alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Reintegration, Supervised Release, and Intensive Aftercare      

# Reintegration, Supervised Release, and Intensive Aftercare

This Bulletin provides results from expermental analyses of the Intensive Aftercare Program in four sites.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/175715.pdf
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

IN RE: : NO. 600 

ORDER ADOPTING RULES 104, 105, JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET 

106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 

114, AND 115 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA 

RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 311 day of November, 2023, upon the recommendation of the Civil 

Procedural Rules Committee, the proposal having been published for public comment at 

51 Pa.B. 5532 ( September 4, 2021): 

It is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania 

that Rules 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, and 115 of the 

Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial Administration are adopted in the attached form. 

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. 103(b), and shall be 

effective on January 1, 2024.
#### § 1207.344 Operating reserve.

The Board may establish an operating monetary reserve and may carry over to subsequent fiscal periods excess funds in a reserve so established: *Provided,* That funds in the reserve shall not exceed approximately two fiscal periods' expenses. Such reserve funds may be used to defray any expenses authorized under this part.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joe Watson, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 21, *7561966, reversed, on the law; and motion in the nature of *coram nobis*granted to the extent that it is directed that a hearing be held on the issues raised. The proceeding is remitted to the court below for the purpose of holding such hearing; and it is directed that the hearing be held before a Justice other than the one who presided at the sentencing. No questions of fact were considered. The factual allegations are sufficient on their face to require a hearing *(People*v. *Elfe,*18 N Y 2d 601). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
GREATER HNfiESBuRG. M!SSIS~ii 'f'i 

May 16,2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

, , 7 > ' - H /" \ (-

~ · \l! :_ r·- .· .. ·i~ ~; ~. -~· (J :(':· 

·- ' - .• ' I • ; ;: • . l 

... ...... , . ,, .. ,, 

Reference: DOT -OST -2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, 2000~ 7856 

Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS, Tupelo, MS and Muscle Shoals, AL EAS 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

I am President of the Area Development Partnership (ADP) in Greater Hattiesburg, MS. With 

approximately 875 members, our organization is the regional chamber of commerce, community 

development, and economic development agency representing the three county metro area encompassing 

Forrest, Lamar, and Perry counties. Our organization supports the proposal of Silver Airways to provide 

essential air service at Hattiesburg-Laurel (Pill), MS as replacement for the current Delta Air Lines 

service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air transportation 

system is critical to the economic well-being of Greater Hattiesburg and our members. Many Pine Belt 

residents rely on our local air service for both business and leisure travel. Also, having local air service is 

a huge plus in trying to recruit companies from around the world. Communities without local air service 

find it more cumbersome to compete for new jobs and capital investment that are so desperately needed in 

today's economy. 

The Silver Airways proposal offers us a modern 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, which is 

not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure travel destination from 

Hattiesburg-Laurel, MS in its own right. Daily flights to Atlanta should be considerably more popular 

than flights to Memphis with a stop in Greenville, MS. The Silver air service proposal represents the best 

option for retaining our local air service long tenn and building up traffic so that government subsidies 

can eventually be reduced or eliminated. 

We urge the Department ofTransportation to award Silver Airways the designation to provide 

Hattiesburg-Laurel (Pffi), MS essential air service. It will help tremendously as we strive to enhance the 

region's economy and offer suitable travel options for Pine Belt residents. If you have any questions, feel 

free to contact me directly at (601) 296-7513. Thanks so much for your time and consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Chad E. Newell 

President 

One Convention Center Plaza 1 Hattiesburg, MS 39401 1 p 60~ .296.7500 I f 601 .296.7505 I www.theodp.com
#### Betty Silberstein et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Respondent, Bernard Jacobowitz, Appellant-Respondent, and Sinai Eizikovitz et al., Respondents-Appellants.

[776 NYS2d 520]

In an action to recover damages for *693personal injuries, etc., the defendant Bernard Jacobowitz appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Knipel, J.), dated June 5, 2003, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him, and the defendants Sinai Eizikovitz and Esther Eizikovitz cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The movants failed to meet their prima facie burdens of demonstrating that they did not create the defect in the sidewalk upon which the plaintiff Betty Silberstein allegedly tripped and fell *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *Kreimer v Rockefeller*Group, 2 AD3d 407 [2003]). Accordingly, the motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against the movants were properly denied. Florio, J.P., Townes, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
RELATED FORM 10-Q FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000352049
<NAME> THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,903,177
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    482,078
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         240,625
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       946,418
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,572,298
<COMMON>                                       195,687
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      602,113
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             18,995
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 816,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,690
<PREFERRED>                                    210,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,121,783
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              85,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   67,800
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        1,665
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     41,303
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                33,367
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,192,895
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,572,298
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      439,204
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            17,992
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     352,778
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     370,770
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         68,434
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  33
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  68,467
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        46,511
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,956
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      8,405
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   13,551
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       80,836
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          98,792
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
9904.404-63 Effective date. ( a ) This Standard is effective April 15, 1996.
( b ) This Standard shall be applied beginning with the contractor's next full cost accounting period beginning after the receipt of a contract or subcontract to which this Standard is applicable.
( c ) Contractors with prior CAS-covered contracts with full coverage shall continue to follow Standard 9904.404 in effect prior to April 15, 1996, until this Standard, effective April 15, 1996, becomes applicable after the receipt of a contract or subcontract to which this revised Standard applies.
[61 FR 5523, Feb. 13, 1996]
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Warner Music Group Corp., certifythat: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Warner Music Group Corp. (the “Registrant”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; and 

 

b) Evaluated the effectivenessof the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

 

5. TheRegistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: February 14, 2006
PHANTOM 2 Kits Release Note

©2014 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved 

Date : February 21 , 2014 

PHANTOM 2 FPV HUB Kit Instruction : V1.1 

PHANTOM 2 Prop Guard Attachment Instructions : V1.00 

PHANTOM 2 Car Charger Instruction: V1.0 

February 21, 2014 PHANTOM 2 Car Charger released 

DJI Phantom 2 car charger has been released to provide outdoor charging solutions for the PHANTOM 2 battery. 

PHANTOM 2 Car Charger 

In the kit Car charger and instructions 

Function Used to charge the PHANTOM 2 in-car or through 3S-6S Li-Po batteries. 

Feature Convenient, practical outdoor charging solutions for the PHANTOM 2 battery. 

FPV Hub Kit Instruction has released V1.1 

FPV Hub Kit Instruction V1.1 has added description of using FPV Hub to connect the H3-2D gimbal, GCU and other 

devices on non-PHANTOM 2 flight platforms.
PHANTOM 2 Kits Release Note

©2014 DJI Innovations. All Rights Reserved 

Date : January 24, 2014 

PHANTOM 2 FPV HUB Kit Instruction : V1.0 

PHANTOM 2 Prop Guard Attachment Instructions : V1.00 

January 24, 2014 PHANTOM 2 kits 

The following kits have been released for the DJI Phantom 2. 

PHANTOM 2 FPV HUB 

In the kit FPV HUB, cables and instructions 

Function Customized ports and cables for iOSD mini, iOSD Mark II or AVL58.

Feature 

FPV HUB’s integrated iOSD miniͫiOSD Mark II or AVL58 ports, connecting directly to the PHANTOM 2 

central board and built-in main controller through an 8-Pin cable. This simplifies connecting these items 

and eliminates the need for soldering. 

PHANTOM 2 Camera Mounting Bracket 

In the kit Camera mounting bracket and screws 

Function Attachment for GoPro cameras and others.

Feature Gimbal free camera attachment for GoPro and similar cameras. 

PHANTOM 2 Prop Guard 

In the kit 4 prop guards and instructions 

Function Fitted under the rotors to prevent damage to rotors or surroundings. 

Feature Easy to attach, lightweight, safe and reliable. 

 

Important Notes: 

1. Make sure the PHANTOM 2 weighs no more than 1350g after mounting prop guards. Any extra weight will 

compromise flight capabilities causing a safety risk. The total weight of a PHANTOM 2 with H3-2D gimbal, iOSD and 

wireless video transmitter will be over 1300g, prop guards are not recommended for similarly equipped PHANTOM 2s.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v Ronald Frank, Defendant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted on the grounds that the defendant has absconded and his whereabouts are unknown. (See *People v Del Rio,*14 NY2d 165; *People ex rel. Mallin [Beauchene] v Kuh,*38 NY2d 982; *People v Casiel,*33 NY2d 791.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Bloom, Lane and Silverman, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael W. DoslandMichael W. DoslandSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1214.108 OMB control number.

The control number assigned to the information collection requirement in this subpart by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 is OMB control number 0581-0267.
#### Carolyn Perlman, Respondent, v. Jacob Bassuk et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action to partition certain real property, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 1, 1964, which granted plaintiff's motion for the appointment of a temporary receiver of the subject property, pursuant to CPLR 6401. Upon -the stipulation of the parties dated October 27, 1964, settling and discontinuing the action, and upon the order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 28, 1964, entered on such stipulation, the appeal is discontinued, without costs. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
§ 1206.42 Assessments. ( a ) The funds to cover the Board's expenses shall be paid from assessments on first handlers and importers, donations from any person not subject to assessments under this Order, and other funds available to the Board and subject to the limitations contained therein.
( b ) *Assessment rate.* The assessment rate on mangos shall be three quarters of a cent ($0.0075) per pound (or $0.0165 per kg). The assessment rates will be reviewed periodically and may be modified by the Board with the approval of the Department.
( c ) *Domestic mangos.* First handlers of domestic mangos are required to pay assessments on all mangos handled for the U.S. market. This includes mangos of the first handler's own production.
( d ) *Imported mangos.* Each importer of mangos shall pay an assessment to the Board through Customs on mangos imported for marketing in the United States. ( 1 ) The import assessment shall be uniformly applied to imported mangos that are identified by the numbers in the 0804.50.4045, 0804.50.4055, 0804.50.6045, and 0804.50.6055 Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) of the United States and shall be the same or equivalent to the rate of mangos produced in the United States.
( 2 ) In the event that any HTS number subject to assessment is changed and such change is merely a replacement of a previous number and has no impact on the description of mangos, assessments will continue to be collected based on the new numbers.
( 3 ) The assessments due on imported mangos shall be paid when they enter or are withdrawn for consumption in the United States.
( e ) Each person responsible for remitting assessments under paragraph (c) of this section shall remit the amounts due to the Board's office on a monthly basis no later than the fifteenth day of the month following the month in which the mangos were marketed, in such manner as prescribed by the Board.
( f ) A late payment charge shall be imposed on any person failing to remit to the Board the total amount for which the person is liable by the payment due date established under this section. The amount of the late payment charge shall be prescribed by the Department.
( g ) An additional charge shall be imposed on any person subject to a late payment charge in the form of interest on the outstanding portion of any amount for which the person is liable. The rate of interest shall be prescribed by the Department.
( h ) Persons failing to remit total assessments due in a timely manner may also be subject to actions under federal debt collection procedures.
( i ) The Board may authorize other organizations to collect assessments on its behalf with the approval of the Department.
[68 FR 58554, Oct. 9, 2003, as amended at 77 FR 21846, Apr. 12, 2012; 84 FR 5345, Feb. 21, 2019; 86 FR 11097, Feb. 24, 2021]
#### AMERICAN STRUCTURAL STEEL CO. v. RUSH.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 14, 1906.)

Damages—Breach of Agreement—Nominal Damages.

One suing for a breach of an agreement entered into on a compromise of a substantial controversy between the parties is, in the absence of evidence of substantial damages, entitled to nominal damages.

[Ed. Note.—Eor eases in point, see vol. 15, Cent. Dig. Damages, § 31.] Dowling, J., dissenting.

Appeal from City Court of New York.

*1020Action by the American Structural Steel Company against Myron C. Rush. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered.

Argued before GIRDERSREEVE, DUGRO, and DOWRING, JJ.

Merrill & Rogers, for appellant.

James W. Ridgway, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

It seems that the contract, upon a breach of which the action is based, was entered into for a sufficient consideration. The defendant agreed, among other things, to retain counsel, and plaintiff agreed to abide by the result of the action in the way in which the contract specifies. The parties had a substantial controversy. It was as to whether the $500 was due. It was compromised by the making of the agreement in question. There may well be a question as to whether there was evidence of substantial damages, but certainly nominal damages were recoverable, and in the interests of justice the judgment will be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Judgment reversed, and. new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

DOWRING, J., dissents.