alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1099 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1099

 To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, to 
  modify requirements under that Act relating to exemptions, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 2023

 Mr. Pfluger (for himself and Mr. Crow) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, to 
  modify requirements under that Act relating to exemptions, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Adversary Influence, 
Disinformation, and Obscured Foreign Financing Act of 2023'' or the 
``PAID OFF Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF EXEMPTIONS UNDER FARA.

    (a) Definition.--Section 1 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act 
of 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 611) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(q) The term `country of concern' means--
            ``(1) the People's Republic of China;
            ``(2) the Russian Federation;
            ``(3) the Islamic Republic of Iran;
            ``(4) the Democratic People's Republic of Korea;
            ``(5) the Republic of Cuba; and
            ``(6) the Syrian Arab Republic.''.
    (b) Exemptions.--Section 3 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act 
of 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 613), is amended, in the matter 
preceding subsection (a), by inserting ``, except that the exemptions 
under subsections (d)(1) and (h) shall not apply to any agent of a 
foreign principal that is a country of concern'' before the colon.
    (c) Sunset.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall 
terminate on October 1, 2026.
                                 <all>
```
#### 352.270-9 Non-Discrimination for Conscience.

As prescribed in HHSAR 370.701, the Contracting Officer shall insert the following provision:

# Non-Discrimination for Conscience (DEC 2015)

(a) Section 301(d) of the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act, as amended, provides that an organization, including a faith-based organization, that is otherwise eligible to receive assistance under section 104A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, under the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003, under the Tom Lantos and Henry J. Hyde United States Global Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Reauthorization Act of 2008, or under any amendment to the foregoing Acts for HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, or care—

(1) Shall not be required, as a condition of receiving such assistance, to—

(i) Endorse or utilize a multisectoral or comprehensive approach to combating HIV/AIDS; or

(ii) Endorse, utilize, make a referral to, become integrated with, or otherwise participate in any program or activity to which the organization has a religious or moral objection.

(2) Shall not be discriminated against under the provisions of law in subparagraph (a) for refusing to meet any requirement described in paragraph (a)(1) in this solicitation.

(b) Accordingly, an offeror who believes this solicitation contains work requirements requiring it endorse or utilize a multisectoral or comprehensive approach to combating HIV/AIDS, or endorse, utilize, make referral to, become integrated with, or otherwise participate in a program or activity to which it has a religious or moral objection, shall identify those work requirements it excluded in its technical proposal.

(c) The Government acknowledges that an offeror has specific rights, as cited in paragraph (b), to exclude certain work requirements in this solicitation from its proposal. However, the Government reserves the right to not make an award to an offeror whose proposal does not comply with the salient work requirements of the solicitation. Any exercise of that Government right will be made by the Head of the Contracting Activity.

(End of provision)
#### 9905.501-20 Purpose.

The purpose of this Cost Accounting Standard is to ensure that each educational institution's practices used in estimating costs for a proposal are consistent with cost accounting practices used by the institution in accumulating and reporting costs. Consistency in the application of cost accounting practices is necessary to enhance the likelihood that comparable transactions are treated alike. With respect to individual contracts, the consistent application of cost accounting practices will facilitate the preparation of reliable cost estimates used in pricing a proposal and their comparison with the costs of performance of the resulting contract. Such comparisons provide one important basis for financial control over costs during contract performance and aid in establishing accountability for costs in the manner agreed to by both parties at the time of contracting. The comparisons also provide an improved basis for evaluating estimating capabilities.
§ 1.29 Subpoenas relating to investigations under statutes administered by the Secretary of Agriculture. ( a ) *Issuance of subpoena.* ( 1 ) When the Secretary is authorized by statute to issue a subpoena in connection with an investigation being conducted by the Department, the attendance of a witness and the production of evidence relating to the investigation may be required by subpoena at any designated place, including the witness' place of business. Upon request of any representative of the Secretary involved in connection with the investigation, the subpoena may be issued by the Secretary, the Inspector General, or any Department official authorized pursuant to part 2 of this title to administer the program to which the subpoena relates, if the official who is to issue the subpoena is satisfied as to the reasonableness of the grounds, necessity, and scope of the subpoena. Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the authority to issue subpoenas may not be delegated or redelegated by the head of an agency.
