alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gregory T. Van Meter, administrator of the estate of Honore H. Douglass, deceased, appellee, v. Rosamond L. Chadwick and Clarence B. Chadwick, appellants.

Gen. No. 30,433.

Bill for an accounting and for a redelivery of certain pledged property. Decree for complainant. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Francis S. Wilson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 23, 1926.

Newby & Murphy, for appellants; Albert E. Isley, of counsel.

John W. Ellis, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice

Taylor delivered the opinion of the court.
617.105-1 Uses. ( d ) Every multiyear contract shall comply with FAR 17.104(c), unless an exception is approved through the budget process in coordination with the cognizant financial management office/comptroller.
#### In the Matter of Harrison Williams, Deceased. Arthur H. Dean et al., as Executors of Harrison Williams, Deceased, Appellants; State Tax Commission, Respondent.

In a proceeding to appraise the estate of a decedent for the purpose of fixing the estate tax under the provisions of article' 10-C of the Tax Law, the executors appeal' from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, entered May 4, 1962 upon the opinion and decision of the court, which denied their motion to reopen the court’s prior *pro forma*order, entered June 28, 1957, fixing the estate tax, and to remit the matter to the official appraiser for amendment in the light of supervening circumstances. Decree reversed on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and motion granted, without costs. Findings of fact implicit in the decision of the Surrogate, insofar as they may be inconsistent herewith, are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. The motion to reopen was addressed to the discretion of the Surrogate, to be exercised within the broad power conferred upon him by statute (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 20, subd. 6). The discretion of this court supersedes that of the Surrogate (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 309). With respect to the executors’ statement in their May, 1957 affidavit "relating to additional legal fees dependent upon the outcome of existent litigation, we regard such statement to be a reservation as to the tax proceeding and as to the fixation order of June 28, 1957. Some seven months after the making of such order, a Federal stockholders’ derivative action, based on alleged trnasaetions of the testator with respect to a corporation of which he had been a director, was commenced; in that action judgment against the estate was sought in excess of the gross assets of the estate. In our opinion the compromise settlement of that action for $800,000 should be deducted for tax purposes. It was a bona fide agreement even though the executors were opposed and even though the testator’s widow favored settlement in order to acquire assets of the estate. Such a purpose is not improper. The money was paid to the alleged aggrieved corporation; the settlement was approved by court order; and dismissal of the' complaint against codefendants was denied. No claim is made that the suit was without semblance of merit or that the payment was a gift. Counsel *932fees in connection with the Federal action, as well as those heretofore referred to, together with taxes and disbursements which have accrued since the original *pro forma*tax order, should also be deducted for tax purposes. The proposed corrections conform to the actual facts *(Matter of Willets,*119 App. Div. 119, affd. 190 N. Y. 527; *Matter of Weiss,*275 N. Y. 618; *Matter of Weiler,*122 N. Y. S. 608, affd. 139 App. Div. 905; *Matter of Silliman,*79 App. Div. 98, affd. 175 N. Y. 513; cf. *Matter of Chisholm,*177 Misc. 423, affd. 264 App. Div. 793, affd. 290 N. Y. 842). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [28 Misc 2d 659.]
#### 752.231-71 Salary supplements for HG employees.

As prescribed in 731.205-71, for use in all contracts with a possible need or services of a HG employee. The clause should also be inserted in all subsequent sub-contracts.

# Salary Supplements for HG Employees (MAR 2015)

(a) Salary supplements are payments made that augment an employee's base salary or premiums, overtime, extra payments, incentive payment and allowances for which the HG employee would qualify under HG rules or practice for the performance of his/hers regular duties or work performed during his/hers regular office hours. Per diem, invitational travel, honoraria and payment for work carried out outside of normal working hours are not considered to be salary supplements.

(b) Salary supplements to HG Employees are not allowable without the written approval of the contracting officer.

(c) The Contractor must insert a clause containing all the terms of this clause, including the requirement to obtain the written approval of the contracting officer for all salary supplements, in all subcontracts under this contract that may entail HG employee salary supplements.

(End of clause)

[64 FR 16649, Apr. 6, 1999, as amended at 79 FR 74988, 74999, Dec. 16, 2014; 89 FR 4209, Jan. 23, 2024]
828.7002 Financial protection. ( a ) A contractor shall have and maintain an amount of financial protection to cover liability to third persons and loss of or damage to the contractor's property that meets one of the following: ( 1 ) The maximum amount of insurance available from private sources; or
( 2 ) A lesser amount that the Secretary establishes after taking into consideration the cost and terms of private insurance.
( b ) Financial protection may include private insurance, private contractual indemnities, self-insurance, other proof of financial responsibility, or a combination that provides the maximum amount required. If a contractor elects to self-insure, the contractor must provide the contracting officer, before award, proof of financial responsibility up to the maximum amount required. (38 U.S.C. 7317)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Regulations and Procedures Technical Advisory Committee will meet March 9, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, via remote teleconference. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on implementation of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and provides for continuing review to update the EAR as needed.

## Agenda

### Public Session

1. Opening remarks by the Chairman

2. Opening remarks by the Bureau of Industry and Security

3. Presentation of papers or comments by the Public

4. Regulations Update

5. Working Group Reports

6. Automated Export System Update

### Closed Session

7. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).

                    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at                     *Yvette.Springer@bis.doc.gov,*                     no later than March 2, 2021.                

To the extent that time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. The public may submit written statements at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate the distribution of public presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the public presentation materials prior to the meeting to Ms. Springer via email.

For more information, call Yvette Springer at (202) 482-2813.

Yvette Springer,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2021-03684 Filed 2-22-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)      

# Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)

The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is the world’s largest, ongoing telephone health survey system, tracking health conditions and risk behaviors in the United States yearly since 1984. Currently, data are collected monthly in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam.

http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/
715.303-70 Responsibilities of USAID evaluation committees. ( a ) *Establishment and composition of USAID evaluation committees.* A technical evaluation committee shall be established for each proposed procurement. In each case, the committee shall be composed of a chair representing the cognizant technical office, a representative of the contracting office (who shall be a non-voting member of the committee), and representatives from other concerned offices as appropriate.
( b ) *Technical evaluation procedures.* ( 1 ) The contracting officer will receive all proposals and provide to the chair a listing and copies of the technical proposals and instructions for conducting the evaluation.
( 2 ) The chair will promptly call a meeting of the committee to evaluate the proposals received. The evaluation shall be based on the evaluation factors set forth in the solicitation document.
( 3 ) The chair shall prepare and provide to the contracting officer written documentation summarizing the results of the evaluation of each proposal, including an assessment of past performance information in accordance with (48 CFR) FAR 15.305(a)(2). The documentation shall include narrative justification of the evaluation results.
( 4 ) The contracting officer is responsible for reviewing the documentation justifying the evaluation results to determine that it is adequate and complete. The contracting officer shall return a justification determined to be inadequate to the chair for revision.
( 5 ) No member of the USAID evaluation committee shall hold discussions with any offeror before or during the USAID evaluation committee's proceedings, nor shall any information about the proposals be provided to anyone not on the committee without first obtaining the contracting officer's consent.
[61 FR 39091, July 26, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 64 FR 16648, Apr. 6, 1999; 79 FR 74988, Dec. 16, 2014]
Order entered April 3 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 12
- 01 18 6
- CR
LAURA KAYE SANDERS , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB10
- 52665
- A 

### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.
On February 12, 2013, we denied appellant’s second motion to extend time to file h er brief and ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the brief has no t been filed. W e ADOPT t he findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is not indigent
and is represented by counsel Mark Lassiter; and ( 3 ) counsel anticipated filing the brief “as soon as [h]e is able.” We note that although the reporter’s record r eflects several exhibits were admitted into evidence, the exhibits were not included in the record filed with the Court. Accordingly, we
ORDER Vicki Tuck, official court reporter of the County Criminal Court No. 1, to file, withinFIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing all of the exhibits
admitted into evidence in this case.
We ORDER appellant to file her brief within FORTY
- FIVE DAYS of the date of this order. No further extensions will be granted. If appellant’s brief is not filed within the time specified, the Court will, without further notice, submit the appeal without briefs. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b).
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Vicki Tuck, official court reporte r, County Criminal Court No. 1, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
#### MARLETT et al., Respondents, v. TUMPOWSKI et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division. Fourth Department.

January 10, 1906.)

Action by Arthur V. Marlett, and others against Lena Tumpowski, and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### 643.102-70 Contract compliance and review.

When applicable, the contracting officer shall ensure the proposed contract modification complies with the competition requirements of FAR Part 6 and DOSAR Part 606.

[53 FR 26176, July 11, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 66767, Dec. 28, 1994; 64 FR 43629, Aug. 11, 1999]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      442
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (33)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,473
<PP&E>                                           3,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,485)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,905
<BONDS>                                            400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         23
<COMMON>                                           828
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,316
<SALES>                                          2,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,025
<CGS>                                            2,114
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,223)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,223)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,223)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
6106.604 Arbitration request [Rule 604]. ( a ) An applicant for public assistance may request arbitration by following applicable FEMA guidance implementing section 423 of the Stafford Act.
( b ) Applicants shall efile arbitration requests with the Board as prescribed by Board Rule 1 (48 CFR 6101.1). Voluminous attachments may be filed separately in electronic media as if under Board Rule 4(b)(1) and (3) (48 CFR 6101.4(b)(1) and (3)). The Clerk of the Board will acknowledge an arbitration request by emailing the parties a docketing notice.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31019 Conference Calendar

CHARLIE HOOD, JR., as Administrator of the Estate of his minor child, CHARLES NICHOLAS HOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus LOUISIANA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-742

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charlie Hood, Jr., as the administrator of the estate of his minor child, Charles Nicholas Hood, appeals the dismissal of his suit which challenged the constitutionality of a Louisiana High School Athletic Association (LHSAA) eligibility regulation. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) andNo. 97-31019 -2- 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and AFFIRM because the pleadings do not show the existence of a justiciable controversy.
AFFIRMED.
t

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

USDA F orest Servic e 

Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest 

1200 Franklin Way
 

Sparks, Nevada 89431 

http://www.fs.usda.gov/htnf
 

USDI Bureau of Land Management

Nevada State Office Califor nia State Office 

1340 Financial Boulevard 2800 Cottage Way,Suite W-1623 

Reno, Nevada 89502-7147 Sacramento, California 95825-1886 

http://www.bl m.gov/nv http://www.blm.gov/ca 

Nevada and Northeastern California 

Greater Sage-Grouse Draft Land Use Plan Amendmen t 

and Environmental Impact Statement 

Errata Sheet
 

Dear Reader: 

The purpose of this errata sheet is to correct two typographical errors in the Nevada and Northeastern 

California Greater Sage-Grouse Draft Land Use Plan Ame ndment (LUPA) and Env ironmental Impact 

Statement (EIS). The LUPA and Final Environmental I mpact Statement will incorporate these 

corrections. 

Section 2.8.2, Table 2-5, Description of Alternative Actions 

Table 2-5, Description of Alternative Actions, in Section 2.8.2 provides specific management actions by 

BLM and USFS resource management program area for each of the six proposed alternatives (A, B, C, 

D, E, and F). A color coding system is used in the table to help the reader distinguish each resource and 

resource use. Additio nally, each management action in the table is given a unique code. For example, 

“Action C-CTTM 1” is the code given for thefirst proposed action for Comprehensive Travel and 

Transportation Management (CTTM) under Alternative C. The matrix of actions beginning with Action 

A-SSS-1 at the start of the table on page 123 through Action F-SD-1 on page 300 is accurately 

represented. However, due to a document pro duction error, duplicate actions are incorrectly included 

beginning on page 300. A one line break in the table on page 300 between the row of actions ending 

with Action F-SD-1 and the subsequent row beginning with Action A-CTTM 1 indicates where the table 

was intended to end. Accordingly, the reader isasked to disregard the d uplicate actions that begin with 

Action A-CTTM 1 on page 300 and end with Action F-SD 1 on page 354. The footnotes at the end of 

the duplicated portion of the table on page 354 are correct and applicable. 

All Pages 

The accurate date of the draft LUPA/EIS document should reflect the actual date of the Notice of 

Availability in November 2013.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Banking Act of 1935

              																	United States. Congress					 and 	Seventy-Fourth Congress, 1935-1937. 						*Banking Act of 1935 : Conference Report (To Accompany H.R. 7617)*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										August 17, 1935,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/999,			accessed on September 23, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER