alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Tribal Crime Data Collection Activities, 2015      

# Tribal Crime Data Collection Activities, 2015

# This report describes BJS activities to collect and improve data on crime and justice in Indian country, as required by the Tribal Law and Order Act, 2010. The report summarizes BJS’s efforts in 2015 to:

                  -  Field a survey on the capabilities and caseloads of tribal court systems 
                  -  Develop a survey of all state and local law enforcement agencies and prosecutors’ offices serving Indian country 
                  -  Study the handling of American Indian and Alaska Native juvenile and adult criminal cases in the federal justice system 
                  -  Enhance current funding programs to support tribal participation in regional and national criminal justice databases 

The report also summarizes tribal eligibility for Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant awards from 2008 to 2015 and presents Uniform Crime Reporting Program statistics on offenses reported by tribal law enforcement agencies from 2008 to 2013. 

http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&&iid=5323&utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
#### 842.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes policies and procedures for contract administration and audit services for all Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) contracting activities.

[85 FR 60077, Sept. 24, 2020]
NO. 12-13-00325-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ALVIN EUGENE HINES, 

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 3RD

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to imprisonment for sixty years. We 

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

In a criminal case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is 

imposed or within ninety days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. TEX. R. APP. P.

26.2(a). Appellant’s sentence was imposed on June 6, 2013, and he did not file a motion for new 

trial. Therefore, his notice of appeal was due to have been filed no later than July 8, 2013. 

However, Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until September 16, 2013. Because 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed on or before July 8, 2013, it was untimely, and this 

court has no jurisdiction of the appeal.

On October 29, 2013, this court notified Appellant that, pursuant to Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure 37.2 and 44.3, his notice of appeal was untimely and there was no timely 

motion for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. 

Appellant was further informed that the appeal would be dismissed unless the information in this 

appeal was amended to show the jurisdiction of this court. In response to this notice, Appellant 

filed a second notice of appeal. However, this notice of appeal was also untimely. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). Therefore, Appellant has not established the jurisdiction of this court.
2

Because this court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as 

provided by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 26.3, the appeal is dismissed for want 

of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

Opinion delivered November 21, 2013.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 21, 2013

NO. 12-13-00325-CR

ALVIN EUGENE HINES,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 3rd District Court 

of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 31047)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the 

appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision 

be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



CERTIFICATION



I, Jefferson F. Allen, Chief Executive Officer of Premcor Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, do hereby certify as follows with respect to the Company:



| | 1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification on this 27thday of April 2005.



By:

/s/ Jefferson F. AllenChief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Premcor Inc. and will be retained by Premcor Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL LENOIR SMITH,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

YATES, Warden; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 15528

D.C. No. 1:07

- cv

- 01547

- SRB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 11, 2019 **

Before: CANBY, SILVERMAN, and GRABER , Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Michael Lenoir Smith appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# F ILED

JUN 13 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

San Diego , 670 F.3d 957, 970 (9th Cir. 2011) (cross

- motions for summary

judgment); May v. Baldwin , 109 F.3d 557, 560

- 61 (9th Cir. 1997) (district court’s

decision on qualified immunity) . We affirm.

The di strict court properly granted summary judgment on the basis of

qualified immunity because it would not have been clear to every reasonable

official that housing Smith in prisons in the Central Valley, where Valley Fever is

endemic, was unlawful under the c ircumstances

. See Ashcroft v. al

- Kidd , 563 U.S.

731, 735 (2011) (explaining two

- part test for qualified immunity); Hines v.

Youseff

, 914 F.3d 1218, 12 29

- 30 (9th Cir. 2019) ( existing Valley Fever cases did

not clearly establish a “right to be free from heightened exposure to Valley Fever

spores”)

.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. Se e Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

.

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

JAMES ANTHONY PENDERGRASS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. 17-cv-0546 (KBJ)

)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, 

et al.,

)

)

)

Defendants. )

)

ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey’s Report and 

Recommendation is ADOPTED as to its findings and conclusions. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is

DENIED, and Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

DATE: September 9, 2020 Ketanji Brown Jackson

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

United States District Judge
5.406 Public disclosure of justification documents for certain contract actions. ( a ) Justifications and approvals for other than full and open competition must be posted in accordance with 6.305.
( b ) Limited-source justifications (excluding brand name) for FSS orders or blanket purchase agreements with an estimated value greater than the simplified acquisition threshold must be posted in accordance with 8.405-6(a)(2).
( c ) Justifications for task or delivery orders greater than the simplified acquisition threshold and awarded without providing for fair opportunity must be posted in accordance with 16.505(b)(2)(ii)(D).
[76 FR 14552, Mar. 16, 2011]
```

[Federal Register: April 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 77)]
[Notices]               
[Page 20980]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22ap10-25]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Missouri Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the 
Missouri Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene on Saturday, 
May 22, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 5 p.m. at John 
Cook School of Business Auditorium, St. Louis University, 3674 Lindell, 
St. Louis, Missouri 63108. The purpose of the meeting is to conduct a 
community public briefing meeting concerning the ``Civil Rights 
Implications of Educational Opportunities in Urban Public School 
Settings and Education Reform in Missouri * * * St. Louis Public 
Schools.''
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by June 11, 2010. The 
address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 400 State Avenue, Suite 
908, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Persons wishing to e-mail their 
comments, or to present their comments verbally at the meeting, or who 
desire additional information should contact Farella E. Robinson, 
Regional Director, Central Regional Office, at (913) 551-1400, (or for 
hearing impaired TDD 913-551-1414), or by e-mail to 
frobinson@usccr.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Central Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Central Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, April 19, 2010.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2010-9329 Filed 4-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
873.107 Socioeconomic programs. ( a ) The Veterans First Contracting Program in VAAR subpart 819.70 takes precedence over other small business programs. (38 U.S.C. 8127-8128)
( b ) ( 1 ) Except for contract actions subject to 808.002(a)(2), competitive contract actions not otherwise excluded under this part shall be set-aside for VIP-listed service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) concerns or veteran-owned small business (VOSB) concerns if the contracting officer has a reasonable expectation that two or more eligible small business concerns owned and controlled by Veterans will submit offers and that the award can be made at a fair and reasonable price that offers best value to the United States. (38 U.S.C. 8127-8128)
( 2 ) The contracting officer shall proceed with the acquisition under the simplified procedures of this part considering priority sources (see 808.008(a)(2) and 873.103) and preferences for other small businesses in accordance with 819.203-70 and 819.7004. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( c ) Without regard to FAR 13.003(b)(1), 19.203, 19.502, the head of the contracting activity (HCA) may approve a waiver from the requirement for any set-aside for small business participation when a waiver is determined to be in the best interest of the Government. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( d ) The contracting officer shall ensure priorities for veteran-owned small businesses are implemented within the VA hierarchy of small business program preferences, established by 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128, as implemented in VAAR subpart 819.70, the Veterans First Contracting Program. Specifically, the contracting officer shall consider preferences for verified service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSBs) first, then preferences for verified veteran-owned small businesses (VOSBs). These priorities will be followed by preferences for other small business concerns in accordance with FAR 19.203, 819.203-70, and 819.7004. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
#### 570.303-3 Late offers, modifications of offers, and withdrawals of offers.

Follow the procedures in FAR 15.208.
#### 970.2803 Insurance.
#### 852.214-71 Restrictions on Alternate Item(s).

As prescribed in 814.201-6(a)(1), insert the following provision:

# Restrictions on Alternate Item(s) (MAY 2018)

Bids on [ ]* will be considered only if acceptable bids on [ ]** are not received or do not satisfy the total requirement.

*Contracting Officer will insert an alternate item that is considered acceptable.

**Contracting Officer will insert the required item and item number.

(End of provision)

[83 FR 16210, Apr. 16, 2018]
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Alex
Werber, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Tissera,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: December 15, 2008By: /s/Alex WerberName:
      Alex WerberTitle:
      Chief Financial Officerand Chief Accounting
Officer
Exhibit 32.2
                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Home Director, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, DARYL STEMM, the Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 11, 2007

/s/ Daryl Stemm
------------------------------
Daryl Stemm,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10319 

To require annual reports on bonuses awarded to career Senior Executive 

Service employees, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2024 

Mr. FLOOD (for himself, Mr. BOST, Mr. VAN ORDEN, Mr. CISCOMANI, and 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To require annual reports on bonuses awarded to career 

Senior Executive Service employees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act maybe cited as the ‘‘Boosting Openness and 

5 Notable Understanding of Salaries Transparency Act’’ or 

6 the ‘‘BONUS Transparency Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 10319 IH

1 SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORTS ON PERFORMANCE AWARDS FOR 

2 CAREER SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE EM3 PLOYEES. 

4 (a) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the end 

5 of each fiscal year beginning with fiscal year 2024, the 

6 head of each agency of the executive branch of Govern7 ment shall submit a report to Congress on performance 

8 awards paid to career appointees of such agency. Each 

9 such report shall include, with respect to any performance 

10 award paid during the most recently ended fiscal year— 

11 (1) the total number of performance awards 

12 paid to career appointees of the agency; 

13 (2) the name, job title, and annual rate of pay 

14 of any career appointee paid a performance award; 

15 (3) the amount of each performance award so 

16 paid; and 

17 (4) the appropriations accounts from which 

18 amounts were used to pay such a performance 

19 award. 

20 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

21 (1) the term ‘‘career appointee’’ has the mean22 ing given that term in section 3132(a) of title 5, 

23 United States Code; and 

24 (2) the term ‘‘performance award’’ includes any 

25 performance award paid by the Government, includ26 ing any bonus or award (including retention and reVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:14 Dec 31, 2024 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H10319.IH H10319

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 10319 IH

1 cruitment bonuses) under chapter 45 or 53 of such 

2 title 5. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
(50 Misc. Rep. 189.)

#### In re ADDERLEY et al.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, Fulton County.

April, 1906.)

Infants—Exchange of Property.

A proceeding to obtain authority, under Code Civ. Proc. § 2348, relating to the sale of the real estate of infants, whereby it is sought to exchange the interests of the infants as tenants in common in four out of five separate parcels of real estate, in consideration of a conveyance by the other tenants in common of their interest in the other parcel to the infants, is unauthorized.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 27, Cent. Dig. Infants, §§ 66, 67.]

Application for the sale of certain realty belonging to Eleanor E. Adderley and others, infants.' Application denied.

O’Brien & Short, for petitioner.

Thomas P. Adderley, special guardian, for infants.

SPENCER, J.

This proceeding, as its title imports, is an application for authority to sell the real estate of infants under the provisions of section, 2348 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It appears that the infants and three other persons are tenants in common of five separate parcels of real estate, and it is intended by this proceeding to effect an exchange of the interest of the infants in four of the parcels to the other tenants, in consideration that such other tenants convey to the infants their, interests in the one parcel, thereby effecting á partial partition of the parcels among the several owners.

No doubt such an exchange of interests would be beneficial to all the parties and avoid the expense of a partition action, but the statute *422by its terms does not authorize such a transaction. This court has no inherent jurisdiction over the real estate of infants. Its authority rests solely upon the statute. The statute must be strictly construed. In Moran v. James, 20 Misc. Rep. 235, 45 N. Y. Supp. 537; Id.,21 App. Div. 183, 47 N. Y. Supp. 486, an exchange of property was held to be unauthorized by the statute. I am unable to distinguish that case from the present. Certainly the reasons there given for the holding that an exchange of property is invalid, as not authorized by the statute, has equal application to the transaction here contemplated.

The application, therefore, is denied. The petitioner, if so advised, may take an order sending the proceedings back to the referee for a further examination and hearing, or enter an order discontinuing the proceedings. Ordered accordingly.
#### 970.1907-4 Subcontracting plan requirements.

Pursuant to the clause at 48 CFR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, which is required for all management and operating contracts, each management and operating contract shall include a subcontracting plan which is effective for the term of the contract. Goals for the contract shall be negotiated annually when revised funding levels are determined. The plan should include provisions for revising the goals or any other sections of the plan. Such revisions shall be in writing, approved by the contracting officer, and shall be specifically made a material part of the contract.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000. Redesignated at 75 FR 68219, Nov. 5, 2010]