alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p. 1 

# oPVr2co9-o53/ ACETO 

# ~ REC'D MAR 11 2011 A Aceto Corporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 Tel : (516) 627 6000 Fax: (516) 627 6093 www .aceto .com February 16, 2011 Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460-0001 

# IIII4IIIIIIINIII,IIIIINIYIIIIII'IhIIIIIIII~JIYI

ATTN : TSCA Section 4 - Docket Identification Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 Re: Application for Exemption, Section 4 Test Rule, 1H,3H-Benzol[1,2-c :4,5-c']difuran-1,3,5,7- tetrone, CASH 89-32-7, Testing of certain high production volume chemicals; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol . 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087 Dear Sir or Madam

: Aceto Corporation submits this application for exemption fromthe requirements for testing 1H,3HBenzol[1,2-c :4,5-c']difuran-1,3,5,7-tetrone, CASH 89-32-7 under TSCA Section 4 Test Rule as noted above. As part of our exemption application we are providing the following information: (a) The identity of the test rule, the chemical identity, and the CAS No. of the test substance on which the application is based. Testing of certain high production volume chemicals ; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol . 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087, 1H,3H-Benzol[1,2-c :4,5- c']difuran-1,3,5,7-tetrone, CASH 89-32-7. (b) We are requesting an exemption fromall testing requirements for 1H,3H-Benzo1[1,2-c" 4,5- c']difuran-1,3,5,7-tetrone, CASH 89-32-7 under 40 CFR 799.5087 because we believe that this material is already being sponsored for testing (per above) by another party. (c) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant . ACETOCorporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 516-627-6000 (d) Name, address, and telephone number of appropriate individual to contact for further information. Suhey Francisco. Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs ACETOCorporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 

## 33336 9- REC' EsiVc 7D 

## I I FE6 23 kM b: 

# a/

CONTAINS NOCB1

### 516-627-6000

As per 40 CFR 790.99, ACETOCorporation provides our Statement of financial responsibility per our application for exemption: I (ACETOCorporation) understand that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, ACETOCorporation must pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of my application was based. If you have any further questions please contact me. Sincerely, Suhey Francisco. Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs ACETO Corporation
#### § 1212.1 Act.

“Act” means the Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996, (7 U.S.C. 7411-7425), and any amendments to that Act.
#### In the Matter of Michael A. Lucian, Petitioner, v H. Carl McCall, as State Comptroller, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 637]

*906Mugglin, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a police officer for the Village of Port Chester, Westchester County, was dispatched to assist an elderly man who had fallen out of bed. As petitioner attempted to lift the man into bed, a throw rug on the floor slipped, causing petitioner to fall and be injured. The Hearing Officer denied his application for accidental disability retirement benefits on the basis that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 363. Respondent upheld the denial and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

In order for an injury to be considered accidental under the Retirement and Social Security Law, it must have resulted from “a ‘sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact’ ” *(Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. II,*57 NY2d 1010, 1012 [1982], quoting *Johnson Corp. v Indemnity Ins. Co. of N. Am.,*6 AD2d 97, 100 [1958], *affd*7 NY2d 222 [1959]; *see Matter of Amadio v McCall,*2 AD3d 1131, 1131 [2003]). Crucial to such a finding is that the event precipitating the injury was not a risk of the work performed *(see Matter of Amadio v McCall, supra*at 1132; *Matter of Nedwick v McCall,*308 AD2d 653, 653 [2003]; *Matter of Jonigan v McCall,*291 AD2d 766, 766 [2002]).

At the time of his injury, petitioner was performing routine duties as a police officer in going to the aid of a distressed citizen. That a throw rug might slip under petitioner’s feet while he was performing these duties is both a risk inherent in the performance of his routine duties and not an unexpected event. Thus, substantial evidence supports respondent’s determination that this incident was not an accident within the meaning of the statute *(see Matter of Stevens v New York State Comptroller,*299 AD2d 644 [2002]).

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
[491O-13-P) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14eFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2009-1166; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-I07-AD; Amendme 

# \0165 Dl-/0 39-*****; AD 2010-**-**} RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4~2C, B4-103, and B4-203 Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products lis above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority ofanother country toidentify and correct an unsafe ATE condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: OWING SYMOOl



## '"
wnoc;; !MdlIQl

n 

# -,

n LN'T'/Il..SIS1G

This condition, ifnot detected and corrected, could lead to further cases of mal-phasing oftbe hydraulic motors ofthe THSA..-causing degradation of the power gears and potentially resulting inreduced control ofthe aeroplane. One operator reported loss ofboth pitch trims following autopilot disengagement after take off. Subsequent shop findings revealed severe damage tothe power gears. Mal-phasing between the hydraulic motors was suspected tohave induced excessive loads into the gear train, leading to collapse ofone bearing on ashaft ofthe main gear, causing severe tooth damage. The combination oftooth damage and gear tilting caused the disconnection oftwo ofthe three hydraulic motors, resulting injamming ofthe THSA [trimmable horizontal stabilizer actuator] gearbox and consequent loss ofTRSA control.
#### In the Matter of Stanley Nelson et al., Respondents, v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellant.

—■ In a proceeding under CPLR article 78, the Board of Examiners of the Board of Education of the City of New York appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 26, 1965, which adjudged that failure ratings given petitioners in an examination for license as principal of an elementary school be cancelled and that each petitioner be afforded a new interview test. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. We are of the opinion that the 21 items delineating the four major categories of the test were sufficient objective ratings. Accordingly, in that respect, we disagree with the conclusions of the learned Trial Justice. We do agree, however, that an adequate record should have been made in order to determine whether the ratings were capricious. The so-called running notes made by the panel, at a time when each member was also engaged in questioning on the above-mentioned 21 items, are completely inadequate. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32-6

              Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18 United States Code

         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
     Form 10-Q of PECO Energy Company for the quarterly period ended September
     30, 2003, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of
     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the
     information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PECO Energy
     Company.


     Date:  October 29, 2003                  /s/ Robert S. Shapard
                                              ---------------------
                                              Robert S. Shapard
                                              Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              Exelon Corporation
#### LAVANDOWSKI, Respondent, v. DYMOWSKI, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 2, 1906.)

Action by Frank Lavandowski against Michael Dymowski.

No opinion. Order of the County Court of Kings county affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Train Juvenile Justice Staff to Educate Youth on Sexual Health      

# Train Juvenile Justice Staff to Educate Youth on Sexual Health

Without other trusted adults to guide them, young men in juvenile justice facilities may turn to employees for information about sexual health, a role that these individuals may not be trained to fulfill. To answer this need,  the Washington State Department of Health, through the State Personal Responsibility Education Program, provided training to juvenile justice staff to deliver evidence-based sexual health curricula to youth.

http://ncfy.acf.hhs.gov/news/2015/03/train-juvenile-justice-staff-educate-youth-sexual-health?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: SITE ASSESS: A Mobile Application for K-12 Schools and School Districts      

# Resource: SITE ASSESS: A Mobile Application for K-12 Schools and School Districts

This free mobile application, developed by the Readiness and Emergency Management for Schools Technical Assistance Center, allows school and school district personnel to walk around school grounds and examine their safety, security, accessibility, and emergency preparedness.

http://rems.ed.gov/SITEASSESS.aspx?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resources
§ 11.32 Initial requests for records. ( a ) Requests for NAD records should be in writing and addressed to the NAD official having custody of the records desired as indicated in § 11.22(d). Addresses are found in Appendix A of this subpart. In his or her petition, the requester may ask for a fee waiver if there is likely to be a charge for the requested information. The criteria for waiver of fees are found in section 6 of appendix A, subpart A of part 1 of this title. All requests for records shall be deemed to have been made pursuant to FOIA, regardless of whether FOIA is specifically mentioned. To facilitate processing of a request, the phrase “FOIA REQUEST” should be placed in capital letters on the front of the envelope.
( b ) A request must reasonably describe records to enable NAD personnel to locate them with reasonable effort. Where possible, a requester should supply specific information, such as dates, titles, appellant name or appeal number, that may help identify the records. If the request relates to a matter in pending litigation, the court and its location should be identified.
( c ) If NAD determines that a request does not reasonably describe the records, it shall inform the requester of this fact and extend the requester an opportunity to clarify the request or to confer promptly with knowledgeable NAD personnel to attempt to identify the records he or she is seeking. The “date of receipt” in such instances, for purposes of § 1.12(a) of this title, shall be the date of receipt of the amended or clarified request.
( d ) Nothing in this subpart shall be interpreted to preclude NAD from honoring an oral request for information, but if the requester is dissatisfied with the response, the NAD official involved shall advise the requester to submit a written request in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section. The “date of receipt” of such a request for purposes of § 1.12(a) of this title shall be the date of receipt of the written request. For recordkeeping purposes, the NAD official responding to an oral request for information may ask the requester to also submit his or her request in writing.
( e ) If a request for records or a fee waiver under this subpart is denied, the person making the request shall have the right to appeal the denial. Requesters also may appeal NAD decisions regarding a requester's status for purposes of fee levels under section 5 of Appendix A, subpart A of part 1 of this title. All appeals must be in writing and addressed to the official designated in § 11.33. To facilitate processing of an appeal, the phrase “FOIA APPEAL” should be placed in capital letters on the front of the envelope.
( f ) NAD shall develop and maintain a record of all written and oral FOIA requests and FOIA appeals received by NAD, which shall include, in addition to any other information, the name of the requester, brief summary of the information requested, an indication of whether the request or appeal was denied or partially denied, the FOIA exemption(s) cited as the basis for any denials, and the amount of fees associated with the request or appeal.
#### In the Matter of Toniqua A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 853]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeals are from (1) an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Klein, J.), dated May 20, 2002, which granted an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal of the underlying juvenile delinquency proceeding, and (2) an order of fact-finding and disposition of the same court dated February 6, 2003, which, upon restoring the matter to the calendar, and after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that the appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, adjudged her to be a juvenile delinquent, and placed her on probation for a period of one year.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated May 20, 2002, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the order is not *793appealable as of right *(see*Family Ct Act § 365.1 [1]; *Matter of Edwin L.,*88 NY2d 593, 600-601 [1996]; *Matter of Jeffrey M.,*62 AD2d 858, 860 [1978]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see Matter of David H.,*69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the Family Court’s finding that the appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree *(cf. People v Cintron,*95 NY2d 329, 332 [2000]; *People v Zorcik,*67 NY2d 670, 671 [1986]).

The appellant’s contention that the Family Court should have drawn an adverse inference with respect to certain witnesses who did not testify at the fact-finding hearing is unpreserved for appellate review *(cf.*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Russell,*209 AD2d 650, 651 [1994]), and in any event, is without merit *(cf. People v Gonzalez,*68 NY2d 424, 427 [1986]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions either are waived *(see*Family Ct Act § 330.2 [7]; *Matter of Leslie S.,*172 AD2d 754 [1991]), or without merit. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Crane, JJ, concur.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

HBIO Securities Corp. (United States) 

Harvard Apparatus FSC, Inc. (U.S. Virgin Islands) 

Warner Instruments LLC (United States) 

Union Biometrica, Inc. (United States) 

Harvard Apparatus, Ltd. (United Kingdom)

Harvard Apparatus, SARL (France) 

Biochrom Ltd. (United Kingdom) 

Scie-Plas Ltd. (United Kingdom) 

Asys Hitech GmbH (Austria) 

Hugo Sachs Elektronik Harvard Apparatus GmbH (Germany) 

Union Biometrica GmbH (Germany) 

Ealing Scientific Ltd. Canada (doing business as Harvard Apparatus, Canada) (Canada) 

Genomic Solutions, Inc. (United States) 

Cartesian Technology, Inc. (United States) 

Genomic Solutions, Ltd. (United Kingdom) 

Genomic Solutions Acquisitions, Ltd. (United Kingdom) 

Genomic Solutions Canada Inc.(United States) 

Genomic Solutions (CDN), Inc. (Canada) 

Hoefer, Inc. (United States) 

KDS, Inc. (United States) 

Panlab s.l. (Spain)
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           50 Years of Medicaid: Women, AI/AN, and Immigrants      

# 50 Years of Medicaid: Women, AI/AN, and Immigrants

In commemoration of the 50th anniversary of Medicaid, CMCS created a compilation of Medicaid’s progress over the years in serving women, American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) individuals, and immigrants. 

http://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid-50th-anniversary/50th-anniversary.html?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
909.400 Scope of subpart. This subpart— ( a ) Prescribes policies and procedures governing the debarment and suspension of organizations and individuals from participating in Department of Energy (DOE) and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) contracts, procurement sales contracts, and real property purchase agreements, and from participating in DOE and, NNSA approved subcontracts and subagreements;
( b ) Sets forth the causes, procedures, and requirements for determining the scope, duration, and effect of DOE and NNSA debarment and suspension actions; and
( c ) Implements and supplements 48 CFR subpart 9.4 with respect to the exclusion of organizations and individuals from procurement contracting and Government approved subcontracting.
[61 FR 39857, July 31, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 36362, July 22, 2009; 76 FR 7691, 7692, Feb. 11, 2011]