STILLMEADOW 

I NCO R P 0 RAT E D 

VOLUME OF OF SUBMISSION 

Alcohols, C18-22, distn. residues (CAS No: 1160164-88-4) 

FINAL REPORT 

ACUTE EYE IRRITATION STUDY IN RABBITS 

OECDNO.405 

AUTIIOR: 

Janice O. Kuhn, PhD, DABT 

STUDY INITIATION DATE: 11 September 2009 

STUDY COMPLETION DATE: 06 October 2009 

CONDUCTED BY: 

STll.,LMEADOW, Inc. 

12852 Park One Drive 

Sugar Land, TX 77478 

LABORATORY STUDY NUMBER: 

13294-09 

VOLUME.l OF .l OF STUDY 

PAGE.l OF --.l2. 

SUBMITTED TO: 

Sasol Germany GmbH 

Anckelmannsplatz 1 

Hamburg, Germany 20537 

12852 Park One Drive. Sugar Land, Texas 77498 • 281 240-8828 • Fax 281 240-8448 

www.stillmeadow.com 
13294-09 

Page 2 of 15 

GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT 

This study was designed and performed at STILLMEADOW, Inc. and was conducted in compliance with 

United States Environmental Protection Agency TSCA 40 CFR 792 with exception of: 

Section 792.31 (d) and 792.105 (a )(b )( e) The provided Certificate of Analysis was not accompanied by a 

GLP compliance statement. . 

This study was designed and performed at STILLMEADOW, Inc. and was conducted in compliance with 

Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development Principles of GLP, Annex 2, C(98)17 with 

exception of: 

Section IT, 1.1 (2)(p), 6.1 (1) and 6.2 (2)(4) The provided Certificate of Analysis was not accompanied 

by a GLP compliance statement. 

This study was designed and performed at STILLMEADO W, Inc. and was conducted in compliance with 

Japan Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries, Notification No. 11 Nousan 6283, Director-General 

of Agricultural Production Bureau with exception of: 

11 Nousan 6283 Article 3.1 (18), ·12.5 and 12.7 The provided Certificate of Analysis was not 

accompanied by a GLP compliance statement. 

uhn, PhD, DABT 

ector, STILLMEADOW, Inc. 

Signature of Agent of Sponsor 

Agent Name 

Sponsor: Sasol Germany GmbH 

Signature of Agent of Submitter 

Agent Name 

Submitter: Sasol NA 

Date 

Date 

Date 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT 

Test Substance: Alcohols, C18-22, distn. residues (CAS No: 1160164-88-4) 

Study Title: Acute Eye Irritation Study in Rabbits 

13294-09 

Page 3 of15 

The study report and data have been audited in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice Standards and 

STILLMEADOW, mc. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). The fmal report accurately reflects the 

study data. The Quality Assurance Unit has not been involved in the actual conduct of this study. 

The Quality Assurance Unit performed a recent facility inspection on 10 Jul 09. All fmdings were 

reported to Management, and the report and responses are kept in the Quality Assurance files. 

The fmdings from any study inspections and audits were reported to the Study Director and Management 

as follows: 

Critical Phase Inspected Date Inspected Reported to Reported to 

Study Director Management 

Protocol Review 8 Sep 09 8 Sep 09 8 Sep 09 

Dosing 21 Sep 09 21 Sep 09 21 Sep 09 

Report/Data Audit 01 Gct 09 01 Gct 09 01 Gct 09 

Richard r:.Martin, MS, CPhT 

Quality Assurance, STILLMEADO! ,mc. 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

13294-09 

Page 4 of15 

Page 

GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT. ............................................. 2 

QUALITY ASSURANCE STATEMENT .......................................................................................... 3 

SUMMARy ........................................................................................................................................ 5 

INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 5 

TEST SUBSTANCE ........................................................................................................................... 5 

, TEST SySTEM ................................................................................................................................... 6 

PROCEDURES ................................................................................................................................... 6 

Test Substance Administration ...................... '" ............................................................................... 6 

Observations .................................................................................................................................... 7 

Irritation Scoring Method ................................................................................................................ 7 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................... 7 

Evaluation ........................................................................................................................................ 7 

CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................... 7 

SIGNATURE ...................................................................................................................................... 7 

STUDY PERSONNEL ........................................................................................................................ 8 

LEGEND TO TABLE 1 ...................................................................................................................... 9 

LEGEND TO TABLE 2 .................................................................................................................... 11 

TABLE 1 - Ocular Reactions ............................................................................................................. 12 

TABLE 2 - Scores and Score Summary ............................................................................................. 1 4 

APPENDIX A - Certificate of Analysis ................................................................ : ............................ 15 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
SUMMARY 

13294-09 

Page 5 of15 

An acute eye irritation study was conducted on three albino rabbits using test substance Alcohols, C 18-22, 

distn. residues (CAS No: 1160164-88-4). The test substance, 0.1 mL by volume (33.1 mg), was placed 

into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of each animal selected for testing. All treated eyes were washed 

with room temperature deionized water for one minute immediately after recording the 24-hour 

observation. 

The number of animals testing "positive" for each parameter (according to the Legend to Table 1) over the 

number of animals tested is presented below. 

Time After Treatment 

Hours 

_1 24 48 72 

Cornea 

Opacity 0/3 0/3 0/3 0/3 

Iritis 0/3 0/3 0/3 0/3 

Conjunctivae 

Redness 0/3 0/3 0/3 0/3 

Chemosis 0/3 0/3 0/3 0/3 

There were no positive effects exhibited in any eyes at any time after treatment. Non-positive irritation 

was clear by 72 hours, and the test substance is rated minimally irritating. 

INTRODUCTION 

The objective of this study was to assess the relative level of eye irritation following a single exposure of 

the test substance to rabbits in accordance with OECD 405; OPPTS 870.2400; and Canadian notification. 

This study was conducted for Sasol Germany GmbH, according to the approved protocol and 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. SOPs. There were no deviations from the protocol that affected the quality or 

outcome of the study. All procedures in this study are in compliance with Animal Welfare Act 

Regulations. The protocol, raw data, this report and a sample of test substance are archived at 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. The study was initiated on 11 Sep 09, the pre-dose experimental portion began on 

20 Sep 09, and the animals were treated with the test substance between 1125 and 1126 on 21 Sep 09. 

The in-life portion of the study was terminated on 24 Sep 09. 

Label Identification: 

Date & Quantity Received: 

Physical Description: 

Storage: 

Purity: 

Stability: 

TEST SUBSTANCE 

Alcohols, CI8-22, distn. residues (CAS No: 1160164-88-4) 

Lot: 03585iMA Spec: 59BIRN2 

11 Sep 09; 246.3 g (GW) 

Tan solid 

Room temperature 

Refer to Certificate of Analysis 

Exp: Aug 2013 per provided information 

Data generated for characterization and stability is the responsibility of the sponsor. Records pertaining to 

identity, synthesis methods and location of documentation are the responsibility of the sponsor. A copy of 

the Certificate of Analysis. is included as report Appendi-x A. 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
Experimental Animals 

Species & Strain: 

Justification of Species: 

Source: 

Date BornlDate Received: 

Quarantine Period: 

Quantity & Sex: 

Animal/Group Identification: 

Initial Body Weights: 

Final Body Weights: 

Animal Husbandry 

Cage Type: 

Housing: 

TEST SYSTEM 

Albino rabbit; New Zealand White 

13294-09 

Page 6 of15 

The rabbit is preferred by the various regulatory agencies for use in eye 

irritation testing. 

Nichols Rabbitry Inc., Lumberton, TX 

31 May & 21 Jun 09 / 19 Aug & 9 Sep 09 

5 days 

3 female (nulliparous and non-pregnant) 

Ear tag / Cage cards 

2.700-3.150 kg 

2.750-3.300 kg 

Suspended, wire bottom, stainless steel 

1 per cage 

Environmental Controls 

Set to Maintain: . Temperature 200± 3 ° C 

. 12-hour light/dark cycle 

Actual TemplRel. Humidity: 17-22° C / 59-97% 

. Relative Humidity 30-70% 

. 10-12 air changes/hour 

Food: 

Water: 

Protocol deviation: humidity outside protocol range but did not affect 

study outcome. 

PM! Feeds, InC.TM Lab Rabbit Diet #5321, ~8 oz. daily 

Municipal water supply analyzed by TCEQ Water Utilities Division; 

available ad libitum from automatic water system 

Animal husbandry and housing at STILLMEADOW, Inc. comply with standards outlined in the "Guide 

for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" (NRC Publ.). No contaminants were expected to have been 

present in the feed or water that would have interfered with or affected the results of the study. 

PROCEDURES 

Test Substance Administration 

Healthy albino rabbits were released from quarantine. Both eyes of each animal were carefully examined 

within 24 hours prior to treatment with a fluorescein sodium ophthalmic solution and cobalt-filtered light. 

Both eyes of each animal were again carefully examined just prior to treatment, but without the 

fluorescein sodium ophthalmic solution. Only those animals without eye defects or irritation were selected 

for testing. 

On Day 0, a dose of 0.1 mL by volume (33.1 mg) of the undiluted test substance was placed into the 

conjunctival sac of the right eye of each aniinal by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball to 

form a cup into which the test substance was dropped. The lids were gently held together for one second 

to prevent loss of material. The untreated left eyes served as comparative controls. 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
Observations 

13294-09 

Page 7 of 15 

The treated eyes of all animals were examined without magnification under white room lighting provided 

by daylight-type fluorescent ceiling fixtures, and (if needed) an additional source of white light affixed to 

the examination table or using a handheld flashlight. The grades of ocular reaction were recorded at 1, 24, 

48 and 72 hours after treatment. The corneas of all treated eyes were examined immediately after the 

24-hour observation with a fluorescein sodium ophthalmic solution. A Finoff ocular transilluminator with 

cobalt blue filter (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY) was utilized to enhance visualization of 

fluorescein staining. Any of the corneas which exhibited fluorescein staining at the 24-hour observation 

were re-examined with the fluorescein sodium ophthalmic solution at each consecutive observation until 

fluorescein staining of the cornea no longer occurred. All treated eyes were washed with room 

temperature deionized water for one minute immediately after recording the 24-hour observation. 

Irritation Scoring Method 

mdividual irritation scores for each animal at each scheduled observation were determined using the 

grading scale given in the Legend to Table 1. An average irritation score for each scheduled observation 

was then determined, based on the number of animals tested. A maximum average irritation score was 

derived from the observation yielding the highest average irritation score. The maximum average irritation 

score was used to rate the test substance according to the ratings presented in the Legend to Table 2. Any 

corneal involvement or iridic irritation with a score of 1 or more is considered positive. Any conjunctival 

irritation (redness or chemosis) with a score of2 or more is considered positive. 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 

Evaluation 

The number of animals with "positive" findings, if any, at each observation period is presented in the 

summary section of this report. Ocular reactions are presented in Table 1. A summary of irritation scores 

is presented in Table 2. 

The maximum average irritation score of2.0, obtained 1 hour after treatment, "'[as used to rate A1cohols, 

C 18-22, distn. residues (CAS No: 1160164-88-4) minimally irritating. Fluorescein staining did not occur 

in any of the eyes. 

CONCLUSION 

Based on the maximum average irritation score of2.0, the test substance Alcohols, CI8-22, distn. residues 

(CAS No: 1160164-88-4) is rated minimally irritating. There were no positive effects during the study, and 

non-positive irritation was clear in all.eyes at 72 hours. 

Study Director: 

J nice . Kuhn, PhD, DABT 

Toxicologist, STILLMEADOW, mc. 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
Technical Staff: Carol Morris, BA 

Paul Siemens, BA 

Robert Preston 

STUDY PERSONNEL 

Nancy Casajuana, LAT 

Data Services: Connie Pavatte, Report Preparation 

13294-09 

Page 80f15 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
13294-09 

Page 9 of15 

LEGEND TO TABLE 1 

ACUTE EYE IRRITATION STUDY IN RABBITS 

Grading Scale 

1. Cornea 

A. Opacity - degree (area most dense taken for reading) 

No opacity....... .................................. .................................................................. ....... 0 

Slight dulling of normalluster ........... .......... ...... ....... ............... ........................... ..... ... + 

Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal 

luster), details of iris clearly visible..................... ....................... ..... ......................... 1 * 

Easily discernible translucent area, details of iris slightly obscured ......... .................. 2* 

Nacreous area, no details of iris visible, size of pupil barely discernible.................... 3* 

Opaque cornea, iris not discernible through the opacity ................................ ............. 4 * 

B. Area of cornea involved 

One quarter ( or less), but not zero. .................................. .......... ................................. 1 

Greater than one quarter, but less than halL.............................................................. 2 

Greater than half, but less than three quarters...................... ....................................... 3 

Greater than three quarters, up to whole area........................... .................................. 4 

C. Fluorescein staining - appearance of yellow-green staining of cornea 

Cornea not examined with fluorescein ............................ ......................... .................. -

No fluorescein staining............................................................................................... 0 

Positive fluorescein staining....................................................................................... . P 

Area of cornea involved 

One quarter (or less), but not zero.......................................................................... A 

Greater than one quarter, but less than halL......... .............. .................. .............. ... B 

Greater than half, but less than three quarters................................ ............ ............. C 

Greater than three quarters, up to whole area ......................................................... D 

D. Stippling - appearance of pinpoint roughening 

No stippling ................................................................................................................ 0 

Presence of stippling................................................................................................... S 

Area of cornea involved 

One quarter (or less), but not zero .......................................................................... A 

Greater than one quarter, but less than halL .................. :....................................... B 

Greater than half, but less than thre€ quarters......................................................... C 

Greater than three quarters, up to whole area ............................ .................. ........... D 

AXBX5 Total Maximum = 80 

* -Reaction indicates a positive effect. 

Reference: Draize, John H., Woodard, Geoffrey, and Calvery, Herbert 0., Journal ofPharmacol. Exp. 

Ther., 82,377-390 (1944). 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
13294-09 

Page 10 of15 

LEGEND TO TABLE 1 (cont.) 

ACUTE EYE IRRITATION STUDY IN RABBITS 

Grading Scale 

n. Iris 

A. Grades 

Normal. ................................... .'.................................................................................... 0 

Markedly deepened rugae, congestion, swelling, moderate circumcorneal 

hyperemia or injection (any of these or combination thereof), iris still 

reacting to light (sluggish reaction is positive) ......................................................... 1 * 

No reaction to light, hemorrhage, gross destruction (any or all of these).................... 2* 

AX5 Total Maximum = 10 

m. Conjunctivae 

A. Redness (refers to palpebral and bulbar conjunctivae excluding cornea 

and iris) 

Blood vessels normal.................................................................................................. 0 

Some blood vessels defmitely hyperemic (injected) ................................................... 1 

Diffuse, crimson color, individual vessels not easily discernible................................ 2* 

Diffuse beefy red........................................................ ........ ........................................ 3 * 

B. Chemosis: lids andlor nictitating membrane 

No swelling .................... :........................................................................................... 0 

Any swelling above normal (includes nictitating membrane) ............................ :........ 1 

Obvious swelling with partial eversion oflids............................................................ 2* 

Swelling with lids about half closed........................................................................... 3 * 

Swelling with lids more than h~lf closed.................................................................... 4 * 

C. Discharge 

No discharge.......................... ............................................................. ........... ...... ........ 0 

Any amount different from normal (does not include small amounts . 

observed in inner canthus of normal animals) .......................................................... 1 

Discharge with moistening ofthe lids and hairs just adjacent to lids ........ ................. 2 

Discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs, and considerable area 

. around the eye.......................................................................................................... 3 

D. Necrosis or Ulceration of the palpebral and bulbar conjunctivae or nictitating 

membrane 

No necrosis or ulceration............................................................................................ 0 

Presence of necrosis or ulceration .................................. :.... ....................................... N 

(A+B+C)X2 Total Maximum = 20 

The total score for the eye is the sum of all scores obtained for the cornea, iris, and conjunctivae with the 

possible maximum total score for the eye being equal to 110. 

* -Reaction indicates a positive effect. 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
LEGEND TO TABLE 2 

13294-09 

Page 11 of 15 

ACUTE EYE IRRITATION STUDY IN RABBITS 

Rating of Test Substance Based on Eye Irritationl 

Rating 

Non-irritating 

Practically 

non-irritating 

Minimally 

irritating 

Mildly 

irritating 

Moderately 

irritating 

Severely 

irritating 

Extremely 

irritating 

Maximum 

Average Score 

0.0-0.5 

>0.5-2.5 

>2.5-15.0 

>15.0-25.0 

>25.0-50.0 

>50.0-80.0 

>80.0-110.0 

Defmition 

To maintain this rating, all scores at the 24-hour reading must 

be zero; otherwise, increase rating one level. 

To maintain this rating, all scores at the 24-hour reading must 

be zero; otherwise, increase rating one level. 

To maintain this rating, all scores at the 72-hour reading must 

be zero; otherwise, increase rating one level. 

To maintain this rating, scores at the 7 day reading must be 

zero; otherwise, increase rating one level. 

To maintain this rating, scores at the 7 day reading must be 

less than or equal to 10 for 60% or more of the animals; also, 

the 7 day mean score must be less than or equal to 20. lfthe 7 

day mean score is less than or equal to 20, but less than 60% of 

the animals show scores less than or equal to 10, then no 

animal with a score greater than 10 can exceed a score of 30 if 

rating is to be maintained; otherwise, increase rating one level. 

To maintain this rating, scores at the 7 day reading must be 

less than or equal to 30 for 60% or more of the animals; also, 

the 7 day mean score must be less than or equal to 40. If the 7 

day mean ~core is less than or equal to 40, but less than 60% of 

the animals show scores less than or equal to 30, then no 

animal with a score greater than 30 can exceed a score of 60 if 

rating is to be maintained; otherwise, increase rating one level. 

NOTE: The rating of the test substance is not to be increased more than one level above its 

maximum average score. 

ISlightly modified from Kay, J.H. and Calandra, J.C. (1962) Interpretation of Eye Irritation Tests. J. Soc. 

Cosmetic Chemists 13 :281-289 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
TABLE 1 - Ocular Reactions 

ACUTE EYE IRRITATION STUDY IN RABBITS 

Test Substance: Alcohols, CI8-22, distn. residues (CAS No: 1160164-88-4) 

I. Cornea 

A. Opacity 

B. Area 

C. Fluorescein Staining 

D. Stippling 

SCORE 

n. Iris 

A. Grade 

SCORE 

Ill. Conjunctivae 

A. Redness 

B. Chemosis 

C. Discharge 

D. Necrosis or Ulceration 

SCORE 

TOTAL SCORE 

1. Cornea 

A. Opacity 

B. Area 

C. Fluorescein Staining 

D. Stippling 

SCORE 

n. Iris 

A. Grade 

SCORE 

Ill. Conjunctivae 

A. Redness 

B. Chemosis 

C. Discharge 

D. Necrosis or Ulceration 

SCORE 

TOTAL SCORE 

M - Male; F - Female 

Duration of Study: n Hours 

1 

0 

0 

-

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

2 

2 

1 

0 

0 

-

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

2 

2 

Rabbit No. 4217-F 

Hrs. After Treatment 1 Days After Treatment 

I 24 I 48 In 14 17 I .10 I 14 I 17 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 - - 0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

1 1 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

2 2 0 

2 2 0 \ \ 

Rabbit No. 4219-F 

Hrs. After Treatment I Days After Treatment 

124 1 48 In 14 17 -' 10 I 14 I 17 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 - - 0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

I 21 

I 21 

13294-09 

Page 12 of 15 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
TABLE 1 - Ocular Reactions (cant.) 

ACUTE EYE IRRlTATION STUDY IN RABBITS 

Test Substance: Alcohols, C18-22, distrl. residues (CAS No: 1160164-88-4) 

I. Cornea 

A. Opacity 

B. Area 

C. Fluorescein Staining 

D. Stippling 

SCORE 

IT. Iris 

A. Grade 

SCORE 

m. Conjunctivae 

A. Redness 

B. Chemosis 

C. Discharge 

D. Necrosis or Ulceration 

SCORE 

TOTAL SCORE 

M - Male; F - Female 

Duration of Study: 72 Hours 

1 

0 

0 

-

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

2 

2 

Rabbit No. 4249-F 

Hrs. After Treatment / Days After Treatment 

/ 24 / 48 /72 14 17 1 10 / 14 1 17 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 - - 0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 ( 

1 1 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

0 0 0 

2 2 0 

2 2 0 

/ 21 

13294-09 

Page 13 of15 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
TABLE 2 - Scores and Score Summary 

ACUTE EYE IRRITATION STUDY IN RABBITS 

Test Substance: Alcohols, CI8-22, distn. residues (CAS No: 1160164-88-4) 

Time After Rabbit Number 

Treatment 4217-F 4219-F 4249-F Average Score 

i , 

Hour 1 2 2 2 2.0 

Hour 24 2 0 2 1.3 

Hour 48 2 0 2 1.3 

Hour 72 0 0 0 0.0 

Day 4 

Day 7 

Day 10 

Day 14 I 

Day 17 

Day 21 I 

Maximum Average Irritation Score: I 2.0 IMinimally irritating 

M - Male; F - Female Duration of Study: 72 Hrs 

13294-09 

Page 14 of 15 

STILLMEADOW, Inc. 
APPENDIX A - Certificate of Analysis 

C E R TIP I CAT E o F 

13294-09 

Page 15 of 15 

saSDL 

9/09/2008 

ANALYSIS 

Product: 

Lot No. t 

'ManU£acturing date: 

Alcoholsl' C1.8-22 t diatn. Residuea 

0.3S8S/MA 

(S9B1RN2) 

25/08/2009 

Exp:lry date: oa/2\ll.3 

Unit Result Teata: 

_~=:_. __ ~~= •• ~~=~~~~~~;~~~~.g==~~=:~~~~w--~~~~~~==.a_-~~~~~~~~=~~~=~;=;~~~BDk~~.~.=~:=; 

H~Ox.yl - Nwribex: [mg KCH/g] SO, 

I!:st~ No. Img XOH!g] 41,1'1 

Aci." No. [mg KOR/gl ()~O-9 

water rwt.. \] 0,02 

Iodl,ne No. [mg l/100mq] 5,34 

Sasol Germany GmbH 

F.O. Box l16{) 

D-25534 :exunsbuettel 

Phone: 049 (0) 4852/392 -0 Fax: 049 (0)4852/3.285 

Best regards works inspector 

M. Sprung 

Die Dbr,1,;c;fl\1ung die~9'S A].fl/ylmnZBliifU<aJ>; "rf"IgI ledlgllGh 4!.lf 

Iniommthllll.ll1d ~Iijllll'.j)il~e 6e~cl1:;ffenboll!;- Ill1d Haitbilfl<llll;;, 

S.;'l'1l!niE .elm .. Die 1Jts~,,~ entbh,dru oor1 Empilir'gernitht V~;1ll 

c .... r DurctllOlln.ing 'liner ordntJr.iJ*mfu)'l~ Wllfere;ogar..gspr[lful\i 

[!ie!o"'~ !Vl"I)'s~m:er\irll~ j)';Q(\)l'1oc[ ltelne Al'ls{liOcha Dritis!. ,,"' 

di~ ~t w~j1'i'!V~f'9!:cpt wjl'Q, ~n', \)f)rt'~~1 ~'tI?!11ot.lq~~r~ -flJ~9m9ii":l~!' 

This cl'J1Jjieate 01 ;;"a~'~l$;is ftlr jniorm13iion Ol'l~ and doe~ nQi !J(li!-

1'l;;nlce <lny p3r\iGlll1lr pmdlJCi pl"Op&lI .. ",_ il OIl~5 not iree the ,;,;dpien! ~ tt'>G obligmien to calty 001 !l. flmdllOl r;;cmo.1ng impQC\lo.t. This 

~rliiiC;;.te ,:)j atlSlty1lis <iQaF. "'-"i[ Cf<l2t;a clalnl~ of tllhtl ~es to IIDi:;)' 

Ii Is p!l6!lcci 0:1. /)S tror~;;tiol!E arit- $!,Joje;t "l-:J<i;\1l' G".entral Buglp,p~s 

C-=;ndi~"'f-11i ~. m"'im~"~ HPi-r.t ih-f) ~fmo o{]onocrnt;.'ci. 

STILLMEADOW, Inc.