alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Elias Rasabi, Appellant, v Shlomo Rasabi, Also Known as Steve Rasabi, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. Steve Rasabi et al., Respondents, v Elias Rasabi, Also Known as Elias Rasaby, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[776 NYS2d 803]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York *452County (Paula J. Omansky, J.), entered April 2, 2003, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, dismissed the complaint, declared Elias Rasabi and Shlomo/Steve Rasabi tenants in common of a certain building, directed its partition but stayed partition and sale pending a determination of the rights of Sivan and Zipora Rasaby, appointed a temporary receiver, and directed that Elias Rasabi provide an accounting; order and judgment (one paper), same court and Justice, entered April 16, 2003, which, after a nonjury trial in a separate action, declared two leases null and void as fraudulent under Debtor and Creditor Law § 276, awarded Steve Rasabi attorneys’ fees pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law § 276-a, and dismissed the counterclaims in that action; and judgment, same court and Justice, entered September 26, 2003, which awarded Steve Rasabi attorneys’ fees in the amount of $102,898, unanimously affirmed, all with one bill of costs payable by appellants to the Rasabi respondents. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered September 23, 2003, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The trial court’s findings, resting largely on credibility determinations, are supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Thoreson v Penthouse Intl.,*80 NY2d 490, 495 [1992]). Reformation of the deed was unwarranted since the evidence showed that Elias Rasabi was aware of the correct title and there was thus neither mutual mistake nor scrivener’s error *(cf. Ebasco Constructors v Aetna Ins. Co.,*260 AD2d 287, 290 [1999]). Moreover, there was no need for reformation under the October 12, 1999 agreement, which clearly supplanted a prior agreement. The October agreement was valid, as the court had earlier found in dismissing the defense of duress *(see Benjamin Goldstein Prods. v Fish,*198 AD2d 137, 138 [1993]). In any event, the agreement was ratified *(see Matter of Guttenplan,*222 AD2d 255, 257 [1995], *lv denied*88 NY2d 812 [1996]). These leases, entered on terms extraordinarily favorable to the! tenants (a relative and a friend), for meager consideration and without any apparent commercial purpose, with the purported lessor retaining most of the elements of control, were replete with “Madges of fraud” *(see Insilco Corp. v Star Servs., Inc. of Del.,*2 AD3d 343, 344 [2003]; *Wall St. Assoc. v Brodsky,*257 AD2d 526 [1999]; *see also West 56th & 57th St. Corp. v Pearl,*242 AD2d 508 [1997]).

We have considered appellants’ other contentions and find them unavailing.

Motion seeking to amend this Court’s order of April 13, 2004 (M-1327) and to add Mark Fischler as a party to these appeals granted. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
904.7003 Disclosure of foreign ownership, control, or influence. ( a ) If a contract requires a contractor to have a Facility Clearance, DOE must determine whether the contractor is or may be subject to foreign ownership, control or influence before a contract can be awarded.
( b ) If, during the performance of a contract, the contractor comes under FOCI, then the DOE must determine whether a continuation of the Facility Clearance may pose an undue risk to the common defense and security through the possible compromise of that information or material. If the DOE determines that such a threat or potential threat exists, the contracting officer shall consider the alternatives of negotiating an acceptable method of isolating the foreign interest which owns, controls, or influences the contractor or terminating the contract.
( c ) It is essential for the DOE to obtain information about FOCI which is sufficient to help the Department determine whether award of a contract to a person or firm, or the continued performance of a contract by a person or firm, may pose undue risk to the common defense and security. Therefore, the provision specified at 952.204-73 Facility Clearance, shall be included in solicitations that involve offeror(s) or contractors that are subject to 904.7001.
( d ) The contracting officer shall not award or extend any contract subject to this subpart, exercise any options under a contract, modify any contracts subject to this subpart, or approve or consent to a subcontract subject to this subpart unless— ( 1 ) The contractor provides the information required by the solicitation provision at 952.204-73 Facility Clearance, and
( 2 ) The contracting officer has made a positive determination in accordance with 904.7004.
[49 FR 11941, Mar. 28, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9104, Feb. 25, 1994; 62 FR 42073, Aug. 5, 1997; 67 FR 14876, Mar. 28, 2002; 74 FR 36362, July 22, 2009]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10083 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10083

    To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to prohibit certain 
 advertising with respect to the Immigration Detention Ombudsman, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 1, 2024

   Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Owens, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Higgins of 
 Louisiana, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Norman, Mr. Weber of 
  Texas, Mr. Brecheen, and Mr. Harris) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition 
to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to prohibit certain 
 advertising with respect to the Immigration Detention Ombudsman, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Funding for Illegal Migrant 
Billboards Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN ADVERTISING WITH RESPECT TO THE 
              IMMIGRATION DETENTION OMBUDSMAN.

    Section 405 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 205) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Advertisement.--The Secretary may not obligate or expend any 
funds to advertise to the general public, by billboard or otherwise, 
the office or functions of the Ombudsman.''.
                                 <all>
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Comprehensive Centers Program      

# Comprehensive Centers Program

This program awards discretionary grants to establish comprehensive technical assistance centers to help low-performing schools and districts close achievement gaps and meet the goals of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Awards have been given to Fifteen (15) Regional Centers to provide technical assistance to States within defined geographic boundaries; and Five (5) content focused centers to provide expert assistance to benefit States and districts nationwide on key issues related to the goals of NCLB.

http://www.ed.gov/programs/newccp/index.html
923.570-3 Suspension of payments, termination of contract, and debarment and suspension actions. ( a ) The contracting officer shall comply with the procedures of FAR 23.506 regarding the suspension of contract payments, the termination of the contract for default, and the debarment and suspension of a contractor relative to failure to comply with 970.5223-4, Workplace Substance Abuse Programs at DOE Sites.
( b ) For purposes of 10 CFR part 707, the specific causes for suspension of contract payments, termination of the contract for default, and debarment and suspension of the contractor are— ( 1 ) The contractor fails to either comply with the requirements of 10 CFR part 707 or perform in a manner consistent with its approved program;
( 2 ) The contractor has failed to comply with the terms of the clause at 970.5223-4, Workplace Substance Abuse Programs at DOE Sites; or
( 3 ) Such a number of contractor employees having been convicted of violations of criminal drug statutes for violations occurring on the DOE-owned or -controlled site, as to indicate that the contractor has failed to make a good faith effort to provide a drug free workplace.
[57 FR 32676, July 22, 1992, as amended at 62 FR 42074, Aug. 5, 1997; 65 FR 81007, Dec. 22, 2000; 74 FR 36365, July 22, 2009; 75 FR 69012, Nov. 10, 2010]
#### Ardelle Allenson, Individually, and as Guardian ad Litem of Wendy J. Allenson, an Infant, Respondent, v. Robert M. Furman et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts, the decision vacated, and the complaint dismissed on the law with costs to defendants-appellants. The sudden and high speed traverse of the highway by the second ear and its coming to rest directly in the path of the ear driven by defendant Furman resulted in an emergency not of his doing and not reasonably to have been anticipated by him. Confronted with the sudden emergency, this defendant was “not obliged to exercise the best judgment” *(Rowlands*v. Parks, 2 N Y 2d 64, 67.) As a matter of law, bearing in mind the distances between and the speed of the vehicles, and under all the circumstances, the defendant did not have reasonable opportunity for deliberate action to avoid this accident. On the record here, the plaintiff failed to establish actionable negligence on the part of defendants-appellants. (See *Rowlands*v. *Parks,*supra;*Meyer*v. *Whisnant,*307 N. Y. 369; *Wolfson*v. *Darnell,*15 A D 2d 516.) Settle order on notice. Concur •—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.
EXHIBIT
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of US Biodefense, Inc., a Utah corporation (the
      "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended November 30, 2007 (the "Form
      10-KSB/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
      in the Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      February 11, 2008






By:
      /s/
      Scott Gallagher


------------------------------------


Scott
      Gallagher


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Acting
      Chief Financial Officer
#### 9.101 Definitions.

*Administrative proceeding* means a non-judicial process that is adjudicatory in nature in order to make a determination of fault or liability (*e.g.*, Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Proceedings, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings, and Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings). This includes administrative proceedings at the Federal and state level but only in connections with performance of a Federal contract or grant. It does not include agency actions such as contract audits, site visits, corrective plans, or inspection of deliverables.

*Surveying activity,* as used in this subpart, means the cognizant contract administration office or, if there is no such office, another organization designated by the agency to conduct preaward surveys.

[48 FR 42142, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 2128, Jan. 10, 2001; 75 FR 14065, Mar. 23, 2010]
#### 970.1707 Strategic Partnership Projects.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

l1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

139090 

& (27) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139090 

 COA: 290348 

Jackson CC: 06-004467-FC 

EARL LEE HOWARD, JR., 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for remand to 

the trial court is DENIED.
641.201 Policy. ( d ) The Procurement Executive is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 41.201(d)(2)(i) and FAR 41.201(d)(3).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10404 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10404

   To amend title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide 
program eligibility for distance education programs offered by foreign 
                   institutions of higher education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2024

 Mr. Schneider (for himself and Mr. Smucker) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide 
program eligibility for distance education programs offered by foreign 
                   institutions of higher education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Distance Education for 
Foreign Institutions Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS OFFERED BY FOREIGN 
              INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION.

    Section 481(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1088(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
    ``(4)(A) An otherwise eligible program that is offered by a foreign 
institution and is offered in part through distance education is 
eligible for the purposes of this title if--
            ``(i) not more than 12.5 percent of such program consists 
        of courses offered principally through distance education;
            ``(ii) the foreign institution has been evaluated and 
        determined by an outside oversight entity, such as an 
        accrediting agency or association or government entity, to have 
        the capability to effectively deliver distance education 
        programs; and
            ``(iii) the students receiving aid under this title are 
        physically present in the country where the foreign institution 
        is located during the distance education instruction.
    ``(B) In calculating the percentage of a program offered through 
distance education for purposes of clause (i) of subparagraph (A), any 
course that is part of such a program that requires a student's regular 
in-person attendance for more than 50 percent of the instruction, but 
also includes one or more distance education components as part of the 
course, shall not be considered to be offered principally through 
distance education.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### LANE, Respondent, v. YONKERS R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

Action by Ellen Lane against the Yonkers Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order of the City Court of Yonkers reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, for error in ruling at folio 100. See Morris v. Railway Co., 148 N. Y. 88, 42 N. E. 410, 51 Am. St. Rep. 675.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance, 2011      

# Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance, 2011

This report by the Department of Health and Human Services and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention presents statistics and trends for sexually transmitted diseases in the United States through 2011. 

http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats11/Surv2011.pdf
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

November 2, 2011

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta and WestJet
For Statements of Authorization
Docket DOT-OST-2011-0199

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Bob Finamore, DOT Don Hainbach, Counsel to WestJet
info@airlineinfo.com
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: College Completion Toolkit: Promising Practices for Improving Student Degree Attainment      

# Resource: College Completion Toolkit: Promising Practices for Improving Student Degree Attainment

This toolkit (PDF, 32 pages) highlights promising practices used by schools across the U.S. to increase college completion. With links to resources and stories written by the institutions themselves, the toolkit can help colleges and universities as they seek to promote student degree completion. 

http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/AdultEd/college-completion-toolkit.pdf?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links