alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.647 What are the requirements for subpoenas and witness fees? ( a ) *Request for subpoena.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, any party may request by written motion that the ALJ issue a subpoena to the extent authorized by law for the attendance of a person, the giving of testimony, or the production of documents or other relevant evidence during discovery or for the hearing.
( 2 ) A party may request a subpoena for a senior Department employee only if the party shows: ( i ) That the employee's testimony is necessary in order to provide significant, unprivileged information that is not available from any other source or by less burdensome means; and
( ii ) That the employee's attendance would not significantly interfere with the ability to perform his or her government duties.
( b ) *Service.* ( 1 ) A subpoena may be served by any person who is not a party and is 18 years of age or older.
( 2 ) Service must be made by hand delivering a copy of the subpoena to the person named therein.
( 3 ) The person serving the subpoena must: ( i ) Prepare a certificate of service setting forth: ( A ) The date, time, and manner of service; or
( B ) The reason for any failure of service; and
( ii ) Swear to or affirm the certificate, attach it to a copy of the subpoena, and return it to the party on whose behalf the subpoena was served.
( c ) *Witness fees.* ( 1 ) A party who subpoenas a witness who is not a party must pay him or her the same fees and mileage expenses that are paid witnesses in the district courts of the United States.
( 2 ) A witness who is not a party and who attends a deposition or hearing at the request of any party without having been subpoenaed is entitled to the same fees and mileage expenses as if he or she had been subpoenaed. However, this paragraph does not apply to Federal employees who are called as witnesses by the Forest Service or another Department.
( d ) *Motion to quash.* ( 1 ) A person to whom a subpoena is directed may request by motion that the ALJ quash or modify the subpoena.
( 2 ) The motion must be filed: ( i ) Within 5 days after service of the subpoena; or
( ii ) At or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance, if that is less than 5 days after service of the subpoena.
( 3 ) The ALJ may quash or modify the subpoena if it: ( i ) Is unreasonable;
( ii ) Requires production of information during discovery that is not discoverable; or
( iii ) Requires disclosure of irrelevant, privileged, or otherwise protected information.
( e ) *Enforcement.* For good cause shown, the ALJ may apply to the appropriate United States District Court for the issuance of an order compelling the appearance and testimony of a witness or the production of evidence as set forth in a subpoena that has been duly issued and served.
Hearing, Briefing, and Decision
#### Robert Peare et al., Respondents, v Suffolk County Sewer Agency et al., Appellants.

— In an action, *inter alia,*(1) to declare invalid the exaction of deposits towards future sewer assessments and (2) for monetary relief, defendants appeal from an order, of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered October 18, 1977, which granted class action certification. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements (see *Ammon v Suffolk County,*67 AD2d 959). Titone, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cohalan, J.

dissents and votes to reverse the order and deny class action certification (see dissenting mem of Mr. Justice Cohalan in *Ammon v Suffolk County,*67 AD2d 959).
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Geology and mineral resourcesof the Honeybrook and Phoenixville quadrangles, Pennsylvania**
 
Report | Plate: 01
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:891
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:
 
October 30, 2018
#### 9904.402-10 [Reserved]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10558 

To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980 and the 

Housing Act of 1949 to make financial assistance available to DACA 

recipients, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2024 

Mr. VARGAS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Housing and Community Development Act 

of 1980 and the Housing Act of 1949 to make financial 

assistance available to DACA recipients, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DACA RECIPIENT ELIGIBILITY. 

4 Section 214(a) of the Housing and Community De5 velopment Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 1436a) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

7 end; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 10558 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(8) an alien who, on the date of the enactment 

5 of this Act, is the recipient of deferred action pursu6 ant to the memorandum of the Department of 

7 Homeland Security entitled ‘Exercising Prosecutorial 

8 Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to 

9 the United States as Children’ issued on June 15, 

10 2012.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 12

                      THE CIT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (Dollar Amounts In Millions)

                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                                 March 31,
                                                           --------------------
                                                            1998         1997

Net income                                                 $ 81.7       $70.1
Provision for income taxes                                   45.4        40.7
                                                           ------       -----
Earnings before provision for income taxes                  127.1       110.8
                                                           ------       -----

Fixed charges:
  Interest and debt expense on indebtedness                 244.6       223.1
  Minority interest in subsidiary trust holding solely
   debentures of the company                                  4.8         1.9
  Interest factor - one third of rentals on
   real and personal properties                               2.3         2.1
                                                           ------       -----
  Total fixed charges                                       251.7       227.1
                                                           ------       -----
    Total earnings before provision for income
     taxes and fixed charges                               $378.8       $337.9
                                                           ======       ======
Ratios of earnings to fixed charges                          1.50x        1.49x
#### State of New York, Respondent, v Charles W. Fenton, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered June 9, 1978 in Albany County, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in the amount of $215.50 with interest from May 5, 1971, and denied defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, and (2) from the judgment entered thereon. In January, 1971, defendant registered as a student at the State University of New York at Buffalo. The tuition and fees owed by defendant for attendance at the university amounted to $215.50. On May 5, 1971, defendant withdrew from the university and plaintiff commenced this action to recover defendant’s alleged unpaid tuition and fees. Both parties agree that service of a summons with notice was made on March 14, 1977, although there is disagreement as to whether or not there was personal service on the defendant. In his answer, defendant raised the Statute of Limitations as an affirmative defense as well as challenging the court’s jurisdiction based on allegedly defective service of the summons. Thereafter, Special Term granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint. This appeal ensued. Plaintiff correctly asserts that the relationship between defendant and the university was contractual in nature *(Anthony v Syracuse Univ.,*224 App Div 487). In an action arising from a contractual obligation, the Statute of Limitations is six years (CPLR 213; *Matter of Cromwell Towers Redevelopment Co. v City of Yonkers,*41 NY2d 1). The Statute of Limitations begins to run when a contract is breached or when one omits the performance of an obligation *(Edlux Constr. Corp. v State of New York,*252 App Div 373). According to the exhibits attached to the affidavit of the university in support of the motion for summary judgment, defendant’s tuition and fees became due and payable in full by February 19, 1971, or seven days after postmark date of billing and failure to attend class did not change payment due. Plaintiff’s cause of action accrued when the payment fell due (see *Haimes v Schonwit,*268 App Div 652). We conclude that the cause of action accrued and the Statute of Limitations began to run prior to March 14, 1971 and, therefore, plaintiff’s *952action is time barred. Accordingly, the order and judgment must be reversed and the complaint dismissed. In view of our resolution of the Statute of Limitations issue, we need not consider defendant’s remaining contention that questions of fact existed concerning the propriety of the service of the summons thereby precluding the granting of summary judgment. Order and judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and cross motion to dismiss the complaint granted, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.2






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Quamtel, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 333-162987 pertaining to its 2009 Equity Inventive Plan and No. 333-162988 pertaining to its 2009 Consulting Services Plan) of our report dated May 17, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Quamtel, Inc. as of December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.








/s/ RBSM LLP




New York, New York


May17, 2011
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Bruce S. MacDonaldBruce S. MacDonaldChief Financial Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates Program (EDGE)      

# Resource: Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates Program (EDGE)

NCES’s Education Demographic and Geographic Estimates program (EDGE) makes postsecondary school location data available through these data tools and web services: 
                  -  Geographic data homepage - This tool offers raw data files containing the coordinate points and other geospatial characteristics of postsecondary institutions.  
                  -  Open Data Site - This service allows users to view postsecondary institutions on a map of the United States, add the postsecondary institution data layer to existing maps, or download individual components of the data layer.  
                  -  Locale Lookup tool - This tool allows users to search for postsecondary schools and view them in the context of the NCES locale boundaries, a 12-category classification of cities, suburbs, towns, and rural areas.  

**Learn more.**
EXHIBIT TO MARCH 31, 2011, FORM 10-K/A-2 OF PCS EDVENTURES!.COM, INC.  Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of PCS Edventures!.com , Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A-2 for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Robert O. Grover, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:March 20, 2012By:/s/ Robert O. GroverRobert O. GroverCEO   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnish by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Aric W. HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant v. William CROWE, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-41268

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 5, 2008.

Aric W. Hall, Bullard, TX, pro se.

Leigh Campbell Porter, Wilson, Sheehy, Knowles, Robertson & Cornelius, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Having reviewed Appellant’s contentions, Appellee’s response, and the record *295on appeal, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# The Attorney General of Texas

December 28, 1979 MARK WHITE Attorney General
Mr.Evans N.Wents Opinion No. NW-120 Executive Director State Commission for the Blind Re: Whether the Blind P. 0. Box12866 Austin, Texas 78’711 Dear Mr.Wentx: Commission may maintain certain fun& outside the state treasury.

You inquire about the following rider to your appropriation which is included inthe current appropriations act:

Funds accruing to the Commission for the Blind from the operation of food vending facilities shall be deposited to the State Treasury and such funds are hereby appropriated General Appropriations Act, Acts 1979,66th Leg., ch. 843, art. IL Youask whether you must comply with this provision. The funds at issue derive from food vending machines operated by blind people on federal property. Federal law provides authorization for this program and directs the use of funds set aside from the net proceeds of the operation. 20U.S.C. SS107, 107b; 41 C.F.R. SSlOl-20.200 - 101-20.209. The Blind Commission administers the program for the state. Human Resources Code ch. 94. It is suggested that the funds are trust funds which cannot be deposited in the state treasury. See Friedman v. American Surety Co. of New York, 151 S.W.2d570(Tex. 1941);Manion v.Lockhart, 114 S.W.2d216(Tex. 1938). In our opinion, federal law does not prohibit the deposit ofthese funds ln the state treasury. The law earmarks certain funds for particular purposes but does not establish procedures for handling them. 20 U.S.C. SS107l$2), 107d-3(a). See also 45 C.F.R. S1369. The quoted rider apprcpriates the funds placed in the treasury. They are available to beused for the purposes specified by federal law, and thus the Commission is required to deposit them inthe State Treasury. SUMMARY Funds accruing to the Commission for the Blind from the operation of food vending facilities shall be

p. 376Mr.Evans N.Wentz - Page Two (lW-120)
deposited in the state treasury as required by rider to the appropriation act.

MARK WHITE Attorney General ofTexas JOHN W.FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General TEDL.HARTLEY Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared bySusan Garrison Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE

.C. Robert Heath, Chairman David B.Brooks BobGammage Susan Garrison Rick Gilpin Bruce Youngblood

P- 377
928.370 Service-type insurance policies. ( a ) Service-type insurance policies are cost-reimbursement type contracts or subcontracts in which the insurer provides claim and loss adjustment services on a cost reimbursement basis, which satisfies state and Federal insurance requirements.
( b ) Service-type insurance policies may be used with contracting officer approval, when one or more of the following conditions are present— ( 1 ) Pure risk commercial insurance is not available or, if available, cost is not considered reasonable;
( 2 ) Inherent risks in the contract are new and a part of the process of commercialization;
( 3 ) The service-type insurance is needed to implement jointly funded projects; or
( 4 ) The service-type insurance arrangement is considered in the Government's best interest.
[61 FR 41708, Aug. 9, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 36366, July 22, 2009]
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT (11)

                                CMI CORPORATION
                STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (In thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                         Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                            September 30       September 30
                                         ------------------  -----------------
                                           1997      1996      1997     1996
                                         ---------  -------  --------  -------
<S>                                      <C>        <C>      <C>       <C>
 
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
Net earnings per statements of
 earnings                                  $ 1,433    2,333     5,087    6,212
 
Deduct dividends on preferred stock        $     -      151         -      272
                                           -------   ------    ------   ------
 
Net earnings applicable to common
 stock                                     $ 1,433    2,182     5,087    5,940
                                           =======   ======    ======   ======
 
Weighted average outstanding common
 shares                                     21,328   20,468    21,140   20,413
 
Add dilutive effect of outstanding
 stock options (as determined using
 the treasury stock method)                     53      204        97      344
                                           -------   ------    ------   ------
 
Weighted average outstanding common
 shares and common share equivalents,
 as adjusted                                21,381   20,672    21,237   20,757
                                           =======   ======    ======   ======
 
Primary earnings per share                    $.07      .11       .24      .29
                                           =======   ======    ======   ======

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

Net earnings applicable to common
 stock as shown in primary
 computation above                         $ 1,433    2,182     5,087    5,940
                                           -------   ------    ------   ------
 
Weighted average common shares
 outstanding                                21,328   20,468    21,140   20,413
 
Add fully dilutive effect of
 outstanding stock options (as
 determined using the treasury stock
 method)                                        54      204       107      344
                                           -------   ------    ------   ------
 
Weighted average outstanding common
 shares and common shares equivalents,
 as adjusted                                21,382   20,672    21,247   20,757
                                           =======   ======    ======   ======
 
Fully diluted earnings per share           $   .07      .11       .24      .29
                                           =======   ======    ======   ======
 
</TABLE>
[J-33-2016] [MO: Dougherty, J.] 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Appellee 

 v. 

THOMAS MICHAEL LUTZ-MORRISON, 

 Appellant 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 28 MAP 2015 

Appeal from the Order of the Superior 

Court at No. 1659 MDA 2013 dated 

September 18, 2014 Affirming the 

Judgment of Sentence of the Court of 

Common Pleas of Lancaster County, 

Criminal Division, dated August 16, 

2013 at No. CR-36-0003611-2012. 

ARGUED: March 8, 2016 

DISSENTING OPINION 

JUSTICE WECHT DECIDED: August 15, 2016

I join in the reasoning of Justice Todd’s dissenting opinion, subject to the 

reservations that I explained in my dissenting opinion in A.S. v. Pa. State Police, 24 

MAP 2014, J-36-2016 (Pa. filed Aug. 15, 2016 ) (Wecht, J., dissenting).