alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Ticket to Work Program      

# Ticket to Work Program

The Ticket to Work Program provides most people receiving Social Security benefits (beneficiaries) more choices for receiving employment services.  Under this program, the Social Security Administration (SSA) issues tickets to eligible beneficiaries who, in turn, may choose to assign those tickets to an Employment Network (EN) of their choice to obtain employment services, vocational rehabilitation services, or other support services necessary to achieve a vocational (work) goal.  The EN, if they accept the ticket, will coordinate and provide appropriate services to help the beneficiary find and maintain employment. Learn more about Ticket to Work

http://www.choosework.net/resource/jsp/searchByState.jsp
CORRECTED: June 9, 2009 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3132 MARIE C. MAPLES,Petitioner,
v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in

AT844E080694-I-1. ON MOTION Before NEWMAN 

### Circuit Judge. ORDER Marie C. Maples moves to supplement the record to include various documents not before the Merit Systems Protection Board. Maples also moves for an extension of time, until June 29, 2009, to pay the court's docketing fee. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion to supplement the record is deferred for consideration by the merits panel that is assigned to hear the case.

A copy of this order and the motions papers regarding the motion to supplement the record shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear this
case.(3) The motion for an extension of time to pay the docketing fee is granted.

No further extensions should be anticipated.

JUN - 9 2009 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbalv Jan Horbaly Clerk Date

cc: Marie C. Maples David M. Hibey, Esq. s19 JUN u9 2009 JAN HOR8ALY CLERK

2009-3132 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Benjamin Brighenti and James Eustace, Appellants.

Appeals by defendants from judgments of the former County Court, Kings County, rendered July 10, 1962 on their pleas of guilty, convicting each of them of robbery in the first degree, unarmed, and imposing sentence. Defendants contend that the defendant Brighenti’s motion to suppress evidence should have been granted. A similar motion by the defendant Eustace was withdrawn, but he urges that, if the judgment as to defendant Brighenti be reversed, then the judgment as to him should also be reversed. Judgments affirmed as to both defendants. We have examined defendants’ contentions, and we have found no substantial error in the conduct of the hearing on the motion to suppress evidence. More particularly, it is our opinion that, on this record, the defendant Brighenti’s absence from the hearing in no way prejudiced his rights. Even if it be assumed that he was entitled to be present at the hearing, his attorney’s failure to arrange to have him produced at the hearing constituted an effective waiver of the defendant’s right to be present and an unequivocal election to proceed through the attorney alone, without the defendant. In this connection, it should be noted, that during the course of the hearing, when alerted by the court to his client’s absence, the attorney remarked that his client could not “add very much ” by being present. For these reasons and for the added reasons set forth in *People*v. *Colombani*(22 A D 2d 956), we hold that the defendant Brighenti’s right to be present, if any, was waived. We take this occasion to point out that we have not decided or reached the question of whether a defendant, as matter of law, has the right to be present or whether his presence is indispensable at a hearing upon his motion to suppress evidence which he is prosecuting through an attorney. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### § 1000.90 Dates.

If a date required for a payment contained in a Federal milk order falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or national holiday, such payment will be due on the next day that the market administrator's office is open for public business.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Lugo, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 20, 1977, convicting him of criminal sale of a dangerous drug in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, guilty plea vacated, and matter remitted to Criminal Term for a hearing in accordance herewith. Defendant was charged with criminal sale of a dangerous drug in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the sixth degree, arising out of the sale of drugs to an undercover police officer. He moved to dismiss the indictment upon the ground that a 30-month delay between the dates of the drug transactions and the date of the indictment deprived him of due process of law. Upon the return date of the motion, the court ruled that defendant had the initial burden of coming forward with proof to establish that he had been prejudiced by the delay. The defendant contended that initially the People had the burden of proving good cause for the delay and he refused to adduce any evidence until the People met that burden. The People, on the other hand, contended that the 30-month delay was occasioned by the fact that the police had been unable to find the defendant during that time, and offered to produce witnesses to this effect if required to do so by the court. At one point the court stated that it would hear testimony offered by either party, but after considerable confusion, the proceedings closed without any witnesses being called. Thereafter the motion to dismiss was denied upon the ground that defendant had failed to sustain his burden of proof on the issue of prejudice. This was error. Where there.has been protracted delay involving the passage of several years between the commission of the offense and the indictment, the burden is on the prosecution to establish good cause *(People v Prosser,*309 NY 353, 358; *People v Singer,*44 NY2d 241, 254). Under the circumstances of this case the failure of the People to adduce evidence on the issue of good cause for the preindictment delay should not be conclusive, and the People should be afforded the opportunity to present additional evidence *(People v Singer, supra,*p 255). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to Criminal Term for a new hearing. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### William L. Rivera et al., Respondents, v Alexander Francis, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 840]

*691In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hubsher, J.), dated September 16, 2003, and (2) an order of the same court dated October 7, 2003, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff William Liburd Rivera did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated September 16, 2003, is dismissed as abandoned *(see*22 NYCRR 670.8 [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated October 7, 2003, is reversed, on the law, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.

The defendant made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff William Liburd Rivera (hereinafter the plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car*Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). The affirmation of the plaintiffs physician was based upon an examination made some six years after the last medical treatment rendered to the plaintiff, and neither the physician nor the plaintiff proffered a satisfactory explanation for this significant gap in treatment *(see Jimenez v Kambli,*272 AD2d 581, 582 [2000]; *Smith v Askew,*264 AD2d 834 [1999]).

Moreover, the plaintiff failed to submit any competent medical evidence supporting his claim that he was unable to perform substantially all of his daily activities for not less than 90 of the first 180 days following the subject accident as a result of that accident *(see Sainte-Aime v Ho,*274 AD2d 569, 570 [2000]; *Jackson v New York City Tr. Auth.,*273 AD2d 200, 201 [2000]; *Greene v Miranda,*272 AD2d 441, 442 [2000]; *Arshad v Gomer,*268 AD2d 450 [2000]; *Bennett v Reed,*263 AD2d 800 [1999]; *DiNunzio v County of Suffolk,*256 AD2d 498, 499 [1998]).

Accordingly, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted. Santucci, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION 

I, Lloyd T. Rochford, certify that: 

1.              I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Arena Resources, Inc. 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement          of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the          statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were          made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as          of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4.              The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for          establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in          Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a)              designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure          controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated          subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly          during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

b)              evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the          period covered by this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

c)              disclosed in this report any change of the registrant’s internal control          over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent          fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual          reporter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the          registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5.              The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on          our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the          registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of          directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)              all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation          of internal control and financial reporting which are reasonably likely to          adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and 

b)              any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over          financial reporting. 

/s/ Lloyd T. Rochford
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Midway Gold Corp. (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





November 5, 2010                                                                /s/ Daniel Wolfus Daniel Wolfus
  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
  (Principal Executive Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
PUBLIC LAW 109–174—FEB. 18, 2006 120 STAT. 189

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4745:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Feb. 15, considered and passed House.

Feb. 17, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–174

109th Congress

An Act

Making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for the Small Business

Administration’s disaster loans program, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the

following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury

not otherwise appropriated, for fiscal year 2006:

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

DISASTER LOANS PROGRAM ACCOUNT

(INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS)

For an additional amount for ‘‘Disaster Loans Program Account’’

for the cost of direct loans authorized by section 7(b) of the Small

Business Act, $712,000,000, to remain available until expended:

Provided, That such costs, including the cost of modifying such

loans, shall be as defined in section 502 of the Congressional Budget

Act of 1974: Provided further, That the amount provided under

this heading is hereby derived by transfer from the amount provided

for ‘‘Disaster Relief’’ in Public Law 109–62: Provided further, That

the amount provided under this heading is designated as an emergency requirement pursuant to section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95

(109th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal

year 2006.

Approved February 18, 2006.

Feb. 18, 2006

[H.R. 4745]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Guidance for School Administrators to Help Reduce the Spread of Seasonal Influenza in K-12 Schools      

# Resource: Guidance for School Administrators to Help Reduce the Spread of Seasonal Influenza in K-12 Schools

This webpage provides guidance to help reduce the spread of seasonal influenza (flu) among students and staff in K-12 schools. **Learn more.**
#### West Gate House, Inc., et al., Respondents, v 860-870 Realty LLC, Formerly Known as 860 Realty Co./870 Realty Co., Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 482]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Edmead, J.), entered on or about September 21, 2003, which, in an action by a residential cooperative against its sponsor’s successor seeking to compel the latter to sell unsold shares, denied defendant’s motion for a preliminary injunction prohibiting plaintiffs from terminating certain proprietary leases held by defendant, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

As the motion court held, in view of recent authority holding a sponsor liable in contract to a cooperative for not undertaking in good faith to timely sell so many shares in the building as necessary to create a fully viable cooperative *(511 W. 232nd Owners Corp. v Jennifer Realty Co.,*98 NY2d 144, 152, 154 [2002]), defendant fails to show a likelihood of success on the merits. We note that the cooperative’s notice objects only to defendant’s re-letting of apartments that are not subject to rent regulation. We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: International Data Explorer (IDE) Updated with New Data      

# Resource: International Data Explorer (IDE) Updated with New Data

This IDE update includes data from the 2015 administration of the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and TIMSS Advanced, which assess students’ mathematics and science knowledge and skills. The IDE is an online, interactive tool that allows users to explore international study data and create customized tables, charts, maps, and analyses.

http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/international/ide/?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Reports
FIRST
        VALLEY BANCORP, INC. FORM
        10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT
 MARCH
        31,
        2006





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First Valley Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J.
      Blum, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








/s/Mark
                J. BlumMark
                J. BlumExecutive
                Vice President, Treasurerand
                CFO










The
      foregoing is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      is
      not being filed as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.






22