alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(October 20, 1964)

#### Ethel Holcomb et al., Appellants, v. John A. Wincuinas, Doing Business as John’s 5¢ to $1.00 Store, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Washington County, granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing appellants’ complaint on the merits. Appellant [Ethel Holcomb] seeks to recover for personal injuries suffered when on June 1, 1962 she fell on the sidewalk in front of respondent’s business premises. Liability is predicated on an ordinance passed by the Village of Granville making an abutting property owner liable in tort by reason of his omission, failure or negligence in constructing, maintaining or properly repairing a sidewalk abutting his premises. The sole issue here is the constitutionality of the enactment of this ordinance. It is conceded that prior to November 5, 1963 the Village of Granville, having a population of under 5,000 had no authority to enact such an ordinance unless such authority is found in the Village Law, specifically sections 89 and 90 (cf. *Willis*v. *Parker,*225 N. Y. 159; *Karom*v. *Altarac,*3 A D 2d 925). We agree with the court below that the Village Law does not grant the right to enact such an ordinance. A reading of the pertinent sections of the Village Law and the legislative and judicial history of these sections does not portend such a construction (see *Willis*v. *Parker, supra; Karom*v. *Altarac, supra;*Purpose and Scope of Municipal Home Rule Law, Governor’s Memorandum of Approval — Municipal Home Rule Law; 4 Op. St. Comp., 1948, pp. 300-301). Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, J. P., Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
89–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–516 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE 

COMMITTEE ON RULES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

JUNE 29, 2010.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1487] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1487, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The resolution applies the waiver to any resolution reported from the Rules Committee through the legislative day 

of July 3, 2010, providing for consideration or disposition of any of 

the following: (1) A conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 

4173) to provide for financial regulatory reform, to protect consumers and investors, to enhance Federal understanding of insurance issues, to regulate the over-the-counter derivatives markets, 

and for other purposes. (2) A measure that includes a subject matter addressed by H.R. 4213 or any amendment pertaining thereto. 

The resolution authorizes the Speaker to entertain motions that 

the House suspend the rules at any time through the legislative 

day of July 3, 2010. The Speaker or her designee shall consult with 

the Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution. Finally, the resolution provides that it shall be in order without intervention of any 

point of order to consider concurrent resolutions providing for adjournment during the month of July. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with HEARINGS
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Curriculum Review Tool      

# Curriculum Review Tool

Our Curriculum Review Tool helps you review and compare financial education curricula across four key dimensions, so you can select the most promising ones for your classroom.

https://www.consumerfinance.gov/f/201509_cfpb_youth-financialeducation-curriculum-review.pdf
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           PPRER000050      

# PPRER000050

St. Lawrence, J. S., Brasfield, T. L., Jefferson, K. W., Alleyne, E., O'Bannon, R. E., III,  Shirley, A. (1995). Cognitive-behavioral intervention to reduce African American adolescents' risk for HIV infection. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(2), 221-237.

HighRandom assignment study that met all criteria for a high rating; findings show a positive, statistically significant impact for at least one behavioral outcome

### Program Information

### Evaluation Setting

### Study Sample

### Research Design

### Study Findings
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10069 

To transfer certain unobligated funds to the Disaster Relief Fund, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 29, 2024 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, Mr. 

ROSENDALE, Mr. NORMAN, and Mr. OGLES) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To transfer certain unobligated funds to the Disaster Relief 

Fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS TO DIS4 ASTER RELIEF FUND. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any unobligated covered funds 

6 shall be transferred to the Disaster Relief Fund to carry 

7 out the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 

8 Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) with respect to 

9 major disasters declared under section 401 of the Robert 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 10069 IH

1 T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

2 (42 U.S.C. 5170). 

3 (b) COVERED FUNDS DEFINED.—In this section, the 

4 term ‘‘covered funds’’— 

5 (1) means funds made available under the 

6 heading ‘‘Bilateral Economic Assisstance—Funds 

7 Appropriated to the President—Economic Support 

8 Fund’’ of title IV of the Ukraine Security Supple9 mental Appropriations Act (Public Law 118–50); 

10 and 

11 (2) does not include such funds that are made 

12 available to prevent and respond to food insecurity. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3.501-1 Definition. *Buying-in* as used in this section, means submitting an offer below anticipated costs, expecting to— ( 1 ) Increase the contract amount after award (e.g., through unnecessary or excessively priced change orders); or
( 2 ) Receive follow-on contracts at artificially high prices to recover losses incurred on the buy-in contract.
[48 FR 42108, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 2127, Jan. 10, 2001]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Margarito ELIAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-20406

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2007.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Robert Jackson Herrington, Plano, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*459Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Margarito Elias (Elias) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Elias has been deported and has not filed a response to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfi’ivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, *see*5th Cir. R. 42.2, and in part as moot.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### 837.7000 Scope.

This subpart applies to mortuary (funeral and burial) services for beneficiaries of VA as provided in 38 U.S.C. 2302, 2303, and 2308 when it is determined that a contract would be the most efficient and effective method. Contract payment terms for use of the purchase card as a method of payment

[84 FR 46454, Sept. 4, 2019]
#### Otto B. Bensen, appellee, v. H. W. King, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,656.

Forcible entry and detainer. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Will county; the Hon. Frederick A. Hill, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1926.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 19, 1926.

Garnsey, Wood & Lennon, for appellant.

Snapp, Heise & Snapp, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Partlow

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### 52.246-25 Limitation of Liability—Services.

As prescribed in 46.805, insert the following clause:

# Limitation of Liability—Services (FEB 1997)

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) below, and except to the extent that the Contractor is expressly responsible under this contract for deficiencies in the services required to be performed under it (including any materials furnished in conjunction with those services), the Contractor shall not be liable for loss of or damage to property of the Government that (1) occurs after Government acceptance of services performed under this contract and (2) results from any defects or deficiencies in the services performed or materials furnished.

(b) The limitation of liability under paragraph (a) above shall not apply when a defect or deficiency in, or the Government's acceptance of, services performed or materials furnished results from willful misconduct or lack of good faith on the part of any of the Contractor's managerial personnel. The term *Contractor's managerial personnel,* as used in this clause, means the Contractor's directors, officers, and any of the Contractor's managers, superintendents, or equivalent representatives who have supervision or direction of—

(1) All or substantially all of the Contractor's business;

(2) All or substantially all of the Contractor's operations at any one plant, laboratory, or separate location at which the contract is being performed; or

(3) A separate and complete major industrial operation connected with the performance of this contract.

(c) If the Contractor carries insurance, or has established a reserve for self-insurance, covering liability for loss or damage suffered by the Government through the Contractor's performance of services or furnishing of materials under this contract, the Contractor shall be liable to the Government, to the extent of such insurance or reserve, for loss of or damage to property of the Government occurring after Government acceptance of, and resulting from any defects and deficiencies in, services performed or materials furnished under this contract.

(End of clause)

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34762, July 3, 1995; 61 FR 67426, Dec. 20, 1997]
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                           VERIZON WASHINGTON, DC INC.

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       Nine Months Ended
(Dollars in Thousands)                                 September 30, 2001
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Income before provision for income taxes................       $124,924
Equity in loss from affiliates..........................         12,206
Dividends received from equity affiliate................            110
Interest expense........................................         15,460
Portion of rent expense representing interest...........          2,880
Amortization of capitalized interest....................            802
                                                              -----------
Earnings, as adjusted...................................       $156,382
                                                              ===========

Fixed charges:
Interest expense........................................       $ 15,460
Portion of rent expense representing interest...........          2,880
Capitalized interest....................................          2,806
                                                              -----------
Fixed Charges...........................................       $ 21,146
                                                              ===========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges......................           7.40
                                                              ===========
</TABLE>
#### Walter Liese, trading as Liese Lumber Company et al., appellees, v. Barthel Hug, intervenor, appellant.

Bill to foreclose mechanic’s lien. Lien denied. Appeal by intervening claimant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. Louis Bernreuter, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1926.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Opinion filed July 9, 1926.

A. B. Ogle and A. B. Davis, for appellant.

L. N. Nick Perrin, Jr., for Walter Liese, appellee. Turner, Holder & Buffington, for John Howard Heiner and Elizabeth Heiner, appellees.

Mr. Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

182) ll-K- (F)-9 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:54 AM Sheet 182 of 325 
P.2 

M o* 7 

II-K-(F)-9 

1990 PROJECTED REGIONAL FOSSIL FUEL DEMAND BY INDUSTRY 

FOR NEW INDUSTRIAL BOILERS. 

Letter from E. Medine, EEA to M. Gevelber, DOE.FE. 

November 14, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(F)-9
Exhibit 15-B

[Letterhead of Deloitte & Touche LLP]

 Deloitte &
 Touche LLP
____________                      _________________________________________
                                  Suite 900        Telephone (313) 396-3000
                                  600 Renaissance Center
                                  Detroit, Michigan  48243-1704




INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

Shareholder and Board of Directors
Chrysler Financial Corporation
Southfield, Michigan

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Chrysler Financial Corporation (a subsidiary of Chrysler Corporation) and
consolidated subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, the related
condensed consolidated statements of net earnings, for the three months and
nine months ended September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the related condensed
consolidated statements of shareholders' interest and cash flows for the
nine moths ended September 30, 1998 and 1997. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial
and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Chrysler Financial Corporation
and consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of net earnings and cash flows for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated January 22, 1998, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1997 is fairly presented, in
all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from
which it has been derived.

/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP

October 8, 1998



_______________
Deloitte Touche
Tohmatsu
International  
_______________



<PAGE>







THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

IVAN DOMNIN,

Appellant,

v.

OKSANA DOMNINA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-2541

[January 26, 2023]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Davis, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

FMCE-21015969.

Andre G. Raiklhelson of Trayber Raikhelson Law Group, Boca Raton, 

for appellant.

Meaghan K. Marro of Marro Law, P.A., Plantation, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Darwein Cruz, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Ruth Santos, et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Defendant, and Bronx United in Leveraging Dollars, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[776 NYS2d 469]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered April 10, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, *395granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The 10-year-old plaintiff suffered personal injury when he was pushed into a hallway window while playing “tag.” Whatever the merit to the assertion that the window was improperly maintained and already broken, the playmate’s shove that propelled the infant plaintiff into the window constituted an unforeseeable intervening act, sufficiently attenuated from defendants’ conduct as to relieve them of liability *(Pena v Schur,*245 AD2d 206 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 811 [1998]; *see also Dantzler v New York City Hous. Auth.,*269 AD2d 420 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 710 [2001]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.