alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Model Programs Implementation Guides (iGuides)      

# Resource: Model Programs Implementation Guides (iGuides)

These iGuides provide policymakers and practitioners with 10 steps to consider when implementing a program or practice. Organized in to three general categories — Start, Support, and Secure — iGuides offer communities tips and action-oriented recommendations to help identify problems, develop the best solutions, and lay the groundwork for successful implementation.

http://www.ojjdp.gov/mpg-iguides?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
Exhibit 32-7

              Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18 United States Code

         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
     Form 10-Q of Exelon Generation Company, LLC for the quarterly period ended
     September 30, 2003, that (i) the report fully complies with the
     requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Exelon Generation Company, LLC.


     Date:  October 29, 2003                  /s/ Oliver D. Kingsley Jr.
                                              --------------------------
                                              Oliver D. Kingsley Jr.
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              President
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, V. Jeffrey Harrell, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB, of Video Without
Boundaries, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

         4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and
15d-15(e) for the registrant and have;

                  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
         such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including any consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this annual report, is being prepared; and

                  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
         controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
         date of this annual report, (the "Evaluation Date"); and presented in
         this annual report, our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
         disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
         Evaluation Date;

         5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

                  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
         design or operation of internal controls and procedures over financial
         reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
         registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
         information; and

                  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
         management or other employees who have a significant role in the
         registrant's internal control s and procedures over financial
         reporting.

December 5, 2005                           By: /s/ V. Jeffrey Harrell
                                                    ------------------------
                                                    V. Jeffrey Harrell,
                                                    Chief Executive Officer,
                                                    President, and
                                                    Principal Financial and
                                                    Accounting Officer
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 11/24 /14 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR
– 2013
- 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with the Jacksonville Electric Authority (JEA)
**SUMMARY :**  

### Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to the Jacksonville Electric 

### on October 2 8 , 2014 ; specifically, regarding JEA’s questions about how to handle and account for t heir current and anticipated out of state g eneration. 

### The Clea n Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was p roposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES :**  **EPA** Ken Mitchell/EPA R4 David McNeal/EPA R4 Keith Goff/EPA R4 Mikhail Adamantiades/EPA OAP Nicholas Swanson/EPA OAP Beth Conlin/EPA OAQPS Lora Strine/EPA OAQPS **External Stakeholders**  Bud Para/JEA Nancy Kilgo/JEA
#### § 1131.15 Fluid milk product.

See § 1000.15.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David T. Schnebley, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified by reversing that part which convicts defendant of the crime of grand larceny, first degree, and as to that conviction new trial granted, and as so modified judgment affirmed. Memorandum: There was undisputed testimony of an expert to the effect that the value of the property stolen was in excess of $500. However, the attorney for the defendant requested the court to charge grand larceny, second, and petit larceny. This request was refused, and the effect thereof was to take the question of value from the jury. This constituted reversible error. The jury could have *640disbelieved the testimony as to value and found that the stolen articles were worth less than the expert testified. This is particularly so inasmuch as the expert testified that the items as to which he testified had been valued by him for the purpose of the owners’ preparing a claim against their insurance company. We said in *People*v. *Askew*(19 A D 2d 130, 132) : *“*There can be no doubt that the lesser crime of larceny should have been charged. The applicable principle is whether *‘*there is some basis in the evidence for finding the accused innocent of the higher crime, and yet guilty of the lower one ’. *(People*v. *Mussenden,*308 N. Y. 558, 563.) ” “The power of a jury in a criminal case to reject, though unreasonably, evidence which is uncontradieted and unimpeached, and to extend mercy to an accused by finding a lesser degree of crime than is established by the evidence, cannot be challenged in an appellate court.” *(People*v. *Rytel,*284 N. Y. 242, 245; see, also, *People*v. *Seiler,*246 N. Y. 262, 267; *People*v. *Walker,*198 N. Y. 329, 334.) When, as here, a judgment in a criminal ease is correct as to one count and incorrect as to another, we have the power to sever the judgment, affirm the count on which defendant was properly convicted, and reverse and grant a new trial as to the other. (Cf. *People ex rel. Maurer*v. *Jackson,*2 N Y 2d 259; *People*v. *Daghita,*301 N. Y. 223, 228; *People*v. *Moore,*18 A D 2d 417, affd. 13 N Y 2d 1070; *People*v. *Von Cseh,*9 A D 2d 660, affd. 8 N Y 2d 993, mot. to amend remittitur granted 8 N Y 2d 1058, cert. den. 365 U. S. 817; *People*v. *Torres,*5 A D 2d 134, affd. 5 N Y 2d 804.) (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court convicting defendant of burglary, third degree, and grand larceny, first degree.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Vecehio, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Madison Explorations,  Inc. (the
     "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the  quarter  ending  September  30, 2006 as
     filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
     "Report"),  I, Joel Haskins,  Chief  Financial  Officer and Director of the
     Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
     to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2006



                                        By: /s/ JOEL HASKINS
                                            _____________________________
                                                Joel Haskins
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10318 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10318

To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize the use of physical 
or digital copies of certain certificates for certain Federal Aviation 
          Administration inspections, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2024

 Mr. Burchett introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to authorize the use of physical 
or digital copies of certain certificates for certain Federal Aviation 
          Administration inspections, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pilot Certificate Accessibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCEPTABLE FORMS OF CERTIFICATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 44703 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(m) Sufficiency of Digital and Physical Copies of Airman 
Certificates.--An individual issued a certificate pursuant to this 
section (including a medical certificate) may present such certificate 
to an inspector of the Federal Aviation Administration in any of the 
following formats:
            ``(1) A physical, original copy issued by the Administrator 
        (or his or her designee).
            ``(2) A digital copy stored on an electronic device or 
        cloud storage platform, including a mobile certificate issued 
        by the Administrator.''.
    (b) Rulemaking.--The Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall update regulations in part 61 of title 14, Code of 
Federal Regulations, as necessary, to implement the amendments made by 
this section.
    (c) Applicability.--Beginning on the date that is 1 year after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall apply part 61, 
Code of Federal Regulations, in a manner reflecting the changes to 
section 44703 of title 49, United States Code, made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lonell Logan, Also Known as Dick James, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 848]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered April 28, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of five years to life, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reducing the sentence to a term of four years to life, and otherwise affirmed.

*333As the People correctly concede, since defendant was convicted of a class E felony and sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender, his sentence should have been four years to life, the maximum permissible sentence *(People v Tolbert,*93 NY2d 86 [1999]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Lerner, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mu-Chian Chang, Appellant. Norman Wolgin, Respondent; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 653]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 6, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as an executive steward at a resort hotel and his responsibilities included approving the time records of his subordinates. Claimant was discharged from his employment after it was discovered that he was altering the times punched on his subordinates’ time cards to reflect their scheduled work times rather than their actual arrival and departure times. It is well settled that an employee’s falsification of time records may constitute misconduct *(see Matter of Kelly [Commissioner of Labor],*288 AD2d 539 [2001]). Here, claimant not only was counseled about complying with company policies and procedures, but was told by both the payroll manager and another director—who, claimant was aware, recently discharged another manager for similar conduct—that changing subordinates’ time cards to reflect different arrival and departure times was not permitted. Claimant’s denial that he was informed that such changes were prohibited and had been trained to alter the time sheets presented a credibility issue for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board to resolve *909
      *(see Matter of Sonzogni [Gilmor Glassworks—Commissioner of Labor],*301 AD2d 939 [2003]; *Matter of Trahan [Commissioner of Labor],*273 AD2d 664 [2000]). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### John Roland, appellant, v. William Ramsey, appellee.

Gen. No. 34,924.

Opinion filed April 6, 1931.

W. G. Morgan, for appellant.

W. C. Shipnes, for appellee.

Mr. Justice MeSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### GARANTO. Respondent, v. DOOLING et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 2, 1906.)

Action by Frank Garanto against John ■ T. Oooling and Andrew M. Kenlon.

No opinion. 1 udgment and order of the City Court of Mt. Vernon affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-192225, 333-192226, 333-159160, 333-143089, and 333-143088 on Form S-8 of Cincinnati Bell Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our report dated February 27, 2015, relating to the consolidated and combined financial statements and financial statement schedules of CyrusOne Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the allocation of corporate costs from Cincinnati Bell, Inc. for specified periods and the basis of presentation as of and for each period presented in the consolidated and combined financial statements), and the effectiveness of CyrusOne Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CyrusOne Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2014.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Dallas, Texas


March 9, 2015
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Summer and Afterschool Needs Assessment      

# Resource: Summer and Afterschool Needs Assessment

The Summer and Afterschool Needs Assessment helps youth-serving programs and organizations learn best practices for planning and delivering high-quality summer and afterschool programs and identify areas where they might benefit from guidance or support. The needs assessment provides organizations with a better understanding of their strengths and needs and connects them to aligned and targeted resources and guidance. **Learn more.**
#### Jean Hilton et al., Respondents, v Burke Rehabilitation Center, Appellant.

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 10, 1979, upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Jean R. Hilton in the sum of $85,000 on the cause of action for pain and suffering, and in favor of plaintiff Charles E. Hilton, her husband, in the sum of $85,000 on the cause of action for medical expenses and the loss of his wife’s services; and (2) an order of the same court, entered January 9, 1979, which denied defendant’s motion, *inter alia,*to set aside the verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs. Appeal from the order dismissed (see *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment modified, on the law, by deleting the *611second decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor a provision severing the cause of action on behalf of plaintiff Charles E. Hilton and granting a new trial with respect thereto, limited to the issue of damages only, unless said plaintiff serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $60,000. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to plaintiffs. Plaintiff Charles E. Hilton’s time to serve and file the stipulation is extended until 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be entered hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. In the event said plaintiff so stipulates, then the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to plaintiffs. The verdict in favor of plaintiff Charles E. Hilton was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.
#### 952.208-70 Printing.

As prescribed in 908.802, insert the following clause:

# Printing (APR 1984)

The Contractor shall not engage in, nor subcontract for, any printing (as that term is defined in Title I of the U.S. Government Printing and Binding Regulations in effect on the effective date of this contract) in connection with the performance of work under this contract. Provided, however, that performance of a requirement under this contract involving the duplication of less than 5,000 copies of a single unit, or no more than 25,000 units in the aggregate of multiple units, will not be deemed to be printing. A unit is defined as one sheet, size 81⁄2 by 11 inches one side only, one color. A requirement is defined as a single publication document.

(1) The term *printing* includes the following processes: composition, plate making, presswork, binding, microform publishing, or the end items produced by such processes.

(2) If fulfillment of the contract will necessitate reproduction in excess of the limits set forth above, the Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing and obtain the Contracting Officer's approval prior to acquiring on DOE's behalf production, acquisition, and dissemination of printed matter. Such printing must be obtained from the Government Printing Office (GPO), a contract source designated by GPO or a Joint Committee on Printing authorized federal printing plant.

(3) Printing services not obtained in compliance with this guidance will result in the cost of such printing being disallowed.

(4) The Contractor will include in each of his subcontracts hereunder a provision substantially the same as this clause including this paragraph (4).

(End of clause)

[49 FR 12042, Mar. 28, 1984; 49 FR 38951, Oct. 2, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9108, Feb. 25, 1994; 74 FR 36370, 36378, 36380, July 22, 2009]