alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDynamic ground-effect measurements on the F-15 STOL and Maneuver Technology Demonstrator (S/MTD) configurationA moving-model ground-effect testing method was used to study the influence of rate-of-descent on the aerodynamic characteristics for the F-15 STOL and Maneuver Technology Demonstrator (S/MTD) configuration for both the approach and roll-out phases of landing. The approach phase was modeled for three rates of descent, and the results were compared to the predictions from the F-15 S/MTD simulation data base (prediction based on data obtained in a wind tunnel with zero rate of descent). This comparison showed significant differences due both to the rate of descent in the moving-model test and to the presence of the ground boundary layer in the wind tunnel test. Relative to the simulation data base predictions, the moving-model test showed substantially less lift increase in ground effect, less nose-down pitching moment, and less increase in drag. These differences became more prominent at the larger thrust vector angles. Over the small range of rates of descent tested using the moving-model technique, the effect of rate of descent on longitudinal aerodynamics was relatively constant. The results of this investigation indicate no safety-of-flight problems with the lower jets vectored up to 80 deg on approach. The results also indicate that this configuration could employ a nozzle concept using lower reverser vector angles up to 110 deg on approach if a no-flare approach procedure were adopted and if inlet reingestion does not pose a problem.Document ID19900013215Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsKemmerly, Guy T.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberL-16555NASA-TP-3000NAS 1.60:3000Accession Number90N22531Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-71-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013215.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           WISQARS Mobile: Injury Data Anywhere, Anytime      

# WISQARS Mobile: Injury Data Anywhere, Anytime

WISQARS Mobile, an app developed by the CDC, allows users to easily access injury information, including data on motor vehicle–related injuries, prescription drug overdoses, traumatic brain injuries, violence against children and youth, unintentional injury, homicide, and suicide.

http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/mobile.html?s_cid=rss_injury463
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

!"a$

!"c$

!"c$

!"a$ White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

± Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

?¿

?Â

Aã

?3⁄4

Iz

I}

Iv

Iv

Iz

Map 3-12

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Areas

Wilderness Characteristics

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Management Unit

Lands Identified as Having

Wilderness Characteristics

Public Proposal Lands

Identified as Having

Wilderness Characteristics
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 
 ADDENDUM #5 TO THE 
 CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY MANAGEMENT SERVICES

 AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN 
 CEDAR MANAGEMENT LIMITED (“MANAGER”) 

AND 

AMERINST INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. (“COMPANY”) 
 EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2013 
 Management Agreement Addendum 

 

	 	1)	It is hereby agreed that the COMPANY will compensate MANAGER at a rate of $320,000 for the twelve months beginning 1/1/13 and ending 12/31/13, which shall be inclusive
of all work by MANAGER on run-off of CAMICO and PDIC treaties as well as continuing business from Crum & Forster. 

  

	 	2)	Cause the above fee to be paid in quarterly installments in advance at the beginning of each calendar quarter. 


 

	 	3)	Reimburse MANAGER for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred during the management of the COMPANY including; courier and express mail service; long distance
telephone calls; travel and meeting expenses incurred at the request of the COMPANY; costs of COMPANY stationery; filing fees; and similar expenses. 

  

	 	4)	MANAGER will continue to provide COMPANY with monthly time summaries. 

 COMPANY agrees that special projects will be invoiced separately at agreed upon fees or rates. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Addendum this 28th day of February, 2013. 

 

			
	 By:
	 	 /S/ THOMAS R.
MCMAHON

		 	Cedar Management Limited (itself and on behalf of its affiliated companies)
		
	 By:
	 	 /S/ STUART H. GRAYSTON

		 	AmerInst Insurance Company, Ltd.
<PAGE>
 

                                                     Exhibit (23)-2
                                                     Commonwealth Edison Company
                                                     Form 10-Q File No. 1-1839



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------



     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report in this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 1997 (Report), into Commonwealth Edison Company's (the Company)
previously filed prospectuses as follows: (1) prospectus dated August 21, 1986,
constituting part of Form S-3 Registration Statement File No. 33-6879, as
amended (relating to the Company's Debt Securities and Common Stock); (2)
prospectus dated January 7, 1994, constituting part of Form S-3 Registration
Statement File No. 33-51379 (relating to the Company's Debt Securities and
Cumulative Preference Stock); and (3) prospectus dated September 19, 1995,
constituting part of Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 Registration Statement File No.
33-61343, as amended (relating to Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable
Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trust). We also consent to the application of
our Report to the ratios of earnings to fixed charges and the ratios of earnings
to fixed charges and preferred and preference stock dividend requirements for
each of the twelve months ended March 31, 1997 and December 31, 1996 appearing
in this Form 10-Q.


                                           ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
 
Chicago, Illinois
May 9, 1997
Exhibit 32.3

         Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
         --------------------------------------------------------------
                               United States Code
                               ------------------

         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
     Form 10-Q of  Commonwealth  Edison  Company for the quarterly  period ended
     June 30, 2003, that (i) the report fully complies with the  requirements of
     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the
     information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commonwealth
     Edison Company.



     Date:  July 30, 2003                   /s/ Michael B. Bemis
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Michael B. Bemis
                                            President
                                            Exelon Energy Delivery
917.7301-1 General. ( a ) PRDAs shall be used to provide potential proposers with information concerning DOE's interest in entering into arrangements for research, development, and related projects in specified areas of interest. It is DOE's intent to solicit the submission of ideas which will serve as a basis for research, development, and related activities in the energy field. It is DOE's desire to encourage the involvement of small business concerns, small disadvantage business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns in research and development undertaken pursuant to PRDAs.
( b ) The PRDA should not replace existing acquisition procedures where a requirement can be sufficiently defined for solicitation under standard advertised or negotiated acquisition procedures. Similarly, it should not inhibit or curtail the submission of unsolicited proposals. However, a proposal which is submitted as though it were unsolicited but is in fact germane to an existing PRDA shall be treated as though submitted in response to the announcement or returned without action to the proposer, at the proposer's option. Further, the PRDA is not to be used in a competitive situation where it is appropriate to negotiate a study contract to obtain analysis and recommendations to be incorporated in the subsequent request for proposals.
[61 FR 41707, Aug. 9, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 7693, Feb. 11, 2011]
970.4207-03-02 Certificate of costs. ( a ) The contracting officer shall require that management and operating contractors provide a submission, pursuant to 970.5232-2-(j), for settlement of costs incurred during the period stipulated on the submission and a certification that the costs included in the submission are allowable. The contracting officer shall assess a penalty pursuant to 970.5242-1 if unallowable costs are included in the submission. Unallowable costs are either expressly unallowable or determined unallowable. ( 1 ) An expressly unallowable cost is a particular item or type of cost which, under the express provisions of an applicable law, regulation, or this contract, is specifically named and stated to be unallowable.
( 2 ) A cost determined unallowable is one which, for that contractor— ( i ) Was subject to a contracting officer's final decision and not appealed;
( ii ) The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals or a court has previously ruled as unallowable; or
( iii ) Was mutually agreed to be unallowable.
( b ) If, during the review of the submission, the contracting officer determines that the submission contains an expressly unallowable cost or a cost determined to be unallowable prior to the submission, the contracting officer shall assess a penalty.
( c ) If the contracting officer determines that a cost submitted by the contractor in its submission for settlement is: ( 1 ) Expressly unallowable, then the contracting officer shall assess a penalty in an amount equal to the disallowed cost allocated to the contract plus interest on the paid portion of the disallowed cost. Interest shall be computed from the date of overpayment to the date of repayment using the interest rate specified by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 92-41 (85 Stat. 97).
( 2 ) Determined unallowable, then the contracting officer shall assess a penalty in an amount equal to two times the amount of the disallowed cost allocated to the contract.
( d ) The contracting officer may waive the penalty provisions when: ( 1 ) The contractor withdraws the submission before the formal initiation of an audit of the submission and submits a revised submission;
( 2 ) The amount of the unallowable costs allocated to covered contracts is $10,000 or less; or
( 3 ) The contractor demonstrates to the contracting officer's satisfaction that: ( i ) It has established appropriate policies, personnel training, and an internal control and review system that provides assurances that unallowable costs subject to penalties are precluded from the contractor's submission for settlement of costs; and
( ii ) The unallowable costs subject to the penalty were inadvertently incorporated into the submission.
( e ) The Head of the Contracting Activity may waive the certification when— ( 1 ) It determines that it would be in the best interest of the United States to waive such certification; and
( 2 ) It states in writing the reasons for that determination and makes such determination available to the public.
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36374, July 22, 2009]
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Juniper Partners Acquisition
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Stuart B. Rekant, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Stuart B. Rekant                                  Dated: August 24, 2005
    -------------------------------
    Stuart B. Rekant
    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
```
#### Rosemarie Librandi et al., Appellants, v Stop and Shop Food Stores, Inc., Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 846]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc. the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated September 4, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To establish a prima facie case of negligence, a plaintiff in a slip-and-fall action must demonstrate that the defendant either created the condition that caused the accident, or had actual or constructive notice thereof *(see Pomerantz v Culinary Inst. of Am., 2*AD3d 821 [2003]; *Luciani v Waldbaum, Inc.,*304 AD2d 537 [2003]; *Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc.,*297 AD2d 277 [2002]; *Stumacher v Waldbaum, Inc.,*274 AD2d 572 [2000]; *Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc.,*248 AD2d 436 [1998]; *Kraemer v K-Mart Corp.,*226 AD2d 590 [1996]). To constitute constructive notice, a defect must be visible and apparent, and it must exist for a sufficient length of time before the accident to permit the defendant or its employees to discover and remedy it *(see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History,*67 NY2d 836, 837 [1986]).

The plaintiffs do not contend that the defendant created the allegedly defective condition, or had actual notice of it. Rather, their position is limited to the contention that there is an issue of fact regarding the defendant’s constructive notice of the subject condition. On a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint based upon a lack of constructive notice, the de*680fendant is required to make a prima facie showing affirmatively establishing the absence of such notice as a matter of law *(see West v DeJesus,*306 AD2d 402 [2003]; *Bachrach v Waldbaum, Inc.,*261 AD2d 426 [1999]; *Goldman v Waldbaum, Inc.,*248 AD2d 436 [1998]). In this case, the defendant succeeded in making such a showing. In opposition thereto, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]; *Bachrach v Waldbaum, Inc., supra).*

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Smith, J.P., H. Miller, S. Miller and Luciano, JJ., concur.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                            ------------------------


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT



                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 2, 1998


                          NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
          (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



New Jersey                   1-640                    13-5267260
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other       (Commission File No.)     (Employer ID No.)
jurisdiction of
incorporation)



16825 Northchase Dr., Suite 1200, Houston, Texas              77060
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                 (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (281) 423-3300
                                                     -------------- 

                          Not Applicable
  (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




<PAGE>


Item 5.           Other Events.


         On July 2,  1998,  the  Registrant  issued the press  release  attached
hereto  as  Exhibit  99.1  and  incorporated  herein  in its  entirety  by  this
reference.


Item 7.           Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and
                  Exhibits.


         (c)      Exhibits

                  (i)      Exhibit 99.1.   Press Release dated July 2, 1998.



                              *      *      *      *      *




                                        SIGNATURE



         Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the  Registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                                      NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                                      (Registrant)



                                                      /s/ David B. Garten
                                                      ------------------------
                                                      David B. Garten
                                                      Vice President, Secretary
                                                      & General Counsel



Dated: July 7, 1998
#### 970.2204-1 Statutory and regulatory requirements.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 22, 2013





NOBLE ENERGY, INC.


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware001-0796473-0785597(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)CommissionFile Number(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)100 Glenborough Drive, Suite 100Houston, Texas77067(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (281) 872-3100


(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)


oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)


oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))


oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





---




Item 8.01. Other Events.


On April 22, 2013, Noble Energy, Inc. issued a press release announcing that its Board of Directors has approved (i) a two-for-one stock split and (ii) a quarterly cash dividend of $0.28 per share of common stock.  The stock split will be effected in the form of a 100% stock dividend payable on May 28, 2013 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on May 14, 2013.  The press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.


|    |                                                                                     
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(d) | Exhibits. The following exhibit is filed as part of this current report on Form 8-K:

99.1Press Release dated April 22, 2013 announcing two-for-one stock split and declaring quarterly dividend.





---







SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.





NOBLE ENERGY, INC.Date:April 22, 2013By:/s/ Kenneth M. FisherKenneth M. FisherSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer





---




INDEX TO EXHIBITS





Exhibit No.Description99.1Press Release dated April 22, 2013 announcing two-for-one stock split and declaring quarterly dividend.