alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 10222 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                               H. R. 10222

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the 
application of the excise tax on tobacco to pipe and waterpipe tobacco.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 21, 2024

 Mr. Issa (for himself and Mr. Davis of North Carolina) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the 
application of the excise tax on tobacco to pipe and waterpipe tobacco.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hookah Clarification Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. WATERPIPE TOBACCO TAX.

    (a) In General.--Section 5701(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(f) Pipe and Waterpipe Tobacco.--
            ``(1) In general.--On pipe tobacco, manufactured in or 
        imported into the United States, there shall be imposed a tax 
        of $2.8311 per pound (and a proportionate tax at the like rate 
        on all fractional parts of a pound).
            ``(2) Waterpipe tobacco.--On waterpipe tobacco, 
        manufactured in or imported into the United States, there shall 
        be imposed a tax of $2.8311 per pound and (a proportionate tax 
        at the like rate on all fractional parts of a pound).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 5702 of such Code is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(q) Waterpipe Tobacco.--
            ``(1) In general.--The term `waterpipe tobacco' means a 
        tobacco product consumed or intended to be consumed in a 
        hookah, including hookah tobacco, shisha, maassel, narghile, 
        and argileh.
            ``(2) Hookah.--The term `hookah' means a waterpipe used to 
        consume shisha or other tobacco products with a long flexible 
        tube for drawing aerosol through water.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to tobacco manufactured or imported after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### 613.305-3 Conditions for use.

The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 13.305-3(a).
9.701 Definition. *Pool,* as used in this subpart, means a group of concerns (see 19.001) that have— ( 1 ) Associated together in order to obtain and perform, jointly or in conjunction with each other, defense production or research and development contracts;
( 2 ) Entered into an agreement governing their organization, relationship, and procedures; and
( 3 ) Obtained approval of the agreement by either— ( i ) The Small Business Administration (SBA) under section 9 or 11 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 638 or 640) (see 13 CFR part 125); or
( ii ) A designated official under Part V of Executive Order 10480, August 14, 1953 (18 FR 4939, August 20, 1953) and section 708 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. App. 2158).
[48 FR 42142, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 2649, Jan. 17, 1986; 66 FR 2128, Jan. 10, 2001]
#### 706.501 Requirement.

The USAID Administrator delegated the authority to designate the Agency Competition Advocate and a competition advocate for each agency procuring activity (see 702.170 of this chapter) to the M/OAA Director. The M/OAA Director, under the Administrator's delegation, has designated the M/OAA Deputy Director for Accountability, Compliance, Transparency, and Support as the Agency Competition Advocate and the deputy head of each contracting activity as the competition advocate for each activity. The competition advocate for USAID/W is the Deputy Director for M/OAA Operations. If there is no deputy, the head of the contracting activity is designated the competition advocate for that activity. The competition advocate's duties may not be redelegated, but can be exercised by persons serving as acting deputy (or acting head) of the contracting activity. For definitions of contracting activity and head of the contracting activity, see 702.170 of this chapter.

[79 FR 74992, Dec. 16, 2014]
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 22, 2015

No. 04-15-00599-CR

Delbert Anthony HARDIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 6, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 471386

Honorable Wayne A. Christian, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief, due November 30, 2015, has not been filed. On December 3, 2015, we 

notified appellant’s counsel of the deficiency. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). We received no 

response.

Therefore, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b)(2), we abate this case 

to the trial court and ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to answer the following 

questions:

(1) Does appellant desire to prosecute his appeal?

(2) Is appellant indigent? 

(a) If appellant is indigent, the trial court shall take such measures 

as may be necessary to assure the effective assistance of counsel, 

which may include the appointment of new counsel. 

(b) If the trial court finds that appellant is not indigent, the trial 

court should determine whether appellant has made the necessary 

arrangements for filing a brief.

(3) Has appointed counsel abandoned the appeal? Because initiating contempt 

proceedings against appellant’s counsel may be necessary, the trial court should 
address this issue even if new counsel is retained or substituted before the date of 

the hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (b)(4).

The trial court may, in its discretion, receive evidence on the first two questions by sworn 

affidavit from appellant. The trial court shall, however, order appellant’s counsel to be present at 

the hearing.

We ORDER the trial court to file its written findings of fact and conclusions of law with 

the trial court clerk no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order. We ORDER the 

trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record in this court no later than ten days after the 

trial court files its findings of facts and conclusions of law. We further ORDER the court reporter 

to file in this court a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing, along with copies of any 

documentary evidence admitted, no later than twenty days after the date of the hearing. 

All appellate deadlines are ABATED pending further orders from this court. 

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of December, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Native One Stop Website      

# Resource: Native One Stop Website

This website provides a one-stop shop for American Indians and Alaska Natives to access resources available from the federal government. Users can complete a prescreening questionnaire to determine their eligibility criteria for resources and programs and learn how to apply. Resource categories include youth, education, food, employment, loans, and environment. 

http://www.nativeonestop.gov/?utm_source=youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=reports-and-resources
### {In Archive} Re: ExxonMobil MCU Permit neil. j .ryan to: Shaheerah Kelly 04/27/2005 05:32 AM

From: neil. j .ryan@exxonmobil.com
To: Shaheerah Kelly/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Archive: This message is being viewed in an archive.

Shaheerah:

I understand that you were able to contact Justin Harrison. He is the correct contact. Thanks for tracking him down while I was out of the office.

Neil Ryan US Production OIMS - ER Supervisor 281-654-1042

Kelly.Shaheera h@epamail.epa.
gov To

neil.j.ryan@exxonmobil.com

cc

04/26/05 11:08 Subject AM ExxonMobil MCU Permit

Neil, please let me know if there is a new air permitting contact for the part 71 Title V permit to be issued to ExxonMobil. I called Jennifer Wilder's number and it appears she's at a different location. Thanks.

Shaheerah Kelly Air Division, Permits Office U S EPA Region IX 75 Hawthorne StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-947-4156 Fax: 415-947-3579
EXHIBIT 32CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002February 14, 2007In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Church Loans & Investments Trust, a Texas real estate investment trust, (the Trust), for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Trust certifies that, to the best of the officers knowledge:(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and;(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report/s/ Kelly ArcherKelly Archer
President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Robert E. FowlerRobert E. Fowler
Senior Vice-President and CFO
(Principal Financial Officer)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 2283** 

RONALD DALE MCLELLAND , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. CITY OF NORTH MYRTLE BEACH , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dis trict of South Carolina , at Florence
. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 4:08

- cv - 03430

- JMC )

Submitted : March 15 , 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirm ed by un published pe r curiam opinion
.
Ronald Dale McLelland , Appellant Pro Se. D.L. Dirk Aydlette, III, Christina M. Summer, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina , for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURI AM: Ronald Dale McLelland appeals the district court ’ s order rejecting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this age discrimination action . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible e rror. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McLelland v. City of N. Myrtle Beach , No. 4:08

- cv - 03430

- JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2010) ; see Gross v. FBL Fin. Servs., Inc. , 129 S. Ct. 2343, 2352 (2009) (holding that, in age discrim ination action, plaintiff “must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that age was the ‘but

- for’ cause of the challenged adverse employment action”)
. We deny McLelland’s motion to exclude Defendant’s informal brief on appeal. We dispense with oral a rgument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
933.104 Protests to GAO. ( a ) ( 2 ) The contracting officer shall provide the notice of protest.
( b ) *Protests before award.* ( 1 ) When the Department has received notice from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) of a protest filed directly with the GAO, a contract may not be awarded until the matter is resolved, unless authorized by the HCA in accordance with 48 CFR 33.104(b). Before the HCA authorizes the award, the required finding shall be concurred in by the DOE counsel handling the protest, endorsed by the Senior Program Official, and approved by the Senior Procurement Executive. The finding shall address the likelihood that the protest will be sustained by the GAO.
( c ) *Protests after award.* Before the HCA authorizes performance, the finding required by 48 CFR 33.104(c)(2) shall be concurred in by the DOE counsel handling the protest, endorsed by the Senior Program Official, and approved by the Senior Procurement Executive.
( g ) *Notice to GAO.* ( 1 ) The report to the GAO regarding a decision not to comply with the GAO's recommendation, discussed at 48 CFR 33.104(f), shall be provided by the HCA making the award, after approval of the Senior Procurement Executive. If a DOE-wide policy issue is involved, the report shall be provided by the Senior Procurement Executive.
( 2 ) It is the policy of the Department to comply promptly with recommendations set forth in Comptroller General Decisions except for compelling reasons.
( 3 ) The GAO does not have jurisdiction to consider subcontractor protests. 933.106 Solicitation provisions.
[61 FR 41708, Aug. 9, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 36367, 36378, July 22, 2009; 75 FR 29459, May 26, 2010]
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

46) ll-K- (B) -34 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

p.i 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:49 AM Sheet 46 of 325 
P.2 

/__A <=> frj] 9 

II-K-(B)-34 

STATUS OF THE ENERGY SCENARIO. 

Letter from E. Medine, EEA to R. Short, EPArSASD. 

April 22, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-34
#### 6101.10 Admissibility of evidence[Rule 10].

The Board may in its discretion receive any evidence to which no party objects. In ruling on evidentiary objections, the Board is guided but not bound by the Federal Rules of Evidence, except that the Board generally admits hearsay unless the Board finds it unreliable.
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ 

)

Essential Air Service at )

)

MUSCLE SHOALS, ALABAMA ) OST-2000-7856

)

Under 49 U.S.C. §41731 et seq. )

__________________________________________ 

GULFSTREAM INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES WITHDRAWAL OF OFFER TO 

PROVIDE ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE AT MUSCLE SHOALS, ALABAMA

Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressed to:

Mickey Bowman

Vice President of Essential Air Service

Gulfstream International Airlines

3201 Griffin Road, 4th Floor

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312

Telephone: 270-689-2180

Fax: 270-689-2180

E-Mail: mbowman@gulfstreamair.com

Gulfstream International Airlines (“Gulfstream”) hereby notifies the Department of Transportation of the 

withdrawal of its offer to provide subsidized air service to the community of Muscle Shoals, Alabama 

As the Department is aware, Gulfstream was awarded the Muscle Shoals route by Order 2000-7856 dated 

March 11, 2011 at a negotiated subsidy rate of $2,553,283 per year. We have been diligently working 

toward a service start date in early July. Basic to that plan was a codeshare relationship we were forging 

with Delta Air Lines. The process of these negotiations has been ongoing for some time. The focus was to 

structure a relationship what would provide the community of Muscle Shoals with levels of pricing, 

connectivity and schedule coordination would foster traffic growth and provide a “seamless” product by 

which all could benefit. 

Earlier this month Gulfstream was advised that Delta was immediately terminating codeshare discussions 

as it had made a policy decision to no longer pursue codeshare relationships with operators of turboprop 

aircraft. Gulfstream has committed substantial time and resources in preparation for service to Muscle 

Shoals as well as other markets in the region that it hoped to serve. The company does not believe that 

adequate levels of service can be provided to these communities without a major airline codeshare and the 

end product would not be acceptable to the communities without such a relationship in place.

We would remind the DOT that the original bid that Gulfstream tendered requested a subsidy rate of some

$2,954.313. That amount was subsequently negotiated down to the $2,553,283 level. The primary reason 

Gulfstream felt comfortable in agreeing to a $400,000 decrease in required subsidy centered on the Delta 

codeshare. Coincidently, roughly two weeks after agreeing to this 14% reduction in subsidy compensation, 

Delta announced that they would reduce operations at the Memphis hub by some 25%. It is the combined 

effects of this service reduction at our contemplated hub, the agreement to a reduced subsidy amount and, 

most importantly, our inability to secure a codeshare relationship that would provide the citizens of Muscle 

Shoals with a product they would continue to use, that drives our decision. 
We regret to inform the Department that we will be unable to provide the service we had hoped. Should 

you have any further questions relating to these bids please don’t hesitate to contact me directly.
February 23, 2012

NOTE TO: Docket EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2010‐0885

SUBJECT: February 21, 2012 Briefing on the Ozone Classifications Rule   

Attached is the briefing material that was use on February 21, 2012, with the NACAA conference call.

Attendees:

NACAA members, as well as representatives from NESCAUM, MARAMA, OTC, CENSARA, and WESTAR.

Attachment
47.305-11 Options in shipment and delivery. Although the clauses prescribed in subpart 43.2 allow certain changes to be made in regard to shipment and delivery, it may be desirable to provide specifically for certain options in the solicitation. The Government may reserve the right to— ( a ) Direct deliveries of all or part of the contract quantity to destinations or to consignees other than those specified in the solicitation and in the contract;
( b ) Direct shipments in quantities that may require transportation rates different from those on which the contract price is based; and
( c ) Direct shipments by a mode of transportation other than that stipulated in the solicitation and in the contract.
[48 FR 42424, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 62 FR 237, Jan. 2, 1997]
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Ramon Chimelis, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big Sky Industries VI, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(C)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 6, 2009

/s/ Ramon Chimelis

Ramon Chimelis

Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 15








November 13, 1998









FirstEnergy Corp.
76 South Main Street
Akron, OH  44308

Gentlemen:

We are aware that FirstEnergy Corp. has incorporated by reference 
in its Registration Statements No. 333-48587, No. 333-48651, No. 
333-58279 and No. 333-65409 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 
September 30, 1998, which includes our report dated November 13, 
1998 covering the unaudited interim financial information 
contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act 
of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration 
statements prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared 
or certified by our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 
of the Act.

                                   Very truly yours,




                                   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP