##### Table of Contents





UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-K







|x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 30, 2011

OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from              to

Commission File Number: 000-31715





Jagged Peak, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)







|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Nevada                                                         |  | 91-2007478                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|                                                               | 
|3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 250, Tampa Florida                   |  | 33607                               
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       |  | (Zip Code)                          

Registrants telephone number, including area code: (813) 637-6900





Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|Title of each class:                   
|Common Stock, par value $.001 per share





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.    Yes   ̈    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act.     ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  YES     ̈  NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 ̈  Yes    x  No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form
10-K.     ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act.



|                        |  |                                                  |  |                           |  |  
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------- |  | -
|Large accelerated filer |  |  ̈                                                |  | Accelerated filer         |  |  ̈
|                        |  |                                                  | 
|Non-accelerated filer   |  |  ̈  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |  | Smaller reporting company |  | x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act).    Yes   ̈    No  x

Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,991,524, based on a closing price of $0.25 per share, the registrants common stock on July 1, 2011.

There were 16,305,961 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding as of March 28, 2012.









---

##### Table of Contents

Jagged Peak, Inc.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED

DECEMBER 30, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS



|           |  |          |    |                                                                                                              |  |  |    | 
|---------- |  | -------- | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  | -- | 
|PART I     |  |          |    |                                                                                                             
|           |  | Item 1.  |    | Business                                                                                                     |  |  | 1  | 
|           |  | Item 1A. |    | Risks Factors                                                                                                |  |  | 4  | 
|           |  | Item 1B. |    | Unresolved Staff Comments                                                                                    |  |  | 9  | 
|           |  | Item 2.  |    | Properties                                                                                                   |  |  | 9  | 
|           |  | Item 3.  |    | Legal Proceedings                                                                                            |  |  | 10 | 
|           |  | Item 4.  |    | Mine Safety Disclosures                                                                                      |  |  | 10 | 
|PART II    |  |          |    |                                                                                                             
|           |  | Item 5.  |    | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |  |  | 10 | 
|           |  | Item 6.  |    | Selected Financial Data                                                                                      |  |  | 11 | 
|           |  | Item 7.  |    | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations                        |  |  | 11 | 
|           |  | Item 7A. |    | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk                                                   |  |  | 18 | 
|           |  | Item 8.  |    | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data                                                                  |  |  | 19 | 
|           |  | Item 9.  |    | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure                         |  |  | 37 | 
|           |  | Item 9A. |    | Controls and Procedures                                                                                      |  |  | 38 | 
|           |  | Item 9B. |    | Other Information                                                                                            |  |  | 38 | 
|PART III   |  |          |    |                                                                                                             
|           |  | Item 10. |    | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance                                                       |  |  | 39 | 
|           |  | Item 11. |    | Executive Compensation                                                                                       |  |  | 40 | 
|           |  | Item 12. |    | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters               |  |  | 43 | 
|           |  | Item 13. |    | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Directors Independence                                  |  |  | 44 | 
|           |  | Item 14. |    | Principal Accountants Fees and Services                                                                      |  |  | 45 | 
|           |  | Item 15. |    | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules                                                                   |  |  | 45 | 
|SIGNATURES |  |          | 47 |                                                                                                             



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. The Company has based these forward-looking statements on the Companys current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
assumptions about us and the Companys subsidiaries that may cause the Companys actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, should, could, would,
expect, plan, anticipate, believe, estimate, continue or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a material
difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, including the section entitled Risks Factors and the risks discussed in the Companys other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.



|Item 1. | Business
|------- | --------

OVERVIEW

Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company or Jagged Peak) is an e-commerce software and services company headquartered in Tampa, Florida,
providing Enterprise e-Commerce technology and related fulfillment services. The Companys flagship product, EDGE (Enterprise Dynamic Global Engine), is a web-based software application that enables companies to control and coordinate
multi-channel orders, catalogs, multi-warehouse inventories, and fulfillment across multiple customers, suppliers, employees, and partners in real-time. The Company enables clients to build and operate custom branded portals such as e-commerce,
incentive and rebate programs, customer service, repair and reverse logistics, marketing materials management, and automate other business processes through the use of the EDGE application and its related tools. The EDGE platform has been deployed
in multiple vertical markets such as consumer goods, financial services, healthcare, distribution, travel and tourism and manufacturing.

Jagged Peak continues to market TotalCommerce, an end-to-end solution that enables a company to quickly and cost effectively launch a fully
operational, best practices, e-commerce online channel direct to its consumers. TotalCommerce is an outsourced managed services solution that leverages Jagged Peaks extensive technology and supply chain infrastructure and
provides manufacturers with a turnkey, rapidly deployable solution including e-commerce webstore(s); order, inventory and transportation management software; a North American network of fulfillment centers; back office program management; and a
range of online marketing services.

Jagged Peak operates two fulfillment warehouses in Florida and has a network of 16 independently owned
fulfillment warehouses throughout North America that enables its clients to provide faster delivery service to their customers, while lowering their overall delivery costs. The EDGE application is able to automatically route the orders to the
optimal warehouse based on an established set of factors such as service, cost and priority. This enables our clients to achieve their customer service goals while reducing cost and internal infrastructure.

In July 2009, Jagged Peak began operations in Canada through its wholly owned subsidiary, Jagged Peak Canada, Inc. The operations provide similar
services as in the United States through a network of independently owned fulfillment warehouses, which are managed through technology provided by Jagged Peak, Inc.

There are a variety of risks associated with the Companys ability to achieve strategic objectives, including the ability to increase market penetration, acquire and profitably manage additional
businesses, current reliance on key customers, the risks inherent in expanding, and the intense competition in the industry. For a more detailed discussion of these risks, see Item 1A entitled Risks Factors.

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

According to most
market indicators, e-commerce sales continue to grow at a rapid pace. Many industry analysts predict strong e-commerce growth rates to continue in the U.S., with even higher expected growth rates in European and Asia-Pacific markets. There are a
number of growth factors to be considered: (i) continued adoption of the Internet as a means of commerce; (ii) increased users of high speed internet connections, which enables sellers to create more interactive and customer specific web
portals; (iii) the convenience of buying products online and the ability to have products delivered to the customers destination of choice; (iv) enhancements to online store functionality, enabling the customer additional purchase
options, as well as sellers to quickly take advantage of market fluctuations through immediate price changes and adjustments to sales promotions; (v) improved sellers tracking of customer buying habits and Internet activity, which enables them
to focus marketing efforts and costs on the ideal customer group; and (vi) increased emphasis by sellers on their online businesses.



1



---

##### Table of Contents

Despite the fact that large companies have become more reliant on sophisticated software applications to run
their businesses, many enterprises have been dissatisfied with the return on their investments. Deploying and maintaining new business applications has taken them more time, effort and costs than anticipated. Most companies today have a variety of
order management systems, which are segregated based on different channels, verticals, and/or lines of business. Each system typically has different workflows and order cycles to accomplish the requirements of the business. This leads to a lack of
visibility into customer interactions across the enterprise, and an inability to optimize orders across multiple order systems. For most companies, managing order-to-delivery is largely a manual process that requires numerous staff to pull
information from multiple systems and coordinate order fulfillment with suppliers and logistics providers using phone, fax, e-mail, and Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) messages. These manual systems are expensive to manage, error-prone, not
scalable, and typically break down under the real-time demands and compressed business cycles of todays environment.

COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGES

The Company provides a suite of services to help businesses worldwide grow their revenues and avoid the costs and risks
associated with running a global technology operation in-house. The Company provides vertically integrated e-commerce solutions that include e-commerce, order management, CRM, digital and physical product fulfillment, e-mail marketing and business
process automation. At the core of these services is the Companys proprietary EDGE software. The EDGE application provides a complete multi-channel, multi-distribution center, multi-enterprise, highly functional software solution that can be
deployed in minimal time, requires a lower upfront purchase cost or activation fee, and is easy to use and maintain. As a result, Jagged Peak believes it is able to deliver a complete enterprise commerce management software solution faster and at a
lower cost than the competition. Jagged Peak offers its clients an end-to-end web based order management software solution that has a compelling return-on-investment proposition that is the result of an attractive and flexible transaction-based
pricing model coupled with reduced implementation requirements. The Company believes its EDGE application maintains additional advantages relative to the competition such as complete web-native architecture, platform or vendor independence, highly
scalable solution, role-based hierarchical security, real-time order visibility and ease of use. We believe that we are uniquely positioned to assist our clients to accelerate and manage their growth.

Jagged Peaks web to fulfillment services is what makes the Company unique. Orders captured through the order portal may be processed directly
through the EDGE application (no FTP process) and transmitted to Jagged Peaks warehouse management system in real time for order processing. Transaction data contains all necessary information and instructions to facilitate a fully
executable order. This frictionless processing environment ensures prompt and accurate order fulfillment and data integrity. Order status, inventory activity and carrier shipping manifest data will be automatically uploaded
from Jagged Peaks Warehouse and Transportation management systems to EDGE.

GROWTH STRATEGY

The Companys growth strategy includes:



| |  |  | Increasing Market Share-Jagged Peak believes that it can leverage its success with existing clients to obtain new clients. The
Company has a proven ability to add new client relationships by utilizing its scalable business model to increase its client base while maintaining its ability to provide a high quality software product.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition, the Company believes that current clients will continue to increase their spending on technology solutions in an effort to update legacy
order capture and order management applications that are no longer efficient and will ultimately become obsolete. Jagged Peak expects that its growing number of new client relationships, combined with its proven ability to expand its revenue base
with existing clients, will enable the Company to capture a greater portion of its clients global outsourced e-commerce related expenditures.

Jagged Peak believes that significant opportunities exist to leverage its current client base to increase its penetration in attractive end markets such as consumer retail, financial services &
insurance, healthcare & pharmaceutical, travel & tourism, general manufacturing, and government.



| |  |  | Developing Brand Recognition -The Company must continue to incur expenses to develop the brand of Jagged Peak and
EDGE. The Company intends to leverage the Companys broader set of capabilities with the goal of capturing business opportunities, which would not normally be available to smaller companies.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | Expanding EDGE Application Offerings -Jagged Peak has a proven ability to identify and develop new applications for its EDGE product
offering to meet the needs of the marketplace. The Company plans to continue to diversify its EDGE software platform by adding capabilities such as demand forecasting, marketing data mining, analytical tools and communications, as well as
multi-vendor selection and permissions for purchasing and procurement.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Future Software Product Development -The EDGE application was first released in January of 2000 and has been under continual
development. Significant functionality has been added over the years and the current product is highly functional and robust, yet easy to use and rapidly deployed. Features have been added based on real world demand from clients. The Company plans
to continuously invest in and enhance the EDGE product.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Mergers and Acquisitions Jagged Peak has a strong management team with extensive experience in mergers and acquisitions. The
Company is looking for strategic acquisitions that will expand Jagged Peaks web-based technology services and its clientele.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OPERATIONS AND SERVICES

Software Product and Technology

Jagged Peaks proprietary EDGE application is a highly scalable e-commerce platform that empowers companies to effectively conduct business and
communicate with their customers, on-line business, suppliers, employees and distribution partners. The EDGE application is a web-based, end-to-end transaction processing and information management system that enables companies to achieve complete
automation and total integration of their demand management, e-commerce and related processes. EDGE is comprised of integrated modules that work together seamlessly in real-time.

Custom Software Development

Jagged Peak offers proficiency and demonstrated capability in
all aspects of custom software development, which typically is integrated into our EDGE application. We can confidently provide consulting, analysis, design and architecture, computer programming and development, installation and long term technical
support.

Fulfillment Services

Jagged Peak offers customers a complete turnkey solution, if desired, which can include both physical and digital fulfillment services through warehouses
across North America. EDGE is used for our fulfillment, which includes reporting, warehouse optimization, order fulfillment, return authorizations, back order processing, and full transaction auditing capabilities.

SEASONALITY

Historically, the
Companys revenues and profitability have been subject to moderate quarterly seasonal trends. The first quarter has traditionally been the weakest and the fourth quarter has traditionally been the strongest. Typically, this pattern has been the
result of factors such as, national holidays, customer demand and economic conditions. Additionally, significant portions of the Companys revenues are from clients whose business levels are impacted by seasonality and the economy.

PERSONNEL

At December 30, 2011,
the Company had 126 full time employees. At this time, none of the Companys employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Company recognizes its employees as one of its most valuable asset and provides above industry average
compensation and benefits. The recruitment, training and retention of qualified employees are essential to support continued growth and to meet the service requirements of our clients.

RISK MANAGEMENT

The Company maintains general liability, errors and omissions, property,
property of others and workers compensation insurance. The Company could incur claims in excess of the policy limits or incur claims not covered by the insurance policy.

CORPORATE INFORMATION

Compass Marketing Services, Inc. (Compass), a Florida
corporation, was formed in 1990. On August 22, 2000, Compass merged with IBIS Business Internet Solutions, Inc., a Florida corporation, in a merger of equals and changed its name to Jagged Peak, Inc. In July 2005, Jagged Peak, Inc. completed a
reverse merger with a subsidiary of Absolute Glass Inc., which was incorporated in Nevada in November of



3



---

##### Table of Contents

1999. Absolute Glass, Inc. subsequently amended its articles of incorporation and changed its name to Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company). The Companys principal executive offices
are located at 3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 250, Tampa, Florida 33607. The telephone number is (813) 637-6900 and the Internet website address is www.JaggedPeak.com.



|Item 1A. | Risks Factors
|-------- | -------------

OUR ABILITY TO COMPETE
AND PURSUE STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVES COULD BE JEOPARDIZED IF WE ARE UNABLE TO PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OR INFRINGE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OF OTHERS

We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. We also enter into confidentiality or license agreements
with our employees, consultants and corporate partners and control access to and distribution of our products, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt
to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology. Monitoring unauthorized use of our products is difficult and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology, particularly in foreign
countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. If competitors are able to use our technology, our ability to compete and pursue strategic alternatives effectively could be harmed. Litigation may be
necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights. Any such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could have a material adverse affect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent claims and related litigation regarding patents and other
intellectual property rights. In the course of our business, we may receive claims of infringement or otherwise become aware of potentially relevant patents or other intellectual property rights held by other parties. We evaluate the validity and
applicability of these intellectual property rights, and determine in each case whether we must negotiate licenses or cross-licenses to incorporate or use the proprietary technologies in our products.

Any parties asserting that our products infringe upon their proprietary rights would require us to defend ourselves, and possibly our customers,
manufacturers or suppliers against the alleged infringement. Regardless of their merit, these claims could result in costly litigation and subject us to the risk of significant liability for damages. Such claims would likely be time consuming and
expensive to resolve, would divert management time and attention and would put us at risk to:



| |  |  | Stop selling, incorporating or using our products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Obtain from the owner of the intellectual property right, a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which license may not be available on
reasonable terms, or at all;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Redesign those products that use such technology; or
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Accept a return of products that use such technologies.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------

If we are forced to take any of the foregoing actions, our business may be seriously harmed.

In
addition, we license public domain software and proprietary technology from third parties for use in our existing products, as well as new product development and enhancements. We cannot be assured that such licenses will be available to us on
commercially reasonable terms in the future, if at all. The inability to maintain or obtain any such license required for our current or future products and enhancements could require us to substitute technology of lower quality or performance
standards or at greater cost, either of which could adversely impact the competitiveness of our products.

RECENT GLOBAL TRENDS IN THE
FINANCIAL MARKETS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS, LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL RESULTS

Recent global economic conditions, including
disruption of financial markets, could adversely affect our business and results of operations, primarily through limiting our access to credit, our ability to refinance debt and disrupting our customers businesses, which are heavily dependent
on retail and e-commerce transactions. Although we currently believe that we will be able to obtain the necessary financing in the future, there is no assurance that these institutions will be able to loan us the necessary capital, which could have
a material adverse impact on our business. In addition, continuation or worsening of general market conditions in the United States economy or other national economies important to our businesses may adversely affect our customers level of
spending, ability to obtain financing for purchases and ability to make timely payments to us for our services, which could require us to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts, negatively impact our days sales outstanding and adversely affect
our results of operations.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

OUR LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY

The Company is in the expansion stage and accordingly, the Companys business is subject to the risks inherent in the transition to a mature business. Failure by the Company to develop the ability to
consistently provide high quality products and services to its clients would have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, operating results and financial condition. To address these risks, the Company must, among other things,
respond to competitive developments, attract and motivate qualified personnel, develop market acceptance for its products, establish effective distribution channels, effectively manage growth and continue to improve its proprietary technologies and
successfully commercialize products incorporating such technologies. In addition, the Companys limited operating history makes forecasting difficult.

OUR OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OWN A CONTROLLING INTEREST IN OUR STOCK AND INVESTORS HAVE A LIMITED VOICE IN OUR MANAGEMENT

The Companys executive officers and directors and their affiliates together control more than 70% of the Companys voting shares outstanding. As a result, these stockholders, if they act
together, will be able to control all matters requiring the Companys stockholders approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may delay, prevent or
deter a change in control, and could deprive the Companys stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of the Company or its assets.

WE HAVE EXPERIENCED LOSSES FROM OPERATIONS AND MAY NOT BE PROFITABLE IN THE FUTURE

Jagged
Peak had a net loss of approximately $250,000 for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2011; and had a net profit of approximately $113,100 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. There can be no assurance that the Company will not
incur losses in the future. The Companys operating expenses have increased as the business has grown and can be expected to increase significantly because of expansion efforts. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to generate
sufficient revenue to meet its operating expenditures or operate profitably.

WE ARE DEPENDENT ON A SMALL NUMBER OF CLIENTS FOR A LARGE
PORTION OF OUR SALES AND A LOSS OF ANY CLIENT THAT ACCOUNTS FOR A LARGE PORTION OF OUR REVENUE WOULD CAUSE OUR REVENUE TO DECLINE SUBSTANTIALLY

Sales to one of our clients accounted for approximately 83% of our revenue in 2011, and approximately 85% in 2010. Contracts with our clients are generally two to three years in length. If any key
contract is not renewed or otherwise terminates, particularly this contract, or if revenues from this or other key clients decline for any other reason (such as competitive developments), our revenue would decline and our ability to obtain
profitability would be impaired. It is important to our ongoing success that we maintain these key client relationships and at the same time develop new client relationships.

COMPETITION

Competition in the market for providing transaction management software is
intense. The Companys software products face competition from many larger, more established companies. In addition, other companies could seek to introduce competing products or services and increased competition could result in a decrease in
the price charged by the Companys competitors for their products and services or reduce demand for the Companys products and services, which would have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, operating results and
financial condition. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully with its existing or potential competitors, which may have substantially greater financial, technical, and marketing resources, longer operating
histories, greater name recognition or more established relationships in the industry than the Company. If any of these competitors provides competitive software products and services to the marketplace in the future, the Company cannot be sure that
it will have the resources or expertise to compete successfully.

LACK OF MARKET ACCEPTANCE FOR PRODUCTS

The market for the Companys software may develop at a slower pace than expected as a result of lack of acceptance by companies involved in
implementing a supply-chain execution software system for their business processes. If the market develops more slowly than expected, or if the Companys software products do not achieve significant market acceptance, the Companys
business, operating and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

NEED FOR FURTHER PRODUCT ENHANCEMENTS

Although the Company currently has the capability to achieve installation of its software products for enterprise initiatives, additional ongoing
development is necessary to continue to enhance the quality, efficiency and reliability of the Companys software product offerings. If the Company were unable to continue to develop and install market leading software products, then the
Companys business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.



5



---

##### Table of Contents

INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

In the normal course of business, the Company may enter into contractual relationships with companies located worldwide. Accordingly, the Company may be subject to general geopolitical risks in connection
with some of its contracts, such as political, social and economic instability, changes in diplomatic and trade or business relationships and other factors beyond the Companys control. There can be no assurance that such factors will not
impact the Companys operations in the future.

WE MAY BECOME LIABLE TO CLIENTS WHO ARE DISSATISFIED WITH OUR SERVICES

We design, develop, implement and manage e-commerce solutions that are crucial to the operation of our clients businesses. Defects in the solutions
we develop could result in delayed or lost revenue, adverse end-user reaction, and/or negative publicity, which could require expensive corrections. As a result, clients who experience these adverse consequences either directly or indirectly as a
result of our services could bring claims against us for substantial damages. Any claims asserted could exceed the level of any insurance coverage that may be available to us. Moreover, the insurance we carry may not continue to be available on
economically reasonable terms, or at all. The successful assertion of one or more large claims that are uninsured, that exceed insurance coverage or that result in changes to insurance policies (including premium increases) could adversely affect
our operating results or financial condition.

CHANGES IN GOVERNMENT REGULATION COULD LIMIT OUR INTERNET ACTIVITIES OR RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS OVER THE INTERNET

We are subject to the same federal, state and local laws as other companies conducting business
over the Internet. Today, there are relatively few laws specifically directed towards conducting business over the Internet. The adoption or modification of laws related to the Internet could harm our business, operating results and financial
condition by increasing our costs and administrative burdens. Due to the increasing popularity and use of the Internet, many laws and regulations relating to the Internet are being debated at the international, federal and state levels.

Applicability to the Internet of existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyrights and other intellectual property issues, taxation,
libel, obscenity and personal privacy could also harm our operating results and substantially increase the cost to us of doing business.

LAWS RELATING TO USER INFORMATION AND ONLINE PRIVACY MAY LIMIT THE COLLECTION AND USE OF END-USER DATA FOR OUR CLIENTS

We collect and maintain end-user data for our clients, which subjects us to increasing international, federal and state regulation related to online
privacy and the use of personal user information. For instance Congress has enacted anti-SPAM legislation with which we must comply when providing e-mail campaigns for our clients. Bills are pending in Congress and in various states that address
online privacy protections. Several states have proposed, and some have enacted, legislation that would limit the use of personal user information or require online services to establish privacy policies. In addition, the U.S. Federal Trade
Commission, or FTC, has urged Congress to adopt legislation regarding the collection and use of personal identifying information obtained from individuals when accessing Web sites.

Even in the absence of laws requiring companies to establish these procedures, the FTC has settled several proceedings resulting in consent decrees in which Internet companies have been required to
establish programs regarding the manner in which personal information is collected from users and provided to third parties. We could become a party to a similar enforcement proceeding. These regulatory and enforcement efforts could limit our
collection of demographic and personal information from end-users, which could adversely affect our ability to comprehensively serve our clients.

INTERNET-RELATED STOCK PRICES ARE ESPECIALLY VOLATILE AND THIS VOLATILITY MAY DEPRESS OUR STOCK PRICE OR CAUSE IT TO FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY

The stock market and the trading prices of Internet-related companies in particular, have been notably volatile. This volatility is likely to continue in the short-term and is not necessarily related to
the operating performance of affected companies. This broad market and industry volatility could significantly reduce the price of our common stock at any time, without regard to our operating performance.

INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS DUE TO INCREASED SECURITY MEASURES IN RESPONSE TO TERRORISM

The continued threat of terrorism within the United States and the ongoing military action and heightened security measures in response to such threat has and may cause significant disruption to commerce.
The U.S. economy in general is being adversely affected by terrorist activities and potential activities. Any economic downturn could adversely impact the Companys results of operations, impair the Companys ability to raise capital or
otherwise adversely affect the Companys ability to grow the business. It is impossible to predict how this may affect the Companys business or the economy in the U.S. and in the world, generally. In the event of further threats or acts
of terrorism, the Companys business and operations may be severely and adversely affected or destroyed.

REGULATION

The Companys operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations. Although compliance with these laws and regulations
has not had a material effect on the Companys operations or financial condition, there is no assurance that additions or changes to current laws or regulations will not have a material effect on us, the Companys profitability and
financial condition.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

SUBSTANTIAL ALTERATION OF THE COMPANYS CURRENT BUSINESS AND REVENUE MODEL

The Companys present business and revenue model represents the current view of the optimal business and revenue structure, which is to derive
revenues and achieve profitability in the shortest period. There can be no assurance that current models will not be altered significantly or replaced with an alternative model that is driven by motivations other than near-term revenues and/or
profitability (for example, building market share before the Companys competitors). Any such alteration or replacement of the business and revenue model may ultimately result in the deferring of certain revenues in favor of potentially
establishing larger market share. The Company cannot assure that any adjustment or change in the business and revenue model will prove to be successful.

INABILITY TO MANAGE GROWTH AND INTERNAL EXPANSION

The Company has not yet undergone the
significant managerial and internal expansion that the Company expects will occur, and the Companys inability to manage growth could hurt the results of operations. Expansion of operations will be required to address anticipated growth of the
Companys customer base and market opportunities. Expansion will place a significant strain on the Companys management, operational and financial resources. Currently, the Company has a limited number of employees. The Company will need
to improve existing procedures and controls as well as implement new transaction processing, operational and financial systems, procedures and controls to expand, train and manage the Companys employee base. The Companys failure to
manage growth effectively could have a damaging effect on the Companys business, results of operations and financial condition.

DEPENDENCE ON KEY MANAGEMENT; LOSS OF KEY MANAGEMENT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OPERATIONS

The Companys success depends in part upon retaining the services of certain executive officers, software developers and other key employees. In
addition, because of the Companys growth, the Company is also dependent on its ability to recruit, retain and motivate personnel with technical, marketing, sales and managerial skills. If the Company loses key personnel or is unable to recruit
qualified personnel, the ability to manage the day-to-day aspects of the business will be weakened. The Companys operations and prospects depend in large part on the performance of the senior management team. The loss of the services of one or
more members of the senior management team could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operation. Because the senior management team has exceptional experience with the Company and in the industry, it
would be difficult to replace them without adversely effecting the Companys business operations.

WE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO MEET OR
MAINTAIN ANY LISTING STANDARDS FOR OUR COMMON STOCK TO BE QUOTED ON THE OTC BULLETIN BOARD, WHICH COULD AFFECT OUR STOCKHOLDERS ABILITY TO ACCESS TRADING INFORMATION ABOUT OUR COMMON STOCK

The OTCBB market is separate and distinct from the Nasdaq Stock Market and any national stock exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange or the
American Stock Exchange. Although the OTC Bulletin Board is a regulated quotation service operated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), that displays real-time quotes, last sale prices, and volume information in
over-the-counter (OTC) equity securities like our common stock, we are not required to meet or maintain any qualitative or quantitative standards for our common stock to be quoted on the OTCBB. Our common stock does not presently meet
the minimum listing standards for listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market or any national securities exchange, which could affect our stockholders ability to access trading information about our common stock.

IF WE FAIL TO REMAIN CURRENT ON OUR REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, WE COULD BE REMOVED FROM THE OTC BULLETIN BOARD, WHICH WOULD LIMIT THE ABILITY OF
BROKERDEALERS TO SELL OUR SECURITIES AND THE ABILITY OF STOCKHOLDERS TO SELL THEIR SECURITIES IN THE SECONDARY MARKET

Companies trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, such as us, must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board. If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC Bulletin
Board. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of brokerdealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

VOLATILITY OF THE MARKET PRICE OF THE COMPANYS STOCK

The market price of the Companys common stock may be volatile, which could cause the value of your investment to decline. Any of the following factors could affect the market price of our common
stock:



| |  |  | Changes in earnings estimates and outlook by financial analysts;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Our failure to meet investors performance expectations;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Changes in market valuations of other transportation and logistics companies; or
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



7



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | General market and economic conditions.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | Our small trading volume.
| | - |  | -------------------------

ACCORDING TO THE SEC, THE MARKET FOR PENNY STOCKS HAS SUFFERED FROM PATTERNS OF FRAUD AND ABUSE

Such patterns include:



| |  |  | Control of the market for the security by one or a few brokerdealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Excessive and undisclosed bidask differentials and markups by selling brokerdealers; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and brokerdealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the
inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition, many of the risks described elsewhere in
this Risk Factors section could adversely affect the stock price. The stock markets have experienced price and volume volatility that have affected many companies stock prices. Stock prices for many companies have experienced wide
fluctuations that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of those companies. These types of fluctuations may affect the market price of our common stock.

APPLICABILITY OF LOW PRICED STOCK RISK DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

The Companys common
stock may be considered a low priced security under rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). Under these rules, broker-dealers participating in transactions in low priced securities must first deliver a
risk disclosure document which describes that risks associated with such stock, the broker-dealers duties, the customers rights and remedies, and certain market and other information, and make a suitability determination approving the
customer for low priced stock transactions based on the customers financial situation, investment experience and objectives. Broker-dealers must also disclose these restrictions in writing and provide monthly account statements to the
customer, and obtain specific written consent of the customer. With these restrictions, the likely effect of designation as a low price stock would be to decrease the willingness of broker-dealers to make a market for the stock, to decrease the
liquidity of the stock and to increase the transaction costs of sales and purchase of such stocks compared to other securities.

NO
DIVIDENDS ANTICIPATED

The Company intends to retain all future earnings for use in the development of the Companys business and does
not anticipate paying any cash dividends on the Common Stock in the near future.

IF AN EVENT OF DEFAULT OCCURS UNDER THE SECURITY AND
PURCHASE AGREEMENT, OUR LENDER COULD TAKE POSSESSION OF ALL OUR ASSETS

In connection with our new credit facility with Fifth Third Bank
(Fifth Third), we granted to Fifth Third a first priority security interest in all of our assets. The loan agreement provides that upon the occurrence of an event of default under the agreement, Fifth Third shall have the right to take
possession of the collateral, to operate our business using the collateral, and have the right to assign, sell, lease or otherwise dispose of and deliver all or any part of the collateral, at public or private sale or otherwise to satisfy our
obligations under these agreements. Any attempt by Fifth Third to foreclose on our assets could likewise cause us to curtail our current operations. The new credit facility contains customary covenants, including, among other things, the maintenance
of certain minimum EBITDA levels and fixed coverage ratios. Our ability to satisfy the financial covenants related to our existing or future indebtedness can be affected by events beyond our control, and there is a risk that we will not meet those
covenants. A breach of any such covenants could result in a default under our credit facility or under any other debt instrument that we may enter into in the future.

OUR BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO ONLINE SECURITY RISKS, INCLUDING SECURITY BREACHES

Our
businesses involve the storage and transmission of users proprietary information, and security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, litigation and potential liability. An increasing number of websites,
including several other large Internet companies, have recently disclosed breaches of their security, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly targeted attacks on portions of their sites. Because the techniques used to obtain
unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems, change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. If
an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, public perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose users. A party that is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate our or our
users proprietary information, cause interruption in our operations, damage our computers



8



---

##### Table of Contents

or those of our users, or otherwise damage our reputation and business. Any compromise of our security could result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, significant legal and
financial exposure, damage to our reputation and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could harm our business. Data security breaches may also result from non-technical means, for example, actions by a suborned employee.

Our clients and their customers may authorize us to bill their payment card accounts directly for all transaction fees charged by us. We rely on
encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties to provide the security and authentication to effectively secure transmission of confidential information, including customer payment card numbers. Advances in computer
capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments may result in the technology used by us to protect transaction data being breached or compromised.

Under payment card rules and our contracts with our card processors, if there is a breach of payment card information that we store, we could be liable to the payment card issuing banks for their cost of
issuing new cards and related expenses. In addition, if we fail to follow payment card industry security standards, even if customer information has not been compromised, we could incur significant fines or lose our ability to give customers the
option of using payment cards to fund their payments or pay their fees. If we were unable to accept payment cards, our businesses would be seriously damaged.

Our servers are also vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions, and we have experienced denial-of-service type attacks on our system that have,
in certain instances, made all or portions of our websites unavailable for periods of time. Security breaches, including any breaches of our security measures or those of parties with which we have commercial relationships (e.g., our clients and
third-party service providers) that result in the unauthorized release of users personal information, could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. Our insurance policies carry low coverage
limits, which may not be adequate to reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches.



|Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments
|-------- | -------------------------

Not Applicable



|Item 2. | Properties
|------- | ----------

The Companys executive
offices are located in 12,000 square feet of leased office space located at 3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 250, Tampa, Florida 33607. Monthly rent expense is approximately $24,000 under a lease that expires January of 2015.

In addition, the Company leases approximately 93,000 square feet of warehouse space at 1701 3rdAve. South, St. Petersburg, Florida. The monthly rent expense is
approximately $31,000 per month under a lease that expires in July 2021. The lease agreement is between Jagged Peak and Ridge Rock Partners, LLC,, a group of investors, including officers of Jagged Peak, Paul Demirdjian, Vincent Fabrizzi, and former
Jagged Peak officer, Andrew Norstrud. Ridge Rock Partners purchased the building from the bank that had taken ownership of the building from the previous landlord. The terms of the lease are substantially the same as the terms of the Companys
prior lease with its former landlord.

On August 1, 2011, the Company entered into a six-month lease of approximately 36,000 square feet
of warehouse space at 3001 Gateway Center Parkway, Pinellas Park, Florida 33782. Monthly rent is approximately $15,000 per month until January 31, 2012, after which the Company becomes a month-to-month tenant at a rate of $15,000 per month.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

The following is an annual schedule of approximate future minimum rental payments required under operating
facilities leases that have an initial or remaining non-cancelable lease term in excess of one year as of December 30, 2011 (no longer includes the Pinellas Park warehouse lease):



|            |  |                        |           | 
|----------- |  | ---------------------- | --------- | 
|Year Ending |  | MinimumRental Payments |          
|2012        |  | $                      | 625,400   | 
|2013        |  |                        | 642,300   | 
|2014        |  |                        | 665,400   | 
|2015        |  |                        | 686,700   | 
|2016        |  |                        | 453,600   | 
|Thereafter  |  | $                      | 1,960,800 | 
|            |  |                        |           | 
|Total       |  | $                      | 5,034,200 | 
|            |  |                        |           | 

The Company believes the facilities are in reasonable condition, the correct size, adequately insured and adequately
provide for the Companys immediate and foreseeable needs.



|Item 3. | Legal Proceedings
|------- | -----------------

None.



|Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures
|------- | -----------------------

Not Applicable

PART II



|Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Companys common stock is traded on the OTC bulletin board under the symbol JGPK. The table below sets forth the high and low bid
prices for the Companys common stock for the quarters within 2010 and 2011. Quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.



|                   |  |      |  |                    |     |   |      |  |  |   |      | 
|------------------ |  | ---- |  | ------------------ | --- | - | ---- |  |  | - | ---- | 
|Period             |  | High |  |                    | Low |  
|December 26, 2009  |  | -    |  | March 26, 2010     |     | $ | 0.15 |  |  | $ | 0.08 | 
|March 27, 2010     |  | -    |  | June 25, 2010      |     | $ | 0.10 |  |  | $ | 0.05 | 
|June 26, 2010      |  | -    |  | September 24, 2010 |     | $ | 0.08 |  |  | $ | 0.07 | 
|September 25, 2010 |  | -    |  | December 31, 2010  |     | $ | 0.40 |  |  | $ | 0.07 | 
|January 1, 2011    |  | -    |  | April 1, 2011      |     | $ | 0.14 |  |  | $ | 0.07 | 
|April 2, 2011      |  | -    |  | July 1, 2011       |     | $ | 0.26 |  |  | $ | 0.12 | 
|July 2, 2011       |  | -    |  | September 30, 2011 |     | $ | 0.36 |  |  | $ | 0.20 | 
|October 1, 2011    |  | -    |  | December 30, 2011  |     | $ | 0.75 |  |  | $ | 0.20 | 

The Company had approximately 82 stockholders of record as of March 28, 2012. The Company has never paid cash
dividends on the Companys common stock. The Company intends to keep future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of the Companys business, and the Company does not anticipate that any cash dividends will be paid in the near future.
The Companys future payment of dividends will depend on the Companys earnings, capital requirements, expansion plans, financial condition and other relevant factors.

In 2011, the Companys Board of Directors granted stock option awards to 5 officers to purchase up to 2,150,000 shares of Jagged Peak common stock with an exercise price of $0.13 per common share,
which also approximates the fair market value of the common stock on date of grant and an aggregate market value of approximately $268,750. The options have a term of five years and vest ratably on a monthly basis over a one year period. The grant
of the options was exempt from the registrations provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended because it was a private offering under Section 4(2) thereof.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

In 2011, and as part of the 2009 financing agreement, Moriah Capital L.P. (Moriah) put 775,000
shares of common stock back to Jagged Peak at a fixed price of $0.21 per common share. The Company also issued Moriah 1,000,000 restricted common shares as collateral for the redemption premium related to the 2011 amendment to the Moriah
agreement. The issuance of these shares was exempt from the registrations provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended because it was a private offering under Section 4(2) thereof. The value of the shares was approximately $90,000
based on the closing market price of the common stock $0.09 on March 25, 2011. Moriah has the option, at March 31, 2012 to retain the collateral shares or put the shares to Jagged Peak for the redemption price of $170,000.



|Item 6. | Selected Financial Data
|------- | -----------------------

Not Applicable



|Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This discussion is intended to further the readers understanding of the Companys financial condition and results of operations and should be read in conjunction with the Companys
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere herein. This discussion also contains forward-looking statements. The Companys actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of the risks and uncertainties set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report and in the Companys other SEC filings. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof.
The Company is not party to any transactions that would be considered off balance sheet pursuant to disclosure requirements under Item 303(c) of Regulation S-K.

OVERVIEW

Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company or Jagged Peak) is an
e-commerce software and services company headquartered in Tampa, Florida, providing Enterprise e-Commerce technology and related fulfillment services. The Companys flagship product, EDGE (Enterprise Dynamic Global Engine), is a web-based
software application that enables companies to control and coordinate multi-channel orders, catalogs, multi-warehouse inventories, and fulfillment across multiple customers, suppliers, employees, and partners in real-time. The Company enables
clients to build and operate custom branded portals such as e-commerce, incentive and rebate programs, customer service, repair and reverse logistics, marketing materials management, and automate other business processes through the use of the EDGE
application and its related tools. The EDGE platform has been deployed in multiple vertical markets such as consumer goods, financial services, healthcare, distribution, travel and tourism and manufacturing.

Jagged Peak continues to market TotalCommerce, an end-to-end solution that enables a company to quickly and cost effectively launch a fully
operational, best practices, e-commerce online channel direct to its consumers. TotalCommerce is an outsourced managed services solution that leverages Jagged Peaks extensive technology and supply chain infrastructure and
provides manufacturers with a turnkey, rapidly deployable solution including e-commerce webstore(s); order, inventory and transportation management software; a North American network of fulfillment centers; back office program management; and a
range of online marketing services.

Jagged Peak operates two fulfillment warehouses in Florida and has a network of 16 independently owned
fulfillment warehouses throughout North America that enables its clients to provide faster delivery service to their customers, while lowering their overall delivery costs. The EDGE application is able to automatically route the orders to the
optimal warehouse based on an established set of factors such as service, cost and priority. This enables our clients to achieve their customer service goals while reducing cost and internal infrastructure.

In July 2009, Jagged Peak began operations in Canada through its wholly owned subsidiary, Jagged Peak Canada, Inc. The operations provide similar
services as in the United States through a network of independently owned fulfillment warehouses, which are managed through technology provided by Jagged Peak, Inc.

There are a variety of risks associated with the Companys ability to achieve strategic objectives, including the ability to increase market penetration, acquire and profitably manage additional
businesses, current reliance on key customers, the risks inherent in expanding, and the intense competition in the industry. For a more detailed discussion of these risks, see Item 1A entitled Risks Factors.

Effective January 1, 2003, the Company elected to change its fiscal year end to correspond to accounting periods based on a 52/53 week reporting
year. Therefore, the periods ended December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of 52 and 53 weeks, respectively.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company reviews its estimates, including but not limited to, capitalization of software, work in process,
recoverability of long-lived assets, recoverability of prepaid expenses, valuation on deferred tax assets and allowance for doubtful accounts, on a regular basis and makes adjustments based on historical experiences and existing and expected future
conditions. These evaluations are performed and adjustments are made, as information is available. Management believes that these estimates are reasonable and have been discussed with the audit committee; however, actual results could differ from
these estimates.

Revenue Recognition

There are multiple components in our TotalCommerce solution, which are sold through a master agreement where each individual component is priced separately and distinctly from the other components,
based on market prices at which we sell those services individually. The client is able to choose which services it wishes to purchase. The separate components can be added or deleted at any time during the contract period from pre-determined
prices. We have past history of selling each element separately to establish the market price of each element.

Software development services
include activation, e-commerce site development, application and e-commerce site enhancements, consulting services and other development activities. Additional technology revenue is derived from help desk support, maintenance, general support,
active monitoring and training.

Revenue from software development and technology services is recognized as services are provided or on the
percentage of completion method for those arrangements with specified milestones. The percentage of completion is based on labor hours incurred to total labor hours expected to be incurred. Additional technology revenues are either paid monthly or
on an annual basis. If paid on an annual basis, the revenue is recognized over the year, and if paid on a monthly basis, the revenue is recognized in the month in which the service was provided.

Hosting and managed services contracts range in length from one to three years, and are typically renewed annually after the initial term for subsequent
one year periods. Revenue from hosting and managed services is recognized ratably over the period for which the services are provided. In most cases the fees are either a flat monthly fee or based on the clients use of the system
(transactions).

Our EDGE software is a web-based product and provided to our customers in software as a service model. Revenues are
recognized ratably over the period the service is provided. The method of payment can be based on the clients use of the system (transactions), a flat monthly fee or an annual fee. Revenue for all methods of payment is recognized over the
period the software is available to the client and we are responsible for providing software updates.

We have established vendor specific
objective evidence for the individually priced elements in our contracts through the use of the market as each element in our contracts is sold both as a package and individually with the same pricing. For any element delivered for which vendor
specific objective evidence (VSOE) is not available we use the residual method. When applying the residual method, VSOE of fair value is allocated to each of the undelivered elements and the remaining consideration is allocated to the
delivered elements.

Revenue is also derived from fulfillment service arrangements. Services included under fulfillment arrangements include
account services, handling, order processing, packaging, storage and reporting. These services are based on established monthly charges as well as handling fees based on volume. These revenues are recognized based on the net value of the services
provided.

Certain order processing services are contracted out by us to optimized independent distribution warehouses in North America. All
of these services are managed by us through our order management platform. Since we have the exclusive responsibility to contract and to manage the services provided to our clients by these independent warehouses and the related transportation, the
revenue and expenses are recognized based on the amount of services charged to our client and the related expenses are part of our cost of services.

Work in process represents costs and services which have been provided and properly recognized based on the above policy, however have not been billed to the client.



12



---

##### Table of Contents

Shipping and handling costs are classified as cost of revenues.

Change in Accounting Estimate

Effective
October 1, 2011, the Company changed its estimate of the useful life of its capitalized software (which is amortized on a straight-line basis) from three years to seven years. This change in estimate resulted from the evaluation of the life
cycles of the Companys developed software and the conclusion that its software products consistently have a longer life than previously estimated. We believe that this change in estimate more accurately reflects the productive life of these
assets. The change in useful life has been accounted for as a change in accounting estimate on a prospective basis from October 1, 2011.

As a result of the change in the estimated life of capitalized software, profit before tax and net profit were approximately $64,000 and $40,000 higher,
respectively, for both the fourth quarter and the full year ended December, 30 2011. The per-share effect of this change is $0.00.

Concentration of Risk

Financial
instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, are cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable.

Cash is maintained with two major financial institutions in the United States and Canada. Deposits with these banks may exceed the amount of insurance
provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand, and, therefore, bear minimal risk.

Sales to a single,
multi-national customer with several brands amounted to approximately $25,458,300 or approximately 83% of total revenue and amounted to approximately $18,977,600 or approximately 85% of total revenue during the 52-week period ended December 30,
2011 and the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer was approximately $1,892,000, or approximately 61% of total accounts receivable and approximately $1,517,800 or approximately 78% of total
accounts receivable at December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The risk of this concentration is mitigated as the deferred revenue and customer deposits from this customer at December 30, 2011 and at December 31,
2010 was approximately $1,500,000 and $525,000, respectively. This customer is a large international company with more than one hundred brands and the Company continues to expand its services to additional brands. The Company classifies all business
done for all of this customers brands as one single customer for the concentration of risk calculation.

The Company extends credit to
its various customers based on evaluation of the customers financial condition and ability to pay the Company in accordance with the payment terms. The Company provides for estimated losses on accounts receivable considering a number of
factors, including the overall aging of accounts receivables, customers payment history and the customers current ability to pay its obligation. Based on managements review of accounts receivable and other receivables, an allowance
for doubtful accounts of approximately $298,000 and $60,000 is considered necessary as of December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company charges uncollectible accounts against the allowance account once the invoices are
deemed unlikely to be collectible. The Company does not accrue interest on past due receivables.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the book values and the tax bases of particular assets and liabilities and the tax effects of net operating loss and capital loss
carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets
and liabilities of a change in the tax rate is recognized as income or expense in the period that included the enactment date.

The Company
periodically assesses the recoverability of its deferred tax assets, as necessary, when the Company experiences changes that could materially affect its determination of the recoverability of its deferred tax assets. In conducting this assessment,
management considered a variety of factors, including the Companys operating profits, the reasons for the Companys operating losses in prior years, and managements judgment as to the likelihood of continued profitability and
expectations of future performance, and other factors. Management does not believe that a valuation allowance is necessary; however the amount of deferred tax asset realizable could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income
during the carry forward period are reduced. Net loss carry forwards do not begin to expire until 2018.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Put Options

In 2009, the Company issued 775,000 restricted common shares as partial consideration for a loan obtained from Moriah Capital L.P. (Moriah). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the
governing Securities Issuance Agreement, the holder of such shares had the right, but not the obligation, to put the shares back to the Company at a fixed price of $0.21 per common share on March 18, 2011. The Company accounted for these
shares as a reclassification of the value of the shares from permanent to temporary equity. In 2011, Moriah put the 775,000 shares of common stock back to Jagged Peak at a fixed price of $0.21 per common share.

In 2011, we amended the Moriah loan, and as part of our amended agreement, we issued 1,000,000 restricted common shares to Moriah as collateral for the
redemption premium. Moriah has the option, at March 31, 2012 to retain the collateral shares or put the shares to Jagged Peak for the redemption price of $170,000.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 compared to
the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010.

The following table summarizes selected financial data of the Company:



|                                             |  |      |            |  |      |   |            |        |  |   |           |   |  |  |     |   
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- |  | ---- | - | ---------- | ------ |  | - | --------- | - |  |  | --- | --
|                                             |  | 2011 |            |  | 2010 |   |            | Change |  |   | Percent   |  
|Net revenue                                  |  | $    | 30,534,000 |  |      | $ | 22,224,500 |        |  | $ | 8,309,500 |   |  |  | 37  | % 
|Cost of revenue                              |  |      | 24,808,600 |  |      |   | 17,016,100 |        |  |   | 7,792,500 |   |  |  | 46  | % 
|                                             |  |      |            |  |      |   |            |        |  |   |           |   |  |  |     |   
|Gross profit                                 |  |      | 5,725,400  |  |      |   | 5,208,400  |        |  |   | 517,000   |   |  |  | 10  | % 
|                                             |  |      |            |  |      |   |            |        |  |   |           |   |  |  |     |   
|Selling, general and administrative expenses |  |      | 5,674,500  |  |      |   | 4,525,200  |        |  |   | 1,149,300 |   |  |  | 25  | % 
|                                             |  |      |            |  |      |   |            |        |  |   |           |   |  |  |     |   
|Income from operations                       |  | $    | 50,900     |  |      | $ | 683,200    |        |  | $ | (632,300  | ) |  |  | (93 | %)
|                                             |  |      |            |  |      |   |            |        |  |   |           |   |  |  |     |   

The following table sets forth the Companys capitalization as of December 30, 2011. The table should be read
in conjunction with the Companys financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K filing.



|                                                                                                                                      |  |   |            |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- | -
|Total current liabilities                                                                                                             |  | $ | 7,818,700  |  
|Long-term liabilities                                                                                                                 |  |   | 0          |  
|Temporary equity  Common stock, subject to put rights 1,000,000 shares                                                               |  |   | 170,000    |  
|Common stock; $.001 par value; 70,000,000 shares authorized; 16,305,961 shares issued and 16,183,470 outstanding at
December 30, 2011 |  |   | 16,400     |  
|Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                            |  |   | 3,518,900  |  
|Treasury stock, 122,491 shares                                                                                                        |  |   | (9,000     | )
|Accumulated deficit                                                                                                                   |  |   | (3,388,300 | )
|                                                                                                                                      |  |   |            |  
|Total stockholders equity                                                                                                            |  |   | 138,000    |  
|                                                                                                                                      |  |   |            |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity                                                                                            |  | $ | 8,126,700  |  
|                                                                                                                                      |  |   |            |  

For the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 compared to the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010.

Net revenues increased approximately $8,309,500, or 37%, to approximately $30,534,000 for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011,
as compared to approximately $22,224,500 for the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010. The increase in revenue was



14



---

##### Table of Contents

primarily related to (i) continued growth in order/transaction volume, (ii) an increase in distribution orders, (iii) the newly operating Canadian operation, (iv) growth in
our recurring technology transaction revenue, and (v) new customers. The Canadian operation is similar to our United States fulfillment operation; however, all technology services are still performed and billed from the United States.

Cost of revenue, which consists primarily of labor, software amortization, technology, facilities, postage, freight, and packing supplies,
increased by approximately $7,792,500, or 46%, to approximately $24,808,600 for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011, as compared to approximately $17,016,100 for the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010. As a percentage of
revenues, cost of revenue amounted to approximately 81% of related revenues for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011, as compared with approximately 77% for the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010. The increased cost of revenue
and increase as a percentage of revenue resulted primarily from (i) increased order/transaction volume, (ii) increased orders flowing through the Companys North America distribution network, and (iii) the newly operating
Canadian operation, which has a lower gross margin than the U.S. operation. Executive management continues to change the infrastructure and production methods, and to develop technology enhancements to enable the Company to continue to increase
productivity without significant additional resources and to allow the Company to better capitalize on economies of scale as revenues increase.

Selling, general and administrative expense increased by approximately $1,149,300, or 25%, to approximately $5,674,500 for the 52-week period ended
December 30, 2011 as compared to approximately $4,525,200 for the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily related to (i) increased sales and marketing costs related to a new sales and marketing program,
which includes significant expense related to brand awareness, (ii) recruiting and travel expenses, and (iii) costs related to the implementation of the new warehouse management system. Management expects to continue to reinvest cash flow
from operations into marketing efforts, which is expected to significantly increase leads and new customers.

Interest expense decreased
slightly from $473,900 in 2010 to $418,300 in 2011 due primarily to a decrease in amortized debt issuance costs. The Company expects its interest expense to decrease in 2012 due to its new lower cost credit facility.

Pre-tax net loss was $362,200 for 2011 compared to pre-tax net income of $196,800 for 2010 as a result of the above-mentioned items.

The income tax benefit was approximately $112,200 for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 compared to an income tax expense of approximately
$83,700 for the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010. Differences between the effective tax rate used for 2011 and 2010, as compared to the U.S. Federal and State statutory rate, are primarily due to permanent differences. As of
December 30, 2011, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carry-forwards totaling approximately $4,300,000, which begins to expire in 2018. Management believes that there will be sufficient future earnings to support the more than
likely realization of deferred tax assets in excess of existing taxable temporary differences. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near-term if estimates of future taxable income are reduced.

Basic loss per share from continuing operations for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 was $0.02 per weighted average share,
compared with a basic income of $0.01 per weighted average share for the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010. This was based on 16,197,003 and 16,020,961 weighted average common shares outstanding for the 52-week period ended
December 30, 2011 and the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010, respectively.

USE OF GAAP AND NON-GAAP MEASURES

In addition to results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the Company has included
in this report EBITDA, with EBITDA being defined by the Company as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Company excludes the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, discontinued operations,
and the impact of restructuring and other charges from the computation of EBITDA if applicable. For each non-GAAP financial measure, the Company has presented the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure and has reconciled the non-GAAP
financial measure with such comparable GAAP financial measure.

These non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors to
assist in understanding the underlying operational performance of the Company. Specifically, EBITDA is a useful measure of operating performance before the impact of investing and financing transactions, making comparisons between companies
earnings power more meaningful and providing consistent period-over-period comparisons of the Companys performance. In addition, the Company uses this non-GAAP financial measure internally to measure its on-going business performance and in
reports to bankers to permit monitoring of the Companys ability to pay outstanding liabilities.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

EBITDA

EBITDA for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 was approximately $523,332 compared to approximately $1,046,900 in the comparable period of the prior year. The decrease in the EBITDA directly
relates to the increase in staffing compared to 2010. The Company defines EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization costs. The Company also excludes the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle,
discontinued operations, and the impact of restructuring and other charges from the computation, if applicable. The Company believes EBITDA is a useful measure of operating performance before the impact of investing and financing transactions,
making comparisons between companies earnings power more meaningful and providing consistent comparisons of the Companys performance. In order to provide consistent comparisons of year-over-year EBITDA, the following reconciliation is
provided.



|                              |  |                      |          |   |                   |   |           | 
|----------------------------- |  | -------------------- | -------- | - | ----------------- | - | --------- | 
|                              |  | For the period ended |         
|                              |  | December 30, 2011    |          |   | December 31, 2010 |  
|Net profit (loss) as reported |  | $                    | (250,000 | ) |                   | $ | 113,100   | 
|Income tax expense (benefit)  |  |                      | (112,200 | ) |                   |   | 83,700    | 
|Interest expense              |  |                      | 418,300  |   |                   |   | 473,900   | 
|Depreciation and amortization |  |                      | 467,200  |   |                   |   | 376,200   | 
|                              |  |                      |          |   |                   |   |           | 
|EBITDA                        |  | $                    | 523,300  |   |                   | $ | 1,046,900 | 
|                              |  |                      |          |   |                   |   |           | 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Companys primary cash needs consist of working capital, capital expenditures and debt service. The Companys working capital needs depend upon the timing of collections from customers and
payments to others as well as capital and operating lease payment obligations. Capital expenditures primarily relate to software enhancements and warehouse equipment. The Company reduces capital expenditure requirements by utilizing independent
fulfillment warehouses.

Independent fulfillment warehouses typically provide their own equipment, which reduces capital investment
requirements. For 2011, capital expenditures were $687,800. Capital expenditures for 2011 included $330,100 for warehouse equipment and $357,700 for the software enhancements. The Company currently expects net capital expenditures for 2012 to be
approximately $600,000 as it continues with further software enhancements. Actual amounts could differ materially because of operating needs, growth needs, regulatory changes, covenants in our debt arrangements, other expenses, or other factors.

Debt service consists of interest payments on the outstanding balance of debt. On March 23, 2012, the Company entered into the Senior
Credit Facility (the Facility) with First Third Bank. The Facility provides for a revolving line of credit with a maturity of two years and a maximum borrowing capacity of $3.0 million. The proceeds of the Facility were used to repay all
outstanding indebtedness and fees under the Moriah loan. The Facility is available for general corporate purposes. The Facility is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Companys assets. The Facility contains customary
events of default and covenants including among other things, covenants that restrict but do not prevent the ability of the Company to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or permit liens on assets, pay dividends and repurchase stock,
engage in mergers or acquisitions and make investments and loans.

The Companys primary sources of liquidity for operations during the
2011 and 2010 periods have been cash flow from operations and borrowing availability under the Moriah loan. At December 31, 2011, we had $150,000 of borrowing availability under the Moriah loan. The Company believes that, based on current
operations and anticipated growth, cash flow from operations, together with other available sources of liquidity, will be sufficient to fund anticipated capital expenditures, operating expenses and other anticipated liquidity needs for the next
twelve months. Anticipated debt maturity in 2014, and other unforseen events may require the Company to seek alternative financing, such as restructuring or refinancing long-term debt, selling assets or operations or selling debt or equity
securities. If these alternatives were not available in a timely manner or on satisfactory terms or were not permitted under the debt agreement and the Company defaulted on obligations, its debt could be accelerated and assets might not be
sufficient to repay in full all obligations.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

Cash Flows

The following summarizes our cash flows for 2011 and 2010 as reported in our consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying consolidated financial statements:



|                                                    |  |                         |           |   |      |   |          |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | --------- | - | ---- | - | -------- | -
|                                                    |  | Year Ended December 31, |          
|                                                    |  | 2011                    |           |   | 2010 |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities           |  | $                       | 1,752,000 |   |      | $ | 517,200  |  
|Net cash used in investing activities               |  |                         | (687,800  | ) |      |   | (539,700 | )
|Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |  |                         | (72,700   | ) |      |   | 242,000  |  
|                                                    |  |                         |           |   |      |   |          |  
|Net increase in cash                                |  |                         | 991,500   |   |      |   | 219,500  |  
|                                                    |  |                         |           |   |      |   |          |  
|Cash at beginning of period                         |  |                         | 550,800   |   |      |   | 331,300  |  
|                                                    |  |                         |           |   |      |   |          |  
|Cash at end of period                               |  | $                       | 1,542,300 |   |      | $ | 550,800  |  
|                                                    |  |                         |           |   |      |   |          |  

The company generated $1,752,000 and $517,200 in net cash provided by operating activities in 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The increase in cash provided by operating activities in 2011, compared to 2010, was primarily due to a reduction in days sales outstanding and an increase in customer deposits.

Net cash used in investing activities in 2011 and 2010 was $687,800 and $539,700 respectively. Investing activities for 2011 included $330,100 for warehouse equipment and $357,700 for the software
enhancements. We currently expect net capital expenditures for 2012 to be approximately $600,000 as we continue with further software enhancements.

Net cash used by financing activities was $72,700 in 2011 and provided by financing activities was $242,000 in 2010. In 2011, we redeemed shares held by our lender for $162,800 which was offset by the net
borrowings of $100,000. In 2010, our net borrowings were $250,000.

In December 2009, the Company entered into a Loan and Security agreement
and a Secured Revolving Note with Moriah Capital, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership (Moriah and the Closing), whereby we agreed to a Secured Revolving Term Note (the Note) with one million five hundred thousand
dollars ($1,500,000) availability based on certain criteria. The loan was based on the Companys account receivables and was advanced at a rate of 85% of eligible receivables, in addition to other collateral. The interest rate of the Note is
six percent (6%) above prime with a floor of eleven percent (11.0%) and is paid on a monthly basis. The loan was secured by all of the Companys assets. The entire Principal was payable in March of 2011. The proceeds from the Note
were used to extinguish loans of the Company and provided the necessary working capital to accelerate the Companys growth initiatives. A portion of the Note was secured by the Jagged Peak common stock held by certain stockholders of the
Company.

In March 2011, the Company entered into an amended Loan and Security Agreement with Moriah Capital L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (Moriah and the Closing), whereby we agreed to extend the Term Note (the Note) in the principal amount of one million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000). The new interest rate of the Note was
six percent (6%) above prime with a floor of ten percent (10%) and was paid on a monthly basis. There were no monthly principal payments; a final balloon payment of $1,500,000 was due in March of 2012. The balance on the terms remain
unchanged. A portion of the Note was secured by the Jagged Peak common stock held by certain stockholders of the Company, which could cause a change of control if the Company was to default on the loan.

On March 23, 2012, the Company entered into a Senior Credit Facility with Fifth Third bank (the Facility). The Facility provides for a
revolving line of credit with a maturity of two years and a maximum borrowing capacity of $3.0 million. The proceeds of the Facility were used to repay all outstanding indebtedness under our Moriah note payable, and to pay related fees and expenses.
The Facility is available for general corporate purposes. The Facility is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Companys assets. The Facility contains customary events of default and covenants including among other
things, covenants that restrict but do not prevent the ability of the Company to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or permit liens on assets, pay dividends and repurchase stock, engage in mergers or acquisitions and make investments and
loans.

Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin of 3.00% plus LIBOR. In addition to paying monthly
interest on outstanding principal under the Facility, the Company is required to pay a quarterly unutilized 0.25% commitment fee to the lender, based on the average daily unused balance of the Facility. The Company may voluntarily repay outstanding
loans under the Facility at any time without premium or penalty.



17



---

##### Table of Contents

The Company has embarked on marketing activities, upgrades to technology and increasing infrastructure that
it believes will enhance cash flows and business opportunities in the future. In addition, the Company uses its two owned warehouses to provide a portion of its e-fulfillment services. When the Company outgrows the capabilities of these warehouse
facilities, the Company may elect to outsource these additional fulfillment service arrangements to other warehouse services providers, or elect to add additional warehouse space. The Companys current strategy has been to build a network of
partner warehouses to fulfill the additional order requirements. If the Company elected to add additional warehouse space, we may need to obtain additional financing. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain financing on terms favorable
to the Company or successfully implement infrastructure growth strategies.

Our strategy is to expand through both internal development and
mergers and acquisitions, which will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in implementing our growth strategy or successful obtaining adequate financing on favorable terms
for these strategies.

From time to time the Company may become a defendant in legal proceedings in the normal course of business. Since the
Company has not established a reserve in connection with such claims or any general reserve for legal expenses or claims, any such liability, if at all, would be recorded as an expense in the period incurred or estimated. This amount, even if not
material to the Companys overall financial condition, could adversely affect the Companys results of operations in the period recorded.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting
Standard Board (FASB) revised the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements so that the requirements under GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are the same. The guidance clarifies the
FASBs intent about the application of existing fair value measurements and requires enhanced disclosures, most significantly related to unobservable inputs used in a fair value measurement that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy. The guidance is effective prospectively during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its financial position or results of
operations.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its EITF), the AICPA, and the SEC did not or are not
believed by management to have a material impact on the Companys present or future financial statements.



|Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

Not Applicable



18



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|------- | -------------------------------------------

Consolidated Financial Statements

Jagged Peak, Inc.

For the Fiscal Years Ended December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Contents



|                                                           |  |  |    | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | -- | 
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm    |  |  | 20 | 
|                                                           | 
|Financial Statements:                                      |  |  |    | 
|                                                           | 
|Consolidated Balance Sheets                                |  |  | 21 | 
|Consolidated Statements of Operations                      |  |  | 22 | 
|Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity |  |  | 23 | 
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows                      |  |  | 24 | 
|Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements         |  |  | 25 | 



19



---

##### Table of Contents

Report Of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Jagged Peak, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Jagged Peak,
Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) as of December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the 52-week and 53-week periods then ended,
respectively. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Jagged Peak,
Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the results of their operations and cash flows for the 52-week and 53-week periods ended December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Gregory, Sharer & Stuart, P.A.

St. Petersburg, Florida

March 29, 2012



20



---

##### Table of Contents

Jagged Peak, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets



|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ---------- | - | ---------------- | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  | December 30,2011 |            |   | December 31,2010 |  
|Assets                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Current assets:                                                                                                                                                                                               |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Cash                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  | $                | 1,542,300  |   |                  | $ | 550,800    |  
|Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $298,000 and $60,000 at December 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively                                                                  |  |                  | 2,825,700  |   |                  |   | 1,878,700  |  
|Other receivables, net of allowance of $35,000 and $0 at December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively                                                                                                |  |                  | 468,200    |   |                  |   | 234,100    |  
|Work in process, net of allowance of $30,000 at December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010                                                                                                                       |  |                  | 120,400    |   |                  |   | 194,600    |  
|Deferred tax asset                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |                  | 423,000    |   |                  |   | 290,000    |  
|Other current                                                                                                                                                                                                 |  |                  | 358,400    |   |                  |   | 397,100    |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Total current assets                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                  | 5,738,000  |   |                  |   | 3,545,300  |  
|Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,932,237 and $1,720,500 at December 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively                                                                 |  |                  | 631,900    |   |                  |   | 264,200    |  
|Other assets:                                                                                                                                                                                                 |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|EDGE applications, net of accumulated amortization of $1,864,800 and $1,609,400 at December 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively                                                                      |  |                  | 627,000    |   |                  |   | 524,700    |  
|Deferred tax asset                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |                  | 1,129,800  |   |                  |   | 1,151,500  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Total long-term assets                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |                  | 2,388,700  |   |                  |   | 1,940,400  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Total assets                                                                                                                                                                                                  |  | $                | 8,126,700  |   |                  | $ | 5,485,700  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Liabilities and Stockholders Equity                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Current liabilities:                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Accounts payable, trade                                                                                                                                                                                       |  | $                | 3,731,100  |   |                  | $ | 2,433,700  |  
|Accrued payroll and bonuses                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  | 608,900    |   |                  |   | 410,200    |  
|Other accrued expenses                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |                  | 67,400     |   |                  |   | 104,600    |  
|Deferred rent                                                                                                                                                                                                 |  |                  | 22,800     |   |                  |   | 14,900     |  
|Deferred revenue and customer deposits                                                                                                                                                                        |  |                  | 1,799,000  |   |                  |   | 814,500    |  
|Notes Payable, current portion                                                                                                                                                                                |  |                  | 1,350,000  |   |                  |   | 0          |  
|Capital Lease                                                                                                                                                                                                 |  |                  | 239,500    |   |                  |   | 0          |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Total current liabilities                                                                                                                                                                                     |  |                  | 7,818,700  |   |                  |   | 3,777,900  |  
|Long-term liabilities:                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Long term debt                                                                                                                                                                                                |  |                  | 0          |   |                  |   | 1,250,000  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Total long-term liabilities                                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                  | 0          |   |                  |   | 1,250,000  |  
|Temporary equity  Common stock, subject to put rights 1,000,000 and 775,000 shares at December 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively                                                                  |  |                  | 170,000    |   |                  |   | 162,800    |  
|Stockholders equity:                                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Preferred stock, $.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at December 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010                                                                     |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Common stock, $.001 par value; 70,000,000 shares authorized;16,305,961 shares issued and 16,183,470 outstanding at
December 30, 2011,16,020,961 shares issued and 15,898,470 outstanding at December 31, 2010 |  |                  | 16,400     |   |                  |   | 16,100     |  
|Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |                  | 3,518,900  |   |                  |   | 3,426,200  |  
|Treasury Stock, 122,491 shares                                                                                                                                                                                |  |                  | (9,000     | ) |                  |   | (9,000     | )
|Accumulated deficit                                                                                                                                                                                           |  |                  | (3,388,300 | ) |                  |   | (3,138,300 | )
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Total stockholders equity                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |                  | 138,000    |   |                  |   | 295,000    |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  
|Total liabilities and equity                                                                                                                                                                                  |  | $                | 8,126,700  |   |                  | $ | 5,485,700  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |                  |            |   |                  |   |            |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



21



---

##### Table of Contents

Jagged Peak, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations



|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ | ---------- | - | ------------------------------------ | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                  |  | 52-Week PeriodEndedDecember 
30,2011 |            |   | 53-Week PeriodEndedDecember 
31,2010 |  
|Revenue                                                                           |  | $                                    | 30,534,000 |   |                                      | $ | 22,224,500 |  
|Cost of revenue                                                                   |  |                                      | 24,808,600 |   |                                      |   | 17,016,100 |  
|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  
|Gross profit                                                                      |  | $                                    | 5,725,400  |   |                                      | $ | 5,208,400  |  
|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  
|Selling, general and administrative expenses                                      |  |                                      | 5,674,500  |   |                                      |   | 4,525,200  |  
|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  
|Income from operations                                                            |  | $                                    | 50,900     |   |                                      | $ | 683,200    |  
|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  
|Other (expense) income, net                                                       |  |                                      | 5,200      |   |                                      |   | (12,500    | )
|Interest expense                                                                  |  |                                      | (418,300   | ) |                                      |   | (473,900   | )
|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  
|Profit (loss) before tax expense (benefit)                                        |  | $                                    | (362,200   | ) |                                      | $ | 196,800    |  
|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  
|Provision for income tax expense (benefit)                                        |  |                                      | (112,200   | ) |                                      |   | 83,700     |  
|Net profit (loss)                                                                 |  | $                                    | (250,000   | ) |                                      | $ | 113,100    |  
|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  
|Net income (loss) per common share                                                |  | $                                    | (0.02      | ) |                                      | $ | 0.01       |  
|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  
|Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                              |  |                                      | 16,197,003 |   |                                      |   | 16,020,961 |  
|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  
|Diluted income (loss) per common share                                            |  | $                                    | (0.02      | ) |                                      | $ | 0.01       |  
|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  
|Weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding |  |                                      | 16,197,003 |   |                                      |   | 16,030,527 |  
|                                                                                  |  |                                      |            |   |                                      |   |            |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

Jagged Peak, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity

52-Week Period Ended December 30, 2011 and 53-Week Period Ended December 31, 2010



|                                 |  |              |            |   |                          |   |        |               |  |   |                    |   |  |       |        |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |          |  
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ---------- | - | ------------------------ | - | ------ | ------------- |  | - | ------------------ | - |  | ----- | ------ | - |  | - | ---------- | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                                 |  | Common Stock |            |   | AdditionalPaid
inCapital |   |        | TreasuryStock |  |   | AccumulatedDeficit |   |  | Total |       
|                                 |  | Shares       |            |   | Amount                   |   |        |               |  |  
|Balance, December 25, 2009       |  |              | 15,926,844 |   |                          | $ | 16,000 |               |  | $ | 3,420,100          |   |  | $     | 0      |   |  | $ | (3,251,400 | ) |  | $ | 184,700  |  
|Treasury Stock                   |  |              |            |   |                          |   |        |               |  |   |                    |   |  |       | (9,000 | ) |  |   |            |   |  |   | (9,000   | )
|Issuance of stock                |  |              | 94,117     |   |                          |   | 100    |               |  |   | 900                |   |  |       |        |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 1,000    |  
|Amortization of stock options    |  |              |            |   |                          |   |        |               |  |   | 5,200              |   |  |       |        |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 5,200    |  
|Net profit for the period        |  |              |            |   |                          |   |        |               |  |   |                    |   |  |       |        |   |  |   | 113,100    |   |  |   | 113,100  |  
|                                 |  |              |            |   |                          |   |        |               |  |   |                    |   |  |       |        |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |          |  
|Balance, December 31, 2010       |  |              | 16,020,961 |   |                          | $ | 16,100 |               |  | $ | 3,426,200          |   |  | $     | (9,000 | ) |  | $ | (3,138,300 | ) |  | $ | 295,000  |  
|Redemption of shares             |  |              | (775,000   | ) |                          |   | (800   | )             |  |   | 800                |   |  |       |        |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 0        |  
|Issuance of shares               |  |              | 1,000,000  |   |                          |   | 1,000  |               |  |   | 169,000            |   |  |       |        |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 170,000  |  
|Reclassified to temporary equity |  |              |            |   |                          |   |        |               |  |   | (170,000           | ) |  |       |        |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | (170,000 | )
|Issuance of shares               |  |              | 60,000     |   |                          |   | 100    |               |  |   | 14,900             |   |  |       |        |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 15,000   |  
|Amortization of stock options    |  |              |            |   |                          |   |        |               |  |   | 78,000             |   |  |       |        |   |  |   |            |   |  |   | 78,000   |  
|Net loss for the period          |  |              |            |   |                          |   |        |               |  |   |                    |   |  |       |        |   |  |   | (250,000   | ) |  |   | (250,000 | )
|                                 |  |              |            |   |                          |   |        |               |  |   |                    |   |  |       |        |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |          |  
|Balance, December 30, 2011       |  |              | 16,305,961 |   |                          | $ | 16,400 |               |  | $ | 3,518,900          |   |  | $     | (9,000 | ) |  | $ | (3,388,300 | ) |  | $ | 138,000  |  
|                                 |  |              |            |   |                          |   |        |               |  |   |                    |   |  |       |        |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |          |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

Jagged Peak, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows



|                                                                                         |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- | ---------- | - | ------------------------------------ | - | -------- | -
|                                                                                         |  | 52-Week PeriodEndedDecember 30,2011 |            |   | 53-Week PeriodEndedDecember 
31,2010 |  
|Operating activities                                                                     |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Net profit (loss)                                                                        |  | $                                   | (250,000   | ) |                                      | $ | 113,100  |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net profit (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                                            |  |                                     | 467,200    |   |                                      |   | 376,200  |  
|Amortization of debt costs                                                               |  |                                     | 327,900    |   |                                      |   | 329,000  |  
|Stock option expense                                                                     |  |                                     | 78,000     |   |                                      |   | 5,200    |  
|Issuance of stock to lender for debt fees                                                |  |                                     | 15,000     |   |                                      |   | 0        |  
|Bad debt expense                                                                         |  |                                     | 400,100    |   |                                      |   | 55,800   |  
|Changes in:                                                                              |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Accounts receivable                                                                      |  |                                     | (1,312,100 | ) |                                      |   | (577,000 | )
|Work in process                                                                          |  |                                     | 74,200     |   |                                      |   | (130,600 | )
|Other receivables                                                                        |  |                                     | (269,100   | ) |                                      |   | (3,100   | )
|Deferred tax asset                                                                       |  |                                     | (111,300   | ) |                                      |   | 82,000   |  
|Other assets                                                                             |  |                                     | (119,200   | ) |                                      |   | (122,500 | )
|Accounts payable and accrued expenses                                                    |  |                                     | 1,458,900  |   |                                      |   | 528,000  |  
|Deferred rent                                                                            |  |                                     | 7,900      |   |                                      |   | (39,900  | )
|Deferred revenue and customer deposits                                                   |  |                                     | 984,500    |   |                                      |   | (99,000  | )
|                                                                                         |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                                |  |                                     | 1,752,000  |   |                                      |   | 517,200  |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Investing activities                                                                     |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Acquisition of property and equipment                                                    |  |                                     | (330,100   | ) |                                      |   | (197,900 | )
|Development of software - EDGE platform                                                  |  |                                     | (357,700   | ) |                                      |   | (341,800 | )
|                                                                                         |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                                    |  |                                     | (687,800   | ) |                                      |   | (539,700 | )
|Financing activities                                                                     |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Treasury stock purchase                                                                  |  |                                     | 0          |   |                                      |   | (9,000   | )
|Proceeds from the issuance of stock                                                      |  |                                     | 0          |   |                                      |   | 1,000    |  
|Payments to redeem shares held by lender                                                 |  |                                     | (162,800   | ) |                                      |   | 0        |  
|Payments made on capital lease                                                           |  |                                     | (9,900     | ) |                                      |   | 0        |  
|Proceeds from notes payable and bank notes                                               |  |                                     | 100,000    |   |                                      |   | 250,000  |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities                                      |  |                                     | (72,700    | ) |                                      |   | 242,000  |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Net increase in cash                                                                     |  |                                     | 991,500    |   |                                      |   | 219,500  |  
|Cash, beginning of period                                                                |  |                                     | 550,800    |   |                                      |   | 331,300  |  
|Cash, end of period                                                                      |  | $                                   | 1,542,300  |   |                                      | $ | 550,800  |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information and non-cash financing activities:      |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Equipment obtained through capital lease                                                 |  | $                                   | 249,400    |   |                                      | $ | 0        |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  
|Cash paid during the period for interest                                                 |  | $                                   | 156,100    |   |                                      | $ | 138,000  |  
|                                                                                         |  |                                     |            |   |                                      |   |          |  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

Jagged Peak, Inc.

Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

52-Week Period Ended December 30, 2011 and 53-Week Period Ended December 31, 2010



|1. | General Background Information
|-- | ------------------------------

Jagged Peak, Inc. (the Company or Jagged Peak) is an e-commerce software and services company headquartered in
Tampa, Florida, providing enterprise e-commerce technology and related fulfillment services. The Companys flagship product, EDGE (Enterprise Dynamic Global Engine), is a web-based software application that enables companies to control and
coordinate multi-channel orders, catalogs, multi-warehouse inventories, and fulfillment across multiple customers, suppliers, employees, and partners in real-time. The Company enables clients to build and operate custom branded portals such as
e-commerce, incentive and rebate programs, customer service, repair and reverse logistics, marketing materials management, and automate other business processes through the use of the EDGE application and its related tools. The EDGE platform has
been deployed in multiple vertical markets such as consumer goods, financial services, healthcare, distribution, travel and tourism and manufacturing.

Jagged Peak has continued to market the launch of TotalCommerce, an end to end solution that enables a company to quickly and cost effectively launch a fully operational, best practices, e-commerce
online channel direct to its consumers. TotalCommerce is an outsourced managed services solution that leverages Jagged Peaks extensive technology and supply chain infrastructure and provides manufacturers with a turnkey,
rapidly deployable solution including e-commerce webstore(s); order, inventory and transportation management software; a nationwide network of fulfillment centers; back office program management; and a range of online marketing services.

Jagged Peak operates two warehouses in Florida and has a network of 16 independently owned fulfillment warehouses throughout North America that enables
its clients to provide faster delivery to their customers, while lowering their overall delivery costs. The EDGE application is able to automatically route the orders to the optimal warehouse based on an established set of factors such as service,
cost and priority. This enables our clients to achieve their customer service goals while reducing cost and internal infrastructure.

In July
2009, Jagged Peak began operations in Canada through its wholly owned subsidiary, Jagged Peak Canada, Inc. The operations provide similar services as in the United States through a network of independently owned fulfillment warehouses, which are
managed through technology provided by Jagged Peak, Inc.

Effective January 1, 2003, the Company elected to change its fiscal year end to
correspond to accounting periods based on a 52/53 week reporting year. Therefore, the period ended December 30, 2011 and the period ended December 31, 2010 consist of 52 and 53 weeks, respectively.



|2. | Significant Accounting Policies
|-- | -------------------------------

Use of Estimates

The
Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company reviews its estimates, including but not limited
to, capitalization of software, work in process, recoverability of long-lived assets, recoverability of prepaid expenses, valuation on deferred tax assets and allowance for doubtful accounts, on a regular basis and makes adjustments based on
historical experiences and existing and expected future conditions. These evaluations are performed and adjustments are made, as information is available. Management believes that these estimates are reasonable and have been discussed with the audit
committee; however, actual results could differ from these estimates.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

There are multiple components in our TotalCommerce solution, which are sold through a master agreement where each individual component is priced separately and distinctly from the other components, based
on market prices at which we sell those services individually. The client is able to choose which services it wishes to purchase. The separate components can be added or deleted at any time during the contract period from pre-determined prices. We
have past history of selling each element separately to establish the market price of each element.

Software development services include
activation, e-commerce site development, application and e-commerce site enhancements, consulting services and other development activities. Additional technology revenue is derived from help desk support, maintenance, general support, active
monitoring and training.

Revenue from software development and technology services is recognized as services are provided or on the
percentage of completion method for those arrangements with specified milestones. The percentage of completion is based on labor hours incurred to total labor hours expected to be incurred. Additional technology revenues are either paid monthly or
on an annual basis. If paid on an annual basis, the revenue is recognized over the year, and if paid on a monthly basis, the revenue is recognized in the month in which the service was provided.

Hosting and managed services contracts range in length from one to three years, and are typically renewed annually after the initial term for subsequent
one year periods. Revenue from hosting and managed services is recognized ratably over the period for which the services are provided. In most cases the fees are either a flat monthly fee or based on the clients use of the system
(transactions).

Our EDGE software is a web-based product and provided to our customers in software as a service model. Revenues are
recognized ratably over the period the service is provided. The method of payment can be based on the clients use of the system (transactions), a flat monthly fee or an annual fee. Revenue for all methods of payment is recognized over the
period the software is available to the client and we are responsible for providing software updates.

We have established vender specific
objective evidence for the individually priced elements in our contracts through the use of the market as each element in our contracts is sold both as a package and individually with the same pricing. For any element delivered for which vendor
specific objective evidence (VSOE) is not available we use the residual method. When applying the residual method, VSOE of fair value is allocated to each of the undelivered elements and the remaining consideration is allocated to the
delivered elements.

Revenue is also derived from fulfillment service arrangements. Services included under fulfillment arrangements include
account services, handling, order processing, packaging, storage and reporting. These services are based on established monthly charges as well as handling fees based on volume. These revenues are recognized based on the net value of the services
provided.

Certain order processing services are contracted out by us to optimized independent distribution warehouses in North America. All
of these services are managed by us through our order management platform. Since we have the exclusive responsibility to contract and to manage the services provided to our clients by these independent warehouses and the related transportation, the
revenue and expenses are recognized based on the amount of services charged to our client and the related expenses are part of our cost of services.

Work in process represents costs and services which have been provided and properly recognized based on the above policy, however have not been billed to the client.

Shipping and handling costs are classified as cost of revenues.

Software and Development Enhancements

Software and development enhancements expenses
include costs such as payroll and employee benefit costs associated with product development. The EDGE product platform, including the order management, the warehouse management and the transportation management systems, are continually being
enhanced with new features and functions. Once technological feasibility of new features and functions is established, the cost incurred until release to production are capitalized and were amortized over three-year useful life through
September 30, 2011. Beginning on October 1, 2011, the Company amortized these costs over a seven-year useful life. There was approximately $358,000 capitalized during the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 and there was
approximately $341,800 capitalized during the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010. Amortization expenses related to capitalized software and charged to operations for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 and the 53-week period
ended December 31, 2010 were approximately $255,000 and approximately $203,000, respectively.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand with high quality financial institutions. The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a remaining maturity of less than three months
at the time of purchase as cash equivalents.

Concentration of Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, are cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivables.

Cash is maintained with two major financial institutions in the United States and Canada. Deposits with these banks may exceed the amount of insurance
provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand, and, therefore, bear minimal risk.

Sales to a single,
multi-national customer with several brands amounted to approximately $25,458,300, or approximately 83% of total revenue and amounted to approximately $18,977,600 or approximately 85% of total revenue during the 52-week period ended
December 30, 2011 and the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010, respectively. Accounts receivable from this customer was approximately $1,892,000, or approximately 61% of total accounts receivable, and approximately $1,517,800, or
approximately 78% of total accounts receivable, at December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The risk of this is mitigated as the deferred revenue and customer deposits from this customer at December 30, 2011 and at
December 31, 2010 was approximately $1,500,000 and $525,000, respectively. This customer is a large international company with more than one hundred brands and we continue to expand our services to additional brands. The Company classifies all
revenues from this customers brands as one single customer for the concentration of risk calculation.

The Company extends credit to its
various customers based on evaluation of the customers financial condition and ability to pay the Company in accordance with the payment terms. The Company provides for estimated losses on accounts receivable considering a number of factors,
including the overall aging of accounts receivables the customers payment history and the customers current ability to pay its obligation. Based on managements review of accounts receivable and other receivables, an allowance for
doubtful accounts of approximately $298,000 and $60,000 is considered necessary as of December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company charges uncollectible accounts against the allowance account once the invoices are
deemed unlikely to be collectible. The Company does not accrue interest on past due receivables.

Identified Intangible Assets

The Company reviews identified intangible assets and long-lived assets to be held-and-used for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows over the remaining useful life of a long-lived asset is less than its carrying amount, the asset is
considered to be impaired. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, the Company estimates fair value using the expected future
cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the asset. For the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 and the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010, there was no impairment of intangible
assets.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, principally one to ten years. Accelerated methods are used for tax depreciation.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations when incurred. Betterments and renewals are capitalized. When property and equipment are sold or otherwise disposed of, the asset account and related accumulated depreciation account are relieved,
and any gain or loss is included in operations. Equipment held under capital leases is stated at the present value of the minimum lease payments and amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.



27



---

##### Table of Contents

Depreciation is calculated by the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives of the
related assets:



|                                |  |       |            | 
|------------------------------- |  | ----- | ---------- | 
|                                |  | Years |           
|Furniture and equipment         |  |       | 3-7        | 
|Computer equipment and software |  |       | 1-7        | 
|Warehouse equipment             |  |       | 3-10       | 
|Leasehold improvements          |  |       | Lease term | 

Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The aggregated net fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management. The respective carrying value of certain
on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued expenses and short-term borrowings. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying
values for these financial instruments since they are short-term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are receivable or payable on demand. The fair value of the Companys debt is estimated based upon the quoted
market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company
periodically assesses its tax positions taken for all open tax years and has not identified any uncertain tax positions. The Company is not subject to examination by taxing authorities for years prior to 2008.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes
reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and tax return purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between
the book values and the tax bases of particular assets and liabilities and the tax effects of net operating loss and capital loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in the tax rate is recognized as income or expense in the period that included the
enactment date.

The Company periodically assesses the recoverability of its deferred tax assets, as necessary, when the Company experiences
changes that could materially affect its determination of the recoverability of its deferred tax assets. In conducting this assessment, management considered a variety of factors, including the Companys operating profits, the reasons for the
Companys operating losses in prior years, and managements judgment as to the likelihood of profitability and expectations of future performance, and other factors. Management does not believe that a valuation allowance is necessary;
however the amount of deferred tax asset realizable could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carry forward period are reduced. Net loss carry forwards do not begin to expire until 2018.

Put Options and Temporary Equity

In
2009, the Company issued 775,000 restricted common shares as partial consideration for a loan obtained from Moriah Capital L.P. (Moriah). Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the governing Securities Issuance Agreement, the
holder of such shares had the right, but not the obligation, to put the shares back to the Company at a fixed price of $0.21 per common share on March 18, 2011. The Company accounted for these shares as a reclassification of the value of
the shares from permanent to temporary equity. Pursuant to the 2010 amendment, Moriah put the 775,000 shares of common stock back to Jagged Peak at a fixed price of $0.21 per common share in March 2011.

In 2011, the Company amended its agreement with Moriah. The Company also issued Moriah 1,000,000 restricted common shares as collateral for the
redemption premium Moriah received related to the refinancing of the loan. Moriah has the option until March 31, 2012 to retain the collateral shares or put the shares to Jagged Peak for the redemption price of $170,000.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company
has stock option and stock incentive plans for employees and non-employee directors that provide for grants of restricted stock awards and options to purchase shares of Jagged Peak common stock at exercise prices generally equal to the fair values
of such stock at the dates of grant. The Company recognizes the cost of all share-based payments in the financial statements using a fair-value based measurement method. The Company uses a Black-Scholes model to value its stock option



28



---

##### Table of Contents

grants and expenses the related compensation cost using the straight-line method over the vesting period. The fair value of the stock compensation is determined on the grant date using
assumptions for the expected term, volatility, dividend yield and the risk free interest rate. The period expense is then determined based on the valuation of the options and on estimated forfeitures.

Foreign Currency

Generally, the
functional currency of our international subsidiary is the local currency. The financial statements are translated to U.S. dollars using month-end rates of exchange for assets and liabilities, and average rates of exchange for revenues, costs and
expenses. There were no recorded translation gains or losses for the 52-week period or the 53-week period ended December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Net gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions are recorded as a
component of other expenses.

Earnings per Share

The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. FASB ASC 260 provides for the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per
share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that
could share in the earnings of the Company. Potential common stock shares consist of shares that may arise from outstanding dilutive common stock options and warrants (the number of which is computed using the treasury stock method) and
from outstanding convertible debentures (the number of which is computed using the if converted method). Diluted EPS considers the potential dilution that could occur if the Companys outstanding common stock options, warrants and
convertible debentures were converted into common stock that then shared in the Companys earnings (as adjusted for interest expense, that would no longer occur if the debentures were converted).

The weighted average number of shares was 16,197,003 and 16,020,961 for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 and for the 53-week period ended
December 31, 2010, respectively. The diluted weighted average number of shares was 16,918,905 and 16,030,527 for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 and the 53-week period ended December 31, 2010, respectively.

Common stock equivalents for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 were anti-dilutive due to the net losses sustained by the Company during
this period. Therefore, the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding for the dilutive weighted average share calculation in the period ended December 30, 2011 excludes approximately 751,902 shares that could dilute earnings in future
periods.

Recently Issued Financial Accounting Standards

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) revised the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements so that the requirements under GAAP and International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) are the same. The guidance clarifies the FASBs intent about the application of existing fair value measurements and requires enhanced disclosures, most significantly related to unobservable inputs used in
a fair value measurement that is categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The guidance is effective prospectively during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not anticipate that this
adoption will have a significant impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by
the FASB (including its EITF), the AICPA, and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Companys present or future financial statements.



|3. | Property and Equipment
|-- | ----------------------

Property and equipment consist of:



|                                |  |                  |           |  |                  |   |           | 
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | --------- |  | ---------------- | - | --------- | 
|                                |  | December 30,2011 |           |  | December 31,2010 |  
|Furniture and equipment         |  | $                | 127,200   |  |                  | $ | 119,800   | 
|Computer equipment and software |  |                  | 1,284,200 |  |                  |   | 1,052,800 | 
|Warehouse equipment             |  |                  | 684,000   |  |                  |   | 700,400   | 
|Leasehold improvements          |  |                  | 205,700   |  |                  |   | 111,700   | 
|Capital leases                  |  |                  | 263,100   |  |                  |   | 0         | 
|                                |  |                  |           |  |                  |   |           | 
|Total property and equipment    |  |                  | 2,564,200 |  |                  |   | 1,984,700 | 
|Less accumulated depreciation   |  |                  | 1,932,300 |  |                  |   | 1,720,500 | 
|                                |  |                  |           |  |                  |   |           | 
|                                |  | $                | 631,900   |  |                  | $ | 264,200   | 
|                                |  |                  |           |  |                  |   |           | 



29



---

##### Table of Contents

Depreciation expense for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 and the 53-week period ended
December 31, 2010 was approximately $211,800 and $173,100, respectively and is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.



|4. | Other Assets
|-- | ------------

Other Current Assets includes capitalized debt costs of $91,700 and $76,300 for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 and the
53-week period ended December 31, 2010, respectively.



|5. | Notes Payable and Secured Revolving Note
|-- | ----------------------------------------

Notes payable consist of:



|                                   |  |                  |           |  |                   |   |           | 
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | --------- |  | ----------------- | - | --------- | 
|                                   |  | December 30,2011 |           |  | December 31, 2010 |  
|Moriah Note payable                |  | $                | 1,350,000 |  |                   | $ | 1,250,000 | 
|                                   |  |                  |           |  |                   |   |           | 
|Less current portion               |  |                  | 1,350,000 |  |                   |   | 0         | 
|                                   |  |                  |           |  |                   |   |           | 
|Long-term portion of notes payable |  | $                | 0         |  |                   | $ | 1,250,000 | 
|                                   |  |                  |           |  |                   |   |           | 

Note Payable:

In December 2009, the Company entered into a Loan and Security agreement and a Secured Revolving Note with Moriah Capital, L.P., a Delaware Limited
Partnership (Moriah and the Closing), whereby the Company agreed to a Secured Revolving Term Note (the Note) with one million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) availability based on certain criteria. The
loan is based on the Companys account receivables and is advanced at a rate of 85% of eligible receivables, in addition to other collateral. The interest rate of the Note is six percent (6%) above prime with a floor of eleven percent
(11.0%) and is paid on a monthly basis. The loan is secured by all of the Companys assets. The entire principal was payable in March of 2011. The proceeds from the Note were used to extinguish loans of the Company and provide the
necessary working capital to accelerate the Companys growth initiatives. A portion of the Note is secured by the Jagged Peak common stock held by certain stockholders of the Company.

In connection with the Loan and Security agreement, the Company executed a Securities Issuance agreement. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the governing Securities Issuance Agreement, the Company
issued Moriah 775,000 shares of Jagged Peak common stock along with a put option to put the stock back to the Company at a fixed price of $0.21 per share. In March 2011, Jagged Peak purchased the 775,000 shares of common stock Moriah previously
held for $162,800 and retired them.

In March of 2011, the Company extended the loan agreement with Moriah Capital L.P. through March 31,
2012. The loan is based on the Companys account receivables and is advanced at a rate of 85% of eligible receivables, in addition to other collateral. The interest rate of the Note is six percent (6%) above prime with a floor of ten
percent (10.0%) and is paid on a monthly basis. The loan is secured by all of the Companys assets. The entire Principal is payable in March of 2012.

Pursuant to the new terms and conditions of the Loan and Security agreement, the Company must maintain certain financial Covenants as follows:

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio  Borrower shall maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio on a consolidated basis of not less than 1.5:1.0;



30



---

##### Table of Contents

Funded Debt to EBITDA Ratio Borrower shall maintain a Funded Debt to EBITDA Ratio on a
consolidated basis of not less than 2.0:1.0.

In connection with the extension, the Company agreed to pay Moriah, a closing payment equal to
$60,000 and other minor fees and 1,000,000 shares of Jagged Peak restricted common stock as collateral for the redemption premium. Moriah has the option until March 31, 2012 to retain the collateral shares or put the shares to Jagged Peak for
the redemption premium of $170,000.

On March 23, 2012, the Company entered into a Senior Credit Facility (the Facility) with
Fifth Third Bank. The Facility provides for a revolving line of credit with a maturity of two years and a maximum borrowing capacity of $3.0 million. The proceeds of the Facility were used to repay all outstanding indebtedness under our Moriah note
payable, and to pay related fees and expenses. The Facility is available for general corporate purposes. The Facility is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Companys assets. The Facility contains customary events of
default and covenants including among other things, covenants that restrict but do not prevent the ability of the Company to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or permit liens on assets, pay dividends and repurchase stock, engage in
mergers or acquisitions and make investments and loans.

Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin
of 3.00% plus LIBOR. In addition to paying monthly interest on outstanding principal under the Facility, the Company is required to pay a quarterly unutilized 0.25% commitment fee to the lender, based on the daily unused balance of the Facility. The
Company may voluntarily repay outstanding loans under the Facility at any time without premium or penalty.



|6. | Lease Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
|-- | --------------------------------------------

The Company leases its facilities and certain equipment under operating leases with various terms. The following is a schedule, by
year, of future minimum rental payments required under operating leases that have an initial or remaining noncancelable lease term in excess of one year as of December 30, 2011:



|                     |  |   |           | 
|-------------------- |  | - | --------- | 
|Year Ending December |  |   |          
|2012                 |  | $ | 625,400   | 
|2013                 |  |   | 642,300   | 
|2014                 |  |   | 665,400   | 
|2015                 |  |   | 686,700   | 
|2016                 |  |   | 453,600   | 
|After                |  |   | 1,960,800 | 
|                     |  |   |           | 
|Total                |  | $ | 5,034,200 | 
|                     |  |   |           | 

Rent expense amounted to approximately $749,100 and $662,900 for the 52-week period ended December 30, 2011 and the
53-week period ended December 31, 2010, respectively.

Litigation

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may be a party to a variety of legal actions that affect any business. The Company does not anticipate any of these matters or any matters in the aggregate
to have a material adverse effect on the Companys business or its financial position or results of operations.



31



---

##### Table of Contents

|7. | Income Taxes
|-- | ------------

Significant components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:



|                                   |  |              |          |   |              |   |         |  
|---------------------------------- |  | ------------ | -------- | - | ------------ | - | ------- | -
|                                   |  | Period Ended |         
|                                   |  | December 30, |          |   | December 31, |  
|                                   |  | 2011         |          |   | 2010         |  
|Deferred tax expense (benefit)     |  |              |          |   |              |   |         |  
|Federal                            |  | $            | (99,200  | ) |              | $ | 92,800  |  
|State                              |  |              | (13,200  | ) |              |   | 10,400  |  
|Foreign                            |  |              | 200      |   |              |   | (19,500 | )
|                                   |  |              |          |   |              |   |         |  
|Expense (benefit) for income taxes |  | $            | (112,200 | ) |              | $ | 83,700  |  
|                                   |  |              |          |   |              |   |         |  

The Companys Income tax expense in 2011 included the effect of the Companys federal, state, and foreign tax
benefits. Income taxes are based on the estimation of the annual effective tax rate and evaluations of possible future events and transactions and may be subject to subsequent refinement or revision. The provision for income taxes is different from
that which would be obtained by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes. The items causing this difference are as follows:



|                                                                     |  |              |          |   |              |   |        |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | -------- | - | ------------ | - | ------ | -
|                                                                     |  | Period Ended |         
|                                                                     |  | December 30, |          |   | December 31, |  
|                                                                     |  | 2011         |          |   | 2010         |  
|Tax expense (benefit) at U.S. statutory rate                         |  | $            | (123,100 | ) |              | $ | 66,900 |  
|State income tax expense (benefit), net of federal expense (benefit) |  |              | (13,200  | ) |              |   | 10,400 |  
|Tax on foreign operations different from US rate                     |  |              | 0        |   |              |   | (6,600 | )
|Effect of general non-deductible expenses                            |  |              | 22,400   |   |              |   | 11,000 |  
|Other                                                                |  |              | (27,700  | ) |              |   | 0      |  
|Effect of amortization of employee stock option compensation         |  |              | 29,400   |   |              |   | 2,000  |  
|                                                                     |  |              |          |   |              |   |        |  
|                                                                     |  | $            | (112,200 | ) |              | $ | 83,700 |  
|                                                                     |  |              |          |   |              |   |        |  

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred
tax liabilities at December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:



|                                                  |  |              |           |   |              |   |           |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | --------- | - | ------------ | - | --------- | -
|                                                  |  | December 30, |           |   | December 31, |  
|                                                  |  | 2011         |           |   | 2010         |  
|Current deferred tax assets:                      |  |              |           |   |              |   |           |  
|Allowance for doubtful accounts                   |  | $            | 125,300   |   |              | $ | 22,600    |  
|Work in process reserve                           |  |              | 11,300    |   |              |   | 11,300    |  
|Net operating loss carryforward                   |  |              | 263,400   |   |              |   | 220,000   |  
|Other                                             |  |              | 23,000    |   |              |   | 36,100    |  
|                                                  |  |              |           |   |              |   |           |  
|Total current deferred tax assets                 |  |              | 423,000   |   |              |   | 290,000   |  
|Long-term deferred tax assets (liability):        |  |              |           |   |              |   |           |  
|Net operating loss carryforward                   |  |              | 1,326,000 |   |              |   | 1,348,900 |  
|Intangibles                                       |  |              | (196,200  | ) |              |   | (197,400  | )
|                                                  |  |              |           |   |              |   |           |  
|Total long-term deferred tax assets (liabilities) |  |              | 1,129,800 |   |              |   | 1,151,500 |  
|                                                  |  |              |           |   |              |   |           |  
|Net deferred tax asset                            |  | $            | 1,552,800 |   |              | $ | 1,441,500 |  
|                                                  |  |              |           |   |              |   |           |  



32



---

##### Table of Contents

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than
not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become
deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical performance and projections for future
taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences. The amount of the deferred tax asset
considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced. The Company also has a Canadian net operating loss carryforward of approximately $50,000 which does
not begin to expire until 2029.

As of December 30, 2011, the Company had US (federal and state) net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $4,300,000 to reduce future taxable income, which will expire between 2021 and 2029.

The Company classifies penalty and
interest expense related to income tax liabilities as an income tax expense. There are no interest and penalties recognized in the statement of operations or accrued on the balance sheet.



|8. | Stock Compensation
|-- | ------------------

Overview

The
Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended in July 2008 (the Plan), authorizes the Board of Directors to grant options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock to key employees, officers, directors, and consultants.
The aggregate fair market value of grants to one individual shall not exceed $100,000 during any one calendar year for grants of both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. Options granted under the plan must be exercised within
ten years of the date of grant. The option price payable for the shares of common stock covered by any option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but with regards to incentive stock options, shall not be less than the fair market value of
one share of common stock on the date of grant. The option price for nonstatutory options may be less than the fair market value of common stock on the date of grant only if the Board of Directors determines that special circumstances warrant a
lower exercise price.

The Companys 2000 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes the Board of Directors to grant options to purchase up to
100,000 shares of common stock to any employee or consultant during any one calendar year for both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. Options may be granted to key employees, officers, directors, and consultants. Options
granted under the plan must be exercised within ten years of the date of grant. The option price payable for the shares of common stock covered by any option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but shall in no event be less than the par
value of common stock. The option price payable for the shares of common stock covered by any option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but with regards to incentive stock options, shall not be less than the fair market value of one
share of common stock on the date of grant. The option price for nonstatutory options may be less than the fair market value of common stock on the date of grant only if the committee determines that special circumstances warrant a lower exercise
price.

Stock Option Awards

In 2010, the Companys Board of Directors granted stock option awards to certain employees to purchase up to 400,000 shares of Jagged Peak common stock with an exercise price of $0.08 per common
share and an aggregate market value of approximately $27,200. The options issued under this plan expired in 2011.

In 2011, the Companys
Board of Directors authorized stock option awards to certain officers to purchase up to 2,150,000 shares of Jagged Peak common stock with an exercise price of $0.13 per common share and an aggregate market value of approximately $268,750. The
options have a term of five years and vest over a one year period.

Stock Compensation Expense

The Company uses a Black-Scholes model to value its stock option grants and expenses the related compensation cost using the straight-line method over the
vesting period. The fair value of stock options is determined on the grant date using assumptions for the expected term, expected volatility, dividend yield, and the risk free interest rate. The expected term is primarily based on the contractual
term of the option and Company data related to historic exercise and post-vesting forfeiture patterns, which is adjusted based on managements expectations of future results. The expected term is determined separately for options issued to the
Companys directors and to employees. The Companys anticipated volatility level is



33



---

##### Table of Contents

primarily based on the historic volatility of the Companys common stock, adjusted to remove the effects of certain periods of unusual volatility not expected to recur, and adjusted based on
managements expectations of future volatility, for the life of the option or option group. The Companys model includes a zero dividend yield assumption in all periods, as the Company has not historically paid nor does it anticipate
paying dividends on its common stock. The risk free interest rate is based on recent U.S. Treasury note auction results with a similar life to that of the option. The Companys model does not include a discount for post-vesting restrictions, as
the Company has not issued awards with such restrictions. The period expense is then determined based on the valuation of the options and, at that time, an estimated forfeiture rate is used to reduce the expense recorded. The Companys estimate
of pre-vesting forfeitures is primarily based on the recent historical experience of the Company and is adjusted to reflect actual forfeitures at each vesting date.

The Company values the options at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option model with the following weighted average assumptions for options granted in 2011: the historical dividend rate of 0%; the
risk-free interest rate of approximately 1.84% for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant; the expected term of 5 years which was calculated based on the
Companys historical pattern of options granted are expected to be outstanding; an expected volatility of approximately 275% which was calculated by review of the Companys historical activity as well as comparable peer companies; and an
option exercise experience rate for employees of 50% based on the Companys historical rate of employee options being exercised prior to expiration or termination over the past five years.

The Company values the options at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option model with the following weighted average assumptions for options granted
in 2010: the historical dividend rate of 0%; the risk-free interest rate of approximately 1.35% for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant; the expected term of 5
years which was calculated based on the Companys historical pattern of options granted are expected to be outstanding; an expected volatility of approximately 127% which was calculated by review of the Companys historical activity as
well as comparable peer companies; and an option exercise experience rate for employees of 50% based on the Companys historical rate of employee options being exercised prior to expiration or termination over the past five years.



34



---

##### Table of Contents

The following summarizes the Companys stock option and warrant activity and related information:



|                                          |  |        |            |   |                         |   |           |                                |  |   |      | 
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------ | ---------- | - | ----------------------- | - | --------- | ------------------------------ |  | - | ---- | 
|                                          |  | Shares |            |   | Range of ExercisePrices |   |           | Weighted AverageExercise Price | 
|Outstanding at December 25, 2009          |  |        | 2,357,840  |   |                         | $ | 0.01-2.50 |                                |  | $ | 0.70 | 
|Warrants and options granted              |  |        | 400,000    |   |                         | $ | 0.08      |                                |  | $ | 0.08 | 
|Warrants and options exercised            |  |        | (94,117    | ) |                         | $ | 0.01      |                                |  | $ | 0.01 | 
|Warrants and options cancelled or expired |  |        | (1,162,941 | ) |                         | $ | 0.25-1.28 |                                |  | $ | 0.79 | 
|                                          |  |        |            |   |                         |   |           |                                |  |   |      | 
|Outstanding at December 31, 2010          |  |        | 1,500,782  |   |                         | $ | 0.01-2.50 |                                |  | $ | 0.68 | 
|Options granted                           |  |        | 2,150,000  |   |                         | $ | 0.13      |                                |  | $ | 0.13 | 
|Options exercised                         |  |        | (0         | ) |                         | $ | 0         |                                |  | $ | 0    | 
|Options cancelled or expired              |  |        | (1,415,000 | ) |                         | $ | 0.08-2.50 |                                |  | $ | 0.50 | 
|                                          |  |        |            |   |                         |   |           |                                |  |   |      | 
|Outstanding at December 30, 2011          |  |        | 2,235,782  |   |                         | $ | 0.13      |                                |  | $ | 0.13 | 
|Exercisable at December 30, 2011          |  |        | 1,607,700  |   |                         | $ | 0.01-0.30 |                                |  | $ | 0.13 | 
|Exercisable at December 31, 2010          |  |        | 1,100,782  |   |                         | $ | 0.01-2.50 |                                |  | $ | 0.68 | 

The following table summarizes information about options outstanding and exercisable as of December 30, 2011:



|                      |      |  |                     |  |           |                                  |  |  |                      |  |  |                               |      |  |                   |  |            |                      |  |  |           |  |  |   |      | 
|--------------------- | ---- |  | ------------------- |  | --------- | -------------------------------- |  |  | -------------------- |  |  | ----------------------------- | ---- |  | ----------------- |  | ---------- | -------------------- |  |  | --------- |  |  | - | ---- | 
|                      |      |  | Outstanding Options |  |           | Exercisable Options and Warrants | 
|Range ofExercisePrice |      |  | NumberOutstanding   |  |           | WeightedAverageRemainingLife     |  |  | WeightedAveragePrice |  |  | WeightedAverageRemaining Life |      |  | NumberExercisable |  |            | WeightedAveragePrice | 
|$                     | 0.01 |  |                     |  | 10,782    |                                  |  |  | 38.9 years           |  |  | $                             | 0.01 |  |                   |  | 38.9 years |                      |  |  | 10,782    |  |  | $ | 0.01 | 
|$                     | 0.30 |  |                     |  | 75,000    |                                  |  |  | 1.3 years            |  |  | $                             | 0.30 |  |                   |  | 1.3 years  |                      |  |  | 75,000    |  |  | $ | 0.30 | 
|$                     | 0.13 |  |                     |  | 2,150,000 |                                  |  |  | 1.3 years            |  |  | $                             | 0.13 |  |                   |  | 1.3 years  |                      |  |  | 1,521,918 |  |  | $ | 0.13 | 

As of December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were approximately 1,607,700 and 1,100,782 options
exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of $0.13 and $0.68, respectively. The weighted average fair value of options at the date of grant of the options was approximately $0.13 and $0.07 for 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The following table represents our nonvested stock option activity for the years ended December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:



|                                      |  |                  |            |   |                                         |   |      | 
|------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ---------- | - | --------------------------------------- | - | ---- | 
|                                      |  | Number ofOptions |            |   | Weighted AverageFair ValueAt Grant
Date |  
|Nonvested options - December 25, 2009 |  |                  | 200,000    |   |                                         | $ | 0.25 | 
|                                      |  |                  |            |   |                                         |   |      | 
|Granted                               |  |                  | 400,000    |   |                                         | $ | 0.08 | 
|Vested                                |  |                  | 0          |   |                                         |   |      | 
|Forfeited                             |  |                  | (200,000   | ) |                                         |   | 0.25 | 
|                                      |  |                  |            |   |                                         |   |      | 
|Nonvested options - December 31, 2010 |  |                  | 400,000    |   |                                         | $ | 0.08 | 
|                                      |  |                  |            |   |                                         |   |      | 
|Granted                               |  |                  | 2,150,000  |   |                                         | $ | 0.13 | 
|Vested                                |  |                  | (1,521,918 | ) |                                         |   | 0.13 | 
|Forfeited                             |  |                  | (400,000   | ) |                                         |   | 0.13 | 
|                                      |  |                  |            |   |                                         |   |      | 
|Nonvested options - December 30, 2011 |  |                  | 628,082    |   |                                         | $ | 0.13 | 
|                                      |  |                  |            |   |                                         |   |      | 



35



---

##### Table of Contents

There was an aggregate intrinsic value of approximately $271,000 for options outstanding at
December 30, 2011, based on the Companys closing stock price of $0.25 as of the last business day of the period ended December 30, 2011, which would have been received by the optionees had all options been exercised on that date.
There was an aggregate intrinsic value of approximately $190,000 for options exercisable at December 30, 2011, based on the Companys closing stock price of $.25 as of the last business day of the period ended December 30, 2011, which
would have been received by the optionees had all options exercisable been exercised on that date.

There was no aggregate intrinsic value of
options outstanding at December 31, 2010, based on the Companys closing stock price of $0.07 as of the last business day of the period ended December 31, 2010, which would have been received by the optionees had all options been
exercised on that date. There was no aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable at December 31, 2010, based on the Companys closing stock price of $0.07 as of the last business day of the period ended December 31, 2010, which
would have been received by the optionees had all options exercisable been exercised on that date.

There were no options exercised during the
years ended December 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.



|9. | Equity
|-- | ------

Common Stock

Each
share of common stock is entitled to one vote. The holders of common stock are also entitled to receive dividends whenever funds are legally available and when declared by the Board of Directors (the Board), subject to the prior rights
of the holders of any outstanding senior classes of stock, of which there are currently none. The Company records stock as issued when the consideration is received or the obligation is incurred.

Issuance of Common Stock

In March of
2011, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, under a private sale for the redemption premium related to the refinancing agreement with Moriah. The shares were issued pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the governing Securities Issuance Agreement. Moriah has the option, at March 31, 2012 to retain the collateral shares or put the shares to Jagged Peak for the redemption premium of $170,000.



|10. | Related Party Transactions
|--- | --------------------------

In 2011, subsequent to the lease expiration and to ensure Jagged Peaks ability to renew the warehouse lease under similar terms.
Ridge Rock Partners, LLC, which is owned by a group of investors, including officers of Jagged Peak, purchased the building from the bank that had taken ownership of the building from the previous landlord. Ridge Rock Partners entered into a lease
with Jagged Peak but did not make any substantial changes to the lease Jagged Peak previously had with its former landlord. Rent expense related to this lease agreement was approximately $170,000.

In 2011, certain executives and owners of the Company held a majority ownership share in an entity that was spun-off in 2010 and is now a variable
interest of the Company, as detailed in the Variable Interest Entity disclosure.



|11. | Variable Interest Entity
|--- | ------------------------

At December 30, 2011, the Company holds a variable interest in one entity for which it is not the primary beneficiary. To
determine that the Company is not a primary beneficiary, qualitative and quantitative factors were considered. The Company does not have the power to direct activities of the VIE which most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance.
In addition, the Company does not have an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive residual returns. Therefore, the Company is not required to consolidate the operations of this VIE.

The Companys only VIE at December 30, 2011 is an independent entity that was a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
until it was spun off in 2010. At the date of the spin-off, each shareholder of the Company received 1/10thshares of the new entity per each Company share owned. As a result, the majority owners of the Company are also the majority owners of the variable interest entity.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

The Company has less than a 1% ownership interest in the VIE. The Company is involved with this VIE as a
non-controlling interest. The Companys primary support of the VIE in 2011 was to subsidize a portion of the VIEs operating costs until the VIEs revenues increase or raise sufficient capital to fund its operations. The
Companys maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this unconsolidated VIE is limited to the amount the Company recorded on the balance sheet in Other Receivables, approximately $186,000, less a $30,000 allowance, at
December 30, 2011.

12. Employee Stock Ownership Plan

In 2007, the Company established an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), for the benefit of its employees and to purchase shares of
the Companys common stock from time to time in the open market or in negotiated transactions at prices deemed to be attractive. The Plan was amended as of January 1, 2008. Contributions to the ESOP are made at the discretion of the Board
of Directors. All employees of Jagged Peak that meet the 1,000 hours work requirement are eligible to participate in the ESOP. Under the ESOP, which is 100% Company funded, Jagged Peak allocates contributed shares to participants based on their
eligible annual compensation. Compensation shall include but not be limited to the regular salaries and wages, overtime pay, bonuses, commissions and other amounts paid by Jagged Peak and taxable to the employee. The value or number of Jagged Peak
common stock shares that are contributed to the ESOP on an annual basis is completely subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors. Any cash dividends or distributions paid with respect to shares of the ESOP trust will be retained and
allocated in the same manner as other income of the ESOP trust. Shares held by the ESOP trust will be treated as all other issued and outstanding common shares for earnings per share calculations. For 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized expense of
$0 and $12,500, respectively related to contributions to the ESOP. All ESOP shares are considered outstanding for earnings per share computations.

The ESOP shares were as follows:



|                              |  |            |           |  |            |  |           | 
|----------------------------- |  | ---------- | --------- |  | ---------- |  | --------- | 
|                              |  | 12/31/2011 |           |  | 12/31/2010 | 
|Allocated Shares              |  |            | 1,163,334 |  |            |  | 1,163,334 | 
|Shares Release for Allocation |  |            |          |  |            |  |          | 
|Unreleased Shares             |  |            |          |  |            |  |          | 
|                              |  |            |           |  |            |  |           | 
|Total ESOP Shares             |  |            | 1,163,334 |  |            |  | 1,163,334 | 
|                              |  |            |           |  |            |  |           | 



|13. | Subsequent Event
|--- | ----------------

On March 23, 2012, the Company entered into the Senior Credit Facility (the Facility). The Facility provides for a
revolving line of credit with a maturity of two years and a maximum borrowing capacity of $3.0 million. The proceeds of the Facility were used to repay all outstanding indebtedness under our Moriah note payable, and to pay related fees and expenses.
The Facility is available for general corporate purposes. The Facility is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Companys assets. The Facility contains customary events of default and covenants including among other
things, covenants that restrict but do not prevent the ability of the Company to incur certain additional indebtedness, create or permit liens on assets, pay dividends and repurchase stock, engage in mergers or acquisitions and make investments and
loans.

Borrowings under the Facility bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin of 3.00% plus LIBOR. In addition to paying monthly
interest on outstanding principal under the Facility, the Company is required to pay a quarterly unutilized 0.25% commitment fee to the lender, based on the average daily unused balance of the Facility. The Company may voluntarily repay outstanding
loans under the Facility at any time without premium or penalty.



|Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

None.



37



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures
|-------- | -----------------------

Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the fiscal period ended December 30, 2011 covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based
upon such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as required under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act. This conclusion by the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer does not relate to reporting periods after December 30, 2011.

Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) of the Company. Internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material
effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.

Management, under the supervision of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
evaluation, management concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 30, 2011 under the criteria set forth in the in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Companys registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over
financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only managements report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting occurred during the year ended December 30, 2011, that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.



|Item 9B. | Other Information
|-------- | -----------------

None.



38



---

##### Table of Contents

PART III



|Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|-------- | ------------------------------------------------------

The Companys directors and executive officers as of March 29, 2012 were as follows:



|                    |  |     |    |  |          |                                                                          
|------------------- |  | --- | -- |  | -------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name                |  | Age |    |  | Position
|Paul Demirdjian     |  |     | 51 |  |          | Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President
|Vincent Fabrizzi    |  |     | 54 |  |          | Chief Sales and Marketing Officer, Director                              
|Daniel Furlong      |  |     | 64 |  |          | Chief Operations Officer, Director                                       
|Albert Narvades     |  |     | 41 |  |          | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary  
|Primrose Demirdjian |  |     | 52 |  |          | Director                                                                 

The following is a brief summary of the business experience of the foregoing directors and executive officers.

The following sets forth information concerning the officers and directors, including present principal occupations, other business
experience during the last 5 years, membership on committees of the Board of Directors and directorships in other publicly held companies.

Paul Demirdjian  Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President

Mr. Demirdjian has over twenty years of experience in senior management, including executive positions of Senior Vice President of Operations, Chief
Information Officer and Director for over ten years at Davel Communications, a publicly held telecom company operating private payphones, operator services, and long distance services. Mr. Demirdjian has served on the Board since the inception
of Jagged Peak in 2000 and is married to Primrose Demirdjian, another member of the Board. Mr. Demirdjian attended the University of South Florida, where he was a member of the Engineering Honor Society (Tau Alpha Pi).

Vince Fabrizzi  Chief Sales and Marketing Officer, Director

Prior to joining Jagged Peak, Mr. Fabrizzi was Chief Executive Officer and co-Founder of Compass Marketing Services, a logistics services, warehouse management, and fulfillment services company.
Previously, Mr. Fabrizzi co-founded Paradigm Communications in 1989 with Mr. Furlong, and together over the next eight years they built the company into one of the Southeasts largest nationally recognized advertising agencies with
over 160 employees, $60 million in revenues and an impressive list of Fortune 500 clients. Prior to co-founding Paradigm, Mr. Fabrizzi was a Vice President and Partner at FKQ Advertising. Mr. Fabrizzi has served on the Board since the
inception of Jagged Peak in 2000. Mr. Fabrizzi holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from West Virginia University.

Daniel Furlong
 Chief Operations Officer, Director

Prior to joining Jagged Peak, Mr. Furlong was President and co-Founder with
Mr. Fabrizzi of both Compass Marketing Services and Paradigm Communications. Previously, Mr. Furlong was Vice President of Marketing for Dollar Rent-A-Car of Florida  the largest Dollar Rent-A-Car franchise in the country. During his
tenure, business at the Florida division increased ten-fold. Mr. Furlong has served as an officer and a board member since the inception of Jagged Peak in 2000. Mr. Furlong graduated from the University of Wyoming with both undergraduate
and graduate degrees in Accounting.

Albert Narvades  Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

Mr. Narvades joined Jagged Peak in November 2011 as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. Prior to
joining Jagged Peak, he served as Controller at Vercipia Biofuels, a division of British Petroleum (BP) from February 2010 through November 2011. He also has held various accounting roles at Walter Industries, Inc. (predecessor to Walter Energy,
Inc.) during his nine-year tenure, including serving as Vice President of Finance for their Financial Services Group. Mr. Narvades began his career with Ernst & Young in 1994 and served in various roles there, including Audit Manager,
through 2000. He holds both an undergraduate and a graduate degree in Accounting from the University of Florida, and has been a Florida-licensed Certified Public Accountant since 1995.

Primrose Demirdjian  Director

Primrose Demirdjian is serving as the Companys
Public Relations Director. She currently serves on the board of the Tampa Bay International Business Council and leads the Childrens Cancer Research Group at St. Josephs Childrens Hospital. Prior to her tenure



39



---

##### Table of Contents

as president and co-founder of IBIS (June 1996), an Internet-related company, Mrs. Demirdjian was employed by GTE Data Services, Inc. where she held various administrative and technical
positions. Mrs. Demirdjian is married to Paul Demirdjian, the CEO of the Company. Mrs. Demirdjian has served as an officer and as a board member since the inception of Jagged Peak in 2000. Mrs. Demirdjian holds a Bachelor of Science
in Management Information Systems from Nova Southeastern University of Florida.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee consists of the entire Board, as there are no independent Board members. The Audit Committee reviews the results and scope of the
audit and other services provided by the Companys independent auditors and reviews and evaluates the Companys internal control functions. As an advisory function of the committee, members also participate in financings and review budgets
versus historical results throughout the year. The Board of Directors determined that Dan Furlong qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined under the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation
Committee provides overall guidance to our compensation and benefit programs. The Compensation Committee consists of the entire Board, as there are no independent Board members. The Compensation Committee does not function pursuant to a written
charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The committee administers our stock incentive plans and makes recommendations for issuances.

CODE OF ETHICS

The Companys Board
of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to all of the Companys employees, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Sales and Marketing Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal
Accounting Officer and Controller. A copy of the Companys Code of Ethics is attached as an exhibit to the December 30, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. The Company intends to provide any disclosures that are required by the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or which the Company would otherwise determine to be appropriate, with respect to amendments of, and waivers from the Companys Code of Ethics by posting such disclosures on the Companys Internet
website, www.JaggedPeak.com.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Based solely on the Companys review of copies of forms filed pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company believes that during 2011 all reporting persons timely complied with all filing requirements applicable to them.

Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) requires the Companys directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered
class of the Companys equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and any securities exchanges on which the equities of the Company trade, initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in
ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of these reports.



|Item 11. | Executive Compensation
|-------- | ----------------------

COMPENSATION

General

The Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors is currently composed of all four directors and is not independent.

The Company is engaged in highly
competitive businesses and competes nationally for personnel at the executive and technical staff level. Outstanding candidates are aggressively recruited, often at premium salaries. Highly qualified employees are essential to our success. The
Companys objective is to provide a competitive compensation and work environment that helps attract, retain, and motivate the highly skilled people the Company requires. The Company strongly believes that a considerable portion of the
compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and other top executives must be tied to the achievement of business objectives and overall financial performance, both current and long-term.

The Companys compensation program is based on the philosophy that the total cash compensation should vary with the performance of both the individual and the Company and any long-term incentive
should be closely aligned with the interest of the stockholders.



40



---

##### Table of Contents

There are two cash components of the executives salary, a base salary and a bonus structure that compensates the executive for both their individual performance and the overall Company
performance.

Long-term incentives are generally realized through the granting of stock options to executives and key employees. We have also
granted certain non-qualified options to our executive officers.

The Company implemented an employee stock ownership plan in 2007 for the
benefit of its employees. At this time, the Company has no other long-term incentive plans for its officers and employees.

Stock Options

Stock options are granted to aid in the retention of executive and key employees and to align the interests of executive and key employees
with those of the stockholders. The level of stock options granted (i.e., the number of shares subject to each stock option grant) is based on the employees ability to impact future corporate results. An employees ability to impact
future corporate results depends on the level and amount of job responsibility of the individual. Therefore, the level of stock options granted is proportional to the Companys evaluation of each employees job responsibility. Stock
options are granted at a price not less than the fair market value on the date granted.

The following table sets forth a summary of the
compensation paid for the three fiscal years ended December 30, 2011 to or for the benefit of the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other named executives that are considered the Companys most highly
compensated whose total annual salary and bonus compensation exceeded $100,000 (the Named Executive Officers).

SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE



|                                            |  |                            |      |  |           |  |         |          |  |  |                |  |  |                 |   |  |                          |  |        |          |  |  |        |  |  |  |         | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ---- |  | --------- |  | ------- | -------- |  |  | -------------- |  |  | --------------- | - |  | ------------------------ |  | ------ | -------- |  |  | ------ |  |  |  | ------- | 
|                                            |  | Summary Compensation Table |      |  |           |  |         |          |  |  |                | 
|Name Principal Positions                    |  | YearEnded                  |      |  | Salary($) |  |         | Bonus($) |  |  | StockAwards($) |  |  | OptionAwards($) |   |  | All OtherCompensation($) |  |        | Total($) | 
|Paul Demirdjian, Chairman                   |  |                            | 2011 |  |           |  | 157,300 |          |  |  | 44,500         |  |  |                 |  |  |                          |  | 75,000 |          |  |  | 39,600 |  |  |  | 316,400 | 
|and Chief Executive Officer, Director       |  |                            | 2010 |  |           |  | 218,100 |          |  |  | 5,000          |  |  |                 |  |  |                          |  |       |          |  |  | 20,800 |  |  |  | 243,900 | 
|Vincent Fabrizzi                            |  |                            | 2011 |  |           |  | 147,700 |          |  |  | 48,700         |  |  |                 |  |  |                          |  | 62,500 |          |  |  | 40,600 |  |  |  | 299,500 | 
|Chief Sales and Marketing Officer, Director |  |                            | 2010 |  |           |  | 209,700 |          |  |  | 5,000          |  |  |                 |  |  |                          |  |       |          |  |  | 27,600 |  |  |  | 242,300 | 
|Daniel Furlong                              |  |                            | 2011 |  |           |  | 147,700 |          |  |  | 44,700         |  |  |                 |  |  |                          |  | 62,500 |          |  |  | 39,600 |  |  |  | 294,500 | 
|Chief Operations Officer, Director          |  |                            | 2010 |  |           |  | 205,700 |          |  |  | 5,000          |  |  |                 |  |  |                          |  |       |          |  |  | 18,000 |  |  |  | 228,700 | 
|Andrew J. Norstrud(1)                       |  |                            | 2011 |  |           |  | 147,700 |          |  |  | 39,100         |  |  |                 |  |  |                          |  | 50,000 |          |  |  | 53,500 |  |  |  | 290,300 | 
|Chief Financial Officer                     |  |                            | 2010 |  |           |  | 209,400 |          |  |  | 5,000          |  |  |                 |  |  |                          |  |       |          |  |  | 19,000 |  |  |  | 233,400 | 

The Companys Board appoints the executive officers to serve at the discretion of the Board.



|(1) | Mr. Norstrud served as our Chief Financial Officer until his resignation on October 14, 2011. The amounts include his termination payments.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Directors who are also employees receive no compensation for serving on the Board. The Companys non-employee directors may receive options to purchase shares of common stock at the market price on
the date they are granted, and are entitled to reimbursement of expenses incurred consequential to their service. There has been no (cash or equity) compensation paid in the past two years to non-employee directors.

OPTION GRANTS TO NAMED EXECUTIVES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

During 2011, the board voted to grant a total of two million, one hundred and fifty thousand shares (2,150,000) to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other named executives. The
exercise price was approximately $0.13 per share. The options have a five-year term and vest ratably over one year. During 2010, no options were granted to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or other named executives.



41



---

##### Table of Contents

During 2011 the board did not grate options to employees other than named executives or directors.

During 2010, the board voted to grant a total of four hundred thousand shares (400,000) to other employees other than named executives
or directors. The exercise price was approximately $0.08 per share which was the fair market value on the date of grant. The options have a five-year term and vest over a two-year period and are exercisable only while the employee is employed with
the Company.

STOCK OPTION PLANS

The Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan as Amended in July 2008 (the Plan) authorizes the Board of Directors to grant up to 5,000,000 options to key employees, officers, directors, and
consultants. The aggregate fair market value of grants to one individual shall not exceed $100,000 during any one calendar year for grants of both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. Options granted under the Plan must be
exercised within ten years of the date of grant. The Option Price payable for the shares of Common Stock covered by any Option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but with regards to Incentive Stock Options, shall not be less than the
Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the Date of Grant. The Option Price for Nonstatutory Options may be less than the Fair Market Value of Common Stock on the Date of Grant only if the Committee determines that special circumstances
warrant a lower exercise price.

The Companys 2000 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes up to 100,000 shares of common stock to any employee
or Consultant during any one calendar year for grants of both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to key employees, officers, directors, and consultants. Options granted under the Plan must be exercised within ten years of the
date of grant. The Option Price payable for the shares of Common Stock covered by any Option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but shall in no event be less than the par value of Common Stock. The Option Price payable for the shares of
Common Stock covered by any Option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but with regards to Incentive Stock Options, shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of one share of Common Stock on the Date of Grant. The Option Price for
Nonstatutory Options may be less than the Fair Market Value of Common Stock on the Date of Grant only if the Compensation Committee determines that special circumstances warrant a lower exercise price.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END

The following table summarizes equity awards granted to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other named executive officers that were outstanding as of December 30, 2011.



|                                                                                             |  |                                                    |         |  |                                                                  |  |              |                                                                                      |  |  |                         |  |  |                      |      |                                                   |  |                  |                                                       |  |   |                                                                                           |  |  |                                                                                                          |  |  |  |   |  |  |  |   | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------- | ------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  | ----------------------- |  |  | -------------------- | ---- | ------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | - |  |  |  | - | 
|                                                                                             |  |                                                    |         |  | Option Awards                                                    |  | Stock Awards |                                                                                     
|Name                                                                                         |  | Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingOptions(#)Exercisable |         |  | Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions (#)Unexercisable |  |              | EquityIncentivePlanAwards:Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedUnearnedOptions(#) |  |  | OptionExercisePrice ($) |  |  | OptionExpirationDate |      | NumberofSharesor UnitsofStockThatHaveNotVested(#) |  |                  | MarketValueofSharesorUnitsofStockThatHaveNotVested($) |  |   | EquityIncentivePlanAwards:NumberofUnearnedShares,Units orOtherRightsThatHave
NotVested(#) |  |  | EquityIncentivePlanAwards:Marketor PayoutValue ofUnearnedShares,Units orOtherRightsThatHave
NotVested($) | 
|Paul Demirdjian,Chairman of the Board of Directors,Chief Executive Officer and President (1) |  |                                                    | 600,000 |  |                                                                  |  | 384,658      |                                                                                      |  |  | 215,342                 |  |  | $                    | 0.13 |                                                   |  | 5 yearsfromGrant |                                                       |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |                                                                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|Vincent Fabrizzi, Chief Salesand Marketing Officer, Director (2)                             |  |                                                    | 500,000 |  |                                                                  |  | 320,548      |                                                                                      |  |  | 179,452                 |  |  | $                    | 0.13 |                                                   |  | 5 yearsfromGrant |                                                       |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |                                                                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|Daniel Furlong, Chief Operations Officer, Director (3)                                       |  |                                                    | 500,000 |  |                                                                  |  | 320,548      |                                                                                      |  |  | 179,452                 |  |  | $                    | 0.13 |                                                   |  | 5 yearsfromGrant |                                                       |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |                                                                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|Andrew J. Norstrud, CFO (4)                                                                  |  |                                                    | 400,000 |  |                                                                  |  | 400,000      |                                                                                      |  |  |                        |  |  | $                    | 0.13 |                                                   |  | 5 yearsfromGrant |                                                       |  |  |                                                                                           |  |  |                                                                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 



42



---

##### Table of Contents



|(1) | Consists of a grant made on May 9, 2011 for options to purchase 600,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.13 that expire on May 9, 2016.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Consists of a grant made on May 9, 2011 for options to purchase 500,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.13 that expire on May 9, 2016.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Consists of a grant made on May 9, 2011 for options to purchase 500,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.13 that expire on May 9, 2016.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Consists of a grant made on May 9, 2011 for options to purchase 400,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.13 that expire on May 9, 2016. Mr. Norstrud
served as our Chief Financial Officer until his resignation on October 14, 2011. These options vested immediately upon the date of his resignation.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The
following table sets forth information, as of December 30, 2011, with respect to the Companys stock option plans under which common stock is authorized for issuance, as well as information regarding other compensatory options granted
outside of the Companys stock option plans.



|                                                                                       |  |                                                                                          |           |  |                                                                          |   |      |                                                                                                                                      |  |  |           | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | - | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  | --------- | 
|                                                                                       |  | (a)                                                                                      |           |  | (b)                                                                      |   |      | (c)                                                                                                                                  | 
|Plan Category                                                                          |  | Number of securities tobe issued upon exerciseof outstanding options,warrants and rights |           |  | Weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights |   |      | Number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplan
(excludingsecurities reflected incolumn (a)) | 
|Equity compensation related to 2005 stock option plan that is approved by shareholders |  |                                                                                          | 2,150,000 |  |                                                                          | $ | 0.13 |                                                                                                                                      |  |  | 2,850,000 | 
|Equity compensation not related to a stock option plan                                 |  |                                                                                          | 85,782    |  |                                                                          | $ | 0.26 |                                                                                                                                      |  |  |          | 
|                                                                                       |  |                                                                                          |           |  |                                                                          |   |      |                                                                                                                                      |  |  |           | 
|Total                                                                                  |  |                                                                                          | 2,235,782 |  |                                                                          | $ | 0.13 |                                                                                                                                      |  |  | 2,850,000 | 
|                                                                                       |  |                                                                                          |           |  |                                                                          |   |      |                                                                                                                                      |  |  |           | 

The Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended in July 2008 (the Plan), authorizes the Board of
Directors to grant options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock to key employees, officers, directors, and consultants. The aggregate fair market value of grants to one individual shall not exceed $100,000 during any one calendar year
for grants of both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. Options granted under the plan must be exercised within ten years of the date of grant. The option price payable for the shares of common stock covered by any option shall
be determined by the Board of Directors, but with regards to incentive stock options, shall not be less than the fair market value of one share of common stock on the date of grant. The option price for nonstatutory options may be less than the fair
market value of common stock on the date of grant only if the Board of Directors determines that special circumstances warrant a lower exercise price.

The Companys 2000 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes the Board of Directors to grant options to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock to any employee or consultant during any one calendar year
for both incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options. Options may be granted to key employees, officers, directors, and consultants. Options granted under the plan must be exercised within ten years of the date of grant. The option price
payable for the shares of common stock covered by any option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but shall in no event be less than the par value of common stock. The option price payable for the shares of common stock covered by any
option shall be determined by the Board of Directors, but with regards to incentive stock options, shall not be less than the fair market value of one share of common stock on the date of grant. The option price for nonstatutory options may be less
than the fair market value of common stock on the date of grant only if the committee determines that special circumstances warrant a lower exercise price.



43



---

##### Table of Contents

PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth information known to us, as of the date of this Form 10-K filing, relating to the beneficial ownership of shares of common stock by:



| |  |  | each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Companys outstanding common stock;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | each director;
| | - |  | --------------



| |  |  | each executive officer; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------



| |  |  | all executive officers and directors as a group.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------

Under securities laws, a person is considered to be the beneficial owner of securities owned by him (or certain persons whose ownership is attributed to him) and that can be acquired by him within 60 days
from the date of this Form 10-K filing, including upon the exercise of options, warrants or convertible securities. The Company determined a beneficial owners percentage ownership by assuming that options, warrants or convertible securities
that are held by him, but not those held by any other person, and which are exercisable within 60 days of the date of this Form 10-K filing, have been exercised or converted.

Except with respect to beneficial ownership of shares attributed to the named person, the following table does not give effect to the issuance of shares in the event outstanding common stock purchase
warrants are exercised.

The Company believes that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all
shares of common stock shown as being owned by them. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner in the table set forth below is care of Jagged Peak, Inc., 3000 Bayport Drive, Suite 250, Tampa, Florida 33607.



|                                                           |  |                                          |            |  |                    |  |    |  
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- | ---------- |  | ------------------ |  | -- | -
|Name/Address of Beneficial Owner                           |  | Amount and Nature ofBeneficial Ownership |            |  | Percentageof Class | 
|Paul Demirdjian and Primrose Demirdjian(1)                 |  |                                          | 5,650,084  |  |                    |  | 35 | %
|Daniel Furlong(2)                                          |  |                                          | 3,390,077  |  |                    |  | 21 | %
|Vincent Fabrizzi(3)                                        |  |                                          | 3,390,077  |  |                    |  | 21 | %
|Andrew J. Norstrud(4)                                      |  |                                          | 400,000    |  |                    |  | 2  | %
|                                                           |  |                                          |            |  |                    |  |    |  
|Executive Officers, Directors and others (as a group of 5) |  |                                          | 12,830,238 |  |                    |  | 79 | %



|(1) | All shares are held jointly with Primrose Demirdjian and include 750,000 shares underlying common stock purchase options exercisable at $0.13 per share.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Includes 500,000 shares underlying common stock purchase options exercisable at $0.13 per share.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Includes 500,000 shares underlying common stock purchase options exercisable at $0.13 per share.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | Includes 400,000 shares underlying common stock purchase options exercisable at $0.13 per share.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Directors Independence
|-------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subsequent to the lease expiration and to ensure Jagged Peaks ability to renew the warehouse lease under similar terms, a group of investors, including officers of Jagged Peak, Paul Demirdjian,
Vincent Fabrizzi, and Jagged Peaks former CFO, Andrew Norstrud formed Ridge Rock Partners, LLC to purchase the building from the bank that had taken ownership of the building from the previous landlord. Ridge Rock entered into a lease with the
Company that expires in 2021. The terms of the lease are substantially the same as the terms of the Companys prior lease with its former landlord.

The Company does not have any independent board members and does not expect to add any in 2012. The members of the Board currently own approximately 70% of the Companys common stock and all have a
long history with the Company and in the industry. The Board believes there is sufficient segregation between the Boards financial statement overview responsibilities and the Chief Financial Officers responsibilities for financial
reporting and the Companys compliance responsibilities.



44



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 14. | Principal Accountants Fees and Services
|-------- | ---------------------------------------

Audit Fees

During 2011, our accountants,
Gregory, Sharer & Stuart, P.A., billed us approximately $87,000 for audit work and review of our Form 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filings. During 2010, our accountants, Gregory, Sharer & Stuart, P.A., billed us approximately $78,400 for
audit work and review of our Form 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filings.

Audit Related Fees

None

Tax Fees

During 2011, we were billed by our accountants, Gregory, Sharer & Stuart, P.A., approximately $9,700 to prepare our federal and
state tax returns. During 2010, we were billed by our accountants, Gregory, Sharer & Stuart, P.A., approximately $9,600 to prepare our federal and state tax returns. The audit committee approved all fees.

All Other Fees

None

The Board of Directors has not adopted any pre-approval policies and approves all engagements with the Companys auditors prior to
performance of services by them.



|Item 15. | Exhibits
|-------- | --------



|               |  |                                                                                                                                                                                       
|-------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit
Number |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                           
|2.1            |  | Acquisition and Plan of Merger (filed as exhibit 2.1 to the form 8k filed with the SEC on July 11, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)                                         
|               | 
|3.1            |  | Articles of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10SB12G filed with the SEC on October 10, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference)                                     
|               | 
|3.2            |  | Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10, 2008, and incorporated herein by
reference)           
|               | 
|3.3            |  | Amended and Restated By-Laws (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 04, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference)                                   
|               | 
|10.1           |  | Security and Purchase Agreement (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)         
|               | 
|10.2           |  | Secured Convertible Term Note (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)           
|               | 
|10.3           |  | Secured Revolving Note (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)                  
|               | 
|10.4           |  | Registration Rights Agreement (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)           
|               | 
|10.5           |  | Intellectual Property Security Agreement (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|               | 
|10.6*          |  | Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)           



45



---

##### Table of Contents

|       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|       | 
|10.7*  |  | 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference)                                        
|       | 
|10.8*  |  | 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference)                                        
|       | 
|10.9*  |  | Andrew J. Norstrud Employment Agreement (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference)                          
|       | 
|10.10* |  | 2005 Stock Incentive Plan as Amended July 2008 (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2008 and incorporated
herein by reference)               
|       | 
|10.11* |  | Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as amended January 2008 (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2008 and
incorporated herein by reference)       
|       | 
|10.12  |  | Loan and Security Agreement (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and incorporated herein by
reference)                                      
|       | 
|10.13  |  | Securities Issuance Agreement (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and incorporated herein by
reference)                                    
|       | 
|10.14  |  | Secured Revolving Loan Note (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and incorporated herein by
reference)                                      
|       | 
|10.15  |  | Trademark Collateral Assignment and Security Agreement (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and incorporated
herein by reference)           
|       | 
|10.16  |  | Patent and Trademark Security Agreement (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)                          
|       | 
|10.17  |  | Amendment No. 1 to Loan and Security Agreement and Loan Documents (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and
incorporated herein by reference)
|       | 
|10.18  |  | Securities Issuance Agreement No. 2 (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and incorporated herein by
reference)                              
|       | 
|10.19  |  | Amended and Restated Secured Revolving Loan Note (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and incorporated herein
by reference)                 
|       | 
|10.20  |  | Employment Agreement dated November 21, 2011 between the Company and Albert Narvades                                                                                                                           
|       | 
|10.21  |  | Lease agreement dated August 1, 2011 between the Company and Ridge Rock Partners, LLC                                                                                                                          
|       | 
|10.22  |  | Loan Agreement  Revolving Line of Credit dated March 23rd, 2012 between the Company and Fifth Third Bank                                                                                                      
|       | 
|14.1   |  | Executive Management Code of Ethics (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference)                              
|       | 
|14.2   |  | Company Code of Conduct (Included as an exhibit to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference)                                          
|       | 
|31.1   |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                                                             
|       | 
|31.2   |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                                                             
|       | 
|32.1   |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                            
|       | 
|32.2   |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                            



|* | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



46



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized, in the City of Tampa, State of Florida, on March 29, 2012.



JAGGED PEAK, INC.BY:

/s/    PAUL
DEMIRDJIANPaul Demirdjian(Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President )BY:

/s/    ALBERT
NARVADESAlbert Narvades(Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary)


PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THIS REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE
FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED.



|                                               |  |                                                                           |  |               
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|SIGNATURE                                      |  | TITLE                                                                     |  | DATE          
|                                               |  |                                                                          
|/s/    PAUL
DEMIRDJIAN Paul Demirdjian         |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President |  | March 29, 2012
|                                               |  |                                                                          
|/s/    VINCENT
FABRIZZI Vincent Fabrizzi       |  | Chief Sales and Marketing Officer, Director                               |  | March 29, 2012
|                                               |  |                                                                          
|/s/    DANIEL
FURLONG Daniel Furlong           |  | Chief Operations Officer, Director                                        |  | March 29, 2012
|                                               |  |                                                                          
|/s/    PRIMROSE
DEMIRDJIAN Primrose Demirdjian |  | Director                                                                  |  | March 29, 2012



47