alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Spencer Shillingford et al., Respondents, v Albert G. Eckert et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 18,1979, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve and file an amended bill of particulars. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The amended bill of particulars does not seek to set forth new injuries, but merely expands upon "continuing * * * disabilities” alleged in the original bill of particulars. Thus, plaintiffs had a right to serve this amended bill of particulars (see CPLR 3043, subd [b]; L 1979, ch 590). Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
1 NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

No . 122,452

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

J EANINE J EFFERSON , Appell ant ,

v.

R ICKEY L. H OY , Appell ee

.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; S EAN M.A. H ATFIE L D , judge. Opinion filed February 26,
2021

. Affirmed

.

Jeanine Jefferson , appellant pro se

.

No appearance by appellee.

B efore H ILL , P.J., G ARDNER , J., and B URGESS , S.J.

P ER C URIAM : Jeanine Jefferson filed a small claims petition against Rickey Hoy claiming $3
, 000 for repayment of a loan and for not painting her car

. Her claim was denied for failure of proof

. She appealed to the district court

. The district court held a
bench trial de novo
, considered the evidence and testimony presented , and determined Jefferson presented insufficient evidence to prove her claim. Jefferson appealed to this

court

. We affirm.2

In this appeal, Jefferson contends that she provided sufficient documentation
showi ng Hoy did not complete the paint job on her vehicle as he was hired to do

. She does not cite to the record on appeal anywhere in her brief

. Hoy did not file a response.

When a district court finds that a party did not meet its burden of proof, as here, it is a negative factual finding. In reviewing a negative factual finding, the appellate court must determine whether the party challenging the finding can prove the district court arbitrarily disregarded undisputed evidence or relied upon some e xtrinsic consideration such as bias, passion, or prejudice to reach its decision. Cresto v. Cresto , 302 Kan. 820, 845, 358 P.3d 831 (2015) ; Birdsong v. Koch , No. 110,685, 2014 WL 2747734, at * 2 (Kan. App. 2014) (unpublished opinion) (applying negative find ing standard to small claims case)

. The burden is on the party making a claim to designate a record sufficient to present its points to the appellate court and to establish its claims. Friedman v. Kansas State Bd. of Healing Arts , 296 Kan. 636, 644, 294 P. 3d 287 (2013) . This court may presume that a factual statement made without reference to a volume and page number of the record has no support in the record on appeal. Supreme Court Rule 6.02(a)(4) (2020 Kan. S. Ct. R. 34).

Jefferson's factual statements are made without reference to the record on appeal. We therefore presume they have no support in the record and affirm the district court.

Affirmed.
NUMBER 13-14-00075-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ADAM WAYNE WALKER, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 36th District Court 

of San Patricio County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Adam Wayne Walker, attempts to appeal his conviction for sexual 

assault. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant 

has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
2

On February 5, 2014, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s 

certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certification.

On February 10, 2014, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s 

response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is 

incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed 

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 20th

day of February, 2014.
H

arquahalaMountains

(SCRMA)

Wickenburg

Harquahala

MountainsACEC

BlackButteACEC

Belmont/BigHorn

MountainsWHA

InnerBasin

Hummingbird

SpringsWilderness

BigHorn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

BureauofLandManagement

PhoenixDistrictOffice

Phoenix,AZ

October2006

Note:TheBureauofLandManagement(BLM)

conductslanduseplanningonlyintheareasadministered

byBLM.BLMhasnoplanningauthorityunderthe

municipalorcountyplanninglegislationoftheState

ofArizona.

NowarrantyismadebyBLMfortheuseofthismap

forpurposesnotintendedbyBLM,ortotheaccuracy,

reliabilityorcompletenessoftheinformationshown.

SpatialinformationmaynotmeetNationalMapAccuracy

standards.Thisinformationmaybeupdatedwithout

notification.

±

Note:LandStatuslegendlocatedonMap1-1

Map2-86

Harquahala

ManagementUnit

MultipleResourceAllocation&

SpecialAreaDesignations

AlternativeE

01234

Miles

BLMWilderness

Interstate

MajorRoad

MajorRiver,StreamsorWash

Highway

BradshawHarquahala

PlanningArea

ManagementUnit

ResourceAllocations

Wilderness

Characteristics

SpecialCulturalResource

ManagementArea

(SCRMA)-PublicUse

CountyBoundary

!"a$

Iv

LAPAZ COUNTY

MARICOPA COUNTY

Centennial

Wash

AreaofCritical

Environmental

Concern(ACEC)

SpecialAreaDesignation

WildlifeHabitat

Area(WHA)

RouteDesignationWithin

WildernessCharacteristic

andACEC

Close

Limited

Open
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Sustainable Schools and Green Strides Website      

# Sustainable Schools and Green Strides Website

On June 3rd, 2015 U.S. Department of Education Green Ribbon Schools, District Sustainability Awardees, and Postsecondary Sustainability Awardees received accolades at a ceremony in Washington, DC, for their sustainable, healthy facilities, wellness practices, and sustainability learning. At the event, Education Secretary Arne Duncan congratulated the honorees for their accomplishments and announced the re-launch of the Green Strides website. The new, user-friendly site serves as a one-stop shop for the resources that all schools can use to save money, improve health, and engage their students with authentic sustainability learning. 

http://www.greenstrides.org/?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=events-recent
#### Martin Rosenblum, Respondent, v. Shirley Wohl, Appellant.

In an action to recover a balance allegedly due for professional services, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated August 24, 1964, which denied her motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; motion granted; and complaint dismissed, without costs. In our opinion, the inordinate delay in the prosecution of this action to recover a balance of $700 for professional services was inexcusable. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-67530, No. 333-66682, No. 333-58142) pertaining to the 1996 U.S.
Stock Option Plan, as amended October 1999, 1999 Israeli Share Option Plan, 2000
U.S. Share Incentive Plan, 2000 Israeli Share Option Plan, 1997 Israeli Share
and Stock Option Incentive Plan and 2000 Employee Share Purchase Plan of
Verisity Ltd. of our report dated January 15, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Verisity Ltd. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.


                                                 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Palo Alto, California
March 22, 2002
(December 20, 1979)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gary Dabney, Appellant.

the court’s own motion its decision, dated December 3, 1979 is vacated and recalled and the following substituted decision is rendered: Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 8, 1977, convicting him of rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree, and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. On the instant facts the count charging sexual abuse is a lesser inclusory count of rape in the first degree. No evidence, independent of the rape, was presented to establish sexual abuse. Therefore, as the People concede, the conviction on the rape charge mandates reversal and dismissal of the sexual abuse charge (see CPL 300.40, subd 3, par [b]; *People v Davis,*72 AD2d 749). The defendant argues that prejudicial error occurred in the trial court’s exclusion of a hospital record which was said to contain exculpatory evidence relating to the use of force during the rape; in its permitting testimony regarding the defendant’s familiarity with karate; and in the charge on resistance. We agree that a portion of the hospital record was admissible for the limited purpose of impeaching the complainant’s testimony that her neck had been scratched by the defendant. However, we do not find that exclusion of the record amounted to prejudicial error, in light, of the testimony given by hospital personnel, who attended complainant in the emergency room, which corroborated the existence of a fresh scratch on her neck. Limited testimony given by a Y.M.C.A. supervisor, who had observed defendant practice karate, was probative of defendant’s actual knowledge of karate; as such, the testimony was relevant and admissible to establish a factual predicate for the complainant’s asserted fear of the defendant’s use of force against her. Finally, while the court’s charge to the jury on the issue of complainant’s resistance consisted of a reading of the statutory definition of forcible compulsion (see Penal Law, § 130.00, subd 8), we find *658that it sufficed to instruct the jury properly on the law applicable to the facts of this case. Damiani, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Rabin, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32-7

Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Exelon Generation
Company, LLC for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2004, that (i) the report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in
the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Exelon
Generation Company, LLC.

|                       |  |                                              
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Date: October 27, 2004 |  | /s/ JOHN F. YOUNG

    John F. YoungPresident
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Adams, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on October 13, 1976, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Birns, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan and Silverman, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Initial Launch of the Team Up for School Nutrition Success Training Program      

# Initial Launch of the Team Up for School Nutrition Success Training Program

Team Up for School Nutrition Success Training (Team Up) is a new pilot program that provides free, tailored training to schools on securing and providing healthy and delicious school meals to students. The program was developed in partnership with the USDA and the National Food Service Management Institute. The USDA also released a video in which first lady Michelle Obama promotes Team Up and praises the work of school food service professionals across the country.

http://blogs.usda.gov/2014/12/22/initial-launch-of-the-team-up-for-school-nutrition-success-training-program/?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
EXHIBIT 32.1


                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Form 10-QSB/A of MADISON EXPLORATIONS, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel
Haskins , Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: January 17, 2006


/s/ JOEL HASKINS
________________________________________
    Joel Haskins
    Chief Financial Officer and Director




A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906,  HAS BEEN  PROVIDED TO MADISON  EXPLORATIONS,  INC. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY MADISON  EXPLORATIONS,  INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KAISIM KEYES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 65 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KAISIM KEYES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 66 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of August, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### 928.103-3 Payment bonds.

A determination that is in the best interest of the Government to require payment bonds in connection with other than construction contracts may be made by the contracting officer on individual acquisitions.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1137 

To provide for working with allies to seek increased compliance by China 

with certain OECD export credit standards. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2023 

Mr. NUNN of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide for working with allies to seek increased compliance by China with certain OECD export credit standards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Neutralizing Unfair 

5 Chinese Export Subsidies Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WORKING WITH ALLIES TO ENSURE CHINA’S COM7 PLIANCE WITH OECD STANDARDS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Within 180 days after the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury 

10 shall submit to the Committee on Financial Services of 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1137 IH

1 the House of Representatives and the Committee on 

2 Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a de3 tailed strategy and timeline with respect to— 

4 (1) strengthening United States advocacy and 

5 cooperation with appropriate allies and partners to 

6 seek to ensure substantial compliance by China with 

7 the financial terms and conditions of the OECD Ar8 rangement on Officially Supported Export Credits; 

9 and 

10 (2) the goal described in section 11(a)(1) of the 

11 Export-Import Bank Reauthorization Act of 2012. 

12 (b) INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATIONS ON EXPORT

13 SUBSIDIES.— 

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 11(a)(1) of the Ex15 port-Import Bank Reauthorization Act of 2012 (12 

16 U.S.C. 635a–5(a)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘with 

17 the possible goal of eliminating, before the date that 

18 is 10 years after the date of the enactment of the 

19 Export-Import Bank Reform and Reauthorization 

20 Act of 2015,’’ and inserting ‘‘with the goal of elimi21 nating, before the date that is 10 years after the 

22 date of the enactment of the Neutralizing Unfair 

23 Chinese Export Subsidies Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1137 IH

1 (2) PROGRESS REPORT.—Section 11(e) of such 

2 Act (12 U.S.C. 635a–5(e)) is amended by striking 

3 ‘‘2019’’ and inserting ‘‘2029’’. 

4 (3) CONDUCT OF NEGOTIATIONS.—Section 11 

5 of such Act (12 U.S.C. 635a–5) is amended— 

6 (A) in each of subsections (a) and (d), by 

7 striking ‘‘The President’’ and inserting ‘‘The 

8 Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with 

9 the United States Trade Representative,’’; 

10 (B) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘, and 

11 endeavor to hold not less frequently than twice 

12 per year,’’ before ‘‘negotiations’’; 

13 (C) in each of subsections (b), (c), and (e), 

14 by striking ‘‘President’’ each place it appears 

15 and inserting ‘‘Secretary of the Treasury’’; and 

16 (D) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘, and 

17 endeavor to hold such negotiations not less fre18 quently than twice per year’’ before the period. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00350-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.F., J.F., L.F.,

AND W.F., CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 1

of Parker County (CIV-09-0919)

May 1, 2019

Opinion by Justice Pittman

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s order. We modify the “Cumulative Judgment on 

Arrearages of Non-Support Provisions” (the judgment on the student-loan arrearage) 

to reflect the amount of $4,709.89 instead of $4,796.39. It is ordered that the trial 

court’s “Order Enforcing Child Support Order with Commitment Suspended”—

modified by our opinion and judgment in Cause No. 02-18-00415-CV—is affirmed as 

modified herein.
It is further ordered that Appellant Mother shall pay all of the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mark T. Pittman_________________

 Justice Mark T. Pittman