alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Durham, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, rendered June 14, 1961, after trial, convicting him of assault in the third degree, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Promoting Recovery and Resilience for Children and Youth Involved in Juvenile Justice and Child Welfare Systems      

# Promoting Recovery and Resilience for Children and Youth Involved in Juvenile Justice and Child Welfare Systems

A report from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration illustrates the heightened risk of young people in juvenile justice and child welfare systems having experienced traumatic events and developing mental health conditions. However, as the report states, appropriate care for these children and youth can promote recovery and resilience.

http://store.samhsa.gov/product/Promoting-Recovery-and-Resilience-for-Children-and-Youth-Involved-in-Juvenile-Justice-and-Child-Welfare-Systems/SMA12-4697
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Norma Brill, Respondent, and Muller Brothers, Inc., Appellant.

Order, entered on July 23, 1964, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied. Petitioner fails to allege sufficient facts to establish the existence of partiality on the part of the arbitrator or that any partiality contributed to the making of the award. *(Matter of Goldens Bridge Colony [Cooper],*265 App. Div. 857.) The mere suggestion of partiality is not sufficient to require a hearing pursuant to CPLR 7511. Additionally, the issue having been raised and at least partially considered in the initial proceeding in which petitioner-respondent prevailed, and an appeal having been taken therefrom, the obligation was upon petitioner to defend the appeal. The matter then could and should have been litigated and disposed of. Moreover, subsequent to the determination of the prior appeal by this court (17 A D 2d 804, affd. 13 N Y 2d 776) petitioner moved for reargument and requested a hearing upon the same charges now presented at Special Term. This motion was denied (18 A D 2d 635). Concur — Breitel, J. P., Valente, Stevens, Eager and Bastow, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James R. CASPER, Appellant.

No. 81-2448.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 1982.

Decided May 26, 1982.

*137Neal J. Shapiro, Bernick & Shapiro, Chartered, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.

James M. Rosenbaum, U. S. Atty., Janice M. Symchych, Asst. U. S. Atty., D.Minn., Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee.

William A. Grünewald, Legal Intern.

Before LAY, Chief Judge, HEANEY, Circuit Judge, and BECKER,* Senior District Judge.

*

The Honorable WILLIAM H. BECKER, United States Senior District Judge, Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

James Robert Casper was charged on September 18, 1981, with robbing a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Casper filed a number of pretrial motions, including one to suppress in-court identifications of the defendant by two bank tellers. His motions were denied. Casper was convicted by a jury on November 4, 1981, and was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment.

Casper appeals his conviction on two grounds. He first argues that the tellers’ in-court identifications were unconstitutionally tainted by a previous photographic display. Shortly after the robbery occurred, two of the bank’s tellers were shown a photograph taken by the bank’s surveillance equipment showing the robbery being committed by a man matching the description previously given by one of the tellers. Both tellers positively identified the man in the photograph as the one who robbed the bank. We find no merit in appellant’s contention that this photographic identification procedure was so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. The district court, therefore, properly refused to suppress the tellers’ in-court identifications of the defendant.

Casper’s second contention is that the jury instruction used at trial regarding intent impermissibly shifted the burden of proof to the defendant. We do not agree, and further note that this Court has recently approved the use of the same instruction at issue. *See United States v. Ming Sen Shiue,*650 F.2d 919, 924 (8th Cir. 1981).

Affirmed.
#### 642.1503 Procedures.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 10963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03561]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of Reappointment of FASAB Chair and Member

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive 
Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548, or call 
(202) 512-7350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), and the FASAB Rules 
Of Procedure, as amended in October 2010, notice is hereby given that 
Mr. George Scott has been reappointed to serve as the chair of the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB or ``the Board'') 
beginning January 1, 2021. Mr. Scott's second five-year term will 
conclude on December 31, 2025.
    Notice is also given that Ms. Gila Bronner has been reappointed to 
serve a second five-year term as a member of the Board beginning 
January 1, 2021. Her second five-year term will conclude on December 
31, 2025.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.

    Dated: February 17, 2021.
Monica R. Valentine,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2021-03561 Filed 2-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
Exhibit 32

Chyron Corporation
Certification of
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 of Chyron Corporation (the "Issuer").

We, Michael Wellesley-Wesley, Chief Executive Officer, and Jerry Kieliszak, Chief Financial Officer, of Issuer, each individually, certify that:

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

Dated:  August 11, 2004

| | /s/ Michael Wellesley-Wesley
| | ----------------------------
| | Michael Wellesley-Wesley    
| | President and               
| | Chief Executive Officer     
| |                             
| |                             
| | /s/ Jerry Kieliszak         
| | Jerry Kieliszak             
| | Senior Vice President and   
| | Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.2

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                              PREMCOR PENSION PLAN

     WHEREAS, Premcor Inc. ("Company") previously established the Premcor
Pension Plan ("Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan in Section 12
thereof; and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to reflect that Polymer
Asphalt, L.L.C., a non-controlled group member affiliate of the Company, was a
participating employer in the Plan from January 2, 1995 to October 31, 2002;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended by adding Appendix A to read as
follows:

                                   APPENDIX A

     Notwithstanding the provisions of the Plan to the contrary, the provisions
of this Appendix A shall apply from January 2, 1995 to October 31, 2002.

     1. Employer shall also include Polymer Asphalt, L.L.C.

     2. For purposes of determining an Employee's service for purposes of
eligibility, vesting and entitlement to a distribution due to separation from
service, all periods of service with Polymer Asphalt, L.L.C. and all other
entities required to be aggregated with Polymer Asphalt, L.L.C. under Sections
414(b), (c), (m), or (o) of the Code (collectively, the "Polymer Group") shall
count as service with the Controlled Group.

     3. The limitation on a Participant's Compensation under Code Section
401(a)(17) shall apply separately to Compensation received by a Participant from
the Controlled Group and the Polymer Group.

     4. The provisions of the Plan relating to the nondiscrimination testing
under Code Sections 401(k) and 401(m), the limitation on benefits under Code
Section 415 (taking into account the modification to the term "Controlled Group"
made by Code Section 415(h)) and the top heavy provisions under Code Section 416
shall apply separately to the Controlled Group and the Polymer Group.

     5. The Controlled Group and the Polymer Group will contribute differing
amounts to the Plan based on the Participants employed by members of each
separate controlled group, and forfeitures shall reduce contributions only with
respect to the Employer who employed the Participant on the last day of
employment prior to such forfeiture.

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed by
a duly authorized officer this 29th day of August, 2002.

                                       PREMCOR INC.

                                       By:      /s/ James R. Voss
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Title: Senior Vice President and
                                              Chief Administrative Officer

                                       2
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, W. Marston Becker, Acting Chief Executive Officer of Trenwick Group Ltd.,
hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that this Annual Report on
Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly represents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Trenwick Group Ltd.

Date:  March 31, 2003


/s/ W. Marston Becker
----------------------------------
W. Marston Becker
Acting Chief Executive Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Partnering for Nutrition in School Meals      

# Partnering for Nutrition in School Meals

A new TV feature developed by USDA describes the Team Up for Success Training Initiative, a program that connects schools that have succeeded in instituting the standards of the Healthy Hunger Free Kids Act with schools that are struggling with implementation. 

http://blogs.usda.gov/2014/09/18/team-up-for-success-usda-and-partners-help-secure-a-healthier-school-day/?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
# C_2020182EN.01000401.xml

| 2.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

29 May 2020

(2020/C 182/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1136 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4542 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90088 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4870 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0720 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 150,80 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,7880 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,921 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 348,73 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4495 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8493 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 7,6101 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6681 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5280 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6347 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7863 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5712 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 376,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 19,4239 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9456 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5870 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 269,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8414 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,231 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 78,4416 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,424 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 5,9654 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,5700 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 84,1025 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1136

JPY

Japanese yen

119,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4542

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90088

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4870

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0720

ISK

Iceland króna

150,80

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,7880

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,921

HUF

Hungarian forint

348,73

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4495

RON

Romanian leu

4,8493

TRY

Turkish lira

7,6101

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6681

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5280

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6347

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7863

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5712

KRW

South Korean won

1 376,21

ZAR

South African rand

19,4239

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9456

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5870

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 269,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8414

PHP

Philippine peso

56,231

RUB

Russian rouble

78,4416

THB

Thai baht

35,424

BRL

Brazilian real

5,9654

MXN

Mexican peso

24,5700

INR

Indian rupee

84,1025

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Advisory Committee for International Science and Engineering Meeting (AC-ISE) (#25104).                

*Date and Time:*                     Friday, March 19, 2021, 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).                

*Place:*                     NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 | Virtual Zoom.                

This AC-ISE meeting is fully virtual. All public participants are required to process the meeting registration via Zoom.

*Connect to The Virtual Meeting:*                    Register in advance for the meeting at the Zoom attendee registration link:                     *https://nsf.zoomgov.com/​webinar/​register/​WN_​IRrGAhXcRO2DvpdH7jAVjA.*                     After registering, you will receive a confirmation email with a unique link to join the meeting.                

                    If you have any login questions, please contact Kirk Grabowski, OISE IT Specialist:                     *kgrabows@associates.nsf.gov*.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Christopher Street, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room W-17220, Alexandria, Virginia 22314; Telephone: (703) 292-8568/Email:                     *cstreet@nsf.gov*.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice, recommendations and counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to international programs and activities.                

## Agenda

    - Updates on OISE activities
    - Discussion on Global Leadership in Science, Engineering, and Education
    - Innovative Partnerships
    - Meet with NSF leadership

Dated: February 16, 2021.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2021-03389 Filed 2-18-21; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### 7.303-7.304 [Reserved]
#### Ellen Oquendo, Respondent, v Wilfredo Oquendo, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 505]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), dated December 18, 2002, which, inter alia, directed him to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $200 per week as pendente lite child support and $1,500 per month toward the carrying charges on the marital residence. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, dated July 2, 2003, as, upon reargument, reduced the award of pendente lite child support to $168 per week and otherwise adhered to the original determination *(see*CFLR 5517 [b]).

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated December 18, 2002, is dismissed, as the order was superseded by the order dated July 2, 2003, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated July 2, 2003, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

*688“Modifications of pendente lite maintenance and child support should rarely be made by an appellate court, and then only under exigent circumstances, such as when a party is unable to meet his or her financial obligations, or when justice otherwise requires” *(Chauca v Chauca,*5 AD3d 421, 421-422 [2004]; *Verderame v Verderame,*247 AD2d 609 [1998]; *see Aliano v Aliano,*285 AD2d 522 [2001]; *Smitreski v Smitreski,*251 AD2d 490 [1998]). The husband did not demonstrate that the pendente lite award left him unable to meet his own financial obligations *(see Chauca v Chauca, supra; Aliano v Aliano, supra).*The Supreme Court’s assessment represents an adequate accommodation between the reasonable needs of both parties *(see Aliano v Aliano, supra; Smitreski v Smitreski, supra).*Any inequities perceived by the husband can best be remedied by a speedy trial *(see Chauca v Chauca, supra; Aliano v Aliano, supra; Verderame v Verderame, supra).*Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.