alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
8.605 Exceptions. Purchase from FPI is not mandatory and a waiver is not required if— ( a ) ( 1 ) The contracting officer makes a determination that the FPI item of supply is not comparable to supplies available from the private sector that best meet the Government's needs in terms of price, quality, and time of delivery; and
( 2 ) The item is acquired in accordance with 8.602(a)(4);
( b ) Public exigency requires immediate delivery or performance;
( c ) Suitable used or excess supplies are available;
( d ) The supplies are acquired and used outside the United States;
( e ) Acquiring listed items totaling $3,500 or less;
( f ) Acquiring items that FPI offers exclusively on a competitive (non-mandatory) basis, as identified in the FPI Schedule; or
( g ) Acquiring services.
[69 FR 16149, Mar. 26, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 18958, Apr. 11, 2005; 71 FR 223, Jan. 3, 2006; 73 FR 53994, Sept. 17, 2008; 81 FR 45855, July 14, 2016]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stephen Riccardo, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered July 17, 1975, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, plea vacated, and case remanded to Criminal Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. Almost immediately after entering his guilty plea, the defendant complained to his attorney that he was not guilty and that he had been confused. Because the court was engaged in other matters defendant’s attorney advised the defendant to return the next morning. At that time defendant’s attorney made an application to withdraw the plea. He advised the court that he had consulted with the defendant for only 30 seconds prior to the plea and that immediately after the plea the defendant appeared confused and proclaimed his innocence. In the circumstances of this case it was improper to deny the defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea. Of primary significance is the undisputed allegation that he conferred with counsel for only 30 seconds. In addition, it is noteworthy that the defendant has no prior criminal record and that there were no criminal proceedings in this case between the arraignment and the plea hearing. It must, therefore, be inferred that the defendant was unschooled in the nature of the criminal justice system. Also of significance is the timeliness of the defendant’s application. Rather than denying the defendant’s application, the court should have allowed the defendant the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea (see *People v Nixon,*21 NY2d 338, cert den 393 US 1067; *People v McClain,*32 NY2d 697). Damiani, J. P., Suozzi, Lazer and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Increasing Adolescent Immunization Coverage      

# Resource: Increasing Adolescent Immunization Coverage

This online course, developed by members of the National HPV Vaccination Roundtable, will equip participants to describe the importance of the HPV vaccine, implement the “same way, same day” approach to HPV vaccination, and answer patients’ and families’ questions accurately and succinctly. This resource is specifically designed for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, nurses, and pharmacists engaged in the care of adolescents needing vaccinations. 

http://www.cmeuniversity.com/course/disclaimer/114605?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resource#01
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James J. Smith, Jr., Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed August 14, 1978. Sentence affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Gulotta, J. P., Shapiro, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           American Indian and Alaska Native Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions Are More Likely Than Other Admissions to Report Alcohol Abuse      

# American Indian and Alaska Native Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions Are More Likely Than Other Admissions to Report Alcohol Abuse

A report released by SAMHSA reveals that about one-third of American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) who are admitted to substance abuse treatment report alcohol abuse, while only about one-fifth of all other races give similar reports. Additionally, a higher percentage of AI/ANs begin using alcohol or drugs at age 11 or younger.

http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/TEDS-Spot146-AIAN-2014/TEDS-Spot146-AIAN-2014.pdf?utm_source=Find%20Youth%20Info&utm_medium=Federal%20Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
915.404-2 Information to support proposal analysis. ( a ) (1) Field pricing assistance as discussed in 48 CFR 15.404-2(a) is not required for the negotiation of DOE contract prices or modifications thereof. The term “field pricing assistance” refers to the Department of Defense (DOD) system for obtaining a price and/or cost analysis report from a cognizant DOD field level contract management office wherein requests for the review of a proposal submitted by an offeror are initiated and the recommendations made by the various specialists of the management office are consolidated into a single report that is forwarded to the office making the contract award for use in conducting negotiations. In the DOE, such review activities, except for reviews performed by professional auditors, are expected to be accomplished by pricing support personnel located in DOE Contracting Activities. The DOE contracting officer shall formally request the assistance of appropriate pricing support personnel, other than auditors, for the review of any proposal that exceeds the threshold stated at 48 CFR 15.403-4(a)(1), unless the contracting officer has sufficient data to determine the reasonableness of the proposed cost or price. Such pricing support may be requested for proposals below the threshold stated at 48 CFR 15.403-4(a)(1), if considered necessary for the establishment of a reasonable pricing arrangement. Contracting officers, however, are not precluded by this section from requesting pricing assistance from a cognizant DOD contract management office, provided an appropriate cross-servicing arrangement for pricing support services exists between the DOE and the servicing agency.
( c ) ( 1 ) When an audit is required pursuant to 915.404-2-70, “Audit as an aid in proposal analysis,” the request for audit shall be sent directly to the Federal audit office assigned cognizance of the offeror or prospective contractor. When the cognizant agency is other than the Defense Contract Audit Agency or the Department of Health and Human Services, and an appropriate interagency agreement has not been established, the need for audit assistance shall be coordinated with the Office of Policy, within the Headquarters procurement organization.
( 2 ) ( i ) The request for audit shall establish the due date for receipt of the auditor's report and in so doing shall allow as much time as possible for the auditor's review.
( ii ) Copies of technical analysis reports prepared by DOE technical or other pricing support personnel shall not normally be provided to the auditor. The contracting officer or the supporting price, cost, or financial analyst at the contracting activity shall determine the monetary impact of the technical findings.
[63 FR 56851, Oct. 23, 1998, as amended at 74 FR 36363, July 22, 2009; 76 FR 7692, 7693, Feb. 11, 2011]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2015

No. 04-15-00271-CV

ESTATE OF JOHNNIE MAE KING,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2001-PC-1263

Kelly Cross, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 16, 2015. The clerk’s and reporter’s records 

have been filed. Appellant’s brief is currently past due, it was due July 20, 2015. On July 10, 

2015, appellant filed a motion entitled “Motion to Abate or Dismiss Without Prejudice.” In the 

motion, appellant first states he is seeking an abatement of the appeal based on his contention 

that “the Probate Court entered an erroneously dated order of dismissal on March 31, 2015, and 

has not yet ruled on motions and intervening circumstances that call upon it to formally declare 

whether or not it has jurisdiction . . . and whether or not the original order was final or merely 

interlocutory.” Appellant then goes on to state that if we should determine the order is 

interlocutory, he would prefer a dismissal without prejudice. It appears the bases set out in 

appellant’s motion for either abatement or dismissal concern the substance of his appeal. 

Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion as filed.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### LEWIS, Appellant, v. DELAWARE, L. & W. R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 10, 1906.)

Action by Sarah J. Lewis against the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Company.

No oninion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
LESAMUEL PALMER, 

Appellant, 

v. 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 

CASE NO. 1D16-5683 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________/ 

Opinion filed May 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County. 

Mark W. Moseley, Judge. 

Lesamuel Palmer, pro se, Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

WOLF, RAY, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****OWM accomplishments report**
 
2006 | 2007| 2008
 
SuDoc Number:EP 2.48:
Item Number:0473-A-36 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000966196
 
November 27, 2018
#### Rochelle Green et al., Respondents, v. Ann Geluso, Appellant.

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the verdict vacated and a new trial granted, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff Rochelle Green stipulates to accept $4,500 in -lieu of the verdict in her favor and plaintiff Sonya iStrauss accepts $7,500 in lieu of the verdict in her favor, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and is affirmed as thus modified, without costs and without disbursements. It is evident that the amount of the jury’s verdict is grossly excessive and that any award in excess of the amounts indicated is not warranted by the record. Settle order on notice. Concur — Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and MoNally, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     3,580
<RECEIVABLES>                                  424,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,134
<INVENTORY>                                     11,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               543,456
<PP&E>                                       5,560,648
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,913,146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,245,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          580,093
<BONDS>                                        946,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       873,685
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,245,324
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,612,604
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,167,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                397,559
<INCOME-TAX>                                   151,261
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            246,298
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   246,298
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                               EXHIBIT 12

                                              AEP TEXAS CENTRAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                    Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                                   (in thousands except ratio data)

<CAPTION>

                                                                                                  Twelve
                                                                                                  Months
                                                             Year Ended December 31,              Ended
                                                  1998      1999      2000      2001     2002     3/31/03
<S>                                            <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Earnings:
  Income Before Extraordinary Item and
    Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change     $161,511  $187,718  $189,567  $184,787   $275,941  $315,933
  Plus Federal Income Taxes                     126,738    83,508    80,797   174,073     30,102    62,365
  Plus State Income Taxes                          -         -        3,532    14,849      3,616   (10,112)
  Plus Provision for Deferred Income Taxes       (8,328)   19,938    16,263   (72,568)   113,655   119,543
  Plus Deferred Investment Tax Credits           (3,858)   (5,207)   (5,207)   (5,207)    (5,207)   (5,207)
  Plus Fixed Charges                            124,807   118,911   132,785   125,194    132,236   131,826

    Total Earnings                             $400,870  $404,868  $417,737  $421,128   $550,343  $614,348

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on Long-term Debt                   $ 93,301  $ 87,413  $ 96,212  $ 86,980   $ 99,839* $105,355*
  Interest on Short-term Debt                    19,506    19,498    22,830    25,023     19,442*   13,516*
  Distributions on Trust Preferred Securities    12,000    12,000    11,940    11,208     10,560    10,560
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals      -         -        1,803     1,983      2,395     2,395

     Fixed Charges                             $124,807  $118,911  $132,785  $125,194   $132,236  $131,826

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                 3.21      3.40      3.14      3.36       4.16      4.66

* Certain  amounts have been  reclassified  between  interest on short-term  and
long-term   debt   compared   to  periods   prior  to  January  1,  2002.   This
reclassification had no affect on the ratio.

</TABLE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           New Service Delivery Opportunities for Individuals with a Substance Use Disorder      

# New Service Delivery Opportunities for Individuals with a Substance Use Disorder

CMS issued guidance to states regarding opportunities to design service delivery systems for individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) (PDF, 15 pages), including an opportunity for demonstration projects approved under section 1115 of the Social Security Act to ensure that a continuum of care is available to individuals with SUD.

http://www.medicaid.gov/federal-policy-guidance/downloads/SMD15003.pdf?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources