alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ahmet Dyrmyshi, Respondent, v Clifton Place Development Group, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Monticello Construction Corp., Appellant. (And Third-Party Actions.)

[776 NYS2d 811]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Monticello Construction Corp., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated March 26, 2003, as granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment against it on the issue of liability on the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1), and as failed to determine its cross motion to sever the second third-party action pursuant to CPLR 603.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as failed to determine the cross motion is dismissed, as that cross motion remains pending and undecided *(see Katz v Katz,*68 AD2d 536 [1976]); and it is further,

*565Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured while performing work on a construction project when the roof upon which he was working gave way and he fell through to the floor below. The defendant Monticello Construction Corp. (hereinafter Monticello) was a general contractor on the project. In opposition to the plaintiffs prima facie demonstration of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on his Labor Law § 240 cause of action, Monticello failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Taylor v V.A.W. of Am.,*276 AD2d 621 [2000]; *Charles v Eisenberg,*250 AD2d 801 [1998]; *Seguin v Massena Aluminum Recovery Co.,*229 AD2d 839 [1996]).

Monticello’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J.P., H. Miller, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
#### Robert L. Cantor, Appellant, v. Zita L. Loewe, Respondent.

Order, entered on November 18, 1963, denying summary judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion granted for the relief demanded in the complaint, with $10 costs. The action is on two promissory notes given in payment for the sale of stock. Execution and delivery are admitted. The defense asserted is an oral agreement that plaintiff would resign as an officer and would procure the *669resignation of another officer. This was not a condition of the sale or delivery of 'the notes. Being at best a condition subsequent, it is not provable by parol *(Jamestown Business Coll. Assn.*v. *Allen,*172 N. Y. 291; *Rhinock*v. *Simms,*226 App. Div. 313, affd. 253 N. Y. 602; *Solomon*v. *Van De Maele,*21 A D 2d 396). No triable issue is raised. Concur—Rabin, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Steuer and Staley, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, T. Paul Bulmahn, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ATP Oil & Gas Corporation; 

 

2**.**Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 30, 2005
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Birth Parents and Trauma Histories in the Child Welfare System      

# Birth Parents and Trauma Histories in the Child Welfare System

A guide released by The National Child Traumatic Stress Network, “Birth Parents and Trauma Histories in the Child Welfare System: A Guide for Resource Parents,” aims to help resource, or foster, parents to better understand the birth parents with whom they work.

http://nctsn.org/sites/default/files/assets/pdfs/birth_parents_trauma_resource_parent_final.pdf
#### Lenora L. Hughes, administratrix of the estate of Georgie Lee Hughes, deceased, appellant, v. Edward Prather, appellee.

Gen. No. 8,314.

Opinion filed May 21, 1931.

Roseoe Herget and George W. Hunt, for appellant.

Barnabas F. Sears, for appellep; Michel & Barnes, of counsel.

Per curiam.
#### In the Matter of Megan V. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; John V., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Angelica V. Suffolk *722County Department of Social Services, Respondent; John V, Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[776 NYS2d 518]

In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, inter alia, to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), entered January 6, 2003, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court entered November 13, 2002, made after a hearing, finding that he had permanently neglected the subject children, and, after a dispositional hearing, terminated his parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order entered November 13, 2002.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the evidence presented at the fact-finding hearing established that the Suffolk County Department of Social Services (hereinafter DSS) made diligent efforts to assist him in maintaining substantial contact with and planning for the future of his children *(see*Social Services Law 384-b [7] [a]; *cf. Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368, 373 [1984]). DSS, inter alia, provided the father with psychotherapy, parenting skills programs, housing services, and regularly-scheduled visitation with the children *(see Matter of Luno Scott A.,*292 AD2d 602, 603 [2002]). Despite DSS’s efforts, the father failed to make any progress and to regularly attend and comply with DSS’s programs. Thus, the Family Court’s finding that the father permanently neglected his children was supported by clear and convincing evidence that he failed to plan for their future *(see Matter of Joyce Marie B.,*305 AD2d 589, 590 [2003]; *Matter of Luno Scott A., supra).*

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., S. Miller, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Receipt of Reproductive Health Services Among Sexually Experienced Persons Aged 15–19 Years — National Survey of Family Growth, United States, 2006–2010

This report from the CDC analyzes 2006-2010 data from the National Survey of Family Growth to estimate the proportion of sexually experienced young people, ages 15-19, who received reproductive services during the past year. Results show that the majority of teens received a reproductive health service from a health care provider in the past 12 months and those with insurance coverage who received formal sex education and who spoke with a parent or guardian about any reproductive or sexual health topic, had the highest prevalence of receiving services. 

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/su6302a13.htm?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Empirical model development forpredicting shock response on composite materials subjected to pyroshock loading**
 
Volume01
Volume02: Part 2 | Part 3
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.15:2015-218781
Item Number:0830-D (online)
CGP systemNumber:000963498
 
October 19, 2018
#### 619.602 Procedures.
Exhibit 31.1  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, John W. Peters, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Suncrest Global Energy Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  September 24, 2007/s/ John W. Peters
John W. Peters
Principal Executive Officer
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 8 -00 728 -CV Charles Horak and Je nni fer Horak, Appellan ts

v. Lin da V. P erry and Kent P erry , Appellees F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF COM AL COUNTY , 274TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. C20 05-01 80C , HO NORAB LE JACK H. RO B ISO N , JUDGE PRESIDI NG M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Cha rl e s H or ak a

nd Jenn if e r H or ak h ave fi le d App e lla nt s’ Unop po se d M oti on

to Di smi ss A

pp e a l. We g ra

nt t he mot ion

and dis mis s th is a

pp e a l.

G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Waldrop and H enson Dismissed on Appellants’ Motion Filed: January

7, 2009
#### S. R. Burgoyne, appellee, v. J. L. Pyle et al., defendants, on appeal of Henry Baase et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 34,538.

Opinion filed April 15, 1931.

Nicholson, Crandall & Snyder, for appellants.

A. S. and E. W. Froehlieh, for appellee S. R. Burgoyne; John E. Owens, for appellee "William Borrmann; Clyde C. Fisher, of counsel.

Mr. Justice. Friend

delivered the opinion of the court.
Appeal Reinstated; Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Granted; Motion to Extend Time

to File Notice of Appeal and Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Denied as Moot; Appeal Dismissed ; and M emorandum Opinion filed November 13 , 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14
- 12
- 00475
- CV

ESTATE OF OTIS HAROL D CARTE, DECEASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR
- 0053835



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from a judgment removing appellant, K. Randall Huffstetler, as Independent Executor of the Estate of Otis Harold Carte, Deceased, signed by the trial court on January 23, 2012

. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial. The clerk’s record was filed Au gust 2, 2012 , and it appeared that appellant’s notice of appeal may have been filed late . Appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file the notice2

appeal , and a ppellee, Thomas H. Carte, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Before these motions were decided, o n August 30, 2012, the court abated the appeal for sixty days so that the parties could complete an agreement to settle the underlying dispute. On October 31, 2012, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal beca u se the case has been settled. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered reinstated and dismissed. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal and appellee’s motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby.
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First Valley Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J.
      Blum, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                Mark J. BlumMark
                J. BlumExecutive
                Vice President, Treasurerand
                CFO














The
      foregoing is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      is
      not being filed as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.











26
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1098 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 456
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 1098

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             August 1, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Peters, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 50 East Derry Road in East Derry, New Hampshire, as the ``Chief 
                    Edward B. Garone Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHIEF EDWARD B. GARONE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 50 East Derry Road in East Derry, New Hampshire, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Chief Edward B. Garone Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Chief 
Edward B. Garone Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 456

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 1098

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 50 East Derry Road in East Derry, New Hampshire, as the ``Chief 
                    Edward B. Garone Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### § 1006.5 Distributing plant.

See § 1000.5.