alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.10
 
 
 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION
 OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CILCORP INC.
 (required
by Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002)
 
 
 In
connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2005 of CILCORP Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Warner L. Baxter,
chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
May 10, 2005
 ****By:
    /s/ Warner L.
  BaxterWarner
      L. BaxterExecutive Vice President
      andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
  Officer)
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           PPRER000392      

# PPRER000392

Ebreo, A., Feist-Price, S., Siewe, Y.,  Zimmerman, R. S. (2002). Effects of peer education on the peer educators in a school-based HIV prevention program: Where should peer education research go from here? Health Education  Behavior, 29(4), 411-423.

LowQuasi-experimental study that received a low rating because it did not establish baseline equivalence for the final analysis sample
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 15.01

August 13, 2002

Premcor Inc.
1700 East Putnam Avenue
Suite #500
Old Greenwich, CT 06870

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Premcor Inc. and subsidiaries for the three-month and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, as indicated in our report dated August 5,
2002 (which report includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's
change in accounting method related to stock-based compensation issued to
employees). Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, is
incorporated by reference into Registration Statement No. 333-87210 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Yours truly,



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) •'^-^-^f'jQphPT&TiO: 

From: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:50 PM 

To: 'gkahlstorf@gmail.com' 201! MAR I b P 2= I 1 

Cc: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: Response to Pacific Wings request for extension 

Attachments: OWB IVIKL response.pdf 

Greg, 

We have reviewed your request for an extension for proposals for EAS at Owensboro, KY, and Jackson, TN. We 

contacted both communities about the request. They responded and asked that the deadline not be extended. They 

told us that several airlines are interested in submitting proposals for EAS at their communities and they are concerned 

that they may lose interest if the deadline is extended. 

While we do occasionally grant extension requests, we generally do so only if the communities support it, as this 

program exists for the benefit of the communities. The original deadline of March 16 for proposals at Owensboro and 

Jackson will remain in place. 

Regards, 

Kevin 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

202-366-3176 phone 

202-366-7638 fax
#### In the Matter of James J. Healy, an Attorney.

Motion for an order modifying order of disbarment denied. Concur — Botein, P J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community      

# The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community

This report presents case management protocols for juvenile sex offenders in the community developed for the Virginia Department of Juvenile Justice.

http://www.csom.org/pubs/JuvProtocols.pdf
#### 642.602 Assignment and location.

The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 42.602(a).
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128305 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128305 

 COA: 256903 

Genesee CC: 03-011395-FC 

MICHAEL RENELL WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 17, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan, lv gtd 472 Mich 

881 (2005). 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DATAVIOUS MANUEL
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 13

- 4461

[ January 7, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert R. Makemson , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562012CF

003620A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nan Ellen Foley, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney Ge neral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

C ONFESSION OF E RROR

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s restitution order. Based on the State’s confession of error, we agree that the trial court should not have

issued the order without first conducting a hearing to determine the

amount of restitution. Hamrick v. State , 648 So. 2d 274, 276 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Thomas v. State , 517 So. 2d 132, 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct a hearing and issue a new restitution order.

Reversed and Remanded.

C IKLIN
, L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Ottawa Banking & Trust Company of Ottawa, Illinois, appellee, v. Anna N. Kendall, appellant.

Gen. No. 7,565.

Action upon promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Bureau county; the Hon. Edgar Eldredge, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 24, 1926.

Samuel B. Hill, James J. Conway and Josef Skinner, for appellant.

C. A. Trimble and C. B. Chapman, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Jett

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Nathan Kassal, appellee, v. Hovland-Sardeson-McColm Company, appellant.

Gen No. 30,513.

Action for breach of contract of employment. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Robert E. Gentzel, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court *621for the first district at the October term, 1925.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed June 14, 1926.

D’Ancona & Pflaum and Hugh O’Neil, for appellant. Kirkland, Patterson & Fleming, for appellee; Charles F. Rathbun, Joseph H. Pleck and William H. Symmes, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
828.7000 Scope of subpart. ( a ) As used in this subpart, the term “contractor” includes subcontractors of any tier under a contract containing an indemnification provision under 38 U.S.C. 7317.
( b ) This subpart sets forth the policies and procedures concerning indemnification of contractors performing contracts involving medical research or research and development that involve risks of an unusually hazardous nature, as authorized by 38 U.S.C. 7317.
( c ) The authority to indemnify the contractor under this subpart does not create any rights to third parties that do not exist by law.
#### 819.203 Relationship among small business programs.
[ARTICLE] 5
[LEGEND]
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's September 30, 1998 consolidated financial statements and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
[/LEGEND]
[MULTIPLIER] 1,000
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   9-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1998
[PERIOD-END]                               SEP-30-1998
[CASH]                                           2,857
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                   20,403
[ALLOWANCES]                                   (3,423)
[INVENTORY]                                     19,080
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                47,331
[PP&E]                                          19,967
[DEPRECIATION]                                 (7,088)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                  83,075
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           15,165
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                           321
[OTHER-SE]                                      50,457
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                    83,075
[SALES]                                         64,683
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                64,683
[CGS]                                         (33,831)
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                 (33,831)
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                              (35,547)
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                             (1,405)
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                (4,906)
[INCOME-TAX]                                     1,429
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                            (3,477)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                   (3,477)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                    (.11)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.11)
</TABLE>
#### 627.201 Patent and copyright infringement liability.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-03-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                          18,827
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,746
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,007
<INVENTORY>                                     56,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,726
<PP&E>                                         175,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 267,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,297
<BONDS>                                         43,449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,956
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   267,019
<SALES>                                        372,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               372,382
<CGS>                                          263,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  263,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   568
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 41,405
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,315
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,945
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,945
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of East Meadow Union Free School District, Appellant, v East Meadow Teachers Association, Respondent.

[777 NYS2d 140]

In a proceeding, inter alia, to consolidate two pending arbitration proceedings, the petitioner appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated March 28, 2003, as denied that branch of the petition which was to consolidate the two pending arbitration proceedings.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, that branch of the petition which was to consolidate the two pending arbitra*622tion proceedings is granted, and the two pending arbitration proceedings are consolidated.

The petitioner, East Meadow Union Free School District (hereinafter the district), and the respondent, East Meadow Teachers Association (hereinafter the union), are engaged in a dispute over the district’s right, under certain conditions, to assign high school teachers to teach more than five class periods per day. The teachers potentially affected by the outcome of the dispute work in two geographically separate facilities.

The union treated its grievance relating to the number of class periods that may be assigned to the high school teachers employed by the district as if it consisted of two separate grievances, one relating to each of the district’s two high schools. In contrast, the district sought to consolidate these two parallel proceedings. The Supreme Court, while denying this relief, ordered the two disputes to be the subject of a hearing before a single arbitrator.

Under the circumstances of this case, consolidation was clearly warranted under the criteria set forth in *County of Sullivan v Edward L. Nezelek, Inc.*(42 NY2d 123 [1977]; *see Yaffe v Mintz & Fraade,*270 AD2d 43 [2000]; *cf. Matter of Continental Energy Assoc. v ASEA Brown Boveri,*192 AD2d 467 [1993]). Accordingly, that branch of the petition which was to consolidate the two pending arbitration proceedings should have been granted. Ritter, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Information Memorandum: TANF-ACF-IM-2013-01 (Use of TANF Funds to Serve Homeless Families and Families at Risk of Experiencing Homelessness)      

# Information Memorandum: TANF-ACF-IM-2013-01 (Use of TANF Funds to Serve Homeless Families and Families at Risk of Experiencing Homelessness)

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families

This memo discusses the use of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funds to address the needs of families at-risk of or experiencing homelessness.

Federal programs

Homeless: families

Policy makers

Service providers

Federal guidance

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/resource/tanf-acf-im-2013-01
#### 52.214-25 Step Two of Two-Step Sealed Bidding.

As prescribed in 14.201-6(t), insert the following provision:

# Step Two of Two-Step Sealed Bidding (APR 1985)

(a) This invitation for bids is issued to initiate step two of two-step sealed bidding under subpart 14.5 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation.

(b) The only bids that the Contracting Officer may consider for award of a contract are those received from bidders that have submitted acceptable technical proposals in step one of this acquisition under __ [*the Contracting Officer shall insert the identification of the step-one request for technical proposals*].

(c) Any bidder that has submitted multiple technical proposals in step one of this acquisition may submit a separate bid on each technical proposal that was determined to be acceptable to the Government.

(End of provision)

[48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1747, Jan. 11, 1985; 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985]
July 27 , 2015

Mr

. Justin Sands

2709 Cyrano Street

Henderson, NV 89044

Dear Mr

. Sands :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your
request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your May 30 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 2586 ), but

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further,

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how i t would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional infor mation, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any question s or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure