alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6937

KEVIN FIDEL ROBINSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SAMUEL V. PRUETT, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-95-168)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Fidel Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Cauthorne Daniel,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Appellant's motion for default judgment, deny a certificate of

appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Pruett, No. CA-95-168 (E.D. Va. June 6,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BROWN, Appellant, v. BAKER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 23, 1906.)

Proceeding by the people of *1144the state of New York, on the relation of George G. Brown, Jr., against William F. Baker and others.

G. A. Logan, for appellant. J'. F. O’Brien, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
970.0371-7 Outside employment of contractor employees. Employees of a management and operating contractor are entitled to the same rights and privileges with respect to outside employment as other citizens. Therefore, there is no general prohibition against contractor employees having outside employment. However, no employee of a contractor performing work on a full or part-time basis under a DOE management and operating contract may engage in employment outside official hours of duty or while on leave if such employment will: ( a ) In any manner interfere with the proper and effective performance of the duties of the position;
( b ) Appear to create a conflict-of-interest situation, or
( c ) Appear to subject DOE or the contractor to public criticism or embarrassment.
#### WEEKS v. COE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 2, 1906.)

In the matter of judgment moneys recovered in action of Count W. Weeks against E. Holloway Coe, as executor, etc., of E. Frank Coe, deceased, defendant.

PER CURIAM.

Order' reversed, and motion .granted, without costs.

HIRSCHBERG, P. J.,

dissents.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Health Care Coverage for Homeless and At-Risk Youth      

# Resource: Health Care Coverage for Homeless and At-Risk Youth

This fact sheet describes eligibility for health care coverage, including through Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), for youth experiencing or at risk of homelessness. It also provides information on subpopulations of youth who may be eligible, services covered, enrollment, and Medicaid and CHIP income eligibility levels for each state. 

http://aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/health-coverage-homeless-and-risk-youth?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links
#### 616.000 Scope of part.

The contracting officer may use any of the contract types described in FAR part 16 for acquisitions made under simplified acquisition procedures. The contracting officer shall document his/her decision to use a contract type in accordance with the requirements of FAR part 16.

[60 FR 39963, Aug. 3, 1995]
#### 852.223-70 Instructions to Offerors—Sustainable Acquisition Plan.

As prescribed in 823.103-71, when the Contracting Officer deems a Sustainable Acquisition Plan necessary, the Contracting Officer shall insert the following provision:

# Instructions to Offerors—Sustainable Acquisition Plan (SEP 2019)

Offerors shall include a Sustainable Acquisition Plan in their technical proposals. The plan must describe the approach and quality assurance mechanisms for applying FAR subpart 23.1, Sustainable Acquisition Policy and other Federal laws, regulations and Executive Orders governing sustainable acquisition. The plan shall clearly identify those products and services included in the proposal.

(End of provision)

[84 FR 45682, Aug. 30, 2019]
606.370 Department of State standardization program. ( a ) It is the Department's policy to promote full and open competition in all procurement actions. The authority at 41 U.S.C. 3304(a)(1)shall be used with respect to standardization when only specified makes and models of equipment will satisfy the Department's needs and only one source is available. This policy applies to all acquisitions involving standardization, regardless of dollar amount.
( b ) Contracts awarded under the authority at 41 U.S.C. 3304(a)(1)shall be supported by the written justification described in FAR 6.303. The contracting officer, requirements office, procuring activity advocate for competition, and the Procurement Executive shall approve all Justifications for Other than Full and Open Competition that cite standardization of technical equipment as justification to restrict competition. The Management Officer at each post is the procuring activity advocate for competition for that post and the requirements office at post is the embassy functional office responsible for identifying the need to contract.
( c ) Procurement of specified makes and models of technical equipment and systems, for which there is only one source of supply, is considered other than full and open competition. Such procurements shall be supported by an approved Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition. The justification shall include the content requirements of FAR 6.303-2. The justification shall also address potential cost savings in areas such as inventory, operations, training, maintenance, repairs, and administrative and management support. Areas of consideration for potential cost savings shall be supported by detailed estimates as attachments to the justification. Justifications shall specify an effective period, which shall bear a reasonable relationship to the life of the technical equipment. The effective period shall not exceed six years with a review at the end of the first three years. Periodic reviews shall be made during the standardization period to determine whether the standardization should be continued, revised or canceled.
[59 FR 66756, Dec. 28, 1994, as amended at 69 FR 19331, Apr. 13, 2004; 80 FR 6918, Feb. 9, 2015]
**Exhibit 18.1**
|        | **Deloitte & Touche  LLP**  250 East Fifth Street  Suite 1900  P.O. Box 5340  Cincinnati, OH 45201-5340  USA |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | ** **                                                                                                       |
|   | Tel: +1 513 784 7100                                                                                             |
|   | www.deloitte.com                                                                                                 |

 

August 9, 2006

PSI Energy, Inc.1000 East Main StreetPlainfield, Indiana 46168

Dear Sirs/Madams:

At your request, we have read the description includedin your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commissionfor the quarter ended June 30, 2006, of the facts relating to the change inaccounting for emission allowances from the inventory method to the intangibleasset method. We believe, on the basis of the facts so set forth and otherinformation furnished to us by appropriate officials of the Company, that theaccounting change in your Form 10-Q is to an alternative accounting principlethat is preferable under the circumstances.

We have not audited any consolidated financialstatements of PSI Energy, Inc. and subsidiary as of any date or for any periodsubsequent to December 31, 2005. Therefore, we are unable to express, and we donot express, an opinion on the facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form10-Q, on the related information furnished to us by officials of the Company,or on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of PSIEnergy, Inc. and subsidiary as of any date or any period subsequent to December31, 2005.

Yours truly,
|  | Member of**Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu** |
|--|---------------------------------------|

 

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# A School Counselor’s Tips on Tying Up Loose Ends Before You Head Off to College

This blog post written by a school counselor in South Dakota provides tips for students as they prepare to head off to college. Tips include making a financial plan and ensuring credit is received for high school courses. 

http://www.ed.gov/blog/2014/05/a-guidance-counselors-tips-on-tying-up-loose-ends-before-you-head-off-to-college?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
Exhibit 12-A

               Chrysler Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
             Computations of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                            (dollars in millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                   Six Months Ended
                                                       June 30,
                                                   ----------------
                                                    1998       1997
                                                    ----       ----
<S>                                                  <C>       <C> 
Net earnings before cumulative effect of
 changes in accounting principles                    $228      $196

 Add back:
  Taxes on income                                     110       101
  Fixed charges                                       479       408
                                                     ----      ----
   Earnings available for fixed charges              $817      $705
                                                     ====      ====


 Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                   $472      $399
  Rent                                                  7         9
                                                     ----      ----
   Total fixed charges                               $479      $408
                                                     ====      ====


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                   1.71      1.73
                                                     ====      ====
</TABLE>


The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is computed by dividing earnings
available for fixed charges by total fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of
interest, amortization of debt discount and expense, and rentals. Rentals
included in fixed charges are the portion of total rent expense
representative of the interest factor (deemed to be one-third).


<PAGE>





THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
(115 App. Div. 568)

#### CORDS v. RUTH.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department

November 16, 1906.)

Brokers—Commissions—Performance of Contract.

The owner of property, after negotiating with J. with reference to a sale, gave plaintiff written authority to sell the property for a specified price, and plaintiff then negotiated with J., who made an offer of a less sum, which was rejected by the owner. Thereafter the owner revoked the authority, and subsequently, in pursuance of negotiations between him and J., sold the property for the price fixed in plaintiff’s authority. *Held*that, in the absence of any fraud or bad faith, plaintiff was not entitled to recover a commission.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 8, Cent. Dig. Brokers, §§ 45, 47.]

*1044Appeal from Municipal Court of New York.

Action by Charles D. Cords against Edward Ruth. Erom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and new trial ordered.

Argued before HIRSCHBERG, P. J., and WOODWARD, GAY-NOR, RICH, and MILLER, JJ.

Ira Wheeler, for appellant.

WOODWARD, J.

The plaintiff alleges an employment by the defendant for the purpose of effecting a sale of certain real estate for the sum of $8,500, and demands judgment for $212.50, being 2per cent, upon the purchase price. It was established upon the trial that the plaintiff went to the defendant and procured a written authority to sell the real estate in question for $8,500; the defendant agreeing to pay the commission of 2J^ per cent, upon any price which he agreed to accept for the property. The written agreement provided that the authority should"continue until the. defendant revoked the same in writing. Prior to this authority, which bears date of November 25, 1905, the defendant had been in negotiation with one Johnson in reference to a sale of this same property; Johnson representing third parties. Soon after procuring the authority the plaintiff entered into a negotiation with the said Johnson, resulting in Johnson making an offer of $8,000 for the premises, and it is conceded that this offer was rejected by the defendant. Subsequently, and on or before the 12th day of December, the defendant withdrew the authority in writing under the terms of the agreement, and at a later date entered into negotiations with the said Johnson which resulted -in a sale of the property to the latter for $8,500 as alleged in the complaint. There is no allegation of fraud or bad faith on the part of the defendant. All that he did was to withdraw the authority, as he had a clear right to do, and he then entered into negotiations with a man whom he had known and negotiated with before the plaintiff came into the transaction, and this negotiation resulted in a sale. The plaintiff never procured a purchaser ready, willing, and able to purchase the premises upon the terms fixed by the defendant, and under all of the authorities he is not entitled to recover in this action.

The judgment appealed from should be reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. All concur.
#### 9.106 Preaward surveys.
EX-4.7



 Exhibit 4.7 

AMENDMENT 2 
 TO 

HELIUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 

2016 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN 

RECITALS 

A.    Helius Medical Technologies, Inc., a Wyoming corporation (the “Company”) sponsors the Helius Medical
Technologies, Inc. 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). 
 B.    On May 9, 2017 (the
“Effective Date”), the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the following amendment to the Plan (“Amendment”). 

AMENDMENT 

1.    Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting subsection 3.6 of the Plan in its entirety and substituting the following
in lieu thereof: 
 “3.6 Delegation of Authority. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the
Plan, the Committee may, from time to time as it deems advisable, to the extent permitted by applicable law and stock exchange rules: 

(a) delegate its responsibilities to officers or employees of the Company and its Affiliates, including delegating authority to
officers to grant Awards or execute agreements or other documents on behalf of the Committee; 
 (b) engage legal counsel,
consultants, professional advisors and agents to assist in the administration of the Plan and rely upon any opinion or computation received from any such Person. Expenses incurred by the Committee or the Board in the engagement of such person shall
be paid by the Company; and 
 (c) delegate to a committee consisting of one (1) or more members of the Board the
authority to (i) designate Eligible Employees or Consultants who are not officers of the Company (within the meaning of Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act) to be recipients of Stock Options (and to the
extent permitted by applicable law, Other Stock-Based Awards), and, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the terms of such Awards; and (ii) determine the number or shares of Common Stock to be subject to such Awards granted to such
Eligible Employees and Consultants (subject to any limits set by the Board); provided that any such Awards will be granted on the form of award agreement most recently approved for use by the Committee, unless otherwise provided for in the
resolutions approving the delegation authority.” 
 2.    Except as set forth in this amendment, the Plan shall be unaffected
hereby and shall remain in full force and effect.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Riverstone Networks, Inc.:

  The audits referred to in our report dated March 22, 2001, except as to note
23 which is dated March 28, 2001, included the related financial statement
schedule as of March 3, 2001, and for each of the years in the three-year
period ended March 3, 2001, included in the annual report on Form 10-K. This
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial
statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-58736) on Form S-8 of Riverstone Networks, Inc. of our reports dated
March 22, 2001, except as to note 23 which is dated March 28, 2001, relating
to the consolidated balance sheet of Riverstone Networks, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of March 3, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended March 3, 2001, which reports are included herein.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
May 30, 2001
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# First Step: A Youth Practitioner’s Resource Guide to Supportive Services

This document, from the Department of Labor, provides information to young workers and practitioners that can help them connect young people with services. The guide contains information about programs at the state and local level.

http://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEN/TEN_31_12_Att.pdf