alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

From: Office of Air Qual ity Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

To: EGU NSPS Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495)

Date: September, 2013

Subject: Costing Analysis for Partial CCS

Sources of Information

Figure 1 shows the 3 primary sources of informa tion for estimating the cost and performance of technologies for the proposed GHG standards.

Figure 1: Sources of Cost and Performance Information

Document Primary use Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity, Revision 1, August 2007 (DOE/NETL2007/1281) Baseline technology performance and costs

Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy
Plants Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity, Revision 2, November 2010 (DOE/NETL-2010/1397) Update technology costs

Cost and Performance of PC and IGCC Plants for a Range of Carbon Dioxide Capture, May 27, 2011 (DOE/NETL-2011/1498) Estimate cost and performance of partial CCS

Table 8.2 Cost and Performa nce Characteristics of

N ew Central Station Electricity Generating Technologies, Annual Energy Outlook 2013 Early Release (Energy Information Administration) Comparison of relative costs of simple and combined cycle technologies

The 2007 NETL report is the primary source of technol ogy cost and performance data used for the proposal. However, capital, variable , and fixed operating costs and CO 2 transmission, storage, and monitoring (TS&M) costs were up dated using the cost informati on in the 2010 NETL report. To estimate the costs and performance for partial carbon capture and storage (CCS), we used the partial capture costs in the 2011 NETL repor t. The attached Excel file in cludes the detailed calculations.

Costing Approach

The capital, fixed, and variable cost s are essentially linear in the 2011 NETL report. The partial costing analysis scales these costs linearly with the percent carbon capture. We also scaled the water use, risk premium, net power output, and efficiency using a linear relationship. To estimate the CO 2 TS&M costs, we used a linear fit to NETL partial capture case and adjusted the cost s to match the 90% capture costs. The impact of this is that there is a certain fixed cost for small amounts of capture and the relative costs on a $/ton basis of captured CO 2 decrease with increased levels of capture. Finally, for the pulverized coal case, we removed the 3% climate uncertainty adder entirely for both the partial and full capture

cases.
(October 21, 1964)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Joseph Battle, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

This is an appeal from an order entered on December 27, 1950 denying a writ of error *coram nobis*without a hearing. Notice of appeal was filed on January 8, 1951 and on January 10, 1963 this court granted permission to proceed as a poor person. Appeal dismissed because of defendant’s failure to seek an extension of time to perfect his appeal pursuant to section 535 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (See *People*v. *Webster,*12 N Y 2d 1019.) Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Thomas Murphy, Appellant, v Board of Education of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondents to reinstate petitioner to his position as a high school teacher, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 5, 1977, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We are affirming solely on the ground that the petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. We do not adopt the reasoning of Special Term in relation to a due process hearing and have not reached the issue of whether, *979under the circumstances of this record, petitioner may have been terminated before the end of his probationary period or for improper reasons. Titone, J. P., Suozzi, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ., concur.
#### Tilda Lewis, Respondent, v. David Lewis, Appellant.

Order, entered September 29, 1964, granting plaintiff wife’s motion for temporary alimony and counsel fee in an action for separation and directing defendant husband to pay $340 per week temporary alimony plus the $512.50 monthly rental and arrears in addition to payments for his daughter’s tuition and clothing unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by reducing the weekly payments from $340 to $250, and by excluding from the direction to pay any and all arrears for rent for the apartment and garage space, any and all arrears existing prior to the date of the service of plaintiff’s motion, and as so modified is affirmed, without costs to either party. Although the husband may have given the wife a weekly allowance of $340 prior to their separation while the family lived in their own house, the defendant husband and their son no longer live with the wife, and the daughter is largely provided for independently. Consequently, $250 per week plus rent is adequate to maintain the wife’s standard of living pending final disposition of this action. The wife’s claims as to the husband’s disposable income are admittedly based on her limited knowledge of his business affairs, and this claimed disposable income admittedly exceeds by far his net taxable income. Temporary alimony should not be based on such speculative claims. The wife is presumed to have been suitably provided for prior to her bringing *861of the present application and may not recover as temporary alimony on summary application any obligations she may previously have incurred *(Brody*v. *Brody,*3 A D 2d 992; cf. Domestic Relations Law, § 236). Consequently, the award of any and all arrears in rent, including that for garage space, must be eliminated insofar as it directs the husband to pay any arrears existing prior to the wife’s application for temporary alimony. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1910

_____________________________
L AWRENCE G EORGE R OBINSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John L. Miller , Judge

. July 29, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. Lawrence George Robinson raises two issues on appeal: (a) whether the trial court’s determination that he violated probation was based solely on hearsay
, and (b) whether his sentence should be corrected to reflect an award of 104 days jail credit. We affirm as to the first issue, but reverse and remand as to the second. As the State concedes, the amended judgment and sentence did not reflect the corrected jail credit of 104 days’ time served and should be corrected on remand

. See McCool v. State
, 211 So. 3d 304 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ( explaining that a “ defendant is entitled to an award of credit for all time spent in jail prior to sentencing in a violation of probation case, which includes all time spent in jail prior to original sentencing plus all time spent in jail2 prior to any subsequent violation sentencings. ” ) (quoting Jenkins v. State , 749 So. 2d 527, 528 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) )

.
R EVERSED and R EMANDED for resentencing.

M AKAR , W INOKUR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold
, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09056**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 09056\09056_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09056\09056_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 09056\09056_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09056\09056_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09056\09056_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09056\09056_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09056\09056_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

09056\Certification Statement Plant ID 09056.pdf Plant certification statement x 09056\Supplemental Documents\09056_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09056\Supplemental Documents\09056_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
#### § 1.71 Purpose.

This subpart establishes procedures for developing special working relationships with the Department of Agriculture requested by producers of films for television use. These procedures are designed to guide Department employees and producers of commercial television pictures in entering into such arrangements.
#### Helen Bruszewski, plaintiff in error, v. Victor Neamond, defendant in error.

Gen. No. 34,554.

Opinion filed March 24, 1931.

Rehearing denied April 6, 1931,

*640Joseph A. Weber, for plaintiff in error.

Willard O. Lindsay, for defendant in error; B. M. Shaffner, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### 970.4501 General.
#### In the Matter of Amstel Recycling & Concrete Corp. et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[776 NYS2d 272]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael V Ajello, J.), entered December 8, 2003, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Environmental Control Board’s determination that petitioner was operating a non-putrescible solid waste fill material transfer station without a permit, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

It appears that petitioner accepts solid waste into its facility, namely, discarded broken-up concrete, and turns it into smaller pieces of concrete for sale to roadway and construction contractors. Respondent determined that such activity makes petitioner a “transfer station” for which a permit is required. Petitioner argues that such determination is contrary to the definition of transfer station in Administrative Code of the City of New York § 16-130 (a) (5). That provision defines a “non-putrescible solid waste transfer station” as “any structure, building or other premises ... at which only non-putrescible solid waste is received for the purpose of subsequent transfer to another location, regardless of whether such non-putrescible solid waste is subject to any processing or reduction in volume at such structure, building or premises.” In addition, “solid waste” is *327defined as “all putrescible and non-putrescible materials or substances . . . that are discarded or rejected . . . includ[ing] recyclable materials” (Administrative Code § 16-130 [a] [1]); “non-putrescible solid waste” is defined as including concrete (Administrative Code § 16-130 [a] [3]; *see also*16 RCNY 4-01 [defining, inter alia, “(f)ill material transfer station”]); and “[r]ecydable materials” are defined as “solid waste that may be separated, collected, processed, marketed and returned to the economy in the form of raw materials or products” (Administrative Code § 16-303 [i]). Respondent’s determination is based on a finding that petitioner’s transformation of discarded broken-up concrete into salable smaller pieces of concrete is “processing” that, while changing the size and volume, and therefore the value and marketability, of the concrete it receives, does not change its nature as solid waste. Such determination involves application of special expertise in the field of sanitation to interpret statutory language, and is therefore entitled to deference as long as it does not run counter to the plain meaning of the above definitions *(see Matter of Raritan Dev. Corp. v Silva,*91 NY2d 98, 102-103 [1997]). It does not. We have considered petitioners’ other contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Lerner, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
#### § 1131.76 Payments by handler operating a partially regulated distributing plant.

See § 1000.76.
##### 



Exhibit 31-5 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, J. Barry Mitchell, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Commonwealth Edison Company;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 26, 2005
    /s/ J. Barry MitchellSenior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Reducing Sodium in Children's Diets      

# Reducing Sodium in Children's Diets

Approximately nine in 10 children, ages 6-18 eat too much sodium daily. One in six children has raised blood pressure, an issue that can be improved by eating a healthy diet low in sodium. Tips for parents on improving the health of children include modeling healthy eating and buying the lowest sodium food options at the grocery store. 

http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/children-sodium?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Web-Based Prototype Application for Free and Reduced Price School Meals      

# Resource: Web-Based Prototype Application for Free and Reduced Price School Meals

This electronic prototype application serves as a model for how state and local program operators can develop effective and fully-compliant web-based applications for school meal benefits. 

http://www.fns.usda.gov/school-meals/web-based-prototype-application?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_content=Reports-and-Resources
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Projections of Education Statistics to 2025      

# Report: Projections of Education Statistics to 2025

This annual report provides national-level data for the past 15 years and projections to the year 2025 on enrollment, teachers, high school graduates, and expenditures at the elementary and secondary level; and enrollment and degrees at the postsecondary level.

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017019&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Report