alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1001.30 Reports of receipts and utilization. Each handler shall report monthly so that the Market Administrator's office receives the report on or before the 10th day after the end of the month, in the detail and on prescribed forms, as follows: ( a ) Each pool plant operator shall report for each of its operations the following information: ( 1 ) Product pounds, pounds of butterfat, pounds of protein, and pounds of nonfat solids other than protein (other solids) contained in or represented by: ( i ) Receipts of producer milk, including producer milk diverted by the reporting handler, from sources other than handlers described in § 1000.9(c); and
( ii ) Receipts of milk from handlers described in § 1000.9(c);
( 2 ) Product pounds and pounds of butterfat contained in: ( i ) Receipts of fluid milk products and bulk fluid cream products from other pool plants;
( ii ) Receipts of other source milk; and
( iii ) Inventories at the beginning and end of the month of fluid milk products and bulk fluid cream products;
( 3 ) The utilization or disposition of all milk and milk products required to be reported pursuant to this paragraph; and
( 4 ) Such other information with respect to the receipts and utilization of skim milk, butterfat, milk protein, and other nonfat solids as the market administrator may prescribe.
( b ) Each handler operating a partially regulated distributing plant shall report with respect to such plant in the same manner as prescribed for reports required by paragraph (a) of this section. Receipts of milk that would have been producer milk if the plant had been fully regulated shall be reported in lieu of producer milk. The report shall show also the quantity of any reconstituted skim milk in route disposition in the marketing area.
( c ) Each handler described in § 1000.9(c) shall report: ( 1 ) The product pounds, pounds of butterfat, pounds of protein, and the pounds of solids-not-fat other than protein (other solids) contained in receipts of milk from producers; and
( 2 ) The utilization or disposition of such receipts.
( d ) Each handler not specified in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section shall report with respect to its receipts and utilization of milk and milk products in such manner as the market administrator may prescribe.
[64 FR 47954, Sept. 1, 1999, as amended at 70 FR 18963, Apr. 12, 2005]
§ 1.192 Documentation of fees and expenses. ( a ) The application shall be accompanied by full documentation of the fees and expenses, including the cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, project, or similar matter, for which an award is sought.
( b ) The documentation shall include an affidavit from any attorney, agent, or expert witness representing or appearing on behalf of the party, stating the actual time expended and the rate at which fees and other expenses were computed and describing the specific services performed. ( 1 ) The affidavit shall state the services performed. In order to establish the hourly rate, the affidavit shall state the hourly rate which is billed and paid by the majority of clients during the relevant time periods.
( 2 ) If no hourly rate is paid by the majority of clients because, for instance, the attorney or agent represents most clients on a contingency basis, the attorney or agent shall provide information about two attorneys or agents with similar experience, who perform similar work, stating their hourly rate.
( c ) The documentation also shall include a description of any expenses for which reimbursement is sought and a statement of the amounts paid and payable by the applicant or by any other person or entity for the services provided.
( d ) The adjudicative officer may require the applicant to provide vouchers, receipts, or other substantiation for any fees or expenses claimed, pursuant to § 1.199 of this part.
(May 13, 2004)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chrisalyn C. Nater, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 917]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered December 11, 2000, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of 3 to 6 years. Defense counsel now seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief leads to the same conclusion. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed, and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979 [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.P, Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           New Online Course from SAMHSA: Managing Anger      

# New Online Course from SAMHSA: Managing Anger

This free online course uses a cognitive behavioral approach to working with angry clients. This course covers a range of topics, including how people respond to getting angry, how to manage anger from people with traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder, and how to assess anger and readiness for anger treatment. The course may be useful for behavioral health service providers, human resource and other managers, school teachers and administrators, and professionals working in the criminal justice system.

http://beta.samhsa.gov/samhsaNewsLetter/Volume_22_Number_3/working_with_anger/?&utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 39 (Tuesday, March 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12255-12256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. Due to a 
processing error, we will not be able to meet the 15-calendar notice 
threshold, but this meeting will still be open. This meeting will still 
be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 9, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 
336-690-6217.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications 
Project Committee will be held Tuesday, March 9, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. 
Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure 
of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Conchata Holloway. For more

[[Page 12256]]

information please contact Cedric Jeans at 1-888-912-1227 or 336-690-
6217, or write TAP Office, 4905 Koger Boulevard, Greensboro, NC 27407-
2734 or contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The 
agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 24, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-04205 Filed 3-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### 752.232-70 Letter of credit advance payment.

As required by 732.406-73, insert the following clause in contracts being paid by Letter of Credit.

# Letter of Credit Advance Payment (MAR 2015)

(a) Payment under this contract must be by means of a Letter of Credit (LOC) in accordance with the terms and conditions of the LOC and any instructions issued by the USAID, Bureau for Management, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Cash Management and Payment Division (M/CFO/CMP).

(b) Immediately upon award, or as soon as the Letter of Credit payment method is approved by the contracting officer, contractors without an established LOC account must submit the following forms with original signatures, to the address specified below:

Forms:

(1) A signed original SF-1199A (Direct Deposit Sign-Up Form); and

(2) “Division of Payment Management Payment Management System Access Form” found at the Department of State and Human Services (DHHS) Web site.

Address:

ATTN: James DuBois,

U.S. Agency for International Development,

M/CFO/CMP—LOC Unit,

1300 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,

SA-44, Room 430-J,

Washington, DC 20523-7700.

Contractors must also submit the forms specified above electronically to *loc@usaid.gov.*

(c) As long as the LOC is in effect, the terms and conditions of the LOC and any instructions issued by M/CFO/CMP constitute the payment conditions of this contract, superseding and taking precedence over any other clause of this contract concerning payment.

(d) If the LOC is revoked, payment may be made on a cost-reimbursement basis, in accordance with the other clauses of this contract concerning payment.

(e) Revocation of the LOC is at the discretion of M/CFO/CMP after consultation with the contracting officer. Notification to the contractor of revocation must be in writing and must specify the reasons for such action. The contractor may appeal any such revocation to the contracting officer, in accordance with the Disputes clause of this contract. Pending final decision, payments under the contract will be in accordance with paragraph (d) of this clause.

(End of clause)

[79 FR 74999, Dec. 16, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 4209, Jan. 23, 2024]
#### PEOPLE v. FEDERAL BANK OF NEW York et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 23, 1906.)

Proceeding by the people of the state of New York against the Federal Bank of New York and others.

I. L. Bamberger, for appellant

Broadway Trust Co. S. F. Kneeland, for respondent Schlesinger.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
§ 1124.71 Payments to the producer-settlement fund. Each handler shall make payment to the producer-settlement fund in a manner that provides receipt of the funds by the market administrator no later than the 16th day after the end of the month (except as provided in § 1000.90). Payment shall be the amount, if any, by which the amount specified in paragraph (a) of this section exceeds the amount specified in paragraph (b) of this section: ( a ) The total value of milk to the handler for the month as determined pursuant to § 1124.60.
( b ) The sum of: ( 1 ) An amount obtained by multiplying the total hundredweight of producer milk as determined pursuant to § 1000.44(c) by the producer price differential as adjusted pursuant to § 1124.75;
( 2 ) An amount obtained by multiplying the total pounds of protein, other solids, and butterfat contained in producer milk by the protein, other solids, and butterfat prices respectively; and
( 3 ) An amount obtained by multiplying the pounds of skim milk and butterfat for which a value was computed pursuant to § 1124.60(h) by the producer price differential as adjusted pursuant to § 1124.75 for the location of the plant from which received.
[64 FR 47998, Sept. 1, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 82840, Dec. 28, 2000; 68 FR 7069, Feb. 12, 2003]
932.102 Description of contract financing methods. ( e ) ( 2 ) Progress payments based on a percentage or stage of completion may be authorized by the Head of the Contracting Activity when a determination is made that progress payments based on costs cannot be practically employed and that there are adequate safeguards provided for the administration of progress payments based on a percentage or stage of completion.
[61 FR 41708, Aug. 9, 1996]
970.1100-2 Additional considerations. ( a ) While it is not feasible to set forth standard language which would apply to every contract situation, language must be designed for inclusion in a management and operating contract to describe clearly the work being undertaken; the controls, as appropriate, to be exercised by DOE over the performance of that work; and the relationship contemplated between the parties.
( b ) The language shall also include the following with respect to subcontracting performance of the work described pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section: “The contractor shall, when directed by DOE and may, but only when authorized by DOE, enter into subcontracts for the performance of any part of the work under this clause.”
( c ) The provisions required in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall be set forth in the statement of work of the contract.
#### § 1005.80 Transportation credit balancing fund.

The market administrator shall maintain a separate fund known as the *Transportation Credit Balancing Fund* into which shall be deposited the payments made by handlers pursuant to § 1005.81 and out of which shall be made the payments due handlers pursuant to § 1005.82. Payments due a handler shall be offset against payments due from the handler.
#### 605.404 Release of long-range acquisition estimates.
**TKP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0324 KALEB EDWARD DANIELS ,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA ,

Respondent and Appellee . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee ’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including April 27 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 21 2023

03/21/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0324
632.402 General. ( b ) Advance payments shall be authorized sparingly. Contracting officers should consider the use of partial payments, fast payments, or more frequent payments as alternatives to advance payments.
( c ) ( 1 ) ( iii ) The authority to make the determination prescribed in FAR 32.402(c)(1)(iii) is delegated, without power of redelegation, to the head of the contracting activity (see 601.603-70). For acquisitions by overseas posts, the head of the contracting activity shall obtain the concurrence of the Procurement Executive before making a determination pursuant to this section.
[53 FR 26173, July 11, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 66764, Dec. 28, 1994]
#### 970.2770-1 General.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for implementing the National Competitiveness Technology Transfer Act of 1989, Public Law 101-189, (15 U.S.C. 3711 *et seq.,* as amended). The Act requires that technology transfer be established as a mission of each Government-owned laboratory operated under contract by a non-Federal entity. The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 expanded the definition of “laboratory” to include weapon production facilities that are operated for national security purposes and are engaged in the production, maintenance, testing, or dismantlement of a nuclear weapon or its components.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 26, 2017

Order 

Clerk

July 26, 2017

155864(56)

PAUL J. SMOKE, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 155864

v COA: 332434

Lenawee CC: 14-005044-CZ

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF RAISIN and

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF RAISIN BOARD 

OF TRUSTEES,

Defendants-Appellants.

___________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellants to extend the 

time for filing their reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if 

submitted on or before August 2, 2017.
##### 



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
of CNA Financial Corporation
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 filed
on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: April 27, 2007/s/ Stephen W. Lilienthal

Stephen W. LilienthalChief Executive Officer
2992898 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA S upreme C ourt C ause No. DA 20 - 0052 GARY AND CAROLYN KAUL ,

Plaintiffs and Appellants , v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY ,

Defendant and Appellee . **GRANT OF EXTENSION**

Appellee State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) has requested a 30 - day extension from June 5, 2020, up to and including July 6, 2020, to file its Response Brief in this matter. Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee State Farm shall have until and including July 6, 2020, within which to file its Response Brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court June 5 2020

06/05/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0052 

## FILED Bowen Greenwood CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA 06/08/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0052
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.16

        
                                  WESTELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The annual retainer for all non-employee directors is $36,000.  Annual retainers for committee chairpersons are as follows: Chairman of the Board (if non-employee) -$20,000; Chair of the Audit Committee-$10,000; and Chair of the Compensation Committee-$10,000. Annual retainers for the members of committees are as follows: Member of the Audit Committee-$5,000; and Member of the Compensation Committee-$5,000.  There is not separate compensation for meeting attendance.  In addition, all directors may be reimbursed for certain expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings. Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation for service as directors.  In addition, non-employee directors are eligible to receive awards under the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan.  On a director’s initial appointment date, non-employee directors are each granted 20,000 restricted shares with an annual grant thereafter of 10,000 shares to be granted upon election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, with the award vesting on the first anniversary date of the grant.
#### In the Matter of M. Richard Wynne, Also Known as Milton Richard Wynne, et al., Attorneys, Respondents. Solomon A. Klein, Petitioner.

—■ On November 23, 1966, upon the opening of the hearing which this court directed to be held in this disciplinary proceeding before a Justice of the Supreme Court, the respondent M. Richard Wynne, present with counsel, voluntarily suspended himself from the practice of law for the duration of the proceeding; and the hearing was adjourned. A criminal action was then pending against him in the Supreme Court, Queens County, based on the same facts involved in this proceeding; and he had pleaded guilty therein to the misdemeanor of misconduct by attorneys (Penal Law, § 273). Judgment of conviction thereon was thereafter rendered on February 2, 1967. On February 3, 1967 this court received a paper dated February 2, 1967 and signed by this respondent, which states that he thereby resigns from the Bar of this 'State and that such resignation is in pursuance of a promise made by him to the Justice presiding at the time of the rendition of the judgment of conviction in the criminal action. Respondent M. Richard Wynne was admitted by this court to practice as an attorney and counselor at law on December 21, 1938. The charges against him in this proceeding were, *inter alia,*that: (1) in prosecuting certain damage claims, he had used the names of other persons as the attorneys for the claim*841ants, without authorization therefor from said persons or the claimants; (2) he had impersonated said purported attorneys for such claimants in litigation; (3) he had submitted false and perjurious statements to the court in support of applications for approval of compromises of infants’ claims; (4) he had fraudulently uttered instruments, including insurance company drafts for payment of claims and various papers in legal actions, knowing that the names of such purported attorneys had been forged thereon; (5) he had attempted to suborn perjury; (6) he had failed to deposit clients’ settlement moneys into a special account; and (7) he had failed to file numerous statements of retainer and numerous closing statements in contingent fee negligence cases. The above-mentioned resignation of respondent M. Richard Wynne as a member of the Bar is accepted and directed to be Sled; the proceeding is severed so that it may continue separately against the other respondent; and it is ordered that the name of respondent M. Richard Wynne be struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective March 6, 1967. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur.