alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09760

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

09760\09760_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 09760\09760_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09760\09760_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09760\09760_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09760\Certification Statement_09760.pdf Plant certification statement

09760\Supporting Documentation\09760 Submittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09760\Supporting Documentation\09760_A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09760\Supporting Documentation\09760_A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09760\09760_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09760\09760_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### OLENICK, Appellant, v. HABER et al., R spondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Ter)

February 27, 1906.)

Appeal from Munieip Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth Distric Action by Alfred Oleniek against Morrsi Hab and others. From a judgment for defendant plaintiff appeals.

Reversed.

Schleimer Schleimer (Max Schleimer, of counsel), for a pellant.

Henry J. Block, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

There seems to have be* sufficient testimony introduced without obje *1143on, tending to show that the gas ranges, the abject of this action, were the property of le Northern Union Gas Company at the time aey were agreed to be conveyed to the plaintiff y the defendants, which agreement was after-rards consummated. Upon the question of merer of the contract made between the parties i the subsequent warranty deed given by the efendant, this court, in the case of Wynne . Friedman (Dec. Term) 96 N. Y. Supp. 838, eld upon a similar state of facts that no merger iok place, and a judgment for the value of be ranges was affirmed. Judgment reversed, nd new trial ordered, with costs to appellant o abide the event.
619.000 Scope of part. ( b ) It is the Department's policy to provide maximum opportunities for U.S. small businesses to participate in the acquisition process. DOS contracts that are awarded domestically for performance overseas shall be subject to the Small Business Act as a matter of policy. Contracts that are both awarded and performed overseas should comply on a voluntary basis.
[71 FR 34839, June 16, 2006]
#### Cirino Caiola et al., Plaintiffs, v Allcity Insurance Company, Defendant. Solomon Abrahams, Nonparty Appellant. (Matter No. 1.) In the Matter of Parkside Limited Liability Company. Solomon Abrahams, Nonparty Appellant. (Matter No. 2.)

[776 NYS2d 504]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and an unrelated proceeding pursuant to Limited Liability Company Law § 702 for the judicial dissolution of a limited liability company, Solomon Abrahams, former attorney for the plaintiff in Matter No. 1 and former attorney for a respondent in Matter No. 2, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered July 22, 2003, which denied his motion, inter alia, to dismiss a criminal contempt proceeding against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant contends that the Supreme Court did not have the power to commence the criminal contempt proceeding against him sua sponte. However, having unsuccessfully litigated this issue in a prior proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see *Matter of Abrahams v DiBlasi,*293 AD2d 530 [2002]), the appellant is collaterally estopped from making this argument (see *Goldman Plumbing & Heating Corp. v Nesbit,*244 App Div 311 [1935]), which, in any event, is without merit *(cf.*Judiciary Law § 2-b [3]; *De Lancey v Piepgras,*141 NY 88 [1894]; *Wehringer v Brannigan,*232 AD2d 206 [1996]).

*558Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to recuse itself after commencing the criminal contempt proceeding *(see Skripek v Skripek,*239 AD2d 488 [1997]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.
#### 970.2672-1 Policy.

Consistent with the objectives of section 3161 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993, 42 U.S.C. 7274h, in instances where the Department of Energy has determined that a change in work force at a DOE Defense Nuclear Facility is necessary, DOE contractors and subcontractors at DOE Defense Nuclear Facilities shall accomplish work force restructuring or displacement so as to mitigate social and economic impacts and in a manner consistent with any DOE work force restructuring plan in effect for the facility or site. In all cases, mitigation shall include the requirement for hiring preferences for employees whose positions have been terminated (except for termination for cause) as a result of changes to the work force at the facility due to restructuring accomplished under the requirements of section 3161. Where applicable, contractors may take additional actions to mitigate consistent with the Department's Workforce Restructuring Plan for the facility or site.
#### 9.603 Policy.

The Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements; *provided,* the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in an offer or, for arrangements entered into after submission of an offer, before the arrangement becomes effective. The Government will not normally require or encourage the dissolution of contractor team arrangements.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of BERT Logic Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert G. Pico, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and


          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


November 3, 2003                      /s/ Robert G. Pico
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Robert G. Pico
                                      Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.4


 


 






     


     


    

 





 






    	 	2	 



     


    

 





 






    	 	3	 



     


    

 





 






    	 	4	 



     


    

 





 






    	 	5	 



     


    

 





 






    	 	6	 



     


    

 





 


 


7
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Tri-Valley Corporation. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:   | November 17, 2011                                                       |   |
|-------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| By:               | /s/ Gregory L. Billinger                                                     |   |
|              | Gregory L. Billinger , Interim Chief Financial OfficerTri-Valley Corporation |   |
945.102-70 Reporting of contractor-held property. The Head of the Contracting Activity may be required to report the following information to the Personal Property Policy Division, within the Headquarters procurement organization: ( a ) Name and address of each contractor with DOE personal property in their possession, or in the possession of their subcontractors (do not include grantees, cooperative agreements, interagency agreements, or agreements with state or local governments).
( b ) Contract number of each DOE contract with Government personal property.
( c ) Date contractor's property management system was approved and by whom (DOE office, Defense Contract Management Command, or the Office of Naval Research).
( d ) Date of most current appraisal of contractor's property management system, who conducted the appraisal, and status of the system (satisfactory or unsatisfactory).
( e ) Total acquisition value of DOE personal property for each DOE contract administered by the contracting activity.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent 

 v. 

KARIM HUSEIN WRIGHT, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 182 MM 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2015, in response to the Petition for Leave 

to File Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc, this matter is REMANDED to 

the common pleas court for appointment of new counsel within 30 days of this order. 

Newly-appointed counsel is DIRECTED to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 

60 days of appointment. 

Justice Stevens notes his dissent and would deny the Petition for Leave to file a 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 15, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 15, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0227. KELLY MICHELLE SATCHER et al. v. HILDA DAVIS CAROLYN 

CLARK, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF LARRY HANES CLARK.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

E15061
970.2702-3 Patent indemnity. ( a ) Contracting officers must use the clause at 970.5227-6, Patent Indemnity—Subcontracts to assure that subcontracts appropriately address patent indemnity.
( b ) Normally, the clause at 48 CFR 52.227-3 would not be appropriate for an M&O contract; however, if there is a question, such as when the mission of the contractor involves production, the contracting officer must consult with local patent counsel and use the clause where appropriate.
2008 PM2.5Annual Design Values for New Jersey MonitorsNJ Monitor State ID EPA AQS CodePM2.5Annual Design Value(μg/m3)Union F02 34 039 0004 13.6Camden F04 34 007 0003 13.1Middlesex F06 34 023 0006 11.3Hudson F07 34 017 1002 12.9Hudson F08 34 017 2002 14.1Passaic F09 34 031 0005 12.3Essex F10 34 013 0015 13.0Bergen F11 34 003 0003 12.2Union F12 34 039 0006 12.6Camden F13 34 007 1007 12.7Mercer F14 34 021 0008 11.9Morris F15 34 027 3001 9.4Mercer F16 34 021 8001 10.1Ocean F17 34 029 2002 10.2Morris F18 34 027 0004 10.3Warren F19 34 041 0006 11.8Glouster F20 34 015 5001 11.7Union F22 34 039 2003 12.3Atlantic F23 34 001 1006 11.1These values are not yet in AQS but are considered final.
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Andrx Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endedDecember 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),we, Thomas P. Rice, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andJohn M. Hanson, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Thomas P. Rice       Thomas P. Rice     Chief Executive Officer      /s/ John M. Hanson       John M. Hanson     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 9, 2005
138
#### 52.247-42 C.i.f. Destination.

As prescribed in 47.303-14(c), insert the following clause in solicitations and contracts when the delivery term is c.i.f. destination:

# C.i.f. Destination (APR 1984)

(a) The term *c.i.f. destination,* as used in this clause, means free of expense to the Government delivered on board the ocean vessel to the specified point of destination, with the cost of transportation and marine insurance paid by the Contractor.

(b) The Contractor shall—

(1)(i) Pack and mark the shipment to comply with contract specifications; or

(ii) In the absence of specifications, prepare the shipment for ocean transportation in conformance with carrier requirements;

(2)(i) Deliver the shipment in good order and condition; and

(ii) Pay and bear all applicable charges to the point of destination specified in the contract, including transportation costs and export taxes or other fees or charges levied because of exportation;

(3) Obtain and dispatch promptly to the Government clean on-board ocean bills of lading to the specified point of destination;

(4) Be responsible for any loss of and/or damage to the goods occurring before delivery;

(5) At the Government's request and expense, provide certificates of origin, consular invoices, or any other documents issued in the country of origin or of shipment, or both, that may be required for importation into the country of destination; and

(6) Obtain and dispatch to the Government an insurance policy or certificate providing the amount and extent of marine insurance coverage specified in the contract or agreed upon by the Government Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)
#### 732.403 Applicability.

References to nonprofit contracts with nonprofit educational or research institutions for experimental, research and development work include nonprofit contracts with nonprofit institutions for: (a) technical assistance services provided to or for another country or countries, and (b) projects which concern studies, demonstrations and similar activities related to economic growth or the solution of social problems of developing countries.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Electronic Sensor Technology,  Inc. Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Francis Chang,  Vice
President,  Finance and Administration,  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
         respects  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
         Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906,  another
document authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Electronic  Sensor Technology Inc.
and will be retained by Electronic  Sensor  Technology Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





                                  /s/ Francis Chang
                                  -------------------------------------------
                                   Francis Chang
                                   Vice President, Finance and Administration
                                  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit31.a**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,James E. Rogers, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cinergy Corp., TheCincinnati Gas & Electric Company, PSI Energy, Inc., and The Union Light,Heat and Power Company;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrants as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrants’ other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrants,including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants’disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrants’ internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrants’ most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants’ fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrants’ internal control over financialreporting; and

5.The registrants’ other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrants’ auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants’ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:November 5, 2004

 

/s/  James E. Rogers

     James E. RogersChief Executive Officer

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          17,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    114,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,975
<PP&E>                                          73,462
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,857
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,303
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,169
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,587
<SALES>                                         63,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,893
<CGS>                                           59,020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (11,965)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,645)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,320)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,320)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.38)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10249 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10249

To amend the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness 
       Act of 1992 to adjust the affordable housing allocations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 2024

 Mrs. Beatty introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness 
       Act of 1992 to adjust the affordable housing allocations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Generating Resources and 
Opportunities Within Affordable Housing Act'' or the ``GROW Affordable 
Housing Act''.

SEC. 2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLOCATIONS.

    Section 1337(a) of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety 
and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4567(a)) is amended by striking 
``4.2 basis points'' each place such term appears and inserting ``10 
basis points''.
                                 <all>
```
#### 970.0808-00 Scope.

This section prescribes the Department's policy concerning duplicating or printing services which may be required in the performance of management and operating contracts.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000. Redesignated at 74 FR 36371, July 22, 2009]