alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Soft Skills to Pay the Bills: Mastering Soft Skills for Workplace Success      

# Soft Skills to Pay the Bills: Mastering Soft Skills for Workplace Success

The Department of Labor’s Office of Disability Employment Policy released this collection of career development exercises that aim to improve the "soft skills" of young workers, including those with disabilities.

http://www.dol.gov/odep/topics/youth/softskills/
**Exhibit 32-9**
**Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code**
     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofExelon Generation Company, LLC for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, that (i) thereport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ExelonGeneration Company, LLC.     Date: July 26, 2005 /s/ J. Barry Mitchell         J. Barry Mitchell    Senior Vice President, Treasurer and    Chief Financial Officer  
18
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Filipe, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 94]

*540Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), rendered May 6, 2002, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the admission of testimony regarding his and the complainant’s membership in a gang, of which the defendant was the leader, is without merit. This evidence was relevant on the issue of the defendant’s motive, and was necessary background to explain the relationship between the defendant and the complainant *(see People v Newby,*291 AD2d 460 [2002]). Since the probative value of this testimony outweighed any prejudice to the defendant, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in admitting it *(id.; see also People v Carroll,*95 NY2d 375, 385 [2000]).

The defendant contends that the prosecutor’s references to this testimony during summation constituted reversible error. The defendant failed to preserve this argument for appellate review, as he failed to object during the prosecutor’s summation *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *see also People v Williams,*305 AD2d 703 [2003]). In any event, the challenged remarks either were fair comment on the evidence, permissive rhetorical comment, or responsive to the defense counsel’s summation *(see People v Hoover,*298 AD2d 599 [2002]; *see also People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396 [1981]; *People v Hines,*3 AD3d 580 [2004]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.
|Exhibit 32.2                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|The undersigned officer certifies that this Annual Report on Form 10-Q/A complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

|Date: | August 22, 2005                              
|----- | ---------------------------------------------
|      |                                              
|By:   | /s/ Thomas J. Cunningham                     
|      | Thomas J. Cunningham, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-3 Nos. 333-66269, 333-87038,
333-104954 and 333-110158 and S-8 Nos. 333-59164, 333-19465, 333-06771, 333-06765 and 333-88544) of
Cypress Bioscience, Inc. of our report dated February 13, 2004 with respect to the financial statements of Cypress Bioscience, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

|                                     |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|San Diego, California
March 23, 2004 |  |                      

---

QuickLinks
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FLORENCE A. WHITE EAGLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11-30352

D.C. No.

4:11-cr-00032-

SEH-1

ORDER

Filed November 12, 2013

Before: Kenneth F. Ripple*, M. Margaret McKeown,

and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed July 5, 2013, 721 F.3d 1108, is

amended as follows:

At page 15 of the slip opinion, line 1; 721 F.3d 1108,

1116, “on or around” shall be changed to “on or about”.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the

petition for panel rehearing. The full court has been advised

of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has

* The Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.
2 UNITED STATES V. WHITE EAGLE

requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. 

Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing

en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for en banc or

panel rehearing shall be permitted.
Exhibit 99.6

              Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18 United States Code
              -----------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of PECO Energy Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2002, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information
contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of PECO Energy Company.



Date:  October 31, 2002                     /s/ Frank F. Frankowski
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Frank F. Frankowski
                                            Vice President, Finance and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            PECO Energy Company
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1108 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2023 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to extend the 

authority of the Federal Communications Commission 

to grant a license or construction permit through a system of competitive bidding. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 1108 RDS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FCC AUCTION AUTHORITY. 

2 Section 309(j)(11) of the Communications Act of 

3 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)(11)) is amended by striking 

4 ‘‘March 9, 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘May 19, 2023’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 27, 

2023. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Thomas Alonzo, Jr., * From the 1 3 2nd District Court

of Scurry County

Trial Court No. 10487

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 7

- 00 303

- CR * October 24 , 2019

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J.,

Stretcher , J. , and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment )

( Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
#### 9901.308 Meetings.

The Board shall meet at the call of the Chairman. Agenda for Board meetings shall be proposed by the Chairman, but any Board member may request any item to be placed on the agenda.
§ 1.118 Appeal of initial adverse agency determination on correction or amendment. ( a ) Any individual whose request for correction or amendment under § 1.116 is denied, and who wishes to appeal that denial, shall address such appeal to the head of the agency which maintains the system of records to which the request relates, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the agency's initial denial of the request.
( b ) The head of each agency shall make a final determination with regard to an appeal submitted under paragraph (a) of this section not later than 30 days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) from the date on which the individual requests a review, unless, for good cause shown, the head of the agency extends this 30-day period and so notifies the requester, together with an estimate of the date on which a final determination will be made. Such extension should be utilized only in exceptional circumstances and should not normally exceed 30 days. The delegation of authority set forth in this paragraph may not be redelegated.
( c ) In conducting a review of an appeal submitted under paragraph (a) of this section, the head of an agency shall be guided by the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) and (5).
( d ) If the head of an agency determines to grant all or any portion of an appeal submitted under paragraph (a) of this section, the head of the agency shall inform the requester and the agency shall comply with the procedures set forth in § 1.117(d)(2) and (d)(3).
( e ) If the head of an agency determines in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section not to grant all or any portion of an appeal submitted under paragraph (a) of this section, the head of the agency shall inform the requester: ( 1 ) Of this determination and the reasons for the determination;
( 2 ) Of the requester's right to file a concise statement of the requester's reasons for disagreeing with the agency's decision;
( 3 ) Of the procedures for filing such a statement of disagreement;
( 4 ) That such statements of disagreements will be made available to anyone to whom the record is subsequently disclosed, together with (if the agency deems it appropriate) a brief statement by the agency summarizing its reasons for refusing to amend the record;
( 5 ) That prior recipients of the disputed record will be provided with a copy of the statement of disagreement, together with (if the agency deems it appropriate) a brief statement of the agency's reasons for refusing to amend the record, to the extent that an accounting of disclosures is maintained under 5 U.S.C. 552a(c); and
( 6 ) Of the requester's right to seek judicial review of the agency's determination in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(g). The agency shall insure that any statements of disagreement submitted by a requester are handled in accordance with paragraphs (e)(4) and (5) of this section.
[40 FR 39519, Aug. 28, 1975, as amended at 62 FR 33981, June 24, 1997]
EX-4.6


                                   EXHIBIT 4.6


                   CONVERTIBLE GRID NOTE CONVERSION AGREEMENT

      REFERENCE is hereby made to the outstanding  demand loans in the aggregate
amount  of Thirty  Two  Thousand  One  Hundred  Sixty  Three  Dollars  ($32,163)
represented by the annexed  Convertible  Grid Promissory Note dated December 31,
2005  (collectively,  the "Note") owed by Twin Lakes, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") to Turquoise Partners, LLC, a New York limited liability company
(the "Holder").

      WHEREAS,  the  Company  desires  to  convert  the Note into  shares of the
Company's  Common Stock to facilitate  corporate  transactions and financing and
the Holder has agreed to such conversion on the terms set forth herein.

      NOW  THEREFORE,  the  parties,  intending  to be legally  bound,  agree as
follows:

      1.    The Holder  hereby  agrees to waive any claims  relating to the Note
and agrees that all obligations of the Company  represented by the Note shall be
converted into [9,459,706] shares of the Company's Common Stock.

      2.    The Company agrees:

            (a)   that there is payable on the Note  (principal  plus  interest)
                  the total sum of $32,163; and

            (b)   the  Note  will be  converted  into  9,459,706  shares  of the
Company's  Common Stock in exchange  for full  settlement  of all the  Company's
obligations under the Note; and

            (c)   that the  certificates  representing  shares of the  Company's
Common Stock issued upon conversion of the Note shall have a restrictive legend.

      3.    Both  Holder and the  Company  represent  that this Note  Conversion
Agreement has been duly authorized and approved by all required corporate action
by the Company
<PAGE>


                  [SIGNATURE PAGE TO NOTE CONVERSION AGREEMENT]

and Holder and does not violate their respective organizational documents or any
agreements to which either of them is a party.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the Holder and the Company have made and entered into
this Note Conversion Agreement as of the date first set forth above.

Dated: January 9, 2006

                                                   TURQUOISE PARTNERS, LLC


                                                   By: /s/ Arnold P. Kling
                                                   Name: Arnold P. Kling
                                                   Title:   Managing Member

                                                   TWIN LAKES, INC.

                                                   By: /s/ Arnold P. Kling
                                                   Name: Arnold P. Kling
                                                   Title:   President
**Exhibit 32.a**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCinergy Corp., The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, PSI Energy, Inc. andThe Union Light, Heat and Power Company (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Rogers, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompanies.

 

 
| /s/ James E. Rogers     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| James E. Rogers         |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| May 7, 2004             |

 

----
§ 1.330 Location of hearing. ( a ) The hearing may be held— ( 1 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the respondent resides or transacts business;
( 2 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the claim or statement in issue was made; or
( 3 ) In such other place as may be agreed upon by the respondent and the ALJ.
( b ) Each party shall have the opportunity to present argument with respect to the location of the hearing.
( c ) The ALJ shall issue an order to the parties designating the time and the place of the hearing.
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Tom Walton/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 03/14/2011 07:48 PM 

Subject: Interagency comments on 2060-AP52 

Hi Bob, 

Attached you will find edits on the preamble, Chapter 1 of the RIA, and 

interagency comments on the A&N TSD. 

 

Reading through the response to interagency comments that was sent 

earlier this evening, it seems many of the comments went unaddressed. 

Could you please ensure that there are requests for comment in the 

preamble that call out the specific issues identified by the interagency 

reviewers? 

 

 

Please let me know if you have any questions or if we should set up time 

tomorrow to discuss the comments. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

________________________________________________ 

Cortney Higgins, PhD 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 345 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 345

      Designating August 3, 2018, as ``National Ernie Pyle Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 30, 2017

   Mr. Young (for himself and Mr. Donnelly) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Designating August 3, 2018, as ``National Ernie Pyle Day''.

Whereas Ernest ``Ernie'' Pyle was born on August 3, 1900, in Dana, Indiana;
Whereas Pyle studied journalism at Indiana University Bloomington before 
        becoming a reporter for The Daily Herald in La Porte, Indiana;
Whereas Pyle eventually became a roving correspondent for Scripps-Howard 
        newspapers, writing a column carried in approximately 200 newspapers;
Whereas Pyle served as a war correspondent in Britain in 1940 and covered the 
        Battle of Britain;
Whereas, following the entry of the United States into World War II in December 
        1941, Pyle covered every major American campaign in the European 
        theater, including in North Africa, Sicily, Italy, and France;
Whereas war reporting by Pyle during World War II consistently celebrated the 
        sacrifices, courage, and determination of the common soldier (commonly 
        known as a ``grunt'') of the United States;
Whereas Pyle lived and worked among the soldiers of the United States and shared 
        in the toils, endeavors, and challenges of those soldiers, including 
        facing enemy fire;
Whereas Pyle received the Pulitzer Prize in 1944 ``for distinguished war 
        correspondence during the year 1943''; and
Whereas Pyle, while traveling with soldiers of the United States that were 
        fighting on the Japanese island of Ie Shima during the Okinawa campaign, 
        was killed by Japanese machine gun fire on April 18, 1945: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates August 3, 2018, as ``National Ernie Pyle 
        Day'';
            (2) recognizes contributions made by Ernie Pyle to 
        journalism in the United States; and
            (3) celebrates the legacy of Ernie Pyle as one of the most 
        respected and beloved war correspondents in the history of the 
        United States.
                                 <all>
```