alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
808.405-70 Set-aside procedures for VA and GSA Federal Supply Schedules. To satisfy VA legislative requirements, contracting officers shall use the supplemental ordering procedures of this section when establishing a BPA or placing an order for supplies or services under this subpart as follows: ( a ) *When market research supports set-asides.* Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8127, contracting activities shall set-aside BPAs and orders for VIP-listed SDVOSBs or VOSBs when, based on research, the contracting officer has a reasonable expectation that two or more small business concerns owned and controlled by Veterans or owned and controlled by Veterans with service-connected disabilities will submit offers and that award can be made at a fair and reasonable price that offers best value to the United States. When the VA Rule of Two (see 802.101) is met: ( 1 ) The set-aside requirements as provided in 819.7006 and 819.7007 are mandatory.
( 2 ) The requirements in FAR 8.405-1, 8.405-2, and 8.405-3 apply, except only quotes received from verified (*i.e.,* VIP-listed) and eligible SDVOSBs or VOSBs will be considered.
( 3 ) The eligibility requirements of 819.7003, 819.7006, and 819.7007 apply, including the requirement for offerors to be VIP-listed at the time they submit offers/quotes as well as at the time awards are made.
( 4 ) The contracting officer shall notify potential offerors of the unique VA verification requirements by including in the solicitation the applicable set-aside clause prescribed at 819.7011.
( b ) *When market research does not support set-asides.* Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8128 and to the extent that market research does not support an SDVOSB or VOSB set-aside in either FSS or the open market, the contracting activity shall give priority in the award of orders placed under this part to VIP-listed SDVOSBs/VOSBs through the use of evaluation preferences giving priority to SDVOSBs first, then to a lesser extent VOSBs, and finally to any firm that proposes to use SDVOSBs/VOSBs as subcontractors. Contracting officers must use the clause prescribed in 808.405-570(b).
( c ) *SDVOSB/VOSB eligibility requirements.* The SDVOSB and VOSB eligibility requirements in 819.7003 apply, including current SDVOSB and VOSB VIP-listed status at the time of submission of offer/quote and at time of award. The offeror must also represent that it meets the small business size standard for the assigned North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code as well as other small business requirements (including completing the certification found in 852.219-75 or 852.219-76.
#### 970.0407-1-2 Access to and ownership of records.

Contracting officers may agree to contractor ownership of certain categories of records designated in the instruction contained in paragraph (b) of the clause at 970.5204-3, Access to and Ownership of Records, provided the records do not fall within a DOE Privacy Act system of record and the Government's rights to inspect, copy, and audit these records are not limited. These rights must be retained by the Government in order to carry out the Department's statutory responsibilities required by the Atomic Energy Act and other statutes for oversight of its contractors, including compliance with the Department's health, safety and reporting the Privacy Act requirements, and protection of the public interest.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36371, July 22, 2009; 79 FR 56285, Sept. 19, 2014]
909.406-70 Requests for reconsideration of debarment. ( a ) At any time during a period of debarment, a respondent may submit to the Debarring or Suspending Official a written request for reconsideration of the scope, duration, or effects of the suspension/debarment action because of new information or changed circumstances, as discussed at 48 CFR 9.406-4(c).
( b ) In reviewing a request for reconsideration, the Debarring or Suspending Official may, in his or her discretion, utilize any of the procedures (meeting and fact-finding) set forth in 909.406-3 and 909.407-3. The Debarring or Suspending Official's final disposition of the reconsideration request shall be in writing and shall set forth the reasons why the request has been granted or denied. A notice transmitting a copy of the disposition of the request for reconsideration shall be sent to the respondent.
[61 FR 39857, July 31, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 36362, July 22, 2009; 76 FR 7692, Feb. 11, 2011]
#### Frances Hotkins et al., Appellants-Respondents, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Respondents, and Marek Olejniczak, Respondent-Appellant.

[777 NYS2d 469]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered on or about July 25, 2003, which granted the motion of the defendants New York City Transit Authority, *475Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and Henry Amo (the Transit defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, and denied defendant Olejniczak’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The uncontradicted evidence that defendant Olejniczak’s vehicle pulled in front of the Transit defendants’ bus abruptly and without signaling, leaving a space of only three feet between the vehicles, and then stopped, forcing defendant bus driver to brake immediately to avoid a collision, established that the bus driver acted reasonably in an emergency situation not of his making *(see Caristo v Sanzone,*96 NY2d 172, 174 [2001]; *Nieves v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*31 AD2d 359, 360-361 [1969], *lv denied*24 NY2d 741 [1969]), and warranted the denial of defendant Olejniczak’s cross motion for summary judgment. Concur—Nardelli, J.E, Lerner, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
#### In the Matter of John Cantwell, Petitioner, v. Myles J. Lane et al., Respondents. In the Matter of William F. Rice, Jr., Petitioner, v. Myles J. Lane et al., Respondents.

Motions by respondents made in separate proceedings pursuant to section 132 of the Civil Practice Act to vacate two orders granted ex parte by Special Term directing them to show cause why subpranas duces tecum issued by the Temporary State Commission of Investigation of the State of New York should not be quashed and staying the operative effect of the process until the determination of the motions. The order dated April 25 contained the additional pervasive provision which restrained “any action” by the commission “in regard to the records of purchases of the County ” for the same period. Motion in the proceeding instituted by petitioner Cantwell is denied, without costs. Motion in the proceeding instituted by petitioner Rice is granted to the extent of striking the provisions of the third decretal paragraph of the order granted therein and otherwise denied, without costs. If the motions have not been rendered academic by a decision of Special Term before the adjourned date of this term, June 12, 1962, they may be renewed by respondents, if so advised, on that date wihout oral argument on the papers now before us. Present — Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 37 (Friday, February 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 11762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP21-503-000.
    Applicants: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
    Description: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation submits tariff 
filing per 154.203: Fuel Tracker Per GT&C Section 41 to be effective 4/
1/2021 under RP21-503.
    Filed Date: 02/19/2021.
    Accession Number: 20210219-5077.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 3/3/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-504-000.
    Applicants: Empire Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Empire Pipeline, Inc. submits tariff filing per 
154.203: Empire Fuel Tracker per GT&C 23.6 to be effective 4/1/2021 
under RP21-504.
    Filed Date: 02/19/2021.
    Accession Number: 20210219-5081.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 3/3/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: February 22, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-04026 Filed 2-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### 9904.413-61 Interpretation. [Reserved]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Chyron Corporation, a New York corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:
May 12, 2009 
/s/ Michael Wellesley-Wesley   
Michael Wellesley-Wesley   
President and    
Principal Executive Officer        
Dated:
May 12, 2009 
/s/ Jerry Kieliszak   
Jerry Kieliszak   
Senior Vice President and   
Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10357 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10357

   To require a report on former Federal employees advising foreign 
                              governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2024

 Mr. Castro of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require a report on former Federal employees advising foreign 
                              governments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency in Former Federal 
Employees Advising Foreign Governments Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON FORMER FEDERAL EMPLOYEES ADVISING FOREIGN 
              GOVERNMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 3 years, the 
Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, the 
Select Committee on Intelligence, the Committee on Homeland Security 
and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on Armed Services of the 
Senate, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the 
Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and the Committee on Armed 
Services of the House of Representatives a report that identifies 
former United States Government senior officials who have been approved 
by the Secretary to advise foreign governments.
    (b) Form.--The report required under subsection (a) shall be 
submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
                                 <all>
```
#### 970.5232-1 Reduction or suspension of advance, partial, or progress payments upon finding of substantial evidence of fraud.

As prescribed in 970.3200-1-1, insert the following clause:

# Reduction or Suspension of Advance, Partial, or Progress Payments (DEC 2000)

(a) The Contracting Officer may reduce or suspend further advance, partial, or progress payments to the Contractor upon a written determination by the Senior Procurement Executive that substantial evidence exists that the Contractor's request for advance, partial, or progress payment is based on fraud.

(b) The Contractor shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond in writing.

(End of clause)

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36375, 36378, 36380, July 22, 2009]
831.7001-3 Books, supplies, and equipment required to be personally owned. ( a ) *Reimbursement for books, supplies, and equipment.* VA will provide reimbursement for books, equipment, or other supplies of the same variety, quality, or amount that all students taking the same course or courses are customarily required to own personally. VA will provide reimbursement for items that the institution does not specifically require for pursuit of the course if VA determines that such items are needed because of the demands of the course, general possession by other students, and the disadvantage imposed on a Veteran student by not having the item.
( b ) *Partial payment agreements.* Agreements in which VA would pay the institution a partial payment with the remainder to be paid by the Veteran student are not authorized.
( c ) *Thesis expenses.* The institution's costs in connection with a Veteran student's thesis are considered supplies and are therefore authorized for reimbursement if the Veteran student's committee chairman, major professor, department head, or appropriate dean certifies that the thesis is a course requirement and the expenses are required to complete the thesis. These expenses may include research expenses, typing, printing, microfilming, or otherwise reproducing the required number of copies.
( d ) *Reimbursement for books, supplies, and equipment.* Books, supplies, and equipment that the institution purchases specifically for trainees will be reimbursed at the net cost to the institution. The VA shall reimburse the institution for books, supplies, and equipment when these items are— ( 1 ) Issued to students from its own bookstore or supply store;
( 2 ) Issued to students from retail stores or other non-institutionally owned establishments not owned by the contractor/institution but arranged or designated by them in cooperation with VA; or
( 3 ) Rented or leased books, supplies and equipment and are issued to students for survey classes when it is customary that students are not required to own the books.
( e ) *Handling charges.* VA shall reimburse the institution for any handling charges not to exceed more than 10 percent of the allowable charge for the books, equipment or other supplies unless— ( 1 ) The tuition covers the charges for supplies or rentals or a stipulated fee is assessed to all students; or
( 2 ) The handling charge is for Government-owned books that the contractor procures from the Library of Congress.
#### 904.7200 Purpose.

It is the policy of the Department of Energy to provide to the public and the news media, accurate and timely unclassified information on Departmental policies, programs, and activities. The Department's contractors share the responsibility for releasing unclassified information related to efforts under their contracts and must coordinate the release of unclassified information with the cognizant contracting officer and appropriate DOE Public Affairs personnel.
#### Daniel J. Sullivan et al., Appellants, v Lawrence Katz, Respondent.

[775 NYS2d 593]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), entered January 31, 2003, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendant and against them, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the evidence adduced at trial did not warrant instructing the jury under PJI3d 2:71 (2004 Supp) as to concurrent causes *(see Getlin v St. Vincent's Hosp. & Med. Ctr. of N.Y.,*117 AD2d 707, 708 [1986]).

The jury verdict was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence *(see McKnight v LaGuardia Hosp.,*263 AD2d 500, 501 [1999]). Altman, J.P., Smith, S. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           What are Districts' Written Policies Regarding Student Substance-Related Incidents?      

# What are Districts' Written Policies Regarding Student Substance-Related Incidents?

A  research brief, “What are Districts’ Written Policies Regarding Student Substance-Related Incidents?” presents the findings from a study commissioned by the Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences. The study examined substance-related policies for the 100 largest school districts in the country

http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20124022/
#### Zoe C. Wagner v. Heinz Wagner.

Motion for resettlement denied. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.
970.3270 Standard financial management clauses. ( a ) The following DEAR and FAR clauses are standard financial management clauses. The contracting officer shall insert them in all management and operating contracts: ( 1 ) *970.5232-2, Payments and Advances.* ( i ) The contracting officer shall insert the basic clause with its Alternate I if a separate fixed-fee is provided for a separate item of work.
( ii ) The contracting officer shall insert the basic clause with its Alternate II when total available fee provisions in the basic clause are used.
( iii ) The contracting officer shall insert the basic clause with its Alternate III in management and operating contracts with integrated accounting systems.
( iv ) The contracting officer shall insert the basic clause with its Alternate IV in management and operating contracts without integrated accounting systems.
( 2 ) *970.5232-3, Accounts, records, and inspection.* If the contract includes the clause at 48 CFR 52.215-11, Price Reduction for Defective Cost or Pricing Data—Modifications, the contracting officer shall use the clause with its Alternate I.
( 3 ) *970.5232-4, Obligation of funds.* The contracting officer may use the clause with its Alternate I in contracts which, expressly or otherwise, provide a contractual basis for equivalent controls in a separate clause.
( 4 ) 970.5203-1, Management controls.
( 5 ) 970.5232-5, Liability with respect to Cost Accounting Standards.
( 6 ) 970.5232-6, Strategic Partnership Projects funding authorization.
( 7 ) 48 CFR 52.230-2, Cost Accounting Standards.
( 8 ) 48 CFR 52.230-6, Administration of Cost Accounting Standards.
( b ) The following DEAR clauses are standard financial management clauses. The contracting officer shall insert them in all management and operating contracts with integrated accounting systems: ( 1 ) 970.5232-7, Financial management system.
( 2 ) 970.5232-8, Integrated accounting.
( c ) Any deviations from the standard financial management clauses specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section require the approval of the Head of the Contracting Activity and the written concurrence of the Department's Chief Financial Officer.
[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 29081, May 24, 2007; 74 FR 36373, July 22, 2009; 80 FR 15519, Mar. 24, 2015]
# GE Power & Water



# New Source Performance

Standards: EGUs

Background

GE Power & Water offers a diverse set of solutions in virtually every segment of the

electric generation sector, including natural gas, cleaner coal, renewables, and

nuclear. EPA’s re­proposal of the GHG NSPS rule for new facilities will have important

impacts on future energy development in the United States, and by way of example,

other markets abroad.



# Recommendations

Regulatory certainty is critical for maintaining a diverse, secure energy mix

∗ A well­crafted proposal could help create certainty for investors, developers and

utilities, leading to cleaner electric generation while protecting the environment.

∗ EPA’s decisions on the current proposal will have important implications in both

the near and long­term, including the upcoming rulemaking on existing sources.

∗ EPA should split the standard for CO2 emissions into separate categories by fuel.

Each standard must be set right

∗ EPA’s standard for NGCC units should be achievable over the full range of

operating conditions. EPA should therefore propose a standard of 1,100 lbs CO2/

MWh.

∗ Stricter standards do not mean better performance, greater efficiency or fewer

emissions. Too low a standard can have unintended consequences by limiting

flexible operation of NGCC plants, making it more difficult to integrate renewables

on the grid.

∗ EPA must factor in the actual performance characteristics of plants once installed

and put into operation.

EPA should maintain a sharp focus on simple cycle applications

∗ Simple cycle turbines are unlikely to achieve the same standards as combined

cycle plants. These turbines encounter frequent startups, shutdowns, and

variable loads.

∗ Simple cycle turbines and combined cycle units are not interchangeable with

each other, and perform very different roles on the grid. 

## GE Power & Water

Revenue (2012) $28B

GE R&D Funding (2012) >$5.7B

Employees >40,000

Locations >700



## Power Generation Services

Revenue (2012) $8B

Headquarters Atlanta

Employees >7,600

Countries >100

Assets monitored >1,400

Operating data (hours) >93M



# imagination at work