alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-95,160-01

EX P A RTE HARRY LEE G RADNEY, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION F OR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1472795-A IN THE 208TH DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . Y E A R

Y , J. concurred.

O P I N I O N Applicant pleaded g u ilty to delivery of a controlled substanc e a n d w a s sentenced to eig ht months’ imprisonment under T ex as Penal Code § 12.44(a). Applicant did not file a d i rect appeal. Applicant filed this a

p p lication for a writ o f habeas corpus in the county o f conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . a rt. 11.07. Applicant d ischarg ed this sentence in 2016. The habeas court find s c redible Applicant’s assertion that he suffers current and potential f u t ure consequences arising from this conviction, including trouble finding a job; enhanced penalties fo r future convictions; and potential impeachment of his credibility in future judicial hearing s. Therefore , A p p l i cant is “confined” f or purposes of Article 11.07.2

Applicant c laims that he w as denied due process throug h the u se of material false evidence, and that his g u ilty plea was involuntar y . T h es e c l ai ms r elate to the discovery o f misconduct by former Houston Police Officer Gerald Goines, who was the primary officer involved in the alleg ed offense. B ased on the record, the habeas court finds that Applicant was denied due p r ocess by the

use of material false evidence a g ainst him, and that Applicant’s g u ilty p lea was involuntary

. Ex parte Mathews, 6 38 S.W .3d 685 ( T e x . C r i m . App. 2 022); Ex parte Coty , 418 S.W .3d 597 (Tex

. Crim. App. 2014). T he habeas court recommends g ranting relief o n false evidence and involuntary plea g rounds. W e ag ree. R e l i e f is g ranted. E

x parte Chabot , 300 S.W .3d 768, 7 72 (Tex

. Crim. App. 2009). T h e judg ment in cause number 147279501010 in the 208th District Court of Harris County is set aside. Applicant shall answer the charg es a s s e t out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary orders within ten day s from the date of this Court’s mandate. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the T e x as Department o f Cri m i n a l Ju s t i c e

– C o r r e c t i onal I nstitutions Division and the B oard of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: October 18, 2023 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Vermont Pure Holdings, Ltd.
Randolph, Vermont


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-95908  on Form S-8 of  Vermont  Pure  Holdings,  Ltd.  of our  report,  dated
December 14, 2001,  appearing in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Vermont Pure
Holdings, Ltd. for the year ended October 31, 2001.


                                                 /s/Feldman Sherb & Co. P.C.
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                    Feldman Sherb & Co. P.C.
                                                    Certified Public Accountants
New York, New York
December 14, 2001
#### 970.5223-6 Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management.

In accordance with the prescriptions at 923.002(b) or 970.2301-2(b), insert the following in contracts for the operation of a DOE facility or motor vehicle fleet.

# Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management (OCT 2010)

Since this contract involves Contractor operation of Government-owned facilities and/or motor vehicles, the provisions of Executive Order 13423 are applicable to the Contractor to the same extent they would be applicable if the Government were operating the facilities or motor vehicles. Information on the requirements of the Executive Order may be found at *http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/.*

(End of clause)

[75 FR 57695, Sept. 22, 2010]
September 21, 2016

Lt. Col. Matthew Niendorf Chief, Flight Directives Division Department of the Air Force

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169

Dear Lieutenant Colonel Niendorf:

This is in response to your June 14, 2016, letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2001- 9409) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of the Department of the Air Force (USAF) for an exemption from § 91.159 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow the USAF to operate its U-2 aircraft under visual flight rules at or above flight level 600 without maintaining the appropriate cruising altitudes as prescribed by § 91.159.

In reviewing the USAF’s petition, it has been determined that the USAF no longer needs this exemption. Exemption 130, as amended, is set to expire on September 30, 2016.

Section 91.159(b) prescribes that when operating above 18,000 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL), aircraft should maintain the altitude or flight level assigned by Air Traffic Control (ATC).

Therefore, operations above 18,000 feet MSL, in cluding operations at and above flight level 600, are not subject to the requirements of § 91.159(a). Accordingly, we will take no further action on your petition for extension and the current exemption will expire on September 30,

2016.2 If you have any additional questions, please contact the General Aviation and Commercial Division at (202) 267-1100 or Aviation Safety Inspector Dave Bear at (941) 330-3200.

Sincerely,

/s/

James M. Crotty Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-0573; Dir ID 2011-NM-082-AD

X-Ref AD 2007-06-18
#### § 1001.3 Route disposition.

See § 1000.3.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vermont Pure
Holdings, Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended October 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best
knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

/s/ Bruce S. MacDonald
----------------------
Bruce S. MacDonald
Chief Financial Officer

Date: January 31, 2005
Exhibit 4.2


  


INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE


STATE OF MARYLAND





 




	 	 	 
	
        NUMBER

        B-
	ESQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

                                                                                New York, New York
	SHARES
	 	 	 




 


FULLY
PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE


SERIES B NON-VOTING PREFERRED STOCK, PAR
VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE


 


THIS CERTIFIES that ________________________________________
is the


 


registered holder of ___________________________________________
Shares


 


transferable only on the books the Corporation
by the holder hereof, in person or by Attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed.


 


This _______________ day of ________________
A.D.__________


 


	By:	 	 	[SEAL]	By:	 
	 	Andrew C. Sagliocca, President	 	 	 	Eric Bader, Secretary


 




     


     


    

 


For value received,
_______________________________________________hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


 


_________________________________________________________________________________Shares


 


represented by the within Certificate,
and do hereby irrevocably constitute and


 


appoint ________________________________________________________________ Attorney
to transfer the said


 


Shares on the books of the within
named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


Dated, _______________________________


 


	In the presence of	 	Signature:
	 	 	 
	 	 	 


 


NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE OF THIS
ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.


 


The securities
represented by this certificate have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”),
or registered or qualified under the securities laws of any state. The holder of the securities cannot make any sale, assignment
or other transfer of any such securities except pursuant to an offering of such securities duly registered under the Act and registered
or qualified under any applicable state securities laws, or under such other circumstances as, in the opinion of counsel for (or
counsel satisfactory to) EQUIRE FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, iNC., shall not, at the time, require registration under the Act and/or registration
or qualification under any applicable state securities laws
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

The
undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1) The
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the periods ended June 30, 2010,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |    |                                        | 
|---------------------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | 
|                       | By | /s/ Jeffrey
 K. Berg                   | 
|                       |    | Jeffrey K.
 Berg                      
|Date: August
 10, 2010 |    | President
 and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |    |                                       
|                       | By | /s/ David T.
 McGraw                   | 
|                       |    | David T.
 McGraw                      
|                       |    | Chief Financial
 Officer              
|Date: August
 10, 2010 |    |                                       

28

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,026,776
<SECURITIES>                                 1,353,733
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,087,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                   108,842
<INVENTORY>                                  6,871,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,112,770
<PP&E>                                      32,951,885
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,248,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,816,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,392,736
<BONDS>                                        900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,138,096
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,067,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,816,533
<SALES>                                     12,372,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,435,736
<CGS>                                        8,892,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,892,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,146,084
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,412,435
<INCOME-TAX>                                   491,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            921,435
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   921,435
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81


</TABLE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Share with Youth: A Friend of a Friend Might Be a Scammer      

# Share with Youth: A Friend of a Friend Might Be a Scammer

This article describes a scam known as “farcing,” in which users receive a friend request from someone with whom they supposedly share mutual friends, only to have the scammer collect their personal data. It also provides tips for identity protection when using social media. 

http://www.usa.gov/features?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources#item-211756
#### § 1005.11 [Reserved]
9905.506-40 Fundamental requirement. ( a ) Educational institutions shall use their fiscal year as their cost accounting period, except that: ( 1 ) Costs of an indirect function which exists for only a part of a cost accounting period may be allocated to cost objectives of that same part of the period as provided in 9905.506-50(a).
( 2 ) An annual period other than the fiscal year may, as provided in 9905.506-50(d), be used as the cost accounting period if its use is an established practice of the institution.
( 3 ) A transitional cost accounting period other than a year shall be used whenever a change of fiscal year occurs.
( b ) An institution shall follow consistent practices in the selection of the cost accounting period or periods in which any types of expense and any types of adjustment to expense (including prior-period adjustments) are accumulated and allocated.
( c ) The same cost accounting period shall be used for accumulating costs in an indirect cost pool as for establishing its allocation base, except that the contracting parties may agree to use a different period for establishing an allocation base as provided in 9905.506-50(e).
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of American Southwest Music Distribution,
      Inc., a Delaware corporation f/k/a GL Energy & Exploration, Inc., (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending April 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      David Michery, President of the Company, certify the following pursuant to
      Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







/s/
      David Michery


David
      Michery


President


Sptember
      20, 2006
##### 



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Bruce S. MacDonaldBruce S. MacDonaldChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6274

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LARRY RANDALL BULLOCK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CR-91-66)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 6, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bridgett Britt Aguirre, Fuquay-Varina, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Janice McKenzie Cole, United States Attorney, David J.

Cortes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Randall Bullock appeals from a district court order

denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion for reduction of his

sentence. We dismiss the appeal.

It is uncontested that Bullock's initial sentence was within

the range set by the federal sentencing guidelines. The order denying Bullock's Rule 35 motion is not appealable. See United States

v. Pridgen, 64 F.3d 147, 149-50 (4th Cir. 1995). Because the district court's decision on the Rule 35 motion is not appealable,

Bullock's argument regarding the district court's discrepancy

between its oral pronouncement to grant the motion but reserving

for later decision the amount of departure and the written order

denying the motion is not subject to review by this court.

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Promising Practices for Integrated Education and Training Programs That Serve Beginning-Level Learners      

# Resource: Promising Practices for Integrated Education and Training Programs That Serve Beginning-Level Learners

This brief (PDF, 12 pages) is the second in a six-part Integrated Education and Training (IET) Strategies in Action series that provides adult educators with a snapshot of the ways in which some IET programs have implemented promising practices to serve diverse student populations in a variety of settings. This brief describes how two strategies—bridge programs and stackable credentials—can help beginning-level learners access and succeed in IET programs. **Learn more** (PDF, 12 pages).