alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Charting the Course: Supporting the Career Development of Youth with Learning Disabilities      

# Charting the Course: Supporting the Career Development of Youth with Learning Disabilities

This Guide was developed to help youth service professionals better understand issues related to learning disabilities so that they can help youth with learning disabilities develop individual strategies that will enable them to succeed in the workplace.

http://www.ncwd-youth.info/ld-guide
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors


Noble Energy, Inc.:





We consent to the use of our reports with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting incorporated by reference herein and to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the prospectus.


/s/ KPMG LLPHouston, TexasFebruary 7, 2013
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1045 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve dependent coverage under 

the TRICARE Young Adult Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Mr. RYAN (for himself, Mr. WALTZ, Ms. SCANLON, Ms. WILLIAMS of Georgia, 

Ms. DEAN of Pennsylvania, Ms. STRICKLAND, Ms. ROSS, Mrs. WATSON

COLEMAN, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. SALAZAR, Mr. 

MOULTON, Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. PETERS, Mr. COHEN, Ms. 

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. EVANS, Ms. TITUS, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, 

Mr. COSTA, Mr. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Mr. TURNER, Ms. STEVENS, 

Ms. WILD, Ms. UNDERWOOD, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. CASTEN, 

Mr. ALLRED, Mr. LYNCH, Ms. KAPTUR, Ms. MANNING, Mr. NEGUSE, 

Mr. MORELLE, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. MOSKOWITZ, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. 

FOSTER, Mr. COURTNEY, Ms. NORTON, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. LAMBORN, Mrs. LESKO, Ms. HOULAHAN, Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. 

HAYES, Mr. CARTER of Louisiana, Mr. GOTTHEIMER, Mr. ESPAILLAT, 

and Mr. DUNN of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve dependent 

coverage under the TRICARE Young Adult Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1045 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Fairness 

3 for Military Families Act of 2023’’. 

4 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO DEPENDENT COVERAGE 

5 UNDER TRICARE YOUNG ADULT PROGRAM. 

6 (a) EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY.—Section 1110b of 

7 title 10, United States Code, is amended in subsection 

8 (b)— 

9 (1) by striking paragraph (3); and 

10 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 

11 paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively. 

12 (b) ELIMINATION OF SEPARATE PREMIUM FOR A

13 YOUNG ADULT.—Section 1110b of such title is further 

14 amended by striking subsection (c). 

15 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1075(c)(3) 

16 of such title is amended by striking ‘‘section 1076d, 

17 1076e, or 1110b’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1076d or 

18 1076e’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Companys annual
report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                     |  |  |  |                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ CHANE GRAZIANO            
|                     |  |  |  | Name: Chane Graziano          
|                     |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### Catherine Panagakos, Appellant, v Oxford Health Plans, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[776 NYS2d 880]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J), entered December 20, 2002, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the third cause of action to recover damages for fraud.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“The essential elements of a cause of action for fraud are ‘representation of a material existing fact, falsity, *scienter,*deception and injury’ ” *(New York Univ. v Continental Ins. Co., 87*NY2d 308, 318 [1995], quoting *Channel Master Corp. v Aluminium Ltd. Sales,*4 NY2d 403, 407 [1958] [emphasis supplied]). In response to the defendants’ prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 852 [1985]), the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendants falsely represented the coverage she would receive under the “Oxford Medicare Advantage” plan. Therefore, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the third cause of action to recover damages for fraud.

In light of our determination, we do not reach the remaining contentions. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Greene, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 527]

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Cortland County (Smith, J.), rendered January 24, 2003, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of attempted robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the second degree.

After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of attempted robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the second degree. Through counsel, he then negotiated an agreement two months prior to sentencing whereby he waived his right to appeal in exchange for being sentenced as a predicate felon *(see*Penal Law § 70.06) rather than as a persistent felon *(see*Penal Law § 70.10). In accordance with the agreement, defendant was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of 10 years and seven years, respectively, followed by a five-year period of postrelease supervision.

Defendant now appeals, arguing that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and should not be enforced. His challenge is unpreserved, however, as he did not move to vacate the judgment of conviction *(see People v Kirkland, 2*AD3d 1063, 1063 [2003]; *People v Gonzalez,*299 AD2d 581, 582 [2002]). In any event, had he done so, the record sufficiently confirms that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal. The written waiver contained in the record was executed by defendant in the presence of his counsel and he acknowledged in writing that he had been advised of his rights regarding an appeal. Defendant received the bargained-for benefit, and he does not claim that he was coerced or his counsel failed to properly advise him. Thus, we find the waiver to be valid and enforceable effectively foreclosing appellate review of each of the issues defendant has raised here *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 10-11 [1989]; *People v De Berardinis,*304 AD2d 914, 916 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 580 [2003]), even though County Court did *924not inquire on the record as to its voluntariness (see *People v Shea,*254 AD2d 512, 513 [1998]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
§ 1.218 How much will I be charged? ( a ) In the event that a demand is granted, the Department may charge reasonable fees. The appropriate Department official will determine all fees, if any, associated with this subpart and shall timely notify you of the fees, particularly those that are to be paid in advance.
( b ) When a demand is granted under this subchapter to permit an employee to testify, you must pay the witness the fee and expenses, including any travel related costs, prescribed for attendance by the applicable rule of court. If no such fees are prescribed, the local Federal district court rule relating to witness fees for the Federal district court closest to where the witness appears will apply.
( c ) When a demand is granted under this subchapter to produce documents, blueprints, electronic tapes, or other official information, the fees to be charged and paid prior to production shall be calculated as provided in Department regulations implementing the fee provisions of the FOIA.
**EXHIBIT 99.906 CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuantto Section 906**

**ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**Registrant:Nicholas Fund, Inc.**

**Form:N-CSR Semiannual Report dated September 30, 2023**

 

I, David O. Nicholas, hereby certify thatto the best of my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

| Date:  | 11/29/2023                                              |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ David O.  Nicholas                                  |   |
|   | David O.  Nicholas, President (Chief Executive Officer) |   |

 

I, Jennifer R. Kloehn, hereby certify thatto the best of my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

| Date:  | 11/29/2023                                               |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ Jennifer R.  Kloehn                                  |   |
|   | Jennifer R.  Kloehn, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) |   |

 

 

*This certificate is furnished pursuant to therequirements of Form N-CSR and shall not be deemed "filed" forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwisesubject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Herbert C. Cohen, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former County Court, Queens- County, rendered November 7, 1960 after a jury trial, convicting him of possession with intent to sell and distribute an obscene magazine (Penal Law; J 1141), and imposing sentence. '• Judgment reversed on the law; indictment dismissed; line directed to be remitted; and bail directed to be exonerated. The findings 'of fact implicit in the verdict are affirmed. We are- constrained by the determinations in *Sunshine Book Co.*v. *Summerfield*(355 U. S. 372) and *Matter of Excelsior Pictures Corp.*v. *Regents*(3 N Y 2d 237, mot. *for*rearg. den., 3 N Y 2d 942) to hold that the 1958 Annual Edition of the magazine “ Sunshine and Health ” is not obscene. 1-f we were not required as matter of law to reach such conclusion, we would have affirmed the judgment. , (For, decision on motion to dismiss indictment, see 22 Misc 2d 722; and for decision on motion for certificate of reasonable doubt, see 208 N. Y. S. 2d 49.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350








In connection with the Form 10-Q of Tri-Valley Corporation for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, I, John E. Durbin, Chief Financial Officer of Tri-Valley Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tri-Valley Corporation.














Date:
May 9, 2011By:
/s/ John E. DurbinJohn E. Durbin, Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### The T. A. Snider Preserve Company for use of Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, appellant, v. The Peoples Trust & Savings Bank of Chicago, appellee.

Gen. 33,578.

Opinion filed December 31, 1929.

Rehearing denied January 10, 1930.

Schuyler, Weinfeld *&*Parker, for appellant; Carl. J. Appell, Henry E. Jacobs and Howard D. Moses, of counsel. Dent, Dobyns & Freeman, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB/A
American Ammunition, Inc.
File No. 0-32379

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of American  Ammunition,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-KSB/A for the period  ending  December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Andres F.  Fernandez,  Chief  Executive  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 16, 2007        By:     /s/ Andres F. Fernandez
      -----------------            -------------------------------
                                   Andres F. Fernandez
                                   Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  American  Ammunition,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  American
Ammunition,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TE XAS

N O

. W R

- 8 3

, 2 7 4

- 0 2

E X P A R T E T Y R O N E C A D E

, A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R P O S T

- C O N V I C T I O N W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S

I N C A U S E N O

. F 1 1

- 3 3 9 6 2

- R I N T H E 2 6 5 D I S T R I C T C O U R T T H

D A L L A S C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m

.

O R D E R

I n A u g u s t 2 0 1 2

, a j u r y f o u n d a p p l i c a n t g u i l t y o f t h e o f f e n s e o f c a p i t a l m u r d e r

. S e e

T E X

. P E N A L C O D E § 1 9

. 0 3 ( a )

. B a s e d o n t h e j u r y ’ s a n s w e r s t o t h e s t a t u t o r y p u n i s h m e n t

q u e s t i o n s

, t h e t r i a l c o u r t s e n t e n c e d h i m t o d e a t h

. O n A p r i l 2 8

, 2 0 1 4

, t h e S t a t e f i l e d i n 1

t h i s C o u r t i t s b r i e f o n a p p l i c a n t ’ s d i r e c t a p p e a l

. P u r s u a n t t o A r t i c l e 1 1

. 0 7 1 § § 4 ( a ) a n d

See Art. 37.071. Unless other wise indicate d all ref

ere nces to Ar

ticles ref er to the Code 1

of Criminal Procedur e.Cade - 2

( b )

, a p p l i c a n t ’ s i n i t i a l a p p l i c a t i o n f o r a w r i t o f h a b e a s c o r p u s w a s d u e t o b e f i l e d i n t h e

t r i a l c o u r t o n o r b e f

o r e S e p t e m b e r 1 0

, 2 0 1 4

, a s s u m i n g a m o t i o n f o r a n e x t e n s i o n w a s

t i m e l y f i l e d a n d g r a n t e d

.

O n D e c e m b e r 1 6

, 2 0 1 5

, b e c a u s e i t h a d b e e n m o r e t h a n a y e a r s i n c e t h e a p p l i c a t i o n

w a s d u e i n t h e t r i a l c o u r t

, t h i s C o u r t o r d e r e d t h e t r i a l c o u r t t o r e s o l v e a n y r e m a i n i n g i s s u e s

i n t h e c a s e w i t h i n 1 8 0 d a y s f r o m t h e d a t e o f t h e o r d e r

. O n S e p t e m b e r 1 3

, 2 0 1 6

, t h i s C o u r t

g r a n t e d a n e x t e n s i o n f

r o m t h e t r i a l c o u r t t o f

o r w a r d t h e c a s e t o t h i s C o u r t b y N o v e m b e r

3 0

, 2 0 1 6

. W e h a v e n o t r e c e i v e d t h e r e c o r d i n t h i s c a s e

. T h e r e f o r e

, t h e t r i a l c o u r t i s

o r d e r e d t o r e s o l v e a n y r e m a i n i n g i s s u e s i n t h e c a s e a n d h a v e t h e c l e r k t r a n s m i t t h e

c o m p l e t e w r i t r e c o r d t o t h i s C o u r t w i t h i n 6 0 d a y s o f t h e d a t e o f t h i s o r d e r

. A n y

e x t e n s i o n s o f t i m e s h a l l b e r e q u e s t e d b y t h e t r i a l j u d g e

, o r o n h i s o r h e r b e h a l f

, a n d

o b t a i n e d f

r o m t h i s C o u r t

.

I T I S S O O R D E R E D T H I S T H E 2 9 D A Y O F M A R C H

, 2 0 1 7

. T H

D o N o t P u b l i s h
916.504 Indefinite-quantity contracts. ( c ) The contracting officer shall establish minimum ordering guarantees with each awardee for all indefinite-quantity, multiple award contracts to ensure that adequate consideration exists to contractually bind each awardee to participate in the ordering process throughout the term of the multiple award contract. Minimum ordering guarantees should be equal among all awardees, and shall be determined on a case-by-case basis for each acquisition commensurate with the size, scope and complexity of the contract requirements.
[62 FR 53757, Oct. 16, 1997]
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form
10-Q of Madison Explorations Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, I
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Madison Explorations Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fairly
presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Madison Explorations Inc..

/s/ Steven Cozine By: Steven CozineTitle:
Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 12, 2008

---
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-50360

Summary Calendar

THRESSA A. TERRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(USDC No. A-95-CV-287)

January 9, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM*:

Thressa A. Terry appeals the district court’s judgment

affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of supplemental

security benefits and disability insurance benefits to Terry.

Terry argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in his

determination that she was not disabled because she was able to

perform the duties of her past relevant work as a gift shop manager

and cashier. She contends that the ALJ failed to consider all of
2

her impairments and relied on the medical opinion of one doctor to

the exclusion of all others. After thoroughly reviewing the

record, we find that Terry’s assertions lack merit and that the

ALJ’s findings are supported by substantial evidence.

Terry argues that the district court erred in failing to

remand to the Commissioner for consideration of a report by

psychologist George Parker, Ph.D., who opined that Terry was

unable to perform any substantial gainful activity because of her

physical impairments, pain, and depression. The district court did

not err because Terry failed to show good cause for her failure to

submit the evidence earlier. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Ripley v.

Chater, 67 F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir. 1995).

Terry also argues that she was disabled due to her age and

because she could no longer perform the math skills required of a

cashier. Terry failed to raise these issues in her appeal to the

Appeals Council. This court has jurisdiction to review the

Commissioner’s final decision only when a claimant has exhausted

her administrative remedies. Paul v. Shalala, 29 F.3d 208, 210

(5th. Cir. 1994). Terry’s failure to raise these issues before the

Appeals Council deprives this court of jurisdiction to review them.

See id. These claims are dismissed for want of jurisdiction

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.