alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Schaeffer, John

From: Schaeffer, John Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 9:12 AM To: Schaeffer, John Subject: FW: 52556-42-0 COPS-1 Robust Summaries

John Schaeffer Senior Biologist USEPA/OPPT/CCD/CITB 1201 Constitution Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460 Mail Code: 7405M Phone: 202-564-8173

From: Boethling, Bob

Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 4:38 PM

To: Schaeffer, John Subject: RE: 52556-42-0 COPS-1 Robust Summaries

Here’s the answer I sent—it noted your humor but ap parently I was so mesmerized by it, I forgot to act ually do the work. The biodegradation study is straightforward and was correctly performed, with the somewhat surp rising (for me) result that the test substance was not readily biod egradable. From the degradation curves in the repo rt you can see that right at the endo of the study period degradat ion seemed to be starting. This means that if the study had been extended 2 weeks, it’s likely they would have obser ved much higher % degradation. Formally the substa nce is “NRB” (not readily biodegradable) because is based on the 28-days result. I note the upward tick in their c urves only 1) For the case that the possibil ity/likelihood of degradation eventually occurring is useful knowledge for whatever EPA plans to do with the test data (you know better than I); and 2) To make a general point that although it’s not wid ely known except to “insiders”, OECD guidance does permit extending ready biodeg tests for just such cases (i.e. labs c ould do this more often).

Robert Boethling, PhD Exposure Assessment Branch US EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW (7406M) Washington, DC 20460 202-564-8533 (P) 202-564-8892 (F) [EPI Suite] http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuite. htm

[FatePointer] http://esc.syrres.com/fatepointer/sea rch.asp
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

The undersigned,the Chief Financial Officer of TransMontaigne GP L.L.C., a Delawarelimited liability company and general partner of TransMontaigne Partners L.P.(the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)           the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,2005, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)          the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|        | /s/ RANDALL J. LARSON                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Randall J. Larson                                       |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting  Officer* |
|   | November 9, 2005                                   |

 

 

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1227 

To modify the age requirement for the Student Incentive Payment Program 

of the State maritime academies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2023 

Mr. BERGMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To modify the age requirement for the Student Incentive 

Payment Program of the State maritime academies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Changing Age-Deter5 mined Eligibility To Student Incentive Payments Act’’ or 

6 the ‘‘CADETS Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1227 IH

1 SEC. 2. AGE REQUIREMENT FOR THE STUDENT INCENTIVE 

2 PAYMENT PROGRAM OF THE STATE MARI3 TIME ACADEMIES. 

4 Section 51509 of title 46, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(i) AGE REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary may make 

7 an agreement under this section only with a qualified stu8 dent who will meet the age requirement for enlistment in 

9 the Navy Reserve at the time of graduation from the acad10 emy.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           College Senior Credits Supportive Relationships as Essential to Bullying Prevention      

# College Senior Credits Supportive Relationships as Essential to Bullying Prevention

Whitney Dockrey, a 22-year-old senior at Georgetown University, participated as a youth panelist in a bullying prevention workshop convened in April 2014 by the Institute of Medicine. This blog post features her perspective on the importance of building and maintaining supportive relationships as a way to prevent and respond to bullying.

http://www.stopbullying.gov/blog/2014/11/24/college-senior-credits-supportive-relationships?utm_source=Find%20Youth%20Info&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Events-Recent
iK************* * -COMM . JOURNAL - xoK**************** * DAT E SEP-26-200 5 *>*** * TIM E 16=1 7 ** * P.0 1 START=SEP-2 6 15=5 9 END=SEP-2 6 16=1 6 MOD E = MEMOR Y TRANSMISSIO N FIL E N0. = 00 9 • ST NNO . CO M ABB R NO . STATIO NNAME/TEL.NO . PAGE S DURATIO N 00 1 BUS Y E 91501982630 3 000/00 2 00=00'0 0
>i<********X<***X< >l<** *X<*>f<***>k***X<** * >(<*** *- ******** *



## SUPERFUN D BRANCH OFFIC EO FREGIONALCOUNSEL U.S . EP A REGIO N 6 144 5 Ros s Avenue , Ste . 120 0 Dallas , Texa s 75202-273 3 

# F^"''^ . Telephon e No . (214 ) 665-2134 , 213 5 Telefax No . (214 ) 665-646 0 % U J a 

# Strr/ 

# KZ x FACSIMIL ETRANSMISSIO N FROM : TO : SUBJ : COMMENTS : X^ryy^ ^ Z^^n^X L yX^*P ^ yi<.tX7C2i^2'^J~ . xt^ZLi—

S// F9S'2 - Oyr 3

TOTALNO . PAGES : T - SEN T BY : 

### IZ-t--^-*^- - 

# p — DATE/TIM E ?/26/^ ^ 17/Pj , 

## X ^ 905035 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME, AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      6903335
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     318432
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          834236
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       4853769
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  138334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13048106
<COMMON>                                        187365
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      2341352
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             663981
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 3192698
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            74810
<PREFERRED>                                     440000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           6684377
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    67065
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                         7620
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 2581536
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                 13048106
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      2009310
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           (54337)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     2055837
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     2055837
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        (46527)
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                2596
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 (43931)
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        131451
<NET-INCOME>                                  (121045)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      18394
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                 (139439)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       (3500162)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 125 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 125

 To prohibit the imposition of mask mandates on public transportation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Homeland Security, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the imposition of mask mandates on public transportation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Travel Mask Mandate Repeal Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN MASK MANDATES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal agency shall impose any Federal requirement related to COVID-19 
that an individual wear a face mask when utilizing any conveyance (as 
defined in section 70.1 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, or 
any successor regulation) or transportation hub.
    (b) Limitation on Existing Orders.--Effective on the date of 
enactment of this Act, the order issued on January 29, 2021, by the 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under section 361 of the 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264) establishing a requirement 
for persons to wear masks while on conveyances and at transportation 
hubs, as well as any other related order, directive, and emergency 
amendment of the Transportation Security Administration (including 
those described in EA 1546-21-01A, SD 1542-21-01A, SD 1544-21-02A, SD 
1582-84-21-01A, EA 1546-21-01, SD 1542-21-01, SD 1544-21-02, and SD 
1582/84-21-01) shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of William T. Ashton on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Respondent, v. Board of Education of School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Milton, Malta, Ballston Spa and Charlton, Appellant, and Board of Education of Enlarged City School District of Saratoga Springs, Respondent.

Memorandum by the Court. Judgment affirmed, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Sweeney at Special Term (44 Misc 2d 780), with costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.
#### 970.2672-2 Requirements.

The requirements set forth in subpart 926.71, Implementation of Section 3161 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, for contractors and subcontractors to provide a hiring preference for employees under Department of Energy contracts whose employment in positions at a Department of Energy Defense Nuclear Facility is terminated (except for a termination for cause) applies to management and operating contracts.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 68221, Nov. 5, 2010]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

 Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

December 14, 2016

Order 

Clerk

December 14, 2016

154808(93)

SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN SURGICAL

HOSPITAL, LLC, d/b/a SOUTHEAST

MICHIGAN SURGICAL HOSPITAL,

and JAMIE LETKEMANN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

SC: 154808

v COA: 323425

Wayne CC: 11-015300-NF

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Association for Justice 

to participate as amicus curiae and to file a brief in support of the application for leave to 

appeal is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on December 7, 2016, is accepted for 

filing.
#### *Blanton vs.*Rice.

Chancery.

Case 55

Error to the Garrard Circuit; John L. Bridges, Juagó.

June 26.

*Application of payments.*

Controversy of the parties' concerning the applicáa pajr'

Rule given tfou'of 0" payments made genernot ai,_ plied by the parties,

judge Mills

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The only question in this case, arising betwen the complainant and defendant in chancery, is the appropriation of a credit, for a payment made by thejeompíainant, to the defendants, who held demands on him, due by different securities or undertakings. The complainant had undertaken to pay the defendants the amount of certain claims due to them by a third person. One of those claims was due by a replevin bond, in which the complainant was surety, and the others by a simple undertaking, not yet settled by judgments The payment in contest was made, and a receipt given therefor, without specifying to whichs The complainant contends that it is to go in discharge of the replevin bond first; the defendants, to the other claim.

The payor may direct to which demand, a payinent shall be applied. If he does not do it, the payee may apply it. If both fail the law will apply it, by indulging presumptions between the parties, and generally in a court of equity, a payment will be applied toa demand bearing interest, where there is another not bearing interest, between the same parties. Here it is not certainly shown whether the demand contended for by the defendants, does, or *254does hot, bear interest, although it most prebahij does. But it is evident that the demand which the complainant insists upon to be first extinguished, is best secured, and in such a case it is deemed equitable, to apply the credit to the debt, the security of which is most precarious-~-according to the case of Field &c. vs. Holland, 6 Cranch, 8. To this demand the court below,, applied this credit, and there is, therefore, no error in the decree, and it must be. affirmed with costs and damages.

*Robertson,*for plaintiff..
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warner Music Group Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: August 7, 2008
Exhibit 4.1

 

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

A123 SYSTEMS, INC.

 

Pursuant to Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), it is hereby certified that:

 

1.             The name of the corporation is A123 Systems, Inc. (the “Corporation”).

 

2.             The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by deleting Article One and inserting in lieu thereof a new Article One to read as follows:

 

“ARTICLE ONE

NAME

 

The name of this corporation is B456 Systems, Inc. (hereinafter, the “Corporation”).”

 

3.             The foregoing amendment was directed by an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware and was adopted in accordance with Section 303 of the General Corporation Law.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation to be duly executed as of this 22nd day of March, 2013.

 

 

	
 
    	
A123   SYSTEMS, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   David J. Prystash
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
David   J. Prystash
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief   Financial Officer
#### Muriel J. Tate, Respondent, v Stephen L. Tate, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 23, 1979, and judgment entered thereon on April 30, 1979, unanimously affirmed without opinion. Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 6, 1979, insofar as it awarded plaintiff a counsel fee in the sum of $1,000 and denied plaintiff’s application for an order requiring defendant to post a surety bond "without prejudice to a renewal in the event that defendant does not diligently prosecute his appeal,” unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to strike the provision for a counsel fee and the provision relating to diligent prosecution of defendant’s appeal. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The circumstances disclosed in the present record do not justify the award of an additional counsel fee. Nor was it appropriate for Special Term to condition the denial of the primary relief sought by plaintiff upon defendant’s diligent prosecution of an appeal. Such is the prerogative of the Appellate Division. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Trauma-informed Care and Outcomes Among Youth      

# Trauma-informed Care and Outcomes Among Youth

This report released by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration illustrates that children and youth participating in community-based programs, who are involved in the juvenile justice and child welfare systems, demonstrate improved outcomes after receiving trauma-informed services.

http://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/press-announcements/201205140115