STATE OF ARIZONA

STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) REVISION

APPENDIX 4

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLISTS FOR ARTICLES 6,7, AND 8

JULY 15, 1998
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rules: R18-2-601 thru 610. Emissions From Existing and Nonpoint Sources

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rules (Applicable SIP): R9-3-401 thru

410

3. Pollutants Regulatedby Rule:

PM: X , SOx:

, VOC: , NOx:

, CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Area sources.

Location (city, county or statewide)

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Renumbered entire Article. No

change in rule text.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Not quantifiable except on a

source by source basis. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: Each

rule requires use of work practices or equipment to minimize emissions of smoke and fugitive dust.
compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See compliance operating plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations from EPA policies (as appropriate): None.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-701. Definitions. (Article 5. Existing Stationary Source Performance Standards)

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): Most of these definitions were part of R9-3--lOl. Some are new.

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule: N/A

PM:

, SOx:

, VOC:

, NOx:

, CC:

, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Definitions applicable to all sources subject to Arizona existing stationary source performance standards. These include sources inside and outside nonattainment areas.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Definitions moved from general definitions for all air pollution rules to the applicable

made

article to improve ease of use. Minor clarifications were in some definitions.

. Rule’s effect on emissions: N/A. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

materials,

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: N/A

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or recordkeeping/reporting requirements: N/A

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine compliance (includi

f
regulatory restrictions. As such, Questions 3,4,6,7,8,9,10, and 11 are N/A. Applicable questions will be answered for each definition using a checklist modified for definitions. This checklist consists of Questions 1,2,5, and 12 from the full completeness checklist.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MODIFIED SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS

DEFINITIONS: R18-2-701.1 - R18-2-701.36

1. Rule: R18-2-701.1. “Acid mist”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-101.1

5.

placed

Summary

with

of Rule/Rule changes: Renumbered definition and appropriate article. Definition now references 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, as well as the Arizona Testing Manual.

12. Other comments: None.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.2. “Architectural coating”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.11

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Renumbered definition and placed with appropriate Article. Clarified text.

12. Other comments: None.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.3. “Asphalt concrete plant”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-101.14 and R9-3-508.A.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Expanded to include a complete description of term by integrating part of R9-3-508 into the definition

i

t

d 

f 
1. Rule: R18-2-701.4. “Black liquor”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP) : R9-3--lOl.22

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Text unchanged.

12. Other comments: Placed definition in appropriate Article and renumbered.
1. Rule: R18-2-701.5. “Calcine”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.25

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Clarified: changed definition from the solids produced by a “ roaster 11 to the solids produced by a “lime plant.”

12. Other comments: Placed definition in appropriate Article and

renumbered.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.6 “Concentrate”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.40

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: “Copper” removed as modifier in

title because term is only applicable to primary copper smelters.

2. Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed in the

appropriate Article.

1. Rule: Rl8-2-701.7 “Concentrate dryer”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.41

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: “Copper” removed as modifier in

title because term is only applicable to primary copper smelters.

12. Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed in 

i
2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.42

5.

title

Summary

because

of Rule/Rule changes: “Copper modifier removed from term is only applicable to primary copper smelters.

12.

appropriate

Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed with Article.
1. Rule: Rl8-2-701.9 “Condensate stripper system”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lOl.36

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12.

Article.

Other comments: Renumbered. Definition placed in appropriate

1. Rule: R18-2-701.lO “Control device”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lO1.39

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered. Definition placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.11 “Converter”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.43

5.

title

Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Modifier “copper” removed from because term is only applicable to primary copper smelters.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and moved to appropriate Article.

1

Rule: R18

2

701

12 “F

i
9IDT1JV •

H
1. Rule: R18-2-701.13 “Fugitive dust”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1Ol.70

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered. Definition placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.14 “High sulfur oil”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): None, new definition.

V

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: These characteristics for fuel oil were referenced in several rules, prompting development of this definition, by implication. Specifications identical to Applicable SIP.

12. Other comments: Added as needed clarification of rules.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.15 “Lime kiln”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.8

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered. Definition placed in appropriate Article.
than 0.90 percent by weight of sulfur.

12. Other comments: Placed in appropriate Article.
1. Rule: R18-2-701.17 “Matte 1’

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3--lO1.44

5.

title

Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Modifier “copper” removed from because term is only applicable to primary copper smelters.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.18 “Miscellaneous metal parts and products”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lOl.98

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Improved wording; no change in content.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: Rl8-2-701.19 “Multiple-effect evaporator system”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lOl.97

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: The parenthetical “(black

definition.

liquor)” was considered unnecessary and was removed from Other minor changes to comform with Attorney General standards for rules.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.
improve clarity.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.
1. Rule: R18—2-701.21 “Petroleum liquids”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1Ol.116

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: ASTM references updated.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.22 “Process source”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.125

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor rewording to improve clarity.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18—2-701.23 “Process weight”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.126

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.24 “Process weight rate”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.127
12.. Other comments: Remaining definition renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.
1. Rule: R18-2-701.25 Recovery furnace”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lO1.131

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Simplified by deleting definitions of several subtypes of recovery furnaces. The examples provided in the Applicable SIP rule were considered unecessary because standards applicable to recovery furnaces are the same regardless of age or construction.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.26 “Reid vapor pressure”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9—3--1O1.134

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Only change: updated ASTM reference.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-70l.27 “Reverberatory smelting furnace”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1Ol.45

5. Summary of RulejRule changes: Modifier “copper” removed from title because term is only applicable to primary copper smelters.

12. Other comments: Rule renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.
5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Definition renumbered without change, and moved to appropriate article.

12. other comments: None.
1. Rule: R18-2-701.29 “Slag”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lO1.143

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to improve clarity.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.30 “Smelt dissolving tank”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.144

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and moved to appropriate article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.31 “Smelter feed”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.145

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Definition renumbered and placed in appropriate article; minor wording changes to improve clarity.

12. Other comments: None.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.32 “Smelting”
12. Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed in

appropriate article.
1. Rule: R18—2-701.33 “Smelting furnace”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1Ol.47

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Word “copper” removed from

title because term is only applicable to primary copper smelters.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.34 “Standard conditions”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3--lOl.154

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed with appropriate rules.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.35 “Supplementary control system”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP) : R9-3-1O1.152

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed with appropriate rules.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.36 “Vapor pressure”

2

EPA Analogous Approved R

l

(A

li

bl

SI

P
r

iI

E

ED
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-702. General provisions

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-501

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X

, SOx: , VOC: , NOx:

, CC: , Pb:____

Paragraph E., which describes how process weight rate is to be

used in compliance determinations, may apply to other pollutants.

4. Identification of Sources: Existing sources.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Renumbered, and revised as

follows: Paragraph A. added to limit applicability to existing sources. Paragraphs B. and C. (former A. and B.) revised for clarity and proper referencing of test methods.

Former paragraph C., which provided for alternative opacity standards, deleted and replaced with new paragraph D. New paragraph D. provides for more explicit procedures for the development and approval of alternative opacity limits; including public notice and comment. Former paragraph D. deleted as obsolete. Finally, new paragraph E. includes

portions of the Applicable SIP definition “process weight rate” (R9-3-lO1.131)
7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: See number 6, above.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: N/A

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or recordkeeping/reporting requirements: N/A

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See compliance operating plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known. Alternative opacity limits are only permitted for non-NSPS sources.

12. Other comments: Alternative opacity limits provision is approved and in Applicable SIP.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2--702. General provisions

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx:

, CC:

, Pb:____

Paragraph E., which describes how process weight rate is to be

used in compliance determinations, may apply to other pollutants.

3. Identification of Sources: Existing sources.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. See completeness checklist.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes, (a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM; Lbs/hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? N/A.
11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? See Method 9.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See paragraph ID.

13. Are records required to be kept? N/A

14. What records are required determine compliance? N/A

is. In what form or unite must the records be kept? On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? N/A.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how applied, who makes determination): N/A.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-703. Standards of performance for fossil-fuel

fired steam generators and general fuel burning equipment

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-503

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X

, 50x: X , VOC: , NOx: X , CO: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS sources.

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, for coal

fired plants only.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Renumbered. Provision allowing averaging of total heat input of all units for determining the allowable emissions of a plant (former paragraph C.) eliminated as obsolete. Applicability provision from deleted

paragraph included in subparagraph A.2.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Emission limitations included in

paragraph C. through I.. No SIP credits claimed for rule.

7. NA1QS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: Emission limitations set independent of ambient

concentrations. However, operations that cause violations of

NAAQS prohibited (e.g. see paragraph H.)
9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See paragraphs C. through I.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See compliance operating plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-703. Standards of performance for existing fossil-fuel fired steam generators and general fuel burning equipment

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: , NOX: X

, CC:

, Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS sources.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used? Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes, (a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Opacity and Lbs/hr for PM; Lbs/million Btu for SOx; Lbs/3Hrs for NOx.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
paragraphs C. through I., and number 6, above.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See paragraph C. through I.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required to determine compliance? See Arizona Testing Manual, Section 1. Also, see R18-2-313.C.1.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept? On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept?

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-704. Standards of performance for incinerators

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-504.

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx:

, CC:

, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non—NSPS incinerators.

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, except areas under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Numerous wording changes to improve clarity. Emissions standard for air curtain destructors deleted because methods are not available to monitor mass emissions from this type of source. Provision for variances for compliance test methods deleted.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Emission limitations provided for in paragraph B. No SIP credits claimed for this rule.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No specific requirements other than emission limit

ti

d 
paragraph B.; test methods - paragraph F.; work practice standards - paragraph C.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

compliance operating plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-704. Standards of performance for incinerators

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx:

, CC:

, Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS incinerators.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. Yes, see paragraph D.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes, (a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity; Lbs/hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A

10. What test method is required? Method 9; see paragraph F
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See 11, above.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? Daily charging rates and hours of operation (see paragraph E.).

15. In what form or units must the records be kept? On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be kept? Written daily records, as required in permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how applied, who makes determination): See R8-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-705. Standards of performance for existing portland cement plants

2. EPA Analogous Apprpved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-505

3. Pollutants Regulated by.Rule:

PM: X

, SOx: X , VOC: , NOx:

, CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Cement Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to improve clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule s effect on emissions: Sets PM and SOx limits, as a function of feed rate. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.:

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice standards, averaging times

test proced

d/
11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate) : None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rl8-2-705. Standards of performance for existing portland cement plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X

, SOx: X , VOC: , NOx:

, CC:

, Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Cement Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used? Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes, (a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? For PM, percent opacity and Lbs PM/ton process weight. For SOx, Lbs/ton of feed.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A
Hourly.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? In

accordance with EPA reference methods.

13., Are records required to be kept? Yes.
14. What records are required determine compliance? Daily charging rates and hours of operation.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? Daily, written, format identified in permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination) : See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT O ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-706. Standards of performance for existing nitric acid plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-506

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , SOx:

, VOC: , NOx: X

, CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Nitric acid plants. Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to improve clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Sets NOx rate as a function of

production rate. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc. : No specifc controls required by rule.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

• Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate) : None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-706. Standards of performance for existing nitric acid

plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM:

, SOx: , VOC: , NOx: X , CC:

, Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Nitric Acid Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity Kg NOx/metric ton production rate.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See

paragraph 0.3.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.
14. What records are required determine compliance? CEM records

per R18-2-313

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? See R18-2-313.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-707. Standards of performance for existing

sulfuric acid plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-507

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM:

, SOx: X , VOC: , NOx:

_____,

CC:

, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Sulfuric Acid Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits SOx and acid mist

emissions. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific control requirement in rule.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-707. Standards of performance for existing sulfuric acid

plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , SOx: X , VOC: , NOx:

, CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Sulfuric Acid Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Kg SOx/Metric ton acid

produced; Kg acid mist/Metric ton acid produced.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

:‘
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See

paragraph D.3. and 13.4.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? In accordance

with R18-2-313.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? See R18-2-313.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination) See R18-2-314. 
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONNENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

l. Rule: R18-2-708. Standards of performance for existing

asphalt concrete plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-508

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CO: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Asphalt Concrete Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution controlprograms.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions as a function

of process weight rate. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule except for

prohibition on use of high sulfur fuel
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection): SeeCompliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-708. Standards of performance for existing asphalt

concrete plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Asphalt Concrete Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM;

Lbs/Hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See

paragraph G.2.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-709. Standards of performance for existing

petroleum refineries

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-5093. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: X , NOx: , CC: X , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Petroleum Refineries.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits VOC and SOx emissions in

accordance with design and work practice standards and to meetPSD requirements. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: See

paragraph G.2.and G.3.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See

paragraphs C. through G.

9

Rule section containing emission limitations

work practice
compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: Subjects all refineries to NSPS (Subpart J)

with the exception of CEM requirements for refineries of 7,000barrels per day or less.

Y
11. What is the averaging time in the complianc.e test method? In

accordance with applicable EPA Reference Methods.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See

NSPS.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.14. What recàrds are required determine compliance? As required

by NSPS.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? As required by NSPS.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-710. Standards of performance for existing

storage vessels for petroleum liquids

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-510

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , SOx: , VOC: X , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Storage Vessels for

Petroleum Liquids.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve clarity and remove redundancies. Gasoline volitility

testing and control repealed because of comprehensive fuels

regulation program under the auspices of the Arizona

Department of Weights and Measures adopted 1979.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits VOC emissions in

accordance with design and work practice standards. No SIPcredits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See

h

A

h

h D
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: Liquid fuel rules will be handled in a

separate submittal.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-710. Standards of performance for existing storage

vessels for petroleum liquids

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , SOx: , VOC: X , NOx: , CO: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Storage Vessels for

Petroleum Liquids.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? No emission limits, all

standards are design and work practice based.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9

What is the attainment date? N/A
11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method?

N/A.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? No.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? See

paragraph E.2.

is. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? See paragraph E.2.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination) : None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-711. Standards of performance for existing

secondary lead smelters

2. EPA nalogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-511

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb: X

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Secondary Lead Smelters.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Sets limits on particulate

emissions of lead. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : No such

facilities in Arizona at this time.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-711. Standards of performance for existing secondary

lead smelters

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb: X

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Secondary Lead Smelters.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM;

Lbs/Hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required comp1ince calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? In

accordance with Method 5.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.14. What records are required determine compliance? In accordance

with permit requirements.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? In accordance with permit requirements.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination) See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIROIMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-712. Standards of performance for existing

secondary brass and bronze ingot production plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-5123. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , 50x: , VOC: , NOx: , CD: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Secondary Brass and

Bronze Ingot Production Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Sets limits on particulate

emissions. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments andRFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

ifi

t

h

l

i

t

contained in rule
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : SeeCompliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None.

.12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-712. Standards of performance for existing secondary

brass and bronze ingot production plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Brass and Bronze Ingot

Production Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient •standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM;

Lbs/Hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9

What i

th

tt

i

t d

t

? N/A
required in applicable EPA Reference Method.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required in applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? In accordance

with permit requirements.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? In accordance with permit requirements.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See Rl8-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-713. Standards of performance for existing iron

and steel plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-513

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CD: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Iron and Steel Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Sets limits on particulate

emissions. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements contained in rule.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-713. Standards of performance for existing iron and

steel plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CD: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Iron and Steel Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No..

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

E. What are the units of compliance? For PM, Opacity; see

paragraph A.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required in applicable EPA reference method.

13. Are records required to be kept? As required in permit.

14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

in permit.

15.. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? As required in permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-714. Standards of performance for existing sewage

treatment plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-514

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Sewage Treatment Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits particulate emissions. No

SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See

paragraph B. No other specific technnology requirements in

rule.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : SeeCompliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rl8-2-714. Standards of performance for existing sewage

treatment plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Sewage Treatment Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM;

Lbs/Hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
with applicable EPA Reference Method.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? In

accordance with applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.
14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

in permit

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? As required in permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-715.XX Standards of performance for existing

primary copper smelters (includes three rules)

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-515

3.’ Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: All Primary Copper Smelters.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Rule reformatted and revised to

improve clarity. Obsolete provisions repealed.

G. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits particulate emissions

based on process weight rate. Limits on SOx emissions set to

provide for attainment of SO2 NAAQS.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: See

R18-2-715.F. and R18-2-715.02.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials,, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: Rule

contains performance standards. No technology based

requirements in rule
SO2;test procedures - see Rl8-2-715.E, R18-2-715.01.K.; for

recordkeeping - see R18-2-715.01.P.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: Copper smelter rule was broken down into

three major sections: R18-2-715 contains emission limitations

and required test procedures; R18-2-715.01 contains compliance

determination calculations and methods, monitoring andrecordkeeping requirements; and R18-2-715.02 containsrequirements for determining ambient air quality impacts of

fugitive SO2 emissions and procedures for developing fugitive

emission limits if necessary.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-715.XX. Standards of performance for existing primary

copper smelters (includes three rules)

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: All Primary Copper Smelters; some

specific requirements set on source-by-source basis.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? For PM Lbs/Ton of process

weight; for SO2 Lbs/Hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? January 14, 1986 unless

otherwise specified in a delayed compliance order or consent

decree.
11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? For

PM as required in applicable EPA Reference Methods; for SO2hourly and annual.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See

R18-2-715.F (for SO2), for PM in accordance with applicable

EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? See

R18-2-515 .P.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? See Rl8-2-715.P.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination) : See R18-2-314;

R18-2-515.Ol.N., R18-2-7l5.O1.T
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-716. Standards of performance for existing coal

preparation plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-516

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Coal Preparation Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits particulate emissions. No

SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc..: No

technology requirements contained in rule.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency oe inspection) : SeeCompliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-716. Standards of performance for existing coal

preparation plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Coal Preparation Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM;

Lbs/Hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations?. If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA reference methods.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R1S-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-717. Standards of performance for steel plants:

existing electric arc furnaces (EAF)

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-517

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Steel Plants with

Electric Arc Furnaces.Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits particulate emissions, no

SIP credits claimed.

7. NIAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

technology requirements contained in rule
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-717. Standards of performance for steel plants:

existing electric arc furnaces (EAF)

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Steel Plants with

Electric Arc Furnaces.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? Yes, see R18-2-717.C.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity, Lbs/Hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No..

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
paragraph D for opacity; otherwise as required by applicable

EPA Reference Method.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) •must the records be

kept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-718. Standards of performance for existing kraft

pulp mills

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-518

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CO: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Kraft Pulp Mills.

Location (ci.ty, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM and H2S emissions, no

SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

technology requirements contained in rule.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate) : None Known.

12. Other comments: None.

:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-718. Standards of performance for existing kraft pulp

mills

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Kraft Pulp Mills.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? For PM; opacity and Lbs/Hr.

For H2S; ppm.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
continous.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required in applicable EPA Reference Methods.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.
14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

in permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? As required in permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination) See Rl8-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: Rl8-2-719. Standards of performance for existing

stationary rotating machinery

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-5l9

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: , NOx: , CO: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Stationary turbines,

internal combustion and compression fired engines.

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM and SO2 emissions, no

SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements for PM; low sulfur oil
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

complianoe (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): No known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-719. Standards of performance for existing stationary

rotating machinery

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Stationary turbines,

internal combustion and compression fired engines.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. Conditional allowance for use

of high sulfur oil, see paragraphs G. and H.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Opacity for PM; Lbs/hr; for

SO2 Lbs/million BTU.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979:
11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? As

required by applicable EPA reference method.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA reference method.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? See

paragraphs I. and J.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? See apragraphs I. and J.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-720. Standards of performance for existing lime

manufacturing plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-520

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS lime manufacturing

plants.

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM, no SIP credits

claimed.

7. NAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : SeeCompliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-720. Standards of performance for existing lime

manufacturing plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS lime manufacturing

plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure.. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Opacity for PM; Lbs/hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-721. Standards of performance for existing

nonferrous metals industry sources

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-521

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS nonferrous metals mines,

mills, concentrators, crushers, screens, materials handling

facilities, fine ore storeage, dryers, roasters, and loaders.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

S. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM; reduced sulfur and

sulfur oxide emissions, no SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs

etc

: No
10, Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONNENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-721. Standards of performance for existing nonferrous

metals industry sources

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS nonferrous metals mines,

mills, concentrators, crushers, screens, materials handling

facilities, fine ore storeage, dryers, roasters, and loaders.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed?. If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Opacity for PM; Lbs/hr.

Sulfur compounds 10 percent of Sulfur entering process as

feed.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.
11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? See paragraph

F. and as required by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-722. Standards of performance for existing gravel

or crushed stone processing plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3--522

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Rock Products Processing

Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Emissions limitations for PM, no

SIP crdits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: Spray

bars, nozzles, or similar wet suppression systems required
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-722. Standards of performance for existing gravel or

crushed stone processing plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CO: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Rock Products Processing

Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Opacity for PM; Lbs/hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? See

paragraphs F. and G.

15. in what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination) : See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-723. Standards of performance for existing

concrete batch plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-523

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Concrete Batch Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits opacity of the emissions

(PM), no SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See

R18-2-404 through R18-2-407.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : SeeCompliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-723. Standards of performance for existing concrete

batch plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Concrete Batch Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM;

Lbs/hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records bekept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): N/A.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: Rl8-2-724. Standards of performance for fossil-fuel

fired industrial and commercial equipment

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-524

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Fossil-Fuel Fired

Industrial and Commercial Equipment

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM and SO2 emissions, no

SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PS]J increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection): See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other commonts: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-724. Standards of performance for fossil-fuel fired

industrial and commercial equipment

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: , NOx: , CO: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Fossil-Fuel Fired

Industrial and Commercial Equipment.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Opacity for PM; Lbs/hr.

For SO2 Lbs/million BTU.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A
required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes; see paragraph G.2. and

as required by permit.

14. What records are required determine compliance? See paragraph G.2. and as required by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-725. Standards of performance for existing dry cleaning plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-525

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM:

, SOx: , VOC: X , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non—NSPS Dry Cleaning Plants

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits VOC emissions, no SIP

credits claimed. V

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See

paragraph C.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-725. Standards of performance for existing dry cleaning plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM:

, SOx: , VOC: X , NOx: , CC: , Pb:

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Dry Cleaning Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure.No.

S. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent total hydrocarbon

emissions.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? No.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? In accordance

with permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? In accordance with permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination) : See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-726. Standards of performance for sandblasting

operations

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-526

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule: None.

PM: X , SOx: , ‘ICC; , NOx: , CO: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Sandblasting Operations.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Controls dust, no SIP credits

claimed.

7. NAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection): See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-726. Standards of performance for sandblasting

operations

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule: None.

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Sandblasting Operations.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? N/A.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? N/A.

13. Are records required to be kept? N/A.

14. What records are required determine compliance?N/A.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? N/A.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): N/A.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-727. Standards of performance for spray painting operations

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-527 and

R19-3-1Ol .122

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , SOx: , VOC: X , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Spray Painting Operations

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits VOC emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule

Sets perfor
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: Rl8-2-727. Standards of performance for spray painting

operations

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , SOx: , VOC: X , NOx:

, CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Spray Painting Operations.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

S. What are the units of compliance? Percent VOC/Volume, percent

overspray capture, no SIP credits claimed

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? N/A.

13. Are records required to be kept? N/A.

14. What records are required to determine compliance? N/A.

1. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? N/A.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): N/A.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-728. Standards of performance for existing

ammonium sulfide manufacturing plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-528

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Ammonium Sulfide

Manufacturing Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM and H2S emissions, no

SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See :?

paragraph E
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None, Known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-728. Standards of performance for existing

ammonium sulfide manufacturing plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CO: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Ammonium Sulfide

Manufacturing Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No. V

S. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM;

Lbs/hr. Ppm for H2S. V

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No. V

8. What is the compliance date? May 14,1979.

4:, 9. What is the attainment date? N/A
required by applicable EPA Reference Method. Also, see

paragraph D. for H2S.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? As required by permit.

14. What records are required determine compliance? As required by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-729. Standards of performance for cotton gins

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-529

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CO: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources; Non-NSPS Cotton Gins.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See

R18-2-404 through R18-2-407.
compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: Rl8-2-729. Standards of performance for cotton gins

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC:

, NOx:

, CC:

, Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Cotton Gins.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used? Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes, (a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM, no SIP credits claimed.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? September 22, 1983.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? As required by permit.

14. What records are required determine compliance? As required by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept? On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be kept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how applied, who makes determination): N/A.

:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-730. Standards of performance for unclassified

sources

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-502

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: X , NOx: X

, CC:

, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: All Unclassified non-NSPS Sources. Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, except areas under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No substantive changes; moved to end of article for clarity and ease of use.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM, SO2, VOC, and NO2 emissions, no SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See paragraph G.
10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection): See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

• from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABflITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-730. Standards of performance for unclassified

sources

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: X , VOC: X , NOx: X

, CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: All Unclassified Sources.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes, (a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? See paragraph A.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.
12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See

paragraph A.

13. Are records required to be kept? As required by permit.

14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): N/A.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-80l. Classification of mobile sources

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-601

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CO: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Mobile Sources.

Location (city, county or statewide):

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times

test procedures and/or
11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMEI’rAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-802. Off-road machinery

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-602

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Off-road Machinery.

Location (city, county or statewide):

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

S. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice :

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or
11. Special economic/technological justificatjo for deviations from EPA policies (as appropriate) : None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: Rl8-2-803. Heater-planer units

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-603

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X

, SOx:

,VOC:

, NOx:

, CC:

_____,

Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Heater-planer Units. Location (city, county or statewide):

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions, no SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No specific technology requirements in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice standards

averaging times

t

t 

d

d/
11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: Rl8-2--804. Roadway and site cleaning machinery

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-604

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx: , CC: , Pb,:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Roadway and Site Cleaning Machinery.

Location (city, county or statewide)

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction’ Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations

work practice
Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-805. Asphalt or tar kettles

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-605

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx: , VOC: , NOx:

, CC: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Asphalt of Tar Kettles.

Location (city, county or statewide):

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

S. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.

7. NA1QS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice standards, averaging times

test procedures and/or
11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.

I
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP coMpr. 1ETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. No new rule.

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-701 thru

709 (Article 7) Nonferrous smelter orders.

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , SOx: , VOC:

, NOx:

, CO: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources:

Location (city, county or statewide):

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Rule deleted, obsolete.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: N/A.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: N/A.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or recordkeeping/reporting requirements: N/A
11. Special economic/tecological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): N/A.

12. Other comments: None.