alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 14.1**

** **

```
! 
```

**VillageEDOCS**

**SENIOR FINANCIALOFFICERS**

**CODE OF ETHICS**

 

GENERAL PHILOSOPHY

 

The Chief Executive Officer andthe Chief Financial Officer (collectively "Senior FinancialOfficers") are responsible for the integrity of VillageEDOCS' financial reportingand system of internal accounting and controls. The honesty, integrity andsound judgment of each Senior Financial Officer is fundamental to thereputation and success of VillageEDOCS.  

 

While all employees, officers,and directors are required to adhere to the VillageEDOCS' Code of Ethics, the professional and ethical conduct of Senior FinancialOfficers is essential to the proper function and success of VillageEDOCS as apublic company.

 

SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS CODE OF ETHICS

 

To the best of his knowledge andability, each Senior Financial Officer of VillageEDOCS must:

 

                (i)            Actwith honesty and integrity, avoid actual or apparent conflicts of interest inpersonal and professional relationships.

 

                (ii)           Providecolleagues with information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant,timely and understandable.

 

                (iii)          Complywith applicable laws, rules and regulations of federal, state, and localgovernments (both United States and foreign) and other appropriate                                private andpublic regulatory agencies.

 

                (iv)          Actin good faith, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresentingmaterial facts or allowing independent judgment to be subordinated.

 

                (v)           Respectthe confidentiality of information acquired in the course of employment.

 

                (vi)          Shareknowledge and maintain skills necessary and relevant to VillageEDOCS' needs.

 

                (vii)         Proactivelypromote ethical and honest behavior within the VillageEDOCS environment.

 

                (viii)        Assureresponsible use of and control of all assets, resources and information ofVillageEDOCS.

 

                Each SeniorFinancial Officer is expected to adhere to the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers at all times. The board ofdirectors shall have the sole and absolute authority to approve any deviationor waiver from the Code of Ethics for Senior FinancialOfficers. Any waiver and the grounds for such waiver for a Senior FinancialOfficer shall be promptly disclosed through a filing with the Securities andExchange Commission on Form 8-K. Additionally, any change of this Code ofEthics for Senior Financial Officers shall be promptlydisclosed to shareholders.

 

                

** **
#### Eli S. Rivera, Respondent-Appellant, v City of New York et al., Defendants, Weirfield Coal Co., Inc., Appellant-Respondent, and Poma Realty Co., Inc., Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 867]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Weirfield Coal Co., Inc., appeals from (1) stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated May 23, 2002, which, inter alia, denied that branch of its cross motion which was to renew a prior motion to vacate a default judgment, and (2) a judgment of the same court dated July 9, 2002, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against *775it in the principal sum of $32,760, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from stated portions of the order and judgment. Application by the plaintiff to withdraw the cross appeals.

Ordered that the application is granted and the cross appeals are dismissed as withdrawn, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The Supreme Court properly denied the motion of the defendant Weirfield Coal Co., Inc. (hereinafter the defendant), to renew a prior motion to vacate a default judgment entered against it many years earlier.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Share with Youth: Educational Pathways for Youth Transitioning from Juvenile Justice Facilities      

# Share with Youth: Educational Pathways for Youth Transitioning from Juvenile Justice Facilities

This packet (PDF, 12 pages) provides checklists, guidance, resources, and templates of commonly required documents to help justice-impacted youth prepare for their future after leaving a facility. 

http://www2.ed.gov/students/prep/juvenile-justice-transition/pathways-transitioning-justice-facilities.pdf?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Share-with-Youth&utm_medium=federal-links
Exhibit 13






906 Certification




The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the Exchange Act and does not constitute a part of the Report accompanying this letter.




Jason C.S. Chang, the Chief Executive Officer, and Joseph Tung, the Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:




1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and




2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc..









Date: April 20, 2012




By:
/s/ Jason C.S. ChangName:
Jason C.S. ChangTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerBy:
/s/ Joseph TungName:
Joseph TungTitle:
Chief Financial Officer
642.703-2 Certificate of indirect costs. ( b ) The head of the contracting activity is the agency head's designee for the purpose of FAR 42.703-2(b).
[64 FR 43629, Aug. 11, 1999]
#### 619.705 Responsibilities of the contracting officer under the subcontracting assistance program.
#### 52.246-11 Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement.

As prescribed in 46.311, insert the following clause:

# Higher-Level Contract Quality Requirement (DEC 2014)

(a) The Contractor shall comply with the higher-level quality standard(s) listed below.

[*Contracting Officer insert the title, number, date, and tailoring (if any) of the higher-level quality standards.*]

(b) The Contractor shall include applicable requirements of the higher-level quality standard(s) listed in paragraph (a) of this clause and the requirement to flow down such standards, as applicable, to lower-tier subcontracts, in—

(1) Any subcontract for critical and complex items (see 46.203(b) and (c)); or

(2) When the technical requirements of a subcontract require—

(i) Control of such things as design, work operations, in-process control, testing, and inspection; or

(ii) Attention to such factors as organization, planning, work instructions, documentation control, and advanced metrology.

(End of clause)

[79 FR 70348, Nov. 25, 2014]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: FY 2017 Budget Request for the Department of Education      

# Resource: FY 2017 Budget Request for the Department of Education

The fiscal year 2017 budget request for ED builds on continued efforts to invest in education and improve outcomes for all students. The budget request focuses on:
                  - increasing  equity  and  excellence  in education, from preschool through college,
                  - providing  support for teachers and school leaders ,
                  - promoting  access, affordability, and completion  in higher education, and
                  - increasing  socioeconomic diversity  in schools.

http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/index.html?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2015

No. 04-15-00326-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.D.,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-01927

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is 

extended to August 4, 2015.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
International Surfacing, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004, I, Samuel
Serritella, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of International
Surfacing, Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period
ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of International Surfacing, Inc.

Dated: April 14, 2005

                                            INTERNATIONAL SURFACING, INC.

                                            By: /s/ Samuel Serritella
                                                    -----------------
                                                    Samuel Serritella,
                                                    CEO and CFO
#### Pearl Coffee et al., Appellants, v. Board of Trustees of the Village of Kings Point et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, to review and to declare void a determination of the respondent Board of Trustees of the Village of Kings Point, amending a special permit theretofore issued to the respondent Fleetwood Pool Association, Inc., a membership corporation, so as to permit it to operate tennis courts on its premises in addition to a swimming pool, the petitioners appeal: (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Count, Nassau County, entered October 7, 1964 upon the court’s decision, dated August 20, 1964, which granted respondents’ motions to dismiss the petition on the ground that the proceeding was untimely brought’, and (2) from an order of said count made September 25, 1964 upon reargument, which adhered to the court’s original decision of August 20, 1964. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. Special Term correctly ruled that the 30-day limitation period, prescribed in section 179-ib of the Village Law for the review of the amendment to the special permit, began on January 15, 1964, the date when the decision to grant the amendment was filed in the office of the Village Clerk, and not on June 19,1964, the date when the decision that there had been compliance with the conditions on which the amendment had been granted, was filed in the office of the Village Clerk. (For prior appeal, see 21 A D 2d 693.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.
#### SOMBORN, Appellant, v. SOMBORN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 2, 1906.)

Action by Sarah A. Somborn against Henry G. Somborn and Aaron H. Rosenberg, individually and as executors, etc., of Moses Somborn, deceased.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with -costs.
EX-10.44



 Exhibit 10.44 

Destination Maternity Corporation 

232 Strawbridge Drive 
 Moorestown,
NJ 08057 
 April 6, 2017 

Via Hand Delivery 
 Mr. Anthony M. Romano 

Re: 2016 Annual Bonus 
 Dear Tony: 

This letter confirms your agreement with Destination Maternity Corporation (the “Company”) regarding the payment of your annual bonus for the
Company’s fiscal year ended January 28, 2017 (your “2016 Bonus”). 
 In consideration for the Compensation Committee’s
agreement to refrain from the exercise of negative discretion under Section 3(e) of the Company’s 2013 Management Incentive Plan (the “Bonus Plan”) with respect to your 2016 Bonus, you have agreed that: (i) your 2016 Bonus
amount is $201,885, (ii) the bonus payment timing rules of Section 4 of the Bonus Plan will not apply to your 2016 Bonus, and (iii) your 2016 Bonus will be paid, if at all, in the same manner, at the same time and subject to the same
requirements and conditions as the transaction bonus described in Section 2 of your Transaction Bonus Agreement with the Company dated May 31, 2016, as amended on January 6, 2017 (the “Transaction Bonus Agreement”).
For avoidance of doubt and without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, this means that your 2016 Bonus will not be paid if an Approved Transaction (as defined in the Transaction Bonus Agreement) does not occur prior to January 1,
2018. 
 To acknowledge your agreement with all of the foregoing, please execute this letter in the space provided below and return the executed copy to me.

  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Ronald J. Masciantonio
	
	Ronald J. Masciantonio
	Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer


  

	
	Agreed on April 6, 2017:
	
	 /s/ Anthony M. Romano

	Anthony M. Romano
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Q&A: Meeting the Needs of Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Youth      

# Q&A: Meeting the Needs of Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming Youth

The National Clearinghouse on Families and Youth published this Q&A with Shannon Minter, legal director at the National Center for Lesbian Rights, featuring tips for working specifically with transgender and gender non-conforming youth.

http://ncfy.acf.hhs.gov/the-beat/2012/01/transgender-gender-non-conforming
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,443-01

EX PARTE JERRY DALE JONES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1407048-A IN THE 178TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a

controlled substance weighing more than one gram but less than four grams, and was sentenced to

three years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and that his conviction violates due process

because less than a week after he entered his plea, the evidence in his case was tested and found to

weigh less than one gram. There were other discrepancies between the charging instrument, the plea
papers and the judgment in this case with respect to the type of controlled substance alleged to have

been possessed, and whether or not Applicant pleaded “true” to an enhancement allegation. 

On December 10, 2014, this Court remanded to the trial court to resolve the discrepancies

in the record, and to determine whether any errors in the judgment in this case were clerical errors,

subject to correction by way of judgment nunc pro tunc, or judicial errors. The parties have entered

agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the trial court has determined that Applicant’s

decision to plead guilty to possessing more than one gram but less than four grams of a controlled

substance in this case was not a voluntary and intelligent choice. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex

parte Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 1407048 in the 178th District Court of Harris

County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County to

answer the charges as set out in the information. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: March 4, 2015

Do not publish