alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.210 What does this subpart cover? ( a ) This subpart sets forth the procedures to be followed with respect to demands seeking official information or employee testimony relating to official information for use in a legal proceeding.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to: ( 1 ) Congressional requests or subpoenas for official information or testimony relating to official information;
( 2 ) Federal court civil proceedings in which the United States is a party;
( 3 ) Federal administrative proceedings in which the Department is a party;
( 4 ) The disclosure of official information or testimony relating to official information provided to other Federal agencies, including United States Department of Justice attorneys, in connection with a legal proceeding conducted on behalf of or in defense of the United States or a legal proceeding in which the United States has an interest; and
( 5 ) Employees who testify, while on their own time or in approved leave status, as private citizens as to facts or events that are not related to the official business of the Department.
( c ) Nothing in this subpart affects the rights, procedures, or Department regulations governing requests for, and release of, records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552), the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a), or the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b).
( d ) Nothing in this subpart affects procedures governing requests for authentication or certified copies of records under § 1.10.
( e ) Nothing in this subpart permits the Department or employees to disclose official in-formation or give testimony relating to official information if the disclosure or testimony is protected or prohibited by statute or other applicable law.
( f ) This subpart only provides guidance for the internal operations of the Department, and neither creates nor is intended to waive the sovereign immunity of the United States or create any enforceable right or benefit against the United States.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Webinar: Tribal Technical Advisory Committee Meeting      

# Webinar: Tribal Technical Advisory Committee Meeting

**Date:** February 27, 2024, 8:00 am–5:00 pm ET **Location:** 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 5th Floor, 5W07 

During this meeting, delegates from SAMHSA’s Tribal Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) and SAMHSA leadership will discuss programs, initiatives and Tribal behavioral health priorities for the upcoming year. **Learn more and register.**
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Edgen
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Laxton, III, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 23, 2006



|    |  |                                             
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ DAVID L. LAXTON, III                    
|    |  | David L. Laxton, III Chief Financial
Officer



39
Exhibit
15.1. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We
have reviewed the accompanying balance sheet of Revelstoke Industries, Inc. (a
development stage company) as of November 30, 2005 and the related statement of
operations for the three and six months ended November 30, 2005 and the
statement of cash flows for the three and six month periods ended November 30,
2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management.

We
conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making
inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based
on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be
made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We
have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the balance sheet of Revelstoke
Industries, Inc. (a development stage company) as of May 31, 2005 and the
related statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders equity for
the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated July 14,
2005, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying balance sheet as of May
31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the balance
sheet from which it has been derived.

Note 1
of the Companys audited financial statements as of May 31, 2005, and for
the year then ended discloses that the Company has suffered recurring losses
from operations and has no established source of revenue at May 31, 2005. Our
auditors report on those financial statements includes an explanatory
paragraph referring to the matters in Note 1 of those financial statements and
indicating that these matters raised substantial doubt about the Companys
ability to continue as a going concern. As indicated in Note 1 of the
Companys unaudited interim financial statements as of November 30, 2005,
and for the three and six months then ended, the Company has continued to suffer
recurring losses from operations and still has no established source of revenue
at November 30, 2005. The accompanying interim financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Respectfully
Submitted,

/s/    MacKay
LLP, Chartered AccountantsVancouver, British Columbia, Canada

January 19, 2006
**EXHIBIT 99.906 CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuantto Section 906**

**ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**Registrant:Nicholas Fund, Inc.**

**Form:N-CSR Semiannual Report dated March 31, 2024**

 

I, David O. Nicholas, hereby certify thatto the best of my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

| Date:  | 05/30/2024                                              |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ David O.  Nicholas                                  |   |
|   | David O.  Nicholas, President (Chief Executive Officer) |   |

 

I, Jennifer R. Kloehn, hereby certify thatto the best of my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

| Date:  | 05/30/2024                                               |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ Jennifer R.  Kloehn                                  |   |
|   | Jennifer R.  Kloehn, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) |   |

 

 

*This certificate is furnished pursuant to therequirements of Form N-CSR and shall not be deemed "filed" forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934.*
EXHIBIT 9
                                                Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP


                             Petrofund Energy Trust
                                    Form 40-F

We consent to the use of our report dated February 6, 2004, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Petrofund Energy Trust as of and for the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (which audit report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the 2001
financial statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased
operations) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Petrofund Energy
Trust for the year ended December 31, 2003.



Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Alberta, Canada`
March 15, 2004
[The above photo was enlarged and made life size, and placed on a meeting room wall. ]

[The above photo was enlarged and made life size, and placed on a meeting room wall. ][The right portion of the above photo was enlarged and made life size, and placed on a meeting room

wall. ] [The above photo was enlarged and made life size, and placed on a meeting room wall. ][The above photo was enlarged and made life size, and placed on a meeting room wall. ]

[The above photo was enlarged and made life si ze, and placed on a meeting room wall. ]
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Harvard Bioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Numbers 333-53848, 333-104544, 333-135418 and 333-151003 on Form S-8 of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report datedMarch 16, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity andcomprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and our report dated March 16, 2011 with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2010, which reports appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 16, 2011
719.273-4 Eligibility of Mentor and Protégé firms. Eligible business entities approved as Mentors may enter into agreements (hereafter referred to as “Mentor-Protégé Agreement” or “Agreement” and explained in section 719.273-6) with eligible Protégés. Mentors provide appropriate developmental assistance to enhance the capabilities of Protégés to perform as contractors and/or subcontractors. Eligible small business entities capable of providing developmental assistance may be approved as Mentors. Protégés may participate in the Program in pursuit of a prime contract or as subcontractors under the Mentor's prime contract with the USAID, but are not required to be a subcontractor to a USAID prime contractor or be a USAID prime contractor. Notwithstanding eligibility requirements in this section, USAID reserves the right to limit the number of participants in the Program in order to insure its effective management of the Mentor-Protégé Program. ( a ) *Eligibility.* A Mentor: ( 1 ) May be either a large or small business entity;
( 2 ) Must be eligible for award of Government contracts;
( 3 ) Must be able to provide developmental assistance that will enhance the ability of Protégés to perform as prime contractors or subcontractors; and
( 4 ) Will be encouraged to enter into arrangements with entities with which it has established business relationships.
( b ) *Eligibility.* A Protégé: ( 1 ) Must be a small business, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBZone, small socially and economically disadvantaged business, and women-owned small business);
( 2 ) Must meet the size standard corresponding to the NAICS code that the Mentor prime contractor believes best describes the product or service being acquired by the subcontract; and
( 3 ) Eligible for award of Government contracts.
( c ) Protégés may have multiple Mentors. Protégés participating in Mentor-Protégé programs in addition to USAID's Program should maintain a system for preparing separate reports of Mentoring activity so that results of the USAID Program can be reported separately from any other agency program.
( d ) A Protégé firm shall self-certify to a Mentor firm that it meets the requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section and possess related certifications granted by the Small Business Administration (e.g., HUBZone, 8(a), etc.). Mentors may rely in good faith on written representations by potential Protégés that they meet the specified eligibility requirements. HUBZone and small disadvantaged business status eligibility and documentation requirements are determined according to 13 CFR part 124.
[49 FR 13243, Apr. 3, 1984, as amended at 79 FR 74988, Dec. 16, 2014]
#### § 1212.105 Ballots.

The referendum agent and subagents shall accept all ballots cast. However, if an agent or subagent deems that a ballot should be challenged for any reason, the agent or subagent shall endorse above their signature, on the ballot, a statement to the effect that such ballot was challenged, by whom challenged, the reasons therefore, the results of any investigations made with respect thereto, and the disposition thereof. Ballots invalid under this subpart shall not be counted.
#### § 1131.42 Classification of transfers and diversions.

See § 1000.42.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of William Hicks, Respondent: Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent; Rochester Turners, Inc., Appellant. In the Matter of Rochester Turners, Inc., Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Motion granted, and Edward Nelson, Esq., 35 No. Broad St., Norwich, N. Y., is hereby appointed counsel.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 1, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00611

- CV

Jose Pablo Cortina

- Pineda , Appellant

v.

Courtney Cortina

- Pineda , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEF ORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the decree of divorce signed by the tr i a l court on October 22, 2021

.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no

reversible error in the decree

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s divorce decree

.

Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
#### § 1.344 Deposit to Treasury of the United States.

All amounts collected pursuant to this subpart shall be deposited as miscellaneous receipts in the Treasury of the United States.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 41 (Thursday, March 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 12685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04488]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than March 19, 2021.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. The Dreiseszun Grandchildren Trust, the Helene Kramer Trust, the 
Chad M. Feingold Grantor Trust, the Chad M. Feingold Irrevocable 
Insurance Trust, the Erika R. Feingold Irrevocable Insurance Trust, the 
Erika R. Feingold Grantor Trust, the Jeremy Morgan Family Irrevocable 
Trust, the Marilyn J. Feingold Trust #2, the Mark A. Morgan Family 
Irrevocable Trust, the Mark A. Morgan Trust #2, the Michael B. Morgan 
Trust #2, the Thomas S. Morgan Family Irrevocable Trust, the Thomas S. 
Morgan Trust #2, the Timothy Morgan Irrevocable Trust, the Todd D. 
Morgan Trust #2, the Avi Velasquez Irrevocable Trust, the Marley Blake 
Velasquez Irrevocable Trust, and the Mia M. Velasquez Irrevocable 
Trust, Gregory Sherman, as trustee or co-trustee, all of Overland Park, 
Kansas; to become members of the Sherman Control Group, a group acting 
in concert, to retain voting shares of Valley View Bancshares, Inc., 
Overland Park, Kansas, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of 
Security Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 1, 2021.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-04488 Filed 3-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
46 So.2d 315

#### STATE v. SCOTT.

No. 39767.

April 24, 1950.

Fuller & Harrison, Winnfield, for defendant-appellant.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sam L. Wells, Dist. Atty., Colfax, for appellee.

MOISE, Justice.

The defendant is appealing .suspensively from a judgment of conviction and sentence under a bill of information charging him with having violated the Local Option Ordinance of The Police Jury of Winn Parish. He was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of 5 months and fined $500.00.

The bill of information was filed on June 27, 1949. On July 15, 1949, counsel for the accused filed a motion that the trial judge recuse himself, and that the motion to recuse be tried by another judge. The motion to recuse was denied. The case went to trial and the accused was found guilty as charged. A motion for a new trial was overruled.

The transcript of the record does not' contain the written motion to recuse, nor does it show the evidence and testimony submitted on the trial of the motion to recuse.

At the time this case was set for argument and the record filed in this Court, defendant filed a motion for a continuance and order to remand for completion of the transcript of appeal. The case was submitted and the defendant was granted permission to amplify the record, as well as *417time in which to file a typewritten brief. Our Clerk’s office used every endeavor to obtain the amplification of the record without avail. On April 13, 1950, he received a letter from defendant’s attorney which, in part, reads:

> “I have decided to submit the case of State against Frank Scott, appealed from the Parish of Winn, on the record as it stands, * * * No brief will be filed on behalf of the defendant under the circumstances, but I wish the Court to know that the right granted the defendant to file a typewritten brief was appreciated.”

The appellant having been granted time to amplify and complete the transcript in compliance with the provisions of Act No. 234 of 1932, and having failed to do so, the appeal should be dismissed. Smith v. Atkins, 215 La. 310, 40 So.2d 475.

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/23

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL