alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Digital Shareables on Child and Adolescent Mental Health      

# Resource: Digital Shareables on Child and Adolescent Mental Health

This webpage contains resources to raise awareness about the importance of child and adolescent mental health. Resources include graphics, fact sheets, videos, activity workbooks, social media content, and more. **Learn more.**
#### WALKER v. NEWTON FALLS PAPER CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 7, 1906.)

Action by *1150Isaiah Walker against the Newton Falls Paper Company.

PER CURIAM.

Motion denied.

KELLOGG, J.,

not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 30 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.J.Res.30

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-three

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
  United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor 
  relating to ``Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and 
                    Exercising Shareholder Rights''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to ``Prudence and 
Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder 
Rights'' (87 Fed. Reg. 73822 (December 1, 2022)), and such rule shall 
have no force or effect.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Youth Apprenticeship      

# Youth Apprenticeship

This webpage provides information on youth apprenticeship, including state and local programs, tools, research, and resources related to workers compensation and child labor laws. Business leaders, workforce professionals, educators, and youth-serving professionals can use this information as they create and promote apprenticeship opportunities for youth. 

https://apprenticeshipusa.workforcegps.org/resources/2017/02/02/10/56/Apprenticeship-Youth
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayde H. Martin, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 499]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J), rendered October 10, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the conviction of attempted robbery in the first degree to at*641tempted robbery in the third degree and vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing on that conviction.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court failed to inquire further to ensure that his plea to the counts of robbery in the first degree under Penal Law § 160.15 (4) was knowing and voluntary after he stated that the firearms displayed during the robberies were not loaded. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review as the defendant neither moved to withdraw his plea on this ground nor moved to vacate the judgment pursuant to CPL 440.10, and the “rare case” exception to the preservation requirement does not apply *(People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]). We decline to review this contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

However, the defendant’s contention regarding the adequacy of his plea allocution to attempted robbeiy in the first degree presents an exception to the preservation requirement and may be reviewed on direct appeal (see *People v Lopez, supra).*The defendant’s statement during the allocution that neither he nor his accomplice had a firearm with respect to the attempted robbery negated an essential element of the crime (see Penal Law § 160.15 [4] [displays what appears to be a firearm]) and imposed an obligation on the Supreme Court to inquire further (see *People v Lopez, supra).*In the absence of proof that a firearm was displayed, the defendant could only be convicted of attempted robbery in the third degree (see *People v Lopez,*73 NY2d 214, 219 [1989]). The People correctly consent to the reduction of the defendant’s conviction of attempted robbery in the first degree to attempted robbery in the third degree. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing on that conviction.

The sentences imposed on the defendant’s convictions of robbery in the first degree were not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Florio, J.P., Townes, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Order entered December 18, 2019 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01292-CV 

IN RE RODNEY J. MCGAFFEY, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 439th Judicial District Court 

Rockwall County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1-10-582 

ORDER 

Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. 

 

 /David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63of title 18, United States Code)

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S.A.B. de C.V. (the “Company”), does hereby certify to his knowledge that:

 

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   April 12, 2013 |                      |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                        |                      |
|                        | /s/   Adolfo Castro Rivas |
|                        | Adolfo   Castro Rivas     |
|                        | Chief   Executive Officer |
|                        | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Beyond the Box Resource Guide      

# Resource: Beyond the Box Resource Guide

This guide provides information on how colleges and universities can alter their use of criminal justice information in the higher education admissions process to remove barriers for students with criminal records. 

http://www.ed.gov/beyondthebox?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
\D ST.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Wd REGION IX

pno- 75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 95105-3901

OFFICE OF THE

NOV 2 0 214 REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR

Mr. Eric L. Hiser

Jorden Bischoff& Hiser, PLC

7272 E. Indian School Road, Suite 360

Scottsdale, Arizona 85251

Dear Mr. Hiser:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has received the petition you submitted on October

31, 2014 on behalf of Lhoist North America of Arizona, Inc. (LNA), seeking reconsideration and a stay

of effectiveness of certain elements of EPA’s final nile entitled “Promulgation of Air Quality

Implementation Plans; Arizona; Regional Haze and Interstate Visibility Transport Federal

implementation Plan,” 79 FR 52420 (September 3, 2014), as it applies to the Nelson Lime Plant.

EPA proposed to set nitrogen oxides (NOx) emission limits fbr Kilns I and 2 at the Nelson Lime Plant

based on a control efficiency for selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) of 50 percent. In response to

comments indicating that a higher control efficiency was achievable with SNCR, our final rule included

a series of control technology demonstration requirements (“optimization requirements”) for the SNCR

system on Kilns I and 2 to assess whether lower emission limits would be achievable with SNCR at

these units. LNA’s petition seeks reconsideration and an administrative stay of these requirements

pursuant to Clean Air Action section 307(d)(7)(B).

In response to your petition, EPA is granting reconsideration ofthe optimization requirements for the

Nelson Lime Plant. Accordingly, EPA plans to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking to revise this

portion of the rule. LNA’s petition indicates that, if EPA proposes to remove the optimization

requirements prior to December 31, 2014, then LNA would not seek a stay of the final rule.

Accordingly, we are not acting on LNA ‘s request for a stay at this time.

If you have any questions regarding the reconsideration process, please contact Charlotte Withey at

(415) 972-3915. We thank you for your continued interest in this rule and look forward to hearing from

you during the reconsideration process.

Sincerely,

Jared Blumenfèld

cc: Eric Massey, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (via email)

Mark Johnson, LNA (via email)

Ed Barry, LNA (via email)

Herb Verville, LNA (via email)

Printed O/l Recvled Paper
#### Bank of New York, Respondent, v Cheng Yu Corp. et al., Defendants, and Hung Lin Hu, Appellant.

— In an action on a promissory note, defendant Hung Lin Hu appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 9, 1978, which granted plaintiff’s motion to strike his demand for a jury trial. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. This is an action on a promissory note which contained a clause under which the signer waived his right to a trial by jury in any action brought on the note. Appellant was sued as a personal guarantor of the note. While he admits having signed the guarantee, he alleges that he does not read or understand English and that the contents of the agreement were misrepresented to him by the individual codefendant and a bank officer. He contends that the note was therefore void as to him (see *Pimpinello v Swift & Co.,*253 NY 159). Appellant’s allegations, if proved, would void the instrument as to him, including the jury waiver clause. In these circumstances, the signer is entitled to a jury trial on the defense of misrepresentation (see, e.g., *Federal Housecrañ*v *Faria,*28 Mise 2d 155; *International Rooñng Corp. v Van Der Veer,*43 Mise 2d 93; *Gardner & North Rooñng & Siding Corp. v Champagne,*55 Mise 2d 413; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 4102.13; cf. *Freeman v Island Discount Corp.,*5 AD2d 778; *James Talcott, Inc. v Wilson Hosiery Co.,*32 AD2d 524). We conclude, therefore, that Special Term erred in striking appellant’s jury demand. Damiani, J. P., Suozzi, Lazer and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### Georgia Ashley, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[779 NYS2d 502]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendants City of New York and New York City Police Department appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), dated December 18, 2002, as denied that branch of their cross motion *743which was for partial summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover damages for negligent hiring and retention asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the cross motion is granted, and so much of the complaint as sought to recover damages for negligent hiring and retention asserted against the appellants is dismissed.

The plaintiff’s decedent was killed when his vehicle was struck by a vehicle allegedly being pursued in a high-speed chase by New York City police officers. The plaintiff subsequently commenced this action against, among others, the City of New York and the New York City Police Department (hereinafter collectively the City defendants), inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death. The plaintiff alleged that the City defendants were negligent, among other things, in hiring and retaining the officers. Although disputing the allegation that the police officers were engaged in a high-speed chase, the City defendants conceded that the officers were acting within the scope of their employment when the accident occurred. Therefore, the City defendants cross-moved for partial summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover damages for negligent hiring and retention asserted against them. The Supreme Court denied that branch of the City defendants’ cross motion.

Generally, where an employee is acting within the scope of his or her employment, the employer is liable for the employee’s negligence under a theory of respondeat superior and the plaintiff may not proceed with a cause of action to recover damages for negligent hiring and retention (see *Rossetti v Board of Educ. of Schalmont Cent. School Dist.,*277 AD2d 668, 670 [2000]; *Liddell v Slocum-Dickson Med. Group,*273 AD2d 924 [2000]; *Karoon v New York City Tr. Auth.,*241 AD2d 323, 324 [1997]; *Eifert v Bush,*27 AD2d 950, 951 [1967], *affd*22 NY2d 681 [1968]). Since the City defendants conceded that the police officers were acting within the scope of their employment when the accident occurred, the Supreme Court should have granted partial summary judgment dismissing so much of the complaint as sought to recover damages for negligent hiring and retention asserted against them. Altman, J.P., Florio, Smith and Rivera, JJ., concur.
IIA 

Calendar No. 33 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 7 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2023 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

MARCH 28, 2023 

Committee discharged pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 1622, and placed on the 

calendar 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to a national emergency declared by the President 

on March 13, 2020. 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, pursuant to section 202 of the National Emer4 gencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national emergency de5 clared by the finding of the President on March 13, 2020, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HJ 7 PCS 

1 in Proclamation 9994 (85 Fed. Reg. 15337) is hereby ter2 minated. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 

2023. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 33 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 7 

JOINT RESOLUTION 

Relating to a national emergency declared by the 

President on March 13, 2020. 

MARCH 28, 2023 

Committee discharged pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 1622, and 

placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### § 1006.18 Cooperative association.

See § 1000.18.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1333

BERNARD J. SCHULTE, on behalf of himself and

all others similarly situated, and

derivatively on behalf of Oxford Tax Exempt

Fund Limited Partnership; GEORGE A. CRAIG, on

behalf of himself and all others similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

versus

OXFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; LEO E.

ZICKLER; OXFORD TAX EXEMPT FUND I CORPORATION;

OXFORD FUND II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; OXFORD

INVESTMENT CORPORATION; OXFORD INVESTMENT II

CORPORATION; OXFORD EQUITIES CORPORATION;

OXFORD TAX EXEMPT FUND II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP;

OXFORD TAX EXEMPT FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP;

OXFORD TAX EXEMPT FUND II CORPORATION, a

Maryland Corporation; OXFORD REALTY FINANCIAL

GROUP, INCORPORATED, a Maryland Corporation;

OXFORD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Maryland

Corporation; OXFORD BETHESDA II LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP, a Maryland limited partnership,

Defendants - Appellees,

versus

JOAN KING, Individually and as state class

representative,

Movant - Appellant.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-95-3643-WMN)

Submitted: February 10, 1998 Decided: February 24, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joan King, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Juster Piven, LAW OFFICE OF

CHARLES J. PIVEN, Baltimore, Maryland; Kenneth George Gilman, David

Pastor, GILMAN & PASTOR, Boston, Massachusetts; Daniel Charles

Girard, GIRARD & GREEN, P.C., San Francisco, California; Andrew

Bennett Weissman, Robert Franklin Hoyt, Robert Bruce McCaw, WILMER,

CUTLER & PICKERING, Washington, D.C.; Charles Jay Landy, SHAW,

PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order approving the

settlement agreement in this securities fraud class action suit. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Schulte v. King, No. CA-95-3643-WMN (D. Md. Feb.

23, 1997); see In re Jiffy Lube Securities Litig., 927 F.2d 155

(4th Cir. 1991); Flinn v. FMC Corp., 528 F.2d 1169 (4th Cir. 1975).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|   | **Exhibit 32.1** |
|--------|------------------|

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of AmBase Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Bianco, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley            Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: August 4, 2009 | /s/ Richard A. Bianco |
|----------------------|-----------------------|

|   | Richard A. Bianco |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|

|   | AmBase Corporation |
|--------|--------------------|