alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 41.401 Monthly and annual review.

Agencies shall review utility service invoices on a monthly basis and all utility accounts, with annual values exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, on an annual basis. Annual reviews of accounts with annual values at or below the simplified acquisition threshold shall be conducted when deemed advantageous to the Government. The purpose of the monthly review is to ensure the accuracy of utility service invoices. The purpose of the annual review is to ensure that the utility supplier is furnishing the services to each facility under the utility's most economical, applicable rate and to examine competitive markets for more advantageous service offerings. The annual review shall be based upon the facility's usage, conditions and characteristics of service at each individual delivery point for the most recent 12 months. If a more advantageous rate is appropriate, the Federal agency shall request the supplier to make such rate change immediately.

[59 FR 67018, Dec. 28, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 34759, July 3, 1995]
EXHIBIT 12

                      THE CIT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (Dollar Amounts In Millions)

                                                             Six Months Ended
                                                                 June 30,
                                                            -------------------
                                                              1999        1998
                                                            -------     -------
 Net income                                                 $ 188.2     $ 165.4

 Provision for income taxes                                   100.5        91.7
                                                            -------     -------
 Earnings before provision for income taxes                   288.7       257.1
                                                            -------     -------
 Fixed Charges:
 Interest and debt expense on indebtedness                    554.1       502.4
 Minority interest in subsidiary trust holding solely
   debentures of the company                                    9.6         9.6
 Interest factor - one third of rentals on
   real and personal properties                                 4.9         4.9
                                                            -------     -------
 Total fixed charges                                          568.6       516.9
                                                            -------     -------
 Total earnings before provision for income
   taxes and fixed charges                                  $ 857.3     $ 774.0
                                                            =======     =======

 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           1.51x       1.50x
                                                            =======     =======
##### 



Page 23 of 23 Exhibit 99(h)
 KeyBank National Association, formerly
    
    Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americasknown as Key Bank USA, National Association
    
    formerly known as Bankers Trust Company800 Superior Avenue, 4th Floor
    
    as Indenture TrusteeCleveland, OH 44114
    
    60 Wall Street, 26th Floor  MS NYC60-2606New York, NY 10007JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., formally
    
    MBIA Insurance Corporationknown as Bank One, National Association
    
    as Securities Insureras Eligible Lender Trustee
    
    113 King Street4 New York Plaza, 6th Floor
    
    Armonk, NY 10504New York, NY 10004
 Independent Accountants Report
For KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-B We have examined managements assertion, included in its representation letter dated March 9, 2005
that KeyBank, National Association (KBNA), formerly known as Key Bank USA, National Association, a
wholly owned subsidiary of KeyCorp, complies with sections 4.04, 4.08(a), 4.08(b), 4.08(c), 5.05,
5.06, 5.07 and 5.08 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-B Sale and Servicing Agreement and
sections 1.(a)(xx), 1.(b)(iii), 2 and 3 of the KeyCorp Student Loan Trust 2000-B Administration
Agreement (collectively, the Agreements) as of December 31, 2004 and for the year then ended.
Management is responsible for KBNAs compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on managements assertion about KBNAs compliance based on our
examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test
basis, evidence about KBNAs compliance with those requirements and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances, except that in accordance with Section
5.05 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement, our examination assumed the accuracy of reports prepared
by KBNAs student loan processor. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on KBNAs compliance with the
specified requirements. In our opinion, assuming the accuracy of reports prepared by KBNAs student loan processor,
managements assertion that KBNA complied with the aforementioned requirements as of December 31,
2004 and for the year then ended is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Cleveland, Ohio
March 9, 2005
Long Bay Aviation LLC

Page 1 of 1 | 6/6/2011 June 06, 2011

Docket Management Facility US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140 Washington DC 20590

Long Bay Aviation LLC is requesting an exempt ion from maintaining separate drug and alcohol testing programs to cover its safety-sensitive employees.

Long Bay Aviation LLC holds a 'single pilot', 's ingle aircraft', 'part 135', Air Carrier Certificate (3LGA615M). Long Bay Aviation LLC also holds a Le tter of Authorization for Scenic Tours with the Greensboro NC FSDO, and is requesting a Lette r of Authorization for Scenic Tours with the

Columbia SC FSDO.

Long Bay Aviation currently utilizes one pilot for both the Part 135 and Part 91 operations, and one additional pilot to augment the Part 91 operations.

Maintaining separate programs to cover the same individuals would more than double the cost of maintaining one drug and alcohol program. Long Bay Aviation is a small operation and the costs of maintaining multiple drug and alcohol prog rams would amount to a financial hardship.

I personally have direct oversight of the Drug and Alcohol Prevention Program and can more than adequately manage all personnel under one progra m. I believe this will still meet the intended goals of the governments drug and alcohol testin g requirement for safety-sensitive personnel.

We are therefore requesting an exemption be given, allowing all company personnel to be covered under one drug and alcohol program.

Best Regards,

William Leppert
Chief Pilot | DER
Long Bay Aviation LLC

538 Wild Horse Ct Myrtle Beach SC 29579
(843) 437-7731 treppel@comcast.net
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Recording Available: Addressing the Behavioral Health Needs of Adopted Children and Youth      

# Recording Available: Addressing the Behavioral Health Needs of Adopted Children and Youth

This webisode explores strategies for supporting the unique behavioral health needs of adopted children and their families. It was originally aired to coincide with the release of the new report, “Domestic and International Adoption: Strategies To Improve Behavioral Health Outcomes for Youth and Their Families.”

http://fda.yorkcast.com/webcast/Play/9c0886ae81054e25bee50db63adbc2ed1d?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Performance Measures Resources      

# Performance Measures Resources

This is a one-stop resource for applicants and grantees which offers the ability to review the significance of performance measures in light of relevant federal legislation; assist applicants in developing a logic model that sets goals and objectives for their program; helps applicants select appropriate performance measures and identify pertinent data sources for performance reporting; and enables grantees to report their performance measures online.

http://www.ojjdp.gov/grantees/pm/
#### § 1.181 Purpose of these rules.

The Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. 504 (called “EAJA” in this subpart), provides for the award of attorney fees and other expenses to eligible individuals and entities who are parties to certain administrative proceedings (called “adversary adjudications”) before the Department. An eligible party may receive an award when it prevails over the Department unless the position of the Department was substantially justified or special circumstances make an award unjust. Alternatively, an eligible party may receive an award in connection with an adversary adjudication arising from an agency action to enforce the party's compliance with a statutory or regulatory requirement where the demand by the agency is substantially in excess of the decision of the adjudicative officer and is unreasonable when compared with such decision under the facts and circumstances of the case. The rules in this subpart describe the parties eligible for awards and the proceedings that are covered. They also explain how to apply for awards, and the procedures and standards that the Department will use to make awards.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rosheen Gill, Also Known as Sean Jones, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 848]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward Davidowitz, J., at suppression hearing; Joseph Fisch, J., at plea and sentence), rendered December 12, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his suppression claim *(People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 9-10 [1989]; *People v Graham,*220 AD2d 215 [1995], *lv denied*87 NY2d 1019 [1996]). In any event, were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver, we would reject his suppression arguments.

Since we are affirming defendant’s New York County conviction, his argument that, in the event of a reversal of that conviction, the instant conviction should likewise be reversed has been rendered academic. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Lerner, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Richard W. Mott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Kyphon Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Kyphon Inc.



|     |  |                |  |                                                 |  |                    
|---- |  | -------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|Date |  | March 10, 2004 |  | By:                                             |  | /s/ Richard W. Mott
|     |  |                |  | Richard W. Mott                                
|     |  |                |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|     |  |                |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                  



I, Jeffrey L. Kaiser, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Kyphon Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Kyphon Inc.



|     |  |                |  |                                               |  |                      
|---- |  | -------------- |  | --------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Date |  | March 10, 2004 |  | By:                                           |  | /s/ Jeffrey L. Kaiser
|     |  |                |  | Jeffrey L. Kaiser                            
|     |  |                |  | Vice President of Finance and Administration,
|     |  |                |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer        
|     |  |                |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Mineral resources of the BigHorn Mountains Wilderness Study Area, Maricopa County, Arizona**
 
Report | Plate 01
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:1701-A
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000966078
 
November 27, 2018
#### § 1051.52 Adjusted Class I differentials.

See § 1000.52.
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0663

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

SKYLER L. GRIEBEL,

Defendant and Appellee.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellant is granted an extension of time to 

and including May 31, 2024, within which to prepare, serve, and file its opening

brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 24 2024

04/24/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0663
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  report  of Marmion Industries Corp. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ellen  Raidl,  Treasurer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     3.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     4.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                        /s/ Ellen Raidl
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Ellen Raidl, Treasurer
                                        Date:   May 18, 2005


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THTE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of AmBase Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Ferrara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  May 9, 2011


/s/ John P. Ferrara


John P. Ferrara Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


AmBase Corporation
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary Overman, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 886]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), dated May 1, 2002, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s *597determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, based on the facts contained in the presentence investigation report, and the case summary and risk assessment instrument of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders *(see*Correction Law § 168-n; *People v Angelo,*3 AD3d 482 [2004]; *People v Oquendo,*1 AD3d 421 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 599 [2004]; *People v Baker,*303 AD2d 570 [2003]). Altman, J.P., H. Miller, Krausman and Cozier, JJ., concur.
#### 970.4402 Contractor purchasing system.
#### In the Matter of Michael Rosato, Appellant, v New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.

[777 NYS2d 186]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Appeals Board, dated June 25, 2003, which affirmed a decision of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, denying the petitioner’s application for the reissuance of his driver’s license, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dillon, J.), entered *719September 24, 2003, which denied the petition, and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant’s contention that the respondent New York State Department of Motor Vehicles (hereinafter the DMV) should have used the definition of “serious physical injury” under Penal Law § 10.00 (10), instead of the lesser standard of “physical injury” contained in Penal Law § 10.00 (9), in deciding whether to reissue his driver’s license after a prior revocation is without merit. Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193 (2) (c) (3) requires the DMV to use the definition of “physical injury” contained in Penal Law § 10.00. When a statute contains a clear mandate, its plain language must be followed *(see People v Robinson,*95 NY2d 179, 183 [2000]). Furthermore, the injury at issue in each of the two subject accidents, a concussion, was sufficient to meet the statutory standard for physical injury *(see People v Mack,*301 AD2d 863 [2003]; *People v Mill,*300 AD2d 323 [2002]).

As the petitioner admitted to “having been twice convicted of a violation” set forth in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3), and the DMV records established that a “physical injury,” as defined in Penal Law § 10.00, resulted from each such offense, the DMV had no discretion to reissue the petitioner’s driver’s license. Thus, its determination was not arbitrary or capricious or an abuse of discretion.

In light of our determination, we need not address the DMV’s remaining contention. Altman, J.P., Smith, S. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
#### § 1007.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing factors.

See § 1000.50.
915.603 General. ( f ) Unsolicited proposals for the performance of support services are, except as discussed in this paragraph, unacceptable as the performance of such services is unlikely to necessitate innovative and unique concepts. There may be rare instances in which an unsolicited proposal offers an innovative and unique approach to the accomplishment of a support service. If such a proposal offers a previously unknown or an alternative approach to generally recognized techniques for the accomplishment of a specific service(s) and such approach will provide significantly greater economy or enhanced quality, it may be considered for acceptance. Such acceptance shall, however, require approval of the acquisition of support services in accordance with applicable DOE Directives and be processed as a deviation to the prohibition in this paragraph.
[63 FR 56851, Oct. 23, 1998, as amended at 74 FR 36364, July 22, 2009]