alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
50.205-1 SAFETY Act Considerations. ( a ) *SAFETY Act applicability.* Requiring activities should review requirements to identify potential technologies that prevent, detect, identify, or deter acts of terrorism or limit the harm such acts might cause, and may be appropriate for SAFETY Act protections. In questionable cases, the agency shall consult with DHS. For acquisitions involving such technologies, the requiring activity should ascertain through discussions with DHS whether a block designation or block certification exists for the technology being acquired. ( 1 ) If one does exist, the requiring activity should request that the contracting officer notify offerors.
( 2 ) If one does not exist, see 50.205-2, Pre-qualification designation notice.
( b ) *Early consideration of the SAFETY Act.* Acquisition officials shall consider SAFETY Act issues as early in the acquisition cycle as possible (*see* 7.105(b)(20)(v)). Normally, this would be at the point where the required capabilities or performance characteristics are addressed. This is important because the processing times for issuing determinations on all types of SAFETY Act applications vary depending on many factors, including the influx of applications to DHS and the technical complexity of individual applications.
( c ) *Industry outreach.* When applicable, acquisition officials should include SAFETY Act considerations in all industry outreach efforts including, but not limited to, requests for information, draft requests for proposal, and industry conferences.
( d ) *Reciprocal waiver of claims.* For purposes of 6 CFR 25.5(e), the Government is not a customer from which a contractor must request a reciprocal waiver of claims.
[72 FR 63030, Nov. 7, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 2738, Jan. 15, 2009; 76 FR 14547, Mar. 16, 2011]
9904.401-61 Interpretation. ( a ) 9904.401, Cost Accounting Standard—Consistency in Estimating, Accumulating and Reporting Costs, requires in 9904.401-40 that a contractor's “practices used in estimating costs in pricing a proposal shall be consistent with his cost accounting practices used in accumulating and reporting costs.”
( b ) In estimating the cost of direct material requirements for a contract, it is a common practice to first estimate the cost of the actual quantities to be incorporated in end items. Provisions are then made for additional direct material costs to cover expected material losses such as those which occur, for example, when items are scrapped, fail to meet specifications, are lost, consumed in the manufacturing process, or destroyed in testing and qualification processes. The cost of some or all of such additional direct material requirements is often estimated by the application of one or more percentage factors to the total cost of basic direct material requirements or to some other base.
( c ) Questions have arisen as to whether the accumulation of direct material costs in an undifferentiated account where a contractor estimates a significant part of such costs by means of percentage factors is in compliance with 9904.401. The most serious questions pertain to such percentage factors which are not supported by the contractor with accounting, statistical, or other relevant data from past experience, nor by a program to accumulate actual costs for comparison with such percentage estimates. The accumulation of direct costs in an undifferentiated account in this circumstance is a cost accounting practice which is not consistent with the practice of estimating a significant part of costs by means of percentage factors. This situation is virtually identical with that described in Illustration 9904.401-60(b)(5), which deals with labor.
( d ) 9904.401 does not, however, prescribe the amount of detail required in accumulating and reporting costs. The amount of detail required may vary considerably depending on the percentage factors used, the data presented in justification or lack thereof, and the significance of each situation. Accordingly, it is neither appropriate nor practical to prescribe a single set of accounting practices which would be consistent in all situations with the practices of estimating direct material costs by percentage factors. Therefore, the amount of accounting and statistical detail to be required and maintained in accounting for this portion of direct material costs has been and continues to be a matter to be decided by Government procurement authorities on the basis of the individual facts and circumstances.
#### 9904.413 Adjustment and allocation of pension cost.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Report: Public High School Students’ Use of Graduation, Career, or Education Plans

This report analyzes public high school students’ use of graduation, career, or education plans as of 2012. About 40% of students were required to create their own plan, 23% selected from plans offered, and 5% were assigned a plan by the school. Approximately 11% of students developed a plan they submitted and met with school staff at least annually to review or revise it. 

http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2017111&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
§ 1.325 Form, filing and service of papers. ( a ) *Form.* ( 1 ) The original and two copies of all papers in a proceeding conducted under this subpart shall be filed with the ALJ assigned to the case.
( 2 ) Every pleading and paper filed in the proceeding shall contain a caption setting forth the title of the action, the case number assigned by the ALJ, and a designation of the paper (e.g., motion to quash subpoena).
( 3 ) Every pleading and paper shall be signed by and shall contain the address and telephone number of the representative for the party or the person on whose behalf the paper was filed.
( 4 ) Papers are considered filed when they are mailed. Date of mailing may be established by a certificate from the party or his representative or by proof that the document was sent by certified or registered mail.
( b ) *Service.* A party filing a document with the ALJ shall, at the time of filing, serve a copy of such document on every other party. Service upon any party of any document other than the complaint or notice of hearing shall be made by delivering or mailing a copy to the party's last known address. When a party is represented by a representative, service shall be made upon such representative in lieu of the actual party.
( c ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the person serving the document by personal delivery or by mail, setting forth the manner of service, shall be proof of service.
#### NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; Mary Elston, Widow of Denmer Elston, Respondents.

No. 07-1360.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 19, 2007.

Decided: Nov. 13, 2007.

Jonathan H. Walker, Mason, Mason, Walker & Hedrick, P.C., Newport News, Virginia, for Petitioner. Jonathan L. Snare, Acting Solicitor of Labor, Allen H. Feldman, Associate Solicitor, Mark A. Reinhalter, Kathleen H. Kim, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.; Jennifer West Vincent, Patten, Wornom, Hatten & Diamonstein, LC, Newport News, Virginia, for Respondents.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of longshore survivor’s benefits on a claim filed by Mary Elston pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Board. *Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Director, OWCP,*No. 06-0577 (B.R.B. Feb. 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10474 

To require an annual report on the costs to the Department of State 

associated with producing required reports, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2024 

Mr. CASTRO of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To require an annual report on the costs to the Department 

of State associated with producing required reports, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of State 

5 Reporting Requirements Cost Transparency Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF COST ASSOCIATED WITH PRO7 DUCING REPORTS. 

8 (a) ESTIMATED COST OF REPORTS.—Beginning on 

9 October 1, 2026, and for the next three fiscal years, the 

10 Secretary of State shall require that any report produced 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 10474 IH

1 for external distribution, including for distribution to Con2 gress, includes the total estimated cost of producing such 

3 report and the estimated number of personnel hours. 

4 (b) ANNUAL TOTAL COST OF REPORTS.—Not later 

5 than 90 days after the end of each fiscal year, beginning 

6 with fiscal year 2025, and for the next three fiscal years, 

7 the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congres8 sional committees and the Committee on Appropriations 

9 of the Senate and the Committee on Appropriations of the 

10 House of Representatives an annual report listing the re11 ports issued for the prior fiscal year, the frequency of each 

12 report, the total estimated cost associated with producing 

13 such report, and the estimated number of personnel hours. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
----

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY**

**ACT OF 2002**

 In connection with the Annual Report of Nettron.com, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 as filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Edward D. Ford, Director of the Company, certify that:

             (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

            (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

                           /s/  Edward D. Ford

Edward D. Ford   Director   September 29, 2003 

  

----
#### 952.227-82 Rights to proposal data.

Pursuant to 927.7002(d), include this clause in any contract which the decision to make the award included consideration of a technical proposal.

# Rights to Proposal Data (APR 1994)

Except for technical data contained on pages ____ of the contractor's proposal dated ____ which are asserted by the contractor as being proprietary data, it is agreed that, as a condition of the award of this contract, and notwithstanding the provisions of any notice appearing on the proposal, the Government shall have the right to use, duplicate, disclose and have others do so for any purpose whatsoever, the technical data contained in the proposal upon which this contract is based.

[49 FR 12042, Mar. 28, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9109, Feb. 25, 1994; 62 FR 2312, Jan. 16, 1997]
II 

Calendar No. 246 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1105 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 13), 2023 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 

2000 to reauthorize the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog 

Grant Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Debbie Smith Act of 

5 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

7 Section 2(j) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimi8 nation Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 40701(j)) is amended by 

9 striking ‘‘fiscal years 2019 through 2024’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘fiscal years 2024 through 2029’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

HR 1105 PCS

1 SEC. 3. AUDITS TO PROTECT INTEGRITY OF GRANT 

2 AWARDS. 

3 Section 2(c)(4) of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimi4 nation Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 40701(c)(4)) is amended 

5 by striking ‘‘2022’’ and inserting ‘‘2029’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 

2023. 

Attest: KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 246 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1105 

AN ACT 

To amend the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination 

N

purposes. DNA Backlog Grant Program, and for other Act of 2000 to reauthorize the Debbie Smith 

OVEMBER 14 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 13), 2023 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Leaders Talk about Health Literacy      

# Resource: Leaders Talk about Health Literacy

CDC’s “Leaders Talk about Health Literacy” web page features information from HHS leaders that can guide offices in developing and promoting health literacy guidelines and principles that align with the goals and strategies of the National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy.

http://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/leaders-talk-about-health-literacy.html?utm_source=youth.gov%60&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
#### The Foreman Trust & Savings Bank, administrator of the estate of Ralph Yushka, deceased, appellee, v. South Suburban Motor Coach Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 34,409.

Opinion filed April 15, 1931.

. Wetten, Pegler & Dale, for appellant.

Charles C. Spencer, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Friend

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    103,525
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,960
<PP&E>                                          71,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,886
<BONDS>                                         81,919
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,155
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,449
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   196,409
<SALES>                                        126,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,568
<CGS>                                           92,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,913
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,991
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,809
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,809
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Vivian M. Bratmeyer, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 910]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 16, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant voluntarily left her employment as a telemarketer without good cause. The record establishes that shortly after accepting a part-time job as a telemarketer, claimant was absent from work due to an injury she sustained at home. Following her recovery, claimant contacted her manager and informed him that she needed full-time employment in order to meet her financial obligations. When her request was not honored, claimant failed to return to work. It is well settled that neither dissatisfaction with the number of hours assigned by an employer *(see Matter of Cudnik [Sweeney],*235 AD2d 888, 888 [1997]) nor the amount of wages paid *(see Matter of Bollweg [Commissioner of Labor],*288 AD2d 811 [2001]; *Matter of Burman [Commissioner of Labor],*288 AD2d 539, 540 [2001]) constitutes good cause for leaving employment, particularly where, as here, claimant agreed to *875part-time employment when hired *(see Matter of Orlik [Commissioner of Labor],*257 AD2d 837 [1999]; *Matter of Cudnik [Sweeney], supra).*Claimant’s remaining contentions, including that her departure was not voluntary and she did not receive an impartial hearing, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Andrew Kay.

Assignment of M. Arthur Hammer, Esq., as counsel for the defendant-appellant, contained in the order of this court entered on May 24, 1962, vacated, and Howard Goldfluss, Esq., of 401 Broadway, New York, N. Y. is assigned as counsel for defendant-appellant in the place and stead of M. Arthur Hammer, Esq. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THTE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  AmBase  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P.
Ferrara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date:  May 14, 2008
                                                /s/ John P. Ferrara
                                                -------------------
                                                John P. Ferrara
                                                Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                AmBase Corporation