alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



CERTIFICATION



I, William E. Hantke, Chief Financial Officer of Premcor Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows with respect to the Company:



| | 1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification on this 30th day of April 2004.



By:

/S/    WILLIAM E. HANTKEChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Premcor Inc. and will be retained by Premcor Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000081020
<NAME> PSI ENERGYLINE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,627,867
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         688,407
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       534,861
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 101,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,952,445
<COMMON>                                           539
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      410,742
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            623,759
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,035,040
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     71,911
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           968,305
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             379,862
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   31,822
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,465,505
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,952,445
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      707,193
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            10,400
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     659,721
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     670,121
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         37,072
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (2,613)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  34,459
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        19,620
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,839
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,150
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   13,689
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       18,827
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          61,443
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Exhibit 13



906 Certification



The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) for
the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to be deemed filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933 or the Exchange Act.



Jason C.S. Chang, the Chief Executive Officer,
and Joseph Tung, the Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 21, 2017



| | By: | /s/Jason C.S. Chang
| | --- | -------------------
| |     | Name:              
| |     | Title:             



| | By: | /s/ Joseph Tung
| | --- | ---------------
| |     | Name:          
| |     | Title:
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00300

- CR

GONZALO RINCON

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 17FC

- 4593G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause o n appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
July 18, 2019
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002  I,
Paul D. Finkelstein certify that:  1.I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the annual report on
Form 10-K of Regis Corporation;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  October
29, 2010  /s/
  PAUL D. FINKELSTEINPaul
  D. Finkelstein,Chairman of the Board of Directors, 
  President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 26 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 26

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2023

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in 
            approving the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress disapproves 
of the action of the District of Columbia Council described as follows: 
The 

              

Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022 (D.C. Act 24-789), enacted by the 
Council of the District of Columbia on January 17, 2023, and 
transmitted to Congress pursuant to section 602(c)(1) of the District 
of Columbia Home Rule Act on January 27, 2023.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 9, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### 552.238-76 Use of Non-Government Employees to Review Offers.

As prescribed in 538.273(c)(2), insert the following provision:

# Use of Non-Government Employees to Review Offers (MAY 2019)

(a) The Government may employ individual technical consultants/advisors/contractors from the below listed organizations to review limited portions of the technical, management and price proposals to assist the government in both pre-award and post-award functions. [The contracting officer should insert a list of organizations used to review solicitation responses and execute a non-disclosure and organizational conflict of interest statement for all individuals conducting reviews.]

*____*

(b) These representatives will be used to advise on specific technical, management, and price matters and shall not, under any circumstances, be used as voting evaluators. However, the Government may consider the advice provided in its evaluation process. In addition, Contractor personnel may be used in specific contract administration tasks (e.g., administrative filing, review of deliverables, etc.).

(c) If individual technical consultants/advisors/contractors are utilized as described in (b) above, they will be required to execute a non-disclosure and organizational conflict of interest statements.

(End of provision)

[84 FR 17042, Apr. 23, 2019]
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
AMCORE Financial, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 33-
10446) on Form S-8 of AMCORE Financial, Inc. of our report dated January 17,
2001, except as to the fourth and fifth paragraphs of Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements which is as of March 9, 2001, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of AMCORE Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2000, and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained
earnings, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000, annual report
on Form 10-K of AMCORE Financial, Inc.


[KPMG LOGO]

Chicago, Illinois
March 16, 2001
#### 852.273-74 Award without exchanges.

As prescribed in 873.110(e), insert the following provision:

# Award Without Exchanges (NOV 2021)

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without exchanges with Offerors. Therefore, each initial proposal should contain the Offeror's best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct exchanges if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Recovery.gov      

# Recovery.gov

Recovery.gov is the U.S. Government's official website to provide easy access to data related to Recovery Act spending.

http://www.ed.gov/open/plan/recovery-gov
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Geology and fuel resources ofthe southern part of the San Juan Basin, New Mexico. Part 2, The Mount Taylorcoal field**
 
Report | Plates: 2930313233343638
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:860-B
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000963734
 
October 5, 2018
#### 752.229-71 Reporting of Foreign Taxes

As prescribed in (48 CFR) AIDAR 729.402-70(b), insert the following clause in applicable solicitations and resulting contracts. The contracting officer must insert the address and point of contact at the Embassy, Mission, or M/CFO/CMP as appropriate under paragraph (d) of this clause.

# Reporting of Foreign Taxes (Jul 2023)

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause—

*Foreign government* includes any foreign governmental entity.

*Foreign taxes* include value-added taxes and customs duties but not individual income taxes assessed to local staff.

*Local staff* means Cooperating Country National employees.

(b) *Annual report.* (1) The Contractor must submit a report detailing foreign taxes assessed under this contract during the prior U.S. government fiscal year. The report must be submitted annually by April 16.

(2) A report is required even if the Contractor did not pay any foreign taxes during the reporting period. A cumulative report may be provided if the Contractor is performing more than one award in the foreign country.

(c) *Contents of report.* The report must contain:

(1) Contractor name.

(2) Contact name with phone number and email address.

(3) Contract number(s).

(4) Amount of foreign taxes assessed by each foreign government (listed separately) under this contract during the prior U.S. Government fiscal year.

(i) Taxes assessed on any individual transaction of less than $500 should not be reported.

(ii) The Contractor must report only foreign taxes assessed by a foreign government receiving U.S. assistance under this contract. The Contractor must not report on foreign taxes assessed by a third-party foreign government.

(5) Any reimbursements of foreign taxes received by the Contractor on the taxes reported in paragraph (c)(4) of this clause received through the date of the report.

(d) *Submission of report.* The Contractor must submit the report to: [*Contracting Officer must insert address and point of contact at the Embassy or Mission in the country in which the contract will be performed, or CFO/CMP for USAID/W-issued contracts, as appropriate*], with a copy to the Contracting Officer's Representative.

(e) *Subcontracts.* The Contractor must include this reporting requirement in all subcontracts issued under this contract. The Contractor shall collect and incorporate into the Contractor's report all information received from subcontractors pursuant to this clause.

(End of clause)

[88 FR 39192, June 15, 2023]
#### 836.573 Contractor production report.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.236-79, Contractor Production Report, in solicitations and contracts for construction expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may, when in the best interest of the Government, insert the clause in solicitations and contracts for construction when the contract amount is expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition threshold.

[84 FR 9972, Mar. 19, 2019]
#### In the Matter of Expert Electric, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Phillip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, *814New York County, entered March 7, 1978, denying petitioners’ application and dismissing the petition in this article 78 proceeding, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the petition only to the extent of fixing the date for reinstatement of petitioners’ apprentice program after January 27, 1979, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements on the appeal. Respondent’s order of May 1, 1975, deregistering the apprenticeship training program was, by its terms, "effective immediately.” Judicial review of that order was sought in the Federal court *(Expert Elec, v Levine,*554 F2d 1227, cert den 434 US 903), and by commencement of an article 78 proceeding *(Matter of United Constr. Contrs. Assn, v Levine,*52 AD2d 371, mot for lv to app den 39 NY2d 711). Pending disposition of the State court proceeding, the May 1, 1975 order had been stayed by order entered September 6, 1975 (Supreme Ct, Albany County, Index No. 8851/75, Harold J. Hughes, J.). After the denial of leave to appeal by the Court of Appeals, respondent issued an order on July 29, 1977, fixing the period of disqualification to terminate June 2, 1979, so as to give effect to the maximum three-year period of disqualification provided for by 12 NYCRR 601.8, the said period commencing from June 3, 1976, the date the Appellate Division, Third Department, confirmed respondent’s determination. Special Term, in denying in its entirety the application to review the July 29, 1977 order, failed to credit petitioners with the period of time between May 1, 1975 and September 6, 1975, during which time the prior order of May 1, 1975 had not been stayed. The modification herein credits petitioners with the four-month, six-day period prior to issuance of the stay so as to properly conform to 12 NYCRR 601.8. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sullivan, Lane, Markewich and Silver-man, JJ.
#### 970.3770-2 [Reserved]
#### 942.270-1 Contracting Officer's Representatives.

In accordance with internal agency procedures, a contracting officer may designate other qualified personnel to be the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) for the purpose of performing certain technical functions in administering a contract. These functions include, but are not limited to, technical monitoring, inspection, approval of shop drawings, testing, and approval of samples. The COR acts solely as a technical representative of the contracting officer and is not authorized to perform any function that results in a change in the scope, price, terms or conditions of the contract. COR designations must be made in writing by the contracting officer, and shall identify the responsibilities and limitations of the designation. A copy of the COR designation must be furnished to the contractor and the contract administration office.
#### 552.238-73 Identification of Electronic Office Equipment Providing Accessibility for Individuals with Disabilities.

As prescribed in 538.273(b)(1), insert the following clause:

# Identification of Electronic Office Equipment Providing Accessibility for Individuals With Disabilities (MAR 2022)

(a) *Definitions.*

*Electronic office equipment accessibility* means the application/configuration of electronic office equipment (includes hardware, software and firmware) in a manner that accommodates the functional limitations of individuals with disabilities (as defined below) so as to promote productivity and provide access to work related and/or public information resources.

*Individuals with disabilities* means qualified individuals with impairments as defined in 29 U.S.C. 705(20) who can benefit from electronic office equipment accessibility.

*Special peripheral* means a special needs aid that provides access to electronic equipment that is otherwise inaccessible to individuals with disabilities.

(b) The offeror is encouraged to identify in its offer and include in any commercial catalogs and pricelists accepted by the Contracting Officer, office equipment, including any special peripheral, that will facilitate electronic office equipment accessibility for individuals with disabilities. Identification should include the type of disability accommodated and how the users with that disability would be helped.

(End of clause)

[87 FR 6045, Feb. 3, 2022]
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Karen George-Bauchand v. Sadie Lewis

Appellate case number: 01-18-00310-CV

Trial court case number: 16-07-23814

Trial court: County Court at Law of Waller County

Appellant, Karen George-Bauchand, filed a letter on October 18, 2018 asking this 

Court to: (1) order appellee, Sadie Lewis, to forward a copy of her brief to appellant and 

grant appellant additional time to file a reply brief, or (2) strike appellee’s brief for failing 

to serve appellant with her response. 

We grant the motion, in part, and order that appellant’s reply brief, if any, must be 

filed with the clerk of this court on or before November 1, 2018. Appellee’s letter brief, 

which was filed on September 5, 2018, is available on the court’s web site. The motion to 

strike appellee’s brief is denied. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

Acting individually 

Date: October 18, 2018