( 2 ) The Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, may delegate the authority to issue subpoenas in connection with investigations being conducted under the Packers and Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. 181-229), to the Deputy Administrator, Packers and Stockyards Programs.
( 3 ) In the case of a subpoena issued under the Animal Health Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 8301-8317), Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701-7772), or Title V of the Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000 (7 U.S.C. 2279e-2279f), the subpoena will be reviewed for legal sufficiency by the Office of the General Counsel, USDA.
( b ) *Service of subpoena.* ( 1 ) A subpoena issued pursuant to this section may be served by: ( i ) A U.S. Marshal or Deputy Marshal,
( ii ) Any other person who is not less than 18 years of age, or
( iii ) Certified or registered mailing of a copy of the subpoena addressed to the person to be served at his, her, or its last known residence or principal place of business or residence.
( 2 ) Proof of service may be made by the return of service on the subpoena by the U.S. Marshal, or Deputy Marshal; or, if served by an individual other than a U.S. Marshal or Deputy Marshal, by an affidavit or certification of such person stating that he or she personally served a copy of the subpoena upon the person named in the subpoena; or, if service was by certified or registered mail, by the signed Postal Service receipt.
( 3 ) In making personal service, the person making service shall leave a copy of the subpoena with the person subpoenaed; and the original, bearing or accompanied by the required proof of service, shall be returned to the official who issued the subpoena.
[39 FR 15277, May 2, 1974, as amended at 40 FR 58281, Dec. 16, 1975; 42 FR 65131, Dec. 30, 1977; 43 FR 12673, Mar. 27, 1978; 60 FR 66481, Dec. 22, 1995; 66 FR 36907, July 16, 2001; 67 FR 70674, Nov. 26, 2002]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           OJJDP Annual Report 2012: How OJJDP Is Working for Youth Justice and Safety      

# OJJDP Annual Report 2012: How OJJDP Is Working for Youth Justice and Safety

This report provides an overview of the resources, research and evaluation findings, and training and technical assistance provided by OJJDP. It also describes the nearly $268 million in grants awarded by OJJDP to reduce children’s exposure to violence, intervene in and prevent girls’ delinquency, support mentoring activities and promote family engagement, address the “school to prison” pipeline, facilitate reentry efforts, prevent bullying, improve conditions for tribal youth, fight child exploitation, strengthen the juvenile justice system, and enhance public safety.

http://www.ojjdp.gov/pubs/241584.pdf
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           YRBSS Results: Reports and Fact Sheets      

# YRBSS Results: Reports and Fact Sheets

This webpage from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides YRBSS results reports, including high school and middle school reports and fact sheets. 

YRBSS Results: Reports and Fact Sheets
#### 950.7004-950.7005 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF



ENERGY EAST CORPORATION



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Wesley W. von Schack, Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer of Energy East Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) Energy East Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Energy East Corporation.

Dated: August 13, 2003

/s/Wesley W. von Schack



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF



ENERGY EAST CORPORATION



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Kenneth M. Jasinski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Energy East Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) Energy East Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Energy East Corporation.

Dated: Dated: August 13, 2003

/s/Kenneth M. Jasinski                                          Kenneth M. Jasinski
         Executive Vice President and 
         Chief Financial Officer
#### Sukhminder SINGH, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS, Respondent.

No. 05-1973-ag.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Oct. 5, 2007.

Sukhminder Singh, Bellerose, NY, pro se.

Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney for the District of Maine, William J. Schneider, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, ME, for Respondent.

PRESENT: Hon. ROBERT D. SACK, Hon. B.D. PARKER and Hon. RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

*SUMMARY ORDER*

Sukhminder Singh, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of a March 29, 2005 order of the BIA denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. *In re Sukhminder Singh,*No. [ AXX XXX XXX ] (B.I.A. Mar. 29, 2005). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case.

We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. *See Kaur v. BIA,*413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir.2005) (per curiam). An abuse of discretion may be found where the decision “provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or conclusory statements; that is to say, where the Board has acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner.” *Ke Zhen Zhao v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*265 F.3d 83, 93 (2d Cir.2001) (internal citations omitted).

As a preliminary matter, to the extent that Singh attempts to reargue the merits of the underlying denial of his asylum application, that decision is not properly before this Court. Only the BIA’s March 2005 decision is before us as that is the only decision from which a petition for review was timely filed. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1).

The BIA properly denied Singh’s third motion to reopen as numerically barred. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (an alien may *50file only one motion to reopen). Moreover, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in finding that Singh failed to present material evidence of changed country conditions in order to satisfy the exception to this numerical bar. *Cfi*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(e)(3)(ii); *Poradisova v. Gonzales,*420 F.3d 70, 78 (2d Cir.2005). Singh submitted no evidence other than the bare assertions in his motion that country conditions had materially changed in India.

For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. Having completed our review, the pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DISMISSED as moot.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1070 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1070

To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to provide the owner or operator 
of a critical energy resource facility an interim permit under subtitle 
    C that is subject to final approval by the Administrator of the 
        Environmental Protection Agency, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 17, 2023

Mr. Carter of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to provide the owner or operator 
of a critical energy resource facility an interim permit under subtitle 
    C that is subject to final approval by the Administrator of the 
        Environmental Protection Agency, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INTERIM HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMITS.

    Section 3005(e) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 U.S.C. 6925(e)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(A)--
                    (A) in clause (i), by striking ``or'' at the end;
                    (B) in clause (ii), by inserting ``or'' after 
                ``this section,'';
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(iii) is a critical energy resource facility,''; 
                and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(4) Definitions.--For the purposes of this subsection:
            ``(A) Critical energy resource.--The term `critical energy 
        resource' means any energy resource that, as determined by the 
        Secretary of Energy--
                    ``(i) is essential to the energy sector and energy 
                systems of the United States; and
                    ``(ii) the supply chain of which is vulnerable to 
                disruption.
            ``(B) Critical energy resource facility.--The term 
        `critical energy resource facility' means a facility that 
        processes or refines a critical energy resource.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### 803.570-2 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.203-70, Commercial advertising, in solicitations and contracts expected to equal or exceed the micro-purchase threshold.
#### Kathleen D. Macagnone, Respondent, v Anthony D. Macagnone, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 826]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), dated September 25, 2002, as directed him to pay to the plaintiff wife pendente lite child support in the sum of $1,720 per month for the parties’ two minor children, an interim counsel fee in the sum of $5,000, all carrying charges on the marital residence, all educational and extracurricular expenses of the parties’ two minor children, 100% of the unreimbursed non-elective medical, dental, and pharmaceutical expenses of the plaintiff wife and the two minor children, and automobile insurance premiums for the plaintiff wife’s motor vehicle.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“Pendente lite awards should reflect an accommodation between the reasonable needs of the moving spouse and the financial ability of the other spouse with due regard for the parties’ preseparation standard of living” *(Campanaro v Campanaro,*292 AD2d 330 [2002]; *see Landau v Landau,*258 AD2d 508, 509 [1999]). “An appellate court will rarely modify such an award, unless exigent circumstances exist, such as where a party is unable to meet his or her own financial obligations or justice otherwise requires” *(Taylor v Taylor,*306 AD2d 401 [2003]). The husband failed to demonstrate that such circumstances exist. Therefore, modification of the award is unwarranted. “Rather, perceived inequities in pendente lite orders are best addressed via a speedy trial at which the parties’ economic circumstances may be thoroughly explored” *(Campanaro v Campanaro, supra*at 331).

*681Contrary to the husband’s contention, the Supreme Court did not award a double shelter allowance (see *Hondros v Hondros,*259 AD2d 592 [1999]; *cf. Krantz v Krantz,*175 AD2d 863, 864 [1991]). Moreover, the Supreme Court correctly declined to impute income to the wife, since there was no evidence in the record which would permit the calculation of her potential earnings (see *Hunter v Hunter,*290 AD2d 535 [2002]).

In light of the parties’ disparate economic circumstances, the award of an interim counsel fee to the wife was a provident exercise of discretion (see Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; *O’Shea v O’Shea,*93 NY2d 187, 193 [1999]; *DeVerna v DeVerna,*4 AD3d 323 [2004]; *Shanon v Patterson,*294 AD2d 485, 486 [2002]).

The husband’s remaining contention is improperly raised on this appeal. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Crane, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alan L. Hunte, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Trenwick Group Ltd., hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that
this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)) and that the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Trenwick Group Ltd.

Date:  March 31, 2003


/s/ Alan L. Hunte
------------------------------
Alan L. Hunte
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer