Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 248 / Thursday, December 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules 78303 

transition to an RNAV route structure in 

support of the NextGen initiative. 

T–325: This proposed new route 

would extend between BWG and TTH to 

replace the cancelled Federal airway 

route segment of V–243 between BWG 

and TTH described above. The proposed 

routing of T–325 between BWG and the 

APALO, IN, waypoint (WP), and 

between the new BUNKA, IN, WP and 

TTH, are exact overlays of the route 

segments of V–243 proposed for 

cancellation. 

The navigation aid radials cited in the 

proposed VOR Federal airway route 

description, below, are stated relative to 

True north. 

Domestic VOR Federal airways are 

published in paragraph 6010(a) and low 

altitude RNAV routes (T) are published 

in paragraph 6011, respectively, of FAA 

Order 7400.9X dated August 7, 2013, 

and effective September 15, 2013, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The VOR Federal airway and low 

altitude RNAV route listed in this 

document would be subsequently 

published in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that would only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it would modify the route structure as 

necessary to preserve the safe and 

efficient flow of air traffic within the 

NAS. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9X, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 7, 2013 and 

effective September 15, 2013, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6010 VOR Federal Airways 

* * * * * 

V–243 [Amended] 

From Craig, FL; Waycross, GA; Vienna, GA; 

LaGrange, GA; INT LaGrange 342° and 

Choo Choo, GA, 189° radials; Choo Choo; 

to Bowling Green, KY. 

* * * * * 

Paragraph 6011 United States Area 

Navigation Routes 

* * * * * 

T–325 Bowling Green, KY to Terre Haute, IN [New] 

Bowling Green, KY 

(BWG) 

VORTAC (Lat. 36°55′43′′ N., long. 086°26′36′′ W.) 

RENRO, KY WP (Lat. 37°28′51′′ N., long. 086°39′19′′ W.) 

LOONE, KY WP (Lat. 37°44′14′′ N., long. 086°45′18′′ W.) 

APALO, IN WP (Lat. 38°00′21′′ N., long. 086°51′35′′ W.) 

BUNKA, IN WP (Lat. 39°04′57′′ N., long. 087°09′07′′ W.) 

Terre Haute, IN 

(TTH) 

VORTAC (Lat. 39°29′20′′ N., long. 087°14′56′′ W.) 

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 

18, 2013. 

Gary A. Norek, 

Manager, Airspace Policy & Regulations 

Group. 

[FR Doc. 2013–30698 Filed 12–24–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0952; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AGL–18] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Modification of Area 

Navigation (RNAV) Route T–265, IL 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

modify RNAV route T–265 in support of 

the O’Hare Modernization Project 

(OMP)/Chicago Airspace Project (CAP). 

This proposed action would insert a 

dogleg and re-align T–265 slightly to the 

west to provide appropriate lateral 

spacing from a new Rockford Airport 

Traffic Control Tower (RFD) and 

Chicago Terminal Radar Approach 

Control (C90) airspace boundary and to 

maintain the efficiency and safety of 

aircraft transitioning around the Chicago 

Class B airspace area. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
78304 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 248 / Thursday, December 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 10, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001; telephone: 

(202) 366–9826. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0952 and 

Airspace Docket No. 13–AGL–18 at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and ATC 

Procedures Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0952 and Airspace Docket No. 13– 

AGL–18) and be submitted in triplicate 

to the Docket Management Facility (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0952 and 

Airspace Docket No. 13–AGL–18.’’ The 

postcard will be date/time stamped and 

returned to the commenter. 

All communications received on or 

before the specified closing date for 

comments will be considered before 

taking action on the proposed rule. The 

proposal contained in this action may 

be changed in light of comments 

received. All comments submitted will 

be available for examination in the 

public docket both before and after the 

closing date for comments. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. 

Availability of NPRM’s 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined during 

normal business hours at the office of 

the Central Service Center, Operations 

Support Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 2601 Meacham Blvd., 

Fort Worth, TX 76137. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRM’s should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory 

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) part 71 to modify T–265 in 

support of the OMP/CAP. As part of the 

OMP/CAP, the RFD/C90 airspace 

boundary will be moved to the west. 

This proposed action would re-align T– 

265 slightly to the west by replacing the 

first two waypoints in the existing route, 

KELSI and SIMMN, with two airway 

intersection fixes, AHMED and START, 

respectively, and then re-designating the 

remaining waypoints in the route, 

BULLZ and VEENA, as airway 

intersection fixes also. The proposed 

route modification would ensure 

appropriate lateral spacing from the new 

RFD/C90 airspace boundary and 

eliminate the need for manual air traffic 

control (ATC) coordination or aircraft to 

accomplish frequency changes between 

the two facilities. This modification 

would shorten T–265 by almost two 

nautical miles while providing the same 

level of convenience to the flying public 

with an easy way to file and fly around 

the Chicago Class B airspace area 

between Chicago/Rockford International 

Airport, IL, and Chicago O’Hare 

International Airport, IL. 

Low altitude RNAV routes are 

published in paragraph 6011 of FAA 

Order 7400.9X, dated August 7, 2013, 

and effective September 15, 2013, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The RNAV route listed in this 

document would be subsequently 

published in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it would modify the route structure as 

required to enhance the safe and 

efficient flow of air traffic within the 

National Airspace System. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 248 / Thursday, December 26, 2013 / Proposed Rules 78305 

1Where no ‘‘applicable’’ DOE test exists for 

televisions, EPCA authorizes the Commission to use 

‘‘adequate non-Department of Energy test 

procedures’’ to obtain information for energy 

disclosures. 42 U.S.C. 6294(a)(2)(I)(ii). During FTC’s 

television labeling proceeding, DOE announced 

plans to develop a new test procedure. 74 FR 53640, 

53641 (Oct. 20, 2009). 

2 16 CFR 305.10. 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9X, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, Dated August 7, 2013, and 

effective September 15, 2013, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 6011 United States Area 

Navigation Routes 

* * * * * 

T–265 AHMED, IL to VEENA, WI [Amended] 

AHMED, IL Fix (Lat. 41°29′52′′ N., long. 88°51′52′′ W.) 

START, IL Fix (Lat. 41°45′25′′ N., long. 89°00′22′′ W.) 

BULLZ, IL Fix (Lat. 42°27′27′′ N., long. 88°46′17′′ W.) 

VEENA, WI Fix (Lat. 42°42′18′′ N., long. 88°18′14′′ W.) 

* * * * * 

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 

18, 2013. 

Gary A. Norek, 

Manager, Airspace Policy and ATC 

Procedures Group. 

[FR Doc. 2013–30693 Filed 12–24–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

14 CFR Parts 1260 and 1274 

RIN 2700–AE12 

Removal of Procedures for Delegation 

of Administration of Grants and 

Cooperative Agreements 

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects the 

preamble to a proposed rule published 

in the Federal Register of November 14, 

2013, regarding Procedures for 

Delegation of Administration of Grants 

and Cooperative Agreements. This 

correction provides the correct 

regulatory identification number (RIN) 

for the proposed rule. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Leigh Pomponio, 202–358–0592. 

Correction 

In proposed rule FR Doc. 2013–27232, 

beginning on page 68376 in the issue of 

November 14, 2013, make the following 

corrections in the RIN and Addresses 

sections: 

• On page 68376 in the 1st column, 

remove the RIN 2700–AE11 and add in 

its place the RIN 2700–AE12. 

• On page 68376 in the 2nd column, 

remove the RIN 2700–AE11 and add in 

its place the RIN 2700–AE12. 

Nanette Jennings, 

NASA Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2013–30793 Filed 12–24–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510–13–P 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

16 CFR Part 305 

[3084–AB15] 

Energy and Water Use Labeling for 

Consumer Products Under the Energy 

Policy and Conservation Act (‘‘Energy 

Labeling Rule’’) 

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission 

(FTC or Commission). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Commission proposes 

conforming amendments to the Energy 

Labeling Rule (‘‘Rule’’) to require a new 

Department of Energy (DOE) test 

procedure for televisions and establish 

data reporting requirements for those 

products. 

DATES: Comments must be received by 

February 10, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a 

comment online or on paper by 

following the instructions in the 

Request for Comment part of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below. Write ‘‘Television Labels, Matter 

No. R611004’’ on your comment, and 

file your comment online at https://

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/

televisionlabels by following the 

instructions on the web-based form. If 

you prefer to file your comment on 

paper, mail or deliver your comment to 

the following address: Federal Trade 

Commission, Office of the Secretary, 

Room H–113 (Annex F), 600 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20580. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hampton Newsome, (202) 326–2889, 

Attorney, Division of Enforcement, 

Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal 

Trade Commission, Room M–8102B, 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20580. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

The Commission’s Energy Labeling 

Rule (Rule) (16 CFR Part 305), issued 

pursuant to the Energy Policy and 

Conservation Act (EPCA), requires 

energy labeling for major household 

appliances and other consumer 

products to help consumers compare 

competing models. When first 

published in 1979, the Rule applied to 

eight product categories: Refrigerators, 

refrigerator-freezers, freezers, 

dishwashers, water heaters, clothes 

washers, room air conditioners, and 

furnaces. The Commission has since 

expanded the Rule’s coverage to include 

central air conditioners, heat pumps, 

plumbing products, lighting products, 

ceiling fans, certain types of water 

heaters, and televisions. 

The Rule requires manufacturers to 

attach yellow EnergyGuide labels on 

many of these products, and prohibits 

retailers from removing the labels or 

rendering them illegible. In addition, 

the Rule directs sellers, including 

retailers, to post label information on 

Web sites and in paper catalogs from 

which consumers can order products. 

EnergyGuide labels for covered 

appliances must contain three key 

disclosures: Estimated annual energy 

cost (for most products); a product’s 

energy consumption or energy 

efficiency rating as determined from 

Department of Energy (DOE) test 

procedures; and a comparability range 

displaying the highest and lowest 

energy costs or efficiency ratings for all 

similar models.1 For energy cost 

calculations, the Rule specifies national 

average costs for applicable energy 

sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, oil) 

as calculated by DOE. The Rule sets a 

five-year schedule for updating range of 

comparability and average unit energy 

cost information.2 The Commission 

updates the range information based on 

manufacturer data submitted pursuant 

to the Rule’s reporting requirements. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS