alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
of CNA Financial Corporation
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                                                                             

Dated: November 14, 2003

| |  |  |  |                                                                         
| |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen W. Lilienthal

Stephen W. Lilienthal
Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.

117
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7743

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD LEE BUTLER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:02-cr-00823-PMD-2; 2:06-cv-01182-PMD) Submitted: April 19, 2007 Decided: April 23, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Lee Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Richard Lee Butler seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Butler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney Bailey, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 914]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J), rendered March 17, 2003, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree. He was sentenced as a second felony offender to the agreed-upon senténce of IV2 to 3 years to be served consecutive to the sentence that he is currently serving. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979 [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ivan Michael Suphal, Also Known as Michael Suphal, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 101]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered May 7, 2001, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court providently exercised its discretion in, sua sponte, before rendering its decision on the merits, reopening the suppression hearing to permit the People to present an additional witness on the issue of whether the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant *(see People v Torres,*257 AD2d 672 [1999]; *People v Colon,*228 AD2d 449 [1996], *revd on other grounds*90 NY2d 824 [1997]).

The defendant’s contention that the People failed to disprove his justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Grey,*282 AD2d 544 [2001]; *People v Hayes,*248 AD2d 635 [1998]; *People v Candelaria,*206 AD2d 385 [1994]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that the People disproved the justification defense by legally sufficient evidence. Based on the testimony of the People’s witnesses, the jury could have concluded that the defendant was the initial ag*548gressor *(see People v Carrera,*282 AD2d 614 [2001]; *People v Keefer,*197 AD2d 915 [1993]). Regardless of whether the defendant was the initial aggressor, the People negated the essential elements of the justification defense by demonstrating that the defendant shot at the fleeing victim a total of 17 times and twice struck the victim in the back *(see People v Leon,*297 AD2d 605 [2002]; *People v Hayes, supra; People v Van Allen,*216 AD2d 39 [1995]; *People v Arlequin,*214 AD2d 747 [1995]; *People v Thompson,*212 AD2d 647 [1995]; *People v Torres,*182 AD2d 788 [1992]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPLR 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contention raised in his supplemental pro se brief is without merit. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)      

# National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)

The NCVS is the nation’s primary source for information on criminal victimization. Data is reported on the likelihood of victimization by certain types of assault and by different segments of the population such as women, the elderly, and racial groups.

https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=dcdetail&iid=245
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

NOV 0 6 2015 

Mr. Phillip T. Crawford 

L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P. 

7 601 Maehr Road 

P.O. Box 154580 

VVaco, Texas 76715-4580 

Dear Mr. Crawford: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

VVe have received your petition letter dated August 5, 2015, requesting exemption from 

§§ 25.562 and 25.785(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. This exemption, if 

granted, would allow the installation of medical stretchers on Boeing Model 787-8 series 

airplanes modified for VVIP/Govermnent/Head of State use. 

This request was posted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket Management 

System (at Regulations.gov) on October 28,2015, and has been assigned Docket No. FAA2015-5056. VVe are in the process of reviewing your request. VVe will contact you if we 

need additional information. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Mr. JeffGardlin at (425) 227-2136, or by e-mail at Jeff.Gardlin@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

/J~P-tft£~ Deana M. Stedman 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
§ 1.312 Procedure where respondent does not request a hearing. ( a ) If the respondent files an answer with the reviewing official within the time period prescribed in § 1.309(a) of this part but does not request a hearing, the ALJ, upon receipt of the complaint, proof of service, and answer, shall notify the respondent that a decision will be issued under this section and shall afford the parties 30 days in which to submit documentary evidence or other relevant written information, including briefs or other written arguments. At the end of that period, the ALJ shall issue a decision based upon the pleadings and the evidence submitted, or if no evidence has been submitted, upon the pleadings. The burden of proof shall be as set forth in § 1.329 of this part.
( b ) When a decision is to be issued under this section, the ALJ shall have discretion to permit, allow, limit, or otherwise control discovery to the extent set forth under §§ 1.322 thru 1.324 of this part.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Human Trafficking Response Guide for School Resource Officers      

# Resource: Human Trafficking Response Guide for School Resource Officers

This guide (PDF, 10 pages) seeks to inform school resource officers (SROs) about human trafficking and its indicators so they can be better prepared to recognize a potential victim and know how to report a potential case. This guide includes information about: 
                  -  What human trafficking is  
                  -  How to recognize human trafficking among youth  
                  -  Tips for talking to students about general exploitation  
                  -  Building life skills that may help prevent youth from being trafficked  
                  -  Reporting options if you suspect a student is affected by human trafficking or being exploited  
                  -  Ensuring potential victims or impacted students get connected to appropriate service providers/support services  

**Learn more**(PDF, 10 pages)
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: How to Talk About Mental Health: For Parents and Caregivers      

# Resource: How to Talk About Mental Health: For Parents and Caregivers

This webpage offers tips to help parents and caregivers talk about mental health with young people. The webpage describes warning signs that a young person may be struggling and shares guidance on what to do if a parent suspects their child is struggling. Conversation starters and additional resources to support young people are provided. **Learn more.**
§ 1.802 Definitions. As used in this subpart: *Administrator* means the Administrator of the Agency administering the statute involved, or any officer or employee of the Agency to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act for the Administrator.
*Department* means the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Federal Register means the publication provided for by the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (44 U.S.C. 1501-1511), and acts supplementing and amending it.
*Hearing* means that part of the proceeding that involves the submission of evidence.
*Hearing clerk* means the Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
*Judge* means any administrative law Judge appointed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3105 or any presiding official appointed by the Secretary, and assigned to conduct the proceeding.
*Party* means: ( 1 ) Any employee or contractor of the Department acting in an official capacity; or
( 2 ) A person who intends to cross examine a witness at the hearing and has notified the person named in the notice of hearing by specified dates of his or her intent to participate in the hearing as a “party” pursuant to § 1.804.
*Proceeding* means a proceeding before the Secretary arising under a statute in which the Secretary uses formal rulemaking procedures as set forth in this subpart.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act for the Secretary.
*Witness* means any person who: ( 1 ) Has notified the person named in the notice of hearing by the specified date of his or her intent to participate in the hearing as a witness pursuant to § 1.804; and
( 2 ) Who submits written direct testimony on the proposed regulations pursuant to § 1.807; and
( 3 ) Testifies orally at the hearing.
[82 FR 51149, Nov. 3, 2017, as amended at 84 FR 51939, Oct. 1, 2019]
# C_2019416EN.01001101.xml

| 11.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 416/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 416/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

10 December 2019

(2019/C 416/05)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1077 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4731 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84073 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5565 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0922 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 134,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,1823 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,527 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 330,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2903 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,7773 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 6,4300 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6275 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4666 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6691 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6945 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5062 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 320,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4121 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7968 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4398 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 518,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6130 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,243 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,4627 |
| THB | Thai baht | 33,558 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5891 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,2903 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,5610 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1077

JPY

Japanese yen

120,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4731

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84073

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5565

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0922

ISK

Iceland króna

134,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,1823

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,527

HUF

Hungarian forint

330,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2903

RON

Romanian leu

4,7773

TRY

Turkish lira

6,4300

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6275

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4666

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6691

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6945

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5062

KRW

South Korean won

1 320,74

ZAR

South African rand

16,4121

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7968

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4398

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 518,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6130

PHP

Philippine peso

56,243

RUB

Russian rouble

70,4627

THB

Thai baht

33,558

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5891

MXN

Mexican peso

21,2903

INR

Indian rupee

78,5610

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### *Hay vs. Arberry.*

Trespass.

Case 29.

Error to the Estill circuit; George Shannon, Judge.

*Trespass. Local action. Jurisdiction. Demurrer. Judgment in bar.*

February *5.*

It is error to render judgment in bar, upon overruling demurrer to plea to the jurisdiction.

Mandate.

*Turner,*for plaintiff; *J. Speedsmith,*for defendant.

Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was a local action, brought in Estill. The defendant plead by attorney, to the jurisdiction, alleging that the supposed trespass was committed in Perry county; a demurrer to this plea being overruled, the court gave judgment in bar of the action.

The judgment ought not to have been in bar, and the court ought to have offered leave to reply to the plea.

It is, therefore, considered by the court, that the judgment of the circuit court be reversed, and the cause remanded for new proceedings.
#### § 1205.315 Marketing.

*Marketing* includes the sale of cotton or the pledging of cotton to the Commodity Credit Corporation as collateral for a price support loan.

[31 FR 16758, Dec. 31, 1966. Redesignated at 56 FR 64472, Dec. 10, 1991]