alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 15






November 12, 2001







The Cleveland Electric
Illuminating Company
76 South Main Street
Akron, OH  44308

Gentlemen:

We are aware that The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company has
incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements No. 33-55513,
No. 333-47651, No. 333-72891 and No. 333-64776 its Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2001, which includes our report dated November
12, 2001 covering the unaudited interim financial information contained
therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that
report is not considered a part of the registration statements prepared or
certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within
the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                   Very truly yours,





                                    ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


                                  55

<PAGE>
#### Ideal Toy Corporation, Respondent, v Bank of Tokyo Trust Company et al., Defendants, and Whitehall Finance, Ltd., Appellant.

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 11, 1979, affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Fein, J. P., Bloom and Ross, JJ.

Silverman and Yesawich, JJ.,

dissent in the following memorandum by Silverman, J.: We would reverse the confirmation of the attachment against defendant-appellant Whitehall Finance, Ltd. and would vacate the attachment as against that defendant. On the facts of this case we do not think that respondent has met the requirement of CPLR 6212 (subd [a]) of showing "that it is probable that the plaintiff will succeed on the merits” as against this defendant-appellant.
#### § 1210.607 Confidential information.

All ballots cast and their contents and all other information or reports furnished to, compiled by, or in possession of, the referendum agent or subagents that reveal, or tend to reveal, the identity or vote of any producer, handler, or importer of watermelons shall be held strictly confidential and shall not be disclosed.
89–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–984

PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO

SUSPEND THE RULES

OCTOBER 17, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 633]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 633, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that suspensions will be in order at any

time on or before the legislative day of Friday, October 20, 2000.

The object of any motion to suspend the rules shall be announced

from the floor at least 90 minutes prior to its consideration. The

rule further provides that the Speaker or his designee will consult

with the Minority Leader or his designee on any suspension considered under this resolution. Finally, the resolution lays House Resolution 615 on the table.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-21061

Summary Calendar

 

RUSTY S. NICHOLS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-00-CV-3344

- - - - - - - - - -

June 27, 2002

Before JOLLY, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rusty S. Nichols appeals the magistrate judge’s judgment

affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s decision to deny him

disability benefits. He argues that the Administrative Law Judge

(“ALJ”) erred in determining that he retained the residual

functional capacity to do sedentary work that involves lifting

and carrying five pounds frequently and ten pounds occasionally,

sitting six to eight hours per day, standing and walking six to
No. 01-21061

-2-

eight hours per day, sitting and standing at will, and

occasionally bending, stooping, and crawling. 

Nichols has not demonstrated any error in the Commissioner’s

decision. Substantial evidence supports the determination that

Nichols retained the residual functional capacity to do sedentary

work with the specified limitations. See Bowling v. Shalala, 36

F.3d 431, 434 (5th Cir. 1994); Johnson v. Bowen, 864 F.2d 340,

343 (5th Cir. 1988). Nichols’ argument that the Appeals Council

failed to give controlling weight to the opinions of the

physicians at University of Texas Medical Branch Hospitals is

unavailing because those opinions did not contradict the other

medical evidence; they simply added subjective complaints of

pain. Nichols’ argument that the ALJ misrepresented the evidence

of record is equally unavailing in that there was evidence in the

record to support the ALJ’s conclusion that he did not have a

listed impairment. See Leggett v. Chater, 67 F.3d 558, 563 & n.2

(5th Cir. 1995).

To the extent that Nichols argues that the ALJ did not

credit his subjective complaints of pain and other medical

evidence he asserts supports his claim of disability, he is

correct, but this court will neither reweigh the evidence nor

overturn the ALJ’s credibility determinations. See Chaparro v.

Bowen, 815 F.2d 1008, 1011 (5th Cir. 1987).

The magistrate judge’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
(51 Misc. 578)

#### FISCHER v. FROHNE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

November 14, 1906.)

Trial—Course of Trial—Right to Close.

Where plaintiff voluntarily withdrew the only claim disputed by defendant, who interposed a counterclaim, the refusal to permit defendant to close the argument to the jury was reversible error.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 46, Cent. Dig. Trial, § 58.]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan,. Seventh District.

*1017Action by Frederick William Fischer against William C. Frohne. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered.

Argued before GILDERSLEEVE, DUGRO, and DOWLING» JJ.

Robinson, Biddle & Ward (Norman B. Beecher, of counsel), for appellant.

.John P. Schuchman, for respondent.

GILDERSLEEVE, J.

The complaint herein set forth three causes of action against the defendant, two of which were wholly admitted by the answer. The third cause of action alleged an indebtedness on the part of defendant for six months’ rent. The answer admitted owing for five months, but denied that the defendant owed for the sixth month. When the parties met for trial, and after the jury was sworn, the plaintiff’s attorney waived the claim for rent for the sixth month, claiming only for five months, which the defendant had by his answer admitted. The defendant, having set up a counterclaim, then proceeded to sustain it, and put the defendant and other witnesses upon the stand in support thereof. The plaintiff’s attorney, at the close of the testimony on the part of the defendant, addressed the jury regarding his defense to the defendant’s counterclaim, and proceeded to introduce testimony contradictory to the defendant’s contention. At the close of the entire case the defendant claimed the right to close to the jury, which was refused him, and to which refusal he took an exception. The denial of the right, where the defendant has the affirmative of the issue, to close the case to the jury, has frequently been held to be error. Elwell v. Chamberlain, 31 N. Y. 611; Millerd v. Thorn, 56 N. Y. 402; Conselyea v. Swift, 103 N. Y. 604, 9 N. E. 489. The plaintiff, by voluntarily withdrawing his claim for the last month’s rent, the only item disputed by the defendant, in effect amended the complaint in that respect, and left nothing to be proven by the plaintiff to entitle him to a judgment, had there been no counterclaim interposed by the defendant.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2022 WY 108

 April Term, A.D. 2022

September 8, 2022

SHAWN PIERRE FRANCIS,

Appellant

(Defendant),

v.

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee

(Plaintiff).

S-22-0124

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE

[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that 

Appellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Pursuant to a 

plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional guilty plea to felony driving while 

under the influence, a fourth or subsequent offense in ten years. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 31-5-

233. The district court imposed a sentence of three and one-half to seven years. Appellant 

filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s March 9, 2022, Judgment and Sentence.

[¶2] On July 1, 2022, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel e-filed a Motion to 

Withdraw as Counsel, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 

1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently entered an Order Granting Motion 

for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Brief. This Court ordered that, on or before August 

22, 2022, Appellant was permitted to file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues 

he would like the Court to consider in this appeal. This Court also provided notice that, 

after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would make its ruling on counsel’s 

motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision on this appeal. Appellant 

did not file a pro se brief or other pleading in the time allotted.
[¶3] Now, following a careful review of the record and the Anders brief submitted by 

appellate counsel, this Court finds appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be 

granted and the district court’s Judgment and Sentence should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

[¶4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel 

for Appellant Shawn Pierre Francis, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record 

for Appellant; and it is further

[¶5] ORDERED that the Johnson County District Court’s March 9, 2022, Judgment and 

Sentence be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

[¶6] DATED this 8

th day of September, 2022.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

KATE M. FOX

Chief Justice
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Transparency Best Practices      

# Transparency Best Practices

The Privacy Technical Assistance Center offers this guidance, recommendations, and best practices on transparency for schools and districts, specifically related to keeping parents informed about the collection and use of student data. 

http://ptac.ed.gov/document/Transparency-Guidance?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Saving Matters Video      

# Saving Matters Video

Many workers don't realize how important it is to get an early start on saving for retirement. This Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration video provides information for workers about the importance of saving for retirement and how to get started. The video also has links to additional online tools to help workers take full advantage of their employer-sponsored benefits.

http://www.dol.gov/dol/media/webcast/20110916-ebsa/20110916-ebsa-retirement.htm
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NL
INDUSTRIES, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         355,320
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,857
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,669
<INVENTORY>                                    169,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               703,240
<PP&E>                                         798,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                 430,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,298,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          429,784
<BONDS>                                        338,868
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,355
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,298,881
<SALES>                                        464,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               477,543
<CGS>                                          324,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  324,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    96
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,180
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,447
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             39,714
<DISCONTINUED>                                 287,396
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,366)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   324,744
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.25
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. F. H. Henry Jones, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former County Court, Queens County, rendered June 14, 1961 after a jury trial, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, attempted grand larceny in the second degree and assault in the second degree, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. It is the defendant’s .sole contention on this appeal that the trial court committed prejudicial error in failing to charge the jury that it must exclude from consideration any statements which he may have made as the result of physical coercion. In our opinion, this contention is without merit. It is clear from the record that the statements referred to by the defendant were not confessions or even admissions (Fisch, New York Evidence, § 855, p. 421), since the statements indicated that he did not commit the crimes charged. Exculpatory statements, denying guilt, cannot be confessions *(People*v. *Kingston,*8 N Y 2d 384, 388). Under the circumstance's, the declarations made by the defendant denying any participation in the criminal acts charged were not confessions, and therefore do not come within the rule that confessions must be voluntary to be admissible *(People*v. *Reilly,*224 N. Y, 90; *Bruner*v. *People,*113 Col. 194; 3 Wigmore, Evidence [3d ed.], § 821). The purpose of the defendant’s statements was to show himself innocent, so that in point of fact he had not been induced, by the use of force, to relate what was untrue, to his prejudice. Hence, there was no basis for invoking the exclusionary rule. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Robert J. Dobbins, an Attorney, Respondent. Bar Association of Erie County, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

March 9, 1965.

*John B. Walsh*for petitioner. *Thomas*M. *O’Connor*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

'This attorney filed his resignation in this court as an attorney and counselor at law dated December 28, 1964 with the consent that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that an order be made consistent with his resignation.

During the month of November, 1964, the Bar Association of Erie County presented a petition in a disciplinary proceeding against him. The substance of these charges was that between the years of 1956 through 1964, he did not properly and expeditiously conduct his professional duties in matters entrusted to him by clients although he had been paid *fees;*that he had been retained to prepare and file income tax returns and had been given money by his clients to pay said taxes, which returns were never prepared or filed and no taxes paid; that during investigatory proceedings before the Grievance Committee of the Bar Association, he promised to make restitution to said clients which he failed to do; that some testimony which he gave before the Grievance Committee during the course of investigation was *520false and that he failed to co-operate generally with the Grievance Committee of the Bar *Association;*that he misappropriated funds from estates which were being handled by him as well as funds belonging to his clients; that he commingled with his personal funds, estate moneys and moneys rightfully belonging to clients.

He failed to file an answer denying the material allegations of the Bar Association’s petition. The matter was referred to a Justice of the Supreme Court to hear proof and to report to this court with respect to that proof. On the day set for the hearing of proof and after some proof had been heard, his resignation was received by this court.

We consider the resignation during the pendency of the disciplinary proceeding as well as the failure to controvert any of the allegations alleged in the petition as tantamount to an admission of the charges which were before us. In addition,.the proffered resignation makes it clear that it is an admission of the substance of the allegations contained in the petition.

The resignation will be accepted and an order e'ntered striking his name from the roll of attorneys and forbidding him from the practice óf law.

Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ:, concur.

Resignation accepted and order entered striking name from roll of attorneys and.forbidding the practice of law.
|EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Robert H. Young, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Robert H. Young   Robert H. Young
Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Central Vermont Public Service Corporation ("CVPS") and will be retained by CVPS and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------