alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

TENTH AMENDMENT TO THE 

PREMCOR RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN 

 

WHEREAS, The PremcorRefining Group Inc. (“Company”) previously adopted the Premcor Retirement Savings Plan (“Plan”); and 

 

WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 16.1 thereof; and 

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to reduce the limit forcertain mandatory distributions, effective March 28, 2005; 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, effective March 28, 2005, the Plan is amended as follows: 

 

All references to the amount “$5,000” in Sections 9, 10, 17.11(a) and 17.20 are hereby replaced by the amount “$1,000”. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this amendment as of this 14 day of February, 2005.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     59,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,227
<PP&E>                                          48,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,367
<BONDS>                                         34,051
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,107
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,384
<SALES>                                         41,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,713
<CGS>                                           31,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,260
<INCOME-TAX>                                       836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,424
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,424
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.07
        

</TABLE>
622.406-8 Investigations. ( a ) The head of the contracting activity is responsible for conducting labor standards investigations as prescribed in FAR 22.406-8(a).
( d ) The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 22.406-8(d).
[55 FR 5774, Feb. 16, 1990, as amended at 80 FR 6921, Feb. 9, 2015]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Donald P. Falsey, Respondent, v. Walter Eastman et al., Doing Business as Eastman Dry Wall Company, *1004Respondents, and Foxwood Farms, Ltd., et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal by Foxwood Farms, Ltd., and its carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to support the hoard’s finding that Foxwood Farms, Ltd., was a general contractor within the meaning of section 56 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The sole issue on this appeal is Foxwood Farms’’ liability under section 56. There is here no finding of an employment relationship between Foxwood Farms and claimant (cf. *Matter of Commissioner*v. *Ramapo Land Co.,*9 A D 2d 800). Foxwood Farms was in the business of building and selling homes on land it owned in Onondaga County. Eastman Dry Wall Co., a partnership, was under verbal contract to construct the dry walls in these homes. Claimant in turn was an employee of Eastman. It has been long held as a- general proposition that section 56 does not apply to an owner of property who contracts with an independent contractor to do work on his own promises *(Matter of Skora*v. *Conservative Bldg. Corp.,*249 N. Y. 519; *Matter of Dewhurst*v. *Simon,*295 N. Y. 352; *Matter of Mietlinski*v. *Hickman,*285 App. Div. 306; *Matter of Sutera*v. *Horowitz,*9 A D 2d 595). Decision reversed as to appellant Foxwood Farms, Ltd., and claim dismissed as to it, with costs against the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification**
I, Richard H. Marsh, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FirstEnergy Corp.,Ohio Edison Company, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, TheToledo Edison Company, Pennsylvania Power Company, Jersey Central Power &Light Company, Metropolitan Edison Company and Pennsylvania ElectricCompany; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of each registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. Each registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for such registrantand we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to suchregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of such registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in such registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringsuch registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, suchregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. Each registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to such registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of such registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect such registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in suchregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 4, 2004                                          /s/   Richard H. Marsh   Richard H. Marsh   Chief Financial Officer   
176
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6463
JOHN MAURICE MCNEIL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MARK A. HENRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-721-JFM) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: September 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Maurice McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McNeil v. Henry , No. CA-98-721-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### 9904.409-20 Purpose.

The purpose of this Standard is to provide criteria and guidance for assigning costs of tangible capital assets to cost accounting periods and for allocating such costs in cost objectives within such periods in an objective and consistent manner. The Standard is based on the concept that depreciation costs identified with cost accounting periods and benefiting cost objectives within periods should be a reasonable measure of the expiration of service potential of the tangible assets subject to depreciation. Adherence to this Standard should provide a systematic and rational flow of the costs of tangible capital assets to benefitted cost objectives over the expected service lives of the assets. This Standard does not cover nonwasting assets or natural resources which are subject to depletion.
#### 915.404-4-71 Profit and fee-system for construction and construction management contracts.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           New NIMH Strategic Plan Aims to Focus, Accelerate Mental Health Research      

# New NIMH Strategic Plan Aims to Focus, Accelerate Mental Health Research

NIMH has issued a new Strategic Plan for Research, which updates the strategic objectives of its 2008 plan, with a focus on balancing the need for long-term investments in basic research with urgent mental health needs. The plan includes four strategic priorities which will guide the institute’s research for the next five years:
                  - 		Define the mechanisms of complex behaviors
                  - 		Chart mental illness trajectories to determine when, where, and how to intervene
                  - 		Strive for prevention and cures
                  - 		Strengthen the public health impact of NIMH-supported research 

http://www.nih.gov/news/health/mar2015/nimh-26.htm?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Recent-Events
#### 704.7001 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes the policies and procedures to apply partner vetting to USAID acquisitions.
933.106 Solicitation provisions. ( a ) The contracting officer shall supplement the provision at 48 CFR 52.233-2, Service of Protest, in solicitations for other than simplified acquisitions by adding the provision at 952.233-2.
( b ) The contracting officer shall include the provision at 952.233-4 in solicitations for purchases above the simplified acquisition threshold.
( c ) The contracting officer shall include the provision at 952.233-5 in solicitations for purchases above the simplified acquisition threshold.
[61 FR 41708, Aug. 9, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 36367, July 22, 2009; 75 FR 29459, May 26, 2010]
§ 1.673 When will the Forest Service file its modified condition? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, if any license party proposes an alternative to a preliminary condition or prescription under § 1.671,the Forest Service will do the following within 60 days after the deadline for filing comments on FERC's draft NEPA document under 18 CFR 5.25(c): ( 1 ) Analyze under § 1.674 any alternative condition proposed under § 1.671 or 1.672; and
( 2 ) File with FERC: ( i ) Any condition the Forest Service adopts as its modified condition; and
( ii ) The Forest Service's analysis of the modified condition and any proposed alternative.
( b ) If the Forest Service needs additional time to complete the steps set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section, it will so inform FERC within 60 days after the deadline for filing comments on FERC's draft NEPA document under 18 CFR 5.25(c).
931.205-18 Independent research and development (IR&D) and bid and proposal (B&P) costs. ( c ) In addition to all the other FAR requirements for allowability of IR&D costs, costs for IR&D are allowable under DOE contracts to the extent: They are not otherwise unallowable; and they have potential benefit or relationship to the DOE program. The term ”DOE program” encompasses the DOE total mission and its objectives. In addition to all the other FAR requirements for allowability of B&P costs, costs for B&P are allowable under DOE contracts to the extent they are not otherwise unallowable.
[81 FR 45977, July 15, 2016]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Tri-Valley Corporation for the fiscal quarter  ended June 30, 2009, I, Arthur M. Evans, Chief Financial Officer of Tri-Valley Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. **§** 1350 as adopted pursuant to **§** 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

|   | (1) | Such Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Tri-Valley Corporation. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| Date:

 

  | August 10, 2009                                                  |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:                   | */s/Arthur M. Evans***                                           |
|                  | Arthur M. Evans, Chief Financial Officer

Tri-Valley Corporation |
#### 9905.502-62 Exemption.

None for this Standard.
#### 552.223-73 Preservation, Packaging, Packing, Marking and Labeling of Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) For Shipments.

As prescribed in 523.303(c), insert the following clause:

# Preservation, Packaging, Packing, Marking and Labeling of Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) For Shipments (JUN 2015)

(a) *Definition. United States,* as used in this clause, means the 48 adjoining U.S. States, Alaska, Hawaii, and U.S. territories and possessions, such as Puerto Rico.

(b) Preservation, packaging, packing, marking and labeling of hazardous materials for export shipment outside the United States in all transport modes shall comply with the following, as applicable:

(1) International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code as established by the International Maritime Organization (IMO).

(2) U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Hazardous Material Regulation (HMR) 49 CFR parts 171 through 180. (Note: Classifications permitted by the HMR, but not permitted by the IMDG code, such as Consumer Commodities classed as ORM-D, shall be packaged in accordance with the IMDG Code and dual-marked with both Consumer Commodity and IMDG marking and labeling.)

(3) Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Regulation 29 CFR part 1910.1200.

(4) International Air Transport Association (IATA), Dangerous Goods Regulation and/or International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Technical Instructions.

(5) AFMAN 24-204, Air Force Inter-Service Manual, Preparing Hazardous Materials For Military Air Shipments.

(6) Any preservation, packaging, packing, marking and labeling requirements contained elsewhere in this solicitation and contract.

(c) Preservation, packaging, packing, marking and labeling of hazardous materials for domestic shipments within the United States in all transport modes shall comply with the following; as applicable:

(1) U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Hazardous Material Regulation (HMR) 49 CFR parts 171 through 180.

(2) Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Regulation 29 CFR part 1910.1200.

(3) Any preservation, packaging, packing, marking and labeling requirements contained elsewhere in this solicitation and contract.

(d) Hazardous Material Packages designated for outside the United States destinations through Forwarding Points, Distribution Centers, or Container Consolidation Points (CCPs) shall comply with the IMDG, IATA, ICAO or AFMAN 24-204 codes, as applicable.

(e) The test certification data showing compliance with performance-oriented packaging or UN-approved packaging requirements shall be made available to GSA contract administration/management representatives or regulatory inspectors upon request.

(End of clause)

[80 FR 36249, June 24, 2015]
#### § 1005.76 Payments by a handler operating a partially regulated distributing plant.

See § 1000.76.
#### 852.273-73 Evaluation—Health-Care Resources.

As prescribed in 873.110(d), in lieu of FAR provision 52.212-2, the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially as follows:

# Evaluation—Health-Care Resources (NOV 2021)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following information or factors shall be used to evaluate offers: [*Contracting Officer insert evaluation information or factors, such as technical capability to meet the Government's requirements, past performance, or such other evaluation information or factors as the Contracting Officer deems necessary to evaluate offers. Price must be evaluated in every acquisition. The Contracting Officer may include the evaluation information or factors in their relative order of importance, such as in descending order of importance. The relative importance of any evaluation information must be stated in the solicitation.*]

(b) Except when it is determined not to be in the Government's best interest, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are materially unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). The Government may reject any or all proposals if such action is in the Government's interest. Additionally, the Government may waive informalities and minor irregularities in proposals received.

(c) If this solicitation is a request for proposals (RFP), a written notice of award or acceptance of a proposal, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received by the Contracting Officer before award.

(End of provision)

[86 FR 54118, Sept. 30, 2021]