alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1223 

To rescind certain balances made available to the Internal Revenue Service 

and redirect them to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2023 

Ms. TENNEY (for herself and Mr. BABIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the 

Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To rescind certain balances made available to the Internal 

Revenue Service and redirect them to the U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Diverting IRS Re5 sources to the Exigent Crisis Today Act’’ or the ‘‘DI6 RECT Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1223 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF CERTAIN BALANCES MADE AVAIL2 ABLE TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The unobligated balances of 

4 amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for en5 forcement activities of the Internal Revenue Service by 

6 section 10301(1)(A)(ii) of Public Law 117–169 (com7 monly known as the ‘‘Inflation Reduction Act’’) as of the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act are rescinded. 

9 (b) REDIRECTION OF FUNDS TO U.S. CUSTOMS AND

10 BORDER PROTECTION.—There is appropriated to the U.S. 

11 Customs and Border Protection for the salaries and ex12 penses of new agents and officers hired for the security 

13 of the southern border of the United States an amount 

14 equal to the amount rescinded pursuant to subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Dennis Duncan, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, entered May 8, 1964, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment for criminal negligence in- the operation of an automobile resulting in death (Penal Law, § 1053-a), on the ground that the evidence before the Grand Jury was insufficient in law to warrant the finding of the indictment. Order reversed on the law; motion denied; and indictment reinstated. No questions of fact were considered. In our opinion, the evidence submitted to the Grand Jury was sufficient to warrant the indictment (see Code Crim. Pro., § 251). (For prior decision reversing judgment of conviction, and granting a new trial to defendant, see 15 A D 2d 581.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### 841.501 Solicitation provision and contract clauses.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.3

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-95908, 333-64044, 333-100310, and 333-109882 on Form S-8 of Vermont Pure
Holdings, Ltd. of our report, dated December 14, 2001, appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Vermont Pure Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended October
31, 2003.

                                              /s/ Feldman Sherb & Co., P.C
                                                  Feldman Sherb & Co., P.C
                                                  Certified Public Accountants

New York, New York
January 23, 2004
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer**
I, Barry Adcock, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Northside Bancshares, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report.
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;
4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’sfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: June 20, 2005     /s/Barry Adcock     Barry Adcock, Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
§ 1131.31 Payroll reports. ( a ) On or before the 20th day after the end of each month, each handler that operates a pool plant pursuant to § 1131.7 and each handler described in § 1000.9(c) shall report to the market administrator its producer payroll for such month, in the detail prescribed by the market administrator, showing for each producer: ( 1 ) The month;
( 2 ) The producer's name and address;
( 3 ) The daily and total pounds of milk received from the producer;
( 4 ) The total butterfat content of such milk; and
( 5 ) The price per hundredweight, the gross amount due, the amount and nature of any deductions, and the net amount paid.
( b ) Each handler operating a partially regulated distributing plant who elects to make payment pursuant to § 1000.76(b) shall report for each dairy farmer who would have been a producer if the plant had been fully regulated in the same manner as prescribed for reports required by paragraph (a) of this section.
#### § 1150.275 Inspection and investigation.

The Secretary shall have the right, at any time after an application is received from an organization, to examine such books, documents, papers, records, files, and facilities of an organization as he deems necessary to verify the information submitted and to procure such other information as may be required to determine whether the organization is eligible for certification.
Exhibit 4.22


To:
Banc of America Securities Limited as Agent, and Syngenta AG as the CompanyFrom:
Syngenta AG

Schwarzwaldallee 215

4058 Basel

SwitzerlandDated:
September, 2014
 
  Syngenta AG –  US$1,500,000,000 Facilities Agreement
 dated 2nd November 2012 (the “Agreement”)
   1.
We refer to the Facilities Agreement. This is an Extension Request. Terms defined in the Facilities Agreement have the same meaning in this Agreement unless given a different meaning in this Agreement.
  2.
We refer to Clause 3 (Extension of the Termination Date) of the Facilities Agreement.
  3.
We wish to request through you that each Lender extend in the case of a First Anniversary Extending Lender the Termination Date for a period of a further one year.
  4.
We confirm that the Repeating Representations are true and correct in all material respects as at the date hereof.
        /s/ John Ramsay

/s/ Daniel MichaelisJohn Ramsay

Chief Financial Officer

Daniel Michaelis

Senior Counsel
    
  
 
 
 20th October 2014
 
 Syngenta AG
 Schwarzwaldallee 215
 4058 Basel
 Switzerland
 
 Attn:
John Ramsey, Chief Financial Officer
 Daniel Michaelis, Senior Counsel
 
 CC - The Lenders
 
 
 Dear Sirs,
 
 USD 1,500,000,000 Facilities Agreement dated 2nd November 2012 (the “Agreement”) .
 
