alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Behavioral Threat Assessment in Schools: Evidence, Fit, and Appropriateness      

# Report: Behavioral Threat Assessment in Schools: Evidence, Fit, and Appropriateness

This report (PDF, 40 pages) explores the intersection of behavioral threat assessment (BTA) and youth mental health. This report aims to: 
                  -  Describe the problem of school violence and how BTA became a widely implemented school violence prevention strategy  
                  -  Report on the current state of BTA implementation and its effectiveness  
                  -  Discuss considerations for the fit and appropriateness of using BTA in schools  
                  -  Offer recommendations for schools, policymakers, funders, researchers, and SAMHSA on addressing BTA use in schools  

**Learn more.**
§ 1.328 Sanctions. ( a ) The ALJ may sanction a person, including any party or representative for: ( 1 ) Failing to comply with a lawful order, subpoena, or procedure;
( 2 ) Failing to prosecute or defend an action; or
( 3 ) Engaging in other misconduct that interferes with the speedy, orderly, or fair conduct of the hearing.
( b ) Any such sanction, including but not limited to those listed in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this section, shall reasonably relate to the severity and nature of the failure or misconduct.
( c ) When a party fails to comply with a subpoena or an order, including an order for taking a deposition, the production of evidence within the party's control, or a request for admission, the ALJ may: ( 1 ) Draw an inference in favor of the requesting party with regard to the information sought;
( 2 ) In the case of requests for admission, deem admitted each item as to which an admission is requested;
( 3 ) Prohibit the party failing to comply with such order from introducing evidence concerning, or otherwise relying upon testimony relating to the information sought;
( 4 ) Strike any part of the pleadings or other submissions of the party failing to comply with such request; or
( 5 ) Request that the Attorney General petition an appropriate district court for an order to enforce a subpoena.
( d ) If a party fails to prosecute or defend an action under this subpart commenced by service of a complaint, the ALJ may dismiss the action or enter an initial decision imposing penalties and assessments.
( e ) The ALJ may refuse to consider any motion or other action which is not filed in a timely fashion.
!?!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

!?

Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

!"a$

!"c$

!"c$

!"a$ White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

± Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

?¿

?Â

Aã

?3⁄4

Iz

I}

Iv

Iv

Iz

Map 2-20

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Area

Utility & Transportation

Corridors and

Communication Sites

Alternative B

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Corridors Allocations

Multi-use Corridor

Transportation Corridor

!? Communication Site
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) H-47: Mental Health Findings      

# Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) H-47: Mental Health Findings

This report, using data from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, provides national estimates of the prevalence of past year mental disorders and mental health service utilization among the United States population aged 12 years and older. 

http://store.samhsa.gov/product/SMA13-4805
#### 9904.420-20 Purpose.

The purpose of this Cost Accounting Standard is to provide criteria for the accumulation of independent research and development costs and bid and proposal costs and for the allocation of such costs to cost objectives based on the beneficial or causal relationship between such costs and cost objectives. Consistent application of these criteria will improve cost allocation.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Tips for Driving Safely During the Holiday Season      

# Resource: Tips for Driving Safely During the Holiday Season

This webpage shares tips for driver safety, teen driver safety, and child passenger safety during the holiday season.**Learn more.**
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 27, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 27, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0190. EXPRESS TOWING INC. v. ELIZABETH R. CLEMMONS et al. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: SUV2021000215
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Digest of Education Statistics, 2012      

# Digest of Education Statistics, 2012

The 48th in a series, the Digest provides statistical information related to the field of education. Covering prekindergarten through graduate school, this report provides information on a variety of topics including numbers of schools, teachers, and students, federal funds for education, and international comparisons. 

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2014015
#### 970.2672-3 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 970.5226-2, Workforce Restructuring Under Section 3161 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, in contracts for the management and operation of Department of Energy Defense Nuclear Facilities and, as appropriate, in other contracts that include site management responsibilities at a Department of Energy Defense Nuclear Facility.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 68221, Nov. 5, 2010]
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

38 39 40



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 05/26 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### MAR 24 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CLARENCE EDWARD CODY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-7092 (D.C. No. 96-CV-264) (E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before BRORBY, EBEL, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. **
Mr. Cody seeks a certificate of appealability from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. 28 U.S.C. § 2255; see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) & (2). Despite a similar claim rejected on direct appeal, See United States v. Cody , 7 F.3d 1523, 1527 (10th Cir. 1993), Mr. Cody again challenges the marijuana plant count (1,028 plants) that resulted in a 10-year mandatory minimum- 2 -

sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A)(vii) . The premise of his argument is that 37 drying plants are not properly counted as plants, an argument foreclosed by United States v. Silvers , 84 F.3d 1317, 1325 (10th Cir. 1996), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 742 (1997). That said, arguments about the applicability of Sentencing Guideline Amendment 516, U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c) (retroactivity) & App. C, amend. 516, are unavailing because the amendment cannot be applied to bring the sentence below the statutory mandatory minimum for 1,000 or more marijuana plants. Silvers , 84 F.3d at 1325. We thus conclude that Mr. Cody has not made “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Application for a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED.
Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3518

_____________________________
W ILLIE V. C RUZ , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County

. John F. Simon , Judge

. July 11, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , B.L. T HOMAS , and R OBERTS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Willie V. Cruz, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
925.7003 Requirements. ( a ) For the acquisition of nuclear hot cell services under the conditions in paragraph (b) of this section, the selection official in evaluating competitive offers for selection purposes only shall— ( 1 ) Consider neither costs related to the decommissioning of nuclear waste facilities nor costs related to the storage and disposal of nuclear waste; or
( 2 ) Add these costs to offers of foreign companies.
( b ) The requirements of this section apply under the following circumstances— ( 1 ) One or more of the offers is submitted by a United States company and includes costs related to the decommissioning of nuclear facilities and costs related to the storage and disposal of nuclear waste because it is subject to such costs; and
( 2 ) One or more of the offers is submitted by a foreign company and does not include these types of costs. (A foreign company might not be subject to such costs or might not have to include these types of costs in its offer if the firm is subsidized in decommissioning activity or storage and disposal of nuclear waste, or a foreign government is performing the activities below the actual cost of the activity.)
[58 FR 8910, Feb. 18, 1993, as amended at 74 FR 36366, July 22, 2009]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sidney Lipsitz, Appellant.

Motion granted and time for argument of appeal enlarged to include May 1962 Term. If, however, respondent is unable, with reasonable diligence, to file and serve a brief on or before April 26, 1962, such brief may be filed and served on or before June 15, 1962, in which latter event the case shall be argued at the September 1962 Term.
#### UHLHORN v. HOVEY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

February 27, 1906.)

Account Stated—Issues and Proof.

In an action on an account stated, defendant is not entitled to show under a general denial that plaintiff is indebted to him for matters altogether outside the items, embraced in the account.

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District.

Action by Gertrude C. V. Uhlhorn against Edwin J. Hovey. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before SCOTT, P. J., and GIEGERICH and GREEN-BAUM, JJ.

Davies, Stone & Auerbach (Julien T. Davies, Jr., and Ward W. Pickard, of counsel), for appellant.

Frederick Durgan, for respondent.

SCOTT, P. J.

The action was upon an account stated, the defense a general denial. The only issue presented was as to whether or not there had been an account stated. Unquestionably there had been as to á certain sum of money paid to defendant by plaintiff to be expended for certain purposes. There is no attempt to avoid the account, or to show that it was induced by fraud, or made by mistake. The defendant was, however, permitted, under his general denial, to introduce evidence which, as he claimed, showed that plaintiff was indebted to him for matters altogether outside the matter embraced in the account. This, of course, he should not have been permitted to dó. Such proof cannot bé received in support of a general denial in an action upon an account stated.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
970.3102-05-6 Compensation for personal services. ( a ) ( 6 ) In determining the reasonableness of compensation, the compensation of each individual contractor employee normally need not be subjected to review and approval. Generally, the compensation paid individual employees should be left to the judgment of contractors subject to the limitations of DOE-approved compensation policies, programs, classification systems, and schedules, and amounts of money authorized for wage and salary increases for groups of employees. However, the contracting officer shall designate a compensation threshold appropriate for the particular situation. The contract shall specifically provide that contracting officer approval is required for compensating an individual contractor employee above the threshold if a total of 50 percent or more of such compensation is reimbursed under DOE cost-type contracts. For purposes of designating the threshold, total compensation includes only the employee's salary and cash bonus or incentive compensation.
( 7 ) ( i ) Reimbursable costs for compensation for personal services are to be set forth in the contract. This compensation shall be set forth using the principles and policies of 48 CFR 31.205-6, Compensation, as supplemented by this section, 970.3102-05-6, and other pertinent parts of the DEAR. Costs that are unallowable under other contract terms shall not be allowable as compensation for personnel services.
( ii ) The contract sets forth, in detail, personnel costs and related expenses allowable under the contract and documents personnel policies, practices and plans which have been found acceptable by the contracting officer. The contractor will advise DOE of any proposed changes in any matters covered by these policies, practices, or plans which relate to personnel costs. Types of personnel costs and related expenses addressed in the contract are as follows: Salaries and wages; bonuses and incentive compensation; overtime, shift differential, holiday, and other premium pay for time worked; welfare benefits and retirement programs; paid time off, and salaries and wages to employees in their capacity as union stewards and committeemen for time spent in handling grievances, or serving on labor management (contractor) committees provided, however, that the contracting officer's approval is required in each instance of total compensation to an individual employee above an annual rate as specified in the contract.
( p ) ( 1 ) Notwithstanding the costs cited in this subsection, incurred for compensation of a senior executive in excess of the benchmark compensation amount determined applicable for the contractor fiscal year by the Administrator, Office of Federal Procurement Policy, are unallowable. Allowable costs of executive compensation shall be determined pursuant to 48 CFR 31.205-6(p).
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 68219, Nov. 5, 2010]
#### BROWN et al., Respondents, v. RETSOF MINING CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by Edward W. Brown and James W. Shaw against the Retsof Mining Company.

No opinion. Motion denied,