alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549








FORM 8-K


CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934








March 14, 2011 (March 14, 2011)


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)








NICOR INC.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)








Illinois
1-7297
36-2855175(State or other jurisdiction
(Commission
(I.R.S. Employerof incorporation)
File Number)
Identification Number)








1844 Ferry Road


Naperville, Illinois 60563-9600


(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)





(630) 305-9500


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):





[  ]           Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[  ]           Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[  ]           Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[  ]           Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Page 2








Item 8.01Other Events.





The Nicor Inc. Amended and Restated Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan was amended and restated (the “Second Amended and Restated Plan”) effective as of March 14, 2011 to, among other things, (i) change the plan administrator and (ii) permit plan participants to reinvest all or only a portion of their dividends, and sell all or a portion of their plan shares through the plan administrator.  A copy of the Second Amended and Restated Plan is filed as Exhibit 99.01 to this report and its terms are incorporated by reference.








Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(d) Exhibits





Exhibit Number              Description of Document





99.01                                Nicor Inc. Second Amended and Restated Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan







Page 3








Signature





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.











Nicor Inc./s/ PAUL C. GRACEY, JR.Date
March 14, 2011

Paul C. Gracey, Jr.Senior Vice President, General

Counsel and Secretary








Page 4





Exhibit Index





Exhibit


Number                           Description of Document





99.01                                Nicor Inc. Second Amended and Restated Automatic Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Human Trafficking Awareness Guide for Student Leaders on College Campuses      

# Resource: Human Trafficking Awareness Guide for Student Leaders on College Campuses

This guide (PDF, 8 pages) spreads awareness of human trafficking among student leaders on college campuses. The guide includes information about: 
                  -  What human trafficking is  
                  -  How to recognize human trafficking on college campuses  
                  -  Key indicators of human trafficking  
                  -  Examples of human trafficking on college campuses  
                  -  Tips for how to spread awareness in your campus community  
                  -  Reporting options if you suspect someone is affected by human trafficking or being exploited   

**Learn more** (PDF, 8 pages).
§ 1205.341 Certification of cotton producer organization. Any cotton producer organization within a cotton-producing State may request the Secretary for certification of eligibility to participate in nominating members and alternate members to represent such State on the Cotton Board. Such eligibility shall be based in addition to other available information upon a factual report submitted by the organization which shall contain information deemed relevant and specified by the Secretary for the making of such determination, including the following: ( a ) Geographic territory within the State covered by the organization's active membership;
( b ) Nature and size of the organization's active membership in the State, proportion of total of such active membership accounted for by farmers, a map showing the cotton-producing counties in such State in which the organization has members, the volume of cotton produced in each such county, the number of cotton producers in each such county, and the size of the organization's active cotton producer membership in each such county;
( c ) The extent to which the cotton producer membership of such organization is represented in setting the organization's policies;
( d ) Evidence of stability and permanency of the organization;
( e ) Sources from which the organization's operating funds are derived;
( f ) Functions of the organization; and
( g ) The organization's ability and willingness to further the aims and objectives of the act.
The primary consideration in determining the eligibility of an organization shall be whether its cotton producer membership consists of a sufficiently large number of cotton producers who produce a relatively significant volume of cotton to reasonably warrant its participation in the nomination of members for the Cotton Board. Any cotton producer organization found eligible by the Secretary under this § 1205.341 will be certified by the Secretary, and the Secretary's determination as to eligibility is final. [31 FR 16758, Dec. 31, 1966. Redesignated and amended at 56 FR 64472, 64474, Dec. 10, 1991]
#### *Gray's adm'r vs. M’Dowell.*

scire facias

Error to the Jessamine Circuit: Wjxuam JL Kelly, Judge.

October 6.

Case 109.

*Parties. Scire facias.*Executors, *fyc.*

D urrer t0 the^Sre *'fad-as,*and judgment *f1'*p aintl '

CaseofJohn?°n’s heiis TS* 8^°260-1: overruled,

in a *scire fa-*a^udgmeut* against the representa-cXe<fdefo£ dant, the suvliving detTmadeTM11^ party, 6 d

3udge Miuls

delivered the Opinion of the Court!

The plaintiff below obtained a judgment in debt, by petition and summons against Hardin Gray and William Conner. Gray departed this life, and plaintiff in the judgment issued a *scire facias*to revive the judgment against both the administrators of Gray and Conner the surviving defendant. The defendants in the *scire facias*demurred, and the court gave judgment against them, to reverse which this writ of error is prosecuted.

The only question made by the assignment of error, and presented to our consideration is, that there was a misjoinder of parties; that the personal representatives of the deceased defendant could not be joined with the survivor, for the purpose of reviving the judgment; and to support this position the case of Johnson’s heirs vs. Deason, 3 Bibb, 260, and 1 Chitt. plead. 37, is cited and relied on.

*it*is true that in the case of Johnson’s heirs vs. Deason, a *scire facias*against the representatives of a deceased defendant, omitting the survivor in a joint j udgment, was sustained- But more recent decisions have made the survivor a necessary party, and have declared a *scire facias*invalid without them; see Mitchell’s heirs vs. Smith’s heirs, 1 Litt. Rep. 243; Holder’s heirs vs. Commonwealth, 3 Marsh. 410.

*502Judgment in such case ought to be several.

*Crittenden,*for plaintiff; *Wickliffe,*for defendant-

The reason assigned why the representatives of one joint defendant cannot be united with the survivor, is, that the judgment must be against one in their representative character, and also against the other in his own right. This difficulty is, however, easily obviated by the doctrine that a joint *scire facias*does not require necessarily, a joint judgment, but the judgment that the plaintifi' have execution may be several, against each, and ought to be so, where one is liable individually and the other in a representative character. Such a judgment has been rendered in the present instance, and there is, therefore, no error therein and it is consequently, affirmed with costs.
Exhibit 4.1


 


 


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

 


The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed
as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:


 





	TEN
    COM — as tenants in common 	UNIF
    GIFT MIN ACT — Custodian
	TEN
    ENT— as tenants by the entireties	(Gust)                     (Minor)
    
	 	under Uniform Gifts
    to Minors
	JT
    TEN — as joint tenants with right of

    survivorship and not as tenants in common	Act______
	 	           (State)




 


 





Additional abbreviations
may also be used though not in the above list.


 




For Value Received,__________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto







 


 





	PLEASE
                            INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE




	 



 


 


 





 



PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OR ASSIGNEE


 


 





 



 





 



 





 



 


_______________________________________ Shares


of the capital stock represented by the within certificate, and
do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


 


__________________________ Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


Dated _____________________________________




 


 





	Signature  	 
	 

         
	 
	 	 
	 	NOTICE:
The signature in this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the Certificate, in every particular,
without alteration or enlargement, or any change whatever.








 


	 	Signature Guaranteed By: _______________________________
	 	(Please have signature guaranteed by a National Bank through its
officer or by a member firm of a major stock exchange.)
#### § 1214.88 OMB control numbers.

The control number assigned to the information collection requirements by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, is OMB control number 0505-0001, and OMB control number 0581-0267 and 0581-0268.
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of JuniperPartners Acquisition Corp. (the‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-QSB for the periodending March  31,  2006 (the‘‘Report’’), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Stuart B. Rekant,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

1.        The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

2.        The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

|        |  |                                                                                              |  |                     |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--------|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|---------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
| By:    |  | /s/Stuart B. Rekant                                                                          |  | Dated: May  12,2006 |
|   |  | Stuart B. RekantChairman of theBoard and Chief Executive Officer(Principal ExecutiveOfficer) |  |                |
|        |

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Indian and Native American Summer Youth Employment Initiatives and the 2009 Recovery Act      

# Indian and Native American Summer Youth Employment Initiatives and the 2009 Recovery Act

This report from the Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration describes the creation of the Indian and Native American Summer Youth Employment Initiative and how grantees used their Recovery Act funds to implement programs.

http://wdr.doleta.gov/research/keyword.cfm?fuseaction=dsp_resultDetails&pub_id=2483&mp=y
Exhibit 32.2

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Altra Industrial Motion, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Wall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

 

 

| Date: November 13, 2007 | By:   | /s/ David Wall                         |
|-------------------------|-------|----------------------------------------|
|                    | Name: | David Wall                             |
|                    | Title | VP Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
#### Jeannine De Capua, an Infant, by Her Parent and Natural Guardian, Hope Schlesing, et al., Respondents, v John Morrissey, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted for the reasons and upon the conditions set forth in the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate a default judgment taken against him in an action arising out of an accident which occurred at defendant’s residence resulting in injuries to the infant plaintiff. On a prior appeal in this action we reversed an earlier order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, vacating a default judgment stating that "defendant’s attempt to establish lack of personal jurisdiction falls far short of the showing necessary” and that "Defendant’s bare statement that he did not receive and was not served with a summons and complaint is insufficient to contest jurisdiction and 'does not rise to the status of excusable default since he does not contend that the method of substituted service was not proper’ ” *(De Capua v Morrissey,*60 AD2d 754). In the moving papers on his renewal motion to vacate before Special Term defendant included uncontradicted proof (in affidavits of the process server and of the defendant which were not before the court on the original application) to the effect that the dwelling house to which the process server had affixed a copy of the summons and complaint and to which he had mailed the summons and complaint (see CPLR 308, subd 4) was not at the time the place where defendant resided. It thus appears that the service was invalid and in personam jurisdiction was never obtained over defendant. Defendant, however, seeks, rather than a dismissal of the action on jurisdictional grounds, a vacatur of the default and leave to interpose an answer on the merits. In his brief and on the argument defendant stated that in the event that the default were opened because of a defect in the service he would waive any defense of the Statute of Limitations that he otherwise might have. In the exercise of our discretion and in the interest of justice, defendant’s renewed motion on the additional papers is deemed to have been made as a motion to renew in this court (see *Weinstein v Kiamesha Concord,*29 AD2d 878). The application should be granted upon the conditions that (1) defendant submit to the court’s jurisdiction by filing his answer within 10 days from the date of the order herein, and (2) that the answer omit any defense of the Statute of Limitations and that any such defense in this action be deemed in all respects waived. In the event of defendant’s failure to comply with these conditions the order is affirmed. (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court — default judgment.) Present — Moule, J. P., Dillon, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32**




**CERTIFICATION**




By
      signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of White
      River Capital, Inc.









Date:
                May 11, 2007/s/
              John M. Eggemeyer, IIIJohn
                M. Eggemeyer, IIIChief
                Executive Officer/s/
              Martin J. SzumskiMartin
                J. SzumskiChief
                Financial Officer
#### Anna M. Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. Thomas Fitzgerald, Appellant.

—-Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant perfect and be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the September Term, beginning September 6, 1967; appeal ordered on the calendar for said Term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before July *94810, 1967; and respondent’s brief must be served and filed before August 15, 1967. Cross motion by appellant insofar as it is to enlarge his time to perfect appeal granted and time enlarged to the September Term. (See motion decided herewith.) Cross motion by appellant insofar as it is to dispense with printing and to reproduce his brief and appendix by Xerography dismissed, as unecessary. Reproduction by Xerography is an approved method by which an appeal may be prosecuted (see CPLR 5529; Rules App. Div. 2d Dept., Part 1, rule I, subd. [3], eff. Mar. 27, 1967). Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Nolan, JJ., concur.