 Further to your Second Extension request dated 26th September 2014 (dated September 2014) in accordance with clause 3.2(a) of the above mentioned agreement, we are pleased to confirm that all Lenders have agreed to the Second Extension Request, and the Facility has now been extended for a further year to 1st November 2019.
 
 Yours faithfully
 
  
 Karen Hall
 Assistant Vice President
 EMEA Agency Management
 Tel: +44 (0)20 7996 4509
 Email: karen.hall@baml.com
 
 
 
 
 
 Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited
 2 King Edward Street, London EC1A 1HQ
 Wholly-owned subsidiaryof Bankof America, N.A.
 Registered Office: 2 King Edward Street, London EC1A 1HQ, United Kingdom
 Company no. 1009248 England V.A.T. Registrationno. GB 245 1224 93
 Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Israel Technology Acquisition Corp.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Israel
      Frieder, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
              /s/ Israel
                Frieder
              
              
              Dated:
                November 14,
                2006Israel
                FriederChairman
                  of the
                  Board and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal Executive Officer)
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**278.2 CA 10-00872**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

EMMA HARTSOCK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TEMPORARY GUARDIAN OF THE PERSON AND PROPERTY OF ROY A. HARTSOCK, PLAINTIFF,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBERT T. SCACCIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, NASH-CAR SALES & SERVICE, E. DAVID NASHWINTER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, JULIE’S SEABREEZE RESTAURANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

LAW OFFICES OF TAYLOR & SANTACROSE, BUFFALO (DESTIN C. SANTACROSE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DIXON & HAMILTON, LLP, GETZVILLE (MICHAEL B. DIXON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered February 8, 2010. The order granted the motion of defendants Nash-Car Sales & Service and E. David Nashwinter for summary judgment dismissing defendant Robert T. Scaccia’s cross claim against them.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Hartsock v Scaccia ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [May 6, 2011]).

Entered: May 6, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Framing Adolescent Development During the COVID-19 Pandemic      

# Resource: Framing Adolescent Development During the COVID-19 Pandemic

This framing guide (PDF, 7 pages) from the FrameWorks Institute and Funders for Adolescent Science Translation shares five ways to talk more effectively about adolescent development in the era of COVID-19, as some of the necessary conditions for healthy adolescent development have been disrupted by the pandemic.**Learn more (PDF, 7 pages)**.
#### Andra Jankaitis, appellee, v. Fort Dearborn Automobile Insurance Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 34,593.

Opinion filed April 15, 1931.

Rehearing denied April 27, 1931.

Alden, Latham & Young, for appellant; Hobart P. Young and Paul M. Mitchell, of counsel.

Binar C. Howard, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Friend

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose R. Cintron, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 919]

*828Mercure, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Czajka, J.), rendered June 19, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

In March 2001, defendant was arrested after he dropped a loaded handgun while fleeing the scene of a traffic stop. Approximately one year later, he was charged in an indictment with two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. After County Court denied his motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he had been denied his right to a speedy trial, defendant pleaded guilty to both counts of the indictment, preserving his right to appeal. County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of *AH%*years and 2 to 4 years. Defendant appeals, asserting that he was denied his statutory and constitutional rights to a speedy trial.

