[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 32 (Friday, February 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10269-10278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03391]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2019-0372; FRL-10019-29-OW]


National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) 2021 
Issuance of the Multi-Sector General Permit for Stormwater Discharges 
Associated With Industrial Activity

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final permit issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: All 10 of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Regions 
are finalizing the 2021 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System 
(NPDES) general permit for stormwater discharges associated with 
industrial activity, also referred to as the ``2021 Multi-Sector 
General Permit (MSGP)'' or the ``final permit.'' This final permit 
replaces EPA's administratively continued 2015 MSGP that expired on 
June 3, 2020. EPA is issuing this permit for five (5) years to provide 
permit coverage to eligible operators in all areas of the country where 
EPA is the NPDES permitting authority, including Idaho (until July 1, 
2021), Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Indian country lands, 
Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and most U.S. territories and 
protectorates. This Federal Register document summarizes the final 
permit. EPA encourages the public to read the final permit and 
accompanying fact sheet to better understand the final permit. The 
final permit and fact sheet can be found at https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-industrial-activities.

DATES: The final permit becomes effective on March 1, 2021. This 
effective date is necessary to provide dischargers with the immediate 
opportunity to comply with Clean Water Act (CWA) requirements in light 
of the expiration of the 2015 MSGP on June 3, 2020. In accordance with 
40 CFR part 23, the 2021 MSGP shall be considered issued for the 
purpose of judicial review on March 5, 2021. Under CWA section 509(b), 
judicial review of this general permit can be requested by filing a 
petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals within 120 
days after the permit is issued. Under CWA section 509(b)(2), the 
requirements in this permit may not be challenged later in civil or 
criminal proceedings to enforce these requirements. In addition, this 
permit may not be challenged in other agency proceedings. Deadlines for 
submittal of a Notice of Intent (NOI) are provided in Part 1.3 of the 
2021 MSGP. The 2021 MSGP also provides additional dates for compliance 
with the terms of the permit.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on the final 
permit, contact the appropriate EPA Regional office listed in Section 
I.F of this document, or Emily Halter, EPA Headquarters, Office of 
Water, Office of Wastewater Management (4203M), 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-564-3324; email 
address: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#274f464b53425509424a4e4b5e6742574609404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d252c2139283f6328202421340d283d2c632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This section is organized as follows:

Table of Contents

I. General Information
    A. Does this action apply to me?
    B. How can I get copies of these documents and other related 
information?
    C. Who are the EPA regional contacts for the final permit?
II. Background of the Industrial Stormwater Program
III. Summary of the 2021 MSGP
    A. 2015 MSGP Litigation and National Academies Study
    B. Summary of Significant Final Permit Changes From the 2015 
MSGP
    C. Summary of Changes From Proposed 2020 MSGP
IV. Implementation Assistance
V. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
VI. 2021 MSGP Incremental Cost Analysis and Future Cost-Benefit 
Considerations
VII. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and 
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
VIII. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address 
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
Populations
IX. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments
X. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    The final permit covers stormwater discharges to waters of the 
United States from industrial facilities in the 30 sectors shown below:

    Sector A--Timber Products.
    Sector B--Paper and Allied Products Manufacturing.
    Sector C--Chemical and Allied Products Manufacturing.

[[Page 10270]]

    Sector D--Asphalt Paving and Roofing Materials Manufactures and 
Lubricant Manufacturers.
    Sector E--Glass, Clay, Cement, Concrete, and Gypsum Product 
Manufacturing.
    Sector F--Primary Metals.
    Sector G--Metal Mining (Ore Mining and Dressing).
    Sector H--Coal Mines and Coal Mining-Related Facilities.
    Sector I--Oil and Gas Extraction.
    Sector J--Mineral Mining and Dressing.
    Sector K--Hazardous Waste Treatment Storage or Disposal.
    Sector L--Landfills and Land Application Sites.
    Sector M--Automobile Salvage Yards.
    Sector N--Scrap Recycling Facilities.
    Sector O--Steam Electric Generating Facilities.
    Sector P--Land Transportation.
    Sector Q--Water Transportation.
    Sector R--Ship and Boat Building or Repairing Yards.
    Sector S--Air Transportation Facilities.
    Sector T--Treatment Works.
    Sector U--Food and Kindred Products.
    Sector V--Textile Mills, Apparel, and other Fabric Products 
Manufacturing.
    Sector W--Furniture and Fixtures.
    Sector X--Printing and Publishing.
    Sector Y--Rubber, Miscellaneous Plastic Products, and 
Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries.
    Sector Z--Leather Tanning and Finishing.
    Sector AA--Fabricated Metal Products.
    Sector AB--Transportation Equipment, Industrial or Commercial 
Machinery.
    Sector AC--Electronic, Electrical, Photographic and Optical 
Goods.
    Sector AD--Reserved for Facilities Not Covered Under Other 
Sectors and Designated by the Director.

    Coverage under the final 2021 MSGP is available to operators of 
eligible facilities located in areas where the EPA is the CWA section 
402 permitting authority. A list of eligible areas is included in 
Appendix C of the final 2021 MSGP.

B. How can I get copies of these documents and other related 
information?

    1. Docket. EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2019-0372. Although all documents in the docket 
are listed in an index, some information is not publicly available, 
i.e., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Publicly available docket 
materials are available electronically through www.regulations.gov. Out 
of an abundance of caution for members of the public and EPA staff, the 
EPA Docket Center and Reading Room are currently closed to the public, 
with limited exceptions, to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19. 
When the EPA Docket Center and Reading Room re-open, publicly available 
docket materials will be available in hard copy at the Water Docket in 
the EPA Docket Center, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution 
Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is 
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 
legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is 
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Water Docket is (202) 
566-2426.
    2. Electronic Access. Electronic versions of this final permit and 
accompanying fact sheet are available on the EPA's NPDES website at 
https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-industrial-activities.
    An electronic version of the public docket is available through the 
EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may 
use EPA Dockets at https://www.regulations.gov to view public comments, 
access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, 
and to access those documents in the public docket that are available 
electronically. For additional information about the EPA's public 
docket, visit the Agency's Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. Although not all docket materials may be available 
electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available 
docket materials through the Docket Facility identified in Section 
I.B.1.

C. Who are the EPA regional contacts for the final permit?

    For the EPA Region 1, contact David Gray at: (617) 918-1577 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3a4b1a2baeda7a2b5aaa7a983a6b3a2eda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="284f5a4951064c495e414c42684d5849064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For the EPA Region 2, contact Stephen Venezia at: (212) 637-3856 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88feede6edf2e1e9a6fbfcedf8e0ede6c8edf8e9a6efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="384e5d565d425159164b4c5d48505d56785d4859165f574e">[email protected]</span></a>, or for Puerto Rico contact Sergio Bosques at: 
(787) 977-5838 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#395b564a484c5c4a174a5c4b5e5056795c4958175e564f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fede0fcfefaeafca1fceafde8e6e0cfeaffeea1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For the EPA Region 3, contact Carissa Moncavage at: (215) 814-5798 
or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81eceeefe2e0f7e0e6e4afe2e0f3e8f2f2e0c1e4f1e0afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="791416171a180f181e1c571a180b100a0a18391c0918571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For the EPA Region 4, contact Mike Mitchell at: (404) 562-9303 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99f4f0edfaf1fcf5f5b7f4f0faf1f8fcf5d9fce9f8b7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="660b0f12050e030a0a480b0f050e07030a2603160748010910">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For the EPA Region 5, contact Andrea Schaller at: 312-886-0746 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f784949f969b9b9285d9969993859296b7928796d9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c0f1f141d1010190e521d12180e191d3c190c1d521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For the EPA Region 6, contact Nasim Jahan at: (214) 665-7522 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d272c252c2363232c3e24200d283d2c632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8d2d9d0d9d696d6d9cbd1d5f8ddc8d996dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For the EPA Region 7, contact Mark Matthews at: (913) 551-7635 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c616d787864697b7f22616d7e674c697c6d226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff929e8b8b979a888cd1929e8d94bf9a8f9ed1989089">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For the EPA Region 8, contact Paul Garrison at: (303) 312-6016 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#214640535348524e4f0f5140544d614451400f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0f686e7d7d667c6061217f6e7a634f6a7f6e21686079">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For the EPA Region 9, contact Eugene Bromley at: (415) 972-3510 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ceefee3e1e0e9f5a2e9f9ebe9e2e9cce9fceda2ebe3fa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d4f5f42404148540348584a4843486d485d4c034a425b">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For the EPA Region 10, contact Margaret McCauley at: (206) 553-1772 
or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cca1afafadb9a0a9b5e2a1adbeabadbea9b88ca9bcade2aba3ba"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="432e202022362f263a6d2e22312422312637032633226d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>.

II. Background of the Industrial Stormwater Program

    Section 405 of the Water Quality Act of 1987 added section 402(p) 
of the CWA, which directed EPA to develop a phased approach to regulate 
stormwater discharges under the NPDES program. EPA published a final 
regulation on the first phase of this program on November 16, 1990, 
establishing permit application requirements for ``stormwater 
discharges associated with industrial activity.'' See 55 FR 48065. In 
that final regulation, EPA defined the term ``stormwater discharge 
associated with industrial activity'' in a comprehensive manner to 
cover a wide variety of facilities. See 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14). EPA 
issues the 2021 MSGP under this statutory and regulatory authority.

III. Summary of the 2021 MSGP

    The 2021 MSGP replaces the administratively continued 2015 MSGP, 
which was issued for a five-year term on June 4, 2015 and expired on 
June 3, 2020 (see 80 FR 34403). EPA proposed a new MSGP for a 90-day 
comment period from March 2 to June 1, 2020 (see 85 FR 12288). Since 
the new MSGP was proposed in 2020, EPA hereinafter refers to the 
proposed permit of the 2021 MSGP as the ``proposed 2020 MSGP.'' EPA 
received 195 total comment letters and 1865 unique comments on the 
proposed 2020 MSGP. EPA considered the comments submitted as part of 
this public process when finalizing 2021 MSGP. Response to comments are 
discussed in detail in a separate document, titled ``2021 MSGP Response 
to Comments,'' which can be found in the docket (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OW-2019-0372).
    The 2021 MSGP covers stormwater discharges from industrial 
facilities in areas where EPA is the NPDES permitting authority in EPA 
Regions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. This permit covers facilities 
in the state of Idaho until the transfer of NPDES Permitting Authority 
to Idaho for stormwater general permits on July 1, 2021. The geographic 
coverage of this permit is listed in Appendix C of the permit. This 
permit authorizes stormwater discharges from industrial facilities in 
30 sectors, as shown in section I.A. of this document.
    Like the 2015 MSGP, the 2021 MSGP is structured in nine parts: 
general

[[Page 10271]]

requirements that apply to all facilities (i.e., eligibility 
requirements, effluent limitations, inspection and monitoring 
requirements, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) 
requirements, and reporting and recordkeeping requirements) (Parts 1-
7); industrial sector-specific conditions (Part 8); and state and 
tribal-specific requirements applicable to facilities located within 
individual states or Indian Country (Part 9). Additionally, the 
appendices provide the paper forms for the Notice of Intent (NOI), the 
Notice of Termination (NOT), the Conditional No Exposure Exclusion 
(also known as the No Exposure Certification or NEC), the Discharge 
Monitoring Report (DMR), and the Annual Report, as well as step-by-step 
procedures for determining eligibility with respect to protecting 
National Historic Preservation Act-protected properties and Endangered 
Species Act (ESA)-listed species and critical habitat, and for 
calculating site-specific, hardness-dependent benchmarks.

A. 2015 MSGP Litigation and National Academies Study

    After the EPA issued the 2015 MSGP, numerous environmental non-
governmental organizations (NGOs) \1\ challenged the permit, two 
industry groups \2\ intervened, and a Settlement Agreement was signed 
in 2016 with all parties. The settlement agreement did not affect the 
2015 MSGP but stipulated several terms and conditions that EPA agreed 
to address in the proposed 2020 MSGP. One key term from the Settlement 
Agreement stipulated that EPA fund a study conducted by the National 
Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's National Research 
Council (NRC) on potential permit improvements, focused primarily on 
monitoring requirements, for consideration in the next MSGP. In the 
Settlement Agreement, EPA agreed that, when drafting the proposed 2020 
MSGP, the Agency would consider the recommendations suggested in the 
completed NRC Study.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Environmental NGOs included Waterkeeper Alliance, 
Apalachicola Riverkeeper, Galveston Baykeeper, Raritan Baykeeper, 
Inc. d/b/a NY/NJ Baykeeper, Snake River Waterkeeper, Ecological 
Rights Foundation, Our Children's Earth Foundation, Puget 
Soundkeeper, Lake Pend Oreille Waterkeeper, and Conservation Law 
Foundation (collectively, ``Petitioners'').
    \2\ Industry intervenors included the Federal Water Quality 
Coalition and the Federal Storm Water Association.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NRC delivered the results of their study, Improving the EPA 
Multi-Sector General Permit for Industrial Stormwater Discharges, in 
February 2019. In Part III of the 2021 MSGP Fact Sheet, titled ``The 
National Research Council (NRC) National Academies of Sciences (NAS) 
Industrial Stormwater Study,'' EPA outlines in detail how the Agency 
considered each recommendation from the NRC study in the proposed 
permit and which proposed requirements informed by the NRC study the 
Agency finalized in the 2021 MSGP. The NRC study can be found at the 
following website: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25355/improving-the-epa-multi-sector-general-permit-for-industrial-stormwater-discharges.

B. Summary of Significant Final Permit Changes From the 2015 MSGP

    The 2021 MSGP includes several new or modified requirements from 
the 2015 MSGP.
    1. Streamlining of permit. EPA streamlined and simplified language 
throughout the final permit to present the requirements in a more clear 
and readable manner. Regarding the structure of the permit, Part 4 
(Monitoring) was previously Part 6 in the 2015 MSGP; Part 5 (Corrective 
Actions and AIM) was previously Part 4 in the 2015 MSGP; and Part 6 
(SWPPP) was previously Part 5 in the 2015 MSGP. Formatting the final 
permit in this new order (Monitoring, followed by Corrective Actions 
and AIM, then SWPPP requirements) provides the information in a 
sequential way as the latter parts often refer back to requirements in 
previous parts of the permit. This new structure should enhance 
understanding of and compliance with the permit's requirements. EPA 
also made a few additional edits to improve permit readability and 
clarity. EPA revised the wording of many eligibility requirements to be 
an affirmative expression of the requirement instead of assumed 
ineligibility unless a condition was met. For example, Part 1.1.6.2 
reads ``If you discharge to an `impaired water' . . . you must do one 
of the following:''. In comparison, the 2015 MSGP reads ``If you are a 
new discharger or a new source . . . you are ineligible for coverage 
under this permit to discharge to an `impaired water' . . . unless you 
do one of the following:''. EPA also numbered permit conditions that 
were previously in bullet form to make it easier to follow and 
reference the permit conditions. Finally, the language of the final 
permit was changed from passive to active voice where appropriate 
(e.g., ``Samples must be collected . . .'' now reads ``You must collect 
samples . . .'').
    2. Public sign of permit coverage. The 2021 MSGP includes a new 
requirement that operators must post a sign of permit coverage at a 
safe, publicly accessible location in close proximity to the facility. 
This notice must include basic information about the facility (e.g., 
the NPDES ID number), information that informs the public on how to 
request the facility's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), 
and how to contact the facility and EPA if stormwater pollution is 
observed in the discharge. This requirement will make the procedure for 
requesting a SWPPP easily understandable by the public and improve 
transparency of the process to report possible violations. Operators 
are not required to post a sign of their permit coverage where other 
laws or local ordinances prohibit such signage. See Part 1.3.5 of the 
permit and fact sheet.
    3. Consideration of stormwater control measure enhancements for 
major storm events. The 2021 MSGP requires that operators consider 
implementing enhanced stormwater control measures for facilities that 
could be impacted by major storm events, such as hurricanes, storm 
surge, and flood events. EPA is not requiring operators to implement 
additional controls if the operator determines such controls to be 
unnecessary, but EPA is requiring operators to consider the benefits of 
selecting and designing control measures that reduce risks to their 
industrial facility and the potential impact of pollutants in 
stormwater discharges caused by major storm events. See Part 2.1.1 of 
the permit and fact sheet.
    4. Monitoring changes.
    <bullet> Indicator monitoring for pH, TSS, and COD for subsectors 
without benchmark monitoring. The 2021 MSGP includes a new provision 
that requires certain operators to conduct indicator analytical 
monitoring for three parameters--pH, Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and 
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)--quarterly for the duration of the permit. 
This requirement applies to all operators in the following subsectors 
that do not have sector-specific benchmark monitoring requirements in 
the 2021 MSGP: B2, C5, D2, E3, F5, I1, J3, L2, N2, O1, P1, R1, T1, U3, 
V1, W1, X1, Y2, Z1, AB1, AC1, and AD1. Indicator monitoring is 
``report-only'' and does not have a threshold or baseline value for 
comparison, therefore no follow-up action is triggered or required 
based on the sampling results. The requirement in Part 2.2.1 that the 
operator's discharge be controlled as necessary such that the receiving 
water of the United States will meet applicable water quality standards 
still applies. These three parameters will provide operators and EPA 
with a baseline and comparable understanding of industrial

[[Page 10272]]

stormwater discharge quality, broader water quality problems, and 
stormwater control measure effectiveness at these facilities. See Part 
4.2.1.1.a of the permit and fact sheet.
    <bullet> Indicator monitoring for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 
(PAHs) for certain sectors/activities. The 2021 MSGP includes a new 
provision that requires certain operators to conduct report-only 
indicator analytical monitoring for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 
(PAHs) bi-annually (twice per year) during their first and fourth years 
of permit coverage. This requirement applies to the following 
operators: Operators in all sectors with stormwater discharges from 
paved surfaces that will be sealed or re-sealed with coal-tar sealcoat 
where industrial activities are located during coverage under this 
permit; operators in sectors A (facilities that manufacture, use, or 
store creosote or creosote-treated wood in areas that are exposed to 
precipitation), C (SIC Code 2911), D, F, H, I, M, O, P (SIC Codes 4011, 
4013, and 5171), Q (SIC Code 4493), R, and S. Indicator monitoring is 
``report-only'' and does not have a threshold or baseline value for 
comparison, therefore no follow-up action is triggered or required 
based on the sampling results. The requirement in Part 2.2.1 that the 
operator's discharge be controlled as necessary such that the receiving 
water of the United States will meet applicable water quality standards 
still applies. EPA determined that the sectors and activities listed 
above are likely to have industrial activities with potential petroleum 
hydrocarbon exposure to precipitation that could result in the 
discharge of PAHs in stormwater based on a review of EPA's sector-
specific fact sheets and a detailed literature review included in the 
docket (ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2019-0372). PAH monitoring data will provide 
operators and EPA with a baseline and comparable understanding of 
industrial stormwater discharge quality with respect to discharges of 
PAHs at these facilities. EPA plans to use the indicator monitoring 
data collected to conduct an initial quantitative assessment of the 
levels of PAHs in industrial stormwater, further identify industrial 
activities with the potential to discharge PAHs in stormwater, and 
inform future consideration of PAH benchmark monitoring for sectors 
with the potential to discharge PAHs in stormwater. See Part 4.2.1.1.b 
of the permit and fact sheet.
    <bullet> Updating the benchmark monitoring schedule. The 2021 MSGP 
requires that applicable operators conduct benchmark monitoring 
quarterly in their first and fourth years of permit coverage. EPA 
reminds operators and the public that benchmark thresholds are not 
effluent limitations. This permit requires benchmark monitoring as 
gauge of the performance of facilities' stormwater control measures. 
Benchmark monitoring begins in the first full quarter of permit 
coverage for four quarters. In the 2015 MSGP, an operator that did not 
exceed the four-quarter annual average for a given parameter in the 
first four quarters of permit coverage could discontinue benchmark 
monitoring for that parameter for the remainder of the permit. Under 
the 2021 MSGP, an operator that does not exceed the four-quarter annual 
average for a given parameter in the first four quarters of permit 
coverage can now discontinue benchmark monitoring for that parameter 
for the next two years (i.e., the next eight quarters). Quarterly 
benchmark monitoring then resumes for all parameters for another four 
quarters in the fourth year of permit coverage, and if the operator 
does not exceed the four-quarter annual average for a given parameter, 
it can discontinue benchmark monitoring for that parameter for the 
remainder of their permit coverage. If, during either the first or 
fourth year of monitoring, the annual average for any parameter exceeds 
the benchmark threshold, the operator must comply with Part 5 
(Additional Implementation Measures responses and deadlines) and 
continue quarterly benchmark monitoring for four quarters until results 
indicate that annual average for the parameter(s) is no longer 
exceeded. Under the new schedule, regardless of when the operator 
discontinued monitoring for any benchmark parameter, monitoring resumes 
for all parameters for four quarters in the fourth year of permit 
coverage, unless the permit has already expired. It is possible that an 
operator with continued benchmark exceedances in years two and three of 
permit coverage will be required to continue monitoring through their 
second and third years of permit coverage. In the scenario where the 
operator receives results in their third year of permit coverage that 
the benchmark threshold is no longer exceeded, the operator is still 
required to monitor again in their fourth year of permit coverage.
    The principle underpinning this schedule is that the relief period 
from benchmark monitoring between the first and fourth year decreases 
if benchmark exceedances continue and additional monitoring is 
required. During this time, operators may also be conducting continued 
benchmark monitoring in compliance with AIM for certain parameters that 
have ongoing exceedances. The extended benchmark monitoring schedule 
under the 2021 MSGP will ensure that operators have current data on 
their industrial stormwater discharges and stormwater control measure 
effectiveness throughout their permit coverage and will help identify 
potential adverse effects from modifications in facility operations and 
personnel over time. See Part 4.2.2.3 of the permit and fact sheet.
    <bullet> Updating benchmark values. EPA updated the benchmark 
monitoring thresholds in the 2021 MSGP for aluminum, copper for 
discharges to freshwater, selenium for discharges to freshwater, and 
cadmium based on revised current CWA section 304(a) national 
recommended aquatic life water quality criteria and suspended the 
benchmark monitoring thresholds for magnesium and iron based on lack of 
documented acute toxicity. The 2021 MSGP also allows operators who 
exceed the revised benchmark thresholds for discharges to freshwater 
for aluminum and copper to demonstrate to EPA that their discharges do 
not result in an exceedance of a facility-specific value calculated by 
the operator using the national recommended water quality criteria 
multi-variable models in-lieu of the applicable 2021 MSGP benchmark 
threshold. See Parts 4.2.2 and 8 of the permit and fact sheet.
    EPA also received some comments related to developing wet-weather 
criteria. At this time, EPA does not plan to develop wet-weather 
criteria as the Agency believes aquatic life water quality criteria are 
appropriate protective values for ambient waters and MSGP's benchmark 
thresholds. The Agency may consider the validity of exploring a wet-
weather criteria approach in the future, however.
    <bullet> Additional Implementation Measures. The 2021 MSGP includes 
revisions to the Additional Implementation Measures (AIM) requirements 
for benchmark monitoring exceedances that were included in the proposed 
2020 MSGP. EPA revised these provisions to address concerns raised in 
public comments. Both the proposed 2020 MSGP and the final 2021 MSGP 
maintain a three-level structure of advancement and responses triggered 
by benchmark exceedances and keep follow-up actions clear, timely, and 
proportional to exceedance frequency and duration. The final 2021 MSGP 
AIM requirements reduce costs and complexity from the proposal by 
creating stepwise, sequential advancement through the AIM levels

[[Page 10273]]

with clear ``resetting'' to baseline status if benchmark thresholds and 
responses are met within the required deadlines. EPA reminds operators 
and the public that benchmark thresholds are not effluent limitations. 
This permit requires benchmark monitoring as a gauge of the performance 
of facilities' stormwater control measures. The other corrective action 
conditions, subsequent action deadlines, and documentation requirements 
in Part 5.1 remain the same as in the 2015 MSGP.
    In Part 5.2, AIM is triggered by an exceedance of a benchmark 
monitoring parameter, which can occur from two ``triggering events'': 
Either an exceedance of the four-quarterly annual average for a 
parameter, or from fewer than four quarterly samples if a single sample 
or the sum of any sample results within the sampling year exceeds the 
benchmark threshold by more than four times for a parameter (this 
result indicates that an exceedance of the annual average is 
mathematically certain).
    There are three AIM levels in the 2021 MSGP: AIM Level 1, Level 2, 
and Level 3. All operators subject to benchmark monitoring requirements 
begin in baseline status at the start of their permit coverage. An 
operator would progress linearly through the three AIM levels if an 
exceedance triggering event occurs and continues. If an exceedance 
triggering event occurs while in baseline status, an operator would 
enter AIM Level 1. If a triggering event occurs while in Level 1, an 
operator proceeds to AIM Level 2. If a triggering event occurs while in 
Level 2, an operator proceeds to AIM Level 3. The operator is required 
to respond with increasingly robust control measures and continued 
benchmark monitoring with each subsequent AIM level. The operator is 
``reset'' to baseline status from any AIM level if benchmark thresholds 
and responses are met within the required deadlines.
    After an exceedance triggering event occurs, an operator must 
continue quarterly monitoring for the parameter(s) that caused the AIM 
triggering event at all affected stormwater discharge points, until 
four additional quarters of monitoring do not result in an exceedance 
triggering event. The deadlines for implementing AIM responses remains 
the same as in the proposed permit for Levels 1 and 2 (within 14 days 
of receipt of lab results, unless infeasible, then within 45 days). The 
deadline for Level 3 has been extended to allow time for scheduling and 
completing installation of stormwater control measures (identify the 
schedule for installing controls within 14 days; install controls 
within 60 days, unless infeasible, then within 90 days). EPA may grant 
an extension to the specified deadlines for AIM Level 2 and AIM Level 3 
based on an appropriate demonstration by the operator as outlined in 
Parts 5.2.4.2 (AIM Level 2 Deadlines) and 5.3.5.2 (AIM Level 3 
Deadlines).
    The following five exceptions to the AIM requirements are available 
for an exceedance triggering event at any AIM level: (1) Natural 
background sources, (2) run-on, (3) a one-time abnormal event, (4) a 
demonstration that discharges of copper and aluminum do not result in 
an exceedance of facility-specific criteria using the national 
recommended water quality criteria in-lieu of the applicable MSGP 
benchmark threshold, and 5) a demonstration that the benchmark 
exceedance does not result in any exceedance of an applicable water 
quality standard. AIM requirements increase regulatory certainty while 
ensuring that discharges are sufficiently controlled to protect water 
quality. See Part 5.2 of the permit and fact sheet.
    <bullet> Impaired waters monitoring. Under the 2021 MSGP, operators 
discharging to impaired waters without an EPA-approved or -established 
total maximum daily load (TMDL) must complete annual monitoring for 
discharges of certain pollutants to impaired waters. Impaired waters 
monitoring begins in the first year of permit coverage, starting in the 
first full quarter of permit coverage. Monitoring is required for one 
year at each discharge point for all pollutants for which the waterbody 
is impaired, just as in the 2015 MSGP, after which the operator can 
discontinue monitoring for the next two years for any pollutant that is 
not detected. Annual monitoring must continue for any pollutant that is 
detected in the discharge. Required annual monitoring then resumes in 
the fourth year of permit coverage for one year for those pollutants 
that are both causing impairments and are associated with the 
industrial activity and/or are a required benchmark parameter for the 
operator's subsector(s), including any pollutant(s) for which the 
operator previously discontinued monitoring. After monitoring in the 
fourth year of permit coverage is completed, the operator can 
discontinue monitoring for the duration of their permit coverage for 
any pollutant that is not detected. Again, annual monitoring must 
continue for any pollutant that is detected in the stormwater 
discharge. For waters identified as impaired by acidity or heat, annual 
monitoring must continue where the measured pH or temperature exceeds 
the range of acceptable values assigned to the water consistent with 
applicable water quality standards. The extended impaired waters 
monitoring schedule under the 2021 MSGP will ensure that operators 
affirmatively determine in their first year of permit coverage that a 
parameter causing an impairment is not present at the facility before 
narrowing the list of monitored parameters in the fourth year. The 
updated schedule ensures operators periodically check on their 
potential contributions to impairments in their industrial stormwater 
discharges throughout their permit coverage. See Part 4.2.5.1.a of the 
permit and fact sheet.

C. Summary of Changes From Proposed 2020 MSGP

    After considering information and comments received, the following 
proposed requirements were either not finalized or have been modified 
in the 2021 MSGP relative to the proposed 2020 MSGP:
    1. Expanding the permit eligibility requirement for discharges to a 
federal CERCLA site beyond EPA Region 10. EPA is limiting this 
eligibility criterion to MSGP facilities in EPA Region 10 states and 
Indian Country. EPA has extensive information that stormwater 
discharges are a source of CERCLA site recontamination in Region 10. 
EPA Region 10 has seen both the actual recontamination of Superfund 
Sites from stormwater discharge points and the potential for 
recontamination from source control information gathered at Superfund 
Sites not yet cleaned up. EPA adds in the 2021 MSGP that such 
facilities in Region 10 submit the required information to the EPA 
Regional Office in their NOI via the NPDES eReporting Tool (NeT) for 
the MSGP, which will be reviewed for 30 days prior to the standard 30-
day review period for all NOIs.
    2. Adding an eligibility criterion regarding coal-tar sealcoat. EPA 
is not finalizing the eligibility criterion regarding coal-tar sealcoat 
that was included in the proposed 2020 MSGP. EPA is instead 
implementing a holistic activity-based approach for addressing 
discharges of PAHs in stormwater associated with industrial activity. 
The 2021 MSGP requires industrial facilities to complete ``report-
only'' indicator analytical monitoring bi-annually (i.e., sample twice 
per year) during the first and fourth year of permit coverage for PAHs 
if the facilities initially seal or re-seal coal-tar sealcoat on paved 
surfaces where industrial activities are located, as well other 
specific sectors with potential petroleum hydrocarbon

[[Page 10274]]

exposure to stormwater. The indicator monitoring, specified in Part 
4.2.1 of the 2021 MSGP, is ``report-only'' and does not have a 
threshold or baseline value for comparison nor does it trigger follow-
up actions. This pollutant focused approach to evaluating activities 
and sectors that may contribute PAHs to stormwater discharges will 
allow the Agency to use the indicator monitoring data collected to 
conduct an initial quantitative assessment of the levels of PAHs in 
industrial stormwater, further identify industrial activities with the 
potential to discharge PAHs in stormwater, and inform future 
consideration of potential PAH benchmark monitoring for sectors with 
the potential to discharge PAHs in stormwater.
    3. Modifying the permit authorization timeframe if a new facility 
had a pending enforcement action. EPA is not finalizing the proposed 
extended authorization timeframe that would have extended the review 
period for new NOIs for facilities that have a pending enforcement 
action. However, EPA updates the NOI form in the 2021 MSGP to include 
new questions specifically to identify if there is a pending 
enforcement action related to stormwater.
    4. Providing an inspection-only option in lieu of benchmark 
monitoring. EPA is not finalizing an inspection-only option in the 2021 
MSGP. EPA acknowledges the validity of the NRC Study recommendation to 
provide an alternative compliance option for low-risk facilities; 
however, the Agency does not currently have sufficient information or a 
fully-vetted approach to identify which facilities should be considered 
``low-risk.'' EPA will continue to collect information, including the 
indicator monitoring data required in the 2021 MSGP, to support future 
consideration of an inspection-only option for low-risk facilities.
    5. Requiring universal benchmark monitoring for pH, TSS, and COD 
applicable to all sectors. EPA is not finalizing universal benchmark 
monitoring for pH, TSS, and COD as proposed. Instead, the 2021 MSGP 
includes a new provision that requires certain operators to conduct 
indicator analytical monitoring for pH, TSS, and COD quarterly for the 
duration of the permit. This ``indicator monitoring'' requirement 
applies to all operators in subsectors that do not have sector-specific 
benchmark monitoring requirements in the 2021 MSGP. For the final 
permit, indicator monitoring is ``report-only'' and does not have a 
threshold or baseline value for comparison, therefore no follow-up 
action is triggered or required.
    Requiring sector-specific benchmark monitoring for Sector I (Oil 
and Gas Extraction), Sector P (Land Transportation and Warehousing), 
and Sector R (Ship and Boat Building and Repair Yards). EPA is not 
finalizing benchmark monitoring requirements for Sectors I, P, and R as 
proposed. Upon reconsidering the recommendations of the NRC regarding 
``Sectors Not Subject to Benchmark Monitoring'' and the ``Need for 
Periodic Monitoring Reviews,'' EPA now acknowledges that the NRC 
highlighted Sectors I, P, and R as ``examples [to] show that monitoring 
requirements within the MSGP are not consistently applied'' and that 
``[s]ector-specific monitoring requirements for all sectors should be 
rigorously reviewed to assess whether the monitoring requirements are 
appropriate to ensure control of stormwater pollution and determine 
whether benchmark monitoring requirements should be adjusted.'' 
Contrary to the proposed 2020 MSGP Fact Sheet, which incorrectly 
interpreted the NRC study as ``recommend[ing] that EPA require 
benchmark monitoring for Sectors I, P, and R,'' EPA now recognizes that 
the NRC did not recommend the Agency require benchmarks for these 
sectors, but rather provided them as examples of ``Sectors Not Subject 
to Benchmark Monitoring'' and for highlighting the ``Need for Periodic 
Monitoring Reviews.'' The NRC notes that these examples ``highlight the 
need for updated evaluations of pollutant potential and opportunities 
for pollutant reduction through implementation of additional SCMs.''
    EPA recognizes it misinterpreted the actual recommendations of the 
NRC report in this instance, and the Agency acknowledges the NRC 
Study's recommendation for additional sector-specific data-gathering 
efforts. EPA commits to address the specific recommendations of the NRC 
regarding ``Sectors Not Subject to Benchmark Monitoring'' and the 
``Need for Periodic Monitoring Reviews'' in future proposals of the 
MSGP. At this time, EPA is requiring indicator monitoring for pH, TSS, 
and COD for facilities in subsectors that do not have sector-specific 
benchmark monitoring requirements in the 2021 MSGP, which includes 
subsectors I1, P1, and R1. The indicator monitoring will provide 
operators and EPA with a baseline and comparable understanding of 
industrial stormwater discharge quality, broader water quality 
problems, and stormwater control effectiveness at these facilities, as 
recommended by NRC. EPA will use the results of the indicator 
monitoring to re-assess the need for additional chemical-specific 
benchmark monitoring for the next reissuance of the MSGP.
    6. Modifying the method for determining natural background 
pollutant contributions from the 2015 MSGP. In the 2021 MSGP, EPA 
retains the 2015 MSGP no net contribution method to applying the 
natural background exception for several reasons. The 2015 MSGP method 
is consistent with existing EPA policy concerning the establishment of 
site-specific water quality criteria based on natural background 
conditions. See EPA's Office of Science and Technology memorandum, 
Establishing Site Specific Aquatic Life Criteria Equal to Natural 
Background (November 5, 1997). Additionally, the 2015 MSGP response to 
comments stated that ``the CWA does not allow EPA or states to set a 
site-specific criteria equal to the natural background plus an 
otherwise protective level . . . since doing so could raise the level 
of the pollutant in the water body that might [be] above the natural 
background, which would not be protective of aquatic life, at a 
minimum.'' See Natural Background Exception to Benchmark Monitoring (p. 
5-6) in Response to Public Comments--EPA NPDES 2015 Multi-Sector 
General Permit (MSGP), June 4, 2015. Public comments also raised a 
variety of concerns to EPA that the proposed subtraction method is 
counter to the ``solely attributable'' standard and is not appropriate 
for the MSGP.
    7. Requiring sector-specific fact sheet checklists to be used as 
part of AIM Tier 2 in Appendix Q. EPA is not finalizing Appendix Q in 
the 2021 MSGP. Instead, EPA maintains the existing industrial 
stormwater fact sheet series as guidance. In the 2021 MSGP, after AIM 
Level 2 is triggered, the Level 2 response requires the operator to 
generally implement additional pollution prevention/good housekeeping 
measures. EPA encourages facilities to consult the existing MSGP 
industrial stormwater fact sheet series for guidance on recommended 
stormwater control measures appropriate to comply with AIM Level 2. EPA 
plans to work with external stakeholders to thoroughly revise the 
sector-specific fact sheets.

IV. Implementation Assistance

    Following issuance of the 2021 MSGP, EPA plans to provide further 
assistance to industrial operators and other interested parties on 
various aspects of this new permit. The following activities or 
documents are planned:

[[Page 10275]]

    1. National webcast--EPA will host at least one webcast in February 
2021 that will provide an overview of the 2021 MSGP and an opportunity 
for participants to ask questions. EPA will announce details of all 
webcasts and post webcast recordings on the industrial stormwater 
website at https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-industrial-activities.
    2. Revisions to sector-specific fact sheets for PFAS (guidance)--To 
recognize that industrial facilities can conduct activities that use, 
store, manufacture, transfer, and/or dispose of PFAS-containing 
materials and in alignment with EPA's ``Interim Strategy for Per- and 
Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Federally Issued National Pollutant 
Discharge Elimination System Permits: Recommendations from the PFAS 
NPDES Regional Coordinators Committee,'' EPA revised each of the 
sector-specific fact sheet guidance documents to include practices that 
could be used by operators to minimize PFAS in stormwater discharges. 
EPA will continue to work with stakeholders to further update these 
sector-specific fact sheets with additional emerging stormwater control 
measures that could be used by industrial operators.
    3. Other templates and guidance--EPA will also update existing 
forms and guidance for developing SWPPPs, conducting monitoring, 
performing inspections and visual assessments, and provide tutorials 
and training materials for how to submit forms and data to EPA via NeT-
MSGP.
    4. Benchmark monitoring tracking spreadsheet--EPA will also develop 
a spreadsheet that industrial operators may use to calculate whether 
their quarterly benchmark monitoring data results in an exceedance (AIM 
triggering condition).

V. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    The information collection activities in this permit have been 
submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
under the PRA. The Information Collection Request (ICR) document that 
EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR number 2612.02, OMB Control No. 
2040-0300. You can find a copy of the ICR in the docket for this permit 
(Docket ID No EPA-HQ-OW-2019-0372), and it is briefly summarized here.
    CWA section 402 and the NPDES regulations require collection of 
information primarily used by permitting authorities, permittees 
(operators), and EPA to make NPDES permitting decisions. The burden and 
costs associated with the entire NPDES program are accounted in an 
approved ICR (EPA ICR number 0229.23, OMB control no. 2040-0004). 
Certain changes in this permit require revisions to the ICR to reflect 
changes to the forms and other information collection requirements. EPA 
is reflecting the paperwork burden and costs associated with this 
permit in a separate ICR instead of revising the existing ICR for the 
entire program for administrative reasons.
    EPA is collecting new information as part of the 2021 MSGP. The NOI 
form was updated from the 2015 MSGP to collect new information related 
to the following: Added two questions to determine if PAH indicator 
monitoring in Part 4.2.1.1.b should apply; added questions for 
operators in New Mexico only (based on CWA section 401 conditions 
specific to operators in New Mexico in Part 9 of the permit); added the 
SIC code field for co-located activities; added an additional option 
for Sector G ore answer selections; added an additional option for 
operators to upload/attach their SWPPP (in additional to the existing 
options from the 2015 MSGP); for new dischargers only, added a question 
to indicate if the facility has a pending enforcement action related to 
industrial stormwater by EPA, a state, or a citizen; and added 
questions related to endangered species protection criterion 
determination and Criterion C3 form information, historic properties 
determination, new dischargers to impaired waters eligibility 
information, and CERCLA-related eligibility information to the NOI form 
in NeT-MSGP in lieu of providing information to EPA via email 
communication or in another form to streamline or reduce burden.
    EPA made no changes to the Notice of Termination (NOT) 
requirements. For the Annual Report form, EPA added the requirement to 
include AIM responses for the 2021 MSGP. For the No Exposure 
Certification form, EPA made no changes to the information collected, 
but finalized a change of the acronym for the No Exposure Certification 
from NOE to NEC.
    For the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) form, EPA updated the 
form to match the language included in the permit as follows: Updated 
Part 3.d of the form to allow operators to indicate if monitoring was 
for indicator monitoring; updated Part 3.l of the form to match the 
abnormal event exception; added Part 3.n (demonstration that discharges 
of copper do not result in an exceedance of facility-specific criteria) 
and Part 3.o (demonstration that discharges of aluminum do not result 
in an exceedance of facility-specific criteria) to match the permit.
    Respondents/affected entities: Industrial facilities in the 30 
sectors shown in section I.A of this document in the areas where EPA is 
the NPDES permitting authority.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Compliance with the MSGP's 
information collection and reporting requirements is mandatory for MSGP 
operators.
    Estimated number of respondents: EPA estimates that approximately 
2,508 operators will receive coverage under the 2021 MSGP.
    Frequency of response: Response frequencies in the 2021 MSGP vary 
from once per permit term to quarterly.
    Total estimated burden: EPA estimates that the information 
collection burden of the 2021 MSGP is 68,460 hours per year. Burden is 
defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: EPA estimates that the final information 
collection cost of the 2021 MSGP is $2,461,813 per year.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's 
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. EPA responded to 
ICR-related comments in the final permit.

VI. 2021 MSGP Incremental Cost Analysis and Future Cost-Benefit 
Considerations

    The cost analysis accompanying this final permit monetizes and 
quantifies certain incremental cost impacts of the final permit changes 
as compared to the 2015 MSGP. EPA analyzed each change in the 2021 MSGP 
considering the previous permit's (i.e., the 2015 MSGP) requirements. 
The objective of this cost analysis is to show where or to what extent 
the 2021 MSGP requirements impose an incremental increase in 
administrative and compliance costs (such as sampling and monitoring 
costs) on operators in relation to costs that are already accounted for 
in the 2015 MSGP.
    More broadly, EPA notes that additional unquantified costs and 
benefits result from this action. In developing the next MSGP (or 
another NPDES general permit, as appropriate), EPA plans to estimate 
the broader impacts arising from these actions, including costs and 
benefits. Estimates under consideration may include: (1) Assessing how 
costs and benefits are attributed between the MSGP and applicable water 
quality standards (including TMDLs) that may be in effect; (2) 
developing a new modeling

[[Page 10276]]

framework to assess how regulated entities understand and implement 
control measures relating to existing and new permit obligations; (3) 
examining whether any underlying cost and benefit assumptions need to 
be updated; (4) examining more broadly how EPA can analyze benefits 
when developing permits; (5) developing more robust approaches to 
assessing uncertainties associated with the analytic approaches, 
including how to quantitatively assess uncertainties of key 
assumptions; and (6) developing a framework to analyze the effect of 
cooperative federalism.
    EPA expects the incremental cost impact on entities that will be 
covered under the 2021 MSGP, including small businesses, to be minimal. 
EPA anticipates the incremental administrative and compliance cost for 
new or modified permit requirements will be $338-$632 per operator per 
year; or $1,690-$3,157 per operator over the 5-year permit term. A copy 
of EPA's incremental cost analysis for the final permit, titled ``Cost 
Analysis for the Final 2021 Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP),'' is 
available in the docket (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2019-0372). The cost 
analysis indicates that while there will be an incremental increase in 
the costs of complying with the 2021 MSGP, these costs will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

VII. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and 
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is a ``significant regulatory action.'' Accordingly, EPA 
submitted this action to OMB for review under Executive Orders 12866 
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011), and any changes made in 
response to OMB recommendations will be documented in the docket for 
this action (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2019-0372).

VIII. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes 
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision 
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and 
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission 
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high 
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, 
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income 
populations in the United States.
    This action does not have disproportionately high and adverse human 
health or environmental effects on minority populations, low-income 
populations and/or indigenous peoples, as specified in Executive Order 
12898. EPA has determined that the 2021 MSGP will not have 
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental 
effects on minority or low-income populations because the requirements 
in the permit apply equally to industrial facilities in areas where EPA 
is the permitting authority, and the provisions increase the level of 
environmental protection for all affected populations.

IX. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    This action has tribal implications. However, it will neither 
impose substantial direct compliance costs on federally recognized 
tribal governments, nor preempt tribal law. With limited exceptions, 
EPA directly implements the NPDES program in Indian country as no tribe 
has yet obtained EPA authorization to administer the NPDES program. As 
a result, almost all eligible facilities with stormwater discharges 
associated with industrial activities in Indian country fall under 
EPA's MSGP or may be covered under an individual NPDES permit issued by 
EPA.
    EPA consulted with tribal officials under EPA's Policy on 
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribes early in the process 
of developing this permit to have meaningful and timely input into its 
development to gain an understanding of and, where necessary, to 
address the tribal implications of the permit. A summary of that 
consultation and coordination follows.
    <bullet> June 26, 2019--EPA initiated a tribal consultation and 
coordination process for this action by sending a ``Notice of 
Consultation and Coordination'' letter to all 573 federally recognized 
tribes. The letter invited tribal leaders and designated consultation 
representative(s) to participate in the tribal consultation and 
coordination process. The consultation period was from July 8 to 
September 9, 2019.
    <bullet> July 10, 2019--EPA presented an overview of the current 
2015 MSGP and potential changes for the reissuance of the MSGP to the 
National Tribal Water Council.
    <bullet> August 1, 2019--EPA held an informational webinar for 
tribal representatives. A total of 19 tribal representatives 
participated in the webinar.
    EPA solicited comment from federally recognized tribes early in the 
reissuance process. Tribes and tribal organizations submitted one 
letter and three emails to EPA, and EPA addressed those comments in the 
final permit and/or sent the requested information to the tribes. 
Records of the tribal informational webinar and a consultation summary 
summarizing the written comments submitted by tribes are included in 
the docket for this action (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2019-0372). EPA 
also notes that the Agency completed the CWA section 401 certification 
procedures with all authorized tribes where this permit applies. EPA 
will provide email notification to tribes of the final 2021 MSGP.

X. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' because it is 
not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, 
distribution or use of energy and has not otherwise been designated by 
the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 
as a significant energy action.

    Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.

    This notice of final permit issuance of the Environmental 
Protection Agency was signed on January 15, 2021, by Dennis Deziel, 
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1, pursuant to the settlement 
agreement entered in Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. et al. v. U.S. EPA, No. 
15-2091 (2d Cir.). That notice of final permit issuance with the 
original signature and date is maintained by EPA. For administrative 
purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the 
Federal Register, the undersigned EPA Official re-signs the notice of 
final permit issuance for publication, as an official document of the 
Environmental Protection Agency. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this notice of final permit issuance upon 
publication in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Deborah Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.

    This notice of final permit issuance of the Environmental 
Protection Agency was signed on January 15, 2021, by Jeffrey Gratz, 
Deputy Director, Water

[[Page 10277]]

Division, EPA Region 2, pursuant to the settlement agreement entered in 
Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. et al. v. U.S. EPA, No. 15-2091 (2d Cir.). 
That notice of final permit issuance with the original signature and 
date is maintained by EPA. For administrative purposes only, and in 
compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the 
undersigned EPA Official re-signs the notice of final permit issuance 
for publication, as an official document of the Environmental 
Protection Agency. This administrative process in no way alters the 
legal effect of this notice of final permit issuance upon publication 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Jeffrey Gratz,
Deputy Director, Water Division, EPA Region 2.

    This notice of final permit issuance of the Environmental 
Protection Agency was signed on January 15, 2021, by Carmen Guerrero-
Perez, Director, Caribbean Environmental Protection Division, EPA 
Region 2, pursuant to the settlement agreement entered in Waterkeeper 
Alliance, Inc. et al. v. U.S. EPA, No. 15-2091 (2d Cir.). That notice 
of final permit issuance with the original signature and date is 
maintained by EPA. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance 
with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the 
undersigned EPA Official re-signs the notice of final permit issuance 
for publication, as an official document of the Environmental 
Protection Agency. This administrative process in no way alters the 
legal effect of this notice of final permit issuance upon publication 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Carmen Guerrero-Perez,
Director, Caribbean Environmental Protection Division, EPA Region 2.

    This notice of final permit issuance of the Environmental 
Protection Agency was signed on January 15, 2021, by Catherine Libertz, 
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 3, pursuant to the settlement 
agreement entered in Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. et al. v. U.S. EPA, No. 
15-2091 (2d Cir.). That notice of final permit issuance with the 
original signature and date is maintained by EPA. For administrative 
purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the 
Federal Register, the undersigned EPA Official re-signs the notice of 
final permit issuance for publication, as an official document of the 
Environmental Protection Agency. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this notice of final permit issuance upon 
publication in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Catherine Libertz,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 3.

    This notice of final permit issuance of the Environmental 
Protection Agency was signed on January 15, 2021, by Jeaneanne Gettle, 
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 4, pursuant to the settlement 
agreement entered in Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. et al. v. U.S. EPA, No. 
15-2091 (2d Cir.). That notice of final permit issuance with the 
original signature and date is maintained by EPA. For administrative 
purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the 
Federal Register, the undersigned EPA Official re-signs the notice of 
final permit issuance for publication, as an official document of the 
Environmental Protection Agency. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this notice of final permit issuance upon 
publication in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Jeaneanne Gettle,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 4.

    This notice of final permit issuance of the Environmental 
Protection Agency was signed on January 15, 2021, by Tera Fong, 
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 5, pursuant to the settlement 
agreement entered in Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. et al. v. U.S. EPA, No. 
15-2091 (2d Cir.). That notice of final permit issuance with the 
original signature and date is maintained by EPA. For administrative 
purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the 
Federal Register, the undersigned EPA Official re-signs the notice of 
final permit issuance for publication, as an official document of the 
Environmental Protection Agency. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this notice of final permit issuance upon 
publication in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Tera Fong,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 5.

    This notice of final permit issuance of the Environmental 
Protection Agency was signed on January 15, 2021, by Charles Maguire, 
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 6, pursuant to the settlement 
agreement entered in Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. et al. v. U.S. EPA, No. 
15-2091 (2d Cir.). That notice of final permit issuance with the 
original signature and date is maintained by EPA. For administrative 
purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the 
Federal Register, the undersigned EPA Official re-signs the notice of 
final permit issuance for publication, as an official document of the 
Environmental Protection Agency. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this notice of final permit issuance upon 
publication in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Charles Maguire,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 6.

    This notice of final permit issuance of the Environmental 
Protection Agency was signed on January 15, 2021, by Jeffery Robichaud, 
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 7, pursuant to the settlement 
agreement entered in Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. et al. v. U.S. EPA, No. 
15-2091 (2d Cir.). That notice of final permit issuance with the 
original signature and date is maintained by EPA. For administrative 
purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the 
Federal Register, the undersigned EPA Official re-signs the notice of 
final permit issuance for publication, as an official document of the 
Environmental Protection Agency. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this notice of final permit issuance upon 
publication in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Jeffery Robichaud,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 7.

    This notice of final permit issuance of the Environmental 
Protection Agency was signed on January 15, 2021, by Darcy O'Connor, 
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 8, pursuant to the settlement 
agreement entered in Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. et al. v. U.S. EPA, No. 
15-2091 (2d Cir.). That notice of final permit issuance with the 
original signature and date is maintained by EPA. For administrative 
purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the 
Federal Register, the undersigned EPA Official re-signs the notice of 
final permit issuance for publication, as an official document of the 
Environmental Protection Agency. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this notice of final permit issuance upon 
publication in the Federal Register.


[[Page 10278]]


    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Humberto Garcia,
Acting Director, Water Division, EPA Region 8.

    This notice of final permit issuance of the Environmental 
Protection Agency was signed on January 15, 2021, by Tom[aacute]s 
Torres, Director, Water Division, EPA Region 9, pursuant to the 
settlement agreement entered in Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. et al. v. 
U.S. EPA, No. 15-2091 (2d Cir.). That notice of final permit issuance 
with the original signature and date is maintained by EPA. For 
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of 
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned EPA Official re-
signs the notice of final permit issuance for publication, as an 
official document of the Environmental Protection Agency. This 
administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this notice 
of final permit issuance upon publication in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Tom[aacute]s Torres,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 9.

    This notice of final permit issuance of the Environmental 
Protection Agency was signed on January 15, 2021, by Daniel Opalski, 
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 10, pursuant to the settlement 
agreement entered in Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. et al. v. U.S. EPA, No. 
15-2091 (2d Cir.). That notice of final permit issuance with the 
original signature and date is maintained by EPA. For administrative 
purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the 
Federal Register, the undersigned EPA Official re-signs the notice of 
final permit issuance for publication, as an official document of the 
Environmental Protection Agency. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this notice of final permit issuance upon 
publication in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Daniel Opalski,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2021-03391 Filed 2-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>