alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Adverse Childhood Experiences and Life Opportunities      

# Report: Adverse Childhood Experiences and Life Opportunities

This report describes a study which analyzed data from 10 states and the District of Columbia that used the adverse childhood experiences (ACE) module in the 2010 *Behavioral Risk**Factor Surveillance System* to examine the association between ACEs and adult education, employment, and income. Compared to participants with no ACEs, those with higher ACE scores were more likely to report high school non-completion, unemployment, and living in a household below the federal poverty level. 

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740916303449?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links
#### § 1.130 Meaning of words.

As used in this subpart, words in the singular form shall be deemed to import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may require.
#### David Velazquez et al., Respondents, v Denton Limo, Inc., et al., Appellants, and Robert Granata et al., Respondents.

[776 NYS2d 874]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Denton Limo, Inc., and Esteban Nieves appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated September 26, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

This action arises from a multiple-vehicle collision in which a taxi owned by the defendant Denton Limo, Inc. (hereinafter Denton), and operated by the defendant Esteban Nieves was struck in the rear by a vehicle owned by the defendant Robert Granata and operated by the defendant Susan Granata (hereinafter the Granata vehicle). The Granata vehicle was struck in the rear by a vehicle operated by the plaintiff David Velazquez. The Supreme Court denied the motion of Denton and Nieves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. We reverse.

*788A rear-end collision with a stopped or stopping vehicle establishes a prima facie case of negligence on the part of the driver of the moving vehicle, requiring the operator of that vehicle to come forward with a non-negligent explanation for the accident *(see Shamah v Richmond County Ambulance Serv.,*279 AD2d 564, 565 [2001]; *Power v Hupart,*260 AD2d 458 [1999]; *Leal v Wolff,*224 AD2d 392, 393 [1996]; *Barile v Lazzarini,*222 AD2d 635, 636 [1995]). In response to the establishment by Denton and Nieves of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, Robert Granata and Susan Granata failed to raise a triable issue of fact by providing a reasonable, non-negligent explanation for the rear-end collision *(see Dewar v Padilla,*305 AD2d 629, 630 [2003]).

Thus, the Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of Denton and Nieves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. Santucci, J.P., Florio, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6003

CHARLES GARY SINGLETARY, III , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
WARDEN JACKSON , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 9:21

- cv - 03055

- HMH )

Submitted : May 18, 2023 Decided: May 23, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Charles Gary Singletary, III , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6003 Doc: 7 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Charles Gary Singletary, III , seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition
states a debatable claim of the denial of a const itutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Singletary has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a cer tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6003 Doc: 7 Filed: 05/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.3


                      Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350
                  of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code
                  --------------------------------------------

         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Commonwealth Edison Company for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2002, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Commonwealth Edison Company
and its subsidiaries.



Date:  August 2, 2002      /s/ Robert E. Berdelle
                           ------------------------------
                           Robert E. Berdelle
                           Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
                           Commonwealth Edison Company
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 37 (Friday, February 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 11782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03946]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Autoimmune Diseases Statistical and 
Clinical Coordinating Center (AD-SCCC).
    Date: March 23, 2021.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F52, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Margaret A. Morris Fears, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F52, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301.761.5444, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a070b0d0d030f440705181803190c0f0b18192a040302440d051c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5c8c4c2c2ccc08bc8cad7d7ccd6c3c0c4d7d6e5cbcccd8bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 22, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-03946 Filed 2-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ramon Chimelis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries V, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(C)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 13, 2009

/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
beapplicable to all proceedings commenced after the adoption hereof by theshareholders of the Corporation, arising from any act or omission, whetheroccurring before or after such adoption. No amendment or repeal of this Articleshall have any effect on the rights provided under this Article with respect toany act or omission occurring prior to such amendment or repeal. The Corporationshall promptly take all such actions, and make all such determinations, as shallbe necessary or appropriate to comply with its obligation to make any indemnityunder this Article and shall promptly pay or reimburse all reasonable expenses,including attorneys' fees, incurred by any Director or officer in connectionwith such actions and determinations or proceedings of any kind arisingtherefrom.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:86 FR 10074. PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on February 25, 2021.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING:

This meeting will also discuss: Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

* * * * *

# CONTACT FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-04167 Filed 2-24-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
§ 1.137 Amendment of complaint, petition for review, or answer; joinder of related matters. ( a ) *Amendment.* At any time prior to the filing of a motion for a hearing, the complaint, petition for review, answer, or response to petition for review may be amended. Thereafter, such an amendment may be made with consent of the parties, or as authorized by the Judge upon a showing of good cause.
( b ) *Joinder.* The Judge shall consolidate for hearing with any proceeding alleging a violation of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. 499a *et seq.,* any petitions for review of determination of status by the Chief, PACA Branch, that individuals are responsibly connected, within the meaning of 7 U.S.C. 499a(b)(9), to the licensee during the period of the alleged violations. In any case in which there is no pending proceeding alleging a violation of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. 499a *et seq.,* but there have been filed more than one petition for review of determination of responsible connection to the same licensee, such petitions for review shall be consolidated for hearing.
[61 FR 11504, Mar. 21, 1996, as amended at 68 FR 6340, Feb. 7, 2003]
#### § 1001.44 Classification of producer milk.

See § 1000.44.
CAUSE No. 2014-69512-7 11/10 /2015 6:01 :24 PM Chris Daniel .. District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 7775031 By: Phyllis Washington Filed: 11/10/2015 6:01 :24 PM CLEARMAN PREBEG, LLP, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE PLAINTIFF, V. 152ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT CLEARMAN, SCOTT M, DEFENDANT. °,~J,

### ~ NOTICE OF APPEAL 0

_ <::

_ l .:_:

.. 

### '1J . ..

- ~~- Scott M. Clearman and The Clearman Law Fi~~~LLC notify the Court of their

~- intention to appeal Judge Robert Schaffer's "Orq~ ~ Granting Temporary Injunction" 

## {)8 signed on 6 November 2015 but filed with the Dlf,~t Clerk on 9 November 2015. 

### ~r:~ ;;/ This appeal will go to either the Fir~t~F'ourteenth Court of Appeals. The appeal \"-..__.)i ' I.,. .... _ . ./ is an accelerated appeal, but it is not a ~ntal termination or child protection case. 

### :ff;,



## ..G\-·' t~ -· Respectfully submitted, 

# A~ '- \ , _

) 1 '-': :.. 

# ,:~

- ~~;, 

## ( - -ts: 

# <_~,;-~ By: /s/ Scott M.. Clearman SCOTT M. CLEARMAN /~ V ._'{7/\, .., 

## ,,~'' \~~5)

, ---~ 

### / ' ~~Qi**~~** ~",!, ' Scott M.. Clearman Texas State Bar No. 04350090 Email: scott@clearmanlaw.com The Clearman Law Firm PLLC 2929 Westheimer Rd., Suite 301 The Belle Meade at River Oaks Houston, Texas 77098 Telephone: (713) 304-9669 Facsimile: (877) 519-2800 ACCEPTED 01-15-00968-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/30/2015 11:54:00 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### I hereby certify that I filed this document electronically on 10 November 2015, and I have served it on all counsel who have consented to electronic service.

Notice of Appeal, 1 O November2015, page 2.
#### Ambia School of Hickory Grove Township of Benton County, Indiana, appellant, v. Non-High School District of Iroquois County, Illinois, appellee.

Gen. No. 7,606.

Assumpsit for tuition of pupils living in nonhigh school district. Bill in equity to same effect. Decree for defendant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Iroquois county; the Hon. Frank L. Hooper, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the June term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed September 25, 1926.

A. F. Goodyear and Robert F. Goodyear, for appellant; Otto Gresham, of counsel.

Free P. Morris, Roscoe C. South and Claude 3ST. Saum, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Gordon P. Anderson, Respondent, v Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Association, Also Known as Commercial Travelers Mutual Insurance Co., Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered October 20, 1978 in Ulster County, upon a verdict rendered at a Trial Term, in favor of plaintiff. Plaintiff, the beneficiary of an insurance policy issued by defendant, brought this action to recover $15,000 in accidental death benefits due to the death of the insured, his father. He claimed that his father, who was found dead in a friend’s swimming pool after a pool party in the early morning hours of July 28, 1975, died as a result of an accidental drowning and that, therefore, as beneficiary he was entitled to the accidental death benefits under the policy which insured against death "caused directly by and due solely to accidental bodily injuries.” Defendant contended that the death was not caused by accidental drowning but, rather by a heart attack, for which no liability would attach. The jury agreed with plaintiff and returned a verdict in his favor. There should be an affirmance. There is no merit to defendant’s first contention that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a verified transcript of death in which the cause of death was given by the coroner as "asphxia due to drowning.” Subdivision 3 of section 4103 of the Public Health Law provides that a properly certified death certificate is "prima facie evidence in all courts and places of the facts therein stated.” The cases relied upon by defendant to support its contention that such certificates are admissible to show only the fact of death and not the cause of death are not here controlling; they involved questions concerning the physician-patient privilege (see *Beglin v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.,*173 NY 374; *Davis v Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor,*165 NY 159, 163; *Buffalo Loan Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v Knights Templar & Masonic Mut. Aid Assn.,*126 NY 450), or a criminal defendant’s right of confrontation (see *People v Hampton,*38 AD2d 772). Here, the privilege is not applicable because an autopsy of a corpse is not privileged (see *Walsh v Beckman,*29 Mise 2d 591, 593) and even if it *770were, plaintiff, as next of kin to the deceased, waived the privilege by introducing the death certificate as part of his proof of death (CPLR 4504, subd [c], par [1]; *Regan v National Postal Transp. Assn.,*53 Mise 2d 901, 907). Accordingly, the death certificate was properly admitted as prima facie evidence of the cause of death (Public Health Law, § 4103; CPLR 4520; see *Gioia v State of New York,*22 AD2d 181, 184; *Brownrigg v Boston & Albany R. R. Co., 8*AD2d 140, 142; *Regan v National Postal Transp. Assn., supra).*We find no merit in defendant’s contention that Dr. Gershon was compelled to give his expert opinion against his will. Furthermore, we find no reversible error in the opening statements of the plaintiff’s attorney. We have examined the remainder of defendant’s contentions and find them to be without merit. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
#### LAWSON, Appellant, v. LAWSON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 16, 1906.)

Action by William M. Lawson against Lena L. Lawson.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 333-96625 and 333-73152)
pertaining to the VIASYS Healthcare Inc. Equity Incentive Plan, the 2001 Employees' Stock Purchase Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of our reports dated February 12,
2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of VIASYS Healthcare Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 28, 2002.

|                                          |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 21, 2003 |  |                      

---

QuickLinks
#### WOOLLEY et al., Appellants, v. HATCH, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 25, 1906.)

Action by William E. Woolley and others against Edward Hatch, Jr.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed.