CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM – Page 1 (Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: SJVUAPCD

Rule No(s): 4621 and 4622 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended December 19, 2013

Rule Title(s): Gasoline Transfer Into Stationary Stor age Containers, Delivery Vessels, and Bulk Plants (4621) and Gasoline Transfer Into Motor Vehicle Fuel Tanks (4622)

Date Submitted to ARB: January 14, 2013

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Both rules were last amended on December 7, 2007

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Sajjad Ahmad Phone Number: (559) 230-6100 E-mail Address: sajjad.ahmad@valleyair.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

Amendments to Rule 4621 remove ARB certification requi rements for aviation gasoline bulk loading operations, as ARB does not certify such operations. The am endments to Rule 4622 incorporate an exemption from requiring Phase II vapor recovery system for E85 f uel dispensing operations. Rule 4622 amendments also include incorporating requirements for alarm responses for In-Station Diagnostic (ISD) systems and for the installation of liquid condensate traps in accordance wi th ARB's executive orders. In addition, Rule 4622 amendments include reducing the frequency of the Dynamic Ba ck-Pressure Test from once every twelve months to once every five years. There are also several adm inistrative amendments to clarify rules applicability and to remove outdated and redundant language.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2 (CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Em issions: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) : N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 2 (Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP fo r the Control Measure: not specified

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed):

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: N/A

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: N/ A Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 5.0 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achi eving Emission Reductions are: N/A

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 5.0 Wo rk Practice Standards in Section(s): 6.0 Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 6.0 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 6.05/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM - Page 3 (Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: This rule amendment project has no impact on the air quality attainment plans for the San Joaquin Valley as
the District made no plan commitments to amend these rules and the amendment s do not increase emissions from

affected sources.