alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
852.102 Incorporating provisions and clauses. ( a ) As authorized by FAR 52.102(c), any 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR) provision or clause may be incorporated in a quotation, solicitation, or contract by reference, provided the contracting officer complies with the requirements stated in FAR 52.102(c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3). To ensure compliance with FAR 52.102(c)(1) and (c)(2), contracting officers shall insert the provision found at 852.252-70, Solicitation provisions or clauses incorporated by reference, in full text in a quotation, solicitation, or contract if the quotation, solicitation, or contract incorporates by reference a FAR or 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR) provision or clause that requires completion by the offeror or prospective contractor and submittal with the quotation or offer.
( b ) For any FAR or 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR) provision or clause that requires completion by the contracting officer, the contracting officer shall, as a minimum, insert the title of the provision or clause and the paragraph that requires completion in full text in the quotation, solicitation, or contract. The balance of the provision or clause may be incorporated by reference.
( c ) When one or more FAR or 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR) provisions, or portions thereof, are incorporated in a quotation or solicitation by reference, the contracting officer shall insert in the quotation or solicitation the provision found at FAR 52.252-1, Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference.
( d ) When one or more FAR or 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR) clauses, or portions thereof, are incorporated in a quotation, solicitation, or contract by reference, the contracting officer shall insert in the quotation, solicitation, or contract the clause found at FAR 52.252-2, Clauses Incorporated by Reference.
( e ) If one or more FAR provisions or clauses, or portions thereof, are incorporated in a quotation, solicitation, or contract by reference, the contracting officer shall insert in the FAR provision or clause required by paragraph (c) or (d) of this section the following internet address: *https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far .*
( f ) If one or more 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR) provisions or clauses, or portions thereof, are incorporated in a quotation, solicitation, or contract by reference, the contracting officer shall insert in the FAR provision or clause required by paragraph (c) or (d) of this section the following internet address: *https://www.acquisition.gov/vaar .*
[73 FR 2717, Jan. 15, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 54403, Oct. 1, 2021]
Exhibit 13

                               906 Certification


     The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report")
for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

     Jason C.S. Chang, the Chief Executive Officer, and Joseph Tung, the Chief
Financial Officer, of Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc., each certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc.




Date: June 30, 2004                    /s/ Jason C.S. Chang
-------------------                    ----------------------------------------
                                       Name:    Jason C.S. Chang
                                       Title:   Chief Executive Officer




                                       /s/ Joseph Tung
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Name:    Joseph Tung
                                       Title:   Chief Financial Officer
#### INDUSTRIAL & GENERAL TRUST, Limited, v. TOD et al. (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 16, 1906.)

Actions by the Industrial & General Trust, Limited, against J. Kennedy Tod and another.

No opinion. Motion denied, on payment of $10 costs. Order filed.
(May 13, 2004)

#### In the Matter of John Creegan, Appellant, v Board of Trustees of the New York City Police Pension Fund Article II et al., Respondents.

[775 NYS2d 867]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Roslyn Richter, J.), entered June 11, 2003, which denied and dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent’s denial of petitioner’s application for accident disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Inasmuch as there was abundant credible evidence to support the Medical Board’s determination that petitioner was not disabled from performing his duties as a police officer, there is no ground for judicially disturbing its determination denying petitioner accident disability retirement benefits *(see Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys.,*88 NY2d 756, 760-761 [1996]). The record amply discloses that the Medical Board’s determination was based on, and indeed rationally supported by, its review of numerous diagnostic tests which petitioner submitted, including echocardiograms and stress tests, and its interview and physical examination of him. It does not avail petitioner in the context of this proceeding that there was some minimal conflicting evidence before the board from which a different interpretation was urged because “we must defer to the expertise of the Medical Board in resolving such conflict[s] . . .” *(Mulheren v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund,*307 AD2d 129, 131 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 515 [2003]; *see also Matter of Borenstein, supra*at 761). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") of American IDC Corp., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), I, Gordon F. Lee, President and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: April 23, 2003             /s/ Gordon F. Lee
                                  ------------------
                                  Gordon F. Lee
                                  President and Principal Financial Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Protecting Children in Cyberspace: The ICAC Task Force Program      

# Protecting Children in Cyberspace: The ICAC Task Force Program

The ICAC Program can help State and local law enforcement agencies to develop an effective response to online enticement and child pornography cases.

https://ojjdp.ojp.gov/programs/internet-crimes-against-children-task-force-program
Exhibit 23.6

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

We hereby consent to the reference to DeGolyer and MacNaughton, to the
incorporation of the information contained in our Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2005 on Certain Properties owned by ATP Oil & Gas Corporation (our Report), and to references to our Report in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
ATP Oil & Gas Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005 In addition, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of such reference to DeGolyer and MacNaughton and to our Report in ATP Oil & Gas Corporations previously
filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-105699 and 333-121662) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-60762).

Very truly yours,

|                           
|---------------------------
|                           
|                           
|/s/ DeGolyer and McNaughton
|DeGolyer and MacNaughton   

March 14, 2006
#### WILSON, Respondent, v. SIMMONS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 5, 1906.)

Action by Bert 0. Wilson against George J. Simmons.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
951.103 Ordering from Government supply sources. ( b ) The Senior Procurement Executive shall be informed of instances in which GSA sources of supply are not used because of the quality of the items available from GSA or when a Federal Supply Schedule contractor refuses to honor an order.
[49 FR 12042, Mar. 28, 1984, as amended at 74 FR 36378, July 22, 2009]
§ 1000.2 General definitions. ( a ) *Act* means Public Act No. 10, 73d Congress, as amended and as reenacted and amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*).
( b ) Order or Federal milk order means the applicable part of 7 CFR, chapter X, issued pursuant to Section 8c of the Act as a Federal milk marketing order (as amended).
( c ) *Department* means the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
( d ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act in his stead.
( e ) *Person* means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other business unit.
#### In the Matter of Howard Roseman, an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

May 22, 1979

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Nicholas C. Cooper*for petitioner.

*Lewis R. Friedman*of counsel *(Litman,*Friedman, *Kaufman & Asche,*attorneys), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Department on April 2, 1951.

*55On January 10, 1979, respondent was convicted in the Supreme Court, New York County, after a jury trial, of four counts of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law, § 215.51), which is a class E felony, and was sentenced to a term of one year in prison.

He concedes that, pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, he cannot practice law in this State. However, he contends that because incarceration was stayed pending an appeal, the entry of the order striking the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, should also be stayed pending the appeal.

The petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department seeks to have respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys. The petition should be granted. *(Matter of Donegan,*282 NY 285; *Matter of Ginsberg,*1 NY2d 144; *Matter of Mitchell,*40 NY2d 153.)

Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Lane, Markewich and Ross, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York.
Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 a n d Congressiona l Revie w Requirement s Rulemakin g Documen t

Title : ) ^^"\<rvJwlfK - rr \--^/)t/(iJ( A K ( VO^^T" ^
Wit hrespec t t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) : 1 . E.0.12866 : Th e requirement s o f sectio n 6(aX3)(E ) o f

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee n met i n accordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

^_^_ ^ Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio n an d Regulator y Affair s (OIRA) . _^^^

_N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(s ) after i t wa s submitte dt o OIRA . Th e require dinformatio n i s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review : Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t for th e submissio n o f

final rule s t o Congres s an dGA O (§801 ) hav e bee n met in accordanc e wit

hth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

______Thi s documen t

i s no t afina l rule . Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) . Th e documen t

ha s bee n submitte dt o C-5 0 for transmissio n t o Congres s an dGAO . ( Signatur e ' ( ^ Nam e Tille/Office Dat e
##### 



CNA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
of CNA Financial Corporation
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006
filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ D. Craig MenseD. Craig Mense
Chief Financial Officer
  102
##### 



Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer
of CNA Financial Corporation
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 filed
on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ D. Craig MenseD. Craig Mense
Chief Financial Officer
#### 911.600 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements and supplements 48 CFR part subpart 11.6, Priorities and Allocations, and implements the regulations and procedures of the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) in solicitations and contracts in support of authorized national defense programs. (See 15 CFR part 700).

[52 FR 38422, Oct. 16, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 9105, Feb. 25, 1994. Redesignated and amended at 61 FR 21976, May 13, 1996; 61 FR 30823, June 18, 1996; 73 FR 10985, Feb. 29, 2008; 76 FR 7692, Feb. 11, 2011]
**EXHIBIT10.7****LEASE AGREEMENTADDENDUM**LESSOR: ParrishReality, Inc. a property management company LESSES: Global FoodTechnologies, Inc., represented by Mark Terry, an authorized agent thereofThis document serves asan addendum as provided under the terms of Section 38 as written notices ofchange **"This agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties andmerges any prior oral agreements between the parties concerning the same subjectmatter. This document shall not be modified except in writing as mutually agreedby both parties."**Effective April 1,2002, the following Lease Agreement changes have been agreed upon by bothparties, and authorized by the signatures below:  1. Page 1, Paragraph 3, Subsection A, shall nowread: a. A Research and Development company, with the rental space on the main      floor only consisting of approximately 40,000 sq. ft. of the Parrish Park      Processing Facility, at 1656 Kraft Road located in Pocatello, Idaho and      compromising parking facility and area surrounding the facility and      associated therewith, as outlined on attachedExhibit A. 2. Paragraph 2, shall now read: a. LESSEES: Global Food Technologies, Inc., represented by Mark Terry, an      authorized agent thereof   This addendum is binding and limited to the parties  hereto.        /s/ Mark Terry    4/22/02         Mark Terry - Chief Technical      Officer/Chief Operations Manager, Global Food Technologies, Inc.,      authorized agent for Global Food Technologies, LESSEE        /s/ Fred J. Parrish    4/24/02         Fred J. Parrish, authorized agent for      Parrish Reality, Inc.LESSOR
#### 154 East Park Avenue Corp. et al., Appellants, v City of Long Beach et al., Respondents.

— In an action (1) to permanently enjoin defendants from preventing plaintiffs from reconstructing certain premises and (2) for money damages, plaintiffs appeal from so much of (1) a purported order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 23, 1978 (which, in fact, is a decision) and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered thereon on June 30, 1978, insofar as they denied his claim against defendants for money damages. Appeal from the decision dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from a decision. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements (see *Rottkamp v Young,*21 AD2d 373, affd 15 NY2d 831). Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.92

On September 2, 2004, the Compensation Committee of Andrx's Board of Directors
approved the following resolution regarding Thomas P. Rice's compensation:

      RESOLVED, that notwithstanding the ninety day and $25 per diem limitations
set forth in the standard provisions of the Andrx Relocation Policy, which
Thomas Rice ("Executive") is entitled to receive pursuant to his Employment
Agreement, Executive shall be entitled to receive (i) temporary living expenses
(including a Company paid apartment at a cost of approximately $5,000 each month
and weekly travel to and from his Maryland home) until the earlier of March 30,
2005 or the date his family relocates to South Florida (the "Relocation
Period"), (ii) a per diem payment of $50 during the Relocation Period, and (iii)
a gross-up of Executive's compensation for any state or federal income taxes
that Executive may me required to pay as a result of the relocation payments
made to him during the Relocation Period; and it is further

      RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company are authorized and empowered to
execute such other agreements with each such persons as they, in their judgment,
deem necessary or desirable to effectuate the intent of this and the foregoing
resolutions.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Special Feature: Teen Dating Violence      

# Special Feature: Teen Dating Violence

This webpage provides publications and resources that aim to increase awareness of the dangers of teen dating violence.

https://www.ncjrs.gov/teendatingviolence/
9904.406-30 Definitions. ( a ) The following are definitions of terms which are prominent in this Standard. Other terms defined elsewhere in this part 99 shall have the meanings ascribed to them in those definitions unless paragraph (b) of this subsection, requires otherwise. ( 1 ) *Allocate* means to assign an item of cost, or a group of items of cost, to one or more cost objectives. This term includes both direct assignment of cost and the reassignment of a share from an indirect cost pool.
( 2 ) *Cost objective* means a function, organizational subdivision, contract, or other work unit for which cost data are desired and for which provision is made to accumulate and measure the cost of processes, products, jobs, capitalized projects, etc.
( 3 ) *Fiscal year* means the accounting period for which annual financial statements are regularly prepared, generally a period of 12 months, 52 weeks, or 53 weeks.
( 4 ) *Indirect cost pool* means a grouping of incurred costs identified with two or more cost objectives but not identified specifically with any final cost objective.
( b ) The following modification of terms defined elsewhere in this chapter 99 are applicable to this Standard: None.