alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Media Systems Co. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, AJ Vesak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 21st day of August, 2006.

BY:
/s/ AJ VESAK                        Alexander Vesak, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**
#### Donald S. McWilliams et al., defendants in error, v. Theodore W. May et al., plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 34,508.

Opinion filed May 13, 1931.

Sumner C. Palmer, for plaintiffs in error.

Thomas G. Vent, for defendants in error.

Mr. Justice Hebei

delivered the opinion of the court.
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2005 of Graham Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to material affect,
the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 -1-




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal controls over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/William C. Johnson
 -2-
###### **Exhibit 10.7**

 

 

August 6, 2002

 

# **Private & Confidential**

 

Mr. Gene Mullinnix

 

Re:          Employment with HPL

 

Dear Gene:

 

The Board of Directors of HPL Technologies, Inc. has approved thefollowing modifications to your employment arrangement:

 

4.               *Title, Reporting Duties and Responsibilities*.  Effective July 19, 2002, you title will beSenior Vice President, Operations.  Youwill report directly to the CEO.  In theabsence of a CEO, you will report directly into the Board of Directors.

5.               *Salary and Bonus*.  Your monthly salary will increase from$12,500.00 to $19,166.67 ($230,000 on an annual basis).   You will also receive an automaticguaranteed bonus of $100,000 payable 50% on January 18, 2003 and 50% on July18,2003.  In the event that a CorporateTransaction (as defined in Section 10.2(a) of the Company’s 2001 EquityIncentive Plan (the “Plan”)) occurs, you will be entitled to the immediatepayment of the balance of any unpaid guaranteed bonus.

6.               *Corporate Transaction*.  In the event of a Corporate Transaction (asdefined in Section 10.2(a) of the Plan) occurs and the acquiring or successorcompany does not offer you a comparable employment position, you shall beentitled to a severance payment of 50% of your annual salary.

 

All other terms and conditions of your employment letter dated February8, 2001 remain in effect.

 

Sincerely,

 
| /s/ Elie Antoun                        |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Elie Antoun                            |   |
| Chairman of the Board of Directors and |
| Interim Chief Executive Officer        |

 

----
**Exhibit 32-3****Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code**     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofExelon Corporation for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, that (i) the reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exelon Corporation.        Date:  October 26, 2005 /s/ J. Barry Mitchell   J. Barry Mitchell   Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-94,405-01

EX PARTE RYAN ALAN STUENKEL, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 007-0859-17-A IN THE 7TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM SMITH COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual assault of a child under 14 years old and

sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in

the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 11.07. 

On Nov. 1, 2022, the trial court entered an order designating issues. The district clerk

properly forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

73.4(b)(5). However, the application was forwarded before the trial court obtained defense counsel’s

affidavit and made findings of fact and conclusions of law. We remand this application to the trial

court to complete its evidentiary investigation and make findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: January 11, 2023

Do not publish
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Parent Partner Program Navigator      

# Resource: Parent Partner Program Navigator

This webpage shares guidance on how to design, implement, and enhance a parent partner program as a strategy for engaging families through peer mentoring and support. The Navigator supports child welfare administrators, staff, and family leaders through essential steps of planning and implementing successful parent partner programs and provides tips on applying these four domains of program development: 
                  -  Assessing needs, readiness, and capacity  
                  -  Program design  
                  -  Program management  
                  -  Engagement and partnerships  

**Learn more.**
(January 8, 1980)

#### Williams Real Estate Co., Inc., Respondent, v Douglas A. Edwards Incorporated et al., Appellants.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 26, 1978, which, *inter alia,*denied defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, modified, on the law, with costs and disbursements, to reverse and grant summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 10, 1978, denying defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint, dismissed, as academic, without costs or disbursements. The documentary evidence in this record discloses that on December 13, 1977, defendant Douglas Edwards explicitly conditioned plaintiff’s right to a broker’s commission upon the execution of the cobrokerage agreement proffered by Douglas Edwards and the execution of a lease approved by Douglas Edwards’ principal, Standard Brands or its subsidiary, Julius Wile Sons & Co., Inc. The latter condition was confirmed by Standard Brands’ letter of transmittal, dated December 19, 1977, forwarding the sublease, a copy of which letter was sent to plaintiff. The record is clear that plaintiff proposed various amendments and thus never agreed to execute Douglas Edwards’ cobrokerage agreement in the form requested. Likewise, Douglas Edwards never agreed to plaintiff’s modifications. Moreover, the parties for whom each of the brokers were negotiating never entered into a lease. No triable issues exist and summary judgment should have been granted. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Birns, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.

Kupferman, J.,

dissents in a memorandum as follows: I dissent and would affirm. As the court at Special Term pointed out, a licensed real estate *861broker need not have its compensation agreement in writing (General Obligations Law, § 5-701, subd a, par 10). The plaintiff-respondent had a customer, and by correspondence from and on behalf of the defendants, such customer was acknowledged. Whether there was ever a meeting of the minds, or whether the conditions postulated by the defendants were met, is a matter that should be resolved at a trial.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: 8 Tips for College Women’s Health and Safety      

# Resource: 8 Tips for College Women’s Health and Safety

This webpage provides tips for college women on maintaining mental and physical health and safety. **Learn more.**
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Dupree, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 15, 1977, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Case remitted to the Family Court for further proceedings in accordance herewith. The appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. This case stems from the alleged stabbing of the complainant on June 12, 1974 by her husband, the defendant. Although the defendant was originally indicted in 1974 for attempted murder, assault in the first degree, and felonious possession of a weapon, that indictment was dismissed, on motion of the District Attorney. At the same time, an application was made by the District Attorney to transfer the matter to the Family Court on the ground that it had exclusive jurisdiction over this case. This motion was likewise granted. However, correspondence between an Assistant District Attorney and a clerk of the Family Court indicates that the matter was referred back to the Criminal Term of the Supreme Court on June 18, 1975. Thereafter, the defendant was reindicted for the same crimes charged in the original indictment. In our opinion the record is not clear as to whether the defendant or his attorney (if he had one) was given notice of the impending transfer of the matter back to the Criminal Term. Notice to defendant was required since he had the right to challenge the Family Court transfer order either by motion (see Family Ct Act, former § 816, subd [b]), or directly by appeal (see Family Ct Act, § 1112; *People v Bell,*41 AD2d 583). The determination of whether a matter should be transferred is critically important to a defendant and should not be made when he is without counsel *(People v Hopkins,*49 AD2d 682, 683). Accordingly, in the interest of justice this matter should be remitted to the Family Court to hear and report on whether defendant received notice of the Family Court action and whether such action was taken either when defendant was without counsel or without the knowledge of counsel (see *People v Hopkins, supra,*p 683). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32-1** **Certificate    Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of    Title 18 United States Code**     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the quarterly    report on    Form 10-Q    of Exelon Corporation for the quarterly period ended    September 30, 2006, that (i) the report fully complies    with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information    contained in the report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of    Exelon Corporation. /s/  John    W. Rowe    John W. Rowe    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President     Date: October 27, 2006
##### 



Exhibit 31-8
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    RULE 13a-14(a)
    AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
    AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  I,
    John F. Young, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on
    Form 10-Q
    of PECO Energy Company;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e))
    for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and  (c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants second fiscal quarter that has materially
    affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
    registrants internal control over financial
    reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have
    disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
    control over financial reporting, to the registrants
    auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and  (b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  
       177
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 117 

To prohibit any entity that receives Federal funds from the COVID relief 

packages from mandating employees receive a COVID–19 vaccine, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committee on 

Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit any entity that receives Federal funds from 

the COVID relief packages from mandating employees 

receive a COVID–19 vaccine, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COVID RELIEF PACKAGE FUNDING RESTRIC4 TION. 

5 (a) FUNDING RESTRICTION.—Any entity that re6 ceives Federal funds from a COVID relief package may 

7 not mandate that any employee of such entity receives a 

8 COVID–19 vaccine. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 117 IH

1 (b) RETURN OF FUNDS.—Any entity that is in viola2 tion of subsection (a) shall return any funds received from 

3 the COVID relief package to the Federal Government. 

4 (c) COVID RELIEF PACKAGE DEFINED.—In this 

5 section, the term ‘‘COVID relief package’’ means any of 

6 the following: 

7 (1) CARES Act (Public Law 116–136). 

8 (2) Coronavirus Preparedness and Response 

9 Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020 (Public Law 

10 116–123). 

11 (3) Families First Coronavirus Response Act 

12 (Public Law 116–127). 

13 (4) Paycheck Protection Program and Health 

14 Care Enhancement Act (Public Law 116–139). 

15 (5) Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 

16 (Public Law 116–260). 

17 (6) American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public 

18 Law 117–2). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB