alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Take Action Today: How Faith Leaders Can Support Bullying Prevention Efforts in the Community      

# Take Action Today: How Faith Leaders Can Support Bullying Prevention Efforts in the Community

This blog post illustrates how the Sikh Coalition has worked to increase awareness of bullying and the importance of working in partnership to end bullying of students of all backgrounds. It also provides links to resources specifically for faith leaders on preventing and responding to bullying. 

http://www.stopbullying.gov/blog/2014/12/09/take-action-today-how-faith-leaders-can-support-bullying-prevention-efforts-community?utm_source=Find%20Youth%20Info&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 28, 2007, (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 24, 2008
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ Andrew J. Norstrud 
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### 731.771 [Reserved]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                     CONSENT  OF  INDEPENDENT  ACCOUNTANTS
                     -------------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-61617),
and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-30229) of United Water
Resources of our report dated February 25, 1998, appearing on page 33 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the
heading "Experts" in the Prospectus constituting part of the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-61617).


PRICE  WATERHOUSE  LLP
New York, New York
March 23, 1998
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Joseph Berry, Appellant.

Motion by appellant for reargument of his appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Queens County, rendered June 24, 1959 after a jury trial, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and imposing sentence. On July 5, 1961, we affirmed the judgment of conviction *(People*v. *Berry,*14 A D 2d 553). The conviction rested in part on testimony by an Assistant District Attorney that on the morning after defendant’s arraignment the defendant, in the absence of counsel, admitted to him (the assistant) that he had told the detectives that he had committed the crime charged. Appellant now moves for reargument on the basis of a subsequent decision rendered in October, 1961, by the Appellate Division in the First Department, which was affirmed on April 5, 1962 by a 4 to 3 decision of the Court of Appeals *(People*v. *Meyer,*14 A D 2d 241, affd. 11 N Y 2d 162). In the *Meyer*case it was held that voluntary postarraignment statements made by a defendant in the absence of counsel are inadmissible. The motion for reargument is denied. In our opinion, the *Meyer*ease is inapplicable for two reasons: (1) In *Meyer,*objection to the admission of the testimony was duly made during the trial. Here, no objection whatever was made to the reception of the testimony during the trial; objection is raised for the first time on this application for reargument. Such belated objection is an inadequate ground for reversal even if it be assumed that the testimony was inadmissible (cf. *People*v. *Friola,*11 N Y 2d 157, April 5, 1962). (2) We believe, however, that the testimony here was in fact admissible, whereas in *Meyer*it was not. In *Meyer,*the defendant’s postarraignment statement was made in the course of his interrogation upon the crime charged against him; it formed an integral part of the then pending criminal proceeding; and, consequently, it may be said to have been induced by “ testimonial compulsion.” But here the defendant’s postarraignment statement in which, he admitted the commission of the robbery, was a wholly collateral statement made by him to the Assistant District Attorney in the course of the latter’s investigation of a different and independent charge, to wit: the charge of extortion *made by the defendant himself*against police officers. In view of the setting and the occasion here, the defendant’s inculpatory statement had none of the elements of “testimonial compulsion; ” it was not a part or an incident of the proceedings relating to the crime of robbery for which he had been previously arraigned. Under no circumstances could the investigation of the extortion charge *made by the*defendant against others be said to have operated as “ testimonial compulsion ” to confess to the crime of robbery charged *against*him. Therefore, in the absence of any element of “ testimonial compulsion,” it was not error to admit the testimony in question; and it was not error even under the decisions in *Meyer*(cf. *People*v. *Di Biasi,*7 N Y 2d 544, 551; *People*v. *Waterman,*9 N Y 2d 561, 564). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 15








May 14, 1999








Pennsylvania Power Company
1 E. Washington Street
P. O. Box 891
New Castle, PA  16103

Gentlemen:

We are aware that Pennsylvania Power Company has incorporated by 
reference in its Registration Statements No. 33-62450 and No. 33-
65156 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999, which 
includes our report dated May 14, 1999 covering the unaudited 
interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to 
Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is not 
considered a part of the registration statements prepared or 
certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our 
firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                    Very truly yours,




                                    ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-30151

MELINDA CORTEZ RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

ADMIRAL LEE TOWING INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(94-CV-1583)

November 12, 1996

Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIUM: *

Appellant Melinda Rodriguez brought wrongful death claims

under the Jones Act against Appellee Admiral Lee Towing, asserting

that her husband’s suicide was a result of (1) suffering brought on

by an on the job injury and/or (2) failure of the Appellee to pay

the late Mr. Rodriguez’s medical expenses. The court for the2

Eastern District of Louisiana granted summary judgment in favor of

the Appellee, ruling the suicide to be a superseding cause of Mr.

Rodriguez’s death, and thereby removing the possibility of a trier

of fact finding the Appellee liable.

A s in her argument before the district court, the Appellant

does not contend on appeal that Mr. Rodriguez’s demise was the

product of insa nity or an irresistible impulse. Rather, she

contends that legal causation should have been permitted to go to

the jury and th at the focus of our inquiry should not be on “the

elusive mental state” of the deceased. The trial court relied on

the well-established rule that

if one is sane, or if the suicide is during a lucid interval,

when one is in full command of all f aculties, but life has

become unendurable by reason of the injury, it is agreed in

negligence cases that the voluntary choice of sui cide is an

abnormal thing, which supersedes the defendant’s liability.

W. Page Keeton et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 44,

at 311 (5th ed. 1984)( citing Arsnow v. Red Top Cab. Co.

, 292 P. 436

(Wash. 1930); Tucson Rapid Transit Co. v. Tocci

, 414 P.2d 179

(Ariz. App. 1966); Lancaster v. Montesi

, 390 S.W.2d 217 (Tenn.

1965); Stasiof v. Chicago Hoist & Body Co

., 200 N.E.2d 88 (Ill.

A pp. 1964); W allace v. Bounds

, 369 S.W.2d 138 (Mo. 1963);

McLaughlin v. Sullivan

, 461 A.2d 123 (N.H. 1983)). S ee also

Jamison v. Storer Broadcasting Co.

, 511 F.Supp. 1286, 1291-92 (E.D.

Mich. 1981); Halko v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.

, 677

F.Supp. 135, 142 (S.D.N.Y. 1987); Restatement (Second) of Torts §3

455 (1965).

We conclude that the district court did not commit error in

applying the rule to the present case. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
#### In the Matter of Jordan Cemetery Association, Inc., Respondent, v. Cemetery Board of the State of New York, Appellant.

In a proceeding, purportedly pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 87 of the Membership Corporations Law, for an order approving the issuance of certificates of indebtedness as consideration for the purchase of cemetery lands, the Cemetery Board appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 9, 1962, which determined after a hearing (see 33 Mise 2d 274) that the purchase price of $1,000,000 in cash was fair and reasonable and which also determined that if payment was to be made by certificates of indebtedness the fair and reasonable market value of the property was $8,000,000. Order reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed, without costs, solely upon the ground that the issues have become moot (cf. *Matter of Adirondack League Club*v. *Board of Black Biv. Regulating List.,*301 N. Y. 219, 223). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: 3Ts Toolkit for Reducing Lead in Drinking Water      

# Resource: 3Ts Toolkit for Reducing Lead in Drinking Water

This toolkit helps school officials responsible for the maintenance and/or safety of schools’ drinking water implement prevention programs for lead in drinking water. The toolkit introduces the 3Ts for an approach to reducing lead in drinking water: training, testing, and telling. 

http://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/lead-drinking-water-schools-and-childcare-facilities?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resources
IB 

Union Calendar No. 17 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1023 

[Report No. 118–26] 

To repeal section 134 of the Clean Air Act, relating to the greenhouse 

gas reduction fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Mr. PALMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Additional sponsors: Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. 

CURTIS, and Mr. ALLEN

MARCH 23, 2023 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce; committed to the 

Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered 

to be printed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1023 RH

A BILL 

To repeal section 134 of the Clean Air Act, relating to 

the greenhouse gas reduction fund. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1023 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION 

4 FUND. 

5 (a) REPEAL.—Section 134 of the Clean Air Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 7434)(relating to the greenhouse gas reduction 

7 fund) is repealed. 

8 (b) RESCISSION.—The unobligated balance of any 

9 amounts made available under section 134 of the Clean 

10 Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7434)(as in effect on the day before 

11 the date of enactment of this Act) is rescinded. 

12 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 60103 of 

13 Public Law 117–169 (relating to the greenhouse gas re14 duction fund) is repealed. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Union Calendar No. 17 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1023 

[Report No. 118–26] 

A BILL 

To repeal section 134 of the Clean Air Act, relating 

to the greenhouse gas reduction fund. 

MARCH 23, 2023 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### 801.104 Applicability.

The FAR and the VAAR apply to all FAR-based VA actions using appropriated funds unless otherwise specified in this regulation. Supply Fund monies (38 U.S.C. 8121) and General Post Funds (38 U.S.C. 8302) are appropriated funds.
816.203-4 Contract clauses. ( e ) The contracting officer shall, when contracting by negotiation, use the following clauses. ( 1 ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.216-71, “Economic Price Adjustment of Contract Price(s) Based on a Price Index,” in solicitations and firm fixed price contracts, subject to FAR 16.203-4(d)(1) and when changes to a price index will be used to calculate corresponding changes to the total contract price or unit prices of the contract. ( i ) Exceptions: ( A ) Do not use this clause when changes to the price index will apply to only a component part of the contract price.
( B ) Do not publish or include the footnotes in the solicitation, they are only included herein to provide guidance to contracting officers.
( 2 ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.216-72, “Proportional Economic Price Adjustment of Contract Price(s) Based on a Price Index,” in solicitations and firm fixed price contracts, and subject to FAR 16.203-4(d)(1) when changes to an industry price index shall be used to calculate changes to only a portion of the contract price or the unit prices of the contract. ( i ) Exceptions: ( A ) The clause should not be used when a change in the index price will be applied directly and totally to the contract price or the unit prices, *i.e.,* when the Consumer Price Index is used to calculate changes and a 5% increase in the CPI would result in a 5% increase in the total contract price of the unit prices.
( B ) Do not publish or include the footnotes in the solicitation, as they are only provided for guidance to the contracting officer.
( 3 ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.216-73, “Economic Price Adjustment—State Nursing Home Care for Veterans,” in solicitations and firm fixed price contracts subject to FAR 16.203-4(d)(1) and the following circumstance: When changes to the Medicaid rate, as authorized by the State Medicaid Agency (SMA), shall be used to calculate corresponding changes in the total contract price or the per diem prices of the agreement or contract.
( 4 ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.216-74, “Economic Price Adjustment—Medicaid Labor Rates,” in solicitations and firm fixed price contracts when the conditions specified in FAR 16.203-4(c)(1) apply. The clause is modifiable by increasing the 10-percent maximum limit on aggregate increases specified in paragraph (c)(4) of this section, upon the approval by the Head of the Contracting Activity (HCA) or designee.
( 5 ) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.216-75, “Economic Price Adjustment—Fuel Surcharge,” in solicitations and firm fixed price contracts when contracting by negotiation is subject to changes in the cost of fuel increases. The clause is subject to the conditions at FAR 16.203-4(d)(1).
( f ) The contracting officer shall follow procedures as prescribed in FAR 16.203-4(c) and 38 CFR 51.41(b)(1) for EPA fixed price contracts based on Medicaid rates. These procedures shall be used when contracting by negotiation between the VA and the State Veteran Home for making payments under contracts for nursing home care for Veterans.
#### 919.502-2 Total small business set-asides.

In considering set-asides in the area of architect engineer contracts, contracting personnel must first consider the special procedures required by the Brooks Act, Pub. L. 92-582 pertaining to this type acquisition.
§ 1.301 Basis, purpose and scope. ( a ) *Basis.* This subpart implements the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, Public Law No. 99-509, Sections 6101-6104, 100 Stat. 1874 (1986). This statute added 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812. Section 3809 of Title 31, United States Code, requires the Secretary to promulgate regulations necessary to implement the provisions of the statute.
( b ) *Purpose.* This subpart— ( 1 ) Establishes administrative procedures for imposing civil penalties and assessments against persons who make, submit, or present, or cause to be made, submitted, or presented, false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims or written statements to authorities or to their agents, and
( 2 ) Specifies the hearing and appeal rights of persons subject to allegations of liability for such penalties and assessments.
( c ) *Scope.* The procedures for imposing civil penalties and assessments established by this subpart are intended to enhance existing administrative enforcement efforts against fraud and to provide an additional remedy against false, fictitious, and fraudulent claims and statements in the programs administered by this Department.
925.7101 Policy. ( a ) DOE and its contractors must comply with all applicable U.S. export control laws and regulations.
( b ) Export control laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 *et seq.*), as amended; the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 *et seq.*); the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. app. 2401 *et seq.*), as continued under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (Title II of Pub. L. 95-223, 91 Stat. 1626, October 28, 1977; 50 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*); Trading with the Enemy Act (50 U.S.C. App. 5(b), as amended by the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961); Assistance to Foreign Atomic Energy Activities (Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 810); Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730 through 774); International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR parts 120 through 130); Export and Import of Nuclear Equipment and Material (10 CFR part 110); and regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury (31 CFR parts 500 through 598).
( c ) Contractors seeking guidance on how to comply with export control laws and regulations should review the illustrative list of laws and regulations set forth in Clause 952.225-71. Contractors also may contact the agencies responsible for administration of export laws or regulations applicable to a particular export (*e.g.,* Departments of State, Commerce, Treasury and Energy, or the Nuclear Regulatory Commission).
( d ) DOE Contracting Officers will not answer contractor questions regarding how to comply with U.S. export laws and regulations. Contracting Officers should direct contractors to the export laws, regulations, and agencies cited in the Export Clause at section 952.225-71 of this subpart.
( e ) It is the contractor's responsibility to comply with all applicable export control laws and regulations. This responsibility exists independent of, and is not established or limited by, this subpart.