Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 36 / Thursday, February 25, 2021 / Notices 11551 

Dated: February 16, 2021. 

Frederick D. Vorck, Jr., 

Project Clearance Liaison, NIH Clinical 

Center, National Institutes of Health. 

[FR Doc. 2021–03869 Filed 2–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

[FWS–R4–ES–2020–N162; 

FVHC98220410150–XXX–FF04H00000] 

Florida Trustee Implementation Group 

Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Draft 

Restoration Plan 2 and Environmental 

Assessment: Habitat Projects on 

Federally Managed Lands, Sea Turtles, 

Marine Mammals, Birds, and Provide 

and Enhance Recreational 

Opportunities 

AGENCY: Department of the Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability; request 

for public comments. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Oil 

Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA); the 

National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969 (NEPA); the Final Programmatic 

Damage Assessment Restoration Plan 

and Final Programmatic Environmental 

Impact Statement (Final PDARP/PEIS) 

and Record of Decision; and the Consent 

Decree, the Federal and State natural 

resource trustee agencies for the Florida 

Trustee Implementation Group (FL TIG) 

have prepared the Florida Trustee 

Implementation Group Draft Restoration 

Plan 2 and Environmental Assessment: 

Habitat Projects on Federally Managed 

Lands; Sea Turtles; Marine Mammals; 

Birds; and Provide and Enhance 

Recreational Opportunities (Draft RP/ 

EA). In the Draft RP/EA, the FL TIG 

proposes projects to help restore injured 

habitats, sea turtles, marine mammals, 

birds, and to compensate for lost 

recreational use in the Florida 

Restoration Area as a result of the 

Deepwater Horizon (DWH) oil spill. The 

approximate cost to implement the FL 

TIG’s proposed action (19 preferred 

alternatives) is $62,200,000. We invite 

public comments on the Draft RP/EA. 

DATES: We will consider public 

comments on the Draft RP/EA received 

on or before Monday, March 29, 2021. 

The FL TIG will host a public webinar 

on March 11, 2021 at 5 p.m. ET. The 

public webinar will include a 

presentation of the Draft RP/EA. The 

public may register for the webinar at 

https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/ 

register/4537956480105991181. After 

registering, participants will receive a 

confirmation email with instructions for 

joining the webinar. Instructions for 

commenting will be provided during the 

webinar. Shortly after the webinar is 

concluded, the presentation material 

will be posted on the web at https://

www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/ 

restoration-areas/florida. 

ADDRESSES: 

Obtaining Documents: You may 

download the Draft RP/EA from either 

of the following websites: 

• https://www.doi.gov/ 

deepwaterhorizon 

• https://

www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/ 

restoration-areas/florida 

Alternatively, you may request a CD of 

the Draft RP/EA (see FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT). 

Submitting Comments: You may 

submit comments by one of the 

following methods: 

• Via the Web: http://

www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov/ 

restoration-areas/florida. 

• Via U.S. Mail: U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 29649, 

Atlanta, GA 30345. To be considered, 

mailed comments must be postmarked 

on or before the comment deadline 

given in DATES. 

• During the public webinar: Written 

comments may be provided by the 

public during the webinar. Webinar 

information is provided in DATES. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nanciann Regalado at nanciann_

regalado@fws.gov or 678–296–6805, or 

via the Federal Relay Service at 800– 

877–8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Introduction 

On April 20, 2010, the mobile 

offshore drilling unit Deepwater 

Horizon, which was being used to drill 

a well for BP Exploration and 

Production, Inc. (BP), in the Macondo 

prospect (Mississippi Canyon 252– 

MC252), experienced a significant 

explosion, fire, and subsequent sinking 

in the Gulf of Mexico, resulting in an 

unprecedented volume of oil and other 

discharges from the rig and from the 

wellhead on the seabed. The DWH oil 

spill is the largest offshore oil spill in 

U.S. history, discharging millions of 

barrels of oil over a period of 87 days. 

In addition, well over 1 million gallons 

of dispersants were applied to the 

waters of the spill area in an attempt to 

disperse the spilled oil. An 

undetermined amount of natural gas 

was also released into the environment 

as a result of the spill. 

The Trustees conducted the natural 

resource damage assessment (NRDA) for 

the DWH oil spill under the Oil 

Pollution Act 1990 (OPA; 33 U.S.C. 

2701 et seq.). Pursuant to OPA, Federal 

and State agencies act as trustees on 

behalf of the public to assess natural 

resource injuries and losses and to 

determine the actions required to 

compensate the public for those injuries 

and losses. The OPA further instructs 

the designated trustees to develop and 

implement a plan for the restoration, 

rehabilitation, replacement, or 

acquisition of the equivalent of the 

injured natural resources under their 

trusteeship to baseline (the resource 

quality and conditions that would exist 

if the spill had not occurred). This 

includes the loss of use and services 

provided by those resources from the 

time of injury until the completion of 

restoration. 

The DWH Trustees are: 

• U.S. Department of the Interior 

(DOI), as represented by the National 

Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service, and Bureau of Land 

Management; 

• National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration (NOAA), on behalf of 

the 

U.S. Department of Commerce; 

• U.S. Department of Agriculture 

(USDA); 

• U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA); 

• State of Louisiana Coastal 

Protection and Restoration Authority, 

Oil Spill Coordinator’s Office, 

Department of Environmental Quality, 

Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, 

and Department of Natural Resources; 

• State of Mississippi Department of 

Environmental Quality; 

• State of Alabama Department of 

Conservation and Natural Resources and 

Geological Survey of Alabama; 

• State of Florida Department of 

Environmental Protection and Fish and 

Wildlife Conservation Commission; and 

• State of Texas: Texas Parks and 

Wildlife Department, Texas General 

Land Office, and Texas Commission on 

Environmental Quality. 

On April 4, 2016, the United States 

District Court for the Eastern District of 

Louisiana entered a Consent Decree 

resolving civil claims by the Trustees 

against BP arising from the DWH oil 

spill: United States v. BPXP et al., Civ. 

No. 10–4536, centralized in MDL 2179, 

In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig 

‘‘Deepwater Horizon’’ in the Gulf of 

Mexico, on April 20, 2010 (E.D. La.) 

(http://www.justice.gov/enrd/deepwaterhorizon). Pursuant to the Consent 

Decree, restoration projects in the 

Florida Restoration Area are chosen and 

managed by the FL TIG. The FL TIG is 

composed of the following Trustees: 

State of Florida Department of 

Environmental Protection and Fish and 

11552 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 36 / Thursday, February 25, 2021 / Notices 

Wildlife Conservation Commission; 

DOI; NOAA; EPA; and USDA. 

Background 

On August 20, 2019, the FL TIG 

posted a public notice at http://

www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov 

requesting new or revised natural 

resource restoration project ideas by 

September 20, 2019, for the Florida 

Restoration Area. The notice stated that 

the FL TIG was seeking project ideas for 

the following restoration types: (1) 

Habitat Projects on Federally Managed 

Lands; (2) Sea Turtles; (3) Marine 

Mammals; (4) Birds; (5) Provide and 

Enhance Recreational Opportunities; 

and (6) Oysters. On July 29, 2020, the FL 

TIG announced that it had initiated 

drafting of the RP/EA and that it would 

include a reasonable range of restoration 

alternatives (projects) for five restoration 

types. The FL TIG decided not to 

include Oysters Restoration Type 

projects in the DRAFT RP/EA (see RP/ 

EA for further details). 

Overview of the FL TIG Draft RP/EA 

The Draft RP/EA provides the FL 

TIG’s analysis of the reasonable range of 

alternatives. The FL TIG’s 19 preferred 

alternatives are presented in the 

following table under the restoration 

type from which funds would be 

allocated in accordance with the DWH 

Consent Decree. The FL TIG also 

evaluated five non-preferred alternatives 

in addition to the No Action alternative. 

Restoration Type: Habitat Projects on Federally Managed Lands: 

Johnson Beach Access Management and Habitat Protection. 

Perdido Key Sediment Placement. 

Pensacola Beach Fort Pickens Road Wildlife Lighting Retrofits. 

Restoration Type: Sea Turtles: 

Increased Observers and Outreach to Reduce Incidental Hooking of Sea Turtles in Recreational Fisheries along Florida’s Gulf Coast. 

Reducing Threats to Sea Turtles through Removal of In-water Marine Debris along Florida’s Gulf Coast. 

Assessing Risk and Conducting Public Outreach to Reduce Vessel Strikes on Sea Turtles along Florida’s Gulf Coast. 

Restoration Type: Marine Mammals: 

Florida Gulf Coast Marine Mammal Stranding Network. 

Restoration Type: Birds: 

Gomez Key Oyster Reef Expansion and Breakwaters for American Oystercatchers. 

Egmont Key Vegetation Management and Dune Retention. 

Northeast Florida Coastal Predation Management. 

Florida Shorebird and Seabird Stewardship and Habitat Management—5 Years. 

Restoration Type: Provide and Enhance Recreational Opportunities: 

Pensacola Community Maritime Park Public Fishing Marina. 

Baars Park and Sanders Beach Kayak Fishing Trail Access Upgrades. 

Engineering and Design for Pensacola Beach Park West Fishing Pier and Access Improvements. 

Gulf Breeze Parks Boating and Fishing Access Upgrades. 

Lincoln Park Boat Ramp and Dock Improvements. 

Florida Artificial Reef Creation and Restoration—Phase 2. 

Apollo Beach Recreational Sportfish Hatchery Facility. 

Restoration Types: Habitat Projects on Federally Managed Lands and Provide and Enhance Recreational Opportunities: 

St. Vincent National Wildlife Refuge Access and Recreational Improvements through Acquisition at Indian Pass. 

Next Steps 

As described above in DATES, the 

Trustees will host a public webinar to 

facilitate the public review and 

comment process. After the public 

comment period ends, the Trustees will 

consider and address the comments 

received before issuing a final RP/EA. 

Public comments and Trustee responses 

will be included in the final RP/EA. 

Public Availability of Comments 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Administrative Record 

The documents comprising the 

Administrative Record for DRAFT RP/ 

EA can be viewed electronically at 

https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon/ 

adminrecord. 

Authority 

The authority for this action is the Oil 

Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2701 et 

seq.), its implementing NRDA 

regulations found at 15 CFR part 990, 

and the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and 

its implementing regulations found at 

40 CFR 1500–1508. 

Mary Josie Blanchard, 

Department of the Interior, Director of Gulf 

of Mexico Restoration. 

[FR Doc. 2021–03908 Filed 2–24–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1251] 

Certain Cellular Signal Boosters, 

Repeaters, Bi-Directional Amplifiers, 

and Components Thereof (III) 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

January 21, 2021, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Wilson Electronics LLC of St. 

George, Utah. Supplements were filed 

on February 1, 8, and 11, 2021. The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain cellular signal boosters, 

repeaters, bi-directional amplifiers, and 

components thereof by reason of