alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Lowell Thomas Redden, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00150

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 188th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 40208

- A ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Lowell Thomas Redden, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APR IL 22, 2020 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
6101.16 Subpoenas [Rule 16]. ( a ) *Expectation of cooperation in lieu of subpoena.* Subpoenas should rarely be necessary, as the Board expects parties to respond cooperatively to discovery requests and to try in good faith to secure the cooperation of third parties who have or may have evidence responsive to discovery requests.
( b ) *Generally.* The Board may issue a subpoena for a purpose for which a United States district court may issue a subpoena under Rule 45(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Parties and the Board shall take all reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden on a person subject to a subpoena.
( c ) *How requested; form.* A party may ask the Board to issue a subpoena by motion under Rule 8 (48 CFR 6101.8), substantially before the proposed compliance date. The movant shall attach to its motion a completed subpoena form for signing by a Board judge, and shall explain in the motion why the proposed subpoena scope is reasonable and how the evidence sought is relevant to the case.
( d ) *Production cost.* The Board's policy is to require a requesting party to advance a subpoenaed person the reasonable cost of producing subpoenaed material.
( e ) *Service.* The requesting party shall serve a subpoena and provide proof of service as would be required by Rule 45(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
( f ) *Motion to quash or modify.* On or before the date specified for compliance, a subpoenaed person may file a motion to quash or modify the subpoena for a reason stated in Rule 45(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Board may rule on the motion any time after the party that served the subpoena receives the motion.
( g ) *Enforcement.* As necessary, the Board may ask the Attorney General of the United States to petition a United States district court to enforce a Board subpoena.
( h ) *Letter rogatory in lieu of subpoena.* If a person to be subpoenaed resides in a foreign country, the Board may facilitate the issuance of a letter rogatory to the person by the United States Department of State under 28 U.S.C. 1781-1784.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           STDs in Adolescents and Young Adults      

# STDs in Adolescents and Young Adults

This report provides prevalence estimates of STDs among young people, including rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis, by age and state. 

http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats13/adol.htm?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
#### Ignazio De Saro, Respondent, v. Thomas Radigan, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property resulting from a rear-end collision when defendant’s automobile struck plaintiff’s automobile while it was stopped, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 18, 1964 and thereafter entered in *818Suffolk County, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, struck out defendant’s answer, and directed an assessment of damages. Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In our opinion, the record presents issues of fact which- should be resolved after a trial. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Michael Erdheim, Appellant, v Brion Travis, as Chair of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 920]

Cardona, PJ.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Malone, Jr., J.), entered November 6, 2003 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner is currently on work release, serving sentences imposed following his 1994 conviction of four counts of grand larceny in the second degree, one count of forgery in the second degree, one count of perjury in the first degree, and one count *877of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree *(People v Erdheim,*235 AD2d 216 [1997], *lvs denied*89 NY2d 1011, 1092 [1997]). The judgment of conviction arose out of incidents where petitioner, then a practicing attorney, misappropriated several hundred thousand dollars belonging to three clients. Petitioner appeared before the Board of Parole in December 2002, following which his application for early parole release was denied *(see*Correction Law § 803). That decision was affirmed on administrative appeal, and petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal.

If a Board determination complies with applicable statutory requirements, it is not subject to judicial review *(see*Executive Law § 259-i [5]; *Matter of Angel v Travis,*1 AD3d 859, 860 [2003]). This Court will intervene “only when there is a ‘showing of irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]; *see Matter of Rosario v Travis,*1 AD3d 792 [2003]). The record reveals that the Board considered the relevant factors, and made a discretionary determination that there was a reasonable probability that petitioner could not live at liberty without violating the law *(see Matter of Macklin v Travis,*274 AD2d 821, 821-822 [2000]). As we perceive nothing irrational in that finding, it will not be disturbed.

Petitioner next argues that he is entitled to presumptive release under Correction Law § 806. We need note only that the record does not indicate that petitioner applied for such release *(see*Correction Law § 806 [3]). Indeed, the statute did not take effect until well after petitioner’s application in the matter before us *(see*L 2003, ch 62, part E, § 15). As we are limited in a CPLR article 78 proceeding to reviewing “issues actually raised before the administrative agency making the determination,” petitioner is precluded from raising his argument regarding Correction Law § 806 *(Matter of Roggemann v Bane,*223 AD2d 854, 856 [1996]).

We have examined petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Mercure, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
9.108-1 Definitions. As used in this section— *Inverted domestic corporation* means a foreign incorporated entity that meets the definition of an inverted domestic corporation under 6 U.S.C. 395(b), applied in accordance with the rules and definitions of 6 U.S.C. 395(c).
*Subsidiary* means an entity in which more than 50 percent of the entity is owned— ( 1 ) Directly by a parent corporation; or
( 2 ) Through another subsidiary of a parent corporation.
[76 FR 31413, May 31, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 74556, Dec. 15, 2014]
970.2673-1 Policy. It is the policy of the DOE to be a constructive partner in the geographic region in which DOE conducts its business. The basic elements of this policy include— ( a ) Recognizing the diverse interests of the region and its stakeholders;
( b ) Engaging regional stakeholders in issues and concerns of mutual interest; and
( c ) Recognizing that giving back to the community is a worthwhile business practice.
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 68219, Nov. 5, 2010]
637.104 Personal services contracts. ( e ) The Office of the Legal Adviser is the DOS legal counsel for the purposes of FAR 37.104(e).
```

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11378-11379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03739]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Improvements Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be conducted. The 
Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and 
suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue 
Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, March 11, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 
or (510) 907-5274.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Assistance Center Improvements Project Committee will be held Thursday, 
March 11, 2021, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to 
participate must be made with Matthew O'Sullivan. For more information 
please contact Matthew O'Sullivan at 1-888-912-1227 or (510) 907-5274, 
or write TAP Office, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA 94612-5217 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will 
include various IRS issues.

[[Page 11379]]

    Dated: February 18, 2021.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2021-03739 Filed 2-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
##### 



Exhibit 31-7 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 I, J. Barry Mitchell, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PECO Energy Company;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 26, 2005
    /s/ J. Barry MitchellSenior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 33 (Monday, February 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 10594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Cancer 
Etiology Study Section, March 1, 2021, 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., 
National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD, 20892, which was published in the Federal Register on 
February 4, 2021, V-86 Pg. 8215.
    The meeting notice is amended to change the meeting's date from 
March 1, 2021 to March 2, 2021. The meeting start time and end time 
remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: February 16, 2021.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-03448 Filed 2-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### 952.204 Clauses related to administrative matters.
Exhibit 32.5

         Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
         --------------------------------------------------------------
                               United States Code
                               ------------------

         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
     Form 10-Q of PECO Energy  Company for the  quarterly  period ended June 30,
     2003,  that (i) the report fully complies with the  requirements of section
     13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and (ii) the
     information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of PECO Energy
     Company.



     Date:  July 30, 2003                   /s/ Michael B. Bemis
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Michael B. Bemis
                                            President
                                            Exelon Energy Delivery
817.501 General. ( d ) Agreements pursuant to FAR subpart 17.5, including construction, shall include a requirement, that, when acquiring goods and services on behalf of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the entity will comply, to the maximum extent feasible, with the provisions of 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128, and the Veterans First Contracting Program as implemented at subpart 819.70.
[84 FR 29393, July 24, 2019]
536.270-3 Evaluation. For sealed bidding that includes options: ( a ) The low bidder for purposes of award is the responsible bidder offering the lowest aggregate price for the base bid and all options designated to be evaluated.
( b ) Before opening bids that include options, the contracting officer must determine, and record in the contract file, the amount of funds available for the project. The amount recorded must be announced at the beginning of the bid opening. This amount may be increased later when determining the items to be awarded to the low bidder if the following condition is met: The award amount of the base bid and evaluated options does not exceed the amount offered for the base bid, the evaluated options, and the same combination of items by any other responsible bidder whose bid conforms to the solicitation. This requirement prevents the displacement of the low bidder by manipulating the options to be used.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report of AmBase Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Ferrara, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  May  13,
2010                                                            /s/
John P. Ferrara


John
P. Ferrara


Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller


AmBase
Corporation
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ramon Chimelis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries II, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  January 15, 2009

/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

President (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32.b**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCinergy Corp., The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, PSI Energy, Inc. andThe Union Light, Heat and Power Company (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, R. Foster Duncan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompanies.

 

 
| /s/ R. Foster Duncan    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| R. Foster Duncan        |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| May 7, 2004             |

 

----