alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32-9****Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code**     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofExelon Generation Company, LLC for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, that (i)the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ExelonGeneration Company, LLC.        Date: October 26, 2005 /s/ J. Barry Mitchell   J. Barry Mitchell   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           What Works to Prevent Teen Dating Violence?      

# What Works to Prevent Teen Dating Violence?

Researchers at West Chester University of Pennsylvania assessed teen dating violence prevention programs to determine if they met nine criteria of effective prevention programs. *Safe Dates*, a school-based prevention program, was the only program to meet all criteria and could therefore be called a “model program.”

http://ncfy.acf.hhs.gov/news/2013/02/primary-sources-what-works-prevent-teen-dating-violence
§ 1210.365 Effect of termination or amendment. Unless otherwise expressly provided by the Secretary, the termination of this Plan or any regulation issued pursuant thereto, or the issuance of any amendment to either thereof, shall not: ( a ) Affect or waive any right, duty, obligation, or liability which shall have arisen or which may thereafter arise in connection with any provision of this Plan or any regulation issued thereunder; or
( b ) Release or extinguish any violation of this Plan or any regulation issued thereunder; or
( c ) Affect or impair any rights or remedies of the United States, or of the Secretary, or of any other person with respect to any such violation.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report of 4C Controls Inc.
      on
      Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald Sullivan,
      Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, to my knowledge that:





(1) 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      November 24, 2008




By:
            /s/
                Gerald SullivanName:   
                Gerald SullivanTitle:     
                Principal Financial Officer
#### § 1126.3 Route disposition.

See § 1000.3.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edgen Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel J. OLeary, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 15, 2006



|    |  |                                                        
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ DANIEL J. OLEARY                                  
|    |  | Daniel J. OLeary President and Chief
Executive Officer



37
§ 1206.37 Prohibited activities. The Board may not engage in, and shall prohibit the employees and agents of the Board from engaging in: ( a ) Any action that is a conflict of interest; and
( b ) Using funds collected by the Board under the Order to undertake any action for the purpose of influencing legislation or governmental action or policy, by local, state, national, and foreign governments, other than recommending to the Department amendments to the Order.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 39 (Tuesday, March 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 12188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 5307-004]


Green Mountain Power Corporation, Hydro Power, LLC; Notice of 
Transfer of Exemption

    1. On February 1, 2021, Green Mountain Power Corporation, exemptee 
for the Woodsville Hydroelectric Project No. 5307, filed a letter 
notifying the Commission that the project was transferred from Green 
Mountain Power Corporation to Hydro Power, LLC. The exemption from 
licensing was originally issued on February 5, 1982.\1\ The project is 
located on the Ammonoosuc River, Grafton County, New Hampshire. The 
transfer of an exemption does not require Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ New England Hydro, Inc., and Woodsville Fire District, 18 
FERC 62,158 (1982). On June 27, 2017, the project was transferred to 
Green Mountain Power Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Hydro Power, LLC is now the exemptee of the Woodsville 
Hydroelectric Project No. 5307. All correspondence must be forwarded 
to: Mr. Brandon L. Boudreau, 87 Factory Street, St. Johnsbury, VT 
05819, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#105262717e747f7e505671796252717e7b635d797c7c3e737f7d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4c0e3e2d222823220c0a2d253e0e2d22273f01252020622f2321">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 24, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-04259 Filed 3-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 1146.210 Milk for other programs.

Milk sold or donated under other commodity or food assistance programs administered by the United States Department of Agriculture is not eligible for reimbursement under the Milk Donation Reimbursement Program in this part.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MARTIN AKERMAN,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,

Respondent

______________________

2024-133

______________________

On Petition for Permission to Appeal from the Merit 

Systems Protection Board in No. DC-1221-22-0445-W-2.

______________________

ON PETITION AND MOTION

______________________

Before STOLL, CUNNINGHAM, and STARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Martin Akerman petitions for permission for interlocutory appeal from a May 31, 2024 Acknowledgement Order 

issued by an administrative judge of the Merit Systems 

Protection Board. Mr. Akerman also moves to hold the petition in abeyance, ECF No. 4, and objects to the caption, 

ECF No. 5. We deny the petition and the motions.

Case: 24-133 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 07/05/2024
2 AKERMAN v. AIR FORCE

The May 31, 2024 order is the administrative judge’s 

acknowledgement of the refiling of Mr. Akerman’s appeal 

following dismissal subject to automatic reinstatement. In 

that order, the administrative judge denied a request for 

joinder of the National Guard and reiterated previous rulings as to the scope of the appeal and extent of permitted 

discovery. Mr. Akerman’s petition here asks this court to 

reverse those aspects of the May 31, 2024 order.

In matters from the Board, this court’s jurisdiction is 

generally limited to “an appeal from a final order or final

decision,” 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(9) (emphases added), and 

“an order is final only when it ends the litigation on the 

merits and leaves nothing for the [tribunal] to do but execute the judgment,” Weed v. Social Sec. Admin., 571 F.3d 

1359, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (cleaned up). The May 31, 2024 

order clearly does not resolve the merits of Mr. Akerman’s 

appeal before the Board, which remains pending. And Mr. 

Akerman has not identified, and the court is not aware of, 

any basis for this court’s immediate, interlocutory review 

of the administrative judge’s order under the circumstances. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition and all pending motions are denied.

July 5, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

Case: 24-133 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 07/05/2024
_





 Exhibit 10.1




Financial Consultant Service Agreement


Party A: China Teletech Holding, Inc.

Party B: Ms. Qing Yu (Jane) 


Party A agrees to employ Party B as part-time CFO during the
period from March 5, 2013 to March 4, 2014. 


As CFO, the working scopes include: 




	Preparation of whole set of US GAAP consolidated
financial statements (including disclosure notes and MD&A) based on
financial statements of each subsidiary reviewed or audited by US auditors
quarterly;


	During the employment period, Party B needs to visit
Party A two to three times and three days each time.  All travel expenses shall
be borne by Party A.




Party A shall pay remuneration to Party B by cash and company
common stock of Party A.  Details are as below:




	Party A pay RMB5,000 to Party B by the 10th
day of each month. 







	Party A will pay for 500,000 shares company stock to
Party B when the agreement comes into effect.




This agreement takes effect after being signed by both
parties.  This agreement has made in duplicate, one for each party.




Party A (Stamp):Party B (Signature):



Date: March 4, 2013
##### 



Exhibit 31-7 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, J. Barry Mitchell, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PECO Energy Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: July 26, 2005
    
    /s/ J. Barry MitchellSenior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
 7
#### LARKIN, Appellant, v. McNAMEE et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 9, 1906.)

Action by Patrick Larkin against John Mc-Namee and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, on the ground that the application should be made to the Special Term.
#### 936.202-70 [Reserved]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDelivery performance of conventional aircraft by terminal-area, time-based air traffic control: A real-time simulation evaluationA description and results are presented of a study to measure the performance and reaction of airline flight crews, in a full workload DC-9 cockpit, flying in a real-time simulation of an air traffic control (ATC) concept called Traffic Intelligence for the Management of Efficient Runway-scheduling (TIMER). Experimental objectives were to verify earlier fast-time TIMER time-delivery precision results and obtain data for the validation or refinement of existing computer models of pilot/airborne performance. Experimental data indicated a runway threshold, interarrival-time-error standard deviation in the range of 10.4 to 14.1 seconds. Other real-time system performance parameters measured include approach speeds, response time to controller turn instructions, bank angles employed, and ATC controller message delivery-time errors.Document ID19900009062Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsCredeur, Leonard*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Houck, Jacob A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Capron, William R.*(PRC Kentron, Inc., Hampton VA., United States)*Lohr, Gary W.*(Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ. Daytona Beach, FL., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1990Subject CategoryAircraft Communications And NavigationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2978NASA-TP-2978L-16615Accession Number90N18378Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-66-41-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900009062.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### 923.500 Scope of subpart.

For contracts performed at DOE sites, in lieu of 48 CFR subpart 23.5, contracting activities shall use 923.570, Workplace Substance Abuse Programs at DOE Sites.

[75 FR 69012, Nov. 10, 2010]
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Soltek Pacific Construction Company 

Under Contract No. N62473-15-D-2426 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 62130 

Kirk J. McCormick, Esq. 

Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C. 

Eoston, MA 

Craig D. Jens en, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

David M. Ruddy, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: January 9, 2020 

Administrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62130, Appeal of Soltek Pacific 

Construction Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
9.407-1 General. ( a ) The suspending official may, in the public interest, suspend a contractor for any of the causes in 9.407-2, using the procedures in 9.407-3.
( b ) ( 1 ) Suspension is a serious action to be imposed on the basis of adequate evidence, pending the completion of investigation or legal proceedings, when it has been determined that immediate action is necessary to protect the Government's interest. In assessing the adequacy of the evidence, agencies should consider how much information is available, how credible it is given the circumstances, whether or not important allegations are corroborated, and what inferences can reasonably be drawn as a result. This assessment should include an examination of basic documents such as contracts, inspection reports, and correspondence.
( 2 ) The existence of a cause for suspension does not necessarily require that the contractor be suspended. The suspending official should consider the seriousness of the contractor's acts or omissions and may, but is not required to, consider remedial measures or mitigating factors, such as those set forth in 9.406-1(a). A contractor has the burden of promptly presenting to the suspending official evidence of remedial measures or mitigating factors when it has reason to know that a cause for suspension exists. The existence or nonexistence of any remedial measures or mitigating factors is not necessarily determinative of a contractor's present responsibility.
( c ) Suspension constitutes suspension of all divisions or other organizational elements of the contractor, unless the suspension decision is limited by its terms to specific divisions, organizational elements, or commodities. The suspending official may extend the suspension decision to include any affiliates of the contractor if they are— ( 1 ) Specifically named; and
( 2 ) Given written notice of the suspension and an opportunity to respond (see 9.407-3(c)).
( d ) A contractor's suspension shall be effective throughout the executive branch of the Government, unless the agency head or a designee (except see 26.505(e)) states in writing the compelling reasons justifying continued business dealings between that agency and the contractor.
( e ) ( 1 ) When the suspending official has authority to suspend contractors from both acquisition contracts pursuant to this regulation and contracts for the purchase of Federal personal property pursuant to FPMR 101-45.6, that official shall consider simultaneously suspending the contractor from the award of acquisition contracts and from the purchase of Federal personal property.
( 2 ) When suspending a contractor from the award of acquisition contracts and from the purchase of Federal personal property, the suspension notice shall so indicate and the appropriate FAR and FPMR citations shall be included.
[48 FR 42142, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 4968, Jan. 31, 1989; 54 FR 19816, May 8, 1989; 56 FR 67130, Dec. 27, 1991; 59 FR 67033, Dec. 28, 1994; 84 FR 19845, May 6, 2019; 89 FR 30237, Apr. 22, 2024]
<PAGE>
 
                                                      Exhibit (23)-1
                                                      Unicom Corporation
                                                      Form 10-Q File No. 1-11375



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------
                                        


     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report in this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 1997 (Report), into Unicom Corporation's previously filed
prospectuses dated March 18, 1994, constituting part of Form S-4 Registration
Statement File No. 33-52109, as amended (relating to Common Stock of Unicom
Corporation), as further amended by Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8
(relating to Commonwealth Edison Company's Employee Savings and Investment Plan)
and Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 on Form S-8 (relating to Unicom Corporation's
Employee Stock Purchase Plan); Form S-8 Registration Statement File No. 33-56991
(relating to Unicom Corporation's Long-Term Incentive Plan), Form S-4
Registration Statement File No. 333-01003 (relating to Common Stock of Unicom
Corporation), Form S-8 Registration Statement File No. 333-04749 (relating to
Unicom Corporation's 1996 Directors' Fee Plan); Form S-8 Registration Statements
File Nos. 333-10613 and 333-26779 (relating to Commonwealth Edison Company's
Employee Savings and Investment Plan) and Form S-8 Registration Statement File
No. 333-39677 (relating to the Unicom Corporation Management Deferred
Compensation Plan).  We also consent to the application of our Report to
Commonwealth Edison Company and subsidiary companies' ratios of earnings to
fixed charges and ratios of earnings to fixed charges and preferred and
preference stock dividend requirements for each of the twelve months ended
September 30, 1997 and December 31, 1996 appearing in this Form 10-Q.



                                    Arthur Andersen LLP

 
 



Chicago, Illinois
November 10, 1997