alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
--- 

~-

SunCoke Energy 

December ih, 2012 

Mr. JohnS. Lyons, Director 

Kentucky Division for Air Quality 

200 Fair Oaks Lane 

Frankfort, KY 40601 

Subject: Sun Coke Energy South Shore LLC 

Application for Major New Source Initial Operating Permit 

Dear Mr. Lyons: 

David J. Schwake 

Director , North Americas 

Strategy & Business Development 

SunCoke Energy, Inc. 

1011 Warrenville Road 

Suite 600 

Lisle, IL 60532 

630 824 1000 Phone 

630 824 1001 Fax 

SunCoke Energy, Inc. is pleased to submit a Major New Source permit application for our proposed 

new coke-making facility in South Shore, Ke.ntucky. This application contains information required 

by the Kentucky Division for Air Quality (KDAQ} to evaluate the project and issue a new Title V 

permit authorizing construction and operation of the facility as a new major source. 

A permit application for this project was previously submitted in February 2011. The proposed 

facility is to be located on the same property as the originally requested facility, but the facility is 

now smaller (120 ovens compared to the previous 200 ovens) and this new application represents 

the latest generation of heat recovery coke plant technology. This application supersedes our 

previous submittal which we respectfully withdraw. 

The permit application and all supporting materials are being submitted electronically. In addition, 

we are providing two complete hard copies for your use. 

We look forward to working with your agency on this project. Please feel free to contact me at 

630-824-1000 if you have any questions or need additional information. 

Sincerely, 

David Schwake 

Enc. Hard copies of application (2)
#### In the Matter of Andrew Alberti, Petitioner, v. Thomas Dickens, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the County of New York, et al., Respondents.

Article 78 proceeding unanimously dismissed. The determination sought to he reviewed is an order adjudicating the petitioner guilty of contempt of court for failure to appear before a Grand Jury as a witness in response to a subpoena served upon him. This proceeding does not lie to review such an order. (See Code Crim. Pro., § 619; CPLR 7801; Judiciary Law, § 752; *Matter of Grand Jury of County of Kings [Reardon],*278 App. Div. 206; *People*v. *Brayer,*6 A D 2d 437.) The order will bq reviewable on an appeal which the petitioner has also taken. Concur — Rabin, J. P,, Yalente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                         FRONTIER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             2000         1999         1998
                                            -------      -------      -------
<S>                                         <C>          <C>          <C>
Net Income (in thousands)                   $32,116      $28,299      $24,275
                                            =======      =======      =======

    Computation of average shares
      outstanding:

       Shares outstanding at
       beginning of year                     17,545        8,697        7,351

       Additional shares deemed
       outstanding because of
       stock dividends or splits                 --        8,759        8,383

       Shares issued pursuant
       to merger                              2,252        2,252        3,839

       Shares issued during
       the year times average
       time outstanding during
       the year                                 (62)          72           35
                                            -------      -------      -------
                                             19,735       19,780       19,608
                                            -------      -------      -------
       Average number of dilutive shares
       assumed to be outstanding                 94          163          303
                                            -------      -------      -------
       Average dilutive shares
       outstanding                           19,829       19,943       19,911
                                            =======      =======      =======
       Basic earnings per share               $1.63        $1.43        $1.24
                                            =======      =======      =======
       Diluted earnings per share             $1.62        $1.42        $1.22
                                            =======      =======      =======
</TABLE>



                                      -30-
**EXHIBIT 13.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report for the period endedMarch 31, 2005 of M (2003) plc (the“Company”) on Form 20-F as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), each of the undersigned officers of theCompany certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge:1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and 2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of the    operations of the Company.September 30, 2005     By:      /s/ JOHN JAMESON WHITE           Name: John Jameson White     Title:  Chief Executive Officer      /s/ RICHARD ANTHONY    ROBINSON           Name: Richard Anthony Robinson     Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among Detained Youth      

# Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among Detained Youth

This bulletin examines suicidal thoughts and behaviors among detained youth, using data from the Northwestern Juvenile Project, a longitudinal study of youth detained at the Cook County Juvenile Temporary Detention Center in Chicago, IL. The findings indicate that one of every 10 newly detained youth has a history of attempted suicide, meaning that detained youth may be at a greater risk of attempting suicide than young people in the general population.

http://www.ojjdp.gov/enews/14juvjust/140723.html?utm_source=FindYouthInfo&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(i)

CLARCOR INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        We hereby certify that the accompanying Report of CLARCOR Inc. on Form
10-Q for the nine months ended August 28, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CLARCOR Inc.




        /s/ Norman E. Johnson                          /s/ Bruce A. Klein
-------------------------------------            -------------------------------
          Norman E. Johnson                              Bruce A. Klein
Chairman of the Board, President and              Vice President - Finance and
       Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Financial Officer
873.109 General requirements for acquisition of health-care resources. ( a ) *Source selection authority.* Unless the head of the contracting activity (HCA) appoints another individual to serve as the Source Selection Authority (SSA), the contracting officer shall be the SSA for acquisitions of health-care resources, consisting of commercial services, or the use of medical equipment or space, utilizing the guidance contained in this part. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( b ) *Performance work statement/statement of work.* The performance work statement (PWS) or statement of work (SOW) must define the requirement and should, in most instances, include qualifications or limitations such as time limits for delivery of service, medical certification or credentialing restrictions, and small business or other socio-economic preferences. The contracting officer may include any other such terms as the contracting officer deems appropriate for each specific acquisition. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( c ) *Documentation.* Without regard to FAR 13.106-3(b), 13.501(b), or 15.406-3, the contract file must include— ( 1 ) A brief written description of the procedures used in awarding the contract;
( 2 ) A written determination that the health-care resources being procured are not otherwise feasibly available or that utilization of such health-care resources is necessary to meet mission requirements;
( 3 ) Documentation of market research and the results of such research;
( 4 ) The number of offers received; and
( 5 ) An explanation, tailored to the size and complexity of the acquisition, of the basis for the contract award decision. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( d ) *Time for receipt of quotations or offers.* ( 1 ) Without regard to FAR 5.203, contracting officers shall set a reasonable time for receipt of quotations or proposals in the solicitations.
( 2 ) Without regard to FAR 15.208 or 52.212-1(f), quotations or proposals received after the time set forth in an RFQ or request for proposals (RFP) may be considered at the discretion of the contracting officer if determined to be in the best interest of the Government. Contracting officers must document the rationale for accepting quotations or proposals received after the time specified in the RFQ or RFP. This paragraph (d)(2) shall not apply to RFQs or RFPs if alternative evaluation techniques described in 873.111(d)(1)(ii) are used. This paragraph (d)(2) does not apply to invitations for bid (IFBs). (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( e ) *Cancellation of procurements.* Any acquisition may be canceled by the contracting officer at any time during the acquisition process if cancellation is determined to be in the best interest of the Government and a memorandum for the record in included in the solicitation file explaining the reasons for the cancellation. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
Appendix 5
#### Marisol Mancera LUNA, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-71187.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 5, 2008.

Filed June 9, 2008.

Stephen V. Masterson, David G. Meyer, Stephanie A. Stroup, Howrey Simon Arnold *&*White, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Marisol Mancera Luna pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, R. Alexander Goring, OIL, Nairi M. Simonian, Jeffrey J. Bernstein, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL *

Marisol Mancera Luna filed this timely petition for review after the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed the Im*757migration Judge’s (IJ) denial of her application for cancellation of removal. The facts are known to the parties and will not be repeated here. We dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction.

We may review a final order of removal only if “the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1). An alien’s failure to raise an issue to the BIA generally constitutes failure to exhaust, depriving this court of jurisdiction to consider the issue. *Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004). An alien “cannot satisfy the exhaustion requirement by making a general challenge to the IJ’s decision, but, rather, must specify which issues form the basis of the appeal.” *Zara v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 927, 930 (9th Cir.2004). However, claims may be exhausted even if the alien does not use precise legal language so long as the alien provides the BIA with “sufficient reason to be aware of, and opportunity to review” her claim. *Ladha v. INS,*215 F.3d 889, 901 n. 13 (9th Cir.2000). Additionally, for the purposes of exhaustion, pro se petitions are held to a more lenient standard than counseled petitions. *See Estelle v. Gamble,*429 U.S. 97, 106, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976).

Even liberally construing Luna’s notice of appeal and BIA brief, she did not raise the due process claims she presents in her petition for review. *See Barron,*358 F.3d at 676; *Zara,*383 F.3d at 930. Neither her notice of appeal nor her BIA brief mention the alleged abuse she and her sister suffered at the hands of their father nor claim that the IJ erred by failing to consider such abuse when making the hardship determination. Likewise, she never mentioned the psychologist’s report she now claims the IJ erred in refusing to consider. Rather, the focus of Luna’s BIA appeal was her contention that the IJ erred in not considering her allegations of domestic abuse. Luna’s claims are therefore unexhausted and we lack jurisdiction to consider them. *See Barron,*358 F.3d at 678.

The petition for review is DISMISSED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Vincenzo Zavaglia, Appellant, v. H. R. H. Construction Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 12, 1966 and September 29, 1966, respectively, affirmed, without costs. Special Term was not compelled to credit appellant’s account *of*his alleged accident about which issue the papers before the court tended *to*show that respondent did not have knowledge (see *De France*v. *Oestrike,*8 A D 2d 735). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Babin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
#### 9904.402-40 Fundamental requirement.

All costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, are either direct costs only or indirect costs only with respect to final cost objectives. No final cost objective shall have allocated to it as an indirect cost any cost, if other costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, have been included as a direct cost of that or any other final cost objective. Further, no final cost objective shall have allocated to it as a direct cost any cost, if other costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, have been included in any indirect cost pool to be allocated to that or any other final cost objective.
§ 1.319 Authority of the ALJ. ( a ) The ALJ shall conduct a fair and impartial hearing, avoid delay, maintain order, and assure that a record of the proceedings is made.
( b ) The ALJ may: ( 1 ) Set and change the date, time, and place of the hearing upon reasonable notice to the parties;
( 2 ) Continue or recess the hearing in whole or part for a reasonable period of time;
( 3 ) Hold conferences to identify or simplify the issues, or to consider other matters that may aid in the expeditious disposition of the proceeding;
( 4 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 5 ) Issue subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents at depositions or at hearings;
( 6 ) Rule on motions and other procedural matters;
( 7 ) Regulate the scope and timing of discovery;
( 8 ) Regulate the course of the hearing and the conduct of attorneys and parties;
( 9 ) Examine witnesses;
( 10 ) Receive, rule on, exclude, or limit evidence;
( 11 ) Upon motion of a party take official notice of facts;
( 12 ) Upon motion of a party, decide cases, in whole or in part, by summary judgment where there is no disputed issue of material fact;
( 13 ) Conduct any conference, argument, or hearing on motions in person or by telephone; and
( 14 ) Exercise such other authority as is necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the ALJ under this subpart.
( c ) The ALJ does not have the authority to decide upon the validity of Federal statutes, regulations, or legal opinions.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Opportunity for All: Supporting Asian American and Pacific Islander Families      

# Opportunity for All: Supporting Asian American and Pacific Islander Families

This document outlines how President Obama’s budget for fiscal year 2015 takes steps to support and create opportunities for Asian American and Pacific Islander families (PDF, 8 pages) in education, employment, health care, and economic growth. 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2015/assets/fact_sheets/supporting-asian-american-and-pacific-islander-families.pdf?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
#### 853.236 Construction and architect-engineer contracts.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. AD21-10-000]

Take notice that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) will convene a Commissioner-led technical conference in the above-referenced proceeding on Tuesday March 23, 2021 from approximately 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and Wednesday March 24, 2021 from approximately 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Eastern time. The conference will be held remotely. The Commission will issue a supplemental notice providing the agenda for the technical conference.

                    The conference will be open for the public to attend remotely. There is no fee for attendance. Information on this event will be posted on the Calendar of Events on the Commission's website,                     *www.ferc.gov,*                     prior to the event.                

The conference will be transcribed. Transcripts will be available for a fee from Ace Reporting (202-347-3700).

                    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please send an email to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free 1-866-208-3372 (voice) or 202-208-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.                

                    For more information about this technical conference, please contact David Rosner at                     *david.rosner@ferc.gov*                     or Emma Nicholson at                     *emma.nicholson@ferc.gov.*                     For information related to logistics, please contact Sarah McKinley at                     *sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov*                     or (202) 502-8368.                

Dated: February 18, 2021.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2021-03807 Filed 2-23-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Tri-Valley Corporation. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   | November 17, 2011                                                                 |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:               | /s/ Maston N. Cunningham                                                          |
|              | Maston N. Cunningham, President and Chief Executive OfficerTri-Valley Corporation |