alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Elsie L. Nystrom, appellant, v. Albert H. Nystrom, appellee.

Gen. No. 34,691.

Opinion filed March 24, 1931.

Leslie H. Whipp, for appellant.

David J. Bentail, for appellee,

Mr, Justice Kerner

delivered the opinion of the court,
c/J• 

PHANTOM PILOT TRAINING GUIDE 

Earning Your Stripes 

Learn More: www.dji.com
#### § 1.213 How can I obtain official information or testimony relating to official information in response to my demand?

You must submit a demand in accordance with this subpart (*see United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951)). The appropriate Department official, in consultation with the Office of the General Counsel, will consider your demand in accordance with this subpart. The Counsel to the Inspector General will consider and make any final determinations regarding all demands seeking official information or employee testimony from the Office of Inspector General.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 115 

AN ACT 

To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, to provide 

for en bloc consideration in resolutions of disapproval 

for ‘‘midnight rules’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 115 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Midnight Rules Relief 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EN BLOC CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS OF 

5 DISAPPROVAL PERTAINING TO ‘‘MIDNIGHT 

6 RULES’’. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 801(d) of title 5, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(4) In applying section 802 to rules described under 

11 paragraph (1), a joint resolution of disapproval may con12 tain one or more such rules if the report under subsection 

13 (a)(1)(A) for each such rule was submitted during the 

14 final year of a President’s term.’’. 

15 (b) TEXT OF RESOLVING CLAUSE.—Section 802(a) 

16 of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

17 (1) by inserting after ‘‘resolving clause of which 

18 is’’ the following: ‘‘(except as otherwise provided in 

19 this subsection)’’; and 

20 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘In the 

21 case of a joint resolution under section 801(d)(4), 

22 the matter after the resolving clause of such resolu23 tion shall be as follows: ‘That Congress disapproves 

24 the following rules: the rule submitted by the ll 

25 relating to ll; and the rule submitted by the ll 

26 relating to ll. Such rules shall have no force or 
3 

•HR 115 EH

1 effect.’ (The blank spaces being appropriately filled 

2 in and additional clauses describing additional rules 

3 to be included as necessary).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 

2024. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 115 

AN ACT 

To amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, 

other purposes. of disapproval for ‘‘midnight rules’’, and for to provide for en bloc consideration in resolutions
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has det ermined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 98-20361

___________________________ In The Matter Of: Dennis Maurer; Brenda Maurer,
Debtors.

---------------------------------------------------

Dennis & Brenda Maurer, Debtors-Appellants,

versus Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, Appellee.

___________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(H-97-CV-2098)

___________________________________________________ April 15, 1999 Before GARWOOD, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Our review of the record in this case discloses that the evidence is insuffici ent to compel a finding that either Lisa Hastings--an employee of the Texas Attorney General--or the Texas Attorney General was the agent for the Texas Comptroller such that notice to Lisa Hastings constituted notice to the Texas Comptroller. Because the bankruptcy court did not err in finding that the2

Texas Comptroller General failed to receive adequate notice of the bar date, the court did not err in extending the bar date for the
Texas Comptroller to file his claim, and the district court did not err in affirming the extension of the bar date.
AFFIRMED.
§ 1.164 Answer. ( a ) *Filing and service.* Within 20 days after service of the complaint, or such other time as may be specified therein, the respondent shall file with the Hearing Clerk, an answer, signed by the respondent or the respondent's attorney. The answer shall be served upon the complainant by the Hearing Clerk.
( b ) *Contents.* The answer shall clearly admit, deny, or offer an explanation in response to each of the allegations of the complaint, and shall clearly set forth any affirmative defense.
( c ) *Default.* Failure to file an answer shall constitute an admission of the allegations in the complaint, and may be the basis for a decision upon the presentation of a *prima facie* case by the complainant.
[45 FR 6587, Jan. 29, 1980, as amended at 60 FR 8457, Feb. 14, 1995]
#### § 1030.86 Deduction for marketing services.

See § 1000.86.
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report of Thomas Equipment, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Clifford M. Rhee, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



Date:  September 28, 2005                By: /s/ CLIFFORD M. RHEE
                                         --------------------------------------
                                             Clifford M. Rhee
                                             President
8.1104 Contract clauses. Insert the following clauses in solicitations and contracts for leasing of motor vehicles, unless the motor vehicles are leased in foreign countries: ( a ) The clause at 52.208-4, Vehicle Lease Payments.
( b ) The clause at 52.208-5, Condition of Leased Vehicles.
( c ) The clause at 52.208-6, Marking of Leased Vehicles.
( d ) A clause substantially the same as the clause at 52.208-7, Tagging of Leased Vehicles, for vehicles leased over 60 days (see subpart B of 41 CFR part 102-34).
( e ) The provisions and clauses prescribed elsewhere in the FAR for solicitations and contracts for supplies when a fixed-price contract is contemplated, but excluding— ( 1 ) The clause at 52.211-16, Variation in Quantity;
( 2 ) The clause at 52.232-1, Payments;
( 3 ) The clause at 52.222-20, Contracts for Materials, Supplies, Articles, and Equipment; and
( 4 ) The clause at 52.246-16, Responsibility for Supplies.
[48 FR 42129, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 19714, May 30, 1986; 60 FR 48237, Sept. 18, 1995; 68 FR 28080, May 22, 2003; 79 FR 24199, Apr. 29, 2014; 84 FR 19844, May 6, 2019; 85 FR 27090, May 6, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
unaudited consolidate financial statements of Champion Industries, Inc.
and Subsidiaries for the period ending January 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,596,479
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,183,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                   886,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,861,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,833,832
<PP&E>                                      28,401,797
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,426,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,541,247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,038,130
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,104,714
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,404,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,541,247
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,397,866
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,129,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,269,160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             181,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,280,640
<INCOME-TAX>                                   539,392
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   741,248
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
#### 970.0371-9 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 970.5203-3, Contractor's Organization, in all management and operating contracts. The approval authority of the Secretary of Energy required in paragraph (c) may not be delegated. In paragraph (a) the words “and managerial personnel (see 970.5245-1(j))” may be inserted after “(see 952.215-70)”.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36370, July 22, 2009]
Exhibit 10.5


 





AMENDMENT TO THE


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


  


This Amendment (“Amendment”)
is entered into as of the 22nd day of May 2017, by and between Home Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) and Scott A.
Ridley (the “Executive”).


 


WITNESSETH


 


WHEREAS, the
Bank and the Executive previously entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2014 (the “Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS, the
parties desire to amend the Agreement in order to extend its term, as provided in Section 2(b) thereof.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:


 


 1. The last sentence in Section 2(a) of the Agreement is amended and restated to read as follows: “The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be and remain in effect during the period beginning on the Effective Date of this Agreement and ending on June 22, 2019, plus such extensions, if any, as are provided pursuant to Section 2(b) hereof (the “Employment Period”).”




 


 2. Except to the extent expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue unmodified and shall remain in full force and effect.




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the day and year first written above.


 


	 	 	HOME BANK, N.A.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ John W. Bordelon
	 	 	John W. Bordelon
	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Scott A. Ridley
	 	 	Scott A. Ridley
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Observance: 2023 National Veterans and Military Families Month      

# Observance: 2023 National Veterans and Military Families Month

November is National Veterans and Military Families Month. The 2023 theme is, “Taking Care of Our Military Families.” This webpage contains an overview of National Veterans and Military Families Month as well as a video, podcasts, and resources on navigating parenting, adoption, family and relationship dynamics, and more. **Learn more.**
#### In re: Harvey P. SHORT, Petitioner.

No. 07-7015.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 24, 2007.

Decided: Nov. 1, 2007.

Harvey P. Short, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harvey P. Short petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting in three 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) actions. Our review of the district court docket sheets reveals that the district court held a status conference on several of Short’s cases, including these three, on October 4, 2007. Accordingly, because there has been recent significant action in the district court, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant Short’s motion to proceed in forma pauper-is. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
#### 9904.417-61 Interpretation. [Reserved]
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In connection with the Quarterly Report of Madison Explorations, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Gallo, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




















/s/ Joseph Gallo


Joseph Gallo


Chief Executive Officer




November 15, 2010






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In connection with the Quarterly Report of Madison Explorations, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Cozine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Steven Cozine


Steven Cozine


Chief Financial Officer




November 15, 2010
§ 1032.30 Reports of receipts and utilization. Each handler shall report monthly so that the market administrator's office receives the report on or before the 7th day after the end of the month, in the detail and on the prescribed forms, as follows: ( a ) Each handler that operates a pool plant pursuant to § 1032.7 shall report for each of its operations the following information: ( 1 ) Product pounds, pounds of butterfat, pounds of protein, pounds of solids-not-fat other than protein (other solids), and the value of the somatic cell adjustment pursuant to § 1000.50(p), contained in or represented by: ( i ) Receipts of producer milk, including producer milk diverted by the reporting handler, from sources other than handlers described in § 1000.9(c); and
( ii ) Receipts of milk from handlers described in § 1000.9(c);
( 2 ) Product pounds and pounds of butterfat contained in: ( i ) Receipts of fluid milk products and bulk fluid cream products from other pool plants;
( ii ) Receipts of other source milk; and
( iii ) Inventories at the beginning and end of the month of fluid milk products and bulk fluid cream products;
( 3 ) The utilization or disposition of all milk and milk products required to be reported pursuant to this paragraph; and
( 4 ) Such other information with respect to the receipts and utilization of skim milk, butterfat, milk protein, other nonfat solids, and somatic cell information, as the market administrator may prescribe.
( b ) Each handler operating a partially regulated distributing plant shall report with respect to such plant in the same manner as prescribed for reports required by paragraph (a) of this section. Receipts of milk that would have been producer milk if the plant had been fully regulated shall be reported in lieu of producer milk. The report shall show also the quantity of any reconstituted skim milk in route disposition in the marketing area.
( c ) Each handler described in § 1000.9(c) shall report: ( 1 ) The product pounds, pounds of butterfat, pounds of protein, pounds of solids-not-fat other than protein (other solids), and the value of the somatic cell adjustment pursuant to § 1000.50(p), contained in receipts of milk from producers; and
( 2 ) The utilization or disposition of such receipts.
( d ) Each handler not specified in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section shall report with respect to its receipts and utilization of milk and milk products in such manner as the market administrator may prescribe.
#### RICHARDSON, Respondent, v. EDISON ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. OF BROOKLYN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by David P. Richardson against the Edison Electric Illuminating Company of Brooklyn.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### 639.107 Contract clause.
#### § 1001.77 Adjustment of accounts.

See § 1000.77.
**Exhibit 32-6** **Certificate    Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of    Title 18 United States Code**     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the quarterly    report on    Form 10-Q    of PECO Energy Company for the quarterly period ended    September 30, 2006, that (i) the report fully complies    with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information    contained in the report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of    PECO Energy Company. /s/  John    F. Young    John F. Young    Chief Financial Officer     Date: October 27, 2006
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AARON SANCHEZ-CAZARES, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-72736 

Agency No. A200-806-501 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 22, 2018**

Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Aaron Sanchez-Cazares, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal

and his request for a continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 29 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-72736 

review de novo questions of law and constitutional claims, and we review for 

abuse of discretion the agency’s denial of a continuance. Ahmed v. Holder, 569 

F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not err in denying cancellation of removal, where SanchezCazares admitted that he was convicted of a controlled substance violation. See 

Guerrero-Roque v. Lynch, 845 F.3d 940, 941 (9th Cir. 2017) (conviction for an 

offense listed in 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2) renders the applicant ineligible for 

cancellation of removal); 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) (listing offenses related to 

controlled substance violations).

As Sanchez-Cazares has not applied for asylum or withholding of removal, 

the agency did not err in declining to consider whether his crime was particularly 

serious. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and 

agencies are not required to reach non-dispositive issues).

The agency did not abuse its discretion or violate due process in denying for 

lack of good cause Sanchez-Cazares’s motion for a continuance, where he was 

ineligible for the relief he sought. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29; Sandoval-Luna v. 

Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1247 (9th Cir. 2008) (no good cause for continuance 

where relief from removal was not available); Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 

(9th Cir. 2000) (due process claims require showing that proceedings were “so 
3 16-72736 

fundamentally unfair that the alien was prevented from reasonably presenting his 

case” (internal citation omitted)).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0 1 07 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL ALLEN ZEIMER,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 18, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 11 2020

12/11/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0107