ENCLOSURE 2

State Implementation Plan Completeness Checklist
(page intentionally blank)
STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

Submittal of

Arizona State Implementation Plan Revision for the

MAG 2014 Eight-Hour Ozone Plan — Submittal ofMarginal Area Requirements for the

Maricopa Nonattainment Area

40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V, Criteria for Determining the Completeness of Plan Submissions, contains

the “minimum criteria for determining whether a State Implementation Plan submitted for consideration

by EPA is an official submission for purposes of review under §51.103,” Submission of plans,

preliminary review ofplans. Appendix V requires the following to be included in plan submissions for

review by EPA:

1. “A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA acceptance of

the plan or revision thereof (hereafter “the plan”).” [Appendix V, 2.1(a)]

See cover letter.

2. “Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued

the permit, order, consent agreement (hereafter “document”) in final form. That evidence shall

include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different

from the adoption/issuance date.” [Appendix V, 2.1(b)]

See cover letter.

3. “Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and

implement the plan.” [Appendix V, 2.1(c)]

See Enclosure 1.

4. “A copy of the actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by

reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made (such as,

redline/strikethrough) to the existing approved plan, where applicable ...“ [Appendix V, 2.1(d)]

See Enclosure 3.

5. “Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State’s laws and

constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan.” [Appendix V,

2.1(e)]

See cover letter and Enclosure 3, Appendix B, Exhibit 1: Public Hearing Process Documentation.

6. “Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures

approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice.” [Appendix V, 2.1(f)]

See Enclosure 3, Appendix B, Exhibit 1.
7. “Certification that public hearing(s) were held in accordance with the information provided in

the public notice and the State’s laws and constitution, if applicable and consistent with the

public hearing requirements in 40 CFR 51.102.” [Appendix V, 2.1(g)]

See Enclosure 3, Appendix B, Exhibit 1.

8. “Compilation of public comments and the State’s response thereto.” [Appendix V, 2.1(h)]

See Enclosure 3, Appendix B, Exhibit 1.

9. “Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan.” [Appendix V, 2.2(a)]

Ozone, ozone precursors.

10. “Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainmentlnonattainment

designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected areas(s).”

[Appendix V, 2.2 (b)]

See Enclosure 3.

11. “Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates

of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate,

quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the

differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the

revision.” [Appendix V, 2.2(c)]

See Enclosure 3.

12. “The State’s demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of

significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility,

as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. For all requests to

redesignate an area to attainment for a national primary ambient air quality standard, under

section 107 of the Act, a revision must be submitted to provide for the maintenance of the

national primary ambient air quality standards for at least 10 years as required by section 175A

of the Act.” [Appendix V, 2.2(d)]

See Enclosure 3.

13. “Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output

data, models used, justification of model selections, ambient monitoring data used,

meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models

used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the detennination of adequacy of the

modeling analysis.” [Appendix V, 2.2(e)]

See Enclosure 3.

14. “Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission

reduction technology.” [Appendix V, 2.2(f)]

See Enclosure 3.
15. “Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and

recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels.” [Appendix

V, 2.2(g)]

See Enclosure 3.

16. “Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determined in

practice.” [Appendix V, 2.2(h)]

See Enclosure 3.

17. “Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies, or

an explanation of why such justifications are not necessary.” [Appendix V, 2.2(i)]

No known deviation from EPA policy.