NBSIR 78- 1468-2

Committee on the Challenges

of Modern Society Rational

Use of Energy Pilot Study

Modular Integrated Utility

Systems Project

Final Report

VOLUME 2 MINUTES OF PROJECT MEETINGS

Prepared by:

MODULAR kyx°jmius INTEGRATED UTILITY SYSTEMS

improving community utility services by supplying

electricity, heating, cooling, and water/ processing

liquid and solid wastes/ conserving energy and

natural resources/ minimizing environmental impact U.S. Department of Commerce

National Bureau of Standards

Center for Mechanical Engineering and Process Technology

Washington, D.C. 20234

June, 1978

Prepared for: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Division of Energy, Building Technology and Standards

Office of Policy Development and Research

Washington, D.C. 20410

NATO/CCMS NO. 74-2

NBSIR 78-1468-2

COMMITTEE ON THE CHALLENGES

OF MODERN SOCIETY RATIONAL

USE OF ENERGY PILOT STUDY

MODULAR INTEGRATED UTILITY

SYSTEMS PROJECT

FINAL REPORT

VOLUME 2 MINUTES OF PROJECT MEETINGS

M.H. Nimmo, Secretary, CCMS-MIUS Project

National Bureau of Standards

C.W. Phillips, Chairman, CCMS-MIUS Project

and Manager of Integrated Energy Systems

National Bureau of Standards

Prepared by:

U.S. Department of Commerce

National Bureau of Standards

Center for Mechanical Engineering and Process Technology

Washington, D.C. 20234

Prepared for: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Division of Energy, Building Technology and Standards

Office of Policy Development and Research

Washington, D.C. 20410

June, 1978

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary

Dr. Sidney Harman, Under Secretary

Jordan J. Baruch, Assistant Secretary for Science and Technology

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, Director

FOREWORD

The Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society - Modular Integrated

Utility System (CCMS-MIUS) Project was established by the NATO CCMS in

1974 as a result of strong international interest in improving methods

for providing better utility services to communities. The CCMS-MIUS

Project is a sub-project of the pilot study Rational Use of Energy.

Both are piloted by the United States.

The CCMS-MIUS Project has been carried out under the leadership and

sponsorship of the United States Department of Housing and Urban

Development (HUD), Division of Energy, Building Technology and Standards,

Office of Policy Development and Research. The National Bureau of

Standards provided technical support to HUD.

The major objective of this project was to develop and implement a mechanism for the exchange of technical information on Modular Integrated

Utility Systems (MIUS) Type of Projects in participating countries.

During the project several important products were developed, including

a glossary of special terms, a catalog of project descriptions and a standard methodology for reporting the performance of MIUS Type of

Proj ects

This project marks the beginning of a significant exchange of information.

Further work is required to develop the mechanism more completely and

bring about actual exchanges of technical information. This is reflected

in the recommendations of the CCMS-MIUS Project committee at its last

meeting July 12-14, 1977 in Turin.

This report is in two volumes. The first volume includes a chronology

and description of the project, its activities, and products, and a copy of each product developed. Volume two includes the minutes of the

CCMS-MIUS Project meetings.
CONTENTS

VOLUME 2 Page

APPENDICES

F - Minutes of CCMS-MIUS Project Meeting

April 10-11, 1975 (Brussels, Belgium) FI

G - Minutes of CCMS-MIUS Project Meeting

December 9-10, 1975 (Apeldoorn, The Netherlands) ... G1

H - Minutes of CCMS-MIUS Project Meeting

May 18-19, 1976 (Moret-sur-Loing, France) HI

I - Minutes of CCMS-MIUS Project Meeting

December 7-9, 1976 (Juelich, W. Germany) II

J - Minutes of CCMS-MIUS Project Meeting

July 12-14, 1977 (Turin, Italy) J1
APPENDIX F

MINUTES

OF THE

CCMS-MIUS PROJECT MEETING

April 1975 (Brussels)

FI

MINUTES (Summary Form)

April 10-11, 1975

Modular Integrated Utility System Project (MIUS)

of the

Rational Use of Energy Pilot Study

of the

Committee on the Challenges o^ Modern Society (CCMS)

The first meeting of the CCMS-MIUS Project was held April 10-11,

1975 at NATO-CCMS Headquarters in Brussels. Twenty experts from seven countries were in attendance. A list of attendees is attached (Attachment A).

C.W. Phillips , Manager of the NBS/HUD-MIUS Program chaired the meeting.

The experts in attendance were welcomed to NATO Headquarters, Brussels

hy Mr. T. Kester, NATO Scientific Affairs Division. Mr. F. Sudarski of

the NATO Executive Secretariat assisted in arrangements for the meeting.

Mr. F. Allen Harris, Special Assistant to the Honorable Russel E. Train,

Head of the United States Delegation to CCMS and Mr. Cameron Sanders,

U.S. CCMS Officer at NATO in Brussels described the current status of CCMS

and of the pilot project on Rational Use of Energy, of which the CCMS-MIUS

Project is a part. Mr. J.H.Rothenberg, Director of the MIUS Program in

the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and principal U.S.

representative to the CCMS-MIUS Project, described, on behalf of the U.S. in it

lead role, the goals and objectives of the CCMS-MIUS Project. He further

described, as part of the committee's agenda on technical presentations

of MIUS type of projects by experts in the participating countries, the

HUD-MIUS Program in the U.S. He specifically discussed its goals and

previous achievements.

The experts in attendance from the participating countries described

the MIUS type of projects in their countries.

Mr. Harris, the U.S. CCMS Coordinator, and Mr. Phillips, the Chairman,

presented a draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for consideration

by the experts representing the participating countries. The experts

elected to operate on an informal basis employing a roundtable discussion

technique rather than on a formal basis.

Mr. Phillips presented a draft glossary of terms unique to integrated

utility systems prepared by the U.S. delegation. The preparation of this

document had been prepared in three languages to provide a common

understanding of terms unique to integrated utility systems. Mr. Phillips

and Mr. Leighton of HUD toured Europe in December, 197^- to locate and learn

of integrated utility systems interest and to seek and encourage

representation to the CCMS-MIUS Project Committee meetings. During this

period those who were contacted agreed that the glossary should be prepared

as the first task. The draft glossary of terms was discussed and comments

were recorded. The U.S. agreed to prepare a revised draft including comments

and some additional terms for submission to the committee at their second

meeting for approval.

The committee further discussed the needs and tasks to facilitate the exchange

of information on integrated utility systems.

F3
The U.S. agreed to prepare a draft for submission to the committee at

their second meeting the following:

a) Standard Methodology for reporting information on projects

b) Standard data units

c) Format for a one-page sheet describing any on-going or planned project

for which data is to be made available to other participants.

Subsequent to the meeting the U.S. prepared three documents in draft

form for submittal to the December 1975 meeting. They were a one page

reporting form. Project Summary Form, to provide the basis of the

"Project Catalog", an evaluation form, and an outline describing the

elements of a uniform methodology for measuring performance resulting

from testing and demonstration of CCMS-MIUS related projects. Refer

to the agenda attached.

F4
CO X33i-43

ON 3 X r3

4-1

X 3 o Z

PQ• 3 O -3 00 • H LX

Pm 1—1

oo

r 3 o 3 3 e 1—1 •H O o -X

CO c O o o

CO 3 X Pi CN w CO X) X

pi 3 3 CU • Q CJ CO 34 • CJ O r—i <2 z < CO i—1 • X) o #* CO o 3 PC CN 3 vj- • *

r—I n cx 31 3 3 3 CO O 3 CD X 3

X! 00 o rC 00 3 3 PQ 3 3 2 •H X b 3 40 > o CO rH CO o lOi 3 2 o 04 -4t £2

Xi—i O m H 40

<2z eo

4h o o Pi

0) «• U CO •H 3

4-1 *H

4-4 CtJ O 4-4 4-4 *3 O o 3 r—i

CN CN 3 3 in m 3 O o o

CO •H CN CN 3

4-4 •H • X • o i—I a CJ • o CJ 3 p4 • * • 3 Q 3 a 30 3 o CO E 3 •* *s *\ 3 3 3 o 3 3 3 3 O o O 3 3 3 x 3 3 CO 34 rH 00 3 00 00 1—1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Q <2 •H •H •H 3 • -3 r3 43 -3 3

CO X) CO 3 CO CO 3 • 3 3 00 3 3 3

Co 3 Z X Z x PQ

OO 3

<X> 3 3 X 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 CO 3 O £ •H £ PC 34 3

34

O

X

O 4-4 3 i—1 £ i—1 o 3 3 X o 3 3 3 > < H > 3 3 3 3 <2 3 3 3 CO 30 ^4 Z

30 3 £ 00 £ C4 4-4 <-o 3 O z tn 3 O o 3 3 o a 3 r-l 43 3 3 •H 3 3 3 CJ W 3 H i—1 34 > 3 3 O < O 3 3 3 3 3 rH •H

CN P4

Q 30 £ 3 O 3 3 3 3 CO X 3 3 X 4-4 3 3 3 3 3 00

<3 o 43 3 3 Pi 3 X 3

CJ 3 cj 40 34 •H 3 rH

Pi •H 3 3 3 3 >4 CJ Ch 3 o 3 a 3 po 30 oo o a 3 •H 3 • 3 CO J • • 3 O 4-4 3 X) CO 3 CO CO CO 3 Z 4-4 3 3 • 3 < • • O H O Pi 3 PO W po po

00

>43

40 3 3 i—1 3 3 i—1 3 3 X 3 43 3 3 3 3 3 3 40 X O 3

-X

OO

a 3 P4X

>> 40 Pi E 3 3 X 40 • 3 PQ • 3 3 O X CJ s CO

U4 00 3 • s 3 « 3 3 U £ 3

<!

O E 3 3 O z Xi • o •H X •H 3

<2 3 3 i—1 3 • • 3 X E X £ X X w 3 X 3 X z CJ

F5
bDG

•rHO

VO ft

cto Sh 1 0 < CO H

ft ft

CD _d- o a} s G

on MO

g TS i—i 3 O

CM

J- p cd 0— *H s o O £ 3 *H G OJ bD CM cm O bD 3 i—1 1—1 •rH G i—1 U r 3 ft • bD 3 3 bD PQ pq o o rH •h pq 0)

0)u o > ' CO • • PQ CO •> •rH G G CD Q o CO G CD CD G o

CO it 3 rH 3 CD ft CD f—1

o5 r. r* CM

G i—1 3 -p -P

G •H CM

w c c 3 CO

a CQ CD Td

cc o o a; E 3 CO o > G t*— Q p ft ft 3 Td 0 <D -P cd Q bC bD 3 ft G

#> CO

G

G < c c G 3 PQ a) i—i <; CD <D

•rH •rH o •*

a I CD ft

O & o PC O 3 rC O p cn C/D a; o ft -P o o CO cd

cd cd 3 o - O ft CD

O CD P K ir\ CO rH O S CM ft P*H

cc

ft. • i—1 O S>5 cd 1 ft c ft

cd i—i ! X CD E

CD

V

G

r ! p C CD c £ ! CD CD ft cd O ft bD r—S CD G r •H ! • ft CD tS) LTN i ft ft

•' cd CO CD

G

r ft ft CD CQ -P CO o CO •H

ft CO CQ

G o G 0 O 1 O cd ft CD f—1

CD ft

ft

G ft -P o ft co ! 1 CO -P 3 G CM G 3 i—1 CD ft CO G cd cd r—1 CD

.• •H cd ft 0 1 0 CO ft G PQ c cd cd CD CO cd 1 c r ft VO ft ft 3

ft ft

G cd

a cd CO cd

G

G E a; >5 <D ft <D <D PQ ft it CD O CD CO c ft OO ft 3 o o PQ CO C/D cd ft -i G OO c CD W E O • O ft 0 o cd oo G G Eh ft ft O ft O CM G LTN -P on CD < < o o

Eh On ft ft CO -4" ft ft o ft CM i—1 ooI < I 3 ft •H bD o E 3 3 bD C/D G

GG 3 rH ft 3 3 3 c •H 3 O CO CD ft a i—1

ft ft CQ 3 > G

•H ft bD (D

G 3 H ft •H ft

ftG < CD ft 3 G

C 3 3 p P

cd cd ft 3 i—1 3 O ft CQ 3 3 cd i—t > ft G G 3 •H G •H •H CQ ft ft 3 G ft 3 •H 3 i G 5 O 3 O 3 3 3 ft 3 ft G 3 3 O 3 ft G G G

ft CD CO •H CD •H 3 ft

C ft 3 •H ft 3 - r-3

G ft 3 < •H 3 3 1 o CO ft ft G -p 3 p 3 G Q E o •H ft cd ft G

1—1 G CQ o •H 3 cd bD o 3 •H ft

q ft

G cdG 3 ft 3 3

Eh o CD 3 g •rH

G o 3 1—1 3 <! •H ft 3 3 3 ft ft

G o 1 < U ft ft ft g ft i—1

ft ft 3 3 i—1

ft •H

G < 3

CM

OO •rH 3 •rH ft ft 3 Ph rH

p cd ft 3 i—1 3 ft 3 3 ; M >5 G 3 G ft i—I 3 ft < ft ft ft 3 3 g cd P •H 3 CO ft 3 bD 3 ft 3 G bD G •H G ft ft ft 3 3 ft 1 G •H 3 j <c G 3 G CD O 3 3 3 3 c. H 3 •rH •rH ft 3 ft ft r—

3 G o CD CD rH 3 > G •H ft 3 C 3 3 - 3 ft G bD 3 ft 3 •H > O

ftGG 3 O *H ft 3 3 O ft ft 3 TS 3 3 O 3 •H 3 -P <1; •H ft o W 3 ft O C CQ ft 3 •H •H P 3 ft i—1 P cd ft G p -p 3 i PQ G P CD O ft CO ft 3 ft 3 3 o 1 ft 3 3 M 3 3 i ft CD CD ft 3 G •rH G •rH G ft 3 •H c ft •H bD *H ss 3 G O i—1 g ft 3 3 C rH 0 > 3 G O 3 G ft 3 CM G 3 3 •H 3 G CD CD Cd o 3 3 < •H E ft •H 3 Cd •H 3 3 •H 3 CO X Q I CD C O CD ft 3 •rH •H G ft CQ ft ft 3 ft 3 •H 3 3 •H G ft 1 ft • 3 O G Cd rH •H ft C/D O 3 G 3 3 -H s 3 Eh G ft G •> o ! •H “H •rH G 3 > •rH •H •H 3 CQ ft 3 i—1 3 |> G ft •rH ft 3 o ft o • ft ft i> 3 3 G l—1 > ft G ft 3 ft ft G G 3 C ft 3 3 > Eh CQ Eh w

ft 3 G rG 3 O ft

CD o •H 3 •rH PQ ft 3 •* •H 3 ft 3 G ft i—1 G < ft < • 1 O ft W CO ft Q ft P ft ft Q rH Q CQ Eh PQ P ft ft < ft a ft w

COft •H o 1—1 ,rH 1 1—1

cd 1 •H 3 1—t 1 rC •rH CD 3 cd 1 P. G G -—

G G i—1 C ft •H 3 G 3 ft O •rH 3 •H 3 bD •rH • 3 3 3 3 cd ft 3 •H G r^ W O 3 3 rH 3 i—( G G 3 C/D p G 3 }> i—1 •H ft O 3 s P c p c CD o 3 rH •H 2 O -p cd •H

w o CD

QGO o o -P 3 O T} rH

p

r—1 • 3 3 CQ

G 3 Ph 3 •rH P rH c rH o ft Q • G

““ •H < O E 3 ft ts) < j, G •—-t ft O E i—l

+3

H

J »—1

ft • O • CD •H 3 3 • cd • 1 o w ft ft »-3 CQ ft ft EH S (P ^ 1 F6
RATIONAL IJS K 01'' ENERGY

CCMS-M1 US (Modular Integrated Utility Systems)

EXPERTS MEETING

April 10 and 11, 1975

Room 17 (Next to Press Theater - Use Press Entrance)

NATO HEADQUARTERS BUILDING

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM

Meeting Hours: Thursday, April 10; 1000 to 1?00 and 1400 to 1630

Friday, April 11; 0930 to 120c and 1330 to 1500

Simultaneous Translation (French-English, English- French)

Meeting Chairman - Clinton W. Phillips, Sr. Mechanical Engineer

Office of Energy Conservation, U.S. National Bureau of

Standards

Ma.nager, NBS Team, HUD-MIUS Program

TENTATIVE AGENDA

April 10 - 1000

WELCOMING REMARKS

- F. A. Harris, U.S. CCMS Coordinator

OVERVIEW OF RATIONAL USE OF ENERGY PILOT STUDIES

- William M. Porter, U.S. Federal Energy Administration

NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN INTEGRATED UTILITIES

- Brief Discussions of current activities by representatives in attendance

RECESS FOR LUNCH

Aoril 10 - 1400

WORK SESSION ON PROJECT TASK NO. 1: - GLOSSARY FOR INTEGRATED UTILITY SYSTEMS

(Note: Draft copies distributed to most participants in advance of

meeting. Extra copies in French, German and English will be

available at the meeting)

.

- Detailed Bariev of Draft Glossary by Participants

- Resolution of comments; additions, changes and deletions

- Further Action on Glossary

F7
April 13. - 0930

NEXT CCMS-MIUS PROJECT TASKS

- Standard Methodologies for evaluation

- Uniform Data Format

FUTURE POSSIBLE CCMS-MIUS PROJECT TASKS

- Demonstrations of Integrated Utility Systems or Subsystems

- Innovati\a Technology Demonstrations

- Identification of On-going or Planned Research

- Other

OTHER BUSINESS

DATE OF NEXT MEETING

ADJOURNMENT (Not later than 1500 hours, April 11)

F8
APPENDIX G

MINUTES

OF THE

CCMS-MIUS PROJECT MEETING

December 1975 (Apeldoorn

)

G1

MINUTES (Summary Form)

December 9 - 10, 1975

Modular Integrated Utility System Project (MIUS)

• of the

Rational Use of Energy

of the

Committee on Challenges of Modern Society (CCMS)

The second meeting of the CCMS-MIUS Project was held on December 9 and 10,

1975, at the laboratories of the Netherlands Organization for Applied

Science Research (TNO) in Apeldoorn, the Nether lanas . Twenty-six experts

from eight countries were in attendance. A list of the attendees is

attached (Attachment A). A copy of the agenda is attached (Attachment B)

The experts in attendance were welcomed to the Netherlands by the Honorable

Kingdon Gould, Jr., United States Ambassador to the Netherlands, and to

TNO by Mr. J.A. Knobbout, of “he Centre for the Study of Energy Problems

(TNO). C.W. Phillips (USA) was the meeting Chairman.

Mr. F. Allen Harris, Special Assistant to the Honorable Russell E. Train,

Head of the United States Delegation to CCMS, and Mr. Cameron Sanders,

U.S. CCMS Officer at NATO in Brussels described the current status of

CCMS and of the pilot project on Rational Use of Energy, of which the

CCMS-MIUS Project is a part. Mr. J . H. Rothenberg , Manager of the MIUS

Program in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and

principal U.S. representative' to the CCMS-MIUS Project, described, on

behalf of the U.S. lead role, the goals and objectives of the CCMS-MIUS

Project.

Principal business of the two-day meeting included:

1. Approval for completion and issuance of the CCMS-MIUS Glossary. Comments

received by February 1, 1976, to be incorporated in the final version.

2. Discussion in detail of the purposes, data forms and procedures for

development of a "Project Catalog" of on-going or planned projects in any

of the participating countries, from which technical data of value in

evaluating or comparing integrated utility systems, would be listed.

A committee titled "Data Format Committee" charged with responsibility

to produce and maintain this "Project Catalog" was established with the

U.S. in the lead role. The committee consisted of C. W. Phillips (U.S.A.),

Chairman, K.R. Solvason (Canada), M. Mangialajo (Italy), J.W.H. Van Den Bergh

(Netherlands), and P.J. O'Neill (United Kingdom). The committee is open

for additional countries/experts who wish to participate.

3. Discussion of the need for and the means to accomplish development of

a uniform methodology for measuring and reporting the performance of

the various projects related to MIUS technology underway in the various

countries. A committee titled "Measurement Technology Committee" was

established with the Netherlands in the lead role. The committee

consisted of J.A. Knobbout, (Netherlands), Chairman, M. Simon (France),

H. Klein or G. Richter (Federal Republic of Germany), U. Renghold (Sweden),

and C. W. Phillips (USA). This committee also is open for additional

countries/experts who wish to participate.

G3
4. Brio f reports on on-going projects of interest in the several countries

represented by experts in attendance. Major projects in France, Belgium,

Italy, Federal Republic, of Cermany, United States, United Kingdom, Netherland:

and Sweden were discussed. Related activities in the Commission of the

European Communities was described.

5. Tour of the laboratory facilities of TNO in Apeldoorn including - separation of paper from solid waste; testing of refrigerators and

refrigeration systems; development of standards for defrosting of air

coolers; advanced heat pump technology and combination with solar heat

collection; testing of air heaters recovering latent heat in the exhaust

gas; calorimeters for determination of energy balances; fluidized bed

burners; advanced electron microsopy; testing of mechanical structures

6. The final business action was to accept the French invitation to hold

the next CCMS-MIUS Project meeting at Electricite de France, at Centre

des Renardieres on May 18 and 19, 1976.

G4
Attachment A

BELG IUM:

M. ALLION

E.E.C. Directorate General Energy

200 Rue de la Loi

1049, Brussels, Belgium

H.J. F0NTEN0Y

Prcgramrr.ation de la Politique Scientifique

8, rue de la Science

1040 Bruxelles, Belgium

J.A. MICHEL

Department Thermodynamique UCL

Louvain-La-Neuve , Belgium

ATTENDEES AT CCMS--MIUS PROJECT MEETING

Apeldoorn, The Netherlands

December 9 and 10, 1975

FRANCE :

MICHEL SIMON

Chef division Etudes Generales

Department des Application de

1

1 Electricite , Electricite de France

Les Renardieres BP1 Moret-sur-loing

France 77210

GERMANY :

PETER GORICKE

Rheinisch-Wes tf olisches

Elektrizitaits-Werk, Abt

Anwendungstechnik

43 Essen, Kruppstr 5, Germany

Dipl.Ing. GERHARD RICHTER

Forschungsstelle fur Energiewirtschaf

t

8 Munehen 50

Am Blutenanger 71, Germany

ITALY

HARZ 10 MANG1ALAJ0

CISE- (MILAN)

c.p. 3986 Milan, Italy 20100

G5
NETHERLANDS:

J . A. KNOBBOUT

Centrum voor Energievraagstukken TNO

P. 0. Box 342

Apeldoorn, Netherlands

W. JONGEDIJK

Gasunie

N.V. Ned®rJandse Gasunie

P. 0. Box 19

Groningen, Netherlands

J. SCOTT MONIER- ECON

Hague Embassy of the United States of America

102 Lange Voorhout

The Hague, Netherlands

APO New York 09159

J.DE JONG

Technisch PJivsische Dienst TNO-TH

Stieltjesweg 1

P. 0. Box 155

Delft, Netherlands

J . A. BANCK

Ministerie van Economische Zaken

Bezuidenhoutseweg 30

The Hague, Netherlands

B.A. KLEINBLOESEM

N.V. KEMA

Utrechtseweg 310

Arnhem, Netherlands

P.J. COLLET

Institutuut TNO voor Uerktuigkundige

Construe ties

Leeghwa terstraat 5 P. 0. Box 29

Delft, Netherlands

F.C. VAN BEUKERING

Instituut voor Milieuhygiene en Gezondheidstechnic'k TNO

Schoemarkerstraat 97

?. 0. Box 214

Delft, Netherlands

G6
No the r lands (Continued)

J.W.H. VAN DEN BERGH

Reactor Centrum Nederland

Westerduinweg 3

Petten, Netherlands

W. SMIT

Centrum voor Energievraagstukken TNO

P. 0. Box 342

Apeldoorn, Netherlands

J. QUAKERNAAT

Centrum voor Energievraagstukken TNO

P. 0. Box 342

Apeldoorn, Netherlands

United Kingdom

PETER J* O’NEILL

Directorate of Research Requirements

Department of the Environment

2 Marsham Street, SWI

London , England

United States

C.W. PHILLIPS

Office of Energy Conservation

National Bureau of Standards

Room A146, Bldg. 225

Washington, D. C. 20234

S.N. CAVROS

Chief, Community Systems Branch

Energy Research and Development Administration

20 Massachusetts Avenue NW.

Washington, D. C. 20545

F. A. KARRIS

Special Assistant to the Administrator

Environmental Protection Agency

Room 1025A East Tower A-100

401 M Street SW

Washington, D. C. 20460

G7
United States (Continued)

JEROME H. ROTHENBERG

HUD-MIUS Program Director

Department of Housing and Urban Development

451 7th St. S.W.

Room 8158

Washington, D. C. 20410

CAMERON SANDERS

U. S. CCMS Delegation to NATO

Brussels

Autoroute Brussels —Zaventum

APO New York 09667

Dr. FRANK GOLDNER

U.S. ERDA Office, Brussels

c/o U.S. Mission to the European Communities

40, Blvd du Renge - B3

1000 Brussels, Belgium

APO New York 09667

SWEDEN :

ULF RENGHOLD

Assocation of Swedish Heating and Ventilation Engineers

Hantverkargatan 8

Stockholm, Sweden

G8
CONFIRMATION NOTICE

Committee on Challenges to Modern Society (CCMS)

- Rational Use of Energy CCMS-Modular Integrated Utility Systems (MIL’S)

Meeting: December 9 and 10, 1975 at

Center for the Study of Energy Problems, TNO

Laan Van Uestenenk 501

P.O. Box 342, Apeldoorn - Zuid

The Netherlands

Agenda

Tuesday, December 9, 1975

0900 Call to order and Introductions

Welcome to the Netherlands and TNO

Review of CCMS Activities,

F. Allen Karris, Special Assistant to the Administrator

of EPA for Coordinating CCMS activities

CCMS-KIUS Project Goals, Objectives and Schedule - J. H. Rother

Manager, U.S. HUD-MIUS Program (HUD is the U.S. Departs

of Housing and Urban Development)

Meeting agenda and arrangements

TASK 1: Final Review and Discussion of Glossary of Terms ; .approval for distribution (See Attachment 1)

1215 LUNCH—Courtesy of TNO (Coffee Break at 10:30 am)

1345 TASK 2: Listing of projects by CCMS-MIUS participating ccuntri

Preparation of Project Catalog; Review of draft of

project reporting form (see Attachment 2); Selection

of Task Committee.

TASKS 3

AND 4: Discussion of Standard Methodology for Project Measure

and Reporting; Review of draft summary project reperti

. form (see Attachment 3) ; Selection of committees for

completion of these tasks.

1645 ADJOURN FOR THE DAY

SOCIAL HOUR AND DINNER.

• Wednesday, December 10, 1975

0900 Tour of TNO laboratories

- testing and development of heat pumps, domestic refrigerators

freezer?, etc.

• G9
- development of heat pump with solar collector

- development and testing of air coolers and other unit compose

- gas fired heating units and oil-fired small boilers

- fluidized bed burner under construction

- testing of solar collectors (underway at other locations)

- metal institute; general research, welding research, wear res - mechanical testing of large components

- electron microscopes (number of types, one very special)

•- separation of municipal waste for recycling of paper

- other special facilities

1145 LUNCH (Courtesy of TNO) NOTE: (Coffee Break during Tour)

1300 TASKS 2,

3 and 4: Further discussion (if any) and committee selection

(see page 1)

NATIONAL INTEGRATED UTILITY SYSTEM PROJECTS:

Brief reports of on-going projects in the several countries by

representatives in attendance

OTHER BUSINESS: Determination of date and location of next tee

ADJOURNMENT Not later than 1600 (Coffee Break at 1415)

NOTE: Meeting will be chaired by Clinton W. Phillips, Manager, National

Bureau of Standards’ Team, U.S. HUD-MIUS Project.

Arrangements for housing and local transportation in Apeldoorn should be

made as soon as possible with Mr. J. A. Knobbout, Center for Study of

Energy Problems, TNO, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands, Tel. 055 77 33 44,

Telex No. 49095 TNO AP.
APPENDIX H

MINUTES

OF THE

THIRD MEETING OF THE

COMMITTEE ON THE CHALLENGES OF

MODERN SOCIETY

MODULAR INTEGRATED UTILITY SYSTEMS PROJECT

RATIONAL USE OF ENERGY PILOT STUDY

ON MAY 18-19, 1976

AT

ELECTRICITE DE FRANCE, . MORET-SUR-LOING

FRANCE

HI
FORWARD TO MINUTES

PLEASE NOTE: In addition to the semi-detailed minutes included herein,

there is a set of Summary Minutes available for those who

do not require a detailed account of the meeting.

The detailed account of the third CCMS-MIUS* Project meeting described

herein hopefully will be helpful to the committees in their work as well

as document the results and action items of the meeting. The minutes as written are not a word by word transcription of the tapes. In many cases,

however, the minutes are very detailed. I believe that the most important

points are highlighted and that the minutes are reasonably accurate. In

view of the difficulty of understanding voices from a tape, particularly

from a distance and when extraneous noises block out or distort some words,

there may be some statements misinterpreted or misunderstood. Some

statements may be missing that those who made them felt important. I may also have incorrectly identified persons making statements. I apologize

for any material which may have inadvertently been omitted, or interpreted

or stated incorrectly.

Morris Nimmo - Editor

*CCMS-MIUS is

Integrated

Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society - Modular

Utility Systems

H2
MINUTES OF THE THIRD CCMS-MIUS PROJECT MEETING

May 18-19, 1976

The third meeting of the CCMS-MIUS Project was called to order at 9:00 am May 18, 1976 by Mr. Clinton W. Phillips, Project Chairman at Electricite

de France (EDF) at Moret-sur-Loing , France.

The following countries attended:

Austria (P.V.Gilli)

Belgium (R.Genin, J. Michel)

France (M. Simon, Host, T. Grjebine, H. Michel, A.Pfohl, J.Zyss)

Germany (W.Piller)

Italy (M.Mangialajo)

Netherlands (J.Van den Bergh, J.Knobbout)

Sweden (U.Rengholt) Harris* U.S.A. (J. Rothenberg, S.Cavros, F. *, M.Nimmo, C. Phillips)

Also in attendance were:

C. Sanders - CCMS Officer, U.S. and J.Sampas - CCMS Projects Office,

NATO Brussels

CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTIONS

Mr. Phillips welcomed those in attendance and explained the concept of

Integrated Utility Systems and their productive application. He made

several announcements concerning the purpose and arrangements for the

meeting, the tour of the EDF laboratories, and the host's invitation to

a dinner for those in attendance

WELCOME TO ELECTRICITE DE FRANCE

Mr. Phillips introduced Mr. Henri Michel, Chief Department of Applications

de 1' Electricite, EDF who welcomed the attendees to EDF. He explained that

their main concern is centralized power stations; however, they are also

interested in the idea of modular integrated systems and work being conducted

on modular integrated utility systems.

*Address - Mr. F. Harris, u.S. CCMS Coordinator, Environmental

Protection Agency, Room 1025A, East Tower A-110, 401 M Street SW,

Washington, D. C. 20460

H3
Mr. Michel Simon, the meeting host, distributed several booklets describing

EDF and the work being conducted there. Mr. Simon explained the dinner

arrangements and discussed briefly the tour and the present EDF facilities.

EDF has the biggest high voltage testing laboratory in the world as far as size is concerned. The second biggest is located in Montreal. EDF tests

heat exchangers, high voltage lines, circuit breakers, high power apparatus,

etc. They also have laboratories dealing with mechanical properties,

corrosion, wastewater resources and computers.

Mr. Phillips expressed his and the Committee's appreciation to EDF and

Mr. Simon for hosting the meeting. He asked the other committee members

to consider the possibility that one of them could host the next meeting.

Mr. Phillips explained that there will be two speakers on the general

subject of CCMS and the CCMS-MIUS Project. The CCMS-MIUS Project has a definite time target for completion, which will be addressed. The CCMS-MIUS

project will probably involve not more than two more meetings and we should

be aware of the targets for completing the CCMS-MIUS Project.

We have present, Mr. Cameron Sanders, CCMS Officer U.S. in the NATO*

Headquarters and Mr. F. Allen (Tex) Harris, the U.S. Coordinator for

the CCMS-Project in an administrative capacity.

UPDATE OF CCMS ACTIVITIES

Report by Tex Harris - At the last two meetings of CCMS, three new pilot

studies were adopted. The first one lead by Canada is on Nutrition and Health.

This study will deal with the problem of nutritional education, the problem of

eating too much of the wrong foods and too little of the right foods. Many

countries are interested in this problem. Italy is very interested in trying

to change the country's concerns from agriculture to agricultural nutrition.

Under France's leadership we have an interesting new proposal which deat with

remote sensing in the control of the pollution of the seas. This project

will be limited to ground and airborne fixed wing and helicopter platforms

for remote sensing of the marine environment, (not including use of satellites).

These platforms will be used to investigate the question of protection from

waste and oil spills in the sea and to look at the fall out over the sea and

the pollution that comes from the land. These remote sensing techniques

will be used to gain information that can be used in computer models of the

coastal zone in order to manage more efficiently the costal zone. The U.S.

is leading a new project that is relevant to the environmental energy interface

that deals with flue gas and sulf urization systems. It is hoped that within

a year or two a document can be published that would pull together in one book

the operating experience on the test results and economics of as many

systems as can possibly test for oil and for coal.

* North Atlantic Treaty Organization

H4
There are three specific (XMS energy programs: solar energy, geothermal

energy and rational use of energy. The solar energy pilot study, the

heating and cooling of buildings, will hold its annual meeting in Copenhagen

in mid September hosted by Prof. Vagn Korsgaard of the technical university

at Lyngby. The program there will parallel somewhat the work of the Modular

Integrated Utility Systems in developing a data format to report on the performance

of solar heating and cooling units as applied to buildings. This project

will not look at the thermal application. We are looking at the use of

solar components in heating and cooling of buildings including seasonal

storage, heat pumps and every possible type of application which can increase

the efficiency of a solar system. About 22 projects in 7 or 8 countries

will be placed in a data format developed by the project. Presentations on these projects will be made at the Copenhagen meeting and the problems

that people have in using the data format to convey information effectively

will be discussed.

The second part of the solar program deals with the exchange of information.

This is essentially to circulate on a timely basis, published information

regarding solar heating and cooling applications in the original language in

which it was published.

The development of several specialized working groups dealing with particular

problems is being pursued. One working group which is lead by Denmark

is studying the "zero energy"house. The Federal Republic of Germany and

the United Kingdom are participating and the United States and Netherlands

are interested in the study. The "zero energy" house is examining the

development of an efficient experimental housing design incorporating solar

collectors, seasonal storage and systems for capturing waste heat from the

air and waste water.

France is interested in exploring the possibility of a Mediterranean group

to look at the design of experimental prototype houses in this particular

latitude. Also under discussion is a tropical group that would deal with and

design solar houses to maximize heating and cooling of buildings located in

the tropics. Thus, there probably will be three specialized subgroups.

Ten countries have signed a Memorandum of Understanding and are participating

in a formal way in the information exchange program on solar heating and

cooling.

The next CCMS pilot study on energy is geothermal energy. The United States

and Italy CNR have developed a computer based information system which will

collect data on all geothermal reservoirs, wells, and end-purpose uses,

world-wide. The information will be available to all countries who

contributed information.

The next project led by France, deals with non-electrical use of geothermal

resources. This project is focusing at the present time on the economics

of utilizing geothermal energy resources for heating buildings. This project

is also looking at the French work on heat pumps. The Icelanders who have a lot of experience are providing data. Italy has a lot of information and

experience with geothermal resources although not so much on non-electrical

uses. Some new lower temperature findings in Italy quite close to Rome and

other cities makes the application of non-electrical future use of geothermal

resources in Italy imminent. We are looking primarily at the costs of transporting this energy to these cities.

H5
There is a project led by the U.S. dealing with reservoir assessment. This

project deals with computer modeling of reservoirs for maximization and

optimization of the resources and also the effect of the production of the

spent water if pumped back into the reservoir. There is a program in Mexico

in which the U.S. shares a common basin in the Imperial Valley which is

being examined. New Zealand is also participating in terms of the field

project. A five nation team has developed a small geothermal power station

model blueprint. We now hope that this will be built^ perhaps through

joint funding. Italy and Mexico have expressed interest. Turkey has

expressed interest in having a remote well tied into this small power plant.

The last project which is led by the U.S. is tied in with research work

which the U.S. is doing in Los Alamos. This is the use of underground dry

hot rocks. The rocks are factured and the water is inserted. Steam or superheated water is recovered. This project has succeeded in terms of

having two wells and connecting the wells. There is an experimental heat

exchanger at the top. The flow is not as large as we would like so we are examining ways of doing work in granite. We have had engineers from many

countries outside the U.S. working with the U.S. team on rocks.

In the Rational Use of Energy pilot study there is an industrial data base

project which has four parts. The first part is steel which is led by

Italy. Basic data has been gathered for the energy consumed in the process

of making steel. There are still some methodological problems in terms

of the energy content which is given to scrap steel. There is a project

on cement which is now completed. The final report has been approved,

and is now being edited. It should be published within a few weeks in

the U.S. The report has a very detailed analysis of the nature of the

cement making processes from the energy standpoint and also addresses

future energy research and development needed in the process of manufacturing

cement

There is another project dealing with plastics which is led by Italy.

This project is just beginning. We have had one working group on the energy

process data. There is a methodology group which encompasses all of these

data bases and is addressing and developing a common methodology which

allows effective international comparison of energy utilization in each of

the industries.

One project is the aluminum industry and another covers some aspects of

the food processing industry. There will be a meeting in Brussels at the

end of June at which these subjects will be discussed. In terms of food

processing we would like to take one or two types of industries which would

serve as a methodological basis for examining the energy content in the food

industry. The next subproject is electric utility load management.

The next meeting on this project will be held in Brussels in November.

The project on Development of the Test Reference Year which is led

by Denmark has been completed and the final report is being edited at this

time. Four nations have agreed to perform teste on the Test Reference

Year. This is a fitting project for those people dealing with the concern

of weather and with building performance. They are developing a system

on a test basis for extrapolating building performance from one climatic

area to another climatic area.

H6
Participants who wish specific reports that have been completed or are being edited, please transmit your request to Tex Harris. (Refer to Page 1

of these minutes for Mr. Harris' address).

OTHER INTRODUCTIONS

Cameron Sanders as the U.S. CCMS Officer discussed briefly his responsibility,

interests and viewpoints on the CCMS energy activities.

James Sampas, CCMS Projects Officer, NATO, discussed briefly his role in

the CCMS activities.

Mr. Phillips joined Mr. Sanders in welcoming the participation of non-NATO

countries in CCMS Projects. Mr. Phillips stated that Mexico, Spain, and

Sweden had indicated that their participation would be continued through the

remainder of the technical program. In behalf of the committee, Mr. Phillips

expressed the committee's pleasure that non-NATO representatives were present.

He emphasized that the technology goes beyond the NATO role.

The other nature of CCMS is that it definitely programs an effort to fill

a need but with a definite time target to stimulate interests and if there is a continuing interest to identify some mechanism to carry the work on beyond

the role played by the project identification capabilities of CCMS.

UPDATE OF CCMS-MIUS PROJECT ACTIVITIES

Mr. Phillips next introduced Mr. Jerome H. Rothenberg, Program Manager of the

HUD*/MIUS Program, who provided an update of the CCMS-MIUS Project activities

and described its targets and goals (Refer to Attachment 1). Mr. Rothenberg

is also leader of the U.S. delegation which is serving as the lead

country for this project. Mr. Rothenberg expressed his appreciation and

congratulations to Mr. Michel, Mr. Simon and EDF for hosting the meeting

and thanked those attending for their participation.

DATA FORMAT COMMITTEE RESPONSIBILITIES

Mr. Phillips - The purpose of the committee work sessions is to present as many ideas as possible that will aid the committees in their tasks. All are invited to participate whether designated members of the committee or not.

We need to move this project work to a definite point of completion in about one year. We will probably have a fall ('76) meeting and a spring ('77)

meeting. The purpose of the spring meeting should be to conclude and approve

the products of this particular CCMS-MIUS Program. As we see it now, there

are two primary products. One is a catalog which describes on-going projects

that bear a technical relationship to the idea of integrated utility systems

anywhere and certainly within the participating countries. If a project includes

* HUD is Department of Housing and Urban Development

H7
electric power generation, recovery of energy, transmission of energy for

the purpose of providing utilities to a community of buildings and services,

if it treats the wastewater and solid waste problem in such a way that

there are benefits by an integration process with other needs of a community,

then these subsystems are candidates for project identification. The

development of a better boiler would be beyond the scope of the catalog or the development of a better generator or a better solar collector. However,

the application of an improved technology which supplies the energy needs

of a community as well as satisfies the minimum services to a community in an integrated fashion, even though it may only be two of these elements that

are integrated, not necessarily five or six elements, is the thrust of the

project identification. The principal product of the Data Format Committee

is the catalog and in order for that to be a reality we have a great many

questions which have to be answered. How can we best describe each project

in a uniform fashion so we can compare projects with each other? What type

of classification would make it easier to tell where certain kinds of

projects are being conducted? We must know how big the projects are, what

is their time schedule, what is their relative progress to date? To

accomplish this we need the mechanism for that kind of reporting.

Much time will be spent on the detail. First, how do we describe the

project, and second, the important part, how do we incorporate the follow-on

as a part of the catalog for those projects which have moved into some degree of completion. Some projects will be at the point of planning,

others under construction and others completed.

In addition to identifying the project there is a need for a progress

report which will provide a means to compare projects and their results.

The minimum product of the Data Format Committee would be the catalog,

including the progress reports for those projects that are on-going by

Spring 1977.

I believe that the product of this Committee should set an example for

the continuation of the kind of activity that is represented by such a project. CCMS probably will not be the vehicle for the second revision of

the catalog or 3rd or 4th, etc. This committee work will be complete once

we have established the catalog. A mechanism for its continuation by others

under a different procedure will be decided by others.

CCMS-MIUS PROJECT CONTINUATION

Tex Harris - After the project has begun and the functions and tasks have

been established, CCMS will work toward placing it in another international

organization. For example, Mr. Harris stated that we have different models

for this. One of the more recent cases is the pilot study on Road Safety

which had six projects. The Identification of Road Hazards, led by

France, and the Development of an Experimental Safety Vehicle Testing

procedure, led by the U.S., were placed in the International Organization

for Automotive Safety in the OECD after CCMS had completed work to a particular point. The purpose of CCMS is to pilot and begin a project,

see it to a definite product conclusion on a line of activity (usually a two year period) and place it in another committee, international scope,

if there are needs for its continuation. Mr. Harris pointed out that after

the project has been concluded and placed in another organization CCMS will

follow it for about 2 years. Mr. Harris stated that at the next meeting the

H8
question of how the work of the CCMS-MIUS Project can best be continued

should be addressed.

SUMMARY OF PRODUCTS

Mr. Phillips summed up the CCMS role by stating that he believed the CCMSMIUS project product would be the catalog and the establishing of a mechanism

for continuing the catalog and establishing a progress/evaluation reporting

system and standard methodology for collecting and reporting data. The

continuation would be to update the catalog and collect and disseminate

progress/evaluation reports and performance data.

Mr. Phillips next identified the companion task of the catalog as that of

developing guidelines or a handbook that identifies the elements in an integrated utility system that should be addressed when reporting

performance and standard procedures for making these measurements. This will

be discussed in more detail this afternoon by the Measurement Technology

Committee.

K 1 DATA FORMAT COMMITTEE

Catalog Alternatives

Mr. Phillips, Chairman of the Data Format Committee, led a discussion on the questions and proposed decisions on the catalog (Refer to Attachment 2).

Concerning item a, guidelines for the type of projects to be included,

Mr. Phillips extended the idea of keeping the criteria rather broad at

first, i.e., the development of a criteria could best be accomplished after

knowing the degree of response to project Summarv Forms. Also after we progress to the point of having completed Project Summary Forms, the

question of guidelines becomes a little less critical. Mr. Phillips

offered as an example of one organization’s approach to cataloging projects,

the selected printout of energy projects cataloged by ORNL* in the U.S.

(Attachment 3, a typical ORNL project summary).

What should be the cut off or the lower level below which we would not

identify projects? Steve Cavros responding stated that everything and

anything that can be combined and integrated to take advantage of energy

exchange, or recovery of waste heat should be included. A minimum of two

systems would also be an appropriate guideline. Mr. Phillips indicated

that this was the type of guideline he was seeking. He further raised the

following questions.

Should we limit projects to those being conducted by the country itself

or one funded by national funds and should we include those being conducted

by a commercial enterprise from which data could be obtained? Is there any

reason to restrict this from commercial enterprises? C.W. Phillips further

suggested that we not limit any project at this time that meets the basic

idea of integrating one or more subsystems, regardless of sponsorship or size because we might learn a great deal from a small project that also had

all the technical problems with which we must deal. Mr. Grejebine next

asked if district heating systems should be included. He further asked the

* Oak Ridge National Laboratory

H9
meaning of modular. Mr. Phillips replied that district heating systems

should be included and that the word modular means different things to

many people. One of the interpretations that modular has in the U.S. concept

is that integrated systems would grow with the demands of the community that

they serve. For example, if a community grew in segments over a 25 year

period, then the utilities likewise would grow in segments, elements or modules. Also the idea that any two or more subsystems that are integrated

makes an integrated system with two or more modules is another interpretation

C.W. Phillips - Item b. We need a number to identify projects that are

more than a simple sequential number and would show classification types.

We will develop in the next draft a recommendation for an identification

number based on types of projects such that a cross index may be utilized

to aid in locating projects on heat recovery, distribution systems,

incineration systems, etc.

Item c - This item is rather straight forward. Any catalog needs an introduction describing what it is and its purpose and how to use it.

The major topics we believe this front section should include are

listed. The next draft will provide some of this information.

Item d - Concerning the organization of the catalog, it has been established

that we need to classify the kinds of projects in some manner. Thus, we

should likely be considering either item 2 or 3. The question of whether

the catalog will consist of multiple volumes will depend upon some later

decision.

It should take no more than two pages to identify a project, front and

back of one sheet. We will discuss later the contents of the Project

Summary Form, the form that will aid you in deciding whether you would

like to have additional information (Project Progress/Evaluation Report)

from the project engineer.

Item e - Responding to a question, Mr. Phillips explained that random (e.l) no classification, i.e, no regard to type of project, county, size, etc.

Perhaps before a classification system can be designed and accepted, a look at the types and number of projects being reported should be made.

A classification system of course would eliminate any random arrangement

of projects. A more specific breakdown would be, should we classify by

country (e.2) within a different type of project?

The type of utility service (e.3) -is important as well as the type of

community it services such as residential, commercial, light industry,

etc. This particular item is one in which we can use help. Items (e.5,.6,.7

.8, and .9) indicate the further breakdown of the kinds of classification

that can be considered.

H10
Referring to item e.7, Mr. Cavros raised a question by suggesting that

major analytical work be included but not a paper study or calculations,

from a project. Mr. Phillips provided an example in this case, by citing

a particular project collecting data to establish a data base for part

load performance of certain major plant components. Mr. Phillips stated

that a program listing of this data base would be of great interest to

people who are concerned with synthetizing programs and that he believes

the committee understands this idea and will include it in the next write

up. There should be more interest in knowing what kind of tools to use for

establishing feasibility instead of a feasibility study itself.

Mr. J. Michel stated that it would also be interesting to know the kind of

tools used for establishing the feasibility of simulations, etc.

Item f - Type of Graphics, Printing, Binder - Mr. Phillips asked if there

is any reason why the catalog needs to be other than an easily reproduced

form such as looseleaf as opposed to a hardback cover. Since the time frame

for the catalog is tight, a typewritten looseleaf book would permit changes

up to the last minute prior to printing. Mr. Simon replied that he was agreeable to this, others agreed by concensus.

Mr. Phillips asked Mr. Harris how CCMS material was published. Mr. Harris

replied by describing the precedent for CCMS publications.

Publications are open. 200 copies or so are given to the NATO Secretariat

and they are distributed to technical libraries, universities, and to whomever

requests them. The cost of doing the printing is generally picked up by

the lead country. Some of the CCMS publications have been copyrighted.

This committee must address this question. We have generally in the U.S.

put the information which has been gathered into the National Technical

Information Service (NTIS) and in the case of energy information, it has

been put into the ERDA* Energy Data Base as well. In this case, it will

probably be placed in the HUD Data Base also.

In response to a question by Mr. Rothenberg, Mr. Harris replied that the

advantage of a copyright is that it would protect a document from commercial

venture. It could prevent a person from recopying a document possibly

changing it and selling it for a profit.

Mr. Harris agreed to investigate the legal details of publishing a document

within CCMS and will furnish Mr. Phillips the details.

A further discussion arose (among Mr. Van den Bergh, Mr. Grjebine, Mr. Harris

and Mr. Phillips) about obtaining a copyright for the book. Mr. Harris

pointed out that even should CCMS acquire a copyright for a particular document

a limited number of copies could be supplied the representative of each

country who could duplicate it for distribution to experts within their

country with CCMS approval. The copyright for example would protect the

catalog from being published by someone who would take improper credit for

the catalog.

*ERDA is U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration

Hll
Looking at items j, k and 1, Mr. Phillips asked Mr. Harris whether the

catalog should be distributed on the basis of national participation,

for example, an individual in a country would act as the agent and he

would decide whether to give the catalog to a commercial industry. Mr. Harris

replied that present CCMS policy is that CCMS in Brussels will make the

publications available to experts performing research, technical institutes,

universities, engineering firms, etc. upon request. In the case where a book distributor is seeking the catalog for a client, CCMS would simply

tell the book distributor to inform his client that he must make the request

direct to CCMS in Brussels. Mr. Phillips further raised the question

concerning item k, how does the copy read when CCMS advertises or identifies the availability of the catalog in a technical journal, newsletter,

etc.? Would we not have to identify who is eligible for a project catalog?

The placement of the catalog in GPO*, NTIS and the number of copies that

should be printed was discussed. It was agreed that the catalog should be

made available to as many people as are interested in the catalog.

Item 1 - The number of copies of the catalog required was discussed which

can be summarized as follows: Each country will be provided several

initial copies. The expected number of countries receiving copies would be

about 23, 10-15 copies would be provided each country. Thus about 500-1000

copies would be required.

Project Summary Form Review

Mr. Nimmo distributed two working drafts. Proposed Project Summary Form and

proposed Project Progress/Evalution Report forms. Also distributed was a summary of comments received from members of the Data Format Committee and

a revised form reflecting the Secretariat’s interpretation of the comments.

Mr. Phillips discussed briefly the purpose of the Project Summary Form and

the Project Progress/Evaluation Report Form. As the committee reviewed the

Project Summary Form, the following comments were noted:

Box 8

- "Research" may be too restrictive a word. A commercial project,

not research in nature,may be willing to supply data. Change "Purpose of

Research" to "Purpose of Project".

Box 6 - Change "Duration of Research" to "Duration of Investigation". It was pointed out that the instructions on how to complete the form, which is

provided with the March 10,1976 version will be updated and supplied with all

forms sent to participants for completion. Also words in italics, to aid in

describing the desired information will be included in the next revised form.

Mr. Phillips summarized by saying that the next step would be to revise the

Project Summary Form to include all of the comments received from the committee,

transmit it very quickly to the Data Format Committee for review allowing a quick turn around, then upon finalizing, transmit to all participants for completin

the form.

*GP0 is U.S. Government Printing Office

** NTIS is National Technical Information Service, U.S. A.

H12
Project Progress/Evaluation Report Form

Mr. Phillips stated that the Project Progress/Evaluation Report Form requires

a great deal more work and that he would like as many ideas as possible.

If you as an engineer consult the catalog and see a project that interests

you, for example, the Julich thermal storage project, you might determine

that you would like to know more about the project. In this case what

additional information would you like to see in a progress report. That's

what the Project Progress/Evaluation Report format is about. It is not the

format for the final report. Mr. Knobbout's committee will cover that.

Obviously, this report cannot contain all of the engineering data one might

wish to have. Assume that in your organization you have an engineer who can review this report, reporting back to management, and who can assess whether

the project would be worthwhile pursuing and learning more about. This

report would serve to provide enough information for one to understand and

define the project and judge its worth to his organization or himself.

In view of the need for more work on this report form and help from you, the

committee, we will have at least two more iterations of this report form that we will mail to everyone participating in the program. Any comments that

you make now and in the next few weeks will be incorporated into this

document. This report is a very important adjunct to the project catalog.

Mr. Phillips asked Mr. Harris where the progress/evaluation report might fit

into the publication status. Obviously, a project that has not begun or has

only begun would have very little information to provide. Suppose you have

a project that ran for a year or two and you have some data, what is the

publiaation limitation for that kind of data. Mr. Harris responded that

preliminary data would require one to go to a loose-leaf format in order that

it could be updated. Mr. Phillips, as an example, mentioned the preliminary

data from the Jersey City Total Energy Plant which was handed out at the

2nd CCMS-MIUS Project Meeting in Apeldoorn. Mr. Phillips pointed out that

the U.S. has received some very useful criticism on the data. Some have

pointed out errors in the data. It was distributed as preliminary data,

not published data. As a result of this distribution some very valuable

comments have been received and the published data will benefit from this

critique.

Mr. Cavros questioned the check-off part of the report as opposed to narrative

type suggesting that perhaps a narrative would be better and also questioned

the nature of the progress/evaluation report.

Mr. Phillips replied that this was a first pass, an attempt to identify

the kind of information that should be in a report and that we were

trying to arrive at a format that wasn't totally random, the type of

progress reports that would come from many different organizations. The

format shown here doesn't mean that you would have to use this particular

document and check-off each item. It does mean that these are the things

needed to assess the value and nature of a particular project.

Mr. Van den Bergh stated that this format should be limited to the statement

of the function of the requirements of the system and the basic design data.

H13
At this point Mr. Phillips pointed out that should an organization already

have a progress report that includes the information called for in the

Project Progress/Evaluation Report form, that all that would be required

would be for it to submit the progress report. Perhaps the

organization's progress report includes more information than is required.

The main purpose of the CCMS report form is to identify the minimum

requirements to assess a Total Energy or MIUS type project for its value

or use to the inquiring organization and to compare projects. If an organization has a progress report that covers these minimum requirements,

then no additional report or form needs to be prepared or furnished. Of

course, a consistent format from project to project is very helpful from

an inquirer's viewpoint.

Mr. Knobbout's Committee will also explore this same rather sensitive

question this afternoon. Do you dictate to an author on how to write a report? The answer is no. But you do have a right as an engineer to say

that if you write a final report about a project, would you please cover

all these elements and would you tell me about accuracy, the true nature

of the data. He would also like to know where did you get the information,

how good was the instrumentation, etc.? This report form should be a base. We would not want to restrict receiving more information.

Question about publication of Progress Reports - Mr. Phillips addressed Tex

Harris as follows: For example, let's say a progress report was 3 inches

(7.5 cm) thick and 2/3 of it were computer printouts. Suppose the U.S.

as the lead country has said that it will make reports available to anyone

that wants them. The U.S. would need to be very careful in its commitments

until it saw the variety and quantity of information that flows. If the U.S.

agreed to assume the cost of printing or reproducing these reports, it

might elect to drop all the appendices and instruct the inquirer to

write the author for the appendices.

The Project Progress/Evaluation Report will also make the Project Summary

Form more useful. There may be projects that never result in the completion

of a Project Progress/Evaluation Report. However, the Project Summary Form

should indicate the probability that the Project Progress/Evaluation Report

will be available. That is one of the boxes on the form.

Mr. Simon suggested that prior to the next meeting that the Project Progress/

Evaluation Report form be circulated among CCMS-MIUS project participants

for completion or compliance on one of their projects for testing. This

would also permit each participant more time in examining and commenting on

the report form. As Chairman of the Data Format Committee, Mr. Phillips

agreed that he would proceed with this suggestion.

H14
Approval and Circulation of Project Summary Form

A discussion followed concerning the approval and circulation of the

Project Summary Form. There was some concern that the review and completion

of the Project Summary Forms might be delayed due to summer vacations, etc.

(At this point the meeting was adjourned for lunch).

Mr. Phillips reconvened the meeting after lunch and summarized the

Project Summary Form action items.

The immediate task is to get the comments assembled into a draft of the

Project Summary Form. NBS will get the revised draft to each participant

for review. We will give you a reasonable time, 2 to 3 weeks, to provide

us with your comments. If you have no comments, then we will make

multiple copies of it available to each of you and ask that you begin

to complete the form for those projects in your country that you consider

candidates for the catalog. If you can have them completed by the time of our fall meeting we can begin assembling the catalog.

There has been some confusion about the longer form (Project Progress/

Evaluation Report form). It does not have as high a priority time target

as the Project Summary Form describing the projects. Between now and the

time we complete the Committee's work next Spring, we would hope that some

of these projects would have Project Progress/Evaluation Reports. In the

interval between our Fall meeting and our Spring meeting the Data Format

Committee will be concentrating on completing the format and the guidelines

for preparing the Project Progress/Evaluation Reports.

A question arose if the forms have to be written in English. Mr. Phillips

replied that it would be helpful to us as the Secretariat in expediting the

forms, but that they do not have to be completed in English. If they are not

prepared in English we will deal with the necessity for translating as the

problem arises.

Mr. Simon commented on the second page of the draft Project Summary Form. He

recommended changing "plant location" to "project location" and he questioned

the base for heating degree days (18, 19 or 20?) and stated that cooling

degree days (hours above 267°C) should be 25, 26, or 27 not 26.7°C. He

also commented on the other technical data. It was agreed that Mr. Simon

would provide written comments later. Mr. Phillips acknowledged the

difficulty of the technical data.

Mr. Gilli stated that the instruction sheet distributed to the research

workers should have a few sentences telling what CCMS is and what MIUS is.

It should include a short definition and then start with the technicalities.

H15
He also suggested that a time limit be placed on how far back completed

projects are considered, such as 2 years. He also suggested that this

be clarified in the instructions.

In item 12, Mr. Cavros asked what is meant by "data available in a form

applicable"? Mr. Phillips replied that many plants have information in

the records, but nothing for distribution. Will there be documentation

with test data available reflecting the results of their project?

Mr. Rothenberg stated that if there is no data then the Project Summary

Form should not be completed. Mr. Phillips pointed out that defining

data (what constitutes data) is in question. Estimates or design data

could be acceptable.

In item 13, Mr. J. Michel recommended that we specify the mean expected

heat power ratio for total energy systems on which an estimate has been

made, peak and average.

Mr. Zyss recommended that the source of energy used, coal or gas be included

in the technical data. Also suggested was the payback period. Mr. Van

den Bergh indicated that he had sent comments in the form of a revised form.

Mr. Phillips concluded the Data Format Committee meeting by thanking the

participants and briefly summarizing the action items (Refer to

previous portion of minutes).

TASK 2 MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

Mr. Phillips introduced Mr. J.A.Knobbout of the Netherlands, and

Chairman of the Measurement Technology Committee. Mr. Rnobbout explained

the scope and goals of this activity.

He distributed a draft of a measurement technology chart which described

the reporting requirements (Refer to Attachment 4). He stated that it is

the first draft and that he wishes inputs from the group with the hope of

improving the document. What do we want to know? The approach will be to

arrive at a document which will guide project investigators in preparing

their final report in order that sufficient data is provided for

comparing projects and evaluting results.

Referring to the Introduction, Mr. Knobbout read through items 1-5 outlining

the measurement technology phasing. We are trying to follow the systems

approach looking at MIUS as a whole system, what’s coming in, and what’s

going out of it, then observing the interactions of the subsystems. Referring

to Figure 2, Mr. Knobbout went through the inputs and outputs. He next

described Figure 1 a more detailed diagram (abstracted MIUS) explaining

that the interconnecting lines are whatever the actual output - input might

be. In the case of the incinerator some fuel may be necessary to ignite the

solid waste and to keep it burning, etc. This is now shown in Figure 1. It was pointed out that one of the inputs on the left side of the diagram could

be electricity for a MIUS that was a grid connected system. Mr. Gilli made

a point that one input could be solar energy. Mr. Mangialiajo made a point about noise being an input, that it should be measured. Mr. Phillips

then described the noise experience the U.S. has had with the Jersey City

H16
Total Energy plant. Mr. Pillar pointed out the difficulty they have had in

Germany measuring noise. There was agreement that regardless, noise has to

be measured. Mr. Van den Bergh pointed out the necessity of including

engine vibration as well as noise.

There were questions concerning the incinerator output. It can be steam,

hot water (completely open). There was a question as to whether we actually

anticipate an incinerator in MIUS as opposed to pyrolysis or methane gas.

Mr. Phillips replied that the incinerators are generic and that pyrolysis

or methane gas could be possible in a more sophisticated system. There

was a question of whether MIUS was limited to present technology or whether we go with a system of future technology (solar, etc.). A

discussion ensued on the question of whether or not instrumentation should

stay within the boundary of known systems and their performance. Mr. Rothenberg

pointed out that HUD has been very careful not to apply anything to the

public sector which is not completely reliable and available off the shelf

(tried and tested hardware).

Mr. Zyss asked if the diagram is an actual system and does it include

everything. Mr. Knobbout replied that it is only hypothetical and that

the diagram hopefully would include most cases. There are so many schemes

and possibilities that it is difficult to cover all in this type of

document. It should be what we should measure and in what way. Mr. Rothenberg

pointed out the diagram is a typical conventional MIUS.

Mr. Zyss pointed out that we should possibly add heat storage ancj heat

extraction such as by heat pumps.

Mr. Phillips then raised the question, where does the utility system stop

and the end-use begin. Are we talking about things inside of the building

that use these utilities? For example, take a typical building to be tied

into MIUS with a fired-boiler and electricity for mechanical cooling - there clearly must be some conversion device in place of the boiler. When

bringing in chilled water for cooling versus electrical cooling you have

actually affected what is inside the building. The MIUS "black box" may

depict the point of conversion. Perhaps you have a heat exchanger instead

of a boiler. Buildings already in existence may not be a candidate for tie-in

with a MIUS because extensive equipment conversion or retrofit might be

necessary. Mr. Cavros raised the question that instrumenting the end-user

or building for load monitoring might be a difficult problem.

Mr. Rothenberg pointed out that the degree to which one instruments the

supply to the load and the return from the load depends on the particular

application and what you call a load, its configuration and at what point

is the delivery. If you have a large distribution system you would probably

measure outside each building. The distribution losses would be considered

part of the load. You also might have to reconsider where you instrument,

and what you penalize with the losses the MIUS or the building.

H17
Mr. Phillips stated that part of the purpose of the committee's work is to

look at those systems which will lend themselves to research feedback. A

commercial application of a MIUS would be interested in different measurements,

etc

Mr. Rothenberg pointed out that we are trying to avoid extrapolations and

certain assumptions when comparing systems. We need systematized comparison

rather than customized information.

Mr. Phillips stated that if one is concerned about the economics of a TE

plant then the annual seasonal efficiency should be at least 65 percent. If one plant has an annual seasonal efficiency of 40 percent and another 70 percent

then one would want to know what the components are doing and what is

different. Component efficiencies etc. can make considerable difference.

Annual seasonal efficiency is the ratio of usable (delivered) energy out

to the point of use to total energy into the system over the period of

a year.

A prime mover may be low in electrical efficiency and high in waste heat

recovery. For example a turbine produces a relatively low electrical

efficiency and a high waste heat recovery potential when compared with a diesel. Also important in the choice of a prime mover would be whether

your load demanded a high thermal output and a relatively low electrical

output or vice versa.

A discussion followed on the effect of the building efficiencies, and the

line losses when distributing chilled and hot water (in the case of a MIUS)

as opposed to distributing air in the case of a conventional system.

Losses may be different.

Mr. Cavros stated that in designing a system you have to optimize, but for

the purposes of instrumentation you must take a physical plant which someone

has designed and determine how you will instrument it. Mr. Rothenberg

said that from the practical point of view in the U.S. it is characteristic

to predict an optimum building system designed for the private sector in

comparison with a maximum efficiency MIUS. Our approach for a building

system will be controlled by traditional thinking unless the building

owner hires a planner knowledgeable enough to consider future systems.

For 90 percent of construction you have to design a system that will fit the

traditional concept of a building design.

A discussion followed with Mr. Simon and Mr. Zyss pointing out the necessity

of considering the efficiency of the housing units and the impact the users have on performance when comparing MIUS's. Because of these impacts

Mr. Knobbout and Mr. Cavros felt that it was a matter of appropriate

instrumenting of the energy flow into the housing units whether by steam,

hot water, chilled water, electricity, etc.
Mr. Knobbout continued his discussion of Figure 1 (Attachment 4) describing

each subsystem and its relationship to the overall system. Also refer to

"Description Subsystem" Page 3 of Attachment 4. During the presentation on item 8, air cooler/cooling tower, Mr. Phillips pointed out that the New

Jersey Total Energy Plant has an emergency heat dump, which is part of the

primary hot water loop (part of primary subsystem) . Should the air coolers

and/or cooling tower fail, hot water is discharged to a drain through a heat

exchanger which extracts the heat. This should be considered. Mr. Knobbout

asked if an aerobic wastewater treatment should be left in and Mr. Phillips

replied that it should as the potential is available with MIUS.

Mr. Knobbout stated that drying, burning, and use of effluent was not

considered in his description of sewage/waste water treatment. Mr. Rothenberg

suggested that the use of effluent be included under the functions as it

could be used for lawn sprinkling and in case of fire. Mr. Knobbout added

an ANNEXE (Appendix) for consideration by the committee on the type of

measurements to be made and accuracy of specific measurements. During this

presentation the following comments were noted: Mr. Rothenberg suggested

including the lubrication oil temperature. Mr. Phillips pointed out

that there possibly should be two circuits, one for the water jacket and

another for the muffler. Mr. J. Michel suggested that the PCI (heat

value) of the fuel be measured in addition to the flow and temperature

in and out. Mr. Van den Bergh asked if the electricity out was the

net power of the prime mover. Mr. Knobbout replied that it was the net

power out of the generator. Mr. Piller suggested an analysis of the exhaust

gases as there is CO being discharged.

In response to a question by Mr. Van den Bergh about where do you intend to

measure the power out. Mr. Phillips stated that you must measure power out

of the generator and/or, preferably both, the parasitic losses and useful

output to the load. Under generator performance, Mr. Knobbout pointed out

that we are not measuring mechanical energy out of the prime mover, but

electricity out of the generator.

A discussion followed on the measurement of mechanical energy, heat, etc.

from heat pumps. Mr. Phillips pointed out the difficulty of measuring

shaft power from a prime mover delivering shaft power to a heat pump , etc.

Usually machine efficiencies are accepted.

Mr. Knobbout moved on to the heating system discussion. Page 6 of Attachment 4.

Mr. Van den Bergh pointed out, under "performance", that since it is agreed

that it is difficult to measure mechanical shaft power can you use "fuel

used" to produce mechanical power? Mr. Knobbout pointed out the fact that

the measurement as identified is theoretical and crucial and should be

dealt with as practically as possible.

Mr. Knobbout proceeded to discuss hot water production, boilers, artificial

coolers, chillers and wastewater and sewage. Mr. Phillips pointed out, that

in the case of the wastewater sewage, some systems may use heat in and this

should be measured.

H19
There were several comments on various known experiments where there Is

heat input. Mr. Piller indicated that Dr. Shaefer would probably have

some experiences to share with the measurement technology task regarding

wastewater and sewage processing.

Next Mr. Knobbout proceeded to incinerator performance, pointing out the

uncertainty of measuring solid waste composition as it is constantly

changing. He felt that one would need to know about the composition.

Sampling in this case would seem important. Mr. Phillips pointed out

that the U.S. is looking at using a calorimeter to measure heat value

of solid waste at intervals (burned in sealed container and measured).

Mr. Knobbout proceeded with the Interface from the complex to the MIUS (the

last item listed in Attachment 4 for measurements) and thus completed his

overview of what he believed were the required measurements.

He then asked the committee to comment on the following questions?

a) Are these measurements as outlined difficult or not difficult to take?

b) Is this approach realistic?

c) Is this the way we should go to get the best performance data?

d) Should we approach the question of measurement technology for

MIUS differently?

e) In what way should we proceed?

Mr. Piller pointed out that there will be difficulty in finding projects

that have the means to instrument a plant to the degree outlined. Mr. Cavros

stated that these measurement requirements presented could be considered

guidelines for pilot plants.

Mr. Phillips commented that the requirements being discussed would lend

themselves to research projects rather than commercial plants or facilities.

Mr. Cavros stated that we should also consider the minimum measurements

that an operating plant should conduct.

Mr. Phillips pointed out the necessity of many measurements by giving an example at the New Jersey Total Energy Plant (NJTE) . It was discovered that

about 35% of the recovered waste heat from the engines was being lost due to

a malfunctioning heat exchanger. The extensive instrumentation made it

possible to diagnose and correct the problem.

Mr. Rothenberg affirmed the idea of minimum instrumentation versus full

instrumentation indicating that the determining factor would be the purpose

or need for instrumentation? Are you conducting a full research plant or operating a commercial venture in which you must perform some minimum checks?

H20
Mr. Phillips pointed out that the extensive part of instrumenting a plant

is the data collection system which, when automated, can be tied into a computer to take periodic readings and store the data for instant recall.

The sensors are considerably less expensive and are the same instruments

from which an operator might manually acquire readings. The sensors need

not be any more accurate for the simple system as opposed to the sophisticated

one.

One of the things that should also be addressed in the measurement

requirements is how do you take the data? Do you have a technician with

a clip board recording readings at intervals or do you have an automated

system recording readings at frequent intervals?

Mr. Van den Bergh pointed out the importance of calling attention to the

location of instruments in the measurement requirements. Instruments used

in the operating process could be located such that they could serve a dual role, both for process and for experimentation.

In conjunction with this idea Mr. Phillips pointed out that NASA in the

U.S., one of the U.S. agencies in the HUD-MIUS Program, has a strong

feeling that process control should be upgraded and experimental

control reduced and that both should be served by the same sensors

integrating the process control with that of experimental control.

Mr. Van den Bergh also pointed out that experimental control could be

important and of interest to the operators and to the owners. Mr. Phillips

added that at the NJTE plant data showed a situation where the boilers were operating when they shouldn’t have been operating; investigation showed that

the temperature controls were set such that the operation of the dry

cooler emergency dump and the minimum temperature of the water loop were

not coordinated with each other. Thus the dry cooler would come on and

then the boiler would come on to satisfy the temperature control demand.

Why was the boiler on when the dry cooler was on? This further raises the

question, what do you do with data when you have it. How do you analyze

it and use it, in order to prevent the plant from becoming counterproductive particularly where you have integrated systems?

Mr. Cavros stated that the minimum requirements could require extensive

study and wondered if there was any experience with the HUD-MIUS on this

subject. Mr. Phillips then identified a forthcoming report on the MIST

(a test bed at NASA for the MIUS which can be used to produce insights

to MIUS performance and instrumentation)

Mr. Simon pointed out that so far as the measurement requirements stated in

Mr. Knobbout ' s paper are concerned, he knows of no plant in France or Europe

that could provide all of the measurements. He suggests that for these plants

that performance be based on a scaled down version of Mr. Knobbout ’s paper

such that essentially fuel-in, power-out and thermal energy out over a period

of time (such as a year) would be used. Mr. Phillips replied that he believed

once the project begins to comply with the measurement requirements guidelines

that more data could be supplied than one might believe at this time.

H21
A discussion followed on the importance of two levels of measurement, a level

of measurement which is practical to evaluate an operating plant and another

level of measurement for a detailed evaluation. If one builds a plant on

the basis of a feasibility study, then once the plant has been built and is

operating there must be measurements to test, confirm, or justify the

feasibility studies. These measurements would be the minimum level of

measurements. Maybe what is needed is two columns, one for minimum

operating measurements and another for minimum research or experimental

measurements. A short discussion by Mr. Simon, Mr. Van den Bergh, Mr. Cavros,

Mr. Knobbout, and Mr. Phillips followed on the method of determining fuelinput (deliveries, metering, etc.).

Mr. Knobbout at this point summarized the discussion concerning two levels

of requirements. Mr. Simon then stated that the aim is, first of all, to

get data, then make the comparison.

Mr. Phillips stated that in view of the discussion the question is what are

the minimum things that can be measured without which you cannot compare one system with another and what are the techniques for doing that in terms of

the least expensive.

Another thing, one should look at the trend as one tries to combine a more sophisticated operating control system with the kinds of instruments

that would also satisfy an analysis system.

Mr. Rothenberg asked, how do you (Mr. Simon and others in Europe who must measure fuel) certify bulk delivery data? For example, you need the amount

of fuel flowing, how much is consumed, its temperature and BTU value.

The amount of bulk deliveries must be compared and confirmed with the

actual fuel flowing from the day tanks (usually by metering). Mr. Simon

agreed with Mr. Rothenberg but said that plants in France do not presently

have means to accomplish fuel measurements and are not operating in such

a manner. Mr. Rothenberg then aaid that this may be the case, aside from

the HUD-MIUS, but if we want data then fuel measurements must as a minimum

be conducted.

Mr. Simon replied that he does not believe all metering as described could

be afforded by those plants in Europe. Mr. Simon then characterized fuel

measurement in European plants. He was of the opinion that the plants,

however, do know their fuel inputs without the extensive metering Mr. Rothenberg

was describing.

Mr. Grjebine presented an example by stating that they have one set of data

which is at the producing center and another set of data from the user. (Output

from one and the input from another). When dealing with figures that are

just rough energy figures there is insufficient data. He further discussed

the difficulty that would exist in comparing different European systems

without sufficient data, geographical data and the importance of user parameters

H22
Mr. Harris then described a computer model associated with another CCMS

project, the transmission of heat through water systems. A computer model

is being developed at Battelle Northwestern that is applicable to

district heating. The computer has some district heating data collected

and stored. Data is being collected from 4 plants, data from the U.S. and

Iceland. Mr. Harris at this point offered to have a paper delivered to the

CCMS-MIUS Project Committee if they so chose. The chairman requested

that he do so.

Mr. Grjebine discussed briefly the importance of the economic feasibility

study having sufficient data and being conducted with consideration for all

influencing factors. Economic studies may fall short of this. Inflation,

discount rates, etc. can possibly over drive the performance data.

The Chairman closed the meeting at 5:00 pm

SECOND DAY, May 19, 1976

The meeting was reconvened May 19, 1976 at 9:25 am by the Chairman, who

changed the agenda slightly, by distributing the May 19, 1976 Glossary of

Special Terms unique to MIUS in English, French, and German. Mr. Phillips

assured the committee that changes can be made if errors are present,

and Mr. Harris will advise the Project Chairman what is the mechanism for

publishing the Glossary, as it is viewed a potential CCMS publication.

No additional action was required, the Glossary having been approved at the

last CCMS-MIUS Project meeting.

The next item of business was the report of the Data Format Committee and

the Measurement Technology Committee.

Report of the Data Format Committee

Mr. Phillips as Chairman of the Data Format Committee summarized the previous day's

activities concerning the Project Summary Catalog and placed a tentative

schedule on the blackboard for overall committee consideration, as follows:

Revised Summary Form

Out for Review

Comments received and coordinated

Final Form Distributed to Participants

Participants to review and complete

forms for their projects and send to

U.S. (Secretariat)

Secretariat to Prepare Final Forms

Assemble Catalog

Final Catalog approved for distribution

June 1976

July 1976

August 1976

Sept. -Dec. 1976

January 1977

Feb. - March, 1977

April - May 1977

H23
'ITie U.S. will prepare and distribute the revised summary form. During

August we will send out to you working copies so that you can distribute

to your research workers as you see feasible.

Early February we will coordinate, translate and assemble a catalog in

draft form and get it to you in time that you can review it prior to the

meeting time to be set in April or May 1977 (time to be set at the

December CCMS-MIUS Project Meeting). At that time we hope to get the

group's approval of the catalog in a form that could subsequently be

printed and distributed.

In parallel we will continue to redefine with your help a recommended format

for the Project Progress/Evaluation Reports to go with the catalog and

hopefully would have this recommended format and guidelines in your hands

at the time the catalog is completed. The mechanism for collecting and

disseminating these reports should be decided at the December 1976 meeting.

Also we must decide how one would use the reports and who would collect

them. In that same time frame we will be looking for an organization to

carry-on any follow-on activity necessary for the project catalog in the

next few years. The Project Progress/Evaluation Report would not impact

on the project catalog and would simply augment the project catalog.

In order to identify these dates and each step and the rationale for each

step a complete set of minutes will be provided to our CCMS-MIUS projects'

mailing list. Distribution of the minutes will be to the participants

and to those who have identified interest in the CCMS-MIUS project (about

114 individuals from 23 countries).

Mr. Knobbout then provided the schedule for the Measurement Technology

Committee's work.

Mr. Phillips agreed to coordinate with Mr. Knobbout on an updated mailing

list (names of participants).

In response to a question by Mr. Harris, Mr. Knobbout replied that there

would be two levels (minimum and maximum package) of measurements defined,

as had been discussed the previous day.

Mr. Mangialajo asked would it be possible to discuss the Jersey City

Total Energy plant at the next CCMS-MIUS Project meeting in some depth.

Mr. Rothenberg replied that it could be done and the Chairman was requested

to schedule a presentation.

Prepare Second Draft

Distribute Second Draft to

June 1976

July-Aug., 1976

Participants

Comments Rec'd and Revised Draft Comp'd

Final Revised Work

Final Draft Approved

Nov. -Dec., 1976

Jan. 1977

April - May 1977

H24
Mr. Simon, in regard to the Measurement Technology Committee's task of

developing a standard methodology for measuring the performance of a MIUS

,

suggested that a task force from the European members be formed to work on the tasks between CCMS-MIUS project meetings. This met with approval of

those in attendance.

Moving on to the next agenda item, Mr. Phillips asked if there were any new

project tasks that the committee should address? Mr. Harris, referring

to the agenda item concerned with research needs, suggested that the group

consider the research and development areas which are important to the

continuation and development of a MIUS. The committee should tell the

CCMS how this area should be pursued either by the various governments or corporations. The Chairman said that he would consider setting-up a task

group, preferably with European leadership to coordinate the European

interests. There were no additional tasks recommended.

Mr. Phillips then asked for help in recommending effective dates and

places for the fall meeting. Mr. Phillips replied that the U.S. would

like very much to hold the next meeting in the U.S. but would not like

to propose a location that would jeopardize any one's attendance. The

committee responded that to hold the meeting in the U.S. (mostly European

attendees) would pose a problem due to the cost. Mr. Harris stated that

the meeting could always return to Brussels if necessary.

Mr. Phillips stated that Dr. Klein had previously indicated FRG's willingness

to host a future meeting at an appropriate time and asked the attendees if

that would be a suitable meeting place. The reply was affirmative. Mr. Phillips

then asked if Great Britain would be an acceptable alternate location for

the meeting? The reply was affirmative. Then Mr. Phillips stated that he

would pursue with Dr. Klein and Mr. O'Neil, if necessary, these possibilities.

Mr. Rothenberg suggested that Brussels be kept open as a third alternative

if either Germany or Great Britain could not host the meeting. Mr. Phillips

discussed the meeting date, and it was agreed that November 30 to December 2 1976 would be the first choice and December 7 to 9, 1976 would be the 2nd

choice. The Netherlands representatives also stated that the next meeting

could be held there.

Mr. Van den Bergh and Mr. Gilli then amplified a point which also was made

the previous day, that there should be a short description of a MIUS in

front of the documents (Catalog and Project Progress/Evaluation Report) to

be filled-in to help experts, participants and those completing the forms

understand what CCMS-MIUS and the project are, and their purpose.

Mr. Gilli further stated that he had given written comments to the Chairman

including this and other information and recommended that they be included. _

H25
Mr. Rothenberg stated that Mr. Phillips and Mr. Nimmo had prepared two

guidance documents which actually cover the points made by Mr. Van den Bergh

and Mr. Gilli. As a result, Mr. Phillips and Mr. Harris agreed that these

two documents could be handed out as privileged information to the

participants. Mr. Phillips pointed out that these two documents were written

from the U.S. Role and Secretariat viewpoint to guide the U.S. in their

responsibility.

Mr. Phillips then stated that minutes of this meeting will be sent out and

will contain a confirmation of the date and place of the next meeting.

PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS

The Chairman stated that at this time one of the most useful exercises of our meetings has been the opportunity to hear from each of the participants

some comment on projects in their current state of activities that they feel are of interest to the MIUS project group. The discussions started

around the table (limit to 5 to 10 minutes).

U.S. (Mr. Rothenberg - HUD)

The current activity in HUD with NBS support is the HUD-MIUS Program. Also

supporting HUD are other agencies such as ERDA, Oak Ridge National Laboratory,

now part of ERDA, NASA, HEW, etc.

The HUD-MIUS Program is basically a 3 phase program. Phase I is Technology

Development; Phase II, MIUS Demonstration and Evaluation; and Phase III

Technology Transfer.

Phase I should be completed this year with the preparation of the final

documentation about 10-15 additional publications. We have prepared a list

of HUD-MIUS publications including abstracts. We will provide you with a copy. (Copies were passed around to attendees). We will endeavor to provide

copies of these documents upon request as they are available. Please give

your request to Mr. Phillips.

Mr. Rothenberg displayed several HUD-MIUS publications. One pertained to

the development of candidate concepts, several on the coal-fired MIUS concept

which is being sponsored jointly by HUD and ERDA, another on water supply

and treatment, and another on a closed-cycled turbine associated with the

coal-fired MIUS concept.

The HUD-MIUS Program is trying to address most of the concerns of Technology

Assessment, not only what the technology is, but what the long term impact

will be. It will be more than an impact statement on the country and energy

use. We will be receiving more model studies from Oak Ridge and NASA on

actual communities. NBS is responsible for the performance specification,

which is the basis of the MIUS performance, and against which it will be

evaluated

Two documents were prepared on the CCMS-MIUS, one describing the U.S. role in

the CCMS-MIUS and the other role of CCMS-MIUS as viewed by the CCMS-MIUS

Secretariat (Copies of these two documents were provided to attendees earlier)

H26
Mr. Rothenberg described the status of the T.E. Project at Jersey City,

New Jersey. The hook-up of the buildings (instrumentation sensors, etc.)

has been completed. Data has been collected over the past several months.

The month of April showed a savings of about 13-14K gallons of fuel.

Typical data from the plant reveals about 25-35 percent savings of fuel

as compared with typical conventional system. If you will recall, a data

package of the New Jersey TE data was made available at the last meeting.

Data acquisition and processing has generally been excellent except for

several critical areas such as fuel measurements. In the case of fuel

measurements, new instrumentation is being installed to improve the

accuracy of measurements.

The start of a grid-connected total energy study is underway with a contract

to be signed with the San Diego Gas and Electric Company which supplies

an industrial community. Help in planning this study was received from

Commonwealth Edison of Chicago and the Edison Electric Institute.

On April 8, HUD issued a grant to the Interstate Land Development Corp.

to prepare the preliminary design concept and costing for a MIUS Demonstration

plant at St. Charles, Md. (copies of several newspaper clippings were made

available to attendees). The MIUS Demonstration plant will be designed,

constructed and operated by the developer. HUD with NBS support will

instrument, acquire data, and evaluate the plant. The objectives of the

demonstration are to: demonstrate the technical performance of the MIUS,

the public benefits involved, the viability of private sector ownership and

operation of a MIUS, and to provide a data base for the evaluation and analysis

of MIUS. This particular MIUS is dedicated to serving a portion of a new

town at St. Charles, Maryland, near Washington, D. C.

Mr. Rothenberg showed a set of slides on the new community at St. Charles,

site of the HUD-MIUS Demonstration plant. The new community of about 8000 acres

is located in a beautifully wooded area of virgin forest, 25 miles from

Washington, D. C. The MIUS will be built to serve one of the villages consisting

of about 800 dwelling units on a tract of land about 130 acres in size.

The units served by the MIUS will include: high, middle and low-rise

apartments; garden apartments, a village shopping center, a school, a medical

building, senior citizen dwelling units and recreation facilities such as a golf course, swimming pools and tennis courts. There will be several villages

in St. Charles; the MIUS will serve one of them. The MIUS will be located

adjacent to the shopping center or in a wooded area nearby.

Sweden (Mr. Renghold)

Scandinavia as yet does not have so many applications for a MIUS. There are some questions about the work (concerning integration) especially the

situations common to Scandinavia. Sweden has MIUS systems that are very

open ("not rigidly defined" - editors interpretation) and that are being

developed more and more in relation to big district heating systems connected

to or combined with big power stations. These stations are usually 100-600

Megawatts and fueled by oil. There are no nuclear plants at present. These

stations may be considered as some type of MIUS, not the closed MIUS as we know it (Sweden's plants are not strictly MIUS, but together could be viewed

as approaching the MIUS concept - editors interpretation) . They^ contain some of

the MIUS combinations such as heating, water heating, wastewater and solid

waste processing, and power generation. The question is can you combine all

of these systems and turn them into a MIUS?

H27
Mr. Phillips replied that the MIUS system is a totally open system, and that

no size limits have been placed on the concept. Generally the restriction

is the economics of the integration. Mr. Phillips could see no reason why

20,000 homes could not be served by a MIUS. In the U.S. there are some who

believe there should be a MIUS in every home. A MIUS is not restricted to

a new town, old town or the suburbs. It can be an area surrounded by many

communities. A grid-connected MIUS (several MIUS's connected together, and

they in turn connected to the commercial grid) can reduce the need for

redundant spare engines thus reducing the initial capital investment of

a MIUS. Mr. Phillips indicated that the U.S. viewed Europe and Scandinavia

as having already utilized the MIUS concept. In the HUD-MIUS visit to

Europe, 1974, we found the MIUS concept in practice.

Mr. Renghold further explained that power and district heating stations in

Sweden are usually locally owned but have not been moved into the MIUS

concept. However, it appears that it is convenient and possible to do so.

Austria ( Mr. Gilli)

Mr. Gilli provided to each attendee a copy of a list of projects in Austria

related to MIUS. (Refer to Enclosure 5). The ones listed were modular

in nature rather than projects where utilities were being integrated.

Mr. Gilli pointed out that he would not discuss the modular projects, but

would discuss the plans underway for integrated utilities. Austria is

much in the same situation as Sweden except Austrian plants are much

smaller, about 10-100 megawatts generating capacity. To some extent the

idea of having a large network was begun several years ago and discontinued

in 1970. Now there is renewed thought of starting the network again. Plants

started in the 1950's and 1960's largely provided electric power and

heating by steam.

There are some utilities which process solid waste, several of which incinerate

the trash and produce steam for power generation heat. These would fall under

the broad definition of MIUS. In the late 60'

these installations were

successful on a large scale in cities, but were less successful in small

villages and towns. These towns believed it cheaper to simply dispose of

their solid waste. There are about 10-15 plants in Austria on a municipal

scale.

Austria has one nuclear power plant coming on-line in one year and another

to be ordered. Waste heat will be recovered for heating purposes.

The Netherlands (Mr. Knobbout)

Mr. Knobbout distributed to each attendee a copy of a performance summary

of a total energy installation in the Netherlands (Refer to Enclosure 6).

The summary provided an overview of one of the several total energy plants

in the Netherlands. This particular one has been instrumented in order to

acquire and evaluate its data. The data for 1975 demonstrated that the

plant efficiency, electrical efficiency, and engine efficiency have

improved since 1974. The load factor for 1974 and 1975 were about the same. The economic calculations showed a substantial increase in savings from

H28
1974 to 1975. The savings increased by a factor of 2.1 to 1. The

expectations appear good for continued improvement. Based upon the

data taken thus far a total energy plant looks very good

Italy (Mr. Mangialajo)

Mr. Mangialajo accounted for three experiences with total energy in

Italy, the Quartiere COMASINA in Milan, Telenscaldamento in Brescia,

and the FIAT experiment. The first one was a thermo-electric power plant

designed by the "istitutio Antonomo per le Case Popolari" for a housing

development of 12,000 inhabitants in the District of Comasina. In

1968 the system which was based on heavy fuel oil was dismantled for

economic reasons.

This installation was to be able to generate electricity utilizing

the steam enthalpy drop resulting from the pressure differences between

the boilers and the heat exchangers serving the district heating system;

and the boilers and condenser discharge (serving the power plant).

In order to enable evaluation of the power generation linked with central

heating plant and to compile cost data usable for future urban applications,

A.E.M. (the utility company) assumed financial and managerial

responsibilities of the heating plant by receiving electric energy produced

from November 1st to March 31st amounting to 18,500 KW. This represents

approximately 40-50 million KWH annually.

In 1958 A.E.M. contributed to the Institute 6.90 lira per KWH. (This

consisted of the electrical generation and transformation losses of 9/23 KV)

A breakdown of the above costs is as follows:

Plant - 24%

Fuel - 64%

Operating Costs - 12%

For energy produced and received in excess of 47 million KWH, the Institute

allowed an additional discount of 0.5 lira/KWH.

1968 - The plant discontinued power generation for the following reasons:

The plant was designed and built for continuous usage of its total steam

capacity (70-75 tons from 3 boilers), increasing power generation whenever

heat load requirements are reduced and vice versa. This method of operation

generally results in economical operation of the Thermoelectric Power Plant

Since the operation of the Thermoelectric Power Plant proved economically

unsound, it was decided to discontinue generation of electricity because:

A. The heat supplied was less than anticipated (reduced by about 20%)

,

resulting from fewer consumers than originally anticipated.

H29
/

B. Electrical generation was at least 37% lower than anticipated, of which

22% was attributable to the boilers and 15% to a deficiency in cooling

water supply to the condensers.

C. Particularly high labor costs due to the high cost of plant maintenance.

The second is a project being pursued by the Azienda Servizi Municipalizzat

(ASM) of Brescia (a town 60 miles east of Milan of about 150,000 inhabitants).

The municipality is pushing towards connecting every house of the town with

a district heating system (teleriscaldamento) . At the beginning of 1976,

ASM ordered an 18 megawatt boiler-turbine system in order to produce electric

and thermal power. There are no plans to expand to the full MIUS concept,

however, ASM is open to the potential of MIUS technology.

The third is the FIAT experiment. In Turin, FIAT has designed and is

beginning a Total Energy System for the cafeteria of its Research Center

at Sangone. After construction and testing, FIAT anticipates that they

will be able to transfer the plant technology - and perhaps even the

plant itself - to an apartment complex for FIAT workers. A copy of the

initial project summary form is enclosed. Refer to Enclosure 7.

FRG (Mr. Piller

)

In the Federal Republic of Germany, there are a number of energy related

projects, several of which are MIUS related. FRG has instrumented a total energy plant which is now being tested and evaluated. There is a study into the possibility of district heating from thermal power plants

in the Federal Republic and a planning study for district heating from

thermal power plants in the Mannheim - Ludwigs-haten-Herdelbing area.

EDITOR^S NOTE : Mr. Piller described in some detail the total energy

instrumented plant, however due to difficulties in transcribing the tape

that portion is not included. Mr. Piller will be consulted for help; and

the additional material will be provided with minutes of the next CCMS-MIUS

Project meeting.

Belgium - (Mr. Michel)

In Belgium they have district heating systems. Only two are working on

the MIUS principle. There is a nuclear plant being studied on two basis.

One considers using load level temperatures by using (heat peak heat

pumps?). The first calculations in this case pointed out that the town

with 20,000 people was too small and not dense enough for district heating.

Another application in connection with green houses is the use of load low

temperature water from the nuclear plant for tropical fruits. Results have

been good.

H30
In the last meeting I discussed two heat recovery systems in Brussels.

One is a large office building 100,000 square meters now under development.

Another is a center 5000 square meters which was completed in January 1976.

A third project is a swimming pool using solar energy combined with heat

pumps. We have a National Program of Research covering a wide range of

projects such as solar collectors, heat pumps and total energy.

France - (Mr. Simon)

In France there are four big projects. One in northern France will convert

a plant to the T.E. idea. Another is supposed to be built which will employ

a gas turbine to supply electricity and heat. In Paris there are two

projects, one is to take in old network in northern Paris and surrounding

suburbs and provide central or district heating along with electricity;

another idea is to use a compound reactor for generating electricity.

Another project involves the generation of electricity by compound nuclear

reactor with a study of heat pump use.

The last project involves the distribution of hot water from nuclear plants

producing 60,000 cubic meters/hour of hot water. Generally, the work in

France is directed toward a more efficient use of electricity and

investigation of processes that can more efficiently and conveniently use

electricity than other forms of energy; expansion of district heating;

expansion of nuclear power plants; exploration of the advantages of

smaller power plants (such as modular size) as opposed to larger power plants.

United States - (Mr. Steve Cavros, ERDA)

The expanded concept of MIUS that is developing here today covers more and

more the scope of our program at the Energy Research and Development

Administration (ERDA) that deals with Community Energy Systems particularly

integrated utility systems. It lays a foundation for a later and more

complete coverage in various programs. I will speak primarily about the

scope of our programs. The Community Systems Program is made up of the

scope of three basic elements, the central one being Integrated Energy

System. Next is a companion one that in a technical sense is community

design and urban systems. INext is institutional problems which we identify

as "commercialization". We have some goals. We are primarily concerned

with testing the institutional problems of today. This is very similar to

what HUD is doing. We are working with other U.S. agencies and institutions

such as Universities to get integrated utilities considered. Concerning

integrated community energy systems - we are developing a feasibility study

of a grid connected integrated total energy system at the city of Pasadena,

California. Here we have the cooperation of the mayor, local government,

local redevelopment agency of the downtown area and the municipally-owned

water and power company. What is interesting institutionally about this

arrangement is that this system is based on the following.

H31
The power company, the utility company will be grid-connected and municipallyowned, the output will go into the grid, and the plant will be thermally

loaded to achieve optimum efficiency. The power company will be accepting

electrical output from the project and giving the project credit for the

power received. In this case, you have the system paying the project for

standby use instead of the other way around. This arrangement was arrived

at primarily becuase the municipality has a need for supply. This arrangement

may make the system economically feasible because the feasibility studies

show a small heat load in California. The final report will soon be available

and by the next CCMS-MIUS project meeting I will be able to report on its

progress and if we have gone ahead.

ERDA is also conducting a feasibility study on such unusual things as using

cold sea water (there are cold layers of sea water out a few kilometers) in

such municipal areas in Florida, Calfornia and Hawaii where there are heavy concentrations of hotels and motels.

We have an effort to move away from scarce fuels, primarily oil and gas.

The initiative has already been taken by HUD in the ease of the coal-fired

MIUS study. We are looking at the coal-using integrated community energy

system and attempting to work out the software program, the analytical

tools which will look at all of the possible conversions of the secondary

energy form of the gas and direct combustion. We are also studying patterns

for the secondary energy form and looking at the community services

required, taking advantage of research already complete or being performed

by other agencies.

We have a proposal from a university which if accepted and funded will

result in an actual f luidized-bed, coal-fired facility.

ERDA has a major long range program, the Advanced Technology Mixed-Energy

Systems (ATMES) at the Argonne National Laboratory to be conducted on a multi-year basis. We hope this program will be the central development

of future energy systems for integrated communities. This will produce more

programmatic information instead of technical information. ATMES is the

novel synthesis of existing, emerging and future technologies. Technology

outputs of various factions of ERDA will be compiled and synthesized, as we go

into the future, and fed back into ERDA with modifications and adaption which

will make a subsystem technology perform better.

In two years ERDA hopes to have any analytical tool which will allow us to

look at any city or community of any size and be able to simulate with

reasonable accuracy the energy consumption of that city. This tool would be

used for design as well as for analyzing utility loads, not in terms of

peak or average loads but in terms of real time energy consumption, starting

with service demands. We hope to place this tool in the hands of the urban

designers so they can evaluate their designs.

There is an interest in developing a methodology for combining the science

of "oekistics" (human settlements and science) urban design in a demonstration

project and the possibility of working with the ATHENS Center of OEKISTICS.

H32
An analytical matrix will be used to combine the design of settlements,

neighborhoods, buildings, community with an energy component to improve

energy utilization.

ERDA is also developing mechanisms to reduce institutional and financial

barriers associated with integrated utility systems. This will be helpful

to municipalities and financial institutions.

GENERAL DISCUSSION

Mr. Simon further described projects related to MIUS in France particularly

at EDF. He stated that EDF has about 100 projects that are concerned with

economizing on energy consumption.

Mr. Grjebine commented that in the catalog we should include an economic

analysis of the project as a whole and the project broken down into its

constituent parts.

Referring to the earlier request for identification of research needs, Mr. Phillip

announced that Mr. Michel of Belgium will head a committee composed of

Mr. Michel, Mr. Piller of Germany (who will consult Dr. Klein for a designated individual to represent Germany) and Mr. Cavros of the U.S.

They will identify research needs in integrated utility systems and identify

the priorities. Mr. Michel has agredd to coordinate the activity and

prepare a brief report for the December meeting. The U.S., acting as Secretariat, will provide Mr. Michel with a mailing list and the administrative

support required to provide this report.

Mr. Phillips and Mr. Harris emphasized the importance of each attendee

expressing his ideas on research needs. All attendees should transmit

their ideas to Mr. Michel.

Mr. Phillips closed the session on the research needs and turned the meeting

over to Mr. Simon to explain and conduct the shceduled tour of EDF

laboratories. Mr. Phillips on behalf of the group expressed their

appreciation to EDF for hosting the meeting.

TOUR

The tour included projects performing research in the following areas:

Heating - Air Conditioning

Lighting

Domestic Appliance

Solar Energy - Component Testing

Transportation - Electric Cars and Coaches

Industrial Applications

HF

Osmosis

Water Treatment

Heat Pumps

Computer Measurements

END OF MEETING

H33

CCMS-MIUS Project ATTACHMENT 1 5 / 18/76

Tasks

1. Develop a glossary of terms related to integrated utility systems

in order to expedite the transfer of information.

2. Develop a "catalog" of MIUS type of projects planned or in progress.

3. Develop a summary report system to highlight quickly research

activities and reports. (Integral part of "catalog")

4. Develop a uniform reporting system for reporting progress and

evaluating performance of CCMS-MIUS related projects in order that

they may be compared with each other.

5. Develop a uniform methodology for the measurement of performance

and the taking of and reporting of data related to CCMS-MIUS Projects.

Goals

1. To provide all participating countries with a current and viable

Glossary of Special Terms for the CCMS-MIUS Project by May 18-19 , 1976.

2. To assemble and distribute a catalog of project descriptions to all

participating countries by January 1977.

3. To establish a file of Project Progress /Evaluation reports by

April 1977 on those CCMS-MIUS related projects for which the

sponsors and investigators have agreed to provide data. Information

from this file to be available for dissemination to participating

countries upon request.

4. To help bring about the development of a standard methodology for

the measurement of performance, and taking of and reporting of

data resulting from testing of and demonstrations of CCMS-MIUS

related projects.

H35

5 / 18/76

The following decisions are necessary for implementation of the Catalog of

Project Descriptions. Below are suggested alternatives:

a. Guidelines for type of projects to be included.

b. Design of identification number for each form.

1. Sequential as they appear in catalog.

2. A multiple part number.

(a) Section-Country-Sequence

(b) Country-Section-Sequence

(c) Section-Type of Project-Country-Sequence

(d) Section-Type of Project-Sequence

(e) Etc.

c. Contents of the Catalog Front Matter (Introduction)

1. Purpose

2. Scope

3. History and Description of CCMS

4 . Participating Countries

5. Instructions How to Use Manual and Organization of Manual

6. Discussion of Project Summary Form and Use

7. Discussion of Three Level Reporting System

8. How to Acquire Additional Copies

9 . Preface

10 . Cross-Index

11. 0 th er s

d. Organization of Catalog

1. Projects sequentially

2. Projects by classification (See e. below)

3. Sections by Classification (See e. below)

4. Multiple Volume (page limit, etc.)

e. Classification System

1 . Random

2 . Country •

3. Utility Service

4. Scale (cost, comnunity served, etc.)

H37
5. Type of Project

(a) Total Energy

(b) Integrated Utility System

(c) Thermal Storage

(d) Solar

6. Scope of Project

(a) System

(b) Subsystem

(c) Component

7. Purpose of Project

(a) A demonstration

(b) Verification of a technical

(c) Pilot Plant

(d) A technical laboratory

(e) An operational system

8. Nature of Project

(a) Harware Development

(b) Evaluation of Existing Systi

(c) Feasibility Study

9. Status

(a) Planned

(b) On-going

(c) Completed

f. Type of Graphics, Printing, Binder, etc.

1. Photos of Demonstrations (selected)

2. Photos of Operating Plant (selected)

3. Photos of Laboratory Facilities (selected)

4. Cover Illustration t 5. Type written. Typeset, etc.

6. Looseleaf (3-ring, multi-ring) bound (soft cover, hardback)

g. Who will Publish

1. CCMS

2. CCMS -MI US Project

3. U.S.

( a) NBS

(b) HUD

( c) EPA

(d) DOS

4. Other Participating Country

h. Should the Catalog be published with copyrights?

i. Methods of Financing the Printing and Distribution of the Catalog?

1. CCMS-MIUS Project (Contributions by Participating Countries)

2. Secretarial

3. Price per copy

H38
j. Should the catalog be made available upon request to recipients

outside the CCMS-MIUS Project?

k. Should availability of the Catalog be publicized or announced

outside the CCMS-MIUS Project? If so, to whom?

l. The number of copies of the catalog required.

H39

FOR

DATA FORMAT COMMITTEE

Comments received on Proposed Project Summary Form:

1. Comments from the Netherlands

During the last meeting it was assumed that also MIUS related projects

dealing with some special features incorporated in MIUS projects were

also of interest.

Therefore I would suggest the following comments on the project

Summary Form.

- CCMS-MIUS PROJECT SUMMARY FORM to be read as CCMS-MIUS AND MIUS RELATED SUMMARY FORM

- Add one box in which is indicated which utilities are

provided for as:

° electric supply

° heating

° cooling

° solid waste treatment

° sewage treatment

etc.

2. Comments from Italy

(a) I think the Summary Form should also be aimed at making

the selection of MlUS-like projects easier, in order to

facilitate preliminary comparisons prior to the consulting

the Reporting Formats.

But even such a rough selection can be made only if some

essential technical data can be excerpted from the Summary

Form itself.

Otherwise one would have to have recourse to the Reporting

Format for every MIUS project.

In view of the foregoing, I think it will be necessary to

provide the Summary Form with some technical data, such as e.g.: 1. Plant location

2. Degrees-day at the site

3. Maximum available (thermal and electric) power

of the plant

4. Type and size of

residential . .

commercial

industrial

5. Services supplied

i) Electric power

ii) Residential heating

iii) Residential cooling

iv) Sanitary hot water

v) Waste Treatment

users

dwelling units

m^

Mw (th. + elec.)

H40
vi) Water Treatment

vii) Commercial and/or Industrial heating

viii) Commercial and/or Industrial cooling

With this kind of data available on the Summary Form I think

a preliminary screening is indeed feasible.

(b) In order to introduce the above data into the Summary Form it

will be necessary to modify the selection of and the space

allocation for the different items in the form. For example,

it seems to me that the space allotted for items 8) and 9)

should be reduced, with more details devoted to the Reporting

Format, without-however-impairing the quality and the amount of

information required for a Summary form-based preliminary

screening.

Comments on the Project Progress/Evaluation Report form are represented by the attached revision.

H41
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM |

t

r Identification !

1 .Title of Project

|

2. Date

j

3. Performing Organization 4. Principal Investigator!

5* Support! na Organization 6. Duration of Research!

7. Estimated Funding and Manpower

y —

8. Purpose of Research

9. Status and Results 1

;

.

This project is: planned)p in-progress JJ completed

10. Utilities Provided}

electrical power idwastewater treatment!

Q space heating) Dsolid waste processing

HI space cooling] Qpotable water) •' potable hot water! '

1 1 . Type o f Project

|

public private

Q cooperative!

12. Exchange of Dataj there be data available in a form applicable for '

di ssemi nati —

on' to other CCMS parti cipants?Q yes o no j — 1 1 , H43
I

i 13 . Technical Data, I dent 1 f i cati on , ho. i

i

plant location, ^ Type and size of user 1 degree-days(at site;

a . res i den ti a 1 ( dwe 1 1 i n g units),

hours above 26.7 C b . res i den ti a l( square area-m|V

plant capacity! c. commeri ci a 1 (square area-m^),

a. power (MW) 1 d. industrial (therma l+elec.-MW)—

b . heati ng(MW)l

c. cooling (MW )|

d. wastewater t reatmen t- 1 i ters/day

e. solid waste processi ng-ki 1 ograms/day ; f. potable water-li ters/day — !- —

14. Other Related Projectsj

8. Purpose of Research(cont.)|

9. Status and Resul ts( con t. V

f - " - — ’ ~ 1 - — ——4j

H44
SAMPLE

OAK

RIDGE

NATIONAL

LABORATORY

PROJECT

IDENTIFICATION" I UJ ^3 1 5 CO ' cr r~. LD iI!i O ZU1 «XUJ • « 

UJUJ_J4 Uto ztoo mm z zoiuaa _) • a XU4 IW04hhh0 — X -34 0 a k-aunoh-uj— ia-

»xo>»-

a z OOUJ to

K UJlO UJUJ 003- o o ZOCLXUJIOO — UU4

ZUHZOI'I o o 4 U1 U1 — t-<zx zZu 0 in -*a z XUJ — 04 •— UX OO — < v a " > h400JttlIlfl<(JUl w O JIU u. J UJ UJ X UJ X —

IIL 33113 < 0 xxuaxujto_jozi-x hod <z a z UJ UJ H X_|tO_JQOZuJ -0(1- o o IhdltdOO - — x — Uj> SIAKSZ a h443UOO»l«IX

Oil *3 3* 4 *• 4**—

X • UJUJO u.— < < a x oa o — to oi z — 0) • — a o_i - ZX- lt< >0130 33 Q >• XZ4U. * uj 4 O X UJ — tf-UJ-O UJ Si UJ400'0'S' IhhOU a x ouj o h. O JVZUJ < —

uj ujx

— in o »4 z <0V

—

— 4JOXU.OU.Z ZHll - z >ou)zo<- aj3D

UJ i> s 3 X

m

x uj uj o z - to < N \OZOQ N Q UJX X 4 4 — UJ >02 N > t>£ZO J1 a < jz auj -i>ujzx 44--3- UJ 4 UJ UJ O 13 Z — — -< UJ — 3 X ZhOO - UJ h- X _J h- — UJ — O— 3 xOa< o z u Oh-k-ul X ZU-IOO a a <oi- UJ < k-z >>OUJ — UJ UJO 0 UJ 3V» — Nol u a uiujuju.uj_j -ix—< o > — — x — Si uj — MOoiuiaOO < ui Si <«-• ui-ja uj x, UJ IU- -3 XJJO X»X UJ z < J —Ol • u a h-IJ- — X ooo a 0 » — a uj uj z < z It — 3 4UJ UJUIOJ s omju» a a < tLttZtt'J13X>XXj4 a UJ

N t tt — 4 4.- S N OUJ — (J) 30— 0.4 u N z o OuUluOZ — a Si XUIIOJU-IJo UL — < o — JIIZOOU .» z UJ CJ UJUJ JJ-.J X-3 3 < — —

UJ

—

— 3 3 — UJ <J> *• •4 uiauo-uiK'/ih 9 Si

N < lA X X — — M z c- Z3h.(J3*0<Xuj v <-s < N OI/HL — in < 3 X Z UJ 3 N <x oo — ajhjii < M zaa 3 0 x X u < V X 0ul3I>03 — :JJ Q 44 —

uj < uia

— a. o Z L5 x<z xoaoxzz> z z -1 tihi-i n UJ a a 3 4uia<axx3uj- < < — — — jx a x — v» • u a UJ UlUJ X 3X1 -ZJ -1 > N 0 OUJ - 'A UJ 0 < UJ z x > — h- x cn — Oui -J 0

3-0)

x o K

a < UJ UJ uj 02 •OXOUJ34XO z > — » — 430)3X ee z a— o-zazx-ox Q <fi V- < 4ujx z a o u. X 3 j J XUZUJ4 4-X 33 0 z <

UJ or -ii UJ o z < < UJ

u Ul < 11 Z X z UJ z Z _i uj 4 o a z o ZN KOI Z ZUIUJ > 4 u UJ X o <UIJUI z

in Si

O • o — ZZ-OO-IjJU

Naa

M UJ > —

— a. uj < > J z "4 CO

N o«o<-— - -z z < N UJ 301 : i- • m • Z O --ax-i-r q<o a HI X N < Si 4WOnj< Z 0 z a < O UJ 4-MUU1ZZ- —4 tn u to 0 < 004ZM0 V 3 o 3 ZN W MUJX> X UJ — O < X 01 K UJ a < Z 9 - 4- 'A z Si • ••N UJ — X Ul Z OJIlL UJUI < a « 9 M V in in x < o - 0 >• Si X<auiUJ'3LJ-* ZhQ > UJ N N o 3 3 — ZU UJ 44 a < 0 Si 3 — Q Xhl/I »(10 J a a Si o z z a r -uj — 4 if> H z a Z < — X J3Z — h- — < X z o UJ z o M 3-31 * 3 < o ox u. X4Q<01— X— X- Ul UJ u. a — u J * 3 — o o -J U) o UJUJ 3 oxzaz jjzui<3h a •J o z uiu. z -1 z M z mJ K O4O-IH3UO-0I UJ Si o o r uj uj - o - a o z > -J • z O - UJ u. — z — >- b- N UJ 0 u * a *4 k*) -J oz o 3X34 - <-OitOUl < D <J <J a «- 4 -JUJ O H X • XO as) ha<ZQI/l 0)u — 3 UJ H- a o 4 X Z Ool X J < Q z K h- HhOlUl X— 01 X 04 0 o UJCCO u3u < X < o ZCA < (/1-.IU 01 - — Z 3 3 UJ N o o z touj-oa z o •4 03 Z 0-0.1 X o>x> N UJ S) CD z — uj - -uj- r u. 2 UJ UJ M uo t*4 UJ X 4— 01 < Ul x— X 3 Z K z UJ -4 a 3 u- u i- o UJ H u < X 0 k-H(j UJ (J UJ ol < 4 O O Si -4 a N < O UJ 4 — r z < z UJ » X 4 Z — • Z 4UI > — < • <

uj to - (OtO 3 z M CL * auj o I133000flQZijZ 0) 9 > a UJ X - 004 o N A CO u 004 O ul 11 > —3— Ul h* UJ X s lp?j*l- a 04 m V UJ — — 3 > ol O Q 44 H N z h-Q, • UJ tO UJ 3 v> z Si\t z Pt03i)03UJCDX0aX N z S) < z o •It X z *- M *4 ZUl o ZJh<ZOh JlUltl'< 3 < a 9 o

0* it »— o — uj < X

X oo •4

— 4 xx>401— Oljo: 4 UJ

— » OIO(/)Z<OUJ ^ 9 W (/) o 00 a iuz o oi 340 oi -J > u. K < UJ C 4 UJ (0 X s U < < Off-tU- jO> O 3 < 44 o < > tO K X to UJ O UJ z X <o > uj uj - < z to uj — x a Si z N >

CL 3 4 3 X

— • vQ UJ UJ (JUJ

a XUlSo >43QV>X OS o 5 UJ o a

UJ >x o -a o — h\3 o *•3 UJ < X o UJ tout o o —

a KJ* UJ

l/> «•— IhUU

J Si •< < JO </) hjyua ztooxuj o </i UJ 44 (7> S) Z hJOlOZ 3 o< > 4 z CL Sa z o 3-003 - X N u. - z o i>Oa < - — r- o Si • a </i oa o IA x Q4-Z- • X — Ul a - < Uh o u UJ uoox > • « u. x a a VJ X UJ 4UJ Z3 4 — 1 — < • — N oa VJ a -» JOJ o a >. • UJ Si a UJ— a X 4 <301X01 01 N Si • UJ o «Z3 -40 ncr >- UJ< </> N XX — 01 Ullt UJX — o 3 4 < a 0 axh i 3 z •4 z •J <UJ 01 >- - — — — O 13- * UJ < O 2 Si UJ UJ40in 4 ON JO — N a^- UJ >0!4Z3 4UJZ »XXSN IN- 44 UJ UJ

(/) 134®

J • 'Si “4 UJ_| o</> NUl too UI4UJX

— 0—

X <01 • z a > Si 0 JhJ4 -X o l K id 4 3- o > N 3 tO 3 3 3-Z-- 0X3 uja < UJ O 0 N 4X4000— N-4 '( 3L 3S2 < XSi n 301—0 xoi — — z— — ul — O N • > N Z n > ao>oh(/u\ • a f *>P •o Z J a N > 01 — UJIL — Z <301 — 

noinOj\ z > — O — zujo oooui l-io OX- 3 ^ z « (3 3 010—00)3 3X01 — -o < • > CM — 1 o «n i> XX *on\ Vt/* UJ a a -< uia 3 Z 3X03 — — 3 — 3 • * 3 01 O n a

UJ

— Z O OUOOMU Oh-)< uj

a (^0 <UJ 01(330 3 3 — <01X 01

— o j Z 0 U- ^ N 0 UJ ZO — Z- UJO -OX o < • ZN < < -a n z z OZMI3ZXOX>3 01- - oa JZ-0O K > u z

UJO 3 *• <WWOS •0 2 -J • XO 4 •• UJ -—

—O • — 3 —

— 03 3 < OJ

— • 0* <T \ -J •• # a a < uooh N O UJ 1 • (/I x •* X O) 3 4 — 01 XOX V 3 *X *4 — OJ H ••

n s)o Z UJ U. (JON

J

N

— UJ UJ > — < a «>'</>

—

— 3 Z — O— Z 4 a

N

— uj < a o Z o UJO to 4 Z X O ZO •3 OOKZv-OZ r» _j UJ z z UJ >-— < x o oi x x »-«a3 ooju>a^a » 44 ej o •• •• n cua. *o <oou O 1 z • • —4 O rs -l>- •• 3 — N3Z3XO— — — 0401— 3 — O 1 — "h • OhJU •• —

criunio j fSJ

— ~ ~ JO - ^ < z n

x

a

a -1

X < —— -1103-04 CtJ-O * 4 OJ .. 2 a o ou « a >- z n •• X o o Si~*Z. s oJk vuosh —v- d a*^*4<a o o Si Si J a </> 2 a > 3 o ^ z •• U GQUJU UJOlilO O 1 X W(J < < 0"UU2<0 •• tLOBcnU-Jlii CI2UJO O J W 44 < • uj uj n Z 0 o UJ UJ ^ •• i/> uj uj oa< oa«a<az>(Nj'/> no UJ'^••Qn HJQQXQ< 21UJ oou.aua o v zj ui N O a. 1 h*ZV)Z h<lt XO>\ i x juu. z • • < IZUJXXZ — 1/12 > UlhlUIOtJEh 1 iSJO< ••-2 1 < a - — <UJ — 333UB3 OJhh Dh < ~ X -3U-UO< -a -oiz ija-u z -UJ - IL > -> o d <m a u < o w u. uj — < « 3 uj a — < O 0 4 h. (fl •• ^UUJ-lLZh^Z Si 0 UJ — O 3 < - ul •• Z •• < 'sj o ujqn a a o • • u •• Xjj o OUIJ) — Z Xh-a z 0-U3Z 03- 3 I o oi o : - w z a z o *-aoa 03 Z<w oui O X -VJ 43aJ4uiOl3h312-l -4J-<J3h4 O D — UU1J3H JJ a j— o u o ^ - X z G “ « J - G kUJ«<uirh30^l 3 >- < C ^ n a a 0 -J * — 0 -1 o utn IJJUO<hN < aJ 4JU14 Jl/thQ - Zh-(/l -UJ 'lX<UJOUhWUKli< ILJ 043014 3 01 — 30 H* J"l — s *003 </> .£ - 0 IU - \?JUJh24a J3<Z k'1<U2., 44D<1U-4U 03 N > -IUJ ill > z « < z TM) o 30 OSiUlJ Uj ilZuis) on->uijoi ZIi^uO O013--OX3X X o Q-1W > (/> — 3 X 3 Z 3 0 0 V «jll-luj-.-4'uz_JuJ0UJ< N O - * kJ- a 3 <3 Z •J J. ^0UUJlLj3UUJU 3JUKU NO — zo;za-) t < u u. _• o i/iuwomaz - z'jlx m O X k -44J1QI1IJJ) -4v/)UJOa — O On Z UJOQh— S)Z Oj<k -X 3 JlQX X Jl/lvl a v OU^O UJ u ujhoiizuiiiuazdj < < Jl X (/) o N X n — uu — <<ai- N H45
«A

• r wo* uj zuju. ZjIZ^uQIO

O —t- < z < * - r uj u. o uj i-»ZI>IUOj

* z ~£i 3355

o — ou m a

z UJOQH <uj

uj — m ZUUJ^ J

2 C:^<-X<<

j U. O JD

x auj i * uj mo z

uj o-uiviuz

- u -ioct<

< « JKX JUJ

• «j < o o a * n- Z K K O

uj <vj * mu < a x

• _j * uujujw

uj r k

o a u. o < <

• *K — zo <

Z U« < Z JO OlO jOU> M ->- - - - o u

>- - x uk k — m z

< o x - < < j —

a u x-yz - O

m a < _j-u u k

- ana -u, ® QOl UJ < JOO

Zi/ix> a

- — u — o a >• z

< X X - Z <- O

U X U U — — — KkIZk^JQ 1<Ou) «uj

uj i l^auoju

«- j OD^z3<

'/I — UJ • — < -J x d>- z

*\j ua

* <nm — 3 m x < I U mK'U U U B O O * 3 03 x - ma jz

z K < X K O O -J a *- *- -J * H -i

uj in — o Jk*< Jm

K Z 9 (SJ — UJ UJ —• < - Z * z r a

3 x z z u, </> CO Z X Uj o o rz- UJ CL — uiuaxv)

K >- k cnx a x <

Z Lj UJ U — o oizwijau ja

KD-cn < x o *Dcnuj x il uj - X Z Zio Qt

•JOO u b o -QKuj

- m Z X JU z KZXODUlUJ —

X cn « X O U. X u a>- uu.x xo^>< a ujuj < zx^a<- k u — ou — a ujuj

1/1 X J Z ^ IQ

U x m x uj X < UJ UJ — O _J • UJ b z ao x om aa UJ - U. < ¥

r jua -xo - — 3. K 2 0^

8

- O < X < B U

__ 0. U U U > — < O -III UJ <02 cn u. Z J

UJ UJ D • Z D J

> X — OJ< u — -KX -QTKZB

— — D U O - U —

u * o I in uJZin

UJ K U. X Q. D U < • - U. < O -j rx<iu>a

--X 3 x n

j

u

> in < _} — u. o<

I mO U joo\ • b V <3U</> O— m • os

— I1hhj> ZO k in • t- O — <2Q-inoJZZ 0<

O X _j Z» OoJ 3 S UJ azD < uox x - ox

o ou-jm — u<u. — n • o —XX UhjU" O O UJ

• • \JJH-w. u< JQO • K

LJ’IIUU Z X UJ UZOOV)

u**-d -i:o>or..<

Z •• o U. >- UJ U H U B

UJ — ••CcnO u. Q Ms lulZl- 0X0 J O > UJ x* — a a zd m <sxx XX— X — x -Ok-o D

Ui Q - XUU UiO ZZ •* I k

23 UxZ< X -J < X o U J j-:^czDi xzxd

in 22 <^Gk- z - « u

i/)<uur: — < xoau — oom o - x j k x z in x XXX X — <i JUOOkZU.D2<C>U<

Z uu i j x i. x x < iu csjuKmou

a K M o

UJ a -J o

IL UJ O X

In o O a

z u

< Q v> B

X 3 UJ s

K X U z K

# z X u

K a U.K UJ < UJ K oz K

UJ K < UJ —

I z UJ >- X s X s UJ z za m u

in u s UJ — o X u X X 3 z < a «J < a o — • Q N < J OUJ o <

in m u o u v J • N K — in UJZ — — NX u z V >o 3 • O UJ 3 z s m UJ — CD <

• K O u UJ UJ o in » o< o- UJ K u .x X z ® B a: m- z as duj o o

• a • • — DO 5 > u. in O UJ u • z o - < z K

>» • a — m - a m <

s in o o a tx u. o zu - i\» 02 .Q UJ H * -ou < u o

• z - z

OUJ U < N —

O u z s • o D< ML I S Z QO OX

Voobuk^u^-

0 I «*K * O

nj — o — — < — xxxujruu — oozcnj — z >u:j - q b oi<— — x<uj z<oz«* —

OQ au »OZ \3 UJX — ••>.

1 cta:a«dj..D — iZhiiAZo

-U«KlL X — -|JUC<UJv 02

o J < <*/)••••<— UlLU — X o OOIJ-ZZ K UO_Z

O m-U 2332 Dk 20 :oI o c\j •• k x < d — — a — u u - osjji/x Ji/iKH^- uj xx SD-JUU<Z<<Z — om*.>mK 3 Xu 0 mx 30 mu \0-ZaJ*-CLDUXXDX-luJU OXK«10^0jWNirtJUJ0(/)

NinK

o

s

•aX

ou

ru

a N

<

UJW) m

UJ —

X

• >

< a

• < - 3

• Z

« < s ->

m N

^ • a —

o *

B K 32

in >

z <

o x

l^v K

< UJ B z ON

*5

z <

s

x o u

ZUJ < K

• — a x

->u

• X

a <

UJ

CD K 53

ffl —

• K

Z u

• UJ

UJ z

z

t o

<

u

o

UJ -

o CVJ N

(X -

< O

Z O — • Z O

J • < I M — XI UJ w

(X • a z «s

ou

u. •o

< X - o

X X

u

UJK

N o—

z • zo • —m

UJX oo

B

U.Z 03

<o

JZQ-S

coo z ja

X- -

O 3 K

U. CD y <02 -UK

x k in UJ< z K UJ o -I u

a n ua z < o

u. _l — oq m

(OUJo

u z x in B

UJ — in m ! K O UJ xo O

-J u xz X X — a UJ< o u 3 3 K (D X OO Q • 3 m Z UJ X

• o mO UJ < UJ > z K

• K <0 m 3 z

< X OIL UJ

• UJ UJ Z u

< 12 mZ

• 1 W OO N X

z 4 -J- m u

o <UJ •«K K X m -J > N 3< < K o-* 10 ON z UJ < m k z 3 in B < M oz UJ

Ui z J UJ< O X O 3 x o HO z

_J UJ o <a — J

< z K u UJ o -1 u

z O J o Iw -J q o — < UJ m

o - -> — O v- O O • UJ J O zu. s S 2 S kO • m • _j U 1 K — V X V ujo m KUO < X o >» z < z - 3 X UJO X 3 n z n U UJ o mo z - m X 3 X z <M mz z

.•UJ — - z in o K U • *. oj m in 3 —

S X •• o U. UJ s Ok O m ^ s m x .. o UJ— Q

^ >m <r — s- z < s ^ — •z >mo in— _j n zu - kO oo — * >- K X - 3 Z oJ O mu —

•• o — •• s zz o i k •• k n o v — — Q — >

f\j — < — — <?*cr —

OOJJl/! jOZ< < O I I w — 03 3 S •• U oo xu in z .n on j s

x x ujd xo

u o u — z>- s < o z •» «m o

X X — *• Z z

i iio<K"< i zcD^-z^-xinzo — -HKk-lLU^INO DUO<XJ— OUx

o - /) •• .. — a •• — uil uj — <

O 0 0X0 — ZXK Z k UJ Q ^ O UJ o — •• K X o 3 — ^ u < — — u u—

OKUJin<u.^nKD — Uk- - uim x x sa jiuuj jz j -

— 32ZlZOi/]IGQulO j SO-Z.UJ3'-13<3 XUZ3XUU — w oxK-xo^oxo.uu-muujo^in

NinK

OJ

a z QSU. t t XU

in • TQ> UJ 30

K<ac m j • > J • cn-Q. l za it o 30 U

cnuSt

U *UJ < B Z N > #X oio<

- O • B

• 021

o UJUJ O

O J-X

ffljo V Ij®

s — UJO •• o o mu

O I l/) •• K

CVJ - < — -

o o in -J OI> — —

0 6 a x u

1 X oo < - UJ K K U. o u<

O <OI

o u. — u

o *n **k x o vO ujm < s t) JoJUJ o n k > in s O — z JJ o K K^X

CSj tf)

H46

I I
Modular Integrated Utility Systems MIUS

Measurement Technology

DRAFT

May 1976

Introduction

The CCMS-MIUS project has a number of objectives, one of which is the streamlining of the exchange of data concerning the layout of the MIUS and its

performance.

The main documents are:

- Reporting format for community total energy systems

- Reporting format for MIUS and total energy systems.

The underlying document covers the measurement technology and its phasing

is as follows:

1. evaluation of the conditions to be measured for calculation of the system's

performance

2. interface data

3. evaluation of the required specification of the sensors

4. assessing the crucial measurements from a comparison of the required

specification and the state of the art

5. evaluation of the field for further development of measurement technology.

Remark : This draft document contains only the phases 1 and 2.

General Remarks

There are many rules and standards concerning the measurement of the portorraance, both static and dynamic, of the cLemants in a MIUS system. This applies

to the national and international rules and standards. The rules and standards

can be applied under more or less ideal laboratory conditions.

The aim of this document is to present a basis of practical rules or codes

to ensure that the measurements are executed in such a way that comparison of

different MIUS systems is possible.

This means that the accuracy of the measurements should be acceptable (this

will, in general, be lover than can be reached under laboratory conditions)*

The fact that the measurements are executed under practical conditions means:

- the conditions are not constant

- the conditions cannot be controlled.
Approach

The aim of this document is to present the basic ideas that are applicable

to a large number of MIUS systems. This means that for unusual or complicated

MIUS systems the basis developed here is sufficiently broad to be applied in

the sense of the objective of this project.

Figure 1 presents an abstracted MIUS system. The MIUS system consists of a number of subsystems, which each have a certain function (it is thus not important in what technical way this function is realised).

The lines between the subsystems give the interrelation between the subsystems rather than the piping system as such. No indications are given as to

how the subsystem is connected to the main system (for instance the. air cooler

and the emergency water cooler).

Not only the MIUS system is essential, but also the buildings as a system are equally important, like the static and dynamic response to changing conditions

In the attached scheme a dynamic approach is envisaged.

In this document no attention is paid to the data acquisition system and the

processing of the data, one of the reasons being that the processing highly

depends on the layout of the project, the objective of the project and the

geographical conditions.

HA8
1 . Heat/power installation

Function: to convert fuel to electricity and heat in the form of:

- hot water for heating

- hot water for domestic hot water

- steam

The elements of the subsystem are the prime mover, the heat exchangers,

the exhaust gas heater or steamboiler, oil cooler etc. with their

controls.

In this .def init ion the type of prime mover is not relevant and the

definition applies to a gas engine as well as a steam or gasturbine as prime mover.

The electrical generator, with the cooling and controls are elements

of the subsystem.

2. Boiler

Function: to convert fuel to heat in the form of hot water or steam.

The pre-heating of the fuel (if required) or water treatment is part

of the subsystem.

This subsystem is incorporated in the total system and the feedwater comes from the steam or hot water circuit.

3. The hot water production for heating

Function: to produce hot water at the desired temperature and flow

for the heating of the building.

As the hot water from the subsystem 1 is directly used the subsystem

contains only the circulation pump as element.

Other elements can be: a heat exchanger or a heat pump to elevate

the temperature of the water. The heat pump is driven by an electric

motor and generates the possibilities to balance optimally between

heat and power production.

A . The domestic hot water production

Function: to produce hot domestic water.

Elements: heat exchanger with transport pump or heat pump if the

•temperature is too low and there is an excess of power.

HA 9
5.

The cold water production (chiller)

Function: the production of chilled water for the A.C. installation.

Elements of the subsystem: The chiller can be or a mechanical driven

compressor system or a heat driven absorption refrigeration installation,

or a combination. H j It is supposed that an electric motor is used to drive the compressor.

The pumps are also electrical driven (for large installations a direct

driven (gas engine or turbine) refrigeration installation is appropriate)

6. Solid waste incenerator

Function: to convert solid waste to ash, under production of heat.

Depending on the caloric value of the solid waste extra fuel

has to be added or not.

The main elements of this subsystem are:

- a solid waste burner and boiler

- ash storage and transport.

7 . Storage dryer solid waste

Function: to store the solid waste and eventually to dry the solid

waste.

Elements: - storage bunker

- drying section

- air ventilator, etc.

It is supposed that the dryer is heated with the hot water or steam.

8. Air cooler/cooling tower Function: under conditions that there is an excess heat production

the release of the excess heat to the environment.

This situation can arise in a number of conditions and also of a view

point of control and or reliability one ore more coolers has to be

incorporated in the system.

For instance:

- condensor chiller

- emergency watercooler for the prime mover

- release of excess heat.

H50
Elements: - air cooler

- cooling tower

- water cooler, cooled by ground water, or tap water.

9. Sewage /waste water treatment

Function: to digest the sewage and waste water in such a way that the

effluent can be discarded

(criteria: environmental rules)

and the sludge can be also discarded.

In principal this subsystem can be an anaerobic or aerobic digester.

Elements are:

- pretreatment (mechanical separation of water and large objects)

- digester with air circulation (aerobic) or with methane production

(relevant seems the aerobic digester)

- often treatment installation (if necessary) (dephosphat ing or denitrification)

- separation effluent - sludge installation (sludge decanter)

ANNEXE

The best accuracy of the measured performance of some installations

under practical conditions.

Remarks: the accuracy is given for the nominal conditions and installation

of medium capacity.

1. Heat /power installation, performance 5%

. produced electricity 0,1%

. efficient heat production 3%

2. Boiler

. overall performance medium 2%

. small boilers 5%

3. Hot water production for heatin

. overall performance 5%

4. Domestic hot water production

. overall performance 3%

5. The cold water production

. overall performance 3%

H51
Prime mover

- fuel input

- heat value

- electricity output

- in and out watertemperature and flow

- idem from the stack

Generator

Performance

included in prime mover

System for heating

(heat exchangers or heat pump)

Performance

- electricity or mechanical power

- temperature water in and out

- flow of water

- temperature heat source in and out

- flow water from source

Hot water production

as water for heating

Boilers

Performance

- fuel flow (and quality)

- outlet gas . flow

. temperature

- steam flow and conditions

- water temperature in and out

- water flow

Interface

- electricity

- temperature water and flow to:

. heat pump

. heat exchangers

. chiller

. air cooler

. solid waste dryer

Interface

- distribution of electricity

Interface

- flow hot water

- temperature water

Interface

- flow hot water

- temperature water

Interface

- steam flow and quality

- water flow and temperature

H52
Artificial cooler I & II

Performance Interface

- water flow - water flow

- temperature water in and out

- electricity consumption

- water consumption

- inlet air temperature and humidity

- idem outlet air and flow

- temperature of outlet water

- cooling water temperature in and out

- flow of cooling water

Chiller (electrical and/or absorption type)

Performance Interface

- power consumption - flow and temperature of chilled water

- temperature cold water in and out - outlet temperature of condensate and

- flow cold water flow

-hot water temperature in and out

- flow hot water (steam flow and

conditions)

- temperature and flow of cooling water

- condensor water temperature in and out

- flow condensing water

Waste water and sewage

(no recuperation of heat from waste water)

Performance Interface

- temperature and flow of water inlet - temperature and Plow outlet water

- composition (BOD and COD)

- power consumption

- temperature and flow water outlet

- composition (BOD and COD)

- sludge flow and dry material

- composition water -(BOD and COD)

H53
Incinerator

A = drying section

Performance

- hot water temperature in and out

- flow hot water

Interface

- outflow solid waste

- composition solid waste

- temperature in and out of air (and

humidity)

- flow of drying air

- power consumption

- flow of solid waste

- composition solid waste

- overflow solid waste

B

Performance Interface

- power consumption - temperature and flow of the heated

- solid waste flow and composition water

- temperature air in and out (and

quality)

- temperature water in and out and flow

- ash; composition and flow

Interface from the Complex to the MIUS

1 . heating

- temperature water and flow

2. hot water (domestic)

- nothing'

3. cooling

- temperature cold water

- flow cold water

A. sewage water

- flow water

- temperature water

- composition

5. solid waste

- quantity

- composition (more special humidity and heat value).

HSA
outlet gas

Figure 1. Abstracted MIUS.

H55
u

•J U -V o U v —•

rA .*4 > •'H U o O

v-i O V

C 'U *-» >-*

• r4 • *4 •) 0) U •—« rJ >» c o 's u

element daily mean +>I hourly mean coat inuousl

y

peak v

fuel + + + water + + - + elect r ie Lty +• + + +

lieatiii}' water + - V - hot water + - + + chilled water + + + -

:;o 1 id waste + - '.4 1 - ash + - - waste water : + - -

s 1 udge +

t i

~ -- -

F i i'li re 2

.

H56
ATTACHMENT 5 1076

Fo’" Hi a t i.rntiar. c!' Uv May 1M/I9 Foe ti

n

g of the

NAT 0- C JM S- MIU 6- It

o

j e c t

Some Aus trian MlUS- Pr oj sets

( 1 ) '0 —

1

„ fumn + Lon

' -Term Ene rgy S

t

ora^e

(

1 jM 1 i\ MnC Y- Sys t r n by E. Dulosy

Electric air to water heat pump with gravel-bed hea t storage below

the building, .supplying- air to the heat pump during cold spells.

Demon: :t rat ion building operable at Schoonau at the Danube, near

Vienna.

( ? ) Ice Sto rage

pup lying hoot to heat pump by freezing water, without piping in

the storage tank. Labors to ry- real o prototype, demonstrating the

feasibility of ice storage in operation by AECE Bonn enenevgi e , at

Institute of Th' riual Power and Nuclear Engineering, Graz University

of Technology.

( i i )

V/ as to 'Ra ter He at Re co very

(3) Do mo n s u r.at i on pi ant fpr

(iii

\) Sol • r energy for dome

(4) Do•r.oiist rat j n house ac If by ARCS Sons' nenergie, sponsored by the Austrian Ministry of

Buildings and Technology, in operation since summer 1975

( 5 ) Salzburg do no net rat i or nl an t

1 56 r;t of collectors plus storage tanks at several temperature levels

plus hen., pumps , supplying part of the heat load for hot vase r production arid heating eg the new Institute of Molecular Biology,

Austrian Academy of Science, at Salzburg, sponsored by the Austrian

Ministry of Science and Research, to bo operable sunnier 1976

( 6 ) ana Jeveral large and ali buildings

( i v

)

Solar Electric Powe r Planned : Very small (10 to 50 kW) solar thermal electric power

plant, mainly fer developing countries of low latitude.

F. V. Gi Hi

Graz, May 14, 1976

H57
ATTACHMENT 6 5/19/76

rOTA Ij ENERGY IKS' i ,\ TION in THE NKVTt KiIT.' ND- l

j . General info n'caiion

1.1 Project : office building, fully air-eondlriooed (absoj flion)

1.2 Capacity: 6.1,210 my 1.8 Employees: 1 , 100 persons

1.4 PilriiC movers : 0 caterpillar natural gr.s fuelled engines of 700 kvA each

1 . 5 Beeuperrtien : jacket water and exhaust; gas to hot water

1.6 Tech. department : 7 persons

2. Perform '1 see data

2. 1 Financial

197 A

1: 3 97 5

Generated kWh 2, 93 0, 730 2, 940,3 90

Item cost

cost/

kWh cost | cost./

| kWh

Fuel consumption / 99,638.

3.42.8 / 203,062.

1 6.906

Water / 250. — 0. 009 j 300. — 0.011

Lub. oil f 9,000. — 0.309 f 10,300.— 0. 350

Chemicals / 250. — 0. 009 f 300. — 0. Oil

Maintenance by contractors f 33,800. 1.332 j 49,000.— 1 . 666

1 Maintenance, supervision. 30,000. — 1 . 031 f 40,000.-- 1.360

rJ 177,938.

6.13.3 f £02,962.10.304

Recuperation f 45,754. -- 1. 571 / 99,936.— 3.399

Variable costs x

J 132,184.

4. 542 j 203,026.6. 905

Capital costs j

f. j 91,000. — 3.126 f 91,000.-- 3 . 095

Total costs J 223,184. --

i 7.GGS / 294,026. -- 10. 000

2.

2

Energy

- 1 074

- 1075

- 1 074

- 1075

- 1974 1 - 10751

- 1074j

- 10751

- 1974

1

- 1975

1

- 3.974 1 - 19751

- 1074 1 - 10751

Energy to engines: 1,315,187 x 7,560 = 9,912,814 Meal

Energy to engines: 1,313,000 x 7,560 ?•* 0,926,280 Meal

Energy to boilers : 250, 200 x 7, 560 ~ 1 , 80.1 , 51 2 Meal

Energy to boilers : 280,461 x 7, 5G0 - 2,120,285 Meat

Met heat, from boilers: 1,891,512 x 0,85 - 1,607,785 Meal

Met heat from boilers: 2,120,285 x 0,85 = 1,802,242 Meal

kWh to Meal: 2, 910, 730 x 860 = 2, 503,228 Meal

kWh to Meal: 2, 940,190 x 860 - 2.528,563 Me? I Gross heat recovered from engines: 4,447,900 Meal

Gross heat recovered from engines: 4,630,300 Meal

Net heat recovered: 4,447,900 - 386,500 - 4,061,400 Meal

Net heat rccovr j ed: 4, 680,300 - 298 , 500 - 4

,

831 , 800 Meal

Total net: 2,503,228 4 4,061,400 * 6,504,628 Meal

1 otal net: 2,528,568 + 4,531,800 — 6, 860 , 563 Meal
ciOi K-k-K

3 . 1 Overall engine efficiency

- 1 f > 7 -1 :

- 1975 :

2, oOn, M28 -1 , 00j_, 40°

'"9,^2,8M

2. 528j>03 -f_

.

3.?i_, r,o_o 8,~sY<3,2^0

x 100 %--- 6 G._ 02 %

x 100 % ^ C O. 1 3 %

Electrical

- 1974 :

- 1975 :

eff'cienoy

2 , 503,228

O', 912 , 814' x 100% r. 25 . 18 %

2 , 528,503

0 , 026,280

x 100 % = 25 . 47 %

3.3 Installation efficiencj’’

- 1974 :

- 1975 :

6 , 504,028 i 1 ,_ 0_() 7a_78Jl

17, 942, 814 + T, 891, 512

0 , 800,303 + _1 . 802, 242

If, 920 , 280 Cl 2

6

f 28

5

x 100 % - 69 . 00 %

x 100%- 71 . 91 %

4 . 3 .cod 3 : cl ox- etc.

4.

1

Loadfactor:

- 1974 : 2 , 910,730

900 >; 8,760

0 . 309 (900 - 2 x 450 kW max.

- 1975 : 2 , 910,190 _ 900 x 8

*. 700 3 0.373

Average load:

- 3 974 : 2 . 910 , 730

14,501 200 . 73 l-.W ( 14,501 hours/a)

and

200.73 . 1 MA

540 X 10 % 37 . 17 % of max. output per unit

- 1975 : 2.94 0,190

35,238 222.

3

0 kW ( 13,238 h/a)

and

'A:'.". i n

... i

i oo

5 x 0 % -- . 41 . 13 % of max. output per unit

dome

H59
4.3 Max. loud Ilnurs /a

- 1974 2,910,730

: MO

“ "

.-3--.

1,ours

- 1975

2, 940,190 0 _ ,

: - 3,267 hours

5. Recuperation

The savings according 2. 1 are / 45, 754. — and f 99, 93C. - for 1974 resp. 1975.

Calculated as follows:

- 1974 :: 1

Tsoo

0

" W X 0,07229 , / 46,764.

-- 1975 : 4

^SMxVbS

000

x M4825 = / 99, 936.

CV/IA (hr. Jongedijk)

d.d. 11 mei 1976
J'idl’jxE ] Ilcav balance of engine--generator unit at 40% load being year average.

waste heat

in

flue gas

11, 1 %

/

f /

//

1

\

l16%

\

16,1% ra diation

j0

net recovered heat

45% &

f• i

34%

• exhaust • jacket v/ater

gas

j

100% supplied energy

H61
Supplied

energy

to

engine

(Meal)

—

i J

GUO
ATTACHMENT 7 V

1. Title of Project ( Official title)

heat pump for air conditioning of buildings driven by

Diesel engine

2 . Date (Form completes. 1

27 April 1976

1 3. Perfonning Organization ( Complete mailing

address)

PI AT - C.R.P.

Strada del Drosso, 145

10135 TORINO

4. Principal Investigator (dame oral complete

mailing -address)

Ing. Mario Goffi

FIAT - C.R.F.

Strada del Drosso, 145

10135 TORINO

5. Supporting Organization (Complete mailing

address and name of contact

)

Commission des Communautes Europe ennes - CSN

Programme Economic de l’Energie

Rue de la Loi "200 - 1049 -Bruxelles

Mr. !!. Ehringer (*)

6 . Duration of Research (Beginning and end)

March 1975 - Dec. 1973

7'. Est muted Funding and Manpower (donies

and manyears)

Italian Liras 445 Millions

6 nan - years

CCMS-MIUS PROJECT SUMMARY FORM

Identifier von nz>. (Secretarial use only)

8. Purpose of Research (Objeebives , motivations^approach, plans and expected results)

Construction and comparative operation, of a pilot plant pov;ered by a Diesel engine

with an output of about 50 HP, for a pea:: heat requirement of about 140,000 keal/h

for winter heating (outdoor temperature of -10° c) and of about half the above figu

re for summer cooling (this on account of the smaller heat differential required).

The novelty, with respect to the conventional heat pumps (electrically driven) is

represented by the fact that the power is supplied by a thermal engine which allows

- the possibility of recovering the exhaust gas and coolant heat which would other

wise be lost.

The program develops through the following main phases: preliminary studies, study

and design of the system, construction, tests.

The final product is a running system for evaluating:

- Operation of the system for a full season with critical processing of the experimen

tal results obtained and comparison with the conventional system

- The defrosting problem.

9. Status and Results

- Study and project of the system: completed

- Construction: is now starting

This project is: plannedtlin-projressdcorrrpleted

10. Other Related Projects (Titles) 11. Type of Project

Hpublicffl private

[ \cC'Cff^>2 >* 'it ‘ " '

12. Exchange of Data Will there be data available in a form apolicable for

dissemination to other CC1-1S paa' tici pants ? yosdno — .)UJ,icct to authorisation of CEE - C'!R

KT5-3

APPENDIX %

MINUTES

OF THE

FOURTH MEETING OF THE

COMMITTEE ON THE CHALLENGES OF

MODERN SOCIETY

MODULAR INTEGRATED UTILITY SYSTEMS PROJECT

RATIONAL USE OF ENERGY PILOT STUDY

ON DECEMBER 7-9, 1976

AT

THE KERNSFORSCHUNGSANLAGE JUELICH

(Nuclear Research Center)

Juelich, Federal Republic of Germany

II
FORWARD TO MINUTES

The minutes of the fourth CCMS-MIUS* Project meeting presented herein

hopefully will be helpful to the committees in their work as well as

to document the results and action items of the meeting.

The minutes are a summary of the meeting and have attached several

significant documents that were distributed to participants during the

meeting. I believe that the most important points are highlighted and

that the minutes are reasonably accurate. I apologize for any material

which inadvertently may have been omitted, misinterpreted, or stated

incorrectly

.

Morris Nimmo - Editor

* CCMS-MIUS is Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society - Modular

Integrated Utility Systems

12
MINUTES OF THE FOURTH

CCMS-MIUS Project Meeting

December 7-9, 1976 i

The fourth meeting of the CCMS-MIUS Project was called to order at 9:00 am

December 7, 1976, by Mr. Clinton W. Phillips, Project Chairman at the Kernsf orschungi sanlage, Juelich (KFA) , (Nuclear Research Center) Juelich, Federal Republic of Germany .

following countries were represented and the attendees were :

Country Attendees Dec

7 8 9

Belgium J.A. Michel / / /

Federal Republic

of Germany R. Jank / / /

P. Kuppers / / /

U. Plantikow / /

0 . Renn / / /

J. Stocker / /

France T. Grjebine / / /

Italy A. Campanile /

M. Mangialajo / / /

Netherlands W. Jongedijk / / /

B.A. Kleinbloesm / /

J.A. Knobbout / / /

J.W.H. Van den Bergh / / /

New Zealand P. Mears / /

D.E. Paulay / / /

!

13
Country Attendees Dec . 7 8 9 Spain J.A. Gonzalez / / /

Sweden U. Renghold / / /

U.S. S . Cavros / /

P. Folan / /

F. A. Harris / /

M. Nimmo / / /

C.W. Phillips / / /

J.H. Rothenberg / / /

European

Communities G. Egberts / /

CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTION

Mr. Phillips welcomed those in attendance and described briefly the work to be

* accomplished during the three day meeting (1) formalize the glossary (2) approve the

structure of the International Project Catalog (3) review the measurement Technology

Committee ' s work on a standard methodology for reporting performance of systems (4)

review the research needs in integrated utility system technology (5) determine a termination day for the project and (6) arrive at a date and place for the next

meeting. Refer to the agenda Attachment 1.

Mr. Phillips thanked KFA for their effort and work in hosting the meeting and led

the attendees in an introduction of themselves.

WELCOME TO T'HE KERNSFORS CHUNGSANLAGE JUELICH (KFA)

Mr. J. Stocker welcomed the CCMS-MIUS Project Meeting to the KFA and described

some of the work of the KFA. Originally the KFA performed an important work, the'separ.

tion of isotopes, because of its work on uranium enrichment it started at

Juelich. Now this work has been taken over- by industry.

Juelich has mostly new houses as the older ones were destroyed during the war. The region is noted for sugar beets and its large lignite mines. The biggest open

14
pit mine in the world is within 10 miles of the KFA toward Aachen. Giant scrapers

capable of 200,000 tons a day are now in use. Electricity production within 20

miles of Juelich is the highest density anywhere in the world, and supplies 25% of

W. Germany's power needs.

Concerning the KFA, it has the highest high temperature electricity producing

reactor. It is a gas tube reactor (helium) with 950°C temperature. Mr. Stocker explained the history of how W. Germany's research was organized and how it became

centralized

The nuclear energy research program has five parts: (1) coal utilization (2)

mining technology (3) goe-physics and geo-chemistry (4) energy transformation and

(5) rational use of energy.

Rational use of energy, headed by Dr. Plantikow, began in 1974, with 4% of the

budget. In 1975 it rose to 11% of the work.

Mr. Renn discussed the arrangements for the day's meeting at the KFA, the tour

to Diusberg and the Agrotherm. He announced a reception and buffet in the evening for

participants

UPDATE OF CCMS ACTIVITIES

Mr. F. Allen Harris reported. With respect to the Rational Use of Energy, the

pilot study of which the MIUS is one project, work is at a completion stage for all

the component projects. Final reports from the International Data Base Project, the

Electric Utility Load Management Project, the Climatic Conditions and Test Reference

Year Project, as well as the MIUS Project will be available at the October 1977 CCMS

Plenary. The Climate Conditions and Test Reference Year Final Report has been prepared in draft. This work is being led by Professor von Korsgaard, who many of you

know from the Technical University in Copenhagen. The computer program, which is

the center core of the work for the Climatic Conditions and Test Reference Year is now

undergoing actual tests in three or four of the participating countries. In a year

15
or so participants will have actual experience based on climate data.

The cement report, a quite useful report, is the only thing like it in existence in which the energy efficiencies of cement industries internationally are compared. CCMS is very pleased with this work. The plastics report on polyvinylcloride

also has been completed and is now in the final editing phase. Both the steel and

the plastics reports are to be published early in 1977, and will be available at the

next MIUS meeting. The new project which has been undertaken in the data base work

i

l

I

j i!

::

deals with a demonstration project at a brewing facility to utilize the energy account-

{ ing methodology in a agricultural processing situation. By the early part of the

r summer four industries, steel, cement, plastics and brewing will have been covered.

The major work that is remaining in the International Data Base Project deals

with the central core of the Project which is methodology. The methodology group prepared a draft report, which was revised extensively since it did not address the plant

manager or the people who will actually be saving energy. The final meeting of this

project, will probably be held in late April in Brussels.

There are many recommendations, from the steel, cement and plastics with res- 9

pect to future research and development. One of these, which is certainly the. most

ambitious calls for the establishment of an experimental blast furnace which could be

dedicated 100% to experimental work in this technology. The problem is that if you

have interesting ideas with respect to a blast furnace, it is very difficult to find

someone who can test these on a real scale. Experts test these things in laboratories,

but that is really not sufficiently indicative of what the total energy savings will

be in the real world.

Additional ideas and recommendations will be discussed in the late January

meeting in Stockholm by the IEA Energy Conservation Subgroup Committee. The Electric

Utility Load Management is now in its final stages. This is primarily a cataloging

and description of a number of techniques which have been used to level energy conI sumption from the utility standpoint.

16
In terms of new projects we have one on flue gas disulfur ization . This project

111 prepare a catalog similar to the catalog which you, the CCMS-MIUS Project Committee

Lll put together, and it will include existing flue gas disulfur ization projects.

Another new project will investigate the problem of carcinogentic agents in

inking water by pooling present information. The project will also attempt to deter-

_ne the extent of the problem.

Mr. Harris, as requested by the Chairman, explained the nature of projects under

MS. They are usually 2 year projects which are investigated to determine their interitional interest. Occassionally CCMS will continue a project beyond 2 years, but its

tin goal is to begin a project and have it transferred to other international organizaon within 2 years if the interest is there. CCMS will follow a project for 2 years

ter it has been turned over to another organization.

‘DATE OF CCMS-MIUS PROJECT ACTIVITIES

Mr. Phillips discussed the beginning of the CCMS-MIUS Project and described

•iefly the accomplishments to date. The thrust of the committee's work falls into

le catagory of, how do we communicate with each other in terms of uniform terminology,

lere are the on-going projects of interest to MIUS , and what type of information do

s exchange. The order of business is to look at the first draft of the catalog, discuss

i outline of the standard methodology of reporting performance, and review the report of

ie research needs committee.

’DATE OF HUD-MIUS PROGRAM

Mr. Rothenberg descirbed some of the history and factors which brought about

le HUD-MIUS Program within the U.S. Dept, of Housing and Urban Development. HUD was

ieking a new growth option in utility research. Out of this need to aid communities

l their growth and the New Communities Program came the idea and inputs for MIUS.

ssisted by other agencies HUD inaugurated a three phase HUD-MIUS Program to evaluate

id access the technology, develop a breadboard test facility at NASA, build a TE

17
£:

. demonstration facility and a MIUS demonstration facility to assist in the implementation of the TE and MIUS concepts through the evaluation of test data, investigation

and amelioration of institutional constraints, and the dissemination of data and information on the results of the demonstrations. The Total Energy facility at Jersey

City, N.J., which is built on a Operation Breakthrough site, is the first total energy

i demonstration of the HUD-MIUS program. The MIUS demonstration at St. Charles, which

is in its preliminary design stage, will be the first demonstration of the more comprehensive MIUS concept.

Mr. Rothenberg described the total energy plant at Jersey City using several

slides to show the site and plant. One of the major publications of Phase I of the

HUD-MIUS Program is entitled "Technology Assessment of MIUS". It is in publication

at this time. Refer to Attachment 2 for preliminary data on the Jersey City Total

Energy Plant.

I For the MIUS demonstration, its objectives are, in addition to the measurement

of performance, to look at the public benefits and the viability of the private sector

designing, building and operating a MIUS, and to provide a data base to support and

evaluation of its performance, environmental acceptability, and economical feasibility

and to support policy decisions. It will further seek to examine the institutional

barriers

Mr. Rothenberg showed slides of the new community of St. Charles and the demonstration site while describing the size and characteristics of the area and possible

configuration of the MIUS users.

UPDATE OF MIUS TYPE OF PROJECTS

Belgium (Mr. Michel)

There are three centralized heat pump systems which I mentioned last time.

Two of these systems are under development and the buildings effected are almost

complete. One is finished, it is the control data center in Brussels and it is

equipped with a heat pump system with recovery systems. It has been in operation

since the first of January of this year. Unfortunately, there is no data on the first

18
year of experience. Perhaps it will be available at the next meeting. The second

project, a swimming pool equipped with a solar energy system, storage and heat pumps

is almost completed near Brussels. The third project is a general study involving

every important energy vector and is to be carried on in various universities. This

study will be completed in two years, including solar energy, gasification etc. Our

department is dealing with heating for cities, total energy systems, etc.

The Netherlands (Mr. Van den Bergh)

The Stichling Energy Foundation is gathering information which might be of

interest to the MIUS group. The Foundation is gathering information on total energy

projects at five or six hospitals. There are three projects for sewage treatment and

three on dual fuel energy and total energy systems. There are on-going projects for

greenhouses. A total energy installation at one of the hospitals was found to have

an overall thermal efficiency of about 70.2% and an average load factor of 56.6%.

The thermal efficiency of the combined engine generator set was 44.8%. An older

installation had an efficiency of 60.6%, and a load factor of about 50%. Completed

Project Summary Forms will be forwarded for inclusion in the catalog. The greenhouse

is being used in the winter season to improve growth of the flowers, etc.

The energy consumption is about 500,000 kilowatt hours per year for lighting.

If electric heat is considered it would consume an additional 100,000 cubic meters

of natural gas using conventional means of power generation. If you supply this heat

from a total energy installation, only 20,000 cubic meters of natural gas is consumed.

A comparison between two total energy installations installed in hospitals is available. The net savings will be 120,000 guilders per year out of a total cost of 500,000

guilders by using a total energy system.

19
France (Mr. Gjebine)

Mr. Grjebine raised the question whether the two project outputs (catalog and

standard methodology) are fulfilling entirely the need of the participating countries.!:

He stressed the importance of having the right type of information available in order

that authorities at the state, regional and administrative levels could be convinced

of the significance and importance of integrated energy systems (MIUS) . He stressed

the need for a catalog of component parts to identify the existing technology etc,

within the various countries. Mr. Grjebine further suggested that we develop a CCMS

relationship with the press because the resources that could be available to us through;

T.V., radio, newspapers, magazines etc. are not now available to us.

Mr. Grjebine further discussed the importance of acquiring appropriate experts

to consult or have testify before parlimentary commissions etc. He described legislation, which he supported, which could obligate customers to hook-up to district heating where it is available if it is cheaper than conventional heating. Otherwise they

would pay a penalty tax similar to that now in effect concerning sewage collection etc.

j The National Committee has recommended that all options be kept open for the ft

future such as, nuclear plants be constructed with capability of using the waste heat

for hot water heating networks, and that turbines be constructed that are capable of

providing 70-90 degree heating when needed, and that electric houses have hot water

. H systems in order that they can be converted to hot water system networks (district

heating) . The Commission has proposed that seven areas be studied for the application

of programs, such as MIUS. The interparlimentary groups will launch studies on a more

global scale. Mr. Grejbine next discussed some of the cost incentives of electricity

and heating.

ERDA (Mr. Cavros)

Mr. Cavros discussed the need for institutional innovation and the importance of the energy industry, utilities, municipalities or any other public body accustomi;

to long term write off of investments, adopting the MIUS concepts. For example, the

110
builder may have certain burdens and operating rules of return on his investment

which may not fit exactly the nature of utility systems such as the MIUS. He may

want to recover his monety quickly, and it's not the nature of the system to do that.

ERDA has one project, an international project with the National Energy Council of

Greece, which is addressing the problem of how does a team of urban planners, city

1

• designers and energy specialists or engineers get together for the first time to design

I a energy efficient human settlement? A Greek island has been choosen as a test case

site. Work is in progress to create the capability of analyzing and matching the end

|

'

I use of utility services with the conversion and delivery of services. The Integrated

I Community Energy Systems (ICES) program at ERDA, is investigating the use of coal.

| This program also includes a research and development program to foster the use of

advancing technologies in integrated systems.

| Using today's technology, ERDA has one project that will be conducting

feasibility studies of six particular sites where MIUS type of integrated community

energy systems can be built. The project does not necessarily include wastewater and

water treatment. This often has institutional constraints. Proposals from investorowned and municipally-owned utility systems and large private developers have been

received. Not only will the design be evaluated, but also the potential for success

by the sponsoring team. ERDA hopes to select three different kinds of teams in order

to test the institutional problems peculiar to each. Another interest is the Community

Annual Service Energy System which could use a commercially available ice making machine

and large storage ponds or large storage areas of water which are converted to ice

or very cold water by heat extraction in the winter and then in the summer melting

the ice for cooling purposes. ERDA has a contract with the Swedes, who have a computer

program to test the economic and technical feasibility of district heating. They will

be evaluating a few sites in the U.S. approaching large utility companies to see how

district heating on a large scale can best be demonstrated through a feasibility study.

The community systems branch is cooperating with the ERDA's nuclear research activity

to explore the waste heat potential from nuclear plants.

Ill
There is another project which involves the retrofit or redesign of an existing

power plant for district heating. We are looking for opportunities where district

heating can become economically feasible immediately. We have another international

project with the Federal Republic of Germany, an IEA Project, which involves a

heating system for apartments using heat pumps for extracting heat from a nearby

canal in Esslingen.

There is a standby oil heating system that will be compared with the heat pump

system. ERDA in its community systems programs is pursuing the concept of energy

master planning. The idea is to bring together the utility companies, the municipal

consumers, the private developer i.e. all the players who supply and consume energy

in a mutual effort to conserve energy instead of each serving his interest first.

To address the problems of energy within each community is to assist these communitie

We are developing methodology for a comprehensive community energy management, hopefully enlisting local governments to work with the problem and at the same time prepare the market to accept the technologies being developed.

NOTE: Mr. Harris informed the committee that another sub-project of the CCMS work

on thermal energy led by France is looking at the cost of heat transmission and

expects to have a final draft in 3 to 4 months. This could be made available to the

project. The computer program which is being worked out by Northest Batelle is being

:

131

demonstrated at 3 sites on a western U.S. site, Iceland (where actual costs are

known) and in France (several locations). j'

The update of projects by Dr. Plantikow (RFG) , Mr. Renghold (Sweden), and

Mr. Campanile (Italy) where deferred to the second day (Dec. 8). J

1

TASK 1 DATA FORMAT COMMITTEE

(Refer to the agenda of the fourth meeting, Attachment 1, page 2, Work Material

for Data Format Committee, Attachment 3, Summary of Project Summary Forms, Attachment 4,

and "Definition of MIUS Type of Project", Attachment 5). A paper containing work materia

for the Data Format Committee, Attachment 3, the First Draft of completed Project Summary

112
j

l!

I

;

|

i

Forms for the International Project Catalog, and a paper entitled "Definitions of MIUS

type of Projects", Attachment 5, were handed out.

As chairman of the Data Format Committee, Mr. Phillips urged that participants

submit their completed Project Summary Forms for the catalog. As a matter of record,

(Refer to Summary of Project Summary Forms, Attachment 4) 50 forms were received from

the U.S. and 3 from other countries. Mr. Phillips asked that completed Project Summary Foi

be submitted to the Data Format Committee via the Secretariat within three months and

that the catalog be submitted at the next meeting in about 6 months or more for appoval.

A discussion followed on the guidelines for including projects in the catalog.

Questions raised were: should projects be included on the basis of data available,

what is the minimum amount of data from a project that would be of value, are items

such as cost of operation, cost for installation, the kilowatt hours or pounds of

isteam produced sufficient information and how about cost of processing waste, and

jhow much would it cost the city to process the waste without a MIUS?

From this discussion a consensus was achieved on the following: If the sponsor

of a project stated that there would be no data, the project would not be included,

jif some data was available and this particular project was not similar to many other

projects reporting data, then the project would be included. Obviously, projects with

more than casual data would be included?

Also raised was the question of - should a project limited to a better generator,

engine, or boiler, or other component be included. The consensus was only if the

component is in fact integrated in some way and/or offers strong potential to effect

the welfare of integrated systems.

Agenda

Item a Mr. Harris suggested that the Glossary of Special Terms and the Catalog

be an appendix of the final report. He reported that all CCMS publications

are placed in the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) , located in

Springfield, Va.

,

and thus are available to anyone. The publications on

energy arc usually put into Oak Ridge system as well as the NTIS system.

113
Agenda

Item b

The European mechanisms for getting CCMS reports is usually through NATO.

Mr. Folan stated that final reports are distributed to each country's

delegation. Concerning distribution of reports, Mr. Harris related

l that the audience should bo recommended by the CCMS-MIUS committee.

Initial distribution is usually 1000, with a second distribution also

around 1000. Mr. Harris also stated that a final draft document should

be submitted to th? plenary for approval in lieu of the final published

document which of course should follow thereafter. Since the Fall

plenary is Oct. 77, Mr. Folan and Mr. Harris recommended that the catalog

and final report be submitted to the Plenary for approval about Sept. 1,

1977. This would necessitate approval of the catalog and component parts

of the final report such as recommendations to CCMS, research needs, and

standard methodology by the next meeting.

Mr. Harris suggested that Mr. Grj ebine and Mr. Cavros draft a report

on the difficulties and the opportunities with integrated utility systems

face in participating countries entitled "Incentives and Barriers for

the MIUS System". They both agreed. Mr. Cavros agreed to be the Chairman,

Mr. Grjebine agreed to serve on the committee, and Mr. Mangialajo offered

to also serve. It was agreed that this report should be distributed prior

to the next meeting in order that participants could prepare for its

review and approval at the next meeting.

Concerning approval of the Project Summary Form Mr. van den Bergh

suggested that a box be added to identify the owner of the plant.

It was decided that the instructions for completing the form would

be changed to instruct one to use the box for the sponsoring organization for entering the owner also. Mr. Mangialajo asked if the catalog

should include name of the industrial plants that were utilizing combined po

and heat generation. Mr. Phillips agreed that if it could add to

integrated systems technology, that they should be considered for

114
inclusion in the catalog.

Agenda

Item c

Agenda

Item d

Agenda

Item e

Agenda

Item f&g

Agenda

Item h&i

It was agreed that the catalog would be furnished in loose-leaf

form.

It was agreed that: (a) the catalog would not have copyrights,

(b) that persons contributing to the catalog would be advised

that their material was for publication, (c) the initial printing

would be about 1000, and copies would be made available via NTIS

possibly GPO (U.S. Gov’t Printing Office).

In review of the first draft of the catalog, Mr. Phillips pointed

out that a summary of the 53 projects was included in the

front of the draft. He also called the committee's attention to

the paper "Definition of a MIUS Type of Project" . He also anticipated

more than 30 European projects.

Project Progress/Evaluation Report. Mr. van den Bergh suggested

that Item 12 include the type and thickness of insulation rather

that indicating the gross heat rate. In Item lie expand to include

types of wastewater treatment. For example in Part III both terms

sewage and wastewater are used.

Concerning the Project Progress Evaluation Report, no specific

recommendations were made. It was suggested, however, that this

report would serve to update the catalog and that this should receive

the committe's recommendation . It was agreed that the future

work on the Project Progress/Evaluation Report might possibility

fall within IEA's energy cascading work which is looking at energy

1

recovery and reuse.

115
P roject Update

Sweden (Mr. Renghold)

1

I

Mr. Renghold explained that after understanding what MIUS (the concept) is he

could now identify some projects in Sweden as being MIUS type of projects. There are a

number of MIUS type activities such as the municipal heating systems with contemporary

production of heat and power. Mr. Renghold pointed out that in Sweden there is little

research on MIUS type of projects as they are a common technology in Sweden, (about 20-30 a

years). Thirty to forty large cities have MIUS type of projects. All of Sweden's big cite:

I are heated with these municipal heating systems (District Heating). Vasteras with 80,000

inhabitants is almost totally heated by this method. Research, generally, is limited

due to financial resources. The economics of MIUS types of systems (district heating,

combined power and heating) are known and controlled. Although, Sweden and Scandinavia

have MIUS type of systems, very few follow the complete MIUS concept.

Mr. Renghold submitted a Project Summary Form for the 12MW TE diesel plant

serving Vasteras.

fl

I

i

General Discussion

Mr. Harris pointed out that the CCMS-MIUS Project got much of its inspiration from Sweden's existing technology in utilities, which other countries would like

to share. Mr. Cavros pointed out that Sweden had solved the institutional problems

while other countries have not.

The idea of a catalog of component parts was again discussed in view of

Sweden's technology such as the transportation of low grade heat up to 80 kilometers.

Mr. Rothenberg pointed out that at JCTE risen-bonded fiber glass reinforced pipe

saved $30,000 over steel and this technology should be included in such a catalog.

I

If]

ifl

l

116
II

SECOND DAY , DECEMBER 8, 1977

The meeting was convened Dec. 8, 1977, at 9:00 by the Chairman. He turned the

meeting over to Mr. John Knobbout , Chairman of the Measurement Technology Committee.

TASK 2 MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

Mr. Knobbout handed out an outline of the methodology (layout of report: measurt ing systems for a MIUS) and reviewed the accomplishments and content of discussion

at the last CCMS-MIUS Project meeting, where measurements were discussed extensively.

Discussed were views on the possibility and usefulness of measurements, what should

| be included and what should not be included, a typical measurement system, a system

approach to a measurement system, and borders of the system. It was agreed that peri forming measurements In practice is not simple and there are different ’.levels of measurement required. It was concluded at t:he last meeting that a new draft should be prepared.

jFor, this discussion the chairman presented an outline of the report for discussion

I and comment. The significant comments and discussion are in the succeeding paragraphs.

In para 1, Project Comparison with Different Goals, Mr. Phillips pointed out

that care should be given to comparing real data with an idealized model as the real

'data is collected under operating constraints such as mechanical problems, breakdowns,

outages, malfunctioning components, instrumentation which can not reach the ideal model's

performance

In para 2, several purposes of the report were highlighted such as, to serve as

a basis for information exchange with a standardized format, identify minimum data

necessary to support specific comparisons, serve as guidelines for how to measure and

report the results, present general experience with the MIUS system, and to guide

potential user's of a MIUS etc. It was agreed that the data acquisition system should

I;be specified, not described, and that the various standards in different countries

should not be included.

117
-!

In para 3, Approach of the Technical Problem, the discussion centered around the

minimum measurement, levels of measurement, not the application of the measurement

(included later in report). It was agreed that there should be a system oriented

approach

In para 4, Subsystem Approach, it was pointed out that optimization of subsystem

performance requires subsystem measurements. It was suggested that the parameters to

be monitored could be listed in a table.

In para 5, Measurements, Mr. Knobbout suggested that instrumentation is probably

a better title. In the discussion of repeatability and reliability of the field measurements a concern was expressed that the requirements and accuracies specified be within

the range of available instrumentation at an acceptable price when the measurement

technique and specific type of measurement is being considered. For example, two

quartz resistance thermometers on a high temperature line will cost about $2000

($1000 each) whereas a thermocouple wire with a proper instrument measurement the voltage differential will cost far less for equivalent precision.

In para 6A, Approach in Practice, a discussion developed on seasonal efficiency

and how one factors or considers the COP in the overall efficiency. Mr. Cavros stated

that ERDA is considering using a "fuel effectiveness ratio" that would be based on -

an input of one energy unit to an output of the same or equivalent energy unit.

. The consensus was that the methodology of taking and reporting data does not describe

| how to analyze plant performance, but merely what data is needed and generally how to

acquire it.

In para 6B - Subsystem Inputs and Outputs, the discussion centered around the difficul

of assessing black box efficiency if the boundaries are unknown. Depending upon the user'

needs and his building and equipment configuration greater user demand whether frugal or

wasteful could result in higher plant efficiency. Thus energy conservation practiced by t

user could lower the plant efficiency and vice versa. There was a concensus that information is needed on the dynamics of the building and the user's habits. The end-use

118 
1 svstems should be considered part of the comprehensive energy system. Thus ideally

| the user buildings and MIUS should be designed as an overall system. Institutionally

i this may prove difficult.

In para 7, Data Acquisition System (DAS) - it was agreed that there are many

|

j

; ways to acquire data from "clipboard and pencil" to sophisticated "computerized data

j acquisition systems" with various costs. This section should discuss the range of comDle

general benefits, general costs, a desirable degree of accuracy for system analysis, and

• methods of data reduction. DAS' can differ depending upon program objectives, measurej ment objectives, management practices and available funds.

The following schedule was set for the Measurement Technology Committee's standard

j methodology draft material:

1) Submit draft material to chairman Mid-March 1977

for inclusion in second draft.

2) Distribute second draft to participates April 30, 1977

for review prior to July 77 meeting.

3) Approval of second draft of July 77 July 12-14, 77

meeting for inclusion is final report.

The following assignments were made to assist the committee in preparing the

second draft of the standard methodology:

1) Introduction - Mr. Phillips, U.S.

2) Purpose - Mr. Rothenberg, U.S.

3) Approach of Technical Problems !> - Not assigned

4) Subsystem

5) Instrumentation (The measurements) - Mr. Knobbout , The Netherlands

6) Approach in Practice - Mr. Phillips, U.S.

and Mr. Rothenberg, U.S.

7) Data Acquisition System - Mr. Phillips, U.S.

(also Analysis Techniques)

8) Influence Objectives - Mr. Knobbout, The Netherlands

119
Mr. Crjebine of France was asked by the Chairman to serve as a replacement for

i

:

Mr. Simon on the Measurement Technology Committee. He agreed. Mr. Knobbout reviewed

the schedule then closed his committee meeting. L

I

I CONTINUATION OF UPDATE OF MI US TYPE OF PROJECTS

W. Germany (Mr. Jank)

Mr. Jank supplied participants with a copy of "Energy R&D Program of the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany - Annual Report 1975". The book includes

about 400 projects, 61 of which are in the field of energy conservation with which

1 Dr. Plantikow is associated. Several district heating studies by different industries

l have been made. The project summaries are on pages 437 - 452. These studies were to

assess the potential savings of such systems and cost about 12 million marks to perform.

Four or five of the studies are complete. The main study is in progress. The study

will be completed in Jan 77 and will cover technical and political (institutional) problem?

I The studies are mostly of real existing systems to examine the benefits of using rejected

heat. The results indicate a savings of 200 million marks by 1990 by using these systems

for the entire country. The payoff would be between 10-15 years.

Mr. Jank also described a project dealing with energy storage by use of a large

lake. An experimental lake (pilot lake) to study insulation is underway. The hot

water lake will be between 90-95 degrees Centigrade.

i Perhaps the most important and interesting project is the Block Heat Power

Station. It has a gas engine, produces 620 KW of electrical power and produces heat

! for 260 dwelling units, possibly 300-400, in the area adjacent to the plant. It

became operational in early 1976 and will continue until the end of 1978.

Another project is the Modern community with new energy and heating systems.

The report is complete and available in the German language. The short version is

available in English.

Another project is the Agrotherm where rejected heat from a nuclear plant is

reclaimed and piped beneath an agricultural area. The warm soil is hoped to be

I 1

1 a benefit to crop production.

120 i
TASK 3 RESEARCH NEEDS COMMITTEE

Mr. Michel, Chairman of the Research Needs Committee presented a general framework for combined production of heat and electricity by drawing a diagram on the blackboard (See Figure 1). Problems will be presented in three parts, production distribution and consumers. There are short term; medium and long term problems. These fall

into categories such as fundamental research, technological research and development,

component and system research, economics, institutional, and organizational.

In combined systems for heat and power, research is needed on turbines that can

adapt to both power and heat production. It would be interesting to

establish a dynamic model of this turbine using calculations to determine parameters

and their transfer functions and also to analyze the possibility of partial oxidization.

Also it would be interesting to gather data on the efficiency of part-loads for the

classical boilers. There is a lack of knowledge about the use of plastic pipes

for district heating. Obviously planners will use new technologies only if well tested

and proven. There is a need for better control of systems which recognize instantaneous

changes in electrical power demand. Reliability is another problem which may be studied

on the basis of component failure probability.

It would be very important to develop a common methodology for evaluating large

scale projects economically over a period of twenty years for example. It is important

to consider the dynamic approach being able to answer questions concerning inflation

and interest. We need dynamic programming as oppose to linear programming to provide

a base for optimizing and analyzing systems in complex networks. It is important to

work with the dynamics of the distribution networks to make coincident the peaks of

electricity and heat.

END OF MEETING

THIRD DAY, DECEMBER 9, 1977

° Tour of KFA

° Trip to Duisberg and tour of August Thyssen Hutte

121
Research Needs

Types of Problems

a. Short Term

Medium Term

Long Term

b. Fundamental and Technological

Research

c. Res.&Dev.

C^, Components

C2» Systems

A PROD

Al Cb E/Q

°Steam

°Gas plus second steamsysten 0Diese±/gas engine

A2 Q (Heat Only)

°Classical steam

°Nuc lear ( sm . bldg .

°Heat Pumps (lg. ism.

d. Economics

e. Institutional Problems / Mi sc

B. Dist. System

El Transport

B2 Dist.

B3 Stor.

Residen

Comm'l

Ind.

Zone

Absorp

tion

Lt. Dist'

Network

r HT

Distrib

Network

C. Consumer

Cl Ind.

Process & Heat

C2 Com ' 1 & Residential

HPS=Heating Power station

PS = Power Station

HP = Heating Plant/Heat Pump

Figure 1 FRAMEWORK ON

RESEARCH NEEDS

STOR = Storage

Ind = Industry

PE = Primary Energy

122

!i
COMMITTEE FOR THE CHALLENGES OF MODERN SOCIETY

TUESDAY

0900

1045

1215

RATIONAL USE OF ENERGY

MODULAR INTEGRATED UTILITY SYSTEM (MIUS)

CONFIRMATION NOTICE OF

SCHFDliTZD^S£TTNG“

Date: Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday

December 7-9, 1976

Place: Kernforschungsanlage , Juelich (KFA)

(Nuclear Research Center)

Juelich, Federal Republic of Germany

Host: Dr. U. Plantikow

Meeting Chairman: C.W. Phillips

AGENDA

December 7

CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTION

Welcome to Federal Republic of Germany and the Kernf orschunganlage

Juelich (Nuclear Research Center), Dr. Prof, K.H. Beckurts,

Scientific Director Kernforschungsanlage Juelich

Update of CCMF. Activities, Goals and Objectives, F, Allen Harris,

Special Assistant, U.S, CCMS Delegation

Update of CCMS-MIUS Project Activities, J.H.Kothenberg, Manager,

U.S, HUD-MIUS Program (HUD is the U,S, Department of Housing and

Urban Development)

Technical Presentation - U.S. IIUD-MIUS Program.

Mr. J.IT.Rothenberg, Manager, U.S. HUD-MIUS Program, will describe the

current status of the HUD-MIUS Program, including the Total Energy plain

at Jersey City, New Jersey. The MIUS Demonstration at St. Charles, Md

.

and other related projects.

UP DATE OF INTE GRATED UTIL ITY SYSTEM'S PROJECTS

Experts in attendance are requested to present brief reports

of on-going projects in their respective countries. (Notice

to presentors: Written reports for distribution to attendees

will be helpful).

LUNCH (COFFEE BREAK at 1030 am)

123
TUESJ

AY, Docomber 7 (Co n

inned ) 1315 TASK 1 DATA FORMAT COMMITTEE - C.W. Phillips (USA), Chairman

Discussion and reviev/ for approval

a. Presentation of CCMS Policy on Production of Documents

and Recommendations on Type of Document and Production

for Catalog.

(1) Glossary of Special Terms

(2) Catalog

(3) Final Report

b. Approval of Project Summary Form, associated instructions

and CCMS General Information

c. Committee Recomendat ion for system and structure of

International Project Catalog

d. Committee Recommendations for catalog-on distribution

methods and audiences, for copyright, number of copies

to be printed, etc.

e. Review of Catalog Progress

(1) Number of projects reported

(2) Countries responding

(3) Type of projects being reported

(4) Usefulness to MIUS related activities

(5) Appropriateness of response

(6) Completeness of response

(7) Recommendations etc. (Projects to include or reject, any last minute changes to Project

Summary Forms changes in timetable and milestones)

f. Report on Test results of Project Progress/Evaluation

Report Form

g.

Committee Recommendations on Changes and Improvements

to Project Progress/Evaluation Report

h. Recommendations on Methodology for supplying Project

Progress/Evaluation Reports to participants

i. Milestones and Schedule for Completing Project Progress/

Evaluation Reporting System Task

All CCMS-illUS Project experts are requested to participate in the Data

Format Committee work session.

[24
T UESDAY, December 7 (Cent: inu ecl

)_ DATA FORMAT COMMITTEE - Canada (K. R. Solvason)

Italy (M.Mangialajo)

Nether lands (J.W.H.Van den Bergh)

United Kingdom (P.J. O’Neill)

United States (C .W. Phillips)

1645 ADJOURN DATA FORMAT COMMITTEE SESSION

SOCIAL HOUR AND DINNER - Courtesy of the Kernf orschungsanlage Juelich

WEDNESDAY, December 8, 1976

0500 TASK 2 -MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

Discussion and Review of:

- J.A.Knobbout (The Netherl

Chair ma

I a. General update of Committee goals and objectives

b. Report on Task Force Activity to Incorporate Comments

and Improve First Draft of Standard Methodology for

Reporting performance of systems and taking of and

reporting of data

(Task Force members are: France (M, Simon), Federal Republic

Germany (H. Klein or F. Richter), Netherlands (J,A,Knobbout)

and Sweden (U. Renghold)

c. Recommendations (presentation of second draft) on; .

(1) MIUS subsystem functions

(2) Minimum data items for reporting performance of

systems for both an operating system and a research/

experimental facilities being demonstrated

(3) Accuracy of data items desired

(4) Measurement Methodology Guidelines (procedures,

techniques, measuring devices, new measurement technology,

sampling requirements, etc,

d. Milestones and Schedule for Completing Standard Methodology

for reporting performance of systems

All CCMS-MIUS Project experts are requested to participate in the

Measurement Technology Committee work session.

MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

France (M. Simon)

Federal Republic of Germany (H. Klein or F, Richter)

Netherlands (J . A.Knobbout)

Sweden ( ga Renghold)

United States (C.LT

. Phillips)

125
1215

13] 5

14 30

1530

1630

1700

WF.F)N r.S I )AY , J)e e onib'- r 8 ( Con t i n

< »c!

)

LUNCH (COFFEE BREAK at 1030 am and 1500 pm)

Continuation of Task 2 MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

TASK 3 RESEARCH NEEDS COMM ITTEE

Discussion and Review of:

v J.A, Michel (Belgium) , Chairman

a. Committee Report on the identification of needs for research

in support of Integrated Utility System Technology

b. Additional Recommendations by participants.

(All participants arc requested to assist the committee in

identifying areas of integrated utility systems technology

and processes which need basis or applied research. The

goal of this session is for the committee to prepare a prioritized

list of research needs in integrated utility system technology

for dissemination to CCMS-MIUS Project participants and to the CCMS

Plenary in 1977.

c. Schedule remaining work for the completing report to the CCMS

Plenary in 1977.

All participants are requested to provide input to the Research Meeds

Coimnic cee

RESEARCH COMMITTEE

Belgium (J. A. Michel)

Federal Republic of Germany (W.Piller or Dr. H. Klein)

United States (S.Cavros)

COMMITTEE SUMMARIES /ACTION

Data Format Committee, Task 1

Measurement Technology Committee, Task 2 Research Meeds Committee, Task 3 - Items resulting from Task 1 (Dec. 7) and Task 2 and 3 (Dec, 8) requiring CCMS-MIUS Project Action

OTHER BUSINESS

New Project Tasks

Iuture_ CCMS-MIUS Project Schedule

Date and Place for Next Meeting

[Final Arrangements for December 9 Technical Visits/Tours

ADJOURN FOR THE DAY

SOCIAL HOUR AMD DINNER OPEN
- 5-

THURSDAY

0900

1130

L700

, December 9, 1976

TECHNICAL TOUR OF KERNFORS CHUNGS ANLAOE JUELICH

(Nuclear Research Center)

The itinerary for visiting the KFA Laboratories will be determined

on the first day of the project meeting, Tuesday, 9 December 1976.

Participants in attendance will be given an opportunity to recommend

the types of projects they wish to visit.

TECHNICAL TOUR TO DUIf BERG (Bus Trip)

Participants may journey to Europe’s largest inland harbour in

Duisberg (70 kilometers from Juelich) with LUNCH at the August

Thys sen Hutte. The government-supported Agrotherm-proj ect - a project using a part of the waste heat of a 500 MW power plant

for agricultural purposes will be visited.

NOTE: On the return trip to Juelich the bus can stop at the Cologne and

Dusseldorf airports. Scheduled time for return to Juelich is

approximately 1700 hours.

ARRIVE BACK AT JUELICH /AACHEN - END OF MEETING

Complete information on arrangements (reservations) for housing

accommodations near the meeting place and transportation to the

hotel and meeting place will be provided to you with an invitation

from the Kernforschungsanlage Juelich which you should have received by thi

time. Accommodations will be at hotels in Aachen. Rooms can be reserved

by returning the Hotel Reservation Form attached to the invitation.

If you have not received the Hotel Reservation Form, or if you need

any assistance with accommodations or transportation, you may contact

Mr. Ortwin Renn, head of Tagungsburo, KFA, telephone 06/02461/614662.

You may also contact Dr. Plantikow (telephone 06/02461/614621) or

Dr. Reinhard Janie at KFA (telephone 06/02461/613269). The KFA telex

number is 833556kfad.

If you have any questions concerning the CCMS-MIUS Project, please get

in touch with the Project Chairman, C .W. Phil lips , Room A146, Bldg. 223,

National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D. C. 20234, U.S.A., telephone

202-921-3741. The NBS telex number is 89-8493.

127

ATTACHMENT 2

First Draft: JCTE Part of CCMS 12/1/76

FOR CCMS MIUS DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR PUBLICAT ION

OR REFERENCE

J. H.Rothenberg, December, 1976

HUD-MIUS PROGRAM

Jersey City Total Energy Demonstration

The Jersey City Total Energy Demonstration is a HUD-MIUS Project which

has been discussed at previous CCMS meetings. The 6 1/2 acre (2.4 hectare)site is

located in Jersey City, New Jersey across the Hudson River from New York City.

This site has four apartment buildings containing 485 apartments, a

commercial building, a school, a swimming pool, and a central equipment

building. The central equipment building houses an automatic total energy

plant which supplies electric power, hot water, and chilled water required

by the site.

The plant has been serving the site since January, 1974. In support NBS* of HUD, ** has instrumented this total energy plant so that its performance

can be evaluated. Since April of 1975, plant data has been recorded, and

beginning November 1975, utilities to the remaining buildings have been

instrumented and preliminary data recorded as construction and calibration

* HUD-MIUS stands for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentModular Integrated Utility System

** U.S. National Bureau of Standards

129
schedules permitted. Prior to May, 1976, fuel usage was determined by

total delivery to the site, with relative use between engines and boilers

determined by calculation. Beginning with May, 1976, we now have six

months of direct measured fuel data showing separate usage by engines and

boilers. These data will be discussed later in my talk.

The Jersey City Total Energy Plant has five diesel engine-generator

sets with heat recovery. In operation, each of these units produce between

300 and 500 kilowatts (maximum kw output is 640). The peak site and plant

loads can be handled at any time by three of these units, leaving one unit

available for maintenance and one unit as a standy-by. Heat is recovered

from the jackets and exhausts of each engine. The electrical efficiency

of these engine-generators is 32% as determined by precise fuel

and kwh measurement. The electrical-plus-heat-recovery efficiency is

slightly above 60%.

Figure 1 is a schematic of the plant. Thermal energy recovered from

the engines is used to produce site hot water and to operate two 546

ton (1920 kw) absorption chillers. A primary hot water loop, which is

10 inch pipe carrying 11,000 pounds (5000 kg) per minute of water at 180°

to 220° F (82 to 104°C) transfers recovered engine heat to the site loop

heat exchangers and chillers. Two 400 horsepower (3920 kw) fire tube

boilers are also in the primary loop to provide supplemental heat when

needed. In the rare event that more recovered heat is produced than

needed, dry coolers can release primary heat to the atmosphere. An

emergency heat exchanger using raw city water provides redundant

back up to the dry coolers to assure the primary loop can adequately cool

130
3

the engines. Although these heat dumping units are rarely used in normal

operation, they allow portions of the secondary distribution systems to

be turned off for maintenance without shutting down the primary system

with resultant loss of the electrical power.

Figure 2 is a computer plot from site recorded data showing the

seasonal output of electtical power from generators that is required for

site power and for HVAC use. The graph shows that site demands have a + 25%

diurnal variation but mean levels are relatively constant year-round.

Electrical power required by the HVAC equipment in the central equipment

building varies considerably throughout the year. During the summer the

HVAC system requires electrical power to run the accessories for the

absorption chillers and the cooling tower fans and pumps.

Figure 3 shows the typical site thermal demand for hot water and

chilled water during the four seasons. Site hot water is used both

for space heating and for domestic hot water production, so that even in

mid-summer hot water from the CEB is required by the site. Note that the

site thermal energy demands in mid-winter for hot water are about double

the demands in mid-summer for chilled water.

The site thermal demands require heat from the primary loop. Hot water

demands are met by site heat exchangers in the plant which transfer thermal

energy from the primary loop to a secondary hot water loop for site

distribuiton to the several buildings. Chilled water demands are met by

two absorption chillers operated by primary loop thermal energy. Although

mid-summer site chilled water thermal demands are approximately half of

131
I

I

I

1

132
lancH i±v*cni>

133

OCTOBER

1975

FEBRUARY

1976

MAY

1976

AUGUST

1976

135

FIGURE
mid-winter site hot water thermal demands, more heat is required from the

plant primary hot water loop in summer than in winter to meet the demands

of the chillers and primary site exchangers.

1

Heat is supplied to the primary loop to meet site exchanger and chiller

demands from engine heat recovery and from the boilers. This graph in

Figure 4 compares the thermal energy added in the primary loop by engine

recovery and by the boilers. Heat recovered from the engines is directly

related to electrical loads on the engine-generators. Thus, like electrical

power production, engine heat recovery shows a diurnal variation but is

relatively constant year-round with some increase in summer due to the increase

in H2AC electrical loads. In summer and in winter the boilers supply about

2/3 of the primary hot water loop energy. However, in the milder spring

and fall months, the boilers supply less thermal energy than the engines.

The relationship between recovered engine heat and the site and chiller

primary hot water demands is shown in Figure 5. In summer and winter, engine

heat recovery eauals about 1/3 of the site and chiller heat requirements.

In the spring and fall engine heat recovery supplies almost all required ' heat. Note that on several of the days shown here, recovered engine heat

exceeded the heat required by the site. If recovered heat is greater than the

heat required by the site plus the primary loop losses then the dry coolers

dispose of the excess heat. Presently the excess heat is a relatively small

amount and does not justify the addition of thermal storage components to

the Jersey City Total Energy Plant.

Figure 6 reports the monthly performance of the Jersey City Total Energy

Plant from May 1976 through October 1976. This chart also contains a

ENGINEERING

PERFORMANCE

DATA *

TOTAL

ENERGY

SYSTEM,

JERSEY

CITY,

N.J

XX CM *

CM CTV • • X • VO CTV CM CM CO P“* VO r— CM o co P^

vo co LO r-» VO co CO VO r>* CM

CO co CTv CO o LO LO VO

CM

m Osl CM CTV LO LO CM o VO cn vo o VO i

MCO s 32

VO • • X • o P"* nr CO 2 • CTV r-% CM co

O vr> in CVi VO CTV VO CO vo 00 vO

VO co pa VO LO CO VO

CL §VO r— CM o CM

<u VO co CTV tt* on CO VO H X CTV lO CM CO CO r— • • X • * «r— vo o o CM X o CTV CTV CM r— LT> §

CO CO *T CM CTV r— CO vo CO co > • o CTV VO CTV O o co «o

ctv CM KT VO CM CO CO CM 3 VO VO VO pa» OS <C CO vo a* -Q

r-«

MX r>* r—

CM nr •tr* VO • • X • 5 o o o CTV CM CTV Q CM CM CTV CM

VO CTV CO CO

O CO CO VO 00 CM ns >» O LO c* VO o • CO X r-* r— r— vo CM CM VO CTV «3 3 CM co VO co CTV no

*3 00 vo

<1> 4->

H

X VO

to vo co i- VO • • X • 3

r>. § o CO CO VO

x CM o in

O o LO co o CO vo co CO U

<u

X CM CTV

x «o c CO LO CM o r—

CM 00 3 cn lO VO O os -3 to <*” u M S

n*-

a • • X • VO § g LO £

CTV

CTV oCO o g

CM

CO 5

COx vo •

1/1 VO X CO CTV CO LO CTV c

>v 00 pa r— CO vo co CTV o a

cn to

vo nr

XuV

CLE

ns

s-<9CL

>t

k o k o ^4. to as u no to o > ^4 as o r“ o <9 k M u O O <9 • M as C>4- C Z CTV . ClL C k C L L k zi <9 >» •4- X E LO 00 o as o => X CTV o X VI O s o X X X X CO 

- c <9 z as O 3 <o _ CO as as X <9 r— S 2 S'- t/t z E X X U QJ as V0 X u as X <9 TJ c X X X k « as z x >, O no

4) ^4 VO

O t/t 0) c LO

XX Ut

X as

X >*3= >»x 4—

X 4— >1-*- n~» >»

ns 4) on on <a CTV

k

X on >— Z p—

V.

X >. 2 c o 3 3

OS •n— >v «- ?o UJX . >v >vX t/V ~3 e L0 k ns k T3 <9 vn <9 u z z as 5 T3 S a» J5 k ,

o e e o >» E C S«— o as ns as o no 4. • Z n- O k e- CTV k <v- as c r*4 k O k •*- X a> V/ • X o k « O •o ol as CL f o V) o 2 CTV X V on c_> T3 • t/V f—• as X 3 IA O o l/t E as as k ^4 X CT* k Z

Q. 3 o X o x

k c as a>

XX as as Ml >V > <3 k o as •r- —

, -* >t CC r—

kXX > CTV 44.

k

k o •9 <9

<o c c o C o o o c X 3 u 5 T> O a o u LU CO <D X X as as JE—

<9 e o a» as •*— as (/) <9 <9 3 0 • no (9

w O.

X

x

—

X

X Of >» >v

k

k o X V/V •3

4-»

u uvoO LS

XX as as •pwX

C i— as o <9 3 0 <9 3 X p» e e X o r- o a z c 0) nj 5 kT3n- k T3 <9 T3 T3 0) <D as X <_s ns 4- ctv x •*- (J jE X o X O OS as as o o X C *-> '— LU 4" S X k • X k z ut v/v U. t • k o a. k —

LU CL LU CL z z as ask as 4—

kk

X 3 r—

p»- c c as

x o as . 09

4-> <o o c_>

x as v—x as . p~~ <o 4— 4— ^ - — vn

X

X as x ns jC co ns _c 4-> as as 4-> CTV cn 4 o z o X o CL a> x —

as

x o 3 3 o C c o -C 9<a. 0 H* LU z z h— X X H- X X CO < z

vOWgoM I

*Editor's

Note:

The

preliminary

data

in

this

table

varies

slightly

from

the

firm

data

which

will

appear

in

the

Interim

Report.

See

editor's

note

on

Page

5.

Please

do

not

use

this

preliminary

data

for

reference.
5

comparison of the JCTE fuel consumption with the calculated energy

consumption of the site if electricity were purchased from the local

utility; hot water were supplied by absorption chillers in a central

plant. The local utilities efficiency in converting fuel to delivered

electric power is just under 30%. The savings ranged from about 9000

to 15000 gals per month. It should be pointed out the total energy

plant fuel savings will continue to improve as resolution of known

/ problems in plant operation is achieved. These problems include correction

of improper setting of the dry cooler controllers, isolating the

standby boiler and possible reduction of plant air-conditioning.

Using the May 1976 to October 1976 fuel data for the Jersey City

engines and boilers, models for the engine and boiler efficiencies

have been developed. These models together with data describing engine an^ boiler

outputs allow us to extrapolate the JCTE fuel usage from November 1975 through

October 1976. See Figure 7. The extrapolated fuel data and the

fuel required by a "conventional" system using purchased electric power and

absorption chilling are plotted for a one year period on this chart. Note

that the JCTE plant requires less fuel each m onth the described

conventional utilities for the site throughout the entire year.

The first interim report containing performance and economic from the

Jersey City Total Energy Demonstration will be published early in 1977.

EDITOR’S NOTE : The interim report has been approved and will be published in

June 1977. Copies will be available in July 1977. If you would like a copy please

contact Mr. J.H.Rothenberg,U.S .Dept, of Housing & Urban Dev., Washington , D. C. 20410

Analysis of the data to date shows several ways in which the plant can

be further optimized for significant reduction of fuel requirement. As

139
FUEL

CONSUMPTION

OF

JCTE

PLANT

AND

PLANT

USING

PURCHASED

ELECTRIC

POWER

AND

ABSORPTION

CHILLERS

CJ CO O ^

CO

o CO

110 13 fid 30 SN011V9

140

NOV

DEC

JAN

*

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUNE

JULY
6

these changes continue to be implemented, the data will reflect the

improvement and results will be published in future reports.

1

i

141
fi
ATTACHMENT 3

Work Material for Data Format

Committee

The following information and planning will be useful in implementary the

International Project Catalog of project descriptions,

a. Definition of MIUS type of projects to be included in the catalog.

(See Attachment A for description of MIUS type of projects)

b. Organization of Catalog

The catalog should be organized by type of project with each topic

arranged alphabetically. Recommended type of projects are as follow:

1. MIUS -an integrated utility system which provides five utility

systems

2. Total Energy Systems

3. Integrated Utility Systems (other than MIUS and Total Energy)

4. District Heating

5. Utility Subsystem

(For example: wastewater treatment where water reuse results, or water system/plants incorporating the use of renovated water or water produced by integrated plants).

6. Component /Equipment

(For example: A boiler or heat pump that is specifically being

developed to improve an integration process or to enhance an overall integrated system)

143

DEC 3 1976
- 2 -

c. Type of Graphics

The following design of the catalog is recommended.

1. One Volume

2. Typewritten

3. Organization should include three parts: Introduction;

Project Summary Forms by type of project (6 topics);

Cross-Index and a list of CCMS-MIUS Project committee

attendees.

A. Looseleaf with multi-ring binder. (Some copies will be bound as a "paper-back")

5. Printed with 8 x 10 1/2 pages

6. Illustrated cover.

7. One photograph of each demonstration facility, operating plant,

etc. may be included if provided.

d. Contents of the Introduction (Front Matter)

The contents of the Introduction should include the following:

1. Purpose - This paragraph will describe the add purpose of the catalog and its

intended use, and will indicate that it is the first level of a three level reporting system.

2. Scope - This paragraph will describe the catalog's coverage

and will define MIUS type of projects.

3. History and Description of CCMS - This paragraph will describe

CCMS and its origin. It will give the history of the CCMS-MIUS

Project, including a short summary of each CCMS-MIUS Project

Meeting.

A. Participating Countries - This paragraph will list the countries

participating in the CCMS-MIUS Project. It will emphasize that information

and participation is open to NATO and NON-NATO countries.

5. Organization of Catalog and How to Use the Catalog - A

description of how the catalog is organized and why will

be given. Instructions on how to use the catalog will

be provided. The identification numbers system will be

described. Each participating country will be assigned an identifying number.
- 3-

6. Discussion of the Project Summary Form - The Project Summary

Form will be described with a discussion of the information

requested. Instructions on how to prepare a Project Summary

Form will be given with provisions on how a participant may

provide additional inputs.

7. Discussion of the Three Level Reporting System - Each level

of reporting will be described. Information will be given

on how one may acquire a Project Progress/Evaluation Report,

Project Performance Data and other available information.

8. Updating - Information will be provided on how one may update

his Project Summary Form and how the updating mechanism works.

9. Additional Copies - Information will be provided on how one may obtain additional topics.

10.

Others - Additional information will be provided as needed or requested. A Preface and List of Acronyms will be provided

prior to the introduction.

e. Identification Number

The identification number will aid in the identification of projects and

will facilitate use of the cross-index. The cross-index will be a typical

index to identify each project by type of project * utility service, hardx^are

etc. The cross-index will be subj ect-to-identification number , and possibly

identification-number-to-subi ect . A cross-index for each country will also

be included.

The identification number will be a three part number, Section-CountrySequence. For example:

1- 01-001

Sequence Number

Country (assigned number)

Section 1

The Section number wilJ identify each type of project (subject heading)

such as MIUS Total Energy etc.

* Each country participating will be assigned a number. This will aid in

locating all of the projects in a particular country.

The sequence number will indicate the order in which projects are placed

in each section. This will facilitate quick reference.

f. Publishing the Catalog

1. The U.S. proposes to print the first version of the catalog as a NBS Special Publication and place it in the U.S. Government

Printing Office (GPO) for sale to anyone. It would be made

available in microfiche from the U.S. National Technical

145
- 4 -

Information Service (NTIS) for about $3.00 a copy. When the

GPO paper copies become exhausted (out-of-print), copies would be

made available from NTIS at their regular price according

to page count.

2. 1000 copies would be printed for free distribution by the

Secretariat. 500 copies would be losseleaf, multi-ring,

500 copies would be paperback with holes punched to facilitate

binding by the user. GPO would print enough copies for sale.

3. Each country’s representative actually participating would

receive 15 copies, looseleaf. All other participants would

receive 2 copies loose-leaf. Recipents would be designated

persons to whom supplements or revisions could be mailed.

They would be responsible for any further distribution in

their country.

4. 300 paperback copies would be mailed to Brussels for distribution at their discretion to organizations such as technical institutions

and universities. Brussels would

be responsible for mailing out updates to those whom they

have made distribution.

5. Updates would be published as punched supplements.

Supplement 1, 2, 3, etc. They essentially could be put into the

loose-leaf binders as replacement pages. Those with paperback

copies would have the option of using the basic document and

its supplement in conjunction with each other or place them together in their own loose-leaf binder. (It might be necessary

for us to publish all copies paperback with punched holes and

to supply a loose-leaf binder with selected copies as we distribute).

6. The catalog will be published without copyrights. (The Commitee

at the last meeting did not favor publishing, with copyrights.

7. The Secretariat (U.S.) would stock the remaining copies and

distribute them as the need arose.

8. Further distribution would be on a request basis to technical

experts, or technical institutions, etc.

9. A notice should be included on the Title page to discourage

anyone duplicating the material for commerical gain.

146
Summary of Project Summary Forms

Received For

INTERNATIONAL PROJECT CATALOG

ATTACHMENT 4

Form

Country No. Type Quantity

Canada 1 District Heating 1

Denmark 2 Total Energy (Diesel Power) 1

Italy 3 Total Energy/IUS (Diesel Power) 1

U.S. 4,5 MIUS 2 6,7 Total Energy 2

New Jersey - 1 each

San Diego - 1 each

8 District Heating 1

Integrated Utilities Systems 23

9 Campus Studies (HEW) - 1 each

10 ICES-ERDA - 1 each

11 ATMES-ERDA - 1 each

12 Chicago Solid Waste to

Steam - 1 each

13 Harrisburg Incineration - 1 each

14 Lindon Plant - 1 each

15-18 Alaskan Villages - 4 each

19-24 Wastewater Treatment - 6 each

with energy recovery potential and water reuse

25 Study-Analysis of Alternatives

1 each

for use of Thermal Outputs of

Plants

26-31 Combined Incinerators - 6 each

of Fuels for Power, etc.

Utilities Subsystem 21

32 Essingin-Recovery of Heat from

River with Heat Pumps - 1 each

33 Automatic Waste Heat Recovery -

1 each

34-37 Sludge and Wastewater Treatment -

4 each

38-41 Solid Waste - 4 each

42-45 Densified Waste for Fuel - 4 each

46-50 Waste as Fuels Program - 5 each

51-52 Waste to Energy - 2 each

Component Equipment 1

53 Coal Fired-MIUS - 1 each

TOTAL U.S. 50

TOTAL OTHER 3

GRAND TOTAL 53

147
.

'
ATTACHMENT 5

CCMS-MIUS PROJECT CATALOG DECEMBER, 1976

DEFINITION OF

"MIUS TYPE OF PROJECT"

Although the Modular Integrated Utility System (MIUS) concept connotes

or is thought of as the integration of five utility services to a small

group of users, a MIUS type of project for CCMS purposes can be any of

a broad range of utility/energy systems which are related to, or part

of, a MIUS. Thus, a MIUS type of project is much broader than the

rather restrictive concept definition of a "MIUS".

For the purpose of the International Project Catalog, a MIUS type of

project is one that involves a utility system/subsystem that is, or has

the potential to be, integrated with one or more utility system(s)/subsystem(s) to produce utility services more efficiently and economically

than independent (non-integrated) systems.

Proj ect

What constitutes a project? A project acceptable for inclusion in the

International Project Catalog should be hardware oriented. A project

may even be a study, such as a feasibility study, if it has major na- tional significance or is one that could lead to the construction of an actual system.

An acceptable hardware system may be a research-oriented laboratory or pilot plant investigation, or it may be a demonstration or commercial

facility which is serving actual community utility loads. A laboratory

investigation would most likely be one for equipment or sub-system development, a pilot plant would be one for experimentation with future plants

or system development in mind, a demonstration facility would be one constructed specially to prove feasibility of an actual real-life plant by

acquisition and evaluation of data. A commercial facility serving an actual community or industry is highly desirable as a CCMS-MIUS project

if basic operating data is available for evaluating performance.

Modular

The definition of the word Modular has caused some confusion over the exact

type of projects which should be included. As a guide for CCMS-MIUS projects

the meaning of the word "Modular" should not be a significant determinant

in whether or not a project meets the criteria for inclusion in the Project

Catalog.

What do we mean by Modular? Modular can have several meanings when applied

to an integrated utility system. Some ideas that may be helpful in determining a CCMS-MIUS type of project are as follows:

1. Modular may connote a small community size plant serving a small community or part of a community. Thus, the modular system is part of the overall infrastructure. It could be a small facility serving a shopping center,

a school, a hospital, an apartment complex or a combination of these.

149
2. Modular may connote a small community size plant with the potential to

grow in increments as the communities grow. Thus the added increment could

be considered a module.

3. Modular may represent the structure of the integrated utilities system itself as an integrated utilities system would consist of subsystems.

Thus, a subsystem could be considered a module.

The following types of projects are to be considered MIUS type of projects:

1. MIUS - An integrated utility systems where all utility subsystems are integrated to provide utility services better, more economically and with

less fuel consumption than a conventional system. A typical MIUS provides

power, space heating/cooling, domestic hot water, solid waste processing,

wastewater treatment and provisions for potable water. A MIUS recovers

waste heat from power generation and refuse incineration, and reduces un- desirable discharges to the environment.

2. Total Energy System - An integrated utility system that provides power,

space heating/cooling and domestic hot water. It recovers waste heat from

power generation.

3. Integrated Utility System (other than MIUS and Total Energy) - Two or more utility subsystems which are integrated. Examples are: use of renovated waste water for use in power plant cooling towers, solid waste processing with incineration and wastewater treatment, and wastewater treatment

with water renovation or reuse. A MIUS and a Total Energy System are special cases of an integrated utility system.

4. District Heating - A system by which heat is supplied to buildings in an urban area through insulated pipelines from one or more heat sources

situated external to the buildings. Any district heating system that has

the potential or is to be integrated with another utility subsystem (refuse

incineration or power generation, to provide better services at less cost

should be included.

5. Utility Subsystem - A subsystem is generally one that furnishes a single

utility service. A utility subsystem that is being improved or developed

for integration with another utility system or one that is being improved

to improve the integration process should be considered. This would include, for example an improved method of recovering heat during power generation.

6. Component /Equipment - A component or piece of equipment that is being

improved or developed specifically for. the purpose of improving the integrated utility subsystem system or the integration process. For example:

Thermal Storage Systems, boilers, heat pumps, heat exchangers, etc.

Note: A project to improve a component or piece of equipment such as a boiler or heat pump, with no specific objective related to integrated systems should not be considered.

150
Scale

Although modular in "MIUS" has sometimes been interpreted as being

limited to small scale plants, this is not correct. For the purpose of

identifying projects consider all size plants which follow the type of

projects listed above.

Status

A project acceptable for inclusion in the International Project Catalog

may be in the planning stage, on-going, or it may be one that has been

completed. A project should not be considered complete until data has

actually been evaluated and the final report published or released.

Availability of Data

A pilot plant, demonstration facility or commercial system should be one

in which good quality data that will be useful in analyzing plant performance is being acquired and is readily accessible. The more data available the better, however, operational data such as that produced by a commercial system is adequate in choosing candidates for the project

catalog.

Integrated

Integrated refers to use of a combined plant to furnish all utilities with

a total system approach, whereby some resource requirements of one utility

would be met by utilizing the effluent of another.

151

ATTACHMENT 6

CONCEPT 24-11-1976

Layout of report: measuring systems for a MIUS

1 . General introduction

(formulation of the problem)

keywords

:

- many MIUS projects, and objectives of MIUS projects

- project comparison with different goals

- assessment different approaches

- measurements in practice difficult in relation with cost

- for appropriate information, measurements are a necessity.

2. Purpose of the report

- minimum required information for comparison

- presentation of different objectives and the consequences on the

measuring system (energy conservation, economics, pollution etc.)

- to fora basis for information exchanges for the standardized format

- to present the general experience

- to give guidance to the potential user of a MIUS system

- to indicate the state of the art in relation with cost, reliability,

repeatability of measurements

- not the data acquisition system in extension

- not to present accepted standards in the countries

- to forecome mismatching of subsystems; optimisation of the MIUS system.

3. Approach of the technical problems

Basis: to generate information, measurements are necessary.

System approach - function oriented

- the MIUS as a whole system

- the subsystems classified in the function

. power generation

. heating/cooling/hot water

. solid waste processing

. waste water treatment

. potable water production.

153
4

Subsystems

For every class and subsystem

- function defined

- elements

- characteristics of in and outputs and performance

- interface with other subsystem

- parameters to be monitored.

5 . The measurements

- always set of measurements from point of view of safety, control etc.

- from MIUS different possibilities and to present in a non numerical

way

. the importance of the time element in the most important flows

(daily mean, hourly, peak value, etc.)

. for the different flows (in general terms, as fuel input, electricity

output, hot water output) or eventually classe of measurement for

instance flow measurement temperature

a non numerical classification with regard to

' accuracy under practical conditions to be expected

' repeatability of the measurements

' reliability of the measurements

* costs

. pinpointing white areas

. new developments.

6 . Approach in practice

To come to an exchange of information as soon as possible and taking

into account that a full instrumented MIUS system and subsystems is

only available when the system has a demonstration characteristic the

following levels of the scope of measurement can be recognised:

A. MIUS system as a whole

- integrated inputs and outputs, as fuel consumption, electricity

production, gas consumption, waste streams (?), potable water

consumption etc.

(it is expected that most of the mentioned data are required for

the charging of the inhabitants).

154
- 3 -

B. The subsystem inputs and outputs

- integrated over a certain period (hourly, daily, weekly)

- momentarily to calculate performance and input for

. optimisation, control systems performance, interface problems etc.

For the comparison of the MIUS system with a conventional system

or with other MIUS systems it is necessary to generate information

regarding:

- the characteristics of the building, or complex of buildings etc. - the weather conditions in an appropriate manner.

7. Data acquisition system

It is proposed to present this paragraph in a rather general way.

Perhaps it is possible to give some indication of the possibilities,

costs, pros and contras etc. only from a point of view of the user

of the system.

In a demonstration type MIUS systems differ on the measuring set up

strongly from the practice of the management of the system.

8. Influence objective

The objective of the measurements can be quite different as mentioned

above (energy conservation, economics, pollution, optimisation system etc.).

As user directed expose is required what the consequences are of a more

specific objective on the measurements and data acquisition system.

9. Conclusions

10.

Annexes

KRO

155

APPENDIX J

MINUTES

OF THE

CCMS -MIUS PROJECT MEETING

July 1977 (Turin)

J1
The minutes of the fifth CCMS-MIUS Project Meeting held July 12-lU, 1977

at the FIAT Central Research Laboratory, Orbassano, Italy (near Turin) have

not been completed and thus are not available for this report.

A summary of the meeting has been prepared for purposes of this

report and are included herein.

J2
SUMMARY OF THE CCMS-MIUS PROJECT MEETING

July 12-14, 1977, near Turin, Italy at

FIAT Central Research Laboratory, Orbassano

Summary: Representatives from seven NATO countries attended the

July 12-14, 1977 MIUS Project Meeting near Turin, Italy

(the fifth and final meeting). The participants received

reports from the various working committees (subgroups)

approved the catalog and a procedure for the documents prepared by the

working committees to be included in the final report for

submittal to the October Plenary. The overall Committee

will recommend to the Plenary that the committees' principal

work continue that attention be given to the institutional

problems associated with the implementation of integrated

utility systems and that other international organization(s)

be sought under whose auspices the work could continue.

1. The fifth and last meeting of the CCMS-MIUS Project was held

July 12-14, 1977 at the FIAT Central Research Laboratory, Orbassano,

Italy (near Turin)

2. Sixteen experts from seven NATO countries (Belgium, France, FRG,

Italy, Netherlands, U.K. and U.S.) participated. Twenty-two observers

from various Italian industries and research organizations attended

part of the first day.

3. The experts first reported on MlUS-type of projects in their respective

countries. U.S. delegates (Rothenberg and Phillips) reviewed the

Total Energy demonstration project at Jersey City, N.J. and the planned

MIUS demonstration project at St. Charles, Maryland. Patrick Folan,

the U.S. CCMS Officer, provided an update of the other CCMS pilot

studies

4. The Data Format, Measurement Technology, Research Needs, and

"Incentives and Barriers" working committees met and submitted their

recommendations to the overall committee. The Ad Hoc Committee on the

future activities of the project met, Monday, July 11, 1977 at

1600 hours and presented its recommendations to the overall committee.

5. The committee accomplished and decided the following:

(a) The final draft of the International Project Catalog and

Addendum presented by the Data Format Committee was approved

for submittal to the Plenary which will meet October 1977.

(b) Inputs received by the Secretariat by August 1, 1977 and

comments received during the meeting will be incorporated into

the final draft.

J3
(c) The completed catalog will be sent to NATO headquarters,

September 1977 for submittal to the October Plenary. The

Secretariat will publish the catalog upon approval by the

Plenary.

(d) The outline of the final report for the October Plenary was

reviewed, revised and approved. The final report need not

be a published document. The final report will be prepared

by the Secretariat and submitted to the NATO headquarters

September 1977 for approval at the October Plenary.

(e) The draft of the standard methodology for measuring and

reporting the performance of integrated utility systems was presented by the Measurement Technology Committee and approval

for inclusion in the final report pending incorporation of

comments. Additional comments are to be forwarded to the

Committee Chairman by August 1, 1977. The completed standard

methodology is to be forwarded to the Secretariat by

September 1, 1977 for inclusion in the final report.

(f) The recommendations of the Research Needs Committee for

needed reserach in support of Integrated Utility System

Technology were approved for inclusion in the final report.

Any additional comments are to be forwarded to the Committee

Chairman by August 1,1977. The completed recommendations

are to be forwarded to the Secretariat by September 1, 1977

for inclusion in the final report.

(g) The Committee on "Incentives and Barriers" presented its

paper on the incentives and barriers to the implementation

of Integrated Utilities Systems. Comments from the various

participating countries are to be forwarded to the Chairman

within 2 weeks. A second draft is to be prepared and circulated

to the participants in attendance in about six months for

comment and approval. The ppper will not be available for inclusion

in the final report to be submitted to the October (1977) Plenary

but is being considered for inclusion in a subsequent follow-up

report to the Plenary.

(h) The Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendations on future

activities to the overall Committee for approval. The

recommendations were revised and approved for inclusion in

the final report to the Plenary.

(i) The CCMS-MIUS Project Committee will recommend to the CCMS Plenary

that (a) Means for continuing the information exchange between

countries be sought, (b) means for continuing the Project Catalog

and the exchange of data from these projects, the standard

methodology for measuring and reporting the performance of

integrated utility systems and the work of the "Incentives and

Barriers" committee (c) a mechanism be developed for informing

countries of their need to change laws and regulations to

receive the benefits of integrated utility systems (d) procedures

be developed for the services of experts to assist and inform

countries which request such assistance in the implementation of

integrated utilities (e) that research be carried out to

J4
satisfy the needs in integrated utility system technology

identified in the CCMS-MIUS Project Final Report, and (f)

other organization (s) be soi^ght by the Secretariat under

whose auspices project work could continued. Refer to the

attached agenda.

J5
COMMITTEE ON THE CHALLENGES OF MODERN SOCIETY

RATIONAL USE OF ENERGY PILOT STUDY

MODULAR INTEGRATED UTILITY SYSTEM (MIUS) PROJECT

CONFIRMATION NOTICE OF

SCHEDULED MEETING

Date: Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday

July 12-14, 1977

Place: FIAT Central Research laboratory at Orbassano

(Strada Torino 50)near Turin, Italy (15 Km)

Official Host: Dr. Eng. Vincenzo Mazzaglia

Consiglio Nazionale dell Ricerche

Roma, Italy

Coordinator for: Dr. Angelo Rossi

Meeting FIAT Central Research Laboratory

Meeting Chairman: C .W. Phillips , U.S.

Order for Business

TUESDAY, July 12

0830 Bus leaves hotel Turin Palace

0900 REGISTRATION, CALL TO ORDER AND WELCOME

Welcome to FIAT Research Center,

Prof. Ugo I. Businaro, Director CRF

Welcome to Italy and Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche,

Prof. Mario Silvestro, President of Technological Committee, CNR

Welcome to CCMS-MIUS Project Meeting

C.W. Phillips, US

0930 UPDATE OF CCMS ACTIVITIES

Patrick Folan, Esq.

CCMS Officer

U.S. Mission NATO Brussels

J6
- 2 -

0945

1000

1015

1030

1245

1415

REVIEW AND UPDATE OF CCMS-MIUS PROJECT ACTIVITIES

J .H.Rothenberg , Manager,

U.S. HUD-MIUS Program (HUD is the U . S .Department of Housing and

Urban Development)

COFFEE BREAK

TECHNICAL PRESENTATION - U.S. HUD-MIUS PROGRAM

Mr. J .H.Rothenberg , Manager, U.S.

HUD-MIUS Program, will describe the current status of the HUDMIUS Program including the Total Energy plant at Jersey City,

New Jersey and the MIUS Demonstration at St. Charles, Md. and

other related projects. Emphasis will be placed on (a) Evaluation of plants performance using data over a one year period

(1975-1976) (b) Institutional constraints and incentives concerning

the MIUS Demonstration at St. Charles, (c) Design alternatives.

UPDATE OF INTEGRATED UTILITY SYSTEMS PROJECTS

Experts in attendance are requested to present brief reports on on- going projects in their respective countries . (Notice to presentors:

Written reports for distribution to attendees will be helpful)

.

Audiovisual equipment will be available for those who have slides,

veiwgraphs, etc.

LUNCH (hot buffet; offered by CRF)

TASK 1 DATA FORMAT COMMITTEE

C.W. Phillips (USA), Chairman

(All CCMS-MIUS Project experts are requested to participate in

the Data Format Committee Work Session.)

Discussion and review for approval:

a. Review and approval of Final Draft of International Project

Catalog

(1) Content and Completeness of Introduction, (Part I)

(2) Organization and Format of Catalog,

° catagories by types of projects

° parts and sections

° number system by section and by characterization

of project

0 index and cross referencing (Part II)

(3) Definition of "MIUS Type of Project"

(4) Project Descriptions, (Part III)

° appropriateness of submitted Project Summary

Forms

° Screening Process

° Comments on Accuracy and Completeness of Project

Summary Forms

(5) Identification of New Projects and additional Project Summary Forms

to be submitted

(6) Poll of countries for additional inputs to catalog

J7
1645

1700

2000

b. Review and approval of Method of Production and Printing

° Typewritten

° Duplicated with punched holes for 3 ring binder

° Banded for distribution

c. Review and approval of Committee's recommendation for dissemination

d. Schedule for publishing catalog

e. Recommendations on Progress/Evaluation Reports for AD HOC

Committee on Future Activities of Project.

° Need and Use

° Acquisition of Comments and Improvements

° Methodology for supplying Project/Evaluation Reports

to participants, if necessary

° Milestones and Schedules, if necessary

f. Other recommendations for Ad Hoc Committee

Consideration of:

Catalog of Component Parts

Update of International Project Catalog

DATA FORMAT COMMITTEECanada (K.R.Solvason)

Italy (M.Mangialaj o)

Netherlands (J.W.H.Van den Bergh)

United Kingdom (.P. J. O'Neill)

United States (C .W .Phillips)

ADJOURN DATA FORMAT COMMITTEE SESSION

Bus leaves for hotel Turin Palace

SOCIAL HOUR AND DINNER - Courtesy of CNR

J8
WEDNESDAY, July 13, 1977

0830

0900

1145

Bus leaves hotel Turin Palace

TASK 2 MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

- J.A.Knobbout (The Netherlands) Chairman

(All CCMS-MIUS Project experts are requested to participate

in the Measurement Technology Committee work session.)

Discussion and Review for approval:

a. General update of Committee goals and objectives

b. Review and approval of Final Draft of Standard Methodology

for reporting the performance of MIUS type of systems and

taking of and reporting of data.

c. Schedule for incorporating comments and submitting to

Secretarial for inclusion in final report. The Final Report

will be submitted to the CCMS Plenary for approval at their

October, 1977 meeting.

d. Recommendation for Ad Hoc Committee on future activities,

MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE

France (T. Grjebine)

Federal Republic of Germany (H. Klein or F. Richter)

Netherlands (J.A. Knobbout)

Sweden (U. Renghold)

United States (C .W. Phillips)

TASK 3 RESEARCH NEEDS COMMITTEE

- J.A. Michel (Belgium), Chairman

(All participants are requested to provide input to the Research

Needs Committee)

Discussion and review for approval:

a. Review and approval of Final Draft on Needs for research in

support of Integrated Utility System Technology. (This is

to be a prioritized list of research needs in integrated

utility system technology for inclusion in the Final Report

of the CCMS-MIUS Project. The Final Report will be submitted to

the CCMS Plenary for approval at their Oct. 1977 meeting).

b. Additional Recommendations by Participants.

c. Schedule for incorporating comments and submitting to

Secretariat for inclusion in final report.

d. Recommendations for Ad Hoc Committee on future activities.

j9
1245 LUNCH (Coffee Break at 10:30 and 1500 pm)

1415

RESEARCH COMMITTEE

Belgium (J.A. Michel)

Federal Republic of Germany (W. Piller or Dr. H. Klein)

United States (S. Cavros)

COMMITTEE ON "BARRIERS AND INCENTIVES"

Discussion and review for approval:

a. Review and approval of Paper on "Barriers and Incentives"

(This is a paper discussing the barriers and incentives

that impact on the implementation of a MIUS for inclusion in

the Final Report of the CCMS-MIUS Project)

b. Additional Recommendations by Participants

c. Schedule for incorporating comments and submitting paper

to the Secretariat for inclusion in final report.

The Final Report will be submitted to the CCMS

Plenary for approval at their October 1977 meeting.

d. Recommendations for Ad Hoc Committee on future activities.

COMMITTEE MEMBERS

U.S. (S. Cavros)

France (T. Grjebine)

Italy (M. Mangialajo)
AD HOC COMMITTEE ON FUTURE PROJECT ACTIVITIES

Discussion and review:

a. Report of Committee - Recommendations on future activities of

project. (This Committee is scheduled to meet Monday, July 11, 1977

at FIAT to prepare this report. All participants are invited

to attend the Ad Hoc Committee meeting.

b. Report on Progress to continue Project activities under the

auspices of another international organization.

c. Additional Recommendations of Participants

d. Schedule for submitting recommendations to Secretariat for

inclusion in the final report. The fin^l Rep9 *t vill be submitted

to the CCMS Plenary for approval at their October, 1977 meeting.

COMMITTEE MEMBERS

Patrick Folan

C.W. Phillips

J .H.Rothenberg

U. Plant ikow

J . A.Knobbout

J .A. Michel

COMMITTEE SUMMARIES /APPROVAL

a. Data Format Committee, Task 1

b. Measurement Technology Committee, Task 2

c. Research Needs Committee, Task 3

d. Committee on "Barriers and Incentives"

OTHER BUSINESS

a. Recommendations on Content of Final Report of the CCMS-MIUS

Project Meeting

° Description of CCMS, CCMS-MIUS Project, Project Activities

° Description CCMS-MIUS Project Committee Accomplishments

° Chapters on Glossary Methodology of Reporting Performance,

Research Needs, Barriers and Incentives and Recommendations for Future Activities

b. Action on Recommendations of AD HOC Commiteee regarding:

° Future Activities

° Other organizations for MIUS Project Activities

° Future Meetings

c. Summary of CCMS-MIUS Project Accomplishments

C.W. Phillips, Chairman
1645 ADJOURN FOR THE DAY

1700

THURSDAY

0830

0900

1245

1430

Bus leaves for hotel Turin Palace

EVENING OPEN

July 14, 1977 *

Bus leaves from hotel Turin Palace for Laboratories

TECHNICAL TOUR of FIAT CENTRAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES AT ORBASSANO

The itinerary for visiting the laboratories will be determined

on the first day of the project meeting, Tuesday, July 12, 1977.

Participants in attendance will be given an opportunity to recommend

additional projects which they may wish to visit. Participants

may wish to include visits to other research projects at other

remote facilities on an individual basis. In this event CRF will

assist those participants as appropriate in making the necessary

arrangements for those facilities that are available.

FIAT - CRF Energy Activities:

° TOTEM (Small power Total Energy Module)

° Diesel powered heat pump for ambient climatization (a realization totally supported by CNR)

° Organic fluid Rankine cycle for waste heat utilization

(an activity partially supported by the European Economic

Commission)

LUNCH

CLOSING OF THE MEETING

(A bus leaves for town)

J12
INFORMATION ON REGISTRATION , ACCOMMODATIONS AND TRAVEL

Registration

Each participant is requested to register prior Id the meeting by completing the

self-addressed card enclosed with this agenda and mailing it to C .W .Phillips , Chairman, National Bureau of Standards, Building 225, Room A146, Washington, D.C. 20234.

Early registration will be most helpful to the host in making preparations for

the meeting. Please register by June 1, 1977.

Accommodations

Hotel reservations are made by each participant. The host has made arrangement

with the travel agency VENTANA in Turin for participants to contact them directly

for their hotel reservations. The suggested date for making your reservations through

VENTANA was June 15, 1977. However, if you have not already made your reservations, it

is suggested that you contact VENTANA immediately.

Please send request for reservations to:

VENTANA

Galleria San Federico, 16

10121 Torino, Italy

Attn: Mr. Brusa - Telex 23239

Be sure to indicate that you will be attending the CCMS-MIUS Project meeting, at

FIAT Central Research Laboratory at Orbassano.

The following hotel and room options are suggested:

Hotel Turin Palace

Singlebath: LIT. 30,000

Doublebath: LIT. 45,000

Hotel Suisse

Singlebath: LIT. 14,600

Doublebath: LIT. 23,000

Hotel Luxor:

Singlebath: LIT. 12,500

Doublebath: LIT. 19,000

Above rates include continental breakfast and taxes.

Agency Fee: LIT 1,500 per room.

VENTANA, upon receipt of requests for accommodations will forward a confirmation

and additional information concerning travel and tourism.

Travel from Hotels to Laboratories

FIAT will furnish transportation to and from the hotels to the laboratories. A

bus will d epar t f r om the TURIN PALACE at 830 for the laboratories, and from the

laboratories at 1700 for the hotels. The three suggested hotels are within walking

distance from each other. Those staying at the Suisse and Lux©r will need to

walk to the Turin Palace for connections.

J13
- 9-

Travel to and from Airports to Hotels

Each participant will need to arrange and supply his/her own travel from the

arriving airports to the hotel in Turin.

For Milan arrivals, transportation by train is available to Turin from Milan,

approximately a 2 hour trip. Bus transportation is available from both Milan airport

to the train station. (MALPENSA - Intercontinental flights, LINATE - European

flights)

For Turin arrivals, bus transportation is available from the Turin airport (CASELLE)

to the hotel.

Flights to Turin and Milan

Several daily flights arrive at Milan - Linate from Frankfurt, London and Paris.

Evening flights arrive in Turin from Frankfurt, London and Paris.

Contacts

If you have any questions concerning the CCMS-MIUS Project, please get in touch

with the Project Chairman, C.W. Phillips, Room A146, Bldg. 225, National Bureau of

Standards, Washington, D.C. 20234, U.S.A., telephone 202-921-3741. The NBS telex

number is 89-8493.

If you have any questions concerning your travel and accommodations

please get in touch with Dr. Rossi, the meeting coordinator for FIAT at

the FIAT Central Research Lab at Orbassano near Turin. His* telephone number is

901.14.01/2/3/4/5. The telex number is 22289 Fiatlabs.

USCOMM-NBS-DC

J14

w
NBS-1 14A (REV. 7-73)

U.S. DEPT. OF COMM. BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA

SHEET

1. PUBLICATION OK RKPORT NO. NBSIR-78-1468-2

2. Gov’t Accession

No.

3. Recipient’s Accession No.

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society

Rational Use of Energy Pilot Study

Modular Integrated Utility Systems Project

Volume 2

5. Publication Date

6. Performing Organization ( odr

7. AUTHOR(S)

M.Nimmo, C.W. Phillips

8 . Performing Organ. Report No.

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20234

10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. 7334370

11. Contract/Grant No.

12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Complete Address (Street, City, State, ZIP)

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

451 7th St. , S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20410

13. Type of Report & Period Covered

14. Sponsoring Agency Code

15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

16. ABSTRACT (A 200-word or less factual summary of most significant information. If document includes a significant

bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.) This report by the Committee on the Challenges of

Modern Society - Modular Integrated Utility Systems (MIUS) Project includes a descriptior

of the project, its objectives, the chronology of the project, a description of its

activities and products, copies of its products (appendices A-E) , and minutes of its

meetings. This report further discusses the progress of each activity and product and

gives the committee’s recommendations, which call for the continuation of the project

activities.

The objectives of the CCMS-MIUS Project were to identify MIUS Type of Projects in participating countries and to develop a mechanism for transferring technical data concerning

these products to experts in the participating countries. The project had its first meet

ing in Brussels, April 10-11, 1975 and its last meeting in Turin, July 12-14, 1977.

The project produced a glossary of special terms, a project summary form the International Project Catalog, and a list of research needs in MIUS Type of Projects. It began

development of a project progress/evaluation report, a standard methodology for measuring

the performance of MIUS Type of Projects and a paper on "Incentives and Barriers". The

glossary is expected to promote a greater understanding of terms unique to MIUS and the

project summary form was developed to seek project descriptions for the catalog. The

catalog identifies MIUS Type of Projects and the project progress /evaluation report provides progress of a project and technical information for purposes of evaluation and com- parison. The standard methodology identifies the type of information required for measui

ing the performance of a MIUS Type of Project and the collecting and reporting of data.

17. KEY WORDS (six to twelve entries; alphabetical order; capitalize only the first letter of the first key word unless a proper name; separated by semicolons)

CCMS, CCMS-MIUS Project, Information Exchange, Integrated Utility Systems,

International Information Exchange, MIUS, Report to CCMS Plenary

18. AVAILABILITY [Xj Unlimited

[_ E or Official Distribution. Do Not Release to NT1S

[_ J Order From Sup. of Doc., U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402, SI) ( at. No. (13

[X] Order Prom National Technical Information Service (N I IS) Springfield, Virginia 22151

19. SECURITY CLASS

(THIS REPORT)

UNCL ASSIFIF.

D

20. SECURITY CLASS

(THIS PAGE)

UNCLASSIFIED

21. NO. OF PAGES

176

22. Price

$ 9.00

USCOMM-DC 29042-P74