alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Broadband Access Resources      

# Broadband Access Resources

## Who Are You?

The coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency public health emergency has greatly impacted our society – from changing how service providers and schools provide services as well as how families and children receive services or instruction. Programs have had to quickly change how they provide services and move to a virtual platform in order to interact with clients and families.

A 2020 Report from the Federal Communication Commission found that **18 million people**, including **7 million children**, lack internet access. The lack of a stable internet connection or appropriate devices limits who is able to access services delivered virtually. Low-income families and rural communities are disproportionately affected.

This information about available streams of funding for human services providers, educational institutions, and individuals and families to access broadband and devices has been compiled in response to the pressing need for connectivity and internet access in these times. While this is not intended to be a comprehensive resource, The National Telecommunications and Information Administration has a comprehensive guide to all federal funding opportunities for broadband on their website: BroadbandUSA (https://broadbandusa.ntia.doc.gov/new-fund-search)

If you have questions, feedback, or addition resources to be shared, please contact Emily Hopkins: Emily.Hopkins@hhs.gov.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>             THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                     INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10Q DATED
                     SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                     STATEMENTS
<MULTIPLIER>                1000

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                 SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                       149839
<SECURITIES>                 1203667
<RECEIVABLES>                96464
<ALLOWANCES>                 5254
<INVENTORY>                  2185
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             1626033
<PP&E>                       175831
<DEPRECIATION>               115248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               2323415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        293542
<BONDS>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>        0
<PREFERRED>                  5681
<COMMON>                     17711
<OTHER-SE>                   1392749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 2323415
<SALES>                      15932
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             355089
<CGS>                        10103
<TOTAL-COSTS>                283485
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>              58696
<INCOME-TAX>                 25200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          15231
<DISCONTINUED>               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>              0
<CHANGES>                    0
<NET-INCOME>                 15231
<EPS-BASIC>                .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                .36



</TABLE>
#### *Stewart vs. Jewell.*

Trespass,

Case Iff.

krror to the Clarke Circuit; George Shannon, Judge.

*Pleading. Allegation and proof. Statutes.*Inclosures..

Declaration.

Evidence.

instructions.

Verdict *and*judgment for defendant.

April 22.

Judge Owsley

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Stewart sued Jewell, and declared against him, for trespass in shooting a horse in his inclosure, which is alleged not to have been such as is required by the act of assembly in such cases provided.

At the trial, which was had upon pleadings which allowed every defence to the merits, evidence was introduced by both parties; that on the part of the plaintiff, conducing to prove the allegations of his declaration, and that on the part of the defendant, conducing to prove that he was not guilty.

After the evidence of both parties was through, the court instructed *the jury, that they*must find for’the defendant, unless they should find from the evidence, that the plaintiff’s horse was within the defendant’s inclosure at the time the defendant committed the trespass mentioned in the declaration by shooting the horse.

Under the instruction, the jury found a verdit for the defendant, and judgment was thereupon render»! ed against the plaintiff.

*111_ iq ¡n an ac_ tion under the jl“tuate’j°ra beastfinflicted by thedeEfficient in”" closures, the plaintiff fail cas^withfn1 the act, he “«y yet re?voer fortlle common, law.

Hanson, for plaintiff.

The question is, as to the correctness of the instruction which was given to the jury. Without proving that the horse was shot by the defendant within liis enclosure, the plaintiff could not, we apprebend, be entitled to recover the double damages given by the act of assembly for such trespasses, and if the instruction had only gone, to inform the jury, that without proof of the horse being shot by the defendant, within his enclosure,' double damages could not be recovered, we should have had no difficulty in sustaining the judgment. But. if in fact, the horse was shot by the defendant, though not within his enclosure at the time, he was undoubtedly guilty of a trespass, for which the plaintiff has not only a right to maintain an action, but fer which, if proved, he was, in this action, entitled to recover damages commensurate to the injury, notwithstanding he has declared as for a trespass committed within the inclosurc of the defendant.

The instruction was, therefore, erroneously given to the jury. The j'udgment must, consequently be reversed with cost, the cause remanded to the court ’ below, and further proceeding there had, not inconsistent with this opinion.
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased the week prior to October 25, 2022 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### None Available

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c ca les/

.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Department of Education "Dear Colleague" Letter on Braille      

# Department of Education "Dear Colleague" Letter on Braille

The Department of Education released a Dear Colleague Letter to provide information to states and agencies about the importance of Braille instruction, clarify when these services should be provided to students, help school teams understand the evaluation required to guide decisions about services, and highlight available resources that can help personnel meet the needs of students who are blind or visually impaired (PDF, 6 pages).

http://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/memosdcltrs/brailledcl-6-19-13.pdf
#### 915.200 Scope of subpart.

The 48 CFR subpart 15.2 is not applicable to Program Opportunity Notices for Commercial Demonstrations (See subpart 917.72) or Program Research and Development Announcements (See subpart 917.73).

[74 FR 36363, July 22, 2009]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                      11,721,399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               41,923,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,584,000
<INVENTORY>                                 74,306,042
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           129,534,061
<PP&E>                                     101,000,955
<DEPRECIATION>                              53,230,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             212,704,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,827,017
<BONDS>                                     97,036,837
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,804,143
<OTHER-SE>                                  72,587,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               212,704,784
<SALES>                                    210,399,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           211,465,062
<CGS>                                      157,129,834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              201,658,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,263,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,132,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,161,361
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,908,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,253,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,253,361
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vermont Pure
Holdings, Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended October 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best
knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

/s/ Timothy G. Fallon
---------------------
Timothy G. Fallon
Chief Executive Officer

Date: January 31, 2005
#### Lana & Samer, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Eric Goldfine et al., Respondents.

[776 NYS2d 66]

*301Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J), entered April 30, 2003, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In order to prevail on a claim for tortious interference with contract, it must be proven, among other things, that the contract would not have been breached but for the defendant’s conduct *(Cantor Fitzgerald Assoc. v Tradition N. Am.,*299 AD2d 204 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 508 [2003]). Plaintiffs, as assignee of a lease of equipment to Goldman, offered in evidence a letter from defendants’ attorney, dated January 27, 1998, directing Goldman to send all future payments under that lease to defendants, rather than to plaintiffs. When plaintiffs then directed Goldman to make the payments to them, he stopped paying altogether, citing confusion over these competing claims.

Other evidence at trial indicated, however, that Goldman had been quarreling with plaintiffs over the condition of the property since signing his premises lease in 1994. This dispute reached a boiling point around the time the competing claims arose between the parties over who should receive the payments under Goldman’s equipment lease. In fact, some two weeks prior to the letter from defendants’ attorney, Goldman had notified plaintiffs that he would not be paying any more rent on the premises because of the many landlord/tenant issues; indeed, by mid-January, the premises had been closed by the Fire Department due to various code violations.

In light of this evidence, it cannot be concluded that plaintiffs carried their burden of showing Goldman would have continued making payments under the equipment lease through the date of his business entity’s bankruptcy petition in December 1998, let alone until termination of that lease in 2005, “but for” the attorney’s letter. In fact, the evidence suggests that given the problems Goldman was having with the premises, he seized upon the dispute between plaintiffs and defendants as an excuse for not paying rent under the equipment lease, since he had already withheld payment of the rent due on the premises. Plaintiffs have thus failed to establish by any direct evidence that the equipment lease between plaintiffs and Goldman was actually breached as a result of defendants’ attorney’s letter *(see J.C. Klein, Inc. v Forzley,*289 AD2d 79, 80 [2001]). Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Williams and Friedman, JJ.
#### § 1.73 Responsibility.

The Director of Information or his designee will be the authority for the approval of special working relationships on the part of the Department of Agriculture and its agencies. The Director or his designee shall not commit the Department to such special arrangements without proper concurrence and coordination with interested agencies and approval by the appropriate Assistant Secretary or Group Director.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           SAMHSA's "Talk. They Hear You." Mom's Thoughts Video PSA      

# SAMHSA's "Talk. They Hear You." Mom's Thoughts Video PSA

This PSA video for SAMHSA's "Talk. They Hear You." campaign encourages parents to start an open dialogue with their children at a young age about drinking. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6q3KitOos4&utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THTE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of AmBase Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Ferrara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  November 9, 2010


/s/ John P. Ferrara


John P. Ferrara Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


AmBase Corporation
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT HAYKAZ KHANJYAN, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-72534 Age n c y No. A089-299-626 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 18, 2014 * * B e fore : ALAR C ÓN, O’ SC ANNLAIN, a nd FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Hayka z Kha

njy an, a native and c itiz e n of Arm e nia , pe titions for re v ie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng his a pplic at ion for a s y lum , withholding of re m ova l, a

nd re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Aga i nst Torture (“ C AT” ). W e have 

# FIL ED FEB 25 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide n c e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, a pply ing the sta

nda rds gove rning a d

ve rse c re dibility de te rm i nations c re ate d

by the REAL ID Ac t. S

hre s tha v . Holde r , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th C ir. 2010). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s a dve rse c re dibility de t e rm ination ba se d on the inc onsiste nc ie s re ga rding whe n pa

rty m e m be rs c a lle d Kha

n jy an, a nd whe n Kha

njy an fle d to his Aunt’ s house . Se e id. at 1048 (a dve rse c re dibility de te rm i nation re a sona

ble unde r the tota l ity

of c irc um sta

nc e s). Kha

njy an’ s c ha lle nge to the a ge nc y ’ s a dve rse c re dibility finding la c ks m e rit. S e e Shre stha , 590 F.3d a

t 1043-44 (unde r the REAL ID Ac t, “ [i] nc onsiste nc i e s no longe r ne e d to go to thehe art of the pe titione r’ s c la i m ” ). In the a bse nc e of c re dible te stim ony , Kha njy an’ s a sy lum

and withholding of re

m ova l c la im s fa il. Se e Farah v . Ashc roft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th C ir. 2003). Fina lly , Kha

njy an’ s C AT c la im

a lso fa ils be c a

use it is ba se d on the sam e sta te m e nts found not c re d ible , a nd he points to no othe

r e vide nc e in the re c ord to c om pe l the finding tha

t it is more like l y

tha n not he would be torture d by or with the c onse nt or a c quie sc e n c e of a public offic ia l in Arm e nia . Se e id. at 1156-57.

PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.
1 2 - 7 2 5 3 4 2
§ 1.331 Witnesses. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, testimony at the hearing shall be given orally by witnesses under oath or affirmation.
( b ) At the discretion of the ALJ, testimony may be admitted in the form of a written statement or deposition. Any such written statement must be provided to all other parties along with the last known address of such witness, in a manner which allows sufficient time for other parties to subpoena such witness for cross-examination at the hearing. Prior written statements of witnesses proposed to testify at the hearing and deposition transcripts shall be exchanged as provided in § 1.322(g) of this part.
( c ) The ALJ shall permit the parties to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( d ) A witness may be cross-examined on any matter relevant to the proceeding without regard to the scope of his or her direct examination.
( e ) Upon motion of any party, the ALJ shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses. This rule does not authorize exclusion of— ( 1 ) A party who is an individual;
( 2 ) In the case of a party that is not an individual, an officer or employee of the party designated by the representative; or
( 3 ) An individual whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of its case, including an individual employed by the USDA engaged in assisting the representative for USDA.