Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 59 / Friday, March 27, 2015 / Notices 16381 

TABLE—REGISTRATION REVIEW DRAFT RISK ASSESSMENTS

Registration review case name and No. Pesticide docket ID No. Chemical review manager, telephone number, 

and email address 

Propoxycarbazone-sodium (Case 7264) .............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0095 ........ Lata Venkateshwara, (703) 308–2722, 

Venkateshwara.lata@epa.gov 

Propoxycarbazone-sodium (Draft Risk 

Assessments). The registration review 

docket for propoxycarbazone-sodium 

(EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0095) is opening 

for public comment on the Preliminary 

Work Plan (PWP), the combined 

summary document and draft human 

health risk assessment, and the 

combined problem formulation and 

draft ecological risk assessment. 

Propoxycarbazone-sodium is a selective 

post-emergence herbicide belonging to 

the sulfonamide class of herbicides. It is 

formulated as a water dispersible 

granule, and is currently registered for 

use in control of certain grasses and 

broadleaf weeds in wheat, triticale, 

pastureland, rangeland, and 

conservation reserve program. There are 

no registered residential uses. EPA has 

completed comprehensive draft human 

health and draft ecological risk 

assessments for all propoxycarbazonesodium uses. 

1. Other related information. 

Additional information on 

propoxycarbazone-sodium is available 

on the Pesticide Registration Review 

Status Web page for this pesticide, 

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/chemical

search/. Information on the Agency’s 

registration review program and its 

implementing regulation is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registra

tion_review. 

2. Information submission 

requirements. Anyone may submit data 

or information in response to this 

document. To be considered during a 

pesticide’s registration review, the 

submitted data or information must 

meet the following requirements: 

• To ensure that EPA will consider 

data or information submitted, 

interested persons must submit the data 

or information during the comment 

period. The Agency may, at its 

discretion, consider data or information 

submitted at a later date. 

• The data or information submitted 

must be presented in a legible and 

useable form. For example, an English 

translation must accompany any 

material that is not in English and a 

written transcript must accompany any 

information submitted as an 

audiographic or videographic record. 

Written material may be submitted in 

paper or electronic form. 

• Submitters must clearly identify the 

source of any submitted data or 

information. 

• Submitters may request the Agency 

to reconsider data or information that 

the Agency rejected in a previous 

review. However, submitters must 

explain why they believe the Agency 

should reconsider the data or 

information in the pesticide’s 

registration review. 

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the 

registration review docket for each 

pesticide case will remain publicly 

accessible through the duration of the 

registration review process; that is, until 

all actions required in the final decision 

on the registration review case have 

been completed. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: March 13, 2015. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06939 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0060; FRL–9923–74] 

Registration Review Interim Decisions; 

Notice of Availability 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

availability of EPA’s final/interim 

registration review decisions for several 

pesticide cases. Registration review is 

EPA’s periodic review of pesticide 

registrations to ensure that each 

pesticide continues to satisfy the 

statutory standard for registration, that 

is, that the pesticide can perform its 

intended function without causing 

unreasonable adverse effects on human 

health or the environment. Through this 

program, EPA is ensuring that each 

pesticide’s registration is based on 

current scientific and other knowledge, 

including its effects on human health 

and the environment. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For pesticide specific information, 

contact: The Chemical Review Manager 

for the pesticide of interest identified in 

the table in Unit II.A. 

For general information on the 

registration review program, contact: 

Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 308–8015; email address: 

dumas.richard@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, farm 

worker, and agricultural advocates; the 

chemical industry; pesticide users; and 

members of the public interested in the 

sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. 

Since others also may be interested, the 

Agency has not attempted to describe all 

the specific entities that may be affected 

by this action. If you have any questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

to a particular entity, consult the 

pesticide specific contact person listed 

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

B. How can I get copies of this document 

and other related information? 

The docket for this action, identified 

by docket identification (ID) number 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0060, is available 

at http://www.regulations.gov or at the 

Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 

Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. What action is the Agency taking? 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), this 

notice announces the availability of 

EPA’s interim registration review 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

16382 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 59 / Friday, March 27, 2015 / Notices 

decision for fluazinam (case 7013), 

flumetsulam (case 7229), flutolanil (case 

7010), hexaflumuron (case 7413), iron 

salts (case 4058), piperalin (case 3114), 

quinclorac (case 7222) and triflumizole 

(case 7003). 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.57, a 

registration review decision is the 

Agency’s determination whether a 

pesticide meets, or does not meet, the 

standard for registration in FIFRA. EPA 

has such a determination for the cases 

listed in the table below. The interim 

registration review decisions for each 

case are found in the respective 

pesticide dockets. Information in the 

dockets describes the Agency’s rationale 

for issuing each interim decision for 

fluazinam (case 7013), flumetsulam 

(case 7229), flutolanil (case 7010), 

hexaflumuron (case 7413), iron salts 

(case 4058), piperalin (case 3114), 

quinclorac (case 7222), and triflumizole 

(case 7003), EPA has considered the 

following chemicals/cases in light of the 

FIFRA standard for registration: 

Fluazinam (case 7013), flumetsulam 

(case 7229), flutolanil (case 7010), 

hexaflumuron (case 7413), iron salts 

(case 4058), piperalin (case 3114), 

quinclorac (case 7222), and triflumizole 

(case 7003), the Interim Decision 

documents in the docket describe the 

Agency’s rationale for issuing a 

registration review final/interim 

decision for each of these pesticides. 

In addition to the interim registration 

review decision document, the 

registration review docket for fluazinam, 

flumetsulam, flutolanil, hexaflumuron, 

iron salts, piperalin, quinclorac, and 

triflumizole also includes other relevant 

documents related to the registration 

review of these cases. The proposed 

interim registration review decisions 

were posted to the docket and the 

public was invited to submit any 

comments or new information. 

TABLE—REGISTRATION REVIEW INTERIM DECISIONS

Registration review case name and 

No. Pesticide Docket ID No. Chemical Review Manager, telephone number, email address 

Fluazinam (case 7013) .................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0039 ....... Lata Venkateshwara, (703) 308–2722, venkateshwara.lata@epa.gov. 

Flumetsulam (case 7229) ................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0625 ....... Katherine St. Clair, (703) 347–8778, stclair.katherine@epa.gov. 

Flutolanil (case 7010) ...................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0148 ....... Garland Waleko, (703) 308–8049, waleko.garland@epa.gov. 

Hexaflumuron (case 7413) .............. EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0568 ....... Ricardo Jones, (703) 347–0493, jones.ricardo@epa.gov. 

Iron salts (case 4058) ...................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0626 ....... Katherine St. Clair, (703) 347–8778, stclair.katherine@epa.gov. 

Piperalin (case 3114) ....................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0483 ....... Matthew Manupella, (703) 347–0411, manupella.matthew@epa.gov. 

Quinclorac (case 7222) ................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1135 ....... Margaret Hathaway, (703) 305–5076, hathaway.margaret@epa.gov. 

Triflumizole (case 7003) .................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0115 ....... Steven Snyderman, (703) 347–0249, snyderman.steven@epa.gov. 

Fluazinam. Interim Decision (EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2009–0039). The registration 

review docket for fluazinam (EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2009–0039) opened in a notice 

published in the Federal Register of 

September 23, 2009 (74 FR 48559) 

(FRL–8434–6). Fluazinam is a contact 

fungicide of the pyridinamine class 

registered for agricultural use on a 

variety of crops, including peanuts, 

potatoes, and beans. EPA conducted a 

human health risk assessment and did 

not identify any risks of concern. In 

addition, EPA conducted an 

environmental fate and effects risk 

assessment. Based on low-risk 

estimates, and the conservative nature 

of the risk assessment, the Agency has 

determined that fluazinam use does not 

pose unreasonable risks to the 

environment from currently registered 

uses of fluazinam. The Agency is not 

proposing mitigation changes at this 

time. EPA published an interim 

proposed registration review decision in 

the Federal Register on September 24, 

2014 (79 FR 57084) (FRL–9916–39). 

Two comments were received on the 

proposed interim decision, which did 

not change the conclusions of the 

decision. At this time in registration 

review, it is premature to make an 

endangered species effects 

determination for federally listed 

species and their designated critical 

habitats under the Endangered Species 

Act (ESA). Fluazinam has also not been 

evaluated under the Endocrine 

Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP). 

Therefore, the Agency’s final 

registration review decision is 

dependent upon the results of the 

evaluation of risks to threatened and 

endangered species and of potential 

endocrine disruptor risk. Pending the 

outcome of these actions, EPA is issuing 

an interim registration review decision 

for fluazinam at this time. 

Flumetsulam. Interim Decision (EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2008–0625). Flumetsulam has 

been registered as a pesticide in the 

United States since 1985, and is 

currently registered for use as an 

herbicide for control of broadleaf weeds 

in field corn and soybeans. 

Flumetsulam is registered only for 

agricultural uses; there are no registered 

residential or public recreational uses of 

flumetsulam. EPA conducted a human 

health risk assessment and did not 

identify any risks of concern. No human 

health mitigation is being undertaken 

for flumetsulam at this time by the 

Agency. The Agency also conducted an 

ecological risk assessment for existing 

flumetsulam uses listed above. For 

existing uses, risks of concern were 

identified for listed and non-listed 

aquatic and terrestrial plant species 

from the use of flumetsulam on corn 

and soybeans. Listed aquatic and 

terrestrial animals may also be affected 

through indirect effects because of the 

potential effects on listed and non-listed 

aquatic and terrestrial plant species. 

EPA published a proposed interim 

registration review decision for 

flumetsulam in the Federal Register on 

September 24, 2014 (79 FR 57084) 

(FRL–9916–39). The document includes 

various label changes to mitigate risks to 

non-target plants by reducing spray 

drift. Comments from three stakeholders 

were received on the proposed interim 

decision; these comments did not 

change the conclusions of the decision 

or the proposed mitigation to address 

ecological risks. At this time in 

registration review, it is premature to 

make an endangered species effects 

determination for federally listed 

species and their designated critical 

habitats under the ESA. Also, 

flumetsulam has not yet been evaluated 

under the EDSP. Therefore, the 

Agency’s final registration review 

decision is dependent upon the results 

of the evaluation of risks to threatened 

and endangered species and of potential 

endocrine disruptor risk. Pending the 

outcome of these actions, EPA is issuing 

an interim registration review decision 

for flumetsulam at this time. 

Flutolanil. Interim Decision (EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2008–0148). Flutolanil is a 

systemic benzanilide fungicide first 

registered by EPA in 1993, used to 

control fungal diseases in both food 

crops (peanuts, potatoes, rice) and nonfood sites (turf, greenhouse, field-grown 

and potted ornamentals). Flutolanil has 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 59 / Friday, March 27, 2015 / Notices 16383 

both protective and curative activity. 

EPA completed a qualitative draft 

human health risk assessment for all 

flutolanil uses and for proposed label 

amendments for brassica (cole) leafy 

vegetables (Crop Group 5), turnip 

greens, rice, turf, and peanuts. No risks 

of concern were identified. The Agency 

also conducted an ecological risk 

assessment for existing and proposed 

uses listed above. For existing uses, 

risks of concern were identified for 

freshwater fish and estuarine/marine 

invertebrates in the water column and 

sediment, and for terrestrial dicots and 

aquatic non-vascular plants for some 

uses. EPA published an interim 

proposed registration review decision in 

the Federal Register on September 24, 

2014. One comment was received on the 

proposed interim decision, which did 

not change the conclusions of the 

decision or the proposed mitigation to 

address risks to aquatic organisms. At 

this time in registration review, it is 

premature to make an endangered 

species effects determination for 

federally listed species and their 

designated critical habitats under the 

ESA. Flutolanil has also not been 

evaluated under the EDSP. Therefore, 

the Agency’s final registration review 

decision is dependent upon the results 

of the evaluation of risks to threatened 

and endangered species and of potential 

endocrine disruptor risk. Pending the 

outcome of these actions, EPA is issuing 

an interim registration review decision 

for flutolanil at this time. 

