alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jim P. Benge, M.D. and Kelsey-Seybold Medical Group 

PLLC v. Lauren Williams

Appellate case number: 01-12-00578-CV

Trial court case number: 2010-52657

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

Appellants and appellee have cited websites in their briefs, which were not part of 

the record below. The parties are ordered to confer concerning whether they agree that 

the Court may, or may not, take judicial notice of any of the facts stated in the websites. 

If the parties agree that the Court may take judicial notice of any of the facts stated in the 

websites, they should so notify the Court no later than Thursday, June 13, 2013.

To the extent that the parties cannot agree on whether the matters are subject to 

judicial notice, the parties are each ordered to file supplemental briefs that address the 

propriety of the Court taking judicial notice of any of the facts stated in the web sites.

Each supplemental brief or any reply brief shall not exceed seven pages in length. 

Appellants’ and appellee’s supplemental briefs, if any, are due no later than Thursday, 

June 13, 2013. Any reply by either appellants or appellee is due no later than Thursday, 

June 20, 2013.

No further briefs, replies, responses, or sur-replies on any issue may be filed in 

this case absent good cause after noon on Tuesday, June 25, 2013.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: s/Harvey Brown

 X Acting individually ☐ Acting for the Court

Date: June 5, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of Harvard Bioscience, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Companys annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                    |  |                               
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: March 15 2007 |  | /s/ CHANE GRAZIANO            
|                    |  | Name: Chane Graziano          
|                    |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Culturally Responsive Pathways to Peer Programming in Tribal Communities      

# Resource: Culturally Responsive Pathways to Peer Programming in Tribal Communities

This brief (PDF, 30 pages) discusses traditional approaches to peer recovery support services (PRSS) in American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) Tribes and their role in sustaining Tribal substance use disorder (SUD) recovery today. The brief describes the history of PRSS in Tribal communities, explores the importance of cultural responsiveness in peer programming, and shares examples of best practice-models of intervention. **Learn more** (PDF, 30 pages).
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 7436

BRYANT MATTHEW PARKER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. DIRECTOR OF THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Anthony John Trenga , Senior District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv - 00807

- AJT

- MSN )

Submitted : January 31, 2023 Decided: February 16, 2023

Before WYNN, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Bryant Matthew Parker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7436 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/16/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Bryant Matthew Parker seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition and denying reconsideration . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demo nstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 16 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must d emonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) ). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Parker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Parker ’ s motions for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

an d legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7436 Doc: 17 Filed: 02/16/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 30026 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JOSEPH D. MELANCON

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:13

- CR

- 132

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Joseph D. Melancon has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Melancon h a s not filed a response . We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
November 30, 2015
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-30026 Document: 00513288526 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/30/2015No. 15

- 30026

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-30026 Document: 00513288526 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/30/2015
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Employment and Unemployment Among Youth – Summer 2014

Released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Employment and Unemployment Among Youth—Summer 2014” provides a statistical overview of employed youth from April to July 2014. The data reflect an increase in youth employment compared with the same time frame in 2013. 

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/youth.nr0.htm?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
#### WARNER, Respondent, v. HOLMES, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by Ellen E. Warner against Franklin S. Holmes.

No opinion. This order for the taking of depo. sition of a person not a party cannot, stand, for it was granted at Special Term, instead of by a judge, the affidavits presented were insufficient in material matters, and the order itself is indefinite, if not defective. The order is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion is denied, with $10 costs.
47 So.2d 678

#### FONTENOT *v.*BABINEAUX et al.

No. 39502.

June 30, 1950.

William R. Tete, of Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellant.

Joe J. Tritico, and Bass & Brame, all of Lake Charles, for defendants-appellees.

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

The appeal in this case was transferred to this court by order of the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit on the joint motion of the parties litigant declaring simply “that the amount in dispute between the parties is in excess of $2,000.”

The appeal to the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit was originally taken by the plaintiff, John C. Fontenot, from a judgment of the lower court dismissing the proceedings instituted by him under the provisions of Section 2155 of the Revised Statutes of 1870 to eject the defendants, Jesse and Harry Babineaux, from the premises leased by him at the corner of Cities Service and Maplewood Parish roads *899in Calcasieu Parish for an implied breach of the contract of lease.

This lease was originally executed by the plaintiff in favor of the Develins Corporation on March 1, 1947, for a term of five years (with provisions for renewal) and was assigned to the present defendants in November of 1947 with the approval of the plaintiff. As originally rented, the property was a bare lot of ground. The monetary consideration was only $25 a month, but another provision of the contract called for the erection of a frame building on the property that would become the property of the plaintiff regardless of whether the lease was terminated under its own terms or for cause. Complying with this provision, the defendants are now operating a business there and the implied breach of the contract is based upon the allegation of the plaintiff that the business being operated is illegal, consisting of gambling games and devices in open violation of the law.

Clearly the only issue in the case is the right to the possession of the property before the expiration of the lease and there is no allegation in the petition and no evidence in the record from which it can be concluded the value of this right is in excess of $2,000. This court is, therefore, without jurisdiction. The stipulation of counsel in the joint motion that the amount in dispute exceeds $2,000 is not controlling, being nothing more than a conclusion of counsel without any basis in fact.

For the reasons assigned, it is ordered that this appeal be transferred to the Court of Appeal for the First Circuit, the record to be transmitted there by the appellant within thirty days; otherwise the appeal will be dismissed at appellant’s cost.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Partnering with Relatives to Promote Reunification      

# Resource: Partnering with Relatives to Promote Reunification

This fact sheet (PDF, 10 pages) shares stories and advice from caregivers and birth parents who have experienced kinship care on the importance of maintaining boundaries, managing family dynamics, building trust, positive parenting and communication, and securing support. **Learn more.**
#### § 1030.51 Class I differential and price.

The Class I differential shall be the differential established for Cook County, Illinois, which is reported in § 1000.52. The Class I price shall be the price computed pursuant to § 1000.50(a) for Cook County, Illinois.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Permanency Planning with Youth      

# Resource: Permanency Planning with Youth

This webpage shares resources to help child welfare professionals as they permanency plan with youth. The webpage provides links to resources on culturally responsive practices, identity development, and youth engagement.**Learn more.**
Comments on Portland Cement NSPS Keith Barnett to: jportocarrero 07/30/2009 02:32 PM Show Details

Dear Mr. Portocarrero: I have written up a short note of our conversation a few days ago. Could you review what I wrote and add an y corrections? For the list of kilns that Humboldt build I added the year based on the PCA plant directory. Please note if the dates are correct.

Also, I have two additional questions? 1. Can you explain the difference between a sulfur bypass and a n alkali bypass? 2. Can you think of any other possible kilns that have the 100 percent bypass of kiln gases in the Humboldt comment letter. I spoke with the Santa Cruz plant you mentioned and indicated they didn't have 100 percent bypass, so I am wondering if you can provide any additional examples. Thanks for your help. Keith W. Barnett USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG Mail Code D243

- 02 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 919

- 541

- 5605 barnett.keith@epa.gov
#### 9904.408-10 [Reserved]
901.602-3 Ratification of unauthorized commitments. ( b ) ( 2 ) The Senior Procurement Executives are authorized to ratify unauthorized commitments.
( 3 ) The ratification authority of the DOE and NNSA Senior Procurement Executives in paragraph (b)(2) of this section is delegated to the Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA) for individual unauthorized commitments of $25,000 or under. The ratification authority of the HCA is nondelegable.
[61 FR 41704, Aug. 9, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 7689, Feb. 11, 2011]
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report   of  Geneva  Resources,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending  August 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Marcus Johnson,  Chief Executive  Officer/President  of the Company and I, D.
Bruce  Horton,  Chief  Financial  Officer/Treasurer  of  the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 10, 2008              By: /s/ MARCUS JOHNSON
                                        _________________________________
                                            Marcus Johnson
                                            Chief Executive Officer/President


Date: October 10, 2008              By: /s/ D. BRUCE HORTON
                                        _________________________________
                                            D. Bruce Horton
                                            Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

 NATIONAL EXPOSURE RESEARCH LABORATORY

 CINCINNATI, OH 45268

 Method 445.0

In Vitro Determination of Chlorophyll a and Pheophytin a

in Marine and Freshwater Algae by Fluorescence OFFICE OF

 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

 Revision 1.2 

ERRATA SHEET

Section1.4 - References numbered 5-8 should be numbered 6-8.

Section 12.2 - Equation for calculating the “corrected” concentration of chlorophyll a in the whole water

sample is as follows:

CS,c = CE,c X extract volume (L) X DF

 Sample volume (L)

Where, CS,c = corrected chlorophyll a concentration (μg/L) in the whole water sample

extract volume = volume (L) of extract prepared before dilution

Section 13.4.1 - The following has been added to the second paragraph.

The reported p-EDLs reflect between-lab variability and extraction variability. There was,

however, a major flaw in the study design. Even though the concentrations used could be easily determined

by fluorometry after appropriate dilution, we did not specify to the labs the dilution factor to be used. 

Because of that, each lab diluted at their discretion. Dilution factors ranged from 10-2000. The

“observed” concentration by each fluorometer was not the reported concentration used in the multi-lab

statistical analysis. Since p-EDLs are based on an estimate of variance (standard deviation) of the reported

concentration in the extract, the p-EDL for fluorometry is not reflective of the concentration actually

observed by the instrument. Since all the participants used different dilution factors there was no way to

correct the determined p-EDLs for the fluorometric techniques. It is safe to say that the statistically

determined p-EDLs are at least 1000 times too high. Still, fluorometry yielded the lowest p-EDLs. The pEDLs for the other methods are valid.

Table 4 - The following has been added to footnote 5.

This is due to a flaw in the study design and not due to any inherent limitations of fluorometry. 

Please see Section 13.4.1 for a discussion of the determination of p-EDLs. Single-lab EDLs may be 1000

times lower than the p-EDLs reported here.

Tables 4-9 - The following footnote has been added. 

Reported concentrations (ppm) are for the 10 mL extraction volume and not the concentrations in

the whole water sample. Using the notation of Section 12 of the method, this would be CE,c.

Table 9 - Eighth column, last value should be 0.675