alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
09/08/201 0 10:2 1 816329410 6 SAD PAG E 02/0 7



# Par k Count ySheriff' s Offic e 140 2 Rive rVie wDriv e Cody , W Y8241 4 Scot t A . Steward-Sherif f (307)527-870 0 Augus t 16 , 201 0 WilliamD . Holde r Park County Sheriff s Offic e - Searc h& Rescu e Dept . 113 1 11"'Stree t

'" ' •.^i^,Q ] Cody , WY 8241 4 q j -lic5 $ Lesli e B . Taylo r

^'" ^ H'^S g Aerospac e Enginee r

p . >;:§— ' FAA , Smal l Airplan e Directorat e ^ - ^O ^ 6 5 90 1 Locus t

^ Regulation s & Polic y Branch , ACE-11 1 90 1 Locus t Kansa s City , M O 6410 6 Re : FAA-2010-009 0 Dea r Mr . Taylor : II I referenc e t o you r

reques t fo r additiona l informatio ndate dApri l 9,2010, 1 hav e bee nsuccessfu l i nobtainin g th e necessary informatio na s follows . 1 , D o th e wheel s aw i tire s hav e stati c loa drating s o f a t leas t 220 0 pounds . Yes . Th e wheel s an dtire s o nth e aircraf

t inquestio nar e th e identica l part s use db y th e manufacture r o nthei r curren t model s tha t

ar e certifie dat

th e requeste d220 0 poun dweight . Documentatio nattache dfor you r review . 2 , D o th e brake s hav e adesig nlandin g kineti c energ y equivalen t t o tha t neede dfo r

a220 0 poun dweight ? Yes . Th e brake s o nth e aircraf t inquestio nare th e identica l part s use db y th e manufacture r

o nthei r curren t model s tha t

ar e certifie da

t th e requeste d220 0 poun dwel^t . Documentatio nattache dfor you r revie w 3 , I s ther e a nAirplan e Fligh t Manua l tha t

show s th e takeof

f performanc e fo r

th e airplan e a t 220 0 pounds ? Yes . I hav e include dacop y o f th e Airplan e Fligh t

Manua l showin g takeof

f performance . Thank yo u agai nfor

you r tim e andconsideration . Sincerely , WilliamD . Holde r Searc h& Rescu e Pilo t 307/899-163 8 Enclosur e09/08/201 0 10:2 1 816329410 6 SA D PAG E 03/0 7



## ?! • 

# i

I —•r ^ ( n "< r < X

- t " « » ^> » ^ (tf ) eiOBisq o « O

S 0 1 eouBjai a09/08/201 0 10:2 1 816329410 6 SA D PAG E 04/0 7

S E



### a 

# s i
& c 

# I C

M

t * S S 

# i t 2* 3

l a d I. S j

- B B i ^ I ^ * i

. B

^ : Bs S ! r- 1 fs | r i V »

A " ^ 

### f S 2 f

/09/08/201 0 10:2 1 816329410 6 SA D PAG E 05/0 7



### I 

# I

0 

### s i

% 

# I

—M 

## §§lg§ § (y ) apBiaq o W0 9 o\«uBj« a09/08/201 0 10:2 1 816329410 6 SA D PAG E 06/0 7


# i \

• a 

## J

a

. 9 

## I 

# is l 

# I . a 

# I



# I S| 5

- 4 P. a 

# 11 1 1 

# I M s 

# H s 5 3 

## 1 1 ^ ® ® ® <3 € > (3 : 

### 4J ^ 

### ^ « ^. ^ 

# I T

# I I I

s ^ ? i f 

# 11 1 I I 

# i5"c ' i l l 

# I f 52

^ 3 

## 5|g 3 

# II I 

# h

» t « t

^ ^ 

# I09/08/201 0 10:2 1 816329410 6 SA D si ) ^ "I —

—^ v

» ^fcj ^ S ^ 1 0

' ^ 

### ? -

o u O b 

# I s s s £S ^ ^ PAG E 07/0 7

L U t/ 5 

### a

" ^
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Early Warning, Timely Response: A Guide to Safe Schools      

# Early Warning, Timely Response: A Guide to Safe Schools

Early Warning, Timely Response: A Guide to Safe Schools offers research-based practices designed to assist school communities identify these warning signs early and develop prevention, intervention and crisis response plans.

http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/osep/gtss.html
#### § 1220.112 Industry information.

The term *industry information* means information and programs that will lead to the development of new markets, new marketing strategies, or increased efficiency for the soybean industry, and activities to enhance the image of the soybean industry.
#### 9905.502-20 Purpose.

The purpose of this Standard is to require that each type of cost is allocated only once and on only one basis to any contract or other cost objective. The criteria for determining the allocation of costs to a contract or other cost objective should be the same for all similar objectives. Adherence to these cost accounting concepts is necessary to guard against the overcharging of some cost objectives and to prevent double counting. Double counting occurs most commonly when cost items are allocated directly to a cost objective without eliminating like cost items from indirect cost pools which are allocated to that cost objective.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           USDA Living Science      

# USDA Living Science

This website describes food, agriculture, and natural resource careers at the US Department of Agriculture.

http://www.agriculture.purdue.edu/usda/careers/
#### Gregg D. Wood, Appellant, v Pamela J. Wood, Respondent.

In a matrimonial action in which a judgment of divorce was entered, *inter alia,*awarding the defendant wife custody of the infant issue of the marriage, the plaintiff appeals from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 24, 1979, as (a) denied his application for a modification of the custody provisions of the judgment of divorce, and (b) awarded a counsel fee of $3,000 to defendant’s attorney for his opposition of said application, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered August 17, 1979, which, *inter alia,*granted defendant’s motion for entry of a money judgment of $3,000 for said counsel fee. Appeal from so much of the order as awarded a counsel fee to defendant’s attorney dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. That portion of the order was superseded by the judgment entered August 17, 1979. Order reversed insofar as it denied plaintiff’s application to modify the custody provisions of the judgment of divorce, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Special Term for a hearing to determine the best interests of the children and for a new determination on the application. Judgment entered August 17, 1979 reversed, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Special Term for a hearing to determine the relative financial circumstances of the parties so as to permit a proper allocation of the counsel fee of $3,000. The issue of custody of the parties’ children was not adjudicated at the time the plaintiff was granted a divorce. Indeed, the judgment of divorce, which incorporated the custody provisions contained in the separation agreement, provided that custody of the infant issue of the marriage be with the defendant, "without prejudice to the plaintiff’s right to apply to the Courts for custody.” Accordingly, plaintiff has the right to apply for custody at this time and to have a hearing to determine the best interests of the children (see *Richard L. v Joyce L.,*82 Mise 2d 649; see, also, *Guterding v Guterding,*55 AD2d 614). Special Term also decided to award a counsel fee in the matter solely on conflicting affidavits and written statements of financial worth. In the light of the holdings in Orr v *Orr*(440 US 268) and *Childs v Childs*(69 AD2d 406), we deem it necessary that a hearing be held to do justice between the contending parties. Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ishmael Israel, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 879]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated August 20, 2001 *(People v Israel,*294 AD2d 449 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 22, 1999.

Ordered that the application is denied.

*542The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see *Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]). Ritter, J.R, H. Miller, Krausman and Luciano, JJ., concur.
#### Charmaine Perkins et al., Appellants, v Maureen Murphy et al., Respondents.

[775 NYS2d 591]

In an action seeking to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated April 16, 2003, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court dated June 27, 2003, which is in favor of the defendants and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from the judgment is dismissed, as the judgment was superseded by the amended judgment; and it is fhrther,

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in precluding their counsel from using the verified answer of the defendant Maureen Murphy to impeach her credibility with respect to a collateral matter which *501had no relevance to any issue in the case (see *Feldsberg v Nitschke,*49 NY2d 636, 644 [1980]; *Prendergast v Patel,*301 AD2d 508 [2003]).

The plaintiffs’ challenge to the trial court limiting their attorney’s use of deposition testimony during cross-examination of witnesses is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The plaintiffs’ challenge to certain language set forth in the jury interrogatories is without merit, as the language was neither confusing nor misleading, and properly conveyed the issues in the case (see *Cea v Freed,*178 AD2d 397 [1991] ; *Zimmerman v Jamaica Hosp.,*143 AD2d 86 [1988]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contention is without merit. Krausman, J.P., Adams, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Nicor Inc.


Form 10-Q


Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nicor Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  November 2, 2010

/s/ RUSS M. STROBELRuss M. StrobelChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           OJJDP Bulletin: Deterrence Among High-Risk Adolescents      

# OJJDP Bulletin: Deterrence Among High-Risk Adolescents

OJJDP released “Studying Deterrence Among High-Risk Adolescents,” (PDF, 16 pages) the latest bulletin in the Pathways to Desistance series. This bulletin examines the link between perceptions of the threat of sanctions and deterrence from crime among high-risk adolescents. The authors’ findings show that severe punishment, such as correctional placement or a longer stay in correctional placement, does not meaningfully reduce juvenile offending or arrests among these youth. 

http://www.ojjdp.gov/pubs/248617.pdf?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal%20links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10528 

To exempt Federal actions related to energy and mineral activities on certain 

Federal lands from the requirements of the National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2024 

Ms. HAGEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To exempt Federal actions related to energy and mineral 

activities on certain Federal lands from the requirements 

of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NEPA EXEMPTION FOR FEDERAL ACTIONS RE4 LATED TO ENERGY AND MINERAL ACTIVITIES 

5 ON CERTAIN FEDERAL LANDS. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the fol7 lowing shall not be considered a major Federal action 

8 under section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 

9 Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)): 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 10528 IH

1 (1) Issuing, granting, or renewing a lease, ease2 ment, or right-of-way under the Mineral Leasing Act 

3 (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.) for the exploration, develop4 ment, or production of oil, gas, or coal. 

