alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Elton W. Schoff et al., Petitioners, for Permanent Custody of Michael G. Schoff, an Infant, Appellant, v Joseph Hornick et al., Appellants, and Gary Schoff, Respondent.

unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Onondaga County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: In this custody proceeding between the natural father of the infant and the maternal grandparents, the court received certain reports and evaluations concerning the principals in the case. Some of the reports were held confidential by the court and made a part of the record, while others were not. In arriving at its decision it is apparent that the court placed *837some reliance upon these reports although in the present state of the record we cannot tell which reports the court used. It is also clear that not all of the reports were made available to counsel. The court erred in holding some reports confidential without the consent of the parties *(Matter of Lincoln v Lincoln,*24 NY2d 270, 273; *Kesseler v Kesseler,*10 NY2d 445; *Di Stafano v Di Stafano,*51 AD2d 885). Use of “professional reports” without an opportunity to explain or rebut material contained in the reports ”entail[s] too many risks of error” *(Matter of Lincoln v Lincoln, supra,*p 273). The order is reversed and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Onondaga County, for further proceedings, at which time all reports and evaluations which were submitted to the Trial Justice are to be made available to all counsel so that they may have the right to deal with the testimony of the psychiatrist and social worker under common-law rules *(Matter of Leon R. R.,*48 NY2d 117). The court should then make appropriate findings and render a decision based upon the existing record as supplemented by proof, if any *(Raysor v Gabbey,*57 AD2d 437). (Appeals from order of Onondaga Supreme Court — custody.) Present — Simons, J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Shavar B., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Kimberly B., a Child Alleged to be Abused and Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.) In the Matter of Bryton M., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Wayne M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 3.)

[776 NYS2d 503]

In three related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Wayne M. appeals from three fact-finding orders of the Family Court, Queens County (Salinitro, J.), all dated November 6, 2002 (one in each proceeding), which, after a fact-finding hearing, found that he sexually abused and neglected the child Kimberly B., and derivatively abused and neglected the children Bryton M. and Shavar B.

Ordered that the fact-finding orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*620A preponderance of the evidence supported the Family Court’s determination that the appellant sexually abused and neglected Kimberly B. *(see Matter of Nicole V.,*71 NY2d 112 [1987]; *Matter of Westchester County Dept. of Social Servs. [Adam B.] v Laura B.,*216 AD2d 402 [1995]) and derivatively abused and neglected Shavar B. and Bryton M. *(see Matter of Jasmine A.,*295 AD2d 504 [2002]; *Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [Douglas E., III] v Douglas E., Jr.,*191 AD2d 694 [1993]). The testimony of an expert in pediatrics, with a specialty in the field of child abuse, corroborated Kimberly’s allegations of sexual abuse *(see Matter of Nicole V., supra*at 122; *Matter of Lamarr P.,*237 AD2d 609 [1997]; Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [vi]). Evidence of Kimberly’s subsequent recantations does not mandate setting aside the finding of abuse *(see Matter of Jenna R.,*207 AD2d 403 [1994]; *Matter of Lisa S.,*187 AD2d 435 [1992]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Townes, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
§ 1.221 In responding to my demand, what conditions or restrictions may the Department impose on the production of official information or testimony relating to official information? In responding to a demand, the Department may, at its discretion, impose conditions or restrictions on the production of official information or testimony relating to official information. Such conditions or restrictions may include the following: ( a ) A requirement that the parties to the legal proceeding underlying your demand obtain a protective order or execute a confidentiality agreement to limit access to, and limit any further disclosure of, official information or testimony provided;
( b ) A limitation on the subject matter areas of the permitted testimony;
( c ) A requirement that the manner, time, location, and duration of any testimony be prescribed by the Department;
( d ) A requirement that the parties to the legal proceeding underlying your demand agree that a transcript of the permitted testimony be kept under seal or will only be used or only made available in the particular legal proceeding underlying the demand;
( e ) A requirement that you purchase an extra copy of the transcript of the employee's testimony from the court reporter and provide the Department with a copy at your expense; or
( f ) Any other condition or restriction deemed to be in the best interests of the United States.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Division of Youth Services      

# Division of Youth Services

Provides an overview of programs funded by the Department of Labor focusing on youth. Offers a bi-weekly newsletter, announcements and potential funding opportunities, information for state and local partners, as well as information on the Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership a collaborative effort serving the neediest youth.

http://www.doleta.gov/youth_services/about_oys.cfm
Understanding the Population 

of the U.S. Virgin Islands

U.S. Virgin Islands

To learn more, visit: 

census.gov/schools/USVI

0 5

1 : 85,000

Miles

2,241 10,049

6,867

5,411

8,403 2,706

779

634

51

18,481

182

WEST END NORTHSIDE

TUTU

SOUTHSIDE

EAST END CRUZ BAY

CENTRAL

CORAL

BAY

EAST

END

CHARLOTTE

AMALIE

WATER

ISLAND

0 5

1 : 85,000

Miles

St. Croix

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION

St. Thomas and St. John

One dot ( ) represents 10 people

Subdistrict

2010 Population

East End

2,453

3,091

0 0

Population

3,000 1,500 1,500 3,000

85+

80 - 84

75 - 79

70 - 74

65 - 69

60 - 64

55 - 59

50 - 54

45 - 49

40 - 44

35 - 39

30 - 34

25 - 29

20 - 24

15 - 19

10 - 14

5 - 9

0 - 4

Male Female

Age

(Years)

Age and Sex

FREDERIKSTED

NORTHWEST

4,863

SOUTHWEST

7,498

NORTHCENTRAL

4,977

SOUTHCENTRAL

8,049

SION FARM

13,003

CHRISTIANSTED

2,626

EAST END

2,453

ANNA’S HOPE

VILLAGE

4,041

0 5

1 : 160,000

Miles

0 5

1 : 160,000

Miles

Age by Estate

(Years)

48.5 or More

Less Than 16.5

16.5 - 36.9

37.0 - 48.4

No Population

MEDIAN AGE

St. Thomas and St. John

St. Croix

United States

St.

Thomas St. John

St. Croix

Charlotte

Amalie

Caribbean Sea

U.S. Virgin Islands

St. Croix 50,601

St. John 4,170

St. Thomas 51,634

Total Population

U.S. Virgin Islands 106,405

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census, U.S. Virgin Islands

Businesses in 2016

Dentists Offices

26

Fast-Food Restaurants

54

Zoos and Botanical Gardens

4

Candy and Nut Stores

1

Pet and Pet Supply Stores

2

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2016 County Business Patterns
Exhibit 32-4

Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code

The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Exelon Generation Company, LLC for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, that (i) the report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exelon
Generation Company, LLC.



/s/    Matthew F. HilzingerMatthew F. Hilzinger(Principal Financial Officer)


Date: April 23, 2009



180
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1092 

To strengthen the use of patient-experience data within the benefit-risk 

framework for approval of new drugs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2023 

Ms. MATSUI (for herself and Mr. WENSTRUP) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To strengthen the use of patient-experience data within the 

benefit-risk framework for approval of new drugs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Better Empowerment 

5 Now to Enhance Framework and Improve Treatments Act 

6 of 2023’’ or the ‘‘BENEFIT Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1092 IH

1 SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING THE USE OF PATIENT-EXPERI2 ENCE DATA WITHIN RISK-BENEFIT FRAME3 WORK. 

4 Section 569C of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos5 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb–8c) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)(1)— 

7 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; 

8 and’’ and inserting a semicolon; 

9 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

10 period and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(C) as part of the risk-benefit assessment 

13 framework in the new drug approval process de14 scribed in section 505(d), considering patient 

15 experience data submitted by the medical prod16 uct sponsor or another party.’’; and 

17 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ‘‘, includ18 ing a description of how such data and information 

19 were considered in the risk-benefit assessment de20 scribed in section 505(d)’’ before the period at the 

21 end. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### (A) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph P. J. Winter, Appellant, v. W. Cecil Johnston, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent. (B) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Michael Kane, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton prison, Respondent. (C) The People of the State of New York ex rel. Richard Lederer, Appellant, v. W. Cecil Johnston, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

[in each action] Time to perfect appeals extended 90 days.
Exhibit 99(b)

Independent Accountants' Report

The Board of Directors

Household Finance Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust VI, Series 2000-3 has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated August 28, 2000 (the Agreement), as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. Household Finance Corporation's management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting that the servicing of receivables has been conducted in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Agreement, as supplemented, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the servicing of the receivables has been conducted by Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated August 28, 2000, as supplemented, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
This report is intended solely for the information and the use of the addressee, the trustee(s), rating agencies, and others, as applicable, in accordance with the Agreement.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois

February 28, 2004

 

Management Assertion

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, the servicing of consumer automobile finance receivables owned by Household Automotive Trust VI, Series 2000-3 has been conducted by Household Auto Finance, a division of Household Finance Corporation, in its capacity as subservicer for Household Finance Corporation, as Master Servicer, in compliance with the terms and conditions as set forth in Articles IV and V of the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement dated August 28, 2000, as supplemented.

 

 

/s/ Tim Condon 
/s/ John O'Brien
Tim Condon
John O'Brien
Chief Financial Officer -
Group Director-Asset Management-
Household Auto Finance
Household Auto Finance    
February 28, 2004
February 28, 2004
Date
Date
#### Peoples State Bank of Arlington Heights, appellee, v. Herman F. Redeker et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 34,386.

Opinion filed March 24, 1931.

Rehearing denied April 6, 1931.

Benedict J. Short, Joseph Z. Willner and Hugo J. Thai, for appellants; Joseph Z. Willner and Bernhardt Frank, of counsel.

C, H. Sippel, Emmet J. Cleary and Oliver B. Opsahl, for appellee; C. H. Sippel, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries of Roxio, Inc.

