11924 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 38 / Monday, March 1, 2021 / Notices 

4See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

5 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties 

should specify that they are requesting a review of 

entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to 

the extent possible, include the names of such 

exporters in their request. 

6See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

7See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 41363 (July 

10, 2020). 

1See Mattresses from the People’s Republic of 

China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review, 85 FR 46069 (July 31, 2020). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Intent to Rescind the 2020 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of 

Mattresses from the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

issued concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

3 Id. 

reviews.4 Accordingly, the NME entity 

will not be under review unless 

Commerce specifically receives a 

request for, or self-initiates, a review of 

the NME entity.5 In administrative 

reviews of antidumping duty orders on 

merchandise from NME countries where 

a review of the NME entity has not been 

initiated, but where an individual 

exporter for which a review was 

initiated does not qualify for a separate 

rate, Commerce will issue a final 

decision indicating that the company in 

question is part of the NME entity. 

However, in that situation, because no 

review of the NME entity was 

conducted, the NME entity’s entries 

were not subject to the review and the 

rate for the NME entity is not subject to 

change as a result of that review 

(although the rate for the individual 

exporter may change as a function of the 

finding that the exporter is part of the 

NME entity). Following initiation of an 

antidumping administrative review 

when there is no review requested of the 

NME entity, Commerce will instruct 

CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters 

not named in the initiation notice, 

including those that were suspended at 

the NME entity rate. 

All requests must be filed 

electronically in Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS) on 

Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS 

website at https://access.trade.gov.6

Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request 

must be served on the petitioner and 

each exporter or producer specified in 

the request. Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.7

Commerce will publish in the Federal 

Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation of 

Administrative Review of Antidumping 

or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, 

or Suspended Investigation’’ for 

requests received by the last day of 

March 2021. If Commerce does not 

receive, by the last day of March 2021, 

a request for review of entries covered 

by an order, finding, or suspended 

investigation listed in this notice and for 

the period identified above, Commerce 

will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

or countervailing duties on those entries 

at a rate equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: February 18, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–04133 Filed 2–26–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–092] 

Mattresses From the People’s Republic 

of China: Preliminary Intent To 

Rescind the 2020 Antidumping Duty 

New Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that 

Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co., Ltd. 

(Sunbeauty) did not make a bona fide 

sale during the period of review (POR). 

Therefore, we preliminarily determine 

to rescind this new shipper review 

(NSR). 

DATES: Applicable March 1, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jesse Montoya, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8211. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 31, 2020, Commerce 

published a notice of initiation of a new 

shipper review of the antidumping duty 

order on mattresses from the People’s 

Republic of China (China).1 Commerce 

subsequently issued an antidumping 

duty questionnaire, and supplemental 

questionnaires, to Sunbeauty and 

received timely responses. For 

additional background, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.2

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

are all types of youth and adult 

mattresses from China. The products 

subject to the order are currently 

properly classifiable under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule for the United States 

(HTSUS) subheadings: 9404.21.0010, 

9404.21.0013, 9404.29.1005, 

9404.29.1013, 9404.29.9085, and 

9404.29.9087. Products subject to this 

order may also enter under HTSUS 

subheadings: 9404.21.0095, 

9404.29.1095, 9404.29.9095, 

9401.40.0000, and 9401.90.5081. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise subject to this order is 

dispositive. For a complete description 

of the scope of the order, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 75l(a)(2)(B) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), and 19 CFR 351.214. For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A 

list of sections in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is attached in 

the appendix to this notice. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision 

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 38 / Monday, March 1, 2021 / Notices 11925 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘2020 Antidumping Duty 

New Shipper Review of Mattresses from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Bona Fide 

Sales Analysis for Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co., 

Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Bona 

Fide Sales Analysis Memorandum). 

5The POR for this NSR is June 4, 2019, through 

May 31, 2020. 

6See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

7See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1); see also Temporary 

Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due 

to COVID–19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 

41363 (July 10, 2020) (Temporary Rule). 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

9 Id. 

10See 19 CFR 351.303. 

11See Temporary Rule. 

12See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011). 

Memorandum and the electronic 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Preliminary Intent To Rescind the 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review 

As discussed in the Bona Fide Sales 

Analysis Memorandum,4 Commerce 

preliminarily finds Sunbeauty did not 

make a bona fide sale during the POR.5

Commerce reached this conclusion 

based on the totality of the 

circumstances, including, among other 

things, the sale price and quantity. 

Because Sunbeauty did not make any 

bona fide sales during the POR, we 

preliminarily determine to rescind this 

review.6 Because the factual information 

used in our bona fides analysis of 

Sunbeauty’s sale involves business 

proprietary information, a full 

discussion of our analysis is in the 

proprietary Bona Fide Sales Analysis 

Memorandum. 

Public Comment 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on the preliminary results of 

this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(ii), interested parties may 

submit case briefs no later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 

raised in the case briefs, may be filed no 

later than seven days after the time limit 

for filing case briefs.7 Parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this proceeding are requested to submit 

with each brief: (1) A statement of the 

issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of authorities.8

Executive summaries should be limited 

to five pages total, including footnotes.9

All submissions, with limited 

exceptions, must be filed electronically 

using ACCESS.10 Electronically filed 

comments must be received successfully 

in its entirety by Commerce’s electronic 

records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. 

Eastern Time on the due date. Note that 

Commerce has temporarily modified 

certain of its requirements for serving 

documents containing business 

proprietary information, until further 

notice.11

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), any 

interested party may request a hearing 

within 30 days of the publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. If a 

hearing is requested, Commerce will 

notify interested parties of the hearing 

date and time to be determined. 

Interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain: (1) The party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of hearing participants; and (3) 

a list of the issues to be discussed in the 

hearing. Issues raised in the hearing will 

be limited to those raised in the 

respective case and rebuttal briefs. 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this review, which will 

include the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in any briefs and rebuttal 

briefs received, no later than 90 days 

after the date these preliminary results 

of review are issued, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

If Commerce issues a final rescission 

of this review, it intends to instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

liquidate the relevant entry at the Chinawide rate. 

If Commerce does not proceed to a 

final rescission of this NSR, pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.202(b)(1), it will calculate 

an importer-specific assessment rate 

based on the final results of this review. 

However, pursuant to Commerce’s 

refinement to its assessment practice in 

non-market economy cases, for entries 

that were not reported in the U.S. sales 

database submitted by Sunbeauty, 

Commerce intends to instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the China-wide 

rate.12

Cash Deposit Requirements 

If Commerce proceeds to a final 

rescission of this review, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

China-wide rate for Sunbeauty because 

Commerce will not have determined an 

individual weighted-average dumping 

margin for Sunbeauty. If Commerce 

determines an individual weightedaverage dumping margin for Sunbeauty, 

it intends to instruct CBP to collect cash 

deposits, effective upon the publication 

of the final results of review, equal to 

the calculated weighted-average 

dumping margin. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 18, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Issues Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2021–04175 Filed 2–26–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Advance Notification of 

Sunset Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

Background 

Every five years, pursuant to the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

and the International Trade Commission 

automatically initiate and conduct 

reviews to determine whether 

revocation of a countervailing or 

antidumping duty order or termination 

of an investigation suspended under 

section 704 or 734 of the Act would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping or a 

countervailable subsidy (as the case may 

be) and of material injury.