5 (2) Issuing, granting, or renewing a permit or 

6 other authorization under the Mining Law of 1872 

7 (30 U.S.C. 22 et seq.) for the exploration, location, 

8 development, or extraction of a critical mineral on 

9 land that is open to mineral entry. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Custom er Service Hotline: 1 - 800 - 438 - 2474 UNITED STA

TES ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A GENCY

REGION III 1650 A rch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 - 2029 

### October 27, 2010 Mr. David K. Pay lor , Director Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 629 East Main Street Richm ond, Virginia 23218 Dear Mr. Pay lor : On September 29 , 20 10 , t he U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
. Th is revision consists of a regulation (9VAC5 Chapter 30) that contains the ambient air quality standards set out in 40 CFR Part 50. The submittal added a lead standard of 1.5 μg/m 3 and related reference conditions, as well as updated the list of appendic es to 40 CFR Part 51 for documents incorporated by reference, 9VAC5
- 20
- 21
. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice
. If members of y our staff have any questions, they

may direct them to Ms. Irene Shandruk , Office of Air Program Planning, at 215
- 814
- 2166
. Sh e is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely , /s/ Diana Esher , Director A ir Protection Division
909.405 Effect of listing. ( e ) The Department of Energy may not solicit offers from, award contracts to or consent to subcontracts with contractors debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment unless the Senior Procurement Executive makes a written determination justifying that there is a compelling reason for such action in accordance with 48 CFR 9.405(a). For NNSA, the Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA) makes the written determination justifying the compelling reason.
( f ) DOE or NNSA may disapprove or not consent to the selection (by a contractor) of an individual to serve as a principal investigator, as a project manager, in a position of responsibility for the administration of Federal funds, or in another key personnel position, if the individual is listed in the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS).
( g ) DOE or NNSA shall not conduct business with an agent or representative of a contractor if the agent's or representative's name is listed in the EPLS.
( h ) DOE or NNSA shall review the EPLS before conducting a pre-award survey or soliciting proposals, awarding contracts, renewing or otherwise extending the duration of existing contracts, or approving or consenting to the award, extension, or renewal of subcontracts.
[76 FR 7691, Feb. 11, 2011]
AMERICAN AIRLINES 

December 14, 2010 

Paul L. Gretch 

Director, Office of International 

 Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

 Re: 30-Day Notice of American Airlines of Additional 

 Codesharing with Cathay Pacific (DOT-OST-2000-6824)

 

Dear Mr. Gretch: 

 American Airlines, Inc., under condition (b) of Notice of 

Action Taken issued in this docket on January 8, 2003, hereby 

provides notice that, no sooner than 30 days from today, American will display the CX* code of Cathay Pacific Airways, Ltd. on 

the following American-operated flights: 

 New York (JFK) – Sao Paulo (GRU) 

 New York (JFK) – Rio de Janeiro (GIG) 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 ______________________ 

 Carl B. Nelson 

Associate General Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5647 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

cc: Docket Branch 

 Service list 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

 I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing 

document by email on the following persons: 

 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dlalaw.com 

scott.mcclain@delta.com bill@mietuslaw.com 

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com 

kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

bkeiner@crowell.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com 

esahr@eckertseamons.com mcmillin@woa.com 

bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com eskraft@jamhoff.com 

jeffrey.manley@united.com dpdean@jamhoff.com 

bob.kneisley@wnco.com dkirstein@yklaw.com 

robert.land@jetblue.com jyoung@yklaw.com 

msinick@ssd.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov 

cdonley@ssd.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil 

gbleopard@fedex.com john.allen@faa.gov 

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com urskr@state.gov 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com recohn@hhlaw.com 

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com 

lhalloway@crowell.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com 

efaberman@wileyrein.com lachter@starpower.net 

mroller@rollerbauer.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com 

howard.kass@usairways.com rpommer@atlasair.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com gmurphy@crowell.com 

sophy.chen@hklaw.com russell.bailey@alpa.org 

david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com esahr@eckertseamons.com 

 

 

 _______________________________ 

 CARL B. NELSON 

December 14, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Juniper Partners Acquisition Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the ‘‘Report’’), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Robert B. Becker, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|        |  |  |                                                                                                             |  |  |                     |
|--------|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|---------------------|
| By:    |  |  | /s/ Robert B. Becker                                                                                        |  |  | Dated: May 15, 2007 |
|   |  |  | Robert B. Becker Interim Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |  |  |                |
|        |

----
#### § 1219.17 Order.

*Order* means this subpart.