alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Student Loan Debt Relief      

# Resource: Student Loan Debt Relief

This issue paper (PDF, 6 pages) presents ED’s initial set of considerations for creating a path to debt relief for borrowers in need. The paper identifies five questions about distinct categories of affected borrowers for which the agency is seeking feedback. Categories of affected borrowers include: 
                  -  Those whose balances are greater than what they originally borrowed  
                  -  Those whose loans first entered repayment decades ago  
                  -  Those who attended programs that did not provide sufficient financial values  
                  -  Those who are eligible for relief under programs like IDR but have not applied   
                  -  Those who have experienced financial hardship and need support that the current student loan system does not adequately address  

**Learn more** (PDF, 6 pages).
#### 970.0309-1 Applicability.

The contracting officer shall refer to subpart 903.9 regarding the applicability of the DOE Employee Protection Program to management and operating contracts.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36370, July 22, 2009]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Paul Burley, Appellant, v. American Locomotive Company, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which denied reduced earnings (except for one week in which claimant did not work), the board finding that for the 39 weeks’ period in question his average weekly wage was in excess of that prior to his disablement. The periods involved are those, or embraced by those, which were in issue upon a prior appeal (2 A D 2d 621), when we said that by reason of the great variations in claimant’s wages from week to week (fluctuating between a *1003low of $32.34 and a high of $192.69 in the year prior to his disablement and from less than $50 to more than $200 thereafter), “the only fair method of determining his *‘*actual earnings ’ [Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 5-a] is to select some reasonable period and average his earnings.” (p. 622.) This the board has now done. The “very unusual circumstances” here present were noted in another case subsequently decided. (See *Matter of Liperman*v. *Giller,*6 A D 2d 732.) Decision and award unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
#### GORDON, Appellant, v. ASHLEY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by Louisa G~don, as ó~dmini~ttktri±, etc., and Jo~eph *1119Gordon, as administrator, etc., of Joseph Gordon, Jr., deceased, against Eugene L. Ashley.

PER CIJRIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

000HRANE, J., dissents.
#### § 1051.40 Classes of utilization.

See § 1000.40.
1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 17, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20578

KENNETH M. MORRIS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; ET AL,

Defendants,

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas, Houston

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is granted, and

our prior opinion herein issued July 24, 2006 is hereby modified,

to the extent set forth below and not otherwise.

The sentence in our July 24, 2006 opinion reading

“The district court had jurisdiction based on diversity

of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and we have
2

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.”

is hereby withdrawn and is replaced by the following:

“The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §

1331 and 15 U.S.C. § 1681p, and we have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.”

In all other respects the motion for rehearing is denied and

our July 24, 2006 opinion, as hereinabove modified, remains in full

force and effect.
#### McDOUGALL, Appellant, v. CITY OF BUFFALO et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 3, 1906.)

Action by James S. McDougall against the city of Buffalo and Mary Anna White.

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements against the respondent White, and motion to set aside order for examination granted, except as to that part of said order which permits a physical examination.

WILLIAMS, J., dissents.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**STATEMENT
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Bruce
      A. Kehr, of InforMedix Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)
            the
                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
                December 31, 2007, to which this certification accompanies (the “Annual
                Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
            the
                information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Company.





Dated:  April
      8,
      2008





***s/
                Bruce A. Kehr***Bruce
                A. Kehr,Chief
                Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to InforMedix Holdings, Inc. and will be
      retained by InforMedix Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32-5****Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 United States Code**     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the quarterlyreport onForm 10-Q of PECOEnergy Company for the quarterly period ended March 31,2006, that (i) the report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained inthe report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of PECO EnergyCompany.     /s/ John L. Skolds       John L. Skolds     President     Exelon Energy DeliveryDate: April 26, 2006
135
EXHIBIT
23.3
 
 
 
 
 Consent
of Independent Petroleum Engineers and Geologists
 
 
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-157406) on Form S-3 and the Registration Statements (No. 333-108162,
333-118976, 333-118977, 333-124964, 333-143203, 333-143204 and 333-158922) on
Form S-8 of Noble Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) of the reference to Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc. and the inclusion of our report dated January 21,
2010 in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, of
the Company and its subsidiaries, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
  NETHERLAND,
      SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:
              /s/ Danny D. Simmons, P.E.Danny
      D. Simmons, P.E.President
      and Chief Operating Officer
 
 Houston,
Texas
 February
18, 2010
  1
#### 6104.408 Payment of successful claims [Rule 408].

The agency shall pay amounts the Board determines are due the claimant.
(January 28, 1980)

#### Allan Altman et al., for Themselves and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v Howard L. Phillips et al., Defendants, and I. Jules Rosen, Respondent.

— In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for fraud, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered August 18, 1978, which granted the motion of defendant Rosen for judgment dismissing the complaint as against him. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. On oral argument the parties agreed that the motion of defendant Rosen was to be treated as one for summary judgment. The movant’s papers made out a prima facie case for the grant of the motion and plaintiffs’ opposing papers were insufficient to show that there was a bona fide issue of fact. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Rabin, JJ., concur.
State of Israel Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Authority

**Page 1 of 1** AD 01-10-01-07R1 **Date: January 20, 2010**

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

**This Airworthiness Directive, issued by the Civil A viation Authority in accordance with the**  **Israeli Aviation Regulations applies to an aircraft for which our records list you as the registered**  **owner. It affects aviation safety and requires your immediate attention. No person may operate an**  **aircraft, to which an Airworthiness Directive appli es, except in accordance with that Directive.** 

APPLIES TO **:** Gulfstream Aerospace L.P. **models** GALAXY **and** G200 **aircraft all**

**serial numbers certificated in any category.**

SUBJECT: **This AD mandates a new limitation in the G200 AFM, pertaining to** 

**operation of the Air Brakes. The new limitation pro hibits deployment of the**  **Air Brakes above 360 KIAS/0.79 Mi, and this is inco rporated in Rev. 14 to** 

**the AFM.**

REASON: **Extension of airbrakes above 360 KIAS / 0.79 M i**  **results in aerodynamic**

**driven vibration of the airbrake which, if not limi ted per Revision 14 to the**  **AFM, can lead to high cycle fatigue failure of the airbrake in board hinge.** 

Reason for

Revision 1: **Due to a typo error in the initial issue of this A D, Revision 1 updates the** 

**designation and removes the "emergency" from the ti tle of the AD.** 

ACTION: **Each operator must incorporate Rev. 14 to the G200 AFM.** 

COMPLIANCE **: Compliance within 60 days from the effective dat e of this AD.** 

EFFECTIVE DATE **: Revision 1: January 20, 2010. Initial issue: January 15, 2010** 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT **: Mr. Boaz Keren, CAAI, Engineering and Manufacturing Branch, P.O.Box 8, Be**  **n-Gurion Airport, Israel 70100. Telephone: 972-3-9774549, Fax: 972-3-9774592, e-m**  **ail: kerenb@mot.gov.il**
§ 1.193 Time for filing application. ( a ) An application may be filed whenever the applicant has prevailed in the proceeding or in a significant and discrete substantive portion of the proceeding, but in no case later than 30 days after final disposition of the proceeding by the Department.
( b ) For the purposes of this subpart, final disposition means the date on which a decision or order disposing of the merits of the proceeding or any other complete resolution of the proceeding, such as a settlement or voluntary dismissal, become final and unappealable, both within the Department and to the courts.
( c ) If review or reconsideration is sought or taken of a decision as to which an applicant believes it has prevailed, proceedings for the award of fees shall be stayed pending final disposition of the underlying controversy. When the United States appeals the underlying merits of an adversary adjudication to a court, no decision on an application for fees and other expenses in connection with that adversary adjudication shall be made until a final and unreviewable decision is rendered by the court on the appeal or until the underlying merits of the case have been finally determined pursuant to the appeal.
#### 970.2301-1 Policy.

There are many environmentally beneficial and resource efficient programs described in various subparts of FAR Part 23. For ease of use, DOE refers to all of these as the DOE Sustainable Acquisition Program with guidance for the many products at *http://www.hss.energy.gov/pp/epp.* Contractors operating DOE facilities shall comply with the requirements of Executive Order 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy and Transportation Management, and Executive Order 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance. The contractor shall also consider the best practices within the DOE Acquisition Guide, Chapter 23, *Acquisition Considerations Regarding Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance.*

[75 FR 57695, Sept. 22, 2010]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6462

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROGER TRENTON DAVIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-91-137, CA-97-292-R) Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Trenton Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Hooge Mott, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: The district court entered an order denying Davis’ 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) motion on March 17, 1998. On March 11, 1999, Davis moved for relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and to file a late notice of appeal. The district court denied both motions. Davis timely appealed. We have reviewed the record andthe district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal based upon the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Davis , No. CA-97-292-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 19, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Guidance: Raising Awareness on Specific Learning Disabilities      

# Guidance: Raising Awareness on Specific Learning Disabilities

This guidance for state and local educational agencies clarifies that students with specific learning disabilities — such as dyslexia, dyscalculia, and dysgraphia — have unique educational needs. The guidance also clarifies that there is nothing in the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act prohibiting the use of the terms dyslexia, dyscalculia, and dysgraphia in a student’s evaluation, determination of eligibility for special education and related services, or in developing the student’s individualized education program. 

http://blog.ed.gov/2015/10/raising-awareness-on-specific-learning-disabilities/?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
Marc h 4 , 201 0

Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretary Unite d State s Departmen to fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D.C

. 

### 2059 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretaryLaHood : A s a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n suppor to fAmerican' s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m Ne wYork' s Joh n F

. Kenned yInternationa l Airpor tan d Lo s Angele s Internationa l Airpor t t o Toky o Internationa l Airpor ta t Haneda

. I recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam a administratio n fo ryou rsucces s las t Decembe ri n reachin g a landmar k

Ope n Skie s agreemen twit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e b y U.S

. airlines

. I encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m Ne wYor k an d Lo s Angele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o fth e world' s larges t financia l an d commerc e centers

. Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen tt o th e trans-Pacifi cmarket

. America n i s likewis e committe d t o Ne wYor k an d Los Angele s - bot h vita l foca l point s o f business , trade , entertainment , technolog yan d educatio n - providin g unsurpasse d ai rservic e sinc e th e mid-1900 s Bot h th e Ne wYor k

an d Los Angele s metr o area s wil l gai n significan t economi cbenefit s fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , a s wil l American' s customer s an d employees

. However , w e nee d you rhel p t o mak e th e JF K& LAX/Haned a connectio n a reality

. Therefore , I strongl yurg e yo u t o sa yye s t o America n Airline s an d it s reques tfo rslot s t o fl y fro m Kenned yan d Lo

s Angele s t o Haneda ! Sincerely ,

Ti m Fitz Executiv e Directo r Camelo t Worl d Trave l 

# '•Kmm
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; BRAIN Biology and Biophysics of Neural Stimulations and Recording Technologies.                    

*Date:*                         March 23, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mirela Milescu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/NIH NSC, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20852,                         *mirela.milescu@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 24, 2021. 

Tyeshia M. Roberson, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-04298 Filed 3-1-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P