alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1220.123 Referendum.

The term *Referendum* means a referendum, other than referenda defined in § 1220.106 and § 1220.124, to be conducted by the Secretary pursuant to the Act whereby producers shall be given the opportunity to vote to determine whether the continuance of this subpart is favored by a majority of producers voting.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Training and Employment Guidance Letter on WIA Youth Program      

# Training and Employment Guidance Letter on WIA Youth Program

The Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration has released a letter that provides guidance on the use of Workforce Investment Act (WIA) Youth–funded activities and provides program staff with information to improve services and to ensure legal compliance and successful future monitoring.

http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEGL/TEGL31-10ACC.pdf
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certifications pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted).

 

I, R. David Alexander, Jr.,President and Chief Executive Officer of Citi Trends, Inc.,

 

and

 

I, Bruce D. Smith, ChiefFinancial Officer of Citi Trends, Inc., certify that:

 

1. We have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Citi Trends, Inc. for the periodended July 31, 2010;

 

2. Based on our knowledge,this quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3. Based on our knowledge,the financial statements, and other information included in this quarterlyreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report.

 

 
| Date: August 27, 2010 |                                   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                       |                                   |
|                       |                                   |
|                       | /s/ R. David  Alexander, Jr.      |
|                       | R. David  Alexander, Jr.          |
|                       | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                       | (Principal Executive  Officer)         |
|                       |                                   |
| Date: August 27, 2010 |                                   |
|                       |                                   |
|                       |                                   |
|                       | /s/ Bruce D. Smith                     |
|                       | Bruce D. Smith                         |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer                |
|                       | (Principal Financial  Officer)         |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citi Trends, Inc.and will be retained by Citi Trends, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Cigarette Smoking Among U.S. High School Students at Lowest Level in 22 Years      

# Cigarette Smoking Among U.S. High School Students at Lowest Level in 22 Years

According to the results of the 2013 Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), rates of cigarette smoking among high school students have dropped (PDF, 1 page) to the lowest levels since the YRBS began in 1991. By achieving a teen smoking rate of 15.7 percent, the United States has met its national Healthy People 2020 objective of reducing adolescent cigarette use to 16 percent or less.

http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2014/p0612-YRBS.html?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHYRIAA HENDERSON, on behalf of 

herself, and all others similarly 

situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STUDENT AID FUNDS, INC., 

DBA USA Funds,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 17-55373

D.C. No.

3:13-cv-01845-

JLS-BLM

ORDER

Filed May 6, 2019

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, William A. Fletcher,

and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.
2 HENDERSON V. UNITED STUDENT AID FUNDS

ORDER

Judge D.W Nelson voted to deny the petition for 

rehearing and recommended denial of the petition for 

rehearing en banc. Judge W. Fletcher voted to deny the 

petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Judge Bybee 

voted to grant the petition for rehearing and rehearing en 

banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for 

rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote 

on whether to rehear the matter en banc. (Fed.R. App. P. 35.) 

Accordingly, the petition for rehearing and the petition for 

rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for 

rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.

Additionally, Judges D.W. Nelson and W. Fletcher voted 

to amend the opinion as follows. On page 11 of the slip 

opinion, replace the first paragraph with the following 

language:

USA Funds argues it could not have ratified 

the actions of the debt collectors because 

there is no agency relationship between it and 

the debt collectors. Batzel v. Smith, 333 F. 3d 

1018, 1036 (9th Cir. 2003). We disagree. 

First, our decision in Batzel involved 

vicarious liability and agency principles 

under California law, which is distinct from 

principles articulated in the Restatement and 

from federal common law. Second, the 

Restatement § 4.01 cmt. b makes clear that, 

in most jurisdictions, ratification may create 

an agency relationship when none existed 

before if the acts are “done by an actor . . .

who is not an agent but pretends to be.”
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)      

# Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)

The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is the world’s largest, ongoing telephone health survey system, tracking health conditions and risk behaviors in the United States yearly since 1984. Currently, data are collected monthly in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam.

http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/
§ 1.191 Net worth exhibit. ( a ) An applicant, except a qualified tax-exempt organization or cooperative association, must provide with its application a detailed exhibit showing the net worth of the applicant and any affiliates (as defined in § 1.184 of this part) when the proceeding was initiated. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the applicant that provides full disclosure of the applicant's and its affiliates' assets and liabilities and is sufficient to determine whether the applicant qualifies under the standards in this subpart. The adjudicative officer may require an applicant to file additional information to determine its eligibility for an award.
( b ) Ordinarily, the net worth exhibit will be included in the public record of the proceeding. However, an applicant that objects to public disclosure of information in any portion of the exhibit and believes there are legal grounds for withholding it from disclosure may submit that portion of the exhibit directly to the adjudicative officer in a sealed envelope labeled “Confidential Financial Information,” accompanied by a motion to withhold the information from public disclosure. The motion shall describe the information sought to be withheld and explain, in detail, why it falls within one or more of the specific exemptions from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b) ( 1 ) through ( 9 ) . The material in question shall be served on counsel representing the agency against which the applicant seeks an award, but need not be served on any other party to the proceeding. If the adjudicative officer finds that the information should not be withheld from disclosure, it shall be placed in the public record of the proceeding. Otherwise, any request to inspect or copy the exhibit shall be disposed of in accordance with the established procedures of the Department under the Freedom of Information Act (§§ 1.1 through 1.23 of this part).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 26, 2014

No. 04-14-00672-CR

IN RE Mauricio BALDERAS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On September 24, 2014, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The court 

has determined that it lacks jurisdiction to consider relator’s petition. Accordingly, relator’s 

petition is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. The court’s opinion will issue at a 

later date.

