alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 926.7004 Size standard for Energy Policy Act procurements.

The size standard for Energy Policy Act engineering services procurements (SIC 8711) shall be the size standard specified for military and aerospace equipment and military weapons.
915.404-2-70 Audit as an aid in proposal analysis. ( a ) When a contract price will be based on cost or pricing data submitted by the offerors, the DOE contracting officer or authorized representative shall request a review by the cognizant Federal audit activity prior to the negotiation of any contract or modification including modifications under advertised contracts in excess of— ( 1 ) The threshold stated at 48 CFR 15.403-4(a)(1) for a firm fixed-price contract or a fixed-price contract with economic price adjustment provisions; or adjustment provisions; or
( 2 ) Twice the threshold at 48 CFR 15.403-4(a)(1) for requiring cost or pricing data for all other contract types, including initial prices, estimated costs of cost-reimbursement contracts, interim and final price redeterminations, and target and settlement of incentive contracts.
( b ) The requirement for auditor reviews of proposals which exceed the thresholds specified in paragraph (a) of this section may be waived at a level above the contracting officer when the reasonableness of the negotiated contract price can be determined from information already available. The contract file shall be documented to reflect the reason for any such waiver, provided, however, that independent Government estimates of cost or price shall not be used as the sole justification for any such waiver.
[63 FR 56851, Oct. 23, 1998, as amended at 74 FR 36363, July 22, 2009; 76 FR 7692, Feb. 11, 2011]
----

----

|   Cleco                  Power LLC                                    |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION                  PURSUANT TO                                      |
| 18                  U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                        |
| AS                  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                         |
| SECTION                  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF                  2002 |

| (1)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                  material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |

| /s/                  Michael H. Madison                                                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Michael                  H. Madison                    Chief Executive Officer |

| /s/                  Kathleen F. Nolen                                                                                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Kathleen                  F. Nolen                    Senior Vice President and                     Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
#### Edgar L. Sullivan et al., Petitioners, v State Division of Human Rights, on the Complaint of Howard Gainsburg, Respondent.

— Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board dated October 25, 1978, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights dated June 6, 1977, which found that petitioners had committed an unlawful discriminatory practice. Petition granted, order annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the complaint charging an unlawful discriminatory practice is dismissed. There is no evidence to support the determination that the refusal of the Sullivans (the contract vendors) to modify the executed contract of sale to increase the time for the contract vendees to obtain a mortgage commitment was "because of the race, creed, color [or] national origin” (Executive Law, § 296, subd 5, par [a], cl [1]) of one of the two contract vendees, or because the vendees were a "mixed couple”. Moreover, the respondent State Division of Human Rights was in error in finding that *947petitioner Eckhardt, the attorney for the Sullivans, “aided and abetted the aforesaid discriminatory acts” of the Sullivans merely because he conveyed to the attorney for the contract vendees the refusal of his clients to modify the contract of sale (see *Hahn v Wylie,*54 AD2d 629; *Gifford v Harley,*62 AD2d 5). Damiani, J. P., Titone, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### § 1.800 Words in the singular form.

Words in this subpart in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the context may require.
#### GREENE, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Respondent.

(Su*1136preme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 21, 1906.)

Action by Arthur

M. Greene against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event, upon the ground' that the question of defendant’s negligence should have been submitted to the jury.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith A. HALLIBURTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-3985.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted May 16,2008.*

Decided May 22, 2008.

Amended June 10, 2008.

Rehearing Denied July 8, 2008.

Timothy A. Bass, Office of the United States Attorney, Springfield, IL, Linda L. Mullen, Office of the United States Attorney, Rock Island, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Keith A. Halliburton, Forrest City, AR, pro se.

Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

*

 This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).

Order

Approximately eight years after we affirmed his conviction and sentence on direct appeal, Keith Halliburton filed in the district court a motion asking the judge to compel the United States Attorney to file a motion for sentence reduction under Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b). The district judge denied *551this motion summarily, and Halliburton has appealed.

The motion is untimely. Rule 35(b)(1) allows the United States to propose a lower sentence only within the first year after a sentence has been imposed. There is an exception, see Rule 35(b)(2), for information that the defendant did not learn (or whose value could not be assessed) until the year had passed. Halliburton does not contend that his situation fits this exception. Instead he maintains that the United States promised to file a motion and did not carry through. Any shortcoming on that subject could have been raised long ago.

What is more, *Wade v. United States,*504 U.S. 181, 112 S.Ct. 1840, 118 L.Ed.2d 524 (1992), holds that a district court does not have authority to upset the prosecutor’s decision not to file a Rule 35(b) motion unless the defendant first makes a prima facie showing that the prosecutor acted for an unconstitutional reason. See also *In re United States,*503 F.3d 638 (7th Cir.2007). Halliburton has not tried to show this. Instead he believes that the prosecutor must provide the district judge with a good reason *not*to file a motion. That contention is incompatible with *Wade.*

Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [RTID 0648-XA844]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation of SEDAR 80 Life History Topical Working Group Webinar I for U.S. Caribbean Queen Triggerfish.

# SUMMARY:

                        The SEDAR 80 stock assessment of U.S. Caribbean queen triggerfish will consist of a series of data webinars. See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        .                    

# DATES:

The SEDAR 80 Life History Topical Working Group Webinar I was scheduled for March 10, 2021.

# ADDRESSES:

*Meeting address:*                         The meeting was to be held via webinar.                    

*SEDAR address:*                         4055 Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, North Charleston, SC 29405.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Julie A. Neer, SEDAR Coordinator; (843) 571-4366; Email:                         *Julie.neer@safmc.net*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting notice published on February 3, 2021 (86 FR 8003). This notice announces that the meeting is cancelled.

                        (Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*)                    

Dated: February 19, 2021.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2021-03856 Filed 2-24-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Young AAPI Leaders Convene for the Fifth White House AAPI Youth Forum      

# Young AAPI Leaders Convene for the Fifth White House AAPI Youth Forum

AAPI, OPE, and the East Coast Asian American Student Union hosted the fifth White House AAPI Youth Forum and launched the second year of the Initiative’s E3! Ambassadors youth engagement program. The Youth Forum brought together more than 150 young AAPI leaders and advocates working within the federal government and in the community to discuss issues important to AAPI youth.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/07/16/young-aapi-leaders-convene-fifth-white-house-aapi-youth-forum?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=events-recent
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Resource: SAMHSA’s Data Archive

This website features SAMHSA data collections, maps, reports, public use data files, analysis tools, and other information related to data. Users can browse by topic or publication type and request data based on a specific need. 

http://www.samhsa.gov/data/?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resources
#### GRAINSKY, Appellant, v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

March, 1906.)

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District. Action by Louisa Grainsky against the Interborough Rapid Transit Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed. Hamburg & Frank, for appellant. Charles A. Gardiner (G. Tarleton Goldthwaite, of counsel), for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The recent cases of Busch v. Interborough Railroad (decided by the Appellate Division, First Department. January 26, 1906) 96 N. Y. Supp. 747, and Rein v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad, 47 Misc. Rep. 675, 94 N. Y. Supp. 636, are decisive of the question presented upon this appeal and require a reversal of the judgment appealed from. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
926.7007 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 952.226-70, Subcontracting Goals under Section 3021(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-486) (Energy Policy Act), in solicitations for Energy Policy Act procurements.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 952.226-71, Utilization of Energy Policy Act Target Entities, in contracts for the Energy Policy Act requirements with an award value in excess of the simplified acquisition threshold.
( c ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 952.226-72, Energy Policy Act Subcontracting Goals and Reporting Requirements, in contracts for Energy Policy Act requirements with an award value in excess of $500,000 ($1,000,000 in the case of construction).
( d ) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 952.226-73, Energy Policy Act Target Group Representation, in solicitations for Energy Policy Act procurements.
( e ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 52.219-14, Limitation on Subcontracting, in contracts for Energy Policy Act requirements with an entity from among the Energy Policy Act target groups.
[60 FR 22300, May 5, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 42074, Aug. 5, 1997; 75 FR 69013, Nov. 10, 2010]
#### 970.1170-1 Policy.

Each contract for the management and operation of a DOE site or facility, and other contracts designated by the DOE or the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Senior Procurement Executive, must contain a scope of work section that describes, in general terms, work planned and/or required to be performed. Work to be performed under the contract shall be assigned through the use of a work authorization to control individual work activities performed within the scope of work. Work authorizations must be issued prior to the commencement of the work and incurrence of any costs.

[72 FR 29434, May 29, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 36371, July 22, 2009]
642.271 Government Technical Monitor (GTM). ( a ) *Policy.* The contracting officer may appoint a Government Technical Monitor (GTM) to assist the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) in monitoring a contractor's performance. The contracting officer may appoint a GTM because of physical proximity to the contractor's work site, or because of special skills or knowledge necessary for monitoring the contractor's work. The contracting officer may also appoint a GTM to represent the interests of another requirements office or post concerned with the contractor's work. A GTM shall be a direct-hire U.S. Government employee.
[69 FR 19338, Apr. 13, 2004]
570.402-2 Publicizing/Advertising. The contracting officer must publish a notice if required by 570.106. The notice should: ( a ) Indicate that the Government's lease is expiring.
( b ) Describe the requirements in terms of type and quantity of space.
( c ) Indicate that the Government is interested in considering alternative space if economically advantageous, and that otherwise the Government intends to pursue a sole source acquisition.
( d ) Advise prospective offerors that the Government will consider the cost of moving, alterations, etc., when deciding whether it should relocate.
( e ) Provide a contact person for those interested in providing space to the Government.
[64 FR 37265, July 9, 1999, as amended at 76 FR 30852, May 27, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CENTEX
CORPORATION'S DECEMBER 31, 1999, FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000018532
<NAME> CENTEX CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         161,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,126,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,096,026
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         602,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                 264,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,401,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        570,179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,785
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,347,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,401,156
<SALES>                                      4,230,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,230,837
<CGS>                                        3,807,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,807,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                75,498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                302,170
<INCOME-TAX>                                   115,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            187,107
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   187,107
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.06


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-20469 Summary Calendar

GUSTAVO LARA GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus WARDEN SMITH; SERGEANT OLIVAREZ; UNKNOWN, Assistant to Sergeant Olivarez; UNKNOWN, Floor Boss; INMATE ANDRES SEGURA; MARK JONES, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

No. 4:04-CV-152

--------------------
Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Texas inmate Gustavo Garcia appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against Warden Mark Jones, prison guard Sgt. Daniel Olivarez, and others, in which he alleges that the defendants failed to protect him from being attacked by another inmate. The district court dismissed the action pursuant2

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. After de novo review of Garcia’s complaint, and accepting his allegations as true, we conclude that the actions of Jones and Olivarez establish that they were not deliberately indifferent to Garcia’s constitutional rights. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 511U.S. 825, 834-35, 844 (1994). Garcia does not challenge the dismissal of the other defendants, so any such claims are abandoned. See Brinkman v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Garcia also argues that the district court erred by denying his motions for a default judgment, discovery, and appointment of counsel. No relief is warranted on these grounds. See Lewis v. Lynn, 236 F.3d 766, 767 (5th Cir. 2001); Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982). The judgment is AFFIRMED. The dismissal of Garcia’s action pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B) counts as his second strike for purposes of the three strikes provision, § 1915(g), because a previous action brought by him was dismissed under § 1915(e)(2)(B). See Garcia v. Espinosa, No. 7:01-CV-285 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 21, 2004); Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Garcia is WARNED that if he accumulates three strikes, he will be barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in any future civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).