We affirm. Initially, we note that “[b]y pleading guilty, defendant waived appellate review of his statutory right to a speedy trial under CPL 30.30” *(People v Smith,*272 AD2d 679, 681 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 938 [2000]; *see People v Benjamin,*296 AD2d 666, 667 [2002]). In contrast, defendant’s claim that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial survived his guilty plea *(see People v Allen,*86 NY2d 599, 602 [1995]). Nevertheless, applying the factors set forth in *People v Taranovich*(37 NY2d 442, 445 [1975]), we conclude that defendant’s claim is unavailing. We note that the time period between defendant’s arrest and his indictment was one year and five days, well within the statute of limitations *(see*CPL 30.10 [2] [b]; *People v Coggins,*308 AD2d 635, 635-636 [2003]), his freedom was not impaired by the delay inasmuch as he was incarcerated for a parole violation in June 2001 *(see People v Hernandez,*306 AD2d 751, 752 [2003]), and there is no evidence that his defense was impaired in any way as a result of the delay *(see People v Benjamin, supra*at 667). Finally, we reject as meritless defendant’s argument that the sentence imposed by County Court was harsh and excessive.

Cardona, P.J., Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Nicor Inc.
                                                                      Form 10-Q
                                                                  Exhibit 32.01

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nicor Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
   quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
   requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
   Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
   Company.


  Dated: August 4, 2005        /s/ RUSS M. STROBEL
         --------------        -------------------------------------
                               Russ M. Strobel
                               President and Chief Executive Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1195 

To require the Secretary of Energy to complete a long-range strategic review 

of the Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve and the Northeast Gasoline 

Supply Reserve, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2023 

Mr. PAPPAS (for himself, Mr. WILLIAMS of New York, and Mr. LAWLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to complete a longrange strategic review of the Northeast Home Heating 

Oil Reserve and the Northeast Gasoline Supply Reserve, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bolstering Northeast 

5 Heating Oil and Gasoline Reserves Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1195 IH

1 SEC. 2. NORTHEAST PETROLEUM PRODUCT RESERVES MIS2 SION READINESS OPTIMIZATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

4 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy 

5 shall— 

6 (1) complete a long-range strategic review of 

7 the Northeast Petroleum Product Reserves; and 

8 (2) develop and submit to Congress a proposed 

9 action plan, including a proposed implementation 

10 schedule, that— 

11 (A) specifies near- and long-term roles of 

12 the Northeast Petroleum Product Reserves rel13 ative to the energy and economic security goals 

14 and objectives of the United States; 

15 (B) describes whether existing legal au16 thorities that govern the policies, configuration, 

17 and capabilities of the Northeast Petroleum 

18 Product Reserves are adequate to ensure that 

19 the Northeast Petroleum Product Reserves can 

20 meet the current and future energy and eco21 nomic security goals and objectives of the 

22 United States; 

23 (C) identifies the configuration and per24 formance capabilities of the Northeast Petro25 leum Product Reserves and recommends an ac26 tion plan to achieve the optimal— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1195 IH

1 (i) capacity, location, and composition 

2 of petroleum products in the Northeast Pe3 troleum Product Reserves; and 

4 (ii) storage and distributional capabili5 ties of the Northeast Petroleum Product 

6 Reserves; and 

7 (D) estimates the resources required to at8 tain and maintain the long-term sustainability 

9 and operational effectiveness of the Northeast 

10 Petroleum Product Reserves. 

11 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘North12 east Petroleum Product Reserves’’ means— 

13 (1) the Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve 

14 established under part D of the Energy Policy and 

15 Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6250 et seq.); and 

16 (2) the Northeast Gasoline Supply Reserve. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EX-10.9(b)



 Exhibit 10.9(b) 
 June 1, 2012 
 Cirrus Capital Management, LLC 

700 Louisiana 
 Suite 4260 

Houston,  TX 77002 
 Attention:
Mr. Edward Ondarza 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear
Mr. Ondanza: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below
(the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 CTA Capital LLC 



	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 



	 	•	 	 CMF Cirrus Master Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Commodity Advisors Fund L.P. 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290. 
 Very truly yours, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian Centner
		 	Brian Centner
		 	Chief Financial Officer and Director
	
	CIRRUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
		
	By:            	 	/s/ Edward Ondarza


			
		
	 Print Name:
	 	Edward Ondarza
		
	 BC/sr
Nicor
Inc.


Form
10-Q


Exhibit
32.01





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Nicor Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)           the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  August
      4, 2008
            
            /s/
      RUSS M. STROBELRuss
      M. StrobelChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer