alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
926.7005 Preferences under the Energy Policy Act. ( a ) *Prime contracts.* Solicitations for all competitive Energy Policy Act procurements not for 8(a) firms and in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold shall provide for an evaluation preference for offers received from entities from among the Energy Policy Act target groups. The evaluation criteria shall provide that in instances in which two or more proposals being considered for final selection are ranked as essentially equal after consideration of all technical and cost evaluation factors, and if one of these proposals is from an offeror from among an Energy Policy Act target group that offeror will be selected for award.
( b ) *Subcontracts.* ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall assure that all competitive Energy Policy Act solicitations over the simplified acquisition threshold contain— ( i ) A solicitation provision providing for consideration of the extent to which the offerors have provided for subcontracting opportunities to entities from among the Energy Policy Act target groups; and
( ii ) A clause providing for the maximum utilization of entities from among Energy Policy Act target groups in the performance of Energy Policy Act contracts.
( 2 ) In addition, the contracting officer shall assure that all competitive Energy Policy Act procurements expected to exceed $500,000 ($1,000,000 for construction) include a clause for reporting after award as part of the Small Business and Small Disadvantaged Business Subcontracting Plan process.
[60 FR 22300, May 5, 1995, as amended at 75 FR 69013, Nov. 10, 2010]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Waverly Lindsey and Alfonso Norris, Appellants.

Appeal by each of two named defendants from a judgment of the County Court, Richmond County, rendered April 8, 1960 after a jury trial, convicting him of (1) felonious sale of a narcotic drug on October 4, 1958 to one Sidney Shepard (Penal Law, § 1751); (2) felonious possession of a narcotic drug with intent to sell on October 4, 1958 (Penal Law, § 1751, subd. 2); (3) unlawful possession of a narcotic drug on October 4, 1958 as a misdemeanor (Penal Law, § 1751-a); and (4) conspiracy to illegally possess and sell to said Sidney Shepard on October 4, 1958, a quantity of marijuana, as a misdemeanor (Penal Law, § 580), and imposing sentence. As to each defendant, judgment reversed on the law and the facts, indictment dismissed, and bail exonerated. The defendants’ conviction rests on a single sale of a narcotic drug. The principal evidence as to the sale was given by a police officer who had disguised his real identity and had induced defendants to introduce him to one Isador Littman, the seller of the drug. Prom the proof adduced, it clearly appears that defendants acted as agents for such police officer and received no financial profit from the single sale involving only $5 allegedly made in concert with said Littman (who was originally a codefendant, but who pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of the narcotic drug and hence was not tried with the defendants-appellants). We find no proof that defendants were in any way associated or connected with Littman, the seller, in a common scheme or plan. Under the circumstances, the learned trial court should have applied the rule that one who acts solely as the agent of the buyer cannot he convicted of the crime of selling narcotics, and should have granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss the indictment *(People*v. *Branch,*13 A D 2d 714; *People*v. *Buster,*286 App. Div. 1141; *United States*v. *Sawyer,*210 P. 2d 169; *United States*v. *Moses,*220 P. 2d 166). Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm, with the following memorandum: Whether defendants were the agents of the seller as *806
      *the People*contend, *or*the agents of the buyer as defendants contend, was a question of fact decided by the jury against the defendants. In my opinion, from the evidence adduced, the jury was free to find that defendants were the agents of the seller. As to defendant Lindsey, the proof showed that, immediately prior to the consummation of the sale by Littman (the seller) to the police on October 4,1958, Lindsey said that Littman had good stuff, that he guaranteed it, that it was *“*good gunga,” and that he could get *“*pot ” for them any time they wanted it. As to defendant Norris, the proof showed that on October 3, 1958, he brought the police officer to Liftman’s house; and that the next day he (Norris) again brought the officer to Littman and induced Littman to sell the narcotic drug to the officer after a private conversation between them. This evidence was sufficient to present a question of fact for the jury as to both defendants.
#### 908.7117 Tabulating machine cards.

DOE offices shall acquire tabulating machine cards in accordance with FPMR 41 CFR 101-26.509.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 19

- 00265

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant

v.
JONATHAN ADAM RIVERA , Appellee

From the County Court Limestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 39084

A B A T E M E N T ORDER

The State moves to abate this appeal and to remand to the trial court for entry of
findings of fact and conclusions of law. The State requested findings of fact and
conclusions of law after the trial court granted Defendant Jonathan Adam Rivera’s
motion to suppress. Although approximately two months have passed since the State
filed its request, the trial court has not e ntered findings of fact and conclusions of law.
When the losing party on a motion to suppress requests findings of fact and
conclusions of law, the trial court must issue them in order for the court of appeals toState v. Rivera Page 2

properly review the trial court’s ruling. State v. Oages , 210 S.W.3d 643, 644 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2006); State v. Cullen , 195 S.W.3d 696, 698

- 99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
We grant the State’s motion to abate. This appeal is abated to enable the trial court
to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the granting of Rivera’s motion

to suppress. The trial court shall, within twenty (20) days from the date of this order: (1) make
appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (2) deliver the findings of fact

and conclusions of law t o the trial court clerk.
The trial court clerk shall: (1) prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the
findings of fact and conclusions of law that the trial court renders; and (2) file the
supplemental clerk’s record with the Clerk of this Cou rt within forty

- five (45) days after

the date of this order.
The Appellant’s brief will be due thirty (30) days after the supplemental clerk’s
record is filed. The Appellee’s brief will be due thirty (30) days after the Appellant’s brief

is filed.

PER CURIAM

B efore Chief Justice Gray , Justice Davis , and Justice Neill Motion granted; case abated and remanded Or der issued and filed October 2, 2019 RWR
Record	of	Conversation

At 1500 today, August 26, 2013, Mr. Dennis Manibusan was contacted by phone in an attempt to 

contact Mr. Charles D. Hobgood in regards to FAA docket number FAA-2012-1255. Mr. Manibusan 

explained that Mr. Hobgood no longer worked with Air Transport International, Inc. (ATI), and that he 

(Mr. Manibusan) is the new president of ATI. In addition, Mr. Manibusan was asked if the address on 

the Docket was correct, and he stated it was not correct and should update the address to 145 Hunter 

Drive, Wilmington, OH 45177.

Mr. Manibusan was informed the purpose of the call was to discuss the regulations ATI requested an 

exemption from (§§121.613, 121.619 and 121.625) and that §121.619 did not apply to ATI, as ATI was a 

Supplemental Air Carrier. Mr. Manibusan confirmed his understanding the exemption from that section 

was unnecessary.

Nothing Follows 

___________________________________________________________________________

Adam Giraldes

Aviation Safety Inspector

AFS-220- Air Carrier Operations Branch

Air Transportation Division

Office: 817-350-4564
915.305 Proposal evaluation. ( d ) Personnel from DOE, other Government agencies, consultants, and contractors, including those who manage or operate Government-owned facilities, may be used in the evaluation process as evaluators or advisors when their services are necessary and available. When personnel outside the Government, including those of contractors who operate or manage Government-owned facilities, are to be used as evaluators or advisors, approval and nondisclosure procedures as required by 915.207-70 shall be followed and a notice of the use of non-Federal evaluators shall be included in the solicitation. In all instances, such personnel will be required to comply with DOE conflict of interest and nondisclosure requirements.
[63 FR 56851, Oct. 23, 1998, as amended at 76 FR 7692, Feb. 11, 2011]
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T19:55:50-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Adams , Kevi n (OST ) ^ 

## (.<:'

- y - ^ e

From : Sent : To : Subject : Chanc e Olive r[chancemoliver@ymail.com ] Friday , Novembe r04 , 201 1 7:0 6 P M EA S (OST ) For t Dodge , Iow a EA S carrie r wmmma^Ki^Kfm m ^;ATi i 

## V^

- Uc.>^^ ,

T o who mi

t ma y concern , My nam e i s Ji mI hav e live di n Burlington , Iow am

y entir e lif

e an da s suc h I hav e see n airline s com e an dgo . Mos t

recentl y I watche dth e departur e o f Grea t Lake s Airline s an dth e arriva l o f thei r replacemen t

Ai r Choic e On e Airlines . Whe n Grea t Lake s firs t

arrive di n Burlingto n thei r

presenc e wa s welcome . The y wer e sol d t o b e acheap mean s o f

transportatio n t o multipl e locations . I t di dno t tak e lon g fo r

th e Airpor t

Directo r an dfor th e communit y t o realiz e th e forme r o f thes e tw o point s wa s i

n n o wa y true . Th e firs t

tim e I flew t o Kansa s City Internationa l Airport

wit h Great Lake s Airline s i

t cos t m e nearl y $40 0 an dth e entir e wa y ther e th e plan e wa s empty (thi s include dconnectin g throug h tw o cities) . I t wa s obviou s that

Great Lake s wa s no t

concerne dwit

h fillin g th e aircraf

t the y wer e worrie dabou t th e subsid y money . But

I digres s I d o no t

wis h t o smear

Great Lakes, m y intentio n i s t o complimen t Ai r Choic e On e Airlines . Sinc e AC O ha s bee n i n Burlingto n the y hav e increase d Trom4ii p t o 5 flight s pe r day du e t o popularity . I wor k i n Chicag o an dtl y ther e onc e pe r week neve r hav e I flow n t o o r

returne dfro mChicago an dha dfewe r than 6 peopl e alon g sid e me o n th e 8 seat Cessn aGran d Carava n (208B) . I understan dthat th e publi c ha s som e misconception s concernin g singl e engin e aircraf t bu t th e rid e o n aGran dCarava n i s on e o f i f no t th e mos t smooth ride s I'v e eve r

bee n o n an dth e pilot s an dstaf f ar e ver y professiona l an dquickl y offe r t o remed y an dissue s yo u may encounter . My poin t i s Ai r Choic e On e i s a wonderfu l ai r

carrie r with incredibl y helpfu l staf f an dgrea t

plane s (200 4 Cessn aCaravan' s a s oppose dt o 199 1 Beech-craf

t 1900D) . I

f th e nee dfo r

mor e flight s arise s i n Fort Dodg e I' mcertai n tha

t Ai r Choic e On e woul db e willin g t o mak e mor e flight s available . With fare s lik e AC O charge s I' mals o willin g t o be t that For t Dodg e woul dse e it s enplanement s g o fa r up . Als o conside r

th e advantage s t o flyin g t o Chicago' s O'Har e Internationa l Airport on e o f th e busies t

airport s i n th e worl dwith thousand s o f connectin g flight s daily .
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Broadband Access Resources 
            -           Broadband Access Resources for Individuals and Families      

# Broadband Access Resources for Individuals and Families

## What Service Do You Need?

Funding is available to provide different types of connectivity for individuals and families. The two main categories of funding include access to broadband (internet services) or access to equipment/devices. Many federal funding streams provide funds for both of these categories.

The **BROADBAND** category includes services such as:
                  - Broadband services
                  - Voice and data services
                  - Data transmission services
                  - Internet access
                  - Internal connections

The **EQUIPMENT & DEVICES** category includes services such as:
                  - Network equipment (i.e., routers, wireless controller systems, cabling, software, etc.)
                  - Distance learning equipment (i.e., laptops, tablets)

*<< Back to **Broadband Access Resources — Who are You?** page*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1155 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1155

  To prohibit the phase out of gasoline and prevent higher prices for 
                   consumers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 24, 2023

Mr. Crenshaw (for himself, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Pence, Mr. Joyce of 
  Pennsylvania, Mr. Carter of Georgia, and Mr. Duncan) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the phase out of gasoline and prevent higher prices for 
                   consumers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping America's Refineries Act''.

SEC. 2. NO MANDATORY ASSESSMENT OF SAFER TECHNOLOGY AND ALTERNATIVE 
              RISK MANAGEMENT MEASURES REQUIRED WITH RESPECT TO THE USE 
              OF HYDROFLUORIC ACID IN CERTAIN ALKYLATION UNITS.

    (a) In General.--The owner or operator of a stationary source 
described in subsection (b) of this section shall not be required by 
the regulations promulgated under section 112(r)(7)(B) of the Clean Air 
Act (42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(7)(B)) to include in any hazard assessment under 
clause (ii) of such section 112(r)(7)(B) an assessment of safer 
technology and alternative risk management measures with respect to the 
use of hydrofluoric acid in an alkylation unit.
    (b) Stationary Source Described.--A stationary source described in 
this subsection is a stationary source (as defined in section 
112(r)(2)(C) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7412(r)(2)(C)) in North 
American Industry Classification System code 324--
            (1) for which a construction permit or operating permit has 
        been issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et 
        seq.); or
            (2) for which the owner or operator demonstrates to the 
        Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency that such 
        stationary source conforms or will conform to the most recent 
        version of American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice 
        751.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1007.86 Deduction for marketing services.

See § 1000.86.
Exhibit 99-1

Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code
----
         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Exelon Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003,
that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Exelon Corporation.


Date:  May 2, 2003                       /s/ John W. Rowe
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         John W. Rowe
                                         Chairman, President and
                                         Chief Executive Officer
EX-32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the annual report of Twin Lakes,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission in February 2006 (the "Report"),  I, Kirk M.
Warshaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Kirk M. Warshaw
-----------------------------
Kirk M. Warshaw
Chief Financial Officer
February 27, 2006

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
BULLETIN 1028 PLATE 30
EXPLANATION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
[ Qas Qb | Qd
Surficial deposits
Ach-soil cover, Qas; beach deposite, Qb;
dunes (largely voleanic ash) Qd
UNCONFORMITY
Lavas and pyroclastic Intrusive rocks
Geposits Andesite or basalt dikes,
Predominantly lava and Ta Intrusion 0,
flow breceia, but includes porphyritic andesite,
‘minor pyroclastic depoxita, Fregular shape, with
Tvl; predominantly pyro- feldspar and hornble
dastic deposite (tuff and ‘conspicuous, Tpi
breccia), but includes
minor ‘sedimentary rocks,
lava, and flow breccia,
Tvp; lava and pyroclastic
deposits undifferentiated,
Tvu, on untraversed coast”
line
Contact
Dashed where approximately located, dotted
where concealed
ce)
25
Strike and dip of beds
7°45
a
si al iz
bo, at El ie
00" , 5| |g
= 1
S| e
2| /2
E] je
2
F
O
APPROXIMATE MEAN
DECLINATION 1949
ISLAND
i Peau sons 37730" 35/00" INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, BE iapeiaen
opcgraphy and hyarography from U.S. Coast Geology by R. E. Wilcox and R. A. Robie, 1952
Scale 1:25, fan ee : ais
Contour interval 50 feet with supplementary

contours at 25-foot intervals
Datum ie mean sea level

Hydrographic contours in fathome

is mean lower low water
‘Shoreline is line of mean high water

Dotted line shows limit of partly exposed rock bench

QUATERNARY

TERTIARY
9904.402-60 Illustrations. ( a ) Illustrations of costs which are incurred for the same purpose: ( 1 ) Contractor normally allocates all travel as an indirect cost and previously disclosed this accounting practice to the Government. For purposes of a new proposal, contractor intends to allocate the travel costs of personnel whose time is accounted for as direct labor directly to the contract. Since travel costs of personnel whose time is accounted for as direct labor working on other contracts are costs which are incurred for the same purpose, these costs may no longer be included within indirect cost pools for purposes of allocation to any covered Government contract. Contractor's Disclosure Statement must be amended for the proposed changes in accounting practices.
( 2 ) Contractor normally allocates planning costs indirectly and allocates this cost to all contracts on the basis of direct labor. A proposal for a new contract requires a disproportionate amount of planning costs. The contractor prefers to continue to allocate planning costs indirectly. In order to equitably allocate the total planning costs, the contractor may use a method for allocating all such costs which would provide an equitable distribution to all final cost objectives. For example, he may use the number of planning documents processed rather than his former allocation base of direct labor. Contractor's Disclosure Statement must be amended for the proposed changes in accounting practices.
( b ) Illustrations of costs which are not incurred for the same purpose: ( 1 ) Contractor normally allocates special tooling costs directly to contracts. The costs of general purpose tooling are normally included in the indirect cost pool which is allocated to contracts. Both of these accounting practices were previously disclosed to the Government. Since both types of costs involved were not incurred for the same purpose in accordance with the criteria set forth in the Contractor's Disclosure Statement, the allocation of general purpose tooling costs from the indirect cost pool to the contract, in addition to the directly allocated special tooling costs, is not considered a violation of the standard.
( 2 ) Contractor proposes to perform a contract which will require three firemen on 24-hour duty at a fixed-post to provide protection against damage to highly inflammable materials used on the contract. Contractor presently has a firefighting force of 10 employees for general protection of the plant. Contractor's costs for these latter firemen are treated as indirect costs and allocated to all contracts; however, he wants to allocate the three fixed-post firemen directly to the particular contract requiring them and also allocate a portion of the cost of the general firefighting force to the same contract. He may do so but only on condition that his disclosed practices indicate that the costs of the separate classes of firemen serve different purposes and that it is his practice to allocate the general firefighting force indirectly and to allocate fixed-post firemen directly.
#### BLANDY et al., Respondents, v. VANDERBILT et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by Graham F. Blandy and others agamst William K. Vanderbilt and others. W. B. Hornblower, for appellants. A. B. Parker, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed,