alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. ER I C B YO N H I LL , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 50347 D . C . N o. 8: 00 -c r- 00 09 1-R ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a nue l L . R e a l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i ttt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B e f o r e : O ’S C A N N L A I N , T A L L M A N , a n dB E A , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . E r i c B y on H i l l appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng hi s 18 U .S .C . § 3 6 6 4 ( k ) m o tio n f o ra d ju s tm e n t o f

th e m a n n e ro f

p a y m e n t o f

r e s titu tio n . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. H i l l cont ends thatthe B ureau o f P ri sons’ s ( “ B O P ”) re qu i re m entthathe pay 

# FI LED OC T 27 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 50347 2 r e s t i tut i on i m m e di a t e l ya m ount e d t o a n i m pr ope rde l e ga t i on of r e s pons i bi l i tyf

r om th e d is tr ic t c o u rt to th e B O P , in v io la tio n o f 1 8 U .S .C . § § 3 6 6 4 ( f

) a n d3 5 7 2 . T h is c ont e nt i on l a c ks m e r i t , be c aus e the Judgm e nta nd C om m i tm e ntm a de r e s t i tut i on du e im m e d ia te ly . See 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 7 2 ( d ) ( 1 ) ( “A p e r s o n s e n te n c e dto p a y... re st i tut i on shal l m ake s uch p ay m enti m m edi at el y, un l es s, i n the i nt er es tof j ust i ce , th e c o u rt p r o v id e s f

o rp a y m e n t o n ad a te c e rta in o rin in s ta llm e n ts .” ) . C o n tr a ryto H i l l ’ s c on t ent i on , the j ud gm entdi d n otorder pay m ent s t o b egi n o nl y w hen s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e c om m e nc e d. H i l l al so cont ends thathi s part i cipat i on i n the Inm at e F i nanci al R e s pons i bi l i tyP r ogr a m ( “ I F R P ” ) w a s notvol unt a rybe c aus e the B O P f a l s i f i e d a r e s pons e f

r om the di s tr i c tc ourti ndi c a t i ng tha tr e s t i tut i on pa y m e nt s w e r e due im m e d ia te ly . H ill h a s p r e s e n te dn o e v id e n c e to s up p o rt th is c la im . H i l l f i na l l yc ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d bynotpr ovi di ng f i ndi ngs of f a c t a n dc o n c lu s io n s o f

la w w h e n it d e n ie dth e m o tio n . T h is a r g u m e n t la c k s m e r it b e c au s e f

a c tu a l f in d in g s a r e n o t r e q u ir e dw h e n th is c o u rt’s r e v ie w o f th e m o tio n is n o t d e p e n d e n t o n f

a c tu a l c o n s id e r a tio n s . Se e D ia s v . B a n k o f H a w a ii , 764 F . 2d 1 2 9 2 , 1 2 9 4 - 9 5 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 5 ) .

A FFI R M ED .
Exhibit 32.1



OFFICERS CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of CROWN
FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. (the Company) for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jeffrey M. Hoobler, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|       |  |                                                      
|------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ Jeffrey M. Hoobler                               
|Name:  |  | Jeffrey M. Hoobler                                   
|Title: |  | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim President



Date: July 5, 2005



7
:II TEl I :/lEMA/ 

917-903-1725 support@Aericam.com 

://WEB/ 

www.AeriCam.com AeriCam 

AeriCam X6 Flight Check List 

991 Howard St 

San Francisco, CA 94112 

USA 

<www.AeriCam.com > 

---Observe surrounding rather it's a safe site to fly without endangering others near by. 

Do not fly over people who are not involve and aware of the X6 

---Observe surrounding interference structures such as cell phone tower, high voltage 

power line, office building typically emits enormous amount of different possible 

interference. 

---Determine emergency landing area. 

--Determine a mental flight patch to avoid obstacle and safety for everyone. 

--Find a safe take off and landing area that you are comfortable. 

--Check for any loose screws and tighten all loose screws. 

--Tum on camera and live video station and adj ust your camera settings. 

--Put all radio switch in up position. Then turn on Radio and make sure correct model 

name AeriCam X6 is on the screen. 

----Check Battery voltage of flight battery pack; make sure all cells are close to 4. 2V and 

25.2V total voltage. 

--Strap two batteries onto airframe and connect the connectors. 

--Wait for slow yellow flashing light for Attitude flight mode, recommended flight mode 

for Aerial Photography work. For GPS flight mode, wait for all red flashes stop and only 

purple light flashing to be ready to take in GPS mode. 

--Check Radio Range by Power down mode. Walk Approximate 120Ft, 40 meters and 

arm and disarm motor quickly to check radio signal within range. If motor arm and 

disarm as expected, flight proceed. If radio checks fail, consider moving to different 

location, or plan shorter flight path. 

--Double check flight path is clear before taking off. 

--Double check the correct fl ight mode, slow yellow fleshing light, attitude mode is 

recommended. 

--Time your flight. (Test your flight time with your payload at low attitude) 

--Take off and perform planned flight path. 

--Keep track of timer, keep an eye on low battery lights. Quick continues yellow flashes 

means need to land swiftly. Red flashes means prepare for quick landing. Also listen to 

low battery alarm is another indication battery is low. 

--Make sure pre-determined landing area is clear and prepare to land.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**765 KA 10-00659**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RODNEY L. SCALES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MATTHEW DUNHAM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John J. Connell, J.), rendered March 19, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.15 [4]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution because he did not move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground ( see People v Lopez , 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, “no factual colloquy was required inasmuch as defendant pleaded guilty to a lesser included offense” ( People v Thelbert , 17 AD3d 1049, 1049; see People v Thousand , 96 AD3d 1439, 1440, lv denied 19 NY3d 1002).
Defendant further contends that County Court should have afforded him the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea because his postplea assertions of innocence cast doubt on whether the plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. Defendant did not move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment on that ground and, thus, that contention is not preserved for our review ( see People v Eagle , 105 AD3d 1453, 1453-1454, lv denied 21 NY3d 1073; cf. People v Nelson , 66 AD3d 1430, 1430, lv denied 14 NY3d 772). In any event, that contention lacks merit. “ ‘[A] defendant is not entitled to withdraw his guilty plea based on a subsequent unsupported claim of innocence, where the guilty plea was voluntarily made with the advice of counsel following an appraisal of all the relevant factors’ ” ( People v Alexander , 97 NY2d 482, 485; see People v Gleen , 73 AD3d 1443, 1444,**-2- 765 KA 10-00659** 

lv denied 15 NY3d 773).

Entered: June 20, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Study Finds Genetic Clue to Menopause-Like Condition in Young Women      

# Study Finds Genetic Clue to Menopause-Like Condition in Young Women

New research from NIH contributes to the understanding of primary ovarian insufficiency (POI), a disorder that causes a woman’s ovaries to stop working before she is 40 years old, sometimes as early as in her teens. POI can affect fertility and puts women at high-risk the onset of osteoporosis and heart disease.

http://www.nih.gov/news/health/dec2014/nichd-17a.htm?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
Order entered May 21 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 15

- 00633

- CV

IN RE RICKEY WAYNE TOLBERT JR., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JD

- 42441

- W



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE
**Exhibit
      32**




**CERTIFICATION**




By
      signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of White
      River Capital, Inc.




Date:
      November 13, 2006.




/s/
John
              M. Eggemeyer, IIIJohn
                M. Eggemeyer, IIIChief
                Executive Officer/s/
Martin
              J. SzumskiMartin
                J. SzumskiChief
                Financial Officer
#### 970.5231-4 Preexisting conditions.

As prescribed in 970.3170, insert the following clause:

# Preexisting Conditions (DEC 2000)

(a) The Department of Energy agrees to reimburse the Contractor, and the Contractor shall not be held responsible, for any liability (including without limitation, a claim involving strict or absolute liability and any civil fine or penalty), expense, or remediation cost, but limited to those of a civil nature, which may be incurred by, imposed on, or asserted against the Contractor arising out of any condition, act, or failure to act which occurred before the Contractor assumed responsibility on [Insert date contract began]. To the extent the acts or omissions of the Contractor cause or add to any liability, expense or remediation cost resulting from conditions in existence prior to [Insert date contract began], the Contractor shall be responsible in accordance with the terms and conditions of this contract.

(b) The obligations of the Department of Energy under this clause are subject to the availability of appropriated funds.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I* (DEC 2000). As prescribed in 970.3170 (a), in contracts with incumbent management and operating contractors, substitute the following for paragraph (a) of the basic clause:

(a) Any liability, obligation, loss, damage, claim (including without limitation, a claim involving strict or absolute liability), action, suit, civil fine or penalty, cost, expense or disbursement, which may be incurred or imposed, or asserted by any party and arising out of any condition, act or failure to act which occurred before [Insert date this clause was included in contract], in conjunction with the management and operation of [Insert name of facility], shall be deemed incurred under Contract No. [Insert number of prior contract].

*Alternate II* (DEC 2000). As prescribed in 970.3170 (b), add the following paragraph (c) to the basic clause in contracts with management and operating contractors not previously working at that particular site or facility:

(c) The Contractor has the duty to inspect the facilities and sites and timely identify to the Contracting Officer those conditions which it believes could give rise to a liability, obligation, loss, damage, penalty, fine, claim, action, suit, cost, expense, or disbursement or areas of actual or potential noncompliance with the terms and conditions of this contract or applicable law or regulation. The Contractor has the responsibility to take corrective action, as directed by the Contracting Officer and as required elsewhere in this contract.

(End of clause)

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36375, 36378, 36380, July 22, 2009]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           HHS Launches Innovative Digital Storytelling Project to Support Federal HIV Response      

# HHS Launches Innovative Digital Storytelling Project to Support Federal HIV Response

Developed by AIDS.gov with input from federal agencies, health care professionals, persons living with HIV, and community-based HIV organizations, Positive Spin is a digital educational tool that features the personal stories of five HIV-positive, gay black men who have successfully navigated the HIV care continuum. The goal of the project is to promote digital storytelling as a tool for HIV outreach, and to counter the misconceptions, stigma, and discrimination that create significant barriers to HIV testing and treatment. 

http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2015pres/03/20150325a.html?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Report-and-Resources
4.1200 Scope. This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for requiring submission and maintenance of representations and certifications via the System for Award Management (SAM) to— ( a ) Eliminate the administrative burden for contractors of submitting the same information to various contracting offices;
( b ) Establish a common source for this information to procurement offices across the Government; and
( c ) Incorporate by reference the contractor's representations and certifications in the awarded contract.
[69 FR 76345, Dec. 20, 2004, as amended at 72 FR 36854, July 5, 2007; 78 FR 37678, June 21, 2013; 79 FR 70341, Nov. 25, 2014; 84 FR 19841, May 6, 2019]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 106 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 106

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that amounts paid 
    for an abortion are not taken into account for purposes of the 
                    deduction for medical expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that amounts paid 
    for an abortion are not taken into account for purposes of the 
                    deduction for medical expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. AMOUNTS PAID FOR ABORTION NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING 
              DEDUCTION FOR MEDICAL EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Amounts Paid for Abortion Not Taken Into Account.--An amount 
paid during the taxable year for an abortion shall not be taken into 
account under subsection (a).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### 9901.312 Minutes.

The Executive Secretary of the Board shall be responsible for keeping accurate minutes of Board meetings and maintaining Board files.
#### Leila Green, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Elijah Green, an Infant, Respondent, v New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 52]

*288Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered October 19, 2003, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained by infant plaintiff in a slip and fall on a staircase in residential premises owned and managed by defendant, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As plaintiff adduces no evidence showing how long the stairs had been wet and cluttered with paper debris, or that wetness and paper debris were recurring conditions routinely left unaddressed by defendant, no issues of fact are raised as to whether defendant had notice of the wetness and paper debris that allegedly caused plaintiff to slip and fall *(see Allen v Brooks,*246 AD2d 438 [1998]; *Chaney v Abyssinian Baptist Church,*246 AD2d 372 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 805 [1998]). Nevertheless, defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied on the ground that an issue of fact does exist as to whether inadequate lighting in the staircase, in violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 27-2039 (b) and Multiple Dwelling Law § 37, contributed to the accident. On that issue, the burden is not on plaintiff to show that defendant had notice, but on defendant to show that it lacked notice that the lights in the staircase were out *(see Santiago v New York City Hous. Auth.,*268 AD2d 203 [2000]; *Mermelstein v 417 Riverside Dr.,*25 AD2d 522, 523 [1966]). Assuming a prima facie showing of lack of notice was made out by defendant’s evidence that its caretakers were required to replace burned-out bulbs as part of their regular maintenance of the staircases and that it had received no complaints of burned-out bulbs *(see Rivas v 525 Bldg. Co.,*306 AD2d 337, 339 [2003]), plaintiffs testimony that the lights were out simultaneously on three floors permits inferences that the lights had been out for an extended period of time and that defendant’s routine maintenance practices were not being followed. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Lerner, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.