alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). JC/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T WI L L I AM S AN F OR D G AD D, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 16968 D . C. N o . 0 6 - c v - 0 0 6 5 1 - RCC

ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona R a ne rC . C ol l i ns , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B e f o r e : F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , a n dM . S M I T H , C ir c u it J u d g e s . F eder al pri soner W i l l i am S anford G add app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct court ’ s deni al of the m ot i on he fi l ed pu rs uantt o F eder al R ul e of C i vi l P roce du re 6 0 (b ). W e h av e j u ri sd i ct i o n p u rsu an tt o 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 9 1 , an dw e d i sm i ss. 

# FI LED MA R 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ C/ Res ea r ch 07- 16968 2 G a dd c ont e nds the di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d byde ny i ng hi s m ot i on ba s e d on procedural grou nd s. “ [W ] here the un derl yi ng j ud gm enthas bee n app ea l ed, deni al of a m ot i on for r el i ef

fr om thatj ud gm enti s ano napp ea l abl e order. ” G ou ld v. Mu tu a l Li f e I n s . Co . o f N. Y. , 79 0 F . 2d 76 9, 77 2 (9th C i r. 19 86 ). T he prop er pr oc e dur e t o s e e k R ul e 60( b) r e l i e f dur i ng the pe nde nc yof a n appe a l i s t o a s k the di stri ctcourtw hether i tw i shes t o ent ert ai n the m ot i on , or t o g ranti t , and then m o v e th is c o u rt, if

ap p r o p r ia te , f

o rr e m a n do f

th e c a s e . Scot t

v. Y ou ng er , 739 F . 2d 1464, 1466 ( 9th C i r . 1984) . “ I f tha tr out e i s nott a ke n, a n appe a l of the de ni a l of the [R ul e 60(b) m ot i on ] i s s ubj ec tt o d i sm i ss al . ” G o u ld , 7 9 0 F .2 da t 7 7 2 . I n th is c a s e , th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d is m is s e dG a d d ’s h ab e a s c o rp u s p e titio n . G a d d th e n f

ile d an o tic e o f

ap p e a l. W h ile h is ap p e a l w a s p e n d in g , h e f ile daR u le 60 (b) m ot i on i n the di stri ctcourt . H ow ever , G add fai l ed t o fol l ow the prop er p r o c e d u r e in s e e k in g to h a v e th e d is tr ic t c o u rt ru le o n h is R u le 6 0 ( b ) m o tio n . A c c o r d in g ly , w e d is m is s G a d d ’s ap p e a l. Se e Sc o tt , 7 3 9 F .2 da t 1 4 6 6 . F in a lly , w e d e n yG a d d ’s r e q u e s t to e x p a n dth e c e rtif ic a te o f ap p e a lab ilityto in c lu d e h is c la im th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt in W e s t V ir g in iad idn o t h a v e ju r is d ic tio n to in d ic t h im . Se e Hi i v ala v . W ood , 195 F . 3d 1098, 1103- 05 ( 9th C i r . 1999) (percuri am ). DI S MI S S E D.
§ 1033.31 Payroll reports. ( a ) On or before the 22nd day after the end of each month, each handler that operates a pool plant pursuant to § 1033.7 and each handler described in § 1000.9(c) shall report to the market administrator its producer payroll for the month, in the detail prescribed by the market administrator, showing for each producer the information described in § 1033.73(e).
( b ) Each handler operating a partially regulated distributing plant who elects to make payment pursuant to § 1000.76(b) shall report for each dairy farmer who would have been a producer if the plant had been fully regulated in the same manner as prescribed for reports required by paragraph (a) of this section.
970.1504-1-5 General considerations and techniques for determining fixed fees. ( a ) The Department's fee policy recognizes that fee is remuneration to contractors for the entrepreneurial function of organizing and managing resources, the use of their resources (including capital resources), and, as appropriate, their assumption of the risk that some incurred costs (operating and capital) may not be reimbursed.
( b ) Use of a purely cost-based structured approach for determining fee objectives and amounts for DOE management and operating contracts is inappropriate considering the limited level of contractor cost, capital goods, and operating capital outlays for performance of such contracts. Instead of being solely cost-based, the desirable approach calls for a structure that allows evaluation of the following eight significant factors, as outlined in order of importance, and the assignment of appropriate fee values (subject to the limitations on fixed fee in 970.1504-1-6)— ( 1 ) The presence or absence of financial risk, including the type and terms of the contract;
( 2 ) The relative difficulty of work, including specific performance objectives, environment, safety and health concerns, and the technical and administrative knowledge, and skill necessary for work accomplishment and experience;
( 3 ) Management risk relating to performance, including— ( i ) Composite risk and complexity of principal work tasks required to do the job;
( ii ) Labor intensity of the job;
( iii ) Special control problems; and
( iv ) Advance planning, forecasting and other such requirements;
( 4 ) Degree and amount of contract work required to be performed by and with the contractor's own resources, as compared to the nature and degree of subcontracting and the relative complexity of subcontracted efforts, subcontractor management and integration;
( 5 ) Size and operation (number of locations, plants, differing operations, etc.);
( 6 ) Influence of alternative investment opportunities available to the contractor (i.e., the extent to which undertaking a task for the Government displaces a contractor's opportunity to make a profit with the same staff and equipment in some other field of activity);
( 7 ) Benefits which may accrue to the contractor from gaining experience and knowledge of how to do something, from establishing or enhancing a reputation, or from having the opportunity to hold or expand a staff whose loyalties are primarily to the contractor; and
( 8 ) Other special considerations, including support of Government programs such as those relating to small and minority business subcontracting, energy conservation, etc.
( c ) The total fee objective for a particular annual fixed fee negotiation is established by evaluating the factors in this subsection, assigning fee values to them, and totaling the resulting amounts (subject to limitations on total fixed fee in 48 CFR 970.1504-1-6).
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36371, July 22, 2009]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1056 

To require the Comptroller General to conduct a study to assess certain 

environmental review processes with regard to offshore wind projects, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2023 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Comptroller General to conduct a study to 

assess certain environmental review processes with regard 

to offshore wind projects, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OFFSHORE WIND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 

4 PROCESS STUDY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—No later than 60 days after the 

6 enactment of this bill, the Comptroller General shall con7 duct a study to assess the sufficiency of the environmental 

8 review processes for offshore wind projects in place as of 

9 the date of the enactment of this section of the national 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1056 IH

1 Marine Fisheries Service, the Bureau of Ocean Energy 

2 Management, and any other relevant Federal agency. 

3 (b) CONTENTS.—The study required under sub4 section (a) shall include consideration of— 

5 (1) the impacts of offshore wind projects on 

6 whales, finfish, marine mammals, benthic resources, 

7 commercial and recreational fishing, air quality and 

8 greenhouse gas emissions, cultural, historical, and 

9 archaeological resources, invertebrates, and essential 

10 fish habitat, military use and navigation/vessel traf11 fic; recreation and tourism, and sustainability of 

12 shoreline beaches and inlets; 

13 (2) how the agencies determines which stake14 holders are consulted and if a timely, comprehensive 

15 comment period is provided for local representatives 

16 and interested parties; and 

17 (3) the estimated cost and who pays for the off18 shore wind projects. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Amos
      Eiran, the Chief Executive Officer of Tissera, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended July
      31,
      2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                October 29, 2007By:
            /s/Amos
                EiranName:
            Amos
                EiranTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer
#### 970.0407-1-3 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 970.5204-3, *Access to and Ownership of Records,* in management and operating contracts and other contracts and resulting subcontracts that contain the clause at 48 CFR 970.5223-1, *Integration of Environment, Safety, and Health into Work Planning and Execution* clause, or the clause at 48 CFR 952.223-72, *Radiation Protection and Nuclear Criticality.*

[79 FR 56285, Sept. 19, 2014]
#### 852.215-72 Notice of Intent to Re-Solicit.

As prescribed at 815.370-5, use the following provision:

# Notice of Intent to Re-Solicit (OCT 2019)

This solicitation provides offerors fewer than 30 days to submit proposals. In the event that only one offer is received in response to this solicitation, the Contracting Officer may cancel the solicitation and re-solicit for an additional period of at least 30 days in accordance with 815.370-2.

(End of provision)

[84 FR 46454, Sept. 4, 2019]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-30026

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSEPH D. MELANCON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:13-CR-132-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Joseph D. Melancon has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Melancon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 30, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-30026 Document: 00513288526 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/30/2015
No. 15-30026

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-30026 Document: 00513288526 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/30/2015
#### 952.203-70 Whistleblower protection for contractor employees.

As prescribed in 903.971, insert the following clause:

# Whistleblower Protection for Contractor Employees (DEC 2000)

(a) The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of “DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program” at 10 CFR part 708 for work performed on behalf of DOE directly related to activities at DOE-owned or -leased sites.

(b) The Contractor shall insert or have inserted the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (b), in subcontracts at all tiers, for subcontracts involving work performed on behalf of DOE directly related to activities at DOE-owned or leased sites.

(End of clause)

[65 FR 81008, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36368, 36378, July 22, 2009]
#### Alex W. CHERBANAEFF and Ann Cherbanaeff, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 2007-5166.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 17, 2007.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
related Form 10-Q financial statements for Ohio Edison Company and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
(Amounts in 1,000's.)Income tax expense includes $5,936,000 related to
other income.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000073960
<NAME> OHIO EDISON COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,732,595
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  1,319,093
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         762,831
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,105,960
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,920,479
<COMMON>                                             1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    2,098,728
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            586,443
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,685,172
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          145,000
<PREFERRED>                                    211,870
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,220,693
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             233,444
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 119,965
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  474,022
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        5,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 3,857
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,821,456
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                8,920,479
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      633,118
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            53,699
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     450,405
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     498,168
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        134,950
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               9,318
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 144,268
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        56,462
<NET-INCOME>                                    87,806
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,913
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   84,893
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        81,738
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      197,987
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         159,159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10180 

To amend the National Marine Sanctuary Act to prohibit requiring an authorization for the installation, operation, maintenance, repair, or recovery 

of undersea fiber optic cables in a national marine sanctuary if such 

activities have previously been authorized by a Federal or State agency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 20, 2024 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia (for himself, Mr. DUNN of Florida, Mr. BILIRAKIS, 

Mr. PFLUGER, Mrs. CAMMACK, and Mr. WEBER of Texas) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Marine Sanctuary Act to prohibit 

requiring an authorization for the installation, operation, 

maintenance, repair, or recovery of undersea fiber optic 

cables in a national marine sanctuary if such activities 

have previously been authorized by a Federal or State 

agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 10180 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING AUTHORIZA2 TIONS FOR UNDERSEA FIBER OPTIC CABLES 

3 PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY FEDERAL OR 

4 STATE AGENCIES. 

5 The National Marine Sanctuary Act (16 U.S.C. 1431 

6 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 310 the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 310A. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING AUTHORIZA9 TIONS FOR UNDERSEA FIBER OPTIC CABLES 

10 PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED BY FEDERAL OR 

11 STATE AGENCIES. 

12 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other pro13 vision of this Act, the Secretary may not prohibit or re14 quire any authorization for the installation, continued 

15 presence, operation, maintenance, repair, or recovery of 

16 undersea fiber optic cables in a national marine sanctuary 

17 if a license, lease, or permit issued by a Federal or State 

18 agency authorizing such installation, continued presence, 

19 operation, maintenance, repair, or recovery is in effect. 

20 ‘‘(b) INTERAGENCY COOPERATION.—The Secretary 

21 may direct the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin22 istration to engage in interagency cooperation under sec23 tion 304(d) in any Federal agency action described in that 

24 section and involving the installation, continued presence, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 10180 IH

1 operation, maintenance, repair, or recovery of undersea 

2 fiber optic cables in a national marine sanctuary.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           NCFY Voices: The Youth Dreamers Think Big      

# NCFY Voices: The Youth Dreamers Think Big

Two young people from Youth Dreamers share how they raised money to build a safe place for youth in their community to go after school. Youth Dreamers is a youth leadership group in Baltimore, MD.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c7HKLwh56U
!"c$

!"c$

?3⁄4

A

g

u

a

F r i a

R i v

e r

Tonto National Forest

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Area

BLACK CANYON CITY

CORDES

JUNCTION

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: Land Status legend located

on Map 1-1

Note: The Bureau of Land Management

(BLM) conducts land use planning only

in the areas administered by BLM. BLM

has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation

of the State of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by

BLM, or to the accuracy, reliability or

completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National

Map Accuracy Standards. This information

may be updated without notification.

±

Map 2-17

Agua Fria

National Monument

Route Network

Alternative B

0 1 2

Miles

Interstate

Highway

Agua Fria

National Monument

Planning Area

Major Road

Minor Road

Major River, Streams or

Wash

Route Network Implementation

Level Decisions

Proposed For Closure

Designation as Open

Proposed New
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John Mendrinos, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commisisoner, Respondent.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by claimant from a decision denying unemployment insurance benefits. The claimant, a chef, employed at a race track, had been advised on prior occasions not to carve meat in advance to which had been attributed the cause of food poisoning. At the hearing the claimant admitted that he had disobeyed the instructions which resulted in his dismissal. The board found .that the credible evidence established such fact and there is substantial evidence to sustain its finding. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.