinion of the court.
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1159 

AN ACT 

To amend the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 to require 

periodic reviews and updated reports relating to the Department of State’s Taiwan Guidelines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1159 EH

1 SECTION 1. PERIODIC REVIEWS AND UPDATED REPORTS 

2 OF THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE’S TAIWAN 

3 GUIDELINES UNDER THE TAIWAN ASSUR4 ANCE ACT OF 2020. 

5 Section 315 of the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 

6 (Public Law 116–260; 134 Stat. 3100) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (c)(1), by adding at the end 

8 before ‘‘; and’’ the following: ‘‘and any successor 

9 document or related document disseminating such 

10 guidance’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(d) PERIODIC REVIEWS AND UPDATED REPORTS.— 

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For as long as the Depart14 ment of State’s guidance that governs relations with 

15 Taiwan described in subsection (a) remains in effect, 

16 the Secretary of State shall conduct periodic reviews 

17 as described in subsection (a) and submit updated 

18 reports as described in subsection (c) not less fre19 quently than every two years following the submis20 sion of the initial report described in subsection (c). 

21 ‘‘(2) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED.—Such up22 dated reports shall include— 

23 ‘‘(A) a description of how the guidance 

24 meets the goals and objectives described in 

25 paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (b); 

26 and 
3 

•HR 1159 EH

1 ‘‘(B) an identification of opportunities and 

2 plans to lift self-imposed restrictions on rela3 tions with Taiwan.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 22, 

2023. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1159 

AN ACT 

To amend the Taiwan Assurance Act of 2020 to relines. ing to the Department of State’s Taiwan Guide- quire periodic reviews and updated reports relat-
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# OJJDP’s Statistical Briefing Book - 2012

The Department of Justice’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention has updated the “frequently asked questions” section of its Statistical Briefing Book. This section provides answers to some commonly asked questions about juvenile justice

http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/faqs.html
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Community Financial Shares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K Amendment 1 for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott W. Hamer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Scott W. Hamer, CFO
|Scott W. Hamer         
|Chief Financial Officer
|July 21, 2005
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amecs Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Alexei Gavriline, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 6th day of November, 2006.



| | ALEXEI GAVRILINE                                   
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Alexei Gavriline                                   
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer























---
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Albert Paulo, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

This appeal from a judgment dismissmg a writ of habeas corpus is predicated upon relator’s contention that the jury upon his trial m 1943 for felony returned to the courtroom for, and presumably were given, additional mstruetions, E his absence. (¡See Code Grim. Pro., §§ 356, 427.) The clerk’s minutes indicate only that the jury “ returned to the Court Room at 12:14 p.m. and asked for further mstruetions from the Court” and that the jury “agam retired at 12:20 p.m.” There is no evidence of what, if anything, transpired in the six-mmute mterval unless probative force be given a newspaper article offered by the Deputy Attorney-General appearmg for the respondent warden which indicated that the jury asked for and was refused a document not m evidence. The minutes kept by the Judge presiding at the trial contam no reference to the jury’s return or to any instructions. The stenographic ndnutes of the trial were obtained for use upon defendant’s appeal but are said to have *724been lost. The whereabouts of the stenographer are not known. Assuming *arguendo*that there was sufficient evidence to indicate that instructions of some sort were given, it does not necessarily follow from the proof that defendant was absent or that the statute was otherwise violated. The clerk’s minutes do not purport to show the presence of the relator and his codefendants at many of the sessions of the five-day trial, although coneededly they were there; and the clerk testified that at that time he was not accustomed to noting the presence of a defendant or of counsel except in murder trials. In this ease no appearances were noted as such and there is no indication of defendant’s presence except at the opening of the trial and again when he testified. Consequently, we give no evidentiary effect to the omission from the minutes of any reference to defendant’s presence when and if the jury returned for instructions; and we find that the other evidence from which his absence might be inferred is outweighed by the abundance of proof, adduced from a number of responsible witnesses, of the “ invariable practice ” of the Judge, and of the District Attorney and court clerk as well, to make certain that the defendant was in the courtroom before the jury was brought in. *(People*v. *Boehm,*285 App. Div. 245, affd. 309 N. Y. 362; *People ex rel. Shapiro*v. *La Vallee,*18 A D 2d 950, mot. for Iv. to app. den. 12 N Y 2d 649, app. dsmd. 12 N Y 2d 1109, cert. den. 375 U. S. 886; *People*v. *Bean,*284 App. Div. 922, cert. den. 348 U. S. 974.) Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ, concur.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of 4C Controls Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
      quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald Sullivan, Principal Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
      that:





(1) 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      August 18, 2008






By:
            /s/
                Gerald SullivanName:   
                Gerald SullivanTitle:     
                Principal Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00084-CR

Oscar GOMEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR11049

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2015

DISMISSED

On February 24, 2015, we notified the appellant that the trial court’s certification in this 

appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of 

appeal.” Additionally, the clerk’s record contains a written waiver signed by the appellant 

pursuant to which he entered a plea of nolo contendere. The trial court’s judgment also reflects 

that the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and 

agreed to by the defendant. Therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that this 

criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
04-15-00084-CR

In our February 24, 2015 order, we warned the appellant that “[this] appeal must be 

dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part 

of the record under these rules.” See id. R. 25.2(d). We ordered that this appeal would be 

dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless the appellant caused an amended trial court certification 

to be filed by March 26, 2015 that showed the appellant has the right of appeal. See id. R. 25.2(d), 

37.1; see also Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Daniels v. State, 110 

S.W.3d 174, 176 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). No response was filed. Accordingly, 

we dismiss this appeal.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

- 2 -
Nicor Inc.
 Form 8-K
 Exhibit 10.03
 
 
 AMENDMENT TO


CHANGE-IN-CONTROL AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into by and between Nicor Inc. (the “Company”), an Illinois corporation, and _______________ (the “Executive”) effective this 8th day of November, 2011.




Executive and the Company have entered into an Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Agreement dated __________ (the “CIC Agreement”).  The Company and Executive mutually desire to amend the CIC Agreement.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the CIC Agreement is hereby amended as follows:




1.           By substituting the following for Section 5.1.6 of the CIC Agreement:




“5.1.6           If the Executive is eligible to participate in the Company’s nonqualified supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”) (regardless of whether the Executive actually participates or previously participated in the SERP on the Termination Date) then on the Termination Date, the amount payable under subsection 5.1.1.3 of this Agreement shall be taken into account for purposes of determining the amount of benefits to which the Executive is entitled under the SERP, including if Executive was not a participant in the SERP in creating a benefit under the SERP; provided that such amount shall be taken into account as though it was earned equally over the Severance Period, and further provided that the Executive shall be deemed to have attained the age he or she would have attained as of the last day of the Severance Period, and completed the number of years of service he or she would have completed as of the last day of the Severance Period.  The Severance Period shall be taken into account for purposes of determining the amount of and eligibility to begin to receive benefits under the SERP.”




2.           By substituting the following for Section 5.1.7 of the CIC Agreement:




“5.1.7           If the Executive is eligible to participate in the Company’s nonqualified Supplemental Senior Officer Retirement Plan (“SSORP”) (regardless of whether the Executive actually participates or previously participated in the SSORP on the Termination Date), then (i) on the Termination Date the Executive shall become fully vested in all contributions (and in any earnings applied to such contributions) made by the Company on behalf of the Executive under the SSORP or any successor plan, if applicable, and (ii) the Company shall pay to the Executive, within five business days of the Payment Date, an amount equal to the product of (x) the Annual Deferral Percentage (as defined in the SSORP) used for the most recently completed SSORP Plan Year, times (y) the amount payable under subsection 5.1.1.3 of this Agreement.”




In all other respects the CIC Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Company have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.







[Executive’s Name]











Nicor Inc.





By:       /s/ Claudia Colalillo


Claudia Colalillo


SVP Human Resources and Corporate Communications
#### § 1032.4 Plant.

See § 1000.4.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Transportation
International Holdings Group Limited (the “Company”) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), Caichun Wen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 22, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Caichun
      WenName:
      Caichun WenTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)