It is so ORDERED on September 26th, 2014.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of September, 2014.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011CR0555, styled The State of Texas v. Mauricio Balderas, pending in 

the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Melisa Skinner presiding.
Exhibit 10.2**PROMISSORY NOTE**$3,500,000.00                                                                                                      Effective Date: October 27, 2006     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Siouxland Ethanol, LLC (“Maker”), promises to pay to the order of FarmCredit Service of America, PCA (“FCSA”) at its office at 5015 South 118th St., Omaha,Nebraska 68137, or such other place as FCSA shall direct in writing, the principal sum of ThreeMillion Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000.00) or, if less, the amount outstanding underthis Note for Advances pursuant to the Credit Agreement dated as of May 4,, 2006, by and betweenFCSA and Maker (as it may be amended from time to time in the future, the “Credit Agreement”) andany indebtedness related thereto. This Note is issued and delivered to FCSA pursuant to the CreditAgreement. All capitalized terms used in this Note and not otherwise defined herein shall have thesame meanings as set forth in the Credit Agreement.     The unpaid balance of this Note from time to time outstanding shall bear interest as set forthin the Credit Agreement. Principal and interest shall be payable as provided in the CreditAgreement. The amount of each principal an interest payment shall be determined as provided in theCredit Agreement. This Note has been issued by Maker to FCS/ pursuant to the Credit Agreement andreference is made thereto for specific terms and conditions under which this Note i made and towhich this Note is subject.     Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, Maker agrees that FCSA (including its assignee,“Holder”) shall have all rights and remedies set forth in the Credit Agreement, including withoutlimitation the rights of acceleration set forth in the Credit Agreement. In addition, Holder shallhave the right to recover all costs of collection and enforcement of this Note as provided in theCredit Agreement.     Maker and any endorser, guarantor, surety or assignor hereby waives presentment for payment,demand, protest, notice of protest, and notice of dishonor and nonpayment of this Note, and alldefenses on the ground of delay, suretyship, impairment of collateral, or of extension of time ator after maturity for the payment of this Note.     This Note shall be governed in all respects by the law of the State of Nebraska.Maker:
Exhibit 13.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of CIBT Education Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the twelve months ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis Huang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




February 28, 2011


By:
/s/ Dennis Huang
 Name:
Dennis Huang
 Title:
Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20327

Conference Calendar 

 

JOHNNIE JONES; HARVELLA JONES,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-1621

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Johnnie and Harvella Jones request permission to proceed in

forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s

dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit against the State of

Texas. The Joneses contend that the district court did not lack

subject-matter jurisdiction to consider their § 1983 claims.
No. 97-20327

- 2 -

The Joneses’ § 1983 claims are “inextricably intertwined”

with a state judgment, and the district court was “in essence

being called upon to review the state-court decision.” See

United States v. Shepherd, 23 F.3d 923, 924 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Federal courts lack jurisdiction to engage in appellate review of

state court determinations. District of Columbia Court of

Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476 & 482 (1983); Rooker v.

Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415 (1923).

Furthermore, the Joneses’ civil rights lawsuit against the

State of Texas is barred by the Eleventh Amendment. The Supreme

Court has consistently held that the Eleventh Amendment confers

absolute immunity on an unconsenting state from suits brought in

federal court by the state's own citizens. Puerto Rico Aqueduct

and Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139, 144

(1993). 

The Joneses have failed to show that they will present a

nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d

562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, permission to proceed IFP

is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Mentoring Resources      

# Mentoring Resources

In recognition of National Mentoring Month, the Department of Justice’s National Criminal Justice Reference Service has compiled a list of publications, funding opportunities and initiatives, and other resources related to mentoring. 

https://www.ncjrs.gov/mentoringresources/index.html
#### Aniello Chiaro et al., Respondents, v Ronald J. D’Angelo et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[776 NYS2d 898]

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, etc., the defendants Ronald James D’Angelo and Ronald James D’Angelo & Associates appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ambrosio, J.), dated April 7, 2003, as granted the cross motion of the plaintiffs for an extension of time to serve the summons and complaint on them pursuant CFLR 306-b.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs’ cross motion for an extension of time to serve the summons and complaint on the appellants in the interest of justice pursuant to CFLR 306-b *(see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer,*97 NY2d 95 [2001]; *Earle v Valente,*302 AD2d 353 [2003]; *Seon Uk Lee v Corso,*300 AD2d 385 [2002]). Some of the factors favoring the grant of an extension were that the statute of limitations had expired *(see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, supra; Foote v Ruiz,*289 AD2d 374 [2001]), service which was timely made within the 120-day period was subsequently found to have been defective *(see Earle v Valente, supra; Seon Uk Lee v Corso, supra),*and there was no prejudice to the appellants who had actual notice of the action *(id.).*Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.
#### In re BROWNE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 25, 1906.)

In the matter of Henry H. Brownie.

No opinion. Respondent disbarred. Order filed.
----

|  | (1) | Such      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15 (d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of  Tri-ValleyCorporation. |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November      5, 2008                               |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                |
|   |                                                |
| By:    | /s/F. Lynn Blystone                                 |
|   | F.      Lynn Blystone, Chief Executive Officer CHOB |
|   | Tri-Valley      Corporation                         |

----