alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
   EXTRACTED FROM CHRYSLER FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND 
   SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
   ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY 
   BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                           $       572
<SECURITIES>                             397
<RECEIVABLES>                         15,400
<ALLOWANCES>                             207
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                 1,447
<DEPRECIATION>                           328
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        18,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      0
<BONDS>                               12,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                  25
<OTHER-SE>                             3,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          18,830
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         630
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          141
<INCOME-TAX>                              48
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       93
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                              93
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Evidence and Innovation 
            -  Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review 
            -           About Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review      

# About Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review

## Project Overview

The Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review is currently active. The information found on this website is up to date as of April 2023. The program is supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), the Office of Population Affairs (OPA), and the Administration for Children and Families' Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The Teen Pregnancy Prevention Evidence Review is conducted under contract to Mathematica. For questions regarding this website, please email **youthgov@air.org**
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

	FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of July 11, 2001, between Chesapeake Corporation, a Virginia corporation (the "Company"), and Andrew J. Kohut (the "Executive").

	**WHEREAS,**the Company and the Executive entered into an Executive Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") dated September 13, 1999; 

	**WHEREAS**, pursuant to Section 10 of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended by mutual consent of the Company and the Executive; and

	**WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement;

	**NOW THEREFORE**, the Agreement is hereby amended in the following respects:

	FIRST:  The following new Section 2 (d) is added to the Agreement:

(d)  For purposes of this Section 2, "Cause" means the Executive's conviction by a court of competent jurisdiction for, or pleading no contest to, a felony.

	SECOND:  The following new Section 3 (c) is added to the Agreement:

(c) For purposes of this Section 3, "Cause" means: (a) conduct involving dishonesty or fraud or activities that may reasonably be expected to have a materiel adverse effect on the property, business or reputation of the Company; (b) conviction or admission of, or a plea of guilty or no contest to, a felony; (c) breach of any material obligation to the Company; or (d) willful failure to perform duties to the Company which is not corrected within thirty (30) days of prior written notice by the Company to the Executive or willful misconduct in the performance of such duties.

THIRD:  Section 8 (a) is deleted and Sections 8 (b), 8 (c), and 8 (d) are renumbered as 8 (a), 8 (b) and 8 (c), respectively.

	Except as provided above, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement to be duly executed on its behalf and the Executive has duly executed this First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement, all as of the date first above written.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

410,000
35°00" z

112°15"

T.19N

1,450,000

Pk 420,000 R.2 E,

440,000.

430,000

BULLETIN 1021 PLATE 45

f
480,000 x

RE. 460,000 Pk 470,000 Ra

Fe WA

i

112°0”

35° 00”

T.19 N

GY

1,440,000

1,430,000

>

1,420,000}*

1,410,000

Di

1,400,000

50"

1,390,000

D

>

1,380,000

Qe

1,370,000

34° 457!
Ji2 ws

COYOTE
FAULT

410,000 PPsl Thy:

Base from U. S. Geological Survey
quadrangle map, edition of 1948

TRUE NORTH
Mag
NETIC rs
Re

6 ‘420,000 107 430,000 PPs| age 440,000 Qivg

GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE CLARKDALE

Seale 1:48,000

a
3
TH

1,450,000

ata

440,000

C2

T.18.N.

$11,430,000

34 1,420,000

F'

1,410,000

=H 49000

1,390,000
@

1,380,000

ed Taling ond
TuzIG
Zi AT WO

1,370,000

34° 457

460,000

INTERIOR—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, D.C.
MR 5536

470,000
Geology by R. E. Lehner, 1952-53;

S.C. Creasey, 1951; H. C. Rainey,
. June-Oct. 1952; D. O. Dickey,
Oct.-Feb. 1952-53

R.2E. ie
Bessie |” 450,000
FAULT

QUADRANGLE, ARIZONA

4 Miles

Soares et

1000 _0
=

18000 Feet t
=—

112°00

EXPLANATION

Qr

Recent

Qt

Qr, riverwash; Qt, terrace deposits

Qg

Pleistocene

Gravel deposits

UNCONFORMITY

OT ps

Perkinsville formation
OTs, sedimentary rocks;
py, voleanie rocks

Verde formation
Qly, fine-grained lake deposits;
Qivg, gravel deposits;
Qiwy, voleanic rocks

UNCONFORMITY

Intermediate basalt

UNCONFORMITY

Thd ©
i

[Ths

Hickey formation

Ths, sedimentary rocks; Thy, volcanic rocks; Thd,
basalt dikes

Pliocene (?)

UNCONFORMITY

Pk

Kaibab limestone

UNCONFORMITY

Toroweap formation

Coconino sandstone

Supai formation

Psu, upper member; Psm, middle member; PPsl, lower
‘member, which may include Naco group equivalents
of Pennsylvanian age

UNCONFORMITY

Redwall limestone

Lower
and Mississippian

UNCONFORMITY

Martin limestone

ue

Middle
Upper

UNCONFORMITY (?)

Tapeats sandstone (?)

UNCONFORMITY

Quartz porphyry

Grapevine Gulch formation

Spud Mountain
voleanies

Alder group

Yavapai series

Ash Creek group

Deception rhyolite

The Ash Creek group and the Alder group are in
fault contact. Their age relation is not known

Showing dip; dashed where approximately located

sual urea
D Fault

Showing dip; dashed where approximately located;
U, upthrown side; D, downthrown side

90

—
Vertical fault

Concealed fault

Probable concealed fault

15
Strike and dip of beds

®
Horizontal beds

80
Strike and dip of foliation

ices:
Strike of vertical foliation

_
Strike of vertical joints
Taken from aerial photographs

QUATERNARY

TERTIARY

PERMIAN

PENNSYLVANIAN AND PERMIAN

DEVONIAN — MISSISSIPPIAN

CAMBRIAN(?)

PRECAMBRIAN

CARBONIFEROUS
#### 552.236-72 Submittals.

As prescribed in 536.572, insert the following clause:

# Submittals (MAR 2019)

(a) The Contractor shall prepare and submit all submittals as specified in the contract or requested by the Contracting Officer.

(1) Submittals may include: safety plans, schedules, shop drawings, coordination drawings, samples, calculations, product information, or mockups.

(2) Shop drawings may include fabrication, erection and setting drawings, manufacturers' scale drawings, wiring and control diagrams, cuts or entire catalogs, pamphlets, descriptive literature, and performance and test data.

(b) Unless otherwise provided in this contract, or otherwise directed by the Contracting Officer, submittals shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer.

(c) The Contractor shall be entitled to receive notice of action on submittals within a reasonable time, given the volume or complexity of the submittals and the criticality of the affected activities to substantial completion as may be indicated in the project schedule.

(d) Review of submittals will be general and shall not be construed as permitting any departure from the contract requirements.

(e) The Contractor shall not proceed with construction work or procure products or materials described or shown in submittals until the submittal is reviewed. Any work or activity undertaken prior to review shall be at the Contractor's risk. Should the Contracting Officer subsequently determine that the work or activity does not comply with the contract, the Contractor shall be responsible for all cost and time required to comply with the Contracting Officer's determination. The Contracting Officer shall have the right to order the Contractor to cease execution of work for which submittals have not been reviewed. The Government shall not be liable for any cost or delay incurred by the Contractor attributable to the proper exercise of this right.

(f) The Contractor shall identify, in writing, all deviations or changes in resubmitted submittals. In the absence of such written notice, review of a resubmission shall not include or apply to such deviations or changes.

(End of clause)

*Alternate I* (MAR 2019) As prescribed in 536.572, add the following paragraph to the basic clause:

(g) The Contractor shall submit design documents for review in accordance with PBS-P100. The Government shall review submittals for the limited purpose of verifying that the documents conform to the design criteria expressed in the contract documents.

[84 FR 3722, Feb. 13, 2019]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Americans with Disabilities Act      

# Americans with Disabilities Act

Site providing information and technical assistance on provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

http://www.ada.gov/
Exhibit 10.1


 


CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED – CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS


 DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH


 THE COMMISSION. THE OMITTED PORTIONS HAVE BEEN REPLACED WITH "[***]".


 




CHANGE MANAGEMENT FORM 15


TO STATEMENT OF WORK #3


 




	 	
Program: Support.com, XH Remote Support Program SOW #3 ("SOW #3) dated March 21, 2014

	 	
PCR No.:


	 	
Originator:  Joy Park

	 	
Date: May 8, 2017


	 	
Department: NCO

	 	
Phone #: [***]

	 	
Title: Vice President


	 	
Locations Impacted:  Work at Home Locations


	 	
Requested Implementation Date: May 24, 2017


	 	
Estimated Hours: (LOE)

	 	
☒ Billable        ☐ Non-Billable

	 	
Billing Rate/Hour: See below


	 	
Fixed Fee Cost (if applicable)  N/A


	 	
Type of Change:  Incentive Program


	 	
Scope of Change:

	 	
☒ Minor (Anything within current contract)

	 	
☐Major (may require contract amendment)


MUST BE REVIEWED BY Business and/or P&L Owner


	 	
Reason for Change: Comcast and Vendor agree to extend the XH Mobile Chat App Term as set forth in more detail below.  Unless specifically provided in this CMF, all other terms of SOW 3 remain unchanged.


	 	
Area(s) of Change


	 	
☐    Accounting/Payroll

	 	
☐    Network


	 	
☐    Data Processing

	 	
☒    Resource Planning


	 	
☐    General Facilities

	 	
☐    Quality Assurance


	 	
☐    Human Resources

	 	
☐    Telecom


	 	
☐    IT/BI

	 	
☐    Training


	 	
☐    Operations

	 	
☐    Recruiting


	 	
☒    Other:  XH Mobile Chat App Support







 




The parties, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, agree to the following:








		1.	
The XH Mobile Chat App Term, as outlined in CMF 12 of SOW 3 dated February 3, 2017, shall be extended from [***] to [***].












	
Comcast Authorization

	 
	
Comcast Representative's Signature

	 	
/s/ Joy Park 










	
Print Name

	 	
Joy Park

	
Date

	
05/12/2017










	
Support.com Authorization

	 
	
Support.com Representative's Signature

	 	
/s/ Rick Bloom










	
Print Name

	 	
Rick Bloom

	
Date

	
05/12/2017

	 



 



*** CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL REDACTED AND SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE


COMMISSION ***
#### GUTLIN, Respondent, v. GUTLIN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by Eliza Gutlin against Herman Gutlin.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted.
570.306 Evaluating offers. ( a ) The contracting officer must evaluate offers solely in accordance with the factors and subfactors stated in the SFO.
( b ) Evaluate prices and document the lease file to demonstrate that the proposed contract price is fair and reasonable. The contracting officer must review the elements of the offeror's proposed rent to analyze whether the individual elements are realistic and reflect the offeror's clear understanding of the work to be performed. The contracting officer must discuss any inconsistencies with the offeror. If the offeror refuses to support or make any changes to the rent proposed, consider the risk to the Government prior to making any lease award.
( c ) Evaluate past performance on previous lease projects in accordance with 515.305 and FAR 15.305(a)(2). Obtain information through: ( 1 ) Questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of the acquisition;
( 2 ) Interviews with program managers or contracting officers;
( 3 ) Other sources; or
( 4 ) Past performance information collected under FAR 42.15 and available through the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System at *https://www.cpars.gov/ ,* or successor system.
( d ) The contracting officer may obtain information to evaluate an offeror's past performance on subcontracting plan goals and monetary targets from the following sources: ( 1 ) The Small Business Administration;
( 2 ) Information on prior contracts from contracting officers and administrative contracting officers;
( 3 ) Offeror's references; and
( 4 ) Past performance information collected under FAR 42.15 and available through PPIRS.
( e ) Document the evaluation of award factors other than price listed in the solicitation. The file must include the basis for evaluation, an analysis of each offer, and a summary of findings.
( f ) Also see the requirements in 570.108, 570.109 and 570.111.
[64 FR 37265, July 9, 1999, as amended at 76 FR 30851, May 27, 2011; 85 FR 38337, June 26, 2020; 89 FR 11749, Feb. 15, 2024]
#### MINK, Appellant, v. MINK, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 17, 1906.)

Action by Edwin R. Mink against Fred L. Mink.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, w’ith $10 costs.
Order entered April 18, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00338-CR

KENNETH TYRELL WINSLOW, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 001-85568-2017

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 17, 2018 motion to withdraw his appeal. Although 

the motion is signed by counsel, it is not signed by appellant as required by Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 42.2. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2 (“appellant and his or her attorney must sign the 

motion.”).

 We DENY the motion without prejudice to filing a motion that complies with the rules 

of appellate procedure.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.4


 


National Energy Services Reunited Corp.


777 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 800


Houston, Texas 77056 


May 11, 2017


  


NESR Holdings Ltd.


Ritter House


Wickhams Cay II


Road Town


Tortola


VG 1110


British Virgin Islands


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our agreement
that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of National Energy
Services Reunited Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the
Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration
Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), NESR Holdings Ltd.
shall make available to the Company certain office space and administrative and support services as may be required by the Company
from time to time, situated at 777 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 800, Houston, Texas 77056 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore,
the Company shall pay NESR Holdings Ltd. the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter until
the Termination Date. NESR Holdings Ltd. hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in
or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) to be established upon
the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a
result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the
Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


	 	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	 	NATIONAL ENERGY SERVICES REUNITED CORP.
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/Sherif
Foda
	 	 	 	Name: Sherif Foda
	 	 	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 	 
	Acknowledged and Accepted by:	 	 
	 	 	 
	NESR HOLDINGS LTD.	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Thomas Wood	 	 
	 	Name: Thomas Wood	 	 
	 	Title: Director
#### Dorothy Carlson, as Administratrix of the Estate of August W. Carlson, Deceased, Respondent, v. Long Island Rail Road, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s decedent, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 8,1961, after trial, upon the jury’s verdict of $87,000 in favor of plaintiff. Judgment reversed on the law, without costs, and complaint dismissed. Findings of fact implicit in the jury’s verdict are affirmed. Decedent walked from a point about 15 feet outside the eastbound track of defendant railroad across the said track in the direction of the westbound track. Decedent was in the middle of the eastbound track when defendant’s westbound train was 400 feet away, at which time defendant’s engineer saw him. Decedent proceeded heedlessly to the westbound track, and when he reached that track, walked either diagonally away from the train with his back toward the oncoming train or in the same direction that the westbound train was moving with his back toward the train. Decedent was stepping over the last rail of the westbound track when he was struck and killed. Had he proceeded four or five inches more he would have cleared the track. On this evidence, the trial court held that decedent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, but it submitted the ease to the jury on the theory of last clear chance. In our opinion, even though the jury may have properly found that defendant’s engineer gave no signal of the approach of the train, the evidence was insufficient as matter of law to make out a case of liability on the theory of last clear chance *(Kawacz*v. *Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co.,*259 N. Y. 166; cf. *Polk*v. *New York Cent. R. R. Co,,*10 A D 2d 703, affd. 8 N Y 2d 1106). In any event, the negligence of decedent in pro ceeding heedlessly into danger and then turning his back to the oncoming train made his negligence contemporaneous with that of defendant’s engineer, in *938which event the doctrine of last clear chance is inapplicable *(Panarese*v. *Union Ry. Co.,*261 N. Y. 233; *Hernandez*v. *Brooklyn & Queens Tr. Corp.,*284 N. Y. 535). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.