Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 41 / Thursday, March 4, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 12543 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated 

implementing instructions, and 

Environmental Planning COMDTINST 

5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves a 

temporary safety zone on the LMR at 

MM 368 through 370 in the vicinity of 

Natchez, MS, that will prohibit entry 

into this zone. The safety zone will only 

be enforced while operations preclude 

the safe navigation of the established 

channel. It is categorically excluded 

from further review under paragraph 

L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS 

Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, 

Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental 

Consideration supporting this 

determination is available in the docket. 

For instructions on locating the docket, 

see the ADDRESSES section of this 

preamble. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 

1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0071 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T08–0071 Safety Zone; Lower 

Mississippi River, Mile Marker 368 through 

370, Natchez, MS. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

safety zone: All navigable waters of the 

Lower Mississippi River at Mile Marker 

(MM) 368 through 370 in the vicinity of 

Natchez, MS. 

(b) Regulations. (1) Under the general 

safety zone regulations in subpart C of 

this part, you may not enter the safety 

zone described in paragraph (a) of this 

section unless authorized by the Captain 

of the Port Sector Lower Mississippi 

River (COTP) or the COTP’s designated 

representative. A designated 

representative is a commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. 

Coast Guard assigned to units under the 

operational control of USCG Sector 

Lower Mississippi River. 

(2) To seek permission to enter, 

contact the COTP or the COTP’s 

representative via VHF–FM channel 16 

or by telephone at 901–521–4822. Those 

in the safety zone must comply with all 

lawful orders or directions given to 

them by the COTP or the COTP’s 

designated representative. 

(c) Effective period. This section is 

effective from March 1, 2021, until 

March 15, 2021. 

(d) Information broadcasts. The COTP 

or a designated representative will 

inform the public of the enforcement 

times and date for this safety zone 

through Broadcast Notices to Mariners, 

Local Notices to Mariners, and/or Safety 

Marine Information Broadcasts, as 

appropriate. 

Dated: February 26, 2021. 

R.S. Rhodes, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Sector Lower Mississippi River. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04451 Filed 3–3–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2021–0125] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Red River, Mile Marker 59, 

Moncla, LA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of 

Homeland Security (DHS). 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a temporary safety zone for 

all navigable waters of the Red River 

(RR), Mile Marker 58 through 60. The 

safety zone is needed to protect persons, 

property, and the marine environment 

from the potential safety hazards 

associated with line pulling operations 

in the vicinity of Moncla, LA. Entry of 

persons or vessels into this zone is 

prohibited unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port Sector Lower 

Mississippi River or a designated 

representative. 

DATES: This rule is effective without 

actual notice from March 4, 2021 until 

March 10, 2021. For the purposes of 

enforcement, actual notice will be used 

from March 3, 2021 until March 4, 2021. 

ADDRESSES: To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to https://

www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021– 

0125 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rule. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email MSTC Lindsey Swindle, U.S. 

Coast Guard; telephone 901–521–4813, 

email Lindsey.M.Swindle@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

COTP Captain of the Port Sector Lower 

Mississippi River 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
12544 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 41 / Thursday, March 4, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 

II. Background Information and 

Regulatory History 

The Coast Guard is issuing this 

temporary rule without prior notice and 

opportunity to comment pursuant to 

authority under section 4(a) of the 

Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 

U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision 

authorizes an agency to issue a rule 

without prior notice and opportunity to 

comment when the agency for good 

cause finds that those procedures are 

‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that 

good cause exists for not publishing a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

with respect to this rule because it is 

impracticable. Immediate action is 

needed to protect persons and property 

from the potential safety hazards 

associated with line pulling operations. 

The NPRM process would delay the 

establishment of the safety zone until 

after the date of the event and 

compromise public safety. We must 

establish this temporary safety zone 

immediately and lack sufficient time to 

provide a reasonable comment period 

and then consider those comments 

before issuing the rule. 

Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 

Guard finds that good cause exists for 

making this rule effective less than 30 

days after publication in the Federal 

Register. Delaying the effective date of 

this rule would be contrary to the public 

interest because immediate action is 

needed to respond to the potential 

safety hazards associated with the line 

pulling operations in the vicinity of 

Moncla, LA. 

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule 

The Coast Guard is issuing this rule 

under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 

(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The 

Captain of the Port Sector Lower 

Mississippi River (COTP) has 

determined that potential hazards 

associated with the line pulling 

operations, would be a safety concern 

for all persons and vessels on the Red 

River between MM 58 and MM 60 in the 

vicinity of Moncla, LA. This rule is 

needed to protect persons, property, 

infrastructure, and the marine 

environment in all waters of the RR 

within the safety zone while line 

pulling operations are being conducted. 

IV. Discussion of the Rule 

This rule establishes a temporary 

safety zone from March 3, 2021 through 

March 10, 2021. The safety zone will 

cover all navigable waters of the RR 

from MM 58 through MM 60 in the 

vicinity of Moncla, LA. The duration of 

this safety zone is intended to ensure 

the safety of waterway users on these 

navigable waters during line pulling 

operations. 

Entry of persons or vessels into this 

safety zone is prohibited unless 

authorized by the COTP or a designated 

representative. A designated 

representative is a commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. 

Coast Guard assigned to units under the 

operational control of USCG Sector 

Lower Mississippi River. Persons or 

vessels seeking to enter the safety zones 

must request permission from the COTP 

or a designated representative on VHF– 

FM channel 16 or by telephone at 901– 

521–4822. If permission is granted, all 

persons and vessels shall comply with 

the instructions of the COTP or 

designated representative. The COTP or 

a designated representative will inform 

the public of the enforcement times and 

date for this safety zone through 

Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs), 

Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and/ 

or Marine Safety Information Bulletins 

(MSIBs), as appropriate. 

V. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

Executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes and 

Executive orders, and we discuss First 

Amendment rights of protestors. 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess the costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

This rule has not been designated a 

‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under 

Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, 

this rule has not been reviewed by the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). 

This regulatory action determination 

is based on the size, location, and 

duration of the safety zone. This 

emergency safety zone will temporarily 

restrict navigation on the RR at MM 58 

through 60 in the vicinity of Moncla, 

LA, from March 3, 2021 through March 

10, 2021. Moreover, The Coast Guard 

will issue Broadcast Notices to Mariners 

(BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners 

(LNMs), and/or Marine Safety 

Information Bulletins (MSIBs), as 

appropriate. The rule allows vessels to 

seek permission to enter the zone. 

B. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 

1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires Federal agencies to consider 

the potential impact of regulations on 

small entities during rulemaking. The 

term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

While some owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit the 

temporary safety zone may be small 

entities, for the reasons stated in section 

V.A above, this rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on any 

vessel owner or operator. 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule. If the rule 

would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 

1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). 

The Coast Guard will not retaliate 

against small entities that question or 

complain about this rule or any policy 

or action of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the National Government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that order and 

have determined that it is consistent 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 41 / Thursday, March 4, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 12545 

1See 47 CFR 0.271(c), 0.331(c), 0.261(b)(3). 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated 

implementing instructions, and 

Environmental Planning COMDTINST 

5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves a 

temporary safety zone on the RR at MM 

58 through 60 in the vicinity of Moncla, 

LA, that will prohibit entry into this 

zone. The safety zone will only be 

enforced while operations preclude the 

safe navigation of the established 

channel. It is categorically excluded 

from further review under paragraph 

L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS 

Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, 

Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental 

Consideration supporting this 

determination is available in the docket. 

For instructions on locating the docket, 

see the ADDRESSES section of this 

preamble. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 

1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T08–0125 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T08–0125 Safety Zone; Red River, 

Mile Marker 59, Moncla, LA. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

safety zone: All navigable waters of the 

Red River at Mile Marker (MM) 58 

through 60 in the vicinity of Moncla, 

LA. 

(b) Regulations. (1) Under the general 

safety zone regulations in subpart C of 

this part, you may not enter the safety 

zone described in paragraph (a) of this 

section unless authorized by the Captain 

of the Port Sector Lower Mississippi 

River (COTP) or the COTP’s designated 

representative. A designated 

representative is a commissioned, 

warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. 

Coast Guard assigned to units under the 

operational control of USCG Sector 

Lower Mississippi River. 

(2) To seek permission to enter, 

contact the COTP or the COTP’s 

representative via VHF–FM channel 16 

or by telephone at 901–521–4822. Those 

in the safety zone must comply with all 

lawful orders or directions given to 

them by the COTP or the COTP’s 

designated representative. 

(c) Eforcement period. This section 

will be enforced from March 3, 2021 

until March 10, 2021. 

(d) Information broadcasts. The COTP 

or a designated representative will 

inform the public of the enforcement 

times and date for this safety zone 

through Broadcast Notices to Mariners, 

Local Notices to Mariners, and/or Safety 

Marine Information Broadcasts, as 

appropriate. 

Dated: February 26, 2021. 

R.S. Rhodes, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Sector Lower Mississippi River. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04471 Filed 3–3–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 0 and 1 

[GN Docket No. 21–16; FCC 21–17; FRS 

17471] 

Delegations of Authority To Act on 

Applications for Review 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission 

(Commission) amends its organizational 

rules to codify a uniformly applicable 

standard for the exercise of delegated 

authority by staff Bureaus and Offices to 

dismiss procedurally defective 

Applications for Review. Bureaus and 

Offices will have clear authority to 

dismiss such applications that do not 

comply with procedural requirements. 

DATES: Effective April 5, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Konczal, Office of General 

Counsel, at David.Konczal@fcc.gov or 

(202) 418–1700. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s Order in 

GN Docket No. 21–16; FCC 21–17, 

adopted on January 13, 2021, and 

released on January 14, 2021. The 

complete text of this document can be 

located on the FCC website at https://

docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC21-17A1.pdf. 

Synopsis 

1. By this Order, we amend parts 0 

and 1 of the Commission’s rules to 

codify a uniformly applicable standard 

for the exercise of delegated authority 

by various Bureaus and Offices to 

dismiss Applications for Review that do 

not comply with the procedural 

requirements of 47 CFR 1.115(a), (b), (d), 

or (f). Our current rules delegating 

authority to the various Bureaus and 

Offices are inconsistent on this issue. 

The rules delegating authority to certain 

Bureaus and Offices provide them with 

authority to dismiss procedurally 

defective Applications for Review.1 The 

rules delegating authority to the other 


jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES