alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Fewer Young Adults Rely on the Emergency Department for Routine Care      

# Fewer Young Adults Rely on the Emergency Department for Routine Care

According to a study published in the *Annals of Emergency Medicine,*following the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, the annual rate of emergency department visits by young adults, ages 19-25, decreased by 1.4 percent, representing 191,000 fewer visits. 

http://www.ahrq.gov/news/blog/ahrqviews/031115.html
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)      

# National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS)

The NCVS is the nation’s primary source for information on criminal victimization. Data is reported on the likelihood of victimization by certain types of assault and by different segments of the population such as women, the elderly, and racial groups.

https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=dcdetail&iid=245
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Verisity Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Moshe Gavrielov, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|      |  |                |  |                        
|----- |  | -------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | March 11, 2004 |  | /s/    MOSHE
GAVRIELOV 
|      |  |                |  | Moshe Gavrielov        
|      |  |                |  | Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7707

CARDELL LAMONT AVENT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

RANDALL C. MATHENA, Warden, Wallens Ridge State Prison,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., 

District Judge. (3:11-cv-00605-JAG)

Submitted: July 25, 2013 Decided: August 13, 2013

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cardell Lamont Avent, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Cardell Lamont Avent seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition.* The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

 * We previously remanded this case to the district court for 

the limited purpose of enabling the court to determine whether 

Avent had shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an 

extension of time to appeal. See Avent v. Mathena, 2013 WL 

738320 (4th Cir. Feb. 28, 2013). On remand, the district court 

granted his motion for extension of time to file a notice of 

appeal. Avent’s appeal is therefore deemed timely filed.
3

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Avent has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
From: To: DEPARTMENTOFTHENAVY NAVALSTRIKEANDAIRWARFARECENTER 4755PastureRoad,BLDG465

FALLON,NV89496-5000

Commander, Naval Strike and Air Warfare Center Department of the Navy Representative, FAA Western Service Area (ANM-903) 3770 Ser N3/119 31 Mar 15

Subj: PETITION FOR EXEMPTION FROM FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION PART 91.215(e)
Ref: (a) NAS Fallon ltr 3770 Ser 307/0165 of 10 Feb 89 (b) FAR Part 11, Subpart B (c) NSAWC ltr 3770 Ser N3/270 of 5 Nov 12 (d) Federal AviationAdministration Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-8863, Exemption No. 6741G of January 2, 2013
1. Reference (a) was the original Naval Air Station, Fallon request for a grant of exemption to Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR 91.24, now FAR 91.215(e), per reference (b), namely to allow Transponder-off operations within a predefinedportion of the Fallon Range Training Complex. Reference (c) is the most recent request by the Naval Strike andAirWarfare Center (NSAWC) to extend this exemption, which was subsequently granted per reference (d)

. 2. The current extension to the original exemption expires on 31 March 2015. Request this grant of exemption to FAR 91.215(3) be extended to 31 March 2017. The tactical operational requirements establishedby reference (a) and reaffirmed by reference (c) remain valid. NSAWC continues to maintain close coordination with Oakland Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) and Salt Lake CityARTCC to achieve compliance with the requirements listed in the conditions and limitations clause as establishedunder the grant of exemption.
3. If there are any questions I canbe reached at (775) 426-3591 or DSN 890-3591.

Copy to: FAA Headquarters (AAT-6) COMNAVAIRPAC (N32) CO, NAS Fallon ATCFO, NAS Fallon 

# $1:~ By direction
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

59–011 WASHINGTON : 2015

[ERRATA] 

114th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 114–64 

SOCIAL SECURITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE 

UNITED STATES AND THE CZECH RUPUBLIC 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT AMENDING THE AGREEMENT ON 

SOCIAL SECURITY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC SIGNED AT PRAGUE ON SEPTEMBER 

23, 2013, PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 433(e)(1); SSA, SEC. 233(e)(1) 

OCTOBER 6, 2015.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed 

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
ERRATA 

The referenced Document, referred to the House Committee on 

Ways and Means, was inadvertently printed with a misspelling in 

the title. The appearance of ‘‘RUPUBLIC’’ should be replaced with 

‘‘REPUBLIC’’ 

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
#### Julian L. Hoffman, Appellant, v Lotte Hoffman, Respondent.

Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the memorandum decision of this court and the order entered thereon on December 19, 1978 *807[66 AD2d 717] are vacated and recalled, said order resettled and a new memorandum decision substituted therefor as follows: Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 6, 1978, which dismissed the husband’s complaint, awarded a judgment of divorce to defendant-respondent on her counterclaim, awarded joint custody of the 18-year-old son of the parties with a direction that the son, whose physical residence is with his father, spend at least one full month per year with his mother during which the husband is to pay $50 per week for the son’s support; and directed the husband to pay a counsel fee of $10,000 to the wife with credit for $2,250 already paid to one attorney during the course of the trial, is unanimously modified, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, to the extent of vacating the award of joint custody to the wife; striking the provision which directed the husband to pay $50 per week to the wife for the son’s support and reducing the award of alimony from $800 per week to $500 per week, retroactive to the date of judgment with no credit for overpayments and providing that the counsel fees shall include the services on this appeal. In a matrimonial action where there are cross claims for divorce on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment the court may properly consider and balance the several factors in the case *(Hessen v Hessen,*33 NY2d 406). Furthermore, the trial court was in the best position to assess the credibility of the witness. Where the testimony on any points is convoluted or contradictory, the trier of the facts has an advantage in being able to observe the witness firsthand. Therefore, his conclusions regarding credibility, intelligence, or bias should be given particular consideration. *(McLaughlin v McLaughlin,*53 AD2d 729.) It appears the court determined that although both parties contributed to the marital discord, the husband’s conduct alone rose to the level of cruel and inhuman treatment. On this record we are not prepared to hold the court abused its discretion in granting the divorce to the wife and dismissing the husband’s complaint. The award of joint custody and support is unwarranted. The mother has expressed no desire for custody and Peter, at 18, is old enough to choose which of either parent he wishes to spend his time with. The record reveals the wife’s actual expenses are closer to $2,100 per month than the $3,166 per month which she claims. The award of $800 per week is excessive and alimony in the sum of $500 per week appears to be adequate. The counsel fee was within proper bounds for services not already compensated by the wife, but should include services rendered in connection with this appeal. Resettled order signed and filed. Concur—Birns, J. P., Evans, Fein, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
laiTOsasi C.J. Gibbon 

# ritettay

, Pickering J. court lacked jurisdiction to sentence him because there was no enacting clause set forth in the Nevada Revised Statutes. Appellant's claim did not implicate the jurisdiction of the district court. 

### See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 6; NRS 171.010. We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

cc: Hon. Jerome T. Tao, District Judge Tyon Hopkins Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A 4(1e0,
- Skip to main content
- About Us
- Contact Us
- FAQs
-  Language Assistance ****   - English
  - español
  - 中文: 繁體版
  - Việt-ngữ
  - 한국어
  - Tagalog
  - Русский

U.S. Department of Education

U.S. Department of Education

            - Student Loans
            - Grants
            - Laws
            - Data

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        | PurposeFunding StatusEligibilityLaws, Regs, & GuidanceApplicant InfoResourcesAwardsFAQsPerformanceContacts |  |
| Office of Postsecondary Education Home |
|                                        |

## FY 2023

                - New Award     MS Excel  (10K) 
                - Project Abstract     PDF   (595K) 

## FY 2022

                - New and Supplemental Awards    MS Excel  (11K) 
                - Project Abstracts for New Awards    PDF   (222K)  
                - Project Abstracts for Supplemental Awards (please see FY 2021 abstracts below)

## FY 2021

                - New Award    MS Excel  (10.1K)
                - Project Abstract    PDF  (163K)

## FY 2020

                - New Award    MS Excel  (10.7K)
                - Project Abstract    PDF  (131K)

## FY 2019

                - New Award    MS Excel  (9.75K)
                - Project Abstract    PDF  (20K)

## FY 2018

                - New Award    MS Excel  (9.6K)
                - Project Abstract    PDF  (36K)

FIPSE Home

----

 

 Printable view

## How Do I Find...

          - Student loans, forgiveness
          - Higher Education Rulemaking
          - College accreditation
          - Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
          - FERPA
          - FAFSA
          - 1098, tax forms

More >

## Information About...

          - Elevating Teaching
          - Early Learning
          - Engage Every Student
          - Unlocking Career Success
          - Cybersecurity

 

----

*Our mission*

Student Loans
Repaying LoansDefaulted LoansLoan ForgivenessLoan Servicers

Grants & Programs
Apply for Pell GrantsGrants ForecastApply for a Grant

Laws & Guidance
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)FERPACivil RightsNew IDEA Website

Data & Research
Education StatisticsPostsecondary Education DataED Data ExpressNation's Report CardWhat Works ClearinghouseOpen Data PlatformCOVID Relief Data

About Us
Contact UsED OfficesJobsPress ReleasesFAQsRecursos en españolBudget, PerformancePrivacy Program

----

          - Notices
          - FOIA
          - Privacy Policy
          - Accessibility
          - Security
          - Information quality
          - Inspector General
          - Whitehouse.gov
          - USA.gov
          - Benefits.gov
          - Regulations.gov
          - vote.gov
809.507-1 Solicitation provisions. ( a ) While conflicts of interest may not presently exist, award of certain types of contracts may create potential future organizational conflicts of interest (see FAR 9.508 for examples). If a solicitation may create a potential future organizational conflict of interest, the contracting officer shall insert a provision in the solicitation imposing an appropriate restraint on the contractor's eligibility for award of contracts in the future. Under FAR 9.507-1, the restraint must be appropriate to the nature of the conflict and may exclude the contractor from award of one or more contracts in the future.
( b ) The provision at 852.209-70, Organizational Conflicts of Interest, must be included in any solicitation for the services addressed in FAR 9.502.
[85 FR 60076, Sept.24, 2020]
**Lauralyn (“Laura”) J. Remo**

**DOT, Office of Aviation Analysis, Air Carrier Fitness Division, X**

**- 56**  **1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590**  **United States of America**

Dear Ms. Remo.

The community

of Coffman Cove, Alaska is located on the North east side of Prince of Wales I sland. We have had some of the worst service for delivering the mail from Taguan Air in Ketchikan. Taguan Air, Pacific Airway s and Promech Air, have display ed that the only thing there companies care about is the people who c ome off the cruise ships during the summer months. Some weeks our communit y goes without mail delivery for an y reason, this put people like me in harms way due to the proscription that come in the mail don’t get here in a timel y manner. It has been common practice for the air carrier not to fly the mail rout for no reason.

We need to have a company like Island Air Express taking our mail. I have been a customer of Island Air express since they started service. In the y ears I have been fl yi ng with them hav e I been very pleased with the service they provide. They

are very professional they

go the extra mile to make sure you have a safe flight. They have shown that they reall y care about the people on Prince of Wales I sland. Island Air Express has shown sinc e going into service the reliabilit y that the people on Prince of Wales Island need in an Air carrier. Island Air express is on time, they can fl y in bad weather, and their Planes air the best in the industry

. The other air carriers, Promech Air, Pacific Airway s and Taquan Air have shown disrespect for the people of Prince of Wales Island with the lack of on time service, say ing they

will be there and at the last minute cancelling the flight or leaving because they wanted to go earl y. This kind of service is the normal routine of these Companies. As Vice May or of the City of Coffman Cove, Alaska there is onl y one company that I would recommend and only one company

I will use and that is Island Air Express!

Thank y ou, sincerely Br yc e Brucker, Vice May o r, City of Coffman Cove
, Alaska. P.O Box 18046 Coffman Cove, Alaska 99918
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Distraction.gov      

# Distraction.gov

Distraction.gov provides wide array of information and resources about distracted driving including information from the 2010 summit on distracted driving, campaign tools, facts, statistics and research, information about laws in different states related to distracted driving, speeches, press releases and other resources for the media.

http://www.distraction.gov/