alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(December 27, 1966)

#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Graziolo, Respondent, v. United States Freight Custom Cartage Company et al., Appellants, and Special Funds Conservation Committee, Respondent. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Staley, Jr., J.

Appeal by the employer and its insurance carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The claimant was employed by the assured as a tractor-trailer driver, and had been so employed for 18 years, when, on December 26, 1962, he injured his back and left shoulder while picking up a carton weighing about 200 pounds. Surgery for a herniated disc was performed on April 17, 1963. The claimant, who was 55 years of age at the time of the injury, evidently never returned to work. On October 17, 1965, he was found to have a permanent partial disability, and a compensation award was made. The carrier filed a claim for reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund on August 21, 1963, alleging a prior physical impairment as a result of a left nephrectomy performed on March 26, 1958, and prior back injuries in the same employment on October 15,1956, March 7,1958 and June 28, 1960. The Workmen’s Compensation Board found that the employer had knowledge of a pre-existing permanent physical impairment, but discharged the Special Disability Fund upon its finding that “the disability by reason of the pre-existing back injuries did not result in a materially and substantially greater disability than that which would have resulted from the accident of December 26, 1962 alone.” The appellants contend that the medical evidence fails to sustain the findings of the board. It was determined that the employer had knowledge of the pre-existing back injuries. There is no evidence or finding of knowledge on the part of the employer with respect to the kidney condition. The medical testimony, on which the appellants rely, consists solely of testimony in regard to a permanent disability as a result of the removal of the left kidney. To assess liability against the Special Disability Fund, it must be established that the employer had knowledge of the pre-existing permanent disability. *(Matter of Drews*v. *Blue Ribbon Fish Co.,*23 A D 2d 927.) Substantial evidence exists in the record to the effect that the prior back injuries played no part in the disability, as a result of the December 26, 1962 accident. The findings of the board are sustained by substantial evidence in the record. Decision affirmed, with costs to Special Disability Fund against appellants. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur with Staley, Jr., J.
EXHIBIT 15








November 9, 1999









Ohio Edison Company
76 South Main Street
Akron, OH  44308

Gentlemen:

We are aware that Ohio Edison Company has incorporated by reference in
its Registration Statements No. 33-49135, No. 33-49259, No. 33-49413,
No. 33-51139, No. 333-01489 and No. 333-05277 its Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1999, which includes our report dated
November 9, 1999 covering the unaudited interim financial information
contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of
1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration
statements prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or
certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
Act.

                               Very truly yours,




                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Current Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students — United States, 2011

As illustrated in this report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, data from the 2011 National Youth Tobacco Survey reveals that during 2000–2011, there was a linear downward trend observed in the prevalence of current tobacco use, current combustible tobacco use, and current cigarette use among middle and high school students.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6131a1.htm?s_cid=mm6131a1_w
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice: Schools and Special Education      

# Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice: Schools and Special Education

Resources on how to foster collaboration and implement best practices in school and special education settings.

https://www.air.org/project/center-effective-collaboration-and-practice-cecp
570.105-2 Criteria for the use of two-phase design-build. The contracting officer may use the two-phase design-build selection procedures in 41 U.S.C. 253m for lease construction projects. This includes lease construction projects with options to purchase the real property leased. Use the procedures in 41 U.S.C. 253m and FAR 36.3 when the conditions in (a) and (b) below are met: ( a ) The contracting officer anticipates that the lease will involve the design and construction of a building, facility, or work for lease to the Government.
( b ) The contracting officer determines whether the procedures are appropriate for entering into a lease construction contract based on the following: ( 1 ) The contracting officer expects to receive three or more offers.
( 2 ) Offerors will need to perform design work before developing a price.
( 3 ) Offerors will incur a substantial amount of expense in preparing offers.
( 4 ) The contracting officer considers criteria such as the following: ( i ) The extent to which the project requirements have been adequately defined.
( ii ) The time constraints for delivery of the project.
( iii ) The capability and experience of potential contractors.
( iv ) The past performance of potential contractors.
( v ) The suitability of the project for use of the two-phase selection procedures.
( vi ) The capability of the agency to manage the two-phase selection process.
( vii ) Other criteria established by the HCA.
( c ) See 570.305 for additional information.
[64 FR 37265, July 9, 1999, as amended at 76 FR 30849, May 27, 2011]
#### Ana Jiminez, by Her Mother and Natural Guardian, Andrea Jiminez, et al., Respondents, v City of New York, Defendant, and New York City Housing Authority, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 530]

*269Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Norman C. Ryp, J.), entered November 26, 2002, after a jury trial, in an action by an infant for personal injuries caused by lead paint in defendant-appellant’s premises, awarding plaintiff prestructured damages in the principal amounts of $75,000 for past pain and suffering, $360,000 for future pain and suffering over 30 years, $72,000 for future speech therapy over six years, $120,000 for future tutoring over six years, $56,160 for future psychotherapy over nine years, and $112,000 for loss of earning potential over 28 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to rebut the presumption in Local Law No. 1 (1982) of the City of New York “that, in any building erected prior to 1960, peeling paint in a dwelling unit occupied by a child six years of age or under comprises a hazardous lead condition” (J*uarez v Wavecrest Mgt. Team,*88 NY2d 628, 647 [1996]). Given the presumption, it was defendant’s burden to show the absence of hazard, not plaintiff’s to show its existence *(cf. Woolfalk v New York City Hous. Auth.,*263 AD2d 355 [1999]). Thus, it does not avail defendant to argue that plaintiff’s expert’s tests failed to show the existence of a dangerous level of lead in the apartment. In any event, defendant’s evidence to that effect at best raised only issues of expert credibility as to whether the tests were properly performed and interpreted, which issues were properly submitted to the jury *(see Mejia v JMM Audubon,*1 AD3d 261 [2003]). A fair interpretation of the evidence, including, in particular, the testimony of plaintiff’s expert neurologist, also supports a finding that even if the assertedly unreliable fingerstiek test were disregarded, the level of lead in plaintiffs blood was high enough to cause the injuries she suffered *(see Seay v Greenidge,*292 AD2d 173 [2002]). The damage awards are not against the weight of the evidence and do not deviate materially from what is reasonable compensation *(cf id.; Sampson v New York City Hous. Auth.,*256 AD2d 19 [1998]). We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Ellerin, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Heads Up PSA      

# Heads Up PSA

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention created this PSA, featuring Super Bowl MVP Kurt Warner, to educate parents, kids, and teens about concussion and serious brain injury. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6JKefMA0WA&feature=youtu.be
#### In the Matter of Carlos Lozada, Appellant, v Frances Pinto, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 860]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, in which the father alleged a violation of his visitation rights, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Fitzmaurice, J.), dated January 11, 2002, as, in effect, vacated two orders of the Family Court, Queens County (Friedman, J.), both dated December 4, 1997, which, inter alia, awarded him visitation rights with two of his children, Carlos and Frank.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as relates to Carlos is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court can direct visitation only with minor children, who are defined under the Family Court Act as “person[s] who [have] not attained the age of eighteen years” (Family Ct Act § 119 [c]; § 651). Since Carlos is now over the age of 18, he is no longer subject to an order directing visitation *(see Jabri v Jabri,*193 AD2d 782, 784 [1993]; *Matter of Hughes v Wiegman,*150 AD2d 449 [1989]; *Matter of Eric L. v Dorothy L.,*130 AD2d 660, 661 [1987]). Thus, the appeal from so much of the order as relates to Carlos must be dismissed as academic.

The Family Court properly determined that under the circumstances, visitation with the father, who is incarcerated, would not be in Frank’s best interests *(see Matter of Davis v Davis,*232 AD2d 773 [1996]; *Matter of Simpson v Finnigan,*202 AD2d 592, 593 [1994]; *Matter of Patsy M.C. v Lorna W.C.,*165 AD2d 813 [1990]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
# C_2020164EN.01001601.xml

| 13.5.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/16

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

12 May 2020

(2020/C 164/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0858 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4577 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87773 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5968 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0520 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 158,70 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,0518 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,423 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 350,75 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5449 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8301 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,5979 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6625 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5178 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4154 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7742 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5357 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 326,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,7382 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6933 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5653 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 073,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6977 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,388 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 79,4157 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,854 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,2708 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 25,8251 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,5930 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0858

JPY

Japanese yen

116,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4577

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87773

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5968

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0520

ISK

Iceland króna

158,70

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,0518

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,423

HUF

Hungarian forint

350,75

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5449

RON

Romanian leu

4,8301

TRY

Turkish lira

7,5979

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6625

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5178

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4154

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7742

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5357

KRW

South Korean won

1 326,17

ZAR

South African rand

19,7382

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6933

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5653

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 073,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6977

PHP

Philippine peso

54,388

RUB

Russian rouble

79,4157

THB

Thai baht

34,854

BRL

Brazilian real

6,2708

MXN

Mexican peso

25,8251

INR

Indian rupee

81,5930

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
#### 970.3501-4 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 970.5235-1, Federally Funded Research and Development Center Sponsoring Agreement, in all solicitations and contracts for the management and operation of an FFRDC sponsored by the Department of Energy.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36373, July 22, 2009]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           The Challenge      

# The Challenge

A principal vehicle by which OSDFS communicates with the field, and provides information on research-based activities, best practices, and other information related to effective drug abuse and violence prevention strategies.

http://www.thechallenge.org
### The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the District of Minnesota. ___________ No. 96-1083

___________ John R. Stoebner, Trustee * for the Bankruptcy Estate * of T.G. Morgan, Inc., * * Appeal from the United States Appellee, * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Michael W. Blodgett, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 26, 1996 Filed: October 4, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Mi chael W. Blodgett appeals from the district court's grant o f 1 summaryjudgment to John Stoebner, trustee for the bankruptcy estate o f T.G. Morgan, Inc. Ha ving thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the judgment of the district court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
819.201 General policy. ( a ) It is VA policy that small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans shall have maximum practicable opportunity to participate in VA acquisitions, consistent the priorities and preferences prescribed under the Veterans First Contracting Program in subpart 819.70. ( 1 ) To carry out this policy the Secretary shall establish annual SDVOSB and VOSB contracting goals.
( 2 ) In support of these goals, each administration and staff office shall in turn establish annual goals for each subordinate contracting activity that present, for that activity, the maximum practicable opportunity for small business concerns, and particularly SDVOSBs/VOSBs, to participate in the performance of the activity's contracts and subcontracts.
( 3 ) The attainment of these goals or the use of interagency acquisition vehicles does not limit the applicability of the Veterans First Contracting Program and priorities in subpart 819.70.
( c ) In addition to the duties and responsibilities in FAR 19.201(c), the Executive Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU), is responsible for overseeing implementation of the Veterans First Contracting Program under subpart 819.70.
( d ) Each organization with contracting authority shall designate small business specialists/technical advisors in coordination with the OSDBU Director.