alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10348 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10348

   To establish an exemption from a limitation on the use of certain 
  airport funds for safety projects at a nonhub airport or small hub 
                    airport, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2024

 Mr. Panetta introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To establish an exemption from a limitation on the use of certain 
  airport funds for safety projects at a nonhub airport or small hub 
                    airport, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS.

    Section 47119 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) Exception for Compliance Projects.--Notwithstanding 
subsection (f), the Secretary may distribute not more than $50,000,000 
per fiscal year from the discretionary fund established under section 
47115 for terminal development projects that are a necessary component 
of a program to bring a nonhub airport, or a small hub airport that is 
eligible to receive discretionary funds under section 47108(e)(3), into 
compliance with airport safety design standards.''.
                                 <all>
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: HIV Among Youth      

# Resource: HIV Among Youth

This updated fact sheet contains the latest data on the diagnosis of HIV and AIDS among youth, living with AIDS, deaths from AIDS, prevention challenges, and the multifaceted approach CDC is using to meet the goals of the *National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States: Updated to 2020* (PDF, 74 pages). 

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/age/youth/index.html?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
#### Ronald Fischer et al., Plaintiffs, v Waldbaum’s, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Tomco Mechanical Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 904]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Loughlin, J.), dated March 25, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Workers’ Compensation Law § 11 bars a third-party action for contribution or indemnification against an employer when its employee is injured in a work-related accident unless the employee has sustained a “grave injury” or the claim for contribution or indemnification is “based upon a provision in a written contract entered into prior to the accident or occurrence by which the employer had expressly agreed to contribution to or indemnification of the claimant or person asserting the cause of action for the type of loss suffered” (Workers’ Compensation Law § 11; *see Majewski v Broadalbin-Perth Cent. School Dist.,*91 NY2d 577, 585 [1998]; *Guijarro v V.R.H. Constr. Corp.,*290 AD2d 485, 486 [2002]; *Potter v M.A. Bongiovanni, Inc.,*271 AD2d 918, 919 [2000]).

The injured plaintiff Ronald Fischer (hereinafter the plaintiff) did not sustain a “grave injury” within the meaning of the statute (Workers’ Compensation Law § 11). However, in response to the appellant’s prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]), the respondents raised a triable issue of fact as to *757whether there was a written contract for indemnification in effect on the date of the plaintiffs accident. Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7921

TARIF ABDULLAH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL STOUFFER, Warden; STATE OF MARYLAND

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District

Judge. (CA-05-1050-WMN-1)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 30, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tarif Abdullah, Appellant Pro Se. Michael O’Connor Doyle,

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tarif Abdullah, a Maryland inmate, seeks to appeal the

district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition, which the district court construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition, and denying reconsideration. The orders are not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of the

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Abdullah has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Abdullah’s motions for

appointment of counsel and for oral argument, deny a certificate of

appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WAH YUET (USA), INC.,

 Plaintiff,

 and

YONG LI CHEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General;

TOM RIDGE, Secretary of the United

States Department of Homeland Security;

DONALD NEUFELD, Director of the

United States Citizenship and Immigration

Services; US CITIZENSHIP AND

IMMIGRATION SERVICES,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 06-55709

D.C. No. CV-04-09145-CAS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding

FILED

MAR 08 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

2

Submitted March 3, 2010** 

Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, IKUTA and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Because the Immigration and Naturalization Service (now U.S. Citizenship

and Immigration Services (“USCIS”)) received a report from an agent of the antifraud unit of the Consulate General indicating that Wah Yuet no longer maintained

a qualifying relationship with its former parent company, see 8 U.S.C.

§ 1153(b)(1)(C), 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(j)(2), substantial evidence supports USCIS’s

determination that there was “good and sufficient cause” to revoke Wah Yuet’s I140, 8 U.S.C. § 1155. No record evidence compels the conclusion, contrary to that

of USCIS, that such a qualifying relationship continued to exist “at the time the

[revocation] decision was issued.” Herrera v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration

Servs., 571 F.3d 881, 886 (9th Cir. 2009). Indeed, no record evidence indicates

any continuing relationship between Wah Yuet and its one-time parent corporation

after 1997. 

Furthermore, the Administrative Appeals Office (“AAO”) did not abuse its

discretion in dismissing Chen’s appeal. Substantial evidence supports the AAO’s
3

conclusion that USCIS sent a Notice of Intent to Revoke (“NOIR”) to the proper

address on file. The record does not compel the conclusion that written

notification of Wah Yuet’s change of address was filed with the INS prior to the

date of the NOIR. See 8 C.F.R. § 205.2.

Because in the wake of the revocation of the I-140 Chen could not

demonstrate that he was “eligible to receive an immigrant visa” as required by 8

U.S.C. § 1255(a), USCIS did not abuse its discretion in denying Chen’s I-485

application for adjustment of status. The Portability Provision, 8 U.S.C. § 1154(j),

is inapplicable to this case. See Herrera, 571 F.3d at 889.

AFFIRMED.
<Page>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                        CIT GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                ($ IN MILLIONS)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                        FOR THE QUARTER ENDED   FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
                                                          DECEMBER 31, 2001       DECEMBER 31, 2000
                                                        ---------------------   ---------------------
                                                             (SUCCESSOR)            (PREDECESSOR)
<S>                                                     <C>                     <C>
Net income............................................          $239.1                  $160.1
Provision for income taxes............................           146.6                    97.4
                                                                ------                  ------
Earnings before provision for income taxes............           385.7                   257.5
                                                                ------                  ------
Fixed charges:
  Interest and debt expense on indebtedness...........           349.1                   652.2
  Minority interest in subsidiary trust holding solely
    debentures of the Company.........................             3.7                     4.8
  Interest factor-one third of rentals on real and
    personal properties...............................             4.0                     4.4
                                                                ------                  ------
Total fixed charges...................................           356.8                   661.4
                                                                ------                  ------
Total earnings before provision for income taxes and
  fixed charges.......................................          $742.5                  $918.9
                                                                ======                  ======
Ratios of earnings to fixed charges...................            2.08x                   1.39x
</Table>
#### 904.7000 Scope of subpart.

This subpart sets forth the Department of Energy policies and procedures regarding Facility Clearances for contractors and subcontractors that require access to classified information or special nuclear material. A Facility Clearance is based upon a determination that satisfactory safeguards and security measures are carried out for classified activities being performed at the facility and upon a favorable foreign ownership, control, or influence (FOCI) determination.

[67 FR 14876, Mar. 28, 2002]
#### 970.1504-1-10 Special considerations: Fee limitations.

In situations where the objective performance incentives are of unusual difficulty or where the successful completion of the performance incentives would provide extraordinary value to the Government, fees in excess of those allowed under 970.1504-1-5 and 970.1504-1-9 may be allowed with the approval of the Senior Procurement Executive, or designee. Requests to allow fees in excess of those provided under other provisions of this fee policy must be accompanied by a written justification with detailed supporting rationale as to how the specific circumstances satisfy the two criteria listed in this subsection.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36372, 36378, July 22, 2009]
#### 8.406-7 Contractor Performance Evaluation.

Ordering activities must prepare at least annually and at the time the work under the order is completed, an evaluation of contractor performance for each order that exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold in accordance with 42.1502(c).

[78 FR 46787, Aug. 1, 2013]
#### 752.7007 Personnel compensation.

The following clause shall be used in all USAID cost-reimbursement contracts.

# Personnel Compensation (JUL 2007)

(a) Direct compensation of the Contractor's personnel will be in accordance with the Contractor's established policies, procedures, and practices, and the cost principles applicable to this contract.

(b) Reimbursement of the employee's base annual salary plus overseas recruitment incentive, if any, which exceed the USAID Contractor Salary Threshold (USAID CST) stated in USAID Automated Directives System (ADS) Chapter 302 USAID Direct Contracting, must be approved in writing by the contracting officer, as prescribed in 731.205-6(b) or 731.371(b), as applicable.

(End of clause)

[49 FR 13259, Apr. 3, 1984, as amended at 49 FR 33669, Aug. 24, 1984; 61 FR 39095, July 26, 1996; 62 FR 40470, July 29, 1997; 72 FR 19669, Apr. 19, 2007; 79 FR 74988, Dec. 16, 2014; 89 FR 4209, Jan. 23, 2024]
#### In the Matter of Leon R. Edelstein, Petitioner, v. Department of State of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed and the petition dismissed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. The finding of respondents that petitioner, a .real estate broker, acted in pursuance of his own undisclosed interests while also undertaking to act for a client is supported by substantial evidence. The suspension of his license for 60 days is reasonable. The further condition that suspension continue until the petitioner shall have reimbursed the fee collected by him in this transaction, seems, in the special circumstances of this case, also to be reasonable. Although no specific power to require, as a condition of ending a suspension, the repayment of a fee is to be found in the words of the statute (Real Property Law, § 441-c), the Department of State has by necessary implication the incidental power to impose reasonable conditions upon the reinstatement of a suspended license. Conditions which might have no bearing on the broker’s activities within the area of the department’s official supervision and control could not he imposed. But such a condition as this, that the broker repay the fee taken by him on the very transaction for which he has been disciplined, lies well within the area of control of licensees by the department and seems a reasonable incident to the power to suspend the license. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Bergan, JJ.
#### MALONE, Respondent, v. YONKERS R. ., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Di-ion, Second Department.

March 2, 1906.)

Action by Ellen Malone against the Yonkers Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
Exhibit 99.6


                      Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350
                  of Chapter 63 of Title 18 United States Code
                  --------------------------------------------


         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Exelon Generation Company, LLC for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2002, that (i) the report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Exelon Generation Company,
LLC and its subsidiaries.



Date:  August 5, 2002             /s/ Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.
                                  ---------------------------
                                  Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.
                                  CEO and President (Chief Executive Officer)
                                  Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Exhibit  32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Glen Manor Resources Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended October 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerrold Burden, Chief Executive
Officer, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                                 /s/ "Jerrold  Burden"
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Jerrold Burden
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 President and Director

Date: February 7, 2006
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Juvenile Court Statistics      

# Report: Juvenile Court Statistics

This report draws on data from the National Juvenile Court Data Archive to describe delinquency cases handled between 1985 and 2013 and petitioned status offense cases handled between 1995 and 2013 by United States courts with juvenile jurisdiction. 

http://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/publications/StatBBAbstract.asp?BibID=271305&utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           2011 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results      

# 2011 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Division of Adolescent and School Health published 2011 national, state, and local Youth Risk Behavior Survey results. These results show significant improvements in many health behaviors during the past two decades, as well as new possible risks resulting from an increased use of technology.

http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs/index.htm