alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
List of certain subsidiaries of Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S.A.B. de C.V.
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction
    
    
    Ownership InterestAeropuerto de Cancún, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    99.99
    %Aeropuerto de Cozumel, S.A. de C.V.(1)
    
    Mexico
    
    
    99.99
    %Aeropuerto de Mérida, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    99.99
    %Aeropuerto de Huatulco, S.A. de C.V.(2)
    
    Mexico
    
    
    99.99
    %Aeropuerto de Oaxaca, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    99.99
    %Aeropuerto de Veracruz, S.A. de C.V.(3)
    
    Mexico
    
    
    99.99
    %Aeropuerto de Villahermosa, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    99.99
    %Aeropuerto de Tapachula, S.A. de C.V.(4)
    
    Mexico
    
    
    99.99
    %Aeropuerto de Minatitlán, S.A. de C.V.(5)
    
    Mexico
    
    
    99.99
    %Servicios Aeroportuarios del Sureste, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    99.99
    %RH Asur, S.A. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    
    99.99
    %
 (1)
    
    As of January 2005, Aeropuerto de Cancún, S.A. de C.V., has an 18.1% equity participation in
this airport.(2)
    
    As of January 2005, Aeropuerto de Cancún, S.A. de C.V., has a 24.2% equity participation in
this airport.(3)
    
    As of January 2005, Aeropuerto de Cancún, S.A. de C.V., has an 8.9% equity participation in
this airport.(4)
    
    As of January 2005, Aeropuerto de Cancún, S.A. de C.V., has a 30.0% equity participation in
this airport.(5)
    
    As of October 2007, Aeropuerto de Cancún, S.A. de C.V., has a 23.4% equity participation in
this airport.
GC/MS Analysis 

The following represents the GC/Mass Spectroscopy for 

, the primary starting material used to make the notified substance [CASRN 

 

Because the notified substance readily hydrolyzes in water, it cannot be directly analyzed 

spectroscopically due to the nature of the test medium. However, the structural composition of the 

starting material is highly indicative of the analogous composition of the final notified substance, 

because the carbon chain lengths and structures of are not altered in the reaction with 

 

Figure 1. GC/MS trace 

1. Glycerol

2. D8-diethanolamine & diethanolamine

3. Dodecanoic acid methyl ester

4. 1 ng Decylbenzene (internal standard)

5. Tetradecanoic acid methyl ester

6. Hexadecanoic acid methyl ester

5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00

1000000

2000000

3000000

4000000

5000000

6000000

7000000

8000000

9000000

 1e+07

 1.1e+07

 1.2e+07

 1.3e+07

 1.4e+07

 1.5e+07

 1.6e+07

 1.7e+07

 1.8e+07

 1.9e+07

 2e+07

 2.1e+07

 2.2e+07

 2.3e+07

Time-->

Abundance

TIC: MD10313.D\data.ms

[ ]

[ ] [ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]
GC/MS Analysis 

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

Figure 2. Mass trace of 

40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

110000

120000

130000

140000

m/z-->

Abundance

Scan 1381 (11.807 min): MD10313.D\data.ms

73

147

205

117

103

133

218

45 59 175

89 191

163 263 293

[ ] [ ]

[ ] [ ] [ [ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]
GC/MS Analysis 

Figure 3. Mass trace of 

Figure 4. Mass trace of 

40 60 80 100120140160180200220240260280300320340360 0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

180000

200000

220000

240000

260000

m/z-->

Abundance

Scan 1754 (14.973 min): MD10313.D\data.ms

74

43

143

59 171

129 101115 157 185 214

199 359

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0

200000

400000

600000

800000

1000000

1200000

1400000

1600000

1800000

2000000

2200000

2400000

2600000

m/z-->

Abundance

Scan 2831 (24.115 min): MD10313.D\data.ms 146

73 116 298 416

201 248

175 43

95 224 270 340 388 318 360 504

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]
GC/MS Analysis 

Figure 5. Mass trace of 

Sample preparation

A known amount of is weighed. Trimethylsilyl (TMS) derivative was synthesized to 

facilitate gas chromatograph of the polar compounds. The sample was treated with a 2:1 solution of 

N,O-bistrimethylsilyl-trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) in pyridine with decylbenzene as an internal standard. 

The reaction of this very reactive reagent with compounds with acidic proton(s) is immediate and 

quantitative.

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

800000

900000

1000000

1100000

1200000

m/z-->

Abundance

Scan 3164 (26.941 min): MD10313.D\data.ms

146

73 116

43 201 248 354 472 175

95 224 270294 326 374396416444

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]
719.273-6 Application process. Entities interested in becoming a Mentor firm must apply in writing to the USAID Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) by submitting form AID 321-1 (OMB Control number 0412-0574 approved on 5/22/2007). The application shall contain the Mentor-Protégé Agreement and shall be evaluated for approval. Evaluations will consider the nature and extent of technical and managerial support as well as any proposed financial assistance in the form of equity investment, loans, joint-venture, and traditional subcontracting support. The Mentor-Protégé Agreement must contain: ( a ) Names, addresses, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses (if available) of Mentor and Protégé firm(s) and a point of contact for both Mentor and Protégé;
( b ) A description of the developmental assistance that will be provided by the Mentor to the Protégé, including a description of the work or product contracted for (if any), a schedule for providing assistance, and criteria for evaluation of the Protégé's developmental success;
( c ) A listing of the number and types of subcontracts to be awarded to the Protégé;
( d ) Duration of the Agreement, including rights and responsibilities of both parties (Mentor and Protégé);
( e ) Termination procedures, including procedures for the parties' voluntary withdrawal from the Program. The Agreement shall require the Mentor or the Protégé to notify the other firm in writing at least 30 days in advance of its intent to voluntarily terminate the Agreement;
( f ) Procedures requiring the parties to notify OSDBU immediately upon receipt of termination notice from the other party;
( g ) A plan for accomplishing the work or product contracted for should the Agreement be terminated; and
( h ) Other terms and conditions, as appropriate.
é eae ee
ttre
GEOLOGIC MAP OF WORKINGS OF THE BLACK HORSE MINE, SHOSHONE COUNTY, IDAHO
genes aE ae
**Exhibit 32.1**

  

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of VillageEDOCS, Inc. (the "Company") onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:: 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

| Date:  March 31, 2009           | /s/ K. Mason Conner           |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                        | Chief Executive Officer                                                         |

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BYSECTION 906, OR OTHER DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISEADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSIONOF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TOVILLAGEEDOCS AND WILL BE RETAINED BY VILLAGEEDOCS AND FURNISHED TO THESECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### Emin Dulger, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 22, 1979, which granted defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. It was not an abuse of discretion for the court to grant the motion to vacate the default judgment. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Rabin, Gulotta and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32-8** **Certificate    Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of    Title 18 United States Code**     The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the quarterly    report on    Form 10-Q    of PECO Energy Company for the quarterly period ended    June 30, 2007, that (i) the report fully complies with    the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information    contained in the report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of    PECO Energy Company. /s/  John    F. Young    John F. Young    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date: July 25, 2007
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                            PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               6,480,222
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>               473,292
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,972,992
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                1,005,820
<OTHER-ASSETS>                            738,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         10,671,163
<COMMON>                                    1,589
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>               1,612,572
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                     1,130,387
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>          2,744,548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                81,354
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                    3,058,406
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                        746,778
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>              32,475
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>          4,007,602
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>          10,671,163
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>               1,769,514
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                       44,754
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              1,602,207
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>              1,646,961
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                   122,553
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                          6,950
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>            129,503
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   53,113
<NET-INCOME>                               76,390
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 1,275
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>              75,115
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   71,114
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                  17,587
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                    227,426
<EPS-BASIC>                                0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.47


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00465-CV

Adolfo R. MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

Noel P. BENAVIDES; Pablo A. Martinez, Inc.; Dr. Javier Tadeo Ramirez; Judith Christina R. 

Barrera, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Evangelina H. Ramirez; Maria Cecilia R. 

Benavides, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Evangelina H. Ramirez; 

Claudia R. Mathers; and Leticia R. Reyes,

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-03-350

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the trial court’s order 

denying the motion for reinstatement is AFFIRMED. 

It is ORDERED that Appellees Noel P. Benavides; Pablo A. Martinez, Inc.; Dr. Javier 

Tadeo Ramirez; Judith Christina R. Barrera, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of 

Evangelina H. Ramirez; Maria Cecilia R. Benavides, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate 

of Evangelina H. Ramirez; Claudia R. Mathers; and Leticia R. Reyes recover their costs on appeal 

from Appellant Adolfo R. Martinez.

SIGNED June 1, 2016.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
# Patent

## Title
Novel interferon alphas

## Abstract

It will be apparent that various changes may be made in the method as described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention or sacrificing its material advantages, the forms hereinbefore described being merely preferred embodiments thereof. number 06/635, 134, filed July 27, 1984. 10-19, (1975).

## Background
## Claims

1. A method of depyrogenating a pyrogenic blood product which comprises providing a pyrogenic blood product, and adding an endotoxin inactivating amount of endotoxin inactivator derived from blood and characterized as follows: adsorbent; and

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the endotoxin inactivator is provided in essentially pure form.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the inactivator is capable of inactivating at least about:

4. The method of claim 2, wherein the endotoxin inactivator is provided in essentially pure form by subjecting an endotoxin-inactivator-containing fraction of blood to DEAE-sephadex chromatography, immobilized chromophore blue chromatography, and hydroxyapatite chromatography.

5. The method of claim 2 in which the endotoxin inactivator is essentially stable.

6. An essentially nonpyrogenic blood product suitable for parenteral administration consisting essentially of a first blood protein and an essentially stable endotoxin inactivator derived from blood.

7. The product of claim 6 in which the first blood protein is an immunoglobulin.

8. The product of claim 6 in which the first blood protein is antihemophilic factor.

9. The product of claim 6 in which the first blood protein is Factor IX.

10. The product of claim 6 in which the first blood protein is an interferon.

11. A method for the purification of Factor IX complex and endotoxin inactivator from which comprises: eluting buffer containing about 0.2-0.3M NaCl; 2M NaCl; Cibacron-blue Sepharose chromatography to yield a further purified endotoxin inactivator; and hydroxyapatite chromatography to yield endotoxin inactivator in essentially pure form.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6937
KEVIN FIDEL ROBINSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SAMUEL V. PRUETT, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-95-168) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Fidel Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for default judgment, deny a certificate ofappealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Pruett , No. CA-95-168 (E.D. Va. June 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### 970.2570-1 Contract clause.

Contracting officers shall insert the clauses at 48 CFR 52.225-1, Buy American Act—Supplies, and 48 CFR 52.225-9, Buy American Act—Construction Materials, in management and operating contracts. The clause at 48 CFR 52.225-1 shall be modified in paragraph (d) of this section by substituting the word “use” for the word “deliver.”
#### Thomas F. Jackson, appellee, v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, appellant.

Assumpsit upon policy insuring against loss by robbery. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. William F. Borders, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1926.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 9, 1926.

McGlynn & McGlynn, for appellant.

Louis Beasley and Edward C. Zulley, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Understanding the ACA and Insurance Marketplaces      

# Understanding the ACA and Insurance Marketplaces

Resources on HealthCare.gov can help youth workers, as well as young people and their families, learn more about the Affordable Care Act and the forthcoming Health Insurance Marketplace. The site includes basic information about health insurance, videos that explain how the Marketplace will affect young people without insurance, and information on finding lower cost coverage. Anyone can sign up to receive e-mail or text updates, start a live chat with an expert to ask questions, and follow the hashtag #Words2know to learn terms that will be helpful to know when navigating the Marketplace. 

https://www.healthcare.gov/
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10315 

To withhold bilateral, multilateral, and humanitarian non-defense foreign assistance with respect to which of the President has declared a disaster 

under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 5, 2024 

Mr. STEUBE (for himself, Mr. NEHLS, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. POSEY, and Mr. 

TIFFANY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To withhold bilateral, multilateral, and humanitarian nondefense foreign assistance with respect to which of the 

President has declared a disaster under the Robert T. 

Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing Taxpayer As5 sistance during Natural Disasters Act’’ or the ‘‘STAND 

6 Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 10315 IH

1 SEC. 2. WITHHOLDING OF BILATERAL, MULTILATERAL, 

2 AND HUMANITARIAN NON-DEFENSE FOREIGN 

3 ASSISTANCE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—No Federal funds may be obli5 gated or expended by the Department of State or the 

6 United States Agency for International Development for 

7 bilateral, multilateral, or humanitarian non-defense for8 eign assistance within 60 days of the date on which a dis9 aster has occurred and with respect to which of the Presi10 dent has declared a disaster under the Robert T. Stafford 

11 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 5121 et seq.). 

13 (b) WAIVER.—The prohibition under subsection (a) 

14 may be waived in accordance with the provisions of a joint 

15 resolution providing for such waiver that is enacted into 

16 law after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### 928.101 Bid guarantees.
#### Marion S. Penn, Respondent, v Gregg Attanasio et al., Appellants.

[776 NYS2d 880]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Aliotta, J.), dated April 18, 2003, which granted the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants on the issue of liability and for a new trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the jury verdict and for a new trial. Ritter, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.