alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
6101.25 Decisions and settlements[Rule 25]. ( a ) *Decisions.* The Board issues decisions in writing, except as allowed by Rule 52 (48 CFR 6101.52). The Board will send a copy of a decision to each party, requesting confirmation of receipt (see Rule 1 (48 CFR 6101.1)), and will post the decision on its website. If a decision reserves any part of a case for later proceedings, it is conclusive as to the matters it resolves, except as provided in Rules 26 and 28 (48 CFR 6101.26 and 6101.28).
( b ) *Settlements.* Parties may settle a case by stipulating to an award. The Board may issue a decision making the stipulated award if: ( 1 ) The Board is satisfied that it has jurisdiction; and
( 2 ) The stipulation states that no party will seek reconsideration of, seek relief from, or appeal the Board's decision.
Exhibit 99.(c)

                          Certificate as to Compliance
                          ----------------------------


     I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of Household Finance Corporation (the
"Master Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with Section 4.10 of the
Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 28, 2000 among Household
Automotive Trust VI, as Issuer, Household Auto Receivables Corporation, as
Seller, the Master Servicer and JPMorgan Chase Bank, (formerly The Chase
Manhattan Bank), as Trustee (the "Master Sale and Servicing Agreement"), that:

          1.   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer from January 1
          through December 31, 2002 (the "Year") and of its performance under
          the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my
          supervision; and

          2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Master
          Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under the
          Master Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 31st day of March, 2003.


                                       /s/ Steven H. Smith
                                       -------------------
                                       Steven H. Smith
                                       Servicing Officer
# FILED FEB 1 0 2016

CLERK

, C.J. Parraguirre
, J. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
No. 69339 FRANK MILFORD PECK, Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE; AND K. JONES, DEPUTY CLERK, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.



### ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner complains that the district court's filing of his documents was untimely. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. 

### See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

ss 

# i r i e l */ Douglas

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA cc: Frank Milford Peck

Attorney GeneraliCarson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
(0) [947A cep
616.505 Ordering. ( b ) ( 5 ) The Departmental Advocate for Competition is designated the task and delivery order ombudsman.
[64 FR 43624, Aug. 11, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 19332, Apr. 13, 2004; 80 FR 6920, Feb. 9, 2015]
915.607 Criteria for acceptance and negotiation of an unsolicited proposal. ( c ) DOE's cost participation policy, at subpart 917.70, shall be followed in determining the extent to which the DOE will participate in the cost for the proposed effort.
[74 FR 36364, July 22, 2009]
#### 752.222-70 USAID disability policy.

As prescribed in 722.810, the contracting officer must insert the following clause in Section H of all solicitations and resulting awards.

# USAID Disability Policy (DEC 2004)

(a) The objectives of the USAID Disability Policy are:

(1) To enhance the attainment of United States foreign assistance program goals by promoting the participation and equalization of opportunities of individuals with disabilities in USAID policy, country and sector strategies, activity designs and implementation;

(2) To increase awareness of issues of people with disabilities both within USAID programs and in host countries;

(3) To engage other U.S. Government agencies, host country counterparts, governments, implementing organizations and other donors in fostering a climate of nondiscrimination against people with disabilities; and

(4) To support international advocacy for people with disabilities. The full text of USAID's policy can be found at the following Web site: *http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDABQ631.pdf*.

(b) USAID therefore requires that the contractor not discriminate against people with disabilities in the implementation of USAID programs and that it make every effort to comply with the objectives of the USAID Disability Policy in performing this contract. To that end and within the scope of the contract, the contractor's actions must demonstrate a comprehensive and consistent approach for including men, women, and children with disabilities.

(End of clause)

[79 FR 74998, Dec. 16, 2014, as amended at 89 FR 4209, Jan. 23, 2024]
#### § 1032.52 Adjusted Class I differentials.

See § 1000.52.
#### Ira E. Garr, P.C., Respondent, v Sara Kinberg, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 805]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula J. Omansky, J.), entered April 1, 2003, which, in an action to recover a legal fee, denied defendant’s motion to vacate a restraining notice on her bank account, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While it appears that defendant deposits into the subject account maintenance and child support payments made by her ex-husband pursuant to the agreement that settled their divorce, that settlement agreement shows that defendant has ample other resources and is not dependent on the money in the account for her or her dependents’ daily living expenses and other reasonable needs. Accordingly, the money in the account is not exempt from enforcement under CPLR 5205 (d) (3). Defendant’s assertion that she never received the substantial assets to which she was entitled under the settlement agreement lacks evidentiary support and fails to raise an issue of fact as to her lack of other resources. We also reject defendant’s argument that plaintiff has a charging lien enforceable against her ex-husband’s attorney. That lien, which was fixed by the justice who presided over defendant’s divorce and restrained her exhusband’s attorney from distributing marital property in the amount of the lien, by its terms was to remain in effect only until a fee arbitration panel decided the parties’ fee dispute. As it happened, there was no arbitration, and plaintiff successfully pursued the judicial remedy he now seeks to enforce (3 AD3d 322 [2004]). We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION









Pursuant to Sections 302 and 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Zhou Chang Sheng, Chief Executive Officer of YaSheng Group, Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1. the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated: March 15, 2010










/S/ Zhou Chang Sheng

Zhou Chang Sheng

Chief Executive Officer
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

!"a$

!"c$

!"c$

!"a$ White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

± Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

?¿

?Â

Aã

?3⁄4

Iz

I}

Iv

Iv

Iz

Map 2-43

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Areas

Closed to Locatable Minerals

Alternative C

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Management Unit

Closed to Locatable Minerals

Closed to Locatable Minerals

Reconvey Riparian
#### 915.207 Handling proposals and information.
**Exhibit 32-5**
**Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code**
     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofCommonwealth Edison Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, that (i) thereport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CommonwealthEdison Company.     Date: July 26, 2005 /s/ J. Barry Mitchell         J. Barry Mitchell    Senior Vice President, Treasurer and    Chief Financial Officer  
14
December 23, 2011

David W. Webster

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region I

5 Post Office Square, Suite 100

Boston, MA 02109-3912

RE: CZM Federal Consistency Review of Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small 

Vessel General Permit (SVGP); Statewide.

Dear Mr. Keegan:

The Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM) has received the 

necessary information to initiate our federal consistency review for the proposed project 

referenced above.

The notice that this proposal is undergoing consistency review by CZM will be 

published in the next edition of the Environmental Monitor. The published date of that Monitor

will initiate a 21-day public comment period. Enclosed please find a copy of the schedule 

that we will follow during our consistency review. Although we have 60 days (extendable 

with your permission) in which to review your determination and to concur or object, we 

will make a vigorous effort to complete our review shortly after the close of the comment 

period.

Note: We cannot complete our review and issue a decision of consistency with our 

program policies until all applicable state environmental agency permits, licenses, certificates 

and other authorizations have been issued. Further, if they are required, federal permits

cannot be issued until the federal permitting agency receives a consistency concurrence letter 

from CZM for the proposed project. To keep our review timely, we suggest that you 

forward copies of applicable state environmental agency permits, licenses, etc. to CZM as 

you receive them.
Future communications with this office regarding the technical aspects of the abovereferenced project should be directed to Todd Callaghan, who will be conducting the federal 

consistency review of this project for the CZM Office. Please call me at (617) 626-1050 if 

you have any procedural questions about the review process.

Sincerely, 

Robert L. Boeri

Project Review Coordinator

RLB/pb

Enclosure

czm# 8999, 9000

 
CZM Federal Consistency Review Schedule

For a Federal Agency Activity*

Review Steps

1. Document Receipt

Received consistency determination on Dec. 22, 2011.

2. Public Notice

(a) Notice of the initiation of this federal

consistency review will appear in the next

edition of the MEPA Monitor which will

be published on or about Jan. 11, 2012.

 

(b) Publication in the Monitor begins a 21 day 

public comment period which will close

on or about Jan. 22, 2012.

3. CZM must issue its consistency decision

within 60 days of commencement of our review

unless granted an extension buy the federal

project proponent. The review period closes and a 

consistency decision will be issued no later 

than Feb.22, 2012.

* 301 CMR 21.01 – 21.04, 15 CFE 930.41
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1128 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit States to designate 

without any mileage limitations facilities that are located in rural areas 

as critical access hospitals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 21, 2023 

Mr. GREEN of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit 

States to designate without any mileage limitations facilities that are located in rural areas as critical access 

hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Health Care 

5 Access Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1128 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDICARE RURAL HOSPITAL FLEXIBILITY PRO2 GRAM. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1820 of the Social Secu4 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i–4) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (c)(2)(B)(i)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘, and that—’’ and insert7 ing a semicolon; and 

8 (B) by striking subclauses (I) and (II); 

9 and 

10 (2) in subsection (h)(3), by inserting ‘‘made be11 fore the date of the enactment of the Rural Health 

12 Care Access Act of 2023’’ after ‘‘any redesignation’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a)(1) shall apply with respect to any designa15 tion or redesignation made on or after the date of the en16 actment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### § 1033.53 Announcement of class prices, component prices, and advanced pricing factors.

See § 1000.53.
#### § 1.203 Payment of award.

An applicant seeking payment of an award shall submit to the head of the agency administering the statute involved in the proceeding a copy of the final decision of the Department granting the award, accompanied by a statement that the applicant will not seek review of the decision in the United States courts. The agency will pay the amount awarded to the applicant within 60 days, unless judicial review of the award or of the underlying decision of the adversary adjudication has been sought by the applicant or any other party to the proceeding.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, V. Jeffrey Harrell, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB , as amended
, of Video Without Boundaries, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have;

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including any consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report, is being prepared; and

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report, (the Evaluation Date); and presented in this annual report, our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.

I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls and procedures over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control s and procedures over financial reporting.

|                |     |                                                                                   
|--------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|January 6, 2006 | By: | /s/ V. JEFFREYHARRELL                                                             
|                |     | V. Jeffrey Harrell,                                                               
|                |     | Chief Executive Officer,
President, and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer
,s*1~D S7~

~ PRO1~ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 October 15, 2014
Marcia Hadenfeldt, Library Assistant Montezuma Creek Library and BluffLibrary, San Juan County P.O. Box 99 BluffUT 84512 Subject: Request to retain public documents at the Montezuma Creek Library and Bluff

Library for public inspection Dear Ms. Hadenfeldt: The purpose ofthis letter is to requestthatthe Montezuma Creek Library and BluffLibrary retain the enclosed documents atthe library for at least sixty (60) days for public inspection. These documents are the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s preliminary decision forthe proposed Clean AirAct Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration amendment permit forthe McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation nearthe city ofAneth, San Juan County, Utah. These documents are currently available for public comment. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shaheerah~epa.gov ifyou have any questions.

Environmental Engineer Shaheerah Permits Office Air Division
Enclosures
§ 1124.12 Producer. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, *producer* means any person who produces milk approved by a duly constituted regulatory agency for fluid consumption as Grade A milk and whose milk (or components of milk) is: ( 1 ) Received at a pool plant directly from the producer or diverted by the plant operator in accordance with § 1124.13; or
( 2 ) Received by a handler described in § 1000.9(c).
( b ) Producer shall not include: ( 1 ) A producer-handler as defined in any Federal order;
( 2 ) A dairy farmer whose milk is received at an exempt plant, excluding producer milk diverted to the exempt plant pursuant to § 1124.13(e);
( 3 ) A dairy farmer whose milk is received by diversion at a pool plant from a handler regulated under another Federal order if the other Federal order designates the dairy farmer as a producer under that order and that milk is allocated by request to a utilization other than Class I;
( 4 ) A dairy farmer whose milk is reported as diverted to a plant fully regulated under another Federal order with respect to that portion of the milk so diverted that is assigned to Class I under the provisions of such other order; and
( 5 ) A dairy farmer whose milk was received at a nonpool plant during the month from the same farm as other than producer milk under the order in this part or any other Federal order. Such a dairy farmer shall be known as a *dairy farmer for other markets.*
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1131 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1131

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
 authorize the use of flexible air permitting with respect to certain 
      critical energy resource facilities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 21, 2023

 Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania (for himself and Mr. Allen) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to 
 authorize the use of flexible air permitting with respect to certain 
      critical energy resource facilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLEXIBLE AIR PERMITS FOR CRITICAL ENERGY RESOURCE 
              FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency shall, as necessary, revise regulations under parts 70 and 71 of 
title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, to--
            (1) authorize the owner or operator of a critical energy 
        resource facility to utilize flexible air permitting (as 
        described in the final rule titled ``Operating Permit Programs; 
        Flexible Air Permitting Rule'' published by the Environmental 
        Protection Agency in the Federal Register on October 6, 2009 
        (74 Fed. Reg. 51418)) with respect to such critical energy 
        resource facility; and
            (2) facilitate flexible, market-responsive operations (as 
        described in the final rule identified in paragraph (1)) with 
        respect to critical energy resource facilities.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Critical energy resource.--The term ``critical energy 
        resource'' means, as determined by the Secretary of Energy, any 
        energy resource--
                    (A) that is essential to the energy sector and 
                energy systems of the United States; and
                    (B) the supply chain of which is vulnerable to 
                disruption.
            (2) Critical energy resource facility.--The term ``critical 
        energy resource facility'' means a facility that processes or 
        refines a critical energy resource.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Randy White, principal accounting officer of Bluestone Ventures
Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Bluestone Ventures Inc., for
the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Bluestone
Ventures Inc.


/s/ Randy White
------------------------------------
Randy White
Principal Accounting Officer
April 7, 2004