alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 4, 2009
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1793
MARTINA D. EVANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY; TONI GIORDANO; RAY VALLE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-95- 2318-L) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Martina D. Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Stephen Harrison, Francis William Connolly, SHAWE & ROSENTHAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appellees' motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and deny Appellees' motion to strike. Evans v. USF&G Co. , No. CA-95-2318-L (D. Md. Apr. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CENTEX
CORPORATION'S JUNE 30, 1997, FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000018532
<NAME> CENTEX CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          42,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,041,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,086,299
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         502,021
<DEPRECIATION>                                 204,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,836,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        240,530
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,320
<OTHER-SE>                                     859,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,836,826
<SALES>                                        861,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               861,375
<CGS>                                          795,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  795,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,873
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,419
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,409
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,010
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Carl Ceragno, President, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the company, hereby certify that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Communications Research, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

         (2)      That information contained in such Annual Report on Form
                  10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial
                  condition and results of operations of Communications
                  Research, Inc.

March 30, 2005
                                          By: /s/ Carl R. Ceragno
                                              -------------------
                                              Name: Carl R. Ceragno
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Chief Financial Officer
9.502 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to contracts with either profit or nonprofit organizations, including nonprofit organizations created largely or wholly with Government funds.
( b ) The applicability of this subpart is not limited to any particular kind of acquisition. However, organizational conflicts of interest are more likely to occur in contracts involving— ( 1 ) Management support services;
( 2 ) Consultant or other professional services;
( 3 ) Contractor performance of or assistance in technical evaluations; or
( 4 ) Systems engineering and technical direction work performed by a contractor that does not have overall contractual responsibility for development or production.
( c ) An organizational conflict of interest may result when factors create an actual or potential conflict of interest on an instant contract, or when the nature of the work to be performed on the instant contract creates an actual or potential conflict of interest on a future acquisition. In the latter case, some restrictions on future activities of the contractor may be required.
( d ) Acquisitions subject to unique agency organizational conflict of interest statutes are excluded from the requirements of this subpart.
[48 FR 42142, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 42686, Oct. 22, 1990; 56 FR 55377, Oct. 25, 1991; 84 FR 19845, May 6, 2019]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6694

WALTER E. PATTERSON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-99-696-3)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter E. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell

Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Walter E. Patterson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Patterson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Patterson v. Angelone, No. CA-99-696-3 (E.D. Va. Apr.

17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### 43.106 [Reserved]
#### 826.202-2 Evaluation preference.

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8128, the contracting officer shall include evaluation factors in accordance with 815.304 and the evaluation criteria clause prescribed at 815.304-71(a), 852.215-70, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned Small Business Evaluation Factors.
970.5070-3 Contract clauses. ( a ) The clause at 952.250-70, Nuclear Hazards Indemnity Agreement, shall be included in all management and operating contracts involving the risk of public liability for the occurrence of a nuclear incident or precautionary evacuation arising out of or in connection with the contract work, including such events caused by a product delivered to a DOE-owned, facility for use by DOE or its contractors. The clause at 952.250-70 also shall be included in any management and operating contract for the design of a DOE facility, the construction or operation of which may involve the risk of public liability for a nuclear incident or a precautionary evacuation.
( b ) The clause at 952.250-70 shall not be included in contracts in which the contractor is subject to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) financial protection requirements under section 170b. of the Act or NRC agreements of indemnification under section 170 c. or k. of the Act for activities to be performed under the contract.
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36374, July 22, 2009]
#### William Carbonell v. F. M. Charlton Co., Inc., et al.

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted only insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, upon condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the attorney for respondents and files 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellant’s points with this court. Concur — Rabin, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       6,950,761
<SECURITIES>                                 1,662,319
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,797,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                   116,393
<INVENTORY>                                  3,497,701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,120,473
<PP&E>                                      18,434,537
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,462,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,106,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,905,571
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,171,496
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,998,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,106,877
<SALES>                                      4,700,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,807,028
<CGS>                                        3,212,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,349,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (154,625)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                611,773
<INCOME-TAX>                                   230,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            381,773
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   381,773
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
        

</TABLE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           PDUMMY999999      

# PDUMMY999999

### Evaluation Setting

### Study Sample
#### Margaret Carroll, Respondent, v. William T. Shaw et al., Doing Business as Left Field Tavern, Appellants, and Thomas Tiernan, Respondent.

— Amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 16, 1966, reversed insofar as it is in favor of plaintiff against defendants Shaw and O’Sullivan, on the law, without costs, and new trial and severance directed as between plaintiff and said defendants; and judgment otherwise affirmed, without costs. This court has considered the question of fact and would not grant a new trial upon those questions. It is our opinion that it was error for the trial court to charge the jury that violation of the statute and ordinance relating to fireworks (Penal Law, § 1894-a, subd. 2; Administrative Code of the City of New York, § C19-44.0) may be evidence of negligence against defendants Shaw and O’Sullivan. There is no evidence in the record from which a violation of the statute or ordinance by said defendants can be found. The verdict being a general one, we have no way of knowing the basis for the jury’s determination of liability. It is possible that it was based upon the erroneous charge. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           OJJDP Updates National DMC Data to Statistical Briefing Book      

# OJJDP Updates National DMC Data to Statistical Briefing Book

.The OJJDP Statistical Briefing Book added new features to its National Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) DatabookThis application presents the national DMC data for the juvenile justice system and their Relative Rate Index Matrices that quantify levels of racial disparity introduced at various decision points within the system. This update provides data through 2013 and makes available new features, including DMC tables for combinations of gender and race for juvenile court stages, and tables comparing males to females for juvenile arrest and court stages. 

http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/dmcdb/?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
Exhibit 10.23

Global Wataire Inc.

Employment Agreement

FOR
CFO

Dear Mr. Gorman:

The following employment agreement between Global Wataire Inc. (The Company or GW) and Edmund Gorman outlines the terms of your contract as CFO of the company.

1.

Position

You will be appointed as CFO of the Company. Term

The appointment shall be for a term of Twenty-four month (Two years) commencing on the 25 day of August 2007.

Compensation

a)

Annual compensation ofUS 150,000 annually, to be invoiced by you to the Company at the rate of S 12,500.00 monthly. This compensation rate will be reviewed annually by the Board of Directors, the first such review to occur within twelve months of the starting date.

b)

You will be entitled to participate in the company's stock option plan whengrants are determined by the Board of Directors.

c)

You will he entitled to a cash or stock bonus of up to 50% of your annualcompensation if and when granted by the Board of Directors subject to the achievement of annual performance criteria as approved by the Board.

d)

You will invoice the company periodically for you're out of pocket expensessuch as travel, meals and entertainment and other such expenses related to the execution of your duties.

e)

You will be entitled to receive a payment of $7,500.00 annually as health anddental allowance.

4.

on competition

The Contract will contain the usual provision prohibiting you from competing with the company anywhere in the world for a period of two (2) years from the expiry or termination of your services.

5.

Duties

·

Day to day financial management of the company

·

Preparation of financial reports, forecasts, budgets etc. to ensure effectivemanagement and financial reporting

·

Supervisionoffinance department staff

·

Assure compliance with all regulatory authorities

·

Liaison with auditors, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Board ofDirectors, Investors and financial institutions

·

Any other duties as determined by the CEO

h.

Termination for any reason

The Company shall have the right to terminate your contract at any time with a payment of twice your remaining compensation rate at the time of termination. These payments will be in the form of either cash or company stock or any

combination thereof as determined by the Board of Directors at that time

Termination by Employee

The Employee shall provide a minimum of two (2) months notice of his desire to terminate the contract.

Please sign this letter below to indicate your agreement with thi.. above terms. Yours, truly,

[ex1022004.gif]

Sydney Harland President & CEO Global Wataire Inc.

Agreed this 25 day of August, 2007.

[ex1022002.gif]



[ex1022006.gif]
#### In the Matter of Louis S., Appellant.

Order, Family Court, New York County, entered September 29, 1977, adjudging the appellant to be a juvenile delinquent for committing the equivalent of first degree robbery and sentencing him to two years’ probation, reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new hearing, without costs. The appellant was charged with forcibly stealing a bicycle on the East River Drive on the lower east side of Manhattan. The complainant identified him. The defense was an alibi. It was contended that the appellant, with his sister, went to a shop on 34th Street to buy a present for their mother, and then took the subway up to 86th Street to meet the sister’s boyfriend for lunch. The trial court considered the alibi "inherently incredible”. This was an a priori conclusion. It was not beyond the realm of possibility that this juvenile would shop, even though it was the first time, for a present for his mother on 34th Street. The court having applied ari erroneous intuitive standard to the evidence, we reverse and remand for a new hearing. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Lane and Bloom, JJ.