alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T OCTOB ER 27, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
N o

. 0 8

- 1 4 0 9 3 N o n
- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 7

- 0 0 2 6 6

- C R

- K D

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

M O N T R E Z S D E J U A N L E W I S ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f A l a b a m a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( O c t o b e r 2 7 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e B L A C K , P R Y O R a n d H I L L , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.

P E R C U R I A M :

R a y m o n d A

. P i e r s o n , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r M o n t r e z s D e

j u a n L e w i s , h a sf

i l e d a m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w o n a p p e a l , s u p p o r t e d b y a b r i e f p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o

A n d e r s v

. C a l i f

o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r

i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e

r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e

e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o i s s u e s o f a r g u a b l e m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s

G R A N T E D , a n d L e w i s ’ s c o n v i c t i o n s a n d s e n t e n c e s a r e A F F I R M E D

. L e w i s ’ s

m o t i o n s t o p r o c e e d p r o s e , t o t e r m i n a t e c o u n s e l , a n d f o r a n e x t e n s i o n o f t i m e t o f i l e

a s u p p l e m e n t a l b r i e f a r e D E N I E D A S M O O T

.

2
•M-/3

ELECTRONIC RECORD

CCA # 14-12-00745-CR OFFENSE Manslaughter

STYLE: Isaac Cardale Lensey v.The State ofTexas COUNTY Harris

TRIAL COURT:

TRIAL COURT #:

338th District Court

1311361

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Judge, 338th Distrirt Court

FOR REHEARING IS:

DATE:

MOTION

DISPOSITION:

DATE:

JUSTICE: _

PUBLISH:

Wsntdi

pc/'s

3fa

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APP BR:

DNP:

SUPP CLK RECORD

SUPP RPT RECORD fAJft

PRO SE BR

Mb

m.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

•fl<H3

ELECTRONIC RECORD

State. S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

date: 's4t>ril 16. 20/V

JUDGE: P<Q*

. MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

CCA IS:. ON

JUDGE:

CCA#

Disposition:.

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

ON

JUDGE:
****

** **

**Exhibit12.1**

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

I, Lars-JohanJarnheimer, certify that:

1.                  Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Tele2 AB;

2.                  Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.                  Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.                  Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and we have:

a)                Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosedin this report any changes in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                  Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)               Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: June 14, 2006 |                           |                      |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                     | By:                            | /s/ Lars-Johan Jarnheimer |
|                     | Name: Lars-Johan Jarnheimer    |
|                     | Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
January 10, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JAMES B. MADDUX AND GMS ENERGY SERVICES, L.P. AND STAR TAX 

SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., Appellant

NO. 14-04-01035-CV V.

TRINITY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, LTD. AND TPC INVESTMENTS, INC., 

Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on June 30, 2004. Having considered the motion and found it 

meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by JAMES 

B. MADDUX AND GMS ENERGY SERVICES, L.P. AND STAR TAX SOLUTIONS, 

L.L.C..

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
##### 



CERTIFICATION EXHIBITS Exhibit 31-1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, John W. Rowe, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Exelon
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):(a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: July 28, 2004
    
    /s/ John W. RoweChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
P e r m i t R e f e r e n c e E m i s s i o n U n i t D e s c r i p t i o n L a t i t u d e L o n g i t u d e E U - P 2 # 2 C u p o l a         ! " #   $    ! E U - P 2 A # 2 C u p o l a T h e r m a l O x i d i z e r      # # $! " #   $ % &  ! E U - P 4 # 4 C u p o l a      # ! " #   $ & % #! E U - P 4 A # 4 C u p o l a T h e r m a l O x i d i z e r      #  ! " #   $ %   ! E U - P 6 # 4 B l o wc h a m b e r      #  ! " #   $ %  ! E U - P 7 # 2 L i n e C u r i n g O v e n       $   ! " #      

! E U - P 8 # 2 B l o wc h a m b e r         ! " #   $ & #  ! E U - P 9 # 2 L i n e S i z i n g       %   ! " #      

! E U - P 1 0 # 2 L i n e C o o l i n g S e c t i o n       % $ $! " #    $!                          

P e r m i t R e f e r e n c e D i s c h a r g e P o i n t L a t i t u d e L o n g i t u d e S 1 / S 3 # 2 /

# 4 C u p o l a B a g H o u s e         ! "         ! S 4 # 4 B l o w C h a m b e r M e c h a n i c a l F i l t e r       # ! "    $ $ %  ! S 5 # 2 C u r i n g O v

e n R TO         ! "      

! S 6 # 2 B l o w C h a m b e r M e c h a n i c a l F i l t e r         ! "       $! S 7 # 2 T r i m i n g / S i z i n g B a g H o u s e       % $ ! "    $   $! S 8 # 2 C o o l i n g S e c t i o n S t a c k       #   ! "      

! S 9 # 1 B o i l e r         ! "    $ #  ! D C - 3 0 B a g H o u s e f o r F i b e r B o n d C u tt i n g

O p e r a t i o n         ! "    % # #  !
#### § 1124.70 Producer-settlement fund.

See § 1000.70.
#### § 1.420 Consent recommendation.

Any time before the Judge files the decision, the parties of record may enter a consent recommendation. Such consent recommendation shall be filed with the Hearing Clerk, signed by the parties with appropriate space for signature by the Judge. The consent recommendation shall contain an admission of the jurisdictional facts, the factual and legal basis for the recommended sourcing area, the consent to the issuance of the recommended decision as the final decision of the agency without further procedure and such other admissions or statements as may be recommended by the parties. The Judge shall review the recommendation to determine whether such recommendation conforms with the Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 620, *et seq.*), 36 CFR 223.190, 36 CFR 223.191(e) and these procedures. If the recommendation conforms to the aforementioned Act, regulations, and procedures, the Judge may enter such decision without further procedure, unless an error is apparent on the face of the document. If the Judge enters the decision, such decision shall have the same force and effect as a decision issued after full hearing and shall become final upon issuance to become effective in accordance with the terms of the decision.
#### § 1131.3 Route disposition.

See § 1000.3.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Page 12 of 20


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(e)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-B

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Banker's Trust Company, Deutsche Bank      Key Bank USA, National Association
100 Plaza One, Mailstop: JCY03-6450        800 Superior Avenue, 4th Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07310                      Cleveland, Ohio 44114
ATTN: Corporate Trust & Agency Group       ATTN: Senior Vice President
        Structured Finance                 Key Education Resources
Phone: (201) 593-6776                      Phone: (216) 828-9342
Fax: (201) 593-6459                        Fax: (216) 828-9301

MBIA  Insurance Corporation
113 King Street
Armonk, NY 10504
ATTN: Data Administration
Phone: (914) 765-3772
Fax:     (914) 765-3810


Pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Indenture between KeyCorp Student Loan Trust
2000-B, as Issuer, and Bankers Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee, dated
September 1, 2000, the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the
activities of the Issuer from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2001, and of
its performance under the Indenture has been made, and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Indenture throughout such period.


                                           KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-B,
                                           as Issuer
                                           By:   Bank One, National Association
                                                 as Eligible Lender Trustee


                                           By:    /S/ JEFFREY L. KINNEY
                                              ----------------------------------
Date:  March 8, 2002                       Name:  Jeffrey L. Kinney
                                           Title: Vice President
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citicorp (the "Company")
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert B. Willumstad, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Todd S. Thomson, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert B. Willumstad
--------------------------------------------
Robert B. Willumstad
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003


/s/ Todd S. Thomson
--------------------------------------------
Todd S. Thomson
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003


This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In re Application of George Bartlett for Discharge from Imprisonment.

Gen. No. 8,485.

*260Opinion filed February 26, 1931.

Johnson & Pefferle, for appellant.

Scott *&*Scott and George C. Hoffman, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Niehaus

delivered the opinion of the court.

In this case the appellee, George Bartlett, a debtor, was arrested and imprisoned in the county jail charged with unjustly refusing to surrender his property for satisfaction of an execution issued against him upon a judgment recovered against him by St. John’s Hospital for the sum of $294.15. Thereupon in conformity with the provisions of Cahill’s St. ch. 72, if 8; sec. 5, ch. 72, Smith-Hurd Illinois Revised Statutes 1929, a trial by jury was had in the county court of Sangamon county upon the question of whether or not the debtor had refused to surrender his property to satisfy the execution referred to; and the jury returned a verdict of not guilty. The judgment appealed from was rendered upon the verdict.

The only question raised upon appeal for reversal of the judgment is, that the verdict is manifestly against the weight of the evidence. Three witnesses, including the appellee, testified that the constable, who it is alleged had the execution, came to the dwelling house of the appellee and entered the house without knocking; and after he had entered, did not disclose the fact that he came there as constable, and had an execution, and was about to make a levy under it. These were vital matters in the proof to sustain the charge against appellee. It is true that Frank Johnson, the constable, and Guy Lee, another constable, who went with Johnson to appellee’s house, flatly contradict the testimony of the appellee and the *261other two witnesses who testified in his behalf concerning the matters referred to. These witnesses testified that Johnson knocked on the door and was invited into the house; and informed the appellee that he was a constable; and that he had an execution; and wanted to levy it. The jury in this case, as in any other, are the judges of the credibility of the witnesses who testify. It is clear that they believed the appellee and his witnesses; and did not believe the witnesses who testified to sustain the charge against appellee. This court would not be warranted in saying that the jury should not have given credence to the testimony of the appellee and his witnesses; but should have believed the witnesses called to sustain the charge against him. And under these circumstances the court would not be justified in holding that the verdict is manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### 970.0407-1 Applicability.
**EXHIBIT
15**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 May 3,
2005
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Securities and
Exchange Commission
 450 Fifth Street,
N.W.
 Washington, D.C.
20549
 
 Commissioners:
 
 We are aware that
our report dated May 3, 2005 on our review of consolidated interim
financial information of FirstEnergy Corp. (the "Company") as of March 31,
2005 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, included in
the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005, is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-3
(Nos. 333-48587, 333-102074 and 333-103865) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-48651,
333-56094, 333-58279, 333-67798, 333-72764, 333-72766, 333-72768, 333-75985,
333-81183, 333-89356, 333-101472 and 333-110662).
 
 Very truly
yours,
 
 
 
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 
 
 134
 
 **EXHIBIT
15**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 May 3,
2005
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Securities and
Exchange Commission
 450 Fifth Street,
N.W.
 Washington, D.C.
20549
 
 Commissioners:
 
 We are aware that
our report dated May 3, 2005 on our review of consolidated interim
financial information of Ohio Edison Company (the “Company”) as
of March 31, 2005 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004, included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005, is incorporated by reference in its Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-49413, 33-51139, 333-01489 and
333-05277).
 
 Very truly
yours,
 
 
 
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 
 
 
 135
 
 **EXHIBIT
15**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 May 3,
2005
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Securities and
Exchange Commission
 450 Fifth Street,
N.W.
 Washington, D.C.
20549
 
 Commissioners:
 
 We are aware that
our report dated May 3, 2005 on our review of consolidated interim
financial information of Pennsylvania Power Company (the “Company”) as
of March 31, 2005 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004, included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005, is incorporated by reference in its Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-62450 and 33-65156).
 
 Very truly
yours,
 
 
 
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 
 
 
 136
 
 **EXHIBIT
15**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 May 3,
2005
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Securities and
Exchange Commission
 450 Fifth Street,
N.W.
 Washington, D.C.
20549
 
 Commissioners:
 
 We are aware that
our report dated May 3, 2005 on our review of consolidated interim
financial information of Pennsylvania Electric Company (the “Company”) as
of March 31, 2005 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004, included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005, is incorporated by reference in its Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-62295, 333-62295-01 and
333-62295-02).
 
 Very truly
yours,
 
 
 
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 
 
 
 137
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 134362 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 134362 COA: 269788 Wayne CC: 05-012650-01 KENYA DESHEL HORNE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
732.402 General. ( a ) - ( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) ( 1 ) U.S. Dollar advances to for-profit organizations for any award, including advances for disbursement to grantees, must be processed and approved in accordance with ADS Chapter 636.
( 2 ) All local currency advances to for-profit organizations for any award require the approval of the head of the contracting activity, with concurrence of the Mission Controller.
[79 FR 74995, Dec. 16, 2014]