alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

Report of Independent Auditors on Schedule

To
the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of VIASYS Healthcare Inc.

We
have audited the consolidated financial statements of VIASYS Healthcare Inc. as of January 3, 2004 and December 28, 2002, and for each of the three years in the
period ended January 3, 2004, and have issued our report thereon dated February 13, 2004 (included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 15(a) 2 of this Form 10-K. This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion based on our audits.

In
our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

| |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
| |  | ---------------------

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
February 13, 2004

---

QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 38 (Monday, March 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 12001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04073]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS21-02]

Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the meeting will be open to 
the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage 
(www.asc.gov) and access the provided registration link in the What's 
New box. You MUST register in advance to attend this Meeting.
    Date: March 10, 2021.
    Time: 10 a.m. ET.
    Status: Open.

Reports

Chairman
Executive Director
Grants Director
Financial Manager

Action and Discussion Items

Approval of Minutes
    September 9, 2020 Open Session
    October 5, 2020 Special Meeting
2020 ASC Annual Report
Approval of Cooperative Agreement for training and technical assistance

    How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting: Due to the COVID-19 
Pandemic, the meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. 
Visit the agency's homepage (www.asc.gov) and access the provided 
registration link in the What's New box. The meeting space is intended 
to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will not 
accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that 
reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, 
photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device 
designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC Meetings.

James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2021-04073 Filed 2-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6556

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL BAILEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph Robert Goodwin,

District Judge. (CR-00-113, CA-02-1441)

Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 30, 2003

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Bailey seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

This order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct.

1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S.

941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Bailey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Altra Industrial Motion, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael L. Hurt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Corporation.       Date: May 22, 2006               By: /s/ Michael L. Hurt           Name: Michael L. Hurt    Title: Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directorsand Stockholders 

Harvard Bioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Numbers 333-53848, 333-104544 and 333-135418 on Form S-8 of HarvardBioscience, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and our report dated March 15, 2007 with respect to management’s assessmentof the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annualreport on Form 10-K of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. 

Our reports include an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of Statementof Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), *Share Based Payment*, effective January 1, 2006, the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined BenefitPension and Other Postretirement Plans-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)*, effective December 31, 2006 and the change in the Company’s method of quantifying errors in 2006. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 15, 2007
FIRST
      VALLEY BANCORP, INC. FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT


MARCH
      31,
      2007














CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First Valley Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
      L. Messier, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.











/s/
                Robert L. Messier, Jr.Robert
                L. Messier, Jr.President
                and CEO








The
      foregoing is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      is
      not being filed as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 42 (Friday, March 5, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04398]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 1

[WT Docket No. 19-250; RM-11849; Report No. 3168; FRS 17410]


Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Proceedings

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petition for Reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Petition for Reconsideration (Petition) has been filed in the 
Commission's proceeding by Gerard Lavery Lederer and Nancy L. Werner, 
on behalf of Local Governments and National Association of 
Telecommunications Officers and Advisors (``NATOA'').

DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must be filed on or before March 22, 
2021. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before March 30, 
2021.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Georgios Leris, Competition and 
Infrastructure Policy Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 
(202) 418-1994.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
document, Report No. 3168, released January 14, 2021. The full text of 
the Petition can be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic 
Comment Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission 
will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress 
or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being adopted by the Commission.
    Subject: Implementation of State and Local Governments' Obligation 
to Approve Certain Wireless Facility Modification Requests Under 
Section 6409(a) of the Spectrum Act of 2012, published 85 FR 78005, 
December 3, 2020, in WT Docket No. 19-250 and RM-11849. This document 
is being published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR 
1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-04398 Filed 3-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### John Bizzaro et al., Plaintiffs, v Nicholas J. Meleo et al., Defendants, Rockwell Manufacturing Co., Respondent, and Dollinger Corporation, Appellant. (And 16 Other Actions.)

(Appeal No. 14.)

— Judgment unanimously reversed and motion denied. (See *Meleo v Rochester Gas & Elec. Corp.,*72 AD2d 83.) (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court *836—dismiss complaints and cross claims.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Doerr, JJ.
#### § 1207.365 Personal liability.

No member of the Board shall be held personally responsible, either individually or jointly with others, in any way whatsoever to any person for errors in judgments, mistakes, or other acts, either of commission or omission, as such member except for acts of willful misconduct, gross negligence, or those which are criminal in nature.
#### § 1215.19 State.

*State* means each of the 50 States and the District of Columbia.
@. 

Hilton 

Minneapolis/Bloomington 

Jim Waldvogel, CHA 

General Manager 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

United States Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

(/"1 

On behalf ofthe Hilton Minneapolis/Bloomington hotel and an active board membefof 

the Bloomington Sister City Organization, I am writing to express our strong support for 

the application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Seattle, Detroit, Los 

Angeles, Honolulu and Haneda, Tokyo International Airport. 

The citypfBloomington has strong ties to Japan as our sister city is Izumi, and our 

Qrganization:spurpose is to promote international understanding through the exchange of 

peopl~, information, and ideas. 

Approval ofDelta's new services would be a major benefit for our organization and 

region, where many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. 

There are many Japanese companies located in Washington, Michigan, Los Angeles and 

Hawaii and hundreds more whose business models rely on access to Japan and its market. 

The growth ofour business ties with Japan has created demand for increased capacity to 

Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown 

Haneda airport. 

Detroit, Los A..'1geles, Seattle and Honolulu are proven and successful gateways to Asia, 

and as airports that can support trans-pacific routes. The addition ofHaneda as a 

destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our travelers. Thank you for 

consideration ofthis request. 

Sincerely, 

d'··Jv-.~.J Jim Waldvogel 


General Manager 


Hilton Minneapolis/Bloomington 

3900 American Boulevard West 

Bloom;ington,M~55437, " . 

. O{fice9528939500 

Fax 952 830' 5259
§ 1207.341 Budget and expenses. ( a ) At the beginning of each fiscal period, or as may be necessary thereafter, the Board shall prepare and recommend a budget on a fiscal period basis of its anticipated expenses and disbursements in the administration of this plan, including probable costs of research, development, advertising, and promotion. The Board shall also recommend a rate of assessment calculated to provide adequate funds to defray its proposed expenditures and to provide for a reserve as set forth in § 1207.344.
( b ) The Board is authorized to incur such expenses for research, development, advertising, or promotion of potatoes and potato products, such other expenses for the administration, maintenance, and functioning of the Board, and any referendum and administrative costs incurred by the Department of Agriculture as are approved pursuant to § 1207.361.
[37 FR 5008, Mar. 9, 1972, as amended at 49 FR 20806, May 17, 1984]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Highlights of the 2010 National Youth Gang Survey      

# Highlights of the 2010 National Youth Gang Survey

The Department of Justice’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention has released “Highlights of the 2010 National Youth Gang Survey,” a fact sheet that discusses the prevalence of gangs and gang activity in the United States, as well as reasons for gang-member migration and external gang influences. 

http://www.ojjdp.gov/pubs/237542.pdf
#### § 1217.16 Nominal size.

*Nominal size* means the size by which softwood lumber is known and sold in the marketplace that differs from actual size and is based on the thickness and width of a board when it is first cut from a log, or rough cut, prior to drying and planing.
#### In re WESTCHESTER TRUST CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Corporations—Election of Directors.

The filing of a resolution of a corporation reducing the number of directors, which filing is required by Stock Corporation Daw, Daws 1892, p. 1829, c. 688, § 21, relates back to the meeting at which such resolution was passed, and hence, where the number of directors was reduced, an election the next day in accordance therewith was regular, although the resolution reducing the number was not filed until later.

Appeal from Special Term, Westchester County.

Application to review an election of directors of the Westchester Trust Company. From an order denying the application, petitoner appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before HIRSCHBERG, P. J., and HOOKER, GAYNOR, RICH, and MILLER, JJ.

Gerard B. Townsend, for appellant.

Ralph Earl Prime, Jr., for respondent.

GAYNOR, J.

The established number of directors of the corporation was 25, but the number in office had fallen to 21 by resignations. At the annual meeting of the stockholders in 1906 they voted, pursuant to notice, and previous consent thereto of the superintendent of banks, to reduce the number to 20, and to elect only 7 at the annual election on that day, viz., 5 for three years and 2 for two years. At the election 6 were voted for for the three years term, of whom the petitioner was one. His vote being the smallest, the inspectors reported the other five elected, and that result was declared.

*250The petitioner’s claim is that although the stockholders had on that same day before the election duly reduced the number of directors, their resolution had not yet gone into effect at the election, for lack of a transcript of the proceedings of their meeting having been filed, as required by section *21*of the stock corporation law (Laws 1892, p. 1829, c. 688), in the office where the original certificate of incorporation of the company was filed. On that basis he would be elected, for except for the reduction more than 5 directors were due to be elected in the three years class.

The transcript was filed in ten days and before this proceeding was begun. The act of reduction had therefore taken effect. It is true that the act of reduction is not complete and does not take effect until such filing (Matter of Dolgeville Elec. L. & P. Co., 160 N. Y. 500, 55 N. E. 287); but the filing relates back to the meeting of the stockholders and makes the act or resolution of reduction effective. The case cited above is not contrary to this. There the transcript was never filed, and therefore the directors who had been dropped by the reduction were still in office, from which it followed, as the court held, that the petition for a voluntary dissolution was not signed by a majority of the directors, and failed to confer jurisdiction on the Supreme Court. In this case the resolution of reduction was operative when this proceeding was begun.

The order should be affirmed.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Statement
      of Chief Executive Officer Furnished**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, Richard B. Collins, is the President and Chief Executive Officer
      of
      United Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”).





This
      statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
      the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
      (the “Report”).





By
      execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
      knowledge:





A)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
                and





B)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
                Report.





This
      statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
      this
      statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement
      be
      deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to United Financial Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by United
      Financial Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.











May
                5, 2006
            
            /s/
                Richard B. CollinsDated
            
            Richard
                B. CollinsPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer




20
EX-10.8



 Exhibit 10.8 

SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 

The following sets forth the compensation payable to Alere Inc.’s non-employee directors as of
December 31, 2016: 
 1. Base Cash Compensation 
  

	 	•	 	Each non-employee director will receive Base Cash Compensation of $80,000 annually. Payments are made quarterly in arrears. 


2. Additional Cash Compensation 
  

	 	•	 	Each non-employee director will also receive the following annual Additional Cash Compensation based upon his or her service on committees of the Board: 


 

					
	Chair (annual Additional Committee Cash Compensation)	 
	-Audit	  	$	25,000	 
	-Compensation	  	$	20,000	 
	-Nominating/Governance	  	$	20,000	 
	
	Member (annual Additional Committee Cash Compensation)	 
	-Audit	  	$	15,000	 
	-Compensation	  	$	10,000	 
	-Nominating/Governance	  	$	10,000	 

 3. Equity Award 
  

	 	•	 	Each director will receive a restricted stock unit (RSU) award that vests one year from the date of grant. The fair value of the RSU award, on the date of grant, is $200,000.