alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION

I, William E. Hantke, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Premcor Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
     controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
     that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

b)   [Intentionally Omitted];

c)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

d)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: July 25, 2003                              /s/ William E. Hantke
     ----------------------                      -------------------------------
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                       2
#### 750.7109 Submission of requests by contractors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's March 31, 2000 consolidated financial statements and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,851
<INVENTORY>                                     14,433
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,781
<PP&E>                                          27,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,175
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           323
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,994
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,035
<SALES>                                         14,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,809
<CGS>                                            8,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,244)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,244)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,244)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1





SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





In
      connection with the annual report of Global Food Technologies, Inc. ("Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the
      capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their
      knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated
      May
      15, 2008




/s/
Keith
              MeeksKeith
                Meeks, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/
Marshall
              F. SparksMarshall
                F. Sparks, Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Etta Rand, Appellant.

Judgment convicting defendant of the crime of petit larceny, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and the information dismissed. Viewed in the light of the concession made on argument to the effect that a reversal would be consented to if the defendant would sign a release, and that, indeed, such release had been the subject of negotiation before defendant was put to trial, the court feels that the interests of justice require a reversal. In addition, some of the court are of the opinion that the evidence failed to establish the guilt of defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur—• Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.
#### KORBER v. J. OTTMAN LITHOGRAPHING CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.

February 27, 1906.)

Master and Servantj-Fellow Servants—Superintendent—Negligence.

Though defendant’s superintendent might have been its representative in all matters which it was the master’s duty to perform, still his act in negligently holding or failing to hold the ladder on which plaintiff was standing at the time of the accident was not an act which pertained to the duty of the master to perform, but was the act of a fellow servant.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 34, Cent. Dig. Master and Servant, §§ 427-430.]

Appeal from City Court of New York, Special Term.

Action by Edward Korber against J. Ottman Lithographing Company for injuries received while in the employment of defendant. From an order denying a motion for new trial, defendant appeals.

Reversed.

Argued before SCOTT, P. J., and GIEGERICH and GREEN-BAUM, JJ.

William A. Jones, Jr. (David M. Wolff, of counsel), for appellant.

August P. Wagener (Frank Herwig, of counsel), for respondent.

GIEGERICH, J.

I cannot distinguish this case from Hussey v. Coger, 112 N. Y. 614, 20 N. E. 556, 3 L. R. A. 559, 8 Am. St. Rep. 787, and Crispin v. Babbitt, 81 N. Y. 516, 37 Am. Rep. 521. Although the superintendent might have been the representative of the defendant corporation in all matters which it was the master’s duty to perform, still his act in negligently holding, or failing to hold, the ladder on which the plaintiff was standing at the time of the accident was not an act which pertained to the duty of a master to perform, but was the act of a fellow servant; like the act of the superintendent in the Hussey Case in leaving the hatch open, and the Crispin Case in starting the machinery while the plaintiff was in a position of danger.

The order should be reversed, with costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion granted. All cpncur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Virtual Learning Lab for Campus Suicide Prevention      

# Resource: Virtual Learning Lab for Campus Suicide Prevention

This virtual module guides colleges and universities in creating comprehensive approaches to suicide prevention. Developed by the Suicide Prevention Resource Center, it includes step-by-step guidance, activities, worksheets, and examples to help campuses set goals, plan, and implement effective suicide prevention programs and trainings. 

http://www.sprc.org/virtuallearninglab/campus-suicide-prevention?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links
#### 52.229-13 Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan.

As prescribed in 29.402-4(a), use the following clause:

# Taxes—Foreign Contracts in Afghanistan (NOV 2021)

(a)* Definition. U.S. Forces,* as used in this clause, means the entity comprising the members of the force and of the civilian component, and all property, equipment, and materiel of the United States Armed Forces present in the territory of Afghanistan.

(b) *Tax exemption.* This acquisition is covered by the Security and Defense Cooperation Agreement (the Agreement) between the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (Afghanistan) and the United States of America signed on September 30, 2014, and entered into force on January 1, 2015.

(1) The Agreement exempts the United States Government, and its contractors and subcontractors (other than those that are Afghan legal entities or residents), from paying any tax or similar charge assessed by the Government of Afghanistan on activities associated with this contract within Afghanistan if the activities are on behalf of or in support of U.S. Forces. The Agreement also exempts the acquisition, importation, exportation, reexportation, transportation, and use of supplies and services in Afghanistan, on behalf of or in support of U.S. Forces, from any taxes, customs, duties, fees, or similar charges imposed by the Government of Afghanistan.

(2) The Contractor shall exclude any Afghan taxes, customs, duties, fees, or similar charges from the contract price, other than those charged to Afghan legal entities or residents.

(3) The Agreement does not exempt Afghan employees of Government contractors and subcontractors from Afghan tax laws. To the extent required by Afghan law, the Contractor shall withhold tax from the wages of these employees and remit those payments to the appropriate Afghan taxing authority. These withholdings are an individual's liability, not a tax against the Contractor.

(c) *Subcontracts.* The Contractor shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all subcontracts including subcontracts for ccommercial products or commercial services.

(End of clause)

[85 FR 67625, Oct. 23, 2020, as amended at 86 FR 61036, Nov. 4, 2021]
**INSTRUCTIONS FOR GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT**

Recipients of multi-year discretionary grants must submit an annual performance report for each year funding has been approved in order to receive a continuation award.  The annual performance report should demonstrate whether substantial progress has been made toward meeting the project objectives and the program performance measures.

**FORMS TO COMPLETE GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT (ED 524B)**

You must submit the ED 524B Cover sheet, Executive Summary, and the Project Status Chart.  You may reference sections and page numbers of your approved application rather than repeating information.	
**2023 NAM GPRA Performance Measures** (PDF, 94 KB)

**2021 NAM GPRA Performance Measures** (PDF, 108 KB)

**2018 NAM GPRA Performance Measures** (MS WORD, 15 KB)

**2016 NAM GPRA Performance Measures** (MS WORD, 25 KB)

Under the government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), Federal departments and agencies must clearly describe the goals and objectives of programs, identify resources and actions needed to accomplish goals and objectives, develop a means of measuring progress made, and regularly report on achievement. One important sources of program information on successes and lessons learned is the project evaluation conducted under individual grants.
  Last Modified: 02/17/2023
#### In re JUDICIAL SALESROOMS.

(Supren Court, Appellate Division, First Departmer

March 16, 1906.)

In the matter of judicial sal rooms.

No opinion. Application denied, wi leave to renew. Order filed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 121 (Thursday, June 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 40938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14635]

[[Page 40938]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at the Monroe Regional Airport at Monroe, Louisiana

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Request to Release Airport Property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the 
release of land at the Monroe Regional Airport at Monroe, Louisiana 
under the provisions of Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 22, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Lacey Spriggs, Manager, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, 
Louisiana/New Mexico Airports District Office, ASW-640, 10101 Hillwood 
Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to the Mr. Ron Phillips, Airport Manager, at the 
following address: 5400 Operations Road, Monroe, Louisiana 71203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Mr. Bill Bell, Lead Engineer, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Louisiana/New Mexico Airports District Office, 
ASW-640, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, Texas 76177, Telephone: 
(817) 222-5664, email: Bill.Bell@faa.gov, fax: (817) 222-5987.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this 
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the Monroe Regional Airport at Monroe, 
Louisiana under the provisions of the AIR 21.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The City of Monroe, Louisiana requests the release of 2.2 acres of 
non-aeronautical airport property. The land was acquired by Deed from 
the United States dated September 8, 1949. The property to be released 
will be sold and the funds will be used for the Airport's Bermuda 
Release program and purchase of a new tractor.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, 
notice and other documents relevant to the application in person at the 
Monroe Airport, Monroe, Louisiana, telephone number (318) 329-2460.

Ignacio Flores,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-14635 Filed 6-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Teen Dating Violence: How Peers Can Affect Risk & Protective Factors      

# Teen Dating Violence: How Peers Can Affect Risk & Protective Factors

This brief (PDF, 24 pages) draws on NIJ-funded research, as well as broader literature, to illustrate the ways teens shape each other’s relationship experiences and decisions to enter and leave romantic relationships that turn violent. 

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/248337.pdf?utm_source=Find%20Youth%20Info&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
(May 6, 2004)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ladale Kennedy, Defendant-Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 790]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John S. Moore, J.), entered on or about January 2, 2003, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment, same court and Justice, rendered March 7, 2000, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment pursuant to CEL 440.10 on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel *(see People v Satterfield,*66 NY2d 796, 799-800 [1985]). Even assuming that trial counsels failure to request submission of manslaughter in the second degree or criminally negligent homicide as lesser included offenses was not a strategic choice, we find that counsel’s omission did not deprive defendant of a fair trial or affect the outcome *(see People v Hobot,*84 NY2d 1021, 1024 [1995]; *People v Alicea,*229 AD2d 80, 89-90 [1997], *lv denied*90 NY2d 890 [1997]; see *also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). On defendant’s direct appeal, this Court concluded that defendant’s guilt of murder in the second degree was established at trial by overwhelming evidence *(People v Kennedy,*294 AD2d 283 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 698 [2002]). There is no reason to believe that the jury would have convicted defendant of anything less than intentional murder no matter what lesser offenses had been submitted *(see People v Ruiz,*223 AD2d 418 [1996], *lv denied*88 NY2d 853 [1996]). Moreover, the court did submit first degree manslaughter, and the jury rejected that option when it convicted defendant of murder. It is well settled that under such circumstances, failure to submit the more remote lesser offenses of second degree manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide would be deemed harmless *(see e.g. People v Vega,*155 AD2d 632 [1989], *lv denied*75 NY2d 819 [1990]). Concur—Buckley, EJ., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.