alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
904.7103 Solicitation provision and contract clause. ( a ) Any solicitation, including those under simplified acquisition procedures, for a contract under the national security program which will require acess to proscribed information shall include the provision at 952.204-73, Facility Clearance.
( b ) Any contract, including those awarded under simplified acquisition procedures, under the national security program which require access to proscribed information to enable performance, shall include the clause at 952.204-2, Security.
[58 FR 59684, Nov. 10, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 21976, May 13, 1996; 62 FR 42074, Aug. 5, 1997; 67 FR 14877, Mar. 28, 2002; 74 FR 36362, July 22, 2009]
8.802 Policy. ( a ) Government printing must be done by or through the Government Publishing Office (GPO) (44 U.S.C. 501), unless— ( 1 ) The GPO cannot provide the printing service (44 U.S.C. 504);
( 2 ) The printing is done in field printing plants operated by an executive agency (44 U.S.C. 501(2));
( 3 ) The printing is acquired by an executive agency from allotments for contract field printing (44 U.S.C. 501(2)); or
( 4 ) The printing is specifically authorized by statute to be done other than by the GPO.
( b ) The head of each agency shall designate a central printing authority; that central printing authority may serve as the liaison with the Congressional Joint Committee on Printing (JCP) and the Public Printer on matters related to printing. Contracting officers shall obtain approval from their designated central printing authority before contracting in any manner, whether directly or through contracts for other supplies or services, for the items defined in 8.801 and for composition, platemaking, presswork, binding, and micrographics (when used as a substitute for printing).
( c ) ( 1 ) Further, 44 U.S.C. 1121 provides that the Public Printer may acquire and furnish paper and envelopes (excluding envelopes printed in the course of manufacture) in common use by two or more Government departments, establishments, or services within the District of Columbia, and provides for reimbursement of the Public Printer from available appropriations or funds. Paper and envelopes that are furnished by the Public Printer may not be acquired in any other manner.
( 2 ) Paper and envelopes for use by Executive agencies outside the District of Columbia and stocked by GSA shall be requisitioned from GSA in accordance with the procedures listed in Federal Property Management Regulations (FPMR) 41 CFR part 101, subpart 101-26.3.
[48 FR 42129, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 52 FR 9037, Mar. 20, 1987; 54 FR 48982, Nov. 28, 1989; 59 FR 67032, Dec. 28, 1994; 84 FR 19844, May 6, 2019]
Exhibit32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report ofVillageEDOCS, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year endedDecember 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Annual Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date:  March 31, 2008                                                       | /s/ Michael A. Richard              |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|           ------------------------- | ----------------------------------- |
|                                                                                  | Chief Financial Officer             |

*ASIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHERDOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURETHAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTENSTATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO VILLAGEEDOCS, INC. AND WILLBE RETAINED BY VILLAGEEDOCS, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.*
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amendment No.
2 to Annual Report of Roxio, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wm. Christopher Gorog,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant and Nand Gangwani, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



1.  The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|    |  |                                                                                                                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    WM. CHRISTOPHER GOROG                                                                                                         
|    |  | Wm. Christopher Gorog Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)  November 12, 2004



|    |  |                                                                                                                         
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    NAND GANGWANI                                                                                                    
|    |  | Nand Gangwani Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  November 12, 2004



This certification accompanies
this periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall
not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-03-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                           2,927
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,924
<INVENTORY>                                     61,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,657
<PP&E>                                         172,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,504
<BONDS>                                         45,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,956
<OTHER-SE>                                     132,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,566
<SALES>                                        271,688
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271,688
<CGS>                                          192,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   415
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,972
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,972
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Asthma and Allergic Diseases Cooperative Research Centers (U19 Clinical Trial Optional).                    

*Date:*                         March 22-23, 2021.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G51, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Thomas F. Conway, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G51, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-507-9685,                         *thomas.conway@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 22, 2021.

Tyeshia M. Roberson,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2021-04176 Filed 2-26-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1/32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Stuart Ehrlich, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual Report of Quamtel, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Quamtel, Inc.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




QUAMTEL, INC.Date: April 13, 2012
By:
/s/ Stuart EhrlichStuart Ehrlich, Chief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officer
#### 952.001 General policy.

It is DOE policy to use the prescribed FAR and DOE contract clauses wherever practicable. Uniformity in the use of contract clauses helps to ensure impartial treatment of all contractors, expedites negotiation and contract review, and facilitates contract administration.
United States Steel Corporation

– Minntac

Response to U. S. EPA Section 114 Request April 24, 2012

**Item 18**
Provide any

test results and a description of any other work done to improve the performance of the Line 6 Low NO X Main Burner, especially for burning coal and natural gas or biomass, subsequent to what was reported in the December 1, 2011, Line 6 Lo w NO X Main Burner Final Report. **Person(s): that provided information used or considered in responding to the question or were consulted in the preparation of the response:**  Kraig Raiber , James Jarvi , Steve Londerville (Coen), Chrissy Bartovich
**Answer:** Utilizing biomass at the designed rate is the remaining challenge to resolve with the low NOx main burner. A major repair (maintenance outage) was completed on the Line 6 indurating sy stem in March 2012 where the biomass line was repaired. Included is a report that outlines that testing on the burner after the repair was completed . The report also outlines the next steps of testing with biomass. Burner work associated with coal is essentially complete. When the CFD model was initially conducted for Minntac, it was assumed that fuel bound nitrogen was insignificant and therefore was ignored. Based on the last discussions with Coen it is thought that due to the fuel bound nitrogen the coal emissions are optimized and no further burner modifications are pl anned.
AFS-14-430-E

July 13, 2015

 Exemption No. 12082

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0628

Mr. William C. Ellerbee 

Chief Flight Instructor

Falcon Aviation Academy

95 East Aviation Way

Newnan, GA 30263

Dear Mr. Ellerbee:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter posted to the docket August 25, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Falcon Aviation Academy for an exemption from 

§§ 61.35(a)(2) and 61.156(b)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the 

extent necessary to enable Chinese national citizens enrolled in its approved part 141 pilot 

school program to apply for the FAA airline transport pilot (ATP) multiengine airplane 

knowledge test, without completing the flight simulation training device (FSTD) requirements 

prescribed in § 61.156(b). Petitioner indicates that the content of its approved part 141 

training program exceeds the requirements of § 61.156(b), and it only requires an exemption 

from the 40,000 pound maximum takeoff weight requirement in § 61.156(b)(1).

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 11196 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that exempting pilots from the training requirements of § 61.156 would not provide an 

equivalent level of safety. The FAA noted that, as of August 1, 2014, completion of the ATP 

Certification Training Program (CTP) is required to be eligible to take the ATP multiengine

airplane knowledge test. The FAA found that, although the petitioner’s part 141 approved 
2

training program contains many of the elements required by § 61.156, it is not an approved 

course of training for the ATP CTP. The FAA has determined that the additional training 

required for the multiengine airplane ATP certificate will better prepare a pilot for flying in 

the airline environment and will improve safety and that exempting pilots from training that 

improves safety is not in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that —

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed 

denial of exemption; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, the petition of Falcon Aviation Academy for an exemption 

from 14 CFR § 61.35(a)(2) and § 61.156(b)(1) is hereby denied.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Albert Shaw NELSON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 07-6930.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2007.

Decided: Nov. 8, 2007.

Albert Shaw Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Albert Shaw Nelson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Nelson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
§ 1.612 Where and how must documents be filed? ( a ) *Place of filing.* Any documents relating to a case under §§ 1.610 through 1.660 must be filed with the appropriate office, as follows: ( 1 ) Before NFS refers a case for docketing under § 1.626, any documents must be filed with NFS by directing them to the “Deputy Chief, NFS.” ( i ) For delivery by regular mail, address to USDA Forest Service, Attn: Lands Staff, Mail Stop 1124, 1400 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20250-1124.
( ii ) For delivery by hand or private carrier, deliver to USDA Forest Service, Yates Bldg. (4 SO), 201 14th Street SW., Washington, DC (SW. corner of 14th Street and Independence Ave. SW.); phone (202) 205-1248; facsimile (703) 605-5117. Hand deliverers must obtain an official date-time-stamp from Lands Staff.
( 2 ) The Forest Service will notify the parties of the date on which NFS refers a case for docketing under § 1.626. After that date, any documents must be filed with: ( i ) The Hearing Clerk, if OALJ will be conducting the hearing. The Hearing Clerk's address, telephone number, and facsimile number are set forth in § 1.602; or
( ii ) The hearings component of or used by another Department, if that Department will be conducting the hearing. The name, address, telephone number, and facsimile number of the appropriate hearings component will be provided in the referral notice from the Forest Service.
( b ) *Method of filing.* ( 1 ) A document must be filed with the appropriate office under paragraph (a) of this section using one of the following methods: ( i ) By hand delivery of the original document and two copies;
( ii ) By sending the original document and two copies by express mail or courier service; or
( iii ) By sending the document by facsimile if: ( A ) The document is 20 pages or less, including all attachments;
( B ) The sending facsimile machine confirms that the transmission was successful; and
( C ) The original of the document and two copies are sent by regular mail on the same day.
( 2 ) Parties are encouraged, and may be required by the ALJ, to supplement any filing by providing the appropriate office with an electronic copy of the document on compact disc or other suitable media. With respect to any supporting material accompanying a request for hearing, a notice of intervention and response, or an answer, the party may submit in lieu of an original and two hard copies: ( i ) An original; and
( ii ) One copy on a compact disc or other suitable media.
( c ) *Date of filing.* A document under this subpart is considered filed on the date it is received. However, any document received after 5 p.m. at the place where the filing is due is considered filed on the next regular business day.
( d ) *Nonconforming documents.* If any document submitted for filing under this subpart does not comply with the requirements of this subpart or any applicable order, it may be rejected.
#### 970.0970 Performance guarantees.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00297-CR

Araceli Guzman

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1324583D)

October 29, 2015

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker____________________

 Justice Sue Walker
All data has been removed from this file as a result of CBI sanitization. All data used to determine the

cost factors for the bottom ash MDS conveyance O&M costs is considered CBI or CBI deducible.