alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ditmars Real Estate Consultants, Inc., Appellant, v Michael J. Ferlisi, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[775 NYS2d 879]

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated July 1, 2003, as granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied its cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and substituting therefor a provision denying that motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
#### Peter R. Sturner et al., Appellants, v. Louis Cook et al., Respondents.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
# C_2021002EN.01000101.xml

| 5.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 2/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

0,00 % on 1 January 2021

Euro exchange rates (2)

4 January 2021

(2021/C 2/01)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2296 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4379 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90160 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0895 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0811 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 156,10 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 10,4440 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,141 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 361,32 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5475 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,8713 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 9,0579 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5928 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5621 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5330 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7065 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6198 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 332,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9214 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9484 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5565 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 17 062,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9264 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,058 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 90,3420 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,728 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 6,3241 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 24,3031 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 89,7890 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2296

JPY

Japanese yen

126,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4379

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90160

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0895

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0811

ISK

Iceland króna

156,10

NOK

Norwegian krone

10,4440

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,141

HUF

Hungarian forint

361,32

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5475

RON

Romanian leu

4,8713

TRY

Turkish lira

9,0579

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5928

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5621

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5330

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7065

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6198

KRW

South Korean won

1 332,03

ZAR

South African rand

17,9214

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9484

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5565

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

17 062,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9264

PHP

Philippine peso

59,058

RUB

Russian rouble

90,3420

THB

Thai baht

36,728

BRL

Brazilian real

6,3241

MXN

Mexican peso

24,3031

INR

Indian rupee

89,7890

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

---
(March 6, 1967)

#### James Black, Respondent, v. Fisher Bros. et al., Appellants.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 29,1966, reversed, without costs, and defendants’ motion to vacate plaintiff’s notice for pretrial examination of defendants granted. In our opinion, plaintiff must be deemed to have waived his right to an examination before trial of defendants in view of his failure to serve a notice for such examination prior to the sixtieth day after he served a note of issue (Rules of this court, part 7, rule IX). Nor does the proffered excuse of “ oversight ” in failing to timely mail his examination notice constitute an “unusual and unanticipated” condition within the meaning of rule VII of part 7 of said rules *(Byrnes*v. *Dan’s Taxi,*18 A D 2d 807; *Jacobs*v. *Peress,*23 A D 2d 483). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.2

     


 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 







 We have issued our report dated May 23, 2017, with respect to the financial statement of Alaia Market Linked Trust Series 4-2, comprising the Strategas Repatriation Portfolio, contained in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-217286) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”. 

















 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

















 Chicago, Illinois 


 May 23, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-03-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-01-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                          12,992
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,048
<INVENTORY>                                     59,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,010
<PP&E>                                         164,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,879
<BONDS>                                         46,516
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,939
<OTHER-SE>                                     127,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,494
<SALES>                                        172,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               172,554
<CGS>                                          122,066
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   289
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,869
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,029
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,029
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
#### 725.401 Exceptions.

FAR subpart 25.4 establishes procedures for purchases of supplies under the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (including the World Trade Organization's Government Procurement Agreement) and the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, as approved by Congress in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act (Government Procurement Agreement applicable only to United States and Mexico) (Pub. L. 116-113) (19 U.S.C. chapter 29 (sections 4501-4732)). Consistent with these agreements, USAID operating expense-funded administrative procurements for supplies for use in the United States are subject to the procedures in FAR part 25, unless otherwise excepted in FAR subpart 25.4. USAID program-funded contracts for the purpose of providing foreign assistance are not subject to the procedures set forth in FAR subpart 25.4

[89 FR 4206, Jan. 23, 2024]
#### 46.312 Construction contracts.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 52.246-12, Inspection of Construction, in solicitations and contracts for construction when a fixed-price contract is contemplated and the contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold. The contracting officer may insert the clause in such solicitations and contracts when the contract amount is expected to be at or below the simplified acquisition threshold, and its use is in the Government's interest.

[48 FR 42415, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34760, July 3, 1995]
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION BY
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Wellesley-Wesley, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chyron Corporation (the "registrant") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the "report");



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.









Date: August 11, 2004







|/s/ Michael Wellesley-Wesley
|----------------------------
|Michael Wellesley-Wesley    
|President and               
|Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chicago Rivet & Machine
Co. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael J. Bourg, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Michael J. Bourg
-------------------------------------
Name: Michael J. Bourg
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 4, 2007
608.7003 Acquisitions on behalf of other Federal agencies. ( a ) *Acquisition of U.S. manufactured vehicles.* ( 1 ) GSA is the mandatory source for official vehicles purchased in the United States for all Federal agencies. Non-DOS agencies must have a waiver from GSA that allows them to acquire official vehicles from sources in the United States other than GSA, in accordance with the Federal Property Management Regulation, 41 CFR 101-38.104.
( 2 ) DOS overseas contracting activities shall not obtain GSA waivers or acquire vehicles through GSA or directly from sources in the United States on behalf of other agencies. Requests to acquire vehicles in this manner shall be returned to the requesting agency without action, and the agency instructed to use its own contracting personnel or GSA for this purpose.
( b ) *Acquisition from non-U.S. sources.* No GSA waiver is required for official vehicles purchased outside the United States from non-U.S. sources. Normal acquisition procedures shall be followed. However, contracting officers should be aware that statutory ceilings apply to the acquisition of passenger vehicles (*i.e.,* sedans and station wagons) (see P.L. 103-329), so other agencies shall not request that posts acquire vehicles without providing an analysis of how the price compares with this ceiling.
#### 945.602-70 Local screening.

Local screening shall be done using EADS.
#### 552.238-99 Delivery Prices Overseas.

As prescribed in 538.273(d)(23), insert the following clause:

# Delivery Prices Overseas (MAY 2019)

(a) Prices offered must cover delivery to destinations as provided as follows:

(1) Direct delivery to consignee. F.O.B. Inland Point, Country of Importation (FAR 52.247-39). (Offeror should indicate countries where direct delivery will be provided.)

(2) Delivery to overseas assembly point for transshipment when specified by the ordering activity, if delivery is not covered under paragraph (1), above.

(3) Delivery to the overseas port of entry when delivery is not covered under paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section.

(b) Geographic area(s)/countries/zones which are intended to be covered must be identified in the offer.

(End of clause)

[84 FR 17046, Apr. 23, 2019]
#### 852.212-71 Gray Market and Counterfeit Items.

As prescribed in 812.301(f), insert the following clause:

# Gray Market and Counterfeit Items (FEB 2023)

(a) No used, refurbished, or remanufactured supplies or equipment/parts shall be provided. This procurement is for new Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) items only. No gray market items shall be provided. Gray market items are OEM goods intentionally or unintentionally sold outside an authorized sales territory or sold by non-authorized dealers in an authorized sales territory.

(b) No counterfeit supplies or equipment/parts shall be provided. Counterfeit items include unlawful or unauthorized reproductions, substitutions, or alterations that have been mismarked, misidentified, or otherwise misrepresented to be an authentic, unmodified item from the original manufacturer, or a source with the express written authority of the original manufacturer or current design activity, including an authorized aftermarket manufacturer. Unlawful or unauthorized substitutions include used items represented as new, or the false identification of grade, serial number, lot number, date code, or performance characteristics.

(c) Vendor shall be an OEM, authorized dealer, authorized distributor, or authorized reseller for the proposed equipment/system, verified by an authorization letter or other documents from the OEM. All software licensing, warranty and service associated with the equipment/system shall be in accordance with the OEM terms and conditions.

(End of clause)

[88 FR 4752, Jan. 25, 2023]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7303
ELIZABETH KNEWASSER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. HAROLD EADS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-531-R) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 7, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Elizabeth Knewasser, Appellant Pro Se. James Harold Eads, Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Elizabeth Knewasser seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Knewasser v. Eads , No. CA-98- 531-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 21, l998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CEO)
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)I, Kelly Archer, President and Chief Executive Officer of Church Loans & Investments Trust, certify that:1.I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Church Loans & Investments Trust;2.Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;4.The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants Board of Trust Managers:(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.Dated: August 14, 2007/s/ Kelly Archer                         .Kelly Archer, President & CEO
#### In the Matter of Andrew J. Eld, Respondent, v Thomas J. Wohlrab, as Police Commissioner of the City of Newburgh Police Department, et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, *inter alia,*to review so much of the determination of the Police Commissioner of the City of Newburgh as, upon finding petitioner guilty of certain charges, demoted him from the position of sergeant to patrolman, respondents appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated May 9, 1978, which (1) granted the petition, (2) restored petitioner to his former position of sergeant, and (3) confirmed the recommendation of the hearing officer as to disciplinary punishment, i.e., one week’s suspension without pay on each of two charges. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We agree with Special Term that the penalty of demotion was, in the circumstances of this case, so disproportionate to the offense as to shock one’s sense of fairness (see *Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). Titone, J. P., Suozzi, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Bellows Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2004 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  March 25, 2005