alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SICUREZZA, Respondent, v. CRISANTI, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March 26, 1906.)

Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term. Action by Grazia Sicurezza against Salvatore Crisanti. From a. judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the same,, defendant appeals.

Reversed, and motion granted.

Charles E. Le Barbier, for appellant.

Edward J. Kelly, for respondent.

O’GORMAN, J.

The action is for slander, and on defendant’s alleged default the damages-were assessed at $2,000. After the entry of judgment and issuance of execution, the defendant moved to set aside the judgment 'on the-ground that the summons was never served upon him. The learned justice at Special Term denied this application, but from an examination of the papers we entertain such a serious-doubt as to whether the summons was served that in our opinion the ends of justice will be best served by granting the motion, and thus-give the defendant an opportunity to have his-day in court. Order reversed, and motion granted, with $10 costs to the defendant. All concur.
#### WOOD, Respondent, v. WOOD, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Deartment.

March 16, 1906.)

Action by Annie *V.*Wood against Lorenzo Wood.

No opinion, irder affirmed, with $10 costs and disburselents.
#### Elna Samuelson, appellee, v. City of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 34,424.

Opinion filed April 15, 1931.

Samuel A. Ettelson, Corporation Counsel, and William D. Saltiel, City Attorney, for appellant; Matilda Fenberg, Assistant City Attorney, and Roy S. Gaskill, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel.

Murphy O. Tate and Lloyd T. Bailey, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Friend

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### In the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation. Catherine Oken, as Executrix of Edwin Diedrich, Deceased, Respondent, v. A.C. & S. et al., Defendants, and Robert A. Keasbey Company, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 253]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen E. Freedman, J.), entered November 6, 2003, which denied defendant Keasbey Company’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs decedent, who died in 2003, contracted mesothelioma allegedly from exposure to asbestos-laden dust from as early as the 1960s, while employed as an ironworker. He asserted claims for negligence and strict products liability against Keasbey, a commercial and industrial insulation subcontractor that has acknowledged having sold or distributed insulation materials that contained asbestos. The summary judgment motion was grounded on the absence of any evidence in the record that it ever sold or distributed any asbestos-containing products specifically used at a work site where decedent was employed.

Keasbey challenges the motion court’s consideration of proof that would be inadmissible at trial, including deposition testimony offered in other unrelated cases and unauthenticated hearsay invoices and records. However, evidence otherwise excludable at trial may be considered in opposition to a motion for summary judgment as long as it does not become the sole basis for the court’s determination *(Navedo v 250 Willis Ave. Supermarket,*290 AD2d 246, 247 [2002]). This Court has noted, in prior asbestos litigation, that “[w]hile defendant’s own failure, in the first instance, to unequivocally establish that its product could not have contributed to the causation of plaintiffs injury would have required denial of its motion for summary judgment [citation omitted], here plaintiffs papers identified specific brands of the subject asbestos products, including those of defendant, in use at the relevant work site during the rele*286vant time, showed, that various asbestos products were interchangeable in the work site at the time, and showed that he was heavily exposed to asbestos dust at that site during that time. The plaintiff is not required to show the precise causes of his damages, but only to show facts and conditions from which defendant’s liability may be reasonably inferred” *(Reid v Georgia-Pacific Corp.,*212 AD2d 462, 463 [1995]).

Plaintiff has presented sufficient evidence, not all of which is hearsay, to warrant a trial. We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Lerner, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1105 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1105

     To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to 
 reauthorize the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 2023

Mrs. Wagner (for herself, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Hunt, Ms. Jackson Lee, and Mr. 
    Cline) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to 
 reauthorize the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debbie Smith Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 2(j) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 
(34 U.S.C. 40701(j)) is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2019 through 
2024'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2024 through 2029''.
                                 <all>
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Public/Private Ventures' Evaluation of Faith-Based Programs      

# Public/Private Ventures' Evaluation of Faith-Based Programs

This factsheet reports the initial findings of a demonstration project to observe faith-based organizations providing services to at-risk youth. The project hopes to foster better connections between these organizations and other institutions.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/fs200138.pdf
#### § 1007.11 [Reserved]
#### 852.249-70 Termination for Default—Supplement for Mortuary Services.

As prescribed in 849.504-70, insert the following clause:

# Termination for Default—Supplement for Mortuary Services (MAY 2020)

The FAR clause entitled Default (Fixed-Price Supply and Service), at 52.249-8, is supplemented as follows:

The Contracting Officer may terminate this contract for default by written notice without the ten-day notice required by paragraph (a)(2) of the Default clause if—

(a) The Contractor, through circumstances reasonably within its control or that of its employees, performs any act under or in connection with this contract, or fails in the performance of any service under this contract and the act or failures may reasonably be considered to reflect discredit upon the Department of Veteran Affairs in fulfilling its responsibility for proper care of remains;

(b) The Contractor, or its employees, solicits relatives or friends of the deceased to purchase supplies or services not under this contract. (The Contractor may furnish supplies or arrange for services not under this contract, only if representatives of the deceased voluntarily request, select, and pay for them.);

(c) The services or any part of the services are performed by anyone other than the Contractor or the Contractor's employees without the written authorization of the Contracting Officer;

(d) The Contractor refuses to perform the services required for any particular remains; or

(e) The Contractor mentions or otherwise uses this contract in its advertising in any way.

(End of clause)

[85 FR 36349, June 16, 2020]
Opinion issued July 26, 2012.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-11-01039-CV

———————————

KENDRICK EDWARDS, Appellant

V.

SAHIAT CORP., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 997533

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kendrick Edwards, has neither paid the required filing fee for this 

appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must 

pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by 
2

statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing 

indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), 

§.51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), §.101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of 

appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and 

the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. 

A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was due November 28, 

2011. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did 

not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) 

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

In addition, the county clerk has notified the Court that appellant has neither

paid nor made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk=s record. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due 

to appellant’s fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, 

appellant did not respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary 

dismissal).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Massengale.
#### 801.604 Contracting Officer`s Representative (COR).

When the contracting officer intends to designate a Contracting Officer's Representative for a solicitation or contract, the contracting officer must include the clause in 852. 201-70, Contracting Officer`s Representative, in the solicitation and contract.
#### 709.503 Waiver.

For purposes of approving waivers or further delegating the authority to approve waivers pursuant to (48 CFR) FAR 9.503, the M/OAA Director is the agency head (see (48 CFR) AIDAR 701.601(a)(1)). The M/OAA Director hereby delegates the authority to approve waivers pursuant to (48 CFR) FAR 9.503 to the heads of USAID contracting activities, as defined in (48 CFR) AIDAR 702.170.

[64 FR 42042, Aug. 3, 1999, as amended at 72 FR 19670, Apr. 19, 2007; 79 FR 74988, 74992, Dec. 16, 2014]
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00512-CR
Patrick Uzomba, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2041861, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Patrick Uzomba seeks to ap peal from a judgment of conviction for possession of cocaine. The trial court has certified, and the record confirms, that this is a plea bargain case and Uzomba has no right of appeal. S ee Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The appeal is dismissed. S ee id
. rule 25.2(d).

__________________________________________ Bob Pemberton, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: September 23, 2004 Do Not Publish
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Report: Characteristics of Private Schools in the United States: Results from the 2015–16 Private School Universe Survey

This report provides select findings from the 2015–16 Private School Universe Survey to describe school size, school level, religious orientation, association membership, geographic region, community type, and program emphasis. 

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017073&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Report
#### § 1.216 If I serve a subpoena, must I also submit information in accordance with § 1.214?

Yes. A subpoena shall be served in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or applicable state procedure, as appropriate. If you serve a subpoena, including a subpoena *duces tecum,* together with the subpoena you must also submit information in accordance with § 1.214. If you serve a subpoena on the Department or a Department employee before submitting information in accordance with § 1.214 of this subpart, the Department may oppose the subpoena on the grounds that you failed to follow the requirements of this subpart.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           OK2TALK: Help for Youth      

# OK2TALK: Help for Youth

Developed by the National Association of Broadcasters and featured on MentalHealth.gov, OK2TALK is a new campaign that aims to encourage young people struggling with mental health challenges to talk about their experiences, without fear of stigma, and to create opportunities for open conversations in schools, in the workplace, and among families about mental health. The campaign includes TV and radio PSAs and an online community where youth can share their story by submitting creative content. 

http://ok2talk.org/
#### § 1005.70 Producer-settlement fund.

See § 1000.70.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Federal Resource Center for Special Education      

# Federal Resource Center for Special Education

The Federal Resource Center for Special Education supports the work of the six OSEP-funded Regional Resource Centers (RRCs) that provide technical assistance (TA) to assist states in complying with IDEA and to implement evidence-based educational practices.

http://www.rrcprogram.org/cms2/
#### Eleanor S. Martin, Plaintiff, v Marsha Feltingoff et al., Defendants. Law Office of James J. Killerlane, Nonparty Appellant; Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman & Mackauf, Nonparty Respondent.

[777 NYS2d 476]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered October 21, 2003, which apportioned 75% of the contingency fee to plaintiffs incoming attorneys, and the 25% remainder to the outgoing attorney, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The incoming attorneys got the case mediation-ready and trial-ready by preparing and developing the damages portion, specifically, plaintiff’s extensive emotional and psychological injuries arising from a horrific accident in which an out-of-control motor vehicle struck her as she dined inside a restaurant. Although the outgoing attorney may have devoted more hours to the case, time spent is just one of a number of factors to be considered in apportioning the fee. Others include quality of service and the contributions of the respective attorneys toward achieving the outcome *(Board of Mgrs. of Boro Park Vil.-Phase I Condominium v Boro Park Townhouse Assoc.,*284 AD2d 237*468[2001]), as well as the experience, ability and reputation of the attorneys *(Ebrahimian v Long Is. R.R.,*269 AD2d 488 [2000]). Here, the quality of the incoming attorneys’ work was of far greater significance in reaching the $1.9 million settlement. Concur—Tom, J.P., Ellerin, Williams and Marlow, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002), I, the Chief Executive Officer of Northstar Ventures,
Inc. (the 'Company"), hereby certify, that to the best of my knowledge, the
annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2003

/s/ Dempsey Mork
- --------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002), I, the Chief Financial Officer of Northstar Ventures,
Inc. (the 'Company"), hereby certify, that to the best of my knowledge, the
annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2003

/s/Norbert LeBoeuf
- --------------------------------
Norbert LeBoeuf, Chief Financial Officer