alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAYMOND EDWARD GILL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cr-00577-RDB-1; 1:18-cv-01303-RDB)

Submitted: November 23, 2021 Decided: November 30, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Edward Gill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Edward Gill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 60 motion for relief from the court’s prior order denying relief on Gill’s 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 motion. In his Rule 60 motion, Gill asserted that the probation officer unlawfully 

relied on Gill’s prior convictions to designate him a career offender. Because this motion 

sought to add a new ground for relief in his § 2255 proceeding that challenged Gill’s 

sentence, the district court’s order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A); see also Gonzalez v. Crosby, 

545 U.S. 524, 531-32 (2005); United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 397-99 (4th Cir. 

2015). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the 

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or 

wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies 

relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of 

a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

Absent prefiling authorization from this court, the district court lacked jurisdiction 

to entertain the reconsideration motion, which was, in actuality, a successive § 2255 

motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability 
3

and dismiss Gill’s appeal. To the extent Gill is seeking authorization to file a successive 

§ 2255 motion, we deny such authorization. See United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 

208 (4th Cir. 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
§ 1205.24 General. A sign-up period will be conducted to determine whether eligible producers and importers favor the conduct of a referendum on the continuance of the 1991 amendments to the Order. ( a ) If the Secretary determines, based on the results of the sign-up period, that at least 10 percent (4,622) or more of the number of cotton producers and importers who voted in the 1991 referendum request the conduct of a continuance referendum on the 1991 Order amendments, a referendum will be held within 12 months after the end of the sign-up period. Not more than 20 percent of the total requests counted toward the 10 percent figure may be from producers from any one state or from importers of cotton.
( b ) If the Secretary determines that fewer than 10 percent (4,622) of the number of producers and importers who voted in the 1991 referendum do not favor a continuance referendum, no referendum will be held.
#### § 1212.21 Qualified national organization representing first handler interests.

“Qualified national organization representing first handler interests” means an organization that the Secretary certifies as being eligible to nominate first handler and alternate first handler members of the Board under § 1212.42.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Zumiez Inc., a Washington corporation(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended August 1,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Richard M. Brooks, Principal Executive Officer of the Company and Trevor S.Lang, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that:

 

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  RICHARD M. BROOKS       |   | /s/  TREVOR S. LANG                                    |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Richard  M. Brooks           |   | Trevor  S. Lang                                        |
|                         |   |                                                   |
| Principal  Executive Officer |   | Principal  Financial Officer and Secretary             |
| August 28,  2009        |   | (Principal  Accounting Officer)   August 28, 2009 |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zumiez Inc.and will be retained by Zumiez Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Roberto Rengifo, Respondent, v City of New York, Defendant, and Shareen Realty Corp., Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 865]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Shareen Realty Corp. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated March 11, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the contentions of the defendant Shareen Realty Corp. (hereinafter Shareen), it did not establish a prima facie case for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Shareen failed to submit sufficient evidence in admissible form demonstrating the absence of any triable issues of fact concerning the nature and location of the alleged sidewalk defect *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]; *Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Moreover, to meet its prima facie burden, Shareen could not rely on the evidence submitted for the first time in its reply papers *(see Adler v Suffolk County Water Auth.,*306 AD2d 229 [2003]; *Constantine v Premier Cab Corp.,*295 AD2d 303 [2002]; *Feratovic v Lun Wah, Inc.,*284 AD2d 368 [2001]; *Voytek Tech. v Rapid Access Consulting,*279 AD2d 470 [2001]). In any event, granting Shareen’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint would have been premature since discovery was outstanding at the time the motion was made *(see*CPLR 3212 [f]; *Lantigua v Mallick,*263 AD2d 467 [1999]; *Brown v County of Nassau,*226 AD2d 492 [1996]; *Yu v Forero,*184 AD2d 506 [1992]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  FloridaFirst  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Gregory  C.  Wilkes,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Kerry P.  Charlet,  Chief
Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Gregory C. Wilkes                   /s/ Kerry P. Charlet
-------------------------------         ----------------------------------------
Gregory C. Wilkes                       Kerry P. Charlet
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer




December 19, 2003
Nicor Inc.
                                         Birdsall, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan
                                         Form 11-K
                                         Exhibit 23.01




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement No.
333-107375 on Form S-8 of our report dated June 8, 2005, relating to the
financial statements of Nicor Inc. appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K
of Birdsall, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan for the year ended December 31, 2004.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
June 8, 2005
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 75 to Registration Statement No. 002-30447 on Form N-1A of our report dated May 29, 2018, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of Nicholas Fund, Inc.(the Fund), appearing in theAnnual Report on Form N-CSR of the Fund for the year ended March 31, 2018, and to the references to us under theheadings Financial Highlights and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firmin the Prospectus andDisclosure of Portfolio Holdings,Shareholder Reports and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Legal Counselin the Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement.   Milwaukee, WisconsinJuly 27, 2018
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Share With Youth: Run, Swim, and Have Fun Outside      

# Share With Youth: Run, Swim, and Have Fun Outside

Summer is a time for having fun outdoors, but teens must be aware of sun safety and air quality in order to avoid injury and aggravating chronic conditions. These federal resources can help young people — and the adults who work with them — stay safe while enjoying the summer months:
                  - The Environmental Protection Agency’s  ultraviolet (UV) index forecasts  can help users prepare for, and avoid excess, UV exposure.
                  - The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s  Sun Safety for America’s Youth Toolkit  has sun-safe policies for community programs.
                  - Use  Airnow.gov  to track local air quality and prepare accordingly for outdoor activities for youth with asthma.

http://www2.epa.gov/sunwise/uv-index?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=share-with-youth
,

Mr. Dennis M. McLenan, Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue 

Seattle, W A 9810 l 

RE: SIP Revision- Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Limited Maintenance Plan for PM10 

Dear Mr. McLerran: 

As the Governor's designee for the State Implementation Plan (SIP), I submit the Spokane County, 

Washington, Second 10-Year Limited Maintenance Plan for Pa1ticulate Matter (PM 10) for your 

review and approval and to update the Washington SIP. The Washington State Department of 

Ecology (Ecology) adopted this SIP Revision effective November 24, 2015. 

Tllis SIP revision, prepared by the Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency, details Washington's plan 

to continue to maintain air quality (i.e., maintenance plan) in the Spokane County Maintenance 

Area (SCMA) for the period of2015 through 2025. The SCMA includes Spokane, Spokane Valley, 

Millwood and the unincorporated areas in between these cities. This plan maintains the same 

control strategies that brought the area back into compliance with the PM10 NAAQS. 

The Clean Air Act requires that former nonattainment areas have maintenance plans that ensure 

they will continue to meet the standard. In 2005, EPA designated the SCMA to attainment and 

approved the first maintenance plan. Tllis SIP revision is the final maintenance plan for tills area 

required by the Clean Air Act. 

On October 2, 2015, a legal notice announcing opp01turuty to comment and request a hearing was 

published in The Spokesman Review. This announcement provided at least 30 days advance notice 

of the hearing. The public comment peliod was open from October 1 to November 9, 2015. No 

hearing was requested, so no hearing was held. Ecology received one comment on the proposal. 

Ecology's response to the comment, SIP Adoption Order, and documentation demonstrating how 

Ecology met public notice requirements of 40 CFR §51.1 02 are included in the SIP submittal 

package. 
Maia D. Bellon 

Director 

cc: Jeff Hunt, Environmental Protection Agency 

Stu Clark, Ecology Air Program Manager 

Julie Oliver, Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency Executive Director 

Records file
OMB Control Number 2070-0060; EPA ICR Number 0277.15

ICR ATTACHMENT B

Forms for Pesticide Registration

EPA Form 8570-1, Application for Pesticide, Registration, Amendment, Other EPA Form 8570-4, Confidential Statement of Formula (CSF) EPA Form 8570-27, Formulator’s Exemption Statement EPA Form 8570-34, Certification With Respec t to Citation of Data EPA Form 8570-35, Data Matrix

EPA Form 8570-36, Summary of the Physical/chemical Properties EPA Form 8570-37, Self- certification Statement for the Ph ysical/Chemical Properties
Exhibit 99(a)

Household Finance Corporation
Household Automotive Trust VI    (2000-3)
-----------------------------------------


Original Principal Class A
   Class A-1                               136,000,000
   Class A-2                               158,000,000
   Class A-3                               175,000,000
   Class A-4                               193,000,000
Number of Class A Bonds (000's)
   Class A-1                                   136,000
   Class A-2                                   158,000
   Class A-3                                   175,000
   Class A-4                                   193,000


Distribution Date                                                  2002 Totals
Days

CLASS A
Class A-1 Principal Distribution                                            0.00
Class A-1 Interest Distribution                                             0.00

Class A-2 Principal Distribution                                   55,317,213.74
Class A-2 Interest Distribution                                       746,003.77

Class A-3 Principal Distribution                                  100,337,634.16
Class A-3 Interest Distribution                                    10,001,187.23

Class A-4 Principal Distribution                                            0.00
Class A-4 Interest Distribution                                    13,818,800.04
#### § 1126.43 General classification rules.

See § 1000.43.
#### In the Matter of State Farm Insurance Company, Appellant, v Anton Karvalis et al., Respondents.

[775 NYS2d 571]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (McGuirk, J.), dated May 12, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the contention of State Farm Insurance Company, its petition for a stay of arbitration was properly denied as untimely *(see*CPLR 7503 [c]; *Matter of Steck [State Farm Ins. Co.],*89 NY2d 1082 [1996]; *Matter of Hartford Ins. Co. v Buonocore,*252 AD2d 500 [1998]; *Matter of Travelers Prop. Cas. Corp. v Klepper,*275 AD2d 234 [2000]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.
----

|   | (1) | Such      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15 (d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of  Tri-ValleyCorporation. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November      10, 2008                                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                     |
| By:    | /s/Arthur M. Evans                                                       |
|   | Arthur      M. Evans, Chief Financial OfficerTri-Valley      Corporation |

----
# Patent

## Title
Bio-thermo tip sensor

## Abstract

After transformation of the plasmids into E. coli MC1061, the clones were cultivated and lysed as described in example 2, and the hGh production was measured by ELlSA. The found yields are stated in table III. ______________________________________ Clone          mg hGH/1 OD1 ______________________________________ MAE-hGH        10 MAEAE-hGH      8 MAEE-hGH       8.5 ______________________________________

## Background
## Claims

1. A recombinant sequence containing a ribosome binding site with the SD sequence AGGA and the start codon ATG, comprising a nucleotide sequence whose +strand has the formula: wherein X is A, C or T, n is 5-8.

2. A DNA sequence according to claim 1, containing the sequence AGCTTAAGGAGGTTATAAATTCGATG.

3. A DNA sequence according to claim 1, containing the sequence AGCTTAAGGAGGTTCCTTACGATG.

4. A DNA sequence according to claim 1, containing the sequence AGCTTAAGGAGGTTAAAATCGATG.

5. A DNA sequence according to claim 1, containing the sequence AGCTTAAGGAGGTTATAACGATG.

6. A replicable cloning vector, containing the DNA sequence stated in claim 1 and a gene coding for a desired protein, optionally followed by a transcription stop signal.

7. A bacterium containing the replicable cloning vector stated in claim 1.
## APPENDIX K. Summary of National and International PBT Criteria

PROPERTY ORGANIZATION and POLICY 1 Persistence Bioaccumulation Toxicity

U.S. EPA, Office of Environmental Information 2 Half-life ≥ 2 months in soil, sediment or water OR Half-life ≥ 2 days in air BAF/BCF ≥ 1,000 Professional judgment based on level of risk

UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) 3 Half-life > 2 months in water; > 6 months in soil or sediment; or otherwise sufficiently persistent to be of concern BAF/BCF > 5000 or Log Kow > 5 Potential to affect human health and/or the environment adversely

UNEP POPs/CEG Framework (Stockholm Convention) 4 Half-life > 2 months in water; >2 or 6 months in soil or sediment; or other evidence that substance is sufficiently persistent to be of concern BCF/BAF > 5000 or Log Kow > 5; or evidence that substance with significantly lower BCF/BAF is of concern, e.g.,due to high toxicity/ecotoxicity; or monitoring data in biota indicating sufficient bioaccumulation to be of

concern Toxicity characteristics indicating potential damage to human health or the environment.

Environment Canada Toxic Substances Management Policy (June 1995) 5 Half-life ≥ 2 days air; ≥ 6 months water/soil; ≥ 1 year in sediment BAF or BCF >5000 or Log Kow >5 CEPA toxic (Defined at the following URL: http://www.ec.gc.ca/CEPAR egistry/gene_info/CEPA_TO XIC.pdf)

ICCA 6 Half-life ≥ 6 months in

water, ≥ 1 yr in soil/sediment, or ≥ 5 days air BCF ≥ 5,000 or Log Kow between 5 and 7.5, MW<700 and substance is not metabolized Expert judgment that effects 7 are expected to occur at the concentrations observed in the environment

1. Other U.S. and International criteria are consistent with criteria presented in this table 2. Office of Environmental Information. Federal Register: October 29, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 209). Rules and Regulations. Page 58665-58753. On-line at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-WAS TE/1999/October/Day-29/f28169.htm 3. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) (Ref. 54); PTBs (February 1996)) http://www.unece. org/env/lrtap/ 4. United Nations Environmental Programme http://www.chem.unep.ch/pops/default.html 5. Environment Canada Toxic Substances Management Policy (June 1995) 6. International Council of Chemical Associations http://www.icca-chem.org/ 7. Effects include acute aquatic lethality, subchronic an d chronic aquatic toxicity, acute wildlife toxicity, oral/dermal/inhalation toxicity in mammals in birds, ca rcinogenicity, mutagenicity, teratogenicity, reproductive toxicity, neurological toxicity, and immune system effects



### K-1