alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Wayne Kowalski 7118 Positano Hill Ave 702-308-6574 wayne@photographybywayne.com October29, 2015 Petition for Section 333 Exemption Iherebyformally request FAAauthorization for Photography By Wayne (hereafter "PETITIONER") to operate a UAS for civil (non-governmental) purposes otherthan for recreation or hobby. PETITIONER requests to be exempted from 14 CFR 

### §§61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a}, 91.119(c), 91.121,91.151(a)(1},91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extentnecessaryto allow PETITIONER to operate a UAS tcfperforffi''' , · aerial data collection, including but not limited to aerial imaging. PETITIONER requeststhis exemption for its use of UAS both within and withoutthe United States. PETITIONER frequentlytravels abroad for photographic endeavors and seeksto use UAS in accordance with all laws offoreign and domesticgovernmental authorities. PETITIONER requeststhis permission to pursue its use of UAS models including OJI Phantom 1, OJI Phantom 2, OJI Phantom 3, OJI Inspire ,30 Robotics IRIS+, 30 Robotics Solo, 30 Robotics X8+, and 30 Robotics X8- M, or other similar commercially-available and widely-available UAS models. PETITIONER will conduct its use of UAS in a mannerwhich will minimize risk to the NAS, other persons, and property. The following procedures will befollowed: (1} UAS will be given a pre-flight inspection before each flightto examine air-worthiness, (2) UAS will not be materially altered from commercial specifications exceptfor battery, prop, and battery alterations, (3) UAS will not beflown over people, (4) UAS will always be flown within line ofsightto operator(s) pursuantto Section 333(b)(1}, (5) UAS will never reach altitudes over exceeding those allowed, (6) UAS will never reach speeds exceeding 50 mph, (7) operatorwill perform a pre-flightvisual inspection ofthe NAS to determine nearbydangers such as low-flying manned or unmanned aerial vehicles, power lines, and buildings, (8) UAS will be checked for flight stability, proper connection to remote control, and proper performance at avery low altitude before reaching the NAS, and (9) non-participating spectators will be asked to stay asafe distance awayfrom the flight path ofthe UAS and its landing location. PETITIONER is an experienced UAS operatorwith more than one year of experience. This petition will benefitthe public interest. PETITIONER will provide imagerywhich is nototherwise possible to be captured without the use of a UAV, which will assist companies to which the images may be sold, will enhance the public understanding of nature photographed bythe VAS, and PETITIONER will be ableto provide UAS safety information to those with whom he or she comes in contact. Please grantthe requested exemption under Section 333.

Wayne Kowalski Photography ByWayne
##### 



Exhibit 31-7
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
 AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PECO Energy Company;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: October 26, 2005
    /s/ J. Barry MitchellSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 8.1**

 

**List of certain subsidiaries of Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S.A.B. de C.V.**

 
| **Name of Subsidiary**                     | ** ** | **Jurisdiction** | ** ** | **Ownership Interest** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------|------------|-----------------------------|------------|
| Aeropuerto de Cancún,   S.A. de C.V.            |       | Mexico           |       | 100                         | %          |
| Aeropuerto de Cozumel,   S.A. de C.V. (1)            |       | Mexico           |       | 100                         | %          |
| Aeropuerto de Mérida,   S.A. de C.V.            |       | Mexico           |       | 100                         | %          |
| Aeropuerto de   Huatulco, S.A. de C.V. (2)           |       | Mexico           |       | 100                         | %          |
| Aeropuerto de Oaxaca,   S.A. de C.V.                 |       | Mexico           |       | 100                         | %          |
| Aeropuerto de   Veracruz, S.A. de C.V. (3)           |       | Mexico           |       | 100                         | %          |
| Aeropuerto de   Villahermosa, S.A. de C.V.           |       | Mexico           |       | 100                         | %          |
| Aeropuerto de   Tapachula, S.A. de C.V. (4)          |       | Mexico           |       | 100                         | %          |
| Aeropuerto de   Minatitlán, S.A. de C.V. (5)    |       | Mexico           |       | 100                         | %          |
| Servicios   Aeroportuarios del Sureste, S.A. de C.V. |       | Mexico           |       | 100                         | %          |
| RH Asur, S.A. de   C.V.                              |       | Mexico           |       | 100                         | %          |

 

----

(1) As of December 2013, Aeropuerto de Cancún, S.A. de C.V., has an 18.1% equity participation in this airport. 

(2) As of December 2013, Aeropuerto de Cancún, S.A. de C.V., has a 21.6% equity participation in this airport.

(3) As of December 2013, Aeropuerto de Cancún, S.A. de C.V., has an 8.4% equity participation in this airport.

(4) As of December 2013, Aeropuerto de Cancún, S.A. de C.V., has a 30.0% equity participation in this airport.

(5) As of December 2013, Aeropuerto de Cancún, S.A. de C.V., has a 23.4% equity participation in this airport.

 

----
§ 1126.30 Reports of receipts and utilization. Each handler shall report monthly so that the market administrator's office receives the report on or before the 8th day after the end of the month, in the detail and on prescribed forms, as follows: ( a ) Each pool plant operator shall report for each of its operations the following information: ( 1 ) Product pounds, pounds of butterfat, pounds of protein, pounds of nonfat solids other than protein (other solids), and the value of the somatic cell adjustment pursuant to § 1000.50(p) contained in or represented by: ( i ) Receipts of producer milk, including producer milk diverted by the reporting handler, from sources other than handlers described in § 1000.9(c); and
( ii ) Receipts of milk from handlers described in § 1000.9(c);
( 2 ) Product pounds and pounds of butterfat contained in: ( i ) Receipts of fluid milk products and bulk fluid cream products from other pool plants;
( ii ) Receipts of other source milk; and
( iii ) Inventories at the beginning and end of the month of fluid milk products and bulk fluid cream products;
( 3 ) The utilization or disposition of all milk and milk products required to be reported pursuant to this paragraph; and
( 4 ) Such other information with respect to the receipts and utilization of skim milk, butterfat, milk protein, other nonfat solids, and somatic cell information, as the market administrator may prescribe.
( b ) Each handler operating a partially regulated distributing plant shall report with respect to such plant in the same manner as prescribed for reports required by paragraph (a) of this section. Receipts of milk that would have been producer milk if the plant had been fully regulated shall be reported in lieu of producer milk. The report shall show also the quantity of any reconstituted skim milk in route disposition in the marketing area.
( c ) Each handler described in § 1000.9(c) shall report: ( 1 ) The product pounds, pounds of butterfat, pounds of protein, pounds of solids-not-fat other than protein (other solids), and the value of the somatic cell adjustment pursuant to § 1000.50(p), contained in receipts of milk from producers; and
( 2 ) The utilization or disposition of such receipts.
( d ) Each handler not specified in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section shall report with respect to its receipts and utilization of milk and milk products in such manner as the market administrator may prescribe.
#### Michelle Millar, Appellant, v Town of Oyster Bay et al., Respondents.

[775 NYS2d 893]

*589In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), entered June 19, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident (see *Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). The unaffirmed report of the plaintiffs physician dated February 11, 2002, submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. Moreover, the affirmed report of the same physician did not identify the objective tests, if any, he used to establish limitations in the plaintiffs range of motion.

The plaintiff failed to submit any competent objective medical evidence to support a claim that she was unable to perform substantially all of her daily activities for not less than 90 of the first 180 days after the subject accident as a result of the subject accident *(see Sainte-Aime v Ho,*274 AD2d 569 [2000]; *Jackson v New York City Tr. Auth.,*273 AD2d 200 [2000]; *Greene v Miranda,*272 AD2d 441 [2000]; *Arshad v Gomer,*268 AD2d 450 [2000]; *Bennett v Reed,*263 AD2d 800 [1999]; *DiNunzio v County of Suffolk,*256 AD2d 498, 499 [1998]).

Accordingly, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.5

              Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18 United States Code
              -----------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of PECO Energy Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2002, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of PECO Energy Company.



Date:  October 31, 2002                    /s/ Kenneth G. Lawrence
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Kenneth G. Lawrence
                                           President
                                           PECO Energy Company
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of the Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Warner Music Group Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael D. Fleisher, Chief Financial Officer of Warner Music Group Corp., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: August 3, 2006
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Systems Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, AJ Vesak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of November, 2006.

BY:
/s/ AJ VESAK                        Alexander Vesak, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**
#### § 1214.104 Subagents.

The referendum agent may appoint any individual or individuals necessary or desirable to assist the agent in performing such agent's functions of this subpart. Each individual so appointed may be authorized by the agent to perform any or all of the functions which, in the absence of such appointment, shall be performed by the agent.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# These Online High Schools Didn’t Make the Grade

FTC has charged companies known as “diploma mills” for selling fake high school diplomas that they promise can be used to apply for college and employment. Users may be dealing with a diploma mill if the company states that they charge a flat fee; can provide a diploma in months, weeks, or days; require little or no coursework; or can offer a degree solely for “work or life experience.” 

http://www.onguardonline.gov/blog/these-online-high-schools-didnt-make-grade?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
#### § 1000.93 OMB control number assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The information collection requirements contained in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of Title 44 U.S.C. chapter 35 and have been assigned OMB control number 0581-0032.
#### § 1212.20 Promotion.

“Promotion” means any action, including paid advertising and public relations that presents a favorable image for honey or honey products to the public and food industry with the intent of improving the perception and competitive position of honey and stimulating sales of honey or honey products.
#### § 1030.2 Upper Midwest marketing area.

The marketing area means all territory within the bounds of the following states and political subdivisions, including all piers, docks, and wharves connected therewith and all craft moored thereat, and all territory occupied by government (municipal, State, or Federal) reservations, installations, institutions, or other similar establishments if any part thereof is within any of the listed states or political subdivisions:

# Illinois Counties

Boone, Carroll, Cook, De Kalb, Du Page, Jo Daviess, Kane, Kendall, Lake, Lee, McHenry, Ogle, Stephenson, Will, and Winnebago.

# Iowa Counties

Howard, Kossuth, Mitchell, Winnebago, Winneshiek, and Worth.

# Michigan Counties

Delta, Dickinson, Gogebic, Iron, Menominee, and Ontonagon.

# Minnesota

All counties except Lincoln, Nobles, Pipestone, and Rock.

# North Dakota Counties

Barnes, Cass, Cavalier, Dickey, Grand Forks, Griggs, La Moure, Nelson, Pembina, Ramsey, Ransom, Richland, Sargent, Steele, Traill, and Walsh.

# South Dakota Counties

Brown, Day, Edmunds, Grant, Marshall, McPherson, Roberts, and Walworth.

# Wisconsin Counties

All counties except Crawford and Grant.
#### § 1051.5 Distributing plant.

See § 1000.5.
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stuart C. Clifford, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1, for the period ended May 5, 2018 of Citi Trends, Inc.; and

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: March 15, 2019                                |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                |   |
| /s/ Stuart C. Clifford                              |   |
| Stuart   C. Clifford                                |   |
| Senior   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| (Principal   Financial and Accounting Officer)      |   |

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ricardo Romano v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00538-CR

Trial court case number: 2167075

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 6 of Harris County

Appellant’s “Motion for Rehearing En Banc” is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Richard Hightower

Acting for the En Banc Court

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, 

Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.

Date: September 9, 2021
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Fact Sheet: Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act School Meals Implementation      

# Fact Sheet: Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act School Meals Implementation

The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act was passed in 2010 to help ensure that all children in America have access to the nutrition they need. A goal of the Act is to reduce the childhood obesity epidemic and related health risks by helping schools provide balanced meals to students. This fact sheet provides an overview of the results of the school meals provision of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act and recent actions that support school nutrition programs. 

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentid=2014/05/0098.xml&utm_source=FindYouthInfo&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources