alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Substance Abuse Treatment Locator      

# Substance Abuse Treatment Locator

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) provides an online resource for locating drug and alcohol abuse treatment programs across the country. The Substance Abuse Treatment Facility Locator lists: private and public facilities that are licensed, certified, or otherwise approved for inclusion by their state substance abuse agency; and treatment facilities administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Indian Health Service, and the Department of Defense.

http://findtreatment.samhsa.gov/TreatmentLocator/faces/quickSearch.jspx
(January 25, 1979)

#### Juan Velasquez, Respondent, v Pine Grove Resort Ranch, Inc., et al., Appellants. (And Seven Other Related Actions.)

— Motion by plaintiffs-respondents in Action No. 5 to amend and resettle the decision and order of this court dated March 30, 1978 [61 AD2d 1102] and April 7, 1978. Motion granted, without costs, and final paragraph of decision and order amended so as to provide that the order appealed from is modified, on the law, by dismissing Action No. 3 and so much of Action No. 5 as is entitled "Azeal Quinones, Sr., as Administrator of the Goods, Chattels and Credits which were of Azeal Quinones, Jr., deceased, and Azeal Quinones, Sr., individually”, and by granting a new trial as to all other actions, and, as so modified, is affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chicago Rivet & Machine
Co. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John A. Morrissey, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John A. Morrissey
--------------------------
Name: John A. Morrissey
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 10, 2004

                                       18
#### 970.3500 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements 48 CFR 35.017 regarding the establishment, use, review, and termination of Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) sponsored by the Department of Energy (DOE).

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36373, July 22, 2009]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Behavioral Health Among College Students Information and Resource Kit      

# Resource: Behavioral Health Among College Students Information and Resource Kit

This resource discusses substance misuse, tobacco use, and mental health issues among college students. College and university prevention practitioners, health center staff, and administrators can use this resource to learn more about the prevalence and causation factors of these issues among college students and to locate prevention materials. 

http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content/SMA17-5052/SMA17-5052.pdf?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resources
#### 952.202 Clauses related to definitions.
#### In the Matter of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, v Stephen T. Mears et al., Respondents.

[775 NYS2d 581]

*534In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry J.), dated May 27, 2003, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is granted, and the arbitration is permanently stayed.

The respondents, the insureds, failed to provide the petitioner insurance company with notice of their uninsured motorist claim “as soon as practicable” *(Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Bombace,*5 AD3d 782 [2004]; *see Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v Brown,*309 AD2d 749 [2003]; *Schlesinger v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.,*294 AD2d 421, 422 [2002]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nelson Zakrzewski, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 377]

Mugglin, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, Jr., J), rendered March 4, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the third degree.

Defendant was charged in an indictment with burglary in the second degree as the result of a break-in at a residence in the Town of Northumberland, Saratoga County, on January 8, 2000. Defendant accepted a plea offer, pleading guilty to a reduced charge of attempted burglary in the third degree with the understanding that he would be sentenced, as a predicate felon, to 11⁄2 to 3 years’ imprisonment. At sentencing, defendant moved to withdraw his plea, claiming that he was innocent. He further maintained that he had a statement explaining who actually committed the crime and that unnamed individuals were paid both for their statements against defendant and to leave the state. County Court denied defendant’s motion without a hearing and sentenced defendant under the terms of the agreement, prompting this appeal.

Defendant argues that County Court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his plea without at least inquiring into his protestations of innocence. “The decision whether to permit a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea rests within the discretion of the trial court, ‘and only in rare instances will a hearing be granted’ ” *(People v Bolden,*289 AD2d 607, 608 [2001], *lv denied*98 NY2d 649 [2002], quoting *People v Yell,*250 AD2d 869, 869 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 863 [1998]; *see*CPL 220.60 [3]; *People v Lerario,*1 AD3d 635, 636 [2003]). “Generally, a guilty plea may not be withdrawn absent some evidence or claim of innocence, fraud or mistake in its inducement” *(People v Davis,*250 AD2d 939, 940 [1998] [citations omitted]; *see People v Lane,*1 AD3d 801, 802 [2003]).

*882Here, defendant made no claims of innocence during the plea allocution. Indeed, he admitted that he helped another man enter his neighbor’s premises with the intention of taking her property. Defendant also made it clear that he understood his rights to plead not guilty and to go to trial, and that he was freely and voluntarily pleading guilty. Neither during the plea proceedings nor during the four-month period between pleading and sentencing did defendant mention a statement or that unnamed individuals who made statements against him were paid. Defendant also never offered the statement to the court at sentencing. As such, there is nothing to indicate that County Court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion without a hearing *(see People v Tinsley,*35 NY2d 926, 927 [1974]; *People v Lerario, supra*at 636).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
#### 653.219-71 DOS form DS-4053, Department of State Mentor-Protégé Program Application.

As prescribed in 619.102-70(i), DS-4053 is prescribed for use in applying for an agreement under the Department of State Mentor-Protégé Program.

[69 FR 19345, Apr. 13, 2004]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated statement of income and condensed consolidated balance
sheet and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-28-1999             FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAY-31-1998             MAY-31-1997<F1>
<CASH>                               10,754                   5,385
<SECURITIES>                              0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                        60,732                  57,508
<ALLOWANCES>                              0                       0
<INVENTORY>                          55,432                  53,920
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    137,285                 124,989
<PP&E>                              394,644                 361,979
<DEPRECIATION>                      223,306                 203,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      320,782                 295,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                75,118                  72,097
<BONDS>                              33,069                  29,528
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0                       0
<PREFERRED>                               0                       0
<COMMON>                             12,497                  12,442
<OTHER-SE>                          177,264                 160,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        320,782                 295,740
<SALES>                             122,665                 114,535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    122,665                 114,535
<CGS>                                85,934                  82,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        85,934                  82,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     26,381                  24,551
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      797                     905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       9,893                   7,219
<INCOME-TAX>                          3,562                   2,699
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   6,331                   4,520
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                       0
<CHANGES>                                 0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                          6,331                   4,520
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .51                     .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .50                     .36
<FN>
<F1> Restated.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Video Visiting in Corrections: Benefits, Limitations, and Implementing Considerations      

# Video Visiting in Corrections: Benefits, Limitations, and Implementing Considerations

This guide from the National Institute of Corrections can help inform administrators working in correctional settings about the benefits and challenges of using “video visiting,” in which incarcerated individuals communicate with family members via video conferencing technology or virtual software programs. The guide includes three chapters that address: (1) reasons to consider video visiting; (2) implementation considerations; and (3) evaluation of a video visiting program.

http://nicic.gov/library/029609
§ 1.623 Will hearing requests be consolidated? ( a ) *Initial Department coordination.* If NFS has received a copy of a hearing request, it must contact the other Departments and determine: ( 1 ) Whether any of the other Departments has also filed a preliminary condition or prescription relating to the license with FERC; and
( 2 ) If so, whether the other Department has also received a hearing request with respect to the preliminary condition or prescription.
( b ) *Decision on consolidation.* Where more than one Department has received a hearing request, the Departments involved must decide jointly: ( 1 ) Whether the cases should be consolidated for hearing under paragraphs (c)(3)(ii) through (iv) of this section; and
( 2 ) If so, which Department will conduct the hearing on their behalf.
( c ) *Criteria.* Cases will or may be consolidated as follows: ( 1 ) All hearing requests with respect to any conditions from the same Department will be consolidated for hearing.
( 2 ) All hearing requests with respect to any prescriptions from the same Department will be consolidated for hearing.
( 3 ) All or any portion of the following may be consolidated for hearing, if the Departments involved determine that there are common issues of material fact or that consolidation is otherwise appropriate: ( i ) Two or more hearing requests with respect to any condition and any prescription from the same Department;
( ii ) Two or more hearing requests with respect to conditions from different Departments;
( iii ) Two or more hearing requests with respect to prescriptions from different Departments; or
( iv ) Two or more hearing requests with respect to any condition from one Department and any prescription from another Department.
#### In the Matter of Andrew Geoly et al., Petitioners, v. Charles Marks, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, et al., Respondents. Andrew Geoly et al., Appellants.

Petition pursuant to CPtLR (art. 78) for annulment of orders dated July 30, 1964 adjudging petitioners guilty of criminal contempt of court, unanimously dismissed as to each petitioner, without costs. The challenged procedures appear consistent with approved practice *(Matter of Second Grand Jury*v. *Cirillo,*12 N Y 2d 206; *People ex reí. Cirillo*V. *Warden,*11 N Y 2d 51; *Matter of Grand Jury [Cioffi],*8 N Y 2d 220; *People*v. *Riela,*7 N Y 2d 571; *People ex rel. Hackley*v. *Kelly,*24 N. Y. 74) and we find in them no element of unfairness. The pertinence of the recent United States Supreme Court decisions cited to us *(Malloy*v. *Hogan,*378 U. S. 1; *Murphy*v. *Waterfront Comm.,*378 U. S. 52) is not demonstrated. The branch of the motion seeking to consolidate the protective appeal proceedings with the article 78 proceedings is granted, and said appeals are dismissed. Concur —Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
59–010 ★ (Star Print) 

NOTICE: In lieu of a star print, errata are printed to indicate corrections to the original report. 

Calendar No. 237 

114TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! SENATE 1st Session 114–146 

ERRATA 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2015.—Ordered to be printed 

Mr. THUNE, from the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation, submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H.R. 34] 

CORRECTION

On page 4, preceeding the final paragraph, insert the following 

paragraph: 

Within the redundant tsunami warning centers NOAA has sufficient prediction capabilities, however, can provide more regional 

support and outreach through the Caribbean Tsunami Warning 

Program for all Caribbean and Western Atlantic nations and territories, and the surrounding U.S. States. The program supports this 

mission by monitoring international tsunami detection and providing warning, communication, mitigation, education, and readiness activities in the Caribbean and Western Atlantic. In addition, 

the program assists member states tsunami warning and detection 

capabilities and helps to disseminate information, including educational materials. 

Æ 

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7188

WILLIAM LEBRON ANDREW CHURCH,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Jointly and 

Severally; WILLIAM MUSE, Chairman, Jointly and Severally; KAREN D. 

BROWN, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board, Jointly and Severally; TERRY 

GLENN, Virginia Department of Corrections, Interstate Compact Coordinator, 

Jointly and Severally; OMBUDSMAN, Virginia Dept. Corrections, Jointly and 

Severally; LT. RONALD C. MAXEY, Virginia State Police, Criminal Justice 

Information, Jointly and Severally,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00845-HEH-RCY)

Submitted: January 30, 2018 Decided: February 2, 2018

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lebron Andrew Church, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Lebron Andrew Church appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Church v. Dir., Va. Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:16-cv-00845-HEHRCY (E.D. Va. Aug. 16, 2017). We also deny Church’s motion for a declaration 

regarding the constitutionality of the procedures of the Virginia Parole Board. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED