alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.78 Development of special working relationships. ( a ) *Preliminary.* Prior to the submittal of a script or the rendering of an agreement, assistance may be given by the Department or one of its agencies in outlining story plans, visits to field points, and other incidentals that will assist the producer in determining his course of action.
( b ) *Request for special working arrangements.* Once the decision is made to go ahead with an agreement, either the interested agency or the producer will make a written submission to the Director of Information, requesting that special working arrangements be established. ( 1 ) In submitting scripts prior or subsequent to executing a written agreement under a special working relationship four (4) copies of the completed script shall be submitted to the Director of Information or his designee, along with a statement of specific requirements and the anticipated production schedule.
( 2 ) No script will be used under a special working relationship without the specific approval of the Director of Information.
( 3 ) Upon approval of the script, the agency of the Department concerned with subject matter will endeavor to arrange for the desired assistance with the stipulations of this policy.
839.105-70 Business Associate Agreements, information technology-related contracts and privacy. In accordance with 824.103-70, contracting officers and contracting officer representatives (CORs) shall ensure that contractors, their employees, subcontractors, and third-parties under the contract complete Business Associate Agreements for— ( a ) Information technology or information technology-related service contracts subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) where HIPAA PHI is created, received, maintained, or transmitted, or that will be stored, generated, accessed, exchanged, processed, or utilized in order to perform certain health care operations activities or functions on behalf of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) as a covered entity (*see* 802.101 for the definition of information technology-related contracts); or
( b ) Contractors supporting other VA organizations which support VHA in this regard and which would therefore require Business Associate Agreements in accordance with 824.103-70.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 42 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 42

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 20, 2023

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
 approving the Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act 
                                of 2022.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
of the action of the District of Columbia Council described as follows: 
The

              

 Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2022 (D.C. 
Act 24-781), enacted by the Council of the District of Columbia on 
January 19, 2023, and transmitted to Congress pursuant to section 
602(c)(1) of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act on January 26, 
2023.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Jose Fernandez, Respondent, v Mark Andy, Inc., Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 305]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J), dated January 14, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated May 8, 2003, as denied that branch of its motion which was for leave to reargue the prior motion.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated May 8, 2003, as denied that branch of the motion which was for leave to reargue is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

*485Ordered that the order dated January 14, 2003, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment solely on the ground that it was untimely pursuant to CPLR 3212 (a), having been filed 122 days after the plaintiff filed his note of issue *(see Krash v Bishop-Sanzari, J.V.,*309 AD2d 788 [2003]; *Jerry v New York City Hous. Auth.,*285 AD2d 531 [2001]). In light of the de minimis delay of two days, the plaintiffs failure to object to the motion as untimely, and the lack of prejudice to the plaintiff, the Supreme Court should have decided the motion on the merits *(see Burns v Gonzalez,*307 AD2d 863 [2003]; *Medina v Barbara,*279 AD2d 615 [2001]).

On the merits, however, the motion for summary judgment was properly denied. The law is clear that “a manufacturer of a product may not be cast in damages, either on a strict products liability or negligence cause of action, where, after the product leaves the possession and control of the manufacturer, there is a subsequent modification which substantially alters the product and is the proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries” *(Robinson v Reed-Prentice Div. of Package Mach. Co.,*49 NY2d 471, 475 [1980]).

The defendant demonstrated that the label press at issue was manufactured and distributed with safety guards which would have prevented the plaintiff’s injuries had they not been removed. However, there was also evidence that the safety guards were easily removable and that the label press was operable without them. Thus, an issue of fact exists as to whether the label press was purposefully manufactured to permit its use without the safety guards *(see Tuesca v Rando Mach. Corp.,*89 NY2d 966 [1997], *affg*226 AD2d 157 [1996]; *Lopez v Precision Papers,*67 NY2d 871 [1986], *affg*107 AD2d 667 [1985]; *Eiss v Sears, Roebuck & Co.,*275 AD2d 919 [2000]; *Smith v Day Co.,*242 AD2d 394 [1997]; *Ayala v V & O Press Co.,*126 AD2d 229 [1987]). Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shawn Mazique, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 576]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 10, 2003 *(People v Mazique*302 AD2d 479 [2003]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 20, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General      

# Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General

This section of the Youth Violence report lists descriptions of specific programs that meet standards for model and promising categories

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44294/
#### § 1006.42 Classification of transfers and diversions.

See § 1000.42.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of Vermont Pure Holdings, Ltd.
Watertown, Connecticut

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-95908, 333-64044, 333-100310, 333-109882 and 333-118228 on Form S-8 of our
report dated January 26, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Vermont Pure Holdings, Ltd. For the year ended October 31, 2005.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
January 27, 2006
##### 



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Peter K. BakerPeter K. BakerChief Executive Officer
§ 1.112 Procedures for requests pertaining to individual records in a record system. ( a ) Any individual who wishes to be notified if a system of records maintained by an agency contains any record pertaining to him or her, or to request access to such records, shall submit a written request in accordance with the instructions set forth in the system notice for that system of records. This request shall include: ( 1 ) The name of the individual making the request;
( 2 ) The name of the system of records (as set forth in the system notice to which the request relates);
( 3 ) Any other information specified in the system notice; and
( 4 ) When the request is one for access, a statement as to whether the requester desires to make a personal inspection of the records, or be supplied with copies by mail.
( b ) Any individual whose request under paragraph (a) of this section is denied may appeal that denial to the head of the agency which maintains the system of records to which the request relates.
( c ) In the event that an appeal under paragraph (b) of this section is denied, the requester may bring a civil action in federal district court to seek review of the denial.
[40 FR 39519, Aug. 28, 1975, as amended at 62 FR 33981, June 24, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from the
Company's  consolidated  balance  sheet  at  June 30,  1997 and Consolidated
Statement  of  Operations  for  the  six months ended June 30, 1997, and is
qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1880
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   468
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2348
<PP&E>                                         4401
<DEPRECIATION>                                  547
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1288
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        171
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6202
<SALES>                                         305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                371
<CGS>                                            41
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (302)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (302)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (302)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.01)
        



</TABLE>
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:? U.S. DOT/FAA - Notice of proposed rulemaking Extension
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Workforce System Strategies      

# Workforce System Strategies

Workforce System Strategies is an initiative of the U.S. Department of Labor administered by the Employment and Training Administration, which provides an online, public archive of resources to make it easier for workforce practitioners, administrators, policymakers, and researchers to identify and implement effective practices based on existing research, and ultimately, to support improved outcomes for workforce system customers. The site highlights workforce strategies that are backed by a wide range of evidence such as experimental studies, implementation evaluations, and performance data, and can be searched by methodology, states, programs, and target populations, including youth workers.

https://strategies.workforcegps.org
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmen Sanabria, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 4, 1978, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, indictment dismissed, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50. A sale of more than one ounce of heroin to an undercover police officer gave rise to the charge on which the defendant was convicted. The sale occurred in the kitchen of defendant’s apartment, and it is this fact upon which the prosecution principally relied to establish defendant’s possession of the narcotics. The record discloses that defendant was helpful to the undercover officer in making arrangements leading to the sale. On the day in question, after she admitted the undercover officer and his partner to her apartment and guided them to the kitchen where two codefendants were present, the *697defendant proceeded to prepare coffee, standing several feet away from the others. According to the testimony of one of the officers, a plastic bag containing the narcotics was produced by a codefendant from his jacket pocket, it was handed to the officers, who examined it and placed it on the kitchen table. The defendant did not have actual possession of the narcotics at any time. No evidence was presented that the narcotics had been stored or otherwise located in her apartment. After consummating the sale, an officer handed $100 to the defendant and thanked her, in his words, "for arranging the sale”. The record is barren of any evidence tending to establish that the defendant exercised, or that she could have exercised, any dominion or control over the narcotics in any manner, notwithstanding the fact that the transaction took place in her apartment. That she was present, and that she accepted the officer’s $100 gratuity are insufficient, in light of all of the evidence, to support defendant’s conviction of possessing the narcotics with the intent to sell them. We find that although the sale occurred in defendant’s apartment, she did not and could not have exercised that dominion and control over the narcotics necessary to establish a constructive possession, and, therefore, her conviction must be reversed (see *People v Torres,*45 AD2d 1042; *People v Schriber,*34 AD2d 852). As defendant was acquitted of the other charges submitted to the jury, including criminal facilitation, the indictment must be dismissed. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Mangano and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1028 PLATE 52

300.

Oo

Eddy

& Island

Argonne Point@

51

oe

Clam
Lagoon

Kuluk Ba;
J,
{0}
98
“ve

Zeto Point oO

300 |

Yy

0

a fo
OU geet

g)
Ls

ee

45°

Ki oe
0.
( aS
s |\
(

Cape Kagigikak

; / C
Turret moi OF S
s A

‘Sharp Cape
300

<a

-300—__}

Oglala Point

Topography enlarged from
U. S. G. S. reconnaissance
map, Adak, Alaska, 1951

Adak Strait

T76°SO"
INTERIOR—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. WASHINGTON, D. c.
MR 7131

RECONNAISSANCE GEOLOGIC MAP, SOUTHERN ADAK ISLAND AND
KAGALASKA ISLAND, ALEUTIAN ISLANDS, ALASKA

Scale 1:125 000
2 0 a 4 6 8 10 Miles
Subaerial contour interval 200 feet; datum is mean sea level
S Submarine contour interval 60 and 300 feet; datum is mean lower low water
S
ae
3 6 =
S i > §
S zZ g iS}
z = 2
> a g& G; —
s z > , iC @
% a ed fb g a a
= Sea level
1000" pe
2000"
3000"
4000°

Geology compited 1956 by G. D. Fraser from surveys
1952-53 by H. F. Barnett, B. H. Bieler, G. D. Fraser
E.H. Meitzner, W. H. Nelson, R. A. Robie, G. L.

Snyder, and R. E. Wilcox

EXPLANATION

Qal

Alluvial deposits

\e

Andesite and dacite
Probably includes basalt in small dikes
and sills. Generally altered. Includes
some dikes older than gd

!

Granodiorite, quartz diorite,
and gabbro
In stocks, sills, and dikes

Mixed rocks
Contains Finger Bay volcanics, fb, inti-
mately injected by granodiorite,quartz
diorite, and gabbro, gd

fb

Finger Bay voleanics
Altered andesitic and basaltic pyroclastic
deposits and lavas; minor amounts of
pillow lava, volcanic wacke ,and argillite

Indefinite or gradational contact

ate ae.
U
Fault, showing dip

Dashed where approximately located, dot-
ted where concealed. U, upthrown side;
D, downthown side

etl

Crestline of anticline, approximately located
Dotted where concealed, queried where doubtful

Trough of syncline, approximately
located

Nea
Strike and dip of beds

Approximate strike and dip of beds

on,

Generalized trace of beds,showing
direction of dip

2

Strike of vertical joints

a4
Strike and dip of joints
Reo
Strike and dip of platy structure
4

Oriented septa or large tabular
inclusions

Xi
5
Location of analyzed specimen

TRUE NORTH
MAGN ik
TIC Nonty

APPROXIMATE MEAN
DECLINATION, 1959

Kagalaska Strait

Cabin Cove

QUATERNARY

TERTIARY (?)