June 2003



|Name                                          |  | State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Name Under Which Business is Conducted
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Wild File, Inc.                               |  | Delaware                               |  | Wild File, Inc.                       
|Roxio International, B.V.                     |  | Maastricht, The Netherlands            |  | Roxio International, B.V.             
|Roxio CI, Ltd                                 |  | Cayman Islands                         |  | Roxio CI, Ltd                         
|Roxio GmbH & Co., KG(formerly CeQuadrat GmbH) |  | Germany                                |  | Roxio GmbH & Co,. KG                  
|Roxio Japan, Inc.                             |  | Japan                                  |  | Roxio Japan, Inc.                     
|Roxio ApS                                     |  | Denmark                                |  | Roxio ApS                             
|CG1Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH                |  | Germany                                |  | CG1Verwaltungsgesellschaft GmbH       
|Roxio-MGI Holding Co                          |  | Delaware                               |  | Roxio-MGI Holding Co.                 
|MGI Software Corporation                      |  | Canada                                 |  | MGI Software Corporation              
|Napster, LLC                                  |  | Delaware                               |  | Napster, LLC
Nord Resources Corp.: Exhibit 10.18 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Red Kite Master Fund Limited

	 	Nord Resources Corporation 	A021101 
	 	1 West Wetmore Road 	  
	 	Suite 203 	  
	 	Tucson, AZ 85705 	20th March 2012 
	 	U.S.A. 	  


Dear Wayne,

We confirm having AMENDED our
purchase from you under our contract A021976 as follows:

		Quantity: 	From: 	One hundred percent (100%) of production,
      estimated at three hundred (300) short tons. 
	 	  	  	  
			To: 	One hundred percent (100%) of production,
      estimated at six hundred (600) short tons. 
	 	  	  	  
		Term: 	From: 	January 1, 2013 through March 31, 2013, and
      then renewable by mutual agreement unless otherwise terminated as provided
      herein. 
	 	  	  	  
			To: 	January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2013, and then
      renewable by mutual agreement unless otherwise terminated as provided in
      our original contract dated December 4, 2012. 
	 	  	  	  
	 	Remarks: 	All other conditions remain
      unchanged. 



	 	Buyer 	Seller 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Barry Feldman 	/s/ Wayne Morrison 
	 	 	 
	 	Barry Feldman 	  
	 	Senior Vice President 	  



	RED KITE MASTER FUND LIMITED 
	P.O. Box HM 1540, Hamilton HM FX, Bermuda 
	email: Info@redkite.bm 
	Company registration No. 35935 


1
<PAGE>


                                                     Exhibit (23)-1
                                                     Commonwealth Edison Company
                                                     Form 10-Q File No. 1-1839




                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report in this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2000, into Commonwealth Edison Company's (the Company) previously
filed prospectuses as follows: (1) prospectus dated August 21, 1986,
constituting part of Form S-3 Registration Statement File No. 33-6879, as
amended (relating to the Company's Debt Securities and Common Stock); (2)
prospectus dated January 7, 1994, constituting part of Form S-3 Registration
Statement File No. 33-51379 (relating to the Company's Debt Securities and
Cumulative Preference Stock); (3) prospectus dated September 19, 1995,
constituting part of Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 Registration Statement File No.
33-61343, as amended (relating to Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable
Preferred Securities of ComEd Financing I); (4) prospectus dated June 13, 1997
constituting part of Form S-4 Registration Statement File No. 333-28369
(relating to Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of
ComEd Financing II); and (5) Form S-8 Registration Statement File No. 333-33847
(relating to the Commonwealth Edison Company Excess Benefit Savings Plan).






Chicago, Illinois
November 7, 2000
§ 1030.31 Payroll reports. ( a ) On or before the 22nd day after the end of each month, each handler that operates a pool plant pursuant to § 1030.7 and each handler described in § 1000.9(c) shall report to the market administrator its producer payroll for the month, in the detail prescribed by the market administrator, showing for each producer the information described in § 1030.73(f).
( b ) Each handler operating a partially regulated distributing plant who elects to make payment pursuant to § 1000.76(b) shall report for each dairy farmer who would have been a producer if the plant had been fully regulated in the same manner as prescribed for reports required by paragraph (a) of this section.
#### § 1124.42 Classification of transfers and diversions.

See § 1000.42.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2014-1045

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM031AD

A300-55-6050 --- 9/11/12

A310-55-2051 --- 9/11/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### 9904.416 Accounting for insurance costs.
#### *Commissioners of the Christian Bank vs. Greenfield.*

Debt oa Case.

Case 54.

Appeal from the Christian Circuit; Benj. Shackelford, Judge.

*Variance between writ and declaration.*

Variance between writ, in case, and declaration in debt, is fatal on demurrer.

June 6.

Chief Justice Bibb,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The writ is in case, damage $200; the declaration is in debt, for $480, upon anote executed in Oct. 1819, to the President, Directors & Co. of the Christian Bank, by Greenfield.

The defendant demurred, and the court sustained the demurrer.

The case does not come within the statutes of *jeofails;*it is decided upon demurrer: there has been nc?‘ verdict of twelve *men; nor judgment by nihil diset,*
      *291or *non sum*informatus, or enquiry of damages. This variance between the writ and declaration is so total and fatal as to justify the decision of the court in favour of the demurrant, without going into the other questions presented by the record.

*Crittenden for*appellant; *Mayes*for appellee.

Judgment .affirmed with costs.