alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Vaccination Coverage among Adolescents      

# Report: Vaccination Coverage among Adolescents

This report assesses vaccination coverage among adolescents, aged 13-17 years, by analyzing data from the 2015*National Immunization Survey-Teen*. HPV vaccination increased among both males and females, but HPV vaccination coverage remained lower compared to the rates of other vaccinations. 

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/mm6533a4.htm?s_cid=mm6533a4_e&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-links
#### Xao He Lu, Appellant, v Steven B. Ross, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 64]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered July 25, 2003, dismissing the complaint pursuant to an order which, in an action to recover a portion of a fee paid on plaintiff’s behalf to defendant attorney, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the basis of documentary evidence, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff is not entitled to any refund of the amount paid defendant, since much more than that amount had been earned based on the hourly rates in the parties’ retainer agreement that were to apply if plaintiff discharged defendant, as he did, and plaintiff does not claim that defendant’s billing records do *295not accurately reflect the number of hours worked. We note that plaintiff does not allege any malpractice or breach of contract by defendant, only disagreements with him over litigation strategy and tactics. Nor can defendant’s nonparticipation in a bar association fee dispute proceeding estop him herein, where it appears that the complaint herein was defendant’s first notice of the bar association proceeding, and it does not appear that the bar association forum has made any rulings with respect to the merits of plaintiffs application. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Williams and Friedman, JJ.
#### 536.7105 Construction contract administration.
#### 632.702 Policy.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                                    22,865
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          22,865
<PP&E>                                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            22,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     19,500
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  52,336
<OTHER-SE>                                               (48,971)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              22,865
<SALES>                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          45,000
<CGS>                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          22,135
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           22,865
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                              22,865
<EPS-BASIC>                                               .004
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .004



</TABLE>
#### JETTER et al. v. SCALLON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 16, 1906.)

Action by George J. Jetter and another against John Seallon.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed.
873.112 Evaluation information. ( a ) Without regard to FAR 15.304, Evaluation factors and significant subfactors (except for 15.304(c)(1) and (c)(3), which do apply to acquisitions under this authority), the criteria, factors, or other evaluation information that apply to an acquisition, and their relative importance, are within the broad discretion of agency acquisition officials as long as the evaluation information is determined to be in the best interest of the Government. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( b ) Price or cost to the Government must be evaluated in every source selection. Past performance shall be evaluated in source selections for competitive acquisitions exceeding the SAT unless the contracting officer documents that past performance is not an appropriate evaluation factor for the acquisition. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( c ) The quality of the product or service may be addressed in source selection through consideration of information such as past compliance with solicitation requirements, technical excellence, management capability, personnel qualifications, and prior experience. The information required from quoters, bidders, or offerors shall be included in notices or solicitations, as appropriate. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( d ) The relative importance of any evaluation information included in a solicitation must be set forth therein. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
assert his accomplice's Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination, see Bowman v. United States, 350 F.2d 913, 915 (9th Cir. 1965) ("[T]he privilege against self-incrimination is personal to the witness."), he has failed to show that the district court's factual finding that he was fully Mirandized twice before being interrogated is clearly erroneous, see United States v. Connell, 869 F.2d 1349, 1351 (9th Cir. 1989) (reviewing a district court's factual findings underlying an adequacy of the Miranda warning challenge for clear error), and he has not demonstrated that his statements were illegally obtained or improperly admitted at tria1. 2

Second, Roy contends that insufficient evidence supports his convictions because his accomplice's testimony was not corroborated by independent evidence and was therefore inadmissible. The evidence necessary to corroborate accomplice testimony need not, by itself, be sufficient to establish guilt. Ramirez-Garza v. State, 108 Nev. 376, 379, 832 P.2d 392, 393 (1992). "If the evidence, independent of the accomplice testimony, tends to connect the accused with the commission of the offense, then the corroboration requirement contained in NRS 175.291 is satisfied." Id. Here, the victim testified that she lived in an apartment located in building 22 on 6661 Silverstream Avenue and that someone broke into her apartment and stole her belongings. Several LVMPD detectives testified that they were conducting surveillance on Roy on the

2 To the extent that Roy relies on excerpts from his suppression motion to prove that he was not properly advised of his Miranda rights, we note that "[fl acts or allegations contained in a brief are not evidence and are not part of the record." Phillips v. State, 105 Nev. 631, 634, 782 P.2d 381, 383 (1989).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2

### Douglas , J. J. (N.f

3

- -CS - 

### day of the break-in and observed him approach building 22 and later return from that building carrying something. And Roy testified that he was in the apartment on the day that it was broken into. We conclude that this independent evidence was sufficient to connect Roy to the commission of the offenses and thereby corroborate the accomplice's testimony. 3 Having concluded that Roy's contentions are without merit, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Gibbons

cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge Carl E.G. Arnold Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

3 

### We note that the accomplice testified as a rebuttal witness.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A Off:IMMESH=
#### In the Matter of Ann Wenger, Respondent-Appellant, v Louis Wenger, Appellant-Respondent.

In a proceeding, *inter alia,*to hold Louis Wenger in contempt of court for his willful failure to make support payments, the parties cross-appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated November 24, 1978, which, *inter alia,*granted Louis Wenger a setoff of $18,105 against arrearages. Louis Wenger has withdrawn his appeal. On the cross appeal by Ann Wenger, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The record amply supports the determination of the Family Court that petitioner consented to the manner in which Louis Wenger met his support obligations. A setoff against arrearages was therefore proper. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
#### *Fish vs. The Simmermans.*

Motion.

*jSkeriffe. Executions.*Limitations,

Case 18.

June 5.

Error to the Rockcastle circuit: Joseph Eve, Judge,

A motion aj gainst the sheriff, for failing to return an execution for one *82month cannot bo made after two years-—Shall this timo be computed up to the day of the service of the notice, or making the motion in court ?

*81Judge Owsdev

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

There is in this case one point decisive against the judgment. The proceeding was against Fish, by motion, for his failure, as late sheriff of Rockcastle, to return within a month from the return day, an execution issued in favor of the *82Simmermans &c.and which, was put into ids hands for collection. The motion was made in pursuance to a notice which was not served upon Fish until the month of March, 1824; before which time, more than two years from the return day of the execution had elapsed; and by the act of January, 1811, no motion for a failure to return an execution can be maintained, against a sheriff, after the lapse of two years from the return day, unless in particular cases excepted by the act, within none of which- exceptions is this case brought. After the time limited *by*the act, the motion ought not therefore to have been sustained against Fish. The judgment must therefore be reversed, with cost, the cause remanded to to the court below, and judgment entered in bar of the motion, &c.

Robertson, for plaintiff; *Caperton,*for defendant.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

In connection with the Form 10-K of Tri-Valley Corporation for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, I, F. Lynn Blystone, Chief Executive Officer of Tri-Valley Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. **§** 1350 as adopted pursuant to **§** 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

|   | (1) | Such Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Tri-Valley Corporation. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| Date:

 

  | May 15, 2009                                                           |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:                   | */s/F. Lynn Blystone***                                                |
|                  | F. Lynn Blystone, Chief Executive Officer CHOB

Tri-Valley Corporation |
October 3, 2016

Mr. Randy Cox
KCSI Aerial Patrol
410 East Planz Bakersfield, CA 93307

Re: FAA

– 2015

– 1827

Dear Mr. Cox :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the September 7, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/uas ) will satisfy your request. We have determined that your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption.

We have found that your petit ion, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possi ble. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/ Dan Ngo Program Analyst
9.104-4 Subcontractor responsibility. ( a ) Generally, prospective prime contractors are responsible for determining the responsibility of their prospective subcontractors (but see 9.405 and 9.405-2 regarding debarred, ineligible, or suspended firms). Determinations of prospective subcontractor responsibility may affect the Government's determination of the prospective prime contractor's responsibility. A prospective contractor may be required to provide written evidence of a proposed subcontractor's responsibility.
( b ) When it is in the Government's interest to do so, the contracting officer may directly determine a prospective subcontractor's responsibility (e.g., when the prospective contract involves medical supplies, urgent requirements, or substantial subcontracting). In this case, the same standards used to determine a prime contractor's responsibility shall be used by the Government to determine subcontractor responsibility.
[48 FR 42142, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 58638, Aug. 25, 2016; 81 FR 91638, Dec. 16, 2016; 82 FR 51529, Nov. 6, 2017]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richie Rivera, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 565]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William I. Mogulescu, J.), rendered October 15, 2001, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

*358In view of our affirmance of defendant’s New York County conviction, there is no basis for reversing the instant conviction. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.
570.802 GSA forms. ( a ) The contracting officer may use GSA Form 3626, U.S. Government Lease for Real Property (Short Form), to award leases if using the simplified leasing procedures in Subpart 570.2 or if the contracting officer determines it advantageous to use the form.
( b ) The contracting officer may use GSA Form 1364, Proposal To Lease Space to obtain offers from prospective offerors.
( c ) The contracting officer may use GSA Form 1217, Lessor's Annual Cost Statement, to obtain pricing information regarding offered services and lease commissions.
[76 FR 30854, May 27, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 50958, Aug. 19, 2020]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10356 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10356

To provide a per diem allowance for newly hired members of the Foreign 
                    Service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2024

 Mr. Castro of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide a per diem allowance for newly hired members of the Foreign 
                    Service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foreign Service Orientation Support 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PER DIEM ALLOWANCE FOR NEWLY HIRED MEMBERS OF THE FOREIGN 
              SERVICE.

    (a) Per Diem Allowance.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), any 
        newly hired Foreign Service employee who is in initial 
        orientation training, or any other training expected to last 
        less than 6 months in the Washington, DC, area before 
        transferring to the employee's first assignment overseas or 
        domestically outside the Washington, DC, area shall, for the 
        duration of such training, receive a per diem allowance at the 
        levels prescribed under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, 
        United States Code.
            (2) Limitation on lodging expenses.--A newly hired Foreign 
        Service employee may not receive any lodging expenses under the 
        applicable per diem allowance pursuant to paragraph (1) if that 
        employee--
                    (A) has a permanent residence in the Washington, 
                DC, area (not including government-supplied housing 
                during such orientation training or other training); 
                and
                    (B) does not vacate such residence during such 
                orientation training or other training.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``per diem allowance'' has the meaning given 
        such term in section 5701 of title 5, United States Code; and
            (2) the term ``Washington, DC, area'' means the geographic 
        area within a 50-mile radius of the Washington Monument.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit  99.4
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Glen Manor Resources Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for  the  year ended October 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Albert Folsom, Chief Financial
Officer,  Secretary  and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge  and  belief:

         (1)   the  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

         (2)   the  information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
               operations of the Company.



                                    /s/  "Albert  Folsom"
                                   ---------------------
                                         Albert Folsom
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     Secretary and Director
Date: March 3, 2004