alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10275 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for a 6 month delay 

before a final rule may take effect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 3, 2024 

Ms. HAGEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide for a 

6 month delay before a final rule may take effect. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulatory Cooling 

5 Off Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DELAY IN EFFECTIVE DATE OF RULES. 

7 Title 5, United States Code, is amended as follows: 

8 (1) In section 553— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 10275 IH

1 (A) in subsection (c), by inserting ‘‘, for a 

2 period of not less than 60 days,’’ before ‘‘inter3 ested persons’’; 

4 (B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘30 

5 days’’ and inserting ‘‘6 months’’; and 

6 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(f) The agency shall submit a finalized rule to Con8 gress for referral to each committee of jurisdiction in each 

9 House of Congress not later than 6 months prior to the 

10 effective date of the rule. 

11 ‘‘(g) The agency shall publish notice in the Federal 

12 Register on the date that a finalized rule takes effect. 

13 ‘‘(h) The agency shall post on the website of such 

14 agency a final rule or proposed rule not less than 24 hours 

15 before such final rule or proposed rule is published in the 

16 Federal Register pursuant to this section.’’. 

17 (2) In section 702, by adding at the end the fol18 lowing: ‘‘An action under this section may be 

19 brought before the district court where the plaintiff 

20 resides or before any court for a district where the 

21 agency has an office.’’. 

22 (3) In section 801— 

23 (A) in subsection (a)(1)(A), by inserting 

24 after ‘‘shall submit to each House of the Con25 gress’’ the following: ‘‘not later than the date 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 10275 IH

1 that is 6 months prior to the effective date of 

2 such rule’’; and 

3 (B) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘60 

4 days’’ and inserting ‘‘6 months (unless the Con5 gress enacts a joint resolution or other measure 

6 explicitly approving the rule)’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### KWIECHINSKI, Appellant, v. MOLESKI et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 23, 1906.)

Action by Jacob Kwiechinski, as, etc., against Andrew Moleski and others.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 21, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00271

- CV

ESTATE OF JOHNNIE MAE KING

,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar Co unty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001

- PC

- 12 63

Kelly Cross, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 16, 2015. The clerk’s and reporter’s records

have been filed. Appellant’s brief is currently past due, it was due July 20, 2015. On July 10, 2015, appellant filed a motion entitled “Motion to Abate or Dismiss Without Prejudice.” In the motion, appellant first states he is seeking an abatement of the appeal based on his contention

that “the Probate Court entered an erroneously dated order of dismissal on March 31, 2015, and has not yet ruled on motions and intervening circumstances that call upon it to formally declare whether or not it has jurisdiction . . . and whether or not the original order was final or mere ly interlocutory.” Appellant then goes on to state that if we should determine the order is interlocutory, he would prefer a dismissal without prejudice. It appears the bases set out in appellant’s motion for either abatement or dismissal concern the sub stance of his appeal. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion as filed.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 2, 2009
#### POLLARD, Appellant, v. WORTH, Respondt.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Sec d Department.

March 16, 1906.)

Action by Frederick E. Pollard against Lewis R. Worth.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed by default, without costs.
7.402 Acquisition methods. ( a ) *Purchase method.* ( 1 ) Generally, the purchase method is appropriate if the equipment will be used beyond the point in time when cumulative rental or leasing costs exceed the purchase costs.
( 2 ) Agencies should not rule out the purchase method of equipment acquisition in favor of renting or leasing merely because of the possibility that future technological advances might make the selected equipment less desirable.
( b ) *Rent or lease method.* ( 1 ) The rent or lease method is appropriate if it is to the Government's advantage under the circumstances. The rent or lease method may also serve as a short-term measure when the circumstances— ( i ) Require immediate use of equipment to meet program or system goals; but
( ii ) Do not currently support acquisition by purchase.
( 2 ) If a rent or lease method is justified, a rental or lease agreement with option to purchase is preferable.
( 3 ) Generally, a long term rental or lease agreement should be avoided, but may be appropriate if an option to purchase or other favorable terms are included.
( 4 ) If a rental or lease agreement with option to purchase is used, the contract shall state the purchase price or provide a formula which shows how the purchase price will be established at the time of purchase.
[50 FR 35475, Aug. 30, 1985, as amended at 59 FR 67026, Dec. 28, 1994; 86 FR 31072, June 10, 2021]
#### Merle Lefkowitz (Formerly Merle Bazar), Respondent, v. Sheila Grosswald, Individually and as Executrix of Lewis W. Bazar, Deceased, Appellant.

Order, entered on March 21, 1962, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
#### Henry Utpatel and Richard C. Mauer, trading as Utpatel & Mauer, appellees, v. Feliks Olczyk, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,600.

Action for commissions for procuring real estate loan. Order denying motion to vacate judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Harry B. Miller, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed May 25, 1926.

Rehearing denied June 7, 1926.

Kamfner, Horwitz, Halligan & Daniels, for appellant.

John T. Murray, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
809.406-270 Additional causes for debarment. ( a ) *Discretionary causes.* ( 1 ) In addition to the causes listed in FAR 9.406-2 (a) through (c), the SDO may debar contractors, based upon a preponderance of the evidence (as defined at FAR 2.101), for the Government's protection, for— ( i ) Any deliberate violation of the limitation on subcontracting clause requirements for acquisitions under subpart 819.70; or
( ii ) Failure to observe the material provisions of a voluntary exclusion or an administrative agreement.
( 2 ) The period of debarment shall be commensurate with the seriousness of the action.
( b ) *Statutory cause.* ( 1 ) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8127(g), Enforcement Penalties for Misrepresentation, the SDO shall debar, from contracting with VA, for a period of not less than five years, any business concern that has willfully and intentionally misrepresented the status of that concern as a small business concern owned and controlled by Veterans or as a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled Veterans.
( 2 ) Debarment of a business concern pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8127(g) shall include the debarment of all principals in the business concern. Debarment shall be for a period of not less than five years.
( 3 ) “Willful and intentional” misrepresentations, for the purpose of debarment actions taken pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8127(g), are defined as deliberate misrepresentations concerning the status of the concern as a small business concern owned and controlled by Veterans or as a small business concern owned and controlled by service-disabled Veterans as supported by the preponderance of evidence. Examples of a preponderance of evidence for deliberate misrepresentation of SDVOSB and/or VOSB status include but are not limited to: Criminal convictions, plea agreements, deferred prosecution agreements, Board of Contract Appeals decisions, and admissions of guilt.
#### Anna Bloch et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 14, 1977, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to set aside the verdict of the jury in favor of the defendants and "set down” the action for retrial. Order affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. During its deliberations in this negligence action the jury requested that all of the testimony of three major witnesses be read. The Trial Judge denied the request as "unreasonable” and "unfair” and .stressed that the jury should rely on its recollection, if possible. However, the court then repeated the instruction it gave during the charge, that the jury could request that any *part*of the testimony be read. The jury subsequently requested that all of the testimony of the plaintiff, one of the three major witnesses, be read. The Judge granted this request. Shortly thereafter the jury again contacted the Judge and stated that they were at an impasse and needed guidance. The jury finally returned a verdict for the defendants. Upon written motion the Trial Judge set aside the verdict on the ground that his failure to comply with the jury’s initial request to read the testimony of three of the witnesses constituted prejudicial error. In light of the uncertainty in the minds of the jurors, this court is of the opinion that the Trial Judge erred when he denied their request to rehear three of the witnesses’ testimony. Under the circumstances, the denial of the jury’s request was prejudicial error (see *Kerner v Surface Transp. Corp. of N. Y.,*
      *933266 App Div 356, affd 293 NY 881). This court will not disturb a decision by the Trial Judge to set aside a verdict and order a new trial because of an error which he made during the trial as long as he did not abuse his discretion in so doing (cf. *Robinson*v *Interurban St. Ry. Co.,*113 App Div 46). In light of our disposition herein, we do not pass on the other contentions raised on appeal. Suozzi, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
704.7004-1 Preaward requirements. ( a ) When USAID determines an acquisition to be subject to vetting, the contracting officer determines the appropriate stage of the acquisition cycle to require offerors to submit the completed USAID Partner Information Form, USAID Form 500-13, to the vetting official identified in the solicitation. The contracting officer must specify in the solicitation the stage at which the offerors will be required to submit the USAID Partner Information Form.
( b ) For negotiated procurements using (48 CFR) FAR part 15, this stage will typically be when the contracting officer establishes the competitive range (48 CFR 15.306(c)). However, the contracting officer may determine that vetting is more appropriate at a different stage of the source selection process, such as immediately prior to award, and then require only the apparently successful offeror to submit the completed USAID Partner Information Form.
( c ) For Indefinite Delivery contracts under (48 CFR) FAR subpart 16.5, vetting will occur prior to award of the basic contract if the contracting officer anticipates placing orders subject to vetting under that contract. Vetting will also occur before USAID places any orders subject to vetting. The contracting officer will notify awardees of the appropriate timing for vetting in the request for task or delivery order proposals. See (48 CFR) AIDAR subpart 716.5 for vetting procedures for task and delivery orders.
( d ) For all other acquisitions, including those under (48 CFR) FAR parts 13 and 14, the contracting officer determines the appropriate time to require potential awardee(s) to submit the completed USAID Partner Information Form to the vetting official.
( e ) Source selection proceeds separately from vetting. The source selection authority makes the source selection determination separately from the vetting process and without knowledge of vetting-related information other than that the apparently successful offeror has passed or not passed vetting.
( f ) The contracting officer may only award to an offeror who has passed vetting.
[77 FR 8170, Feb. 14, 2012, as amended at 79 FR 74988, Dec. 16, 2014]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 71 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 71

 Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on May 22, 
                                 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 14, 2023

    Mr. Crane (for himself, Mr. Gosar, Mrs. Boebert, and Mr. Gaetz) 
  submitted the following joint resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on May 22, 
                                 2003.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, pursuant to section 202 
of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national 
emergency declared by the finding of the President on May 22, 2003, in 
Executive Order 13303 is hereby terminated.
                                 <all>
```
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Combatting Discrimination Against AANHPI and MASSA Students      

# Resource: Combatting Discrimination Against AANHPI and MASSA Students

This policy fact sheet (PDF, 1 page) supports educators and community leaders as they work to protect all students, including Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) and Muslim, Arab, Sikh, and South Asian (MASSA) students, from discrimination and to create safe and supportive learning environments. 

http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/aanhpi-massa-factsheet-201606.pdf?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
#### 603.905 Procedures for investigating complaints.

The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 3.905.
# C_2017431EN.01000701.xml

| 15.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 December 2017

(2017/C 431/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1845 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,39 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4433 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88163 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,9488 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1686 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7783 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,695 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,07 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2220 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6330 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,5855 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5452 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5196 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,2499 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6934 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5950 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 288,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,9540 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8278 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5478 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 077,22 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8377 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,902 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,6190 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,505 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9529 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,6237 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,2465 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1845

JPY

Japanese yen

133,39

DKK

Danish krone

7,4433

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88163

SEK

Swedish krona

9,9488

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1686

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7783

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,695

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,07

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2220

RON

Romanian leu

4,6330

TRY

Turkish lira

4,5855

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5452

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5196

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,2499

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6934

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5950

KRW

South Korean won

1 288,74

ZAR

South African rand

15,9540

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8278

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5478

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 077,22

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8377

PHP

Philippine peso

59,902

RUB

Russian rouble

69,6190

THB

Thai baht

38,505

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9529

MXN

Mexican peso

22,6237

INR

Indian rupee

76,2465

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
----

----

| CLECO                POWER LLC | EXHIBIT                  32.4 |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|

|   Cleco                  Power LLC                                    |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| CERTIFICATION                  PURSUANT TO                                      |
| 18                  U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                        |
| AS                  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                         |
| SECTION                  906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF                  2002 |

| (1)                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                  or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                  material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |

| Date:  October                  31, 2007                                                                                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/  Kathleen                  F. Nolen                                                                                                                      |
| Kathleen                  F. Nolen                     Senior Vice President, Chief Financial                      Officer and Treasurer |

----

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

# Health for the World’s Adolescents

Developed by the World Health Organization, this interactive multimedia report provides a global overview of adolescents’ health and health-related behaviors and includes the latest data, trends, and determinants of adolescent health. The report also provides recommendations for creating adolescent-responsive health systems and responding to potential policy and programmatic issues. 

http://apps.who.int/adolescent/second-decade/?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal%20links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources