Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 41 / Thursday, March 4, 2021 / Notices 12713 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 5170 

(March 2021), entitled 

Pentafluoroethane (R–125) from China: 

Investigation Nos. 701–TA–662 and 

731–TA–1554 (Preliminary). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 26, 2021. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04432 Filed 3–3–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1125–0003] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed Collection 

Comments Requested; Fee Waiver 

Request 

AGENCY: Executive Office for 

Immigration Review, Department of 

Justice. 

ACTION: 60-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Executive Office for Immigration 

Review (EOIR), will be submitting the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until May 

3, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Lauren Alder Reid, Assistant Director, 

Office of Policy, Executive Office for 

Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg 

Pike, Suite 2500, Falls Church, VA 

22041, telephone: (703) 305–0289. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Executive Office for 

Immigration Review, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Revision and extension of a currently 

approved collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Fee Waiver Request. 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

The form number is EOIR–26A, 

Executive Office for Immigration 

Review, United States Department of 

Justice. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: An individual 

submitting an appeal or motion to the 

Board of Immigration Appeals. An 

individual submitting an application or 

motion to the Office of the Chief 

Immigration Judge. Other: Attorneys 

and qualified representatives 

representing an alien in immigration 

proceedings before EOIR. Abstract: The 

information on the fee waiver request 

form is used by the Board of 

Immigration Appeals and the Office of 

the Chief Immigration Judge to 

determine whether the requisite fee for 

an application, motion or appeal will be 

waived due to an individual’s financial 

situation. 

5. An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: It is estimated that 5,499 

respondents will complete the form 

annually with an average of 1 hour per 

response. 

6. An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The estimated public burden 

associated with this collection is 5,499 

hours. It is estimated that respondents 

will take 1 hour to complete the form. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Melody Braswell, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405B, 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: February 26, 2021. 

Melody D. Braswell, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04418 Filed 3–3–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–30–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act 

On January 20, 2021, the Department 

of Justice lodged a proposed consent 

decree with the United States District 

Court for the District of Utah in the 

lawsuit entitled United States of 

America v. Magnesium Corporation of 

America, et al., Civil Action No. 

2:01CV0040–DBB. 

If approved by the court, the consent 

decree would resolve the claims of the 

United States against US Magnesium 

LLC (‘‘USM’’), the Renco Group, Inc. 

(‘‘Group’’), the Ira Leon Rennert 

Revocable Trusts (‘‘Trusts’’), and Mr. Ira 

Leon Rennert (‘‘Rennert’’), collectively 

‘‘Defendants,’’ for injunctive relief and 

civil penalties for alleged violations of 

the Resource Conservation and 

Recovery Act (‘‘RCRA’’) at USM’s 

magnesium production facility in 

Rowley, Utah. The consent decree 

would require USM to: (1) Make 

extensive process modifications at the 

facility, including construction of a 

filtration plant to treat all wastewaters, 

that will reduce the environmental 

impacts from its production operations 

and ensure greater protection for its 

workers; (2) establish appropriate 

financial assurance for closure or 

corrective action of certain waste 

management areas in the operating areas 

of the facility; (3) pay a civil penalty of 

$250,000; and (4) perform the CERCLA 

Response Action, which includes 

construction of a barrier wall around 

1,700 acres of the operating portions of 

the facility to prevent leaks or breaches 

of hazardous materials to the Great Salt 

Lake, and the payment of EPA costs 

incurred in connection with the 

CERCLA Response Action. 

In return for the Settling Defendants’ 

compliance with these requirements, 

the consent decree would resolve past 

RCRA violations at the Rowley facility 

that the United States’ complaint 

alleges. Provided that the Settling 

Defendants remain in compliance with 

the consent decree’s requirements, 

including payment of EPA CERCLA 

Response Action costs, the United 

States would covenant not to sue the 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES