alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Companys annual
report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                     |  |  |  |                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Date: March 12, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ BRYCE CHICOYNE            
|                     |  |  |  | Name: Bryce Chicoyne          
|                     |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
FIRST
      VALLEY BANCORP, INC. FORM 10-QSB QUARTERLY REPORT


MARCH
      31,
      2007














CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First Valley Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J.
      Blum, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                Mark J. BlumMark
                J. BlumExecutive
                Vice President, Treasurerand
                CFO














The
      foregoing is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
      is
      not being filed as part of this Report or as a separate disclosure document.
970.1504-1-8 Special equipment purchases. ( a ) Special equipment is sometimes procured in conjunction with management and operating contracts. When a contractor procures special equipment, the DOE negotiating official shall determine separate fees for the equipment which shall not exceed the maximum fee allowable as established using the schedule in 915.404-4-71-5(h).
( b ) In determining appropriate fees, factors such as complexity of equipment, ratio of procurement transactions to volume of equipment to be purchased and completeness of services should be considered. Where possible, the reasonableness of the fees should be checked by their relationship to actual costs of comparable procurement services.
( c ) For purposes of this subsection, special equipment is equipment for which the purchase price is of such a magnitude compared to the cost of installation as to distort the amount of technical direction and management effort required of the contractor. Special equipment is of a nature that requires less management attention. When a contractor procures special equipment, the DOE negotiating official shall determine separate fees for the equipment using the schedule in 915.404-4-71-5(h). The determination of specific items of equipment in this category requires application of judgment and careful study of the circumstances involved in each project. This category of equipment would generally include: ( 1 ) Major items of prefabricated process or research equipment; and
( 2 ) Major items of preassembled equipment such as packaged boilers, generators, machine tools, and large electrical equipment. In some cases, it would also include special apparatus or devices such as reactor vessels and reactor charging machines.
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36371, July 22, 2009]
I ) - c ')' 11 C ,_, I 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Clerk ,L 0 tri( .:. I Jnkruptcy 

Court: Jrl8 )ls1.l( t c.d Columbia 

Ilina Valkova, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Petar M. Valkov, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs pro se complaint and application to 

proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the plaintiffs application and dismiss the 

complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) (requiring the court 

to dismiss an action "at any time" it determines that subject matter jurisdiction is wanting). 

The subject matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth 

generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available 

only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the 

amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least 

plead facts that bring the suit within the court's jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). 

The plaintiff, a resident of Wahpeton, North Dakota, sues a resident of Fargo, North 

Dakota, over child custody matters. The complaint neither presents a federal question nor 

provides a basis for diversity jurisdiction because the parties reside in the same state and no 

amount in controversy is pled. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum 

Opinion. 

DATE: .t,LL, 1,2011 

I 

3
##### 



Exhibit 31-6
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
 AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PECO Energy Company;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: October 26, 2005
    /s/ John L. SkoldsPresident, Exelon Energy Delivery(Principal Executive Officer)
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3518

_____________________________

WILLIE V. CRUZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Judge.

July 11, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Willie V. Cruz, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
4500445684 10/07

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA INVcENO.

STD—521 REV. 12-88

PUBLICATIONSAUTHORIZATION AND INVOICE

PUBLICATIONS AUTHORIZATION (To be completed by agency) (1

TO/ (NAME AND ADDRESS OF NEWSPAPERI FEDERAL ID. NO/SOC. SEC. NO. FROM (NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENCY) AGENCYTELEHONE NO,

Pittsburgh Post Gazette 94—0692700 Yvette N. House 717—787—9495Attn: Legal Department Bureau of Air QualftEy

34 Boulevard of the Allies 400 Market Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15222 12th Floor

.________________________________________________ TTprr’hurpr PA 17105

HEREWITH IS ENCLOSED COPY FOR PUSUCAT1ON OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR PROPOSALS TO TYPE OF A

EMPLOY PURCHASE CONTRACT SELL CLASSIFIED LEGAL NOT/CE

PUBUSH ADVERTISEMENT (NO. OF TIMES) MAXIMUM NO. OF LINES

1

DATES OF INSER11ON #8449655

October 14, 2009, Wednesday editi.

You, as vendor, are authorized to publish this advertisement in your newspaper, subject to the terms of this order, as

follows: Advertisement to be published in regular advertising columns, no position specified; caption of two lines arid signatureto be in capitals and subject matter and title of officer.to be set solid in type regularly used by your newspaper for public (gat)

notice advertising; charge to be made at the rate charged to and paid by commercial advertisers for matter similarly set and

occupying similar space; advertisement to be run in the editions specified above. Vendor agrees that, in the performance of any

contract awarded to it hereunder, said vendor will not discriminate against any employe or other persons on account of race, color,sex, religious creed, ancestry, age or national origin and that the Commonwealth, upon receipt of satisfactory evidence of suchdiscrimination, shall have the right to cancel said contract. Return this copy at once if you will not accept this advertisement underthe terms

set forth.

Proof of advertising in the form of a tearsheet must be included on Parts 1,2 & 3. Return original and two copies (signed

by the editor or publisher) to Agency listed above. Part I must be notarized. Part 4 is yours.

Commonwealth to be billed only for actual number of printed lines published.

ACCOUNT

FUND DEPT APP YEAR LDG ORG COST FUNCTION OR) AMOUNT

CODE 5p p7O9tQO ]7€2 711(L C I7/7ot’ /_

INVOICE (To be completed by publisher):

. DATE OF INSERTION ACTUAL NO. OF PRINTED UNES COST PER LINE TOTAL AMOUNT

p., - 1st Ad October 14, 2009 258 7.50 1,935.00

2nd Ad

3rdAd

.

GRANDTOTAL—- 1,93500

PASTE . EARSHEET HERE

Commonwè,ajth of Pennsylvania

County of A11hiW

Before me, the subscriber, a Notary Public in and for said County, personally came J. Boot

who being duly sworn, doth depose and say that he.is* agent

___________________________________________

154636
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0480

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID JOEL EATON, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 14, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 7 2022

10/07/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0480
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Families and Caregivers as Partners in School Emergency Management      

# Resource: Families and Caregivers as Partners in School Emergency Management

This fact sheet (PDF, 6 pages) provides strategies that K-12 school district administrators, teachers, and staff can use to help form partnerships and communicate with families and guardians and include them in efforts to develop, enhance, and maintain high-quality school emergency operation plans (EOPs). **Learn more**(PDF, 6 pages).
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Juvenile Court Statistics 2009      

# Juvenile Court Statistics 2009

The National Center for Juvenile Justice published this report, which profiles more than 1.5 million delinquency cases and more than 140,000 status offense cases processed by courts with juvenile jurisdiction in 2009 and tracks trends in delinquency and petitioned status offense cases over several decades.

http://www.ojjdp.gov/enews/12juvjust/120807.html
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gerald V. Cavera, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, rendered September 10, 1976, convicting defendant of three counts of criminal contempt in the first degree (Penal Law, § 215.51) and sentencing him with respect to Counts Nos. 1 and 2 to two concurrent terms of 60 days’ imprisonment followed by 4 years’ and 10 months’ probation, and with respect to Count No. 3 sentencing him to a conditional discharge, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Examination of the Grand Jury minutes received in evidence at defendant’s trial discloses sufficient testimony by defendant to establish that the conversations on the tapes read to defendant had in fact occurred; and that defendant’s repeated statements that he did not remember related to the kind of facts which are sufficiently significant so that the defendant’s statement that he did not remember amounted to a refusal to answer *(People v Ianniello,*21 NY2d 418). Concur—Birns, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan and Silver-man, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1099 

To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, to 

modify requirements under that Act relating to exemptions, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2023 

Mr. PFLUGER (for himself and Mr. CROW) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, 

as amended, to modify requirements under that Act relating to exemptions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Adversary 

5 Influence, Disinformation, and Obscured Foreign Financ6 ing Act of 2023’’ or the ‘‘PAID OFF Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1099 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF EXEMPTIONS UNDER FARA. 

2 (a) DEFINITION.—Section 1 of the Foreign Agents 

3 Registration Act of 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 611) 

4 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(q) The term ‘country of concern’ means— 

6 ‘‘(1) the People’s Republic of China; 

7 ‘‘(2) the Russian Federation; 

8 ‘‘(3) the Islamic Republic of Iran; 

9 ‘‘(4) the Democratic People’s Republic of 

10 Korea; 

11 ‘‘(5) the Republic of Cuba; and 

12 ‘‘(6) the Syrian Arab Republic.’’. 

13 (b) EXEMPTIONS.—Section 3 of the Foreign Agents 

14 Registration Act of 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 613), 

15 is amended, in the matter preceding subsection (a), by in16 serting ‘‘, except that the exemptions under subsections 

17 (d)(1) and (h) shall not apply to any agent of a foreign 

18 principal that is a country of concern’’ before the colon. 

19 (c) SUNSET.—The amendments made by subsections 

20 (a) and (b) shall terminate on October 1, 2026. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Borris M. Komar v. City of New York.

Application- dismissed, with $10 costs, inasmuch as the motion for leave to appeal was not timely made and has no merit. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
#### § 1006.4 Plant.

See § 1000.4.
RECEIVED 

MAR 0 7 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

In the Matter of : 

Schuman Aviation Company, Ltd. 

Respondent 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

____________________________ ) 

FAA DOCKET: To Be Assigned 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-1080 

FAA CASE NO. 2012WP130065 

RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO ADMINISTRATOR'S COMPLAINT 

SCHUMAN AVIATION, LTD., Respondent above-named, by his undersigned counsel, hereby 

answers the Administrator's Complaint dated February 12, 2014 and emailed on February 14, 2014 as 

follows: 

FIRST DEFENSE 

1. The Administrator's Complaint fails to state a cause of action upon which relief can be 

granted. 

SECOND DEFENSE 

2. Respondent admits the allegations in paragraphs I; II, 1.,2.,3.,4., and 7. of the 

Administrator's Complaint. 

3. Respondent is without knowledge of the actual date in the allegation contained in 

paragraph II, 5. of the Administrator's Complaint, and therefore denies same. 

4. Respondent denies the allegation contained in paragraph II, 6. of the Administrator's 

Complaint. 

5. Respondent denies the applicability of paragraph Ill, a. and band paragraph IV, Land 2. of 

the Administrator's Complaint. 
2. 

THIRD DEFENSE 

6. Respondent intends to rely on any and all Affirmative Defenses that are available, the 

applicability of which may be determined and/or disclosed by investigation and/or 

discovery. 

WHEREFORE, the Respondent, respectfully requests that the Administrative Law Judge enter an 

order denying the Administrator's Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty in the amount of 

$28,000.00. 

DATED: ___ tJ_2_._2_C,_._2_t7_~_4--_ HONOLULU, HAWAII 

CHRISTOPHER 

~~- D. FERRARA 

Attorney for Respondent 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave. S.W. 

Washington, DC 2.0591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Ste. 2.W1000 

ONE COPY 

Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Western Pacific Region, AWP-7 

FAA 

P.O. Box 92.007 

los Angeles, CA 90009-2.007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-2.0 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

12.00 New Jersey Ave. S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 2.0590