alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MeGUINESS, Appellant, v. ALLISON SALTY CO. et al., Respondents.

(Supreme iurt, Appellate Division, First Department,

February 23, 1906.)

Action by Denis McGuini against the Allison Realty Company and lers.

A. Ofner, for appellant.

T. Connoly, : respondents.

No opinion. Judgment (93 N. Supp. 267) affirmed, with costs, with leave plaintiff to amend on payment of costs in is court and in the court below. Order filed.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Systems Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, AJ Vesak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 11th day of November, 2008.

BY:
/s/ AJ VESAK                        Alexander Vesak, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION CERTIFICATION I, Stephen W. Lilienthal, Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CNA Financial Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Dated:  April 30, 2004
    By
    /s/ Stephen W. LilienthalStephen W. LilienthalChief Executive Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1127 

To allow for cooperative research activities between the Department of Homeland Security and Taiwan to strengthen preparedness against cyber 

threats and enhance capabilities in cybersecurity, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2023 

Mr. TONY GONZALES of Texas (for himself and Ms. SHERRILL) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To allow for cooperative research activities between the Department of Homeland Security and Taiwan to strengthen preparedness against cyber threats and enhance capabilities in cybersecurity, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States-Taiwan 

5 Advanced Research Partnership Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1127 IH

1 SEC. 2. COOPERATIVE HOMELAND SECURITY RESEARCH 

2 AND ANTITERRORISM PROGRAMS RELATING 

3 TO CYBERSECURITY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—As part of the international coop5 erative activities authorized under section 317 of the 

6 Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 195c), the 

7 Under Secretary for Science and Technology of the De8 partment of Homeland Security, in coordination with the 

9 Secretary of State and other appropriate Federal officials, 

10 may enter into cooperative research activities with Taiwan 

11 to strengthen preparedness against cyber threats and en12 hance capabilities in cybersecurity. 

13 (b) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date 

14 of the enactment of this section, the Under Secretary for 

15 Science and Technology of the Department of Homeland 

16 Security shall submit to Congress a report consisting of 

17 a status update on the progress of forming, executing, or 

18 implementing agreements with Taiwan for cooperative ac19 tivities to strengthen preparedness against cyber threats 

20 and enhance capabilities in cybersecurity. Such report 

21 shall also detail any administrative, legal, or diplomatic 

22 challenges or resource constraints relating to such agree23 ments or activities, as the case may be. 

24 (c) PROHIBITION.—No additional funds are author25 ized to be appropriated to carry out this section. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### VAN DE CARR, Respondent, v. CROUCH at al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 23, 1906.)

Action by Sarah L. Van De Carr, as, etc., against Frank P. Crouch and others.

I~o opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Oscar Nelson, as Auditor of Public Accounts of the State of Illinois, Chicago Trust Company, receiver of Roosevelt-Bankers State Bank, appellee, v. Supreme Liberty Life Insurance Company and David Manson, appellants.

Gen. No. 35,190.

Opinion filed May 13, 1931.

Earl B. Dickerson and Theophilus M. Mann, for appellants; Earl B. Dickerson, of counsel.

L. J. Behan and Wm. J. Corrigan, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Hebei

delivered the opinion of the court.
Order entered October 19 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00362
- CR No. 05
- 18
- 0036 3
- CR No. 05
- 18
- 0036 4
- CR JOHN F. SEAY, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Ap pellee On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F17
- 44837
- P , F17
- 44838
- P & F17
- 44846
- P 

### O RDER
We REINSTATE this appeal. On September 27, 2018, we ordered court reporter Lisabeth Kellet to file a supplem ental reporter’s record containing a true and correct playable copy of State’s Exhibit 1 by October 7, 2018. To date, the exhibit has not been filed and we have had no communication from Ms. Kellett. We ORDER State’s Exhibit No. 1 filed WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER

. If the exhibit is not filed by October 26, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., we will order that court reporter Lisabeth Kellet not sit until the exhibit is filed.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Teresa Hawthorne, Presiding Judge, 203rd Judicial District Court; to L isabe th Kellett,court reporter, 203rd Judicial District Court; to Bruce Anton , and to the Dallas County District

Attorney’s Office.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of the order by first

- class mail, to John Seay , 1822 Young Street, Dallas, TX 75201. These appeals were abated for a hearing to determine whether appellant should be allowed to represent himself in these appeals. Because we are still awaiting the trial cour t’s findings and, if appropriate, appellant’s signed waiver of counsel in substantially the form provided by article 1.051(g) of the code of criminal procedure, we again ABATE these appeals to allow the trial court to comply with our September 28, 2018 ord er.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                            998
<SECURITIES>                   46,647
<RECEIVABLES>                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 49,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0
<BONDS>                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                          447
<OTHER-SE>                    (26,801)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   49,401
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    0
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                3,283
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (2,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                     (123)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (2,248)
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                   (2,248)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.05)



</TABLE>
#### 647.207 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and special requirements.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the annual report of Twin Lakes  Delaware,  Inc. ( (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kirk M. Warshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Kirk M. Warshaw
-------------------
Kirk M. Warshaw
Chief Financial Officer
April 10, 2007

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# Ul-15 ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 04-14-00279-CR AGGRAVATED 

### OFFENSE: SEXUAL ASSAULT FILIBERTO SIERRA v THE 

## STYLE: stateoftexas COUNTY: BEXAR COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 175TH DATE:06/17/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 2011CR8109



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD CCA#: 

### STYLE: «Style1»v. «Style2» 

# APPELLANTS Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: ///zL^W* JUDGE: fa/ht^y&lfiy/J<?f^ PUBLISH: 

# %IMS CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR
#### 9905.506-62 Exemption.

None for this Standard.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
related Form 10-Q financial statements for The Cleveland Electric
Illuminating Company and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements. (Amounts in 1,000's). Income tax expense includes
$4,087,000 related to other income.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000020947
<NAME> THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,025,189
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    699,817
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         340,702
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,099,165
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,164,873
<COMMON>                                       931,962
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             55,574
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 987,536
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          116,246
<PREFERRED>                                    238,325
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,694,621
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             111,464
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  175,030
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       33,464
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                26,863
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,781,324
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,164,873
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      423,657
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            25,417
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     315,544
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     336,874
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         86,783
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               3,428
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  90,211
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        51,501
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,710
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      7,790
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   30,920
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        10,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      204,011
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          57,320
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Joseph Quatrochi et al., Appellants, v City of New Rochelle, Respondent.

[775 NYS2d 900]

*631In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondent City of New Rochelle from requiring the petitioners to perform out-of-title work, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated July 7, 2003, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The new duties required of the petitioners by their employer were “reasonably related” to and a “logical extension” of the other duties enumerated in their title specification and thus did not constitute out-of-title work *(see Matter of Gavigan v McCoy,*37 NY2d 548, 551 [1975]; *Matter of Gergis v Governor’s Off. of Empl. Relations,*206 AD2d 766 [1994]; *Glasbrenner v Bellacosa,*139 AD2d 491 [1988]; *Court Officers Benevolent Assn. of Nassau County v Sise,*127 AD2d 625 [1987]). Consequently, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding.

In light of our determination, it is unnecessary to address the petitioners’ remaining contention. Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
#### In re EGAN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 22, 1906.)

In the matter of the judicial settlement of the account of proceedings of K. Francis X. Egan as executor and trustee under the last will and testament of Kieran Egan, deceased.

No opinion. Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county affirmed, with costs.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1069 

AN ACT 

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to 

require reporting regarding clean energy demonstration 

projects, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1069 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Energy Dem3 onstration Transparency Act of 2023’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT REPORT5 ING REQUIREMENTS. 

6 Subsection (h) of section 41201 of the Infrastructure 

7 Investment and Jobs Act (42 U.S.C. 18861) is amended 

8 by adding at the end following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(3) FURTHER REPORTS.— 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than six 

11 months after the date of the enactment of this 

12 paragraph and at least semiannually thereafter, 

13 the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on 

14 Science, Space, and Technology and the Com15 mittee on Appropriations of the House of Rep16 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and 

17 Natural Resources and the Committee on Ap18 propriations of the Senate a report, and make 

19 publicly available in digital online format, that 

20 contains, for the period covered by each such 

21 report, for each covered project or other dem22 onstration project administered or supported by 

23 the program, the following: 

24 ‘‘(i) A copy of any initial contracts or 

25 financial assistance agreements executed 

26 between the Department and an award re-
3 

•HR 1069 EH

1 cipient, including any related documenta2 tion, as the Secretary determines appro3 priate. 

4 ‘‘(ii) A list of any material, technical, 

5 or financial milestones that have or have 

6 not been met. 

7 ‘‘(iii) Any material modifications to 

8 the scope, schedule, funding profile (in9 cluding cost-share requirements), project 

10 partners or participating entities, or budg11 et of the project. 

12 ‘‘(B) STREAMLINING.—To the extent prac13 ticable, the Secretary may synchronize the re14 ports required under subparagraph (A) with 

15 other required reports, such as those required 

16 under— 

17 ‘‘(i) paragraph (1); and 

18 ‘‘(ii) section 9005(e) of the Energy 

19 Act of 2020 (42 U.S.C. 7256c(e); enacted 
4 

•HR 1069 EH

1 as division Z of the Consolidated Appro2 priations Act, 2021).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1069 

AN ACT 

To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs 

demonstration projects, and for other purposes. Act to require reporting regarding clean energy
#### § 1.416 Comment period.

Written comments on a sourcing area application or on a formal review of a sourcing area shall include the docket number and may be submitted to the Judge for 30 calendar days following publication of the notice. Persons submitting comments shall send a copy of the comments to the Regional Forester of the region in which the manufacturing facility being sourced is located. All comments must be received by the Judge and by the Regional Forester by the 30th day of the comment period.
Third Department,

January, 1979

(January 2, 1979)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Paul Hunt, Petitioner, v Eugene S. LeFevre, as Superintendent of the Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

— Application for writ of habeas corpus dated October 16, 1978 denied. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
#### WOLFF, Appellant, v. ROTH et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department

October 5, 1906.)

Action by Gustave Wolff against Peter Roth and Samuel Rudner.

No opinion. Motion to compel filing of the return granted. If it is impossible to procure a copy of the evidence taken upon the trial, that fact should be made to appear, and the reason stated.
August 21, 2016 

Mr. Stanley Pacheco 

DreameX Corp 

7601 E Treasure Drive 

North Bay Village, FL 33141 

Re: FAA-2015-8650 

Dear Mr. Pacheco: 

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already. 

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Gregg Appliances, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry W. Throgmartin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    JERRY W. THROGMARTINJerry W. ThrogmartinChairman and Chief Executive Officer




Dated: November 14,
2005