alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 52.247-66 Returnable Cylinders.

As prescribed in 47.305-17, insert the following clause:

# Returnable Cylinders (MAY 1994)

(a) Cylinder, referred to in this clause, is a pressure vessel designed for pressures higher than 40 psia and having a circular cross section excluding a portable tank, multitank car tank, cargo tank or tank car.

(b) Returnable cylinders shall remain the Contractor's property but shall be loaned without charge to the Government for a period of __ days [*Contracting Officer shall insert number of days*] (hereafter referred to as loan period) following the day of delivery to the f.o.b. point specified in the contract. Any cylinder not returned within the loan period shall be charged a daily rental beginning with the first day after the loan period expires, to and including the day the cylinders are delivered to the Contractor (if the original delivery was f.o.b. origin) or are delivered or made available for delivery to the Contractor's designated carrier (if the original delivery was f.o.b. destination). The Government shall pay the Contractor a rental of $______ [*Contracting Officer shall insert dollar amount for rental, after evaluation of offers*] per cylinder, per day, computed separately for cylinders by type, size, and capacity and for each point of delivery named in the contract. No rental shall accrue to the Contractor in excess of replacement value per cylinder specified in paragraph (c) of this clause.

(c) For each cylinder lost or damaged beyond repair while in the Government's possession, the Government shall pay to the Contractor the replacement value, less the allocable rental paid for that cylinder as follows: __________ [*Contracting Officer shall insert the cylinder types, sizes, capacities, and associated replacement values.*] These cylinders shall become Government property.

(d) If any lost cylinder is located within __________ [*Contracting Officer shall insert number of days*] calendar days after payment by the Government, it may be returned to the Contractor by the Government, and the Contractor shall pay to the Government an amount equal to the replacement value, less rental computed in accordance with paragraph (b) of this clause, beginning at the expiration of the loan period specified in paragraph (b) of this clause, and continuing to the date on which the cylinder was delivered to the Contractor.

(End of clause)

[59 FR 11386, Mar. 10, 1994]
1

Subject: FW: request for data from Physick et al. (2011)

From: Bill.Physick@csiro.au <Bill.Physick@csiro.au

> Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 10:44 PM To: Richmond-Bryant, Jennifer Subject: RE: request for data from Physick et al. (2011)

Hi Jen

Thank you for your request. I have listed the median values below. Please let me know if you want the values of the other variabl

Total 12.2Home 8.2Work 14.7Transit 23.4Other 17.4

 Cheers, Bill

From: Richmond-Bryant, Jennifer [mailto:Richmond-Bryant.Jennifer@epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 2:55 AM 

To: Physick, Bill (CMAR, Aspendale) 

Subject: request for data from Physick et al. (2011)

Dear Dr. Physick:I am writing to request the data that were used to create Figure 1 of Physick et al. (2011) “Measurements of personal e

modeling using ambient concentrations and activity data.” Atmos. Environ. 45: 2095-2102. We would like to report th

measurements in the U.S. EPA’s Integrated Science Assessment for Oxides of Nitrogen. Our first external review draft i

late November. If possible, please send me the data or let me know if that is not possible by Thursday, 7 November. Thtime and assistance!

Best regards,Jen Richmond-BryantJen Richmond-Bryant, Ph.D. | National Center for Environmental Assessment | 109 TW Alexander Drive, MD B243-01, Research Triangle Park, mobile: 919-360-1466
570.502-2 Procedures. ( a ) *Scope of work.* The contracting officer must prepare a scope of work for each alteration project.
( b ) *Independent Government estimate.* The contracting officer must obtain an independent Government estimate for each alteration project, including changes to existing alteration agreements with the lessor.
( c ) *Request for proposal.* ( 1 ) The contracting officer must provide the scope of work to the lessor, including any plans and specifications, and request a proposal.
( 2 ) The contracting officer must request sufficient cost or price information to permit a price analysis.
( d ) *Audits.* If the contracting officer requires cost or pricing data and the alteration project will exceed the threshold identified in FAR 15.403-4, request an audit.
( e ) *Proposal evaluation.* The contracting officer must— ( 1 ) Determine if the proposal meets the Government's requirements.
( 2 ) Analyze price or cost information. At a minimum, compare the proposed cost to the independent estimate and, if applicable, any audit results received.
( 3 ) Analyze profit following FAR 15.404-4.
( 4 ) Document the analysis under this paragraph and the resulting negotiation objectives.
( f ) *Price negotiations.* The contracting officer must— ( 1 ) Exercise sound judgment. Make reasonable compromises as necessary.
( 2 ) Provide the lessor with the greatest incentive for efficient and economical performance.
( 3 ) Document negotiations in the contract file, including discussions regarding restoration cost or waiver of restoration cost.
( g ) *Order.* For modifications not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, lease contracting officers may delegate alteration contracting authority to a warranted contracting officer's representative in GSA or the tenant agency. Alterations awards must reference the lease number. If the modification does not exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, the contracting officer may use GSA Form 300, Order for Supplies or Services. Reference the lease on the form.
( h ) *Inspection and payment.* The contracting officer must not make final payment for alterations until the work is: ( 1 ) Inspected by a qualified Government employee or independent Government contractor.
( 2 ) Confirmed as completed in a satisfactory manner.
[76 FR 30852, May 27, 2011]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramal Davis, Also Known as Kaleal Seifu, Appellant.

[776 *730NYS2d 818]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error co-ram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 30, 2002 *(People v Davis,*300 AD2d 673 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered November 8, 2000.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Santucci, Altman, Smith and Adams, JJ., concur.
#### 53.212 Acquisition of commercial products and commercial services.

*SF 1449 (Rev. NOV 2021), Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Products and Commercial Services.* SF 1449 is prescribed for use in solicitations and contracts for commercial products and commercial services. Agencies may prescribe additional detailed instructions for use of the form.

[60 FR 48256, Sept. 18, 1995, as amended at 67 FR 13050, Mar. 20, 2002; 70 FR 14955, Mar. 23, 2005; 75 FR 82568, Dec. 30, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 12918, Mar. 2, 2012; 86 FR 61037, Nov. 4, 2021]
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40973

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GARY SCHMUECKLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(96-CR-115-1)

- - - - - - - - - -

April 2, 1997

Before Wisdom, Jolly, and Benavides, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gary Schmueckle appeals his conviction for conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine. Schmueckle

argues that the district court erred in its calculation of the

drug amount attributable to him for sentencing purposes and that

the Government breached the plea agreement by failing to move for

downward departure at sentencing. We have reviewed the record

and the briefs of the parties and conclude that the district

court did not commit plain error in its calculation of the drug 
No. 96-40973

- 2 -

 

2 See § 2D1.1, Note (A) & comment. n.12; see also United

States v. Sherrod, 964 F.2d 1501, 1508 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

506 U.S. 1041 (1992).

 

3 See United States v. Price, 95 F.3d 364, 368-69 (5th

Cir. 1996).

amount attributable to Schmueckle. 2 We also conclude that the

Government retained discretion to move for downward departure and

did not breach the plea agreement by failing to do so.3

AFFIRMED.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Share with Youth: FAFSA: Determining Your Dependency Status      

# Share with Youth: FAFSA: Determining Your Dependency Status

Before students are ready to complete the FAFSA, they need to determine whether they will be under an independent or dependent status. This video describes how dependent applicants may need to include parental financial information.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEbxaRjlLus&_sm_au_=iVV0rj7SjrnwfMfQ&utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 39 (Tuesday, March 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12197-12198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 12198]]

amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Artificial Intelligence, Technology, and Aging.
    Date: March 12, 2021.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 
National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f89e918a8c909395b895999194d6969190d69f978e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f3959a81879b989eb39e929a9fdd9d9a9bdd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 24, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-04227 Filed 3-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey K.
Berg certify that:

1.   I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Communications Systems,
Inc.;

2.   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

|                         |    |                                       
|------------------------ | -- | --------------------------------------
|                         | By | /s/ Jeffrey
 K. Berg                  
|                         |    | Jeffrey K.
 Berg                      
|Date:
 November 12, 2009 |    | President
 and Chief Executive Officer

28

---
## NapoleonGasFireplaces: BGNV36 Page 1of 1

IDEALERS ISITEMAP Fireplaces Stoves Inserts Mantels Outdoor Tech Services What's New Company Where to BUY 

## BGNV36NaturalVentFireplace Specifications Fuel (Propane Conversion KitAvailable) BTU Input Maximum Heating Efficiency (Steady State) Mobile Home Approved

Additional Information BGNV36 Natural Gas 17,000 64% No

• No hearth extension required, saving on space in

smaller rooms • With less than 14" in depth and no need for costly

foundation or brick work, the BGNV36N installs almost anywhere in your home • Vents vertically with 4" B-vent • Approved for installations in bedrooms and bathrooms • Zero clearance to combustibles • Hot air distribution kit TESTED TO THE HEATING STANDARD ANSI Z21.50 and CSA 2.22 Features Accessories



## GAS INlET

Line dimensions are to be used as aguide only. Please consult your Installation manual for updated and precise measurements before proceeding to install or frame your Napoleon Fireplace. Check all Local and National Building Codes and Gas Regulations

Manual Brochure
I Fireplaces I Stoves I Inserts I Mantels I Outdoor ITech Services I What's New I Company I Where to Buy Napoleon Gourmet Grills Napoleon Heating and Air Napoleon Waterfalls Copyright© 2008 Napoleon® Fireplaces. All rights reserved.

## Napoleon GasFireplaces: BGNV36

IDEALERS ISITEMAP

Fireplaces Stoves Inserts Mantels Outdoor 

## BGNV36NaturalVentFireplace

• No electricity required to light or operate - millivolt

system ensures reliable use even during powerfailures • Turn on and offatthe flick ofa switch • Available in clean burning, convenient natural gas or

propane • 50% flame/heat adjustmentfor maximum comfort and

efficiency • Clear, unobstructed viewing through heat radiating

glass - 19 3/8 x 31 5/8 • Equipped with 100%safety shut offfeature foryour

peace ofmind • Realistic, ceramic fiber, light-weight molded PHAZER®

logs fora natural wood burning look • Convenient hinged doorassembly for ease of

maintenance • YELLOW DANCING FLAME® burnersystem • President's Limited Lifetime Warranty 

## Page 1of 1

Tech Services What's New Company Where to Buy Specifications

Manual Brochure
I Fireplaces I Stoves I Inserts I Mantels I Outdoor I Tech Services I What's New I Company I Whereto Buy Napoleon Gourmet Grills Napoleon Heating and Air Napoleon Waterfalls Copyright© 2008 Napoleon® Fireplaces. All rights reserved.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Gustavo GUZMAN-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40431

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Gustavo Guzman-Garcia raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. *See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano,*492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), *petition for cert. filed*(Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
803.1103 Procedures. ( a ) By use of the contract clause at 52.203-16, Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest, the contracting officer shall require each contractor whose employees perform acquisition functions closely associated with inherently Governmental functions to obtain from each covered employee a signed non-disclosure agreement to prohibit disclosure of non-public information accessed through performance of a Government contract. See FAR 3.1103(a)(2)(iii).
[83 FR 16208, Apr. 16, 2018]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 8, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20469

Summary Calendar

GUSTAVO LARA GARCIA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WARDEN SMITH; SERGEANT OLIVAREZ;

UNKNOWN, Assistant to Sergeant Olivarez;

UNKNOWN, Floor Boss; INMATE ANDRES SEGURA; MARK JONES,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 4:04-CV-152

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Texas inmate Gustavo Garcia appeals the dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against Warden Mark Jones,

prison guard Sgt. Daniel Olivarez, and others, in which he alleges

that the defendants failed to protect him from being attacked by

another inmate. The district court dismissed the action pursuant
2

to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim on which

relief could be granted.

After de novo review of Garcia’s complaint, and accepting his

allegations as true, we conclude that the actions of Jones and Olivarez establish that they were not deliberately indifferent to Garcia’s constitutional rights. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 511

U.S. 825, 834-35, 844 (1994). Garcia does not challenge the dismissal of the other defendants, so any such claims are abandoned.

See Brinkman v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744,

748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

Garcia also argues that the district court erred by denying

his motions for a default judgment, discovery, and appointment of

counsel. No relief is warranted on these grounds. See Lewis v.

Lynn, 236 F.3d 766, 767 (5th Cir. 2001); Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691

F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982). The judgment is AFFIRMED.

The dismissal of Garcia’s action pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B)

counts as his second strike for purposes of the three strikes provision, § 1915(g), because a previous action brought by him was

dismissed under § 1915(e)(2)(B). See Garcia v. Espinosa,

No. 7:01-CV-285 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 21, 2004); Adepegba v. Hammons,

103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Garcia is WARNED that if he

accumulates three strikes, he will be barred from proceeding in

forma pauperis in any future civil action or appeal filed while he

is incarcerated or detained in any facility, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
§ 1.329 The hearing and burden of proof. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a hearing on the record in order to determine whether the respondent is liable for a civil penalty or assessment under § 1.303 of this part, and if so, the appropriate amount of any such civil penalty or assessment considering any aggravating or mitigating factors.
( b ) The USDA shall prove respondent's liability and any aggravating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( c ) The respondent shall prove any affirmative defenses and any mitigating factors by a preponderance of the evidence.
( d ) The hearing shall be open to the public unless otherwise ordered by the ALJ for good cause shown.