alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

 

In connection with the Form 10-K of Tri-Valley Corporation for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, I, F. Lynn Blystone, Chief Executive Officer of Tri-Valley Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. **§** 1350 as adopted pursuant to **§** 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

|   | (1) | Such Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  Tri-Valley Corporation. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| Date:

 

  | August 10, 2009                                                        |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:                   | */s/F. Lynn Blystone***                                                |
|                  | F. Lynn Blystone, Chief Executive Officer CHOB

Tri-Valley Corporation |
#### In the Matter of City of New York, Appellant, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property, Within the Block Bounded by West 134th Street, and Other Streets in the Borough of Manhattan, as a Site for Public School 92, and Recreational Purposes. Bersir Realty Corp. et al., Respondents.

Final decree appealed from insofar as it makes awards for six damage parcels, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reducing the award made for Damage Parcels 16-17 to the sum of $21,000 and, as so modified, is otherwise affirmed, with $50 costs to the respondents in the appeals on Damage Parcels 7, 8, 9, 11, 13 and 21, and to the appellant on the appeal on Damage Parcels 16-17, and without costs in the appeal on Damage Parcel 25, the respondent having filed no brief. 'We modify the decree only to the extent of reducing the award made for Damage Parcels 16-17 from $27,000 to $21,000. We reach this reduced amount by utilizing the capitalization method of computation— the method adopted by claimant’s expert. We credit the claimant with the highest amount of gross income allowable on this parcel, namely, $5,900. As against that we also give it the benefit of expenses at the lowest figure testified to, namely, $4,000. That would leave a net income of $1,900 to be capitalized. Applying the capitalization rate as testified to by claimant’s expert, namely, 6% on the land and 13% on the building, we arrive at the figure of $21,000. That is the maximum that should be allowed for these parcels. With respect to the other parcels involved on this appeal, the appellant has failed to show in what respect, if any, the trial court was in error in arriving at the final result. Consequently, we affirm those determinations. We note that there were no findings made by Special Term which would indicate how it arrived at its results. It would be most desirable if, in making condemnation awards, the court make findings setting forth the bases upon which it relies. If, for example, the capitalization method be used, the court should set forth its findings with respect to the different factors that it considered in arriving at the final amount to be paid. Among these would be the gross income, the total expenses chargeable to income and the rate of capitalization. Such findings would make for a sounder basis for appellate review. Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Stener, JJ.
Filed 7/18/13 P. v. England CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. RODNEY ENGLAND, Defendant and Appellant. D062869

(Super. Ct. No. SCN302455)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Kimberlee A. Lagotta, Judge. Affirmed. Beatrice C. Tillman for Defendant and Appellant. No Appearance for the Plai ntiff and Respondent.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION On March 5, 2012, Rodney England pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance (Health and Saf. Code, § 11350, su bd. (a)), and the court granted him probation

under Penal Code section 1210. At an August 2012 hearing, the court declin ed England's request to remain in drug treatment after summarizing his failures to co mplete drug treatment. The court stated:2 "Seventy two hours [after E ngland pleaded guilty to the dr ug violation] he failed to appear at probation. First court appearance, [Apr il 4, 2012]. He failed to appear in court. Warrant goes out. He is here on [May 2, 2 012]. He admits first [drug rehabilitation violation] for those two violations. [I] order him to probation again. By [an unclear date in 2012] he fails to appear. Next court appearance [June 20, 2012]. He fails to appear. [¶] At this point in time I don't believe him to be amenable for treatment. He has made absolutely no efforts; not even showing up when he is supp ose[d] to." The court ruled, "I am terminating him from treatment at this time. I don't belie ve he would qualify for drug court because of his gang status." The court sentenced England to two years in state prison. England appeals. We

affirm. Appointed counsel has file d a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal but as ks that this court review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to a possible but not arguable issue of

whether the trial court abused its discre tion by denying Engla nd reinstatement of probation under Penal Code section 1210.1, and senten cing him to state prison. We granted England permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded. Our review of the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende , supra , 25

Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California , supra , 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issue referred to by appellate counsel, has disclose d no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Competent counsel has represen ted England on this appeal.3 DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed.

O'ROURKE, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

BENKE, J.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Mental Health Matters, Why Black Dad’s Positive Mental Health Is Good for Youth Academic Outcomes      

# Resource: Mental Health Matters, Why Black Dad’s Positive Mental Health Is Good for Youth Academic Outcomes

This brief, the second in a series of three from Fathers Incorporated addressing fatherhood engagement for low-income African American students and their families, is designed for academicians and practitioners to focus continued attention on recognizing a father's mental health and its impact on how well his child does in school. **Learn more.**
#### 252.237-7011 Preparation history.

As prescribed in 237.7003(a) and (a)(8), use the following clause:

# Preparation History (DEC 1991)

For each body prepared, or for each casket handled in a group interment, the Contractor shall state briefly the results of the embalming process on a certificate furnished by the Contracting Officer.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 36479, July 31, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 3416, Jan. 23, 2006; 84 FR 48505, Sept. 13, 2019]
#### § 1.120 Fees.

Any agency which provides copies of records pursuant to a request under this subpart may charge fees for the direct costs of producing such copies in accordance with appendix A to subpart A of this part. No agency, however, shall charge any fee for searches necessary to locate records. Nor shall an agency charge any fees for copies or searches, when the requester sought to make a personal inspection but was provided copies instead at the discretion of the agency.
Exhibit 32-8

              Certificate Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
                          Title 18 United States Code

         The undersigned officer hereby certifies, as to the Quarterly Report on
     Form 10-Q of Exelon Generation Company, LLC for the quarterly period ended
     September 30, 2003, that (i) the report fully complies with the
     requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934, and (ii) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Exelon Generation Company, LLC.


     Date:  October 29, 2003                  /s/ Robert S. Shapard
                                              ---------------------
                                              Robert S. Shapard
                                              Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              Exelon Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         755,434
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  612,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,370,369
<PP&E>                                       3,308,054
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,061,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,484,077
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,312
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,061,826
<SALES>                                        385,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               401,293
<CGS>                                          132,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               505,145
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,934
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (300,492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (300,492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (300,492)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### 970.3501-2 Using an FFRDC.

The contractor may only accept work from a non-sponsor (as defined in 48 CFR 35.017) in accordance with the requirements of DOE Order 481.1C, Strategic Partnership Projects (Formerly Known as Work for Others (Non-Department of Energy Funded Work)), or successor version.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000, as amended at 74 FR 36373, July 22, 2009; 80 FR 15519, Mar. 24, 2015]
#### 252.208-7000 Intent to furnish precious metals as Government-furnished material.

As prescribed in 208.7305(a), use the following clause:

# Intent To Furnish Precious Metals as Government-Furnished Material (DEC 1991)

(a) The Government intends to furnish precious metals required in the manufacture of items to be delivered under the contract if the Contracting Officer determines it to be in the Government's best interest. The use of Government-furnished silver is mandatory when the quantity required is one hundred troy ounces or more. The precious metal(s) will be furnished pursuant to the Government Furnished Property clause of the contract.

(b) The Offeror shall cite the type (silver, gold, platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium, and ruthenium) and quantity in whole troy ounces of precious metals required in the performance of this contract (including precious metals required for any first article or production sample), and shall specify the national stock number (NSN) and nomenclature, if known, of the deliverable item requiring precious metals.

| Precious metal\* | Quantity | Deliverable item (NSN and nomenclature)!!rs |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \*If platinum or palladium, specify whether sponge or granules are required. | | |

(c) Offerors shall submit two prices for each deliverable item which contains precious metals—one based on the Government furnishing precious metals, and one based on the Contractor furnishing precious metals. Award will be made on the basis which is in the best interest of the Government.

(d) The Contractor agrees to insert this clause, including this [paragraph (d)](/on/2024-09-16/title-48/section-252.208-7000#p-252.208-7000(d)), in solicitations for subcontracts and purchase orders issued in performance of this contract, unless the Contractor knows that the item being purchased contains no precious metals.

(End of clause)
P

EORIA

LakePleasant

RegionalPark

!"c$

?Â

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

Sheep

Mountain

ACEC

HellsCanyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

RiverCanyon

Wilderness

Tule

Creek

ACEC

Hieroglyphic

MountainsSRMA

LakePleasant/

AguaFriaSCRMA

BureauofLandManagement

PhoenixDistrictOffice

Phoenix,AZ

October2006

Note:TheBureauofLandManagement(BLM)

conductslanduseplanningonlyintheareasadministered

byBLM.BLMhasnoplanningauthorityunderthe

municipalorcountyplanninglegislationoftheState

ofArizona.

NowarrantyismadebyBLMfortheuseofthismap

forpurposesnotintendedbyBLM,ortotheaccuracy,

reliabilityorcompletenessoftheinformationshown.

SpatialinformationmaynotmeetNationalMapAccuracy

standards.Thisinformationmaybeupdatedwithout

notification.

±

Note:LandStatuslegendlocatedonMap1-1

Map2-48

CastleHotSprings

ManagementUnit

MultipleResourceAllocation&

SpecialAreaDesignation

AlternativeC

01234

Miles

BLMWilderness

USFSWilderness

Interstate

MajorRoad

MajorRiver,StreamsorWash

Highway

AguaFriaNational

MonumentPlanningArea

BradshawHarquahala

PlanningArea

ManagementUnit

ResourceAllocations

SpecialAreaDesignation

SpecialRecreation

ManagementArea

SpecialCulturalResource

ManagementArea

(SCRMA)-PublicUse

AreaofCritical

EnvironmentalConcern

(ACEC)

CountyBoundary

WildernessCharacteristics
Exhibit
10.5


 


DEBT
SATISFACTION AGREEMENT (“AGREEMENT”) ENTERED INTO BY AND BETWEEN ENTEST BIOMEDICAL, INC. (“DEBTOR”) AND
SHERMAN FAMILY TRUST (“CREDITOR”) DATEDvMAY 25, 2017.


 


WHEREAS,
As of MAY 25, 2017 , DEBTOR is indebted to CREDITOR in the principal amount of $199,000.


WHEREAS
DEBTOR wishes to accept equity securities of CREDITOR in satisfaction of $199,000 of the total principal debt due to DEBTOR
from CREDITOR (“Settlement Debt”)


 


THEREFORE,
It is agreed as follows:


		1.	STOCK
                                         IN SATISFACTION OF SETTLEMENT DEBT. On or before , May 31 2017 CREDITOR will issue to
                                         DEBTOR 199,000 newly issued shares of the CREDITOR’s Non Voting Convertible Preferred
                                         Stock in full satisfaction of the Settlement Debt.



		2.	ENTIRE
                                         AGREEMENT. This instrument contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect
                                         to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any prior agreements of the parties with
                                         respect to the subject matter hereof. It may be changed only by an agreement in writing
                                         signed by a party against whom enforcement of any waiver, change, modification, extension
                                         or discharge is sought.



		3.	GOVERNING
                                         LAW AND VENUE. Each party hereby irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of
                                         the state and federal courts sitting in California for the adjudication of any dispute
                                         hereunder or in connection herewith or with any transaction contemplated hereby or discussed
                                         herein and hereby irrevocably waives, and agrees not to assert in any suit, action or
                                         proceeding, any claim that it is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of any such
                                         court, that such suit, action or proceeding is improper or inconvenient venue for such
                                         proceeding. If either party shall commence an action or proceeding to enforce any provisions
                                         of this Agreement, then the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be reimbursed
                                         by the other party for its attorneys’ fees and other costs and expenses incurred
                                         with the investigation, preparation and prosecution of such action or proceeding.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


 


	Creditor:
    Sherman Family Trust	Debtor:
    Entest Biomadical, Inc.
	By:
    /s/Timothy G. Foat	By:/s/
    David Koos
	Its:
    Trustee	Its:
    Chairman and CEO
	Date:
    May 25, 2017	Date:
    May 25, 2017
#### POTH, Appellant, v. COMMERCIAL ADVERTISER ASS’N, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

March 23, 1906.)

Action by William J. Poth against the Commercial Advertiser Association.

J. A. Douglas, for appellant.

H. Taylor, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
#### 552.211-90 Small Parts.

As prescribed in 511.204(b)(9), insert the following clause:

# Small Parts (JAN 2010)

All small parts required to be furnished with machines covered by contracts resulting from this solicitation shall be packed in envelopes, sealed, identified with part numbers and quantity on outside of envelopes. Larger parts must be individually tagged and identified with part number on face of tag.

(End of clause)

[74 FR 66255, Dec. 15, 2009, as amended at 86 FR 55523, Oct. 6, 2021]
#### 9904.417-20 Purpose.

The purpose of this Cost Accounting Standard is to establish criteria for the measurement of the cost of money attributable to capital assets under construction, fabrication, or development as an element of the cost of those assets. Consistent application of these criteria will improve cost measurement by providing for recognition of cost of contractor investment in assets under construction, and will provide greater uniformity in accounting for asset acquisition costs.
#### 951.7002 Responsibilities.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 952.251-70, Contractor employee travel discounts, in all cost-reimbursable solicitations and contracts when significant costs for rail travel, car rental, or lodging will be required to perform the contract. The contracting officer may furnish the contractor with appropriate identification letters.

[65 FR 81007, Dec. 22, 2000]
9904.410-40 Fundamental requirement. ( a ) Business unit G&A expenses shall be grouped in a separate indirect cost pool which shall be allocated only to final cost objectives.
( b ) ( 1 ) The G&A expense pool of a business unit for a cost accounting period shall be allocated to final cost objectives of that cost accounting period by means of a cost input base representing the total activity of the business unit except as provided in subparagraph (b)(2) of this subsection. The cost input base selected shall be the one which best represents the total activity of a typical cost accounting period.
( 2 ) The allocation of the G&A expense pool to any particular final cost objectives which receive benefits significantly different from the benefits accruing to other final cost objectives shall be determined by special allocation (9904.410-50(j)).
( c ) Home office expenses received by a segment shall be allocated to segment cost objectives as required by 9904.410-50(g).
( d ) Any costs which do not satisfy the definition of G&A expense but which have been classified by a business unit as G&A expenses, can remain in the G&A expense pool unless they can be allocated to business unit cost objectives on a beneficial or causal relationship which is best measured by a base other than a cost input base.