Hexaflumuron. Interim Decision 

(EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0568). 

Hexaflumuron is an insecticide/

termiticide applied in above- and 

below-ground termite bait systems, and 

is intended to be used near commercial, 

recreational or residential structures. 

EPA completed a qualitative human 

health risk assessment and no risks of 

concern were identified. The Agency 

also conducted an ecological risk 

assessment and determined that 

hexaflumuron does not pose 

unreasonable risk to the environment. 

The Agency has made an endangered 

species effects determination of ‘‘no 

effects’’ for aquatic organisms and a 

determination of ‘‘no habitat 

modification’’ to all designated critical 

habitats under the ESA. EPA published 

an interim proposed registration review 

decision for hexaflumuron in the 

Federal Register on September 24, 2014. 

Hexaflumuron has not been evaluated 

under EDSP. Therefore, the Agency’s 

final registration review decision is 

dependent on the result of the Section 

7 Endangered Species consultation with 

the Fish and Wildlife Service, and the 

potential endocrine disruptor risk. 

Pending the outcome of these actions, 

EPA is issuing an interim registration 

review decision for hexaflumuron at 

this time. 

Iron Salts. Interim Decision (EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2008–0626). The iron salts 

registration review case includes two 

active chemicals, ferric sulfate and 

ferrous sulfate monohydrate. Iron is the 

fourth most abundant element and the 

second most abundant metal in the 

earth’s crustal rocks. Iron occurs in a 

wide variety of minerals, and it is 

present in foods naturally and through 

added ingredients. Iron salts are 

herbicides registered for use on outdoor 

lawns and ornamentals to control 

mosses in a variety of residential and 

commercial areas. There are no 

registered agricultural uses of iron salts 

products. EPA conducted a human 

health risk assessment and did not 

identify any risks of concern. The 

Agency relied upon the previous iron 

salts human health risk assessment, 

completed for the iron salts 

Reregistration Eligibility Decision 

(RED), to support the registration review 

of iron salts since no significant changes 

have been made since the RED that 

impact the risk conclusions for this 

case. The Agency also conducted an 

ecological risk assessment for existing 

uses of iron salts listed above. For 

existing uses, EPA does not expect iron 

salts to have direct or indirect adverse 

effects to non-listed and listed terrestrial 

vertebrates, terrestrial plants, terrestrial 

invertebrates, and aquatic organisms or 

to adversely modify any designated 

critical habitat for such species and has 

made a ‘‘no effect’’ determination under 

the ESA for those species and 

designated critical habitat for such 

species. EPA published an interim 

proposed registration review decision 

for iron salts in the Federal Register on 

September 24, 2014. One comment was 

received on the proposed interim 

decision; the comment did not change 

the conclusions of the decision. At this 

time in registration review, iron salts 

has not yet been evaluated under the 

EDSP. Therefore, the Agency’s final 

registration review decision is 

dependent upon the results of the 

evaluation of potential endocrine 

disruptor risk. Pending the completion 

of EDSP work for this case, EPA is 

issuing an interim registration review 

decision for iron salts at this time. 

Piperalin. Interim Decision (EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2009–0483). Currently, 

piperalin is registered exclusively for 

use to control powdery mildew on 

ornamental plants, shrubs, vines, and 

trees grown in commercial greenhouses 

and other similar enclosed structures 

with nonporous coverings. EPA 

conducted a human health risk 

assessment and did not identify any 

risks of concern. The Agency did not 

conduct a comprehensive ecological risk 

assessment since the use pattern does 

not likely result in outdoor exposures. 

No risks of concern were identified and 

the Agency has made a ‘‘no effect’’ 

determination for federally listed 

endangered and threatened (listed) 

species as well as a ‘‘no habitat 

modification’’ determination for all 

designated critical habitat. Piperalin has 

not been evaluated under the EDSP. 

Therefore, the Agency’s final 

registration review decision is 

dependent upon the result of the 

evaluation of potential endocrine 

disruptor risk. The EPA is issuing an 

interim registration review decision for 

piperalin. 

Quinclorac. Interim Decision (EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2007–1135). Quinclorac is a 

systemic herbicide used to control 

broadleaf and grass weeds via ground 

spray or aerial application. Currently 

registered uses of quinclorac include 

turf grasses, sorghum, wheat, rangeland/ 

pasture, rights-of way/fencerow/

hedgerow, grass grown for seed, fallow 

land, grass forage/fodder/hay, rice, 

rhubarb, and low growing berry (except 

strawberry) subgroup 13–07H. EPA 

conducted a human health risk 

assessment and did not identify any 

risks of concern. No human health 

mitigation is being undertaken for 

quinclorac at this time by the Agency. 

However, a data gap is identified by the 

Quinclorac human health risk 

assessment: An updated analytical 

standard for the quinclorac DMA salt to 

the EPA National Pesticide Standards 

Repository. The Agency also conducted 

an ecological risk assessment for 

existing listed above. For existing uses, 

risks of concern were identified for 

listed and non-listed terrestrial plant 

species as well as listed aquatic vascular 

plants from use of quinclorac on rice. 

EPA published an interim proposed 

registration review decision for 

quinclorac in the Federal Register on 

September 24, 2014. The document 

includes various label changes to 

mitigate risks to terrestrial plants by 

reducing spray drift and also calls for 

updates to quinclorac tolerances. One 

comment was received on the proposed 

interim decision, which did not change 

the conclusions of the decision or the 

proposed mitigation to address 

ecological risks. At this time in 

registration review, it is premature to 

make an endangered species effects 

determination for federally listed 

species and their designated critical 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

16384 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 59 / Friday, March 27, 2015 / Notices 

habitats under the ESA. Quinclorac has 

also not yet been evaluated under the 

EDSP. Therefore, the Agency’s final 

registration review decision is 

dependent upon the results of the 

evaluation of risks to threatened and 

endangered species and of potential 

endocrine disruptor risk. Pending the 

outcome of these actions, EPA is issuing 

an interim registration review decision 

for quinclorac this time. 

Triflumizole. Interim Decision (EPA– 

HQ–OPP–2006–0115). Triflumizole is a 

broad spectrum, imidazole fungicide 

(group 3) that inhibits ergosterol 

biosynthesis in fungi, acting as a 

systemic fungicide. Triflumizole is 

registered for application to a number of 

food and non-food crops, including 

ornamentals in greenhouses/shade 

houses, interior scapes, and Christmas 

trees/conifers on nurseries and 

plantations. It is also used as a preplant 

seed piece treatment on pineapples. 

EPA conducted a quantitative human 

health risk assessment and identified 

occupational handler and postapplication exposure risks of concern 

for several use scenarios. To mitigate the 

occupational handler risks of concern 

when applying triflumizole with open 

cab air blast equipment to apple, pear, 

and cherry, the technical registrant 

Chemtura agreed to require additional 

personal protective equipment of a 

chemical resistant hat. To address 

occupational post-application risks of 

concern, the registrant agreed to 

increase re-entry intervals (REIs) for 

grapes (table and raisin) to 1-day and 

hops to 3 days. The ecological risk 

assessment identified potential risks to 

listed mammals, birds, herpatofauna, 

freshwater fish, and aquatic estuarine/

marine invertebrates. To mitigate 

potential chronic risk to non-listed 

mammals, the registrant agreed to label 

changes reducing the number of 

applications per year for certain crops 

and increasing the retreatment interval 

(RTI) to reflect typical usage. EPA 

published a proposed interim 

registration review decision for 

triflumizole in the Federal Register on 

September 24, 2014. The document 

includes the various label changes to 

mitigate risks detailed previously. Only 

one comment from the Center for 

Biological Diversity was received on the 

proposed interim decision; this 

comment did not change the 

conclusions of the decision or the 

proposed mitigation to address the risks. 

At this time in registration review, it is 

premature to make an endangered 

species effects determination for 

federally listed species and their 

designated critical habitats under the 

ESA. Also, triflumizole has not yet been 

evaluated under the EDSP. Therefore, 

the Agency’s final registration review 

decision is dependent upon the results 

of the evaluation of risks to threatened 

and endangered species and of potential 

endocrine disruptor risk. Pending the 

outcome of these actions, EPA is issuing 

an interim registration review decision 

for triflumizole at this time. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the 

registration review case docket for 

fluazinam (case 7013), flumetsulam 

(case 7229), flutolanil (case 7010), 

hexaflumuron (case 7413), iron salts 

(case 4058), piperalin (case 3114), 

quinclorac (case 7222), and triflumizole 

(case 7003) will remain open until all 

actions required in the final/interim 

decision have been completed. 

Background on the registration review 

program is provided at: http://www.epa.

gov/oppsrrd1/registration_review. Links 

to earlier documents related to the 

registration review of these pesticides 

are provided at: 

http://www2.epa.gov/pesticidereevaluation/individualpesticidesregistration-review. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: March 17, 2015. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07004 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–9020–2] 

Environmental Impact Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

AGENCY: Office of Federal Activities, 

General Information (202) 564–7146 or 

http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly receipt of Environmental 

Impact Statements. 

Filed 03/16/2015 Through 03/20/

2015. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. 

Notice 

Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act 

requires that EPA make public its 

comments on EISs issued by other 

Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters 

on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.

gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html. 

EIS No. 20150075, Draft Supplement, 

FHWA, AK, Sterling Highway MP 

45—60 Project, Comment Period 

Ends: 05/26/2015, Contact: John 

Lohrey 907–586–7418 

EIS No. 20150076, Final EIS, BLM, ID, 

Thompson Creek Mine Expansion and 

Public Land Disposal Proposed 

Resource Management Plan 

Amendment, Review Period Ends: 04/ 

27/2015, Contact: Ken Gardner 208– 

879–6210 

EIS No. 20150077, Final EIS, USFS, CO, 

Eldora Mountain Resort Ski Area 

Projects, Review Period Ends: 05/04/ 

2015, Contact: K. Reid Armstrong 

303–541–2532 

EIS No. 20150078, Draft EIS, NRC, IL, 

Generic—License Renewal of Nuclear 

Plants, Supplement 55 Regarding 

Braidwood Station Units 1 and 2, 

Comment Period Ends: 05/12/2015, 

Contact: Tam Tran 301–415–3617 

EIS No. 20150079, Final EIS, NRC, TN, 

Generic- License Renewal of Nuclear 

Plants, Supplement 53 Regarding 

Sequoyah Nuclear Station Units 1 and 

2, Review Period Ends: 04/27/2015, 

Contact: David Drucker 301–415–6223 

EIS No. 20150080, Final EIS, BLM, CO, 

Proposed Resource Management Plan 

Amendment for Oil and Gas 

Development in the White River Field 

Office, Review Period Ends: 04/27/

2015, Contact: Heather Sauls 970– 

878–3855 

EIS No. 20150081, Second Final EIS, 

BLM, USFS, ID, Smoky Canyon Mine 

Panels F and G Lease and Mine Plan 

Modification Project, Review Period 

Ends: 04/27/2015, Contact: Diane 

Wheeler 208–557–5839 

The U.S. Department of the Interior’s 

Bureau of Land Management and The 

U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Forest 

Service are joint lead agencies for the 

above project. 

EIS No. 20150082, Final EIS, BR, CA, 

Long-term Water Transfers, Review 

Period Ends: 04/27/2015, Contact: 

Brad Hubbard 916–978–5204 

Dated: March 25, 2015. 

Cliff Rader, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07137 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OEI–2011–0096; FRL–9924–15– 

OEI] 

Information Collection Request 

Submitted to OMB for Review and 

Approval; Comment Request; CrossMedia Electronic Reporting Rule 

(Renewal) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency has submitted an information 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES