DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

BASE CLOSURE

AND

REALIGNMENT REPORT

VOLUME I 

PART 1 OF 2: RESULTS AND PROCESS

MAY 2005 

Preface

Volume I, Part 1 of 2 

This information has been assembled to support the 2005 Department of 

Defense recommendations for base closures and realignments inside the United 

States. 

 

 The Secretary of Defense transmitted his recommended closures and 

realignments to the 2005 Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission and 

to the Congress on May 13, 2005, and published them in the Federal Register on 

May 16, 2005, pursuant to Public Law 101-510, as amended. 

 Part 1 of 2 of Volume I of this report contains an overview of the process 

and summarizes the results. 

 Part 2 of 2 of Volume I contains the statutory recommendations, 

justifications, and process summaries that the Secretary of Defense transmitted to 

the Commission and the Congress. 

 The other eleven volumes of this report provide supporting documentation 

for the Department’s recommendations. 





 

i

Department of Defense 

Base Closure and Realignment Report 

Table of Contents 

 Volume I Department of Defense 

Part 1 of 2: Results and Process 

Preface 

Letter from the Secretary of Defense 

Table of Contents 

Chapter 1 Overview and Results 1

Chapter 2 Force Structure Plan 5

Chapter 3 Analytical Process 13

Chapter 4 Implementation and Reuse 27

Appendix A: Cross Reference: Recommendations to Installations A-1

Appendix B: BRAC 2005 Closure and Realignment Impacts by Economic Area B-1

Appendix C: BRAC 2005 Closure and Realignment Impacts by State C-1

Appendix D: Legislation D-1

Appendix E: Policy Memoranda E-1

Part 2 of 2: Detailed Recommendations 

Preface 

Section 1 Department of the Army Army-1

Section 2 Department of the Navy DoN-1

Section 3 Department of the Air Force Air Force-1

Section 4 Education and Training Joint Cross-Service Group E&T-1

Section 5 Headquarters and Support Activities Joint Cross-Service Group H&SA-1

Section 6 Industrial Joint Cross-Service Group Ind-1

Section 7 Intelligence Joint Cross-Service Group Int-1

Section 8 Medical Joint Cross-Service Group Med-1

Section 9 Supply and Storage Joint Cross-Service Group S&S-1

Section 10 Technical Joint Cross-Service Group Tech-1

 Index Index-1

Volume II Classified Force Structure Plan 

Volume III Department of the Army Report 

Volume IV Department of the Navy Report 

Volume V Department of the Air Force Report 

Volume VI Education & Training Joint Cross-Service Group Report 

Volume VII Headquarters & Support Activities Joint Cross-Service Group Report 

Volume VIII Industrial Joint Cross-Service Group Report 

Volume IX Intelligence Joint Cross-Service Group Report 

Volume X Medical Joint Cross-Service Group Report 

Volume XI Supply & Storage Joint Cross-Service Group Report 

Volume XII Technical Joint Cross-Service Group Report 
 

ii 
Chapter 1: Base Realignment and Closure Overview and Results 1

Chapter 1 

Base Realignment and Closure Overview and Results 

The Need for Base Realignments and Closures 

The national security environment in America--the threats it faces and its force to counter them--

has seldom been more dynamic. The military base structure from which our forces are 

organized, trained, equipped, and deployed plays an important role in ensuring mission 

effectiveness and efficiency. The Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) process provided a 

unique opportunity to reshape the Department’s physical plant, that is, its installations and 

associated weapons ranges, as well as the organization and stationing of its forces. 

General Process 

In 1988, 1991, 1993, and 1995, the Defense Department executed base realignments and closures 

through a legally specified process. That process, then and now, involves the President, the 

Defense Department, the Congress, an independent commission, and local communities. 

Through the BRAC process, the Defense Department evaluates its current stationing plan against 

multiple variables: the changes in threat, force structure, technologies, doctrine, organization, 

business practices, and plant inventory. By assessing similar facilities using a set of 

comprehensive criteria, the Department develops realignment and closure recommendations in a 

fair, consistent, and transparent manner. An independent commission reviews the Secretary of 

Defense’s BRAC recommendations and makes its own recommendations to the President. The 

President, in turn, reports his decision on the recommendations to the Congress for its review and 

approval. Both the President and the Congress are limited to accepting or rejecting the entire 

package of the Commission’s recommendations. 

Related Studies 

As in previous BRAC rounds, the statutory focus for BRAC 2005 was on military installations 

and activities within the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 

Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and any other commonwealth, territory, or 

possession of the United States. The closure or realignment of military bases in foreign locations 

proceeds under a different, bilateral approval process between the United States and the host 

nation. Nevertheless, as in the early 1990s, changes in overseas basing and overall force 

projections affected BRAC 2005. 

Before the initiation of formal BRAC 2005 activities, the Secretary of Defense requested that the 

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs direct geographic combatant commanders to prepare draft overseas 

basing plans for their respective areas of responsibility. These drafts were part of a larger 

interagency assessment of the Department’s long-term overseas force projection and basing 
2 Chapter 1: Base Realignment and Closure Overview and Results 

needs. This assessment resulted in a series of recommendations that are included in the 

Department’s “Integrated Global Presence and Basing Study” (IGPBS), which is classified. That 

study outlined the recommended size, character, and location of our long-term overseas force 

presence. On the basis of the IGPBS results, the Secretary of Defense announced that some 

forces currently based overseas will return to the United States over a period of years. The 

Department’s BRAC analyses took into account all the basing recommendations of the IGPBS. 

In addition to the interagency study, under section 2912 of the BRAC statute, the Department 

conducted an analysis of its facility inventory to determine whether its excess capacity warranted 

another BRAC round. For this assessment, the Department used a parametric approach to 

compare 1989 base loading, using indicators of forces and infrastructure existing at that time, to 

the proportionate requirements of forces and infrastructure projected for 2009. From this study, 

the Department concluded that it had an aggregate 24 percent of excess capacity. On March 23, 

2004, the Secretary certified the need for an additional round of base realignments and closures. 

While the parametric capacity analysis was useful to assess the need for an additional round of 

base realignments and closures, the results of the analysis could not be used to project the 

number of potential BRAC realignments or closures that could be achieved in each installation 

category. The report’s methodology did not include a comparison of base capacity with specific 

need for that capacity. Nor did it include an assessment of particular characteristics of specific 

bases that are critical to assessing the relative military value of any specific BRAC option. 

Ultimately, specific BRAC recommendations are based on certified data regarding specific base 

capacity, the unique infrastructure needs of specific force elements or military functions, and the 

application of selection criteria that heavily weigh the military value of each installation 

considered for closure or realignment. 

In addition to the Department’s two studies, through the fiscal year 2004 Military Construction 

Appropriations Act (Public Law 108-132), the Congress created the Commission on Review of 

Overseas Military Facility Structure of the United States to provide Congress an independent 

assessment of the nation's requirements for overseas military bases. The Commission reported 

its findings on May 9, 2005. 

Process Characteristics 

The base closure process was designed in law to be objective, open, and fair. Each 

recommendation, rooted in the Department’s long-term force structure plan and installation 

inventory, was measured against eight criteria that were previously subjected to both 

congressional review and public comment. In developing the criteria, the Department, pursuant 

to statute, gave priority consideration to military value (criteria 1-4), then considered costs and 

savings (criterion 5), and finally assessed the economic impact on local communities, the 

community support infrastructure, and the environmental impact (criteria 6-8). Ultimately, these 

criteria were amended and codified in law. 

Each person submitting data for the BRAC analysis certified that the information was accurate 

and complete to the best of his or her knowledge and belief. The DoD Inspector General, the 
Chapter 1: Base Realignment and Closure Overview and Results 3

Service audit agencies, and the Government Accountability Office oversaw the Department’s 

procedures. 

The Department’s recommendations are the results of two and a half years of intense work. In 

his initial instruction in November 2002, the Secretary of Defense challenged the Department to 

use the opportunity of the BRAC authority to “reconfigure our current infrastructure into one in 

which operational capacity maximizes both war fighting capability and efficiency.” The 

Secretary directed that senior civilian and military leadership across the Department engage in 

this effort. 

As in the past, each Military Department analyzed and recommended ways to reshape its 

operational base structure to more effectively support its forces located in the United States. 

Seven joint cross-service groups scrutinized the bases and functions that constitute the 

Department’s common support infrastructure. They were challenged to look beyond Service 

boundaries to create joint basing options. The groups were organized around the following 

functions: education and training, headquarters and support, industrial activities, intelligence, 

medical support, supply and storage, and technical functions. For BRAC 2005, the chairs of 

these seven groups were empowered to formulate their own recommendations for the Secretary’s 

consideration. 

Process Results 

The Secretary of Defense initiated the BRAC 2005 process to rationalize the Department’s base 

infrastructure within the United States in support of the Department’s long-term strategic 

capabilities. The Secretary’s initial BRAC planning guidance, contained in a memorandum 

dated November 15, 2002, focused the BRAC effort on five key goals: 

• Transforming the current and future force and its support systems to meet new threats; 

• Eliminating excess physical capacity; 

• Rationalizing the base infrastructure with the new defense strategy; 

• Maximizing both warfighting capability and efficiency; and 

• Examining opportunities for joint activities. 

This package of recommendations advances all of these goals. The following themes emerge 

from the Department’s recommendations: 

• Support force transformation. Forces returning from overseas will be transformed 

through technology enhancements, capabilities-based restructuring, and basing that 

provides the needed training infrastructure. Support functions within both the Active and 

Reserve Army components will be reorganized into capabilities-based combat forces. 

• Rebase forces to address new threat, strategy, and force protection concerns. Dispersed 

forces and activities within the United States will be placed on more secure, militarycontrolled sites. This rebasing offers opportunities to increase combat power, enhance 

security, and promote efficiency while generating significant savings. 
4 Chapter 1: Base Realignment and Closure Overview and Results 

• Consolidate business-oriented support functions. Supply, maintenance, and medical 

functions will be consolidated to capitalize on proven, state-of-the-art business 

technologies and practices. Technical facilities, including research and development 

laboratories, will be consolidated to encourage better-focused investment strategies. 

• Promote joint and multi-Service basing. Joint activities will be established in key 

administrative functions and selected training missions. A joint training environment will 

be created for initial pilot training for the new Joint Strike Fighter. Other multi-Service 

basing will encourage integration and achieve economies of scale. 

• Achieve savings. The recurring and aggregate savings will almost equal the total savings 

of all previous BRAC rounds. Restructuring support functions will generate 

unprecedented savings. The reduction of support personnel and disposal of land and 

facilities are less predictive of savings. In comparing the one-time cost to the total net 

present value, the Department will realize two dollars in savings for every dollar in 

BRAC costs. 

While it is difficult to measure the full extent of the improvements in effectiveness and 

efficiency of the BRAC 2005 recommendations, the following statistics illustrate the breadth and 

depth of the impact of these actions: 

• Five percent of plant replacement value will be reduced; 

• About 12 million square feet of leased space will be vacated for more secure, functionally 

enhanced facilities; 

• About 18,000 civilian support positions will be eliminated; and 

• At the 6-year point in implementation, the Department will begin to realize annual net 

savings of over $5 billion from BRAC 2005 actions, in addition to about $7 billion from 

previous BRAC rounds. 

Conclusion 

BRAC is a powerful management tool for the Department. It invites a comprehensive, long-term 

review of the Department’s basing and offers a unique authority to reposition forces and 

reevaluate support missions. The rapidly changing national security threat and the evolving 

military response suggest that fundamental change will always be a part of the national defense 

mission. For this reason, the Department needs to conduct a BRAC review every five to ten 

years.
Chapter 2: Force Structure Plan 5

Chapter 2 

Force Structure Plan 

Introduction 

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff provided a long-term force structure plan for the 

Defense Department based on analysis of current and future threats, challenges, and 

opportunities and on the President’s national strategy to meet such circumstances. In accordance 

with Section 2912 of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, Public Law 101-

510, as amended, the force structure plan for Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) 2005 is 

based on the probable threats to national security for a 20-year period, from 2005 to 2024. In 

previous BRAC rounds, a similar requirement provided an assessment and projection of force 

structure for only 6 years into the future. It is important to note that this report focuses on a 

snapshot of force structure through Fiscal Years 2011 due to security classifications. 

An unclassified portion of the force structure plan is included in this report. The entire plan is 

classified and available through restricted distribution. The force structure plan does not reflect 

temporary adjustments to the force structure of one or another military service that the Secretary 

of Defense may make from time to time in response to unique but transient conditions. The 

Secretary of Defense submitted the force structure plan to Congress in March 2004 and provided 

a revised submission in March 2005 per Public Law 101-510. 

Strategy and Force Development 

The President’s National Security Strategy and the Secretary of Defense’s Strategy provide a 

new focus for U.S. military forces. These strategies require that U.S. forces, by their presence 

and activities, assure friends and allies of the United States resolve and the ability to fulfill 

commitments. Military forces must dissuade adversaries from developing dangerous 

capabilities. In addition, forces must provide the President with a wide range of options to deter 

aggression and coercion, and if deterrence fails, forces must have the ability to defeat any 

adversary at the time, place, and in the manner of U.S. choosing. 

Based on detailed analysis since the Secretary’s 2001 Quadrennial Defense Review, the 

Department of Defense has updated its strategic thinking, incorporating lessons learned from 

recent military operations. 

The Department’s planning has informed decisions to date on the force’s overall mix of 

capabilities, size, posture, patterns of activity, readiness, and capacity to surge globally. 

Just as strategy is constantly updated to incorporate and account for a changing global security 

environment, force planning standards also are adaptive and dynamic over time. 
6 Chapter 2: Force Structure Plan

The Department’s force planning framework does not focus on specific conflicts. It helps 

determine capabilities required for a range of scenarios. The Department analyzes the force 

requirements for the most likely, the most dangerous, and the most demanding circumstances. 

Assessments of U.S. capabilities will examine the breadth and depth of this construct, not seek to 

optimize in a single area. Doing so allows decision makers to identify areas where prudent risk 

could be accepted and areas where risk should be reduced or mitigated. 

The defense strategy requires the creation of new forms of security cooperation to support U.S. 

efforts to swiftly defeat an adversary with modest reinforcement. Specifically, security 

cooperation will underpin diversified, operational basing access and training opportunities for 

forward stationed forces, and strengthen U.S. influence with potential partners that could provide 

coalition capabilities for future contingencies. Security cooperation efforts will focus on 

activities to build defense relationships that promote U.S. and allied security interests, develop 

allied and friendly military capabilities for self-defense and coalition operations, and provide 

U.S. forces with peacetime and contingency access and en route infrastructure. 

Transformation To A Capabilities-Based Approach 

Continuous defense transformation is part of a wider governmental effort to transform America’s 

national security institutions to meet 21st-century challenges and opportunities. Just as our 

challenges change continuously, so too must our military capabilities. 

The purpose of transformation is to extend key advantages and reduce vulnerabilities. We are 

now in a long-term struggle against persistent, adaptive adversaries, and must transform to 

prevail. 

Transformation is not only about technology. It is also about: 

• Changing the way we think about challenges and opportunities; 

• Adapting the defense establishment to that new perspective; and 

• Refocusing capabilities to meet future challenges, not those we are already most prepared 

to meet. 

Transformation requires difficult programmatic and organizational choices. We will need to 

divest in some areas and invest in others. 

Transformational change is not limited to operational forces. We also want to change longstanding business processes within the Department to take advantage of information technology. 

We also are working to transform our international partnerships, including the capabilities that 

our partners and we can use collectively. 

Derivative of a transformational mindset is adoption of a capabilities-based planning 

methodology. Capabilities-based planning focuses more on how adversaries may challenge us 

than on whom those adversaries might be or where we might face them. It focuses the 

Department on the growing range of capabilities and methods we must possess to contend with 
Chapter 2: Force Structure Plan 7

an uncertain future. It recognizes the limits of intelligence and the impossibility of predicting 

complex events with precision. Our planning aims to link capabilities to joint operating concepts 

across a broad range of scenarios. 

The Department is adopting a new approach for planning to implement our strategy. The 

defense strategy will drive this top-down, competitive process. Operating within fiscal 

constraints, our new approach enables the Secretary of Defense and Joint Force Commanders to 

balance risk across a range of areas. 

We seek to foster a culture of innovation. The War on Terrorism imparts an urgency to defense 

transformation; we must transform to win the war. 

Addressing Capabilities Through Force Transformation 

The Department’s transformation strategy will balance near-term operational risk with future risk 

in investment decisions. It will invest now in specific technologies and concepts that are 

transformational, while remaining open to other paths towards transformation. Capabilities will 

be developed, supported by force transformation, which will allow us to meet the defense 

strategy while remaining open to explore new and essential capabilities. This force 

transformation will allow us to create a new/future force structure, which will move from its 

current platform-centric condition to a more capabilities-based and network-centric philosophy 

that addresses the full spectrum of conflict. It will allow the U.S. military to create conditions 

for increased speed of command and opportunities for coordination across the battlespace. 

Probable Threats To National Security 

Range of Challenges

Uncertainty is the defining characteristic of today’s strategic environment. We can identify 

trends but cannot predict specific events with precision. While we work to avoid being 

surprised, we must posture ourselves to handle unanticipated problems -- we must plan with 

surprise in mind. 

We contend with uncertainty by adapting to circumstances and influencing events. It is not 

enough to react to change. We must safeguard U.S. freedoms and interests while working 

actively to forestall the emergence of new challenges. 

The U.S. military predominates in the world in traditional forms of warfare. Potential 

adversaries accordingly shift away from challenging the United States through traditional 

military action and adopt asymmetric capabilities and methods. An array of traditional, irregular, 

catastrophic, and disruptive capabilities and methods threaten U.S. interests. 

These categories overlap. Actors proficient in one can be expected to try to reinforce their 

position with methods and capabilities drawn from others. 
8 Chapter 2: Force Structure Plan

Indeed, recent experience indicates that the most dangerous circumstances arise when we face a 

complex of such challenges. For example, our adversaries in Iraq and Afghanistan presented 

both traditional and irregular challenges. Terrorist groups like al Qaida pose irregular threats but 

also actively seek catastrophic capabilities. The government of North Korea at once poses 

traditional, irregular, and catastrophic challenges. In the future, the most capable opponents may 

seek to combine truly disruptive capacity with traditional, irregular, and catastrophic forms of 

warfare. 

Traditional challenges come largely from states employing recognized military capabilities and 

forces in well-known forms of military competition and conflict. While traditional forms of 

military competition remain important, trends suggest that these challenges will receive lesser 

priority in the planning of adversaries vis-à-vis the United States. This can be attributed, in part, 

to U.S. and allied superiority in traditional forms of warfare and the enormous cost to develop, 

acquire, and maintain conventional capabilities. But it is also explained by the increasing 

attractiveness of irregular methods, as well as the increasing availability of catastrophic 

capabilities. Even where adversaries possess considerable capacity in traditional domains, they 

often seek to reinforce their position with catastrophic, irregular, and disruptive methods and 

capabilities. Therefore, some strictly traditional or hybrid challenges require the active 

maintenance of sufficient combat overmatch in key areas of traditional military competition. 

Irregular challenges are characterized as “unconventional” methods employed by state and 

non-state actors to counter the traditional advantages of stronger opponents. Irregular methods 

of increasing sophistication -- including terrorism, insurgency, civil war, and third-party coercion 

-- will challenge U.S. security interests to a greater degree than they have in the past. Our 

adversaries are likely to exploit a host of irregular methods in an attempt to erode U.S. influence, 

power, and national will over time. 

Two factors in particular have intensified the rapid growth and potential danger of irregular 

challenges: the rise of extremist ideologies and the erosion of traditional sovereignty. 

Worldwide political, religious, and ethnic extremism continue to fuel deadly and destabilizing 

conflicts. Particularly threatening are those extremist ideologies that sanction horrific violence 

targeted at civilians and noncombatants. Areas in Central and South America, Africa, the 

Middle East, and South, Central, and Southeast Asia have provided havens for terrorists, 

criminals, insurgents, and other groups that threaten global security. Many governments in these 

areas are unable or unwilling to extend effective control over their territory, thus increasing the 

area available to hostile exploitation. Irregular challenges in and from these areas will grow 

more intense over time and are likely to challenge the security of the United States and its 

partners for the indefinite future. 

Our ongoing War on Terrorism and our resulting operational experience call for a reorientation 

of our military capabilities to contend with these challenges more effectively. 

Catastrophic challenges involve the acquisition, possession, and use of weapons of mass 

destruction (WMD) or methods producing WMD-like effects. A number of state and non-state 

actors are vigorously seeking to acquire dangerous and destabilizing catastrophic capabilities. 

States seek these capabilities to offset perceived regional imbalances or to hedge against U.S. 
Chapter 2: Force Structure Plan 9

.military superiority. Terrorists seek them because of the potential they hold for greater physical 

and psychological impact on targeted audiences. 

Porous international borders, weak controls over weapons-related materials and expertise, and 

ongoing revolutions in information technology are increasingly enabling this trend. Particularly 

troublesome is the nexus of transnational terrorists, WMD proliferation, and rogue states. 

Unchecked, this confluence raises the prospect of direct WMD employment against the United 

States or our allies and partners. Indeed, many would-be adversaries likely believe the best war 

to check American reach and influence is to develop the capability to threaten the U.S. homeland 

directly. Catastrophic attacks could arrive via a number of delivery means ranging from rogue 

use of WMD-armed ballistic missiles to surreptitious delivery through routine commercial 

channels to innovative attacks like those undertaken on 9/11. 

Elements of the U.S. national infrastructure are vulnerable to catastrophic attack. The 

interdependent nature of the infrastructure crests more vulnerability because attacks against one 

sector -- the electric power grid for instance -- would impact other sectors as well. Parts of the 

defense-related critical infrastructure are vulnerable to a wide range of attacks, especially those 

that rely on commercial sector elements with multiple single points of failure. 

The continuing illicit proliferation of WMD technology and expertise makes contending with 

catastrophic challenges an enduring necessity. A single catastrophic attack against the United 

States is an unacceptable prospect. The strategic effect of such an attack transcends the mere 

economic and social costs. It represents a more fundamental, existential threat to our nation, our 

institutions, and our free society. Thus, new emphasis must be applied to capabilities that enable 

us to dissuade acquisition of catastrophic capabilities, deter their use, and finally, when 

necessary, defeat them prior to their posing direct threats to us and our partners. 

Disruptive challenges are those posed by competitors employing breakthrough technology that 

might counter or negate our current advantages in key operational domains. In doing so, 

competitors seek to provide new military options that offset our advantages in niche areas and 

threaten our ability to operate from the strategic commons -- space, international waters and 

airspace, and cyberspace. Such developments will afford opponents only temporary advantage. 

In a few instances, however, the United States could confront technological breakthroughs that 

would fundamentally alter our approach to security. These might include, but are not limited to, 

breakthroughs in biotechnology, cyber-operations, space, directed-energy, and other emerging 

fields. Although such developments are unpredictable, we must be attentive to the consequences 

that such possibilities hold, and plan and invest accordingly. 

The goal of our transformation is to contend effectively with these challenges and channel future 

security competition in ways favorable to the United States and its international partners. We 

accomplish this by assuring our allies and friends -- demonstrating our resolve to fulfill defense 

commitments and protect common interests; dissuading potential adversaries from adopting 

threatening capabilities and ambitions; deterring aggression and coercion by maintaining capable 

and rapidly deployable military forces. Finally, at the direction of the President, we will defeat 

adversaries at the time, place, and in the manner of our choosing -- setting the conditions for 

future security. 
10 Chapter 2: Force Structure Plan

The Unclassified Force Structure Plan 

The following table shows the programmed force structure, manning, and funding for the Army, 

Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force for Fiscal Years 2005, 2007, 2009, and 2011. When 

reviewing this plan, it should be noted that it depicts only Service force units; that is, not all of 

the force structure is identified. For example, the unclassified version does not account for Army 

non-divisional units including its associated assets like aviation and special operations; Navy 

non-carrier-based aircraft and construction battalions; and Air Force airlift, special operation, 

tankers, and missiles. 
Chapter 2: Force Structure Plan 11

Service Force Units 

 FY05 FY07 FY09 FY11 

Army UEx 

 Active 6 11 13 13 

 Reserve 1 5 8 8 

Army Divisions 

 Active 5 

 Reserve 7 3 

Aircraft Carriers 12 11 11 11 

 

Carrier Air Wings 

 Active 10 10 10 10 

 Reserve 1 1 1 1 

Battle Force Ships 324 325 337 342 

Air Force AEFs 

 10 10 10 10 

USMC Divisions 

 Active 3 3 3 3 

 Reserve 1 1 1 1 

End-strength (k) 

 

 FY05 FY07 FY09 FY11 

USA* AC 482 482 482 482 

 RC 555 555 555 555 

USN AC 366 345 345 345 

 RC 83 71 70 70 

USMC*AC 175 175 175 175 

 RC 40 40 40 40 

USAF AC 360 356 350 350 

 RC 183 182 182 183 

* The Army projects it will end FY05 with end strength of 511,800 or 29,400 above the baseline of 482,400. The Marine Corps projects it will 

end FY05 with end strength of 177,675 or 2,675 above the baseline of 175,000. The FY05 Supplemental request includes $1.7 billion to support 

these overstrengths. In FY06, the Army and Marine Corps plan to exceed the funded end strength levels by at least 30,000 and 3,000 end 

strength, respectively. Both Services plan to seek Supplemental funding for any additional end strength above the baseline in support of the 

Global War on Terrorism. 

Anticipated Level of Funding ($B) 

 FY05 FY07 FY09 FY11 

USA 115 110.1 120.3 125.6 

USN 103.7 110.5 122.7 131.5 

USMC 18.9 18.5 20.6 21.9 

USAF 119.6 133.3 138.7 146.8 
12 Chapter 2: Force Structure Plan
 

Chapter 3: Analytical Process 13

Chapter 3 

Analytical Process 

Background 

Planning Guidance 

The Secretary of Defense’s memorandum of November 15, 2002, Transformation Through Base 

Realignment and Closure, initiated the Department’s BRAC process. The Secretary emphasized 

the need to eliminate excess physical capacity and transform the Department by rationalizing 

infrastructure with the defense strategy. This direction, along with later Department of Defense 

policy guidance, established policies, procedures, and authorities for selecting bases for 

realignment or closure. All U.S. installations, as defined by law, were considered equally. 

Copies of the Department’s policy memoranda are provided in Appendix E. 

 

Changes From Earlier BRAC Rounds 

The BRAC 2005 process differed in a number of ways from procedures established in earlier 

BRAC rounds. These changes reflect congressional requirements established in BRAC 

legislation as well as alterations in the Department’s analytical process designed to ensure the 

most comprehensive review of DoD’s infrastructure. Significant legislative changes include the 

following: 

• The Secretary of Defense was required to provide, with the Fiscal Year 2005 budget 

justification documents, a detailed report regarding the need for BRAC 2005. 

• The force structure plan must include a 20-year threat assessment rather than the 6-year 

threat assessment required in previous BRAC rounds. 

• Authority to proceed with BRAC 2005 was contingent on the Secretary of Defense’s 

certification that further base closures and realignments are needed and that such actions 

would result in annual net savings for each of the Military Departments beginning not 

later than Fiscal Year 2011. (The Secretary forwarded his certification to Congress in 

March 2004.) 

• Military value must be the primary consideration in making realignment and closure 

recommendations and factors related to other criteria must be addressed. (In prior rounds 

the Department made military value the primary consideration as a matter of policy.) 

• The Commission will have one additional member, totaling nine. 

• The Commission may add an installation to the Secretary of Defense’s list of 

recommended closures and realignments only if: 

 Seven of the nine Commissioners support the addition, 
 

14 Chapter 3: Analytical Process 

 At least two Commissioners visit the added installation, and 

 The Commission provides the Secretary 15 days to explain why an installation was 

not included in a BRAC recommendation. 

• The Commission shall invite the Secretary of Defense to testify at a public hearing, or a 

closed hearing if classified information is involved, on any of the Commission’s 

proposed changes to the Secretary’s recommendations. 

• Key dates, such as the nomination of members for the Defense Base Closure and 

Realignment Commission, were adjusted. 

• Regarding implementation and reuse of an installation, DoD is authorized no-cost 

conveyances but is directed to seek fair market value, as determined by the Secretary of 

Defense. 

• The Secretary of Defense may implement a closure through privatization in place only if 

that method of realignment or closure is specifically authorized in the Commission’s 

recommendations and is the most cost-effective method of implementation. 

BRAC 2005 Organizational Structure 

The Secretary of Defense’s November 15, 2002, memorandum, Transformation Through Base 

Realignment and Closure, established a separate governing structure to oversee and operate the 

Department’s BRAC 2005 process. The following chart illustrates this structure. 
 

Chapter 3: Analytical Process 15

BRAC Management Structure 

The Infrastructure Executive Council (IEC), chaired by the Deputy Secretary of 

Defense, and composed of the Secretaries of the Military Departments and their Chiefs of 

Service, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Under Secretary of Defense 

(Acquisition, Technology & Logistics) (USD (AT&L)), was the policy-making and oversight 

body for the entire BRAC 2005 process. This group ultimately shaped a coherent package of 

recommendations to present to the Secretary of Defense for his review and approval. The IEC 

met more than 20 times during the BRAC process. 

The subordinate Infrastructure Steering Group (ISG), chaired by the USD(AT&L) and composed 

of the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Military Department Assistant Secretaries 

for Installations and Environment, the Service Vice Chiefs, and the Deputy Under Secretary of 

Defense (Installations & Environment), oversaw the joint cross-service analyses of common 

business-oriented functions and ensured the integration of that process with the Military 

Departments’ analysis of all other functions. The ISG met more than 60 times during the BRAC 

process, setting milestones and resolving issues as the analyses unfolded. 

Joint Cross-Service Groups 

To facilitate a robust joint analysis during BRAC 2005, the Secretary of Defense chartered seven 

joint cross-service groups (JCSGs) to make realignment and closure recommendations related to 

common business-oriented support functions. The JCSGs, each of which had representatives 

from the Military Services, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and the Joint Staff, were 

chartered as analytical proponents with exclusive authority to make recommendations related to 

assigned support functions. Each performed a broad, comprehensive review of these functions. 

The final BRAC 2005 package illustrates that these JCSGs generated a significant portion of the 

overall recommendations. By contrast, during the BRAC 1995 round, joint analytical groups 

simply developed alternatives for consideration by the Military Departments. Few of these 

suggestions were included in the Secretary’s 1995 recommendations. 

 

The seven joint cross-service groups established for BRAC 2005 were: 

• Education and Training (E&T), 

• Headquarters and Support Activities (H&SA), 

• Industrial (IND), 

• Intelligence (INTEL), 

• Medical (MED),

• Supply and Storage (S&S), and

• Technical (TECH). 

A summary of each JCSG’s analytical process, along with its recommendations, is presented in 

Part 2 of this volume. Detailed JCSG reports are provided in Volumes VI-XII. 
 

16 Chapter 3: Analytical Process 

The Military Departments 

The Military Departments analyzed the remaining Service-unique or operational functions. A 

summary of each Military Department’s analytical process, along with its recommendations, is in 

Part 2 of this volume. Detailed Military Department reports are provided in Volumes III-V. 

Special Joint Teams 

During the BRAC analytical effort, the Department formed several teams to facilitate a common 

approach among analytical proponents. A Joint Action Scenario Team (JAST), chaired by the 

Army, was established to develop and manage the process for conducting joint analyses of 

Military Department-to-Military Department joint basing or joint use opportunities and scenarios 

that were outside the purview of the JCSGs. This advisory group tracked suggestions for the 

joint basing of operational forces and assisted Military Department analytical groups in assessing 

these opportunities. 

The Department also established four Joint Process Action Teams (JPATs). Each JPAT (named 

for the selection criterion on which it worked) was tasked to develop procedures, analytical tools, 

and databases to facilitate a common analytical approach to the four nonmilitary value selection 

criteria. JPAT 5 focused on the Cost of Base Realignment Actions (COBRA) model and was 

chaired by the Army. JPAT 6, Economic Impact, was chaired by the Office of the Secretary of 

Defense; JPAT 7, Community Infrastructure Impact, was chaired by the Air Force; and JPAT 8, 

Environmental Impact, was chaired by the Navy. The work of each JPAT is discussed later in 

this chapter. 

Government Accountability Office, Inspector General, and Other Groups 

The Government Accountability Office (GAO), the DoD Inspector General, and the audit 

agencies of the Military Departments played a key role in monitoring each phase of the BRAC 

analytical process. The GAO had full access to the Department’s non-deliberative meetings, 

briefings, proceedings, and analytical work. The Department provided the GAO the minutes of 

deliberative meetings once they were signed. This degree of access should assist the GAO in 

rendering its independent assessment of the Department’s BRAC process, as required by Public 

Law 101-510, as amended. 

In the latter stages of the BRAC analysis, the Department engaged a small group of executivelevel former government officials. Called the “Red Team,” this group was asked to provide an 

independent assessment of candidate recommendations. The team included: 

• The Honorable Hansford T. Johnson, General, USAF Retired, former Assistant Secretary 

and Acting Secretary of the Navy and member of the 1993 BRAC Commission; 

• The Honorable Robert B. Pirie, Jr., former Assistant Secretary, Under Secretary, and 

Acting Secretary of the Navy and former Assistant Secretary of Defense; and 
 

Chapter 3: Analytical Process 17

• General Leon E. Salomon, USA Retired, former Commander of the U.S. Army Materiel 

Command. 

The Red Team met with each Military Department and JCSG. It reviewed candidate 

recommendations, report drafts, and supporting materials. The team’s insights provided valuable 

feedback and suggestions for improving the quality of the candidate recommendation packages 

relative to the standard by which the Commission may alter the Secretary’s recommendations. 

Analytical Framework 

Public Law 101-510, as amended, requires that the Department base its recommendations on its 

20-year force structure plan, the inventory of installations and facilities provided to the Congress 

in March 2004, and the final BRAC selection criteria. The Department also established a set of 

overarching BRAC principles to guide the analytical process. 

20-Year Force Structure Plan 

The Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as amended, required the Department 

to develop a 20-year force structure plan as the basis for its BRAC analysis. This plan, provided 

previously to Congress, is based on an assessment of probable threats to national security during 

the 20-year period beginning with fiscal year 2005. It identifies the probable Military 

Department end-strength levels and the major military units needed to meet these threats, along 

with anticipated levels of funding available for national defense purposes during this period. The 

Military Departments and JCSGs used the force structure plan to guide their analyses and to 

develop candidate recommendations. 

As part of the assessment of probable threats to national security, the National Defense 

Authorization Act for 2004 requires the Department to “determine the potential, prudent, [sic] 

surge requirements to meet those threats.” The Military Departments and JCSGs incorporated 

surge assessments in multiple steps of their analyses. Each determined the surge capacities 

needed to support the Department’s force structure plan, evaluated the capability of assigned 

installations and facilities to surge, and incorporated these capabilities in their capacity 

assessments. During the military value analysis, analytical proponents evaluated infrastructure 

supporting their functions within the framework provided by the BRAC selection criteria. 

Criteria 1, “current and future” mission capabilities, and criteria 3, “ability to accommodate 

contingency, mobilization, surge, and future total force requirements,” capture the concept of 

surge. By appropriately weighting criteria attributes and metrics, Military Departments and 

JCSGs ensured that surge was appropriately reflected in military value analyses. Finally, during 

scenario analysis, proponents analyzed alternative infrastructure configurations within the 

context of the force structure plan and selection criteria. This analysis provided another 

opportunity to fully consider surge since it incorporated surge considerations made during the 

evaluation of capabilities necessary to support the force structure and capacity and military 

analyses. Policy Memorandum 7, Appendix E, provides additional information on the 

Department’s approach to evaluating surge requirements
 

18 Chapter 3: Analytical Process 

The classified force structure plan is Volume II of this report. An unclassified discussion of the 

force structure plan is included in Chapter 2 of this volume. 

BRAC 2005 Selection Criteria 

The BRAC 2005 statute directed the Department to provide draft selection criteria to the 

Congress and the public for a period of review and comment before final criteria could be 

adopted and applied in the BRAC analytical process. On December 23, 2003, the Secretary of 

Defense provided the Congress draft criteria and published them in the Federal Register for 

public comment. Following review of these comments, the Secretary published final criteria on 

February 12, 2004. The Congress later amended and codified these criteria in the National 

Defense Authorization Act for FY 2005. The final BRAC 2005 Selection Criteria follow: 

Military Value 

(1) The current and future mission capabilities and the impact on operational readiness of 

the total force of the Department of Defense, including the impact on joint warfighting, 

training, and readiness. 

(2) The availability and condition of land, facilities, and associated airspace (including 

training areas suitable for maneuver by ground, naval, or air forces throughout a diversity 

of climate and terrain areas and staging areas for the use of the Armed Forces in 

homeland defense missions) at both existing and potential receiving locations. 

(3) The ability to accommodate contingency, mobilization, surge, and future total force 

requirements at both existing and potential receiving locations to support operations and 

training. 

(4) The cost of operations and the manpower implications. 

Other Considerations 

(5) The extent and timing of potential costs and savings, including the number of years, 

beginning with the date of completion of the closure or realignment, for the savings to 

exceed the costs. 

(6) The economic impact on existing communities in the vicinity of military installations. 

(7) The ability of the infrastructure of both the existing and potential receiving 

communities to support forces, missions, and personnel. 

(8) The environmental impact, including the impact of costs related to potential 

environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance activities. 
 

Chapter 3: Analytical Process 19

Installation Inventory 

As required by Public Law 101-510, as amended, the Department submitted its inventory of 

military installations and facilities to the Congress in March 2004. The Department derived the 

inventory of owned facilities from the DoD’s Facilities Assessment Database (FAD), a resource 

updated annually from the real property records of the Military Departments. The Department 

owns more than 520,000 facilities (buildings and structures), of which about 87 percent are in the 

United States and territories. These real property records provided the basis for determining 

facilities subject to BRAC analysis. 

BRAC Principles 

To assist in the development of scenarios for base realignment or closures, the Department 

established the following BRAC principles. Policy Memorandum 2, Appendix E, provides 

additional information on the development of these principles. 

• Recruit and Train. The Department must attract, develop, and retain active, reserve, 

civilian, and contractor personnel who are highly skilled and educated and have access to 

effective, diverse, and sustainable training space to ensure current and future readiness, to 

support advances in technology, and to respond to anticipated developments in joint and 

Service doctrine and tactics. 

• Quality of Life. The Department must provide a quality of life, including a quality of 

workplace, that supports recruitment, learning, and training and enhances retention. 

• Organize. The Department needs its force structure organized, equipped, and located to 

match the demands of the National Military Strategy. These forces must be effectively 

and efficiently supported by properly aligned headquarters and other DoD organizations 

and take advantage of opportunities for joint basing. 

• Equip. The Department needs to retain, or make available within the private sector, 

research, development, acquisition, test, and evaluation capabilities. These functions 

must efficiently and effectively place superior technology in the hands of the warfighter 

to meet current and future threats and facilitate knowledge-enabled and net-centric 

warfare. 

• Supply, Service, and Maintain. The Department needs access to logistical and 

industrial infrastructure capabilities that are optimally integrated into a skilled and costefficient national industrial base that provides agile and responsive global support to 

operational forces. 

• Deploy & Employ (Operational). The Department needs secure installations that are 

optimally located for mission accomplishment (including homeland defense); that 

support power projection, rapid deployment, and expeditionary force requirements for 

reach-back capability; that sustain the capability to mobilize and surge; and that ensure 

strategic redundancy. 
 

20 Chapter 3: Analytical Process 

• Intelligence. The Department needs intelligence capabilities to support the National 

Military Strategy by delivering predictive analyses, warning of impending crises, 

providing persistent surveillance of our most critical targets, and achieving horizontal 

integration of networks and databases. 

Analytical Process 

During the BRAC 2005 process, the Military Departments and JCSGs followed a series of 

related, but separate analyses. These basic steps were capacity analysis, military value analysis, 

scenario development, and scenario analysis. Using these analytical elements, each proponent 

tailored its procedures to analyze its assigned installations and activities. The chart below 

provides a summary of this process. 

Capacity Analysis

To maximize warfighting capabilities and the efficiency of the current domestic infrastructure, 

each Military Department and JCSG began its analysis by determining the capacity of the 

installations and activities within its purview. The intent of this analysis was to develop a 

comprehensive inventory based upon certified data that included both physical capacity 

(buildings, runways, maneuver acres, etc.) and operational capacity (workload or throughput). 

Each proponent prepared a comprehensive capacity data call to meet its requirements. The 

groups’ task was to determine which bases and sites performed each function, how the physical 

and operational capacity at those installations was being used, whether surge capabilities would 

Military Value 

& Other Data 

Calls & Issuance

Capacity Data 

Call Dev 

& Issuance 

Capacity 

Analysis Scenario 

Development 

Scenario 

Analysis/ 

COBRA

Recommendations

 to Commission 

Military 

Value 

Analysis

Key Aspects of Process 

CAPACITY MILITARY VALUE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO ANALYSIS

Finalize 

Recommendations 

Selection Criteria 1 - 4 

• What’s important 

• How to measure 

• How to weight 

• Rank order 

• 20-year force structure plan 

• Capacity Analysis 

• Military Value Analysis 

• Transformational ideas 

• Guiding principles 

•Selection Criterion 5 – Potential 

Costs & Savings (COBRA) 

•Criteria 6, 7, 8 – 

Economic, 

Community, & 

Environmental Impacts 

 

 Inventory 

• What 

• Where 

• How Big 

• Usage 

• Surge 
 

Chapter 3: Analytical Process 21

meet contingency needs, and the maximum potential capacity at each location. Once the data 

call questions were completed, they were forwarded to the field by the Military Departments and 

Defense Agencies. Each group evaluated capacity analysis responses to identify opportunities 

for efficiency and effectiveness. 

Military Value Analysis (Criteria 1-4) 

As required by statute, the military value of an installation or activity was the primary 

consideration in developing the Department’s recommendations for base realignments and 

closures. The Department determined that military value had two components: a quantitative 

component and a qualitative component. The qualitative component is the exercise of military 

judgment and experience to ensure rational application of the criteria. This component is 

discussed further in the context of scenario analysis. The quantitative component, explained in 

greater detail below, assigns attributes, metrics, and weights to the selection criteria to arrive at a 

relative scoring of facilities within assigned functions. 

To arrive at a quantitative military value score, the proponents began by identifying attributes, or 

characteristics, for each criterion. The proponents then weighted attributes to reflect their 

relative importance based upon things such as their military judgment or experience, the 

Secretary of Defense’s transformational guidance, and BRAC principles. A set of metrics was 

subsequently developed to measure these attributes. These were also weighted to reflect relative 

importance, again using, for example, military judgment, transformational guidance, and BRAC 

principles. Once attributes had been identified and weighted, the proponent developed questions 

for use in military value data calls. If more than one question was required to assess a given 

metric, these were also weighted. Each analytical proponent prepared a scoring plan, and data 

call questions were forwarded to the field. These plans established how answers to data call 

questions were to be evaluated and scored. With the scoring plans in place, the Military 

Departments and JCSGs completed their military value data calls. These were then forwarded to 

the field by the Military Departments and Defense Agencies. The analytical proponents input 

the certified data responses into the scoring plans to arrive at a numerical score and a relative 

quantitative military value ranking of facilities/installations against their peers. 

Scenario Development 

With capacity and military value analyses complete, the Military Departments and JCSGs then 

began an iterative process to identify potential closure and realignment scenarios. These 

scenarios were developed using either a data-driven optimization model or strategy-driven 

approaches. Each approach relied heavily on the military judgment and experience of analytical 

proponents. 

The optimization models used by proponents incorporated capacity and military value analysis 

results and force structure capabilities to identify scenarios that maximized military value and 

minimized the amount of capacity retained. These models were also used to explore options that 

minimized the number of sites required to accommodate a particular function or maximized 

potential savings. As data results were analyzed, additional scenario options were evaluated. 
 

22 Chapter 3: Analytical Process 

A second, equally valid methodology of generating scenarios for analysis was driven by 

overarching Military Department or JCSG strategy. For example, the Headquarters and Support 

Activities JCSG identified a strategy objective that would reduce the number of single-function 

administrative installations. Scenarios identified by this method were verified against data 

collected in earlier capacity and military value analyses. Regardless of the initial approach to 

scenario development, qualitative or quantitative, all scenario proposals were refined through 

further analysis. 

Scenario Analysis 

During scenario analysis, proponents evaluated scenarios against selection criteria 5-8 and also 

looked again at military value, criteria 1-4. The overall scenario analysis process was 

characterized by an effort to identify options that best support force structure capabilities; 

enhance military value; provide, in the aggregate, significant infrastructure and/or cost savings; 

and are not limited by negative community, economic, or environmental consequences. 

For the second look at military value, each scenario was evaluated against the military value 

ranking discussed previously to assess how the scenario compared to the quantitative assessment 

of military value (i.e., does the scenario favor a location with higher quantitative military value 

over a location with lower quantitative military value). Decision makers also applied their 

military judgment and experience to assess the overall military value of the proposal. Once the 

decision makers determined that the scenario was consistent with or enhanced military value, 

they proceeded to evaluate the scenario against the remaining selection criteria, as further 

explained below. 

Determining Payback (Criterion 5)

Selection Criterion 5 requires the Department to consider the “extent and timing of potential 

costs and savings, including the number of years, beginning with the date of completion of the 

closure or realignment, for the savings to exceed the costs.” The analytical groups used the 

COBRA model to calculate estimated costs and savings associated with various alternatives. 

This model was used in previous BRAC analyses and was updated by JPAT 5. 

Although the COBRA model is simply an estimating tool, its principal strength is the uniform 

approach it applies to all competing scenarios. Its cost and savings estimates are not “budget 

quality,” but COBRA’s consistent methodology ensures that the financial implications of each 

competing scenario are analyzed in a uniform manner. The GAO has consistently cited the use 

of the COBRA model as effective for estimating costs and savings. In general, COBRAgenerated cost and savings estimates tended to prove conservative once more discrete, budgetquality assessments were accomplished early in the BRAC implementation phase. 

Section 2913(d) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as amended, 

requires the Department’s cost and savings criteria to “take into account the effect of the 

proposed closure or realignment on the costs of any other activity of the Department of Defense 

or any other Federal agency that may be required to assume responsibility for activities at the 

military installations.” By estimating the costs and savings to the Department of Defense 
 

Chapter 3: Analytical Process 23

associated with a proposed closure or realignment action, the COBRA model takes into account 

the effect of the proposed closure or realignment action on the costs of all DoD activities, 

satisfying the requirements of Section 2913(d) with respect to activities of the Department of 

Defense. 

With respect to determining the effect of the proposed action on the costs of “any other Federal 

agency that may be required to assume responsibility for activities” at a closing or realigning 

installation, the COBRA model is insufficient because it does not include estimates of non-DoD 

entity costs or savings. Furthermore, independently estimating the costs and savings to these 

agencies may be inadequate because such information is outside the control of the Department 

and therefore any effort to estimate these costs would be highly speculative. Additionally, the 

non-DoD agency may choose to relocate rather than remain and assume base operating 

responsibilities, potentially achieving savings that would skew any DoD cost estimates. 

Consequently, the Department cannot rely on the COBRA model or undertake independent 

estimates of the costs and savings to these agencies in order to take into account the effect on 

these costs and satisfy the requirements of Section 2913(d) with respect to non-DoD Federal 

agencies. 

In order to satisfy the requirements of Section 2913(d) with respect to non-DoD Federal 

agencies, when a scenario directly impacted a non-DoD Federal agency, the scenario proponent 

assumed that such agency will be required to assume responsibility for base operating activities 

on the military installation. The scenario proponent further assumed that because such agency 

will be required to assume base operating responsibilities it did not have before the proposed 

action, the effect of the action will be to increase that agency’s costs. The scenario proponent 

documented these effects for consideration by decisionmakers. 

Policy Memorandum 3, Appendix E, provides additional information on the Department’s 

approach to considering the costs and savings of its recommendations. 

Determining Economic Impact (Criterion 6) 

Selection criterion 6 requires the Department to consider the “economic impact on existing 

communities in the vicinity of military installations.” The Department used a certified database 

and calculator developed by JPAT 6 to assess the economic impact of closures and realignments 

on communities. The calculator, called the Economic Impact Tool (EIT), measured the total 

potential job change (direct and indirect) in the economic area or region of influence (ROI) of a 

scenario, and the total potential job change as a percentage of total employment in that region. 

To assist in assessing the relative economic impact of a scenario, the EIT also displayed the: 

• population and employment of the region of influence, 

• installation’s authorized manpower, 

• authorized manpower as a percentage of the region’s employment, 

• total job change (the sum of the estimated direct and indirect job changes), and 

• total job change as a percentage of the region’s employment. 
 

24 Chapter 3: Analytical Process 

Additionally, the EIT provided graphs displaying the total employment from 1988-2002, the 

annual unemployment rates from 1990-2003, and the per capita income during 1988-2002 for 

each region of influence. These graphs provided users a basis for assessing the relative impact a 

scenario might have on a local community’s economy. Policy Memorandum 6, Appendix E, 

provides additional information on the Department’s approach to evaluating economic impact. 

As the Department finalized its recommendations, decision makers reviewed the aggregate 

economic impacts to understand how all the actions encompassed in the BRAC 05 

recommendation package might affect a given ROI. 

Assessing Community Infrastructure (Criterion 7) 

Selection Criterion 7 requires the Department to consider the “ability of the infrastructure of both 

the existing and potential receiving communities to support forces, missions, and personnel.” 

Using procedures that JPAT 7 developed, the Military Departments and JCSGs examined the 

ability of both the existing and potential receiving communities’ infrastructure to support forces, 

missions, and personnel. The process required the evaluation of 10 key community attributes--

demographics, childcare, cost of living, education, employment, housing, medical care, 

safety/crime, transportation, and utilities. JPAT 7 created databases on each military installation 

for the Military Department and JCSG assessments. Policy Memorandum 4, Appendix E, 

provides additional information on the Department’s approach to evaluating Community Impact. 

 

As the Department finalized its recommendations, decision makers reviewed the aggregate of all 

recommendations in a community to assess the ability of the communities to support missions, 

forces, and personnel. 

 

Determining Environmental Impact (Criterion 8) 

Selection Criterion 8 requires the Department to consider the “environmental impact, including 

the impact of costs related to potential environmental restoration, waste management, and 

environmental compliance activities.” To assist the Military Departments and JCSGs in 

assessing these impacts, JPAT 8 obtained environmental data from all DoD installations and 

provided procedural instructions on a range of environmental assessment issues. 

Environmental Resources Impact To assess and consider the environmental resource impacts 

of different scenarios, JPAT 8 identified 10 environmental resource areas for consideration: air 

quality; cultural/archeological/tribal resources; dredging; land use constraints/sensitive resource 

areas; marine mammals/marine resources/marine sanctuaries; noise; threatened and endangered 

species/critical habitat; waste management; water resources; and wetlands. The Military 

Departments and the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) arrayed environmental data on these 

resource areas for each of their installations in an environmental profile. The profiles also noted 

the Fiscal Year 2003 estimate of the costs to complete restoration of sites managed under the 

Defense Environmental Restoration Account (DERA). 

Analytical groups used these profiles to assess each scenario. When a scenario appeared to merit 

additional review, the proponent requested a Summary of Scenario Environmental Impacts to 
 

Chapter 3: Analytical Process 25

evaluate impacts in the 10 environmental resource areas and identify any one-time waste 

management and compliance costs. The Military Departments and JCSGs then evaluated their 

scenarios in light of any identified impacts. 

Impact of Potential Environmental Restoration Costs. The Department considered the 

impact of costs related to potential environmental restoration through the review of certified data 

on preexisting environmental restoration projects at installations that were identified during 

scenario development as candidates for closure or realignment. In this regard, the certified data 

considered by the Military Departments and JCSGs included the Fiscal Year 2003 estimate of 

costs to complete for Installation Restoration (IR) sites managed and reported under the DERA. 

Under DERA, the costs are generally calculated on a “clean-to-current-use” standard. The cost of 

environmental restoration did not dictate any installation closure decision. The presence of 

DERA-managed sites, however, was considered as a land use constraint for installations 

receiving missions as a result of a potential realignment decision. 

Since the Department is legally obligated to perform environmental restoration whether a base is 

closed, realigned, or remains open, proponents did not consider environmental restoration costs 

in their payback calculations. Moreover the consideration of such costs could provide a perverse 

incentive that would reward (through retention) polluted sites and close clean sites. This 

approach was consistent with procedures used in prior BRAC rounds and responds to the 

Government Accountability Office (GAO) concerns. The GAO has stated that determining final 

restoration costs could be problematic before a closure decision, since neither reuse plans nor 

studies to identify related restoration requirements would have been initiated. 

Impact of Potential Waste Management and Environmental Compliance Cost. Any onetime waste management and compliance costs associated with closing a facility (e.g., costs 

generated as the result of operation permit termination requirements) or similar one-time costs 

associated with realignment actions (expanding treatment or compliance operation permits) were 

also identified for inclusion in the payback calculations. 

In addition to this overall effort to create environmental profiles of each installation that address 

major issues, the groups also asked scenario-specific questions about environmental issues at 

gaining and losing bases. The results are incorporated in their recommendations and 

justifications. 

It should be noted that the process for applying criterion 8 did not include an environmental 

assessment or impact study under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 USC 4321 

et seq.) (NEPA). Under the BRAC statute (Section 2905(c) of the Defense Base Closure and 

Realignment Act of 1990, as amended through the FY05 Authorization Act), the NEPA process 

is not triggered until the implementation of the BRAC recommendations. Rather, the 

environmental part of the BRAC process was an effort to efficiently package and analyze the 

certified environmental data, thus making it easily accessible to the Military Departments and 

JCSGs for integration into their analytical processes. Policy Memoranda 4 and 8, Appendix E, 

provide additional information on the Department’s approach to evaluating environmental 

impact. 
 

26 Chapter 3: Analytical Process 

As the Department finalized its recommendations, decisionmakers reviewed the summary of 

aggregate environmental impacts for each affected installation to assess whether the combination 

of all the actions encompassed in the BRAC 2005 recommendation package might generate 

environmental concerns that would need further review. 

 

Integrating Military Department and JCSG Recommendations 

In the final stages of the scenario analysis process, using its analysis against all eight selection 

criteria, each analytical proponent deliberated and decided which of its scenarios to recommend 

to the ISG and IEC for approval. Any scenario so recommended became a candidate 

recommendation. 

After the ISG and IEC completed their review and approval of individual candidate 

recommendations, the Department conducted a process of integration. Integration involved 

allocating costs and savings among candidate recommendations and combining multiple 

candidate recommendations into a single candidate recommendation where that would produce a 

complete closure or would make functional or strategic sense. All newly combined 

recommendations were then evaluated against selection criteria 5-8, as described above. 
Chapter 4: Implementation and Reuse 27

Chapter 4 

Implementation and Reuse 

When implementing decisions during the past four BRAC rounds, the Department worked 

diligently to assist its military and civilian personnel in transition, to transfer property for reuse, 

and to assist communities in converting surplus military installations to civilian reuse. The 

Department attempted to minimize involuntary separations of Defense civilians at closing or 

realigning installations through a variety of placement, retirement, and federal retraining 

programs. 

As a result of prior BRAC efforts, the Department has transferred over 450,000 acres of land and 

related facilities by deed or long-term lease to other entities for reuse. These transfers have 

permitted the creation of more than 110,000 new jobs, and redevelopment is continuing at those 

former installations. New job creation has continued to increase at an average annual rate of 

nearly ten percent over the past four years. In implementing BRAC 2005 decisions, the 

Department plans to assist community redevelopment, capitalizing on its previous experience 

and adapting to changing economic and market conditions. While some installations will close 

and others will experience job losses through realignment, other installations will expand to 

accommodate missions and relocated personnel. Relocations of missions and associated 

personnel were a significant aspect of BRAC 2005. 

Guiding Principles 

Out of its experience assisting communities during the implementation of previous BRAC 

rounds, the Department believes that the following principles will be particularly useful in the 

transition in communities supporting the Department’s mission: 

• Act expeditiously whether closing or realigning. Relocating activities from 

installations designated for closure will, when feasible, be accelerated to facilitate the 

transfer of real property for community reuse. In the case of realignments, the 

Department will pursue aggressive planning and scheduling of related facility 

improvements at the receiving location. 

• Fully utilize all appropriate means to transfer property. Federal law provides the 

Department with an array of legal authorities, including public benefit transfers, 

economic development conveyances at cost and no cost, negotiated sale to state or local 

government, conservation conveyances, and public sale, by which to transfer on closed or 

realigned installations. Recognizing that the variety of types of facilities available for 

civilian reuse and the unique circumstances of the surrounding communities does not 

lend itself to a “one-size-fits-all-solution,” the Department will use this array of 

authorities in a way that considers individual circumstances. 
28 Chapter 4: Implementation and Reuse 

• Rely on and leverage market forces. After four rounds of BRAC, both the public and 

private sectors are aware of the range of opportunities available for property reuse. A 

broad spectrum of practitioners has gained experience in all phases of base closure and 

redevelopment. This expertise should allow market forces to work effectively. 

Community redevelopment plans and military conveyance plans should be integrated to 

the extent practical and should take account of any anticipated demand for surplus 

military land and facilities. If installation growth is substantial, the Department will work 

with the surrounding community so that the public and private sectors can provide the 

services and facilities needed to accommodate new personnel and their families. 

• Collaborate effectively. Experience suggests that collaboration is the linchpin to 

successful installation redevelopment. Only by collaborating with the local community 

can the Department close and transfer property in a timely manner and provide a 

foundation for solid economic redevelopment. While BRAC sometimes challenges the 

existing supportive partnership between the installation and the community, both parties 

can benefit from the change if they continue to recognize themselves as partners whose 

individual interests in carrying out BRAC decisions are interrelated. Existing 

partnerships may need to expand to include state officials because of their environmental, 

historic preservation, and economic development responsibilities. Military-community 

partnerships need to be flexible enough to adapt to the specific market forces and other 

circumstances at each location. 

• Speak with one voice. The Department, executing disposal and reuse activities through 

the Military Departments and Defense Agencies, will provide clear and timely 

information through single focal points and will encourage affected communities to do 

the same. Timely information regarding facility and environmental conditions and 

closure and realignment schedules are critically important. In the past, when 

communities spoke with one voice about their reuse goals and activities, the Department 

was better positioned to consider local redevelopment plans. This was also true when 

installations and communities experienced substantial personnel increases. The 

Department recognizes that installation base commanders and local officials need to 

integrate elements of their growth planning so that appropriate off-base facilities and 

services are available for arriving personnel and their families. 

Information About BRAC 

The Department recognizes that BRAC decisions and their implementation are of high public 

interest. To keep information as current as possible, the Department maintains a BRAC 2005 

website (www.defenselink.mil/BRAC). The Department’s Office of Economic Adjustment 

(OEA) also maintains a website (www.oea.gov). Information on the OEA site could prove 

useful to local communities during their initial planning phases. 

Concerns about the implementation of BRAC decisions are numerous and based on very 

installation-specific circumstances. For many of these concerns, sufficient information may be 

available only after BRAC decisions are finalized and installation-specific implementation plans 
Chapter 4: Implementation and Reuse 29

are developed. The Department, however, has highlighted three particular areas for attention: 

assistance for personnel, environmental responsibilities, and assistance for affected communities. 

Assistance for Personnel 

One of the Department’s challenges at installations subject to BRAC decisions is the fair and 

effective management of human resources. The closure of installations with the potential for 

separating a large number of civilian employees presents major challenges to commanders and 

human resource personnel. While these installations will still have missions to accomplish, the 

employees will be stressed about their careers and employment security. In this atmosphere, 

productivity will suffer and the employees’ overall quality of life may diminish. The 

Department has a number of mitigating placement, transition, and worker assistance programs to 

draw from, including the following: 

• The Priority Placement Program provides for the referral and mandatory placement of 

displaced employees who are qualified for other vacancies within the Department. Other 

programs provide various types of referral and priority considerations for Defense and 

other Federal agencies’ job vacancies. 

• The Department’s permanent Voluntary Early Retirement Authority allows eligible 

employees to retire early and receive a reduced annuity. 

• The Voluntary Separation Incentive Program (with a cash payment) authorizes the 

Department to encourage displaced employees to separate voluntarily by resignation or 

retirement to avoid an involuntary separation of another employee. 

• The Department’s Homeowners Assistance Program provides financial assistance to 

relocating military and DoD civilians when they must sell their homes in a market that 

has been adversely impacted by a BRAC action. 

• The U.S. Department of Labor provides funding for assistance to displaced Federal 

employees. Under the Workforce Investment Act, assistance may include counseling, 

testing, placement assistance, retraining, and other related services. This assistance is 

available through the appropriate state employment security agencies. 

Military commanders and human resource personnel have learned from previous BRAC rounds 

the importance of stressing job placement and training to employees. When dislocations are 

likely to be large, establishing transition assistance offices at the installation encourages a strong 

partnership for providing the range of programs available from the Department of Labor and the 

Military Departments. 
30 Chapter 4: Implementation and Reuse 

Realigning and Closing Bases: Environmental Responsibilities 

The Department intends to transfer BRAC property expeditiously for reuse. However, the 

Department will comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires all 

Federal agencies to identify and consider possible environmental impacts of proposed reuse 

activities before transferring any real property. This analysis will also include the potential 

impacts on historical and cultural resources. While NEPA does not apply to the BRAC decisions 

themselves, the Act does require an environmental analysis for each installation receiving 

additional functions. Any mitigation that may be required will be identified and considered for 

implementation. 

The Military Departments are responsible for environmental remediation of closing installations. 

Early in the implementation process, the Military Departments will assess and document the 

environmental condition of all transferable property in terms of the extent of contamination and 

the current phase of any remedial or corrective action. 

If no remedial action on the installation is required, surplus real estate may be transferred. If 

remediation is required, the Military Department may complete the work before the transfer, or 

alternatively, with agreement from the affected community, the remediation to current use 

standards may be completed after transfer. Some property transfer negotiations have the new 

owner managing cleanup as a part of the redevelopment process. With regulatory concurrence, 

remediation and redevelopment activities may be integrated, potentially saving time and money. 

An ideal candidate for this type of transfer is property that has manageable environmental 

contamination, is readily marketable, and has community and regulator support. 

Assistance for Communities 

From a community’s perspective, BRAC actions take several forms -- complete closure, partial 

closure, realignment with a loss, and realignment with gains. Complete closure means the end of 

the military use of the property. Realignment actions, from a community view, take two distinct 

forms–either gaining or losing jobs. During a gaining realignment, a community will experience 

growth as it receives an additional military presence. On the other hand, a losing realignment 

action may mean reducing a large military presence in a community but not closing the 

installation in its entirety. In those cases, real property may become available for civilian reuse. 

From both the military and community perspectives, the challenges posed by losing scenarios, 

i.e., closures or realignments, differ from those posed by growth realignments. The 

Department’s Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA) is prepared to help a community adjust to 

a significant BRAC action whether a loss or a gain. Such assistance from the Department and 

other Federal agencies is designed to facilitate the organization, planning, and execution of 

community-based adjustment strategies. 

State and local officials may request OEA assistance. OEA maintains information on all aspects 

of local economic adjustment through a series of written documents, available on the OEA 

website–www.oea.gov. 
Chapter 4: Implementation and Reuse 31

Realignments With Growth at Receiving Installations 

 

Significant personnel increases at a military installation may substantially increase demands on 

community services and facilities. These demands could affect current residents. For example, 

off-base housing scarcity and over-crowded schools have been major areas of concern shared by 

both the military and the community. 

In a number of cases, the community will clearly be able to accommodate growth because the 

number and timing of arriving personnel is less than the community’s excess capacity and nearterm capability for expansion. This situation is not always the case, however. If questions arise 

regarding support capacity, OEA is prepared to assist communities in formulating growth 

management plans. 

An essential first step for the community is forming a partnership with the military installation so 

that information and expectations can be shared. The preparation of a growth management plan 

involves study and analysis as well as participation by community leaders so that growth 

strategies get the support necessary for implementation. The overall goal is to formulate and 

implement a community adjustment strategy so that the off-base impacts of significant military 

expansions can be accommodated in a timely manner. 

Closures and Losing Realignments 

BRAC actions can affect local communities in terms of reduced economic activity and job 

cutbacks. In the previous four rounds, many BRAC actions had a negligible effect on the 

surrounding community’s economy. However, over 100 BRAC actions significantly affected the 

local community, triggering a coordinated program of federal assistance from the Department of 

Defense and other Federal agencies. 

Jobs gained through the economic redevelopment of former installations can be critically 

important to mitigate the impact of BRAC actions. Civilian redevelopment is often the single 

most important opportunity for an affected community to overcome adverse impacts while 

building upon a community’s strengths and opportunities. 

To ease the economic effects on communities, the Department seeks to close installations as 

expeditiously as possible. This strategy makes property available for community redevelopment 

objectives and also saves DoD resources. For some communities, surplus military installations 

represent advantageously located real estate in the midst of rapidly growing and prosperous local 

economies. For other communities, opportunity may be difficult to recognize initially. No 

matter the situation, the redevelopment of a former military installation is often a complex effort. 

 

Because the needs of affected communities vary so greatly, the Department is prepared to assist 

communities in a variety of ways: 

• In terms of planning, the Department provides detailed information on the condition of an 

installation so that community redevelopment plans and potential users can identify 

baseline conditions and any required environmental cleanup needs. 
32 Chapter 4: Implementation and Reuse 

• While job creation, new business development, and tax-base expansion are common 

redevelopment goals adopted in communities, public use facilities may also be part of a 

base’s redevelopment. Federal property laws provide a variety of property transfer 

mechanisms to satisfy and support diverse redevelopment scenarios. 

• During the past four rounds of BRAC, OEA provided about $280 million in economic 

planning and redevelopment assistance to local communities. Other Federal agencies 

provided approximately $1.6 billion in coordinated grant assistance: Federal Aviation 

Administration ($760 million); the Commerce Department’s Economic Development 

Administration ($611 million); and the Labor Department’s Employment and Training 

Administration ($223 million). 

Redeveloping a military base becomes an opportunity for community leaders to reinvent the 

base’s usefulness and prosper from a diverse range of new civilian activities. The Department 

provides important assistance for reuse planning and property transfer. Other Federal agencies 

can provide additional help in acquiring and redeveloping base property. States have assisted 

community efforts with technical and financial assistance and direct participation in 

redevelopment efforts. Most importantly, closed bases find new life through the commitment of 

community leaders to create and sustain a widely shared vision for base redevelopment. 

The successful redevelopment of surplus military property does not occur without a genuine 

partnering between the Military Departments and the communities that will absorb the former 

installations. Likewise, it is important to recognize that this necessary Military-community 

partnership needs to be flexible to adapt to the specific market forces and private sector 

circumstances found at each location. Government agencies at all levels can bring critical 

knowledge and resources to this effort. The private sector’s entrepreneurial perspective and 

capital ultimately turn reuse visions into viable economic redevelopment and job creation. 
Appendix A:

Cross Reference: Recommendations to Installations by State

Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Alabama

Abbott U.S. Army Reserve Center Tuskegee

RC Transformation in Alabama Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 25

Anderson U.S. Army Reserve Center Troy

RC Transformation in Alabama Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 25

Anniston Army Depot

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 6

Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 4

Red River Army Depot, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 16

Rock Island Arsenal, IL Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 7

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Armed Forces Reserve Center Mobile 

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

BG William P Screws U.S. Army Reserve Center Montgomery

RC Transformation in Alabama Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 25

Birmingham Armed Forces Reserve Center

USAR Command and Control – Southeast Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 115

Birmingham International Airport Air Guard Station 

Birmingham International Airport Air Guard 

Station, AL

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 5

Dannelly Field Air Guard Station 

Birmingham International Airport Air Guard 

Station, AL

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 5

Great Falls International Airport Air Guard 

Station, MT

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 30

Fort Ganey Army National Guard Reserve Center Mobile

RC Transformation in Alabama Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 25

Fort Hanna Army National Guard Reserve Center Birmingham

RC Transformation in Alabama Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 25

A-1
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Fort Rucker

Aviation Logistics School Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 5

Establish Centers for Rotary Wing Air 

Platform Development and Acquisition, Test 

and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 26

Gary U.S. Army Reserve Center Enterprize

RC Transformation in Alabama Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 25

Maxwell Air Force Base

Consolidate Air and Space C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 6

Joint Center of Excellence for Religious 

Training & Education

Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 9

Mansfield-Lahm Municipal Airport Air 

Guard Station, OH

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 39

Navy Recruiting District Montgomery

Navy Recruiting Districts Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 34

Navy Reserve Center Tuscaloosa

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Mobile

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Redstone Arsenal

Co-locate Missile and Space Defense 

Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 15

Combat Service Support Center Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 6

Consolidate Ground Vehicle Development & 

Acquisition in a Joint Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 7

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Establish Centers for Rotary Wing Air 

Platform Development and Acquisition, Test 

and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 26

Fort Gillem, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 6

Fort Monmouth, NJ Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 11

Relocate Army Headquarters and Field 

Operating Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 46

The Adjutant General Bldg, Alabama Army National Guard Montgomery

RC Transformation in Alabama Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 25

Wright U.S. Army Reserve Center 

RC Transformation in Alabama Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 25

A-2
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Alaska 

Eielson Air Force Base

Eielson Air Force Base, AK, Moody Air 

Force Base, GA, and Shaw Air Force Base, 

SC

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 6

Elmendorf Air Force Base

Ellsworth Air Force Base, SD, and Dyess Air 

Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 43

Kulis Air Guard Station and Elmendorf Air 

Force Base, AK

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 7

Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID, Nellis 

Air Force Base, NV, and Elmendorf Air 

Force Base, AK

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 18

Fort Richardson

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

Kulis Air Guard Station 

Kulis Air Guard Station and Elmendorf Air 

Force Base, AK

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 7

Arizona

Air Force Research Lab, Mesa City

Defense Research Service Led Laboratories Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 22

Allen Hall Armed Forces Reserve Center, Tucson

RC Transformation in Arizona Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 28

Fort Huachuca

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Leased Space - AZ

Co-locate Defense/Military Department 

Adjudication Activities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 5

A-3
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Luke Air Force Base

Air Force Logistics Support Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 53

Fort Smith Air Guard Station, AR and Luke 

Air Force Base, AZ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 9

Hill Air Force Base, UT, Edwards Air Force 

Base, CA, Mountain Home Air Force Base, 

ID, Luke Air Force Base, AZ, and Nellis Air 

Force Base, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 47

Joint Strike Fighter Initial Joint Training Site Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 10

Marine Corps Air Station Yuma

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport

Birmingham International Airport Air Guard 

Station, AL

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 5

Arkansas

Camp Pike (90th)

USAR Command and Control – Southwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 117

El Dorado Armed Forces Reserve Center

RC Transformation in Arkansas Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 30

Fort Smith Regional 

Fort Smith Air Guard Station, AR and Luke 

Air Force Base, AZ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 9

Little Rock Air Force Base 

Air Force Logistics Support Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 53

Ellsworth Air Force Base, SD, and Dyess Air 

Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 43

General Mitchell Air Reserve Station, WI Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 52

Mansfield-Lahm Municipal Airport Air 

Guard Station, OH

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 39

Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station, NY Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 33

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Reno-Tahoe International Airport Air Guard 

Station, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 31

Schenectady County Airport Air Guard 

Station, NY

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 34

Stone U.S. Army Reserve Center, Pine Bluff

RC Transformation in Arkansas Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 30

A-4
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

California

Armed Forces Reserve Center Bell 

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Army National Guard Reserve Center Bell

RC Transformation in California Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 33

Beale Air Force Base

Beale Air Force Base, CA and Selfridge Air 

National Guard Base, MI

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 10

Camp Parks (91st)

USAR Command and Control – Southwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 117

Channel Islands Air Guard Station 

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Reno-Tahoe International Airport Air Guard 

Station, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 31

Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Oakland

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, San Bernardino

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, San Diego

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Seaside

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Edwards Air Force Base

Consolidate Air and Space C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 6

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Hill Air Force Base, UT, Edwards Air Force 

Base, CA, Mountain Home Air Force Base, 

ID, Luke Air Force Base, AZ, and Nellis Air 

Force Base, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 47

A-5
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Fort Hunter Liggett 

USAR Command and Control – Southwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 117

Fresno Air Terminal

Fort Smith Air Guard Station, AR and Luke 

Air Force Base, AZ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 9

Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID, Nellis 

Air Force Base, NV, and Elmendorf Air 

Force Base, AK

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 18

Reno-Tahoe International Airport Air Guard 

Station, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 31

Human Resources Support Center Southwest

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Leased Space - CA

Co-locate Defense/Military Department 

Adjudication Activities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 5

Co-locate Military Department Investigation 

Agencies with DoD Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 8

Los Alamitos (63rd)

USAR Command and Control – Southwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 117

March Air Reserve Base

March Air Reserve Base, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 11

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Marine Corps Base Miramar

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Joint Strike Fighter Initial Joint Training Site Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 10

Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow

Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 6

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Marine Corps Reserve Center Pasadena CA

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Moffett Field 

USAR Command and Control – Southwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 117

A-6
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Naval Air Station Lemore

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake

Create a Naval Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 15

Create an Integrated Weapons & Armaments 

Specialty Site for Guns and Ammunition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 19

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Navy Sensors, Electronic Warfare, and 

Electronics Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 28

Naval Base Coronado

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Naval Base Point Loma

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Create a Naval Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 15

Naval Station Ingleside, TX, and Naval Air 

Station Corpus Christi, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 26

Naval Base Ventura City

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Create a Naval Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 15

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Naval Support Activity Corona, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 7

Navy Sensors, Electronic Warfare, and 

Electronics Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 28

Naval Medical Center San Diego

San Antonio Regional Medical Center, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 10

Naval Station San Diego

Naval Station Ingleside, TX, and Naval Air 

Station Corpus Christi, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 26

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

A-7
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Naval Support Activity Corona

Naval Support Activity Corona, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 7

Naval Weapons Station Fallbrook

Create an Integrated Weapons & Armaments 

Specialty Site for Guns and Ammunition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 19

Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach Dat Concord

Create a Naval Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 15

Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 4

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center, Encino

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center, Los Angeles

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Onizuka Air Force Station

Onizuka Air Force Station, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 12

Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant

Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 5

U.S. Army Reserve Center Moffett Field 

RC Transformation in California Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 33

Vandenberg Air Force Base 

Onizuka Air Force Station, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 12

Portland International Airport Air Guard 

Station, OR

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 41

Vandenburg Air Force Base

Onizuka Air Force Station, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 12

Portland International Airport Air Guard 

Station, OR

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 41

Colorado

Air Reserve Personnel Center

Consolidate/Co-locate Active and Reserve 

Personnel & Recruiting Centers for Army 

and Air Force

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 33

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Buckley Air Force Base 

New Orleans Air Reserve Station, LA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 22

Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air 

Guard Station, OH,

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 40

A-8
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Fort Carson

Convert Inpatient Services to Clinics Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 12

Fort Hood, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 15

Leased Space - CO

Co-locate Military Department Investigation 

Agencies with DoD Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 8

Peterson Air Force Base

Co-locate Military Department Investigation 

Agencies with DoD Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 8

Ellsworth Air Force Base, SD, and Dyess Air 

Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 43

Schriever Air Force Base

Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station, NY Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 33

United States Air Force Academy

Convert Inpatient Services to Clinics Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 12

Connecticut

Bradley International Airport Air Guard Station 

Bradley International Airport Air Guard 

Station, CT, Barnes Air Guard Station, MA, 

Selfridge Air National Guard Base, MI, 

Shaw Air Force Base, SC, and Martin State 

Air Guard Station, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 14

Otis Air National Guard Base, MA, Lambert 

St. Louis International Airport, Air Guard 

Station, MO, and Atlantic City Air Guard 

Station, NJ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 25

SGT George D. Libby U.S. Army Reserve Center, New Haven

RC Transformation in Connecticut Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 35

Submarine Base New London

Create Joint Mobilization Sites Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 35

Submarine Base New London, CT Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 10

Turner U.S. Army Reserve Center, Fairfield 

RC Transformation in Connecticut Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 35

U.S. Army Reserve Center Area Maintenance Support Facility Middletown 

RC Transformation in Connecticut Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 35

A-9
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Delaware

Dover Air Force Base 

New Castle Airport Air Guard Station, DE Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 15

Walter Reed National Military Medical 

Center, Bethesda, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 4

Kirkwood U.S. Army Reserve Center, Newark

RC Transformation in Delaware Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 37

New Castle County Airport Air Guard Station 

New Castle Airport Air Guard Station, DE Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 15

District of Columbia 

Bolling Air Force Base

Co-locate Defense/Military Department 

Adjudication Activities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 5

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

Relocate Air Force Real Property Agency 

(AFRPA)

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 44

Leased Space - DC

Consolidate Media Organizations into a New 

Agency for Media and Publications

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 30

Relocate Miscellaneous Department of Navy 

Leased Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 49

Naval District Washington

Co-locate Defense/Military Department 

Adjudication Activities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 5

Co-locate Military Department Investigation 

Agencies with DoD Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 8

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Consolidate Sea Vehicle Development & 

Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 13

Navy Reserve Readiness Commands Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 44

Relocate Miscellaneous Department of Navy 

Leased Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 49

Potomac Annex

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

A-10
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Walter Reed Army Medical Center

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Submarine Base New London, CT Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 10

Walter Reed National Military Medical 

Center, Bethesda, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 4

Florida 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Orlando

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Eglin Air Force Base

Consolidate Air and Space C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 6

Create an Air Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 18

Fort Bragg, NC Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 10

Joint Strike Fighter Initial Joint Training Site Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 10

Homestead Air Reserve Station

Hill Air Force Base, UT, Edwards Air Force 

Base, CA, Mountain Home Air Force Base, 

ID, Luke Air Force Base, AZ, and Nellis Air 

Force Base, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 47

Richmond Air Guard Station, VA, and Des 

Moines International Airport Air Guard 

Station, IA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 50

Hurlburt Field

Air Force Logistics Support Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 53

Jacksonville International Airport Air Guard Station

F100 Engine Centralized Intermediate 

Repair Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 55

Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID, Nellis 

Air Force Base, NV, and Elmendorf Air 

Force Base, AK

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 18

Otis Air National Guard Base, MA, Lambert 

St. Louis International Airport, Air Guard 

Station, MO, and Atlantic City Air Guard 

Station, NJ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 25

A-11
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

MacDill Air Force Base

Beale Air Force Base, CA and Selfridge Air 

National Guard Base, MI

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 10

Convert Inpatient Services to Clinics Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 12

Grand Forks Air Force Base, ND Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 37

Naval Air Station Jacksonville

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Engineering Field Division/Activity Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 28

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Naval Air Station Brunswick, ME Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 18

Navy Regions Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 35

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Naval Air Station Pensacola

Co-locate Navy Education and Training 

Command and Navy Education and Training 

Professional Development & Technology 

Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 17

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Joint Strike Fighter Initial Joint Training Site Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 10

Navy Regions Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 35

Officer Training Command, Pensacola, FL Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 12

Submarine Base New London, CT Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 10

Undergraduate Pilot and Navigator Training Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 14

Naval Station Mayport

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Naval Station Pascagoula, MS Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 20

A-12
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Naval Support Activity Panama City

Consolidate Defense Information Systems 

Agency and Establish Joint C4ISR D&A 

Capability

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 27

Navy Reserve Center ST Petersburg

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Patrick Air Force Base

Consolidate Navy Strategic Test & 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 12

Tyndall Air Force Base

F100 Engine Centralized Intermediate 

Repair Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 55

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Langley Air Force Base, VA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 49

Georgia

Dobbins Air Reserve Base

General Mitchell Air Reserve Station, WI Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 52

Naval Air Station Atlanta, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 13

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Fort Benning

Fort Gillem, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 6

Maneuver Training Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 20

Single Drill Sergeant School Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 105

Fort Benning Bldg 15

RC Transformation in Georgia Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 39

Fort Gillem

Fort Gillem, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 6

Naval Air Station Atlanta, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 13

Fort McPherson

Fort McPherson, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 8

Inspector/Instructor Rome

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Leased Space - GA

Co-locate Military Department Investigation 

Agencies with DoD Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 8

A-13
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 6

Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 4

Red River Army Depot, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 16

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Moody Air Force Base

Eielson Air Force Base, AK, Moody Air 

Force Base, GA, and Shaw Air Force Base, 

SC

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 6

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Undergraduate Pilot and Navigator Training Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 14

Naval Air Station Atlanta

Naval Air Station Atlanta, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 13

Naval Supply Corps School Athens

Navy Supply Corps School Athens, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 14

Peachtree Leases Atlanta

Fort McPherson, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 8

Robins Air Force Base

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Consolidate/Co-locate Active and Reserve 

Personnel & Recruiting Centers for Army 

and Air Force

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 33

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Establish Centers for Fixed Wing Air 

Platform Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 24

Establish Centers for Rotary Wing Air 

Platform Development and Acquisition, Test 

and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 26

Naval Air Station Atlanta, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 13

Robins Air Force Base, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 16

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

A-14
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Savannah International Airport Air Guard Station 

Fort Smith Air Guard Station, AR and Luke 

Air Force Base, AZ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 9

New Castle Airport Air Guard Station, DE Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 15

Submarine Base Kings Bay

Consolidate Navy Strategic Test & 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 12

Submarine Base New London, CT Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 10

U.S. Army Reserve Center Columbus

RC Transformation in Georgia Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 39

Guam

Andersen Air Force Base

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

Hawaii 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Honokaa 

RC Transformation in Hawaii Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 40

Hickam Air Force Base

Air Force Logistics Support Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 53

Grand Forks Air Force Base, ND Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 37

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

Naval Station Pearl Harbor

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Naval Shipyard Portsmouth, Kittery, ME Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 23

Idaho

Boise Air Terminal Air Guard Station

Boise Air Terminal Air Guard Station, ID Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 17

Great Falls International Airport Air Guard 

Station, MT

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 30

A-15
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Mountain Home Air Force Base

Hill Air Force Base, UT, Edwards Air Force 

Base, CA, Mountain Home Air Force Base, 

ID, Luke Air Force Base, AZ, and Nellis Air 

Force Base, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 47

Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID, Nellis 

Air Force Base, NV, and Elmendorf Air 

Force Base, AK

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 18

Navy Reserve Center Pocatello

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Illinois 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Carbondale 

RC Transformation in Illinois Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 42

Capital Airport Air Guard Station 

Capital Air Guard Station, IL and Hulman 

Regional Airport Air Guard Station, IN

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 20

Fort Sheridan 

USAR Command and Control – Northeast Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 109

Greater Peoria Regional Airport

Nashville International Airport Air Guard 

Station, TN

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 44

Naval Station Great Lakes

Convert Inpatient Services to Clinics Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 12

Engineering Field Division/Activity Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 28

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Navy Regions Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 35

Navy Reserve Readiness Commands Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 44

San Antonio Regional Medical Center, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 10

Navy Reserve Center Forest Park

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

A-16
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Rock Island Arsenal

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Fort Gillem, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 6

Relocate Army Headquarters and Field 

Operating Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 46

Rock Island Arsenal, IL Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 7

Scott Air Force Base

Air Force Logistics Support Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 53

Consolidate Transportation Command 

Components

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 31

Convert Inpatient Services to Clinics Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 12

Grand Forks Air Force Base, ND Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 37

Indiana 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Indianapolis

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Fort Wayne International Airport Air Guard Station 

Capital Air Guard Station, IL and Hulman 

Regional Airport Air Guard Station, IN

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 20

Hulman Regional Airport Air Guard Station 

Capital Air Guard Station, IL and Hulman 

Regional Airport Air Guard Station, IN

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 20

Leased Space - IN

Consolidate/Co-locate Active and Reserve 

Personnel & Recruiting Centers for Army 

and Air Force

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 33

A-17
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Naval Support Activity Crane

Create a Naval Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 15

Create an Integrated Weapons & Armaments 

Specialty Site for Guns and Ammunition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 19

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Grissom Air Reserve Base, Bunker Hill

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Navy Recruiting District HQ Indianapolis

Navy Recruiting Districts Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 34

Navy Reserve Center Evansville

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Newport Chemical Depot

Newport Chemical Depot, IN Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 8

U.S. Army Reserve Center Lafeyette 

RC Transformation in Indiana Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 44

U.S. Army Reserve Center Seston

RC Transformation in Indiana Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 44

Iowa 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Camp Dodge 

RC Transformation in Iowa Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 46

Des Moines International Airport Air Guard Station

Capital Air Guard Station, IL and Hulman 

Regional Airport Air Guard Station, IN

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 20

Great Falls International Airport Air Guard 

Station, MT

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 30

Richmond Air Guard Station, VA, and Des 

Moines International Airport Air Guard 

Station, IA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 50

Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air 

Guard Station, OH,

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 40

Navy Reserve Center Cedar Rapids

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Navy Reserve Center Sioux City 

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

A-18
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Dubuque

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Sioux Gateway Airport Air Guard

Fairchild Air Force Base, WA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 51

Kansas 

Forbes Field Air Guard Station

Grand Forks Air Force Base, ND Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 37

Portland International Airport Air Guard 

Station, OR

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 41

Fort Leavenworth

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Fort Riley

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Operational Army (IGPBS) Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 22

Kansas Army Ammunition Plant

Kansas Army Ammunition Plant, KS Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 9

McConnell Air Force Base

Grand Forks Air Force Base, ND Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 37

Lackland Air Force Base, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 46

March Air Reserve Base, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 11

Robins Air Force Base, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 16

U.S. Army Reserve Center Wichita 

USAR Command and Control – Northwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 112

Kentucky 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Paducah 

RC Transformation in Kentucky Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 48

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Lexington

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Fort Campbell

Fort Gillem, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 6

Operational Army (IGPBS) Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 22

A-19
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Fort Knox

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Consolidate/Co-locate Active and Reserve 

Personnel & Recruiting Centers for Army 

and Air Force

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 33

Convert Inpatient Services to Clinics Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 12

Fort Monmouth, NJ Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 11

Fort Monroe, VA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 19

Maneuver Training Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 20

Relocate Army Headquarters and Field 

Operating Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 46

USAR Command and Control – Southeast Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 115

Louisville International Airport Air Guard Station 

Mansfield-Lahm Municipal Airport Air 

Guard Station, OH

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 39

Nashville International Airport Air Guard 

Station, TN

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 44

Navy Recruiting Command Louisville

Create an Integrated Weapons & Armaments 

Specialty Site for Guns and Ammunition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 19

Navy Reserve Center Lexington

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

U.S. Army Reserve Center Louisville 

USAR Command and Control – Southeast Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 115

U.S. Army Reserve Center Maysville 

RC Transformation in Kentucky Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 48

Louisiana

Army National Guard Reserve Center Baton Rouge

RC Transformation in Louisiana Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 50

Barksdale Air Force Base

Eielson Air Force Base, AK, Moody Air 

Force Base, GA, and Shaw Air Force Base, 

SC

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 6

New Orleans Air Reserve Station, LA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 22

Baton Rouge Armed Forces Reserve Center 

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Leased Space - Slidell

Consolidate Defense Information Systems 

Agency and Establish Joint C4ISR D&A 

Capability

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 27

A-20
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Naval Air Station New Orleans

F100 Engine Centralized Intermediate 

Repair Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 55

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Marine Corps Support Activity Kansas City, 

MO

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 19

Naval Air Station Atlanta, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 13

Naval Support Activity New Orleans, LA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 15

New Orleans Air Reserve Station, LA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 22

Portland International Airport Air Guard 

Station, OR

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 41

Naval Support Activity New Orleans

Naval Support Activity New Orleans, LA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 15

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Baton Rouge

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Roberts U.S. Army Reserve Center, Baton Rouge 

RC Transformation in Louisiana Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 50

Maine

Bangor International Airport Air Guard Station 

Birmingham International Airport Air Guard 

Station, AL

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 5

Key Field Air Guard Station, MS Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 28

Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station, NY Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 33

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Limestone

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Naval Air Station Brunswick

Naval Air Station Brunswick, ME Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 18

Naval Reserve Center, Bangor

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

A-21
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Maryland 

Aberdeen Proving Ground

Brooks City Base, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 6

Combat Service Support Center Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 6

Consolidate Army Test and Evaluation 

Command (ATEC) Headquarters

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 18

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Defense Research Service Led Laboratories Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 22

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Fort Monmouth, NJ Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 11

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Relocate Army Headquarters and Field 

Operating Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 46

Walter Reed National Military Medical 

Center, Bethesda, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 4

Andrews Air Force Base

Andrews Air Force Base, MD, Will Rogers 

Air Guard Station, OK, Tinker Air Force 

Base, OK, and Randolph Air Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 23

Cannon Air Force Base, NM Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 32

Co-locate Military Department Investigation 

Agencies with DoD Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 8

Co-locate Miscellaneous Air Force Leased 

Locations and National Guard Headquarters 

Leased Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 3

Convert Inpatient Services to Clinics Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 12

Martin State Air Guard Station, MD Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 24

Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi

Create an Integrated Weapons & Armaments 

Specialty Site for Guns and Ammunition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 19

Bethesda/Chevy Chase

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Patuxent River

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

A-22
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Fort Detrick

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Walter Reed National Military Medical 

Center, Bethesda, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 4

Fort Lewis

Relocate Miscellaneous Department of Navy 

Leased Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 49

Fort Meade

Co-locate Defense/Military Department 

Adjudication Activities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 5

Consolidate Defense Information Systems 

Agency and Establish Joint C4ISR D&A 

Capability

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 27

Consolidate Media Organizations into a New 

Agency for Media and Publications

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 30

Fort Monmouth, NJ Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 11

I-270 Corridor

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Leased Space - MD

Co-locate Defense/Military Department 

Adjudication Activities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 5

Co-locate Military Department Investigation 

Agencies with DoD Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 8

Martin State Airport Air Guard Station

Bradley International Airport Air Guard 

Station, CT, Barnes Air Guard Station, MA, 

Selfridge Air National Guard Base, MI, 

Shaw Air Force Base, SC, and Martin State 

Air Guard Station, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 14

Martin State Air Guard Station, MD Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 24

National Naval Medical Center Bethesda

Co-locate Extramural Research Program 

Managers

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 5

Walter Reed National Military Medical 

Center, Bethesda, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 4

Naval Air Facility Washington

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

A-23
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Naval Air Station Patuxent River

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Create a Naval Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 15

Establish Centers for Rotary Wing Air 

Platform Development and Acquisition, Test 

and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 26

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Relocate Miscellaneous Department of Navy 

Leased Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 49

Naval Station Annapolis

Naval Shipyard Detachments Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 26

Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head

Create a Naval Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 15

Create an Integrated Weapons & Armaments 

Specialty Site for Guns and Ammunition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 19

Naval Surface Weapons Station Carderock

Consolidate Sea Vehicle Development & 

Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 13

Navy Reserve Center Adelphi

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

PFC Flair U.S. Army Reserve Center, Frederick 

RC Transformation in Maryland Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 52

Massachusetts

Armed Forces Reserve Center New Westover 

USAR Command and Control New England Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 107

Barnes Municipal Airport Air Guard Station 

Bradley International Airport Air Guard 

Station, CT, Barnes Air Guard Station, MA, 

Selfridge Air National Guard Base, MI, 

Shaw Air Force Base, SC, and Martin State 

Air Guard Station, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 14

Otis Air National Guard Base, MA, Lambert 

St. Louis International Airport, Air Guard 

Station, MO, and Atlantic City Air Guard 

Station, NJ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 25

A-24
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Hanscom Air Force Base

Consolidate Air and Space C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 6

Defense Research Service Led Laboratories Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 22

Malony U.S. Army Reserve Center

USAR Command and Control New England Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 107

Natick Soldier Systems Center

Co-locate Defense/Military Department 

Adjudication Activities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 5

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Naval Shipyard Puget Sound-Boston Detachment

Naval Shipyard Detachments Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 26

Otis Air Guard Base 

Otis Air National Guard Base, MA, Lambert 

St. Louis International Airport, Air Guard 

Station, MO, and Atlantic City Air Guard 

Station, NJ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 25

Westover Air Force Base

Submarine Base New London, CT Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 10

Westover U.S. Army Reserve Center, Cicopee 

USAR Command and Control New England Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 107

Michigan 

Detroit / Selfridge

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Consolidate Ground Vehicle Development & 

Acquisition in a Joint Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 7

Consolidate Sea Vehicle Development & 

Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 13

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

U.S. Army Garrison Michigan (Selfridge) Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 106

A-25
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Detroit Arsenal

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Consolidate Ground Vehicle Development & 

Acquisition in a Joint Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 7

Consolidate Sea Vehicle Development & 

Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 13

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

U.S. Army Garrison Michigan (Selfridge) Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 106

Navy Reserve Center Marquette

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Parisan U.S. Army Reserve Center, Lansing 

RC Transformation in Michigan Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 55

Selfridge Air National Guard Base 

Beale Air Force Base, CA and Selfridge Air 

National Guard Base, MI

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 10

Bradley International Airport Air Guard 

Station, CT, Barnes Air Guard Station, MA, 

Selfridge Air National Guard Base, MI, 

Shaw Air Force Base, SC, and Martin State 

Air Guard Station, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 14

W.K. Kellogg Airport Air Guard Station, MI Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 27

Selfridge Army Activity

U.S. Army Garrison Michigan (Selfridge) Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 106

W. K. Kellogg Airport Air Guard Station 

W.K. Kellogg Airport Air Guard Station, MI Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 27

Minnesota

Fort Snelling 

USAR Command and Control – Northwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 112

Navy Reserve Center Duluth

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Mississippi

Columbus Air Force Base

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Undergraduate Pilot and Navigator Training Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 14

A-26
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Human Resources Support Center Southeast

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Jackson International Airport Air Guard Station

Key Field Air Guard Station, MS Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 28

Keesler Air Force Base

Convert Inpatient Services to Clinics Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 12

Key Field Air Guard Station 

Key Field Air Guard Station, MS Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 28

Mississippi Army Ammunition Plant

Mississippi Army Ammunition Plant, MS Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 11

Naval Air Station Meridian

Joint Center of Excellence for Religious 

Training & Education

Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 9

Naval Station Pascagoula

Naval Station Pascagoula, MS Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 20

U.S. Army Reserve Center Vicksburg 

RC Transformation in Alabama Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 25

Missouri

Army National Guard Reserve Center Jefferson Barracks

RC Transformation in Missouri Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 58

Army Reserve Personnel Center St Louis

Consolidate/Co-locate Active and Reserve 

Personnel & Recruiting Centers for Army 

and Air Force

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 33

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Kansas City

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, St. Louis

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Fort Leonard Wood

Prime Power to Fort Leonard Wood, MO Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 13

Single Drill Sergeant School Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 105

A-27
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Lambert International Airport- St Louis

Otis Air National Guard Base, MA, Lambert 

St. Louis International Airport, Air Guard 

Station, MO, and Atlantic City Air Guard 

Station, NJ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 25

Marine Corps Support Center Kansas City

Marine Corps Support Activity Kansas City, 

MO

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 19

Navy Recruiting District HQ Kansas

Navy Recruiting Districts Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 34

Navy Reserve Center Cape Girardeau

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Rosecrans Memorial Airport Air Guard Station

Andrews Air Force Base, MD, Will Rogers 

Air Guard Station, OK, Tinker Air Force 

Base, OK, and Randolph Air Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 23

Whiteman Air Force Base 

New Orleans Air Reserve Station, LA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 22

Montana 

Galt Hall U.S. Army Reserve Center, Great Falls

RC Transformation in Montana Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 60

Great Falls International Airport Air Guard Station 

Great Falls International Airport Air Guard 

Station, MT

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 30

Nebraska 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Columbus 

RC Transformation in Nebraska Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 62

Army National Guard Reserve Center Grand Island 

RC Transformation in Nebraska Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 62

Army National Guard Reserve Center Kearny

RC Transformation in Nebraska Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 62

Naval Recruiting District HQ Omaha

Navy Recruiting Districts Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 34

Navy Reserve Center Lincoln

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

A-28
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Offutt Air Force Base

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Nevada

Hawthorne Army Depot

Hawthorne Army Depot, NV Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 12

Naval Air Station Fallon

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Nellis Air Force Base

Cannon Air Force Base, NM Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 32

Eielson Air Force Base, AK, Moody Air 

Force Base, GA, and Shaw Air Force Base, 

SC

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 6

Hill Air Force Base, UT, Edwards Air Force 

Base, CA, Mountain Home Air Force Base, 

ID, Luke Air Force Base, AZ, and Nellis Air 

Force Base, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 47

Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID, Nellis 

Air Force Base, NV, and Elmendorf Air 

Force Base, AK

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 18

New Orleans Air Reserve Station, LA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 22

Otis Air National Guard Base, MA, Lambert 

St. Louis International Airport, Air Guard 

Station, MO, and Atlantic City Air Guard 

Station, NJ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 25

Reno-Tahoe International Airport Air Guard Station 

Reno-Tahoe International Airport Air Guard 

Station, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 31

New Hampshire

Doble U.S. Army Reserve Center Portsmouth

RC Transformation in New Hampshire Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 65

Naval Shipyard Portsmouth

Naval Shipyard Portsmouth, Kittery, ME Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 23

Pease International

March Air Reserve Base, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 11

A-29
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

New Jersey 

Atlantic City International Airport Air Guard Station 

Otis Air National Guard Base, MA, Lambert 

St. Louis International Airport, Air Guard 

Station, MO, and Atlantic City Air Guard 

Station, NJ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 25

Portland International Airport Air Guard 

Station, OR

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 41

Fort Dix

Create Joint Mobilization Sites Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 35

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Willow 

Grove, PA, and Cambria Regional Airport, 

Johnstown, PA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 21

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

USAR Command and Control – Northeast Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 109

Fort Monmouth

Fort Monmouth, NJ Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 11

Inspector/Instructor West Trenton

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Kilmer U.S. Army Reserve Center, Edison 

USAR Command and Control – Northeast Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 109

McGuire Air Force Base

Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Willow 

Grove, PA, and Cambria Regional Airport, 

Johnstown, PA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 21

New Castle Airport Air Guard Station, DE Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 15

Naval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst

Establish Centers for Rotary Wing Air 

Platform Development and Acquisition, Test 

and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 26

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

Naval Weapons Station Earle

Create an Integrated Weapons & Armaments 

Specialty Site for Guns and Ammunition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 19

Submarine Base New London, CT Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 10

Picatinny Arsenal

Create an Integrated Weapons & Armaments 

Specialty Site for Guns and Ammunition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 19

A-30
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

SFC Nelson B. Brittin U.S. Army Reserve Center

RC Transformation in New Jersey Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 66

New Mexico 

Cannon Air Force Base

Cannon Air Force Base, NM Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 32

Holloman Air Force Base

Brooks City Base, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 6

Jenkins Armed Forces Reserve Center Albuquerque 

RC Transformation in New Mexico Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 68

Kirtland Air Force Base

Cannon Air Force Base, NM Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 32

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Defense Research Service Led Laboratories Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 22

White Sands Missile Range

Defense Research Service Led Laboratories Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 22

New York 

Armed Forces Reserve Center Amityville 

RC Transformation in New York Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 69

Army National Guard Reserve Center Niagara Falls

RC Transformation in New York Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 69

Carpenter U.S. Army Reserve Center,Poughkeepie

USAR Command and Control – Northeast Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 109

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Rome

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Fort Totten / Pyle 

USAR Command and Control – Northeast Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 109

Navy Recruiting District HQ Buffalo

Navy Recruiting Districts Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 34

Navy Reserve Center Glenn Falls

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Navy Reserve Center Horsehead

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

A-31
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Navy Reserve Center Watertown

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Niagara Falls International Airport Air Guard Station 

Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station, NY Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 33

Rome Laboratory

Defense Research Service Led Laboratories Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 22

Schenectady County Air Guard Station 

Schenectady County Airport Air Guard 

Station, NY

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 34

United States Military Academy

Fort Monmouth, NJ Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 11

North Carolina 

Army Research Office, Durham

Co-locate Extramural Research Program 

Managers

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 5

Charlotte/Douglas 

New Castle Airport Air Guard Station, DE Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 15

Fort Bragg

Fort Bragg, NC Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 10

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point

Convert Inpatient Services to Clinics Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 12

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Willow 

Grove, PA, and Cambria Regional Airport, 

Johnstown, PA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 21

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

A-32
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

MCAS Cherry Point

Convert Inpatient Services to Clinics Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 12

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Willow 

Grove, PA, and Cambria Regional Airport, 

Johnstown, PA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 21

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Navy Reserve Center Asheville

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Niven U.S. Army Reserve Center, Albermarle

RC Transformation in North Carolina Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 72

Pope Air Force Base

Fort Gillem, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 6

Fort McPherson, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 8

General Mitchell Air Reserve Station, WI Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 52

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Seymore Johnson Air Force Base

F100 Engine Centralized Intermediate 

Repair Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 55

Grand Forks Air Force Base, ND Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 37

North Dakota 

Grand Forks Air Force Base

Grand Forks Air Force Base, ND Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 37

Ohio 

Armed Forces Reserve Center Akron 

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Army National Guard Reserve Center Mansfield 

RC Transformation in Ohio Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 75

Army National Guard Reserve Center Westerville

RC Transformation in Ohio Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 75

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Cleveland

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

A-33
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Dayton

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Defense Supply Center Columbus

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Fort Monmouth, NJ Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 11

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Glenn Research Center

Defense Research Service Led Laboratories Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 22

Leased Space - OH

Co-locate Defense/Military Department 

Adjudication Activities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 5

Co-locate Military Department Investigation 

Agencies with DoD Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 8

Mansfield Lahm MAP Air Guard Station 

Mansfield-Lahm Municipal Airport Air 

Guard Station, OH

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 39

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Akron

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Cleveland

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Parrott U.S. Army Reserve Center Kenton

RC Transformation in Ohio Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 75

Rickenbacker Army National Guard Bldg 943 Columbus

RC Transformation in Ohio Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 75

Rickenbacker International Airport Air Guard Station 

Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air 

Guard Station, OH,

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 40

Scouten U.S. Army Reserve Center Mansfield 

RC Transformation in Ohio Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 75

A-34
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air Guard Station

Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air 

Guard Station, OH,

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 40

Toledo Express Airport Air Guard Station

Mansfield-Lahm Municipal Airport Air 

Guard Station, OH

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 39

Richmond Air Guard Station, VA, and Des 

Moines International Airport Air Guard 

Station, IA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 50

U.S. Army Reserve Center Whitehall 

RC Transformation in Ohio Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 75

Wright Patterson Air Force Base

Brooks City Base, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 6

Consolidate Air and Space C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 6

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Defense Research Service Led Laboratories Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 22

Establish Centers for Fixed Wing Air 

Platform Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 24

Establish Centers for Rotary Wing Air 

Platform Development and Acquisition, Test 

and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 26

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Youngstown-Warren Regional Airport

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Oklahoma 

Altus Air Force Base

Air Force Logistics Support Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 53

Armed Forces Reserve Center Broken Arrow 

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Army National Guard Reserve Center Broken Arrow RC

RC Transformation in Oklahoma Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 77

Army National Guard Reserve Center Tishomingo

RC Transformation in Oklahoma Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 77

A-35
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Ashworth U.S. Army Reserve Center Muskogee 

RC Transformation in Oklahoma Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 77

Fort Sill

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Net Fires Center Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 12

Operational Army (IGPBS) Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 22

USAR Command and Control – Southwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 117

Krowse U.S. Army Reserve Center Oklahoma City

RC Transformation in Oklahoma Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 77

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Tulsa

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Oklahoma City (95th)

USAR Command and Control – Southwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 117

Tinker Air Force Base 

Andrews Air Force Base, MD, Will Rogers 

Air Guard Station, OK, Tinker Air Force 

Base, OK, and Randolph Air Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 23

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Establish Centers for Fixed Wing Air 

Platform Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 24

Portland International Airport Air Guard 

Station, OR

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 41

Red River Army Depot, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 16

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Tulsa International Airport Air Guard Station 

Fort Smith Air Guard Station, AR and Luke 

Air Force Base, AZ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 9

Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID, Nellis 

Air Force Base, NV, and Elmendorf Air 

Force Base, AK

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 18

Richmond Air Guard Station, VA, and Des 

Moines International Airport Air Guard 

Station, IA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 50

A-36
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Vance Air Force Base

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Undergraduate Pilot and Navigator Training Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 14

Will Rogers World Airport Air Guard Station

Andrews Air Force Base, MD, Will Rogers 

Air Guard Station, OK, Tinker Air Force 

Base, OK, and Randolph Air Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 23

Oregon 

Navy Reserve Center Central Point

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Portland International Airport Air Guard Station 

Portland International Airport Air Guard 

Station, OR

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 41

Umatilla Army Depot

Umatilla Chemical Depot, OR Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 14

Pennsylvania 

Bristol U.S. Army Reserve Center, Philadelphia

RC Transformation in Pennsylvania Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 82

Defense Distribution Depot Susquehanna

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Engineering Field Activity Northeast

Engineering Field Division/Activity Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 28

Human Resources Support Center Northeast

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Kelly Support Center

USAR Command and Control – Northeast Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 109

Letterkenny Army Depot

Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 6

Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 4

Red River Army Depot, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 16

Rock Island Arsenal, IL Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 7

A-37
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Marine Corps Reserve Center Johnstown

Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Willow 

Grove, PA, and Cambria Regional Airport, 

Johnstown, PA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 21

Naval Air Station Willow Grove

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Willow 

Grove, PA, and Cambria Regional Airport, 

Johnstown, PA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 21

Naval Support Activity Mechanicsburg

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Naval Support Activity Philadelphia

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Navy Crane Center Lester

Engineering Field Division/Activity Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 28

Navy Philadelphia Business Center

Naval Shipyard Detachments Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 26

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Lehigh

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Pittsburgh

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Reading

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

North Penn U.S. Army Reserve Center, Norristown

RC Transformation in Pennsylvania Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 82

Pitt U.S. Army Reserve Center, Corapolis

USAR Command and Control – Northeast Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 109

Pittsburgh International Airport Air Reserve Station

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Serrenti U.S. Army Reserve Center, Scranton

RC Transformation in Pennsylvania Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 82

A-38
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Tobyhanna Army Depot

Lackland Air Force Base, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 15

Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 6

Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 4

Red River Army Depot, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 16

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

U.S. Army Reserve Center Bloomsburg

RC Transformation in Pennsylvania Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 82

U.S. Army Reserve Center Lewisburg 

RC Transformation in Pennsylvania Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 82

U.S. Army Reserve Williamsport 

RC Transformation in Pennsylvania Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 82

W. Reese U.S. Army Reserve Center/OMS, Chester

RC Transformation in Pennsylvania Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 82

Puerto Rico

Army National Guard Reserve Center Humacao

RC Transformation in Puerto Rico Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 85

Fort Buchanan

Relocate Army Headquarters and Field 

Operating Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 46

Lavergne U.S. Army Reserve Center Bayamon

RC Transformation in Puerto Rico Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 85

U.S. Army Reserve Center Ramey

RC Transformation in Puerto Rico Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 85

U.S. Army Reserve Center Rubio

RC Transformation in Puerto Rico Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 85

Rhode Island 

Bristol U.S. Army Reserve Center

RC Transformation in Rhode Island Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 87

Harwood U.S. Army Reserve Center, Providence

RC Transformation in Rhode Island Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 87

A-39
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Naval Station Newport

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Joint Center of Excellence for Religious 

Training & Education

Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 9

Naval Station Newport, RI Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 25

Navy Reserve Readiness Commands Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 44

Navy Supply Corps School Athens, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 14

Officer Training Command, Pensacola, FL Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 12

Submarine Base New London, CT Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 10

Quonset State Airport AG 

Martin State Air Guard Station, MD Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 24

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Quonset State Airport Air Guard Station

Martin State Air Guard Station, MD Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 24

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

South Carolina 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Charleston

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Fort Jackson

Create Joint Mobilization Sites Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 35

Joint Center of Excellence for Religious 

Training & Education

Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 9

Single Drill Sergeant School Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 105

USAR Command and Control – Southeast Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 115

Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

McEntire Air Guard Station

Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID, Nellis 

Air Force Base, NV, and Elmendorf Air 

Force Base, AK

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 18

A-40
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Naval Weapons Station Charleston

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

Shaw Air Force Base

Bradley International Airport Air Guard 

Station, CT, Barnes Air Guard Station, MA, 

Selfridge Air National Guard Base, MI, 

Shaw Air Force Base, SC, and Martin State 

Air Guard Station, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 14

Eielson Air Force Base, AK, Moody Air 

Force Base, GA, and Shaw Air Force Base, 

SC

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 6

Fort Gillem, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 6

Fort McPherson, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 8

Hill Air Force Base, UT, Edwards Air Force 

Base, CA, Mountain Home Air Force Base, 

ID, Luke Air Force Base, AZ, and Nellis Air 

Force Base, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 47

Mountain Home Air Force Base, ID, Nellis 

Air Force Base, NV, and Elmendorf Air 

Force Base, AK

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 18

South Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Engineering Field Division/Activity Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 28

South Dakota 

Ellsworth Air Force Base

Ellsworth Air Force Base, SD, and Dyess Air 

Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 43

Joe Foss Field Air Guard Station

Cannon Air Force Base, NM Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 32

Capital Air Guard Station, IL and Hulman 

Regional Airport Air Guard Station, IN

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 20

Tennessee 

McGee Tyson Airport Air Guard Station 

Beale Air Force Base, CA and Selfridge Air 

National Guard Base, MI

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 10

Birmingham International Airport Air Guard 

Station, AL

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 5

Key Field Air Guard Station, MS Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 28

March Air Reserve Base, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 11

A-41
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

McGee Tyson APT Air Guard Station

Beale Air Force Base, CA and Selfridge Air 

National Guard Base, MI

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 10

Birmingham International Airport Air Guard 

Station, AL

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 5

Key Field Air Guard Station, MS Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 28

March Air Reserve Base, CA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 11

Memphis International Airport Air Guard Station

Nashville International Airport Air Guard 

Station, TN

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 44

Nashville International Airport Air Guard Station 

Nashville International Airport Air Guard 

Station, TN

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 44

Naval Support Activity Mid South

Co-locate Navy Education and Training 

Command and Navy Education and Training 

Professional Development & Technology 

Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 17

Naval Support Activity New Orleans, LA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 15

U.S. Army Reserve Area Maintenance Support Facility Kingsport

RC Transformation in Tennessee Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 89

Texas 

Army National Guard Reserve Center # 2 Dallas 

RC Transformation in Texas Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 91

Army National Guard Reserve Center (Hondo Pass) El Paso 

RC Transformation in Texas Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 91

Army National Guard Reserve Center California Crossing 

RC Transformation in Texas Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 91

Army National Guard Reserve Center Ellington 

RC Transformation in Texas Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 91

Army National Guard Reserve Center Marshall

RC Transformation in Texas Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 91

Army National Guard Reserve Center New Braunfels 

RC Transformation in Texas Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 91

Brooks City Base

Brooks City Base, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 6

A-42
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Carswell Air Reserve Station, Naval Air Station Fort Worth

Andrews Air Force Base, MD, Will Rogers 

Air Guard Station, OK, Tinker Air Force 

Base, OK, and Randolph Air Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 23

Hill Air Force Base, UT, Edwards Air Force 

Base, CA, Mountain Home Air Force Base, 

ID, Luke Air Force Base, AZ, and Nellis Air 

Force Base, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 47

Corpus Christi Army Depot

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, San Antonio

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Dyess Air Force Base

Ellsworth Air Force Base, SD, and Dyess Air 

Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 43

Ellington Field Air Guard Station

Ellington Air Guard Station, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 45

Fort Bliss

Net Fires Center Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 12

Operational Army (IGPBS) Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 22

Fort Hood

Fort Hood, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 15

Operational Army (IGPBS) Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 22

Fort Sam Houston

Brooks City Base, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 6

Fort McPherson, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 8

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Relocate Army Headquarters and Field 

Operating Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 46

San Antonio Regional Medical Center, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 10

Submarine Base New London, CT Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 10

Walter Reed National Military Medical 

Center, Bethesda, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 4

A-43
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Lackland Air Force Base

Brooks City Base, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 6

Capital Air Guard Station, IL and Hulman 

Regional Airport Air Guard Station, IN

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 20

Consolidate Air and Space C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 6

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Joint Center for Consolidated Transportation 

Management Training

Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 7

Joint Center of Excellence for Culinary 

Training

Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 8

Lackland Air Force Base, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 46

Lackland Air Force Base, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 15

Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station, NY Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 33

Relocate Air Force Real Property Agency 

(AFRPA)

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 44

San Antonio Regional Medical Center, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 10

Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air 

Guard Station, OH,

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 40

Laughlin Air Force Base

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Undergraduate Pilot and Navigator Training Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 14

Leased Space - TX

Consolidate Defense Commissary Agency 

Eastern, Midwestern Regional, and 

Hopewell, VA, Offices

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 26

Consolidate Media Organizations into a New 

Agency for Media and Publications

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 30

Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant

Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 16

Naval Air Station Corpus Christi

Naval Station Ingleside, TX, and Naval Air 

Station Corpus Christi, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 26

Navy Regions Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 35

A-44
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Ft. Worth

Andrews Air Force Base, MD, Will Rogers 

Air Guard Station, OK, Tinker Air Force 

Base, OK, and Randolph Air Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 23

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Hill Air Force Base, UT, Edwards Air Force 

Base, CA, Mountain Home Air Force Base, 

ID, Luke Air Force Base, AZ, and Nellis Air 

Force Base, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 47

Naval Air Station Atlanta, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 13

Naval Support Activity New Orleans, LA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 15

Navy Reserve Readiness Commands Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 44

Naval Station Ingleside

Naval Station Ingleside, TX, and Naval Air 

Station Corpus Christi, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 26

Navy Reserve Center Lubbock, TX

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Navy Reserve Center Orange,TX

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Randolph Air Force Base

Andrews Air Force Base, MD, Will Rogers 

Air Guard Station, OK, Tinker Air Force 

Base, OK, and Randolph Air Force Base, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 23

Brooks City Base, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 6

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Consolidate/Co-locate Active and Reserve 

Personnel & Recruiting Centers for Army 

and Air Force

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 33

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Undergraduate Pilot and Navigator Training Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 14

Red River Army Depot

Red River Army Depot, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 16

A-45
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Sheppard Air Force Base

Joint Strike Fighter Initial Joint Training Site Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 10

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

San Antonio Regional Medical Center, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 10

Undergraduate Pilot and Navigator Training Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 14

U.S. Army Reserve Center # 2 Houston

RC Transformation in Texas Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 91

U.S. Army Reserve Center Lufkin 

RC Transformation in Texas Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 91

Utah 

Deseret Chemical Depot

Deseret Chemical Depot, UT Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 17

Fort Douglas 

USAR Command and Control – Northwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 112

Hill Air Force Base

Cannon Air Force Base, NM Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 32

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Create an Air Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 18

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Establish Centers for Fixed Wing Air 

Platform Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 24

Hill Air Force Base, UT, Edwards Air Force 

Base, CA, Mountain Home Air Force Base, 

ID, Luke Air Force Base, AZ, and Nellis Air 

Force Base, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 47

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Vermont 

Burlington International Airport Air Guard Station

Otis Air National Guard Base, MA, Lambert 

St. Louis International Airport, Air Guard 

Station, MO, and Atlantic City Air Guard 

Station, NJ

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 25

A-46
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Virginia 

Center for Naval Research

Co-locate Extramural Research Program 

Managers

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 5

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Arlington

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Defense Supply Center Richmond

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Fort Belvoir

Co-locate Extramural Research Program 

Managers

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 5

Co-locate Military Department Investigation 

Agencies with DoD Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 8

Co-locate Miscellaneous Army Leased 

Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 10

Co-locate Miscellaneous OSD, Defense 

Agency, and Field Activity Leased Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 12

Co-locate Missile and Space Defense 

Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 15

Consolidate Media Organizations into a New 

Agency for Media and Publications

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 30

Create an Air Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 18

Depot Level Reparable Procurement 

Management Consolidation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 7

Fort Monmouth, NJ Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 11

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Prime Power to Fort Leonard Wood, MO Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 13

Relocate Army Headquarters and Field 

Operating Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 46

Walter Reed National Military Medical 

Center, Bethesda, MD

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 4

A-47
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Fort Eustis

Aviation Logistics School Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 5

Combat Service Support Center Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 6

Consolidate Transportation Command 

Components

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 31

Convert Inpatient Services to Clinics Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 12

Create Joint Mobilization Sites Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 35

Fort McPherson, GA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 8

Fort Monroe, VA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 19

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

Fort Lee

Co-locate Miscellaneous OSD, Defense 

Agency, and Field Activity Leased Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 12

Combat Service Support Center Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 6

Consolidate Defense Commissary Agency 

Eastern, Midwestern Regional, and 

Hopewell, VA, Offices

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 26

Joint Center for Consolidated Transportation 

Management Training

Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 7

Joint Center of Excellence for Culinary 

Training

Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 8

Fort Monroe

Fort Monroe, VA Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 19

Headquarters Battalion, Headquarters Marine Corps, Henderson Hall

Co-locate Miscellaneous Air Force Leased 

Locations and National Guard Headquarters 

Leased Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 3

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

A-48
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Langley Air Force Base 

Air Force Logistics Support Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 53

Eielson Air Force Base, AK, Moody Air 

Force Base, GA, and Shaw Air Force Base, 

SC

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 6

F100 Engine Centralized Intermediate 

Repair Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 55

Hill Air Force Base, UT, Edwards Air Force 

Base, CA, Mountain Home Air Force Base, 

ID, Luke Air Force Base, AZ, and Nellis Air 

Force Base, NV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 47

Kulis Air Guard Station and Elmendorf Air 

Force Base, AK

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 7

Langley Air Force Base, VA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 49

Niagara Falls Air Reserve Station, NY Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 33

Langley Research Center

Defense Research Service Led Laboratories Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 22

A-49
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Leased Space - VA

Co-locate Defense/Military Department 

Adjudication Activities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 5

Co-locate Extramural Research Program 

Managers

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 5

Co-locate Military Department Investigation 

Agencies with DoD Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 8

Co-locate Miscellaneous Air Force Leased 

Locations and National Guard Headquarters 

Leased Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 3

Co-locate Miscellaneous Army Leased 

Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 10

Co-locate Miscellaneous OSD, Defense 

Agency, and Field Activity Leased Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 12

Co-locate Missile and Space Defense 

Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 15

Consolidate Army Test and Evaluation 

Command (ATEC) Headquarters

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 18

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

Consolidate Defense Commissary Agency 

Eastern, Midwestern Regional, and 

Hopewell, VA, Offices

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 26

Consolidate Defense Information Systems 

Agency and Establish Joint C4ISR D&A 

Capability

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 27

Consolidate Media Organizations into a New 

Agency for Media and Publications

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 30

Consolidate Transportation Command 

Components

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 31

Consolidate/Co-locate Active and Reserve 

Personnel & Recruiting Centers for Army 

and Air Force

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 33

Fort Monmouth, NJ Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 11

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Relocate Army Headquarters and Field 

Operating Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 46

Relocate Miscellaneous Department of Navy 

Leased Locations

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 49

Marine Corps Base Quantico

Co-locate Military Department Investigation 

Agencies with DoD Counterintelligence and 

Security Agency

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 8

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

A-50
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Nacval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Create a Naval Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 15

Create an Integrated Weapons & Armaments 

Specialty Site for Guns and Ammunition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 19

Joint Centers of Excellence For Chemical, 

Biological, and Medical Research and 

Development and Acquisition

Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 15

Naval Air Station Oceana

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Joint Strike Fighter Initial Joint Training Site Vol 1: Part 2 - Education & 

Training Section

E&T - 10

Naval Amphibious Base Little Creek

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Naval Medical Center Portsmouth

San Antonio Regional Medical Center, TX Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 10

Submarine Base New London, CT Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 10

Naval Shipyard Norfolk

Engineering Field Division/Activity Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 28

Naval Shipyard Detachments Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 26

Naval Shipyard Portsmouth, Kittery, ME Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 23

Ship Intermediate Maintenance Activity 

Norfolk, VA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 18

Submarine Base New London, CT Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 10

A-51
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Naval Station Norfolk

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Defense Finance and Accounting Service Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 37

Engineering Field Division/Activity Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 28

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Naval Station Ingleside, TX, and Naval Air 

Station Corpus Christi, TX

Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 26

Naval Station Newport, RI Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 25

Navy Reserve Readiness Commands Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 44

Ship Intermediate Maintenance Activity 

Norfolk, VA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 18

Submarine Base New London, CT Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 10

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Naval Support Activity Norfolk

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

Engineering Field Division/Activity Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 28

Naval Support Activity New Orleans, LA Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 15

Naval Weapons Station Yorktown

Consolidate Maritime C4ISR Research, 

Development and Acquisition, Test and 

Evaluation

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 9

Create a Naval Integrated Weapons & 

Armaments Research, Development and 

Acquisition, Test and Evaluation Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 15

Richmond International Airport Air Guard Station 

Richmond Air Guard Station, VA, and Des 

Moines International Airport Air Guard 

Station, IA

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 50

USMC Direct Reporting Program Manager Advanced Amphibious Assault

Consolidate Ground Vehicle Development & 

Acquisition in a Joint Center

Vol 1: Part 2 - Technical Section Tech - 7

Washington 

1LT Richard H. Walker U.S. Army Reserve Center

RC Transformation in Washington Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 97

A-52
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

Army National Guard Reserve Center Everett 

RC Transformation in Washington Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 97

Fairchild Air Force Base

Fairchild Air Force Base, WA Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 51

Fort Lewis

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

McChord Air Force Base, WA Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 9

USAR Command and Control – Northwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 112

Human Resources Support Center Northwest

Consolidate Civilian Personnel Offices 

(CPOs) within each Military Department and 

the Defense Agencies

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 19

McChord Air Force Base

Joint Basing Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 41

McChord Air Force Base, WA Vol 1: Part 2 - Medical Section Med - 9

Portland International Airport Air Guard 

Station, OR

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 41

Naval Air Station Whidbey Island

Fleet Readiness Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 19

Naval Station Bremerton

Commodity Management Privatization Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 5

Naval Shipyard Detachments Vol 1: Part 2 - Industrial Section Ind - 26

Naval Shipyard Portsmouth, Kittery, ME Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 23

Supply, Storage, and Distribution 

Management Reconfiguration

Vol 1: Part 2 - Supply and Storage 

Section

S&S - 13

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Tacoma

Navy Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 37

Submarine Base Bangor

Consolidate Correctional Facilities into Joint 

Regional Correctional Facilities

Vol 1: Part 2 - Headquarters and 

Support Activities Section

H&SA - 22

U.S. Army Reserve Center Fort Lawton

USAR Command and Control – Northwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 112

Vancover Barracks

USAR Command and Control – Northwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 112

A-53
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

West Virginia 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Fairmont 

RC Transformation in West Virginia Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 99

Bias U.S. Army Reserve Center, Huntington

RC Transformation in West Virginia Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 99

Eastern West Virginia Regional Airport Sheppard Field Air Guard Station

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Ewvra Sheppard Air Guard Station

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Moundsville

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Yeager Airport Air Guard Station

Pope Air Force Base, NC, Pittsburgh 

International Airport Air Reserve Station, 

PA, and Yeager Air Guard Station, WV

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 35

Wisconsin 

Armed Forces Reserve Center Madison

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Dane County Regional Airport

Cannon Air Force Base, NM Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 32

Capital Air Guard Station, IL and Hulman 

Regional Airport Air Guard Station, IN

Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 20

Fort McCoy

Maneuver Training Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 20

USAR Command and Control – Northwest Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 112

Gen Mitchell International Airport Air Reserve Station

General Mitchell Air Reserve Station, WI Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 52

Key Field Air Guard Station, MS Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 28

Navy Reserve Center La Crosse 

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Madison

Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Centers Vol 1: Part 2 - Navy Section DoN - 29

A-54
Installations: Recommendations Impacting 

Installation

Report Location Page

O'Connell U.S. Army Reserve Center

RC Transformation in Wisconsin Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 102

Olson U.S. Army Reserve Center, Madison

RC Transformation in Wisconsin Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 102

Wyoming 

Army Aviation Support Facility Cheyenne 

RC Transformation in Wyoming Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 103

Army National Guard Reserve Center Thermopolis

RC Transformation in Wyoming Vol 1: Part 2 - Army Section USA - 103

Cheyenne Airport Air Guard Station

Boise Air Terminal Air Guard Station, ID Vol 1: Part 2 - Air Force Section USAF - 17

A-55

B - i

Appendix B 

BRAC 2005 Closure and Realignment Impacts by Economic Area 

Note 

The listing of installations in this appendix does not include BRAC actions for where 

there are no (zero) net job changes. In a limited number of cases, the impact of National 

Guard or Reserve facility job changes were aggregated with those of the closest active 

military installation, or of a nearby National Guard or Reserve facility. 

Definitions 

Economic Area is the economic region of influence assigned to each installation for 

BRAC 2005. Details on the assignment of installations to economic areas can be found 

in the description of the activities of Joint Process Action Team 6. 

Installation is the common name of the installation. In a limited number of cases, the 

impact of National Guard or Reserve facility job changes were aggregated with those of 

the closest active military installation, or of a nearby guard or reserve facility. 

Action is the BRAC 2005 action for the installation, such as close, realign, or gain. 

Out Mil is the number of military personnel authorizations that are either eliminated or 

re-located from the installation to a new location outside of their current economic area. 

Relocations within the same economic area do not constitute a BRAC economic impact. 

Out Civ is the number of civilian personnel authorizations that are either eliminated or 

re-located from the installation to a new location outside of their current economic area. 

Relocations within the same economic area do not constitute a BRAC economic impact. 

In Mil is the number of military personnel authorizations relocating into the installation 

from another economic area. 

In Civ is the number of civilian personnel authorizations relocating into the installation 

from another economic area. 

Net Gain/(Loss) Mil is the net change in the number of military personnel authorizations 

by installation. 
B - ii

Net Gain/(Loss) Civ is the net change in the number of civilian personnel authorizations 

by installation. 

Net Mission Contractors is the change in the number non-government employees who 

perform one or more of the military missions on the installation, and whose work tasks 

are virtually identical to government civilian employees or military personnel, expressed 

in full time equivalents. 

Indirect Changes is the sum of estimated indirect and induced job changes in the 

community associated with the change in Total Direct Jobs. Indirect job changes are the 

net addition or loss of local non-government jobs supporting installation material, 

service, and infrastructure needs, such as a local motor pool parts distributors or base 

operations support (BOS) contractors. Induced job changes are the net addition or loss of 

local non-government jobs in industries that provide goods or services to the households 

of direct or indirect installation employees. Examples include local grocery stores, retail 

stores, and restaurants. 

Total Job Changes is the sum of the Total Direct and Indirect Changes entries. 

Economic Area Employment is employment in the economic area for calendar year 

2002, which was the most recent official employment data available from the Department 

of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) at the time of the development of 

the BRAC 2005 Economic Impact Tool. 

Changes as a Percent of Employment is the result of dividing Total Job Changes by 

Economic Area Employment. 
BRAC 2005 Closure and Realignment Impacts by Econom

Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Abilene, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaDyess Air Force Base Gain (1,615) 129 (65) 310 64 1,925 0 374 358 732 

Total (1,615) 129 (65) 310 64 1,925 0 374 358 732 

Aguadilla-Isabela-San Sebastian, PR Metropolitan Statistical AreaAguadillla-Ramey U.S. Army Reserve Center/BMA-126

Realign (10) 0 0 (10) 0 0 0 (10) (5) (15) 

Total (10) 0 0 (10) 0 0 0 (10) (5) (15) 

Akron, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Akron

Close (26) 0 0 (26) 0 0 0 (26) (10) (36) 

Armed Forces Reserve Center Akron 

Gain 0 0 0 37 0 37 0 37 14 51 

Total (26) 0 0 11 0 37 0 11 4 15 

Alamogordo, NM Micropolitan Statistical AreaHolloman Air Force Base Realign (17) 0 0 (17) 0 0 0 (17) (11) (28) 

Total (17) 0 0 (17) 0 0 0 (17) (11) (28) 

Albany, GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaMarine Corps Logistics Base Albany

Gain (2) 193 (42) (1) 151 1 0 150 119 269 

Total (2) 193 (42) (1) 151 1 0 150 119 269 

Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaSchenectady County Air Guard Station 

Realign (10) 0 (9) (10) (9) 0 0 (19) (19) (38) 

Total (10) 0 (9) (10) (9) 0 0 (19) (19) (38) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Albemarle, NC Micropolitan Statistical AreaNiven U.S. Army Reserve Center, Albermarle

Close (34) 5 0 (34) 5 0 0 (29) (13) (42) 

Total (34) 5 0 (34) 5 0 0 (29) (13) (42) 

Albuquerque, NM Metropolitan Statistical AreaJenkins Armed Forces Reserve Center Albuquerque 

Close (35) 0 (1) (35) (1) 0 0 (36) (29) (65) 

Kirtland Air Force Base Gain (7) 176 0 30 176 37 0 206 206 412 

Total (42) 176 (1) (5) 175 37 0 170 177 347 

Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Lehigh

Gain 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 8 3 11 

Total 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 8 3 11 

Altus, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaAltus Air Force Base Realign (16) 0 0 (16) 0 0 0 (16) (10) (26) 

Total (16) 0 0 (16) 0 0 0 (16) (10) (26) 

Anchorage, AK Metropolitan Statistical AreaKulis Air Guard Station Close (218) 0 (241) (218) (241) 0 0 (459) (377) (836) Elmendorf Air Force Base Realign (1,499) 233 (65) (1,102) 168 397 0 (934) (643) (1,577) Fort Richardson Realign (86) 0 (199) (86) (199) 0 (1) (286) (244) (530) 

Total (1,803) 233 (505) (1,406) (272) 397 (1) (1,679) (1,264) (2,943) 

Anniston-Oxford, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaAnniston Army Depot Gain 0 1,121 (87) 0 1,034 0 0 1,034 766 1,800 

Total 0 (87) 0 1,034 0 1,121 0 1,034 766 1,800 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Aroostook County, MEDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Limestone

Close 0 0 (241) 0 (241) 0 0 (241) (149) (390) 

Total 0 0 (241) 0 (241) 0 0 (241) (149) (390) 

Asheville, NC Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Asheville Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Athens-Clarke County, GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Supply Corps School Athens

Close (393) 0 (108) (389) (108) 4 (16) (513) (317) (830) 

Total (393) 0 (108) (389) (108) 4 (16) (513) (317) (830) 

Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Gillem Close (517) 0 (570) (511) (570) 6 0 (1,081) (734) (1,815) Fort McPherson Close (2,260) 0 (1,881) (2,260) (1,881) 0 0 (4,141) (2,705) (6,846) Naval Air Station Atlanta Close (1,274) 0 (156) (1,274) (156) 0 (68) (1,498) (807) (2,305) Peachtree Leases Atlanta Close (65) 0 (97) (65) (97) 0 0 (162) (114) (276) Dobbins Air Reserve Base Gain 0 45 0 73 45 73 0 118 74 192 

Total (4,116) 45 (2,704) (4,037) (2,659) 79 (68) (6,764) (4,286) (11,050) 

Atlantic City, NJ Metropolitan Statistical AreaAtlantic City International Airport Air Guard Station 

Gain (3) 263 (53) 59 210 62 0 269 207 476 

Total (3) 263 (53) 59 210 62 0 269 207 476 

Bakersfield, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaEdwards Air Force Base Gain (14) 42 0 9 42 23 0 51 62 113 Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake

Gain (44) (14) 154 2,315 198 2,329 0 2,469 3,129 5,598 

Total (58) (14) 163 2,357 221 2,371 0 2,520 3,191 5,711 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Baltimore-Towson, MD Metropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - MD Close/Realign (3) 0 (121) (3) (121) 0 0 (124) (118) (242) Aberdeen Proving Ground Gain (3,862) (290) (3,411) 5,371 451 5,661 216 2,176 2,814 4,990 Fort Meade Gain (2) 0 682 2,915 684 2,915 1,764 5,361 4,875 10,236 Martin State Airport Air Guard Station

Realign (17) 0 (106) (17) (106) 0 0 (123) (114) (237) 

Naval Station Annapolis Realign 0 0 (13) 0 (13) 0 0 (13) (12) (25) 

Total (3,884) (530) (2,749) 8,046 1,135 8,576 1,980 7,277 7,445 14,722 

Bangor, ME Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Reserve Center, Bangor Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) Bangor International Airport Air Guard Station 

Gain 0 195 0 45 195 45 0 240 173 413 

Total (7) 195 0 38 195 45 0 233 171 404 

Barnstable Town, MA Metropolitan Statistical AreaOtis Air Guard Base Close (62) 0 (443) (62) (443) 0 0 (505) (322) (827) 

Total (62) 0 (443) (62) (443) 0 0 (505) (322) (827) 

Baton Rouge, LA Metropolitan Statistical AreaBaton Rouge Army National Guard Reserve Center

Close (128) 0 0 (117) 0 11 0 (117) (57) (174) 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Baton Rouge

Close (18) 0 0 (18) 0 0 0 (18) (8) (26) 

Roberts U.S. Army Reserve Center, Baton Rouge 

Close (30) 0 0 (30) 0 0 0 (30) (14) (44) 

Total (176) 0 0 (165) 0 11 0 (165) (79) (244) 

Battle Creek, MI Metropolitan Statistical AreaW. K. Kellogg Airport Air Guard Station 

Close (68) 0 (206) (68) (206) 0 0 (274) (166) (440) 

Total (68) 0 (206) (68) (206) 0 0 (274) (166) (440) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Orange,TXClose (11) 0 0 (11) 0 0 0 (11) (6) (17) 

Total (11) 0 0 (11) 0 0 0 (11) (6) (17) 

Bethesda-Frederick-Gaithersburg, MD Metropolitan DivisionPFC Flair U.S. Army Reserve Center, Frederick 

Close (20) 0 (2) (20) (2) 0 0 (22) (15) (37) 

Fort Detrick Gain 0 43 0 76 43 76 (15) 104 81 185 National Naval Medical Center Bethesda

Gain 0 936 0 982 936 982 (29) 1,889 1,529 3,418 

Naval Surface Weapons Station Carderock

Gain 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 6 5 11 

Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi

Realign 0 0 (43) 0 (43) 0 0 (43) (39) (82) 

I-270 Corridor Realign (16) 0 (35) (16) (35) 0 0 (51) (38) (89) 

Total (36) 985 (80) 1,022 905 1,058 (44) 1,883 1,523 3,406 

Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Hanna Army National Guard Reserve Center Birmingham

Close (28) 0 0 (28) 0 0 0 (28) (12) (40) 

Birmingham Armed Forces Reserve Center

Realign (146) 0 (159) (146) (159) 0 0 (305) (193) (498) 

Birmingham International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (66) 0 (117) (66) (117) 0 0 (183) (124) (307) 

Total (240) 0 (276) (240) (276) 0 0 (516) (329) (845) 

Bloomsburg-Berwick, PA Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Bloomsburg

Close (20) 0 (2) (20) (2) 0 0 (22) (12) (34) 

Total (20) 0 (2) (20) (2) 0 0 (22) (12) (34) 

Boise City-Nampa, ID Metropolitan Statistical AreaBoise Air Terminal Air Guard Station

Realign (22) 1 (62) (22) (61) 0 0 (83) (73) (156) 

Total (22) 1 (62) (22) (61) 0 0 (83) (73) (156) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Boston-Quincy, MA Metropolitan DivisionNaval Shipyard Puget SoundBoston Detachment Realign 0 0 (108) 0 (108) 0 0 (108) (105) (213) 

Total 0 0 (108) 0 (108) 0 0 (108) (105) (213) 

Bremerton-Silverdale, WA Metropolitan Statistical AreaHuman Resources Support Center Northwest

Gain 0 23 0 0 23 0 0 23 24 47 

Naval Station Bremerton Gain 0 1,401 0 0 1,401 0 0 1,401 1,475 2,876 Submarine Base Bangor Realign 0 0 (1) 0 (1) 0 0 (1) (1) (2) 

Total 0 (1) 0 1,423 0 1,424 0 1,423 1,498 2,921 

Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Metropolitan Statistical AreaTurner U.S. Army Reserve Center, Fairfield 

Close (13) 0 (4) (13) (4) 0 0 (17) (10) (27) 

Total (13) 0 (4) (13) (4) 0 0 (17) (10) (27) 

Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Niagara Falls

Close (1) 0 0 (1) 0 0 0 (1) 0 (1) 

Navy Recruiting District Headquarters Buffalo

Close (25) 0 (6) (25) (6) 0 (6) (37) (16) (53) 

Niagara Falls International Airport Air Guard Station 

Close (115) 0 (527) (115) (527) 0 0 (642) (430) (1,072) 

Total (141) 0 (533) (141) (533) 0 (6) (680) (446) (1,126) 

Burlington-South Burlington, VT Metropolitan Statistical AreaBurlington International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 53 0 3 53 3 0 56 39 95 

Total 0 53 0 3 53 3 0 56 39 95 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan DivisionMalony U.S. Army Reserve CenteClose r (100) 0 (55) (100) (55) 0 0 (155) (87) (242) Hanscom Air Force Base Gain (47) 828 (223) 499 605 546 0 1,104 662 1,766 Natick Soldier Systems Center Realign 0 0 (19) 0 (19) 0 0 (19) (12) (31) 

Total (147) 828 (297) 399 531 546 0 930 563 1,493 

Camden, NJ Metropolitan DivisionSFC Nelson V. Brittin U.S. Army Reserve Center

Close (34) 0 (1) (34) (1) 0 0 (35) (29) (64) 

Fort Dix Gain 0 144 0 209 144 209 0 353 326 679 McGuire Air Force Base Gain 0 37 0 498 37 498 0 535 450 985 

Total (34) 181 (1) 673 180 707 0 853 747 1,600 

Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO-IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Cape Girardeau

Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (1) (8) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (1) (8) 

Carbondale, IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Carbondale 

Close (32) 0 0 (32) 0 0 0 (32) (17) (49) 

Total (32) 0 0 (32) 0 0 0 (32) (17) (49) 

Cedar Rapids, IA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Cedar Rapds

Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Chambersburg, PA Micropolitan Statistical AreaLetterkenny Army Depot Gain 0 409 0 0 409 0 0 409 223 632 

Total 0 409 0 0 409 0 0 409 223 632 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Charleston, WV Metropolitan Statistical AreaYeager Airport Air Guard StationRealign (27) 0 (129) (27) (129) 0 0 (156) (89) (245) 

Total (27) 0 (129) (27) (129) 0 0 (156) (89) (245) 

Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Charleston

Close 0 0 (368) 0 (368) 0 0 (368) (607) (975) 

South Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Close (6) 0 (492) (6) (492) 0 (45) (543) (890) (1,433) 

Naval Weapons Station Charleston

Realign (170) 24 (149) (125) (125) 45 0 (250) (379) (629) 

Total (176) 24 (1,009) (131) (985) 45 (45) (1,161) (1,876) (3,037) 

Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC Metropolitan Statistical AreaCharlotte/Douglas International Airport

Gain 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 6 2 8 

Total 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 6 2 8 

Cheyenne, WY Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy Aviation Support Facility Cheyenne 

Close (23) 0 0 (23) 0 0 0 (23) (10) (33) 

Cheyenne Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 58 0 21 58 21 0 79 48 127 

Total (23) 58 0 (2) 58 21 0 56 38 94 

Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL Metropolitan DivisionNavy Reserve Center Forest ParkClose (15) 0 0 (15) 0 0 0 (15) (4) (19) 

Total (15) 0 0 (15) 0 0 0 (15) (4) (19) 

Clarksville, TN-KY Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Campbell Realign (433) 9 0 (360) 9 73 0 (351) (252) (603) 

Total (433) 9 0 (360) 9 73 0 (351) (252) (603) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Cleveland

Close (24) 0 (1) (24) (1) 0 0 (25) (8) (33) 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Cleveland

Realign (15) 0 (1,013) (15) (1,013) 0 0 (1,028) (847) (1,875) 

Total (39) 0 (1,014) (39) (1,014) 0 0 (1,053) (855) (1,908) 

Clovis, NM Micropolitan Statistical AreaCannon Air Force Base Close (2,385) 0 (384) (2,385) (384) 0 (55) (2,824) (1,955) (4,779) 

Total (2,385) 0 (384) (2,385) (384) 0 (55) (2,824) (1,955) (4,779) 

Colorado Springs, CO Metropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - CO Close/Realign 0 0 (11) 0 (11) 0 0 (11) (11) (22) Fort Carson Gain 0 199 0 4,178 199 4,178 0 4,377 3,310 7,687 Peterson Air Force Base Gain 0 19 (27) 482 (8) 482 36 510 375 885 Schriever Air Force Base Gain 0 51 0 44 51 44 0 95 85 180 United States Air Force AcademyRealign (30) 0 (9) (30) (9) 0 (1) (40) (32) (72) 

Total (30) 269 (47) 4,674 222 4,704 35 4,931 3,727 8,658 

Columbia, SC Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Jackson Gain 0 180 0 435 180 435 0 615 368 983 McEntire Air Guard Station Gain 0 8 0 418 8 418 0 426 260 686 

Total 0 188 0 853 188 853 0 1,041 628 1,669 

Columbus, GA-AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Columbus

Close (9) 0 0 (9) 0 0 0 (9) (5) (14) 

Fort Benning Gain (842) 687 (69) 9,221 618 10,063 0 9,839 4,003 13,842 

Total (851) 687 (69) 9,212 618 10,063 0 9,830 3,998 13,828 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Columbus, MS Micropolitan Statistical AreaColumbus Air Force Base Gain 0 3 0 104 3 104 0 107 70 177 

Total 0 3 0 104 3 104 0 107 70 177 

Columbus, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Columbus 

Close (31) 0 0 (31) 0 0 0 (31) (16) (47) 

Total (31) 0 0 (31) 0 0 0 (31) (16) (47) 

Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Westerville

Close (12) 0 0 (12) 0 0 0 (12) (4) (16) 

U.S. Army Reserve Center Whitehall 

Close (25) 0 0 (25) 0 0 0 (25) (9) (34) 

Leased Space - OH Close/Realign 0 0 (187) 0 (187) 0 0 (187) (153) (340) Defense Supply Center ColumbusGain (2) (960) 63 1,695 65 2,655 0 1,758 1,412 3,170 Rickenbacker International Airport Air Guard Station 

Gain 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 

Rickenbacker Army National Guard Bldg 943 Columbus

Realign (4) 0 0 (4) 0 0 0 (4) (1) (5) 

Total (43) (1,147) 22 1,509 65 2,656 0 1,531 1,245 2,776 

Corpus Christi, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Station Ingleside Close (1,901) 0 (260) (1,901) (260) 0 (57) (2,218) (2,582) (4,800) Corpus Christi Army Depot Realign 0 0 (92) 0 (92) 0 0 (92) (132) (224) Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Realign (926) 0 (89) (926) (89) 0 (10) (1,025) (1,183) (2,208) 

Total (2,827) 0 (441) (2,827) (441) 0 (67) (3,335) (3,897) (7,232) 

Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center # 2 Dallas 

Close (90) 0 0 (90) 0 0 0 (90) (48) (138) 

Army National Guard Reserve Center California Crossing 

Close (47) 0 0 (47) 0 0 0 (47) (25) (72) 

Total (137) 0 0 (137) 0 0 0 (137) (73) (210) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaRock Island Arsenal Realign (3) 120 (1,537) 154 (1,417) 157 0 (1,263) (1,171) (2,434) 

Total (3) 120 (1,537) 154 (1,417) 157 0 (1,263) (1,171) (2,434) 

Dayton, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Dayton

Close 0 0 (230) 0 (230) 0 0 (230) (194) (424) 

Wright Patterson Air Force BaseGain (69) 559 (729) 589 (170) 658 75 494 376 870 Glenn Research Center Realign 0 0 (50) 0 (50) 0 0 (50) (42) (92) 

Total (69) 559 (1,009) 589 (450) 658 75 214 140 354 

Del Rio, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaLaughlin Air Force Base Gain 0 80 0 102 80 102 0 182 137 319 

Total 0 80 0 102 80 102 0 182 137 319 

Denver-Aurora, CO Metropolitan Statistical AreaBuckley Air Force Base Gain 0 81 0 13 81 13 0 94 78 172 Air Reserve Personnel Center Realign (159) 1,500 (1,447) (102) 53 57 (59) (108) (54) (162) 

Total (159) (1,447) (89) 134 70 1,581 (59) (14) 24 10 

Des Moines, IA Metropolitan Statistical AreaDes Moines International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain (31) 196 (172) 23 24 54 0 47 27 74 

Armed Forces Reserve Center Camp Dodge 

Realign (217) 0 (1) (217) (1) 0 0 (218) (84) (302) 

Total (248) 196 (173) (194) 23 54 0 (171) (57) (228) 

Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan DivisionDetroit Arsenal Gain (4) 751 (104) 0 647 4 0 647 407 1,054 

Total (4) 751 (104) 0 647 4 0 647 407 1,054 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Dover, DE Metropolitan Statistical AreaDover Air Force Base Gain 0 133 0 115 133 115 0 248 254 502 

Total 0 133 0 115 133 115 0 248 254 502 

Dubuque, IA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Dubuque

Close (19) 0 (5) (19) (5) 0 0 (24) (8) (32) 

Total (19) 0 (5) (19) (5) 0 0 (24) (8) (32) 

Duluth, MN-WI Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Duluth Close (8) 0 0 (8) 0 0 0 (8) (2) (10) 

Total (8) 0 0 (8) 0 0 0 (8) (2) (10) 

Durham, NC Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy Research Office, Durham Realign (1) 0 (113) (1) (113) 0 0 (114) (67) (181) 

Total (1) 0 (113) (1) (113) 0 0 (114) (67) (181) 

Edison, NJ Metropolitan DivisionFort Monmouth Close (620) 0 (4,652) (620) (4,652) 0 0 (5,272) (4,465) (9,737) Kilmer U.S. Army Reserve Center, Edison 

Close (23) 0 (21) (23) (21) 0 0 (44) (31) (75) 

Naval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst

Realign (132) 0 (54) (132) (54) 0 0 (186) (123) (309) 

Naval Weapons Station Earle Realign 0 0 (63) 2 (63) 2 0 (61) (54) (115) 

Total (775) 0 (4,790) (773) (4,790) 2 0 (5,563) (4,673) (10,236) 

El Dorado, AR Micropolitan Statistical AreaEl Dorado Armed Forces Reserve Center

Close (24) 0 0 (24) 0 0 0 (24) (12) (36) 

Total (24) 0 0 (24) 0 0 0 (24) (12) (36) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

El Paso, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center (Hondo Pass) El Paso 

Close (106) 0 0 (106) 0 0 0 (106) (81) (187) 

Fort Bliss Gain (4,564) 370 (223) 11,354 147 15,918 0 11,501 8,882 20,383 

Total (4,670) 370 (223) 11,248 147 15,918 0 11,395 8,801 20,196 

Elizabethtown, KY Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Knox Realign (10,159) (772) (4,867) 1,739 5,292 2,511 184 (2,944) 8 (2,936) 

Total (10,159) (772) (4,867) 1,739 5,292 2,511 184 (2,944) 8 (2,936) 

Elmira, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center HorseheadClose (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (6) (13) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (6) (13) 

Enid, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaVance Air Force Base Gain 0 6 0 93 6 93 0 99 94 193 

Total 0 6 0 93 6 93 0 99 94 193 

Enterprise-Ozark, AL Micropolitan Statistical AreaGary U.S. Army Reserve Center Enterprize

Close (9) 0 (1) (9) (1) 0 0 (10) (8) (18) 

Fort Rucker Gain (423) 234 (80) 1,734 154 2,157 0 1,888 1,689 3,577 

Total (432) 234 (81) 1,725 153 2,157 0 1,878 1,681 3,559 

Evansville, IN-KY Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Evansville Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (1) (8) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (1) (8) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Fairbanks, AK Metropolitan Statistical AreaEielson Air Force Base Realign (2,821) 0 (319) (2,821) (319) 0 200 (2,940) (1,770) (4,710) 

Total (2,821) 0 (319) (2,821) (319) 0 200 (2,940) (1,770) (4,710) 

Fairmont, WV Micropolitan Statistical AreaFairmont U.S. Army Reserve Center

Close (88) 0 0 (88) 0 0 0 (88) (47) (135) 

Total (88) 0 0 (88) 0 0 0 (88) (47) (135) 

Fallon, NV Micropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Air Station Fallon Realign (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (5) (12) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (5) (12) 

Fayetteville, NC Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Bragg Gain (1,352) 247 0 4,078 247 5,430 0 4,325 2,915 7,240 Pope Air Force Base Realign (5,969) 1,153 (345) (4,821) 808 1,148 (132) (4,145) (2,657) (6,802) 

Total (7,321) (345) (743) 1,055 6,578 1,400 (132) 180 258 438 

Fort Leonard Wood, MO Micropolitan Statistical AreaFort Leonard Wood Realign (181) 25 (2) (110) 23 71 0 (87) (14) (101) 

Total (181) 25 (2) (110) 23 71 0 (87) (14) (101) 

Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Smith Regional Realign (19) 0 (59) (19) (59) 0 0 (78) (56) (134) 

Total (19) 0 (59) (19) (59) 0 0 (78) (56) (134) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Fort Walton Beach-Crestview-Destin, FL Metropolitan Statistical AreaEglin Air Force Base Gain (28) 120 (42) 2,140 78 2,168 0 2,218 1,834 4,052 Hurlburt Field Realign (48) 0 (6) (48) (6) 0 0 (54) (44) (98) 

Total (76) 120 (48) 2,092 72 2,168 0 2,164 1,790 3,954 

Fort Wayne, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Wayne International Airport Air Guard Station 

Gain (5) 256 0 57 256 62 0 313 173 486 

Total (5) 256 0 57 256 62 0 313 173 486 

Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan DivisionCarswell ARS, Naval Air Station Fo

Gain 0 116 (12) 8 104 8 0 112 116 228 

Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Ft. Worth

Gain (54) 41 (5) 276 36 330 2 314 197 511 

Total (54) 157 (17) 284 140 338 2 426 313 739 

Fresno, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaFresno Air Terminal Gain 0 254 0 57 254 57 0 311 207 518 

Total 0 254 0 57 254 57 0 311 207 518 

Glens Falls, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Glenn FallsClose (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (1) (8) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (1) (8) 

Goldsboro, NC Metropolitan Statistical AreaSeymore Johnson Air Force BaseGain 0 17 0 345 17 345 0 362 301 663 

Total 0 17 0 345 17 345 0 362 301 663 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Grand Forks, ND-MN Metropolitan Statistical AreaGrand Forks Air Force Base Realign (2,290) 0 (355) (2,290) (355) 0 0 (2,645) (2,284) (4,929) 

Total (2,290) 0 (355) (2,290) (355) 0 0 (2,645) (2,284) (4,929) 

Grand Island, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Grand Island 

Close (31) 0 0 (31) 0 0 0 (31) (16) (47) 

Total (31) 0 0 (31) 0 0 0 (31) (16) (47) 

Great Falls, MT Metropolitan Statistical AreaGalt Hall U.S. Army Reserve Center, Great Falls

Close (14) 0 (3) (14) (3) 0 0 (17) (9) (26) 

Great Falls International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (26) 0 (81) (26) (81) 0 0 (107) (66) (173) 

Total (40) 0 (84) (40) (84) 0 0 (124) (75) (199) 

Guam County, GUAndersen Air Force Base Realign (64) 0 (31) (64) (31) 0 0 (95) (79) (174) 

Total (64) 0 (31) (64) (31) 0 0 (95) (79) (174) 

Gulfport-Biloxi, MS Metropolitan Statistical AreaHuman Resources Support Center Southeast

Realign 0 0 (138) 0 (138) 0 (10) (148) (131) (279) 

Keesler Air Force Base Realign (181) 0 (31) (181) (31) 0 (190) (402) (248) (650) 

Total (181) 0 (169) (181) (169) 0 (200) (550) (379) (929) 

Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV Metropolitan Statistical AreaEwvra Sheppard Air Guard StationGain 0 3 0 7 3 7 0 10 7 17 

Total 0 3 0 7 3 7 0 10 7 17 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Hanford-Corcoran, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Air Station Lemore Gain (39) 35 0 5 35 44 0 40 32 72 

Total (39) 35 0 5 35 44 0 40 32 72 

Hardin County, OHParrott U.S. Army Reserve Center Kenton

Close (9) 0 (1) (9) (1) 0 0 (10) (5) (15) 

Total (9) 0 (1) (9) (1) 0 0 (10) (5) (15) 

Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Distribution Depot Susquehanna

Realign 0 0 (15) 0 (15) 0 0 (15) (13) (28) 

Naval Support Activity Mechanicsburg

Realign 0 0 (11) 0 (11) 0 0 (11) (10) (21) 

Total 0 0 (26) 0 (26) 0 0 (26) (23) (49) 

Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Area Maintenance Support Facility 

Close (13) 0 (5) (13) (5) 0 0 (18) (8) (26) 

Bradley International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (23) 15 (88) 3 (73) 26 0 (70) (54) (124) 

Total (36) 15 (93) (10) (78) 26 0 (88) (62) (150) 

Hilton Head Island-Beaufort, SC Micropolitan Statistical AreaMarine Corps Air Station BeaufortGain 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 12 9 21 

Total 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 12 9 21 

Honolulu, HI Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Station Pearl Harbor Gain (29) 324 (213) (29) 111 0 0 82 89 171 Hickam Air Force Base Realign (311) 7 (117) (152) (110) 159 0 (262) (224) (486) 

Total (340) 331 (330) (181) 1 159 0 (180) (135) (315) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Hot Springs County, WYArmy National Guard Reserve Center Thermopolis

Close (19) 0 0 (19) 0 0 0 (19) (10) (29) 

Total (19) 0 0 (19) 0 0 0 (19) (10) (29) 

Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Ellington 

Close (14) 0 (45) (14) (45) 0 0 (59) (41) (100) 

U.S. Army Reserve Center # 2 Houston

Close (2) 0 0 (2) 0 0 0 (2) 0 (2) 

Ellington Field Air Guard Station Realign 0 0 (3) 0 (3) 0 0 (3) (2) (5) 

Total (16) 0 (48) (16) (48) 0 0 (64) (43) (107) 

Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaBias U.S. Army Reserve Center, Huntington

Close (1) 0 0 (1) 0 0 0 (1) 0 (1) 

Total (1) 0 0 (1) 0 0 0 (1) 0 (1) 

Huntsville, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaRedstone Arsenal Gain (1,322) 1,874 (288) (986) 1,586 336 1,055 1,655 1,289 2,944 

Total (1,322) (288) (986) 1,586 336 1,874 1,055 1,655 1,289 2,944 

Indianapolis, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Recruiting District Headquarters Indianapolis

Close (27) 0 (5) (27) (5) 0 (6) (38) (15) (53) 

U.S. Army Reserve Center SestonClose (12) 0 0 (12) 0 0 0 (12) (4) (16) Leased Space - IN Close/Realign (25) 0 (111) (25) (111) 0 0 (136) (89) (225) Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Indianapolis

Gain 0 (100) 114 3,378 114 3,478 3 3,495 2,490 5,985 

Total (64) (216) 50 3,262 114 3,478 (3) 3,309 2,382 5,691 

Jackson, MS Metropolitan Statistical AreaJackson International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 

Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Jacksonville, FL Metropolitan Statistical AreaJacksonville International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 22 (6) 45 16 45 0 61 74 135 

Naval Air Station Jacksonville Gain (72) 310 (245) 1,902 65 1,974 58 2,025 2,370 4,395 Naval Station Mayport Gain (6) 13 0 397 13 403 0 410 480 890 

Total (78) 345 (251) 2,344 94 2,422 58 2,496 2,924 5,420 

Jacksonville, NC Metropolitan Statistical AreaMarine Corps Base Camp LejeunRealign e (182) 15 (16) (182) (1) 0 (9) (192) (109) (301) 

Total (182) 15 (16) (182) (1) 0 (9) (192) (109) (301) 

Johnston County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Tishomingo

Close (30) 0 0 (30) 0 0 0 (30) (16) (46) 

Total (30) 0 0 (30) 0 0 0 (30) (16) (46) 

Johnstown, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaMarine Corps Reserve Center Johnstown

Realign (86) 0 0 (86) 0 0 0 (86) (52) (138) 

Total (86) 0 0 (86) 0 0 0 (86) (52) (138) 

Kansas City, MO-KS Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Kansas City

Close (37) 0 (576) (37) (576) 0 0 (613) (549) (1,162) 

Marine Corps Support Center Kansas City

Close (191) 0 (139) (191) (139) 0 (3) (333) (250) (583) 

Navy Recruiting District Headquarters Kansas

Close (21) 0 (6) (21) (6) 0 (6) (33) (23) (56) 

Fort Leavenworth Gain (16) 8 0 195 8 211 0 203 131 334 

Total (265) 8 (721) (54) (713) 211 (9) (776) (691) (1,467) 

Kapaa, HI Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Honokaa 

Close (118) 0 0 (118) 0 0 0 (118) (100) (218) 

Total (118) 0 0 (118) 0 0 0 (118) (100) (218) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Kearney, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Kearny

Close (8) 0 0 (8) 0 0 0 (8) (4) (12) 

Total (8) 0 0 (8) 0 0 0 (8) (4) (12) 

Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Hood Realign (9,135) 0 (118) (73) (118) 9,062 0 (191) (163) (354) 

Total (9,135) 0 (118) (73) (118) 9,062 0 (191) (163) (354) 

King George County, VANaval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren

Realign 0 169 (503) 0 (334) 0 (17) (351) (424) (775) 

Total 0 169 (503) 0 (334) 0 (17) (351) (424) (775) 

Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Area Maintenance Support Facility 

Close (30) 0 (2) (30) (2) 0 0 (32) (7) (39) 

Total (30) 0 (2) (30) (2) 0 0 (32) (7) (39) 

Knoxville, TN Metropolitan Statistical AreaMcGee Tyson APT Air Guard Station

Gain 0 190 0 58 190 58 0 248 245 493 

Total 0 190 0 58 190 58 0 248 245 493 

La Crosse, WI-MN Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center La Crosse 

Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Lafayette, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Lafeyette 

Close (21) 0 0 (21) 0 0 0 (21) (11) (32) 

Total (21) 0 0 (21) 0 0 0 (21) (11) (32) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metropolitan DivisionFort Sheridan Realign (17) 0 (17) (17) (17) 0 0 (34) (53) (87) Naval Station Great Lakes Realign (2,005) 101 (124) (1,989) (23) 16 (10) (2,022) (2,577) (4,599) 

Total (2,022) 101 (141) (2,006) (40) 16 (10) (2,056) (2,630) (4,686) 

Lansing-East Lansing, MI Metropolitan Statistical AreaParisan U.S. Army Reserve Center, Lansing 

Close (25) 0 0 (25) 0 0 0 (25) (11) (36) 

Total (25) 0 0 (25) 0 0 0 (25) (11) (36) 

Las Cruces, NM Metropolitan Statistical AreaWhite Sands Missile Range Realign (13) 0 (165) (13) (165) 0 0 (178) (190) (368) 

Total (13) 0 (165) (13) (165) 0 0 (178) (190) (368) 

Las Vegas-Paradise, NV Metropolitan Statistical AreaNellis Air Force Base Gain (265) 268 (5) 1,149 263 1,414 0 1,412 959 2,371 

Total (265) 268 (5) 1,149 263 1,414 0 1,412 959 2,371 

Lawton, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Sill Gain (892) 337 (176) 3,444 161 4,336 (3) 3,602 2,129 5,731 

Total (892) 337 (176) 3,444 161 4,336 (3) 3,602 2,129 5,731 

Lewisburg, PA Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Lewisburg

Close (9) 0 (2) (9) (2) 0 0 (11) (6) (17) 

Total (9) 0 (2) (9) (2) 0 0 (11) (6) (17) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Lexington Park, MD Micropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Patuxent River

Close 0 0 (53) 0 (53) 0 0 (53) (70) (123) 

Naval Air Station Patuxent River Gain (10) 226 (142) (3) 84 7 6 87 114 201 Fort Lewis Realign 0 0 (164) 0 (164) 0 0 (164) (217) (381) 

Total (10) 226 (359) (3) (133) 7 6 (130) (173) (303) 

Lexington-Fayette, KY Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Lexington

Close (5) 0 (40) (5) (40) 0 0 (45) (27) (72) 

Navy Reserve Center Lexington Close (9) 0 0 (9) 0 0 0 (9) (2) (11) 

Total (14) 0 (40) (14) (40) 0 0 (54) (29) (83) 

Lincoln, NE Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Lincoln Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (3) (10) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (3) (10) 

Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaLittle Rock Air Force Base Gain (16) 319 0 3,579 319 3,595 0 3,898 2,958 6,856 Camp Pike (90th) Realign (86) 0 (91) (86) (91) 0 0 (177) (158) (335) 

Total (102) 319 (91) 3,493 228 3,595 0 3,721 2,800 6,521 

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan DivisionArmed Forces Reserve Center Bell 

Close (72) 0 0 (24) 0 48 0 (24) (11) (35) 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center, Encino

Close (33) 0 0 (33) 0 0 0 (33) (15) (48) 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center, Los Angeles

Close (48) 0 0 (48) 0 0 0 (48) (22) (70) 

Leased Space - CA Close/Realign (2) 0 (14) (2) (14) 0 0 (16) (13) (29) Marine Corps Reserve Center Pasadena CA

Gain 0 0 0 25 0 25 0 25 11 36 

Total (155) 0 (14) (82) (14) 73 0 (96) (50) (146) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Louisville, KY-IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Louisville 

Close (30) 0 (13) (30) (13) 0 0 (43) (22) (65) 

Louisville International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 6 4 10 

Navy Recruiting Command Louisville

Realign (6) 0 (217) (6) (217) 0 0 (223) (165) (388) 

Total (36) 6 (230) (36) (224) 0 0 (260) (183) (443) 

Lubbock, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Lubbock, TX

Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Lufkin, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Lufkin 

Close (10) 0 0 (10) 0 0 0 (10) (5) (15) 

Total (10) 0 0 (10) 0 0 0 (10) (5) (15) 

Madison, WI Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Madison

Close (23) 0 (3) (23) (3) 0 0 (26) (11) (37) 

Olson U.S. Army Reserve Center, Madison

Close (113) 0 0 (113) 0 0 0 (113) (42) (155) 

U.S. Army Reserve Center O'Connell

Close (11) 0 (1) (11) (1) 0 0 (12) (4) (16) 

Armed Forces Reserve Center Madison

Gain 0 8 0 40 8 40 0 48 21 69 

Dane County Airport Gain (4) 37 0 18 37 22 0 55 35 90 

Total (151) 45 (4) (89) 41 62 0 (48) (1) (49) 

Manhattan, KS Micropolitan Statistical AreaFort Riley Gain 0 440 0 2,415 440 2,415 0 2,855 1,818 4,673 

Total 0 440 0 2,415 440 2,415 0 2,855 1,818 4,673 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Mansfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Mansfield 

Close (59) 0 (2) (59) (2) 0 0 (61) (57) (118) 

Mansfield Lahm Municipal Airport Air Guard Station

Close (63) 0 (171) (63) (171) 0 0 (234) (294) (528) 

Total (122) 0 (173) (122) (173) 0 0 (295) (351) (646) 

Marquette, MI Micropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Marquette Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (1) (8) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (1) (8) 

Marshall, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Marshall

Close (15) 0 (1) (15) (1) 0 0 (16) (8) (24) 

Total (15) 0 (1) (15) (1) 0 0 (16) (8) (24) 

Martin County, INNaval Support Activity Crane Realign 0 0 (672) 0 (672) 0 (11) (683) (308) (991) 

Total 0 0 (672) 0 (672) 0 (11) (683) (308) (991) 

Maysville, KY Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Maysville 

Close (16) 0 (2) (16) (2) 0 0 (18) (10) (28) 

Total (16) 0 (2) (16) (2) 0 0 (18) (10) (28) 

Medford, OR Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Central Point

Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Memphis, TN-MS-AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaMemphis International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 6 0 2 6 2 0 8 5 13 

Naval Support Activity Mid SouthGain 0 601 0 372 601 372 88 1,061 668 1,729 

Total 0 607 0 374 607 374 88 1,069 673 1,742 

Meridian, MS Micropolitan Statistical AreaKey Field Air Guard Station Realign (33) 0 (142) (33) (142) 0 0 (175) (163) (338) Naval Air Station Meridian Realign (15) 0 0 (15) 0 0 (1) (16) (13) (29) 

Total (48) 0 (142) (48) (142) 0 (1) (191) (176) (367) 

Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metropolitan DivisionHomestead Air Reserve Station Gain 0 83 (12) 0 71 0 0 71 70 141 

Total 0 83 (12) 0 71 0 0 71 70 141 

Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI Metropolitan Statistical AreaGen Mitchell International Airport ARS 

Close (44) 56 (302) (20) (246) 24 0 (266) (214) (480) 

Total (44) 56 (302) (20) (246) 24 0 (266) (214) (480) 

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Snelling Realign (130) 0 (124) (130) (124) 0 0 (254) (155) (409) 

Total (130) 0 (124) (130) (124) 0 0 (254) (155) (409) 

Mobile, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Mobile 

Close (27) 0 0 (5) 0 22 0 (5) (2) (7) 

Fort Ganey Army National Guard Reserve Center Mobile

Close (13) 0 0 (13) 0 0 0 (13) (5) (18) 

Wright U.S. Army Reserve Center Close (8) 0 (1) (8) (1) 0 0 (9) (4) (13) 

Total (48) 0 (1) (26) (1) 22 0 (27) (11) (38) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Modesto, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaRiverbank Army Ammunition PlantClose 0 0 (4) 0 (4) 0 (85) (89) (17) (106) 

Total 0 0 (4) 0 (4) 0 (85) (89) (17) (106) 

Monroe County, WIFort McCoy Realign (379) 133 (82) (282) 51 97 0 (231) (133) (364) 

Total (379) 133 (82) (282) 51 97 0 (231) (133) (364) 

Montgomery, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaBG William P. Screws U.S. Army Reserve Center Montgomery

Close (15) 0 (3) (15) (3) 0 0 (18) (12) (30) 

Navy Recruiting District Headquarters Montgomery

Close (31) 0 (5) (31) (5) 0 (5) (41) (27) (68) 

The Adjutant General Bldg, AL Army National Guard Montgomery

Close (85) 0 0 (85) 0 0 0 (85) (56) (141) 

Dannelly Field Air Guard Station Gain 0 42 0 18 42 18 0 60 45 105 Maxwell Air Force Base Realign (740) 0 (511) (740) (511) 0 0 (1,251) (894) (2,145) 

Total (871) 42 (519) (853) (477) 18 (5) (1,335) (944) (2,279) 

Mountain Home, ID Micropolitan Statistical AreaMountain Home Air Force Base Realign (1,235) 23 (54) (538) (31) 697 0 (569) (329) (898) 

Total (1,235) 23 (54) (538) (31) 697 0 (569) (329) (898) 

Muskogee, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Muskogee

Close (14) 0 (2) (14) (2) 0 0 (16) (9) (25) 

Total (14) 0 (2) (14) (2) 0 0 (16) (9) (25) 

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro, TN Metropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - TN Close/Realign 0 0 (6) 0 (6) 0 0 (6) (4) (10) Nashville International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (19) 0 (172) (19) (172) 0 0 (191) (137) (328) 

Total (19) 0 (178) (19) (178) 0 0 (197) (141) (338) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan DivisionArmed Forces Reserve Center Amityville 

Close (24) 0 (4) (24) (4) 0 0 (28) (8) (36) 

Total (24) 0 (4) (24) (4) 0 0 (28) (8) (36) 

New Bern, NC Micropolitan Statistical AreaMarine Corps Air Station Cherry Point

Realign (16) 8 (664) 48 (656) 64 (20) (628) (558) (1,186) 

Total (16) 8 (664) 48 (656) 64 (20) (628) (558) (1,186) 

New Haven-Milford, CT Metropolitan Statistical AreaSGT Libby U.S. Army Reserve Center, New Haven

Close (14) 0 (7) (14) (7) 0 0 (21) (12) (33) 

Total (14) 0 (7) (14) (7) 0 0 (21) (12) (33) 

New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Support Activity New Orleans

Close (1,997) 0 (652) (1,997) (652) 0 (62) (2,711) (2,016) (4,727) 

Leased Space - Slidell Close/Realign (1) 0 (102) (1) (102) 0 (48) (151) (144) (295) Naval Air Station New Orleans Gain 0 446 0 1,407 446 1,407 3 1,856 1,372 3,228 Naval Air Station New Orleans Air Reserve Station

Realign (4) 76 (308) 41 (232) 45 0 (191) (207) (398) 

Total (2,002) 522 (1,062) (550) (540) 1,452 (107) (1,197) (995) (2,192) 

New York-Wayne-White Plains, NY-NJ Metropolitan DivisionFort Totten / Pyle Realign (75) 0 (74) (75) (74) 0 0 (149) (72) (221) 

Total (75) 0 (74) (75) (74) 0 0 (149) (72) (221) 

Newark-Union, NJ-PA Metropolitan DivisionPicatinny Arsenal Gain 0 688 0 5 688 5 0 693 566 1,259 

Total 0 688 0 5 688 5 0 693 566 1,259 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Norwich-New London, CT Metropolitan Statistical AreaSubmarine Base New London Close (7,096) 0 (952) (7,096) (952) 0 (412) (8,460) (7,353) (15,813) 

Total (7,096) 0 (952) (7,096) (952) 0 (412) (8,460) (7,353) (15,813) 

Oak Harbor, WA Micropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Air Station Whidbey IslandGain (34) 173 0 (34) 173 0 0 139 162 301 

Total (34) 173 0 (34) 173 0 0 139 162 301 

Oakland-Fremont-Hayward, CA Metropolitan DivisionDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Oakland

Close 0 0 (50) 0 (50) 0 0 (50) (40) (90) 

Camp Parks (91st) Realign (25) 0 (18) (25) (18) 0 0 (43) (26) (69) 

Total (25) 0 (68) (25) (68) 0 0 (93) (66) (159) 

Ogden-Clearfield, UT Metropolitan Statistical AreaHill Air Force Base Realign (13) 24 (447) 278 (423) 291 0 (145) (164) (309) 

Total (13) 24 (447) 278 (423) 291 0 (145) (164) (309) 

Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaKrowse U.S. Army Reserve Center Oklahoma City

Close (78) 0 (6) (78) (6) 0 0 (84) (78) (162) 

Oklahoma City (95th) Close (31) 0 (22) (31) (22) 0 0 (53) (55) (108) Tinker Air Force Base Gain (9) 552 (197) 0 355 9 0 355 450 805 Will Rogers World Airport Air Guard Station

Realign (19) 46 (145) 84 (99) 103 0 (15) (49) (64) 

Total (137) 598 (370) (25) 228 112 0 203 268 471 

Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Recruiting District Headquarters Omaha

Close (19) 0 (7) (19) (7) 0 (6) (32) (28) (60) 

Offutt Air Force Base Realign 0 69 (227) 54 (158) 54 0 (104) (130) (234) 

Total (19) 69 (234) 35 (165) 54 (6) (136) (158) (294) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Orlando, FL Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Orlando

Close (9) 0 (200) (9) (200) 0 0 (209) (204) (413) 

Total (9) 0 (200) (9) (200) 0 0 (209) (204) (413) 

Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaChannel Islands Air Guard StationGain 0 15 0 4 15 4 0 19 23 42 Naval Base Ventura City Realign (244) 854 (2,149) (239) (1,295) 5 0 (1,534) (1,905) (3,439) 

Total (244) 869 (2,149) (235) (1,280) 9 0 (1,515) (1,882) (3,397) 

Paducah, KY-IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Paducah 

Close (31) 0 0 (31) 0 0 0 (31) (16) (47) 

Total (31) 0 0 (31) 0 0 0 (31) (16) (47) 

Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL Metropolitan Statistical AreaPatrick Air Force Base Realign (136) 0 (59) (136) (59) 0 0 (195) (165) (360) 

Total (136) 0 (59) (136) (59) 0 0 (195) (165) (360) 

Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Support Activity Panama City

Realign (12) 0 (12) (12) (12) 0 0 (24) (24) (48) 

Tyndall Air Force Base Realign (48) 0 (19) (37) (19) 11 0 (56) (57) (113) 

Total (60) 0 (31) (49) (31) 11 0 (80) (81) (161) 

Parsons, KS Micropolitan Statistical AreaKansas Army Ammunition Plant Close 0 0 (8) 0 (8) 0 (159) (167) (109) (276) 

Total 0 0 (8) 0 (8) 0 (159) (167) (109) (276) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Pascagoula, MS Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Station Pascagoula Close (844) 0 (112) (844) (112) 0 (7) (963) (798) (1,761) 

Total (844) 0 (112) (844) (112) 0 (7) (963) (798) (1,761) 

Pendleton-Hermiston, OR Micropolitan Statistical AreaUmatilla Army Depot Close (127) 0 (385) (127) (385) 0 0 (512) (372) (884) 

Total (127) 0 (385) (127) (385) 0 0 (512) (372) (884) 

Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Air Station Pensacola Realign (857) 124 (1,304) (302) (1,180) 555 (97) (1,579) (2,521) (4,100) 

Total (857) 124 (1,304) (302) (1,180) 555 (97) (1,579) (2,521) (4,100) 

Peoria, IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaGreater Peoria Regio Gain 0 21 0 13 21 13 0 34 23 57 

Total 0 21 0 13 21 13 0 34 23 57 

Peru, IN Micropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Marine Corps Reserve Center Grissom Air Reserve 

Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (1) (8) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (1) (8) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionBristol Close (9) 0 (2) (9) (2) 0 0 (11) (5) (16) Engineering Field Activity Northeast

Close (4) 0 (188) (4) (188) 0 0 (192) (155) (347) 

Naval Air Station Willow Grove Close (865) 0 (362) (865) (362) 0 (5) (1,232) (698) (1,930) Navy Crane Center Lester Close (1) 0 (54) (1) (54) 0 0 (55) (44) (99) North Penn U.S. Army Reserve Center, Norristown

Close (22) 0 (1) (22) (1) 0 0 (23) (10) (33) 

W. Reese U.S. Army Reserve Center/OMS, Chester

Close (9) 0 (1) (9) (1) 0 0 (10) (4) (14) 

Naval Support Activity Philadelphia

Gain 0 301 (10) 0 291 0 0 291 237 528 

Human Resources Support Center Northeast

Realign 0 0 (174) 0 (174) 0 (9) (183) (148) (331) 

Navy Philadelphia Business Center

Realign 0 0 (63) 0 (63) 0 0 (63) (51) (114) 

Total (910) 301 (855) (910) (554) 0 (14) (1,478) (878) (2,356) 

Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical AreaAir Force Research Lab, Mesa City

Close (42) 0 (46) (42) (46) 0 0 (88) (82) (170) 

Leased Space - AZ Close/Realign 0 0 (1) 0 (1) 0 0 (1) (1) (2) Phoenix Sky Harbor I Gain 0 29 0 10 29 10 0 39 39 78 Luke Air Force Base Realign (101) 0 (177) (101) (177) 0 0 (278) (273) (551) 

Total (143) 29 (224) (133) (195) 10 0 (328) (317) (645) 

Picayune, MS Micropolitan Statistical AreaMississippi Army Ammunition Plant

Close 0 0 (4) 0 (4) 0 (50) (54) (35) (89) 

Total 0 0 (4) 0 (4) 0 (50) (54) (35) (89) 

Pine Bluff, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaStone U.S. Army Reserve Center, Pine Bluff

Close (30) 0 (4) (30) (4) 0 0 (34) (13) (47) 

Total (30) 0 (4) (30) (4) 0 0 (34) (13) (47) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Pittsburgh, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaKelly Support Center Close (174) 0 (136) (174) (136) 0 0 (310) (183) (493) Pittsburgh International Airport Air Reserve Station

Close (44) 0 (278) (44) (278) 0 0 (322) (258) (580) 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Pittsburgh

Gain 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 7 2 9 

Pitt U.S. Army Reserve Center, Corapolis

Realign (119) 0 (101) (119) (101) 0 0 (220) (132) (352) 

Total (337) 0 (515) (330) (515) 7 0 (845) (571) (1,416) 

Pocatello, ID Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Pocatello Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Portland-South Portland-Biddeford ME Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Shipyard Portsmouth Close (201) 0 (4,032) (201) (4,032) 0 (277) (4,510) (4,656) (9,166) Naval Air Station Brunswick Realign (2,317) 0 (61) (2,317) (61) 0 (42) (2,420) (1,846) (4,266) 

Total (2,518) 0 (4,093) (2,518) (4,093) 0 (319) (6,930) (6,502) (13,432) 

Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Metropolitan Statistical AreaVancover Barracks Close (29) 0 (16) (29) (16) 0 0 (45) (27) (72) Portland International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (112) 0 (452) (112) (452) 0 0 (564) (453) (1,017) 

Total (141) 0 (468) (141) (468) 0 0 (609) (480) (1,089) 

Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaCarpenter U.S. Army Reserve Center,Poughkeepie

Close (8) 0 (1) (8) (1) 0 0 (9) (5) (14) 

United States Military Academy Gain 0 38 0 226 38 226 0 264 158 422 

Total (8) 38 (1) 218 37 226 0 255 153 408 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA Metropolitan Statistical AreaHarwood U.S. Army Reserve Center, Providence

Close (20) 0 (4) (20) (4) 0 0 (24) (30) (54) 

USARC Bristol Close (24) 0 0 (24) 0 0 0 (24) (28) (52) Naval Station Newport Gain (122) 309 (225) 525 84 647 (76) 533 654 1,187 Quonset State Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 29 0 17 29 17 0 46 67 113 

Total (166) 338 (229) 498 109 664 (76) 531 663 1,194 

Rapid City, SD Metropolitan Statistical AreaEllsworth Air Force Base Close (3,315) 0 (438) (3,315) (438) 0 (99) (3,852) (2,915) (6,767) 

Total (3,315) 0 (438) (3,315) (438) 0 (99) (3,852) (2,915) (6,767) 

Reading, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Reading

Close (18) 0 0 (18) 0 0 0 (18) (6) (24) 

Total (18) 0 0 (18) 0 0 0 (18) (6) (24) 

Reno-Sparks, NV Metropolitan Statistical AreaHawthorne Army Depot Close (74) 0 (45) (74) (45) 0 (80) (199) (126) (325) Reno-Tahoe International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (23) 0 (124) (23) (124) 0 0 (147) (115) (262) 

Total (97) 0 (169) (97) (169) 0 (80) (346) (241) (587) 

Richmond, VA Metropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - VA Close/Realign 0 0 (215) 0 (215) 0 0 (215) (166) (381) Defense Supply Center RichmondGain 0 83 (77) 0 6 0 0 6 4 10 Fort Lee Gain (392) 1,151 (2) 6,139 1,149 6,531 56 7,344 4,425 11,769 Richmond International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (25) 0 (101) (25) (101) 0 0 (126) (92) (218) 

Total (417) (395) 6,114 839 6,531 1,234 56 7,009 4,171 11,180 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, San Bernardino

Close 0 0 (120) 0 (120) 0 0 (120) (121) (241) 

Naval Support Activity Corona Close (6) 0 (886) (6) (886) 0 0 (892) (904) (1,796) March Air Reserve Base Realign (71) 4 (44) (71) (40) 0 0 (111) (90) (201) Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow

Realign (140) 0 (330) (140) (330) 0 51 (419) (396) (815) 

Total (217) 4 (1,380) (217) (1,376) 0 51 (1,542) (1,511) (3,053) 

Rockingham County-Strafford County, NH Metropolitan DivisionDoble U.S. Army Reserve Center Portsmouth

Close (39) 0 (5) (39) (5) 0 0 (44) (29) (73) 

Armed Forces Reserve Center Pease Air Force Base

Gain 0 28 0 20 28 20 0 48 40 88 

Total (39) 28 (5) (19) 23 20 0 4 11 15 

Rome, GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaInspector/Instructor Rome GA Close (9) 0 0 (9) 0 0 0 (9) (3) (12) 

Total (9) 0 0 (9) 0 0 0 (9) (3) (12) 

Salinas, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Seaside

Close (10) 0 (51) (10) (51) 0 0 (61) (61) (122) 

Fort Hunter Liggett Gain 0 18 0 25 18 25 0 43 41 84 

Total (10) 18 (51) 15 (33) 25 0 (18) (20) (38) 

Salt Lake City, UT Metropolitan Statistical AreaDeseret Chemical Depot Close (186) 0 (62) (186) (62) 0 0 (248) (143) (391) Fort Douglas Realign (15) 0 (38) (15) (38) 0 0 (53) (41) (94) 

Total (201) 0 (100) (201) (100) 0 0 (301) (184) (485) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center New Braunfels 

Close (106) 0 0 (106) 0 0 0 (106) (89) (195) 

Brooks City Base Close (1,297) 0 (1,268) (1,297) (1,268) 0 (358) (2,923) (2,801) (5,724) Defense Finance and Accounting Service, San Antonio

Close (32) 0 (303) (32) (303) 0 0 (335) (367) (702) 

Leased Space - TX Close/Realign (78) 0 (147) (78) (147) 0 0 (225) (230) (455) Fort Sam Houston Gain (117) 1,624 0 7,648 1,624 7,765 92 9,364 8,324 17,688 Randolph Air Force Base Gain (576) 705 (174) (412) 531 164 63 182 300 482 Lackland Air Force Base Realign (2,489) 453 (1,223) (2,254) (770) 235 (116) (3,140) (2,755) (5,895) 

Total (4,695) (3,115) 3,469 (333) 8,164 2,782 (319) 2,817 2,382 5,199 

San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, San Diego

Close (3) 0 (237) (3) (237) 0 0 (240) (256) (496) 

Marine Corps Base Miramar Gain (46) 34 (3) 41 31 87 0 72 70 142 Naval Base Point Loma Gain (12) 350 (341) 300 9 312 0 309 279 588 Naval Station San Diego Gain (1) 86 (2) 1,084 84 1,085 2 1,170 1,066 2,236 Human Resources Support Center Southwest

Realign 0 0 (164) 0 (164) 0 0 (164) (175) (339) 

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton

Realign (145) 7 (6) (145) 1 0 0 (144) (129) (273) 

Naval Base Coronado Realign (71) 198 (587) (71) (389) 0 0 (460) (481) (941) Naval Medical Center San DiegoRealign (1,596) 0 (33) (1,596) (33) 0 (1) (1,630) (1,470) (3,100) Naval Weapons Station FallbrookRealign 0 0 (118) 0 (118) 0 0 (118) (126) (244) 

Total (1,874) 675 (1,491) (390) (816) 1,484 1 (1,205) (1,222) (2,427) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaOnizuka Air Force Station Close (107) 0 (171) (107) (171) 0 0 (278) (114) (392) AFRC Moffett Field Gain 0 166 0 87 166 87 0 253 106 359 

Total (107) 166 (171) (20) (5) 87 0 (25) (8) (33) 

San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo, PR Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Humacao

Close (26) 0 0 (26) 0 0 0 (26) (18) (44) 

Lavergne U.S. Army Reserve Center Bayamon

Close (25) 0 (1) (25) (1) 0 0 (26) (18) (44) 

Camp Euripides Rubio, Puerto Nuevo

Realign (43) 0 0 (43) 0 0 0 (43) (29) (72) 

Fort Buchanan Realign (9) 0 (47) (9) (47) 0 0 (56) (54) (110) 

Total (103) 0 (48) (103) (48) 0 0 (151) (119) (270) 

Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA Metropolitan DivisionNaval Weapons Station Seal Beach Det Concord

Close 0 0 (71) 0 (71) 0 0 (71) (57) (128) 

Los Alamitos (63rd) Realign (92) 0 (78) (92) (78) 0 0 (170) (99) (269) 

Total (92) 0 (149) (92) (149) 0 0 (241) (156) (397) 

Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaVandenburg Air Force Base Gain 0 101 0 44 101 44 0 145 114 259 

Total 0 101 0 44 101 44 0 145 114 259 

Savannah, GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaSavannah International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 21 0 17 21 17 0 38 38 76 

Total 0 21 0 17 21 17 0 38 38 76 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaSerrenti U.S. Army Reserve Center, Scranton

Close (47) 0 (8) (47) (8) 0 0 (55) (21) (76) 

Tobyhanna Army Depot Gain (1) 355 (82) 2 273 3 0 275 192 467 

Total (48) 355 (90) (45) 265 3 0 220 171 391 

Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Everett 

Close (57) 0 0 (57) 0 0 0 (57) (32) (89) 

U.S. Army Reserve Center Fort Lawton

Close (53) 0 (54) (53) (54) 0 0 (107) (76) (183) 

Total (110) 0 (54) (110) (54) 0 0 (164) (108) (272) 

Shreveport-Bossier City, LA Metropolitan Statistical AreaBarksdale Air Force Base Gain 0 60 0 5 60 5 0 65 70 135 

Total 0 60 0 5 60 5 0 65 70 135 

Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ Micropolitan Statistical AreaFort Huachuca Realign 0 44 (212) 0 (168) 0 1 (167) (125) (292) 

Total 0 44 (212) 0 (168) 0 1 (167) (125) (292) 

Sioux City, IA-NE-SD Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Sioux City Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) Sioux Gateway Airport Air GuardGain 0 170 0 33 170 33 0 203 155 358 

Total (7) 170 0 26 170 33 0 196 153 349 

Sioux Falls, SD Metropolitan Statistical AreaJoe Foss Field Air Guard StationGain (4) 27 0 28 27 32 0 55 35 90 

Total (4) 27 0 28 27 32 0 55 35 90 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Spokane, WA Metropolitan Statistical Area1LT Richard H. Walker U.S. Army Reserve Center

Close (38) 0 0 (38) 0 0 0 (38) (32) (70) 

Fairchild Air Force Base Realign (26) 0 (172) (26) (172) 0 0 (198) (215) (413) 

Total (64) 0 (172) (64) (172) 0 0 (236) (247) (483) 

Springfield, IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaCapital Airport Air Guard Station Realign (52) 0 (133) (30) (133) 22 0 (163) (105) (268) 

Total (52) 0 (133) (30) (133) 22 0 (163) (105) (268) 

Springfield, MA Metropolitan Statistical AreaWestover U.S. Army Reserve Center, Cicopee 

Close (13) 0 0 (13) 0 0 0 (13) (5) (18) 

Barnes Municipal Airport Air Guard Station 

Gain 0 89 (5) 23 84 23 0 107 86 193 

Westover Air Force Base Gain 0 11 0 69 11 69 0 80 41 121 

Total (13) 100 (5) 79 95 92 0 174 122 296 

Springfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaSpringfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air Guard Station

Realign (66) 0 (225) (66) (225) 0 0 (291) (149) (440) 

Total (66) 0 (225) (66) (225) 0 0 (291) (149) (440) 

St. Joseph, MO-KS Metropolitan Statistical AreaRosecrans Memorial Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 27 0 8 27 8 0 35 23 58 

Total 0 27 0 8 27 8 0 35 23 58 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Jefferson Barracks

Close (67) 0 0 (67) 0 0 0 (67) (54) (121) 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, St. Louis

Close (2) 0 (291) (2) (291) 0 0 (293) (318) (611) 

Leased Space - MO Close/Realign (709) 0 (1,234) (709) (1,234) 0 (150) (2,093) (2,078) (4,171) Scott Air Force Base Gain (252) 832 0 (121) 832 131 86 797 900 1,697 Lambert International Airport- St Louis

Realign (34) 0 (215) (34) (215) 0 0 (249) (261) (510) 

Total (1,064) 832 (1,740) (933) (908) 131 (64) (1,905) (1,811) (3,716) 

St. Marys, GA Micropolitan Statistical AreaSubmarine Base Kings Bay Gain 0 102 0 3,245 102 3,245 20 3,367 1,667 5,034 

Total 0 102 0 3,245 102 3,245 20 3,367 1,667 5,034 

Stewart County, GABethesda/Chevy Chase Realign (5) 0 (2) (5) (2) 0 0 (7) (4) (11) 

Total (5) 0 (2) (5) (2) 0 0 (7) (4) (11) 

Stockton, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Distribution Depot San Joaquin

Realign 0 0 (31) 0 (31) 0 0 (31) (20) (51) 

Total 0 0 (31) 0 (31) 0 0 (31) (20) (51) 

Sumter, SC Metropolitan Statistical AreaShaw Air Force Base Gain (74) 76 (1) 742 75 816 0 817 604 1,421 

Total (74) 76 (1) 742 75 816 0 817 604 1,421 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Tacoma, WA Metropolitan DivisionNavy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Tacoma

Close (20) 0 0 (20) 0 0 0 (20) (15) (35) 

Fort Lewis Gain (2) 46 (1) 185 45 187 0 230 187 417 McChord Air Force Base Realign (460) 7 (143) (424) (136) 36 (7) (567) (469) (1,036) 

Total (482) 53 (144) (259) (91) 223 (7) (357) (297) (654) 

Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center ST Petersburg

Close (12) 0 0 (12) 0 0 0 (12) (10) (22) 

MacDill Air Force Base Gain (292) 231 0 (130) 231 162 0 101 152 253 

Total (304) 231 0 (142) 231 162 0 89 142 231 

Terre Haute, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaNewport Chemical Depot Close (210) 0 (81) (210) (81) 0 (280) (571) (267) (838) Hulman Regional Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (12) 0 (124) (12) (124) 0 0 (136) (95) (231) 

Total (222) 0 (205) (222) (205) 0 (280) (707) (362) (1,069) 

Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaLone Star Army Ammunition PlantClose (2) 0 (18) (2) (18) 0 (129) (149) (80) (229) Red River Army Depot Close (9) 0 (2,491) (9) (2,491) 0 0 (2,500) (1,676) (4,176) 

Total (11) 0 (2,509) (11) (2,509) 0 (129) (2,649) (1,756) (4,405) 

Toledo, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaToledo Express Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 112 0 14 112 14 0 126 90 216 

Total 0 112 0 14 112 14 0 126 90 216 

Topeka, KS Metropolitan Statistical AreaForbes Field Air Guard Station Gain 0 194 0 53 194 53 0 247 169 416 

Total 0 194 0 53 194 53 0 247 169 416 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Trenton-Ewing, NJ Metropolitan Statistical AreaInspector/Instructor Center West Trenton

Close (11) 0 (1) (11) (1) 0 0 (12) (4) (16) 

Total (11) 0 (1) (11) (1) 0 0 (12) (4) (16) 

Troy, AL Micropolitan Statistical AreaAnderson U.S. Army Reserve Center Troy

Close (15) 0 0 (15) 0 0 0 (15) (8) (23) 

Total (15) 0 0 (15) 0 0 0 (15) (8) (23) 

Tucson, AZ Metropolitan Statistical AreaAllen Hall Armed Forces Reserve Center, Tucson

Close (60) 0 0 (60) 0 0 0 (60) (52) (112) 

Total (60) 0 0 (60) 0 0 0 (60) (52) (112) 

Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Broken Arrow

Close (26) 0 0 6 0 32 0 6 2 8 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Tulsa

Close (32) 0 0 (32) 0 0 0 (32) (11) (43) 

Tulsa International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 81 0 22 81 22 0 103 83 186 

Total (58) 81 0 (4) 81 54 0 77 74 151 

Tuscaloosa, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Tuscaloosa AL

Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Total (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 0 (7) (2) (9) 

Tuskegee, AL Micropolitan Statistical AreaAbbott U.S. Army Reserve Center Tuskegee

Close (2) 0 (1) (2) (1) 0 0 (3) (1) (4) 

Total (2) 0 (1) (2) (1) 0 0 (3) (1) (4) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Utica-Rome, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Rome

Close 0 0 (290) 0 (290) 0 0 (290) (274) (564) 

Rome Laboratory Realign (13) 0 (124) (13) (124) 0 0 (137) (122) (259) 

Total (13) 0 (414) (13) (414) 0 0 (427) (396) (823) 

Valdosta, GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaMoody Air Force Base Gain (604) 50 (145) 670 (95) 1,274 0 575 416 991 

Total (604) 50 (145) 670 (95) 1,274 0 575 416 991 

Vicksburg, MS Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Vicksburg 

Close (26) 0 (2) (26) (2) 0 0 (28) (15) (43) 

Total (26) 0 (2) (26) (2) 0 0 (28) (15) (43) 

Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Monroe Close (1,393) 0 (1,948) (1,393) (1,948) 0 (223) (3,564) (4,418) (7,982) Langley Air Force Base Gain (53) 68 (46) 727 22 780 0 749 796 1,545 Naval Amphibious Base Little Creek

Gain 0 27 0 10 27 10 0 37 48 85 

Naval Shipyard Norfolk Gain 0 1,774 0 177 1,774 177 85 2,036 2,744 4,780 Naval Station Norfolk Gain (373) 356 (1,085) 3,447 (729) 3,820 89 2,807 2,716 5,523 Naval Support Activity Norfolk Gain (6) 205 0 567 205 573 16 788 899 1,687 Fort Eustis Realign (3,863) 1,432 (852) (2,901) 580 962 169 (2,152) (2,066) (4,218) Naval Air Station Oceana Realign (110) 53 (3) (110) 50 0 0 (60) (46) (106) Naval Medical Center PortsmouthRealign (463) 0 (25) (435) (25) 28 (1) (461) (494) (955) Naval Weapons Station YorktownRealign 0 0 (179) 0 (179) 0 0 (179) (248) (427) 

Total (6,261) (4,138) 89 (223) 6,350 3,915 135 1 (69) (68) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Warner Robins, GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaRobins Air Force Base Gain (484) 224 (225) (31) (1) 453 781 749 445 1,194 

Total (484) 224 (225) (31) (1) 453 781 749 445 1,194 

Warren-Farmington Hills-Troy, MI Metropolitan DivisionSelfridge Army Activity Close (126) 0 (174) (126) (174) 0 0 (300) (180) (480) Selfridge Air National Guard BaseGain (3) 167 (76) 69 91 72 (76) 84 51 135 

Total (129) 167 (250) (57) (83) 72 (76) (216) (129) (345) 

Warrensburg, MO Micropolitan Statistical AreaWhiteman Air Force Base Gain 0 58 0 3 58 3 0 61 49 110 

Total 0 58 0 3 58 3 0 61 49 110 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan DivisionNavy Reserve Center Adelphi Close (17) 0 0 (17) 0 0 0 (17) (10) (27) Leased Space - DC Close/Realign (103) 79 (68) (103) 11 0 0 (92) (56) (148) Leased Space - VA Close/Realign (6,199) 0 (15,539) (6,199) (15,539) 0 (972) (22,710) (16,291) (39,001) Andrews Air Force Base Gain (416) 489 (189) 191 300 607 (91) 400 286 686 Fort Belvoir Gain (466) (2,281) 4,071 5,729 4,537 8,010 2,058 11,858 8,250 20,108 Headquarters Battalion, Headquarters Marine Corps, 

Gain (52) 206 (22) 401 184 453 81 666 443 1,109 

Marine Corps Base Quantico Gain (50) 1,357 0 446 1,357 496 1,210 3,013 2,108 5,121 Arlington Service Center Realign (224) 406 (516) 211 (110) 435 (383) (282) (205) (487) Bolling Air Force Base Realign (96) 0 (242) (96) (242) 0 (61) (399) (283) (682) Center for Naval Research Realign (25) 0 (313) (25) (313) 0 0 (338) (252) (590) Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Arlington

Realign (7) 0 (401) (7) (401) 0 0 (408) (308) (716) 

Naval Air Facility Washington Realign (9) 0 (9) (9) (9) 0 0 (18) (12) (30) Naval District Washington Realign (108) 522 (845) (80) (323) 28 40 (363) (268) (631) Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head

Realign 0 42 (137) 0 (95) 0 0 (95) (71) (166) 

Potomac Annex Realign (4) 0 (5) (4) (5) 0 (3) (12) (8) (20) U.S. Marine Corps Direct Reporting Program Manager 

Realign 0 0 (32) 0 (32) 0 0 (32) (24) (56) 

Walter Reed Army Medical CenterRealign (2,679) 31 (2,388) (2,651) (2,357) 28 (622) (5,630) (3,856) (9,486) 

Total (10,455) (22,987) (3,871) (11,845) 6,584 1,142 1,257 (14,459) (10,557) (25,016) 

Watertown-Fort Drum, NY Micropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center WatertownClose (9) 0 0 (9) 0 0 0 (9) (5) (14) 

Total (9) 0 0 (9) 0 0 0 (9) (5) (14) 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Wheeling, WV-OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Moundsville

Close (16) 0 0 (16) 0 0 0 (16) (5) (21) 

Total (16) 0 0 (16) 0 0 0 (16) (5) (21) 

Wichita Falls, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaSheppard Air Force Base Realign (2,519) 2 (158) (2,468) (156) 51 0 (2,624) (1,744) (4,368) 

Total (2,519) 2 (158) (2,468) (156) 51 0 (2,624) (1,744) (4,368) 

Wichita, KS Metropolitan Statistical AreaMcConnell Air Force Base Gain (27) 28 (183) 677 (155) 704 0 522 308 830 U.S. Army Reserve Center Wichita 

Realign (22) 0 (56) (22) (56) 0 0 (78) (76) (154) 

Total (49) 28 (239) 655 (211) 704 0 444 232 676 

Williamsport, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Williamsport

Close (25) 0 (4) (25) (4) 0 0 (29) (16) (45) 

Total (25) 0 (4) (25) (4) 0 0 (29) (16) (45) 

Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metropolitan DivisionKirkwood U.S. Army Reserve Center, Newark

Close (7) 0 (2) (7) (2) 0 0 (9) (4) (13) 

New Castle County Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (47) 0 (101) (47) (101) 0 0 (148) (101) (249) 

Total (54) 0 (103) (54) (103) 0 0 (157) (105) (262) 

Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaYoungstown-Warren Regional Airport

Gain 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 7 15 

Total 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 7 15 

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
Economic Area

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Net Mission 

Contractor

Total 

Direct

Indirect 

Changes

Total 

Job 

Changes

Yuba City, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaBeale Air Force Base Realign (8) 0 (171) (8) (171) 0 0 (179) (132) (311) 

Total (8) 0 (171) (8) (171) 0 0 (179) (132) (311) 

Yuma, AZ Metropolitan Statistical AreaMarine Corps Air Station Yuma Gain 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 4 9 

Total 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 5 4 9 

Grand Total* (118,880) (84,799) 3,389 (18,891) 122,269 2,818 65,908 (12,684)

*Does not include the reduction of 14,172 military positions and increase of 667 civilian positions from Germany, Korea, and Undistributed Actions.

This list does not include locations where no changes in military or civilian jobs are affected. Military figures include student load changes.
State Base Economic Region

Alabama Abbott U.S. Army Reserve Center Tuskegee Tuskegee, AL Micropolitan Statistical Area

Anderson U.S. Army Reserve Center Troy Troy, AL Micropolitan Statistical AreaAnniston Army Depot Anniston-Oxford, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center (New) Tuscaloosa, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Brimingham Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Mobile Mobile, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Pelham (New) Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Northport Tusaloosa Tuscaloosa, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaBG William P Screws U.S. Army Reserve Center Montgomery Montgomery, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaBirmingham Armed Forces Reserve Center Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaBirmingham International Airport Air Guard Station Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaDannelly Field Air Guard Station Montgomery, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFaith Wing U.S. Army Reserve Center Anniston Anniston-Oxford, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFinnel Armed Forces Reserve Center ,Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFlowers U.S. Army Reserve Center Decatur Decatur, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Ganey Army National Guard Reserve Center Mobile Mobile, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Graham Army National Guard Reserve Center Birmingham Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Hanna Army National Guard Reserve Center Birmingham Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Hardeman Army National Guard Reserve Center Mobile Mobile, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Powell-Shamblin Army National Guard Reserve Center Tusaloosa Tuscaloosa, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Rucker Enterprise-Ozark, AL Micropolitan Statistical AreaFort Terhune Army National Guard Reserve Center Birmingham Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaGary U.S. Army Reserve Center Enterprize Enterprise-Ozark, AL Micropolitan Statistical AreaJoint Forces Headquarters (Armed Forces Reserve Center) Montgomery Montgomery, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - AL Huntsville, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaMaxwell Air Force Base Montgomery, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Recruiting District Montgomery Montgomery, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Tuscaloosa AL Tuscaloosa, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center, Mobile AL Mobile, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaRedstone Arsenal Huntsville, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaSMD Annex Bldg Montgomery Montgomery, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaThe Adjutant General Bldg, AL Army National Guard Montgomery Montgomery, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaUSARC Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaWright U.S. Army Reserve Center Mobile, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area

Alaska Eielson Air Force Base Fairbanks, AK Metropolitan Statistical Area

Elmendorf Air Force Base Anchorage, AK Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Greely Fairbanks, AK Metropolitan Statistical Area

Appendix B Addendum

List of Bases in Economic Regions
State Base Economic Region

Fort Richardson Anchorage, AK Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Wainwright Fairbanks, AK Metropolitan Statistical AreaKulis Air Guard Station Anchorage, AK Metropolitan Statistical Area

Arizona Air Force Research Lab, Mesa City Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical A

Allen Hall Armed Forces Reserve Center, Tucson Tucson, AZ Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Roosevelt Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical ABuckeye Armed Forces Reserve Center Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical ADeer Valley U.S. Army Reserve #2, Phoenix Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical AFort Huachuca Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ Micropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - AZ Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical ALuke Air Force Base Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical AMarana Armed Forces Reserve Center Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical APhoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Metropolitan Statistical AU.S. Army Reserve Area Maintenance Support Facility Fort Huachuca Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ Micropolitan Statistical Area

Arkansas Armed Forces Reserve Center Arkadelphia Arkadelphia, AR Micropolitan Statistical Area

Armed Forces Reserve Center Fort Chaffee (new) Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Northwest Arkansas Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO Metropolitan SArmy National Guard Field Maintenance Shop, Jonesboro Jonesboro, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Arkadelphia Arkadelphia, AR Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Bentonville Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO Metropolitan SArmy National Guard Reserve Center Camden Camden, AR Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Combined Support Maintenance Shop Fort Chaffee Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center El Dorado El Dorado, AR Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Fayetteville Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO Metropolitan SArmy National Guard Reserve Center Fort Smith Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Hot Springs Hot Springs, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Jonesboro Jonesboro, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Paragould Paragould, AR Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Pine Bluff Pine Bluff, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Rogers Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO Metropolitan SArmy National Guard Reserve Center Springdale Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO Metropolitan SArmy National Guard Reserve Center Van Buren Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaBG Darby U.S. Army Reserve Center Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaCamp Pike (90th) Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR Metropolitan StatisticChaffee 475th Div U.S. Army Reserve Center Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaCharleston Armory Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaEl Dorado Armed Forces Reserve Center El Dorado, AR Micropolitan Statistical AreaFort Chaffee Maneuver Training Center ISU Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Smith Regional Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaJMF Fort Chaffee Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaJonesboro Armed Forces Reserve Center Jonesboro, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaLittle Rock Air Force Base Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR Metropolitan Statistic
State Base Economic Region

New Armed Forces Reserve Center Hot Springs Hot Springs, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaPine Bluff Armed Forces Reserve Center Pine Bluff, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaPine Bluff Arsenal Pine Bluff, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaStone U.S. Army Reserve Center, Pine Bluff Pine Bluff, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Area Maintenance Support Facility,Malvern Hot Spring County, ARU.S. Army Reserve Center Arkadelphia Arkadelphia, AR Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Camden Camden, AR Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center El Dorado El Dorado, AR Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Hot Springs Hot Springs, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Jonesboro Jonesboro, AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Pond Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO Metropolitan SU.S. Army Reserve ECS-15, Barling Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical Area

California Armed Forces Reserve Center Bell Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan D

Armed Forces Reserve Center Moffett San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metropolitan StatiArmy National Guard OMS, San Jose San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metropolitan StatiArmy National Guard Reserve Center Bell Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan DArmy National Guard Reserve Center Montebello Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan DArmy National Guard Reserve Center Redwood City San Francisco-San Mateo-Redwood City, CA MetropoliArmy National Guard Reserve Center San Lorenzo Oakland-Fremont-Hayward, CA Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Sunnyvale San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metropolitan StatiBeale Air Force Base Yuba City, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaBell Armed Forces Reserve Center Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan DCamp Parks (91st) Oakland-Fremont-Hayward, CA Metropolitan DivisionChannel Islands Air Guard Station Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Metropolitan StatiDefense Distribution Depot San Joaquin Stockton, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Oakland Oakland-Fremont-Hayward, CA Metropolitan DivisionDefense Finance and Accounting Service, San Bernardino Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metropolitan StaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, San Diego San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan StatiDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Seaside Salinas, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaDesiderio U.S. Army Reserve Center, Pasadena Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan DEdwards Air Force Base Bakersfield, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Hunter Liggett Salinas, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaFresno Air Terminal Fresno, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaHall U.S. Army Reserve Center Mountain View San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metropolitan StatiHazard Park U.S. Army Reserve Center, Los Angeles Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan DHuman Resources Support Center Southwest San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan StatiLeased Space - CA Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan DLos Alamitos (63rd) Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA Metropolitan DivisionMarch Air Reserve Base Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metropolitan StaMarine Corps Base Camp Pendleton San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan StatiMarine Corps Base Miramar San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan StatiMarine Corps Logistics Base Barstow Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metropolitan StaMarine Corps Reseve Center Pasadena CA Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan D
State Base Economic Region

Moffett Field San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metropolitan StatiNaval Air Station Lemore Hanford-Corcoran, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Air Weapons Station China Lake Bakersfield, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Base Coronado San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan StatiNaval Base Point Loma San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan StatiNaval Base Ventura City Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Metropolitan StatiNaval Medical Center San Diego San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan StatiNaval Station San Diego San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan StatiNaval Support Activity Corona Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metropolitan StaNaval Weapons Station Concord Oakland-Fremont-Hayward, CA Metropolitan DivisionNaval Weapons Station Fallbrook San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA Metropolitan StatiNaval Weapons Station Seal Beach Santa Ana-Anaheim-Irvine, CA Metropolitan DivisionNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center, Encino Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan DNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center, Los Angeles Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan DOnizuka Air Force Station San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metropolitan StatiRichey U.S. Army Reserve Center, San Jose San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metropolitan StatiRiverbank Army Ammunition Plant Modesto, CA Metropolitan Statistical AreaSchroeder Hall U.S. Army Reserve Center, Long Beach Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale, CA Metropolitan DSierra Army Depot Susanville, CA Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Moffett Field San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metropolitan StatiVandenberg Air Force Base Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA Metropolitan StaVandenburg Air Force Base Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA Metropolitan Sta

Colorado Air Reserve Personnel Center Denver-Aurora, CO Metropolitan Statistical Area

Buckley Air Force Base Denver-Aurora, CO Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Carson Colorado Springs, CO Metropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - CO Colorado Springs, CO Metropolitan Statistical AreaPeterson Air Force Base Colorado Springs, CO Metropolitan Statistical AreaSchriever Air Force Base Colorado Springs, CO Metropolitan Statistical AreaUnited States Air Force Academy Colorado Springs, CO Metropolitan Statistical Area

Connecticut Army National Guard Reserve Center Manchester Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Naugatuck New Haven-Milford, CT Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center New Britain Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan Army National Guard Reserve Center Newington Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan Army National Guard Reserve Center Norwalk Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Metropolitan StatistiArmy National Guard Reserve Center Putnam Willimantic, CT Micropolitan Statistical AreaBradley International Airport Air Guard Station Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan New Haven New Haven-Milford, CT Metropolitan Statistical AreaNew Middletown Armed Forces Reserve Center Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan New Newtown Armed Forces Reserve Center Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Metropolitan StatistiSGT George D. Libby U.S. Army Reserve Center, New Haven New Haven-Milford, CT Metropolitan Statistical AreaSubmarine Base New London Norwich-New London, CT Metropolitan Statistical AreaSutcovoy U.S. Army Reserve Center, Waterbury New Haven-Milford, CT Metropolitan Statistical AreaTurner U.S. Army Reserve Center, Fairfield Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Metropolitan Statisti
State Base Economic Region

U.S. Army Reserve Area Maintenance Support Facility #69, Milford Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Metropolitan StatistiU.S. Army Reserve Center Area Maintenance Support Facility Middletown Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan U.S. Army Reserve Center Area Maintenance Support Facility Windsor Lock Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan U.S. Army Reserve Center Danbury Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Metropolitan Statisti

Delaware Army National Guard Reserve Center Middletown Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metropolitan Division

Dover Air Force Base Dover, DE Metropolitan Statistical AreaKirkwood U.S. Army Reserve Center, Newark Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metropolitan DivisionNew Castle County Airport Air Guard Station Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metropolitan DivisionNewark Armed Forces Reserve Center (New) Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metropolitan DivisionU.S. Army Reserve Center / Organizational Maintence Site Newark Wilmington, DE-MD-NJ Metropolitan Division

District of Columbia Bolling Air Force Base Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV M

Leased Space - DC Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MNaval District Washington Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MPotomac Annex Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MWalter Reed Army Medical Center Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV M

Florida Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Orlando Orlando, FL Metropolitan Statistical Area

Eglin Air Force Base Fort Walton Beach-Crestview-Destin, FL Metropolitan SHomestead Air Reserve Station Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, FL Metropolitan DivisionHurlburt Field Fort Walton Beach-Crestview-Destin, FL Metropolitan SJacksonville International Airport Air Guard Station Jacksonville, FL Metropolitan Statistical AreaMacDill Air Force Base Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metropolitan StatiNaval Air Station Jacksonville Jacksonville, FL Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Air Station Pensacola Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL Metropolitan Statistical Naval Station Mayport Jacksonville, FL Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Support Activity Panama City Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL Metropolitan Statistical ANavy Reserve Center ST Petersburg Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metropolitan StatiPatrick Air Force Base Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL Metropolitan StatistTyndall Air Force Base Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL Metropolitan Statistical A

Georgia Dobbins Air Reserve Base Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Metropolitan Statis

Fort Benning Columbus, GA-AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Benning Bldg 15 Columbus, GA-AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Benning Bldg 4960 Columbus, GA-AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Gillem Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Metropolitan StatisFort McPherson Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Metropolitan StatisLeased Space - GA Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Metropolitan StatisMarine Corps Logistics Base Albany Albany, GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaMarine Corps Reseve Center Rome GA Rome, GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaMoody Air Force Base Valdosta, GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Air Station Atlanta Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Metropolitan StatisPeachtree Leases Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Metropolitan StatisRobins Air Force Base Warner Robins, GA Metropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Savannah International Airport Air Guard Station Savannah, GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaSubmarine Base Kings Bay St. Marys, GA Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Columbus Columbus, GA-AL Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Fort Benning Columbus, GA-AL Metropolitan Statistical Area

Guam Andersen Air Force Base Guam County, GU

Navy Region Guam Guam County, GU

Hawaii Armed Forces Reserve Center Keaukaha Hilo, HI Micropolitan Statistical Area

Army National Guard Reserve Center Honokaa Kapaa, HI Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Keaau Hilo, HI Micropolitan Statistical AreaHickam Air Force Base Honolulu, HI Metropolitan Statistical AreaKunieda U.S. Army Reserve Center, Hilo Hilo, HI Micropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Station Pearl Harbor Honolulu, HI Metropolitan Statistical Area

Idaho Boise Air Terminal Air Guard Station Boise City-Nampa, ID Metropolitan Statistical Area

Mountain Home Air Force Base Mountain Home, ID Micropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Pocatello Pocatello, ID Metropolitan Statistical Area

Illinois Armed Forces Reserve Center Waukegan Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metropolitan Div

Armed Forces Reserve Center Carbondale Carbondale, IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Lake County, IL Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metropolitan DivArmed Forces Reserve Center Mt Vernon New Mount Vernon, IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center B73 Mt Vernon Mount Vernon, IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center B75 Mt Vernon Mount Vernon, IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Cairo Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO-IL Micropolitan StatisticaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Carbondale Carbondale, IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Salem Centralia, IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Waukegan Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metropolitan DivCapital Airport Air Guard Station Springfield, IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Sheridan Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metropolitan DivGreater Peoria Regional Airport Peoria, IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Station Great Lakes Lake County-Kenosha County, IL-WI Metropolitan DivNavy Reserve Center Forest Park Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL Metropolitan DivisionRock Island Arsenal Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL Metropolitan StatScott Air Force Base St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Centralia Centralia, IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Fairfield Wayne County, ILU.S. Army Reserve Center Marion Marion-Herrin, IL Micropolitan Statistical Area

Indiana Armed Forces Reserve Center Greenwood/Frank Indianapolis, IN Metropolitan Statistical Area

Armed Forces Reserve Center Lafeyette Lafayette, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Remington Gary, IN Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Monticello White County, INArmy National Guard Reserve Center Attica Fountain County, INArmy National Guard Reserve Center Boswell Lafayette, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Darlington Florence, SC Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Delphi Lafayette, IN Metropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Camp Atterbury Bldg #4 Indianapolis, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaCamp Atterbury Bldg #500 Indianapolis, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaCrane Army Ammunition Plant Martin County, INDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Indianapolis Indianapolis, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Wayne International Airport Air Guard Station Fort Wayne, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaHulman Regional Airport Air Guard Station Terre Haute, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - IN Indianapolis, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Support Activity Crane Martin County, INNavy Marine Corps Reserve Center Grissom Air Reserve Base, Bunker Hill Peru, IN Micropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Recruiting District Indiana Indianapolis, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Evansville Evansville, IN-KY Metropolitan Statistical AreaNewport Chemical Depot Terre Haute, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Lafeyette Lafayette, IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Seston Indianapolis, IN Metropolitan Statistical Area

Iowa Armed Forces Reserve Center Camp Dodge Des Moines, IA Metropolitan Statistical Area

Armed Forces Reserve Center Cedar Rapids Cedar Rapids, IA Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Middletown Burlington, IA-IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center New Muscaline Muscatine, IA Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Camp Dodge Des Moines, IA Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Cedar Rapids Cedar Rapids, IA Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Muscaline Muscatine, IA Micropolitan Statistical AreaDes Moines International Airport Air Guard Station Des Moines, IA Metropolitan Statistical AreaIowa Army Ammunition Plant Burlington, IA-IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Cedar Rapids Cedar Rapids, IA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Sioux City Sioux City, IA-NE-SD Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Dubuque Dubuque, IA Metropolitan Statistical AreaSioux Gateway Airport Air Guard Sioux City, IA-NE-SD Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve /Area Maintenance Support Facility Middletown Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan U.S. Army Reserve Center Cedar Rapids Cedar Rapids, IA Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Muscaline Muscatine, IA Micropolitan Statistical Area

Kansas Forbes Field Air Guard Station Topeka, KS Metropolitan Statistical Area

Fort Leavenworth Kansas City, MO-KS Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Riley Manhattan, KS Micropolitan Statistical AreaKansas Army Ammunition Plant Parsons, KS Micropolitan Statistical AreaMcConnell Air Force Base Wichita, KS Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Wichita Wichita, KS Metropolitan Statistical Area

Kentucky Armed Forces Reserve Center Paducah Paducah, KY-IL Micropolitan Statistical Area

Army National Guard OMS, Paducah Paducah, KY-IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Paducah Paducah, KY-IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaBlue Grass Army Depot Richmond-Berea, KY Micropolitan Statistical AreaBlue Grass Army Depot USAR/Army National Guard Bldgs Richmond-Berea, KY Micropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Lexington Lexington-Fayette, KY Metropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Fort Campbell Clarksville, TN-KY Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Knox Elizabethtown, KY Metropolitan Statistical AreaLouisville International Airport Air Guard Station Louisville, KY-IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Recruiting Command Louisville Louisville, KY-IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Lexington Lexington-Fayette, KY Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve #2 , Paducah Paducah, KY-IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Louisville Louisville, KY-IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Maysville Maysville, KY Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Paducah Paducah, KY-IL Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Richmond Richmond-Berea, KY Micropolitan Statistical Area

Louisiana Armed Forces Reserve Center Shreveport Shreveport-Bossier City, LA Metropolitan Statistical Ar

Army National Guard Organizational Maintence Site #8, Baton Rouge Baton Rouge, LA Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Baton Rouge Baton Rouge, LA Metropolitan Statistical AreaBarksdale Air Force Base Shreveport-Bossier City, LA Metropolitan Statistical ArBaton Rouge Armed Forces Reserve Center Baton Rouge, LA Metropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - LA New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA Metropolitan StatistiNaval Air Station New Orleans New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA Metropolitan StatistiNaval Support Activity New Orleans New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA Metropolitan StatistiNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Baton Rouge Baton Rouge, LA Metropolitan Statistical AreaRoberts U.S. Army Reserve Center, Baton Rouge Baton Rouge, LA Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Bossier City Shreveport-Bossier City, LA Metropolitan Statistical ArU.S. Army Reserve Center Shreveport Shreveport-Bossier City, LA Metropolitan Statistical Ar

Maine Bangor International Airport Air Guard Station Bangor, ME Metropolitan Statistical Area

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Limestone Aroostook County, MENaval Air Station Brunswick Portland-South Portland-Biddeford ME Metropolitan StaNaval Reserve Center, Bangor Bangor, ME Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Shipyard Portsmouth Portland-South Portland-Biddeford ME Metropolitan StaSupervisor of Shipbuilding Bath Portland-South Portland-Biddeford ME Metropolitan Sta

Maryland Aberdeen Proving Ground Baltimore-Towson, MD Metropolitan Statistical Area

Andrews Air Force Base Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MArmy Research Laboratory, Adelphi Bethesda-Frederick-Gaithersburg, MD Metropolitan DivBethesda/Chevy Chase Bethesda-Frederick-Gaithersburg, MD Metropolitan DivDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Patuxent River Lexington Park, MD Micropolitan Statistical AreaFort Detrick Bethesda-Frederick-Gaithersburg, MD Metropolitan DivFort Lewis Lexington Park, MD Micropolitan Statistical AreaFort Meade Baltimore-Towson, MD Metropolitan Statistical AreaI-270 Corridor Bethesda-Frederick-Gaithersburg, MD Metropolitan DivLeased Space - MD Baltimore-Towson, MD Metropolitan Statistical AreaMartin State Airport Air Guard Station Baltimore-Towson, MD Metropolitan Statistical AreaNational Naval Medical Center Bethesda Bethesda-Frederick-Gaithersburg, MD Metropolitan DivNaval Air Facility Washington Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MNaval Air Station Patuxent River Lexington Park, MD Micropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Station Baltimore-Towson, MD Metropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MNaval Surface Weapons Station Carderock Bethesda-Frederick-Gaithersburg, MD Metropolitan DivNavy Reserve Center Adelphi Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MPFC Flair U.S. Army Reserve Center, Frederick Bethesda-Frederick-Gaithersburg, MD Metropolitan Div

Massachusetts Armed Forces Reserve Center Ayers Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan Div

Armed Forces Reserve Center New Westover Springfield, MA Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Combined Support Maintenance Shop Devens Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan DivArmy National Guard Reserve Center Ayer Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan DivArmy National Guard Reserve Center Agawam Worcester, MA Metropolitan Statistical AreaBarnes Municipal Airport Air Guard Station Springfield, MA Metropolitan Statistical AreaHanscom Air Force Base Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan DivMacArthur U.S. Army Reserve Center, Springfield Springfield, MA Metropolitan Statistical AreaMalony U.S. Army Reserve Center Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan DivNatick Soldier Systems Center Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan DivNaval Shipyard Puget Sound-Boston Detachment Boston-Quincy, MA Metropolitan DivisionOtis Air Guard Base Barnstable Town, MA Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Ayer Area 3713 Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan DivU.S. Army Reserve ECS 65 Ayers Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan DivU.S. Army Reserve Training Area Devens Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan DivUSAR 323 Maint Deven Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan DivUSAR 98 RTSM Devens Cambridge-Newton-Framingham, MA Metropolitan DivWestover Air Force Base Springfield, MA Metropolitan Statistical AreaWestover U.S. Army Reserve Center, Cicopee Springfield, MA Metropolitan Statistical Area

Michigan Armed Forces Reserve Center Fort Custer Kalamazoo-Portage, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area

Detroit Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan DivisionDetroit / Selfridge Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan DivisionDetroit / Selfridge Warren-Farmington Hills-Troy, MI Metropolitan DivisioDetroit Arsenal Detroit-Livonia-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan DivisionNavy Reserve Center Marquette Marquette, MI Micropolitan Statistical AreaParisan U.S. Army Reserve Center, Lansing Lansing-East Lansing, MI Metropolitan Statistical AreaSelfridge Air National Guard Base Warren-Farmington Hills-Troy, MI Metropolitan DivisioSelfridge Army Activity Warren-Farmington Hills-Troy, MI Metropolitan DivisioU.S. Army Reserve Center Area Maintenance Support Facility Battle Creek Battle Creek, MI Metropolitan Statistical AreaW. K. Kellogg Airport Air Guard Station Battle Creek, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area

Minnesota Armed Forces Reserve Center New Cambridge Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metropolita

Armed Forces Reserve Center New Faribault Faribault-Northfield, MN Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Cambridge Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI MetropolitaArmy National Guard Faribault Faribault-Northfield, MN Micropolitan Statistical AreaDuluth International Airport Air Guard Station Duluth, MN-WI Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Snelling Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI MetropolitaNavy Reserve Center Duluth Duluth, MN-WI Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Cambridge Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Metropolita
State Base Economic Region

U.S. Army Reserve Faribault Faribault-Northfield, MN Micropolitan Statistical Areax Local - Duluth, MN Duluth, MN-WI Metropolitan Statistical Area

Mississippi Columbus Air Force Base Columbus, MS Micropolitan Statistical Area

Construction Battalion Center Gulfport Gulfport-Biloxi, MS Metropolitan Statistical AreaHuman Resources Support Center Southeast Gulfport-Biloxi, MS Metropolitan Statistical AreaJackson International Airport Air Guard Station Jackson, MS Metropolitan Statistical AreaKeesler Air Force Base Gulfport-Biloxi, MS Metropolitan Statistical AreaKey Field Air Guard Station Meridian, MS Micropolitan Statistical AreaMississippi Army Ammunition Plant Picayune, MS Micropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Air Station Meridian Meridian, MS Micropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Station Pascagoula Pascagoula, MS Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Vicksburg Vicksburg, MS Micropolitan Statistical Area

Missouri Armed Forces Reserve Center Jefferson Barracks St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical Area

Army National Guard Reserve Center Jefferson Barracks St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy Reserve Personnel Center St Louis St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Kansas City Kansas City, MO-KS Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, St. Louis St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Leonard Wood Fort Leonard Wood, MO Micropolitan Statistical AreaLambert International Airport- St Louis St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaMarine Corps Reserve Support Center Kansas City Kansas City, MO-KS Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Recruiting District Kansas Kansas City, MO-KS Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Cape Girardeau Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO-IL Micropolitan StatisticaRosecrans Memorial Airport Air Guard Station St. Joseph, MO-KS Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Greentop Kirksville, MO Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center New Kirksville Kirksville, MO Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Jefferson Barracks St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical AreaWhiteman Air Force Base Warrensburg, MO Micropolitan Statistical Area

Montana Armed Forces Reserve Center Malmstrom Air Force Base Great Falls, MT Metropolitan Statistical Area

Army National Guard Reserve Center Missoula Great Falls, MT Metropolitan Statistical AreaGalt Hall U.S. Army Reserve Center, Great Falls Great Falls, MT Metropolitan Statistical AreaGreat Falls International Airport Air Guard Station Great Falls, MT Metropolitan Statistical AreaMalmstrom Air Force Base Great Falls, MT Metropolitan Statistical AreaNew Armed Forces Reserve Center Missoula Missoula, MT Metropolitan Statistical AreaVueve Hall & Area Maintenance Support Facility 75, Missoula Missoula, MT Metropolitan Statistical Area

Nebraska Armed Forces Reserve Center Beatrice (New) Beatrice, NE Micropolitan Statistical Area

Armed Forces Reserve Center Columbus (New) Columbus, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center McCook (New) Red Willow County, NEArmy National Guard Reserve Center Beatrice Beatrice, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Columbus Columbus, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Crete Saline County, NEArmy National Guard Reserve Center Fairbury Jefferson County, NEArmy National Guard Reserve Center Falls City Richardson County, NEArmy National Guard Reserve Center Grand Island Grand Island, NE Micropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Army National Guard Reserve Center Hastings Hastings, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Kearny Kearney, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center McCook Red Willow County, NEGreenlief TS Hasting Hastings, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaKearney Army National Guard Kearney, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Recruiting District Omaha Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA Metropolitan Statistical ANavy Reserve Center Lincoln Lincoln, NE Metropolitan Statistical AreaOffutt Air Force Base Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA Metropolitan Statistical AU.S. Army Reserve Center Hastings Hastings, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center McCook Red Willow County, NEU.S. Army Reserve Center Wymore Beatrice, NE Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Columbus Columbus, NE Micropolitan Statistical Area

Nevada Hawthorne Army Depot Reno-Sparks, NV Metropolitan Statistical Area

Naval Air Station Fallon Fallon, NV Micropolitan Statistical AreaNellis Air Force Base Las Vegas-Paradise, NV Metropolitan Statistical AreaReno-Tahoe International Airport Air Guard Station Reno-Sparks, NV Metropolitan Statistical Area

New Hampshire Armed Forces Reserve Center Pease Air Force Base Rockingham County-Strafford County, NH Metropolitan 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Dover Rockingham County-Strafford County, NH Metropolitan Army National Guard Reserve Center Portsmouth Rockingham County-Strafford County, NH Metropolitan Army National Guard Reserve Center Rochester Rockingham County-Strafford County, NH Metropolitan Army National Guard Reserve Center Somersworth Rockingham County-Strafford County, NH Metropolitan Doble U.S. Army Reserve Center Portsmouth Rockingham County-Strafford County, NH Metropolitan Pease International Rockingham County-Strafford County, NH Metropolitan 

New Jersey Armed Forces Reserve Center Camden (New) Camden, NJ Metropolitan Division

Army National Guard Reserve Center Burlington Camden, NJ Metropolitan DivisionAtlantic City International Airport Air Guard Station Atlantic City, NJ Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Dix Camden, NJ Metropolitan DivisionFort Monmouth Edison, NJ Metropolitan DivisionKilmer U.S. Army Reserve Center, Edison Edison, NJ Metropolitan DivisionMarine Corps Reseve Center West Trenton Trenton-Ewing, NJ Metropolitan Statistical AreaMcGuire Air Force Base Camden, NJ Metropolitan DivisionNaval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst Edison, NJ Metropolitan DivisionNaval Aviation Engineering Station Lakehurst Edison, NJ Metropolitan DivisionNaval Weapons Station Earle Edison, NJ Metropolitan DivisionPicatinny Arsenal Newark-Union, NJ-PA Metropolitan DivisionSFC Nelson B. Brittin U.S. Army Reserve Center Camden, NJ Metropolitan Divisionx Local - Trenton Trenton-Ewing, NJ Metropolitan Statistical Area

New Mexico Armed Forces Reserve Center Kirtland Air Force Base Albuquerque, NM Metropolitan Statistical Area

Cannon Air Force Base Clovis, NM Micropolitan Statistical AreaHolloman Air Force Base Alamogordo, NM Micropolitan Statistical AreaJenkins Armed Forces Reserve Center Albuquerque Albuquerque, NM Metropolitan Statistical AreaKirtland Air Force Base Albuquerque, NM Metropolitan Statistical AreaWhite Sands Missile Range Las Cruces, NM Metropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

New York Armed Forces Reserve Center Amityville Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan Division

Armed Forces Reserve Center Stewart (New) Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY Metropolitan Army National Guard NC Riverhead Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Organizational Maintence Site 21 Bayshore Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Niagara Falls Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center (Bedford) Brooklyn New York-Wayne-White Plains, NY-NJ Metropolitan DArmy National Guard Reserve Center Freeport Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Huntington Station Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Newburgh Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY Metropolitan Army National Guard Reserve Center Patchogue Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan DivisionCarpenter U.S. Army Reserve Center,Poughkeepie Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY Metropolitan Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Rome Utica-Rome, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Hamilton New York-Wayne-White Plains, NY-NJ Metropolitan DFort Tilden U.S. Army Reserve Center Far Rockaway New York-Wayne-White Plains, NY-NJ Metropolitan DFort Totten / Pyle New York-Wayne-White Plains, NY-NJ Metropolitan DMarcy Army National Guard Reserve Center Brooklyn New York-Wayne-White Plains, NY-NJ Metropolitan DMcDonald U.S. Army Reserve Center, Jamaica New York-Wayne-White Plains, NY-NJ Metropolitan DMuller U.S. Army Reserve Center Bronx New York-Wayne-White Plains, NY-NJ Metropolitan DNavy Recruiting District Buffalo Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Glenn Falls Glens Falls, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Horsehead Elmira, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Watertown Watertown-Fort Drum, NY Micropolitan Statistical AreaNew Joint Armed Forces Reserve Center Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan DivisionNiagara Falls International Airport Air Guard Station Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaRome Laboratory Utica-Rome, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaRoosevelt U.S. Army Reserve Center Uniondale Nassau-Suffolk, NY Metropolitan DivisionSchenectady County Air Guard Station Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY Metropolitan Statistical U.S. Army Reserve Center Area Maintenance Support Facility Niagara Falls Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Stewart-Newburgh Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY Metropolitan United States Military Academy Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY Metropolitan Watervliet Arsenal Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY Metropolitan Statistical 

North Carolina Armed Forces Reserve Center Wilmington -New Wilmington, NC Metropolitan Statistical Area

Army Research Office, Durham Durham, NC Metropolitan Statistical AreaCharlotte/Douglas Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC Metropolitan StatisFort Bragg Fayetteville, NC Metropolitan Statistical AreaMarine Corps Air Station Cherry Point New Bern, NC Micropolitan Statistical AreaMarine Corps Base Camp Lejeune Jacksonville, NC Metropolitan Statistical AreaMCAS Cherry Point New Bern, NC Micropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Asheville Asheville, NC Metropolitan Statistical AreaNiven U.S. Army Reserve Center, Albermarle Albemarle, NC Micropolitan Statistical AreaPope Air Force Base Fayetteville, NC Metropolitan Statistical AreaRhodes Armed Forces Reserve Center, Wilmington Wilmington, NC Metropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Seymore Johnson Air Force Base Goldsboro, NC Metropolitan Statistical Area

North Dakota Fargo, ND Armed Forces Reserve Center Fargo, ND-MN Metropolitan Statistical Area

Grand Forks Air Force Base Grand Forks, ND-MN Metropolitan Statistical AreaHector International Airport Air Guard Station Fargo, ND-MN Metropolitan Statistical AreaJohnson U.S. Army Reserve Center, Fargo Fargo, ND-MN Metropolitan Statistical Area

Ohio AFRC Mansfield ANG B Mansfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical Area

Air National Guard Springfield Armed Forces Reserve Center Springfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Akron Akron, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Oxford Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN Metropolitan StatistArmy National Guard Reserve Center Springfield Springfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Ashland Ashland, OH Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Mansfield Mansfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Newark Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Westerville Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Cleveland Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH Metropolitan Statistical ADefense Finance and Accounting Service, Dayton Dayton, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Supply Center Columbus Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaDSCC Armed Forces Reserve Center Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Hayes U.S. Army Reserve Center Columbus Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Lewis Lima, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaGlenn Research Center Dayton, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaHowey Army National Guard Columbus Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - OH Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaMansfield Lahm MAP Air Guard Station Mansfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Akron Akron, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Cleveland Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH Metropolitan Statistical AParrott U.S. Army Reserve Center Kenton Hardin County, OHRickenbacker Army National Guard Bldg 943 Columbus Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaRickenbacker International Airport Air Guard Station Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaScouten U.S. Army Reserve Center Mansfield Mansfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaSpringfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air Guard Station Springfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaSullivant Army National Guard Columbus Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaToledo Express Airport Air Guard Station Toledo, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Springfield Springfield, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Whitehall Columbus, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaWright Patterson Air Force Base Dayton, OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaYoungstown-Warren Regional Airport Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA Metropolitan S

Oklahoma

23rd Street Army National Guard Organizational Maintenance Site Oklahoma City Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical Area

23rd Street Army National Guard Reserve Center Oklahoma City Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical Area44th St Army National Guard Reserve Center Oklahoma City Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaAltus Air Force Base Altus, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Broken Arrow Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Armed Forces Reserve Center Muskogee Muskogee, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Vance Air Force Base Enid, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center West Oklahoma City Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Field Maintenance Shop #5 Durant Durant, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Field Maintenance Shop 14 Okmulgee Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Field Maintenance Shop Edmond Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Field Maintenance Shop Enid Enid, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Cherokee Alfalfa County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center / Combined Support Maintenance Shop Norman Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Allen Hughes County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Alva Woods County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Anadarko Caddo County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Atoka Atoka County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Blackwell Ponca City, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Broken Arrow RC Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Chickasha Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Cushing Stillwater, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Edmond Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center El Reno Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Enid Enid, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Eufaula McIntosh County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Frederick Tillman County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Hartshorne McAlester, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Haskell Muskogee, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Healdton Ardmore, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Henryetta Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Konowa Seminole County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Lawton Lawton, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Madilla Marshall County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Marlow Duncan, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center McAlester McAlester, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Midwest City Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Minco Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Muskogee Muskogee, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Norman Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Okemah Okfuskee County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Okmulgee Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Pawnee Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Pryor Mayes County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Stilwell Adair County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Tishomingo Johnston County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Tonkawa Ponca City, OK Micropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Army National Guard Reserve Center Wagoner Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Walters Cotton County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Watonga Blaine County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Wewoka Seminole County, OKArmy National Guard Reserve Center Woodward Woodward, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve CenterTahlequah Tahlequah, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaAshworth U.S. Army Reserve Center Muskogee Muskogee, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaBurris U.S. Army Reserve Center Chikasha Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaDuncan Army National Guard Duncan, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaFarr U.S. Army Reserve Center, Antlers Pushmataha County, OKFloyd Parker U.S. Army Reserve Center, McAlester McAlester, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaFort Sill Lawton, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaKeathley U.S. Army Reserve Center Lawton Lawton, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaKrowse U.S. Army Reserve Center Oklahoma City Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaMcAlester Army Ammunition Plant McAlester, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Tulsa Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaNorman Military Complex Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaOklahoma City (95th) Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaPerez U.S. Army Reserve Center Oklahoma City Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaRobbins U.S. Army Reserve Center, Enid Enid, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaRoush U.S. Army Reserve Center, Clinton Bartlesville, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaSmalley U.S. Army Reserve Center, Norman Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaTinker Air Force Base Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaTulsa International Airport Air Guard Station Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Broken Arrow Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical AreaVance Air Force Base Enid, OK Micropolitan Statistical AreaWill Rogers World Airport Air Guard Station Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical Area

Oregon Armed Forces Reserve Center Camp With (New) Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Metropolitan S

Army National Guard Reserve Center Camp Withycombe Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Metropolitan SArmy National Guard Reserve Center Jackson Band Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Metropolitan SArmy National Guard Reserve Center Lake Oswego Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Metropolitan SArmy National Guard Reserve Center Maison Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Metropolitan SNavy Reserve Center Central Point Medford, OR Metropolitan Statistical AreaPortland International Airport Air Guard Station Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Metropolitan SSears U.S. Army Reserve Center, Portland Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Metropolitan SSharff U.S. Army Reserve Center, Portland Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Metropolitan SUmatilla Army Depot Pendleton-Hermiston, OR Micropolitan Statistical Area

Pennsylvania Armed Forces Reserve Center Chester-Ger Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan Division

Armed Forces Reserve Center Lewisburg Lewisburg, PA Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Scranton Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreArmed Forces Reserve Center Williamsport Williamsport, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Berwick Bloomsburg-Berwick, PA Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Lewisburg Lewisburg, PA Micropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Army National Guard Reserve Center Sunbury Sunbury, PA Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Williamsport Williamsport, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaBristol (New) Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionBristol U.S. Army Reserve Center, Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionBristol-Woodhaven OMS, Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionDefense Distribution Depot Susquehanna Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaEngineering Field Activity Northeast Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionGermantown U.S. Army Reserve Center Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionHuman Resources Support Center Northeast Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionKelly Support Center Pittsburgh, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - PA (is this leased)? Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionLetterkenny Army Depot Chambersburg, PA Micropolitan Statistical AreaMarine Corps Reseve Center Johnstown Johnstown, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaMusselman U.S. Army Reserve Center, Norristown Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionNaval Air Station Willow Grove Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionNaval Support Activity Mechanicsburg Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Support Activity Philadelphia Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionNavy Crane Center Lester Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Lehigh Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ Metropolitan StatiNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Reading Reading, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNew Joint AFRC Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionNorth Penn U.S. Army Reserve Center, Norristown Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionPitt U.S. Army Reserve Center, Corapolis Pittsburgh, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaPittsburgh International Airport ARS Pittsburgh, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaSerrenti U.S. Army Reserve Center, Scranton Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreTobyhanna Army Depot Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreU.S. Army Reserve /Organizational Maintence Site Wilkes-Barre, Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreU.S. Army Reserve Center Bloomsburg Bloomsburg-Berwick, PA Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Horsham Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionU.S. Army Reserve Center Lewisburg Lewisburg, PA Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Organizational Maintence Site Scranton Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreU.S. Army Reserve Williamsport Williamsport, PA Metropolitan Statistical AreaW. Reese U.S. Army Reserve Center/OMS, Chester Philadelphia, PA Metropolitan DivisionWilson-Kramer U.S. Army Reserve Center, Bethlehem Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ Metropolitan Stati

Puerto Rico Armed Forces Reserve Center Ceiba (New) Fajardo, PR Metropolitan Statistical Area

Armed Forces Reserve Center Mayaguez (New) Mayagnez, PR Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Ceiba Fajardo, PR Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Humacao San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo, PR Metropolitan Statistical Army National Guard Reserve Center Juncos San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo, PR Metropolitan Statistical Army National Guard Reserve Center Mayaguez Mayagnez, PR Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Allen (New) Ponce, PR Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Allen, Juana Diaz Ponce, PR Metropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Fort Buchanan San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo, PR Metropolitan Statistical Lavergne U.S. Army Reserve Center Bayamon San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo, PR Metropolitan Statistical Rubio / Pt Nuevo San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo, PR Metropolitan Statistical San Juan Center Ponce, PR Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Ramey Aguadilla-Isabela-San Sebastian, PR Metropolitan StatisU.S. Army Reserve Center Rubio San Juan-Caguas-Guaynabo, PR Metropolitan Statistical 

Rhode Island Armed Forces Reserve Center NS Newport Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA Metropolit

Bristol U.S. Army Reserve Center Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA MetropolitHarwood U.S. Army Reserve Center, Providence Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA MetropolitNaval Station Newport Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA MetropolitQuonset State Airport AG Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA MetropolitQuonset State Airport Air Guard Station Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA MetropolitU.S. Army Reserve Center / Organizational Maintence Site Warwick Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA Metropolit

South Carolina Charleston Air Force Base Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metropolitan Statistica

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Charleston Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metropolitan StatisticaFort Jackson Columbia, SC Metropolitan Statistical AreaMcEntire Air Guard Station Columbia, SC Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Weapons Station Charleston Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metropolitan StatisticaRock Hill U.S. Army Reserve Center Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC Metropolitan StatisShaw Air Force Base Sumter, SC Metropolitan Statistical AreaSouth Naval Facilities Engineering Command Charleston-North Charleston, SC Metropolitan Statistica

South Dakota Ellsworth Air Force Base Rapid City, SD Metropolitan Statistical Area

Joe Foss Field Air Guard Station Sioux Falls, SD Metropolitan Statistical Area

Tennessee Armed Forces Reserve Center Kingsport Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA Metropolitan Statistic

Armed Forces Reserve Center New Kingsport A Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA Metropolitan StatisticArmed Forces Reserve Center Volunteer Army Ammunition Plant Chattanooga Chattanooga, TN-GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Clarksville Clarksville, TN-KY Metropolitan Statistical AreaBonney Oaks U.S. Army Reserve Center,Chattanooga Chattanooga, TN-GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaGuery U.S. Army Reserve Center, Chattanooga Chattanooga, TN-GA Metropolitan Statistical AreaMcGee Tyson Airport Air Guard Station Knoxville, TN Metropolitan Statistical AreaMcGee Tyson APT Air Guard Station Knoxville, TN Metropolitan Statistical AreaMemphis International Airport Air Guard Station Memphis, TN-MS-AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaMilan Army Ammunition Plant Humboldt, TN Micropolitan Statistical AreaNashville International Airport Air Guard Station Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro, TN Metropolitan StNaval Support Activity Mid South Memphis, TN-MS-AR Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Area Maintenance Support Facility Kingsport Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA Metropolitan StatisticU.S. Army Reserve Lease Clarksville, TN-KY Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Organizational Maintence Site Kingsport Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA Metropolitan Statistic

Texas 51st Street Army National Guard Field Maintenance Shop, Austin Austin-Round Rock, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area

Amarillo Army National Guard Amarillo, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Amarillo Amarillo, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Brownsville Brownsville-Harlingen, TX Metropolitan Statistical Are
State Base Economic Region

Armed Forces Reserve Center East Houston Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan StatistiArmed Forces Reserve Center Grand Prairie Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmed Forces Reserve Center Huntsville (New) Huntsville, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Lewisville Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmed Forces Reserve Center Lufkin Lufkin, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center San Marcos Austin-Round Rock, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Center Seagoville Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmed Forces Reserve Center Tyler Tyler, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmed Forces Reserve Round Rock( New) Austin-Round Rock, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Field Maintenance Shop Ellington Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan StatistiArmy National Guard Field Maintenance Shop Marshall Marshall, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Field Maintenance Shop Port Neches Palestine, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Field Maintenance Shop, Abilene Abilene, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Organizational Maintence Site Terrell Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center # 2 Dallas Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center # 4 Austin Austin-Round Rock, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center (Hondo Pass) El Paso El Paso, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Abilene Abilene, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Alice Alice, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Arlington Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Athens Athens, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Atlanta Cass County, TXArmy National Guard Reserve Center Baytown Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan StatistiArmy National Guard Reserve Center Beaumont Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Brownsville Brownsville-Harlingen, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreArmy National Guard Reserve Center California Crossing Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Coleman Coleman County, TXArmy National Guard Reserve Center Corsicana Corsicana, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Denison Sherman-Denison, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Denton Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Ellington Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan StatistiArmy National Guard Reserve Center Henderson Longview, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Hondo San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Huntsville Huntsville, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Irving Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Kaufman Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Kilgore Longview, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Kingsville Kingsville, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Lufkin Lufkin, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Marshall Marshall, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Nacogdoches Nacogdoches, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center New Braunfels San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Orange Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Army National Guard Reserve Center Pampa Pampa, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Pasadena Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan StatistiArmy National Guard Reserve Center Port Arthur Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Port Neches Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center San Marcos Austin-Round Rock, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Seguin San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Snyder Snyder, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Taylor Austin-Round Rock, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Terrell Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Texarkana Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR Metropolitan Statistical AArmy National Guard Reserve Center Tyler Tyler, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaBrooks City-Base San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaCarswell ARS, Naval Air Station Fo Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan DivisionCorpus Christi Army Depot Corpus Christi, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaDefense Finance and Accounting Service, San Antonio San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaDyess Air Force Base Abilene, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaEllington Field AGS Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan StatistiFort Bliss El Paso, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Hood Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX Metropolitan Statistical Fort Sam Houston San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaGrimes U.S. Army Reserve Center, Abilene Grimes County, TXGuillot U.S. Army Reserve Center, Texarkana Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR Metropolitan Statistical AHale Army National Guard Reserve Center, Plainview Plainview, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaHanby-Hayden U.S. Army Reserve Center, Mesquite Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionHerzog U.S. Army Reserve, Dallas Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionHouston # 2 USARC Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan StatistiHouston # 3 USARC Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan StatistiLackland Air Force Base San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaLaughlin Air Force Base Del Rio, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - TX San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaLone Star Army Ammunition Plant Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR Metropolitan Statistical AMiller U.S. Army Reserve Center, Huntsville Huntsville, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaMuchert U.S. Army Reserve Center Dallas Dallas-Plano-Irving, TX Metropolitan DivisionNaval Air Station Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Ft. Worth Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan DivisionNaval Air Station Kingsville Kingsville, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaNaval Station Ingleside Corpus Christi, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Lubbock, TX Lubbock, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy Reserve Center Orange,TX Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaNW Houston Armed Forces Reserve Center Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan StatistiRandolph Air Force Base San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaRathjen U.S. Army Reserve Center, Brownsville Brownsville-Harlingen, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreRed River Army Depot Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR Metropolitan Statistical A
State Base Economic Region

Sheppard Air Force Base Wichita Falls, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaTharp U.S. Army Reserve Center Amarillo, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Alice Alice, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Benavidez Duval County, TXU.S. Army Reserve Center Boswell San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Callaghan San Antonio, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Lufkin Lufkin, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Marshall Marshall, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Naval Air Station Kingsville Kingsville, TX Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Pasadena Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX Metropolitan StatistiU.S. Army Reserve Center Round Rock Austin-Round Rock, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center San Marcos Austin-Round Rock, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Segura El Paso, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Tyler Tyler, TX Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Wichita Falls Wichita Falls, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area

Utah Deseret Chemical Depot Salt Lake City, UT Metropolitan Statistical Area

Fort Douglas Salt Lake City, UT Metropolitan Statistical AreaHill Air Force Base Ogden-Clearfield, UT Metropolitan Statistical AreaTooele Army Depot Salt Lake City, UT Metropolitan Statistical Area

Vermont Armed Forces Reserve Center New Rutland Rutland, VT Micropolitan Statistical Area

Armed Forces Reserve Center White River Jct Lebanon, NH-VT Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Ludlow Lebanon, NH-VT Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center North Springfield Lebanon, NH-VT Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Rutland Rutland, VT Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Windsor Lebanon, NH-VT Micropolitan Statistical AreaBurlington International Airport Air Guard Station Burlington-South Burlington, VT Metropolitan StatisticaCourcelle Brothers U.S. Army Reserve Center, Rutland Rutland, VT Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Area Maintenance Support Facility #160, Rutland Rutland, VT Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Berlin Barre, VT Micropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Center Chester Lebanon, NH-VT Micropolitan Statistical Area

Virginia Center for Naval Research Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV M

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Arlington Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MDefense Supply Center Richmond Richmond, VA Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Belvoir Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MFort Eustis Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MetropFort Lee Richmond, VA Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Monroe Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MetropFort Myer Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MHeadquarters Battalion, Headquarters Marine Corps, Henderson Hall Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MLangley Air Force Base Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MetropLangley Research Center Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MetropLeased Space - VA Richmond, VA Metropolitan Statistical AreaLeased Space - VA Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC Metrop
State Base Economic Region

Leased Space - VA Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MMarine Corps Base Quantico Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV MNacval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren King George County, VANaval Air Station Oceana Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MetropNaval Amphibious Base Little Creek Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MetropNaval Medical Center Portsmouth Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MetropNaval Shipyard Norfolk Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MetropNaval Station Norfolk Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MetropNaval Support Activity Norfolk Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MetropNaval Weapons Station Yorktown Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC MetropRichmond International Airport Air Guard Station Richmond, VA Metropolitan Statistical AreaWoodbridge Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV M

Washington Armed Forces Reserve Center Fairchild Spokane, WA Metropolitan Statistical Area

Armed Forces Reserve Center Smokey Point Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard RC Geiger Field Spokane, WA Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Ellensburg Ellensburg, WA Micropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Everett Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metropolitan DivisionArmy National Guard Reserve Center Snohomish Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metropolitan DivisionFairchild Air Force Base Spokane, WA Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort Lawton Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metropolitan DivisionFort Lewis Tacoma, WA Metropolitan DivisionH. Walker USAR Cente Spokane, WA Metropolitan Statistical AreaHuman Resources Support Center Northwest Bremerton-Silverdale, WA Metropolitan Statistical AreaMann Hall U.S. Army Reserve Center Spokane Spokane, WA Metropolitan Statistical AreaMcChord Air Force Base Tacoma, WA Metropolitan DivisionNaval Station Bremerton Bremerton-Silverdale, WA Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Tacoma Tacoma, WA Metropolitan DivisionNEW VANCOUVER Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Metropolitan SOswald U.S. Army Reserve Center Everett Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA Metropolitan DivisionPendleton U.S. Army Reserve Center Yakima Training Center Yakima, WA Metropolitan Statistical AreaSubmarine Base Bangor Bremerton-Silverdale, WA Metropolitan Statistical AreaU.S. Army Reserve Area Maintenance Support Facility #80, Spokane Spokane, WA Metropolitan Statistical AreaVancover Barracks Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA Metropolitan SWagenaar U.S. Army Reserve Center Pasco Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA Metropolitan StatisticaYakima Armed Forces Reserve Center Yakima, WA Metropolitan Statistical Area

West Virginia Armed Forces Reserve Center Elkins (New) Randolph County, WV

Armed Forces Reserve Center Ripley (new) Jackson County, WVArmy National Guard Reserve Center Elkins Randolph County, WVArmy National Guard Reserve Center Spencer Roane County, WVArmy National Guard Reserve Center Fairmont Fairmont, WV Micropolitan Statistical AreaBias U.S. Army Reserve Center, Huntington Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH Metropolitan StatistiColburn U.S. Army Reserve Center /Organizational Maintence Site Fairmont Fairmont, WV Micropolitan Statistical Area
State Base Economic Region

Elkins U.S. Army Reserve/Organizational Maintence Site Beverly Fairmont, WV Micropolitan Statistical AreaEwvra Sheppard AGS Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV Metropolitan StatistiFairmont Armed Forces Reserve Center (New) Fairmont, WV Micropolitan Statistical AreaKuhl U.S. Army Reserve Center/Organizational Maintence Site Ripley Jackson County, WVNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Moundsville Wheeling, WV-OH Metropolitan Statistical AreaYeager APT AGS Charleston, WV Metropolitan Statistical Area

Wisconsin Armed Forces Reserve Center Madison Madison, WI Metropolitan Statistical Area

Dade County Airport Madison, WI Metropolitan Statistical AreaDane County Regional Madison, WI Metropolitan Statistical AreaFort McCoy Monroe County, WIGen Mitchell International Airport ARS Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI Metropolitan StatMCCOY Monroe County, WINavy Reserve Center La Crosse La Crosse, WI-MN Metropolitan Statistical AreaNavy-Marine Corps Reseve Center Madison Madison, WI Metropolitan Statistical AreaO'Connell U.S. Army Reserve Center, Madison Madison, WI Metropolitan Statistical AreaOlson USARC Madison, WI Metropolitan Statistical Area

Wyoming AASF/JFH/FMS WAFB Cheyenne, WY Metropolitan Statistical Area

Army Aviation Support Facility Cheyenne Cheyenne, WY Metropolitan Statistical AreaArmy National Guard Reserve Center Thermopolis Hot Springs County, WYCheyenne Airport Air Guard Station Cheyenne, WY Metropolitan Statistical AreaFrancis E. Warren Air Force Base Cheyenne, WY Metropolitan Statistical AreaJoint Forces Headquarters Complex , Cheyenne Cheyenne, WY Metropolitan Statistical Area
BRAC 2005 Closure and Realignment Impacts by Sta

State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

AlabamaAbbott U.S. Army Reserve Center Tuskegee

Close (2) 0 (1) (2) (1) 0 

Anderson U.S. Army Reserve Center Troy

Close (15) 0 0 (15) 0 0 

Armed Forces Reserve Center Mobile Close (27) 0 0 (5) 0 22 BG William P. Screws U.S. Army Reserve Center Montgomery

Close (15) 0 (3) (15) (3) 0 

Fort Ganey Army National Guard Reserve Center Mobile

Close (13) 0 0 (13) 0 0 

Fort Hanna Army National Guard Reserve Center Birmingham

Close (28) 0 0 (28) 0 0 

Gary U.S. Army Reserve Center Enterprize

Close (9) 0 (1) (9) (1) 0 

Navy Recruiting District Headquarters Montgomery

Close (31) 0 (5) (31) (5) 0 

Navy Reserve Center Tuscaloosa AL Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 The Adjutant General Bldg, AL Army National Guard Montgomery

Close (85) 0 0 (85) 0 0 

Wright U.S. Army Reserve Center Close (8) 0 (1) (8) (1) 0 Anniston Army Depot Gain 0 1,121 (87) 0 1,034 0 Dannelly Field Air Guard Station Gain 0 42 0 18 42 18 Fort Rucker Gain (423) 234 (80) 1,734 154 2,157 Redstone Arsenal Gain (1,322) 1,874 (288) (986) 1,586 336 Birmingham Armed Forces Reserve Center

Realign (146) 0 (159) (146) (159) 0 

Birmingham International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (66) 0 (117) (66) (117) 0 

Maxwell Air Force Base Realign (740) 0 (511) (740) (511) 0 

Alabama Total (2,937) 3,271 (1,253) (404) 2,018 2,533 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Alaska Kulis Air Guard Station Close (218) 0 (241) (218) (241) 0 Eielson Air Force Base Realign (2,821) 0 (319) (2,821) (319) 0 Elmendorf Air Force Base Realign (1,499) 233 (65) (1,102) 168 397 Fort Richardson Realign (86) 0 (199) (86) (199) 0 

Alaska Total (4,624) 233 (824) (4,227) (591) 397 

ArizonaAir Force Research Lab, Mesa City Close (42) 0 (46) (42) (46) 0 Allen Hall Armed Forces Reserve Center, Tucson

Close (60) 0 0 (60) 0 0 

Leased Space - AZ Close/Realign 0 0 (1) 0 (1) 0 Marine Corps Air Station Yuma Gain 0 5 0 0 5 0 Phoenix Sky Harbor I Gain 0 29 0 10 29 10 Fort Huachuca Realign 0 44 (212) 0 (168) 0 Luke Air Force Base Realign (101) 0 (177) (101) (177) 0 

Arizona Total (203) 78 (436) (193) (358) 10 

ArkansasEl Dorado Armed Forces Reserve Center

Close (24) 0 0 (24) 0 0 

Stone U.S. Army Reserve Center, Pine Bluff

Close (30) 0 (4) (30) (4) 0 

Little Rock Air Force Base Gain (16) 319 0 3,579 319 3,595 Camp Pike (90th) Realign (86) 0 (91) (86) (91) 0 Fort Smith Regional Realign (19) 0 (59) (19) (59) 0 

Arkansas Total (175) 319 (154) 3,420 165 3,595 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

CaliforniaArmed Forces Reserve Center Bell Close (72) 0 0 (24) 0 48 Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Oakland

Close 0 0 (50) 0 (50) 0 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, San Bernardino

Close 0 0 (120) 0 (120) 0 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, San Diego

Close (3) 0 (237) (3) (237) 0 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Seaside

Close (10) 0 (51) (10) (51) 0 

Naval Support Activity Corona Close (6) 0 (886) (6) (886) 0 Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach Det Concord

Close 0 0 (71) 0 (71) 0 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center, Encino

Close (33) 0 0 (33) 0 0 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center, Los Angeles

Close (48) 0 0 (48) 0 0 

Onizuka Air Force Station Close (107) 0 (171) (107) (171) 0 Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant Close 0 0 (4) 0 (4) 0 Leased Space - CA Close/Realign (2) 0 (14) (2) (14) 0 AFRC Moffett Field Gain 0 166 0 87 166 87 Channel Islands Air Guard Station Gain 0 15 0 4 15 4 Edwards Air Force Base Gain (14) 42 0 9 42 23 Fort Hunter Liggett Gain 0 18 0 25 18 25 Fresno Air Terminal Gain 0 254 0 57 254 57 Marine Corps Base Miramar Gain (46) 34 (3) 41 31 87 Marine Corps Reserve Center Pasadena CA

Gain 0 0 0 25 0 25 

Naval Air Station Lemore Gain (39) 35 0 5 35 44 Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake Gain (44) 2,329 (14) 154 2,315 198 Naval Base Point Loma Gain (12) 350 (341) 300 9 312 Naval Station San Diego Gain (1) 86 (2) 1,084 84 1,085 This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Vandenburg Air Force Base Gain 0 101 0 44 101 44 Beale Air Force Base Realign (8) 0 (171) (8) (171) 0 Camp Parks (91st) Realign (25) 0 (18) (25) (18) 0 Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin

Realign 0 0 (31) 0 (31) 0 

Human Resources Support Center Southwest

Realign 0 0 (164) 0 (164) 0 

Los Alamitos (63rd) Realign (92) 0 (78) (92) (78) 0 March Air Reserve Base Realign (71) 4 (44) (71) (40) 0 Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Realign (145) 7 (6) (145) 1 0 Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow Realign (140) 0 (330) (140) (330) 0 Naval Base Coronado Realign (71) 198 (587) (71) (389) 0 Naval Base Ventura City Realign (244) 854 (2,149) (239) (1,295) 5 Naval Medical Center San Diego Realign (1,596) 0 (33) (1,596) (33) 0 Naval Weapons Station Fallbrook Realign 0 0 (118) 0 (118) 0 

California Total (2,829) 4,493 (5,693) (785) (1,200) 2,044 

ColoradoLeased Space - CO Close/Realign 0 0 (11) 0 (11) 0 Buckley Air Force Base Gain 0 81 0 13 81 13 Fort Carson Gain 0 199 0 4,178 199 4,178 Peterson Air Force Base Gain 0 19 (27) 482 (8) 482 Schriever Air Force Base Gain 0 51 0 44 51 44 Air Reserve Personnel Center Realign (159) 1,500 (1,447) (102) 53 57 United States Air Force Academy Realign (30) 0 (9) (30) (9) 0 

Colorado Total (189) 1,850 (1,494) 4,585 356 4,774 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

ConnecticutSGT Libby U.S. Army Reserve Center, New Haven

Close (14) 0 (7) (14) (7) 0 

Submarine Base New London Close (7,096) 0 (952) (7,096) (952) 0 Turner U.S. Army Reserve Center, Fairfield 

Close (13) 0 (4) (13) (4) 0 

U.S. Army Reserve Center Area Maintenance Support Facility Middletown 

Close (13) 0 (5) (13) (5) 0 

Bradley International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (23) 15 (88) 3 (73) 26 

Connecticut Total (7,159) 15 (1,056) (7,133) (1,041) 26 

DelawareKirkwood U.S. Army Reserve Center, Newark

Close (7) 0 (2) (7) (2) 0 

Dover Air Force Base Gain 0 133 0 115 133 115 New Castle County Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (47) 0 (101) (47) (101) 0 

Delaware Total (54) 133 (103) 61 30 115 

District of Columbia Leased Space - DC Close/Realign (103) 79 (68) (103) 11 0 Bolling Air Force Base Realign (96) 0 (242) (96) (242) 0 Naval District Washington Realign (108) 522 (845) (80) (323) 28 Potomac Annex Realign (4) 0 (5) (4) (5) 0 Walter Reed Army Medical Center Realign (2,679) 31 (2,388) (2,651) (2,357) 28 

District of Columbia Total (2,990) 632 (3,548) (2,934) (2,916) 56 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Florida Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Orlando

Close (9) 0 (200) (9) (200) 0 

Navy Reserve Center ST Petersburg Close (12) 0 0 (12) 0 0 Eglin Air Force Base Gain (28) 120 (42) 2,140 78 2,168 Homestead Air Reserve Station Gain 0 83 (12) 0 71 0 Jacksonville International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 22 (6) 45 16 45 

MacDill Air Force Base Gain (292) 231 0 (130) 231 162 Naval Air Station Jacksonville Gain (72) 310 (245) 1,902 65 1,974 Naval Station Mayport Gain (6) 13 0 397 13 403 Hurlburt Field Realign (48) 0 (6) (48) (6) 0 Naval Air Station Pensacola Realign (857) 124 (1,304) (302) (1,180) 555 Naval Support Activity Panama City Realign (12) 0 (12) (12) (12) 0 Patrick Air Force Base Realign (136) 0 (59) (136) (59) 0 Tyndall Air Force Base Realign (48) 0 (19) (37) (19) 11 

Florida Total (1,520) 903 (1,905) 3,798 (1,002) 5,318 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

GeorgiaFort Gillem Close (517) 0 (570) (511) (570) 6 Fort McPherson Close (2,260) 0 (1,881) (2,260) (1,881) 0 Inspector/Instructor Rome GA Close (9) 0 0 (9) 0 0 Naval Air Station Atlanta Close (1,274) 0 (156) (1,274) (156) 0 Naval Supply Corps School Athens Close (393) 0 (108) (389) (108) 4 Peachtree Leases Atlanta Close (65) 0 (97) (65) (97) 0 U.S. Army Reserve Center Columbus Close (9) 0 0 (9) 0 0 Dobbins Air Reserve Base Gain 0 45 0 73 45 73 Fort Benning Gain (842) 687 (69) 9,221 618 10,063 Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany Gain (2) 193 (42) (1) 151 1 Moody Air Force Base Gain (604) 50 (145) 670 (95) 1,274 Robins Air Force Base Gain (484) 224 (225) (31) (1) 453 Savannah International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 21 0 17 21 17 

Submarine Base Kings Bay Gain 0 102 0 3,245 102 3,245 

Georgia Total (6,459) 1,322 (3,293) 8,677 (1,971) 15,136 

GuamAndersen Air Force Base Realign (64) 0 (31) (64) (31) 0 

Guam Total (64) 0 (31) (64) (31) 0 

Hawaii Army National Guard Reserve Center Honokaa 

Close (118) 0 0 (118) 0 0 

Naval Station Pearl Harbor Gain (29) 324 (213) (29) 111 0 Hickam Air Force Base Realign (311) 7 (117) (152) (110) 159 

Hawaii Total (458) 331 (330) (299) 1 159 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

IdahoNavy Reserve Center Pocatello Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Boise Air Terminal Air Guard Station Realign (22) 1 (62) (22) (61) 0 Mountain Home Air Force Base Realign (1,235) 23 (54) (538) (31) 697 

Idaho Total (1,264) 24 (116) (567) (92) 697 

Illinois Armed Forces Reserve Center Carbondale 

Close (32) 0 0 (32) 0 0 

Navy Reserve Center Forest Park Close (15) 0 0 (15) 0 0 Greater Peoria Regio Gain 0 21 0 13 21 13 Scott Air Force Base Gain (252) 832 0 (121) 832 131 Capital Airport Air Guard Station Realign (52) 0 (133) (30) (133) 22 Fort Sheridan Realign (17) 0 (17) (17) (17) 0 Naval Station Great Lakes Realign (2,005) 101 (124) (1,989) (23) 16 Rock Island Arsenal Realign (3) 120 (1,537) 154 (1,417) 157 

Illinois Total (2,376) 1,074 (1,811) (2,037) (737) 339 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Indiana Navy Marine Corps Reserve Center Grissom Air Reserve Base, Bunker Hill

Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 

Navy Recruiting District Headquarters Indianapolis

Close (27) 0 (5) (27) (5) 0 

Navy Reserve Center Evansville Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Newport Chemical Depot Close (210) 0 (81) (210) (81) 0 U.S. Army Reserve Center Lafeyette Close (21) 0 0 (21) 0 0 U.S. Army Reserve Center Seston Close (12) 0 0 (12) 0 0 Leased Space - IN Close/Realign (25) 0 (111) (25) (111) 0 Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Indianapolis

Gain 0 3,478 (100) 114 3,378 114 

Fort Wayne International Airport Air Guard Station 

Gain (5) 256 0 57 256 62 

Hulman Regional Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (12) 0 (124) (12) (124) 0 

Naval Support Activity Crane Realign 0 0 (672) 0 (672) 0 

Indiana Total (326) 3,734 (1,093) (150) 2,641 176 

Iowa Navy Reserve Center Cedar Rapds Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Navy Reserve Center Sioux City Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Dubuque

Close (19) 0 (5) (19) (5) 0 

Des Moines International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain (31) 196 (172) 23 24 54 

Sioux Gateway Airport Air Guard Gain 0 170 0 33 170 33 Armed Forces Reserve Center Camp Dodge 

Realign (217) 0 (1) (217) (1) 0 

Iowa Total (281) 366 (178) (194) 188 87 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Kansas Kansas Army Ammunition Plant Close 0 0 (8) 0 (8) 0 Forbes Field Air Guard Station Gain 0 194 0 53 194 53 Fort Leavenworth Gain (16) 8 0 195 8 211 Fort Riley Gain 0 440 0 2,415 440 2,415 McConnell Air Force Base Gain (27) 28 (183) 677 (155) 704 U.S. Army Reserve Center Wichita Realign (22) 0 (56) (22) (56) 0 

Kansas Total (65) 670 (247) 3,318 423 3,383 

Kentucky Army National Guard Reserve Center Paducah 

Close (31) 0 0 (31) 0 0 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Lexington

Close (5) 0 (40) (5) (40) 0 

Navy Reserve Center Lexington Close (9) 0 0 (9) 0 0 U.S. Army Reserve Center Louisville Close (30) 0 (13) (30) (13) 0 U.S. Army Reserve Center Maysville Close (16) 0 (2) (16) (2) 0 Louisville International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 6 0 0 6 0 

Fort Campbell Realign (433) 9 0 (360) 9 73 Fort Knox Realign (10,159) 2,511 (772) (4,867) 1,739 5,292 Navy Recruiting Command Louisville Realign (6) 0 (217) (6) (217) 0 

Kentucky Total (10,689) 2,526 (1,044) (5,324) 1,482 5,365 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

LouisianaBaton Rouge Army National Guard Reserve Center

Close (128) 0 0 (117) 0 11 

Naval Support Activity New Orleans Close (1,997) 0 (652) (1,997) (652) 0 Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Baton Rouge

Close (18) 0 0 (18) 0 0 

Roberts U.S. Army Reserve Center, Baton Rouge 

Close (30) 0 0 (30) 0 0 

Leased Space - Slidell Close/Realign (1) 0 (102) (1) (102) 0 Barksdale Air Force Base Gain 0 60 0 5 60 5 Naval Air Station New Orleans Gain 0 446 0 1,407 446 1,407 Naval Air Station New Orleans Air Reserve Station

Realign (4) 76 (308) 41 (232) 45 

Louisiana Total (2,178) 582 (1,062) (710) (480) 1,468 

MaineDefense Finance and Accounting Service, Limestone

Close 0 0 (241) 0 (241) 0 

Naval Reserve Center, Bangor Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Naval Shipyard Portsmouth Close (201) 0 (4,032) (201) (4,032) 0 Bangor International Airport Air Guard Station 

Gain 0 195 0 45 195 45 

Naval Air Station Brunswick Realign (2,317) 0 (61) (2,317) (61) 0 

Maine Total (2,525) 195 (4,334) (2,480) (4,139) 45 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Maryland Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Patuxent River

Close 0 0 (53) 0 (53) 0 

Navy Reserve Center Adelphi Close (17) 0 0 (17) 0 0 PFC Flair U.S. Army Reserve Center, Frederick 

Close (20) 0 (2) (20) (2) 0 

Leased Space - MD Close/Realign (19) 0 (156) (19) (156) 0 Aberdeen Proving Ground Gain (3,862) 5,661 (290) (3,411) 5,371 451 Andrews Air Force Base Gain (416) 489 (189) 191 300 607 Fort Detrick Gain 0 43 0 76 43 76 Fort Meade Gain (2) 2,915 0 682 2,915 684 National Naval Medical Center Bethesda

Gain 0 936 0 982 936 982 

Naval Air Station Patuxent River Gain (10) 226 (142) (3) 84 7 Naval Surface Weapons Station Carderock

Gain 0 6 0 0 6 0 

Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi Realign 0 0 (43) 0 (43) 0 Bethesda/Chevy Chase Realign (5) 0 (2) (5) (2) 0 Fort Lewis Realign 0 0 (164) 0 (164) 0 Martin State Airport Air Guard Station Realign (17) 0 (106) (17) (106) 0 Naval Air Facility Washington Realign (9) 0 (9) (9) (9) 0 Naval Station Annapolis Realign 0 0 (13) 0 (13) 0 Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head

Realign 0 42 (137) 0 (95) 0 

Maryland Total (4,377) 10,318 (1,306) (1,570) 9,012 2,807 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

MassachusettsMalony U.S. Army Reserve Center Close (100) 0 (55) (100) (55) 0 Otis Air Guard Base Close (62) 0 (443) (62) (443) 0 Westover U.S. Army Reserve Center, Cicopee 

Close (13) 0 0 (13) 0 0 

Barnes Municipal Airport Air Guard Station 

Gain 0 89 (5) 23 84 23 

Hanscom Air Force Base Gain (47) 828 (223) 499 605 546 Westover Air Force Base Gain 0 11 0 69 11 69 Natick Soldier Systems Center Realign 0 0 (19) 0 (19) 0 Naval Shipyard Puget Sound-Boston Detachment

Realign 0 0 (108) 0 (108) 0 

Massachusetts Total (222) 928 (853) 416 75 638 

Michigan Navy Reserve Center Marquette Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Parisan U.S. Army Reserve Center, Lansing 

Close (25) 0 0 (25) 0 0 

Selfridge Army Activity Close (126) 0 (174) (126) (174) 0 W. K. Kellogg Airport Air Guard Station 

Close (68) 0 (206) (68) (206) 0 

Detroit Arsenal Gain (4) 751 (104) 0 647 4 Selfridge Air National Guard Base Gain (3) 167 (76) 69 91 72 

Michigan Total (233) 918 (560) (157) 358 76 

MinnesotaNavy Reserve Center Duluth Close (8) 0 0 (8) 0 0 Fort Snelling Realign (130) 0 (124) (130) (124) 0 

Minnesota Total (138) 0 (124) (138) (124) 0 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

MississippiMississippi Army Ammunition Plant Close 0 0 (4) 0 (4) 0 Naval Station Pascagoula Close (844) 0 (112) (844) (112) 0 U.S. Army Reserve Center Vicksburg Close (26) 0 (2) (26) (2) 0 Columbus Air Force Base Gain 0 3 0 104 3 104 Jackson International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 1 0 0 1 0 

Human Resources Support Center Southeast

Realign 0 0 (138) 0 (138) 0 

Keesler Air Force Base Realign (181) 0 (31) (181) (31) 0 Key Field Air Guard Station Realign (33) 0 (142) (33) (142) 0 Naval Air Station Meridian Realign (15) 0 0 (15) 0 0 

Mississippi Total (1,099) 4 (429) (995) (425) 104 

MissouriArmy National Guard Reserve Center Jefferson Barracks

Close (67) 0 0 (67) 0 0 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Kansas City

Close (37) 0 (576) (37) (576) 0 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, St. Louis

Close (2) 0 (291) (2) (291) 0 

Marine Corps Support Center Kansas City

Close (191) 0 (139) (191) (139) 0 

Navy Recruiting District Headquarters Kansas

Close (21) 0 (6) (21) (6) 0 

Navy Reserve Center Cape Girardeau Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Leased Space - MO Close/Realign (709) 0 (1,234) (709) (1,234) 0 Rosecrans Memorial Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 27 0 8 27 8 

Whiteman Air Force Base Gain 0 58 0 3 58 3 Fort Leonard Wood Realign (181) 25 (2) (110) 23 71 Lambert International Airport- St Louis Realign (34) 0 (215) (34) (215) 0 

Missouri Total (1,249) 110 (2,463) (1,167) (2,353) 82 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Montana Galt Hall U.S. Army Reserve Center, Great Falls

Close (14) 0 (3) (14) (3) 0 

Great Falls International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (26) 0 (81) (26) (81) 0 

Montana Total (40) 0 (84) (40) (84) 0 

Nebraska Army National Guard Reserve Center Columbus 

Close (31) 0 0 (31) 0 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Grand Island 

Close (31) 0 0 (31) 0 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Kearny

Close (8) 0 0 (8) 0 0 

Naval Recruiting District Headquarters Omaha

Close (19) 0 (7) (19) (7) 0 

Navy Reserve Center Lincoln Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Offutt Air Force Base Realign 0 69 (227) 54 (158) 54 

Nebraska Total (96) 69 (234) (42) (165) 54 

NevadaHawthorne Army Depot Close (74) 0 (45) (74) (45) 0 Nellis Air Force Base Gain (265) 268 (5) 1,149 263 1,414 Naval Air Station Fallon Realign (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Reno-Tahoe International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (23) 0 (124) (23) (124) 0 

Nevada Total (369) 268 (174) 1,045 94 1,414 

New HampshireDoble U.S. Army Reserve Center Portsmouth

Close (39) 0 (5) (39) (5) 0 

Armed Forces Reserve Center Pease Air Force Base

Gain 0 28 0 20 28 20 

New Hampshire Total (39) 28 (5) (19) 23 20 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

New Jersey Fort Monmouth Close (620) 0 (4,652) (620) (4,652) 0 Inspector/Instructor Center West Trenton

Close (11) 0 (1) (11) (1) 0 

Kilmer U.S. Army Reserve Center, Edison 

Close (23) 0 (21) (23) (21) 0 

SFC Nelson V. Brittin U.S. Army Reserve Center

Close (34) 0 (1) (34) (1) 0 

Atlantic City International Airport Air Guard Station 

Gain (3) 263 (53) 59 210 62 

Fort Dix Gain 0 144 0 209 144 209 McGuire Air Force Base Gain 0 37 0 498 37 498 Picatinny Arsenal Gain 0 688 0 5 688 5 Naval Air Engineering Station Lakehurst

Realign (132) 0 (54) (132) (54) 0 

Naval Weapons Station Earle Realign 0 0 (63) 2 (63) 2 

New Jersey Total (823) 1,132 (4,845) (47) (3,713) 776 

New Mexico Cannon Air Force Base Close (2,385) 0 (384) (2,385) (384) 0 Jenkins Armed Forces Reserve Center Albuquerque 

Close (35) 0 (1) (35) (1) 0 

Kirtland Air Force Base Gain (7) 176 0 30 176 37 Holloman Air Force Base Realign (17) 0 0 (17) 0 0 White Sands Missile Range Realign (13) 0 (165) (13) (165) 0 

New Mexico Total (2,457) 176 (550) (2,420) (374) 37 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

New York Armed Forces Reserve Center Amityville 

Close (24) 0 (4) (24) (4) 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Niagara Falls

Close (1) 0 0 (1) 0 0 

Carpenter U.S. Army Reserve Center,Poughkeepie

Close (8) 0 (1) (8) (1) 0 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Rome

Close 0 0 (290) 0 (290) 0 

Navy Recruiting District Headquarters Buffalo

Close (25) 0 (6) (25) (6) 0 

Navy Reserve Center Glenn Falls Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Navy Reserve Center Horsehead Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Navy Reserve Center Watertown Close (9) 0 0 (9) 0 0 Niagara Falls International Airport Air Guard Station 

Close (115) 0 (527) (115) (527) 0 

United States Military Academy Gain 0 38 0 226 38 226 Fort Totten / Pyle Realign (75) 0 (74) (75) (74) 0 Rome Laboratory Realign (13) 0 (124) (13) (124) 0 Schenectady County Air Guard Station Realign (10) 0 (9) (10) (9) 0 

New York Total (294) 38 (1,035) (68) (997) 226 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

North Carolina Navy Reserve Center Asheville Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Niven U.S. Army Reserve Center, Albermarle

Close (34) 5 0 (34) 5 0 

Charlotte/Douglas International Airport Gain 0 0 0 6 0 6 Fort Bragg Gain (1,352) 247 0 4,078 247 5,430 Seymore Johnson Air Force Base Gain 0 17 0 345 17 345 Army Research Office, Durham Realign (1) 0 (113) (1) (113) 0 Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point Realign (16) 8 (664) 48 (656) 64 Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune Realign (182) 15 (16) (182) (1) 0 Pope Air Force Base Realign (5,969) 1,153 (345) (4,821) 808 1,148 

North Carolina Total (7,561) 1,445 (1,138) (568) 307 6,993 

North Dakota Grand Forks Air Force Base Realign (2,290) 0 (355) (2,290) (355) 0 

North Dakota Total (2,290) 0 (355) (2,290) (355) 0 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Ohio Army National Guard Reserve Center Mansfield 

Close (59) 0 (2) (59) (2) 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Westerville

Close (12) 0 0 (12) 0 0 

Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Dayton

Close 0 0 (230) 0 (230) 0 

Mansfield Lahm Municipal Airport Air Guard Station

Close (63) 0 (171) (63) (171) 0 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Akron

Close (26) 0 0 (26) 0 0 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Cleveland

Close (24) 0 (1) (24) (1) 0 

Parrott U.S. Army Reserve Center Kenton

Close (9) 0 (1) (9) (1) 0 

U.S. Army Reserve Center Whitehall Close (25) 0 0 (25) 0 0 Leased Space - OH Close/Realign 0 0 (187) 0 (187) 0 Armed Forces Reserve Center Akron 

Gain 0 0 0 37 0 37 

Defense Supply Center Columbus Gain (2) 2,655 (960) 63 1,695 65 Rickenbacker International Airport Air Guard Station 

Gain 0 1 0 0 1 0 

Toledo Express Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 112 0 14 112 14 

Wright Patterson Air Force Base Gain (69) 559 (729) 589 (170) 658 Youngstown-Warren Regional Airport Gain 0 8 0 0 8 0 Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Cleveland

Realign (15) 0 (1,013) (15) (1,013) 0 

Glenn Research Center Realign 0 0 (50) 0 (50) 0 Rickenbacker Army National Guard Bldg 943 Columbus

Realign (4) 0 0 (4) 0 0 

Springfield-Beckley Municipal Airport Air Guard Station

Realign (66) 0 (225) (66) (225) 0 

Ohio Total (374) 3,335 (3,569) 400 (234) 774 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Oklahoma Armed Forces Reserve Center Broken Arrow

Close (26) 0 0 6 0 32 

Armed Forces Reserve Center Muskogee

Close (14) 0 (2) (14) (2) 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Tishomingo

Close (30) 0 0 (30) 0 0 

Krowse U.S. Army Reserve Center Oklahoma City

Close (78) 0 (6) (78) (6) 0 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Tulsa

Close (32) 0 0 (32) 0 0 

Oklahoma City (95th) Close (31) 0 (22) (31) (22) 0 Fort Sill Gain (892) 337 (176) 3,444 161 4,336 Tinker Air Force Base Gain (9) 552 (197) 0 355 9 Tulsa International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 81 0 22 81 22 

Vance Air Force Base Gain 0 6 0 93 6 93 Altus Air Force Base Realign (16) 0 0 (16) 0 0 Will Rogers World Airport Air Guard Station

Realign (19) 46 (145) 84 (99) 103 

Oklahoma Total (1,147) 1,022 (548) 3,448 474 4,595 

Oregon Navy Reserve Center Central Point Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Umatilla Army Depot Close (127) 0 (385) (127) (385) 0 Portland International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (112) 0 (452) (112) (452) 0 

Oregon Total (246) 0 (837) (246) (837) 0 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Pennsylvania Bristol Close (9) 0 (2) (9) (2) 0 Engineering Field Activity Northeast Close (4) 0 (188) (4) (188) 0 Kelly Support Center Close (174) 0 (136) (174) (136) 0 Naval Air Station Willow Grove Close (865) 0 (362) (865) (362) 0 Navy Crane Center Lester Close (1) 0 (54) (1) (54) 0 Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Reading

Close (18) 0 0 (18) 0 0 

North Penn U.S. Army Reserve Center, Norristown

Close (22) 0 (1) (22) (1) 0 

Pittsburgh International Airport Air Reserve Station

Close (44) 0 (278) (44) (278) 0 

Serrenti U.S. Army Reserve Center, Scranton

Close (47) 0 (8) (47) (8) 0 

U.S. Army Reserve Center Bloomsburg Close (20) 0 (2) (20) (2) 0 U.S. Army Reserve Center Lewisburg Close (9) 0 (2) (9) (2) 0 U.S. Army Reserve Center Williamsport

Close (25) 0 (4) (25) (4) 0 

W. Reese U.S. Army Reserve Center/OMS, Chester

Close (9) 0 (1) (9) (1) 0 

Letterkenny Army Depot Gain 0 409 0 0 409 0 Naval Support Activity Philadelphia Gain 0 301 (10) 0 291 0 Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Lehigh

Gain 0 0 0 8 0 8 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Pittsburgh

Gain 0 0 0 7 0 7 

Tobyhanna Army Depot Gain (1) 355 (82) 2 273 3 Defense Distribution Depot Susquehanna

Realign 0 0 (15) 0 (15) 0 

Human Resources Support Center Northeast

Realign 0 0 (174) 0 (174) 0 

Marine Corps Reserve Center Johnstown

Realign (86) 0 0 (86) 0 0 

Naval Support Activity Mechanicsburg Realign 0 0 (11) 0 (11) 0 Navy Philadelphia Business Center Realign 0 0 (63) 0 (63) 0 This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Pitt U.S. Army Reserve Center, Corapolis

Realign (119) 0 (101) (119) (101) 0 

Pennsylvania Total (1,453) 1,065 (1,494) (1,435) (429) 18 

Puerto RicoArmy National Guard Reserve Center Humacao

Close (26) 0 0 (26) 0 0 

Lavergne U.S. Army Reserve Center Bayamon

Close (25) 0 (1) (25) (1) 0 

Aguadillla-Ramey U.S. Army Reserve Center/BMA-126

Realign (10) 0 0 (10) 0 0 

Camp Euripides Rubio, Puerto Nuevo Realign (43) 0 0 (43) 0 0 Fort Buchanan Realign (9) 0 (47) (9) (47) 0 

Puerto Rico Total (113) 0 (48) (113) (48) 0 

Rhode Island Harwood U.S. Army Reserve Center, Providence

Close (20) 0 (4) (20) (4) 0 

USARC Bristol Close (24) 0 0 (24) 0 0 Naval Station Newport Gain (122) 309 (225) 525 84 647 Quonset State Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 29 0 17 29 17 

Rhode Island Total (166) 338 (229) 498 109 664 

South Carolina Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Charleston

Close 0 0 (368) 0 (368) 0 

South Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Close (6) 0 (492) (6) (492) 0 

Fort Jackson Gain 0 180 0 435 180 435 Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort Gain 0 12 0 0 12 0 McEntire Air Guard Station Gain 0 8 0 418 8 418 Shaw Air Force Base Gain (74) 76 (1) 742 75 816 Naval Weapons Station Charleston Realign (170) 24 (149) (125) (125) 45 

South Carolina Total (250) 300 (1,010) 1,464 (710) 1,714 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

South Dakota Ellsworth Air Force Base Close (3,315) 0 (438) (3,315) (438) 0 Joe Foss Field Air Guard Station Gain (4) 27 0 28 27 32 

South Dakota Total (3,319) 27 (438) (3,287) (411) 32 

Tennessee U.S. Army Reserve Area Maintenance Support Facility Kingsport

Close (30) 0 (2) (30) (2) 0 

Leased Space - TN Close/Realign 0 0 (6) 0 (6) 0 McGee Tyson APT Air Guard Station Gain 0 190 0 58 190 58 Memphis International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 6 0 2 6 2 

Naval Support Activity Mid South Gain 0 601 0 372 601 372 Nashville International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (19) 0 (172) (19) (172) 0 

Tennessee Total (49) 797 (180) 383 617 432 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Texas Army National Guard Reserve Center # 2 Dallas 

Close (90) 0 0 (90) 0 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center (Hondo Pass) El Paso 

Close (106) 0 0 (106) 0 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center California Crossing 

Close (47) 0 0 (47) 0 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Ellington 

Close (14) 0 (45) (14) (45) 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Lufkin 

Close (10) 0 0 (10) 0 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Marshall

Close (15) 0 (1) (15) (1) 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center New Braunfels 

Close (106) 0 0 (106) 0 0 

Brooks City Base Close (1,297) 0 (1,268) (1,297) (1,268) 0 Defense Finance and Accounting Service, San Antonio

Close (32) 0 (303) (32) (303) 0 

Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant Close (2) 0 (18) (2) (18) 0 Naval Station Ingleside Close (1,901) 0 (260) (1,901) (260) 0 Navy Reserve Center Lubbock, TX Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Navy Reserve Center Orange,TX Close (11) 0 0 (11) 0 0 Red River Army Depot Close (9) 0 (2,491) (9) (2,491) 0 U.S. Army Reserve Center # 2 Houston Close (2) 0 0 (2) 0 0 Leased Space - TX Close/Realign (78) 0 (147) (78) (147) 0 Carswell ARS, Naval Air Station Fo Gain 0 116 (12) 8 104 8 Dyess Air Force Base Gain (1,615) 129 (65) 310 64 1,925 Fort Bliss Gain (4,564) 370 (223) 11,354 147 15,918 Fort Sam Houston Gain (117) 1,624 0 7,648 1,624 7,765 Laughlin Air Force Base Gain 0 80 0 102 80 102 Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Ft. Worth

Gain (54) 41 (5) 276 36 330 

Randolph Air Force Base Gain (576) 705 (174) (412) 531 164 This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Corpus Christi Army Depot Realign 0 0 (92) 0 (92) 0 Ellington Field Air Guard Station Realign 0 0 (3) 0 (3) 0 Fort Hood Realign (9,135) 0 (118) (73) (118) 9,062 Lackland Air Force Base Realign (2,489) 453 (1,223) (2,254) (770) 235 Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Realign (926) 0 (89) (926) (89) 0 Sheppard Air Force Base Realign (2,519) 2 (158) (2,468) (156) 51 

Texas Total (25,722) 3,520 (6,695) 9,838 (3,175) 35,560 

Utah Deseret Chemical Depot Close (186) 0 (62) (186) (62) 0 Fort Douglas Realign (15) 0 (38) (15) (38) 0 Hill Air Force Base Realign (13) 24 (447) 278 (423) 291 

Utah Total (214) 24 (547) 77 (523) 291 

Vermont Burlington International Airport Air Guard Station

Gain 0 53 0 3 53 3 

Vermont Total 0 53 0 3 53 3 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Virginia Fort Monroe Close (1,393) 0 (1,948) (1,393) (1,948) 0 Leased Space - VA Close/Realign (6,199) 0 (15,754) (6,199) (15,754) 0 Defense Supply Center Richmond Gain 0 83 (77) 0 6 0 Fort Belvoir Gain (466) 8,010 (2,281) 4,071 5,729 4,537 Fort Lee Gain (392) 1,151 (2) 6,139 1,149 6,531 Headquarters Battalion, Headquarters Marine Corps, Henderson Hall

Gain (52) 206 (22) 401 184 453 

Langley Air Force Base Gain (53) 68 (46) 727 22 780 Marine Corps Base Quantico Gain (50) 1,357 0 446 1,357 496 Naval Amphibious Base Little Creek Gain 0 27 0 10 27 10 Naval Shipyard Norfolk Gain 0 1,774 0 177 1,774 177 Naval Station Norfolk Gain (373) 356 (1,085) 3,447 (729) 3,820 Naval Support Activity Norfolk Gain (6) 205 0 567 205 573 Arlington Service Center Realign (224) 406 (516) 211 (110) 435 Center for Naval Research Realign (25) 0 (313) (25) (313) 0 Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Arlington

Realign (7) 0 (401) (7) (401) 0 

Fort Eustis Realign (3,863) 1,432 (852) (2,901) 580 962 Naval Air Station Oceana Realign (110) 53 (3) (110) 50 0 Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Realign (463) 0 (25) (435) (25) 28 Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren

Realign 0 169 (503) 0 (334) 0 

Naval Weapons Station Yorktown Realign 0 0 (179) 0 (179) 0 Richmond International Airport Air Guard Station 

Realign (25) 0 (101) (25) (101) 0 

U.S. Marine Corps Direct Reporting Program Manager Advanced Amphibious Assault

Realign 0 0 (32) 0 (32) 0 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Virginia Total (13,701) 15,297 (24,140) 5,101 (8,843) 18,802 

Washington 1LT Richard H. Walker U.S. Army Reserve Center

Close (38) 0 0 (38) 0 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Everett 

Close (57) 0 0 (57) 0 0 

Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Tacoma

Close (20) 0 0 (20) 0 0 

U.S. Army Reserve Center Fort Lawton Close (53) 0 (54) (53) (54) 0 Vancover Barracks Close (29) 0 (16) (29) (16) 0 Fort Lewis Gain (2) 46 (1) 185 45 187 Human Resources Support Center Northwest

Gain 0 23 0 0 23 0 

Naval Air Station Whidbey Island Gain (34) 173 0 (34) 173 0 Naval Station Bremerton Gain 0 1,401 0 0 1,401 0 Fairchild Air Force Base Realign (26) 0 (172) (26) (172) 0 McChord Air Force Base Realign (460) 7 (143) (424) (136) 36 Submarine Base Bangor Realign 0 0 (1) 0 (1) 0 

Washington Total (719) 1,650 (387) (496) 1,263 223 

West Virginia Bias U.S. Army Reserve Center, Huntington

Close (1) 0 0 (1) 0 0 

Fairmont U.S. Army Reserve Center Close (88) 0 0 (88) 0 0 Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Moundsville

Close (16) 0 0 (16) 0 0 

Ewvra Sheppard Air Guard Station Gain 0 3 0 7 3 7 Yeager Airport Air Guard Station Realign (27) 0 (129) (27) (129) 0 

West Virginia Total (132) 3 (129) (125) (126) 7 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
State

Action Installation Mil Civ Mil Civ Mil Civ

Out In Net Gain/(Loss) Ne

C

Wisconsin Gen Mitchell International Airport ARS Close (44) 56 (302) (20) (246) 24 Navy Reserve Center La Crosse Close (7) 0 0 (7) 0 0 Navy-Marine Corps Reserve Center Madison

Close (23) 0 (3) (23) (3) 0 

Olson U.S. Army Reserve Center, Madison

Close (113) 0 0 (113) 0 0 

U.S. Army Reserve Center O'Connell Close (11) 0 (1) (11) (1) 0 Armed Forces Reserve Center Madison

Gain 0 8 0 40 8 40 

Dane County Airport Gain (4) 37 0 18 37 22 Fort McCoy Realign (379) 133 (82) (282) 51 97 

Wisconsin Total (581) 234 (388) (398) (154) 183 

Wyoming Army Aviation Support Facility Cheyenne 

Close (23) 0 0 (23) 0 0 

Army National Guard Reserve Center Thermopolis

Close (19) 0 0 (19) 0 0 

Cheyenne Airport Air Guard Station Gain 0 58 0 21 58 21 

Wyoming Total (42) 58 0 (21) 58 21 

zz Germany, Korea, and UndistributedUndistributed or Overseas Reductions Realign (14,889) 670 (2) (14,171) 668 718 

zz Germany, Korea, and Total (14,889) 670 (2) (14,171) 668 718 

Undistributed

Grand Total (133,769) (84,801) (10,782) (18,223) 122,987 

66,578 

This list does not include locations where there were no changes in military or civilian jobs. Military figures include student load changes.
D-1

Appendix D 

Legislation 

DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT ACT OF 1990 

(As amended through FY 05 Authorization Act)

SEC. 2901. SHORT TITLE AND PURPOSE 

(a) SHORT TITLE.--This part may be cited as the "Defense Base Closure and Realignment 

Act of 1990". 

(b) PURPOSE.--The purpose of this part is to provide a fair process that will result in the 

timely closure and realignment of military installations inside the United States. 

SEC. 2902. THE COMMISSION

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.--There is established an independent commission to be known as 

the "Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission". 

(b) DUTIES.--The Commission shall carry out the duties specified for it in this part. 

(c) APPOINTMENT.--(1)(A) The Commission shall be composed of eight members 

appointed by the President, by and with the advise and consent of the Senate. 

(B) The President shall transmit to the Senate the nominations for appointment to the 

Commission-- 

(i) by no later than January 3, 1991, in the case of members of the Commission 

whose terms will expire at the end of the first session of the 102nd Congress; 

(ii) by no later than January 25, 1993, in the case of members of the Commission 

whose terms will expire at the end of the first session of the 103rd Congress; and 

(iii) by no later than January 3, 1995, in the case of members of the Commission 

whose terms will expire at the end of the first session of the 104th Congress. 

(C) If the President does not transmit to Congress the nominations for appointment to the 

Commission on or before the date specified for 1993 in clause (ii) of subparagraph (B) or for 

1995 in clause (iii) of such subparagraph, the process by which military installations may be 

selected for closure or realignment under this part with respect to that year shall be terminated. 

(2) In selecting individuals for nominations for appointments to the Commission, the 

President should consult with-- 

(A) the Speaker of the House of Representatives concerning the appointment of 

two members; 

(B) the majority leader of the Senate concerning the appointment of two 

members; 
D-2

(C) the minority leader of the House of Representatives concerning the 

appointment of one member; and 

(D) the minority leader of the Senate concerning the appointment of one member. 

(3) At the time the President nominates individuals for appointment to the Commission 

for each session of Congress referred to in paragraph (1)(B), the President shall designate one 

such individual who shall serve as Chairman of the Commission. 

(d) TERMS.--(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), each member of the Commission 

shall serve until the adjournment of Congress sine die for the session during which the member 

was appointed to the Commission. 

(2) The Chairman of the Commission shall serve until the confirmation of a successor. 

(e) MEETINGS.--(1) The Commission shall meet only during calendar years 1991, 1993, 

and 1995. 

(2)(A) Each meeting of the Commission, other than meetings in which classified 

information is to be discussed, shall be open to the public. 

(B) All the proceedings, information, and deliberations of the Commission shall be open, 

upon request, to the following: 

(i) The Chairman and the ranking minority party member of the Subcommittee on 

Readiness, Sustainability, and Support of the Committee on Armed Services of the 

Senate, or such other members of the Subcommittee designated by such Chairman or 

ranking minority party member. 

(ii) The Chairman and the ranking minority party member of the Subcommittee 

on Military Installations and Facilities of the Committee on Armed Services of the House 

of Representatives, or such other members of the Subcommittee designated by such 

Chairman or ranking minority party member. 

(iii) The Chairmen and ranking minority party members of the Subcommittees on 

Military Construction of the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and of the 

House of Representatives, or such other members of the Subcommittees designated by 

such Chairmen or ranking minority party members. 

(f) VACANCIES.--A vacancy in the Commission shall be filled in the same manner as the 

original appointment, but the individual appointed to fill the vacancy shall serve only for the 

unexpired portion of the term for which the individual's predecessor was appointed. 

(g) PAY AND TRAVEL EXPENSES.--(1)(A) Each member, other than the Chairman, shall be 

paid at a rate equal to the daily equivalent of the minimum annual rate of basic pay payable for 

level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States Code, for each 

day (including travel time) during which the member is engaged in the actual performance of 

duties vested in the Commission. 

(B) The Chairman shall be paid for each day referred to in subparagraph (A) at a rate 

equal to the daily equivalent of the minimum annual rate of basic pay payable for level III of the 

Executive Schedule under section 5314, of title 5, United States Code. 

(2) Members shall receive travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in 

accordance with sections 5702 and 5703 of title 5, United States Code. 
D-3

(h) DIRECTOR OF STAFF.--(1) The Commission shall, without regard to section 5311(b) of 

title 5, United States Code, appoint a Director who has not served on active duty in the Armed 

Forces or as a civilian employee of the Department of Defense during the one-year period 

preceding the date of such appointment. 

(2) The Director shall be paid at the rate of basic pay payable for level IV of the 

Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States Code. 

(i) STAFF.--(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the Director, with the approval of the 

Commission, may appoint and fix the pay of additional personnel. 

(2) The Director may make such appointments without regard to the provisions of title 5, 

United States Code, governing appointments in the competitive service, and any personnel so 

appointed may be paid without regard to the provisions of chapter 51 and subchapter III of 

chapter 53 of that title relating to classification and General Schedule pay rates, except that an 

individual so appointed may not receive pay in excess of the annual rate of basic pay payable for 

GS-18 of the General Schedule. 

(3)(A) Not more than one-third of the personnel employed by or detailed to the 

Commission may be on detail from the Department of Defense. 

(B)(i) Not more than one-fifth of the professional analysts of the Commission staff may 

be persons detailed from the Department of Defense to the Commission. 

(ii) No person detailed from the Department of Defense to the Commission may be 

assigned as the lead professional analyst with respect to a military department or defense agency. 

(C) A person may not be detailed from the Department of Defense to the Commission if, 

within 12 months before the detail is to begin, that person participated personally and 

substantially in any matter within the Department of Defense concerning the preparation of 

recommendations for closures or realignments of military installations. 

(D) No member of the Armed Forces, and no officer or employee of the Department of 

Defense, may-- 

(i) prepare any report concerning the effectiveness, fitness, or efficiency of the 

performance on the staff of the Commission of any person detailed from the Department 

of Defense to that staff; 

(ii) review the preparation of such a report; or 

(iii) approve or disapprove such a report. 

(4) Upon request of the Director, the head of any Federal department or agency may 

detail any of the personnel of that department or agency to the Commission to assist the 

Commission in carrying out its duties under this part. 

(5) The Comptroller General of the United States shall provide assistance, including the 

detailing of employees, to the Commission in accordance with an agreement entered into with 

the Commission. 

(6) The following restrictions relating to the personnel of the Commission shall apply 

during 1992 and 1994: 

(A) There may not be more than 15 persons on the staff at any one time. 

(B) The staff may perform only such functions as are necessary to prepare for the 

transition to new membership on the Commission in the following year. 

(C) No member of the Armed Forces and no employee of the Department of 

Defense may serve on the staff. 
D-4

(j) OTHER AUTHORITY.--(1) The Commission may procure by contract, to the extent 

funds are available, the temporary or intermittent services of experts or consultants pursuant to 

section 3109 of title 5, United States Code. 

(2) The Commission may lease space and acquire personal property to the extent funds 

are available. 

(k) FUNDING.--(1) There are authorized to be appropriated to the Commission such funds 

as are necessary to carry out its duties under this part. Such funds shall remain available until 

expended. 

(2) If no funds are appropriated to the Commission by the end of the second session of 

the 101st Congress, the Secretary of Defense may transfer, for fiscal year 1991, to the 

Commission funds from the Department of Defense Base Closure Account established by section 

207 of Public Law 100-526. Such funds shall remain available until expended. 

(3)(A) The Secretary may transfer not more than $300,000 from unobligated funds in the 

account referred to in subparagraph (B) for the purpose of assisting the Commission in carrying 

out its duties under this part during October, November, and December 1995. Funds transferred 

under the preceding sentence shall remain available until December 31, 1995. 

(B) The account referred to in subparagraph (A) is the Department of Defense Base 

Closure Account established under section 207(a) of the Defense Authorization Amendments 

and Base Closure and Realignment Act (Public Law 100-526; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note). 

(l) TERMINATION.--The Commission shall terminate on December 31, 1995. 

(m) PROHIBITION AGAINST RESTRICTING COMMUNICATIONS.--Section 1034 of title 10, 

United States Code, shall apply with respect to communications with the Commission. 

SEC. 2903. PROCEDURE FOR MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BASE

CLOSURES AND REALIGNMENTS

(a) FORCE-STRUCTURE PLAN.--(1) As part of the budget justification documents 

submitted to Congress in support of the budget for the Department of Defense for each of the 

fiscal years 1992, 1994, and 1996, the Secretary shall include a force-structure plan for the 

Armed Forces based on an assessment by the Secretary of the probable threats to the national 

security during the six-year period beginning with the fiscal year for which the budget request is 

made and of the anticipated levels of funding that will be available for national defense purposes 

during such period. 

(2) Such plan shall include, without any reference (directly or indirectly) to military 

installations inside the United States that may be closed or realigned under such plan-- 

(A) a description of the assessment referred to in paragraph (1); 

(B) a description (i) of the anticipated force structure during and at the end of 

such period for each military department (with specifications of the number and type of 

units in the active and reserve forces of each such department), and (ii) of the units that 

will need to be forward based (with a justification thereof) during and at the end of each 

such period; and 

(C) a description of the anticipated implementation of such force-structure plan. 
D-5

(3) The Secretary shall also transmit a copy of each such force-structure plan to the 

Commission. 

(b) SELECTION CRITERIA.--(1) The Secretary shall, by no later than December 31, 1990, 

publish in the Federal Register and transmit to the congressional defense committees the criteria 

proposed to be used by the Department of Defense in making recommendations for the closure 

or realignment of military installations inside the United States under this part. The Secretary 

shall provide an opportunity for public comment on the proposed criteria for a period of at least 

30 days and shall include notice of that opportunity in the publication required under the 

preceding sentence. 

(2)(A) The Secretary shall, by no later than February 15, 1991, publish in the Federal 

Register and transmit to the congressional defense committees the final criteria to be used in 

making recommendations for the closure or realignment of military installations inside the 

United States under this part. Except as provided in subparagraph (B), such criteria shall be the 

final criteria to be used, making such recommendations unless disapproved by a joint resolution 

of Congress enacted on or before March 15, 1991. 

(B) The Secretary may amend such criteria, but such amendments may not become 

effective until they have been published in the Federal Register, opened to public comment for 

at least 30 days, and then transmitted to the congressional defense committees in final form by 

no later than January 15 of the year concerned. Such amended criteria shall be the final criteria to 

be used, along with the force-structure plan referred to in subsection (a), in making such 

recommendations unless disapproved by a joint resolution of Congress enacted on or before 

February 15 of the year concerned. 

(c) DOD RECOMMENDATIONS.--(1) The Secretary may, by no later than April 15, 1991, 

March 15, 1993, and March 1, 1995, publish in the Federal Register and transmit to the 

congressional defense committees and to the Commission a list of the military installations 

inside the United States that the Secretary recommends for closure or realignment on the basis of 

the force-structure plan and the final criteria referred to in subsection (b)(2) that are applicable to 

the year concerned. 

(2) The Secretary shall include, with the list of recommendations published and 

transmitted pursuant to paragraph (1), a summary of the selection process that resulted in the 

recommendation for each installation, including a justification for each recommendation. The 

Secretary shall transmit the matters referred to in the preceding sentence not later than 7 days 

after the date of the transmittal to the congressional defense committees and the Commission of 

the list referred to in paragraph (1). 

(3)(A) In considering military installations for closure or realignment, the Secretary shall 

consider all military installations inside the United States equally without regard to whether the 

installation has been previously considered or proposed for closure or realignment by the 

Department. 

(B) In considering military installations for closure or realignment, the Secretary may not 

take into account for any purpose any advance conversion planning undertaken by an affected 

community with respect to the anticipated closure or realignment of an installation. 

(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B), in the case of a community anticipating the 

economic effects of a closure or realignment of a military installation, advance conversion 

planning-- 
D-6

(i) shall include community adjustment and economic diversification planning 

undertaken by the community before an anticipated selection of a military installation in 

or near the community for closure or realignment; and 

(ii) may include the development of contingency redevelopment plans, plans for 

economic development and diversification, and plans for the joint use (including civilian 

and military use, public and private use, civilian dual use, and civilian shared use) of the 

property or facilities of the installation after the anticipated closure or realignment. 

(4) In addition to making all information used by the Secretary to prepare the 

recommendations under this subsection available to Congress (including any committee or 

member of Congress), the Secretary shall also make such information available to the 

Commission and the Comptroller General of the United States. 

(5)(A) Each person referred to in subparagraph (B), when submitting information to the 

Secretary of Defense or the Commission concerning the closure or realignment of a military 

installation, shall certify that such information is accurate and complete to the best of that 

persons knowledge and belief. 

(B) Subparagraph (A) applies to the following persons: 

(i) The Secretaries of the military departments. 

(ii) The heads of the Defense Agencies. 

(iii) Each person who is in a position the duties of which include personal and 

substantial involvement in the preparation and submission of information and 

recommendations concerning the closure or realignment of military installations, as 

designated in regulations which the Secretary of Defense shall prescribe, regulations 

which the Secretary of each military department shall prescribe for personnel within that 

military department, or regulations which the head of each Defense Agency shall 

prescribe for personnel within that Defense Agency. 

(6) Any information provided to the Commission by a person described in paragraph 

(5)(B) shall also be submitted to the Senate and the House of Representatives to be made 

available to the Members of the House concerned in accordance with the rules of that House. 

The information shall be submitted to the Senate and House of Representatives within 24 hours 

after the submission of the information to the Commission. 

(d) REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE COMMISSION.--(1) After receiving the 

recommendations from the Secretary pursuant to subsection (c) for any year, the Commission 

shall conduct public hearings on the recommendations. All testimony before the Commission at 

a public hearing conducted under this paragraph shall be presented under oath. [The preceding 

sentence shall apply with respect to all public hearings conducted by the Defense Base Closure 

and Realignment Commission after November 30, 1993.] 

(2)(A) The Commission shall, by no later than July 1 of each year in which the Secretary 

transmits recommendations to it pursuant to subsection (c), transmit to the President a report 

containing the Commission's findings and conclusions based on a review and analysis of the 

recommendations made by the Secretary, together with the Commission's recommendations for 

closures and realignments of military installations inside the United States. 

(B) Subject to subparagraph (C), in making its recommendations, the Commission may 

make changes in any of the recommendations made by the Secretary if the Commission 

determines that the Secretary deviated substantially from the force-structure plan and final 

criteria referred to in subsection (c)(1) in making recommendations. 
D-7

(C) In the case of a change described in subparagraph (D) in the recommendations made 

by the Secretary, the Commission may make the change only if the Commission-- 

(i) makes the determination required by subparagraph (B); 

(ii) determines that the change is consistent with the force-structure plan and final 

criteria referred to in subsection (c)(1); 

(iii) publishes a notice of the proposed change in the Federal Register not less 

than 45 days before transmitting its recommendations to the President pursuant to 

paragraph (2); and 

(iv) conducts public hearings on the proposed change. 

(D) Subparagraph (C) shall apply to a change by the Commission in the Secretary's 

recommendations that would-- 

(i) add a military installation to the list of military installations recommended by 

the Secretary for closure; 

(ii) add a military installation to the list of military installations recommended by 

the Secretary for realignment; or 

(iii) increase the extent of a realignment of a particular military installation 

recommended by the Secretary. 

(E) In making recommendations under this paragraph, the Commission may not take into 

account for any purpose any advance conversion planning undertaken by an affected community 

with respect to the anticipated closure or realignment of a military installation. 

(3) The Commission shall explain and justify in its report submitted to the President 

pursuant to paragraph (2) any recommendation made by the Commission that is different from 

the recommendations made by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (c). The Commission shall 

transmit a copy of such report to the congressional defense committees on the same date on 

which it transmits its recommendations to the President under paragraph (2). 

(4) After July 1 of each year in which the Commission transmits recommendations to the 

President under this subsection, the Commission shall promptly provide, upon request, to any 

Member of Congress information used by the Commission in making its recommendations. 

(5) The Comptroller General of the United States shall-- 

(A) assist the Commission, to the extent requested, in the Commission's review 

and analysis of the recommendations made by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (C); 

and 

(B) by no later than April 15 of each year in which the Secretary makes such 

recommendations, transmit to the Congress and to the Commission a report containing a 

detailed analysis of the Secretary's recommendations and selection process. 

(e) REVIEW BY THE PRESIDENT.--(1) The President shall, by no later than July 15 of each 

year in which the Commission makes recommendations under subsection (d), transmit to the 

Commission and to the Congress a report containing the President's approval or disapproval of 

the Commission's recommendations. 

(2) If the President approves all the recommendations of the Commission, the President 

shall transmit a copy of such recommendations to the Congress, together with a certification of 

such approval. 

(3) If the President disapproves the recommendations of the Commission, in whole or in 

part, the President shall transmit to the Commission and the Congress the reasons for that 

disapproval. The Commission shall then transmit to the President, by no later than August 15 of 
D-8

the year concerned, a revised list of recommendations for the closure and realignment of military 

installations. 

(4) If the President approves all of the revised recommendations of the Commission 

transmitted to the President under paragraph (3), the President shall transmit a copy of such 

revised recommendations to the Congress, together with a certification of such approval. 

(5) If the President does not transmit to the Congress an approval and certification 

described in paragraph (2) or (4) by September 1 of any year in which the Commission has 

transmitted recommendations to the President under this part, the process by which military 

installations may be selected for closure or realignment under this part with respect to that year 

shall be terminated. 

SEC. 2904. CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT OF MILITARY INSTALLATIONS 

(a) IN GENERAL.--Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary shall-- 

(1) close all military installations recommended for closure by the Commission in 

each report transmitted to the Congress by the President pursuant to section 2903(e); 

(2) realign all military installations recommended for realignment by such 

Commission in each such report; 

(3) carry out the privatization in place of a military installation recommended for 

closure or realignment by the Commission in the 2005 report only if privatization in 

place is a method of closure or realignment of the military installation specified in the 

recommendations of the Commission in such report and is determined by the Commission to be the most cost-effective method of implementation of the recommendation; 

(4) initiate all such closures and realignments no later than two years after the 

date on which the President transmits a report to the Congress pursuant to section 2903(e) 

containing the recommendations for such closures or realignments; and 

(5) complete all such closures and realignments no later than the end of the sixyear period beginning on the date on which the President transmits the report pursuant to 

section 2903(e) containing the recommendations for such closures or realignments. 

(b) CONGRESSIONAL DISAPPROVAL.--(1) The Secretary may not carry out any closure or 

realignment recommended by the Commission in a report transmitted from the President 

pursuant to section 2903(e) if a joint resolution is enacted, in accordance with the provisions of 

section 2908: disapproving such recommendations of the Commission before the earlier of-- 

(A) the end of the 45-day period beginning on the date on which the President 

transmits such report; or 

(B) the adjournment of Congress sine die for the session during which such report 

is transmitted. 

(2) For purposes of paragraph (1) of this subsection and subsections (a) and (c) of section 

2908, the days on which either House of Congress is not in session because of adjournment of 

more than three days to a day certain shall be excluded in the computation of a period. 

SEC. 2905. IMPLEMENTATION

(a) IN GENERAL.--(1) In closing or realigning any military installation under this part, the 

Secretary may— 
D-9

(A) take such actions as may be necessary to close or realign any military installation, 

including the acquisition of such land, the construction of such replacement facilities, the 

performance of such activities, and the conduct of such advance planning and design as may be 

required to transfer functions from a military installation being closed or realigned to another 

military installation, and may use for such purpose funds in the Account or funds appropriated to 

the Department of Defense for use in planning and design, minor construction, or operation and 

maintenance; 

(B) provide-- 

(i) economic adjustment assistance to any community located near a 

military installation being closed or realigned, and 

(ii) community planning assistance to any community located near a 

military installation to which functions will be transferred as a result of the 

closure or realignment of a military installation, if the Secretary of Defense 

determines that the financial resources available to the community (by grant or 

otherwise) for such purposes are inadequate, and may use for such purposes funds 

in the Account or funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for economic 

adjustment assistance or community planning assistance; 

(C) carry out activities for the purposes of environmental restoration and 

mitigation at any such installation, and shall use for such purposes funds in the Account. 

[Amendments to this subsection took effect on December 5, 1991.] 

(D) provide outplacement assistance to civilian employees employed by the 

Department of Defense at military installations being closed or realigned, and may use 

for such purpose funds in the Account or funds appropriated to the Department of 

Defense for outplacement assistance to employees; and 

(E) reimburse other Federal agencies for actions performed at the request of the 

Secretary with respect to any such closure or realignment, and may use for such purpose 

funds in the Account or funds appropriated to the Department of Defense and available 

for such purpose. 

(2) In carrying out any closure or realignment under this part, the Secretary shall ensure 

that environmental restoration of any property made excess to the needs of the Department of 

Defense as a result of such closure or realignment be carried out as soon as possible with funds 

available for such purpose. 

(b) MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY.--(1) The Administrator of General 

Services shall delegate to the Secretary of Defense, with respect to excess and surplus real 

property, facilities, and personal property located at a military installation closed or realigned 

under this part-- 

(A) the authority of the Administrator to utilize excess property under subchapter 

II of chapter 5 of title 40, United States Code; 

(B) the authority of the Administrator to dispose of surplus property under 

subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 40, United States Code; 

(C) the authority to dispose of surplus property for public airports under sections 

47151 through 47153 of title 49, United States Code; and 

(D) the authority of the Administrator to determine the availability of excess or 

surplus real property for wildlife conservation purposes in accordance with the Act of 
D-10

May 19, 1948 (16 U.S.C. 667b). 

(2)(A) Subject to subparagraph (B) and paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6), the Secretary of 

Defense shall exercise the authority delegated to the Secretary pursuant to paragraph (1) in 

accordance with-- 

(i) all regulations governing the utilization of excess property and the disposal of 

surplus property under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949; 

and 

(ii) all regulations governing the conveyance and disposal of property under 

section 13(g) of the Surplus Property Act of 1944 (50 U.S.C. App. 1622(g)). 

(B) The Secretary may, with the concurrence of the Administrator of General Services-- 

(i) prescribe general policies and methods for utilizing excess property and 

disposing of surplus property pursuant to the authority delegated under paragraph (1); 

and 

(ii) issue regulations relating to such policies and methods, which shall supersede 

the regulations referred to in subparagraph (A) with respect to that authority. 

(C) The Secretary of Defense may transfer real property or facilities located at a military 

installation to be closed or realigned under this part, with or without reimbursement, to a military 

department or other entity (including a nonappropriated fund instrumentality) within the 

Department of Defense or the Coast Guard. 

(D) Before any action may be taken with respect to the disposal of any surplus real 

property or facility located at any military installation to be closed or realigned under this part, 

the Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Governor of the State and the heads of the local 

governments concerned for the purpose of considering any plan for the use of such property by 

the local community concerned. 

(E) If a military installation to be closed, realigned, or placed in an inactive status under 

this part includes a road used for public access through, into, or around the installation, the 

Secretary of Defense shall consult with the Governor of the State and the heads of the local 

governments concerned or the purpose of considering the continued availability of the road for 

public use after the installation is closed, realigned, or placed in an inactive status. 

(3)(A) Not later than 6 months after the date of approval of the closure or realignment of 

a military installation under this part, the Secretary, in consultation with the redevelopment 

authority with respect to the installation, shall-- 

(i) inventory the personal property located at the installation; and 

(ii) identify the items (or categories of items) of such personal property that the 

Secretary determines to be related to real property and anticipates will support the 

implementation of the redevelopment plan with respect to the installation. 

(B) If no redevelopment authority referred to in subparagraph (A) exists with respect to 

an installation, the Secretary shall consult with-- 

(i) the local government in whose jurisdiction the installation is wholly located; or 

(ii) a local government agency or State government agency designated for the 

purpose of such consultation by the chief executive officer of the State in which the 

installation is located. 

(C)(i) Except as provided in subparagraphs (E) and (F), the Secretary may not carry out 

any of the activities referred to in clause (ii) with respect to an installation referred to in that 

clause until the earlier of-- 
D-11

(I) one week after the date on which the redevelopment plan for the 

installation is submitted to the Secretary; 

(II) the date on which the redevelopment authority notifies the Secretary 

that it will not submit such a plan; 

(III) twenty-four months after the date of approval of the closure or 

realignment of the installation; or 

(IV) ninety days before the date of the closure or realignment of the 

installation. 

(ii) The activities referred to in clause (i) are activities relating to the closure or 

realignment of an installation to be closed or realigned under this part as follows: 

(I) The transfer from the installation of items of personal property at the 

installation identified in accordance with subparagraph (A). 

(II) The reduction in maintenance and repair of facilities or equipment located at 

the installation below the minimum levels required to support the use of such facilities or 

equipment for nonmilitary purposes. 

(D) Except as provided in paragraph (4), the Secretary may not transfer items of personal 

property located at an installation to be closed or realigned under this part to another installation, 

or dispose of such items, if such items are identified in the redevelopment plan for the 

installation as items essential to the reuse or redevelopment of the installation. In connection 

with the development of the redevelopment plan for the installation, the Secretary shall consult 

with the entity responsible for developing the redevelopment plan to identify the items of 

personal property located at the installation, if any, that the entity desires to be retained at the 

installation for reuse or redevelopment of the installation. 

(E) This paragraph shall not apply to any personal property located at an installation to be 

closed or realigned under this part if the property-- 

(i) is required for the operation of a unit, function, component, weapon, or 

weapons system at another installation; 

(ii) is uniquely military in character, and is likely to have no civilian use (other 

than use for its material content or as a source of commonly used components); 

(iii) is not required for the reutilization or redevelopment of the installation (as 

jointly determined by the Secretary and the redevelopment authority); 

(iv) is stored at the installation for purposes of distribution (including spare parts 

or stock items); or 

(v)(I) meets known requirements of an authorized program of another Federal 

department or agency for which expenditures for similar property would be necessary, 

and (II) is the subject of a written request by the head of the department or agency. 

(F) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (C)(i) and (D), the Secretary may carry out any 

activity referred to in subparagraph (C)(ii) or (D) if the Secretary determines that the carrying 

out of such activity is in the national security interest of the United States. 

(4)(A) The Secretary may transfer real property and personal property located at a 

military installation to be closed or realigned under this part to the redevelopment authority with 

respect to the installation for purposes of job generation on the installation. 

(B) With respect to military installations for which the date of approval of closure or 

realignment is after January 1, 2005, the Secretary shall seek to obtain consideration in 

connection with any transfer under this paragraph of property located at the installation in an 

amount equal to the fair market value of the property, as determined by the Secretary. The 
D-12

transfer of property of a military installation under subparagraph (A) may be without 

consideration if the redevelopment authority with respect to the installation— 

(i) agrees that the proceeds from any sale or lease of the property (or any portion 

thereof) received by the redevelopment authority during at least the first seven years after 

the date of the initial transfer of property under subparagraph (A) shall be used to support 

the economic redevelopment of, or related to, the installation; and 

(ii) executes the agreement for transfer of the property and accepts control of the 

property within a reasonable time after the date of the property disposal record of 

decision or finding of no significant impact under the National Environmental policy act 

of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). 

(C) For purposes of subparagraph (B), the use of proceeds from a sale or lease described 

in such subparagraph to pay for, or offset the costs of, public investment on or related to the 

installation for any of the following purposes shall be considered a use to support the economic 

redevelopment of, or related to, the installation: 

(i) Road construction. 

(ii) Transportation management facilities. 

(iii) Storm and sanitary sewer construction. 

(iv) Police and fire protection facilities and other public facilities. 

(v) Utility construction. 

(vi) Building rehabilitation. 

(vii) Historic property preservation. 

(viii) Pollution prevention equipment or facilities. 

(ix) Demolition. 

(x) Disposal of hazardous materials generated by demolition. 

(xi) Landscaping, grading, and other site or public improvements. 

(xii) Planning for or the marketing of the development and reuse of the 

installation. 

(D) The Secretary may recoup from a redevelopment authority such portion of the 

proceeds from a sale or lease described in subparagraph (B) as the Secretary determines 

appropriate if the redevelopment authority does not use the proceeds to support economic 

redevelopment of, or related to, the installation for the period specified in subparagraph (B). 

(E)(i) The Secretary may transfer real property at an installation approved for closure or 

realignment under this part (including property at an installation approved for realignment which 

will be retained by the Department of Defense or another Federal agency after realignment) to 

the redevelopment authority for the installation if the redevelopment authority agrees to lease, 

directly upon transfer, one or more portions of the property transferred under this subparagraph 

to the Secretary or to the head of another department or agency of the Federal Government. 

Subparagraph (B) shall apply to a transfer under this subparagraph. 

(ii) A lease under clause (i) shall be for a term of not to exceed 50 years, but may provide 

for options for renewal or extension of the term by the department or agency concerned. 

(iii) A lease under clause (i) may not require rental payments by the United States. 

(iv) A lease under clause (i) shall include a provision specifying that if the department or 

agency concerned ceases requiring the use of the leased property before the expiration of the 

term of the lease, the remainder of the lease term may be satisfied by the same or another 
D-13

department or agency of the Federal Government using the property for a use similar to the use 

under the lease. Exercise of the authority provided by this clause shall be made in consultation 

with the redevelopment authority concerned. 

(v) Notwithstanding clause (iii), if a lease under clause (i) involves a substantial portion 

of the installation, the department or agency concerned may obtain facility services for the leased 

property and common area maintenance from the redevelopment authority or the redevelopment 

authority's assignee as a provision of the lease. The facility services and common area 

maintenance shall be provided at a rate no higher than the rate charged to non-Federal tenants of 

the transferred property. Facility services and common area maintenance covered by the lease 

shall not include— 

(I) municipal services that a State or local government is required by law to 

provide to all landowners in its jurisdiction without direct charge; or 

(II) firefighting or security-guard functions. 

(F) The transfer of personal property under subparagraph (A) shall not be subject to the 

provisions of subchapters II and III of chapter 5 of title 40, United States Code, if the Secretary 

determines that the transfer of such property is necessary for the effective implementation of a 

redevelopment plan with respect to the installation at which such property is located. 

(G) The provisions of section 120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)) shall apply to any transfer of real 

property under this paragraph. 

(H)(i) In the case of an agreement for the transfer of property of a military installation 

under this paragraph that was entered into before April 21, 1999, the Secretary may modify the 

agreement, and in so doing compromise, waive, adjust, release, or reduce any right, title, claim, 

lien, or demand of the United States, if— 

(I) the Secretary determines that as a result of changed economic circumstances, a 

modification of the agreement is necessary; 

(II) the terms of the modification do not require the return of any payments that 

have been made to the Secretary; 

(III) the terms of the modification do not compromise, waive, adjust, release, or 

reduce an right, title, claim, lien, or demand of the United States with respect to in-kind 

consideration; and 

(IV) the cash consideration to which the United States is entitled under the 

modified agreement, when combined with the cash consideration to be received by the 

United States for the disposal of other real property assets on the installation, are as 

sufficient as they were under the original agreement to fund the reserve account 

established under section 204(b)(7)(C) of the Defense Authorization Amendments and 

Base Closure and Realignment Act, with the depreciated value of the investment made 

with commissary store funds or nonappropriated funds in property disposed of pursuant 

to the agreement being modified, in accordance with section 2906(d). 

(ii) When exercising the authority granted by clause (i), the Secretary may waive some or 

all future payments if, and to the extent that, the Secretary determines such waiver is necessary. 

(iii) With the exception of the requirement that the transfer be without consideration, the 

requirements of subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D) shall be applicable to any agreement modified 

pursuant to clause (i). 

(I) In the case of an agreement for the transfer of property of a military installation under 

this paragraph that was entered into during the period beginning on April 21, 1999, and ending 
D-14

on the date of enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, at the 

request of the redevelopment authority concerned, the Secretary shall modify the agreement to 

conform to all the requirements of subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D). Such a modification may 

include the compromise, waiver, adjustment, release, or reduction of any right, title, claim, lien, 

or demand of the Untied States under the agreement. 

(J) The Secretary may require any additional terms and conditions in connection with a 

transfer under this paragraph as such Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of 

the United States. 

(5)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), the Secretary shall take such 

actions as the Secretary determines necessary to ensure that final determinations under paragraph 

(1) regarding whether another department or agency of the Federal Government has identified a 

use for any portion of a military installation to be closed or realigned under this part, or will 

accept transfer of any portion of such installation, are made not later than 6 months after the date 

of approval of closure or realignment of that installation. 

(B) The Secretary may, in consultation with the redevelopment authority with respect to 

an installation, postpone making the final determinations referred to in subparagraph (A) with 

respect to the installation for such period as the Secretary determines appropriate if the Secretary 

determines that such postponement is in the best interests of the communities affected by the 

closure or realignment of the installation. 

(C)(i) Before acquiring non-Federal real property as the location for a new or 

replacement Federal facility of any type, the head of the Federal agency acquiring the property 

shall consult with the Secretary regarding the feasibility and cost advantages of using Federal 

property or facilities at a military installation closed or realigned or to be closed or realigned 

under this part as the location for the new or replacement facility. In considering the availability 

and suitability of a specific military installation, the Secretary and the head of the Federal agency 

involved shall obtain the concurrence of the redevelopment authority with respect to the 

installation and comply with the redevelopment plan for the installation. 

(ii) Not later than 30 days after acquiring non-Federal real property as the location for a 

new or replacement Federal facility, the head of the Federal agency acquiring the property shall 

submit to Congress a report containing the results of the consultation under clause (i) and the 

reasons why military installations referred to in such clause that are located within the area to be 

served by the new or replacement Federal facility or within a 200-mile radius of the new or 

replacement facility, whichever area is greater, were considered to be unsuitable or unavailable 

for the site of the new or replacement facility. 

(iii) This subparagraph shall apply during the period beginning on the date of the 

enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 and ending on July 

31, 2001. 

(6)(A) Except as provided in this paragraph, nothing in this section shall limit or 

otherwise affect the application of the provisions of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless 

Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11301 et seq.) to military installations closed under this part. For 

procedures relating to the use to assist the homeless of buildings and property at installations 

closed under this part after the date of the enactment of this sentence, see paragraph (7). 

(B)(i) Not later than the date on which the Secretary of Defense completes the 

determination under paragraph (5) of the transferability of any portion of an installation to be 

closed under this part, the Secretary shall— 
D-15

(I) complete any determinations or surveys necessary to determine whether any 

building or property referred to in clause (ii) is excess property, surplus property, or 

unutilized or underutilized property for the purpose of the information referred to in 

section 501(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 11411(a)); and 

(II) submit to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development information on 

any building or property that is so determined. 

(ii) The buildings and property referred to in clause (i) are any buildings or property 

located at an installation referred to in that clause for which no use is identified, or of which no 

Federal department or agency will accept transfer, pursuant to the determination of 

transferability referred to in that clause. 

(C) Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits 

information to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under subparagraph (B)(ii), the 

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall-- 

(i) identify the buildings and property described in such information that are 

suitable for use to assist the homeless; 

(ii) notify the Secretary of Defense of the buildings and property that are so 

identified; 

(iii) publish in the Federal Register a list of the buildings and property that are so 

identified, including with respect to each building or property the information referred to 

in section 501(c)(1)(B) of such Act; and 

(iv) make available with respect to each building and property the information 

referred to in section 501(c)(1)(C) of such Act in accordance with such section 

501(c)(1)(C). 

(D) Any buildings and property included in a list published under subparagraph (C)(iii) 

shall be treated as property available for application for use to assist the homeless under section 

501(d) of such Act. 

(E) The Secretary of Defense shall make available in accordance with section 501(f) of 

such Act any buildings or property referred to in subparagraph (D) for which-- 

(i) a written notice of an intent to use such buildings or property to assist the 

homeless is received by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in accordance with 

section 501(d)(2) of such Act; 

(ii) an application for use of such buildings or property for such purpose is 

submitted to the Secretary of Health and Human Services in accordance with section 

501(e)(2) of such Act; and 

(iii) the Secretary of Health and Human Services— 

(I) completes all actions on the application in accordance with section 

501(e)(3) of such Act; and 

(II) approves the application under section 501(e) of such Act. 

(F)(i) Subject to clause (ii), a redevelopment authority may express in writing an interest 

in using buildings and property referred to subparagraph (D), and buildings and property referred 

to in subparagraph (B)(ii) which have not been identified as suitable for use to assist the 

homeless under subparagraph (C), or use such buildings and property, in accordance with the 

redevelopment plan with respect to the installation at which such buildings and property are 

located as follows: 

(I) If no written notice of an intent to use such buildings or property to assist the 

homeless is received by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in accordance with 
D-16

section 501(d)(2) of such Act during the 60-day period beginning on the date of the 

publication of the buildings and property under subparagraph (C)(iii). 

(II) In the case of buildings and property for which such notice is so received, if 

no completed application for use of the buildings or property for such purpose is received 

by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in accordance with section 501(e)(2) of 

such Act during the 90-day period beginning on the date of the receipt of such notice. 

(III) In the case of buildings and property for which such application is so 

received, if the Secretary of Health and Human Services rejects the application under 

section 501(e) of such Act. 

(ii) Buildings and property shall be available only for the purpose of permitting a 

redevelopment authority to express in writing an interest in the use of such buildings and 

property, or to use such buildings and property, under clause (i) as follows: 

(I) In the case of buildings and property referred to in clause (i)(I), during the oneyear period beginning on the first day after the 60-day period referred to in that clause. 

(II) In the case of buildings and property referred to in clause (i)(II), during the 

one-year period beginning on the first day after the 90-day period referred to in that 

clause. 

(III) In the case of buildings and property referred to in clause (i)(III), during the 

one-year period beginning on the date of the rejection of the application referred to in 

that clause. 

(iii) A redevelopment authority shall express an interest in the use of buildings and 

property under this subparagraph by notifying the Secretary of Defense, in writing, of such an 

interest. 

(G)(i) Buildings and property available for a redevelopment authority under 

subparagraph (F) shall not be available for use to assist the homeless under section 501 of such 

Act while so available for a redevelopment authority. 

(ii) If a redevelopment authority does not express an interest in the use of buildings or 

property, or commence the use of buildings or property, under subparagraph (F) within the 

applicable time periods specified in clause (ii) of such subparagraph, such buildings or property 

shall be treated as property available for use to assist the homeless under section 501(a) of such 

Act. 

(7)(A) The disposal of buildings and property located at installations approved for 

closure or realignment under this part after October 25, 1994, shall be carried out in accordance 

with this paragraph rather than paragraph (6). 

(B)(i) Not later than the date on which the Secretary of Defense completes the final 

determinations referred to in paragraph (5) relating to the use or transferability of any portion of 

an installation covered by this paragraph, the Secretary shall-- 

(I) identify the buildings and property at the installation for which the Department 

of Defense has a use, for which another department or agency of the Federal Government 

has identified a use, or of which another department or agency will accept a transfer; 

(II) take such actions as are necessary to identify any building or property at the 

installation not identified under subclause (I) that is excess property or surplus property; 

(III) submit to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and to the 

redevelopment authority for the installation (or the chief executive officer of the State in 
D-17

which the installation is located if there is no redevelopment authority for the installation 

at the completion of the determination described in the stem of this sentence) information 

on any building or property that is identified under subclause (II); and 

(IV) publish in the Federal Register and in a newspaper of general circulation in 

the communities in the vicinity of the installation information on the buildings and 

property identified under subclause (II). 

(ii) Upon the recognition of a redevelopment authority for an installation covered by this 

paragraph, the Secretary of Defense shall publish in the Federal Register and in a newspaper of 

general circulation in the communities in the vicinity of the installation information on the 

redevelopment authority. 

(C)(i) State and local governments, representatives of the homeless, and other interested 

parties located in the communities in the vicinity of an installation covered by this paragraph 

shall submit to the redevelopment authority for the installation a notice of the interest, if any, of 

such governments, representatives, and parties in the buildings or property, or any portion 

thereof, at the installation that are identified under subparagraph (B)(i)(II). A notice of interest 

under this clause shall describe the need of the government, representative, or party concerned 

for the buildings or property covered by the notice. 

(ii) The redevelopment authority for an installation shall assist the governments, 

representatives, and parties referred to in clause (i) in evaluating buildings and property at the 

installation for purposes of this subparagraph. 

(iii) In providing assistance under clause (ii), a redevelopment authority shall— 

(I) consult with representatives of the homeless in the communities in the vicinity 

of the installation concerned; and 

(II) undertake outreach efforts to provide information on the buildings and 

property to representatives of the homeless, and to other persons or entities interested in 

assisting the homeless, in such communities. 

(iv) It is the sense of Congress that redevelopment authorities should begin to conduct 

outreach efforts under clause (iii)(II) with respect to an installation as soon as is practicable after 

the date of approval of closure or realignment of the installation. 

(D)(i) State and local governments, representatives of the homeless, and other interested 

parties shall submit a notice of interest to a redevelopment authority under subparagraph (C) not 

later than the date specified for such notice by the redevelopment authority. 

(ii) The date specified under clause (i) shall be- 

(I) in the case of an installation for which a redevelopment authority has been 

recognized as of the date of the completion of the determinations referred to in paragraph 

(5), not earlier than 3 months and not later than 6 months after the date of publication of 

such determination in a newspaper of general circulation in the communities in the 

vicinity of the installation under subparagraph (B)(i)(IV); and 

(II) in the case of an installation for which a redevelopment authority is not 

recognized as of such date, not earlier than 3 months and not later than 6 months after the 

date of the recognition of a redevelopment authority for the installation. 

(iii) Upon specifying a date for an installation under this subparagraph, the 

redevelopment authority for the installation shall-- 

(I) publish the date specified in a newspaper of general circulation in the 

communities in the vicinity of the installation concerned; and 

(II) notify the Secretary of Defense of the date. 
D-18

(E)(i) In submitting to a redevelopment authority under subparagraph (C) a notice of 

interest in the use of buildings or property at an installation to assist the homeless, a 

representative of the homeless shall submit the following: 

(I) A description of the homeless assistance program that the representative 

proposes to carry out at the installation. 

(II) An assessment of the need for the program. 

(III) A description of the extent to which the program is or will be coordinated 

with other homeless assistance programs in the communities in the vicinity of the 

installation. 

(IV) A description of the buildings and property at the installation that are 

necessary in order to carry out the program. 

(V) A description of the financial plan, the organization, and the organizational 

capacity of the representative to carry out the program. 

(VI) An assessment of the time required in order to commence carrying out the 

program. 

(ii) A redevelopment authority may not release to the public any information submitted to 

the redevelopment authority under clause (i)(V) without the consent of the representative of the 

homeless concerned unless such release is authorized under Federal law and under the law of the 

State and communities in which the installation concerned is located. 

(F)(i) The redevelopment authority for each installation covered by this paragraph shall 

prepare a redevelopment plan for the installation. The redevelopment authority shall, in 

preparing the plan, consider the interests in the use to assist the homeless of the buildings and 

property at the installation that are expressed in the notices submitted to the redevelopment 

authority under subparagraph (C). 

(ii)(I) In connection with a redevelopment plan for an installation, a redevelopment 

authority and representatives of the homeless shall prepare legally binding agreements that 

provide for the use to assist the homeless of buildings and property, resources, and assistance on 

or off the installation. The implementation of such agreements shall be contingent upon the 

decision regarding the disposal of the buildings and property covered by the agreements by the 

Secretary of Defense under subparagraph (K) or (L). 

(II) Agreements under this clause shall provide for the reversion to the redevelopment 

authority concerned, or to such other entity or entities as the agreements shall provide, of 

buildings and property that are made available under this paragraph for use to assist the homeless 

in the event that such buildings and property cease being used for that purpose. 

(iii) A redevelopment authority shall provide opportunity for public comment on a 

redevelopment plan before submission of the plan to the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary 

of Housing and Urban Development under subparagraph (G). 

(iv) A redevelopment authority shall complete preparation of a redevelopment plan for an 

installation and submit the plan under subparagraph (G) not later than 9 months after the date 

specified by the redevelopment authority for the installation under subparagraph (D). 

(G)(i) Upon completion of a redevelopment plan under subparagraph (F), a 

redevelopment authority shall submit an application containing the plan to the Secretary of 

Defense and to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. 

(ii) A redevelopment authority shall include in an application under clause (i) the 

following: 
D-19

(I) A copy of the redevelopment plan, including a summary of any public 

comments on the plan received by the redevelopment authority under subparagraph 

(F)(iii). 

(II) A copy of each notice of interest of use of buildings and property to assist the 

homeless that was submitted to the redevelopment authority under subparagraph (C), 

together with a description of the manner, if any, in which the plan addresses the interest 

expressed in each such notice and, if the plan does not address such an interest, an 

explanation why the plan does not address the interest. 

(III) A summary of the outreach undertaken by the redevelopment authority under 

subparagraph (C)(iii)(II) in preparing the plan. 

(IV) A statement identifying the representatives of the homeless and the homeless 

assistance planning boards, if any, with which the redevelopment authority consulted in 

preparing the plan, and the results of such consultations. 

(V) An assessment of the manner in which the redevelopment plan balances the 

expressed needs of the homeless and the need of the communities in the vicinity of the 

installation for economic redevelopment and other development. 

(VI) Copies of the agreements that the redevelopment authority proposes to enter 

into under subparagraph (F)(ii). 

(H)(i) Not later than 60 days after receiving a redevelopment plan under subparagraph 

(G), the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall complete a review of the plan. The 

purpose of the review is to determine whether the plan, with respect to the expressed interest and 

requests of representatives of the homeless-- 

(I) takes into consideration the size and nature of the homeless population in the 

communities in the vicinity of the installation, the availability of existing services in such 

communities to meet the needs of the homeless in such communities, and the suitability 

of the buildings and property covered by the plan for the use and needs of the homeless in 

such communities; 

(II) takes into consideration any economic impact of the homeless assistance 

under the plan on the communities in the vicinity of the installation; 

(III) balances in an appropriate manner the needs of the communities in the 

vicinity of the installation for economic redevelopment and other development with the 

needs of the homeless in such communities; 

(IV) was developed in consultation with representatives of the homeless and the 

homeless assistance planning boards, if any, in the communities in the vicinity of the 

installation; and 

(V) specifies the manner in which buildings and property, resources, and 

assistance on or off the installation will be made available for homeless assistance 

purposes. 

(ii) It is the sense of Congress that the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 

shall, in completing the review of a plan under this subparagraph, take into consideration and be 

receptive to the predominant views on the plan of the communities in the vicinity of the 

installation covered by the plan. 

(iii) The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may engage in negotiations and 

consultations with a redevelopment authority before or during the course of a review under 
D-20

clause (i) with a view toward resolving any preliminary determination of the Secretary that a 

redevelopment plan does not meet a requirement set forth in that clause. The redevelopment 

authority may modify the redevelopment plan as a result of such negotiations and consultations. 

(iv) Upon completion of a review of a redevelopment plan under clause (i), the Secretary 

of Housing and Urban Development shall notify the Secretary of Defense and the redevelopment 

authority concerned of the determination of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 

under that clause. 

(v) If the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development determines as a result of such a 

review that a redevelopment plan does not meet the requirements set forth in clause (i), a notice 

under clause (iv) shall include-- 

(I) an explanation of that determination; and 

(II) a statement of the actions that the redevelopment authority must undertake in 

order to address that determination. 

(I)(i) Upon receipt of a notice under subparagraph (H)(iv) of a determination that a 

redevelopment plan does not meet a requirement set forth in subparagraph (H)(i), a 

redevelopment authority shall have the opportunity to-- 

(I) revise the plan in order to address the determination; and 

(II) submit the revised plan to the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

Housing and Urban Development. 

(ii) A redevelopment authority shall submit a revised plan under this subparagraph to 

such Secretaries, if at all, not later than 90 days after the date on which the redevelopment 

authority receives the notice referred to in clause (i). 

(J)(i) Not later than 30 days after receiving a revised redevelopment plan under 

subparagraph (I), the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall review the revised plan 

and determine if the plan meets the requirements set forth in subparagraph (H)(i). 

(ii) The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall notify the Secretary of 

Defense and the redevelopment authority concerned of the determination of the Secretary of 

Housing and Urban Development under this subparagraph. 

(K)(i) Upon receipt of a notice under subparagraph (H)(iv) or (J)(ii) of the determination 

of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development that a redevelopment plan for an 

installation meets the requirements set forth in subparagraph (H)(i), the Secretary of Defense 

shall dispose of the buildings and property at the installation. 

(ii) For purposes of carrying out an environmental assessment of the closure or 

realignment of an installation, the Secretary of Defense shall treat the redevelopment plan for the 

installation (including the aspects of the plan providing for disposal to State or local 

governments, representatives of the homeless, and other interested parties) as part of the 

proposed Federal action for the installation. 

(iii) The Secretary of Defense shall dispose of buildings and property under clause (i) in 

accordance with the record of decision or other decision document prepared by the Secretary in 

accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). In 

preparing the record of decision or other decision document, the Secretary shall give substantial 

deference to the redevelopment plan concerned. 

(iv) The disposal under clause (i) of buildings and property to assist the homeless shall be 

without consideration. 

(v) In the case of a request for a conveyance under clause (i) of buildings and property 

for public benefit under section 550 of title 40, United States Code, or sections 47151 through 
D-21

47153 of title 49, United States Code, the sponsoring Federal agency shall use the eligibility 

criteria set forth in such section or such subchapter (as the case may be) to determine the 

eligibility of the applicant and use proposed in the request for the public benefit conveyance. The 

determination of such eligibility should be made before submission of the redevelopment plan 

concerned under subparagraph (G). 

(L)(i) If the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development determines under 

subparagraph (J) that a revised redevelopment plan for an installation does not meet the 

requirements set forth in subparagraph (H)(i), or if no revised plan is so submitted, that Secretary 

shall-- 

(I) review the original redevelopment plan submitted to that Secretary under 

subparagraph (G), including the notice or notices of representatives of the homeless 

referred to in clause (ii)(II) of that subparagraph; 

(II) consult with the representatives referred to in subclause (I), if any, for 

purposes of evaluating the continuing interest of such representatives in the use of 

buildings or property at the installation to assist the homeless; 

(III) request that each such representative submit to that Secretary the items 

described in clause (ii); and 

(IV) based on the actions of that Secretary under subclauses (I) and (II), and on 

any information obtained by that Secretary as a result of such actions, indicate to the 

Secretary of Defense the buildings and property at the installation that meet the 

requirements set forth in subparagraph (H)(i). 

(ii) The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development may request under clause (i)(III) 

that a representative of the homeless submit to that Secretary the following: 

(I) A description of the program of such representative to assist the homeless. 

(II) A description of the manner in which the buildings and property that the 

representative proposes to use for such purpose will assist the homeless. 

(III) Such information as that Secretary requires in order to determine the 

financial capacity of the representative to carry out the program and to ensure that the 

program will be carried out in compliance with Federal environmental law and Federal 

law against discrimination. 

(IV) A certification that police services, fire protection services, and water and 

sewer services available in the communities in the vicinity of the installation concerned 

are adequate for the program. 

(iii) Not later than 90 days after the date of the receipt of a revised plan for an installation 

under subparagraph (J), the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall-- 

(I) notify the Secretary of Defense and the redevelopment authority concerned of 

the buildings and property at an installation under clause (i)(IV) that the Secretary of 

Housing and Urban Development determines are suitable for use to assist the homeless; 

and 

(II) notify the Secretary of Defense of the extent to which the revised plan meets 

the criteria set forth in subparagraph (H)(i). 

(iv)(I) Upon notice from the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development with respect 

to an installation under clause (iii), the Secretary of Defense shall dispose of buildings and 

property at the installation in consultation with the Secretary of Housing and Urban 

Development and the redevelopment authority concerned. 
D-22

(II) For purposes of carrying out an environmental assessment of the closure or 

realignment of an installation, the Secretary of Defense shall treat the redevelopment plan 

submitted by the redevelopment authority for the installation (including the aspects of the plan 

providing for disposal to State or local governments, representatives of the homeless, and other 

interested parties) as part of the proposed Federal action for the installation. The Secretary of 

Defense shall incorporate the notification of the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 

under clause (iii)(I) as part of the proposed Federal action for the installation only to the extent, 

if any, that the Secretary of Defense considers such incorporation to be appropriate and 

consistent with the best and highest use of the installation as a whole, taking into consideration 

the redevelopment plan submitted by the redevelopment authority. 

(III) The Secretary of Defense shall dispose of buildings and property under subclause (I) 

in accordance with the record of decision or other decision document prepared by the Secretary 

in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). In 

preparing the record of decision or other decision document, the Secretary shall give deference 

to the redevelopment plan submitted by the redevelopment authority for the installation. 

(IV) The disposal under subclause (I) of buildings and property to assist the homeless 

shall be without consideration. 

(V) In the case of a request for a conveyance under subclause (I) of buildings and 

property for public benefit under section 550 of title 40, United States Code, or sections 47151 

through 47153 of title 49, United States Code, the sponsoring Federal agency shall use the 

eligibility criteria set forth in such section or such subchapter (as the case may be) to determine 

the eligibility of the applicant and use proposed in the request for the public benefit conveyance. 

The determination of such eligibility should be made before submission of the redevelopment 

plan concerned under subparagraph (G). 

(M)(i) In the event of the disposal of buildings and property of an installation pursuant to 

subparagraph (K) or (L), the redevelopment authority for the installation shall be responsible for 

the implementation of and compliance with agreements under the redevelopment plan described 

in that subparagraph for the installation. 

(ii) If a building or property reverts to a redevelopment authority under such an 

agreement, the redevelopment authority shall take appropriate actions to secure, to the maximum 

extent practicable, the utilization of the building or property by other homeless representatives to 

assist the homeless. A redevelopment authority may not be required to utilize the building or 

property to assist the homeless. 

(N) The Secretary of Defense may postpone or extend any deadline provided for under 

this paragraph in the case of an installation covered by this paragraph for such period as the 

Secretary considers appropriate if the Secretary determines that such postponement is in the 

interests of the communities affected by the closure or realignment of the installation. The 

Secretary shall make such determinations in consultation with the redevelopment authority 

concerned and, in the case of deadlines provided for under this paragraph with respect to the 

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in consultation with the Secretary of Housing and 

Urban Development. 

(O) For purposes of this paragraph, the term "communities in the vicinity of the 

installation", in the case of an installation, means the communities that constitute the political 

jurisdictions (other than the State in which the installation is located) that comprise the 

redevelopment authority for the installation. 
D-23

(P) For purposes of this paragraph, the term "other interested parties", in the case of an 

installation, includes any parties eligible for the conveyance of property of the installation under 

section 550 of title 40, United States Code, or sections 47151 through 47153 of title 49, United 

States Code, whether or not the parties assist the homeless. 

(8)(A) Subject to subparagraph (C), the Secretary may enter into agreements (including 

contracts, cooperative agreements, or other arrangements for reimbursement) with local 

governments for the provision of police or security services, fire protection services, airfield 

operation services, or other community services by such governments at military installations to 

be closed under this part, or at facilities not yet transferred or otherwise disposed of in the case 

of installations closed under this part, if the Secretary determines that the provision of such 

services under such agreements is in the best interests of the Department of Defense. 

(B) The Secretary may exercise the authority provided under this paragraph without 

regard to the provisions of chapter 146 of title 10, United States Code. 

(C) The Secretary may not exercise the authority under subparagraph (A) with respect to 

an installation earlier than 180 days before the date on which the installation is to be closed. 

(D) The Secretary shall include in a contract for services entered into with a local 

government under this paragraph a clause that requires the use of professionals to furnish the 

services to the extent that professionals are available in the area under the jurisdiction of such 

government. 

(c) APPLICABILITY OF NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1969.--(1) The 

provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) shall not 

apply to the actions of the President, the Commission, and, except as provided in paragraph (2), 

the Department of Defense in carrying out this part. 

(2)(A) The provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 shall apply to 

actions of the Department of Defense under this part (i) during the process of property disposal, 

and (ii) during the process of relocating functions from a military installation being closed or 

realigned to another military installation after the receiving installation has been selected but 

before the functions are relocated. 

(B) In applying the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to the 

processes referred to in subparagraph (A), the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of the 

military departments concerned shall not have to consider-- 

(i) the need for closing or realigning the military installation which has been 

recommended for closure or realignment by the Commission; 

(ii) the need for transferring functions to any military installation which has been 

selected as the receiving installation; or 

(iii) military installations alternative to those recommended or selected. 

(3) A civil action for judicial review, with respect to any requirement of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to the extent such Act is applicable under paragraph (2), of 

any act or failure to act by the Department of Defense during the closing, realigning, or 

relocating of functions referred to in clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (2)(A), may not be brought 

more than 60 days after the date of such act or failure to act. 

(d) WAIVER.--The Secretary of Defense may close or realign military installations under 

this part without regard to-- 
D-24

(1) any provision of law restricting the use of funds for closing or realigning 

military installations included in any appropriations or authorization Act; and 

(2) sections 2662 and 2687 of title 10, United States Code. 

(e) TRANSFER AUTHORITY IN CONNECTION WITH PAYMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL 

REMEDIATION COSTS.--(1)(A) Subject to paragraph (2) of this subsection and section 120(h) of 

the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 

U.S.C. 9620(h)), the Secretary may enter into an agreement to transfer by deed real property or 

facilities referred to in subparagraph (B) with any person who agrees to perform all 

environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance activities that are 

required for the property or facilities under Federal and State laws, administrative decisions, 

agreements (including schedules and milestones), and concurrences. 

(B) The real property and facilities referred to in subparagraph (A) are the real property 

and facilities located at an installation closed or to be closed, or realigned or to be realigned, 

under this part that are available exclusively for the use, or expression of an interest in a use, of a 

redevelopment authority under subsection (b)(6)(F) during the period provided for that use, or 

expression of interest in use, under that subsection. The real property and facilities referred to 

in subparagraph (A) are also the real property and facilities located at an installation approved 

for closure or realignment under this part after 2001 that are available for purposes other than to 

assist the homeless. 

(C) The Secretary may require any additional terms and conditions in connection with an 

agreement authorized by subparagraph (A) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the 

interests of the United States. 

(2) A transfer of real property or facilities may be made under paragraph (1) only if the 

Secretary certifies to Congress that-- 

(A) the costs of all environmental restoration, waste management, and 

environmental compliance activities otherwise to be paid by the Secretary with respect to 

the property or facilities are equal to or greater than the fair market value of the property 

or facilities to be transferred, as determined by the Secretary; or 

(B) if such costs are lower than the fair market value of the property or facilities, 

the recipient of the property or facilities agrees to pay the difference between the fair 

market value and such costs. 

 (3) In the case of property or facilities covered by a certification under paragraph (2)(A), 

the Secretary may pay the recipient of such property or facilities an amount equal to the lesser 

of— 

 (A) the amount by which the costs incurred by the recipient of such property or 

facilities for all environmental restoration, waste, management, and environmental 

compliance activities with respect to such property or facilities exceed the fair market 

value of such property or facilities as specified in such certification; or 

 (B) the amount by which the costs (as determined by the Secretary) that would 

otherwise have been incurred by the Secretary for such restoration, management, and 

activities with respect to such property or facilities exceed the fair market value of such 

property or facilities as so specified 

(4) As part of an agreement under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall disclose to the 

person to whom the property or facilities will be transferred any information of the Secretary 

regarding the environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance 
D-25

activities described in paragraph (1) that relate to the property or facilities. The Secretary shall 

provide such information before entering into the agreement. 

(5) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to modify, alter, or amend the 

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 

9601 et seq.) or the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.). 

(6) Section 330 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public 

Law 102-484; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) shall not apply to any transfer under this subsection to 

persons or entities described in subsection (a)(2) of such section 330, except in the case of 

releases or threatened releases not disclosed pursuant to paragraph (4). 

SEC. 2906. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 1990

(a) IN GENERAL.--(1) There is hereby established on the books of the Treasury an account 

to be known as the "Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990" which shall be 

administered by the Secretary as a single account. 

(2) There shall be deposited into the Account-- 

(A) funds authorized for and appropriated to the Account; 

(B) any funds that the Secretary may, subject to approval in an appropriation Act, 

transfer to the Account from funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for any 

purpose, except that such funds may be transferred only after the date on which the 

Secretary transmits written notice of, and justification for, such transfer to the 

congressional defense committees; 

(C) except as provided in subsection (d), proceeds received from the lease, 

transfer, or disposal of any property at a military installation closed or realigned under 

this part the date of approval of closure or realignment of which is before January 1, 

2005; and 

(D) proceeds received after September 30, 1995, from the lease, transfer, or 

disposal of any property at a military installation closed or realigned under title II of the 

Defense Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and Realignment Act (Public Law 

100-526; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note). 

(3) The Account shall be closed at the time and in the manner provided for appropriation 

accounts under section 1555 of title 31, United States Code. Unobligated funds which remain in 

the Account upon closure shall be held by the Secretary of the Treasury until transferred by law 

after the congressional defense committees receive the final report transmitted under subsection 

(c)(2). 

(b) USE OF FUNDS.--(1) The Secretary may use the funds in the Account only for the 

purposes described in section 2905 with respect to military installations the date of approval of 

closure or realignment of which is before January 1, 2005, or, after September 30, 1995, for 

environmental restoration and property management and disposal at installations closed or 

realigned under title II of the Defense Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and 

Realignment Act (Public Law 100-526; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note). After July 13, 2001, the Account 

shall be the sole source of Federal funds for environmental restoration, property management, 

and other caretaker costs associated with any real property at military installations closed or 

realigned under this part or such title II. 
D-26

(2) When a decision is made to use funds in the Account to carry out a construction 

project under section 2905(a) and the cost of the project will exceed the maximum amount 

authorized by law for a minor military construction project, the Secretary shall notify in writing 

the congressional defense committees of the nature of, and justification for, the project and the 

amount of expenditures for such project. Any such construction project may be carried out 

without regard to section 2802(a) of title 10, United States Code. 

(c) REPORTS.--(1)(A) No later than 60 days after the end of each fiscal year in which the 

Secretary carries out activities under this part, the Secretary shall transmit a report to the 

congressional defense committees of the amount and nature of the deposits into, and the 

expenditures from, the Account during such fiscal year and of the amount and nature of other 

expenditures made pursuant to section 2905(a) during such fiscal year. 

(B) The report for a fiscal year shall include the following: 

(i) The obligations and expenditures from the Account during the fiscal year, 

identified by subaccount, for each military department and Defense Agency. 

(ii) The fiscal year in which appropriations for such expenditures were made and 

the fiscal year in which funds were obligated for such expenditures. 

(iii) Each military construction project for which such obligations and 

expenditures were made, identified by installation and project title. 

(iv) A description and explanation of the extent, if any, to which expenditures for 

military construction projects for the fiscal year differed from proposals for projects and 

funding levels that were included in the justification transmitted to Congress under 

section 2907(1), or otherwise, for the funding proposals for the Account for such fiscal 

year, including an explanation of-- 

(I) any failure to carry out military construction projects that were so 

proposed; and 

(II) any expenditures for military construction projects that were not so 

proposed. 

(2) No later than 60 days after the termination of the authority of the Secretary to carry 

out a closure or realignment under this part with respect to military installations the date of 

approval of closure or realignment of which is before January 1, 2005, and no later than 60 days 

after the closure of the Account under subsection (a)(3), the Secretary shall transmit to the 

congressional defense committees a report containing an accounting of-- 

(A) all the funds deposited into and expended from the Account or otherwise 

expended under this part with respect to such installations; and 

(B) any amount remaining in the Account. 

(d) DISPOSAL OR TRANSFER OF COMMISSARY STORES AND PROPERTY PURCHASED WITH 

NONAPPROPRIATED FUNDS.--(1) If any real property or facility acquired, constructed, or 

improved (in whole or in part) with commissary store funds or nonappropriated funds is 

transferred or disposed of in connection with the closure or realignment of a military installation 

under this part the date of approval of closure or realignment of which is before January 1, 2005, 

a portion of the proceeds of the transfer or other disposal of property on that installation shall be 

deposited in the reserve account established under section 204(b)(7)(C) of the Defense 

Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and Realignment Act (10 U.S.C. 2687 note). 
D-27

(2) The amount so deposited shall be equal to the depreciated value of the investment 

made with such funds in the acquisition, construction, or improvement of that particular real 

property or facility. The depreciated value of the investment shall be computed in accordance 

with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense. 

(3) The Secretary may use amounts in the account (in such an aggregate amount as is 

provided in advance in appropriation Acts) for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, and 

improving-- 

(A) commissary stores; and 

(B) real property and facilities for nonappropriated fund instrumentalities. 

(4) As used in this subsection: 

(A) The term "commissary store funds" means funds received from the 

adjustment of, or surcharge on, selling prices at commissary stores fixed under section 

2685 of title 10, United States Code. 

(B) The term "nonappropriated funds" means funds received from a 

nonappropriated fund instrumentality. 

(C) The term "nonappropriated fund instrumentality" means an instrumentality of 

the United States under the jurisdiction of the Armed Forces (including the Army and Air 

Force Exchange Service, the Navy Resale and Services Support Office, and the Marine 

Corps exchanges) which is conducted for the comfort, pleasure, contentment, or physical 

or mental improvement of members of the Armed Forces. 

(e) ACCOUNT EXCLUSIVE SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION 

PROJECTS.—Except as provided in section 2906A(e) with respect to funds in the Department of 

Defense Base Closure Account 2005 under section 2906A and except for funds deposited into 

the Account under subsection (a), funds appropriated to the Department of Defense may not be 

used for purposes described in section 2905 (a)(1)(C). The prohibition in this subsection shall 

expire upon the closure of the Account under subsection (a)(3). 

SEC. 2906A. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE ACCOUNT 2005. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—(1) If the Secretary makes the certifications required under section 

2912(b), there shall be established on the books of the Treasury an account to be known as the 

"Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005" (in this section referred to as the 

"Account"). The Account shall be administered by the Secretary as a single account. 

(2) There shall be deposited into the Account— 

(A) funds authorized for and appropriated to the Account; 

(B) any funds that the Secretary may, subject to approval in an appropriation Act, 

transfer to the Account from funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for any 

purpose, except that such funds may be transferred only after the date on which the 

Secretary transmits written notice of, and justification for, such transfer to the congressional defense committees; and 

(C) except as provided in subsection (d), proceeds received from the lease, 

transfer, or disposal of any property at a military installation that is closed or realigned 

under this part pursuant to a closure or realignment the date of approval of which is after 

January 1, 2005. 
D-28

(3) The Account shall be closed at the time and in the manner provided for appropriation 

accounts under section 1555 of title 31, United States Code. Unobligated funds which remain in 

the Account upon closure shall be held by the Secretary of the Treasury until transferred by law 

after the congressional defense committees receive the final report transmitted under subsection 

(c)(2), 

(b) USE OF FUNDS.—(1) The Secretary may use the funds in the Account only for the 

purposes described in section 2905 with respect to military installations the date of approval of 

closure or realignment of which is after January 1, 2005. 

(2) When a decision is made to use funds in the Account to carry out a construction 

project under section 2905(a) and the cost of the project will exceed the maximum amount authorized by law for a minor military construction project, the Secretary shall notify in writing the 

congressional defense committees of the nature of, and justification for, the project and the 

amount of expenditures for’ such project. Any such construction project may be carried out 

without regard to section 2802(a) of title 10, United States Code. 

(c) REPORTS.—(1)(A) No later than 60 days after the end of each fiscal year in which the 

Secretary carries out activities under this part using amounts in the Account, the Secretary shall 

transmit a report to the congressional defense committees of the amount and nature of the 

deposits into, and the expenditures from, the Account during such fiscal year and of the amount 

and nature of other expenditures made pursuant to section 2905(a) during such fiscal year. 

(B) The report for a fiscal year shall include the following: 

(i) The obligations and expenditures from the Account during the fiscal year, 

identified by subaccount, for each military department and Defense Agency. 

(ii) The fiscal year in which appropriations for such expenditures were made and 

the fiscal year in which finds were obligated for such expenditures. 

(iii) Each military construction project for which such obligations and 

expenditures were made, identified by installation and project title. 

(iv) A description and explanation of the extent, if any, to which expenditures for 

military construction projects for the fiscal year differed from proposals for projects and 

funding levels that were included in the justification transmitted to Congress under 

section 2907(1), or otherwise, for the funding proposals for the Account for such fiscal 

year, including an explanation of— 

(I) any failure to carry out military construction projects that were so 

proposed; and 

(II) any expenditures for military construction projects that were not so 

proposed. 

(2) No later than 60 days after the termination of the authority of the Secretary to carry 

out a closure or realignment under this part with respect to military installations the date of 

approval of closure or realignment of which is after January 1, 2005, and no later than 60 days 

after the closure of the Account under subsection (a)(3), the Secretary shall transmit to the 

congressional defense committees a report containing an accounting of— 

(A) all the funds deposited into and expended from the Account or otherwise 

expended under this part with respect to such installations; and 

(B) any amount remaining in the Account. 
D-29

(d) DISPOSAL OR TRANSFER OF COMMISSARY STORES AND PROPERTY PURCHASED WITH 

NONAPPROPRIATED FUNDS.—(1) If any real property or facility acquired, constructed, or 

improved (in whole or in part) with commissary store funds or nonappropriated funds is 

transferred or disposed of in connection with the closure or realignment of a military installation 

under this part the date of approval of closure or realignment of which is after January 1, 2005, a 

portion of the proceeds of the transfer or other disposal of property on that installation shall be 

deposited in the reserve account established under section 204(b)(7)(C) of the Defense 

Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and Realignment Act (10 U.S.C. 2687 note). 

(2) The amount so deposited shall be equal to the depreciated value of the investment 

made with such funds in the acquisition, construction, or improvement of that particular real 

property or facility. The depreciated value of the investment shall be computed in accordance 

with regulations prescribed by the Secretary. 

(3) The Secretary may use amounts in the reserve account, without further appropriation, 

for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, and improving— 

(A) commissary stores; and 

(B) real property and facilities for nonappropriated fund instrumentalities. 

(4) In this subsection, the terms commissary store funds", "nonappropriated funds", and 

"nonappropriated fund instrumentality" shall have the meaning given those terms in section 

2906(d)(4). 

(e) ACCOUNT EXCLUSIVE SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION 

PROJECTS.—Except as provided in section 2906(e) with respect to funds in the Department of 

Defense Base Closure Account 1990 under section 2906 and except for funds deposited into the 

Account under subsection (a), funds appropriated to the Department of Defense may not he used 

for purposes described in section 2905(a)(1)(C). The prohibition in this subsection shall expire 

upon the closure of the Account under subsection (a)(3). 

SEC. 2907. REPORTS 

As part of the budget request for fiscal year 1993 and for each fiscal year thereafter for 

the Department of Defense, the Secretary shall transmit to the congressional defense committees 

of Congress-- 

(1) a schedule of the closure and realignment actions to be carried out under this 

part in the fiscal year for which the request is made and an estimate of the total 

expenditures required and cost savings to be achieved by each such closure and 

realignment and of the time period in which these savings are to be achieved in each 

case, together with the Secretary's assessment of the environmental effects of such 

actions; and 

(2) a description of the military installations, including those under construction 

and those planned for construction, to which functions are to be transferred as a result of 

such closures and realignments, together with the Secretary's assessment of the 

environmental effects of such transfers. 
D-30

SEC. 2908. CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION OF COMMISSION REPORT

(a) TERMS OF THE RESOLUTION.--For purposes of section 2904(b), the term "joint 

resolution" means only a joint resolution which is introduced within the 10-day period beginning 

on the date on which the President transmits the report to the Congress under section 2903(e), 

and-- 

(1) which does not have a preamble; 

(2) the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: "That Congress 

disapproves the recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 

Commission as submitted by the President on ", the blank space being filled in 

with the appropriate date; and 

(3) the title of which is as follows: "Joint resolution disapproving the 

recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission.". 

(b) REFERRAL.--A resolution described in subsection (a) that is introduced in the House 

of Representatives shall be referred to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of 

Representatives. A resolution described in subsection (a) introduced in the Senate shall be 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate. 

(c) DISCHARGE.--If the committee to which a resolution described in subsection (a) is 

referred has not reported such a resolution (or an identical resolution) by the end of the 20-day 

period beginning on the date on which the President transmits the report to the Congress under 

section 2903(e), such committee shall be, at the end of such period, discharged from further 

consideration of such resolution, and such resolution shall be placed on the appropriate calendar 

of the House involved. 

(d) CONSIDERATION.--(1) On or after the third day after the date on which the committee 

to which such a resolution is referred has reported, or has been discharged (under subsection (c)) 

from further consideration of, such a resolution, it is in order (even though a previous motion to 

the same effect has been disagreed to) for any Member of the respective House to move to 

proceed to the consideration of the resolution. A member may make the motion only on the day 

after the calendar day on which the Member announces to the House concerned the Member's 

intention to make the motion, except that, in the case of the House of Representatives, the motion 

may be made without such prior announcement if the motion is made by direction of the 

committee to which the resolution was referred. The motion is highly privileged in the House of 

Representatives and is privileged in the Senate and is not debatable. The motion is not subject to 

amendment, or to a motion to postpone, or to a motion to proceed to the consideration of other 

business. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the motion is agreed to or disagreed to shall 

not be in order. If a motion to proceed to the consideration of the resolution is agreed to, the 

respective House shall immediately proceed to consideration of the joint resolution without 

intervening motion, order, or other business, and the resolution shall remain the unfinished 

business of the respective House until disposed of. 

(2) Debate on the resolution, and on all debatable motions and appeals in connection 

therewith, shall be limited to not more than 2 hours, which shall be divided equally between 

those favoring and those opposing the resolution. An amendment to the resolution is not in order. 

A motion further to limit debate is in order and not debatable. A motion to postpone, or a motion 
D-31

to proceed to the consideration of other business, or a motion to recommit the resolution is not in 

order. A motion to reconsider the vote by which the resolution is agreed to or disagreed to is not 

in order. 

(3) Immediately following the conclusion of the debate on a resolution described in 

subsection (a) and a single quorum call at the conclusion of the debate if requested in accordance 

with the rules of the appropriate House, the vote on final passage of the resolution shall occur. 

(4) Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the 

Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, to the procedure relating to a 

resolution described in subsection (a) shall be decided without debate. 

(e) CONSIDERATION BY OTHER HOUSE.--(1) If, before the passage by one House of a 

resolution of that House described in subsection (a), that House receives from the other House a 

resolution described in subsection (a), then the following procedures shall apply: 

(A) The resolution of the other House shall not be referred to a committee and 

may not be considered in the House receiving it except in the case of final passage as 

provided in subparagraph (B)(ii). 

(B) With respect to a resolution described in subsection (a) of the House receiving 

the resolution-- 

(i) the procedure in that House shall be the same as if no resolution had 

been received from the other House; but 

(ii) the vote on final passage shall be on the resolution of the other House. 

(2) Upon disposition of the resolution received from the other House, it shall no longer be 

in order to consider the resolution that originated in the receiving House. 

(f) RULES OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE.--This section is enacted by Congress-- 

(1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate and House of 

Representatives, respectively, and as such it is deemed a part of the rules of each House, 

respectively, but applicable only with respect to the procedure to be followed in that 

House in the case of a resolution described in subsection (a), and it supersedes other rules 

only to the extent that it is inconsistent with such rules; and 

(2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of either House to change the 

rules (so far as relating to the procedure of that House) at any time, in the same manner, 

and to the same extent as in the case of any other rule of that House. 

SEC. 2909. RESTRICTION ON OTHER BASE CLOSURE AUTHORITY

(a) IN GENERAL.--Except as provided in subsection (c), during the period beginning on 

November 5, 1990, and ending on April 15, 2006, this part shall be the exclusive authority for 

selecting for closure or realignment, or for carrying out any closure or realignment of, a military 

installation inside the United States. 

(b) RESTRICTION.--Except as provided in subsection (c), none of the funds available to 

the Department of Defense may be used, other than under this part, during the period specified in 

subsection (a) 

(1) to identify, through any transmittal to the Congress or through any other 

public announcement or notification, any military installation inside the United States as 
D-32

an installation to be closed or realigned or as an installation under consideration for 

closure or realignment; or 

(2) to carry out any closure or realignment of a military installation inside the 

United States. 

(c) EXCEPTION.--Nothing in this part affects the authority of the Secretary to carry out 

(1) closures and realignments under title II of Public Law 100-526; and 

(2) closures and realignments to which section 2687 of title 10, United States 

Code, is not applicable, including closures and realignments carried out for reasons of 

national security or a military emergency referred to in subsection (c) of such section. 

SEC. 2910. DEFINITIONS

As used in this part: 

(1) The term "Account" means the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 

established by section 2906(a)(1). 

(2) The term "congressional defense committees" means the Committee on Armed 

Services and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the Committee on Armed 

Services and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. 

(3) The term "Commission" means the Commission established by section 2902. 

(4) The term "military installation" means a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, 

homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction of the Department of 

Defense, including any leased facility. Such term does not include any facility used primarily for 

civil works, rivers and harbors projects, flood control, or other projects not under the primary 

jurisdiction or control of the Department of Defense. [The preceding sentence shall take effect as 

of November 5, 1990, and shall apply as if it had been included in section 2910(4) of the Defense 

Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 on that date.] 

(5) The term "realignment" includes any action which both reduces and relocates 

functions and civilian personnel positions but does not include a reduction in force resulting 

from workload adjustments, reduced personnel or funding levels, or skill imbalances. 

(6) The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Defense. 

(7) The term "United States" means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the 

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and any other 

commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States. 

(8) The term "date of approval", with respect to a closure or realignment of an 

installation, means the date on which the authority of Congress to disapprove a recommendation 

of closure or realignment, as the case may be, of such installation under this part expires. [The 

date of approval of closure of any installation approved for closure before November 30, 1993 

shall be deemed to be November 30, 1993.] 

(9) The term "redevelopment authority", in the case of an installation to be closed or 

realigned under this part, means any entity (including an entity established by a State or local 

government) recognized by the Secretary of Defense as the entity responsible for developing the 

redevelopment plan with respect to the installation or for directing the implementation of such 

plan. [The above revision shall take effect as if included in the amendments made by section 

2918 of Pub. L. 103-160.] 
D-33

(10) The term "redevelopment plan" in the case of an installation to be closed or 

realigned under this part, means a plan that-- 

(A) is agreed to by the local redevelopment authority with respect to the 

installation; and 

(B) provides for the reuse or redevelopment of the real property and personal 

property of the installation that is available for such reuse and redevelopment as a result 

of the closure or realignment of the installation. 

(11) The term "representative of the homeless" has the meaning given such term in 

section 501(i)(4) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11411(i)(4)). 

SEC. 2911. CLARIFYING AMENDMENT

Section 2687(e)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended-- 

(1) by inserting "homeport facility for any ship," after "center,"; and 

(2) by striking out "under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of a military 

department" and inserting in lieu thereof "under the jurisdiction of the Department of 

Defense, including any leased facility,". 

SEC. 2912. 2005 ROUND OF REALIGNMENTS AND CLOSURES OF MILITARY 

INSTALLATIONS. 

 (a) FORCE-STRUCTURE PLAN AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORY.— 

 (1) PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION.—As part of the budget justification 

documents submitted to Congress in support of the budget for the Department of Defense 

for fiscal year 2005, the Secretary shall include the following: 

 (A) A force-structure plan for the Armed Forces based on an assessment 

by the Secretary of the probable threats to the national security during the 20-year 

period beginning with fiscal year 2005, the probable end-strength levels and 

major military force units (including land force divisions, carrier and other major 

combatant vessels, air wings, and other comparable units) needed to meet these 

threats, and the anticipated levels of funding that will be available for national 

defense purposes during such period. 

 (B) A comprehensive inventory of military installations world-wide for 

each military department, with specifications of the number and type of facilities 

in the active and reserve forces of each military department. 

 (2) RELATIONSHIP OF PLAN AND INVENTORY.— Using the force-structure plan 

and infrastructure inventory prepared under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall prepare 

(and include as part of the submission of such plan and inventory) the following: 

 (A) A description of the infrastructure necessary to support the force 

structure described in the force-structure plan. 

 (B) A discussion of categories of excess infrastructure and infrastructure 

capacity. 

 (C) An economic analysis of the effect of the closure or realignment of 

military installations to reduce excess infrastructure. 
D-34

 (3) SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS.—In determining the level of necessary versus 

excess infrastructure under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall consider the following: 

 (A) The anticipated continuing need for and availability of military 

installations outside the United States, taking into account current restrictions on 

the use of military installations outside the United States and the potential for 

future prohibitions or restrictions on the use of such military installations. 

 (B) Any efficiencies that may be gained from joint tenancy by more than 

one branch of the Armed Forces at a military installation. 

 (4) REVISION.—The Secretary may revise the force-structure plan and 

infrastructure inventory; If the Secretary makes such a revision, the Secretary shall 

submit the revised plan or inventory to Congress not later than March 15, 2005. For 

purposes of selecting military installations for closure or realignment under this part in 

2005, no revision of the force-structure plan or infrastructure inventory is authorized after 

that date. 

 (b) CERTIFICATION OF NEED FOR FURTHER CLOSURES AND REALIGNMENTS.— 

 (1) CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.—On the basis of the force-structure plan and 

infrastructure inventory prepared under subsection (a) and the descriptions and economic 

analysis prepared under such subsection, the Secretary shall include as part of the 

submission of the plan and inventory— 

 (A) a certification regarding whether the need exists for the closure or 

realignment of additional military installations; and 

 (B) if such need exists, a certification that the additional round of closures 

and realignments would result in annual net savings for each of the military departments beginning not later than fiscal year 2011. 

 (2) EFFECT OF FAILURE TO CERTIFY.—If the Secretary does not include the 

certifications referred to in paragraph (1), the process by which military installations may 

be selected for closure or realignment under this part in 2005 shall be terminated. 

 (c) COMPTROLLER GENERAL EVALUATION.— 

 (1) EVALUATION REQUIRED.—If the certification is provided under subsection (b), 

the Comptroller General shall prepare an evaluation of the following: 

 (A) The force-structure plan and infrastructure inventory prepared under 

subsection (a) and the final selection criteria specified in section 2913, including 

an evaluation of the accuracy and analytical sufficiency of such plan, inventory, 

and criteria. 

 (B) The need for the closure or realignment of additional military 

installations. 

 (2) SUBMISSION.—The Comptroller General shall submit the evaluation to 

Congress not later than 60 days after the date on which the force-structure plan and infrastructure inventory are submitted to Congress. 

 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL ROUND; COMMISSION.— 

 (1) APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSION.—Subject to the certifications required under 

subsection (b), the President may commence an additional round for the selection of 

military installations for closure and realignment under this part in 2005 by transmitting 
D-35

to the Senate, not later than March 15, 2005, nominations pursuant to section 2902(c) for 

the appointment of new members to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 

Commission. 

 (2) EFFECT OF FAILURE TO NOMINATE.—If the President does not transmit to the 

Senate the nominations for the Commission by March 15, 2005, the process by which 

military installations may be selected for closure or realignment under this part in 2005 

shall be terminated. 

 (3) MEMBERS.—Notwithstanding section 2902(c)(1), the Commission appointed 

under the authority of this subsection shall consist of nine members. 

 (4) TERMS; MEETINGS; TERMINATION.—Notwithstanding subsections (d), (e)(1), 

and (1) of section 2902, the Commission appointed under the authority of this subsection 

shall meet during calendar year 2005 and shall terminate on April 15, 2006. 

 (5) FUNDING.—If no funds are appropriated to the Commission by the end of the 

second session of the 108th Congress for the activities of the Commission in 2005, the 

Secretary may transfer to the Commission for purposes of its activities under this part in 

that year such funds as the Commission may require to carry out such activities. The 

Secretary may transfer funds under the preceding sentence from any funds available to 

the Secretary. Funds so transferred shall remain available to the Commission for such 

purposes until expended. 

SEC. 2913. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR 2005 ROUND. 

(a) FINAL SELECTION CRITERIA.—The final criteria to be used by the Secretary in making 

recommendations for the closure or realignment of military installations inside the United States 

under this part in 2005 shall be the military value and other criteria specified in subsections (b) 

and (c). 

(b) MILITARY VALUE CRITERIA.— The military value criteria are as follows: 

(1) The current and future mission capabilities and the impact on operational 

readiness o the total force of the Department of Defense, including the impact on joint 

warfighting, training, and readiness. 

(2) The availability and condition of land, facilities, and associated airspace 

(including training areas suitable for maneuver by ground, naval, or air forces throughout 

a diversity of climate and terrain areas and staging areas for the use of the Armed Forces 

in homeland defense missions) at both existing and potential receiving locations. 

(3) The ability to accommodate contingency, mobilization, surge, and future total 

force requirements at both existing and potential receiving locations to support operations 

and training. 

(4) The cost of operations and the manpower implications. 

(c) OTHER CRITERIA.—The other criteria that the Secretary shall use in making 

recommendations for the closure or realignment of military installations inside the United States 

under this part in 2005 are as follows: 

(1) The extent and timing of potential costs and savings, including the number of 

years, beginning with the date of completion of the closure or realignment, for the 

savings to exceed the costs. 
D-36

(2) The economic impact on existing communities in the vicinity of military 

installations. 

(3) The ability of the infrastructure of both the existing and potential receiving 

communities to support forces, missions, and personnel. 

(4) The environmental impact, including the impact of costs related to potential 

environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance activities. 

(d) PRIORITY GIVEN TO MILITARY VALUE.—The Secretary shall give priority 

consideration tot he military value criteria specified in subsection (b) in the making of 

recommendations for the closure or realignment of military installations. 

(e) EFFECT ON DEPARTMENT AND OTHER AGENCY COSTS.—The selection criteria relating to the cost savings or return on investment from the proposed closure or realignment of 

military installations shall take into account the effect of the proposed closure or realignment on 

the costs of any other activity of the Department of Defense or any other Federal agency that 

may be required to assume responsibility for activities at the military installations. 

(f) RELATION TO OTHER MATERIALS.—The final selection criteria specified in this section 

shall be the only criteria to be used, along with the force-structure plan and infrastructure 

inventory referred to in section 2912, in making recommendations for the closure or realignment 

of military installations inside the Untied States under this part in 2005. 

(g) RELATION TO CRITERIA FOR EARLIER ROUNDS.—Section 2903(b), and the selection 

criteria prepared under such section, shall not apply with respect to the process of making 

recommendations for the closure or realignment of military installations in 2005. 

SEC. 2914. SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 

REALIGNMENTS AND CLOSURES FOR 2005 ROUND; COMMISSION 

CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS. 

(a) RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING CLOSURE OR REALIGNMENT OF MILITARY 

INSTALLATIONS.—If the Secretary makes the certifications required under section 2912(b), the 

Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register and transmit to the congressional defense 

committees and the Commission, not later than May 16, 2005, a list of the military installations 

inside the United States that the Secretary recommends for closure or realignment on the basis of 

the force-structure plan and infrastructure inventory prepared by the Secretary under section 

2912 and the final selection criteria specified in section 2913. 

(b) PREPARATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall comply with paragraphs (2) through (6) of 

section 2903(c) in preparing and transmitting the recommendations under this section. 

However, paragraph (6) of section 2903(e) relating to submission of information to 

Congress shall be deemed to require such submission within 48 hours. 

(2) CONSIDERATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT VIEWS.—(A) In making 

recommendations to the Commission in 2005, the Secretary shall consider any notice 

received from a local government in the vicinity of a military installation that the 
D-37

government would approve of the closure or realignment of the installation, 

(B) Notwithstanding the requirement in subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall 

make the recommendations referred to in that subparagraph based on the force-structure 

plan, infrastructure inventory, and final selection criteria otherwise applicable to such 

recommendations. 

(C) The recommendations shall include a statement of the result of the 

consideration of any notice described in subparagraph (A) that is received with respect to 

a military installation covered by such recommendations. The statement shall set forth 

the reasons for the result. 

(d) COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in this subsection, section 2903(d) shall 

apply to the consideration by the Commission of the recommendations transmitted by the 

Secretary in 2005. The Commission’s report containing its findings and conclusions, 

based on a review and analysis of the Secretary’s recommendations, shall be transmitted 

to the President not later than September 8, 2005. 

(2) AVAILABILITY OF RECOMMENDATIONS TO CONGRESS.—After September 8, 

2005, the Commission shall promptly provide, upon request, to any Member of Congress 

information used by the Commission in making its recommendations. 

(3) LIMITATIONS ON AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER ADDITIONS TO CLOSURE OR 

REALIGNMENT LISTS.—The Commission may not consider making a change in the 

recommendations of the Secretary that would add a military installation to the Secretary’s 

list of installations recommended for closure or realignment unless, in addition to the 

requirements of section 2903(d)(2)(C)— 

(A) the Commission provides the Secretary with at least a 15-day period, 

before making the change, in which to submit an explanation of the reasons why 

the installation was not included on the closure or realignment list by the 

Secretary; and 

(B) the decision to add the installation for Commission consideration is 

supported by at least seven members of the Commission. 

(4) TESTIMONY BY SECRETARY.—The Commission shall invite the Secretary to 

testify at a public hearing, or a closed hearing if classified information is involved, on 

any proposed change by the Commission to the Secretary’s recommendations. 

(5) REQUIREMENTS TO EXPAND CLOSURE OR REALIGNMENT 

RECOMMENDATIONS.—In the report required under section 2903(d)(2)(A) that is to be 

transmitted under paragraph (1), the Commission may not make a change in the 

recommendations of the Secretary that would close a military installation not 

recommended for closure by the Secretary, would realign a military installation not 

recommended for closure or realignment by the Secretary, or would expand the extent of 

the realignment of a military installation recommended for realignment by the Secretary 

unless— 

(A) at least two members of the Commission visit the military installation 

before the date of the transmittal of the report; and 
D-38

(B) the decision of the Commission to make the change to recommend the 

closure of the military installation, the realignment of the installation, or the 

expanded realignment of the installation is supported by at least seven members 

of the Commission. 

(6) COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT.—The Comptroller General report required 

by section 2903(d)(5)(B) analyzing the recommendations of the Secretary and the selection process in 2005 shall be transmitted to the congressional defense committees not 

later than July 1, 2005. 

(e) REVIEW BY THE PRESIDENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in this subsection, section 2903(e) shall 

apply to the review by the President of the recommendations of the Commission under 

this section, and the actions, if any, of the Commission in response to such review, in 

2005. The President shall review the recommendations of the Secretary and the recommendations contained in the report of the Commission under subsection (d) and 

prepare a report, not later than September ‘23, 2005, containing the President’s approval 

or disapproval of the Commission's recommendations. 

(2) COMMISSION RECONSIDERATION.—If the Commission prepares a revised list 

of recommendations under section 2903(e)(3) in 2005 in response to the review of the 

President in that year under paragraph (1), the Commission shall transmit the revised list 

to the President not later than October 20, 2005. 

(3) EFFECT OF FAILURE TO TRANSMIT.—If the President does not transmit to 

Congress an approval and certification described in paragraph (2) or (4) of section 

2903(e) by November 7, 2005, the process by which military installations may be 

selected for closure or realignment under this part in 2005 shall be terminated. 

(4) EFFECT OF TRANSMITTAL.—A report of the President under this subsection 

containing the President’s approval of the Commission’s recommendations is deemed to 

be a report under section 2903(e) for purposes of sections 2904 and 2908. 
E-i

Appendix E 

Index of Policy Memoranda 

• Transformation Through Base Realignment and Closure, November 15, 2002 E-1 

• Transformation Through Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC 2005) 

Policy Memorandum One – Policy, Responsibilities, and Procedures, 

April 16, 2003 

E-5 

• Interim Selection Criteria, June 27, 2003 E-65 

• Policy Memorandum Two – BRAC 2005 Military Value Principles, 

October 14, 2004 

E-67 

• Transformation Through Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC 2005) 

Policy Memorandum Three – Selection Criterion 5, December 7, 2004 

E-69 

• Transformation Through Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC 2005) 

Policy Memorandum Four – Selection Criteria 7 and 8, December 7, 2004 

E-79 

• Transformation Through Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC 2005) 

Policy Memorandum Five – Homeland Defense, December 10, 2004 

E-95 

• Transformation Through Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC 2005) 

Policy Memorandum Six – Selection Criterion 6, December 20, 2004 

E-97 

• Transformation Through Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC 2005) 

Policy Memorandum Seven – Surge, January 4, 2005 

E-113 

• Transformation Through Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC 2005) 

Policy Memorandum Eight – Selection Criterion 8, January 4, 2005 

E-117 

• 2005 Base Closure and Realignment Selection Criteria, January 4, 2005 E-119 
E-ii






































































































As of: Mon Dec 13 12:35:44 EST 2004

ECONOMIC IMPACT DATA

Scenario: SAMPLE EIT OUTPUT

Economic Region of Influence(ROI): Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Division

Base: BAILEY'S CROSSROADS

Action: Move Lease 1

Overall Economic Impact of Proposed BRAC-05 Action:

ROI Population (2002): 3,895,337

ROI Employment (2002): 2,771,791

Authorized Manpower (2005): 695

Authorized Manpower(2005) / ROI Employment(2002): 0.03%

Total Estimated Job Change: -1,039

Total Estimated Job Change / ROI Employment(2002): -0.04%

Cumulative Job Change (Gain/Loss) Over Time:
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Division Trend Data

Employment Trend (1988-2002)

YEAR: 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Index: 1 1.03 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.03 1.04 1.06 1.07 1.1 1.12 1.15 1.2 1.22 1.23

Represents the ROI's indexed employment change since 1988

Unemployment Percentage Trend (1990-2003)

YEAR: 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

ROI: 3.42% 4.87% 5.6% 5% 4.4% 4.48% 4.23% 3.94% 3.47% 2.82% 2.53% 3.27% 3.89% 3.75%

USA: 5.6% 6.83% 7.5% 6.91% 6.09% 5.59% 5.4% 4.94% 4.51% 4.21% 3.99% 4.74% 5.79% 5.99%

Per Capita Income x $1,000 (1988-2002)

YEAR: 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

ROI: $35.91 $36.47 $36.33 $35.74 $36.05 $36.18 $36.42 $36.33 $36.47 $37.51 $38.94 $40.22 $41.65 $42.28 $42.06

USA: $26.96 $27.48 $27.42 $26.87 $27.35 $27.18 $27.53 $27.86 $28.35 $29.04 $30.35 $30.86 $31.89 $31.72 $31.61
As of: Mon Dec 13 12:35:44 EST 2004

ECONOMIC IMPACT DATA

Scenario: SAMPLE EIT OUTPUT

Economic Region of Influence(ROI): Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Division

Base: CRYSTAL CITY LEASE

Action: Move Lease 2

Overall Economic Impact of Proposed BRAC-05 Action:

ROI Population (2002): 3,895,337

ROI Employment (2002): 2,771,791

Authorized Manpower (2005): 1,816

Authorized Manpower(2005) / ROI Employment(2002): 0.07%

Total Estimated Job Change: -3,105

Total Estimated Job Change / ROI Employment(2002): -0.11%

Cumulative Job Change (Gain/Loss) Over Time:
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Division Trend Data

Employment Trend (1988-2002)

YEAR: 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Index: 1 1.03 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.03 1.04 1.06 1.07 1.1 1.12 1.15 1.2 1.22 1.23

Represents the ROI's indexed employment change since 1988

Unemployment Percentage Trend (1990-2003)

YEAR: 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

ROI: 3.42% 4.87% 5.6% 5% 4.4% 4.48% 4.23% 3.94% 3.47% 2.82% 2.53% 3.27% 3.89% 3.75%

USA: 5.6% 6.83% 7.5% 6.91% 6.09% 5.59% 5.4% 4.94% 4.51% 4.21% 3.99% 4.74% 5.79% 5.99%

Per Capita Income x $1,000 (1988-2002)

YEAR: 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

ROI: $35.91 $36.47 $36.33 $35.74 $36.05 $36.18 $36.42 $36.33 $36.47 $37.51 $38.94 $40.22 $41.65 $42.28 $42.06

USA: $26.96 $27.48 $27.42 $26.87 $27.35 $27.18 $27.53 $27.86 $28.35 $29.04 $30.35 $30.86 $31.89 $31.72 $31.61
As of: Mon Dec 13 12:35:44 EST 2004

ECONOMIC IMPACT DATA

Scenario: SAMPLE EIT OUTPUT

Economic Region of Influence(ROI): Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Division

Base: BALSTON LEASE

Action: Move Lease 3

Overall Economic Impact of Proposed BRAC-05 Action:

ROI Population (2002): 3,895,337

ROI Employment (2002): 2,771,791

Authorized Manpower (2005): 98

Authorized Manpower(2005) / ROI Employment(2002): 0%

Total Estimated Job Change: -589

Total Estimated Job Change / ROI Employment(2002): -0.02%

Cumulative Job Change (Gain/Loss) Over Time:
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Division Trend Data

Employment Trend (1988-2002)

YEAR: 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Index: 1 1.03 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.03 1.04 1.06 1.07 1.1 1.12 1.15 1.2 1.22 1.23

Represents the ROI's indexed employment change since 1988

Unemployment Percentage Trend (1990-2003)

YEAR: 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

ROI: 3.42% 4.87% 5.6% 5% 4.4% 4.48% 4.23% 3.94% 3.47% 2.82% 2.53% 3.27% 3.89% 3.75%

USA: 5.6% 6.83% 7.5% 6.91% 6.09% 5.59% 5.4% 4.94% 4.51% 4.21% 3.99% 4.74% 5.79% 5.99%

Per Capita Income x $1,000 (1988-2002)

YEAR: 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

ROI: $35.91 $36.47 $36.33 $35.74 $36.05 $36.18 $36.42 $36.33 $36.47 $37.51 $38.94 $40.22 $41.65 $42.28 $42.06

USA: $26.96 $27.48 $27.42 $26.87 $27.35 $27.18 $27.53 $27.86 $28.35 $29.04 $30.35 $30.86 $31.89 $31.72 $31.61
As of: Mon Dec 13 12:35:44 EST 2004

ECONOMIC IMPACT DATA

Scenario: SAMPLE EIT OUTPUT

Economic Region of Influence(ROI): Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Division

Base: HOFFMAN LEASE

Action: Move Lease 4

Overall Economic Impact of Proposed BRAC-05 Action:

ROI Population (2002): 3,895,337

ROI Employment (2002): 2,771,791

Authorized Manpower (2005): 2,316

Authorized Manpower(2005) / ROI Employment(2002): 0.08%

Total Estimated Job Change: -1,339

Total Estimated Job Change / ROI Employment(2002): -0.05%

Cumulative Job Change (Gain/Loss) Over Time:
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metropolitan Division Trend Data

Employment Trend (1988-2002)

YEAR: 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Index: 1 1.03 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.03 1.04 1.06 1.07 1.1 1.12 1.15 1.2 1.22 1.23

Represents the ROI's indexed employment change since 1988

Unemployment Percentage Trend (1990-2003)

YEAR: 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

ROI: 3.42% 4.87% 5.6% 5% 4.4% 4.48% 4.23% 3.94% 3.47% 2.82% 2.53% 3.27% 3.89% 3.75%

USA: 5.6% 6.83% 7.5% 6.91% 6.09% 5.59% 5.4% 4.94% 4.51% 4.21% 3.99% 4.74% 5.79% 5.99%

Per Capita Income x $1,000 (1988-2002)

YEAR: 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

ROI: $35.91 $36.47 $36.33 $35.74 $36.05 $36.18 $36.42 $36.33 $36.47 $37.51 $38.94 $40.22 $41.65 $42.28 $42.06

USA: $26.96 $27.48 $27.42 $26.87 $27.35 $27.18 $27.53 $27.86 $28.35 $29.04 $30.35 $30.86 $31.89 $31.72 $31.61