alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of International Trust and Financial
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Ellen Raidl, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.     The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                  /s/ Ellen Raidl
                                  ---------------------------------
                                  Ellen Raidl, Treasurer
                                  Date: April 14, 2004




<PAGE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resident Opportunities and Self Sufficiency Program      

# Resident Opportunities and Self Sufficiency Program

ROSS links public housing residents with supportive services, resident empowerment activities, and assistance in becoming economically self-sufficient

http://www.hud.gov/offices/pih/programs/ph/ross
#### 970.1707-1 Scope.

Pursuant to Section 33 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2053), DOE is authorized to make its facilities available to other Federal and non-Federal entities (sponsors) for the conduct of certain research and development and training activities. Pursuant to the Economy Act of 1932, as amended (31 U.S.C. 1535), or other applicable authority, other Federal entities may request DOE to conduct work. DOE has implemented these and other statutory authorities and requirements in its Strategic Partnership Projects Program. DOE's internal procedures governing the Strategic Partnership Projects Program are described in DOE Order 481.1C, DOE Order 481.1C, Strategic Partnership Projects (Formerly Known as Work for Others (Non-Department of Energy Funded Work)), or successor version.

[69 FR 75003, Dec. 15, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 15519, Mar. 24, 2015]
```

[Federal Register: September 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 184)]
[Notices]               
[Page 57905]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23se10-32]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

    1. Decisional Matter: Final Interpretative Rule: Interpretation of 
Children's Product.
    A live Webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: September 21, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24020 Filed 9-21-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
#### WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Api pellate Division, Second Department.

March 16, 1906.)

Action by Edna A. Williams, ar infant, etc., against the city of New York and the New "York Building Loan Banking Com-; pany.

No opinion. Order modified, by requiring as a condition of the amendment the! payment by the plaintiff of the trial fee of $3(1 and the disbursements of the defendant on the, trial, with $10 costs of the motion, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. ¡
**Exhibit 31-6** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO    RULE 13a-14(a)    AND    15d-14(a) OF    THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**     I, John F. Young, certify that:     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of PECO Energy Company;     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other    financial information included in this report, fairly present in    all material respects the financial condition, results of    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the    periods presented in this report;     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:       (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during    the period in which this report is being prepared;       (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure    controls and procedures and presented in this report our    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this    report based on such evaluation; and       (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during    the registrant’s third fiscal quarter that has materially    affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the    registrant’s internal control over financial    reporting; and     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):       (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and       (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or    other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  John    F. Young    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)     Date: October 27, 2006
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael T. Crowley, Jr.Michael T. Crowley, Jr.,Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32-6**
**Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code**
     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofPECO Energy Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, that (i) the report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of PECO Energy Company.     Date: July 26, 2005 /s/ John L. Skolds         John L. Skolds    President    Exelon Energy Delivery  
15
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         I, John C. Francis, President and Treasurer of Hunapu, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002, (the "Report") which this statement accompanies, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: April 7, 2003                       /s/ John C. Francis
                                        ----------------------------------
                                         John C. Francis
                                         President and Treasurer





                                       23
9.504 Contracting officer responsibilities. ( a ) Using the general rules, procedures, and examples in this subpart, contracting officers shall analyze planned acquisitions in order to— ( 1 ) Identify and evaluate potential organizational conflicts of interest as early in the acquisition process as possible; and
( 2 ) Avoid, neutralize, or mitigate significant potential conflicts before contract award.
( b ) Contracting officers should obtain the advice of counsel and the assistance of appropriate technical specialists in evaluating potential conflicts and in developing any necessary solicitation provisions and contract clauses (see 9.506).
( c ) Before issuing a solicitation for a contract that may involve a significant potential conflict, the contracting officer shall recommend to the head of the contracting activity a course of action for resolving the conflict (see 9.506).
( d ) In fulfilling their responsibilities for identifying and resolving potential conflicts, contracting officers should avoid creating unnecessary delays, burdensome information requirements, and excessive documentation. The contracting officer's judgment need be formally documented only when a substantive issue concerning potential organizational conflict of interest exists.
( e ) The contracting officer shall award the contract to the apparent successful offeror unless a conflict of interest is determined to exist that cannot be avoided or mitigated. Before determining to withhold award based on conflict of interest considerations, the contracting officer shall notify the contractor, provide the reasons therefor, and allow the contractor a reasonable opportunity to respond. If the contracting officer finds that it is in the best interest of the United States to award the contract notwithstanding a conflict of interest, a request for waiver shall be submitted in accordance with 9.503. The waiver request and decision shall be included in the contract file.
[48 FR 42142, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 42686, Oct. 22, 1990; 56 FR 55377, Oct. 25, 1991]
a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date:  November 10, 2009
    /s/ Michael J. BourgMichael J. BourgPresident, Chief Operating Officer
and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
§ 1.310 Default upon failure to file an answer. ( a ) If the respondent does not file an answer within the time prescribed in § 1.309(a) of this part, the reviewing official may refer the complaint together with proof of service to the ALJ and request that the ALJ issue an order of default imposing the penalties and assessments sought in the complaint. An answer must comply in all material respects with § 1.309(b) of this part in order to be considered filed within the time prescribed in § 1.310(a) of this part.
( b ) Upon the referral of the complaint under paragraph (a) of this section, the ALJ shall promptly serve on the respondent, in the manner prescribed in § 1.308 of this part, a notice that a decision will be issued under this section.
( c ) If the respondent fails to answer, the ALJ shall assume the facts alleged in the complaint to be true and, if such facts establish liability under § 1.303 of this part, the ALJ shall issue a decision imposing the penalties and assessments sought in the complaint, not to exceed the maximum amount allowed under the statute.
( d ) A respondent who fails to file a timely answer waives any right to a review of the penalty and assessment, unless he can demonstrate extraordinary circumstances justifying the failure to file an answer.
#### 947.7001 Policy.

Contractor foreign travel shall be conducted pursuant to the requirements contained in DOE Order 551.1C, or its successor, Official Foreign Travel, or any subsequent version of the order in effect at the time of award.

[65 FR 81007, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36368, July 22, 2009]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10299 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to prohibit Federal financial 

participation for gun violence prevention or intervention programs under 

the Medicaid program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Mr. CLYDE (for himself, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mrs. 

HARSHBARGER, Mr. BURLISON, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. 

MOONEY, Mr. OGLES, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. GOSAR, 

Mr. BIGGS, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. ROY, Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana, Mr. CRANE, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. GROTHMAN, 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. ESTES, Mr. BRECHEEN, Mr. 

OWENS, Mr. GRIFFITH, and Mr. KUSTOFF) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

Federal financial participation for gun violence prevention or intervention programs under the Medicaid program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicaid Funds Integ5 rity Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 10299 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING FEDERAL FINANCIAL PARTICIPATION 

2 FOR GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION OR INTER3 VENTION PROGRAMS UNDER THE MEDICAID 

4 PROGRAM. 

5 Section 1903(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1396b(i)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (26), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

8 end; 

9 (2) in paragraph (27), by striking the period 

10 and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

11 (3) by inserting after paragraph (27) the fol12 lowing new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(28) with respect to any amounts expended for 

14 gun violence prevention programs or gun violence 

15 intervention programs.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### 817.7004 Limitations.
#### 970.1504-1-11 Documentation.

The contracting officer shall tailor the documentation of the determination of fee prenegotiation objective based on 48 CFR 15.406-1, Prenegotiation objectives, and the determination of the negotiated fee in accordance with 48 CFR 15.406-3, Documenting the negotiation. The contracting officer shall include as part of the documentation: the rationale for the allocation of cost and the assignment of Facility/Task Categories; a discussion of the calculations described in 970.1504-1-5; and discussion of any other relevant provision of this subsection.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36372, July 22, 2009]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-21-00074-CR

Edwin LOZANO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 34900

Honorable Mark Cashion, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 7, 2021

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION 

Edwin Lozano was ticketed by a Department of Public Safety trooper for speeding on 

Interstate 35 in Medina County. Lozano was tried and found guilty of the misdemeanor offense by 

the Justice Court, Precinct 3 of Medina County, Texas. Lozano appealed the conviction to the 

County Court at Law of Medina County. After a trial de novo to the bench, the county court at law 

found Lozano guilty and imposed a fifty dollar fine. Lozano filed a notice seeking to appeal the 

judgment to this court. 
04-21-00074-CR

- 2 -

In criminal cases that have been appealed from a justice court to a county court at law, this 

court’s jurisdiction is limited to cases in which the fine imposed by the county court at law, 

exclusive of costs, exceeds one hundred dollars or “the sole issue is the constitutionality of the 

statute or ordinance on which the conviction is based.” TEX. CODE CRIM PROC. art. 4.03. See

Khozindar v. State, No. 02-14-00515-CR, 2015 WL 3422206, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth May 

28, 2015, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication); Hernandez v. State, No. 04-07-

00085-CR, 2008 WL 441783, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Feb. 20, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op., 

not designated for publication); Montpas v. State, 997 S.W.2d 650 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1999, no 

pet.).

After receiving and reviewing the clerk’s record, we ordered Lozano to file a response 

demonstrating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Lozano has filed a 

response in which he enumerates his complaints about the judgment: (1) “there was no probable 

cause for the vehicle stop” and Lozano not speeding; (2) the complaint should have been filed in 

the municipal court in Natalia, Texas, close to where the traffic stop occurred, not in the more 

distant justice court; and (3) the county court at law should not have rescheduled the trial when the 

state trooper did not appear at the first setting. Lozano does not assert a challenge to the 

constitutionality of the statute pursuant to which he was convicted.

Because the county court at law did not impose a fine exceeding one hundred dollars and 

because the sole issue to be appealed is not the constitutionality of the speeding statute, the 

judgment of the county court at law is final and this court does not have jurisdiction over the 

appeal. We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH