alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resources to Assist Apprenticeship Programs      

# Resources to Assist Apprenticeship Programs

This page, developed by Workforce GPS, features resources and tools that employers and organizations can use to learn about apprenticeship and how it can be implemented. 

https://www.workforcegps.org/sitecore/content/global/resources/2018/10/16/17/08/Resources-to-Assist-Apprenticeship-Programs
Stanton SRMA

Yarnell Hang

Gliding Management

Area

YARNELL

Yarnell SRMA

32

05

34

23

35

13

07

31

21 22

29

11

20

08

14 17

05

27 26 30

09 12 08

19

06

01

28

09

24

16

33 36

02

24

18

25

03

10 12

04

13 15

10

07

25

11

36

12

01

12

01

08

05 02 06 04 01 03

32

29

20

17

08

31

30

19

18

07

06 05

06

07

35 36 31 33 34 32 31 32 36

02

13 18

11

09

17

04

14

16

35

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

± Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

Map 2-32

Yarnell Hang Gliding RMZ

Area

Alternative B

0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

Miles

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Special Recreation

Management Area

(SRMA)

Iz

Iz

Yarnell Hang Gliding

RMZ

Section
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________
No. 96-10374

_____________________ ELIZABETH JUSTINA YORK,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_______________________________ ___________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(2:95-CV-63)

_________________________________________________________________ October 9, 1996 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Elizabeth Justina York contests an adverse summary judgment,
contending that the denial of her applicati on for disability

benefits was not supported by substantial evidence. Pursuant to

our review of the record, we affirm for essentially the reasons
given by the district court in adopting the magistrate judge’s

report. York v. Chater , No. 2:95-CV-63 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 1996)
(unpublished).- 2 - AFFIRMED
917.7001 Policy. ( a ) When DOE supports performer research, development, and/or demonstration efforts, where the principal purpose is ultimate commercialization and utilization of the technologies by the private sector, and when there are reasonable expectations that the performer will receive present or future economic benefits beyond the instant contract as a result of performance of the effort, it is DOE policy to obtain cost participation. Full funding may be provided for early phases of development programs when the technological problems are still great.
( b ) In making the determination to obtain cost participation, and evaluating present and future economic benefits to the performer, DOE will consider the technical feasibility, projected economic viability, societal and political acceptability of commercial application, as well as possible effects of other DOE-supported projects in competing technologies.
( c ) The propriety, manner, and amount of cost participation must be decided on a case-by-case basis.
( d ) Cost participation is required for demonstration projects unless exempted by the Under Secretary. Demonstration projects, pursuant to this subpart, include demonstrations of technological advances and field demonstrations of new methods and procedures, and demonstrations of prototype commercial applications for the exploration, development, production, transportation, conversion, and utilization of energy resources.
§ 1007.10 Producer-handler. *Producer-handler* means a person who: ( a ) Operates a dairy farm and a distributing plant from which there is route disposition in the marketing area, and from which total route disposition and packaged sales of fluid milk products to other plants during the month does not exceed 3 million pounds;
( b ) Receives no fluid milk products, and acquires no fluid milk products for route disposition, from sources other than own farm production;
( c ) Disposes of no other source milk as Class I milk except by increasing the nonfat milk solids content of the fluid milk products received from own farm production; and
( d ) Provides proof satisfactory to the market administrator that the care and management of the dairy animals and other resources necessary to produce all Class I milk handled, and the processing and packaging operations, are the producer-handler's own enterprise and are operated at the producer-handler's own risk.
( e ) Any producer-handler with Class I route dispositions and/or transfers of packaged fluid milk products in the marketing area described in § 1131.2 of this chapter shall be subject to payments into the Order 1131 producer settlement fund on such dispositions pursuant to § 1000.76(a) and payments into the Order 1131 administrative fund provided such dispositions are less than three million pounds in the current month and such producer-handler had total Class I route dispositions and/or transfers of packaged fluid milk products from own farm production of three million pounds or more the previous month. If the producer-handler has Class I route dispositions and/or transfers of packaged fluid milk products into the marketing area described in § 1131.2 of this chapter of three million pounds or more during the current month, such producer-handler shall be subject to the provisions described in § 1131.7 of this chapter or § 1000.76(a).
[64 FR 47971, Sept. 1, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 25499, May 1, 2006; 75 FR 21160, Apr. 23, 2010]
#### PEOPLE ex rel. De NOYELLES v. BOARD OF SUP’RS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Theodore De Noyelles, against the board of supervisors of Rockland county.

No opinion. Motion granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 05-744V

Filed: May 13, 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

RICHARD CURLEY and *

THERESA CURLEY, parents of *

T.C., a minor, *

*

Petitioners, * Autism; Stipulation; 

v. * Attorney Fees and Costs

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Robert Krakow, Esq. Law Office of Robert Krakow, P.C., New York, NY for petitioners.

Lynn Ricciardella, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,2 I issued 

a decision on October 24, 2013, that dismissed this case. On May 12, 2014, the parties 

filed a stipulation for attorney fees and costs and a statement pursuant to General Order 

#9 conveying that petitioners incurred no personal litigation costs. The stipulation 

indicates that after informal discussions, petitioners amended their fees and costs 

request to an amount that respondent does not object.

I find that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a 

reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems 

reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, I hereby award the total $28,885.443 in 

1 When this decision was originally issued, petitioners were informed that the decision would be posted in 

accordance with the E-Government of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified 

as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). Petitioners were also notified that they could seek 

redaction pursuant to § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B); Vaccine Rule 18(b). Petitioners made a timely request for 

redaction and this decision is being made public with the name of the minor child redacted to initials. 

2 The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. 

(2006). 

3 This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all 

charges by the attorney against a client, “advanced costs” as well as fees for legal services rendered. 

 
the form of a check payable jointly to petitioners and petitioners’ counsel of 

record for petitioners’ attorney fees and costs.

The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Denise K. Vowell

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master

Furthermore, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including 

costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec’y, HHS, 924 

F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).

4 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing of a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 

See Vaccine Rule 11(a).

2
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08212013 [9/13/2013 12:38:56 PM] Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION & INFORMATION POLICY 

### About OIRA Information Policy Federal Collection of Information Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside Communication Reports to Congress For Agencies Statistical Programs & Standards 

# Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generation Units Date: 8 / 21 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable) Bob Wayland EPA
Nick Hudson EPA Christian Fellner EPA Nathan Frey OMB/OIRA
Brian Toth Southern Company Drew McConville CEQ Jim Laity OMB Chase Crawford Southern Company
Thomas Wells Southern Company Ray Harry Southern Company Pat Quinn Southern Company
Bruce Rodan OSTP Danny Herrin

Meeting material provided to OMB ( pages, kb)

Document 1 (6 pages, 373 kb) 

### About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home The White House Blog Photos & Videos
Photo Galleries Video Briefing Room Your Weekly Address Speeches & Remarks Press Briefings Statements & Releases Issues Civil Rights Defense Disabilities Economy The Administration
President Barack Obama Vice President Joe Biden First Lady Michelle Obama Dr. Jill Biden About the White House
Inside the White House Presidents First Ladies The Oval Office Our Government
The Executive Branch The Legislative Branch The Judicial Branch The Constitution Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site SearchMeeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08212013 [9/13/2013 12:38:56 PM] Performances Live Streams Podcasts White House Schedule Presidential Actions Legislation Nominations & Appointments Disclosures Education Energy & Environment Ethics Equal Pay Foreign Policy Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Refinancing Rural Service Seniors & Social Security Snapshots Taxes Technology Urban and Economic Mobility Veterans Violence Prevention Women The Cabinet White House Staff Executive Office of the President Other Advisory Boards The Vice President's Residence & Office Eisenhower Executive Office Building Camp David Air Force One White House Fellows White House Internships Tours & Events Mobile Apps Federal Agencies & Commissions Elections & Voting State & Local Government Resources

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****A geochemical exploration forantimony in southeastern Alaska**
 
Report | Plates: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1024-H
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000965767
 
October 31, 2018
##### 



Exhibit 31-7
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    RULE 13a-14(a)
    AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
    AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  I,
    John L. Skolds, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    of PECO Energy Company;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e))
    for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and  (c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants second fiscal quarter that has materially
    affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
    registrants internal control over financial
    reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have
    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
    control over financial reporting, to the registrants
    auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and  (b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  
      176
#### 9.109-3 Exception.

The prohibition in 9.109-2 does not apply to contracts for the procurement of products or services along a major route of supply to a zone of active combat or major contingency operation, as specified in statute or by the cognizant Combatant Commander, in consultation with the Chief of Mission. As of May 10, 2018, countries along the major route of supply to support operations in Afghanistan are Afghanistan, Georgia, the Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, the Republic of Armenia, the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Republic of Tajikistan, the Republic of Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan.

[83 FR 28148, June 15, 2018]
#### 752.228-9 Cargo insurance.

As prescribed in 728.313(a), the following preface is to be used preceding the text of the clause at (48 CFR) FAR 52.228-9:

# Cargo Insurance (DEC 1998)

Preface: To the extent that marine insurance is necessary or appropriate under this contract, the contractor shall ensure that U.S. marine insurance companies are offered a fair opportunity to bid for such insurance. This requirement shall be included in all subcontracts under this contract.

(End of clause)

[53 FR 50632, Dec. 16, 1988, as amended at 79 FR 74999, Dec. 16, 2014; 89 FR 4209, Jan. 23, 2024]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Constantine McLAUGHLIN, a.k.a. Conrad, a.k.a. Face, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-1200-cr.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 6, 2007.

*111Daniel S. Silver (David C. James, Elizabeth J. Kramer, Assistant United States Attorneys, of counsel, on the brief), Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel, for Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, NY, for Appellee.

Phillip Katowitz, Brooklyn, NY, for Defendant-Appellant.

Present: Hon. THOMAS J. MESKILL,* Hon. ROBERTA. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges, Hon. EDWARD R. KORMAN, District Judge.**

*

 The Honorable Thomas J. Meskill, who was a member of this panel died on October 29, 2007. Prior to his death, he participated in the consideration and decision of this case. The two remaining members of the panel decide this appeal pursuant to 2d. Cir. R. § 0.14(b).

**

 The Honorable Edward R. Korman, Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Constantine McLaughlin appeals from a judgment of conviction, dated March 14, 2006, principally sentencing McLaughlin to 10 years’ imprisonment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the proceedings below, and the specification of issues on appeal.

While McLaughlin’s challenges to the judgment of conviction are without merit, we note that the district court erred when it concluded that McLaughlin’s statement to police was not a confession for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 3501 because the *112statement was exculpatory.1 The Government used McLaughlin’s statement against him, both because it established that he was on Staten Island on the day of the murder and because it established that he lied to the FBI about his activities that day. This use of McLaughlin’s account made his statement “self-incriminating,” *id.*§ 3501(e), even if he had not intended it to be so, and therefore satisfied the statutory definition of a confession.

Even if McLaughlin’s statement was a confession, the district court did not err by failing to instruct the jury on voluntariness because that issue was never raised at trial. *See United States v. Fuentes,*563 F.2d 527, 535 (2d Cir.1977) (noting that an instruction on voluntariness under § 3501 is only mandated “where an issue of voluntariness has in fact been raised at trial”). Moreover, any error in failing to instruct the jury on voluntariness would not have been prejudicial, as the Government made limited use of McLaughlin’s statement at trial.

We have considered all of the defendant’s other arguments and find them without merit. Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

1

. We presume without deciding that the portion of 18 U.S.C. § 3501(a) requiring the trial court in certain instances to instruct the jury on the issue of voluntariness survives *Dickerson v. United States,*530 U.S. 428, 120 S.Ct. 2326, 147 L.Ed.2d 405 (2000).