alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

##  More Collaboration Profiles

## Breadcrumb

            -  Collaboration Profiles 
            -  Project U-Turn 
            -           Project U-Turn      

# Project U-Turn

Resources

**Learn more about Project U-Turn:**
                      - Mobilizing a Cross-sector Collaborative for Systematic Change: Lessons from Project U-Turn, Philadelphia’s Campaign to Reduce the Dropout Rate (PDF, 13 pages)
                      - New Research on the Relationships Between Philadelphians’ Educational Attainment and Their Employment, Earnings and Contributions to Government and Society (PDF, 4 pages)
                      - Project U-Turn@ 2.5: Broadening and Deepening the Work (PDF, 8 pages)
                      - Unfulfilled Promise: The Dimensions and Characteristics of Philadelphia's Drop-out Crisis, 2000-2005 (PDF, 50 pages)
                      - Turning it Around: A Collective Effort to Understand and Resolve Philadelphia's Drop-out	Crisis (PDF, 26 pages)

## Main navigation

- Overview
- Collaboration Purpose
- About the Collaboration
- Collaboration Structure
- Best Practices
- Lessons Learned
- Resources
- Download PDF

## Help Spread the Word About youth.gov

Get a Web Badge
##### 



EXHIBIT
10.6
 
 LEASE
AGREEMENT
 
       1.
    
    TERM: July 15, 2001 (assuming LESSOR can prepare said facility
      and remove/re-locate existing storage products currently on-site or in
      non-compliance with the Building and Planning Department for the City of
      Pocatello, said removal time frame has been previously agreed as to
      90 days) through July 14, 2006, with an option to renew for the
      next five (5) years thereafter.2.
    
    SECURITY DEPOSIT:




---



##### 



th th
   th th th th




---



##### 








---



##### 



EARLY TERMINATION




---



##### 



1.
    
    Failure to make lease payments within thirty days of due
  date.2.
    
    Failure to comply with provisions of the lease.3.
    
    Sub-letting or Sub-leasing of the occupancy without outside of
      provisions set forth in the lease agreement.4.
    
    Abandonment of occupancy: defined, although not exclusively, as any
      one or combination of the following; failure to occupy the occupancy for
      fourteen ( 14 ) consecutive days or more, significant deterioration to the
      premises, termination of utility services, or other identifiable indicia
      of abandonment.




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



1.
    
    This lease is binding is limited to the parties hereto.2.
    
    This agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and merges
      any prior oral agreements between the parties concerning the same subject
      matter. This document shall not be modified except in writing as mutually
      agreed by both parties.
  /s/ Fred J Parrish
    
    
    
    4/6/01Fred J Parrish, authorized
      agent for
    
    
    
    DateParrish Reality, Inc.
      LESSOR/s/ Mark Terry
    
    
    
    4/6/01Mark Terry, authorized
      agent for
    
    
    
    DateAqua King Seafood
      LESSEE
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DANIEL SALINAS-VARGAS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-50557

D.C. No. 3:06-cr-00639-WQH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013** 

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

Daniel Salinas-Vargas appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the eight-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Salinas-Vargas contends that the revocation sentence was substantively

FILED

JUN 24 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-50557

unreasonable because the district court failed to weigh properly the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(e) sentencing factors. The district court did not abuse its discretion in

imposing Salinas-Vargas’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51

(2007). In light of the totality of the circumstances and the section 3583(e)

sentencing factors, the below-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable. See

id.; United States v. Gutierrez-Sanchez, 587 F.3d 904, 908 (9th Cir. 2009) (“The

weight to be given the various factors in a particular case is for the discretion of the

district court.”).

Salinas-Vargas also contends that the supervised release revocation

procedure under section 3583 violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000). As he concedes, this contention is foreclosed by United States v. Santana,

526 F.3d 1257, 1262 (9th Cir. 2008), and United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445

F.3d 1220, 1223-25 (9th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.
46.203 Criteria for use of contract quality requirements. The extent of contract quality requirements, including contractor inspection, required under a contract shall usually be based upon the classification of the contract item (supply or service) as determined by its technical description, its complexity, and the criticality of its application. ( a ) *Technical description.* Contract items may be technically classified as— ( 1 ) Commercial (described in commercial catalogs, drawings, or industrial standards; see part 2); or
( 2 ) Military-Federal (described in Government drawings and specifications).
( b ) *Complexity.* ( 1 ) Complex items have quality characteristics, not wholly visible in the end item, for which contractual conformance must be established progressively through precise measurements, tests, and controls applied during purchasing, manufacturing, performance, assembly, and functional operation either as an individual item or in conjunction with other items.
( 2 ) Noncomplex items have quality characteristics for which simple measurement and test of the end item are sufficient to determine conformance to contract requirements.
( c ) *Criticality.* ( 1 ) A critical application of an item is one in which the failure of the item could injure personnel or jeopardize a vital agency mission. A critical item may be either peculiar, meaning it has only one application, or common, meaning it has multiple applications.
( 2 ) A noncritical application is any other application. Noncritical items may also be either peculiar or common.
[48 FR 42415, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 48249, Sept. 18, 1995]
917.7401 General. The acquisition of real estate requires the involvement of a DOE Certified Realty Specialist, as specified at 917.7402. Special circumstances and situations may arise under cost-type contracts when, in the performance of the contract or subcontract, the performer shall be required, or otherwise find it necessary, to acquire real estate or interests therein by: ( a ) Purchase, on DOE's behalf or in its own name, with title eventually vesting in the Government.
( b ) Lease for which DOE will reimburse the contractor for the pre-approved costs incurred under the lease.
( c ) Acquisition of temporary interest through easement, license or permit, and DOE funds the cost of the temporary interest.
[61 FR 41707, Aug. 9, 1996, as amended at 76 FR 7693, Feb. 11, 2011]
#### 873.118 Debriefings.

Offerors whose proposals are not accepted under a competitive request for proposals (RFP) may submit a written request for a debriefing to the contracting officer. Without regard to FAR 15.505, preaward debriefings may be conducted by the contracting officer when determined to be in the best interest of the Government. Post-award debriefings shall be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.506. (38 U.S.C. 8153)
Exhibit 32.1   Suncrest Global Energy Corp.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Suncrest Global Energy Corp. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  1. the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  September 24, 2007/s/ John W. Peters
John W. Peters
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Shih-Jye Cheng, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of ChipMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theperiod covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 20, 2017
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Disability Employment 101      

# Disability Employment 101

The Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services within the Department of Education has released and updated its *Disability Employment 101*guide. This guide provides information about hiring employees with disabilities, including information about how to find qualified workers with disabilities, how to put disability and employment research into practice, and how to model what other businesses have done to successfully integrate individuals with disabilities into the workforce.

http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/products/employmentguide/disabilityemployment101.pdf
6106.612 Streamlined procedures [Rule 612]. The Board encourages parties to focus on providing only the information a panel needs to resolve an eligibility or repayment dispute. Examples of streamlining may include without limitation— ( a ) Electing not to supplement the materials already provided to FEMA, if (or to the extent) the existing record adequately frames the dispute;
( b ) Relying when possible on documents over other types of evidence;
( c ) Simplifying live hearings by efiling in advance written testimony, reports, or opening statements by some witnesses or party representatives;
( d ) Refraining from objecting to evidence without good cause; and
( e ) Omitting duplicative and immaterial evidence and arguments.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of VillageEDOCS (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


               Date: September 7, 2006          /s/ K. Mason Conner
                     -----------------          ------------------------------
                                                Chief Executive Officer


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO VILLAGEEDOCS AND WILL BE RETAINED
BY VILLAGEEDOCS AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS
STAFF UPON REQUEST.
# C_2020108EN.01000101.xml

| 1.4.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

31 March 2020

(2020/C 108/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0956 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,90 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4674 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88643 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0613 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0585 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 155,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 11,5100 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,312 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 360,02 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5506 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8283 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,2063 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7967 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5617 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4945 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8417 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5633 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 341,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,6095 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7784 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6255 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 869,24 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7330 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,865 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,9486 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,925 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,7001 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 26,1772 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,8985 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0956

JPY

Japanese yen

118,90

DKK

Danish krone

7,4674

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88643

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0613

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0585

ISK

Iceland króna

155,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

11,5100

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,312

HUF

Hungarian forint

360,02

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5506

RON

Romanian leu

4,8283

TRY

Turkish lira

7,2063

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7967

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5617

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4945

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8417

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5633

KRW

South Korean won

1 341,03

ZAR

South African rand

19,6095

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7784

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6255

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 869,24

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7330

PHP

Philippine peso

55,865

RUB

Russian rouble

85,9486

THB

Thai baht

35,925

BRL

Brazilian real

5,7001

MXN

Mexican peso

26,1772

INR

Indian rupee

82,8985

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
9.304 Exceptions. Normally, testing and approval is not required in contracts for— ( a ) Research or development;
( b ) Products requiring qualification before award (e.g., when an applicable qualified products list exists (see subpart 9.2));
( c ) Products normally sold in the commercial market; or
( d ) Products covered by complete and detailed technical specifications, unless the requirements are so novel or exacting that it is questionable whether the products would meet the requirements without testing and approval.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vermont Pure Holdings,
Ltd. (the "Company") for the year ended October 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best
knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


/s/ Peter K. Baker
-------------------------------------
Peter K. Baker
Chief Executive Officer

Date: January 30, 2006
#### 952.216-15 Predetermined indirect cost rates.

*Alternate* (AUG 2009): As prescribed in 916.307(g), modify paragraph (c) of the clause at 48 CFR 52.216-15, Predetermined Indirect Cost Rates, by deleting the words “Subpart 31.4” and substituting for them “Subpart 31.6” and insert the clause in solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement research and development contract with a State or local government is contemplated and predetermined indirect cost rates are to be used.

[49 FR 12042, Mar. 28, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9109, Feb. 25, 1994; 62 FR 2312, Jan. 16, 1997; 74 FR 36369, July 22, 2009; 76 FR 7694, Feb. 11, 2011]