alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Living on the Edge: The Conflict and Trauma that Lead to Teen Parent Homelessness      

# Living on the Edge: The Conflict and Trauma that Lead to Teen Parent Homelessness

Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy

This report describes the experiences of teen parents impacted by homelessness in Massachusetts. It reveals the trauma, abuse and neglect, family conflict, and in some cases, commercial sexual exploitation these youth experience. The report concludes with policy recommendations.

Homeless: pregnant and parenting youth

Policy recommendations

Policy makers

Service providers

Report

http://www.massteenpregnancy.org/sites/default/files/publications/matpliving-ed...
#### In the Matter of Jacob Horn, an Attorney, Respondent. Brooklyn Bar Association, Petitioner.

Application by petitioner to discipline respondent, granted; respondent suspended from the practice of law for one year, commencing 20 days after entry of the order hereon. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Brunswick Fuel SystemsBrunswickFuelSystemsTopic: Results of Pressurized Fuel Tanks on OutboardsDate: 13 August 2009Name: Mike TorgerudEPA Regulation§(1060.105 (c))(c) Portable marine fuel tanks and associated fuel-system componentsmust meet the followingrequirements:effective 01 Jan 2010g q(1) They must be self-sealing (without any manual vents) when notattached to the engines. The tanksmay not vent to the atmospherewhen attached to an enginewhenattachedtoanengine.(2) They must remainsealed up to a positive pressure of34.5 kPa(5.0 psig); however, they may contain air inlets that open when thereis a vacuum pressure inside the tank.Outboard Tolerance to Inlet PressureCurrent Production U.S.A. SalesEngine Family 7kPaVERTICAL35kPaVERTICAL35kPaFULL TILTNeedle“Pop-off”FULL TILT7kPaFULL TILT &TRAILER35kPaFULL TILT &TRAILER138kPaFULL TILT &TRAILERStaticDynamicFULLTILTTRAILERTRAILERTRAILER90 Hp DIPASS PASS PASSSpec >69kPa? ?FAIL150 Hp DIPASS PASS PASSSpec >69kPa FAIL FAIL FAIL225 Hp DIPASS PASS PASSSpec >69kPa? ?FAIL40 Hp 4 StPASS PASS PASSSpec >69kPa FAIL FAIL FAIL250 Hp 4 StFAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL > 0 FAIL FAIL FAIL150 Hp 4 StFAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL> 0 FAIL FAIL FAIL90 Hp 4 StFAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL > 0 FAIL FAIL FAIL90Hp4St25 Hp 4 StPASS PASS PASSfLeak >138kPa FAIL FAIL FAIL15-20 Hp 4 StPASS PASS PASSLeak >103kPa FAIL FAIL FAIL8,9.9 Hp 4 StPASS PASS PASSLeak >103kPa FAIL FAIL FAIL4,5,6 HP 4 StPASS PASS PASSLeak > 76kPa FAIL FAIL FAIL2.5, 3.5 Hp 4 StPASS PASS PASSLeak >69kPa FAIL FAIL FAILSAMPLE SIZE= 1 UNITOutboard Tolerance to Inlet PressureLegacy and Competitive U.S.A. SalesEngine Family 7kPaVERTICAL35kPaVERTICAL35kPaFULL TILTLeakPressureFULL TILT7kPaFULL TILT &TRAILER35kPaFULL TILT &TRAILER138kPaFULL TILT &TRAILERStaticDynamicLegacy30-40 Hp2 CyclePASS PASS PASSFAIL >83kPa ? ? ?40 Hp Carbureted4 CyclePASS PASS PASSFAIL >83kPa ? ? ?6-15 HP 2 CyclePASSPASSFAIL FAIL >35kPFAIL FAIL FAIL15HP2CycleaStaticDynamicCompetitiveEngine Family 7kPaVERTICAL35kPaVERTICAL35kPaFULL TILTLeakPressureFULL TILT7kPaFULL TILT &TRAILER35kPaFULL TILT &TRAILER138kPaFULL TILT &TRAILERCompetitor A 25 Hp2 CyclePASS PASS PASS FAIL >138kPa FAIL FAIL FAILCompetitor B 15 Hp4CyclePASS PASS FAIL FAIL >35kPa FAIL FAIL FAILCompetitor C 2.5 HpPASS PASS FAIL FAIL >27kPa FAIL FAIL FAILCompetitor A 40 HpPASS PASS PASS FAIL >140kPa FAIL FAIL FAILSAMPLE SIZE= 1 UNIT2005MY 4 CycleReference Test Video5 and 20psi Outboard Connector wmv5and20psiOutboardConnector.wmvRemoved for docket submittal
----

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY**

**ACT OF 2002**

 I, Edward D. Ford, Director, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F  of Nettron.com, Inc. (the “Company”);

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does  not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material  fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under  which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered  by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other    financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all    material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash    flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual    report;
4.  The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

            a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information  relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known  to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which  this annual report is being prepared;

             b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the  "Evaluation Date"); and

             c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the  disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation  Date;

5.  The Company's other certifying officers and I  have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors  and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing  the equivalent function): 

            a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls  which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize  and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any  material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

            b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees  who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and 

6.  The Company's other certifying officers and I  have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes  in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal  controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any  corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses

  1

                   /s/  Edward D. Ford   Edward D. Ford   Director   September 29, 2003 

 2
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael Clementz, the Chief Executive Officer of Frontier Financial
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
     "Form 10-K"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.   the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 11, 2004                        /s/ Michael Clementz
                                           ------------------------------
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7698** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. MICHAEL SCOTT CASH , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for th e District of South Carolina , at Greenville
. Margaret B. Seymour , District Judge. ( 6:05

- cv - 00338

- MBS ; 6:99

- cr - 00266

- MB )

Submitted : April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY , and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Michael Scott Cash , Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr. , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER C URIAM: Michael Scott Cash appeals the district court ’ s order s adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cash’s motion to return property and denying Cash’s motion for reconsideration . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cash , Nos. 6:05

- cv - 00338

- MBS ; 6:99

- cr - 00266

- MB (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2010 ; July 1 , 2010)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal co ntentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
625.105 Determining reasonableness of cost. ( a ) (1) The authority to make the determinations prescribed in FAR 25.105(a)(1) is delegated, without power of redelegation, to the head of the contracting activity.
[69 FR 19336, Apr. 13, 2004]
#### Yellow Cab Manufacturing Company, appellee, v. De Luxe Cab Company, appellant.

Gen. No: 30,706.

Action upon promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff and motion to set aside judgment denied. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Theodore E. Ehler, Judge, presiding. Heard in the third division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 23, 1926.

Rehearing denied July 8, 1926:

Frederick W. Snider and Angus Roy Shannon, for appellant.

Samuels, Costello & Greenberg and Harry C. Grossman, for appellee.

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Estelle F. Sophian v. Manfred G. Von Linde.

Motion to dismiss appeal and for other relief denied in all respects, with $10 costs. (See CPLR 5501, subd. [a], par. 2.) Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Tálente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
705.202 Exceptions. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Agency determinations.* The head of the U.S. Agency for International Development has determined after consultation with the Administrator of the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, that advance notice is not appropriate or reasonable for the following: ( 1 ) Contract actions described in 706.302-70(b)(1) through (3); or
( 2 ) A contract of $250,000 or less by an overseas contracting activity issued in accordance with the requirements in FAR part 13.
[89 FR 4205, Jan. 23, 2024]
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ramon Chimelis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries II, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(C)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 7, 2009

/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### 452.237-74 Key Personnel.

As prescribed in 437.110(d), insert a clause substantially as follows:

# Key Personnel (FEB 1988)

(a) The Contractor shall assign to this contract the following key personnel: __________

(b) During the first ninety (90) days of performance, the Contractor shall make no substitutions of key personnel unless the substitution is necessitated by illness, death, or termination of employment. The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer within 15 calendar days after the occurrence of any of these events and provide the information required by paragraph (c) below. After the initial 90-day period, the Contractor shall submit the information required by paragraph (c) to the Contracting Officer at least 15 days prior to making any permanent substitutions.

(c) The Contractor shall provide a detailed explanation of the circumstances necessitating the proposed substitutions, complete resumes for the proposed substitutes, and any additional information requested by the Contracting Officer. Proposed substitutes should have comparable qualifications to those of the persons being replaced. The Contracting Officer will notify the Contractor within 15 calendar days after receipt of all required information of the decision on substitutions. The contract will be modified to reflect any approved changes of key personnel.

(End of clause)
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 145/2019

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 145 |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6225 ta' April 2019 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 145

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6225 ta' April 2019

---

| Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informazzjoni |
| | INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA |
| | Il-Parlament EwropewIl-Kunsill |
| 2019/C 145/01 | Dikjarazzjoni tal-Kummissjoni rigward ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/632 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill li jemenda r-Regolament (UE) Nru 952/2013 sabiex jittawwal l-użu tranżizzjonali ta’ mezzi oħra għajr it-tekniki ta’ proċessar ta’ data elettronika previsti fil-Kodiċi Doganali tal-Unjoni u rigward id-dikjarazzjoni konġunta tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwarhom | 1 |

Werrej

Paġna

IV   Informazzjoni

INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA

Il-Parlament EwropewIl-Kunsill

2019/C 145/01

Dikjarazzjoni tal-Kummissjoni rigward ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/632 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill li jemenda r-Regolament (UE) Nru 952/2013 sabiex jittawwal l-użu tranżizzjonali ta’ mezzi oħra għajr it-tekniki ta’ proċessar ta’ data elettronika previsti fil-Kodiċi Doganali tal-Unjoni u rigward id-dikjarazzjoni konġunta tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwarhom

data

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

IV Informazzjoni

INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA

Il-Parlament Ewropew Il-Kunsill

| 25.4.2019 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 145/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2019

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 145/1

---

Dikjarazzjoni tal-Kummissjoni rigward ir-Regolament (UE) 2019/632 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill li jemenda r-Regolament (UE) Nru 952/2013 sabiex jittawwal l-użu tranżizzjonali ta’ mezzi oħra għajr it-tekniki ta’ proċessar ta’ data elettronika previsti fil-Kodiċi Doganali tal-Unjoni u rigward id-dikjarazzjoni konġunta tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwarhom (1)

(2019/C 145/01)

Il-Kummissjoni tilqa’ l-ftehim tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill dwar il-proposta li tittawwal l-iskadenza għall-użu tranżizzjonali ta’ mezzi oħra għajr it-tekniki ta’ pproċessar ta’ data elettronika previsti fil-Kodiċi Doganali tal-Unjoni.

Il-Kummissjoni tirrikonoxxi d-dikjarazzjoni konġunta tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill li tinnota li kwalunkwe ħidma futura mill-Qorti Ewropea tal-Awdituri li tivvaluta r-rapporti mħejjija mill-Kummissjoni abbażi tal-Artikolu 278a tal-Kodiċi Doganali tal-Unjoni tista’ tikkontribwixxi b’mod pożittiv biex jiġi evitat aktar dewmien.

Jekk il-Qorti tal-Awdituri tiddeċiedi li tivvaluta r-rapporti tal-Kummissjoni, il-Kummissjoni, kif meħtieġ mill-Artikolu 287(3) tat-Trattat dwar il-Funzjonament tal-Unjoni Ewropea, se tikkollabora b’mod sħiħ mal-Qorti Ewropea tal-Awdituri u tieħu kont sħiħ ta’ dawn is-sejbiet.

---

(1)  ĠU L 111, 25.4.2019, p. 54.

---
Exhibit 10.33
 BEACON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC.
   
    Company Offering Act Offering Amount Unit Units Offering Company Common Stock Investor
Warrants Securities Selling
Agent




---



##### 



PPM Offering Documents Offering Period
 Prospective Investor Regulation D SEC Subscribers
  Closing Closing Date
   2




---



##### 



1934 Act
    Selling Agent Warrants
   3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



provided, however,
 7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



Non-Solicitation Period
   10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



Very truly yours,
BEACON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS GROUP, INCBy:

/s/ Bruce
WidenerName:
    
    Bruce WidenerTitle:
    
    CEO Accepted as of the datefirst above written:[SELLING AGENT]By:Name:
    
    [CONTACT NAME]Title:
    
    [CONTACT TITLE]
 12
#### Sidney Schwartz, Doing Business under the Name of Glad Record Company, Appellant, v. Lionel Hampton et al., Individually and as Copartners, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondents. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente and Stevens, JJ.; Rabin and McNally, JJ., dissent in part in the following memorandum by Rabin, J.: I dissent and vote to reverse the judgment dismissing the complaint and would grant judgment to the plaintiff enjoining the defendant, Gladys Hampton with respect to the infringement of plaintiff’s trade-mark. The word *“*glad ” as used in connection with a phonograph record is not descriptive of such article nor does it indicate its ingredients, mode of composition, characteristic qualities, properties or nature. Accordingly,- the word may be exclusively appropriated, and, in a proper situation protected *(Fischer*v. *Blank,*138 N. Y. 244, 249). For the plaintiff to have acquired a right to the use of such word as a trademark there must be demonstrated an affixiation and user. The proof is clear that the word “glad” was affixed to the phonograph records of the plaintiff and his predecessors. Similarly, it was established that such records were sold and distributed. While the user proven was not great it was sufficient, in company with the intent to continue such use, to establish plaintiff’s right to the mark *(Ritz Cycle Car Co.*v. *Driggs-Seabury Ordnance Corp.,*237 F. 125; *Richter*v. *Reynolds,*59 F. 577; see Hopkins, Trademarks [4th ed.], p. 64). The fact that the mark may not as yet have attained a widespread market reputation is of no consequence (Restatement, Torts, § 716, *Comment*[a]). The use of the word “ glad ” by the defendant in connection with the sale of the identical commodity •—• phonograph records -—and commencing in point of time subsequent to plaintiff’s appropriation thereof constitutes an infringement justifying the granting of equitable relief by way of injunction (see General Business Law, § 368-d; *Menendez*v. *Holt,*128 U. S. 514). The fact that defendant persisted in her infringing use despite plaintiff’s request that she desist—made at the very early stages of defendants’ business operation — reinforces my conclusion that the plaintiff is entitled to relief.