alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1105 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 246
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1105

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            November 14 (legislative day, November 13), 2023

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to 
 reauthorize the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debbie Smith Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 2(j) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 
(34 U.S.C. 40701(j)) is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2019 through 
2024'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2024 through 2029''.

SEC. 3. AUDITS TO PROTECT INTEGRITY OF GRANT AWARDS.

    Section 2(c)(4) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 
(34 U.S.C. 40701(c)(4)) is amended by striking ``2022'' and inserting 
``2029''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             KEVIN F. MCCUMBER,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 246

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1105

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to 
 reauthorize the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

            November 14 (legislative day, November 13), 2023

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Timothy DRUMMOND, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-14770

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

June 17, 2008.

Susan Hollis Rothstein-Youakim, U.S. Attorney’s Office/ Middle Dist. of FL, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James H. Burke, Jr., Federal Public Defender, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant Appellant.

Before CARNES, BARKETT and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

James H. Burke, appointed counsel for William Timothy Drummond in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 *932S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Drummond’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 13.1




                        CERTIFICATION OF DOUGLAS TURNBULL
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 13.1




    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection  with the Annual Report of Centrasia  Mining Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the year ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Douglas  Turnbull,
Chief  Executive  Officer,  President  and  Director  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be  retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its staff upon
request.



/s/ Douglas Turnbull
----------------------------------
Douglas Turnbull,
Chief Executive Officer, President
and Director

<PAGE>
merex106.htm






  





  


 





  








AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE ADVISORY AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT NO. 2 dated as of the 1st day of January 2013 to the ADVISORY AGREEMENT made as of the 30th day of April, 2007, among CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC (formerly Demeter Management Corporation), a Delaware limited liability company (the “Trading Manager”), MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY KAISER I, LLC (formerly Morgan Stanley Managed Futures Kaiser I, LLC), a Delaware limited liability company (the “Trading Company”) and KAISER TRADING GROUP PTY. LTD., a private company organized under the laws of Australia (the “Trading Advisor”), as previously amended by an Amendment to the Advisory Agreement dated as of March 1, 2012 (together the “Agreement”).


 







 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, the Trading Manager, the Trading Company and the Trading Advisor wish to amend the Advisory Agreement to increase the amount of leverage used to manage the Trading Company’s assets.


 


NOW, therefore, the parties agree as follows:


 


1. The first sentence of Section 2(f) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:


 


In performing services to the Trading Company, the Trading Advisor shall utilize its Global Diversified Program (the “Trading Program”), as described in the Disclosure Document, and as modified from time to time; provided, however, that the Trading Manager and the Trading Company agree that amount of leverage applied to the assets of the Trading Company allocated to the Trading Advisor by the Trading Manager shall be 2.0 times the assets of the Trading Company allocated to the Trading Advisor by the Trading Manager (the “Trading Level”), unless otherwise agreed by the parties hereto in writing.  The Trading Advisor shall trade the Trading Company’s assets on the basis of the Trading Level.


 


2. The first sentence of Section 5(a)(i) shall be deleted and replaced by the following:


 


The Trading Company shall pay the Trading Advisor a monthly management fee equal to 1/12 of 2% (a 2% annual rate) of the Net Assets (as defined in Section 5(c) hereof) as of the first day of each month (the “Management Fee”).


 


3. In all other respects the Advisory Agreement remains unchanged and of full force and effect.


 




  





  











  






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as of the day and year first above written.


 


CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC












By                                                                        


Walter Davis


President







MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY KAISER I, LLC 







By:  Ceres Managed Futures LLC


(Trading Manager)












By                                                                        


Walter Davis


President












KAISER TRADING GROUP PTY. LTD.












By                                                                           


Karl O’Shaughnessy


Director


 


 


 


- 2 -
#### § 1206.24 [Reserved]
#### 9905.501-61 Interpretation. [Reserved]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               2,695,957
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                    729,583
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                  489,100
<OTHER-ASSETS>                            129,213
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          4,043,853
<COMMON>                                      539
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                 411,459
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                       674,830
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>          1,086,828
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                60,858
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                    1,211,427
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                        180,896
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>              31,871
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>          1,471,973
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>           4,043,853
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                 619,760
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                       11,671
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                570,746
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                582,417
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                    37,343
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                            745
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>             38,088
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   19,769
<NET-INCOME>                               18,319
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 1,063
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>              17,256
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   36,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   6,437
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                    213,390
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.00


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of VillageEDOCS (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                    Date: May 26, 2006
                          ------------          ------------------------------
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO VILLAGEEDOCS AND WILL BE RETAINED
BY VILLAGEEDOCS AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS
STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00662-CR

James Fuller FITZGERALD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-12-112

The Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

REVERSED, and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court for a new trial.

SIGNED July 30, 2014.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Systems Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, AJ Vesak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 11th day of March, 2007.

