SUMMARY MINUTES OFTHE BOARD OFTHE SOUTH COASTAIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT



## ~ SAUNDRA McDANIEL, CLERKOFTHEBOARD

FRIDAY, AUGUST 6,2004

Notice having been duly given, the regular meeting of the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board was held at District Headquarters, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. Members present: William A. Burke, Ed.D., Chairman Speaker of the Assembly Appointee Supervisor S. RoyWilson, Ed.D. 

### Countyof Riverside Vice Chairman Supervisor Michael D.Antonovich County of LosAngeles Ms.Jane W. Carney Senate RulesCommittee Appointee Councilmember William S. Craycraft Cities of Orange County Mayor BeatriceJ. S. LaPisto-Kirtley Cities of LosAngeles County

## - Eastern Region Mayor RonaldO. Loveridge 

### Citiesof Riverside

County Councilmember Jan Perry Cities of LosAngeles County

## - Western Region Supervisor Bill Postmus County of San Bernardino Ms. Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta Governor's Appointee Councilmember Dennis R. Yates Cities of San Bernardino County Members Absent: Supervisor JamesW. Silva County of Orange.2-

PledgeofAllegiance: Led by Ms. Perry. Presentation of Retirement Award to John Higuchi



## . Chairman Burke presented a crystal dove award to John Higuchi, Source Testing & Monitoring Manager, in recognition of37 years-ofDistrict service.



### CONSENT

CALENDAR ~ Minutes of July 9, 2004 Board Meeting 

### 1 Set Public Hearings September 3,2004 to ConsiderAmendments and/or Adoption to AQMD Rules and Regulations 

### 2

Amend Rule 1121.

## -Control of NitrogenOxidesfrom ResidentialType,

Natural Gas-Fired Water Heaters (A).

Amend Rule 2007 

### -TradingRequirements Set Informational Hearing September 3,2004for Proposed Amendments to RECLAIM Execute Contractfor Security Guard Servicesat Diamond Bar Headquarters 3. ReviseAQMD Policy on Military Leave Payand Sign Statement of Supportfor Reservist Employment Rights 4 

### AdoptResolutionAmending Hearing Board Compensation 5. Approve 

### SalaryAdjustment for DistrictCounsel 6, Execute Contractto Cosponsor Demonstration ofAdvanced Diesel Emission Control System in Diesel-Fueled Heavy-Duty Enginesto Meet 2010 Heavy-Duty Emissions Standards 1.

Execute Contracts to Demonstrate Hydrogen Fueling Stations 8, Amend Seven Contracts and ExecuteContractfor FY2002-03 Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standards Attainment Programand Issue an RFPfor 2004 Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standarc;is Attainment Program Funding 9,-3



### 10. Approve Grantsto Retrofit Diesel School Buseswith ParticulateTraps and Issue ProgramAnnouncement andApplicationfor NewSchool Buseswith Fundingfrom State's Proposition 40 and Chairman's Modified School Bus Initiative and Installation of Oxidation Catalystswith Fundingfrom U.S. EPA De-Obligate Prior Funding Commitments and Reissue RFP Award Contract for Liquefied Natural Gas RefuelingStation Infrastructure to SYSCO FoodServices 

### 11C AwardContract

for LiquefiedNaturalGasRefueling StationInfrastructure

to Burrtec.Inc. Award Multiple Contracts for Natural Gas RefuelingStation Infrastructure to Clean Energy, Inc. Award Multiple Contracts for Natural Gas Refueling Station Infrastructure 

### 12, Reissue RFPfor Demonstration of Natural Gas,Stationary Fuel Cells in South Coast Air Basin 13. Execute Purchase Orders fOT Portable Low-Level PollutantAnalytical Instruments to Demonstrate Feasibilityto Measure Low-Level Pollutant Concentrations 14 FiscalYear 2004-05 Budget Transfer Relatingto Series 2004 Pension Obligation Bonds Debt Service Appropriate Funds from General Fund, Undesignated Fund Balance, to District Prosecutor's 

### FY2004-05Budget 16 Approve inConcept FY2004-05 $15.3 MillionAB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program, Release of Six Solicitations, Two Sole-Source Contracts, and Commitments forThree Additional Elements 

### 17 Public

### AffairsReport 18. Hearing Board 

### Report 19 Civil Filing and Civil Penalties 

### Report LeadAgency Projects and Environmental Documents Received byAOMD 

### 21 Rule and Control Measure Forecast

### ~ 

## (

Report of RFPs and RFQs Scheduled for Release in August 22, Status Report on Major Projects for Information Management Scheduled to Start During First Six Months of FY 2004-05 23 Agenda Items 8 and 10 were withheld for discussion. Ms. Camey indicated she would abstain from Item 1 because of her absence from the July 9, 2004 Board meeting. Ms. LaPisto-Kinley disclosed that one of the contractor's under Item 10 is her employer, the Los Angeles Unified School District, but she had been advised by District Counsel that she could panicipate because a government exception to the conflict of interest rule applies. Several Board members indicated potential conflict of interests relative to Item 11A-E and abstained as set forth below.

ON MOTION OF DR. WilSON, SECONDED BY MS. laPISTO-KIRTlEY (Absent: Silva), THE BOARD: 1) APPROVED AGENDA ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7, 9, AND 11 THROUGH 23; 2) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 04-22, AMENDING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND SALARY RESOLUTION REGARDING COMPENSATION FOR EMPLOYEES ON TEMPORARY MILITARY lEAVES OF ABSENCE; AND 3) ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 04-23, AMENDING THE ANNUAL COMPENSATION FOR HEARING BOARD MEMB~RS AND THEIR ALTERNATES, EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2004; AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, BY THE FOllOWING VOTE:

Antonovich [except Items 110 & 11EJ, Burke [except Items 11 A, 11 B, 110, & 11

EJ, Carney [except Items 1 & 11BJ, Craycraft, Loveridge, LaPisto-Kirtley, Perry [except Items 11B, 11C, 110, & 11E], Postmus [except Item 11 CJ, Verdugo-Peralta, Wilson [except Item 11CJ,

and Yates. AYES:

None. NOES Antonovich [01'1 Items 110 & 11 E only], Burke [on Items 11

A, 11 B, 110 & 11E only] Carney [on Items 1& 11B only], Perry [on Items 11 B, 11C, 110, & 11

E only], Postmus [on Item 11 Conly],andWilson [on Item 11 Conly]. ABST AI N

Silva. ABSENT:-5.

Items Deferredfrom Consent Calendar 

### 24. Execute Contracts to Demonstrate Hydrogen Fueling Stations 

### 8 Rick Sikes, Fleet Superintendent for the City of Santa Monica, addressed the Board. He expressed the City's commitment to alternate fuels and interest in participating in a hydrogen demonstration project; and requested that the Board table the item until a commitment is made to discuss the City's participation. (Submittedwritten comments) Dr. Wallerstein confirmed that he informed the City Manager that while the Board is moving forward with the four items, the Board letter denotes that funding is available for a fifth city, and the City Manager agreed to have the matter discussed at the City Council meeting in September. ON MOTION OF MR. YATES, SECONDED BY

MS. VERDUGO-PERALTA,o AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED (Absent: Silva), THE BOARD APPROVED AGENDA ITEM NO.8, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. Approve Grantsto Retrofit DieselSchool Buseswith Particulate Traps and Issue Program Announcement andApplication for New School Buses with Funding fromState's Proposition40 and Chairman's Modified School Bus Initiative and InstallationofOxidation Catalysts with Funding from U.S. EPA 

### 10

The following individuals addressed the Board to comment on Item 

### No.10. RICK FEINSTEIN. ColtonJoint Unifieg S~~ool Distri~ Expressed supportfor CNGschool buses and particulate traps, and thanked staff for listening to their concerns and working to enhance the program. RICK BENFIELD. Tumbleweed TransDortation Opposed cost sharing for private contractors; and requested that the proposal be modifiedto fund small companies within the AQMD region at 100 percent of the cost, as originally proposed in the program announcement. In response to Dr. Burke's question, Chung Liu, DEO of Science & Technology Advancement, noted that the five contractors who submitted applications agreed to a 25 percentcost sharing; that school buses would be funded at 100 percent; and that all program announcements indicate thatthe Board hasthe discretiontofund any or none ofthe programs.~ In response to Dr. Burke's concern with Mr. Benfield's comment that the program announcement was changed, Dr. Wallerstein recommended that Item No.1 0 be continued to the September 3, 2004 Board meeting. 

## (

Dr. Burke continued Item No.1 0 to the September 3, 2004 Board meeting, and directed staff to advise the Board members as to whether the original program announcement was advertised as full or partial funding.

-0- Colonel Brad Jones, California National Guard Employee Support of Guard and Reserve (ESGR); Major General Peter Gravitt, former Commander 40thInfantry Division; Mr. Bill Hoston, Chairman, ESGR; Colonel Joseph Smith, Director, Los Angeles County Department of Military & Veteran's Affairs; and Ms. Tamiko Hirano, Special Assistant to California Chair, ESGR, made the following presentations:

Colonel Jones presented Mr. Antonovich with the California Commendation Medal and the Seven Seals Award for his meritorious achievement and outstanding leadership during the period of December 12, 2003 to July 31, 2004 while serving as Supervisor for Los Angeles County and Special Assistant to the Adjutant General and for his initiative and support to the men and women who serve inthe Army National Guard and Reserves. Mr. Antonovich expressed his appreciation for the recognition and honor of receiving the commendations and noted his assurance that the men andwomen intheir respective agencies would receive the same opportunities to ensure that their pay and benefits are preserved asthey defend our country during this time ofwar. Mr. Haston presented a statement of support to Chairman Burke, on behalf ofthe Guard & Reserves. Chairman Burke notedthat it is the District's pleasure to participate in the program and to provide support to ourtroops.
-0- 

### BOARDCALENDAR Administrative Committee Legislative Committee.1~

.27 Mobile Source Committee 28 Stationary Source Committee 

### 29. Technology

Committee 30 Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee

Mr. Postmusand Mr.Yates indicated they would vote noon Item No.26, with respecttothe recommended positions onAB 1 009and 5B 429 only. 

### MS. laPISTO-KIRTlEY MOVED TO RECEIVE AND AGENDA ITEMS 25 THROUGH 30, AND ADOPT FOllOWING POSITIONS ON lEGISLATION, RECOMMENDED BYSTAFF: 

### FILE THE AS

AS 1009(Pavley) Air Pollution: Heavy-Duty

Vfjhicles:Emissions Support

AB 1394(Levine & Montanez) Air Pollution: Carl Moyer MemorialAir Quality Standards Attainment Program: Particulate Matter SupportWith Amendments

AB 2353 (Leslie) Neighborhood Electric Vehicles Support 58429 (Torlakson) Energy Resources: Petroleum

Infrastructure Permits: Projects Support

TH.E MOTION WAS SECONDED BY MR. lOVERIDGE, AND CARRIED BYTHE FOllOWING VOTE: AYES: Antonovich, Burke, Carney, Craycraft,

LaPisto-Kirtley, Loveridge, Perry, Postmus [except on AB 1009 and SB 429J, Verdugo-Peralta, Yates [except on AB 1009 and 5B 429], and Wilson. NOES: Postmus 

### and Yates[on AS 1009 and SB 429

only]. ABSENT: Silva.

31. California Air Resources Board Monthly Report (NoWritten Material -Transcripts

ofthe meetingsareavailableatCARB's website,www.arb.ca.gov) 

### 32. California Fuel Cell Partnership SteeringTeam Meeting.8-
ON MOTION OF MS. LaPISTO-KIRTLEY, SECONDED BY MR. LOVERIDGE, AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED (Absent: Silva), THE BOARD RECE1VEDAND FILED AGENDA ITEMS 31AND 32,AS RECOMMENDED BYSTAFF. PUBLIC HEARINGS 

### AdoptProposed Rule 1127

## -Emission Reductionsfrom Livestock Waste 33. Julia Lester, Program Supervisor of Planning, Rul~ Development, and Area Sources,gavethe staff report. Mr. Yates commended Dr. Lester and her staff for the work performed on Proposed Rule 1127andforworking withthe dairy industry. The public hearing was opened, and the Board heard testimony from the following individuals. MARTIN SCHLAGETER. Coalition for CleanAir Suggested that the Board direct staff to: continue to identify and solicit funding to subsidize digesters; support legislation remedies and incentives; and develop demonstration projects. (Submittedwritten comments) Opposed the requirement of removing manure four times a year, and requested, if Proposed Rule 1127 is approved, that staff consult the dairy industry and report back to the Board in one year on the effects that Proposed Rule 1127 has had onthe dairy industry.

.Notedthat complying with many of the requirements, such asthose pertaining tothe weather and haulers, are out of his control, and that the information being used is based on inaccurate reporting from a 1938study. (Submitted written comments) In response to questions and concerns raised by Board Members, Dr. Lester, Laki Tisopulos, Assistant DEO of Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources, and Dr.Wallerstein madethefollowing clarifications.



### Staffrecognizes that there will be additional costs ifthe manure is wet, and the Rule provides an exemption provision ifthe manure is more than 50 percent wet. The additional cost is the cost of the Rule as opposed to imposing higher capital costs for on-dairy controls. The window for stockpile removalwas widened to address the field being available for spreading; and staff believes Proposed Rule 1127 opens up additional options, such as alternative manure composting.-9.



### Staffwill provide a report inone yearonthe implementation issues, at which time staff will have a better idea of what is happening in thefield andthe waterquality regulationswill be completed. 

### Thedairymen, aswell asthe haulers,were included inthe working group, and their inputwas used to formulate Proposed Rule 1127. Staff believes the Rule isworkable based onthe full input received from all parties. The Proposed Rule has been in the AQMP since 1994; and, in response to dairy concerns, a study on ammonia and VaG emissions was conducted. Ammonia leads to increased aerosol particulates and 2006 is the attainment date to achieve PM10 standards. 

### Particulatelevels immediately downwrndof the dairies are amongst the highest inthe nationfor PM2.5. The 1938 study and the emissions work being done in the central valley is for VaG emissions, not ammonia emissions. The VaG emissions are being reviewed and updated. NATHANde BOOM. Milk Producers Council Noted that the dairy industry hopes to double the capacity of digesters to allow more dairy participation; are working with the Inland Empire on an alternative composting pilot project; will work with staff on the implementation of streamlined record keeping and reporting; supports the continuance of credits for the dairy industry; and are concerned with the effects that implementation of Proposed Rule 1127will have onfuture developments inthe basin. Confirmed that 35 dairies exited and 38,000 cowswere lost in2003, and the same numbers areexpected in2004 and 2005 inthe Riversideand Chino area. Mr. Yates noted that it would be a huge loss for the dairy economy. He commended the Milk Producers Council for working hand in hand with staff, and urgedthe Districtto participate inthe cofunding ofthe new biodigesters. Ms. Verdugo-Peralta notedthe importance of reviewing and supporting the digester process, which will bring revenue to the dairy owners and cities and add energyto the grid; and she directed staffto reviewthe digester situation. There being no further public testimony on this item, the public hearing was closed.-to.. ON MOTION OF MS. CARNEY, SECONDED BY MR. CRAYCRAFT, AND UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED (Absent: Silva), THE BOARD ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 04-24, ADOPTING RULE 1127AND CERTIFY1NGTHE CEQA FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. 

## (

OTHER BUSINESS 

### 34. P.etitionsby Communities for a Better Environment and Carlos Valdez, Southern California PipeTrades DistrictCouncil 16,and UnitedAssociation ofJourneymen andApprentices ot the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry ofthe United States and Canada, Local 250for RegulationXII Hearingon ConocoPhillips Company's PermitApplication for LosAngeles Refinery Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel Project District Counsel Barbara Baird notedthat, pursuant to Regulation XII, any person may request a hearing before the Board on a pending permit. Two petitions to request hearings are beforethe Board, andthe holding ofthe hearing isdiscretionary with the Board. Sheoutlinedthe procedures ifthe Board decides to hold a hearing. In response to questions and concerns raised by Board Members, Ms. Baird, District Prosecutor Peter Mieras, and Dr. Wallerstein made the following clarifications. - .

The petitioners have filed suit against the District, and if the Board hears the item there would be nothing to preclude the petitioners from continuing to sue if they do not like the decision made by the District. It is staff's position that given the matter is in court to resolve the issue, there is no purposeof having a proceeding beforethe Board. What is beforethe Board atthis time isto decide whether to have a hearing. The Board will listen to the arguments made by the petitioners, and make itsdecision. The following individuals addressed the Board to comment on Item 

### No.34. RICHARD DRURY, representing petitionersCarlos Valdez, Salvador Guererro, District Council PioeTrades 16.andSteamfitters & Pioefitters Local250 Expressed support for ConocoPhillips' creating low sulfur diesel fuel; however, believes an environmental impact report (EIR) should be prepared in order to minimize to the maximum extent possible the impact the increased emissions will have ontheWilmington community.-11 

### Notedthat the District does not provide an administrative appeals process for CEQA disputes, and the Hearing Board does not have jurisdiction to hear CEQA issues, which leaves the Governing Board asthe only bodyfor an internal appeal. Spoke of the importance of keeping the District out of litigation and of the democratic values in society that the Executive Officer not be aU owed unfettered discretion to make decisionsonthe issuance ofthe permit. Presented a slide chart onthe emissions from the ConocoPhillips project. Expressed belief that an EIA report should have been prepared because emissions are higher than the threshold, and mitigation measures to reduce the impact must be implemented. Staff did not prepare an EIA, and declared in the final negative declaration that the real CEQA threshold was 8,373 pounds per day. This allows ConocoPhillips to increase emissions by 5,000 per day before having to do an EIR, while a "mom and pop" business that increases their emissions over 55 pounds a day must do an EIA. (Submitted copies of 

### comparisonchart) SCOTTKUHN. Communities for a Better Environment (CBE) Noted that the matter is in court because the District approved the negative declaration, and there is a 3D-daystatute of limitations. He urged the Board to exercise its discretion to control staff from changing the rules and to resolve the matterthrough anadministrative process. JOCELYN THOMPSON. reDresentinaConocoPhilliDS Noted that ConocoPhil1ipsfiled a response to the two petitions, and she urged the Board to reject the request for a Regulation XII hearing. She requested that any briefs, letters, or other materials filed by the Unions and CBE less than five days before today's meeting be rejected by the Clerk and stricken from the record without being considered by the Board, as the documents were notfiled in atimely manner pursuant to RegulationXII. In response to questions and concerns raised by Board Members, Baird and Dr.Wallerstein madethefollowing clarifications. 

### Ms. Regulation XII providesthat any party may file a document upto five

days before the Board's consideration of the matter, and authorizes the rejection of pleadings that are inconsistent with the rule. The documents were not rejected because itwas not clear as to whether the Clerk should makethat decision or ifthe Board should make the decision. After consultation with District Counsel, in the spirit of the Board policies of open information, and so as not to appear that there was an attempt to exclude materials from the Board on this issue, the decision of the Executive Officer was to submit the materials to the Board.~l2. 

# ( The decision by the Executive Officer to issue the negative declaration is the subject of the lawsuit. The petitioners would not likely' prevail in court as to a decision by the Board to not hold a hearing onthe issuance ofthe permit. The statutory public process for CEQA was followed and final determination was made through the standard process. An extensive public process was conducted and extensive answers to the issues made bythe plaintiffswere provided. The project was analyzed, and examined by District Counsel to ensure it had been conducted according to CECA statutes. Staff reviewed the project with the Executive Officer, and a determination according to CEQA and Board policies was made by the Executive Officer. The Executive Officer has the authority to make the decision regarding a negative declaration. .Ifthe Board grants a hearing, the Boardwould bethe decision makerfor CEQA and the permit. CEQA provides if there is a fair argument supported by scientific evidence that there is a significant adverse environmental impact, then an EIR should be required. In this case, --the-evidence that argued in favor of having an EIR was based on erroneous assumptions, not upon fact to consti1ute substantial evidence supporting an EIR; and there are no bases for changing the documentfrom a negativedeclaration to an EIR. 

### Staff shares the Board's and Plaintiff's concerns regarding Wilmington. Significant resources were spent carefully going over the emissions calculation, and it is staff's belief that the impacts were correctly analyzed and are well below the District's thresholds. Dr. Wallerstein noted that the petitioners were late in the submittal of certain documents; and those documents will be rejected by the Clerk and returned tothe petitioners. Ms. Thompson noted that discussions regarding the CEQA significance threshold are misleading, and that the refinery can increase emissions by 8,000 pounds aday without an EIA is a mischaracterization. The increaseof pollutants will be minor. There is not a NOx or ozone problem for the community of Wilmington because ofthis project, and ConocoPhillips agrees that a Regulation XII hearing is notwarranted.-13-



### DistrictProsecutor Peter Mieras presented the District's argument on this matter. He noted it is a small, environmentally beneficial project that will not increase diesel production or crude throughput at the refinery. The issue is whether the Executive Officer, the authorized CEQA decision maker, made the correct decision in certifying a negative declaration as opposed to an EIA. The project will not come close to any significant increase in emissions while being constructed noroperated. The operation of allthe equipmentassociated with this project will comply with all existing limits. The District did not create a new NOx significant standard. The 55 standard pounds adopted by the Board was used, and the "new" standard referred to by the pet,tioners is 1he base line level of emissions calculated bythe District. Ms. Verdugo-Peralta noted her concern to respond to the communities who have been impacted for long periods of time and because ofthe cumulative effects occurring in these areas. She commended ConocoPhillips for putting forth a project that will have low-sulfur diesel; however, the Board must give Wilmington theirdue diligence by listeningto the community. Mr. Craycraft noted that the Board has given the community due diligence inthis process, staff goes to great lengthsto address the issues by communities affected bythe District's rules, and nothing hasoccurred inthe processthat isan exception to what has been done or how other people have been treated 

### throughout

thebasin.

- Mr. Yates noted his complete agreement with Ms. Verdugo-Peralta's comments; however, because the matter is in the courts, that is where it ultimately will bedecided.

MR. CRAYCRAFT MOVED TO DENY THE PETITIONS FOR A HEARING ON CONOCOPHllLiPS ULTRA lOW SULFUR DIESEL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, AS RECOMMENDED BYSTAFF, AND TO REQUESTTHAT STAFF CONTINUE TO BE SENSITIVE TO THE NEEDS OF THE WilMINGTON COMMUNITY. THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY MR. YATES, AND CARRIED BYTHE FOllOWING VOTE: AYES: Antonovich, Burke, Carney, Craycraft, Loveridge,

LaPisto-Kirtley, Perry, Postmus, Wilson, and Yates. NOES Verdugo-Peralta ABSENT: Silva..14-

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (PublicCommenton Non-AgendaItems, Pursuantto GovernmentCodeSection 54954.3) There.was no public comment on non-agenda items.

CLOSED SESSION The Board recessed to closed session at 11:00 a.m., pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(a) to confer with its counsel regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the District is a party. The actions are: Engine Manufacturers Association, et al. v. SCAQMD, et al., U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 02-1343; People of the State of California ex rei SCAQMD v. BP West Coas1 Products, LLC, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC291876; Communities for a Better Environment v. SCAQMD, et al., ConocoPhillips Company, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. B8091275; and Carlos Valdez, et al. v. 8CAQMD, et al., ConocoPhillips Company, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 8S091276.


### ADJOURNMENT Following closed session, District Counsel Barbara Baird announced that no actionsweretaken inclosed session, andthe meetingwas adjourned at11 :15a.m. Theforegoing isatrue statement ofthe proceedings held bythe South Coast Air Quality Management District Board on August 6, 2004. Respectfully Submitted 

# ~O

/"'1 S;!;ior De~ut;flerk ate Minutes 

# Approved:

9- ,3- O-y I ,-IS,
ACRONYMS Cal/EPA 

### - CaliforniaEnvironmental Protection Agency CARB =California Air Resources Board CEOA = California Environmental Quality Act CNG

### - Compressed Natural Gas 'CO

### - Carbon Monoxide EJR

### - Environmental Impact Report EPA

# -Environmental Protection Agency FYa FiscalYear NO. = Oxides of Nitrogen PM,o= Particulate Matter ~ 10 microns PM2.5 = Particulate Matter s.2.5 microns PR

### - Proposed Rule RFP

# -Request for Proposals RFQ

### - Request for Quotations VOCz VolatileOrganicCompound