alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Bank Mutual Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rick B.
Colberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Rick B. Colberg
-----------------------------
Rick B. Colberg
Chief Financial Officer
March 20, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted).

 

I, R. David Alexander, Jr., President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Citi Trends, Inc.,

 

and

 

I, Bruce D. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of CitiTrends, Inc., certify that:

 

1. We have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Citi Trends, Inc. for the period ended August 1, 2009;

 

2. Based on our knowledge, this quarterly report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3. Based on our knowledge, the financial statements,and other information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

 
| Date:  August 28, 2009 |                                   |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                        |                                   |
|                        |                                   |
|                        | /s/ R. David  Alexander, Jr.      |
|                        | R. David  Alexander, Jr.          |
|                        | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                        | (Principal  Executive Officer)         |
|                        |                                   |
| Date:  August 28, 2009 |                                   |
|                        |                                   |
|                        |                                   |
|                        | /s/ Bruce D.  Smith                    |
|                        | Bruce D. Smith                         |
|                        | Chief Financial  Officer               |
|                        | (Principal  Financial Officer)         |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Citi Trends, Inc. and will beretained by Citi Trends, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
10/18/2010

All: Attached please find a Powerpoint presentation which will be used to overview the Utility MACT regulatory

effort at our Federalism discussion next week. If y ou have an y questions/concerns, please feel free to contact us. I look forward to seeing each of you next week in Washington, D.C. thanx! bob Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy

Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality

Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division Mail Code D243

- 01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541

- 1045 Cell: (919) 306

- 2290 Fax: (919) 541

- 5450

e - mail: way land.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document

-- FOIA Exempt *********************************************************The above e - mail was sent to the following a ddressees:

Tamra.Spielvogel@ncsl.org, Max.Behlke@ncsl.org, mnellenbach@nga.org, bstrobridge@nga.org, sbrown@ecos.org, jsheahan@usmay ors.org, randerson@usmay ors.org, brosenberg@usmay ors.org berndt@nlc.org, wollack@nlc.org, by uhas@icma.org, cfleming@icma.org, jimo@tfgnet.com, sstockdale@tfgnet.com netheredge@csg.org, dmy ers@csg.org jufner@naco.org, kbrubach@county executives.org, mgriffin@count yex ecutives.org , mdouglas@4cleanair.org
**Exhibit 23.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS**

 

As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to (i) the reference in this Form 10-K of ATP Oil & GasCorporation (the “Company”), as well as in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in such Form 10-K, to the report prepared by Ryder Scott Company, L.P. entitled “ATP Oil & Gas Corporation, Estimated FutureReserves and Income Attributable to Certain Leasehold and Royalty Interests, SEC Case, as of December 31, 2004”, dated March 1, 2005 and “ATP Oil & Gas (Netherlands) B.V., Estimated Future Reserves and Income Attributable to CertainLeasehold and Royalty Interests, SEC Case, as of December 31, 2004”, dated March 4, 2005, relating to the estimated quantities of future proved reserves and income attributable to the interests of the Company, and (ii) the incorporation byreference to the report prepared by Ryder Scott Company, L.P. into ATP Oil & Gas Corporation’s previously filed Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-105699 and 333-121662) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-60762). 

 

**Ryder Scott Company, L.P.**

 

Houston, Texas 

March 30, 2005
Exhibit 32










CERTIFICATION




By signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of White River Capital, Inc.




Date:May 11, 2011/s/ John M. Eggemeyer, IIIJohn M. Eggemeyer, IIIChief Executive Officer/s/ Martin J. SzumskiMartin J. SzumskiChief Financial Officer
§ 1206.102 Voting. ( a ) Each eligible first handler and eligible importer of mangos shall be entitled to cast only one ballot in the referendum.
( b ) Proxy voting is not authorized, but an officer or employee of an eligible corporate first handler or importer, or an administrator, executor, or trustee or an eligible entity may cast a ballot on behalf of such entity. Any individual so voting in a referendum shall certify that such individual is an officer or employee of the eligible entity, or an administrator, executive, or trustee of an eligible entity and that such individual has the authority to take such action. Upon request of the referendum agent, the individual shall submit adequate evidence of such authority.
( c ) All ballots are to be cast by mail, as instructed by the Department.
#### WEIL et al., Respondents, v. BAUER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 23, 1906.)

Action by James Weil and another against Ulrike Bauer. K.

C. McDonald, for appellant.

D. J. ■Callert, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### § 1030.17 [Reserved]
§ 1.212 What is the Department's policy on providing official information or testimony relating to official information in response to a demand? ( a ) It is the Department's general policy not to allow its employees to provide official information or testimony relating to official information in response to a demand. However, the Department will consider a demand submitted in accordance with this subpart and issue a decision to grant or deny the demand.
( b ) No employee may provide official information or testimony relating to official information in response to a demand unless authorized by the Department in accordance with this subpart. *See United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951). An employee who fails to comply with this regulation may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including removal.
Responsibilities if Making a Demand
PEORIA

Lake Pleasant

Regional Park

!"c$

?Â

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Tule

Creek

ACEC

Hieroglyphic

Mountains SRMA

Lake Pleasant/

Agua Fria SCRMA

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

± Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

Map 2-26

Castle Hot Springs

Management Unit

Multiple Resource Allocations &

Special Area Designation

Alternative B

0 1 2 3 4

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Management Unit

Resource Allocations

Tule Creek ACEC Fence

Special Area Designation

Special Recreation

Management Area

Special Cultural Resource

Management Area

(SCRMA) - Public Use

Area of Critical

Environmental Concern

(ACEC)

County Boundary
T4

T7

T10

T8

T3

M5

M6

T6

T5

T2

M2

M1

M8

M12

M7

M13

M4

T15

T16

RX2

RX1

T13

T11

T9

M9

RX5

T12

T14

RX3

M10

T-33

T-32

T-37

T-35

M-11

T-30

M-16 T-34 T-23

RX-08

T-26

M-25 T-24

M-24

0 0.5 1 2 3

Miles 4 ml 4/09

Sugar Pine Map 8

Owl PAC/HRCA

Legend

Spotted Owl

PAC

HRCA
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1094 

To amend the General Education Provisions Act to ensure that a student 

is not required to submit to a survey, analysis, or evaluation that reveals 

personal information about such student or their family without prior 

written consent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2023 

Mrs. MILLER of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the General Education Provisions Act to ensure 

that a student is not required to submit to a survey, 

analysis, or evaluation that reveals personal information 

about such student or their family without prior written 

consent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Parents Opt-in Protec5 tion Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1094 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PUPILS’ RIGHTS. 

2 Section 445 of the General Education Provisions Act 

3 (20 U.S.C. 1232h) is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (b)— 

5 (A) by striking ‘‘prior consent of the stu6 dent’’ and inserting ‘‘prior written consent of 

7 the student’’; and 

8 (B) by inserting before the period at the 

9 end the following: ‘‘, for such specific survey, 

10 analysis, or evaluation’’; and 

11 (2) in subsection (c)(2)(A)— 

12 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause 

13 (i); 

14 (B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘subpara15 graph (C).’’ and inserting ‘‘clause (i) or (iii) of 

16 subparagraph (C); and’’; and 

17 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(iii) not require a student to submit 

19 to a survey described in subparagraph 

20 (C)(ii) without the prior written consent of 

21 the student (if the student is an adult or 

22 emancipated minor), or in the case of an 

23 unemancipated minor, without the prior 

24 written consent of the parent, for such spe25 cific survey.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
9904.403-61 Interpretation. ( a ) Questions have arisen as to the requirements of 9904.403, Cost Accounting Standard, Allocation of Home Office Expenses to Segments, for the purpose of allocating State and local income taxes and franchise taxes based on income (hereinafter collectively referred to as income taxes) from a home office of an organization to its segments.
( b ) By means of an illustrative allocation base in 9904.403-60, the Standard provides that income taxes are to be allocated by “any base or method which results in an allocation that equals or approximates a segment's proportionate share of the tax imposed by the jurisdiction in which the segment does business, as measured by the same factors used to determine taxable income for that jurisdiction.” This provision contains two essential criteria for the allocation of income taxes from a home office to segments. First, the taxes of any particular jurisdiction are to be allocated only to those segments that do business in the taxing jurisdiction. Second, where there is more than one segment in a taxing jurisdiction, the taxes are to be allocated among those segments on the basis of “the same factors used to determine the taxable income for that jurisdiction.” The questions that have arisen relate primarily to whether segment book income or loss is a “factor” for this purpose.
( c ) Most States tax a fraction of total organization income, rather than the book income of segments that do business within the State. The fraction is calculated pursuant to a formula prescribed by State statute. In these situations the book income or loss of individual segments is not a factor used to determine taxable income for that jurisdiction. Accordingly, in States that tax a fraction of total organization income, rather than the book income of segments within the State, such book income is irrelevant for tax allocation purposes. Therefore, segment book income is to be used as a factor in allocating income tax expense from a home office to segments only where this amount is expressly used by the taxing jurisdiction in computing the income tax.
#### In the Matter of Robert W. Willis, Respondent-Appellant, v Martin H. Von Holden, as Director of Central New York Psychiatric Center, et al., Appellants-Respondents.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, to petitioner; cross appeal dismissed. Memorandum: Respondents’ assertion on appeal that the court lacks jurisdiction in this proceeding is without merit. Not only does the answer to the petition admit service upon the Department of Mental Hygiene, but the jurisdictional objection recited in paragraph "second” of the answer relates only to respondents Welton and Von Holden and not to the department. Moreover, Welton and Von Holden are named in this proceeding only in their representative capacities and not individually (cf. *Foster v McMorran,*33 AD2d 978). We affirm the judgment on the basis that petitioner’s resignation was not voluntarily made. It resulted directly from the coercive manner and circumstances in which his interrogation was conducted. Thus viewed, it is unnecessary to address the separate issue of whether the denial of an opportunity to obtain the advice of an attorney constituted a denial of due process. Finally, petitioner’s cross appeal must be dismissed inasmuch as no appeal may be taken from the language of an opinion or decision (CPLR 5701). (Appeals from judgment of Oneida Supreme Court — art 78.) Present — Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Schnepp, JJ.
#### § 1005.78 Charges on overdue accounts.

See § 1000.78.
#### § 1160.504 Personal liability.

No member or employee of the Board shall be held personally responsible, either individually or jointly, in any way whatsoever to any person for errors in judgment, mistakes, or other acts of either commission or omission by such member or employee, except for acts of dishonesty or willful misconduct.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Does Raising the State Compulsory Attendance Age Achieve the Intended Outcomes?      

# Does Raising the State Compulsory Attendance Age Achieve the Intended Outcomes?

This study from the Department of Education's National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance analyzes whether raising the age of state compulsory school attendance has an impact on dropout, truancy, and disciplinary actions, as well as broader social outcomes. 

http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=364
#### 970.1707-4 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at 970.5217-1, Strategic Partnership Projects Program (Non-DOE Funded Work), in any contract that may involve work under the Strategic Partnership Projects Program, pursuant to 970.1707-3(b).

[69 FR 75003, Dec. 15, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 15519, Mar. 24, 2015]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10556 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10556

 To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to promptly comply with 
 State requests for information regarding the citizenship status of an 
                              individual.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2024

 Ms. Van Duyne (for herself and Mr. Crenshaw) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to promptly comply with 
 State requests for information regarding the citizenship status of an 
                              individual.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voter Eligibility Verification Act 
of 2024''.

SEC. 2. PROMPT RELEASE OF INFORMATION.

    Section 642(c) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1373(c)) is amended by inserting 
after ``shall respond to an inquiry'' the following ``, not later than 
30 days after receipt of such inquiry,''.
                                 <all>
```
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

!"a$

!"c$

!"c$

!"a$ White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

HASSAYAMPA

MU

HARQUAHALA

MOUNTAINS MU

CASTLE HOT

SPRINGS MU

HARCUVAR

MU

BLACK

CANYON

MU

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

± Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

?¿

?Â

Aã

?3⁄4

Iz

I}

Iv

Iv

Iz

Map 2-39

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Areas

Management Units

Alternative C

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Management Unit (MU)
#### § 1124.78 Charges on overdue accounts.

See § 1000.78.
#### Home Funding Company, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Merrick Mall Corporation et al., Defendants.

Motion by plaintiffs, pursuant to statute (OPLR 5704), to vacate an ex parte order, made by a Justice of the Supreme Court on December 14, 1964, extending to January 4, 1965 the time of the defendant Merrick Mall Corporation to answer the complaint or to make any motion addressed thereto. Motion denied. Beldoek, P. J., TJgheftta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.