alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Podcast: Tips for Helping Children and Youth Cope in the Aftermath of Disasters      

# Podcast: Tips for Helping Children and Youth Cope in the Aftermath of Disasters

This podcast identifies common reactions of children and youth to disaster and trauma, discusses helpful approaches to support young people’s recovery, and presents examples of how communities that have experienced traumatic events—such as the shooting incident at Virginia Tech—have used coping strategies to promote resilience.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4GftUhGAtc&list=PLBXgZMI_zqfRcTt9ndxkbieQ-pQslk-R6
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JORGEN MANUEL RAMIREZ

ALVAREZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72354

Agency No. A094-041-052

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Jorgen Manuel Ramirez Alvarez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions

for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

FILED

JUN 27 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-72354

removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that no exceptions

applied to excuse Alvarez’s untimely asylum application, filed approximately ten

years late. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B) (requiring petitioner to apply for asylum

within one year of arrival in United States unless prevented by extraordinary

circumstances or changed circumstances materially affecting eligibility for relief);

Toj-Culpatan v. Holder, 612 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam).

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s denial of withholding of removal

because Alvarez failed to show his alleged persecutors threatened him on account

of a protected ground. His fear of future persecution based on an actual or imputed

anti-gang or anti-crime opinion is not on account of the protected ground of either

membership in a particular social group or political opinion. Ramos Barrios v.

Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 854-56 (9th Cir. 2009); Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d

738, 745-46 (9th Cir. 2008); see Ochave v. INS, 254 F.3d 859, 865 (9th Cir. 2001)

(“Asylum generally is not available to victims of civil strife, unless they are singled

out on account of a protected ground.”)

Substantial evidence also supports the Board’s denial of CAT relief based on

the Board’s finding that Alvarez did not establish a likelihood of torture by, at the
3 10-72354

instigation of, or with the consent or acquiescence of the Honduran government. 

See Arteaga v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 940, 948-49 (9th Cir. 2007).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
833.211 Contracting officer's decision. ( a ) For purposes of appealing a VA contracting officer's final decision, the Board of Contract Appeals referenced in FAR 33.211(a) and elsewhere in this subpart is the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405.
#### In the Matter of 442 West 45th Street, Inc., Appellant, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent.

[776 NYS2d 277]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Paula J. Omansky, J.), entered on or about April 21, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination by respondent New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR), dated September 19, 2002, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Because petitioner did not raise the issue of the apartment’s status under the rent laws in its response to the tenant’s overcharge complaint and, indeed, had accepted the tenant’s rentcontrolled rent for the preceding 16 years, DHCR did not act arbitrarily and capriciously or in violation of law when it determined that petitioner’s challenge to the tenant’s rent control status was procedurally barred *(see Roosevelt Islanders for Responsible Southtown Dev. v Roosevelt Is. Operating Corp.,*291 AD2d 40, 54 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 613 [2002]).

Even if respondent erroneously determined that the Rent Administrator’s March 22, 2002 order, issued upon reconsideration of his October 23, 2001 order, extended the tenant’s time to file a petition for administrative review from the earlier order, the expiration of the statutory time period did not preclude respondent from determining that the Rent Administrator’s orders deeming the subject apartment to be rent stabilized should be revoked by reason of an irregularity in a vital matter.

We have considered petitioner’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Sullivan and Marlow, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                     ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-61617), the
Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-
10274) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-64674) of United Water
Resources of our report dated February 20, 1997, appearing on page 27 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.



PRICE  WATERHOUSE  LLP
New York, New York
March 24, 1997
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jersey Central Power & Light Company
("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
undersigned officer of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

                                           /s/ Earl T. Carey
                                          -------------------------------
                                               Earl T. Carey
                                                President
                                           (Chief Executive Officer)
                                               August 18, 2003

                                           /s/ Richard H. Marsh
                                          ------------------------------
                                               Richard H. Marsh
                                          Senior Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                               August 18, 2003

                                      164
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT LEWIS BAILEY, SR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 141 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of December, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Understanding Adolescent Inhalant Use      

# Report: Understanding Adolescent Inhalant Use

This report uses 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data to explore inhalant use among U.S. adolescents aged 12 and older. The report highlights facts about adolescent inhalant use and types of inhalants commonly used by teens. 

http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/report_3095/ShortReport-3095.html?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Report
<PAGE>




Exhibit 99.1

              Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
                      of Title 18 of the United States Code


         I, Norman E. Johnson, the chief executive officer of CLARCOR Inc.,
certify that (i) the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of CLARCOR Inc.





                                          /s/ Norman E. Johnson
                           ----------------------------------------------------
                                            Norman E. Johnson
                                Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
                                              Executive Officer



                                  Page 22 of 23
#### 623.400 Scope of subpart.

The affirmative procurement program is applicable to all domestic acquisitions of items currently designated by an EPA guideline or by future guidelines promulgated by EPA. The requirements of this section are not applicable to acquisitions awarded outside the United States or its possessions.

[64 FR 43626, Aug. 11, 1999, as amended at 69 FR 19336, Apr. 13, 2004]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Digital Bicycle and Pedestrian Motion Graphics      

# Digital Bicycle and Pedestrian Motion Graphics

NHTSA has developed new motion graphics that rely on images and animations that can help people who speak different languages or may be hearing impared learn about bicycle and pedestrian safety concepts.
(May 20, 2004)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew Smith, Appellant.

[776 NYS2d 528]

Carpinello, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia, Jr., J.), rendered April 4, 2001 in Rensselaer County, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny.

Following a jury trial, defendant was found guilty of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny based upon evidence that *918he broke into his neighbors’ first floor apartment and stole computer disks. Sentenced to an 11-year prison term on the burglary conviction and a concurrent one-year term on the petit larceny conviction, he now appeals. We affirm.

The trial testimony established that Matthew Bennett and Peter Cooke returned to their apartment one night and discovered that their front door had been broken open. Upon searching the premises, Cooke discovered defendant “scrunched up” in his bedroom closet. Notably, when they had left one hour earlier, the front door was intact and locked and defendant was outside socializing with others on the front steps.

The police were immediately contacted and defendant arrested. At this time, computer disks were found on his person. At trial, one of these disks was identified as belonging to Cooke and the remaining disks were identified as belonging to another occupant of the apartment. Thus, we are satisfied that the burglary and petit larceny charges were established by legally sufficient evidence and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Further, since we have found the verdict to be legally sufficient, defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence before the grand jury is foreclosed (see CPL 210.30 [6]; see *also People v Huston,*88 NY2d 400, 411 [1996]; *People v Civitello,*287 AD2d 784, 786 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 703 [2002]).

Next, to the extent preserved for this Court’s review, we are unpersuaded by defendant’s claim that the petit larceny charge was not sufficiently pleaded to enable him to prepare a defense. The indictment, as amplified by the bill of particulars, adequately informed defendant that he was being charged with stealing computer disks from a specific residence and that these disks belonged to one or more of three named individuals who lived there (see *generally People v Iannone,*45 NY2d 589 [1978]). Moreover, this is exactly what was proven at trial. Thus, we are unpersuaded that the indictment suffered from any jurisdictional infirmity because it did not allege all of the elements of petit larceny *(cf. People v Wilson,*93 NY2d 222 [1999]) or that defendant was tried for a crime different than that charged in the indictment.

Defendant’s remaining contentions, including the claim that his sentencing was illegal, have been reviewed and rejected as meritless.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
#### 606.303-1 Requirements.

Justifications for contract actions prescribed in FAR 6.303-1(d) shall be forwarded by the contracting officer to A/OPE for transmittal to the Office of the United States Trade Representative.

[53 FR 26165, July 11, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 66755, Dec. 28, 1994]
May
17, 2017


 


Securities
and Exchange Commission


100
F. Street, N.E.


Washington,
DC 20549


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


We
have read item 4.01 of Form 8-K dated May 17, 2017, of Diego Pellicer Worldwide, Inc. and are in agreement with the statements
contained in the second, third and fourth paragraphs on page 2 therein as it pertains to our Firm. We have no basis to agree or
disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.


 


	/s/ Paritz & Company P.A.	 




 


Hackensack,
New Jersey
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Creek

ior

up rte

or

eon

Hazeito

exos

Te

BULLET!
IN 1024 PLATE 9

For detail of this area
see plate &

EXPLANATION

Veins

Gray copper vein
Ruby silver vein
Marsh vein
Canyon vein
Ramport vein
Cliff vein

Silver Falls vein
Slide vein

03737
Rock and vein samples

©3377
Stream samples

rammono>

Approximate p
contact between Texas
Creek granadiorite ond
Hozelton group

ion of

Map in part tram map by A.O. Moa

By Walter S. West and Paul D. Benson, 1949

MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF SURFACE SAMPLES ON THE MOUNTAIN VIEW PROPERTY, HYDER DIST! RICT, ALASKA

pt

4

2000 Feet
eet

334310 © - 55 (In pocket)
#### Kelly Krechmer, Respondent, v Mark Mintzer, D.M.D., et al., Appellants.

[776 NYS2d 788]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila Abdus-Salaam, J), entered April 24, 2003, which, after a jury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $230,450, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The jury was entitled to resolve questions of credibility and conflicting expert testimony, and concluded that the appliance fit plaintiff improperly when first made. There is no basis for *285setting aside the verdict. Furthermore, the amount of damages did not deviate materially from what is reasonable compensation under these circumstances.

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Lerner, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**285 CA 14-01485**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

SCOTT BOWMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

JEANETTE E. ZUMPANO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, KATHI WHEATLEY AND RANDY K. WHEATLEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

ATHARI & ASSOCIATES, LLC, NEW HARTFORD (MO ATHARI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, ALBANY (AUBREY A. ROMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Patrick F. MacRae, J.), entered January 2, 2014. The order, among other things, granted the cross motion of defendants Kathi Wheatley and Randy K. Wheatley to dismiss the complaint against them.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court.

Entered: May 1, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Emoji Drug Code: Decoded      

# Resource: Emoji Drug Code: Decoded

This fact sheet (PDF, 1 page) provides parents, caregivers, educators, and other influencers with a road map on how emojis are used in conjunction with illegal drug activity. It lists symbols used to communicate about specific substances often advertised and sold on social media and e-commerce platforms. **Learn more.****(PDF, 1 page)**