BY:
/s/ AJ VESAK                        Alexander Vesak, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**
§ 1160.603 Who may vote. ( a ) Each person who was a fluid milk processor during the representative period, as determined by the Secretary, and who at the time of voter registration and when voting is processing and marketing commercially fluid milk products in consumer-type packages in the United States shall be entitled to vote in a referendum, and no such person shall be refused a ballot. Any person casting more than one ballot with conflicting votes shall thereby invalidate all ballots cast by such person in such referendum. Each person voting shall have registered with the referendum agent prior to the voting period. Each ballot cast shall contain a certification by the person casting the ballot that such person is qualified to vote. All information required on the ballot pertinent to the identification of the person voting must be supplied and certified to as being correct in order for the ballot to be valid.
( b ) Voting by proxy or agent will not be permitted. However, the ballot of a fluid milk processor who is other than an individual may be cast by a person who is duly authorized to do so, and such ballot shall contain a certification by such person that the entity on whose behalf the ballot is cast was a fluid milk processor during the representative period. All information required on the ballot pertinent to the identification of the fluid milk processor on whose behalf the ballot is cast must be supplied and certified to as being correct in order for the ballot to be valid.
## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________



### m 99-60142

_______________



### U NITED 

### S TATES OF 

### A MERICA



### , Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS



### R OY 

### D IXON AND 

### R OBERT 

### W ILLIAMS



### , Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:98-CR-89)

_________________________ April 4, 2000

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

R oy Dixon and Robert Williams app eal their Hobbs Act convictions. Their main issue is sufficiency of the evidence. They claim the relevant em

ployees of Time Warner had no

reason to fear them and that Time Warner had

no fear of present loss. Our review of the record reveal s more than sufficient evidence from which the ju ry could have found such reasonable fear from defendants’ actions.

* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR. R. 47.5, the court has
determined that this opinion sho uld not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.2

The indictment is not fatally defect i ve. Defendants cannot show prejudice from the designation of the victim corpor a tion in the indictment.

The co nvictions are constitutional under United Stat e s v. Lopez

. Moreover, no aggregation is required under the statute in question, even if defend ant s properly raised this issue in the district c ourt. There i s no reversible error in allowing Tommy H arri s to testify as he did. The denial of the bill of particulars was proper. There is no reversible

error regarding juror misconduct, whic h defendants knew about long before they called it to the court’s attention. The instructions to the jury were proper.

AFFIRMED.
# DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

Standard Operating Permit Condition X

– Reasonable Precautions to Prevent Fugitive Dust

Permit Condition for Air Quality Permits

Adopted by Reference in 18 AAC 50.346

April 1, 2002

Revised September 27, 2010Standard Operating Permit Condition X

– Fugitive Dust April 1, 2002

Revised September 27, 2010 2 

## Standard Operating Permit Condition X

– Reasonable Precautions to Prevent Fugitive Dust

Emission Units or Stationary Sources : This Condition Applies to: A stationary source containing any of the following:
a. coal fired boilers; b. coal handling equipme nt ; c. construction of gravel pads or roads that are part of a permitted stationary source , or other construction that has the potential to generate fugitive dust that reaches ambient air; d. commercial, industrial, municipal solid waste, air curtain, and medical waste incinerators; e. sewage sludge incinerators not using wet methods to handle the ash; f. mines; g. urea manufacturing; h. soil remediation units;

i. dirt or gravel roads under the control of the operator with frequent vehicle traffic; j. other emission units the department finds are likely to generate fugitive dust.

The department will use standard permit condition X in an operating permit for any of the emission units

listed in a.

– j, above, unless the department determines that emission unit or stationary source specific conditions more adequately meet the requirements of 18 AAC 50 or the department determines that the stationary source has no potential to cause fug itive dust problems.

Circumstances where emission unit or stationary source specific conditions more adequately meet 18 AAC 50 include:

1 problems persist after a complaint; or

2 the need for a dust control plan or other specific requirements is foreseeable due to stationary

source specific circumstances.

Permit Wording:



### 1. A person who causes or permits bulk materials to be handled, transported, or stored, or who engages

in an ind ustrial activity or construction project shall take reasonable precautions to prevent particulate matter from being emitted into the ambient air. (18 AAC 50.045(d))

.

1.1 The permittee shall keep records of:

a. complaints received by the permittee and complaints r eceived by the department and conveyed to the permittee; and

b. any additional precau tions that are taken

(i) to address complaints described in condition X.1.1a or to address the results of department inspections that found potential problems; and

(ii) to prevent future dust problems.Standard Operating Permit Condition X

– Fugitive Dust April 1, 2002

Revised September 27, 2010 3 1.2 The permittee shall report according to condition <insert cross reference to standard permit condition II

- air pollution prohibited>.
EXHIBIT 15








May 14, 2001










Ohio Edison Company
76 South Main Street
Akron, OH  44308

Gentlemen:

We are aware that Ohio Edison Company has incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statements No. 33-49135, No. 33-49259, No. 33-49413, No. 33-
51139, No. 333-01489 and No. 333-05277 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2001, which includes our report dated May 14, 2001 covering the
unaudited interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to
Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a
part of the registration statements prepared or certified by our firm or a
report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7
and 11 of the Act.

                                        Very truly yours,





                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
#### § 1.818 Additional documents to be filed with hearing clerk.

In addition to the documents or papers required or authorized by the foregoing provisions of this subpart to be filed with the hearing clerk, the hearing clerk shall receive for filing and shall have custody of all papers, reports, records, orders, and other documents which relate to the administration of any order and which the Secretary is required to issue or to approve.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
     a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or cause such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: January 29, 2009/s/ Peter K. BakerChief Executive Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of 4C Controls Inc.
      on
      Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Olivier de
      Vergnies, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:





(1) 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      September 10, 2008




By:
            /s/
                Olivier de VergniesName:   
                Olivier de VergniesTitle:     
                Principal Executive Officer