alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Guide to Writing about Traumatic Brain Injury in News and Social Media      

# Guide to Writing about Traumatic Brain Injury in News and Social Media

This guide from CDC can help media writers, editors, and bloggers better understand traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). With information related to prevalence, symptoms, at-risk groups, and prevention of TBIs, this guide can assist writers in creating compelling, educational stories that improve the health of all Americans. 

http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/writing_guide.html?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
Exhibit
32











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Champion Industries, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,
Marshall T. Reynolds, Todd R. Fry and Toney K. Adkins, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer, respectively,
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:





·
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





·
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








By:  /s/Marshall T. Reynolds


Marshall
T. Reynolds


Chief
Executive Officer








By:  /s/ Todd R. Fry


Todd R.
Fry


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








By:  /s/ Toney K. Adkins


Toney K.
Adkins


President
and Chief Operating Officer





Date: September
5, 2008
970.2270 Unemployment compensation. ( a ) Each state has its own unemployment compensation system to provide payments to workers who become unemployed involuntarily and through no fault of their own. Funds are provided for unemployment compensation benefits through a payroll tax on employers. Most DOE contractors are subject to the unemployment compensation tax laws of the states in which they are located. It is the policy to assure, both in the negotiation and administration of cost-reimbursement type contracts, that economical and practical arrangements are made and practiced with respect to unemployment compensation.
( b ) *Contract exempt from state laws.* ( 1 ) Some contractors are exempt from state unemployment compensation laws, usually on grounds that they are nonprofit organizations or subdivisions of State governments. Most states, however, permit such employers to elect unemployment compensation coverage on a voluntary basis. Under such circumstances, all existing or prospective cost-reimbursement contractors shall be encouraged to provide unemployment compensation coverage or equivalent substitutes.
( 2 ) It is also DOE policy that, prior to the award or extension of a management and operating contract, exempt contractors or prospective contractors shall be required to submit to the contracting officer a statement that they will either elect coverage or provide equivalent substitutes for unemployment compensation, or in the alternative, submit evidence that it is impractical to do so. If any exempt contractor or prospective contractor submits that it is impractical to elect coverage or to provide an equivalent substitute, appropriate Office of Contract and Resource Management, within the Headquarters procurement organization, staff shall review that position prior to recommending an award or extension of the contract. If there are substantial reasons for not electing coverage or for not providing equivalent substitutes, a contract may be awarded or extended. Headquarters' staff review and recommendation shall be based on such factors as— ( i ) The specific provisions of the unemployment compensation law of the State;
( ii ) The extent to which the establishment of special conditions on DOE work may have an adverse effect on the contractor's general policies and operating costs in its private operations;
( iii ) The numerical relationship between the contractor's private work force and its employees performing only work for DOE;
( iv ) The contractor's record with respect to work force stability and the general outlook with respect to future work force stability;
( v ) In a replacement contractor situation, whether or not the prior contractor had coverage or suitable substitutes; and
( vi ) The particular labor relations implications involved.
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36372, July 22, 2009]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7594

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

ARTHUR ROZIER, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (7:01-cr-00039-F-2) 

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Arthur Rozier, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Arthur Rozier appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction 

in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Rozier, No. 7:01-cr-00039-F-2 

(E.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
8.711 Quality complaints. ( a ) When the quality of supplies or services received is unsatisfactory, the using activity shall take the following actions: ( 1 ) For supplies received from DLA supply centers, GSA supply distribution facilities, or Department of Veterans Affairs distribution division, notify the supplying agency.
( 2 ) For supplies or services received from AbilityOne participating nonprofit agencies, address complaints to the individual nonprofit agency involved, with a copy to the appropriate central nonprofit agency.
( b ) When quality problems cannot be resolved by the AbilityOne participating nonprofit agency and the ordering office, the ordering office shall first contact the central nonprofit agency and then, if necessary, the Committee for resolution.
[48 FR 42129, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 59 FR 67029, Dec. 28, 1994; 73 FR 53995, Sept. 17, 2008]
Exhibit 11.1

Computations of Earnings Per Share:
The computation of basic and diluted
EPS is as follows:
                                          2005          2004
                                      -----------    -----------
Numerator:
  Net income attributable to
    common stockholders               $   692,857    $   652,276
                                      -----------    -----------
Denominator:
  Denominator for basic
   earnings per share -
     Weighted average shares            7,183,783      6,962,401
  Common stock equivalents                 56,938        231,719
                                      -----------    -----------
  Denominator for dilutive
   earnings per share -
     Weighted average shares            7,240,721      7,194,120
                                      ===========    ===========
Basic and diluted income per share    $      0.10    $      0.09
916.306 Cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts. ( c ) ( 2 ) The Head of the Contracting Activity, or designee, for contracts estimated to be within their delegated authority, may approve (sign) the determination and findings establishing the basis for application of the statutory price or fee limitations.
[49 FR 11955, Mar. 28, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9105, Feb. 25, 1994]
#### § 1006.43 General classification rules.

See § 1000.43.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1877
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ROY COOPER, Attorney General; HARRIET E. WORLEY, Assistant Attorney General ex rel., Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. TIARI EL & ASSOCIATES INDIGENOUS LAW FIRM; ANNIE LAURENCE BARBER, a/k/a Annie Barber Williams, a/k/a Anewa Shapheem Tiari-El; ROSA L. BARBER, a/k/a Rasheeda Shapheem-El; RALPH HAMMOND, a/k/a Nasir Hassan Bey; HAMMONDS & ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:03-cv-00919-H) Submitted: September 4, 2008 Decided: November 3, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anewa Shapheem Tiari-El, Rosa L. Barber, Ralph Hammond, HAMMONDS & ASSOCIATES, INC., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellants. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Defendants appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider the order remanding their case to state court due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court correctly found that it did not have jurisdiction to consider Defendants’ Rule 60(b) motion. See In re Lowe , 102 F.3d 731, 734-35 (4th Cir. 1996). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
#### § 1005.3 Route disposition.

See § 1000.3.
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

!"a$

!"c$

!"c$

!"a$ White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

± Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

?¿

?Â

Aã

?3⁄4

Iz

I}

Iv

Iv

Iz

Map 2-45

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Areas

Closed to Saleable Minerals

Alternative C

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Management Unit

Closed to Saleable Minerals
IB 

Union Calendar No. 13 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1070 

[Report No. 118–21] 

To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to provide the owner or operator 

of a critical energy resource facility an interim permit under subtitle 

C that is subject to final approval by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2023 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Additional sponsors: Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. CURTIS, and Mr. 

ALLEN

MARCH 23, 2023 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on February 17, 2023] 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1070 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to provide the owner 

or operator of a critical energy resource facility an interim permit under subtitle C that is subject to final 

approval by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1070 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INTERIM HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMITS. 

4 Section 3005(e) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 6925(e)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1)(A)— 

7 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

8 end; 

9 (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘or’’ after 

10 ‘‘this section,’’; 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(iii) is a critical energy resource facility,’’; 

13 and 

14 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(4) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this sub16 section: 

17 ‘‘(A) CRITICAL ENERGY RESOURCE.—The term 

18 ‘critical energy resource’ means, as determined by the 

19 Secretary of Energy, any energy resource— 

20 ‘‘(i) that is essential to the energy sector 

21 and energy systems of the United States; and 

22 ‘‘(ii) the supply chain of which is vulner23 able to disruption. 

24 ‘‘(B) CRITICAL ENERGY RESOURCE FACILITY.— 

25 The term ‘critical energy resource facility’ means a 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 1070 RH

1 facility that processes or refines a critical energy re2 source.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 13 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1070 

[Report No. 118–21] 

A BILL 

To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to provide 

and for other purposes. trator of the Environmental Protection Agency, that is subject to final approval by the Adminissource facility an interim permit under subtitle C the owner or operator of a critical energy reMARCH 23, 2023 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Form 10-QSB/A of MADISON EXPLORATIONS, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel
Haskins , Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: March 8, 2006


/s/ JOEL HASKINS
________________________________________
    Joel Haskins
    Chief Financial Officer and Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906,  HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO MADISON  EXPLORATIONS,  INC. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY MADISON  EXPLORATIONS,  INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Exhibit 10.1

 

SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST

 

Summary of Trustee Compensation

 

The following is a summary of the currently effective compensation of the Trustees of Senior Housing Properties Trust (the “Company”) for services as Trustees, which is subject to modification at any time by the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) or the Compensation Committee of the Board, as applicable.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee receives an annual fee of $40,000 for services as a Trustee, plus a fee of $1,250 for each meeting attended. Up to two $1,250 fees are paid if a Board meeting and one or more Board committee meetings, or two or more Board committee meetings, are held on the same date.

 

·                  Each Independent Trustee who serves as a committee chair of the Board’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Governance Committee receives an additional annual fee of $15,000, $10,000 and $10,000, respectively.

 

·                  The lead Independent Trustee receives an additional annual cash retainer fee of $12,500 for serving in this role.

 

·                  Each Trustee receives a grant of 3,000 of the Company’s common shares of beneficial interest on the date of the first Board meeting following each annual meeting of shareholders (or, for Trustees who are first elected or appointed at other times, on the day of the first Board meeting attended).

 

·                  The Company generally reimburses all Trustees for travel expenses incurred in connection with their duties as Trustees and for out of pocket costs incurred in connection with their attending certain continuing education programs.
#### *Smith and wife vs. Maxwell’s heirs.*

■’CHAKCEay

'Case 127,

Error to the Warren Circuit; Hsifinr P BkoAdnAX, Judge

*Guardians.*Mortgages> *Dower. ■ Disclaimer. Distribution. Decrees. Security.*

Guardian of infant dis■chlirirfCaPUt" slave testator had mortgagfor them5suTM ject to the * payment of the mortgage money and interest.

Such d ianbün^the widow of the testator, after claimed the right to hold the slave so *603“ ' ¿o^er^cannot hold him. as *snch,bat*as 6

*602October 25.

Judge Mills

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

It seems to the court that the right of redemption to the slave held, must, and did enure to the benefit of the estate of David Maxwell, deceased, when purchased by his widow, and that said slave is subject to distribution as part *of the*estate, allow-fog to the widow of the deceased, who was guardian ^he children, the price paid for the equity of redemption with its interest, whenever she and her present husband shall be impleaded and called upon by a proper bill for that purpose, to settle up said estate, 11 *1*1

And that said defendants below, the widow who was guardian, and her present husband, having denied, and disclaimed the right of holding said slave as dower, cannot hold him as a dower slave, or as c]aimetl in their answer, in their own right, but must be held to hold him as in her capacity as guardian.

And that this bill cannot be sustained as a bill to *603settle up tbe account of hire of Ned, without settling up the whole guardian’s accounts, and of course that the decree for hire is erroneous.

Billnotmaintainable for distribution in part.

Decree directed against ^im'^ahso]ute owner, and that sho a^¿iar" g¡ye security thatthc slave bo forthcoming.

C. *S. Bibb*for plaintiffs; *Barry*and *Bepaw*for defendants.

And all the relief to which the complainants can be entitled, is a security that the slave shall remain and be forthcoming for distribution, and as the defendants have claimed the absolute right of the slave, the chancellor who will control the conduct and management of guardians, ought to decree the title of the slave to the complainants, and to forever enjoin and restrain the defendants from removing or disposing of him, and to take the possession of the slave from the defendants, and cause him to be hired out, and managed by a commissioner and receiver, appointed under the control of the court, from time to time, unless the defendant Smith, husband of the widow, shall enter into bond with security, appointed by said court, to have said slave forthcoming at the time of distributing said estate among the complainants, and to account for bis past, and future hire, in *settling the accounts*as guardian.

—. . . , , , . JDecree reversed with costs, and cause remanded with directions for such decree and proceedings as shall not be inconsistent herewith.
#### HAACK, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN LABOR LYCEUM ASS’N, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 2, 1906.)

Action by Laura A. Haack against the Brooklyn Labor Lyceum Association, impleaded with others.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 23.4

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

We hereby consent
to the use of the name Collarini Associates and of references to Collarini Associates and to the inclusion of and references to our report, or information contained therein, dated 21stFebruary 2007, prepared for ATP Oil & Gas Corporation annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended 31stDecember 2006, and the incorporation by reference to the report prepared by Collarini Associates into ATP Oil & Gas Corporations
previously filed Registration Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-105699 and 333-121662) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-60762).



|                          
|--------------------------
|Collarini Associates      
|                          
|/s/ Mitchell C. Reece P.E.
|Mitchell C. Reece P.E.    
|Vice President            

23rdFebruary 2007