## DEPARTMEN TO F -.^E TOPERATION S ^ ' 1 AU G 2 5 P 2 : i \ U . S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , DC . I N TH E MATTE RO F EMPIR E AIRWAY S Responden t

^^ ^ loU<e r A FA A DOCKE T NO . GTIOCAOOOS " CPi O £ A OOO t (Civi l Penalt y Proceeding ) DMSN0.FAA-2&W-SWi-

—f^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^^ ' HONORABL E ISAA C D . BENKI N ADMINISTRATIV E LA W JUDG E RESPONDENT' S NUN C PR O TUN C APPLICATIO N FO RA N AWAR D O FATTORNE Y FEE S AN D OTHE REXPENSE S PURSUAN T T O TH E EQUA L ACCES S T O JUSTIC E AC T (EAJA ) COME S NOW , Empir e Airways , Responden t herein , b y an dthroug h undersigne d cqunscl , an dpursuan t

t o 5 U.S.C . §50 4 hereb y applie s fo r attorne y fee s an dothe r

expense s incurre df n th e Matte r

o f Empir e Airways , FA A Docke t No . C? l OEA000 2 (Civi l Penalty). ' Th e followin g point s ar e mad e i n suppor t o f thi s application ;

' Althoug h th e Honorabl e Isaa c D , Bcnkin , Adminislrativ e La w Judge , serve da n Orde r Dismissin g Proceedin g an dCancelin g Hearin g o n Jun e 23,2010 , Respondent' s counse l o f recor dneve r

receive dacop y o f

th e Orde r unti l Jul y 26,2010 . Th e lac k o f servic e o f th e Orde r wa s cause db y aclerica l error . Specifically , Respondent' s counsel , Gregoi y S . V/inton , file daNotic e o f

Appearanc e an dSubstitutio n o f Counse l o n Jun e 1 , 2010 , an da Notic e o f Appearanc e o n Jul y 6,2010 . However , b y n o faul t o f Responden t

o r it s counsel , I

8LO/L00i a SW O < • VV d StLS8GtZ0 2 XV d 38:2 1 0L02/SS/8 0Th e officia l recor ddisclose s tha t o n Jun e 23,2010 , th e Honorabl e Isaa c D . Benkin , Administrativ e La w Judge , issue da n Orde r Dismissin g Proceedin g an dCancelin g Hearing , thereb y dismissin g al l o f th e charge s agains t

Applicant , wit h prejudice . A s such . Applican t i s th e prevailin g party . A s mor e full y discusse dbelow , th e Administraio r wa s no t substantiall y justifie di n commencin g th e complain t an dther e ar e n o specia l circumstance s whic h woul dmak e a n awar dunjust . A s aresult . Empir e Airway s Incurre dattorne y fee s an dexpense s i n exces s o f $4,980.00 . Therefor e th e Responden t mus t b e awarde dth e cos t

o f attorne y fee s an dexpenses . LEGA L AUTHORIT Y Unde r th e Equa l Acces s t o Justic e Ac t (EAJA) , aprevailin g part y ma y recove r reasonabl e litigatio n cost s i f th e agency' s position s i n th e underlyin g litigatio n wa s no t "substantiall y justified. " 5 U.S.C . §504(a)(l) . Th e Ac t provide s fo r

th e awar dfo r

aitome y fee s an dothe r

expense s t o eligibl e individual s an dentitie s wh o ar e partie s t o certai n adminisuativ e proceeding s befor e agencie s suc h a s th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA) .

counsel , Mr . Winton' s nam e wa s neve r adde dt o th e la w judge' s servic e list . Accordingly , thi s applicatio n i s timel y mad e a s i f th e la w judge' s Orde r

wa s serve dupo n Mr . Winto n o n Jul y 26,2010 , whe n h e firs t receive dacop y vi afacsimil e an demail . 2

810/200 0 SW Q * VV d 31?LSSei720 2 XV d 2S:S L 0L0S/S2/8 0The purpos e o f Equa l Acces s t o Justic e Ac t

i s to eliminate financial disincentiv e t o challeng e unreasonabl e goverrmien t actions , no t

t o conserv e financia

l resources . Richar dv Hinso n (1995 . CA3 ) 7 0 F3d415 , cert . den . (1996 ) 51 8 US 1004 , 13 5 LE d2 d1047 , 116 S C r 2322 . Legislativ e histor

y o f th e Equa l Acces s t o Justic e Ac t

i s cleai - that

Congres s intende di t t o b e remedy for

individual s an

dsmall businessmen wh o fac e tremendou s cost s o f litigatio n agains t

th e federa l government . Fidelit

y Consir . Co . (1982 , DO T BCA ) 82- 1 BCA P 15633 , o^ d(1983 , CA ) 700 F2 d1379 . 3 0 CC FP 70827 , cert . den . (1983 ) 46 4 U S 826 , 10 4 S O 97 , 7 8 LE d2 d10 3 and(supersede db y statute on other

ground s a s state din Maitlan dBros . Co . (1986 , ASBCA ) 86- 2 BCA P 18796 ) an d(supersede db y statute o n odie r ground s a s stale di n Grea t Wester n Utiliiy Corp . (1986 , EN G BCA ) 86- 3 BCA P 19011 ) and(supersede db

y statute on other

ground s a s state din Escobar v U.S . IN S (1991 , CA4 ) 93 5 F2 d650) . A n eligibl e part

y ma y receiv e a

n awar dwhen i t prevail s over

th e FAA , unles s th e agency' s positio n i n th e proceedin g wa s substantiall y justifie dor specia l circumstance s mak e a n awar dunjust . The EAJ

A require s decisio n maker s t o determin e whether th e government' s positio n wa s substantiall y justifie dbasedupo n th e administrativ e record , a s a whole . Th e FAA implement s th e EAJ A pursuant

t o 14C.F.R . § 14.04 . Furthermore unde r unde r th e agency' s rules , th e FA A attorney bear s th e burde

n o f provin g substantial justification . See I n th e Matte r o f Richar dW

. Kuhling , 200 5 FA

A Lexi s 700 , 115-1 7 (FA

A 3

SLO/eOO E SW Q * VV d St?LSS6tS0 S XV d eeiS L 0L02/S2/8 0(FA A 2005) . Th e Suprem

e Cour r ha s explaine dtha

t th e ter m"substantiall y justified, " a s use di n the EAJA , mean s "justifie dt o adegre e tha t coul dsatisf

y areasonabl e person, " o r havin g a "reasonabl e basi s bot

h i n law andfact. " Immigratio n an dNaturalizatio n Servic e v . Jean , 49 6 U.S . 154 , 15 8 n. 6 (1990) , citin g Pierc e v . Underwood , 48 7 U.S . 552 , 565-56 6 (1988) . I n th e presen t

case , (he agency' s caa

e lackedreasonabl e basi s i n bot h la w an dfac t Therefore , a

n EAJA awar

dmus t b e granted . ARGUMEN T 1 . TH E APPLICAN T WA S TH E PREVAILIN G PART Y I n orde r t o b e eligibl e fo

r afe e award , unde

r th e EAJA , th e applicant

mus t b e th e prevailin g party . In Nacke l v . DOT , FAA, 884 F.2 d1378,137 9 (Fed . Cir . 1985) . Base d upo n the Unite dState s Supreme Court' s decisio n in Buckhanno n Boar dan dCar e Home . Inc . V . Wes t Virgini aDepartmen t

o f Healt h an dHvma

n Resources ^ 53 2 U.S . 59 8 (2001) , di e U.S . Cour t of Appeal s fo

r th e D i stric t of Columbi aCircui t

ha s distille dathree^par

t tes t fo r detenninin g whether

apart y ha s ""prevailed " fo

r purpose s o f

th e Equa l Acces s t o Justic e A d (EAJA) :

HO/tOO ®

SW Q * VV d Sl7LSeG1?S0 2 XV d Se:2 L 0L02/S2/8 0(1 ) ther e mus t b e a"court-ordere dchang e i n th e lega l relationship " o f

th e parties ; (2 ) th e judgmen t

mus t be in favo

r of th e part y seekin g fees ; an d(3 ) th e judicial pronouncement

mus t b e accompanie db

y judicial relief

. Turne r andCoona n v . N.T.S.B. . 60 8 F.3 d12 ; 201 0 U.S . App . LEXI S 11648 , * (D.C . Cir . 2010) . I n th e present

case , considerin g th e &ct

tha t the proceedin g wa s dismisse dwit h prejudice , it

i s irrefutabl e tha i Applicant wa s th e prevailin g part

y i n th e underlyin g proceedin g andachieve dcomplet e succes s in tha

t (1 ) there wa s a"court-ordere dchang e i n th e lega l relationship " o f

th e parties ; (2 ) th e judgment wa s i n favo

r o f th e part y seekin g fees ; an d(3 ) th e judicia l pronouncement wa s accompanie db y judicia l relief . Accordingly , Empire Airway s i s th e prevailin g party . 11 . TH E ADMINISTRATO RWA S NO T SUBSTANTIALL Y JUSTIFIE D I N INITIATIN G TH E ACTION . For th e Govenunent' s positio n t o b e substantiallyjustified , it s positio n mus t b e reasonabl e i

n fac t andlaw . Thus , th e lega

l theor y propounde dmus t

b e reasonable , th e facts aillege dmus t hav e areasonabl e basi s in truth , an dth e fact s allege dmus t

reasonabl y suppor

t th e lega l theory . Nicolai v De l Balzo . (I993)NTS B EA-3951 . I n th e cas e a t

bar , the mere fac t

that th e cas e wa s dismisse dbefor e ahearin g o

n th e merit s speak s volume s a s to th e Complainant' s lack of substantia l justificatio n i

n bringin g fort h th e maner , Th e Complainant' s complet e lack o f evidenc e to suppor

t it s conclusio n 5

8L0/S00i aSW Q * VV d21?L9eG1?S0 2 XV dZ£Z l OL02/9S/8 0conclusion suggest s tha t areasonabl e perso n wouldnot hav e proceede dwit

h th e actio n agains t tli e Applicant . I n th e instan

t case , th e Complainant

di dno t mak e adiligent

investigatio n befor

e initiatin g the matter . Furthermore , th e agency didno i fiill y evaluate potential andasserte d defenses , exculpator

y materials , an

dconstantly ask

a t ever y stag e whether

proceedin g furthe r wa s justified . A s aresult , th e Complainant' s investigatio n wa s neither objectiv e no

r complete . I f the agency' s investigatio n wa s objectiv e an dcomplete , th e Complainant would have realize dtha

t Entir e Airway s di dno t

operat e o r maintai n th e aircraf

t i n question ; and , a aaresult , wa s no t

th e proper

party . The Complainant' s cas e sufferedfi-oma n insufficiency o f evidence . A reasonabl e perso n facedwit h amoundo f

unrebutte devidenc e contradictin g th e agency' s position , canno t findtha t th e agency ha

dareasonabl e basi s i n la

w or fact o r wa s substantiallyjustifie din pursuin g th e matter . Withou t substantia l justificatio n o r

specia l circumstances , andwit

h th e Applican

t prevailin g o

n al l counts , th e Applicant

satisfie s th e requirement s to receiv e fe

e award s unde

r th e EAJA . Therefore , th e Applicant

respectfull

y submit s thi s applicatio n for attorney fee s an

d expenses .

8L0/900i a SM Q * VV d Sl7L9e6t20 2 XV d 68:^ 1 OLOS/SS/8 0NE T WORT H STATEMEN T I n accordanc e wit

h 1 4 CFR . § 14.0 3 (b)(5) . Applicant i s acorporatio n wit

h anet ^vort h o f no t mor e than $ 7 millio n an

dnot more tha n 500 employee s a

t th e time th e adversar y adjudicatio n wa s initialed .

TOTA L FEE S AN

D EXPENSE S SOUGH T Tota l fee s andexpense s fo

r whic h a n awar di s sought : $4,980 .

EAJ A Clai m $4,440.0 0 Attorney fee s (Gregor y S . Winton , Esq, ) Paralega l Lega l A.ssistan l Tota l jigur s 14. 8 5. 1

. 6 Rat e

$30 0 $100 $5 0 $510.0 0

$30.0 0 S4,980.0 0 I hereby certif

y under penalt y o f perjur y tha t th e information proyi3.3d ' i n taj s applicatio n i s tru e an dcorrect . Dated : Augus t

6,201 0 Respejttu^iy/u^mitted , GRBQGF^S . WINTON , ESQ . The AWwno

n Lav / Fir m One El^earc h Court , Suite 45 0 Rookville , M

D 2085 0 Te/ r 301-294-855 0 Fax ; 301-294-252 5 Counsel fo r

Applican t

SLO/iOOi a S W Q < • VV d sfrLseet^so s xv d se:s L OLOS/SS/S O

# 9 Aviatio n Lavt ^ Expert s 1 Researc h Cour t Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0

Bil l T o Empir e Airway s Joh n Zaremb a Rout e 109 , Hanga

r 3 Famiingdalc , N

Y 1173 5 

# Invoic e fo rLega l Service s Date 5/31/201 0 Invoic e #

ISO)

Dat e 5/3/201 0 1 5/5/2 0 J O 5/7/201 0

5/17/ZOI O

5/18/201 0

5/19/201 0 Descriptio n

Empir e Alr*ays : Lega l Service s Cal l wit h E dSo$ are : statu s an dstratsgy . Empir e Airways : Lega l Service s Meetin g wit h die mre ; ststu aan dstrategy . Empir e Airways : Lega l Service s Cull; ; wit h Joh n Zaremb are : stoiu s an dstrategy ; Revie w notic e o f

propoie dcivi l penally . Empir e Airways : Lega l Service s Revie w emai l fro mclien t re : statu s an dstrategy : Draf t lette r t o FA A re ; status ; Revie w nie . Empir e Airways ; Lega l Service s Cal l wit h Joh n Zaremb are : statu s an dstrategy ; Discusse dFA A failur e t o conduc t airma n checkride . Empir e Airways ; Lega l Service s Revie w an drespon dl o multipl e emiil s fro mFA A re : status ; Cal l wid i clien t re ; statu s an dstrategy ; Revie w lette r

fro mattorne y Casolaro ; Sen demai l re ; same ; Cal l FA A re : status ; Revie w multipl e email s re : status . Qt y 0. 1 1.5 0. 4 0. 4 0. 1 0. 3

Thank yo u for you r business . 1 Phon« « 1-877J.AJR-LA W Fax * 30 1 29 d252 5 E-mai l greB@A¥i*ionL?iwExpens.eoi n Rat e 300.0 0 300,0 0 300,0 0 300.0 0 300.0 0 300.0 0 Amoun t

30.0 0 450.0 0 120.00 120.00 30.0 0 90.0 0



## Tota l

w e b Sit e

WN*w,A*iatioDLn>n

E (fov.ca m Page l

810/800 ® SW Q * VV d 2171588^20 2 XV d e8'2 L OL02/S2/8 0

# ^ p Aviatio n La w Expert s 1 Researc h Cour t Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0 

# Invoic e fo rLega l Service s Dat e 5/31/201 0 Invoic e #

180 1 Bin T o Empir e Airway s Joh n Zaremb a Rout e 109 , Hanga

r 3 Fartniogdale , >f

Y 1173 5

Diit e 5/24/20) 0

5/25/201 0 5/2i$«0l 0 Descriptio n

Empir e Airways : Lega l Service s Revie w emai l fro mFAA ; Draf t email s t o clien t

re ; statu s an dstrategy ; Revie w file . Empir e Airways : Lega l Service s Cal l wit h clien t

re ; fligh t

instructio n an daircraf t charter . Empir e Airways : Lega l Service s Revie w multipl e email s re : statu s an dstrategy . Ql y 0. 1 0. 3 0. 1

Than k you fo r you r busiaess . Phone # |-B77-4-Aia-LA W fa x i f 30 1 29 4 25J 5 E-mai l ene®A»i3t)onUwExiie(u,c6m Rat e 300.0 0 300.0 0 300.0 0 Amoun t

30.0 0 90.0 0 30.0 0

Tota l S990.0 0

We b Sit e www.AvjaliDnLawExpc(TS,cgr n Pag e 2

8L0/G00i? ) SW Q * VV d 2tLSG6t?20 S XV d 88:2 1 OL02/S2/8 0

# 9 Aviatio n La w Expert s 1 Researc h Cour t Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0 

# Invoic e fo rLega l Service s Dat a 5/2S/201 0 Invoic e #

178 1 Bil l To Empir e Airway s Joh n Zaiemb a Rout e 109 , Hanga

r 3 Farmingdale , NY 1173 5

Date 5/17/201 0 5/17/201 0 5/17/201 0 Descriptio n

Photocopie s Fax Transmission s Postag e Qty 3 2 2

TTian k you fo r you r business . Phone d ]-m-A-AJR.-lAV

I Fax *

30 \29 4 2525 E-mai l 6nte@A v i«donLjwe?;p*rts.«ii

i Rat e 

## o. n

1.0 0 0.44 Amoun

t 0.3 3 2.0 0 0.8 8

T^^ta l j3,2 i

We b Site uiw w AviuJonUiwCxpcns.cu

n

SLO/OLO E S W O * VV d 2tLS8et20 2 XV d 88:2 1 0L02/S2/8 O

# 9 Aviatio n Lav r Expert s 1 Researc h Cour t Suit e 45 0 RockviUc , M D 2085 0 

# Invoic e fo rLega l Service s Dat e 6/30/201 0 Invoice #

191 3 Bil l T o Empir e Airway s Joh n Zaremb a Rotjt e 109 , Hanga

r 3 Faimingclale,bf

Y 1173 5

Dat e 6/21/201 0 Descriptio n

Empir e Paralega l Services : Researc h law ; Revie w file ; Drai ^ Motio n fo r Decisivn Erapir e Paralega l Services : Revie w an drevis e Motio n fo r Decision . Ql y 4. 5 0. 6

Than k yo u fo r you r business . Plione # |.g77.^-AlR-U W Fax # 30 1 29 4 2SJ 5 £-mai l

£cci;@AvialiDnLawE)(pen9.aj m Rat e 100.0 0 100.0 0 Amoun t

450.0 0 60.0 0



### Tota l S510.0 0 We b Sh e tfTMftv>vi«tionLi>»'Ej(piJrts.coin

8L0/LL0 ® SW Q ^ VVd 21?LS86t'20 2 XV d 88:2 1 0102/S2/8 0^ ^ Aviatio n La w Expert s 1 Researc h Cour t Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0

BiPT o Empir e Airway s Joh n Zaremb a Rout e 109 , Hanga

r 3 Farmingdole , N

Y 1173 5 

# Invoic e fo rLega l Service s 1 Dat e 6/30/201 0 Invoic e #

187 4

Dat e 6/1/201 0

6/2/201 0

6/.V20I 0

6/10/201 0 6/11/201 0 Than k yo u fo : y i Descriptio n

Empire Airways : Lega

l Service s Revie w FA

A enforcemen t

investigativ e repon ; Reviev v file ; Draf

t emai l re : statu s andstrategy ; Revie w Prehcarln e order ; Draf t motion fo

r continuance ; Draf

t notic e ofsubsiiiution ; Dnf t discover y requests ; Draf

t amende daffinnaiiv e defenses ; Researc h cas e lavir . Empir e Airways ; Lega

l Service s Review ani l revis e amende danswer . Fil e same ; Revie w FA

A discover

y requests ; Draf

t emai l requestin g records ; Dinf

l respons e to FA

A discoveiy ; Revis e djacoveiy ; Revie w email s re : statu s an dstrategy ; Multipl e call s wit h Ra y Toirc s re : insuranc e policy . Empire Airways : Lega

l Service s Revie w andrespon dt o emai l fromFA A attorne y re : statu s of discovery ; Review file re ; samo . Empire Airways : Lega

l Service s Call wit h La w Judg e re : hearin g date . Empir e Airways : Legal Service s Review file ; Conferenc e re : statu s an dstrategy ; Call wit h client re : same ; Researc h law . Qt y 4. 2

1. 8

0. 1 0, 1 0. 4 3u r business . Phon e # l-i77-4iAlR-LA W Fax # }0 I 29< t 2S2 S E-mai l

ljr4fi@AviixiMLivrEKpeni.com Rat e 300.0 0

300.0 0

300.0 0 300.0 0 300.0 0 Amoun t

1,260.0 0

540.0 0

30.0 0 30.0 0 120.0 0 

# Tota l 1

We b Sit e 1 wvwv.Avi«i«nljwe > (IKru.cDi n Page l

810/210 ® S W Q * • VV d 2l7LSeGt20 2 XV d es:2 L 0L02/S2/8 0

# 9 Aviatio n La w £xpert s 1 Researc h Cour t Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 208S 0

Bil l T o Empir e Airway s Joh n Zaremb a Rout e 109 , Hanga

r 3 Faxmingdale , NY 1173 5 

# Invoic e fo rLega l Service s Dal e 6/30/201 0 Invoic e *

1874

Dat e 6/18/201 0

(5/21/201 0

fi/22/2010 Descriptio n

Empir e Airways : Lega l Service s Revie w an drespon dl o FA A emai l re : stani s an d strategy ; Revie w FA A motio n to withdraw . Empir e Airways : Lega l Service s revie w an drevis e motio n t o dismiss . Empir e Airways : Lega l SCTVICC S Revie w Midrevis e motio n t o dismiss ; Prepar e fo r filing . Ql y 0. 4 0. 1 1. 6

Than k )(p u fo r you r business . Phon e # l-«77-«-AlR-LA W Fax # 30 1 29 4 253 J E-mai l grcg@AviiliatiLawEtper(S,co m Ral e 300.0 0 300.0 0 300.0 0 Amoun t

120.00 30.0 0 480,0 0

Tota l $2,610.0 0

We b Sit e ww.Avi3tionLBwExpcns,co m Pag e 2

8L0/SL0i a S W Q * VV d 21?LSeet'20 2 XV d t'e:2 L 0L02/S2/8 0

# 9 Aviatio n La w Expert s 1 Researc h Cour t Suit e 45 0 Rvckvill c M D 20S5 0 

# Invoic e fo rLega l Service s Dat e 6/30/201 0 Invoicnt f

185 9 BHlT o Empir e Airway s Joh n Zaremb a Rout e 109 , Hanga

r 3 Farmingdale , NY 1173 5

Dat e 6/1/201 0 6/22/201 0 Descriptio n

Empire : Lega l Assistan t Services : Research . Empire : Lega l Assistan t Services : Maile d informatio n t o client . Qt y 0. 5 0. 1

Than k yo u fo r you r business . Phon e l » l-877-J-AlR-U W Fax # 30129 4 252 5 E-mai l Ereg(gAviaiiortLawExpem,aji n Rat e 50.0 0 50.0 0 Amoun t

25.0 0 5.00



### Tota l $30.0 0 W a b Sit e u-wx<.'.A.vlariDnLawExpent.t:un i

8L0/t?L0i a S W Q <• VV d 21?LS86t20 2 XV d ts:2 L 0L02/S2/8 0

# 9 Aviatio n La w Expert s 1 Researc h Cour t Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M D 2085 0 

# invoic e fo rLega l Service s

Bil l T o Empir e Ainvay s Joli n Zaremb a Rout e 109 , Hangar s Farmingdale , N

Y 1173 5 Dat a 6/30/201 0 Invoic o #

184 9

Dat e 6/1/201 0 6/1/20) 0 6/1/201 0 6/l/Zfll O 6/2/201 0 6/2/201 0 6/2/201 0 6/2/201 0 6/22/201 0 16/22/201 0 6/22/201 0 Descriptio n

Photocopie s Postag e Postag e Fa x Transmission s pa x Transmission s Photocopie s Postag e Postag e photocopie s Postag e Postag e Qt y 2 0 2 1 7 1 2 4 8 2 1 3 6 I 2 Than k you fo r you r business .

r Phon e # l-«77-'1.AIR-LAW FBX # 30119 ^ 2S2 5 E-mai l Ercj^v-iaiionLawExpcni-CQn i 

## To t Rat e 0.1 1 0.7 8 0.6 1 1.0 0 1.0 0 0.1 1 0.6 1 0.7 8 

## O. n 1.7 3 1.2 2 Amoun t

2.2 0 1.5 6 0.6 1 7.00 12.0 0 5,2 8 1.1 2 0.7 8 3.9 6 1.7 3 2.44 

### 3 l $38.7 8 1

We b su e 1 •UNVi v AvlaiionUwEiqiws.coi n

8L0/SL0i a SW O + VV d 2tLSe61?20 2 XV d VSZ l 0L02/S2/8 0

# flp Aviatio n La w Expert s 1 Researc h Cour t Suit e 45 0 Rocloille , M D 2085 0 

# Invoic e fo rLega l Service s

Bil l T o Empir e Airway s Joh n Zaremb a Rout e 109 . Hanga

r 3 Farmingdale , N

Y 1173 5 Dat e 7/14/201 0 Invoice *

192 9 1

Dat e 7/6/201 0 7/6/201 0 7/6/201 0 7/V201 0 Descriptio n

Fa x Transmission s Photocopie s Postag e Postag e Qt y 1 0 2 0 2 1

Than k yo u fo r you r buainess . 1 Phone

# l-f77-4-AIR-U

W Fax #

30I29 4 242

S E-mai l

[in:g@AvJB»ionUwExpefW,M m Rat e 1.0 0 0.1 1 0.44 0.6 1 Amoun t

10.00 2.2 0 0.8 8 0,6 1

1

Tota l $13.6 9

We b sit e vvww,AviiUionLawExp«rt$,ean i

810/910 0 S W Q < • VV d 2*1586*20 2 XV d te:2 L OL02/S2/8 0

# ^p Aviatio n La w Expert s 1 Researcl i Cour t Suit e 45 0 Roclfville , M D 2085 0 

# Invoic e fo rLega l Service s Dal e 7/31/201 0 Invoic e #

195 3 Bil l T o Empir e Airway s Jo!( mZEiremb a Rout e 109 , Hanga

r 3 hamiingdale , N Y 1173 5

1 Dal e 7/1/20J 0

7/6/201 0

7/23/201 0 Descriptio n

Empir e Airways ; Lega l Service s Revie w FA A notic e o f

witlidrtiwal ; Revie w fil e re : status . Empir e Airways : Lega l Service s Revie w file; Cal l wit h la w judg e TC : siatus ; Draf t motion ; Sen demai l t o judg e re : statu s o f case ; Revie w fil e re : statu s an dstrategy . Etopii e Airways : Lega l Service s Revie w fil e re : status ; Draf t emai l t o judg e re ; same ; Cal l wii h judge' s offic e re; servic e o f order ; Draf

t EAJ A applicfltjon ; Researc h law ; Revie w file; Revie w an drevis e EAJ A application . Qt y 0. 1 0. 7

2

Than k yo u fo r you r business . Phone # l.g17-4-A]R-LA W Fax # 30129 4 252S E-mal t eitK@Avi»lKmLjnvF~"«pens.CB m Ral e



## Tota l 300.0 0

300.0 0

300.0 0 Amouff

l 30.0 0 210.0 0

600.0 0

$840.0 0 We b Sit e •»^vw.AviationLa*E » pens , co m

8L0/iL0i a SW O * VVd 2t?LSeei?20 2 XVd 1^8:2 1 0L02/S2/8 0CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I liereby certif

y tha t I hav e thi s dat

e mailed , postag e prqiaid , a n origina l an dthre e copie s o f th e foregoing NUNC PRO TUN C Applicatio n fo r a n Awar do f Attorney Fee s andOther Expense s Pursuant

to th e Equa

l Acces s to Justic e Ac t

(EAJA ) addresse dto ; Attention : Hearin g Docket Clerk , AGC-43 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue . S.W . Room924A Washington , D.C . 2059 1 I hereb y certif

y tha t J hav e thi s date sent

vi afacsimil e an dU.S . mail , postag e prepaid , copie s of the foregoing NUN C PRO TUN C Applicatio n fo r a n Awar dof Attorney Fee s aiK

l Othe r Expense s Pursuan

t t o th e Equal Acces s t o Justic e Ac t (EAJA ) addresse dto : Honorabl e Isaac D . Beoki n Office o f Hearings , M-2 0 Room541 1 U.S . Department

o f Transportatio n 40 0 Sevent

h Street , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 0 Tel ; (202 ) 366-213 2 Fax ; (202 ) 366-753 6 Zachar y M . Berman , Esq . Office o f Assistant Chie f Counse l F A A Easter

n Region , AEA- 7 1 Aviatio n Plaza , Roo m56 1 Jamaica , NY 1143 4 Tel ; 718-553-325 8 Fax : 718-995-569 9 Dated : Augus t

6.201 0 GREGOR Y S . WINTON , ESQ . On^Researc h Court , Suite 45 0 Rockville , MD 2085 0

8L0/8L0 @ S W Q <• VV d 2t?lS8Gt?20 2 XV d 178:2 L 0L02/S2/8 0