54652 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices 

Commenters are strongly encouraged 

to include the following information, as 

applicable: 

• If a physical market, the market’s 

name and location, e.g., common name, 

street address, neighborhood, shopping 

district, city, etc., and the identity of the 

principal owners/operators; 

• if an online market, the domain 

name(s) past and present, available 

registration information, and name(s) 

and location(s) of the hosting 

provider(s); 

• whether the physical or online 

market is owned, operated, or otherwise 

affiliated with a government entity; 

• types of counterfeit or pirated 

products or services sold, traded, 

distributed, or otherwise made available 

in or at that market; 

• volume of transactions in 

counterfeit or pirated goods or services 

or other indicia of a market’s scope, 

scale, or reach or relative significance in 

a given geographic area or with respect 

to a category of goods or services; if an 

online market, information on the 

volume and type of Internet traffic 

associated with the Web site, including 

number of visitors, number of page 

views, average time spent on the site by 

visitors, estimate of the number of 

infringing items sold or traded and 

number of files streamed, shared, 

seeded, leeched, downloaded, 

uploaded, or otherwise distributed or 

reproduced, and global or country 

popularity rating (e.g., Alexa rank); 

• if an online market, revenue sources 

such as sales, subscriptions, donations, 

upload incentives or advertising and the 

methods by which that revenue is 

collected; 

• estimates of economic harm to the 

rights holder resulting from the piracy 

or counterfeiting and a description of 

the methodology used to calculate the 

harm; 

• whether the goods or services sold, 

traded, distributed, or made available 

pose a risk to public health or safety; 

• any known contractual, civil, 

administrative, or criminal enforcement 

activity against the market and the 

effectiveness of that enforcement 

activity; 

• additional actions taken by the 

market owners or operators to remove, 

limit or discourage the availability of 

counterfeit or pirated goods or services, 

including removing or disabling access 

to such goods or services, issuing and 

enforcing guidelines prohibiting the 

posting of such goods or services, or 

cooperating in enforcement efforts; and 

• any additional information relevant 

to the review. 

c. Instructions for Submitting Comments 

Comments must be in English. To 

ensure the timely receipt and 

consideration of comments, USTR 

strongly encourages commenters to 

submit comments electronically, using 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. To 

submit comments via 

www.regulations.gov, enter Docket 

Number USTR–2015–0016 on the home 

page and click ‘‘Search.’’ The site will 

provide a search-results page listing all 

documents associated with this docket. 

Find the reference to this notice and 

click on the link entitled ‘‘Comment 

Now!.’’ For further information on using 

the www.regulations.gov Web site, 

please consult the resources provided 

on the site by clicking on ‘‘How to use 

Regulations.gov’’ at the bottom of the 

home page under ‘‘Help.’’ 

The www.regulations.gov Web site 

allows users to provide comments by 

filling in a ‘‘Type Comment’’ field, or by 

attaching a document using an ‘‘Upload 

File’’ field. USTR prefers that comments 

be provided in an attached document. If 

a document is attached, please type 

‘‘2015 Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious 

Markets’’ in the ‘‘Type Comment’’ field. 

USTR prefers submissions in Microsoft 

Word (.doc) or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) 

format. If the submission is in another 

file format, please indicate the name of 

the software application in the ‘‘Type 

Comment’’ field. File names should 

reflect the name of the person or entity 

submitting the comments. Please do not 

attach separate cover letters to 

electronic submissions; rather, include 

any information that might appear in a 

cover letter in the comments 

themselves. Similarly, to the extent 

possible, please include any exhibits, 

annexes, or other attachments in the 

same file as the comment itself, rather 

than submitting them as separate files. 

A person requesting that information 

contained in a comment submitted by 

that person be treated as confidential 

business information must certify that 

such information is business 

confidential and would not customarily 

be released to the public by the 

submitter. In the document, confidential 

business information must clearly be 

designated as such; the submission must 

be marked ‘‘BUSINESS 

CONFIDENTIAL’’ on the cover page and 

each succeeding page, and the 

submission should clearly indicate, via 

brackets, highlighting, or other means, 

the specific information that is business 

confidential. Additionally, the submitter 

should type ‘‘Business Confidential 

2015 Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious 

Markets’’ in the ‘‘Type Comment’’ field. 

Anyone submitting a comment 

containing business confidential 

information must also submit, as a 

separate submission, a non-business 

confidential version of the submission, 

indicating where the business 

confidential information has been 

redacted. The file names of both 

documents should reflect their status— 

‘‘BC’’ for the business confidential 

version and ‘‘P’’ for the public version. 

The non-business confidential version 

will be placed in the docket at 

www.regulations.gov and be available 

for public inspection. 

As noted, USTR strongly urges 

commenters to submit comments 

through www.regulations.gov. Any 

alternative arrangements must be made 

in advance of transmitting a comment 

and in advance of the relevant deadline 

by contacting USTR at Special301@

ustr.eop.gov. 

3. Inspection of Comments 

Comments received will be placed in 

the docket and open to public 

inspection pursuant to 15 CFR 2006.13, 

except business confidential 

information exempt from public 

inspection in accordance with 15 CFR 

2006.15. Comments may be viewed free 

of charge by visiting 

www.regulations.gov and entering 

Docket Number USTR–2015–0016 in the 

‘‘Search’’ field on the home page. 

Probir Mehta, 

Acting Assistant United States Trade 

Representative (AUSTR) for Intellectual 

Property and Innovation, Office of the United 

States Trade Representative. 

[FR Doc. 2015–22761 Filed 9–9–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3290–F5–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Noise Exposure Map Notice, Memphis 

International Airport, Memphis, TN 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) announces its 

determination that the Noise Exposure 

Maps submitted by Memphis-Shelby 

County Airport Authority for Memphis 

International Airport under the 

provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et. seq. 

(Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement 

Act) and 14 CFR part 150 are in 

compliance with applicable 

requirements. 

DATES: The effective date of the FAA’s 

determination on the noise exposure 

maps is September 1, 2015. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 175 / Thursday, September 10, 2015 / Notices 54653 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Phillip J. Braden, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Memphis Airports 

District Office, 2600 Thousand Oaks 

Blvd., Suite 2250, Memphis, Tennessee 

38118, 901–322–8181. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice announces that the FAA finds 

that the Noise Exposure Maps submitted 

for Memphis International Airport are in 

compliance with applicable 

requirements of Title 14 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) Part 150, effective 

September 1, 2015. Under 49 U.S.C. 

47503 of the Aviation Safety and Noise 

Abatement Act (the Act), an airport 

operator may submit to the FAA Noise 

Exposure Maps which meet applicable 

regulations and which depict 

noncompatible land uses as of the date 

of submission of such maps, a 

description of projected aircraft 

operations, and the ways in which such 

operations will affect such maps. The 

Act requires such maps to be developed 

in consultation with interested and 

affected parties in the local community, 

government agencies, and persons using 

the airport. An airport operator who has 

submitted Noise Exposure Maps that are 

found by FAA to be in compliance with 

the requirements of 14 CFR part 150, 

promulgated pursuant to the Act, may 

submit a Noise Compatibility Program 

for FAA approval which sets forth the 

measures the airport operator has taken 

or proposes to take to reduce existing 

noncompatible uses and prevent the 

introduction of additional 

noncompatible uses. 

The FAA has completed its review of 

the Noise Exposure Maps and 

accompanying documentation 

submitted by Memphis-Shelby County 

Airport Authority. The documentation 

that constitutes the ‘‘Noise Exposure 

Maps’’ as defined in Section 150.7 of 14 

CFR part 150 includes: ’’ Figure 2.1, 

Study Area Boundaries And 

Jurisdictions; Figure 2.2, Land Use In 

Memphis And Shelby County; Figure 

2.3, City of Southhaven Existing Land 

Use; Figure 2.4, City of Southhaven 

Noise Abatement Zone; Figure 2.5, City 

of Southhaven Future Land Use Plan; 

Figure 2.6, City of Southaven Proposed 

Land Use For Area 2; Figure 2.7, City of 

Horn Lake Proposed Land Use Map; 

Figure 2.8, Desoto County Existing Land 

Use Map; Figure 2.9, Desoto County 

Future Land Use Map; Figure 2.10, 

Noise Sensitive Sites; Figure 2.11, 

Mitigated Properties; Figure 3.1, 

Vicinity Map; Figure 3.2, Airport 

Diagram; Figure 3.3, Memphis Airspace; 

Figure 3.4, Daytime/Nightime 

Distribution By Aircraft Type; Figure 

3.5, Overall Runway Utilization; Figure 

3.6, North/East Flow Departures; Figure 

3.7, North/East Arrivals; Figure 3.8, 

South/West Flow Departures; Figure 

3.9, South/West Flow Arrivals; Figure 

3.10, Military Flight Tracks; Figure 3.11, 

Helicopter Flight Tracks; Figure 3.12, 

Run-Up Locations; Figure 3.13 Protected 

Areas and Departure Tracks; Figure 4.1, 

Noise Monitoring Locations; Figure 4.2, 

2013 Existing Contour Noise Exposure 

Map; Figure 4.3, Existing Condition 

NEM With Noise-Sensitive Sites; Figure 

4.4, 2013 Existing Condition NEM With 

Mitigated Properties; Figure 4.5, 2013 

Existing Condition NEM With 

Noncompatible Land Uses; Figure 5.1, 

Run-Up Locations; Figure 5.2, North/

East Flow Flight Tracks; Figure 5.3, 

South/West Flow Flight Tracks; Figure 

5.4, 2020 Future Condition Noise 

Exposure Map; Figure 5.5, Proposed 

Fedex Run-Up Location Noise Impacts; 

Figure 5.6, 2020 Future Condition NEM 

With Noise-Sensitive Sites; Figure 5.7, 

2020 Future Condition NEM With 

Mitigated Properties; Figure 5.8, 2020 

Future Condition NEM With 

Noncompatible Land Uses. The FAA 

has determined that these Noise 

Exposure Maps and accompanying 

documentation are in compliance with 

applicable requirements. This 

determination is effective on September 

1, 2015. 

FAA’s determination on the airport 

operator’s Noise Exposure Maps is 

limited to a finding that the maps were 

developed in accordance with the 

procedures contained in Appendix A of 

14 CFR part 150. Such determination 

does not constitute approval of the 

airport operator’s data, information or 

plans, or a commitment to approve a 

Noise Compatibility Program or to fund 

the implementation of that Program. If 

questions arise concerning the precise 

relationship of specific properties to 

noise exposure contours depicted on a 

Noise Exposure Map submitted under 

Section 47503 of the Act, it should be 

noted that the FAA is not involved in 

any way in determining the relative 

locations of specific properties with 

regard to the depicted noise exposure 

contours, or in interpreting the Noise 

Exposure Maps to resolve questions 

concerning, for example, which 

properties should be covered by the 

provisions of Section 47506 of the Act. 

These functions are inseparable from 

the ultimate land use control and 

planning responsibilities of local 

government. These local responsibilities 

are not changed in any way under 14 

CFR part 150 or through FAA’s review 

of Noise Exposure Maps. Therefore, the 

responsibility for the detailed 

overlaying of noise exposure contours 

onto the map depicting properties on 

the surface rests exclusively with the 

airport operator that submitted those 

maps, or with those public agencies and 

planning agencies with which 

consultation is required under Section 

47503 of the Act. The FAA has relied on 

the certification by the airport operator, 

under Section 150.21 of 14 CFR part 

150, that the statutorily required 

consultation has been accomplished. 

Copies of the full Noise Exposure 

Maps documentation and of the FAA’s 

evaluation of the maps are available for 

examination at the following locations: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 

Memphis Airports District Office, 2600 

Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 2250, 

Memphis, Tennessee 38118. 

Questions may be directed to the 

individual named above under the 

heading, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Issued in Memphis, Tennessee, on 

September 1, 2015. 

Phillip J. Braden, 

Manager, Memphis Airports District Office. 

[FR Doc. 2015–22825 Filed 9–9–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

MAP–21 Comprehensive Truck Size 

and Weight Limits Study Deadline for 

Submitting Comments for 

Consideration in the Report to 

Congress 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA); DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of deadline for 

submitting comments. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces a 

deadline for submitting comments to the 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

(DOT) for consideration as part of the 

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st 

Century Act (MAP–21) Comprehensive 

Truck Size and Weight Limits Study 

Report to Congress. On June 5, 2015, 

DOT released for public comment and 

peer review the technical results of a 

comprehensive study of certain safety, 

infrastructure, and efficiency issues 

surrounding the Federal truck size and 

weight limits and the potential impacts 

of changing those limits. The DOT is 

now preparing a Report to Congress to 

conclude this study. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before October 13, 2015 to receive 

full consideration by DOT with respect 

to the MAP–21 Comprehensive Truck 

Size and Weight Limits Study Report to 

Congress. The public docket will remain 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES