alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         722,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,371,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,179,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   248,000
<INVENTORY>                                    591,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,982,000
<PP&E>                                     100,480,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,308,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,695,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,213,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,196,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,057,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               141,695,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,450,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,357,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             770,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,671,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   652,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,019,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,019,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Intensive Parole Model for High-Risk Juvenile Offenders      

# Intensive Parole Model for High-Risk Juvenile Offenders

This report discusses results from Washington state's adoption of OJJDP's Intensive Aftercare Program regarding recidivism as well as steps for moving forward.

http://www.dshs.wa.gov/sites/default/files/SESA/legislative/documents/Intenisve%20Parole%20Legislative%20Report%20-%202012.pdf
#### Michael Lardiere, Respondent, v Choices Womens Medical Center, Inc., Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 844]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated May 16, 2003, as denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the plaintiffs first cause of action, and (2) an order of the same court dated August 21, 2003, as denied its motion for leave to renew.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, it failed to show that, as a matter of law, the object of the contract in question was illegal, and, as a result, the plaintiff could not seek the aid of the court in enforcing it. Accordingly, the defendant did not show that the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action *(see*CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; *Empire Magnetic Imaging v Comprehensive Care of N.Y.,*271 AD2d 472, 477-481 [2000] [Krausman, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part]; *United Calendar Mfg. Corp. v Huang,*94 AD2d 176, 180-181 [1983]; *see also Gjonlekaj v Sot,*308 AD2d 471, 473 [2003]; *Well v Yeshiva Rambam,*300 AD2d 580 [2002]; *cf. Matter of Ungar v Matarazzo Blumberg & Assoc.,*260 AD2d 485 [1999]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
(May 3, 1962)

#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Marie Spanner, as Administratrix of the Estate of William Spanner, Deceased, Respondent. Albert H. Treiman, Appellant.

Decree, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs to all parties filing briefs payable out of the estate. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, McNally and Eager, JJ.
**Exhibit 31**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, William J. Carden, certify that:

1)               I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of American Spectrum Realty, Inc.;

2)               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4)               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)               designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)              evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)               disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;

5)               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions);

a)               all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  March 15, 2006

|        | By:    | /s/ WILLIAM J.  CARDEN             |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------|
|   |   | William J. Carden                  |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer and Acting |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer            |

 

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Proper Drug Disposal Quiz      

# Resource: Proper Drug Disposal Quiz

This quiz tests young people’s knowledge about proper medication and drug disposal. **Learn more.**
#### REYNOLDS, Respondent, v. NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 16, 1906.)

Action by James L. Reynolds against the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company.

No opinion. Order denying motion for new trial affirmed, with costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Venroy Francis, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 882]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered December 20, 1999, convicting him of rape in the first degree (three counts) and sodomy in the first degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions that the evidence was legally insufficient to support the conviction either are unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995]) or without merit *(see People v Thompson,*72 NY2d 410, 415-416 [1988]). Insofar as the contentions are unpreserved for *810appellate review, we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(see*CPL 470.15 [3] [c]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]). Smith, J.P., H. Miller, S. Miller and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Impact of Behavioral Health Conditions and Treatment on Older Adolescents and Young Adults      

# Impact of Behavioral Health Conditions and Treatment on Older Adolescents and Young Adults

This news release describes a report from SAMHSA that reveals that older adolescents and young adults with emotional and behavioral health conditions are much more likely to have significant problems with school performance, employment, and housing stability—demonstrating the critical need for treatment and services for this population. 

http://www.samhsa.gov/newsroom/press-announcements/201405060145
a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 11, 2008
    /s/ John A. MorrisseyJohn A. MorrisseyChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      December 2, 2009 | /S/      JAMES P. FOGARTY     |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                         | James      P. Fogarty         |
|                         | President                     |
|                         | Chief      Executive Officer  |
|                         |                          |
| Dated:      December 2, 2009 | /S/      ERIC M. SPECTER      |
|                         | Eric      M. Specter          |
|                         | Executive      Vice President |
|                         | Chief      Financial Officer  |

----
#### The National Cash Register Company, appellee, v. Clyde W. Riley Advertising System and Bernard W. Snow, bailiff, appellants.

Gem Nos. 31,041 and 31,042.

Proceeding for trial of right of property. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Philip J. Finnegan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the March term, 1926.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 5, 1926.

William R. Wiley, for appellants.

Meads *&*Scott, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### John W. Schroff, Appellant, v. Kesbec, Inc., Defendant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff. Peter J. Gray, Third-Party Defendant.

In an action to recover damages for .personal injury, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered October 9, 1963 after a jury trial, in favor of the defendant, dismissing the complaint on the merits at the close of plaintiff’s case. Judgment affirmed, with costs *(Figler*v. *Subin,*18 A D 2d 702, affd. 14 N Y 2d 740; cf. *De Clara*v. *Barber S. S. Lines,*309 N. Y. 620; *Leskody*v. *Atlantic Stevedoring Co.,*21 A D 2d 894). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chicago Rivet & Machine
Co. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John A. Morrissey, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John A. Morrissey
---------------------
Name: John A. Morrissey
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  May 9, 2005

                                       17
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7710

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WALTER EUGENE HOFFMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-94-132, CA-97-608-R)

Submitted: August 31, 1998 Decided: September 21, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Eugene Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Hoffman, Nos. CR-94-132; CA-97-608-R (W.D.

Va. Sept. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Eugene Lloyd, Appellant, v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered November 1, 1961, after a hearing, which dismissed the writ and remanded him to the custody of respondent. Order affirmed. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., 'concur.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES ) No. ACM 21046

Appellee )

)

v. )

) ORDER

Brian G. NASH )

Staff Sergeant (E-5) )

U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Panel 2

On 3 December 2021, Appellant submitted a Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Attach Document. Specifically, Appellant moved to attach

DD Form 2330, Waiver/Withdrawal of Appellate Rights in General and Special 

Courts-Martial Subject to Review by a Court of Criminal Appeals, signed by

Appellant and Appellant’s counsel. However, on page one of the form, in the 

last paragraph, Appellant neglected to cross out “waive my rights to appellate 

review.” As Appellant’s case is docketed with our court, we find Appellant’s 

intent is to “withdraw” from appellate review and Appellant’s failure to cross 

out the inapplicable language was merely an oversight. On 6 December 2021, 

the Government requested we grant Appellant’s motion.

Accordingly, it is by the court on this 9th day of December, 2021,

ORDERED:

Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw from Appellate Review and Attach Document is GRANTED. Appellant’s case is forwarded to the Appellate Records 

Branch, AFLOA/JAJM, for further processing in accordance with Rules for 

Courts-Martial 1115(f)(3) and 1201, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States

(2019 ed.).

FOR THE COURT

NATALIA A. ESCOBAR, Capt, USAF

Deputy Clerk of the Court