alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Cinergy Corp., The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company,PSI Energy, Inc. and Union Light, Heat and Power Company (the “Companies”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Rogers,Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to thebest of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Companies.

 

 
| /s/ James E.  Rogers     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| James E.  Rogers         |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| May 09, 2003             |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companiesand will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 99.1
                          Chief Consolidated Mining Co.
                             15988 Silver Pass Road
                               Post Office Box 51
                                Eureka, UT 84628



                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

    I, Richard R. Schreiber, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
   executive officer) of Chief Consolidated Mining Company (the "Registrant"),
   certifies that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the
   Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 of the
   Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


/s/ Richard R. Schreiber
___________________________

Name:     Richard R. Schreiber

Date: August 19, 2002

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2
                          Chief Consolidated Mining Co.
                             15988 Silver Pass Road
                               Post Office Box 51
                                Eureka, UT 84628



                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, John E. Henderson, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of
Chief Consolidated Mining Company (the "Registrant"), certifies that to the
BEST of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


/s/ John E. Henderson
__________________

Name:     John E. Henderson

Date:     August 19, 2002
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1027 PLATE 12
T. 48 N., R. 80 W.

BED 6
secl5 Secl6 Sec 7 Sec 8 soc 23 Sec2h_—Sec25 «See 25 «SecA See 28 Sec 29 See Sev
Fin fee) Lom eed Ft in fed FL in egghom Sgr in bagft in Fein feo Rom ped Ft ine Ft in bead Ft
8 10
p Le i", ae fee
26 24 ap 2 2 4 8
iz 10 =
= 3 5 2 fe
~ = 2 4 10
3
_ T.48 N..R. 80 W. EXPLANATION
BED 5 BED 4 BED 3
m bey in et Fin ecg Ft in eget m fea Ft in fea Ft on Read in EH in fe FE in feed in =
7 n 1 u 12 8
3
3 6A be
Legis E ‘7 Bony coal
1 3 10 =
t
T 6 6 4
2 2 gs a6 = Shale
7s 2
1
Gly
46

SECTIONS OF COAL BEDS MEASURED IN T. 48 N., R. 80 W,, CRAZY WOMAN CREEK AREA, JOHNSON COUNTY, WYOMING

339462 0 - 55 (In pocket) No.6
609.407-3 Procedures. ( a ) *Investigation and referral.* Investigation and referral shall be accomplished as provided in 609.406-3(a), except that referrals made to the suspending official shall cite causes pertinent to a suspension action (see FAR 9.407-2).
( b ) *Decisionmaking process.* ( 1 ) If the contractor does not respond to a notice of suspension within 30 calendar days after receipt of the notice, the suspending official may proceed with completion of investigation.
( 2 ) The DOS decisionmaking process for a suspension action pursuant to FAR 9.407-3(b) follow those established for a debarment action (see 609.406(b)), except that the contractor may request and shall be entitled to a hearing before the fact-finding official only if permitted under FAR 9.407-3(b)(2).
( c ) *Notice of suspension.* Notice of suspension shall be accomplished as provided in 609.406-3(a), except that the suspending official shall process the notice in accordance with FAR 9.407-3(c).
( d ) *Suspending official's decision.* In addition to complying with FAR 9.407-3(d), the suspending official shall provide single copies of the decision to each DOS organizational element affected by the decision.
[53 FR 26165, July 11, 1988, as amended at 81 FR 51128, Aug. 3, 2016]
#### 6106.613 Decision; finality [Rule 613].

The panel will advise the parties when the arbitration is closed. The panel will resolve a dispute within 60 calendar days thereafter unless the panel advises the parties that the Board Chair approves a later date. The panel's decision may be issued in writing or orally with transcription. A decision is primarily for the parties, is not precedential, and should concisely resolve the dispute. The decision of a panel majority is the final administrative action on the arbitrated dispute and is judicially reviewable only to the limited extent provided by the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. 10). Within 30 calendar days after issuing a decision, a panel may correct clerical, typographical, technical, or arithmetic errors. A panel may not reconsider the merits of its decision resolving an eligibility or repayment dispute.
836.204 Disclosure of the magnitude of construction projects. The contracting officer shall utilize the estimated price ranges defined in FAR 36.204(a) through (e) as further supplemented below when identifying the magnitude of a VA project in advance notices and solicitations: ( f ) For estimated price ranges between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000, the contracting officer shall identify the magnitude of a VA project in advance notices and solicitations in terms of the following price ranges: ( 1 ) Between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000.
( 2 ) Between $2,000,000 and $5,000,000.
( g ) Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000.
( h ) For estimated price ranges greater than $10,000,000, the contracting officer shall identify the magnitude of a VA project in advance notices and solicitations in terms of one of the following price ranges: ( 1 ) Between $10,000,000 and $20,000,000.
( 2 ) Between $20,000,000 and $50,000,000.
( 3 ) Between $50,000,000 and $100,000,000.
( 4 ) Between $100,000,000 and $150,000,000.
( 5 ) Between $150,000,000 and $200,000,000.
( 6 ) Between $200,000,000 and $250,000,000.
( 7 ) More than $250,000,000.
[84 FR 9972, Mar. 19, 2019]
Exhibit 32.10


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
                 OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CILCORP INC.
                         (required by Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended March
31,  2004 of CILCORP  Inc.  (the  "Company")  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"),  I, Warner L. Baxter,
chief financial officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Form 10-Q fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 10, 2004



                                      /s/ Warner L. Baxter
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Warner L. Baxter
                                      Executive Vice President and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      (Principal Financial Officer)
#### 922.103-5 Contract clauses.

In accordance with 48 CFR 22.101-1(e) and 48 CFR 22.103-5, the contracting officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 52.222-1, Notice to the Government of Labor Disputes, in all solicitations and contracts for protective services at DOE owned facilities requiring continuity of services for public safety and national security reasons. The contracting officer may insert this clause in other solicitations and contracts where a significant need for continuity in contract performance exists. See subpart 937.70, Protective Services Contracting, for additional policy guidance regarding protective services.

[58 FR 36151, July 6, 1993, as amended at 74 FR 36365, July 22, 2009; 75 FR 69012, Nov. 10, 2010]
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chyron Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Wellesley-Wesley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 11, 2006
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
CABG Medical, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company) We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-121621) on Form
S-8 of CABG Medical, Inc. (a developmental stage company) of our report dated February 18, 2005,
except for note 11 which is as of March 22, 2005, with respect to the balance sheets of CABG
Medical, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the related statements of operations,
stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 2004 and for the period from December 3, 1999 (date of inception) to December 31, 2004, which
appears in the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K of CABG Medical, Inc. /s/ KPMG LLP
 Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 25, 2005
#### INVISTA NORTH AMERICA S.A.R.L., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RHODIA POLYAMIDE INTERMEDIATES S.A.S., Defendant-Cross Appellant.

No. 2007-1576.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 11, 2007.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           AmeriCorps      

# AmeriCorps

AmeriCorps (formerly the Corporation for National and Community Service) brings people together to tackle the country’s most pressing challenges, through national service and volunteering. AmeriCorps is the only federal agency tasked with elevating service and volunteerism in America. AmeriCorps provides opportunities for people of all ages and backgrounds to give their time and talent to strengthen communities across the country. By bringing people together to serve communities, AmeriCorps is making service to others an indispensable part of the American experience. AmeriCorps offers individuals and organizations flexible ways to make a local impact through several key programs: State and National, VISTA, NCCC, Foster Grandparents, Senior Companions, RSVP, and Volunteer Generation Fund, along with initiatives including 9/11 and MLK Day of Service.

https://americorps.gov/
**Exhibit 32(i)****CLARCOR Inc.****Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     We hereby certify that the accompanying Quarterly Report of CLARCOR Inc. on Form 10-Q for thefiscal quarter ended March 1, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CLARCORInc.         March 25, 2008   By /s/ Norman E. Johnson           (Date)     Norman E. Johnson        Chairman of the Board, President and        Chief Executive Officer           March 25, 2008   By /s/ Bruce A. Klein           (Date)     Bruce A. Klein        Vice President — Finance and        Chief Financial Officer
bmc_ex107.htm

EXHIBIT 10.7

 

 

 

 


	 
	1

	


	 



 

 


	 
	2

	


	 



 

 


	 
	3

	


	 



 

 


	 
	4

	


	 



 

 


	 
	5

	


	 



 

 


	 
	6

	


	 



 

 


	 
	7

	


	 



 

 


	 
	8

	


	 



 

 


	
9
#### Edgar H. Buckley and Clara M. Buckley, appellants, v. Thomas M. Kilbride, Ridgely Farmers State Bank and O. E. Lemon, sheriff, appellees.

Gen. No. 7,995.

Bill to enjoin enforcement of judgment. Decree for respondents. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Sangamon county; the Hon. E. S. Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1926.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed July 1, 1926.

Rehearing denied October 28, 1926.

William *L.*Patton, for appellants.

Edward C. Knotts, for Ridgely Farmers State Bank, appellee.

Mr. Justice Shurtleff

delivered the opinion of the court.
+ ._.“-

MARK WHITE Attorney General 

# The Attorney General of Texas September 5, 1979.

Mr. AndyShwal, Executive Director OpinionNo. MW-53 Texas Prosecutors Coordinating Council Re: The length of the terms of P. 0. Box 13555 office of members of the Texas Austin, Texas 767R Prosecutors Coordinating Council. Dear Mr. Shuvah You have asked our opinion on the length of the terms of office of the members of .the Texas Prosecutors Coordinating Council. The statute provides that the members of the council are appointed to ovc&appingfouryear terms. V.T.C.S. arty332d, S 4. However, article 16, section 30 of the Texas Constitution provides:

The duration of all offices not fiied by this Constitution shsll never exceed two years .:. . See also Tex. Const. art. 16, S 30a (provides for six-year terms of offices in certain circumstances). Under the clear terms. of the constitution, the fouryear terms provided in the statute are impermissible. Kimbrough v. Rarnett, 55 S.W. 120(Tex. 1900). In similar situations the courts have concluded that persons appointed to impermissiblylong.terms serve the two-year term permitted by the constitution. Delta Electric Const. Co. v. City of San Antonio, 437 S.W.Zd 602 (Tex. Civ. App. - San Antonio 1969, writ ref ’d n.r.e.5 San Antonio IndependentSchool District v. State, 173S.W. 525 (Tex. Civ. Apy S Antonio 1915, writ ref ’d) Accordingly, members of the Texas ProsZtors Coordinating Council’serve for a term of two years or until their successors are appointedandqualified. Tex. Const. art. 16,S 17. SUMMARY Members of the Texas Prosecutors Coordinating Council serve terms of two years.

Attorney General of Texas

p. 169c,..
..

Mr. AndyShuval - Page Two (NW-53)

JOHNW. FAINTER,JR. First AssistantAttorney General TED L. HARTLEY Executive AssistantAttorney General Preparedby C. Robert Heath Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION

COMMI ’MXE C. Robert Heath, Chairman DavidB. Brooks SusanGarrison Rick Gilpin WilliamG Reid Bruce Youngblood

P. 170
#### In the Matter of James L. McEnerney, an Attorney, Respondent. Suffolk County Bar Association, Petitioner.

This is a proceeding to discipline respondent, an áttfómey, for professional misconduct. The petition charges that, incident to certain real estate transactions in which respondent had been retained: (1) he commingled his clients’ moneys, given to him to hold in escrow, with his own money; (2) he converted to his personal use $1,000 belonging to his clients; (3) he issued a check for $1,000 on a bank account which was closed or which had insufficient funds; (4) he falsely represented to petitioner’s grievance committee that he would make prompt restitution of the said $1,000; (5) he failed to make such restitution; and (6) he failed to obey the directive of the said grievance committee to produce .the documents and records pertaining to the said real estate transactions and failed otherwise to make full disclosure of the facts and circumstances surrounding his failure to repay to his clients the escrow moneys due and owing to them. Although the petition and notice of motion were duly served upon respondent, he has failed to appear in this proceeding- or to answer the petition on the return day. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is directed to be struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective December 1, 1964. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### Josef Fried, Appellant, v Marcello Valenzano et al., Respondents.

[776 NYS2d 481]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Kapnick, J), entered July 31, 2003, which, in an action for specific performance, dismissed the complaint after a nonjury trial, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The writing on which plaintiff relies, liberally construed in his favor, purports to form a joint venture between the parties for the purpose of selling any of defendants’ properties in Harlem as might be selected by plaintiff. There is not the slightest indication in the writing of any agreement by defendants to convey any lands to plaintiff. No such intent can be discerned in the clauses of the writing under which plaintiff was to pay defendants $1,000 per frontal foot on any property selected for the joint venture, and, along with defendants, have a right of first refusal on the sale of any such property. These clauses, like the others in the writing, merely set forth the parties’ rights and obligations to each other as venturers. Nor can plaintiff resort to parol evidence to show that conveyances to him were intended (General Obligations Law § 5-703 [2]; *see O’Brien v West,*199 AD2d 369). Accordingly, plaintiff has no cause of action for specific performance of a contract to convey lands. Nor should there be a remand to adjust any outstanding equities *(cf Mattikow v Sudarsky,*248 NY 404 [1928]). Elaintiff never asked for an accounting, and, while his complaint alleges that he spent $4,500 for title searches and attorney due diligence fees, no evidence concerning such expenses was adduced at trial. We note that the writing bears the notation “Rough draft” *(cf. LaRuffa v Fleet Bank,*260 AD2d 299 [1999]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Lerner and Gonzalez, JJ.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Youth Tobacco Prevention      

# Youth Tobacco Prevention

This resource from the Centers on Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) offers educational resources and materials, such as videos, tip sheets, and posters related to youth tobacco prevention.

http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/youth/index.htm
#### 52.227-5 Waiver of Indemnity.

As prescribed in 27.201-2(e), insert the following clause:

# Waiver of Indemnity (APR 1984)

Any provision or clause of this contract to the contrary notwithstanding, the Government hereby authorizes and consents to the use and manufacture, solely in performing this contract, of any invention covered by the United States patents identified below and waives indemnification by the Contractor with respect to such patents:

*Contracting Officer identify the patents by number or by other means if more appropriate*

(End of clause)

[49 FR 12987, Mar. 30, 1984, as amended at 72 FR 63066, Nov. 7, 2007]