alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Rae, Respondent, *v.*Hotel Governor Clinton, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

— Order, entered on June 17, 1964, granting plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of a receiver in a mortgage foreclosure .action, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs- and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent, to the extent of terminating the receivership on condition that the parties continue to abide by the provisions contained in the order of this court, entered July 7,1964, granting *645a stay of certain proceedings pending determination of the appeal, some of which conditions are also contained in the order to show cause signed by a Justice of this court on June 17, 1964, and on the further condition that defendant-appellant pay expenses or disbursements, if any, incurred in connection with the receivership and provided no new defaults in payments due under the mortgage note in suit occur pending determination of the action, without prejudice to plaintiff-respondent making a new motion for the appointment of a receiver on the ground that any of the conditions have been breached, any new default has occurred, or for any new cause establishing hazard to the security for the mortgage debt. In view of the fact that the stay conditions provided, for various limitations protecting the security for the mortgage debt and allow of close supervision of the financial accounts of the mortgagor, there would seem to be no present need for the receivership. Thus the determination of the several issues, including that of the financial perquisites of Charles Zarucei should await determination of the action. Because the revenues of the hotel may suffer decline during the Winter season it is highly desirable that the action proceed to prompt trial and early determination. Should defendant-appellant be responsible for any extended delays in the prosecution of the action this, among the conditions specified, would entitle plaintiff-respondent to apply anew for the appointment of a receiver. (See, generally, 7 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., pars. 6401.03-6401.08.) Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Staley, JJ.
#### § 1033.6 Supply plant.

See § 1000.6.
#### § 1205.318 Contracting organization or association.

*Contracting organization or association* means the organization or association with which the Cotton Board has entered into a contract or agreement pursuant to § 1205.328(c).

[31 FR 16758, Dec. 31, 1966. Redesignated at 56 FR 64472, Dec. 10, 1991]
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0307

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM111AD

2000-32-073 --- 6/26/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
(December 6, 1979)

#### In the Matter of Francis M. Comins, Petitioner, v County of Delaware, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Delaware County) to review a determination of the Board of Supervisors of Delaware County, which dismissed petitioner from his position as Commissioner of Social Services for Delaware County. This matter was previously before this court and the pertinent facts need not be repeated here as they are sufficiently set forth in our memorandum decision in *Matter of Comins v County of Delaware*(66 AD2d 966). Determination was withheld and the matter was remitted by this court to the Trial Term of Supreme Court, Delaware County, for a trial and decision resolving the issue of whether petitioner filed his oath of office within 30 days after notice of his appointment, or within 30 days after commencement of his term pursuant to section 30 of the Public Officers Law. A trial was held and Trial Term determined that there was a failure to file an oath of office within the statutory period set forth in section 30 of the Public Officers Law. We are of the view that Trial Term properly decided the issue concerning petitioner’s failure to timely file an oath of office. As we previously stated, if petitioner did fail to timely file, no hearing on charges was required in order to dismiss him from office *(Matter of Comins v County of Delaware, supra).*Accordingly, the determination of the Board of Supervisors of Delaware County should be confirmed. Determination confirmed, and petitions dismissed, *699without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
#### Sylvain Celmayster, Appellant, v. Doris Sharp et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of (1) reversing that part thereof which grants judgment to defendant Doris Sharp in Action No. 2 of the consolidated action; (2) severing said Action No. 2 from the consolidated action; (3) granting a new trial upon the issues created by said cause of action and the answer thereto; (4) remanding said cause, which was originally commenced in the Municipal Court, to the Civil Court, New York County, for such new trial. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs. Action No. 2 was one to recover salary claimed to be due after an alleged wrongful discharge from employment. Defenses to that *874claim included alleged misconduct, insubordination and lack of co-operation, damages to the business and unlawful use of telephone services. The Trial Justice gave judgment on this phase of the consolidated action before appellant had any opportunity to present any evidence in support of his defenses to the claim. Unlike the other counterclaims, the validity of the claim for wages did not rest on the .basis of the plaintiff’s allegations of fraud for which he was seeking damages. Even though no cause of action for damages for fraud was proven, there still remained a triable issue as to Sharp’s action for wages. Since the original action for such wages was commenced in the then Municipal Court, the retrial of that severed action should be had in the Civil Court, New York County, to which court the severed action is directed to be transferred. We are not allowing costs to either party because both sides must share responsibility for the conduct of trial counsel in unduly and unnecessarily protracting the trial of issues which could adequately have been covered in much less time. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
----

|   | 1.10 | “Effective      Date” shall mean May 5, 2008, which is the day on which this License      Agreement shall begin effect. |
|--------|------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Vertigro      Algae Technologies, LLC.   |                                    | Valcent      Products, Inc.       |    |
|----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|---------|
|                                               |                                    |                              |    |   |   |
| Signed:                                            | /s/        Eldon Schorn  |                              | Signed: | /s/        George Orr |   |
| Name:                                              | Eldon      Schorn                  |                              | Name:   | F.      George Orr  |   |
| Title:                                             | Director                           |                              | Title:  | Director      and CFO |   |
|                                               |                                    |                              |    |   |   |
|                                               |                                    |                              |    |   |   |
| Pagic      LP                                      |                                    | West      Peak Ventures of Canada |    |
|                                               |                                    |                              |    |   |   |
| Signed:                                            | /s/        Perry Martin       |                              | Signed: | /s/        Tim Brock |   |
| Name:                                              | Perry      A Martin                     |                              | Name:   | Tim      Brock |   |
| Title:                                             | Managing      Partner              |                              | Title:  | President |   |
| Date:                                              |                                    |                              | Date:   |   |   |

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CLOVIS NELSON a/k/a C.B. NELSON and DONNET NELSON, 

Appellants,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al

Appellees.

No. 4D19-2180

[April 2, 2020]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Frank Ledee, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-

023619 CACE.

Robert Phaneuf of The Ticktin Law Group, Deerfield Beach, for 

appellants.

Ofer M. Amir, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee YJJ Investment Group LLC.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors

so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 14-BG-461

IN RE: SANDY F. THOMAS-BELLAMY,

Respondent.

Bar Registration No. 1011060 BDN: 107-14

BEFORE: Beckwith, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Terry, Senior Judges. 

ORDER

(FILED - August 21, 2014)

On consideration ofthe certified order indefinitelysuspending respondent from

the practice of law in the state of Maryland with a right to seek reinstatement after

six months, this court’s May 15, 2014, order directing respondent to show cause why

the functional equivalent reciprocal discipline in the form of a six- month suspension

with a fitness requirement should not be imposed, the statement of Bar Counsel, and

it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order

to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is

ORDERED that Sandy F. Thomas-Bellamy is hereby suspended from the

practice of law for a period of six months, with reinstatement contingent upon a

showing of fitness. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re Fuller, 930

A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline

applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of

respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as she files an affidavit

that fully complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 14 (g). 

PER CURIAM
#### ROGERS v. HERTER et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 23, 1906.)

Action by George W. Rogers against Peter Herter and others. G. O.

Maas, for plaintiff.

F. Y. Johnson, for defendants.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiff, respondent, against defendants, appellants, and with costs to defendant, respondent, against plaintiff, appellant.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105·3901

OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR 

### OCT 1 4 2009

The Honorable Louis Manuel Ak-Chin Indian Community 42507 W. Peters & Nall Road Maricopa, Arizona 85239 Dear Chairman Manuel:
In December 2008, then EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson sent a letter informing you ofthe designations for the 2006 24-hournational ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for fine particles (PM2.s). Yourreservation was located in an area that was designated as attainment/unclassifiable for that standard. Those designation decisions werebased onthe 2005-2007 airquality monitoring data, which were the most current data at that time. However, these designations were never finalized because they were not published in the Federal Register. Current EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson has reviewed the December 2008 decisions and has decided to promulgate area designations based on consideration ofnew 2006-2008 airquality monitoring data, the most recent data available. I am writingto inform you that, based on consideration of2006-2008 air quality monitoring data, one additional area in Arizona, Pinal County, appears to be violating the 2006 24-hour PM2.s NAAQS. Because your reservation is located within theboundaries ofPinal County, EPAis reviewing ourinitial recommendation for your reservation. EPA is deferringthe area designation for Pinal County so that EPA and the tribes may collect sufficient information to assess these areas before promulgating designations. As a first step in this process, EPA will gather and evaluate information. Once an evaluation is completed, we will notify you ofourintended designation for your reservation. We plan to announce intended designations within the next several months and at least 120 days priorto promulgating final designations. You will have an opportunity to comment on EPA's intended designation once it is announced.

Printed on Recycled PaperWelook forward to continuingto workwith you and your staffto develop designations for the 24-hourPM25 NAAQS in a timelymanner. Ifyou have any questions, please do nothesitateto contactme. Your air quality staffmay wish to contact Colleen McKaughan, Associate Air Division Director at (520) 498-0118. Sincerely,

# L~~ Acting Regional Administrator

cc: Roman Orona, Environmental Director

2
II 

Calendar No. 456 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1098 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2024 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 50 East Derry Road in East Derry, New 

Hampshire, as the ‘‘Chief Edward B. Garone Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHIEF EDWARD B. GARONE POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 50 East Derry Road in East 

6 Derry, New Hampshire, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘Chief Edward B. Garone Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1098 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chief Edward B. 

5 Garone Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 456 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1098 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostB. Garone Post Office’’. Derry, New Hampshire, as the ‘‘Chief Edward al Service located at 50 East Derry Road in East 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of YaSheng Group (the “Company”) on Form 10-K /A for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:    April 5, 2011By: /s/ Zhuang Hai YunZhuang Hai YunChief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
#### PRICE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK & B. DISPATCH EXPRESS CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 2, 1906.)

Action by Henry J. Price against the New York & Boston Dispatch Express Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 10.7

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$4,000.00 Las Vegas, Nevada February 28, 2003

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Twin Lakes, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Maker"),
promises to pay to the order of Estancia LLC (hereinafter referred to as
"Holder"), 18 Highland Creek, Henderson, Nevada 89052, or at such other address
as Holder may designate in writing, the principal sum of Four Thousand Dollars
($4,000) until paid, at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum.

The principal amount of the note shall be due and payable on or before 10/31/04.

Should the amount owing on this note not be paid when due, the entire unpaid
principal sum evidenced by this Note will, without notice to the Maker, become
due and payable.

Maker hereby waives presentment of payment, protect and demand, notice of
protest, demand and dishonor and nonpayment of this Note, and consents that the
holder may extend the time of payment or otherwise modify the terms of payment
or any part or whole of the indebtedness evidenced by this Note as the request
of any other person liable hereon, and consent shall not alter nor diminish the
liability of any party hereunder.

Maker may repay the indebtedness evidenced hereby in whole or in part from time
to time without premium or penalty.

As used herein, Holder shall include any subsequent holder of this Note. Maker
shall have no right to assign this Note without the consent of Holder, and in no
event shall any assignment of this Note by Maker act to release Maker from any
obligations hereunder unless such release is evidenced in writing by Holder.

This Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of Nevada.

Witness the hand of the undersigned this 28th day of February 2003.


                                    TWIN LAKES, INC.


                                    By: /s/ Johnny Thomas
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Johnny Thomas, President
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Zaf Sungur, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form  10-KSB of  Brookmount  Explorations,  Inc.,  for the fiscal year
ended November 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained
in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Brookmount Explorations, Inc.

Date: February 28, 2007

/s/: Zaf Sungur
---------------------------------------------
Zaf Sungur, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
Principal Accounting Officer
570.703 GSAR contract clauses. ( a ) Insert clauses substantially the same as the following in solicitations and contracts for leasehold interests in real property that exceed the simplified lease acquisition threshold, unless the contracting officer determines that a clause is not appropriate. The contracting officer shall document the file with the basis for omitting or substantially changing a clause. A deviation is not required under section 570.704 to determine that a clause in this section is not appropriate. The following clauses may be inserted in solicitations and contracts for leasehold interests in real property at or below the simplified lease acquisition threshold. 552.215-70 Examination of Records by GSA. 552.270-4 Definitions. Insert this clause if including the clause at 552.270-28. 552.270-5 Subletting and Assignment. 552.270-6 Maintenance of Building and Premises—Right of Entry. 552.270-7 Fire and Casualty Damage. 552.270-8 Compliance with Applicable Law. 552.270-9 Inspection—Right of Entry. 552.270-10 Failure in Performance. 552.270-11 Successors Bound. 552.270-12 Alterations. 552.270-13 Proposals for Adjustment. 552.270-14 Changes. 552.270-15 Liquidated Damages. Insert this clause in solicitations and contracts if you have a critical requirement to meet the delivery date and you cannot establish an actual cost for the loss to the Government resulting from late delivery. 552.270-16 Adjustment for Vacant Premises. 552.270-17 Delivery and Condition. 552.270-18 Default in Delivery—Time Extensions. 552.270-19 Progressive Occupancy. 552.270-20 Payment. 552.270-21 Effect of Acceptance and Occupancy. 552.270-22 Default by Lessor During the Term. 552.270-23 Subordination, Nondisturbance and Attornment 552.270-24 Statement of Lease. 552.270-25 Substitution of Tenant Agency. 552.270-26 No Waiver. 552.270-27 Integrated Agreement. 552.270-28 Mutuality of Obligation. 552.270-29 Acceptance of Space.
( b ) Insert the following clauses in solicitations and contracts for leasehold interests in real property: 552.270-30 Price Adjustment for Illegal or Improper Activity. 552.270-31 Prompt Payment. 552.270-32 Covenant Against Contingent Fees.
( c ) Insert the representation clause at 552.270-33, Foreign Ownership and Financing Representation for High-Security Leased Space, in novations, solicitations and contracts for leased space that: ( 1 ) Will be occupied by Federal employees for nonmilitary activities; and
( 2 ) Has a facility security level of III, IV, or V.
( d ) Insert the clause at 552.270-34 Access Limitations for High-Security Leased Space, in novations, solicitations and contracts for leased space that: ( 1 ) Will be occupied by Federal employees for nonmilitary activities; and
( 2 ) Has a facility security level of III, IV, or V.
[76 FR 30854, May 27, 2011, as amended at 86 FR 55525, Oct. 6, 2021; 88 FR 9766, Feb. 15, 2023]