10922 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 23, 2021 / Notices 

15See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 

Reviews). 

16See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

17See Order. 

18See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

19See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

20See generally 19 CFR 351.303. 

21See 19 CFR 351.303(f). 

22See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

23See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

24See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; and 19 CFR 

351.213(h). 

dumping margin is zero or de minimis 

in the final results of review, we will 

instruct CBP not to assess duties on any 

of its entries in accordance with the 

Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., 

‘‘{w}here the weighted-average margin 

of dumping for the exporter is 

determined to be zero or de minimis, no 

antidumping duties will be assessed.’’ 15

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by NSC and 

Tokyo Steel for which the producer did 

not know its merchandise was destined 

for the United States, or for any 

respondent for which we have a final 

determination of no shipments, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediate company (or 

companies) involved in the 

transaction.16

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of the 

notice of final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash 

deposit rate for each specific company 

listed above will be that established in 

the final results of this review, except if 

the rate is less than 0.50 percent, and 

therefore de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for previously investigated 

companies not participating in this 

review, the cash deposit will continue 

to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which the company participated; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, or the underlying investigation, 

but the manufacturer is, then the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate established 

for the most recent segment for the 

manufacturer of the merchandise; and 

(4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

manufacturers or exporters will 

continue to be 5.58 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation.17 These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed for these preliminary results 

of review to interested parties within 

five days of the date of publication of 

this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.309(c), interested parties may 

submit case briefs no later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice. Rebuttal briefs, the content of 

which is limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed no later than 

seven days after the date for filing case 

briefs.18 Parties who submit case briefs 

or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.19 Case and 

rebuttal briefs should be filed using 

ACCESS 20 and must be served on 

interested parties.21 Executive 

summaries should be limited to five 

pages total, including footnotes. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS. An electronically filed request 

must be received successfully in its 

entirety by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

within 30 days of the date of publication 

of this notice.22 Requests should 

contain: (1) The party’s name, address 

and telephone number; (2) the number 

of participants; and (3) a list of issues 

parties intend to discuss. If a request for 

a hearing is made, Commerce intends to 

hold the hearing at a date and time to 

be determined.23 Parties should confirm 

the date, time, and location of the 

hearing two days before the scheduled 

date. 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

the issues raised in any case or rebuttal 

briefs, no later than 120 days after the 

date of publication of this notice, unless 

extended.24

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 17, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

V. Use of Facts Available and Adverse Facts 

Available 

VI. Rates for Non-Examined Companies 

VII. Discussion of the Methodology 

VIII. Currency Conversion 

IX. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2021–03648 Filed 2–22–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–878, A–580–881, C–580–879, C–580– 

882] 

Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

and Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products From the Republic of Korea: 

Final Results of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Changed 

Circumstances Reviews 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) continues to find that that 

KG Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. (KG Dongbu 

Steel) is the successor-in-interest to 

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 23, 2021 / Notices 10923 

1See Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products and 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the 

Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty and Countervailing Duty Changed 

Circumstances Reviews, 86 FR 287 (January 5, 2021) 

(Preliminary Results). 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 

3014 (January 17, 2020) (Initiation Notice). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational 

Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 

2020. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel 

Flat Products from Australia: Extension of Deadline 

for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2018–2019,’’ dated 

September 21, 2020. 

5See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from 

Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the 

Netherlands, the Republic of Turkey, and the 

United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the 

Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Turkey and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 (October 3, 

2016) (Order). 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Hot Rolled Steel Flat 

Products from Australia: 2018–2019,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. (Dongbu Steel) 

and Dongbu Incheon Steel Co., Ltd. 

(Dongbu Incheon) for purposes of 

determining antidumping duty (AD) 

cash deposits and liabilities pursuant to 

the AD orders on certain cold-rolled 

steel flat products (cold-rolled steel) and 

certain corrosion-resistant steel 

products (CORE) from the Republic of 

Korea (Korea). Additionally, Commerce 

continues to find KG Dongbu Steel is 

not the successor-in-interest to Dongbu 

Steel and Dongbu Incheon for purposes 

of countervailing duty (CVD) cash 

deposits and liabilities pursuant to the 

CVD orders on cold-rolled steel and 

CORE, because there was a significant 

change in ownership and operations 

that could have affected the nature and 

extent of the countervailable subsidies 

attributable to KG Dongbu Steel. 

DATES: Applicable February 23, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joshua A. DeMoss, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3362. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 5, 2021, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

changed circumstances reviews (CCRs) 

of the AD and CVD orders on coldrolled steel and CORE from Korea.1 In 

the Preliminary Results, interested 

parties were provided an opportunity to 

comment and request a public hearing 

regarding our preliminary findings. We 

received no comments from interested 

parties, nor was a public hearing 

requested. 

Scope of the Orders 

The products covered by these CCRs 

are cold-rolled steel and CORE from 

Korea. For full descriptions of the scope 

of the orders, see the Preliminary 

Results and accompanying Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Final Results of the Changed 

Circumstances Reviews 

For the reasons stated in the 

Preliminary Results, and because we 

received no comments from interested 

parties, Commerce continues to find 

that KG Dongbu Steel is the successorin-interest to Dongbu Steel and Dongbu 

Incheon for AD purposes. As a result of 

this determination, we find it 

appropriate to apply to KG Dongbu Steel 

AD cash deposits requirements and 

liabilities at the rates currently in effect 

for Dongbu Steel/Dongbu Incheon. For 

CVD purposes, we continue to find that 

changes in ownership and management 

were significant and, thus, that it is not 

appropriate to apply the CVD cash 

deposit requirements and liabilities 

currently in effect for Dongbu Steel/ 

Dongbu Incheon to KG Dongbu Steel. 

Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection to suspend 

liquidation of all shipments of subject 

merchandise produced or exported by 

KG Dongbu Steel and entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of this notice in the Federal 

Register at the current antidumping 

duty cash-deposit rate on cold-rolled 

steel and CORE in effect for Dongbu 

Steel/Dongbu Incheon. This cash 

deposit requirement shall remain in 

effect until further notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.216(b), 351.221(b) and 

351.221(c)(3). 

Dated: February 17, 2021. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2021–03619 Filed 2–22–21; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–602–809] 

Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 

From Australia: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Intent To Rescind Review, 

in Part; 2018–2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) preliminarily finds that the 

producer/exporter subject to this review 

made sales of subject merchandise at 

less than normal value during the 

period of review (POR), October 1, 2018, 

through September 30, 2019. We invite 

interested parties to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable February 23, 2021. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Allison Hollander, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2805. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 17, 2020, Commerce 

initiated this administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

hot-rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled 

steel) from Australia in accordance with 

section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act).1 This review 

covers one producer/exporter of subject 

merchandise, the collapsed entity, 

BlueScope Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd., 

BlueScope Steel Ltd., and BlueScope 

Steel Distribution Pty Ltd. (collectively, 

BlueScope). On April 24, 2020, 

Commerce exercised its discretion to 

toll all deadlines for administrative 

reviews by 50 days, resulting in a 

revised deadline for these preliminary 

results.2 On July 21, 2020, Commerce 

again tolled all deadlines in 

administrative reviews by an additional 

60 days.3 Additionally, Commerce 

exercised its discretion to extend the 

deadline for the preliminary results 

until February 17, 2021.4

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by this Order 5

are certain hot-rolled, flat-rolled steel 

products. For a full description of the 

scope, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.6

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act. Constructed export price is