alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
607.103 Agency-head responsibilities. The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 7.103. ( d ) Domestic requirements offices must develop a formal, written acquisition plan for all acquisitions exceeding $5 million. This includes base period plus all option years. The plan shall address the content requirements of FAR 7.105.
( j ) Acquisition plans for service contracts with an anticipated annual expenditure exceeding $25 million must be approved by the bureau Assistant Secretary.
[55 FR 5774, Feb. 16, 1990, as amended at 80 FR 6918, Feb. 9, 2015]
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 13

- 00208

- CR

JASON LEE REED , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

Appeal from the 338th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 1266357 ).

TO THE 338TH DISTRICT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 29th day of August 2014 , the ca se upon appeal to revise or

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by

the trial court on March 4, 2013. After submitting the case on

the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the

parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains

no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial

court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered August 29

, 2014.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.Opinion delivered by Justice Sharp.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order o f our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

January 2, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1028 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1028

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
  the cover over of distilled spirits taxes to the Virgin Islands and 
                              Puerto Rico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2023

   Ms. Plaskett (for herself and Mrs. Gonzalez-Colon) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the limitation on 
  the cover over of distilled spirits taxes to the Virgin Islands and 
                              Puerto Rico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON COVER OVER OF DISTILLED SPIRITS 
              TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Section 7652 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking subsection (f) and by redesignating subsections 
(g), (h), and (i) as subsections (f), (g), and (h), respectively.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 7652(f)(1) of such Code, as 
redesignated by subsection (a), is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (B), and
            (2) by striking ``as if--'' and all that follows through 
        ``the use and tax'' and inserting ``as if the use and tax''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to distilled spirits brought into the United States after 
December 31, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Claim of John D. Lapham, Appellant. Starline USA, Inc., Respondent; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 916]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 12, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidences supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant lost his employment as a driver for a warehouse due to disqualifying misconduct when he refused to work mandatory overtime. The employer testified that claimant was aware at the time he was hired that overtime, including Saturday, was a condition of *863employment. Inasmuch as claimant refused, the employer’s reasonable overtime work assignment and he was aware that it could lead to his termination, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision *(see Matter of Legault [Commissioner of Labor],*286 AD2d 795 [2001]; *Matter of Velez [Sweeney],*243 AD2d 939 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 805 [1998]; *Matter of Lander [Sweeney],*242 AD2d 821 [1997]). To the extent that claimant’s testimony differed from that presented by the employer with regard to the agreed-upon overtime, this created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve *(see Matter of Mack [Commissioner of Labor],*257 AD2d 828 [1999]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### 908.7112 Materials handling equipment replacement standards.

Materials handling equipment shall be purchased for replacement purposes in accordance with the standards in FPMR 41 CFR 101-25.405 and DOE-PMR 41 CFR 109-25.4. The Heads of Contracting Activities are authorized to replace an item earlier than the date specified in such standards under unusual circumstances. A written justification shall be placed in the purchase file.

[49 FR 11945, Mar. 28, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9105, Feb. 25, 1994]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William John McCormick, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for reargument of his appeal which was decided on June 22, 1959 (8 A D 2d 846) *(People*V. *McCormick,*8 A D 2d 846). The motion is based upon two recent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States *(Jackson*V. *Denno,*378 U. S. 368; *Escobedo*v. *State of Illinois,*378 U. S. 478). The motion for reargument is denied for the reasons stated by this court in *People*v. *Hovnanian*(22 A D 2d 686). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
9.500 Scope of subpart. This subpart: ( a ) Prescribes responsibilities, general rules, and procedures for identifying, evaluating, and resolving organizational conflicts of interest;
( b ) Provides examples to assist contracting officers in applying these rules and procedures to individual contracting situations; and
( c ) Implements section 8141 of the 1989 Department of Defense Appropriation Act, Pub. L. 100-463, 102 Stat. 2270-47 (1988).
[55 FR 42685, Oct. 22, 1990, as amended at 65 FR 36014, June 6, 2000]
#### 901.103 Authority.

The DEAR and amendments thereto are issued by the Senior Procurement Executives of the Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). The DOE Senior Procurement Executive delegation is pursuant to a delegation from the Secretary of Energy in accordance with the authority of section 644 of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7254), section 205(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended, (40 U.S.C. 121(c)(2)), and other applicable laws. The NNSA Senior Procurement Executive delegation is pursuant to a delegation from the Administrator of the NNSA, in accordance with section 3212 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2402), section 205(c) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended, (40 U.S.C. 121(c)(2)), and other applicable laws.

[76 FR 7689, Feb. 11, 2011]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Quick Guide for Clinicians Based on TIP 57: Trauma-Informed Care in Behavioral Health Services      

# Quick Guide for Clinicians Based on TIP 57: Trauma-Informed Care in Behavioral Health Services

This resource equips care providers and administrators with information on caring for people who have experienced trauma or may be at risk for developing trauma stress reactions. It addresses prevention, intervention, and treatment issues and strategies.

http://store.samhsa.gov/product/SMA15-4912?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
#### In re DOOLEY’S WILL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 23, 1906.)

In the matter of the will of Bridget Dooley, deceased.

No opinion. Decree affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
#### 927.402 Acquisition and use of technical data.
**Exhibit32.b**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCinergy Corp., The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, PSI Energy, Inc. andThe Union Light, Heat and Power Company (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Foster Duncan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompanies.

 

Date: August 4, 2004

 
| /s/ R. Foster Duncan    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| R. Foster Duncan        |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           AskArne Video Interview Series: Free from Fear      

# AskArne Video Interview Series: Free from Fear

The #AskArnie video series features Secretary Arne Duncan discussing current hot topics in education today. The first episode, titled “Free from Fear,” focuses on gun violence, school safety, and the multiple factors that influence student achievement.

http://www.ed.gov/blog/2013/01/duncan-addresses-gun-violence-in-new-ask-arne-video-series/
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

PHILANDER PHILIPPEAUX , Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 23

- 810 ( JEB) MERRICK GARLAND,
Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Philander Philippeaux, appearing pro se , is a federal prisoner held at FCI Coleman Low in Florida. See ECF No. 2 (Compl.) at 1. He alleges that he is falsely imprisoned there and asks this Court for injunctive relief to secure his release. The Court will dismiss this action pursuant to 28 U. S.C. § 1915A, which requires immediate dismissal of a prisoner’s case against governmental defendants if the court determines that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or is frivolous. Plaintiff’s Complaint arises from his jury convictions in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida for counts related to drug trafficking. See Phlilippeaux v. United
States , 2020 WL 1325408, at *1

– *3 (S.D. Fl. Jan. 7, 2020). He brings this action against the Attorney Gene ral, Merrick Garland, alleging myriad fantastical claims, including that a grand jury failed to actually issue an indictment against him, that he is falsely imprisoned, and that he was subject to malicious prosecution in the course of an alleged coverup to protect members of the U.S. Attorney’s office. See Compl. at 1

– 3. Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to release him from his allegedly false imprisonment and to acknowledge that the grand jury never issued an indictment against him. Id. at 4.2 In Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486

– 87 (1994), the Supreme Court held that when a successful challenge to a criminal conviction would necessarily imply the invalidity of the conviction or sentence, the plaintiff cannot bring a civil action for dam ages without first invalidating the conviction through a sanctioned proceeding. The D.C. Circuit clarified that Heck also applies to lawsuits, such as this, for equitable relief. Harris v. Fulwood , 611 Fed. App’x 1, 2 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (quoti ng Wilkinson v. Dotson , 544 U.S. 74, 81

– 82 (2005)). Because Plaintiff’s success on the current Complaint would raise serious questions about the validity of his convictions, his claims “are not cognizable unless and until he meets the requirements of Heck .” Id

. Consequently, this case will be dismissed by separate order.

/s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG Chief Judge Date: April 3, 2023
#### 6106.610 Motions [Rule 610].

Motions are strictly limited and should ordinarily be made orally during the initial conference under Rule 607. A later motion may be efiled. A party may make a procedural motion, such as to extend time. An applicant may move for voluntary dismissal. No party may move for a prehearing merits decision (*e.g.,* summary judgment or dismissal for failure to state a claim) or for involuntary prehearing dismissal other than on the merits except on the grounds that an arbitration request is untimely. A panel ordinarily issues one decision per arbitration.
#### PATTERSON, Appellant, v. JOHN H. VOODBURY DERMATOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appelate Division, First Department.

March 23, 906.)

Action by Benjamin Patterson against he John H. Woodbury Dermatological Instiute.

G. Bell, for appellant.

R. S. Nichols, or respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, yith $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
#### STOLLARICK, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department,

March 13, 1906.)

Action by Frank Stollaricli against the'New York Central & Hudson Rivei Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7710

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WALTER EUGENE HOFFMAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-94-132, CA-97-608-R) Submitted: August 31, 1998 Decided: September 21, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Walter Eugene Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hoffman , Nos. CR-94-132; CA-97-608-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Focused Deterrence of High-Risk Individuals: Response Guide No. 13      

# Resource: Focused Deterrence of High-Risk Individuals: Response Guide No. 13

This guide, developed by the Center for Problem-Oriented Policing, describes the concept of focused deterrence initiatives (FDI), administering and leading an FDI, and applying focused deterrence to specific crime problems. Police and police departments can use this guide to design and implement local FDIs. 

http://www.popcenter.org/responses/focused_deterrence?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resource
October 2013 Nevada and Northeastern California Greater Sage-Grouse Draft LUPA/EIS i

TABLE OF CONTENTS: APPENDICES

APPENDICES

A Required Design Features

B Forest Service Alternative D Language

C State of Nevada Alternative

D Regional Mitigation Strategy

E Greater Sage-Grouse Draft Monitoring Framework Plan

F Draft Greater Sage-Grouse Wildland Fire and Invasive Species Assessment 

G Leasable Mineral Stipulations, Waivers, Modifications and Exceptions

H Oil and Gas Reasonably Foreseeable Development Scenario

I Comparison of Alternatives Alleviation of USFWS-Identified Threats

J Forest Service Draft Management Indicator Species Report and Draft Wildlife and Sensitive Plant 

Specialists Report

K Livestock Grazing

L Areas of Critical Environmental Concern Evaluation Report

M Detailed Employment and Earnings Data

N Non-Market Valuation Methods

O Economic Impact Analysis Methodology
Table of Contents

ii Nevada and Northeastern California Greater Sage-Grouse Draft LUPA/EIS October 2013

This page intentionally left blank.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for Children      

# Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for Children

This resource offers information about the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program for children, which provides critical financial assistance to children with qualifying disabilities and limited resources. The infographic defines “disability”, describes program eligibility, and shares how to apply for SSI.

https://www.ssa.gov/thirdparty/materials/pdfs/SSI-for-Children-Infographic.pdf