Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 / Notices 11227 

2See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘HotRolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil: Request for 

Administrative Review of Antidumping Duty 

Order,’’ dated October 30, 2020. 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

78990 (December 8, 2020). 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘HotRolled Steel Flat Products from Brazil: Withdrawal 

of Request for Administrative Review of 

Antidumping Duty Order,’’ dated February 2, 2021. 

1See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the 

Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the 

United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the 

Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 

2016) (Order); See also Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from Turkey: Notice of Court Decision Not 

in Harmony with the Amended Final Determination 

in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation; Notice of 

Amended Final Determination, Amended 

Antidumping Duty Order, Notice of Revocation of 

Antidumping Duty Order in Part; and 

Discontinuation of the 2017–18 and 2018–19 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, in Part, 

85 FR 29399 (May 15, 2020) (Timken Notice). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 

67712 (December 11, 2019) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection 

Memorandum for Administrative Review of 

Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Turkey; 

2018–2019,’’ dated May 15, 2020. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Continued 

LLC (collectively, the Domestic 

Interested Parties) for the following 

producers/exporters: Aperam Inox 

America Do Sul S.A.; Arcelormittal 

Brasil S.A.; Companhia Siderugica Do 

Pece ́m (CSP); Gerdau Acominas S.A.; 

Gerdau Summit Acos Fundidos e 

Forjados S.A.; La ́mina Desplegada S.A. 

de C.V.; MAHLE Metal Leve S.A.; NVent 

do Brasil Eletrometalurgica Ltda.; 

Prensas Schuler S.A.; Signode Brasileira 

Ltda.; Ternium Brasil Ltda.; and Usinas 

Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. 

(Usiminas).2

On December 8, 2020, pursuant to this 

request and in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce published a 

notice initiating an administrative 

review of the AD order on hot-rolled 

steel flat products from Brazil with 

respect to the 12 requested companies.3

On February 2, 2021, the Domestic 

Interested Parties withdrew their 

request for an administrative review 

with respect to all of the companies for 

which it had requested a review.4

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party or parties that 

requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the 

publication date of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. As 

noted above, the Domestic Interested 

Parties withdrew their request for 

review of all companies within 90 days 

of the publication date of the notice of 

initiation. No other parties requested an 

administrative review of the order. 

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this 

review in its entirety. 

Assessment 

Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of hot-rolled steel flat products 

from Brazil during the POR. 

Antidumping duties shall be assessed at 

rates equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to 

issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.42(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of AD 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of AD 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled AD duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to all parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation, which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issues and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: February 18, 2021. 

James Maeder, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2021–03779 Filed 2–23–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–826] 

Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

From the Republic of Turkey: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily determines 

that seven companies, including the 

sole mandatory respondent, Habas Sinai 

ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S. 

(Habas), a producer and exporter of 

certain hot-rolled steel flat products 

(hot-rolled steel) from the Republic of 

Turkey (Turkey), sold subject 

merchandise in the United States at 

prices below normal value during the 

period of review (POR) October 1, 2018, 

through September 30, 2019. In 

addition, Commerce preliminarily 

determines that six exporters had no 

shipments during the POR. Lastly, on 

May 15, 2020, Commerce discontinued 

the review initiated for Colakoglu 

Metalurji, A.S., and Colakoglu Dis 

Ticaret A.S. We invite all interested 

parties to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable February 24, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lingjun Wang, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2316. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on hot-rolled 

steel from Turkey,1 in accordance with 

section 751(a)(1)(B) of Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). On 

December 11, 2019, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated this 

administrative review of the Order 

covering thirteen producers and/or 

exporters of the subject merchandise.2

On May 15, 2020, Commerce selected 

Habas as the sole mandatory 

respondent.3

On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled 

all deadlines in administrative reviews 

by 50 days.4 Subsequently, on July 21, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
11228 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 / Notices 

Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational 

Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 

2020. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from the Republic of Turkey: 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2019; Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 

Results,’’ dated October 2, 2020. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments: Certain Hot-Rolled 

Steel Flat Products from Turkey; 2018–2019,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

8 Id.; see also Order. 

9 In the underlying investigation, Commerce 

collapsed Eregrli Demir ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S. 

and Iskenderun Iron & Steel Works Co. 

(collectively, Erdemir Group) as a single entity. See 

Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 

Republic of Turkey: Affirmative Preliminary 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 15231 

(March 22, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum at 6, unchanged in Certain 

Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of 

Turkey: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 81 FR 53428 (August 12, 2016). 

10 In Commerce’s Initiation Notice, this company 

was referred to as Seametal San ve Dis Tic. The two 

names refer to the same company. 

11See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4. 

12See, e.g., Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of 

Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2017–2018, 84 FR 

34863 (July 19, 2019), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 4. 

13See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Turkey: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony 

with the Amended Final Determination in the LessThan-Fair-Value Investigation; Notice of Amended 

Final Determination, Amended Antidumping Duty 

Order, Notice of Revocation of Antidumping Duty 

Order in Part; and Discontinuation of the 2017–18 

and 2018–19 Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews, in Part, 85 FR 29399 (May 15, 2020). 

14This rate is based on the rates for the 

respondents that were selected for individual 

review, excluding rates that are zero, de minimis, 

or based entirely on facts available. See section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. See Memorandum, ‘‘Final 

Results of the Antidumping Administrative Review 

of Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel 

Pipes and Tubes from the Republic of Korea: 

Calculation of the Cash Deposit Rate for NonReviewed Companies,’’ dated July 6, 2020. 

2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in 

administrative reviews by an additional 

60 days.5 On October 2, 2020, we 

postponed the preliminary results of 

this review until February 17, 2021.6

For a detailed description of the events 

that followed the initiation of this 

review, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, dated concurrently with 

these preliminary results and hereby 

adopted by this notice.7

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is certain hot-rolled steel flat 

products. For a complete description of 

the scope of the Order, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.8

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act. Export prices are calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act 

and normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying these 

preliminary results, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is attached as an 

Appendix to this notice. 

The Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/. The signed and electronic versions 

of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

Six producers and/or exporters 

properly filed a certification reporting 

that they made no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR: (1) Agir 

Haddecilik A.S. (Agir); (2) Eregli Demir 

ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S. and (3) 

Iskenderun Iron & Steel Works Ltd. (a/ 

k/a/Iskenderun Demir ve Celik A.S.) 

(collectively, Erdemir Group); 9 (4) Gazi 

Metal Mamulleri Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. 

(Gazi); (5) Seametal Sanayi ve Dis 

Ticaret Limited Sirketi (Seametal) 10; 

and (6) Tosyali Holding (Toscelik 

Profile and Sheet Ind. Co., Toscelik 

Profil ve Sac A.S.). U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) did not have 

any information to contradict these 

claims of no shipments during the 

POR.11 Therefore, we preliminarily 

determine that these companies did not 

have shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR. Consistent with 

Commerce’s practice,12 Commerce finds 

that it is not appropriate to rescind the 

review with respect to these six 

companies, but rather to complete the 

review and issue appropriate 

instructions to CBP based on the final 

results of this review. 

Discontinuation of Administrative 

Review 

On May 15, 2020, Commerce 

discontinued this review with respect to 

Colakoglu Metalurji, A.S., and 

Colakoglu Dis Ticaret A.S., based on the 

final judgment of the U.S. Court of 

International Trade in the litigation 

associated with the underlying lessthan-fair-value investigation.13

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a less-than-fair-value 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weightedaverage of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ 

In this review, we have preliminarily 

calculated a weighted-average dumping 

margin for Habas that is not zero, de 

minimis, or determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available. Accordingly, we 

have preliminarily assigned to the 

companies not individually examined a 

weighted-average dumping margin of 

21.48 percent, which is the weightedaverage dumping margin calculated for 

Habas. 

Preliminary Results 

We preliminarily determine the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins for the period October 1, 2018, 

through September 30, 2019: 

Producer and exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal 

Endustrisi A.S .................................... 21.48 

Review-Specific Average Rate 

Applicable to the Following 

Companies: 14


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 / Notices 11229 

15See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

16See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

17See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

18See Timken Notice. 

19See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Turkey: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony 

with the Amended Final Determination in the LessThan-Fair-Value Investigation; Notice of Amended 

Final Determination, Amended Antidumping Duty 

Order, Notice of Revocation of Antidumping Duty 

Order in Part; and Discontinuation of the 2017–18 

and 2018–19 Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews, in Part, 85 FR 29399 (May 15, 2020). 

20See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii); see also 19 CFR 

351.303 (for general filing requirements). 

21See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1). 

22See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

23See 19 CFR 351.303. 

24See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

25See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

26See 19 CFR 351.310(c); see also 19 CFR 

351.303(b)(1). 

Producer and/or exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Cag Celik Demir ve Celik ........... 21.48 

Habas Industrial and Medical 

Gases Production Industries 

Inc ........................................... 21.48 

MMK Atakas Metalurji ................ 21.48 

Ozkan Iron and Steel Ind ........... 21.48 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, 

Commerce will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.15 The final results of this review 

shall be the basis for the assessment of 

antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by this review and 

for future deposits of estimated duties, 

where applicable.16 Commerce intends 

to issue assessment instructions to CBP 

no earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

where an examined respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent), we calculated an importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment 

rate based on the ratio of the total 

amount of dumping calculated for the 

U.S. sales for a given importer to the 

total entered value of those sales. Where 

the mandatory respondent did not 

report entered value, we calculated the 

entered value in order to calculate the 

assessment rate. Where either the 

respondent’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an 

importer-specific assessment rate is zero 

or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For the companies that were not 

selected for individual examination, we 

will instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties at an ad valorem rate equal to 

each company’s weighted-average 

dumping margin determined in the final 

results of this review. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Habas for 

which it did not know that its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States and for all entries 

attributed to the companies that we find 

had no shipments during the POR, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate such 

unreviewed entries pursuant to the 

reseller policy,17 i.e., the assessment rate 

for such entries will be equal to the allothers rate established in the 

investigation (i.e., 2.73 percent),18 if 

there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 

cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be equal to 

each company’s weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of this review, (except if the ad 

valorem rate is de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero); (2) for previously investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit will continue 

to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which the company participated; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, or the underlying investigation, 

but the producer is, then the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate established 

for the completed segment for the most 

recent POR for the producer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other producers or exporters 

will continue to be 2.73 percent, the allothers rate established in the underlying 

investigation.19

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed in connection 

with these preliminary results to 

interested parties within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs no later than 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.20

Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, may be filed not later 

than seven days after the time limit for 

filing case briefs.21 Parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding are encouraged to submit 

with each argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of 

authorities.22 Executive summaries 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. Case and rebuttal 

briefs should be filed using ACCESS 

and must be served on interested 

parties.23 Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.24

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Hearing requests should 

contain: (1) The party’s name, address, 

and telephone number; (2) the number 

of participants; and (3) a list of issues to 

be discussed. Issues raised in the 

hearing will be limited to issues raised 

in the briefs. If a request for a hearing 

is made, Commerce intends to hold the 

hearing at a time and date to be 

determined.25 Parties should confirm by 

telephone the date, time, and location of 

the hearing two days before the 

scheduled date. 

An electronically-filed request for a 

hearing must be received successfully in 

its entirety by ACCESS by 5 p.m. 

Eastern Time within 30 days after the 

date of publication of this notice.26

Final Results of Review 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

issues raised in all written briefs, not 

later than 120 days after the publication 

of these preliminary results in the 

Federal Register pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
11230 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 / Notices 

27See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

1See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 

from Turkey: Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission, and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2018– 

2019, 85 FR 44861 (July 24, 2020) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

3See Noksel’s Letter, ‘‘Light-Walled Rectangular 

Pipe And Tube from Turkey: Noksel’s Case Brief,’’ 

dated August 24, 2020; see also Nucor’s Letter, 

‘‘Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from 

Turkey: Nucor Tubular’s Case Brief and Request to 

Participate in Any Hearing Requested,’’ dated 

August 24, 2020. 

4See Nucor’s Letter, ‘‘Light-Walled Rectangular 

Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Nucor Tubular’s 

Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated August 31, 2020. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Light-Walled Rectangular 

Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Extension of Deadline 

for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated January 15, 2021. 

6See Memorandum ‘‘2018–2019 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review of Light-Walled 

Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Turkey: Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final Results,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

7See Preliminary Results. 

351.213(h)(1), unless otherwise 

extended.27

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: February 17, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Examination 

VI. Period of Review 

VII. Discussion of the Methodology 

VIII. Currency Conversion 

IX. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–03783 Filed 2–23–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–489–815] 

Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and 

Tube From Turkey: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of No 

Shipments; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) determines that Noksel 

Celik Boru Sanayi A.S. (Noksel) made 

U.S. sales of light-walled rectangular 

pipe and tube (LWRPT) from Turkey at 

less than normal value during the 

period of review (POR) i.e., May 1, 2018, 

through April 30, 2019. 

DATES: Applicable February 24, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Hanna, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0835. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 24, 2020, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results for 

the administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order covering 

LWRPT from Turkey for the POR, May 

1, 2018, through April 30, 2019.1 On 

July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all 

deadlines in administrative reviews by 

60 days, thereby extending the deadline 

for these final results until January 19, 

2021.2 On August 24, 2020, Commerce 

received case briefs from Nucor Tubular 

Products Inc. (Nucor) and Noksel.3 On 

August 31, 2020, Commerce received a 

rebuttal brief from Nucor.4 On January 

15, 2021, Commerce extended the 

deadline for these final results of review 

until February 16, 2021.5

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the AD 

order is certain welded carbon quality 

light-walled steel pipe and tube, of 

rectangular (including square) cross 

section, having a wall thickness of less 

than 4 millimeters. The merchandise 

subject to the order is classified in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States at subheadings 

7306.61.50.00 and 7306.61.70.60. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

We addressed all issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs filed in this 

administrative review in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. A list of the 

sections in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is in the Appendix to this 

notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ 

frn/index.html. The signed Issues and 

Decision Memorandum and the 

electronic version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

We made the following changes to the 

preliminary dumping margin 

calculations: (1) We revised the 

methodology used to assign costs to 

products that were sold during the POR, 

but not produced during the POR (see 

Comment 3 in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum); (2) we included 

international freight and loading 

expenses in U.S. movement expenses 

(see Comment 4 in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum); and (3) we 

calculated indexed costs using 

theoretical, rather than actual, 

production quantities (see Comment 5 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, we found 

that the following six companies made 

no shipments of subject merchandise to 

the United States during the POR: (1) 

C ̧ayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.; 

(2) Yu ̈ cel Boru ve Profil Endu ̈ strisi A.S.; 

(3) Yu ̈ celboru Ihracat Ithalat ve 

Pazarlama A.S.; (4) Tosc ̧elik Profil ve 

Sac Endu ̈ strisi A.S.; (5) Tosyali Dis 

Ticaret A.S.; and (6) Toscelik Metal 

Ticaret A.S.7 No parties commented on 

this determination. For the final results 

of review, we continue to find that these 

companies made no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR. 

Final Results of Review 

We are assigning following dumping 

margin to the firm listed below for the 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES