BORAL BRICKS PLANT4· FIELD DATA CALCULATIONS ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 1BORALBRICKSANALYTICALTeSTINGCONSULTANTS,INC.InitialSourceSurveyTestDate09/15/10CompanyBORALBRICKAddressCity,StateAugusta,GAProcessTestedDIFFBaghouseOutletSpecificSourcePlant4AirPollutionControlsD!FFBaghouseOutletTestMethods1-5,26AATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENOIXPAGENo.12

# 1:

# ~ " 

# 2**~** z ? 

# E 01 

# .. "'

G) 

# em

# ~;2 

# ,_ (J) 

# -a·£ mS::m**~z:s:** 

# m-ICil 

# s:"'"' 

# , 

# .. - m"'o 

# "'"'z

• -i**~cnrn**



# .**0~~** 

# c;;-u 

# "'"' co ;o<- 

# -<m

# "~

# ~ "'



# , " " m 

# z 0 

# x

# ~ m 

# z 

# "


# - "' Method 1 -Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources (Circular Stack) Distance- Far Wall to Outside of Port (in) Distance- Near Wall to Outside of Port (in) Inside Diameter of Stack (in) 63.00 4.25 Port Length 58.75

Port Diameter- For Ref. Only (in) 4.00 Distance to Upstream Disturbance (It) 

# Distance to Downstream Disturbance (It) 

# Diameters Upstream Diameters Downstream Minimum Distance to Stack Wall (Default is 1.0 inch) 20.00 18.00 4.09 3.68 1.00 Traverse Point Number 1 

# 2 

# 3 

# 4 5 6 7 8 9 

# 10 11 

# 12 Conversion Table for Decimal to Inch Fraction 1/16 1/8 

# 3/16 1/4 5/16 0.06 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 PROBE MARKINGS 

# Decimal Inches Number of Traverse Points on a Diameter

2 4 6 8 

# 12.83 8.19 6.84 

# 6.13 54.42 18.94 12.83 10.42 48.31 21.64 15.65 59.06 45.61 

# 23.23 54.42 44.02 60.42 51.60 

# 56.83 61.12 

# 10 5.78 9.07 12.83 17.53 24.34 42.91 49.72 54.42 58.18 61A7 3/8 

# 0.38



# 12 5.48 8.19 11.18 14.65 18.94 25.17 42.09 48.31 52.60 56.07 59.06 61.77 

# "' 0 :0 

# , ,... 

# "' :0 

# 0 

# " "'BORAL BRICKS PM, HCI, HF AND Cl2 EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS ATCPROJECT
No. P-10142 LOCATION: BORALBRICK SOURCE: DIFF Baghouse _fnlet DArA Run#1 Runl!2
Run 113- AVERAGE' DATE 09115110 09/15110 09/15110 RUN TIME (min) 60.00 00.00 60.00 Dn (fn) 0.249 0.249 0.249 An(ft1) 3.38E-04 3.3SE..Q4 3.38E-04 AVG DH (fn H20) 0.85 0.87 0.96 P ATM{lliHg)
30.04 30.00 29.96 Pm{fnHg)
30.10 30.06 30.<)3 Ps(GAUGE}
-1.20 -1.20 -1.20 Ps(fNHG)
29.95 29.91 29.87 Tm(F} eo.on 89.67 95.08 Tm(R} 539.6\l 549.36 554.77 Vm(ft3) 29.15 21J.OO 31.73 Vm STD(ft3} 28.55 2BA5 30.15 1/tQ(ml} 42.00 33.00 32.00 W$TD(ft3)

1.98 1.56 1,51 VSTO{ft3} 30.53 30.00 31.66 "" 6.49 5.19 4.17 %S\1Pl 100.00 100.00 100.00 MD 0.935 0.948 0.952: MWD 28.94 28.94 2S.G4 M 28.23 28.37 2S.42 Tli(F} 275.21 200.36 283.42 Ts(RJ 734.00 740,07 743.11 SUMSQRTDP

12.77 12.77 13.26 NDP 24.00 24.00 24.00 ;.,;:_ -AVGSQRTDP

0.53 0.53 0.55 CP 0.1!4 0.84 0.84 Vs (ft!s) 35.62 35.69 37.14 DsOnJ 60.00 60.00 60.00 As(fttj 19Jl3 19.63 19.63 QS, FLOW. ACFM 41,966 42,050 43,749 Q STD (ft31mfn) 30,183 29,992 31,035 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM 28,225 28,436 29,555 WT(gm)·PM 0.0080 0.0075 1).0035 WT(gm)·HCL 0.0000 0.0030 0.0030 WT(gm}·HF 0.0111 0.0357 0.0410 WT(gm)·C12 2.27E-o4 1.82E-OS 1.76E-05 "' 97.94 96.86 98.79 %C02
1.00 1.00 1.00 "02 **1~.41** 19.50 19.46 """ 0.00 0.00 0.00 %112 79.59 79.50 79.54 PM (fbslhr} 1.046 {).992 0.454 PM(kglhrj 0.4746 0.4499 0.2059 ProctuctJon (tph}
6.75 8.75 6.75 Production (Mg) 3.06E..03 3.06E.03 3.00E-03 PM (kg/Mg of Product} 1.37E+04 1.37E+D4 1.43E+04 PM (mg/dscm) 1.85E+07 1.66E+07 1.52E+07 PM (mgldscm

@ 7% 02} 1.73E+08 1.54E+08 1.57E+OS HCI {fbslhr) 7.86E..{)2 3..97E...01 3.B8E..Ot f/Cl(Ag!M 3..57E-02 1.80E-01 1.76E-Ot HCJ (kg/Mg of Product) 9.86E+03 9.80E+03 1.01E+04 HCJ(ppm) 652.04 3266.69 307&.35 HCI (ppm @ 1% 02) 6{)72.95 32433.61 29640.74 HF(Ibslhr) 1.45E+OO 4.72E+00 5.32E:+OO HF(kgthr} S.57E-01 2.14E+OO 2.41E+OO HF (kgiMg of Product} 9.22E+03 9,29E+03 9.65E+03 HF(ppm) 6592,01 21317.93 23116.82 HF (ppm@ 7% 02) 61396.34 211658.63 222730.97 CIZ {lb$/hr) 2.97E--02 2.41E-03 2.28E-03 Cl2(kglhr) 1.35E..OZ 1.09E--o3 1.04E-03 Cl2 fkB/Mg of Product) 2.61E-03 2.45E-03 1.14E-03 C12(ppm) 478.98 38.54 35.16 C/2 (ppm@ 7% 02} 4461.10 382,00 338.76 QS,. FLOW. ACMM
1188 1191 1239 QS, Fl..OW, DSCMM

799
805
837 1 Thet>filtfcalllmoun-t

of muistvre thl!lt Ts c.an b()/d. 11 %M>-%$VP, %SVPwilf
bill utUin<i
fn Ci'llculllt/!1/la. EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

5.4S 279.67 739.3£1 35.15 42,5SS 30,403 2S,739 fM0&3 0.0022 0.0"29J. **~).0001** 1.00 19.45 0.831 0.37GS 6.7500 3.0GE..03 1.39E+04 1.71E+G1 1.64E+G8 2.S3E·01 **1.311:~·01** 9.93E-t03 2331.70 2271!1.711 3.83E+OO 1.74E.j.OO 9.39E+03: 17008.92 165261.31 1.15E-02 5.20E·03 2.0TE·03 184.23 1727,51 1206 814 APPENDIX PAGE No.4BORAL BRICKS ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09/15/10 SOURCE D!FF Baghouse Outlet Run#1

K=o 2.5643 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1

77 247 0.39 1.00 0.624 19.5

1.0 A2

78 245 0.38 0.97 0.616 A3

78 245 0.37 0.95 0.608 A4

78 244 0.37 0.95 0.608 A5

78 248 0.36 0.92 0.600 A6

78 245 0.36 0.92 0.600 A7

78 245 0.37 0.95 0.608 19.6
1.0 AS

78 244 0.36 0.92 0,600 A9

79 243 0.36 0.92 0.600 MIJ

79 245 0.33 0.85 0.574 A11

79 244 0.33 0.85 0.574 A12

79 244 0.33 0.85 0.574 B1

79 245 0.37 0.95 0.608 19.5
1.0 B2

80 245 0.38 0.97 0.616 BJ

80 245 0.37 0.95 0.608 B4

80 245 0.36 0.92 0.600 B5

80 246 0.36 0.92 0.600 86

80 245 0.36 0.92 0.600 137

80 244 0.36 0.92 0.800 19.8
1.0 88

81 245 0.36 0.92 0.600 B9

81 245 0.35 0.90 0.592 810

82 245 0.35 0.90 0.592 811

82 245 0.34 0.87 0.583 B12

83 244 0.34 0.87 0.583 19.4
1.0 79.46 244.88 0.36 0.92 14.372 19.56 1.00 corrected per 7 e-5b 19.47 Vm(ft3) Initial 398.71

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)
7!}.53 Final 434.33 Total 35.62 %Excess Air 1272.93 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 16BORAL BRICKS ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09115110 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet Run#2

K" 2.5883 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1

82 248 0.40 1.04 0.632 19.4
i.O A2

82 248 0.38 0.98 0.616 A3

82 248 0.36 0.93 0.600 A4

82 248 0.36 0.93 0.600 A5

82 248 0.36 0.93 0.600 Ali

83 248 0.35 0.91 0.592 AT

83 249 0.35 0.91 0.592 19.4
1.0 A8

83 249 0.34 0.88 0.583 A9

83 249 0.34 0.88 0.583 A10

84 249 0.33 0.85 0.574 A11

84 249 0.33 0.85 0.574 A12

84 249 0.32 0.83 0.566 81

85 248 0.39 1.01 0.824
19.6
1.0 82

86 248 0.38 0.98 0.616 83

86 247 0.38 0.98 0.616 B4

86 247 0.38 0.98 0.616 85

66 247 0.36 0.93 0.600 B6

86 247 0.36 0.93 0.600 87

87 246 0.36 0.93 o.aoo 19.8
1.0 88

87 246 0.35 0.91 0.592 89

87 246 0.34 0.88 0.583 B10

87 248 0.34 0.88 0.583 B11

87 246 0.34 0.88 0.583 812

87 245 0.33 0.85 0.574 19.6
1.0 84.63 247.54 0.36 0.92 14.302 19.56 1.00 corrected per 7e--5b 19.47 Vm(ft3) Initial 434.71

% N2 (BY DIFFERE:NC£}
79.53 Final Total ATC PROJECT No. P-10142 469.66 34.95 %Excess Air EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER
201 0
1272.93 APPENDIX PAGE No. 17ATC PROJECT No. P-1 0142
BORAL BRICKS PM, HCI, HF AND Cl2 EMISSION RATE CALCUlATIONS LOCATION: GORAl.. 13RfCK **~OURCE:** DJFF Baghouse Outlet DATA Run#t Run#2 Run fiJ AVERAGE DATE 09/15/10 09/15110 09115/10 RUN TIME (min) 00.00 60.00 so.oo Dn(ln} 0.237 0.237 0.237 An (fl1) 3.00E-tl4 3.06E...04 **3Jl8E~4** AVG DH (In H20}
0.92 0.92 0.00 PATM(inHg}
30.04 30.00 29.00 Pm{TnHg)
30.11 30.07 30.03 Ps (GAUGE)
0.22 0.22 0.22 Ps(INHG} 30.06 30.02 29.00 Tm(FJ 79.46 84.63 89.50 Tm{R} 539,15 544.32 549.19 Vm(ft3) 35.62 34.00 35.90 Vm STD(ftJ) 33.80 32.81 33.36 Vl.Q(ml) 14,50 10.20 14.80 WSTD(tt3)

0.68 OAB 0.70 VSTD(ft3)
34.49 33.2ll 34.00 %M
UlB
1.44 2.05 %SVP

1 100.00 100.00 100.00 MO 0.980 0.986 0.980 MWO 28.94 26.94 28.93 M 28.72 28.78

28.71 Ts(F} 2.41.86 247.54- 248,83 Ts(R) 704.57 701'.23 708.52 SUMSQRTDP
14.37 14.30 14.56 NDP 24.00 24.00 24.00 AVGSQRTDP

0.80 0.60 0.61 CP 0.84 0.64 0.84 Vs (ffls) 38.85 38.72 39.53 Ds(ln} 58,75 5S.75 58.75 As (ft2} 18.83 18,83 18,83 QS, FLOW. ACFM 43,880 43,735 44,650 Q SID (ft3/min) 33,033 32,7$6 33,3:36 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM 32,379 32,2$3 32,653 WT(gm)·PM 0.0002. 0.0026 0.0000 WT(gm}-HCL o.ooto 0.0011 0,0013 Wf(gm)·HF 0.0015 0.0018 0,0023 WT(gm)·CIZ 1.69E·05 1.876-05 LS1E:-05 !OJ 108.$9 104.16 104.70 %COZ
1.00 1.00
1.00 "02 1f.IA-7 19.47 19.23 %CO 0.00 0.00 O.OQ %N2 79.53 79.53 79.77 PM(Ibslhr}
0.786 0,338 0.777 PM (kg/h<} 0.3!564 0.1535 0.3524 Producuon (tph}
6.15 6.75 6-.75 Production (Mg} 3:06E.03 3.06E-03 3.06E-03 PM (kg/Mg of Ptoduct) 1.43E.o-04 1.43E+04 1.46E+04 PM (mgldscm) **1.95E>~-07** 1.82E+07 1.76E+07 PM (mgldscm
@: 7% 02) 1.89E1{18 1.77E+08 1.46E+08 HCI (lbslht) 1.25E-01 1.43E-01 1.65E-01 HCI(kg!M 5.68E-02 6.49E-02 7.51E.02 HCf {kg/Mg of Product) 1.08E+04 1.07E+04 1.0SE+04 HCI(ppm) 005.30 1038.35 1166.51 HCI (ppm @ 7% 02) 8783.15 10074.01 9866,51 HF(Ibslhr) 1.93E-Ot 2.35E-01 3.01E-01 HF(kglhf') 8.75E-02 t.o7E-01 1.37E-01 HF (kg/Mg of Product) 1.05E-l-04 i.OSE-i-04 1.0'fE+04 HF(ppm) 765,36 938.65 1184.00 HF (ppm @ 7% 02) 7425.72 9007.38 9851.13 C/2 (fbs!hr) 2.14E-03 2.43E-03 1.9£E-03 Cl2{kgfhr) 9.71E-04 UOE-03 8.87E-04 C/2 (kg!Mg of Product) 2.02E-03 8A9E-04 1.96E-03 CJl{ppm) 30.12 34.3S 27.27 Ct2 {ppm @ 7% 02) 292.19 333.08 2:26.73. QS, FLOW, ACMM 1243 1238 1264 QS, R.OW, DSCMM

917
914
925 1 Theontf!Cltt **t~mount ofmo.Jstu~**  that T;s **c,:~~n** hold, It **~llf:I>%SVP,** "SYP wiff b& utill:z.Gd ln ettlcu/a.tio/1$, EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5. SALISBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

,.., 247.0S 106.71 39.03 44,089 33,042 32,438 0.0049 0.0011 o-.0019 0.0000 1.01} 19.39 o.a34 G.M74 6.7500 3.06E-03 1:.44E+04 1.85E+07 1,71E-tos 1.45E-Of B.56E-02 1.08E+04 1043.39 9574.66 Z.43E·01 UOE-01 1.06E+04 962.23 8738.08 2.1ae:.o3 9.S7E-Q4 1.61E--03 3G.57 284.0ll 1248 ,. APPENDIX PAGE No. 14Run #1 BeGINNING ENDING NeT Run #2 BEGINNING ENDING NET Run#3 BEGINNING ENDING NeT ATC PROJECT No. P-10142
BORAL BRICKS MOISTURE DATA Plant
4 9/15/2010 1st Imp. 2ndlmp. 3rdl4th Imp. 100
100 200 110
100 200 10

0

0 1st Imp. 2nd Imp. 3rd/4th Imp. 100
100 200 106
100 200 6

0

0 1st Imp. 2nd Imp. 3rdl4th Imp. 100 100 200 111
100 200 11

0

0 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

5th Imp. TOTALS 300.0 304.5 4.5 14.5 5th Imp. TOTALS 300.0 304.2 4.2 10.2 5th Imp. TOTALS 300.0 303.8 3.8 14.8 APPENDIX PAGE No. 15BORAL BRICKS !SOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09/15/10 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet Run #3

K= 2.6571 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1

87 249 0.39 1.04 0.624
19.1
1.0 A2

87 249 0.39 1.04 0.624 A3

87 249 0.39 1.04 0.624 A4

87 250 0.38 1.01 0.616 A5

87 250 0.38 1.01 0.616 A6

88 250 0.38 1.01 0.616 A?

88 249 0.37 0.98 0.608 19.5
1.0 A8

88 248 0.37 0.98 0.608 A9

88 248 0.36 0.96 o.600 MO

89 247 0.32 0.85 0.566 A11

89 247 0.32 0.85 0.566 A12

89 247 0.32 0.85 0.566 B1

89 251 0.37 0.98 0.608 19.3
1.0 82

89 251 0.37 0.98 0.608 83

90 251 0.37 0.98 0.608 B4

90 251 0.38 1.01 0.616 135

91 250 0.38 1.01 0.616 BIJ

91 249 0.39 1.04 0.624 87

91 249 0.39 1.04 0.624 19.3
1.0 88

91 248 0.38 1.01 0.616 89

92 248 0.38 1.01 0.616 811)

93 248 0.36 0.96 0.600 811

93 247 0.35 0.93 0.592 812

94 246 0.35 0.93 0.592 19.4
1.0 89.51) 248.83 0.37 1).98 14.559 19.32 1.{)1) corrected per 7e-5b 19.23 Vm(ft3} Initial 469.99

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE) 79.77 Final 505.89 Total 35.90 %&cess Air 1050.1)1 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5. SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 18BORAL BRICKS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS BORALBRICK Augusta, GA Run #1 1) ABSOLUTE PRESSURE

IN DRY GAS METER Pm);: PATM

+ AVG OH/13.6 PATM Avg. DH 30.04 0.92 2} ABSOlUTE STACK PRESSURE Ps =: P ATM + Ps{GAUGE)/13.6 PATM Ps{GAUGE} 30.04 0.22

Pm 30.11 Ps 30.05 3) SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANOARD CONDITIONS VM STD = {VM}'(Y}'(f STD/TM)'(PMIP STD) Vm
Tm

y VmSTD 35.62 539.1S 0.963 33.80

T STD= PSTD= ft3 4) VOLUME OF WATER COLLECTED, CORRECTED
TO STANDARD CONDITIONS W STO = W STOw+ WSTDsg W STDw= (.002B73)'{VLQw)'(T STD/P STD) W STDsg

= (.002£68)'VlQsg)'(f STD/P STD) WHERE 0.002673

=- 0.04707 **FT3/ML~IN.** HG/17.64 DEG. R WHERE 0.002668

= 0.04715 FT3/G"1N.HG/17.64 OEG. R. VLQ {w) 10.00 VLQ {sg) 4.50 WSTD 0.63
ff3 5) TOTAl SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS V STD=Vm STD+W STD =
34.49 ff3 6) PERCENT MOISTURE

IN STACK GAS %M = {100)"{W STD)N STD
= 1.98% 7) MOLE FRACTION OF DRY GAS MD= **{100~%M}1100**

=-

0.980

528 DEG R. 29.92 IN. HG ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 19BORAL BRICKS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS (continued) BORALBRICK Augusta, GA Run#1 8) MOLECUlAR WEIGHT OF THE DRY GAS MWD = (%C02'0.44)+(02'0.32)+((%CO+%N2)'0.28) %C02 %02 %CO 1.0 19.5

0.0 9) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE WET GAS M = (MWD)'(MD)

+ 18(1-MO)

=
%N2 79.5 WHERE
18 =MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF WATER, G/G.MOLE 10) STACK VELOCITY VS = (85.49)'(CP)'((TSI(PS)(M))'112'((SUM

SQRT DP)IN DP)) where 85.49

= ftlsec"" **[lbllb-mole~Jn.Hg)/(deg.**

**R~ln** H20)J"'.5 CP 0.$4 T${R) 704.57 SUM SQRT 14.37 11} STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE QS = (60)'{VS)'(AS) AS Qnlet) 18.83

NOP 24 QS 43,880 MWD 28.94 28.72
vs $8.85 12) STACK VOL.UMETR!C FLOW RATe, STANDARD COt-m!T!ONS INClUDING MOISTURE Q STD = Q STD DRYIMD

33,033 13) STACK VOLUME FLOW RATE STANDARD CONDITION$ ORY Q STD **DRY~** 17.647*60*Md"Vs''A"{Ps!Ts{R))

= 32,379 14) POlLUTANT MASS RATE, CONCENTRATION BASIS PMRC
= (.1323)'(WT)'(Q STD)N STD WHERE 0.1323 =COMBINED CONVEtiSION FACTOR {60 M!N/HR*0.00220 LBS/GRAM} WT(GRAMS) 0.0062 15) PERCENT ISOKINETIC

PMRC 0.786 %1 = **{0.09450'Ts~vm std)/{Ps"Vs"'An"Tima~Md)**  Run Tii'M Area of Nozzle

%1 106.99 60 3.06!2-04 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 20BORAL BRICKS ANAL YT!CAL. TESTING CONSULT ANTS, INC. Initial Source Survey Test Date 09115/10 Company BORAL BRICK Address City, State Augusta, GA Process Tested DIFF Baghouse Outlet Specific Source Plant
4 Air Pollution Controls DIFF Baghouse Outlet Test Methods US EPA M29 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 32

# )> 

# ~ "0 

# 2

**~**

**~** ]; 0 

# :;:: 

# "'

**~** ern (/), 

# -jl> l>(i 

# (/)""' rn..:m

**~z::** 

# rn-155 ;::(/)(!) 

# OJ
... - 

# rn"'o 

# "'"'z

- -l 

# "'(l)m ;:)>.(/) oc-l

(I)"U 

# "'"' co

**,~** 

# ...:m 

# -u" .,;_,

**~** 

# "'



# ~ m 

# z 0 

# x



# ~ 111



# ~ t:l 

# Method 1 -Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources (Circular Stack) Distance- Far Wall to Outside of Port (in) Distance
- Near Wall to Outside of Port (in) Inside Diameter of Stack (in) 63.00 4.25 Port Length 58.75

Port Diameter- For Ref. Only (in) 4.00 Distance to Upstream Disturbance (ft) 

# Distance to Downstream Disturbance (ft) Diameters Upstream Diameters Downstream Minimum Distance to Stack Wall (Default is 1 .0 inch) 20.00 

# 18.00 4.09 

# 3.68 1.00 Traverse Point Number 

# 1 2 

# 3 4 

# 5 6 

# 7 8 9 

# 10 11 

# 12 Conversion Table lor Decimal to Inch Fraction 1/16 1/8 3/16 1/4 5/16 

# 0.06 0.13 

# 0.19 0.25 

# 0,31 PROBE MARKINGS 

# Decimal inches Number of Traverse Points on a Diameter


# 2 4 

# 6 8 12.83 8.19 6.84 

# 6.13 54.42 

# 18.94 12.83 10.42 48.31 21.64 

# 15.65 59.06 

# 45.61 23.23 54.42 44.02 60.42 

# 51.60 56.83 61.12 

# 10 5.78 

# 9.07 12.83 17.53 24.34 42.91 49.72 54.42 

# 58.18 61.47 

# 3/8 0.38



# 12 5.48 

# 8.19 11.18 14.65 

# 18.94 

# 25.17 42.09 ' 48.31

52.60 

# 56.07 

# 59.06 61.77 

# "' 0 

# 52 r 

# "' ;u 

# 0 

# "' (I)BORAL BRICKS METAL EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS LOCATION: BORALBRICK SOURCE: DIFF Baghouse Outlet DATA Run#1 Run#2 Run tl3 AVERAGE DATE 09115110 09/15/10 09/15/10 RUN TIME (min) 60.00 60.00 60.00 Dn (in) 0.237 0.237 0.237 An (ft2} 3.06E-04 3.06E-04 3.06E-04 A VG DH (in H20) 0.99 0.96 0.95 P A TIVI (in Hg) 30.01 29.99 29.94 Pm (in Hg) 30.08 30.06 30.01 Ps(GAUGE)

0,22 0.22 0.22 Ps(IN HG) 30.03 30.01 29.96 Tm(F) 99.75 108.04 101.83 Tm(R) 559.44 567.73 561.52 Vm (ft3} 36.45 35.78 35.17 VmSTD(ft3)
33.31 32.19 31.94 VLQ (m/) 22.00 25.00 20.50 WSTD(ft3)

1.04 1.18 0.97 VSTD(ft3) 34.35 33.37 32.91 %M 3.02 3.53 2.94 3.16 %SVP' 100.00 100.00 100.00 MD 0.970 0.965 0.971 MWD 28.94 28.94 28.93 M 28.61 28.55 28.61 Ts(F) 251.46 254.67
257.54 254.56 Ts(R} 711.15 714.36 717.23
714.25 SUMSQRTDP
14.49 14.28 14.30 NDP 24.00 24.00 24.00 AVGSQRTDP

0.60 0.60 0.60 CP 0.84 0.84 0.84 Vs (ftfs) 39.44 39.03 39.15 39.20 Ds (In) 58.75 58.75 58.75 As (ft2} 18.83 18.83 18.83 QS, FLOW. ACFM 44,544 44,080 44,216 44,280 Q sm (ft31mln) 33,189 32,674 32,590 32,818 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM 32,188 31,520 31,633 31,780 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142 WT(gm) 0.0021 0.6231 0.0626 0.2293 %1 106.05 104.66 103.48 %C02
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 %02 19.47 19.47 19.23 19.39 %CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 %N2 79.53 79.53 79.77 1 Theoretical amount of moisture that rs can hold. lf%M>%SVP, %SVP wilt be utilized
in calculations. EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010
4';-:\: \

' '" l\ **~~** D· APPENDIX PAGE No. 34BORALBRICKSISOKINET!COATAANDCALCULATIONSDATE09115110SOURCEDIFFBaghouseOu!le!Run#1K=2.7052POINT#TmTsdpdHSQRTDPA1972450.401.080.632A2982460.401.080.632A3982460.381.030.616A4982470.371.000.608A5982480.350.950.592A69B2490.350.950.592A7992490.350.950.592A8992510.350.950.592A9992540.350.950.592MO992540.340.920.583A11992540.330.890.574A12992540.320.870.566B11002530.391.060.624821002540.391.060.624B31002550.381.030.616841002540.381.030.616851012540.391.060.624851012540.360.970.600871012530.360.970.600881022530.371.000.608891022520.371.000.608B101022520.371.000.6088111022520.350.950.5928121022520.350.950.59299.75251.460.360.9914.485Vm(ft3)Initial506.08Final542.53Total36.45ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010%02%C02APPENDIXPAGENo,35BORAL BRICKS ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS. DATE 09115/10 SOURCE

Dl FF Baghouse Outlet Run#2

K= 2.7070 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp
dH SQRTDP A1
105 254 0.39 1.06 0.624 A2
105 254 0.38 1.03 0.616 A3
106 254 0.38 1.03 0.616 A4
106 255 0.38 1.03 0.616 A5
106 255 0.37 1.00 0.608 A6
107 255 0.37 1.00 0.608 A7
107 255 0.37 1.00 0.608 A8
107 256 0.37 1.00 0.608 A9
107 256 0.37 1.00 0.608 A10
108 254 0.36 0.97 0.600 A11
108 253 0.34 0.92 0.583 A12
108 253 0.30 0.81 0.548 81
108 254 0.38 1.03 0.616 B2
108 254 0.37 1.00 0.608 BJ
109 253 0.36 0.97 0.600 B4
109 254 0.36 0.97 0.600 B5
109 255 0.34 0.92 0.583 86
110 255 0.34 0.92 0.583 B7
110 255 0.34 0.92 0.583 B8
110 256 0.34 0.92 0.583 B9
110 257 0.33 0.89 0.574 B10
110 257 0.33 0.89 0.574 B11
110 254 0.32 0.87 0.566 812
110 254 0.32 0.87 0.566 1013.()4 254.67 ().35 0.96 14.283 Vm(ft3) Initial 542.67 Rna! 578.45 Total 35.78 ATC PROJECT No. P·10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

%02 %C02 APPENDIX PAGE No. 36BORALBRICKSISOKINET!CDATAANDCALCULATIONSDATE09/15/10SOURCEDIFFBaghouseOutletRunlt3K=2.6759POINT#TmTsdpdHSQRTDPA11042580.401.070.632A21042580.401.070.632A31032580.370.990.608A41032580.370.990.608AS1032580.360.960.600A61032580.360.960.600A71032580.360.960.600A81032580.300.800.548A91032580.300.800.548A101022590.340.910.583A111022590.300.800.548A121022570.290.780.539811022600.391.040.624B21022590.391.040.624B31022580.391.040.624B41012570.381.020.616851012570.360.960.600Btl1012570:391.040.624871002570.370.990.608881002560.370.990.608B91002560.350.940.592B101002560.340.910.5838111002560.330.880.5748121002550.330.860.574101.83257.540.360.9514.3()1Vm(ft3)Initial578.59Final613.76Total35.17ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010%02%C02APPENDIXPAGENo.37Run#1 BEGINNING ENDING NET Run#2 BEGINNING ENDING NET Run#3 BEGINNING ENDING NET ATC PROJECT No. P-10142
BORAL BRICKS MOISTURE DATA Plant
4 9/1512010 1st Imp. 2ndfmp. 3rd/4th Imp. 100
100 200 110
100 200 10

0

0 1st Imp. 2nd imp. 3rd/4th Imp. 100
100 200 118
100 200 18

0

0 1st Imp. 2nd imp. 3rdl4th Imp. 100 100 200 114
100 200 14

0

0 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

5th Imp. TOTALS 300.0 312.0 12.0 22.0 !Sth Imp. TOTALS 300.0 307.0 7.0 25.0 5th Imp. TOTALS 300.0 306.5 6.5 20.S APPENDIX PAGE No. 38" " 0 **Au~.** GA. $/1612010 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142
BORAL BRICKS EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 42BORALBRICKS!SOKINETICSAMPLINGRATECALCULATIONThefollowingequationestablishes!herelationshipbetweenthevelocityheadpressuredifferentialandthedesiredcriticalorificepressuredrop.·MITheconstant,K,isdeterminedbythefollowingequation.!:lH=[846.72xD:x/).H:(1-BwstXJxflpMsT.PmModu/e/DDndH@Y,gammafactorCpBw(FRACTION,NOT"A.)MdPbarPS(GAUGE)Psrm,FTm,RMsTs,FTs,RPmKBORALBRICK9115/2010Run#1Run#2Run#3ATC3ATC3ATC30.2370.2370.2371.9371.9371.9370.9630.9630.9630.840.840.840.040.040.0429.029.029.030.0129.9929.940.220.220.2230.0330.0129.96100108102559.69567.69561.6928.5628.5628.56245255255704.69714.69714.6930.1230.0830.062.70522.70702.6759TerminologyMs=APPARENTSTACKGASMOLECULARWEIGHT=Md(1-Bw)+18BwMd=DRYGASMOLECULARWEIGHT(29)OR=(0.44*%C02)+(0.32*%02)+(0.28*(%N2+%CO))PsGAUGE=STACKSTATICPRESSURE(IN.H20)Ps=ABSOLUTESTACKPRESSURE(IN.Hg)Pm=METERABSOLUTEPRESSURE(IN.Hg)=Pbar+(avgdH/13.6)1Themethod5samplingtrainisintendedtooperateatasamplingrateof0.75elmofdryairat68oFand29.92in.Hg.Theorifice meterpressuredifferentialthatwouldproducesuchasamplingratelhrouahtheorificeisdesianaledasThetheoreticalno.,.zlecalculationisoptional.Ifthetesterfeelscomfortablechoosingthenozzlesizethroughothermeans(experience,priortesting,etc.),thisisalsoacceptable.On(theoretical)iscalculatedontheassumptionthata0.75cfmftowrateisachievedat68°Fand29.92in.Hg.ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.39BORALBRICKSSAMPLECALCULATIONSBORALBRICKAugusta,GARun#11}ABSOLUTEPRESSUREINDRYGASMETERPm:::PATM+AVGDH/13.6PATMAv9.DH30.010.992)ABSOlUTESTACKPRESSUREPs=PATM+Ps{GAUGE)/13.6PATMPs(GAUGE)30.010.22Pm30.08Ps30.033)SAMPLEVOLUMEATSTANDARDCONDITIONSVMSTD=(VM)'(Y)'(TSTDITM)"(PM/PSTD)VmTmy36.45559.440.963VmSTD33.31TSTD=PSTD=ft34)VOLUMEOFWATERCOLLECTED,CORRECTEDTOSTANDARDCONDITIONSWSTD=WSTOwtWSTDsgWSTOw=(.002673)'(VLQw)'(TSTD/PSTD)WSTOsg=(.002668)'VLQsg)'(TSTOlPSTD)WHERE0.002673=0.04707FT3/ML'IN.HG/17.64DEG.R.WHERE0.002668=0.04715FT3/G'IN.HG/17.64DEG.R.VLQ{w)10.00VLQ(sg)12.00WSTD1.04ft35)TOTALSAMPLEVOLUMEATSTANDARDCONDITIONSVSTD=VmSID+WSTO=6)PERCENTMOISTUREINSTACKGAS%M=(1OO)"(VVSTD)NSTD=7)MOLEFRACTIONOFDRYGAS0.970528DEGR.29.92IN.HGATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPlANTS4&5,SALISBURYPlANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.40BORAL BRICKS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS (continued) BORALBRICK Augusta, GA Run#1 8) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE DRY GAS MWO = **(%C02"0.44)+{02~0.32)+((%CO+%N2}"0.28)** %C02 %02 %CO 1.0 19.5

0.0 9) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE WET GAS M = (MWD)'(MD)

+ 18(1-MD)

=
%N2 79.5 WHERE
18 =MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF WATER, GiG-MOLE 10) STACK VELOCiiY VS = (85.4S)'(CP)"([f$1(PS)(M))"112'((SUM

SORT DP)/N DP)) where 85.49 = I!Jsec' [IMb-mole'in.HgY(deg.

R'in H20)]'0.5 CP 0.84 Ts(R) 711.15 SUM SORT 14.49 11) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE QS = (60)'(VS)'(AS) AS (Inlet) 18.83

NOP 24 QS 44,544 MWD 28.94 28.61
vs 39.44 12) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, STANDARD CONDITIONS INCLUDING MOISTURE Q STD = Q STD DRY/MD

33,189 13) STACK VOlUME FLOW RATE STANDARD CONDITIONS DRY Q STO DRY= 17.647'60'Md'Vs'A'(Ps/Ts(R))

= 32,188 14) POLLUTANT MASS RATE, CONCENTRATION BASIS PMRC

= (.1323)'(WT)'(Q STD)N STD WHERE 0.1323 =COMBINED CONVERSION FACTOR (60 MINIHR'0.00220 LBS/GRAM) WT(GRAMS) 0.0021 15) PERCENTISOKINETIC

PMRC 0.268 %1 = {0.09450*Ts*Vm **std)t{Ps"'Vs~An"Tlme"Md)** Run Tirne Area of Nozzle

%1 106.05 60 3.06E-()4 16) CONCENTRATION, GR/SCFD Cs::: 15.43 gr/gm WTNm STD Cs= 0.0010 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 41Metal Antimony (SO 7 440-3&.0 Arsenic (As 7 44Q..38-2} Barium (Ba 7440-39-3) Beryllium (Be 7440-41-7} Cadmium (Cd 7440-43-9} Chromium (Cr 7440-47-3) Cobalt (Co 7440-48-4) Copper (Cu 7 440-50-8) Magnesium {Mg 7439-95-4} Manganese (Mn 7439-96-5} Mereury (Hg 7439-97-6) Nickel (Ni 7440-02-0) · Phosphorus

{P 7723-14-0) Selenium {Se n82-49-2) Silver {Ag 7440-22-4) Thallium (TI7440-28-0) Zinc {Zn 744Q..66-6) ATC PROJECT No. P-10142
BORAL BRICKS Multiple Metals Emission Rate Summary Client: Bora! Bricks Location: Augusta, GA Date: 9/1512010 Source: Plant
4 Outlet lbs/hr kg/hr 3.21E-04 1.46E-04 1.60E-04 7.28E-05 1.81E-03 8.23E-04 1.60E-05 7.28E-06 9.71E-05 4.41E-05 4.10E-04 1.86E-04 2.26E-04 1.03E-04 2.59E-04 1.17E-04 9.43E-04 4.28E-04 4.54E-04 2.06E-04 5.08E-04 2.30E-04 3.30E-04 1.49E-04 4.91E-03 2.23E-03 321E-04 1.46E-04 1.60E-04 7.28E-05 1.60E-04 7.28E-05 l.OOE-03 4.55E-04 kg/Mg of Product 7.84E-07 3.92E-07 4.42E-06 3.92E-08 2.37E-07 i.OOE-06 5.55E-07 6.31E-07 2.33E-06 1.11E-06 1.24E-06 8.06E-07 1.20E-05 7.84E-07 3.92E-07 3.92E-07 2.45E-06 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 mgfdscm 2.61E-03 1.30E-03 1.48E-02 1.30E-04 7.90E-04 3.34E-03 1.84E-03 2.10E-03 7.60E-03 3.69E-03 4.13E-03 2.68E-03 3.99E-02 2.61E-03 1.30E-03 1.30E-03 8.15E-03 mgldsem

@ 7% 02 2.39E-02 1.19E-02 1.35E-01 1.19E-03 7.23E-03 3.05E-02 1.68E-02 1.92E-02 6.95E-02 3.38E-02 3.78E-02 2.45E-02 3.65E-01 2.39E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 7.46E-02 APPENDIX PAGE No. 43BORAL BRICKS ANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS,
INC. Initial Source Survey Test Date 09/16/to Company BORAL BRICK Address City, State AUGUSTA, GA Process Tasted DIFF Baghouse Outlet Specific Source Plant
4 Air Pollution Controls DIFF Baghouse Outlet Test Methods USEPA M23 ATC PROJECT No, P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 53

# ~ -u 

# 2

**~** :z ? 

# :!; 

# '" " "' 

# § em



# ~~ )>0 

# "'""' qjS::m -l:Z'S: 

# m-100 

# .::"'"' 

# "'


# ... 

# - m"'o 

# "'"'"

- -< 

# "'com

**~)>00** 

# or-<



# (ii-u 

# "'"' c:o :U'- 

# -<m .,o 

# s:;-< 

# :"! 

# "'

l;; 

# " m 

# :z 0 

# x



# ~ m 

# z ? 

# "' 

# .. Method 1 - Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources (Circular Stack) Distance· Far Wall to Outside 

# of Port (in) 

# Distance • Near Wall 

# to Outside 

# of Port 

# (in) Inside Diameter of Stack (in) 

# 63.00 4.25 Port Length 58.75

Port Diameter· For Ref. Only (in) 4.00 Distance to Upstream Disturbance 

# (ft) Distance to Downstream Disturbance 

# (ft) Diameters Upstream Diameters Downstream Minimum Distance to Stack Wall (Default is 1. 0 inch) 

# 20.00 18.00 

# 4.09 3.68 1.00 Traverse Point Number 

# 1 2 

# 3 4 5 

# 6 7 

# 8 9 

# 10 11 

# 12

Conversion Table for Decimal to Inch Fraction 1/16 1/8 3/16 1/4 5116 0.06 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 

# PROBE MARKINGS Decimal Inches Number of Traverse Points on a Diameter



# 2 

# 4 6 

# 8 12.83 8.19 6.84 6.13 54.42 18.94 12.83 10.42 48.31 21.64 15.65 

# 59.06 45.61 23.23 54.42 

# 44.02 60.42 51.60 

# 56.83 61.12 

# 10 5.78 9.07 

# 12.83 17.53 24.34 42.91 49.72 54.42 58.18 61.47 3/8 

# 0.38



# 12 5.48 8.19 

# 11.18 14.65 18.94 25.17 42.09 48.31 52.60 56.07 

# 59.06 61.77 

# "' 0 

# 5: r 

# "' 2l 0 

# " "'

## BORAL BRICKS 

# DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS I.OCAT/ON: BORAL BRICK SOURCE: DIFF Baghouse Outlet DATA Run #1 Run#2 Run #3 AVERAGE DATE 

## 09116110 09/16110 09/16/10 RUN TIME (min} 

## 240.00 240.00 

## 240.00 Dn (In) 

## 0.237 

## 0.237 0.237 An (ft2) 

## 3.06E-04 3.06E·04 3.06E-04 A VG DH (In 1120)


## 0.89 0.91 0.91 P ATM (in Hg) 

## 30.16 29.88 

## 29.77 Pm (In Hg) 

## 30.23 29.95 29.84 Ps(GAUGE)



## 0.22 0.22 0.22 Ps(IN IJG) 

## 30.18 29.90 29.79 Tm(F) 

## 77.15 95.19 98.31 Tm(R) 

## 536.84 554.88 558.00 Vm (ft3) 

## 134.36 138.63 135.63 VmSTD(ft3) 

## 128.55 127.15 123.25 VLQ(ml} 

## 76.50 78.40 78.40 WSTD(ft3}



## 3.61 3.70 3.70 VSTD {ft3) 

## 132.16 130.85 126.94 %M 

## 2.73 2.83
2.91 

## 2.82 %SVP

1 

## 100.00 100.00 100.00 MD 

## 0.973 0.972 0.971 MWD 

## 28.97 28.98 29.00 M 

## 28.67 28.67 28.68 Ts(F} 

## 244.98 248.58 

## 253.48 249-01 

## Ts(R} 

## 704.67 708.27 713.17 708.70 SUMSQRTDP


## 28.28 28.26 28.00 NDP 

## 48.00 48.00 48.00 AVGSQRTDP



## 0.59 0.59 0.58 CP 

## 0.84 0.84 0.84 Vs (fils} 

## 38.19 38.43 38.27 38.30 Ds (in) 

## 58.75 58.75 58.75 As 

## (ft2J 18.83 18.83

18.83 QS, FLOW. ACFM 

## 43,133 43,412 43,232



## 43,259 Q 

## STD (ft3fmin) 

## 32,596 32,337 31,864


## 32,265 Q 

## STD DRY, FLOW SCFM 

## 31,706 31,423 30.935 

## 31,355 WT(gm) 

## O.OOE+OO 1.73E-14 

## 5.97E·14 0.0000 %1 

## 103.88 103.67 102.06 %C02
1.20 1.30 1.50 1.33 

## %02 19.41 19.40 19.10 

## 19.30 %CO 

## 0.00 0.00 0.00 %N2 

## 79.39 "19.30 79.40 DIP (lbslhr) 

## O.OOE+OO 5.66E-13 1.98E-12 8.49E-13 DIF(kglhrJ 

## O.OOE+OO 2.57E-13 8.99E-13 

## 3.85E-13 Production (tph) 

## 4.82 4.82 4.82 4.82E+OO Production (Mg) 

## 2.19E-03 2.19E-03 2.19E-03 2.19E-ll3 DIF (kg/Mg of Product) 

## O.OOE+OO 7.913E·15 2.731E-14 

## 1.17E·14 DIF (ngldscm) 

## O.OOOE+OO 4.B04E-06 1.710E-05 

## 7.30E-06 DIP (ngldscm@
7% 

## 02) 

## O.OOE+OO 4.45E-05 1.32E-04 

## 5.89E-05 QS, 

## FLOW, ACMIVI


## 1221 

## 1229 1224 

## 1225 QS, 

## FLOW, DSCMM



## 898


## 890
876 

## 888 1 

### Theoretical amount of moisture that 

### Ts can hold. If %M>%SVP, %SVP will be utilized
in calcu!atlons. 

## ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 

## 5, SALISBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 55BORAL BRICKS !SOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09/18/10 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet Run#1

K= 2.5720 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1

64 245 0.37 0.95 0.608 19.5
1.2 AI

64 245 0.37 0.95 0.608 A2

64 245 0.38 0.98 0.616 A2

65 246 0.38 0.98 0.618 A3

65 247 0.36 0.93 0.600 A3

66 248 0.36 0.93 0.600 A4

66 250 0.35 0.90 0.592 A4

67 250 0.35 0.90 0.592 A5

68 251 0.34 0.87 0.583 A5

68 252 0.34 0.87 0.583 A6

69 252 0.32 0.82 0.566 A6

70 252 0.32 0.82 0.566 A7

71 252 0.36 0.93 0.600 A7

72 251 0.36 0.93 0.600 A8

72 249 0.32 0.82 0.566 A8

72 247 0.32 0.82 0.566 A9

72 245 0.32 0.82 0.556 A9

73 244 0.32 0.82 0.586 MO

73 244 0.30 0.77 0.548 MO

74 244 0.30 0.77 0.548 A11

75 242 0.30 0.77 0.548 A11

76 242 0.30 0.77 0.548 A12

77 242 0.29 0.75 0.539 A12

78 242 0.29 0.75 0.539 81

79 241 0.37 0.95 0.608 81

80 241 0.37 0.95 0.608 82

80 241 0.39 1.00 0.624 82

80 241 0.39 1.00 0.624 83

81 243 0.38 0.98 0.616 83

81 243 0.38 0.98 0.616 84

82 243 0.40 1.03 0.832

t;t;;- _) 84

82 243 0.40 1.03 0.632 85

83 244 0.40 1.03 0.632 85

64 244 0.40 1.03 0.632 86

84 244 0.35 0.90 0.592
(7.._ 86

84 245 0.35 0.90 0.592
2"· ./ 87

84 242 0.32 0.82 0.566 87

85 244 0.32 0.82 0.566 88

85 243 0.37 0.95 0.608

**~~{** 88

85 245 0.37 0.95 0.608 D.;, 89

86 245 0.37 0.95 0.608 89

86 245 0.37 0.95 0.608 6Ctl 810

88 245 0.35 0.90 0.592 810

88 243 0.35 0.90 0.592

bS 811

88 242 0.34 0.87 0.583

/ 811

89 242 0.34 0.87 0.583

\ S,s 812

89 242 0.30 0.77 0.548 812

89 241 0.30 0.77 0.548 77.15 244.98 0.35 0.89 28.282 19.50 1.20 corrected per 7e..5b 19.41 Vm(ft3} Initial 618.11

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)
79.39 Final 752.45 Total 134.36 %Excess Air 1250.48 **.--"!>::'2~** •. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT APPENDIX PAGE No. 56 AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010BORAl BRICKS ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09/16/10 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet Run#2

K= 2.6175 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp
dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1

85 238 0.36 0.94 0.600 19.4
1.3 A1

85 247 0.36 0.94 0.600 A2

86 246 0.40 1.05 0.632 A2

86 245 0.40 1.05 0.632 A3

87 247 0.40 1.05 0.632 A3

88 250 0.40 1.05 0.632 A4

88 250 0.36 0.99 0.616 A4

88 251 0.38 0.99 0.616 A5

88 250 0.36 0.94 0.600 AS

88 250 0.36 0.94 0.600 A6

88 249 0.34 0.89 0.583 A8

88 247 0.34 0.89 0.583 A7

89 247 0.30 0.79 0.548 A7

89 246 0.30 0.79 0.548 A8

90 245 0.35 0.92 0.592 A8

91 245 0.35 0.92 0.592 A9

92 245 0.32 0.84 0.566 A9

92 245 0.32 0.84 0.568 A10

92 246 0.33 0.86 0.574 A10

93 246 0.33 0.86 0.574 A11

93 247 0.30 0.79 0.548 A11

94 245 0.30 0.79 0.548 A12

94 245 0.28 0.73 0.529 A12

94 245 0.28 0.73 0.529 81

94 245 0.38 0.99 0.616 81

94 245 0.38 0.99 0.616 82

94 246 0.39 1.02 0.624 82

94 247 0.39 1.02 0.624 83

95 245 0.39 1.02 0.624 83

97 245 0.39 1.02 0.624 84

99 248 0.37 0.97 0.808 84

99 249 0.37 0.97 0.608 85
100 251 0.37 0.97 0.608 85

101 252 0.37 0.97 0.608 86
102 252 0.34 0.89 0.583 BB
102 252 0.34 0.89 0.583 87
102 252 0.33 0.86 0.574 87
102 253 0.33 0.86 0.574 88
103 252 0.34 0.89 0.583 88
103 251 0.34 0.89 0.583 89
103 251 0.32 0.84 0.566 89
103 250 0.32 0.84 0.566 810
104 254 0.33 0.86 0.574 810
106 254 0.33 0.86 0.574 811
106 255 0.36 0.94 0.600 811
106 256 0.36 0.94 0.600 812
106 256 0.30 0.79 0.548 812
106 254 0.30 0.79 0.548 95.19 248.58 0.35 0.91 28.263 19.40 1.30 corrected per
1 e-5b 19.40 Vm(ft3} Initial 752.54

% 1'12 (BY DIFFERENCE)
79.30 Final 891.17 Total 138.63 %Excess Air 1263.68 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 57BORALBRICKSMOISTUREDATAPlant49/16/2010Run#11stlmp.2ndimp.3rdImp.BEGINNING1001000ENDING1641040NET6440Run#21stImp.2ndlmp.3rdImp.BEGINNING1001000ENDING1541180NET54180Run#3tstlmp.2ndImp.3rdImp.BEGINNING1001000lENDING154 1180NET54180ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER20104thImp.TOTALS300.0308.58.576.54111Imp.TOTALS300.0306.46.478.44thImp.TOTALS300.0306.46.478.4APPENDIXPAGENo.58BORAL BRICKS ISOKINETIC SAMPUNG RATE CALCULATION The following equation establishes the relationship between the velocity head pressure differential and the desired critical orifice pressure drop. t.Jl = K X !J..p The constant,

K, is determined

by Mf = [846. 72 x **D,~** x Ml@

X c! (1- Bws

) 2 x MdTmP.
J x !:.p MsJ'.Pm BORALBRICK Modu!e!D Dn dH@ Y, gamma factor Cp Bw(FRACTION,NOT%)

Md Pbar PS(GAUGE) Ps Terminology Tm,F Tm,R Ms Ts,F Ts,R Pm K 9116/2010 Run #1 ATC3 0.237 1.937 0.963 0.84 0.04 29.0 30.16 0.22 30.18 80 539.69 28.56 255 714.69 30.27 2.5720 Run #2 ATC3 0.237 1.937 0.963 0.84 O.G4 29.0 29,88 0.22 29.90 90 549.69 28.56 250 709.69 30.23 2.6175 Run 113 ATC3 0.237 1.937 0.963 0.84 0.04 29.0 29.77 0.22 29.79 100 559.69 28,56 250 709.69 29.95 2.6801 Ms=APPARENT STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT =Md(1-Bw)+18Bw Md=DRY GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT (29) OR =(0.44'%C02)•(0.32*%02)+(0.28'(%N2+%CO)) Ps GAUGE=STACK STATIC PRESSURE (IN. H20) Ps=ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE (IN. Hg) Pm=METER ABSOLUTE PRESSURE (IN. Hg) = Pbar
+ (avg dH/13.6) 1 The method

5 sampling train is intended
to operate at a sampling rate of 0.75 cfm of dry air at 68 oF and 29.92 in. Hg. The orifice meter pressure differential that would produce such
a sampling rate through the orifice
is designated

as I!H@. The theoretical nozzle calculation

is optional.

If the tester feels comfortable choosing the nozzle size through other means (experience, prior testing, etc.), this is also acceptable.
Dn (theoretical)

is calculated
on the assumption that a 0.75 elm flowrate

is achieved
at 68 °F and 29.92 in. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

Hg. EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 59BORALBRICKSSAMPLECALCULATIONSBORALBRICKAUGUSTA,GARun#11)ABSOLUTEPRESSUREINDRYGASMETERPm=PATM+AVGDH/13.6PATMAvg.DH30.160.892)ABSOLUTESTACKPRESSUREPs=PATM+Ps(GAUGE)/13.6PATMPs(GAUGE)30.160.22Pm30.23Ps30.183)SAMPLEVOLUMEATSTANDARDCONDITIONSVMSTD=(VM)'(Y)'{TSTDfTM)'(PMIPSTD)VmTmyVmSTDTSTD=PSTD=134.36536.840.963123.55ft34)VOLUMEOFWATERCOLLECTED,CORRECTEDTOSTANDARDCONDITIONSWSTD=WSTOw+WSTDsgWSTOw=(.002673)'(VLOw)'(TSTOlPSTD)WSTDsg=(.002668)'\/LQsg)'{TSTDIPSTD)WHERE0.002673=0.04707FT31ML'IN.HG/17.64DEG.R.WHERE0.002668•0.04715FT31G'IN.HGI17.64DEG.R.VLQ(w)68.00VLQ(sg)8.50WSTD3.61ft35)TOTALSAMPLEVOLUMEATSTANDARDCONDITIONSVSTD=VmSTD+WSTD=132.1Sft36)PERCENTMOISTUREINSTACKGAS%M=(100)"(WSTD)NSTD=2.73.%7)MOLEFRACTIONOFDRYGASMD==0.973528DEGR.29.92IN.HGATCPROJECTNo.P-1()142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.60BORALBRICKSANALYTICALTESTINGCONSULTANTS,INC.lnltlalSourceSurveyTestDate09116/10CompanyBORAlBRICKAddressCity,StatePlant4ProcessTestedDryerSpecificSourceDryerAirPollutionControlsTestMethodsUSEPAM23ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.61

# , **~** "0 

# :0 

# 2 

# a

**~** 

# !: :1 t;



# § em

**~;g** 

# "'"11 

# cn":O 

# m:;;m

**~zs::** 

# m-IW 

# ;;:"'"' oo"'- m"'o ;u<nz



# - -< 

# "'cnm

**~)>(/)** 

# or -I



# [i;-o 

# roll 

# co

**~ffi** 

# ...,o 

# :;;-I z -< 

# "'



# , "0 

# ..., m 

# z CJ 

# x



# ~ m 

# z ? 

# "' N 

# Method 1 - Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources (Circular Stack) Distance
- Far Wall to Outside of Port (in) Distance- Near Wall to Outside of Port (in) Inside Diameter of Stack (in)

Port Diameter- For Ref. Only (in) Distance to Upstream Disturbance (ft) Distance to Downstream Disturbance (It) Diameters Upstream Diameters Downstream Minimum Distance to Stack Wall (Default Is 1.0 inch) 52.00 0.00 Port Length 52.00

4.00 10.00 5.00 2.31 1.15 

# 1.00 Traverse Point Number 1 

# 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 

# 10 11 

# 12 Conversion Table for Decimal to Inch Fraction 1116 118 

# 3/16 1/4 5116 3/8 

# 0.06 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.38 PROBE MARKING$ 

# Decimal inches Number of Traverse Points on a Oiameter ;,)\-, 

# 2 4 6 

# 8 10 12 7.59 3.48 2.29 1.66 1.35 1.09 44.41 13.00 7.59 5.46 4.26 3.48 39.00 15.39 10.09 7.59 6.14 48.52 36.61 16.80 11.75. 9.20 44.41 35.20 17.78 13.00 

# 49.71 41.91 34.22 18.51 

# "' 46.54 40.25 33.49



# ~ 50.34 44.41 

# 39.00 r 

# 47:74 

# 42.80 

# !ll 50.65 45.86



# ~ 48.52 "' 50.91BORALBRICKSISOKINETICDATAANDCALCULATIONSDATE09118/10SOURCEDryerRun#1POINT#TmA177A178A278A278A381A382M82A482AS82A582A682A882A782A782A882A882A982A982A1082A1082A1183A1183A1283A1283B183B18382838283B383B383B48384848584B5848684868487848784888488848984898481(}84810848118481184812848128482.56Vm(tt3)ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142K=2.4076rsdpdHSQRTDP1220.651.560.8061220.651.560.8061220.661.590.8121220.661.590.8121220.661.590.8121220.661.590.8121220.681.640.8251220.681.640.8251220.741.780.8601220.741.780.8601220.741.780.6601220.741.780.8601220.741.780.6601220.741.780.8601220.75'1.810.8661220.751.810.8661220.751.810.6661220.751.810.8661220.761.830.8721220.761.830.8721220.771.850.8771220.771.850.8771220.761.830.8721220.761.830.8721220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.6631220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.781.880.8831220.751.810.8661220.751.810.866122.000.751.8041.541Initial467.99Final641.43Total173.44EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010%02%C0220.90.020.900.00APPENDIXPAGENo.64BORAL BRICKS !SOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09116/10 SOURCE Dryer Run#2 POINT#

Tm A1

82 A1

82 A2

82 A2

82 A3

82 A3

82 A4

82 A4

82 A5

82 A5

82 A5

82 A6

82 A7

82 A7

82 A8

82 A8

82 A9

83 A9

83 A10

83 Mil

83 A11

83 A11

83 A12

83 A12

83 81

84 81

84 B2

84 82

84 83

84 83

84 84

84 84

84 85

84 85

84 88

85 86

85 87

85 87

85 88

85 88

85 89

87 89

87 810

87 810

87 811

87 811

88 812

88 812

88 83.85 Vm(ft3) ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

K= 2.4058 Ts
dp dH SQRTDP 124 0.66 1.59 0.812 124 0.66 1.59 0.812 124 0.66 1.59 0.812 124 0.66 1.59 0.812 124 0.66 1.59 0.812 124 0.66 1.59 0.812 124 0.66 1.59 0.812 124 0.66 1.59 0.812 124 0.72 1.73 0.849 124 0.72 1.73 0.849 124 0.72 1.73 0.849 124 0.72 1.73 0.849 124 0.72 1.73 0.849 124 0.72 1.73 0.849 124 0.76 1.83 0.872 124 0.76 1.83 0.872 124 0.76 1.83 0.872 124 0.76 1.83 0.872 124 0.76 1.83 0.872 124 0.76 1.83 0.872 124 0.76 1.83 0.872 124 0.76 1.83 0.872 124 0.76 1.83 0.872 124 0.76 1.83 0.872 124 0.77 1.85 0.877 124 0.77 1.85 0.877 124 0.79 1.90 0.889 124 0.79 1.90 0.889 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.60 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.80 1.92 0.894 124 0.78 1.88 0.883 124 0.78 1.88 0.883 124 0.78 1.88 0.883 124 0.78 1.88 0.883 124.00 0.76 1.82 41.684 lnitial 842.37 Final 818.41 Total 176.04 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

%02 %C02 20.9
0.0 20.90 0.00 APPENDIX PAGE No. 65BORAL BRICKS ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE

. 09/16/10 SOURCE Dryer Run#3 POINT#

Tm A1

87 A1

87 A2

87 A2

87 A3

87 A3

87 A4

87 A4

87 AS

87 A5

87 116

87 A$

87 117

87 AT

87 A8

86 A8

86 A9

86 A9

86 1110

86 A10

86 A11

86 A11

86 A12

86 A12

86 81

86 81

86 82

86 82

86 83

86 83

86 84

86 84

86 85

86 85

86 86

86 BB

86 87

86 87

86 88

86 88

86 89

85 89

85 810

85 810

85 811

85 811

85 812

85 812

85 86.13 Vm(ft3) ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

K= 2.4057 Ts
dp dH SQRTDP 124 0.65 1.56 0.806 124 0.65 1.56 0.806 124 0.65 1.56 0.806 124 0.65 1.56 0.606 124 0.66 1.59 0.812 124 0.66 1.59 0.812 124 0.67 1.61 0.819 124 0.67 1.61 0.819 124 0.67 1.61 0.819 124 0.67 1.61 0.819 124 0.74 1.78 0.860 124 0.74 1.78 0.860 124 0.74 1.78 0.660 124 0.74 1.78 0.860 124 0.74 1.78 0.860 124 0.74 1.78 0.860 124 0.77 1.85 0.877 124 0.77 1.85 0.877 124 0.77 1.85 0.877 124 0.77 1.85 0.877 124 0.77 1.85 0.877 124 0.77 1.85 0.877 124 0.77 1.65 0.877 124 0.77 1.85 0.877 124 0.77 1.85 0.877 124 0.77 1.85 0.877 123 0.77 1.85 0.877 123 0.77 1.85 0.877 123 0.82 1.97 0.906 123 o,82 1.97 0.906 123 0.82 1.97 0.906 123 0.82 1.97 0.906 123 0.82 1.97 0.906 123 0.82 1.97 0.906 122 0.82 1.97 0.906 122 0.82 1.97 0.906 122 0.82 1.97 0.906 122 0.82 1.97 0.906 122 0.82 1.97 0.906 122 0.82 1.97 0.906 122 0.82 1.97 0.906 122 0.82 1.97 0.906 122 0.80 1.92 0.894 122 0.80 1.92 0.894 122 0.80 1.92 0.894 122 0.80 1.92 0.894 122 0.78 1.88 0.883 122 0.78 1.88 0.883 123.25 11.76 1.83 41.837 Initial 818.52 Final 998.24 Total 177.72 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

%02 %C02 20.9
0.0 20.90 0.00 APPENDIX PAGE No, 66BORAL BRICKS DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS LOCATION: BORALBRICK SOURCE: Dryer DATA Run#1 Run#2

Run 113 AVERAGE DATE 09/16/10 09116110 09116/10 RUN TIME (min) 240.00 240.00 240.00 Dn (in) 0.220 0.220 0.220 An (fl2) 2.64E-04 2.64E.04 2.64E-04 AVG DH (In H2D)
1.80 1.82 1.83 PATM(InHg)
30.16 30.16 30.16 Pm(lnHg) 30.29 30.29 30.29 Ps(GAUGE)

0.10 0.10 0.10 Ps(/NHG) 30.17 30.17 30.17 Tm(F) 82.56 83.85 85.13 Tm(R) 642.25 543.54 545.82 Vm (ft3) 173.44 176.04 177.72 VmSTD(ft3) 170.97 173.12 174.06 VLQ(ml} 134.00 137.00 139.00 VV STD(ft3}
6.32 6.46 6.56 V STD(ft3) 177.29 179.58 180.61 %M 3.56 3.60 3.63 %SVP

1 12.06 12.74 12.48 MD 0.964 0.964 0.964 MWD 28.84 28.84 28.84 M 28.45 28.45 28.44 Ts(F) 122.00 124.00 123.25 Ts(R} 581.69 583.69 582.94 SUMSQRTDP
41.54 41.68 41.84 NDP 46.00 48.00 48.00 A'IGSQRTDP

0.87 0.87 0.87 CP 0.84 0.64 0.84 Vs (ftls) 51.16 51.43 51.59 Ds (In) 52.00 52.00 52.00 As (ft2) 14.74 14.74 14.74 QS, FLOW. ACFM 45,251 45,489 45,628 Q STD (ft31min) 41,414 41.489
41.670 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM 39,938 39,996
40,157 WT(gm) 7.46E-13 7.72E-14 6.53E-14 %1 99.66 100.77 100.90 %C02
0.00 0.00 0.00 %02 20.90 20.90 20.90 %CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 %N2 79.10 79.10 79.10 DIF (lbslhr) 2.31E-11 2.36E-12 1.99E-12 DIF(kglhr) 1.05E-11 1.07E·12 9.o4E-13 Production (tph) 4.82 4.82 4.82 Production (Mg) 2.19E·03 2.19E-03 2.19E-03 DIF (kg/Mg of Product) 3.4121E-13 3.531E-14 2.987E-14 DIF (ngldscm) 1.541E·04 1.575E·05 1.325E·05 OfF (ngldscm@
7% 02)
N/A
NIA
N/A QS, FLOW. ACMM
1281 1288 1292 QS, FLOW, DSCMM
1131 1133 1137 1 Thooretical amount of moisture that Ts can hold. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

If %M>%SVP, !Y!>SVP will be uttJJzed
In cafculations. * Ambient oxygen concentrations, calculation not vafid EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

**o~·t** \ j "- () "110 L• '\ **~'i** I v \_.] 3.60 123.08 582.77 51.40 45,455 41,524 40,030 2.96E-13 0.00 20.90 9.14E-12 4.14E·12 4.82E+OO 2.19E-03 1.35E-13 6.10E.05 NIA' 1287 1133 APPENDIX PAGE No. 63BORAL BRICKS MOISTURE DATA Dryer 9116/2010 Run#1

1st Imp. 2nd imp. BEGINNING

100
100 ENDING

212
100 NET
112

0 Run#2

1st Imp. 2ndlmp. BEGINNING

100
100 ENDING

220
100 NET
120

0 Run#J 1stlmp. 2nd Imp. Bl:GINN!NG

100
100 ENDING

222
100 NET
122

0 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

3rd Imp; 4th Imp. TOTALS 0 300.0 10 312.0 10 12.0 134.0 3rd Imp. 4/h Imp. TOTALS 0 300.0 6 311.0 6 11.0 137.0 3rd Imp. 4/h Imp. TOTALS 0 300.0 8 309.0 8 9.0 139.0 APPENDIX PAGE No. 67BORAL BRICKS ISO KINETIC SAMPLING RATE CALCUlATION The following equation establishes the relationship between the velocity head pressure differential and the desired critical orifice pressure drop. The constant,

K, is determined

by the following equation. !VI -Kxtip Mi =[ 846.72xD: xMi@ xc!(l-BwS

x **~:i~** JxL\p Module!D Dn dH@ Y, gamma factor Cp Bw(FRACTION,NOT%)

Md Pbar PS(GAUGE) Ps Tm,F Tm,R Ms **Ts~F** TsrR Pm K Terminology BORALBRICK 9/16/2010 Run#1 ATC

1 0.220 1.980 1.000 0.84 0.04 29.0 30.16 0.10 30.17 85 544.69 28.56 125 584.69 30.27 2.4076 Run#2 Run #3 ATC

1 ATC

1 0.220 0.220 1.980 1.980 1.000 1.000 0.84 0.84 0.04 0.04 29.0 29.0 30.16 30.16 0.10 0.10 30.17 30.17 85

85 544.69 544.69 28.56 28.56 125
125 584.69 584.69 30.29 30.29 2.4058 2.4057 **Ms~APPARENT** STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT =Md(1-Bw)+18Bw **Md~DRY** GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT (29) OR **~(0.44'%C02)+(0.32'%02)+(0.28.(%N2+%CO))** Ps GAUGE=STACK STATIC PRESSURE (IN. H20) Ps=ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE {IN. Hg) Pm=METER ABSOLUTE PRESSURE {IN. Hg) Pbar
+ (avg dH/13.6) 1 The method

5 sampling train is intended
to operate
at a sampling rate of 0. 75 cfm of dry air at 68 oF and 29.92 in. Hg. The orifice meter pressure differential that would produce such
a sampling rate through the orifice is designated

as IIH@. The theoretical nozzle calculation

is optional.

If the tester feels comfortable choosing the nozzle size through other means (experience, prior testing, etc.), this Is also acceptable.
Dn (theoretical)

is calculated
on the assumption thai a 0.75 cfm flowrate
is achieved
at 68 "F and 29.92 in. Hg. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 68BORAL BRICKS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS BORALBRICK Plant4 Run#1 1) ABSOLUTE PRESSURE

IN DRY GAS METER Pm = P ATM
+ AVG DH/13.6 PATM Avg. DH 30.16 1.80 2) ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE Ps = PATM

+ Ps(GAUGE)/13.6 PATM Ps(GAUGE) 30.16

0.1
Pm 30.29 Ps 30.17 3) SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS VM STD = (VM)'(Y)"(T STDfTM)'(PMIP STD) Vm
Tm

y VmSTD TSTD= PSTD= 173.44 542.25 1.000 170.97
ft3 4) VOLUME OF WATER COllECTED, CORRECTED
TO STAI\!DARO CONDITIONS W STD = W STOw+ WSTDsg W STDw
= (.002673)'(VLQw)"(T STD/P STD) W STDsg

= (.00266S)'VlQsg)'(T STDIP STD) WHERE 0.002673

= 0.04707 Ff3/ML'IN. HG/17.64 DEG. R. WHERE 0.002658

= 0.04715 FT3IG'IN.HGJ17.64 DEG. R. VLQ(w) 122.00 VLQ

(sg) 12.00 WSTD 6.32
ft3 5) TOTAL SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS V STD =Vm STD+ WSTD

= 177.29 ft3 6) PERCENT MOISTURE

IN STACK GAS %M

• (100)'(VV STD)N STD = 3.56% 1) MOLE FRACTION OF DRY GAS MD

• (100-%M)/100

•

o.9S4

528 DEG R. 29.92 IN. HG ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS 4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 69BORALBRICKSSAMPLECALCULATIONS(continued)BORALBRICKPlant4Run#18)MOLECULARWEIGHTOFTHEDRYGASMWD=(%C02"0.44H02"0.32)+((%CO+%N2)1l.28)0/oC02%02%CO0.00.09)MOLECULARWEIGHTOFTHEWETGASM=(MWO)'(MO)+18(1-MD)=0/oN279.1WHERE18=MOLECULARWEIGHTOFWATER,GIG-MOLE10)STACKVELOCITYVS=(85.49)'(CP)'((TS/(PS)(M))'112"((SUMSORTDP)INDP))where85.49=f!lsec"Ubllb-mo!e"ln.Hg)/(deg.R"inH20)j"'.5CP0.84Ts(R)581.69SUMSQRT41.5411)STACKVOLUMETRICFLOWRATEQS=(Sll)"(VS)"(AS)AS(lnleQ14.74NDP48QS45,251MWD28.342B.45VS51.1$12)STACKVOLUMETRICFLOWRATE,STANDARDCONDITIONSINCLUDINGMOISTUREQSTD=QSTDDRY/MD41,41413)STACKVOLUMEFLOWRATESTANDARDCONDITIONSDRYQSTDDRY•17.647"60"Md'Vs"N(Pslfs{R))=39,93814)POLLUTANTMASSRATE,CONCENTRATIONBASISPMRC={.1323)"(WT).(QSTD)NSTDWHERE0.1323•COMBINEDCONVERSIONFACTOR(60MINIHR"0.00220LBSIGRAM)Wf(GRAMS)0.000015)PERCENT!SOKINETICPMRC0.000%1=(0.09450'Ts-"Vmstd)/(Ps"Vs'"An"'Time"Md)RunTimeAreaofNozzle2402.64E-04ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142%!99.66EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4 &5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.70

# ::; 0 "1J 

# ;o 0

**~** 

# m <:1 z 0 

# I: 

# s 

# " N



# , c Glm 

# c,

**~)>** 

# :Po "'1l;o 

# m\:m 

# -uz;::-1-jmCiltn 

# S:.r.,fa



# ~~~ ;o 

# 5Jl -i 

# "'Cilm

**~);>00** 

# or- -I



# Oi1l 

# "'" co

**;o~** 

# ..:m 

# -oo \:-1 

# z -1 

# "'

)> 

# :;: m 

# z 0 

# x



# ~ m 

# z ? 

# :1 POI.l\JTANT 

# PM HCI HCI 

# "' "' 

# "' Cl2 OIOXIN/f!JAAN ANTIMONY jSb 7440-BG-01 

# ARSENIC 

# (A.s 74<1o-3a·2) BARIUM {58 7440-;1$-3} 6Efl.'iWUM 

# (&s! 7440-.41·7) CADMIUM (Cd 7440-43-9) 

# CHROMIUM {Cl' 

# 7440-47·3) CO!.W.T {Co 7441).46-4) COPPER (CU 7440·50-B} 

# t.tAD {Pb 7439'·92·1) MAGNESIUM (Mg 7439-95-4) MANGANESE {Mo 7439--!16-5} Mereu I"{ 

# {Hs 7439--97-6) 

# NlCKa (N! 7440·02-0) PHOSPHORUS (P 

# 1723-14-0) SEI.ENIUM 

# !Se n82-49-2) 

# SILVER 

# (Ag 7440·22-4) THAU.IUM {TI7.:!40-28oOj 

# ZINC {Zn7440--66-6)

**T~taiMeta!s** 

# 0\FF 8AGHOUSE INUIT 

# UNITS RUN#1 RUN#2 

# !bs/1\r LOSE+OO 

# 9.92E..01 lbs/hr 

# 7.86£..02 3.97£-01 

# ppm

**6.52E~02** 

# 3.17E+03 

# !bs/hr

**1.45E-~<OO** 

# 4.72E+OO ppm 

# 6.SSE+03 

# 2.13E+04 

# !Wh< 2.971;:.02 

# 2.41E.o.3 ppm 

# 4.79E+02 5.85E+Ol 

# lbs/tlr 2.84E•l0 

# 3A7E·10 

# lb$/hr 3.30E..Q4 

# 3.27E..Q4 

# 100/hr 1.55£..()4 

# 1.54€·04 

# !bs/hr 9.S9E'-o4 2.73E·03 

# lbs/hr 1.65E-OS 1.6-JE-CIS lbsfhr 1.00E.o4 

# 9.96E·IiS 

# lbs/hr 6.1BE-o4 6.58E-o4 

# ll:ts/hr Sl.61E-05 

# S.SOE-05 !!1'$/hr l.OSE--04 

# 2.18E·04 lbs/hr 

# l.QSE-\14 2.18E·0<1 

# lbsfhr 3.17E.Q2 3.53E--02 lbs/hr 8.1(lE-Q4 

# S.!lSE-o4 lbs/hr 3.SSE-Q4 

# 2.1SE·04 lbs/llf 

# 4.12£..04 

# 4.351i·04 lbs/hr 

# S.57f-Q3 

# 4,9;tE-03 lbs/l!r 

# 3.71E-<l4 4.61!E·04 

# lbs/llr l.6$E-o4 1.64E-o4 lbs/hr 

# 1.6SE·C4 1.&1E-I» lb$/hr 

# S.lOE-o<i 

# 1.081;.03 

# lbs/tu 4.32E·02 4.81E-<12 

# BORALBRlCK EPA !CR EMISSION TEST SUMMARY AUGUSTA PLANT 4 POLLUTANT EFFICIENCY CALCULATIONS
IWN" AVERAGE 

# 4.54£·01 8.31f..01 

# 3-.S.Sl:..Ql 

# 2.28£·0:1. HCI

**lb~/hr** 

# 1,2SE-o1 

# lAS.E.01 l.65E.01 1.441':.01 

# :l.O&E+D3: 

# 2.;m+0EJ HC! 

# ppm SI.OSE.+Ol lME-o-03 l.l.9E+03 1.04E+<l3 5.S:2E1-00 

# 3.83£...00 

# HF 

# '"""' 1.S3E..01 2:.!15E..01 3.01E.Ol 2A3i:-Ol 

# 2..31E+04 1.7010+04 

# "' ppm 7.651::+02. S.37&t02 

# l.1SEffi3: 9.52:1:«12 

# 2.2SE-o3 1.l.5E42 

# co lbs/hr 

# 2.14E-03 :0A3E.OS !.>Sli-<>3 :l,,W£-03 

# 3,S2E...Ol 1.S4E+02 

# c" ppm 3.01E+01 3.43Ettll 2.73f+01 3.06E+Ql 

# 6.65E·1l 

# 2.35E-10 OIOXlN/FURAN 

# '"""' 0.00!<+00 5.6.SE·13 1.9SE·12 S.4SE-:13 3.31E.(l4 

# 3".29E..04 

# ANTIMONY (Sb 7440-31$-0) lbs/hr 

# S.l6E...o4 3.22E.c4 3.:!4E-o4 3,2l£..Q4 

# 1.6&::..(15 1.15£-1)4

**ARS~I•liC** 

# {As 744(0.38-2) 

# liu/hr 

# l.SSE...o4 l.lilE-04 

# 1.82E-04 UOE-<>4 

# 2.93E-ro 2.<UE-tl3 SARIUM (Sa

**7440-33.,j,~}** 

# tb$/hr 

# .1.2$E.03 l..lSE-03 

# 3,06!;-03

**:;.,s;u;:~** 

# 1.65E--05 1,65€-0S BERYl.UUM 

# (a<.t 7440-41·7)

**lb~/hr** 

# 1.5&:E·05 

# 1.511:.05 1.62E-05 1.60£-0S 1.01E-04 LOOHM 

# CADMIUM (Cd

**7440-4~9)** 

# lbs/hr 9.62E·OS 

# &-67E..OS 9.85E-0-5 

# 9,ne-os 5.10E·04 5.99E..04 CHROMIUM (Ct7440-47•3} 

# lbs/hr 3.a2E·04 3.89E-!l4 4.sm;.o4 

# 4.10E-tl4 9.64&05 9.60W.05 COMLT (Co 

# 744(}-48-4) 

# '"'"' 3.43E-o4 l.SBE--04 

# 1.4SE-04 U6li·04 

# 1.79E-04 ;!:,0110-D<I 

# COPPER (Cu 7440-SCI-8) IN/!'Ir 2.541':.04 l.Gll;.-()4 

# 3.516-04 

# 2.59E-o4 

# 1.65f2.04 l.BSS-<!4 u;AD (Pb 74SS..SH)

**!b~ht** 

# l,SSE-o.!l 

# 1.61E-o4 

# 1.75E-04 1.fiSE-Q4 1.93E.Q2 

# 2:.88£-1)2 

# MAGNESIUM {Mg 

# 7439-95--4) 

# lbs/nr M$E.Q3 3.9!JE.Q3 

# 5.34E-03 3.$4E-Q3 

# 5.24E·04 

# 7 .l3E-o4 MANGANESE {Mo 7439-96-!i) 

# '"""' H41Hl4 3,12E--O¢ 

# 5..WE..04

. 4.54E.Q4 

# "'

**4.~E-<l4** 

# 3.-(;lE.-{14 

# Men:ury (Hg 

# 14SHN:i) lbs/hr S.54E44 S.Si'E-o4 

# 4.321::-IM 

# 5.08E-o4 

# 0



# ~ 4.41E-04 

# 4.SOE-IM N!Cl{EI. 

# (Ni 7440.02-0) 

# '"""' 3..69&-0<1 

# 2.42E·04 

# 3.7$5..().4 3,i30E-o4 

# 5.73E.03 5A4E..03 

# PHOSPHORUS {P 77.:!3·1-Hl) !bs/llr 

# S.32E..03 4.S9E-Q3 

# 4.51&03 4.9lE..03 

# ,.. 3.31E-04 3.89E-o4 

# SEL€NJUM 

# (Se 71a2.·49·2) 

# !bs/hr 3.15E.o4 3.2:2E-Q4 

# :3.24&-04 3.2lE-.04 

# "' ;o 1.65E---04 

# 1.6SE·04

**SILVE~** 

# (Ag 1440-22-4) 

# lbsfhr 1.58E-04 1.51£-04 

# Hl2E-04 !.6oE-o4 

# 0 1.65E..Q4 1.65E-1» 

# THAlUUM (l1744CI-2B-O) 

# !bi/hr 1.58E..o4 1.61E-o4 

# i.62E-04 1.60E...:l4 

# :>< S.SSE-04 9.28£-04 ZINC {Zrl 

# 744o-56-6-) 

# '"""' l.U.E-D3- G.l$E·04 

# 1.2SE..OS l.OOE-QS (/)


# 3.24&02 4.12E.02POLlUTANTPMHCIHCIHFHFCl2Cl2DIOXIN/FURANANTIMONY(Sb7440-36-0)ARSENIC(As7440-38-2)BARIUM(Sa7440-39-3)BERYLliUM(Be7440-41-7)CADMIUM(Cd7440-43-9)CHROMIUM{Cr7440-47-3)COBALT(Co7440-48-4)COPPER(Cu7440-50-8)LEAD(Pb7439-92-1)MAGNESIUM(Mg7439-95-4)MANGANESE(Mn7439-96-5)Mercury(Hg7439-97-6)NICKEL(Ni7440-02-0)PHOSPHORUS(P7723-14-0)SELENIUM(Se7782-49-2)SILVER(Ag7440-22-4)THALLIUM(TI7440-28-0)ZINC(Zn7440-66-6)TotalMetalsN/A"norontrQIofpollutantdemonstrated.ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142BORALBRICKSBORA!.BRICKEPAICREMISSIONTESTSUMMARYAUGUSTAPlANT4POLLUTANTEFFICIENCYCAlCUlATIONSD!FfBAGHOUSEUNITSRUNURUN#2lbs/hr,%DE24.8665.93lbs/hr,%DEN/A63.98ppm,%DEN/A68.21lbs/hr,%DE86.6995.02ppm,%DE88.3995.61lbs/hr,%DE92.79N/Appm,%DE93.7110.92lbs/hr,%DE100.0099.84lbs/hr,%DE4.241.53lbs/hr,%DE4.241.83lbs/hr,%DEN/A57.88lbs/hr,%DE4.241.83lbs/hr,%DE3.802.91lbs/hr,%DE33.1941.77lbs/hr,%DEN/AN/Albs/hr,%DEN/A26.15lbs/hr,%DE4.2426.15lbs/hr,%DE92.1588.70lbs/hr,%DE36.5460.00lbs/hr,%DEN/AN/Albs/hr,%DE10.4444.50lbs/hr,%DE6.170.41lbs/hr,%DE14.8230.60lbs/hr,%DE4.241.83lbs/hr,%DE4.241.83lbs/hr,%DEN/A42.78lbs/hr,%DE67.6971.11EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5.SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010RUN#3AVERAGEN/A45.3957.4760.7361.4364.8294.3492.0294.8892.9614.0453.4122.4442.3697.0298.952.112.63N/A3.04N/A57.881.822.632.483.0610.0029.98N/AN/AN{A26.15N/A15.1972.3384.39N/A48.277.597.6914.2923.0721.299.292.1115.851.822.631.822.63N/A42.7844.6761.16APPENDIXPAGENo.72BORAL BRICKS PLANTS FIELD DATA CALCULATIONS ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 73

# )> 

# c: 

# ~ "1J



# ~

**~** 

# Q ?r

**~** 

# :< 

# .. "'

Qm 

# c.,

**~)>** )>0 

# CJ)'O;o mt;;m 

# :!jz:S: m-100 

# ;g;CJ)(J) ro,::..O m"'z ;::o

**~Ul** 

# -l 

# "'(J)m S!::r>cn or-!

(ii"lJ 

# ro:o 

# co

**;o~** 

# -<m 

# -o" s;:-1 z -1 

# "'

)> 

# "1J 

# '0 

# m 

# z



# ~



# ~ m 

# z ? 

# g: Method 1 - Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources (Circular Stack) Distance- Far Wall to Outside of Port (in) Distance- Near Wall to Outside of Port (In) Inside Diameter of Stack (in)

Port Diameter- For Ref. Only (in) Distance to Upstream Disturbance (ft) 

# Distance to Downstream Disturbance (ft) Diameters Upstream Diameters Downstream Minimum Distance to Stack Wall (Default is 1.0 inch) 

# 84.50 9.50 Port Length 

# 75.00

4.00 25.00 40.00



# 4.00 

# 6.40 1.00 Traverse Point Number 

# 1 

# 2 3 4 5 

# 6 1 

# 8 9 

# 10 11 

# 12 Conversion Table for Decimal to Inch Fraction 

# 1/16 i/8 3/16 1/4 5/16 0.06 0.13 

# 0. iS 0.25 0.31 PROBE MARKINGS Decimal Inches Number of Traverse Points on a Diameter


# 2 4 6 8 20.45 14.53 12.80 11.90 

# 73.55 

# 28.25 20.45 

# 17.38 65.75 31.70 24.05 

# 79.48 62.30 

# 33.73 73.55 60.28 

# 81.20 69.95 76.63 82.10 10 11.45 

# 15.65 

# 20A5 26.45 35;15 58.85 67.55 73.55 78.35 82.55 

# 3/8 0.38



# 12 11.08 14.53 

# 18.35 22.78 28.25 36.20 57.80 65.75 71.23 75.65 79.48 82.93 to 

# 0 

# $1 r 

# "' ;o 0 

# " CJlATC PROJECT Noo P-10142 PM, HCI, HF, Cl2 EMISSION RATE CAlCUlATION -LOCAnON: BORALBRICK SOURCE: DfFF Baghouse **Outlet~** Plant
5 DATA Run#1 Run #2 Run#J DATE 09117110 09117110 09/17/10 RUN TIME (min) 60.00 60.00 60.00 Dn (in} 0.287 0.287 0.237 An {ft2) 4A9E-04 4.49E-04 4.49E-04 AVG DH(fn-H20}

1.16 1.20
1.21 PATM(InHg)
29.80 29.81 29.79 Pm(inHg) 29.89 29.90 29.88 Ps(GAUGE}

028 0.22 0.22 Ps(IN HG) 29.82 29.83 29,81 Tm(F} 91.54 100.13 106.04 Tm(R) 551.23 559.82 565.73 vm (tt3J 38.47 38.53 37.97 VmSTD(ft3j 35.45 34.97

34.08 Vl.Q (ml) 48.00 37.00 48.00 WSTD{ft3}

2.26 1.74 2.26 V STD (ft3) 37.71 36.72 36.34 '"" 6.00 4.75 6.23 %SVP

1 100.00 100.00 100.00 MD 0.940 0.952 0.938 MWD 29.05 29.05 29.05 M 28.39 28.52 28.36 Ts(F) 352.00 351.04 352.25 Ts(R) 811.69 810.73 811:94 SUMSQRTDP

11.57 11.73 11.73 NDP 24.00 24.00 24.00 AVGSQRTDP

0.48 0.49 0.49 CP 0.84 0.84 0.84 vsifltSJ 33.89 34.26 34.39 Ds (in} 75.00 75.00 75.00 **As(ff~** 30.68 30.68 30.68 QS, FLOW, ACFM 62,386 63,069 63,313 Q sro (ft3/mln} 40,447 40,945 41,015 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM 38,019 39,000 38,461 wr(gm}-PM 0.0000 0.0014 0.0004 WT(gm)-HCL 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 wr(gm)-HF 0.0023 0.0021 0.0021 WT(gm)

• CIZ **1.3SE~05** 1.55E...05 f.61ENQ5 %/ 106.18 102.12 100.91 %C02
1.98
1.92 1.98 %02 18.39 18.50 18,41 %CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 %N2 79.63 79.58 79.61 PM(Ibslhr) 0.000 0.207 0.060 PM(kg/hrj 0.0000 0.0937 0.0271 Production (tph) 14.65 14.65 14.65 Production (Mg) 6.85E...o3 8.65E-03 6.85E-03 PM (kg/Mg of ProduCt} **5.10E-~-oo** 5.16E.,.OO 5.18E+OO PM (mgldscm) 4.00E+04 4.05E+04 4.06E+04 PM (mg/dscm@
7% 02) 2.22E+05 2.34E+05 2.27E+05 HCI (lbS/hr) 4.67E-02 4.18E-02 4.66E-02 HCJ (kg/hr) 2.12E-02 U9E...02 2.11E-02 HCI (kg/Mg of Product) 1.13E+01 1.13E+01 1.13E+01 HCI(ppm) 287.49 250.65 283.57 HCI (ppm @ 7% 02) 1593.61 1451.66 1584.45 HF(Ibslhr) 3.21E-01 3.09E-01 3.17E-01 HF(kg/hr) 1.45E-01 1.40E-01 1.44E-01 HF (kg/Mg ofProduct) 4.62E+OO 4.62E+OO 4.62E+OO HF(ppm) 1083.36 1016.88 1057.97 HF (ppm @ 7% OZ) 6005.29 5889.41 5911.47 Cl2 (lbslhr) 1.96E-03 2.29E-03 2.40E-03 C/2 (kglhr} 8.88E-04 1.04E-03 1.09E-03 C/2 (kg/Mg of Product) 9.39E+03 9.49E+03 9.53E+03 Cl2{ppm) 23.45 26.70 28.46 Cl2 (ppm @ 7% 02) 130.00 154.63 159.02 QS, FLOW, ACMM
1767 1786 1793 QS, FLOW, DSCMM
1077 1104 1089 1 Theoretical amount of moisture that Ts can hofd. ff%M>%SVP, %SVP wlfl be utilized
In calculations. EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5, SAliSBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 AVERAGE 5.66 351.76 811.45 34.18 62,923 40,803 38,493 0.0006 0.0003 0.0022 0.0000 1.96 18.43 0.089 0.0403 14.6500 6.65E-03 5.14E+00 4.04E+04 2.2BE+05 4.50E-02 2.04E-02 1.13E+01 273,90 1543.24 3.15E-01 1.43E-01 4.62E+00 1052.74 5935.39 2.22E-03 1.01E-03 9.47E+03 26.20 147.88 1782 1090 APPENDIX PAGE No. 86BORAL BRICKS 

# ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 

### 09/17/10 ·SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet 

### Run#1



### K= 

### 4.9658 POINT#

Tm



### rs
dp 

## dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1



### 80 355 0.23 1.39 0.529 18.4
2.1 A2



### 81 356 0.26 1.29 0.510 

### A3

82 357 0.26 1.29 0.510 A4



### 83 357 0.28 1.39 0.529 A5



### 84 356 0.26 1.29 0.510 A !I



### 86 356 0.24 1.19 0.490 A7



### 89 355 0.28 1.39 0.529 18.5
2.0 A8



### 90 350 0.25 1.24 0.500 A9



### 90 350 0.22 1.09 0.469 A10



### 91 345 0.21 1.04 0.458 A11



### 92 345 0.20 0.99 0.447 A12



### 93 340 0.18 0.89 0.424 81



### 94 357 0.28 1.39 0.529 18.4
2.1 B2



### 95 

## 357 0.27 1.34 0.520 83



### 96 357 0.26 1.29 0.510 B4



### 96 357 0.25 1.24 0.500 85

96 354 0.24 1.19 0.490 85

97 352 0.23 1.14 0.480 87

97 

## 352 0.23 1.14 

### 0.480 18.6
1.8 88



### 97 351 0.21 1.04 0.458 89



### 97 351 0.20 0.99 0.447 810



### 97 350 0.18 0.89 0.424 811

97 347 0.18 0.89 0.424 812



## 97 341 0.16 0.79 0.400 18.5
1.9 91.54 352.00 0.23 1.16 11.568 18.48 1.98 corrected per 7 e-5b 18.39 Vm(ft3) 

### Initial 

### 29.31

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)
79.63 Final 

### Total ATC PROJECT No. P-10142


### 67.78 38.47 

### %Excess Air EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010



### 699.53 APPENDIX PAGE No. 87

# BORAL BRICKS 

# ISOK!NETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 

# 09/17/10 

# SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet 

# Runl/.2



# K"' 4.9830 POINT#

Tm



# rs
dp 

# dH SQRTOP %02 %C02 A1



# 97 358 

# 0.29 1.45 0.539 

# 18.3
2.2 A2



# 97 356 0.27 1.35 

# 0.520 A3



# 98 356 0.27 1.35 0.520 A4



# 98 356 0.27 1.35 

# 0.520 A5



# 98 354 0,28 1.40 0.529 A6



# 98 354 0.28 1.40 0.529 A7



# 98 354 0.28 1.40 0.529 18.6
1.8 

# A8



# 99 350 0.26 1.30 0.510 A9



# 99 350 0.23 1.15 0.480 A10


# 100 

# 348 0.20 1.00 0.447 

# A11
100 345 0.20 1.00 0.447 

# A12
100 340 0.19 0.95 0.436 

# 81
100 356 0.29 1.45 0.539 18.4
2.1 

# 82
100 356 0.28 1.40 0.529 B3

101 356 0.27 1.35 0.520 B4

101 

# 355 0.25 1.25 0.500 

# 85
102 355 0.25 1.25 0.500 B6


# 102 354 0.23 1.15 0.480 87


# 102 348 0.23 1.15 

# 0.480 18.6
1.7 

# 88
102 347 0.20 1.00 0.447 

# 89
102 

# 347 0.20 1.00 0.447 

# 1310
103 346 

# 0.19 0.95 0.436 811
103 

# 344 0.19 

# 0.95 0.436 B12
103 

# 340 0.17 

# 0.85 0.412 

# 18.6

1.8 100.13 351.04 

# 1),24 1.21) 

# 11.730 18.50 1.92 corrected per 7 e-5b 

# 18.50 Vm(ft3) Initial 

# 67.85

% 

# N2 (BY DIFFERENCE}


# 79.58 Final 

# 106.38 Total 

# 38.53 %Excess 

# Air 737.31 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 

# 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 88BORALBRICKSISOK!NETICDATAANDCALCULATIONSDATE09/17/10SOURCEDIFFBa9houseOutletRun113K=5.0220POINT#TmTsdpdHSQRTDP%02%C02A11023550.271.360.52018.22.3A21023550.291.460.539A31033550.281.410.529A41033550.271.360.520AS1033560.261.310.510A61043540.281.410.529A71043540.271.360.52018.61.9A81053540.261.310.510A91053510.231.160.480A101053510.221.100.469.A111063500.211.050.458A121063450.201.000.447811063570.281.410.52918.52.0821073570.271.360.520831073540.271.360.520841083540.281.410.529851083530.241.210.490861083530.241.210.490871083530.231.160.48018.61.9881083520.201.000.447891093500.201.000.4478101093500.180.900.4248111093450.170.850.4128121103410.170.850.41218.61.8106.04352.250.241.2111.73018.501.98correctedper7e-5b18.41Vm(ft3)Initial106.44%N2(BYDIFFERENCE)79.61FinalTotalATCPROJECTNo.P-10142144.4137.97%ExcessAirEPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010707.05APPENDIXPAGENo.89ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 90ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE CALCULATION The following equation establishes the relationship between the velocity head pressure differential and · the desired critical orifice pressure drop. The constant,

K. is determined

by the following equation. !JJI **=Kx~p** 6Jf = [846. 72 X D:X AH@

X c! (1- Bwj

X **MdTm~**
J X Ap **Ms~Pm** BORALBRICK Module ID Dn dH@ Y, gamma factor Cp Bw(FRACTION,NOT"/o}

Md Pbar PS(GAUG£) Ps Tm,F Tm,R Ms Ts,F Ts

1 R Pm K Terminology 9117/2010 Run#1 Run#2 Run#3 ATC3 ATC3 ATC3 0.287 0.287 0.287 1.937 1.937 1.937 0.963 0.963 0.963 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.03 0.05 0.05 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.80 29.81 29.79 0.28 0.22 0.22 29.32 29.83 29.111 80 100
105 539.69 559.69 564.69 28.67 28.45 28.45 350 350 350 809.69 809.69 809.69 29.91 29.89 29.90 4.9658 4.9830 5.0220 Ms=APPARENT STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT =Md(i-Bw)+18Bw Md=DRY GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT (29) OR =(0.44"%C02)+(0.32"%02)+(0.28*(%N2+%CO)) Ps GAUGE=STACK STATIC PRESSURE (IN. H20) Ps=ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE {IN. Hg) Pm=METER ABSOLUTE PRESSURE (IN. Hg) = Pbar + (avg dH/13.6) 'The method

5 sampling train is intended

to operate
at a sampling rate of 0. 75 cfm of dl)l air at 68 oF and 29.92 in. Hg. The orifice meter pressure differential that would produce such
a sampling rate through the orifice
is designated

as LIH@. The theoretical nozzle calculation

is. optional.

If the tester feels comfortable choosing the nozzle size through other means (experience, prior testing

1 etc.}, this is also acceptable.
Dn (theoretical)

is calculated
on the assumption that a 0. 75 cfm ftowrate
is achieved

at 68 °F and 29.92 in. Hg. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 91ANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS,
INC. Initial **Sourc~** Survey Test Date 09/17/10 Company BORAL BRICK Address City, Stata AUGUSTA, GA Process Tested DIFF Baghouse Inlet Specific Source Plant
5 Air Pollution Controls DIFF Baghouse Inlet Test Methods USEPA
M 29 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 92BORAL BRICKS 

### ANAL YTICAi.. TESTING CONSULTANTS,
INC. Initial Source Survey Test Date 09/17110 Company BORAL BRICK Address 

### City, State AUGUSTA, GA Process Tested DIFF Baghouse Outlet Specific Source Plant
5 Air Pollution Controls DIFF Baghouse Outlet 

### Test Methods USEPA


### M 29 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 103

# ~ 

# a 

# " e5

**~**



# ~ z 0 

# :!:: 

# s:



# ... "' 

# § c:m



# ~~ >fi (/)-o;o 

# mS::m -oz;: 

# -<..;- ll1(/)(/)



# s:.j:>.~ 

# ro,.o

**~Olz**



# - -< "-'(l)m

**~)>en** 

# or-<

(i)-o 

# ro;o 

# co

**,~** 

# -<m



# "~ 

# s;; ":] 

# "'

)> 

# "

**~** 

# z 0 

# x



# ~ m 

# z 5' 

# z Method 1 -Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources (Circular Stack) Distance- Far Wall to Outside of Port (in) Distance- Near Wall to Outside of Port (in) Inside Diameter of Stack (in) 

# 84.50 9.50 Port Length 

# 75.00

Port Diameter- For Ref. Only (in) 4.00 Distance to Upstream Disturbance 

# (ft) Distance to Downstream Disturbance (ft) Diameters Upstream Diameters Downstream Minimum Distance to Stack Wall (Default is 1.0 inch) 

# 25.00 40.00

4.00 6.40 1.00 Traverse Point Number 

# 1 2 

# 3 4 

# 5 6 

# 7 8 

# 9 10 11 12 Conversion Table for Decimal to Inch Fraction 

# 1116 118 3116 114 5116 0.06 

# 0.13 0.19 0.25 

# 0.31 PROBE MARKINGS Decimal Inches Number of Traverse Points on a Diameter



# 2 4 6 

# 8 20.45 14.53 12.80 

# 11.90 73.55 28.25 20.45 

# 17.38 65.75 31.70 24.05 79.48 62.30 

# 33.73 73.55 60.28 

# 81.20 69.95 76.63 82.10 

# 10 11.45 15.65 20.45 26.45 35.15 58.85 67.55 73.55 78.35 

# 82.55 3/8 0.38



# 12 11.08 

# 14.53 18.35 22.78 28.25 36.20 57.80 65.75 71.23 75.65 79.48 82.93 OJ 

# 0



# ~ ,- 

# "' 

# "' fi 

# "' enBORALBRICKSMETALEMISSIONRATECALCULATIONSLOCATION;BORALBRICKSOURCE:DIFFBaghouseOutletDATARun#1Run#2Run#3AVERAGEDATE09/17/1009/17/1009117110RUNTIME(min)60.0060.0060.00Dn(In)0.2870.2870.287An(ft2)4.49E-044.49E-044.49E-04AVGDH(inH20)1.221.201.17PATM(InHg}29.7529.7229.72Pm(lnHg}29.8429.81 29.81Ps(GAUGE)0.280.220.22Ps(INHG)29.7729.7429.74Tm(F)104.7999.4289,71Tm(R}564.48559.11549.40Vm(ft3)38.1837.3135.88VmSTD(ft3}34.3033.8033.08VLQ(ml)40.5040.5048.00WSTD(ft3}1.911.912.26VSTD(ft3)36.2135.7135.35%M5.27 5.356.405.67%SVP1100.00100.00100.00MD0.9470.9470.936MWD29.0529.0529.05M28.4728.4628.35Ts(F)355.71353.25 356.46355.14Ts(R)815.40812.94816.15814.83SUMSQRTDP11.8011.7811.73NDP24.0024.0024.00AVGSQRTDP0.490.490.49CP0.840.840.84Vs(ftls)34.6434.5534.5534.56Ds(in}75.0075.0075.00As(ft2)30.6830.6830.68QS,FLOW,ACFM63,77263,59563,59263,653QSTD(ft3/mln)41,08841,05040,88741,00$QSTDDRY,FLOWSCFM38,922 38,85638,26938,682WT(gm)0.00210.62310.06260.2293%1100.3799.0898.45%C021.981.921.981.96%0218.3918.5018.4118.43%CO0.000.000.00%N279.6379.5879.611TheoreticalamountofmoisturethatTscanhold.If%M>%SVP,%SVPwillbeutilizedincalculations.jv.LuqD·91.:::2>ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.105BORAL BRICKS 

# ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 

### 09117110 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet 

### Run#1



### K= 

### 5.0223 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 

### A1


### 100 366 0.25 1.26 0.500 19.5
1.2 

## A2

101 360 0.26 1.31 0.510 A3


### 102 360 0.28 1.41 0.529 

## A4
104 360 0.28 1.41 0.529 

## A5
104 360 0.27 1.36 0.520 

### A6
104 361 0.28 1.41 0.529 

## A7
104 361 0.25 1.26 0.500 

## A8
105 361 0.24 1.21 0.490 

### A9
105 360 0.24 1.21 0.490 A10


### 105 355 0.20 1.00 0.447 A11


### 105 354 0.19 0.95 0.436 A12


### 105 

## 353 0.19 0.95 0.436 81


### 105 362 0.24 1.21 0.490 82


### 106 360 0.26 1.31 0.510 

### 83
106 359 0.28 1.41 0.529 84


### 106 357 0.30 1.51 0.548 

### 85
106 357 0.30 1.51 0.548 86


### 106 357 0.26 1.31 0.510 

## 87
106 348 0.26 1.31 0.510 

## 88
106 347 0.24 1.21 0.490 

## 89
106 347 0.20 1.00 0.447 811)


### 106 344 0.20 1.00 0.447 811


### 106 344 0.18 0.90 0.424 812


### 106 344 0.19 0.95 0.436 104.79 

### 355.71 ().24 1.22 

## 11.804 19.50 

### 1.20 corrected per 

### 7e-5b 19.51) Vm(ft3) 

### Initial 

### 145.04

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)


### 79.30 Final 

### 183.22 Total 

### 38.18 %Excess Air 

### 1358.70 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 106BORALBRICKSISOKINET!CDATAANDCALCULATIONSDATE09/17/10SOURCEDIFFBaghouseOutletRun#2K=4.9755POINT#TmTsdpdHSQRTDP%02%C02A11033600.241.190.49019.41.3A21033640.271.340.520A31033640.271.340.520A41033600.281.390.529A51023590.271.340.520A61023550.251.240.500A?1013510.251.240.500AB1013480.251.240.500A91013490.241.190.490A101003470.201.000.447A111003450.201.000.447A12993430.190.950.43681993650.251.240.50082993620.251.240.500B3983610.281.390.529B4983590.291.440.539Bfi973590.301.490.548Bll973580.261.290.510B7973520.261.290.510BB973450.211.040.458B9973450.211.040.458810973450.211.040.458B11963420.190.950.436B12963400.190.950.43699.42353.250.241.2011.78019.401.30correctedper7e-5b19.4()Vm(ft3)Initial183.41%N2(BYDIFFERENCE)79.31)Final220.72Total37.31%ExcessAir1263.88ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5.SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.107

## BORAL BRICKS 

# ISOK!NETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 

# 09/17/10 

# SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet 

# Run#3

K= 

# 4.8917 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp dH 

# SQRTDP 

# %02 

# %C02 A1



# 92 360 0.26 1.27 0.510
19.1
1.5 A2

92 

# 360 0.28 1.37 0.529 

# A3

92 360 0.28 1.37 0.529 

# A4

92 360 

# 0.26 1.27 0.510 

# A5

91 359 0.26 1.27 0.510 

# A6

91 358 0.27 1.32 0.520 

# A7



# 90 358 0.27 1.32 

# 0.520 A8



# 90 355 0.24 1.17 0.490 

# A9

90 

# 353 0.22 1.08 0.469 

# MO

90 347 0.19 0.93 0.436 

# A11

90 345 0.20 0.98 0.447 A12



# 90 344 0.19 0.93 0.436 81



# 90 362 0.26 1.27 0.510 82



# 90 364 0.26 1.27 0.510 

# 83

90 364 0.26 1.27 0.510 

# 84

90 364 0.25 1.22 0.500 

# 85

89 363 0.27 1.32 0.520 86



# 89 362 0.27 1.32 0.520 

# 87

88 361 0.24 1.17 

# 0.490 88



# 88 358 0.20 0.98 0.447 

# 89

88 358 

# 0.20 0.98 0.447 810



# 87 348 0.21 1.03 0.458 811



# 87 346 0.21 1.03 0.458 812



# 87 346 

# 0.21 1.03 0.458 

# 89.71 356.46 0.24 1.17 11.733 19.10 

# 1.50 corrected per 7 e-5b 19.10 

# Vm{ft3) Initial 

# 220.83

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)


# 79.40 Final 

# 256.71 Total 

# 35.88 %Excess 

# Air 

# 1026.00 ATC PROJECT No. P·10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 

## 5. SALISBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 108Run#1BEGINNINGENDINGNETRun#2BEGINNINGENDINGNETRun#3BEGINNINGENDINGNETATCPROJECTNo.P-10142BORALBRICKSMOISTUREDATAPlant59117/20101stImp.2ndImp.3rd/4tllImp.100100200no10020030001stImp.2ndImp.3rdl41hImp.10010020013010020030001stImp.2ndImp.3rd/4thImp.10010020012811220028120EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPlANTS4 &5,SALISBURYPlANT6SEPTEMBER20105thImp.TOTALS300.0310.510.540.55thImp.TOTALS300.0310.510.540.55thImp.TOTALS300.0308.08.048.0APPENDIXPAGENo.109BORALBRICKSISOKINETICSAMPLINGRATECALCULATIONThefollowingequationestablishestherelationshipbetweenthevelocityheadpressuredifferentialandthedesiredcriticalorificepressuredrop.Theconstant,K,Isdeterminedbythefollowingequation.!'i'H=[846.72Xx!'i'H@Xc!(1-Bws)2xMdTmP.:Jx!lpMsT..PmModu/eiDDndH@Y,gammafactorCpBw(FRACTION,NOT%)MdPbarPS(GAUGE)PsTm,FTm,RMsTs,FTs,RPmKBORALBRICK9/17/2010Run#1Run#2Run#3ATC3ATC3ATC30.2870.2870.2871.9371.9371.9370.9630.9630.9630.840.840.840.050.050.0529.029.029.029.7529.7229.720.280.220.2229.7729.7429.7410510090564.69559.69549.6928.4528.4528.45350350350809.69809.69809.6929.8629.8429.815.02234.97554.8917TerminologyMs=APPARENTSTACKGASMOLECULARWEIGHT=Md(1-Bw)+18BwMd=DRYGASMOLECULARWEIGHT(29)OR=(0.44'%C02)+(0.32'%02)+(0.28'(%N2+%CO))PsGAUGE=STACKSTATICPRESSURE(IN.H20)Ps=ABSOLUTESTACKPRESSURE(IN.Hg)Pm=METERABSOLUTEPRESSURE(IN.Hg)=Pbar+(avgdH/13.6)1Themethod5samplingtrainisintendedtooperateatasamplingrateof0.75cfmofdryairat68oFand29.92in.Hg.TheorificemeterpressuredifferentialthatwouldproducesuchasamplingratethrouqhtheorificeIsdesionatedas1\H,_Thetheoreticalnozzlecalculationisoptional.Ifthetesterfeelscomfortablechoosingthenozzlesizethroughothermeans(experience,priortesting,etc.),thisisalsoacceptable.Dn(theoretical)iscalculatedontheassumptionthata0.75cfmflowrateisachievedat68°Fand29.92in.HoATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.110BORAL BRICKS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS BORALBRICK AUGUSTA,
GA Run#1 1) ABSOLUTE PRESSURE

IN DRY GAS METER Pm = P ATM + AVG DH/13.6 PATM Avg. DH 29.75 1.22 2) ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE Ps = P ATM
+ Ps(GAUGE)/13.6 PATM Ps(GAUGE) 29.75 0.28

Pm 29.84 Ps 29.77 3) SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS VM STO = (VM)"(Y)"(T STDffM)"(PMIP STD) Vm
Tm

y VmSTD 38.18 564.48 0.963 34.30 TSTD= PSTD= ft3 4} VOLUME OF WATER COLLECTED, CORRECTED
TO STANDARD CONDITIONS W STD::: W STOw+ WSTDsg W STDw

• (.002673)'(VLOwt(T STDIP STD) W STDsg

= (.002668)"\/LQsg)'(T STOlP STD) WHERE 0.002673

• 0.04707 FT31ML 'IN. HG/17.64 DEG. R. WHERE 0.002668

= 0.04715 FT3/G'IN.HGI17.64 DEG. R. VLQ (w) 30.00 VLQ (sg) 10.50 WSTD 1.91
ft3 5) TOTAL SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS V STD=Vm STD +W STD =
36.21 ft3 6) PERCENT MOISTURE

IN STACK GAS %M = (100)"(W STO)N STD = 5.27% 7) MOLE FRACTION OF DRY GAS MD= (100--%M)/100"'

0.947

528 DEG R. 29.92 IN. HG ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 111

# SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

# (continued) BORALBRICK AUGUSTA, GA 

# Run#1 B) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE DRY GAS MWD

= **(%C02"0.44)+{02~0.32)+{{%CO+%N2Y0.28j** 

# %C02 %02 

# %CO 

# 1.2 19.5

0.0 9) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE WET GAS 

# M = (MWD)"(MD)



# + 18(1-MD)



# =


# %N2 79.6 WHERE 18 =MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF WATER, GIG-MOLE 10) 

# STACK VELOCITY VS = (85.49)"(CP)"((TSI(PS)(M))A1f2'({SUM

SORT DP)IN DP)) 

# where 

# 85.49 

# = **ftlsec~** 

# (lbllb--mole"in.Hg}/{deg.

R"in H20)]"0.5 CP 0.84 Ts(R) 815.40 SUM SORT 11.80 

# 11) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE OS = (60)*(VS)*(AS) AS (Inlet) 30.68

NDP 

# 24 QS 

# 63,759 MWD 

# 29.06 28.48


# vs 34.64 12) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, STANDARD CONDITIONS INCLUDING MOISTURE Q 

# STD 

# = Q 

# STD DRY/MD

41,080 

# !3) STACK VOLUME FLOW RATE STANDARD CONDITIONS DRY 0 STD DRY= 17.647'60'Md"Vs'A'(Ps1Ts(R))

= 38,914 14) POLLUTANT MASS RATE, CONCENTRATION BASIS PMRC



# = (. 1323)'(WT)'(Q STD)N STD WHERE 0.1323 =COMBINED CONVERSION FACTOR (60 MIN/HR•o.00220 LBSIGRAM) WT(GRAMS) 0.0021 15) PERCENT ISOKINET!C

PMRC 0.315 %1 • (0.09450'Ts'llm std)I(Ps"\\s'An'Time•Mct) Run Time Area of Nozzle



# %1 100.39 60 4.49E-04 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 

# & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 112ATC PROJECT No. P·10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENOIX PAGE No. 113.Metal Antimony (Sb 7 440-36-Q) Arsenic {As 7440-38-2) Barium lBa 7440-39-3) Beryllium {Be 7440-41-7) Cadmium (Cd 7 440-43--9) Chromium (Cr 7440--47-3} Cobalt (Co 7440-48-4) Copper (Cu 7440-50-8) Magnesium (Mg 7 439-95-4 Manganese (Mn 7 439-96-5) Mercury (Hg 7 439-97 -6) Nickel (Ni 7 440-02-0) Phosphorus

(P 7723-14-0) Selenium {Se 7782-49-2) Silver (Ag 7 440-22-4) Thallium (TI 7 440-28-0) Zinc (Zn 7 440-66-6) ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

•· .. Multiple Metals Emission Rate Summary Client: Bora! Bricks Location: Augusta, GA Date: 9/17/2010 Source: Plan!
5 Outlet Lbs/hr kg/hr 3.86E-04 1.75E-04 1.93E-04 8.76E-05 1.42E-03 6.43E-04 1.93E-05 8.76E-06 1.17E-04 5.30E-05 3.91E-04 1.77E-04 1. i3E-04 5.11E-05 3.32E-04 1.51E-04 1.81 E-03 8.21E-04 1.35E-03 6.10E-04 1.03E-03 4.67E-04. 2.90E-04 1.32E-04 5.08E-03 2.30E-03 3.97E-04 1.80E-04 1.93E-04 8.76E-05 1.93E-04 8.76E-05 1.42E-03 6.42E-04 kgJMg of Product 3.61E-07 1.81E-07 1.32E-06 1.81E-08 1.09E-07 3.66E-07 1.05E-07 3.11E-07 1.72E-06 1.26E-06 9.63E-07 2.71E-07 4.75E-06 3.71E-07 1.81E-07 1.81E-07 1.32E-06 EPA !CR. EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 mg/dscm mg/dscm

@ 7% 02 2.51E-03 1.35E-02 1.26E-03 6.74E-03 9.23E-03 4.95E-02 1.26E-04 6.74E-04 7.61E-04 4.08E-03 2.55E-03 1.37E-02 7.33E-04 3.93E-03 2.16E-03 1.16E-02 1.18E-02 6.31E-02 8.75E-03 4.69E-02 6.70E-03 3.59E-02 1.89E-03 1.01E-02 3.31E-02 1.77E-01 2.58E-03 1.39E-02 1.26E-03 6.74E-03 1.26E-03 6.74E-03 9.21E-03 4.94E-02 APPENDIX PAGE No. 114BORALBRICKSANALYT/CAI..TESTINGCONSULTANTS,INC.InitialSourceSwvey·TestDate09118/10CompanyBORALBRICKAddressCity,StateAUGUSTA,GAProcessTestedDIFFBaghouseOutletSpecificSourcePlant5AirPollutionControlsDIFFBaghouseOutletTestMethodsUSEPAM23ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.126

# 1: 

# ~ " 

# 2 m



# ~ 

# z ? 

# 2: :1



# .... 

# "'


# "'m c.,

**~,** 

# »o 

# "'""' m);rn 

# -uzs: 

# -<...,-

**men~** 

# s: .. -

**~Qo~** ;o 

# 91 -I 

# "'"'m

**~F:~** 

# o_.,

gj, 

# co

**,~** 

# -<m 

# .,o 

# s;-<

**~** 

# "'



# , :g m 

# z 0 

# 5<



# ~ m 

# z ? 

# "' ..., Method 1 ·Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources (Circular Stack) Distance. Far Wall to Outside of Port (in) Distance· Near Wall to Outside of Port (in) Inside Diameter of Stack (in) 84.50 9.50 Port Length 75.00

Port Diameter. For Ref. Only (in) 4.00 Distance to Upstream Disturbance (ft) 

# Distance to Downstream Disturbance (ft) 

# Diameters Upstream Diameters Downstream Minimum Distance to Stack Wall (Default is 1.0 inch) 

# 25.00 40.00

4.00 6.40 1.00 Traverse Point Number 

# 1 2 

# 3 4 5 

# 6 

# 7 8 9 

# 10 11 

# 12 Conversion Table for Decimal to Inch Fraction 

# 1/16 1/8 3/16 1/4 5/16 0.06 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 PROBE MARKINGS 

# Decimal Inches Number of 

# Traverse Points on a 

# Diameter

:1. 

# 4 6 

# 8 20.45 

# 14.53 12.80 

# 11.90 73.55 28.25 20.45 17.38 65.75 31.70 24.05 

# 79.48 62.30 33.73 73.55 60.28 81.20 

# 69.95 76.63 82.10 

# 10 11:45 15.65 20.45 26.45 35.15 58.85 67.55 73.55 78.35 

# 82.55 3/8 

# 0.38



# 12 11.08 14.53 18.35 22.78 28.25 36.20 57.80 

# 65.75 71.23 

# 75.65 79.48 

# 82.93 

# "' 0 

# 52 r- (D 

# ;o 

# 1'5 

# @DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS LOCATION: BORAL BRICK SOURCE: DIFF Baghouse .Outlet· Piant
5 DATA Run 111 Run#2 Run fi.J A VERA GE DATE 09/18110 09118110 09118110 RUN TIME (min) 240.00 240.00 240.00 Dn (in) 0.287 0.287 0.287 An (f/2) 4.49E.Q4 4.49E-04 4.49E-04 AVG DH (in H20)
1.19 1.25 1.25 PATM(inHg)
29.75 29.82 29.75 Pm(lnHg) 29.84 29.91 29.84 Ps (GAUGE)
0.22 0.22 0.22 Ps(IN HG) 29.77 29.84 29.77 Tm(F) 78.21 97.96 93.08 Tm(R} 537.90 557.65 552.77 Vm (ft3} 146.22 152.03 152.66 Vm STD(fiJ} 137.83 138.58 140.05 VI.Q (ml) 140.50 140.50 140.50 WSTD(f/3)

6.63 6.63 6.63 V STD (ft3} 144.46 145.20 146.68 %M 4.59 4.56

4.52 4.56 %SVP

1 100.00 100.00 100.00 MD 0.954 0.954 0.955 MWD 29.06 29.10 29.09 M 28.56 28.59 28.59 Ts(F) 360.98 359.27 360.25 360.17 Ts(R) 820.67 818.96 819.94 819.86 SUMSQRTDP
23.90 24.07 24.35 NDP 48.00 48.00 48.00 AVGSQRTDP

0.50 0.50
0.51 CP 0.84 0.84 0.84 Vs (ftfs) 35.13 35.27 35.77 35.39 Ds (in) 75.00 75.00 75.00 As (f/2) 30.68 30.68 30.68 QS, FLOW, ACFJ!I 64,668 64,933 65,839 65,147 Q STD (f/3/min) 41,392 41,746 42,179 41,772 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM 39,493 39,841 40,274 39,869 WT(gm) 1.21E-10 6.34E-11 4.50E-11 7.65E-11 %1 99.37 99.03 99.01 %C02
2.03 2.03 2.03 2.03 %02 18.50 19.40 19.10 19.00 %CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 %N2 79.48 78.58 78.88 D!F (lbslhr) 4.59E-09 2.41E-09
1.71 E-09 2.90E-09 DIF{kg!hr) 2.08E-09 1.09E.Q9 7.77E-10 1.32E-09 Production (tph) 14.65 14.65 14.65 1.47E+01 Production (J!Ig) 6.65E-03 6.65E-03 6.65E-03 6.65E-03 D!F (kg!Mg of Product) 1.82E-11 9.541E-12 6.772E-12 1.15E-11 D!F (ngldscm) 3.100E-02 1.615E-02 1.135E-02 1.95E-02 D!F (ngldscm@
7% 02) 1.80E-01 1.50E-01 8.76E-02 1.39E-01 QS, FLOW, ACMM
1831 1839 1864 1845 QS, FLOW, DSCMM 1118 1128

1140 1129 Theoretical amount of moisture that Ts can hold. If %M>%SVPv %SVP will be utilized
in calculations

. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT

. APPENDIX PAGE No. 128 AUGUST
A PlANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

# BORAL BRICKS 

# ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATe 

# 09118/10 SOURCE! 

# DIFF **Baghous~** 

# Outlet Run #2



# K= 

# 4.9317 POINT#



# Tm

Ts


# clp 

# ciH SQRTDP 

# %02 %C02 

# A1



# 91 355 0.25 1.23 0.500
18.4
2.1 A1



# 91 355 0.25 1.23 0.500 A2



# 91 355 0.25 1.23 0.500 A2



# 92 360 0.25 1.23 0.500 

# A3

93 360 0.28 1.38 0.529 A3



# 94 364 0.28 1.38 0.529 A4



# 94 364 0.31 1.53 0.557 

# A4

94 364 0.31 1.53 0.557 AS



# 95 364 

# 0.31 1.53 0.557 AS



# 95 364 

# 0.31 1.53 0.557 

# A6

95 364 0.24 1.18 0.490 A6



# 95 363 0.24 

# 1.18 0.490 

# A7

00 363 0.24 1.18 0.490
18.5
2.0 A7



# 96 363 0.24 

# 1.18 0.490 A8



# 96 364 0.26 1.28 0.510 

# A8

97 364 0.26 1.28 0.510 A9



# 97 364 0.28 1.38 0.529 

# A9

97 362 0.28 1.38 0.529 A10



# 97 362 0.28 1.38 0.529 A10

97 362 0.28 1.38 0.529 A11



# 97 362 0.21 1.04 0.458 A11



# 97 362 0.21 1.04 0.458 

# A12

97 362 0.21 1.04 0.458 A12



# 97 360 0.21 1.04 0.458 81



# 98 368 0.24 1.18 0.490
18.4
2.1 

# 81



# 98 368 0.24 1.18 0.490 82



# 97 363 0.29 1.43 0.539 B2



# 97 361 0.29 1.43 0.539 83

98 

# 359 0.30 1.48 0.548 

# 83
100 358 0.30 1.48 0.548 84


# 100 358 0.31 

# 1.53 0.557 84


# 100 358 0.31 1.53 0.557 

# 85
100 358 0.25 1.23 0.500 85



# 101 358 0.25 1.23 0.500 B6



# 101 355 0.22 1.08 0.469 

# 86

101 355 0.22 1.08 0.469 

# 87
102 355 0.24 1.18 0.490
18.6
1.9 87


# 102 354 0.24 1.18 0.490 

# 88
102 354 0.24 1.18 0.490



# zl 88
102 354 0.24 1.18 0.490

/] 

# \: 89


# 102 356 0.22 1.08 0.469 

# "'-'.
Q• 89


# 102 356 0.22 1.08 0.469



# ' C\ " 810


# 103 354 0.22 1.08 0.469 

# ?60

l 

# ~ 810
103 

# 353 0.22 1.08 0.469



# - L '-> B11


# 103 353 0.21 1.04 0.458



# u

l 

# \q_ 811
103 353 0.21 1.04 0.458



# ' 

# . 

# {X

812
103 352 0.20 0.99 0.447



# '7 

# 7_, 812


# 103 350 0.20 0.99 0.447



# \c.\ lp

c 

# 0)5)

97.96 359.27 0.25 

# 1.25 24.065 18.48 2.03 

# rx

corrected per 7e .. 5b 

# 19.40 Vm(ft3) 

# Initial 403.63

% 

# N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)


# 78.58 f' 

# .l,
\

Final 

# 555.65 

# \~/

**~ ~** 

Total



# 152.03 %Excess 

# Air 1443.67 

# ~\j 

# tl

.. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT APPENDIX PAGE No. 129 AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 

# 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010BORAl BRICKS ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09/18/10 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet Run#3

K= 4.8203 POINT#

rm

Ts
dp dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1

94 364 0.27 1.30 0.520 18.4

2.1 A1

94 364 0.27 1.30 0.520 A2

94 364 0.27 1.30 0.520 A2

94 364 0.27 1.30 0.520 A3

93 364 0.27 1.30 0.520 A3

93 360 0.27 1.30 0.520 A4

93 360 0.32 1.54 0.566 A4

93 359 0.32 1.54 0.566 A5

93 359 0.33 1.59 0.574 A5

93 359 0.33 1.59 0.574 AG

93 359 0.30 1.45 0.548 A6

93 359 0.30 1.45 0.548 A7

93 359 0.26 1.25 0.510
18.5
2.0 A7

93 358 0.26 1.25 0.510 A8

94 350 0.26 1.25 0.510 A8

94 351 0.26 1.25 0.510 A9

94 351 0.27 1.30 0.520 A9

94 361 0.27 1.30 0.520 A10

95 359 0.24 1.16 0.490 A10

95 359 0.24 1.16 0.490 A11

95 358 0.22 1.06 0.469 A11

95 358 0.22 1.06 0.469 A12

95 358 0.22 1.06 0.469 A12

95 358 0.22 1.06 0.469 81

95 367 0.25 1.21 0.500 18.4
2.1 81

95 367 0.25 1.21 0.500 82

95 365 0.28 1.35 0.529 82

95 385 0.28 1.35 0.529 83

94 384 0.30 1.45 0.548 83

94 354 0.30 1.45 0.548 84

94 364 0.32 1.54 0.566 84

93 364 0.32 1.54 0.566 85

93 363 0.28 1.35 0.529 85

93 363 0.28 1.35 0.529 86

93 363 0.24 1.16 0.490 86

92 363 0.24 1.16 0.490 87

92 359 0.21 1.01 0.458
18.6
1.9 87

92 359 0.21 1.01 0.458 88

92 359 0.23 1.11 0.480 88

91 359 0.23 1.11 0.480 89

91 357 0.23 1.11 0.480 89

91 356 0.23 1.11 0.480 810

91 355 0.24 1.1B 0.490 811)

90 355 0.24 1.16 0.490 811

90 354 0.20 0.96 0.447 811

90 354 0.20 0.96 0.447 812

90 354 0.20 0.96 0.447 812

90 354 0.20 0.96 0.447 93.08 360.25 1).26 1.25 24.355 18.48 2.03 corrected per 7e·5b 19.10 Vm(ft3) Initial 556.03

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)
78.88 Final 708.89 Total 152.66 %Excess Air 1108.53 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 130BORAL BRICKS MOISTURE DATA Plant
5 9/18/2010 Run #1 1stlmp. 2nd Imp. BEGINNING

100
100 ENDING

213
114 NET
113

14 Run#2

1st Imp. 2nd Imp. BEGINNING

100 100 ENDING

213
114 NET
113

14 Run#3

1st Imp. 2nd Imp. BEGINNING

100
100 ENDING

213
114 NET
113

14 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

3rd Imp. 4th Imp. TOTALS 0 300.0 0 313.5 0 13.5 140.5 3rd Imp. 4th Imp. TOTALS 0 300.0 0 313.5 0 13.5 140.5 3rd Imp. 4th Imp. TOTALS 0 300.0 0 313.5 0 13.5 140.5 APPENDIX PAGE No. 131BORAL BRICKS ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE CALCULATION The following equation establishes the relationship between the velocity head pressure differential and the desired critical orifice pressure drop. ](.X /1p The constant,

K, is determined
by flH
= [846. 72 X **D~** X MJ@

X c! (1- Bws

) 2 x MdTmP,. ]x f.l.p **MsT.s~,** ModuleiD Dn dH@ Y, gamma factor Cp Bw(FRACTION,NOT%)

Md Pbar PS (GAUGE') Ps Tm,F Tm,R Ms Ts,F Ts,R Pm K Terminology BORALBRJCK 9/1812010 Run#t ATC3 0.287 1.937 0.963 0.84 0.05 29.0 29.75 0.22 29.77 85 544.69 28.45 360 819.69 29.86 4.7846 Run #2 Run#3 ATC
3 ATC3 0.287 0.287 1.937 1.937 0.963 0.963 0.84 0.84 0.05 0.05 29.0 29.0 29.82 29.75 0.22 0.22 29.84 29.77 100

90 559.69 549.69 28.45 28.45 360 360 819.69 819.69 29.84 29.91 4.9317 4.8203 Ms=APPARENT STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT =Md(1-Bw)+18Bw Md=DRY GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT (29) OR =(0.44*%C02)+(0.32*%02)+(0.28*(%N2+%CO)) Ps GAUGE=STACK STATIC PRESSURE (IN. H20) Ps=ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE (IN. Hg) Pm=METER ABSOLUTE PRESSURE (IN. Hg) = Pbar
+ (avg dH/13.6) 1 The method

5 sampling train is intended
to operate
at a sampling rate of 0.75 cfm of dry air at 68 oF and 29.92 in. Hg. The orifice meter pressure differential t11at would produce such
a sampling rate through the orifice
is designated

as iiH@. The theoretical nozzle calculation

is optional.

If the tester feels comfortable choosing the nozzle size through other means (experience, prior testing, etc.), this is also acceptable.
Dn (theoretical)

is calculated
on the assumption that a 0.75 cfm flowrate

is achieved
at 68 °F and 29.92 in. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

Hg. EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 132BORALBRICKSSAMPLECALCULATIONSBORALBRICKAUGUSTA,GARun#11)ABSOLUTEPRESSURElNDRYGASMETERPm•PATM+AVGDH/13.6PATMAvg.DH29.751.192)ABSOLUTESTACKPRESSUREPs•PATM•Ps(GAUGE)/13.6PATMPs(GAUGE)29.750.22Pm29.84Ps29.773)SAMPLEVOLUMEATSTANDARDCONDITIONSVMSTD•(VM)"(Y)'(TSTDITM)'(PM/PSTD)VmTmyVmSTDTSTD•PSTD•146.22537.900.963137.83ft34)VOLUMEOFWATERCOLLECTED,CORRECTEDTOSTANDARDCONDITIONSWSTD=WSTOw+WSTDsgWSTOw=(.002673)'(VLQw)"(TSTD/PSTD)WSTDsg=(.002668)'VLQsg)'(TSTOlPSTD)WHERE0.002673•0.04707FT3/ML'IN.HG/17,64DEG.R.WHERE0.002668=0.04715FT3/G'IN.HG/17.64DEG.R.VLQ(W)127.00VLQ(sg)13.50WSTD6.63ft35)TOTALSAMPLEVOLUMEATSTANDARDCONDITIONSVSTD=VmSTD+WSTD=144.46ft36}PERCENTMOISTUREINSTACKGAS%M=(100)'(WSTD)NSTD=4.59%7}MOLEFRACTIONOFDRYGASMD={100-%M)/160=0.954528DEGR.29.921N.HGATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4 &5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.133BORAL BRICKS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS (qontinued) BORAL BRICK AUGUSTA,
GA Run#1 8) MOLECUlAR WEIGHT OF THE DRY GAS MWD

• (%C02'0.44)+(02"0.32)+((%CO+%N2)'0.28) %C02 %02 2.0 18.5

0.0 9) MOLECUlAR WEIGHT OF THE WET GAS M • (MWD)'(MD)

+ 18(1-MO)

=
%N2 79.5 WHERE 18 = MOLECUlAR WEIGHT OF WATER. GIG-MOLE !OJ STACK VELOCITY VS = (85.49)'(CP)'({TS!(PS)(M))'112"((SUM

SORT DP)/N DP)) where 85.49
= ftfsec

.. pbilb--mole"'!n.Hg)J(deg.

Win H20)1

11 0.5 CP 0.84 Ts(R) 820.67 SUMSQRT 23.90 11) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE QS = (60)"(VS)'(AS) AS (inlet) 30.68

NDP 48 QS 84,888 MWD 29.06 28.56
vs 35.13 12) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, STANDARD CONDITIONS INCLUDING MOISTURE Q STD = Q STD DRY/MD

41,392 13) STACK VOLUME FLOW RATE STANDARD CONDITIONS DRY Q STD DRY= 17.647'60'Md"Vs"A"(Ps!Ts(R))

= 39,493 14) POLLUTANT MASS RATE, CONCENTRATION BASIS PMRC

• (. 1323)'(Wl]'(Q STD)N STD WHERE 0.1323

• COMBINED CONVERSION FACTOR (60 MINIHR"0.00220 LBS/GRAM) WT(GRAMS) 0.0000 15) PERCENT ISO KINETIC
PMRC 0.000 "lol = **(0.09450~Ts*Vm** **std)/(Ps"Vs"An~Tlme~Md}** Run Tlme Area of Nozzle

%! 240 4.49E-04 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

99.37 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 134BORAL BRICKS ANAL YTlCAL TESTING CONSULTANTS,
INC. Initial Source Survey Test Data 09/18/iO Company BORAL BRICK Address City, State Plant
5 Process Tested Dryer Specific Source Dryer Air Pollution Controls Test Methods US EPA M 23 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 135

# ~ " 

# " 2 m



# ~ 

# z ? 

# :!:

**~** 

# t, 

# 8 c:m m" -;> J>() {1)-u;o 

# m>m "UZS: 

# -<-;- mm{/) s:,.!:>.f:Q



# ~Jtoo 

# "'"'z

- -; 

# "'"''"

**~>"'** 

# or-<

(ii.v 

# "'" c:o

**,~** 

# -:rn .,n :;;-<

**~** 

# "'



# ~ rn z 0 

# x



# ~ m 

# fi

**~** 

# Method 1 -Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources (Circular Stack) Distance- Far Wall to Outside of Port (in) Distance- Near Wall to Outside of Port (in) Inside Diameter of Stack (in) 

# 52.00 0.00 Port Length 

# 52.00

Port Diameter- For 

# Ret Only (in) 

# 4.00 Distance 

# to Upstream Disturbance (ft) 

# Distance to Downstream Disturbance 

# (It) Diameters Upstream Diameters Downstream Minimum Distance to 

# Stack Wall (Default is 

# 1.0 inch) 

# 10.00 4.00 2.31 0.92 1.00 Traverse Point Number 

# 1 2 

# 3 

# 4 

# 5 6 7 8 

# 9 10 11 12 Conversion Table for Decimal to Inch Fraction 

# 1116 1/8 3116 114 5116 0.06 0.13 0.19 

# 0.25 0.31 PROBE MARKINGS 

# Decimal Inches Number of Traverse Points on a Diameter


# 2 4 

# 6 8 7.59 

# 3.48 

# 2.29 1.66 44.41 13.00 7.59 5.46 39.00 

# 15.39 10.09 48.52 36.61 16.80 44.41 35.20 49.71 41.91 46.54 50.34 .10 

# 1.35 4.26 7.59 

# 11.75 17.78 34.22 40.25 44.41 47.74 50.65 3/8 

# 0.38

12 1.09 3.48 6.14 9.20 13.00 18.51 33.49 

# 39.00 42.80 45.86 48.52 

# 50.91 

# "' 0



# ~ r 

# "' ;o 

# 0 

# "' (/)DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSION RATE CALCULATiONS LOCATION: BORALBRICK SOURCE: Dryer- Plant5 DATA Run#1 Run#2

Run 113 AVERAGE DATE 09/18/10 09/18/10 09/18/10 RUN TIME (min} 240.00 240.00 240.00 Dn (In) 0.220 0.220 0.220 An (ft2) 2.64E-04 2.64E-04 2.64E-04 AVG DH (In H20)
1.76 1.75 1.76 PATM(InHg) 30.16 30.16

30.16 Pm(inHg) 30.29 30.29

30.29 Ps(GAUGE)

0.10 0.10 0.10 Ps (IN HG} 30.17 30.17 30.17 Tm(F) 84.79 90.13 92.10 Tm(R) 544.48 549.82 551.79 Vm (ft3) 174.75 177.75 176.90 VmSTD(ft3) 171.53 172.78 171.34 VLQ(ml) 144.00 132.00 144.00 WSTD(ft3)

6.79 6.22 6.79 v sro (ftJ) 178.32 179.01 178.14 %M
3.81 3.48 3.81 3.70 %SVP

1 17.54 18.01 16.74 MD 0.962 0.965 0.962 MWD 28.64 28.84 28.84 M 28.42 28.46 28.42 Ts(F) 136.00 137.00 134.21 135.74 Ts(R) 595.69 596.69 593.90 595.43 SUMSQRTDP
41.16 41.00 41.18 NDP 48.00 48.00 48.00 AVGSQRTDP

0.86 0.85 0.86 CP 0.84 0.84 0.84 Vs (ft/s} 51.32 51.14 51.27 51.24 Ds (in) 52.00 52.00 52.00 As (ft2) 14.74 14.74 14.74 QS, FLOW, ACFM 45,389 45,228 45,343
45,320 Q sro (ft31min) 40,563 40,353 40,645

40,520 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM 39,019 38,949 39,096 39,021 WT(gm) 4.56E-12 O.OOE+OO 1.39E-12 0.0000 %1 102.34 103.27 102.03 %C02
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %02 20.90 20.90 20.90 20.90 %CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 %N2 79.10 79.10 79.10 D!F (lbs/hr) 1.37E-10 O.OOE+OO 4.20E-11 5.97E-11 DIF(kglhr} 6.22E-11 O.OOE+OO 1.90E-11 2.71E-11 Production (tph) 14.65 14.65 14.65 1.47E+01 Production (Mg) 6.65E-03 6.65E-03 6.65E-03 6.65E-03 D/F (kg/Mg of Product) 6.8622E-13

0 2.092E-13 2.98E-13 D/F (ngldscm) 9.387E-04 O.OOOE+OO 2.864E-04 4.08E-04 DIF (ng/dscm@ 7% 02)
N/A
NIA
NIA N/A* QS, FLOW, ACMM
1285 1281 1284 1283 QS, FLOW, DSCMM
1105 1103 1107 1105 1 Theoretical amount of moisture that Ts can hold. If %M>%SVP, %SVP will be utilized
In calculations. * Ambient oxygen concentrations, calculation not valid ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA JCR EMISSION TEST PROJECT APPENDIX PAGE No. 137 AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5, SAliSBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010BORALBRICKSISOKINETICDATAANDCALCULATIONSDATE09/18/10SOURCEDryerRun#1POINT#TmA177A177A277A278AJ78A379A479A482AS82A583A683A684A785A785A885A885A985A986AIO86A1086A1186A1186A1286A12868186B186B286B2868386B3868486B48685868586868686868786B786888888888988898881088810888118881188812888128884.79Vm(ft3)ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142K=2.3855TsdpdHSQRTDP1360.701.670.8371360.701.670.8371360.741.770.8601360.741.770.8601360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.681.620.8251360.681.620.8251360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.850.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.850.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.781.860.8831360.551.310.7421360.551.310.7421360.421.000.6481360.421.000.648136.000.741.7841.155Initial10.36Final185.10Total174.75EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010%02%C0220.90.020.901).00APPENDIXPAGENo.138

## BORAL BRICKS 

# ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE!. 

# 09118/10 SOURCE Dryer 

# Run#l POINT



# II
Tm 

# A1



# 87 A1



# 87 A2



# 88 A2

88 A3



# 89 A3



# 90 A4

90 A4

90 A5



# 90 AS



# 90 

# AS

90 A6

90 

# Al

90 

# A7

90 A8



# 90 

# AB

90 A9

90 A9



# 90 A10



# 90 Af(l



# 90 A11

90 A11



# 90 A12

90 A12

90 

# 81

90 81



# 90 

# 82

90 

# 82

90 

# 83

90 133



# 90 

# 84

90 134



# 90 

# 85

90 85

90 86



# 90 

# 86

90 87



# 90 87



# 90 88



# 91 

# 88

91 

# 89

91 

# 89

92 

# 811!

92 

# 81()

92 

# 811

92 

# 811

92 812



# 92 

# 812

92 90.13 Vm(ft3) ATC PROJECT No. P-10142



# K= 

# 2.3873 

# Ts
dp
dH SQRTDP 

# 137 0.66 1.58 0.812 137 0.68 1.58 0.812 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 

# 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.75 1.79 0.666 137 0.75 1.79 0.866 137 0.64 1.53 0.800 137 0.64 1.53 0.800 137 0.76 1.81 0.872 137 0.76 1.81 0.872 137 0.76 1.81 0.872 137 0.76 1.81 0.872 137 0.76 1.81 0.872 137 0.76 1.81 0.872 137 0.77 1.84 0.877 

# 137 0.77 1.84 

# 0.877 137 0.77 1.84 0.877 137 0.77 1.84 0.877 137 0.77 1.84 0.877 137 0.77 1.84 0.877 137 0.77 1.84 0.877 137 0.77 

# 1.84 0.877 137 0.77 1.84 0.877 137 0.77 1.84 0.877 137 0.77 1.84 0.877 137 0.77 1.84 0.877 137 

# 0.60 1.43 

# 0.775 137 0.60 1.43 

# 0.775 137 0.50 1.19 0.707 137 0.50 1.19 0.707 137,00 0.73 

# 1.75 41.001 Initial 

# 187.30 Final 

# 365.05 Total 

# 177.75 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 

## 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER
201 0


# %02 %C02 

# 20.9
0.0 20.90 0.011 APPENDIX PAGE No. 139BORALBRICKSISOKINETICDATAANDCALCULATIONSDATE09118110SOURCEDryerRun#3POINT#TmA193A193A293A293A393A392A492A492A592A592A692A692Al92A792A892A892A992A992A1a92A11J92A1192A1192A1292A129281928192BZ92B292839283928492849285928592136921369213792879288928892899289928109281(}928119281192B12928129292.10Vm(ft3)ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142K•2.3874TsdpdHSQRTDP1360.671.600.8191360.671.600.8191360.741.770.8601360.741.770.8601360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.771.640.8771360.771.640.8771360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.761.810.8721360.76.1.810.8721360.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721350.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.761.810.8721320.741.770.8601320.741.770.8601320.631.500.7941320.631.500.7941320.471.120.6861320.471.120.686134.210.741.7641.176Initial366.20Final543.10Total176.9(1EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010%02%C0220.90.020.900.00APPENDIXPAGENo.140BORALBRICKSMOISTUREDATADryer9/18/2010Run#11stlmp.2ndImp.BEGINNING100100ENDING216102NET1162Run#2tstlmp.2ndImp.BEGINNING100100ENDING214100NET1140Run#31stImp.2ndImp.BEGINNING100100ENDING218100NET1180ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER20103rdImp.4thImp.TOTALS0300.04322.0422.0144.03rdImp.4thImp.TOTALS0300.00318.0018.0132.03rdImp.4thImp.TOTALS0300.00326.0026.0144.0APPENDIXPAGENo.141BORAL BRICKS ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE CALCULATION The following equation establishes the relationship between the velocity head pressure differential and the desired critical orifice pressure drop. The constant,

K, is determined

by the following equation. **LMI=Kx~p** D.H =[846.72xD

4 xMl xc
2 (1-B

) 2 x MdT,,P, Jx A n

@

p
ws M.TP

.p ,s·
· s m ModuleiD Dn dH@ Y, gamma factor Cp Bw(FRACTION,NOT%)

Md Pbar PS(GAUGE)
Ps Tm,F Tm,R Ms Ts,F Ts,R Pm K Terminology BORAL BRICK 9118/2010 Run #1 ATC

i 0.220 1.980 1.000 0.84 0.04 29.0 30.16 0.10 30.17 80 539.69 28.56 125 584.69 30.27 2.3855 Run#2 Run#3 ATC

i ATC

1 0.220 0.220 1.980 1.980 1.000 1.000 0.84 0.84 0.04 0,04 29.0 29.0 30.16 30.16 0.10 0.10 30.17 30.17 90

90 549.69 549.89 28.56 28.56 135
135 594.69 594.69 30.29 30.29 2.3873 2.3874 **Ms~APPARENT** STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT =Md(1-Bw)+18Bw Md=DRY GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT (29) OR =(0.44'%C02)+(0.32*%02)+(0.28'(%N2+%CO)) Ps **GAUGE~STACK** STATIC PRESSURE (IN. H20) **Ps~ABSOLUTE** STACK PRESSURE (IN. Hg) Pm=METER ABSOLUTE PRESSURE (IN. Hg) **~** Pbar
+ (avg dH/13.6) 1 The method

5 sampling !rain is intended
to operate
a! a sampling rate of 0.75 cfm of dry air at 68 oF and 29.92 in. Hg. The orifice meter pressure differential that would produce such
a sampling rate through the orifice
Is designated

as 1\.H@. The theoretical nozzle calculation

is optional.

If the tester feels comfortable choosing the nozzle size through other means (experience, prior testing, etc.), this is also acceptable.
On (theoretical)

is calculated
on the assumption that a 0.75 cfm ftowrate

is achieved
at 68 °F and 29.92 in. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

Hg. EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENOIX PAGE No. 142BORAL BRICKS SAMPLE CALCULA T!ONS BORALBRICK Plant5 Run#1 1) ABSOLUTE PRESSURE

IN DRY GAS METER Pm = P ATM
+ AVG DH/13.6 PATM Avg.DH 30.16 1.76 **~** ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE Ps = P ATM
+ Ps(GAUGE)/13.6 PATM Ps(GAUGE) 30.16

0.1

Pm 30.29 Ps 30.17 3) SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS VM STD
= (VMr(Y)'(T STDffM)'(PMIP STD) Vm
Tm

y VmSTD TSTD= PSTD= 174.75 544.48 1.000 171.53
ft3 4) VOLUME OF WATER COLLECTED, CORRECTED
TO STANDARD CONDITIONS W STD = W STOW+ WSTDsg W STOw= (.002a73)'(VLQw)'(T STOlP STD) W STDsg

= (.002668)'\/LQsg)"(T STDIP STD) WHERE 0.002673

= 0.04707 FT31ML'IN. HG/17.64 OEG. R. WHERE 0.002668

= 0.04715 FTSIG'IN.HG/17.84 DEG. R. VLQ (w) 122.00 VLO (sg) 22.00 WSTD 6.79 ft3 5} TOTAL SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS VSTD •Vm STD + W STD=
178.32 ft3 6) P>;RCENT MOISTURE

IN STACK GAS %M

• (100)•(VV STD)N STD"
3.81% 7) MOLE FRACTION OF DRY GAS
0.962

528 DEG R. 29.92 IN. HG ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS 4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 143BORAL BRICKS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS (continued) BORALBRICK Plant
5 Run#1 8) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE DRY GAS MWO
= (%C02.0.44)+(02'0.32)+((%CO+%N2)'0.28) %C02 %02 %CO 0.0 20.9

0.0 9) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE WET GAS M = (MWD)"(MD)

+ 18(1-MD)
=
%N2 79.1 WHERE 18 =MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF WATER, GIG-MOLE 10) STACK VELOCITY VS = (85.49)'(CP)"((TS!(PS)(M))"112'((SUM

SORT OP)IN DP)) where 85.49
= fVsec" **f!b/lb-mo!e~in.Hg)/(deg.**

R"ln H20}]"'0.5 CP 0.84

Ts (R) 595.69 SUMSQRT 41.16 11) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE QS = (60)'(VSr(AS) AS **(lnle~** 14.74

NDP 48 OS 45,389 MWD 28.84 28.42
vs 51.32 12) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, STANDARD CONDITIONS INCLUDING MOISTURE Q STD = Q STD DRYIMD

40,583 13) STACK VOLUME FLOW RATE STANDARD CONDITIONS DRY Q STD DRY= 17.647'60'Md'Vs'A'(Psffs(R))

= 39,019 14} POLLUTANT MASS RATE, CONCENTRATION BASIS PMRC
= (.1323)'(WT)'(Q STD)N STD WHERE 0.1323

• COMBINED CONVERSION FACTOR (60 MINIHR'0.00220 LBSIGRAM) WT(GRAMS) 0.0000 15) PERCENT ISOKINETIC

PMRC o.ooo %1:;:. (0.09450"Ts•vm **std)/{Ps"Vs"'An"Time~Md)** Run Time Area of Nozzle 240 2.64E-04 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

%1 102.34 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 144BORAL BRICKS PLANT6 FIELD DATA CALCULATIONS ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PlANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER
201 D APPENDIX PAGE No. 147BORALBRICKSANALYTICALTESTINGCONSULTANTS,INC.InitialSourceSurveyTestDate09/2'1/10CompanyBORALBRICKAddressCity,StateSalisbury,NCProcessTestedDIFFBaghouseOutletSpecificSourceKiln 6AirPollutionControlsDIFFBaghouseOutletTestMethods1-5,26AATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.158

# ~ 

# ., ;o 

# 2 m



# ~ 

# z

**~** 

# 1: =:



# ... "' 

# 8 em 

# "'., -jl> 

# ,o 

# "'.,, m>m -uzs:



# ;;:l~Ci5

**;;:""'"~** 

# ,,.o

**~tnz**



# - -l "'cnm

**~)>CI.l** 

# or-<

(ii-u 

# "'"' co

**,~** 

# -<m 

# .,o 

# s;:-l :!i 

# "'

10 

# ., m 

# z 0 

# x



# ~ m 

# z

**~**

**~** 

# 18 

# Method 1 - Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources (Circular Stack) Distance- Far Wall to Outside of Port (in) Distance
- Near Wall to Outside of Port (in) Inside Diameter of Stack (in) 

# 84.50 9.50 Port Length 

# 75.00

Port Diameter- For Ref. Only (in) 4.00 Distance to Upstream Disturbance (It) 

# Distance to Downstream Disturbance 

# (ft) Diameters Upstream Diameters Downstream Minimum Distance to Stack Wall (Default is 1.0 inch) 

# 25.00 40.00

4.00 6.40 1.00 Traverse Point Number 

# 1 2 

# 3 4 5 6 

# 7 

# 8 9 10 

# ii 

# 12 Conversion Table lor Decimal to Inch Fraction 1116 

# 1/8 3/16 

# 1/4 5/16 0.06 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 PROBE MARKINGS Decimal inches Number of Traverse Points on a Diameter



# 2 4 6 

# 8 20.45 14.53 

# 12.80 11.90 73.55 

# 28.25 20.45 17.38 65.75 31.70 24.05 79.48 62.30 33.73 73.55 60.28 81.20 69.95 76.63 82.10 

# 10 11.45 15.65 

# 20.45 26.45 35.15 58.85 67:55 73.55 78.35 82.55 3/8 0.38



# 12 11.08 14.53 18.35 22.78 28.25 

# 36.20 57.80 65.75 71.23 

# 75.65 79.48 82.93 

# "' 0 :0 )> 

# r 

# "' 2l 0 

# "' 00ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142BORALBRICKSPM,HCL,HF,Cl2RATECALCULATIONSLOCATION:BORALBRICKSOURCE:DIFFBaghouseOutletDATARunil1Run#2Run#3AVERAGEDATfi09/21/1009l21f1009/21/10RUNTIME(min)60.0060.0060.00Dn(In)0.2890.2890.289An(ft2)4.56E-044.56E.044.56E..04AVGDH(inHZO)2.051.992.01PATM(JnHg)29.3129.3629.40Pm(lnHg)29.4629.5129.55Ps(GAUGE}0.250.250.25Ps(INHG)29.3329.3829.42rm(F)74.9685.5897.17Tm{R}534.65545.27556.86Vm{ft3)45.7243.9245.12VmSTD(ft3}44.2341.7342.04VLQ(ml)33.0059.0049.00WSTD(f13)1.562.782.31vsro{ff3145.7944.5144.35%MSA-O6.255.21%SVP1100.00100.00100.00MD0.9660.931l0.948MWD29.0729.0729.06M28.6928.3828.48Ts(F}365.25371.79376.04Ts(R)824.94831.48835.73SUMSQRTDP15.53 15.2515.12NDP24.0024.0024.00AVGSQRTDP0.650,640.63CP0.840.840.84V.s{ftls)46.0245.5745.19Os(in)75.0075.0075.00As(ft2J30.6630.68QS,FLOW,ACFM84,71583,88483,184QSTD(tt3/min)53,14952,30351,673Q$TDDRY,FLOW$CFM51,34349,03448,981WT(gm)-PM0.00150.00000.00100.00030.00030.0002WT(gm}·HF0.00000,00000.0000WT(gm)-Cf20.13480.00000.0064'"96.7595,5896.39%C022.002.132.03%0218.3618,3618.39%CO0.000.000.00%N279.5879.5179.59PM(lbs/hr)0.2460.0000.154PM(kglhr}0.11150.00000.0699ProducUon(tph)20.2620.2620.26Production(Mg)9.19E*039.19E-039,19E-03PM{kg!MgofProduct)1.74E-04O.OOE+OOi.09E-04PM(mgldscm)1.2SE4-00O.OOE+OOBAOE-01PM(mgldscm@7%02}7.00E+OOO.OOE-+004.ase.;.ooHCI(Jbslhr)5.07E*023.93E..Q23.35E..02HCI(kglhr)2.30E·021.78E-021.52E..(l2HCJ(kg!MgofProduct)3.59E-052.755..052.36E..05HCJ(ppm}223.24\76.05151.57HCI(ppm@7%02)1222.89984.40838.49HF(lbslhr)4.41E·034.68E-034.305-03HF(kglhr)2.00E*032.12E-031.95E*03HF(kg!MgofProduct)3.12E·063.28E-063.04E-06HF(ppm)10.6611.5010.69HF(ppm@7%OZ)231.42249.66232.28Cl2(Jbs/hr}2.07E+012.24E-039.8SE-01C/2(Kglhr)9.39E+OO1.02E-034.48E-01Cl2{Xg!MgofProduct)1.47E-021.57E-06a.97E.04Cl2(ppm)177371.9219.498704.72C/2(ppm@7%02)118251.8012.995798.54QS,FLOW,ACMM239923752355QS,FLOW.DSCMM145413881387•TheororlcMofmoisturethatTscanhold.If%M>%SVP,%SVPw!JibeutilizedIncalcu/atlons,EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER20104.95371.03-830.7245.5983,92852,37549,78S0.00090,00030.00000.04712.0818.370.1330,060520.2&9.19E·039.43E·OS7.06S-Q13.8SE+OO4.UE..021J37E-02.2.SOE..05183.621008.594.46E-032.02E-033.14E..0610.95237.797.23E+OO3.286+005.12E·03$2.032.0441354.4423761410APPENDIXPAGENo.160ISOKINET!C DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09/21110 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet Run#1

K= 4.8798 POINT#

Tm

fs
dp dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 Ai

70 364 0.40 1.95 0.632 18.4

2.1 A2

70 363 0.41 2.00 0.640 A3

71 365 0.42 2.05 0.648 A4

72 365 0.42 2.05 0.648 A5

73 365 0.42 2.05 0.648 A6

73 365 0.42 2.05 0.648 A7

73 365 0.44 2.15 0.663 18.4
2.2 A8

74 364 0.45 2.20 0.671 A9

75 364 0.40 1.95 0.632 A10

75 364 0.41 2.00 0.640 A11

76 360 0.41 2.00 0.640 A12

76 360 0.43 2.10 0.656 81

76 369 0.39 1.90 0.624 18.5
2.0 82

76 368 0.40 1.95 0.632 83

76 368 0.43 2.10 0.656 84

77 368 0.43 2.10 0.656 85

77 370 0.44 2.15 0.663 86

77 370 0.45 2.20 0.671 87

77 370 0.45 2.20 0.671 18.5
2.0 88

77 370 0.45 2.20 0.671 89

77 365 0.42 2.05 0.648 810

77 364 0.40 1.95 0.632 811

77 360 0.39 1.90 0.624 812

77 360 0.38 1.85 0.616 74.96 365.25 0.42 2.05 15.534 18.45 2.08 corrected per 7e-5b 18.36 Vm(ft3) Initial 750.26

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)
7$.56 Final Total ATC PROJECT No. P-10142 795.98 45.72 %Excess Air EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

695.04 APPENDIX PAGE No. 161

### BORAL BRICKS 

# fSOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 

# 09121/10 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet 

# Run#2



# K= 4.9267 POINT#

Tm



# rs
dp
dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1



# 82 370 0.40 1.97 0.632
18.4
2.2 A2



# 82 370 0.40 1.97 0.632 

# A3

82 

# 372 0.42 2.07 0.648 

# A4

82 372 0.42 2.07 0.646 

# A5

83 375 0.42 2.07 0.648 A6



# 83 375 0.45 2.22 0.671 A7



# 84 369 0.43 2.12 0.656 18.4


# 2.2 A8



# 84 369 0.43 2.12 0.656 A 

## !I



# 85 

# 368 0.40 1.97 0.632 

# A10

85 366 0.40 1.97 0.632 A11



# 86 366 0.39 1.92 0.624 A12

86 359 0.39 1.92 0.624 81



# 87 365 0.38 1.87 0.616 13.4

2.1 82

87 375 0.37 1.82 0.608 83

87 378 0.37 1.82 0.608 

# 84



# 87 380 0.42 2.07 0.648 

# 85

87 381 

# 0.42 2.07 0.648 

# 86

87 377 

# 0.42 2.07 0.648 87

88 375 0.43 2.12 0.656 18.6


# 2.0 88

88 375 0.43 2.12 0.656 

# 89

88 378 0.40 1.97 0.632 

# 810

88 379 0.37 1.82 0.608 811

88 

# 365 0_38 1.87 

# 0.616 812



# 88 364 0.36 1.77 0.600 85.58 

# 371.79 0.40 

# 1.99 

# 15.251 18.45 

# 2.13 corrected per 7e-5b 18.36 Vm(ft3) Initial 

# 796.03

% 

## N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)
79.51 Final 

## Total ATC PROJECT No. P-10142 

# 839.95 43.92 %Excess Air EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 

### 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010



# 698.53 APPENOIX PAGE No. 162BORALBRICKS!SOKINETICDATAANDCALCULATIONSDATE09/21/10SOURCEDIFFBaghouseOutletRun#3K=5.0614POINT#TmTsdpdHSQRTDP%02%C02A1943800.381.920.61618.32.2A2943810.381.920.616A3953810.381.920.616A4953800.381.920.616A5953780.402.020.632A6953780.442.230.663Al953780.442.230.66318.52.0A8963780.442.230.663A9963740.412.080.640MO963740.412.080.640A11973700.412.080.640A12973660.381.920.616B1973770.361.820.60018.52.0B2973800.361.620.60083983810.361.820.60084993800.402.020.632B599:lao0.402.020.632B!i993790.412.080.64087993790.412.080.64018.61.988993750.432.180.656B91003740.442.230.6638101003700.402.020.6328111003680.361.820.6008121003640.361.820.60097.17376.040.402.0115.12318.482.03correctedper'1e-5b18.31}Vm(ft3)Initial839.63%N2(BYDIFFERENCE)79.59FinalTotalATCPROJECTNo.P-10142884.7545.12%ExcessAirEPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010700.83APPENDIXPAGENo.163

## BORAL BRICKS 

# ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE CALCULATION The fallowing equation establishes the relationship between the velocity head pressure differential and the desired critical orifice pressure drop. 

# Ml=I<:x!1p The constant,

K, 

# is determined

by the following equation. 

# [

M T 

# PJ Ml= 

# 846.72xDn

4 

# xM-/@xc

2 

# (1-B

.) 2 

# x d"'

s 

# xtl.n '
P


# ws 

# M TP

r 

# S s m Module ID Dn dH@ 

# Y, gamma factor Cp Bw(FRACT/ON,NOT"/o)

Md Pbar 

# PS(GAUGE) 

# Ps Tm,F 

# Tm,R Ms 

# Ts, F 

# Ts, R 

# Pm K BORAL BRICK 912112010 

# Run#1 Run#2 Run#3 ATC4 ATC4 ATC4 0.289 0.289 0.289 

# 1.951 1.951 1.951 0.995 0.995 

# 0.995 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.05 0.05 0.05 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.31 29.36 29.40 0.25 0.25 0.25 29.33 29.38 29.42 80



# 85 100 539.69 544.69 559.69 28.45 28.45 28.45 365 365 365 824.69 824.69 824.69 29.42 29.46 29.51 4.8798 4.9267 5.0614 

# Terminology Ms=APPARENT STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT =Md(1-Bw)+188w Md=DRY GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT (29) OR =(0.44*%C02)+(0.32*%02)+(0.26*(%N2+%CO)) Ps GAUGE=STACK STATIC PRESSURE (IN. H20) Ps=ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE (IN. Hg) Pm=METER ABSOLUTE PRESSURE 

# (IN. Hg) 

# = Pbar
+ 

# (avg dH/13.6) 'The method

5 sampling train is intended
to operate
at a sampling rate of 0.75 cfm of dry air at 68 oF and 29.92 in. Hg. The orifice meter pressure differential that would produce such
a sampling rate throuoh the orifice
is desiqnated

as LlH,.. The theoretical nozzle calculation

is optional.

If the tester feels comfortable choosing the nozzle size through other means (experience, prior testing, etc.), this is also acceptable.
On (theoretical)

is calculated
on the assumption that a 0. 75 elm flowrate

is achieved
at 6B °F and 29.92 in. Ho ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 

## 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 164BORALBRICKSSAMPLECALCULATIONSBORALBRICKSalisbury,NCRun#11)ABSOLUTEPRESSUREINDRYGASMETERPm=PATM+AVGDH/13.6PATMAvg.DH29.312.052)ABSOlUTESTACKPRESSUREPs=PATM•·Ps(GAUGE)/13.6PATMPs(GAUGE)29.310.25Pm29.46Ps29.333)SAMPLEVOLUMEATSTANDARDCOIIDITIONSVMSTD=(VM)•(Y)•(TSTDITM)•(PMIPSTD)VmTmyVmSTD45.72534.650.99544.23TSTD=PSTD=ft34)VOLUMEOFWATERCOLLECTED,CORRECTEDTOSTANDARDCONDITIONSWSTD=WSTOw+WSTDsgWSTOw=(.002673)'(VLQw)'(TSTDIPSTD)WSTDsg=(.002668)'VLQsg)'(TSTOlPSTD)WHERE0.002673=0.04707FT3fML•JN.HG/17.64DEG.R.WHERE0.002668•0.04715FT3JG•JN.HG/17.64DEG.R.VLQ{w)25.00VLQ{sg)s.ooWSTD1.56ft35)TOTALSAMPLEVOLUMEATSTANDARDCONDITIONSVSTD=VmSTD+WSTD=45.79ft36)PERCENTMOISTUREINSTACKGAS%M=(100)•(WSTD)NSTD=.3.40tlfo7)MOLEFRACTIONOFDRYGASMD==(100-%M)/100=0.966528DEGR.29.92IN.HGATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.165SAMPLECALCULATIONS(continued)BORALBRICKS<Jiisbury,NCRun#18)MOLECULARWEIGHTOFTHEDRYGASMWD=(%C02'0A4)+(02•0.32)+((%CO+%N2)'0.28)%C02%02%CO2.118.40.09)MOLECULARWEIGHTOFTHEWETGASM=(MWDt(MD)+18(1-MD)=%N279.6WHERE18=MOLECULARWEIGHTOFWATER,GIG-MOLE10)STIICKVELOCITYVS=(85.49)'(CP).((TSI(PS)(M))'112.((SUMSORTDP)INDP))where85.49=ftlsec"'[lbflb-mole;O"in.Hg)/(deg.R*inH20}1110.5CP0.84Ts(R)824.94SUMSORT15.5311)STACKVOLUMETRICFLOWRATEQS=(60)'(VS)'(AS)AS(lnleQ30.68NDP24QS84,715MWD29.0728.69vs48.0212)STACKVOLUMETRICFLOW1<1\TE,STANDARDCONDITIONSINCLUDINGMOISTUREQSTD=QSTDDRY/MD53,14913)STACKVOLUMEFLOWRATESTANDARDCONDITIONSDRYQSTDDRY=17.647'60'Md'Vs•A'(Pstrs(R))=51,34314)POLLUTANTMASSRATE,CONCENTRATIOMBASISPMRC=(.1323)'(WT)•(QSTD)NSTDWHERE0.1323=COMBINEDCONVERSIONFACTOR(60MINIHR'0.00220LBSIGRAM)WT(GRAMS)0.001615)PERCENTISOKINETICPMRC0.246%1={0.09450"Ts*VmRunrimeAreaofNozzle604.56E-04ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142%!96.75EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4 &5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.166BORAL BRICKS ANAL YT!CAL TESTING CONSULTANTS,
INC. initial Source Survey Test Date 09/21/10 Company BORAL BRICK Address City, Slats Salisbury, NC Process Tested DIFF Baghouse Outlet Specific Source Kiln 6 Air Pollution Controls DIFF Baghouse Outlet Test Methods US EPA M29 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 179

# E' :!'< 0 

# " 

# 2 m

# ~ 

# z ? 

# !'**~** 

# " .,. 

# "'

Glm 

# c.,**~,.** 

# >c; 

# w""' mr;;m "Uz;: 

# -<-;- 

# mwW S::,::..SQ 

# "'"'0**~Olz**



# - -; 

# "'wm**~)>(/)** 

# or-<

1ii-u 

# "'"' co**,~** 

# -<m 

# ,o r;;-<**~** 

# "' 

# '" ., m 

# z 0 

# x

# ~ m 

# z 0**~** 

# gj 

# Method 1
- Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources (Circular Stack) Distance- Far Wall to Outside.of Port (in) Distance
- Near Wall to Outside of Port (in) Inside Diameter of Stack (in) 

# 84.50 9.50 Port Length 

# 75.00

Port Diameter- For Ref. Only (in) 4.00 Distance to Upstream Disturbance (ft) 

# Distance to Downstream Disturbance (ft) Diameters Upstream Diameters Downstream Minimum Distance to Stack Wall (Default is 1.0 inch) 

# 25.00 40.00

4.00 6.40 1.00 Traverse Point Number 

# 1 2 

# 3 4 5 

# 6 1 

# 8 9 10 

# 11 

# 12 Conversion Table for Decimal to Inch Fraction 1/16 

# 1/8 3/16 1/4 5116 0.06 0.13 0.19 0.25 

# 0.31 PROBE MARKINGS Decimal Inches Number of Traverse Points on a Diameter


# 2 4 

# 6 

# 8 20.45 

# 14.53 12.80 11.90 73.55 

# 28.25 20.45 17.38 65.75 31.70 24.05 79.48 62.30 33.73 73.55 

# 60.28 81.20 69.95 76.63 

# 82.10 

# 10 11:45 

# 15.65 20.45 26.45 35.15 58.85 67.55 73.55 78.35 

# 82,55 

# 3/8 0.38



# 12 11.08 14.53 18.35 22.78 28.25 36.20 57.80 65.75 71.23 

# 75.65 79.48 

# 82.93 Ol 

# 0

# ~ 

# ,... Ol 

# ;o 

# 0 

# "' (f)BORALBRICKSMETALEMISSIONRATECALCULATIONLOCATION:BORALBRICKSOURCE:·DIFFBaghouseOutletDATARun#1Run#2Run#JAVERAGEDATE09/2111009/21/1009/21110RUNTIME(min)60.0060.0060.00Dn(in)0.2890.2890.289An(ft2)4.56E-044.56E-044.56E-04AVGDH(inH20)2.062.042.01PATM(inHg)29.4129.3529.32Pm(inHg)29.5629.5029.47Ps(GAUGE)0.250.250.25Ps(INHG)29.4329.3729.34Tm(F)101.04106.00101.08Tm(R)560.73565.69560.77Vm(ft3)47.5046.1845.89VmSTD(ft3)43.9742.2842.34VLQ(ml)51.0050.0060.00WSTD(ft3)2.402.392.86VSTD(ft3)46.3744.6745.19%M5.Hl5.346.325.62%SVP;100.00100.00100.00MD0.9480.9470.937MWD29.0729.0829.06M28.5028.4928.36rs(F)389.25 388.29389.63389.05Ts(R)848.94847.98849.32 848.75SUMSQRTDP15.4215.3215.29NDP24.0024.0024.00AVGSQRTDP0.640.640.64CP0.840.840.84Vs(fils)46.4146.1646.2146.26Ds(in)75.0075.0075.00As(ft2)30.6830.6830.68QS,FLOW,ACFM85,438 84,96385,06485,155QSTD(ft3/mln)52,26551,92751,85452,016qQSTDDRY,FLOWSCFM49,55549,15548,57649,095rL(.-v·'>t)'(/o.tATCPROJECTNo.P-10142WT(gm)0.00210.62310.06260.2293%!99.6596.6197.89%C022.082.132.032.08%0218.4518.4518.4818.46%CO0.000.000.00%N279.4779.4279.491TheoreticalamountofmoisturethatTscanhofd.lf%M>%SVP,%SVPwillbeutilizedincalculations.EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.181BORALBRICKS!SOKINETICDATAANDCALCULATIONSDATE09/21/10SOURCEDIFFBaghouseOutletRun#1K=5.0001POINT#TmT.sdpdHSQRTDP%Q7%C02A1983900.402.000.63219.01.6A2983900.402.000.632A3983900.412.05·>.<;:;:·/·0.640A4983910.422.100.648A5993910.432.150.656A6993910.432.150.656A7993910.432.150.65619.11.5A81003910.442.200.663A91003900.442.200.663A101013900.402.000.632A111013900.402.000.632A121013890.391.950.624811023900.381.900.61619.01.6821023910.381.900.616831023910.422.100.648B41023910.422.100.648851023900.422.100.648861033870.432.150.656871033870.452.250.67119.01.7881033870.442.200.663891033880.412.050.640811)1033880.391.950.6248111043840.391.950.6248121043840.391.950.624101.04389.250.412.0615.41719.031.60correctedper7e-5/:J19.03Vm(ft3)Initial884.91%N2(BYDIFFERENCE)79.38Final932.41Total47.50%ExcessAir985.75ATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4&5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.182BORAL BRICKS ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCUI.ATIONS DATE 09/:21!10 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet Run#2

K= 4.9975 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp
dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1
102 389 0.41 2.05 0.640
19.2
1.4 A2
102 389 0.41 2.05 0.640 A3
103 389 0.41 2.05 0.640 A4
103 389 0.42 2.10 0.648 A5
104 390 0.45 2.25 0.671 A6
105 390 0.45 2.25 0.671 A7
105 387 0.40 2.00 0.632
19.0
1.5 A8
105 388 0.41 2.05 0.640 A9
105 388 0.41 2.05 0.640 A10
106 388 0.39 1.95 0.624 A11
106 388 0.39 1.95 0.624 A12
107 385 0.39 1.95 0.624 81
107 390 0.38 1.90 0.616
19.1

1.5 82
108 390 0.38 1.90 0.616 83
108 389 .,Q,,38 1.90 0.616 84
108 391 0.4o·

· 2.00 0.632 85
109 391 0.40 2.00 0.632 86
108 387 0.42 2.10 0.648 87
108 387 0.42 2.10 0.648
18.9
1.7 B8
107 387 0.46 2.30 0.678 89
107 386 0.45 2.25 0.671 810
107 386 0.38 1.90 0.616 811
107 387 0.39 1.95 0.624 812.
107 388 0.39 1.95 0.624 106.1)0 388.29 0.41 2.04 15.322 19.05 1.53 corrected per 7 e-5b 19.05 Vm(ft3) Initial 933.61

% N2. (BY DIFFERENCE}
79.43 Final Total ATC PROJECT No. P-10142 979.78 46.18 %Excess Air EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

993.12 APPENDIX PAGE No. 183BORAL BRICKS ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09/21/10 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet Run#3

K= 4.9440 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp
dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1
100 391 0.40 1.98 0.632
19.3
1.3 A2
100 386 0.40 1.98 0.632 A3
100 387 0.40 1.98 0.632 A4
100 387 0.41 2.03 0.640 A5
100 387 0.45 2.22 0.671 AS

101 388 0.45 2.22 0.671 A7

101 389 0.47 2.32 0.686
19.1
1.5 A8
102 389 0.40 1.98 0.632 A9
103 390 0.41 2.03 0.640 A10
103 391 0.41 2.03 0.640 A11
103 390 0.38 1.88 0.616 A12
102 388 0.38 1.88 0.616 81
102 392 0.37 1.83 0.608 19.0
1.5 82
102 394 0.37 1.83 D.608 83
101 394 0.38 1.88 0.616 84

101 394 0.40 1.98 0.632 85

101 393 0.41 2.03 0.640 86

101 393 0.41 2.03 0.640 87

101 389 0.41 2.03 0.640 18.9
1.6 88

101 388 0.46 2.27 0.678 89

101 390 0.45 2.22 0.671 810
100 386 0.39 1.93 0.624 811
100 388 0,37 1.83 0.608 1312
100 387 0.37 1.83 0.608 101.08 389.63 0.41 2.01 15.287 19.08 1.48 corrected per 7e-5b 19.08 Vm(ft3) Initial 980.03

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)
79.45 Final 1025.91 Total 45.89 %Excess Air 1004.05 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PlANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 184· Run #1 BEGINNING ENDING NET Run#2 BEGINNING ENDING NET Run#J BEGINNING ENDING NET ATC PROJECT No. P-10142
BORAL BRICKS MOiSTURE DATA Kiln6 912112010 1st Imp. 2nd Imp. 3rdl4th Imp. 100 100 200 140 100 200 40

0

0 1stlmp. 2nd Imp. 3rd/4th Imp. 100 100 200 750 650 -100 -200 1stlmp. 2nd Imp. 3rdl4th Imp. 100 100 200 760 660 -100 -200 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

5th Imp. TOTALS 300.0 311.0 11.0 51.0 5th Imp. TOTALS 300.0 -300.0 50.0 5th Imp. TOTALS 300.0 -300.0 60.0 APPENDIX PAGE No. 185BORAL BRICKS ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE CALCULATION The following equation establishes the relationship between the velocity head pressure differential and the desired critical orifice pressure drop. t:Jl
= Kxflp The constant,

K, is determined

by the following equation. I:!,H =[846.72xD: xi:!,H@ **xc~** (1-Bws

) 2 x **Md~nP,** Jxf'..p MsT.Pm Module ID Dn dH@ Y, gamma factor Cp Bw(FRACT/01\1,1\/0T'/a)

Md Pbar PS(GAUGE)
Ps Tm,F Tm,R Ms is, F Ts, R Pm K BORAL BRICK 9121/2010 Run#1 Run#2 RunttJ ATC4 ATC4 ATC4 0.289 0.289 0.289 1.951 1.951. 1.951 0.995 0.995 0.995 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.05 0.05 0.05 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.41 29.35 29.32 0.25 0.25 0.25 29.43 29.37 29.34 100 105
105 559.69 564.69 564.69 28.45 28.45 28.45 375 380
390 834.69 839.69 849.69 29.52 29.58 29.50 5.0001 4.9975 4.9440 Terminology Ms=APPARENT STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT =Md(1-Bw)+18Bw Md=DRY GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT (29) OR =(044*%C02)+(0.32*%02)+(0.28.(%N2+%CO)) Ps GAUGE=STACK STATIC PRESSURE (IN. H20) Ps"ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE (IN. Hg) Pm=METER ABSOLUTE PRESSURE (IN. Hg) = Pbar + (avg dH/13.6) 1 The method

5 sampling train is intended

to operate
at a sampling rate of 0.75 cfm of dry air at 68 oF and 29.92 in. Hg. The orifice meter pressure differential that would produce such
a sampling rate throuah the orifice
is desionated
as L'.H.,. The lheoreticaU1ozzle calculation

is optional.

If the tester feels comfortable choosing the nozzle size through other means (experience, prior testing, etc.), this is also acceptable.
Dn (theoretical)

is calculated
on the assumption that a D. 75 cfm flowrate

is achieved

at 68 °F and 29.92 in. Ho ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 186BORAL BRICKS SAMPLE CALCULATIONS BORALBRICK Salisbury, NC Run#1 1) ABSOLUTE PRESSURE

IN DRY GAS METER Pm "'P ATM
+ AVG DH/13.6 PATM Avg. OH 29.41 2.06 2) ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE Ps"' P ATM + Ps(GAUGE}I13.6 PATM Ps{GAUGE) 29.41 0.25

Pm 29.56 29.43 3} SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS VM STD **"'{VM)~(Yt(T** STD/TM)*{PMIF' STO) Vm
Tm

y VmSTD 47.50 560.73 0.995 4-3.97

T STD-= PSTD: ft3 4) VOLUME OF WATER COLLECTE0

1 CORRECTED
TO STANDARD CONDITIONS W STD

"' W STOw+ WSTOsg W STDw = **(.002673)~(VLQw}"•(T** STOlP STD) W STDsg **""(.002668)~VLQsg)~(T** STD/P STD} WHERE 0.002673

= 0.04707 FT31ML*IN. HG/17.64 DEG. R WHERE 0.002668

= 0.04715 FT31G"IN.HGf17.64 DEG. R. VLQ (w} 40.00 VLQ (sg) 11.00 WSTD 2.40
ft3 5) TOTAL SAMPLE VOlUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS VSTD=-VmSTD+WSTD=

46.37 ft3 8) PERCENT MOISTURE

IN STACK GAS %M = (100)"{VV STD)N STD = 5.19% 7) MOLE FRAC'fiON or DRY GAS MD"' (10Q.-%M)/100

=

0.948

528 DEG R. 29.92 IN, HG ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 187tiUKAL BHICKS SAMPLE CALCULA T!ONS (continued) BORALBRICK Salisbury, NC Run#1· 8) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE DRY GAS MWD = (%CO:a:·o.44)+{02"'0.32}+(\%CO+%N2)"0.28} %C02 %02 %CO 1.6 19.0

0.0 9) MOlECUlAR WEIGHT OF THE WET GAS M = (MWDt(MD)

+ **18(1~MD)**
=
%N2 79.5 WHERE 18 =MOLECULAR WEIGHT Of WATER, GfG-MOLE 10} STACK VELOCITY VS "" **(85A9)~(CP)"({TS/{PS)(M))I\if2~((SUM**

SORT DP)IN DP}) where 85.4-9 **""ft!sec~** UbJ!b-moJe•!n.Hg)/(deg.

**R~in** H20)J"0.5 CP 0.84

Ts (R) 848.94 SUM SQRT 15.42 11) STACK VOLUME:TRJC FLOW RATE QS, (60)"{VS)'(AS) AS {tn!et) 30.68

NOP 24 QS 85.477 MWO 29.04 28.41
VS 46.44 12) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, STANDARD CONO!TlONS INCLUDING MOISTURE Q STD"'

0 STD DRY/MD

52,289 13} STACK VOLUME FLOW RATE STANDARD CONDITIONS DRY Q STD DRY= **17.647~60#Md'Vs~A'"{P$1Ts{R))**

=- 49,577 14) POLLUTANT MASS RATE,. CONCENTRATION BASiS PMRC = (.1323}"(WT)"(Q STD)N STD WHERE 0.1323 =COMBINED CONVERSION FACTOR (GO **MINIHR~0.00220** LBS/GRAM) WT(GRAMS} 0.0021 15) PERCENT ISOKINET!C

PMRC 0.313 %1 = {0.09450"Ts*Vm **std)/(Ps~vs•Arnime'Md)** Run Time Area of Nozzle

%! 60 4.56E-04 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

99.-61 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 188Run# ATC PROJECT No. P-10142
tiUKAL tiKIVK:S EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 189Metal Antimony {Sb 7440-36-0) Arsenic (As 7440.38-2) Barium (Ba 7 440-39-3) Beryllium {Be 7440-41-7} Cadmium {Cd 7440..43-9) Chromium (Cr 744Q-47-3) Cobalt (Co 7 440-48-4) Copper (Cu 7440-50-8) Magnesium {Mg 7439-95-4) Manganese {Mn 7439-96-5) Mercury (Hg 7439-97-5) Nickel (NI 7440-02-0) Phosphorus

{P 7723.-14-0) Selenium (Se 7782-49-2) Silver {Ag 7440<22-4} Thsllium (11 7 ..:140..28-0) Zinc {Zn 7440-66-6) ATC PROJECT No. P-10142
BORAL BRICKS Multiple Metals Emission Rate Summary Client: Bora! Bricks location: Salisbury, NC Date: 9/2112010 Source: Plant
6 Outlet Lbs/hr kglhr 3.91E-04 1.77E-04 1.40E-04 6.37E-05 1.66E-03 7.53E-04 1.98E-05 8.99E-06 1.18E-04 5.34E-05 4.73E-04 2.15E-04 1.18E-04 5.34E-05 2.79E-04 1.26E-04 9.79E-04 4.44E-04 1.04E-03 4.73E-04 5.51E-04 2.50E-04 1.16E-03 5.24E-04 5.91E-03 2.68E-03 4.17E-04 1.89E-04 1.98E-04 8.99E-05 1.98E-O'I 8.99E-05 9.76E-04 4.43E-04 kg/Mg of Product 2.65E-07 9.43E-08 1.13E-06 1.34E-08 7.98E-08 3.23E-07 7.98E-08 1.89E-07 6.75E-07 7.04E-07 3.74E-07 7.94E-07 4.01E-06 2.83E-07 1.34E-07 1.34E-07 6.60E-07 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010' mg/dsem mg/dscm

@ 7% 02 2.01E-03 1.06E-02 7.22E-04 3.83E-03 8.51E-03 4.51E-02 1.02E-04 5.39E-04 6.04E-04 3.20E-03 2.43E-03 1.29E-02 6.05E-04 3.21E-03 1.43E-03 7.59E-03 5.01E-03 2.65E-02 5.36E-03 2.84E-02 2.83E-03 1.50E-02 5.91E-03 3.14E-02 3.04E-02 1.61E-01 2.14E-03 1.13E-02 1.02E-03 5.39E-03 1.02E-03 5.39E-03 5.01E-03 2.66E-02 APPENDIX PAGE No. 190ANALYTICAL TESTING CONSULTANTS,
INC. Initial Source Surw;w · Test Date 09/22/10 Company BORAL BRICK Address City, State Salisbury, NC Process Tested DIFF Baghouse Outlet Specific Source Kiln 6 Air Pollution Controls DIFF Baghouse Outlet Test Methods USEPA M23 ATC PROJECT No. P-1 0142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER
201 0 APPENDIX PAGE No. 201

# )> 

# ~ " :0 

# 2 m 

# <:1 

# if 

# E :1



# ... N


# a c:m (l)v 

# -<" 

# "o ro""' mS::m -oz;:: 

# -<-<- men[/)



# ~~§ "'"'z



# ..... Nrom

**~):>Cf.l** 

# or-<



# c;;-o 

# "'"' co

**:o~** 

# -:m 

# -o<:1



# ~ .... 

# "'

)> 

# " " m 

# z 0 

# x



# ~ m 

# z

**~** N 

# 0 N 

# Method 1 -Sampling and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources (Circular Stack) Distance- Far Wall to Outside of Port (in) Distance- Near Wall to Outside of Port (in) Inside Diameter of Stack (in) 

# 84.50 9.50 Port Length 

# 75.00

Port Diameter- For Ref. Only {in) 4.00 Distance to Upstream Disturbance (It) 

# Distance to Downstream Disturbance 

# (ft) Diameters Upstream Diameters Downstream Minimum Distance to Stack Wall (Default is 

# 1.0 inch) 

# 25.00 40.00



# 4.00 6.40 

# 1.00 Traverse Point Number 

# 1 

# 2 

# 3 4 5 

# 6 7 8 9 10 

# 11 12 Conversion Table for Decimal to Inch Fraction 

# 1116 1/8 3116 1/4 5/16 0.06 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 PROBE MARKINGS Decimal inches Nu.mber of Traverse Points on a Diameter


# 2 

# 4 6 

# 8 20.45 

# 14.53 12.80 

# 11.90 73.55 28.25 2045 17.38 65.75 31.70 24.05 79.48 62.30 33.73 73.55 60.28 81.20 69.95 76.63 82.10 10 11.45 15.65 20.45 

# 26.45 35.15 58.85 67.55 73.55 78.35 82.55 

# 318 0.38

12 11.08 14.53 18.35 22.78 28.25 36.20 57.80 65.75 71.23 75.65 79.48 82.93 0 

# c 

# , , r 0 

# , ( 

# > 0DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSION RATE CAlCULATION LOCATION: BORALBRICK SOURCE: DIFF Baghouse Outlet DATA Run#1 Run#2 Run 113 AVERAGE DATE 09/22110 09/22110 09122110 RUN TIME (min) 240.00 240.00 240.00 Dn (in) 0.289 0.289 0.289 An (ft2) 4.56E-04 4.56E-04 4.56E-04 AVG DH (in H20)
2.03 2.18 2.15 PATM (In Hg) 29.31 29.33 29.30 Pm(inHg)
29.46 29.49 29.46 Ps(GAUGE)

0.25 0.25 0.25 Ps(INHG}
29.33 29.35 29.32 Tm(F) 89.81 104.33 97.85 Tm(R} 549.50 564.02 557.54 Vm (ft3) 184.45 191.08 196.59 VmSTD(ftJ} 173.63 175.42 182.38 VLQ(ml) 184.30 221.60 214.50 VV STD (ft3} 8.69 10.45 10.12 VSTD (ft3) 182.32 185.87 192.49 %M 4.77 5.62 5.26 5.22 %SVP, 100.00 100.00 100.00 MD 0.952 0.944 0.947 MWD 29.03 29.02 29.03 M 28.50 28.40 28.45 Ts(F) 381.38 386.92 381.92 383.40 Ts(R) 841.07 846.61 841.61 843.09 SUMSQRTDP
31.04 31.64 31.57 NDP 48.00 48.00 48.00 AVGSQRTDP

0.65 0.66 0.66 CP 0.84 0.84 0.84 Vs (ft!s} 46.57 47.71 47.44 47.24 Ds (In) 75.00 75.00 75.00 As (ft2) 30.68 30.68 30.68 QS, FLOW, ACFM 85,732 87,824 87,333 86,963 Q STD (ft31mln) 52,756 53,727 53,688 53,390 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM 50,241 50,706 50,867 50,604 WT(gm} 2.32E-12 2.76E-12 3.66E-12 0.0000 %1 97.04 97.14 100.67 %C02
1.73 1.63 1.65 1.67 %02 18.86 19.05 19.05 18.99 %CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 %N2 79.41 79.33 79.30 0/F (lbslhr) 8.88E-11 1.06E-10 1.35E-10 0.000 DIF (kglhr) 4.03E-11 4.79E-i

1 6.13E-i1 0.0000 Production (!ph) 20.26 20.26 20.26 20.2600 Production (Mg) 9.19E-03 9.19E-03

9. 19E-03 9.19E-03 DIF (kg!Mg of Product} 2.5245E-13 3.003E-13 3.983E-13 3.17E·13 D!F (ng/dscm) 4.718E-04 5.556EHQ4 7.086E-04 5.79E-04 DIF {ngldscm@
7% 02] 3.22E-03 4.17E-03 5.32E-03 4.24E·03 QS, FLOW, ACMM 2428 2487

2473 2462 QS, FLOW, DSCMM
1423 1436 1440 1433 1 Theoretical amount of moisture that Ts can hold. lf **YcM>%SVP~** %SVP will be utilized
in calculations. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 203i::iUKAL l:H{It;KS ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATfi 09/22/10 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Outlet Run#1

**K~** 4.8526 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp
dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1

80 370 0.40 1.94 0.632 19.0
1.7 A1

80 370 0.40 1.94 0.632 A2

81 370 0.40 1.94 0.632 A2

81 372 0.40 1.94 0.632 A3

82 373 0.41 i.99 0.640 A3

83 374 0.41 1.99 0.640 A4

83 375 0.42 2.04 0.648 A4

84 376 0.42 2.04 0.648 A5

84 377 0.42 2.04 0.648 A5

85 378 0.42 2.04 0.648 A6

86 380 0.45 2.18 0.671 A6

86 380 0.45 2.18 0.671 A7

86 381 0.46 2.23 0.678 19.0
1.7 A7

87 381 0.46 2.23 0.678 A8

88 382 0.46 2.23 0.878 A8

88 383 0.46 2.23 0.678 A9

89 384 0.46 2.23 0.678 A9

89 385 0.46 2.23 0.678 A10

90 385 0.42 2.04 0.648 A10

90 384 0.42 2.04 0.648 A11

90 384 0.37 1.80 0.608 A11

90 364 0.37 1.80 0.608 A12

91 863 0.36 1.75 0.800 A12

91 383 0.36 1.75 0.800 81

91 390 0.41 1.99 0.640 18.9

1.7 81

91 389 0.41 1.99 0.640 82

92 389 0.43 2.09 0.656 82

92 389 0.43 2.09 0.656 83

92 388 0.44 2.14 0.863 83

92 388 0.44 2.14 0.863 84

92 389 0.46 2.23 0.878 84

93 389 0.46 2.23 0.878 85

93 389 0.47 2.28 0.686 85

93 385 0.47 2.28 0.686 86

93 385 0.47 2.28 0.686 86

93 385 0.47 2.28 0.686 87

64 383 0.41 1.99 0.640 18.9

1.8 87

94 383 0.41 1.99 0.640 88

94 383 0.40 1.94 0.632 88

94 382 0.40 1.94 0.632 89

95 382 0.40 1.94 0.832 89

95 382 0.40 1.94 0.832 810

95 381 0.39 1.89 0.624 810

95 381 0.39 1.89 0.624 811

98 375 0.37 1.80 0.608 811

96 375 0.37 1.80 0.608 812

96 375 0.37 1.80 0.608 812

96 375 0.37 1.80 0.608 89.81 381.38 0.42 2.03 31.037 18.95 1.73 corrected per 7 e--sb 18.86 Vm(ft3) Initial 26.14

% N2 (BY DIFFER£NCE}
79.41 Final 210.59 Total 184.45 %Excess Air 895.83 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 204ISOKINET!C DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09122110 SOURCE DIFF Baghouse Ou!let Run#2

K= 5.0114 POINT#

Tm
Ts
dp
dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1

98 385 0.38 1.90 0.616
19.1
1.6 A1

98 385 0.38 1.90 0.616 A2

99 385 0.39 1.95 0.624 A2
100 385 0.39 1.95 0.624 A3
100 385 0.42 2.10 0.648 A3
100 385 0.42 2.10 0.648 A4

101 386 0.42 2.10 0.648 A4

101 386 0.42 2.10 0.648 AS

102 386 0.42 2.10 0.648 A5
102 387 0.42 2.10 0.648 AS
102 387 0.45 2.26 0.671 A6
103 387 0.45 2.26 0.671 A7
104 389 0.47 2.36 0.686
19.1
1.5 A7
104 390 0.47 2.36 0.666 A8
104 391 0.50 2.51 0.707 A8
104 391 0.50 2.51 0.707 A9
104 390 0.45 2.26 0.671 A9
104 390 0.45 2.26 0.671 A10
105 388 0.42 2.10 0.648 A10
105 388 0.42 2.10 0.648 A11

105 388 0.39 1.95 0.624 A11

105 384 0.39 1.95 0.624 A12
105 384 0.39 1.95 0.624 A12

105 382 0.39 1.95 0.624 81
105 390 0.40 2.00 0.632
19.0
1.7 81
105 391 0.40 2.00 0.632 82
105 391 0.40 2.00 0.632 82
105 392 0.40 2.00 0.632 83
105 392 0.41 2.05 0.640 83
106 394 0.41 2.05 0.640 84
106 394 0.45 2.26 0.671 84
106 392 0.45 2.26 0.671 85
106 391 0.48 2.41 0.693 85
106 390 0.48 2.41 0.693 86
106 389 0.50 2.51 0.707 86
106 385 0.50 2.51 0.707 87
106 387 0.49 2.46 0.700
19.0
1.7 87

106 387 0.49 2.46 0.700 88
106 387 0.49 2.46 0.700 88

107 385 0.49 2.46 0.700 89
107 385 0.46 2.31 0.678 89
107 385 0.46 2.31 0.678 810

107 382 0.44 2,21 0.663 810

107 382 0.44 2.21 0.663 811

107 380 0.44 2.21 0.663 811

107 379 0.44 2.21 0.663 812

107 379 0.39 1.95 0.624 812

107 379 0.39 1.95 0.624 104.33 386.92 0.44 2.18 31.644 19.05 1.63 corrected per 7eu5b 19.05 Vm(ft3) Initial 211.25

% NZ (BY DIFFERENCE)
79.33 Final 402.33 Total 191.08 %Excess Air 1006.98 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 205!SOKINETIG DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATe 09122/10. SOURCe DIFF Baghouse Outlet Run#3

K= 4.9568 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp
dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1

101 387 0.38 1.88 0.616 18.9
1.7 A1

101 387 0.38 1.88 0.616 A2

101 387 0.38 1.88 0.616 A2

101 386 0.38 1.88 0.616 A3

101 386 0.41 2.03 0.640 A3
100 386 0.41 2.03 0.640 A4
100 385 0.41 2.03 0.640 A4
100 385 0.41 2.03 0.640 A5

101 388 0.43 2.13 0.656 A5

101 388 0.43 2.13 0.656 A6
100 387 0.46 2.28 0.678 A6
100 389 0.46 2.28 0.678 A7
100 384 0.48 2.38 0.693 19.0
1.7 A7
100 384 0.48 2.38 0.693 AB

99 384 0.48 2.38 0.693 AB

99 383 0.48 2.38 0.693 A9

99 383 0.46 2.28 0.678 A9

99 382 0.46 2.28 0.678 MO

99 379 0.43 2.13 0.656 MIJ

98 379 0.43 2.13 0.656 A11

98 379 0.44 2.18 0.663 A11

98 374 0.44 2.18 0.863 A12

98 374 0.37 1.83 0.608 A12

98 373 0.37 1.83 0.608 81

98 385 0.40 1.98 0.632
19.2
1.6 81

98 385 0.40 1.98 0.632 82

97 384 0.39 1.93 0.624 82

97 384 0.39 1.93 0.624 83

97 384 0.39 1.93 0.624 83

97 386 0.39 1.93 0.624 84

97 386 0.44 2.18 0.663 84

97 382 0.44 2.18 0.663 85

96 382 0.47 2.33 0.686 85

96 383 0.47 2.33 0.686 86

96 381 0.50 2.48 0.707 86

96 381 0.50 2.48 0.707 87

96 381 0.46 2.28 0.678
19.1
1.6 87

96 381 0.46 2.28 0.678 86

96 380 0.47 2.33 0.686 88

96 376 0.47 2.33 0.686 89

96 376 0.46 2.28 0.678 89

95 378 0.46 2.28 0.678 810

95 379 0.46 2.28 0.678 810

95 380 0.46 2.28 0.678 811

95 375 0.44 2.18 0.663 811

95 375 0.44 2.18 0.663 812

94 375 0.39 1.93 0.624 812

94 374 0.39 1.93 0.624 97,85 381.92 0.43 2.15 31,568 19.05 1.85 corrected per **7e~5b** 19.05 Vm(ft3) Initial 403.43

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCe)
79.30 Final 600.02 Total 198.59 %Excess Air 1010.50 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5. SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 206ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE CALCULATION The following equation establishes the relationship between the velocity head pressure differential and the desired critical orifice pressure drop. f.JI=Kx!Y..p The constant,

K, is determined

by f.JI =[846.72xDn

4 x!':l.H@ xc
2 (1-B

) 2 x MdT,,P., JxAp a

p
ws M TP

. s s 117 BORALBRICK Modu/e/D Dn dH@ Y, gamma factor Cp Bw(FRACTION,NOT%}

Md Pbar PS(GAUGE)
Ps Tm,F Tm,R Ms Ts,F Ts,R Pm K Terminology 9/2212010 Run#1 Run #2 Run#3 ATC4 ATC4 ATC4 0.289 0.289 0.289 1.951 1.951 1.951 0.995 0.995 0.995 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.05 0.05 0.05 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.31 29.33 29.30 0.25 0.25 0.25 29.33 29.35 29.32 90 105 100 549.69 564.69 559.69 28.45 28.45
28.45 385 380 380 844.69 839.69 839.69 29.42 29.46 29.49 4.8526 5.0114 4.9568 Ms=APPARENT STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT =Md(1·Bw)+18Bw Md=DRY GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT (29) OR =(0.44'%C02)+(0.32'%02)+(0.28.(%N2+%CO)) Ps GAUGE=STACK STATIC PRESSURE (IN. H20) Ps=ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE (IN. Hg) Pm=METER ABSOLUTE PRESSURE (IN. Hg) = Pbar
+ (avg dH/13.6) 'The method

5 sampling train is intended
to operate at a sampling rate of 0.75 cfm of dry air at 68 oF and 29.92 in. Hg. The orifice meter pressure differential that would produce such
a sampling rate through the orifice
is designated
as LIH@. _The **thef'.!ffi!l!£.~i nozz~~**  **c~aif'&iation**

is .Q.QtionaL

If the tester feels comfortable choosing the nozzle size through other means (experience, prior testing, etc.), this is also acceptable.
On (theoretical)

is calculated
on the assumption that a 0.75 cfm flowrate

is achieved

at 68 'F and 29.92 in. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

Hg. EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 207SAMPLECALCULATIONSBORALBR!CKSalisbury,NCRun#11}ABSOLUTEPRESSUREINDRYGASMETERPm=PATM+AVGDH/13.6PATMAvg.DH29.312.032iABSOLUTESTACKPRESSUREPs=PATM+Ps{GAUGE}/13.6PATMPs(GAUGE)29.310.25Pm29-.46Ps29.333)SAMPLEVOLUMEATSTANDARDCONDITIONSVMSTD•(VM)'(Y)'(TSTDITM)"(PMIPSTD)VmTmyVmSTDTSTD=PSTO=184.45549.500.99517:3.63ft34)VOlUMEOFWATERCOLLECTED,CORRECTEDTOStANDARDCONDITIONSWSTD•WSTDw+WST!JsgWSTOw•(002673)"(\/l_Qw)"(TSTOlPSTD)WSTDsg•(.002668)'\/LQsg)"(TSTOlPSTD)WHERE0.002673=0.04707FT3/Ml'"IN.HG/17.64DEG.RWHERE0.002668=0.04715FT3/G"IN.HGI17.64DEG.R.VLQ(w)167.00\/l_Q(sg)17.30WSTD8.69S)TOTALSAMPLEVOLUMEATSTANDARDCONDITIONSVSTD=VmSTO+WSTD=182.32ft36)PERCENTMOISTURElNSTACKGAS%M=(100)*{WSTD}NSTD=4.77%1)MOLEFRACTIONOFDRYGASMD"'{100-%M}/100"'0.952528DEGR29.92IN.HGATCPROJECTNo.P-10142EPAICREMISSIONTESTPROJECTAUGUSTAPLANTS4 &5,SALISBURYPLANT6SEPTEMBER2010APPENDIXPAGENo.208SAMPLE CALCULATIONS (continued) BORALBRICK Salisbury, NC Run#1 8) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE DRY GAS MWD"" (%C02"0.44)+(02*0.32}+((%CO+%N2t0.2B) %C02 %02 %CO 1.7 18.9

0.0 9) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE WET GAS M = (MWD)"(MD)

+ 18(1-MD)
=
%N2 79A WHERE
18 =MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF WATER, GiG-MOLE 10) STACK VELOCITY VS = **(8S.49)'(CPt((TSI(PS)(M))~112'((SUM**

SQRT DP)IN OP)) where 85.49

:o. **ftfsec~** [!b/lb-mole"lo.Hg)J(deg_

R*in H20)]"0.5 CP 0.84

Ts (R) 841.07 SUM SORT 31.04 11} STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE QS = (60)WS)'(AS) AS (!nlet) 30.68

NDP 48 QS 85,732 MWD 29.03 28.50 VS 4G.57 12) STACK VOLUMETRIC F!...,OW RATE, STANDARD CONDITIONS INCLUDING MOtSTURE Q SiD=
Q STD DRY !MD

52,756 13) STACK VOLUME FLOW RATE STANDARD CONDITIONS DRY Q STD DRY= 17.64r60"Md"Vs"A*(Psfrs{R))

= 50,241 14) POLLUTANT MASS RATE, CONCENTRATION BASIS PMRC
= (.1323)'(WT)'(Q STD)N STD WHERE 0.1323 "='COMBINED CONVERSION FACTOR (60 M!N/Hf\"0.00220 LBSJGRAM) WT(GRAMS) 0.0000 15) PERCENT ISOKINETIC

PMRC 0.000 %1 = **(0.09450"Ts~vm std)/(Ps~vs~An~Time"Md}**  Run Time Area of Ncu!e

%1 240 4.58E-04 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

97.04 EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 209OVI'V"\L On.l\..11"'\,::1 ANAL YT!CAL TESTING CONSULT ANTS, INC. Initial Source Survey Test Date 09123110 Company BORAL BRICK Address City, State Salisbury, NC Process Tested Dryer Specific Source Dryer Air Pollution Controls Test Methods US EPA M 23 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 210DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSION RATE CALCULATIONS LOCATION: BORALBRICK SOURCE: Dryer DATA Run#1 Run#2 Run #3 AV£RAGE DAT£ 09123/10 09/23/10 09/23/10 RUN TIME (min} 240.00 240.00 240.00 Dn (in) 0.237 0.237 0.237 An (ftZ) 3.06E-04 3.06E·04 3.06E·04 AVG DH (In H20}
1.58 1.65 1.66 PATM (in Hg) 29.32 29.36 29.40 Pm (In lfg} 29.44 29.48 29.52 Ps(GAUGE)

0.16 0.16 0.16 Ps(/NHG) 29.33 29.37 29.41 Tm(F) 76.75 94.77 102.58 Tm(R) 536.44 554.46 562.27 Vm (ft3) 173.44 176.04 177.72 vm sro (ftJJ 161.74 159.07 158.58 VLQ(ml) 128.20 131.00 136.10 WSTD(ft3}

6.05 6.18 6.42 VSTD(ft3) 167.79 165.24 165.00 %M 3.60 3.74 3.89 3.74 %SVPJ 12.74 12.94 13.22 MD 0.964 0.963 0.961 MWD 28.84 28.84. 28.84 M 28.45 28.43 28.41 Ts(F) 122.98 123.60 124.44 123.67 Ts(R) 582.67 583.29 584.13 583.36 SUMSQRTDP
33.96 34.26 34.23 NDP 48.00 48.00 48.00 AVGSQRTDP

0.71 0.71
0.71 CP 0.84 0.84 0.84 Vs (ftls) 42.46 42.84

42.81 42.70 Ds(ln}

51 X39

51 X 39

51 X 39 As (f!2} 13.81 13.81

13.81 CIS, FLOW, ACFM 35,192 35,500 35,479 35,390 Q STD (ft3/m/n) 31,263 31.546 31,525 31,445 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM 30.136 30,367 30,299 30,267 WT(gm} 9.00E-14 4.92E-14 2.03E·13 0.0000 %1 100.88 98.46 98.38 %C02
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %02 20.90 20.90 20.90 20.90 \/

%CO 0.00 0.00 0.00 j/0

q,.l...
%N2 79.10 79.10 79.10 DIF (lbslhr) 2.22E-12 1.24E·12 5.13E·12 2.86E·12 ( \. DIF(kglhl) 1.01E-12 5.64E-13 2.33E·12 1.30E-12 '\'

/ Producnon (tph) 20.26 20.26 20.26 2.03E+01 I Production (Mg) 9.19E-03 9.19E-03 9.19E-03 9.19E.03 {J

DIF (kg!Mg of Product) 9.7935E·15 5.354E-15 2.209E-14 1.24E-14 **~·**

DIF (ng!dscm) 1.965E-05 1.092E-05 4.520E-05 2.53E-05 **~~** \t
DIF (ngldscm@
7% 02} #DIV/0! #OIV/0! #OIV/0! #DIV/01 QS, FLOW, ACMM

996 1005 1005 1002 QS, FLOW, DSCMM

853
860
858 857 **~** 1\Q

1 Theoretical amount cf moisture that T.s can hold. %

**Jfo/~>%SVP**

**1** %SVP wm be utilized
In calculatfons. 1'-y Q\.

' t· ']! ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT APPENDIX PAGE No. 211 AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS ·DATE 09/23110 SOURCE Dryer Run#1 POINT#

Tm A1

69 M

69 A2

70 A2

70 A3

70 A3

70 A4

70 A4

70 A5

71 As

71 A6

72 A6

72 81

73 81

74 82

74 82

74 83

74 83

75 84

75 84

76 B5

76 B5

77 B6

77 B6

77 C1

78 C1

78 C2

79 C2

79 C3

80 C3

80 C4

80 C4

80 C5

80 C5

81 C6

81 CB

81 D1

81 D1

81 02

81 02

82 03

82 D3

82 04

82 D4

82 D5

82 D5

82 D6

82 D6

82 76.75 Vm(ft3) ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

**K~** 3.1432 Ts
dp dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 123 0.51 1.60 0.714 20.9
0.0 123 0.51 1.60 0.714 123 0.43 1.35 0.656 123 0.43 1.35 0.656 122 0.47 1.48 0.686 122 0.47 1.48 0.686 122 0.49 1.54 0.700 123 0.49 1.54 0.700 123 0.53 1.67 0.728 123 0.53 1.67 0.728 123 0.57 1.79 0.755 123 0.57 1.79 0.755 123 0.50 1.57 0.707 123 0.50 1.57 0.707 123 0.44 1.38 0.663 123 0.44 1.38 0.663 123 0.49 1.54 0.700 122 0.49 1.54 0.700 123 0.50 1.57 0.707 124 0.50 1.57 0.707 124 0.52 1.63 0.721 124 0.52 1.63 0.721 123 0.54 1.70 0.735 123 0.54 1.70 0.735 123 0.49 1.54 0.700 123 0.49 1.54 0.700 123 0.45 1.41 0.671 122 0.45 1.41 0.671 122 0.45 1.41 0.671 123 0.45 1.41 0.671 124 0.50 1.57 0.707 124 0.50 1.57 0.707 124 0.55 1.73 0.742 123 0.55 1.73 0.742 123 0.58 1.82 0.762 123 0.58 1.82 0.762 123 0.48 1.51 0.693 123 0.48 1.51 0.693 123 0.48 1.51 0.693 123 0.48 1.51 0.693 123 0.43 1.35 0.656 123 0.43 1.35 0.656 122 0.50 1.57 0.707 123 0.50 1.57 0.707 123 0.57 1.79 0.755 123 0.57 1.79 0.755 123 0.57 1.79 0.755 123 0.57 1.79 0.755 122.98 0.50 1.58 33.965 20.90 0.00 corrected per **7e~5b** 20.90 lnit!a! 467.99

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)
79.10 Final 641.43 Total 173.44 %Excess Air EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 ·118750.00 APPENDIX PAGE No. 212ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09123/10 SOURCE Dryer Run#2 POINT#

Tm A1

85 A1

87 A2

88 A2

89 A3

90 A3

90 A4

90 A4

91 AS

91 A5

91 A6

91 A6

92 81

92 81

93 82

94 82

94 B3

94 83

94 84

94 B4

95 BS

95 B5

95 86

95 86

95 C1

95 C1

96 cz

96 C2

96 C3

97 C3

97 C4

98 C4

98 C5

98 C5

98 co

98 C6

98 01

98 01

98 D2

98 02

98 03

98 D3

99 D4

99 D4

98 D5

98 D5

98 06

98 D6

99 94.77 Vm(ft3} ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

K= 3.2343 Ts
dp
dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 124 0.50 1.62 0.707 20.9
0.0 124 0.50 1.62 0.707 124 0.44 1.42 0.663 124 0.44 1.42 0.663 124 0.49 1.58 0.700 124 0.49 1.58 0.700 123 0.49 1.58 0.700 123 0.49 1.58 0.700 123 0.55 1.78 0.742 123 0.55 1.78 0.742 123 0.56 1.81 0.748 122 0.56 1.81 0.748 124 0.53 1.71 0.728 124 0.53 1.71 0.728 122 0.42 1.36 0.648 122 0.42 1.36 0.648 123 0.48 1.55 0.693 123 0.48 1.55 0.693 123 0.49 1.56 0.700 123 0.49 1.58 0.700 124 0.54 1.75 0.735 125 0.54 1.75 0.735 125 0.54 1.75 0.735 125 0.54 1.75 0.736 124 0.50 1.62 0.707 124 0.50 1.62 0.707 124 0.50 1.62 0.707 124 0.50 1.62 0.707 123 0.47 1.52 0.686 123 0.47 1.52 0.686 123 0.51 1.65 0.714 123 0.51 1.65 0.714 123 0.57 1.84 0.755 123 0.57 1.84 0.755 123 0.60 1.94 0.775 124 0.60 1.94 0.775 124 0.50 1.62 0.707 124 0.50 1.62 0.707 124 0.49 1.58 0.700 125 0.49 1.58 0.700 125 0.43 1.39 0.656 125 0.43 1.39 0.656 124 0.51 1.65 0.714 124 0.51 1.65 0.714 125 0.56 1.81 0.748 124 0.56 1.81 0.748 122 0.58 1.88 0.762 122 0.58 1.88 0.762 123.60 0.51 1.65 34.259 20.90 0.00 corrected per 7e.-5b 20.90 Initial 642.37

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)
79.10 Final 818.41 Total 178.04 %Excess Air EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 -11875().00 APPENDIX PAGE No. 213ISOKINETIC DATA AND CALCULATIONS DATE 09/23110. SOURCE Dryer Run#3

K= 3.2629 POINT#

Tm

Ts
dp
dH SQRTDP %02 %C02 A1
104 125 0.49 1.60 0.700 20.9
0.0 A1
104 125 0.49 1.60 0.700 A2
104 124 0.49 1.60 0.700 A2
104 124 0.49 1.60 0.700 A3
104 124 0.52 1.70 0.721 A3
105 124 0.52 1.70 0.721 A4
105 124 0.53 1.73 0.728 A4
105 124 0.53 1.73 0.728 AS
105 123 0.56 1.83 0.748 AS
105 123 0.56 1.83 0.748 A6
105 123 0.56 1.83 0.748 A6
105 122 0.56 1.83 0.748 81
104 125 0.52 1.70 0.721 B1
104 126 0.52 1.70 0.721 B2
104 126 0.45 1.47 0.671 B2
104 126 0.45 1.47 0.671 83
104 125 0.46 1.50 0.678 B3
104 125 0.46 1.50 0.678 B4
104 125 0.47 1.53 0.686 B4
104 124 0.47 1.53 0.686 BS
104 124 0.53 1.73 0.728 B5
103 123 0.53 1.73 0.728 B6
103 123 0.54 1.76 0.735 B6
103 123 0.54 1.76 0.735 C1
103 125 0.49 1.60 0.700 C1
103 125 0.49 1.60 0.700 C2
103 124 0.51 1.66 0.714 C2
103 124 0.51 1.66 0.714 C3
103 126 0.51 1.66 0.714 C3
102 126 0.51 1.66 0.714 C4
102 126 0.41l 1.57 0.693 C4
102 127 0.48 1.57 0.693 C5
102 126 0.55 1.79 0.742 C5

101 125 0.55 1.79 0.742 C6

101 124 0.56 1.83 0.748 C6

101 124 0.56 1,83 0.748 01
100 126 0.50 1.63 0.707 01
100 126 0.50 1.63 0.707 D2
100 125 0.48 1.57 0.693 02
100 125 0.48 1.57 0.693 03
100 125 0.48 1.57 0.693. DJ
100 124 0.48 1.57 0.693 04
100 124 0.43 1.40 0.656 04
100 124 0.43 1.40 0.656 05
100 123 0.54 1.76 0.735 D5
100 123 0.54 1.76 0.735 D6

99 123 0.57 1.86 0.755 06

99 123 0.57 1.86 0.755 102.58 124.44 0.51 1.66 34.228 20.90 0.00 corrected per 7e--5b 20.90 Vm(ft3} Initial 818.52

% N2 (BY DIFFERENCE)
79.10 Fin a! 996.24 Total 177.72 %Excess Air -118750.00 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 214MOISTURE DATA Dryer 912312010 Run#1 1sttmp. 2nd Imp. BEGINNING

100
100 ENDING

220
100 NET
120

0 Run#2 1stlmp. 2nd Imp. BEGINNING

100 100 ENDING

218
103 NET
118

3 Run#3 1stlmp. 2nd Imp. BEGINNING

100
100 ENDING

227
100 NET
127

0 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS 4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010

3rd Imp. 4/h Imp. TOTALS 0 300.0 0 308.2 0 8.2 128.2 3rd Imp. 4th Imp. TOTALS 0 300.0 0 310.0 0 10.0 131.0 3rd Imp. 4th Imp. TOTALS 0 300.0 0 309.1 0 9.1 136.1 APPENDIX PAGE No. 215!SOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE CALCULATION The following equation establishes the relationship between the velocity head pressure differential and the desired critical orifice pressure drop. f:H=KxAp The constant,

K, is determined

by 1'1H=[846.72xD

4 xi'1H xc
2 (1-B **xMd~nP.JxL'\.n** "

@
P
ws M TP

:rs s m Modu/e/D On dH@ Y, gamma factor Cp Bw(FRACT/ON,NOT"/o)

Md Pbar PS(GAUGE) Ps Terminology Tm,F Tm,R Ms Ts,F Ts,R Pm K BORALBRICK 9/23/2010 Run#1 ATC3 0.237 1.937 0.963 0.84 0.04 29.0 29.32 0.16 29.33 80 539.69 28.56 125 584.69 29.43 3.1432 Run #2 ATC
3 0.237 1.937 0.963 0.84 0.04 29.0 29.36 0.16 29.37 95 554.69 28.56 125 584.69 29.44 3.2343 Run #3 ATC3 0.237 1.937 0.963 0.84 0.04 29.0 29.40 0.16 29.41 100 559.69 28.56 125 584.69 29.48 3.2629 Ms=APPARENT STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT **~Mct(1-Bw)+18Bw Md~DRY**  GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT (29) OR =(0.44.%C02)+(0.32*%02)+(0.28.(%N2+%CO)) Ps GAUGE=STACK STATIC PRESSURE (IN. H20) Ps=ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE (IN. Hg) Pm=METER ABSOLUTE PRESSURE (IN. Hg) = Pbar + (avg dH/13.6) 'The method

5 sampling train is intended
to operate at a sampling rate of 0.75 elm of dry air at 68 oF and 29.92 in. Hg. The orifice meter pressure differential that would produce such
a sampling rate through the onfice
is designated

as IIH@. _The ih§wretlcal nozzle cafcuiat.ion

is option_ai._

lf the tester feels comfortable choosing the nozzle size through other means (experience, prior testing, etc.), this is also acceptable.
On (theoretical)

is calculated
an the assumption that a 0.75 elm llowrate

is achieved
at 68 'F and 29.92 in. Hg. ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 216SAMPLE CALCULATIONS BORAL BRICK Salisbury, NC Run#1 1) ABSOLUTE PRESSURE

IN DRY GAS METER Pm
• PATM +AVG DH/13.6 PATM Avg. DH 29.32 1.58 2) ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE Ps = P ATM
+ Ps(GAUGE)/13.6 PATM Ps(GAUGE) 29.32 0.16
Pm 29.44 Ps 29.33 3} SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS VM STO

• (VM)"(Y)'(T STOITM)"(PMIP STD) Vm
Tm

y VmSTD 173.44 536.44 0.963 161.74 TSTD= PSTD= ff3 4) VOLUME OF WATER COLLECTED, CORRECTED
TO STANDARD CONDITIONS W STD = W STOw+ WSTDsg W STOw •(.002673)'(VLQw)'(T STOlP STD) W STDsg
= (.002668)'1/LQsg)'(T STOlP STD) WHERE 0.002673

• 0.04707 FT3/ML'IN. HG/17.64 DEG. R. WHEHE 0.002688

= 0.04715 FT3/G'IN.HGI17.64 DEG. R. VLQ (w) 120.00 VLQ (sg) 8.20 WSTD 6.05
ft3 5} TOTAL SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD CONDITIONS VSTD= Vm STD+ WSTD=

1$7.79 ft3 6) PERCENT MOISTURE

IN STACK GAS %M = (100)'(VV STD)N STD = 3.SO% 7) MOLE FRACTION OF DRY GAS MD= (100-o/oM)/100"'

0.964

528 DEG R. 2$.92 IN. HG ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS

4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 217SAMPLE CALCULATIONS (continued) BORALBRICK Salisbury, NC Run#1 8) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE DRY GAS MWO

= r'loC02"'0.44)+(02''0.32}+((%CO+%N2)"'0.28) %C02 %02 %CO 0.0 20.9

0.0 9) MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF THE WET GAS M • (MWD)'(MO)

+ 18(1-MD)

=
%N2 79.1 WHERE 18 =MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF WATER, GIG-MOLE 10) STACK VELOCITY VS = (85.49)'(CP)'((TSI{PS)(M))'112'((SUM

SQRT DP)IN DP)) where 85.49 = ftlsec" [lh/1b-mole""in.Hg)/(deg.

Win t-120)1"'0.5 CP 0.84 Ts(R) 582.67 SUMSQRT 33.96 11} STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE QS = (60)"(VS)'(AS) AS (inlet) 13.81

NDP 48 OS 35,192. MWD 28.84 28.45
vs 42..46 12) STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, STANDARD CONDITIONS !MCLUD!NG MOISTURE Q STD = Q STD DRY/MD

31,263 13) STACK VOLUME FLOW RATE STANDARD CONDITIONS DRY Q STD DRY= 17.647'60"Md"Vs'A'(Ps1Ts(R))

= 30,136 14) POLLUTANT MASS RATE, CONCENTRATION BASIS PMRC

= (.1323)'{WT)'(Q STD)N STD WHERE 0.1323

• COMBINED CONVERSION FACTOR (60 MIN/HR'0.00220 LBSIGRAM) WT(GRAMS) 0.0000 15) PERCENT !SOKINET!C

PMRC 0.000 %1 = **{0.09450*Ts~vm** std)/(Ps"Vs"Att"Time"Md) Run Time Area of Nozzle

%1 100.88 240 3.06E-04 ATC PROJECT No. P-10142

EPA ICR EMISSION TEST PROJECT AUGUSTA PLANTS 4 & 5, SALISBURY PLANT

6 SEPTEMBER 2010 APPENDIX PAGE No. 218