alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST
      VALLEY BANCORP, INC. FORM
      10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT


SEPTEMBER
      30, 2006









CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First Valley Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Mark J. Blum, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                Mark J. BlumMark
                J. BlumExecutive
                Vice President, Treasurerand
                CFO














The
      foregoing is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      is
      not being filed as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.








27
#### *Henry vs. Hughes.*

covenant.

Case 119.

Error to the Nicholas circuit; H. O. Brown, Judge,

*Covenant for personal services not assignable. Declaration, Averment.*

June 11.

Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

“For value received, I promise to pay Robert A. Long, sixty dollars, to be paid in carpenter’s work, whenever the said Long shall call on me for the same. The said work and labor to be estimated at the usual prices for labor of the kind. February 28, 1822,

“JOHN HENRY,

«‘Test, Epw’p. F, Chappell.”

*454A covenant for personal services, not assignable at law, neither ‘stipulating to pay money nor property.’

If this covebie,‘ the deduration deMleglngVctemand, and an assignment,

Depew, for plaintiff.

On this covenant, Jesse Hughes, styling himself as* siguee of Long, instituted an action of covenant. The declaration shows no assignment, it avers none; nor does it aver any demand of the work.

Henry demurred to the declaration. But the court overruled his demurrer, and thereupon, a writ of inquiry being awarded, a verdict and judgment were rendéred in favor of Hughes.

The declaration is radically defective. A demurrer was necessary; and, therefore, some request by Long or Hughes ought to have been alleged.

The covenant is not assignable at law. It is not a writing stipulating for the payment of either money or property. It is for. personal services. A suit could not, therefore, be maintained on it by an assignee.

And if the covenant was assignable, the declaration does not state enough to entitle Hughes to sue. as assignee.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, the verdict set aside, and the cause remanded with.instructions to the circuit court to sustain the depiurrer to the declaration.
873.108 Publicizing contract actions. ( a ) All competitive acquisitions under this part, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, for dollar amounts in excess of the SAT, shall be publicly announced utilizing a medium designed to permit all responsible sources, as appropriate under the provisions of this part, to submit a bid, proposal, or quotation (as appropriate). ( 1 ) The publication medium may include the internet, including the Governmentwide point of entry (GPE), and local, regional or national publications or journals, as appropriate, at the discretion of the contracting officer, depending on the complexity of the acquisition.
( 2 ) Notice shall be published for a reasonable time prior to issuance of a solicitation, depending on the complexity or urgency of the acquisition, in order to afford potential offerors a reasonable opportunity to respond. If the notice includes a complete copy of the request for quotation (RFQ) or solicitation, a prior notice is not required, and the RFQ or solicitation shall be considered to be announced and issued at the same time.
( 3 ) The notice may include contractor qualification parameters, such as time for delivery of service, credentialing or medical certification requirements, small business or other socio-economic preferences, the appropriate small business size standard, and such other qualifications as the contracting officer deems necessary to meet the needs of the Government. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( b ) The requirement for public announcement does not apply to sole source acquisitions described in 873.104(a). However, as required by 38 U.S.C. 8153(a)(3)(D), acquisitions from an institution not affiliated with the VA in accordance with 38 U.S.C. 7302, if conducted on a sole source basis, must still be justified and publicized (see 873.104(b)(2)). (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( c ) For acquisitions below the SAT, a public announcement is optional. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( d ) Each solicitation issued under the procedures in this part must prominently identify that the requirement is being solicited under the authority of 38 U.S.C. 8153 and this part. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. Due to a processing error, we will not be able to meet the 15-calendar notice threshold, but this meeting will still be open. This meeting will still be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 13, 2021.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 336-690-6217.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, April 13, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Conchata Holloway. For more information please contact Cedric Jeans at 1-888-912-1227 or 336-690-6217, or write TAP Office, 4905 Koger Boulevard, Greensboro, NC 27407-2734 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include various IRS issues.                

Dated: March 1, 2021.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2021-04533 Filed 3-4-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer**I, Barry Adcock, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Northside Bancshares, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report. 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’sfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: August 10, 2005         /s/Barry Adcock   Barry Adcock, Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### 970.5201 Text of provisions and clauses.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of American IDC Corp. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Gordon F.
Lee, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of American IDC Corp.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 29, 2004

                                      /s/Gordon F. Lee
                                      Gordon F. Lee
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Gordon F. Lee
                                      Gordon F. Lee
                                      Chief Financial Officer
9904.401-50 Techniques for application. ( a ) The standard allows grouping of homogeneous costs in order to cover those cases where it is not practicable to estimate contract costs by individual cost element or function. However, costs estimated for proposal purposes shall be presented in such a manner and in such detail that any significant cost can be compared with the actual cost accumulated and reported therefor. In any event the cost accounting practices used in estimating costs in pricing a proposal and in accumulating and reporting costs on the resulting contract shall be consistent with respect to: ( 1 ) The classification of elements or functions of cost as direct or indirect;
( 2 ) The indirect cost pools to which each element or function of cost is charged or proposed to be charged; and
( 3 ) The methods of allocating indirect costs to the contract.
( b ) Adherence to the requirement of 9904.401-40(a) of this standard shall be determined as of the date of award of the contract, unless the contractor has submitted cost or pricing data pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 2306a or 41 U.S.C. 254(d) (Pub. L. 87-653), in which case adherence to the requirement of 9904.401-40(a) shall be determined as of the date of final agreement on price, as shown on the signed certificate of current cost or pricing data. Notwithstanding 9904.401-40(b), changes in established cost accounting practices during contract performance may be made in accordance with part 99.
Phantom Stock Agreements








							
	 
	EXHIBIT 10.15


	OMEGA FLEX, INC.

	 

	Phantom Stock Agreements

	 

	Schedule of Directors and Officers

	 

	As of December 31, 2012

	 

	Director/Officer 

	Type 

	Number 

	Grant Date 

	Grant Price 

	Maturity Date 

	Vesting Schedule 


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Dean Rivest

	Full 

	1,500 

	03/03/2010 

	$10.52 

	03/03/2014 

	3 years 


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	03/03/2011 

	$13.14

	03/03/2015

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	02/16/2012 

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Paul Kane

	Full 

	1,500 

	03/03/2010 

	$10.52 

	03/03/2014 

	3 years 


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	03/03/2011 

	$13.14

	03/03/2015

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	02/16/2012 

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Edwin Moran

	Full 

	1,500 

	03/03/2010 

	$10.52 

	03/03/2014 

	3 years 


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	03/03/2011 

	$13.14

	03/03/2015

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	02/16/2012 

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Steven Treichel

	Full 

	2,100 

	03/03/2010 

	$10.52 

	03/03/2014 

	3 years 


	 
	Full

	2,100

	03/03/2011 

	$13.14

	03/03/2015

	3 years


	 
	Full

	2,100

	02/16/2012 

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Timothy Scanlan

	Full 

	1,500 

	03/03/2010 

	$10.52 

	03/03/2014 

	3 years 


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	03/03/2011 

	$13.14

	03/03/2015

	3 years


	 
	Full

	1,500 

	02/16/2012 

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Steven Hockenberry

	Full

	590

	02/16/2012

	$16.68

	02/16/2016

	3 years
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 **CERTIFICATIONS
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of 4C Controls Inc. on Form 10-Q for
        the
        quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerald Sullivan, Principal
        Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
        my
        knowledge that:
 
 (1) 
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) 
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.
 
 Date:
        November 19, 2008
   By:
              /s/
                  Gerald SullivanName:   Gerald
                  SullivanTitle:    
                  Principal Financial Officer
601.602-3 Ratification of unauthorized commitments. ( b ) *Policy.* ( 1 ) The Government generally is not bound by unauthorized commitments. Unauthorized commitments violate the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act, other Federal laws, the FAR, the DOSAR, and proper acquisition practice. Therefore, such unauthorized commitments are serious violations that could result in disciplinary action against the transgressor, e.g., withdrawal of a contracting officer's warrant or a Contracting Officer's Representative delegation or collection action.
( 2 ) ( i ) Unauthorized commitments not exceeding $1,000. The head of the contracting activity is delegated the authority to serve as the ratifying official for unauthorized commitments not exceeding $1,000, including unauthorized commitments from other agencies where a DOS employee serves as the contracting officer for that action. The head of the contracting activity may refer any actions not exceeding $1,000 to the DOS Procurement Executive for ratification if he or she so chooses.
( ii ) Unauthorized commitments exceeding $1,000. All DOS unauthorized commitments in excess of $1,000 shall be submitted to the DOS Procurement Executive for ratification. Unauthorized commitments in excess of $1,000 from other agencies may be referred to the other agency's representative at post for resolution in accordance with that agency's ratification process.
( 3 ) *Claims.* Unauthorized contractual commitments that would involve claims subject to resolution under the Contracts Dispute Act of 1978 shall be processed in accordance with FAR subpart 33.2 and subpart 633.2.
( 4 ) *Disciplinary action.* The Procurement Executive may refer egregious cases of unauthorized commitments to HR/ER for possible disciplinary action in accordance with 3 FAM 4370 or 3 FAM 4540. Examples might include repeated unauthorized commitments knowingly made by an employee; failure to take responsibility for a deliberate unauthorized commitment; or similar reasons. The Procurement Executive may revoke the appointment certificate of any contracting officer who makes an unauthorized commitment. The Procurement Executive may direct a contracting officer to revoke the appointment memorandum of a Contracting Officer's Representative or Government Technical Monitor who makes an unauthorized commitment.
[80 FR 6914, Feb. 9, 2015]
A TTACHMENT I - PRODUCT LIST

EPA Registration Number Product Name 7754 - 41 Bug Barrier II
Panos, Christos

From: Vetterhoffer, Dana <Dana.Vetterhoffer@Illinois.gov>

Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 4:45 PM

To: Panos, Christos

Subject: Midwest Generation variance August 2014 submittal: Part 1

Attachments: removed.txt; Cover Letter for SIP Submittal.pdf; Replacement for original content.htm; Att 2--Agency 

Appearance and Certification of Publication.pdf; Att 3--Board Order accepting petition for hearing.pdf; Att 

4--Notice of Board Hearing.pdf; Att 5--Board Certificate of Publication I.pdf; Att 6--Board Certificate of 

Publication II.pdf; Att 7--Board Certificate of Publication III.pdf; Att 8--Board Certificate of Publication IV.pdf; 

Att 9--Board Certificate of Publication V.pdf; Att 10--Board Certificate of Publication VI.pdf

See attached.

Thanks,

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

This e‐mail and its contents may be a confidential attorney‐client, attorney work product and/or pre‐decisional FOIA‐exempt document intended

solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed.  If you are not an/the intended recipient and have received this e‐mail in error,

please be advised that any use, forwarding, printing or copying of this e‐mail is prohibited.
Panos, Christos

From: Vetterhoffer, Dana <Dana.Vetterhoffer@Illinois.gov>

Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 4:46 PM

To: Panos, Christos

Subject: Midwest Generation variance August 2014 submittal: Part 2

Attachments: removed.txt; Att 11--Agency's Recommendation.pdf; Att 12--Transcript of Hearing-partial.pdf; Att 13--

Hearing Officer Order Verifying Hearing Held.pdf; Att 14--Final Board Order Granting Variance.pdf; Att 15--

Glosser Concurring Opinion.pdf; Att 16--MWG Certificate of Acceptance.pdf; Att 17--Notice of Public 

Information.pdf; Att 18--Verification of No Public Hearing.pdf; Att 19--Agency's Technical Support for SIP 

Submittal.pdf

See attached.

Thanks,

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

This e‐mail and its contents may be a confidential attorney‐client, attorney work product and/or pre‐decisional FOIA‐exempt document intended

solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed.  If you are not an/the intended recipient and have received this e‐mail in error,

please be advised that any use, forwarding, printing or copying of this e‐mail is prohibited.
#### § 1051.17 [Reserved]
From: Janis Hudson

To: Wiley, Adina

Cc: Michael Wilhoit; Mike Wilson

Subject: Flexible Permit Amendment Applications - clarification

Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 5:48:34 PM

The information provided below does not include notice of permits issued under the

Existing Facility Flexible Permit rules, which were adopted by TCEQ in 2002 in §§

116.793 - 116.802 and 116.804 - 116.807 for grandfathered facilities that wanted a

flexible permit as for initial authorization. The TCEQ withdrew these rules from EPA

consideration as a SIP revision at its meeting on September 24, 2013.

From: Janis Hudson 

Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 1:24 PM

To: Adina Wiley

Cc: Michael Wilhoit; Mike Wilson

Subject: Flexible Permit Amendment Applications

You asked that TCEQ provide EPA with data regarding how many flexible permit

amendment applications were subject to public notice requirements, and how many of

those were applications concerned agricultural facilities.

The table below provides the information that the TCEQ’s Air Permits Division has

tracked with regard to the number of flexible permit amendment applications received

over three specific time periods, and how many of those were subject to notice. 

These time periods were chosen to represent:

1. The initial time period for flexible permits (rules adopted in 1994, and first permits

issued in 1995), which were under the notice requirements in effect prior to the

adoption and interpretive rulemaking for HB 2518 (77th Legislature, 2001).

2. The span of FY02 – FY10 is the approximate time period for initial applicability of

HB 2518 and the rule interpreting it (30 Tex. Admin. Code § 39.402). The rule

became effective November 13, 2001.

3. The span of FY11 – FY13 represents the approximate time period for which the

amended rule, which segregated the flexible permit amendment applications in the

rule (30 Tex. Admin. Code § 39.402(a)(5)), has been in effect (beginning June 24,

2010). This rule was submitted to EPA as a SIP revision in July 2010.

Fiscal Year* Time

Periods

Number of Amendment

Applications

Number of Amendment

Applications that Went to

Public Notice

FY94 – FY01 87 0

FY02 – FY10 277 121

FY11 – FY13 49 14
*FY is September 1 – August 31.

A review of the records regarding the holders of flexible permits revealed that only

one was considered to be an agricultural facility, and it was issued in 2006. No permit

amendment applications were filed for that permit, which has subsequently been

deflexed.