alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12

                      THE CIT GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (Dollars in Millions)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                            For the Three Months Ended
                                                                                     March 31,
                                                                           ----------------------------
                                                                             2000                1999
                                                                           -------              ------
<S>                                                                        <C>                  <C>
Net income                                                                 $ 143.9              $ 91.9

Provision for income taxes                                                    88.3                49.2
                                                                           -------              ------

Earnings before provision for income taxes                                   232.2               141.1
                                                                           -------              ------

Fixed charges:
    Interest and debt expense on indebtedness                                571.9               273.3
    Minority interest in subsidiary trust holding solely
        debentures of the Company                                              4.8                 4.8
    Interest factor - one third of rentals on real and
        personal properties                                                    6.0                 2.3
                                                                           -------              ------

Total fixed charges                                                          582.7               280.4
                                                                           -------              ------


Total earnings before provision for income taxes
   and fixed charges                                                       $814.9               $421.5
                                                                           ======               ======

Ratios of earnings to fixed charges                                        1.40x                1.50x

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
177° 13! 12’

BULLETIN 1028 PLATE 15

Topography and grid from maps compiled by
Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, 1943

GEOLOGIC MAP OF NORTHERN KANAGA ISLAND, ALASKA

Scale 1:25,000

Contour interval 200 feet
Datum is ocean surface at
time of photography

177°03!
Be on
56) |g FFL
‘ mS yr
= gee. TN 30
Se a ec
aes ox
56/ lee,
eS
y
sy | 55
+
54’ ae;
os
Tkb
53" abege
E . -e :
Xi
}
K Ca, z
a y :
|
S|
z
iE
51° | 51°
52/| é 52/
° 700
Qat
; 4
600. Soe
: = INTERIOR—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, D. C. a
177°13' 12" 177°03!
'
4000/- ‘4000'
3000'- 3000°
2000/+ 2000
1000+ 1000’
Sea level Sea level
7
sooo ‘4000
3000/- a0be
2000’ + 2000'
1000+ 10007
Sea level sdataval

Geology by R. R. Coats, 1946

Rocks younger than caldera

Rocks formed at
time of caldera

Rocks older than caldera of Mt. Kanaton

EXPLANATION

ABLANKET OF WELL-BEDDED BASALTIC ASH COVERS
MOST OF THE AREA TO DEPTHS OF AS MUCH AS
7 FEET, BUT IS NOT SHOWN ON THE MAP

Qal

Alluvium, beach gravel, and
water-sorted pumice deposits

Historic and late prehistoric
basalt flows from Kanaga Volcano

Older volcanic rocks
‘of Kanaga Volcano
Includes basalt and andesite flows,
scoria, and tuff breccia, Qkv; vent
agglomerate and minor intrusive
rocks of later stage, Qva

UNCONFORMITY

Qat

Andesite tuff

UNCONFORMITY

Basalt flows and Olivine basalt flows
tuff breccia from from ancient vent
ancientvent near near Round Head
west coast

UNCONFORMITY
Tkb

Olivine and hypersthene basalt
and andesite flows of ancient
Mt. Kanaton

UNCONFORMITY

Basalt dome

Agglomerate in vent older
than Mt. Kanaton near
north coast

Basalt flows and tuff beds from
vent older than Mt. Kanaton
near north coast

45
a=

Strike and dip of beds

Contact, dashed where inferred

Fault, dashed where inferred

QUATERNARY

TERTIARY
#### 9904.403 Allocation of home office expenses to segments.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10396 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs furnishes certain non-opioid pain medications to veterans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 12, 2024 

Mr. LANDSMAN (for himself and Mr. VAN ORDEN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs furnishes certain nonopioid pain medications to veterans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘NOPAIN for Veterans 

5 Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 10396 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF CERTAIN NON-OPIOID PAIN MEDICA2 TIONS IN THE NATIONAL FORMULARY OF 

3 THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8125 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the 

7 following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(4) The term ‘non-opioid pain management 

9 drug or biological product’ means a drug or biologi10 cal product approved, granted, or cleared by the 

11 Food and Drug Administration to reduce post12 operative pain, or to produce postsurgical or regional 

13 analgesia, without acting upon the body’s opioid re14 ceptors.’’. 

15 (2) by redesignating subsection (d), as so 

16 amended, as subsection (e); and 

17 (3) by inserting, after subsection (c), the fol18 lowing new subsection (d): 

19 ‘‘(d) The Secretary shall— 

20 ‘‘(1) not later than one year after the date on 

21 which a non-opioid pain management drug or bio22 logical product becomes eligible for temporary addi23 tional payment under section 1833(t)(16)(G) of the 

24 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(16)(G)), or 

25 eligible for separate payment under section 416.174 

26 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or sucVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:10 Jan 14, 2025 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H10396.IH H10396

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 10396 IH

1 cessor regulation), include such non-opioid pain 

2 management drug or biological product in the na3 tional formulary of the Department; and 

4 ‘‘(2) include a non-opioid pain management 

5 drug or biological product in the drug standardiza6 tion list of the Department.’’. 

7 (b) LIMITATION.—None of the funds in the Cost of 

8 War Toxic Exposures Fund under section 324 of title 38, 

9 United States Code, may be used to carry out the amend10 ments made by this section. 

11 (c) IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than 90 days after 

12 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

13 Veterans Affairs shall implement the amendments made 

14 by this section. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### 852.207-70 [Reserved]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0070 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. ARTHUR RAY PEOPLES,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until April 12 , 202 1 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 12 2021

03/12/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0070
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2009

l1019 

# Order

October 26, 2009

139090 & (27)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139090 COA: 290348 Jackson CC: 06-004467-FC EARL LEE HOWARD, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 28, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be review ed by this Court. The motion for remand to
the trial court is DENIED.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCTOBER 27, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-14093

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00266-CR-KD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MONTREZS DEJUAN LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(October 27, 2009)

Before BLACK, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond A. Pierson, appointed counsel for Montrezs Dejuan Lewis, has
filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Lewis’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Lewis’s

motions to proceed pro se, to terminate counsel, and for an extension of time to file

a supplemental brief are DENIED AS MOOT.

2
901.601 General. ( a ) Contracting authority for DOE vests in the Secretary of Energy, and for NNSA in the Administrator. ( 1 ) The Secretary has delegated this authority to the DOE Senior Procurement Executive. The DOE Senior Procurement Executive has redelegated this authority to the DOE Heads of Contracting Activities (HCA). These delegations are formal written delegations containing specific dollar limitations and conditions. Each DOE HCA, in turn, makes formal contracting officer appointments for its contracting activity.
( 2 ) Contracting authority for NNSA vests in the Under Secretary for Nuclear Security, also known as the NNSA Administrator. The NNSA Administrator has delegated this authority, with specific dollar limitations and conditions to the NNSA Senior Procurement Executive. The NNSA Senior Procurement Executive has redelegated this authority to the NNSA Head of the Contracting Activities (HCA). Each NNSA HCA in turn makes formal contracting officer appointments for its contracting activity.
( b ) The Senior Procurement Executives have been authorized, without power of redelegation, to perform the functions set forth at 48 CFR 1.601(b) regarding the assignment of contracting functions and responsibilities to another agency, and the creation of joint or combined offices with another agency to exercise acquisition functions and responsibilities.
[76 FR 7689, Feb. 11, 2011]
#### 945.670-1 Plant clearance function.

If the plant clearance function has not been formally delegated to another Federal agency, the contracting officer shall assume all responsibilities of the plant clearance officer identified in 48 CFR 45.606-3.
#### 8.102 Policy.

When practicable, agencies shall use excess personal property as the first source of supply for agency and cost-reimbursement contractor requirements. Agency personnel shall make positive efforts to satisfy agency requirements by obtaining and using excess personal property (including that suitable for adaptation or substitution) before initiating a contract action.

[67 FR 13053, Mar. 20, 2002, as amended at 85 FR 67618, Oct. 23, 2020]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

CONCURRING OPINION

No. 04-23-00623-CR

IN RE Miguel Angel BELTRAN BARRERA et al.

Original Proceeding

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11754CR

Honorable Penny Anne Roberts, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Concurring Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 4, 2023

I respectfully concur in denying without prejudice relator’s petition for writ of mandamus 

for the reasons expressed in my concurrence in In re Santiago Villalobos, No. 04-23-00538-CR, 

2023 WL 4750833, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 26, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) 

(Martinez, C.J., concurring).

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Jagged
Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                              |  |                        
|----------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 25, 2011         
|                              | 
|By:                           |  | /s/    Paul Demirdjian 
|                              |  | Chief Executive Officer
|(Principle Executive Officer)
908.1102-70 Vehicle leasing. ( a ) ( 4 ) Commercial vehicle lease sources may be used only when the General Services Administration (GSA) has advised that it cannot furnish the vehicle(s) through the Interagency Motor Pool System and it has been determined that the vehicle(s) are not available through the GSA Consolidated Leasing Program. All subsequent lease renewals or extensions may be exercised only when GSA has advised that it cannot furnish the vehicle(s) as prescribed herein.
[77 FR 74386, Dec. 14, 2012]
#### Leonard Roof, as Administrator of the Estate of William Kehoe, Deceased, Appellant, v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al., Respondents.

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered January 26, 1977, granting defendants’ motion for a protective order striking the notice of discovery and inspection is unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and without prejudice to a motion to depose a more knowledgeable employee or to service of a more precise notice of discovery and inspection. In this action to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering arising from an accident which occurred when plaintiff’s intestate was struck by one of defendants’ trains on the tracks of one of defendants’ stations in Jersey City, New Jersey, plaintiff sought discovery and inspection. Plaintiff’s motion called for *all*maps, plans, blueprints, surveys, photographs or other documents depicting the construction format, layout, diagrams, etc., for such items as tracks, stairs, platforms and lighting fixtures. The court at Special Term, in striking this overbroad demand, encompassing as it does the entire railroad station, opined that the pending examination of the motorman, along with the previous examination of the train conductor, should be sufficient to satisfy the plaintiff. Plaintiff argues that the depositions were not informative inasmuch as he sought specific information pertaining to grade, contour, description, distances and other physical characteristics of the tracks and tunnel approaching the station. Although we agree that the facts plaintiff seeks to discover are germane to the action, the striking of his notice was proper due to its "blunderbuss” effect. (See *City of New York v Friedberg & Assoc.,*62 AD2d 407). *Rios v Donovan*(21 AD2d 409, 413) held that documents be identified with reasonable particularity in the notice. Proper procedure requires that a party first ascertain by means of an examination or otherwise whether there are relevant documents, then service of a notice to discover specifically identified documents follows. After deposing a knowledgeable employee of defendant’s technical or engineering staff, plaintiff will then be able to serve the requisite notice for discovery and inspection of documents identified with the appropriate specificity. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Evans, Sandler, Lane and Markewich, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Safety Central      

# Resource: Safety Central

This free app serves as a digital child ID kit that lets parents save children’s information, including photos and digital fingerprint images, to help law enforcement in the case of an emergency. The app, developed by the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, also includes a search feature for current missing children and the latest news, media, and child safety tips. 

http://view.exacttarget.com/?qs=5551b9f0e0f487330d1ee440c3c67a245198278fbfd233a7e0d64c067449fd51396c54fa92285f2da010cb8bbdf2293abca9946f3992ac34f1076a202ff213b5783ab1186f37377c&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources&utm_medium=federal-li...
#### 847.306 Transportation factors in the evaluation of offers.
#### 904.7001 Applicability.

The provisions of this subpart shall apply to all offeror(s), contractors, and subcontractors who will or do have access to classified information or a significant quantity of special nuclear material.

[49 FR 11941, Mar. 28, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9104, Feb. 25, 1994; 76 FR 7690, Feb. 11, 2011]
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2011- Of/i ^ 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED 

DOCKET OST 

LOVED & IMMUNIZED . ^ 

O^^ O ACTION DATE / 4 . (^, T^H 

This approval and grant of antitrust immunity is subject, where applicable, 

to conditions previously imposed. 

This action is etTective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 CFR 385.30 or ii review is undertaken on the Department's own motion, 

in view of theagreement's noncontroversial nature and the availability of 

the above QrtSc^urs^the 21;d^,^rjod^ 4 CF^ 303.42 is waived. 

30 November 2011 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

International Air Transport Association 

1776 K.St. N.W. #12"^ Floor 

Washington DC 20006
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Bentley, Appellant.

[777 NYS2d 431]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. *415FitzGerald, J.), rendered June 27, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree and sentencing him, as a persistent felony offender, to a term of 25 years to fife, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s guilt of depraved indifference assault (Penal Law § 120.10 [3]) was proven beyond a reasonable doubt and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant, who on a previous occasion had assaulted his ex-girlfriend after they had broken up, spontaneously stabbed her brother as he sought to protect his sister from another confrontation with defendant. Given such circumstances and the uncontroverted evidence that defendant stabbed his victim in the back, causing a 21⁄2-inch deep wound under his left armpit and a collapsed lung, as well as the treating physician’s testimony that such wound could possibly have been fatal, the jury reasonably concluded that the acts charged reflected defendant’s depraved indifference to human life and that his reckless infliction of serious physical injury on his victim created a grave risk of death.

We have considered defendant’s other points regarding the court’s charge on depraved indifference, its supplemental instruction concerning the order in which the jury could consider the charges, and the constitutionality of Penal Law § 120.10 (3) and find them either unpreserved or waived and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Finally, defendant’s claim that, after he spat in the prosecutor’s face, the court improperly increased his sentence is without merit and we find the sentence imposed appropriate. Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias and Friedman, JJ.