alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           PPRER015019      

# PPRER015019

Shafii, T., Benson, S. K., Morrison, D. M., Hughes, J. P., Golden, M. R.,  Holmes, K. K. (2015). A pilot randomised controlled trial of an interactive computer-based intervention for sexual health in adolescents and young adults. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 91, A33-A33. 

N/ADid not meet the review eligibility criteria
#### In re COHEN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, 1906.)

In the matter of Nathaniel Cohen.

No opinion. Ordered that respondent file answer in 20 days.
Verizon Maryland Inc.



EXHIBIT 12





COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|(Dollars in Millions)                                                                            |  | Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|                                                                                                
|Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |  | $                             
|Dividends received from equity affiliate                                                         |  |                               
|Interest expense                                                                                 |  |                               
|Portion of rent expense representing interest                                                    |  |                               
|Amortization of capitalized interest                                                             |  |                               
|                                                                                                 |  |                               
|Earnings, as adjusted                                                                            |  | $                             
|                                                                                                 |  |                               
|                                                                                                 | 
|Fixed charges:                                                                                   |  |                               
|Interest expense                                                                                 |  | $                             
|Portion of rent expense representing interest                                                    |  |                               
|Capitalized interest                                                                             |  |                               
|                                                                                                 |  |                               
|Fixed charges                                                                                    |  | $                             
|                                                                                                 |  |                               
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                                               |  |                               
|                                                                                                 |  |
#### McPHILLIPS, Respondent, v. MANHATTAN RY. CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by Matthew McPhillips against the Manhattan Railway Company and another. J. O. Nicholls, for appellants. W. G. Peckham, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment modified by reducing th'e amount awarded for fee damage to $2,000, and by reducing the amount awarded for rental damage to $200 per annum, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Settle ordér on notice.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Administration for Children and Families/Family and Youth Services Bureau Runaway and Homeless Youth Programs      

# Administration for Children and Families/Family and Youth Services Bureau Runaway and Homeless Youth Programs

Eligibility: Youth aged 16 to 22 who are unable to return to their homes	Focus: Life skills training

Runaway and Homeless Youth Programs that serve transition-age youth include the Transitional Living Program and the Maternity Group Homes Program.

The Transitional Living Program for Older Homeless Youth promotes the independence of youth between 16 and 22 years old who are unable to return to their homes. Grantees provide housing and a range of services, including life skills training, financial literacy instruction, and education and employment services. Youth might live in group homes or in their own apartments, depending on the program and each young person's independent living skills.

The Maternity Group Homes Program, part of the Transitional Living Program, supports homeless pregnant and/or parenting young people between the ages of 16 and 22, as well as their dependent children. Services are provided for up to 21 months.

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/fysb/programs/runaway-homeless-youth
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 33 (Monday, February 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 10613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03530]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #16815 and #16816; Pennsylvania Disaster Number 
PA-00108]


Administrative Declaration Amendment of a Disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania dated 12/18/2020.
    Incident: Tropical Storm Isaias.
    Incident Period: 08/04/2020.

DATES: Issued on 02/17/2021.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/18/2021.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/20/2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, 
(202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of an Administrative declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, dated 12/18/2020 is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 03/18/2021.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Tami Perriello,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-03530 Filed 2-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Effects and Consequences of Underage Drinking On Adolescent Brain Development      

# Effects and Consequences of Underage Drinking On Adolescent Brain Development

This bulletin outlines some of the consequences of underage drinking including the effect that drinking can have on adolescent brain development. As outlined in the bulletin, studies show that continued use of alcohol and other drugs may hinder youth’s advancement to more complex stages of thinking and social interaction.

http://www.toosmarttostart.samhsa.gov/families/facts/brain.aspx
#### RICHARDSON & BOYNTON CO., Respondent, v. SCHIFF, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

March 16, 1906.)

Action by the Richardson & Boynton Company against Fanny H. Sehiff.

No opinion-. Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers affirmed, with costs.
#### 52.242-13 Bankruptcy.

As prescribed in 42.903, insert the following clause:

# Bankruptcy (JUL 1995)

In the event the Contractor enters into proceedings relating to bankruptcy, whether voluntary or involuntary, the Contractor agrees to furnish, by certified mail or electronic commerce method authorized by the contract, written notification of the bankruptcy to the Contracting Officer responsible for administering the contract. This notification shall be furnished within five days of the initiation of the proceedings relating to bankruptcy filing. This notification shall include the date on which the bankruptcy petition was filed, the identity of the court in which the bankruptcy petition was filed, and a listing of Government contract numbers and contracting offices for all Government contracts against which final payment has not been made. This obligation remains in effect until final payment under this contract.

(End of clause)

[56 FR 15156, Apr. 15, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 34741, July 3, 1995]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                              4,409,402
<SECURITIES>                        1,296,625
<RECEIVABLES>                       5,683,258
<ALLOWANCES>                        119,749
<INVENTORY>                         6,144,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    18,739,789
<PP&E>                              27,925,658
<DEPRECIATION>                      14,636,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      32,028,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               5,999,834
<BONDS>                             5,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            1,170,896
<OTHER-SE>                          18,244,019
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        32,028,744
<SALES>                             33,310,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    33,585,799
<CGS>                               23,530,138
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       23,530,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    5,770,769
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    22,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  410,520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     3,968,902
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,462,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 2,506,902
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        2,506,902
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       2.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                       2.14
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed March 12, 2020 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00013-CR 

SEBASTIAN CARLOS ROMAN, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court 

Grayson County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 071029 - Count 3 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Reichek 

Opinion by Justice Osborne 

Sebastian Carlos Roman filed his notice of appeal on January 2, 2020. The 

clerk’s record shows that although appellant was indicted on three counts, the jury 

did not find him guilty of count 3, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. In fact, 

the judgment states “Judgment not reached.” 

Appeals in criminal cases are permitted only when they are specifically 

authorized by statute. State ex rel. Lykos v. Fine, 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 2011); Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696–97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). 

Generally, a criminal defendant may only appeal from a final judgment. See State v. 
 –2– 

Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n.4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). A “final judgment” is a 

“final judgment of conviction,” which is defined in the code of criminal procedure 

as “the written declaration of the court signed by the trial judge and entered of record 

showing the conviction or acquittal of the defendant.” Raley v. State, 441 S.W.3d 

647, 650 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, pet ref’d); TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ANN. art. 42.01, § 1. Here, appellant was not convicted of count 3, and there is no 

judgment. Under these circumstances, we conclude we have no jurisdiction. 

We dismiss the appeal. 

. 

Do Not Publish 

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) 

200013F.U05 

 

/Leslie Osborne/ 

LESLIE OSBORNE 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

SEBASTIAN CARLOS ROMAN, 

Appellant 

No. 05-20-00013-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 397th Judicial 

District Court, Grayson County, 

Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 071029 Ct 3. 

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Osborne, Justices Schenck and 

Reichek participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal. 

Judgment entered March 12, 2020
Bryan W. Shaw, Ph.D., Chairman

Buddy Garcia, Commissioner

Carlos Rubinstein, Commissioner

Mark R Vickery, P.G., Executive Director

RECEIVED

II HAR 29 PH I: 52

tH£RHAL AffAIRS OIVISI8N

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL \.lUALITY

Protecting Texas by Reducing and Preventing Pollution

March 25, 2011

Docket No. 2009-t898-R1JL

91 7108 2133 3935 2304 8165

Alfredo Armendariz, Ph.D.

Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region 6

1445 Ross Avenue

Dallas, Texas 75202-2733

Dear Dr. Armendariz:

EJIl1\.~~;)•..••••fllttl•••••••••••••••••

EJDIl1\.Yi.%l...EJWQ. ...•...•.••.....

6MD 6SF.......•..........

fl()IC.J••••••..•.•• EJFl~ ••••.•••••••••••••

6PD.O.(..~~;f.~.\ flXA••f'~~..j .

On September 15, 2010, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (Commission)

adopted revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) relating to the rules for the Qualified

Facilities program and the definition of Best Available Control Technology.

The Commission adopted amendments to §§ 116.10, 116.111, 116.116, and 116.117 and a new §

116.17 of 30 TAC Chapter 116, Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or

Modification and corresponding revisions to the SIP. The adopted amendments address

deficiencies as identified by EPA in the rules related to the qualified facility program as

published in the April 14, 2010 notice of disapproval ofthe program as a SIP amendment (75

Federal Register 19468).

By letter dated October 5,2010. the TCEQ submitted these proposed revisions to the SIP. a

public hearing certification, a complete record ofthe public hearings, and the accompanying

order and supplement for the SIP revision.

Enclosed, on a CD. are the submittals for the rulemakings that adopted or amended rules

regarding the qualified facilities program, and the definition of best available control technology

in § 116.10, by the Commission on the following dates: February 14. 1996; June 18, 1998;

August 9, 2000; and August 21. 2002. Although EPA's records contain these previous

submittals, EPA has requested and the Commission is supplying, as part ofthis transmittal.

these previously submitted rulemakings to ensure that EPA reviews the new submittal together

with these previous submittals.

I also bring to your attention that the commission repealed §116.118 in a separate rulemaking on

February 23, 2011. whic!l became effective March 17. 2011. This repeal will not be submitted as

P.O. Box 13087 Austin, Texas 78711-3087 512-239-1000 Internet address: www.tceq.state.tx.us
a SIP revision, as the repealed rule had previously been disapproved by EPA (75 Federal

Register 19468) and is therefore no longer before EPA as a revision to the SIP.

I look forward to your expeditious approval ofthese SIP revisions.

Sincerely,

BWS/jbh

Enclosures
#### 6101.22 Transcripts [Rule 22].

The Board arranges transcription of hearings, other than hearings under the small claims procedure of Rule 52 (48 CFR 6101.52). The Board may, but generally does not, arrange transcription of conferences or other proceedings. No one may record or transcribe a Board proceeding without the Board's permission. The Board may order or acknowledge corrections to an official transcript. Each party is responsible for obtaining its own copy of a transcript.
Order entered November 1 6 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00567
- CV DARLENE C. AMRHEIN, Appellant

V. ATTORNEY LENNIE F. B OLLINGER, AND WORMIN TON & BOLLING ER LAW FIRM, Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006
- 02654
- 2017



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s November 6, 2018 “notice of court record received after filed brief to be included for ‘g ood cause’ reasons

. ” A ppellant seeks to have included “as relevant to Appeal” a copy of the trial court’s September 28, 2018 “order sustaining court reporter’s contest to plaintiff Darlene C. Amrhein’s ‘statement of inability to afford payment of

court co sts or an appeal bond’ filed with County Court at Law No. 6

. ” Appellant asserts she received the order October 30, 2018. We construe appellant’s notice as a request that a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the September 28 th order be filed. We GRANT the request and ORDER Collin County Clerk Stacey Kemp to file, no later than November 30, 2018, a supplemental clerk’srecord containing a copy of the order. On our own motion, we EXTEND the deadline for filing

appellant’s amended brief to Dece mber 10, 2018.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Kemp and the parties.
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
#### Chicago Dressed Beef Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Gold Medal Packing Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order insofar as it grants the motion to strike the denials in the answer unanimously reversed and the motion in that respect denied and otherwise order affirmed, with costs to plaintiff-respondent. Memorandum: The motion was made under CPLR 3211 (subd.,b). That section provides that a party may move for judgment dismissing one or more defenses on the ground that a defense is not stated. Actually the case was presented to the court as a motion to strike on the ground of sham, and Special Term so treated it. This was error, because there is no longer a motion to stirke as sham under the CPLR. (First Preliminary Report of the Advisory Committee on Practice and Procedure, p. 76; 3 Weinstein-KornMiller, N. Y. Civ. Pnae., par. 3024.10.) The claims of sham were asserted against the denials in the answer as distinguished from the affirmative defense. As to the portion of the motion directed to the affirmative defense, that was proper under CPLR 3211 (subd. b), but inasmuch as the affirmative defense sets up no facts that are sufficient in law as against this plaintiff, the motion in that respect should have been granted. (Appeal from an order of Oneida Special Term granting plaintiff’s motion to strike out the denial of defendant’s answer and dismiss the affirmative defense.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.
#### 653.200 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes or references optional and DOS forms for use in acquisition. Consistent with FAR 53.200, this subpart is arranged by subject matter, in the same order as and keyed to the parts of the DOSAR in which the form usage requirements are addressed.