alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                              PRESIDION CORPORATION

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Brian Jarzynski, Chief Financial Officer of Presidion Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-14 (b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18 of
the United States Code that:

     1.   the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
          31, 2003 (the "Report"), to which this statement is filed as an
          exhibit, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 13, 2004

                                                  /S/ Brian Jarzynski
                                                  -------------------
                                                  Brian Jarzynski
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tarelle Davis, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 802]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.), rendered May 30, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The credible evidence, including the victim’s testimony as to the pursuit and capture of defendant, clearly established that defendant was the person who assaulted the victim.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 3 957

_____________________________
D EPARTMENT OF H EALTH , Appellant,

v.

J OSEPH A. A STAPHAN , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings

. Mary Li Creasy
, Administrative Law Judge

.

June 10, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , M.K. T HOMAS , and T ANENBAUM , JJ.
, concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Sarah Young Hodges
, Chief Appellate Counsel, Department of Health, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Sean M. Ellsworth
, Ellsworth Law Firm, P.A., Miami Beach, for Appellee.
970.3102-05-30-70 Patent costs and technology transfer costs. ( a ) For management and operating contracts that do not include the clause at 970.5227-3, Technology Transfer Mission, the cost principle at 48 CFR 31.205-30 applies.
( b ) For management and operating contracts that do include the clause at 970.5227-3, Technology Transfer Mission, the following patent and technology transfer costs are allowable— ( 1 ) Costs of preparing invention disclosures, reports, and other patent related documents required by the contract;
( 2 ) Costs of searching the art relating to invention disclosures;
( 3 ) Costs incurred in connection with the filing and prosecution of patent applications for subject inventions, except where those costs are incurred as part of a privately funded technology transfer program recognized under the contract; and
( 4 ) Other costs incurred in accordance with the patent rights clause and the Technology Transfer Mission clause included in the contract.
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 36373, July 22, 2009]
thrm-ex101_6.htm



EXHIBIT 10.1

AMENDMENT TO THE EXECUTIVE NONQUALIFIED DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN ADOPTION AGREEMENT

This AMENDMENT TO THE EXECUTIVE NONQUALIFIED DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN ADOPTION AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made by GENTHERM INCORPORTED (the “Company”) effective as of May 19, 2017.  

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Company adopted the Executive Nonqualified Defined Benefit Plan (the “Plan”) with an effective date of April 1, 2008 and subsequently amended and restated the Plan with an effective date of September 5, 2012; and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to modify certain provisions of the Plan;

NOW, THEREOFRE, the Company hereby adopts this Amendment. 

ARTICLE I

Terms used in this Amendment shall have the same meaning as in the Plan, unless some other meaning is expressly herein set forth.  Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the terms of the Plan remain unmodified, in full force and effect.

ARTICLE II

Section 4.2 of the Adoption Agreement, setting forth the designations or elections for purposes of the Plan, is hereby amended and restated to read, in its entirety, as follows:

4.2Benefit Formula.

If the Qualifying Distribution Event is Separation from Service prior to January 1, 2018, the Participant’s Accrued Benefit is an amount of $300,000 paid annually.  If the Qualifying Distribution Event is reaching the in-service date of January 1, 2018 while still in service, the Participant’s Accrued Benefit is an amount of $342,000 paid annually.

If the Qualifying Distribution Event if the Participant’s Death or becoming Disabled, the Accrued Benefit is the amount in Section 6 based on the Participant’s election.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the day and year above stated. 

 


	
Gentherm Incorporated

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Maurice E.P. Gunderson

	
 
	
 
	
Maurice E.P. Gunderson

	
 
	
 
	
Chairman of the Compensation

	
 
	
 
	
Committee and Authorized Person
#### 9901.311 Executive sessions.

During the course of a Board meeting, any Board Member may request that for any portion of the meeting, the Board meet in executive session. The Chairman shall thereupon order such a session.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           National Institutes of Health      

# National Institutes of Health

National Institutes of Health is the nation's medical research agency-making important discoveries that improve health and save lives.

http://www.nih.gov/
# Jornal Oficial C 166I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 166I |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 62.° ano15 de maio de 2019 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 166I

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

62.° ano15 de maio de 2019

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | Retificações |
| 2019/C 166 I/01 | Retificação do anúncio de vaga — N.o ref.a: eu-LISA/19/TA/AD13/4.1 ( JO C 136 A de 12.4.2019 ) | 1 |

Índice

Página

Retificações

2019/C 166 I/01

Retificação do anúncio de vaga — N.o ref.a: eu-LISA/19/TA/AD13/4.1 ( JO C 136 A de 12.4.2019 )

o

a

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

Retificações

| 15.5.2019 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CI 166/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2019

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CI 166/1

---

Retificação do anúncio de vaga — N.o ref.a: eu-LISA/19/TA/AD13/4.1

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 136 A de 12 de abril de 2019
  )

(2019/C 166 I/01)

Na página 1, na tabela, «Nível de credenciação de segurança»:

onde se lê:

«TRÈS SECRET UE/EU TOP SECRET»,

deve ler-se:

deve ler-se

«SECRET UE/EU SECRET».

Na página 1, na tabela, «Data-limite para apresentação das candidaturas»:

onde se lê:

onde se lê

«21 de maio de 2019 23:59 EET e 22:59 CET»,

deve ler-se:

deve ler-se

«17 de junho de 2019 23:59 EET e 22:59 CET».

Na página 9, no ponto 10, «PROCESSO DE CANDIDATURA», no terceiro parágrafo:

onde se lê:

onde se lê

«Data-limite para apresentação das candidaturas: 21 de maio de 2019 às 23:59 EET (hora da Europa oriental) e 22:59 CET (hora da Europa central).»,

deve ler-se:

deve ler-se

«Data-limite para apresentação das candidaturas: 17 de junho de 2019 às 23:59 EET (hora da Europa oriental) e 22:59 CET (hora da Europa central).».

---
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 20, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00893-CR

NO. 14-14-00894-CR

CHARLES EDWARD BELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1412841, 1413580

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant appeals two convictions for aggravated robbery with a deadly 

weapon. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in each appeal which she 

concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Each brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a 

professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable 

grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. 
2

App. 1978).

Copies of counsel’s briefs were delivered to appellant. Appellant filed a pro 

se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 

We have reviewed the records, counsel’s briefs, and appellant’s response

carefully and agree each appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we 

find no reversible error in either record. We are not to address the merits of each 

claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined 

there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### § 1124.40 Classes of utilization.

See § 1000.40.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: A Guide to Effective Collaborations with Community-Based Organizations to Support Students Experiencing Homelessness      

# Report: A Guide to Effective Collaborations with Community-Based Organizations to Support Students Experiencing Homelessness

The report (PDF, 17 pages) describes effective strategies for collaborating with community-based organizations at the state and local levels for program implementation. The report includes examples of collaborations between local education agencies and community-based organizations. The report is designed for state coordinators for homeless education, local homeless education liaisons, and community-based organizations that work with young people experiencing homelessness. **Learn more.**
[Cite as In re A.B., 2021-Ohio-3403.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

WARREN COUNTY 

IN RE: 

 A.B. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

CASE NO. CA2021-04-037 

D E C I S I O N 

9/27/2021 

APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

JUVENILE DIVISION 

Case No. 19-D000034 

Julie Kraft, for appellee. 

Andrew J. Brenner, for appellant. 

Nathan Boone, for mother. 

Brooke Logsdon, for CASA. 

 Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, A.B.'s biological father, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the 

transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common 

Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. 
{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of 

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous. 

PIPER, P.J., HENDRICKSON and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Share with Youth: American Connection Corps      

# Share with Youth: American Connection Corps

**Application deadline:**Rolling basis 

The American Connection Corps (ACC) is an AmeriCorps service experience dedicated to advancing economic prosperity in rural and legacy communities. ACC Members commit to a year of local service addressing the digital divide while serving in one of three program areas: 
                  -  Community & Economic Development  
                  -  Health & Social Capital  
                  -  Agriculture & Natural Resources.   

Full-time members attend quarterly training intensives and receive a $33,000 stipend; a $7,395 AmeriCorps Education Award; medical, dental, and vision coverage; access to a national network of members, community partners, alumni, and 1:1 supports; and student loan forbearance and child care support. The service year will begin in early September 2024.**Learn more and apply.**
#### § 1.316 *Ex parte* contacts.

Except to the extent required for the disposition of *ex parte* matters as authorized by law, the ALJ shall not consult or be consulted by any person or party (except employees of the ALJ's office) on any matter in issue, unless on notice and opportunity for all parties to participate.
#### In the Matter of New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Appellant, v Roodlyf Bresil et al., Respondents.

[777 NYS2d 174]

In a proceeding pursuant to CELR article 75 to permanently stay an uninsured motorist arbitration, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Silverman, J.H.O.), dated August 5, 2003, which, after a hearing, denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the petition is granted, and the arbitration is permanently stayed.

The respondent Countryway Insurance Company, formerly known as Agway Insurance Company (hereinafter Countryway), disclaimed coverage to its insured, the respondent Jacques C. Albert, inter alia, on the ground of his lack of cooperation, in accordance with the terms of its policy. The petitioner commenced this proceeding to permanently stay the uninsured motorist arbitration claim of its insured on the ground that the other vehicle involved in the accident was insured. After a hearing, the Supreme Court found that Albert had failed to cooperate with Countryway and that Countryway had properly disclaimed coverage.

An insurer who seeks to disclaim coverage on the ground of noncooperation is required to demonstrate that (1) it acted diligently in seeking to bring about the insured’s cooperation, (2) the efforts employed by the insurer were reasonably calculated to obtain the insured’s cooperation, and (3) the attitude of the insured, after his cooperation was sought, was one of willful and avowed obstruction *(see Thrasher v United States*
      *717
      *Liab. Ins. Co.,*19 NY2d 159, 168-169 [1967]; *New York State Ins. Fund v Merchants Ins. Co. of N.H.,*5 AD3d 449 [2004]; *Matter of Metlife Auto & Home v Burgos,*4 AD3d 477 [2004]).

Here, Countryway failed to establish that it met the above requirements. While Albert initially declined to answer any questions and provided Countryway with the telephone number of his attorney, other than sending a letter to Albert’s attorney, Countryway’s investigator made no other efforts to secure the attorney’s assistance in procuring Albert’s examination under oath. Thus, Countryway failed to establish that its actions were sufficiently diligent and were reasonably calculated to obtain Albert’s cooperation *(see Matter of Statewide Ins. Co. v Ray,*125 AD2d 573 [1986]; *Van Opdorp v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co.,*55 AD2d 810 [1976]; *Alexander v Stone,*45 AD2d 216 [1974]; *Coleman v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.,*28 AD2d 1073 [1967]; *National Grange Mut. Ins. Co. v Lococo,*20 AD2d 785 [1964], *affd*16 NY2d 585 [1965]). Furthermore, Albert’s refusal to answer questions and his referral to his attorney do not reflect an attitude of willful and avowed obstruction *(see Coleman v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., supra; see also Matter of Empire Mut. Ins. Co.,*36 NY2d 719 [1975]).

Since Countryway failed to establish a right to disclaim coverage on the ground of lack of cooperation, the petition to permanently stay the uninsured motorist arbitration claim of the petitioner’s insured should have been granted. Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATE**

In connection withthe Annual Report of VIASYS Healthcare Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Randy H. Thurman andMartin P. Galvan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

March 6,2007
| /s/ RANDY  H. THURMAN                                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Randy H. Thurman                                            |   |
| Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer             |   |
| /s/ MARTIN P. GALVAN                                        |   |
| Martin P. Galvan                                            |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer           |   |
| Information Technology  and Director of  Investor Relations |   |

 

----