alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
mm ATTORNEY GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

PRICE DANIEL 

ATTORNEY GENERAL. 

AWinTIN 11. -rExA 

November 28, 1951 

Hon. Bascom Glles 

Comm~ssi.oner 

General Land Office 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Opinion No. V-1355 

Re: Lease of minerals 

In river beds. 

You have requested our opinion as to whether 

river beds are subject to lease for mfnerals other than 

oil,and gas and the applicability of Articles 5388 to 

5400, Inclusive, R:C.S. 1925, to river beds. 

The answer to your question is dependent upon the proper constructIon of the so-called withdrawal 

act, Acts 41st Leg., 3rd C.S. 1929, ch. 22, p. 526, 

cod-l.fled as Article 5323b, V.C.S., which provides that 

"the surface and the minerals therein of all river beds 

and channels, ahd of all unsurveyed public free school 

lands. and uortions of the same. in the State of Texas. 

are hereby withdrawn from sale or lea&e untI1 other- * 

wise provided by law." (Rmphasls ours,) With respect 

to the minerals in these areas, we think the effect of 

this act was to suspend all la& then in force relative 

to their sale, lease, or development, including Article 5388, et seq., R.C.S. 1925, relative to the location and development of mlnlng claims, 

Since the passage of this act, the only law 

which has been enacted'tioncerning the leasing or other 

disposition of 'minerals in Nver beds has been'wlth 

reference to the 011 and gas therein. Art. 5421c,Sec.8-A, 

V.C.S. Until the Legislature enacts legislation providing for the leasing of other minerals, or until the 

minerals covered by~~,Artfcle 5388 et seq. are again made 

subject to disposition In these areas, such minerals 

retain their withdrawn status in accordance with the 

provisions of the withdrawal act. Therefore, we agree 

wlth your conclusion that at the present time there Is 

no authority for the leasing of these minerals or for 

the locatIon of claims looking to their ultimate development. 
Hon. Bascom Giles - Page 2 - V-1355 

; .,: 

SUMMARY 

The mineral estate in river 

beds was withdrawn from lease by 

Acts 41st Leg., 3rd C.S. 1929, ch. 

22, p. 526, pending subsequent 

legislation, which has since been 

enacted only as to 011 and gas. 

There being no subsequent legislation as to other minerals, they 

are not subject-to lease or to location of claims under Articles 

5388 to 5400, R.C.S. 1925. 

APPROVED: 

Jesse P. Luton, Jr. 

Reviewing Assistant 

Charles D. Mathews 

First Assistant 

HDP:bt 

Yours very truly, 

PRICE DANIEL 

H. D. Pruett, Jr. 

Assistant
#### GITTINGS v. RUSSEL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by J. Evans Gittings against William H. Russel.

No opinion. Motion granted. Settle order on notice.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10442 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10442

To amend title 28, United States Code, to adjust the penalty for unjust 
          conviction and imprisonment, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2024

   Ms. Waters (for herself, Ms. Norton, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mrs. 
   Ramirez, Mrs. Lee Carter, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. 
    Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Goldman of New York, and Mr. Ivey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to adjust the penalty for unjust 
          conviction and imprisonment, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Exonerees Act''.

SEC. 2. PENALTY FOR UNJUST CONVICTION AND IMPRISONMENT.

    Section 2513 of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e), by striking ``$50,000'' and 
        inserting ``$70,000''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) The amount of damages awarded under subsection (e) shall be 
adjusted for inflation annually, based on the Consumer Price Index.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
the  Company's  Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                           APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                      $184,674
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                493,879
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  40,000
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           2,115,536
<PP&E>                                                     6,175,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                             4,118,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             2,866,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      5,119,485
<BONDS>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         33,118
<PREFERRED>                                               (3,828,154)
<OTHER-SE>                                                 4,472,990
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       0
<SALES>                                                    1,916,548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              21,839
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              1,924,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           139,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (125,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  18,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (143,416)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (0.04)


</TABLE>
#### 926.7104 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 952.226-74, Displaced Employee Hiring Preference, in contracts (except for contracts for commercial items, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 403) which exceed $500,000 in value.

[62 FR 34861, June 27, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 69013, Nov. 10, 2010]
Exhibit 99(b)


                         Independent Accountants' Report
                         -------------------------------

The Board of Directors
Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer
automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust VI, Series
2000-3 has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer,
in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of
the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated August 28, 2000 (the Agreement),
as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. Household
Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the
servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and
conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented,
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has
been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in
compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of
the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated August 28, 2000, as supplemented,
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material
respects.

                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                    KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2003
<PAGE>

                              Management Assertion
                              --------------------


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, the servicing of consumer
automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust VI, Series
2000-3 has been conducted by Household Auto Finance, a division of Household
Finance Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance
Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as
set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated
August 28, 2000, as supplemented.



/s/ Tim Condon                         /s/ John O'Brien
Tim Condon                             John O'Brien
Chief Financial Officer-               Group Director- Asset Management-
Household Auto Finance                 Household Auto Finance

February 28, 2003                      February 28, 2003
------------------------------         ------------------------------
Date                                   Date
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           PPRER0S22999      

# PPRER0S22999

Flinders, B.A., (n.d.). Teenage Pregnancy Prevention: An Observational Study. Unpublished manuscript.

N/ADid not meet the review's screening criteria
#### 9904.413-10 [Reserved]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           2013 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance      

# 2013 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance

“Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2013” presents statistics and trends for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the United States through 2013. The report shows that STDs particularly affect young people, as well as gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM). The data reflect that cases and rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection are highest in Americans between the ages of 15 and 24. The report also shows that MSM now account for 75% of all syphilis infections, and that 52% of MSM who have primary and secondary syphilis are infected with HIV. 

http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats13/default.htm?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
#### Abner T. Bowen et al., appellees, v. Peter Croarkin, appellant.

Gen. No. 33,736.

Opinion filed December 31, 1929.

Rehearing denied January 10, 1930.

Edward McTiernan, for appellant; Francis E. Croarkin, of counsel. Franklin Raber, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Joseph Montalbano, Respondent, v. Maplebrook Estates, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Frank Masi, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

Order, entered on Or about August 25, 1964, vacating an order of October 19, 1963, which dismissed the action pursuant to CPLR 3404, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellants, *787and the motion to vacate denied. This action was marked “off” on the call of the calendar on October 19, 1962 and, pursuant to CPLR 3404 was dismissed on October 19, 1963. No action was taken by plaintiff from the time of the default in answering the calendar until he moved to vacate the dismissal in May, 1964. To excuse such conduct a satisfactory explanation is required (see *Diezelski*v. *Food Fair Stores,*18 A D 2d 724). The explanation offered is not only insufficient but it is unconvincing as well. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
#### Adam T. Leib, appellee, v. Lambrecht Creamery, appellant.

Gen. No. 34,701.

Opinion filed May 13, 1931.

.John dark Baker, for appellant; William L. Hart, of counsel.

H. L. Bloom, for appellee; John A. Bloomingston and Erwin H. Wright, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Wilson

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gilberto Lopez, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered November 10, 1977, sentencing defendant to imprisonment for 15 years to life, after conviction of defendant, by a jury, of murder in the second degree, is unanimously affirmed. Considering the case as a whole, and the strength of the evidence against the defendant, we do not think a reversal is warranted. However, we take this opportunity to state the following cautions: We disapprove of the District Attorney’s repeated use of the word "lie” in commenting on the defense testimony. The use of invective is particularly inappropriate by a representative of the District Attorney in addressing a jury; it militates against the calm atmosphere in which judicial proceedings should be conducted. There are other ways of telling the jury that evidence is willfully false without the use of fighting words. The District Attorney also should not have asked defendant’s character witness whether he would change his opinion of defendant’s character if he heard that defendant had committed a cold-blooded murder, obviously referring to the case on trial. The question improperly assumed that the defendant was guilty of the crime with which he was charged, the very issue toward the determination of which the character evidence was offered. Concur — Lupiano, J. P., Silverman, Fein, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           5 Ways to Pay Off Your Student Loans Faster      

# 5 Ways to Pay Off Your Student Loans Faster

This blog post, from a representative from the Office of Federal Student Aid, features advice on paying off student loans faster. Tips include signing up for an automatic debit payment plan and using tax refunds to pay off of part of a loan. 

http://www.ed.gov/blog/2014/05/5-ways-to-pay-off-your-student-loans-faster?utm_source=FindYouthInfo&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
#### 952.223-72 Radiation protection and nuclear criticality.

As prescribed in 923.7003 the clause set forth herein shall be included in those contracts or subcontracts for, and be made applicable to, work to be performed at a facility where DOE does not elect to assert its statutory authority to enforce occupational safety and health standards applicable to the working conditions of contractor and subcontractor employees, but does need to enforce radiological safety and health standards pursuant to provisions of the contract or subcontract rather than by reliance upon Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensing requirements (including agreements with states under section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act):

# Radiation Protection and Nuclear Criticality (APR 1984)

The Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions in the performance of work under this contract to protect the safety and health of employees and of members of the public against the hazards of ionizing radiation and radioactive materials and shall comply with all applicable radiation protection and nuclear criticality safety standards and requirements (including reporting requirements) of DOE. The Contractor shall submit a management program and implementation plan to the Contracting Officer for review and approval within 30 days after the effective date of this contract or modification. In the event that the Contractor fails to comply with said standards and requirements of DOE, the Contracting Officer may, without prejudice to any other legal or contractual rights of DOE, issue an order stopping all or any part of the work. Thereafter, a start order for resumption of the work may be issued at the discretion of the Contracting Officer. The Contractor shall make no claim for an extension of time or for compensation or damages by reason of or in connection with such work stoppage.

(End of clause)

[49 FR 12042, Mar. 28, 1984; 49 FR 38952, Oct. 2, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9109, Feb. 25, 1994; 74 FR 36369, 36370, 36378, 36380, July 22, 2009]
873.116 Source selection decision. ( a ) An integrated comparative assessment of proposals should be performed before source selection is made. The SSA shall independently determine which proposal(s) represents the best value, consistent with the evaluation information or factors and subfactors in the solicitation, and that the prices are fair and reasonable. The SSA may determine that all proposals should be rejected if it is in the best interest of the Government. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( b ) The source selection team, or advisory boards or panels, may conduct comparative analysis(es) of proposals and make award recommendations, if the SSA requests such assistance. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( c ) The source selection decision must be documented in accordance with FAR 15.308. (38 U.S.C. 8153)