Page **1** of **25 9/17/2012**  **SUPPORTING STA**

**TEMENT FOR AN**  **INFORMA TION COLLECTION REQUEST (ICR)**  **1. Identification of the Information Collection**  **1(a). Title of the Information Collection** Title: **Standards for Pesticide Containers and Containment**  EPA ICR No. **1632 .0**  **4** OMB Control No. **2070 -** **0133 1(b). Short Characterization/A** **bstract** This Information Collection Request covers the information collection activities contained in the final Pesticide Contai ner and Containment Regulations. The final rule was published on August 16, 2006, with final amendments to the rule published on October 29, 2008. (See Attachments B and C.) The ICR for the Pesticide Container and Containment Regulations was approved by OMB on July 9, 2010. T he entities affected by the container regulations are different than the entities affected by the containment regulations, so this ICR document provides separate discussions of the primary activities and the related burden estimates. Wh ere necessary to distinguish the discussion of these two primary activities within each section of this ICR , the Agency has identified the discussion of the information collection activities associated with the container design and residue removal requirements with this header : “ **Container ,**  ” and the information collection activities related to the containment structure requirements with this header : “ **Containment** .” Wh ere the discussion applies equally to both sets of activities, there is no distinction. **1(b)(i). Container.** These portions of the ICR cover the information collection activities associated with the **container design and residue removal requirements**

. Specifically, the requirement that businesses su bject to the container regulations (pesticide registrants) and repackaging regulations (pesticide registrants and refillers and swimming pool supply companies ) maintain records of test data, cleaning procedures, certain data when a container is refilled an d other supporting information. These records are subject to both call

- in by EPA and on

-site inspection by EPA and its representatives. EPA has not established a regular schedule for the collection of these records, and there is no reporting. **1(b)(ii). Containment** 
**.** Th ese portion s of the ICR cover the information collection activities associated with the **containment structure requirements**

. Specifically, the requirement that businesses subject to the containment structure regulations maintain records of the: 1) monthly inspection and maintenance of each containment structure and all stationary bulk containers; 2) duration over which non

stationary bulk containers holding pesticide s and not protected by a secondary containment unit remain at the same location; and 3) construction date of the containment structure. The businesses subject to the containment structure regulations include agrichemical retailers and refilling establishme nts, custom blenders andPage **2** of **25**

commercial applicators of agricultural pesticides. The records have to be maintained by the owners and operators of such businesses. There is no regular schedule for the collection of either of these records, nor does EPA anticip ate a call

- in of records at some future date. Instead, the records would be available to inspectors to ensure that businesses are in compliance with containment requirements. These inspections are generally conducted by the states, which enforce FIFRA re gulations through cooperative agreements with EPA. **2. Need For and Use of the Collection**  **2(a). Need/A** **uthority for the Collection** The statutory authority for these collection activities are found in sections 3, 8, 19 and 25 of the Federal Insecticide , Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. 136f, 136q and 136w. See Attachment A. The 1988 amendments to FIFRA section 19 significantly expanded and strengthened EPA’s authority in the areas of pesticide storage, disposal and transportation and authorized the administrator, in conjunction with the registration and reregistration of a pesticide, to establish:

 data requirements to determine methods of safe storage and disposal of pesticides [FIFRA section 19(a)(1)(A)]; and

 labeling requirements for the storage, transportation and disposal of pesticides, excess pesticides, rinsates, and containers [FIFRA section 19(a)(1)(B)]

. Furthermore, section 19 mandates the issuance of regulations for:

 pesticide container design standards [FIFRA section 19 (e)]; and

 pesticide residue removal standards and procedures [FIFRA section 19(f)]

. The collection (record keeping) of information covered by this ICR is needed to ensure that EPA’s statutory requirement to develop regulations for pesticide container de sign and residue removal is implemented. Together with the requirements for containment of large pesticide tanks, the container requirements for design and residue removal are essential to ensure the safe use, reuse and refill of containers as required by FIFRA section 19. **2(a)(i ). Container.**  The container design and residue removal regulations are contained in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 156 and 165. The container design and residue removal standards are intended to protect human health during container handling, refilling, storage, use, reuse, disposal and recycling. The standards include design and construction requirements to ensure that contain ers are durable and that breakage and leakage will not occur during th ese operations. The standards adopt and refer to certain Department of Transportation (DOT) standards regarding container integrity and marking. There are alsoPage **3** of **25**

requirements to include specific instructions on labels regarding residue removal procedures, and specific procedures for refilling refillable containers for sale or distribution. The standards are also intended to promote recycling and the use of refillable containers so that the number of pesticide containers in the waste stream will be reduced. **2(a)(ii). Containment.** The containment structure regulations are contained in 40 CFR Part 165. The containment standards are intended to prevent pesticide contamination of soil, ground water and surface water at specified sites where pesticides are stored in refillable bulk containers and where container refilling operations occur. There are a number of potential sources of pesticide spills at refilling operations and bulk pesticide handling facilities ranging from small leaks to container failures . In many cases, environmental contamination may be caused by chronic small leaks of concentrated pesticides from containers and appurtenances (e.g., hoses, pipes, valves, pumps) and from improper management of container rinsates or equipment wash water. Larger releases occur less frequently but can result in significant environmental contamination. Major spills can result from bulk container failure, operator error and vandalism. Facilities are required to maintain specific records so that the Agency can verify compliance. **2(b). Practical Utility**  **/Users of the Data** EPA or its representative (i.e., the states) will use records that are required to be maintained to verify compliance with the regulations. Although records maintained under the regulations are subject to call

- in by EPA, the Agency does not expect to conduct routine call

- ins. Instead, the records will be reviewed during routine establishment inspections. These inspections are generally con ducted by the states, which enforce FIFRA regulations through cooperative agreements with EPA. **2(b)(i). Container.** EPA will use the records of test data and other information collected or submitted under the pesticide container design and residue rem oval regulations to assess compliance with the regulations and to evaluate their effectiveness. The data will be used by the Registration Division, the Antimicrobial Division, the Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division and the Field and External Affairs Division of OPP, as well as the Office of Compliance and the Office of Civil Enforcement in EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. The specific users within the divisions include chemists, economists, and product and project manage rs. The data may also be used by EPA Regions and state enforcement officials. **2(b)(ii). Containment**
**.** Records of the inspection and maintenance of containment structures and stationary bulk agricultural pesticide containers will assist EPA, states or political subdivisions duly designated by EPA to assess the integrity of bulk containers and containment structures. Records documenting the duration over which a pesticide remains in a bulkPage **4** of **25**

container not protected by secondary containment at the same lo cation will allow EPA or its representatives to determine whether the bulk container has exceeded the 30

- day residence criterion which triggers requirements for secondary containment of stationary bulk containers. Records of the construction date of the secondary containment structure will allow EPA or its representatives to determine whether the structure must comply with the standards for existing structures or for new structures (according to the definitions of existing and new in the final rule). **3. Non Duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria**  **3(a). Non duplication**  Duplication is not an issue because these records are generally unique to the requirements of the federal pesticide law (FIFRA) and to specific pesticide products. EPA is the primary Federal agency that regulates pesticide chemicals, pesticide containers and disposal. To the extent that companies may already retain these records as part of its management practices, any potential duplication will facilitate their compl iance with the regulation. Therefore, there is no duplication of effort. In addition, EPA maintains files on all pesticide chemicals, as well as correspondence and information/data submitted. These files are referenced to determine whether the necessary data are already on hand, thereby eliminating duplicative data requests. The list of data submitters that EPA publishes enables the industry to act cooperatively in the development and/or use of data. Further, EPA allows cost

-sharing agreements among m anufacturers of specific pesticide chemicals in order to minimize the duplication of laboratory tests conducted for this program. **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB**  Pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d), in proposing to renew this ICR, EPA is publishing a Federal Register Notice that provides a 60

- day public notice and comment period.
**3(c) Consultations**  During the development of this renewal ICR, EPA staff will contact appropriate stakeholders and ask them for their assessment of the regulatory burden estimates expressed by the Agency in this ICR. A summary of these consultations will be provided in the supporting statement during the second comment period.
**3(d). Effects of Less Frequent Collection**  Not applicable. There is no collection activity. Records are generated according to the schedule in the regulations, and , if necessary, information will be collected periodically without a set schedule for compliance assurance.Page **5** of **25**

**3(e). General Guidelines** The only g uideline established under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that may be exceeded in this collection is the time period for retaining records. The PRA guidelines specify that an agency must provide justification when requiring data other than health, medi cal or tax records be retained for more than three years. This is discussed separately for container and containment below. In addition, OMB’s regulations require agencies to provide a statement indicating whether the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and an explanation of the decision (5 CFR 1320.5(a)(iii)(E)). EPA is leaving the selection of an information storage method for the records to the regulated community. The records must be made available on request by EPA or its representatives, and may be stored by means of automated, electronic, mechanical or other forms of information technology. **3(e)(i). Container.** The following time periods for retaining records under th e container design and residue removal regulations exceed the three year only guideline for record retention established under the PRA: 1 ) f or nonrefillable containers, the registrant must maintain the required records for as long as the nonrefillable container is used with the pesticide product and for three years thereafter; 2 ) for refillable containers, each registrant who distributes or sells a pesticide product to a refiller for repackaging into refillable containers and each registrant who distributes or sells a pesticide product in refillable containers must maintain the required records for the current operating year and for three years thereafter; 3 ) for refillable containers, each refiller must maintain the required informational records for the current operating year and for three years thereafter. Information about actual repackaging must be recorded and kept for three years. EPA is requiring that the information described above be retained by registrants or refillers for more than three years so that risks presented by pesticide containers can be thoroughly evalua ted. Most container designs and many refillable containers are in use for more than three years. Further, even when a design is discontinued, containers of that design type may remain on the market for a number of years. Therefore, if EPA is to be able to thoroughly evaluate risks presented by pesticide containers it requires access to information on these containers designs and containers for as long as they remain in commerce. **3(e)(ii). Containment.** The only guideline established under the PRA that is exceeded is the time period for retaining records relating to the construction date of the secondary containment structure. The regulations require that records documenting the construction date of the containment structure be retained as long as the containment structure is in use, and for three years thereafter. EPA requires retention of records documenting the age of the containment facility because the standards for structuresPage **6** of **25**

built before promulgat ion of the containment rule differ slightly from the standards for structures built after promulgation of the rule. The two sets of standards apply to “existing” and “new” containment structures, terms which are defined in the rule. EPA is requiring that the records be retained for a period in excess of that proposed by PRA guidelines because containment structures are typically in use for much longer than three years. **3(f). Confidentiality** Trade secret or confidential business information (CBI) is frequently submitted to the EPA under the pesticide program because submissions usually include the manufacturing process, product formulation, and supporting data. Health and safety data submitted by registrants under FIFRA are considered by EPA to contai n no CBI. If, however, registrants submit CBI, such information is protected from disclosure under FIFRA Section 10. CBI data submitted to the EPA is handled strictly in accordance with the provisions of the FIFRA Confidential Busin ess Information Securi ty Manual

. Since EPA does not anticipate a collection or call

- in of the retained records covered by this ICR, the information in those records would not leave the possession of the affected businesses. **3(g). Sensitive Questions** Not applicable. No information of a sensitive or private nature is requested in this information collection activity. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested**  **4(a). Respondents/NA ICS Codes**  **4(a)(i). Container.** The regulated community affected by the container design and residue removal regulations i ncludes businesses that formulate pesticide products or repackage pesticide products into refillable pesticide containers. The affected businesses are pesticide registrants, classified as North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 325320

- Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing, NAICS code 422910

- Farm Suppli es Wh olesalers, and Swimming Pool Applicators, classified under 3 different NAICS codes shown in the table below. Category NAICS codes Examples of potentially affected entities Pesticide and other agricultural chemical manufacturing 325320 Pesticide registrants and businesses who formulate pesticide products or pesticide formulation intermediates. Farm Supply W holesalers 422910 All agricultural pesticide refillers whose principal business is retail sale of agricultural pesticides.Page **7** of **25**

Other services to buildings & dwellings All other miscellaneous store retailers (except tobacco stores) All other special trade contractors 561790

453998

235990 Swimming pool applicators.

**4(a)(ii). Containment.** The regulated community affected by the containment regulations includes facilities that utilize one or more stationary bulk agricultural pesticide containers, mobile bulk agricultural pesticide containers that remain in one location for at least 30 consec utive days, and containment pads for agrichemical pesticide dispensing areas. The majority of such facilities are classified in the farm supplies industry under one NAICS code, 422910

- Farm Supplies W holesalers. NAICS 422910 includes both farm supply dea lers and fertilizer dealers, (frequently referred to as agrichemical facilities or businesses), as well as other establishments engaged in the distribution of animal feeds, fertilizers, agricultural chemicals, pesticides, seeds and other farm supplies, except grains. Agricultural (aerial and ground) commercial applicators are also affected by the rule. Most of these industries are classified under NAICS 115112

- Soil Preparation, Planting and Cultivating. A number of agricultural services such as cultiva tion, pollination, detasseling of corn, hoeing, and pruning are included under this NAICS code.

Category NAICS codes Examples of potentially affected entities
Farm Supplies Wh olesalers 422910 All agricultural pesticide refillers whose principal business is retail sale of agricultural pesticides. Retail dealers that have bulk indoor or outdoor agricultural pesticide storage. Independent commercial applicators 115112 Businesses that apply pesticides for compensation (by aerial and/or ground application) and that are not affiliated with agrichemical dealers. **4(b). Information Requested 4(b)**  **(i)**
**. Data Items, Including Record Keeping Requirements**  **4(b)(i)(1). Container.** In order to comply with the container design and residue removal requirements, respondents must undertake a number of recordkeeping activities (see tables below) for as long as the product is used and for three years after that. There are no reporting req uirements for these regulations . However, the required records must be furnished and made available for inspection and copying upon request of EPA or its designee. In addition, registrants must inform EPA by notification of the label changes made to comp ly with the requirements of §156.Page **8** of **25**

**Recordkeeping Requirements for Nonrefillable and Refillable Containers**

Recordkeeping Nonrefillable Containers For as long as a nonrefillable container is used for the product and for 3 years

thereafter:
 The name and EPA registration number of the product.
 A description of the container(s) used to distribute or sell the product.
 Documentation of compliance with the closure requirement, if applicable.
 Documentation of compliance with the dispensing requirement, if applicable.
 Documentation of compliance with the residue removal requirement, if applicable. Repackaging (a) These “informational” records must be kept for the current operating year and for

three years after that (see the table below which identifies which businesses (registrants and/o r refillers) ) mu st comply:
 The written contract between the pesticide product’s registrant and the refiller for the pesticide product.
 The written refilling residue removal procedure for the pesticide product.
 The written description of acceptable containers for the pesticide product. (b) Each time a refiller repackages pe sticide product into a refillable container for distribution or sale, the following records must be generated and maintained for at least three years after the date of repackaging:
 The EPA registration number of the pesticide product distributed or sold in the refillable container.
 The date of the repackaging.
 The serial number or other identifying code of the refillable container. As shown in the following table, antimicrobial products used in swimming pools and closely

- related sites do not have to comply with these section (b) repackaging requirements. **Recordkeeping Requirements in the Repackaging Regulations** Product

- Specific Record Registrants who d/s

directly in refillables 1 Registrants who d/s to refillers for repackaging into refillables 1 Refille rs who aren’t registrants

Swim pool products 2 All other

products All products Swim pool products 2 All other

products Informational Records Contract to repackage No No Yes Yes Yes Refilling residue removal procedure Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Description of acceptable containers Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Repackaging Records EPA registration # d/s in the container No Yes No No Yes Date of the repackaging No Yes No No Yes Serial # of the container No Yes No No Yes (1) “d/s” = distribute or s ell . (2) Swim pool products = antimicrobial products used in swimming pools and closely related sites, that are subject to the pesticide container

- related regulations.Page **9** of **25**

Registrants may request waivers from or modifications to the nonrefillable container standards and to some of the refillable container standards. There are no forms associated with this record keeping. **4(b)(i)(2). Containment.** The following records must be maintained under the requirements of the containment regulations: (a) Records of inspection and maintenance for each containment structure and for each stationary bulk container and its appurtenances must be kept for 3 years and must include the following information:

(1) name of the person conducting the inspection or maintenance; (2) date t he inspection or maintenance was conducted; (3) conditions noted; (4) specific maintenance performed. (b) Records for any non

- stationary dry or liquid bulk container that holds pesticide but is not protected by a secondary containment unit meeting the regulations must be kept for 3 years. Records on non

stationary bulk containers must include the time period that the container remains at the same location. (c) Records of the construction date of the containment structure must be kept for as long a s the pesticide containment structure is in use, and for 3 years afterwards. There are no forms associated with this record keeping. **4(b) (ii)** 
**. Container Requirements** 
**– Respondent A** **ctiv ities for Regulated**  **Entities**
**. 4(b)(ii)(1). Registrant A** **ctiv ities**  **for Nonrefillable Containers Respondent**  **Paperwork A ctivity**  **Description**
**1. Read instructions** Read container regulations. **2. Plan activities**

- Determine whether your products are subject to the container requirements, and if so which ones.

- Determine what subset of the DOT regulations your products are subject to.

- Develop plan to comply. **3. Gather information**

- Determine if the containers holding your products dispense properly and have standard closures.

- Develop residue removal data for dilutable pesticides in rigid containers.

- Prepare waiver request (if desired). **4. Create information**

- Develop and maintain a recordkeeping system of test data and documentation for container/formulation combinations.

- Subm it waiver request. **5. Store/maintain data** File and maintain copies of all container records for as long as the container is used and for 3 years afterwards.Page **10** of **25**

**4(b)(ii)(2). Registrant A** **ctiv ities for Refillable Containers**  **Respondent Paperwork A** **ctivity Description** 
**1. Read instructions** Read container regulations. **2. Plan activities**

- Determine what standards your refillable containers must meet.

- Develop plan to comply. **3. Gather information**

- Determine if your refillable containers meet the specified DOT regulations.

- Determine if your refillable containers are marked with a serial number and have a one

-way valve or tamper

- evident device on each opening. **4. Store/maintain data** No refillable container records are required. **4(b)(ii)( 3**  **). Registrant A** **ctiv ities for Distributing to Refillers**  **for Repackaging Respondent**  **Paperwork A ctivity**  **Description**
**1. Read instructions** Read container regulations.
**2. Plan activities** Develop plan to comply. **3. Create information** 

- Develop a recordkeeping system for contracts with refillers.

- Develop residue removal procedures.

- Develop a written list of acceptable containers. **4. Store/maintain data** Maintain records of contracts with refillers and “informational” records for current operating year and for 3 years afterwards. **4(b)(ii)( 4**  **). Registrant A** **ctiv ities for Repackaging Directly**  **into Refillable Containers**  **Respondent Paperwork A** **ctivity Description** 
**1. Read instructions** Read container regulations. **2. Plan activities**  Develop plan to comply. **3. Gather information** Gather labeling, written residue removal procedures and description of acceptable containers at each producing establishment that fills refillable containers **4 . Create information** 

- Record s pecified information each time product is repackaged.
**5. Enforce & monitor** Inspect and relabel containers. **6 . Store/maintain data** 

- File and maintain copies of all “informational” container records for the current operating year and for 3 years afterwards.

- File and maintain copies of all repackaging records for 3 years (all products other than swimming pool chemicals).Page **11** of **25**

**4(b)(ii)(5). Refiller (non**  **- registrant) A** **ctiv ities for Repackaging**  **Respondent Paperwork A** **ctivity Description** 
**1. Read instructions**  Read container regulations. **2. Plan activities** Determine what repackaging requirements you must comply with and plan com pliance. **3. Gather information** Gather labeling, written residue removal procedures and description of acceptable containers. **4. Create information**

- Develop and maintain a recordkeeping system for contracts with registrants who allow you to repackage their pesticide for distribution and sale and all required container information.

- Record specified information each time product is repackaged. **5. Enforce & monitor** Inspect and relabel containers. **6. Store/maintain data**

- File and maintain copies of all “informational” container records for the current operating year and for 3 years afterwards.

- Record and ma intain repackaging records for 3 years. **4(b)(ii)(6). Swimming Pool**  **Supply Company**  **Ac tiv**  **ities for Repackaging**  **Respondent Paperwork A** **ctivity Description** 
**1. Read instructions** Read container regulations. **2. Plan activities** Determine what repackaging requirements you must comply with and plan com pliance. **3. Gather information** Gather labeling, written residue removal procedures and description of acceptable containers. **4. Create information** Develop and maintain a recordkeeping system for contracts with registrants who allow you to repackage their pesticide for distribution and sale and all required container information. (No repackaging recordkeeping is required.) **5. Enforce & monitor** Inspect and relabel containers. **6. Store/maintain data**  File and maintain copies of “informational” container records for the current operating year and for 3 years afterwards. (No repackaging recordkeeping is required.) **4(b)(ii)(7). Respondent A** **ctivities for Labeling Requirements** All registrants are required to comply with the labeling requirements, and the Agency allowed label changes to be submitted by notification. Because the deadline for compliance with the container labeling requirements was August 16, 2011, there will not be any new notifi cations associated with these requirements . T he required container instructions will be included in newly submitted labels , covered under the ICR for the registration of pesticides under FIFRA section 3

.Page **12** of **25**

**4(b)(ii i**  **). Containment**  **- Respondent A** **ctiv ities**  **for Regulated Entities Respondent Paperwork**  **Activity Description** 
**1. Read instructions** Read containment regulations. **2. Plan activities** Plan activities
**3 . Create information** 

- Inspect and maintain each containment structure and each stationary bulk container and its appurtenances monthly. Record the following information: (1) name of the person conducting the inspection or maintenance; (2) date the inspection or maintenance was conducted; (3) conditions noted; (4) specific m aintenance performed.

- Inspect and maintain each non

- stationary bulk container and record the tim e period that it remains at the same location in the facility. **4 . Store/maintain data** 

- File and maintain copies of all inspection and maintenance for 3 ye ars.

- File and maintain data on time

- in

- location for all non

- stationary bulk containers which are not protected by secondary containment for 3 years.

- File and maintain documents proving the construction date of the facility (to demonstrate whether it is subject to the standards for new or existing structures ) for as long as the structure is in use and for 3 years afterwards.

**5. The Information**  **Collected -**  **Ag ency** **A ctivities, Collection Methodology, and**  **Information Management 5(a)**  **EPA Ac** **tiv ities** 
**– Containers** 
**.** EPA does not anticipate collecting or calling

- in the records retained to comply with the container regulations. The data maintained by registrants, refillers and swimming pool applicators will be available for review by EPA or its designee to ensure compl iance with the regulations and in the event that a problem arises with a particular type of container. However, EPA anticipates that there may be waiver requests from some or all of the container design and residue removal requirements.

**Ag ency A** **ctivit y**  **Description 1. Receive Waiver**  **Requests and Inquiries** There are approximately 15,000 pesticide products registered by EPA, and waiver requests may be submitted for some products

. Subm issions will have to be screened for confidentiality and protected accordingly. **2. Plan activities** FEAD will coordinate with the 3 divisions who make registration decisions: RD, AD and BPPD to respond to waiver requests. Records of waivers will be maintained as usual by the registering divisions, and possibly in an additional database unique to container issues. **3. Create information** EPA will use existing d atabases to store and track incoming information.Page **13** of **25**

**4. Complete paperwork** FEAD and registering divisions will coordinate to prepare responses to waiver requests stating approval/disapproval with comments. **5. Monitor DOT regulatory actions and publish FRNs**  The FEAD disposal team will have to monitor FR Notices issued by DOT to determine if the DOT regulations referred to in the container rule have been changed, and if so, must publish an EPA FR notice informing the regulated community of any changes. **6. Store/maintain data** Store, file, and maintain copies of waiver requests and responses/ authorizations. **5(b). Collection Methodology**  **and Management** EPA expects to receive and review waiver requests for new products as they are submitted

. The correspondence may be submitted in printed or electronic format, including e

- mail, according to the respondent’s preference. As itemized in 5(a), EPA will receive and manage these waiver requests in accordance with its existing and standard procedures for the receipt and management of information submitted to it under the pesticide laws. **5(c). Small Entity** 

**Flexibility** Small entities are generally subject to the same requirements as large entities. The information to be recorded is straightforward and can be maintained by facilities in the manner they see fit, as long as the records are available for review during routi ne establishment inspections by the states. The notifications and waiver requests involve the use of existing forms and processes, which reflect the consideration of small entity flexibility in their establishment. No new forms are being established for these regulations. **5(d). Collection Schedule**  Not applicable. The activity is conducted only as needed by state inspections , or upon the determination of the respondent . There is no set schedule for the collection of this information. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** 
**– Container Design and**  **Residue Removal Regulations 6(a). Estimating Regulated Community**  **Burden and Costs** The respondent burden reflected in this ICR is based o n the two Economic Analyses (EAs ) that were prepared for the final regulations. See Attachments E and F. For ease in presentation, the burden and costs for the container design and residue removal requirements are discussed separately from those related to the containment requirements . After discussing the burden and costs separately, the burden and cost estimates are totaled in section 6( c ) of this ICR

. The burden on the regulated community considered in this analysis is the administrative burden associated with the time sp ent to record and maintain the necessary records. There is no requirement to submit the records to the Agency. ThePage **14** of **25**

burden also includes a review of the regulations and a determination of how the regulations affect the respondent, which we re expected to o ccur in the first year of compliance with the regulations, but that may occur when new pesticides are registered and as a periodic review of compliance

. **6(a)(i). Container.** The ICR estimates all recordkeeping and reporting burden and costs associated with the regulations. A separate analysis is provided below for each of the three regulated industries for the pesticide container regulations. The labor rates used in the analysis were developed for the EA and i nclude both fringe benefits and overhead. Based on the information in the EA, this ICR will use wage rates for an administrative labor category and a professional labor category . The current wage rates are $3 6

. 79 for the administrative labor category and $1 2 4.1 0 for professional (technical) labor. **6(a) (i)**  **(1)**
**. Container Requirements**  **- Pesticide Registrants** 
**.** There are three separate sets of paperwork burden activities for pesticide registrants. Tables 6 .1, 6 .2, and 6 .3 describe the estimated burden and costs associated with these activities. For nonrefillable containers, t he burden is associated with ensuring that new formulations and containers meet the requirements and submitting waiver requests

. As with any change in labeling or registration requirements, a certain number of waiver requests is to be expected, and processing waivers is an ongoing activity. The Agency estimates that if a registrant wishes to submit an application for a waiver fro m some of the requirements of the rule , professional labor will be used . The burden for the application of a waiver is estimated to be the same in each year, which is likely an overestimate. It is estimated that one percent of pesticide registrants may a pply for a waiver. To simplify the analysis, the burden and costs estimated for the application of a waiver are applied to the nonrefillable container burden and cost estimates (registrants can apply for a waiver for a subset of both nonrefillable and refillable requirements). It is estimated that each respondent will spend seven hours on the paperwork activities associated with nonrefillable containers (Table 6. 1). 1 At a cost of $ 3 6

. 79 per hour for the administrative labor and $ 1 2 4.1 0 per hour for th e professional labor, the estimated cost, assuming seven hours of time spent on the information collection, per respondent, is estimated to be $ 607

. **Table 6**  **.1 Ave**  **rage Annual Burden Estimates**  **per Registrant Respondent to Comply w**  **ith the Requirements for Nonrefillable Containers**  Activity Burden Hours (per Year) Costs ($) (per Year) Adm inistrative Professional Total Hours
1. Read instructions 0 0.5 0.5 62

1 The amount of time estimated for these activities depends on the size of the facility. For this analysis, since there are relatively more small pesticide registrants and agricultural pesticide refillers potentially impacted by the regulations than large registrant and agricultural pesticide refillers, estimates of burden are based on small facilities

- medium

- small facility burden estimates are used.Page **15** of **25**

2. Plan activities 0 0.5 0.5 62 3. Gather information 1 2 3 285 4. Create information 1 0.5 1.5 99 5. Store/maintain data 1 0.5 1.5 99 Total Burden 3 4 7 607 Adm inistrative labor costs $ 36.79/hour, professional labor costs $ 1 2 4.1 0/hour. The total annual paperwork burden across all respondents, assuming that 1,804 2 registrants will be affected by the requirement, is 5, 484 hours (Table 6. 1), with a total annual cost estimated to be $208,063. **AN NUA** **L BURDEN:** (3 hours per registrant X 1,804 registrants ) + (4 hours per facility X (1,804 registrants X 1 % of registrants )) = 5,412 hours + 72 hours = 5, 484 hours per year **AN NUA** **L COST:** (3 hours per registrant X $ 3 6

. 79/hour X 1,804 registrants ) + (4 hours per registrant X $ 1 2 4.1 0/hour X (1,804 registrant X 1 % of registrants )) = $ 199,108 + $ 8,955 = $ 208,063 For the paperwork burden activities associated with registrants distributing pesticide to refillers for repackaging into refillable containers, it is estimated that 2 hours will be spent per registrant respondent (Table 6. 2). These burden estimates includ e both the activities associated with refillable containers and for registrants distributing pesticides to refillers for repackaging . At a cost of $ 36.79 per hour for the administrative labor, the estimated cost now that the contracts are in place , assumi ng two hours of time spent on information collection, per respondent, is estimated to be $ 7 4 . The total annual paperwork burden across all respondents, assuming that 1,804 registrants will be affected by the requirement, is 3,608 hours after the first year (Table 6. 2). **Table 6**  **.2 Ave**  **rage Annual Burden Estimates**  **per Registrant Respondent to Comply w**  **ith the Requirements for Refillable Containers and Distributing**  **Pesticide to Refillers**  **for Repackaging** Activity Burden Hours (per Year) Costs (per Year) ($) ($ 36.79 per hour) Adm inistrative Total Hours 1. Read instructions 0 0 0 2. Plan activities 0 0 0 3. Create information 1 1 3 7 4. Store/maintain data 1 1 3 7 Total Burden 2 2 74 **AN NUA** **L BURDEN:** 2 hours per registrant X 1,804 registrants = 3,608 hours per year

2 Estimate of the number of pesticide registrants estimated to be impacted by the rulemaking. See the Economic Analysis of the Pesticide Container Design and Residue Removal Standards.Page **16** of **25**

**AN NUA** **L COST:** 2 hours per registrant X $ 36.79/hour X 1,804 registrants = $ 132,738 It is estimated that 7.5 administrative hours , at a cost of $ 36.79 per hour will be spent for each registrant for the paperwork activities associated repacka ging directly into refillable containers (Table 6. 3). The total annual paperwork burden across all respondents, assuming that 1,804 registrants will be affected by the requirement, is 1 3 , 530 hours after the first year (Table 6. 3). **Table 6**  **.3 Ave**  **rage Annual Burden Estimates**  **per Registrant Respondent for**  **Registrants that Repackag**  **e Directly**  **into Refillable Containers** Activity Burden Hours (per Year) Costs (per Year) ($) ($ 36.79 per hour) Adm inistrative Total Hours 1. Read instructions 0.5 0.5 1 8 2. Plan activities 0.5 0.5 1 8 2. Gather Information 1.0 1.0 3 7 3. Create information 1.0 1.0 3 7 4. Enforce & Monitor 4.0 4.0 14 7 5 . Store/maintain data 0.5 0.5 1 8 Total Burden 7.5 7.5 2 76 **AN NUA** **L BURDEN:** 7.5 hours per registrant3 X 1,804 facilities = 1 3 , 530 hours per year **AN NUA** **L COST:** 7.5 hours per registrant X $ 36.79/hour X 1,804 facilities = $497,769 The estimated annual burden per pesticide registrant respondent associated with nonrefillable pesticide container record keepi ng activities is 7 hours per year (See Table 6.1) . The estimated annual burden per registrant associated with distributing pesticides to refillers for repackaging and distributing pesticide directly in refillable containers is 2 hours per year and 7.5 per year (Tables 6.2 and 6.3) , respectively . Based on an estimated 1,804 pesticide registrants affected by the requirement per year, the total annual burden is estimated to be 22,622 hours per year . (See Tables 6 .1, 6 .2 and 6 .3) **TOTA L**  **AN NUA** **L BURDEN :**  5, 484 + 3,608 + 1 3 , 530 = 22,622 hours per year The estimated annual cost per pesticide registrant respondent associated with nonrefillable pesticide containers record keeping activities is $ 522 per year . The estimated annual cost per registrant associated wit h refillable containers and repackaging is $ 70 and $ 35 , respectively. Based on an estimated 1,804 pesticide registrants affected by the requirement per year, the total annual cost is estimated to be $ 415,970 . (See Tables 6 .1, 6 .2 and 6 .3)

3 This requirement actually applies to each producing establishment, and here assumes that the averag e registrant has one facility that refills containersPage **17** of **25**

**TOTA L**  **AN NUA** **L COSTS**  **:** $ 208,063 + $ 132,738 + $ 497,769 = $ 838,570 **6(a) (i)**  **( 2**  **)**
**. Container Requirements**  **- Ag**  **ricultural Pesticide Refillers**
**.** The paperwork burden activities that affect agricultural pesticide refillers are associated with the repackaging of agricultural pesti cides directly into refillable containers. It is estimated that seven and one

- half h ours will be spent per year for the paperwork activities associated with repackaging agricultural pesticides directly into refillable containers (Table 6. 4). **Table 6**  **.4 Ave**  **rage An**  **nual Burden Estimates per**  **Ag ricultural Pesticide Refiller**  **Respondent for Repackaging Directly**  **into Refillable Containers** Activity Burden Hours (per Year) Costs (per Year) ($) ($ 36.79 per hour) Adm inistrative Total Hours 1. Read instructions 0.5 0.5 18 2. Plan activities 0.5 0.5 18 3. Gather Information 1.0 1.0 37 4. Create information 1.0 1.0 37 5. Enforce and Monitor 4.0 4.0 147 6. Store/maintain data 0.5 0.5 18 Total Burden 7.5 7.5 276 The estimated annual burden per agricultural pesticide refiller associated with record keeping activities is seven and one

- half hours per year . Based on an estimated 16,795 agricultural pesticide refillers affected by the requirements per year, the total annual burden is estimated to be 125,963 hours per year
. The estimated annual cost per agricultural pesticide refiller associated with record keeping is $ 2 7 6 . Assuming 16,795 agricultural pesticide refil lers and a labor cost of $36.79 , the estimated total annual cost is $4, 634 , 160 per year (See Table 6 .4)

. **AN NUA** **L BURDEN:** 7.5 hours per refiller X 16,795 refillers = 125,963 hours per year **AN NUA** **L COST:** 7.5 hours per refiller X $ 36.79/hour X 16,795 refille rs = $4, 634 , 160 per year **6(a) (i)**  **( 3**  **)**
**. Container Requirements**  **- Swimming Pool Supply**  **Companies**
**.** The paperwork activities that affect swimming pool supply companies are associated with repackaging antimicrobial pesticides into refillable containers. It is estimated that seven and one half hours will be spent per year for the paperwork activities associated with refillable containers (Table 6. 5 ). **Table 6**  **.5 Ave**  **rage An**  **nual Burden Estimates per**  **Swimming Pool Supply Company**  **for Repackaging Directly**  **into Refillable Containers**  Activity Burden Hours (per Year) Costs (per Year) ($) ($ 3 6.79 per hour) Adm inistrative Total HoursPage **18** of **25**

1. Read instructions 0.5 0.5 18 2. Plan activities 0.5 0.5 18 3. Gather Information 1.0 1.0 37 4. Create information 1.0 1.0 37 5. Enforce and Monitor 4.0 4.0 147 6. Store/maintain data 0.5 0.5 18 Total Burden 7.5 7.5 276 Based on an estimated 322 swimming pool supply companies affected by the requirements per year, the total annual burden is estimated to be 2,415 hours per year. At a cost of $3 6.79 per hour for the administrative labor, the estimated cost per respondent is $2 76 per year. (Table 6.5) Assuming 322 swimming pool supply companies , the estimated total annual cost per year is $88 , 848

. **AN NUA** **L BURDEN:** 7.5 hours per company x 322 companies = 2,415 hours per year **AN NUA** **L COST:** 7.5 hours per company X $ 36.79/hour X 322 companies = $8 8 , 848 **6(a)(i)( 4**  **). Total Respondent Burden and Costs for the Container**  **Regulations**
**.** The bottom line estimates for the contai ner regulations represent the total annual burden and costs estimates per year . Table 6 .6 provides the total estimated annualized burden and costs for respondents, as well as the total estimated annualized burden and costs for the Agency: **Table 6**  **.6 An**  **nual Bottom Line Hours and Costs for the Container Regulations Collection A** **ctivity An**  **nual Burden** Hours Cost **Respondent Burden and Costs** Registrants (see 6(a) (i)(1) ) 22,622 $838,570 Ag Refillers (see 6( a)(i)(2) 125,963 $4,634,160 Swimming Pool Suppliers (see 6( a)(i)(3) 2,415 $88,848 **Total for each year after compliance:** 151,000 $5,561,578 **Annual Agency Burden and Costs Ag**  **ency Total (See Table**  **6**
**. 8**  **)** 232 $ 1 6 , 499 **6(a)( i**  **i). Containment.** A n administrative labor category was assi gned with an average rate of $ 36.79 per hour to inspect containment structures and to maintain records of inspection and maintenance

. The main on

- going activities include inspecting facilities monthly and recording the required information, which is estimated to take an average of 15 minutes per month, or three hours a year

. T he activity associated with storing and maintaining th is information and the records of the age of the containment structure and any large mobile containers (if applicable) is estimated to take an average of five minutes perPage **19** of **25**

month, or one hour per year , for a total burden of 4 hours per year (see Table. 6.7)

. **Table 6** 
**. 7**  **An nual**  **Ave rage**  **Burden Estimates per Respondent to Comply**  **with the Containment Regulations**  Activity Burden Hours (per Year) Costs (per Year) ($) ($ 3 6.79 per hour) Adm inistrative Total Hours 1. Read instructions 0 0 0 2. Plan activities 0 0 0 3 . Create information 3 3 1 10 4 . Monitor & enforce 1 1 3 7 Total Burden 4 4 147 At a cost of $ 36.79 per hour for administrative labor, the estimated cost per year for four hours of time spent on the information collection, per respondent, is $147 . The total annual paperwork burden across all respondents, assuming that 4,665 4 facilities will be affected by the requirement, is 18,660 hours per year. Based on an estimated 4,665 facilities affected by the requirement per year, the total annual co st is estimated to be $ 6 86,501 per year. **AN NUA** **L BURDEN:** 4 hours per facility x 4,665 facilities = 18,660 hours per year **AN NUA** **L COSTS :**  4 hours X $ 3 6

. 7 9/ho ur X 4,665 facilities = $ 686,501 These figures represent the total industry burden and cost for containment structures regulations

. **6( b**  **). Estimating EPA**  **Burden and Cost** EPA does not anticipate collecting or calling

- in the records retained to comply with the container regulations. The data maintained by registrants, refillers and swimming pool applicators will be available for review by EPA or its designee to ensure compliance with the regulatio ns and in the event that a problem arises with a particular type of container. However, EPA anticipates that , as with most registration requirements and label amendments, there may be waiver requests from some of the container requirements. There are no regular burden impacts to EPA in the containment regulations. Agency labor rates are based on Office of Personnel Management salary tables for federal employees and include benefits and overhead costs, as well as locality pay for the W ashington, DC

- Baltimore area. For management, the wage rate is $ 120.32 per hour; f or technical workers, the wage rate is $7 7.85 ; for clerical workers, the wage rate is $ 44.05

. Estimates for the Agency's burden are provided below.

4 Estimate of the number of bulk pesticide containment facilities estimated to be impacted by the rulemaking. See the Economic Analysis of the Bulk Pesticide Containment Structures.Page **20** of **25**

**Table 6**
**. 8**  **Ave rage**  **Annual EPA**  **Burden Estimates for EPA**  **to Implement the Container**  **and Containment Regulat**  **ions**

**COLLECTION A CTIVITIES**  BURDEN HOURS (per year) COSTS (per ye ar) ($) Mgm t. $ 1 20/hr Tech.

$ 7 8/hr Cler.

$44/hr Total

Hours Total Costs 1) Receive notifications, waiver requests and inquiries 2 90 10 112 7,688 2) Plan activities 5 20 5 30 2,379 3) Create information 0 20 10 30 1,997 4) Complete paperwork 0 30 15 45 2,996 5) Monitor DOT regulatory actions and publish FRNs 0 10 5 15 999 6) Store/maintain data 0 0 10 10 440 TOTAL BURDEN 7 170 55 232 16,499 Mgm t. refers to management; Tech. refers to technical; and Cler. refers to clerical. (a) Management

- 7 hours X $ 1 20 = $ 842 (b) Technical

- 170 hours x $ 7 8 = $1 3 , 234 (c) Clerical

- 55 hours x $ 4 4 = $2, 423

TOTAL $ 1 6 , 499 **6( c**  **). Bottom Line Burden Hours and Costs for this ICR** 
**– Combined**  **Container and Containment Regulations** The total combined bottom line burden for both the container design and residue removal regulations and the containment structure regulations are discussed in this section

. The Agency’s estimates are detailed earlier in section 6, and are briefly summarized as follows :

 Estimated total number of potential respondents: 23,586 . This includes 1,804 registrants + 16,795 agricultural pesticide refillers + 322 swi mming pool supply companies + 4,665 facilities requiring pesticide containment structures

.  Frequency of response: On occasion. There is no regular reporting involved. This ICR only involves recordkeeping requirements.
 Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent: 1.
 Estimated total respondent annual burden hours: 169,660 hours ( 151,000 for the container regulations and + 18,660 for the containment regulations ).
 Estimated total respondent annual costs: $ 6, 248 , 079

. This includes an est imated burden cost of $ 5,561,578 for container regulations and an estimated cost of $ 686,501 for containment regulations for maintenance and operational costs

.Page **21** of **25**

**Table 6.**  **9 An**  **nual Bottom Line Hours and Costs / Master Table Collection A** **ctivity An**  **nual Burden**  Hours Cost **Respondent (Regulated Community) Burden and Costs** Container Design an d Residue Removal ( Table 6 .6 ) 151,000 $ 5,561,578 Containment Structures ( Table 6. 7 ): 18,660 $ 686,501 **Total Respondent Burden and Cost for Container and Containment**  **Regulations Combined** 169,660 $6, 248,079 **Annual Agency Burden and Costs**
**– Container Design and Residue Removal**  Container Design and Residue Removal (See Table 6. 8 ) 232 $ 16,499 Containment Structures (See Subsection 6( b ) ) 0 0 **Total A gency Burden and**  **Cost for Container and Containment Regulations Combined**  232 $ 16,499
**6( d**  **). Reasons for Change in Burden**  **for this ICR**
The changes to the overall estimated burden for this ICR were based on th re e revisions. First, t he estimated annual burden on pesticide registrants to comply with the nonrefillable container regulations decreased . During implementation of the container regulations over the past three years , EPA received very few waiver requests from registrants . Therefore, the estimated rate of registrants that request waivers decreased from 5% in the previous ICR to 1% of registrants in this ICR. Second, t he estimated average annual burden per respondent for pesticide registrants who repackage into refillable containers increased to more accu rately reflect the registrant repackaging activities, which are very similar to the repackaging activities conducted by refillers and swimming pool supply companies. T he description of activities for registrants that repackage was changed to be consistent with the activities in the following two sections. ( S ee S ection 4(b)(ii)(4)

- (6)

. ) T he average annual burden per registrant respondent that repackages directly into refillable containers was increased from 1 hour to 7.5 hours per respondent to be the same as the average burden per refiller or swimming pool supply company (Table 6.3). T h ird, th e estimated annual burden for entities that are subject to the containment requirements decreased because t he contai nment activities identified in the previous ICR included some activities that were completed by the compliance date of August 16, 2009. Therefore the table describing the activities ( S ection 4(b)(iii)) and the estimated average annual burden (Table 6.7) were adjusted to include only the on

going annual information collection activities required by the containment regulations. As a result of these three changes, the overall industry burden estimate decreased 4 , 890.5 hours, from 174,550.5 hours to 169,660 hours

.Page **22** of **25**

There were a number of other chang es to this supporting statement to improve its accuracy, delete superfluous details relating to earlier versions for the ICR, and reflect the on

- going paperwork burden now that the container and containment regula tions are full in effect (after the last compliance date of August 16, 2011). The changes include :

 Deleting information that explained the difference s between the previous ICR and the versions prior to that;
 Deleting text, tables and wording that is no longer necessary because it referred to activities that were conducted during the first three years, such as adjusting the containment activities as described above; removing references to any “Year 1” activities now that the ICR only covers on

- going annua l activities; deleting discussions of the label changes by notification, which were completed by the compliance date of August 16, 2011; and deleting the short section on State Agency Cost and Burden (section 6(b) because the burden to states occurred before 2009.
 Revising specific phrases throughout to fix editorial mistakes or to improve the clarity or accuracy of the statement. **6( e**  **). Burden Statement**  **for this ICR** The total estimated annual respondent paperwork burden to comply with the information collection a ctivity is 169 , 660 hours. The respondent burden includes 151,000 hours associated with the container design and residue removal regulations and 18,660 hours associated with the containment structure regulations. The respondent burden hours fo r the container regulations represents an estimated per respondent burden of 16.5 hours per Pesticide Registrant, 7.5 hours per Agricultural Refiller and 7. 5 hours per Swimming Pool Supplier. The respondent burden hours for containment regulations represe nts an estimated burden of 4 hours per respondent. As defined by the PRA and 5 CFR 1320.3(b), “burden” means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclos ing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. The OMB control numbers for certain EPA regulations codified in Chapter 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the preamble of the final rule, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. For this ICR activity, in addition to displaying the applicable OMB control number in the final rule, the Agency has a mended the table in 40 CFR §9.1 to list the OMB control number assigned to this ICR activity.Page **23** of **25**

The Agency has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OPP

-20 12

- 0 7 37 , which is available for on

- line viewing at www.regulations.gov , or in person viewing at the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N W. , Washington, DC 20460

- 0001. You may submit comments regarding the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques. Comments may be sub mitted to EPA electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or by mail addressed to Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822 1 T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW , Wa shington, D.C. 20460. You can also send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, N W, Wa shington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Office for EPA. Include docket ID No. EPAHQ

OPP

-20 12

- 07 37 and OMB control number 2070

- 0133 in any corresponden ce.Page **24** of **25 List of**  **At tachments for**  **t h**  **is Supporting Statement**  **Attachment A FIFRA**  **Sections 3, 8, 19 and 25** This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket EPA HQ

- OPP

-20 12

- 07 37 and electronically at http://www.epa.gov/opp00001/regulating/fifra.pdf. **Attachment B Pesticide Management and Disposal; Standards for Pesticide** 

**Containers and Containment; Final Rule (A ugust 16, 2006)**  This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket EPAHQ

- OPP

-20 12

- 0 7 37

. **Attachment C Pesticide Management and D**  **isposal; Standards for Pesticide**

**Containers and Containment [A mendments]; Final Rule**  **(October 29, 2008)** This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket EPAHQ

- OPP

-20 12

- 07 37

. **Attachment D Display**  **Related to OMB Control #2070 -** **0133 -**  **Listings o f**  **Related Regulations in 40 CFR 9.1**
**.** This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket EPAHQ

- OPP

-20 12

- 07 37

. **Attachment E Economic A** **naly sis of the Bulk Pesticide Container Design and** 

**Residue Removal Standards** This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket EPAHQ

- OPP

-20 12

- 07 37

. **Attachment F Economic A** **naly sis of the Bulk Pesticides Containment** 

**Structures Final Regulation** This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket EPAHQ

- OPP

-20 12

- 07 37

. **Attachment G Work Sheets**  **to Calculate Industry and EPA** 

**Labor Costs** This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket EPAHQ

- OPP

-20 12

- 07 37

.Page **25** of **25 Attachment**  **D Display**  **Related to OMB Control #2070 -** **0133 -**  **Listings of Related Regulations in 40 CFR 9.1**  As of May 10, 1993, the OMB approval numbers for EPA regulations in Chapter I of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) appear in a listing in 40 CFR 9.1 (58 FR 27472). This listing fulfills the display requirements in section 3507(f) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) for EPA regulations. The listing at 40 CFR 9.1 displays this OMB Control number for the following regulation: **§ 9.1 OMB approvals under the Paperwork Reduction A ct.** 

------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------- 40 CFR citation OMB Control No.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **Pesticide Management and Disposal**

**----------------------------------- -------------------------------------**  Part 165............................................... 2070

- 0133

This captures all of the information collection requirements in Part 165 which includes the following provisions: 165.27, 165.65, 165.67, 1 65.70, 165.95, and 165.97.