alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gottleib Neumeister, Appellant, *v.*Charles C. Palmer, Respondent.

March 23, 1880.

"Where premises are rented, by an oral contract, for one month, to end on a day named, a failure to deliver up possession on that day will not, in the absence of any evidence of a new contract, or of the receipt of rent for the new month, raise the presumption of a new contract to keep the premises for another month at the same rent.

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court.

*Affirmed.*

Gottschalk, for the appellant:

Where a tenant holds •over after the term • fixed by oral contract, he is liable for another month’s rent. — *Prentiss*v. *Warne,*10 Mo. 604; *Kerr*v. *Clark,*19 Mo. 134; *Livermore*v. *Eddy,*33 Mo. 550. A surrender of the premises by the tenant is necessary to discharge him. A mere vacation of the premises will not suffice. *—Baconv. Brown,*9 Conn. 334; *Quinette*v. *Carpenter,*35 Mo. 504; *Finney*v. *City,*39 Mo. 181; *St. Louis & Iron Mountain R. Co.*v. *Ludwig,*6 Mo. App. 584; *Ames*v. *Schuessler,*14 Ala. 600 ; *Harkins*v. *Pope,*10 Ala. 498 ; *Hammon*v. *Douglas,*50 Mo. 437.

Hayden, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action to recover $16, rent of a house in the city of St. Louis for the month of November, 1878. Under the original parol letting, the defendant had paid $16 a month in advance for six months, up to and including September, 1878. In September the defendant told the plaintiff’s agent that he, the defendant, would move in October, 1878 ; and the agent, waiving notice, consented that the tenancy should terminate on October 1st. On the 28th of September, the plaintiff told the defendant he might take the house for a month, paying $16 in advance, and remaining till the first day of November; or that if defendant left the premises before the month expired, there should be a *492contingent deduction. The defendant agreed, paid $16 for October, and remained until the 1st of November, not delivering the keys, however, until the 5th of November. On this the plaintiff demanded, and now sues for the rent for November.

It is obvious that the plaintiff, relying as he did on the previous hirings as raising an implied contract to pay $16 rent for November, had no case, and was pi’operly non-suited. If the mere- non-delivery of the keys raised any implied contract, it was not to pay $16-for the month, but-to pay for use and occupation for the time the premises were actually held. *Ibbs*v. *Richardson,*1 Per. *&*Dav. 618. The previous agreement was a parol agreement for a time fixed, and the inference thence of a hiring for an entire-month at the same rate would be absurd. There must be-something else to show the existence of a new contract. *Waring*v. *King,*8 Mee. *& W.*574. Here was no written lease, the terms of which were exteuded by payment or othérwise. 50 Mo. 437 ; 39 Mo. 181; 35 Mo. 504. The. statutory provisions as to agreements for the renting of town tenements, not in writing, being tenancies from month to-month, is a provision of law, and is not to be confused with such facts as raise an implied contract. The judgment is affirmed.

Judge Bakewell concurs; Judge Lewis is-absent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WENGE ZHANG, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 10-70857 Agency No. A088-128-587
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted January 9, 2014 Pasadena, California Before: W. FLETCHER, M. SMITH, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 1. The Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) adverse credibility determination is supported by substantial evidence. The BIA identified two specific inconsistencies, both of which ar e supported by the record. First, Zhang said Li was a “repeat” customer in his written statement, but during his testimony said Li was a first-time customer. Sec ond, Zhang described the painting he saw in 

# FILED
JAN 23 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.Page 2 of 2 Li’s home as depicting a person nailed on a cross in his written statement, but during his testimony described it as depicti ng a person with a cross above his head. Given these inconsistencies, which are not “trivial,” see Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1043 (9th Cir. 2010), we are not “compelled to conclude” that the adverse credibility determination was in error. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B). 2. The record does not support Zhang’s claim that he was denied an impartial adjudicator. At most, the record shows that the immigration judge may have been impatient with Zhang during hi s hearing testimony. But “expressions of impatience, dissatisfaction, annoyance, and even anger,” without more, are insufficient to establish bias or partiality. Liteky v. United States , 510 U.S. 540, 555–56 (1994). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 99.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


          I,  Daniel S. Shaffer, CEO of Shaffer Asset Management, Inc. General
          Partner of the Shaffer Diversified Fund, LP (the "Company"), certify,
          pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
          section 1350, that:

          1)  The Quarterly Report on form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
              period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with
              the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

          2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



         Date: January 28, 2003



                                           Shaffer Diversified Fund, LP


                                           By: Shaffer Asset Management, Inc.

                                               General Partner

                                            By:
                                               /s/ Daniel S. Shaffer
                                               ------------------------------
                                               Daniel S. Shaffer
                                               Chief Executive Officer

                                               President/Secretary/Director
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 16, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00911

- CR

Kevin DIXON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR6291

Honorable Mark R. Luitjen

, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on January 16, 2019

.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of January, 2019

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
Exhibit  32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Glen Manor Resources Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended October 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Albert Folsom, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                                  /s/ "Albert  Folsom"
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Albert Folsom
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  Secretary and Director

Date: February 7, 2006
#### 852.246-73 Noncompliance with Packaging, Packing, and/or Marking Requirements.

As prescribed in 846.370-3, insert the following clause:

# Noncompliance With Packaging, Packing and/or Marking Requirements (OCT 2018)

Failure to comply with the packaging, packing and/or marking requirements indicated herein, or incorporated herein by reference, may result in rejection of the merchandise and request for replacement or repackaging, repacking, and/or marking. The Government reserves the right, without obtaining authority from the Contractor, to perform the required repackaging, repacking, and/or marking services and charge the Contractor at the actual cost to the Government for the same or have the required repackaging, repacking, and/or marking services performed commercially under Government order and charge the Contractor at the invoice rate. In connection with any discount offered, time will be computed from the date of completion of such repackaging, repacking and/or marking services.

(End of Clause)

[83 FR 48262, Sept. 24, 2018]
Exhibit 21.1
  Name of Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of Incorporation/CharterBank Mutual (1)
    
    USAFirst Northern Investments, Inc. (2)
    
    NevadaBancMutual Financial & Insurance Services, Inc. (2)
    
    WisconsinMC Development LTD (2)
    
    WisconsinMutual Investment Corporation (2)
    
    Nevada
 
 (1)
    
    Direct subsidiary of the Company.(2)
    
    Direct subsidiary of the Bank.  Name of Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of Incorporation/CharterSavings Financial Corporation (3)
    
    WisconsinArrowood Development LLC (4)
    
    Wisconsin
 
 (3)
    
    50% owned subsidiary of the Bank.(4)
    
    50% owned subsidiary of MC Development LTD.
#### Sheridan Electric Sign Service, plaintiff in error, v. Sam Kerman, defendant in error.

#### Gen. No. 34,481..

Opinion filed March 24, 1931.

Walter P. Murphy .and Robert L. Floyd, for plaintiff in error.

Louis J. Victor, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10554 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10554

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress annual reports 
  on medical malpractice claims by members of the uniformed services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2024

  Ms. Porter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress annual reports 
  on medical malpractice claims by members of the uniformed services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pentagon Medical Malpractice Claims 
Reporting Act''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORTS ON MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CLAIMS BY MEMBERS OF THE 
              UNIFORMED SERVICES.

    Subsection (i) of section 2733a of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(i) Annual Reports.--Not less frequently than annually until 
2028, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed 
Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a report on 
claims processed under this section that includes, with respect to the 
period covered by the report, the following:
            ``(1) The number of claims processed under this section.
            ``(2) The average timeline for resolving such claims.
            ``(3) The resolution of each such claim.
            ``(4) The number of claims that were denied based on the 
        claim not meeting one or more requirement specified in 
        subsection (b) (other than for not being substantiated pursuant 
        to paragraph (6)), disaggregated by each such requirement.
            ``(5) Any other information that the Secretary determines 
        may enhance the effectiveness of the claims process under this 
        section.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,417-03

EX PARTE PRENTICE LESTER DAIGLE, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1390244-B IN THE 263 DISTRICT COURT RD

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals dismissed his direct appeal for

lack of jurisdiction. Daigle v. State, No. 14-13-01091-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14 Dist] Dec. 19, th

2013)(not designated for publication).

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and

conclusions of law.
2

The trial court has determined that counsel failed to timelyfile a notice of appeal or otherwise

secure Applicant’s appellate rights. Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369, 374 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988).

We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment

of conviction in Cause No. 1390244-B from the 263 District Court of Harris County. Applicant rd

is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then,

with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion,

the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to

be represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent

Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed

on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to

prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court

within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues. Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. 

Ex Parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: November 20, 2019

Do not publish
#### Joyce Fasano, an Infant, by Her Father and Guardian ad Litem, Andrew L. Fasano, et al., Appellants, v. City of New York, Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by the infant plaintiff, and to recover damages for loss of services and medical expenses, in which a compromise settlement had -been approved -by the court, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 17, 1964, which denied their motion to vacate the settlement and to restore the action *800to the General Calendar for trial. Order reversed on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs; motion granted; settlement vacated and action directed to be restored to the General Calendar for trial. It appears that the plaintiffs at no time consented to the settlement entered into by their attorney; nor were plaintiffs or either of them consulted with respect thereto. It further appears that upon learning of the settlement the infant’s father and guardian ad litem objected to it on the ground that it was inadequate. Under such circumstances a party is not bound by a settlement stipulation entered into by his attorney *(Bruder*v. *Schwartz,*260 App. Div. 1048; *Silver*v. *Parkdale Bake Shop,*8 A D 2d 607). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1129 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to revise regulations 

to remove the requirement under the Medicare program that an offcampus facility or organization shall be located within a 35-mile radius 

of a hospital or critical access hospital. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2023 

Mr. GREEN of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

revise regulations to remove the requirement under the 

Medicare program that an off-campus facility or organization shall be located within a 35-mile radius of a 

hospital or critical access hospital. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may cited as the ‘‘Rural ER Access Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1129 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVING LOCATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE 

2 MEDICARE PROGRAM APPLICABLE TO OFF3 CAMPUS FACILITIES OR ORGANIZATIONS. 

4 Not later than 60 days after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human 

6 Services shall revise section 413.65(e)(3)(i) of title 42, 

7 Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulation), 

8 to remove the requirement under the Medicare program 

9 that an off-campus facility or organization shall be located 

10 within a 35-mile radius of the campus of a hospital or 

11 critical access hospital that is the potential main provider 

12 to meet the location requirements to be eligible for pro13 vider-based status. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Highlights of the 2012 National Youth Gang Survey      

# Highlights of the 2012 National Youth Gang Survey

Conducted by the National Gang Center, the National Youth Gang Survey uses data from a large, representative sample of local law enforcement agencies to track the size and scope of the national youth gang problem. This fact sheet highlights the findings of the 2012 National Youth Gang Survey (PDF, 4 pages), including trends in gang activity, gang membership designation, and antigang measures. 

http://www.ojjdp.gov/pubs/248025.pdf?utm_source=FindYouthInfo&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

The Estate of John G. Guyaux and :

Mirian V. Guyaux, Deceased, and :

Gary Guyaux and Christy :

Guyaux, Heirs :

:

v. : No. 627 C.D. 2018

:

Township of North Fayette :

:

Appeal of: Christy Guyaux :

O R D E R

NOW, June 27, 2019

, having considered appellant ’ s application for

reargument and appellee’s answer in response thereto , the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

P resident Judge
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Slideshow: 5 Collaborations to Ensure Trauma-Informed Care for Youth and Families      

# Slideshow: 5 Collaborations to Ensure Trauma-Informed Care for Youth and Families

This slideshow highlights five types of professionals that runaway and homeless youth program managers can collaborate with to support youth who have experienced trauma. 

http://ncfy.acf.hhs.gov/media-center/slideshows/5-collaborations-ensure-trauma-informed-care-youth-and-families?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
#### In re NIAGARA, L. & O. POWER C

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Four Department.

March 21, 1906.)

In the matt of the application of the Niagara, Lockport Ontario Power Company relating to acquirii title to certain lands of Rosalie Flaka;

I opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to tl Court of Appeals granted, and question certifi to that court for review. See 97 N. Y. Sup 853.