alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Bureau of Land Management Youth Initiatives      

# Bureau of Land Management Youth Initiatives

This site describes looking to the future, The Bureau of Land Management's youth initiatives. These initiatives feature a variety of programs that engage, educate, and inspire and focus on youth from early childhood through young adulthood. The aim of the youth programs is to build on the spark of childhood wonder about the natural world, sustain interest through hands-on education and volunteer experiences during the school-age years, and develop into long-term engagement and stewardship, as well as pursuit of natural resource careers.

http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/more/blms__youth_initiatives.html
PROGRESSIVE EMPLOYER 

SERVICES VI LLC,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC 

OPPORTUNITY c/o 

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3288

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 10, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Department of Economic Opportunity.

Brian M. Nugent of Holland & Hart LLP, Denver, CO, for Appellant.

Christina Arzillo Shideler, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Economic 

Opportunity, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, THOMAS, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
950.7003 Nuclear hazards indemnity. ( a ) Section 170d. of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended, requires DOE “to enter into agreements of indemnification with any person who may conduct activities under a contract with DOE that involve the risk of public liability * * *.” However, DOE contractors whose activities are already subject to indemnification by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission are not eligible for such statutory indemnity. See 950.7006 below.
( b ) The Heads of Contracting Activities shall assure that contracts subject to this requirement contain the appropriate nuclear hazards indemnity provisions.
[56 FR 57828, Nov. 14, 1991, as amended at 59 FR 9108, Feb. 25, 1994; 75 FR 29459, May 26, 2010]
STATE OF MICHIGAN 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

LANSING 

DE~ RICK SNYDER 

GOVERNOR 

May 30,2013 

Dr. Susan Hedman, Regional Administrator 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 5 

77 West Jackson Boulevard (R-19J) 

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590 

Dear Dr. Hedman: 

DAN WYANT 

DIRECTOR 

Through this letter, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) is 

withdrawing Michigan's attainment plan for the 1997 fine particulate (PM2.

5) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard as a proposed revision to the Michigan State 

Implementation Plan. This attainment plan was submitted to the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) on May 15, 2008. 

The seven-county PM2.5 non attainment area in Southeast Michigan has attained both 

the 1997 PM2.5 annual standards and the 2006 PM2.5dailystandards with ambient 

monitoring data for 2007-2010 showing design values below the nonattainment 

thresholds. The Southeast Michigan region continues to maintain compliance with these 

standards, and a determination of clean data was made by the USEPA in November 

2012. We urge the USEPA to expeditiously review and propose approval of Michigan's 

request for redesignation to attainment, which has been pending since July 5, 2011. 

Please direct any questions regarding the withdrawal of the MDEQ's PM2.5 plan and the 

pending PM2.5 redesignation to Mr. G. Vinson Hellwig, Chief, Air Quality Division, at 

517-373-7069; hellwigv@michigan.gov; or MDEQ, P.O. Box 30260, Lansing, Michigan 

48909-7760; or you may contact me. 

cc: Mr. Douglas Aburano, USEPA, Region 5 

Mr. Jim Sygo, Deputy Director, MDEQ 

Mr. G. Vinson Hellwig, MDEQ 

Ms. Mary Maupin, MDEQ 

CONSTITUTION HALL • 525 WEST ALLEGAN STREET • P.O. BOX 30473 • lANSING, MICHIGAN 48909-7973 

www.mlchlgan.gov/deq • {800) 662-9278
!"c$

!"c$

?3⁄4

A

g

u

a

F r i a

R i v

e r

Tonto National Forest

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Area

BLACK CANYON CITY

CORDES

JUNCTION

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: Land Status legend located

on Map 1-1

Note: The Bureau of Land Management

(BLM) conducts land use planning only

in the areas administered by BLM. BLM

has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation

of the State of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by

BLM, or to the accuracy, reliability or

completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National

Map Accuracy Standards. This information

may be updated without notification.

±

Map 2-3

Agua Fria

National Monument

Utility & Transportation

Corridors and

Communication Sites

Alternative A

Current Management

0 1 2

Miles

Interstate

Highway

Agua Fria

National Monument

Planning Area

Major Road

Minor Road

Major River, Streams or

Wash

Utility & Transportation

Corridor

Multi-use Corridor within

Agua Fria National

Monument

No Communication Sites are

present on Agua Fria National

Monument
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           IACP Launches Online Training Series on Juvenile Interviewing and Interrogation      

# IACP Launches Online Training Series on Juvenile Interviewing and Interrogation

The International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), in collaboration with OJJDP, developed a free, online training series about effective juvenile interviewing and interrogation techniques. The series target law enforcement and legally authorized juvenile justice professionals who interview or interrogate youth. 

http://elearning-courses.net/iacp/?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
#### 970.5242-1 Penalties for unallowable costs.

As prescribed in 970.4207-03-70, insert the following clause:

# Penalties for Unallowable Costs (AUG 2009)

(a) Contractors which include unallowable cost in a submission for settlement for cost incurred, may be subject to penalties.

(b) If, during the review of a submission for settlement of cost incurred, the Contracting Officer determines that the submission contains an expressly unallowable cost or a cost determined to be unallowable prior to the submission, the Contracting Officer shall assess a penalty.

(c) Unallowable costs are either expressly unallowable or determined unallowable.

(1) An expressly unallowable cost is a particular item or type of cost which, under the express provisions of an applicable law, regulation, or this contract, is specifically named and stated to be unallowable.

(2) A cost determined unallowable is one which, for that Contractor—

(i) Was subject to a Contracting Officer's final decision and not appealed;

(ii) The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals or a court has previously ruled as unallowable; or

(iii) Was mutually agreed to be unallowable.

(d) If the Contracting Officer determines that a cost submitted by the Contractor in its submission for settlement of cost incurred is—

(1) Expressly unallowable, then the Contracting Officer shall assess a penalty in an amount equal to the disallowed cost allocated to this contract plus interest on the paid portion of the disallowed cost. Interest shall be computed from the date of overpayment to the date of repayment using the interest rate specified by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Pub. L. 92-41 (85 Stat. 97); or

(2) Determined unallowable, then the Contracting Officer shall assess a penalty in an amount equal to two times the amount of the disallowed cost allocated to this contract.

(e) The Contracting Officer may waive the penalty provisions when—

(1) The Contractor withdraws the submission before the formal initiation of an audit of the submission and submits a revised submission;

(2) The amount of the unallowable costs allocated to covered contracts is $10,000 or less; or

(3) The Contractor demonstrates to the Contracting Officer's satisfaction that—

(i) It has established appropriate policies, personnel training, and an internal control and review system that provides assurances that unallowable costs subject to penalties are precluded from the Contractor's submission for settlement of costs; and

(ii) The unallowable costs subject to the penalty were inadvertently incorporated into the submission.

(End of clause)

[74 FR 36376, July 22, 2009]
<PAGE>

                               EXHIBIT 32.2 CFO CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smart SMS Corp. (the "COMPANY") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Gordon F. Lee, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/ GORDON F. LEE
-----------------------
GORDON F. LEE
Chief Financial Officer

April 27, 2006
*

The Honorable Thomas M. Shanahan, United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2960

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Nebraska.

*

Dale M. Brown, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 22, 2005

Filed: April 27, 2005

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dale M. Brown appeals the sentence the district court*

 imposed after Brown

pleaded guilty to drug and forfeiture charges. Under a Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement, the court sentenced Brown to 108 months in

prison and 4 years supervised release, and ordered forfeiture of $2,306. Brown’s

counsel moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), arguing Brown’s sentence was imposed in violation of his Sixth Amendment

rights, and the currency seized from Brown’s residence should not have been forfeited
-2-

or taken into account in calculating drug quantity. Brown filed a supplemental brief

contending that defense counsel was ineffective.

These arguments fail. First, Brown cannot properly challenge, under United

States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), or otherwise, the sentence to which he

stipulated in his Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement because he voluntarily exposed

himself to a specific punishment. See 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(3), (c); United States v.

Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1995). Second, Brown voluntarily, knowingly,

and intelligently pleaded guilty to the forfeiture count and thus agreed to forfeit the

money. See Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 74 (1977); United States v.

Martinez-Cruz, 186 F.3d 1102, 1104 (8th Cir. 1999). Finally, Brown’s

ineffective-assistance claim should be deferred to proceedings under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 in which an appropriate record may be developed. See United States v.

Hughes, 330 F.3d 1068, 1069 (8th Cir. 2003). 

Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), and finding no nonfrivolous issues, we affirm the district court. We also

grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

No. 04-15-00181-CR

Genevieve Marie PANTOJA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR4434

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On May 4, 2015, appellant’s appointed counsel, Richard B. Dulany Jr. of the Bexar 

County Public Defender’s Office, moved to withdraw as appellate counsel due to a conflict of 

interest. We agree there is an existing conflict and therefore GRANT counsel’s motion. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Because appellant is indigent, new appellate counsel must be appointed. 

Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal ABATED and REMANDED to the trial court for

action in accordance with this order. We ORDER the trial court to appoint new appellate 

counsel on or before May 15, 2015. See Duncan v. State, 653 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1983) (holding that appellate courts may abate appeals so that trial court can assure appellant has 

effective assistance of counsel). The trial court is advised that no attorney from the Bexar 

County Public Defender’s Office should be appointed to represent appellant due to the existing 

conflict. We further ORDER the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the trial court’s order appointing new appellate counsel in this court on or before May 

25, 2015. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court, the district 

clerk, the court reporter, and all counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18

U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Encore
Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify to the best of their knowledge with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with all requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.



| |  |                |  |                                                                                   
| |  | -------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | August 6, 2009 |  | /s/ James S. DAgostino, Jr.                                                      
| |  | (Date)         |  | James S. DAgostino, Jr., Chief Executive Officer                                 
| |  |               
| |  | August 6, 2009 |  | /s/ L. Anderson Creel                                                             
| |  | (Date)         |  | L. Anderson Creel, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
American Ammunition, Inc.
File No. 0-32379


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  American  Ammunition,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form  10-KSB/A for the year ended  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Andres F.  Fernandez,  Chief  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: October 30, 2007    By:  /s/ Andres F. Fernandez
      ------------------      -------------------------
                              Andres F. Fernandez
                              Chief Executive and
                              Chief Financial Officer





-------------------
A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  American  Ammunition,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  American
Ammunition,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Neshen Mitchell, Individually and as the next friend of 

her minor child, Hakeem T.M., Petitioners, 

v. 

Juan Marruffo, d/b/a Liberty Express, Adrian Moralez, 

RET Partnership, William T. McQueeney, Carl E. 

Roberts, Karl R. Henderson, and Steven Parham, 

Defendants, 

Of whom RET Partnership, William T. McQueeney, Carl 

E. Roberts, Karl R. Henderson, and Steven Parham are 

the, Respondents. 

Appellate Case No. 2013-000670 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS 

Appeal from Charleston County 

Roger M. Young, Sr., Circuit Court Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2015-MO-010 

Heard February 4, 2015 – Filed March 4, 2015 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED 
Richard S. Rosen and Andrew D. Gowdown, both of 

Rosen, Rosen & Hagood, LLC, of Charleston, and J. 

Joseph Condon, Jr., of North Charleston, for Petitioners. 

Samuel R. Clawson, Timothy A. Domin, and Christina R. 

Fargnoli, all of Clawson and Staubes, LLC, of 

Charleston, for Respondents. 

PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in 

Mitchell v. Marruffo, Op. No. 2013-UP-010 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Jan. 9, 2013). We 

now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. 

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., 

concur.
SHAWN RANDOLPH

FOWLER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 2792

__ ___________________________/

Opinion filed September 5, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. J. Bradford Stetson , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Archie F. Gardner, Jr., Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appel lant; Shawn Randolph Fowler, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., CONCUR.
#### § 1210.500 Terms defined.

Unless otherwise defined in this subpart, definitions of terms used in this subpart shall have the same meaning as the definitions of such terms which appear in subpart—Watermelon Research and Promotion Plan.