alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
46 So.2d 307

#### BEAUVAIS et al. v. D. C. HALL TRANSPORT, Inc., et al.

No. 39355.

April 24, 1950.

*393Garrett & Pleasant, Shreveport, and Robert A. Ainsworth, Jr., New Orleans, for defendants and appellant.

Max M. Morelock, New Orleans and Melvin F. Johnson, Shreveport, for plaintiffs-appellees.

HAMITER, Justice.

Plaintiffs, Earnest O. Beauvais, Doris N. Beauvais, Royal V. Young and Margaret C. Young, brought this suit to recover damages allegedly resulting from certain nuisances created and maintained by defendants in close proximity to their residences located in Bossier City. According to the petition each was damaged to the extent of $1500 through “inconvenience, discomfort, humiliation, worry, mental anguish, pain and suffering, and injury to health.” Additionally, Earnest O. Beauvais and Royal V. Young claimed damages of $5000 to the residential property of each because of depreciation in its market value.

The district court, after trial, rejected the demands for property damage. But it rendered judgment in favor of each plaintiff in the sum of $750 for (to quote from the judge’s assigned written reasons) “the damages claimed for inconvenience, discomfort, etc., as alleged in the petition % * *»

Defendants appealed. Plaintiffs have answered the appeal praying that the judgment be amended by increasing the personal injury awards to $1500 for each, as originally sought, and also by allowing the property damage claims.

Since all of the damages asserted herein arose out of the same circumstances and a part thereof is for physical injuries to the several plaintiffs, we are unable to entertain jurisdiction of the appeal. Section 10 of Article 7 of the Louisiana Constitution provides that the Supreme Court “ * * * shall have appellate jurisdiction in civil suits where the amount in dispute *395* * * shall exceed two thousand dollars exclusive of interest, except in suits for damages for physical injuries to, or for the death of a person, or for other damages sustained by such person or his heirs or legal representatives, arising out of the same circumstances; * *

In the recent case of Sibley et al. v. Petty Realty Company, Inc., et al., 215 La. 597, 41 So.2d 230, 231, which presented a damage claim for physical and other injuries we considered the quoted constitutional provision and observed: “Inasmuch as a portion of plaintiffs’ claim is for damages for physical injuries, i. e., the illness of Mrs. Sibley and her children allegedly resulting from defendants’ act, it seems manifest that the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, is vested with appellate jurisdiction under Section 29 of Article VII of the Constitution.”

For the same reason we are declining today jurisdiction of the appeal in the case of Kirkwood v. McFarland, 217 La. 386, 46 So.2d 307.

For the reasons assigned it is ordered that this case be transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 19 of 1912, the record to he filed in such court by appellants within thirty days from the date on which this decree shall become final; otherwise, the appeal shall stand dismissed.

PONDER, J., absent.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Bullying at Colleges and Universities      

# Bullying at Colleges and Universities

This publication from the Department of Education’s Higher Education Center highlights the prevalence of bullying within college-age youth and the policies and programs universities are putting in place to combat it. 

http://higheredcenter.ed.gov/files/prevention_updates/january2012.pdf
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of PCS Edventures!.com , Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Anthony A. Maher, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    Date:June 30, 2008By:/s/Anthony A. MaherAnthony A. MaherPresident and CEO
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 87/2019

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 87 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 627 marca 2019 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 87

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 627 marca 2019

---

| Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | Sprostowania |
| 2019/C 87/01 | Sprostowanie do Umowy między państwami członkowskimi Unii Europejskiej, zebranymi w Radzie, w sprawie ochrony informacji niejawnych wymienianych w interesie Unii Europejskiej, podpisanej w Brukseli w dniu 25 maja 2011 r.( Dz.U. C 202 z 8.7.2011 ) | 1 |

Spis treśći

Strona

Sprostowania

2019/C 87/01

Sprostowanie do Umowy między państwami członkowskimi Unii Europejskiej, zebranymi w Radzie, w sprawie ochrony informacji niejawnych wymienianych w interesie Unii Europejskiej, podpisanej w Brukseli w dniu 25 maja 2011 r.( Dz.U. C 202 z 8.7.2011 )

( Dz.U. C 202 z 8.7.2011 )

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

Sprostowania

| 7.3.2019 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | C 87/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2019

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

C 87/1

---

Sprostowanie do Umowy między państwami członkowskimi Unii Europejskiej, zebranymi w Radzie, w sprawie ochrony informacji niejawnych wymienianych w interesie Unii Europejskiej, podpisanej w Brukseli w dniu 25 maja 2011 r.

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 202 z 8 lipca 2011 r.
  )

(2019/C 87/01)

Strona 15, formuła końcowa, data

zamiast:

„Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia czwartego maja dwa tysiące jedenastego roku.”,

powinno być:

„Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia dwudziestego piątego maja dwa tysiące jedenastego roku.”.

---
#### 53.110 Continuation sheets.

Except as may be otherwise indicated in the FAR, all standard forms prescribed by the FAR may be continued on (a) plain paper of similar specification, or (b) specially constructed continuation sheets (e.g., OF 336). Continuation sheets shall be annotated in the upper right-hand corner with the reference number of the document being continued and the serial page number.

[48 FR 42637, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 27121, July 29, 1986]
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 9535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1059 (Third Review)]


Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on hand trucks 
and certain parts thereof from China would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on July 1, 2020 (85 FR 39584) 
and determined on October 5, 2020 that it would conduct an expedited 
review (86 FR 2001, January 11, 2021).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on February 9, 2021. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5159 (February 2021), 
entitled Hand Trucks and Certain Parts Thereof from China: 
Investigation No. 731-TA-1059 (Third Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 9, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-02975 Filed 2-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           National Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues      

# National Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues

National Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues provides consultation, training, and technical assistance on all legal and judicial aspects of the child welfare system, including federal law, court improvement, agency and court collaboration, permanency planning, legal representation, and other emerging child welfare issues. The Resource Center, funded by the Children’s Bureau, is comprised of the American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law, the National Center for State Courts, and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.

http://www.americanbar.org/groups/child_law/what_we_do/projects/rclji.html
#### 601.404 Class deviations.

The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 1.404(a).

[53 FR 26159, July 11, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 66751, Dec. 28, 1994]
#### 819.507 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
#### In the Matter of Mabel E. Britton, as Executrix of George H. Britton, Deceased, Petitioner, v. State Tax Commission, *Respondent.*

*Per Curiam.*

In an article 78 [Civ. Prac. Act] proceeding transferred here for initial determination by an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term petitioner seeks to review and annul a determination of the State Tax Commission which sustained assessments of unincorporated business taxes pursuant to article 16-A of the Tax Law against her deceased husband for the years 1954 and 1955. Deceased’s earnings accrued from sales commissions derived from activities as the exclusive manufacturer’s representative of 11 non-competing corporations *988within an area principally comprising the State of New York with the exception of New York City; he classified his occupation as that of a sales engineer; the principals exercised no supervision or control in respect to the manner in which his sales endeavors were pursued requiring only successful results; none of the several corporations paid unemployment insurance or social security on his earnings or deducted withholding taxes therefrom; deceased paid his own travel and incidental expenses for which he was not reimbursed; in personal income tax returns which he filed for the years in question he deducted expenses incurred in the maintenance of an office in his home. The sole fact that a person is a multi-line salesman is an insufficient basis to deem him engaged in an unincorporated business. To hold the salesman so engaged, it must be found that (a) he maintains an office, or (b) employs one or more assistants or (c) otherwise regularly carries on a business. The scope of our inquiry is restricted to the question whether upon the record presented the determination is clearly erroneous as a matter of law. *(Matter of Harte*v. *Chapman,*283 App. Div. 551, mot. for lv. to app. den. 307 N. Y. 941; *People ex rel. Hull*v. *Graves,*289 N. Y. 173, 177.) We find such not to be the case here. Determination confirmed, without costs. Giibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Pernice, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the County Court, Nassau County, both imposed September 15, 1978, upon his convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Indictment No. 47272) and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (Indictment No. 47273), upon his pleas of guilty, the sentences being concurrent terms of imprisonment of three years to life and one year, respectively. Sentences modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the minimum term of imprisonment under *736Indictment No. 47272 to one year. As so modified, sentences affirmed. The sentence under Indictment No. 47272 was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Suozzi, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
#### ROZETT, Appellant, v. ZETTERBERG, R spondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Divisioi Second Department.

March 2, 1906.)

Actiij by William E. Rozett against Herman Zette berg.

No opinion. Judgment of the Municip! Court affirmed, with costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jack Phonveille, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the *815Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March. 25, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of violations of article 33 of the Public Health Law (relating to narcotic drugs) and imposing sentence upon him' as a multiple narcotic offender, pursuant to statute-(Penal Law, §§ 1751, 1751-a). Judgment reversed on the law, and new trial granted. The findings of fact implicit in the jury’s verdict have not been considered. In view of the facts and circumstances here presented, we are of the opinion that the trial court committed reversible error by limiting defendant’s exercise of his constitutional right to cross-examine a witness who had testified against him. On cross-examination of such a witness, the defendant should be given wide scope in probing his credibility with respect to the most relevant issue in the case *(People*v. *Ramistella,*306 N. Y. 379; *People*v. *Barca,*9 A D 2d 920). This error was further aggravated by the obvious lack of candor on the part of the witness, who was a police officer. The District Attorney has joined in the request for a reversal of the judgment and a new trial. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Babin, JJ.. concur.
# C_2021178EN.01000101.xml

| 10.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

7 May 2021

(2021/C 178/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2059 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4361 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86810 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1263 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0963 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,0125 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,682 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 358,01 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5754 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,9265 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 10,0019 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5523 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4689 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3661 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6730 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6061 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 350,52 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,1863 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7809 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5345 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 208,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9587 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,747 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 89,4671 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,588 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3801 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,2006 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 88,6375 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2059

JPY

Japanese yen

131,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4361

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86810

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1263

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0963

ISK

Iceland króna

150,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,0125

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,682

HUF

Hungarian forint

358,01

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5754

RON

Romanian leu

4,9265

TRY

Turkish lira

10,0019

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5523

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4689

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3661

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6730

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6061

KRW

South Korean won

1 350,52

ZAR

South African rand

17,1863

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7809

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5345

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 208,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9587

PHP

Philippine peso

57,747

RUB

Russian rouble

89,4671

THB

Thai baht

37,588

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3801

MXN

Mexican peso

24,2006

INR

Indian rupee

88,6375

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
727.7000 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This part prescribes the policies, procedures, and a contract clause pertaining to data and digital information management. It implements the following requirements: ( 1 ) Digital Accountability and Transparency (DATA) Act of 2014;
( 2 ) Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act (“Evidence Act”) of 2018;
( 3 ) 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (21st Century IDEA Act);
( 4 ) Foreign Aid Transparency and Accountability (FATAA) Act of 2016;
( 5 ) Geospatial Data Act of 2018;
( 6 ) OMB Circular A-130.
( b ) [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6694

WALTER E. PATTERSON, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-696-3) Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Walter E. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Walter E. Patterson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Patterson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Patterson v. Angelone , No. CA-99-696-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED