alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### 852.101-70 Using part 852.

Part 852 prescribes supplemental provisions and clauses to the FAR. Provision and clause numbering are as prescribed in FAR 52.101 (e.g., supplementary construction clauses under part 836 are numbered 852.236-71, 852.236-72, etc.).

[73 FR 2717, Jan. 15, 2008. Redesignated at 86 FR 54403, Oct. 1, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<CIK>  0000018734
<NAME>  CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                              PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                3,393,379
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                  1,491
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     227,981
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                    26,981
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                           1,216,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           4,866,570
<COMMON>                                                   168,888
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                  405,000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                        872,290
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                           1,446,178
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                250,351
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                     1,521,652
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                          58,055
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                        0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                               60,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                        0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                    103
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                                80
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                           1,530,151
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                            4,866,570
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                1,026,352
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                        85,805
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 699,598
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 785,403
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                    240,949
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                         (10,773)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                             230,176
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    96,147
<NET-INCOME>                                               134,029
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                 10,183
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                              123,846
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                   115,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                   83,072
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                     330,402
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.60
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 05/05-0289]

      ( print page 10614)    
Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 05/05-0289 issued to Bayview Capital Partners II, LP, said license is hereby declared null and void.

United States Small Business Administration.

Thomas G. Morris,

Acting Associate Administrator, Director, Office of Liquidation Office of Investment and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 2021-03471 Filed 2-19-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### 970.5232-7 Financial management system.

As prescribed in 970.3270(b)(1), insert the following clause:

# Financial Management System (DEC 2000)

The Contractor shall maintain and administer a financial management system that is suitable to provide proper accounting in accordance with DOE requirements for assets, liabilities, collections accruing to the Contractor in connection with the work under this contract, expenditures, costs, and encumbrances; permits the preparation of accounts and accurate, reliable financial and statistical reports; and assures that accountability for the assets can be maintained. The Contractor shall submit to DOE for written approval an annual plan for new financial management systems and/or subsystems and major enhancements and/or upgrades to the currently existing financial systems and/or subsystems. The Contractor shall notify DOE thirty (30) days in advance of any planned implementation of any substantial deviation from this plan and, as requested by the Contracting Officer, shall submit any such deviation to DOE for written approval before implementation.

(End of clause)

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36376, 36378, 36380, July 22, 2009]
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tri-Valley Corporation. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   | November 17, 2011                                                           |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:               | /s/ Gregory L. Billinger                                                    |
|              | Gregory L. Billinger, Interim Chief Financial OfficerTri-Valley Corporation |
#### 970.5237-2 [Reserved]
August 16, 2016



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

VINCENT LAMON WILLIAMS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00220

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay al l costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### 811.500 Scope.

This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for using a liquidated damages clause in solicitations and contracts that involve VA sensitive personal information. This also pertains to any solicitations and contracts involving VA sensitive personal information issued by another agency for or on behalf of VA through an interagency acquisition in accordance with FAR subpart 17.5 and subpart 817.5.
#### 950.7009 Fees.

No fee will be charged a DOE contractor for a statutory nuclear hazards indemnity agreement.

[49 FR 12039, Mar. 28, 1984, as amended at 56 FR 57828, Nov. 14, 1991]
#### In the Matter of Lucy Elliot, Petitioner, v Blanche Bernstein, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the State Department of Social Services, dated April 6, 1978, which, after a statutory fair hearing, affirmed a decision of the local agency to reduce petitioner’s public assistance grant "on the grounds that appellant [petitioner] failed to provide information concerning her last child’s father’s whereabouts.” Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The determination under review was based not upon statements of third parties, but upon petitioner’s own assertions, including statements to the following effect: (1) that she saw James Heading, father of her child, about once a week for a year but never asked him where he lived, never "really” knew where he lived, never knew whether he worked and had not seen him for about one and one-half years prior to the March 2, 1978 hearing (the child was born on December 12, 1977); (2) that only by a chance meeting with a Ms. Walker — at whose house petitioner had met James Heading (and where petitioner "thought” he lived) — did petitioner learn that Heading had been married and was now dead; (3) that petitioner does not know the present address of Ms. Walker (petitioner therefore relied upon her own hearsay version of what the nontestifying Ms. Walker allegedly told her regarding Heading’s status and fate); and (4) that when, upon giving birth, petitioner stated that the father of the child was Leonard Elliot, this was an error due *729to petitioner’s just coming out of anesthesia. In our opinion the above constitutes substantial evidence supporting the State commissioner’s finding that "the record in this case establishes that the [petitioner’s] testimony relating to her failure to provide information as to the putative father’s whereabouts is not credible” (see *Matter of Stork Rest, v Boland,*282 NY 256, 267; *Matter of Donato v Wyman,*32 AD2d 1061). Damiani, J. P., Titone, O’Connor and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### 509.407 Suspension.
~:~ S1 Aerospace

A company of ST Engineering

ST Aerospace Mobile, Inc.

2100 9~ Street Brookley Complex

Mobile, AL 36615, USA

Tel: (1) 251438 8888

Fax: (1) 251 4388892

www,staero.aero

9 November, 2011

Mr. Gerald Avella

Program Manager

Atlanta - Aircraft Certification Office

cas & Certification Management Branch, ACE-102A

1701 Columbia Ave

College Park, GA 30337

USA •

Dear Gerald,

PETITION OF EXEMPTION - WITHDRAWAL

ST Aerospace Mobile, respectfully withdraws its re-petition request for exemption from 14 CFR

§25.785U), § 25.812(e), and § 25.B13(b), as it applies to Boeing 757-200 passenger airplanes

converted to cargo/passenger combination configurations, in a letter dated November 7, 2011;

and requests that the FAA continue consideration of ST Aerospace Mobile's original petition in a

letter dated July 15, 2011

Yours sincerely,

Terence Tan

Director Engineering

ST Aerospace Mobile, Inc.

Office: (251) 436-0181

Cell: (251) 379-1660

Page 1 of 1

Creating Value For You- Worldwide

The ST Engineering Group
532.904 Determining payment due dates. Payment due dates for construction contracts are addressed at FAR 32.904(d). The following procedures apply to construction and building service contracts: ( a ) The amount of final payment must include, as appropriate, deductions to cover any of the following: ( 1 ) Liquidated damages for late completion.
( 2 ) Liquidated damages for labor violations.
( 3 ) Amounts withheld for improper payment of labor wages.
( 4 ) The amount of unilateral change orders covering defects and omissions.
( 5 ) The agreed-upon dollar amount in a Deficiency Report, which is included in all applicable Operation and Maintenance (O&M) service contracts.
( b ) An official one level above the contracting officer shall approve justifications exercising the authority prescribed by FAR 32.904(d)(1)(i)(B). The time needed should be determined on a case-by-case basis, but the specified constructive acceptance period shall not exceed 30 days.
[74 FR 54917, Oct. 26, 2009, as amended at 86 FR 55520, Oct. 6, 2021]
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of YaSheng Group (the “Company”) on Form 10- K/A for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:    September 6 , 2012By:  /s/ Zhuang Hai YunZhuang Hai YunChief Financial Officer , Director and Principal Accounting Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Appellant, v Northwood Projects, Inc., Defendant, and Donald Forst et al., Respondents. (And Third-Party Actions.)

— In an action, *inter alia,*on a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 18, 1978, as denied its motion for summary judgment as to the individual defendants. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable to the respondents who *962filed one brief. There are issues of fact in this case, and thus the motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Our affirmance should not be taken as an indication that we agree with the totality of the reasons given by Special Term in its decision. Hopkins, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### McMANUS, Respondent, v. ST. REGIS PAIR CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appele Division, Fourth Department.

March 21, 06.)

Action by Charles McManus, an infant. ., against the St. Regis Paper Company.

?ER CURIAM.

Judgment and order afned, with costs, on opinion of McLennan, P. in same case on former appeal, reported f App. Div. 29, 94 N. Y. Supp. 932.

VILLIAMS and NASH, JJ.,

dissent on auirity of Foster v. International Paper Co., 1 N. Y. 45, 75 N. E. 933.
#### LEIFERT, Respondent, v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 22, 1906.)

Action by Henry Leifert against the Interborough Rapid Transit Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10558 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10558

  To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980 and the 
  Housing Act of 1949 to make financial assistance available to DACA 
                  recipients, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 20, 2024

  Mr. Vargas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980 and the 
  Housing Act of 1949 to make financial assistance available to DACA 
                  recipients, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DACA RECIPIENT ELIGIBILITY.

    Section 214(a) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980 
(42 U.S.C. 1436a) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) an alien who, on the date of the enactment of this 
        Act, is the recipient of deferred action pursuant to the 
        memorandum of the Department of Homeland Security entitled 
        `Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to 
        Individuals Who Came to the United States as Children' issued 
        on June 15, 2012.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### 9905.501-62 Exemption.

None for this Standard.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: National Juvenile Probation Office Survey      

# Report: National Juvenile Probation Office Survey

This report (PDF, 3 pages), developed by the National Child Traumatic Stress Network, details the results of a national survey of probation officers on their roles, what they know about trauma and youth, and what they want to learn about trauma and trauma-informed practices. 

http://www.nctsn.org/sites/default/files/assets/pdfs/po_survey.pdf?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Report
#### Jacob Castner, appellant, v. John Bomleny, appellee.

Gen. No. 7,585.

Trespass for assault and battery. Judgment for defendant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry county; the Hon. William T. Church, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1926.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 3, 1926.

Harry E. Brown and Arthur G. Higgs, for appellant.

Arthur H. DeRoo and Henry Waterman, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Jett

delivered the opinion of the court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the related
Form 10-Q financial statements for Pennsylvania Power Company and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.  (Amounts in
1,000's).  Income tax includes $466,000 related to other income and
$(21,208,000) related to extraordinary item.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000077278
<NAME> PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      415,507
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     32,259
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         119,122
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       387,913
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 954,801
<COMMON>                                       188,700
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        (400)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             78,900
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 267,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           15,000
<PREFERRED>                                     50,905
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           289,421
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 6,472
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 325,803
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  954,801
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      246,732
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               105
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     186,817
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     207,664
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         39,068
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,942
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  41,010
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        15,755
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,267)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,470
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  (8,737)
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        16,040
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       19,192
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          53,464
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**KARIM HUSEIN WRIGHT,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 182 MM 2014** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 23rd day of January, 2015, in response to the P etition for Leave** 

**to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tun c, this matter is**  REMANDED **to**

**the common pleas court for appointment of new counsel wi thin 30 days of this order.** 

**Newly-appointed counsel is** DIRECTED **to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within**

**60 days of appointment.**

**Justice Stevens notes his dissent and would deny the Petiti on for Leave to file a** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc.**
#### BEARDSLEE et al., Respondents, v. CHURCH, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 16, 1906.)

Action by Nathan S. Beardslee and another, as, etc., against John D. Church.

PER CTJRTAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

KRtJSE, J., not sitting.