alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Arthur T. Botsas, Appellant, v Abraham C. Grossman et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Arthur T. Botsas, Appellant, v Western Queens Community Hospital et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

[776 NYS2d 519]

In two related actions, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), dated August 14, 2002, which denied his motion to restore Action No. 1 to the trial calendar, (2), as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the same court (Milano, J.), dated September 6, 2002, which, among other things, denied those branches of his motion which were to direct the defendants in Action No. 1 to respond to interrogatories and to strike their answer and granted that branch of their cross motion which was to vacate the interrogatories served upon them, and (3), as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the same court also dated September 6, 2002, which, inter alia, denied those branches of his motion which were to direct the defendants in Action No. 2 to respond to interrogatories and to strike their answer and granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendants in Action No. 2 which was to vacate the interrogatories served upon them.

Ordered that the order dated August 14, 2002, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the orders dated September 6, 2002, are affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion to restore one of two related actions to the trial calendar pending completion of discovery in the companion action *(see Small v New York City Health &*
      *655
      *Hosps. Corp.,*306 AD2d 269 [2003]; *Maragos v Getty Petroleum Corp.,*303 AD2d 652 [2003]).

The interrogatories submitted to the defendants in these companion actions, which contained multiple subparts and references to other documents, were patently overbroad and improper *(see EIFS, Inc. v Morie Co.,*298 AD2d 548 [2002]; *Bettan v Geico Gen. Ins. Co.,*296 AD2d 469, 471 [2002]). Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the plaintiffs motions which were to compel the defendants to respond to the interrogatories and to strike their answers and vacated the interrogatories *(see Mangiapane v Brookhaven Beach Health Related Facility,*305 AD2d 642 [2003]; *Mabey v Winthrop Univ. Hosp.,*302 AD2d 371 [2003]; *Bettan v Geico Gen. Ins. Co., supra).*

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.
#### § 1033.50 Class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing factors.

See § 1000.50.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# SAMHSA's 2015–2018 Strategic Plan

SAMHSA’s new strategic plan, Leading Change 2.0: Advancing the Behavioral Health of the Nation 2015-2018, outlines how SAMHSA will continue to increase awareness and understanding of mental and substance use disorders, expand prevention efforts, promote emotional health and wellness, increase access to effective treatment, and support recovery. The plan outlines six strategic initiatives for meeting SAMHSA’s mission, new and existing goals, and vision. The plan was developed with input from SAMHSA’s Executive Leadership Team and staff, a diverse group of stakeholders, and the public. 

http://store.samhsa.gov/product/PEP14-LEADCHANGE2?WT.mc_id=EB_20141001_PEP14-LEADCHANGE2&utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
) 1

•

c

48" DIA x302 5W HEIGHT, 88 ORlACES

EMISSION CONTROL DEVICE

>98% TVoe ORE, CERTIAED USEPA 40 CFR

60, APPENDIX A, SOURCE EMMISIONS TEST

METHODS REfERENCED. MEETS AU. EPA &

CDPHE REGULATIONS.

DESTROYS OIl/CONDENSATE PROOUCTION

TANK VAPORS WI NO VlSIBLE RAME.

EXCElLENT OPACITY AND SMOKElESS

OPERATION.

REUABLE AND CUSTOMIZABLE IGNITION.

VERY LOW CAPITAl AND OPERATING COST.

EASY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN.

WILL DESTROY UP TO 150 MCFO @ 10 ozlin l

•

RRON

I~

"'" DeC

• •

AIftt:Nf!J fOIl A.SJU CXlOf. IKI10II YIlI ON I

ED _IV Ql',--

erMA

• IXXIl

.tQE5

A
#### Arthur J. Lehmann, a minor, by Martha Lehmann, his mother and next friend, appellee, v. City of Chicago, appellant.

Gen. No. 34,571.

Opinion filed May 13, 1931.

Samuel A. Ettelson, Corporation Counsel, and William D. Saltiel, City Attorney, for appellant; Samuel L. Golan and Kathryn M, Bar*651asa, Assistant City Attorneys, and Roy S. Gaskill, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel.

Charles G. Palmer, for appellee; Clyde C. Fisher, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Friend

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 99.4


                      Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350
                  of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code
                  --------------------------------------------


         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of PECO Energy Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002,
that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of PECO Energy Company and its
subsidiaries.



Date:  August 6, 2002               /s/ Kenneth G. Lawrence
                                    -----------------------
                                    Kenneth G. Lawrence
                                    President (Chief Executive Officer)
                                    PECO Energy Company
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Event: National STEM Festival      

# Event: National STEM Festival

**Date:**April 11—13, 2024 **Location:** The Square, 1850 K St., NW, Washington, DC 

The National STEM Festival is dedicated to showcasing innovative student solutions to urgent global challenges. This event will celebrate student achievements in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics across six themes: 
                  -  Environmental Stewardship  
                  -  Future Foods  
                  -  Health and Medicine  
                  -  Powering the Planet  
                  -  Space Innovation  
                  -  Tech for Good  

**Learn more and register to receive updates about the agenda, featured speakers, and more.**
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           NDTAC Fact Sheet: Youth with Special Education Needs in Justice Settings      

# NDTAC Fact Sheet: Youth with Special Education Needs in Justice Settings

The fact sheet explores the prevalence of youth with special education needs within justice settings (PDF, 4 pages) and describes the characteristics of, and the challenges faced by, the facilities and schools serving these young people. 

https://neglected-delinquent.ed.gov/sites/default/files/NDTAC_Special_Ed_FS_508.pdf?utm_source=FindYouthInfo&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
- 45715.001
- 45715.002
- 45715.003
- 45715.004
- 45715.005
- 45715.006
- 45715.007
- 45715.008
- 45715.009
- 45715.010
- 45715.011
- 45715.012
- 45715.013
- 45715.014
- 45715.015
- 45715.016
- 45715.017
- 45715.018
- 45715.019
- 45715.020
- 45715.021
- 45715.022
- 45715.023
- 45715.024
- 45715.025
- 45715.026
- 45715.027
- 45715.028
- 45715.029
- 45715.030
- 45715.031
- 45715.032
- 45715.033
- 45715.034
- 45715.035
- 45715.036
- 45715.037
- 45715.038
- 45715.040
- 45715.041
- 45715.042
- 45715.043
- 45715.044
- 45715.045
- 45715.046
- 45715.047
- 45715.048
- 45715.049
- 45715.050
- 45715.051
- 45715.052
- 45715.053
- 45715.054
- 45715.055
- 45715.056
- 45715.057
- 45715.058
- 45715.059
- 45715.060
- 45715.061
- 45715.062
- 45715.063
- 45715.064
- 45715.065
- 45715.066
- 45715.067
- 45715.068

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-02-15T00:00:07-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### § 1007.80 Transportation credit balancing fund.

The market administrator shall maintain a separate fund known as the *Transportation Credit Balancing Fund* into which shall be deposited the payments made by handlers pursuant to § 1007.81 and out of which shall be made the payments due handlers pursuant to § 1007.82. Payments due a handler shall be offset against payments due from the handler.
#### Joseph Falco et al., Appellants-Respondents, v G. E. S. Enterprises, Inc., et al., Respondents-Appellants.

— In an action, *inter alia,*to rescind a written lease, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 27,1977, as granted defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Defendants purport to cross-appeal from another portion of said order. Cross appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The cross appeal was not *694perfected in accordance with the rules of this court (see *Howe Ave. Nursing Home v Nafus,*54 AD2d 686). Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and defendants’ cross motion denied. The complaint seeks rescission for fraud in the inducement, not for breach of contract. As such, it properly states a cause of action (see *Mills Studio v Chenango Val. Realty Corp.,*15 AD2d 138). Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
EX-10.6(b)



 Exhibit 10.6(b) 
 June 1, 2012 
 Eckhardt Trading Company 

1314 North Dearborn Parkway 
 The Carriage House

 Chicago, Illinois 60610 
 Attention:
Ms. Audrey L. Gale 
 Re: Management Agreement Renewals 
 Dear Ms. Gale: 
 We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2013 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

  

	 	•	 	 CMF Eckhardt Master Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. 


  

	 	•	 	 Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II 


 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Brian Centner at the address above or fax to 212-296-6868. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-296-1290. 
 Very truly yours, 
 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Brian Centner

		 	Brian Centner
		 	Chief Financial Officer & Director

  

			
	ECKHARDT TRADING COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John D. Fornengo

	Print Name:	 	John D. Fornengo
	BC/sr
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the related
Form 10-Q financial statements for FirstEnergy Corp. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.  (Amounts in 1,000's, except
earnings per share).  Income tax expense includes $(4,999,000) related to other
income and $(21,208,000) related to extraordinary item.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001031296
<NAME> FIRSTENERGY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    9,077,552
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  2,567,520
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,174,903
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     5,403,076
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,223,051
<COMMON>                                        23,707
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    3,702,533
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            709,804
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               4,436,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          313,460
<PREFERRED>                                    660,195
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         6,606,324
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             228,470
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 119,980
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  518,674
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       21,404
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                62,848
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               5,255,652
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               18,223,051
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    3,893,795
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           237,656
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,842,848
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   3,106,711
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        787,084
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               9,961
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 797,045
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       450,348
<NET-INCOME>                                   316,175
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                        0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       253,017
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      515,805
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         797,740
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Juan JIMENEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-50144

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2007.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Philip J. Lynch, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Jimenez-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *petition for cert. filed*(Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the distinct court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 1160.102 Department.

*Department* means the United States Department of Agriculture.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0977

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM190AD

717-53A0036 --- 8/12/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1052 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the limitation 

on qualified first-time homebuyer distributions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Ms. VAN DUYNE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the limitation on qualified first-time homebuyer distributions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Uplifting First-Time 

5 Homebuyers Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASING THE LIMITATION ON QUALIFIED 

7 FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER DISTRIBUTIONS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 72(t)(8)(B)(i) of the In9 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$30,000’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1052 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this Act shall apply to taxable years beginning after De3 cember 31, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
(May 17, 2004)

#### Malik G. Abbas, Respondent, v Roy F. Cole, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 846]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.H.O.), entered August 12, 2003, which, following an inquest on the issue of damages, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $200,000.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new inquest on the issue of damages.

At an inquest on damages, a defaulting defendant is entitled to cross-examine the plaintiff’s witnesses, and to present testimony and evidence *(see Tamburello v Bensonhurst Car & Limo Serv.,*305 AD2d 664 [2003]; *Godwins v Coggins,*280 AD2d 582 [2001]). Here, the defendant was denied this opportunity when the Supreme Court, inter alia, admitted the plaintiff’s uncertified hospital records *(see*CPLR 4518 [c]) and unsworn medical reports *(see*CPLR 2106) into evidence over the defendant’s objection *(see Paige v Lucatorto,*292 AD2d 581 [2002]). Further, the errors were not harmless *(see Adkins v Queens Van-Plan,*293 AD2d 503 [2002]; *Aguirre v Long Is. R.R.*
      *650
      *Co.,*286 AD2d 658 [2001]). Thus, the defendant is entitled to a new inquest at which the plaintiff will be required to establish, through admissible evidence, his damages, if any *(see*Insurance Law § 5102; *Tamburello v Bensonhurst Car & Limo Serv., supra).*

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are academic or without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.