alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: 2022 Victims of Child Abuse Act Report to Congress      

# Resource: 2022 Victims of Child Abuse Act Report to Congress

This report (PDF, 12 pages) provides information about the Victims of Child Abuse Act (VOCA) Programs administered by the OJJDP. The goal of these VOCA-funded programs is to improve the community response to child abuse through strategic leadership, collaboration, and capacity building. OJJDP’s VOCA initiatives provide focused support at the local, regional, and national levels to maximize the impact of services for child victims of abuse and ensure access to services and TTA for communities and involved professionals. **Learn more.**
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, David T.
McGraw, certify that:

1.   I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Communications Systems,
Inc.;

2.   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

|                         |    |                         
|------------------------ | -- | ------------------------
|                         | By | /s/ David T.
 McGraw    
|                         |    | David T.
 McGraw        
|Date:
 November 12, 2009 |    | Chief
 Financial Officer

29

---
#### § 1160.104 United States.

*United States* means the 48 contiguous states in the continental United States and the District of Columbia, except that United States means the 50 states of the United States of America and the District of Columbia under the following provisions: the petition and review under section 1999K of the Act, enforcement under section 1999L of the Act, and investigations and power to subpoena under section 1999M of the Act.
PUBLIC LAW 109–153—DEC. 30, 2005 119 STAT. 2889

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 652:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–147 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 151 (2005):

Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

Dec. 18, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–153

109th Congress

An Act

To provide financial assistance for the rehabilitation of the Benjamin Franklin

National Memorial in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the development of an

exhibit to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the birth of Benjamin Franklin.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Benjamin Franklin National

Memorial Commemoration Act of 2005’’.

SEC. 2. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN NATIONAL MEMORIAL.

The Secretary of the Interior may provide a grant to the

Franklin Institute to—

(1) rehabilitate the Benjamin Franklin National Memorial

(including the Franklin statue) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;

and

(2) develop an interpretive exhibit relating to Benjamin

Franklin, to be displayed at a museum adjacent to the Benjamin

Franklin National Memorial.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appropriated to

carry out this Act $10,000,000.

(b) REQUIRED MATCH.—The Secretary of the Interior shall

require the Franklin Institute to match any amounts provided

to the Franklin Institute under this Act.

Approved December 30, 2005.

Benjamin

Franklin

National

Memorial

Commemoration

Act of 2005.

Dec. 30, 2005

[S. 652]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7390

ELWALDO R. JAMES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF ROCK HILL; ROCK HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT; ROBERT M. STEWARTS, Detective Sergeant,

City of Rock Hill Police Department; CLIFTON

D. RUSSELL; CLYDE C. LONG; ROBERT M. STEWART,

Chief, State Law Enforcement Division; BETTY

JOE RHEA, Mayor, City of Rock Hill; JOE B.

LANFORD; JOHN DOES, 8-15, City Council of Rock

Hill; JANE DOES, 8-15, City Council of Rock

Hill; ROCK HILL CITY COUNCIL; JAMES THICKENS,

Detective Sergeant, City of Rock Hill Police

Department,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-2890-2-6AJ)

Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Elwaldo R. James, Appellant Pro Se. Donna Seegars Givens, WOODS &

GIVENS, L.L.P., Lexington, South Carolina; Terry B. Millar, Rock

Hill, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Elwaldo R. James appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint and on

his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the

record, the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate

judge’s recommendation to deny § 1983 relief, and the court’s opinion denying the Rule 59(e) motion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

James v. City of Rock Hill, No. CA-98-2890-2-6AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 24 &

Sept. 10, 1999). We deny James’ motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 1200.203 Initial referendum.

For the purpose of ascertaining whether the persons to be covered by an order favor the order going into effect, the Administrator may conduct an initial referendum among persons to be subject to an assessment under the order who, during a representative period determined by the Administrator, engaged in the production or handling of the agricultural commodity or the importation of the agricultural commodity.
##### 



Exhibit 32-4

Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Commonwealth Edison
Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, that
(i) the report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Commonwealth Edison Company.

|                     |  |                                                                                                       
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2004 |  | /s/ J. BARRY MITCHELLJ. Barry MitchellSenior Vice President, Treasurer and
    Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Jeffrey Greene, Respondent, v Tyhese Gordon, Appellant. In the Matter of Tyhese Gordon, Appellant, v Jeffrey Greene, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 73]

In two related proceedings, inter alia, pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 for child custody, the mother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Freeman, J.), dated December 2, 2002, as, after a hearing, transferred custody of the parties’ child to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The conclusion of the Family Court that a transfer of custody of the parties’ child to the father was in the best interests of the child has a sound and substantial basis in the record *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 174 [1982]). The Family Court carefully considered numerous factors, including the relative fitness of the parents, the original placement of the child and the length of that placement, abduction, or defiance of legal process, and the quality of the home environment. The Family *529Court also took into account the existence of siblings, the parents’ financial status, parental guidance, and the parents’ ability to provide for the child’s emotional and intellectual functioning *(see Eschbach v Eschbach, supra*at 172-173; *Matter of Garvin v Garvin,*176 AD2d 318, 319 [1991]). In addition, the Family Court considered the recommendations of the court-appointed forensic psychologist and the child’s Law Guardian, both of whom recommended that custody be awarded to the father *(see Young v Young,*212 AD2d 114,118-119 [1995]). While the child was in her custody, the mother was openly hostile toward the father, deliberately frustrated and interfered with the father’s visitation rights, filed petty or baseless violation petitions, made false allegations of child neglect, and instigated a physical altercation with the father’s wife in front of the child. Such conduct is inconsistent with the best interests of the child *(see Matter of Fallon v Fallon,*4 AD3d 426 [2004]; *David K. v Iris K.,*276 AD2d 421, 422 [2000]; *Miller-Presutti v Presutti,*257 AD2d 562, 563 [1999]; *Young v Young, supra*at 122-123). The father is the parent who is more likely to assure meaningful contact between the child and the noncustodial parent *(see Matter of Dobbins v Vartabedian,*304 AD2d 665, 666 [2003]). Under these circumstances, we decline to disturb the Family Court’s custody award, which has a sound and substantial basis in the record. Smith, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32-4** **Certificate    Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of    Title 18 United States Code**     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the quarterly    report on    Form 10-Q    of Exelon Generation Company, LLC for the quarterly period ended    June 30, 2007, that (i) the report fully complies with    the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information    contained in the report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of    Exelon Generation Company, LLC. /s/  John    F. Young    John F. Young    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date: July 25, 2007
DISMISS; Opinion Filed November 19, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00426-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.D.F., III, C.M.F., J.W.F., AND A.K.F., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-08-21910-U

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices FitzGerald, Francis, and Myers

Opinion by Justice Myers

Although the clerk’s record in this appeal was prepared in March 2013, it has not been 

filed because appellant has failed to pay the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a). By letter dated 

October 15, 2013, appellant was directed to file, within ten days, written verification that she had 

paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee. Appellant was cautioned that, if the required 

verification was not filed within the time specified, the Court might dismiss the appeal for want 

of prosecution. See id. 37.3(b). To date, appellant has not responded, and the clerk’s record has 

not been filed. Because nothing in our records reflects appellant is excused by statute or rule 

from paying the clerk’s fee, and she has failed to pay the fee, we dismiss the appeal. See id.

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

130426F.P05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF J.D.F., III, C.M.F., 

J.W.F., AND A.K.F., CHILDREN

No. 05-13-00426-CV

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-08-21910-U.

Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. 

Justices FitzGerald and Francis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

We ORDER that appellee Kelly Reese Fisher recover his costs, if any, of this appeal 

from appellant Colleen Marie Fisher.

Judgment entered this 19th day of November, 2013.

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Summer Food Service Program      

# Resource: Summer Food Service Program

This website provides information on the Summer Food Service Program (SFSP), which provides nutritious meals to low-income children when school is not in session. Local organizations can use this website to learn how to be a part of the program. Families can use the search tool to find local sites serving meals.**Learn more.**
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

(Principal Financial Officer)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chaparral Steel Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Celtyn Hughes, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: January 13, 2006



/s/    J. CELTYN HUGHESJ. Celtyn HughesPrincipal Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00284-CV

Wilson B. Hudson, Appellant

v.

Digicon Corporation, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 99-02207A, HONORABLE CHARLES F. CAMPBELL, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING 

Appellant Wilson B. Hudson and appellee Digicon Corporation have filed a joint

motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)(2).

 

Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: February 28, 2002

Do Not Publish
#### Victor Nikolayevich AVANESOV, Petitioner, v. Peter D. KEISLER,* Acting Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-73085.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 5, 2007.**

Filed Nov. 5, 2007.

Sharon M. Dulberg, Esq., McVey Mullery & Dulberg, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, WWS-District Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Office of the District Counsel, Seattle, WA, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Esq., Cindy S. Ferrier, Esq., R. Lynne Harris, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: HUG, THOMAS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 Peter D. Keisler is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Acting Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ***

The oral argument scheduled in this case for November 7, 2007 is vacated.

*667Pursuant to the motion by the Attorney General, we vacate the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) in this case and remand the petition for review to the BIA so that it may consider Petitioner Avanesov’s claim that the immigration judge was biased and that said bias resulted in the denial of his procedural due process right to a full and fail1 hearing. This remand is without prejudice and does not preclude either party from presenting any other issue raised in the petition for review in any future proceeding.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### § 1207.534 OMB control number assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 and have been assigned OMB Control number 0581-0093.

[49 FR 23826, June 8, 1984]