alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1205.402 Determination of Cotton Board membership. ( a ) In determining whether any cotton-producing state is entitled to be represented by more than one member of the Cotton Board as provided in § 1205.322, average annual production of Upland cotton in terms of 480-pound net weight bales for the five most recent marketing years will be used as the criteria for determination of such additional members.
( b ) In determining whether importers of cotton and cotton-containing products are entitled to be represented by more than a minimum of two members on the Cotton Board as provided in § 1205.322, the average annual volume of imported cotton and the cotton content of imported products on which assessments have been collected will be used as the criteria for determination of such additional members. This volume of cotton will be expressed in terms of 480-pound net weight bales for the five most recent calendar years. The initial importer representation on the Board shall consist of four importer representatives.
( c ) All members appointed from a state will be entitled to serve a full three-year term even though it is determined in a subsequent year that a state should have fewer additional members by using the average production of the five most recent marketing years as specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) All members appointed to represent importers will be entitled to serve a full three-year term even though it is determined in a subsequent year that importers should be represented by fewer additional members by using the average volume of imports of cotton and the cotton content of products on which assessments have been collected as specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( e ) Each year the Director shall: ( 1 ) Based on the average annual production of Upland cotton in terms of 480-pound net weight bales for the five most recent marketing years, notify all certified cotton producer organizations in each cotton-producing state of the number of vacancies to be filled by cotton producers on the Cotton Board; and
( 2 ) Based on the average annual volume of imports of cotton and the cotton content of cotton-containing products on which assessments as provided for in § 1205.335 have been collected in terms of 480-pound net weight bales for the five most recent calendar years, notify all certified cotton importer organizations of the number of vacancies to be filled by cotton importers on the Cotton Board.
[56 FR 65980, Dec. 20, 1991]
|   | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-101794) pertaining to the Syngenta Deferred Share Plan (Share Awards) and Syngenta AG Executive Stock Option Plan 10, |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-117497) pertaining to the Syngenta Deferred Share Plan, |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-124836) pertaining to the Syngenta Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-130440) pertaining to the Syngenta Share Plan for Non-Executive Directors, and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (5) | Registration Statement (Form F-3ASR No. 333-178015) pertaining to the Syngenta AG prospectus for the registration of debt securities offered by Syngenta Finance N. V .; |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 1007.71 Payments to the producer-settlement fund. Each handler shall make a payment to the producer-settlement fund in a manner that provides receipt of the funds by the market administrator no later than the 12th day after the end of the month (except as provided in § 1000.90). Payment shall be the amount, if any, by which the amount specified in paragraph (a) of this section exceeds the amount specified in paragraph (b) of this section: ( a ) The total value of milk of the handler for the month as determined pursuant to § 1007.60; and
( b ) The sum of the value at the uniform prices for skim milk and butterfat, adjusted for plant location, of the handler's receipts of producer milk; and the value at the uniform price, as adjusted pursuant to § 1007.75, applicable at the location of the plant from which received of other source milk for which a value is computed pursuant to § 1007.60(e).
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Fitness.gov      

# Fitness.gov

This website is the health, physical activity, fitness and sports information website of the President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. You can find out about the Council and its work, view publications, and link to the resources of other government agencies as well as to health and fitness organizations

http://www.fitness.gov
#### § 1126.4 Plant.

See § 1000.4.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDRANIK KHANJARYAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-72939

Agency No. A079-578-025

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 23, 2014** 

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Andranik Khanjaryan, a native of the former U.S.S.R. and a citizen of

Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 

FILED

OCT 03 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

reopen, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny

the petition for review. 

The agency did not abuse its discretion by denying Khanjaryan’s motion to

reopen where Khanjaryan did not offer any grounds for rescission of his in absentia

order of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 06-72939
FILE COPY



# /l-tz

# -2¿/-h/
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF

### TEXAS

NO. 14-0377 

## crrY oF BRowNsvILLE,

# TEXAS i v.s MARC' L.NG'RTA AND

# THE i tameron county' BROWNSVILLE FIRE

# FIGHTERS' 

# ì ,3rh Districr. 

# ASSocTATIoN s s


### January 30, 2015 Petitioner's 

### petition 

### for ¡eview, 

### filed herein 

### in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied. 

### May 1,2015 Petitioner's 

### motion 

### for rehearing

## of petition

### for review, 

### filed herein

## in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



# ********** I' BLAKE

### A' IIAWTHORNE, 

### clerk of the supreme 

### court of rexas,

# do hereby certif,i that the above and attached 

### is a

### true and correct copy 

### of the o¡ders 

### of the Supreme 

### court 

### of Texas 

### in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear 

### of record 

### in the minutes 

### of said Court under the date shown. 

### It is further ordered rhat petitioner, 

## cITy oF BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS, pay 

### all costs incuned onthis petition. WITNESS my hand and seal 

### of the supreme 

### court of rexas, atthe

### city of Austin, this the 4th day of May, 2015. 

# B\*i-..--

# \

.

# Fl,-,r-+-.,<__ Blake

### A. Hawthome, Clerk By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 18, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 18, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0065. TPG MANDALAY, LLC v. THE HENRY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, BY AND THROUGH JUNE WOOD et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 17CV1482
EXHIBIT 10.14

                                    AGREEMENT

         THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 3rd day of December, 2005 by and
between DAVID AUBEL (hereinafter referred to as "AUBEL") and VIDEO WITHOUT
BOUNDARIES, INC., a Florida Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "VIDEO");

         WHEREAS, DAVID AUBEL has a substantial outstanding indebtedness from
VIDEO;

         WHEREAS, AUBEL has the right to convert stock against the outstanding
debt at one ($.01) cent per share based upon monies due and owing;

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to limit the ability of AUBEL to convert his
outstanding debt to future stock and to modify the value of conversion in the
third and fourth quarter on shares already converted in 2005 as well as modify
the terms and condition of conversion subsequent hereto;

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and Ten ($10.00)
Dollars in hand paid by each party hereto unto the other, and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt, sufficiency and adequacy of which is hereby
jointly and severally acknowledged, and the covenants, promises,
representations, guarantees and the agreements herein contained;

         IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the Parties hereto as follows:

         1. The above recitals are true and correct.

         2. For any and all distributions or conversions of shares of stock in
2005, the conversion rate shall be as follows:

<PAGE>

         A.       For the first and second quarter of 2005, the amount
                  attributable to the conversion rate shall be at one ($.01)
                  cent per share;

         B.       For third quarter, conversion of debt to shares of stock shall
                  be at twenty (20%) percent of the then closing price on the
                  date of conversion;

         C.       For the fourth quarter of 2005 and any subsequent time
                  therein, any conversion shall be at forty (40%) percent of the
                  then closing price of the stock on the date of conversion;

         D.       Additionally, AUBEL, in the future and from this day forward,
                  shall be limited to convert 3% of the outstanding debt to
                  stock in any one quarter from the date of this Agreement.

         3. This Agreement is entered into freely and there are no oral
representations made and the parties are relying only on the written
representations contained herein in executing this Agreement. Signed this 3rd
day of December, 2005.

                                                  VIDEO WITHOUT BOUNDARIES, INC
         /s/ David Aubel                          /s/ Jeffrey Harrell
         --------------------                     -------------------------
         DAVID AUBEL                              by: Jeffrey Harrell
                                                      As President & CEO

                                       2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony Carestia, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph De Domenico, Appellant.

Appeal by defendants Anthony Carestía and Joseph De Domenico from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 30, 1964 on their pleas of guilty, convicting each of them of violation of sections 974 and 975 of the Penal Law (policy), and imposing sentence. As to each defendant, judgment affirmed. No opinion. The determination of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County, made Sepetmber 9, 1963, which denied defendants’ motion “ controverting the search warrant ” and to suppress evidence obtained thereunder, was reviewed on the appeal from said judgment. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 118 

To prohibit agencies from issuing vaccine passports, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committee on 

House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit agencies from issuing vaccine passports, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Vaccine Passports 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AGENCIES ISSUING VACCINE 

7 PASSPORTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—An agency may not issue a vac9 cine passport, vaccine pass, or other standardized docuVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:16 Jan 14, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H118.IH H118

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 118 IH

1 mentation for the purpose of certifying the COVID–19 

2 vaccination status of a citizen of the United States to a 

3 third party, or otherwise publish or share any COVID– 

4 19 vaccination record of a citizen of the United States, 

5 or similar health information. 

6 (b) AGENCY DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

7 ‘‘agency’’ has the meaning given that term in section 551 

8 of title 5, United States Code. 

9 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING PROOF OF COVID–19 

10 VACCINATION FOR FEDERAL ACCESS. 

11 Proof of COVID–19 vaccination shall not be deemed 

12 a requirement for access to Federal property or Federal 

13 services, or for access to congressional grounds or services. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### § 1207.308 Handler.

*Handler* means any person (except a common or contract carrier of potatoes owned by another person) who handles potatoes, including a producer who handles potatoes of his own production.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsBrochures Prepared by NRC Staff

# Radiation Protection and the NRC (NUREG/BR-0322, Revision 1)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Introduction

Download complete document
        - NUREG/BR-0322, Revision 1 (PDF - 556 KB)

## Publication Information

**Date Published:**June 2010 

Office of Public Affairs Washington, DC 20555-0001 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

## Introduction

***Radiation is all around us.*** It is naturally present in our environment and has been since before the birth of this planet. Radiation occurs in nature, but it can also be produced artificially, as in medical x-rays and microwaves for cooking. Radiation can be either beneficial or harmful, depending on its use and control. Therefore, regulation of certain radioactive sources is necessary so that people are protected from unnecessary or excessive exposures.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
9904.416-40 Fundamental requirement. ( a ) The amount of insurance cost to be assigned to a cost accounting period is the projected average loss for that period plus insurance administration expenses in that period.
( b ) The allocation of insurance costs to cost objectives shall be based on the beneficial or casual relationship between the insurance costs and the benefiting or causing cost objectives.
First Border 2012 Binational Site Stabilization Action 

At Abandoned Secondary Lead Smelter in Tijuana, Mexico

Introduction: The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), SEMARNAT (Mexican Secretary 

for Environment & Natural Resources), and State of Baja California partnered to complete a cleanup 

demonstration at the Metales y Derivados (MyD) site, an 

abandoned secondary lead smelter and battery recycling 

facility in Tijuana, Mexico. The cleanup demonstration 

was performed to meet an institutional capacity building 

objective under the Border 2012 Plan (Goal 3 Reduce 

Land Contamination). 

Cleanup objectives: In June 2004, as part of a 

Border 2012 coordinating event in Tijuana, Mexico, 

Administrator Leavitt of the US Environmental P

Agency (EPA) and Minster Cardenas of the Mexican 

Ministry of Environment (SEMARNAT) met to affirm

their commitment to protect their shared border. SEMARNAT and other government agencies also 

signed a declaration of cooperation and commitment of funding and institutional resources leadin

the remediation of the MyD site. 

rotection

g to

Following the signing ceremony in Tijuana, EPA and SEMARNAT began the site stabilization action 

designed to remove wastes in drums and sacks 

posing the highest risks, consolidating wastes to a 

more confined area, and strengthening site access

restrictions through fencing, signage and outreach. 

Health and safety practices to protect workers and 

the community were established as part of the 

cleanup plan. 

Accomplishments: In June 2004, EPA and 

SEMARNAT contracted a specialized cleanup 

contractor. By September 2004, the contractor 

removed and transported 300 tons of hazardous waste to a facility in the United States. SEMARNAT 

also signed a declaration forming the work for the cleanup and risk reduction at the MyD site. 

The work group is meeting regularly to address the four phases of the remediation process which 

include: risk reduction, site characterization and risk assessment, alternative analysis and selection, 

and implementation of selected remedy. Plans are in 

place to remove an additional 2000 tons in 2005 and to 

evaluate long-term cleanup remedies. 

Additional Information: For more details on the 

cleanup refer to Metales Final Summary Report 

September 2004 or contact the Border 2012 

California/Baja California Waste and Enforcement 

Task Force (see web page at epa.gov/usmexicoborder) 

Border 2012 California/Baja California Waste and Enforcement Task Force December 2004
Third District.

#### Lillie B. Turney, executrix of the will of Sarah J. Tolson, deceased, defendant in error, v. Richard Tolson, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 8,500.

Opinion filed April 14, 1931.

S. S. Clapper and Geo. B. Rhoads, for plaintiff in error.

J. E. Dazey and J. J. Baker, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Eldredge

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### 871.201 General.
EXHIBIT 15










November 13, 2003






Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated November 13, 2003 on our review of
consolidated interim financial information of FirstEnergy Corp. as of September
30, 2003 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 and
2002, included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003, is incorporated by reference in its Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-48587, 333-102074 and 333-103865) and Form S-8
(Nos. 333-48651, 333-56094, 333-58279, 333-67798, 333-72764, 333-72766,
333-72768, 333-75985, 333-81183, 333-89356 and 333-101472).

Very truly yours,




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



                              158

<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15












November 13, 2003






Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated November 13, 2003 on our review of
consolidated interim financial information of Ohio Edison Company as of
September 30, 2003 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,
2003 and 2002, included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003, is incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-49413, 33-51139, 333-01489 and
333-05277).

Very truly yours,




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




                                   159
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 15











November 13, 2003







Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated November 13, 2003 on our review of interim
financial information of Pennsylvania Power Company as of September 30, 2003 and
for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, included
in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2003, is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (Nos. 33-62450 and 33-65156).

Very truly yours,




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




                                      160

<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 15








November 13, 2003






Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated November 13, 2003 on our review of
consolidated interim financial information of Pennsylvania Electric Company as
of September 30, 2003 and for the three and nine month periods ended September
30, 2003 and 2002, included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2003, is incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-62295, 333-62295-01 and
333-62295-02).

Very truly yours,




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


                                      161
<PAGE>