24610 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2016 / Notices 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0163; FRL–9944–95] 

Amendments, Extensions, and/or 

Issuances of Experimental Use Permits 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: EPA has granted 

amendments, extensions, and/or 

issuances of experimental use permits 

(EUPs) to the pesticide applicants 

described in Unit II of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. An EUP 

permits use of a pesticide for 

experimental or research purposes only 

in accordance with the limitations in 

the permit. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert McNally, Biopesticides and 

Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), 

Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general. Although this action may be 

of particular interest to those persons 

who conduct or sponsor research on 

pesticides, EPA has not attempted to 

describe all the specific entities that 

may be affected by this action. 

B. How can I get copies of this document 

and other related information? 

The dockets for these actions, 

identified by the docket identification 

(ID) numbers as shown in the body of 

this document, are available at http://

www.regulations.gov or at the Office of 

Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public 

Docket (OPP Docket) in the 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. EUPs 

EPA has issued the following EUPs: 

1. 8917–EUP–2. (EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2015–0516). Amendment and 

Extension. J.R. Simplot Co., 5369 W. 

Irving St., Boise, ID 83706. This EUP 

allows the use of 13,000,000 pounds of 

seed potatoes containing 0.390 pound of 

VNT1 protein (or 3.90 × 10¥1 pound of 

VNT1 protein) on 5,576 acres (i.e., 5,200 

Rpi-vnt1 plant-incorporated protectant 

(PIP) acres and 376 maximum border 

acres) to evaluate resistance to 

Phytophthora infestans (commonly 

known as late potato blight). The 

program is authorized only in the states 

of Arizona, California, Colorado, 

Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, 

Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, 

Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New 

Mexico, New York, North Carolina, 

North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, 

South Carolina, Texas, Utah, 

Washington, and Wisconsin. The EUP is 

effective from December 17, 2015, to 

April 1, 2017. 

2. 62719–EUP–66. (EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2014–0521). Amendment and 

Extension. Dow AgroSciences, LLC, 

9330 Zionsville Rd., Indianapolis, IN 

46268–1054. This EUP allows the use of 

8.509 pounds of active ingredient 

(0.399, 0.120, 9.364 × 10¥7, 0.448, 6.22, 

0.152, and 1.17 pounds of Bacillus 

thuringiensis (Bt) Cry1A.105 protein, Bt 

Cry2Ab2 protein, DvSnf7 doublestranded RNA (dsRNA), Bt Cry1F 

protein, Bt Cry34Ab1 protein, Bt 

Cry35Ab1 protein, and Bt Cry3Bb1 

protein, respectively) in 456,699 pounds 

of corn seed and involves 5,844 acres 

(i.e., 2,660 PIP acres, 1,312 non-PIP 

acres, and 1,872 border acres) for inbred 

and hybrid development, nursery 

observations, and testing and collection 

of product characterization data. The 

program is authorized only in the 

commonwealth of Puerto Rico and in 

the states of Arkansas, California, 

Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, 

Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, 

North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, 

Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South 

Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, and 

Wisconsin. The EUP is effective from 

March 4, 2016, to March 31, 2017. 

3. 88877–EUP–2. (EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2015–0374). Issuance. University of 

Kentucky, Department of Entomology, 

S–225 Agricultural Science Center 

North, Lexington, KY 40546–0091. This 

EUP allows the use of 2,400,000 male 

Aedes aegypti WB1 Strain mosquitoes 

weighing 5.672 ounces and containing 

5.672 × 10¥5 ounce of the active 

ingredient Wolbachia pipientis, wAlbB 

Strain to evaluate the active ingredient’s 

effectiveness in suppressing and 

eliminating Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. 

The program is authorized only in the 

state of California over 840 acres 

(release and surveillance/monitoring 

acreage). The EUP is effective from 

October 15, 2015, to December 31, 2016. 

EPA received two comments, a positive 

one from the Consolidated Mosquito 

Abatement District in California and a 

negative one that was anonymous. As 

the anonymous commenter did not 

specify any particular safety concern 

with regard to this EUP’s issuance, the 

comment was not considered further. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: April 18, 2016. 

Robert C. McNally, 

Director, Biopesticides and Pollution 

Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide 

Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2016–09744 Filed 4–25–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0794; FRL–9943–82] 

Aldicarb, Bensulide, Coumaphos, 

Ethalfluralin, and Pirimiphos-methyl 

Registration Review; Draft Human 

Health and Ecological Risk 

Assessments; Notice of Availability 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

availability of EPA’s draft human health 

risk and draft ecological risk 

assessments for aldicarb, bensulide, 

coumaphos, ethalfluralin, and 

pirimiphos-methyl and opens a public 

comment period on these documents. 

Registration review is EPA’s periodic 

review of pesticide registrations to 

ensure that each pesticide continues to 

satisfy the statutory standard for 

registration, that is, the pesticide can 

perform its intended function without 

unreasonable adverse effects on human 

health or the environment. As part of 

the registration review process, the 

Agency has completed a comprehensive 

draft human health and ecological risk 

assessments for all aldicarb, bensulide, 

coumaphos, ethalfluralin, and 

pirimiphos-methyl uses. After reviewing 

comments received during the public 

comment period, EPA will issue a 

revised risk assessment, explain any 

changes to the draft risk assessment, and 

respond to comments and may request 

public input on risk mitigation before 

completing a proposed registration 

review decision for aldicarb, bensulide, 

coumaphos, ethalfluralin, and 

pirimiphos-methyl. Through this 

program, EPA is ensuring that each 

pesticide’s registration is based on 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2016 / Notices 24611 

current scientific and other knowledge, 

including its effects on human health 

and the environment. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before June 27, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0794, by 

one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on commenting 

or visiting the docket, along with more 

information about dockets generally, is 

available at http://www.epa.gov/

dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

pesticide specific information contact: 

The Chemical Review Manager listed in 

Table 1of Unit III. 

For general questions on the 

registration review program, contact: 

Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 308–8015; email address: 

dumas.richard@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, farm 

worker, and agricultural advocates; the 

chemical industry; pesticide users; and 

members of the public interested in the 

sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. 

Since others also may be interested, the 

Agency has not attempted to describe all 

the specific entities that may be affected 

by this action. If you have any questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

to a particular entity, consult the 

Chemical Review Manager listed in 

Table 1 of Unit III. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When preparing and submitting your 

comments, see the commenting tips at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets/

comments.html. 

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to 

achieve environmental justice, the fair 

treatment and meaningful involvement 

of any group, including minority and/or 

low income populations, in the 

development, implementation, and 

enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies. To help 

address potential environmental justice 

issues, the Agency seeks information on 

any groups or segments of the 

population who, as a result of their 

location, cultural practices, or other 

factors, may have atypical or 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health impacts or environmental 

effects from exposure to the pesticides 

discussed in this document, compared 

to the general population. 

II. Authority 

EPA is conducting its registration 

review of aldicarb, bensulide, 

coumaphos, ethalfluralin, and 

pirimiphos-methyl pursuant to section 

3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, 

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) 

and the Procedural Regulations for 

Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, 

subpart C. Section 3(g) of FIFRA 

provides, among other things, that the 

registrations of pesticides are to be 

reviewed every 15 years. Under FIFRA, 

a pesticide product may be registered or 

remain registered only if it meets the 

statutory standard for registration given 

in FIFRA section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 

136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance 

with widespread and commonly 

recognized practice, the pesticide 

product must perform its intended 

function without unreasonable adverse 

effects on the environment; that is, 

without any unreasonable risk to man or 

the environment, or a human dietary 

risk from residues that result from the 

use of a pesticide in or on food. 

III. Registration Reviews 

As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), 

EPA is reviewing the pesticide 

registration for aldicarb, bensulide, 

coumaphos, ethalfluralin, and 

pirimiphos-methyl to ensure that it 

continues to satisfy the FIFRA standard 

for registration—that is, that aldicarb, 

bensulide, coumaphos, ethalfluralin, 

and pirimiphos-methyl can still be used 

without unreasonable adverse effects on 

human health or the environment. 

TABLE 1—DRAFT RISK ASSESSMENTS BEING MADE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT

Registration review case name 

and number Docket ID number Chemical review manager and contact information 

Aldicarb .......................................................

0140 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0161 Susan Bartow, bartow.susan@epa.gov, (703) 603–0065. 

Bensulide ....................................................

2035 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0022 Margaret Hathaway, hathaway.margaret@epa.gov, (703) 305–5076. 

Coumaphos ................................................

0018 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0023 Brian Kettl, kettl.brian@epa.gov, (703) 347–0535. 

Ethalfluralin .................................................

2260 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0094 Kelly Ballard, ballard.kelly@epa.gov, (703) 305–8126. 

Pirimiphos-methyl .......................................

2535 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0056 Caitlin Newcamp, newcamp.caitlin@epa.gov, (703) 347–0397. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

24612 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2016 / Notices 

Aldicarb. Draft Human Health and 

Ecological Risk Assessments (EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2012–0161). Aldicarb is a systemic 

carbamate insecticide, acaricide, and 

nematicide registered for use on cotton, 

dry beans, peanuts, soybeans, sugar 

beets, and sweet potatoes. It is not 

registered for non-agricultural/

residential use. EPA conducted a 

comprehensive human health risk 

assessment including a highly refined 

acute dietary exposure assessment for 

all existing food uses of aldicarb. Acute 

dietary exposure estimates for drinking 

water as well as food and drinking water 

combined are of concern. A commodity 

specific analysis (CSA) was conducted 

to obtain estimates of acute exposure 

and risk following a single consumption 

of a single commodity. Exposure 

estimates were above the level of 

concern for children following 

consumption of sweet potatoes or 

potatoes. Additionally, there are shortand intermediate-term occupational 

handler risk estimates of concern for the 

registered uses of aldicarb with labelspecified personal protective 

equipment. EPA also conducted a 

screening level ecological risk 

assessment and identified potential 

risks to both aquatic and terrestrial nontarget organisms. The assessments did 

not cover the EDSP component of this 

registration review case, nor does it 

include a full pollinator assessment or 

a complete endangered species 

assessment. 

Bensulide. Draft Human Health and 

Ecological Risk Assessments (EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2008–0022). Bensulide is a 

systemic organophosphate herbicide 

registered to control grasses and 

broadleaf weeds in a variety of 

agricultural (e.g., lettuce, cantaloupe, 

broccoli) and non-agricultural (golf 

course, turf farm, residential lawn, 

rights-of-way, and landscaping) settings, 

and is usually applied to bare ground 

before crops are planted. EPA 

conducted a comprehensive human 

health risk assessment and identified 

risks of concern for dietary, residential, 

occupational, and spray drift exposures. 

The bensulide risk assessment retained 

the FQPA 10x safety factor due to the 

uncertainty in the human dose-response 

relationship for neuro-developmental 

effects. EPA also conducted an 

ecological risk assessment for bensulide, 

which identified risks of concern for 

non-listed species for birds, reptiles, 

and terrestrial-phase amphibians; 

mammals; freshwater fish and aquaticphase amphibians; marine/estuarine 

fish; freshwater invertebrates; and 

aquatic vascular plants. Neither an 

endangered species assessment nor a 

pollinator assessment been completed 

for bensulide at this time. Bensulide is 

on the second list of chemicals for tier 

one screening under the Endocrine 

Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP). 

Coumaphos. Draft Human Health and 

Ecological Risk Assessments (EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2008–0023). Coumaphos is an 

organophosphate acaricide. It is used to 

control ticks and mites on livestock, as 

well as to control varroa mites and small 

hive beetles in beehives. The human 

health risk assessment for coumaphos 

found dietary risks of concern, with 

food (beef meat) being the driver in the 

steady state risk estimates. In addition, 

almost all of the occupational exposure 

scenarios show risks of concern for both 

dermal and inhalation routes of 

exposure at varying levels of personal 

protection equipment and all 

formulations with the exception of 

liquid. The coumaphos risk assessment 

retained the FQPA 10x safety factor due 

to the uncertainty in human doseresponse relationship for neurodevelopmental effects. Coumaphos is 

expected to pose an acute risk to birds. 

Coumaphos is not expected to pose a 

risk to endangered or non-endangered 

mammals because of its limited use 

pattern. Coumaphos usage on cattle may 

pose a high acute risk to aquatic 

invertebrates. Coumaphos is not 

expected to pose chronic or acute risks 

to listed or non-listed fish. Neither a 

comprehensive endangered species 

assessment nor a pollinator assessment 

has been completed for coumaphos at 

this time. Coumaphos is on the second 

list of chemicals for Tier 1 screening 

under EDSP. 

Ethalfluralin. Draft Human Health 

and Ecological Risk Assessments (EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2011–0094). Ethalfluralin is a 

preemergence herbicide used to control 

a variety of annual grasses and broadleaf 

weeds on agricultural sites. Ethalfluralin 

has multiple end-use products that are 

registered for use on various agricultural 

crops. EPA conducted a comprehensive 

human health risk assessment and did 

not identify any risks of concern. EPA 

also conducted an ecological risk 

assessment. Potential risks to aquatic 

animals, aquatic and terrestrial plants, 

and mammals were identified. The 

assessments did not cover the EDSP 

component of this registration review 

case, nor does it include either a full 

pollinator assessment or a complete 

endangered species assessment. 

Pirimiphos-methyl. Draft Human 

Health Risk and Ecological Assessments 

(EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0056). 

Pirimiphos-methyl is a member of the 

organophosphate class of pesticides. 

Currently, it is registered for use as an 

insecticide in cattle ear tags, and on 

post-harvest stored grain/seeds 

(sorghum and corn). There are two 

special local need FIFRA section 24(c) 

registrations: A fogger treatment on iris 

bulbs in Washington, and a fogger and 

drench treatment on gladiola bulbs in 

Michigan. EPA conducted a human 

health risk assessment, and did not 

identify any risks of concern for dietary 

or residential exposures. However, risks 

of concern were identified for 

occupational exposure and for all 

handler scenarios. The pirimiphosmethyl risk assessment retained the 

FQPA 10x safety factor due to the 

uncertainty in human dose-response 

relationship for neuro-developmental 

effects. EPA also conducted a 

quantitative ecological risk assessment 

and identified potential risks to 

terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates. A 

complete endangered species 

assessment nor a pollinator assessment 

has been completed for pirimiphosmethyl. The assessments did not cover 

the EDSP component of this registration 

review case. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is 

providing an opportunity, through this 

notice of availability, for interested 

parties to provide comments and input 

concerning the Agency’s draft human 

health and ecological risk assessments 

for aldicarb, bensulide, coumaphos, 

ethalfluralin, and pirimiphos-methyl. 

Such comments and input could 

address, among other things, the 

Agency’s risk assessment methodologies 

and assumptions, as applied to this draft 

risk assessment. The Agency will 

consider all comments received during 

the public comment period and make 

changes, as appropriate, to the draft 

human health and ecological risk 

assessments. EPA will then issue a 

revised risk assessment, explain any 

changes to the draft risk assessment, and 

respond to comments. In the Federal 

Register notice announcing the 

availability of the revised risk 

assessment, if the revised risk 

assessment indicates risks of concern, 

the Agency may provide a comment 

period for the public to submit 

suggestions for mitigating the risk 

identified in the revised risk assessment 

before developing a proposed 

registration review decision on aldicarb, 

bensulide, coumaphos, ethalfluralin, 

and pirimiphos-methyl. 

1. Other related information. 

Additional information on aldicarb, 

bensulide, coumaphos, ethalfluralin, 

and pirimiphos-methyl is available on 

the Agency’s registration review 

program and its implementing 

regulation is available at https:// 

www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2016 / Notices 24613 

2. Information submission 

requirements. Anyone may submit data 

or information in response to this 

document. To be considered during a 

pesticide’s registration review, the 

submitted data or information must 

meet the following requirements: 

• To ensure that EPA will consider 

data or information submitted, 

interested persons must submit the data 

or information during the comment 

period. The Agency may, at its 

discretion, consider data or information 

submitted at a later date. 

• The data or information submitted 

must be presented in a legible and 

useable form. For example, an English 

translation must accompany any 

material that is not in English and a 

written transcript must accompany any 

information submitted as an 

audiographic or videographic record. 

Written material may be submitted in 

paper or electronic form. 

• Submitters must clearly identify the 

source of any submitted data or 

information. 

• Submitters may request the Agency 

to reconsider data or information that 

the Agency rejected in a previous 

review. However, submitters must 

explain why they believe the Agency 

should reconsider the data or 

information in the pesticide’s 

registration review. 

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the 

registration review docket for each 

pesticide case will remain publicly 

accessible through the duration of the 

registration review process; that is, until 

all actions required in the final decision 

on the registration review case have 

been completed. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: March 14, 2016. 

Yu-Ting Guilaran, 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2016–09732 Filed 4–25–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and 

Mergers of Bank Holding Companies 

The companies listed in this notice 

have applied to the Board for approval, 

pursuant to the Bank Holding Company 

Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) 

(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 

225), and all other applicable statutes 

and regulations to become a bank 

holding company and/or to acquire the 

assets or the ownership of, control of, or 

the power to vote shares of a bank or 

bank holding company and all of the 

banks and nonbanking companies 

owned by the bank holding company, 

including the companies listed below. 

The applications listed below, as well 

as other related filings required by the 

Board, are available for immediate 

inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 

indicated. The applications will also be 

available for inspection at the offices of 

the Board of Governors. Interested 

persons may express their views in 

writing on the standards enumerated in 

the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the 

proposal also involves the acquisition of 

a nonbanking company, the review also 

includes whether the acquisition of the 

nonbanking company complies with the 

standards in section 4 of the BHC Act 

(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise 

noted, nonbanking activities will be 

conducted throughout the United States. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments 

regarding each of these applications 

must be received at the Reserve Bank 

indicated or the offices of the Board of 

Governors not later than May 20, 2016. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta 

(Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice 

President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments can 

also be sent electronically to 

Applications.Comments@atl.frb.org: 

1. United Community Banks, Inc., 

Blairsville, Georgia; to merge with 

Tidelands Bancshares, Inc., and thereby 

acquire Tidelands Bank, both of Mt. 

Pleasant, South Carolina. 

B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 

(David L. Hubbard, Senior Manager) 

P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 

63166–2034. Comments can also be sent 

electronically to 

Comments.applications@stls.frb.org: 

1. Stupp Bros., Inc., and Midwest 

BankCentre, Inc., both of St. Louis, 

Missouri, to indirectly acquire 100 

percent of the voting shares of Bremen 

Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly 

acquire Bremen Bank and Trust 

Company, both in St Louis, Missouri. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, April 21, 2016. 

Michael J. Lewandowski, 

Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2016–09634 Filed 4–25–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

[OMB Control No. 9000–0145]; [Docket 

2016–0053; Sequence 7] 

Submission for OMB Review; Use of 

Data Universal Numbering System 

(DUNS) as Primary Contractor 

Identification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DOD), 

General Services Administration (GSA), 

and National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA). 

ACTION: Notice of request for public 

comments regarding an extension to an 

existing OMB clearance. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act Regulatory 

Secretariat Division will be submitting 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) a request to review and approve 

an extension of a previously approved 

information collection requirement 

concerning use of the Data Universal 

Numbering System (DUNS) as primary 

contractor identification. The DUNS 

number is the nine-digit identification 

number assigned by Dun and Bradstreet 

Information Services to an 

establishment. A notice was published 

in the Federal Register at 81 FR 6860 on 

February 9, 2016. Two respondents 

submitted eight comments that were 

received. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

May 26, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding 

this burden estimate or any other aspect 

of this collection of information, 

including suggestions for reducing this 

burden to: Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention: 

Desk Officer for GSA, Room 10236, 

NEOB, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally submit a copy to GSA by 

any of the following methods: 

• Regulations.gov: http://

www.regulations.gov. Submit comments 

via the Federal eRulemaking portal by 

searching the OMB control number. 

Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ 

that corresponds with ‘‘Information 

Collection 9000–0145, Use of Data 

Universal Numbering System (DUNS) as 

Primary Contractor Identification’’. 

Follow the instructions provided at the 

‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen. Please 

include your name, company name (if 

any), and ‘‘Information Collection 9000– 

0145, Use of Data Universal Numbering 

System (DUNS) as Primary Contractor 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES