alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                           PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>              301,699
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                  21,203
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                10,335
<OTHER-ASSETS>                           5,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         338,582
<COMMON>                                 8,780
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>               20,141
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                    109,077
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>         137,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                    74,573
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                      21,523
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                    0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>               0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                    0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                  0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                             0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>         104,488
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>          338,582
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>               66,140
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                     2,021
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              59,330
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              61,351
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                  4,789
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                        (439)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>           4,350
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 1,573
<NET-INCOME>                             2,777
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>            2,777
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 4,975
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                  461
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                  34,992
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.00


</TABLE>
##### 



Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer
of CNA Financial Corporation
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
(As adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of CNA Financial Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



| |  |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                                                                        

Dated: August 8, 2003

| |  |                                              
| |  | ---------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Stephen W. Lilienthal                    
| |  |                                              
| |  | Stephen W. Lilienthal
Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Price, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York ■ County, rendered on April 4, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *863
      *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Fein, J. P., Bloom, Silverman, Ross and Yesawich, JJ.
#### Celeste Rovello et al., Appellants, v Donald S. Klein et al., Defendants, and Martin Sklar et al., Respondents.

[775 NYS2d 899]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered December 20, 2002, as granted the cross motion of the defendants Martin Sklar, Betsy & Adam, Ltd., and Betsy & Adam Sales, Inc., to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

After the judicial settlement of the estate of the plaintiffs’ decedent, Jack Rovello, the plaintiffs allegedly discovered that the respondents Martin Sklar, Betsy & Adam, Ltd., and Betsy & Adam Sales, Inc. (hereinafter the respondents), defrauded the estate by concealing certain assets from the defendant George Lambert, the public administrator assigned to administer the estate. The plaintiffs commenced this action against, among others, the respondents, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud. The respondents cross-moved to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the grounds of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, waiver, and documentary evidence. The Supreme Court granted the cross motion on these grounds. We affirm on a different ground.

If there is any right of recovery against the respondents, such right is an asset of the estate and an action may be maintained thereon only by a duly authorized representative of the estate *(see Steuer v Hector’s Tavern,*1 AD2d 1003 [1956]; *Gerber v State Bank,*167 App Div 263, 266 [1915]; *Nichols v Smith,*164 App Div 304, 310 [1914]). As it is undisputed that none of the plaintiffs is an authorized representative of the estate, this ac*605tion was properly dismissed insofar as asserted against the respondents.

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the parties’ remaining contentions. Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
#### SCHNURR, Appellant, v. QUINN, Respondnt.

(Supreme .Court, Appellate Division, Secnd Department.

March 2, 1906.)

Action by filly Schnurr against Alexander Quinn.

No pinion. Motion denied.
#### 52.214-6 Explanation to Prospective Bidders.

As prescribed in 14.201-6(c)(2), insert the following provision:

# Explanation to Prospective Bidders (APR 1984)

Any prospective bidder desiring an explanation or interpretation of the solicitation, drawings, specifications, etc., must request it in writing soon enough to allow a reply to reach all prospective bidders before the submission of their bids. Oral explanations or instructions given before the award of a contract will not be binding. Any information given a prospective bidder concerning a solicitation will be furnished promptly to all other prospective bidders as an amendment to the solicitation, if that information is necessary in submitting bids or if the lack of it would be prejudicial to other prospective bidders.

(End of provision)

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 25531, June 21, 1990]
##### 



Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Canada Life Financial Corporation (the
Company) on Form 40-F for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as submitted to
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
David A. Nield, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, solely
to the extent necessary to meet the requirements, if any, of 18 U.S.C.§ 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the Information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ David A. Nield
David A. Nield
Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003





---



##### 



Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the annual report of Canada Life Financial Corporation (the
Company) on Form 40-F for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as submitted to
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Patrick G. Crowley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
solely to the extent necessary to meet the requirements, if any, of 18 U.S.C.§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the Information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Patrick G. Crowley
Patrick G. Crowley
Chief Financial Officer
March 28, 2003
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           U.S. Department of Education Newsletters      

# U.S. Department of Education Newsletters

Interested persons can sign up to receive 1-2 emails a week on new teaching resources and ED grant opportunities.

http://www.ed.gov/news/newsletters/edinfo/index.html?src=ln
#### In the Matter of Jason A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 852]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Weinstein, J.), dated June 25, 2003, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated May 14, 2003, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a period of one year. The appeal brings up for review the fact-*792finding order dated May 14, 2003, and the denial, after a hearing, of the appellant’s motion to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as placed the appellant on probation for a period of one year is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as the period of probation has expired (see *Matter of Wanji W.,*305 AD2d 690 [2003]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, under the circumstances, the Family Court correctly denied his motion to suppress the complainant’s identification testimony (see *Matter of Ronald W.,*146 AD2d 703 [1989]; *Matter of Kenneth S.,*128 AD2d 881 [1987]). Furthermore, under the circumstances, the court providently exercised its discretion in refusing to strike the complainant’s testimony as a sanction for the destruction of *Rosario*material (see *People v Rosario,*9 NY2d 286 [1961], *cert denied*368 US 866 [1961]), the audiotape of a 911 telephone call (see *People v Banch,*80 NY2d 610 [1992]; *People v Martinez,*71 NY2d 937 [1988]; *People v Haupt,*71 NY2d 929 [1988]). There was no showing of bad faith on the part of the presentment agency or evidence of prejudice to the appellant whose counsel had the opportunity to cross-examine the presentment agency’s witnesses using a “sprint” report of the 911 call *(see People v Green,*244 AD2d 423 [1997]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter,. J.P., Townes, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Baccalaureate and Beyond: A First Look at the Employment Experiences and Lives of College Graduates, 4 Years On      

# Baccalaureate and Beyond: A First Look at the Employment Experiences and Lives of College Graduates, 4 Years On

This report presents initial findings about the labor market experiences and enrollment in additional postsecondary degree programs of bachelor's degree recipients approximately four years after they completed their 2007-08 degrees. These findings are based on data from the second follow-up of the Baccalaureate and Beyond Longitudinal Study

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2014141&utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of CABG Medical, Inc.;2
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: February 27, 2006/s/ John L. Babitt

John L. BabittChief Financial Officer
908.7121 Special materials. This section covers the purchase of materials peculiar to the DOE program. While purchases of these materials may be unclassified, the specific quantities, destination or use may be classified (see appropriate sections of the Classification Guide). Contracting officers shall require authorized contractors to obtain the special materials identified in the following subsections in accordance with the following procedures: ( a ) *Heavy water.* The Senior Program Official or designee controls the acquisition and production of heavy water for a given program. Request for orders shall be placed directly with the cognizant Senior Program Official or designee.
( b ) *Precious metals.* ( 1 ) NNSA, Y-12 National Security Complex in Oak Ridge, TN is responsible for maintaining the DOE supply of precious metals. These metals are platinum, palladium, iridium, osmium, rhodium, ruthenium, gold and silver. The NNSA Y-12 National Security Complex has assigned management of these precious metals to its Management and Operating (M&O) contractor. DOE and NNSA offices and authorized contractors shall coordinate with the Y-12 M&O contractor regarding the availability of these metals prior to purchasing in the open market.
( 2 ) For contractor inventory containing precious metals or possessing precious metals excess, see 945.604-1 for contractor identification and reporting.
( c ) *Lithium.* Lithium is available from Y-12 at no cost other than normal packing, handling, and shipping charges from Oak Ridge. The excess quantities at Y-12 are the first source of supply prior to procurement of lithium compounds from any other source.
[77 FR 74387, Dec. 14, 2012]
(115 App. Div. 154)

#### KINDBERG v. CHAPMAN.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 19, 1906.

Reference—On Counterclaim.

Where plaintiff’s cause of action on contract for a definite sum is not denied, but defendant sets up a counterclaim, requiring examination of a long account, the cause is referable.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 42, Cent. Dig. References, §§ 13-23, 27.]

Appeal from Special Term, New York County.

Action by Edward O. Kindberg against Robert R. Chapman. Erom an order directing a reference to hear and determine, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before O’BRIEN, P. J., and INGRAHAM, CLARKE, HOUGHTON, and SCOTT, JJ.

*687Theodore T. Baylor, for appellant.

August Reymert, for respondent.

SCOTT, J.

Plaintiff sues to recover the sum of $5,000 upon a promissory note. His claim is not contested, but the defendant, by way of counterclaim, seeks to establish an indebtedness by plaintiff to him in the sum of $6,000. This claim is for moneys said to have been loaned to plaintiff and paid out for his account, mainly in small sums, between October 28th and November 12th. By his bill of particulars defendant shows that his claim embraces some 340 items, The reply to the counterclaim is, in effect, a general denial. . From an order of reference granted on plaintiff’s motion, defendant appeals. The cause of action set up by the counterclaim would undoubtedly justify a compulsory order of reference, if embodied in a complaint, and while it is the general rule that, if a plaintiff sues upon a contract for a definite sum of money, or for damages ex contractu, and his cause of action be gainsaid by the defendant, the cause is not referable, notwithstanding anything which the defendant may set up in his answer; yet if, as in the present case, the plaintiff’s claim is not gainsaid, and the defendant sets up- a counterclaim which requires the examination of a long account, then the cause is referable. Stock v. Col. Fuel & Iron Co., 142 N. Y. 236, 37 N. E. 1, 25 L. R. A. 67.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.
#### 852.241-70 Disputes—Utility Contracts.

As prescribed in 841.501-70, insert the following clause:

# Disputes—Utility Contracts (SEP 2020)

(a) *Definition.* As used in this clause, *Independent regulatory body* means the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, a state-wide agency, or an agency with less than state-wide jurisdiction when operating pursuant to state authority. The body has the power to fix, establish, or control the rates and services of utility suppliers.

(b) *Independent Regulatory Body determinations.* The requirements of the Disputes clause at FAR 52.233-1 are supplemented to provide that matters involving the interpretation of tariffed retail rates, tariff rate schedules, and tariffed terms provided under this contract are subject to any determinations by the independent regulatory body having jurisdiction.

(End of Clause)

[85 FR 60078, Sept. 24, 2020]