alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Madison Explorations,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kevin M. Stunder, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2006



                                        By: /s/ KEVIN M. STUNDER
                                            _____________________________
                                                Kevin M. Stunder
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                and Director
#### § 1005.72 Payments from the producer-settlement fund.

No later than one day after the date of payment receipt required under § 1005.71, the market administrator shall pay to each handler the amount, if any, by which the amount computed pursuant to § 1005.71(b) exceeds the amount computed pursuant to § 1005.71(a). If, at such time, the balance in the producer-settlement fund is insufficient to make all payments pursuant to this section, the market administrator shall reduce uniformly such payments and shall complete the payments as soon as the funds are available.
Order entered April 18, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00338
- CR
KENNETH TYRELL WINSL OW, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Cou nty Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 001
- 85568
- 2017



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s April 17, 2018 motion to withdraw his appeal. Although the motion is signed by counsel, it is not signed by appellant as required by T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2

. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2 (“ appellant and his or her attorney must sign the motion.”).
We DENY the motion without prejudice to filing a motion that complies with the rules of appellate procedure.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTIC E
§ 1006.85 Assessment for order administration. On or before the payment receipt date specified under § 1006.71, each handler shall pay to the market administrator its *pro rata* share of the expense of administration of the order at a rate specified by the market administrator that is no more than $.08 per hundredweight with respect to: ( a ) Receipts of producer milk (including the handler's own production) other than such receipts by a handler described in § 1000.9(c) of this chapter that were delivered to pool plants of other handlers;
( b ) Receipts from a handler described in § 1000.9(c) of this chapter;
( c ) Receipts of concentrated fluid milk products from unregulated supply plants and receipts of nonfluid milk products assigned to Class I use pursuant to § 1000.43(d) of this chapter and other source milk allocated to Class I pursuant to § 1000.44(a)(3) and (8) chapter and the corresponding steps of § 1000.44(b) of this chapter, except other source milk that is excluded from the computations pursuant to § 1006.60(d) and (e); and
( d ) Route disposition in the marketing area from a partially regulated distributing plant that exceeds the skim milk and butterfat subtracted pursuant to § 1000.76(a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this chapter.
[79 FR 25002, May 2, 2014; 79 FR 26591, May 9, 2014]
#### § 1200.100 General.

The terms defined/specified in this subpart shall apply to all research and promotion programs authorized under the Act.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Geneva  Gold  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending February 28, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Marcus Johnson, Chief Executive Officer/President of the Company and I, D. Bruce
Horton, Chief Financial  Officer/Treasurer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: April 18, 2007                By: /s/ MARCUS JOHNSON
                                        _________________________________
                                            Marcus Johnson
                                            Chief Executive Officer/President


Date: April 18, 2007                By: /s/ D. BRUCE HORTON
                                        _________________________________
                                            D. Bruce Horton
                                            Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer
§ 1.659 What are the requirements for post-hearing briefs? ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) Each party may file a post-hearing brief within 15 days after the close of the hearing.
( 2 ) A party may file a reply brief only if requested by the ALJ. The deadline for filing a reply brief, if any, will be set by the ALJ.
( 3 ) The ALJ may limit the length of the briefs to be filed under this section.
( b ) *Content.* ( 1 ) An initial brief must include: ( i ) A concise statement of the case;
( ii ) A separate section containing proposed findings regarding the issues of material fact, with supporting citations to the hearing record;
( iii ) Arguments in support of the party's position; and
( iv ) Any other matter required by the ALJ.
( 2 ) A reply brief, if requested by the ALJ, must be limited to any issues identified by the ALJ.
( c ) *Form.* ( 1 ) An exhibit admitted in evidence or marked for identification in the record may not be reproduced in the brief. ( i ) Such an exhibit may be reproduced, within reasonable limits, in an appendix to the brief.
( ii ) Any pertinent analysis of an exhibit may be included in a brief.
( 2 ) If a brief exceeds 20 pages, it must contain: ( i ) A table of contents and of points made, with page references; and
( ii ) An alphabetical list of citations to legal authority, with page references.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Preventing Marijuana Use Among Youth & Young Adults      

# Preventing Marijuana Use Among Youth & Young Adults

This publication (PDF, 8 pages) provides an overview of marijuana use among young people and describes the physical, academic, and social consequences of marijuana use. The resource offers tips for how to help prevent marijuana use among young people and shares relevant federal resources.**Learn more** (PDF, 8 pages).
#### § 1033.42 Classification of transfers and diversions.

See § 1000.42.
#### § 1219.18 Part and subpart.

*Part* means the Order and all rules, regulations, and supplemental orders issued pursuant to the Act and the Order. The Order itself shall be a *subpart* of such part.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Irineo ESPINO-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40666

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Irineo Espino-Reyes raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *441
      *petition for cert. filed*(Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Siouxland Ethanol, LLC, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs
auditors and the audit committee of Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in Siouxland Ethanol, LLCs internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2008
    /s/ Charles HoflandCharles Hofland, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive
Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 40 (Wednesday, March 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 12487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel; Fellowship Review.
    Date: March 9, 2021.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Eliane Lazar-Wesley, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 8339, MSC 9670, Bethesda, 
MD 20892-8401, (301) 496-8683, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3550590347755b5c5d1b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66030a501426080f0e48010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 26, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-04363 Filed 3-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 1007.54 Equivalent price.

See § 1000.54.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 12.1--Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges--in thousands

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Nine months    Year
                                     ended       ended      Period              Year ended December 31,
                                  December 31, March 31, January 1 to  -----------------------------------------
                                      2001       2001    April 4, 2000     1999          1998          1997
                                  ------------ --------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
                                                         (Predecessor) (Predecessor) (Predecessor) (Predecessor)
<S>                               <C>          <C>       <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Income (loss) from operations....   (370,343)   (19,439)     2,133        (765,197)     (32,663)       33,690
Distribution from joint ventures.        125      3,600         --           4,000           --            --
                                   ---------   --------     ------       ---------     --------       -------
                                    (370,218)   (15,839)     2,133        (761,197)     (32,663)       33,690
Interest expense.................     36,855     54,677         --              --           --            --
Interest allocated to assets held
  for sale.......................         --      1,256         --              --           --            --
Interest portion of rent expense.      3,861      6,510      1,495           4,005        3,070         3,454
                                   ---------   --------     ------       ---------     --------       -------
Total Fixed Charges..............     40,716     62,443      1,495           4,005        3,070         3,454
                                   ---------   --------     ------       ---------     --------       -------
Earnings before income
  taxes & fixed charges..........  $(329,502)  $ 46,604     $3,628       $(757,192)    $(29,593)      $37,144
                                   =========   ========     ======       =========     ========       =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges........................         (a)        (a)       2.4              (a)          (a)         10.8
                                   =========   ========     ======       =========     ========       =======
</TABLE>
--------
(a) For the nine months ended December 31, 2001, fiscal year ended March 31,
    2001 and the years ended December 31, 1999 (Predecessor) and 1998
    (Predecessor) earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by
    $370,218, $15,839, $761,197 and $32,663.
#### § 1205.337 Influencing governmental action.

No funds collected by the Board under this subpart shall in any manner be used for the purpose of influencing governmental policy or action except in recommending to the Secretary amendments to this subpart.

[31 FR 16758, Dec. 31, 1966. Redesignated at 56 FR 64472, Dec. 10, 1991]
|Exhibit 13.1
|------------

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CIBT Education Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Toby Chu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 
|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| 



|By:/s/ Toby ChuToby ChuChief Executive OfficerJanuary 7, 2008
|-------------------------------------------------------------

---
#### *White's Executors vs. Guthrie and others.*

Chancery

Case 138.

Error to the Franklin Circuit; Hekry Davidge, Judge.

*Injunction. Damages. Practice. Credit. Dollars.*

June 15.

When an injunction is PerPetuated is credited a.# law, itiserror to give

gesupondis-' solution of injunction,without as-pertaining the oiacaliy.

A payment ^-eciated paper. Credit given for doi-e*®r" deduction *t&*deprectatioa-

Denny, for plaintiff; *Crittenden,*for defendants.

Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.-

We have detected no error in the calcalation of credits by the circuit court. We would not feel authorised to reverse the decree for not perpetuting the entire injunction, or tor not perpetuating a larger sum. But as the injunction was perpetuated for more than had been credited on the.execution, the court ought not to have decreed costs against the complainants below.

Nor was it proper to decree 10 per cent damages in gross, without ascertaining and decreeing the amount of those damages.

The decree itself, should shew the precise amount, It should not be left to the clerk to make the calculation. Such irregularities in the practice of some of the circuit courts should be corrected.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded for a decree to be entered conformable to this opinion.

Each party must pay their own costs in this court.,

Upon a re-consideration, we areinclined to think, that as the creditor when he received commonwealth’s paper, gave a receipt for the nominal amount for dollars, and as the case is a hard one against the plaintiffs, the payments ought to be considered as so much specie in discharge of an equal amount of the debt.

But as it is admitted that no part of Smith’s interest has been paid, none of that should be enjoined.

Wherefore, the former opinion must be modified and the cause remanded for a perpetuation of the injunction for all except Smith’s interest.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of YaSheng Group (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:   September 6, 2012By: /s/Zhou Chang ShengZhou Chang ShengChief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

278.2 

CA 10-00872 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

EMMA HARTSOCK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TEMPORARY 

GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND PROPERTY OF ROY A. 

HARTSOCK, PLAINTIFF, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBERT T. SCACCIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, 

NASH-CAR SALES & SERVICE, E. DAVID NASHWINTER, 

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, 

JULIE’S SEABREEZE RESTAURANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

LAW OFFICES OF TAYLOR & SANTACROSE, BUFFALO (DESTIN C. SANTACROSE OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

DIXON & HAMILTON, LLP, GETZVILLE (MICHAEL B. DIXON OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph

A. Boniello, III, J.), entered February 8, 2010. The order granted

the motion of defendants Nash-Car Sales & Service and E. David

Nashwinter for summary judgment dismissing defendant Robert T.

Scaccia’s cross claim against them. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Hartsock v Scaccia ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d

___ [May 6, 2011]).

Entered: May 6, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court