alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Alexander P. Obolensky, Petitioner, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review a determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated April 21, 1978, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing the complaint on the ground that it was not filed within the statutorily prescribed period. Petitioner was employed as an assistant professor by respondent State University of New York when, on March 29, 1973, he was given notice that he would not be reappointed. Following said notification petitioner appealed from the decision to deny his reappointment. He failed to succeed on his appeal. On August 27, 1975 petitioner filed a discrimination complaint with the State Division of Human Rights. The complaint was dismissed based on a finding that it was not filed within one year after the alleged unlawful discriminatory practice as required by subdivision 5 of section 297 of the Executive Law. Petitioner thereafter commenced this proceeding. The act of giving petitioner notice that he would not be reappointed started the running of the limitation period and such limitation was not tolled by the procedures utilized’ by respondents following petitioner’s appeal of the decision to deny his reappointment *(Matter of Queensborough Community Coll, of City Univ. of N. Y. v State Human Rights Appeal Bd.,*41 NY2d 926). Consequently, petitioner did not file within the prescribed time period. It is argued by petitioner, however, that respondents waived the defense of the statutory time limitation by failing to raise the time limitation as a defense. We disagree. Where a cause of action is created by a statute and a time limitation is attached to its commencement, the time is an ingredient of the cause and the time limit need not be asserted by way of defense *(Romano v Romano,*19 NY2d 444, 447). In the present case, the time limitation prescribed in subdivision 5 of section 297 of the Executive Law is not a matter of defense and, unless the proceeding was brought within one year, petitioner has no cause of action *(State Div. of Human Rights v University of Rochester,*53 AD2d 1020). Accordingly, petitioner’s complaint was properly dismissed and the board’s determination must be confirmed. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>             3,784,265
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                   0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                  793,785
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                516,720
<OTHER-ASSETS>                          165,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        5,260,446
<COMMON>                                762,136
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>               562,881
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                     378,404
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>        1,703,421
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                              20,496
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                  1,206,089
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                      272,659
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                     0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                 0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                     0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                   0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>        2,057,781
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>         5,260,446
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>               706,571
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                     34,772
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              593,156
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              627,928
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                  78,643
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                          962
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>           79,605
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 23,724
<NET-INCOME>                             55,881
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 212
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>            55,669
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                107,200
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                 8,083
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                  242,680
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.00


</TABLE>
,,,.



## . '

To: Abel Acosta From: Ricardo Cavazos #1358886 Clerk of the T.C.C.A.

Dear sir, I had sent to this Honorable Court a request for status and standing as well as a·docl<et sheet showing every itern that hes been received by this Court in conection with the.V'ilrits of Habeas Corpus 11.07 that I have now got filed and pending in the cases numbered asWR-75,914-05, WR-75,914- 06,**~·ffi.-75,914-07,** WR-75,914-08. I am making this request at the behest ofmy writwriter, Mr. Damon Earl Lewis, \vho handled my first Writs of Habeas Corpus 11.07 seeking an out-oftime appeaL tvhich was granted on March 28, 2012, I regreat to inforin this Court that my previous ::::-equest**~-ras** mista.l<enly_ansuered improperly, I was given information on the .writsthat I hadfiled concerning the out-of-time appeal when I vlas making my request on the new ·

### vrrits of habeas corpus 11.07 with the cause numbers shown above. · The writs that I am·requesting information on has had an order for findings of fact and ·conclusions of lawand if necessary a hearing**b~** held1 placed on them by this ·court, however, there seemed to be some k:j.nd of confusion as to which judge was to handle thts case, the prosecutors office filed a preposed findings of fact and conclusion of law'and I have filed a rebuttal to their**filings·~** ·I have since received from this Court a notice, via white card, showing that· on July 10,2014 the supplemental clerk's record, in response to the order issued by this Court, has been received and presented to the Court

.

.I would first raise a complaint to this Court that I was not provided a copy of the order to forward the clerk's record, nor was· I informed of •·1ha.t was included in this supplemental clerk's record, >vhich is very improper. Since I have been deprived of this information, 

### my writvriter, 

### rtr. Lewis, is ·concerned tha.t the ·Court has received the entire record, which should have included the rebuttal to the states preposed finding of fact and conclusion of law as \vell as the.two motions**req.u~st~ng** a subpoena for the entire District AttorneyRecords andra subpoena for**th.~)10tes** of the assistant District Attorney that handled this case. · _ I hUY.lbly request that I be provided with the status a:r'fd standing of these writs of habeas cqrpus 11.07 and a docl<et sheetshowing everydocuwent that has been received by this Court concerning these writs. TriANK YOU. Date: June

## ftl__,2015 SINCERELY RICARDO CAVAZOS il358886

· ..**~**

..:.:

/



## .RECEIVEDIN CC)URTOF

### CRt~n/N 

### •

.. .·.·•' A.LAPPEALS 

## JUN 

# 112015
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-2407
WILBERT HATCHER FREELAND, Individually; CHRISTINE EVADNEY FREELAND, Individually; MASSIEKA HOLNESS, Individually, daughter of Christine E. Freeland and stepdaughter of Wilbert H. Freeland; DEJOURNE FREELAND, a minor by Wilbert Hatcher Freeland, Christine Evadney Freeland, her father and mother; MONICA FFRENCH, Individually, mother of Christine E. Freeland, grandmother of Massieka H. Holness and Dejourne Freeland, mother in law of Wilbert H. Freeland, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus FRANCIS B. CHILDRESS, Trooper First Class, Individually and as a State Police, Bureau of Drug and Criminal Enforcement, Westminster Barracks, Defendant - Appellee, and
MARYLAND STATE POLICE; OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL; SUPERINTENDENT, of the Maryland State Police, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-99-3552-WMN)2 Submitted: March 20, 2002 Decided: April 8, 2002 Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilbert Hatcher Freeland, Christine Evadney Freeland, Massieka Holness, Dejourne Freeland, Monica Ffrench, Appellants Pro Se. Mark Holdsworth Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Freeland v. Childress , No. CA-99-3552-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           School Bus Safety      

# School Bus Safety

Information and resources regarding school bus safety.

http://www.nhtsa.gov/School-Buses
#### § 1005.19 Commercial food processing establishment.

See § 1000.19.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Secure Our World      

# Resource: Secure Our World

This webpage contains videos, tips, and resources for parents, families, and professionals about staying safe online.**Learn more.**
#### § 1124.43 General classification rules.

See § 1000.43.
CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Zhiyong Xu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of China Finance, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of China Finance, Inc.

         I, Liang Liao, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of China Finance, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of China Finance, Inc.

Dated: March 28, 2005

By:  /s/ Zhiyong Xu
    -------------------
    Zhiyong Xu
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

By:   /s/ Liang Liao
    -------------------
    Liang Liao
    Chief Financial Officer
#### Napoleon HARTSFIELD, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; Charlie Hourihan, Appellees.

No. 06-2724.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 5, 2007.

Filed: Nov. 8, 2007.

Napoleon Hartsfield, Anamosa, IA, pro se.

*621Kristin Wright Ensign, Attorney General’s Office, Des Moines, IA, for Appellees.

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Napoleon Hartsfield appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment to the remaining defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following this court’s remand for further proceedings on a retaliation claim. We conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. The judgment is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
§ 1.630 What will OALJ do with a case referral? Within 5 days after the effective date stated in the referral notice under § 1.626(c)(4), 43 CFR 45.26(c)(4), or 50 CFR 221.26(c)(4): ( a ) The Hearing Clerk must: ( 1 ) Docket the case;
( 2 ) Assign an ALJ to preside over the hearing process and issue a decision; and
( 3 ) Issue a docketing notice that informs the parties of the docket number and the ALJ assigned to the case; and
( b ) The ALJ must issue a notice setting the time, place, and method for conducting an initial prehearing conference under § 1.640. This notice may be combined with the docketing notice under paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
#### MAY et al., Respondents, v. WRIGHT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 10, 1906.)

Action by Charles H. May and others against Mary J. Wright.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Crime, Violence, Discipline, and Safety in U.S. Public Schools: Findings from the School Survey on Crime and Safety: 2021-22      

# Resource: Crime, Violence, Discipline, and Safety in U.S. Public Schools: Findings from the School Survey on Crime and Safety: 2021-22

This report (PDF, 94 pages) presents findings from the 2021–22 School Survey on Crime and Safety data collection. The report examines a range of issues dealing with school crime and safety, including the frequency of school crime and violence, disciplinary actions, the presence and activities of school security staff, and school practices related to maintaining a safe school environment. **Learn more.**
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Affordable Care Act Offers Behavioral Health Services to AI/AN Communities      

# Affordable Care Act Offers Behavioral Health Services to AI/AN Communities

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) improves access to health coverage, including coverage for mental health or substance abuse treatment, for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities. This article outlines the benefits of the ACA for AI/AN communities, how to get more information, and how to enroll. 

http://blog.samhsa.gov/2015/01/29/affordable-care-act-offers-behavorial-health-services-to-aian-communities/?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7238 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DON BENNY ANDERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 06-7433 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DON BENNY ANDERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris and

Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judges. (1:83-cr-00159-AVB)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 8, 2006
- 2 -

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Don Benny Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Don Benny Anderson appeals

the district court’s orders denying his motions filed under Fed. R.

Crim. P. 35(a) (applicable to offenses committed before November 1,

1987). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of relief.

United States v. Anderson, No. 1:83-cr-00159-AVB (E.D. Va. June 28,

2006; August 2, 2006). We deny Anderson’s motion for preparation

of a transcript at government expense, deny as moot his motion to

expedite, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED