alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
      The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1


<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                                    0
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                19,500
<BONDS>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                             52,336
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                          (19,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              0
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                              0
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 15-B

Chrysler Financial Corporation
27777 Franklin Road
Southfield, Michigan






We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim
financial information of Chrysler Financial Corporation (a subsidiary of
Chrysler Corporation) and consolidated subsidiaries for the periods ended
September 30, 1996 and 1995, as indicated in our report dated October 9, 1996;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information. 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your 
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended September 30,
1996, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-55787, 
33-55789, and 33-64179 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche

October 15, 1996
#### 808.001-70 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Veterans Affairs (VA) Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) or “VA FSS”* means FSS contracts awarded by the VA National Acquisition Center, under authority delegated by the General Services Administration (GSA) per FAR 8.402(a). VA FSS contracts include medical, dental, pharmacy and veterinary equipment and supplies in Federal Supply Classification (FSC) Group 65, instruments and laboratory equipment in FSC Group 66 and health care services in FSC Group 621.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Healthy Youth - Childhood Obesity      

# Healthy Youth - Childhood Obesity

The prevalence of overweight among children aged 6 to 11 more than doubled in the past 20 years, going from 7% in 1980 to 18.8% in 2004. The rate among adolescents aged 12 to 19 more than tripled, increasing from 5% to 17.1%. This fact sheet provides information about the problem of overweight in children.

http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/overweight/index.htm
#### 6.002 Limitations.

No agency shall contract for supplies or services from another agency for the purpose of avoiding the requirements of this part.
#### 728.307-70 Medical Evacuation (MEDEVAC) Services (MAR 1993).

The contracting officer must insert the clause at 752.228-70 in all contracts which require performance by contractor employees overseas.

[59 FR 33446, June 29, 1994, as amended at 79 FR 74995, Dec. 16, 2014]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

DANIEL HOWARD WEISS, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Res • onden . 

DANIEL HOWARD WEISS, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

DANIEL HOWARD WEISS, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

DANIEL HOWARD WEISS, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Res ondent. 

DANIEL HOWARD WEISS, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Res • ondent 

DANIEL HOWARD WEISS, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Res • ondent. 

No. 69863 FILED 

APR 1 9 2016 

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME 001 RT 

SY,..aj_Ste47,_ 

No. 69864 DEPUTY CLER 

No. 69865 

No. 69866 

No. 69867 

No. 69868 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS 

These are appeals from judgments of conviction. Second 

Judicial District Court, Washoe County; David A. Hardy, Judge. 

Appellant's counsel has filed a notice of voluntary withdrawal 

of these appeals. Counsel advises this court that he has informed 

(0) 1947A 
appellant of the legal effects and consequences of voluntarily withdrawing 

these appeals, including that appellant cannot hereafter seek to reinstate 

these appeals, and that any issues that were or could have been brought in 

these appeals are forever waived. Having been so informed, appellant 

consents to a voluntary dismissal of these appeals. Cause appearing, we 

ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.' 

J. 

Hardesty 

Saitta 

jek.0.4. J. 

Pickering 

cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge 

Washoe County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

'Because no remittitur will issue in these matters, see NRAP 42(b), 

the one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition 

under NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 2
332.7002 Policy. ( a ) Contracts shall require the electronic submission of payment requests, except for— ( 1 ) Purchases paid for with a Government-wide commercial purchase card; and
( 2 ) Classified contracts or purchases when electronic submission and processing of payment requests could compromise classified information or national security.
( b ) Where a contract otherwise requires the electronic submission of invoices, the Contracting Officer may authorize alternate procedures only if the Contracting Officer makes a written determination that: ( 1 ) The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is unable to receive electronic payment requests or provide acceptance electronically;
( 2 ) The contractor has demonstrated that electronic submission would be unduly burdensome; or
( 3 ) The contractor is in the process of transitioning to electronic submission of payment requests, but needs additional time to complete such transition. Authorizations granted on the basis of this paragraph (b)(3) must specify a date by which the contractor will transition to electronic submission.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, HHS officials shall process electronic payment submissions through the Department of the Treasury Invoice Processing Platform or successor system.
( d ) If the requirement for electronic submission of payment requests is waived under paragraph (a)(2) or (b) of this section, the contract or alternate payment authorization, as applicable, shall specify the form and method of payment request submission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,625,005
<SECURITIES>                                   829,886
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,506,995
<ALLOWANCES>                                   155,579
<INVENTORY>                                  6,942,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,705,710
<PP&E>                                      33,397,005
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,140,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,962,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,358,799
<BONDS>                                      3,882,760
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,138,096
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,214,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,962,415
<SALES>                                     34,958,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,147,394
<CGS>                                       25,694,467
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,694,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,175,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             274,661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,163,731
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,073,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,090,731
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,090,731
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.01


</TABLE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Financial Literacy of 15-Year-Olds: Results from Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015      

# Report: Financial Literacy of 15-Year-Olds: Results from Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015

This report presents the results for U.S. 15-year-olds on the PISA financial literacy assessment, as well as how they compared to their peers in the other participating education systems and how the findings compare to the 2012 assessment. **Learn more.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>
================================================================================
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
company's financial  statements as of and for the nine months ended December 31,
1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
================================================================================
 
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              Apr-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                Dec-31-1996
 
<CASH>                              1,315,944
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                      33,880,399
<ALLOWANCES>                          810,213
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0
<PP&E>                                574,628
<DEPRECIATION>                        357,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     34,764,365
 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                           20,623,866
 
<OTHER-SE>                            131,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       34,764,365
 
<SALES>                             2,922,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    2,922,600
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       98,685
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       90,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    704,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     1,646,914
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                        1,646,914
 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .24


</TABLE>
#### William Roussin, Appellant, v. Ralph Kirkbride, Appellee.

*367opinion filed October 28, 1940;

rehearing denied February 20, 1941.

Mason & Flynn and Philip G. Listeman, for appellant; Whitnel, Browning, Listeman & Walker, of counsel; Warnock, Williamson & Burroughs and Gillespie, Burke & Gillespie, for appellee; M. L. Burroughs, William G. "Horsley and Louis F. Gillespie, of counsel.

Opinion by

Justice Culbertson.

“Not to be published in. full.”
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 10321 

To amend the definition of ‘‘production facility’’ in the Atomic Energy Act 

of 1954 to exclude an equipment or device capable of reprocessing spent 

nuclear fuel in a manner that does not separate plutonium from other 

transuranic elements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2024 

Mr. LATTA (for himself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the definition of ‘‘production facility’’ in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 to exclude an equipment or device 

capable of reprocessing spent nuclear fuel in a manner 

that does not separate plutonium from other transuranic 

elements, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear REFUEL 

5 (Recycling Efficient Fuels Utilizing Expedited Licensing) 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 10321 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM DEFINITION OF PRODUCTION FA2 CILITY. 

3 Section 11 v. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 

4 U.S.C. 2014(v)) is amended by striking ‘‘separating the 

5 isotopes of uranium or enriching uranium in the isotope 

6 235’’ and inserting ‘‘(A) separating isotopes of uranium 

7 or enriching uranium in the isotope 235; or (B) reprocess8 ing spent nuclear fuel in a manner that does not separate 

9 plutonium from other transuranic elements’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### 110 Sand Co., Plaintiff, v Nassau Land Improvement Co., Inc., Appellant, and Town of Babylon, Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[775 NYS2d 578]

*498In an action to recover damages pursuant to a public improvement contract, the defendant Nassau Land Improvement Co., Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), dated March 11, 2003, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Town of Babylon which was for summary judgment dismissing its second cross claim alleging breach of contract.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Town of Babylon which was for summary judgment dismissing the appellant’s second cross claim alleging breach of contract (see *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Once the Town established its prima facie entitlement to judgment by demonstrating that the appellant agreed both orally and in writing to waive all claims against the Town for additional compensation in exchange for an extension of time to complete the improvement project, it became incumbent upon the appellant to establish, by admissible evidence, that a triable issue of fact existed. “[A] shadowy semblance of an issue or bald conclusory assertions, even if believable, are not enough to defeat a motion for summary judgment” *(Mlcoch v Smith,*173 AD2d 443, 444 [1991] [internal quotation marks omitted]). In response, the appellant failed to come forth with proof in evidentiary form tending to establish that its waiver was the result of economic duress *(see 805 Third Ave. Co. v M.W. Realty Assoc.,*58 NY2d 447 [1983]; *Muller Constr. Co. v New York Tel. Co.,*40 NY2d 955, 956 [1976]; *Austin Instrument v Loral Corp.,*29 NY2d 124, 130 [1971]; *Matter of Hopkins v Governale,*222 AD2d 435, 436 [1995]; *Home & City Sav. Bank v Jamel Realty Corp.,*186 AD2d 936 [1992]; *Midwood Dev. Corp. v K 12th Assoc.,*146 AD2d 754 [1989]). Further, the appellant waived any claim of economic duress by its failure to promptly repudiate its waiver (see *Sheindlin v Sheindlin,*88 AD2d 930, 931 [1982]; *Leader v Dinkler Mgt. Corp.,*26 AD2d 683 [1966], *affd*20 NY2d 393 [1967]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.
#### 653.219-70 DOS form DS-1910, Small Business Agency Review—Actions Above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold.

As prescribed in 619.501(c), DS-1910 is prescribed for use in documenting set-aside decisions.

[64 FR 43634, Aug. 11, 1999]
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41069 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JHONY BARRIOS

- ANDRADE , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:15

- CR

- 314

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Jhony Barrios

- Andrade (Barrios)
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (19 67), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Barrios has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Barrios ’s claim of ine ffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim wit hout

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 26, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41069 Document: 00513397940 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/26/2016No. 15

- 41069

2 prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Barrios ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DIS MISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Barrios ’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is
DENIED. Case: 15-41069 Document: 00513397940 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/26/2016
Rel: June 7, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

THE SUPREME COURT

OCTOBER TERM, 2023-2024

SC-2022-0928

Joseph Gurganus v. Jeffrey Gurganus, Donna Connell, and Trena Wise 

(Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court: CV-17-9).

BRYAN, Justice.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P.

Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur.