alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dolan Chemical Laboratory

4001 Bixby Road

Groveport, OH 43125

T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221

F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168

http://aepenv/labs

Water Analysis

Form REP-703

Rev. 1, 11/2013

Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 5/14/2014

Sample Number: 141608-001 Date Collected: 05/06/2014 08:30 Date Received: 5/6/2014

Recirculation Pond Outlet at Weir 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 2.2 ng/L 1 0.4 TLT 05/09/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141608-002 Date Collected: 05/06/2014 08:30 Date Received: 5/6/2014

FGD Landfill Discharge to Pond 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 162 ng/L 20 8 TLT 05/09/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141608-003 Date Collected: 05/06/2014 08:48 Date Received: 5/6/2014

WWTP Outlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 169 ng/L 20 8 TLT 05/09/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141608-004 Date Collected: 05/06/2014 08:45 Date Received: 5/6/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 178 ng/L 20 8 TLT 05/09/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141608-005 Date Collected: 05/06/2014 08:43 Date Received: 5/6/2014

Secondary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 156 ng/L 20 8 TLT 05/09/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141608-006 Date Collected: 05/06/2014 08:54 Date Received: 5/6/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet B 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 1360 ng/L 50 20 TLT 05/09/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Sample Number: 141608-007 Date Collected: 05/06/2014 08:51 Date Received: 5/6/2014

Primary Clarifier Outlet A 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 1620 ng/L 50 20 TLT 05/13/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

Amos Plant, 141608 Page 1 of 2
Location: Amos Plant Report Date: 5/14/2014

Sample Number: 141608-008 Date Collected: 05/06/2014 08:56 Date Received: 5/6/2014

WWTP Inlet 

Parameter Result Units RL MDL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method

Data 

Qual

Mercury, Hg 192000 ng/L 10000 4000 TLT 05/13/2014 EPA 1631E-2002

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN 

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, 

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit

J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II

Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224

Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Amos Plant, 141608 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 13.1




                        CERTIFICATION OF DOUGLAS TURNBULL
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 13.1




                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection  with the Annual Report of Centrasia  Mining Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the year ending May 31, 2006, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Douglass  Turnbull,
Chief  Executive  Officer,  President  and  Director  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be  retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its staff upon
request.



/S/  DOUGLAS TURNBULL
----------------------------------
Douglas Turnbull,
Chief Executive Officer, President
and Director



<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Zumiez Inc., a Washington corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Qfor the three months ended May2, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Richard M. Brooks, Principal Executive Officer ofthe Company and Trevor S. Lang, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), that:

 

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ RICHARD M. BROOKS        |   | /s/ TREVOR S. LANG                         |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
| Richard M. Brooks            |   | Trevor S. Lang                             |
|                         |   |                                       |
| Principal Executive  Officer |   | Principal Financial  Officer and Secretary |
| May 29 2009             |   | (Principal Accounting  Officer)            |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Zumiez Inc.and will be retained by Zumiez Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Rosar Realty Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, v Paul E. Leavin et al., Appellants-Respondents.

[776 NYS2d 258]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered September 19, 2003, which granted defendant Leavin’s motion for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing the fraud cause of action with respect to conduct occurring before June 26, 1996, and dismissing the causes of action for punitive damages, attorney fees and use and occupancy, denied the motion with respect to the cause of action for unjust enrichment, and denied the motion to amend his answer, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal of defendant Tot-ten unanimously dismissed, without costs, as abandoned.

The motion court correctly determined that defendant Leavin was not estopped from raising the statute of limitations *(see Kaufman v Cohen,*307 AD2d 113, 122 [2003]), that plaintiff did not admit the complaint was untimely *(see Scolite Intl. Corp. v Vincent J. Smith, Inc.,*68 AD2d 417, 421 [1979]), and that plaintiffs limited inquiry—one telephone call to the apartment to determine whether the occupant was truly its rent-controlled tenant of record—was insufficient to give it the benefit of a discovery accrual. The damages alleged were particularized (CPLR 3016 [b]) and sufficient to support the fraud cause of action, since the allegations are best understood as seeking recovery of not only “profits” but also “other damages” consist*296ing of the difference between the rent plaintiff actually received and the amount it should have received had it not been defrauded into believing that the tenant of record was actually occupying the apartment and not profiteering from an illegal subtenant *(cf. Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney,*88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996]).

The punitive damages and attorney fee causes of action were properly dismissed *(Mayes v UVI Holdings,*280 AD2d 153, 161 [2001]; *Kassis v Royal Ins. Co. of Am.,*191 AD2d 384 [1993]), as was the claim for use and occupancy. The cause of action for unjust enrichment was properly held viable since, as the motion court found, there was no express contract, and the proposed laches defense was lacking in merit.

Finally, we dismiss the appeal of pro se defendant Totten, since he has failed to submit a brief or join in his codefendant’s arguments at this juncture. We have considered the parties’ other contentions for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Williams and Friedman, JJ.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

30°18)

BULLETIN 1024 PLATE 7

=

curs

acne see

3680" * >

Mt. Bayard
2aese7

FS" 7 he
Ninemite Wnt
sb, nf BI!

Se

. Walker

MINES AND PROSPECTS
‘Mountain View
‘Adenae

‘Alasko Premier
Daly-Aleske, upper workings
Daly-Alaska, lower workings
Stoner-Clegg-O"tourka
Stoner

Virgiata

Border
Gold Cliff Premier

Contu

Bortholt

9% Group

Silver Bar

Liberty

Nothiger

Evening and Morring Stor
Homestcke

Stlver Coin
Ibex

Jumbo
Heckle

Texas Creek Comstock (Hyder Leod)
Fortuna (Texas Crnek Comstock)

SSBVUKHLSRLSSSSSSESHASSSLEKLSRS SIBLE RRBSVSsS
Ei
2

Recent and
Pleistocene

Coast Range intrusives

EXPLANATION

=
&
a
z
©
River sand ond grovel, |=
local glacial moraines =
18
7+ 74

o
t+ + + 2
Hyder quartz monzonite .
<
=
w
&
&
Ristesasy ee
Boundary gronadiorite °
cS)
a
&
2 ae 4
ee «
5

Texas Creek granodiorite

Tuffaceous graywacke, slate,
argillite, ond quartzite;
some limestone

Hazelton group

Greenstone tuffs and some
volcanic breccias and slate

Geologic boundary

Prospects

@—3343 Stream sample locotion

@— 3342 Slopewash sample locotion

®—3336 Rock sample

location

JURASSIC (7)

5750

For detail of this
‘orea see pl.8 esol

Mt. Dolly
5475

cs
Bose ond geology from US.G.S Bulletin 807

Bore

cs

GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE HYDER DISTRICT, ALASKA

1
L n

0
lid 1

oT
By Wolter S. West, Poul D. Benson, 1949

334310 O - 55 (In pocket)
#### HAVEN, Appellant, v. NICHOLS, Responent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fir Department.

March 23, 1906.)

Action 1 Maude Haven, as executrix, against Wiilia E. Nichols.

J. P. Herren, for appellant.

J. j Lawshe, for respondent.

No opinion. Ord affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
#### § 1032.76 Payments by a handler operating a partially regulated distributing plant.

See § 1000.76.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

R.L.S. Rental Company, Inc., 

d/b/a Mizzou Aviation 

Complainant, 

v. 

City of Joplin, Missouri 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. 16-13-06 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above-referenced 

complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport 

Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part J 6, subpart B, the date by 

which the Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to 

November 30,2015. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

t&/a«f.k 

4tandall S. Fiertz 

Director, Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

Sfd 21f2P1£ 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September . 2015, I caused to be placed in the United States 

mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Shelley A. Ewalt 

McBreen & Kopko 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, NY 11753 

Respondent: 

Mr. Peter Edwards 

602 South Main Street 

Joplin, MO 6480 I 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-61 0 

FAA Airport Compliance and Field Operations, AC0-1 00 

~ Office 

nnerorge of Airport 

ta~ Compliance 

and Management Analysis
908.7101-2 Consolidated acquisition of new vehicles by General Services Administration. ( a ) New vehicles shall be procured in accordance with Federal Property Management Regulations (FPMR) 41 CFR 101-26.501, and 41 CFR 102-1 through 102-220, and Department of Energy Property Management Regulations (DOE-PMR) 41 CFR 109-26.501. Orders for all motor vehicles must be placed utilizing GSA's online vehicle purchasing system (AutoChoice).
( b ) Orders for all motor vehicles shall be submitted utilizing GSA's on-line system (Auto Choice), in accordance with FPMR 41 CFR 101-26.501. Requisitions for sedans, station wagons, and certain light trucks as specified by GSA, should contain a certification that the acquisition is in conformance with Pub. L. 94-163, and Executive Order 12003 and 12375 and subsequent implementations.
( c ) The schedule of dates for submission of orders is contained in FPMR 41 CFR 101-26.501-4. The Heads of Contracting Activities shall consolidate and submit their requirements for passenger automobiles early in the fiscal year. Requisitions for sedans, station wagons and certain types of light trucks shall be submitted through Headquarters as outlined in 908.7101-6. Requisitions for all other types of vehicles shall be submitted directly to GSA.
[49 FR 11945, Mar. 28, 1984; 49 FR 38949, Oct. 2, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9104, Feb. 25, 1994; 77 FR 74386, Dec. 14, 2012]
#### § 1131.40 Classes of utilization.

See § 1000.40.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REG I ON 4

Mr. Robert Colby Director Air Pollution Control Bureau Chattanooga-Hamilton County 6125 Preservation Drive Chattanooga, Tennessee 37416-3638 Dear Mr. Colby : ATLA N T A FEDERAL CE N TER 61 FORSYTH ST REET ATLANTA , GEORGIA 30303-8960 

# APR 1 9 

# 2016

Enclosed i s the final end-of -year report for your agency's FY 2015 Air Pollution Control grant authorized by § 105 ofthe C l ean Air Act. This report outlines your agency's various g rant comm itments and their status. Since there were no issues and no adjustments necessary , your report is now finalized. This letter documents the conclusion of the joint evaluation process required by 40 Code of Federal Regulations 35.115 and identified as a commitment in your FY 2015 Air Planning Agreement under 

### Cross Cutting Issues

. We appreciate the progress you made in FY 20 15 and look forward to continuing ourjoint efforts to protect and improve air quality. If you have any questions regarding your grant, please contact Stuart Perry at (404) 562-8980 or Gwendolyn Grafat (404) 562-9289.

Enclosure Carol L. Kemker Acting Dir ector Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division

I nternet Address (URL) • http ://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclabl e • Prin ted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsume r)
826.202-1 Local area set-aside. ( c ) The contracting officer shall determine whether a local area set-aside should be further restricted to verified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs) or Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSBs) pursuant to subpart 819.70.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
of CNA Financial Corporation
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005
filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Stephen W. LilienthalStephen W. LilienthalChief Executive Officer  120
#### April Catanzaro, Appellant, v John S. Wallenstein, Respondent.

[775 NYS2d 572]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated January 6, 2003, which denied her motion to vacate an order of the same court dated September 10, 2002, granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, upon her default in opposing the motion.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A plaintiff attempting to vacate a default in opposing a motion to dismiss the complaint must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious cause of action *(see Vaval v Malone,*2 AD3d 839 [2003]; *Katsnelson v ELRAC, Inc.,*304 AD2d 619 [2003]). The plaintiff failed to meet this burden. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1

                                 CLARCOR Inc.
              EXHIBIT (11) - COMPUTATIONS OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                   ________

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                      

                                                      Three Months Ended     
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                                    Restated 
                                                     March 1,       March 2, 
                                                       1997           1996   
                                                  -----------------------------
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                   
--------------------------
<S>                                               <C>              <C>  
1. Average number of shares outstanding             15,973,537     15,912,669
                                                                             
2. Net additional shares resulting from                                      
   assumed exercise of stock options*                  431,656        439,461
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                                             
3. Adjusted average shares outstanding                                       
   for fully diluted computation (1 plus 2)         16,405,193     16,352,130
                                                  =============================
                                                                             
Earnings per share of common stock:                                          
                                                                             
   Primary                                               $0.19          $0.24
                                                         =====          =====
                                                   
   Assuming full dilution                                $0.18          $0.23
                                                         =====          =====

</TABLE>

*  Assumes proceeds from exercise of stock options used to purchase treasury
   shares at the greater of the quarter-end or the average market price 
   during the period.

















                                Page 11 of 12
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual Report of GL Energy and Exploration, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  March 31, 2006

/s/ David Michery

Name: David Michery

Title:  Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  March 31, 2006

/s/ Kent Puckett

Name: Kent Puckett

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
#### 9.308 Contract clauses.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor      

# Report: Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor

This annual report (PDF, 1141 pages) focuses on the efforts of U.S. trade beneficiary countries and territories to eliminate the worst forms of child labor through legislation, enforcement mechanisms, policies, and social programs. The report presents:  
                  -  Findings on the prevalence and sectoral distribution of the worst forms of child labor in each country.  
                  -  Country-specific suggestions for government action (since 2009).  
                  -  Individual country assessments that identify where Significant, Moderate, Minimal, or No Advancement has been made (since 2011).  

**Learn more.**
970.3101-00-70 Scope of subpart. ( a ) The Senior Procurement Executive is responsible for developing and revising the policy and procedures for the determination of allowable costs reimbursable under a management and operating contract, and for coordination with other Headquarters' offices having joint interests.
( b ) The Head of the Contracting Activity is responsible for following the policy, principles and standards set forth in this subpart in establishing the compensation and reimbursement provisions of contracts and subcontracts and for submission of deviations for Headquarters consideration and approval.
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36378, July 22, 2009]