alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dina KANG, Petitioner, v. Peter D. KEISLER,* Acting Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-72820.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2007 **.

Filed Nov. 1, 2007.

James W. Moore, Esq., Law Offices of James W. Moore, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Earle B. Wilson, Esq., Leslie McKay Fax, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KLEINFELD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,*** Judge.

*

 Peter D. Keisler is substituted for his predecessor, Alberto R. Gonzales, as Acting Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

***

 The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

*641MEMORANDUM ****

Dina Kang has appealed the denial of her asylum petition.

The evidence Kang presented does not compel a finding of past persecution. Although Kang has suffered harassment and discrimination, the adversities she has suffered do not rise to the level of “persecution.” 1

The evidence also does not compel a finding of well-founded fear of future persecution. Although Kang credibly testified that she subjectively genuinely feared persecution, she must also show credible, specific evidence that support a reasonable fear of persecution. To do this, Kang could show either “a pattern or practice of persecution of people similarly situated”2 or that she “is a member of a disfavored group coupled with a showing that she, in particular, is likely to be targeted as a member of that group.”3 Kang’s evidence may support a likelihood of harassment and discrimination similar to what she suffered before, but there is no evidence to show that her fear of future “persecution” is well founded.

PETITION DENIED.

****

 jj-,¡s disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. *See Fisher v. INS,*79 F.3d 955, 961 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc).

2

. *See Knezevic v. Ashcroft,*367 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir.2004).

3

. *See Sael v. Ashcroft,*386 F.3d 922, 925 (9th Cir.2004).
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           CrimeSolutions.gov      

# CrimeSolutions.gov

CrimeSolutions.gov uses rigorous research to inform practitioners and policy makers about what works in criminal justice, juvenile justice, and crime victim services

http://www.crimesolutions.gov
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries V, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

February 12, 2009
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Parent Guide: A Chair for Mother      

# Parent Guide: A Chair for Mother

This guide will help parents teach their child money management skills while reading “A Chair for my Mother” by Vera Williams. 

https://www.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_book-club_chair-for-my-mother.pdf
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Thursday, February 25, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

Virtual hearing. Note: Because of the covid-19 pandemic, we will conduct the hearing virtually. If you would like to access the hearing, see the instructions below.

# STATUS:

                        This hearing will be open to the public. To access the virtual hearing, go to the commission's website                         *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the hearing page.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Repayment Hearing: Jill Stein for President.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer. Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Laura E. Sinram,

Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2021-03692 Filed 2-18-21; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### 819.811 Preparing the contracts.
(115 App. Div. 171)

#### PEOPLE *ex*rel. COLLINS v. AHEARN, President of Borough of Manhattan.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 19, 1906.

Mandamus—Alternative Writ—Condition on Awarding Writ.

Where, in, mandamus to compel the reinstatement of relator in a municipal office, his petition entitled him to an alternative writ, the court did not have power to attach a condition that he should waive all claims for back salary in case of ultimate success.

Appeal from Special Term, New York County.

Mandamus by the people on relation of James G. Collins to compel John F. Ahearn, as president of the borough of Manhattan of the city of New York to reinstate relator in the office of chief of the bureau of highways in the borough of Manhattan. From an order denying an application for a peremptory writ and directing that an alternative writ issue on condition that relator waive all claims to back salary, relator appeals. Modified and affirmed.

Argued before O’BRIEN, P. J., and INGRAHAM, CLARKE, HOUGHTON, and SCOTT, JJ.

John W. Browne, for relator.

William B. Crowell, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The peremptory writ of mandamus was properly denied.

If the relator’s petition entitled him to an alternative writ, we do not think the court had the power to attach the condition that he should waive all claims for back salary in case of ultimate success. The defendant has not appealed from the order granting the alternative writ. The order must therefore stand, but be modified by striking therefrom the provision as to waiver of back salary, and as so modified affirmed, without costs in this court to either party.

By this decision we do not assume to pass upon relator’s rights, or to change in any manner our ruling in People ex rel. Michaels v. Ahearn as President, etc. (Sup.). 98 N. Y. Supp. 492.
89–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 111–520 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII 

WITH RESPECT TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES 

JUNE 30, 2010.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. CARDOZA, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1496] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1496, by a non-record vote, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any resolution reported through the legislative day of July 3, 2010. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with HEARING
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Federal Reserve's Attachment to the Free Reserve Concept

              																	Brunner, Karl, 1916-1989					,	Meltzer, Allan H.					,	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency. Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, 1964-1975					 and 	Eighty-Third Congress, 1953-1955. 						*Federal Reserve's Attachment to the Free Reserve Concept : A Staff Analysis, 88th Congress, 2d Session*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										May 7, 1964,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/396,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
No. 89-5448.

#### Groff *v.*Hummer et al.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
### Eligible applicants include:

      - institutions of higher education (IHEs), 
      - local education agencies (LEAs), 
      - nonprofit organizations, 
      - state education agencies (SEAs), and 
      - other organizations and/or agencies.

### In addition to the categories above:

      - public charter schools that are LEAs under state law, 
      - other public agencies, 
      - private nonprofit organizations, 
      - for-profit organizations, 
      - outlying areas (American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands), 
      - freely associated states, and 
      - Indian tribes or tribal organizations.
#### Nita Robinson v. City of New York.

Motion to dispense with printing denied, with leave to renew upon proper papers. (See CPLR, art. 11.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Tálente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Exhibit 12-A




                CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

              COMPUTATIONS OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Nine Months Ended
                                                        September 30,
                                                         (Unaudited)
                                                     -------------------
                                                     1996          1995
                                                     ----          ----
                                                     (dollars in millions)
<S>                                                 <C>            <C>
Net Earnings before cumulative effect
      of changes in accounting principles           $    293       $    242
      Add back:
         Taxes on income                                 160            132
         Fixed charges                                   616            693
                                                    --------       --------

           Earnings available for fixed charges     $  1,069       $  1,067
                                                    ========       ========

      Fixed charges:
         Interest expense                           $    605       $    681
         Rent                                             11             12
                                                    --------       --------

           Total fixed charges                      $    616       $    693
                                                    ========       ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                      1.74           1.54
                                                    ========       ========
</TABLE>


The ratios of earnings to fixed charges have been computed by dividing
earnings before income taxes and fixed charges by fixed charges. Fixed charges
consist of interest, amortization of debt discount and expense, and rentals.
Rentals included in fixed charges are the portion of total rent expense
representative of the interest factor (deemed to be one-third).
#### Mamie Fleet, administratrix of the estate of Moses Fleet, deceased, appellee, v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,652.

Action for personal injury. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kafikakee county; the Hon. Arthur W. DeSelm, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1926.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 5, 1926.

Hunter & Minor, for appellant; John G. Drennan, of counsel.

Frank J. Burns and James T. Burns, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Jones

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION BY
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Wellesley-Wesley, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chyron Corporation (the "registrant") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "report");



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date: August 7, 2003







|/s/ Michael Wellesley-Wesley
|----------------------------
|Michael Wellesley-Wesley    
|President and               
|Chief Executive Officer
570.106 Advertising, publicizing, and notifications to Congress. ( a ) If a proposed acquisition is not exempt under FAR 5.202 or GSAR 570.106(e), and is for a leasehold interest in real property estimated to exceed 10,000 square feet, then the contracting officer must publicize the proposed acquisition in the System for Award Management Contract Opportunities at *https://www.sam.gov ”*.
( b ) For leasehold acquisitions where the solicitation requires the construction of a new building on a preselected site, the contracting officer, in accordance with the timeframes established in FAR 5.203, must publicize the proposed acquisition in the GPE regardless of size or value.
( c ) For leasehold acquisitions not subject to a square foot measurement (e.g., antennas, piers, parking), contracting officers must publicize the proposed acquisition in the GPE when the contract action is expected to exceed $25,000, unless an exception under FAR 5.202 applies.
( d ) Other than as identified in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section, the contracting officer need not publicize the proposed acquisition of a leasehold interest in real property, including expansion requests within the scope of a lease (see 570.403), lease extensions under the conditions defined in 570.405, and building alterations within the scope of a lease (see 570.5). However, the contracting officer may publicize proposed lease acquisitions of any dollar value or square footage in the GPE or local newspapers if, in the opinion of the contracting officer, doing so is necessary to promote competition.
( e ) The contracting officer may issue a consolidated advertisement for multiple leasing actions.
( f ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, where publicizing of the proposed acquisition is required, the notice shall be published in the GPE not less than three calendar days prior to issuance of a solicitation.
( g ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section and as set forth in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this section, the contracting officer shall provide offerors not less than 20 calendar days between solicitation issuance and the date established for receipt of initial offers. ( 1 ) For a proposed acquisition using simplified lease acquisition procedures (see 570.2), consider the individual acquisition and establish a reasonable response time.
( 2 ) In cases of unusual and compelling urgency (FAR 6.303-2), provide as much time as reasonably possible under the circumstances and document the contract file.
( h ) If a Member of Congress has specifically requested notification of award, the contracting officer must provide award notifications in accordance with 505.303.
[76 FR 30849, May 27, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 38337, June 26, 2020; 86 FR 48915, Sept. 1, 2021]