alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07
- 15 - 00178
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF H .D., M.D. AND C.F., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 84,815 - E, Honorable Douglas Woodburn, Presiding



### July 1 6 , 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Lesley F. appeals the termination of her parental rights to her three young children H.D., M.D., and C.F. Her appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw, together with an Anders 1 brief wherein he certified that, after diligently searching the record, he has concluded that the appeal is without merit. A ppellate counsel , through a letter dated June 9, 2015, informed Lesley of his motion to withdraw, the filing of an Ander’s brief, and her right to file a response . Counsel further represented in the letter that he provided his client the record for purposes of reviewing and compiling a response, if she cared to. By letter, this court also informed Lesley of her right to tender

1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).2

her own response and set July 8 , 201 5 as the deadline to do so. To date, no response has been received ; nor has the court received a request from appellant, or anyone else, that the deadline be extended

. In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders , appellate counsel discussed the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s statutory findings as a basis for termination. He then explained why the evidence is sufficient to support those findings. 2 Although counsel did not specifically discuss the evidence to support the finding that termination is in the best interest of the children , we have conducted our own review of the record to uncover reversible error and have found none. 3 Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment i s affirmed.

Brian Quinn Chief Justice

2 The children were removed from the home in November 2013 because their mother, who was allegedly under the influence of narcotics, failed to pick up the two older children from day care and police discovered the youngest child , who was two
- years - old , at h ome in a dirty condition and running naked in and out of the house. Although there was evidence at the final hearing that Lesley had performed part of her service plan and ha s been drug free since July 2014 , she did not successfully complete the prerequis ites to obtaining the return of her children. The record also contained evidence illustrating that she lacked stable employment and a stable and safe environment for the children

.

3 All three children are in foster care together, they are bonded to the ir foster family, the behavior of the oldest child has improved since he has been in foster care, and the foster parents are interested in adopting the children.
#### § 1006.9 Handler.

See § 1000.9.
#### *Faris vs. Shanks.*

Chancery.

Case 23.

Appeal from the Lincoln Circuit; John L. Bridges, Judge.

*Division of the Judges. Decree. Costs.*

One J udge declining to sit in the cate and the other two not concurring, decree of the circuit court a'firmed with costs.

April 24.

Denmj, for appellant; *Crittenden,*for appellees.

Chief Justice Bibb

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

[Absent — J udge Owsley ]

This case being heard upon the transcript of the record, and the arguments of counsel, and the court, composed of the Chief Justice and Judge Mills only, (Judge Owsley declining to adjudicate upon the matters in controversy between these parties,) being now sufficiently advised, the Chief Justice is of opinion, that the decree of t»liQ circuit court is erroneous, and ought to be reversed; but Judge Mills is of opinion, that said decree is not erroneous, and ought to be affirmed. It is, therefore, ordered and decreed, because of the said division and difference of opinion, that the said decree of the circuit court be affirmed, which is ordered tobe certified.

And it is likewise ordered and decreed, that the appellant pay to the appellees, their costs in this .court, and in this behalf expended.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10505 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10505

 To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit political election or 
        contest agreements, contracts, transactions, and swaps.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2024

 Mr. Raskin (for himself, Ms. Salinas, and Mr. Casten) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit political election or 
        contest agreements, contracts, transactions, and swaps.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ban Gambling on Elections Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON POLITICAL ELECTION OR CONTEST AGREEMENTS, 
              CONTRACTS, TRANSACTIONS, AND SWAPS.

    Section 5c(c)(5) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 7a-
2(c)(5)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Prohibition relating to political elections 
                or contests.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
                this section, no agreement, contract, transaction, or 
                swap involving any political election or contest (or 
                any index, measure, value, or data related thereto, or 
                occurrence, extent of an occurrence, or contingency 
                based thereon) may be listed or made available for 
                clearing or trading on or through a registered 
                entity.''.
                                 <all>
```
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection has submitted a final revision to the 

state implementation plan (SIP) for the attainment and maintenance of the national ambient air 

quality standards (NAAQS).

The SIP revision includes:

1. The State’s reasonably available control technology (RACT) determination for ozone;

2. The 2011 periodic emission inventory;

3. The carbon monoxide maintenance plan for the New Jersey portion of the New YorkNorthern New Jersey-Long Island carbon monoxide maintenance area and changes to the 

carbon monoxide air monitoring network.

The final SIP revision also includes information on public participation, the public comments 

received and the responses to the public comments in Appendix IV.

Copies of the Department’s SIP revision are available from the Department’s web site at: 

http://www.state.nj.us/dep/baqp/sip/siprevs.htm.
§ 1001.10 Producer-handler. *Producer-handler* means a person who: ( a ) Operates a dairy farm and a distributing plant from which there is route disposition in the marketing area, and from which total route disposition and packaged sales of fluid milk products to other plants during the month does not exceed 3 million pounds;
( b ) Receives milk solely from own farm production or receives milk that is fully subject to the pricing and pooling provisions of this or any other Federal order;
( c ) Receives at its plant or acquires for route disposition no more than 150,000 pounds of fluid milk products from handlers fully regulated under any Federal order. This limitation shall not apply if the producer-handler's own farm production is less than 150,000 pounds during the month;
( d ) Disposes of no other source milk as Class I milk except by increasing the nonfat milk solids content of the fluid milk products; and
( e ) Provides proof satisfactory to the market administrator that the care and management of the dairy animals and other resources necessary to produce all Class I milk handled (excluding receipts from handlers fully regulated under any Federal order) and the processing and packaging operations are the producer-handler's own enterprise and at its own risk.
( f ) Any producer-handler with Class I route dispositions and/or transfers of packaged fluid milk products in the marketing area described in § 1131.2 of this chapter shall be subject to payments into the Order 1131 producer settlement fund on such dispositions pursuant to § 1000.76(a) and payments into the Order 1131 administrative fund provided such dispositions are less than three million pounds in the current month and such producer-handler had total Class I route dispositions and/or transfers of packaged fluid milk products from own farm production of three million pounds or more the previous month. If the producer-handler has Class I route dispositions and/or transfers of packaged fluid milk products into the marketing area described in § 1131.2 of this chapter of three million pounds or more during the current month, such producer-handler shall be subject to the provisions described in § 1131.7 of this chapter or § 1000.76(a).
[64 FR 47954, Sept. 1, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 25497, May 1, 2006; 75 FR 21160, Apr. 23, 2010]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00003-CV

In re Charlie Flentroy

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R AN D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Charlie Flentroy petitions for a writ of mandamus compelling the

district court to rule on his application for post-conviction writ of habeas corpus.

Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over post-conviction

habeas corpus proceedings. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011). Because

Flentroy’s petition for mandamus relief is based on the district court’s alleged failure to rule on

his post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus, we lack jurisdiction over his complaint.

See McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); see also In re Washington,

No. 14-09-00158-CR, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 3788, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009,

orig. proceeding); cf. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. 22.221(b) (West 2004) (authorizing courts of appeals

to issue writs of mandamus to enforce court’s jurisdiction).

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.

App. P. 52.8(a).
__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Filed: January 13, 2012

2
FILE COPY

/l-tz -2¿/-h/

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

NO. 14-0377

crrY oF BRowNsvILLE, TEXAS i

v.s

MARC' L.NG'RTA AND THE i tameron county'

BROWNSVILLE FIRE FIGHTERS' ì ,3rh Districr. ASSocTATIoN s

s

January 30, 2015

Petitioner's petition for ¡eview, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

May 1,2015

Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

**********

I' BLAKE A' IIAWTHORNE, clerk of the supreme court of rexas, do hereby certif,i

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the o¡ders of the Supreme court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered rhat petitioner, cITy oF BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS, pay all costs

incuned on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the supreme court of rexas, at the city of Austin, this

the 4th day of May, 2015.

B\*i-..-- \ . Fl,-,r-+-.,<__

Blake A. Hawthome, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
**Exhibit
      32**




**CERTIFICATION**




By
      signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of White
      River Capital, Inc.




Date:
      November 14, 2007




/s/ John
                M. Eggemeyer, IIIJohn
                M. Eggemeyer, IIIChief
                Executive Officer/s/ Martin
                J. SzumskiMartin
                J. SzumskiChief
                Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Page 8 of 20


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                        KEYCORP STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2000-B

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


Bank One, National Association             Banker's Trust Company, Deutsche Bank
One Bank One Plaza, Suite 0126             100 Plaza One, Mailstop: JCY03-6450
Chicago, IL  60670                         Jersey City, NJ 07310
Attn: Corporate Trust Administration       Attn: Corporate Trust & Agency Group
Phone: (312) 407-0192                             Structured Finance
Fax: (312) 407-1708                        Phone: (201) 593-6776
                                           Fax: (201) 593-6459

Key Bank USA, National Association         MBIA Insurance Corporation
800 Superior Ave, 4th Floor                113 King Street
Cleveland, OH 44114                        Armonk, New York 10504
ATTN: Senior Vice President                ATTN: Data Administration
Key Education Resources                    Phone: (914) 765-3772
Phone: (216) 828-9342                      Fax: (914) 765-3810
Fax: (216) 828-9301


Pursuant to Section 4.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement among Key Bank USA,
National Association, as Seller, Master Servicer and Administrator, KeyCorp
Student Loan Trust 2000-B Trust, and Bank One, National Association, as Eligible
Lender Trustee, dated as of September 1, 2000 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned
hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Master Servicer
January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2001, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made, and (ii) to the best of our knowledge, based on our
review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the
Agreement throughout such period.


                                           Key Bank USA, National Association,
                                           as Master Servicer

                                           by:    /S/ DARLENE H. DIMITRIJEVS
                                              ----------------------------------
Date: March 4, 2002                        Name:  Darlene H. Dimitrijevs, CPA
                                           Title: Senior Vice President


                                           by:    /S/ DEBRA S. FRONIUS
                                              ----------------------------------
                                           Name:  Debra S. Fronius
                                           Title: Vice President
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNavier-Stokes simulation of the crossflow instability in swept-wing flowsThe computational modeling of the transition process characteristic of flows over swept wings are described. Specifically, the crossflow instability and crossflow/T-S wave interactions are analyzed through the numerical solution of the full three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations including unsteadiness, curvature, and sweep. This approach is chosen because of the complexity of the problem and because it appears that linear stability theory is insufficient to explain the discrepancies between different experiments and between theory and experiments. The leading edge region of a swept wing is considered in a three-dimensional spatial simulation with random disturbances as the initial conditions. The work has been closely coordinated with the experimental program of Professor William Saric, examining the same problem. Comparisons with NASA flight test data and the experiments at Arizona State University were a necessary and an important integral part of this work.Document ID19900004428Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsReed, Helen L.*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1989Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-186122NAS 1.26:186122Accession Number90N13744Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-874Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004428.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Life Changes Require Health Choices, Know Your Benefit Options      

# Life Changes Require Health Choices, Know Your Benefit Options

Knowing your benefit options means knowing the basics about health care law so that you can protect yourself and your dependents. And it means finding out now about some common sense steps you can take to make sure you have the level of health care coverage you need at every stage of your life.

http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/Publications/life_changes.html
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 12, 2015 519539 

________________________________

In the Matter of EDDIE 

CHILDRESS, 

Petitioner, 

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner 

of Corrections and Community 

Supervision, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 22, 2015

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________

Eddie Childress, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M.

Treasure of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of

violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.

McCarthy, J.P., Rose, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.
-2- 519539 

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
#### § 1030.74 [Reserved]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10532 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit a candidate 

for election to the office or Representative in Congress or Senator from 

accepting contributions from any political committee other than an authorized committee of the candidate and from establishing a leadership 

PAC. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2024 

Mr. KHANNA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

prohibit a candidate for election to the office or Representative in Congress or Senator from accepting contributions from any political committee other than an 

authorized committee of the candidate and from establishing a leadership PAC. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No PAC Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 10532 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRIBUTIONS 

2 FROM PACS BY CANDIDATES FOR REP3 RESENTATIVE OR SENATOR. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 315 of the Federal Elec5 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30116) is amended 

6 by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(k) PROHIBITIONS RELATING TO CERTAIN POLIT8 ICAL COMMITTEES.— 

9 ‘‘(1) ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRIBUTIONS FROM

10 PACS.—A candidate for election for the office of 

11 Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resi12 dent Commissioner to, the Congress, may not accept 

13 a contribution with respect to the election from any 

14 political committee other than an authorized com15 mittee of the candidate. 

16 ‘‘(2) ESTABLISHMENT OF LEADERSHIP PAC.—A 

17 candidate for election for the office of Senator or 

18 Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commis19 sioner to, the Congress may not establish a leader20 ship PAC (as defined in subparagraph (B) of section 

21 304(i)(8)).’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

23 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to elections occur24 ring after 2024. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### 622.404-3 Procedures for requesting wage determinations.

The cognizant contracting activity (see 601.601-70) is the contracting agency for the purposes of FAR 22.404-3(b) and (d).

[53 FR 26172, July 11, 1988, as amended at 72 FR 45696, Aug. 15, 2007; 80 FR 6921, Feb. 9, 2015]