alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Community-Led Suicide Prevention Toolkit      

# Resource: Community-Led Suicide Prevention Toolkit

This web toolkit provides step-by-step information and tools for comprehensive suicide prevention. The toolkit provides guidance about how to use these seven elements of comprehensive suicide prevention: 
                  -  Unity – how to develop broad-based support for a unified vision  
                  -  Data – how to use data to guide action and improve efforts  
                  -  Planning – how to use a strategic planning process  
                  -  Fit – how to align activities with community culture and needs  
                  -  Integration – how to use multiple, complementary approaches  
                  -  Communication – how to communicate clearly, safely, and consistently  
                  -  Sustainability – how to create long-lasting change  

**Learn more.**
#### PEOPLE ex rel. LA CHICOTTE, Appellant, v. BEST, Com’r, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 25, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people, on the relation of Henry A. La Chicotte, against George E. Best as commissioner.

No opinion.. Motion granted. Order resettled.
52.102 Incorporating provisions and clauses. ( a ) Provisions and clauses should be incorporated by reference to the maximum practical extent, rather than being incorporated in full text, even if they— ( 1 ) Are used with one or more alternates or on an optional basis;
( 2 ) Are prescribed on a “substantially as follows” or “substantially the same as” basis, provided they are used verbatim;
( 3 ) Require modification or the insertion by the Government of fill-in material (see 52.104); or
( 4 ) Require completion by the offeror or prospective contractor. This instruction also applies to provisions completed as annual representations and certifications.
( b ) Except for provisions and clauses prescribed in 52.107, any provision or clause that can be accessed electronically by the offeror or prospective contractor may be incorporated by reference in solicitations and/or contracts. However, the contracting officer, upon request, shall provide the full text of any provision or clause incorporated by reference.
( c ) Agency approved provisions and clauses prescribed in agency acquisition regulations, and provisions and clauses not authorized by subpart 52.3 to be incorporated by reference, need not be incorporated in full text, provided the contracting officer includes in the solicitation and contract a statement that— ( 1 ) Identifies all provisions and clauses that require completion by the offeror or prospective contractor;
( 2 ) Specifies that the provisions and clauses must be completed by the offeror or prospective contractor and must be submitted with the quotation or offer; and
( 3 ) Identifies to the offeror or prospective contractor at least one electronic address where the full text may be accessed.
( d ) An agency may develop a group listing of provisions and clauses that apply to a specific category of contracts. An agency group listing may be incorporated by reference in solicitations and/or contracts in lieu of citing the provisions and clauses individually, provided the group listing is made available electronically to offerors and prospective contractors.
( e ) A provision or clause that is not available electronically to offerors and prospective contractors shall be incorporated in solicitations and/or contracts in full text if it is— ( 1 ) A FAR provision or clause that otherwise is not authorized to be incorporated by reference (see subpart 52.3); or
( 2 ) A provision or clause prescribed for use in an agency acquisition regulation.
( f ) Provisions or clauses may not be incorporated by reference by being listed in the— ( 1 ) Provision at 52.252-3, Alterations in Solicitations; or
( 2 ) Clause at 52.252-4, Alterations in Contract.
[62 FR 64927, Dec. 9, 1997]
**Exhibit 32-b**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCinergy Corp., The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, PSI Energy, Inc.and The Union Light, Heat and Power Company (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lynn J. Good, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompanies.

 
| Date:  November 4,  2005 |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
| /s/                                     |  Lynn J. Good |   |
|                                    |  Lynn J. Good |
|                                    |  Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL LEON SANDERS, )

DOC #109311, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2519

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 20, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; J. Frank Porter, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public 

Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

BLACK, BADALAMENTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Income Statements and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         93
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                   277
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 26,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        14,161
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          250
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   26,144
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               629
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               64
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               24
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                147
<INCOME-TAX>                                   51
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            96
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   96
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.59




</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00001-CV

In re Great American Insurance Company of New York

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Edward Smith, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith

Filed: February 22, 2023
AFS-13-045-E 

January 30, 2013 

 Exemption No. 7980F 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-13274 

Mr. William Lamar Elder 

Counsel 

China Airlines, Ltd. 

555 Thirteenth Street, NW. 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Mr. Elder: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 7980, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect, and lists the 

conditions and limitations. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated October 17, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of China Airlines, Ltd. (CAL) for an extension of Exemption No. 7980, as 

amended. That exemption from §§ 61.77(a) and (b) and 63.23(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations allows CAL’s airmen who operate certain U.S.-registered aircraft that are 

leased to a non-U.S. citizen, for carrying persons or property for compensation or hire, to be 

eligible for a special purpose pilot authorization and a special purpose flight engineer 

certificate, without holding a current foreign license or certificate issued by a foreign 

contracting State to the Convention on International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

In your petition, you request relief from the provisions of § 61.77. You did not request 

extension of the provisions of § 63.23(a) and (b), which were previously granted to CAL. For 

that reason, this exemption has been amended to include only relief from the provisions of 

§ 61.77 you requested. 
 2

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to CAL. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 7980, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions 

and limitations. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. CAL’s airmen who operate under this exemption must hold appropriate licenses or 

certificates issued by the Taiwan Civil Aeronautics Administration. 

2. CAL may operate its Boeing 747-400 aircraft (Registration No. N168CL) under this 

exemption. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 7980, as amended, to 

February 28, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John M. Allen 

Director, Flight Standards Service
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: National Adoption Month Outreach Toolkit      

# Resource: National Adoption Month Outreach Toolkit

This toolkit (PDF, 14 pages) contains communication tools, resources, and information to help spread the word about National Adoption Month (NAM) this November.**Learn more**(PDF, 14 pages).
#### Broadwell America, Inc., Appellant, v Bram Will El LLC et al., Respondents.

[776 NYS2d 483]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula J. Omansky, J), entered March 6, 2003, which denied plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered September 15, 2003, which granted plaintiffs motion for clarification of the prior order and adhered to its determination that plaintiff was not entitled to a reduction in the purchase price or down payment for the premises, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The commercially reasonable meaning of the contract was that it was merely an option to purchase. The motion court properly gave effect to the limitation of remedies provisions in denying a reduction in the purchase price based on the sellers’ alleged misrepresentations *(see Chelsea v Seventh Chelsea Assoc.,*304 AD2d 498 [2003]; *cf. 9 Bros. Bldg. Supply Corp. v Buonamicia,*299 AD2d 529 [2002]), and declined to rewrite the contract to include the term sought by plaintiff *(see Chimart Assoc. v Paul,*66 NY2d 570, 573 [1986]). We have reviewed plaintiffs other contentions and find them unavailing. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.
#### Bernard Goldstein, Appellant, v Jack Block et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[777 NYS2d 180]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated June 26, 2003, which granted the separate motions of the defendants Jack Block and Josephine Block and the defendant Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB, which were, respectively, to strike the action from the trial calendar and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3404.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

By order entered November 30, 2000, this action was “marked off’ the trial calendar upon consent of all the parties. Thereafter, by order dated December 4, 2001, the action was dismissed as abandoned since “[i]t ha[d] not been restored to the calendar within one year as required by CPLR 3404.” Subsequently, as a result of ex parte contacts between the plaintiffs attorney and members of the Calendar Clerk’s Office in Nassau County in *670the summer and fall of 2002, the action was restored to the trial calendar in November 2002.

When an action has been stricken from the trial calendar and not restored within one year, a motion to vacate the automatic dismissal is required and the moving party must demonstrate the merits of the action, a reasonable excuse for the delay, the absence of an intent to abandon the matter, and the lack of prejudice to the nonmovant *(see Schwartz v Mandelbaum & Gluck,*266 AD2d 273 [1999]). In this case, the plaintiff failed to make such a motion. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motions. Santucci, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 15-A



[Letterhead of Deloitte & Touche LLP]

 Deloitte &
 Touche LLP
____________                      _________________________________________
                                  Suite 900        Telephone (313) 396-3000
                                  600 Renaissance Center
                                  Detroit, Michigan  48243-1704




Chrysler Financial Corporation
27777 Franklin Road
Southfield, Michigan




We have made a review,in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim
financial information of Chrysler Financial Corporation (a subsidiary of
Chrysler Corporation) and consolidated subsidiaries for the periods ended
June 30, 1998 and 1997, as indicated in our report dated July 9, 1998;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information. 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your 
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998,
is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-64179,
333-31093 and 333-49647 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


July 13, 1998

_______________
Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu
International  
_______________

<PAGE>







THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
#### William H. Burn, appellee, v. Lee Sturges, appellant.

Gen. Mr. 34,564.

Opinion filed March 24, 1931.

Scott, MacLeish & Falk, for appellant; John E. MacLeish and O. C. Sprague, of counsel.

C. E. Stenning, C. C. Cunningham and C. L. Mahony, for appellee; Chester D. Kern, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Kerner

delivered the opinion of the court.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Teachers Are Among the Most Educated, Yet Their Pay Lags      

# Resource: Teachers Are Among the Most Educated, Yet Their Pay Lags

This resource provides data on how teachers’ salaries compare to their similarly educated peers, when accounting for age and sex. Although teachers are among the nation’s most educated workers, they earn far less on average than most other highly educated workers and their earnings have declined since 2010. **Learn more.**
#### 852.246-70 [Reserved]