STATEOFARIZONASTATEIMPLEMENTATIONPLAN(SIP)REVISIONAPPENDIX4SIPCOMPLETENESSCHECKLISTSFORARTICLES6,7,AND8JULY15,1998STATEOFARIZONASIPREVISION-JULY15,1998ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rules: R18-2-601 thru 610. Emissions From Existing and

Nonpoint

Sources

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rules (Applicable SIP): R9-3-401 thru

410

3. Pollutants Regulatedby Rule:

PM: X

, SOx: , VOC:

, NOx: , CC:

, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Area sources.

Location

(city, county or statewide)

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Renumbered entire Article. No

change

in rule text.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Not quantifiable except on a

source

by source basis. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: Each

rule

requires use of work practices or equipment to minimize

emissions of smoke and fugitive dust.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: R18-2-402 through 409.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

161

# compliance (including frequency of inspection)

: See

compliance operating plan.

11. Special economic/technological

justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None.

12. Other comments: None. 162

# ARIZONA 

# DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY



# SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-701. Definitions. (Article 5. Existing Stationary

Source Performance Standards)

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): Most of these

definitions

were part of R9-3--lOl. Some are new.

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule: N/A

PM: , 

# SOx: , 

# VOC: , 

# NOx: , 

# CC: , 

# Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Definitions applicable to all

sources subject to Arizona existing stationary

source

performance standards. These include sources inside and

outside nonattainment

areas.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Definitions moved from general

definitions for all air pollution rules to the applicable

article 

# to improve

ease of use. Minor clarifications

were

made in some definitions.

. 

# Rule’s effect on emissions: N/A. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection:

N/A

8. Evidence that emissions limitations

are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: N/A

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting

requirements: N/A

10. Compliance/enforcement

strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection): N/A

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): N/A

12. Other comments: R18-2-701 (R18-2-701.1 thru 501.36) contains

definitions only, without emission limitations

or direct

163

# regulatory restrictions. As such, Questions 3,4,6,7,8,9,10,

and 11 are N/A. Applicable questions will be answered for

each definition using a checklist modified for definitions.

This checklist consists of Questions 1,2,5, and 12 from the

full completeness checklist. 164

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

MODIFIED SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS

DEFINITIONS: R18-2-701.1

- 

# R18-2-701.36

1. Rule: R18-2-701.1. “Acid mist”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-101.1

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Renumbered definition and

placed with appropriate article. Definition

now references

40 CFR 60, Appendix A, as well as the Arizona Testing Manual.

12. Other comments: None.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.2. “Architectural coating”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.11

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Renumbered definition and

placed with appropriate Article. Clarified text.

12. Other comments: None.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.3. “Asphalt concrete plant”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-101.14

and R9-3-508.A.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Expanded to include a complete

description of term by integrating part of R9-3-508 into the

definition, instead of merely referencing it.

12. Other comments: Placed definition in appropriate Article and

renumbered. 165

# 1. Rule: R18-2-701.4. “Black liquor”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP) : R9-3--lOl.22

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Text unchanged.

12. Other comments: Placed definition in appropriate Article and

renumbered. 166V1. Rule: R18-2-701.5. “Calcine”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.25

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Clarified: changed definition

from

the solids produced by a “ roaster 11 to the solids produced

by a “lime plant.”

12. Other comments: Placed definition in appropriate Article and

renumbered.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.6 “Concentrate”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.40

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: “Copper” removed as modifier in

title

because term is only applicable to primary copper

smelters.

2. Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed in the

appropriate Article.

1. Rule: Rl8-2-701.7 “Concentrate dryer”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.41

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: “Copper” removed as modifier in

title

because term is only applicable to primary copper

smelters.

12. Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed in

appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701 .8 “Concentrate roaster”

167

# 2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.42

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: “Copper modifier removed from

title because term is only applicable to primary

copper

smelters.

12. Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed with

appropriate Article. 168

# 1. Rule: Rl8-2-701.9 “Condensate stripper system”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lOl.36

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered. Definition placed in appropriate

Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.lO “Control device”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lO1.39

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered. Definition placed in appropriate

Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.11 “Converter”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.43

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Modifier “copper” removed from

title because term is only applicable to primary

copper

smelters.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and moved to appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.12 “Facility”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9—3-1Ol.64

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered. Definition placed in appropriate

169OLI---1•9IDT1JVH

# 1. Rule: R18-2-701.13 “Fugitive dust”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1Ol.70

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered. Definition placed in appropriate

Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.14 “High sulfur oil”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): None, new

definition.V



# 5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: These characteristics for fuel

oil were referenced in several rules, prompting development of

this definition, by implication. Specifications identical to

Applicable SIP.

12. Other comments: Added as needed clarification of rules.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.15 “Lime kiln”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.8

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered. Definition placed in appropriate

Article.

1. Rule: Rl8-2-70l.16 “Low sulfur oil”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-503.C.2.g.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Defined

asfuel 

# oil with less

171than0.90percentbyweightofsulfur.12.Othercomments:PlacedinappropriateArticle.172

# 1. Rule: R18-2-701.17 “Matte 1 ’

2. EPA 

# Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3--lO1.44

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Modifier “copper” removed from

title because term is only applicable to primary

copper

smelters.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.18 “Miscellaneous metal parts and products”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lOl.98

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Improved wording;

no change in

content.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: Rl8-2-701.19 “Multiple-effect evaporator system”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lOl.97

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: The parenthetical “(black



# liquor)”

was considered unnecessary and was removed from

definition. Other minor changes to comform with Attorney

General standards for rules.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: Rl8-2-701.20 “Neutral sulfite semichemical pulping”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lOl.102

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

173

# improve clarity.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

174

# 1. Rule: R18—2-701.21 “Petroleum liquids”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1Ol.116

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: ASTM references updated.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.22 “Process source”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.125

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor rewording to improve

clarity.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18—2-701.23 “Process weight”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.126

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.24 “Process weight rate”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.127

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Primary change was to move the

portion of the definition that described how the rate is

established into R18-2-702.E.,

as a general standard under

this article. This portion of the Applicable SIP rule is not

a

definition and thus needed to be moved to a rule to conform

with Atorney General standards for rules.

17512..Othercomments:RemainingdefinitionrenumberedandplacedinappropriateArticle.176

# 1. Rule: R18-2-701.25 Recovery furnace”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lO1.131

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Simplified by deleting

definitions of several subtypes of recovery furnaces. The

examples provided in the Applicable SIP rule were considered

unecessary because standards applicable to recovery furnaces

are the same regardless of age or construction.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.26 “Reid vapor pressure”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9—3--1O1.134

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Only change: updated ASTM

reference.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-70l.27 “Reverberatory smelting furnace”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1Ol.45

5. Summary of RulejRule changes: Modifier “copper” removed from

title because term is only applicable to primary copper

smelters.

12. Other comments: Rule renumbered and placed in appropriate

Article.

1. Rule: Rl8—2-70l.28 “Rotary lime kiln”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lOl.l36

177

# 5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Definition renumbered without

change, and moved to appropriate article.

12. other comments: None. 178

# 1. Rule: R18-2-701.29 “Slag”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-lO1.143

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve clarity.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.30 “Smelt dissolving tank”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.144

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and moved to appropriate article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.31 “Smelter feed”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1.145

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Definition renumbered and

placed in appropriate article; minor wording changes to

improve clarity.

12. Other comments: None.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.32 “Smelting”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1O1,46

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Word “copper” removed from

title because term is only applicable to primary copper

smelters. 17912.Othercomments:Definitionrenumberedandplacedinappropriatearticle.180

# 1. Rule: R18—2-701.33 “Smelting furnace”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-1Ol.47

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Word “copper” removed from

title

because term is only applicable to primary copper

smelters.

12. Other comments: Renumbered and placed in appropriate Article.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.34 “Standard conditions”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3--lOl.154

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed with

appropriate rules.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.35 “Supplementary control system”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP) : R9-3-1O1.152

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12. Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed with

appropriate rules.

1. Rule: R18-2-701.36 “Vapor pressure”

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): P.9-3-101.159

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No change in text.

12.. Other comments: Definition renumbered and placed with

appropriate rules. 1818t--[rIJEriIEEDARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-702. General provisions

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-501

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , SOx:

, VOC:

, NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

Paragraph E., which describes how process weight rate is to be

used

in compliance determinations,

may apply to other

pollutants.

4. Identification of Sources: Existing sources.

Location

(city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under

control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Renumbered, and revised as

follows:

Paragraph A. added to limit applicability to

existing sources. Paragraphs B. and C. (former A. and B.)

revised for clarity and proper referencing of test methods.

Former

paragraph C., which provided for alternative opacity

standards, deleted and replaced with new paragraph D. New

paragraph

D. provides for more explicit procedures for the

development and approval of alternative opacity limits;

including public notice and comment. Former paragraph D.

deleted as obsolete. Finally, new paragraph E. includes

portions of the Applicable SIP definition “process weight

rate” (R9-3-lO1.131)

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: None. Alternative opacity limits

are not permitted unless a demonstration is made that the

facility

will be able to meet applicable emission limits. No

SIP

credits claimed. 183

# 7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: See

number 6, above.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: N/A

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: N/A

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection)

: See

compliance operating plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known. Alternative

opacity limits are only permitted for non-NSPS sources.

12. Other comments: Alternative opacity limits provision is

approved and in Applicable SIP.

184

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT 

# OF ENVIRONMENTAL 

# QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2--702. General provisions

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , 

# SOx:

, 

# VOC:

, 

# NOx: , 

# CC: , 

# Pb:____

Paragraph E., which describes how process weight rate is to be

used

in compliance determinations,

may apply to other

pollutants.

3. Identification of Sources: Existing sources.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. See completeness checklist.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of

the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM;

Lbs/hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? N/A.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? Method 9.

185

# 11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? See

Method 9.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See

paragraph ID.

13. Are records required to be kept? N/A

14. What records are required determine compliance? N/A

is. 

# In what form or unite must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept?

N/A.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied,

who makes determination): N/A.

186ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-703. Standards of performance for fossil-fuel

fired steam generators and general fuel burning equipment

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-503

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , 50x: X

, VOC:

, NOx: X

, CO: , Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS sources.

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, for coal

fired

plants only.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Renumbered. Provision allowing

averaging of total heat input of all units for determining the

allowable emissions of a plant (former paragraph C.)

eliminated as obsolete. Applicability provision from deleted

paragraph included in subparagraph A.2.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Emission limitations included in

paragraph C. through I.. No SIP credits claimed for rule.

7. NA1QS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection:

Emission limitations set independent of ambient

concentrations. However, operations that cause violations of

NAAQS

prohibited (e.g. see paragraph H.)

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: Rule

provides emission limitations only and do not reqire

application of specific technologies, controls or reformulated

materials. 187

# 9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See paragraphs C.

through I.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection)

: See

compliance operating plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 188

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-703. Standards of performance for existing fossil-fuel

fired steam generators and general fuel burning equipment

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X

, 

# SOx: X

, 

# VOC:

, 

# NOX: X , 

# CC: , 

# Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS sources.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Opacity and Lbs/hr for PM;

Lbs/million Btu for SOx; Lbs/3Hrs for NOx.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? Same as required for NSPS

sources.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? See

189

# paragraphs C. through I., and number 6, above.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See

paragraph C. through I.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required to determine compliance? See

Arizona Testing Manual, Section 1. Also, see R18-2-313.C.1.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept?

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied,

who makes determination): See R18-2-314.

190

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-704. Standards of performance for incinerators

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-504.

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X

, 

# SOx:

, 

# VOC:

, 

# NOx: , 

# CC: , 

# Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non—NSPS incinerators.

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Numerous wording changes to

improve clarity. Emissions standard for air curtain

destructors deleted because methods are not available to

monitor mass emissions from this type of source. Provision

for variances for compliance test methods deleted.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Emission limitations provided for

in paragraph B. No SIP credits claimed for this rule.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific requirements other than emission limitations and test

methods.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: Emission limitations-



# 191paragraph B.; test methods- paragraph F.; work practice

standards- paragraph C.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection)

: See

compliance

operating plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from

EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 192ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-704. Standards of performance for incinerators

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X

, SOx:

, VOC:

, NOx: , CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS incinerators.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. Yes, see paragraph D.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any 

# type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of

the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity; Lbs/hr.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A

10. What test method is required? Method 9; see paragraph F.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? As

required

under 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendix A test methods,

except as provided in paragraph D.

193

# 12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See 11,

above.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? Daily

charging rates and hours of operation (see paragraph E.).

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? Written daily records, as required in permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R8-2-314.

194

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-705. Standards of performance for existing

portland cement plants

2. EPA Analogous Apprpved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-505

3. Pollutants Regulated by.Rule:

PM: X , 

# SOx: X

, 

# VOC:

, 

# NOx: , 

# CC:

, 

# Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Cement Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve

clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule s effect on emissions: Sets PM and SOx limits, as a

function

of feed rate. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission

Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.:

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: Paragraphs B., C., D.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection)

: See

Compliance

Operating Plan. 19511.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:None.196

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rl8-2-705. Standards of performance for existing portland

cement plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X , 

# SOx: X

, 

# VOC:

, 

# NOx: , 

# CC: , 

# Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Cement Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? For PM, percent opacity and

Lbs PM/ton process weight. For SOx, Lbs/ton of feed.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A

10. What test method is required? See paragraph F.; Method 9 for

opacity.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method?

197Hourly.12.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?InaccordancewithEPAreferencemethods.13.,Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.19814. What records are required determine compliance? Daily

charging rates and hours of operation.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? Daily, written, format identified in permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination) : See R18-2-314.

199

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT O ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-706. Standards of performance for existing nitric

acid

plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-506

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , 

# SOx: , 

# VOC:

, 

# NOx: X , 

# CC:

, 

# Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Nitric acid plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under

control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve

clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Sets NOx rate as a function of

production rate. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc. : No

specifc

controls required by rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See paragraph A. 2., and

B. 20010. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection)

: See

•

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from

EPA policies 

# (as appropriate) : None known.

12. Other comments: None. 201ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-706. Standards of performance for existing nitric acid

plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , SOx:

, VOC:

, NOx: X

, CC: , Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Nitric Acid Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a)

state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of

the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity Kg

NOx/metric ton production rate.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? See paragraph C. and 0.;

Method 9 for opacity.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? As

required by applicable methods. 20212. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is

the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See

paragraph 0.3.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

20314. What records are required determine compliance? CEM records

per R18-2-313

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? See R18-2-313.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.

204ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-707. Standards of performance for existing

sulfuric acid plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-507

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM:, SOx: X, VOC:, NOx:_____, CC:, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Sulfuric Acid Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under

control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Minor wording changes to

improve

clarity and remove redundancies.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits SOx and acid mist

emissions. No SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific control requirement in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: Paragraph A.

20510. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None.

12. Other comments: None. 206ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-707. Standards of performance for existing sulfuric acid

plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM:, SOx: X, VOC:, NOx:, CC:, Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Sulfuric Acid Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Kg SOx/Metric ton acid

produced; Kg acid mist/Metric ton acid produced.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.:‘

10. What test method is required? See paragraph ID.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? As

required by applicable methods. 20712.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?SeeparagraphD.3.and13.4.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?InaccordancewithR18-2-313.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?SeeR18-2-313.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination)SeeR18-2-314.---208ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONNENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULESl.Rule:R18-2-708.Standardsofperformanceforexistingasphaltconcreteplants2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5083.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CO:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSAsphaltConcretePlants.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Minorwordingchangestoimproveclarityandremoveredundancies.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:LimitsPMemissionsasafunctionofprocessweightrate.NoSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:Nospecifictechnologyrequirementsinruleexceptforprohibitiononuseofhighsulfurfuel.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeparagraphB.20910.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):None.12.Othercomments:None.210ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-708.Standardsofperformanceforexistingasphaltconcreteplants2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSAsphaltConcretePlants.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?No.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?PercentopacityforPM;Lbs/Hr.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeparagraphG.11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?InaccordancewithapplicableEPAReferenceMethods.21112.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?SeeparagraphG.2.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?Asrequiredbypermit.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?Asrequiredbypermit.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):SeeR18-2-314212ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-709.Standardsofperformanceforexistingpetroleumrefineries2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5093.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:X,VOC:X,NOx:,CC:X,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSPetroleumRefineries.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Minorwordingchangestoimproveclarityandremoveredundancies.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:LimitsVOCandSOxemissionsinaccordancewithdesignandworkpracticestandardsandtomeetPSDrequirements.NoSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:SeeparagraphG.2.andG.3.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:SeeparagraphsC.throughG.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeparagraphsC.throughG.10.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodetermine213compliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:SubjectsallrefineriestoNSPS(SubpartJ)withtheexceptionofCEMrequirementsforrefineriesof7,000barrelsperdayorless.Y21411.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecomplianc.etestmethod?InaccordancewithapplicableEPAReferenceMethods.12.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?SeeNSPS.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecàrdsarerequireddeterminecompliance?AsrequiredbyNSPS.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?AsrequiredbyNSPS.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):SeeR18-2-314.216ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-710.Standardsofperformanceforexistingstoragevesselsforpetroleumliquids2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5103.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:,SOx:,VOC:X,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSStorageVesselsforPetroleumLiquids.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Minorwordingchangestoimproveclarityandremoveredundancies.GasolinevolitilitytestingandcontrolrepealedbecauseofcomprehensivefuelsregulationprogramundertheauspicesoftheArizonaDepartmentofWeightsandMeasuresadopted1979.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:LimitsVOCemissionsinaccordancewithdesignandworkpracticestandards.NoSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:SeeparagraphsA.throughD.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeparagraphE.21710.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:Liquidfuelruleswillbehandledinaseparatesubmittal.218ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FORRULES1.R18-2-710.Standardsofperformanceforexistingstoragevesselsforpetroleumliquids2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:

PM:, SOx:, VOC: X, NOx:, CO:, Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Storage Vessels for

Petroleum Liquids.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? No emission limits, all

standards are design and work practice based.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? American Petroleum Institute

Bulletin 2517, ammended as of February 1980.

21911.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?N/A.12.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?No.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?SeeparagraphE.2.is.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?SeeparagraphE.2.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):None.220ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-711.Standardsofperformanceforexistingsecondaryleadsmelters2.EPAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5113.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:X4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSSecondaryLeadSmelters.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Minorwordingchangestoimproveclarityandremoveredundancies.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:Setslimitsonparticulateemissionsoflead.NoSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:Nospecifictechnologyrequirementsinrule.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeparagraphA.22110.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):NosuchfacilitiesinArizonaatthistime.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):None.12.Othercomments:None.D222ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-711.Standardsofperformanceforexistingsecondaryleadsmelters2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:X3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSSecondaryLeadSmelters.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?No.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?PercentopacityforPM;Lbs/Hr.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeparagraphE.11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?InaccordancewithapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.22312.Istherearequiredcomp1incecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?InaccordancewithMethod5.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?Inaccordancewithpermitrequirements.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?Inaccordancewithpermitrequirements.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination)SeeR18-2-314.224ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIROIMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-712.Standardsofperformanceforexistingsecondarybrassandbronzeingotproductionplants2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5123.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,50x:,VOC:,NOx:,CD:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSSecondaryBrassandBronzeIngotProductionPlants.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Minorwordingchangestoimproveclarityandremoveredundancies.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:Setslimitsonparticulateemissions.NoSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:Nospecifictechnologyrequirementscontainedinrule.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,-averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeR18-2-712.22510.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):None..12.Othercomments:None.-=—226ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-712.Standardsofperformanceforexistingsecondarybrassandbronzeingotproductionplants2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSBrassandBronzeIngotProductionPlants.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambient•standard?No.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?PercentopacityforPM;Lbs/Hr.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeparagraphE.11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?As227requiredinapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.12.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?AsrequiredinapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?Inaccordancewithpermitrequirements.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?Inaccordancewithpermitrequirements.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):SeeRl8-2-314.228ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-713.Standardsofperformanceforexistingironandsteelplants2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5133.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CD:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSIronandSteelPlants.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Minorwordingchangestoimproveclarityandremoveredundancies.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:Setslimitsonparticulateemissions.NoSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:Nospecifictechnologyrequirementscontainedinrule.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeR18-2-713.22910.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:None.230ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-713.Standardsofperformanceforexistingironandsteelplants2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CD:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSIronandSteelPlants.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No..5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?No.E.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?ForPM,Opacity;seeparagraphA.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeparagraphF.11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?AsrequiredinapplicableEPAreferencemethod.23112.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?AsrequiredinapplicableEPAreferencemethod.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Asrequiredinpermit.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?Asrequiredinpermit.15..Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?Asrequiredinpermit.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):SeeR18-2-314.232ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-714.Standardsofperformanceforexistingsewagetreatmentplants2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5143.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSSewageTreatmentPlants.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Minorwordingchangestoimproveclarityandremoveredundancies.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:Limitsparticulateemissions.NoSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:SeeparagraphB.Nootherspecifictechnnologyrequirementsinrule.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeR18-2-714.23310.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:None.2341-ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.Rl8-2-714.Standardsofperformanceforexistingsewagetreatmentplants2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSSewageTreatmentPlants.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?No.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?PercentopacityforPM;Lbs/Hr.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeparagraphC.11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?ForopacityseeparagraphA.l.,forotherpurposesinaccordance235withapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.12.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?InaccordancewithapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.23614.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?Asrequiredinpermit15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?Asrequiredinpermit.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):SeeR18-2-314.237ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-715.XXStandardsofperformanceforexistingprimarycoppersmelters(includesthreerules)2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5153.’PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:X,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:AllPrimaryCopperSmelters.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Rulereformattedandrevisedtoimproveclarity.Obsoleteprovisionsrepealed.G.Rule’seffectonemissions:Limitsparticulateemissionsbasedonprocessweightrate.LimitsonSOxemissionssettoprovideforattainmentofSO2NAAQS.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:SeeR18-2-715.F.andR18-2-715.02.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:Rulecontainsperformancestandards.Notechnologybasedrequirementsinrule.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:Emissionlimitationsandaveragingtimes-seeR18-2-715.AforPM,R18-2-715.F.for238SO2;testprocedures-seeRl8-2-715.E,R18-2-715.01.K.;forrecordkeeping-seeR18-2-715.01.P.10.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:Coppersmelterrulewasbrokendownintothreemajorsections:R18-2-715containsemissionlimitationsandrequiredtestprocedures;R18-2-715.01containscompliancedeterminationcalculationsandmethods,monitoringandrecordkeepingrequirements;andR18-2-715.02containsrequirementsfordeterminingambientairqualityimpactsoffugitiveSO2emissionsandproceduresfordevelopingfugitiveemissionlimitsifnecessary.239ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-715.XX.Standardsofperformanceforexistingprimarycoppersmelters(includesthreerules)2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:X,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:AllPrimaryCopperSmelters;somespecificrequirementssetonsource-by-sourcebasis.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?No.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?ForPMLbs/Tonofprocessweight;forSO2Lbs/Hr.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?January14,1986unlessotherwisespecifiedinadelayedcomplianceorderorconsentdecree.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?***December31,1986.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeRlB-2-715.D.,E.,andR18-2-515.01.K.24011.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?ForPMasrequiredinapplicableEPAReferenceMethods;forSO2hourlyandannual.12.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?SeeR18-2-715.F(forSO2),forPMinaccordancewithapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?SeeR18-2-515.P.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?SeeRl8-2-715.P.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):SeeR18-2-314;R18-2-515.Ol.N.,R18-2-7l5.O1.T241ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-716.Standardsofperformanceforexistingcoalpreparationplants2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5163.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSCoalPreparationPlants.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Minorwordingchangestoimproveclarityandremoveredundancies.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:Limitsparticulateemissions.NoSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc..:Notechnologyrequirementscontainedinrule.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeR18-2-716.24210.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyoeinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:None.--—243ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-716.Standardsofperformanceforexistingcoalpreparationplants2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSCoalPreparationPlants.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?No.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?PercentopacityforPM;Lbs/Hr.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?.Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeR18-2-716.F.11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAreferencemethods.24412.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAreferencemethods.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?Asrequiredbypermit.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?Asrequiredbypermit.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):SeeR1S-2-314.245ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-717.Standardsofperformanceforsteelplants:existingelectricarcfurnaces(EAF)2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5173.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSSteelPlantswithElectricArcFurnaces.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Eliminatedredundancyandclarifiedrulelanguage.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:Limitsparticulateemissions,noSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NIAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:Notechnologyrequirementscontainedinrule.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeR18-2-717.24610.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:None.--247ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-717.Standardsofperformanceforsteelplants:existingelectricarcfurnaces(EAF)2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSSteelPlantswithElectricArcFurnaces.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?Yes,seeR18-2-717.C.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?Percentopacity,Lbs/Hr.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No..8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeparagraphF.;Method9foropacity..11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?See248paragraphDforopacity;otherwiseasrequiredbyapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.12.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?Asrequiredbypermit.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)•musttherecordsbekept?Asrequiredbypermit.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):SeeR18-2-314.249ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-718.Standardsofperformanceforexistingkraftpulpmills2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5183.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CO:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSKraftPulpMills.Location(ci.ty,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Eliminatedredundancyandclarifiedrulelanguage.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:LimitsPMandH2Semissions,noSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:Notechnologyrequirementscontainedinrule.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeR18-2-718.25010.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection)SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):NoneKnown.12.Othercomments:None.:251ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-718.Standardsofperformanceforexistingkraftpulpmills2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSKraftPulpMills.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?No.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?ForPM;opacityandLbs/Hr.ForH2S;ppm.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeparagraphsF.andG.11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?ForPMasrequiredinapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.ForH2S;—252continous.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required in applicable EPA Reference Methods.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

25314. What records are required determine compliance? As required

in permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? As required in permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination) See Rl8-2-314.

254ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:Rl8-2-719.Standardsofperformanceforexistingstationaryrotatingmachinery2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5l93.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:X,VOC:,NOx:,CO:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSStationaryturbines,internalcombustionandcompressionfiredengines.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Eliminatedredundancyandclarifiedrulelanguage.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:LimitsPMandSO2emissions,noSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:NospecifictechnologyrequirementsforPM;lowsulfuroilrequiredwithsomeexceptions(seeparagraphsG.andH.)9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeR18-2-71925510. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

complianoe (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): No known.

12. Other comments: None. 256ARIZONADEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-719. Standards of performance for existing stationary

rotating machinery

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X, SOx: X, VOC:, NOx:, CC:, Pb:____

3. Identification ofSources: Non-NSPS Stationary turbines,

internal combustion and compression fired engines.

4.Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. Conditional allowance for use

of

high sulfur oil, see paragraphs G. and H.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Opacity for PM; Lbs/hr; for

SO 2 Lbs/million BTU.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979:

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? See paragraph K.

257



# 1-11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAreferencemethod.12.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAreferencemethod.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?SeeparagraphsI.andJ.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?SeeapragraphsI.andJ.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):R18-2-314.258ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-720. Standards of performance for existing lime

manufacturing plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-520

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X, SOx:, VOC:, NOx:, CC:, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS lime manufacturing

plants. Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM, no SIP credits

claimed.

7. NAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See R18-2-720.

25910.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:None.260ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-720.Standardsofperformanceforexistinglimemanufacturingplants2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSlimemanufacturingplants.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure..No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?No.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?OpacityforPM;Lbs/hr.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeparagraphsF.throughH.11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.26112.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?Asrequiredbypermit.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?Asrequiredbypermit.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):SeeR18-2-314.262ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-721.Standardsofperformanceforexistingnonferrousmetalsindustrysources2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5213.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:X,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSnonferrousmetalsmines,mills,concentrators,crushers,screens,materialshandlingfacilities,fineorestoreage,dryers,roasters,andloaders.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.S.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Eliminatedredundancyandclarifiedrulelanguage.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:LimitsPM;reducedsulfurandsulfuroxideemissions,noSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:Nospecifictechnologyrequirementsinrule.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeR18-2-721.26310, Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 264ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONNENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-721.Standardsofperformanceforexistingnonferrousmetalsindustrysources2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:X,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSnonferrousmetalsmines,mills,concentrators,crushers,screens,materialshandlingfacilities,fineorestoreage,dryers,roasters,andloaders.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?.Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?No.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?OpacityforPM;Lbs/hr.Sulfurcompounds10percentofSulfurenteringprocessasfeed.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeparagraphH.26511.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.12.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?SeeparagraphF.andasrequiredbypermit.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?Asrequiredbypermit.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):SeeR18-2-314.266ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-722. Standards of performance for existing gravel

or crushed stone processing plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3--522

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X, SOx:, VOC:, NOx:, CC:, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Rock Products Processing

Plants. Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Emissions limitations for PM, no

SIP

crdits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: Spray

bars, nozzles, or similar wet suppression systems required,

see paragraph ID.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See R].8-2-722.

26710.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:None.268ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-722.Standardsofperformanceforexistinggravelorcrushedstoneprocessingplants2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CO:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSRockProductsProcessingPlants.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?No.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?OpacityforPM;Lbs/hr.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?SeeparagraphH.11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.26912.istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?SeeparagraphsF.andG.15.inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?Asrequiredbypermit.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):SeeR18-2-314.270ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-723.Standardsofperformanceforexistingconcretebatchplants2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5233.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSConcreteBatchPlants.Location(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Eliminatedredundancyandclarifiedrulelanguage.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:Limitsopacityoftheemissions(PM),noSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:SeeR18-2-404throughR18-2-407.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeR18-2-404throughR18-2-407.27110.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.11.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:None.272ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPENFORCEABILITYANALYSISFORRULES1.R18-2-723.Standardsofperformanceforexistingconcretebatchplants2.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:____3.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSConcreteBatchPlants.4.Areanyexemptionsallowed?Ifso,whatcriteriaareused?Specifycalculationprocedure.No.5.Isbubblingoraveragingofanytypeallowed?Ifyes,(a)statecriteria;(b)isaveragingtimedifferentfromthatoftheambientstandard?No.6.Whataretheunitsofcompliance?PercentopacityforPM;Lbs/hr.7.Ifanareaisredesignated,willthischangetheemissionlimitations?Ifyes,whichonesandhow?No.8.Whatisthecompliancedate?May14,1979.9.Whatistheattainmentdate?N/A.10.Whattestmethodisrequired?EPAreferencemethod9.11.Whatistheaveragingtimeinthecompliancetestmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.27312.Istherearequiredcompliancecalculationorevaluation?Whatistheperiodofcomplianceand/orevaluationmethod?AsrequiredbyapplicableEPAReferenceMethod.13.Arerecordsrequiredtobekept?Yes.14.Whatrecordsarerequireddeterminecompliance?Asrequiredbypermit.15.Inwhatformorunitsmusttherecordsbekept?Onwhattimebasis(hourly,daily,etc.)musttherecordsbekept?Asrequiredbypermit.16.Malfunctionprovisions(whatexceedancesmaybeexcused,howapplied,whomakesdetermination):N/A.274ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:Rl8-2-724.Standardsofperformanceforfossil-fuelfiredindustrialandcommercialequipment2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-5243.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:X,VOC:,NOx:,CC:,Pb:4.IdentificationofSources:Non-NSPSFossil-FuelFiredIndustrialandCommercialEquipmentLocation(city,countyorstatewide):Statewide,exceptareasundercontrolbyCountieswithapprovedairpollutioncontrolprograms.5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Eliminatedredundancyandclarifiedrulelanguage.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:LimitsPMandSO2emissions,noSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PS]JincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:Nospecifictechnologyrequirementsinrule.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:SeeR18-2-724.27510. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection): See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other commonts: None. 276ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. R18-2-724. Standards of performance for fossil-fuel fired

industrial and commercial equipment

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X, SOx: X, VOC:, NOx:, CO:, Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Fossil-Fuel Fired

Industrial and Commercial Equipment.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a)

state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Opacity for PM; Lbs/hr.

For SO 2 Lbs/million BTU.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? See paragraph K.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? As

277required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is

the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes; see paragraph G.2. and

as

required by permit.

14. What records are required determine compliance? See paragraph

G.2. and as required by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.

278ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-725. Standards of performance for existing dry

cleaning plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-525

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , SOx:

, VOC: X

, NOx: , CC:

, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non—NSPS Dry Cleaning Plants

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under

control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits VOC emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.V

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See

paragraph C.• Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See Rl8-2-725.

27910. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 280ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-725. Standards of performance for existing dry

cleaning plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM:, SOx:, VOC: X, NOx:, CC:, Pb:

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Dry Cleaning Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure.No.

S. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a)

state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent total hydrocarbon

emissions.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? N/A.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method?

N/A. 28112. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? No.

13. Are records required to be kept? Yes.

14. What records are required determine compliance? In accordance

with permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? In accordance with permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination)

: See R18-2-314.

282ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-726. Standards of performance for sandblasting

operations

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-526

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule: None.

PM: X, SOx:, ‘ICC;, NOx:, CO:, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Sandblasting Operations.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under

control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Controls dust, no SIP credits

claimed.

7. NAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See R18-2-726.

28310. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection): See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 284ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-726. Standards of performance for sandblasting

operations

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule: None.

PM: X, SOx:, VOC:, NOx:, CC:, Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Sandblasting Operations.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? N/A.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? N/A.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method?

N/A. 28512. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? N/A.

13. Are records required to be kept? N/A.

14. What records are required determine compliance?N/A.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? N/A.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): N/A.

286ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-727. Standards of performance for spray painting

operations

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-527 and

R19-3-1Ol

.122

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , SOx:

, VOC: X , NOx: , CC:

, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Spray Painting Operations

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, except areas

under

control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits VOC emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule. Sets performance

and formulation standards.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

record.keeping/reporting requirements: See R18-2-727.

28710. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 288ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: Rl8-2-727. Standards of performance for spray painting

operations

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM:, SOx:, VOC: X, NOx:, CC:, Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Spray Painting Operations.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

S. What are the units of compliance? Percent VOC/Volume, percent

overspray capture, no SIP credits claimed

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? N/A.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method?

N/A.



# ]--— 28912. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? N/A.

13. Are records required to be kept? N/A.

14. What records are required to determine compliance? N/A.

1. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? N/A.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): N/A.

290ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-728. Standards of performance for existing

ammonium sulfide manufacturing plants

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-528

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X, SOx:, VOC:, NOx:, CC:, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Ammonium Sulfide

Manufacturing Plants.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM and H 2 S emissions, no

SIP

credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See :?

paragraph E.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See R18-2-728.V 29110. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None, Known.

12. Other comments: None. 292ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-728. Standards of performance for existing

ammonium sulfide manufacturing plants

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X, SOx:, VOC:, NOx:, CO:, Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Ammonium Sulfide

Manufacturing Plants.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a)

state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.V

S. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM;

Lbs/hr. Ppm for H 2 S.V

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.V

8. What is the compliance date? May 14,1979. 4:,

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? See paragraph G.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? As

293required by applicable EPA Reference Method. Also, see

paragraph

D. for H 2 S.

12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? As required by permit.

14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): See R18-2-314.



# ] 294ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-729. Standards of performance for cotton gins

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-529

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X, SOx:, VOC:, NOx:, CO:, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources; Non-NSPS Cotton Gins.

Location (city, county or statewide) : Statewide, except areas

under

control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See

R18-2-404 through R18-2-407.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See RlB-2-729.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

295compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 296

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABILITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: Rl8-2-729. Standards of performance for cotton gins

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X

, 

# SOx:

, 

# VOC: , 

# NOx: , 

# CC: , 

# Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Cotton Gins.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? Percent opacity for PM, no

SIP credits claimed.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? September 22, 1983.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? See pararaph ID.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

297

# 12. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? As

required by applicable EPA Reference Method.

13. Are records required to be kept? As required by permit.

14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): N/A. :

298

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-730. Standards of performance for unclassified

sources

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-502

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X

, 

# SOx: X

, 

# VOC: X

, 

# NOx: X , 

# CC: , 

# Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: All Unclassified non-NSPS Sources.

Location (city, county or statewide): Statewide, except areas

under control by Counties with approved air pollution control

programs.

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: No substantive changes; moved

to

end of article for clarity and ease of use.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM, SO 2

, VOC, and NO 2

emissions,

no SIP credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations

are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: See

paragraph G.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See R18-2-730.

29910. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection): See

Compliance

Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

•

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 300

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP ENFORCEABflITY ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-730. Standards of performance for unclassified

sources

2. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X

, 

# SOx: X

, 

# VOC: X , 

# NOx: X , 

# CC:

, 

# Pb:____

3. Identification of Sources: All Unclassified Sources.

4. Are any exemptions allowed? If so, what criteria are used?

Specify

calculation procedure. No.

5. Is bubbling or averaging of any type allowed? If yes,

(a) state criteria; (b) is averaging time different from that

of

the ambient standard? No.

6. What are the units of compliance? See paragraph A.

7. If an area is redesignated, will this change the emission

limitations? If yes, which ones and how? No.

8. What is the compliance date? May 14, 1979.

9. What is the attainment date? N/A.

10. What test method is required? N/A.

11. What is the averaging time in the compliance test method?

N/A. 30112. Is there a required compliance calculation or evaluation? What

is the period of compliance and/or evaluation method? See

paragraph A.

13. Are records required to be kept? As required by permit.

14. What records are required determine compliance? As required

by permit.

15. In what form or units must the records be kept?

On what time basis (hourly, daily, etc.) must the records be

kept? As required by permit.

16. Malfunction provisions (what exceedances may be excused, how

applied, who makes determination): N/A.

302ARIZONADEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTALQUALITYSIPCOMPLETENESSANALYSISFORRULES1.Rule:R18-2-80l.Classificationofmobilesources2.EPAAnalogousApprovedRule(ApplicableSIP):R9-3-6013.PollutantsRegulatedbyRule:PM:X,SOx:,VOC:,NOx:,CO:,Pb:____4.IdentificationofSources:MobileSources.Location(city,countyorstatewide):5.SummaryofRule/Rulechanges:Eliminatedredundancyandclarifiedrulelanguage.6.Rule’seffectonemissions:LimitsPMemissions,noSIPcreditsclaimed.7.NAAQS/PSDincrementsandRFPdemonstration/protection:N/A.8.EvidencethatemissionslimitationsarebasedonContinuousEmissionReductionTechnology,add-oncontrols,reformulatedmaterials,industrial/processequipmentdesigns,etc.:Nospecifictechnologyrequirementsinrule.9.Rulesectioncontainingemissionlimitations,workpracticestandards,averagingtimes,testproceduresand/orrecordkeeping/reportingrequirements:N/A.10.Compliance/enforcementstrategiestobeusedtodeterminecompliance(includingfrequencyofinspection):SeeComplianceOperatingPlan.303

# 11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 304ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMEI’rAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-802. Off-road machinery

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-602

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X, SOx:, VOC:, NOx:, CC:, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Off-road Machinery.

Location (city, county or statewide):

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

S. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice :

standards,

averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See paragraph A.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : See

Compliance Operating Plan. 30511.Specialeconomic/technologicaljustificatjofordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):Noneknown.12.Othercomments:None.3063”—

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: Rl8-2-803. Heater-planer units

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-603

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X, 

# SOx:, 

# VOC:, 

# NOx:, 

# CC:_____, 

# Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Heater-planer Units.

Location

(city, county or statewide):

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified

rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions, no SIP

credits

claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific

technology requirements in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See R18-2-603.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection) : 

# See

Compliance

Operating Plan. 30711. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 308ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: Rl8-2--804. Roadway and site cleaning machinery

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-604

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X, SOx:, VOC:, NOx:, CC:, Pb,:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Roadway and Site Cleaning

Machinery. Location (city, county or statewide)

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction’ Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See paragraph B.’

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection): See ompliance

309Operating Plan.

11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None. 310ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP COMPLETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. Rule: R18-2-805. Asphalt or tar kettles

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-605

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: X

, SOx:

, VOC: , NOx: , CC:

, Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources: Non-NSPS Asphalt of Tar Kettles.

Location (city, county or statewide):

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Eliminated redundancy and

clarified rule language.

S. Rule’s effect on emissions: Limits PM emissions, no SIP

credits claimed.

7. NA1QS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: No

specific technology requirements in rule.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: See paragraph B.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection): See

Compliance Operating Plan. 311

# 11. Special economic/technological justifications for deviations

from

EPA policies (as appropriate): None known.

12. Other comments: None.



# I I I, 312



# I—

# ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

SIP coMpr. 1 ETENESS ANALYSIS FOR RULES

1. No new rule.

2. EPA Analogous Approved Rule (Applicable SIP): R9-3-701 thru

709

(Article 7) Nonferrous smelter orders.

3. Pollutants Regulated by Rule:

PM: , 

# SOx:

, 

# VOC: , 

# NOx: , 

# CO:

, 

# Pb:____

4. Identification of Sources:

Location (city, county or statewide):

5. Summary of Rule/Rule changes: Rule deleted, obsolete.

6. Rule’s effect on emissions: N/A.

7. NAAQS/PSD increments and RFP demonstration/protection: N/A.

8. Evidence that emissions limitations are based on Continuous

Emission

Reduction Technology, add-on controls, reformulated

materials, industrial/process equipment designs, etc.: N/A.

9. Rule section containing emission limitations, work practice

standards, averaging times, test procedures and/or

recordkeeping/reporting requirements: N/A.

10. Compliance/enforcement strategies to be used to determine

compliance (including frequency of inspection): N/A.

31311.Specialeconomic/tecologicaljustificationsfordeviationsfromEPApolicies(asappropriate):N/A.12.Othercomments:None.314