alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
873.105 Acquisition planning. ( a ) For the acquisition of health-care resources consisting of commercial services or the use of medical equipment or space where the acquisition is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT), an acquisition team must be assembled. The team shall be tailored by the contracting officer for each particular acquisition expected to exceed the SAT. The team should consist of a mix of staff, appropriate to the complexity of the acquisition, and may include fiscal, legal, administrative, and technical personnel, and such other expertise as necessary to assure a comprehensive acquisition plan. The team should include the small business advocate representing the contracting activity or a higher-level designee. At a minimum, the team must include the contracting officer and a representative of the Office of General Counsel and the requesting service. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( b ) The contracting officer or the acquisition team, as appropriate, must conduct market research, including satisfying the requirements of 808.002(a)(2) and 873.107, Socioeconomic programs, and a VA Rule of Two determination (819.502-2). It is the responsibility of the contracting officer to ensure the requirement is appropriately publicized and information about the procurement opportunity is adequately disseminated as set forth in 873.107. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
( c ) In lieu of the requirements of FAR part 7 addressing documentation of the acquisition plan, the contracting officer may conduct an acquisition strategy meeting with cognizant offices to seek approval for the proposed acquisition approach. If a meeting is conducted, briefing materials shall be presented to address the acquisition plan topics and structure in FAR 7.105. Formal written minutes—summarizing decisions, actions, and conclusions—shall be prepared and included in the contract file, along with a copy of the briefing materials. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 36 (Thursday, February 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 11537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04030]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Proposed Information Collection Activity; Sponsor Review 
Procedures for Unaccompanied Alien Children (OMB #0970-0278); 
Correction

AGENCY: Office of Refugee Resettlement, Administration for Children and 
Families, Department of Health and Human Services.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) published a document 
requesting public comment on proposed changes to its Family 
Reunification Application (also referred to as Sponsor Verification 
Application) and Sponsor Care Agreement. ORR is no longer pursuing 
changes to these forms and, therefore, withdraws its request for public 
comment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toby Biswas, Esq., 202-401-9246; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c594d4f5c6360656f754c6d6f6a2264647f226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d485c5e4d7271747e645d7c7e7b3375756e337a726b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ORR published the document in the 
Federal Register on January 5, 2021, at 86 FR 308.

Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-04030 Filed 2-23-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4184-45-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.17(B)



 Exhibit 10.17(b) 

First Amendment to the Frontier Airlines, Inc Credit Card Affinity Agreement 

This First Amendment to the Frontier Airlines Credit Card Affinity Agreement, made this 12th day of March 2003 by and between Juniper Bank
(“Juniper”) and Frontier Airlines, Inc (“Frontier”), amends the Frontier Airlines Credit Card Agreement between the parties dated March 12, 2003 (the “Agreement”). 

RECITALS: 
 The parties
desire to clarify the manner in which the Credit Card Program is administered. 
 THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	FRONTIER agrees to assign a full-time Marketing Coordinator to administer the Co-Branded Credit Card Program (job description attached hereto as Exhibit 1) hereinafter the
“Program Administrator”). 

  

	 	2.	JUNIPER shall pay Frontier monthly as provided on Exhibit 2 hereto, to offset FRONTIER’s expense associated with the Program Administrator, provided that in any month that the Program Administrator position is
unfilled for more than *****, JUNIPER shall have no obligation to pay FRONTIER for that month(s). FRONTIER will invoice JUNIPER on a *****. 

  

	 	3.	All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in effect except as expressly modified herein or in another writing signed by both parties. Capitalized terms shall have the same meaning as set forth in the
Agreement. 

  

	 	4.	This Amendment shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Delaware as applied to agreements among Delaware residents entered into and to be performed entirely within the State of Delaware.


  

	 	5.	This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 


Intending to be legally bound, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above. 

 

							
	JUNIPER BANK	  		 	FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC.	 	
				
	 [Unsigned]
	  		 	 [Unsigned]
	 	
	(Signature)	  		 	(Signature)	 	
				
	 [Unsigned]
	  		 	 [Unsigned]
	 	
	(Title)	  		 	(Title)	 	
				
	 [Undated]
	  		 	 [Undated]
	 	
	(Date)	  		 	(Date)	 	


  

	*****	Confidential portions of the material have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 



  
 1 








 EXHIBIT 1 

Job Description 

  

					
	PAGE 2	 		  	
	October 13, 2000	 		  	PROCESSING SERVICES AGREEMENT
		 	JUNIPER FINANCIAL CORP.	  	
	This document is confidential and proprietary and may not be distributed outside of Juniper Financial Crop. Or e-PROFILE,
Inc.









 EXHIBIT 2 

Payment Schedule 
 ***** 

  

	*****	Confidential portions of the material have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 



  
 3
Exhibit 32.2
                                 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Home Director, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, DARYL STEMM, the Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: June 6, 2007

/s/ Daryl Stemm
------------------------------
Daryl Stemm,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Exhibit 4.5

 

AMENDMENT NO. 2
 TO THE
 2014 INCENTIVE PLAN
 OF
 COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE TRUST INCORPORATED

 

November 1, 2016

 

The Compensation Committee of Community Healthcare Trust Incorporated, a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), does hereby approved and adopt the following Amendment No. 2 to the Corporation’s 2014 Incentive Plan (as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the 2014 Incentive Plan of the Corporation, the “Incentive Plan”), effective as of the date set forth above, pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation, as amended, of the Corporation, the Bylaws, as amended, of the Corporation and the Maryland General Corporation Law (the “MGCL”). All capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning as provided in the Incentive Plan.

 

FIRST, the Incentive Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 3.1 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

 

3.1. Number of Shares.  Subject to the following provisions of this Article 3, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to all Awards under the Plan shall be equal to seven percent (7%) of the total number of shares of Common Stock outstanding on December 31 of the immediately preceding year.  The shares of Common Stock to be delivered under the Plan will be made available from authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock or issued shares that have been reacquired by CHCT. To the extent that an Award becomes unrestricted or is forfeited, the shares of Common Stock covered thereby will no longer be charged against the foregoing maximum share limitations and may again be made subject to Awards under the Plan.  The maximum number of shares that may be awarded in any calendar year to an Eligible Person who is subject to the Code Section 162(m) compensation limit is one hundred and fifty thousand (150,000) shares.

 

SECOND, the Incentive Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 9.2 in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

 

9.2 Termination.  The Plan shall continue until terminated by the Board in its sole discretion or March 31, 2024. No termination of the Plan shall adversely affect any Award theretofore granted without the consent of the Participant or the permitted transferee of the Award.

 

THIRD, except as hereinabove amended, the Corporation’s Incentive Plan is to continue in full force and effect.
750.7108 Contractual requirements. Every contract modified pursuant to this subpart shall contain: ( a ) A citation of the Act and Executive Order 11223;
( b ) A brief statement of the circumstances justifying the action; and
( c ) With respect to cases falling within section 4 of Executive Order 11223, a statement that the action is necessary to protect the foreign policy interests of the United States.
[89 FR 4208, Jan. 23, 2024]
731.205-43 Trade, business, technical and professional activity costs—USAID conference approval requirements. ( a ) *Definitions.* As used in this section— *Conference* means a seminar, meeting, retreat, symposium, workshop, training activity or other such event that is funded in whole or in part by USAID.
*Net conference expense* means the total conference expenses excluding: any fees or revenue received by the Agency through the conference, costs to ensure the safety of attending governmental officials, and salary of USAID employees and USAID personal services contractors.
*Personal Services Contractor (PSC)* means any individual who is awarded a personal services contract in accordance with AIDAR appendix D or J of this chapter.
*Temporary duty (TDY) travel* means official travel at least fifty (50) miles from both the traveler's home and duty station for a period exceeding twelve (12) hours.
*USAID employee* means a USAID direct-hire employee or a direct-hire Federal employee from another U.S. government agency detailed to USAID.
( b ) *Prior approval.* USAID policy requires contractors to obtain contracting officer approval of the following, unless an exception in paragraph (c) of the clause at 752.231-72 applies: ( 1 ) A conference funded in whole, or in part, by USAID when ten (10) or more USAID employees or personal services contractors are required to travel on temporary duty status to attend the conference; or
( 2 ) A conference funded in whole, or in part, by USAID when the net conference expense funded by USAID is expected to exceed $100,000, regardless of the number of USAID employees or USAID personal services contractors who will participate in the conference.
( c ) *Allowability of cost.* Costs associated with a conference that meets the criteria above, incurred without USAID prior written approval, are unallowable.
( d ) *Solicitation provision and contract clause.* Contracting officers must insert the clause at 752.231-72 in all USAID-funded solicitations and contracts anticipated to include a requirement for a USAID-funded conference.
[88 FR 39192, June 15, 2023]
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10161 

To increase the penalty for prohibited provision of a phone in a correctional 

facility, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2024 

Ms. LEE of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To increase the penalty for prohibited provision of a phone 

in a correctional facility, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lieutenant Osvaldo 

5 Albarati Stopping Prison Contraband Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITED PROVISION OF A PHONE. 

7 Section 1791(b) of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 

10 paragraphs (5) and (6), respectively; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 10161 IH

1 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(4) in the case of a violation of subsection 

4 (a)(1), imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or 

5 both, if the object is specified in subsection 

6 (d)(1)(F) of this section;’’; and 

7 (3) in paragraph (5), as so redesignated, by in8 serting ‘‘, in the case of a violation of subsection 

9 (a)(2),’’ before ‘‘(d)(1)(F)’’. 

10 SEC. 3. REVIEW OF POLICIES. 

11 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

12 of this Act, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall— 

13 (1) conduct a review of the policies of the Bu14 reau of Prisons pertaining to inmates who make, 

15 possess, obtain, or attempt to make or obtain a pro16 hibited object, as defined in section 1791(d)(1) of 

17 title 18, United States Code; and 

18 (2) update those policies as needed to improve 

19 protections for incarcerated individuals and staff. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### 923.103 Contract clauses.

Insert the clause at 952.223-78, Sustainable Acquisition Program, or its Alternate I, in all contracts under which the contractor operates Government-owned facilities or Government-owned fleets or performs construction at a Government-owned facility. All such contracts should also include the following clauses: FAR 52.223-2, Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products under Service and Construction Contracts; FAR 52.223-10, Waste Reduction Program; FAR 52.223-XX, Compliance with Environmental Management Systems (see 923.903 regarding the applicability of this clause to specific DOE contracts); FAR 52.223-15, Energy Efficiency in Energy Consuming Products; and FAR 52.223-17, Affirmative Procurement of EPA-designated Items in Service and Construction Contracts.
#### In the Matter of Lisa Miller, Respondent, v Jonathan Smith, Appellant.

[775 NYS2d 900]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Shamahs, H.E.), dated June 13, 2002, which, after a hearing, directed him to pay the sum of $619.51 per month in child support and the sum of $311.83 per month toward child care, and (2) an order of the same court (Pearce, J.) dated November 22, 2002, which denied his objections to the order dated June 13, 2002.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 13, 2002, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated November 22, 2002; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated November 22, 2002, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the mother.

Family Court Act § 439 (e) provides that an aggrieved party’s specific written objections to the final order of support of the Hearing Examiner must be submitted within 35 days after the mailing of the order to such party. The Hearing Examiner’s order was mailed to the father on June 14, 2002. However, the father did not submit written objections to the Hearing Examiner’s order until July 22, 2002. Since the father’s written objections were not submitted until more than 35 days after the mailing of the Hearing Examiner’s order, the Family Court properly denied the objections on this ground (see *Matter of Zullo v Hom,*1 AD3d 442 [2003]; *Matter of Mayeri v*Mayeri, 279 AD2d 473 [2001]). The father’s contention on appeal regarding the date of mailing is based on matter dehors the record. H. Miller, J.P., Adams, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Coal deposits of Pike County,Kentucky
 
Report | Plates: 4647
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:876
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000964609
 
October 22, 2018**
Exhibit
23.1
   CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 The Board
of Directors
 Frontier
Financial Corporation
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Numbers
333-48805, 333-73217, 333-54362, 333-37242, 333-50882 and 333-136298 on Forms
S-8 of Frontier Financial Corporation, of our report dated February 29, 2008,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Frontier Financial
Corporation as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareowners’ equity and cash flows for the
three years ended December 31, 2007, and in our same report, with respect to
Frontier Financial Corporation, the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which is included in the annual report on Form 10-K of
Frontier Financial Corporation, for the year ended December 31,
2007.
 
 /s/ Moss
Adams LLP
 
 Everett,
Washington
 February
29, 2008
#### PEARSALL v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Diviion, Fourth Department.

March 28, 1906.)

letion by David A. Pearsall against the New fork Central & Hudson River Railroad Com->any.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order afirmed, with costs.

KRUSE, J.,

dissents, upon the ground that ividence of the meaning and application of the ule relating to junctions was improperly ex-luded.
EXHIBIT 10.25 


 


Prof. Dr. med. Oliver Wiedow, Forstweg
55, D-24105 Kiel, Germany


 


Kiel, on April 10th, 2017


 


Proteo, Inc.


Att:  Chief Executive Officer 



Ms. Birge Bargmann


2102 Business Center Drive


Irvine, CA 92612


USA


 



	 	Re: 	Elafin License Agreement 


 


Dear Ms. Bargmann,


 


This is to confirm certain agreements and
understandings reached between me and Proteo, Inc. in March 2017 based on the following background:


 


Pursuant to the provisions of the license
agreement between Proteo, Inc. (hereinafter “Licensee“) and myself (hereinafter “Licensor“; Licensee and
Licensor collectively the “Parties”) dated December 30th, 2000 as amended on December 23rd, 2008
(hereinafter the “License Agreement“), Licensee promised to pay an aggregate amount of 660,000 Euros in certain installments
to Licensor. In December 2007, December 2008 and February 2012, Licensee paid to Licensor 30,000 Euros per year and no other payments
were made under the License Agreement to Licensor as of June 10th, 2014. In December 2012, Licensor agreed in writing
to waive the non-payment defaults and agreed to defer the due dates of the payments for the outstanding balance of 570,000 Euro
with installments due on April 15, 2015 (330,000 €), on December 31, 2015 (120,000 €) and on December 31, 2016 (120,000
€). In June 2014, Dr. Wiedow agreed in writing to defer the due date of the payments for the outstanding balance of 570,000
Euro to April 2018.


 


I herewith confirm that based on the foregoing
we have agreed on the following in March 2017:


 


	 	1. 	The Parties herewith agree that Licensor defers to June 30, 2020 the total amount of 570,000 Euros  payable by Licensee, which otherwise would be due on April 30, 2018 (hereinafter the “Deferral”). 


 


	 	2. 	In the event that the Company's financial condition improves, the Parties would endeavor to enter in good faith negotiations to accelerate the payments. 


 


	 	3. 	Neither the Deferral under Section 1 hereof nor the willingness to negotiate accelerated payments as provided for in Section 2 hereof, would constitute a waiver of or estoppel to Licensor‘s rights to already existing or future payment obligations under the License Agreement. 


 


Please confirm by respective countersignature
that you are in agreement with this letter and with this confirmation of our agreement from March 2017.


 


Kind regards,


 


/s/ Oliver Wiedow 


Prof. Dr. med. Oliver Wiedow


 


 


We agree to the foregoing


 


Proteo, Inc., on April 10, 2017


 


/s/ Birge Bargmann 


Birge Bargmann, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10230 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10230

     To encourage the donation of menstrual products to nonprofit 
        organizations for distribution, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2024

   Ms. Meng (for herself, Ms. Barragan, Ms. Brownley, Ms. Bush, Mr. 
 Casten, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Crockett, Ms. Escobar, Mr. Evans, 
 Mr. Ruppersberger, Ms. Tokuda, Mr. Torres of New York, Ms. Velazquez, 
   and Mrs. Watson Coleman) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To encourage the donation of menstrual products to nonprofit 
        organizations for distribution, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Good Samaritan Menstrual Products 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES FROM DONATED MENSTRUAL 
              PRODUCTS.

    (a) Liability of Person, Manufacturer, or Distributor.--A person, 
manufacturer, or distributor shall not be subject to civil or criminal 
liability arising from the nature, age, packaging, or condition of 
apparently usable menstrual products that the person, manufacturer, or 
distributor donates in good faith to a nonprofit organization for 
ultimate distribution to individuals in need of such products.
    (b) Liability of Nonprofit Organization.--A nonprofit organization 
shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability arising from the 
nature, age, packaging, or condition of apparently usable menstrual 
products that the nonprofit organization received as a donation in good 
faith from a person, manufacturer, or distributor for ultimate 
distribution to individuals in need of such products.
    (c) Exception.--Subsections (a) and (b) do not apply to an act or 
omission of a person, manufacturer, distributor, or nonprofit 
organization, as applicable, constituting gross negligence or 
intentional misconduct that results in injury to or death of a user or 
recipient of the menstrual product.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    In this Act:
            (1) The term ``menstrual product'' means a sanitary napkin, 
        tampon, liner, cup, underwear, and any similar item used by an 
        individual with respect to menstruation.
            (2) The term ``apparently usable'' means, with respect to a 
        product, that the product meets all quality and labeling 
        standards imposed by Federal, State, and local laws and 
        regulations even if the product may not be readily marketable.
                                 <all>
```