alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.4


 


AMENDMENT
#1


 


TO
THE SUBSIDIARY GUARANTEE DATED JULY 7, 2016


 


This
Amendment, dated May 19, 2017 (the “Amendment”), is entered into by and between each of the signatories hereto
(together with any other entity that may become a party hereto as provided herein, the “Guarantors”), and Iconic
Holdings, LLC, a Delaware LLC (together with permitted assigns, the “Secured Parties”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Guarantors and the Secured Parties entered that certain Subsidiary Guarantee (the “Guarantee”) dated
July 7, 2016;


 


WHEREAS,
HealthLynked Corp. (the “Company”) is requesting additional funding from the Secured Parties;


 


WHEREAS,
the Secured Parties agree to extend the additional loan subject to the execution and delivery of this Amendment to the Guarantee;


 


NOW
THEREFORE, the parties agree the Guarantee shall now also include the new loan to the Company evidenced by an eight month
$111,000 Fixed Convertible Promissory Note (“Note 2”) dated May 22, 2017.


 


ALL
OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE AGREEMENT REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.


 


Please
indicate acceptance and approval of this amendment dated May 19, 2017 by signing below:


 


	/s/
    George O’Leary	 	/s/
    Michael Sobeck
	Naples
    Women’s Center	 	Iconic
    Holdings, LLC
		 	 
	By:
    George O’Leary	 	By:
    Michael Sobeck
	 	 	 
	Its:
    CFO	 	Its:
    Manager
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 11

- 00551

- CR

JUAN ANTONIO CASTILLO

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County , Texas Trial Cause No. 09

- CRF

- 0284

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 14 , 2014
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10156 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to repeal certain provisions relating 

to the acceptance and use of contributions for public-private partnerships, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2024 

Ms. HAGEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to repeal certain 

provisions relating to the acceptance and use of contributions for public-private partnerships, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF CONTRIBUTIONS. 

4 Section 1241(f) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 

5 U.S.C. 3841(f)) is amended— 

6 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘FOR

7 PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS’’; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 10156 IH

1 (2) by amending paragraph (1) to read as fol2 lows: 

3 ‘‘(1) AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH CONTRIBUTION

4 ACCOUNTS.—Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary 

5 may establish a sub-account for each conservation 

6 program administered by the Secretary under sub7 title D to accept contributions of non-Federal funds 

8 to support the purposes of the program.’’; 

9 (3) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘a covered 

10 program shall be deposited into the account’’ and in11 serting ‘‘a conservation program administered by the 

12 Secretary under subtitle D shall be deposited into 

13 the sub-account’’; and 

14 (4) by striking paragraphs (3) through (10). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           National Teen Dating Abuse Helpline      

# National Teen Dating Abuse Helpline

The National Dating Abuse Helpline is the direct service provider behind loveisrespect.org, operating the 24/7 text, phone, and live chat services. The texting function of the Helpline allows for users to text the Helpline advocates 24 hours a day, seven days a week about anything ranging from questions about healthy dating to raising red flags about relationships. The Helpline’s peer advocates serve thousands of teens and young adults through the 24/7 phone service. Users call 1-866-331-9474 to be connected with an advocate who is trained to offer education, support and advocacy to those involved in dating abuse relationships as well as concerned friends, siblings, parents, teachers, law enforcement members and service providers. The live chat (IM-style) of the Helpline is another way for users to contact a peer advocate. They receive the same one-on-one, real-time, confidential information from a trained peer advocate as they do if they contact loveisrespect.org by text and phone.

http://www.loveisrespect.org
#### Alva Crawford, appellee, v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,654.

Action for personal injuries by negligence. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Philip L. Sullivan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 19250.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 23, 1926.

Rehearing denied July 8, 1926.

Winston, Strawn & Shaw, for appellant; John D. Black and E. G. Ince, of counsel.

Morse Ives, H. H. Patterson and C. C. Bodenstab, for appellee; H. H. Patterson, of counsel.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries IV, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ramon Chimelis, President of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

President (Principal Executive Officer)

February 4, 2009
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           FEMA Preparedness Tips for Parents and Guardians      

# FEMA Preparedness Tips for Parents and Guardians

This resource contains tailored, practical suggestions on preparedness and links to tools and resources for parents and guardians. Resources are pulled from FEMA, the Department of Education, CDC, and practitioners in the field. This resource helps parents and guardians better understand school emergency policies and will not only help parents and guardians recognize what safety measures are being offered in school, but it can also highlight areas where they can bolster their own emergency planning.

https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/30512
#### Costa A. Pandaleon et al., appellees, v. Andrea Russo, trading as Russo & Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 30,765.

Action for goods sold and delivered under contract. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry M. Walker, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed October 5, 1926.

Rehearing denied October 18, 1926.

Brown, Packard, Peckham & Barnes, for appellant.

Church, Haft & Robertson, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Pitch

delivered the opinion of the court.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Flavored Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students      

# Report: Flavored Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students

Researchers from CDC and FDA analyzed data from the 2014 National Youth Tobacco Survey to determine the prevalence of current use of flavored e-cigarette, hookah tobacco, cigar, pipe tobacco, or smokeless tobacco products, and menthol cigarettes among middle and high school students. An estimated 70% of all current youth tobacco users had used at least one flavored tobacco product in the past 30 days. Among current users, 63.3% used a flavored e-cigarette, 60.6% had used flavored hookah tobacco, and 63.5% had used a flavored cigar. 

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6438a2.htm?s_cid=mm6438a2_e&utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

AARON FITZPATRICK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 169 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of August, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

Data & ResearchEVALUATION OF PROGRAMS

## Executive Summary

## Full Report

PDF    (3.9 MB) | MS Word (9.7 MB)

|        |
|--------|
|   | Printable viewShare this page |
|        |

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Transforming Teaching
          - Family and Community Engagement
          - Early Learning

 

|  |
|--|
|  |
|  | Just for Teachers |  |
|  |

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a GrantEligibility for Grants

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works Clearinghouse

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy ProgramSubscribe to E-Mail Updates

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
#### HORNING, Respondent, v. HUDSON RIVR TELEPHONE CO. et al., Appellants.

ipreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Dertment.

March 7, 1906.)

Action by Nathan . Horning against the Hudson River Teleone Company and the Fulton County Gas & ectric Company.

No opinion. Motion de-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 $(0.021)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 $(0.021)


</TABLE>
#### 402.000 Scope of part.

As used throughout this chapter, the following words and terms are used as defined in this subpart unless the context in which they are used clearly requires a different meaning, or a different definition is prescribed for a particular part or portion of a part.
#### STODDARD,, Respondent, v. RUSAW, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 10, 1906.)

Action by Samuel O. Stoddard against Richarc Rusaw.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

HISCOCK, J„

not sitting.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No s . 4399 3/43 9 94

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

LUIS FRANCISCO RAZO

- GONZALEZ ,
Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 763

Filed: November 4, 2016
Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Jerome County. Hon. John K. Butler , District Judge.
Judgments of conviction and unified sentence of three years, with a minimum period of confinement of one year, for possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, and consecutive unified se ntence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for battery with intent to commit a serious felony, affirmed

. Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; J ason C. Pintler
, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. F l eming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________ PER CURIAM In Docket No. 43993, Luis Francisco Razo

- Gonzalez pleaded guilty to possession of a
controlled substance , methamphetamine, Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(c)(1 ) . The district court imposed a unified sentence of three year s , with one year determinate, suspended the sentence, and placed Razo

- Gonzalez on a term of probation . Subsequently, Razo

- Gonzalez violated the terms of his probation and the district cour t revoked probation and executed the underlying sentence. In Docket No. 43994, Razo

- Gonzalez pleaded guilty to battery with intent to commit a serious felony, I.C. §§ 18

- 903,

- 911, and the district court imposed a consecutive, unified2

sentence of fifteen years, with two years determinate. Razo

- Gonzalez appeals, contending that
his sentences are excessive. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonablen ess of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed t he record
in these case s , we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Razo

- Gonzalez ’s judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10335 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to increase certain 

criminal fines, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2024 

Ms. BARRAGA ́N (for herself and Ms. TLAIB) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 

increase certain criminal fines, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Water Justice 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 10335 IH

1 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES. 

2 Section 309(c)(2) of the Federal Water Pollution 

3 Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1319(c)(2)) is amended, in the 

4 matter following subparagraph (B)— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘$25,000 (subject to adjustments under this para7 graph)’’; 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘$50,000’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘$250,000 (subject to adjustments under this para10 graph)’’; 

11 (3) by striking ‘‘$100,000’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘$500,000 (subject to adjustments under this para13 graph)’’; and 

14 (4) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The 

15 Administrator shall annually adjust the maximum 

16 penalties under this paragraph by the percentage (if 

17 any) by which the Consumer Price Index for all18 urban consumers published by the Department of 

19 Labor for the month of October preceding the date 

20 of the adjustment exceeds such Consumer Price 

21 Index for the month of October in the preceding 

22 year, and shall publish each such adjustment in the 

23 Federal Register. An adjustment shall apply only 

24 with regard to a violation committed after the date 

25 of such publication.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
See TestingSeeSeeAbatementCurrent Version on EPA Websitehttp://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/tsd/pcbs/pubs/caulk/guide/flowchart.pdfCollectindoor airsamplesSampleCaulkAre PCBspresent at>50 ppm?YesPre1980When wasbuildinggandCharacterization SectionAbatementPlannedAbatementSectionSectionNoActionSampleSurroundingNoIf air levels ofPCBs are aboveEPA’srecommendedlevels, investigateareas of concernNofurtherAfter1980buildingbuilt?RenovationPlannedfor caulkMaterialfurtheractionDecide totest forPCBs?YesProceedwith CautionSeeRenovation/RepairNoAre PCBspresent?YesSeeAbatementSectionwithCautionRepairSectionNoNo Action forSurroundingIs Source ofPCBsManufactureror Release?ReleasePCBRemediationWaste: SeeDisposal SectionConsidertesting othermaterialsMaterialPCB Bulk ProductWaste : SeeDisposal SectionManufacturermaterials(e.g., paints)