alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 739.000 Scope of part. This part prescribes acquisition policies and procedures for use in acquiring— ( a ) Information technology, as defined in this part, consistent with the Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA).
( b ) Information and communication technology (ICT), as defined in FAR 2.101.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Page 9 of 24
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-B
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

JPMorgan Chase Bank                        Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126             fka, Bankers Trust Company
Chicago, IL  60670                         60 Wall Street, 26th Floor-MS
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration       NYC60-2606
Phone: (312) 407-0192                      New York, NY 10007
Fax: (312) 407-1708                        Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
                                                 Structured Finance
                                           Phone: (212) 250-8522
                                           Fax: (212) 797-8606

Key Bank USA, National Association         MBIA Insurance Corporation
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor                113 King Street
Cleveland, OH 44114                        Armonk, NY 10504
ATTN:  President, KER                      ATTN: Data Administration
Phone: (216) 828-4293                      Phone: (914) 765-3772
Fax: (216) 828-9301                        Fax: (914) 765-3660

Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among Key Bank USA,
National Association, as Seller, Master Servicer and Administrator, KeyCorp
Student Loan Trust 2000-B Trust, as Issuer, and JPMorgan Chase Bank as successor
in interest to Bank One, National Association, not in its individual capacity
but solely as Eligible Lender Trustee, dated as of September 1, 2000 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of the Master Servicer from January 1, 2003, through December 31,
2003, and of its performance under the Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the
best of our knowledge, based on our review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period.

                                        Key Bank USA, National Association,
                                        as Master Servicer

                                        by: /S/ DARLENE H. DIMITRIJEVS
                                            ------------------------------------
Date: February 19, 2004                 Name: Darlene H. Dimitrijevs
                                        Title: Senior Vice President

                                        by: /S/ DEBRA S. FRONIUS
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: Debra S. Fronius
                                        Title: Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6178

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MAURICE FOSTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (7:05-cv-00770-SGW; 95-cr-242-12)

Submitted: July 12, 2006 Decided: July 27, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Foster, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

The district court also construed the petition as a motion

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and dismissed it as successive.

Because the district court did not have jurisdiction under § 2255

to consider the validity of Foster’s sentence on his convictions

arising out of the Northern District of Illinois, we decline to

consider this case under § 2255. 

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Foster appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000),

asserting error under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005),

and the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)

motion for reconsideration of that order. As the district court

correctly concluded, Foster does not meet the standard under In re

Jones, 226 F.3d 328, 333-34 (4th Cir. 2000); thus, he was not

entitled to proceed under § 2241.* Accordingly, we affirm the

denial of relief. We grant Foster leave to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### 909.407 Suspension.
Exhibit 10.1

OCCUPANCY AGREEMENT

This
AGREEMENT (the Agreement),
effective as of January 1, 2009 (the
Effective Date), between Twin Lakes
Delaware, Inc. (the
Corporation), a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware
and Kirk M. Warshaw, LLC (the LLC), a limited liability company organized
under the laws of the State of New Jersey.

WHEREAS,
the Corporations principal offices are located at 47 School
Avenue, Chatham, New Jersey and such premises are owned by the LLC (the
Principal Offices); and

WHEREAS,
the Corporation and the LLC wishes to enter into an agreement for use and
occupancy of the Principal Offices and certain administrative services;

NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, it is agreed that:

Effective
as of the Effective Date, the Corporation hereby agrees that it shall pay to
the LLC a quarterly occupancy and administrative services fee in the amount of
U.S. five hundred dollars ($500) on each of January 1, April 1, July 1 and
October 1 until such time as this Agreement is terminated by written notice of
either party.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly
executed and delivered this Agreement effective as of the Effective Date on
January 29, 2009.

| |                                        |                        
| | -------------------------------------- | -----------------------
| | TWIN LAKES DELAWARE, INC.,            
| | a Delaware corporation                
| |                                        |                        
| | By:                                    | /s/
 Arnold P. Kling   
| |                                        |                        
| |                                        | Name: Arnold
 P. Kling 
| |                                        | Title:   President     
| |                                        |                        
| | Kirk M. Warshaw, LLC.,                
| | a New Jersey limited liability company
| |                                        |                        
| | By:                                    | /s/
 Kirk Warshaw      
| |                                        |                        
| |                                        | Name: Kirk
 Warshaw    
| |                                        | Title:
 Managing Member

---
(November 12, 1964)

#### Micheline Lerner, Respondent-Appellant, v. Alan J. Lerner, Appellant-Respondent.

Order, entered on July 3, 1964, awarding plaintiff temporary alimony and counsel fee unanimously affirmed, without costs, with leave to defendant to move for a reduction of the temporary alimony in the event *772plaintiff is not ready to proceed to trial when the cause is reached on the General Equity Dropped Calendar of Special and Trial Term, Part I, New York County and thereafter. The record herein demonstrates the recurrent aspects o£ applications of this type in which the respective financial needs and resources of the parties are contested in affidavits which make exaggerated claims as to plaintiff’s requirements and disingenuous concealment of the resources and income of the parties. Special Term made specific reference to defendant’s “palpable reluctance to make a true disclosure of his income and resources ”, It might be added that plaintiff, too, demonstrated a calculated effort to. conceal the extent of her personal assets and income. However, insofar as can be ascertained from the conflicting affidavits, the awards made by Special Term may not be said to be excessive. Nor is there any basis for considering such awards insufficient, as contended in plaintiff’s cross appeal. Obviously, the best protection for both parties against their respective claims of inadequacy and excessiveness of the award of temporary alimony is a speedy trial where if necessary the true facts as to the finances of the parties can be ascertained, and plaintiff’s right to alimony can be finally determined. We note that the ease appeared on the Ready Day Calendar at Special Term, Part XII, on November 2, 1964, and was placed on the General Equity Dropped Calendar when both parties signified they were ready for trial. Hence, it may be anticipated that there will -be an early trial of the action. Should plaintiff fail to proceed to trial when the cause is reached, then defendant should be given the opportunity to move for a substantial reduction in the temporary alimony award. Affirmance of the order of Special Term, with that condition, will tend to actuate both parties in pressing' for a speedy trial. Our affirmance of the award is, however, not to have any effect on the Trial Judge in his determination as to permanent alimony which determination should rest entirely upon the proof adduced at the trial. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 11008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03634]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Calendar Year 2020 Cost of Outpatient Medical, Dental, and 
Cosmetic Surgery Services Furnished by the Department of Defense 
Medical Treatment Facilities; Certain Rates Regarding Recovery From 
Tortiously Liable Third Persons

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Executive Office of the 
President.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    By virtue of the authority vested in the President by 42 U.S.C. 
2652, the rates referenced below are hereby established. These rates 
are for use in connection with the recovery from tortiously liable 
third persons for the outpatient medical, dental and cosmetic surgery 
services furnished by military treatment facilities through the 
Department of Defense. They are the same rates as the outpatient third 
party reimbursement rates that were set on July 1, 2020 for billing 
medical insurers, but require a different approval authority for the 
purpose of billing for tort liability. The rates were established in 
accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-25, requiring 
reimbursement of the full cost of all services provided. The Calendar 
Year 2020 outpatient medical, dental and cosmetic surgery services 
referenced are effective for billing tort liability upon publication of 
this notice in the Federal Register and will remain in effect until 
further notice. Previously published inpatient rates remain in effect 
until further notice. Pharmacy rates are updated periodically. A full 
disclosure of the rates is posted at Health.mil website in the Defense 
Health Agency Uniform Business Office section (http://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Business-Support/Uniform-Business-Office/Billing/Medical-Affirmative-Claims).

Robert S. Fairweather,
Deputy Associate Director, International Affairs Division, Acting 
Director.
[FR Doc. 2021-03634 Filed 2-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
#### 852.237-79 Subcontracting.

As prescribed in 837.7001(b)(3), insert the following clause:

# Subcontracting (OCT 2019)

The Contractor shall not subcontract any work under this contract without the Contracting Officer's written approval. This clause does not apply to contracts of employment between the Contractor and its personnel.

(End of clause)

[84 FR 46457, Sept. 4, 2019]
##### 



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Champion Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we,
Marshall T. Reynolds, Todd R. Fry and Kirby J. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer,
respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:



| |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By:      /s/Marshall T. ReynoldsMarshall T. Reynolds
Chief Executive OfficerBy:      /s/ Todd R. FryTodd R. Fry
Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerBy:      /s/ Kirby J. TaylorKirby J. Taylor
President and Chief Operating OfficerDate:
    
    September 12, 2003
919.7011 Developmental assistance. ( a ) The forms of developmental assistance a Mentor may provide to a Protege include, but are not limited to— ( 1 ) Management guidance relating to— ( i ) Financial management,
( ii ) Organizational management,
( iii ) Overall business management planning,
( iv ) Business development, and
( v ) Marketing assistance;
( 2 ) Engineering and other technical assistance;
( 3 ) Noncompetitive award of subcontracts under DOE or other Federal contracts where otherwise authorized;
( 4 ) Award of subcontracts in the Mentor's commercial activities;
( 5 ) Progress payments based on costs;
( 6 ) Rent-free use of facilities and/or equipment owned or leased by Mentor; and
( 7 ) Temporary assignment of Mentor personnel to the Protege for purposes of training.
( b ) Costs incurred by a Mentor to provide developmental assistance, as described in paragraph (a) of this section, are allowable only to the extent provided at 919.7003(b).
[49 FR 11997, Mar. 28, 1984, as amended at 75 FR 69012, Nov. 10, 2010]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the annual report of Twin Lakes  Delaware,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Arnold P. Kling,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 17, 2008


/s/ Arnold P. Kling
-------------------
Arnold P. Kling
President
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1147.206 Enforcement.

Where applicable, AMS will verify an eligible dairy organization's payment of the input cost. AMS will also conduct spot checks, reviews, and audits of the reports and documentation submitted pursuant to § 1147.106(a) to verify accuracy and to ensure the integrity of the Dairy Donation Program.
#### Elizabeth Jackson, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of James Jackson, Deceased, Appellant, v Bronx *357Lebanon Hospital Center, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[775 NYS2d 859]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert J. Emanuelli, J.), entered March 19, 2003, which, to the extent appealable, denied renewal of a prior order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate dismissal of the action without prejudice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Having received a 90-day notice and stipulated, in 1998, to file a note of issue on the understanding that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the action, plaintiff neither filed the note nor moved in a timely fashion for an extension of time to comply. In 2001, Justice George Friedman denied plaintiffs motion to vacate the default, with leave to renew upon an affidavit of merit with a reasonable excuse, to be submitted “in admissible form.”

The purported “affidavit” of David Berkowitz, an attorney who had handled the case for plaintiffs retained counsel, is the same document Justice Friedman rejected as insufficient on the original vacatur motion. For her “reasonable excuse,” plaintiff this time pointed to Berkowitz’s suspension from the practice of law, which actually took place 8V2 months after the deadline for filing the note of issue. Plaintiffs failure to establish a meritorious claim in this medical malpractice action *(see Mosberg v Elahi,*80 NY2d 941 [1992]) was not cured by submitting, for the first time in reply, her “physician’s affirmation of merit” that still did not address with requisite specificity the issue of causation or the alleged departure from acceptable medical practice *(see Nepomniaschi v Goldstein,*182 AD2d 743 [1992]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.
939.7002 Contractor acquisition of information technology. ( a ) *Management and operating (M&O) contracts.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, M&O contractors and their subcontractors shall not be used to acquire information technology unrelated to the mission of the M&O contract either for sole use by DOE employees or employees of other DOE contractors, or for use by other Federal agencies or their contractors.
( b ) *Other than M&O contracts.* Where it has been determined that a contractor (other than an M&O contractor or its subcontractor) will acquire information technology either for sole use by DOE employees or for the furnishing of the information technology as government-furnished property under another contract, and after receiving written authorization from their cognizant DOE contracting office pursuant to 48 CFR part 51, DOE contractors working under cost-reimbursement-type contracts may place orders against authorized contracts. All authorizations to contractors shall expressly and specifically reference the restriction regarding contractor use of the items acquired, cited at 951.102(e)(4)(iii).
( c ) *Consolidated contractor acquisitions.* When common information technology requirements in support of DOE programs have been identified and it is anticipated that the consolidation of such requirements will promote cost or other efficiencies, the Designated Senior Official for Information Management may authorize an M&O contractor to acquire information technology for use by the following— ( 1 ) One or more other contractor(s) performing on-site at the same DOE-owned or -leased facility as the M&O contractor; or
( 2 ) Other M&O contractors.
[62 FR 53758, Oct. 16, 1997, as amended at 74 FR 36367, July 22, 2009]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Technology, Teen Dating Violence and Abuse, and Bullying      

# Technology, Teen Dating Violence and Abuse, and Bullying

This study from the Department of Justice analyzed violence and abuse experienced by teens via technology, as well as the cyber abuse present within teen romantic relationships. Results showed that 17% of participants reported being victims of cyberbullying in the past year, with 26% of youth in relationships reporting cyber dating abuse. Girls were more likely than boys to report both types of victimization, and LGBTQ youth were more likely to experience both forms of abuse than heterosexual teens. 

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/243296.pdf
BULLETIN 1027 PLATE 59

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
LEVEL 4
Elev 3124 f
id
j
AM
70
J
All
4)
il
vA
I Hos
4
WYy
/
ii}!
y / EXPLANATION
I
I aos
Ilr Fault showing dip; dashed
i ‘where approximately located
Apr 20,
i Vertical faut
ify! ee
I, sete and pot beds
afi %.
Wy Strike and dip of overturned beds
i irs 90,
! 2
Strike of vertical beds
a
Vein

\ LEVEL 3
Elev 3422 ft

LEVEL 2
Eley 3516 ft

GEOLOGIC MAP OF WORKINGS AND LONGITUDINAL SECTION ALONG

ITY, IDAHO

200 Feet

VEIN, CRYSTAL LEAD MINE, SHOSHONE COUN
0

100
—=—

a
Foot of raise or winze

Sy
Head of raise or winze
8

Raise or winze extending
‘through levels

g

perewerers
Lagging or cribbing along drift

‘Caved workings

Bedrock is the Burke formation
Geology shown on levels 3 and 4

Pian and section adapted from map
by Day Mines, Inc. Geology by
Garth M. Crosby, chief geologist
#### § 1126.78 Charges on overdue accounts.

See § 1000.78.
951.101 Policy. ( a ) It is Department of Energy (DOE) policy that contractors performing under cost-reimbursement contracts should meet their requirements from Government sources of supply when these sources are available to them, and if it is economically advantageous or otherwise in the best interest of the Government.
[49 FR 12042, Mar. 28, 1984, as amended at 74 FR 36368, July 22, 2009]