alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Know It 2 Own It: Helping People with Disabilities Access Middle Class Careers      

# Know It 2 Own It: Helping People with Disabilities Access Middle Class Careers

This blog post describes efforts of federal agencies and departments to support the employment of individuals with disabilities and action steps to increase access to jobs and job skills. 

http://www.ed.gov/blog/2015/03/know-it-2-own-it-helping-people-with-disabilities-access-middle-class-careers/?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
**Exhibit 12.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, Håkan Zadler, certify that:

 

1.         I havereviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Tele2 AB;

 

2.         Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.         Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

a)         Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)        Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)         Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.         Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)         Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)        Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date:  June 28,****2004

 

 
|   | Signature: | /s/ Håkan Zadler   |   |
|--------|------------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:      | Håkan Zadler       |
|   | Title:     | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Bullying: Dispelling Myths, Enhancing Prevention      

# Bullying: Dispelling Myths, Enhancing Prevention

This article provides an overview of bullying and its relationship with suicide. It also presents SAMHSA’s collaborative approach to bullying prevention, highlighting the Media Guidelines for Bullying Prevention, which media outlets can use when developing stories related to bullying to ensure that they reflect balanced and accurate coverage.

http://store.samhsa.gov/product/SAMHSA-News-Bullying-Dispelling-Myths-Enhancing-Prevention/SAM14-221
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           PPRER0Z22054A      

# PPRER0Z22054A

Shepherd, L.M., Sly, K.F.,  Girard, J.M. (2017). Comparison of comprehensive and abstinence-only sexuality education in young African American adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 61, 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.09.006

LowThis study received a low study quality rating because there was only one subject or cluster in either the treatment or control condition.

### Program Information

### Research Design
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed March 27, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00205

- CV

NITIN JARIWALA AND C HETNA HIRA , Appellants
V.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PRATT, KANSA S , Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 17308



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Pedersen, III

Opinion by Justice Brown

Before the Court are appel lants’ amended motion for dismissal with prejudice and

a ppellee ’s re sponse reflecting agreement with the dismissal. W e GRANT the motion and dismiss

the appeal with prejudice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

190205F.P05 /Ada Brown/
ADA BROWN JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

NITIN JARIWALA AND CHETNA HIRA, Appellants

No. 05

- 19

- 00205

- CV V.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PRATT, KANSAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 18

- 17308. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Justices Schenck and Pedersen, III participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal with prejudice.

We ORDER that eac h party bear its own costs of this appeal as agreed.

Judgment entered this 27th day of March 2019.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Coping with School Tragedies      

# Coping with School Tragedies

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration provides coping resources on its blog in the wake of the Chardon High School shooting in Ohio. The blog entry provides a hotline number that individuals can call or text for disaster and trauma crisis counseling.

http://blog.samhsa.gov/2012/02/29/copingwithtragedy/
#### Manufacturers Appraisal Company, appellee, v. Moe Rosenberg, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,776.

Action for balance due for services. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William E. *628Viner, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 14, 1926.

Brown & Alschuler, for appellant.

Barre Blumenthal, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Johnston

delivered the opinion of the court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6305

(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN, FCI Beckley,

Respondent – Appellee.

No. 22-6390

(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN, FCI Beckley,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, 

at Beckley. Frank W. Volk, District Judge. (5:21-cv-00583)

Submitted: June 27, 2023 Decided: July 10, 2023

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6390 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/10/2023 Pg: 1 of 4
2

Before KING, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6390 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/10/2023 Pg: 2 of 4
3

PER CURIAM:

(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a District of Columbia offender, seeks 

to appeal the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, and denying reconsideration. The orders 

are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A); Madley v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 278 F.3d 1306, 1310 (D.C. 

Cir. 2002) (D.C. courts are “state courts for purposes of this statute”); cf. In re Wright, 826 

F.3d 774, 783 (4th Cir. 2016) (“when a prisoner being held ‘pursuant to the judgment of a 

State court’ files a habeas petition claiming the execution of his sentence is in violation of 

the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States, the more specific § 2254 ‘and all 

associated statutory requirements’ shall apply, regardless of the statutory label the prisoner 

chooses to give his petition”). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard 

by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate 

both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 

140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Owlfeather-Gorbey 

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6390 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/10/2023 Pg: 3 of 4
4

and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6390 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/10/2023 Pg: 4 of 4
# Official Journal C 134/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 134 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6210 April 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 134

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6210 April 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2019/C 134/01 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Research Council Executive Agency for the financial year 2019 | 1 |
| 2019/C 134/02 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation for the financial year 2019 | 5 |
| 2019/C 134/03 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Research Council Executive Agency for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1 | 10 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2019/C 134/01

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Research Council Executive Agency for the financial year 2019

1

2019/C 134/02

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation for the financial year 2019

5

2019/C 134/03

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Research Council Executive Agency for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1

10

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Lyle SPANGLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-50256.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 12, 2008.

Filed June 4, 2008.

Garth E. Hire, U. S. Attorneys, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff.

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

This is the third appeal Kenneth Lyle Spangle has filed in connection with his *694bench trial conviction for mailing threatening communications, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876(c), and the 72-month sentence imposed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Spangle contends that the district court erred in finding that his waiver of a jury trial was voluntarily, intelligently and knowingly made. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court’s colloquy was sufficient to support the finding. *See United States v. Christensen,*18 F.3d 822, 826 (9th Cir.1994).

Spangle also challenges the six-level enhancement for evidence of intent to carry out the threat. He did not object at the sentencing hearing to the district court’s use of the preponderance of the evidence standard to make the factual findings that supported his enhancement. Considering the totality of the circumstances, including the consideration that the resulting sentence was one that was less than double the initial Guidelines range, the enhancement did not have “an extremely disproportionate effect” on the sentence, and there was no error. *See United States v. Pike,*473 F.3d 1053, 1058-59 (9th Cir.2007). Further, there was no ineffective assistance of counsel in not arguing for the higher standard. *See United States v. Anderson,*850 F.2d 563, 565 (9th Cir.1988).

Spangle argues the evidence did not support the finding that Spangle had sufficient intent to carry out his threats and so did not justify the six-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2A6.1(b)(l). Section 2A6.1(b)(l) provides for a six-level enhancement if “the offense involved any conduct evidencing an intent to carry out” the threat for which he was convicted. It is a factual determination, however, whether Spangle’s conduct evidenced his intent to carry out his threats. *See United States v. Hines,*26 F.3d 1469, 1473 (9th Cir.1994). In light of the lists found in Spangle’s cell and the letters to the probation officer targeted in the list, the district court’s finding was not clearly erroneous. *See id.*

Spangle’s contention that the court could not sentence above the Guidelines range is premised on a misreading of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because Spangle threatened a federal probation officer, the maximum sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 876(c) was ten years, and he received only six.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### 752.7008 Use of Government facilities or personnel.

The following clause is for use in all USAID non-commercial contracts.

# Use of Government Facilities or Personnel (APR 1984)

(a) The Contractor and any employee or consultant of the Contractor is prohibited from using U.S. Government facilities (such as office space or equipment) or U.S. Government clerical or technical personnel in the performance of the services specified in the contract, unless the use of Government facilities or personnel is specifically authorized in the contract, or is authorized in advance, in writing, by the contracting officer.

(b) If at any time it is determined that the Contractor, or any of its employees or consultants have used U.S. Government facilities or personnel without authorization either in the contract itself, or in advance, in writing, by the contracting officer, then the amount payable under the contract shall be reduced by an amount equal to the value of the U.S. Government facilities or personnel used by the Contractor, as determined by the contracting officer.

(c) If the parties fail to agree on an adjustment made pursuant to this clause, it shall be considered a dispute, and shall be dealt with under the terms of the clause of this contract entitled “Disputes”.

(End of clause)

[49 FR 13259, Apr. 3, 1984, as amended at 62 FR 40470, July 29, 1997; 79 FR 74988, Dec. 16, 2014; 89 FR 4209, Jan. 23, 2024]
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(i)


CLARCOR INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        We hereby certify that the accompanying Report of CLARCOR Inc. on Form
10-Q for the six months ended May 28, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of CLARCOR Inc.



   June 16, 2005                           By  /s/ Norman E. Johnson
--------------------                           ---------------------------------
       (Date)                                          Norman E. Johnson
                                               Chairman of the Board, President
                                                  and Chief Executive Officer


   June 16, 2005                           By  /s/ Bruce A. Klein
--------------------                           ---------------------------------
       (Date)                                           Bruce A. Klein
                                                 Vice President - Finance and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
#### 604.7102 Contracting activity reviews.