alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10395 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10395

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish and carry out 
a pilot program to furnish a headstone or burial marker to veterans who 
      died on or before November 1, 1990, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 12, 2024

 Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish and carry out 
a pilot program to furnish a headstone or burial marker to veterans who 
      died on or before November 1, 1990, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honoring Our Heroes Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PILOT PROGRAM TO FURNISH 
              HEADSTONES AND BURIAL MARKERS TO COVERED VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, acting through 
the Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs, shall establish and carry out 
a pilot program under which the Secretary shall furnish, when 
requested, an appropriate headstone or burial marker for the purpose of 
commemorating a covered veteran.
    (b) Applications.--An individual desiring to request a headstone or 
marker for the purpose of commemorating a covered veteran under such 
pilot program shall submit to the Secretary an application in such 
time, in such form, and containing such information and assurances as 
the Secretary considers appropriate.
    (c) Update to Eligibility Requirements.--During the period the 
authority to carry out the pilot program under this section is 
effective, the Under Secretary shall update the internet website of the 
National Cemetery Administration with respect to the requirements for 
eligibility for a headstone or burial marker under the laws 
administered by the Secretary.
    (d) Termination Date.--The authority of the Secretary to carry out 
the pilot program under this section shall terminate on the date that 
is two years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (e) Covered Veteran Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
veteran'' means a veteran (as defined in section 101 of title 38, 
United States Code) who died on or before November 1, 1990.
                                 <all>
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Assessing Whether Your Community Has Achieved the Goal of Ending Youth Homelessness      

# Resource: Assessing Whether Your Community Has Achieved the Goal of Ending Youth Homelessness

This resource (PDF, 4 pages) includes questions that can help communities assess their progress toward USICH’s benchmarks for reaching the goal of ending youth homelessness. 

http://www.usich.gov/resources/uploads/asset_library/Youth_Questions_to_Assess_02_2017.pdf?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
From: Seidel, Teresa (DNRE)

To: Adams, Lucy H.

Subject: FW: Modern Hard Chrome Test Report

Date: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 8:38:12 AM

Attachments: Modern Hard Chrome Tank #15 Stack Test.pdf

Teresa Seidel

Air Quality Division

Acting Field Operations Supervisor

Lansing 517-373-7037

Warren - 586-753-3730

Detroit - 313-456-4680

"Solution is possible where acceptance is ready."

 - Pearl S Buck

From: Reed, Krista (DNRE) 

Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 8:32 AM

To: Seidel, Teresa (DNRE)

Subject: Modern Hard Chrome Test Report

Attached is a stack test report for Modern Hard Chrome’s Tank #15.

Krista Reed

Environmental Quality Analyst

Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment

Air Quality Division

Southeast Michigan District

(586)753-3764

From: Seidel, Teresa (DNRE) 

Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:24 AM

To: DEQ-AQD-Field

Cc: Fiedler, Lynn (DNRE); Fiedler, David (DNRE)

Subject:

RTI on behalf of EPA is looking for actual stack test data from sources subject the

NESHAP for Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing

Tanks, Subpart N.

We cannot query MACES for this information (It's on the list to be fixed). If you are

aware of a facility who has conducted this test please let me know ASAP and then

send a copy of the report to me in the Lansing office. 

Thanks Everyone,

Teresa

Teresa Seidel
Air Quality Division

Acting Field Operations Supervisor

Lansing 517-373-7037

Warren - 586-753-3730

Detroit - 313-456-4680

"Solution is possible where acceptance is ready."

 - Pearl S Buck
#### 752.7025 Approvals.

For use in all USAID contracts.

# Approvals (APR 1984)

All approvals required to be given under the contract by the contracting officer or the Mission Director shall be in writing and, except when extraordinary circumstances make it impracticable, shall be requested by the Contractor sufficiently in advance of the contemplated action to permit approval, disapproval or other disposition prior to that action. If, because of existing conditions, it is impossible to obtain prior written approval, the approving official may, at his discretion, ratify the action after the fact.

(End of clause)

[49 FR 13259, Apr. 3, 1984, as amended at 79 FR 74988, Dec. 16, 2014; 89 FR 4209, Jan. 23, 2024]
#### 828.106 Administration.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of PCS Edventures!.com , Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), We, Anthony A. Maher, President and CEO, and Shannon M. Wilson, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    Date:June 26, 2007By:/s/Anthony A. MaherAnthony A. MaherPresident and CEO  DateJune 26, 2007By:/s/Shannon M. WilsonShannon M. WilsonVP and CFO
#### 652.219-72 Department of State Mentor-Protégé Program.

As prescribed in 619.202-70(o)(1), insert the following provision:

# Department of State Mentor-Protégé Program (APR 2004)

(a) Large and small businesses are encouraged to participate in the Department of State Mentor-Protégé Program. Mentor firms provide eligible small business protégés with developmental assistance to enhance their business capabilities and ability to obtain Federal contracts.

(b) Mentor firms are large prime contractors or eligible small businesses capable of providing developmental assistance. Protégé firms are small businesses, as defined in 13 CFR parts 121, 124, and 126.

(c) Developmental assistance is technical, managerial, financial, and other mutually beneficial assistance that aids protégés. Firms interested in participating in the program are encouraged to contact the Department of State OSDBU for further information.

(End of provision)

[69 FR 19338, Apr. 13, 2004]
In the matterof adopting the Interstate Transport Analysis for the Fine Particulate Matter, Nitrogen Dioxide, Lead, and Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards and aBART Order Revision for the BP Cherry Point Refinery into the Washington State Implementation Plan

SIP ADOPTION ORDER The Washington State Department ofEcology (Ecology) offered the public an opportunity

to review and request

a hearing onthe following revisions
tothe State Implementation Plan (SIP): 1 .Interstate Transport SIP Revision for the 2006 24-hour Fine Particulate Matter (PM2

.s) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). 2 .Interstate Transport SIP Revision for the 2010 1-hour Nitrogen Dioxide (N02), 2008 3- Month Rolling Average Lead (Pb) NAAQS, and 2008 8-hour Ozone (03) NAAQS. 3. Revised BART Order for BP Cherry Point Refinery to include in Washington's Regional Haze SIP. We did not receive

a requesttohold
a public hearing. We accepted comments from March 9, 2015, through AprillO, 2015. No comments werereceived. Ecology metall stateand federal procedural requirements for public outreach by taking the following actions: •Held
a mandatory 60-day consultation with the Federal Land Managers onthe BART Order revision from August 5, 2014 through October
3, 2014

.We received no comments. •Published

a legal notice announcing the public review and comment period in one newspaperonMarch 9, 2015. This allowed Ecology
tomeetthe requirement for 30 days of advance hearing notice. •Announced the public comment period and public hearing date onouronline public involvement calendar and Ecology's website. •Provided an opportunity for the public to request

a hearing by April 1, 20 15. We did not receive

a request for a hearing, sowedid nothold one,asallowed by 40 CFR Section 51.102 and WAC 173-400-171 "Public Involvement." IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the referenced documents, constituting the revisions, are approved and adopted by the Depru1ment
of Ecology as partof the Washington State Implementation Plan. All provisions of the Washington State Implementation Plan inconsistent with the attached documents are superseded. 1lia1u

.**--** Maia D. Bellon, Director Department
of Ecology s-/a lis Date T

1
Douglas Cherry 

Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). Accordingly, we 

conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

arraguirre 

cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court 

Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge 

Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders 

Marquis Aurbach Coffing 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A e 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Carol Denise RICHARDSON; Eskico Truman Garner, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 06-20569

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 7, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

John Riley Friesell, Bellaire, TX, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Following a jury trial, DefendanL-Appellant Carol Denise Richardson was found guilty of one count of conspiring to possess crack cocaine with intent to distribute and two counts of possessing crack cocaine with intent to distribute. The district court sentenced her to serve life in prison. Eskico Truman Garner was found guilty of one count of conspiring to possess crack *387cocaine with intent to distribute and five counts of possessing crack cocaine with intent to distribute. The district court sentenced him to serve 405 months in prison. Richardson and Garner both appeal them sentences. Richardson argues that her life sentence is improper because it was based on facts concerning her prior convictions that were neither admitted by her nor found by a jury. This argument is foreclosed. *See Harris v. United States,*536 U.S. 545, 565, 122 S.Ct. 2406, 153 L.Ed.2d 524 (2002); *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Garner argues that the district court erred by determining that he was a leader of the offense and by sentencing him in accordance with this finding. The record shows, inter alia, that Garner conducted drug transactions, manufactured crack cocaine, and directed the actions of other individuals who were involved with the offense. The record also shows that at least five people were involved with the offense. In light of these facts, the district court’s determination that Garner was a leader of the offense is plausible. The district court’s imposition of the disputed adjustment thus is not clearly erroneous. *See United States v. Villanueva,*408 F.3d 193, 204 (5th Cir.2005); *United States v. Cooper,*274 F.3d 230, 238 (5th Cir.2001). Garner’s challenge to the presumption of reasonableness afforded to a sentence that falls within the pertinent guidelines range is foreclosed. *See Rita v. United States,*-U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007).

Richardson and Garner have shown no error. Consequently, the judgments of the district court are

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cut. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### 570.303 Solicitation for offers.
#### 936.202-71 Specifications.

When developing specifications for the work to be performed, plan for ways to ensure that construction and demolition debris can be diverted or recycled in sufficient quantities as to ensure that the Agency goal from section 2(e) of Executive Order 13514 of diverting at least 50% of the debris stream may be attained.

[75 FR 57693, Sept. 22, 2010]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           HHS Awards $256.6 Million for Equitable and Affordable Title X Family Planning Services Nationwide      

# HHS Awards $256.6 Million for Equitable and Affordable Title X Family Planning Services Nationwide

OPA awarded $256.6 million in funding to support 76 grantees to deliver equitable, affordable, client-centered, and high-quality family planning services. These grants will restore access to Title X services nationwide and fill service gaps caused by more than a quarter of Title X providers withdrawing from the program over the past two and a half years. **Learn more.**
815.370-2 Promote competition. Except as provided in 815.370-4, if only one offer is received when competitive procedures were used and the solicitation allowed fewer than 30 days for receipt of proposals, the contracting officer should— ( a ) Consult with the requiring activity as to whether the requirements document should be revised in order to promote more competition (see FAR 6.502(b) and 11.002); and
( b ) Consider re-soliciting, allowing an additional period of at least 30 days for receipt of proposals.
[84 FR 46452, Sept. 4, 2019]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Attachment Behaviors in Children with Incarcerated Fathers      

# Resource: Attachment Behaviors in Children with Incarcerated Fathers

This podcast, created by the Institute for Research on Poverty, describes a new study on attachment in children who have an incarcerated father and discusses some of the factors that may lead to differences in children’s attachment behaviors. 

http://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/media/podcasts/PC57-2017-August.mp3?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resources
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

President (Principal Executive Officer)

February 4, 2009
#### 970.3102-05-70 Preexisting conditions.

Clause 970.5231-4, Preexisting conditions, provides guidance on situations where this category of costs may be allowable.

[65 FR 81009, Dec. 22, 2000. Redesignated at 67 FR 14873, Mar. 28, 2002; 74 FR 36373, July 22, 2009]
#### 7.107-6 Solicitation provision.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.207-6, Solicitation of Offers from Small Business Concerns and Small Business Teaming Arrangements or Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award Contracts), in solicitations for multiple-award contracts above the substantial bundling threshold of the agency (see 7.107-4(a)).

[81 FR 67770, Sept. 30, 2016]
46 So.2d 302

#### STATE v. BROWN.

No. 39824.

April 24, 1950.

France W. Watts, Jr., Franklinton, 'for defendant-appellant.

Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jas. T. Burns, Dist. Atty., Covington, for plaintiff-appellee.

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

Jelthor Brown, in prosecuting this appeal from his conviction and sentence on a charge of negligent homicide, contends that *379the trial judge erred in allowing Ray E. Pope, who was one-half mile from the scene of the accident, to testify over his objection that when the accused passed him the accused was driving at a “very noticeably high rate of speed”; and also when the trial judge refused to give the special charge to the jury that “Criminal negligence is the greatest type of negligence known to the law. It is more than a rashly negligent, careless, and heedless act”; and in refusing his motion for a new trial based on these two alleged errors.

The first alleged error complained of is without merit. According to the per curiam of the trial judge, the defendant, who was in a hurry to get to Bogalusa to make' a purchase before a certain store closed, was driving very fast, and Pope’s testimony was in corroboration of that of several other witnesses who had already testified to the same effect. This testimony was clearly admissible. The fact that the witness was approximately % mile from the scene goes to the effect and weight to be given to the evidence rather than to its incompetency, as claimed by the accused. Moreover, the defendant was not prejudiced by the admission of such evidence since he took the stand and admitted that he was driving SO miles an hour at the time.

The second alleged error complained of is equally without merit. The trial judge properly charged the jury on criminal negligence as defined in the Criminal Code.

The motion for a new trial based on these two alleged errors presents nothing for further consideration.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction, and sentence are affirmed.