alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1207.350 Reports. ( a ) Each designated handler shall maintain a record with respect to each producer for whom he handled potatoes and for potatoes handled which he himself produced. He shall report to the Board at such times and in such manner as it may prescribe by regulations such information as may be necessary for the Board to perform its duties under this part. Such reports may include, but shall not be limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Total quantity of potatoes handled for each producer and for himself, including those which are exempt under the plan;
( 2 ) Total quantity of potatoes handled for each producer and for himself subject to the plan and assessments, and
( 3 ) Name and address of each person from whom he collected an assessment, the amount collected from each person, and the date such collection was made.
( b ) Each importer shall report to the Board at such times and in such manner as it may prescribe such information as may be necessary for the Board to perform its duties under this part.
[37 FR 5008, Mar. 9, 1972, as amended at 56 FR 40230, Aug. 14, 1991]
§ 1205.205 Canvass of ballots. ( a ) *Canvassing procedure.* Canvassing of returned ballots shall take place as soon as possible after the opening of the FSA offices on the fifth day following the close of the referendum period. Such canvassing shall be in the presence of at least one member of the FSA county office for producer ballots or an FSA representative for importer ballots and shall be open to the public. The canvassing and ballots shall be handled in such a manner so that no member of the public may see how any person voted in the referendum. The county office or FSA representative shall supervise the opening of the sealed ballot box, the opening of the envelopes containing the ballots and a determination as to: ( 1 ) The number of eligible voters favoring the Order and where necessary, the amount of cotton represented by them,
( 2 ) The number of eligible voters disapproving the Order and, where necessary, the amount of cotton represented by them.
( 3 ) The number of ballots cast by voters found to be ineligible to vote in the referendum, and
( 4 ) The number of spoiled ballots. The ballots determined to be spoiled or cast by ineligible voters shall not be considered as approving or disapproving the Order, and the persons who cast such ballots shall not be regarded as participating in the referendum.
( b ) *Spoiled ballots.* A ballot shall be considered as a spoiled ballot if: ( 1 ) It is mutilated or marked in such a way that it is not possible to determine with certainty how the ballot was intended to be counted, or
( 2 ) It does not contain the signature of the voter, or the voter's properly witnessed mark.
( c ) *Challenge of ballots.* A producer ballot may be challenged by the member of the FSA county office and the importer ballot may be challenged by the representative of FSA. Before a challenged ballot is either counted or declared invalid, a determination shall be made by the FSA county office or representative of FSA as to the eligibility of the voter to vote in the referendum.
#### § 1005.42 Classification of transfers and diversions.

See § 1000.42.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                             ----------------------


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT



                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 24, 1998


                       NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



New Jersey                   1-640                    13-5267260
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other       (Commission File No.)        (Employer ID No.)
jurisdiction of
incorporation)



16825 Northchase Dr., Suite 1200, Houston, Texas                       77060
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                            (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (281) 423-3300
                                                     --------------



                          Not Applicable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




<PAGE>


Item 5.     Other Events.


      On July 24, 1998, the Registrant  issued the press release attached hereto
as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.




Item 7.     Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and
            Exhibits.


      (c)   Exhibits

            (i)   Exhibit 99.1.     Press Release dated July 24, 1998.



                        *      *      *      *      *




                                    SIGNATURE



      Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                          NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                          (Registrant)



                                          /s/ Dennis G. Newkirk
                                          Dennis G. Newkirk
                                          Vice President & Controller



Dated: July 27, 1998
Exhibit 10.3

Michael Kingman Low  

Manager/Trustee - Small World Traders, LLC.  

  

September 10, 2014  

   

Steele Resources, Inc.  

2705 Garnet Ave Suite 2a  

San Diego, CA 92109  

  

To the Board of Directors of Steele Resources Corp.  

  

Re: Revolving Credit Note dated 4.8.2013  

  

“Small World Traders Secured Note:  On April 8, 2013, the Company issued a revolving line of credit for $200,000 with Small World Traders Secured Note with an interest rate of 8%. This note is secured by the following assets of the Company and a UCC1 was filed for all the Intellectual Property, Current or Previously Filed, Trademarks, 

Formulations, Research and Development Equipment, Manufacturing Equipment, Office 

Equipment, and all interests in Shooting Star Mining Company LLC.  The note is due 

December 31, 2013.  Small World Traders paid $200,327 of expenses on behalf of the Company.  On January 1, 2014, the Note was extended to April 15, 2014 subject to additional consideration.”    

  

A request was made for payment on September 2, 2014.  The Company has made us aware of its inability to meet this demand.  It has also been brought to our attention that the Company lacks the adequate number of shares to affect a conversion should we elect to do so, which is our prerogative.   

  

We hereby agree to an extension of the note until December 31, 2016. 

  

As consideration, the Company agrees to issue shares of Common or Preferred Stock convertible into shares of Common, equal to 75% of the total outstanding shares of the Company, (as of the date of the issuance); and 1,000 shares of Non-Dilutable NonConvertible Preferred shares, with voting rights equal to 75% of the total outstanding shares of the Company, to the lender at the lender’s request, but no later than December 31, 2016.  

  

Sincerely,  

  

  

Michael K. Low, Mgr.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Chavis, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 592]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered December 22, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The reliability of the confidential informant and the basis of his knowledge were established *(see People v Griminger,*71 NY2d 635 [1988]; *People v Hines,*262 AD2d 423 [1999]). Accordingly, the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant and to search his person incident to the arrest.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see *People v Reynoso,*295 AD2d 156 [2002]). H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.
#### 970.1504 Contract pricing.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00408-CR

JERALD HUGHES APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Jerald Hughes appeals his felony conviction for possession of 

four or more, but less than two hundred, grams of a controlled substance with the 

intent to deliver, enhanced by a habitual offender allegation. See Tex. Health & 

Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (d) (West 2010); Tex. Penal Code Ann. 

§ 12.42(d) (West Supp. 2013). Appellant pled guilty pursuant to an open plea, 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

and the trial judge assessed his punishment at twenty-five years’ confinement. 

We affirm.

Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to 

withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel 

avers that, in his professional opinion, the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief 

and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a 

professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable 

grounds for relief. 386 U.S. 738, 744–45, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967); see In re 

Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406–12 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding). 

We gave appellant an opportunity to file a pro se response, but he has not done 

so. Likewise, the State has not filed a brief.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, we 

are obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 

904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–

83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with 

counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in 

the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 

S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 
3

684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 10, 2014
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Financial Aid Toolkit      

# Financial Aid Toolkit

As part of the Administration’s efforts to improve college access and affordability, the Department of Education has created an online “one-stop shop” Financial Aid Toolkit that consolidates financial aid resources and content into a searchable, online database. Aimed at guidance counselors and other advisers, such as staff or volunteers at community-based organizations, the goal of the Toolkit is to make it easy for these individuals to quickly access the information they need to support their students as they help them through the process of selecting and financing their higher education.

http://financialaidtoolkit.ed.gov/tk/
908.1170 Leasing of fuel-efficient vehicles. ( a ) All sedans and station wagons and certain types of light trucks, as specified by GSA, that are acquired by lease for 60 continuous days or more for official use by DOE or its authorized contractors, are subject to the requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA), Public Law 94-163 and of Executive Order 12003 and subsequent implementing regulations.
( b ) Leased vehicles will meet the miles-per-gallon criteria of, and be incorporated in, the approved plan of the fiscal year in which leases are initiated, reviewed, extended, or increased in scope. Vehicle leases will specify the vehicle model type to be provided.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

IVAN DOMNIN
, Appellant,

v.

OKSANA DOMNINA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 2541

[ January 26 , 2023 ]

Appeal of a non

- final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael Davis , Judge; L.T. Case No.

FMCE

- 21015969

.

Andre G. Raiklhelson of Trayber Raikhelson Law Group, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Meaghan K. Marro of Marro Law, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, L EVI NE and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




To VIASYS Healthcare Inc.:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports dated February 6, 2002 (except with respect to the matter
discussed in paragraph 3 to Note 8, as to which the date is March 15, 2002),
included (or incorporated by reference) in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-73152.

                                           ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1


November 6, 2002

Premcor Inc.
1700 East Putnam Avenue
Suite #500
Old Greenwich, CT 06870


We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Premcor Inc. and subsidiaries for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, as indicated in our report dated
November 6, 2002 (which report includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
Company's change in accounting method related to stock-based compensation issued
to employees). Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on
that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, is
incorporated by reference into Registration Statement No. 333-87210 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


Yours truly,



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Decem ber 1 4 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk December 14 , 2016

15 4 808 ( 93 )

SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN SURGICAL

HOSPITAL, LLC, d/b/a SOUTHEAST

MICHIGAN SURGICAL HOSPITAL,

and JAMIE LETKEMANN

,

P laintiff s

- Appell ant s

, SC: 15 4 808

v COA: 3 23425

Wayne CC : 11

- 015300

- NF

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

,

Defendant

- Appellee

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of the Michigan Association for Justice

to participate as amicus curiae and to file a brief in support of the application for leave to

appeal is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on December 7

, 2016, is accepted for

filing

.
#### § 1131.18 Cooperative association.

See § 1000.18.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           The Campaign for Disability Employment      

# The Campaign for Disability Employment

The Campaign for Disability Employment is a collaborative effort to promote positive employment outcomes for people with disabilities by encouraging employers and others to recognize the value and talent they bring to the workplace.

https://www.whatcanyoudocampaign.org/
#### Greenpoint Bank, Appellant, v Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[775 NYS2d 894]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant Twin City Fire Insurance Company is obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiff in an underlying personal injury action entitled *Pittman v Greenpoint Savings Bank,*in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 11601/95, and for damages, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Rivera, J.), dated May 23, 2002, as denied its motion for summary judgment declaring that the defendant Twin City Fire Insurance Company is obli*570gated to indemnify the plaintiff and for damages in the amount of $500,000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The duty to indemnify requires a determination that the insured is liable for a loss covered by the policy *(see Servidone Constr. Corp. v Security Ins. Co. of Hartford,*64 NY2d 419 [1985]; *Lehrer McGovern Bovis v Halsey Constr. Corp.,*254 AD2d 335 [1998]). Generally, the burden is on the insured to establish coverage in the first instance *(see Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v Allstate Ins. Co.,*98 NY2d 208 [2002]). Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that on the record presented, it could not be said as a matter of law that the appellant, Greenpoint Bank, established that the infant plaintiff in the underlying action was injured during the effective dates of the policy issued by the defendant Twin City Fire Insurance Company *(see General Acc. Ins. Co. of Am. v IDBAR Realty Corp.,*229 AD2d 515 [1996]; *Lehrer McGovern Bovis v Halsey Constr. Corp., supra).*Florio, J.P., Townes, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.