alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Zumiez Inc., a Washington corporation(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended October 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Richard M. Brooks, Principal Executive Officer of the Company and Trevor S.Lang, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  RICHARD M. BROOKS       |   | /s/  TREVOR S. LANG                        |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
| Richard  M. Brooks           |   | Trevor  S. Lang                            |
|                         |   |                                       |
| Principal  Executive Officer |   | Principal  Financial Officer and Secretary |
| December 7,  2009       |   | (Principal  Accounting Officer)            |
|                         |   | December 7,  2009                     |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zumiez Inc.and will be retained by Zumiez Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilber Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Ricky Ziv, Respondent 

5105 North 401

h Street, Apt. E-407 

Phoenix, AZ 85018 

RECEI\IED 

MAY 1 2 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

May 5, 2014 

Case No. 2014WA910001 

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF APPEARANCE 

COMES NOW, the undersigned, Jay Trumble, Attorney at Law, and submits this Notice of Entry 

of Appearance on behalf of Mr. Ricky Ziv, Respondent, in the matter of the Notice of Proposed 

Civil Penalty issued April18, 2014. 

Please direct all correspondence in this matter to counsel at the Association of Flight AttendantsCWA, 501 Third Street NW, Washington, DC 20001, Attn: John M()rse, Esq. 

Telephooeo 202-344-5<56 F=mrik 888-241-718~ ~ 

Certificate of Service 

By signature below I hereby certify that on May 5, 2014 

a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served upon 

Don Bobertz, Esquire, via U.S. Mail at the Office of the 

Regional Counsel, PO Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

and facsimile transmission at (310) 725-6816. 

ay mble, Attorney at Law
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WA S HINGTO N , D
. C
. 20 4 60

Eric P. Youngdale DuPont Fluoroproducts Ches tnut Run Plaza P.O. Box 2915 974 Centre Road Wilmington, DE 19805 

# APR 1 3 20 1 S O FFI C E O F A IR A N D RA DIATI O N

Re: Complete SNAP Submission for R-513A (O pteon®XPlO) in Refrigeration and Air Co nditi on ing. Dear Mr. Youngdale: T hank you for DuPont's sub mi ss ion to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for R-513A (Opteon® XP 1 0) in refrigeration and air conditioning. The EPA established the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program to implement section 612 ofthe Clean Air Act. Your s ubmi ss io n and the most recent additional information received on December 2, 2014, have been r eviewed fo r completeness. This letter is to inform yo u that we find the information to be complete. More than 90 days h ave elapsed since yo u provided a complete s ubmi ss ion to EPA; therefore , you m ay market R-513A (Opteo n®XP 1 0) for u se in the refrigeration and air conditioning end-uses bel ow at this tim e. Here i s a s ummary of inf ormati on concerning you r submi s sion: Substitute name: R-513A (Opteon ®XPl 0) Sector: Refrigeration and air co nditi on in g End -u ses: • Ce ntrifu gal chillers • Reciprocating , scr ew , and scro ll chillers • Cold sto r age warehouses • Commercial ice machines • Household refrigerators and freezer s • Indu stri a l pro cess refrigeration • Indu strial proce ss air conditioning • Re frige rated tran sp ort • Retail food refri ge ration • Vending mac hin es • Wate r coo lers

lntemet Address ( URL) • http :// www . epa . g ov Recycled/Recyclable • Prin ted wtth Veget ab l e O i l B ased I nks o n R ecy c led Paper (M i n i m um 3 0 % P ostco n sum e r )New or retrofit usage: New and retrofit equipment Date submission received: July 24, 2014 Date most recent information received: December 2, 20 14 Status of submission: Complete If you have any questions about your submission , please contact me at Farguharson.chenise@epa
. gov or by phone at 202-564-7768
. Sincerely ,
Chenise Farquharson ....

# __ Alternatives and Emission s Reduction Branch Strato s pheric Protection Division
Cc: Ms. Mary E. Kohan DuPont Fluoroproducts Chestnut Run Plaza P.O. Box 2915 974 Centre Road Wilmington, DE 19805
§ 1147.109 Supplemental reimbursements. ( a ) The Secretary shall make a supplemental reimbursement to an eligible dairy organization reimbursed under the Milk Donation Reimbursement Program (7 CFR 1146.108) during the period beginning on January 1, 2020, and ending on the date on which funds under § 1147.202 are no longer available.
( b ) A supplemental reimbursement described in paragraph (a) shall be the difference between: ( 1 ) The reimbursement for eligible dairy products calculated under § 1147.108, and
( 2 ) The reimbursement for eligible milk under the Milk Donation Reimbursement Program (7 CFR 1146.108).
##### 



Exhibit 31-8 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, John L. Skolds, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Exelon Generation Company, LLC;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 26, 2005
    /s/ John L. SkoldsPresident(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7182

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

TYRELL DANTE BROWN, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior 

District Judge. (2:00-cr-00094-RGD-2) 

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. 

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Tyrell Dante Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Tyrell Dante Brown appeals from the denial of his 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. On 

appeal, Brown asserts that he is entitled to a reduction under 

Amendment 715 of the Sentencing Guidelines, which was effective 

on May 1, 2008, and may be applied retroactively. See U.S. 

Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(c) (2008). Although the 

district court issued its order prior to the effective date of 

the Amendment, intervening law should, in general, govern cases 

pending on direct review. Litton Sys. v. American Tel. & Tel.

Co., 746 F.2d 168, 173-74 (4th Cir. 1984). Accordingly, we 

vacate the district court’s order and remand for consideration 

of Brown’s motion in light of Amendment 715. We deny Brown’s 

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

VACATED AND REMANDED
#### Ex parte HARDING.

(Supreme Court, *A*pellate Division, Third Department.

March 1 1906.)

In the matter of the application of Fr-Harding for a writ of habeas corpus.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with cosí

PARKER, P. J.,

dissents.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Resource: Why We Launched a Snapchat Account and How We’ll Measure Success

This blog post shares why AIDS.gov created a Snapchat account and illustrates how metrics can be used to track the success of its implementation. 

http://blog.aids.gov/2016/04/why-we-launched-a-snapchat-account-and-how-well-measure-success.html?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 5, 2020

s0602 

# Order

Clerk June 5, 2020

159593

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159593

COA: 340932

Wayne CC: 16

- 009912

- FC

MICHAEL DWAYNE MILLER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 21 , 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

case of People v Davis (Docket No. 160775) is pending on appeal before this Court and

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present a pplication for

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the

decision in that case.
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 12:00 PM

To: 'JR@trumbullunmanned.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Informatio n - Trumbull Unmanned, LLC [FAA-2014-0890]

Dear Petitioner:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2014

‐ 0890). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• Describe the aircraft makes and models for the proposed UAS operation. The descriptions should include the

following: size, maximum weight (including payload), and aircraft type (i.e.

‐ fixed

‐ wing,rotorcraft, lighter

‐ than

‐ air). This

information can be located in the aircraft manuals.

• Identify the type of power source for each proposed aircraft.

• List the maximum aircraft speeds proposed for this operation, please include the airspeed type.

• Provide the maximum operating altitudes, and flight times for the proposed UAS operation.

• Provide information regarding the radio frequency spectrums. This information can be located in the aircraft

manuals.

• Provide information regarding the proposed Loss Link Procedures. Describe any backup safety systems (i.e.

parachute, FTS, geo fencing). This information can be located in the aircraft manuals.

• Your petition references the operating manuals for the aircraft listed below, however the manuals were not

submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced manuals:

• Lockheed Martin Long Endurance SUAS

• Lockheed Martin Indago Quadrotor

• 3D Robotics Fixed Wing

‐ AeroM

• 3D Robotics Multirotor

‐ X8M

• 3D Robotics Quadrotor

‐ Flying Squirrel

• Arcturus T

‐ 20

• Unmanned Flying Rolling Orb "UFRO"

• Sensefly eBee

• SteadiDrone

• DJI S1000

• Skywalker Flying Wing X8

• Oklahoma State University Noctua Fixed Wing Quiet UAV

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 3/5/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.2 Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
#### § 1126.45 Market administrator's reports and announcements concerning classification.

See § 1000.45.
#### § 1001.72 Payments from the producer—settlement fund.

No later than the day after the due date required for payment to the Market Administrator pursuant to § 1001.71 (except as provided in § 1001.90), the Market Administrator shall pay to each handler the amount, if any, by which the amount computed pursuant to § 1001.71(b) exceeds the amount computed pursuant to § 1001.71(a). If, at such time, the balance in the producer-settlement fund is insufficient to make all payments pursuant to this section, the Market Administrator shall reduce uniformly such payments and shall complete the payments as soon as the funds are available.

[70 FR 18963, Apr. 12, 2005]
EXHIBIT 12

                  THE CIT GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (Dollar Amounts In Millions)

                                                              Three Months Ended
                                                                    March 31,
                                                               ----------------
                                                                1997      1996
                                                               ------    ------
Net income                                                     $ 70.1    $ 59.8

Provision for income taxes                                       40.7      37.1
                                                               ------    ------
Earnings before provision for income taxes                      110.8      96.9
                                                               ------    ------
Fixed charges:
  Interest and debt expense on indebtedness                     223.1     207.2
  Interest factor - one third of rentals on
   real and personal properties                                   2.1       1.9
  Minority interest in subsidiary trust holding solely
   debentures of the company                                      1.9      --
                                                               ------    ------
Total fixed charges                                             227.1     209.1
                                                               ------    ------
     Total earnings before provision for income
     taxes and fixed charges                                   $337.9    $306.0
                                                               ======    ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                              1.49x     1.46x
                                                               ======    ======
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110607.eng.txt[8/1/2012 2:35:38 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0607 Focus Ready Draft 9/15/2011 ENGINEER: Arnold \ JD PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110607.eng.txt[8/1/2012 2:35:38 PM] SAT (concerns) (09/07/2011): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Migration to groundwater: Slow to moderate PBT rating: P1B1T1 . Health: 1 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, Consumer, XB Testing (Testing desired) Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 6 ppb)
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B
NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

:file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110607.eng.txt[8/1/2012 2:35:38 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0607

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110607.eng.txt[8/1/2012 2:35:38 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0607file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110607.eng.txt[8/1/2012 2:35:38 PM] ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium.file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110607.eng.txt[8/1/2012 2:35:38 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0607file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110607.eng.txt[8/1/2012 2:35:38 PM]file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110607.eng.txt[8/1/2012 2:35:38 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 11-0607file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110607.eng.txt[8/1/2012 2:35:38 PM]
970.0404-3 Responsibilities of contracting officers. ( a ) Management and operating contracts which may require the processing or storage of Restricted Data or Special Nuclear Material require application of the applicable DOE Directives in the safeguards and security series.
( b ) The contracting officer shall refer to subpart 904.71 for guidance concerning the prohibition on award of a DOE contract under a national security program to a company owned by an entity controlled by a foreign government when access to proscribed information is required to perform the contract.
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 14878, Mar. 28, 2002; 74 FR 36371, July 22, 2009]
#### § 1210.605 Ballots.

The referendum agent and subagents shall accept all ballots cast. However, if an agent or subagent deems that a ballot should be questioned for any reason, the agent or subagent shall endorse above their signature, on the ballot, a statement to the effect that such ballot was questioned, by whom questioned, why the ballot was questioned, the results of any investigation made with respect to the questionable ballot, and the disposition of the questionable ballot. Ballots invalid under this subpart shall not be counted.
#### § 1210.303 Plan.

*Plan* means this watermelon research and promotion Plan issued by the Secretary pursuant to the Act.