alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.151 *Ex parte* communications. ( a ) At no stage of the proceeding between its institution and the issuance of the final decision shall the Judge or Judicial Officer discuss *ex parte* the merits of the proceeding with any person who is connected with the proceeding in an advocative or in an investigative capacity, or with any representative of such person: *Provided,* That procedural matters shall not be included within this limitation; and *Provided further,* That the Judge or Judicial Officer may discuss the merits of the case with such a person if all parties to the proceeding, or their attorneys have been given notice and an opportunity to participate. A memorandum of any such discussion shall be included in the record.
( b ) No interested person shall make or knowingly cause to be made to the Judge or Judicial Officer an *ex parte* communication relevant to the merits of the proceeding.
( c ) If the Judge or the Judicial Officer receives an *ex parte* communication in violation of this section, the one who receives the communication shall place in the public record of the proceeding: ( 1 ) All such written communications;
( 2 ) Memoranda stating the substance of all such oral communications; and
( 3 ) All written responses, and memoranda stating the substance of all oral responses thereto.
( d ) Upon receipt of a communication knowingly made or knowingly caused to be made by a party in violation of this section, the Judge or Judicial Officer may, to the extent consistent with the interests of justice and the policy of the underlying statute, require the party to show cause why his claim or interest in the proceeding should not be dismissed, denied, disregarded, or otherwise adversely affected on account of such violation.
( e ) To the extent consistent with the interests of justice and the policy of the underlying statute, a violation of this section shall be sufficient grounds for a decision adverse to the party who knowingly commits a violation of this section or who knowingly causes such a violation to occur.
( f ) For purposes of this section *ex parte communication* means an oral or written communication not on the public record with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all parties is not given, but it shall not include requests for status reports on any matter or the proceeding.
#### Rachel Anania, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 37299.)

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts *757by increasing the award to $15,500, with interest, and as modified affirmed, with costs to claimant. Certain finding of fact and conclusion of law modified. Memorandum: In determining valuation the trial court failed to give sufficient weight to the added value of the property by reason of its proximity to Seneca Lake. While the comparable sales submitted by the State were helpful as a basis for the award, none of them had this beneficial factor. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims for claimant on a claim for permanent appropriation of realty.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
#### H. J. O’Shea, trading as O’Shea Employment System, appellee, v. Innis L. Robottom, defendant, and Woodward & Cochey Manufacturing Company, garnishee, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,684.

Garnishment proceedings. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Asa G. Adams, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Reversed.

Opinion filed May 25, 1926.

Charles Center Case, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
 
 Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of US Biodefense, Inc., a Utah corporation (the "Company"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:
  The
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended November 30, 2007 (the "Form
10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in
the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
March 18, 2008
   By: /s/
Scott Gallagher
 ------------------------------------
 Scott
Gallagher
 Chief
Executive Officer and
 Acting
Chief Financial Officer
8.603 Purchase priorities. FPI and nonprofit agencies participating in the AbilityOne Program under 41 U.S.C. chapter 85, Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled (see subpart 8.7), may produce identical supplies or services. When this occurs, ordering offices shall purchase supplies and services in the following priorities: ( a ) *Supplies.* ( 1 ) Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (41 U.S.C. 8504).
( 2 ) AbilityOne participating nonprofit agencies.
( 3 ) Commercial sources.
( b ) *Services.* ( 1 ) AbilityOneparticipating nonprofit agencies.
( 2 ) Federal Prison Industries, Inc., or commercial sources.
[69 FR 16149, Mar. 26, 2004, as amended at 73 FR 53994, Sept. 17, 2008; 79 FR 24199, Apr. 29, 2014]
#### Nyack Rural Cemetery, Inc., Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 39210.)—

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims which dismissed a claim filed May 20, 1961 against the State of New York for continuing trespass and confiscation; arising out of the State’s construction, and the subsequent public use of a highway upon lands of claimant against which Rockland County in 1931 commenced condemnation proceedings of disputed validity. The only question which must be decided is whether the 'State is guilty of trespass. Whether the 1931 proceeding was valid to pass an easement or whether it was void so that an easement was eventually acquired by the State by prescription, the State is not a trespasser because under either theory it has a right to be on the land, Judgment affirmed, *763without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum by the court.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Pablo Leonardo, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>In consolidated criminal appeals, defendant, as limited by his brief, appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Alexander M. Tisch, J.), rendered November 21, 2013, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of petit larceny, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Alexander M. Tisch, J.), rendered November 21, 2013, affirmed. The accusatory instrument charging petit larceny (<i>see</i> Penal Law § 155.25) was not jurisdictionally defective. Defendant's larcenous intent is reasonably inferred from allegations that he placed items of merchandise "in his backpack," and "walk[ed] past the registers without paying for the items" (<i>see People v Olivo</i>, 52 NY2d 309, 318—319 [1981]; <i>People v Brunson</i>, 294 AD2d 104 [2002], <i>lv denied </i>98 NY2d 695 [2002]). Contrary to defendant's contention, a shoplifter need not leave the store to be guilty of larceny (<i>see People v Olivo, </i>52 NY2d at 317-319).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: April 17, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Broadband Access Resources 
            -           Broadband Access Resources for K-12 Education Providers      

# Broadband Access Resources for K-12 Education Providers

## What Service Do You Need?

Funding is available to provide different types of connectivity for K-12 education providers. The two main categories of funding include access to broadband (internet services) or access to equipment/devices. Many federal funding streams provide funds for both of these categories.

The **BROADBAND**category includes services such as:
                  - Broadband services
                  - Voice and data services
                  - Data transmission services
                  - Internet access
                  - Internal connections

The **EQUIPMENT & DEVICES** category includes services such as:
                  - Network equipment (i.e., routers, wireless controller systems, cabling, software, etc.)
                  - Distance learning equipment (i.e., laptops, tablets)

The **INFRASTRUCTURE** category includes services such as:
                  - Construction
                  - Expansion
                  - Improvements
                  - Acquisitions

*<< Back to **Broadband Access Resources — Who are You?** page*
Exhibit 10.11


 





 


 


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

 





 


 


 






    	 	2	 



     


    

 





 


 


 






    	 	3	 



     


    

 





 


 


 






    	 	4
Second Department,

November, 1964

(November 2, 1964)

#### In the Matter of Hilton Soba, An Attorney, Respondent. Samuel Greason, Petitioner.

This is a proceeding to discipline respondent, an attorney. at law, for professional misconduct. While the petition contains three specifications, one basic charge is alleged, namely: that for a period of years respondent had made it a practice to commingle his personal funds with the escrow funds held by him for his clients; that he used such escrow funds for his personal purposes; and that from time to time he repaid certain of the escrow funds by utilizing other escrow funds and that he did so after complaints had been made to one prosecuting agency or another (Nassau County Bar Association, the District Attorney and the Judicial Inquiry on Professional Conduct). The learned Justice to whom the issues were referred for hearing has submitted his report in which he finds that the charge has been sustained both by the proof and by the respondent’s own admissions. The petitioner now moves to confirm the Justice’s report and for appropriate disciplinary action against respondent. The motion is granted; the report is confirmed; and the respondent is to be disciplined as hereinafter indicated. It appears from the record that the respondent has repaid all the moneys due to his clients; that he has discontinued his prior commingling practices; and that he co-operated with the petitioner and with the Justice at the hearings *790and made a full disclosure of bis financial records and prior misconduct, ft also appears that the balance in his account was usually insufficient to repay, the .escrow funds and, during one period, was some $18,000 less than the escrow funds entrusted to him by his clients; that he manipulated the escrow funds by using the moneys of one client to pay another; that, from time to time, he indiscriminately and habitually used all the escrow funds for bis own purposes; that such commingling and use of the funds were without the knowledge or consent of the clients; and that, while he has finally repaid all his clients, he did so only after complaints for withholding funds had been made against him by his clients to the prosecuting agencies. Ordinarily such conduct on the part of an attorney in the handling and use of his clients’ funds would require a severe penalty. However, in view of respondent’s full and frank disclosure; his co-operation with the petitioner and the Justice in this proceeding; and his complete restitution to his clients, he is suspended from the practice of the law for two years, effective as of January 1, 1965. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Christ, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### 52.214-34 Submission of Offers in the English Language.

As prescribed in 14.201-6(w), insert the following provision:

# Submission of Offers in the English Language (APR 1991)

Offers submitted in response to this solicitation shall be in the English language. Offers received in other than English shall be rejected.

(End of provision)

[56 FR 15155, Apr. 15, 1991, as amended at 56 FR 33487, July 22, 1991; 58 FR 31143, May 28, 1993; 62 FR 51271, Sept. 30, 1997; 64 FR 51841, Sept. 24, 1999; 64 FR 72433, Dec. 27, 1999]
### NUMBER 13
- 14
- 00 075
- CR


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

ADAM WAYNE WALKER , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

.

On appeal from the 36 th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Adam Wayne Walker , attempts to appeal his conviction for sexual

assault . The trial court has certified that this “ is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2).2

On February 5, 2014 , this Court notified appellant ’ s counsel of the trial court ’ s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appella nt has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel ’ s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.
On February 10, 2014 , counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel ’ s response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed
if the trial court ’ s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is
DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 20th day of February, 2014

.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-49592)pertaining to the Bank Mutual Corporation 401k Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-60498) pertaining to the Bank Mutual Corporation 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, and in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-115138) pertaining to the Bank Mutual Corporation 2004Stock Incentive Plan of our reports dated January 28, 2005 with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Bank Mutual Corporation and Subsidiaries, Bank Mutual Corporationmanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of Bank Mutual Corporation and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
March 11, 2005
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization — National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011      

# Prevalence and Characteristics of Sexual Violence, Stalking, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization — National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011

This report describes the overall prevalence of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization in the United States using data from 2011. It reveals that nearly 54% of all female victims and 48% of all male victims experienced their first victimizations before age 25, many of whom were first victimized during childhood or adolescence.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
§ 1.656 What are the requirements for transcription of the hearing? ( a ) *Transcript and reporter's fees.* The hearing will be transcribed verbatim. ( 1 ) The Forest Service will secure the services of a reporter and pay the reporter's fees to provide an original transcript to the OALJ on an expedited basis.
( 2 ) Each party must pay the reporter for any copies of the transcript obtained by that party.
( b ) *Transcript corrections.* ( 1 ) Any party may file a motion proposing corrections to the transcript. The motion must be filed within 5 days after receipt of the transcript, unless the ALJ sets a different deadline.
( 2 ) Unless a party files a timely motion under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the transcript will be presumed to be correct and complete, except for obvious typographical errors.
( 3 ) As soon as practicable after the close of the hearing and after consideration of any motions filed under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the ALJ will issue an order making any corrections to the transcript that the ALJ finds are warranted.
#### § 1.121 Penalties.

The criminal penalties which have been established for violations of the Privacy Act of 1974 are set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(i). These penalties are applicable to any officer or employee of an agency who commits any of the acts enumerated in 5 U.S.C. 552a(i). These penalties also apply to contractors and employees of such contractors who enter into contracts with an agency of USDA and who are considered to be employees of the agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552a(m)(1).

[40 FR 39519, Aug. 28, 1975, as amended at 62 FR 33982, June 24, 1997]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           The Halls: Web Series      

# The Halls: Web Series

Created by the Building Healthy Teen Relationships Initiative and the Defending Childhood Initiative at the Boston Public Health Commission, Division of Violence Prevention, The Halls is a web series featuring the stories of three young men living in Boston who are struggling with issues related to relationships, trauma, violence, and identity. The goal of the series is to prevent gender-based violence, promote healthy relationships among adolescents, and encourage young people to challenges the messages they have received about how to act in relationships. A discussion guide (PDF, 34 pages) is available on The Halls website which can help facilitators foster discussions around the themes of the series. 

http://www.bphc.org/whatwedo/violence-prevention/start-strong/Pages/THE-HALLS.aspx
(May 14, 1962)

#### In the Matter of Mark Daniel Roth.

Application for admission to the Bar denied. It appears from the record submitted that the applicant has not been “an actual resident of the State of New York for six months prior to the filing of his application for admission to practice ”, as required by rule (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 1, subd. [f], par. [3]; cf. *Matter of Horwitz,*276 App. Div. 918). This denial is without prejudice to a renewal of the application upon proof by the applicant of his compliance with the rule as to residence (see *Matter of Horwitz,*supra). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.