alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
================================================================================
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
company's  financial  statements as of and for the 6 months ended  September 30,
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
================================================================================
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                 Apr-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                   Sep-30-1999

<CASH>                                                             164,911
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   36,754,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     1,298,172
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         0
<PP&E>                                                             658,342
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     484,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  36,753,427

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    0
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                        20,607,376

<OTHER-SE>                                                       1,619,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    36,753,427

<SALES>                                                          2,611,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 2,611,724
<CGS>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    35,720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    90,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 496,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  1,669,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     1,669,494

<EPS-BASIC>                                                          .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          .24


</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. M ARIO VALENC IA-OC H OA,

De fe nda nt-Appe l la

nt. No. 16-50007

D.C . No. 3:14-c r-02345-C AB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia C athy Ann B e nc ive ngo, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 26, 2016 ** B e fore : SC HR O EDER , C ANB Y, a n d C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s. M ario Va le nc ia -Oc h oa

a ppe a ls from

the distric t

c ourt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s the re voc ation of supervise d re le a se . W e have jurisdic t ion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a

nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED AUG 01 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Va le nc ia -Oc h oa c onte nds tha t 18 U.S.C . § 3583(e )(3), whic h provide s tha t a distric t c o urt m ay re voke supe rvise d re le a se and im pose a te rm of im prisonm e nt upon finding by

a pre ponde ranc e of the e vide n c e tha t thede fe nda

nt viola te d a c ondition of supe

rvise d re le a se , is unc onstitutiona l unde r Appre ndi v . N

e w J e rse y , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). As Va l e nc ia -Oc hoa

c onc e de s , this c l a im

is fore c lose d. Se e Unite d State s v . Santana , 526 F.3d 1257, 1262 (9th C ir. 2008). AFFIRM E D.

1 6 - 5 0 0 0 7 2
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Women and Girls of Color: Addressing Challenges and Expanding Opportunity      

# Women and Girls of Color: Addressing Challenges and Expanding Opportunity

“Women and Girls of Color: Addressing Challenges and Expanding Opportunity” (PDF, 54 pages) highlights the work the Obama Administration has done to reduce barriers for women and girls of color and to promote their success in a number of areas, including education, health, and economic security.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/cwg_women_and_girls_of_color_report_112014.pdf?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resouces
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Youth and the Juvenile Justice System: 2022 National Report      

# Resource: Youth and the Juvenile Justice System: 2022 National Report

This report (PDF, 226 pages) consists of the most requested information on youth and the juvenile justice system in the United States. The report provides a comprehensive view of youth victims and offending by youth, and what happens to youth when they enter the juvenile justice system in the U.S. **Learn more.**
#### 945.000 Scope of part.

This part and 48 CFR part 45 are not applicable to the management of property by management and operating contractors, unless otherwise stated.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Verisity Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles G. Alvarez, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                |  |                                                                                
|----- |  | -------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | March 11, 2005 |  | /s/    CHARLES G.
ALVAREZ                                                      
|      |  |                |  | Charles G. Alvarez                                                             
|      |  |                |  | Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
"CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND
CONSOLIDATED" STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               2,717,033
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                    881,200
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                  474,345
<OTHER-ASSETS>                            130,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          4,202,727
<COMMON>                                      539
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                 411,534
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                       685,696
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>          1,097,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                42,348
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                    1,192,003
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                        281,637
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>          1,588,970
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>           4,202,727
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                 804,234
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                       17,521
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                741,212
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                758,733
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                    45,501
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                          3,421
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>             48,922
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   18,309
<NET-INCOME>                               30,613
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   858
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>              29,755
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   54,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   5,199
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                    243,345
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.00


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                                ANDRX CORPORATION
                                4955 ORANGE DRIVE
                            FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33314



                                                    March 28, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:


         In connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended, we have received
representations from Arthur Andersen LLP, our independent public accountants
that (i) this audit was subject to Arthur Andersen LLP's quality control system
for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance
that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, and
(ii) that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen LLP personnel
working on the audit and national office consultation. Availability of personnel
at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen LLP was not relevant to this audit.

                                 Very truly yours,

                                 ANDRX CORPORATION


                                 By:  /s/ Angelo C. Malahias
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                      Angelo C. Malahias
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney Stevenson, Appellant.

[779 NYS2d 498]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), rendered October 1, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Giacobbe, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea is vacated, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is granted, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for the purpose of entering an order, in its discretion, pursuant to CEL 160.50.

Initially, it is noted that the defendant did not waive his right to appeal at the time of the plea.

Contrary to the prosecution’s contentions, the arresting detective did not have reasonable suspicion to believe that the defendant had committed or was about to commit a crime *(see People v Harris,*149 AD2d 730 [1989]; *People v Lewis,*49 AD2d 558 [1975]). As the detective sat in an unmarked minivan, he observed the defendant walk past the van, and he noted that the defendant had a bulge in the center of his waistband. The detective saw the defendant adjust his clothing around the bulge several times. The detective did not indicate that the bulge had the outline of a weapon, and he was unable to describe it in any further detail. These observations were readily susceptible of an innocent as well as a guilty explanation, and therefore were not sufficient to permit the detective to forcibly detain or frisk the defendant *(see People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210, 216 [1976]; *People v Moore,*176 AD2d 297, 299 [1991]).

*821Under *People v De Bour (supra*at 223), and *People v Hollman*(79 NY2d 181, 184-185 [1992]), the detective’s observations justified, at most, a common-law inquiry to determine whether criminal activity was afoot. Therefore, the detective acted properly when he approached the defendant and asked him if he had a weapon. However, when the defendant did not respond, the detective placed him against a fence and frisked him. The defendant had the right to refuse to answer the detective’s questions, and the fact that he did not answer did not justify a further intrusion *(see People v Howard,*50 NY2d 583, 586 [1980], *cert denied*449 US 1023 [1980]; *see also Matter of Melissa O.,*217 AD2d 1 [1995]). Accordingly, in the absence of any testimony which would indicate that the detective was in fear for his safety or had other information indicative of criminality, the stop and frisk of the defendant was not justified, and the evidence which was obtained therefore should have been suppressed. Ritter, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           PPRER004156      

# PPRER004156

Anderman, E. M., Lane, D. R., Zimmerman, R., Cupp, P. K.,  Phebus, V. (2009). Comparing the efficacy of permanent classroom teachers to temporary health educators for pregnancy and HIV prevention instruction. Health Promotion Practice, 10(4), 597-605.

N/ADid not meet the review's screening criteria
9.400 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart— ( 1 ) Prescribes policies and procedures governing the debarment and suspension of contractors by agencies for the causes given in 9.406-2 and 9.407-2;
( 2 ) Provides for the listing of contractors debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, and declared ineligible (see the definition of *ineligible* in 2.101); and
( 3 ) Sets forth the consequences of this listing.
( b ) Although this subpart does cover the listing of ineligible contractors (9.404) and the effect of this listing (9.405), it does not prescribe policies and procedures governing declarations of ineligibility except for contractors that have been declared ineligible pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 983 (see 9.110, and 9.405-1(b)).
( c ) For Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act (FASCSA) orders, see subpart 4.23.
[48 FR 42142, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 19814, May 8, 1989; 66 FR 2128, Jan. 10, 2001; 85 FR 67621, Oct. 23, 2020; 86 FR 3678, Jan. 14, 2021; 88 FR 69513, Oct. 5, 2023]
EXHIBIT 15




May 12, 2000




Pennsylvania Power Company
1 E. Washington Street
P. O. Box 891
New Castle, PA  16103

Gentlemen:

We are aware that Pennsylvania Power Company has incorporated by reference
in its Registration Statements No. 33-62450 and No. 33-65156 its Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, which includes our report dated May
12, 2000 covering the unaudited interim financial information contained
therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report
is not considered a part of the registration statements prepared or
certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within
the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                   Very truly yours,




                                   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
#### 915.404-4-72 Special considerations for cost-plus-award-fee contracts.

(a) When a contract is to be awarded on a cost-plus-award-fee basis several special considerations are appropriate. Fee objectives for management and operating contracts or other contracts as determined by the Senior Procurement Executive, including those using the Construction, Construction Management, or Special Equipment Purchases/Subcontract Work schedules from 915.404-4-71-5, shall be developed pursuant to the procedures set forth in 970.15404-4-8. Fee objectives for other cost-plus-award-fee contracts shall be in accordance with 916.405-2 and be developed as follows:

(1) The base fee portion of the fee objective of an award fee contract may range from 0% up to the 50% level of the fee amount for a Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) contract, arrived at by using the weighted guidelines or other techniques (such as those provided in 915.404-4-71 for construction and construction management contracts). However, the base amount should not normally exceed 50% of the otherwise applicable fixed fee. In the event this 50% limit is exceeded, appropriate documentation shall be entered into the contract file. In no event shall the base fee exceed 60% of the fixed fee amount.

(2) The base fee plus the amount included in the award fee pool should normally not exceed the fixed fee (as subjectively determined or as developed from the fee schedule) by more than 50%. However, in the event the base fee is to be less than 50% of the fixed fee, the maximum potential award fee may be increased proportionately with the decreases in base fee amounts.

(3) The following maximum potential award fees shall apply in award fee contracts: (percent is stated as percent of fee schedule amounts).

| Base fee percent | Award fee percent | Maximum total percentage |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 50 | 100 | 150 |
| 40 | 120 | 160 |
| 30 | 140 | 170 |
| 20 | 160 | 180 |
| 10 | 180 | 190 |
| 0 | 200 | 200 |

(b) Prior approval of the Senior Procurement Executive, is required for total fee (base plus award fee pool) exceeding the guidelines in 915.404-4-72(a)(3).

[63 FR 56851, Oct. 23, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 12229, Mar. 11, 1999; 74 FR 36364, 36378, July 22, 2009; 76 FR 7693, Feb. 11, 2011]