alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 3, 2012 

Mr. Stuart A. Goldstein 

Counsel for The Liberty Foundation, Inc. 

Law Offices of Stuart A. Goldstein, P.A. 

9350 South Dixie Highway, 10th Floor 

Miami, FL 33156 

Dear Mr. Goldstein: 

This is in response to your February 28, 2012, letter (FAA Docket No. FAA-2004-17662) on 

behalf of The Liberty Foundation Inc. (Liberty), for an amendment to Exemption No. 8565, 

as amended. That exemption from §§ 91.315, 91.319(a)(2), 119.5(g), and 119.21(a) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) currently allows Liberty to operate a 

Boeing B-17 (B-17) (registration No. N390TH) and a Curtis P-40 (registration No. N2416X), 

to carry passengers for compensation or hire on local flights for educational and historical 

purposes. The amendment you request would allow you to operate a different B-17 

(N3703G, 44-83546-A) in place of the B-17 currently listed on your exemption. 

On March 23, 2011, the FAA issued a moratorium on the issuance of new Living History 

Flight Experience (LHFE) exemptions. A copy of the moratorium is enclosed for your 

information. 

This moratorium provides the FAA a needed opportunity to reevaluate the LHFE policy and 

the conditions of issuance of these exemptions. The evolution of LHFE operations in the 

private sector, along with availability of newer and more capable former military aircraft, has 

raised public safety and public policy concerns that the FAA needs to assess. 

Current LHFE exemption holders can continue to operate under their current exemption. If 

the exemption is due to expire during the moratorium, the FAA will accept and process 

petitions to extend current exemptions in accordance with the established regulatory 

exemption processes. If a change is required (i.e. removal of an aircraft) the FAA will accept 

these changes in accordance with the regulatory processes. Additionally, during the 

moratorium, as petitioners request extensions to their LHFE exemption, the FAA will add the 

following clarifying limitations to all LHFE exemptions to ensure consistent application of 

current LHFE policy: 
2

1. Passengers are prohibited from manipulating the aircraft flight controls when the 

aircraft is operated under the LHFE exemption; and 

2. No aerobatics may be performed in the aircraft while operating under the LHFE 

exemption. 

Finally, the FAA will begin its evaluation of the current LHFE exemption policies and 

practices, to include evaluation of safety to the paying members of the public who have an 

expectation of aircraft safety and who may not understand the inherent risks associated with 

such flight. The FAA expects to publish a new proposed LHFE policy for comment on or 

before September 30, 2012. 

No new LHFE exemptions will be issued during this moratorium nor will any aircraft be 

added to existing exemptions. Accordingly, no further action will be taken on your petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure
623.506 Suspension of payments, termination of contract, and debarment and suspension actions. ( e ) The authority to approve the determination prescribed in FAR 23.506(e) is reserved to the Secretary of State.
[55 FR 5775, Feb. 16, 1990, as amended at 81 FR 24707, Apr. 27, 2016]
#### 852.271-75 [Reserved]
#### Frederick Schlosser, Respondent, v Mary A. Schlosser, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 870]

*778In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated April 19, 2002, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), dated March 24, 2003, as, after a hearing, granted that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was to modify the visitation provisions set forth in a stipulation of settlement dated December 5, 2001, which was incorporated but not merged into the judgment of divorce, and, in effect, denied her cross motion, inter alia, for updated forensics, chemical hair analysis, and attendance reports from substance abuse programs.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In adjudicating custody and visitation rights, the most important factor to be considered is the best interests of the children in view of all the circumstances *(see Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer,*55 NY2d 89, 95-6 [1982]). Deference is generally accorded to the court’s findings of fact because it was in the best position to assess the credibility of the witnesses *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 173 [1982]). Thus, its findings may not be set aside or modified unless they lack a sound and substantial basis in the record *(see Matter of Darlene T.,*28 NY2d 391, 395 [1971]; *Matter of Khan v Khan,*236 AD2d 612, 613 [1997]; *McDonald v McDonald,*216 AD2d 276, 277 [1995]).

Pursuant to the terms of the parties’ stipulation of settlement, the plaintiff was entitled to move for unsupervised visitation if he complied with certain conditions. The plaintiff complied with the conditions and the defendant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances which would relieve her of the terms of the stipulation of settlement *(see Weiss v Weiss,*52 NY2d 170, 175 [1981]; *Matter of Michael F. v Cerise S.,*224 AD2d 692, 693 [1996]; *Coniglio v Coniglio,*170 AD2d 477 [1991]). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly determined that unsupervised visitation by the father with the parties’ children was appropriate.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Smith, J.P., H. Miller, S. Miller and Luciano, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,116
<INVENTORY>                                     78,799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,475
<PP&E>                                          77,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,002
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,097
<BONDS>                                        124,248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,401
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           189
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   304,898
<SALES>                                        193,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,216
<CGS>                                          128,662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,508
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   358
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,458
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,227
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
806.102 Use of competitive procedures. ( d ) ( 3 ) Awards made using General Services Administration (GSA) or Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Federal Supply Schedules (FSS) are considered competitive when awarded in accordance with the procedures specified in FAR part 8 and this part.
#### 852.271-73 Use and Publication of Counseling Results.

As prescribed in 871.211, insert the following clause:

# Use and Publication of Counseling Results (NOV 2021)

The Contractor agrees that none of the information or data gathered in connection with the services specified in this contract, or studies or materials based thereon or relating thereto, will be publicized without the prior approval of the Under Secretary for Benefits or his/her designee.

(End of clause)

[86 FR 54406, Oct. 1, 2021]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Share with Youth: Educational Opportunities for a Career in Cybersecurity      

# Share with Youth: Educational Opportunities for a Career in Cybersecurity

This website describes multiple opportunities for K-12, two-year community college, undergraduate, graduate, and post-graduate students interested in pursuing a career in cybersecurity. 

http://niccs.us-cert.gov/education/promoting-education?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
#### Emma A. Shea et al., Respondents, v. City *of*Cohoes et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

Defendant appeals from a preliminary injunction granted in favor of the plaintiff taxpayer. Order affirmed. We do not reach the merits. We leave to a plenary trial the determination of the important ultimate question in the case. *(Elishewitz & Sons*v. *Barry Equity Corp.,*280 App. Div. 336, 338, mot. for lv. to app. den. 280 App. Div. 915; *Metzger Co.*v. *Fay,*4 A D 2d 436, 439, mot. for rearg. or lv. to app. den. 4 A D 2d 861.) However, the terms of the injunction are not to apply to any act of the council for or against the express approval of the agreement arising out of the resolution of January 21, 1965. Either party may apply to the administrative Judge for the purpose of setting a date for trial. In the event a prompt trial is not held as the result of any delay or hindrance on the part of the plaintiffs, the city may move to vacate the preliminary injunction. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum *Per Curiam.*
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10554 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress annual reports 

on medical malpractice claims by members of the uniformed services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2024 

Ms. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress 

annual reports on medical malpractice claims by members of the uniformed services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pentagon Medical Mal5 practice Claims Reporting Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORTS ON MEDICAL MALPRACTICE 

7 CLAIMS BY MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED 

8 SERVICES. 

9 Subsection (i) of section 2733a of title 10, United 

10 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 10554 IH

1 ‘‘(i) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Not less frequently than 

2 annually until 2028, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 

3 to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

4 the House of Representatives a report on claims processed 

5 under this section that includes, with respect to the period 

6 covered by the report, the following: 

7 ‘‘(1) The number of claims processed under this 

8 section. 

9 ‘‘(2) The average timeline for resolving such 

10 claims. 

11 ‘‘(3) The resolution of each such claim. 

12 ‘‘(4) The number of claims that were denied 

13 based on the claim not meeting one or more require14 ment specified in subsection (b) (other than for not 

15 being substantiated pursuant to paragraph (6)), 

16 disaggregated by each such requirement. 

17 ‘‘(5) Any other information that the Secretary 

18 determines may enhance the effectiveness of the 

19 claims process under this section.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         167,427
<SECURITIES>                                     1,432
<RECEIVABLES>                                  353,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,319
<INVENTORY>                                    451,013
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,006,026
<PP&E>                                         871,323
<DEPRECIATION>                                 197,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,802,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          676,078
<BONDS>                                        795,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     263,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,802,204
<SALES>                                      3,275,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,286,630
<CGS>                                        2,899,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,112,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                       420
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             80,155
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,155
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1853

BRUCE E. LANE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL W. WYNNE, Secretary of the Air Force;

LOCAL UNION 1092, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge.

(8:04-cv-01051-PJM)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 20, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce E. Lane, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Mark D. Roth,

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, Washington,

D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Bruce E. Lane appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lane v. Wynne,

No. 8:04-cv-01051-PJM (D. Md. June 26, 2006). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
817.7003 Policy. Undefinitized contract actions shall— ( a ) Be used only when— ( 1 ) The negotiation of a definitive contract action is not possible in sufficient time to meet the Government's requirements; and
( 2 ) The Government's interest demands that the contractor be given a binding commitment so that contract performance can begin immediately.
( b ) Be as complete and definite as practicable.
908.7107 Procurement and use of industrial alcohol. ( a ) This section covers the procurement of industrial alcohol by DOE or authorized contractors and the applicable policies and delegations of authority to submit industrial alcohol user application to procure and use tax-free alcohol or specially denatured spirits. To the fullest extent practicable, industrial alcohol for use by DOE or its contractors shall be procured on a tax-free basis.
( b ) The procurement of tax-free alcohol or specially denatured spirits shall be conducted in accordance with the regulations, policy, and procedures of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB), of the Department of Treasury. The applicable TTB regulations and forms may be accessed at the following Web site: *http://www.ttb.gov/foia/err.shtml#regulations .* For further information, contact the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Director, National Revenue Center, 550 Main St., Suite 8002, Cincinnati, OH 45202-5215 or toll free at 1-877-882-3277.
( c ) The applying office should coordinate, as necessary, with the local State Alcohol Control Board, or its equivalent, to obtain the appropriate State license. ( 1 ) *Tax-free alcohol.* TTB regulations relating to the procurement and use of alcohol free of tax, by Government agencies, are set forth in 27 CFR part 22, subpart N, §§ 22.171 to 22.176.
( 2 ) *Specially denatured spirits.* TTB regulations relating to the acquisition and use of alcohol free of tax, by Government agencies, are set forth in 27 CFR part 20, subpart N, §§ 20.241 to 20.245.
( d ) For the user permits to procure and use tax-free alcohol and specially denatured spirits submit the application on the TTB Form 5150.22, “Application for Industrial Alcohol User Permit,” (or the current TTB form). When permits are no longer required, they should be forwarded to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau for cancellation. Industrial alcohol procured by use of the TTB form referred to in this subsection shall be used exclusively on DOE work.
( e ) The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) has the authority to sign the TTB application, Form 5150.22. The SPE may delegate this authority to sign the application to specifically named DOE personnel. Requests for new authorizations or changes to existing authorizations shall be submitted by letter to the SPE. A copy of the TTB approved permit shall be sent to the SPE.
( f ) Abandoned and forfeited alcohol which has come into the custody or control of a Federal agency may be obtained by following the procedure set forth in the FMR at 41 CFR part 102-41.
[76 FR 7691, Feb. 11, 2011]
POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned directors of
Electronic Sensor Technology, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Corporation"),
hereby constitute and appoint Teong C. Lim and Philip Yee, and each of them, the
true and lawful agents and attorneys-in-fact of the undersigned, with full power
and authority in said agents and attorneys-in-fact, and in either or both of
them, to sign for the undersigned and in their respective names as directors of
the Corporation the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 on
Form 10-K to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission,
Washington, D.C., under the Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, and any amendment
or amendments to such Annual Report, and the undersigned ratify and confirm all
acts taken by such agents and attorneys-in-fact, or either or both of them, as
herein authorized. This Power of Attorney may be executed in one or more
counterparts.


Date: February 20, 2009                  By: /s/ Teong C. Lim
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Teong C. Lim, Chairman of the Board


Date: February 16, 2009                  By: /s/ Thomas Dudley
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Thomas Dudley, Director


Date: February __, 2009                  By:
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Lewis Larson, Director


Date: February 17, 2009                  By: /s/ Low Gay Teck
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Low Gay Teck, Director


Date: March 11, 2009                     By: /s/ Maggie Tham
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Maggie Tham, Director


Date: March 11, 2009                     By: /s/ William Wittemeyer
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             William Wittmeyer, Director
#### 970.0808 Acquisition of printing and related supplies.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1032 

To amend title 1, United States Code, to provide for a definition of the 

term ‘‘State’’ and to include territories therein, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Ms. PLASKETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 1, United States Code, to provide for a 

definition of the term ‘‘State’’ and to include territories 

therein, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THE TERM ‘‘STATE’’ TO INCLUDE TERRITORIES 

4 FOR PURPOSES OF FEDERAL LAW. 

5 (a) THE TERM ‘‘STATE’’ TO INCLUDE TERRI6 TORIES.—Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘§ 9. Rule of construction regarding the term ‘State’ 

9 ‘‘In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, 

10 or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the varVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:21 Mar 07, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1032.IH H1032

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1032 IH

1 ious administrative bureaus and agencies of the United 

2 States, the term ‘State’ shall include any territory of the 

3 United States, unless the statute, rule, regulation, or in4 terpretation explicitly excludes the territories from the def5 inition of the term or otherwise precludes their inclusion.’’. 

6 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

7 for such chapter is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 

‘‘9. Rule of construction regarding the term ‘State’.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS