53640 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA–27– 

064, dated December 11, 2012. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 CoˆteVertu Road West, Dorval, Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, 

Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514– 

855–7401; email thd.crj@

aero.bombardier.com; Internet http://

www.bombardier.com. 

(4) You may review copies of the service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 

9, 2013. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–20237 Filed 8–29–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0424; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–014–AD; Amendment 

39–17564; AD 2013–16–26] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for all 

Airbus Model A330–200 Freighter series 

airplanes; Model A330–200 and –300 

series airplanes, and Model A340–200 

and –300 series airplanes. This AD was 

prompted by reports of cracked adjacent 

frame forks of a forward cargo door. 

This AD requires repetitive detailed 

inspections for cracks and sheared, 

loose, or missing rivets of the forward 

cargo door and, for certain airplanes, of 

the aft cargo door, and repair if 

necessary. We are issuing this AD to 

detect and correct cracked or ruptured 

cargo door frames, which could result in 

reduced structural integrity of the 

forward or aft cargo door. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

October 4, 2013. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in this AD 

as of October 4, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov or in person at the 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, M–30, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone 

(425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to include an AD that would 

apply to the specified products. The 

NPRM was published in the Federal 

Register on May 20, 2013 (78 FR 29261). 

The NPRM proposed to correct an 

unsafe condition for the specified 

products. The European Aviation Safety 

Agency (EASA), which is the Technical 

Agent for the Member States of the 

European Community, has issued EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2012–0274, 

dated December 21, 2012 (referred to 

after this as the Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the 

MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition 

for the specified products. The MCAI 

states: 

One A330 operator recently reported a case 

where two adjacent frame (FR) forks of a 

forward cargo door were found cracked. 

FR20B was found cracked through, FR21 was 

found cracked half through. At the time of 

the findings, the affected aeroplane had 

accumulated around 21 000 flight cycles (FC) 

and it had already been inspected in 

accordance with EASA AD 2011–0007R1 

[(http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_

2011_0007_R1.pdf/AD_2011-0007R1_1)] 

[which corresponds to FAA AD 2012–12–12, 

Amendment 39–17092 (77 FR 37797, June 

25, 2012)] and ALI [airworthiness limitation 

instructions] Task 523106–01–1. However, 

during those inspections, the forward cargo 

door handle access panel is not required to 

be removed, which explains why the cracks 

at these two internal frame locations were not 

detected. 

After further analysis, it was determined 

that, in case of cracked or ruptured (forward 

or aft) cargo door frame, the loads will be 

transferred to the remaining structural 

elements. However, the second load path is 

able to sustain the loads for a limited number 

of flight cycles only. 

This condition, if not detected and 

corrected, could lead to rupture of two 

vertical frames, resulting in reduced 

structural integrity of the forward or aft cargo 

door. 

To address this condition, Airbus issued 

four separate Alert Operators Transmissions 

(AOT), giving instructions for repetitive 

inspections of the affected areas. 

For the reasons described above, this 

[EASA] AD requires repetitive detailed visual 

inspections of aft cargo door at FR60 and 

FR60A [for certain airplanes] and forward 

cargo door at FR21 and FR20B [for all 

airplanes], where the cargo door handle 

access panels are located, as follow: 

—Outer skin rivets for sheared, loose or 

missing rivets at frame fork ends, 

—whole inner forks for cracks and for 

sheared, loose or missing rivets at frame 

web and flange after removal of handle 

access panels, and 

the accomplishment of the applicable 

corrective actions [which include repair, in 

accordance with a method approved by the 

Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA.] 

Note: Accomplishment of the above 

inspections does not cancel accomplishment 

of the inspections as required by EASA [AD] 

2011–0007R1, nor accomplishment of those 

in accordance with ALI Task 523106–01–1. 

You may obtain further information by 

examining the MCAI in the AD docket. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. We 

received no comments on the NPRM (78 

FR 29261, May 20, 2013) or on the 

determination of the cost to the public. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the available data and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

as proposed–except for minor editorial 

changes. We have determined that these 

minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 

29261, May 20, 2013) for correcting the 

unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 29261, 

May 20, 2013). 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 66 

airplanes of U.S. registry. We also 

estimate that it takes 1 work-hour per 

product to comply with the basic 

requirements of this AD. The average 

labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based 

on these figures, we estimate the cost on 

U.S. operators to be $5,610, or $85 per 

product. 

We have received no definitive data 

that would enable us to provide cost 

estimates for the on-condition actions 

specified in this AD. 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 53641 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this AD will not 

have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the MCAI, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

2013–16–26 Airbus: Amendment 39–17564. 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0424; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–014–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes 

effective October 4, 2013. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Airbus Model A330– 

201, –202, –203, –223, –223F, –243, –243F, 

–301, –302, –303, –321, –322, –323, –341, 

–342, and –343 airplanes; and Model A340– 

211, –212, –213, –311, –312, and –313 

airplanes; certificated in any category; all 

manufacturer serial numbers (MSNs). 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 52, Doors. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by reports of 

cracked adjacent frame forks of a forward 

cargo door. We are issuing this AD to detect 

and correct cracked or ruptured cargo door 

frames, which could result in reduced 

structural integrity of the forward or aft cargo 

door. 

(f) Compliance 

You are responsible for having the actions 

required by this AD performed within the 

compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

(g) Inspections for Certain Airplanes 

For Model A330–200, –200 Freighter, and 

–300 airplanes up to MSN 0162 inclusive, 

except those on which Airbus Service 

Bulletin A330–52–3044 has been embodied 

in service; and for Model A340–200 and –300 

airplanes up to MSN 0164 inclusive, except 

those on which Airbus Service Bulletin 

A340–52–4054 has been embodied in service: 

Before the accumulation of 15,800 total flight 

cycles since the airplane’s first flight or 

within 100 flight cycles after the effective 

date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do 

a detailed inspection of the outer skin rivets 

at the frame fork end of frame (FR)60 and 

FR60A of the aft cargo door for sheared, 

loose, or missing rivets; and do a detailed 

inspection of the whole FR60 and FR60A 

forks for cracking and for sheared, loose, or 

missing rivets at the frame web and flanges; 

in accordance with Airbus Alert Operator 

Transmission (AOT) A330–A52L001–12, 

dated December 3, 2012; or Airbus AOT 

A340–A52L002–12, dated December 3, 2012; 

as applicable. Repeat the inspections 

thereafter at intervals not to exceed 400 flight 

cycles. 

(h) Inspections for All Airplanes 

Within the applicable compliance time 

specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this 

AD, do a detailed inspection of outer skin 

rivets at the frame fork end of FR21 and 

FR20B of the forward cargo door for sheared, 

loose, or missing rivets; and do a detailed 

inspection of the whole FR21 and FR20B 

forks for cracks and for sheared, loose, or 

missing rivets at the frame web and flanges; 

in accordance with Airbus AOT A330– 

A52L003–12, dated December 3, 2012; or 

Airbus AOT A340–A52L004–12, dated 

December 3, 2012; as applicable. Repeat this 

inspection thereafter at intervals not to 

exceed 800 flight cycles. 

(1) For airplanes having less than 18,400 

total flight cycles since the airplane’s first 

flight as of the effective date of this AD: 

Before the accumulation of 10,600 total flight 

cycles since the airplane’s first flight, or 

within 100 flight cycles after the effective 

date of this AD, whichever occurs later. 

(2) For airplanes having 18,400 total flight 

cycles or more since the airplane’s first flight 

as of the effective date of this AD: Within 50 

flight cycles after the effective date of this 

AD. 

(i) Repair 

If any cracking, or sheared, loose, or 

missing rivet is found during any inspection 

required by this AD, before further flight, 

repair using a method approved by either the 

Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the 

European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or 

its delegated agent). 

(j) Non-Terminating Action 

Doing the repair required by paragraph (i) 

of this AD is not terminating action for the 

repetitive inspections required by paragraphs 

(g) and (h) of this AD for that cargo door, 

unless the repair instruction specifically 

states it is terminating action. 

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
53642 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 169 / Friday, August 30, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

Airplane Directorate, FAA 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; 

telephone (425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227– 

1149. Information may be emailed to: 9- 

ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. 

Before using any approved AMOC, notify 

your appropriate principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(l) Related Information 

Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2012–0274, dated 

December 21, 2012, for related information, 

which can be found in the AD docket on the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Airbus Alert Operator Transmission 

A330–A52L001–12, dated December 3, 2012. 

The first page of this document contains the 

document number and date; no other pages 

contain this information. 

(ii) Airbus Alert Operator Transmission 

A330–A52L003–12, dated December 3, 2012. 

The first page of this document contains the 

document number and date; no other pages 

contain this information. 

(iii) Airbus Alert Operator Transmission 

A340–A52L002–12, dated December 3, 2012. 

The first page of this document contains the 

document number and date; no other pages 

contain this information. 

(iv) Airbus Alert Operator Transmission 

A340–A52L004–12, dated December 3, 2012. 

The first page of this document contains the 

document number and date; no other pages 

contain this information. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness 

Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 

31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 

5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email 

airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; 

Internet http://www.airbus.com. 

(4) You may review copies of the service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 

9, 2013. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–19923 Filed 8–29–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

RIN 3084–AA98 

16 CFR Part 310 

Telemarketing Sales Rule Fees 

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade 

Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’ or 

‘‘FTC’’) is amending its Telemarketing 

Sales Rule (‘‘TSR’’) by updating the fees 

charged to entities accessing the 

National Do Not Call Registry (the 

‘‘Registry’’) as required by the Do-NotCall Registry Fee Extension Act of 2007. 

DATES: Effective Date: The revised fees 

will become effective October 1, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of this 

document should be sent to: Public 

Reference Branch, Federal Trade 

Commission, Room 130, 600 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20580. Copies of this document are 

also available on the Internet at the 

Commission’s Web site: http://

www.ftc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ami 

Joy Dziekan, (202) 326–2648, BCP, 

Federal Trade Commission, 600 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room H– 

246, Washington, DC 20580. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To comply 

with the Do-Not-Call Registry Fee 

Extension Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110–188, 

122 Stat. 635) (‘‘Act’’), the Commission 

is amending the TSR by updating the 

fees entities are charged for accessing 

the Registry as follows: the revised rule 

increases the annual fee for access to the 

Registry for each area code of data from 

$58 to $59 per area code; increases the 

fee per area code of data during the 

second six months of an entity’s annual 

subscription period from $29 to $30; 

and increases the maximum amount 

that will be charged to any single entity 

for accessing area codes of data from 

$15,962 to $16,228. 

These increases are in accordance 

with the Act, which specifies that 

beginning after fiscal year 2009, the 

dollar amounts charged shall be 

increased by an amount equal to the 

amounts specified in the Act, multiplied 

by the percentage (if any) by which the 

average of the monthly consumer price 

index (for all urban consumers 

published by the Department of Labor) 

(‘‘CPI’’) for the most recently ended 12- 

month period ending on June 30 

exceeds the CPI for the 12-month period 

ending June 30, 2008. The Act also 

states that any increase shall be rounded 

to the nearest dollar and that there shall 

be no increase in the dollar amounts if 

the change in the CPI is less than one 

percent. For fiscal year 2009, the Act 

specified that the original annual fee for 

access to the Registry for each area code 

of data was $54 per area code, or $27 

per area code of data during the second 

six months of an entity’s annual 

subscription period, and that the 

maximum amount that would be 

charged to any single entity for 

accessing area codes of data would be 

$14,850. 

The determination whether a fee 

change is required and the amount of 

the fee change involves a two-step 

process. First, to determine whether a 

fee change is required, we measure the 

change in the CPI from the time of the 

previous increase in fees. There was an 

increase in the fees for fiscal year 2013. 

Accordingly, we calculated the change 

in the CPI since last year, and the 

increase was 1.66 percent. Because this 

change is over the one percent 

threshold, the fees will change for fiscal 

year 2014. 

Second, to determine how much the 

fees should increase this fiscal year, we 

use the calculation specified by the Act 

set forth above, the percentage change in 

the baseline CPI applied to the original 

fees for fiscal year 2009. The average 

value of the CPI for July 1, 2007 to June 

30, 2008 was 211.702; the average value 

for July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013 was 

231.352, an increase of 9.28 percent. 

Applying the 9.28 percent increase to 

the base amount from fiscal year 2009, 

leads to an increase from $58 to $59 in 

the fee from last year for access to a 

single area code of data for a full year 

for fiscal year 2014. The actual amount 

is $59.01, but when rounded, pursuant 

to the Act, the amount is $59. The fee 

for accessing an additional area code for 

a half year increases to $29.51 (rounded 

to $30). The maximum amount charged 

increases to $16,228.08 (rounded to 

$16,228). 

Administrative Procedure Act; 

Regulatory Flexibility Act; Paperwork 

Reduction Act 

The revisions to the Fee Rule are 

technical in nature and merely 

incorporate statutory changes to the 

TSR. These statutory changes have been 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES