alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10539 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10539

To amend section 222 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit 
the rejection of immigrant and nonimmigrant applications for omissions 
                    in certain fields not required.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2024

 Mrs. Ramirez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 222 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to prohibit 
the rejection of immigrant and nonimmigrant applications for omissions 
                    in certain fields not required.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATIONS FOR VISAS.

    Section 222 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1202) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by adding after the period at the 
        end the following: ``An application that is submitted in such 
        form and manner and at such place as prescribed by regulations 
        may not be rejected solely because it contains an omission in a 
        field of the application not required under such 
        regulations.'';
            (2) in subsection (c), by adding after the period at the 
        end the following: ``An application that is submitted in such 
        form and manner as prescribed by regulations may not be 
        rejected solely because it contains an omission in a field of 
        the application not required under such regulations.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Homeland Security shall promulgate rules and regulations to carry out 
any change to the adjudication criteria for an application or petition 
related to the immigration status of an alien under this section that 
would preclude or restrict consideration of such application or 
petition.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In re BOND.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

In the matter of the application of Charles G. Bond for admission to the bar.

No opinion. Application granted.
#### Ronald PRUDEN, Appellant v. SCHUYLKILL COUNTY PRISON MEDICAL STAFF; SCI Camp Hill Doctors & Staff; SCI Cresson, Ms. Nolan & Doctor; SCI Houtzdale, Doctor; SCI Huntingdon, Dr. Alterman, Unit Manager, SOU.

No. 07-3072.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action

Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 Oct. 12, 2007.

Filed: Nov. 6, 2007.

Ronald Pruden, Graterford, PA, pro se.

Before: MCKEE, RENDELL and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ronald Pruden, appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania dismissing his post-judgment motion for the appointment of counsel and motion to consolidate his cases as moot. For the reasons that follow, we will dismiss his appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

On January 3, 2007, Pruden filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The District Court determined that the injunctive relief Appellant sought was no longer available and dismissed the complaint as moot. Pruden appealed, and we dismissed his appeal for his failure to timely prosecute. C.A. No. 07-1319. Thereafter, Pruden filed several motions requesting counsel and consolidation of his cases. The District Court denied the motions as moot because Pruden’s case had been closed. Pruden appeals from the denial of his third motion.

We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). Because Pruden has been granted *in forma pauperis*status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, we review this appeal for possible dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). An appeal may be dismissed if it has no arguable basis in law or fact. *Neitzke v. Williams,*490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).

We conclude that the District Court properly denied Pruden’s motion for counsel and motion to consolidate as moot. Because Pruden’s complaint had been dismissed and the action closed, the District Court had no alternative except to deny the motions.

For the foregoing reasons, we will dismiss this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Pruden’s motion for counsel is denied.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of YaSheng Group (the “Company”) on Form 10- K/A for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:   September 6 , 2012By:  /s/ Zhou Chang ShengZhou Chang ShengChief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           The National High School Center      

# The National High School Center

The National High School Center serves as the central source of information and expertise on high school improvement for the Regional Comprehensive Centers (RCCs).

http://www.betterhighschools.org/
May 22, 2015 

Mr. Carl Johnson 

New Picture Studios 

21257 State Highway EE 

Callao, MO 63534 

Dear Mr. Carl Johnson: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your March 25, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-0760), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


I, Scoville Walker, chief Executive Officer of Bellows
Acquisition Corporation, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the attached report on Form 10-K.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
     untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
     fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
     financial information included in this report, fairly present
     in all material respects the financial condition, results of
     operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
     the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
     controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules)
     for the registrant and have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
     those entities, particularly during the period in which this
     report is being prepared;

b)   designed such internal control over financial reporting to
     provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
     financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
     for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
     accounting principles;

c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report my
     conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
     controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
     by this report based on such evaluations; and

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
     internal control over financial reporting that occurred
     during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
     registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
     likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
     registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
     board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
     internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
     ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
     and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
     weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
     internal controls.

      Date: April 10, 2009             /s/ Scoville Walker
                                          Chief executive officer

<PAGE>
#### § 1207.302 Act.

*Act* means the Potato Research and Promotion Act, *Title III of Public Law 91-670, 91st Congress, approved January 11, 1971, 84 Stat. 2041,* as amended.

[56 FR 40229, Aug. 14, 1991]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JORDAN MICHAEL WALLICK,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 481 MAL 2020 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of January, 2021, the Motion to Quash Petition for 

Allocatur/Petition for Allocatur Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. The Petition for Allowance 

of Appeal is DISMISSED, without prejudice.
#### § 1000.3 Route disposition.

*Route disposition* means a delivery to a retail or wholesale outlet (except a plant), either directly or through any distribution facility (including disposition from a plant store, vendor, or vending machine) of a fluid milk product in consumer-type packages or dispenser units classified as Class I milk.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42765

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MICHAEL ALLEN PASBORG,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 611

Filed: September 2, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Melissa Moody, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years with two years 

determinate for eluding a peace officer and driving without privileges, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Michael Allen Pasborg was found guilty of eluding a peace officer, Idaho Code § 49-

1404(2) and driving without privileges, I.C. § 18-8001. The district court sentenced Pasborg to a 

unified term of five years with two years determinate to run consecutively to a previous sentence.

Pasborg appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive 

sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Pasborg’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Understanding Children on the Autism Spectrum: A Guide for First Responders      

# Resource: Understanding Children on the Autism Spectrum: A Guide for First Responders

This resource (PDF, 4 pages) provides recommendations for how law enforcement can best support children on the autism spectrum who have gone missing. The resource shares a definition of autism, describes characteristics and behaviors of children on the autism spectrum, and outlines components of a whole community approach to finding missing children on the autism spectrum. Appropriate search protocols are also discussed. Additional resources are provided. **Learn more** (PDF, 4 pages).
#### Mignon Compart, by Florence Compart, her mother and next friend, plaintiff-appellee, v. F. E. Tarrant, defendant-appellant.

Gen. No. 33,308.

Opinion filed November 6, 1929.

Francis F. Moran, for appellant; Thomas J. Young, of counsel. Rubenstein & Rubenstein, for appellee; Clyde C. Fisher, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Ryner

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                               ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THTE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of AmBase  Corporation (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2007 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P.
Ferrara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 13, 2007
                                               /s/ John P. Ferrara
                                               -----------------------------
                                               John P. Ferrara
                                               Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               AmBase Corporation
10/18/2010

All:

Attached please find a Powerpoint presentation which will be used to overview the Utility

MACT regulatory effort at our Federalism discussion next week. If you have any 

questions/concerns, please feel free to contact us. I look forward to seeing each of you next 

week in Washington, D.C.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D.

Leader, Energy Strategies Group

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Mail Code D243-01

RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045

Cell: (919) 306-2290

Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

*********************************************************

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

*********************************************************
The above e-mail was sent to the following addressees: 

Tamra.Spielvogel@ncsl.org, 

Max.Behlke@ncsl.org, 

mnellenbach@nga.org, 

bstrobridge@nga.org, 

sbrown@ecos.org, 

jsheahan@usmayors.org, 

randerson@usmayors.org, 

brosenberg@usmayors.org

berndt@nlc.org, 

wollack@nlc.org, 

byuhas@icma.org, 

cfleming@icma.org, 

jimo@tfgnet.com, 

sstockdale@tfgnet.com

netheredge@csg.org, 

dmyers@csg.org

jufner@naco.org, 

kbrubach@countyexecutives.org, 

mgriffin@countyexecutives.org,

mdouglas@4cleanair.org
<Page>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                      THE CIT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                ($ IN MILLIONS)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                         JANUARY 1         JUNE 2            FOR THE SIX
                                                          THROUGH         THROUGH            MONTHS ENDED
                                                       JUNE 1, 2001    JUNE 30, 2001        JUNE 30, 2000
                                                       -------------   --------------       --------------
                                                       (PREDECESSOR)    (SUCCESSOR)         (PREDECESSOR)
<S>                                                    <C>             <C>                  <C>
Net income...........................................     $   81.3         $ 71.2              $  295.3
Provision for income taxes...........................         82.0           53.2                 181.5
                                                          --------         ------              --------
Earnings before provision for income taxes...........        163.3          124.4                 476.8
                                                          --------         ------              --------

Fixed charges:
  Interest and debt expense on indebtedness..........      1,022.7          161.8               1,202.8
  Minority interest in subsidiary trust holding
    solely
    debentures of the Company........................          8.0            1.6                   9.6
  Interest factor--one third of rentals on real and
    personal properties..............................          7.5            1.5                  11.1
                                                          --------         ------              --------
Total fixed charges..................................      1,038.2          164.9               1,223.5
                                                          --------         ------              --------

Total earnings before provision for income taxes
  and fixed charges..................................     $1,201.5         $289.3              $1,700.3
                                                          ========         ======              ========
Ratios of earnings to fixed charges..................        1.16x          1.75x                 1.39x

Ratios of earnings to fixed charges excluding
  goodwill
  amortization and non-recurring charges.............        1.41x          1.84x                 1.42x
</Table>