alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
                                                        ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  AmBase  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
A.  Bianco,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date:  July 28, 2008                     /s/ Richard A. Bianco
                                          ---------------------
                                          Richard A. Bianco
                                          Chairman, President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          AmBase Corporation
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange      

# Report: Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange

This report provides information on international students studying at higher education institutions in the U.S. and students from the U.S. studying abroad. Developed by the Institute of International Education, the report shows the number of international students at colleges and universities in the U.S. increased by 7% to a record high of 1,043,839 in the 2015-16 academic year, while U.S. students studying abroad increased by 3% to 313,415 students in the 2014-15 academic year. 

http://www.iie.org/en/research-and-publications/open-doors?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links#.WEh_ibIrLDe
#### Merchants and Manufacturers Securities Company, appellant, v. John Duffy and Mrs. John Duffy, also known as Margaret Duffy, appellees.

Gen. No. 34,589.

Opinion filed March 24, 1931.

Mort D. *So*Frank Goldberg, for appellant; Frank Goldberg and Jack Lasky, of counsel.

Harry D. Knight, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Kerner

delivered the opinion of the court.
**Exhibit 32-1** **Certificate    Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of    Title 18 United States Code**     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the quarterly    report on    Form 10-Q    of Exelon Corporation for the quarterly period ended    June 30, 2006, that (i) the report fully complies with    the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information    contained in the report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of    Exelon Corporation. /s/  John    W. Rowe    John W. Rowe
Exhibit
      32.2








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with
      the Quarterly Report of CSS Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for
      the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Clifford E. Pietrafitta, Vice
      President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Clifford E. Pietrafitta


Clifford
      E. Pietrafitta


Vice
      President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer


(principal
      financial officer)





February
      1, 2007
#### Noemi Velazquez et al., Respondents, v State of New York et al., Appellants.

[776 NYS2d 804]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered March 11, 2003, which ordered that a proposed administrative directive and notices clarify there would be no enforcement of any class member’s pre-1994 child support orders, and specify that receipt of public assistance or Supplemental Security Income constitutes relevant, significant but rebuttable evidence of indigency and inability to pay child support, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The permanent injunction against enforcement of the pre1994 orders was consistent with our prior affirmance of a 1995 order (226 AD2d 141 [1996], *appeal dismissed*88 NY2d 963 [1996], 90 NY2d 1007 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 808 [1998]). The meaning and import of the receipt of means-tested public assistance as rebuttable evidence of indigency and the inability of a noncustodial parent to provide support *(see Matter of Rose v Moody, 83*NY2d 65, 70 [1993], *cert denied sub nom. Attorney Gen. of N.Y. v Moody,*511 US 1084 [1994]) require some form of public notice.

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Daniel Connelly, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[775 NYS2d 918]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the unauthorized use of a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of opiates. The misbehavior report, together with the positive test results and testing procedure forms, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner’s guilt *(see Matter of Dziedzic v Goord,*305 AD2d 826 [2003]). Although petitioner now claims that the cold medicine he was taking could have caused a false positive, there was no indication that petitioner was taking any medication. Finally, even if preserved for our review, we would find petitioner’s challenge to the adequacy of the hearing transcript to be without merit.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., *905concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
§ 1.650 When and where will the hearing be held? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the hearing will be held at the time and place set at the initial prehearing conference under § 1.640, generally within 25 days after the date set for completion of discovery.
( b ) On motion by a party or on the ALJ's initiative, the ALJ may change the date, time, or place of the hearing if he or she finds: ( 1 ) That there is good cause for the change; and
( 2 ) That the change will not unduly prejudice the parties and witnesses.
WRITTEN CONSENT TO ACTICN WITHOUT MEETING
                          OF CENTURY LABORATORIES, INC.

 BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DIRECTOR'S RESIGNATIONS AND APPOINTING
                               TEMPORARY DIRECTORS

Pursuant  to  Article  2  section  7  of  the  Bylaws and DCA 8-141 (f), (i) the
following  action  is  taken  and  approved by the Board of Directors of CENTURY
LABORATORIES,  INC.  by  unanimous  written  consent  as  if  a meeting had been
properly  called  and held and all the directors were present at the meeting and
voted  in  favor  of  such  action;

RESOLVED,  that the Board of Directors of CENTURY LABORATORIES, INC. does hereby
accept  EDWIN  MENDLINGER and LOUIS BIRNER'S resignation as Directors of CENTURY
LABORATORIES,  INC.  effective close of business on August 18, 2000 as stated by
aforesaid  in  their memos to the Board of Directors dated August 18, 2000.  The
Secretary  of the Corporation is hereby instructed to notify MESSRS.  MENDLINGER
and  BIRNER  that  the  Board  has  accepted  their  resignations.

RESOLVED, that ROBERT BRYAN is hereby appointed to fill the vacancy on the Board
of  Directors  created  by  Edwin  Mendlinger's  resignation  and shall serve as
Director  and  Chairman of the Board until the next annual shareholders' meeting
starting  close  of  business  August  18,  2000.


IN  WITNESS  WHEREFORE,  the  undersigned,  being  all  the DIRECTORS of CENTURY
LABORATORIES,  INC.  have  signed  this  consent  on  the dates indicated below.


Dated:  August  10,  2000



By:/s/______________________________
   DIRECTOR:  EDWIN  MENDLINGER
   CENTURY  LABORATORIES,  INC.


By:/s/______________________________
   DIRECTOR:  LOUIS  BIRNER
   CENTURY  LABORATORIES,  INC.
#### 9904.401-60 Illustrations.

(a) The following examples are illustrative of applications of cost accounting practices which are deemed to be consistent.

| Practices used in estimating costs for proposals | Practices used in accumulating and reporting costs of contract performance |
| --- | --- |
| 1. Contractor estimates an average direct labor rate for manufacturing direct labor by labor category or function | 1. Contractor records manufacturing direct labor based on actual cost for each individual and collects such costs by labor category or function. |
| 2. Contract estimates an average cost for minor standard hardware items, including nuts, bolts, washers, etc | 2. Contractor records actual cost for minor standard hardware items based upon invoices or material transfer slips. |
| 3. Contractor uses an estimated rate for manufacturing overhead to be applied to an estimated direct labor base. He identifies the items included in his estimate of manufacturing overhead and provides supporting data for the estimated direct labor base | 3. Contractor accounts for manufacturing overhead by individual items of cost which are accumulated in a cost pool allocated to final cost objectives on a direct labor base. |

(b) The following examples are illustrative of application of cost accounting practices which are deemed not to be consistent.

| Practices used for estimating costs for proposals | Practices used in accumulating and reporting costs of contract performance |
| --- | --- |
| 4. Contractor estimates a total dollar amount for engineering labor which includes disparate and significant elements or functions of engineering labor. Contractor does not provide supporting data reconciling this amount to the estimates for the same engineering labor cost functions for which he will separately account in contract performance | 4. Contractor accounts for engineering labor by cost function, i.e. drafting, designing, production, engineering, etc. |
| 5. Contractor estimates engineering labor by cost function, i.e. drafting, production engineering, etc | 5. Contractor accumulates total engineering labor in one undifferentiated account. |
| 6. Contractor estimates a single dollar amount for machining cost to cover labor, material and overhead | 6. Contractor records separately the actual costs of machining labor and material as direct costs, and factory overhead as indirect costs. |
619.804-3-70 SBA Acceptance Under MOUs for Acquisitions Exceeding $150,000. ( a ) The SBA's decision whether to accept the requirement shall be transmitted to the contracting agency in writing within five working days of receipt of the offer.
( b ) The SBA may request, and the contracting agency may grant, an extension beyond the five-day limit.
( c ) SBA's acceptance letter should be faxed or e-mailed to the offering contracting agency.
( d ) If the offering contracting agency has not received an acceptance or rejection of the offering from SBA within five days of SBA's receipt of the offering letter, the contracting agency may assume that the requirement has been accepted and proceed with the acquisition.
( e ) The contents of the acceptance letter shall be limited to the eligibility of the recommended 8(a) contractor.
Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yava

pa

i

Ma

r

ico

Co

u

nty

pa

Co

u

nty

La Paz County Maricopa County

!"a$

!"c$

!"c$

!"a$

WhiteTank

Mountains

RegionalPark

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

BureauofLandManagement

PhoenixDistrictOffice

Phoenix,AZ

October2006

Note:TheBureauofLandManagement(BLM)

conductslanduseplanningonlyintheareasadministered

byBLM.BLMhasnoplanningauthorityunderthe

municipalorcountyplanninglegislationoftheState

ofArizona.

NowarrantyismadebyBLMfortheuseofthismap

forpurposesnotintendedbyBLM,ortotheaccuracy,

reliabilityorcompletenessoftheinformationshown.

SpatialinformationmaynotmeetNationalMapAccuracy

standards.Thisinformationmaybeupdatedwithout

notification.

±

?¿

?Â

Aã

?3⁄4

Iz

I}

Iv

Iv

Iz

Map3-8

AguaFriaNational

Monument/Bradshaw-

HarquahalaPlanningArea

VegetationType

051015

Miles

Interstate

MajorRoad

MajorRiver,StreamsorWash

Highway

AguaFriaNational

MonumentPlanningArea

BradshawHarquahala

PlanningArea

VegetationType

Creosotebush-BursageSeries

Desert(Scrub)Grassland

DouglasFir-WhiteFirSeries

EvergreenMixedSclerophyllSeries

MixedPaloverde-CactiSeries

PineSeries
#### 970.2702 Patent related clauses.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Reducing Intergenerational Poverty      

# Report: Reducing Intergenerational Poverty

This report examines how poverty passes from one generation to another, identifies potential policies and programs to reduce it, and makes recommendations to address gaps in data and research. **Learn more.**
§ 1.625 How will the Forest Service respond to any hearing requests? ( a ) *General.* NFS will determine whether to answer any hearing request under § 1.621 on behalf of the Forest Service.
( b ) *Content.* If NFS answers a hearing request: ( 1 ) For each of the numbered factual issues listed under § 1.621(b)(1), NFS's answer must explain the Forest Service's position with respect to the issues of material fact raised by the requester, including one or more of the following statements as appropriate: ( i ) That the Forest Service is willing to stipulate to the facts as alleged by the requester;
( ii ) That the Forest Service believes the issue listed by the requester is not a factual issue, explaining the basis for such belief;
( iii ) That the Forest Service believes the issue listed by the requester is not material, explaining the basis for such belief; or
( iv ) That the Forest Service agrees that the issue is factual, material, and in dispute.
( 2 ) NFS's answer must also indicate whether the hearing request will be consolidated with one or more other hearing requests under § 1.623 and, if so: ( i ) Identify any other hearing request that will be consolidated with this hearing request; and
( ii ) State which Department will conduct the hearing and provide contact information for the appropriate Department hearings component.
( 3 ) If the Forest Service plans to rely on any scientific studies, literature, and other documented information that are not already in the license proceeding record, a copy of each item must be provided with NFS's answer.
( 4 ) NFS's answer must also indicate whether or not the Forest Service consents to service by electronic means under § 1.613(c)(4) and, if so, by what means.
( c ) *Witnesses and exhibits.* NFS's answer must also contain a list of the Forest Service's witnesses and exhibits that the Forest Service intends to present at the hearing, other than solely for impeachment purposes. ( 1 ) For each witness listed, the Forest Service must provide: ( i ) His or her name, address, telephone number, and qualifications; and
( ii ) A brief narrative summary of his or her expected testimony.
( 2 ) For each exhibit listed, the Forest Service must specify whether it is in the license proceeding record.
( d ) *Page limits.* ( 1 ) For each disputed factual issue, the information provided under paragraph (b)(1) of this section may not exceed two pages.
( 2 ) For each witness, the information provided under paragraph (c)(1) of this section may not exceed one page.
( e ) *Notice in lieu of answer.* If NFS elects not to answer a hearing request: ( 1 ) The Forest Service is deemed to agree that the issues listed by the requester are factual, material, and in dispute;
( 2 ) The Forest Service may file a list of witnesses and exhibits with respect to the request only as provided in § 1.642(b); and
( 3 ) NFS must include with its case referral under § 1.623 a notice in lieu of answer containing the information required by paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if the hearing request will be consolidated with one or more other hearing requests under § 1.623, and the statement required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ramon Chimelis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries III, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  January 20, 2009

/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

President (Principal Executive Officer)