alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
u 

o u 

oo z 

o 

^^ 

. ^ ^ ' 

O 

o 

n> 

3 

ID 

a> -ts C/l 

Z 

U 

o 

< 

o 

^ <^ tr 

% 2> 

-ART;.^EMTOF 

• :..-r^ORTATIC;'! 

••,"TnTPAT10/:3 Brent R. Cole 

Law Offices of Marston & Cole, P.C. 

821 N Street, Suite 208 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

(907)277-8001 

Attorneys for Smith Cable Systems, Inc. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD 

XD W 

In the matter of: 

Smith Cable Systems, Inc. 

) 

) FAA Docket No. CP09AL00012 

) 

) DMS NO. FAA-2009-0976 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION FOR RESPONDENT'S 

CLOSING BRIEF 

Smith Cable Systems, Inc., by and through counsel, LAW OFFICES OF 

MARSTON & COLE, P.C, hereby moves the Board to extend the deadline for 

Respondent Smith Cable Systems, Inc.'s closing argument from June 10, 2011, to 

June 24, 2011. Additionally, the parties have agreed that the Administrator's reply brief 

will be due on July 15, 2011. Counsel for the Administrator has been contacted and does 

not oppose this motion. 

LAW OFFICES OF MARSTON & COLE, P.C. 

Attorneys for Smith Cable Systems, Inc. 

DATED: L h ^ LL 

:. Cole 

AK State Bar No. 8606074 

Unopposed Motion for Extension for Respondent's 

Closing Brief 

In re: Smith Cable Systems. Inc., DMS No. FAA-2009-0976 

Page I of2 
u 

O u 

O 

t/1 

.a 

o _ 

U 

o 

< 

O 

IT) 

0^ O — 

^ (^ Eir 

2 o f-r 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 

ORDER 

day of ,2011 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

This is to certify that on this MM. day of June. 2011. a 

true and correct copy of the foregoing document was 

1 5 Mailed 

• Hand-delivered 

g r Faxed 

to the following: 

Original and one copy: 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue. SW 

Washington. DC 20591 

One copy: 

Craig Wm. Black, Esq. 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

222 West 7th Avenue, #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

Fax; 271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings. M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

200 New Jersey Avenuej_S.E. 

Washington, 

Fax: 202-: 

Unopposed Motion for Extension for Respondent's 

Closing Brief 

In re: Smith Cable Systems. Inc., DMS No. FAA-2009-0976 

Page 2 of2
#### Van Vasiliades, Plaintiff, v City of New York et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Robert B. Samuels, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 831]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated October 22, 2002, which denied its motion to dismiss the third-party complaint on the grounds of laches and spoliation of evidence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

An action for indemnification such as the third-party action in this case, is an action at law *(see McDermott v City of New York,*50 NY2d 211, 217 n 2 [1980]). The doctrine of laches has no application to such an action at law (see *Roth v Black Star Publ. Co.,*302 AD2d 442, 443 [2003]).

Further, the appellant’s contention that a ladder the plaintiff borrowed from the third-party plaintiffs constituted a key piece of evidence which was lost *(cf. Kirkland v New York City Hous. Auth.,*236 AD2d 170, 173 [1997]) is based on pure speculation. In any event, the appellant failed to establish any intentional or negligent conduct on the part of the third-party plaintiffs *(see Kulhan v Minxray, Inc.,*255 AD2d 364 [1998]). Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 39 (Tuesday, March 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 12198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Literature 
Selection Technical Review Committee. The meeting is devoted to the 
review and evaluation of journals for potential indexing by the 
National Library of Medicine and will be closed to the public in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(9)(B), 
Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. Premature disclosure of the titles of the 
journals as potential titles to be indexed by the National Library of 
Medicine, the discussions, and the presence of individuals associated 
with these publications could significantly frustrate the review and 
evaluation of individual journals.

    Name of Committee: Literature Selection Technical Review 
Committee.
    Date: June 24-25, 2021.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate journals as potential titles to 
be indexed by the National Library of Medicine.
    Place: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Dianne Babski, Associate Director, Division of 
Library Operations, National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville 
Pike, Building 38, Room 2W04A, Bethesda, MD 20894, 301-827-4729, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e0c0f0c1d05070a2e030f07024000070640090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8eecefecfde5e7eacee3efe7e2a0e0e7e6a0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any member of the public may submit written comments no later 
than 15 days after the meeting. Any interested person may file 
written comments with the committee by forwarding the statement to 
the Contact Person listed on this notice. The statement should 
include the name, address, telephone number and when applicable, the 
business or professional affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

     Dated: February 24, 2021.
Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,
Program Analyst,Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-04230 Filed 3-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Catherine Park, Respondent, v. Arthur Hoffman et al., Appellants.

—Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 1, 1966, reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless within 30 days after entry of the order hereon plaintiff shall serve and file a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict in her favor from $54,500 to $34,500 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive to the extent indicated. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32-3

              Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18 United States Code

         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
     Form 10-Q of Commonwealth Edison Company for the quarterly period ended
     September 30, 2003, that (i) the report fully complies with the
     requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Commonwealth Edison Company.


     Date:  October 29, 2003                  /s/ Michael B. Bemis
                                              --------------------
                                              Michael B. Bemis
                                              President
                                              Exelon Energy Delivery
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Gregg Appliances, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald J.B. Van der Wiel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Donald J.B. Van der WielDonald J.B. Van der WielChief Financial Officer




Dated: February 14,
2006
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Patterns of Foster Care Placement and Family Reunification following Child Maltreatment Investigations      

# Report: Patterns of Foster Care Placement and Family Reunification following Child Maltreatment Investigations

This brief identifies characteristics of children and families who reunified with parents or family following the child’s stay in foster care, patterns regarding success or failure of reunification, and maltreatment re-reports among children reunified with their families.

http://aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/patterns-foster-care-placement-and-family-reunification-following-child-maltreatment-investigations?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports
819.708 Contract clauses. ( b ) The contracting officer shall insert clause 852.219-70, Small Business Subcontracting Plan Minimum Requirements, in solicitations and contracts that include FAR clause 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21E0021. IN RE A. B., A CHILD (MOTHER).

Pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 40 (b), the mother of A. B. has filed an

emergency motion requesting a thirty (30) day extension of time to file an application

for discretionary appeal in this matter. The mother’s motion is hereby GRANTED.

The application for discretionary appeal shall be filed no later than January 15, 2021.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 15, 2020

12/15/2020
# AMERICAN AIRLINES

December 14, 2010

Paul L. Gretch Director, Office of International Aviation Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: 30-Day Notice of American Airlines of Additional Codesharing with Cathay Pacific (DOT-OST-2000-6824)

Dear Mr. Gretch:

American Airlines, Inc., under condition (b) of Notice of Action Taken issued in this docket on January 8, 2003, herebyprovides notice that, no sooner than 30 days from today, American will display the CX* code of Cathay Pacific Airways, Ltd. on the following American-operated flights:

New York (JFK) – Sao Paulo (GRU)

New York (JFK) – Rio de Janeiro (GIG)

Respectfully submitted,

______________________ Carl B. Nelson Associate General Counsel American Airlines, Inc.
1101 17 th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5647
carl.nelson@aa.com

cc: Docket Branch Service list**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the following persons:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dlalaw.com
scott.mcclain@delta.com bill@mietuslaw.com sametta.c.barnett@delta.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com kquinn@pillsburywinthrop.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com bkeiner@crowell.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com
esahr@eckertseamons.com mcmillin@woa.com bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.com eskraft@jamhoff.com jeffrey.manley@united.com dpdean@jamhoff.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com dkirstein@yklaw.com robert.land@jetblue.com jyoung@yklaw.com msinick@ssd.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov cdonley@ssd.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil gbleopard@fedex.com john.allen@faa.gov dvaughan@kelleydrye.com urskr@state.gov kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com recohn@hhlaw.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com lhalloway@crowell.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com efaberman@wileyrein.com lachter@starpower.net
mroller@rollerbauer.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com howard.kass@usairways.com rpommer@atlasair.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com gmurphy@crowell.com sophy.chen@hklaw.com russell.bailey@alpa.org
david.heffernan@wilmerhale.com esahr@eckertseamons.com

_______________________________ CARL B. NELSON

December 14, 2010
# ^.40-c?i-tt*^-c?i'

TO: CLERK OF THE COURT OF 12/23/2014 CRIMINAL APPEALS P 0 BOX 12303 CAPITAL STATION 

### AUSTIN, TEXAS. 787.il REr FILING DATES / NUMBERS / OUTCOMES OF C-3 0008220-0926958&-B-C-D-S~F-G-H WR~65-469--01~02~03-04-05-06~07-08
DEAR CLERK, 

### PLEASE WOULD YOU GIVE ME THE DATE3_NUMBERS_AND OUT-COE'lES OF THE ABOVE CITrJD AND REQUESTED CASES ? THANK YOU KINDLY FOR YOUR TIME, AND PATIENCE. SINCERLY,


# fS- it s^d <x.

;PERSONAL FILE PAKE LOUIS BENNER #1278531 * 2101 FM 369 Nth ALLRED UNIT I IOWA PARK, TEXAS 

# j 76367-6563 PS IF AT .ALL POSSIBLE COULD I PLEASE GET THE ORDER THAT WAS ISSUED FOR 0925958H 

# RECEIVEDIN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS JAN 0 52015 AbelAcosta, Clerk
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit** ___________________________ No. 14-1221 ___________________________ Charles A. Sisson; Maralee M. Sisson lllllllllllllllllllll Appellant s v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue lllllllllllllllllllll Appellee ____________ Appeal from The United States Tax Court

____________ Submitted: October 17, 2014 Filed: October 24, 2014 [Unpublished] ____________ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Charles and Maralee Sisson appeal from an order of the Tax Court 1 denying their motion for leave to file a motion to correct purporte d inaccuracies in a hearing transcript. After careful review, we find no basis for reversal, given that the specific 1 The Honorable Robert N. Armen, Jr., United States Tax Court Judge.relief the Sissons seek could not have any effect on the matters at issue in this case. SeeDoe v. Nixon , 716 F.3d 1041, 1051 (8th Cir. 2013) (noting that a federal court does not have authority to give opinions on moot questions or abstract propositions that cannot affect the matter at issue in the case before it). Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________ -2-
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           America's Young Adults: Special Issue, 2014      

# America's Young Adults: Special Issue, 2014

This special report on young adults in the United States, ages 18-24, includes data from nationally representative, federally sponsored surveys. Data are summarized under five key themes: education; economic circumstances; family formation; civic, social, and personal behavior; and health and safety. 

http://childstats.gov/americaschildren/index.asp?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
#### In the Matter of Bernard Johnson, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 639]

*902Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits the possession of a weapon after a 71⁄2-inch sharpened weapon was found secreted in a vent hole in petitioner’s locker. Although petitioner argues that the cell was not searched in accordance with departmental directives when he moved into it 51⁄2 months earlier, this is insufficient to overcome the reasonable inference of possession which arises from the fact that the weapon was discovered in an area within petitioner’s control *(see Matter of Colon v Goord,*274 AD2d 732 [2000]; *Matter of Tarbell v Goord,*263 AD2d 563, 563-564 [1999]), particularly given the length of time that petitioner was living in the cell *(see Matter of Torres v Coughlin,*213 AD2d 861 [1995]; *cf. Matter of Varela v Coughlin,*203 AD2d 630 [1994]). This inference, together with the misbehavior report and testimony from the correction officer who authored the report indicating that the tape covering the vent hole was in good condition, provide substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt *(see Matter of Shackleford v Goord,*3 AD3d 622 [2004]). Furthermore, contrary to petitioner’s assertion, petitioner’s prior disciplinary record was considered in imposing the penalty and not in determining his guilt *(see Matter of Amaker v Senkowski,*278 AD2d 622 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 707 [2001]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
I, Richard R. Schreiber, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Chief Consolidated Mining Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 19, 2007


/s/ Richard R. Schreiber
Richard R. Schreiber
Chief Financial Officer


---