alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

               Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

               --------------------------------------------------

I, Francis Chang, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of ELECTRONIC
     SENSOR TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company");

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
     being prepared; and

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee
     of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely
     affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
     financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls.


Date: September 26, 2006                           /s/ Francis Chang
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Francis Chang
                                                   Secretary, Treasurer and
                                                   Vice President of Finance and
                                                   Administration
#### 852.219-72 Notification of Section 8(a) Direct Award.

As prescribed in 819.811-370, paragraph (a), insert the following clause:

# Notification of Section 8(a) Direct Award (NOV 2022)

(a) Offers are solicited only from small business concerns expressly certified by the Small Business Administration (SBA) for participation in the SBA's 8(a) Program. By submission of its offer, the Offeror represents that it is in good standing and that it meets all of the criteria for participation in the program in accordance with 13 CFR part 124.

(b) Any award resulting from this solicitation will be made directly by the Contracting Officer to the successful 8(a) offeror. Although SBA is not identified as such in the award form, SBA is still the Prime Contractor.

(c) This contract is issued as a direct award between the contracting activity and the 8(a) Contractor pursuant to the Partnership Agreement (PA) between the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

(d) SBA retains responsibility for 8(a) certification, 8(a) eligibility determinations and related issues, and providing counseling and assistance to the 8(a) Contractor under the 8(a) program. The cognizant SBA district office is:

[To be completed by the Contracting Officer at the time of award]

(e) The contracting activity is responsible for administering the contract and taking any action on behalf of the Government under the terms and conditions of the contract. However, the contracting activity shall give advance notice to the SBA before it issues a final notice terminating performance, either in whole or in part, under the contract. The contracting activity shall obtain SBA's approval prior to processing any novation agreement(s). The contracting activity may assign contract administration functions to a contract administration office.

(f) The Contractor agrees:

(1) To notify the Contracting Officer, simultaneous with its notification to SBA (as required by SBA's 8(a) regulations), when the owner or owners upon whom 8(a) eligibility is based plan to relinquish ownership or control of the concern.

(2) Consistent with 15 U.S.C. 637(a)(21), transfer of ownership or control shall result in termination of the contract for convenience, unless SBA waives the requirement for termination prior to the actual relinquishing of ownership and control.

(3) It will adhere to the requirements of 52.219-14, Limitations of Subcontracting and other requirements in 13 CFR part 124 and 13 CFR 125.6, as applicable

(g) Any proposed joint venture involving an 8(a) Participant must be approved by SBA before contracts are awarded.

(End of clause)

[87 FR 63011, Oct. 18, 2022]
#### 852.246-75 Warranty of Construction—Guarantee Period Services.

As prescribed in 846.702-70(e), insert the following clause:

# Warranty of Construction—Guarantee Period Services (OCT 2018)

The clause 52.246-21, Warranty of Construction, is supplemented as follows:

Should the Contractor fail to complete the work or fail to proceed promptly to provide guarantee period services after notification by the Contracting Officer, the Government may, subject to the default clause contained at FAR 52.249-10, Default (Fixed-Price Construction), and after allowing the Contractor 10 days to correct and comply with the contract, terminate the right to proceed with the work (or the separable part of the work) that has been delayed or unsatisfactorily performed. In this event, the Government may take over the work and complete it by contract or otherwise, and may take possession of and use any materials, appliances, and plant on the work site necessary for completing the work. The Contractor and its sureties shall be liable for any damages to the Government resulting from the Contractor's refusal or failure to complete the work within this specified time, whether or not the Contractor's right to proceed with the work is terminated. This liability includes any increased costs incurred by the Government in completing the work.

(End of Clause)

[83 FR 48262, Sept. 24, 2018]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           High School Apprenticeship Toolkit      

# High School Apprenticeship Toolkit

This toolkit includes a factsheet that describes apprenticeships, how they work, and who they benefit; examples of real apprenticeships; a guide for launching high-quality apprenticeship programs; and additional resources. High schools, colleges, workforce organizations, and businesses can use this information to create and launch apprenticeship programs for high school students. 

https://www.dol.gov/apprenticeship/high-school/
#### 552.270-10 Failure in Performance.

As prescribed in 570.703, insert the following clause:

# Failure in Performance (SEP 1999)

The covenant to pay rent and the covenant to provide any service, utility, maintenance, or repair required under this lease are interdependent. In the event of any failure by the Lessor to provide any service, utility, maintenance, repair or replacement required under this lease the Government may, by contract or otherwise, perform the requirement and deduct from any payment or payments under this lease, then or thereafter due, the resulting cost to the Government, including all administrative costs. If the Government elects to perform any such requirement, the Government and each of its contractors shall be entitled to access to any and all areas of the building, access to which is necessary to perform any such requirement, and the Lessor shall afford and facilitate such access. Alternatively, the Government may deduct from any payment under this lease, then or thereafter due, an amount which reflects the reduced value of the contract requirement not performed. No deduction from rent pursuant to this clause shall constitute a default by the Government under this lease. These remedies are not exclusive and are in addition to any other remedies which may be available under this lease or at law.

(End of clause)

[64 FR 37229, July 9, 1999, as amended at 76 FR 30846, May 27, 2011]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-50360

Summary Calendar

THRESSA A. TERRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(USDC No. A-95-CV-287)

January 9, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM * :

Thr essa A. Terry appeals the district court’s judgment

affirming the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of supplemental

security benefits and disability insurance benefits to Terry.

Terry argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in his

determination that she was not disabled because she was able to

perform the duties of her past relevant work as a gift shop manager

and cashier. She contends that the ALJ failed to consider all of2

her impairments and relied on the medical opinion of one doctor to

the exclusion of all others. After thoroughly reviewing the

record, we find that Terry’s assertions lack merit and that the

ALJ’s findings are supported by substantial evidence.

Terry argues that the dis trict court erred in failing to

remand to the Commissioner for consideration of a report by

psychologist George Parker, Ph.D., who opined that Terry was

unable to perform any substantial gainful activity because of her

physical impairments, pain, and depression. The district court did

not err because Terry failed to show good cause for her failure to

submit the evidence earlier. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Ripley v.

Chater , 67 F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir. 1995).

Terry also argues that she was disa bled due to her age and

because she could no longer perform the math skills required of a

cashier. Terry failed to raise these issues in her appeal to the

Appeals Council. This court has jurisdiction to review the

Commissioner’s final decision only when a claimant has ex hausted

her administrative remedies. Paul v. Shalala

, 29 F.3d 208, 210

(5th. Cir. 1994). Terry’s failure to raise these issues before the

Appeals Council deprives this court of jurisdiction to review them.

See id . These claims are dismissed for want of jurisdiction

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
#### RUBINSTEIN v. ROSENTHAL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Louis Bubinstein against Samuel Bosenthal.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order signed,
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)      

# Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

The Wage and Hours Division of the Department of Labor provides information to help clarify the rules and restrictions for youth employment under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This page consists of an overview of the FLSA as well as a page with resources about child labor specifically. 

http://www.dol.gov/whd/flsa/
#### 619.705-6 Postaward responsibilities of the contracting officer.
#### In the Matter of Anthony N. Bianca, Petitioner, v Louis J. Frank, as Commissioner of Police of Nassau County, et al., Respondents.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of Police of Nassau County, dated February 27, 1975, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner guilty of certain charges and dismissed him from his position as a police officer. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is modified, on the law, by reducing the penalty of dismissal to a fine of 30 days’ pay. As so modified, determination confirmed and petition otherwise dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The respondents are directed to pay the petitioner back wages less (1) the amount of compensation which he may have earned in other employment or occupation during the period of his dismissal and (2) any wages resulting from a delay in the proceeding for which he was responsible (cf. *Matter of Yeampierre v Gutman,*52 AD2d 608). The determination insofar as it found petitoner guilty of certain charges was supported by substantial evidence but the penalty of dismissal from service was so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 233-234). We have considered petitioner’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Share with Youth: TA Series for Youth Practitioners      

# Share with Youth: TA Series for Youth Practitioners

This technical assistance (TA) series will provide webinars, podcasts, conference calls, and videos for youth practitioners focusing on various Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act youth-related topics. 

http://youth.workforcegps.org/announcements/2017/08/24/11/21/It-sComing?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Share-with-Youth
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(i)

CLARCOR INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      We hereby certify that the accompanying Report of CLARCOR Inc. on Form
10-Q for the six months ended May 29, 2004 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of CLARCOR Inc.

          /s/ Norman E. Johnson                       /s/ Bruce A. Klein
------------------------------------------    ----------------------------------
            Norman E. Johnson                           Bruce A. Klein
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief    Vice President - Finance and Chief
            Executive Officer                         Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6654

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 00-6949

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting

by designation. (CA-96-111-DKC)

Submitted: September 20, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000
2

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se. Tamera Lynn Fine, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Hollis Raphael

Weisman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although two of the district court orders are marked as

filed on April 28 and June 29, the district court’s records show

that the April 28 order was entered on the docket sheet on May 1

and the June 29 order was entered on the docket sheet on July 13.

Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the orders were entered on the docket

sheet that we take as the effective dates of the district court’s

decisions. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir.

1986).

3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Michael Joseph Sindram appeals

district court orders denying his request to transfer the case to

another district court, denying his request for stamped envelopes,

serving upon him several Government filings, granting the United

States’ request for a writ of garnishment and ordering the Garnishee United States Postal Service to pay over to the United States

funds and bonds seized during a search of Sindram’s home, and denying his motion for clarification and modification and for recusal.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Sindram, No. CR-96-

111-DKC; CA-96-111-DKC (D. Md. May 1 & June 30 & July 13, 2000).*

We deny Sindram’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED