alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

EPA420-B-03-010

October 2003

Boundary Scenarios for 8-hour Ozone Nonattainment Areas

Previously Designated as Nonattainment or Maintenance

for the 1-hour Ozone Standard

Reference Document for Commenters

Note: The purpose of this reference document is to assist the public in understanding Section

VI.A.2. of EPA’s proposal entitled, “Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments for the New

8-hour Ozone and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Miscellaneous Revisions

for Existing Areas.” The transportation conformity proposal was signed on October 22, 2003.

Section VI. of the proposal is entitled, “Regional Conformity Tests in 8-hour Ozone Areas That

Have 1-hour Ozone SIPs.”

The hypothetical boundary scenarios described in Section VI. are for 8-hour ozone

nonattainment areas that were also designated nonattainment under the 1-hour ozone air quality

standard. These boundary scenarios are important for applying the proposed conformity test

options in these areas. The proposed test options would apply for such areas before 8-hour

ozone SIPs and motor vehicle emissions budgets are available for conformity purposes.

SCENARIO 1: 8-hour and 1-hour Ozone Boundaries Are Exactly the Same

In this scenario, the 8-hour and 1-hour ozone boundaries cover exactly the same geographical

area.

SCENARIO 2: 8-hour Ozone Boundary Is Smaller Than and Within the 1-hour Ozone

Boundary

In this scenario, the 8-hour ozone nonattainment area is smaller than and completely

encompassed by the 1-hour ozone boundary.

1hr and 8hr

1 hr

8 hr
2

SCENARIO 3: 8-hour Ozone Boundary Is Larger Than the 1-hour Ozone Boundary

In this scenario, the entire 1-hour ozone boundary is within a larger 8-hour ozone nonattainment

area.

SCENARIO 4: 8-hour Ozone Boundary Overlaps With the 1-hour Ozone Boundary

In this scenario, the 8-hour and 1-hour ozone boundaries partially overlap.

8hr

1hr 

8 hr 1 hr
#### Abraham I. Rosner, Appellant, v. V. E. Realty Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Order, entered on December 29, 1961, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 88 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. J. RES. 88

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
   Education relating to ``Improving Income Driven Repayment for the 
  William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program and the Federal Family 
                    Education Loan (FFEL) Program''.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress disapproves the 
rule submitted by the Department of Education relating to ``Improving 
Income Driven Repayment for the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan 
Program and the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program'' (88 Fed. 
Reg. 43820 (July 10, 2023)), and such rule shall have no force or 
effect.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             H. J. RES. 88

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

  Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
    United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 
   Education relating to ``Improving Income Driven Repayment for the 
  William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program and the Federal Family 
                    Education Loan (FFEL) Program''.
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Cody Crymes v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00206-CR

Trial court case number: 17166

Trial court: 253rd District Court of Chambers County

On June 19, 2015, the State filed the State’s Motion to Abate Appeal and Supplement 

Clerk’s Record. We DENY the request to abate the appeal.

We ORDER the district clerk to supplement the record within 10 days of the date of this 

order with the certification of defendant’s right to appeal.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/_Harvey Brown

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 23, 2015
Exhibit










Exhibit 10.1




DICK’S SPORTING GOODS, INC.
AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2002 STOCK AND INCENTIVE PLAN


The Board of Directors of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. (the “Company”) approved and adopted the following amendments (the “Amendments”) to the Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. Amended and Restated 2002 Stock and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) as of March 14, 2017:


		
	1.
	The second paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:




If Shares under any Award are not issued for any reason, including termination of Awards by expiration, forfeiture, cancellation or otherwise, or are settled in cash in lieu of Shares, such Shares shall, unless this Plan shall have been terminated, become available for future grant under this Plan; provided, however, that any Shares delivered or deemed delivered, by attestation or otherwise, to the Company in payment of any obligation, including the exercise price of any Option, the purchase price for any Shares, or for any tax obligation shall not again be made available for issuance under this Plan.
		
	2.
	The last paragraph of Section 9 of the Plan shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:




Notwithstanding the foregoing or any provisions of this Plan to the contrary, any broker-assisted cashless exercise shall comply with the requirements for equity classification of Paragraph 35 of FASB Statement No. 123(R) and any withholding satisfied through a net-settlement shall be limited to the minimum statutory withholding requirements (except as otherwise approved by the Administrator).  
Except as expressly set forth in the Amendments, all other provisions of the Plan remain in full force and effect.


Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.


	
		
	By:
	/s/ John E. Hayes, III

	Name:
	John E. Hayes, III



	Title:
	Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
#### TILLY, Respondent, v. VON ARNIM, Appelant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Secnd Department.

March 2. 1906.)

Action by tlfred Tilly against Otto F. Von Arnim.

No pinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with osts.
EXHIBIT 15








November 9, 1999









The Cleveland Electric
Illuminating Company
76 South Main Street
Akron, OH  44308

Gentlemen:

We are aware that The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company has
incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements No. 33-
55513, No. 333-47651 and No. 333-72891 its Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1999, which includes our report dated
November 9, 1999 covering the unaudited interim financial
information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the
Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of
the registration statements prepared or certified by our firm or
a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.

                                 Very truly yours,




                                 ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Curley, Appellant, v. Ross E. Herold, as Superintendant of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

'Motion pursuant to CPLR 5520 (subd. [a]) for extension of time to cure omission to file copy of notice of appeal in the office of the Clerk of the County of Clinton granted, and time extended to March 15, 1967. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Video: Safeguarding Children of Arrested Parents Training      

# Video: Safeguarding Children of Arrested Parents Training

This training video shows children telling their own stories about how they were affected by the arrest of a parent, and demonstrates the core principles from the Model Policy for Safeguarding Children of Arrested Parents (PDF, 38 pages), illustrating actions law enforcement officers can take to reduce trauma. 

http://www.bja.gov/programs/cap-video.html?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
8.708 Shipping. ( a ) Delivery is accomplished when a shipment is placed aboard the vehicle of the initial carrier. The time of delivery is the date shipment is released to and accepted by the initial carrier.
( b ) Shipment is normally under Government bills of lading. However, for small orders, ordering offices may specify other shipment methods.
( c ) When shipments are under Government bills of lading, the bills of lading may accompany orders or be otherwise furnished promptly. Failure of an ordering office to furnish bills of lading or to designate a method of transportation may result in an excusable delay in delivery.
( d ) AbilityOne participating nonprofit agencies shall include transportation costs for small shipments paid by the nonprofit agencies as an item on the invoice. The ordering office shall reimburse the nonprofit agencies for these costs.
[48 FR 42129, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 19713, May 30, 1986; 59 FR 67028, Dec. 28, 1994; 73 FR 53995, Sept. 17, 2008]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Strategic Plan: Updated Federal Health IT Strategic Plan 2015-2020      

# Strategic Plan: Updated Federal Health IT Strategic Plan 2015-2020

ONC, in collaboration with more than 35 federal partners, released the updated Federal Health IT Strategic Plan 2015-2020. The plan sets a blueprint for improving health IT infrastructure, transforming health care delivery, and improving individual and community health. 

http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2015pres/09/20150921b.html?utm_source=youth.gov%60&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Ending Housing Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Individuals and Families      

# Ending Housing Discrimination against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Individuals and Families

This HUD website maintains a list of states that enumerate sexual orientation and gender identity in their state fair housing laws. It also provides information and resources to report housing discrimination.

http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/LGBT_Housing_Discrimination
SENSITIVE SECURITY INFORMATION

SENSITIVE SECURITY

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

Aircraft Certification Service

Wash in ton, DC

U.S. Departmen I It.. I In

of Transportatio "'ITIA';;"?,1 :1

Federal Aviati n {()'tJ---

Administratio ATI1

ROUTI"G SYMBOL

DATE: December __ , 2009

AD 2009-_-_#; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-258-AD

Sensitive security airworthiness directive (AD) 2009-_- __ is sent to all owners and

operators of Airbus Model A300, A300-600, A31 0, A318, A319, A320, A321, A330-200, A330-

A340-200, A340-300, A340-500, A340-600, and A380-800 series airplanes.

Background

UTlNG S,'MilOL

5c:'}· 1-:'"!'..7...

we

UT NG S MOOL

DAT"-

bernf'o~'1

"OUTING SYMOOL

~,,1h-1

NlTIAl.'""G

C· C-lr--

Al~

')0:[/1,0

>'G S'''ElOL

IItJI,\-! \

It

'"

-Jr;

I<OUIING SYMBOL

flNM.-1 b I

NrrlAU"S,G Airbus Service Bulletin Date

A310-25-2206 September 21, 2009

A300-25-0486 September 2\, 2009

A300-25-6218 September 21, 2009

A320-25-1666 September 2\, 2009

A330-25-3424 September 21, 2009

A340-25-4326 September 21, 2009

Explanation of Relevant Service Information

The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Teclmical Agent for the Me

States of the European Community, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2009-0252, dated

November 26, 2009 (referred to after this as "the MeAl"), to correct an unsafe condition for the

specified products. The EASA advises that the cockpit security door on certain Airbus airplanes

identified above could be opened with a simple tool. This condition, if not corrected, could

compromise the security of the flight deck.

We reviewed the following Airbus service bulletins identified in the following table.

Airbus Service Bulletins

m'T'All"S1C;

t)AT~

\VARNING: This record contains Sensitive Security Information that is controlled under 49 CFR parts \5 and 1520.

part of this record may be disclosed to persons \'.':ithouta "need to know," as defined in 49 CFR parts \5 and 1520, except

with the written pcrnrission of the Administrator of me Transponation Security Administration or the Secretary of

Transportation. Unauthorized release may result in civil penalty or other action. For U.S. government agencies, public

disclosure is governed by 5 V.S.C. 552 and 49 CFR parts 15 and \520.
Final Rule: Confidential Determinations for Part 98 Data 

Meeting Documentation: EPA – Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Meeting 

Date Staff Contact Information 

(Name, email, phone #) 

Name of Organization (Attach list of all 

attendees names and emails if possible) 

Summary of Discussion (e.g., 

applicability, reporting 

requirements, etc.)

Written Comments 

Provided? 

Did they also 

submit to Docket? 

Date sent to EPACCD 

11/16/10 Jennifer Bohman

bohman.jennifer@epa.gov

202-343-9548 

Suzanne Michel, FTC

Peter Richmond, FTC 

David Myers, FTC 

Cindy Anderson, EPA 

Jennifer Bohman, EPA 

Amy Branning, EPA 

Jessica Gordon, EPA 

Lisa Grogan-McColluch, EPA 

Sarah Ohrel, EPA 

A meeting was held to 

discuss FTC’s comments 

on the proposed rule. 

No. NA
908.7115 Forms. ( a ) DOE forms shall be obtained by DOE offices in accordance with the DOE Guide 242.1-1, DOE Forms Management, for use with DOE Order 200.1, Information Management Program.
( b ) Standard, optional, and certain other agency forms as listed in the GSA Supply Catalog will be obtained by DOE offices in accordance with FPMR 41 CFR 101-26.302.
( c ) Marginally punched continuous forms shall be obtained in accordance with FPMR 41 CFR 101-26.703.
[49 FR 11945, Mar. 28, 1984, as amended at 59 FR 9105, Feb. 25, 1994; 74 FR 36362, July 22, 2009]
833.106-70 Solicitation provisions. ( a ) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 852.233-70, Protest Content/Alternative Dispute Resolution, in solicitations expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, including those for commercial items.
( b ) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 852.233-71, Alternate Protest Procedure, in solicitations expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, including those for commercial items.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 14a0285n.06

No. 13-3974

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

KEVIN D. TODD,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED 

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF 

OHIO

BEFORE: GILMAN, GIBBONS, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Kevin D. Todd appeals his sentence.

Pursuant to a binding plea agreement, Todd pleaded guilty to sexual exploitation of a 

minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). The district court determined that, based on a total 

offense level of 39 and a criminal history category of II, Todd’s guidelines range of 

imprisonment was 292 to 360 months. Under the terms of the plea agreement, Todd was to 

receive a prison sentence of 240 to 300 months. The district court accepted the plea agreement 

and sentenced Todd to 300 months in prison, to be followed by a life term of supervised release.

On appeal, Todd argues that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the 

district court failed to adequately explain its reason for imposing a life term of supervised 

release. We review Todd’s challenge for plain error because defense counsel failed to object to 

the sentence when given the opportunity to do so by the district court at the conclusion of the 

sentencing hearing. See United States v. Vonner, 516 F.3d 382, 386 (6th Cir. 2008) (en banc). 
No. 13-3974

United States v. Todd

- 2 -

To establish plain error, Todd must show that an obvious or clear error affected his substantial 

rights as well as the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings. See id.

The district court did not plainly err in imposing Todd’s sentence. The court adequately 

explained that the life term of supervised release was warranted based on the heinous nature of 

Todd’s actions and the need to protect the public. Given that the arguments raised during 

sentencing were straightforward and conceptually simple and the life term of supervised release 

was the recommended term under the guidelines, see USSG § 5D1.2(b)(2), the district court was 

not required to further explain its sentencing decision. See United States v. Duane, 533 F.3d 

441, 451-52 (6th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, we affirm Todd’s sentence.
#### Edward P. Bunck, appellant, v. Frank B. Downing, appellee.

Gen. No. 30,717.

Action upon promissory note. Judgment against plaintiff for costs. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Theodore F. Ehler, Judge, presiding. Heard in the second division of this court for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Reversed with findings of fact and judgment here.

Opinion filed May 25, 1926.

Edward L. England, for appellant;

Homer A. Dodge, of counsel. Robert F. Munsell, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of ihq court.