alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.43

AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Reference is made to the Employment Agreement dated as of April 16, 2002 (the "Employment Agreement") entered into between American Spectrum
Realty, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Company") and Patricia A. Nooney ("Executive"). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment
Agreement.

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to the Employment Agreement;

WHEREAS,
the Company and Executive desire to enter into this amendment to the Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") to modify certain of the terms thereof;

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements herein made and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree to amend the Employment Agreement as
follows:

1.     The
description of Executive's position with the Company in paragraph 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to provide that from and after
October 16, 2003, Executive shall be Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

2.     The
expiration of the Term (as defined in paragraph 2 of the Employment Agreement) of Executive's employment is hereby extended for one additional year beyond the
current expiration provided for in the Employment Agreement.

3.     Executive's
Base Salary (as defined in paragraph 3a. of the Employment Agreement) is hereby increased to $200,000 annually as of October 16, 2003.

4.     Except
as expressly amended hereby, the provisions of the Employment Agreement are and shall remain in full force and effect.

5.     This
Amendment shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of California without regard to conflicts of laws. This Amendment may be executed on
one or more counterparts, all of which taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment on this 6th day of October 2003.

| |  | AMERICAN SPECTRUM REALTY, INC.          
| |  | ----------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                     
| |  | /s/ Patricia A. NooneyPATRICIA A. NOONEY

---
##### 



CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Stephen W. LilienthalStephen W. LilienthalChief Executive Officer  102
#### Vincent Finnegan, Appellant, v Nazeema Gabriel et al., Respondents.

[777 NYS2d 206]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated March 24, 2003, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). The affirmation of the plaintiffs physician submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. The physician failed to explain a gap of 11⁄2 years in the plaintiffs treatment, did not account for injuries related to the plaintiff’s subsequent motor vehicle accident, failed to identify the objective tests he used to determine the limitations in the plaintiffs range of motion, and relied on an unsworn magnetic resonance imaging report *(see Allyn v Hanley,*2 AD3d 470 [2003]; *Smith v Askew,*264 AD2d 834 [1999]; *Kauderer v Penta,*261 AD2d 365, 366 [1999]).

Accordingly, the defendants were properly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
#### § 1030.77 Adjustment of accounts.

See § 1000.77.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Product Recalls      

# Resource: Product Recalls

This webpage serves as a "one stop shop" for U.S. Government recalls. The webpage contains the latest federal recall information for toys, cosmetics, food, and other products. **Learn more.**
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 16, 2019

No. 04-18-00911-CR

Kevin DIXON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR6291

Honorable Mark R. Luitjen, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK 

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on January 16, 2019.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of January, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

     Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities
                     Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350

                                   ----------

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of ELECTRONIC SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
(the "Report"), I, Philip Yee, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                /s/ Philip Yee
                                ------------------------------------------------
Dated: April 8, 2008            Philip Yee
                                Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### 935.071 Contract clause.

The contracting officer must insert the clause at 952.235-71, Research Misconduct, in contracts, including management and operating contracts, that involve research.

[70 FR 37015, June 28, 2005]
§ 1147.204 Prohibitions. ( a ) *Prohibition in general.* An eligible distributor receiving eligible dairy products donated under the Dairy Donation Program may not sell the donated dairy products back into commercial markets.
( b ) *Prohibition on marketing or promotional event.* Dairy products donated in conjunction with a marketing or promotional event are prohibited from reimbursement.
( c ) *Prohibition on profit-making.* An eligible dairy organization cannot make a profit from reimbursements received from the Dairy Donation Program.
( d ) *Prohibition on future participation.* An eligible partnership that AMS determines has violated the prohibition in paragraph (a), (b), or (c) shall not be eligible for any future participation in the Dairy Donation Program.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Jerry M. Keepers, M.D., Eric Kay-Fung Chan, M.D., and Vista 

Community Medical Center, LLP d/b/a Surgery Specialty Hospitals of 

America v. Michael Smith and Valerie Smith

Appellate case number: 01-20-00463-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-47101

Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: July 15, 2022

Party filing motion: Appellant

The en banc court has unanimously voted to deny the motion for en banc reconsideration

filed by appellant, Eric Kay-Fung Chan, M.D. It is ordered that the motion is denied.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Julie Countiss______

Acting for the En Banc Court*

*En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, 

Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.

Date: ___August 2, 2022____
#### MUSGRAVE PENCIL CO., INC., General Pencil Co., Inc., Sanford, L.P., and Rose Moon, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Three Star Stationery Industry Co., Ltd., Orient International Holding Shanghai Foreign Trade Corp., and China First Pencil Co., Ltd., Defendants, and Shandong Rongxin Import & Export Co., Ltd., Defendant.

No. 2007-1306.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 7, 2007.

*957George W. Thompson, Neville Peterson LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Of counsel was Casey K. Richter.

Loren Misha Preheim, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendantappellee, United States. Of counsel on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Acting Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Patricia M. McCarthy, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were Michele D. Lynch, Senior Counsel, and Ahran Kang, Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of Washington, DC. Of counsel was Elizabeth Thomas. Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, RADER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### Fred W. Neely, appellee, v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and Wm. T. Heinemann, defendants, on appeal of St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,411.

Opinion filed November 6, 1929.

Rehearing denied November 22, 1929.

J. B. Luse, for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Wilson

delivered the opinion of the court.
Jeremy Hintz 

Sensorflight, LLC 

3141 FM 3512 Aransas Pass, TX 78336 

Phone: 830-734-2346 

Fax: 361-758-7182 

Email: jhintz@sensorflight.com 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Change to 333 Exemption number 12531 to add four additional UAS 

The four additional UAS the petitioner requests to be added are; 

1) Aeryon SkyRanger (Reference FAA Exemption No. 111128} 

2) Precision Hawk Lancaster (Reference FAA Exemption No. 11345) 

3) SensFiy eBee (Reference FAA Exemption No. 11263} 

4) SkyCatch (Reference FAA Exemption No. 12201} 

Dear Sir or Ma'am, 

10 Nov 2015 

I request that the above referenced UAS platforms be added to our existing 333 Exemption No. 12531. 

Respectfully,
#### § 1007.16 Fluid cream product.

See § 1000.16.
§ 1.603 How are time periods computed? ( a ) *General.* Time periods are computed as follows: ( 1 ) The day of the act or event from which the period begins to run is not included.
( 2 ) The last day of the period is included. ( i ) If that day is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the period is extended to the next business day.
( ii ) The last day of the period ends at 5 p.m. at the place where the filing or other action is due.
( 3 ) If the period is less than 7 days, any Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday that falls within the period is not included.
( b ) *Extensions of time.* ( 1 ) No extension of time can be granted to file a request for a hearing under § 1.621, a notice of intervention and response under § 1.622, an answer under § 1.625, or any document under §§ 1.670 through 1.674.
( 2 ) An extension of time to file any other document under this subpart may be granted only upon a showing of good cause. ( i ) To request an extension of time, a party must file a motion under § 1.635 stating how much additional time is needed and the reasons for the request.
( ii ) The party must file the motion before the applicable time period expires, unless the party demonstrates extraordinary circumstances that justify a delay in filing.
( iii ) The ALJ may grant the extension only if: ( A ) It would not unduly prejudice other parties; and
( B ) It would not delay the decision under § 1.660.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Stop Overdose      

# Resource: Stop Overdose

This webpage provides information on several drug-related topics, including the following:  
                  -  Facts on fentanyl  
                  -  Polysubstance use facts  
                  -  Lifesaving naloxone  
                  -  Stigma reduction  
                  -  How to help someone recover  
                  -  Recovery is possible  

The page also contains implementation toolkits tailored for specific audiences at different opportunities for prevention. Additional resources are provided.**Learn more.**
#### § 1006.52 Adjusted Class I differentials.

See § 1000.52.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Grupo Aeroportuario, S.A.B. de C.V.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
     5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors
and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
    /s/ Adolfo Castro RivasAdolfo Castro RivasChief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joe Jones, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 857]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert G. Seewald, J.), rendered December 6, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 18 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). Two witnesses saw defendant draw a knife, and one of these witnesses was certain that defendant stabbed the victim. The jury was warranted in rejecting unreliable evidence suggesting that someone other than defendant stabbed the deceased.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
922.803 Responsibilities. ( a ) The Director, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs of the Department of Labor has been delegated authority and responsibility for carrying out the requirements of Executive Order 11246, as amended. In conjunction with the delegation, contracting officers shall be familiar with existing and any updated provisions of 41 CFR Ch. 60, and assist the Department of Labor in its compliance responsibilities. DOE contracting officers will include the applicable Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)) and Affirmative Action Program (AAP) requirements in their solicitations and obtain the applicable reports of compliance from the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) (when required) prior to awarding of contracts. The provisions of 41 CFR Ch. 60, are applicable to all DOE contracts.
( d ) The OFCCP requires that requests for pre-award clearances be directed to the OFCCP Regional Office in which the contractor's facility is (to be) located. If OFCCP finds the contractor in compliance, the contracting officer will be notified. Findings of non-compliance can be communicated to the contracting officer by the OFCCP or Headquarters Director or his designee. The appropriate Regional Office will provide the appropriate contact point in cases of non-compliance. The Director, Office of Civil Rights (DOE HQ), when requested, will provide assistance to contracting officers resolving non-compliance issues by providing assistance in obtaining a final decision from the OFCCP.
[49 FR 11998, Mar. 28, 1984; 49 FR 38951, Oct. 2, 1984, as amended at 58 FR 36365, July 7, 1993]
#### 970.3405 General requirements.
SMAL L COMMUNITY AIR SERVIC E DEVELOPMEN T PROGRA M 

DOCKE T DOT-OST-2012-0069 

SUMMARY INFORMATION 

A ll applicants must submit this information with their proposal, along with a completed form 

SF424 on www.grants.gov. 

A . APPLICAN T INFORMATION: (CHEC K AL L THA T APPLY ) 

~j\ Not a Consortium Q^j Interstate Consortium | [intrastate Consortium 

[ Community now receives EAS subsidy 

~j\ Community (or Consortium member) previously received a Small Community Grant 

If previous recipient: Date of grant: ^ 24 06 g 8-31-09 

X p j rat j o n

 ^ a t e 0 f g rant : 

Federal Funds Requested: $450 Thousand 

Carrier(s) Service Obtained: American Airlines, 1X Daily, Delta Airlines, 1X Daily 

Destination(s) Served: Dallas-Fort worth/Salt Lake City 

B. PUBLIC/PRIVAT E PARTNERSHIPS : (LIS T ORGANIZATION NAMES) 

PUBLI C PRIVAT E 

Montrose County !• Telluride Ski and Golf 

2

- Town of Telluride 2

- Telluride Mountain Village Visitor Center 

3

- City of Montrose Other Montrose and Telluride Business^ 

4

- Town of Mountain Village 4. 

5. 5. 

C. PROJEC T PROPOSAL: (CHEC K AL L THA T APPLY ) 

/ Marketing 

Travel Bank 

Surface Transportation 

Launch New Carrier 

I Study / 

Upgrade Aircraft 

Service Restoration 

Regional Service 

Start-up Cost Offset 

Secure Additional Service 

/ 

New Route 

Subsidy 

Revenue Guarantee 

First Service 

Other (explain below) 
D . EXISTIN G LANDIN G AID S AT LOCA L AIRPOR T 

Full ILS / 

/ Localizer 

/ Outer/Middle Marker 

Other (specify) 

J Published Instrument Approach 

E . PROJEC T COST : D O NOT ENTE R TEX T IN SHADED ARE A 

LIN E DESCRIPTIO N S U B TOTA L TOTA L AMOUN T 

1 Federal amount requested $500,000 

2 State cash financial contribution •••••••••••• • 

Local cash financial contribution 

3a Airport cash funds 

3b Non-airport cash funds $100,000 

3 Total local cash funds (3a + 3b) $100,000 

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING (1+2+3) $600,000 

In-Kind contribution 

5a Airport In-Kind contribution** 

5b Other In-Kind contribution** 

5 TOTAL IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION 

(5a + 5b) •••••••••••• • 

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST (4+5) $600,000 

F. IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS** 

For funds in lines 5a (Airport In-Kind contribution) and 5b (Other In-Kind contribution), please 

describe the source(s) of fund(s) for each. 
F . Is THI S APPLICATIO N SUBJEC T T O REVIE W B Y STAT E UNDE R EXECUTIV E ORDE R 12372 

PROCESS ? 

a. This application was made available to the state under the Executive Order 12372 

Process for review on (date) . 

b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not been selected by the state for review. 

[77] c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372. 

G . Is TH E APPLICAN T DELINQUEN T O N AN Y FEDERA L DEBT ? (I F "YES" , PROVID E 

EXPLANATION ) 

/ 

No
#### 750.7102 General policy.

Extra-contractual claims arising from foreign assistance contracts will be processed similarly to claims for extraordinary relief under FAR part 50, and in consideration of the circumstances and authorities granted by the Foreign Assistance Act.

[89 FR 4207, Jan. 23, 2024]